e10vk
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 0-27038
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-3156479
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1 Wayside Road
Burlington, Massachusetts
|
|
01803
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(781) 565-5000
SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
None
SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the outstanding common equity held
by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the last business day
of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter was approximately $1,514,563,908 based upon the last
reported sales price on the Nasdaq National Market for such
date. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of Common Stock
held by officers and directors of the Registrant and by persons
who hold more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock have been
excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.
This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily
conclusive.
The number of shares of the Registrants Common Stock,
outstanding as of November 30, 2006, was 170,981,880.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement to
be delivered to stockholders in connection with the
Registrants 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART I
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Federal securities laws that involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions that, if they never materialize or if they prove
incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from
those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
All statements other than statements of historical fact are
statements that could be deemed forward-looking, including
statements pertaining to: our revenue, earnings, cash flows and
liquidity; our strategy relating to speech and imaging
technologies; the potential of future product releases; our
product development plans and investments in research and
development; future acquisitions; international operations and
localized versions of our products; our contractual commitments;
our 2007 revenue expectations and legal proceedings and
litigation matters. You can identify these and other
forward-looking statements by the use of words such as
may, will, should,
expects, plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates,
predicts, intends,
potential, continue or the negative of
such terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking
statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating
to any of the foregoing statements. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including those set forth in this Annual Report under the
heading Risk Factors. All forward-looking statements
included in this document are based on information available to
us on the date hereof. We will not undertake and specifically
decline any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Introduction
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of speech and
imaging solutions for businesses and consumers around the world.
Our technologies, applications and services are transforming the
way people create, use and interact with information and make
the experience of our end users a more compelling, convenient
and satisfying one.
The value of our solutions is best realized in markets that are
information and process-intensive, such as healthcare,
telecommunications, financial services, legal services and
government administration. We deliver premier, comprehensive
technologies and services as an independent application or as
part of a larger integrated system. We are an active participant
in rapidly growing markets for speech, including healthcare
dictation and transcription, call center automation, mobile
search and communication and embedded technologies for consumer
products. In imaging, we are positioned to benefit from
increasing demand for PDF and networked imaging solutions.
Every day, millions of users and thousands of businesses
experience Nuance by calling directory assistance, getting
account information over a telephone, dictating patient records,
controlling mobile phones using their voice or reproducing
documents that can be shared and searched. As of
September 30, 2006, we have deployed thousands of speech
applications for some of the worlds most respected
companies, manufacturers and healthcare organizations. Our
imaging devices are used by millions of business professionals
and are included in hundreds of imaging devices and applications.
Today, we offer the worlds largest portfolio of speech and
imaging products backed by the expertise of our professional
services organization and a partner network that can create
solutions for businesses and organizations around the globe. We
market and distribute our products indirectly through a global
network of resellers comprising system integrators, independent
software vendors, value-added resellers, hardware vendors,
telecommunications carriers and distributors; and directly to
businesses and consumers through a dedicated direct sales force
and our
e-commerce
website (www.nuance.com).
Our business is predicated on providing our partners and
customers with a comprehensive portfolio of value-added
solutions, ensuring technological leadership, promoting the
broad adoption of our innovative technology and building global
sales and channel relationships. From our founding until 2001,
we focused exclusively on delivering imaging solutions that
simplified converting and managing information as it moved from
paper formats to electronic systems. In December 2001, we
entered the speech market through the acquisition of the
Speech & Language Technology Business from
Lernout & Hauspie. We believed speech solutions were a
natural complement
1
to our imaging solutions as both are developed, marketed and
delivered through similar resources and channels. We continue to
execute against our strategy of being the market leader in
speech solutions through the organic growth of our business as
well as through strategic acquisitions. We have successfully
completed 15 acquisitions since 2000 and we expect to
continue to make acquisitions of other companies, businesses and
technologies to complement our internal investments.
Acquisitions completed in recent fiscal years include the
following significant transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
On January 30, 2003, we acquired Royal Philips Electronics
Speech Processing Telephony and Voice Control business units to
expand our solutions for speech in call centers and within
automobiles and mobile devices.
|
|
|
|
On August 11, 2003, we acquired SpeechWorks International,
Inc. to broaden our speech applications for telecommunications,
call centers and embedded environments as well as establish a
professional services organization.
|
|
|
|
On February 1, 2005, we acquired Phonetic Systems Ltd. to
complement our solutions and expertise in automated directory
assistance and enterprise speech applications.
|
|
|
|
On September 15, 2005, we acquired the former Nuance
Communications, Inc., which we refer to as Former Nuance, to
expand our portfolio of technologies, applications and services
for call center automation, customer self service and directory
assistance.
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2006, we acquired Dictaphone Corporation, a
leading healthcare information technology company that provides
a broad range of digital dictation, transcription, and report
management system solutions.
|
To partially finance our acquisition of Dictaphone, on
March 31, 2006 we entered into a new senior secured credit
facility which consists of a $355.0 million
7-year term
loan and a $75.0 million six-year revolving credit line.
Nuance was incorporated in 1992 as Visioneer, Inc. under the
laws of the state of Delaware. In 1999, we changed our name to
ScanSoft, Inc. and also changed our ticker symbol to SSFT. In
October 2004, we changed our fiscal year end to
September 30, resulting in a nine-month fiscal year for
2004. In October 2005, we changed our name to Nuance
Communications, Inc., to reflect our core mission of being the
worlds most comprehensive and innovative provider of
speech solutions, and in November 2005 we changed our ticker
symbol to NUAN. Except as otherwise indicated, all references in
this report to Nuance, the Company,
we, our or ScanSoft, refer
to Nuance Communications, Inc.
Market
Opportunity
In the past decade, information has become an increasingly
important resource for businesses and enterprises. The ability
to access, exchange and manage information with speed and
sophistication through various means information
systems, dictation processes, call centers, documents, mobile
devices is often an important characteristic of the
most successful organizations worldwide. Many organizations
define their strategy and assess their ability to compete and
manage their customer relationships based on the quality,
diversity and availability of their information products,
services and resources. The format of vital information is wide
and varied, ranging from the spoken word in multiple languages
to customer database systems to paper, electronic files and
Internet content.
Confronted by exponentially increasing information through more
and more channels, consumers, business personnel and healthcare
professionals employ a variety of resources for retrieving
information, transcribing patient information, conducting
transactions and performing their jobs. The Internet,
telecommunications systems, wireless and mobile networks and
related corporate infrastructure have emerged as powerful global
communications networks and channels for conducting business.
These electronic systems have fundamentally changed the way
organizations and consumers obtain information, communicate,
purchase goods and conduct business. Today, businesses and
manufacturers around the world share a common motivation to
enhance the service they provide to their customers and
differentiate their offerings while improving operating
efficiency. Customer satisfaction, employee productivity and
company operating results can often be linked to an
organizations ability to manage, utilize and communicate
information effectively.
2
Nuance
Solutions
We create technologies, applications and solutions that
transform the way people access, share, manage and use
information, both in business and in daily life. We help
enterprises, professionals and consumers increase productivity,
reduce costs and save time by developing and commercializing new
technologies that make the user experience more compelling and
productive. Our speech offerings utilize the human voice, and we
are advancing towards our vision of the future where natural
conversations will be the preferred interface for these
interactions and will make the user experience more compelling.
Our imaging solutions build on decades of experience and
technology development to deliver businesses, manufacturers and
consumers a broad set of PDF and document offerings.
We provide a broad set of speech and imaging offerings to our
customers that increase their end users productivity,
reduce costs and save time in the following areas:
Customer
Care and Call Center Automation
Organizations turn to our speech solutions as a means to improve
the quality of their customer care while reducing the associated
costs and ensuring a positive customer experience. Our speech
solutions allow users to direct their own calls, obtain
information and conduct transactions by simply speaking
naturally over any telephone.
Our speech solutions are used within a wide range of
applications across many customer-service intensive sectors,
including financial services, telecommunications, healthcare,
utilities, government, travel and entertainment. For example,
our software is integrated into applications that provide flight
information, personal banking, equipment repair and claims
processing. We provide an extensive portfolio of speech
technologies and applications that offer superior accuracy,
support up to 49 languages and dialects for our speech
recognition and offer 26 languages in our natural sounding
synthesized speech. Our solutions adhere to global industry
standards and we provide speech technologies and services in
more languages than any other vendor worldwide.
These speech solutions are licensed to enterprises, such as
those in the Fortune 1000, and telecommunications carriers.
Although in certain cases we sell directly to our customer, the
majority of our solutions are fulfilled through our channel
networks comprised of telecommunications equipment companies,
systems integrators and technology providers, such as Avaya,
Cisco, Genesys, Intervoice and Nortel, that integrate our
solutions into their proprietary hardware and software platforms.
We complement our technologies and products with a global
professional services organization that supports customers and
partners with business and systems consulting project
management, user interface design and application development
assistance. We service our customers from our corporate
headquarters in Burlington, Massachusetts and through other
principal offices located in the United States, Canada, Belgium,
Israel and Japan.
Healthcare
Dictation and Transcription
The healthcare industry is under pressure to streamline
operations and reduce costs while at the same time find new ways
to improve patient care. In recent years, the healthcare
industry comprising hospitals, clinics, medical
groups, physicians offices, insurance providers and
service organizations has increasingly turned to
speech solutions to automate manual processes, especially with
respect to dictation and transcription.
Today, clinical documentation is based largely on the manual
transcription of recorded physician dictation, representing a
significant industry worldwide. This presents an opportunity for
us to apply speech technologies to automate manual processes,
reduce costs, speed access to accurate data, and significantly
improve patient care.
We are a leading supplier of speech recognition solutions to the
healthcare industry through desktop and integrated OEM dictation
products, and recently through complete transcription processing
and workflow solutions. In March 2006, we acquired Dictaphone
Corporation to expand our product portfolio, market reach and
revenue streams within the large and rapidly growing healthcare
vertical.
Today, more than 3,000 hospitals, clinics, and group practices,
and over 400,000 physicians, use our Dictaphone healthcare
solutions to manage the dictation and transcription of patient
records. Our voice platform helps reduce the high cost of
medical reporting, manage both a traditional transcription
workflow and the use of in-
3
house speech recognition and reduce the reliance on manual
transcription. Our enterprise-level speech recognition includes
phone-based dictation, transcriptionist editing tools and
physician self-completion control.
Desktop
Dictation
Our desktop dictation applications increase productivity by
using speech to create documents, streamline repetitive and
complex tasks, input data, complete forms and automate manual
transcription processes. The Dragon NaturallySpeaking family of
products delivers enhanced productivity for professionals and
consumers who need to create documents and transcripts.
Professionals and consumers also look to our dictation solutions
as a way to maximize the productivity of their existing workers,
including those with disabilities, and to comply with government
requirements relating to workplace safety and accessibility.
Our Dragon NaturallySpeaking solutions allow users to
automatically convert speech into text at up to
160 words-per-minute.
Our software supports a vocabulary of more than 300,000 words
that can be expanded by users to include specialized words and
phrases, is designed to adapt to individual voice patterns and
accents and is able to achieve accuracy rates of up to 99%.
We offer a range of desktop and server solutions, each with
features that match a specific customer target. Our dictation
software is currently available in eight languages. We utilize a
combination of our global reseller network and direct sales to
distribute our speech recognition and dictation products.
Embedded
Speech for Mobile Devices and Consumer Products
Voice capabilities are becoming ubiquitous in consumer and
mobile devices, from cell phones and PDAs to automobiles and
navigation systems. Our embedded speech solutions add voice
control capabilities to these devices, allowing people to use
spoken words or commands for dialing a mobile phone by saying a
name, entering destination information into an automotive
navigation system, dictating a text message or having emails and
screen information read aloud.
Our embedded speech solutions identify specific words and
phrases at any moment in time and convert these spoken words
into instructions that control specific functions within
applications. Our solutions support dynamic vocabularies and
have sophisticated noise management capabilities that improve
accuracy, even in noisy environments. Our products scale to meet
the size and accuracy requirements for automotive and navigation
systems and offer rapid application development tools, extensive
compatibility with hardware and operating systems and support of
multiple languages.
Our embedded speech solutions are used by automobile, cell
phone, entertainment and aftermarket system manufacturers and
their suppliers including Alpine, Bosch-Blaupunkt, Delphi,
General Motors, LG, Microsoft, Motorola, Nokia, Pioneer,
Samsung, Sony and Visteon. These technologies are included as
part of a larger system, application or solution that is
designed, manufactured and sold by our customers. These
customers include handset and other device manufacturers and
tier-one suppliers; companies whose size and importance qualify
them to be direct suppliers to the major automotive
manufacturers as well as in-dash radio, navigation system and
other electronic device manufacturers.
Mobile
Search and Communication
The mobile device and wireless phone market is one of the
fastest growing technology markets in the world and the
opportunity to provide content, advertising, and services
creates a significant opportunity. While many phones and devices
today have Web and data capabilities, advanced mobile phone
functionality and much of the available mobile content remains
virtually invisible to users because it is too deeply hidden in
confusing menu hierarchies. We believe speech technology
provides a means to overcome these challenges and create growth
for mobile services.
Our mobile speech solutions, comprising elements from many of
our dictation, network and embedded speech solutions, offer an
innovative approach to accessing search and communications
services on mobile devices. We offer user interaction with
mobile search and communications applications that enable
consumers to significantly
4
increase the utility of their mobile devices, while enabling
handset vendors and service providers to tap into significant
new sources of revenue.
Our search and communication solutions allow consumers to use
their voices to browse and download mobile content including
ringtones, music, videos, wallpapers, and games; search local
information databases for business listings, yellow pages,
restaurant guides and movie schedules by naturally speaking
their requests; dictate text messages to mobile instant
messaging and mobile email dictation significantly faster than
with the keypad; and allow wireless subscribers to access their
personal or public address books, calendar and a range of
information services using simple speech commands.
PDF
and Document Imaging Solutions
Our PDF and document imaging solutions help businesses and
consumers by automating a range of document
processes increasing productivity, saving time and
reducing costs. With products for enterprises,
small-to-medium-sized
businesses and home offices, our ScanSoft Imaging Solutions
offer cost-effective PDF applications for business users;
convert paper and PDF into documents that can be easily edited;
and simplify scanning and document management using
multifunction scanners and networked digital copiers.
Our OmniPage product family uses optical character recognition
technology to deliver highly accurate document and PDF
conversion, replacing the need to manually re-create documents.
Our OmniPage applications are used by individuals and in
professional office settings. We utilize a combination of our
global reseller network and direct sales to distribute our
document conversion and PDF products. We license our software to
companies such as Brother, Canon, Dell, HP and Xerox, which
bundle our solutions with multifunction devices, digital
copiers, printers and scanners. We also license software
development toolkits to independent software vendors who use our
technology for production capture or desktop applications,
including vendors such as Autodesk, Canon,
EMC/Captiva,
Filenet, Kofax, Microsoft, Sharp and Verity.
Our PaperPort product family converts paper into digital
documents that can be easily archived, retrieved and shared. Our
software can be used in conjunction with network scanning
devices to preserve an image of a document exactly as it appears
on paper. Our software automatically indexes the scanned image
so that it can be stored together with other digital documents
on a desktop, over a network or within an enterprise content
management system. We utilize a combination of our global
reseller network and direct sales to distribute our digital
paper management products. We also license our software to
companies such as Brother, Hewlett-Packard, and Xerox, who
bundle our solutions with multifunction devices, digital
copiers, printers and scanners.
Our PDF Converter product family comprises affordable solutions
used to create PDF files and turn existing PDF files into
fully-formatted Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel and Corel
WordPerfect documents that can be edited. Our PDF solutions are
used by business professionals and consumers and have proven to
be a cost-effective alternative to those offered by Adobe
Systems. PDF Converter Professional, our flagship PDF
application, allows users to view, manipulate and edit PDF
documents as well as create and complete PDF forms. PDF Create!
is an affordable solution to enable the creation of PDF from all
PC applications, including support for PDF security, font
embedding and other advanced features.
Sales,
Marketing and Distribution
We market and distribute our products through a variety of
means, including indirectly through a global network of
resellers, comprising system integrators, independent software
vendors, value-added resellers, hardware vendors,
telecommunications carriers and distributors and directly
through our dedicated direct sales force and through our
e-commerce
website (www.nuance.com).
We have established relationships with more than 2,000 channel
partners, including leading system vendors, independent software
vendors, value-added resellers and distributors, through whom we
market and distribute our products and solutions. In speech,
companies such as Avaya, Bosch-Blaupunkt, Cisco, Delphi,
Genesys, LG, Microsoft, Nokia, Nortel, Samsung and Visteon embed
our technologies into telecommunications systems and automotive,
PC, handset, healthcare or multimedia applications. In Imaging,
companies such as Brother, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Visioneer and
Xerox include our technology in digital copiers, printers and
scanners, as well as
5
multifunction devices that combine these capabilities and
companies such as Corel, Canon, Captiva, Kofax, Sharp and Verity
embed our imaging technology into their commercial software
applications.
We license our applications to enterprises, professionals and
consumers through distribution and fulfillment partners,
including 1450, Ingram Micro, Tech Data and Digital River. These
distribution and fulfillment partners provide our products to
computer superstores, consumer electronic stores, eCommerce Web
sites, mail order houses and office superstores, such as
Amazon.com, Best Buy, CDW, MicroWarehouse, Circuit City,
CompUSA, Frys Electronics, Office Depot, PC Connection and
Staples.
As of September 30, 2006, we had 448 full-time
employees in sales and marketing, with 298 in the
United States and 150 internationally.
Research
and Development/Intellectual Property
In recent years, we have developed and acquired extensive
technology assets, intellectual property and industry expertise
in speech and imaging which provide us with a competitive
advantage in markets where we compete. Our technologies are
based on complex mathematical formulas which require extensive
amounts of linguistic and image data, acoustic models and
recognition techniques. A significant investment in capital and
time would be necessary to replicate our current capabilities.
We continue to invest in our technologies to maintain our
market-leading position and to develop new applications. Our
technologies are covered by more than 550 patents or patent
applications, expiring on various dates between 2006 and 2023.
Our intellectual property, whether purchased and included as an
asset on our balance sheet, or developed internally and thus not
generally included as an asset on our balance sheet, is critical
to our success and competitive position and, ultimately, to our
market value. We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights,
trademarks, services marks, trade secrets, confidentiality
provisions and licensing arrangements to establish and protect
our intellectual property and proprietary rights.
As of September 30, 2006, we had 417 full-time
employees in research and development. Our research and
development expenses for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the nine months ending
September 30, 2004 were $59.4 million,
$39.2 million and $26.4 million, respectively.
International
Operations
Our international headquarters are located in Belgium and we
have additional principal offices in a number of international
locations including: Canada, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Japan and
the United Kingdom. The responsibilities of our international
operations include research and development, customer support,
sales and marketing and administration. Additionally, we
maintain smaller sales, services and support offices throughout
the world to support our international customers and to expand
international revenue opportunities.
Geographic revenue classification is based on the geographic
areas in which our customers are located. For fiscal 2006, 2005
and 2004, 74%, 69% and 70% of revenue was generated in the
United States and 26%, 31% and 30% of revenue was generated by
our international operations, respectively.
For a discussion of risks attendant to our international
operations, see Risk Factors A significant
portion of our revenue is derived from sales in Europe and Asia.
Our results could be harmed by economic, political, regulatory
and other risks associated with these and other international
regions.
Strategy
We focus on providing competitive and value-added solutions for
our customers and partners through a broad set of technologies,
service offerings and channel capabilities. To continue to
provide industry leading solutions, through acquisitions and
organic growth, we intend to:
Participate Broadly In Speech. We intend to
leverage our comprehensive technologies and leadership in speech
to expand our opportunities in the call center, automotive,
healthcare, telecommunications and mobile markets. We also
intend to pursue emerging opportunities to use our speech
technologies within consumer devices, games and other embedded
applications. To expand our position in speech, we intend to
introduce new versions of
6
our products and applications complete new license agreements
with customers and partners that will resell our technologies;
and continue to make strategic acquisitions that we believe
complement our existing capabilities in the telecommunications,
automotive and electronics markets.
Pursue Opportunities for Dictation and Transcription in
Healthcare. We intend to increase our investments
and efforts in providing dictation solutions to the healthcare
market, where we believe there is a large and attractive
opportunity to automate transcription processes and information
workflow. We have formed a healthcare-specific sales
organization to aggressively pursue sales into healthcare
provider organizations; expanded our reseller and system
integrator channels within healthcare; and entered into OEM
license agreements with leading healthcare IT hardware and
software vendors.
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions. We have
selectively pursued strategic acquisitions to expand our
technology, channel and service resources and to complement our
organic growth. We expect to continue to make acquisitions of
other companies, businesses and technologies to complement our
existing capabilities and our internal investments in these
areas and have a team that focuses on evaluating market needs
and potential acquisitions to fulfill them. We have a
disciplined methodology for integrating acquired companies and
businesses after the transaction is complete.
Expand Worldwide Channels. We intend to expand
our global channel network and build upon our existing
distribution channels, especially in Europe, Asia and Latin
America. Along these lines, we have added sales employees in
different geographic regions and launched programs and events to
help recruit new partners for our channel network.
Expand PDF and Imaging Solutions. We intend to
enhance the value and functionality of our PDF and imaging
solutions to enable enterprises to address the proliferation of
PDF, the expanded use of content management systems and the
widespread adoption of networked multifunction and digital
scanning devices. We intend to continue to introduce new and
improved versions of our products to take advantage of
developing market opportunities. We also plan to enhance our
software development toolkits so our technologies can be
integrated with more third-party and OEM solutions.
Competition
The individual markets in which we compete are highly
competitive and are subject to rapid technology changes. There
are a number of companies that develop or may develop products
that compete in our target markets; however, currently there is
no one company that competes with us in all of our product
areas. While we expect competition to continue to increase both
from existing competitors and new market entrants, we believe
that we will compete effectively based on many factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Technological Superiority. Our speech and
imaging technologies, applications and solutions are often
recognized as the most proficient products in their respective
categories. Our speech technology has industry-leading
recognition accuracy and provides a natural, speech-enabled
interaction with systems, devices and applications. Our imaging
technology is viewed as the most accurate in the industry, with
rates as high as 99.8%. Technology publications, analyst
research and independent benchmarks have indicated our products
rank at or above performance levels of alternative solutions.
|
|
|
|
Broad Distribution Channels. Our extensive
global network of resellers, comprising system integrators,
independent software vendors, value-added resellers, hardware
vendors, telecommunications carriers and distributors; our
dedicated direct sales force; and, our
e-commerce
website (www.nuance.com) enables us to address the
needs of specific markets, such as financial, legal, healthcare
and government, and introduce new products quickly and
effectively.
|
|
|
|
International Appeal. The international reach
of our products is due to the broad language coverage of our
offerings, including our speech technology which provides
recognition for up to 49 languages and dialects and natural
sounding synthesized speech in 26 languages and supports a
broad range of hardware platforms and operating systems. Our
imaging technology supports more than 100 languages. We
currently have a significant portion of our operations located
outside of the United States, including 259 employees in
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
research and development, 150 employees in sales and marketing
and 137 employees providing professional services and other
post-sales support activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialized Professional Services. Our
superior technology when coupled with the high quality of our
professional services, allows our customers and partners to
place a high degree of confidence and trust in our ability to
deliver results.
|
Within speech, we compete with AT&T, Fonix, IBM, Loquendo,
Microsoft, Philips, Telisma and Voice Signal. Within healthcare
dictation and transcription, we compete with Philips Medical,
Spheris and other smaller providers. Within imaging, we compete
directly with ABBYY, Adobe, eCopy, and I.R.I.S. In speech, some
of our partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Edify, Genesys and Nortel
develop and market products that can be considered substitutes
for our solutions. In addition, a number of smaller companies in
both speech and imaging produce technologies or products that
are competitive with our solutions in some markets. Current and
potential competitors have established, or may establish,
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties
to increase the ability of their technologies to address the
needs of our prospective customers.
Some of our competitors or potential competitors in our markets,
such as Adobe, IBM and Microsoft, have significantly greater
financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. These
competitors may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to
new or emerging technologies or changes in customer
requirements. They may also devote greater resources to the
development, promotion and sale of their products than we do.
See Risk Factors The markets in which we
operate are highly competitive and rapidly changing, and we may
be unable to compete successfully.
Employees
As of September 30, 2006, Nuance employed
1,681 full-time employees worldwide in 16 countries,
including 448 in sales and marketing, 417 in research and
development, 329 in professional service consulting, 211 in
customer service and support and 276 in general and
administration, including information services personnel. Our
employees are not represented by any labor union and are not
organized under a collective bargaining agreement, and we have
never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our
relationships with our employees are generally good.
Company
Information
Our website is located at www.nuance.com. This Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
our Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to these reports, as well as proxy statements
and other information we file with or furnish to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) are accessible free of
charge on our website. We make these documents available as soon
as reasonably practicable after we file them with, or furnish
them to, the SEC. Except as otherwise stated in these documents,
the information contained on our website or available by
hyperlink from our website is not incorporated by reference into
this report or any other documents we file with or furnish to
the SEC.
You should carefully consider the risks described below when
evaluating our company and when deciding whether to invest in
our company. The risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we do not currently believe are
important to an investor may also harm our business operations.
If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions
described in the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or our results of operations could be
seriously harmed. If that happens, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of the
value of any of our shares held by you.
8
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to
period, and this may cause our stock price to
decline.
Our revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past
and we expect our revenue and operating results to continue to
fluctuate in the future. Given this fluctuation, we believe that
quarter to quarter comparisons of our revenue and operating
results are not necessarily meaningful or an accurate indicator
of our future performance. As a result, our results of
operations may not meet the expectations of securities analysts
or investors in the future. If this occurs, the price of our
stock would likely decline. Factors that contribute to
fluctuations in our operating results include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
slowing sales by our distribution and fulfillment partners to
their customers, which may place pressure on these partners to
reduce purchases of our products;
|
|
|
|
volume, timing and fulfillment of customer orders;
|
|
|
|
our efforts to generate additional revenue from our portfolio of
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
concentration of operations with one manufacturing partner and
ability to control expenses related to the manufacture,
packaging and shipping of our boxed software products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying their purchasing decisions in anticipation of
new versions of our products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying, canceling or limiting their purchases as a
result of the threat or results of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
seasonality in purchasing patterns of our customers;
|
|
|
|
reduction in the prices of our products in response to
competition or market conditions;
|
|
|
|
returns and allowance charges in excess of accrued amounts;
|
|
|
|
timing of significant marketing and sales promotions;
|
|
|
|
impairment charges against goodwill and other intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
write-offs of excess or obsolete inventory and accounts
receivable that are not collectible;
|
|
|
|
increased expenditures incurred pursuing new product or market
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends as they affect retail and corporate
sales; and
|
|
|
|
higher than anticipated costs related to fixed-price contracts
with our customers.
|
Due to the foregoing factors, among others, our revenue and
operating results are difficult to forecast. Our expense levels
are based in significant part on our expectations of future
revenue, and we may not be able to reduce our expenses quickly
to respond to a shortfall in projected revenue. Therefore, our
failure to meet revenue expectations would seriously harm our
operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We
have grown, and may continue to grow, through acquisitions,
which could dilute our existing shareholders and could involve
substantial integration risks.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. In connection with past acquisitions, we issued a
substantial number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration and also incurred significant debt to finance the
cash consideration used for our acquisition of Dictaphone
Corporation. We may continue to issue equity securities for
future acquisitions that would dilute our existing stockholders,
perhaps significantly depending on the terms of the acquisition.
We may also incur additional debt in connection with future
acquisitions, which, if available at all, may place additional
restrictions on our ability to operate our business.
Furthermore, our prior acquisitions required substantial
9
integration and management efforts. Our recently completed
acquisition of Dictaphone Corporation will likely pose similar
challenges. Acquisitions of this nature involve a number of
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty in transitioning and integrating the operations and
personnel of the acquired businesses, including different and
complex accounting and financial reporting systems;
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulty in successfully implementing, upgrading and
deploying in a timely and effective manner new operational
information systems and upgrades of our finance, accounting and
product distribution systems;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into
our products and technology;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired
development projects and technology integration;
|
|
|
|
management of geographically remote units both in the United
States and internationally;
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with partners and customers;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying purchases of our products pending resolution
of product integration between our existing and our newly
acquired products;
|
|
|
|
entering markets or types of businesses in which we have limited
experience; and
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of the acquired company.
|
As a result of these and other risks, we may not realize
anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. Any failure to
achieve these benefits or failure to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies could seriously harm our
business.
Purchase
accounting treatment of our acquisitions could decrease our net
income in the foreseeable future, which could have a material
and adverse effect on the market value of our common
stock.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, we have accounted for our acquisitions using
the purchase method of accounting. Under purchase accounting, we
record the market value of our common stock or other form of
consideration issued in connection with the acquisition and the
amount of direct transaction costs as the cost of acquiring the
company or business. We have allocated that cost to the
individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including
various identifiable intangible assets such as acquired
technology, acquired trade names and acquired customer
relationships based on their respective fair values. Intangible
assets generally will be amortized over a five to ten year
period. Goodwill and certain intangible assets with indefinite
lives, are not subject to amortization but is subject to at
least an annual impairment analysis, which may result in an
impairment charge if the carrying value exceeds its implied fair
value. As of September 30, 2006, we had identified
intangible assets amounting to approximately $220.0 million
and goodwill of approximately $699.3 million.
Our
significant debt could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our credit
facility.
We have a significant amount of debt. On March 31, 2006, we
entered into a credit facility which consists of a
$355.0 million
7-year term
loan and a $75.0 million six-year revolving credit line. As
of September 30, 2006, $353.2 million remained
outstanding under the term loan and there were no outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line. Our high level of
debt could have important consequences, for example it could:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to use of a large portion of our cash flow to pay
principal and interest on the credit facility, which will reduce
the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital,
capital expenditures, research and development expenditures and
other business activities;
|
|
|
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting
business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants
in our debt, our ability to borrow additional funds, dispose of
assets or pay cash dividends.
|
In addition, a substantial portion of our debt bears interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, our debt
service requirements will increase, which would adversely affect
our cash flow. While we have entered into an interest rate swap
agreement limiting our exposure for a portion of our debt, such
agreement does not offer complete protection from this risk.
We
have a history of operating losses, and we may incur losses in
the future, which may require us to raise additional capital on
unfavorable terms.
We reported net losses of approximately $22.9 million,
$5.4 million and $9.4 million for fiscal years 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of
approximately $190.1 million at September 30, 2006. If
we are unable to achieve and maintain profitability, the market
price for our stock may decline, perhaps substantially. We
cannot assure you that our revenue will grow or that we will
achieve or maintain profitability in the future. If we do not
achieve profitability, we may be required to raise additional
capital to maintain or grow our operations. The terms of any
additional capital, if available at all, may be highly dilutive
to existing investors or contain other unfavorable terms, such
as a high interest rate and restrictive covenants.
We
depend on limited or sole source suppliers for critical
components. The inability to obtain sufficient components as
required, and under favorable purchase terms, would harm our
business.
We are dependent on certain suppliers, including limited and
sole source suppliers, to provide key components used in our
products. We have experienced, and may continue to experience,
delays in component deliveries, which in turn could cause delays
in product shipments and require the redesign of certain
products. In addition, if we are unable to procure necessary
components under favorable purchase terms, including at
favorable prices and with the order lead-times needed for the
efficient and profitable operation of our business, our results
of operations could suffer.
Speech
technologies may not achieve widespread acceptance by
businesses, which could limit our ability to grow our speech
business.
We have invested and expect to continue to invest heavily in the
acquisition, development and marketing of speech technologies.
The market for speech technologies is relatively new and rapidly
evolving. Our ability to increase revenue in the future depends
in large measure on acceptance of speech technologies in general
and our products in particular. The continued development of the
market for our current and future speech solutions will also
depend on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
consumer demand for speech-enabled applications;
|
|
|
|
development by third-party vendors of applications using speech
technologies; and
|
|
|
|
continuous improvement in speech technology.
|
Sales of our speech products would be harmed if the market for
speech software does not continue to develop or develops more
slowly than we expect, and, consequently, our business could be
harmed and we may not recover the costs associated with our
investment in our speech technologies.
The
markets in which we operate are highly competitive and rapidly
changing, and we may be unable to compete
successfully.
There are a number of companies that develop or may develop
products that compete in our targeted markets. The individual
markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and are
rapidly changing. Within imaging, we compete directly with
ABBYY, Adobe, I.R.I.S. and NewSoft. Within speech, we compete
with AT&T, Fonix, IBM, Microsoft and Philips. Within
healthcare dictation and transcription, we compete with Philips
Medical, Spheris and other smaller providers. In speech, some of
our partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Edify, Genesys and Nortel
develop and market products that can be considered substitutes
for our solutions. In addition, a number of smaller companies
11
in both speech and imaging produce technologies or products that
are in some markets competitive with our solutions. Current and
potential competitors have established, or may establish,
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties
to increase the ability of their technologies to address the
needs of our prospective customers.
The competition in these markets could adversely affect our
operating results by reducing the volume of the products we
license or the prices we can charge. Some of our current or
potential competitors, such as Adobe, IBM and Microsoft, have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. These competitors may be able to respond
more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or
changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we do.
Some of our customers, such as IBM and Microsoft, have developed
or acquired products or technologies that compete with our
products and technologies. These customers may give higher
priority to the sale of these competitive products or
technologies. To the extent they do so, market acceptance and
penetration of our products, and therefore our revenue, may be
adversely affected.
Our success will depend substantially upon our ability to
enhance our products and technologies and to develop and
introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products
and features that meet changing customer requirements and
incorporate technological advancements. If we are unable to
develop new products and enhance functionalities or technologies
to adapt to these changes, or if we are unable to realize
synergies among our acquired products and technologies, our
business will suffer.
The
failure to successfully maintain the adequacy of our system of
internal control over financial reporting could have a material
adverse impact on our ability to report our financial results in
an accurate and timely manner.
Our managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting, as of
September 30, 2005, identified a material weakness in our
internal controls related to tax accounting, primarily as a
result of a lack of necessary corporate accounting resources and
ineffective execution of certain controls designed to prevent or
detect actual or potential misstatements in the tax accounts.
While we have taken remediation measures to correct this
material weakness, which measures are more fully described in
Item 9A of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we cannot assure you that we will not have material weaknesses
in our internal controls in the future. Any failure in the
effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial
reporting could have a material adverse impact on our ability to
report our financial results in an accurate and timely manner.
A
significant portion of our revenue is derived from sales in
Europe and Asia. Our results could be harmed by economic,
political, regulatory and other risks associated with these and
other international regions.
Since we license our products worldwide, our business is subject
to risks associated with doing business internationally. We
anticipate that revenue from international operations will
continue to increase in their total U.S. dollar value.
Reported international revenue, classified by the major
geographic areas in which our customers are located, for fiscal
2006, 2005 and 2004 represented approximately
$100.2 million, $71.5 million and $39.4 million,
respectively. Most of our international revenue is generated by
sales in Europe and Asia. In addition, some of our products are
developed and manufactured outside the United States. A
significant portion of the development and manufacturing of our
speech products are completed in Belgium, and a significant
portion of our imaging research and development is conducted in
Hungary. In connection with the Philips acquisition, we added an
additional research and development location in Aachen, Germany,
and in connection with the acquisitions of Locus Dialog and the
former Nuance Communications, In., which we refer to as Former
Nuance, we added additional research and development centers in
Montreal, Canada. Our acquisitions of ART and Phonetic added
research and development and professional services operations in
Tel Aviv, Israel. Accordingly, our future results could be
harmed by a variety of factors associated with international
sales and operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions economic
conditions;
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism and war;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements imposed by the United States or by other countries;
|
|
|
|
compliance with foreign and domestic laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
negative consequences from changes in applicable tax laws;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing operations in multiple
locations in many countries;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting trade accounts receivable in other
countries; and
|
|
|
|
less effective protection of intellectual property.
|
We are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Because we have international subsidiaries and distributors that
operate and sell our products outside the United States, we are
exposed to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates or declining economic conditions in these countries. In
certain circumstances, we have entered into forward exchange
contracts to hedge against foreign currency fluctuations on
intercompany balances with our foreign subsidiaries. We use
these contracts to reduce our risk associated with exchange rate
movements, as the gains or losses on these contracts are
intended to offset any exchange rate losses or gains on the
hedged transaction. We do not engage in foreign currency
speculation. Hedges are designated and documented at the
inception of the hedge and are evaluated for effectiveness
monthly. Forward exchange contracts hedging firm commitments
qualify for hedge accounting when they are designated as a hedge
of the foreign currency exposure and they are effective in
minimizing such exposure. With our increased international
presence in a number of geographic locations and with
international revenue projected to increase in fiscal 2007, we
are exposed to changes in foreign currencies including the Euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Israeli New Shekel
and the Hungarian Forint. Changes in the value of the Euro or
other foreign currencies relative to the value of the
U.S. dollar could adversely affect future revenue and
operating results.
Impairment
of our intangible assets could result in significant charges
which would adversely impact our future operating
results.
We have significant intangible assets, including goodwill and
intangibles with indefinite lives, which are susceptible to
valuation adjustments as a result of changes in various factors
or conditions. The most significant intangible assets are
patents and core technology, completed technology, customer
relationships and trademarks. Customer relationships are
amortized on an accelerated basis based upon the pattern in
which the economic benefit of customer relationships are being
utilized. Other identifiable intangible assets are amortized on
a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We
assess the potential impairment of identifiable intangible
assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors which could
trigger an impairment of such assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained
period; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact our
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified. As of September 30, 2006, we had
identified intangible assets amounting to approximately
$220.0 million and goodwill of approximately
$699.3 million.
13
If we
are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business
could be harmed.
If any of our key employees were to leave us, we could face
substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could
experience a loss in productivity while any successor obtains
the necessary training and experience. Our employment
relationships are generally at-will and we have had key
employees leave us in the past. We cannot assure you that one or
more key employees will not leave us in the future. We intend to
continue to hire additional highly qualified personnel,
including software engineers and operational personnel, but we
may not be able to attract, assimilate or retain qualified
personnel in the future. Any failure to attract, integrate,
motivate and retain these employees could harm our business.
Our
medical transcription services may be subject to legal claims
for failure to comply with laws governing the confidentiality of
medical records.
Healthcare professionals who use our medical transcription
services deliver to us health information about their patients
including information that constitutes a record under applicable
law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal
and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual
obligations govern collection, dissemination, use and
confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws;
|
|
|
|
our contracts with customers and partners;
|
|
|
|
state laws regulating healthcare professionals;
|
|
|
|
Medicaid laws; and
|
|
|
|
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing
Administration.
|
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal
privacy and security standards for the use and protection of
protected health information. Any failure by us or by our
personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may
result in a material liability to us.
Although we have systems and policies in place for safeguarding
protected health information from unauthorized disclosure, these
systems and policies may not preclude claims against us for
alleged violations of applicable requirements. There can be no
assurance that we will not be subject to liability claims which
could have a material adverse affect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property and Technology
Unauthorized
use of our proprietary technology and intellectual property will
adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Our success and competitive position depend in large part on our
ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property rights
protecting our products and services. We rely on a combination
of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade
secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements
to establish and protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
aspects of our products or to obtain, license, sell or otherwise
use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing
unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we may not be
able to protect our technology from unauthorized use.
Additionally, our competitors may independently develop
technologies that are substantially the same or superior to ours
and that do not infringe our rights. In these cases, we would be
unable to prevent our competitors from selling or licensing
these similar or superior technologies. In addition, the laws of
some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to
the same extent as the laws of the United States. Although the
source code for our proprietary software is protected both as a
trade secret and as a copyrighted work, litigation may be
necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, to
protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope
of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend against claims
of infringement or invalidity. Litigation, regardless of the
outcome, can be very expensive and can divert management efforts.
14
Third
parties have claimed and may claim in the future that we are
infringing their intellectual property, and we could be exposed
to significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented
from selling our products if such claims are
successful.
From time to time, we are subject to claims that we or our
customers may be infringing or contributing to the infringement
of the intellectual property rights of others. We may be unaware
of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of
our technologies and products. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. However, we may not be able to obtain licenses from some
or all claimants, the terms of any offered licenses may not be
acceptable to us, and we may not be able to resolve disputes
without litigation. Any litigation regarding intellectual
property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert the
attention of our management and key personnel from our business
operations. In the event of a claim of intellectual property
infringement, we may be required to enter into costly royalty or
license agreements. Third parties claiming intellectual property
infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to develop and
sell our products.
On November 9, 2006, VoiceSignal Technologies, Inc. filed
an action against us and eleven of our resellers in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas claiming
patent infringement. Damages were sought in an unspecified
amount. In the lawsuit, VoiceSignal alleges that we are
infringing United States Patent No. 5,855,000 which is
related to improving correction in a dictation application based
on a two input analysis. We believe these claims have no merit
and intend to defend the actions vigorously.
On May 31, 2006 GTX Corporation (GTX), filed an
action against us in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas claiming patent infringement. Damages
were sought in an unspecified amount. In the lawsuit, GTX
alleged that we are infringing United States Patent
No. 7,016,536 entitled Method and Apparatus for
Automatic Cleaning and Enhancing of Scanned Documents. We
believe these claims have no merit and intend to defend the
action vigorously.
On November 27, 2002, AllVoice Computing plc
(AllVoice) filed an action against us in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
claiming patent infringement. In the lawsuit, AllVoice alleges
that we are infringing United States Patent No. 5,799,273
entitled Automated Proofreading Using Interface Linking
Recognized Words to their Audio Data While Text is Being
Changed (the 273 Patent). The 273
Patent generally discloses techniques for manipulating audio
data associated with text generated by a speech recognition
engine. Although we have several products in the speech
recognition technology field, we believe that our products do
not infringe the 273 Patent because, in addition to other
defenses, they do not use the claimed techniques. Damages are
sought in an unspecified amount. We filed an Answer on
December 23, 2002. The United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas entered summary judgment against
AllVoice and dismissed all claims against Nuance on
February 21, 2006. AllVoice filed a notice of appeal from
this judgment on April 26, 2006.
We believe that the final outcome of the current litigation
matters described above will not have a significant adverse
effect on our financial position and results of operations.
However, even if our defense is successful, the litigation could
require significant management time and could be costly. Should
we not prevail in these litigation matters, we may be unable to
sell and/or
license certain of our technologies we consider to be
proprietary, and our operating results, financial position and
cash flows could be adversely impacted.
Our
software products may have bugs, which could result in delayed
or lost revenue, expensive correction, liability to our
customers and claims against us.
Complex software products such as ours may contain errors,
defects or bugs. Defects in the solutions or products that we
develop and sell to our customers could require expensive
corrections and result in delayed or lost revenue, adverse
customer reaction and negative publicity about us or our
products and services. Customers who are not satisfied with any
of our products may also bring claims against us for damages,
which, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming to
defend, and could result in costly litigation and payment of
damages. Such claims could harm our reputation, financial
results and competitive position.
15
Risks
Related to Our Corporate Structure, Organization and Common
Stock
The
holdings of our two largest stockholders may enable them to
influence matters requiring stockholder approval.
On March 19, 2004, Warburg Pincus, a global private equity
firm agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of our stock held
by Xerox Corporation for approximately $80 million.
Additionally, on May 9, 2005 and September 15, 2005 we
sold shares of common stock, and warrants to purchase common
stock to Warburg Pincus for aggregate gross proceeds of
approximately $75.1 million. As of September 30, 2006,
Warburg Pincus beneficially owned approximately 23.4% of our
outstanding common stock, including warrants exercisable for up
to 7,066,538 shares of our common stock and
3,562,238 shares of our outstanding Series B Preferred
Stock, each of which is convertible into one share of our common
stock. Franklin Resources, Inc. is our second largest
stockholder, owning approximately 5.3% of our common stock as of
September 30, 2006. Because of their large holdings of our
capital stock relative to other stockholders, each of these two
stockholders acting individually, or together, have a strong
influence over matters requiring approval by our stockholders.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be
subject to wide fluctuations.
Our stock price historically has been and may continue to be
volatile. Various factors contribute to the volatility of our
stock price, including, for example, quarterly variations in our
financial results, new product introductions by us or our
competitors and general economic and market conditions. While we
cannot predict the individual effect that these factors may have
on the market price of our common stock, these factors, either
individually or in the aggregate, could result in significant
volatility in our stock price during any given period of time.
Moreover, companies that have experienced volatility in the
market price of their stock often are subject to securities
class action litigation. If we were the subject of such
litigation, it could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources.
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public
disclosure may result in additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, new regulations promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select
Market, are resulting in increased general and administrative
expenses for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations
in many cases, and as a result, their application in practice
may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory
and governing bodies, which could result in higher costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance
practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of
corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we
intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws,
regulations and standards, and this investment may result in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of
management time and attention from revenue-generating activities
to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new or
changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the
activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, our
business may be harmed.
We
have implemented anti-takeover provisions, which could
discourage or prevent a takeover, even if an acquisition would
be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
Delaware law, as well as other organizational documents could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if
doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
authorized blank check preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of
stockholders;
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at meetings of our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
directors and for stockholder proposals.
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
Our corporate headquarters and administrative, sales, marketing,
research and development and support functions occupy
approximately 105,000 square feet of space that we lease in
Burlington, Massachusetts. We also lease additional properties
in the United States and a number of foreign countries. The
following table summarizes our significant properties as of
September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Sq. Ft.
|
|
|
Lease Term
|
|
Primary Use
|
|
|
(approx.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burlington, Massachusetts
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
May 2015
|
|
Corporate headquarters and
administrative, sales, marketing, research and development and
support functions.
|
Menlo Park, California(1)
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
August 2009
|
|
Sales, marketing and support
functions.
|
Aachen, Germany
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
March 2011
|
|
Research and development.
|
Budapest, Hungary
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
December 2009
|
|
Research and development.
|
Merelbeke, Belgium
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
April 2010
|
|
International headquarters and
research and development.
|
Montreal, Quebec
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
June 2006 to
March 2011
|
|
Sales, marketing, research and
development, customer support and order fulfillment functions.
|
Pacific Shores, Redwood City,
California(2)
|
|
|
141,000
|
|
|
July 2012
|
|
Seventy-five percent of this
facility is unoccupied, the remainder has been sublet to a third
party.
|
Melbourne, Florida(3)
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
Administrative, sales, marketing,
and support functions. Small portion of the facility has been
sublet to a third party.
|
New York, New York(4)
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
February 2016
|
|
Subleased to two separate
third-party tenants.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This is a lease that was assumed as part of our acquisition of
Former Nuance. 10,000 sq ft of the 34,000 is unoccupied. |
|
(2) |
|
The lease for this property was assumed as part of our
acquisition of Former Nuance. See Note 12 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(3) |
|
This building is owned and was acquired during the Dictaphone
acquisition. |
|
(4) |
|
The lease for this property was assumed as part of our
SpeechWorks acquisition. |
In addition to the properties referenced above, we also lease a
number of small sales and marketing offices in the United States
and internationally. As of September 30, 2006, we were
productively utilizing substantially all of the space in our
facilities, except for space identified above as
unoccupied or that has been subleased to third
parties.
17
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Like many companies in the software industry, we have from time
to time been notified of claims that we may be infringing
certain intellectual property rights of others. These claims
have been referred to counsel, and they are in various stages of
evaluation and negotiation. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. There is no assurance that licenses will be offered by
all claimants, that the terms of any offered licenses will be
acceptable to us or that in all cases the dispute will be
resolved without litigation, which may be time consuming and
expensive, and may result in injunctive relief or the payment of
damages by us.
On November 9, 2006, VoiceSignal Technologies, Inc. filed
an action against us and eleven of our resellers in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas claiming
patent infringement. VoiceSignal is seeking damages and
injunctive relief. In the lawsuit, VoiceSignal alleges that we
are infringing United States Patent No. 5,855,000 which is
related to improving correction in a dictation application based
on a two input analysis. We believe the claims have no merit and
intend to defend the action vigorously.
On August 22, 2006, z4 Technologies, Inc. filed an action
against us and five other defendants, including Symantec, Adobe,
Quark, ABBYY and Mathsoft, in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas claiming patent infringement.
Damages were sought in an unspecified amount. In the lawsuit, z4
Technologies alleged that we are infringing United States Patent
Nos. 6,044,471 and 6,785,825 which are directed to a method and
apparatus for reducing unauthorized software use. On
December 4, 2006 we entered into a settlement agreement
with z4 Technologies regarding this action.
On May 31, 2006 GTX Corporation, or GTX, filed an action
against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas claiming patent infringement. Damages were
sought in an unspecified amount. In the lawsuit, GTX alleged
that we are infringing United States Patent No. 7,016,536
entitled Method and Apparatus for Automatic Cleaning and
Enhancing of Scanned Documents. We believe the claims have
no merit and intend to defend the action vigorously.
On November 27, 2002, AllVoice Computing plc, or AllVoice,
filed an action against us in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas claiming patent infringement.
In the lawsuit, AllVoice alleges that the Company is infringing
United States Patent No. 5,799,273 entitled Automated
Proofreading Using Interface Linking Recognized Words to Their
Audio Data While Text Is Being Changed, or the 273 Patent.
The 273 Patent generally discloses techniques for manipulating
audio data associated with text generated by a speech
recognition engine. Although we have several products in the
speech recognition technology field, we believe that our
products do not infringe the 273 Patent because, in addition to
other defenses, they do not use the claimed techniques. Damages
are sought in an unspecified amount. We filed an Answer on
December 23, 2002. On January 4, 2005, the case was
transferred to a new judge of the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas for administrative reasons.
The United States District Court for the Southern District of
Texas entered summary judgment against AllVoice and dismissed
all claims against Nuance on February 21, 2006. AllVoice
filed a notice of appeal from this judgment on April 26,
2006.
In August 2001, the first of a number of complaints was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York, on behalf of a purported class of persons who
purchased Former Nuance stock between April 12, 2000 and
December 6, 2000. Those complaints have been consolidated
into one action. The complaint generally alleges that various
investment bank underwriters engaged in improper and undisclosed
activities related to the allocation of shares in Former
Nuances initial public offering of securities. The
complaint makes claims for violation of several provisions of
the federal securities laws against those underwriters, and also
against Former Nuance and some of the Former Nuances
directors and officers. Similar lawsuits, concerning more than
250 other companies initial public offerings, were filed
in 2001. In February 2003, the Court denied a motion to dismiss
with respect to the claims against Former Nuance. In the third
quarter of 2003, a proposed settlement in principle was reached
among the plaintiffs, issuer defendants (including Former
Nuance) and the issuers insurance carriers. The settlement
calls for the dismissal and release of claims against the issuer
defendants, including Former Nuance, in exchange for a
contingent payment to be paid, if necessary, by the issuer
defendants insurance carriers and an assignment of certain
claims. The timing of the conclusion of the settlement remains
unclear, and the settlement is subject to a number of
conditions, including approval of the Court. The settlement is
not expected to have any material impact upon Former Nuance or
us, as payments, if any, are expected to be made by insurance
18
carriers, rather than by Former Nuance. In July 2004, the
underwriters filed a motion opposing approval by the court of
the settlement among the plaintiffs, issuers and insurers. In
March 2005, the court granted preliminary approval of the
settlement, subject to the parties agreeing to modify the term
of the settlement which limits each underwriter from seeking
contribution against its issuer for damages it may be forced to
pay in the action. On April 24, 2006, the court held a
fairness hearing in connection with the motion for final
approval of the settlement. The court has yet to issue a ruling
on the motion for final approval. On December 5, 2006, the
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the
Courts order certifying a class in several test
cases that had been selected by the underwriter defendants
and plaintiffs in the coordinated proceeding. The settlement
remains subject to a number of conditions, including final court
approval. In the event the settlement is not concluded, we
intend to defend the litigation vigorously. We believe we have
meritorious defenses to the claims against Former Nuance.
We believe that the final outcome of the current litigation
matters described above will not have a significant adverse
effect on our financial position or results of operations.
However, even if our defense is successful, the litigation could
require significant management time and will be costly. Should
we not prevail in these litigation matters, our operating
results, financial position and cash flows could be adversely
impacted.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders in the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol NUAN. The table below shows the
high and low sale prices of our common stock for each quarter of
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
7.89
|
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
12.04
|
|
|
|
7.41
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
7.37
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
|
Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
4.51
|
|
|
$
|
3.25
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
4.80
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
5.38
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
Holders
As of November 30, 2006, there were 923 stockholders of
record of our common stock.
Dividend
Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock. We currently expect to retain future earnings, if any, to
finance the growth and development of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
The terms of our credit facility place restrictions on our
ability to pay dividends except for stock dividends (see
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results
19
of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources
and Note 10 Debt in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements).
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
We have not announced any currently effective authorization to
repurchase shares of our common stock. However, upon vesting of
restricted stock awards, employees are permitted to return to us
a portion of the newly vested shares to satisfy the tax
withholding obligations that arise in connection with such
vesting. The following table summarizes repurchases of our
common stock during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, which
represent shares returned to satisfy tax withholding obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Value of Shares that
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
May Yet be
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
July 2, 2006
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2006
August 31, 2006
|
|
|
43,687
|
|
|
$
|
7.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2006
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
43,687
|
|
|
$
|
7.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Data
|
On October 23, 2004, our Board of Directors approved a
change in the Companys fiscal year end from
December 31 to September 30, effective beginning
September 30, 2004. All references in this Form
10-K to the
fiscal 2004 refer to the nine month period ended
September 30, 2004. References to fiscal 2005 and 2006,
refer to the twelve month periods ended September 30.
References to fiscal 2003 and prior years, refer to the twelve
month periods ended December 31.
The following selected consolidated financial data is not
necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The interim statement of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 is unaudited and, in the opinion of
management, reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments,
20
necessary for a fair statement of results of operations for the
nine months ended September 30, 2003. (Amounts in
thousands, except per share dollars and percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006(1),(2)
|
|
|
2005(4),(5)
|
|
|
2004(6)
|
|
|
2003(7)
|
|
|
2003(7)
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
388,510
|
|
|
$
|
232,388
|
|
|
$
|
130,907
|
|
|
$
|
88,529
|
|
|
$
|
135,399
|
|
|
$
|
106,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
267,467
|
|
|
|
163,185
|
|
|
|
89,113
|
|
|
|
65,405
|
|
|
|
98,760
|
|
|
|
80,730
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
8,370
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
(7,993
|
)
|
|
|
(7,033
|
)
|
|
|
(6,462
|
)
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(7,071
|
)
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
(8,045
|
)
|
|
|
(6,375
|
)
|
|
|
(5,787
|
)
|
|
|
6,587
|
|
Provision for (benefit from)
income taxes
|
|
|
15,144
|
|
|
|
6,812
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
254
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(22,215
|
)
|
|
|
(5,417
|
)
|
|
|
(9,378
|
)
|
|
|
(6,848
|
)
|
|
|
(5,518
|
)
|
|
|
6,333
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change(2)
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(22,887
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,417
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,378
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,848
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,518
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per
Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
163,873
|
|
|
|
109,540
|
|
|
|
103,780
|
|
|
|
71,286
|
|
|
|
78,398
|
|
|
|
67,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
163,873
|
|
|
|
109,540
|
|
|
|
103,780
|
|
|
|
71,286
|
|
|
|
78,398
|
|
|
|
72,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short
and long-term marketable securities
|
|
$
|
112,334
|
|
|
$
|
95,814
|
|
|
$
|
47,691
|
|
|
$
|
48,038
|
|
|
$
|
42,584
|
|
|
$
|
18,853
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,235,074
|
|
|
|
757,212
|
|
|
|
392,653
|
|
|
|
376,341
|
|
|
|
401,940
|
|
|
|
143,690
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current
portion(3)
|
|
|
349,990
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
27,700
|
|
|
|
28,085
|
|
|
|
27,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
576,596
|
|
|
|
514,665
|
|
|
|
301,745
|
|
|
|
288,512
|
|
|
|
303,226
|
|
|
|
119,378
|
|
Selected Data and
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
51,273
|
|
|
|
12,130
|
|
|
|
27,940
|
|
|
|
36,375
|
|
|
|
44,305
|
|
|
|
16,842
|
|
Depreciation of property and
equipment
|
|
|
8,366
|
|
|
|
5,019
|
|
|
|
2,919
|
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
|
30,083
|
|
|
|
13,134
|
|
|
|
10,399
|
|
|
|
8,927
|
|
|
|
12,813
|
|
|
|
11,152
|
|
Gross margin percentage
|
|
|
68.8
|
%
|
|
|
70.2
|
%
|
|
|
68.1
|
%
|
|
|
73.9
|
%
|
|
|
72.9
|
%
|
|
|
75.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On March 31, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding
shares of Dictaphone Corporation. See Note 3 of the Notes
to our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
21
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Nuance adopted the provision of SFAS 123(R),
Share-Based Payment effective October 1, 2005,
the beginning of fiscal 2006. As a result, the results of
operations included incremental share-based payments over what
would have been recorded had the company continued to account
for share-based compensation under APB No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. See
Note 16 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
|
(3) |
|
During fiscal 2006, we entered into a new senior secured credit
facility which consists of a $355.0 million
7-year term
loan and a $75.0 million six-year revolving credit line to
partially finance our acquisition of Dictaphone. As of
September 30, 2006, there were no outstanding borrowings
under the revolving credit line. See Note 10 of the Notes
to our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(4) |
|
During fiscal 2005, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of
Rhetorical Systems, Ltd., ART Advanced Recognition Technologies,
Inc., Phonetic Systems Ltd., MedRemote, Inc. and Nuance
Communications, Inc. (Former Nuance) See Note 3 of the
Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(5) |
|
Income from operations for the year ended September 30,
2005 reflects $7.2 million in restructuring charges,
consisting of $2.9 million related to the elimination of
personnel and $4.3 million related to the abandoned leased
facilities, including the write-off of leasehold improvements.
See Note 13 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
|
(6) |
|
During fiscal 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of
Telelogue, Inc. and Brand & Groeber Communications GbR.
See Note 3 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
|
(7) |
|
During fiscal 2003, we acquired Royal Philips Electronic Speech
Processing Telephony and Voice control business units, and
related intellectual property. We also acquired all of the
outstanding shares of SpeechWorks International, Inc. and
LocusDialog, Inc. |
Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis, or
MD&A, is intended to help the reader understand the results
of operations and financial condition of our business. MD&A
is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in
conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Forward-looking
Statements
This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include predictions regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
our future revenue, cost of revenue, research and development
expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses,
amortization of other intangible assets and gross margin;
|
|
|
|
our strategy relating to speech and imaging technologies;
|
|
|
|
the potential of future product releases;
|
|
|
|
our product development plans and investments in research and
development;
|
|
|
|
future acquisitions, and anticipated benefits from prior
acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
international operations and localized versions of our
products; and
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings and litigation matters.
|
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by
the use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks described in Item 1A Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
22
Overview
of the Business
We are a leading provider of speech and imaging solutions for
businesses and consumers around the world. Our technologies,
applications and services are transforming the way people
create, use and interact with information and make the
experience of our end users a more compelling, convenient and
satisfying one.
Our speech technologies enable voice-activated services over a
telephone, transform speech into written word, and permit the
control of devices and applications by simply speaking. With the
acquisition of Dictaphone, we expanded our speech technologies
in the automatic conversion of voice reports into electronic
patient reports for a wide range of users in the transcription
and healthcare industry. We expect our acquisition of Dictaphone
to significantly expand our reach into the healthcare industry.
Our imaging solutions offer cost-effective PDF applications for
business users, convert paper and PDF into documents that can be
easily edited, and simplify scanning and document management
using multifunction scanners and networked digital copiers.
Our software can be delivered as part of a larger integrated
system, such as systems for customer service call centers, or as
an independent application, such as dictation, medical
transcription, document or PDF conversion, navigation systems in
automobiles or digital copiers on a network. In select
situations we sell or license intellectual property in
conjunction with or in place of embedding our intellectual
property in software. Our products and technologies deliver a
measurable return on investment to our customers and our goal is
to help our customers optimize productivity and reduce costs.
We market and distribute our products indirectly through a
global network of resellers comprising system integrators,
independent software vendors, value-added resellers, hardware
vendors, telecommunications carriers and distributors; and
directly to businesses and consumers through a dedicated direct
sales force and our
e-commerce
website (www.nuance.com).
Nuance was incorporated in 1992 as Visioneer, Inc. under the
laws of the state of Delaware. In 1999, we changed our name to
ScanSoft, Inc. and also changed our ticker symbol to SSFT. In
October 2004, we changed our fiscal year end to
September 30, resulting in a nine-month fiscal year for
2004. In October 2005, we changed our name to Nuance
Communications, Inc., to reflect our core mission of being the
worlds most comprehensive and innovative provider of
speech solutions, and in November 2005 we changed our ticker
symbol to NUAN.
Our business is predicated on providing our partners and
customers with a comprehensive portfolio of
value-added
solutions, ensuring technological leadership, promoting the
broad adoption of our innovative technology and building global
sales and channel relationships. We continue to execute our
strategy of maintaining leadership in speech and imaging through
sustained growth in our ongoing operations as well as through
strategic acquisitions that complement our existing capabilities.
Our focus on providing competitive and value-added solutions for
our customers and partners requires a broad set of technologies,
service offerings and channel capabilities. We have successfully
completed and integrated 15 acquisitions since 2000 and we
expect to continue to make acquisitions of other companies,
businesses and technologies to complement our internal
investments. We have a team that focuses on evaluating market
needs and potential acquisitions to fulfill them. In addition,
we have a disciplined methodology for integrating acquired
companies and businesses after the transaction is complete. In
recent fiscal years, we completed a number of acquisitions,
including the following significant transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
On January 30, 2003, we acquired Royal Philips Electronics
Speech Processing Telephony and Voice Control business units to
expand our solutions for speech in call centers and within
automobiles and mobile devices.
|
|
|
|
On August 11, 2003, we acquired SpeechWorks International,
Inc. to broaden our speech applications for telecommunications,
call centers and embedded environments as well as establish a
professional services organization.
|
|
|
|
On February 1, 2005, we acquired Phonetic Systems Ltd. to
complement our solutions and expertise in automated directory
assistance and enterprise speech applications.
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
On September 15, 2005, we acquired the former Nuance
Communications, Inc., which we refer to as Former Nuance, to
expand our portfolio of technologies, applications and services
for call center automation, customer self service and directory
assistance.
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2006, we acquired Dictaphone Corporation, a
leading healthcare information technology company that provides
a broad range of digital dictation, transcription, and report
management system solutions.
|
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents, as a percentage of total revenue,
certain selected financial data for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the nine months ended
September 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
60.7
|
%
|
|
|
73.7
|
%
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
Professional services,
subscription and hosting
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Cost of professional services,
subscription and hosting
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Cost of revenue from amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
68.8
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
|
|
68.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
(credits), net
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
69.4
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
REVENUE
The following table shows total revenue by geographic location,
based on the location of our customers, in absolute dollars and
percentage change (in thousands, except percentages):
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
288,300
|
|
|
$
|
160,927
|
|
|
$
|
91,472
|
|
|
|
79.1
|
%
|
|
|
75.9
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
100,210
|
|
|
|
71,461
|
|
|
|
39,435
|
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
81.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
388,510
|
|
|
$
|
232,388
|
|
|
$
|
130,907
|
|
|
|
67.2
|
%
|
|
|
77.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Total revenue for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006
increased by $156.1 million as compared to the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2005. The increase was primarily due to
$112.4 million of revenue related to our acquisitions of
Former Nuance and Dictaphone. Organic total revenue increased
$43.7 million, or 19%, in fiscal 2006. Included in this
organic growth, network revenue increased 20%, dictation revenue
increased 26% primarily as a result of the release of Dragon
NaturallySpeaking version 9.0, while embedded revenue increased
by 37% and imaging revenue increased by 6%.
Based on the location of the customers, the geographic split in
fiscal 2006 was 74% of total revenue in the United States and
26% internationally. This compares to 69% of total revenue in
the United States and 31% internationally for the year ended
September 30, 2005. The increase in revenue generated in
the United States was primarily due to sales of Dictaphone
products, 93.0% of which revenue is derived in in the United
States. Excluding the Dictaphone revenue for fiscal 2006, 68% of
total revenue was derived from customers in the United States
and 32% internationally.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Total revenue for fiscal 2005 increased by $101.5 million
as compared to fiscal 2004. The increase in revenue was due to
several factors, including a twelve-month fiscal period in 2005,
which included a seasonally strong fourth calendar quarter that
contributed $60.6 million of total revenue. Excluding that
incremental quarter, total revenue increased $40.9 million,
or 31.2%. The substantial majority of the growth derived from
comparative periods due to organic growth in product lines
existing as of January 1, 2004 and to a lesser extent based
on revenue related to acquisitions consummated in late fiscal
2004 and during fiscal 2005.
The geographic revenue split, based on the location of our
customers, was 69% of total revenue in fiscal 2005 in the United
States and 31% internationally. This compares to 70% of total
revenue in the United States and 30% internationally for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2004.
Product
and Licensing Revenue
Product and licensing revenue primarily consists of sales and
licenses of our speech and imaging products and technology. The
following table shows product and licensing revenue in absolute
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (in thousands,
except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
235,825
|
|
|
$
|
171,200
|
|
|
$
|
98,262
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
|
|
74.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
60.7
|
%
|
|
|
73.7
|
%
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2006 increased by
$64.6 million compared to fiscal 2005. This increase in
product and licensing revenue was primarily due to
$39.8 million of revenue attributable to our acquisitions
of Former Nuance and Dictaphone. Excluding the impact of these
acquisitions, product and licensing revenue grew
$24.8 million, or 15%, compared to the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2005. Due to a change in revenue mix, driven
primarily by the growth of maintenance and support revenue,
product and licensing revenue as a percentage of total revenue
declined 13% in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005.
Speech related product and licensing revenue increased 56% in
fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2007, growing to 70% of total
product and licensing revenue in fiscal 2006, up from 60% in
fiscal 2005. Excluding revenue due to our acquisitions of Former
Nuance and Dictaphone, speech related product and licensing
revenue increased by $19.6 million, or 19%, in fiscal 2006
compared to fiscal 2005. The growth in speech revenue resulted
from increased sales of our legacy network products, embedded
products in automotive and handsets, as well as increased sales
in dictation fueled by our fourth quarter release of Dragon
NaturallySpeaking 9.0. Product and licensing revenue from our
imaging products increased by $5.2 million, or 8%, due to
increased sales of our PDF product family with the September
2006 release of PDF 4.0 and the May 2006 release of PaperPort 11.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2005 increased by
$72.9 million compared to fiscal 2004. The increase in
product and licensing revenue is generally attributable to the
factors discussed above with respect to total revenue, including
the seasonably strong fourth calendar quarter of calendar 2004
that contributed $46.8 million of increased product and
licensing revenue. Excluding the revenue from the additional
three-month period, product and licensing revenue increased
$26.1 million, or 26.6%. The substantial majority of the
growth in addition to the additional three months was growth
from organic products that we had in our product portfolio as of
January 1, 2004, and to a lesser extent was based on
revenue related to recent acquisitions. Speech related product
and licensing revenue increased to 60% of total product and
licensing revenue for fiscal 2005, up from 55% of total product
and licensing revenue in fiscal 2004. Expressed in dollars,
revenue from speech related products totaled $104.2 million
for fiscal 2005, as compared to $54.6 million for fiscal
2004. Within speech, network revenue remained relatively stable
at 25% of total product and licensing revenue in fiscal 2005,
while embedded revenue increased to 10% of total product and
licensing revenue in fiscal 2005, up from 7% in fiscal 2004. The
increase in embedded revenue was largely attributable to the
acquisition of ART in January 2005. Dictation revenue in fiscal
2005 increased to 25% of total product and licensing revenue, up
from 22% for fiscal 2004, primarily due to the release of Dragon
NaturallySpeaking 8.0 in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, as
well as the May 2005 acquisition of MedRemote.
Imaging related product and licensing revenue increased to
$66.9 million for fiscal 2005, up 53% from fiscal 2004. Of
this increase, 33% is due to the additional three months
included in fiscal 2005, with the majority of the remaining
increase attributable to increased sales of our PaperPort
product family, which had a new release in the first quarter of
fiscal 2005.
Professional
Services, Subscription and Hosting Revenue
Professional services revenue primarily consists of consulting,
implementation and training services for speech customers.
Subscription and hosting revenue primarily relates to delivering
hosted and
on-site
directory assistance and transcription and dictation services
over a specified term. The following table shows professional
26
services, subscription and hosting revenue in absolute dollars
and as a percentage of total revenue (in thousands, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Professional services,
subscription and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
81,320
|
|
|
$
|
47,308
|
|
|
$
|
25,358
|
|
|
|
71.9
|
%
|
|
|
86.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Professional services, subscription and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2006 increased by $34.0 million as compared to
fiscal 2005. The largest component of this increase in
professional services revenue was $22.0 million of revenue
due to our acquisitions of Former Nuance and Dictaphone.
Included in the Dictaphone revenue is $16.0 million of
revenue relating to the subscription and hosting customer base.
Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, our professional
services revenue increased by $12.0 million, or 26%
compared to fiscal 2005, with most product lines contributing to
this growth. Network services, excluding revenue attributable to
Former Nuance, provided $9.0 million, or 26% organic
growth, based on growth in core network consulting, subscription
and hosting and training revenue.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Professional services, subscription and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2005 increased by $22.0 million as compared to
fiscal 2004. The increase in professional services revenue was
partially attributed to the inclusion of the seasonably strong
fourth calendar quarter of calendar 2004 that contributed
$11.0 million of increased professional services revenue.
In addition to the revenue from that extra three-month period,
professional services revenue increased $11.0 million, or
43%. The substantial majority of the growth was derived from
organic growth in products existing as of January 1, 2004
and a lesser portion was attributable to acquisitions made in
fiscal 2005. The organic growth is primarily due to the
continued demand for consulting services, both in project size
and in the volume of projects. Also contributing to the total
growth, but to a lesser extent, was revenue from subscription
based licensing and hosting services.
Maintenance
and Support Revenue
Maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of technical
support and maintenance service for our speech products
including network, embedded and dictation and transcription
products. The following table shows maintenance and support
revenue in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue
(in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
71,365
|
|
|
$
|
13,880
|
|
|
$
|
7,287
|
|
|
|
414.2
|
%
|
|
|
90.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Maintenance and support revenue increased by $57.5 million
in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. As a percentage of total
revenue, maintenance and support revenue grew 12.4% in fiscal
2006, up from 6% in fiscal 2005. $50.5 million of this
increase is due to our acquisitions of Former Nuance and
Dictaphone, both of which have a significant customer base of
maintenance and support contracts from historic sales of
product. Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, maintenance
and support revenue increased $7.0 million, or 50%, in
fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005, due to our continued strong
renewal rates as well as from new sales in our network products.
27
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Maintenance and support revenue for fiscal 2005 increased by
$6.6 million compared to fiscal 2004. $2.8 million of
this increase is attributable to the additional three months
included in fiscal 2005. Excluding that incremental quarter,
maintenance and support revenue increased $3.3 million, or
45%. The substantial majority of the growth derived from
comparative periods was the result of organic growth in product
lines existing as of January 1, 2004, and to a lesser
extent the acquisitions consummated in late fiscal 2004 and
during fiscal 2005.
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
In fiscal 2006, stock-based compensation includes the
amortization of the fair value of share-based payments made to
employees and to members of our Board of Directors, under the
provisions of SFAS 123R, which we adopted on
October 1, 2005 (see Note 2, Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K).
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R, we have recorded
$22.5 million of expense related to share-based payments
during fiscal 2006 as compared to $3.0 million in fiscal
2005 and $1.5 million in fiscal 2004. To isolate the
effects of the accounting change and to facilitate comparative
review of our operations between the fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005
and fiscal 2004 periods, we have presented below each cost and
expense line in tabular format, with and without the amounts
recorded in each period relating to share-based payments. Unless
noted otherwise, discussion of fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal
2005 represents discussion of costs and expenses excluding
share-based payments.
Cost of
Product and Licensing Revenue
Cost of product and licensing revenue primarily consists of
material and fulfillment costs, manufacturing and operations
costs, and third-party royalty expenses. The following table
shows cost of product and licensing revenue including and
excluding the cost of product and licensing revenue attributable
to stock-based compensation, in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of product and licensing revenue (in thousands,
except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
revenue
|
|
$
|
31,394
|
|
|
$
|
20,378
|
|
|
$
|
10,348
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
%
|
|
|
96.9
|
%
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
revenue, excluding share-based payments
|
|
$
|
31,306
|
|
|
$
|
20,368
|
|
|
$
|
10,348
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
%
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of product and
licensing revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including share-based payments
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding share-based payments
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Cost of product and licensing revenue, excluding share-based
payments, for fiscal 2006 increased $10.9 million as
compared to fiscal 2005 primarily due to $9.3 million of
costs due to our acquisitions of Former Nuance and Dictaphone.
As a percentage of product and licensing revenue, cost of
product and licensing revenue increased 1.4% in fiscal 2006,
largely due to Dictaphone products that have higher cost of
goods sold relative to our other products. The added costs of
goods sold for Dictaphone products are primarily due to third
party hardware that is included in the solutions licensed to
customers.
Excluding Dictaphone, in fiscal 2006 the cost of product and
licensing revenue increased by $1.9 million, while
declining to 9.2% of product and licensing revenue. The decrease
as a percent of revenue was due to several factors. Most
notably, the materials costs decreased by 0.7%, to 3.9% of
product and licensing revenue, due to a decrease in imaging
boxed products relative to speech products which carry lower
materials costs. Additionally,
28
royalties decreased by $0.5 million compared to fiscal 2005
driven largely by contractual changes for our embedded product
lines royalties.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Cost of product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2005 grew
$10.0 million compared to fiscal 2004. This 96.9% increase
is due to a number of factors, most significant of which is the
additional three months included in 2005 as compared to 2004.
Additionally, the expenses have increased along with the 75.2%
growth in product and licensing revenue as compared to fiscal
2004. As a percentage of product and licensing revenue, cost of
product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2005 increased to 11.9%
as compared to 10.6% in fiscal 2004. This increase is primarily
due to higher third party royalty expense that amounted to
$4.2 million for fiscal 2005, compared to $1.2 million
in fiscal 2004. The $3.0 million increase is due to a
number of factors including more products that have royalties
associated with them, higher royalties associated with
renegotiated contracts with third parties for certain imaging
products, and the 75.2% increase in product and licensing
revenue. Partially offsetting the royalty increase was a modest
decrease in material costs of product and licensing revenue,
from 5.0% of product and licensing revenue in fiscal 2004 to
4.6% for fiscal 2005.
Cost of
Professional Services, Subscription and Hosting
Revenue
Cost of professional services, subscription and hosting revenue
primarily consists of compensation for consulting personnel,
outside consultants and overhead, as well as the hardware and
communications fees that support our subscription and hosted
solutions. The following table shows cost of revenue including
and excluding the cost of revenue attributable to stock-based
compensation, in absolute dollars and as a percentage of
professional services, subscription and hosting revenue (in
thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cost of professional services,
subscription and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
59,015
|
|
|
$
|
34,737
|
|
|
$
|
20,456
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
%
|
|
|
69.8
|
%
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of professional services,
subscription and hosting revenue, excluding share-based payments
|
|
$
|
57,142
|
|
|
$
|
34,630
|
|
|
$
|
20,397
|
|
|
|
65.0
|
%
|
|
|
69.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of professional
services, subscription and hosting revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including share-based payments
|
|
|
72.6
|
%
|
|
|
73.4
|
%
|
|
|
80.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding share-based payments
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
73.2
|
%
|
|
|
80.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Cost of professional services, subscription and hosting revenue,
excluding share-based payments, increased $22.5 million in
fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 primarily due to
$14.9 million of costs due to our acquisitions of Former
Nuance and Dictaphone, both of which have robust professional
services organizations to support revenue streams. Additionally,
Dictaphone has a large subscription-based licensing and hosted
application customer base. The 65.0% growth in costs supports
the 71.9% growth in related revenue for fiscal 2006. Cost of
professional services as a percentage of the revenue, excluding
share-based payments, improved 2.9% as synergies were realized
from the merging of the service teams from Former Nuance and
Dictaphone. These improvements were offset partially by
increased expenses for the subscription and hosting services.
29
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Cost of professional services, subscription and hosting revenue
for fiscal 2005 increased $14.2 million compared to fiscal
2004. This increase was due to a number of factors including the
additional three months included in fiscal 2005. Additionally,
incremental costs were necessary to support the 86.6% growth in
related revenue. As a percentage of the related revenue, cost of
professional services, subscription and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2005 decreased to 73.2% compared to 80.4% in fiscal 2004.
The percentage decrease in professional services cost as a
percent of professional services revenue is attributable to a
number of factors, including a reduction in outside consultant
expenses and a more efficient utilization of existing headcount.
Cost of
Maintenance and Support Revenue
Cost of maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of
compensation for product support personnel and overhead. The
following table shows cost of maintenance and support revenue
including and excluding the cost of maintenance and support
revenue attributable to stock-based compensation, in absolute
dollars and as a percentage of maintenance and support revenue
(in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
revenue
|
|
$
|
17,723
|
|
|
$
|
4,938
|
|
|
$
|
2,559
|
|
|
|
258.9
|
%
|
|
|
93.0
|
%
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
revenue, excluding share-based payments
|
|
$
|
17,198
|
|
|
$
|
4,923
|
|
|
$
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
249.3
|
%
|
|
|
92.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of maintenance and
support revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including share-based payments
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
|
35.6
|
%
|
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding share-based payments
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Cost of maintenance and support revenue, excluding share-based
payments, for fiscal 2006 increased $12.3 million compared
to fiscal 2005 due primarily to $8.0 million of costs for
the additional headcount to support the additional revenue from
our acquisitions of Former Nuance and Dictaphone. As a
percentage of maintenance and support revenue, cost of revenue
decreased 11.4% in fiscal 2006 to 24.1%. This decrease in
percentage is primarily attributable to lower costs relative to
the revenue in our healthcare maintenance and support business
following our acquisition of Dictaphone. Speech margins,
excluding the acquisition of Dictaphone, also improved in fiscal
2006, primarily due to synergies we realized upon the
combination of pre-existing and acquired product lines following
our acquisition of Former Nuance.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Cost of maintenance and support revenue for fiscal 2005 grew
$2.4 million as compared to fiscal 2004. This increase was
due to a number of factors including the additional three months
included in fiscal 2005. Additionally, incremental costs were
necessary to support the 79.6% growth in related revenue. As a
percentage of maintenance revenue, cost of maintenance revenue
increased 2.5% in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. The
percentage increase was attributable to increased staffing made
in advance of the anticipation of increasing revenue.
Cost of
Revenue from Amortization of Intangible Assets
Cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets consists
of the amortization of acquired patents and core and completed
technology using the straight-line basis over their estimated
useful lives. We evaluate the recoverability of intangible
assets periodically or whenever events or changes in business
circumstances indicate that the carry value of our intangible
assets may not be recoverable. The following table shows cost of
revenue from
30
amortization of intangible assets in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of total revenue (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cost of revenue from amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
$
|
12,911
|
|
|
$
|
9,150
|
|
|
$
|
8,431
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets increased
$3.8 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. The
increase was primarily attributable to the $4.4 million in
amortization of intangible assets acquired in connection with
our acquisitions of Dictaphone in March 2006 and Former Nuance
in September 2005. Additionally, the increase was due to
$0.4 million in expense relative to amortization of the
license that resulted from our December 4, 2006 settlement
and licensing of technology from z4 Technologies, Inc. (refer to
Note 23 of Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements
for discussion of this subsequent event). In addition, during
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that we would
not make additional investments to support a technology licensed
from a non-related third-party in 2003. As a result, we revised
the cash flow estimates related to the purchased technology and
recorded an additional $2.6 million in cost of revenue to
write down the purchased technology to its net realizable value.
These increases were offset in part by the cessation of the
amortization of technology and patents that was established in
connection with our acquisitions consummated in 1999 and 2000.
Based on the amortizable intangible assets as of
September 30, 2006, and assuming no impairment or reduction
in expected lives, we expect cost of revenue from amortization
of intangible assets for fiscal 2007 to be $11.2 million.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets increased
$0.7 million in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. The
increase was attributable to the additional three months
included in the fiscal 2005 period, partially offset by the net
amount of amortization of intangible assets that became fully
amortized in fiscal 2004 and new amortization on assets
established in connection with our acquisitions during fiscal
2004 and 2005.
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries
and benefits and overhead relating to our engineering staff. The
following table shows research and development expense including
and excluding the research and development expense attributable
to share-based payments, in absolute dollars and as a percentage
of total revenue (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Total research and development
expense
|
|
$
|
59,403
|
|
|
$
|
39,190
|
|
|
$
|
26,390
|
|
|
|
51.6
|
%
|
|
|
48.5
|
%
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
4,578
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense,
excluding share-based payments
|
|
$
|
54,825
|
|
|
$
|
38,949
|
|
|
$
|
26,162
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
|
48.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including share-based payments
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding share-based payments
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Research and development expense, excluding share-based
payments, increased $15.9 million in fiscal 2006 compared
to fiscal 2005 primarily due to a $12.9 million increase in
compensation related expense associated with increased average
headcount of 80 employees mainly resulting from our acquisitions
of Former Nuance and Dictaphone. The remaining increase was
attributable to an increase in other headcount related expenses,
including travel and infrastructure related expenses as we
continued to invest in our products. While continuing to
increase in absolute dollars, research and development expense
has decreased relative to our total revenue. This decrease in
expense as a percentage of total revenue reflects synergies
following previous acquisitions.
We believe that the development of new products and the
enhancement of existing products are essential to our success.
Accordingly, we plan to continue to invest in research and
development activities. To date, we have not capitalized any
internal development costs as the cost incurred after
technological feasibility but before release of products has not
been significant. While we will continue to invest in research
and development in fiscal 2007, we expect research and
development expenses to decline as a percentage of revenue.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Research and development expense, excluding share-based
payments, increased $12.8 million in fiscal 2005 as
compared to fiscal 2004. The increase in expenses after
reflecting the effect of the three months ended December 2004 in
fiscal 2004, results in additional expenses of
$3.9 million, or 11% in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal
2004 on an annualized basis. While increasing in absolute
dollars, research and development expense decreased relative to
our total revenue. This decrease in expense as a percentage of
total revenue reflects synergies following previous acquisitions.
Sales and
Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and benefits,
commissions, advertising, direct mail, public relations,
tradeshows and other costs of marketing programs, travel
expenses associated with our sales organization and overhead.
The following table shows sales and marketing expense including
and excluding the sales and marketing expense attributable to
share-based payments, in absolute dollars and as a percentage of
total revenue (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Total sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
128,412
|
|
|
$
|
78,797
|
|
|
$
|
49,554
|
|
|
|
63.0
|
%
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
7,332
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expense,
excluding share-based payments
|
|
$
|
121,080
|
|
|
$
|
77,925
|
|
|
$
|
49,134
|
|
|
|
55.4
|
%
|
|
|
58.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including share-based payments
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
|
33.9
|
%
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding share-based payments
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Sales and marketing expense, excluding share-based payments,
increased $43.2 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to
fiscal 2005. $34.7 million of this increase was
attributable to an increase in salaries and other variable
costs, commissions and travel expenses relating to an increase
in average headcount of 207 employees primarily resulting from
our acquisitions of Former Nuance and Dictaphone and continued
investment in the sales force for our existing products. In
addition, our marketing expenses increased $7.8 million
primarily to support new product releases made during 2006,
including PaperPort 11 and Dragon Naturally Speaking 9.0, as
well as additional marketing expenses of Dictaphone and Former
Nuance products. While the expense in absolute dollars
increased,
32
sales and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue decreased
as we achieved higher sales volumes while controlling our cost
structure.
We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase as we
continue to pursue our strategic goals. While increasing in
absolute dollars, we expect to see a decrease in sales and
marketing expenses as a percentage of revenue in fiscal 2007 as
the expected revenue growth outpaces the expenses in this area.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Sales and marketing expense, excluding share-based payments,
increased $28.8 million in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal
2004. The increase in expenses after reflecting the effect of
the three months ended December 2004, resulted in additional
expenses of $10.2 million, or 15% in fiscal 2005 compared
to fiscal 2004 on an annualized basis. While increasing in
absolute dollars, sales and marketing expense as a percent of
total revenue dropped 4.0% in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal
2004. Decreases in expenses as a percent of revenue were derived
largely from an improved efficiency of the sales organization,
allowing for total compensation of sales and marketing employees
to decrease as a percentage of revenue, to 18.9% of total
revenue for fiscal 2005, down from 21.1% for fiscal 2004.
Additionally, while the cost of marketing programs increased in
absolute dollars to $16.9 million for fiscal 2005 from
$10.7 million for fiscal 2004, this represents a decrease
in terms of the percentage compared to total revenue of 0.9%,
from 8.2% in fiscal 2004 to 7.3% in fiscal 2005.
General
and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses primarily consist of
personnel costs, (including overhead), for administration,
finance, human resources, information systems, facilities and
general management, fees for external professional advisors
including accountants and attorneys, insurance, and provisions
for doubtful accounts. The following table shows general and
administrative expense including and excluding the general and
administrative expense attributable to share-based payments, in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (in
thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Total general and administrative
expense
|
|
$
|
55,343
|
|
|
$
|
31,959
|
|
|
$
|
18,394
|
|
|
|
73.2
|
%
|
|
|
73.7
|
%
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
7,471
|
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
expense, excluding share-based payments
|
|
$
|
47,872
|
|
|
$
|
30,208
|
|
|
$
|
17,807
|
|
|
|
58.5
|
%
|
|
|
69.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including share-based payments
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding share-based payments
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
General and administrative expense, excluding share-based
payments, increased $17.7 million in fiscal 2006 compared
to fiscal 2005. The acquisition of Dictaphone contributed
$7.7 million of this increase, including $3.0 million
paid to Dictaphone staff for non-recurring activities necessary
to transition knowledge and processes post-acquisition and
$0.8 million in non-recurring activities performed by
certain advisors who supported planning and integration efforts
for this acquisition. General and administrative expenses,
excluding those related to Dictaphone, increased
$10.0 million due primarily to compensation for increased
employees and external contractors in the finance, human
resources, legal and other general and administrative functions.
This increase in spending on staff and contractors was related
to the integration of the acquisitions we made in fiscal 2005,
as well as to compliance with new regulations, such as the
implementation of SFAS 123R in fiscal 2006. These new
initiatives were partially offset by a reduction in overall
costs for staffing and contractors needed to comply with the
provisions of Sarbanes Oxley in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal
2005. While the expense increased in absolute
33
dollars, general and administrative expense as a percentage of
revenue decreased as we achieved higher sales volumes while
controlling our cost structure.
We expect to continue to see general and administrative expenses
as a percentage of total revenue decrease as revenue growth
outpaces expense growth. Notwithstanding the decrease as a
percentage of total revenue, we expect to increase the total
amount expended relating to general and administrative expenses
as we support the growth of our business.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
General and administrative expense, excluding share-based
payments, increased $13.6 million in fiscal 2005 compared
to fiscal 2004. The increase in expenses after reflecting the
effect of the three months ended December 2004 in fiscal 2004,
results in additional expenses of $6.3 million, or 24.7% in
fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 on an annualized basis.
The increase in fiscal 2005 was primarily the result of costs
relating to incremental headcount and fees for professional
consultants. The costs relating to headcount were mainly
attributable to additional team members in the finance,
facilities and IT departments. The increase in expenditures for
professional consultants includes fees for Sarbanes Oxley
compliance, accounting and legal advisors, and advisors
supporting our planning and integration efforts related to our
acquisition of Former Nuance.
Amortization
of Other Intangible Assets
Amortization of other intangible assets into operating expense
includes amortization of acquired customer and contractual
relationships, non-competition agreements and acquired trade
names and trademarks. Customer relationships are amortized on an
accelerated basis based upon the pattern in which the economic
benefit of customer relationships are being utilized. Other
identifiable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives. We evaluate these
assets for impairment and for appropriateness of their remaining
life on an ongoing basis. The following table shows amortization
of other intangible assets in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of total revenue (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
$
|
17,172
|
|
|
$
|
3,984
|
|
|
$
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
331.0
|
%
|
|
|
102.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Amortization of intangible assets increased $13.2 million
in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 largely attributable
to the $10.8 million of amortization of identifiable
intangible assets related to our acquisition of Dictaphone and
full year amortization relating to our acquisitions of Former
Nuance, Rhetorical, ART, Phonetic and MedRemote acquisitions.
Based on the amortizable intangible assets as of
September 30, 2006, and assuming no impairment or reduction
in expected lives, we expect that the fiscal 2007 amortization
included in operating expenses will be $20.4 million.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Operating expenses derived from the amortization of intangible
assets increased $2.0 million in fiscal 2005 as compared to
fiscal 2004. The increase relates to the additional three months
included in fiscal 2005, and to the amortization of intangible
assets that were purchased in connection with our acquisitions
during fiscal 2004 and 2005.
34
Restructuring
and Other Charges (Credits), Net
During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we recorded a
$1.3 million reduction to existing restructuring reserves
as a result of the execution of a favorable sublease agreement
relating to one of the facilities included in our 2005
restructuring plan. The amount was partially offset by other net
adjustments of $0.1 million associated with prior
years restructuring programs.
In fiscal 2005, we incurred restructuring charges of
$7.2 million. The charges were related to the elimination
of ten employees during the first quarter of 2006, a plan of
restructuring relative to certain of our facilities in June
2005, and a September 2005 plan of restructuring to eliminate
additional facilities and a reduction of approximately 40
employees in connection with our acquisition of Former Nuance.
The facilities charges included $0.2 million related to the
write-down of leasehold improvements based on their net book
value relative to the fair market value for their shortened
lives. The reduction in personnel was primarily from the
research and development and sales and marketing teams, and was
based on the elimination of redundancies resulting from our
acquisition of Former Nuance.
The following table sets forth the activity relating to the
restructuring accruals in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
1,552
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,861
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Non-cash write-off
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,599
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2004
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
7,223
|
|
Non-cash write-off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,548
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
4,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
(credits)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(1,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,233
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
(2,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,668
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
530
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining personnel related accrual as of September 30,
2006 is primarily composed of amounts due under the 2005
restructuring plans which will be paid in fiscal 2007.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
The following table shows other income (expense), net in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (in
thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
3,305
|
|
|
$
|
1,244
|
|
|
$
|
429
|
|
|
|
165.7
|
%
|
|
|
190.0
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(17,614
|
)
|
|
|
(1,644
|
)
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
971.4
|
|
|
|
383.5
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,132
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
377.6
|
|
|
|
68.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(15,441
|
)
|
|
$
|
(637
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Interest income increased $2.1 million in fiscal 2006, as
compared to fiscal 2005, primarily due to higher cash and
investment balances during fiscal 2006, as compared to the prior
year, and to a lesser degree to greater yields on our cash and
investments. Interest expense increased by $16.0 million
during fiscal 2006, as compared to fiscal 2005, mainly due to
$12.2 million of interest expense paid quarterly on the new
credit facility we entered into on March 31, 2006.
Additionally, we have recorded $4.6 million of non-cash
interest expense mainly related to imputed interest in
association with certain lease obligations included in our
accrued business combination costs and accrued restructuring
charges, the amortization of debt issuance costs associated with
the new credit facility we entered into on March 31, 2006
as well as to the accretion of the interest related to the note
payable from our Phonetic acquisition in February 2005. Other
income (expense) principally consisted of foreign exchange gains
(losses) as a result of the changes in foreign exchange rates on
certain of our foreign subsidiaries whose operations are
denominated in other than their local currencies, as well as the
translation of certain of our intercompany balances.
We expect interest expense to increase in during fiscal 2007,
relative to fiscal 2006, as we pay interest on the 2006 credit
facility, and amortize the debt issuance costs, for the full
year as compared to the six month period that the debt was
outstanding in fiscal 2006. We will continue to record interest
expense as it relates to certain lease obligations included in
our accrued restructuring and accrued business combination costs.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Interest income increased $0.8 million in fiscal 2005, as
compared to fiscal 2004, primarily attributable to higher cash
and investment balances during the year. Interest expense
increased $1.3 million in fiscal 2005, as compared to
fiscal 2004, mainly due to the recognition of non cash interest
expense in association with the deferred installment payments of
$16.4 million and $17.5 million, respectively, in
connection with our acquisitions of ART and Phonetic during the
second quarter of fiscal 2005.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The following table shows the provision for income taxes in
absolute dollars and the effective income tax rate (in
thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 vs
|
|
|
2005 vs
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
15,144
|
|
|
$
|
6,812
|
|
|
$
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
122.3
|
%
|
|
|
411.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(214.2
|
)%
|
|
|
488.3
|
%
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005 and Fiscal 2004
The variance from the federal statutory rate in all periods was
due primarily to the increase in our valuation allowance with
respect to certain deferred tax assets. Valuation allowances
have been established for the U.S. net deferred tax asset, which
we believe do not meet the more likely than not
realization criteria established by SFAS 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. Due to a history of
cumulative losses in the United States, a full valuation
allowance has been recorded against the net deferred assets of
our U.S. entities. At September 30, 2006, we had a
valuation allowance for U.S. net deferred tax assets of
approximately $312.1 million. The U.S. net deferred tax
assets is composed of tax assets primarily related to net
operating loss carryforwards (resulting both from business
combinations and from operations) and tax credits, offset by
deferred tax liabilities primarily related to intangible assets.
Certain of these intangible assets have indefinite lives, and
the resulting deferred tax liability associated with these
assets is not allowed as an offset to our deferred tax assets
for purposes of determining the required amount of our valuation
allowance.
Our utilization of deferred tax assets that were acquired in a
business combination (primarily net operating loss
carryforwards) results in a reduction in the associated
valuation allowance and an increase to goodwill. Our
36
establishment of new deferred tax assets as a result of
operating activities requires the establishment of valuation
allowances based upon the SFAS 109 more likely than
not realization criteria. The establishment of a valuation
allowance relating to operating activities is recorded as an
increase to tax expense.
Our tax provision also includes state and foreign tax expense,
which is determined on either a legal entity or separate tax
jurisdiction basis.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $112.3 million as of
September 30, 2006, an increase of $16.5 million
compared to $95.8 million including marketable securities
of $24.1 million as of September 30, 2005. In
addition, we had $0.8 million and $11.7 million of
certificates of deposit relating to certain of our facilities
leases as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We
completed fiscal 2006 with working capital of $51.3 million
as compared to $12.1 million in fiscal 2005. As of
September 30, 2006, total retained deficit was
$190.1 million. We do not expect our retained deficit will
impact our future ability to operate given our strong cash and
financial position. Our cash and cash equivalents increased by
$40.6 million in fiscal 2006. This increase was composed of
cash provided by operating activities of $47.9 million,
partially offset by the net impact of cash provided by financing
activities and cash used in investing activities.
Cash
provided by operating activities
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2006 was
$47.9 million, an increase of $31.7 million, or 196%,
from $16.2 million provided by operating activities in
fiscal 2005. The increase was primarily composed of changes
relating to the net loss after adding back non-cash items such
as depreciation and amortization, and share-based compensation;
in fiscal 2006 this amount was $54.9 million compared to
$20.9 million in fiscal 2005, an increase of
$34.0 million, or 163%. This increase was offset by changes
in working capital of $2.3 million, of which an
$8.7 million use of cash for non-Dictaphone operations was
offset by $6.4 million source of cash due to changes in
Dictaphone working capital. The change in non-Dictaphone working
capital was due to improved billing and collection processes
resulting in improved days outstanding for accounts receivable
billings. The Dictaphone working capital was also positive due
to the collection of accounts receivable and acquired unbilled
accounts receivable. For both non-Dictaphone and Dictaphone
working capital, the cash provided from net accounts receivable
was offset by payments relative to accounts payable and accrued
expenses, a net decrease in deferred revenue, and a net increase
in prepaid and other assets. Deferred revenue of Dictaphone and
non-Dictaphone decreased largely due to amounts that were
included in the beginning balance sheet relating to customer
contracts also included in acquired unbilled accounts
receivable, including the deferred revenue accounts of Former
Nuance in the case of the non-Dictaphone changes.
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2005 was
$16.2 million, an increase of $9.9 million or 159%, as
compared to $6.3 million in fiscal 2004. The increase in
cash from operations was primarily due to a decrease in net loss
by $4.0 million, increased non-cash items including an
increase of $4.8 million in depreciation and amortization
expense and an increase in deferred tax provision of
$2.1 million. Also contributing to the increase in cash
from operations was an increase in accounts payable, accrued
expenses and deferred revenue totaling $19.2 million,
offset by a $24.8 million growth in accounts receivable
driven by our revenue growth of 77.5% in fiscal 2005.
Cash used
in investing activities
Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2006 was
$366.0 million, an increase of $321.4 million, or
721%, as compared to $44.6 million for fiscal 2005. The
increase in cash used in investing was primarily driven by an
increase of $331.5 million in cash paid for our
acquisitions, of which the majority of the fiscal 2006 payments
related to our acquisition of Dictaphone on March 31, 2006.
$3.8 million of the increase related to incremental
additions to property and equipment. The increase in cash used
in investing activities was partially offset by an
$11.1 million decrease in restricted cash and
$3.1 million of incremental maturities of marketable
securities.
Cash used in investing for fiscal 2005 was $44.6 million,
an increase of $15.9 million, or 55.3%, as compared to
$28.7 million in fiscal 2004. The increase in cash used in
investing was primarily driven by an increase of
37
$60.6 million in cash paid relating to various acquisitions
during fiscal 2005 and $1.3 million increase in additions
to property and equipment. These increases were partially offset
by $21.1 million of cash proceeds from maturities of
marketable securities.
Cash
provided by financing activities
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2006 was
$358.6 million, an increase of $282.1 million compared
to $76.5 million in fiscal 2005. The increase in cash
provided by financing activities was primarily driven by
$346.0 million net proceeds from the new credit facility we
entered into in March 2006. Additionally, the proceeds from the
issuance of common stock under employee based compensation plans
increased $24.6 million, or 397%. These increases were
partially offset by $73.8 million in net proceeds from the
issuance of common stock under private placements that occurred
in fiscal 2005 and deferred acquisition payments of
$14.4 million related to our acquisition of ART in fiscal
2005.
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2005 was
$76.5 million, an increase of $73.8 million compared
to $2.7 million in fiscal 2004. The increase in financing
activities was driven by net cash proceeds of $73.9 million
from the issuance of stock and warrants in a private equity
offering during fiscal 2005.
Credit
Facility
On March 31, 2006 we entered into a new senior secured
credit facility, the 2006 Credit Facility. The 2006 Credit
Facility consists of a $355.0 million,
7-year term
loan which matures on March 31, 2013 and a
$75.0 million revolving credit line which matures on
March 31, 2012. The available revolving credit line
capacity is reduced, as necessary, to account for letters of
credit outstanding. As of September 30, 2006, there were
$17.2 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line and there were no outstanding borrowings
under the revolving credit line.
Borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facility bear interest at a
rate equal to the applicable margin plus, at our option, either
(a) a base rate (which is the higher of the corporate base
rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal funds rate plus
0.50% per annum) or (b) a LIBOR rate determined by
reference to the British Bankers Association Interest
Settlement Rates for deposits in U.S. dollars. The
applicable margin for borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facility
ranges from 0.50% to 1.00% per annum with respect to base
rate borrowings and from 1.50% to 2.00% per annum with
respect to LIBOR-based borrowings, depending upon our leverage
ratio. As of September 30, 2006, our applicable margin is
1.00% for base rate borrowings and 2.00% for LIBOR-based
borrowings. We are required to pay a commitment fee for
unutilized commitments under the revolving credit facility at a
rate ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% per annum, based upon our
leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2006, our commitment
fee rate is 0.50%.
We capitalized approximately $9.0 million in debt issuance
costs related to the opening of the 2006 Credit Facility. The
costs associated with the revolving credit facility are being
amortized as interest expense over six years, through March
2012, while the costs associated with the term loan are being
amortized as interest expense over seven years, through March
2013, which is the maturity date of the revolving line and term
facility, respectively under the 2006 Credit Facility. The
effective interest rate method is used to calculate the
amortization of the debt issuance costs for both the revolving
credit facility and the term loan. These debt issuance costs,
net of accumulated amortization of $0.7 million, are
included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2006.
The $355.0 million term loan is subject to repayment
consisting of a baseline amortization of 1% per annum
($3.55 million per year, due in four equal quarterly
installments), and an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined
in the 2006 Credit Facility, which will be first payable
beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, based on the
excess cash flow generated in fiscal 2007. As of
September 30, 2006, we have repaid $1.8 million of
principal under the term loan agreement. Any borrowings not paid
through the baseline repayment, the excess cash flow sweep, or
38
any other mandatory or optional payments that we may make, will
be repaid upon maturity. If only the baseline repayments are
made, the aggregate annual maturities of the term loan would be
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
335,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
353,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our obligations under the 2006 Credit Facility are
unconditionally guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions,
each of our existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned
domestic subsidiaries. The 2006 Credit Facility and the
guarantees thereof are secured by first priority liens and
security interests in the following: 100% of the capital stock
of substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the
outstanding voting equity interests and 100% of the non-voting
equity interests of first-tier foreign subsidiaries, material
tangible and intangible assets, and present and future
intercompany debt. The 2006 Credit Facility also contains
provisions for mandatory prepayments of outstanding term loans,
subject to certain exceptions, with: 100% of net cash proceeds
of asset sales, 100% of net cash proceeds of issuance or
incurrence of debt, and 100% of extraordinary receipts. We may
voluntarily prepay the 2006 Credit Facility without premium or
penalty other than customary breakage costs with
respect to LIBOR-based loans.
The 2006 Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that,
among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our
ability to: incur additional indebtedness, create liens on
assets, enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions,
make investments, make certain acquisitions, sell assets, engage
in mergers or consolidations, pay dividends and distributions or
repurchase our capital stock, engage in certain transactions
with affiliates, change the business conducted by us, amend
certain charter documents and material agreements governing
subordinated indebtedness, prepay other indebtedness, enter into
agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries and enter
into certain derivatives transactions. The 2006 Credit Facility
is governed by financial covenants that include, but are not
limited to, maximum total leverage and minimum interest coverage
ratios, as well as to a maximum capital expenditures limitation.
The 2006 Credit Facility also contains certain customary
affirmative covenants and events of default. As of
September 30, 2006, we were in compliance with the
covenants.
We believe that cash flows from future operations in addition to
cash and marketable securities on hand will be sufficient to
meet our working capital, investing, financing and contractual
obligations, including our settlement and licensing agreement
with z4 Technologies and our anticipated acquisition of
Mobile Voice Control, Inc., as they become due for the
foreseeable future. We also believe that in the event future
operating results are not as planned, that we could take
actions, including restructuring actions and other cost
reduction initiatives, to reduce operating expenses to levels
which, in combination with expected future revenue, will
continue to generate sufficient operating cash flow. In the
event that these actions are not effective in generating
operating cash flows we may be required to issue equity or debt
securities on less than favorable terms.
39
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our outstanding contractual
obligations as of September 30, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
Next
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Term loan under credit facility(1)
|
|
$
|
353,225
|
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
|
$
|
7,100
|
|
|
$
|
7,100
|
|
|
$
|
335,475
|
|
Deferred payments on
acquisitions(2)
|
|
|
19,563
|
|
|
|
19,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
49,662
|
|
|
|
6,028
|
|
|
|
13,740
|
|
|
|
10,469
|
|
|
|
19,425
|
|
Other lease obligations associated
with the closing of duplicate facilities related to
restructurings and acquisitions(3)
|
|
|
7,051
|
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
2,991
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
Pension, minimum funding
requirement(4)
|
|
|
7,723
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase commitments(5)
|
|
|
7,506
|
|
|
|
7,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalty commitments
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
assumed(6)
|
|
|
88,918
|
|
|
|
12,371
|
|
|
|
25,982
|
|
|
|
27,811
|
|
|
|
22,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
534,718
|
|
|
$
|
53,216
|
|
|
$
|
53,647
|
|
|
$
|
49,216
|
|
|
$
|
378,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Refer to Note 10 of Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information related to credit
facility. The amounts above included principal portion only,
interest is payable quarterly in arrears, based on the interest
rates as of September 30, 2006, and the payment of
principle presented herein, we would be obligated to pay,
quarterly in arrears, at a per annum amount ranging from
$25.9 million in fiscal 2007 to $24.4 million at the
end of the seven year term. |
|
(2) |
|
Obligations include deferred payments of $2.0 million
withheld by us to satisfy claims against the former ART
shareholders under the purchase agreement and deferred payment
of $17.5 million in connection with acquisition of Phonetic
System Ltd. (Phonetic) which is due in February
2007. See Note 3 of Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
|
(3) |
|
Obligations include contractual lease commitments related to two
facilities that were part of a 2005 restructuring plan. As of
September 30, 2006, total gross lease obligations are
$3.6 million and are included in the contractual
obligations herein. The remaining obligations represents
contractual lease commitments associated with the implemented
plans to eliminate duplicate facilities in conjunction with our
acquisitions of Former Nuance and Phonetic during fiscal 2005
and our acquisition of Dictaphone during fiscal 2006, and have
been included as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet
as part of purchase accounting. As of September 30, 2006,
we have subleased two of the facilities to unrelated third
parties with total sublease income of $4.4 million through
fiscal 2013. See Note 12 and Note 13 of Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(4) |
|
Our U.K. pension plan has a minimum funding requirement of
£859,900 (approximately $1.6 million based on exchange
rate at September 30, 2006) for each of the next
5 years, through fiscal 2011. See Note 18 of Notes to
our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(5) |
|
These amounts include non-cancelable purchase commitments for
inventory in the normal course of business to fulfill
customers orders currently scheduled in our backlog. |
|
(6) |
|
Obligations include assumed long-term liabilities relating to
restructuring programs initiated by the predecessors prior to
our acquisition of SpeechWorks International, Inc. in August
2003, and our acquisition of Former Nuance in September 2005.
These restructuring programs related to the closing of two
facilities with lease terms set to expire in 2016 and 2012,
respectively. Total contractual obligations under these two
leases are $88.9 million. As of September 30, 2006, we
have
sub-leased
certain of the office space related to these two |
40
|
|
|
|
|
facilities to unrelated third parties. Total sublease income
under contractual terms is expected to be $17.4 million,
which ranges from $1.2 million to $2.3 million on an
annualized basis through 2016. See Note 12 of Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
In addition to the $17.5 million due to the former
shareholders of Phonetic as described above, we also agreed to
make contingent payments of up to $35.0 million upon the
achievement of certain performance targets in accordance with
the purchase agreement. On June 1, 2006, we notified the
former shareholders of Phonetic that the performance targets for
the first scheduled payment of up to $12.0 million were not
achieved. The former shareholders of Phonetic have objected to
this determination. We are currently in an early stage of
discussions with the former shareholders of Phonetic in regards
to this matter.
In connection with the acquisition of Brand & Groeber
Communications GbR (B&G) in September 2004, we
agreed to make contingent payments that could amount to
5.5 million based on the achievement of certain
performance targets. From the date of acquisition through
December 31, 2005, 0.4 million was paid based on
the attainment of certain performance targets. The remaining
5.1 million (approximately $6.5 million based on
the currency exchange rates as of September 30, 2006) may
be earned based on the attainment of performance targets for
calendar 2006 and, to the extent earned, would be paid in
January 2007.
In connection with our acquisition of Dictaphone Corporation in
March 2006, we are committed to pay $1.2 million in
severance and related one-time payments to former employees of
Dictaphone so long as they remain with us through specified
dates in fiscal 2007. These $1.2 million in payments are
not accrued as of September 30, 2006, as they are related
to future performance obligations of these employees.
Pension
and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
We have defined benefit pension plans that were assumed as part
of the acquisition of Dictaphone Corporation on March 31,
2006, which provide certain retirement and death benefits for
former Dictaphone employees located in the United Kingdom and
Canada. These plans require periodic cash contributions. The
Canadian plan is fully funded and expected to remain fully
funded during fiscal 2007, without additional funding by us. In
fiscal 2006, total cash funding for the UK pension plan was
$0.6 million. For the UK pension plan, we have a minimum
funding requirement of £859,900 (approximately
$1.6 million based on the exchange rate at
September 30, 2006) for each of the next 5 years,
through fiscal 2011.
We have also assumed a post-retirement health care and life
insurance benefit plan in connection with the acquisition of
Dictaphone Corporation. The plan, which is frozen, provides
certain post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits
and consists of a fixed subsidy for qualifying employees in the
United States and Canada. The plan is non-funded and cash
contributions are made each year to cover claim costs incurred
in that year. Total cash paid during fiscal 2006 for the
post-retirement health care and life insurance benefit plan was
not material.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Through September 30, 2006, we have not entered into any
off-balance sheet arrangements or material transactions with
unconsolidated entities or other persons.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments, including
those related to revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful
accounts and returns; accounting for patent legal defense costs;
the costs to complete the development of custom software
applications; the valuation of goodwill, other intangible assets
and tangible long-lived assets; accounting for acquisitions;
share-based payments; obligation relating to pension and
post-retirement benefit plans; interest rate
41
swaps which are characterized as derivative instruments; income
tax reserves and valuation allowances; and loss contingencies.
Our management bases its estimates on historical experience and
various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies most
significantly affect the portrayal of our financial condition
and results of operations and require our most difficult and
subjective judgments.
Revenue Recognition: We recognize product and
licensing revenue in accordance with Statement of Position
(SOP)
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, and
SOP 98-9,
Modification of
SOP 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain
Transactions, and related authoritative literature. The
application of
SOP 97-2
requires judgment, including whether a software arrangement
includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value exists for
those elements. Our software arrangements generally include
software and post contract support which includes telephone
support and the right to receive unspecified
upgrades/enhancements on a
when-and-if-available
basis, typically for one to three years. Changes to the elements
in a software arrangement, the ability to identify VSOE for
those elements and the fair value of the respective elements
could materially impact the amount of earned and unearned
revenue. Judgment is also required to assess whether future
releases of certain software represent new products or upgrades
and enhancements to existing products. In accordance with
SOP 97-2,
revenue is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred,
(iii) the fee is fixed or determinable and
(iv) collectibility is probable.
Non-software revenue is recognized in accordance with, the
Securities and Exchange Commissions Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) 104, Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements. Under SAB 104, we recognize
revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, (iii) the fees are fixed or determinable and
(iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
Professional services revenue is recognized in accordance with
SOP 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction Type and
Certain Performance Type Contracts on the
percentage-of-completion
method. We generally determine the
percentage-of-completion
by comparing the labor hours incurred to date to the estimated
total labor hours required to complete the project. We consider
labor hours to be the most reliable, available measure of
progress on these projects. Adjustments to estimates to complete
are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a change
become known. When the estimate indicates that a loss will be
incurred, such loss is recorded in the period identified.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the percent complete of each contract. Different assumptions
could yield materially different results.
We make estimate of sales returns based on historical
experience. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) 48, Revenue Recognition When
Right of Return Exists, the provision for these estimated
returns is recorded as a reduction of revenue and accounts
receivable at the time that the related revenue is recorded. We
also make estimates and reduce revenue recognized for price
protection and rebates, and certain marketing allowances at the
time the related revenue is recorded. If actual results differ
significantly from our estimates, such differences could have a
material impact on our results of operations for the period in
which the actual results become known.
Our revenue recognition policies require management to make
significant estimates. Management analyzes various factors,
including a review of specific transactions, historical
experience, creditworthiness of customers and current market and
economic conditions. Changes in judgments based upon these
factors could impact the timing and amount of revenue and cost
recognized and thus affects our results of operations and
financial condition.
Capitalized Patent Defense Costs: We monitor
the anticipated outcome of legal actions, and if we determine
that the success of the defense of a patent is probable, and so
long as we believe that the future economic benefit of the
patent will be increased, we then capitalize external legal
costs incurred in the defense of these patents, up to the level
of the expected increased future economic benefit. If changes in
the anticipated outcome occur, we write off any capitalized
costs in the period the change is determined. As of
September 30, 2006 and 2005, capitalized patent defense
costs totaled $6.4 million and $2.3 million,
respectively.
Research and Development Costs: We account for
the internal costs relating to research and development
activities in accordance with SFAS 2, Accounting for
Research and Development Costs, and SFAS 86,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold,
Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Research and
42
development costs incurred for new software products and
enhancements to existing products, other than certain software
development costs that qualify for capitalization, are expensed
as incurred. Software development costs incurred subsequent to
the establishment of technological feasibility, but prior to the
general release of the product, are capitalized and amortized to
cost of revenue over the estimated useful life of the related
products. Judgment is required in determining when technological
feasibility of a product is established. We have determined that
technological feasibility for our software products is reached
shortly before the products are released to manufacturing. Costs
incurred after technological feasibility is established have not
been material, and accordingly, we have expensed the internal
costs relating to research and development when incurred.
Purchased Computer Software: The cost of
purchased computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise
marketed is capitalized if the purchased software has an
alternative future use. Otherwise, the cost is expensed as
incurred. Capitalized purchased computer software is amortized
to cost of revenue over the estimated useful life of the related
products. At each balance sheet date, we evaluate these assets
for impairment by comparing the unamortized cost to the net
realizable value. Amortization expense was $5.1 million,
$2.1 million and $1.6 million for fiscal 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively. Included in the fiscal 2006 amortization
expense was an additional $2.6 million of expense
representing an impairment determined to exist in order to value
the purchased computer software at its net realizable value. See
Note 8 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. The net unamortized purchased computer software
included in other intangible assets at September 30, 2006
and 2005 were $1.6 million and $5.2 million,
respectively.
Valuation of Long-lived Tangible and Intangible Assets and
Goodwill: We have significant long-lived tangible
and intangible assets, including goodwill and intangible assets
with indefinite lives, which are susceptible to valuation
adjustments as a result of changes in various factors or
conditions. The most significant long-lived tangible and
intangible assets are fixed assets, patents and core technology,
completed technology, customer relationships and trademarks. All
finite-lived intangible assets are amortized based upon patterns
in which the economic benefits of customer relationships are
expected to be utilized. The values of intangible assets, with
the exception of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite
lives, were initially determined by a risk-adjusted, discounted
cash flow approach. We assess the potential impairment of
identifiable intangible assets and fixed assets whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values
may not be recoverable and at least annually. Factors we
consider important, which could trigger an impairment of such
assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained
period; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would materially
impact future results of operations and financial position in
the reporting period identified.
In accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, we test goodwill and intangible assets
with indefinite lives for impairment on an annual basis as of
July 1, and between annual tests if indicators of potential
impairment exist. The impairment test compares the fair value of
the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill
and intangible assets with indefinite lives, to assess whether
impairment is present. We have reviewed the provisions of
SFAS 142 with respect to the criteria necessary to evaluate
the number of reporting units that exist. Based on our review,
we have determined that we operate in one reporting unit. Based
on this assessment, we have not had any impairment charges
during our history as a result of our impairment evaluation of
goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets under
SFAS 142.
In accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we
periodically review long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or
that the useful lives of those assets are no longer appropriate.
Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the
undiscounted cash flows to the recorded carrying value for the
asset. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to
its estimated fair value based on a
43
discounted cash flow analysis. No impairment charges were taken
in fiscal 2006, 2005 or 2004, based on the review of long-lived
assets under SFAS 144.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the useful lives of our long-lived assets, determining what
reporting units exist and assessing when events or circumstances
would require an interim impairment analysis of goodwill or
other long-lived assets to be performed. Changes in our
organization or our management reporting structure, as well as
other events and circumstances, including but not limited to
technological advances, increased competition and changing
economic or market conditions, could result in (a) shorter
estimated useful lives, (b) additional reporting units,
which may require alternative methods of estimating fair values
or greater disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by
reporting unit,
and/or
(c) other changes in previous assumptions or estimates. In
turn, this could have a significant impact on our consolidated
financial statements through accelerated amortization
and/or
impairment charges.
Accounting for Acquisitions: We have completed
a number of significant business and other asset acquisitions
over the preceding five years which have resulted in significant
goodwill and other intangible asset balances. Our future
business strategy contemplates that we may continue to pursue
additional acquisitions in the future. Our accounting for
acquisitions involves significant judgments and estimates
primarily, but not limited to: the fair value of certain forms
of consideration, the fair value of acquired intangible assets,
which involve projections of future revenue and cash flows, the
fair value of other acquired assets and assumed liabilities,
including potential contingencies, and the useful lives and, as
applicable, the reporting unit, of the assets. Our financial
position or results of operations may be materially impacted by
changes in our initial assumptions and estimates relating to
prior or future acquisitions. Additionally, under SFAS 142,
we determine the fair value of the reporting unit, for purposes
of the first step in our annual goodwill impairment test, based
on our market value. If prior or future acquisitions are not
accretive to our results of operations as expected, our market
value declines dramatically, or we determine we have more than
one reporting unit, we may be required to complete the second
step which requires significant judgments and estimates and
which may result in material impairment charges in the period in
which they are determined.
Accounting for Long-Term Facility
Obligations: We have historically acquired
companies which have previously established restructuring
charges relating to lease exit costs, and we have recorded
restructuring charges of our own that include lease exit costs.
We follow the provisions of
EITF 95-3
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination or SFAS 146 Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities as
applicable. In accounting for these obligations, we are required
to make assumptions relating to the time period over which the
facility will remain vacant, sublease terms, sublease rates and
discount rates. We base our estimates and assumptions on the
best information available at the time of the obligation having
arisen. These estimates are reviewed and revised as facts and
circumstances dictate; changes in these estimates could have a
material effect on the amount accrued on the balance sheet.
Accounting for Share-Based Payments: We
account for share-based payments in accordance with
SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Under the
fair value recognition provisions of this statement, share-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the
value of the award and is recognized as expense over the
requisite service period which is generally the vesting period.
Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant
date requires judgment, including estimating expected dividends,
share price volatility and the amount of share-based awards that
are expected to be forfeited. If actual results differ
significantly from these estimates, share-based compensation
expense and our results of operations could be materially
impacted.
Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans: We
have defined benefit pension plans that were assumed as part of
the acquisition of Dictaphone Corporation on March 31,
2006, which provide certain retirement and death benefits for
former Dictaphone employees located in the United Kingdom and
Canada. The Company also assumed a post-retirement health care
and life insurance benefit plan, which is frozen relative to new
enrollment, and which provides certain post-retirement health
care and life insurance benefits, as well as a fixed subsidy for
qualified former employees in the United States and Canada. We
use several actuarial and other factors which attempt to
estimate the ultimate expense, liability and assets values
related to our pension and post-retirement benefit plans. These
factors include assumptions about discount rates, expected
return on plan assets and the rate of future compensation
increases. In addition, subjective assumptions, such as
withdrawal and mortality rates, are also
44
utilized. The assumptions may differ materially from actual
results due to the changing market and economic condition or
other factors, and depending on their magnitude, could have a
significant impact on the amount we recorded. Pension and
post-retirement benefit plan assumptions are included in
Note 18 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes: Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the
differences are expected to reverse. We do not provide for
U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of its
foreign subsidiaries, which we considers to be indefinitely
reinvested outside of the U.S. in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 23,
Accounting for Income Taxes Special
Areas.
We make judgments regarding the realizability of our deferred
tax assets. In accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes, the carrying value of the net deferred
tax assets is based on the belief that it is more likely than
not that we will generate sufficient future taxable income to
realize these deferred tax assets after consideration of all
available evidence. We regularly review our deferred tax assets
for recoverability considering historical profitability,
projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the
reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning
strategies.
Valuation allowances have been established for
U.S. deferred tax assets, which we believe do not meet the
more likely than not criteria established by
SFAS 109. If we are subsequently able to utilize all or a
portion of the deferred tax assets for which a valuation
allowance has been established, then we may be required to
recognize these deferred tax assets through the reduction of the
valuation allowance which would result in a material benefit to
our results of operations in the period in which the benefit is
determined, excluding the recognition of the portion of the
valuation allowance which relates to net deferred tax assets
acquired in a business combination and created as a result of
share-based payments. The recognition of the portion of the
valuation allowance which relates to net deferred tax assets
resulting from share-based payments will be recorded as
additional
paid-in-capital;
the recognition of the portion of the valuation allowance which
relates to net deferred tax assets acquired in a business
combination will reduce goodwill, other intangible assets, and
to the extent remaining, the provision for income taxes.
Loss Contingencies: We are subject to legal
proceedings, lawsuits and other claims relating to labor,
service and other matters arising in the ordinary course of
business, as discussed in Note 17 of Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Quarterly, we review the
status of each significant matter and assess our potential
financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or
legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be
reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated
loss. Significant judgment is required in both the determination
of probability and the determination as to whether an exposure
is reasonably estimable. Because of uncertainties related to
these matters, accruals are based only on the best information
available at the time. As additional information becomes
available, we reassess the potential liability related to our
pending claims and litigation and may revise our estimates. Such
revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could
have a material impact on our results of operations and
financial position.
45
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB
Statements 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)
(SFAS 158). SFAS 158 requires an employer
to recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined
benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as
an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and
to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which
the changes occur through comprehensive income. SFAS 158
also requires the measurement of defined benefit plan assets and
obligations as of the date of the employers fiscal
year-end statement of financial position (with limited
exceptions). Under SFAS 158, we will be required to
recognize the funded status of its defined benefit
postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures
commencing as of September 30, 2007. The requirement to
measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of
the employers fiscal year-end is effective for our fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009. We are currently evaluating
the impact that SFAS 158 will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2006, the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission issued SAB 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements. This SAB provides
guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year
misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the
purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB 108 establishes an
approach that requires quantification of financial statement
errors based on the effects of each of our financial statements
and the related financial statement disclosures. The SAB permits
existing public companies to record the cumulative effect of
initially applying this approach in the first year ending after
November 15, 2006 by recording the necessary correcting
adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities as
of the beginning of that year with the offsetting adjustment
recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings.
Additionally, the use of the cumulative effect transition method
requires detailed disclosure of the nature and amount of each
individual error being corrected through the cumulative
adjustment and how and when it arose. We do not anticipate that
SAB 108 will have a material impact on our financial
statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a companys financial statements in
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes the recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for
our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2007. We are currently
evaluating the effect that the adoption of FIN 48 will have
on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2006, the FASB issued EITF
06-03,
How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to
Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income
Statement (That is, Gross versus Net Presentation) that
clarifies how a company discloses its recording of taxes
collected that are imposed on revenue-producing activities. EITF
06-03 is
effective for the first interim reporting period beginning after
December 15, 2006, and thus we are required to adopt this
standard as of January 1, 2007, in the second quarter of
our fiscal year 2007. We are evaluating the impact, if any, that
EITF 06-03
may have on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments,
which amends SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities and SFAS 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS 155
simplifies the accounting for certain derivatives embedded in
other financial instruments by allowing them to be accounted for
as a whole if the holder elects to account for the whole
instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS 155 also clarifies
and amends certain other provisions of SFAS 133 and
SFAS 140. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial
instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement event
occurring in fiscal years beginning after September 15,
2006 and is therefore required to be adopted by us as of
October 1, 2006. We do not anticipate the adoption of
SFAS 155 will have any impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces APB 20,
Accounting Changes and SFAS 3, Reporting
Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements
An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28. SFAS 154
provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of
accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes
retrospective application, or the latest practicable date, as
46
the required method for reporting a change in accounting
principle and the reporting of a correction of an error.
SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005 and is therefore required to be adopted
by us as of October 1, 2006. To the extent we make any
accounting changes or error correction in future periods the
adoption of SFAS 154 could have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates and interest rates, which could affect operating
results, financial position and cash flows. We manage our
exposure to these market risks through our regular operating and
financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use of
derivative financial instruments.
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Any foreign currency transaction, defined as a transaction
denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, will
be reported in U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange
rate. Assets and liabilities are translated into
U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date and income and expense items are translated at
average rates for the period. The primary foreign currency
denominated transactions include revenue and expenses and the
resulting accounts receivable and accounts payable balances
reflected on our balance sheet. Therefore, the change in the
value of the U.S. dollar as compared to foreign currencies
will have either a positive or negative effect on our financial
position and results of operations. Historically, our primary
exposure has related to transactions denominated in the Euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Israeli New
Shekel, and Hungarian Forint.
Assuming a 10% appreciation or depreciation in foreign currency
exchange rates from the quoted foreign currency exchange rates
at September 30, 2006, the impact to our revenue, operating
results or cash flows could be adversely affected.
In certain instances, we have entered into forward exchange
derivative contracts to hedge against foreign currency
fluctuations. In all cases, we use these derivative instruments
to reduce our foreign exchange risk by essentially creating
offsetting market exposures. The success of the hedging program
depends on our forecasts of transaction activity in the various
currencies. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. At September 30, 2006, there were no
outstanding derivative foreign exchange hedging instruments and
we did not enter into any forward exchange derivative contracts
during fiscal 2006.
On November 3, 2003, we entered into a forward exchange
derivative contract to hedge our foreign currency exposure
related to 3.5 million euros of inter-company receivables
from our Belgian subsidiary to the United States. The contract
had a one-year term that expired on November 1, 2004. On
November 1, 2004, we renewed this forward hedge contract;
the renewed contract had a one-year term expiring on
November 1, 2005; however it was cancelable at our
discretion. In February 2005, the Company liquidated the
contract. For fiscal year 2005 and 2004, the Company realized a
loss of $0.4 million, and recognized a gain of less than
$0.1 million, respectively, related to this hedge.
On November 5, 2003, we entered into a forward exchange
derivative contract to hedge our foreign currency exposure
related to 7.5 million Singapore Dollars of inter-company
receivables from our Singapore subsidiary to the United States.
The original contract expired on January 30, 2004, but was
extended to October 29, 2004. The contract was terminated
on October 29, 2004. We realized a loss of approximately
$0.2 million in connection with the termination of this
hedge.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our
significant cash and cash equivalents, and the outstanding debt
under the 2006 Credit Facility.
At September 30, 2006, we held approximately
$112.3 million of cash and cash equivalents primarily
consisting of cash and money-market funds. Due to the low
current market yields and the short-term nature of our
47
investments, a hypothetical change in market rates is not
expected to have a material effect on the fair value of our
portfolio or results of operations.
At September 30, 2006, our total outstanding debt balance
exposed to variable interest rates was $353.2 million. To
partially offset this variable interest rate exposure, the
Company entered into a $100 million interest rate swap
derivative contract. The interest rate swap is structured to
offset period changes in the variable interest rate without
changing the characteristics of the underlying debt instrument.
A hypothetical change in market rates would have a significant
impact on the interest expense and amounts payable relating to
the $253.2 million of debt that is not offset by the
interest rate swap; assuming a 1.0% change in interest rates,
the interest expense would increase $2.5 million per annum.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Nuance
Communications, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements
48
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
49
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Nuance Communications, Inc. (the Company) as of
September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended September 30, 2006, and for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2004. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Nuance Communications, Inc. at September 30,
2006 and 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended
September 30, 2006, and for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Nuance Communications, Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated December 14, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
As described in note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, Nuance Communications, Inc. adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
effective October 1, 2005.
BDO Seidman, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 14, 2006
50
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting, that Nuance Communications, Inc. (the
Company) maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, managements
assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting did not include the internal
controls of Dictaphone Corporation, which the Company acquired
on March 31, 2006, and which is included in the 2006
consolidated financial statements of Nuance Communications, Inc.
from the date of the acquisition and constituted approximately
42.8% of consolidated assets as of September 30, 2006, and
approximately 20.1% of consolidated revenue for the year ended
September 30, 2006. Management did not assess the
effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting of
Dictaphone Corporation because the Company acquired this entity
during its fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. Refer to
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further
discussion of this acquisition and its impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements. Our audit of
internal control over financial reporting of Nuance
Communications, Inc. also did not include an evaluation of the
internal control over financial reporting of Dictaphone
Corporation.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Nuance
Communications, Inc. maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by COSO. Also, in our opinion, Nuance Communications,
Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006,
based on the criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
51
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
2006 consolidated financial statements of Nuance Communications,
Inc. and our report dated December 14, 2006 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon and indicated that the Company
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
effective October 1, 2005.
BDO Seidman, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 14, 2006
52
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
112,334
|
|
|
$
|
71,687
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,127
|
|
Accounts receivable, less
allowances of $18,201 and $13,118, respectively
|
|
|
110,778
|
|
|
|
66,488
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts
receivable
|
|
|
19,748
|
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
6,795
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
13,245
|
|
|
|
9,235
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
263,321
|
|
|
|
174,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
30,700
|
|
|
|
14,333
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
699,333
|
|
|
|
458,313
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
220,040
|
|
|
|
92,350
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
21,680
|
|
|
|
17,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,235,074
|
|
|
$
|
757,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
and obligations under capital leases
|
|
$
|
3,953
|
|
|
$
|
27,711
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
27,768
|
|
|
|
17,347
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
52,674
|
|
|
|
60,153
|
|
Current portion of accrued business
combination costs
|
|
|
14,810
|
|
|
|
17,027
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
|
63,269
|
|
|
|
13,298
|
|
Unearned revenue and customer
deposits
|
|
|
30,320
|
|
|
|
10,822
|
|
Deferred acquisition payments, net
|
|
|
19,254
|
|
|
|
16,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
212,048
|
|
|
|
162,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and obligations
under capital leases, net of current portion
|
|
|
349,990
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Accrued business combination costs,
net of current portion
|
|
|
45,255
|
|
|
|
54,972
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue, net
of current portion
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
19,926
|
|
|
|
4,241
|
|
Deferred acquisition payments,
net Phonetic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,266
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
21,459
|
|
|
|
3,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
658,478
|
|
|
|
242,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock,
$0.001 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized;
3,562,238 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation
preference $4,631)
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par
value; 280,000,000 shares authorized; 173,182,430 and
159,431,907 shares issued and 170,152,247 and
156,585,046 shares outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
773,120
|
|
|
|
699,427
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (3,030,183
and 2,846,861 shares, respectively)
|
|
|
(12,859
|
)
|
|
|
(11,432
|
)
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,782
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(190,126
|
)
|
|
|
(167,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
576,596
|
|
|
|
514,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,235,074
|
|
|
$
|
757,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
53
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
$
|
235,825
|
|
|
$
|
171,200
|
|
|
$
|
98,262
|
|
Professional services,
subscription and hosting
|
|
|
81,320
|
|
|
|
47,308
|
|
|
|
25,358
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
71,365
|
|
|
|
13,880
|
|
|
|
7,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
388,510
|
|
|
|
232,388
|
|
|
|
130,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
|
31,394
|
|
|
|
20,378
|
|
|
|
10,348
|
|
Cost of professional services,
subscription and hosting
|
|
|
59,015
|
|
|
|
34,737
|
|
|
|
20,456
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
17,723
|
|
|
|
4,938
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
Cost of revenue from amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
12,911
|
|
|
|
9,150
|
|
|
|
8,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
121,043
|
|
|
|
69,203
|
|
|
|
41,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
267,467
|
|
|
|
163,185
|
|
|
|
89,113
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
59,403
|
|
|
|
39,190
|
|
|
|
26,390
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
128,412
|
|
|
|
78,797
|
|
|
|
49,554
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
55,343
|
|
|
|
31,959
|
|
|
|
18,394
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
|
17,172
|
|
|
|
3,984
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
(credits), net
|
|
|
(1,233
|
)
|
|
|
7,223
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
259,097
|
|
|
|
161,153
|
|
|
|
97,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
8,370
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
(7,993
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(17,614
|
)
|
|
|
(1,644
|
)
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1,132
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(7,071
|
)
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
(8,045
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
15,144
|
|
|
|
6,812
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
(22,215
|
)
|
|
|
(5,417
|
)
|
|
|
(9,378
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(22,887
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,417
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
163,873
|
|
|
|
109,540
|
|
|
|
103,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
54
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
3,562,238
|
|
|
$
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
105,327,485
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
464,350
|
|
|
|
2,735,466
|
|
|
$
|
(10,925
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,743
|
)
|
|
$
|
(748
|
)
|
|
$
|
(152,444
|
)
|
|
$
|
303,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock-based compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,570,697
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
706,504
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5,253
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of warrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense associated
with restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,041
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,378
|
)
|
|
|
(9,378
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,378
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on marketable
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9,473
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2004
|
|
|
3,562,238
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
108,604,686
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
476,206
|
|
|
|
2,771,507
|
|
|
|
(11,071
|
)
|
|
|
(5,465
|
)
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
(161,822
|
)
|
|
|
301,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock-based compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,040,339
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock in connection
with Rhetorical acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of warrant in connection
with Phonetic acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock in connection
with MedRemote acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544,228
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock and stock options
in connection with Nuance acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,760,031
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
132,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock and warrants in
private placements of common stock, net of offering costs of
$1,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,688,679
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
73,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,095
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense associated
with restricted stock and stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,354
|
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,417
|
)
|
|
|
(5,417
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,417
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,355
|
)
|
|
|
(1,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,674
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
3,562,238
|
|
|
$
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
159,431,907
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
699,427
|
|
|
|
2,846,861
|
|
|
|
(11,432
|
)
|
|
|
(8,782
|
)
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
(167,239
|
)
|
|
|
514,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock-based compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,002,211
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
31,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,194,958
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted stock
relating to employee tax withholding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to
non-employee for service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon
conversion of convertible debenture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,587,334
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
27,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payments, including
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based
payment plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,322
|
|
|
|
(1,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Additional offering costs related
to 2005 issuance of stock and warrants in private placements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,887
|
)
|
|
|
(22,887
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,887
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow
hedge derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,284
|
|
|
|
4,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
3,562,238
|
|
|
$
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
173,182,430
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
773,120
|
|
|
|
3,030,183
|
|
|
$
|
(12,859
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,656
|
|
|
$
|
(190,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
576,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
55
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(22,887
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,417
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,378
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property and
equipment
|
|
|
8,366
|
|
|
|
5,019
|
|
|
|
2,919
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
|
30,083
|
|
|
|
13,134
|
|
|
|
10,399
|
|
Accounts receivable allowances
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Non-cash portion of restructuring
charges
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
Share-based payments, including
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
22,539
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
113
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
3,862
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Deferred tax provision
|
|
|
8,811
|
|
|
|
2,962
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
Normalization of rent expense
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
16,599
|
|
|
|
(19,832
|
)
|
|
|
4,990
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,781
|
)
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(5,208
|
)
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
(967
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
7,534
|
|
|
|
6,687
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
|
|
(12,910
|
)
|
|
|
3,719
|
|
|
|
(3,710
|
)
|
Deferred maintenance revenue,
unearned revenue and customer deposits
|
|
|
(11,186
|
)
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
|
|
(2,757
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
47,947
|
|
|
|
16,198
|
|
|
|
6,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for property
and equipment
|
|
|
(8,447
|
)
|
|
|
(4,598
|
)
|
|
|
(3,281
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of
cash acquired
|
|
|
(392,826
|
)
|
|
|
(61,287
|
)
|
|
|
(734
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturities of
marketable securities
|
|
|
24,159
|
|
|
|
21,089
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,960
|
)
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
11,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(365,983
|
)
|
|
|
(44,582
|
)
|
|
|
(28,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of note payable, capital
leases and deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
(16,667
|
)
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
(721
|
)
|
Proceeds from credit facility, net
of issuance costs
|
|
|
346,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments associated with licensing
agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,800
|
)
|
|
|
(2,800
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(1,427
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
Payments under deferred payment
agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock and common stock warrants, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
73,911
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under employee share-based payment plans
|
|
|
30,780
|
|
|
|
6,190
|
|
|
|
6,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
358,579
|
|
|
|
76,477
|
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
40,647
|
|
|
|
48,724
|
|
|
|
(19,621
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
71,687
|
|
|
|
22,963
|
|
|
|
42,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
|
$
|
112,334
|
|
|
$
|
71,687
|
|
|
$
|
22,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
56
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business and Basis of Presentation
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. (the Company or
Nuance) offers businesses and consumers competitive
and value-added speech, dictation and imaging solutions that
facilitate the way people access, share, manage and use
information in business and daily life. The Company was
incorporated in 1992 as Visioneer, Inc. In 1999, the Company
changed its name to ScanSoft, Inc., and changed its ticker
symbol to SSFT. In October 2005, the Company changed its name to
Nuance Communications, Inc. and changed its ticker symbol to
NUAN in November 2005.
During fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006, the Company acquired the
following businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
June 15, 2004 Telelogue, Inc.
(Telelogue);
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2004 Brand & Groeber
Communications GbR (B&G);
|
|
|
|
December 6, 2004 Rhetorical Systems, Ltd.
(Rhetorical);
|
|
|
|
January 21, 2005 ART Advanced Recognition
Technologies, Inc. (ART);
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 Phonetic Systems Ltd.
(Phonetic);
|
|
|
|
May 12, 2005 MedRemote, Inc.
(MedRemote);
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2005 Nuance Communications, Inc.
(Former Nuance); and
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 Dictaphone Corporation
(Dictaphone).
|
Each of these acquisitions has been accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the results of
operations from the acquired businesses have been included in
the Companys consolidated financial statements since the
acquisition dates.
Reclassification: Certain amounts in prior
periods consolidated financial statements presented have
been reclassified to conform to the current years
presentation. These reclassifications include separate
disclosures for (i) acquired unbilled accounts
receivable on the consolidated balance sheets, which were
previously within accounts receivable;
(ii) deferred maintenance revenue and
unearned revenue and customer deposits on the
consolidated balance sheets, which were previously combined as
deferred revenue; and (iii) maintenance
revenue and the related costs of revenue which were
previously combined with professional services,
subscription and hosting revenue and the related costs on
the consolidated statements of operations.
Change in Fiscal Year: On October 23,
2004 the Companys Board of Directors approved a change in
the Companys fiscal year end from December 31 to
September 30, effective beginning September 30, 2004.
All references in the consolidated financial statements to the
period ended September 30, 2004, or fiscal 2004, refers to
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its
estimates, assumptions and judgments, including those related to
revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful accounts and
returns; accounting for patent legal defense costs; the costs to
complete the development of custom software applications; the
valuation of goodwill, other intangible assets and tangible
long-lived assets; accounting for acquisitions; share-based
payments; the obligation relating to pension and post-retirement
benefit plans; interest rate swaps which are characterized as
derivative instruments; income tax reserves and valuation
allowances; and loss contingencies. The Company bases its
estimates on historical experience and various other
57
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
factors that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual amounts could differ significantly from
these estimates.
Basis of Consolidation: The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and
balances have been eliminated.
Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes
software revenue in accordance with Statement of Position
(SOP)
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by
SOP 98-9
and all related interpretations. Non-software revenue is
recognized in accordance with, the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
104, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,
and
SOP 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction Type and
Certain Performance Type Contracts. For revenue
arrangements with multiple elements outside of the scope of
SOP 97-2,
the Company accounts for the arrangements in accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Elements, and
allocates an arrangements fees into separate units
accounting based on their relative fair value. In select
situations, we sell or license intellectual property in
conjunction with, or in place of, embedding our intellectual
property in software. In general, the Company recognizes revenue
when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, collectibility is
probable, and vendor specific objective evidence
(VSOE) of fair value exists for any undelivered
elements. When contracts contain substantive customer acceptance
provisions, revenue and related costs are deferred until such
acceptance is obtained. The Company reduces revenue recognized
for estimated future returns, price protection and rebates, and
certain marketing allowances at the time the related revenue is
recorded.
When products are sold through distributors or resellers, title
and risk of loss generally passes upon shipment, at which time
the transaction is invoiced and payment is due. Shipments to
distributors and resellers without right of return are
recognized as revenue upon shipment by the Company. Certain
distributors and value-added resellers have been granted rights
of return for as long as the distributors or resellers hold the
inventory. The Company has not analyzed historical returns from
these distributors and resellers to estimate future sales
returns. As a result, the Company recognizes revenue from sales
to these distributors and resellers when the products are sold
through to retailers and end-users. Based on reports from
distributors and resellers of their inventory balances at the
end of each period, the Company records an allowance against
accounts receivable and reduces revenue for all inventories
subject to return at the sales price.
The Company also makes an estimate of sales returns based on
historical experience. In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) 48, Revenue
Recognition When Right of Return Exists, the provision for
these estimated returns is recorded as a reduction of revenue
and accounts receivable at the time that the related revenue is
recorded. If actual returns differ significantly from the
Companys estimates, such differences could have a material
impact on the Companys results of operations for the
period in which the actual returns become known.
Revenue from royalties on sales of the Companys products
by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), where no
services are included, is recognized in the quarter earned so
long as the Company has been notified by the OEM that such
royalties are due, and provided that all other revenue
recognition criteria are met.
Revenue from products offered on a subscription
and/or
hosting basis is recognized in the period the services are
provided, based on a fixed minimum fee
and/or
variable fees based on the volume of activity. Subscription and
hosting revenue is recognized as the Company is notified by the
customer or through management reports that such revenue is due,
provided that all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
When the Company provides maintenance and support services, it
recognizes the revenue ratably over the term of the related
contracts, typically one to three years. When maintenance and
support contracts renew automatically, the Company provides a
reserve based on historical experience for contracts expected to
be cancelled for non-payment. All known and estimated
cancellations are recorded as a reduction to revenue and
accounts receivable.
58
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Professional services are generally not considered essential to
the functionality of the software and are recognized as revenue
when the related services are performed. Professional services
revenue is generally recognized based on the
percentage-of-completion
method in accordance with
SOP 81-1.
The Company generally determines the
percentage-of-completion
by comparing the labor hours incurred to date to the estimated
total labor hours required to complete the project. The Company
considers labor hours to be the most reliable, available measure
of progress on these projects. Adjustments to estimates to
complete are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a
change become known. When the estimate indicates that a loss
will be incurred, such loss is recorded in the period
identified. Significant judgments and estimates are involved in
determining the percent complete of each contract. Different
assumptions could yield materially different results. When the
Company provides services on a time and materials basis, it
recognizes revenue as it performs the services based on actual
time incurred.
The Company may sell, under one contract or related contracts,
software licenses, professional services,
and/or a
maintenance and support arrangement. The total contract value is
attributed first to the undelivered elements based on VSOE of
their fair value. VSOE is established by the price charged when
that element is sold separately. The remainder of the contract
value is attributed to the delivered elements, typically
software licenses, which are typically recognized as revenue
upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria
are met. When the Company provides professional services
considered essential to the functionality of the software, such
as custom application development for a fixed fee, it recognizes
revenue from the services as well as any related software
licenses on a
percentage-of-completion
basis.
The Company follows the guidance of EITF
01-09,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor (Including
a Reseller of the Vendors Products), and records
consideration given to a reseller as a reduction of revenue to
the extent the Company has recorded cumulative revenue from the
customer or reseller. However, when the Company receives an
identifiable benefit in exchange for the consideration and can
reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received, the
consideration is recorded as an operating expense.
The Company follows the guidance of EITF
01-14,
Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements for
Out-of-Pocket
Expenses Incurred, and records reimbursements received for
out- of-pocket expenses as revenue, with offsetting costs
recorded as cost of revenue.
Out-of-pocket
expenses generally include, but are not limited to, expenses
related to transportation, lodging and meals.
The Company follows the guidance of EITF
00-10,
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs,
and records shipping and handling costs billed to customers as
revenue with offsetting costs recorded as cost of revenue.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash
equivalents consists of cash on hand, including money market
funds and commercial paper with original maturities of
90 days or less.
Allowance against Accounts Receivables: The
Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for the
estimated probable losses on uncollectible accounts receivable.
The allowance is based upon the credit worthiness of its
customers, its historical experience, the age of the receivable
and current market and economic conditions. Receivables are
written off against these reserves in the period they are
determined to be uncollectible. For sell-through arrangements
with certain distributors or resellers for whom the Company does
not have history, the Company maintains an allowance against
accounts receivable for all product subject to return at the
sales price. The allowance is recorded based upon ending product
balance held by these distributors or resellers at the end of
each period and receivables are written off against these
reserves in the period the product is returned. The Company also
maintains an allowance for sales returns from customers for
which they have historical experience. The returns allowance is
recorded as a reduction in revenue and accounts receivable at
the time that the related revenue is recorded and the
receivables are written off against the allowance in the period
the return is received.
Inventories: Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost, computed using the
first-in,
first-out method, or market. The Company regularly reviews
inventory quantities on hand and records a provision for excess
and/or
59
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
obsolete inventory primarily based on future purchase
commitments with its suppliers, and the estimated utility of its
inventory as well as other factors including technological
changes and new product development.
Land, Building and Equipment: Land, building
and equipment are stated at cost. Building and equipment are
depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold
improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term
or the estimated useful life. Computer software developed or
obtained for internal use is accounted for under
SOP 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use, and is depreciated over the
estimated useful life of the software, generally five years or
less. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method.
Significant improvements are capitalized and repairs and
maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. The cost and related
accumulated depreciation of sold or retired assets are removed
from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operations.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: The
Company has significant long-lived tangible and intangible
assets, including goodwill and intangible asset with indefinite
lives, which are susceptible to valuation adjustments as a
result of changes in various factors or conditions. The most
significant long-lived tangible and other intangible assets are
fixed assets, patents and core technology, completed technology,
customer relationships and trademarks. All finite-lived
intangible assets are amortized based upon patterns in which the
economic benefits of such assets are expected to be utilized.
The values of intangible assets, with the exception of goodwill
and intangible assets with indefinite lives, were initially
determined by a risk-adjusted, discounted cash flow approach.
The Company assesses the potential impairment of identifiable
intangible assets and fixed assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be
recoverable. Factors it considers important, which could trigger
an impairment of such assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for the Companys overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in the Companys stock price for a
sustained period; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in the Companys market capitalization below net
book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact future
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified.
In accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are tested for impairment on an annual basis as
of July 1, and between annual tests if indicators of
potential impairment exist. The impairment test compares the
fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount,
including goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives,
to assess whether impairment is present. The Company has
reviewed the provisions of SFAS 142 with respect to the
criteria necessary to evaluate the number of reporting units
that exist. Based on its review, the Company has determined that
it operates in one reporting unit. Based on this assessment, the
Company has not had any impairment charges during its history as
a result of its impairment evaluation of goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets under SFAS 142.
In accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company
periodically reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or
that the useful lives of those assets are no longer appropriate.
Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the
undiscounted cash flows to the recorded value for the asset. If
impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its
estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis.
No impairment charges were taken in fiscal 2006, 2005 or 2004,
based on the review of long-lived assets under SFAS 144.
60
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the useful lives and amortization patterns of long-lived assets,
determining what reporting units exist and assessing when events
or circumstances would require an interim impairment analysis of
goodwill or other long-lived assets to be performed. Changes in
the organization or the Companys management reporting
structure, as well as other events and circumstances, including
but not limited to technological advances, increased competition
and changing economic or market conditions, could result in
(a) shorter estimated useful lives, (b) additional
reporting units, which may require alternative methods of
estimating fair values or greater disaggregation or aggregation
in our analysis by reporting unit,
and/or
(c) other changes in previous assumptions or estimates. In
turn, this could have a significant impact on the consolidated
financial statements through accelerated amortization
and/or
impairment charges (Notes 7 and 8).
Research and Development Costs: Internal costs
relating to research and development costs incurred for new
software products and enhancements to existing products, other
than certain software development costs that qualify for
capitalization, are expensed as incurred. Software development
costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological
feasibility, but prior to the general release of the product,
are capitalized and amortized to cost of revenue over the
estimated useful life of the related products. The Company has
determined that technological feasibility for its software
products is reached shortly before the products are released to
manufacturing. Costs incurred after technological feasibility is
established have not been material, and accordingly, the Company
has expensed the internal costs relating to research and
development when incurred.
Purchased Computer Software: The cost of
purchased computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise
marketed is capitalized if the purchased software has an
alternative future use. Otherwise, the cost is expensed as
incurred. Capitalized purchased computer software is amortized
to cost of revenue over the estimated useful life of the related
products. At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates
these assets for impairment by comparing the unamortized cost to
the net realizable value. Amortization expense was
$5.1 million, $2.1 million and $1.6 million for
fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Included in the fiscal
2006 amortization expense was an additional $2.6 million of
expense representing an impairment determined to exist in order
to value the purchased computer software at its net realizable
value (see Note 8 for additional information). The net
unamortized purchased computer software included in other
intangible assets at September 30, 2006 and 2005 were
$1.6 million and $5.2 million, respectively.
Capitalized Patent Defense Costs: The Company
monitors the anticipated outcome of legal actions, and if it
determines that the success of the defense of a patent is
probable, and so long as the Company believes that the future
economic benefit of the patent will be increased, the Company
capitalizes external legal costs incurred in the defense of
these patents, up to the level of the expected increased future
economic benefit. If changes in the anticipated outcome occur,
the Company writes off any capitalized costs in the period the
change is determined. As of September 30, 2006 and 2005,
capitalized patent defense costs totaled $6.4 million and
$2.3 million, respectively.
Advertising Costs: Advertising costs are
expensed as incurred and are classified as sales and marketing
expenses. Cooperative advertising programs reimburse customers
for marketing activities for certain of the Companys
products, subject to defined criteria. Cooperative advertising
obligations are accrued and the costs expensed at the same time
the related revenue is recognized. Cooperative advertising
expenses are recorded as expense to the extent that an
advertising benefit separate from the revenue transaction can be
identified and the cash paid does not exceed the fair value of
that advertising benefit received. Any excess of cash paid over
the fair value of the advertising benefit received is recorded
as a reduction in revenue. The Company incurred advertising
costs of $16.4 million, $11.4 million and
$7.4 million for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Income Taxes: Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the
differences are expected to reverse. The Company does not
provide for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings
of its foreign subsidiaries, which the Company considers to be
indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion 23, Accounting for Income Taxes
Special Areas.
61
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company makes judgments regarding the realizability of its
deferred tax assets. In accordance with SFAS 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, the carrying value of
the net deferred tax assets is based on the belief that it is
more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient
future taxable income to realize these deferred tax assets after
consideration of all available evidence. The Company regularly
reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability considering
historical profitability, projected future taxable income, and
the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary
differences and tax planning strategies.
Valuation allowances have been established for
U.S. deferred tax assets, which the Company believes do not
meet the more likely than not criteria established
by SFAS 109. If the Company is subsequently able to utilize
all or a portion of the deferred tax assets for which a
valuation allowance has been established, then the Company may
be required to recognize these deferred tax assets through the
reduction of the valuation allowance which would result in a
material benefit to its results of operations in the period in
which the benefit is determined, excluding the recognition of
the portion of the valuation allowance which relates to net
deferred tax assets acquired in a business combination and
created as a result of share-based payments. The recognition of
the portion of the valuation allowance which relates to net
deferred tax assets resulting from share-based payments will be
recorded as additional
paid-in-capital;
the recognition of the portion of the valuation allowance which
relates to net deferred tax assets acquired in a business
combination will reduce goodwill, other intangible assets, and
to the extent remaining, the provision for income taxes.
Comprehensive Income (Loss): Total
comprehensive loss, net of taxes, was approximately
$19.1 million, $6.7 million and $9.5 million for
fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Comprehensive loss
consists of net loss and other comprehensive income (loss),
which includes current period foreign currency translation
adjustments, unrealized gains (losses) related to derivatives
reported as cash flow hedges, and unrealized gains (losses) on
marketable securities. For the purposes of comprehensive income
(loss) disclosures, the Company does not record tax provisions
or benefits for the net changes in the foreign currency
translation adjustment, as the Company intends to reinvest
undistributed earnings in its foreign subsidiaries permanently.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),
reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss), consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow
hedge derivatives
|
|
$
|
(570
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on marketable
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
Cumulative foreign currency
translation adjustments
|
|
|
2,226
|
|
|
|
(2,058
|
)
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,656
|
|
|
$
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
$
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentration of Risk: Financial instruments
that potentially subject the Company to significant
concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash, cash
equivalents, and trade accounts receivable. The Company places
its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions with
high credit ratings. The Company performs credit evaluations of
its customers financial condition and does not require
collateral, since management does not anticipate nonperformance
of payment. The Company also maintains reserves for potential
credit losses and such losses have been within managements
expectations. At September 30, 2006 and 2005, no customer
represented greater than 10% of the Companys net accounts
receivable balance.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Financial
instruments include cash equivalents, marketable securities,
accounts receivable, long-term debt and cash flow hedge
derivative instruments and are carried in the financial
statements at amounts that approximate their fair value.
Foreign Currency Translation: The Company
transacts business in various foreign currencies. In general,
the functional currency of a foreign operation is the local
countrys currency. Non-functional currency monetary
balances are remeasured into the functional currency of the
subsidiary with any related gain or loss recorded in other
income (expense), net, in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. Assets and liabilities of
62
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
operations outside the United States, for which the functional
currency is the local currency, are translated into United
States dollars using period-end exchange rates. Revenue and
expenses are translated at the average exchange rates in effect
during each fiscal month during the year. The effects of foreign
currency translation adjustments are included as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Financial Instruments and Hedging
Activities: The Company follows the requirements
of SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments. To achieve hedge
accounting, the criteria specified in SFAS 133, must be
met, including (i) ensuring at the inception of the hedge
that formal documentation exists for both the hedging
relationship and the entitys risk management objective and
strategy for undertaking the hedge and (ii) at the
inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, the hedging
relationship is expected to be highly effective in achieving
offsetting changes in fair value attributed to the hedged risk
during the period that the hedge is designated. Further, an
assessment of effectiveness is required whenever financial
statements or earnings are reported. Absent meeting these
criteria, changes in fair value are recognized currently in
other expense, net of tax, in the income statement. Once the
underlying forecasted transaction is realized, the gain or loss
from the derivative designated as a hedge of the transaction is
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to the
income statement, in the related revenue or expense caption, as
appropriate. Any ineffective portion of the derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges is recognized in current
earnings. As of September 30, 2006, there was a
$100 million interest rate swap (the Swap)
outstanding. The Swap was entered into in conjunction with the
term loan on March 31, 2006. The Swap was designated as a
cash flow hedge, and changes in the fair value of this cash flow
hedge derivative are recorded in stockholders equity as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Accounting for Long-Term Facility
Obligations: The Company has historically
acquired companies who have previously established restructuring
charges relating to lease exit costs, and has recorded
restructuring charges of its own that include lease exit costs.
The Company follows the provisions of
EITF 95-3
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination or SFAS 146 Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, as
applicable. In accounting for these obligations, the Company is
required to make assumptions relating to the time period over
which the facility will remain vacant, sublease terms, sublease
rates and discount rates. The Company bases its estimates and
assumptions on the best information available at the time of the
obligation having arisen. These estimates are reviewed and
revised as facts and circumstances dictate. Changes in these
estimates could have a material effect on the amount accrued on
the balance sheet.
Accounting for Share-Based Payments: Effective
October 1, 2005, the Company accounts for share-based
payments in accordance with SFAS 123(R), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R). Under the fair value
recognition provisions of this statement, share-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the
value of the award and is recognized as expense over the
requisite service period which is generally the vesting period.
Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant
date requires judgment, including estimating expected dividends,
share price volatility and the amount of share-based awards that
are expected to be forfeited. If actual results differ
significantly from these estimates, share-based compensation
expense and our results of operations could be materially
impacted. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company
applied Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, to account for its share-based payments. See
Note 16 for additional information related to share-based
payments.
SFAS 123R requires the presentation of pro forma
information for the comparative periods prior to the adoption,
as if the Company had accounted for all its employee share-based
payments under the fair value method of the original
SFAS 123. No amounts relating to the share-based payments
have been capitalized. The following
63
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income (loss) and
earnings per share (in thousands, except per-share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported
|
|
$
|
(5,417
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,378
|
)
|
Add: employee stock-based
compensation included in reported net income
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
Less: employee stock-based
compensation under SFAS 123
|
|
|
(9,056
|
)
|
|
|
(9,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss, pro forma
|
|
$
|
(11,477
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted, as reported
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted, pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the stock options granted was estimated on the
dates of grant using the Black-Scholes model with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
54.1
|
%
|
|
|
75.7
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that the Company
has never paid cash dividends and has no present intention to
pay cash dividends. Expected volatility is based on the
historical volatility of the Companys common stock over
the period commensurate with the expected life of the options
and the historical implied volatility from traded options with a
term of 180 days or greater. The risk-free interest rate is
derived from the average U.S. Treasury STRIPS rate during
the period, which approximates the rate in effect at the time of
grant, commensurate with the expected life of the instrument.
During fiscal 2005 and 2004, the Company estimated the expected
life based on the historical exercise behavior.
Net Income (Loss) Per Share: The Company
computes net income (loss) per share under the provisions of
SFAS 128, Earnings per Share, and EITF
03-06,
Participating Securities and Two
Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128,
Earnings per Share. Accordingly, basic net
income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income
(loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss) available to common stockholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the
period plus the dilutive effect of common equivalent shares,
which include outstanding stock options, warrants, unvested
shares of restricted stock using the treasury stock method and
the convertible debenture using the as converted method. Common
equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of diluted
net income (loss) per share if their effect is anti-dilutive.
Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares aggregating
19,250,475 for fiscal 2006, 13,133,936 for fiscal 2005 and
12,807,361 for fiscal 2004, have been excluded from the
computation of diluted net income (loss) per share because their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards: In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB
Statements 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)
(SFAS 158). SFAS 158 requires an employer
to recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined
benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as
an asset or liability in its
64
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that
funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
comprehensive income. SFAS 158 also requires the
measurement of defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of
the date of the employers fiscal year-end statement of
financial position (with limited exceptions). Under
SFAS 158, the Company will be required to recognize the
funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plan and to
provide the required disclosures commencing as of
September 30, 2007. The requirement to measure plan assets
and benefit obligations as of the date of the employers
fiscal year-end is effective for the Companys fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact that SFAS 158 will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) issued SAB 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements. This SAB provides guidance on the
consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in
quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a
materiality assessment. SAB 108 establishes an approach
that requires quantification of financial statement errors based
on the effects of each of the companys financial
statements and the related financial statement disclosures.
SAB 108 permits existing public companies to record the
cumulative effect of initially applying this approach in the
first year ending after November 15, 2006 by recording the
necessary correcting adjustments to the carrying values of
assets and liabilities as of the beginning of that year with the
offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of
retained earnings. Additionally, the use of the cumulative
effect transition method requires detailed disclosure of the
nature and amount of each individual error being corrected
through the cumulative adjustment and how and when it arose. The
Company does not anticipate that SAB 108 will have a
material impact on its financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a companys financial statements in
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes the recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for
the Companys fiscal year beginning October 1, 2007.
The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption
of FIN 48 will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2006, the FASB issued EITF
06-03,
How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to
Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income
Statement (That is, Gross versus Net Presentation) that
clarifies how a company discloses its recording of taxes
collected that are imposed on revenue-producing activities. EITF
06-03 is
effective for the first interim reporting period beginning after
December 15, 2006, and thus the Company is required to
adopt this standard as of January 1, 2007, in the second
quarter of its fiscal year 2007. The Company is evaluating the
impact, if any, that EITF
06-03 may
have on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments,
which amends SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities and SFAS 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS 155
simplifies the accounting for certain derivatives embedded in
other financial instruments by allowing them to be accounted for
as a whole if the holder elects to account for the whole
instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS 155 also clarifies
and amends certain other provisions of SFAS 133 and
SFAS 140. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial
instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement event
occurring in fiscal years beginning after September 15,
2006 and is therefore required to be adopted by the Company as
of October 1, 2006. The Company does not anticipate the
adoption of SFAS 155 will have any impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces APB 20,
Accounting Changes, and SFAS 3, Reporting
Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements
An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28. SFAS 154
provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of
accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes
retrospective application, or the latest practicable date, as
65
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the required method for reporting a change in accounting
principle and the reporting of a correction of an error.
SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005 and is therefore required to be adopted
by the Company as of October 1, 2006. To the extent the
Company makes any accounting changes or error correction in
future periods, the adoption of SFAS 154 could have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Acquisition
of Dictaphone Corporation (Dictaphone)
On March 31, 2006, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of Dictaphone Corporation
(Dictaphone), a leading healthcare information
technology company, for approximately $365.0 million in
cash, including approximately $5.7 million in estimated
transaction costs. The Company acquired Dictaphone to expand its
product portfolio, market reach and revenue streams in the
healthcare markets. The acquisition has been accounted for under
the purchase method of accounting, and the results of operations
of the acquired business have been included in the consolidated
financial statements of the Company since the date of
acquisition. The Company is currently finalizing the valuation
of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed; therefore, the
fair values set forth below are subject to adjustment as
additional information is obtained. The following table
summarizes the preliminary allocation of the purchase price (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
359,240
|
|
Estimated transaction costs
|
|
|
5,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
364,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary allocation of the
purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
7,742
|
|
Accounts receivables, net
|
|
|
32,060
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts
receivable
|
|
|
46,855
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4,358
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
13,899
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,587
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
155,760
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
239,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
507,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
(31,804
|
)
|
Accrued business combination costs
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(43,731
|
)
|
Unearned revenue and customer
deposits
|
|
|
(42,275
|
)
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
(13,161
|
)
|
Pension, postretirement and other
liabilities
|
|
|
(8,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(142,419
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
364,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with
EITF 95-3,
the Company has commenced integration activities which on a
preliminary basis have resulted in recognizing $1.8 in
liabilities for employee termination benefits which will be paid
through
66
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
fiscal 2007 and $0.9 million for the remaining contractual
obligations associated with the elimination of duplicate
facilities.
The Company is also committed to pay $1.2 million in
severance and related one-time payments to former employees of
Dictaphone so long as they remain with the Company through
specified dates in fiscal 2007. These $1.2 million in
payments are not accrued as of September 30, 2006, as they
relate to future performance obligations of these employees.
Approximately $26.0 million of the $239.2 million of
goodwill will be deductible for income tax purposes. Customer
relationships are amortized based upon patterns in which the
economic benefits of customer relationships are expected to be
utilized. Other finite-lived identifiable intangible assets are
amortized on a straight-line basis. The following are the
identifiable intangible assets acquired and their respective
weighted average lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
105,800
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Existing technology
|
|
|
21,500
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Trade name, subject to amortization
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
127,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name, indefinite life
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
155,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Nuance Communications, Inc. (Former
Nuance)
On September 15, 2005, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of Former Nuance, a Company that
provides software that enables enterprises and
telecommunications carriers to automate the delivery of
information and services over the telephone, for approximately
$224.4 million. With the acquisition of Former Nuance, the
Company enhanced its portfolio of technologies, applications and
services for call center automation, customer self service and
directory assistance.
67
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The total purchase price included the issuance of
28,760,031 shares of common stock valued at
$117.9 million, cash consideration of $82.2 million,
assumed stock options valued at $14.7 million, and
transaction costs of $9.6 million. The merger is a
non-taxable event and has been accounted for under the purchase
method of accounting. The results of operations of the acquired
business have been included in the financial statements of the
Company since the date of acquisition. The following table
summarizes the final allocation of the purchase price (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
117,916
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
82,172
|
|
Value of options to purchase
common stock assumed
|
|
|
14,721
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
9,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
224,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase
consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
58,066
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
20,362
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
12,065
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
14,848
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
41,740
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
146,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
296,670
|
|
Deferred compensation for stock
options assumed
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
(5,981
|
)
|
Current portion of accrued
facility leases
|
|
|
(12,699
|
)
|
Accrued acquisition-related fees
|
|
|
(7,083
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(8,400
|
)
|
Long-term facility leases, net of
current portion
|
|
|
(42,057
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(76,508
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
224,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of Former Nuance, the Company
conducted integration activities which resulted in recognizing
liabilities of $1.4 million for lease obligations, and
$2.6 million relating to employee termination benefits
employee and other contractual obligations. The Company has also
assumed obligations relating to a leased facility with lease
term set to expire in 2012 which was abandoned by Former Nuance
prior to the acquisition date. The fair value of the
obligations, net of estimated sublease income, totaling
$53.4 million was recognized as assumed liability at date
of acquisition. The payment of the lease obligations is
discussed in Note 12. Substantially all of the
employee-related costs were paid as of September 30, 2006.
68
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Customer relationships are amortized based upon patterns in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are
expected to be utilized. Other finite-lived identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. The
following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and
their respective weighted average lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Core technology
|
|
$
|
17,880
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
2,230
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
19,430
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of MedRemote, Inc. (MedRemote)
On May 12, 2005, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of MedRemote, a Company that provides
Web-based transcription processing and workflow systems that
leverage speech recognition and integrate with existing
healthcare information systems, for approximately
$13.7 million. The purchase price consisted of
$7.2 million in cash including transaction costs, and
1,544,309 shares of common stock valued at
$6.5 million. The merger is a non-taxable event and has
been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The
results of operations of the acquired business have been
included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company
since the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes
the final allocation of the purchase price (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
6,500
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
6,569
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
13,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase
consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
2,301
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
67
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
9,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
14,230
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
13,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Customer relationships are amortized based upon patterns in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are
expected to be utilized. Other finite-lived identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. The
following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and
their respective weighted average lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
$
|
1,090
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Phonetic Systems Ltd. (Phonetic)
On February 1, 2005, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of Phonetic, an Israeli corporation
which develops and markets an automatic telephone information
system. Phonetic provided the Company with an array of
technology, customer, partner and employee resources to help
fuel its growth and accelerate its deployment of high quality
speech applications throughout the world.
The total purchase price of approximately $36.1 million
included an initial payment of $17.5 million paid at
closing, a deferred payment of $17.5 million due in
February 2007, cash paid out related to the proceeds from the
employees issuance of stock options totaling $0.4 million,
transaction costs of $2.5 million, and the fair value of
warrants issued for the purchase of up to 750,000 shares of
the Companys common stock. The present value of the
deferred payment of $17.5 million is included in current
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and is being
accreted to the stated amount through the payment date. The
merger was a taxable event and has been accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting. The results of operations of the
acquired business have been included in the consolidated
financial statements of the Company since the date of
acquisition. The following table summarizes the final allocation
of the purchase price (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, including deferred payment
obligation at net present value
|
|
$
|
33,293
|
|
Warrants issued at fair value
|
|
|
370
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
36,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase
consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
1,904
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
70
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
6,570
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
35,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
45,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(7,699
|
)
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(1,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(9,193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
36,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Under the agreement, the Company agreed to make maximum
additional payments of $35.0 million in contingent purchase
price upon achievement of certain established financial targets
through December 31, 2007. On June 1, 2006, the
Company notified the former shareholders of Phonetic that the
performance targets for the first schedule payment of up to
$12.0 million were not achieved. The former shareholders of
Phonetic have objected to this determination. The Company and
the former shareholders of Phonetic are in the early stages of
discussing this matter. Additional payments, if any, related to
this contingency will be accounted for as additional goodwill.
In connection with the acquisition of Phonetic, the Company
closed a facility in Israel and recognized $0.7 million in
liabilities at the date of acquisition for the remaining
contractual obligations associated with the closed facility in
accordance with
EITF 95-3.
Customer relationships are amortized based upon patterns in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are
expected to be utilized. Other finite-lived identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. The
following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and
their respective weighted average lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
$
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
3,950
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of ART Advanced Recognition Technologies, Inc.
(ART)
On January 21, 2005, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of ART, a company which designs,
develops and sells speech and handwriting recognition software
products. With the acquisition of ART, the Company expanded its
portfolio of embedded speech solutions to include a deep set of
resources, expertise and relationships with the worlds
leading mobile device manufacturers and service providers. ART
specializes in applications that create voice-based,
conversational interfaces that enable users to dial by voice and
manage and access their contacts for mobile devices.
71
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The total purchase price of approximately $27.7 million
consisted of first cash installment payment of
$10.0 million paid at closing, a deferred payment of
$16.4 million to be paid in December 2005 plus interest of
4%, and $1.3 million of transaction costs. During fiscal
2006, the Company paid $14.4 million of the deferred
payment. As of September 30, 2006, the Company still had an
outstanding purchase price payment of $2.0 million which
represents proceeds withheld by the Company to satisfy claims
against the former ART shareholders under the purchase
agreement. Subsequent to September 30, 2006, the Company
agreed to pay the former ART shareholders $1.0 million and
retained the remaining amount in full satisfaction of the claims
made against the former ART shareholders and will be used by the
Company, if necessary, to satisfy the liabilities that formed
the basis of the claims against the former ART shareholders. The
merger was a taxable event and has been accounted under the
purchase method of accounting. The results of operations of the
acquired business have been included in the consolidated
financial statements of the Company since the date of
acquisition. The following table summarizes the final allocation
of the purchase price (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
26,414
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
27,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase
consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
5,546
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
769
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
486
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
9,380
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
19,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
35,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(3,234
|
)
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(4,291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(7,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
27,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships are amortized based upon patterns in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are
expected to be utilized. Other finite-lived identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. The
following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and
their respective weighted average lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
$
|
5,150
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
4,210
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Rhetorical Systems, Ltd.
(Rhetorical)
On December 6, 2004, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of Rhetorical, a supplier of
innovative
text-to-speech
solutions and tools based in Edinburgh, Scotland. With the
acquisition of Rhetorical, the
72
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company solidified its position as a leading provider of speech
synthesis or
text-to-speech
solutions for a variety of speech-based applications. The
Rhetorical acquisition further differentiates the Companys
solutions with a number of techniques, tools, and services that
enhance the ability to deliver custom, dynamic voices.
The consideration consisted of 2.8 million Pounds Sterling
in cash (valued at $5.4 million using foreign exchange
rates as of the date of the acquisition) and 449,437 shares
of the Companys common stock valued at $1.7 million.
The acquisition is a taxable event and has been accounted for
under the purchase method of accounting. The results of
operations of the acquired business have been included in the
consolidated financial statements of the Company since the date
of acquisition. The following table summarizes the final
allocation of the purchase price (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
5,360
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
8,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase
consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
153
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
9,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
11,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(2,518
|
)
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(3,464
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
8,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of Rhetorical, the Company
closed a facility in Edinburgh, Scotland and recognized
$1.3 million in liabilities at date of acquisition for the
remaining contractual obligations associated with the closed
facility in accordance with
EITF 95-3.
Customer relationships are amortized based upon patterns in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are
expected to be utilized. Other finite-lived identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. The
following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and
their respective weighted average lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
$
|
490
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Customer relationships
Maintenance
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Customer relationships
License and Professional Services
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Acquisition
of Brand & Groeber Communications GbR
(B&G)
On September 16, 2004, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of B&G, to expand its intellectual
property portfolio relating to embedded speech synthesis
technology. B&Gs embedded speech application makes
mobile phones accessible to the visually impaired. Many of the
applications standard features, like email reading, have
broad applicability for all types of users where
eyes-free use of mobile devices is important, like
in the automobile. The total purchase price of approximately
$0.6 million consisted of cash consideration of
$0.5 million and transaction costs of $0.1 million.
Under the agreement, the Company agreed to make maximum
additional payments of up to 5.5 million upon
achievement of certain established financial targets. From the
date of acquisition through December 31, 2005,
0.4 million was paid based on the attainment of
certain performance targets. The remaining
5.1 million (approximately $6.5 million based on
the currency exchange rates as of September 30,
2006) may be earned based on the attainment of performance
targets for calendar 2006 and, to the extent earned, would be
paid in January 2007. Any additional payments related to this
contingency will be accounted for as additional goodwill. The
acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting and was taxable to the shareholders. The results of
operations of the acquired business have been included in the
financial statements of the Company since the date of
acquisition.
Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized
on a straight-line basis. The following are the identifiable
intangible assets acquired and their respective weighted average
lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Trade names and trademarks
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Telelogue, Inc. (Telelogue)
On June 15, 2004, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of Telelogue, a provider of automated
directory assistance applications for telecommunications
providers, based in New Jersey. The acquisition of Telelogue
enhanced the Companys automated directory assistance
portfolio by adding key customer and partner relationships,
methodologies in voice user interface, and several patents used
in the successful automation of directory automation services.
74
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The total purchase price of approximately $3.3 million
included cash consideration equal to $2.2 million,
transaction costs of $0.8 million and the assumption of
certain obligations of $0.3 million. The merger was a
taxable event and had been accounted for under the purchase
method of accounting. An additional amount of $2.0 million
in contingent consideration was not earned during the period
defined in the purchase agreement, and will not become payable.
The results of operations of the acquired business have been
included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company
since the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes
the final allocation of the purchase price (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
2,206
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
297
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
3,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase
consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
637
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
550
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
3,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized
on a straight-line basis. The following are the identifiable
intangible assets acquired and their respective weighted average
lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Core technology
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Trade names and trademarks
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company accounts for its marketable equity securities in
accordance with SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Investments are
classified as
available-for-sale
and are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with
unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (losses), net of tax.
Realized gains and losses on sales of short-term and long-term
investments have not been material. Marketable securities have
been classified as
available-for-sale
securities as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance at September 30,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies
|
|
$
|
7,333
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
7,336
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
16,836
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
16,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term marketable
securities
|
|
$
|
24,169
|
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006, the Company did not have any
outstanding marketable securities.
Accounts receivable, excluding acquired unbilled accounts
receivable, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
116,574
|
|
|
$
|
62,212
|
|
Unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
12,405
|
|
|
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,979
|
|
|
|
79,606
|
|
Less allowance for
doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
(2,995
|
)
|
Less reserve for
distribution and reseller accounts receivable
|
|
|
(9,797
|
)
|
|
|
(5,798
|
)
|
Less allowance for
sales returns
|
|
|
(6,304
|
)
|
|
|
(4,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,778
|
|
|
$
|
66,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled accounts receivable primarily relate to product revenue
earned under royalty-based arrangements for which billing occurs
in the month following receipt of the royalty report, and for
professional services revenue earned under percentage of
completion contracts that have not yet been billed based on the
terms of the specific arrangement.
76
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Activities in the allowance for doubtful accounts and other
sales reserves were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Distribution and
|
|
|
Allowances for
|
|
|
|
Doubtful accounts
|
|
|
Reseller
|
|
|
Sales Returns
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
1,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,891
|
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
Additions charged to costs and
expenses
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions (additions) made to
revenue, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2004
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
|
|
2,926
|
|
Additions charged to costs and
expenses
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions (additions) made to
revenue, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
|
|
5,798
|
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
Additions charged to costs and
expenses
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(2,302
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions (additions) made to
revenue, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,999
|
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
9,797
|
|
|
$
|
6,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts receivable consist of amounts
established under the provisions of EITF
01-3 and
relate to future expected billings of certain non-cancelable
contracts which have been assumed by the Company in connection
with its accounting for acquisitions. To the extent that the
products or services deliverable under these contracts were not
delivered as of the date of the acquisition, and therefore
represent an assumed legal performance obligation by the
Company. An asset is recorded for payments due from customers,
and a related liability for the fair value of undelivered
services is included in unearned revenue and customer deposits
relating to such future recognizable revenue. As of
September 30, 2006 and 2005, the acquired unbilled accounts
receivable were approximately $19.7 million and
$3.1 million, respectively. The increase is attributable to
the acquisition of Dictaphone in March 2006 (Note 3).
6. Inventories,
net
Inventories, net of allowances, consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Components and parts
|
|
$
|
3,249
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Inventory at customers
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,795
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory at customers reflects equipment related to in-process
installations of solutions of Dictaphone contracts with
customers. These contracts have not been recorded to revenue as
of September 30. 2006, and therefore the inventory is on
the balance sheet until such time as the contract is recorded to
revenue and the inventory will be expensed to cost of sales.
77
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Land,
Building and Equipment, Net
|
Land, building and equipment, net at September 30, 2006 and
2005 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Building
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery & equipment
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computers, software and equipment
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
30,613
|
|
|
|
21,850
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
2-10
|
|
|
|
7,076
|
|
|
|
4,932
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5,217
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
Construction in process
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,854
|
|
|
|
31,244
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,154
|
)
|
|
|
(16,911
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,700
|
|
|
$
|
14,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense, associated with building and equipment,
for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $8.4 million,
$5.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively.
Construction in progress is related to the capitalization of
internal costs associated with various projects relating to
financial systems. The projects are expected to cost an
additional approximately $3.3 million to complete, and will
be placed into service in fiscal 2007.
|
|
8.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal years
2006 and 2005, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30,
2004
|
|
$
|
246,424
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
218,119
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(4,720
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency
translation
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30,
2005
|
|
|
458,313
|
|
Goodwill acquired
Dictaphone acquisition
|
|
|
239,174
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(2,547
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency
translation
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30,
2006
|
|
$
|
699,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill adjustments during fiscal 2006 primarily included
$7.9 million of the utilization of acquired deferred tax
assets in connection with the acquisition of SpeechWorks, Inc.
in 2003 and Former Nuance in 2005 as well as $0.8 million
final purchase price allocations in connection with various
acquisitions during fiscal 2005. These adjustments were
partially offset by the inclusion of an additional
$5.8 million of pre-acquisition contingencies due to
minimum committed royalties in connection with the acquisitions
of ART and Phonetic, and $0.3 million of additional
transaction costs.
Goodwill adjustments during fiscal 2005 primarily included
$2.8 million and $1.8 million of the utilization of
acquired deferred tax assets in connection with the acquisition
of Speechworks, Inc. in 2003 and Caere Corporation in 2000,
respectively and $0.1 million related to final purchase
price allocations in connection with the acquisitions made
during fiscal 2004.
78
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
147,814
|
|
|
$
|
20,721
|
|
|
$
|
127,093
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
91,033
|
|
|
|
30,897
|
|
|
|
60,136
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Tradenames and trademarks, subject
to amortization
|
|
|
8,750
|
|
|
|
4,092
|
|
|
|
4,658
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Non-competition agreement
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
248,185
|
|
|
|
55,945
|
|
|
|
192,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename, indefinite life
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
275,985
|
|
|
$
|
55,945
|
|
|
$
|
220,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
41,567
|
|
|
$
|
5,701
|
|
|
$
|
35,866
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
67,832
|
|
|
|
16,771
|
|
|
|
51,061
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
Tradenames and trademarks
|
|
|
8,090
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
|
|
4,958
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Non-competition agreement
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
118,046
|
|
|
$
|
25,696
|
|
|
$
|
92,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement
with a counter party that grants an exclusive license to the
Company to resell the counter partys productivity
application. The Company capitalized $11.4 million as
completed technology and has amortized the amount to cost of
revenue on a straight-line basis over the period of expected use
of five years. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, the
Company determined it would not make additional investments to
support this technology. As a result, the Company revised its
cash flow estimates related to the acquired technology and
recorded an additional $2.6 million in cost of revenue to
write down the purchased technology to its net realizable value
at September 30, 2006. Total net book value of the asset
was $0.5 million and $5.2 million as of
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Amortization expense for the acquired patents, core and
completed technology are included in the cost of revenue from
amortization of intangible assets in the accompanying Statements
of Operations amounted to $12.9 million, $9.2 million
and $8.4 million in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Amortization expense included in operating
expenses was $17.2 million, $4.0 million and
$2.0 million in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004,
79
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the
five succeeding years as of September 30, 2006, is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
11,217
|
|
|
$
|
20,369
|
|
|
$
|
31,586
|
|
2008
|
|
|
10,565
|
|
|
|
18,922
|
|
|
|
29,487
|
|
2009
|
|
|
9,745
|
|
|
|
17,045
|
|
|
|
26,790
|
|
2010
|
|
|
8,960
|
|
|
|
14,832
|
|
|
|
23,792
|
|
2011
|
|
|
8,542
|
|
|
|
13,639
|
|
|
|
22,181
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
11,107
|
|
|
|
47,297
|
|
|
|
58,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
60,136
|
|
|
$
|
132,104
|
|
|
$
|
192,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
$
|
21,310
|
|
|
$
|
13,911
|
|
Accrued sales and marketing
incentives
|
|
|
4,454
|
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
Accrued restructuring and other
charges
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
|
|
6,169
|
|
Accrued acquisition costs and
liabilities
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
18,233
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
3,857
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
17,579
|
|
|
|
11,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,674
|
|
|
$
|
60,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued acquisition costs and liabilities at September 30,
3006 primarily related to the acquisition of Dictaphone on
March 31, 2006. Accrued acquisition costs and liabilities
at September 30, 2005 included $12.0 million for costs
to consummate the acquisition of Former Nuance and
$6.2 million payable to shareholders of Former Nuance.
At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had the
following borrowing obligations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006 Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
353,225
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2003 0% Convertible Debenture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,524
|
|
2002 Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,943
|
|
|
|
27,746
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
3,953
|
|
|
|
27,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
349,990
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2006
Credit Facility
On March 31, 2006 the Company entered into a new senior
secured credit facility (the 2006 Credit Facility).
The 2006 Credit Facility consists of a $355.0 million
7-year term
loan which matures on March 31, 2013 and a
$75.0 million revolving credit line which matures on
March 31, 2012. The available revolving credit line
capacity is reduced, as necessary, to account for certain
letters of credit outstanding. As of September 30, 2006,
there were $17.2 million of letters of credit issued under
the revolving credit line and there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line.
Borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facility bear interest at a
rate equal to the applicable margin plus, at the Companys
option, either (a) a base rate (which is the higher of the
corporate base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal
funds rate plus 0.50% per annum) or (b) a LIBOR rate
determined by reference to the British Bankers Association
Interest Settlement Rates for deposits in U.S. dollars. The
applicable margin for borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facility
ranges from 0.50% to 1.00% per annum with respect to base
rate borrowings and from 1.50% to 2.00% per annum with
respect to LIBOR-based borrowings, depending upon the
Companys leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2006,
the Companys applicable margin is 1.00% for base rate
borrowings and 2.00% for LIBOR-based borrowings. The Company is
required to pay a commitment fee for unutilized commitments
under the revolving credit facility at a rate ranging from
0.375% to 0.50% per annum, based upon our leverage ratio.
As of September 30, 2006, the commitment fee rate is 0.50%.
The Company capitalized approximately $9.0 million in debt
issuance costs related to the opening of the 2006 Credit
Facility. The costs associated with the revolving credit
facility are being amortized as interest expense over six years,
through March 2012, while the costs associated with the term
loan are being amortized as interest expense over seven years,
through March 2013, which are the maturity dates of the
revolving line and term facility, respectively under the 2006
Credit Facility. The effective interest method is used to
calculate the amortization of the debt issuance costs for both
the revolving credit facility and the term loan. These debt
issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of
$0.7 million, are included in other assets in the
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2006.
The $355.0 million term loan is subject to repayment
consisting of a baseline amortization of 1% per annum
($3.55 million per year, due in four equal quarterly
installments), and an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined
in the 2006 Credit Facility, which will be first payable
beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, based on the
excess cash flow generated in fiscal 2007. As of
September 30, 2006, we have repaid $1.8 million of
principal under the term loan agreement. Any borrowings not paid
through the baseline repayment, the excess cash flow sweep, or
any other mandatory or optional payments that the Company may
make, will be repaid upon maturity. If only the baseline
repayments are made, the aggregate annual maturities of the term
loan would be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
335,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
353,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys obligations under the 2006 Credit Facility
are unconditionally guaranteed by, subject to certain
exceptions, each of its existing and future direct and indirect
wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The 2006 Credit Facility and
the guarantees thereof are secured by first priority liens and
security interests in the following: 100% of the capital stock
of substantially all of the Companys domestic subsidiaries
and 65% of the outstanding voting equity interests and 100% of
the non-voting equity interests of first-tier foreign
subsidiaries, material
81
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
tangible and intangible assets, and present and future
intercompany debt. The 2006 Credit Facility also contains
provisions for mandatory prepayments of outstanding term loans,
subject to certain exceptions, with: 100% of net cash proceeds
of asset sales, 100% of net cash proceeds of issuance or
incurrence of debt, and 100% of extraordinary receipts. The
Company may voluntarily prepay the 2006 Credit Facility without
premium or penalty other than customary breakage
costs with respect to LIBOR-based loans.
The 2006 Credit Facility agreement contains a number of
covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain
exceptions, the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to:
incur additional indebtedness, create liens on assets, enter
into certain sale and lease-back transactions, make investments,
make certain acquisitions, sell assets, engage in mergers or
consolidations, pay dividends and distributions or repurchase
the Companys capital stock, engage in certain transactions
with affiliates, change the business conducted by the Company
and its subsidiaries, amend certain charter documents and
material agreements governing subordinated indebtedness, prepay
other indebtedness, enter into agreements that restrict
dividends from subsidiaries and enter into certain derivatives
transactions. The 2006 Credit Facility is governed by financial
covenants that include, but are not limited to, maximum total
leverage and minimum interest coverage ratios, as well as to a
maximum capital expenditures limitation. The 2006 Credit
Facility also contains certain customary affirmative covenants
and events of default. As of September 30, 2006, the
Company was in compliance with the covenants under the 2006
Credit Facility agreement.
2002
Credit Facility
The Company historically maintained a Loan and Security
Agreement (the 2002 Credit Facility) with Silicon
Valley Bank which was initiated on October 31, 2002, and
was amended several times, most recently in December 2005. The
agreement consisted of a $10.0 million revolving loan which
expired on March 31, 2006.
The Company was required to comply with both a minimum adjusted
quick ratio and a minimum tangible net worth calculation, as
defined in the agreement. Depending on the Companys
adjusted quick ratio, borrowings under the Credit Facility bore
interest at the prime rate plus up to 0.75%, (collectively 6.75%
at September 30, 2005). Borrowings under the 2002 Credit
Facility were collateralized by substantially all of the
Companys personal property, predominantly its accounts
receivable, but not its intellectual property. As of
September 30, 2005, no amounts were outstanding under the
Credit Facility and $6.1 million committed for outstanding
letters of credit.
2003
0% Convertible Debenture
On January 30, 2003, the Company issued a
$27.5 million three-year, zero-interest convertible
subordinated debenture due January 2006 to Royal Philips
Electronics Speech Processing Technology and Voice Control
business unit (Philips) as partial consideration for
certain assets the Company acquired from Philips. The
convertible note was convertible into shares of the
Companys common stock at $6.00 per share at any time
until maturity at Philips option. The convertible note
contained a provision that all amounts unpaid at maturity bear
interest at a rate of 3% per quarter until paid. On
January 30, 2006, Philips exercised its right to convert
the note into 4,587,334 shares of the Companys common
stock at the conversion price of $6.00 per share, in full
satisfaction of all amounts due.
|
|
11.
|
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
On March 31, 2006, the Company entered into a three-year
interest rate swap with a notional value of $100 million
(the Interest Rate Swap). The Interest Rate Swap was
entered into as a partial hedge of the 2006 Credit Facility,
discussed in Note 10, to effectively change the
characteristics of the interest rate without actually changing
the debt instrument. For floating rate debt, interest rate
changes generally do not affect the fair market value, but do
impact future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors
are held constant. At its inception, the Company formally
documented the hedging relationship and has determined that the
hedge is perfectly effective
82
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and designated it as a cash flow hedge of a portion of the 2006
Credit Facility as defined by SFAS 133. The Interest Rate
Swap will hedge the variability of the cash flows caused by
changes in U.S. dollar LIBOR interest rates. The swap is
marked to market at each reporting date. The fair value of the
Interest Rate Swap at September 30, 2006 was
$0.6 million which was included in other liabilities.
Changes in the fair value of the cash flow hedge derivative are
reported in stockholders equity as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
|
|
12.
|
Accrued
Business Combination Costs
|
In connection with the acquisitions of SpeechWorks
International, Inc. in August 2003 and Former Nuance in
September 2005, the Company has assumed obligations relating to
certain leased facilities expiring in 2016 and 2012,
respectively, and that were abandoned by the acquired companies
prior to the acquisition date. The fair value of the
obligations, net of estimated sublease income, are recognized as
liabilities assumed by the Company and accordingly are included
in the allocation of the purchase price, generally resulting in
an increase to the recorded amount of the goodwill. The net
payments have been discounted in calculating the fair value of
the obligation as of the date of acquisition, and the discount
is being accreted through expected maturity. As of
September 30, 2006, the total gross payments due from the
Company to the landlords of the facilities is
$88.9 million. This is reduced by $17.4 million of
sublease income and a $6.5 million present value discount.
The gross value of the lease exit costs will be paid out
approximately as follows: $12.4 million in fiscal 2007,
$12.8 million in fiscal 2008, $13.2 million in fiscal
2009, $13.6 million in fiscal 2010, $14.2 million in
fiscal 2011, and $22.8 million from fiscal 2012 through
fiscal 2016. These gross payment obligations are included in the
commitments disclosed in Note 17.
Additionally, the Company has implemented restructuring plans to
eliminate duplicate facilities, personnel or assets in
connection with the business combinations. In accordance with
EITF 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination, costs such as these are recognized
as liabilities assumed by the Company, and accordingly are
included in the allocation of the purchase price, generally
resulting in an increase to the recorded amount of the goodwill.
As of September 30, 2006, total gross payments due from the
Company to the landlords of the facilities is $3.4 million.
This is reduced by $1.1 million sublease income. The gross
value of the lease exit costs will be paid out approximately as
follows: $1.5 million in fiscal 2007, $1.0 million in
fiscal 2008 and $0.9 million in fiscal 2009. These gross
payment obligations are included in the commitments disclosed in
Note 17.
As noted in Note 3, in addition to the facilities accruals,
the Company has an obligation relating to certain incentive
compensation payments to former employees of the acquired
companies whose positions have been eliminated in connection
with the combinations. The remaining payments for these
obligations are expected to be made in fiscal 2007.
The components of these accrued business combination costs are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2004
|
|
$
|
14,948
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,948
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
56,189
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
59,712
|
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease
receipts
|
|
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
|
|
(2,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
69,863
|
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
71,999
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
2,523
|
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease
receipts
|
|
|
(13,776
|
)
|
|
|
(3,013
|
)
|
|
|
(16,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
59,221
|
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
$
|
60,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges, net
|
Fiscal
2006
In fiscal 2006, the Company recorded a recovery of
$1.2 million from restructuring and other charges. The
recovery consisted of $1.3 million reduction to existing
restructuring reserves as a result of a favorable sublease
agreement signed during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The
amount was offset by net adjustments of $0.1 million
associated with prior years restructuring programs.
Fiscal
2005
In fiscal 2005, the Company incurred restructuring charges of
$7.2 million. In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, a plan
of restructuring relating to the elimination of ten employees
was enacted. In June 2005, the Company initiated the process of
consolidating certain operations into its new corporate
headquarters facility in Burlington, Massachusetts. In addition,
at various times during the third fiscal quarter, the Company
committed to pursuing the closure and consolidation of certain
other domestic and international facilities. As a result of
these initiatives, the Company recorded restructuring charges in
its third fiscal quarter totaling approximately
$2.1 million. In September 2005, in connection with the
acquisition of Former Nuance, the Company committed to a plan of
restructuring of certain of its personnel and facilities. Under
this plan of restructuring, the Company accrued
$2.5 million relating to the elimination of approximately
40 personnel, mainly in research and development and sales and
marketing; additionally, certain of its facilities were selected
to be closed, resulting in an accrual of $2.0 million for
future committed facility lease payments, net of assumed
sublease income, and $0.2 in property and equipment were written
off. The restructuring charge taken in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2005 was related to only the Companys historic
personnel and facilities. Any personnel or facilities-related
restructuring activities in connection with the acquisition of
Former Nuance were accrued as assumed liabilities in purchase
accounting.
Fiscal
2004
During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company
recorded a charge of $0.8 million related to separation
agreements with two former members of its senior management team.
The following table sets forth the fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004
accrual activity relating to restructuring and other charges (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
1,552
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,861
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Non-cash write-off
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,599
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2004
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
7,223
|
|
Non-cash write-off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,548
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
4,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(1,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,233
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
(2,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,668
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
530
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The remaining personnel-related accrual as of September 30,
2006 is primarily comprised of amounts due under the
restructuring charge from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the
balance of which will be paid in fiscal 2007. The
personnel-related payments made in fiscal 2006 were primarily
related to the charges recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2005.
|
|
14.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
Cash
paid for Interest and Income Taxes:
During fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company made cash
payments for interest totaling $13.8 million,
$0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
During fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, total net cash paid (refunds)
for income taxes were $3.4 million, $(0.7) million and
$0.6 million, respectively.
Non
Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
In January, 2006, the Company issued 4,587,334 shares of
its common stock valued at $27.5 million upon conversion of
the $27.5 million convertible debenture.
In September 2005, the Company issued 28,760,031 shares of
its common stock valued at $117.9 million in connection
with the acquisition of Former Nuance. The Company also assumed
stock options valued at $14.7 million.
In June 2005, the Company issued 1,544,228 shares of its
common stock valued at $6.5 million in connection with the
acquisition of MedRemote.
In June 2005, in connection with the acquisition of Phonetic,
the Company issued warrants for the purchase of up to
750,000 shares of its common stock, these warrants were
valued at $0.4 million.
In December 2004, the Company issued 449,437 shares of its
common stock valued at $1.7 million in connection with the
acquisition of Rhetorical.
Preferred
Stock
The Company is authorized to issue up to 40,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. The Company
has designated 100,000 shares as Series A Preferred
Stock and 15,000,000 shares as Series B Preferred
Stock. In connection with the acquisition of ScanSoft from Xerox
Corporation (Xerox), the Company issued
3,562,238 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to Xerox.
On March 19, 2004, the Company announced that Warburg
Pincus, a global private equity firm, had agreed to purchase all
outstanding shares of the Companys stock held by Xerox
Corporation for approximately $80 million, including the
3,562,238 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. The
Series B Preferred stock is convertible into shares of
common stock on a
one-for-one
basis. The Series B Preferred Stock has a liquidation
preference of $1.30 per share plus all declared but unpaid
dividends. The holders of Series B Preferred Stock are
entitled to non-cumulative dividends at the rate of
$0.05 per annum per share, payable when, and if declared by
the Board of Directors. To date, no dividends have been declared
by the Board of Directors. Holders of Series B Preferred
Stock have no voting rights, except those rights provided under
Delaware law. The undesignated shares of preferred stock will
have rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including
voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption
privileges and liquidation preferences, as shall be determined
by the Board of Directors upon issuance of the preferred stock.
The Company has reserved 3,562,238 shares of its common
stock for issuance upon conversion of the Series B
Preferred Stock.
85
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Common
Stock
On May 5, 2005, the Company entered into a Securities
Purchase Agreement (the Securities Purchase
Agreement) by and among the Company, Warburg Pincus
Private Equity VIII, L.P. and certain of its affiliated entities
(collectively Warburg Pincus) pursuant to which
Warburg Pincus agreed to purchase, and the Company agreed to
sell, 3,537,736 shares of its common stock and warrants to
purchase 863,236 shares of its common stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $15.1 million. The warrants
have an exercise price of $5.00 per share and a term of
four years. On May 9, 2005, the sale of the shares and the
warrants pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement was
completed. The Company also entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement (the Stock Purchase Agreement) by and
among the Company and Warburg Pincus pursuant to which Warburg
Pincus agreed to purchase and the Company agreed to sell
14,150,943 shares of the Companys common stock and
warrants to purchase 3,177,570 shares of the Companys
common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$60.0 million. The warrants have an exercise price of
$5.00 per share and a term of four years. On
September 15, 2005, the sale of the shares and the warrants
pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement was completed. The
net proceeds from these two fiscal 2005 financings was
$73.9 million. In connection with the financings, the
Company granted Warburg Pincus registration rights giving
Warburg Pincus the right to request that the Company use
commercially reasonable efforts to register some or all of the
shares of common stock issued to Warburg Pincus under both the
Securities Purchase Agreement and Stock Purchase Agreement,
including shares of common stock underlying the warrants. The
Company has evaluated these warrants under EITF
00-19,
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock
and has determined that the warrants should be classified within
the stockholders equity section of the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet.
The Company has issued shares of its common stock in connection
with several of its acquisitions. See Note 3 and
Note 14 for further disclosure relating to these issuances.
Common
Stock Repurchases
As of September 30, 2006 and 2005 the Company had
repurchased a total of 3,030,183 and 2,846,861 shares,
respectively, under various repurchase programs, discussed
below. The Company intends to use the repurchased shares for its
employee stock plans and for potential future acquisitions.
During fiscal 2006 and 2005, the Company repurchased 183,322 and
75,354 shares of common stock at a cost of
$1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, to cover
employees tax obligations related to vesting of restricted
stock.
Common
Stock Warrants
In fiscal 2005 the Company issued several warrants for the
purchase of its common stock. Warrants were issued to Warburg
Pincus as described above. Additionally, on November 15,
2004, in connection with the acquisition of Phonetic
(Note 3), the Company issued unvested warrants to purchase
750,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of
$4.46 per share that will vest, if at all, upon the
achievement of certain performance targets. The initial
valuation of the warrants occurred upon closing of the Phonetic
acquisition, February 1, 2005, and was treated as purchase
consideration in accordance with
EITF 97-8,
Accounting for Contingent Consideration Issued in a
Purchase Business Combination.
In March 1999 the Company issued Xerox a ten-year warrant with
an exercise price for each warrant share of $0.61. This warrant
is exercisable for the purchase of 525,732 shares of the
Companys common stock. On March 19, 2004, the Company
announced that Warburg Pincus, a global private equity firm, had
agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of the Companys
stock held by Xerox Corporation, including this warrant, for
approximately $80 million. In connection with this
transaction, Warburg Pincus acquired new warrants to purchase
2.5 million additional shares of the Companys common
stock from the Company for total consideration of
$0.6 million. The warrants have a six-year life and an
exercise price of $4.94. The Company received this payment of
$0.6 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
86
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with the March 31, 2003 acquisition of the
certain intellectual property assets (Note 8), the Company
issued a warrant for the purchase of 78,000 shares of the
Companys common stock at an exercise price of
$8.10 per share. The warrant was immediately exercisable
and was valued at $0.1 million based upon the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected
volatility of 80%, a risk-free rate of 1.87%, an expected term
of 2.5 years, no dividends and a stock price of $4.57 based
on the Companys stock price at the time of issuance. This
warrant expired unexercised on October 31, 2005.
In connection with the acquisition of SpeechWorks in 2003, the
Company issued a warrant to its investment banker, expiring on
August 11, 2009, for the purchase of 150,000 shares of
the Companys common stock at an exercise price of
$3.98 per share. The warrant became exercisable
August 11, 2005, and was valued at its issuance at
$0.2 million based upon the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of
60%, a risk-free interest rate of 4.03%, an expected term of
8 years, no dividends and a stock price of $3.92, based on
the Companys stock price at the time of issuance.
Also in connection with the acquisition of SpeechWorks, the
Company assumed outstanding warrants previously issued by
SpeechWorks to America Online. These warrants allow for the
purchase of up to 219,421 shares of the Companys
common stock, and were issued in connection with a long-term
marketing arrangement. The warrant is currently exercisable at a
price of $14.49 per share and expires on June 30,
2007. The value of the warrant was insignificant.
Based on its review of EITF
00-19, the
Company has determined that each of the above-noted warrants
should be classified within the stockholders equity
section of the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123R)
effective October 1, 2005. The Company has several equity
instruments that are required to be evaluated under
SFAS 123R, including: stock option plans, an employee stock
purchase plan, awards in the form of restricted shares
(Restricted Stock) and awards in the form of units
of stock purchase rights (Restricted Units). The
Restricted Stock and Restricted Units are collectively referred
to as Restricted Awards. SFAS 123R requires the
recognition of the fair value of share-based payments as a
charge against earnings. The Company recognizes share-based
payment expense over the requisite service period of the
individual grantees, which generally equals the vesting period.
Based on the provisions of SFAS 123R the Companys
share-based payments awards are accounted for as equity
instruments. Prior to October 1, 2005, the Company followed
APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for
share-based payment. The Company has elected the modified
prospective transition method for adopting SFAS 123R. Under
this method, the provisions of SFAS 123R apply to all
awards granted or modified after the date of adoption, as well
as to the future vesting of awards granted and not vested as of
the date of adoption. The amounts included in the consolidated
statements of operations relating to share-based payments are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cost of professional services,
subscription and hosting
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
4,578
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
7,332
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
7,471
|
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
Restructuring and other charges,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,539
|
|
|
$
|
2,996
|
|
|
$
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys deferred stock-based compensation balance of
$8.8 million as of September 30, 2005, which was
accounted for under APB 25, was reclassified against
additional
paid-in-capital
upon the adoption of SFAS 123R. The deferred stock-based
compensation balance was composed of $4.8 million from the
issuance of Restricted Awards and $4.0 million relating to
the intrinsic value of stock options assumed in the
Companys September 2005 acquisition of Former Nuance. The
unrecognized expense of awards not yet vested at October 1,
2005 is being recognized in net income (loss) in the periods
after that date, based on their fair value which was determined
using the Black-Scholes valuation method, and the assumptions
determined under the original provisions of SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
In connection with the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company
is required to amortize stock-based instruments with
performance-related vesting terms over the period from the grant
date to the sooner of the date upon which the performance
vesting condition will be met (when that condition is expected
to be met), or the time-based vesting dates. The cumulative
effect of the change in accounting principle from APB 25 to
SFAS 123R relating to this change was $0.7 million,
and is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations for fiscal 2006.
Stock
Options
The Company has several share-based compensation plans under
which employees, officers, directors and consultants may be
granted stock options to purchase the Companys common
stock generally at the fair market value on the date of grant.
Plans do not allow for options to be granted at below fair
market value nor can they be re-priced at anytime. Options
granted under original plans of the Company become exercisable
over various periods, typically two to four years and have a
maximum term of 7 years. The Company also assumed an option
plan in connection with its acquisition of Former Nuance on
September 15, 2005. These stock options are governed by the
original agreement (the Former Nuance Stock Option
Plan) that they were issued under, but are now exercisable
for shares of the Company. No further stock options may be
issued under the Former Nuance Stock Option Plan. At
September 30, 2006, 28,535,613 shares were authorized
for grant under the Companys stock option plans, of which
5,131,476 shares were available for future grant. All stock
options have been granted with exercise prices equal to
88
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
or greater than the fair market value of the Companys
common stock on the date of grant. Stock options outstanding
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2003
|
|
|
17,845,632
|
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,489,750
|
|
|
$
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,238,588
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,301,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2004
|
|
|
16,794,938
|
|
|
$
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed in acquisition of Former
Nuance
|
|
|
9,379,433
|
|
|
$
|
3.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
4,534,050
|
|
|
$
|
4.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,655,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,938,498
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2005
|
|
|
27,114,849
|
|
|
$
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,417,064
|
|
|
$
|
8.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(7,582,650
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,138,454
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(1,156,726
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2006
|
|
|
20,654,083
|
|
|
$
|
4.80
|
|
|
|
5.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
72.4 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30,
2006
|
|
|
13,026,514
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
5.3 years
|
|
|
$
|
54.3 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based
on the positive difference between the closing market value of
the Companys common stock on September 30, 2006
($8.17) and the exercise price of the underlying options. |
89
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding under all stock option plans at September 30,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Exercise Price Range
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Life in Years
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$0.16 $1.35
|
|
|
2,314,894
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
2,314,415
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
$1.41 $3.45
|
|
|
2,426,512
|
|
|
|
6.52
|
|
|
$
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
1,959,801
|
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
$3.46 $3.88
|
|
|
2,305,710
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
$
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
1,067,542
|
|
|
$
|
3.79
|
|
$3.92 $4.29
|
|
|
2,402,242
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
|
|
$
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
1,665,646
|
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
$4.30 $4.84
|
|
|
2,384,340
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
$
|
4.53
|
|
|
|
1,694,883
|
|
|
$
|
4.51
|
|
$4.86 $5.36
|
|
|
2,614,464
|
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
1,522,898
|
|
|
$
|
5.29
|
|
$5.38 $6.97
|
|
|
2,887,310
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
$
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
2,561,859
|
|
|
$
|
6.31
|
|
$7.03 $9.30
|
|
|
2,626,047
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
|
$
|
8.15
|
|
|
|
226,220
|
|
|
$
|
7.49
|
|
$10.06 $11.81
|
|
|
687,564
|
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
|
$
|
11.02
|
|
|
|
13,250
|
|
|
$
|
10.14
|
|
$12.41 $12.41
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
6.58
|
|
|
$
|
12.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.16 $12.41
|
|
|
20,654,083
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
|
|
$
|
4.80
|
|
|
|
13,026,514
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options to purchase 13,026,514, 17,709,565 and
10,018,921 shares of common stock were exercisable as of
September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
As of September 30, 2006, the total unamortized fair value
of stock options was $24.7 million with a weighted average
remaining recognition period of 2.3 years. During fiscal
years 2006, 2005, and 2004 the following activity occurred under
the Companys plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair
value per share
|
|
$
|
4.52
|
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised
|
|
$
|
36.7 million
|
|
|
$
|
3.3 million
|
|
|
$
|
11.7 million
|
|
The fair value of the stock options granted in fiscal 2006 was
estimated on the dates of grant using the Black-Scholes model
with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
60.9
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that the Company
has never paid cash dividends and has no present intention to
pay cash dividends. Expected volatility is based on the
historical volatility of the Companys common stock over
the period commensurate with the expected life of the options
and the historical implied volatility from traded options with a
term of 180 days or greater. The risk-free interest rate is
derived from the average U.S. Treasury STRIPS rate during
the period, which approximates the rate in effect at the time of
grant, commensurate with the expected life of the instrument.
Upon the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company used the
simplified method provided for under SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107, which averages the contractual term
of the Companys options (7.0 years) with the vesting
term (2.2 years). Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2006
the Company estimated the expected life based on the historical
exercise behavior.
90
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted
Awards
The Company is authorized to issue equity incentive awards in
the form of Restricted Awards. Unvested Restricted Awards may
not be sold, transferred or assigned. The fair value of the
Restricted Awards is measured based upon the market price of the
underlying common stock as of the date of grant, reduced by the
purchase price of $0.001 per share of the awards. The
Restricted Awards generally are subject to vesting of a period
of two to four years, and may have opportunities for
acceleration for achievement of defined goals. Beginning in
fiscal 2006, the Company began to issue certain Restricted
Awards with vesting solely dependent on the achievement of
specified performance targets. The fair value of the Restricted
Awards is amortized to expense over its applicable vesting
period using the straight-line method. In the event that the
employees employment with the Company terminates, or in
the case of awards with only performance goals those goals are
not met, any unvested share shall be forfeited and revert to the
Company.
Restricted Units are not included in issued and outstanding
common stock until the shares are vested, at which point they
are included as issued and outstanding. The table below
summarizes activity relating to Restricted Units during fiscal
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Shares Underlying
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
391,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4,274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2004
|
|
|
387,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
580,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(101,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(16,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2005
|
|
|
849,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,473,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(471,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(101,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2006
|
|
|
2,750,054
|
|
|
|
1.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
22.5 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to become exercisable
|
|
|
2,478,679
|
|
|
|
1.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
20.2 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based
on the positive difference between the closing market value of
the Companys common stock on September 30, 2006
($8.17) and the exercise price of the underlying Restricted
Units. |
The purchase price for vested Restricted Units is
$0.001 per share. As of September 30, 2006, unearned
share-based payments expense related to unvested Restricted
Units is $16.1 million, which will, based on expectations
of future performance vesting criteria, where applicable, be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
43.7% of the Restricted Units outstanding as of
September 30, 2006 are subject to performance vesting
acceleration conditions. During fiscal years 2006, 2005, and
2004 the following activity occurred related to Restricted Units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair
value per share
|
|
$
|
9.15
|
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
|
$
|
4.52
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares
vested
|
|
$
|
4.0 million
|
|
|
$
|
0.5 million
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
91
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted Stock is included in the issued and outstanding
common stock in these financial statements at date of grant. The
table below summarizes activity relating to Restricted Stock
during fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Shares Underlying
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested balance at
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
579,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
752,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(187,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(46,389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance at
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
1,098,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
446,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(215,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(203,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance at
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
1,125,703
|
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
745,145
|
|
|
$
|
7.63
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(311,671
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.22
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(11,836
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance at
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
1,547,341
|
|
|
$
|
5.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price for vested Restricted Stock is
$0.001 per share. As of September 30, 2006, unearned
share-based payments expense related to unvested Restricted
Stock is $6.2 million, which will, based on expectations of
future performance vesting criteria, when applicable, be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
85.6% of the Restricted Stock outstanding as of
September 30, 2006 are subject to performance vesting
acceleration conditions. During fiscal years 2006, 2005, and
2004 the following activity occurred related to Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair
value per share
|
|
$
|
7.63
|
|
|
$
|
3.79
|
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
Total fair value of shares vested
|
|
$
|
2.2 million
|
|
|
$
|
1.0 million
|
|
|
$
|
1.0 million
|
|
The Company has historically repurchased common stock upon its
employees vesting in Restricted Awards, in order to allow
the employees to cover their tax liability as a result of the
Restricted Awards having vested. Assuming that the Company
repurchased one-third of all vesting Restricted Awards
outstanding as of September 30, 2006, such amount
approximating a tax rate of its employees, and based on the
weighted average recognition period of 1.4 years, the
Company would repurchase approximately 2.0 million shares
during the twelve month period ending September 30, 2007.
During fiscal 2006, the Company repurchased 183,322 shares
of common stock at a cost of $1.4 million to cover
employees tax obligations related to vesting of Restricted
Awards.
1995
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Companys 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
Plan), as amended and restated on May 14, 2005,
authorizes the issuance of a maximum of 3,000,000 shares of
common stock in semi-annual offerings to employees at a price
equal to the lower of 85% of the closing price on the applicable
offering commencement date or 85% of the closing price on the
applicable offering termination date. Compensation expense for
the employee stock purchase plan is recognized in accordance
with SFAS 123R. At September 30, 2006,
1,010,830 million shares were reserved for future issuance.
During fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, The Company issued 419,561,
385,265 and 332,119 shares of common stock under this plan,
respectively. The weighted average fair value of all purchase
rights granted in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, were $2.62, $1.29
and $1.51.
92
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of the purchase rights granted under this plan
was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model that uses the following weighted-average
assumptions which were derived in a manner similar to those
discussed above relative to stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
55.1
|
%
|
|
|
52.3
|
%
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
The Company has various operating leases for office space around
the world. In connection with many of its acquisitions the
Company assumed facility lease obligations. Among these assumed
obligations are lease payments related to certain office
locations that were vacated by certain of the acquired companies
prior to the acquisition date (Note 12). Additionally,
certain of the Companys lease obligations have been
included in various restructuring charges (Note 13). The
following table outlines the Companys gross future minimum
payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of
September 30, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Leases Under
|
|
|
Other Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Obligations Assumed
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
6,028
|
|
|
$
|
2,035
|
|
|
$
|
12,371
|
|
|
$
|
20,434
|
|
2008
|
|
|
7,020
|
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
12,780
|
|
|
|
21,360
|
|
2009
|
|
|
6,720
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
13,202
|
|
|
|
21,353
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,627
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
13,639
|
|
|
|
19,809
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,842
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
14,172
|
|
|
|
19,574
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
19,425
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
22,754
|
|
|
|
43,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
49,662
|
|
|
$
|
7,051
|
|
|
$
|
88,918
|
|
|
$
|
145,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2006, the Company has subleased certain
office space to third parties. Total
sub-lease
income under contractual terms is $21.9 million, which
ranges from $1.7 million to $3.0 million on an annual
basis through February 2016.
Total rent expense charged to operations was approximately
$7.2 million, $7.4 million and $4.0 million for
the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
In connection with certain of its acquisitions, the Company
assumed certain financial guarantees that the acquired companies
had committed to the landlords of certain facilities. These
financial guarantees are secured by the 2006 Credit Facility or
are secured by certificates of deposit. The total financial
guarantees were $17.8 million, of which $0.8 and
$11.7 million were secured by certificates of deposit which
were classified as restricted cash in other assets as of
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Litigation
and Other Claims
Like many companies in the software industry, the Company has,
from time to time been notified of claims that it may be
infringing certain intellectual property rights of others. These
claims have been referred to counsel, and they are in various
stages of evaluation and negotiation. If it appears necessary or
desirable, the Company may seek licenses for these intellectual
property rights. There is no assurance that licenses will be
offered by all claimants, that the terms of any offered licenses
will be acceptable to the Company or that in all cases the
dispute
93
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
will be resolved without litigation, which may be time consuming
and expensive, and may result in injunctive relief or the
payment of damages by the Company.
On November 9, 2006, VoiceSignal Technologies, Inc. filed
an action against the Company and eleven of its resellers in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
claiming patent infringement. VoiceSignal is seeking damages and
injunctive relief. In the lawsuit, VoiceSignal alleges that the
Company is infringing United States Patent No. 5,855,000
which is related to improving correction in a dictation
application based on a two input analysis. The Company believes
the claims have no merit, and intends to defend the action
vigorously.
On August 22, 2006, z4 Technologies, Inc. filed an action
against the Company and five other defendants, including
Symantec, Adobe, Quark, ABBYY and Mathsoft, in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas claiming patent
infringement. Damages were sought in an unspecified amount. In
the lawsuit, z4 Technologies alleges that the Company is
infringing United States Patent Nos. 6,044,471 and 6,785,825
which are directed to a method and apparatus for reducing
unauthorized software use. On December 4, 2006, the Company
entered into a settlement agreement with z4 Technologies
regarding this action. (See Note 23.)
On May 31, 2006 GTX Corporation (GTX), filed an
action against the Company in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas claiming patent infringement.
Damages were sought in an unspecified amount. In the lawsuit,
GTX alleged that the Company was infringing United States Patent
No. 7,016,536 entitled Method and Apparatus for
Automatic Cleaning and Enhancing of Scanned Documents. The
Company believes the claims have no merit, and it intends to
defend the action vigorously.
On November 27, 2002, AllVoice Computing plc
(AllVoice) filed an action against the Company in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Texas claiming patent infringement. In the lawsuit, AllVoice
alleges that the Company is infringing United States Patent
No. 5,799,273 entitled Automated Proofreading Using
Interface Linking Recognized Words to Their Audio Data While
Text Is Being Changed (the 273 Patent). The
273 Patent generally discloses techniques for manipulating audio
data associated with text generated by a speech recognition
engine. Although the Company has several products in the speech
recognition technology field, the Company believes that its
products do not infringe the 273 Patent because, in addition to
other defenses, they do not use the claimed techniques. Damages
are sought in an unspecified amount. The Company filed an Answer
on December 23, 2002. On January 4, 2005, the case was
transferred to a new judge of the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas for administrative reasons.
The United States District Court for the Southern District of
Texas entered summary judgment against AllVoice and dismissed
all claims against Nuance on February 21, 2006. AllVoice
filed a notice of appeal from the judgment on April 26,
2006.
In August 2001, the first of a number of complaints was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York, on behalf of a purported class of persons who
purchased Former Nuance stock between April 12, 2000 and
December 6, 2000. Those complaints have been consolidated
into one action. The complaint generally alleges that various
investment bank underwriters engaged in improper and undisclosed
activities related to the allocation of shares in Former
Nuances initial public offering of securities. The
complaint makes claims for violation of several provisions of
the federal securities laws against those underwriters, and also
against Former Nuance and some of the Former Nuances
directors and officers. Similar lawsuits, concerning more than
250 other companies initial public offerings, were filed
in 2001. In February 2003, the Court denied a motion to dismiss
with respect to the claims against Former Nuance. In the third
quarter of 2003, a proposed settlement in principle was reached
among the plaintiffs, issuer defendants (including Former
Nuance) and the issuers insurance carriers. The settlement
calls for the dismissal and release of claims against the issuer
defendants, including Former Nuance, in exchange for a
contingent payment to be paid, if necessary, by the issuer
defendants insurance carriers and an assignment of certain
claims. The timing of the conclusion of the settlement remains
unclear, and the settlement is subject to a number of
conditions, including approval of the Court. The settlement is
not expected to have any material impact upon Former Nuance or
the Company, as payments, if any, are expected to be made by
insurance carriers, rather than by Former Nuance. In July 2004,
the underwriters filed a motion opposing approval
94
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
by the court of the settlement among the plaintiffs, issuers and
insurers. In March 2005, the court granted preliminary approval
of the settlement, subject to the parties agreeing to modify the
term of the settlement which limits each underwriter from
seeking contribution against its issuer for damages it may be
forced to pay in the action. On April 24, 2006, the court
held a fairness hearing in connection with the motion for final
approval of the settlement. The court has yet to issue a ruling
on the motion for final approval. On December 5, 2006, the
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the
Courts order certifying a class in several test
cases that had been selected by the underwriter defendants
and plaintiffs in the coordinated proceeding. The settlement
remains subject to a number of conditions, including final court
approval. In the event the settlement is not concluded, the
Company intends to defend the litigation vigorously. The Company
believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims against
Former Nuance.
The Company believes that the final outcome of the current
litigation matters described above will not have a significant
adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements.
However, even if the Companys defense is successful, the
litigation could require significant management time and will be
costly. Should the Company not prevail in these litigation
matters, its operating results, financial position and cash
flows could be adversely impacted.
Guarantees
and Other
The Company currently includes indemnification provisions in the
contracts into which it enters with its customers and business
partners. Generally, these provisions require the Company to
defend claims arising out of its products infringement of
third-party intellectual property rights, breach of contractual
obligations
and/or
unlawful or otherwise culpable conduct on its part. The
indemnity obligations imposed by these provisions generally
cover damages, costs and attorneys fees arising out of
such claims. In most, but not all, cases, the Companys
total liability under such provisions is limited to either the
value of the contract or a specified, agreed upon amount. In
some cases its total liability under such provisions is
unlimited. In many, but not all, cases, the term of the
indemnity provision is perpetual. While the maximum potential
amount of future payments the Company could be required to make
under all the indemnification provisions in its contracts with
customers and business partners is unlimited, it believes that
the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal due to
the low frequency with which these provisions have been
triggered.
The Company has entered into agreements to indemnify its
directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized or
permitted under applicable law. These agreements, among other
things, provide for the indemnification of its directors and
officers for expenses, judgments, fines, penalties and
settlement amounts incurred by any such person in his or her
capacity as a director or officer of the Company, whether or not
such person is acting or serving in any such capacity at the
time any liability or expense is incurred for which
indemnification can be provided under the agreements. In
accordance with the terms of the SpeechWorks merger agreement,
the Company is required to indemnify the former members of the
SpeechWorks board of directors, on similar terms as described
above, for a period of six years from the acquisition date. In
connection with this indemnification, the Company was required
to purchase a director and officer insurance policy related to
this obligation for a period of three years from the date of
acquisition, this three-year policy was purchased in 2003. In
accordance with the terms of each of the Former Nuance and
Dictaphone merger agreements, the Company is required to
indemnify the former members of the Former Nuance and Dictaphone
boards of directors, on similar terms as described above, for a
period of six years from the acquisition date. In
connection with these indemnifications, the Company has
purchased director and officer insurance policies related to
these obligations covering the full period of six years.
At September 30, 2006, the Company has $7.5 million
non-cancelable purchase commitments for inventory to fulfill
customers orders currently scheduled in its backlog.
95
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Pension
and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
|
Defined
Contribution Plan
The Company has established a retirement savings plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the
401(k) Plan). The 401(k) Plan covers substantially
all employees of the Company who meet minimum age and service
requirements, and allows participants to defer a portion of
their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis. Effective
July 1, 2003, Company match of employees
contributions was established, dollar for dollar up to 2% of
salary. Employees who were hired prior to April 1, 2004 are
100% vested into the plan as soon as they start to contribute to
the plan. Employees hired April 1, 2004 and thereafter,
vest one-third of the contribution annually over a three-year
period. The Companys contributions to the 401(k) Plan
totaled $1.1 million, $0.7 million and
$0.5 million for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
Plan
In connection with the acquisition of Dictaphone on
March 31, 2006, the Company assumed the assets and
obligations related to its defined benefit pension plans, which
provide certain retirement and death benefits for former
Dictaphone employees located in the United Kingdom and Canada.
These two pension plans were frozen prior to March 31,
2006. The Company also assumed a post-retirement health care and
life insurance benefit plan, which is frozen relative to new
enrollment, and which provides certain post-retirement health
care and life insurance benefits, as well as a fixed subsidy for
qualified former employees in the United States and Canada.
The following table shows the changes in fiscal 2006 in the
projected benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status of
the defined benefit pension plans and the other post-retirement
benefit plan. The measurement date for benefit obligations was
March 31, 2006 and the measurement date for the plan assets
was September 30, 2006 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Change in Benefit
Obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation,
September 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefit obligation assumed in
connection with the acquisition of Dictaphone
|
|
|
22,537
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Plan participants
contributions
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expenses paid
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation,
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
24,157
|
|
|
$
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Change in Plan
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets,
September 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Plan assets acquired in connection
with the acquisition of Dictaphone
|
|
|
17,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Plan participants
contributions
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses paid
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets,
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
18,713
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
(5,444
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,374
|
)
|
Unrecognized actuarial gain (loss)
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(5,174
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
September 30, 2006 consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid benefit cost
|
|
$
|
2,276
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
|
(7,450
|
)
|
|
|
(1,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(5,174
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligations for the two defined benefit
pension plans was $24.0 million at September 30, 2006.
Included in the table below are the amounts relating to the
Companys UK pension plan which has an accumulated benefit
obligations and projected benefit obligations in excess of plan
assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Aggregate projected benefit
obligations
|
|
$
|
21,022
|
|
|
$
|
1,374
|
|
Aggregate accumulated benefit
obligations
|
|
|
20,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
13,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost of the benefit plans
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Plan
Assumptions:
Weighted-average assumptions used in developing the benefit
obligations and net periodic benefit cost for the plans were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Average compensation increase
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
NA
|
(1)
|
Expected rate of return on plan
assets
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
NA
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate of compensation increase is not applicable to the
Companys other benefits as compensation levels do not
impact earned benefits. |
|
(2) |
|
Expected return on plan assets is not applicable to the
Companys other benefit plan as the plan is unfunded. |
Because the benefit provided to retirees under the other
postretirement benefit plan consists of a fixed subsidy, no
health care cost trend is assumed in the measurement of the
post-retirement benefit obligations and net periodic benefit
costs for fiscal 2006.
The Company considered several factors when developing the
expected return on plan assets including the analysis of return
relevant to the country where each plan is in effect as well as
the historical rates of return from investment. In addition, the
Company reviews local actuarial projections and market outlook
from investment managers. The expected rate of return above is
weighted to reflect each countrys relative portion of the
plan assets.
Assets
Allocation and Investment Strategy:
The percentages of the fair value of plan assets actually
allocated and targeted for allocation, by asset category, at
September 30, 2006, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
63.1
|
%
|
|
|
57.0
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
36.9
|
%
|
|
|
43.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys investment goal for pension plan assets is
designed to provides as much assurance as is possible, in the
Companys opinion, that the pension assets are available to
pay benefits as they come due and minimize market risk. The
expected long-term rate of return for the plan assets is 6.3%
for the UK pension plan and 7.5% for the Canadian pension plan.
Employer
Contributions:
The Company expects to contribute $1.7 million to its
pension plans in fiscal 2007. Included in this contribution is a
minimum funding requirement associated with its UK pension which
requires annual minimum payment of £859,900 (approximately
$1.6 million based on exchange rate at September 30,
2006) for each of the next 5 years until fiscal 2011.
Its other post-retirement benefits plan is a non-funded plan,
and cash contributions are made each year to cover claims costs
incurred in that year. Total cash paid during fiscal 2006 for
the post-retirement health care and life insurance benefit plan
was not material, and the Company does not expect that the
amount in fiscal 2007 will be material.
98
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Estimated
Future Benefit Payments:
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
2012-2016
|
|
|
6,592
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,790
|
|
|
$
|
699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the income tax provision (benefit) are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
451
|
|
State
|
|
|
4,420
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,333
|
|
|
|
1,762
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
7,638
|
|
|
$
|
4,682
|
|
|
$
|
705
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
State
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,811
|
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
15,144
|
|
|
$
|
6,812
|
|
|
$
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For financial reporting purposes, income (loss) before income
taxes includes the following components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Domestic income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(16,318
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,586
|
|
|
$
|
(10,413
|
)
|
Foreign income (loss)
|
|
|
9,247
|
|
|
|
(4,191
|
)
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (losses) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(7,071
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,395
|
|
|
$
|
(8,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
247,337
|
|
|
$
|
167,771
|
|
Federal and state credit
carryforwards
|
|
|
24,685
|
|
|
|
15,865
|
|
Capitalized
start-up and
development costs
|
|
|
8,069
|
|
|
|
6,405
|
|
Accrued expenses and other reserves
|
|
|
34,505
|
|
|
|
44,679
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
53,454
|
|
|
|
4,343
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
4,418
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
3,068
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
375,065
|
|
|
|
243,529
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred
tax assets
|
|
|
(329,722
|
)
|
|
|
(214,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
45,343
|
|
|
|
28,695
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired intangibles
|
|
|
(64,848
|
)
|
|
|
(32,936
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(19,505
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(19,926
|
)
|
|
|
(4,241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(19,505
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had federal net
operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$602.0 million and $379.0 million, respectively, of
which approximately $24.6 million and $29.0 million,
respectively, relate to tax deductions from share-based
payments. At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had
state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$84.7 million and $93.0 million, respectively. At
September 30, 2006, the Company had federal and state
research and development carryforwards of approximately
$16.3 million and $9.6 million, respectively. At
September 30, 2005, the Company had federal and state
research and development credit carryforwards of approximately
$9.6 million and $6.5 million, respectively. The net
operating loss and credit carryforwards will expire at various
dates beginning in 2009 and extending through 2025, if not
utilized.
Utilization of the net operating losses and credits are subject
to an annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations
provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state
tax provisions. The annual limitation will result in the
expiration of certain net operating losses and credits before
utilization.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our
provision for income taxes and in determining whether deferred
tax assets will be realized in full or in part. When it is more
likely than not that all or some portion of specific deferred
tax assets such as net operating losses or foreign tax credit
carryforwards will not be realized, a valuation allowance must
be established for the amount of the deferred tax assets that
are determined not likely to be realizable. Realization is based
upon a number of factors, including our ability to generate
sufficient future taxable income. The valuation allowance was
determined in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires
an assessment of both positive and negative evidence when
determining whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax
assets are recoverable. Such assessment is required on a
jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction
basis. The Company does not expect to reduce its valuation
allowance significantly
100
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
until sufficient positive evidence exists, including sustained
profitability, that its deferred tax assets are more likely than
not to be realized. The Company will maintain a full valuation
allowance on its net U.S. deferred tax assets until
sufficient positive evidence exists to support reversal of the
valuation allowance.
As of September 30, 2006, the companys valuation
allowance for U.S. net deferred tax assets totaled
$312.1 million, which consists of the beginning of the year
allowance of $193.3 million and 2006 charges (benefits) of
$10.1 million to income from operations and
$0.7 million to other comprehensive income. A portion of
the deferred tax liabilities are created by goodwill, and are
not allowed as an offset to deferred tax assets for purposes of
determining the amount of valuation allowance required.
Following the adoption of SFAS 142, deferred tax
liabilities resulting from the different treatment of goodwill
for book and tax purposes cannot offset deferred tax assets in
determining the valuation allowance. As a result, a deferred tax
provision is required to increase the Companys valuation
allowance.
The valuation allowance reduces the carrying value of the
deferred tax assets generated by foreign tax credits, reserves
and accruals and net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, which
would require sufficient future ordinary income in order to
realize the tax benefits. If the Company generates taxable
income through profitable operations in future years it may be
required to recognize these deferred tax assets through the
reduction of the valuation allowance which would result in a
material benefit to its results of operations in the period in
which the benefit is determined, excluding the recognition of
the portion of the valuation allowance which relates to net
deferred tax assets acquired in a business combination and
share-based payments. The valuation allowance associated with
tax assets arising in connection with share-based payments of
$8.7 and $11.0 million as of September 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively, will be accounted for as additional paid in
capital. The valuation allowance associated with tax assets
arising from business combinations of $264.3 and
$178.5 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, when released, will reduce goodwill, other
intangible assets, and to the extent remaining, the provision
for income taxes.
A reconciliation of the Companys effective tax rate to the
statutory federal rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
(32.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign taxes
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
180.6
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
State tax, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(40.9
|
)
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
Nondeductible expenditures
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(159.5
|
)
|
|
|
323.4
|
|
|
|
(70.1
|
)
|
Federal research and development
credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Federal benefit
refundable taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Federal credits, net
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(214.2
|
)%
|
|
|
488.3
|
%
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cumulative amount of undistributed earnings of the
Companys foreign subsidiaries amounted to, approximately
$10.4 million at September 30, 2006. The Company has
not provided any additional federal or state income taxes or
foreign withholding taxes on the undistributed earnings, as such
earnings have been indefinitely reinvested in the business. An
estimate of the tax consequences from the repatriation of these
earnings is not practicable at this time resulting from the
complexities of the utilization of foreign tax credits and other
tax assets.
101
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
20.
|
Segment
and Geographic Information and Significant Customers
|
The Company has reviewed the provisions of SFAS 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, with respect to the criteria necessary to
evaluate the number of operating segments that exist. Based on
its review, the Company has determined that it operates in one
segment. Changes in the organization or the Companys
management reporting structure, as well as other events and
circumstances, including but not limited to technological
advances, increased competition and changing economic or market
conditions, could result in (a) shorter estimated useful
lives, (b) additional reporting units, which may require
alternative methods of estimating fair values or greater
disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by reporting unit,
and/or
(c) other changes in previous assumptions or estimates. In
turn, this could have a significant impact on the consolidated
financial statements through accelerated amortization
and/or
impairment charges.
Revenue, classified by the major geographic areas in which the
Companys customers are located, were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
288,300
|
|
|
$
|
160,927
|
|
|
$
|
91,472
|
|
International
|
|
|
100,210
|
|
|
|
71,461
|
|
|
|
39,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
388,510
|
|
|
$
|
232,388
|
|
|
$
|
130,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States composed greater than
10% of total revenue.
The following table presents revenue information for principal
product lines, which do not constitute separate segments (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Speech
|
|
$
|
316,106
|
|
|
$
|
164,244
|
|
|
$
|
86,594
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
72,404
|
|
|
|
68,144
|
|
|
|
44,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
388,510
|
|
|
$
|
232,388
|
|
|
$
|
130,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two distribution and fulfillment partners, Ingram Micro and
Digital River, each accounted for 6% of the Companys
consolidated revenue for fiscal 2006, 11% and 9% for fiscal 2005
and 14% and 8% for fiscal 2004, respectively. No customer
accounted for greater than 10% of accounts receivable as of
September 30, 2006 or 2005.
The following table summarizes the Companys long-lived
assets, including intangible assets and goodwill, by geographic
location (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
865,884
|
|
|
$
|
515,477
|
|
International
|
|
|
105,869
|
|
|
|
66,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
971,753
|
|
|
$
|
582,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
21.
|
Pro Forma
Results (Unaudited)
|
The following table reflects unaudited pro forma results of
operations of the Company assuming that the Telelogue,
Rhetorical, ART, Phonetic, Former Nuance and Dictaphone
acquisitions had occurred on October 1, 2004 (in thousands,
except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
470,340
|
|
|
$
|
448,277
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(63,317
|
)
|
|
$
|
(82,504
|
)
|
Net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
At December 31, 2003, Xerox owned approximately 15% of the
Companys outstanding common stock and all of the
Companys outstanding Series B Preferred Stock. In
addition, Xerox had the opportunity to acquire additional shares
of common stock pursuant to a warrant (Note 15). On
March 19, 2004, the Company announced that Warburg Pincus,
had agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of the
Companys stock held by Xerox Corporation for approximately
$80 million. As a result of the Xerox and Warburg Pincus
transaction, Xerox is no longer a related party as of
June 30, 2004. During fiscal 2004, Xeroxs related
party revenue accounted for approximately 1% of the
Companys total revenue under several non-exclusive
agreements in which the Company grants Xerox the royalty-bearing
right to copy and distribute certain versions of the
Companys software programs. The Company does not engage in
transactions in the normal course of its business with Warburg
Pincus.
At September 30, 2005, a member of the Companys Board
of Directors was a senior executive at Convergys Corporation. In
October 2005, the member of the Companys Board of
Directors discontinued his affiliation with Convergys, and as a
result, Convergys is no longer a related party. The Company and
Convergys have entered into multiple non-exclusive agreements in
which Convergys resells the Companys software. Revenue
from Convergys during fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 were not
material.
A member of the Companys Board of Directors is also a
partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation, a law firm that provides services to
the Company. In fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company paid
$4.9 million, $2.1 million and $0.7 million,
respectively, to Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati for
professional services provided to the Company. As of
September 30, 2006 and 2005 the Company had
$0.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively, included
in accounts payable and accrued expenses to Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich & Rosati.
On December 4, 2006, the Company entered into a settlement
and license agreement with z4 Technologies regarding the actions
filed against the Company on August 22, 2006. In connection
with this settlement the Company agreed to license various
technologies from z4 Technologies, Inc. $0.4 million is included
in cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets in the
accompanying fiscal 2006 statement of operations.
On December 5, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement
and plan of merger to acquire Mobile Voice Control, Inc.
(MVC), a provider of speech-enabled mobile search
and messaging services headquartered in Mason, Ohio. The
transaction is expected to close prior to December 31, 2006
and is subject to customary closing conditions. Under the terms
of the plan of merger, the purchase price payable to MVCs
stockholders consists of cash and 824,276 shares of the
Companys common stock. Up to an additional
1,700,840 shares of common stock may also be issued, if at
all, upon the achievement of certain revenue milestones for the
calendar years 2007 and 2008; no portion of these contingent
shares is guaranteed.
103
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
24.
|
Quarterly
Data (Unaudited)
|
The following information has been derived from unaudited
consolidated financial statements that, in the opinion of
management, include all recurring adjustments necessary for a
fair statement of such information (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
75,552
|
|
|
$
|
71,728
|
|
|
$
|
113,096
|
|
|
$
|
128,134
|
|
|
$
|
388,510
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
55,415
|
|
|
$
|
51,506
|
|
|
$
|
76,028
|
|
|
$
|
84,518
|
|
|
$
|
267,467
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(4,892
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,380
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,400
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,215
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,887
|
)
|
Net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
156,389
|
|
|
|
163,407
|
|
|
|
167,482
|
|
|
|
168,244
|
|
|
|
163,873
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
156,389
|
|
|
|
163,407
|
|
|
|
167,482
|
|
|
|
168,244
|
|
|
|
163,873
|
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 included an impairment charge
of $2.6 million that was recorded in order to value the
purchased computer software at its net realizable value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
60,578
|
|
|
$
|
53,113
|
|
|
$
|
56,814
|
|
|
$
|
61,883
|
|
|
$
|
232,388
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
42,606
|
|
|
$
|
36,264
|
|
|
$
|
40,018
|
|
|
$
|
44,297
|
|
|
$
|
163,185
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,141
|
|
|
$
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
(7,716
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,417
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
104,973
|
|
|
|
105,563
|
|
|
|
108,713
|
|
|
|
118,816
|
|
|
|
109,540
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
112,430
|
|
|
|
105,563
|
|
|
|
116,413
|
|
|
|
118,816
|
|
|
|
109,540
|
|
104
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed (i) to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed and summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2006, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Remediation
of Prior Year Material Weakness
During fiscal 2006, we took steps toward remediation of the
identified material weakness related to tax accounting area due
to lack of tax accounting resources and control deficiency
related to the review of tax accounting which is discussed in
detail in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005. These steps
included engaging external tax advisors to assist in the review
of our income tax calculations, and accelerating the timing of
certain tax review activities during the financial statement
close process. Additionally, management performed an assessment
of our tax organization and recruited a Vice President of
Taxation and Treasury to improve our internal control and
communication processes and the overall level of expertise
within the group. We believe these actions have strengthened our
internal control over financial reporting and addressed the
material weakness identified above.
The planned remediation steps set forth above were designed and
initiated following the identification of the material weakness
and deployed as soon as practicable throughout fiscal year 2006,
during which, management continued to evaluate the operating
effectiveness of our internal controls. All the steps identified
in the above remediation plan have been implemented as of
September 30, 2006.
Management
Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external reporting purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of our assets;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and
directors; and
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
105
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006,
utilizing the criteria set forth in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). We have excluded from our evaluation, the internal
control over financial reporting of Dictaphone Corporation,
which was acquired on March 31, 2006 and is included in the
fiscal year 2006 consolidated financial statements of Nuance
Communications, Inc. since the date of acquisition, and
constituted 42.8% of consolidated assets as of
September 30, 2006, and 20.1% of consolidated revenue for
the year then ended.
Based on the results of this assessment, management (including
our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer) has
concluded that, as of September 30, 2006, our internal
control over financial reporting was effective.
The attestation report concerning managements assessment
of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting, and the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2006 issued by BDO
Seidman, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
appears on page 51 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
During fiscal 2006 management performed an assessment of our tax
organization and, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006,
recruited a Vice President of Taxation and Treasury to improve
our internal control and communication processes and the overall
level of expertise within the group. Except for the preceding
change, there have been no changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting other than the remediation steps described above.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
Not applicable.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
since we intend to file our definitive Proxy Statement for our
next Annual Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Proxy Statement), within 120 days
of the end of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report,
and certain information to be included in the Proxy Statement is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
The information required by this item concerning our directors
is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
section titled Election of Directors in our Proxy
Statement. Information required by this item concerning our
executive officers is incorporated by reference to the
information set forth in the section entitled Executive
Compensation, Management and Other Information in our
Proxy Statement. Information regarding Section 16 reporting
compliance is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth in the section entitled Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in our Proxy
Statement.
Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics for all of our directors, officers and employees on
February 24, 2004. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
can be found at our website: www.nuance.com. We will provide to
any person without charge, upon request, a copy of our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics. Such a request should be made in
writing and addressed to Investor Relations, Nuance
Communications, Inc., 1 Wayside Road, Burlington, MA 01803.
To date, there have been no waivers under our Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics. We will post any waivers, if and when
granted, of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our
website at www.nuance.com.
106
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item regarding executive
compensation is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth in the sections titled Executive Compensation,
Management and Other Information in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholders Matters
|
The information required by this item regarding security
ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
sections titled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management and Equity Compensation
Plans in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
The information required by this item regarding certain
relationships and related transactions is incorporated by
reference to the information set forth in the section titled
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in
our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this section is incorporated by
reference from the information in the section entitled
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors
in our Proxy Statement.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
Report:
(1) Financial Statements See Index to Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this Report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules All schedules
have been omitted as the requested information is inapplicable
or the information is presented in the financial statements or
related notes included as part of this Report.
(3) Exhibits See Item 15(b) of this Report
below.
(b) Exhibits.
107
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Paul A. Ricci
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
KNOW ALL THESE PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Paul A. Ricci
and James R. Arnold, Jr. jointly and severally, his or her
attorneys-in-fact,
each with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and
all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each said
attorneys-in-fact,
or his or her substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, Annual Report on
Form 10-K
has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ Paul A. Ricci
Paul
A. Ricci, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ James R.
Arnold, Jr.
James
R. Arnold, Jr., Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ Steven E. Hebert
Steven
E. Hebert, Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
Charles
Berger, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ Robert Finch
Robert
Finch, Director
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ Robert J.
Frankenberg
Robert
J. Frankenberg, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ John C. Freker
John
C. Freker, Jr., Director
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey A.
Harris
Jeffrey
A. Harris, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ William H.
Janeway
William
H. Janeway, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ Katharine A.
Martin
Katharine
A. Martin, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ Mark Myers
Mark
Myers, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ Philip Quigley
Philip
Quigley, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: December 14, 2006
|
|
/s/ Robert G. Teresi
Robert
G. Teresi, Director
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated
October 7, 2002, between Koninklijke Philips Electronics
N.V. and the Registrant.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
33-100647
|
|
2.4
|
|
12/6/2002
|
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Purchase
Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2002, between
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and the Registrant.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
33-100647
|
|
2.5
|
|
2/7/2003
|
|
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Purchase
Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2003, between
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and the Registrant.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
33-100647
|
|
2.6
|
|
2/7/2003
|
|
|
|
2
|
.4
|
|
Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization, dated April 23, 2003, by and among the
Registrant, Spiderman Acquisition Corporation and SpeechWorks
International, Inc.
|
|
S-4
|
|
33-106184
|
|
Annex A
|
|
6/17/2003
|
|
|
|
2
|
.5
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of May 4, 2004, as amended on May 28, 2004,
by and among the Registrant, Tennis Acquisition Corporation,
Telelogue, Inc., Pequot Venture Partners II, L.P.,
PVP II Telelogue Prom Note 2 Grantor Trust, Palisade
Private Partnership II, L.P., and NJTC Venture Fund SBIC
LP, Martin Hale as stockholder representative and U.S. Bank
National Association as escrow agent.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
6/30/2004
|
|
|
|
2
|
.6
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of November 14, 2004, by and among ScanSoft, Write
Acquisition Corporation, ART Advanced Recognition Technologies,
Inc., and with respect Article I, Article VII and
Article IX only, Bessemer Venture Partners VI, LP, as
stockholder representative.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
11/18/2004
|
|
|
|
2
|
.7
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of November 15, 2004, by and among Phonetic
Systems, LTD., Phonetics Acquisition LTD., ScanSoft, and
Magnum Communications Fund L.P., as stockholder
representative.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.2
|
|
11/18/2004
|
|
|
|
2
|
.8
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and
Plan of Merger, made and entered into as of February 1,
2005, and effective as of November 15, 2004, by and among
ScanSoft, Phonetics Acquisition Ltd., Phonetic Systems Ltd. and
Magnum Communications Fund L.P., as Shareholder Representative.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
2/7/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
2
|
.9
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by
and among ScanSoft, Nova Acquisition Corporation, Nova
Acquisition LLC, and Nuance Communications, Inc., dated
May 9, 2005.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
1.1
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
|
|
2
|
.10
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by
and among Nuance Communications, Inc., Phoenix Merger Sub, Inc.
and Dictaphone Corporation dated as of February 7, 2006.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
2/9/2006
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.2
|
|
5/11/2001
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and
Merger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
10/19/2005
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the
Registrant.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.2
|
|
3/15/2004
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
8-A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
12/6/1995
|
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Preferred
Shares Rights Agreement, dated as of October 23, 1996, as
amended and restated as of March 15, 2004, between the
Registrant and U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation, including
the Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and
Privileges of Series A Participating Preferred Stock, the
form of Rights Certificate and Summary of Rights attached
thereto as Exhibits A, B and C, respectively.
|
|
8-A/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4
|
|
3/19/2004
|
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Amendment, dated May 5, 2005,
to Amended and Restated Preferred Shares Rights Agreement
between ScanSoft and U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.8
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant.
|
|
S-4
|
|
333-70603
|
|
Annex A
|
|
1/14/1999
|
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement,
dated March 19, 2004, by and among Xerox Imaging Systems,
Inc., Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII I C.V., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII II C.V., Warburg Pincus
Germany Private Equity VIII K.G., and the Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
5/10/2004
|
|
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated
March 19, 2004, by and between the Registrant and Warburg
Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus Netherlands
Private Equity VIII I C.V., Warburg Pincus Netherlands Private
Equity VIII II C.V., and Warburg Pincus Germany Private
Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.2
|
|
5/10/2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrants,
dated March 15, 2004, issued to Warburg Pincus Private
Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus Netherlands Private Equity
VIII I C.V., Warburg Pincus Netherlands Private Equity
VIII II C.V., and Warburg Pincus Germany Private Equity
VIII K.G.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.3
|
|
5/10/2004
|
|
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as
of May 5, 2005, by and between the Registrant and Warburg
Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus Netherlands
Private Equity VIII I C.V., Warburg Pincus Netherlands Private
Equity VIII II C.V., and Warburg Pincus Germany Private
Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
S-4/A
|
|
333-125496
|
|
Annex F
|
|
8/1/2005
|
|
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Amended and Restated Stockholders
Agreement, dated May 5, 2005, by and between the Registrant
and Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII I C.V., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII II C.V., and Warburg Pincus
Germany Private Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
S-4/A
|
|
333-125496
|
|
Annex G
|
|
8/1/2005
|
|
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrants,
dated May 9, 2005, issued to Warburg Pincus Private Equity
VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus Netherlands Private Equity VIII I
C.V., and Warburg Pincus Germany Private Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
S-4
|
|
333-125496
|
|
4.11
|
|
6/3/2005
|
|
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement,
dated as of May 5, 2005, by and between the Registrant and
Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII C.V. I. and Warburg Pincus
Germany Private Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.2
|
|
8/9/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
10.1
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement
Number 1, dated as of August 21, 2000, by and between
the Registrant and Paul A. Ricci.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-49656
|
|
4.3
|
|
11/9/2000
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Gold Disk Bundling Agreement,
dated as of September 30, 1999, as amended by Amendment
Number 1, dated as of January 1, 2000, between the
Registrant and Xerox Corporation.
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.15
|
|
8/8/2001
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Caere Corporation 1992
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-33464
|
|
10.4
|
|
3/29/2000
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan,
as amended.*
|
|
S-1
|
|
33-100647
|
|
10.17
|
|
10/21/2002
|
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
as amended and restated on April 27, 2000.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
Annex D
|
|
4/13/2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Amended and Restated
1995 Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
3/17/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
1997 Employee Stock Option Plan,
as amended.*
|
|
S-1
|
|
33-100647
|
|
10.19
|
|
10/21/2002
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-74343
|
|
99.1
|
|
3/12/1999
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock
Option Plan.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
3/17/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
2000 NonStatutory Stock Option
Plan, as amended.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
4.1
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
ScanSoft 2003 Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
4.3
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 2001
Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.1
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 2000
Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.2
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Nuance Communications 1998 Stock
Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.3
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Nuance Communications 1994
Flexible Stock Incentive Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.4
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Purchase
Agreement.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit
Purchase Agreement.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
2005 Severance Benefit Plan for
Executive Officers.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Officer Short-term Disability
Plan.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Technology Transfer and License
Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2003, between
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and the Registrant.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
33-100647
|
|
10.30
|
|
2/7/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Letter, dated February 17,
2003, from the Registrant to Jeanne McCann regarding certain
employment matters.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
5/15/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective
August 11, 2006, by and between the Registrant and Paul A.
Ricci.*
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
11/8/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
March 9, 2004, by and between the Registrant and John
Shagoury.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Letter, dated May 23, 2004,
from the Registrant to Steven Chambers regarding certain
employment matters.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Letter, dated September 27,
2004, from the Registrant to James R. Arnold, Jr. regarding
certain employment matters.*
|
|
10-KT
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.39
|
|
1/6/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Letter dated September 25,
2006, from the Registrant to Don Hunt regarding certain
employment matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
14
|
.1
|
|
Registrants Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
14.1
|
|
3/15/2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney. (See Signature
Page).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes management compensatory plan or arrangement |