e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-14773
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
75-2230700 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
2300 WEST PLANO PARKWAY
PLANO, TEXAS
75075
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(972) 577-0000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of registrants common stock outstanding as of May 1, 2009: 119,857,174 shares of
Class A Common Stock.
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Item 1: Financial Statements (Unaudited)
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
Property, equipment and purchased software, net |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
Deferred contract costs, net |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets, net |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
1,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Non-current deferred revenue |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
1,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
1
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, |
|
|
|
except per share data) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
Direct cost of services |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
119,453 |
|
|
|
119,754 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
120,433 |
|
|
|
121,076 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Change in deferred taxes |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Other non-cash items |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects from acquisitions of businesses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Deferred contract costs, net |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Other current and non-current assets |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other current and non-current liabilities |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, equipment and software |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Acquisitions of businesses, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common and treasury stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. General
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The
interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of Perot
Systems Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries with all significant intercompany
transactions eliminated. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and
cash flows for the interim periods presented have been made. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and
regulations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on February 25, 2009. Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, are
not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2009.
Significant accounting standards to be adopted
FSP No. FAS 157-4, FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, and FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued three FASB Staff Positions (FSPs)
that are intended to provide additional guidance and enhance disclosures regarding fair value
measurements and impairment of securities. These FSPs are: FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair
Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly; FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments; and FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. The FSPs are effective for the
interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact
these FSPs will have on our results of operations and financial positions.
2. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined under FAS 157 as the price that would be paid upon sale of an asset or upon
transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. Fair value is
calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability, not on assumptions specific to us. In addition, the fair value of assets and liabilities
includes consideration of non-performance risk, including credit risk.
FAS 157 utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to
measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three
levels:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities
in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions. |
4
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table summarizes the bases used to measure certain financial assets and financial
liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Active |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Identical |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Items |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|
2009 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
(in millions) |
Cash equivalents money market funds |
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign currency derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Options |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
3. Derivative Financial Instruments
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment to FAS 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. FAS 161 requires that objectives
for using derivative financial instruments be disclosed in terms of the underlying risk and
accounting designation. Additionally, FAS 161 requires that the fair value of derivative financial
instruments and their gains and losses be presented in tabular format in order to present a more
complete picture of the effects of using derivative financial instruments.
As part of our risk management strategy, we enter into derivative financial instruments to mitigate
certain financial risks related to foreign currencies and interest rates. We have a risk management
policy defining the conditions under which we can enter into derivative financial instrument
transactions. To date, our use of derivative financial instruments has been limited to interest
rate swaps that hedge our exposure to floating rates on certain portions of our debt and forward
contracts and options that hedge our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
We account for certain foreign currency derivative financial instruments under FAS 133 and have
designated them as cash flow hedges. We hedge the variability of a portion of our anticipated
foreign currency cash flows using forward contracts and zero cost collars. These derivative
financial instruments are designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted revenues related to our
operations in India. The remaining foreign currency derivative financial instruments are being
marked to market, with changes in fair value being reported in other income, net, in the condensed
consolidated income statements. As of March 31, 2009, the notional amount of foreign currency
derivative financial instruments outstanding totaled approximately $188 million, of which
approximately $146 million relates to derivative financial instruments for which we elected hedge
accounting. These derivative financial instruments expire at various dates over the next 33 months.
At March 31, 2009, the estimated net amount of loss that is expected to be reclassified into
earnings within the next 12 months is $12 million ($10 million, net of tax). As of March 31, 2009,
the unrealized loss on our foreign currency hedges, reflected in accumulated other comprehensive
income, was approximately $24 million ($19 million, net of tax).
We have two interest rate swaps, which are designated as cash flow hedges under FAS 133. The first
interest rate swap effectively converts $75 million of our borrowings under our credit facility
from a variable-rate instrument into a fixed-rate instrument with an interest rate of 5.28%. The
second interest rate swap effectively converts an additional $55 million of our borrowings under
our credit facility from a variable-rate instrument into a fixed-rate instrument with an interest
rate of 5.33%.
5
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
As of March 31, 2009, the unrealized loss on our interest rate swaps, reflected in accumulated
other comprehensive income, was approximately $2 million ($1 million, net of tax). Both interest
rate swaps will expire in 2009.
By using derivative financial instruments, we are exposed to credit and market risk. If a
counterparty fails to fulfill its performance obligations under a derivative contract, our credit
risk will equal the fair-value gain in a derivative financial instrument. Generally, when the fair
value of a derivative financial instrument is positive, this indicates that the counterparty owes
us, thus creating a repayment risk for us. When the fair value of a derivative financial instrument
is negative, we owe the counterparty and, therefore, assume no repayment risk. We minimize the
credit (or repayment) risk in derivative financial instruments by entering into transactions with
high-quality counterparties that are reviewed periodically by our Treasurer.
The fair values of our derivative financial instruments are reflected in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Derivative financial instruments designated as hedging
instruments under FAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Forward contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Option contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative financial instruments designated as hedging
instruments under FAS 133 |
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging
instruments under FAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging
instruments under FAS 133 |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following tables summarize activities related to our derivative financial instruments that are
classified as cash flow hedges in accordance with FAS 133:
The loss in fair value recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax (effective portion):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Forward contracts |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Option contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss in accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss in fair value reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings, net of tax (effective portion):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
Income Statement Location |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Forward contracts |
|
Revenue |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Option contracts |
|
Revenue |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss reclassified to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in fair value resulting from ineffectiveness is insignificant.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we recognized an insignificant gain and a $1
million loss, respectively, on our forward contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments
under FAS 133.
4. Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2009, by
reportable segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry |
|
|
Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
431 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
730 |
|
Reduction of goodwill resulting from Tellurian acquisition |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2009, we completed our valuation of the intangible assets related to
the acquisition of Tellurian Networks, Inc. As a result, $1 million of goodwill was reclassed to
amortizable intangible assets.
7
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
5. Identifiable Intangible Assets
Identifiable intangible assets are composed of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Service marks |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
Customer-based assets |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense for identifiable intangible assets was $5 million and $4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amortization expense is estimated at $18
million, $16 million, $13 million, $4 million, and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2009
through 2013, respectively. Identifiable intangible assets are amortized over their estimated
useful lives, ranging from one to ten years.
6. Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income, net of tax, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments into earnings |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Stockholders Equity
At March 31, 2009, there were 119,788,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock outstanding. At
December 31, 2008, there were 119,429,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock outstanding.
8. Stock Options and Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation
We account for our stock-based compensation under FAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which
requires stock-based awards to be accounted for under the fair value method.
Our 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan allows us to grant stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock or cash awards to employees, directors or consultants. As of January 1, 2009, we
began granting stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs) in place of stock options in order
to reduce the number of shares issued under our stock-based compensation plans. SSARs permit a
holder the right to receive the value in shares of the appreciation in the price of our stock that
occurred from the date the right was granted to the date of exercise.
8
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, stock-based compensation expense recorded in
direct cost of services and selling, general and administrative expenses, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Direct cost of services |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation expense |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Total stock based compensation expense, net of tax |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
At March 31, 2009, there was $47 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of expected
forfeitures, from unvested stock-based compensation awards, which is expected to be recognized over
a weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate our actual stock-based employee
compensation expense, and the assumptions used were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Weighted average risk free interest rates |
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
2.78 |
% |
Weighted average life (in years) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Weighted average grant-date fair value per share of awards granted |
|
$ |
3.63 |
|
|
$ |
4.06 |
|
Activity in our stock-based compensation plans
Activity in stock options and SSARs for Class A Common Stock was as follows (options and SSARs in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Options/ |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
SSARs |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
15,420 |
|
|
|
15.25 |
|
|
|
16,240 |
|
|
|
15.00 |
|
Granted (1) |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
11.77 |
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
9.34 |
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
9.96 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
17.10 |
|
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
15.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31 |
|
|
16,061 |
|
|
|
15.03 |
|
|
|
17,082 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
|
Exercisable at March 31 |
|
|
10,221 |
|
|
|
15.57 |
|
|
|
9,882 |
|
|
|
15.40 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All awards granted for the three months ended March 31, 2009, were SSARs. |
For outstanding and exercisable options and SSARs at March 31, 2009, the weighted average remaining
contractual term (in years) is 3.52 and 2.54, respectively. For outstanding and exercisable options
and SSARs at March 31, 2009, the aggregate intrinsic value is $11 million and $8 million,
respectively.
9
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Activity in restricted stock units for Class A Common Stock was as follows (restricted stock units
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
14.68 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
14.90 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
11.78 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
14.26 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
11.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
14.62 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
14.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31 |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
13.14 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
14.70 |
|
9. Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2009 was 30.0% as compared to 37.8% for the first
quarter of 2008. Income tax expense for the first quarter of 2009 was lower primarily due to a $3
million tax benefit attributable to the resolution in March 2009 of certain tax issues with the
Internal Revenue Service related to our consolidated federal income tax returns for the tax years
2003 and 2004. The tax benefit consisted primarily of the reversal of interest and penalty
accruals.
The gross balance of reserves for uncertain tax positions was $13 million at March 31, 2009, which
excludes $7 million of offsetting tax benefits, primarily from international tax treaties that
provide for relief from double taxation. The net unrecognized tax benefits of $6 million, if
recognized, would benefit our effective income tax rate. The
$3 million decrease to the gross balance of reserves for
uncertain tax positions in the first quarter of 2009 reflects the resolution of tax
issues.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of
income tax expense. As discussed above, we recognized a $3 million benefit related to interest and
penalties (net of tax benefit) as a component of income tax expense in the condensed consolidated
income statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Interest and penalties recorded as a
component of income tax expense were insignificant for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. Accrued
interest and penalties, net of tax benefit, related to unrecognized tax benefits were approximately
$2 million as of March 31, 2009 and $5 million as of December 31, 2008.
10
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
10. Segment Data
The following is a summary of certain financial information by reportable segment for the three
months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry |
|
Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions |
|
Services |
|
Other(1) |
|
Total |
|
|
(in millions) |
For the three months ended March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
621 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other includes our remaining operating areas and corporate activities, income and expenses
that are not related to the operations of the other reportable segments, and the elimination
of intersegment revenue and direct costs of services of approximately $1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 related to the provision of services by the Industry Solutions
segment to the Government Services segment. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we
recorded $6 million for cost reduction activities in this segment. |
11. Earnings Per Common Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted
earnings per common share computations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Basic Earnings per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28,379 |
|
|
$ |
28,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
119,453 |
|
|
|
119,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28,379 |
|
|
$ |
28,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
119,453 |
|
|
|
119,754 |
|
Incremental shares assuming dilution |
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
120,433 |
|
|
|
121,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Stock awards that were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share because their effect was antidilutive are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Common stock options/SSARs |
|
|
11,716 |
|
|
|
10,636 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
We determined whether a stock award was dilutive or antidilutive by determining the shares issuable
upon exercise or vesting, net of shares assumed to be purchased out of proceeds at the average
market price for the periods presented.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
We are, from time to time, involved in various litigation matters. We do not believe that the
outcome of the litigation matters in which we are currently a party, either individually or taken
as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows. However, we cannot predict with certainty any eventual loss or range of
possible loss related to such matters.
We currently purchase and intend to continue to purchase the types and amounts of insurance
coverage customary for the industry and geographies in which we operate. We have evaluated our
risk and consider the coverage we carry to be adequate both in type and amount for the business we
conduct.
IPO Allocation Securities Litigation
In July and August 2001, we, as well as some of our current and former officers and directors and
the investment banks that underwrote our initial public offering, were named as defendants in two
purported class action lawsuits seeking unspecified damages for alleged violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933. These cases focus on alleged
improper practices of investment banks. Our case has been consolidated for pretrial purposes with
approximately 300 similar cases in the IPO Allocation Securities Litigation and certain issues,
including class certification issues, are being considered in a limited number of test cases. In
December 2006, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the trial courts class certifications
in the test cases, finding the predominance of common questions over individual questions that is
required for class certification cannot be met by those plaintiffs.
Other
In addition to the matters described above, we have been, and from time to time are, named as a
defendant in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business, including arbitrations,
class actions and other litigation involving commercial and employment disputes. Certain of these
proceedings include claims for substantial compensatory or punitive damages or claims for
indeterminate amounts of damages. We are contesting liability and/or the amount of damages, in
each pending matter.
12
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events
or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by
terminology such as may, will, should, could, forecasts, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential, see, target, projects,
position, or continue or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These
statements reflect our current expectations, estimates, and projections. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are
difficult to predict. Actual events or results may differ materially from what is expressed or
forecasted in these forward-looking statements. In evaluating these statements, you should
specifically consider various factors, including the risks described in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which have not materially changed. These risk factors
describe reasons why our actual results may differ materially from any forward-looking statement.
We disclaim any intention or obligation to update any forward-looking statement.
Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the information under the heading Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Lines of Business
We offer our services under two primary lines of business: Industry Solutions and Government
Services. Industry Solutions, our largest line of business, provides services to our customers
primarily under long-term contracts in strategic relationships. These services include technology,
applications, and business process services, as well as industry domain-based, short-term project
and consulting services. Industry Solutions also provides software-related services, including the
implementation of prepackaged software applications, application development and maintenance, and
application systems migration and testing under short-term contracts related to specific projects.
The Government Services segment provides information technology infrastructure and application
services, consulting, engineering support, and technology-based business process solutions for the
Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, various civilian agencies including the
Department of Education and NASA, various federal intelligence agencies, and other governmental
agencies. Based on a quantitative and qualitative analysis of varying factors, we may increase or
decrease the amount of ongoing investment in both of these business areas, make acquisitions that
strengthen our market position, or divest, exit, or downsize aspects of a business area.
Overview of Our Financial Results for the First Quarter of 2009
Our financial results are affected by a number of factors, including broad economic conditions, the
amount and type of technology spending by our customers, and the business strategies and financial
condition of our customers and the industries we serve, which could result in increases or
decreases in the amount of services that we provide to our customers and the pricing of such
services. Our ability to identify and effectively respond to these factors is important to our
future financial growth.
We are monitoring current macroeconomic and credit market conditions and levels of business
confidence and their potential effect on our clients and on us. A severe or prolonged economic
downturn could adversely affect our clients financial condition and the levels of business
activities in the industries and geographies where we operate. Such a downturn could reduce demand
and depress pricing for our services, especially with respect to discretionary project services or
our clients could become unable to meet their financial obligations to us under the terms of our
existing services agreements. Additionally, our clients and suppliers may be unable to generate
cash flows or obtain financing to meet payment or delivery obligations to us, may decide to
downsize, or may defer or cancel contracts, all of which could negatively affect revenue. These
potential consequences of a severe or prolonged economic downturn could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
13
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We evaluate our consolidated performance on the basis of several performance indicators. The four
key performance indicators we use are revenue growth, earnings growth, free cash flow, and the
value of contracts signed. We compare these key performance indicators to both annual target
amounts established by management and to our performance for prior periods. We establish the
targets for these key performance indicators primarily on an annual basis, but we may revise them
during the year. We assess our performance using these key indicators on a quarterly and annual
basis.
Revenue Growth
Revenue growth is a measure of the growth we generate from sales of services to new customers,
expansion and extension of existing contracts, acquisitions, and sales of discretionary services to
existing customers. Revenue for the first quarter of 2009 decreased by 8.7% compared to the first
quarter of 2008. As discussed in more detail below, this decrease in revenue came primarily from:
|
|
A reduction in project work associated with project cancellations related to software
implementation and product engineering services, projects that did not reach target operating
levels in the quarter, and reduced staffing levels on existing projects. |
|
|
|
A reduction of pass-through revenue as a result of transitioning the contract management
function back to a client. |
|
|
|
An unfavorable impact from currency on existing accounts. |
The decrease was partially offset by:
|
|
Revenue from new contracts signed during the twelve-month period following the first quarter
of 2008. |
|
|
|
Revenue from companies acquired in the second and fourth quarters of 2008. |
Earnings Growth
We measure earnings growth using diluted earnings per share, which is a measure of our
effectiveness in delivering profitable growth. Diluted earnings per share increased to $0.24 per
share from $0.23 per share for the first quarter of 2008. This increase came primarily from a
decrease in our effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2009 to 30.0%, as compared to the
effective rate of 37.8% for the first quarter of 2008. Income tax expense for the first quarter of
2009 was lower primarily due to a $3 million tax benefit attributable to the resolution of certain
tax issues with the Internal Revenue Service related to our consolidated federal income tax returns
for the tax years 2003 and 2004. The change in our tax rate resulted in a benefit of approximately
$0.03 per diluted share.
This improvement to our earnings was partially offset by expenses related to cost reduction
activities implemented in the first quarter of 2009 of approximately $0.03 per diluted share.
14
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Free Cash Flow
We calculate free cash flow on a year to date basis as net cash provided by operating activities
less purchases of property, equipment and purchased software, as stated in our Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We use free cash flow as a measure of our ability to
generate cash for both our short-term and long-term operating and business expansion needs. We
believe this measure provides important supplemental information to investors and allows them to
assess our ability to meet our working capital requirements and business expansion needs. Free cash
flow for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was a source of cash of $6 million. Free
cash flow, which is a non-GAAP measure, can be reconciled to Net cash provided by operating
activities as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
Purchases of property, equipment and purchased software |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Liquidity and Capital Resources below for additional discussion of net cash provided by
operating activities (under Operating Activities).
TCV of Contracts Signed
The amount of Total Contract Value (commonly referred to as TCV) that we sell during a
twelve-month period is a measure of our success in capturing new business in the various
outsourcing and consulting markets in which we provide services. TCV includes contracts with new
customers and new and previously uncommitted services with existing customers. We measure TCV as
our estimate of the total expected revenue from contracts that are expected to generate revenue in
excess of a defined amount during a contract term that exceeds a defined length of time.
Various factors may impact the timing of signing contracts with customers, including the complexity
of the contract, competitive pressures, and customer demands. As a result, we generally measure our
success in this area over a twelve-month period because of the significant variations that
typically occur in the amount of TCV signed during each quarterly period. During the twelve-month
period ending March 31, 2009, the amount of TCV signed was $1.2 billion, as compared to $1.8
billion for the twelve-month period ending March 31, 2008.
Additional Measurements
Both of our primary lines of business have distinct economic factors, business trends, and risks
that could affect our results of operations. As a result, in addition to the four metrics discussed
above that we use to measure our consolidated financial performance; we use similar metrics for
each of these lines of business and for certain industry groups and operating units within these
lines of business.
15
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Revenue
Revenue for the first quarter of 2009 decreased from revenue for the first quarter of 2008 across
both segments. Below is a summary of our revenue for the first quarter of 2009 as compared to the
first quarter of 2008 (amounts in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Industry Solutions |
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
)% |
Government Services |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
Elimination of intersegment revenue |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry Solutions
The net decrease in revenue from the Industry Solutions segment for the first quarter of 2009 as
compared to the first quarter of 2008 was primarily attributable to:
|
|
$62 million net decrease from existing accounts largely resulting from completing task orders
in the normal course of business, a reduction of discretionary project services, and a
renegotiated contract with less pass-through revenue as a result of transitioning a contract
management function back to the client. The discretionary services that we provide, which
include short-term project work, can vary from period-to-period depending on many factors,
including specific customer and industry needs and economic conditions. These decreases were
partially offset by expansion of our services among other customers. |
An unfavorable impact from currency of $12 million on existing accounts.
This decrease was partially offset by these increases:
|
|
$11 million increase from new contracts signed during the twelve-month period following the
first quarter of 2008. This increase was composed of $7 million and $4 million in revenue from
new contracts signed in the Healthcare and Commercial groups, respectively. The services that
we are providing to these new customers are primarily the same services that we provide to the
majority of our other long-term outsourcing customers. |
|
|
$11 million increase from revenue related to acquisitions within our Commercial group during
the second quarter of 2008 and an acquisition within our Healthcare group during the fourth
quarter of 2008. |
Government Services
Government Services revenue decreased $6 million, or 3.7% for the first quarter of 2009 as compared
to the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to $23 million of lower
revenue resulting from the ending of task orders in the normal course of business and reductions of
pass-through revenue. These decreases were partially offset by a $17 million, net increase in
revenue from contracts that were ramping up in the first quarter of 2008 and net increased level of
volumes and scope of services we provide. Our business with the federal government will fluctuate
due to annual federal funding limits and the specific needs of the federal agencies we serve.
16
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Gross Margin
Gross margin, which is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue, for the first quarter of
2009, was 19.0% of revenue, which is higher than the gross margin for the first quarter of 2008 of
17.4%. This year-to-year increase in gross margin was primarily due to the following:
|
|
Increased gross margin in Industry Solutions due to a reduction of pass-through revenue and
expenses, as a result of transitioning a contract management function back to a customer. |
|
|
Increased contract profitability on existing accounts in Industry Solutions caused by
contract efficiencies on fixed-priced contracts and volume increases on unit-priced contracts. |
|
|
Increased gross profit for Government Services related to a contract that was in transition
during the first quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
Increased profitability due to cost containment activities. |
These improvements were partially offset by increased expenses related to transitioning and
globalizing certain functions.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of 2009 increased 6.8% to $79
million from $74 million for the first quarter of 2008. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A for the
first quarter of 2009 was 12.7% of revenue as compared to SG&A for the first quarter of 2008 of
10.9% of revenue. The increase is primarily attributable to $6 million of expenses related to cost
reduction activities implemented in the first quarter of 2009.
Other Income Statement Items
Our effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2009 was 30.0% as compared to 37.8% for the first
quarter of 2008. Income tax expense for the first quarter of 2009 was lower primarily due to a $3
million tax benefit attributable to the resolution of certain tax issues with the Internal Revenue
Service related to the Companys consolidated federal income tax returns for the tax years 2003 and
2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2009, we have cash and cash equivalents of $266 million, of which $112 million was
held by our foreign subsidiaries. We also had short-term investments of $7 million at March 31,
2009, which were held in the U.S. While we are aware of no restrictions on access to our cash
balances in any foreign jurisdiction, it is our intent to permanently reinvest our foreign earnings
or to remit such earnings to the U.S. in a tax-free manner, and we do not provide for U.S. income
tax on the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries.
In addition, we currently have a credit facility that allows us to borrow up to $275 million. As
of March 31, 2009, we have borrowings of $177 million under the credit facility and $98 million
available. The credit facility requires certain financial covenants of which we are in compliance
as of March 31, 2009.
We believe
that we will be able to meet our liquidity and cash needs for the
foreseeable future through a combination
of cash flows from operating activities, existing cash balances, our available line of credit, and
other financing activities. However, during this current economic downturn, we continue to actively
monitor the financial markets. Although the condition of these markets continues to be volatile, we
believe we will continue to have access to them if the need arises. Continued market volatility
could directly affect the cost and terms of any future debt financing, which could in turn impact
our decisions to make acquisitions, purchase shares of our Class A common stock, or make other
investments in our business.
17
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $21 million and $20 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and for the three months ended March 31, 2008, respectively. This increase was
primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
Cash provided by changes in accounts receivable was $31 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, as compared to $16 million cash used in accounts receivable for the same
period of the prior year. We typically collect our accounts receivable within 60-65 days, and
therefore our accounts receivable balance at the end of each period can change based on the
amount of revenue for that period and the timing of collection from our customers, which may
vary significantly from period to period. |
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we made net cash payments for income taxes of
$3 million as compared to $10 million in the three months ended March 31, 2008. |
|
|
Cash used due to changes in accrued compensation was $47 million in the first quarter of
2009, as compared to $2 million cash provided by changes in accrued compensation in the first
quarter of 2008. The first quarter 2009 changes in accrued compensation are driven by the
compensation accrued as of December 31, 2008 that was paid during the first quarter of 2009.
Bonuses paid to associates under our bonus plans in the first quarters of 2009 and 2008
(including payments of annual bonuses relating to the previous years bonus plan) were $54
million and $15 million, respectively. |
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities was $15 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009, as compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $11 million for the same period
in 2008. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we liquidated short-term investments of $29
million, net as compared to $23 million, net during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $21 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008. During the first quarter of 2008, we purchased $24 million of treasury stock.
We routinely maintain cash balances in certain European and Asian currencies to fund operations in
those regions. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, foreign exchange rate fluctuations had
a net negative impact on our non-domestic cash balances of $7 million, as the U.S. dollar
strengthened against the Euro, Indian Rupee, Singapore Dollar, and other currencies. We manage
exchange exposures that are likely to significantly impact net income or working capital. At March
31, 2009, we had derivative financial instruments to purchase and sell various currencies in the
amount of $188 million, which expire at various times before the end of 2011.
Significant Accounting Standards to be Adopted
See Note 1, General, in the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion
of recent accounting pronouncements.
18
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
For a discussion of our market risk associated with foreign currencies as of December 31, 2008, see
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in Part II, Item 7A, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year then ended. There have been no material changes in these market
risks.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them in a timely
manner to material information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed with the SEC.
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are, from time to time, involved in various litigation matters. We do not believe that the
outcome of the litigation matters in which we are currently a party, either individually or taken
as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows. However, we cannot predict with certainty any eventual loss or range of
possible loss related to such matters.
We currently purchase and intend to continue to purchase the types and amounts of insurance
coverage customary for the industry and geographies in which we operate. We have evaluated our
risk and consider the coverage we carry to be adequate both in type and amount for the business we
conduct.
IPO Allocation Securities Litigation
In July and August 2001, we, as well as some of our current and former officers and directors and
the investment banks that underwrote our initial public offering, were named as defendants in two
purported class action lawsuits seeking unspecified damages for alleged violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933. These cases focus on alleged
improper practices of investment banks. Our case has been consolidated for pretrial purposes with
approximately 300 similar cases in the IPO Allocation Securities Litigation and certain issues,
including class certification issues, are being considered in a limited number of test cases. In
December 2006, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the trial courts class certifications
in the test cases, finding the predominance of common questions over individual questions that is
required for class certification cannot be met by those plaintiffs.
Other
In addition to the matters described above, we have been, and from time to time are, named as a
defendant in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business, including arbitrations,
class actions and other litigation involving commercial and employment disputes. Certain of these
proceedings include claims for substantial compensatory or punitive damages or claims for
indeterminate amounts of damages. We are contesting liability and/or the amount of damages, in
each pending matter.
19
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
Item 1A: Risk Factors
In evaluating all forward-looking statements, you should specifically consider various factors that
may cause actual results to vary from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Please
refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and available at www.sec.gov, for additional information
regarding risk factors. There have been no material changes to these risk factors.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NUMBER |
|
DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
3.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Perot
Systems Corporation (the Company) (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002.) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed
December 17, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen of Class A Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Registration Statement
on Form S-1, Registration No. 333-60755.) |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Rule 13a-14 Certification dated May 5, 2009, by Peter A. Altabef,
President and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Rule 13a-14 Certification dated May 5, 2009, by John E. Harper,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Section 1350 Certification dated May 5, 2009, by Peter A. Altabef,
President and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
32.2**
|
|
Section 1350 Certification dated May 5, 2009, by John E. Harper,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
20
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 5, 2009 |
By |
/s/ ROBERT J. KELLY
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Kelly |
|
|
|
Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
21