Sign In  |  Register  |  About Livermore  |  Contact Us

Livermore, CA
September 01, 2020 1:25pm
7-Day Forecast | Traffic
  • Search Hotels in Livermore

  • CHECK-IN:
  • CHECK-OUT:
  • ROOMS:

Starbucks catches break as judge vacates nationwide ban on firing union workers

A federal judge in Michigan has vacated his order blocking Starbucks from firing employees who attempt to unionize, citing "certain errors" in his opinion.

In a lucky break for Starbucks, the federal judge who issued a nationwide injunction prohibiting the coffee chain from firing union-friendly workers has vacated his decision, citing "certain errors" in his previous ruling.

On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith rejected the National Labor Relations Boards' (NLRB) request for a nationwide cease-and-desist order prohibiting Starbucks from discharging employees that participate in protected union activities. The judge found that NLRB failed to show "that Starbucks has implemented a corporate-wide anti-union policy such that a cease-and-desist order should apply to every Starbucks location in the country." 

Goldsmith issued a new injunction that specifically prohibits the Starbucks store in Ann Arbor, Mich., from firing employees who attempt to unionize. It was an abrupt reversal from the judge's Feb. 17 order, which implemented a nationwide injunction against Starbucks.

JUDGE BLOCKS STARBUCKS FROM FIRING WORKERS ATTEMPTING TO UNIONIZE

STARBUCKS PUTTING OUT OLIVE OIL-INFUSED COFFEE DRINKS

That order contained "certain errors" which Goldsmith addressed in an opinion accompanying his new, more limited injunction. 

"The record supports a finding of reasonable cause as to a violation of the [National Labor Relations Act] at the Starbucks location on Main Street in Ann Arbor, and just and proper injunctive relief is limited to that location," Goldsmith wrote. 

STARBUCKS FRAPPUCCINO BOTTLES RECALLED OVER FOREIGN OBJECT

The new order retained Goldsmith's earlier requirement that Starbucks reinstate Hannah Whitbeck, a shift supervisor who alleges she was fired by the Ann Arbor store for engaging in protected unionizing activities. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX BUSINESS APP

Starbucks maintains that Whitbeck was fired for violating the company's partner safety policies and denies she was persecuted for union organizing. The company also argues the NLRB is overreaching in this case, noting that Whitbeck was proactively offered, and accepted, interim reinstatement before the court issued injunctive relief. 

"We are pleased that the Court rejected the National Labor Relations Board’s overreaching and inappropriate request for a nationwide cease-and-desist order as we continue to pursue a full legal review of the merits of the case," Starbucks said in a statement to Fox Business.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.
 
 
Copyright © 2010-2020 Livermore.com & California Media Partners, LLC. All rights reserved.