As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 10, 2001.
Registration No. 333-59094
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
---------------------
AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
---------------------
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
DELAWARE 1311 75-2702753
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (Primary standard industrial (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) classification code number) Identification No.)
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
(972) 444-9001
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)
---------------------
SCOTT D. SHEFFIELD
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
(972) 444-9001
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
---------------------
Copies to:
ROBERT L. KIMBALL BRIAN M. LIDJI
VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P. SAYLES, LIDJI & WERBNER
3700 TRAMMELL CROW CENTER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2001 ROSS AVENUE 4400 RENAISSANCE TOWER
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 1201 ELM STREET
(214) 220-7700 DALLAS, TEXAS 75270
(214) 939-8700
---------------------
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: As soon as
practicable after the effective date of this registration statement which
relates to the merger of limited partnerships with and into Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. pursuant to the merger agreement described in the enclosed
proxy statement/prospectus.
---------------------
If the securities being registered on this form are being offered in
connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with
General Instruction G, check the following box. [ ]
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
---------------------
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED MAXIMUM PROPOSED MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF AMOUNT TO BE OFFERING AGGREGATE OFFERING REGISTRATION
SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED REGISTERED(1) PRICE PER SHARE(2) PRICE(2) FEE(2)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common stock, $0.01 par value(3)......... 7,647,323 $7.99 $61,100,000 $15,275
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Based upon the registrant's estimate of the maximum number of shares that
might be issued in connection with the proposed merger transaction.
(2) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee
pursuant to Rule 457(f), based on the book value of the unaffiliated
partnership interests to be cancelled in the transaction, computed as of the
latest practicable date. A filing fee of $20,500 was paid pursuant to the
filing on April 17, 2001, by the registrant and Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. of a preliminary Schedule 13e-3. Pursuant to Rule 240.0-11(a)(2)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this amount has been credited
against the amount that would otherwise be payable in connection with this
filing, resulting in no additional payment herewith.
(3) Includes associated rights to purchase shares of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock. Until the occurrence of certain prescribed
events, none of which has occurred, the rights are not exercisable, are
evidenced by the certificates representing the common stock, and will be
transferred along with the common stock.
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING
PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETINGS OF LIMITED PARTNERS
TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 20, 2001
To the Limited Partners of 46
Parker & Parsley Limited Partnerships:
This is a notice that a special meeting of the limited partners of each of
the following 46 limited partnerships will be held on December 20, 2001, at
10:00 a.m., at the Dallas Marriott Las Colinas Hotel, 223 West Las Colinas
Blvd., Irving, Texas 75039:
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 87-A , Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Petroleum USA, Inc. and other predecessors of Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation that we call Pioneer USA,
sponsored each of the partnerships. Pioneer USA is the managing or sole general
partner of each of the partnerships. Pioneer USA is a direct 100% owned
subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company, a Delaware corporation that we
call Pioneer Parent.
The purpose of the special meeting for each partnership in which you own an
interest is for you to consider and vote on the following matters:
1. A proposal to approve an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
September 20, 2001, among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and each of the
partnerships. Each partnership that approves this proposal, which we call a
participating partnership, will merge with and into Pioneer USA, with
Pioneer USA surviving the merger. Each partnership interest of a
participating partnership, other than Pioneer USA's partnership interests,
will be converted into shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of
Pioneer Parent. The number of shares of common stock Pioneer Parent will
offer for all partnership interests of a participating partnership will be
based on (1) the participating partnership's merger value and (2) the
average closing price of the Pioneer Parent common stock, as reported by
the New York Stock Exchange, for the ten trading days ending December 17,
2001, three business days before December 20, 2001, the initial date
scheduled for the special meeting for the partnership. The merger value for
a participating partnership is equal to the sum of the present value of
estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil and gas
reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31, 2001,
less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution mailed on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its
partners. For purposes of illustration in this document, we have calculated
the number of shares to be issued based on an assumed average closing price
of $18.00 per share of Pioneer Parent common stock. Prior to December 20,
2001, the initial date scheduled for the special meeting for each
partnership, we will update the number of shares to be issued using the
actual average
closing price of Pioneer Parent common stock for the ten trading days
ending December 17, 2001, three business days before December 20, 2001, the
initial date of the special meeting. You may call D. F. King & Co., Inc.
after December 18, 2001 at 1-800-848-2998 to learn the final number of
shares you will receive. The Pioneer Parent common stock will be allocated
among the partners based on the liquidation provisions of each partnership
agreement. Pioneer Parent will not issue fractional shares to any limited
partner upon completion of the merger of any partnership. Instead, Pioneer
Parent will round any fractional shares of Pioneer Parent common stock up
to the nearest whole share. Pioneer USA will not receive any Pioneer Parent
common stock for its partnership interests in the participating
partnerships.
2. A proposal to amend the partnership agreement of each partnership
to permit the partnership's merger with Pioneer USA. If the amendment is
not approved, that partnership cannot merge into Pioneer USA even if the
partners of that partnership approve the merger agreement.
3. A proposal (A) to approve the opinion issued to Pioneer USA by
Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, of Wilmington, Delaware, relying as to
matters of Texas law on the opinion of Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas,
on behalf of the limited partners of each partnership that neither the
grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners (1) will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability or (2) will adversely affect the
federal income tax classification of the partnership or any of its limited
partners and (B) to approve the selection of Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP, and (as to Texas law matters) Arter & Hadden LLP as special
legal counsel for the limited partners of each partnership for the limited
purpose of rendering the legal opinion. The partnership agreement of each
partnership requires this opinion to be obtained and submitted to the
limited partners for their approval.
Pioneer USA is also requesting authorization to use its discretionary
voting authority to postpone or adjourn the special meeting of limited partners
for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies.
The accompanying proxy statement/prospectus contains information about each
merger, including the amount of Pioneer Parent common stock that will be offered
to limited partners per $1,000 initial investment in each partnership, and
descriptions of the merger agreement, the merger amendment and the legal opinion
of the special legal counsel for the limited partners. The proxy
statement/prospectus also contains a copy of the merger agreement, the merger
amendment and the legal opinion.
Pioneer USA set the close of business on September 21, 2001, as the record
date to identify the limited partners who are entitled to notice of and to vote
at each special meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the special
meeting. During the ten business days before the special meeting, you may
examine lists of the limited partners of each partnership in which you own an
interest at the offices of Pioneer USA during normal business hours for any
purpose relevant to the special meeting for each partnership in which you own an
interest.
ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2001, PIONEER USA'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY
DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP IN WHICH YOU OWN AN INTEREST IS
ADVISABLE, FAIR TO YOU AS AN UNAFFILIATED LIMITED PARTNER, AND IN YOUR BEST
INTERESTS. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU, AS AN UNAFFILIATED LIMITED PARTNER,
VOTE FOR THE MERGER AGREEMENT, THE MERGER AMENDMENT, THE SELECTION OF SPECIAL
LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS, THAT COUNSEL'S LEGAL OPINION FOR EACH
PARTNERSHIP IN WHICH YOU OWN AN INTEREST, AND THE AUTHORIZATION TO ALLOW PIONEER
USA TO USE ITS DISCRETIONARY VOTING AUTHORITY TO POSTPONE OR ADJOURN THE SPECIAL
MEETING. ALTHOUGH PIONEER USA'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS ATTEMPTED TO FULFILL ITS
FIDUCIARY DUTIES TO YOU, PIONEER USA'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAD CONFLICTING
INTERESTS IN EVALUATING EACH MERGER BECAUSE EACH MEMBER OF ITS BOARD OF
DIRECTORS IS ALSO AN OFFICER OF PIONEER PARENT. Each partnership requires a
favorable vote of the holders of a majority of its limited partnership interests
to approve the merger agreement, the merger amendment, the selection of special
legal counsel for the limited partners and that counsel's legal opinion, except
that Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. each require
the favorable vote of the holders, other than Pioneer USA, of 66 2/3% of its
limited partnership interests to approve those merger proposals. The
postponement or adjournment of the special meeting to solicit additional proxies
will require the favorable vote of a majority of the limited partnership
interests present or represented at a meeting where such vote is taken.
IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN YOUR PROXY CARD OR VOTE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING FOR A
PARTNERSHIP IN WHICH YOU OWN AN INTEREST, IT WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS IF YOU
VOTED AGAINST THE MERGER OF THAT PARTNERSHIP.
You are requested to sign, vote and date the enclosed proxy card and return
it promptly in the enclosed envelope, even if you expect to be present at each
special meeting for the partnerships in which you own an interest. If you give a
proxy, you can revoke it at any time before the special meeting for the
partnership as to which you are revoking your proxy. If you are present at the
special meeting for a partnership in which you own an interest, you may withdraw
your proxy and vote in person.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO VOTE ON THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP IN WHICH
YOU OWN AN INTEREST, PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO COMPLETE AND RETURN TO US THE
ENCLOSED CERTIFICATION OF NON-FOREIGN STATUS.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
/s/ MARK L. WITHROW
------------------------------------------
MARK L. WITHROW
Director, Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
October 12, 2001
THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. WE MAY
NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN
OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE
SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER 10,
2001
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY [PIONEER
COMMON STOCK LOGO]
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA,
INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE
1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
Dear Limited Partners:
We at Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., together with our parent company,
Pioneer Natural Resources Company, desire to acquire 46 limited partnerships. We
are the managing or sole general partner of each of the partnerships. We are a
Delaware corporation and call ourselves Pioneer USA. We are a wholly owned
subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company, a Delaware corporation that we
call Pioneer Parent.
If you and the other limited partners of a partnership approve the merger of
the partnership, the partnership will be merged with and into Pioneer USA, with
Pioneer USA surviving the merger. We call each partnership that merges into
Pioneer USA a participating partnership. Each partnership interest of a
participating partnership will be converted into shares of common stock, par
value $.01 per share, of Pioneer Parent. The number of shares of common stock
Pioneer Parent will offer for all partnership interests of a participating
partnership will be based on (1) the participating partnership's merger value
and (2) the average closing price of the Pioneer Parent common stock, as
reported by the New York Stock Exchange, for the ten trading days ending
December 17, 2001, three business days before December 20, 2001, the initial
date scheduled for the special meeting for the partnership. The merger value for
a participating partnership is equal to the sum of the present value of
estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil and gas
reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31, 2001, less
its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated expenses and
fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the cash distribution
mailed on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
The merger value for each partnership is based on the reserve value of the
partnership's underlying properties, which reserve value has not been reduced
for general and administrative expenses. As a result, we believe the merger
value is essentially the same value or a higher value than the liquidation value
that might have been achieved by selling the partnership's property interests on
March 31, 2001, and liquidating the partnership at that time.
We have retained Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc., which we call Stanger, to
issue an opinion regarding the fairness of the merger value to the limited
partners in connection with the merger of each partnership. The written opinion
of Stanger is contained in this document. You should read all of it carefully.
We can complete the merger of each partnership only if the holders of its
limited partnership interests approve the merger agreement, the amendment to the
partnership agreement to permit the merger, the selection of special legal
counsel for the limited partners, and that counsel's legal opinion. This
document provides information about each proposed merger. This document also
constitutes a prospectus by Pioneer Parent for up to an aggregate of 5,947,940
shares of Pioneer Parent common stock to be issued in the proposed merger
transaction, based on an assumed average closing price of $18.00 per share of
Pioneer Parent common stock. Please give all of this information your careful
attention. Pioneer Parent's common stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol "PXD." On October 9, 2001, the last reported sale
price of the common stock on the NYSE was $15.58 per share.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the special
meeting for each partnership in which you own an interest, please take the time
to vote by completing and mailing to us the enclosed proxy card. This will not
prevent you from revoking your proxy at any time prior to the special meeting
for each partnership in which you own an interest or from voting your
partnership interests in person if you later choose to attend the special
meeting for each partnership in which you own an interest.
We intend to mail certificates representing shares of Pioneer Parent common
stock to the partners of each partnership that approves the merger transaction
promptly after completing the merger of the partnership. Certificates
representing partnership interests will be automatically cancelled, and you will
not have to surrender your certificates to receive the Pioneer Parent common
stock.
YOUR CERTIFICATE THAT YOU ARE NOT A FOREIGN PERSON, WHICH WE CALL A
CERTIFICATION OF NON-FOREIGN STATUS, IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to
vote on the merger of each partnership in which you own an interest, please take
the time to complete and return to us the enclosed certification of non-foreign
status. If we receive a properly completed certification of non-foreign status
from you, we will not withhold federal income taxes on the Pioneer Parent common
stock to be issued to you upon the merger of each partnership in which you own
an interest.
Sincerely,
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISKS RELATING TO THE MERGER OF EACH
PARTNERSHIP IN WHICH YOU OWN AN INTEREST DESCRIBED IN "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING
ON PAGE 20. THESE INCLUDE:
- THE MERGER VALUE FOR THE PARTNERSHIP DETERMINES THE AMOUNT OF PIONEER
PARENT COMMON STOCK YOU WILL RECEIVE IN THE MERGER OF THE PARTNERSHIP.
PIONEER PARENT AND PIONEER USA DETERMINED EACH MERGER VALUE AND WILL NOT
ADJUST IT FOR CHANGES IN PARTNERSHIP VALUE BEFORE THE MERGER IS
COMPLETED.
- YOU WERE NOT INDEPENDENTLY REPRESENTED IN ESTABLISHING THE TERMS OF ANY
MERGER.
- OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAD CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN EVALUATING EACH
MERGER BECAUSE EACH MEMBER OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS ALSO AN OFFICER
OF PIONEER PARENT.
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
REGULATORS HAVE APPROVED ANY OF THE MERGERS, THE PIONEER PARENT COMMON STOCK TO
BE ISSUED IN EACH MERGER OR THE FAIRNESS OR THE MERITS OF EACH MERGER OR HAVE
DETERMINED WHETHER THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS ACCURATE OR
ADEQUATE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
This proxy statement/prospectus is dated October 12, 2001. It is first
being mailed to the limited partners on or about October 22, 2001.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
The world map below reflects the geographic locations of Pioneer Parent's
exploration, development and production operations.
(MAP)
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Pioneer Parent and each of the 25 partnerships listed below, which we call
the reporting partnerships, file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy
statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission:
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-A L.P.
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.
You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that
Pioneer Parent or any reporting partnership files at the SEC's public reference
room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of these
materials may also be obtained from the SEC for a fee by writing to the Public
Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further
information on the public reference room. Pioneer Parent's and each reporting
partnership's filings with the SEC are also available to the public from
commercial document retrieval services and at the web site maintained by the SEC
at www.sec.gov.
Pioneer Parent's common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and
the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "PXD." Pioneer Parent's reports and
other information filed with the SEC can also be inspected at the offices of the
New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Pioneer Parent filed a registration statement on Form S-4 to register with
the SEC Pioneer Parent common stock to be issued to the limited partners of each
participating partnership. This document is a part of that registration
statement and constitutes the prospectus of Pioneer Parent in addition to being
the proxy statement of each partnership. As allowed by SEC rules, this document
does not contain all the information you can find in the registration statement
or the exhibits to the registration statement.
The SEC allows Pioneer Parent to incorporate by reference information into
this document, which means that Pioneer Parent can disclose important
information to you by referring you to another document filed separately with
the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of this
document, except for any information superseded by information in this document.
This document incorporates by reference the documents set forth below that
Pioneer Parent has previously filed with the SEC and that contain important
information about Pioneer Parent and its finances:
- Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
- Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2001.
- Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 24, 2001.
- The description of Pioneer Parent common stock contained in Pioneer
Parent's registration statement on Form 8-A filed on August 5, 1997, as
amended by Form 8-A/A filed on August 8, 1997.
- The description of rights to acquire Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock of Pioneer Parent contained in Pioneer Parent's
registration statement on Form 8-A filed on July 24, 2001.
Pioneer Parent is also incorporating by reference additional documents that
it files with the SEC under sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 between the date of this document and the date of the
special meeting for each partnership.
The supplement to this document for each partnership contains financial
information for the partnership. The information supplement for each partnership
constitutes an integral part of this document. Please carefully read the
supplement for each partnership in which you are a limited partner.
Pioneer Parent has supplied all information contained or incorporated by
reference in this document relating to Pioneer Parent, and each partnership has
supplied all the information contained in this document relating to the
partnership.
You can obtain any of the documents incorporated by reference from Pioneer
Parent or the SEC. Documents incorporated by reference are available from
Pioneer Parent without charge. Exhibits to the documents will not be sent,
however, unless those exhibits have specifically been incorporated by reference
as exhibits in this document. Limited partners of each partnership may obtain
documents incorporated by reference in this document by requesting them in
writing or by telephone at the following address:
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400
Irving, Texas 75039
Telephone: (972) 969-3584
Attention: Investor Relations
IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST DOCUMENTS FROM PIONEER PARENT OR ANY
PARTNERSHIP IN WHICH YOU OWN AN INTEREST, PLEASE DO SO BY DECEMBER 13, 2001 TO
RECEIVE THEM BEFORE DECEMBER 20, 2001, THE INITIAL DATE SCHEDULED FOR THE
SPECIAL MEETING FOR THE PARTNERSHIP.
You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by
reference in this document to vote on the merger of each partnership in which
you own an interest. We have not authorized anyone to give any information that
is different from what is contained in this document. This document is dated
October 12, 2001. You should not assume that the information contained in this
document is accurate as of any date other than that date, and neither the
mailing of this document to you nor the issuance of Pioneer Parent common stock
in the merger of each partnership shall create an implication to the contrary.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER OF EACH
PARTNERSHIP............................................... v
SUMMARY..................................................... 1
RISK FACTORS................................................ 20
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP..... 20
The Merger Value for Each Partnership Involves Estimates
that May Vary Materially from the Quantities of Oil and
Gas Actually Recovered, and Consequently Future Net
Revenues May be Materially Different From the Estimates
Used in the Calculation of the Merger Value and for a
Particular Partnership................................. 20
The Merger Value for a Partnership Will Not Be Adjusted
For Changes in Oil and Gas Prices Before the Completion
of Its Merger.......................................... 20
The Number of Shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock the
Limited Partners of Each Partnership Will Receive May
Decrease Between Now and the Completion of the Merger
of the Partnership..................................... 20
Current Market Prices for Oil and Gas May Be Higher than
the Merger Value for a Partnership, Which May Affect
the Fairness Opinion................................... 20
You Were Not Independently Represented in Establishing the
Terms of the Merger of Each Partnership................ 21
The Interests of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and Their
Directors and Officers May Differ From Your Interests.. 21
It Is Unclear What the Market Demand Is For Any
Partnership or its Assets or That the Terms of the
Merger of Each Partnership Are As Favorable As Could Be
Obtained in a Third Party Sale......................... 21
Potential Litigation Challenging the Merger of a
Partnership May Delay or Block the Merger and, As a
Result, Your Receipt of the Pioneer Parent Common
Stock.................................................. 21
Repurchase Offers in 2001 by Each of the Six Partnerships
with a Repurchase Obligation were Higher than the
Merger Value for the Partnership....................... 22
You Could be Bound by the Merger of Each Partnership in
Which You Own an Interest Even If You Do Not Vote in
Favor of the Merger.................................... 22
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INVESTMENT IN PIONEER PARENT....... 22
Limited Partners Who Become Pioneer Parent Stockholders
Will Own Stock in a Corporation Rather than a Limited
Partnership Interest in a Limited Partnership,
Resulting in a Fundamental Change in the Nature of
Their Investments...................................... 22
Limited Partners Who Become Pioneer Parent Stockholders
Will Own an Investment That Will be Subject to the
Market Risks Attendant to an Investment in a Public
Company................................................ 23
Pioneer Parent Might Not Declare Dividends................ 23
Limited Partners Who Become Pioneer Parent Stockholders
May Be Diluted......................................... 23
Dividends Paid to Pioneer Parent Stockholders Are Taxed at
Two Levels............................................. 23
Pioneer Parent's Profitability is Highly Dependent on the
Prices of Oil and Gas, Which Have Historically Been
Very Volatile.......................................... 23
Pioneer Parent's Drilling Activities May Not be
Productive............................................. 24
Pioneer Parent May be Required to Recognize Non-cash
Charges Relating to Unproved Property Costs............ 24
Pioneer Parent's Growth Depends on its Ability to Acquire
Oil and Gas Properties on a Profitable Basis........... 24
If Pioneer Parent is Unable to Dispose of Non-strategic
Assets at Acceptable Prices, This Would Hinder its
Ability to Make Capital Resources Available for More
Profitable Activities.................................. 24
The Operation of Natural Gas Processing Plants Involves
the Potential for Damage Claims........................ 25
Pioneer Parent is Not Fully Insured Against Operating
Hazards................................................ 25
In the Event of Noncompliance, Liabilities Under
Environmental Laws and Regulations Could be
Substantial............................................ 25
There are Factors Outside of Pioneer Parent's Control
Which Could Impair its Ability to Satisfy its Debt
Obligations............................................ 25
The Oil and Gas Industry is Highly Competitive............ 25
Present or Future Regulations Could Adversely Affect
Pioneer Parent's Business and Operations............... 25
Pioneer Parent Has International Operations Which are
Subject to International Economic and Political
Risks.................................................. 25
Numerous Uncertainties Exist in Estimating Pioneer
Parent's Quantities of Proved Reserves and Future Net
Revenues............................................... 26
i
PAGE
----
SPECIAL FACTORS............................................. 27
Background of the Merger of Each Partnership.............. 27
Reasons for the Merger of Each Partnership................ 34
Recommendation of Pioneer USA............................. 37
Fairness Opinion.......................................... 37
Summary Reserve Report.................................... 45
Alternative Transactions to the Merger of Each
Partnership............................................ 46
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.................................. 48
METHOD OF DETERMINING MERGER VALUE FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP AND
AMOUNT OF PIONEER PARENT COMMON STOCK OFFERED............. 49
Components of Merger Value for Each Partnership........... 49
Allocation of Merger Value for Each Partnership Among
Partners of the Partnership............................ 50
Other Methods of Determining Merger Values................ 51
THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP.............................. 53
General................................................... 53
Legal Opinion for Limited Partners........................ 53
Distribution of Pioneer Parent Common Stock............... 54
Fractional Shares......................................... 54
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences............. 54
Accounting Treatment...................................... 57
Effect of Debt Owed by a Limited Partner to Pioneer USA on
Amount of Pioneer Parent Common Stock to be Received by
the Limited Partner.................................... 57
Effect of Merger of Each Partnership on Limited Partners
Who Do Not Vote in Favor of the Merger; No Appraisal or
Dissenters' Rights..................................... 57
Future of Nonparticipating Partnerships................... 57
Nonmanaging General Partners of Some Partnerships......... 58
Third Party Offers........................................ 58
Merger Amendment.......................................... 59
Termination of Registration and Reporting Requirements.... 59
Elimination of a Fairness Opinion Requirement That Would
Otherwise Benefit Pioneer USA.......................... 59
Payment of Expenses and Fees.............................. 60
THE MERGER AGREEMENT........................................ 61
Structure; Effective Time................................. 61
Effect of the Merger of Each Partnership.................. 61
Conduct of Business Prior to the Merger of Each
Partnership............................................ 61
Other Agreements.......................................... 61
Representations and Warranties of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer
USA and Each Partnership............................... 62
Conditions to the Merger of Each Partnership.............. 62
Termination of the Merger Agreement and the Merger of Any
Partnership............................................ 63
Amendments; Waivers....................................... 64
THE SPECIAL MEETINGS........................................ 65
Time and Place; Purpose................................... 65
Record Date; Voting Rights and Proxies.................... 66
Revocation of Proxies..................................... 67
Solicitation of Proxies................................... 67
Quorum.................................................... 67
Required Vote; Broker Non-Votes........................... 68
Participation by Assignees................................ 68
Special Requirements for Some Limited Partners............ 68
Validity of Proxy Cards................................... 68
Local Laws................................................ 69
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND
INFORMATION............................................... 69
ii
PAGE
----
INTERESTS OF PIONEER PARENT, PIONEER USA AND THEIR DIRECTORS
AND OFFICERS.............................................. 70
Conflicting Duties of Pioneer USA, Individually and as
General Partner........................................ 70
Pioneer USA's Employees Provide Services to the
Partnerships........................................... 70
Financial Interests of Directors and Officers............. 70
The Partnerships Pay Operator Fees to Pioneer USA......... 70
OWNERSHIP OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS.......................... 71
TRANSACTIONS AMONG ANY PARTNERSHIP, PIONEER PARENT, PIONEER
USA AND THEIR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS...................... 71
MANAGEMENT.................................................. 73
Pioneer Parent............................................ 73
Pioneer USA............................................... 75
PIONEER PARENT.............................................. 75
Key Projects to Increase Production....................... 76
More Information.......................................... 76
THE PARTNERSHIPS............................................ 77
General................................................... 77
The Drilling Partnerships................................. 77
The Income Partnerships................................... 78
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PARTNERS........... 79
General................................................... 79
Summary Comparison of Terms of Shares of Pioneer Parent
Common Stock and Partnership Interests................. 80
LEGAL MATTERS............................................... 87
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM
CONSULTANTS............................................... 87
COMMONLY USED OIL AND GAS TERMS............................. 88
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS........... P-1
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX
--------
General Information Relating to Each Partnership........................ A
Table 1 Jurisdiction of Organization, Initial Subscription Price for
Each Unit, Initial Investment by Limited Partners and Number
of Limited Partners as of July 31, 2001
Table 2 Merger Value Attributable to Pioneer USA, Nonmanaging
General Partners and Limited Partners
Table 3 Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of
Limited Partners Per $1,000 Investment
Table 4 Ownership Percentage and Merger Value Attributable to
Nonmanaging General Partners Other Than Pioneer USA
Table 5 Ownership Percentage and Merger Value Attributable to
Pioneer USA in Its Capacities as General Partner,
Nonmanaging General Partner and Limited Partner
Table 6 Voting Percentage and Initial Investment Owned by Pioneer
USA in Its Capacity as a Limited Partner as of July 31, 2001
Table 7 Historical Quarterly Partnership Distributions to the
Limited Partners Per $1,000 Investment from Inception
through July 31, 2001
Table 8 Annual Repurchase Prices and Aggregate Annual Repurchase
Payments
Table 9 Participation in Costs and Revenues of Each Partnership
Table 10 Average Oil, Natural Gas Liquids and Gas Sales Prices and
Production Costs for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 and
2000 and the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Table 11 Proved Reserves Attributable to Pioneer USA, Nonmanaging
General Partners and Limited Partners as of December 31,
2000
Table 12 Partnership Estimated Reserves Attributable to Pioneer USA,
Nonmanaging General Partners and Limited Partners as of
March 31, 2001
iii
APPENDIX
--------
Table 13 Oil, Natural Gas Liquids and Gas Production for the Six
Months Ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Table 14 Productive Wells and Developed Acreage as of June 30, 2001
Table 15 Recent Trades of Partnership Interests Per $1,000 Investment
for the Seven Months Ended July 31, 2001 and the Years Ended
December 31, 2000 and 1999
Table 16 Reserve Value Attributable to Pioneer USA, Nonmanaging
General Partners and Limited Partners as of March 31, 2001
Summary Reserve Review of Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. for the
Partnerships as of March 31, 2001..................................... B
Summary Reserve Report of Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. for the
Partnerships as of December 31, 2000.................................. C
Fairness Opinion of Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc. ...................... D
The Merger Proposals.................................................... E
Agreement and Plan of Merger............................................ F
WE HAVE PREPARED A SEPARATE SUPPLEMENT TO THIS DOCUMENT FOR EACH
PARTNERSHIP. EACH SUPPLEMENT INCLUDES:
- A TABLE CONTAINING:
- THE AGGREGATE INITIAL INVESTMENT BY THE LIMITED PARTNERS
- THE AGGREGATE HISTORICAL LIMITED PARTNER DISTRIBUTIONS THROUGH JULY 31,
2001
- THE MERGER VALUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS OF LIMITED
PARTNERS, EXCLUDING PIONEER USA
- THE MERGER VALUE PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT
- THE MERGER VALUE PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT AS A MULTIPLE OF
DISTRIBUTIONS FOR THE PAST FOUR QUARTERLY DISTRIBUTIONS INCLUDING THE
DISTRIBUTION IN JULY 2001
- THE BOOK VALUE PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT AS OF JUNE 30,
2001, AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2000
- THE GOING CONCERN VALUE PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT
- THE LIQUIDATION VALUE PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT
- THE ORDINARY TAX LOSS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT IN YEAR OF
INITIAL INVESTMENT
- INFORMATION ABOUT:
- THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
- THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
- FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, WHICH WE CALL A REPORTING PARTNERSHIP,
THE PARTNERSHIP'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q, INCLUDING MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS,
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001
- FOR EACH REPORTING PARTNERSHIP, THE PARTNERSHIP'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K, INCLUDING MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
- FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP THAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, WHICH WE CALL A NONREPORTING
PARTNERSHIP, THE PARTNERSHIP'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, INCLUDING
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS, FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001
- FOR EACH NONREPORTING PARTNERSHIP, THE PARTNERSHIP'S FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS, INCLUDING MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
- SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA FOR THE PARTNERSHIP FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 AND 2000 AND THE FIVE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
THE SUPPLEMENT CONSTITUTES AN INTEGRAL PART OF THIS DOCUMENT FOR EACH
PARTNERSHIP. PLEASE CAREFULLY READ ALL OF THE SUPPLEMENTS FOR THE PARTNERSHIPS
IN WHICH YOU ARE A LIMITED PARTNER.
iv
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
Q: WHEN AND WHERE ARE THE MEETINGS OF LIMITED PARTNERS?
A: The meetings will be held on December 20, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. at the Dallas
Marriott Las Colinas Hotel, 223 West Las Colinas Blvd., Irving, Texas
75039.
Q: HOW DO I VOTE?
A: After reading this document, please fill out and sign your proxy card. Then
mail your signed proxy card in the enclosed return envelope as soon as
possible so that your partnership interests will be represented at the
special meeting for each partnership in which you own an interest.
Q: WHAT DOES MY GENERAL PARTNER RECOMMEND I DO?
A: The board of directors of the general partner of your partnership
recommends that you vote for the merger and the merger proposals for each
partnership in which you own an interest.
Q: WHAT HAPPENS IF I DO NOT RETURN A PROXY CARD?
A: The failure to return your proxy card will have the same effect as voting
against the merger for each partnership in which you own an interest.
Q: MAY I VOTE IN PERSON?
A: Yes. You may attend the special meeting for each partnership in which you
own an interest and vote your partnership interests in person, rather than
signing and mailing your proxy card.
Q: MAY I CHANGE MY VOTE AFTER I HAVE MAILED MY SIGNED PROXY CARD?
A: Yes. You may revoke your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the
special meeting for each partnership in which you own an interest by
following the instructions on page 67. You then may either change your vote
by sending in a new proxy card or by attending the special meeting for each
partnership in which you own an interest and voting in person.
Q: IF MY PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ARE HELD IN A RETIREMENT ACCOUNT BY A
CUSTODIAN, WILL MY CUSTODIAN VOTE MY PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS FOR ME?
A: Your custodian will not be able to vote your partnership interests. You
should refer to the instructions included on your proxy card to vote your
partnership interests.
Q: SHOULD I SEND IN MY CERTIFICATES FOR MY PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS NOW?
A: No. If the merger of a partnership in which you own an interest is
completed, your certificates representing your partnership interests in
that partnership will be cancelled without further action by you. We will
mail certificates representing Pioneer Parent common stock issued to you on
completion of the merger of that partnership.
Q: AM I ENTITLED TO APPRAISAL OR DISSENTERS' RIGHTS?
A: No. You will not have any appraisal or dissenters' rights in connection
with the merger of any partnership in which you own an interest.
Q: WHAT HAPPENS TO MY FUTURE CASH DISTRIBUTIONS?
A: Since your partnership interests in participating partnerships will be
cancelled upon completion of the merger of each such partnership, you will
not receive any future distributions on those interests. Pioneer Parent's
board of directors did not declare dividends to the holders of Pioneer
Parent common stock during 1999, 2000 or the six months ended June 30,
2001. The amount of dividends, if any, paid by Pioneer Parent in the future
will depend on business conditions, its financial condition and earnings,
and other factors. Pioneer Parent's common stock is publicly traded, so if
you prefer to receive cash you may sell the common stock you receive in the
public markets.
Q: WHO CAN HELP ANSWER MY QUESTIONS?
A: If you have any questions about the merger of any of the partnerships in
which you own an interest, please call Pioneer Parent's information agent,
D.F. King & Co., Inc., at 1-800-848-2998.
v
SUMMARY
To understand the merger of each partnership in which you own an interest
and to obtain a more detailed description of the legal terms of each merger, you
should carefully read this entire document, the related partnership supplements,
and the documents described in "Where You Can Find More Information" on the
inside front cover page of this document. For definitions of oil and gas terms
used in this document, see "Commonly Used Oil and Gas Terms" on page 88.
When we use the terms "Pioneer USA," "we," "us" or "our," we are referring
to your sole or managing general partner, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
including its consolidated subsidiaries and predecessors, unless the context
otherwise requires. When we use the term "Pioneer Parent," we are referring to
Pioneer Natural Resources Company. When we use the term "merger proposals," we
are referring to the proposals to approve the merger agreement, the merger
amendment, the selection of special legal counsel for the limited partners and
the legal opinion of that counsel. When we use the term "participating
partnership," we are referring to each partnership the limited partners of which
approve the merger proposals.
THE MERGERS
Pioneer Parent proposes to acquire each partnership by merging each
partnership into us. We will be the survivor of each merger. The partnership
interests of each participating partnership, other than our interests, will be
converted into Pioneer Parent common stock.
The number of shares of common stock that Pioneer Parent will offer for all
partnership interests of a participating partnership will be based on (1) the
merger value for the partnership as described below and (2) the average closing
price of the Pioneer Parent common stock, as reported by the New York Stock
Exchange, for the ten trading days ending December 17, 2001, three business days
before December 20, 2001, the initial date scheduled for the special meeting for
the partnership. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA determined the merger value for
each partnership primarily based on the present value of estimated future net
revenues from the partnership's estimated oil and gas reserves at March 31,
2001, which was reviewed by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. as of March
31, 2001. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA used the following parameters in
calculating the present value of estimated future net revenues: (1) a five-year
New York Mercantile Exchange, or NYMEX, futures price for oil and gas as of
March 30, 2001, with prices held constant after year five at the year-five
price, less standard industry adjustments, (2) historical operating costs
adjusted only for those items affected by commodity prices, such as production
taxes and ad valorem taxes, and (3) a 10.0% discount rate. For 2001, the oil and
gas prices were based on the average NYMEX futures price for the nine-month
period beginning on April 1, 2001 and ending December 31, 2001. See the table on
page 6 for the NYMEX futures prices. See "Method of Determining Merger Value For
Each Partnership and Amount of Pioneer Parent Common Stock Offered -- Components
of Merger Value For Each Partnership" on page 49 of this document for
information on the basis of pricing. In addition, each partnership's merger
value includes its net working capital as of March 31, 2001, less its pro rata
share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated expenses and fees of the
mergers of all of the partnerships and less the cash distribution mailed on July
13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners. The Pioneer Parent common stock
will be allocated among the partners of a participating partnership based on the
liquidation provisions of the partnership agreement of the partnership.
On pages 4 and 5 of this document is a table that shows important
information about each partnership, including the amount of Pioneer Parent
common stock that will be offered in the merger for each $1,000 of initial
investment for that partnership. For purposes of illustration in this document,
we have calculated the number of shares to be issued based on an assumed average
closing price of $18.00 per share of Pioneer Parent common stock. Prior to
December 20, 2001, the initial date scheduled for the special meeting for each
partnership, we will update the number of shares to be issued using the actual
average closing price of Pioneer Parent common stock for the ten trading days
ending December 17, 2001, three business days before December 20, 2001, the
initial date of the special meeting. You may call D. F. King & Co., Inc. after
December 18, 2001 at 1-800-848-2998 to learn the final number of shares you will
receive.
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA agreed to structure the transaction as a
merger of each partnership instead of as a property sale followed by liquidation
of each partnership because the merger will:
- require fewer legal documents;
- reduce filing fees and other costs; and
- result in the same amount of Pioneer Parent common stock to the limited
partners as would a property sale and liquidation using the same
commodity prices.
Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and the partnerships signed the merger
agreement on September 20, 2001. However, if the oil and gas commodity prices
materially increase or decrease from the prices used in calculating the merger
value for any partnership, Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA might abandon the
proposed merger of the partnership before submitting the merger proposals to the
1
limited partners for approval. In addition, Pioneer Parent may abandon the
proposed merger of any or all of the partnerships at any time prior to the
special meeting for any such partnership for any reason including changes in,
among other things, the price of Pioneer Parent common stock, the market prices
for oil and gas generally or the oil and gas industry generally.
THE COMPANIES
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400
Irving, Texas 75039
(972) 444-9001
Pioneer Parent prepared this document to offer its common stock to you. If
your partnership is merged into Pioneer USA, you will receive common stock of
Pioneer Parent.
Pioneer Parent is a large, independent exploration and production company
with total proved reserves equivalent to 3.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas,
or 628 million barrels of oil at December 31, 2000. Pioneer Parent's proved
reserves are balanced equally between natural gas and oil, and Pioneer Parent
has a reserves-to-production ratio of 14 years. Sixty-seven percent of Pioneer
Parent's proved reserves are in three U.S. areas: the Hugoton gas field, the
West Panhandle gas field, and the Spraberry oil and natural gas field. Pioneer
Parent also has properties in East Texas, the Gulf Coast, and the offshore Gulf
of Mexico as well as in Argentina, Canada, South Africa, and Gabon. Pioneer
Parent seeks to increase net asset value and production by combining lower risk
development drilling with higher-risk exploration activity.
Pioneer Parent's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange and
the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "PXD." See "Pioneer Parent"
beginning on page 75 of this document for more information about Pioneer Parent.
Pioneer Parent files annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy
statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Those SEC filings are available to you in the same manner as each reporting
partnership's information. See "Where You Can Find More Information" on the
inside front cover page of this document.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400
Irving, Texas 75039
(972) 444-9001
We prepared this document to solicit your proxy. We are a 100% owned
subsidiary of Pioneer Parent. We directly own almost all of Pioneer Parent's
United States oil and gas properties.
THE PARTNERSHIPS
c/o Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400
Irving, Texas 75039
(972) 444-9001
The name of each partnership is found in the table beginning on page 4.
Each partnership produces and sells oil and gas. Each partnership was formed to
provide the general and limited partners cash flow from operations and, except
for Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. and Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P., a
one time federal income tax deduction for intangible drilling and development
costs. See the supplement to this document for each of your partnerships for
specific information about the partnership, including the merger value as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly distributions including
the distribution in July 2001. As a result of each partnership's oil and gas
operations, each partnership distributes cash to the limited and general
partners from the partnership's net cash flows. These distributions are made
quarterly, unless sufficient cash is not available.
The partnerships' properties consist of interests in approximately 1,100
oil and gas wells that are located primarily in the Spraberry field of the
Permian Basin of West Texas. We operate approximately 92% of the partnerships'
wells. At December 31, 2000, the partnerships' combined total proved reserves
were 33.6 million barrels of oil equivalent, or MMBOE, consisting of 27.3
million barrels, or MMBbls, of oil and natural gas liquids and 37.6 billion
cubic feet, or Bcf, of natural gas. Approximately 93% of the reserves are
attributable to the limited partners' partnership interests, excluding
partnership interests we directly own. Approximately 81% of the total proved
reserves attributable to the properties are oil and liquids, and 19% are natural
gas, based on six Mcf of gas being equivalent to one Bbl of oil. See "The
Partnerships" beginning on page 77 of this document for more information about
the partnerships.
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks relating to the merger of each
partnership in which you own an interest described in "Risk Factors" beginning
on page 20 of this document. These include:
- The merger value for the partnership determines the amount of Pioneer
Parent common stock you will receive in the merger of the partnership.
2
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA determined each merger value and will not
adjust it for changes in partnership value before the merger is
completed.
- You were not independently represented in establishing the terms of any
merger.
- Our board of directors had conflicting interests in evaluating each
merger because each member of our board of directors is also an officer
of Pioneer Parent.
- Repurchase offers in 2001 by each of the six partnerships with a
repurchase obligation were higher than the merger value for the
partnership.
- Limited partners who become Pioneer Parent stockholders will own stock in
a corporation rather than a limited partnership interest in a limited
partnership, resulting in a fundamental change in the nature of their
investments.
SUMMARY TABLE -- MERGER VALUE AND
AMOUNT OF INITIAL LIMITED PARTNER
INVESTMENT REPAID
The table on pages 4 and 5 contains the following summary information for
each partnership:
- the merger value attributable to:
- Pioneer USA's partnership interests, whether general or limited;
- the partnership interests of the unaffiliated limited partners of the
nonmanaging general partner, if any, of each partnership;
- the limited partners' partnership interests, including the estimated
number of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock offered to the limited
partners other than Pioneer USA;
- for each $1,000 initial limited partner investment in the partnership:
- the estimated number of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock offered;
- the merger value;
- the total historical cash distributions through July 31, 2001; and
- the total amount of initial investment by the limited partners that has
been repaid, after giving effect to the merger of the partnership,
stated in dollars and as a percentage; and
- the reserve value attributable to the limited partners other than Pioneer
USA per barrel of oil equivalent, or BOE.
This information is based on assumptions, including the following:
- Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA estimated the present value of estimated
future net revenues for each partnership from the estimated reserves for
each partnership at March 31, 2001.
- Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA used the following parameters in
calculating the present value of estimated future net revenues: (1) a
five-year NYMEX futures price for oil and gas as of March 30, 2001, with
prices held constant after year five at the year-five price, less
standard industry adjustments, (2) historical operating costs adjusted
only for those items affected by commodity prices, such as production
taxes and ad valorem taxes, and (3) a discount rate of 10.0%.
- Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. reviewed these estimates of each
partnership's reserves as of March 31, 2001. Williamson's review included
testing and evaluating the reserve information for all of the properties
of each partnership. The review is more comprehensive than an audit,
which involves testing and evaluating the reserve information of a
representative subgroup of properties of each partnership.
See "Method of Determining Merger Value for Each Partnership and Amount of
Pioneer Parent Common Stock Offered -- Components of Merger Value for Each
Partnership."
You should read the following table together with the detailed information
in Table 2 and Table 3 of Appendix A to this document, including the footnotes
to those tables. For purposes of illustration in this document, we have
calculated the number of shares to be issued based on an assumed average closing
price of $18.00 per share of Pioneer Parent common stock. Prior to December 20,
2001, the initial date scheduled for the special meeting for each partnership,
we will update the number of shares to be issued using the actual average
closing price of Pioneer Parent common stock for the ten trading days ending
December 17, 2001, three business days before December 20, 2001, the initial
date scheduled for the special meeting.
Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial investment
for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should not assume that
the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the value or amount
attributable to a single unit investment. See Table 1 of Appendix A to this
document for the initial subscription price for each unit.
3
SUMMARY TABLE -- MERGER VALUE AND AMOUNT OF INITIAL LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT
REPAID
MERGER VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED PARTNERS
NONMANAGING -------------------------------
PIONEER GENERAL ESTIMATED
USA PARTNERS NUMBER OF
---------- ----------- SHARES OF
PIONEER
MERGER MERGER MERGER COMMON STOCK
VALUE VALUE VALUE OFFERED(a)
---------- ----------- ------------ ----------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ..... $ 235,285 $ 16,888 $ 653,690 36,317
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. .... 160,791 6,535 526,536 29,252
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ..... 410,553 13,871 868,381 48,244
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. .... 433,854 13,187 1,210,097 67,228
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. ... 305,910 9,927 787,628 43,758
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ..... 962,385 37,202 2,660,522 147,807
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ..... 1,310,513 49,882 3,564,642 198,036
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ..... 1,313,732 55,855 3,741,823 207,880
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ..... 39,179 -- 1,299,886 72,216
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ..... 20,208 -- 1,155,472 64,193
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 85-A, Ltd. ......... 47,872 -- 1,370,151 76,120
Parker & Parsley Selected 85
Private Investment, Ltd. ...... 28,332 -- 1,025,397 56,967
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ..... 23,353 -- 1,716,778 95,377
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ..... 69,533 -- 3,934,914 218,607
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ..... 42,190 -- 3,184,609 176,923
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 86, Ltd. ........... 13,416 -- 1,328,134 73,786
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv.,
Ltd. .......................... 14,805 -- 764,998 42,500
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ..... 92,985 -- 5,713,729 317,430
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv.,
Ltd. .......................... 12,399 -- 1,019,742 56,653
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ..... 51,532 -- 4,166,286 231,461
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. ......... 35,395 -- 2,589,227 143,846
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. ......... 61,106 -- 2,296,689 127,594
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 87, Ltd. ........... 26,261 -- 2,599,862 144,437
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv.,
L.P............................ 21,776 -- 922,941 51,275
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P....... 75,042 -- 3,153,865 175,215
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv.,
L.P............................ 19,347 -- 1,233,237 68,514
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P....... 62,940 -- 3,023,397 167,967
PER $1,000 INITIAL LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED
NUMBER OF DISTRIBUTIONS LIMITED
SHARES OF FROM AMOUNT OF INITIAL PARTNERS'
PIONEER INCEPTION INVESTMENT REPAID RESERVE
COMMON STOCK MERGER THROUGH -------------------- VALUE PER
OFFERED(a) VALUE JULY 31, 2001 $ % BOE
------------ ---------- ------------- ---------- ------- ---------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ..... 5.21 $ 93.68 $ 657.13 $ 750.81 75.08% $3.92
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. .... 4.57 82.20 841.87 924.07 92.41% 3.52
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ..... 4.63 83.32 985.93 1,069.25 106.93% 3.62
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. .... 5.74 103.27 1,141.98 1,245.25 124.53% 4.07
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. ... 6.76 121.71 985.34 1,107.05 110.71% 3.83
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ..... 7.90 142.17 1,328.26 1,470.43 147.04% 3.55
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ..... 8.88 159.87 1,532.16 1,692.03 169.20% 3.56
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ..... 11.06 199.06 1,471.45 1,670.51 167.05% 3.53
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ..... 7.66 137.90 757.31 895.21 89.52% 3.83
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ..... 8.09 145.71 954.81 1,100.52 110.05% 4.01
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 85-A, Ltd. ......... 15.60 280.77 1,131.64 1,412.41 141.24% 4.36
Parker & Parsley Selected 85
Private Investment, Ltd. ...... 12.36 222.43 967.15 1,189.58 118.96% 3.98
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ..... 9.45 170.04 1,369.16 1,539.20 153.92% 3.77
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ..... 12.80 230.38 1,575.72 1,806.10 180.61% 4.17
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ..... 9.19 165.38 1,486.92 1,652.30 165.23% 3.74
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 86, Ltd. ........... 15.00 269.95 1,634.33 1,904.28 190.43% 4.08
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv.,
Ltd. .......................... 11.12 200.21 1,332.03 1,532.24 153.22% 4.08
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ..... 11.08 199.53 1,332.10 1,531.63 153.16% 4.11
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv.,
Ltd. .......................... 11.54 207.73 1,251.46 1,459.19 145.92% 3.91
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ..... 11.55 207.86 1,251.53 1,459.39 145.94% 3.91
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. ......... 11.82 212.75 1,000.38 1,213.13 121.31% 3.92
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. ......... 21.27 382.94 1,127.05 1,509.99 151.00% 4.15
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 87, Ltd. ........... 13.78 248.07 1,575.74 1,823.81 182.38% 4.32
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv.,
L.P............................ 13.70 246.58 1,120.44 1,367.02 136.70% 4.06
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P....... 13.73 247.13 1,120.54 1,367.67 136.77% 4.06
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv.,
L.P............................ 18.95 341.05 1,129.70 1,470.75 147.08% 4.38
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P....... 18.96 341.24 1,129.74 1,470.98 147.10% 4.38
-4-
MERGER VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED PARTNERS
NONMANAGING -------------------------------
PIONEER GENERAL ESTIMATED
USA PARTNERS NUMBER OF
---------- ----------- SHARES OF
PIONEER
MERGER MERGER MERGER COMMON STOCK
VALUE VALUE VALUE OFFERED(A)
---------- ----------- ------------ ----------------
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv.,
L.P............................ $ 13,021 -- $ 996,208 55,345
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P....... 8,602 -- 706,056 39,226
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P........... 35,259 -- 2,053,405 114,079
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 88, L.P............. 35,389 -- 3,503,510 194,640
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv.,
L.P............................ 9,382 -- 928,839 51,603
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P....... 62,877 -- 2,731,848 151,770
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv.,
L.P............................ 23,451 -- 1,761,305 97,851
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P....... 39,784 -- 1,924,144 106,897
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 89, L.P............. 31,687 -- 1,998,362 111,021
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv.,
L.P............................ 9,413 -- 583,543 32,420
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P....... 53,832 -- 1,662,363 92,354
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv.,
L.P............................ 54,557 -- 3,220,716 178,929
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P....... 111,674 -- 8,788,939 488,275
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv.,
L.P............................ 26,279 -- 1,858,388 103,244
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P....... 36,882 -- 2,984,323 165,796
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 90, L.P............. 52,606 -- 3,360,078 186,671
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry
Private Dev., L.P.............. 16,330 -- 1,616,696 89,817
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P....... 65,445 -- 4,665,291 259,183
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P....... 55,026 -- 5,002,516 277,918
---------- -------- ------------ ---------
$6,632,190 $203,347 $106,859,163 5,936,642
========== ======== ============ =========
PER $1,000 INITIAL LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED
NUMBER OF DISTRIBUTIONS LIMITED
SHARES OF FROM AMOUNT OF INITIAL PARTNERS'
PIONEER INCEPTION INVESTMENT REPAID RESERVE
COMMON STOCK MERGER THROUGH -------------------- VALUE PER
OFFERED(A) VALUE JULY 31, 2001 $ % BOE
------------ ---------- ------------- ---------- ------- ---------
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv.,
L.P............................ 16.27 $ 292.92 $ 1,052.80 $ 1,345.72 134.57% $4.31
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P....... 16.17 291.04 1,052.39 1,343.43 134.34% 4.31
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P........... 20.47 368.52 1,234.73 1,603.25 160.33% 4.28
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 88, L.P............. 19.54 351.76 1,185.95 1,537.71 153.77% 4.35
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv.,
L.P............................ 18.45 332.08 1,070.24 1,402.32 140.23% 4.11
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P....... 18.48 332.67 1,070.30 1,402.97 140.30% 4.11
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv.,
L.P............................ 15.56 280.15 931.42 1,211.57 121.16% 4.05
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P....... 15.54 279.80 931.43 1,211.23 121.12% 4.05
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 89, L.P............. 15.81 284.67 800.47 1,085.14 108.51% 4.31
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv.,
L.P............................ 13.83 248.84 909.70 1,158.54 115.85% 4.11
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P....... 13.86 249.45 909.76 1,159.21 115.92% 4.11
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv.,
L.P............................ 15.14 272.55 736.72 1,009.27 100.93% 4.24
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P....... 15.17 273.11 736.80 1,009.91 100.99% 4.24
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv.,
L.P............................ 13.76 247.75 657.33 905.08 90.51% 4.21
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P....... 13.72 247.05 657.33 904.38 90.44% 4.21
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 90, L.P............. 17.11 307.98 823.21 1,131.19 113.12% 4.60
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry
Private Dev., L.P.............. 17.27 310.90 760.35 1,071.25 107.13% 3.78
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P....... 22.39 403.05 854.43 1,257.48 125.75% 4.52
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P....... 24.73 445.11 737.60 1,182.71 118.27% 4.44
---------------
(a) For purposes of illustration in this document, the number of shares of
Pioneer common stock offered is based upon an assumed average closing price
of $18.00 per share of Pioneer common stock.
-5-
NYMEX FUTURES PRICES
The following table shows the NYMEX futures prices for oil and gas as of
March 30, 2001, which Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA used in the calculation of
the reserve value portion of the merger value for each partnership:
DATE OILS ($/BBL) GAS ($/MCF)(1)
---- ------------ --------------
April - December 2001....................................... 26.17 5.18
2002........................................................ 24.36 4.61
2003........................................................ 22.83 4.16
2004........................................................ 22.31 4.09
2005........................................................ 21.97 4.12
Thereafter.................................................. 21.97 4.12
---------------
(1) The NYMEX price for gas is quoted in dollars per million British thermal
units, or MMBTU. We converted those prices to dollars per thousand cubic
feet, or Mcf.
The reserve value portion of the merger value for each partnership was
calculated using a 10.0% discount rate.
EXAMPLE CALCULATION OF MERGER VALUE FOR PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
Merger value for limited partners:
Reserve value (Table 16 of Appendix A to this document)... (1) $ 652,136
Plus working capital value................................ (2) 65,041
Less estimated merger expenses and fees................... (3) (11,675)
Less July 2001 distribution............................... (4) (51,812)
----------
Merger value (page 4 of this document and Table 2 of
Appendix A to this document)........................... (5) $ 653,690
==========
Aggregate estimated number of shares of Pioneer Parent
common stock offered to limited partners of the
partnership before rounding............................... 36,316.11 (5) divided by $18.00
==========
Aggregate estimated number of shares of Pioneer Parent
common stock offered to limited partners of the
partnership rounded up to the nearest whole share......... (6) 36,317
==========
Initial investment:
Initial investment by limited partners (Table 1 of
Appendix A to this document)........................... $7,410,000
Less initial investment by Pioneer USA (Table 6 of
Appendix A to this document)........................... 433,000
----------
Initial investment without Pioneer USA.................... $6,977,000
==========
Number of per $1,000 limited partner investments:........... (7) 6,977
==========
Per $1,000 limited partner investment as set forth in Table
3 of Appendix A to this document:
Reserve value............................................. $ 93.46 (1) divided by (7)
Working capital value..................................... 9.32 (2) divided by (7)
Less estimated merger expenses and fees................... (1.67) (3) divided by (7)
Less July 2001 distribution............................... (7.43) (4) divided by (7)
----------
Merger value.............................................. (8) $ 93.68
==========
Number of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock offered per
$1,000 limited partner investment......................... 5.21 (8) divided by $18.00
==========
For purposes of illustration in this calculation, we have calculated the
estimated number of shares offered based on an assumed average closing price of
$18.00 per share of Pioneer Parent common stock. You may call D.F. King & Co.,
Inc., after December 18, 2001, at 1-800-848-2998 to learn the final number of
shares you will receive.
6
BENEFITS AND DISADVANTAGES TO
THE LIMITED PARTNERS
We believe the merger of each partnership provides the following benefits
to the limited partners of the partnership:
Liquidity. None of the partnership interests of any of the partnerships is
traded on a national stock exchange or in any other significant market. No
liquid market exists for interests in any of the partnerships. Although some
partnership interests are occasionally sold in private or an informal secondary
market for limited partner securities, we believe the potential buyers in such
transactions are few and the prices generally reflect a significant discount for
illiquidity. See Table 15 of Appendix A for historical information about recent
trades of partnership interests in each partnership. Repurchase obligations
exist in only a few of the partnerships and are limited in both amount and price
by formula in the partnership agreements. See Table 8 of Appendix A for
repurchase information.
The merger of each partnership provides liquidity to the limited partners
of that partnership at a price based on oil and gas reserve values, not on
limited market demand for illiquid partnership interests. All limited partners
of a participating partnership will receive Pioneer Parent common stock in
exchange for their partnership interests shortly after completion of the merger
of the partnership. Shares of Pioneer Parent common stock are freely
transferable and listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock
Exchange. On April 16, 2001, the last full trading day prior to the announcement
of the proposed merger of each partnership, the last reported sales price of
Pioneer Parent common stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, was
$17.27. On October 9, 2001, that price was $15.58 per share.
Oil and Gas Investment Vehicle. For those limited partners who do not wish
to liquidate their investment into cash but wish to remain invested in the oil
and gas industry, we believe Pioneer Parent's common stock provides an
attractive oil and gas investment vehicle because:
- Expansion and Balancing of Reserves. The limited partners will have the
opportunity to benefit from Pioneer Parent's efforts (1) to expand its reserve
base through acquisitions and development or exploratory drilling, and (2) to
maintain a strategic balance between oil and natural gas reserves. At December
31, 2000, Pioneer Parent's reserve mix was 50% oil and NGLs and 50% natural
gas compared to the combined partnerships' reserve mix of 81% oil and NGLs and
19% natural gas at such date.
- Geographic Diversification and Large Oil and Gas Reserve Base. Pioneer
Parent's oil and gas reserves are substantially larger and more geographically
diversified than the properties of any partnership individually. This
increased size and the resulting consolidation of operations spread the risk
of an investment in Pioneer Parent over a broader group of assets and reduces
the dependence of the investment upon the performance of any particular asset
or group of assets, such as assets in the same geographical area.
Liquidation Value. The merger value for each partnership is based on the
value of the underlying properties, which we believe is essentially the same
value or a higher value than could be achieved by selling the partnership's
property interests and liquidating the partnership at that time. In addition, we
believe that the value of Pioneer Parent common stock to be distributed to each
limited partner in the merger of each partnership is higher than what the
limited partners would otherwise receive over the life of the partnership,
assuming the same oil and gas commodity prices and operating costs as used to
determine the reserve value for each partnership and giving effect to the time
value of money, for the following reasons:
- The partnership agreement for each partnership requires cash distributions to
be reduced by general and administrative expenses allocable to the
partnership. The merger value for each partnership reflects a liquidation
value that has not been reduced for general and administrative expenses,
although it has been reduced by each partnership's share of the expenses of
the merger, which are estimated to be a total of $2.0 million.
- The merger value for each partnership is based primarily upon the reserve
value for the partnership, which was determined using recent NYMEX futures oil
and gas prices that are, on average, higher than historical oil and gas
prices. It is likely that actual oil and gas prices will vary often and
possibly widely, as has been demonstrated historically, from the prices used
to prepare these estimates. Although future oil and gas prices could be higher
than the prices on March 30, 2001 which were used in calculating the merger
value for each partnership, using a fixed date for determining the merger
value for each partnership eliminates the potential loss in value that could
occur if oil and gas prices decline.
Acceleration of Realization of Value. Pioneer Parent's common stock
provides the limited partners of each participating partnership with liquidity
earlier than if the limited partners remain in the partnership and receive the
expected ordinary cash distributions from oil and gas production. Because each
partnership's properties are mature producing properties, we believe that
production from those properties will continue to decline at the rate predicted
in the partnership's oil and gas engineering reserve reports. Accordingly, cash
distributions from each partnership are also expected to decline, subject to
variation for changes in oil and gas prices.
7
Elimination of Partnership Tax Reports. The merger of each participating
partnership will eliminate the limited partners' Schedule K-1 tax reports for
the partnership for tax years after the merger occurs. This is expected to
simplify the limited partners' individual tax return preparation and reduce
preparation costs.
We also considered the following disadvantages of the merger of each
partnership:
- Limited partners of each partnership will own stock in a corporation, which is
a different investment objective from investing in a partnership designed to
generate recurring cash distributions.
- Limited partners who become Pioneer Parent stockholders will no longer receive
partnership cash distributions.
- Pioneer Parent will engage in the acquisition, exploration and development of
new oil and gas properties that will expose limited partners of each
partnership to all of the attendant risks associated with such activities.
Each partnership owns producing properties and does not conduct drilling
activities. Pioneer Parent's activities may, therefore, involve greater risks
than the activities of each partnership.
- Increases in prices for oil and gas may have a more direct effect on limited
partners of each partnership due to the immediate effect on potential cash
distributions.
- Limited partners who become Pioneer Parent stockholders will be subject to the
volatility of the market value of Pioneer Parent common stock. Market factors
that may affect the common stock price will include factors other than those
that affect the value of a limited partner's interest in a partnership, such
as general market conditions. Accordingly, the price for which a limited
partner may be able to sell the Pioneer Parent common stock received in the
merger may be lower than the value used to determine the number of shares
issued in the merger.
- Limited partners who become Pioneer Parent stockholders may have to recognize
a taxable gain on the transaction.
- Limited partners of each participating partnership will pay their pro rata
share of the expenses and fees to be incurred in connection with the merger of
each partnership. See "Payment of Expenses and Fees" on page 60 of this
document for more information about the aggregate estimated merger expenses
and fees to be incurred.
FRACTIONAL SHARES
Pioneer Parent will not issue fractional shares to any limited partner upon
completion of the merger of any partnership. Instead, Pioneer Parent will round
any fractional shares of Pioneer Parent common stock up to the nearest whole
share.
RECOMMENDATION TO LIMITED PARTNERS
(SEE PAGE 37)
On August 20, 2001, our board of directors unanimously determined that the
merger of each partnership in which you own an interest is advisable, fair to
you, as an unaffiliated limited partner, and in your best interests. Our board
recommends that you, as an unaffiliated limited partner, vote for the merger
proposals for each partnership in which you own an interest. Although our board
of directors has attempted to fulfill its fiduciary duties to you, our board of
directors had conflicting interests in evaluating each merger because each
member of our board of directors is also an officer of Pioneer Parent.
FAIRNESS
In deciding to approve the merger of each partnership on August 20, 2001,
our board of directors decided that each merger of a partnership in which you
own an interest is advisable, fair to you as an unaffiliated limited partner,
and in your best interests based on a variety of factors. These factors include:
- the form and amount of consideration offered to you;
- the comparison of the amount of Pioneer Parent common stock offered in each
merger to the future cash distributions otherwise expected as oil and gas
production continues to decline and general and administrative expenses
continue to be incurred;
- the elimination after the merger of each participating partnership of its
limited partners' tax preparation costs relating to partnership tax
information;
- the belief that the price offered by Pioneer Parent is a competitive price
because of:
- the commodity pricing used in determining the merger value for each
partnership;
- Pioneer USA's position as operator of most of each partnership's wells; and
- Pioneer USA's significant ownership of nearby properties;
- the fairness opinion from Stanger.
FAIRNESS OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR
(SEE PAGE 37)
Stanger has issued a fairness opinion dated August 20, 2001, that, subject
to the qualifications expressed in the opinion, the merger value for each
partnership and the allocation of the merger value of the partnership (1) to
8
the limited partners of the partnership as a group, (2) to the general partners
of the partnership as a group, (3) to Pioneer USA as the managing or sole
general partner of the partnership, (4) to the unaffiliated limited partners of
the partnership as a group and (5) to the unaffiliated limited partners of the
nonmanaging general partner, if any, of the partnership as a group, is fair to
the unaffiliated limited partners of the partnership and the unaffiliated
limited partners of the nonmanaging general partner, if any, of the partnership,
from a financial point of view. The full text of the written opinion of Stanger
is attached to this document as Appendix D. You should read all of it carefully.
THE OPINION OF STANGER IS DIRECTED TO OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS. IT IS NOT A
RECOMMENDATION TO YOU ABOUT HOW YOU SHOULD VOTE ON MATTERS RELATING TO THE
PROPOSED MERGER OF ANY PARTNERSHIP IN WHICH YOU OWN AN INTEREST.
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME
TAX CONSEQUENCES
(SEE PAGE 54)
You will generally recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between
(1) the value of the Pioneer Parent common stock you receive in the merger of
each partnership in which you own interests and (2) your adjusted tax basis in
your partnership interests in that participating partnership. Your gain or loss
will be capital or ordinary depending on the nature of the assets held by each
participating partnership in which you own an interest and the amount of
depletion and intangible drilling and development costs that must be recaptured.
You must calculate your ordinary and capital gain or loss separately for each
partnership in which you own an interest.
TAX MATTERS ARE VERY COMPLICATED. THE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO YOU OF EACH
MERGER OF A PARTNERSHIP IN WHICH YOU OWN AN INTEREST WILL DEPEND ON THE FACTS OF
YOUR OWN SITUATION. WE URGE YOU TO SEEK TAX ADVICE FOR A FULL UNDERSTANDING OF
THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES OF EACH MERGER TO YOU.
CERTIFICATION OF NON-FOREIGN STATUS
YOUR CERTIFICATE THAT YOU ARE NOT A FOREIGN PERSON, WHICH WE CALL A
CERTIFICATION OF NON-FOREIGN STATUS, IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to
vote on the merger of each partnership in which you own an interest, please take
the time to complete and return to us the enclosed certification of non-foreign
status. If we receive a properly completed certification of non-foreign status
from you, we will not withhold federal income taxes on the Pioneer Parent common
stock to be issued to you upon the merger of each partnership in which you own
an interest.
If we, on behalf of a partnership, are required to withhold federal income
taxes from the Pioneer Parent common stock to be issued to you upon the merger
of each partnership in which you own an interest, we will be entitled to deduct
and withhold such taxes from the Pioneer Parent common stock otherwise payable
to you. If amounts are withheld, we may, in our sole discretion:
- sell any Pioneer Parent common stock withheld from you and use the sale
proceeds to pay the required withholding taxes;
- hold any Pioneer Parent common stock withheld from you as security until you
satisfy the required withholding taxes, at which time the withheld Pioneer
Parent common stock will be released to you; or
- take such other reasonable action, at your expense, as is required or
appropriate to satisfy the required withholding taxes.
Any amounts withheld as described above will be treated as having been paid
to you.
RECORD DATE; VOTING POWER
You may vote at the special meeting for each partnership in which you own
an interest if you owned partnership interests of record as of the close of
business on September 21, 2001. We call this date the record date. For each
partnership in which you own a partnership interest, you may cast one vote
representing your percentage of partnership interests in that partnership. The
percentage of partnership interests that you own is determined by comparing the
amount of:
- your, or your predecessor's, initial investment, including any additional
assessments, in the partnership; to
- the total investment of all partners, including any additional assessments, in
the partnership.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the special
meeting for each partnership in which you own an interest, please take the time
to vote by completing and mailing to us the enclosed proxy card. This will not
prevent you from revoking your proxy at any time prior to the special meeting
for each partnership in which you own an interest or from voting your
partnership interests in person if you later choose to attend the special
meeting for each partnership in which you own an interest.
PARTNER VOTE REQUIRED TO APPROVE THE MERGERS
The favorable vote of the holders of a majority of the limited partnership
interests in a partnership is required to approve the merger proposals for that
partnership, except that Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B,
L.P. each require the favorable vote of the holders,
9
other than Pioneer USA, of 66 2/3% of its limited partnership interests to
approve the merger proposals.
We are generally entitled under the partnership agreements to vote
partnership interests we hold as limited partners at the special meeting for
each partnership in which we hold an interest. See "The Special Meetings --
Record Date; Voting Rights and Proxies" on page 66 of this document. We plan to
vote all our partnership interests for the merger proposals. The voting interest
that we hold in each partnership is found in Table 6 of Appendix A.
Except as set forth above and in "Ownership of Partnership Interests" on
page 71 of this document, none of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, or, to the
knowledge of Pioneer USA, any of their directors or executive officers, or any
associate or subsidiary of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA or any such director or
officer, beneficially owns any partnership interests of any partnership or is
otherwise entitled to vote any partnership interests.
If limited partners of a partnership approve the merger agreement, but do
not approve the merger amendment, or vice versa, the partnership will not be
able to merge. LIMITED PARTNERS WHO WANT THEIR PARTNERSHIP TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
MERGER SHOULD VOTE FOR EACH OF THE MERGER PROPOSALS.
CONDITIONS TO EACH MERGER
(SEE PAGE 62)
We will complete the merger of each partnership only if the conditions of
the merger agreement are satisfied or, if permitted, waived. These conditions
include:
- the limited partners' adoption and approval of the merger proposals;
- the absence of any law or court order that prohibits the merger; and
- the absence of any lawsuit challenging the legality or any aspect of the
merger.
So long as the law allows us to do so, Pioneer Parent and we may choose to
complete a merger of any partnership even though a condition has not been
satisfied if the limited partners have approved the merger proposals. Pioneer
Parent and we may complete the merger of any one or some of the partnerships for
which the listed conditions have been satisfied, even if limited partners in
other partnerships do not approve the merger proposals. If we choose to waive a
material condition to a merger, we will disclose that waiver to the limited
partners of the affected partnership and resolicit proxies for that merger.
TERMINATION OF THE MERGER OF A PARTNERSHIP
(SEE PAGE 63)
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA may jointly terminate the merger agreement,
for any or all of the partnerships, at any time, even after limited partner
approval. Either Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA may terminate the merger
agreement for any or all of the partnerships in some circumstances, including
the following:
- the limited partners of a partnership fail to approve that partnership's
merger; or
- if any of the other parties is in material breach of the merger agreement.
In addition, (1) Pioneer USA may terminate the merger agreement for any
partnership, if Pioneer USA determines that termination of the merger agreement
is required for its board of directors to comply with its fiduciary duties and
(2) Pioneer Parent may abandon the proposed merger of any or all of the
partnerships at any time prior to the special meeting for any such partnership
for any reason including changes in, among other things, the price of Pioneer
Parent common stock, the market prices for oil and gas generally or the oil and
gas industry generally.
EFFECT OF DEBT OWED BY A LIMITED PARTNER TO
PIONEER USA ON AMOUNT OF
PIONEER PARENT COMMON STOCK TO BE RECEIVED
BY THE LIMITED PARTNER
If a limited partner is indebted to Pioneer USA for any portion of the
limited partner's original investment in the partnership, Pioneer USA plans to
apply the Pioneer Parent common stock that would otherwise be distributed to the
limited partner upon completion of the merger of the partnership against that
limited partner's indebtedness. If a limited partner's indebtedness to Pioneer
USA is less than the merger value allocated to limited partnership interests
held by the limited partner, the limited partner will receive Pioneer Parent
common stock equal to the amount by which such merger value exceeds such
indebtedness. If a limited partner's indebtedness to Pioneer USA is greater than
the merger value allocated to the limited partnership interests held by the
limited partner, Pioneer USA may collect the deficiency from the limited
partner.
EFFECTS OF THE MERGER OF A PARTNERSHIP
ON ITS LIMITED PARTNERS WHO DO NOT VOTE
IN FAVOR OF THE MERGER
You will be bound by the merger of a partnership in which you own interests
if the limited partners in your partnership vote a majority, or 66 2/3% for
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P., of their
10
partnership interests in favor of the merger, even if you vote against the
merger. If the merger of your partnership occurs, you will be entitled to
receive only an amount of Pioneer Parent common stock based on the merger value
for your partnership interests. You will not have appraisal, dissenters' or
similar rights in connection with the merger, even if you vote against the
merger.
FUTURE OF A PARTNERSHIP THAT DOES NOT
PARTICIPATE IN THE MERGER
(SEE PAGE 57)
If your partnership does not participate in the merger of that partnership
for any reason, that partnership will remain in existence. Some reasons your
partnership might not participate in the merger are (1) that the limited
partners vote against the merger, (2) that a condition in the merger agreement
is not satisfied, or (3) that Pioneer Parent or we exercise a termination right
with respect to the merger for that partnership.
At about the same time that we mail certificates representing shares of
Pioneer Parent common stock to the partners of each participating partnership in
payment of the merger value for that partnership, we will mail any cash
distributions that were delayed for administrative purposes prior to the
completion of the merger of each participating partnership to the partners of
each nonparticipating partnership.
We have not formulated an alternative business plan for any
nonparticipating partnership. The business objectives of each nonparticipating
partnership will continue as they are. We plan to continue to manage each
nonparticipating partnership and operate it in accordance with the terms of its
current partnership agreement. Each nonparticipating partnership will continue
to operate as a separate legal entity with its own assets and liabilities.
Distributions from any nonparticipating partnership are expected to continue to
decline since its production revenues are expected to continue to decline more
quickly than its production costs. Regardless of whether any nonparticipating
partnership distributes cash, limited partners must continue to include their
share of partnership income and loss in their individual tax returns.
The board of directors of each of Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA will
decide what, if any, actions Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA, respectively, will
take regarding any nonparticipating partnership. Potential activities might
include a tender offer for partnership interests of limited partners or a
proposal to acquire the assets of, or merge with, one or more of the
nonparticipating partnerships. The proposal may be on terms similar to or
different from those of the mergers described in this document.
EXPENSES AND FEES
The expenses and fees to be incurred in connection with the merger of each
partnership are expected to be approximately $2.0 million in total. Each
participating partnership will pay its pro rata share, based on its reserve
value, of those estimated expenses and fees. Pioneer Parent will pay the pro
rata share of each nonparticipating partnership's estimated expenses and fees.
Pioneer Parent has also agreed to pay any expenses and fees actually incurred in
excess of $2.0 million and if Pioneer Parent terminates or abandons the merger
as to any partnership, any expenses or fees allocated to that partnership.
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA have reduced each partnership's merger value by
that partnership's pro rata share of the estimated expenses and fees.
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
No federal or state regulatory requirements must be satisfied or approvals
obtained in connection with the merger of any of the partnerships as described
in this document, except filing certificates of merger with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware and the Secretary of State of the State of Texas.
SIMILAR TRANSACTIONS
During March 2001, Pioneer Parent offered to acquire all of the direct oil
and gas interests owned by some former officers and employees of Pioneer Parent
and Pioneer USA in properties in which Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA own
interests. The merger value for the direct oil and gas interests was equal to
the present value of estimated future net revenues from the oil and gas reserves
attributable to the interests, as of March 31, 2001. In determining the present
value, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA used (1) a five-year NYMEX futures price
for oil and gas as of March 19, 2001 with prices held constant after year five
at the year five price, less standard industry adjustments, (2) historical
operating costs adjusted only for those items affected by commodity prices, such
as production taxes and ad valorem taxes, and (3) a 13.5% discount rate. The
consideration offered in the purchases of the direct oil and gas interests was
all cash since offering and registering Pioneer Parent common stock in those
purchases was cost-prohibitive due to the small size of such transactions.
Additionally, in December 2000, Pioneer Parent received the approval of the
partners of 13 employee limited partnerships to merge with Pioneer USA for total
merger consideration of $2.0 million. Of the total merger consideration, $0.3
million was paid to current Pioneer Parent employees. The merger value of each
employee partnership was equal to the sum of the present value of estimated
future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
11
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of September 30,
2000, less the cash distributions on October 15, 2000 and November 15, 2000, by
that partnership to its partners. In determining the present value, Pioneer
Parent and Pioneer USA used (1) a five-year NYMEX futures price for oil and gas
as of August 25, 2000 with prices held constant after year five at the year five
price, less standard industry adjustments, (2) historical operating costs
adjusted only for those items affected by commodity prices, such as production
taxes and ad valorem taxes, and (3) a 13.5% discount rate. The consideration
paid in the mergers of the employee limited partnerships was all cash. Using the
same parameters as described above, Pioneer Parent purchased all of the direct
oil and gas interests held by Scott D. Sheffield, its chairman of the board of
directors and chief executive officer, for $0.2 million during October 2000. As
with the purchases of the direct oil and gas interests described above, offering
and registering Pioneer Parent common stock in those mergers was
cost-prohibitive due to the small size of such transactions.
In each of the transactions referred to above Pioneer Parent paid all of
the expenses of acquiring the direct oil and gas interests and of merging the
employee limited partnerships into Pioneer USA. This is because of the small
size of the transactions and the absence of significant external costs to the
transactions. In the proposed transaction Pioneer Parent will pay the pro rata
share of each nonparticipating partnership's estimated expenses and fees. The
participating partnerships will pay their pro rata share of the expenses and
fees.
THIRD PARTY OFFERS
(SEE PAGE 58)
We will consider any offers from third parties to purchase any partnership
or its assets. Those who wish to make an offer for any partnership or its assets
must demonstrate to our reasonable satisfaction their financial ability and
willingness to complete such a transaction. Before reviewing non-public
information about a partnership, a third party will need to enter into a
customary confidentiality agreement. Offers should be at prices and on terms
that are fair to the partners of the partnership and more favorable to the
unaffiliated limited partners than the prices and terms proposed in the merger
for that partnership described in this document. Pioneer Parent has the right to
match or top any such offer. In addition, any such offer would be subject to our
right to continue operation of the properties. Since first announcing our
willingness to consider third party offers in September 1999, we have not
received any third party offer for any partnership or its assets.
Other than announcing that we will consider third party offers for any
partnership or its assets, we have not actively solicited bids from third
parties.
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE
INFORMATION (SEE PAGE 69)
On April 16, 2001, the last full trading day before the public announcement
of the proposed merger of each partnership, Pioneer Parent common stock closed
at $17.27 per share. On October 9, 2001, Pioneer Parent common stock closed at
$15.58 per share.
No liquid market exists for interests in any of the partnerships. See Table
15 of Appendix A for historical information about recent trades per $1,000
initial limited partner investment in each partnership and Table 7 of Appendix A
for the average historical quarterly cash distributions per $1,000 initial
limited partner investment for each partnership.
12
SUMMARY HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF PIONEER PARENT
The following table sets forth summary financial information of Pioneer
Parent for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and each of the five
years in the period ended December 31, 2000. This financial information was
derived from the consolidated financial statements of Pioneer Parent. This data
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of
Pioneer Parent and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations contained in the reports incorporated by reference in
this document.
SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997(a) 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
(UNAUDITED)
(IN MILLIONS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenues:
Oil and gas..................................... $ 476.6 $ 372.3 $ 852.7 $ 644.6 $ 711.5 $ 536.8 $ 396.9
Natural gas processing.......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- 23.8
Interest and other(b)........................... 16.1 8.9 25.8 89.7 10.4 4.3 17.5
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets, net....... 8.8 3.6 34.2 (24.2) (.4) 4.9 97.1
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
501.5 384.8 912.7 710.1 721.5 546.0 535.3
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production.......................... 107.8 86.3 189.3 159.5 223.5 144.2 110.3
Natural gas processing.......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- 12.5
Depletion, depreciation and amortization........ 109.6 105.5 214.9 236.1 337.3 212.4 112.1
Impairment of properties and facilities......... -- -- -- 17.9 459.5 1,356.4 --
Exploration and abandonments.................... 69.4 40.8 87.5 66.0 121.9 77.2 23.0
General and administrative...................... 18.4 16.7 33.3 40.2 73.0 48.8 28.4
Reorganization.................................. -- -- -- 8.5 33.2 -- --
Interest........................................ 69.9 81.6 162.0 170.3 164.3 77.5 46.2
Other(c)........................................ 27.1 44.8 67.2 34.7 39.6 7.1 2.5
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
402.2 375.7 754.2 733.2 1,452.3 1,923.6 335.0
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes and
extraordinary item............................ 99.3 9.1 158.5 (23.1) (730.8) (1,377.6) 200.3
Income tax benefit (provision).................. (3.0) 1.9 6.0 .6 (15.6) 500.3 (60.1)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Income (loss) before extraordinary item......... 96.3 11.0 164.5 (22.5) (746.4) (877.3) 140.2
Extraordinary item.............................. -- (12.3) (12.3) -- -- (13.4) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Net income (loss)............................... $ 96.3 $ (1.3) $ 152.2 $ (22.5) $ (746.4) $ (890.7) $ 140.2
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
Income (loss) before extraordinary item per
share:
Basic......................................... $ .98 $ .11 $ 1.65 $ (.22) $ (7.46) $ (16.88) $ 3.95
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
Diluted....................................... $ .97 $ .11 $ 1.65 $ (.22) $ (7.46) $ (16.88) $ 3.47
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic......................................... $ .98 $ (.01) $ 1.53 $ (.22) $ (7.46) $ (17.14) $ 3.95
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
Diluted....................................... $ .97 $ (.01) $ 1.53 $ (.22) $ (7.46) $ (17.14) $ 3.47
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
Dividends per share............................. -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ .10 $ .10 $ .10
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
Weighted average basic shares outstanding....... 98.4 99.9 99.4 100.3 100.1 52.0 35.5
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DATA:
Cash flows from operating activities.............. $ 267.1 $ 169.4 $ 430.1 $ 255.2 $ 314.1 $ 228.2 $ 230.1
Cash flows from (used in) investing
activities...................................... $ (227.5) $ (82.9) $ (194.5) $ 199.0 $ (517.0) $ (341.2) $ 13.7
Cash flows from (used in) financing
activities...................................... $ (47.4) $ (82.9) $ (244.1) $ (479.1) $ 190.9 $ 166.0 $ (245.4)
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT PERIOD END):
Working capital (deficit)(d)...................... $ (45.5) $ (29.7) $ (25.1) $ (13.7) $ (324.8) $ 46.6 $ 26.1
Property, plant and equipment, net................ $2,607.3 $2,485.9 $2,515.0 $2,503.0 $3,034.1 $ 3,515.8 $1,040.4
Total assets...................................... $3,062.1 $2,933.2 $2,954.4 $2,929.5 $3,481.3 $ 4,153.0 $1,199.9
Long-term obligations............................. $1,751.9 $1,872.1 $1,804.5 $1,914.5 $2,101.2 $ 2,124.0 $ 329.0
Preferred stock of subsidiary..................... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 188.8
Total stockholders' equity(e)..................... $1,039.0 $ 805.8 $ 904.9 $ 774.6 $ 789.1 $ 1,548.8 $ 530.3
---------------
(a) Includes amounts relating to the acquisition of MESA Inc. and Chauvco
Resources Ltd. in August and December 1997, respectively.
13
(b) The six month period ended June 30, 2001 includes non-cash mark-to-market
gains for changes in the fair values of non-hedge financial instruments of
$7.3 million. 1999 includes $41.8 million of option fees and liquidated
damages related to an unsuccessful asset sale and $30.2 million of income
associated with an excise tax refund.
(c) The six month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998 and 1997 include non-cash mark-to-market
charges for changes in the fair values of non-hedge financial instruments
of $6.6 million, $42.0 million, $58.5 million, $27.0 million, $21.2 million
and $5.2 million, respectively.
(d) The 1998 working capital deficit includes $306.5 million of current
maturities of long-term debt.
(e) On January 1, 2001, Pioneer Parent adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities." In accordance with those provisions,
as of June 30, 2001, deferred hedge gains and losses have increased Pioneer
Parent's stockholders' equity by $49.4 million.
SUMMARY UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA OF PIONEER PARENT
The following table sets forth summary unaudited pro forma combined
financial data of Pioneer Parent that is presented to give effect to the merger
of each of the partnerships. The information was prepared based on the following
assumptions:
- The merger of each partnership will be accounted for as a purchase
business combination under generally accepted accounting principles.
- The income statement data is presented as if the merger of each
partnership had been consummated on January 1, 2000.
- The balance sheet data is presented as if the merger of each partnership
had been consummated on June 30, 2001.
You should consider the following:
- The unaudited pro forma combined financial data are not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations or the financial position of
Pioneer Parent that would have occurred had the merger of each
partnership in which you own an interest been consummated on January 1,
2000, nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations
or financial position of Pioneer Parent.
- The unaudited pro forma combined revenue and expense data exclude the
cost savings expected to be realized through the consolidation of
operations of Pioneer Parent and each partnership and the elimination of
duplicate expenses.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements should be read
together with (1) the historical consolidated financial statements of Pioneer
Parent incorporated by reference in this document, (2) the historical financial
statements of each partnership contained in the supplement to this document for
the partnership, and (3) the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements
contained elsewhere in this document. With respect to future cash distributions,
see
14
"Questions and Answers About the Merger of Each Partnership -- What Happens to
My Future Cash Distributions?" See also "Where You Can Find More Information" on
the inside front cover page of this document.
PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
SIX MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2001 DECEMBER 31, 2000
---------------- -----------------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:
Revenues:
Oil and gas............................................ $ 500,185 $901,382
Interest and other..................................... 16,305 26,231
Gain on disposition of assets, net..................... 8,943 34,425
---------- --------
525,433 962,038
---------- --------
Costs and Expenses:
Oil and gas production................................. 115,003 202,176
Depletion, depreciation and amortization............... 112,909 221,942
Exploration and abandonments........................... 69,585 87,619
General and administrative............................. 22,483 40,406
Interest............................................... 69,876 161,952
Other.................................................. 27,091 67,231
---------- --------
416,947 781,326
---------- --------
Income from continuing operations before income taxes..... 108,486 180,712
Income tax benefit (provision)............................ (3,008) 6,000
---------- --------
Income from continuing operations......................... $ 105,478 $186,712
========== ========
Income from continuing operations per common share,
basic.................................................. $ 1.01 $ 1.77
Income from continuing operations per common share,
diluted................................................ $ 1.00 $ 1.77
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic...... 104,306 105,326
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, diluted.... 105,657 105,710
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT PERIOD END):
Property, plant and equipment, net........................ $2,703,942
Total assets.............................................. $3,169,166
Long-term debt............................................ $1,572,227
Stockholders' equity...................................... $1,146,065
15
SUMMARY OIL AND GAS RESERVE INFORMATION
The following table sets forth summary information on Pioneer Parent's and
the combined partnerships' proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, and
the summary pro forma combined information of Pioneer Parent on proved oil and
gas reserves assuming the merger of each partnership had taken place on December
31, 2000. Pioneer Parent's and the combined partnerships' historical and Pioneer
Parent's pro forma combined proved oil and gas reserve information set forth
below and incorporated by reference in this document are only estimates based
primarily on reports prepared by Pioneer Parent's engineers for Pioneer Parent's
proved reserves and independent petroleum engineers for the combined
partnerships' proved reserves as of December 31, 2000. The reserve information
as of December 31, 2000 is based on the prices of oil and gas as of that time.
The discounted future net cash flows set forth or incorporated by reference in
this document should not be considered as the current market value of the
estimated oil and gas reserves attributable to Pioneer Parent's, the combined
partnerships' or any partnership's properties. Under the applicable requirements
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the estimated discounted future net
cash flows from proved reserves are based on prices and costs as of the date of
the estimate, while actual future prices and costs may be materially higher or
lower.
SUMMARY HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA OIL AND GAS RESERVE INFORMATION
AT DECEMBER 31, 2000
OIL AND NATURAL BARRELS OF
NGLS GAS EQUIVALENTS
(MMBbls) (Bcf) (MMBOE)
-------- ------- -----------
NET PROVED RESERVES (HISTORICAL):
PIONEER PARENT:
Developed.............................................. 232.5 1,507.8 483.8
Undeveloped............................................ 79.8 387.7 144.4
----- ------- -------
Total............................................. 312.3 1,895.5 628.2
===== ======= =======
COMBINED PARTNERSHIPS:
Developed.............................................. 27.3 37.6 33.6
Undeveloped............................................ -- .3 .1
----- ------- -------
Total............................................. 27.3 37.9 33.7
===== ======= =======
NET PROVED RESERVES (PRO FORMA COMBINED):
Developed.............................................. 261.8 1,546.8 519.6
Undeveloped............................................ 79.8 388.0 144.5
----- ------- -------
Total............................................. 341.6 1,934.8 664.1
===== ======= =======
RESERVE VALUATION INFORMATION (IN MILLIONS):
PIONEER PARENT:
Estimated future net cash flows........................ $10,864
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows................................................. $ 5,646
COMBINED PARTNERSHIPS:
Estimated future net cash flows........................ $ 424
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows(1).............................................. $ 207
PRO FORMA COMBINED:
Estimated future net cash flows........................ $11,267
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows................................................. $ 5,838
---------------
(1) The combined partnerships do not reflect a federal income tax provision
since the partners of each partnership include the income of the partnership
in their respective individual federal income tax returns.
16
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
The following table summarizes the per share information for Pioneer Parent
and the per $1,000 limited partner investment for the combined partnerships on a
historical, equivalent pro forma combined and pro forma combined basis. The pro
forma information gives effect to the merger of each partnership accounted for
by Pioneer Parent as a purchase business combination. You should read this
information together with the historical financial statements (1) included in
the annual reports on Form 10-K and other information that Pioneer Parent has
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and (2) included in the
supplement to this document for each partnership. See "Where You Can Find More
Information" on the inside front cover page of this document. With respect to
future cash distributions, see "Questions and Answers About the Merger of Each
Partnership -- What Happens to My Future Cash Distributions?" and "Risk
Factors -- Pioneer Parent Might Not Declare Dividends." You should not rely on
the pro forma combined information as being indicative of the results that would
have occurred had the merger of each partnership been completed on January 1,
2000, or the future results that Pioneer Parent will experience after the merger
of each partnership. In addition, because Pioneer Parent has both a different
legal structure and purpose from each partnership, the information about Pioneer
Parent and the information about the combined partnerships are not necessarily
comparable.
SIX MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
2001 2000
---------------- ------------
HISTORICAL -- PIONEER PARENT:
Income from continuing operations per share:
Basic.................................................. $ .98 $1.65
Diluted................................................ .97 1.65
Book value per share...................................... 10.55 9.19
Cash dividends per common share........................... 0.00 0.00
PRO FORMA COMBINED -- PIONEER PARENT:
Income from continuing operations per share:
Basic.................................................. $ 1.01 $1.77
Diluted................................................ 1.00 1.77
Book value per share...................................... 10.85
17
HISTORICAL -- COMBINED PARTNERSHIPS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT
INCOME BOOK VALUE CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
SIX MONTHS SIX MONTHS SIX MONTHS
ENDED YEAR ENDED ENDED YEAR ENDED ENDED YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
2001 2000 2001 2000 2001 2000
---------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. .................. $11.62 $ 22.18 $ 25.01 $ 20.30 $14.34 $ 19.70
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ................. 7.89 15.34 85.94 84.93 13.20 15.97
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. .................. 12.54 21.14 28.17 23.71 15.47 19.46
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ................. 9.97 20.92 69.35 67.39 13.05 22.04
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. ................ 14.07 32.48 59.63 55.84 17.99 33.51
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. .................. 16.46 35.02 80.97 76.56 20.60 33.80
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. .................. 13.58 36.37 85.77 83.30 19.30 40.34
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. .................. 19.38 46.96 111.99 106.99 26.88 44.87
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. .................. 17.64 39.05 75.25 71.31 23.03 38.71
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. .................. 18.78 34.37 120.38 117.13 25.29 38.72
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A,
Ltd. ....................................... 25.53 52.21 155.76 148.95 35.34 68.91
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private
Investment, Ltd. ........................... 28.01 46.47 120.03 110.65 35.48 46.75
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. .................. 15.10 47.65 54.68 58.31 28.35 45.66
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. .................. 23.94 53.69 134.43 128.81 31.57 53.67
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. .................. 22.50 42.45 104.90 98.36 30.33 42.52
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86,
Ltd. ....................................... 26.53 53.89 187.43 183.56 39.49 55.57
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. ............ 24.48 49.70 120.97 113.34 31.89 53.51
Parker & Parsley 87-A Ltd. ................... 24.47 49.63 121.20 113.60 31.89 53.51
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. ............ 16.42 46.65 138.24 138.95 29.98 49.02
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. .................. 16.42 46.62 138.40 139.11 29.98 49.02
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A,
Ltd. ....................................... 28.57 48.76 97.65 90.89 41.73 50.66
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B,
Ltd. ....................................... 32.04 91.38 140.92 136.41 46.92 96.14
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87,
Ltd. ....................................... 26.82 52.59 152.52 144.05 38.10 55.91
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. ............ 30.29 57.28 160.19 150.71 41.21 62.42
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. .................. 30.31 57.35 160.73 151.23 41.21 62.42
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. ............ 36.61 89.12 152.48 144.77 47.53 86.90
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. .................. 36.64 89.06 152.74 145.00 47.53 86.90
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. ............ 32.79 75.89 150.70 142.82 42.17 75.57
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. .................. 32.66 75.74 148.52 140.76 42.17 75.57
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A,
L.P. ....................................... 31.33 63.02 267.85 263.74 47.97 81.63
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88,
L.P. ....................................... 33.92 78.46 170.44 160.08 43.98 79.82
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. ............ 36.68 75.55 166.00 158.81 50.42 80.13
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. .................. 36.47 75.48 166.58 159.61 50.42 80.13
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. ............ 33.17 68.01 177.67 171.00 45.58 74.44
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. .................. 33.14 67.95 177.79 171.15 45.58 74.44
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89,
L.P. ....................................... 24.05 63.69 161.58 150.75 31.46 65.31
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. ............ 30.64 56.80 194.62 183.97 38.59 63.84
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. .................. 30.60 56.79 195.17 184.56 38.59 63.84
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. ............ 34.01 65.53 166.60 156.33 44.07 69.36
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. .................. 34.04 65.55 166.86 156.56 44.07 69.36
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. ............ 27.83 66.98 139.39 132.75 36.41 65.37
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. .................. 27.82 66.95 138.59 131.96 36.40 65.37
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90,
L.P. ....................................... 34.12 74.42 163.59 156.96 47.93 78.54
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev.,
L.P. ....................................... 38.77 65.85 160.21 141.88 42.84 58.64
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. .................. 41.11 95.06 220.44 206.61 53.70 100.03
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. .................. 34.74 119.17 170.62 160.69 50.09 117.75
18
EQUIVALENT PRO FORMA COMBINED PARTNERSHIPS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNER INVESTMENT
ON AN EQUIVALENT PER SHARE BASIS(1)
ESTIMATED
NUMBER OF SIX MONTHS YEAR ENDED
SHARES OF ENDED DECEMBER 31,
PIONEER JUNE 30, 2001 2000 BOOK VALUE
COMMON ---------------- ---------------- JUNE 30,
STOCK OFFERED BASIC DILUTED BASIC DILUTED 2001
------------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ----------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................................ $ 5.21 $ 5.26 $ 5.21 $ 9.22 $ 9.22 $ 56.53
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ............................... 4.57 4.61 4.57 8.08 8.08 49.55
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................................ 4.63 4.68 4.63 8.19 8.19 50.22
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ............................... 5.74 5.80 5.74 10.16 10.16 62.25
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .............................. 6.76 6.83 6.76 11.97 11.97 73.37
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ................................ 7.90 7.98 7.90 13.98 13.98 85.70
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ................................ 8.88 8.97 8.88 15.72 15.72 96.36
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ................................ 11.06 11.17 11.06 19.57 19.57 119.99
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ................................ 7.66 7.74 7.66 13.56 13.56 83.13
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ................................ 8.09 8.18 8.09 14.33 14.33 87.83
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. ............. 15.60 15.75 15.60 27.61 27.61 169.24
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. ...... 12.36 12.48 12.36 21.87 21.87 134.08
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ................................ 9.45 9.54 9.45 16.72 16.72 102.50
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ................................ 12.80 12.93 12.80 22.65 22.65 138.87
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ................................ 9.19 9.28 9.19 16.26 16.26 99.68
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. ............... 15.00 15.15 15.00 26.54 26.54 162.72
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. .......................... 11.12 11.23 11.12 19.69 19.69 120.68
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ................................ 11.08 11.20 11.08 19.62 19.62 120.27
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. .......................... 11.54 11.66 11.54 20.43 20.43 125.22
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ................................ 11.55 11.66 11.55 20.44 20.44 125.29
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. ........... 11.82 11.94 11.82 20.92 20.92 128.24
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. ........... 21.27 21.49 21.27 37.66 37.66 230.83
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. ............... 13.78 13.92 13.78 24.39 24.39 149.54
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. .......................... 13.70 13.84 13.70 24.25 24.25 148.63
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ................................ 13.73 13.87 13.73 24.30 24.30 148.96
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. .......................... 18.95 19.14 18.95 33.54 33.54 205.58
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ................................ 18.96 19.15 18.96 33.56 33.56 205.69
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. .......................... 16.27 16.44 16.27 28.80 28.80 176.56
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ................................ 16.17 16.33 16.17 28.62 28.62 175.43
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P. ........... 20.47 20.68 20.47 36.24 36.24 222.14
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. ............... 19.54 19.74 19.54 34.59 34.59 212.03
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. .......................... 18.45 18.63 18.45 32.66 32.66 200.18
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ................................ 18.48 18.67 18.48 32.71 32.71 200.52
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. .......................... 15.56 15.72 15.56 27.55 27.55 168.87
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ................................ 15.54 15.70 15.54 27.51 27.51 168.65
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P. ............... 15.81 15.97 15.81 27.99 27.99 171.59
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. .......................... 13.83 13.96 13.83 24.47 24.47 150.00
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ................................ 13.86 14.00 13.86 24.53 24.53 150.37
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. .......................... 15.14 15.29 15.14 26.80 26.80 164.29
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ................................ 15.17 15.32 15.17 26.86 26.86 164.62
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. .......................... 13.76 13.90 13.76 24.36 24.36 149.34
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ................................ 13.72 13.86 13.72 24.29 24.29 148.91
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P. ............... 17.11 17.28 17.11 30.28 30.28 185.64
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev., L.P. ........... 17.27 17.45 17.27 30.57 30.57 187.41
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ................................ 22.39 22.62 22.39 39.63 39.63 242.95
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ................................ 24.73 24.98 24.73 43.77 43.77 268.30
---------------
(1) Represents the "Pro Forma Combined -- Pioneer Parent" amounts multiplied by
the estimated number of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock to be received
per $1,000 limited partner investment for each Partnership.
19
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risk factors in determining
whether to vote to approve the merger proposals for each partnership in which
you own interests.
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
THE MERGER VALUE FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP INVOLVES ESTIMATES THAT MAY VARY
MATERIALLY FROM THE QUANTITIES OF OIL AND GAS ACTUALLY RECOVERED, AND
CONSEQUENTLY FUTURE NET REVENUES MAY BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE ESTIMATES
USED IN THE CALCULATION OF THE MERGER VALUE AND FOR A PARTICULAR PARTNERSHIP
The calculations of each partnership's estimated reserves of crude oil,
natural gas liquids and natural gas and future net revenues from those reserves
included in this document are only estimates. Actual prices, production,
operating expenses and quantities of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves
may vary from those assumed in the estimates. Any significant variance from the
assumptions used could result in the actual quantity of each partnership's
reserves and future net revenues being materially different from the estimates
used in the calculation of the merger value for that partnership. If this turns
out to be the case, the merger value you will receive may not be a reflection of
the actual value of the applicable partnership's reserves.
THE MERGER VALUE FOR A PARTNERSHIP WILL NOT BE ADJUSTED FOR CHANGES IN OIL AND
GAS PRICES BEFORE THE COMPLETION OF ITS MERGER
The merger value for each partnership in which you own an interest
determines the amount of Pioneer Parent common stock you will receive in the
merger of that partnership. The merger value for each partnership is equal to
the sum of the present value of estimated future net revenues from the
partnership's estimated oil and gas reserves and its net working capital, in
each case as of March 31, 2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve
value, of the estimated expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the
partnerships and less the cash distribution mailed on July 13, 2001, by the
partnership to its partners. Although oil and gas prices have fluctuated greatly
in the recent past and may continue to do so, the merger value for a partnership
will not be adjusted as of the closing date of the merger of that partnership to
reflect any general changes in oil or gas prices, or any other matter generally
affecting the oil and gas industry, occurring after March 31, 2001 and prior to
the closing date of the merger.
THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF PIONEER PARENT COMMON STOCK THE LIMITED PARTNERS OF EACH
PARTNERSHIP WILL RECEIVE MAY DECREASE BETWEEN NOW AND THE COMPLETION OF THE
MERGER OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The number of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock to be issued to the
limited partners of each partnership upon the merger of the partnership will be
determined by dividing the merger value assigned to the partnership by the value
of one share of Pioneer Parent common stock determined as described below. As
discussed above, the merger value for each partnership will not be changed
between now and the completion of the merger for the partnership. In addition,
for purposes of example in this document, a share of Pioneer Parent common stock
has been valued at an assumed average closing price of $18.00. However, the
value of a share of Pioneer Parent common stock will be recalculated by
computing the average closing price of the Pioneer Parent common stock, as
reported by the New York Stock Exchange, for the ten trading days ending
December 17, 2001, three business days before December 20, 2001, the initial
date scheduled for the special meeting for each partnership. This recalculated
value, and not the assumed closing average closing price of $18.00 per share of
Pioneer Parent common stock used for illustration purposes in this document and
on each limited partner's proxy card, will be used to determine the actual
number of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock to be issued in the merger of
each partnership. The recalculated value may be more or less than the assumed
average closing price of $18.00 per share of Pioneer Parent common stock. If it
is more than $18.00, you will receive fewer shares of Pioneer Parent common
stock than the illustrations in this document show. For historical and current
market prices of Pioneer Parent common stock, see "Comparative Per Share Market
Price and Dividend Information" on page 69.
CURRENT MARKET PRICES FOR OIL AND GAS MAY BE HIGHER THAN THE MERGER VALUE FOR A
PARTNERSHIP, WHICH MAY AFFECT THE FAIRNESS OPINION
Oil and gas prices have fluctuated greatly in the recent past and may
continue to do so in the future. Pioneer Parent calculated each merger value
based on oil and gas prices that it believes to be fair and that are supported
by current market prices. Changes in current oil and gas prices may affect the
willingness or ability of Stanger to update its opinion at the time this
document is mailed to the limited partners of each partnership as to the
fairness of the consideration to
20
be received by limited partners. If the prices used in the calculation of each
merger value significantly differ from current prices and if Pioneer Parent does
not modify its offer, the fairness opinion provider may be unable to update its
opinion.
YOU WERE NOT INDEPENDENTLY REPRESENTED IN ESTABLISHING THE TERMS OF THE MERGER
OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA determined the terms of the merger of each
partnership, including the method for determining the merger value for that
partnership, and the type and allocation among the partners of the consideration
to be given in exchange for partnership interests. We did not seek
recommendations about the type of transaction or the terms or prices from any
independent underwriter, financial advisor or other securities professional
prior to accepting the consideration Pioneer Parent offered. The only
independent representatives in the mergers were Sayles, Lidji & Werbner, A
Professional Corporation, which provided legal services to Pioneer USA's board
of directors, Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc., which rendered its fairness opinion
to Pioneer USA's board of directors, and Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP and
(as to Texas law matters) Arter & Hadden LLP, which rendered the legal opinion
required under the partnership agreement for each partnership, other than Parker
& Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P. No representative group of limited
partners and no outside experts or consultants, such as investment bankers,
legal counsel, accountants or financial experts, were engaged solely to
represent the independent interests of the limited partners of any partnership
in structuring and negotiating the terms of the merger for the partnership. If
you had been separately represented, the terms of the merger for a partnership
in which you own interests might have been different and possibly more favorable
to you.
THE INTERESTS OF PIONEER PARENT, PIONEER USA AND THEIR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
MAY DIFFER FROM YOUR INTERESTS
The interests of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, and their directors and
officers may differ from your interests as a result of the relationships among
them. For example, Pioneer USA, as general or managing partner of each
partnership, has a duty to manage the partnership in the best interests of the
limited partners. Additionally, Pioneer USA has a duty to operate its business
for the benefit of its sole stockholder, Pioneer Parent. Also, the members of
Pioneer USA's board of directors have duties to both the limited partners of
each partnership and to Pioneer Parent. All of the members of Pioneer USA's
board of directors are officers of Pioneer Parent and have duties to Pioneer
Parent's stockholders. Pioneer USA's board of directors was aware of these
interests and considered them in approving the merger proposals for each
partnership. See "Interests of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and Their Directors
and Officers" on page 70 of this document.
IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE MARKET DEMAND IS FOR ANY PARTNERSHIP OR ITS ASSETS OR
THAT THE TERMS OF THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP ARE AS FAVORABLE AS COULD BE
OBTAINED IN A THIRD PARTY SALE
In September 1999, we first announced our willingness to consider third
party offers to purchase any partnership or its assets at prices that are higher
than the 1999 merger value for the partnership, but subject to our right to
continue operation of the properties. Other than announcing that we will
consider third party offers for any partnership or its assets, we have not
actively solicited bids from third parties. We believed this invitation for
third party bids would result in a better price to the limited partners of each
partnership than if we merely offered the partnership or its assets for sale at
any price. Since that time, we have not received any third party offer for any
partnership or its assets. As a result, we cannot be sure what the market demand
is for any partnership or its assets, individually or as a whole with the other
partnerships, or what a third party would offer for any partnership. Also,
although we do not have any plans to sell or relinquish our operating rights in
any third party sale, we cannot be sure what the market demand is for any
partnership or its assets if we also sold or relinquished our operating rights.
We cannot assure you that the terms of the merger of each partnership are as
favorable as could be obtained from a sale of any partnership or its assets,
individually or as a whole with the other partnerships, to an unrelated party.
POTENTIAL LITIGATION CHALLENGING THE MERGER OF A PARTNERSHIP MAY DELAY OR BLOCK
THE MERGER AND, AS A RESULT, YOUR RECEIPT OF THE PIONEER PARENT COMMON STOCK
One or more of the partners opposed to the merger of a partnership in which
such partner or partners own an interest may initiate legal action to stop the
merger of the partnership or to seek damages for alleged violations of federal
and state laws. Litigation challenging the merger of any partnership may delay
or block the closing of the merger for one or more of the partnerships. In
addition, if any lawsuits are filed, Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA may decide to
terminate one or more of the mergers. If the merger of a partnership in which
you own an interest is delayed, blocked or terminated, we will delay or
terminate the issuance of the Pioneer Parent common stock that you would
otherwise receive.
21
REPURCHASE OFFERS IN 2001 BY EACH OF THE SIX PARTNERSHIPS WITH A REPURCHASE
OBLIGATION WERE HIGHER THAN THE MERGER VALUE FOR THE PARTNERSHIP
The limited partners of each of the partnerships listed below may require
us to repurchase their partnership interests for cash at the times and under the
conditions described in the partnership agreements for the partnership:
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.
The 2001 repurchase offers were commenced and completed before the date of
this document. In each of the partnerships with a repurchase obligation, the
repurchase price in 2001 is higher than the price being offered in the merger of
the partnership. For a list of the repurchase prices in 2001 and the prior two
years, see Table 8 of Appendix A. For a description of the mechanics of the
repurchase rights, see "Special Factors -- Fairness Opinion -- Repurchase
Offers" on page 43.
In addition, if the limited partners of a partnership with repurchase
rights vote a majority of their partnership interests in favor of the merger of
the partnership, those repurchase rights will terminate on completion of the
merger. As a result, if the oil and gas prices used in calculating the
repurchase prices in the future were high enough to offset the additional
33 1/3% discount factor used in the repurchase calculation, the limited partners
would not have the opportunity to require Pioneer USA to repurchase the limited
partners' partnership interests for a price higher than the merger value for the
partnership.
YOU COULD BE BOUND BY THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP IN WHICH YOU OWN AN
INTEREST EVEN IF YOU DO NOT VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE MERGER
You will be bound by the merger of each partnership in which you own an
interest if the limited partners in the partnership vote a majority, or 66 2/3%
for Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P., of their
partnership interests in favor of the merger, even if you vote against the
merger or do not vote. If the merger of the partnership occurs, you will be
entitled to receive only an amount of Pioneer Parent common stock based on the
merger value of your partnership interests in the partnership. Under the laws of
the State of Delaware and the State of Texas, which are the states of formation
of the partnerships, you are not entitled to appraisal or dissenters' rights
with respect to the merger of any partnership.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INVESTMENT IN PIONEER PARENT
LIMITED PARTNERS WHO BECOME PIONEER PARENT STOCKHOLDERS WILL OWN STOCK IN A
CORPORATION RATHER THAN A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST IN A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
RESULTING IN A FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE IN THE NATURE OF THEIR INVESTMENTS
Limited partners of a participating partnership will become stockholders of
Pioneer Parent and will fundamentally change the nature of their investments.
Each partnership, other than Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd., Parker & Parsley
81-II, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd., Parker &
Parsley 82-III, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.
and Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd., was formed as a finite-life investment. The
partners of each partnership receive regular cash distributions out of the
partnership's net operating income and special distributions upon liquidation of
the partnership's oil and gas assets. In contrast, Pioneer Parent intends to
operate for an indefinite period of time and has no specific plans for the sale
of its investments. Because Pioneer Parent will spend a portion of its cash flow
on acquisitions, drilling and other activities, the activities of Pioneer Parent
may involve higher levels of risk than those associated with the present or
future operations of each partnership. Instead of having their investments
liquidated through the liquidation of Pioneer Parent's assets, stockholders
should expect to be able to liquidate their investment in Pioneer Parent only
through the sale of their Pioneer Parent common stock in the market. The amount
realized through the sale of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock may not be
equal to the amount that would have been realized by stockholders through the
sale of Pioneer Parent's assets. For a description of the differences between
the terms of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock and partnership interests in
each partnership, see "Comparison of Rights of Stockholders and Partners" on
page 79.
22
LIMITED PARTNERS WHO BECOME PIONEER PARENT STOCKHOLDERS WILL OWN AN INVESTMENT
THAT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE MARKET RISKS ATTENDANT TO AN INVESTMENT IN A PUBLIC
COMPANY
Limited Partners who become Pioneer Parent stockholders will own an
investment in a public company traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the
Toronto Stock Exchange that does not currently pay a dividend, rather than an
investment in a limited partnership with a limited trading market that pays
regular cash distributions. Limited Partners who become Pioneer Parent
stockholders will therefore be subject to the market risks attendant to an
investment in a public company. An investment in Pioneer Parent common stock
will fluctuate from time to time depending upon general market conditions,
conditions in the oil and gas industry, and Pioneer Parent's future performance.
In addition, there is the potential for decreased market prices for Pioneer
Parent common stock in the near term if significant numbers of limited partners
elect to sell their Pioneer Parent common stock following completion of the
proposed mergers.
PIONEER PARENT MIGHT NOT DECLARE DIVIDENDS
Limited partners of a participating partnership will become stockholders of
Pioneer Parent and will not receive cash distributions or will receive
distributions much smaller than the distributions received from the partnership.
Pioneer Parent's board of directors did not declare dividends to its
stockholders during 1999, 2000 or the six months ended June 30, 2001. The
determination of the amount of future cash dividends, if any, to be declared and
paid is in the sole discretion of Pioneer Parent's board of directors.
LIMITED PARTNERS WHO BECOME PIONEER PARENT STOCKHOLDERS MAY BE DILUTED
If all partnerships participate in the mergers, the shares of Pioneer
Parent common stock to be issued will represent approximately 6% of the shares
of Pioneer Parent common stock outstanding on the date of this document. That
percentage is based upon the number of shares to be issued upon the merger of
each partnership using an assumed average closing price of $18.00 per share of
Pioneer Parent common stock and may increase or decrease depending on the actual
number of shares issued upon the merger of each partnership, which number will
be determined using the actual average closing price of Pioneer Parent common
stock for the ten trading days ending December 17, 2001, three business days
before December 20, 2001, the initial date scheduled for the special meeting.
Because of the increased liquidity afforded to the limited partners of each
partnership after the merger of the partnership, all of those shares of Pioneer
Parent common stock may be offered for sale in a relatively short period of
time, which could result in the price at which shares of Pioneer Parent common
stock trade after completion of the merger of each partnership being less than
the price at which such shares traded immediately prior to the completion of the
merger of each partnership. In addition, limited partners of a partnership who
become Pioneer Parent stockholders will be subject to the risk that their equity
interests in Pioneer Parent may be diluted through the issuance of additional
equity securities. Pioneer Parent has the right to issue, at the discretion of
its board of directors, shares other than those to be issued in the merger of
each partnership, upon such terms and conditions and at such prices as its board
of directors may establish. In addition, Pioneer Parent may in the future issue
preferred stock that might have priority over the Pioneer Parent common stock as
to distributions and liquidation proceeds.
DIVIDENDS PAID TO PIONEER PARENT STOCKHOLDERS ARE TAXED AT TWO LEVELS
Pioneer Parent is taxed on its income, after deduction of expenses, at both
the federal and state levels. Pioneer Parent stockholders, including limited
partners who become Pioneer Parent stockholders, are separately taxed on the
receipt, if any, of dividends.
PIONEER PARENT'S PROFITABILITY IS HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON THE PRICES OF OIL AND GAS,
WHICH HAVE HISTORICALLY BEEN VERY VOLATILE
Pioneer Parent's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of
growth are highly dependent on prices of oil and gas, which are affected by
numerous factors beyond Pioneer Parent's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. If the significant downward trend in oil
and gas prices experienced in 1998, as compared to 2000 and 1999, were to
resume, it would have a material adverse effect on Pioneer Parent's revenues,
profitability and cash flow and could result in a reduction in the carrying
value of Pioneer Parent's oil and gas properties and an increase in Pioneer
Parent's deferred tax asset valuation allowance.
23
PIONEER PARENT'S DRILLING ACTIVITIES MAY NOT BE PRODUCTIVE
Drilling involves numerous risks, including the risk that no commercially
productive gas or oil reservoirs will be encountered. The cost of drilling,
completing and operating wells is often uncertain and drilling operations may be
curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors, including
- unexpected drilling conditions,
- pressure or irregularities in formations,
- equipment failures or accidents,
- adverse weather conditions, and
- shortages or delays in the delivery of equipment.
Pioneer Parent's future drilling activities may not be successful and, if
unsuccessful, such failure could have an adverse effect on Pioneer Parent's
future results of operations and financial condition. While all drilling,
whether developmental or exploratory, involves these risks, exploratory drilling
involves greater risks of dry holes or failure to find commercial quantities of
hydrocarbons. Because of the percentage of Pioneer Parent's capital budget
devoted to exploratory projects, it is likely that Pioneer Parent will continue
to experience exploration and abandonment expense.
PIONEER PARENT MAY BE REQUIRED TO RECOGNIZE NON-CASH CHARGES RELATING TO
UNPROVED PROPERTY COSTS
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, Pioneer Parent carried unproved property
costs of $229.2 million and $257.6 million, respectively. United States
generally accepted accounting principles require Pioneer Parent to periodically
evaluate these costs on a project-by-project basis in comparison to their
estimated value. These evaluations will be affected by
- results of exploration activities,
- commodity price outlooks,
- planned future sales, or
- expiration of all or a portion of the leases, contracts and permits
related to such projects.
If the quantity of potential reserves determined by such evaluations is not
sufficient to fully recover the cost invested in each project, Pioneer Parent
will recognize non-cash charges in the earnings of future periods. During 1999
and 1998, Pioneer Parent recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $17.9
million and $147.3 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of its
unproved properties.
PIONEER PARENT'S GROWTH DEPENDS ON ITS ABILITY TO ACQUIRE OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES
ON A PROFITABLE BASIS
Acquisitions of producing oil and gas properties have been a key element of
Pioneer Parent's growth. Pioneer Parent's growth following the full development
of its existing property base could be impeded if it is unable to acquire
additional oil and gas properties on a profitable basis. The success of any
acquisition will depend on a number of factors, including the ability to
estimate accurately the recoverable volumes of reserves, rates of future
production and future net revenues attributable to reserves and to assess
possible environmental liabilities. All of these factors affect whether an
acquisition will ultimately generate cash flows sufficient to provide a suitable
return on investment. Even though Pioneer Parent performs a review of the
properties it seeks to acquire that it believes is consistent with industry
practices, such reviews are often limited in scope.
IF PIONEER PARENT IS UNABLE TO DISPOSE OF NON-STRATEGIC ASSETS AT ACCEPTABLE
PRICES, THIS WOULD HINDER ITS ABILITY TO MAKE CAPITAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE FOR
MORE PROFITABLE ACTIVITIES
Pioneer Parent regularly reviews its property base for the purpose of
identifying non-strategic assets, the disposition of which would increase
capital resources available for other activities and create organizational and
operational efficiencies. Various factors could materially affect the ability of
Pioneer Parent to dispose of non-strategic assets, including the availability of
purchasers willing to purchase the non-strategic assets at prices acceptable to
Pioneer Parent.
24
THE OPERATION OF NATURAL GAS PROCESSING PLANTS INVOLVES THE POTENTIAL FOR DAMAGE
CLAIMS
As of December 31, 2000, Pioneer Parent owns interests in nine natural gas
processing plants and four treating facilities. Pioneer Parent operates six of
the plants and all four treating facilities. There are significant risks
associated with the operation of natural gas processing plants. Gas and natural
gas liquids are volatile and explosive and may include carcinogens. Damage to or
misoperation of a natural gas processing plant or facility could result in an
explosion or the discharge of toxic gases, which could result in significant
damage claims in addition to interrupting a revenue source.
PIONEER PARENT IS NOT FULLY INSURED AGAINST OPERATING HAZARDS
Pioneer Parent's operations are subject to all the risks normally incident
to the oil and gas exploration and production business, including blowouts,
cratering, explosions and pollution and other environmental damage, any of which
could result in substantial losses to Pioneer Parent due to injury or loss of
life, damage to or destruction of wells, production facilities or other
property, clean-up responsibilities, regulatory investigations and penalties and
suspension of operations. Although Pioneer Parent currently maintains insurance
coverage that it considers reasonable and that is similar to that maintained by
comparable companies in the oil and gas industry, it is not fully insured
against certain of these risks, either because such insurance is not available
or because of high premium costs.
IN THE EVENT OF NONCOMPLIANCE, LIABILITIES UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND
REGULATIONS COULD BE SUBSTANTIAL
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards, such as
oil spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases
that could expose Pioneer Parent to substantial liability due to pollution and
other environmental damage. A variety of federal, state and foreign laws and
regulations govern the environmental aspects of the oil and gas business.
Noncompliance with these laws and regulations may subject Pioneer Parent to
penalties, damages or other liabilities, and compliance may increase the cost of
Pioneer Parent's operations. Such laws and regulations may also affect the costs
of acquisitions.
Additionally, changes in environmental laws in the future could result in a
curtailment of production or processing or a material increase in the costs of
production, development, exploration or processing or could otherwise adversely
affect Pioneer Parent's operations and financial condition. Pollution and
similar environmental risks generally are not fully insurable.
THERE ARE FACTORS OUTSIDE OF PIONEER PARENT'S CONTROL WHICH COULD IMPAIR ITS
ABILITY TO SATISFY ITS DEBT OBLIGATIONS
Pioneer Parent is a borrower under fixed term senior notes and a line of
credit. The terms of Pioneer Parent's borrowings under the senior notes and the
line of credit specify scheduled debt repayments and require Pioneer Parent to
comply with covenants and restrictions. Pioneer Parent's ability to comply with
the debt repayment terms, associated covenants and restrictions is dependent on,
among other things, factors outside Pioneer Parent's direct control, such as
commodity prices, interest rates and competition for available debt financing.
THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY IS HIGHLY COMPETITIVE
Pioneer Parent competes with other companies, producers and operators for
acquisitions and in the exploration, development, production and marketing of
oil and gas. Some of these competitors have substantially greater financial and
other resources than Pioneer Parent.
PRESENT OR FUTURE REGULATIONS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT PIONEER PARENT'S BUSINESS
AND OPERATIONS
Pioneer Parent's business is regulated by a variety of federal, state,
local and foreign laws and regulations. There can be no assurance that present
or future regulations will not adversely affect Pioneer Parent's business and
operations.
PIONEER PARENT HAS INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO INTERNATIONAL
ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL RISKS
At December 31, 2000, approximately 22% of Pioneer Parent's proved reserves
of oil, natural gas liquids and gas were located outside the United States (17%
in Argentina, 4% in Canada and 1% in South Africa). The success and
profitability of international operations may be adversely affected by risks
associated with international activities, including
- economic and labor conditions,
- political instability,
25
- tax laws, including United States taxes on foreign subsidiaries, and
- changes in the value of the United States dollar versus the local
currency.
To the extent that Pioneer Parent is involved in international activities,
changes in exchange rates may adversely affect Pioneer Parent's consolidated
revenues and expenses, as expressed in United States dollars.
NUMEROUS UNCERTAINTIES EXIST IN ESTIMATING PIONEER PARENT'S QUANTITIES OF PROVED
RESERVES AND FUTURE NET REVENUES
Estimates of proved reserves and related future net revenues are based on
various assumptions which may prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, those estimates
should not be construed as being accurate estimates of the current market value
of Pioneer Parent's proved reserves.
26
SPECIAL FACTORS
BACKGROUND OF THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
The partnerships were formed from 1981 through 1991 under the sponsorship
of various affiliated companies collectively known as Parker & Parsley. On
February 19, 1991, Parker & Parsley's principal company converted from limited
partnership form to corporate form and acquired most of the assets of five oil
and gas limited partnerships. The new corporation was called Parker & Parsley
Petroleum Company, and it owned the sole or managing general partners of the
partnerships.
In early 1992, Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company decided that it could not
fully realize the benefits of the properties it had acquired while continuing to
devote substantial resources to the sponsorship of and drilling for
partnerships. It stopped sponsoring oil and gas development drilling and income
partnerships and focused on its corporate development. In 1997, Parker & Parsley
Petroleum Company and MESA Inc. combined their businesses in a merger that
created Pioneer Natural Resources Company. That same year, Pioneer Parent
combined many of its U.S. subsidiaries, including the managing or sole general
partner of each of the partnerships, into its main subsidiary, Pioneer USA.
From time to time since 1992, Pioneer Parent and its predecessors have had
general, internal discussions about whether to consolidate each partnership
pursuant to a merger or similar transaction with each partnership. On several
occasions, Pioneer Parent or its predecessors engaged outside legal counsel and
had discussions with investment banks about a possible combination with each of
the partnerships. Some of those discussions were with Stanger. The contemplated
structure of the combination has varied significantly during these internal
discussions and has included issuances of common stock, combinations of common
stock and cash, and cash-only transactions through asset sales, mergers, tender
offers, and combinations of those types of transactions. See "Special
Factors -- Reasons for the Merger of Each Partnership" for a discussion of why
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA selected the proposed transaction. In general,
the contemplated transactions would have been taxable to the limited partners of
each partnership because of the difficulties involved in structuring a tax-free
transaction for the partnership. Until 1999, every time Pioneer Parent or its
predecessors considered such a transaction, it decided not to complete the
transaction. The reasons Pioneer Parent and its predecessors did not previously
complete a transaction varied. In some early cases, they wanted to collect and
fully distribute proceeds to the limited partners of each partnership from
litigation against an oilfield services company before trying to value any
partnership. In other cases, they wanted to avoid periods of volatility in oil
and gas prices or in Pioneer Parent's stock price. On several occasions, Pioneer
Parent was involved in other corporate transactions that could not be completed
on schedule if a transaction with each partnership was also pending.
In early 1998, Pioneer Parent was formulating a strategic plan to focus on
its 25 core area oil and gas fields and to eliminate ancillary operations.
Pioneer Parent began discussions internally to consider a transaction involving
each partnership, including the basis for valuing each partnership and whether
the consideration should be Pioneer Parent common stock, cash or some
combination of both.
During the second quarter of 1998, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA began to
discuss the methods for valuing each partnership. At that time, the board of
directors of Pioneer USA engaged Sayles, Lidji & Werbner, A Professional
Corporation (then known as Sayles & Lidji, A Professional Corporation) based in
Dallas, Texas, as its independent legal counsel to assist the board in
evaluating a potential transaction with Pioneer Parent. Pioneer USA's board also
engaged Stanger as its financial advisor to review any proposed transaction and
to render an opinion as to the fairness of the offer price, from a financial
point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of each partnership. In May
1998, Pioneer Parent submitted an offer to merge each partnership into Pioneer
USA using Pioneer Parent common stock or a combination of Pioneer Parent common
stock and cash. The pricing for that offer was primarily based on oil and gas
prices and the present value of estimated future net revenues from each
partnership's oil and gas reserves, in each case as of December 31, 1997. The
present value of estimated future net revenues was determined in accordance with
the SEC's reporting convention that provides a common basis for comparing oil
and gas companies and requires the use of oil and gas prices as of the date of
computation, but using a 15% discount rate. After some negotiation with Pioneer
USA, Pioneer Parent withdrew the May 1998 offer due to the decline in oil
prices. In July 1998, Pioneer Parent submitted a second offer using Pioneer
Parent common stock, or at its option upon the occurrence of specified events, a
combination of Pioneer Parent common stock and cash. The oil and gas pricing for
the second offer was lower than the pricing in the May 1998 offer due to the
continued decline in oil prices, but the discount rate for the second offer was
the same as the
27
May 1998 offer. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA decided to discontinue further
discussions and not to submit the proposed transaction to the limited partners
of any partnership because of:
- the continued decline in oil prices, which in turn would reduce any
merger value to be paid to the limited partners of each partnership;
- the decline in Pioneer Parent's stock price; and
- the tight lending environment for many oil and gas companies, including
Pioneer Parent.
As oil and gas prices improved, in June 1999, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer
USA again began discussions internally to consider a transaction involving each
partnership. At that time, Scott Sheffield, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Pioneer Parent, contacted members of Pioneer USA's board regarding
consideration of a potential transaction involving each partnership. Pioneer
Parent did not submit a written offer to Pioneer USA at that time.
During the second quarter of 1999, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA attempted
to formally address the conflicting interests inherent in the relationships
among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, each partnership and the officers and
directors of Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA caused Scott D.
Sheffield to resign from Pioneer USA's board of directors because he is also a
member of Pioneer Parent's board of directors. He was not replaced. Pioneer USA
did not consider replacing Mr. Sheffield with an unaffiliated director because
Pioneer USA is a 100% subsidiary of Pioneer Parent and typically such
wholly-owned subsidiaries do not have unaffiliated directors. Because all of the
board members of Pioneer USA are also employees of Pioneer Parent, an inherent
conflict exists with respect to their duties to the limited partners of each
partnership in their capacity as directors of Pioneer USA, on the one hand, and
their duties to Pioneer Parent as employees, on the other hand.
Shortly thereafter, Pioneer USA's board again engaged Sayles, Lidji &
Werbner to advise the board in connection with a proposed transaction with
Pioneer Parent and any other alternative transaction that the board determined
was worth consideration.
Pioneer USA's board also engaged, on behalf of each partnership, Stanger,
as its financial advisor to advise the board on the fairness from a financial
point of view of the merger value for each partnership to be paid to the
unaffiliated limited partners in the partnership for the limited partnership
interests in the partnership and to assist in Pioneer USA's evaluation of the
merger transaction and other strategic alternatives. Stanger was familiar with
the circumstances from its 1998 engagement.
On July 14, 1999, Pioneer USA's board met with its counsel and Stanger to
discuss the proposed merger of each partnership. Stanger presented an overview
of the analysis it planned to perform in evaluating the fairness of the proposed
transaction. Stanger advised Pioneer USA's board that Stanger would review the
following for each partnership:
- the reserve report to be prepared by Williamson Petroleum Consultants,
Inc. as of September 30, 1999;
- the most recent quarterly financial statements;
- the estimated cash distributions;
- the estimated net asset value, going concern value and liquidation value;
- secondary market prices;
- tender offers; and
- repurchase offers.
Sayles, Lidji & Werbner then reviewed and discussed with the board the
procedures that would be involved in completing the proposed transaction with
Pioneer Parent. The discussion topics included:
- the process in which Pioneer USA's board of directors would approve the
proposed transaction;
- the submission of the proposed merger of each partnership to the limited
partners of the partnership for approval;
- the evaluation of offers from third parties;
- the application of and compliance with the requirements of the federal
securities laws; and
- the timing of the proposed transaction.
28
Members of the Pioneer USA board met informally on several occasions during
July and early August to discuss among each other the proposed terms of the
merger transaction and other potential alternative transactions, including the
formation of a royalty trust or a master limited partnership.
On August 16, 1999, at a special meeting of the Pioneer USA board, the
board met with representatives of Sayles, Lidji & Werbner and Stanger to discuss
the proposed merger of each partnership into Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA's board
discussed with the representatives of Stanger and Sayles, Lidji & Werbner the
proposed terms of the offer expected from Pioneer Parent, including the expected
pricing parameters of $18 per Bbl of oil and $2.40 per Mcf of gas and the
expected timing of receipt of Pioneer Parent's formal written offer. Stanger
discussed the progress it was making on its financial analysis of each
partnership and its determination of the fairness from a financial point of view
of the merger value for each partnership to be paid in cash for the limited
partners' interests in the partnership. Stanger's discussion centered on (1) the
price to be paid for the oil and gas reserves, (2) the discount rate, (3) the
application of overhead charges and administrative charges, and (4) the
responsibility for any transaction expenses. Following this discussion, the
board and its counsel discussed the board's fiduciary duties in evaluating the
proposed transaction with Pioneer Parent and the making of a recommendation to
the unaffiliated limited partners. Finally, the board decided to request that
Pioneer Parent make a formal written offer outlining the terms of the proposed
merger transaction.
On August 17, 1999, in response to Pioneer USA's request for a written
offer, Pioneer Parent delivered to Pioneer USA's board a written proposal which
outlined the terms of the proposed merger transaction. The written offer
specified that the pricing for the oil and gas reserves would be based on 95% of
the arithmetic average of a four-year or five-year NYMEX futures price. The
future cash flows generated by this pricing structure would then be discounted
using a 15% discount rate. At a special meeting that day of Pioneer USA's board,
the board, its counsel and Stanger met to discuss the specifics of Pioneer
Parent's offer, including oil and gas pricing, the present value discount rate,
the right to allow others to bid on the property, and the costs of the merger of
each partnership. Following the board meeting, Pioneer USA's directors
determined that it would be advantageous to each partnership to seek more
favorable pricing terms and a lower discount rate. Thus, the board decided to
continue discussions of the written offer.
On August 23, 1999, at a special meeting of Pioneer USA's board, the board
updated its counsel and Stanger on the status of its discussions with Pioneer
Parent. As a result of continued discussions, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA
agreed, in response to requests by Stanger, (1) to reduce the discount rate from
15% to 12.5%, (2) to increase the pricing of the oil reserves from 95% of the
arithmetic average of a four-year or five-year NYMEX futures price to 100% of
the arithmetic average of the five-year NYMEX futures price, (3) to a fixed
price of $2.40 per Mcf of gas instead of a floating NYMEX futures price and (4)
to allocate the merger expenses and fees to each participating partnership.
On September 2, 1999, at a special meeting of Pioneer USA's board, the
board and representatives of Stanger and Sayles, Lidji & Werbner reviewed the
terms of a revised proposal submitted by Pioneer Parent which incorporated these
changes. The parties discussed the revised terms of the merger of each
partnership and the strategic rationale for and benefits of the merger of each
partnership. At this meeting, Stanger reviewed with the board its financial
analysis and its evaluation of the merger consideration and the feasibility of
other strategic alternatives. Stanger also orally presented to the board the
status of its findings and its preliminary evaluation of the proposed
transaction.
After considering Stanger's evaluation of the proposed merger transaction,
Pioneer USA's board, together with representatives of Stanger, engaged in a
general discussion of other possible transactions it had considered over the
last six to eight months. This discussion included anticipated ongoing
operations of each partnership under its current structure and the operation of
each partnership through a master limited partnership structure, as well as
through a royalty trust. The board discussed selling the oil and gas properties
of each partnership at auction and potentially soliciting other buyers or merger
partners. The board also considered the fact that other potential buyers of each
partnership would have an opportunity to make an offer for each partnership
before the board submitted the merger transaction to the limited partners of
each partnership for their consideration and approval.
At a special meeting held on September 8, 1999, Pioneer USA's board
continued discussions with Sayles, Lidji & Werbner and Stanger regarding the
merger proposals for each partnership. After considering the alternatives
discussed in the preceding paragraph, including the advantages and disadvantages
of each, the board concluded that none of the alternatives was more advantageous
to the limited partners of any partnership than the terms of the proposed merger
of the partnership. The board then unanimously approved proceeding with the
merger of each partnership, subject to determination of September 30, 1999
pricing, its receipt of Stanger's fairness opinion, and the board's
determination that the merger consideration of each partnership is fair to the
unaffiliated limited partners of that partnership based on all circumstances as
of September 30, 1999, including without limitation, the then current market
conditions and the existence, if any, of any other proposal for the partnership
on terms more favorable to the limited partners.
29
On September 8, 1999, in connection with the proposed merger transaction,
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA filed a preliminary proxy statement and
preliminary Schedule 13e-3s with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In
addition, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA publicly announced the proposed merger
of each partnership. In that announcement, Pioneer USA also announced that it
would consider proposals from other potential buyers of one or more of the
partnerships.
On or about October 19, 1999, Pioneer Parent submitted a verbal offer to
Pioneer USA to revise the oil reserve component of the pricing used in the
preliminary proxy statement to $18.35 per Bbl of oil. On or about November 3,
1999, Pioneer Parent submitted a second verbal offer to Pioneer USA to further
revise the oil reserve pricing to $18.40 per Bbl of oil. Later that month, due
to the increase in oil and gas prices over the previous several months and in
response to a request from Pioneer USA, Pioneer Parent proposed to Pioneer USA
that the merger value calculation for each partnership be further modified (1)
to increase the pricing to $18.90 per Bbl for oil and $2.55 per Mcf of gas and
(2) to increase the discount rate to 15%.
On November 17, 1999, in connection with the approval of Pioneer Parent's
capital budget for 2000, Pioneer Parent's board of directors met and voted to
approve the merger of each partnership and to proceed with the completion of
each merger, subject to the pricing information and other relevant conditions at
the time.
At a special board meeting held on November 22, 1999, Pioneer USA's board
of directors met with representatives from Stanger and Sayles, Lidji & Werbner
to discuss Pioneer Parent's proposed pricing. Pioneer USA's board agreed that an
increase in the merger value for each partnership based on Pioneer Parent's
proposed pricing was warranted to more closely reflect the current oil and gas
prices. Similarly, in view of increases in interest rates during the months
since the original proposal was made and in view of the volatility of oil and
gas prices over the previous year, Pioneer USA's board agreed to increase the
discount rate used to determine the merger value for each partnership from 12.5%
to 15%. Pioneer USA's board reported that management had worked to reduce the
expected merger expenses and fees from an estimated $4.6 million to an estimated
$1.8 million, thereby increasing the merger value for each partnership to be
received by the limited partners of the partnership. The board also received a
status report on whether or not any third party offers had been received since
September 8, 1999, the date on which Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA announced
that it would consider such offers. In that regard, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer
USA had not received any formal offers, but did receive a few inquiries from
third parties expressing an interest in possibly making a bid on one or more of
the partnerships or the assets of one or more of the partnerships. The nature of
the inquiries was to understand the structure and pricing of the transaction
proposed by Pioneer and Pioneer USA. None of the third parties who made
inquiries (1) specified any terms, (2) made any offer or (3) have pursued the
matter further. The board then voted to extend the period it would be willing to
consider third party offers from November 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999. Stanger
then reviewed for the board Stanger's analysis of the fairness of the merger
transaction using the new terms agreed to by Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA.
Stanger expressed its preliminary view that the revised merger value for each
partnership to be paid in cash for the limited partnership interests in each
partnership would be fair from a financial point of view to the unaffiliated
limited partners of the partnership under recent market conditions, but stated
that whether or not the transaction would be considered fair by Stanger at the
time its fairness opinion was sought would depend on market conditions at that
time. Following this discussion, the board approved proceeding with the merger
of each partnership on the new terms, subject to (1) its receipt of a fairness
opinion from Stanger, and (2) its determination that the merger value to be paid
in cash for the limited partnership interests in each partnership is fair to the
unaffiliated limited partners of the partnership based on all circumstances,
including without limitation, the then current market conditions and the
existence, if any, of any other proposal for such partnership or its assets on
terms more favorable to the unaffiliated limited partners than the proposed
merger transaction.
In December 1999, Pioneer Parent became involved in discussions with an
independent oil and gas company similar in size to Pioneer Parent relating to a
corporate merger opportunity. Those discussions required the dedicated time and
attention of Pioneer Parent's management. The corporate merger opportunity
subsequently failed to come to fruition. Meanwhile, during December 1999 and the
first quarter of 2000, oil and gas prices continued to increase. As a result,
during the first quarter of 2000, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA began to
discuss revising the pricing terms of the proposed merger transaction to (1) an
arithmetic average of the five-year NYMEX futures price for oil and for gas and
(2) a 15% discount rate. Pioneer Parent also proposed to offer Pioneer Parent
common stock instead of cash to the limited partners of each participating
partnership. In April 2000, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA discontinued these
discussions and did not submit the proposed merger transaction to the limited
partners of any partnership because of:
- the decline in Pioneer Parent's stock price;
- the increase in interest rates; and
- Pioneer Parent's involvement in replacing existing debt with new
publicly-held debt and a new credit facility.
30
In September 2000, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA began internal
discussions to consider a merger transaction involving 13 privately-held
employee limited partnerships. Pioneer Parent offered to pay an amount of cash
to the limited partners of each participating partnership equal to the sum of
the present value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's
estimated oil and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of
September 30, 2000, less the cash distributions on October 15, 2000 and November
15, 2000, by the partnership to its partners. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA
calculated the present value of the estimated future net revenues from each
partnership's estimated oil and gas reserves using (1) a five-year NYMEX futures
price for oil and gas as of August 25, 2000, with prices held constant after
year five at the year five price, less standard industry adjustments, (2)
historical operating costs adjusted only for those items affected by commodity
prices, such as production taxes and ad valorem taxes, and (3) a 13.5% discount
rate. Pioneer Parent also agreed to bear the merger expenses and fees. Using the
same parameters as described above, Pioneer Parent purchased all of the direct
oil and gas interests held by Scott D. Sheffield, its chairman of the board of
directors and chief executive officer, for $0.2 million during October 2000. The
consideration paid in the mergers of the employee limited partnerships and in
the purchase of the direct oil and gas interests was all cash since offering and
registering Pioneer Parent common stock in those transactions was
cost-prohibitive due to the small size of such transactions. In December 2000,
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA completed the merger of each of the 13
privately-held employee limited partnerships with and into Pioneer USA.
In October 2000, Pioneer Parent terminated the preliminary proxy statement
and preliminary Schedule 13e-3s filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 8, 1999 in connection with the proposed merger
transaction.
As oil and gas prices continued to improve, in January 2001, Pioneer Parent
and Pioneer USA renewed their internal discussions to consider a transaction
involving each of the partnerships described in this document. For a discussion
of why Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA selected the proposed merger transaction,
see "Alternative Transactions to the Merger of Each Partnership" beginning on
page 46. Pioneer Parent offered a combination of its common stock and cash.
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA agreed on a merger value for each participating
partnership equal to the sum of the present value of estimated future net
revenues from the partnership's estimated oil and gas reserves and its net
working capital, in each case as of March 31, 2001. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer
USA agreed to calculate the present value of the estimated future net revenues
from each partnership's estimated oil and gas reserves using (1) a five-year
NYMEX futures price for oil and gas as of March 30, 2001, with prices held
constant after year five at the year five price, less standard industry
adjustments, (2) historical operating costs adjusted only for those items
affected by commodity prices, such as production taxes and ad valorem taxes, and
(3) a 13.5% discount rate. For 2001, the oil and gas prices would be based on
the average NYMEX futures price for the nine-month period beginning on April 1,
2001 and ending December 31, 2001. Pioneer Parent also agreed to bear the merger
expenses and fees.
On February 15, 2001, Pioneer Parent's board of directors met and
authorized its officers to communicate its offer to the board of directors of
Pioneer USA, as general partner of the partnerships, and to negotiate the terms
of the mergers with Pioneer USA. Pioneer Parent's board of directors also voted
to approve the merger of each partnership into its subsidiary Pioneer USA, the
issuance of Pioneer Parent common stock and the payment of cash upon each such
merger, and to otherwise proceed with the completion of each merger, subject to
the pricing information and other relevant conditions at the time.
During March 2001, Pioneer Parent offered to acquire all of the direct oil
and gas interests owned by some former officers and employees of Pioneer Parent
and Pioneer USA in properties in which Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA own
interests. The merger value for the direct oil and gas interests was equal to
the present value of estimated future net revenues from the oil and gas reserves
attributable to the interests, as of March 31, 2001. In determining the present
value, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA used (1) a five-year NYMEX futures price
for oil and gas as of March 19, 2001 with prices held constant after year five
at the year five price, less standard industry adjustments, (2) historical
operating costs adjusted only for those items affected by commodity prices, such
as production taxes and ad valorem taxes, and (3) a 13.5% discount rate. The
consideration offered in the purchases of the direct oil and gas interests was
all cash since offering and registering Pioneer Parent common stock in those
purchases was cost-prohibitive due to the small size of such transactions.
In April 2001, Pioneer USA contacted Sayles, Lidji & Werbner and Stanger to
advise them of the proposed merger transaction, pricing terms and merger
consideration.
On April 9, 2001, Pioneer USA's board met with Sayles, Lidji & Werbner to
discuss the proposed merger of each partnership into Pioneer USA. The board
members reviewed the terms of the merger transaction, including the pricing
terms, the merger consideration and the terms and conditions of the proposed
merger agreement. The board members also discussed the engagement of special
legal counsel to render the legal opinion required by each partnership's
partnership
31
agreement. Finally, Pioneer USA's board discussed the fairness opinion to be
delivered by Stanger and decided to hold another board meeting at which Stanger
would present in detail its methodology in determining that the merger value for
each partnership and the allocation of the merger value of each partnership (1)
to the limited partners of each partnership as a group, (2) to the general
partners of each partnership as a group, (3) to Pioneer USA as the managing or
sole general partner of each partnership, (4) to the unaffiliated limited
partners of each partnership as a group and (5) to the unaffiliated limited
partners of the nonmanaging general partner, if any, of each partnership as a
group, is fair to the unaffiliated limited partners of each partnership and the
unaffiliated limited partners of the nonmanaging general partner, if any, of
each partnership, from a financial point of view. The board decided to proceed
with the merger transaction, but would withhold recommending the merger
transaction to the limited partners or executing the merger agreement until it
received the fairness opinion from Stanger and determined that the merger of
each partnership is advisable, fair to the unaffiliated limited partners and in
the unaffiliated limited partners' best interests.
On April 17, 2001, in connection with the proposed merger transaction,
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA filed a registration statement on Form S-4 and
preliminary Schedule 13e-3s with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In
addition, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA publicly announced the proposed merger
of each partnership. In that announcement, Pioneer USA also announced that it
would continue to consider proposals from other potential buyers of any
partnership or its assets.
On or about April 30, 2001, Stanger contacted members of Pioneer USA's
board and expressed concern regarding the pricing terms of the merger
transaction which Stanger had received during the week ended April 15, 2001.
Based on Stanger's updated analysis of the new pricing terms for the merger
transaction, Stanger questioned whether the merger value was fair to the
unaffiliated limited partners of the partnerships and the unaffiliated limited
partners of the nonmanaging general partners of the partnerships from a
financial point of view. Stanger's updated analysis included (i) an analysis of
reserve values under six alternative pricing cases and discount rate
assumptions, (ii) a review of reserve pricing parameters, (iii) a summary of
selected recent reserve acquisition transactions, (iv) a review of the trading
history, net asset value estimates and projected cash flow for Pioneer Parent,
and (v) a review of the revised offer price per $1,000 investment in each
partnership and a comparison to such partnership's net asset value, going
concern value, liquidation value, secondary market price, tender offers and
repurchase offers, as applicable. After discussions between members of Pioneer
USA's board and Stanger to discuss pricing terms which Stanger and the Pioneer
USA board believed would be fair to the unaffiliated limited partners of the
partnerships and the unaffiliated limited partners of the nonmanaging general
partners of the partnerships from a financial point of view, the Pioneer USA
board requested that Stanger meet with Pioneer Parent to discuss the issue.
Stanger met with officers of Pioneer Parent on June 15, 2001, to discuss
Stanger's concerns about the proposed pricing terms of the mergers and the need
for new pricing terms that were more favorable to the partnerships in order to
support a fairness opinion.
On May 7, 2001, Pioneer USA received proposed solicitation materials
prepared by Sierra Fund 3 indicating that Sierra Fund planned to make a tender
offer for up to 4.9% of the limited partnership interests of Parker & Parsley
88-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. at a price equivalent to $200 and
$240 per $1,000 initial investment, respectively, in each of the partnerships.
Sierra Fund requested and received a list of limited partners of these
partnerships. On June 28, 2001, Pioneer USA learned that on or about June 14,
2001 Sierra Fund made a tender offer for up to 4.9% of the limited partnership
interests of Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd., Parker &
Parsley 84-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.,
and Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. at a price equivalent to $75, $85, $110, $80,
$110 and $110 per $1,000 investment, respectively, in each of the partnerships.
On July 11, 2001, as required by law, Pioneer USA filed with the SEC a response
to each of Sierra Fund's tender offers taking a neutral position with respect to
each tender offer.
Three other limited partners have expressed interest to Pioneer USA in
either making offers for the assets of particular partnerships or in purchasing
the limited partnership interests of other limited partners. In May 2001,
Salvage Investors, L.L.C. expressed interest in making an offer for the assets
of Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. but did not indicate a price at which it would be
willing to purchase those assets. Also in May 2001, Horace Potts IV expressed
interest in making an offer for the assets of unspecified partnerships or,
alternatively, in soliciting higher offers on the assets of those partnerships,
but did not indicate a price at which he would be willing to purchase those
assets. In June 2001, Nancy R. Schauer expressed interest in purchasing limited
partnership interests of Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd., Parker & Parsley
87-B Conv., Ltd. and Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. Pioneer USA
received a copy of correspondence from Ms. Schauer to the limited partners of
those partnerships in which Ms. Schauer asked the limited partners to vote
against the proposed mergers and to call her if they wanted to sell their
limited partnership interest.
Additionally, in May 2001 James A. Smith of Indigo Ventures requested, and
Pioneer later sent to him, a list of the limited partners of Parker & Parsley
Private Investment 89, L.P. and Parker and Parsley 90 Spraberry Private
32
Development, L.P. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA do not know if Mr. Smith
contacted any limited partners of those partnerships.
On June 12, 2001, the Pioneer USA board of directors voted to change the
method for allocating the expenses of the mergers such that (i) the limited
partners of the participating partnerships would bear their pro rata portion of
the merger expenses, and (ii) the limited partners of each nonparticipating
partnership would bear a portion of the merger expenses equal to the number of
limited partnership interests of such partnership voting in favor of the merger
divided by the total number of limited partnership interests of such partnership
voting on the merger.
On June 18, 2001, in follow-up discussions between Pioneer Parent, Pioneer
USA and Stanger, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA orally agreed, subject to the
approval of their respective boards, to revise the pricing terms of the merger
transaction as follows: (1) that the merger value for each partnership would
equal the sum of the partnership's reserve value and its working capital, in
each case as of March 31, 2001, less the cash distribution to be paid in July
2001 and less the partnership's pro rata share of expenses and fees to be
incurred in connection with the mergers of all of the partnerships, except that
Pioneer Parent would pay (A) any such expenses and fees in excess of $2,000,000
in the aggregate and (B) a portion of such expenses and fees otherwise allocable
to any nonparticipating partnership, (2) to reduce the discount rate that would
be used in calculating the present value of the estimated future net revenues
from 13.5% to 10%, (3) to change the composition of the payment of the merger
value for each partnership from 25% in cash and 75% in shares of Pioneer Parent
common stock to 100% in shares of Pioneer Parent common stock based on the
average closing price of the Pioneer Parent common stock, as reported by the New
York Stock Exchange, for the ten trading days ending three days business days
before the date of the special meeting of the partnership, and (4) to engage
Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. to review the estimate of each
partnership's reserves and the present value of the estimated future net
revenues from those estimated reserves as of March 31, 2001. The effect of the
revised pricing terms was to increase the merger consideration that would be
paid to each of the participating partnerships upon completion of the merger
transaction.
On June 21, 2001, Pioneer Parent's board met and approved the revised
pricing terms.
At a special meeting held on June 21, 2001, Pioneer USA's board continued
discussions with Sayles, Lidji & Werbner and Stanger regarding the merger
proposals for each partnership. Stanger also orally presented to Pioneer USA's
board the status of its findings and its preliminary evaluation of the proposed
transaction based on the new pricing terms for the merger transaction. Pioneer
USA's board decided that it would take the recommendation of the merger
transaction to the limited partners of each partnership under advisement, so
that the board members could review the written presentation materials provided
by Stanger and the revised written offer to be submitted by Pioneer Parent, and
agreed to convene a special meeting on June 25, 2001.
On June 22, 2001, Pioneer Parent submitted its written offer with the
revised pricing terms to Pioneer USA.
On June 25, 2001, Pioneer USA's board held a special meeting with Sayles,
Lidji & Werbner and Stanger to discuss the merger proposals for each partnership
and Stanger's fairness opinion. The board then unanimously approved proceeding
with the merger of each partnership, subject to (1) the execution of a
definitive merger agreement, (2) its receipt of Stanger's fairness opinion, and
(3) the Securities and Exchange Commission's declaration that the registration
statement that includes this document is effective under the Securities Act of
1933.
On July 3, 2001, Pioneer USA received a letter from a publicly-traded
independent oil and gas company indicating its interest in making an offer to
acquire the partnerships or the partnerships' assets. At the company's request,
Pioneer USA provided a draft confidentiality agreement and established a data
room as a predicate to the company's review of the partnerships and the
partnerships' assets. In August, the company informed Pioneer USA that it
decided not to pursue the acquisition of the partnerships or the partnerships'
assets.
On July 27, 2001, in order to make the transaction more favorable to the
limited partners, Pioneer Parent agreed to bear the merger expenses of the
nonparticipating partnerships, and therefore to eliminate the requirement that
the nonparticipating partnerships bear a portion of the merger expenses.
In a special meeting of the board of Pioneer USA held on August 20, 2001,
Stanger presented its analysis of the merger transaction and delivered its
fairness opinion dated August 20, 2001, that the merger value for each
partnership and the allocation of such merger value (1) to the limited partners
of each partnership as a group, (2) to the general partners of each partnership
as a group, (3) to Pioneer USA as the managing or sole general partner of each
partnership, (4) to the unaffiliated limited partners of each partnership as a
group and (5) to the unaffiliated limited partners of the nonmanaging general
partner, if any, of each partnership as a group, is fair to the unaffiliated
limited partners of each partnership and the unaffiliated limited partners of
the nonmanaging general partner, if any, of each partnership, from a
33
financial point of view. Although Stanger's fairness opinion found that
repurchase offers in six limited partnerships and one secondary market
transaction in three limited partnerships were at prices higher than the merger
value per $1,000 original investment in those partnerships, the board of Pioneer
USA accepted Stanger's conclusion as to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the merger value and the allocation of the merger value. In doing so,
the board of Pioneer USA took into consideration the change in prices of oil and
gas since the prices on which the repurchase offers and secondary market
transactions were based and also took into account that neither the repurchase
offers nor the secondary market afford all limited partners liquidity for all
their interests in the limited partnerships. The board of Pioneer USA then
unanimously determined that the merger proposals for each partnership are
advisable, fair to the unaffiliated limited partners of each partnership and in
the best interests of the unaffiliated limited partners of each partnership.
Accordingly, the board recommended that the unaffiliated limited partners of
each partnership vote for the merger proposals.
In a special meeting of the board of Pioneer USA held on September 19,
2001, the board of Pioneer USA unanimously reaffirmed its August 20, 2001,
determination that the merger proposals for each partnership are advisable, fair
to the unaffiliated limited partners of each partnership, and in the best
interests of the unaffiliated limited partners of each partnership. Accordingly,
the board recommended that the unaffiliated limited partners of each partnership
vote for the merger proposals and authorized the officers of Pioneer USA to
execute the merger agreement.
On September 20, 2001, Pioneer, Pioneer USA and the partnerships signed the
merger agreement.
REASONS FOR THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
General. For all of the reasons listed below, Pioneer Parent believes that
it is the party in the position to pay the highest price for the limited
partnership interests of each partnership. Pioneer USA also believes that
Pioneer Parent is the most likely buyer for each partnership's properties in
light of:
- Pioneer USA's operation of most of the properties;
- Pioneer USA's extensive property holdings in the same fields; and
- Pioneer Parent's ability to achieve efficiencies by consolidating
operations with its existing operations in the same areas.
Pioneer Parent's Reasons. Pioneer Parent believes that completion of the
merger of each partnership at this time is advantageous to it for the following
reasons:
- Consolidate Core Area of Operations. The Spraberry field of the Permian
Basin is one of Pioneer Parent's 25 fields of focus in its strategic
plan. Acquisition of each partnership's properties would help consolidate
Pioneer Parent's operations in the Spraberry field and achieve operating
efficiencies. Pioneer USA operates most of each partnership's wells, and
Pioneer Parent has extensive properties around each partnership's
properties, including interests in most of each partnership's wells.
- Achieve Operating Efficiencies. Pioneer Parent expects to improve
operating efficiencies with respect to the properties acquired in the
merger of each partnership because it will be able to com-mingle
production of oil from each participating partnership's properties with
production of oil from other Pioneer Parent properties for storage,
transportation and sale. Production of oil from each partnership's
properties is predominantly segregated from Pioneer Parent's production
of oil until sale. Gas production is currently, and will continue to be,
metered, which means that it is measured and allocated based on
ownership.
- Achieve Administrative Efficiencies. Pioneer Parent will eliminate the
time spent by Pioneer Parent employees related to preparing and filing
each partnership's separate tax returns, financial statements and, for
each reporting partnership, reports with the SEC, as well as dealing with
the concerns of approximately 29,000 limited partners of
34
record. Although Pioneer Parent will lose the benefit of each partnership's
reimbursement for general and administrative expenses, it will be able to use
the additional time of its personnel to help achieve its corporate strategic
goals.
Pioneer USA's Reasons. In considering the merger of each partnership, the
board of directors of Pioneer USA considered the benefits to the limited
partners of each partnership set forth beginning on page 7 as well as the
following factors:
- Maturity of Partnerships and Properties. Although each partnership's
properties were long-lived at the formation of the partnership, each
partnership's properties are now mature, ranging from approximately 10 to
approximately 20 years old. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA anticipated
that at some point each partnership would need to be liquidated. Pioneer
USA is recommending the merger transaction for each partnership at this
time because:
- Pioneer USA believes that Pioneer Parent is the most likely buyer and is
the only potential buyer with an offer outstanding. While third parties
have made inquiries, no one except Pioneer Parent has made an offer to
Pioneer USA to acquire any of the partnerships.
- Oil and gas prices have recovered from significant lows in 1998. As a
result, Pioneer USA believes that Pioneer Parent's pricing is higher
than it would have been otherwise.
- As our production continues to decline, administrative expenses for each
partnership are increasing on a per BOE produced basis. Moreover, the
administrative cost of continuing to produce each partnership to
depletion could be significant, especially if no buyer is available at
the time each partnership is shut down.
- As discussed below, the tax incentives for which each partnership (other
than Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley
Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. and Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P., which were formed to purchase producing
properties) was originally formed have been realized.
- Declining Cash Flows. As each partnership's properties have matured, the
net cash flows from operations for the partnership have generally
declined, except in periods of substantially increasing commodity prices.
See Table 7 of Appendix A for each partnership's historical cash
distributions. The marginal benefit of continuing the operations of each
partnership is offset by the related administrative costs. These
administrative costs consume an increasing amount, and ultimately will
consume the entire amount, of the cash flows of each partnership as
production declines.
- Tax Incentives Have Been Realized. Each partnership (other than Parker &
Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. and Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A,
L.P., which were formed to purchase producing properties) was intended to
provide to its partners federal income tax deductions for intangible
drilling and development costs incurred by the partnership during the
initial years of the partnership. Pioneer USA believes that the tax
incentives have been realized through the drilling activities that each
partnership has completed.
- Partnership Tax Burdens May Now Exceed Benefits. As net cash flow
available for distribution of each partnership has declined or, at times,
disappeared, some limited partners of the partnership may incur greater
costs to include their share of the tax information of the partnership in
their returns than they receive in cash distributions. In any event, all
limited partners of each partnership are expected to benefit by the
elimination of the obligation to include partnership information in their
tax returns for the years after the merger of each partnership in which
they own interests.
- Each Partnership is Unable to Access Additional Capital. Pioneer Parent,
through its subsidiary, Pioneer USA, has the ability, financial and
otherwise, to take advantage of corporate opportunities to expand its
reserve base through acquisitions. None of the partnerships has the
ability to raise capital for reserve acquisitions or development of any
undeveloped reserves. The partnership agreements of the partnerships do
not authorize the partnerships to raise additional capital, whether debt
or equity. Even if the partnership agreement of each partnership is
amended to authorize additional capital, Pioneer Parent does not believe
that the limited partners of the partnership would desire to contribute
additional capital or to apply all cash flow to debt service, while
remaining taxable on the related income.
35
- Fairness of Procedures. Pioneer USA considered the following factors in
making its recommendation that the unaffiliated limited partners vote for
the merger proposals for each partnership in which they own interests:
- None of the partnerships has any employees or directors, and all of
Pioneer USA's directors are officers of Pioneer USA and of Pioneer
Parent. As a result, there has been no approval by directors who are
not Pioneer Parent employees.
- Pioneer USA did not retain an unaffiliated representative to act solely
on behalf of the unaffiliated limited partners of each partnership for
purposes of negotiating the terms of the merger of the partnership or
preparing a report concerning the fairness of the merger of the
partnership.
- Since Pioneer USA is entitled to vote its limited partnership interests
other than as described below, the transaction is not structured so
that the approval of at least a majority of unaffiliated limited
partnership interests is required. Pioneer USA intends to vote in favor
of the transaction for the partnership interests it holds as a limited
partner of each partnership as permitted by the partnership agreement
of each partnership except in the following partnerships where the
partnership agreement does not allow Pioneer USA to vote on the
proposed transaction:
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.
Despite the foregoing factors, Pioneer USA believes each merger is
procedurally fair to the unaffiliated limited partners of each
partnership because:
- Pioneer USA has been willing to consider any offer from third parties
to purchase any partnership or the assets of any partnership since
September 8, 1999, and will continue to do so, although Pioneer USA has
not actively solicited any third party offers during this time; and
- Pioneer Parent does not directly own any partnership interests in the
partnerships. Pioneer Parent beneficially owns all of Pioneer USA's
partnership interests in the partnerships. Pioneer USA does not
beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding limited partnership
interests in any partnership, except Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.,
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. and Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. In those
partnerships, Pioneer USA repurchased and now owns partnership
interests representing the following beneficial ownership percentages:
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.............................5.84%
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd............................11.71%
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd...........................5.97%
Except as set forth above, none of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, or, to
the knowledge of Pioneer USA, any of their directors or executive
officers, or any associate or subsidiary of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA
beneficially owns any partnership interests of any partnership. As a
result, Pioneer USA believes that neither it nor its affiliates have a
meaningful voting percentage for any partnership, other than Parker &
Parsley 81-I, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. and Parker & Parsley
82-III, Ltd. See "Ownership of Partnership Interests" on page 71 of
this document and Table 6 of Appendix A to this document.
- Fairness of Transaction. Pioneer USA's board of directors determined
that the merger of each partnership is advisable, fair to the
unaffiliated limited partners of the partnership and in their best
interests. In reaching this determination for each partnership, Pioneer
USA's board of directors considered the following factors:
- The form and amount of consideration offered to the partners of the
partnership;
- The objectives of the merger of the partnership, including providing
liquidity to the partners;
- Pioneer USA's right to consider third party offers;
- The current market prices for oil and gas, including the increase in
market prices, and the subsequent increase in merger value for the
partnership, since the merger transaction was initially proposed in
1999;
36
- The historical market prices for oil and gas;
- The net book value, going concern value and liquidation value of the
partnership;
- The purchase prices paid in previous repurchases by Pioneer USA;
- The trading price of limited partnership interests in secondary market
transactions;
- The analysis of alternative transactions to the proposed merger of each
partnership; and
- The fairness opinion of Stanger, including the analyses conducted by
Stanger in rendering the fairness opinion.
RECOMMENDATION OF PIONEER USA
On September 19, 2001, Pioneer USA's board of directors unanimously
determined that the merger of each partnership is advisable, fair to the
unaffiliated limited partners of the partnership, and in their best interests.
PIONEER USA'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE UNAFFILIATED LIMITED
PARTNERS VOTE FOR THE MERGER PROPOSALS FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP IN WHICH THEY OWN
INTERESTS.
In making this recommendation, Pioneer USA's board of directors considered
a number of factors, including (1) the reasons for the merger of each
partnership set forth above in "Special Factors -- Reasons for the Merger of
Each Partnership," such as the fairness opinion and analyses conducted by
Stanger, and (2) the matters described under "Risk Factors" beginning on page 20
of this document, such as its conflicting interests. Pioneer USA's board of
directors also considered the likelihood, benefits and costs of other
transactions, including possible third party offers. Pioneer USA will consider
any offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its assets. See
"The Merger of Each Partnership -- Third Party Offers" on page 58 of this
document for a description of the procedures for these offers. In view of the
numerous factors taken into consideration, Pioneer USA's board of directors did
not consider it practical to, and did not attempt to, quantify or assign
relative weights to the factors considered by it in reaching its decision to
recommend the merger of each partnership. Rather, the board viewed its position
and recommendation as being based on the total information presented to and
considered by the board.
FAIRNESS OPINION
Pioneer USA, on behalf of each partnership, engaged Robert A. Stanger &
Co., Inc., an independent financial advisory firm, to conduct an independent
review and deliver a written opinion in connection with the merger of each
partnership that the merger value for each partnership and the allocation of the
merger value of the partnership (1) to the limited partners of the partnership
as a group, (2) to the general partners of the partnership as a group, (3) to
Pioneer USA as the managing or sole general partner of the partnership, (4) to
the unaffiliated limited partners of the partnership as a group and (5) to the
unaffiliated limited partners of the nonmanaging general partner, if any, of the
partnership as a group, is fair to the unaffiliated limited partners of the
partnership and the unaffiliated limited partners of the nonmanaging general
partner, if any, of the partnership, from a financial point of view. The full
text of Stanger's fairness opinion is attached as Appendix D to this document
and is incorporated into this document by reference. Limited partners of each
partnership are urged to read the opinion in its entirety. This summary of
Stanger's fairness opinion is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full
text of the opinion. Stanger has advised us that arriving at a fairness opinion
is a complex analytical process not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis
or amenable to summary description. For a description of all the material
assumptions and qualifications to the fairness opinion, see "Qualifications to
Fairness Opinion" on page 38 and "Assumptions" beginning on page 43.
Except for assumptions described in "Assumptions" beginning on page 43,
which Pioneer USA advised Stanger would be reasonable and appropriate in its
view, neither Pioneer USA nor any partnership imposed any conditions or
limitations on the scope of the investigation by Stanger or the methods and
procedures to be followed by Stanger in rendering the fairness opinion. In
addition, each partnership has agreed to indemnify Stanger against some
liabilities arising out of Stanger's engagement to prepare and deliver its
opinion. Upon consummation of the merger of the partnership, those
indemnification obligations will become obligations of Pioneer USA.
Experience of Stanger. Since its founding in 1978, Stanger has provided
information, research, investment banking and consulting services to clients
located throughout the United Sates, including major New York Stock Exchange
member firms and insurance companies and over 70 companies engaged in the
management and operation of partnerships. The investment banking activities of
Stanger include financial advisory and fairness opinion services, asset and
securities valuations, industry and company research and analysis, litigation
support and expert witness services, and due diligence investigations in
connection with both publicly registered and privately placed securities
transactions.
37
Stanger was selected because of its experience in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers, acquisitions,
reorganizations and for estate, tax, corporate and other purposes, including the
valuation of partnerships, partnership securities and the assets typically held
through partnerships including oil and gas assets. Pioneer USA has previously
engaged Stanger to provide financial advisory services in connection with
proposed transactions between one or more of the partnerships and Pioneer Parent
which were never consummated.
Qualifications to Fairness Opinion. In the fairness opinion, Stanger
specifically states that it was not requested to, and did not:
- make any recommendations to Pioneer USA, any partnership or the limited
partners of any partnership with respect to whether to approve or reject
the merger of any partnership;
- determine or negotiate the amount or form of the merger value for any
partnership to be paid for limited partners' interests in the merger of
the partnership;
- offer the assets of any partnership for sale to any third party;
- express any opinion as to:
- the impact on Pioneer USA or the limited partners of any partnership
that does not participate in the proposed merger transaction;
- the tax consequences of the merger of any partnership for Pioneer USA,
the nonmanaging general partner, if any, of the partnership or the
limited partners of the partnership;
- Pioneer USA's or Pioneer Parent's ability to finance their obligations
under the merger agreement or the impact of a failure to obtain
financing on the financial performance of Pioneer USA, Pioneer Parent
or any partnership;
- Pioneer USA's decision to estimate the reserve value of the oil and gas
reserves of each partnership based upon the continued operation of the
properties by Pioneer USA and the payment of overhead charges in
accordance with existing operating agreements or the impact, if any, on
the estimated value of each partnership's oil and gas reserves if
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA determined to offer or operate the
assets subject to revised operating agreements;
- whether or not alternative methods of determining the merger value for
each partnership would have also provided fair results or results
substantially similar to the methodology used;
- alternatives to the merger of each partnership, including the offering
of such assets for sale to third party buyers;
- the trading price of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock immediately
following the closing of the merger of each partnership and the
distribution of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock in connection
with the merger of each partnership;
- the fairness of the termination of the repurchase obligations of
Pioneer USA with respect to some partnerships, which repurchase
obligations require Pioneer USA to offer to repurchase limited
partnership interests annually based upon a formula which in some
circumstances, including the repurchase offers based upon December 31,
2000 oil and gas prices, result in repurchase offer prices above the
market value for the reserves of any such partnership; or
- any other terms of the merger of any partnership.
Summary of Material Considered and Investigation Undertaken. Stanger's
analysis of the merger of each partnership involved a review of the following
information:
- a draft of this preliminary document;
- a draft of the merger agreement which Pioneer USA has indicated is
substantially the form which will be executed in connection with the
merger of each partnership;
- financial statements of each partnership, including, if applicable, the
partnership's Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, for the six months ended June 30,
2001 and for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998;
- the reserve reports prepared by Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA and the
review by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., as of March 31, 2001,
relating to the reserves of each partnership;
38
- the reserve reports prepared by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.,
as of December 31, 2000, relating to the reserves of each partnership;
- calculations prepared by Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA of the merger
value per $1,000 of limited partner investment in each partnership;
- Pioneer USA's analysis of other alternatives to the merger of each
partnership, including going concern value, liquidation value, royalty
trust and production payment;
- estimates prepared by Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA of the going concern
value and liquidation value per $1,000 of limited partner investment in
each partnership;
- the financial statements of Pioneer Parent included in its Form 10-Q for
the six months ended June 30, 2001 and its Form 10-K for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998;
- pro forma financial data for Pioneer Parent assuming the completion of
the proposed merger transaction; and
- recent trading activity in shares of Pioneer Parent common stock.
In the course of its analysis, Stanger conducted interviews of senior
management personnel of Pioneer USA. During such interviews, Stanger and the
senior management personnel reviewed the status of the merger of each
partnership, the reserve pricing and related value estimates, the estimated
timing of the merger of each partnership and other matters.
Stanger reviewed estimates of the merger value, going-concern value, and
liquidation value prepared by Pioneer USA with respect to each partnership. In
addition, Stanger reviewed secondary market prices, as tracked by Stanger, for
limited partnership interests in each partnership along with tender offers
received by limited partners as derived from data provided by Pioneer USA.
Stanger's analysis is summarized below.
Review of Merger Value for Each Partnership. Stanger reviewed the
calculation of the merger value for each partnership prepared by Pioneer USA.
Stanger observed that such calculation includes the reserve value, as described
below, and other current assets as of March 31, 2001, as reduced by other
current liabilities as of March 31, 2001, less the partnership's pro rata share,
based on its reserve value, of the estimated expenses and fees of the mergers of
all of the partnerships and less the cash distribution mailed on July 13, 2001,
by the partnership to its partners. Stanger reviewed the balance sheet of each
partnership as of March 31, 2001 as prepared by Pioneer USA, and reconciled the
current assets and current liabilities on such financial statements to the
balances included in the merger value calculation for each partnership.
Stanger reviewed the summary reserve reports for each partnership prepared
by Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA as reviewed by Williamson Petroleum
Consultants, Inc. as of March 31, 2001. Stanger noted that the summary reserve
report was prepared based upon the following pricing case: (1) a five-year NYMEX
futures price for oil and gas as of March 30, 2001, with prices held constant
after year five at the year five price and (2) historical operating costs
adjusted only for those items affected by commodity prices, such as production
taxes and ad valorem taxes. For 2001, the oil and gas prices were based on the
average NYMEX futures price for the nine-month period beginning on April 1, 2001
and ending December 31, 2001. The standard industry adjustments reflect oil
quality, BTU content, oil and gas gathering and transportation costs, and gas
processing costs and shrinkage.
Stanger further observed that the summary reserve report utilized a
discount rate of 10.0% and resulted in a per barrel of oil equivalent, or BOE,
value of the reserves for each of the partnerships ranging from $3.52 to $4.60.
However, Stanger observed that such properties are long-lived, generally
low-volume properties, not operated by any of the partnerships, and are subject
to overhead charges by the operator, Pioneer USA. In the course of its
engagement, Stanger reviewed selected comparable transactions in the BOE value
range described above for long-lived, generally low-volume properties. Such
transactions, including some transactions involving other Pioneer USA
affiliates, provided a range of value per BOE of $2.97 to 5.08 and an average of
$4.00.
Stanger, in connection with its engagement, interviewed acquisitions
personnel at seven oil and gas companies regarding targeted pricing case ranges
and discount rate ranges in order to assess the reasonableness of the pricing
case and discount rates utilized to establish the reserve value for the
partnerships. With respect to the pricing case ranges, Stanger observed a low
pricing case range pursuant to the survey of $22 per barrel of oil and $3.50 per
Mcf of gas, held flat for the life of the reserves to a high pricing case range
of NYMEX strip pricing (plus $2 per barrel of oil) and NYMEX strip pricing for
gas, held flat after five years for the life of the reserves. With respect to
discount rates, Stanger observed a range of discount rates from a low of 9% to
13% applied generally to a low range pricing case to a high range
39
of 15% to 20%, applied generally to a high range pricing case. Stanger concluded
that the pricing case and discount rates utilized to establish the merger value
for each partnership fall within the ranges established in interviews with
acquisition professionals.
Going Concern Value. Stanger reviewed the going concern value calculation
prepared for each partnership by Pioneer USA. The going concern value was based
upon:
- The sum of (1) the estimated net cash flow from sale of the reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (2) the estimated residual value
from the sale of the remaining reserves at the end of the operating
period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as in the
merger value calculation; less
- The cash distributions on July 13, 2001 by the partnership to its
partners; and
- Partnership level general and administrative expenses, calculated as
follows and, consistent with the calculation of 2000 and 1999 expenses,
generally representing the maximum expense percentages permitted under
the partnership agreements:
- The partnership agreement for each of Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.,
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd., Parker &
Parsley 82-II, Ltd. and Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. permits Pioneer
USA to allocate to the partnership (1) general and administrative
expenses and (2) all expenses directly attributable to the partnership
as a result of fees or charges by parties other than Pioneer USA or its
affiliates, including legal, auditing and engineering fees. However,
for purposes of clause (1) and for administrative ease and to the
benefit of each of those partnerships, Pioneer USA allocates to each of
those partnerships general and administrative expenses based on 3% of
the revenues of the partnership.
- The partnership agreement for each of Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. and
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. permits Pioneer USA to allocate to the
partnership (1) general and administrative expenses in an annual amount
not to exceed the sum of 2% of the initial partner capital for the
partnership and 2.25% of the drilling and completion expenses, of which
there are none, and (2) all expenses directly attributable to the
partnership as a result of fees or charges by parties other than
Pioneer USA or its affiliates, including legal, auditing and
engineering fees. However, for purposes of clause (1) and for
administrative ease and to the benefit of each of those partnerships,
Pioneer USA allocates to each of those partnerships general and
administrative expenses based on 3% of the revenues of the partnership.
- The partnership agreement for Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. permits
Pioneer USA to allocate to the partnership (1) general and
administrative expenses in an annual amount not to exceed the sum of
3.25% of the revenues of the partnership and 2.25% of the drilling and
completion expenses, of which there are none, and (2) all expenses
directly attributable to the partnership as a result of fees or charges
by parties other than Pioneer USA or its affiliates, including legal,
auditing and engineering fees. However, for purposes of clause (1) and
for administrative ease and to the benefit of the partnership, Pioneer
USA allocates to the partnership general and administrative expenses
based on 3% of the revenues of the partnership.
- The partnership agreement for each of the following partnerships
permits Pioneer USA to allocate to the partnership general and
administrative expenses, including all expenses directly attributable
to the partnership as a result of fees or charges by parties other than
Pioneer USA or its affiliates, such as legal, auditing and engineering
fees, in an annual amount not to exceed 2% of the revenues of the
partnership.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.
- The partnership agreement for each of the following partnerships
permits Pioneer USA to allocate to the partnership general and
administrative expenses, including all expenses directly attributable
to the partnership as a result of fees or charges by parties other than
Pioneer USA or its affiliates, such as legal, auditing and engineering
fees, in an annual amount not to exceed 3% of the revenues of the
partnership.
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd.
40
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P.
- The partnership agreement for each of the following partnerships permits
Pioneer USA to allocate to the partnership (1) general and
administrative expenses in an annual amount not to exceed 3% of the
revenues of the partnership, and (2) all expenses directly attributable
to the partnership as a result of fees or charges by parties other than
Pioneer USA or its affiliates, including legal, auditing and engineering
fees.
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.
- The partnership agreement for each of the following partnerships permits
Pioneer USA to allocate to the partnership (1) general and
administrative expenses in an annual amount not to exceed 5% of the
revenues of the partnership, and (2) all expenses directly attributable
to the partnership as a result of fees or charges by parties other than
Pioneer USA or its affiliates, including legal, auditing and engineering
fees. However, for purposes of clause (1) and for administrative ease
and to the benefit of each of the partnerships, Pioneer USA allocates to
the partnership general and administrative expenses based on 3% of the
revenues of the partnership.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P.
Stanger observed that the going concern value of each partnership was
adjusted for the March 31, 2001 working capital balance less the distribution
mailed on July 13, 2001 and that such going concern value ranged from 4.7% to
9.8% less than the merger value for each partnership. See the supplemental
information table on the second page of the supplement for each partnership for
its merger value and its going concern value, in each case per $1,000 limited
partner investment.
Liquidation Value. Stanger reviewed the liquidation value calculation
prepared for each partnership by Pioneer USA. Such liquidation value was based
upon the sale of the reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation
expenses which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata
share of the estimated expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the
partnerships and (B) 3% of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash
distributions on July 13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The
liquidation expenses represent the estimated costs to retain an investment
banker or broker to sell the assets of each partnership and the legal and other
closing costs associated with such transaction. Stanger observed that such
merger expenses are intended to reflect Pioneer USA's estimate of the cost
associated with brokers' commissions on asset sales and the additional wind-down
costs of the partnership. Stanger observed that the liquidation value for each
partnership ranged from 2.7% to 3.0% less than the merger value for each
41
partnership. See the supplemental information table on the second page of the
supplement for each partnership for its merger value and its liquidation value,
in each case per $1,000 limited partner investment.
Secondary Market Prices. To determine the most up-to-date secondary market
prices, Stanger reviewed the secondary market prices for units of limited
partnership interests in each of the partnerships during the 12 months ended
June 30, 2001, collected from data maintained on partnerships by Stanger.
Stanger observed that secondary market transactions were reported for 24 of the
partnerships during such period. Stanger observed that for all partnerships
except Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd., the weighted average
secondary market price on a per $1,000 original investment basis was less than
the merger value per $1,000 original investment. For such other partnerships,
the range of discount to the merger value per $1,000 investment was 7.7% to
55.5%, averaging 28.6%. For Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.,
Stanger observed that only one transaction involving $10,000 of original
investment (20 units) was at a price in excess of the merger value per $1,000 of
original investment. All other secondary market transactions for Parker &
Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. were reported at prices below the merger
value. Stanger also observed secondary market transactions at prices in excess
of the merger value for two additional partnerships. Secondary market firms
reported a single transaction during the twelve months ended June 30, 2001 for
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. and Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. at a price in
excess of merger value. All other transactions reported for such partnerships
were at amounts less than the merger value during the twelve months ended June
30, 2001.
Stanger also reviewed secondary market data obtained by Pioneer USA from
Partnership Spectrum. Stanger observed that such data included partnerships
which reported a secondary market transaction price in excess of the high-end
transaction price Stanger observed in its data. In all cases, except Parker &
Parsley 82-II, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. and Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd., such high-end range was lower than the merger value.
Prices in the secondary market are based on market prices at the time of
the secondary market transaction, which prices may be lower than prices
prevailing at June 30, 2001, or as of the date of mailing this document.
Selected Tender Offers. Stanger observed that Pioneer USA reported
unsolicited tender offers from unaffiliated third parties for less than 5% of
the interests in the following partnerships during the period June 1998 through
July 2001. Stanger observed that the tender offers and related merger value per
limited partnership interest for each of those partnerships were as follows:
MERGER VALUE TENDER OFFER DISCOUNT TO MERGER
PARTNERSHIP (PER $1,000 INVESTMENT) (PER $1,000 INVESTMENT) VALUE
----------- ----------------------- ----------------------- ------------------
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd................... $103.27 $13.75 (86.7%)
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd.................. 121.71 26.25 (78.4%)
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.(a)................ 142.17 40.00 to 75.00 (47.2%) to (71.9%)
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.(a)................ 159.87 50.00 to 85.00 (46.8%) to (68.7%)
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.(a)................ 199.06 60.00 to 110.00 (44.7%) to (69.9%)
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.................... 137.90 80.00 (42.0%)
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.................... 170.04 40.00 (76.5%)
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.(a)................ 230.38 110.00 to 115.00 (50.1%) to (52.3%)
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.(a)................ 165.38 65.00 to 67.50 (59.2%) to (60.7%)
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd.(a)................ 199.53 90.00 to 105.00 (47.4%) to (54.9%)
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.(a)................ 207.86 60.00 to 110.00 (47.1%) to (71.1%)
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.................... 247.13 80.00 (67.6%)
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.................... 341.24 50.00 (85.3%)
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89,
L.P......................................... 284.67 162.50 (42.9%)
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.(a)................ 273.11 102.50 to 160.00 (41.4%) to (62.5%)
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.(a)................ 247.05 30.00 to 40.00 (83.8%) to (87.9%)
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev.,
L.P......................................... 310.90 162.50 (47.7%)
---------------
(a) More than one tender offer for partnership interests was made. Amounts
shown represent the range of tender offer prices.
Stanger observed that the above tender offers represent a discount to the
merger value for each of those partnerships of 41.4% to 87.9%. Stanger also
observed that tender offers for limited partnership securities are generally at
prices which represent a substantial discount to the underlying value of the
assets held by such partnerships. Furthermore, the tender
42
offer prices are based on oil prices prevailing at the time of the tender offer,
which prices may have been lower than oil prices prevailing at March 30, 2001 or
as of the date of mailing this document.
Repurchase Offers. Stanger observed that for each of the six partnerships
listed below, which Stanger calls the repurchase partnerships, Pioneer USA is
required under the partnership agreement for the partnership to offer to
repurchase units of limited partnership interests in the partnership annually at
a formula price based upon the December 31 year end reserve report. Stanger
observed that the repurchase offer pricing at December 31, 2000 tends to
overstate the value of units of the repurchase partnerships due primarily to the
oil and gas prices in effect on such date and the effect of such pricing on the
cash flows and recoverable reserves. Stanger observed that the repurchase offers
for 2000 for the repurchase partnerships are at premiums to the merger value
ranging from 24.6% to 65.6% as follows:
PER $1,000 ORIGINAL INVESTMENT
-----------------------------------------
MERGER VALUE REPURCHASE OFFER PREMIUM
------------ ---------------- -------
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.................................. $ 83.32 $137.97 65.6%
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd................................. 103.27 133.72 29.5%
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd................................ 121.71 151.60 24.6%
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.................................. 142.17 196.67 38.3%
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.................................. 159.87 210.15 31.5%
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.................................. 199.06 267.03 34.1%
Stanger observed that the repurchase rights may be exercised only once a
year and that a limited partner may exercise its repurchase right by delivering
a written request to Pioneer USA no later than March 31 of each year. Pioneer
USA advised Stanger that on or before May 31 of each year, Pioneer USA must
notify each limited partner who has exercised its repurchase right of the amount
of limited partnership interests to be repurchased and the method of calculating
the repurchase price. Pioneer USA advised Stanger that the aggregate amount of
limited partnership interests required to be repurchased in any one year is
limited to $100,000 per partnership. A repurchase price is calculated by
multiplying:
- the present value of the estimated future net revenues, calculated using
a discount rate equal to prime plus 1% as of December 31 of each year,
from a partnership's estimated reserves, as determined by independent
petroleum consultants; by
- 66 2/3%.
Stanger advised that each limited partner who has exercised its repurchase
right has 60 days to accept Pioneer USA's repurchase offer and that Pioneer USA
must pay the repurchase price to each limited partner who accepts the repurchase
offer within 30 days after acceptance.
Stanger further advised Pioneer USA and each repurchase partnership that no
adjustment was made to the merger value offered to the repurchase partnership to
reflect the repurchase offer obligation and Stanger's opinion does not include
an opinion as to the fairness of the termination of Pioneer USA's repurchase
obligation.
Assumptions. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA advised Stanger that the oil
and gas properties owned by each partnership are subject to operating agreements
with Pioneer USA and that:
- such operating agreements provide for the payment of overhead charges and
that such charges are reasonable compared with amounts charged for
similar services by third party operators;
- except for cause, such operating agreements do not provide for the
termination of Pioneer USA as operator; and
- such operating agreements do not provide for the revision of the overhead
charges, except as escalated under the terms of such operating
agreements.
Furthermore, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA advised Stanger that if each
partnership's reserves were offered for sale to a third party, a condition of
such sale would be that the oil and gas reserves would continue to be subject to
the operating agreements with Pioneer USA which provide for the payment of
overhead charges, and that it would be appropriate to assume, when estimating
the value of such reserves, that such charges would continue.
In addition, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA advised Stanger that the
reserve value and working capital balance of each partnership has been properly
allocated between the general partners and the limited partners of each
partnership in accordance with the partnership agreement with respect to a
liquidation.
43
Stanger did not conduct any engineering studies and has relied on estimates
of Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA with respect to oil and gas reserve volumes,
prices, operating costs and overhead charges with respect to the reserve value
estimates. Furthermore, Stanger has relied upon the review by Williamson of the
summary reserve reports as of March 31, 2001.
Stanger also relied on the assurance of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and
each partnership that:
- the summary reserve report reviewed by Williamson Petroleum Consultants,
Inc. as of March 31, 2001, and provided to Stanger was in the judgment of
Pioneer USA and each partnership reasonably prepared on bases consistent
with actual historical experience and reflect their best currently
available estimates and good faith judgments;
- there are no estimates of costs to remediate environmental conditions
included in the reserve analysis;
- any historical financial data, balance sheet data, merger value analyses,
going concern value analyses and liquidation value analyses are accurate
and complete in all material respects;
- all allocations included in the calculations of merger values, going
concern values and liquidation values have been made in accordance with
the partnership agreement of each partnership;
- no material changes have occurred in the information reviewed or in the
value of the oil and gas reserves or working capital balances as of March
31, 2001, of each partnership between the date the information was
provided to Stanger and the date of Stanger's opinion;
- the relative ownership interests of (1) the limited partners of each
partnership, (2) the unaffiliated limited partners of each partnership,
(3) the general partners of each partnership, (4) the unaffiliated
limited partners of the nonmanaging general partner, if any, of each
partnership and (5) Pioneer USA, as the managing or sole general partner
of each partnership, is accurately included in accordance with the
partnership agreement for each partnership in the analyses provided to
Stanger by Pioneer USA;
- neither Pioneer Parent or any of its affiliates has during the 30 days
prior to the date hereof commenced or continued a share repurchase
program or similar transaction which could affect the price of shares of
Pioneer Parent common stock to be used in the proposed merger
transaction; and
- Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and each partnership are not aware of any
information or facts regarding the partnership, the oil and gas
properties, the reserve analysis or the working capital balances of the
partnership that would cause the information supplied to Stanger to be
incomplete or misleading in any material respect.
Stanger's opinion is based upon business, economic, oil and gas market and
other conditions as of the date of its analysis and addresses the merger value
for each partnership in the context of information available as of the date of
Stanger's analysis. Events occurring after the date of Stanger's analysis could
affect the value of the assets of each partnership or the assumptions used in
the preparation of Stanger's fairness opinion.
Conclusions. Stanger concluded that, based upon and subject to its
analysis, assumptions, limitations and qualifications cited in its opinion, and
as of the date of the fairness opinion, the merger value for each partnership
and the allocation of the merger value of the partnership (1) to the limited
partners of the partnership as a group, (2) to the general partners of the
partnership as a group, (3) to Pioneer USA as the managing or sole general
partner of the partnership, (4) to the unaffiliated limited partners of the
partnership as a group and (5) to the unaffiliated limited partners of the
nonmanaging general partner, if any, of the partnership as a group, is fair to
the unaffiliated limited partners of the partnership and the unaffiliated
limited partners of the nonmanaging general partner, if any, of the partnership,
from a financial point of view. Stanger's fairness opinion is dated August 20,
2001.
Compensation and Material Relationships. Stanger has been paid a total fee
of $350,000 in connection with the rendering of the fairness opinion. Such fee
was not conditioned on Stanger's findings and is payable whether or not the
merger of each partnership is consummated. In addition, Stanger will be
reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, including legal fees, and
will be indemnified against some liabilities, including some liabilities under
the securities laws. To the extent that such indemnification includes
liabilities arising under the federal securities laws, it may not be enforceable
as it may be determined to be against public policy.
During the past two years, Pioneer USA engaged Stanger to render financial
advisory services in connection with proposed transactions which were withdrawn
and never consummated. In connection with such assignments Stanger was paid fees
aggregating $175,000.
44
SUMMARY RESERVE REPORT
Pioneer USA engaged Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., which we call
Williamson, an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm based in
Midland, Texas, to review a summary reserve report of the property interests of
each of the partnerships as of March 31, 2001. THE FULL TEXT OF THE REVIEW OF
THE SUMMARY RESERVE REPORT BY WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC. EFFECTIVE
AS OF MARCH 31, 2001, IS ATTACHED AS APPENDIX B. WE URGE YOU TO READ IT
CAREFULLY IN ITS ENTIRETY.
Qualifications and Method of Selection. Williamson is engaged solely in
the business of petroleum evaluation and engineering studies for public and
private oil and gas companies. Williamson is widely recognized in its field.
Williamson is an independent consulting firm as provided in the Standards
Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information
promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Pioneer USA engaged Williamson based upon Pioneer USA's assessment of their
professional reputations and qualifications, capabilities, experience and
responsiveness. In addition, Williamson is the independent petroleum engineering
firm most familiar with the properties in which each partnership has interests
and has prepared the annual independent reserve report for each partnership's
reserves since the inception of each partnership.
Summary of Procedures, Scope and Findings. Williamson reviewed the
calculations of the estimated total net estimated reserves for each partnership
and the present value of the estimated future net revenues from the estimated
reserves for each partnership as of March 31, 2001, based on the following
parameters provided by Pioneer USA: (1) a five-year NYMEX futures price for oil
and gas as of March 30, 2001 with prices held constant after year five at the
year five price, less standard industry adjustments, (2) historical operating
costs adjusted only for those items affected by commodity prices, such as
production taxes and ad valorem taxes, and (3) a 10.0% discount rate. For 2001,
the oil and gas prices were based on the average NYMEX futures price for the
nine-month period beginning on April 1, 2001 and ending December 31, 2001.
Williamson's estimated total net estimated reserves and the present value of the
estimated future net revenues from the estimated reserves for each partnership
are set forth in the exhibits to the summary reserve report attached as Appendix
B to this document.
Pioneer Parent determined the amount of Pioneer Parent common stock to be
offered. Williamson did not opine on the fairness of the transaction.
In preparing its summary reserve report, Williamson assumed the accuracy
and completeness of all information provided by Pioneer USA or information which
was publicly available and did not attempt to independently verify such
information. Williamson did not make field inspections or judgments relative to
environmental or other legal liabilities. Except as described in this document,
Pioneer USA did not instruct Williamson as to the pricing, cost or other
economic parameters or methods or the assessment of reserves characteristics,
nor did it limit the scope of Williamson's investigation for purposes of
preparing its summary reserve report.
Pioneer USA provided Williamson with all evaluation data with respect to
interests, reversionary status, oil and gas prices, gas categories, gas contract
terms, operating expenses, investments, salvage values, abandonment costs, net
profit interests, well information and current operating conditions for
Williamson's use in determining each partnership's reserves. Williamson used
production data provided by Pioneer USA, and where information was not provided
by Pioneer USA, Williamson used production data from public records. Williamson
prepared its own reserve estimates of the property interests.
Williamson's review included testing and evaluating the reserve information
for all of the properties of each partnership. The review is more comprehensive
than an audit, which involves testing and evaluating the reserve information of
a representative subgroup of properties of each partnership.
Prior Material Relationships. Williamson has estimated total proved
reserves and the present value of estimated future revenues from those reserves
for each of the partnerships since their respective inceptions. In addition,
Pioneer USA engaged Williamson to prepare a summary reserve report in connection
with a proposed transaction in 1999, similar to the one described in this
document, which was withdrawn and never consummated. Pioneer USA and its
affiliates have paid $112,700 over the past two years to Williamson. Neither
Williamson nor any of its personnel has any direct or indirect interest in
Pioneer USA or any of the partnerships, and Williamson's compensation is not
contingent upon the results of its summary reserve report.
45
ALTERNATIVE TRANSACTIONS TO THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
We considered the following alternative types of transactions before
selecting the merger transaction described in this document. As discussed below,
we believe that the merger of each partnership is the best available alternative
for each partnership to maximize the consideration to the limited partners.
Comparison of the Merger of Each Partnership to Continuing
Operations. Because each partnership's properties are mature, producing
properties, we believe that production from those properties will continue to
decline at the rate predicted in the partnership's oil and gas engineering
reserve reports. Accordingly, cash distributions from each partnership will also
decline, subject to variation for changes in oil and gas prices. The marginal
benefit of continuing operations of each partnership is offset by the general
and administrative costs related to continuing operations. See "Special
Factors -- Reasons for the Merger of Each Partnership" beginning on page 34 of
this document.
We also believe there is a substantial advantage in receiving the
liquidating distribution at present in the form of Pioneer Parent common stock,
rather than continuing to receive decreasing levels of cash distributions over a
long period of time. We believe that the merger value for each partnership is
higher than the net present value of estimated future cash distributions to the
limited partners from continued operations because the merger value has not been
reduced for the reimbursement of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses allocable to the partnership. In addition, although future oil and gas
prices could be higher than the prices on March 30, 2001 which were used in
calculating the merger value for each partnership, continued operations over a
long period of time subject the limited partners of each partnership to the risk
of receiving lower levels of cash distributions if oil and gas prices over this
period are lower on average than those used in preparing the estimates of cash
distributions from continued operations. Continued operations also subject the
limited partners of each partnership to possible changes in costs or need for
workover or similar significant remedial work on each partnership's properties.
In contrast, the Pioneer Parent common stock is a liquid tradeable security
which can be sold and redeployed in other investments. The Pioneer Parent common
stock provides the limited partners of each partnership the opportunity to
participate in a larger entity having more diversified producing reserves and
other oil and gas properties, with the resulting spreading of risks.
We expect that any nonparticipating partnership will continue operations
and will produce its reserves until depletion with steadily decreasing rates of
cash flow and, as a result, decreasing cash distributions.
Comparison of the Merger of Each Partnership to Master Limited
Partnership. We considered accomplishing the consolidation of each partnership
through a master limited partnership, pursuant to which the partnership
interests of the limited partners of the partnership would be exchanged for
interests in the master limited partnership. However, we believe each
partnership's oil and gas properties are not of sufficient size, individually or
in the aggregate with the other partnerships, to attract new capital through a
master limited partnership. In addition, the partnership interests in a master
limited partnership might not be traded on a national stock exchange or in any
other significant market. Some master limited partnership interests might be
sold from time to time in private or over-the-counter transactions, but the
prices would likely reflect a discount for illiquidity. As a result, we believe
a master limited partnership would not provide the limited partners with
immediate and complete liquidity for their investment in each partnership.
Finally, a master limited partnership would still be burdened with general and
administrative expenses, which would reduce any cash distributions paid to the
partners of the master limited partnership. The merger value for each
partnership reflects a liquidation value and has not been reduced for any
reimbursement of Pioneer USA's general and administrative expenses allocable to
the partnership.
Comparison of the Merger of Each Partnership to Royalty Trust. We also
considered a royalty trust, pursuant to which the partnership interests of each
partnership would be exchanged for beneficial ownership interests in the trust.
Like the master limited partnership alternative discussed above, we believe each
partnership's oil and gas properties are not of sufficient size, individually or
in the aggregate with the other partnerships, to attract new capital through a
royalty trust. In addition, the beneficial ownership interests in a royalty
trust might not be publicly traded in a significant market. As a result, this
alternative was not selected because we believe it would not result in immediate
and complete liquidity for the limited partners' investments in any partnership.
Finally, a royalty trust would still be burdened with general and administrative
expenses, which would reduce any cash distributions paid to the beneficiaries of
the royalty trust. The merger value for each partnership reflects a liquidation
value and has not been reduced for any reimbursement of Pioneer USA's general
and administrative expenses allocable to the partnership.
Comparison of the Merger of Each Partnership to Production Payment. We
also considered whether each partnership would benefit from attempting to sell a
production payment against its future oil and gas production in exchange for
cash. Like the master limited partnership and royalty trust alternatives
discussed above, we believe each partnership's oil and gas properties are not of
a sufficient size, individually or in the aggregate with the other partnerships,
46
to attract new capital from lenders or investors. In addition, lenders or
investors that provide production payment alternatives will not advance funds
against 100% of future oil and gas production, and typically limit any
production payment transaction to less than 70% of estimated future oil and gas
production. As a result, this alternative was not selected because we believe it
would not provide the limited partners with immediate and complete liquidity for
their investment in each partnership. Even with a production payment
transaction, each partnership would continue to be burdened with general and
administrative expenses which would reduce any cash distributions paid to the
limited partners. The merger value for each partnership reflects a liquidation
value and has not been reduced for any reimbursement of Pioneer USA's general
and administrative expenses allocable to the partnership.
Comparison of the Merger of Each Partnership to Negotiated Sale. We also
considered whether each partnership would benefit from attempting to sell its
property interests in negotiated transactions. Buyers would be purchasing the
partnership's property interests which they would neither control nor operate. A
portion of the properties in which each partnership owns interests would
continue to be operated by Pioneer USA because Pioneer USA controls other
interests in fields in which the partnership's properties are located. Because
of Pioneer USA's control of such properties, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA
believe Pioneer Parent is the party in the position to pay the highest price for
such interests and the one most likely to do so. In contrast, Pioneer USA's
control of such properties could negatively affect the amount a third party is
willing to pay and the overall interest of third parties in buying such
properties.
In addition, sale of each partnership's properties on a direct basis often
involves substantial periods of time for due diligence, negotiation and
execution of agreements and closings, often with different purchasers for
different properties. Satisfying due diligence requests requires large amounts
of time to create and supervise data rooms or disseminate data to possible
purchasers, plus the time needed to deal directly with multiple prospective
purchasers. Furthermore, some issues, such as environmental and title matters,
may come to light in the late stages of a negotiated sale, which may delay or
preclude the consummation of the sale.
The transaction costs for offering properties in a negotiated sale could be
substantial, and often are higher than other means of sale. Those costs include:
- preparing and disseminating information on properties to be offered;
- soliciting attendance by prospective purchasers; and
- screening and qualifying purchasers.
In a third party sale, we expect that each partnership would have to pay
its own expenses or that the price would be reduced to take the expenses into
account.
Based on the factors described above, we decided to issue an invitation for
third party bids rather than conduct a full auction. That is, in September 1999
we established a price and publicly announced that we will consider third party
offers to purchase any partnership or its assets at prices that are higher than
the 1999 merger value for such partnership. We have repeated our willingness to
consider third party offers in connection with the merger of each partnership we
now propose, so long as the prices offered exceed those we are offering. We
believe this process would result in a better price to the limited partners than
if we merely offered the partnership or its assets for sale at any price.
Pioneer Parent has the right to match or top any third party offer. In addition,
any such offer would be subject to our right to continue operation of the
properties. See "The Merger of Each Partnership -- Third Party Offers" on page
58. Although we received some preliminary indications of interest from third
parties during the last quarter of 1999 and from a third party in July 2001,
none of those third parties has ever made a formal bid for any partnership or
its assets. In May and June of 2001, we were contacted by several parties
interested in purchasing partnership interests from the limited partners of
certain partnerships. See "Special Factors -- Background of the Merger of Each
Partnership" beginning on page 27. Other than announcing that we will consider
third party offers for any partnership or its assets, we have not actively
solicited bids from third parties.
47
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document includes "forward-looking statements" as defined by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. These statements concern Pioneer Parent's,
Pioneer USA's and each partnership's plans, expectations and objectives for
future operations. All statements, other than statements of historical facts,
included in this document that address activities, events or developments that
Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and each partnership expect, believe or anticipate
will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements and include the
following:
- completion of the proposed merger of each partnership;
- reserve estimates;
- future production of oil and gas; and
- future financial performance.
These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions, which Pioneer
Parent, Pioneer USA and each partnership believe are reasonable, but which are
open to a wide range of uncertainties and business risks. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated are discussed
in (1) "Risk Factors" beginning on page 20 of this document, (2) periodic
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Annual Reports on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, for Pioneer Parent and each
reporting partnership, and (3) "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for the year ended December 31,
2000 included in the supplement to this document for each nonreporting
partnership.
"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995: Statements in this document regarding each company's business which
are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" that involve risks and
uncertainties. For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties, which could
cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward looking
statements, see "Risk Factors" beginning on page 20 of this document.
48
METHOD OF DETERMINING MERGER VALUE FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP
AND AMOUNT OF PIONEER PARENT COMMON STOCK OFFERED
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA have agreed to a merger value for each
partnership for purposes of the merger of the partnership. The method of
determining the merger value for each partnership was not determined by
arm's-length negotiations. See "Risk Factors -- You Were Not Independently
Represented in Establishing the Terms of the Merger of Each Partnership" on page
21 and "Interests of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and Their Directors and
Officers" beginning on page 70. The calculations made by Pioneer Parent and
Pioneer USA in determining the merger values were based primarily on data
maintained by Pioneer USA in conjunction with its responsibilities as operator
of the properties and keeper of the books and records of the partnerships.
In March 2001, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA agreed to use March 31, 2001
to determine the merger value for each partnership and to base the number of
shares of Pioneer Parent common stock to be offered on the average closing price
of the Pioneer Parent common stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange,
for the ten trading days ending three business days before the initial date of
the special meeting for each partnership. On July 27, 2001, it was agreed that
each participating partnership would bear its pro rata portion of the merger
expenses and that Pioneer Parent would bear the merger expenses of the
nonparticipating partnerships and the merger expenses in excess of $2,000,000.
The method of determining the merger value was finalized on August 17, 2001,
when Pioneer USA received the summary letter of Williamson Petroleum
Consultants, Inc. reviewing estimates of each partnership's reserves. For
purposes of illustration in this document, we have calculated the number of
shares to be issued based on an assumed average closing price of $18.00 per
share of Pioneer Parent common stock. Prior to the date of the special meeting
for each partnership, we will update the number of shares to be issued using the
actual average closing price of Pioneer Parent common stock for the ten trading
days ending three business days before the initial date scheduled for the
special meeting. Neither Pioneer Parent nor Pioneer USA will adjust any of the
other components of the merger value for any partnership.
COMPONENTS OF MERGER VALUE FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA calculated the merger value assigned to each
partnership as follows:
- Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA agreed to use the volumes of the
partnership's estimated reserves as of March 31, 2001, as taken from the
summary reserve report reviewed by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.
as of March 31, 2001.
- Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA agreed to use the present value of
estimated future net revenues for each partnership from the estimated
reserves for each partnership at March 31, 2001, as reviewed by
Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. in its summary reserve report
dated August 17, 2001. In its review, Williamson Petroleum Consultants,
Inc. evaluated the methods and procedures used by Pioneer USA in the
preparation of Pioneer USA's estimates of reserves and associated future
net revenue and rendered its opinion that the estimates are reasonable in
the aggregate and prepared in accordance with generally accepted
petroleum engineering and evaluation principles. See Appendix B to this
document. The reserve value component of the merger value for each
partnership is also set forth in Table 16 of Appendix A to this document.
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA instructed Williamson to use the following
parameters in calculating the present value of estimated future net
revenues: (1) a five-year NYMEX futures price for oil and gas as of March
30, 2001, with prices held constant after year five at the year five
price, less standard industry adjustments, (2) historical operating costs
adjusted only for those items affected by commodity prices, such as
production taxes and ad valorem taxes, and (3) a discount rate of 10.0%.
For 2001, the oil and gas prices were based on the average NYMEX futures
price for the nine-month period beginning on April 1, 2001 and ending
December 31, 2001. See the table on page 6 for the NYMEX futures prices.
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA believe that the five-year NYMEX futures
prices provide a reasonable benchmark on the outlook for energy prices
and are regularly used by financial markets, industry participants, and
lenders in evaluating transactions.
- The standard industry price adjustments include:
(1) the effects of oil quality;
(2) British thermal unit, or BTU, content for gas;
(3) any bonus paid;
(4) oil and gas gathering and transportation costs; and
(5) gas processing costs and shrinkage.
49
Those adjustments reflect assumptions about the costs to extract,
transport and process, if necessary, crude oil, natural gas liquids and
natural gas to their point of sale.
- Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA agreed to use a 10.0% discount rate
because Pioneer Parent believes that a 10.0% discount rate is necessary
based upon the risks involved in the oil and gas industry and Pioneer
Parent's requirement to achieve a minimum rate of return on its
investment.
- Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA added the present value of the
partnership's estimated future net revenues as of March 31, 2001 to the
partnership's net working capital as of March 31, 2001 and then reduced
that sum by (i) the partnership's pro rata share, based on its reserve
value, of the estimated expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the
partnerships and (2) the cash distribution mailed on July 13, 2001, by
the partnership to its partners. Since the merger value for each
partnership includes net working capital, the merger value assigned to
the partnership includes the partnership's assets and liabilities other
than its oil and gas reserves. Each partnership's other assets and
liabilities consist mainly of cash, accounts receivable from the sale of
oil and gas production and accounts payable.
- The number of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock to be issued to the
limited partners of each partnership upon the merger of the partnership
will be determined by dividing the merger value assigned to the
partnership by the value of one share of Pioneer Parent common stock
determined as described below. For purposes of example in this document,
a share of Pioneer Parent common stock has been valued at an assumed
average closing price of $18.00. However, on the closing date of the
merger of each partnership, the value of a share of Pioneer Parent common
stock will be recalculated by computing the average closing price of the
Pioneer Parent common stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange,
for the ten trading days ending December 17, 2001, three business days
before December 20, 2001, the initial date of the special meeting for
each partnership. This recalculated value, and not the assumed average
closing price of $18.00 per share of Pioneer Parent common stock, used
for illustration purposes in this document and on each limited partner's
proxy card, will be used to determine the actual number of shares of
Pioneer Parent common stock to be issued in the merger of each
partnership. The recalculated value may be more or less than the assumed
average closing price of $18.00 per share of Pioneer Parent common stock.
Pioneer Parent may abandon the proposed merger of any or all of the
partnerships at any time prior to the special meeting for any such
partnership for any reason including changes in, among other things, the
price of Pioneer Parent common stock, the market prices for oil and gas
generally or the oil and gas industry generally.
Distributions. No cash distributions will be made by any partnership to
its partners after the distribution made on July 13, 2001, through the closing
date or termination date of the merger of the partnership. The Pioneer Parent
common stock to be distributed as payment of the merger value of each
participating partnership already reflects the expected amount of those
distributions. However, any cash distributions by a nonparticipating partnership
which would have been paid during that time period in the ordinary course of
that partnership's business will be distributed to its partners at about the
same time that the certificates representing Pioneer Parent common stock are
mailed to the partners of each participating partnership.
Liabilities. Pioneer USA will assume all of the liabilities, including
contingent liabilities and obligations, of each participating partnership as of
the closing date of the merger of the partnership. As of the date of this
document, Pioneer USA is not aware of any material contingent liabilities to
which any partnership is subject.
Expenses. The expenses and fees to be incurred in connection with the
merger of each partnership are expected to be approximately $2.0 million in
total. Each participating partnership will pay its pro rata share, based on its
reserve value, of those estimated expenses and fees. Pioneer Parent will pay the
pro rata share of each nonparticipating partnership's estimated expenses and
fees. Pioneer Parent has also agreed to pay any expenses and fees actually
incurred in excess of $2.0 million and, if Pioneer Parent terminates or abandons
the merger as to any partnership, any expenses or fees allocated to that
partnership. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA have reduced each partnership's
merger value by that partnership's pro rata share of the estimated expenses and
fees.
ALLOCATION OF MERGER VALUE FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP AMONG PARTNERS OF THE
PARTNERSHIP
In determining the portion of the merger value attributable to each $1,000
of initial limited partner investment in a partnership, Pioneer Parent
determined the amount payable per $1,000 investment as if the assets of the
partnership had been sold on March 31, 2001 for cash equal to the merger value
of the partnership and the proceeds distributed in accordance with the
liquidation provisions of the partnership's partnership agreement. The limited
partners of each participating partnership would receive the same amounts if the
merger value of the partnership was allocated among the
50
partners based on the revenue-sharing provisions of the partnership agreement
except for each of the following partnerships which will receive more proceeds
under the liquidation provisions of its respective partnership agreement than
under its revenue-sharing provisions due to certain prospect-by-prospect payout
provisions not being met:
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd.
OTHER METHODS OF DETERMINING MERGER VALUES
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA believe that the method used to determine
the merger value for each partnership is a fair and reasonable method of valuing
the partnership's properties. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA considered a number
of alternative methods of determining the merger value for each partnership
before selecting a method. However, the selected method might not accurately
reflect the value of each partnership's assets. See "Risk Factors -- Risk
Factors Relating to the Merger of Each Partnership -- The Merger Value for a
Partnership Will Not be Adjusted For Changes in Oil and Gas Prices Before the
Completion of Its Merger" on page 20. The following alternative methods for
determining the merger value for each partnership should be taken into account
in assessing the adequacy of the selected method.
Book Value of Assets. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA did not base the
calculation of merger value for each partnership on the net book value of the
partnership's assets. The net book value of each partnership's assets is based
upon the financial statements reported in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The net book value is not adjusted for estimates in
changes in the fair market value of the assets. For this reason, Pioneer Parent
and Pioneer USA believe that the merger value for each partnership is more
indicative of the fair market value of the assets of each partnership than the
net book value of the partnership's assets. See the supplemental information
table on the second page of the supplement for each partnership for the
partnership's merger value and its book value, in each case per $1,000 limited
partner investment. In all cases except Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd., the merger
value is higher than the book value. For Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd., the
merger value is lower than book value because of the long-lived nature of the
oil and gas properties owned by Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. The merger value of
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. takes into account the discounting effect of owning
long-lived oil and gas reserves that is not reflected in a book value
computation for the partnership. Nonetheless, Pioneer USA has determined that
the merger transaction is fair to the limited partners of Parker & Parsley
81-II, Ltd. (1) for the reasons noted above and (2) because Pioneer Parent and
Pioneer USA believe that the five-year NYMEX futures prices used in the
calculation of the merger value for the partnership (A) provide a reasonable
benchmark on the outlook for energy prices, (B) are regularly used by financial
markets, industry participants, and lenders in evaluating transactions, and (C)
are higher than historic prices.
Trading Price of Units. None of the partnership interests are traded on a
national stock exchange or in any other significant market. Although some
partnership interests are occasionally sold in private or an informal secondary
market for limited partner securities, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA believe
any market for the partnership interests is not reliable as an indicator of
value because any such market is highly illiquid and generally reflects an
illiquidity discount. As a result, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA did not base
the calculation of the merger value for any partnership on recent trading prices
of partnership interests in the partnership. See Table 15 of Appendix A for
historical information about recent trades of partnership interests in each
partnership.
Repurchase Offers. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA did not base the
calculation of the merger value for any partnership on the price of recent
repurchase offers in the partnership. Most partnerships do not have a repurchase
offer obligation, so no repurchase price information was available for those
partnerships. Of the partnerships with a repurchase offer obligation, the most
recent repurchase offers were based on December 31, 2000 oil and gas prices. The
merger value for each partnership with repurchase offer obligations is lower
than the 2001 repurchase offer price for the partnership because the repurchase
price was based on NYMEX oil and gas prices as of December 31, 2000, which were
$26.69 per Bbl of oil and $9.95 per Mcf of gas. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA
believe that the repurchase obligation is not an indicator of fair value because
it is calculated annually on December 31 using oil and gas prices for that
specific day. The value determined under the repurchase obligation does not
adequately reflect future demand and supply fundamentals which have historically
resulted in significant volatility to oil and gas prices. See "Risk
Factors -- Risk Factors Relating to the Merger of Each Partnership -- Repurchase
Offers in 2001 By Each of the Six Partnerships with a Repurchase Obligation were
Higher than the Merger Value for the Partnership" on page 22 of this document
and Table 8 of Appendix A to this document for information on each partnership
with repurchase offer obligations.
51
Timing of Pricing. Oil and gas prices have recovered from NYMEX oil and
gas prices of $12.00 per Bbl of oil and $2.00 per Mcf of gas as of December 31,
1998, to the five-year NYMEX futures prices for oil and gas as of March 30,
2001, set forth in the table on page 6 of this document. Pioneer Parent and
Pioneer USA used those recovered oil and gas prices to calculate the merger
value for each partnership. Future oil and gas prices could be higher or lower
than the prices on March 30, 2001 which were used in calculating the merger
value for each partnership. Significant increases in future prices would
increase cash available for distribution from each partnership and could, in
retrospect, suggest that the merger value for such partnership was low by
comparison. If those prices were to continue to prevail in the future, the
merger value for each partnership would appear low by comparison. In contrast,
however, if those prices decline in the future, the merger value for each
partnership would appear high by comparison.
52
THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
GENERAL
Immediately before the effective time of the merger of each participating
partnership, the partnership agreement for the partnership will be amended by
the merger amendment to permit the merger of the partnership with and into us.
At the effective time of the merger of each participating partnership, the
partnership will be merged with and into us. We will be the surviving entity. In
addition, at the effective time of the merger of each participating partnership,
each of your partnership interests in the partnership will be converted into the
right to receive Pioneer Parent common stock.
LEGAL OPINION FOR LIMITED PARTNERS
Each of the partnership agreements, except the partnership agreement for
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P., requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners of each partnership
to Pioneer USA that neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve
the merger of the partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the
federal income tax classification of the partnership or any of its limited
partners. In addition, the partnership agreement for each of the following
partnerships requires an opinion that neither the grant nor exercise of such
right will result in the loss of any limited partner's limited liability:
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd.
For each of the partnerships, other than those listed below, the counsel
designated to render the opinion described above must be counsel other than
counsel to Pioneer USA or any partnership:
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.
In all cases, the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners of each partnership.
Neither Pioneer Parent nor Pioneer USA believe that approval of the legal
opinions of the special legal counsel to the limited partners will have any
effect on any rights the limited partners may have to bring suit against Pioneer
Parent or Pioneer USA (other than any claim of breach of these provisions of the
partnership agreements), nor do Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA expect that
approval of the legal opinions would alter any right the limited partners may
have to bring suit against the special legal counsel to the limited partners.
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA believe that these provisions of the partnership
agreement were written at a time when the effect of limited partner votes were
not well established under tax and limited partnership laws. More recent
partnership agreements generally do not have these kinds of requirements because
revised uniform limited partnership laws and amendments to tax laws and
regulations have eliminated these issues for most typical partnership voting
situations.
53
In all cases, Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP,
of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as to matters
of Texas law) for the limited purpose of rendering the legal opinions described
above on behalf of the limited partners of each partnership to Pioneer USA.
Neither Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP nor Arter & Hadden LLP is affiliated
with Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA or any of the partnerships. The merger
proposals for each partnership include an approval of those counsel and their
opinions. See "The Special Meetings -- Time and Place; Purpose" on page 65 of
this document. A copy of the opinions is attached as an exhibit to the merger
proposals for each partnership.
DISTRIBUTION OF PIONEER PARENT COMMON STOCK
Upon completion of the merger of each participating partnership, the
partners of the partnership will have no continuing interest in, or rights as
partners of, the partnership. The transfer books of each participating
partnership will be closed on the closing date of the merger of the partnership.
All partnership interests in each participating partnership will cease to be
outstanding, will automatically be cancelled and retired, and will cease to
exist. The certificates previously representing partnership interests in each
participating partnership held by record partners will represent only the right
to receive Pioneer Parent common stock.
We intend to mail certificates representing Pioneer Parent common stock to
the partners of record of each participating partnership promptly following the
effectiveness of the merger of the partnership in payment of the merger value
for the partnership. Partners of each participating partnership will not be
required to surrender partnership interest certificates to receive the Pioneer
Parent common stock.
FRACTIONAL SHARES
Pioneer Parent will not issue fractional shares to any limited partner upon
completion of the merger of any partnership. For each fractional share that
would otherwise be issued, Pioneer Parent will round any fractional shares of
Pioneer Parent common stock up to the nearest whole share.
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The legal conclusions contained in the following discussion of the material
federal income tax consequences of the conversion of partnership interests into
Pioneer Parent common stock pursuant to the merger of each participating
partnership constitute the opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., counsel for
Pioneer Parent, based upon the facts and assumptions set forth in the
registration statement on Form S-4 of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a
part and upon current law. Future legislative, judicial or administrative
changes or interpretations could alter or modify the following statements and
conclusions, and any of these changes or interpretations could be retroactive
and could affect the tax consequences to the limited partners of each
partnership. Further, any inaccuracy in any of the facts or assumptions set
forth in the registration statement could adversely affect or render obsolete
the opinion.
The opinion does not contain an exhaustive discussion of all possible tax
consequences. It does not address any state, local or foreign tax consequences,
nor does it discuss all of the aspects of federal income taxation that may be
relevant to specific partners in light of their particular circumstances. The
opinion describes the material federal income tax consequences applicable to
individuals who are citizens or residents of the United States, and therefore
has limited application to domestic corporations and persons subject to
specialized federal income tax treatment, such as foreign persons, tax-exempt
entities, regulated investment companies and insurance companies. The federal
tax consequences of each merger will vary for each limited partner because of
the different circumstances of each participating partnership and the individual
federal income tax position of each limited partner.
THE STATEMENTS AND CONCLUSIONS BELOW DO NOT ADDRESS THE PARTICULAR FACTS
AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF ANY PARTICULAR LIMITED PARTNER. YOU ARE ADVISED TO CONSULT
YOUR OWN TAX ADVISOR TO DETERMINE ALL OF THE RELEVANT FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL
TAX CONSEQUENCES OF EACH MERGER PARTICULAR TO YOU.
Tax Consequences of a Conversion of Partnership Interests.
- Generally. As more fully described below, if you own partnership
interests in a participating partnership, you will generally recognize an
aggregate amount of net gain or loss equal to the difference between (1)
the fair market value of Pioneer Parent common stock you receive in the
merger of that partnership and (2) your adjusted tax basis in your
partnership interests exclusive of any basis attributable to liabilities
of the partnership immediately prior to the merger. A component of that
net gain or loss may be ordinary income or ordinary loss depending upon
the extent of any recapture of depletion or intangible drilling and
development costs and any appreciation or
54
depreciation in the ordinary assets of the partnership. The recognition
of ordinary income will decrease the capital gain component or increase
the capital loss component of the net gain or loss otherwise recognizable
as a consequence of the merger.
- Characterization of the Merger of Each Partnership. The merger of a
participating partnership into Pioneer USA should be treated for federal
income tax purposes as a sale by such partnership of its assets for
Pioneer Parent common stock followed by a distribution of the Pioneer
Parent common stock received in liquidation of the limited partnership
interests. Under Section 613A of the Internal Revenue Code, each of the
partners of such partnership must:
- maintain the partner's share of the basis in the partnership's oil and
gas properties at the partner level;
- adjust such basis for depletion deductions; and
- use such basis to calculate gain or loss at the partner level on any
sale by the partnership of its oil and gas properties.
Accordingly, each of the mergers should be generally treated for tax
computation purposes as:
- a taxable sale by you of your interest in a participating partnership's
oil and gas properties for Pioneer Parent common stock and the
assumption of liabilities; and
- a taxable sale of any remaining partnership assets by the participating
partnership for Pioneer Parent common stock followed by a liquidation
of the participating partnership.
- Gain or Loss on Sale of Partnership Oil and Gas Properties. Upon the
deemed sale of a partnership's oil and gas properties in the merger of
the partnership, you will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference
between:
- the portion of the partnership's "amount realized" on the sale of its
oil and gas properties allocated to you; and
- your adjusted tax basis in the partnership oil and gas properties sold,
which must be reduced to reflect depletion claimed during the current
year in respect of production prior to the date of the merger.
The amount realized will include the fair market value of Pioneer Parent
common stock received and the amount of any liability assumed by Pioneer USA in
connection with the merger of the partnership which is attributable to the
partnership's oil and gas properties. If gain is recognized on such sale, the
portion of the gain that is treated as recapture of intangible drilling and
development costs or depletion will be treated as ordinary income. See
"Recapture of Intangible Drilling and Development Costs" and "Recapture of
Depletion" below. The remainder of such gain generally will constitute "Section
1231 gain." If loss is recognized on such sale, such loss generally will
constitute "Section 1231 loss." See "Section 1231 Gains and Losses" below. You
must take into account your share of the portion of the gain that constitutes
recapture income, if any, as ordinary income and must aggregate your share of
the Section 1231 gains and losses described above with any Section 1231 gains
and losses you realize from other sources.
- Other Gain or Loss. You will also recognize your allocable share of the
partnership's gain or loss, if any, on the deemed sale of its assets
other than oil and gas properties. Such gain or loss will be equal to the
difference between the amount realized by the partnership on the sale of
such assets and the partnership's adjusted tax basis in such assets. Such
gain or loss will be capital or ordinary depending on the nature of the
assets sold.
Finally, in the event that the fair market value of Pioneer Parent common
stock you receive in the merger of the partnership is more or less than the
adjusted tax basis in your partnership interests, as adjusted to reflect gains
and losses described in the two preceding paragraphs as well as the effects of
the partnership's current year activities, then upon the deemed liquidation of a
partnership, you will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference
between such amounts. See "Tax Consequences of Partnership Operations" below.
Pioneer USA will provide you with information necessary to make the
calculations under Section 613A of the Internal Revenue Code described above for
purposes of filing your own federal income tax return. In order to simplify your
federal income tax reporting, this information will include a calculation of the
amount and character of your gain on the deemed sale of the partnership's oil
and gas properties based upon our estimates. You should verify the accuracy of
these calculations based upon your own records.
- Section 1231 Gains and Losses. Generally, if the total amount of the
Section 1231 gains exceeds the total amount of Section 1231 losses, all
such gains and losses will be treated as capital gains and losses, and if
the total amount of the Section 1231 losses exceeds the total amount of
the gains, all such gains and losses will be treated as ordinary income
and losses. However, your net Section 1231 gains will be treated as
ordinary income to the extent
55
of your net Section 1231 losses during the immediately preceding five
years, reduced by any amount of net Section 1231 losses that have been
previously "recaptured" by you pursuant to this rule.
- Recapture of Intangible Drilling and Development Costs. Generally, all
or a portion of the amounts previously deducted for intangible drilling
and development costs for a property must be recaptured upon the
disposition of such property by treating the gain, if any, realized on
such disposition as ordinary income to the extent of such amounts. For a
property placed in service prior to 1987, the potential recapture amount
is equal to the excess of the aggregate amounts previously deducted for
intangible drilling and development costs for such property over the
amount by which the deduction for depletion for such property would have
been increased had the intangible drilling and development costs been
capitalized and recovered through depletion rather than deducted in the
year incurred. It should be noted that, if percentage depletion, rather
than cost depletion, has been claimed for such property, the hypothetical
capitalization of intangible drilling and development costs may result in
little or no increase in depletion deductions and, as a consequence, most
or all of the intangible drilling and development costs for such property
may be subject to recapture. For property placed in service during 1987
or thereafter, the full amount of intangible drilling and development
costs previously deducted, unreduced by depletion, is subject to
recapture to the extent of any gain.
- Recapture of Depletion. Upon the disposition of a property that was
placed in service during 1987 or thereafter, all amounts previously
deducted for depletion, whether cost depletion or percentage depletion,
to the extent such amounts reduced the basis in the property, must be
recaptured by treating the gain, if any, recognized on such disposition
as ordinary income to the extent of such amounts. No such recapture rule
is applicable to a property placed in service before 1987.
- Tax Rates. The capital gains rate for individuals and other
non-corporate taxpayers is 20% if the capital asset has been held for
more than one year at the time of consummation of the merger of each
partnership. Corporate taxpayers are taxed at a maximum marginal rate of
35% for both capital gains and ordinary income. The maximum marginal
federal income tax rate for ordinary income of individuals and other
non-corporate taxpayers is 39.1% for the 2001 calendar year under recent
legislation. Capital losses are deductible only to the extent of capital
gains, except that, subject to the passive activity loss limitation
discussed below, non-corporate taxpayers may deduct up to $3,000 of
capital losses in excess of the amount of their capital gains against
ordinary income. Excess capital losses generally can be carried forward
to succeeding years. A corporation is permitted to carry back excess
capital losses to the three preceding years, provided the carryback does
not increase or produce a net operating loss for any of those years. A
corporation's carryforward period is five years and a non-corporate
taxpayer can carry such losses forward indefinitely.
- Passive Activity Loss Limitation. Under Section 469 of the Internal
Revenue Code, any losses from any participating partnership that have
been suspended under the passive loss rules will become fully deductible
as a result of the merger of any such partnership.
FIRPTA Withholding. Gain recognized by a foreign limited partner on the
sale by a participating partnership of its assets pursuant to the merger of the
partnership will be subject to federal income tax if such gain is effectively
connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business by the partnership or the
foreign limited partner. Gain recognized on the sale of U.S. real property,
including a participating partnership's oil and gas properties, is treated as
effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business for this
purpose. Under Internal Revenue Code Section 1446, a participating partnership
in which an interest is held by a foreign person generally is required to deduct
and withhold a tax equal to the highest marginal federal income tax rate
applicable to the partner multiplied by such partner's allocable share of
effectively connected income. In order to comply with this requirement, each
participating partnership will withhold the prescribed percentage of the
effectively connected income allocated to you unless you properly complete and
sign a certification of non-foreign status certifying your taxpayer
identification number and address, and that you are not a foreign person.
Amounts withheld will be creditable against a limited partner's federal income
tax liability and, if in excess thereof, a refund may be obtained from the
Internal Revenue Service by filing a U.S. income tax return.
Tax Consequences of Partnership Operations. The federal income tax
consequences of the merger of each partnership, described above, are in addition
to the tax consequences of a participating partnership for the taxable year
ending on the closing date of the merger of the partnership. You must include
your allocable share of a participating partnership's items of income, gain,
loss, deduction and credit for that taxable year, including your allocable share
through the closing date of the merger of the partnership, on your federal
income tax return for that taxable year. That information will be provided to
you by or on behalf of the partnership on a Schedule K-1 as required by tax law.
The
56
results of partnership operations for such period will impact your tax basis in
your interest in a participating partnership, and your computation of gain or
loss resulting from the merger of the partnership.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
The merger of each participating partnership will be accounted for as a
purchase under generally accepted accounting principles. Under those rules,
Pioneer USA will record the assets and liabilities of each participating
partnership on its books at its estimated fair market value.
EFFECT OF DEBT OWED BY A LIMITED PARTNER TO PIONEER USA ON AMOUNT OF PIONEER
PARENT COMMON STOCK TO BE RECEIVED BY THE LIMITED PARTNER
If a limited partner is indebted to Pioneer USA for any portion of the
limited partner's original investment in the partnership, Pioneer USA plans to
apply the Pioneer Parent common stock that would otherwise be distributed to the
limited partner upon completion of the merger of the partnership against that
limited partner's indebtedness. If a limited partner's indebtedness to Pioneer
USA is less than the merger value allocated to limited partnership interests
held by the limited partner, the limited partner will receive Pioneer Parent
common stock equal to the amount by which such merger value exceeds such
indebtedness. If a limited partner's indebtedness to Pioneer USA is greater than
the merger value allocated to the limited partnership interests held by the
limited partner, Pioneer USA may collect the deficiency from the limited
partner.
EFFECT OF MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP ON LIMITED PARTNERS WHO DO NOT VOTE IN
FAVOR OF THE MERGER; NO APPRAISAL OR DISSENTERS' RIGHTS
You will be bound by the merger of each partnership in which you own an
interest if the limited partners in the partnership vote a majority, or 66 2/3%
for Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P., of their
partnership interests in favor of the merger, even if you vote against the
merger or do not vote. If the merger of the partnership occurs, you will be
entitled to receive only Pioneer Parent common stock based on the merger value
of your partnership interests in the partnership. Under the laws of the State of
Delaware and the State of Texas, which are the states of formation of the
partnerships, you are not entitled to appraisal or dissenters' rights with
respect to the merger of any partnership.
FUTURE OF NONPARTICIPATING PARTNERSHIPS
If the limited partners of a partnership do not approve the merger of that
partnership, the partnership will remain in existence. Each nonparticipating
partnership will continue to operate as a separate legal entity with its own
assets and liabilities. There will be no immediate change in its business
objectives, and Pioneer USA plans to continue to manage and operate each
nonparticipating partnership in accordance with the terms of its current
partnership agreement. A limited partner in a nonparticipating partnership will
retain the rights, privileges and obligations that the limited partner currently
has pursuant to the partnership agreement of the nonparticipating partnership.
At about the same time that Pioneer USA mails certificates for Pioneer Parent
common stock to the partners of each participating partnership in payment of the
merger value for the partnership, Pioneer USA will mail any cash distributions
that were delayed for administrative purposes prior to the completion of the
merger of each participating partnership to the partners of each
nonparticipating partnership.
Pioneer USA's board of directors will determine each nonparticipating
partnership's business plan. In addition, the board of directors of each of
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA will decide what, if any, actions they will take
with respect to each nonparticipating partnership. Potential activities may
include a tender offer for partnership interests of limited partners or a
proposal to acquire the assets of, or merge with, one or more of the
nonparticipating partnerships. Such proposals may be on terms similar to or
different from those of the merger of each partnership described in this
document.
Pioneer USA plans to continue to manage each nonparticipating partnership
until such partnership is dissolved or Pioneer USA is replaced as the general
partner of such partnership. The replacement of Pioneer USA as general partner
would require compliance with the partnership agreement of such nonparticipating
partnership, including the requisite vote of the limited partners thereof. A
nonparticipating partnership may be dissolved in the future in accordance with
its partnership agreement if Pioneer USA or any substituted general partner
withdraws from the nonparticipating partnership, or in some cases, otherwise
elects to dissolve that partnership. Pioneer USA might withdraw from, or
otherwise elect to dissolve, a nonparticipating partnership if Pioneer USA
determines that the nonparticipating partnership's continued
57
operation is uneconomical or its dissolution and liquidation are in the best
interests of the partners of that partnership. Upon dissolution, the
nonparticipating partnership's assets may be sold for cash or securities, which
may be more or less than the merger value assigned to that partnership, or
distributed in kind to the partners of the nonparticipating partnership. Any
such sale may be to Pioneer Parent or an affiliate of Pioneer Parent and may
involve cash or securities of Pioneer Parent.
NONMANAGING GENERAL PARTNERS OF SOME PARTNERSHIPS
Eight of the partnerships described in this document have two general
partners. In those eight partnerships, Pioneer USA is the managing general
partner. The second general partner in those partnerships is a partnership whose
limited partners are former affiliates of Pioneer Parent's predecessors. The
names of the eight partnerships and the names of the nonmanaging general partner
in each of those partnerships are:
PARTNERSHIP NONMANAGING GENERAL PARTNER
----------- ---------------------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.................................. P&P Employees 81-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd................................. P&P Employees 81-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.................................. P&P Employees 82-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd................................. P&P Employees 82-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd................................ P&P Employees 82-III, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.................................. P&P Employees 83-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.................................. P&P Employees 83-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.................................. P&P Employees 84-A, Ltd.
Pioneer USA is the sole general partner of each of the nonmanaging general
partners. In that capacity, Pioneer USA has authority:
- to cause the nonmanaging general partner to perform its obligations
relating to the partnership described above; and
- to exercise on behalf of the nonmanaging general partner all of the
rights and elections granted to the nonmanaging general partner by the
partnership described above.
None of the nonmanaging general partners has the right to vote on the
merger of any partnership. However, Pioneer USA, as the general partner of each
nonmanaging general partner, has approved the merger of each partnership and the
distribution of this document to the limited partners of each partnership and to
the unaffiliated limited partners of each nonmanaging general partner, if any,
of each partnership. The merger value attributable to the unaffiliated limited
partners of the nonmanaging general partners is $203,347, consisting of
approximately 11,298 shares of Pioneer Parent common stock in the aggregate
assuming an average closing price of $18.00 per share of Pioneer Parent common
stock. Pioneer USA will not receive any Pioneer Parent common stock in any
merger for its partnership interests in any nonmanaging general partner.
THIRD PARTY OFFERS
Pioneer USA will consider offers from third parties to purchase any
partnership or its assets. Those who wish to make an offer for any partnership
or its assets must demonstrate to Pioneer USA's reasonable satisfaction their
financial ability and willingness to complete such a transaction. Before
reviewing non-public information about a partnership, a third party will need to
enter into a customary confidentiality agreement. Offers should be at prices and
on terms that are fair to the partners of the partnership for which the offer is
being made and more favorable to the unaffiliated limited partners than the
prices and terms proposed for the merger of that partnership in this document.
Pioneer Parent reserves the right to match or top any such offer. In addition,
any such offer would be subject to Pioneer USA's right to continue operation of
the properties. Since first announcing our willingness to consider third party
offers in September 1999, Pioneer USA has not received any third party offer for
any partnership or its assets. Other than announcing that we will consider third
party offers for any partnership or its assets we have not actively solicited
bids from third parties. Persons desiring to make an offer for any partnership
should contact Timothy L. Dove or Mark L. Withrow, Board of Directors, Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc., 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039.
58
MERGER AMENDMENT
In order to complete the merger of each partnership, the partnership
agreement for the partnership requires an amendment to add a provision
permitting the merger of the partnership with and into Pioneer USA. See the
merger proposals, which include the merger amendment, set forth in Appendix E to
this document. At the special meeting for each partnership, the limited partners
of the partnership will vote upon the merger amendment, which, if approved, will
be effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of the merger of the
partnership.
TERMINATION OF REGISTRATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
As a result of the merger of each participating partnership, the
partnership interests in the partnership, as well as the partnership itself,
will cease to exist. Twenty-five of the partnerships described in this document
have registered their partnership interests under, or are otherwise subject to
the informational requirements of, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. See
"Where You Can Find More Information" for a list of those partnerships. Upon the
completion of the merger of each reporting partnership, Pioneer USA intends to
terminate:
- registration of the partnership interests of the partnership under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the partnership's obligations to file reports and other information under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Pioneer USA plans to cause each nonparticipating partnership that is also a
reporting partnership to continue to file reports and other information under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. However, Pioneer USA's board of directors
could determine in the future to cause each such partnership to terminate its
reporting obligations as permitted by federal securities laws.
The advantages of remaining registered, or remaining obligated to file
reports, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 include the informational and
reporting requirements under that act, including requirements related to tender
offers, proxy solicitation and consents and insiders' transactions in
partnership interests. Those reporting requirements may provide limited partners
with more detailed information on a more frequent basis than might otherwise be
required under the partnership agreement for the partnership. In addition, a
partnership's filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available to
the public over the Internet at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov and are also
available at the SEC's public reference room in Washington, D.C.
The disadvantages of remaining registered, or remaining obligated to file
reports, include the partnership's cost to prepare and distribute the various
reports and other information required under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Deregistering the partnership interests of a nonparticipating partnership
or otherwise terminating its filing and reporting obligations could reduce that
partnership's general and administrative expenses because the reporting
obligations of the partnership under its partnership agreement require annual
and semi-annual reports, but not quarterly reports.
ELIMINATION OF A FAIRNESS OPINION REQUIREMENT THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BENEFIT
PIONEER USA
Pioneer USA, as the sole general partner of each of Parker & Parsley 91-A,
L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P., is entitled to receive an opinion as to
the fairness of the proposed merger transaction to Pioneer USA in its capacity
as sole general partner of each of those partnerships. However, since Pioneer
Parent and Pioneer USA are the parties making the offer for the proposed merger
transaction, Pioneer USA will not seek such a fairness opinion. In addition,
Pioneer USA, as the sole general partner of each of those two partnerships, is
entitled to amend, and Pioneer USA will amend, the partnership agreement for the
partnership to eliminate the requirement for such fairness opinion for Pioneer
USA in connection with the proposed merger of the partnership.
59
PAYMENT OF EXPENSES AND FEES
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA estimate that the aggregate expenses and
fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships will be as follows:
Filing fee with SEC......................................... $ 20,500
Legal fees.................................................. 350,000
Accounting fees............................................. 100,000
Financial advisor fees...................................... 365,000
Independent petroleum consultant fees....................... 50,000
Printing and mailing fees................................... 850,000
Information agent fees and solicitation and tabulation
expenses.................................................. 225,000
Miscellaneous............................................... 39,500
----------
Total expenses.................................... $2,000,000
==========
Each participating partnership will pay its pro rata share, based on its
reserve value, of the aggregate estimated expenses and fees of the mergers of
all of the partnerships. Pioneer Parent will pay the pro rata share of each
nonparticipating partnership's estimated expenses and fees. Pioneer Parent has
also agreed to pay any expenses and fees actually incurred in excess of $2.0
million and if Pioneer Parent terminates or abandons the merger as to any
partnership, any expenses or fees allocated to that partnership. Pioneer Parent
and Pioneer USA have reduced the net working capital component of each
partnership's merger value by that partnership's pro rata share of the estimated
expenses and fees.
60
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following describes the material terms of the merger agreement that
Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, and the partnerships signed on September 20, 2001.
The full text of the merger agreement is attached as Appendix F to this document
and is incorporated by reference in this document. We encourage you to read the
entire merger agreement.
STRUCTURE; EFFECTIVE TIME
The merger agreement provides for the merger of each participating
partnership with and into Pioneer USA, with Pioneer USA surviving each merger.
Each merger will become effective at the time of the filing of the certificate
of merger for each participating partnership with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware and, for each participating partnership formed in Texas, with
the Secretary of State of the State of Texas. Each certificate of merger is
expected to be filed as soon as practicable after the last condition precedent
to the related merger set forth in the merger agreement has been satisfied or
waived. We estimate that the closing of the merger of each partnership will be
in the fourth quarter of 2001.
EFFECT OF THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
As a result of the merger of each participating partnership, the partners
in the partnership will have no continuing interest in that partnership.
Following the merger of each participating partnership, there will be no trading
market for the partnership interests in, and no further distributions paid to
the former partners of, the partnership. In addition, following the consummation
of the merger of each participating partnership that is also a reporting
partnership, the registration of any partnership interests in the partnership
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be terminated.
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PRIOR TO THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
From the date of the merger agreement until the effective time of the
merger of each partnership, each partnership is required:
- to conduct its business only in the ordinary course consistent with past
practice; and
- to use its reasonable best efforts:
- to preserve intact its business organization;
- to keep available the services of its officers, employees and
consultants; and
- to preserve its relationships with customers, suppliers and other
persons with which it has significant business dealings.
Pioneer USA has suspended cash distributions to the partners of each
partnership until after the effective time of the merger of the partnership.
Partners of each nonparticipating partnership will receive cash distributions
that are delayed for administrative purposes at about the same time Pioneer USA
mails certificates for Pioneer Parent common stock to the partners of each
participating partnership in payment of merger value for each partnership.
OTHER AGREEMENTS
Special Meetings; Proxies. Pioneer USA has agreed to cause the special
meeting of the limited partners of each partnership to be duly called and held
as soon as reasonably practicable for the purpose of voting on the approval and
adoption of the merger proposals for the partnership. Pioneer USA has also
agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to solicit from the limited partners
of each partnership proxies in favor of the merger proposals and to take all
other action necessary or advisable to secure any vote or consent of the limited
partners of the partnership required by the partnership agreement of the
partnership or the merger agreement or by law in connection with the merger of
the partnership.
Reasonable Commercial Efforts. Each party has agreed to use all reasonable
commercial efforts:
- to obtain in a timely manner all necessary waivers, consents and
approvals and to effect all necessary registrations and filings; and
- to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be
done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable laws and
regulations to consummate as promptly as practicable the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
61
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PIONEER PARENT, PIONEER USA AND EACH
PARTNERSHIP
The merger agreement contains substantially reciprocal representations and
warranties of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and each of the partnerships,
including the following matters:
- due organization or formation, standing, corporate or partnership power
and qualification;
- absence of any conflict, breach, notice requirement or default under
organizational documents and material agreements as a result of each
contemplated merger;
- authority to enter into and the validity and enforceability of the merger
agreement;
- absence of any material adverse change since June 30, 2001; and
- accuracy of information.
In addition, the merger agreement contains representations and warranties
by:
- each of the partnerships as to capitalization;
- each of Pioneer Parent and each reporting partnership, as to the absence
in its reports filed with the SEC of any untrue statement of a material
fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements in such reports not misleading;
- each of Pioneer Parent and each partnership, that its financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles applied on a consistent basis and fairly present
its financial condition and results of operations; and
- Pioneer USA as to its capacity as the managing or sole general partner of
each partnership and as the sole general partner of each nonmanaging
general partner.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party. The obligations of Pioneer
Parent, Pioneer USA and each partnership to complete the merger of the
partnership are dependent on the satisfaction of the following conditions:
- the merger agreement shall have been approved by the requisite vote of
the limited partners of the partnership entitled to vote at the
partnership's special meeting;
- Pioneer USA shall have received the fairness opinion from Stanger that,
as of the date of that opinion, that the merger value for each
partnership and the allocation of the merger value of the partnership (1)
to the limited partners of the partnership as a group, (2) to the general
partners of the partnership as a group, (3) to Pioneer USA as the
managing or sole general partner of the partnership, (4) to the
unaffiliated limited partners of the partnership as a group and (5) to
the unaffiliated limited partners of the nonmanaging general partner, if
any, of the partnership as a group, is fair to the unaffiliated limited
partners of the partnership and the unaffiliated limited partners of the
nonmanaging general partner, if any, of the partnership, from a financial
point of view, and such opinion shall not have been withdrawn;
- Pioneer USA shall have received the opinion of counsel to the limited
partners of each partnership that (1) neither the grant nor the exercise
of the right to approve the merger of the partnership by its limited
partners will adversely affect the federal income tax classification of
the partnership or any of its limited partners and (2) neither the grant
nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability;
- the absence of any law, regulation, judgment, injunction, order or decree
that would prohibit the consummation of any merger;
- the absence of any pending suit, action or proceeding challenging the
legality or any aspect of the merger of any partnership or the
transactions related to the merger;
- the authorization for listing on the New York Stock Exchange and the
Toronto Stock Exchange upon official issuance of notice shall have been
received for the shares of Pioneer Parent common stock to be issued upon
the merger of each partnership;
62
- all material filings and registrations with, and notifications to, third
parties shall have been made and all material approvals and consents of
third parties shall have been received; and
- the absence of any opinion of counsel that the exercise by the limited
partners of each partnership of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership is not permitted by state law.
Conditions to the Obligations of Pioneer Parent. The obligations of
Pioneer Parent to complete the merger of each partnership are further subject to
the satisfaction of the following conditions:
- each of Pioneer USA and each partnership having performed in all material
respects its agreements contained in the merger agreement; and
- the representations and warranties of Pioneer USA and each partnership
being true and correct in all material respects at the closing date of
the merger of the partnership as if made at that time unless they relate
to another specified time.
Conditions to the Obligations of Pioneer USA and Each Partnership. The
obligations of Pioneer USA and each partnership to complete the merger of the
partnership are further subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:
- Pioneer Parent having performed in all material respects its agreements
contained in the merger agreement; and
- the representations and warranties of Pioneer Parent being true and
correct in all material respects at the closing date of the merger of the
partnership as if made at that time unless they relate to another
specified time.
If we choose to waive a material condition to a merger, we will disclose
that waiver to the limited partners of the affected partnerships and resolicit
proxies for that merger.
TERMINATION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE MERGER OF ANY PARTNERSHIP
The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger of any partnership
abandoned at any time prior to the effective time, whether before or after
approval by the limited partners:
- by the mutual written consent of the parties;
- by any party, if:
- any applicable law, rule or regulation makes consummation of any merger
illegal or otherwise prohibited or any final and non-appealable
judgment, injunction, order or decree enjoining any party from
consummating any merger is entered;
- the requisite limited partner approval for a partnership is not
obtained by a vote at the special meeting for the partnership or at any
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting; or
- any suit, action or proceeding is filed against Pioneer Parent, Pioneer
USA, any partnership or any officer, director or affiliate of Pioneer
Parent or Pioneer USA challenging the legality or any aspect of the
merger of any partnership or the transactions related to the merger;
- by Pioneer Parent, if Pioneer USA or any partnership is in material
breach of the merger agreement;
- by Pioneer USA or any partnership as to that partnership's merger, if
Pioneer Parent is in material breach of the merger agreement;
- by Pioneer USA, if Pioneer USA's board of directors determines that
termination of the merger agreement is required in order for the board to
comply with its fiduciary duties; or
- by Pioneer Parent, if there shall have occurred any event, circumstance,
condition, development or occurrence causing, resulting in or having, or
reasonably expected to cause, result in or have, a material adverse
effect (1) on any partnership's business, operations, properties, taken
as a whole, condition, financial or otherwise, results of operations,
assets, taken as a whole, liabilities, cash flows or prospects, (2) on
market prices for oil and gas prevailing generally in the oil and gas
industry since the date of determination of the oil and gas commodity
prices used in the determination of the merger value for each
partnership, (3) on the price of Pioneer Parent common stock or (4) on
the oil and gas industry generally.
63
If the merger agreement is validly terminated or the merger of any
partnership is abandoned, none of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA nor any such
partnership shall have any liabilities or obligations to the other parties based
on the merger agreement or such merger except:
- Pioneer Parent will pay all expenses and fees of each partnership in
connection with the merger of that partnership incurred before the
termination of the merger agreement or abandonment of the merger of the
partnership; and
- a party will be liable if that party is in breach of the merger
agreement.
AMENDMENTS; WAIVERS
Any provision of the merger agreement may be amended prior to the effective
time if the amendment is in writing and signed by Pioneer Parent and Pioneer
USA; provided, that after the approval of the merger proposals by the limited
partners of each partnership, no amendment shall, without the further approval
of the limited partners of each partnership:
- adversely change the type or amount of, or the method of determining, the
consideration to be received in exchange for any partnership interests in
the partnership; or
- materially and adversely affect the rights of the limited partners of the
partnership, other than a termination of the merger agreement or
abandonment of the merger of the partnership.
Prior to the effective time, the parties may:
- extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations of the
parties;
- waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties in the
merger agreement or in a document delivered pursuant to the merger
agreement; and
- waive compliance with any agreement or condition in the merger agreement.
Any such extension or waiver will be valid only if it is in writing and signed
by the party against whom the extension or waiver is to be effective.
64
THE SPECIAL MEETINGS
TIME AND PLACE; PURPOSE
The special meeting of the limited partners of each partnership will be
held on December 20, 2001, at 10:00 a.m., at the Dallas Marriott Las Colinas
Hotel, 223 West Las Colinas Blvd., Irving, Texas 75039. The purpose of each
special meeting, and any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting for
each partnership, is for the limited partners of each partnership to consider
and vote on the following matters:
- A proposal to approve an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
September 20, 2001, among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and each of the
partnerships. Each participating partnership will merge with and into
Pioneer USA, with Pioneer USA surviving the merger. Each partnership
interest of a participating partnership will be converted into Pioneer
Parent common stock. The number of shares of common stock Pioneer Parent
will offer for all partnership interests of a participating partnership
will be based on (1) the participating partnership's merger value and (2)
the average closing price of the Pioneer Parent common stock, as reported
by the New York Stock Exchange, for the ten trading days ending three
business days before the initial date scheduled for the special meeting
for the partnership. The merger value for a participating partnership is
equal to the sum of the present value of estimated future net revenues
from the partnership's estimated oil and gas reserves and its net working
capital, in each case as of March 31, 2001, less its pro rata share,
based on its reserve value, of the estimated expenses and fees of the
mergers of all of the partnerships and less the cash distribution mailed
on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners. For purposes of
illustration in this document, we have calculated the number of shares to
be issued based on an assumed average closing price of $18.00 per share
of Pioneer Parent common stock. Prior to the date of the special meeting
for each partnership, we will update the number of shares to be issued
using the actual average closing price of Pioneer Parent common stock for
the ten trading days ending December 17, 2001, three business days before
December 20, 2001, the initial date of the special meeting. The Pioneer
Parent common stock will be allocated among the partners based on the
liquidation provisions of each partnership agreement. Pioneer Parent will
not issue fractional shares to any limited partner upon completion of the
merger of any partnership. Instead, Pioneer Parent will round any
fractional shares of Pioneer Parent common stock up to the nearest whole
share. Pioneer USA will not receive any Pioneer Parent common stock for
its partnership interests in the participating partnerships.
- A proposal to amend the partnership agreement of each partnership to
permit the partnership's merger with Pioneer USA. If the amendment is not
approved, that partnership cannot merge into Pioneer USA even if the
partners of that partnership approve the merger agreement.
- A proposal (A) to approve the opinion issued to Pioneer USA by Stradley
Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, relying as to matters
of Texas law on the opinion of Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas, on
behalf of the limited partners of each partnership that neither the grant
nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the partnership by
its limited partners (1) will result in the loss of any limited partner's
limited liability or (2) will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners and (B)
to approve the selection of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP and (as
to Texas law matters) Arter & Hadden LLP as special legal counsel for the
limited partners of each partnership for the limited purpose of rendering
the legal opinion.
Pioneer USA is also soliciting authorization to use its discretionary
voting authority to vote proxies in favor of any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting in order to solicit additional proxies.
The Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act and the Texas Revised
Limited Partnership Act require limited partner approval and adoption of the
merger agreement and the merger amendment. Generally, the partnership agreement
of each partnership requires that special legal counsel for the limited partners
render its legal opinion related to the limited partners' approval of the merger
of that partnership. See "The Merger of Each Partnership -- Legal Opinion for
Limited Partners" beginning on page 53 of this document.
PIONEER USA'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER OF
EACH PARTNERSHIP IS ADVISABLE, FAIR TO THE UNAFFILIATED LIMITED PARTNERS OF THE
PARTNERSHIP, AND IN THEIR BEST INTERESTS. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THE
UNAFFILIATED LIMITED PARTNERS VOTE FOR THE MERGER PROPOSALS FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP
IN WHICH THEY OWN AN INTEREST. ALTHOUGH PIONEER USA'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS
ATTEMPTED TO FULFILL ITS FIDUCIARY DUTIES TO THE LIMITED PARTNERS OF EACH
PARTNERSHIP, PIONEER USA'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAD CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN
EVALUATING EACH MERGER BECAUSE EACH MEMBER OF ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS ALSO AN
OFFICER OF PIONEER PARENT.
65
RECORD DATE; VOTING RIGHTS AND PROXIES
Only limited partners of record of each partnership at the close of
business on September 21, 2001 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
special meeting for the partnership in which they own partnership interests, or
any adjournments or postponements of such special meeting. Pioneer USA is
entitled to vote partnership interests it holds as a limited partner in all of
the partnerships except:
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.
Pioneer USA's affiliates are also entitled to vote partnership interests they
hold as limited partners in all but the seven partnerships listed above.
However, no affiliates of Pioneer USA own such interests. See "Ownership of
Partnership Interests" on page 71 of this document.
Limited partners of record of each partnership are entitled to vote at the
partnership's special meeting based on the limited partners' respective
percentage of partnership interests in the partnership. Each limited partner
will receive a proxy card for all partnerships in which that limited partner
holds partnership interests. The proxy card will indicate the amount of Pioneer
Parent common stock offered with respect to such partnership interests in each
partnership. Although the number of shares of Pioneer Parent common stock
offered as shown on the proxy card may change, the value of Pioneer Parent
common stock offered as shown on the proxy card will not be adjusted. The
percentage of partnership interests that a limited partner holds in a
partnership is determined by comparing the amount of the limited partner's
initial investment, including any additional assessments, in the partnership to
the total investment of all partners, including any additional assessments, in
the partnership. The aggregate initial investment, including any additional
assessments, in each of the partnerships by the limited partners is set forth in
Table 1 of Appendix A.
A limited partner of record may grant a proxy to vote for or against, or
may abstain from voting on, the merger proposals applicable to each of the
partnerships in which the limited partner holds partnership interests. To be
effective for purposes of granting a proxy to vote on the merger proposals
applicable to each partnership, a proxy card must be properly completed,
executed and delivered to Pioneer USA's information agent, in person or by mail,
telegraph, telex or facsimile before the special meeting for the partnership.
All partnership interests represented by properly executed proxies will, unless
these proxies have been previously revoked, be voted in accordance with the
instructions indicated in these proxies. If no instructions are indicated, the
partnership interests will be voted for approval and adoption of the merger
proposals. A properly executed proxy card for a partnership marked abstain is
counted as present for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a
quorum at the special meeting for the partnership, but will not be voted.
Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the merger
proposals.
Unrevoked proxies granted in the proxy cards for a partnership will be
voted at the special meeting for that partnership or at any adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting, if received by Pioneer USA's information
agent before the special meeting for the partnership. Proxies granted in the
proxy cards for a partnership will remain valid until the completion of the
special meeting for the partnership. Each partnership agreement requires that a
meeting be held within 60 days of the date of mailing of the notice of meeting.
None of the partnership agreements specifically addresses, and Pioneer USA has
not sought any opinions of counsel as to, whether proxies may be voted at a
meeting originally scheduled to be held within 60 days of the sending of the
notice and adjourned or postponed to a date more than 60 days after the date of
notice. Pioneer USA will not accept a vote of the limited partners of any
partnership in such circumstances unless it receives an opinion of counsel that
such a vote would be valid.
The inspector of election appointed for the special meeting for each
partnership will tabulate the votes cast by proxy or in person at the special
meeting.
66
REVOCATION OF PROXIES
You may revoke a proxy you have given at any time before that proxy is
voted at the special meeting for each partnership in which you own an interest
by:
- giving written notice of revocation to Pioneer USA;
- signing and returning a later dated proxy; or
- voting in person at the special meeting.
Your notice of revocation will not be effective until Pioneer USA receives it at
or before the special meeting for each partnership in which you own an interest.
Your presence at any such special meeting will not automatically revoke your
proxy in a proxy card. Revocation during any such special meeting will not
affect votes previously taken.
You may deliver your written notice of revocation in person or by mail,
telegraph, telex, or facsimile. Any written notice of revocation must specify
your name and limited partner number as shown on your proxy card and the name of
the partnership to which your revocation relates.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
We are soliciting your proxy pursuant to this document. The aggregate
estimated expenses and fees of the merger of each partnership that have been
allocated to each partnership include those incurred in connection with
solicitation of the enclosed proxy as described below.
Pioneer USA has retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in the
solicitation of proxies from the limited partners of each partnership. The total
fees and expenses of D.F. King & Co., Inc. are estimated to aggregate $225,000
and have been allocated among the partnerships, on a pro rata basis, based on
each partnership's reserve value. In addition to solicitation by use of the
mail, proxies may be solicited by D.F. King & Co., Inc. and by directors,
officers and employees of Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA in person or by
telephone, telegram, facsimile or e-mail. The directors, officers and employees
will not be additionally compensated, but may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation.
Arrangements may also be made with other brokerage firms, banks,
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of proxy solicitation
materials to owners of limited partnership interests held of record by those
persons. Each partnership will pay its pro rata share, based on its reserve
value, of those persons' reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding those
materials.
Pioneer USA has also retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to act as information
agent to perform consulting, administration and clerical work with respect to
the merger of each partnership. Pioneer USA has agreed to indemnify D.F. King &
Co., Inc. against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal
securities laws. D.F. King & Co., Inc. will also be responsible for the receipt
and tabulation of the proxy cards. The fees and expenses of D.F. King & Co.,
Inc. for its services as information agent and tabulator are included in the
aggregate amount set forth above.
We intend to mail certificates representing shares of Pioneer Parent common
stock to the partners of record of each participating partnership promptly after
completing the merger of that partnership. Certificates representing partnership
interests will be automatically canceled, and you will not have to surrender
your certificates to receive the Pioneer Parent common stock.
QUORUM
The presence in person or by properly executed proxy of a majority of
limited partnership interests entitled to vote in each partnership is necessary
to constitute a quorum at that partnership's special meeting.
If a quorum is not present at any special meeting, the limited partners
entitled to vote who are present or represented by proxy at that special meeting
may adjourn or postpone that special meeting without notice until a quorum is
present. If a quorum is present at the adjourned or postponed meeting, any
business may be transacted that may have been transacted at the special meeting
had a quorum originally been present. If the adjournment or postponement is for
more than 30 days or if after the adjournment or postponement a new record date
is fixed for the adjourned or postponed meeting, a notice of the adjourned or
postponed meeting shall be given to each limited partner of record entitled to
vote at the adjourned or postponed meeting. We are soliciting your proxy to vote
in favor of any motion to adjourn or postpone the special meeting of any
partnership if, prior to the special meeting, we have not received sufficient
proxies to approve
67
the merger of the partnership as described in this document. If we receive
sufficient proxies to vote in favor of adjourning the meetings for this reason,
this process will be repeated at any adjourned or postponed meeting until
sufficient proxies to vote in favor of the merger of the partnership have been
received or it appears that sufficient proxies will not be received.
REQUIRED VOTE; BROKER NON-VOTES
Approval of the merger proposals for each partnership requires the
affirmative vote of the limited partners holding a majority of limited
partnership interests in that partnership, except that Parker & Parsley 91-A,
L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. each require the favorable vote of the
holders, other than Pioneer USA, of 66 2/3% of its limited partnership interests
to approve those merger proposals. Pioneer USA is entitled to vote its
partnership interests on the merger proposals for each partnership except for
the partnerships set forth under "The Special Meetings -- Record Date; Voting
Rights and Proxies" on page 66. As a result, for each partnership in which
Pioneer USA is entitled to vote, approval of at least a majority, and for Parker
& Parsley 91-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P., at least 66 2/3%, of the
unaffiliated limited partners is not required to approve the merger proposals.
However, for each partnership in which Pioneer Parent is not entitled to vote,
the approval of the unaffiliated limited partners is required to approve the
merger proposals.
Brokers, if any, who hold partnership interests in street name for
customers have the authority to vote on "routine" proposals when they have not
received instructions from beneficial owners. However, these brokers are
precluded from exercising their voting discretion with respect to the approval
and adoption of non-routine matters such as the merger proposals and thus,
absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of the partnership
interests, brokers are not empowered to vote the partnership interests with
respect to the merger proposals. These "broker non-votes" will have the effect
of a vote against the merger proposals.
PARTICIPATION BY ASSIGNEES
Pioneer USA has the discretionary authority granted to it under each
partnership agreement to withhold its consent to the substitution of any
assignees as partners of the partnership. To facilitate the notification given
to limited partners of each partnership about the merger of the partnership,
Pioneer USA intends to exercise that authority and withhold its consent to the
substitution of any assignees as partners of the partnership from September 21,
2001 until the earlier to occur of the closing date of the merger of the
partnership, or the termination or abandonment of the transaction by Pioneer
Parent and Pioneer USA.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SOME LIMITED PARTNERS
Pioneer USA may require that any proxy card executed by an entity, such as
a trust, corporation, or partnership, be accompanied by evidence or an opinion
of counsel that such entity:
- has met all requirements of its governing instruments; and
- is authorized to execute and deliver the proxy card under the laws of the
jurisdiction under which the entity was organized.
Pioneer USA will require the named trustee and the beneficial owner of
trusts, including individual retirement accounts, to execute the proxy card. In
some cases, Pioneer USA may provide a limited partner with an envelope, pre-
addressed to his individual retirement account trustee, so that the limited
partner may forward his executed proxy card to the trustee for the trustee's
signature, if necessary, and subsequent delivery to Pioneer USA. Delivery of a
proxy card to the trustee, with or without the use of a pre-addressed envelope,
and delivery of a proxy card from the trustee to Pioneer USA are at the risk of
the limited partner.
VALIDITY OF PROXY CARDS
A proxy card will not be valid unless it has been properly completed and
executed and timely delivered to Pioneer USA's information agent with all other
required documents. Pioneer USA will determine all questions as to the validity,
form, eligibility, time of receipt and acceptance of a proxy card and its
determination will be final and binding. Pioneer USA's interpretation of the
terms and conditions of the merger of each partnership, including the
instructions for the proxy card, will also be final and binding.
A proxy card will not be valid until any irregularities have been cured or
waived. If Pioneer USA does not waive the irregularities, it will return the
defective proxy card to the limited partner as soon as practicable. Pioneer USA
is under no duty to give notification of defects in a proxy card and will incur
no liability if it fails to give such notification.
68
Delivery of a proxy card is at the risk of the limited partner. A proxy
card will be effective for purposes of voting only when it is actually received
by Pioneer USA's information agent. To ensure receipt of the proxy card and all
other required documents, Pioneer USA suggests that limited partners use
overnight courier delivery or certified or registered mail, return receipt
requested.
LOCAL LAWS
Proxy solicitations will not be made to, nor will proxy cards be accepted
from, limited partners of any partnership in any jurisdiction in which the
solicitations would not be in compliance with federal and state securities or
other laws.
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
The table below sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the
reported high and low closing prices of Pioneer Parent common stock as reported
on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transaction Tape, in each case based on
published financial sources. Pioneer Parent's board of directors did not declare
dividends to the holders of Pioneer Parent common stock during 1999, 2000 or the
six months ended June 30, 2001. The determination of the amount of future cash
dividends, if any, to be declared and paid is in the sole discretion of Pioneer
Parent's board of directors and will depend on the following factors:
- Pioneer Parent's financial condition;
- earnings and funds from operations;
- the level of Pioneer Parent's capital and exploration expenditures;
- dividend restrictions in Pioneer Parent's financing agreements;
- Pioneer Parent's future business prospects; and
- other matters that Pioneer Parent's board of directors deems relevant.
None of the partnership interests of any partnership are traded on a
national stock exchange or in any other significant market. No liquid market
exists for interests in any of the partnerships. See Table 15 of Appendix A for
historical information about recent trades per $1,000 limited partner investment
in each partnership for the seven months ended July 31, 2001 and the years ended
December 31, 2000 and 1999. The average quarterly cash distributions per $1,000
limited partner investment in each partnership for 1999, 2000 and the
year-to-date in 2001 are set forth in Table 7 of Appendix A.
On April 16, 2001, the last full trading day prior to the announcement of
the proposed merger of each partnership, Pioneer Parent common stock closed at
$17.27 per share. On October 9, 2001, Pioneer Parent common stock closed at
$15.58 per share.
PIONEER PARENT
COMMON STOCK
MARKET PRICE
---------------
HIGH LOW
------ ------
2001
Fourth quarter (through October 9, 2001).................. $15.62 $13.22
Third quarter............................................. 19.38 12.62
Second quarter............................................ 23.05 14.30
First quarter............................................. 20.24 15.45
2000
Fourth quarter............................................ 20.63 12.44
Third quarter............................................. 16.06 10.63
Second quarter............................................ 15.63 9.00
First quarter............................................. 10.75 6.75
1999
Fourth quarter............................................ 11.50 7.63
Third quarter............................................. 12.81 9.38
Second quarter............................................ 13.19 7.06
First quarter............................................. 9.75 5.00
We urge the limited partners of each partnership to obtain current market
quotations prior to making any decision with respect to the merger of the
partnership.
69
INTERESTS OF PIONEER PARENT, PIONEER USA
AND THEIR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
A number of conflicts of interest are inherent in the relationships among
each partnership, Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and their respective directors and
officers.
CONFLICTING DUTIES OF PIONEER USA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL PARTNER
Pioneer USA, as general partner of each partnership, has a duty to manage
each partnership in the best interests of the limited partners. Pioneer USA also
has a duty to operate its business for the benefit of its sole stockholder,
Pioneer Parent. Consequently, Pioneer USA's duties to the limited partners of
each partnership may conflict with its duties to Pioneer Parent.
The members of the board of directors of Pioneer USA have a duty to cause
Pioneer USA to manage each partnership in the best interests of the limited
partners. All members of the board of directors of Pioneer USA are officers of
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA. Thus, the members of the board of directors of
Pioneer USA have duties to operate Pioneer USA's business for the benefit of its
sole stockholder, Pioneer Parent, and, as officers of Pioneer Parent, to operate
Pioneer Parent's business in its best interests. Consequently, the duties of the
members of the board of directors of Pioneer USA to the limited partners may
conflict with the duties of those members to Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and
their stockholders.
Neither Pioneer Parent nor Pioneer USA retained an independent
representative to negotiate on behalf of the limited partners of each
partnership because:
- neither the partnership agreement for any partnership nor any applicable
law provides for any procedure to identify and select an independent
representative, unless each limited partner of the partnership agrees to
the independent representative;
- Pioneer USA, as sole or managing general partner of each partnership,
still has its fiduciary duty to the limited partners; and
- it would be (1) cost-prohibitive to find one or more persons to represent
the limited partners in all of the partnerships because no one other than
Pioneer USA owns an interest in all of the partnerships and (2)
impractical to have 46 independent representatives.
PIONEER USA'S EMPLOYEES PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE PARTNERSHIPS
None of the partnerships currently has any employees. Each partnership
relies on Pioneer USA's personnel. Pioneer USA provides all management functions
on behalf of each partnership. Therefore, each partnership currently competes
with Pioneer USA for the time and resources of Pioneer USA's employees.
FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The directors and officers of Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA have equity
interests in Pioneer Parent through stock ownership, stock options and other
stock-based compensation, but do not have financial or equity interests in any
partnership. See "Ownership of Partnership Interests" on page 71. The boards of
directors of Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA believe that any economic benefit
their directors and officers may obtain from the merger of each partnership, or
the mergers of all of the partnerships in the aggregate, will be minimal, if
any, and will not result in a material economic benefit, if any, to their
directors and officers individually.
THE PARTNERSHIPS PAY OPERATOR FEES TO PIONEER USA
Pioneer USA operates most of each partnership's wells. Each partnership has
entered into one or more standard industry operating agreements with Pioneer
USA. Those operating agreements establish the base fee paid by the partnership
to Pioneer USA for its lease operating services. That base fee adjusts annually
based on a rate established by the Council of Petroleum Accountants Society, or
COPAS, for the oil and gas industry.
70
OWNERSHIP OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
Pioneer Parent does not directly own any partnership interests in any
partnership. Pioneer Parent beneficially owns all of Pioneer USA's partnership
interests in each partnership. Table 6 of Appendix A to this document contains
the voting percentage as of July 31, 2001, of the outstanding limited
partnership interests for each partnership that are beneficially owned by
Pioneer USA as a limited partner. As of July 31, 2001, no person or entity known
by Pioneer USA beneficially owns more than 5% of the outstanding limited
partnership interests in any partnership, except in Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.,
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. and Parker and Parsley 82-III, Ltd. In those
partnerships, Pioneer USA repurchased and now owns partnership interests
representing the following beneficial ownership percentages:
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................................ 5.84%
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................................ 11.71%
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .............................. 5.97%
Pioneer USA has sole investment and voting power with respect to partnership
interests it beneficially owns.
Except as set forth above, none of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, or, to the
knowledge of Pioneer USA, any of their directors or executive officers, or any
associate or majority-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA or any
such director or officer:
- beneficially owns any partnership interests of any partnership; or
- has effected any transactions in any partnership interests of any
partnership during the past 60 days.
TRANSACTIONS AMONG ANY PARTNERSHIP, PIONEER PARENT,
PIONEER USA AND THEIR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Except as described in this document, including the supplements for each
partnership, there have not been any transactions, negotiations or material
contacts between Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, any of their respective
subsidiaries, or, to the knowledge of Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA, any
director or executive officer of Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA or any associate
of any such persons, on the one hand, and any partnership or any of its general
partners, including Pioneer USA, directors, officers or affiliates, on the other
hand, that are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the SEC. Except as described in this document, none of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer
USA, or, to the knowledge of Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA, any director or
executive officer of Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA, has any agreement,
arrangement or understanding with any other person with respect to any
securities of any partnership.
During March 2001, Pioneer Parent offered to acquire all of the direct oil
and gas interests owned by some former officers and employees of Pioneer Parent
and Pioneer USA in properties in which Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA own
interests. The merger value for the direct oil and gas interests was equal to
the present value of estimated future net revenues from the oil and gas reserves
attributable to the interests, as of March 31, 2001. In determining the present
value, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA used (1) a five-year NYMEX futures price
for oil and gas as of March 2001 with prices held constant after year five at
the year five price, less standard industry adjustments, (2) historical
operating costs adjusted only for those items affected by commodity prices, such
as production taxes and ad valorem taxes, and (3) a 13.5% discount rate. The
consideration offered in the purchases of the direct oil and gas interests was
all cash since offering and registering Pioneer Parent common stock in those
purchases was cost-prohibitive due to the small size of such transactions.
Additionally, in December 2000, Pioneer Parent received the approval of the
partners of 13 employee limited partnerships to merge with Pioneer USA for total
merger consideration of $2.0 million. Of the total merger consideration, $0.3
million was paid to current Pioneer Parent employees. The merger value of each
employee partnership was equal to the sum of the present value of estimated
future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil and gas reserves and
its net working capital, in each case as of September 30, 2000, less the cash
distributions on October 15, 2000 and November 15, 2000, by that partnership to
its partners. In determining the present value, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA
used (1) a five-year NYMEX futures price for oil and gas as of August 25, 2000
with prices held constant after year five at the year five price, less standard
industry adjustments, (2) historical operating costs adjusted only for those
items affected by commodity prices, such as production taxes and ad valorem
taxes, and (3) a 13.5% discount rate. Using the same parameters as described
above, Pioneer Parent purchased all of the direct oil and gas interests held by
Scott D. Sheffield, its chairman of the board of directors and chief executive
officer, for $0.2 million during October 2000. The consideration paid in the
mergers of the employee limited partnerships and the purchase of Mr. Sheffield's
direct oil and gas interests was all cash. As with the purchases of the direct
oil and gas interests described above, offering and
71
registering Pioneer Parent common stock in these transactions was
cost-prohibitive due to the small size of such transactions.
If you approve the merger of each partnership in which you own an interest,
there are various ways that Pioneer USA may use the properties. Pioneer USA may
continue to operate the properties, it may sell the properties to third parties,
including a royalty trust, or it may spin off the properties to its stockholder.
Although Pioneer USA plans to operate the properties in the immediate future
following completion of the merger of each partnership, it has not decided how
to use the properties in the long-term.
72
MANAGEMENT
PIONEER PARENT
The following information sets forth the age, business experience during
the past five years, positions and offices with Pioneer Parent, and periods of
service of each director and executive officer of Pioneer Parent.
NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------
Scott D. Sheffield................... 48 Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief
Executive Officer
Timothy L. Dove...................... 44 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dennis E. Fagerstone................. 52 Executive Vice President
Mark L. Withrow...................... 53 Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Danny L. Kellum...................... 46 Executive Vice President -- Domestic Operations
James R. Baroffio.................... 69 Director
R. Hartwell Gardner.................. 66 Director
James L. Houghton.................... 70 Director
Jerry P. Jones....................... 69 Director
Charles E. Ramsey, Jr. .............. 64 Director
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield, a distinguished graduate of the
University of Texas with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering,
has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Pioneer Parent since August
1999 and the President and Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer Parent since
August 1997. Mr. Sheffield was the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company from October
1990 until August 1997. He was the President and a director of Parker & Parsley
Petroleum Company from May 1990 until October 1990. Mr. Sheffield was the sole
director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company, a predecessor of
Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. Mr.
Sheffield served as Vice President -- Engineering of Parker & Parsley
Development Company from September 1981 until April 1985, when he was elected
President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was elected Chairman of
the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley
Development Company. Before joining Parker & Parsley Development Company 's
predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and reservoir engineer
for Amoco Production Company.
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove, a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of
Technology with a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering and the
University of Chicago with an M.B.A., has been Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Pioneer Parent since February 2000. He was Executive
Vice President -- Business Development of Pioneer Parent from August 1997 until
February 2000. Mr. Dove joined Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company in May 1994 as
Vice President -- International and was promoted to Senior Vice
President -- Business Development in October 1996, in which position he served
until August 1997. Before joining Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company, Mr. Dove
was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus Energy Corp.,
in various capacities in international exploration and production, marketing,
refining, and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, has been an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer Parent since August 1997. Mr. Fagerstone served as Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. from March 1997 until August
1997. Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
of MESA Inc. from October 1996 to February 1997, and served as Vice
President -- Exploration and Production of MESA Inc. from May 1991 to October
1996. Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President -- Operations of MESA Inc. from
June 1988 until May 1991.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a
J.D. degree, has been the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary of Pioneer Parent since August 1997. He served as Vice
President -- General Counsel of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company from February
1991 until January 1995, and served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel
of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company from January 1995 until August 1997. He
was Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company's Secretary from August 1992 until August
1997. Mr. Withrow joined Parker & Parsley Development Company in January 1991.
Before joining Parker & Parsley Development Company, Mr. Withrow was the
managing partner of the law firm of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald,
Midland, Texas.
73
Danny L. Kellum. Mr. Kellum, a graduate of Texas Tech University with a
Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering in 1979, has been Executive
Vice President -- Domestic Operations of Pioneer Parent since May 2000. From
January 2000 until May 2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President -- Domestic
Operations. From August 1997 until December 1999, Mr. Kellum served as Vice
President -- Permian Division. Mr. Kellum served as Spraberry District Manager
for Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company from 1989 until 1994 and as Vice
President of the Spraberry and Permian Divisions for Parker & Parsley Petroleum
Company from 1994 until August 1997. He joined Parker & Parsley Petroleum
Company in 1981 as Operations Engineer after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
James R. Baroffio. Dr. Baroffio received a B.A. in Geology at the College
of Wooster, Ohio, an M.S. in Geology at Ohio State University, and a Ph.D. in
Geology at the University of Illinois. Before becoming a director of Pioneer
Parent in December 1997, Dr. Baroffio enjoyed a long career with Standard Oil
Company of California, the predecessor of Chevron Corporation, where he served
as President, Chevron Research and Technology Center from 1980 to 1985 and
eventually retired as President of Chevron Canada Resources in 1994. Dr.
Baroffio was a member of the Board of Directors of the Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas
Association and Chairman of the U.S. National Committee of the World Petroleum
Congress. His community leadership positions included membership on the Board of
Directors of Glenbow Museum and the Nature Conservancy of Canada, as well as
serving as President of the Alberta Nature Conservancy.
R. Hartwell Gardner. Mr. Gardner, a graduate of Colgate University with a
Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and Harvard University with an M.B.A.,
became a director of Pioneer Parent in August 1997. He served as a director of
Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company from November 1995 until August 1997. Until
his retirement in September 1995, Mr. Gardner was the Treasurer of Mobil Oil
Corporation and Mobil Corporation from 1974 and 1976, respectively. Mr. Gardner
is a member of the Financial Executives Institute of which he served as Chairman
in 1986/1987 and is a Director of Oil Investment Corporation Ltd. and Oil
Casualty Investment Corporation Ltd., Pembroke, Bermuda.
James L. Houghton. Mr. Houghton is a certified public accountant and a
graduate of Kansas University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting,
as well as a Bachelor of Law degree. Mr. Houghton has served as a director of
Pioneer Parent since August 1997, and as a director of Parker & Parsley
Petroleum Company from October 1991 until August 1997. Until his retirement in
September 1991, Mr. Houghton was the lead oil and gas tax specialist for the
accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP, was a member of Ernst & Young's National
Energy Group, and had served as its Southwest Regional Director of Tax. Mr.
Houghton is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants,
a member of the Oklahoma Society of Certified Public Accountants, a former
Chairman of its Federal and Oklahoma Taxation Committee and past President of
the Oklahoma Institute of Taxation. He has also served as a Director for the
Independent Petroleum Association of America and as a member of its Tax
Committee.
Jerry P. Jones. Mr. Jones earned a Bachelor of Science degree from West
Texas State College in 1953 and a Bachelor of Law degree from the University of
Texas School of Law in 1959. Mr. Jones has served as a director of Pioneer
Parent since August 1997, and as a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum
Company from May 1991 until August 1997. Mr. Jones has been an attorney with the
law firm of Thompson & Knight, P.C., Dallas, Texas, since September 1959 and was
a shareholder in that firm until January 1998, when he retired and became of
counsel to the firm. Mr. Jones specialized in civil litigation, especially in
the area of energy disputes.
Charles E. Ramsey, Jr. Mr. Ramsey is a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a Petroleum Engineering degree and a graduate of the Smaller Company
Management program at the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.
Mr. Ramsey has served as a director of Pioneer Parent since August 1997. Mr.
Ramsey served as a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company from October
1991 until August 1997. Since October 1991, he has operated Ramsey Energy LLC,
an independent management and financial consulting firm. From June 1958 until
June 1986, Mr. Ramsey held various engineering and management positions in the
oil and gas industry and, for six years before October 1991, was a Senior Vice
President in the Corporate Finance Department of Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. in
Dallas, Texas. His industry experience includes 12 years of senior management
experience in the positions of President, Chief Executive Officer and Executive
Officer and Executive Vice President of May Petroleum Inc. Mr. Ramsey is also a
former director of MBank Dallas, the Dallas Petroleum Club and Lear Petroleum
Corporation.
74
PIONEER USA
The following information sets forth the age, business experience during
the past five years, positions and offices with Pioneer USA, and periods of
service of each director and executive officer of Pioneer USA.
NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------
Timothy L. Dove.................................. 44 Director, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Dennis E. Fagerstone............................. 52 Director and Executive Vice President
Mark L. Withrow.................................. 53 Director, Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
Danny L. Kellum.................................. 46 Director and Executive Vice President
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove has been a Director of Pioneer USA since August
1997 and has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Pioneer USA since February 2000. He was the Executive Vice President -- Business
Development of Pioneer USA from August 1997 until February 2000. He served as a
Director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum USA, Inc. from June 1997 until August
1997. He was a Senior Vice President of Parker & Parsley Petroleum USA, Inc.
from October 1996 until August 1997. He was a Vice President of Parker & Parsley
Petroleum USA, Inc. from December 1995 until October 1996. Mr. Dove's other
business experience and biographical information are set forth above under
"Management -- Pioneer Parent."
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone has been a Director and an Executive
Vice President of Pioneer USA since August 1997. Mr. Fagerstone's other business
experience and biographical information are set forth above under
"Management -- Pioneer Parent."
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow has been a Director of Pioneer USA since
August 1997. He became an Executive Vice President, the General Counsel and the
Secretary of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as a Director of Parker &
Parsley Petroleum USA, Inc. from January 1996 until August 1997. He was a Senior
Vice President and the Secretary of Parker & Parsley Petroleum USA, Inc. from
January 1995 until August 1997. He was a Vice President and the Secretary of
Parker & Parsley Petroleum USA, Inc. from December 1993 until January 1995. He
was a Vice President of Parker & Parsley Petroleum USA, Inc. from January 1991
until December 1993. Mr. Withrow's other business experience and biographical
information are set forth above under "Management -- Pioneer Parent."
Danny L. Kellum. Mr. Kellum has been a Director of Pioneer USA since
February 2000, and has been Executive Vice President of Pioneer USA since May
2000. He served as Vice President -- Domestic Operations of Pioneer USA from
January 2000 until May 2000, as Vice President -- Permian Division of Pioneer
USA from April 1998 until December 1999 and as Vice President -- Spraberry
Division of Pioneer USA from December 1997 until March 1998. Mr. Kellum's other
business experience and biographical information are set forth above under
"Management -- Pioneer Parent."
PIONEER PARENT
Pioneer Parent is a large independent exploration and production company
with total proved reserves equivalent to 3.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas,
or 628 million barrels of oil. Pioneer Parent's proved reserves are balanced
equally between natural gas and oil, and Pioneer Parent has a
reserves-to-production ratio of 14 years. Three core areas in the United States
comprise 67% of Pioneer Parent's reserve base: the Hugoton gas field, the West
Panhandle gas field, and the Spraberry oil and natural gas field. Pioneer Parent
also has domestic properties in East Texas, the Gulf Coast, and the offshore
Gulf of Mexico as well as a significant international presence through its
properties in Argentina, Canada, South Africa, and Gabon.
Pioneer Parent seeks to increase net asset value and production by
combining lower risk development drilling with higher risk exploration activity.
Pioneer Parent has identified over 1,700 development drilling locations on its
properties in the U.S., Argentina and Canada. Approximately 76% of the
identified 1,700 development drilling locations have proved undeveloped reserves
attributable to them. Pioneer Parent's exploration program is focused in the
deepwater Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf Coast shelf, South Africa and Gabon. Pioneer
Parent expects significant new production from the deepwater Gulf of Mexico and
South Africa in 2002 and 2003 as it builds on its recent exploration successes
in those areas. The production from Pioneer Parent's long-lived reserves in the
Spraberry, Hugoton and West Panhandle fields are expected to provide stable cash
flows to fund Pioneer Parent's development and exploration activities.
75
During 2000, Pioneer Parent spent $340 million for capital expenditures to
add 437 billion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves. As a consequence,
in 2000 Pioneer Parent replaced 167% of its production at an acquisition and
finding cost of $.78 per Mcf equivalent. Pioneer Parent's acquisition and
finding cost is the result obtained by dividing total costs incurred by the sum
of revisions of previous estimates, purchases of minerals-in-place and new
discoveries and extensions. Pioneer Parent drilled 296 wells with 90% success
worldwide, including 83 exploration and extension wells with 73% success.
For 2001, Pioneer Parent has budgeted $480 million of capital expenditures,
a 41% increase over 2000 capital expenditures but slightly less than expected
available cash flow. Approximately 73% of the 2001 capital expenditure budget is
for development activities with the remaining 27% for exploration. Pioneer
Parent plans to drill approximately 460 development wells and 26 exploratory
wells in its 2001 program, and approximately 65% of the capital expenditures
will be for drilling activities in the U.S.
KEY PROJECTS TO INCREASE PRODUCTION
Pioneer Parent expects to increase its production of oil and gas from
current levels by 25% to 30% on a gas equivalent basis by early to mid 2003,
primarily from four projects. The production increases anticipated from the four
projects are derived from currently booked proved undeveloped reserves. The
projects in general build on Pioneer Parent's recent exploration successes.
- The Canyon Express project is a joint development of three deepwater Gulf
of Mexico discoveries, including Pioneer Parent's Aconcagua and Camden
Hills fields. The project is being developed with a capacity to deliver
500 million cubic feet of natural gas per day by the summer of 2002.
Pioneer Parent owns an 18% interest in the Canyon Express project and
expects that production from the project will increase Pioneer Parent's
North American natural gas production by 30% from current levels.
- Pioneer Parent's first well in offshore South Africa confirmed the
presence of commercial oil reserves and resulted in Pioneer Parent's
plans to develop the Sable oil field. First production from the field is
expected in late 2002 or early 2003 at daily rates of 25 to 30 thousand
barrels per day. Pioneer Parent has a 40% working interest in the field,
and production from the project is expected to increase Pioneer Parent's
total oil production by more than 20%. Pioneer Parent has also discovered
oil and natural gas at its Boomslang prospect in offshore South Africa.
- The Devils Tower discovery was Pioneer Parent's second in the deepwater
Gulf of Mexico. The oil field has been successfully appraised, and
development plans call for first production in early 2003. Pioneer Parent
has a 25% working interest in the field, and production from the field is
expected to increase Pioneer Parent's total oil production by
approximately 20% from current levels.
MORE INFORMATION
A more complete description of Pioneer Parent and its business is found in
the reports that Pioneer Parent files with the SEC. Please see "Where You Can
Find More Information" on the inside front cover page of this document. Pioneer
Parent's business, and its expectations about its future, are subject to many
risks. Please also read "Risks Associated with an Investment in Pioneer Parent"
under the caption "Risk Factors" beginning on page 20 of this document.
76
THE PARTNERSHIPS
GENERAL
Pioneer USA's predecessor, Parker & Parsley Petroleum USA, Inc. or its
predecessors or affiliates, sponsored each partnership. As a result of the
merger of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company and MESA Inc. to form Pioneer
Parent on August 7, 1997, Pioneer USA became the managing or sole general
partner of each partnership.
Appendix A to this document sets forth information about each partnership,
including proved reserves as of December 31, 2000, estimated reserves as of
March 31, 2001, oil and gas production, average sales prices and production
costs, productive wells and developed acreage, and historical cash
distributions. In addition, the supplement for each partnership constitutes an
integral part of this document. You should read Appendix A and the supplement
carefully in their entirety.
THE DRILLING PARTNERSHIPS
The drilling partnerships consist of the following 43 limited partnerships
that were formed from 1981 through 1991:
STATE OF
NAME FORMATION
---- ---------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd............... Texas
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd........ Texas
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd............................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd............................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.................................. Texas
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P............................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.................................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P............................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 88-B L.P................................... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P............................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.................................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P............................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.................................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P............................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.................................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P............................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.................................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P............................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.................................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P............................ Delaware
77
STATE OF
NAME FORMATION
---- ---------
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.................................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P...... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.................................. Delaware
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.................................. Delaware
Each drilling partnership was formed to establish long-lived oil and gas
reserves primarily by drilling low-risk development wells in the Spraberry field
of the Permian Basin of West Texas. The oil and gas properties of each drilling
partnership consist primarily of leasehold interests in producing properties
located in Texas. The partners of a drilling partnership received a tax benefit
from drilling activities in the partnership's first year. Subsequently, each
drilling partnership has regularly distributed its net cash flow. As of the date
of this document, each drilling partnership has expended all of its initial
capital contributions.
For a discussion of transactions between each drilling partnership and
Pioneer USA, see the notes to the financial statements of each drilling
partnership included in the supplement for the partnership.
THE INCOME PARTNERSHIPS
The income partnerships consist of the following three limited partnerships
that were formed in 1987 and 1988:
STATE OF
NAME FORMATION
---- ---------
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd............. Texas
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd............. Texas
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P............. Delaware
The primary objective of each income partnership was to acquire long-lived,
producing oil and gas properties in the Spraberry field of the Permian Basin of
West Texas. Subsequently, each income partnership has regularly distributed its
net cash flow. As of the date of this document, each income partnership has
expended all of its initial capital contributions.
For a discussion of transactions between each income partnership and
Pioneer USA, see the notes to the financial statements of each income
partnership included in the supplement for the partnership.
78
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PARTNERS
GENERAL
The rights of Pioneer Parent stockholders are currently governed by the
Delaware General Corporation Law and the certificate of incorporation and bylaws
of Pioneer Parent. The rights of the limited partners of each partnership are
currently governed by the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act or
the Texas Revised Limited Partnership Act and, in either case, the partnership
agreement of the partnership. Accordingly, on completion of the merger of each
partnership, the rights of Pioneer Parent stockholders and of limited partners
who become Pioneer Parent stockholders in the merger of their partnerships will
be governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law, Pioneer Parent's
certificate of incorporation and Pioneer Parent's bylaws. The following is a
summary of the material differences between the current rights of Pioneer Parent
stockholders and those of the limited partners of each partnership.
The following summary of the material differences between the Pioneer
Parent certificate of incorporation, the Pioneer Parent bylaws and the
partnership agreement for each partnership may not contain all the information
that is important to you. To review all provisions and differences of such
documents in full detail, please read the full text of these documents, the
Delaware General Corporation Law, the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited
Partnership Act and the Texas Revised Limited Partnership Act. Copies of the
Pioneer Parent certificate of incorporation, the Pioneer Parent bylaws and the
partnership agreement for each partnership in which you own an interest will be
sent to you upon request. For information on how these documents may be
obtained, see "Where You Can Find More Information" on the inside front cover
page of this document.
Pioneer Parent's certificate of incorporation and bylaws will not be
amended in conjunction with the merger of any partnership.
79
SUMMARY COMPARISON OF TERMS OF SHARES OF PIONEER PARENT COMMON STOCK AND
PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIQUIDITY AND MARKETABILITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares of Pioneer Parent common stock are The partnership interests of each partnership may
generally freely transferable. The shares of not be transferred if, in the opinion of counsel
Pioneer Parent common stock that are currently to the partnership, (1) such transfers would
outstanding are traded on the New York Stock result in the termination of the partnership for
Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange, and the federal income tax purposes under Section 708 of
shares of Pioneer Parent common stock to be issued the Internal Revenue Code, or (2) such transfers
in the merger of each participating partnership may not be effected without registration under the
have been approved for listing on the New York Securities Act of 1933 or would result in the
Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange upon violation of any applicable state securities laws.
official notice of issuance. Clause (1) is not applicable to Parker & Parsley
85-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd., Parker &
Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd., Parker &
Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.,
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.,
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd., Parker &
Parsley 87-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv.,
Ltd. and Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. and Parker &
Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. In addition,
no transferee of a partnership interest has the
right to become a substitute limited partner
unless, among other things, such substitution is
approved by Pioneer USA, which may grant or
withhold such consent in its absolute discretion.
In view of the foregoing restrictions, it was
never intended that the partnership interests
would be actively traded. No broad-based secondary
market for the partnership interests of any
partnership exists.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RIGHTS OF REPURCHASE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pioneer Parent's stockholders have no right to Within the time periods specified in the
present their shares of Pioneer Parent common partnership agreements of Parker & Parsley 82-I,
stock for repurchase by Pioneer Parent or any Ltd., Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd., Parker &
other person. Parsley 82-III, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.,
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. and Parker & Parsley
84-A, Ltd., a limited partner of any of those
partnerships may tender all or, subject to some
limitations, part of his partnership interests in
the partnership to Pioneer USA for repurchase in
accordance with the partnership agreement for the
partnership. See "Risk Factors -- Risk Factors
Relating to the Merger of Each
Partnership -- Repurchase Rights Terminate on
Completion of the Mergers." A comparison of the
merger value for each of these partnerships and
the repurchase prices in 2001 is set forth in
Table 8 of Appendix A.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
80
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MANAGEMENT, MANAGEMENT LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pioneer Parent is managed by a board of directors Each of the partnerships is managed by Pioneer
elected by its stockholders. Under Delaware law, USA, which generally has exclusive authority over
the directors are accountable to Pioneer Parent each of the partnership's operations. The limited
and its stockholders as fiduciaries and are partners may not participate in management of the
required to perform their duties (1) in good partnerships. Under Delaware and Texas law,
faith, (2) in a manner believed to be in the best Pioneer USA and any nonmanaging general partners
interests of Pioneer Parent and its stockholders of any of the partnerships are accountable to the
and (3) with such care, including reasonable partnership as fiduciaries and consequently are
inquiry, as an ordinarily prudent person in a like required to exercise good faith and integrity in
position would use under similar circumstances. all of their dealings with respect to the affairs
The liability of the directors is limited pursuant of the partnership. Under Texas or Delaware law,
to the provisions of Delaware law and Pioneer as applicable, Pioneer USA and any nonmanaging
Parent's certificate of incorporation, which general partners of any of the partnerships have
limits a director's liability for monetary damages liability for the payment of partnership
to Pioneer Parent or its stockholders for breach obligations and debts, unless limitations upon
of the director's duty of care, where a director such liability are expressly stated in the
fails to exercise sufficient care in carrying out obligation. The partnership agreement of each
the responsibilities of office. Such provisions, partnership provides generally that Pioneer USA,
however, would not protect a director for (1) a any nonmanaging general partners of the
breach of duty of loyalty, (2) intentional partnership and, in some cases, their affiliates
misconduct or knowing violations of law, (3) will be indemnified for losses relating to acts
unlawful dividend payments or redemption of stock, performed or omitted to be performed in good faith
or (4) any transaction in which the director and in the best interests of the partnership;
derived an improper personal benefit. Such provided that the conduct of Pioneer USA, any such
provisions do not foreclose any other remedy which nonmanaging general partner or affiliate, as
might be available to Pioneer Parent or its applicable, did not constitute negligence or
stockholders. Pioneer Parent's certificate of misconduct. Pioneer USA and any nonmanaging
incorporation and Delaware law provide broad general partners of the partnership may be removed
indemnification rights to directors and officers by an affirmative vote of limited partners holding
who a majority of the outstanding limited partnership
interests in the partnership; provided, that an
- act in good faith, opinion of counsel to the limited partners and
acceptable to the partnership is delivered to the
- in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not partnership to the effect that the exercise of
opposed to the best interests of Pioneer Parent such rights by the limited partners (1) will not
and, result in the loss of the limited partners'
limited liability and (2) will not adversely
- with respect to criminal actions or proceedings, affect the tax status of the partnership, Pioneer
without reasonable cause to believe their USA or the other partners.
conduct was unlawful.
Pioneer Parent's certificate of incorporation also
requires Pioneer Parent to indemnify its officers
and directors under some circumstances for
expenses or liabilities incurred as a result of
litigation. In addition, Pioneer Parent's
certificate of incorporation authorizes Pioneer
Parent to advance expenses incurred in the defense
of its directors and officers. Pioneer Parent
intends to take full advantage of those provisions
and has entered into agreements with Pioneer
Parent's directors and officers indemnifying them
to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The board of directors of Pioneer Parent appoints Each partnership reimburses Pioneer USA for its
officers to serve at the discretion of the board general and administrative expenses.
of directors. The board of directors of Pioneer
Parent determines the officer salaries and
incentive compensation; provided, that the board
of directors of Pioneer Parent may delegate the
power to determine such compensation to the
chairman of the board, the president or any
committee of the board of directors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MANAGEMENT CONTROL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pioneer Parent's board of directors has exclusive Under the partnership agreement of each
control over Pioneer Parent's business and affairs partnership, Pioneer USA is generally vested with
subject only to the restrictions in Pioneer all management authority to manage, control,
Parent's certificate of incorporation and bylaws. administer and operate the business, properties
Pioneer Parent's stockholders have the right to and affairs of the partnership, including
elect members of the board of directors by a authority and responsibility for overseeing all
plurality vote at each annual meeting of the executive, supervisory and administrative services
stockholders. The directors are accountable to rendered to the partnership. Pioneer USA and any
Pioneer Parent and its subsidiaries as nonmanaging general partners have the right to
fiduciaries. continue to serve in such capacity unless Pioneer
USA or such nonmanaging general partner is removed
upon the affirmative vote of limited partners
holding a majority of the outstanding limited
partnership interests in the partnership;
provided, that an opinion of counsel to the
limited partners, and acceptable to the
partnership, is delivered to the partnership to
the effect that the exercise of such rights by the
limited partners (1) will not result in the loss
of the limited partners' limited liability and (2)
will not adversely affect the tax status of the
partnership, Pioneer USA or the other partners.
The limited partners of each partnership have no
right to participate in the management and control
of the partnership and have no voice in the
partnership's affairs except for some limited
matters that may be submitted to a vote of the
limited partners under the terms of the
partnership agreement of the partnership. See
"Voting Rights and Amendments" below. Pioneer USA
is accountable as a fiduciary to each partnership.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOTING RIGHTS AND AMENDMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pioneer Parent's certificate of incorporation Generally, meetings of each partnership may be
provides that (1) stockholders of Pioneer Parent called by Pioneer USA or by limited partners
may act only at annual or special meetings of owning at least 10% of the outstanding limited
stockholders and not by written consent, (2) partnership interests. The limited partners may
Pioneer Parent will hold an annual meeting each conduct any partnership business at such meeting
calendar year at which its stockholders will elect which is permitted under the partnership agreement
directors, (3) special meetings of stockholders for such partnership and is specified in the
may be called only by the board of directors, and notice of such meeting, but the limited partners
(4) only business proposed by the board of may not engage in any activity which would be
directors may be considered at special meetings of deemed taking part in the management or control of
stockholders. the partnership's business.
Most amendments to Pioneer Parent's certificate of Amendments to the partnership agreement of each
incorporation require the approval of the partnership generally require the approval by
stockholders who own a majority of the outstanding limited partners holding a majority of outstanding
shares of Pioneer Parent common stock. A number of limited partnership interests in the partnership.
fundamental amendments, however, require approval An amendment that has any of the following effects
by a greater percentage of stockholders. For requires the unanimous approval of Pioneer USA and
example, any amendment to the following provisions the limited partners: (1) increases the liability
requires the approval of two-thirds of the or duties of any of the partners, (2) changes the
stockholders: (1) election of directors, (2) contributions required of the partners, (3)
authority of the board of directors, (3) provides for any reallocation of profits, losses
stockholder meetings and (4) limitation on the or deductions to the detriment of a partner, (4)
liability of directors. Any amendment to the establishes any new priority in one or more
provision that prohibits action by the written partners as to the return of capital contributions
consent of the stockholders in lieu of a meeting or as to profits, losses, deductions or
requires the approval of 80% of the stockholders. distribution to the detriment of a partner, or (5)
In addition, the following actions require the causes the partnership to be taxed as a
approval of 80% of the stockholders and the corporation. Pioneer USA may, in its sole
approval of two-thirds of the disinterested discretion, adopt any of the following amendments:
stockholders: (1) any merger, consolidation or (1) change the name of the partnership, (2) change
share exchange involving any person, other than the location of the principal place of business of
Pioneer Parent or a subsidiary of Pioneer Parent, the partnership, (3) admit a new or substitute
who beneficially owns 10% or more of the limited partner, (4) modify its general
outstanding voting securities of Pioneer Parent, partnership interest as a result of a transfer of
which person we call a related party, (2) some a portion of such interest, (5) correct a
sales, leases, exchanges or similar transactions typographical error, or (6) any other similar
with related parties, (3) some issuances of change where the Pioneer USA determines that the
securities to related parties, (4) adoption of any amendment will not adversely affect the limited
plan or proposal for liquidation of Pioneer Parent partners and Pioneer USA believes the amendment is
initiated by related parties, or (5) any series or necessary or advisable to qualify the partnership
combination of any of the actions described in under the laws of a state in which it engages or
clauses (1) through (4). proposes to engage in business or to keep the
partnership from being treated as a corporation
for tax purposes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The certificate of incorporation and bylaws of There are no anti-takeover provisions in the
Pioneer Parent and the Delaware General partnership agreement for any of the partnerships
Corporation Law include a number of provisions or under Delaware or Texas partnership law.
which may have the effect of encouraging persons
considering unsolicited tender offers or other
unilateral takeover proposals to negotiate with
Pioneer Parent's board of directors rather than
pursue non-negotiated takeover attempts. These
provisions include (1) a classified board of
directors, (2) advance notice requirements for
shareholder proposals and director nominations,
(3) restrictions on certain business combinations
and (4) prohibition against actions approved by
written consent without the approval of a
specified percentage of the shareholders. In
addition, Pioneer Parent has adopted a rights plan
and distributed to each holder of its common stock
and Canadian exchangeable shares rights to acquire
shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock in certain circumstances. The rights plan,
which is also known as a "poison pill," is
intended to prevent any person from accumulating a
significant position in Pioneer Parent's voting
stock without approval of Pioneer Parent's board
of directors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTINUITY OF EXISTENCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pioneer Parent has a perpetual existence. Except for the following partnerships, each
partnership has a finite life of 50 years from the
year of its formation. The following partnerships
continue until terminated by mutual agreement of
the partners of the partnership:
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
84
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED LIABILITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A stockholder's liability will generally be Assuming the limited partners of a partnership do
limited to such stockholder's contribution to not take part in the management or control of the
Pioneer Parent's capital. Under Delaware law, business of such partnership, a limited partner's
Pioneer Parent's stockholders will not be liable liability is generally limited to the limited
for Pioneer Parent's debts or obligations. The partner's contribution to the capital of the
shares of Pioneer Parent common stock offered by partnership and such limited partner's share of
Pioneer Parent under this document, upon issuance, assets and undistributed profits of the
will be fully paid and nonassessable. partnership. A limited partner will receive a
return of the limited partner's capital
contribution to the partnership to the extent that
a distribution to the limited partner reduces the
limited partner's share of the fair value of the
partnership's net assets below the value of the
limited partner's unreturned capital
contributions. A substituted limited partner is
subject to the liabilities and obligations of the
substituted limited partner's assignor, except
those liabilities of which the substituted limited
partner was unaware at the time he became a
substituted limited partner and which could not be
ascertained from the partnership agreement of the
partnership.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUSINESS ACTIVITIES AND FINANCING
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pioneer Parent's mission is to provide its The business operations of each partnership have
stockholders with superior investment returns consisted of the acquisition, development and
through strategies that maximize Pioneer Parent's production of oil and gas reserves. Each
long-term profitability and net asset values. The partnership has expended its initial partnership
strategies employed to achieve this mission are capital, and additional properties cannot be
anchored by Pioneer Parent's long-lived Spraberry acquired. Operations can be financed only through
oil and gas field and Hugoton and West Panhandle permitted borrowings, reinvestment of earnings not
gas fields' reserves and production. Underlying distributed, permitted assessments, or permitted
these fields are approximately 67% of Pioneer sales of assets. Each partnership generally is
Parent's proved oil and gas reserves which have a required to distribute to its partners all or
remaining productive life in excess of 40 years. substantially all its net cash flow from
The stable base of oil and gas production from operations, after provision for any reserves
these fields generates operating cash flows that deemed appropriate by Pioneer USA.
allow Pioneer Parent the financial flexibility to
selectively reinvest capital:
- to develop and increase production from existing
properties through low-risk development drilling
activities;
- to leverage cost containment opportunities to
achieve operating and technical efficiencies;
and
- to pursue strategic acquisitions in Pioneer
Parent's core areas that will complement Pioneer
Parent's existing asset base and provide
additional growth opportunities.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
85
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pioneer Parent also has the financial flexibility
to use portions of its operating cash flows:
- to selectively expand into new geographic areas
that feature producing properties and provide
exploration or exploitation opportunities;
- to invest in the personnel and technology
necessary to increase Pioneer Parent's
exploration opportunities; and
- to enhance liquidity.
This flexibility allows Pioneer Parent to take
advantage of future exploration, development and
acquisition opportunities. Pioneer Parent may
engage in any phase of the oil and gas business
and any other lawful business.
Pioneer Parent may finance its operations and the
acquisition of additional properties through,
among other things, the issuance of additional
shares of Pioneer Parent common stock, borrowings,
and the reinvestment of earnings not distributed
to stockholders.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL REPORTING
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pioneer Parent is subject to the reporting For a list of the partnerships that are subject to
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of the reporting requirements of the Securities
1934. Exchange Act of 1934, see "Where You Can Find More
Information" on the inside front cover page of
this document. In addition, the partnership
agreement of each partnership requires that some
reports be delivered to the limited partners.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Double taxation" at the corporate and stockholder None of the partnerships is a taxable entity for
levels typically results when a corporation such federal income tax purposes. The partners of each
as Pioneer Parent earns income and distributes partnership are required to take into account
that income to its stockholders in the form of their pro rata share of the partnership's income,
dividends. Stockholders will only recognize income gains, losses, and deductions, regardless of
on amounts actually distributed by Pioneer Parent. whether they receive any cash distributions from
Distributions made by Pioneer Parent out of the partnership. Some partners may be entitled to
current or accumulated earnings and profits are percentage depletion. A partner will be required
taxed as dividend income. Distributions in excess to recapture some deductions and credits upon the
of current or accumulated earnings and profits are sale of all or a portion of his partnership
treated as a non-taxable return of basis to the interests.
extent of stockholders' adjusted basis in their
shares, with the excess taxed as capital gain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
86
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARES PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dividends, if any, received by stockholders from A partner's share of a partnership's income and
Pioneer Parent generally will constitute portfolio loss will be subject to the "passive activity"
income, and cannot be offset with losses from limitations. Under the passive activity rules,
"passive activities." Losses and credits generated losses of a partner arising from his ownership of
within Pioneer Parent do not pass through to the partnership interests may be used to offset
stockholders. After the end of Pioneer Parent's passive income from another passive investment and
taxable year, stockholders will receive Form income of a partner arising from his ownership of
1099-DIV to report their dividend income. partnership interests may only be offset with
passive losses from another passive investment.
For a discussion of the tax consequences
associated with the merger of each partnership,
see "The Merger of Each Partnership -- Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND OR DISTRIBUTION POLICY AND PARTICIPATION IN PROFITS AND LOSSES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The shares of Pioneer Parent common stock For a description of the distribution policies of
constitute equity interests in Pioneer Parent. each partnership, see "Risk Factors -- Risks
Each stockholder will be entitled to his pro rata Associated with an Investment in Pioneer
share of the dividends made with respect to the Parent -- Pioneer Parent Might Not Declare
Pioneer Parent common stock. The dividends payable Dividends." The average quarterly cash
to the stockholders are not fixed in amount and distributions by each partnership for 1999, 2000
are only paid if, as and when declared by Pioneer and the year-to-date in 2001 are set forth in
Parent's board of directors. Dividends payable Table 7 of Appendix A. For a description of the
with respect to the shares of Pioneer Parent provisions of the partnership agreement of each
common stock depend upon the performance of partnership governing the allocation of costs and
Pioneer Parent. revenues among the partnership's partners, see
Table 9 of Appendix A.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEGAL MATTERS
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., of Dallas, Texas, counsel to Pioneer Parent, will
pass upon the validity of the Pioneer Parent common stock to be issued upon the
merger of each partnership and material federal income tax matters related to
the merger of each partnership. The special legal counsel to the limited
partners for the limited purpose of rendering certain opinions, Stradley Ronon
Stevens & Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, will deliver the legal opinion
referred to in "The Merger of Each Partnership -- Legal Opinion for Limited
Partners" beginning on page 53 of this document. That special counsel may rely
as to matters of law of the State of Texas on the opinion of Arter & Hadden LLP,
of Dallas, Texas.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
The consolidated financial statements of Pioneer Parent appearing in its
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000, have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their
report, which is incorporated by reference into this document. Such consolidated
financial statements are incorporated by reference in reliance upon such report
given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of each partnership listed on pages 4 and 5 of
this document at December 31, 2000 and 1999 and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2000 have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP,
independent auditors, as set forth in their reports included in the supplemental
information to this document for each partnership. Such financial statements are
included in the supplemental information of each partnership in reliance upon
such reports given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., independent petroleum consultants,
estimated each partnership's reserves as of December 31, 2000, and reviewed
Pioneer Parent's and Pioneer USA's estimates of each partnership's reserves as
of March 31, 2001 and the present value of the estimated future net revenues
from those estimated reserves included in the summary reserve reports included
in this document and such summary reserve reports and estimates and the review
as of March 31, 2001, are included in this document in reliance upon their
reports given upon their authority as experts on the matters covered by the
summary reserve report and review.
87
COMMONLY USED OIL AND GAS TERMS
The definitions set forth below shall apply to the indicated terms as used
in this document. All volumes of natural gas referred to herein are stated at
the legal pressure base of the state or area where the reserves exist and at 60
degrees Fahrenheit and in most instances are rounded to the nearest major
multiple.
"Bbl" means a standard barrel of 42 U.S. gallons and represents the basic
unit for measuring the production of crude oil, natural gas liquids and
condensate.
"Bcf" means one billion cubic feet under prescribed conditions of pressure
and temperature and represents the basic unit for measuring the production of
natural gas.
"BOE" means a barrel-of-oil-equivalent and is a customary convention used
in the United States to express oil and gas volumes on a comparable basis. It is
determined on the basis of the estimated relative energy content of natural gas
to oil, being approximately six Mcf of natural gas per Bbl of oil.
"BTU" means British thermal unit.
"development drilling" means drilling within the proved area of an oil or
gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
"exploration activity" means drilling activity to find and produce oil or
natural gas in an area that is not known to be an oil or natural gas reservoir,
or drilling activity to extend a known reservoir.
"Mbbl" means one thousand Bbls.
"MBOE" means one thousand BOEs.
"Mcf" means one thousand cubic feet under prescribed conditions of pressure
and temperature and represents the basic unit for measuring the production of
natural gas.
"MMBbl" means one million Bbls.
"MMcf" means one million cubic feet under prescribed conditions of pressure
and temperature and represents the basic unit for measuring the production of
natural gas.
"NGLs" means natural gas liquids.
"proved reserves" means the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas,
and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with
reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs
under existing economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of
the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in
existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on
escalations based upon future conditions.
(i) Reservoirs are considered proved if economic producibility is
supported by either actual production or conclusive formation test. The
area of a reservoir considered proved includes (A) that portion delineated
by drilling and defined by gas-oil and/or oil-water contacts, if any; and
(B) the immediately adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which can be
reasonably judged as economically productive on the basis of available
geological and engineering data. In the absence of information on fluid
contacts, the lowest known structural occurrence of hydrocarbons controls
the power proved limit of the reservoir.
(ii) Reserves which can be produced economically through application
of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injection) are included in
the "proved" classification when successful testing by a pilot project, or
the operation of an installed program in the reservoir, provides support
for the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based.
(iii) Estimates of proved reserves do not include the following: (A)
oil that may become available from known reservoirs but is classified
separately as "indicated additional reserves"; (B) crude oil, natural gas,
and natural gas liquids, the recovery of which is subject to reasonable
doubt because of uncertainty as to geology, reservoir characteristics, or
economic factors; (C) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that
may occur in undrilled prospects; and (D) crude oil, natural gas, and
natural gas liquids, that may be recovered from oil shales, coal, gilsonite
and other such sources.
88
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements of Pioneer Parent
have been prepared to give effect to Pioneer Parent's offer to acquire 46
limited partnerships (collectively, the "Combined Partnerships") that Pioneer
USA serves as the sole or managing general partner. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer
USA agreed to a merger value for each partnership. The aggregate merger value
for the Combined Partnerships is $107.1 million. For a description of the method
used to determine the merger value for each partnership and the amount of
Pioneer Parent common stock offered, see "Method of Determining Merger Value For
Each Partnership and Amount of Pioneer Parent Common Stock Offered." The merger
value for each partnership will not change. The only variables are the
determination of which partnerships will approve the agreement and plan of
merger, if any, and the number of shares of Pioneer Parent that will be issued
to the limited partners of those partnerships that approve the agreement and
plan of merger.
For purposes of presenting the unaudited pro forma combined financial
statements, Pioneer Parent has assumed that each partnership will approve the
agreement and plan of merger and will merge into Pioneer Parent and be converted
into the right to receive Pioneer Parent common stock using an estimated per
share market value of $18.00. The actual purchase price will be determined on
the closing date based on the value of Pioneer Parent's common stock issued to
those partnerships that approve the agreement and plan of merger. Pioneer Parent
will value the shares of common stock to be issued using the average closing
price of its common stock over a five day period comprised of the two days prior
to a defined measurement date, the defined measurement date and the two days
following the defined measurement date. See Note (2) to the unaudited pro forma
combined financial statements for additional information regarding the purchase
price, the valuation of Pioneer Parent common stock and the definition of the
measurement date referred to above.
The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet of Pioneer Parent as of June
30, 2001 has been prepared to give effect to the acquisition of the Combined
Partnerships as if it had occurred on June 30, 2001.
The unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations of Pioneer Parent
for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and for the year ended December 31, 2000
have been prepared to give effect to the acquisition of the Combined
Partnerships as if it had occurred on January 1, 2000.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements included herein are
not necessarily indicative of the results that might have occurred had the
transaction taken place on the dates that are assumed for the pro forma
presentations and are not intended to be a projection of future results. Future
results may vary significantly from the results reflected in the accompanying
unaudited pro forma combined financial statements because of normal production
declines, changes in product prices, future acquisitions and divestitures,
future development and exploration activities, and other factors.
The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements (and the related
notes) of Pioneer Parent included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and the historical financial statements of each partnership
in which you own an interest contained in the supplement to this document for
the partnership.
P-1
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2001
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
PIONEER COMBINED PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
PARENT PARTNERSHIPS ADJUSTMENTS PIONEER PARENT
----------- ------------ ----------- --------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 18,227 $ 12,819 $ (7,064)(c) $ 23,982
Accounts receivable:
Trade, net.............................................. 100,222 5,802 106,024
Affiliates.............................................. 2,460 -- (1,130)(b) 1,330
Inventories............................................... 15,068 -- 15,068
Deferred income taxes..................................... 5,600 -- 5,600
Other current assets:
Derivatives............................................. 51,304 -- -- 51,304
Other................................................... 8,338 -- -- 8,338
----------- --------- --------- -----------
Total current assets................................ 201,219 18,621 211,646
----------- --------- -----------
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Oil and gas properties, using the successful efforts
method of accounting:
Proved properties....................................... 3,400,375 355,133 (258,448)(a) 3,497,060
Unproved properties..................................... 210,808 -- 210,808
Accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization...... (1,003,926) (309,584) 309,584(a) (1,003,926)
----------- --------- -----------
2,607,257 45,549 2,703,942
----------- --------- -----------
Deferred income taxes....................................... 83,611 -- 83,611
Other property and equipment, net........................... 21,425 -- 21,425
Other assets, net........................................... 148,542 -- 148,542
----------- --------- -----------
$ 3,062,054 $ 64,170 $ 3,169,166
=========== ========= ===========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable:
Trade................................................... $ 113,046 $ 49 $ $ 113,095
Affiliates.............................................. 3,200 1,130 (1,130)(b) 3,200
Interest payable.......................................... 39,056 -- 39,056
Other current liabilities:
Derivative obligations.................................. 43,020 -- 43,020
Other................................................... 48,362 -- 48,362
----------- --------- -----------
Total current liabilities........................... 246,684 1,179 246,733
----------- --------- -----------
Long-term debt.............................................. 1,572,227 -- 1,572,227
Other noncurrent liabilities................................ 179,656 -- 179,656
Deferred income taxes....................................... 24,485 -- 24,485
Partners' capital........................................... -- 62,991 (62,991)(a)(c) --
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock.............................................. 1,017 -- 59(a) 1,076
Additional paid-in capital................................ 2,357,778 -- 107,004(a) 2,464,782
Treasury stock............................................ (44,431) -- (44,431)
Accumulated deficit....................................... (1,326,497) -- (1,326,497)
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Deferred hedge gains and losses......................... 49,375 -- 49,375
Cumulative translation adjustment....................... 1,760 -- 1,760
----------- --------- -----------
Total stockholders' equity and partners' capital.... 1,039,002 62,991 1,146,065
----------- --------- -----------
Commitments and contingencies............................... $ 3,062,054 $ 64,170 $ 3,169,166
=========== ========= ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited pro forma
combined financial statements.
P-2
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
PIONEER COMBINED PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
PARENT PARTNERSHIPS ADJUSTMENTS PIONEER PARENT
-------- ------------ ----------- --------------
Revenues:
Oil and gas............................................ $476,597 $25,254 $(1,666)(d) $500,185
Interest and other..................................... 16,122 195 (12)(d) 16,305
Gain on disposition of assets, net..................... 8,765 178 -- 8,943
-------- ------- --------
501,484 25,627 525,433
-------- ------- --------
Cost and expenses:
Oil and gas production................................. 107,776 10,618 (80)(d)
(3,311)(e) 115,003
Depletion, depreciation and amortization............... 109,557 1,739 1,613 (f) 112,909
Exploration and abandonments........................... 69,466 119 -- 69,585
General and administrative............................. 18,453 777 (58)(d)
3,311 (e) 22,483
Interest............................................... 69,876 -- 69,876
Other.................................................. 27,091 -- 27,091
-------- ------- --------
402,219 13,253 416,947
-------- ------- --------
Income from continuing operations before income taxes.... 99,265 12,374 108,486
Income tax provision..................................... (3,008) -- -- (h) (3,008)
-------- ------- --------
Income from continuing operations........................ $ 96,257 $12,374 $105,478
======== ======= ========
Income from continuing operations per common share:
Basic............................................. $ .98 $ 1.01
======== ========
Diluted........................................... $ .97 $ 1.00
======== ========
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic............................................. 98,358 5,948 (i) 104,306
======== ========
Diluted........................................... 99,709 5,948 (i) 105,657
======== ========
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma combined financial statements.
P-3
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
PIONEER COMBINED PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
PARENT PARTNERSHIPS ADJUSTMENTS PIONEER PARENT
-------- ------------ ----------- --------------
Revenues:
Oil and gas............................................ $852,738 $52,013 $(3,369)(d) $901,382
Interest and other..................................... 25,775 484 (28)(d) 26,231
Gain on disposition of assets, net..................... 34,184 247 (6)(d) 34,425
-------- ------- --------
912,697 52,744 962,038
-------- ------- --------
Cost and expenses:
Oil and gas production................................. 189,265 19,958 (1,392)(d)
(5,655)(e) 202,176
Depletion, depreciation and amortization............... 214,938 3,236 3,768 (f) 221,942
Impairment of oil and gas properties................... -- 663 (663)(g) --
Exploration and abandonments........................... 87,550 72 (3)(d) 87,619
General and administrative............................. 33,262 1,599 (110)(d)
5,655 (e) 40,406
Interest............................................... 161,952 -- 161,952
Other.................................................. 67,231 -- 67,231
-------- ------- --------
754,198 25,528 781,326
-------- ------- --------
Income from continuing operations before income taxes.... 158,499 27,216 180,712
Income tax benefit....................................... 6,000 -- -- (h) 6,000
-------- ------- --------
Income from continuing operations........................ $164,499 $27,216 $186,712
======== ======= ========
Income from continuing operations per common share:
Basic............................................. $ 1.65 $ 1.77
======== ========
Diluted........................................... $ 1.65 $ 1.77
======== ========
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic............................................. 99,378 5,948 (i) 105,326
======== ========
Diluted........................................... 99,762 5,948 (i) 105,710
======== ========
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma combined financial statements.
P-4
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2001 AND DECEMBER 31, 2000
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information of Pioneer Natural
Resources Company ("Pioneer Parent") has been prepared to give effect to Pioneer
Parent's offer to acquire 46 limited partnerships (collectively, the "Combined
Partnerships") that Pioneer USA serves as the sole or managing general partner.
The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2001 has been
prepared to give effect to the acquisition of the Combined Partnerships as if it
had occurred on June 30, 2001. The unaudited pro forma combined statements of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and for the year ended
December 31, 2000 are presented as if the acquisition of the Combined
Partnerships occurred on January 1, 2000.
Following is a description of the individual columns included in these
unaudited pro forma combined financial statements:
Pioneer Parent -- Represents the consolidated balance sheet of Pioneer
Parent as of June 30, 2001, and the consolidated statements of operations
of Pioneer Parent for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and the year ended
December 31, 2000.
Combined Partnerships -- Represents the combined balance sheets of the
46 limited partnerships as of June 30, 2001 and the combined statements of
operations of such limited partnerships for the six months ended June 30,
2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000.
NOTE 2. PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS
Following are descriptions of the pro forma adjustments used in the
preparation of the accompanying unaudited pro forma combined financial
statements:
(a) To record the acquisition of the Combined Partnerships, using the purchase
method of accounting, for $107.1 million in Pioneer Parent common stock,
representing 5,947,940 shares assuming an $18.00 average stock price. The
allocation of the purchase price to the acquired assets and liabilities is
preliminary and, therefore, subject to change.
The purchase price allocation as of June 30, 2001 reflects the fair value
of the Combined Partnerships' assets and liabilities as of that date. A
final purchase price allocation will be done at closing based upon the fair
value of the Combined Partnerships' assets and liabilities at that time.
The date three business days prior to the special meeting of limited
partners of each partnership to be held on December 20, 2001 will be the
measurement date for determining the final number of shares of Pioneer
Parent common stock to be issued (the "Measurement Date"). Pioneer Parent
will value the shares to be issued using the average closing price of
Pioneer Parent common stock for the five-day period comprised of the two
days prior to the Measurement Date, the Measurement Date and the two
business days subsequent to the Measurement Date. The final allocation is
not anticipated to change materially other than for cash flow generated
from the Combined Partnerships' property interests between March 31, 2001
and closing, which will be reflected as a reduction to oil and gas
properties and an increase to working capital in the final purchase price
allocation.
(b) To eliminate affiliate receivables and affiliate payables between Pioneer
Parent and the Combined Partnerships.
(c) To adjust pro forma cash and partners' capital for the $7.1 million cash
distribution disbursed to existing partners other than Pioneer USA during
July 2001.
(d) To eliminate Pioneer Parent's proportionate share of the Combined
Partnerships that is already reflected in Pioneer Parent's consolidated
statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and for the
year ended December 31, 2000.
(e) To eliminate the Combined Partnership's share of operating overhead charged
by Pioneer Parent that was recorded by the Combined Partnerships as an
increase in lease operating expenses and by Pioneer Parent as a reduction
to general and administrative expense.
(f) To adjust depreciation, depletion and amortization expense for the basis
allocated to the oil and gas properties acquired and accounted for using
the successful efforts method of accounting.
P-5
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(g) To eliminate the Combined Partnerships impairment of oil and gas properties
that would not occur on a pro forma basis with Pioneer Parent due to the
basis in oil and gas properties reflecting the value assigned using the
purchase method of accounting.
(h) Pioneer Parent has unused net operating loss carryovers in the United
States that could be used to offset any incremental earnings of the
Combined Partnerships. Accordingly, no pro forma adjustment was recorded
for additional income tax expense. See Note 3. below.
(i) To adjust the weighted average basic and diluted common shares outstanding
for the issuance of 5,947,940 shares of Pioneer Parent common stock to
acquire the Combined Partnerships.
The pro forma numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share
calculations equals "income from continuing operations" per the Unaudited Pro
Forma Combined Statement of Operations (see pages P-3 and P-4). Following is a
reconciliation of the pro forma weighted average basic and diluted shares
outstanding (in thousands):
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
2001 2000
--------- ------------
Pioneer Parent weighted average basic common shares
outstanding............................................... 98,358 99,378
Shares issued to the nonmanaging general partners*.......... 11 11
Shares issued to the limited partners*...................... 5,937 5,937
------- -------
Pro forma Pioneer Parent weighted average basic shares
outstanding............................................... 104,306 105,326
Effect of dilutive common stock options..................... 1,351 384
------- -------
Pro forma Pioneer Parent weighted average diluted shares
outstanding............................................... 105,657 105,710
======= =======
---------------
* The actual shares issued to the nonmanaging general partners and limited
partners will be based on the final determination of the aggregate purchase
price and the final measurement of the value of Pioneer Parent common stock,
as described more fully in adjustment (a) above. The following table
quantifies a range of possible shares to be issued to the nonmanaging general
partners and limited partners and Pioneer Parent's pro forma income from
continuing operations per common share -- basic and diluted for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000 if, based on a $107.1
million aggregate purchase price, the average closing price of the Pioneer
Parent common stock over the five day period comprised of the two business
days prior to the Measurement Date, the Measurement Date and the two business
days subsequent to the Measurement Date is $16.00 per share, $18.00 per share,
or $20.00 per share:
AVERAGE PRICE OF PIONEER
PARENT COMMON STOCK
-----------------------------------------
$16.00 $18.00 $20.00
----------- ----------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Shares issued to the nonmanaging general partners........... 13 11 10
======== ======== ========
Shares issued to the limited partners....................... 6,679 5,937 5,343
======== ======== ========
For the six months ended June 30, 2001:
Pro forma Pioneer Parent weighted average basic shares
outstanding............................................ 105,050 104,306 103,711
======== ======== ========
Pro forma Pioneer Parent weighted average diluted shares
outstanding............................................ 106,401 105,657 105,062
======== ======== ========
Pro forma income from continuing operations per common
share:
Basic................................................ $ 1.00 $ 1.01 $ 1.02
======== ======== ========
Diluted.............................................. $ 0.99 $ 1.00 $ 1.00
======== ======== ========
For the year ended December 31, 2000:
Pro forma Pioneer Parent weighted average basic shares
outstanding............................................ 106,070 105,326 104,731
======== ======== ========
Pro forma Pioneer Parent weighted average diluted shares
outstanding............................................ 106,454 105,710 105,115
======== ======== ========
Pro forma income from continuing operations per common
share:
Basic................................................ $ 1.76 $ 1.77 $ 1.78
======== ======== ========
Diluted.............................................. $ 1.75 $ 1.77 $ 1.78
======== ======== ========
P-6
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
NOTE 3. INCOME TAXES
Pioneer Parent will account for income taxes in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting
for Income Taxes." In accordance therewith, Pioneer Parent will prepare separate
tax calculations for each tax jurisdiction in which Pioneer Parent will be
subject to income taxes. Pioneer Parent has unused net operating loss carryovers
and alternative minimum tax net operating loss carryovers that would be utilized
to reduce incremental United States income taxes that would otherwise be
incurred as a result of pro forma pre-tax earnings of the Combined Partnerships.
Accordingly, Pioneer Parent has not recognized incremental income tax expense in
the accompanying unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations for the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000.
NOTE 4. OIL AND GAS RESERVE DATA
The following unaudited pro forma supplemental information regarding the
oil and gas activities of Pioneer Parent is presented pursuant to the disclosure
requirements promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69, "Disclosures About Oil and Gas
Producing Activities." The pro forma combined reserve information is presented
as if the acquisition of the Combined Partnerships had occurred on January 1,
2000. Information for oil and NGL's are presented in barrels (Bbls) and for gas
in thousands of cubic feet (Mcf).
The pro forma combined net proved reserves are 2.2 MMBOE more than the
summation of historical net proved reserves of Pioneer Parent and the Combined
Partnerships. This difference can be attributed to the net impact of the
partnerships' historical net proved reserves being burdened by administrative
overhead and the Pioneer Parent reserves already including its pro rata share of
the partnerships' reserves. Administrative overhead is charged by the operator
(Pioneer Parent for the majority of the properties) in accordance with the joint
operating agreements of each property and in accordance with the guidelines
prescribed by the Council of Petroleum Accounting Society ("COPAS"). Because
these charges will not be charged to Pioneer Parent after the transaction, on a
pro forma combined basis Pioneer Parent has eliminated the administrative
overhead charges consistent with industry standards. Consequently, the economic
lives of the partnerships' properties are extended and additional reserves on a
pro forma combined basis have been added. Offsetting the adjustment above is the
elimination of Pioneer Parent's general partner and limited partner ownership
because such ownership is already included in Pioneer Parent's reserves.
Pioneer Parent emphasizes that reserve estimates are inherently imprecise
and subject to revision and that estimates of new discoveries are more imprecise
than those of producing oil and gas properties. Accordingly, the estimates are
expected to change as future information becomes available and such changes
could be significant.
For additional information regarding the oil and gas activities of Pioneer
Parent and the Combined Partnerships, from which the following unaudited pro
forma supplemental information was derived, please see: (a) Pioneer Parent's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 for information
regarding Pioneer Parent's stand-alone oil and gas activities, (b) Table 11 of
Appendix A and (c) the review by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. of the
Summary Reserve Report for the Combined Partnerships included in Appendix C for
the volumes and values attributable to the Combined Partnerships.
P-7
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
QUANTITIES OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES
Set forth below is a pro forma summary of the changes in the net quantities
of oil, NGL and natural gas reserves for the year ended December 31, 2000.
OIL &
NGLS GAS
(MBBLS) (MMCF) MBOE
------- --------- -------
TOTAL PROVED RESERVES:
UNITED STATES
Balance, January 1........................................ 290,723 1,365,775 518,352
Revisions of previous estimates........................... 18,704 54,518 27,790
Purchases of minerals-in-place............................ 1,237 28,071 5,916
New discoveries and extensions............................ 4,819 66,486 15,900
Production................................................ (18,571) (86,206) (32,939)
Sales of minerals-in-place................................ (743) (35,054) (6,586)
------- --------- -------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31........................................ 296,169 1,393,590 528,433
ARGENTINA
Balance, January 1........................................ 29,797 415,620 99,067
Revisions of previous estimates........................... 1,411 (15,558) (1,182)
Purchases of minerals-in-place............................ -- -- --
New discoveries and extensions............................ 8,066 43,914 15,385
Production................................................ (3,431) (35,694) (9,380)
Sales of minerals-in-place................................ -- -- --
------- --------- -------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31........................................ 35,843 408,282 103,890
CANADA
Balance, January 1........................................ 3,970 145,251 28,179
Revisions of previous estimates........................... 429 (10,013) (1,240)
Purchases of minerals-in-place............................ 140 7,768 1,435
New discoveries and extensions............................ 138 6,132 1,160
Production................................................ (611) (16,219) (3,315)
Sales of minerals-in-place................................ -- -- --
------- --------- -------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31........................................ 4,066 132,919 26,219
SOUTH AFRICA
BALANCE, JANUARY 1.......................................... -- -- --
New discoveries and extensions.............................. 5,552 -- 5,552
------- --------- -------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31........................................ 5,552 -- 5,552
TOTAL
BALANCE, JANUARY 1.......................................... 324,490 1,926,646 645,598
Revisions of previous estimates............................. 20,544 28,947 25,368
Purchases of minerals-in-place.............................. 1,377 35,839 7,351
New discoveries and extensions.............................. 18,575 116,532 37,997
Production.................................................. (22,613) (138,119) (45,634)
Sales of minerals-in-place.................................. (743) (35,054) (6,586)
------- --------- -------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31........................................ 341,630 1,934,791 664,094
======= ========= =======
PROVED DEVELOPED RESERVES:
United States............................................. 241,253 1,169,664 436,198
Argentina................................................. 22,931 358,124 82,618
Canada.................................................... 2,598 61,210 12,800
------- --------- -------
JANUARY 1......................................... 266,782 1,588,998 531,616
======= ========= =======
United States............................................. 236,249 1,120,610 423,018
Argentina................................................. 22,679 345,281 80,226
Canada.................................................... 2,930 80,953 16,422
------- --------- -------
DECEMBER 31....................................... 261,858 1,546,844 519,666
======= ========= =======
P-8
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS
The pro forma standardized measure of discounted future net cash flow is
computed by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price
changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the
estimated future production of oil and gas reserves less estimated future
expenditures (based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and
producing the proved reserves discounted using a rate of 10 percent per year to
reflect the estimated timing of the future cash flows. Future income taxes are
calculated by comparing undiscounted future cash flows to the tax basis of oil
and gas properties plus available carryforwards and credits and applying the
current tax rate to the difference.
DECEMBER 31,
2000
--------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
UNITED STATES
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows....................................... $19,616,735
Future production costs................................... (5,291,164)
Future development costs.................................. (479,742)
Future income tax expenses................................ (3,945,755)
-----------
9,900,074
10% annual discount factor........................ (4,991,410)
-----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows.............................................. $ 4,908,664
===========
ARGENTINA
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows....................................... $ 1,183,652
Future production costs................................... (215,853)
Future development costs.................................. (114,606)
Future income tax expenses................................ (81,705)
-----------
771,488
10% annual discount factor........................ (264,126)
-----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows.............................................. $ 507,362
===========
CANADA
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows....................................... $ 1,029,007
Future production costs................................... (104,189)
Future development costs.................................. (35,443)
Future income tax expenses................................ (306,399)
-----------
582,976
10% annual discount factor........................ (168,441)
-----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows.............................................. $ 414,535
===========
SOUTH AFRICA
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows....................................... $ 126,134
Future production costs................................... (65,232)
Future development costs.................................. (47,970)
Future income tax expenses................................ --
-----------
12,932
10% annual discount factor........................ (5,782)
-----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows.............................................. $ 7,150
===========
P-9
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31,
2000
--------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
TOTAL
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows....................................... $21,956,101
Future production costs................................... (5,677,011)
Future development costs.................................. (677,761)
Future income tax expenses................................ (4,333,859)
-----------
11,267,470
10% annual discount factor........................ (5,429,759)
-----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows.............................................. $ 5,837,711
===========
CHANGES RELATING TO THE PRO FORMA STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET
CASH FLOWS
The principal sources of the change in the pro forma combined standardized
measure of discounted future net cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2000
are as follows (in thousands):
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs.................. $ (699,206)
Net changes in prices and production costs.................. 3,920,249
Extension and discoveries................................... 525,361
Development costs incurred during the period................ 101,350
Sales of minerals-in-place.................................. (72,624)
Purchases of mineral-in-place............................... 187,097
Revisions of estimated future development costs............. (200,734)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates.................... 329,124
Accretion of discount....................................... 313,291
Changes in production rates, timing and other............... (270,400)
-----------
Change in present value of future net revenues.............. 4,133,508
Net change in present value of future income taxes.......... (1,428,710)
-----------
2,704,798
Balance, beginning of year........................ 3,132,913
-----------
Balance, end of year.............................. $ 5,837,711
===========
P-10
APPENDIX A
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
GENERAL INFORMATION RELATING TO EACH PARTNERSHIP
Table 1 Jurisdiction of Organization, Initial Subscription Price for Each Unit,
Initial Investment by Limited Partners and Number of Limited Partners
as of July 31, 2001
Table 2 Merger Value Attributable to Pioneer USA, Nonmanaging General Partners
and Limited Partners
Table 3 Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners
Per $1,000 Investment
Table 4 Ownership Percentage and Merger Value Attributable to Nonmanaging
General Partners Other Than Pioneer USA
Table 5 Ownership Percentage and Merger Value Attributable to Pioneer USA in
Its Capacities as General Partner, Nonmanaging General Partner and
Limited Partner
Table 6 Voting Percentage and Initial Investment Owned by Pioneer USA in Its
Capacity as a Limited Partner as of July 31, 2001
Table 7 Historical Quarterly Partnership Distributions to the Limited Partners
Per $1,000 Investment from Inception through July 31, 2001
Table 8 Annual Repurchase Prices and Aggregate Annual Repurchase Payments
Table 9 Participation in Costs and Revenues of Each Partnership
Table 10 Average Oil, Natural Gas Liquids and Gas Sales Prices and Production
Costs for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the Years
Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Table 11 Proved Reserves Attributable to Pioneer USA, Nonmanaging General
Partners and Limited Partners as of December 31, 2000
Table 12 Partnership Estimated Reserves Attributable to Pioneer USA, Nonmanaging
General Partners and Limited Partners as of March 31, 2001
Table 13 Oil, Natural Gas Liquids and Gas Production for the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and
1998
Table 14 Productive Wells and Developed Acreage as of June 30, 2001
Table 15 Recent Trades of Partnership Interests Per $1,000 Investments for the
Seven Months Ended July 31, 2001 and the Years Ended December 31, 2000
and 1999
Table 16 Reserve Value Attributable to Pioneer USA, Nonmanaging General Partners
and Limited Partners as of March 31, 2001
A-1
TABLE 1
JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION, INITIAL SUBSCRIPTION PRICE FOR EACH UNIT,
INITIAL INVESTMENT BY LIMITED PARTNERS AND NUMBER OF LIMITED PARTNERS
AS OF JULY 31, 2001
INITIAL
INITIAL INVESTMENT
SUBSCRIPTION BY LIMITED NUMBER OF
JURISDICTION OF PRICE FOR PARTNERS LIMITED
ORGANIZATION EACH UNIT (IN THOUSANDS) PARTNERS
--------------- ------------ -------------- ---------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.................................. Texas $ 5,000 $ 7,410 136
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd................................. Texas 5,000 6,440 159
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.................................. Texas 2,000 11,805 606
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd................................. Texas 2,000 12,252 769
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd................................ Texas 2,000 6,882 419
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.................................. Texas 1,000 19,505 1,262
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.................................. Texas 1,000 23,370 1,358
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.................................. Texas 1,000 19,435 1,227
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.................................. Texas 1,000 9,613 800
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.................................. Texas 1,000 7,988 718
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd............... Texas 40,000 5,000 107
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd........ Texas 40,000 4,690 81
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.................................. Texas 1,000 10,131 956
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.................................. Texas 1,000 17,208 1,382
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.................................. Texas 1,000 19,317 1,326
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd................. Texas 40,000 4,920 103
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd............................ Texas 1,000 3,856 213
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd.................................. Texas 1,000 28,811 2,114
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd............................ Texas 1,000 4,919 259
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.................................. Texas 1,000 20,089 1,464
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd............. Texas 500 12,213 1,093
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd............. Texas 500 6,096 550
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd................. Texas 40,000 10,480 197
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P............................ Delaware 1,000 3,793 236
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.................................. Delaware 1,000 12,935 985
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P............................ Delaware 1,000 3,636 240
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.................................. Delaware 1,000 8,954 691
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P............................ Delaware 1,000 3,411 217
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.................................. Delaware 1,000 2,431 191
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P............. Delaware 500 5,611 504
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P................. Delaware 40,000 9,960 153
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P............................ Delaware 1,000 2,797 191
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.................................. Delaware 1,000 8,317 606
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P............................ Delaware 1,000 6,307 341
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.................................. Delaware 1,000 6,949 460
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P................. Delaware 40,000 7,060 126
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P............................ Delaware 1,000 2,359 139
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.................................. Delaware 1,000 6,811 524
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P............................ Delaware 1,000 11,897 664
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.................................. Delaware 1,000 32,264 2,186
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P............................ Delaware 1,000 7,531 506
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.................................. Delaware 1,000 12,107 875
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P................. Delaware 40,000 10,970 197
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev., L.P............. Delaware 40,000 5,200 102
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.................................. Delaware 1,000 11,620 726
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.................................. Delaware 1,000 11,249 679
------
Total.............................................. 28,838
======
A-2
TABLE 2
MERGER VALUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO PIONEER USA, NONMANAGING
GENERAL PARTNERS AND LIMITED PARTNERS(a)
NONMANAGING
GENERAL LIMITED
PIONEER USA(B) PARTNERS(C) PARTNERS(D) TOTAL
-------------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................................ $ 235,285 $16,888 653,690 $ 905,863
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ............................... 160,791 6,535 526,536 693,862
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................................ 410,553 13,871 868,381 1,292,805
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ............................... 433,854 13,187 1,210,097 1,657,138
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .............................. 305,910 9,927 787,628 1,103,465
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ................................ 962,385 37,202 2,660,522 3,660,109
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ................................ 1,310,513 49,882 3,564,642 4,925,037
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ................................ 1,313,732 55,855 3,741,823 5,111,410
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ................................ 39,179 -- 1,299,886 1,339,065
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ................................ 20,208 -- 1,155,472 1,175,680
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. ............. 47,872 -- 1,370,151 1,418,023
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. ...... 28,332 -- 1,025,397 1,053,729
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ................................ 23,353 -- 1,716,778 1,740,131
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ................................ 69,533 -- 3,934,914 4,004,447
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ................................ 42,190 -- 3,184,609 3,226,799
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. ............... 13,416 -- 1,328,134 1,341,550
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. .......................... 14,805 -- 764,998 779,803
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ................................ 92,985 -- 5,713,729 5,806,714
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. .......................... 12,399 -- 1,019,742 1,032,141
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ................................ 51,532 -- 4,166,286 4,217,818
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. ........... 35,395 -- 2,589,227 2,624,622
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. ........... 61,106 -- 2,296,689 2,357,795
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. ............... 26,261 -- 2,599,862 2,626,123
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. .......................... 21,776 -- 922,941 944,717
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ................................ 75,042 -- 3,153,865 3,228,907
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. .......................... 19,347 -- 1,233,237 1,252,584
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ................................ 62,940 -- 3,023,397 3,086,337
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. .......................... 13,021 -- 996,208 1,009,229
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ................................ 8,602 -- 706,056 714,658
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P. ........... 35,259 -- 2,053,405 2,088,664
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. ............... 35,389 -- 3,503,510 3,538,899
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. .......................... 9,382 -- 928,839 938,221
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ................................ 62,877 -- 2,731,848 2,794,725
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. .......................... 23,451 -- 1,761,305 1,784,756
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ................................ 39,784 -- 1,924,144 1,963,928
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P. ............... 31,687 -- 1,998,362 2,030,049
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. .......................... 9,413 -- 583,543 592,956
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ................................ 53,832 -- 1,662,363 1,716,195
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. .......................... 54,557 -- 3,220,716 3,275,273
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ................................ 111,674 -- 8,788,939 8,900,613
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. .......................... 26,279 -- 1,858,388 1,884,667
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ................................ 36.882 -- 2,984,323 3,021,205
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P. ............... 52,606 -- 3,360,078 3,412,684
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev., L.P. ........... 16,330 -- 1,616,696 1,633,026
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ................................ 65,445 -- 4,665,291 4,730,736
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ................................ 55,026 -- 5,002,516 5,057,542
---------------
(a) The merger value for each partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(b) Represents Pioneer USA's partnership interests in each partnership as: (1)
the sole or managing general partner of the partnership; (2) a limited
partner of the partnership; and (3) the sole general partner of each
nonmanaging general partner. Pioneer USA will not receive any Pioneer
Parent common stock for its partnership interests in any participating
partnership. However, as a result of the merger of each participating
partnership, Pioneer USA will own 100% of the properties of the partnership
including properties attributable to its partnership interests in the
partnership.
(c) Represents four unaffiliated individuals' partnership interests as limited
partners of each nonmanaging general partner. Excludes Pioneer USA's
partnership interests as general partner of each nonmanaging general
partner.
(d) Represents the partnership interests of unaffiliated limited partners of
each partnership. Excludes Pioneer USA's partnership interests as a limited
partner of any partnership.
A-3
TABLE 3
MERGER VALUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
OF LIMITED PARTNERS PER $1,000 INVESTMENT
LIMITED PARTNERS PER $1,000 INVESTMENT
------------------------------------------------------
WORKING LESS
RESERVE CAPITAL EXPENSES JULY 2001 MERGER
VALUE VALUE AND FEES DISTRIBUTIONS VALUE
------- ------- -------- ------------- -------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................................ $ 93.46 $ 9.32 $(1.67) $ (7.43) $ 93.68
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ............................... 79.80 10.16 (1.43) (6.33) 82.20
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................................ 82.50 9.69 (1.48) (7.39) 83.32
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ............................... 100.28 9.83 (1.80) (5.04) 103.27
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .............................. 121.32 10.28 (2.17) (7.72) 121.71
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ................................ 138.02 15.18 (2.47) (8.56) 142.17
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ................................ 153.78 17.04 (2.75) (8.20) 159.87
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ................................ 194.07 20.97 (3.47) (12.51) 199.06
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ................................ 133.47 16.15 (2.39) (9.33) 137.90
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ................................ 140.20 17.78 (2.51) (9.76) 145.71
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. ............. 277.58 24.78 (4.97) (16.62) 280.77
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. ...... 223.13 20.14 (3.99) (16.85) 222.43
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ................................ 172.10 10.64 (3.08) (9.62) 170.04
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ................................ 224.67 22.98 (4.02) (13.25) 230.38
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ................................ 161.34 21.31 (2.89) (14.38) 165.38
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. ............... 267.16 24.39 (4.78) (16.82) 269.95
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. .......................... 194.73 24.00 (3.49) (15.03) 200.21
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ................................ 193.80 24.23 (3.47) (15.03) 199.53
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. .......................... 200.25 23.92 (3.59) (12.85) 207.73
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ................................ 200.25 24.05 (3.59) (12.85) 207.86
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. ........... 204.54 32.10 (3.66) (20.23) 212.75
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. ........... 382.32 26.85 (6.85) (19.38) 382.94
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. ............... 249.19 23.09 (4.46) (19.75) 248.07
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P............................ 239.58 31.69 (4.29) (20.40) 246.58
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.................................. 239.58 32.24 (4.29) (20.40) 247.13
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P............................ 334.79 30.88 (5.99) (18.63) 341.05
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.................................. 334.79 31.07 (5.99) (18.63) 341.24
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P............................ 286.38 28.93 (5.13) (17.26) 292.92
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.................................. 286.38 27.05 (5.13) (17.26) 291.04
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P............. 336.82 58.49 (6.03) (20.76) 368.52
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P................. 345.73 32.64 (6.19) (20.42) 351.76
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P............................ 325.18 33.65 (5.82) (20.93) 332.08
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.................................. 325.19 34.23 (5.82) (20.93) 332.67
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P............................ 273.19 30.92 (4.89) (19.07) 280.15
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.................................. 272.72 31.03 (4.88) (19.07) 279.80
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P................. 280.87 27.07 (5.03) (18.24) 284.67
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P............................ 241.78 30.00 (4.33) (18.61) 248.84
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.................................. 241.78 30.61 (4.33) (18.61) 249.45
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P............................ 271.69 26.06 (4.86) (20.34) 272.55
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.................................. 272.05 26.27 (4.87) (20.34) 273.11
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P............................ 243.95 23.39 (4.37) (15.22) 247.75
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.................................. 243.96 22.68 (4.37) (15.22) 247.05
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P................. 305.52 28.37 (5.47) (20.44) 307.98
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev., L.P............. 311.48 27.40 (5.58) (22.40) 310.90
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.................................. 403.07 33.61 (7.22) (26.41) 403.05
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.................................. 441.41 36.88 (7.90) (25.28) 445.11
A-4
TABLE 4
OWNERSHIP PERCENTAGE AND MERGER VALUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO
NONMANAGING GENERAL PARTNERS OTHER THAN PIONEER USA
NONMANAGING
NONMANAGING GENERAL GENERAL PARTNERS'
PARTNERS(A) MERGER VALUE AS A
------------------------ PERCENTAGE OF
OWNERSHIP MERGER MERGER VALUE
PERCENTAGE(B) VALUE(C) FOR THE PARTNERSHIP(D)
------------- -------- ------------------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................................ 2.00% $16,888 1.86%
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ............................... 1.00% 6,535 0.94%
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................................ 1.13% 13,871 1.07%
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ............................... 0.84% 13,187 0.80%
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .............................. 0.94% 9,927 0.90%
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ................................ 1.05% 37,202 1.02%
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ................................ 1.05% 49,882 1.01%
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ................................ 1.13% 55,855 1.09%
---------------
(a) Represents four unaffiliated individuals' partnership interests as limited
partners of each nonmanaging general partner. Excludes Pioneer USA's
partnership interests as general partner of each nonmanaging general
partner.
(b) Percentage owned is based upon ownership within the partnership as set
forth in the revenue sharing provisions of the partnership agreement for
the partnership.
(c) See "Method of Determining Merger Value for Each Partnership and Amount of
Pioneer Parent Common Stock Offered."
(d) Represents the dollar amount in the nonmanaging general partners' merger
value column divided by the merger value for the partnership as set forth
in Table 2.
A-5
TABLE 5
OWNERSHIP PERCENTAGE AND MERGER VALUE
ATTRIBUTABLE TO PIONEER USA IN ITS CAPACITIES AS
GENERAL PARTNER, NONMANAGING GENERAL PARTNER AND LIMITED PARTNER
PIONEER USA'S
PIONEER USA(A) MERGER VALUE AS A
-------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF
OWNERSHIP MERGER MERGER VALUE
PERCENTAGE(B) VALUE(C) FOR THE PARTNERSHIP(D)
------------- ---------- ----------------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................................ 27.38% $ 235,285 25.97%
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ............................... 24.41% 160,791 23.17%
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................................ 32.66% 410,553 31.76%
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ............................... 27.43% 433,854 26.18%
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .............................. 28.54% 305,910 27.72%
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ................................ 26.99% 962,385 26.29%
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ................................ 27.39% 1,310,513 26.61%
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ................................ 26.34% 1,313,732 25.70%
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ................................ 2.93% 39,179 2.93%
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ................................ 1.72% 20,208 1.72%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. ............. 3.38% 47,872 3.38%
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. ...... 2.69% 28,332 2.69%
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ................................ 1.34% 23,353 1.34%
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ................................ 1.74% 69,533 1.74%
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ................................ 1.31% 42,190 1.31%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. ............... 1.00% 13,416 1.00%
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. .......................... 1.90% 14,805 1.90%
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ................................ 1.60% 92,985 1.60%
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. .......................... 1.20% 12,399 1.20%
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ................................ 1.22% 51,532 1.22%
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. ........... 1.35% 35,395 1.35%
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. ........... 2.59% 61,106 2.59%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. ............... 1.00% 26,261 1.00%
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P............................ 2.31% 21,776 2.31%
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.................................. 2.32% 75,042 2.32%
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P............................ 1.54% 19,347 1.54%
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.................................. 2.04% 62,940 2.04%
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P............................ 1.29% 13,021 1.29%
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.................................. 1.20% 8,602 1.20%
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P............. 1.69% 35,259 1.69%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P................. 1.00% 35,389 1.00%
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P............................ 1.00% 9,382 1.00%
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.................................. 2.25% 62,877 2.25%
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P............................ 1.31% 23,451 1.31%
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.................................. 2.03% 39,784 2.03%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P................. 1.56% 31,687 1.56%
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P............................ 1.59% 9,413 1.59%
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.................................. 3.14% 53,832 3.14%
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P............................ 1.67% 54,557 1.67%
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.................................. 1.25% 111,674 1.25%
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P............................ 1.39% 26,279 1.39%
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.................................. 1.22% 36,882 1.22%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P................. 1.54% 52,606 1.54%
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev., L.P............. 1.00% 16,330 1.00%
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.................................. 1.38% 65,445 1.38%
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.................................. 1.09% 55,026 1.09%
---------------
(a) Represents Pioneer USA's partnership interests in each partnership as: (1)
the sole or managing general partner of the partnership; (2) a limited
partner of the partnership; and (3) the sole general partner of each
nonmanaging general partner. Pioneer USA will not receive any Pioneer
Parent common stock for its partnership interests in any participating
partnership. However, as a result of the merger of each participating
partnership, Pioneer USA will own 100% of the properties of the partnership
including properties attributable to its partnership interests in the
partnership.
(b) Percentage owned is based upon ownership within the partnership as set
forth in the revenue sharing provisions of the partnership agreement for
the partnership.
(c) See "Method of Determining Merger Value for Each Partnership and Amount of
Pioneer Parent Common Stock Offered."
(d) Represents the dollar amount in Pioneer USA's merger value column divided
by the merger value for the partnership as set forth in Table 2.
A-6
TABLE 6
VOTING PERCENTAGE AND INITIAL INVESTMENT OWNED BY PIONEER USA
IN ITS CAPACITY AS A LIMITED PARTNER
AS OF JULY 31, 2001
INITIAL
INVESTMENT
PIONEER USA OWNED BY
VOTING PIONEER USA(D)
PERCENTAGE(A)(B) (IN THOUSANDS)
---------------- --------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.................................. 5.84% $ 433
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd................................. 0.55% 35
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.................................. 11.71% 1,382
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd................................. 4.37% 535
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd................................ 5.97% 411
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.................................. 4.06% 791
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.................................. 4.59% 1,072
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.................................. 3.28% 638
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.(c).............................. 0.00% 187
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.(c).............................. 0.00% 58
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd.(c)........... 0.00% 120
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.(c).... 0.00% 80
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.................................. 0.35% 35
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.................................. 0.74% 128
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.................................. 0.31% 60
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.(c)............. 0.00% --
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd............................ 0.91% 35
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd.................................. 0.61% 175
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd............................ 0.20% 10
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.................................. 0.22% 45
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd............. 0.35% 43
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd............. 1.61% 98
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd................. 0.00% --
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P............................ 1.32% 50
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.................................. 1.34% 173
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P............................ 0.55% 20
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.................................. 1.05% 94
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P............................ 0.29% 10
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.................................. 0.21% 5
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P............. 0.70% 39
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P................. 0.00% --
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P............................ 0.00% --
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.................................. 1.26% 105
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P............................ 0.32% 20
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.................................. 1.04% 72
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P................. 0.57% 40
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P............................ 0.59% 14
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.................................. 2.16% 147
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P............................ 0.67% 80
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.................................. 0.26% 83
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P............................ 0.40% 30
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.................................. 0.22% 27
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P................. 0.55% 60
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev., L.P............. 0.00% --
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.(c).............................. 0.00% 45
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.(c).............................. 0.00% 10
---------------
(a) Represents Pioneer USA's partnership interests in each partnership as a
limited partner of the partnership. Pioneer USA will not receive any
Pioneer Parent common stock for its partnership interests in any
participating partnership. However, as a result of the merger of each
participating partnership, Pioneer USA will own 100% of the properties of
the partnership including properties attributable to its partnership
interests in the partnership.
(b) Represents percentage of limited partners' vote that Pioneer USA is
entitled to vote. The voting percentage is calculated by dividing (1)
Pioneer USA's ownership percentage of the partnership interests held as a
limited partner, by (2) the percentage of partnership interests held by all
limited partners in the partnership. For example, if the limited partners
of a partnership represent 99% of the partnership and Pioneer USA owns 5%
of the partnership interests as a limited partner in that partnership,
Pioneer USA's voting percentage is 5.05%.
(c) Pioneer USA is not entitled to vote partnership interests it holds as
limited partner in this partnership.
(d) Represents Pioneer USA's share of the initial investment by limited
partners as shown on Table 1.
A-7
TABLE 7
HISTORICAL QUARTERLY PARTNERSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS TO THE LIMITED PARTNERS
PER $1,000 INVESTMENT
FROM INCEPTION THROUGH JULY 31, 2001
QUARTERLY DISTRIBUTIONS TO LIMITED PARTNERS PER $1,000 INVESTMENT(A)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
INCEPTION QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
TO ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED
12/31/98 3/31/99 6/30/99 9/30/99 12/31/99 3/31/00 6/30/00
--------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ....... $ 616.71 $0.69 $ -- $ 3.26 $ 2.42 $ 4.24 $ 5.53
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ...... 808.37 -- 0.35 1.26 2.71 2.01 2.99
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ....... 946.73 0.62 0.53 2.03 1.09 3.93 4.77
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ...... 1,099.24 0.83 -- 3.34 3.48 4.98 6.07
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. ..... 924.16 -- 1.69 2.92 5.07 7.49 7.80
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ....... 1,264.54 -- -- 4.11 5.20 7.22 7.30
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ....... 1,458.60 0.96 1.79 4.89 6.30 8.70 9.68
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ....... 1,384.63 0.80 2.78 4.69 6.81 8.28 11.17
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ....... 678.73 0.83 1.49 4.98 9.55 7.09 11.26
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ....... 876.32 -- 3.17 4.12 7.19 7.95 9.04
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
85-A, Ltd. ...................... 997.86 3.16 5.23 8.79 12.34 15.51 20.44
Parker & Parsley Selected 85
Private Investment, Ltd. ........ 872.24 1.66 -- 4.33 6.68 9.18 11.68
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ....... 1,279.93 0.79 2.23 6.38 5.82 8.66 11.38
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ....... 1,469.69 1.53 5.01 5.85 8.40 10.40 13.08
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ....... 1,401.81 0.82 2.38 1.77 7.30 8.35 9.67
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
86, Ltd. ........................ 1,525.50 1.23 1.22 5.88 5.44 14.07 9.36
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv.,
Ltd. ............................ 1,228.63 1.83 2.20 6.07 7.90 11.58 15.18
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ....... 1,228.70 1.83 2.20 6.07 7.90 11.58 15.18
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv.,
Ltd. ............................ 1,154.18 1.85 2.29 5.50 8.64 10.07 12.58
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ....... 1,154.25 1.85 2.29 5.50 8.64 10.07 12.58
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. ........... 889.65 1.49 0.89 6.21 9.75 10.92 13.50
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. ........... 956.04 3.97 1.02 8.98 13.99 18.53 24.65
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
87, Ltd. ........................ 1,457.32 2.20 4.09 8.56 9.55 12.55 13.19
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 991.51 3.16 3.06 7.97 11.11 12.48 15.67
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ....... 991.61 3.16 3.06 7.97 11.11 12.48 15.67
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 966.33 3.44 2.88 8.95 13.65 18.22 20.69
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ....... 966.37 3.44 2.88 8.95 13.65 18.22 20.69
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 913.42 3.92 2.34 4.27 11.12 16.38 18.34
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ....... 913.01 3.92 2.34 4.27 11.12 16.38 18.34
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P. ........... 1,075.69 6.51 4.02 7.58 11.34 21.95 19.09
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
88, L.P. ........................ 1,031.07 3.57 6.66 8.39 12.47 15.99 19.23
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 911.13 2.66 2.77 9.16 13.97 17.96 18.39
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ....... 911.19 2.66 2.77 9.16 13.97 17.96 18.39
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 787.19 3.26 1.22 8.31 11.43 14.28 18.94
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ....... 787.20 3.26 1.22 8.31 11.43 14.28 18.94
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
89, L.P. ........................ 689.19 1.02 1.85 6.67 4.97 13.32 15.00
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 784.83 3.18 1.68 8.12 9.46 12.70 14.52
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ....... 784.89 3.18 1.68 8.12 9.46 12.70 14.52
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 600.45 2.10 1.80 7.47 11.46 14.98 15.20
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ....... 600.53 2.10 1.80 7.47 11.46 14.98 15.20
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 537.51 0.95 -- 6.26 10.83 13.62 14.90
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ....... 537.52 0.95 -- 6.26 10.83 13.62 14.90
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
90, L.P. ........................ 673.63 2.14 3.11 5.62 12.23 15.05 18.11
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry
Private Dev., L.P. .............. 632.08 3.71 3.09 6.40 13.59 16.68 13.98
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ....... 663.47 3.99 6.33 11.37 15.54 20.76 23.19
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ....... 526.98 3.95 7.05 13.55 18.24 21.87 26.88
QUARTERLY DISTRIBUTIONS TO LIMITED PARTNERS PER $1,000 INVESTMENT(A)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER MONTH INCEPTION
ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED TO
9/30/00 12/31/00 3/31/01 6/30/01 7/31/01 7/31/01
------- -------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ....... $ 4.53 $ 5.41 $ 6.91 $ -- $ 7.43 $ 657.13
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ...... 5.00 5.97 6.88 -- 6.33 841.87
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ....... 6.70 4.06 8.08 -- 7.39 985.93
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ...... 4.58 6.41 8.01 -- 5.04 1,141.98
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. ..... 9.38 8.84 10.27 -- 7.72 985.34
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ....... 9.04 10.25 12.04 -- 8.56 1,328.26
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ....... 11.28 10.66 11.10 -- 8.20 1,532.16
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ....... 12.41 13.00 14.37 -- 12.51 1,471.45
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ....... 9.94 10.41 13.70 -- 9.33 757.31
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ....... 9.26 12.47 15.53 -- 9.76 954.81
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
85-A, Ltd. ...................... 16.65 16.32 18.72 -- 16.62 1,131.64
Parker & Parsley Selected 85
Private Investment, Ltd. ........ 12.92 12.98 18.63 -- 16.85 967.15
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ....... 12.54 13.08 18.73 -- 9.62 1,369.16
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ....... 14.24 15.95 18.32 -- 13.25 1,575.72
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ....... 12.04 12.45 15.95 -- 14.38 1,486.92
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
86, Ltd. ........................ 17.03 15.11 22.67 -- 16.82 1,634.33
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv.,
Ltd. ............................ 13.96 12.79 16.86 -- 15.03 1,332.03
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ....... 13.96 12.79 16.86 -- 15.03 1,332.10
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv.,
Ltd. ............................ 13.53 12.84 17.13 -- 12.85 1,251.46
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ....... 13.53 12.84 17.13 -- 12.85 1,251.53
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. ........... 12.12 14.11 21.51 -- 20.23 1,000.38
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. ........... 26.75 26.21 27.53 -- 19.38 1,127.05
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
87, Ltd. ........................ 14.14 16.03 18.36 -- 19.75 1,575.74
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 17.33 16.95 20.80 -- 20.40 1,120.44
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ....... 17.33 16.95 20.80 -- 20.40 1,120.54
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 22.63 25.37 28.91 -- 18.63 1,129.70
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ....... 22.63 25.37 28.91 -- 18.63 1,129.74
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 19.83 21.01 24.91 -- 17.26 1,052.80
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ....... 19.83 21.01 24.91 -- 17.26 1,052.39
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P. ........... 18.82 21.76 27.21 -- 20.76 1,234.73
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
88, L.P. ........................ 23.09 21.51 23.55 -- 20.42 1,185.95
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 20.40 23.38 29.49 -- 20.93 1,070.24
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ....... 20.40 23.38 29.49 -- 20.93 1,070.30
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 20.23 20.99 26.50 -- 19.07 931.42
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ....... 20.23 20.99 26.50 -- 19.07 931.43
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
89, L.P. ........................ 16.66 20.33 13.22 -- 18.24 800.47
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 17.43 19.18 19.99 -- 18.61 909.70
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ....... 17.43 19.18 19.99 -- 18.61 909.76
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 19.51 19.68 23.73 -- 20.34 736.72
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ....... 19.51 19.68 23.73 -- 20.34 736.80
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv.,
L.P. ............................ 19.01 17.84 21.19 -- 15.22 657.33
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ....... 19.01 17.84 21.18 -- 15.22 657.33
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
90, L.P. ........................ 20.29 25.10 27.49 -- 20.44 823.21
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry
Private Dev., L.P. .............. 14.00 13.98 20.44 -- 22.40 760.35
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ....... 26.03 30.05 27.29 -- 26.41 854.43
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ....... 33.92 35.07 24.81 -- 25.28 737.60
---------------
(a) Past cash distributions to limited partners are not necessarily indicative
of future cash distributions. Limited partners should not assume that any
nonparticipating partnership will continue to make cash distributions at
levels similar to those shown. See "The Merger of Each
Partnership -- Distribution of Pioneer Parent Common Stock."
A-8
TABLE 8
ANNUAL REPURCHASE PRICES AND AGGREGATE ANNUAL REPURCHASE PAYMENTS
2001 2000 1999
----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
REPURCHASE AGGREGATE REPURCHASE AGGREGATE REPURCHASE AGGREGATE
PRICE PER ANNUAL PRICE PER ANNUAL PRICE PER ANNUAL
$1,000 REPURCHASE $1,000 REPURCHASE $1,000 REPURCHASE
INVESTMENT PAYMENTS INVESTMENT PAYMENTS INVESTMENT PAYMENTS
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd............... $137.97 $ 15,298 $ 71.89 $ 4,745 $ 7.52 $ 94
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd.............. 133.72 10,822 102.38 1,024 26.17 131
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd............. 151.60 -- 109.73 1,097 12.17 284
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd............... 196.67 22,072 137.59 9,494 27.05 541
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd............... 210.15 39,967 153.89 3,078 43.46 --
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd............... 267.03 56,737 175.78 7,031 45.72 1,143
-------- ------- ------
$144,896 $26,469 $2,193
======== ======= ======
A-9
TABLE 9
PARTICIPATION IN COSTS AND REVENUES OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
CAPITAL COSTS REVENUES AND EXPENSES
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
NONMANAGING NONMANAGING
GENERAL LIMITED GENERAL LIMITED
PIONEER USA(A) PARTNERS(A) PARTNERS(A) PIONEER USA(A) PARTNERS(A) PARTNERS(A)
-------------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ----------- -----------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ............ 8% 2% 90% 20% 5% 75%
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ........... 8% 2% 90% 20% 5% 75%
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ............ 8% 2% 90% 20% 5% 75%
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ........... 8% 2% 90% 20% 5% 75%
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .......... 8% 2% 90% 20% 5% 75%
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.(b).......... 8% 2% 90% 20% 5% 75%
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.(b).......... 8% 2% 90% 20% 5% 75%
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.(b).......... 8% 2% 90% 20% 5% 75%
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment
85-A, Ltd. ............................ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private
Investment, Ltd. ...................... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86,
Ltd. .................................. 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. ...... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. ...... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
87-A, Ltd. ............................ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
87-B, Ltd. ............................ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87,
Ltd. .................................. 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. ...... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. ...... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. ...... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
88-A, L.P. ............................ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88,
L.P. .................................. 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. ...... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. ...... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89,
L.P. .................................. 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. ...... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. ...... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. ...... 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90,
L.P. .................................. 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private
Dev., L.P. ............................ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ............ 1% -- 99% 1% -- 99%
---------------
(a) These percentages represent the sharing ownerships as set forth in the
prospectus for each partnership. Includes Pioneer USA's partnership
interests in each partnership as: (1) the sole or managing general partner
of the partnership; (2) a limited partner of the partnership; and (3) the
sole general partner of each nonmanaging general partner. Pioneer USA will
not receive any Pioneer Parent common stock for its partnership interests
in any participating partnership.
(b) Incremental direct costs 100% to limited partners.
A-10
TABLE 10
AVERAGE OIL, NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS AND GAS SALES PRICES AND PRODUCTION COSTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 AND
2000 AND THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998
AVERAGE SALES PRICE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OIL (PER BBL) NGL (PER BBL)
------------------------------------------ -----------------------------------------
FOR THE SIX FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
--------------- ------------------------ --------------- -----------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 2001 2000 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ............. $27.89 $27.49 $29.26 $16.94 $13.33 $15.26 $13.83 $14.60 $ 9.22 $6.40
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ............ 27.41 27.24 29.26 16.67 13.16 17.43 14.40 15.59 8.70 6.73
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ............. 27.66 27.45 29.39 16.61 13.32 16.58 13.16 14.44 8.96 7.20
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ............ 27.79 27.51 29.47 17.08 13.14 17.15 13.63 15.01 9.80 6.93
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. ........... 27.93 27.90 29.67 17.13 13.31 15.02 12.30 13.86 9.13 6.42
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ............. 27.56 27.55 29.54 16.96 13.34 16.66 14.30 15.58 9.42 6.49
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ............. 27.63 27.78 29.69 17.18 13.30 16.64 14.10 15.47 10.00 6.79
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ............. 27.02 27.63 29.55 17.36 13.30 14.22 13.27 14.00 9.03 6.08
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ............. 27.71 27.78 29.38 17.11 13.27 16.01 13.12 14.20 9.71 6.51
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ............. 27.95 28.58 30.02 18.07 13.30 16.85 14.29 15.96 10.10 6.95
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A,
Ltd. .................................. 27.93 28.37 30.19 16.91 13.20 15.56 13.98 15.22 9.95 6.49
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private
Investment, Ltd. ...................... 27.92 27.61 29.59 17.27 13.44 16.24 14.13 15.52 10.49 6.99
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ............. 27.73 27.71 28.87 17.00 13.32 16.75 14.19 14.94 9.63 6.53
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ............. 27.88 27.57 29.45 17.18 13.08 16.48 13.43 15.00 9.39 6.80
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ............. 27.42 27.64 29.43 17.18 13.26 15.98 13.72 15.06 9.27 6.46
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86,
Ltd. .................................. 27.77 27.85 29.45 17.34 13.34 16.28 13.35 15.01 9.27 6.69
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. ....... 27.45 27.41 29.46 17.06 13.22 16.73 14.63 16.01 9.81 6.76
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ............. 27.45 27.41 29.46 17.06 13.22 16.73 14.63 16.01 9.81 6.76
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. ....... 27.14 27.30 29.31 16.71 13.17 17.29 15.08 16.90 9.73 6.82
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ............. 27.14 27.30 29.31 16.71 13.17 17.29 15.08 16.90 9.73 6.82
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
87-A, Ltd. ............................ 27.14 27.33 29.34 16.80 13.04 11.84 11.41 12.12 7.32 5.46
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
87-B, Ltd. ............................ 26.89 27.96 29.36 17.44 13.05 17.04 14.82 16.68 10.32 6.58
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87,
Ltd. .................................. 27.01 28.16 29.56 16.82 13.05 16.91 14.34 16.17 9.41 6.55
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. ....... 26.40 28.50 29.28 16.91 13.59 16.19 13.81 15.30 9.30 6.57
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ............. 26.40 28.50 29.28 16.91 13.59 16.19 13.81 15.30 9.30 6.57
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. ....... 28.24 26.91 29.29 17.17 13.24 17.47 14.08 16.02 10.03 6.91
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ............. 28.24 26.91 29.29 17.17 13.24 17.47 14.08 16.02 10.03 6.91
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. ....... 28.40 26.96 29.33 17.24 13.30 17.07 13.94 15.83 10.42 6.94
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ............. 28.40 26.96 29.33 17.24 13.30 17.07 13.94 15.83 10.42 6.94
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
88-A, L.P. ............................ 27.18 27.71 29.44 16.82 13.14 14.40 13.93 14.28 9.18 6.31
A-11
AVERAGE SALES PRICE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OIL (PER BBL) NGL (PER BBL)
------------------------------------------ -----------------------------------------
FOR THE SIX FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
--------------- ------------------------ --------------- -----------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 2001 2000 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88,
L.P. .................................. 27.55 27.54 29.45 17.01 13.31 16.27 14.01 15.61 9.32 6.79
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. ....... 27.77 27.56 29.59 17.11 13.23 14.50 13.74 15.42 9.54 6.95
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ............. 27.77 27.56 29.59 17.11 13.23 14.50 13.74 15.42 9.54 6.95
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. ....... 27.69 27.44 29.21 16.96 13.26 17.02 13.93 15.56 9.57 6.94
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ............. 27.69 27.44 29.21 16.96 13.26 17.02 13.93 15.56 9.57 6.94
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89,
L.P. .................................. 27.14 27.07 29.00 17.06 13.28 14.90 13.37 14.86 8.69 6.57
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. ....... 27.89 27.46 29.32 17.06 13.20 16.87 13.56 15.62 9.58 7.02
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ............. 27.89 27.46 29.32 17.06 13.20 16.87 13.56 15.62 9.58 7.02
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. ....... 28.26 27.72 29.23 17.23 13.12 16.09 14.00 15.45 9.49 6.60
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ............. 28.26 27.72 29.23 17.23 13.12 16.09 14.00 15.45 9.49 6.60
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. ....... 27.55 27.46 29.34 17.13 13.24 16.04 12.80 14.91 9.31 6.80
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ............. 27.55 27.46 29.34 17.13 13.24 16.04 12.80 14.91 9.31 6.80
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90,
L.P. .................................. 27.78 27.42 29.35 17.30 13.19 17.09 14.06 15.82 9.46 6.77
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private
Dev., L.P. ............................ 27.13 27.19 29.17 17.04 13.06 16.74 13.22 15.56 9.70 6.89
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ............. 27.42 27.85 29.90 17.57 13.15 12.09 13.94 14.94 9.34 6.44
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ............. 27.93 28.58 30.09 17.90 13.33 16.07 14.84 16.50 10.15 6.79
AVERAGE SALES PRICE AVERAGE PRODUCTION COSTS (LIFTING)
-------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
GAS (PER MCF) COST PER EQUIVALENT (BBL)(A)
-------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
FOR THE SIX FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
-------------- --------------------- ---------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 2001 2000 2000 1999 1998
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------- ------ ----- -----
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................. $4.83 $$2.60 $3.22 $1.78 $1.78 $10.13 $ 9.37 $ 9.52 $8.39 $8.74
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ................ 5.12 2.26 3.07 1.82 1.80 13.40 12.28 11.46 8.57 8.80
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................. 4.77 2.71 3.29 1.95 1.82 12.32 11.42 11.91 9.80 9.88
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ................ 5.07 2.33 2.98 1.79 1.64 12.61 9.39 10.25 8.09 7.88
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. ............... 4.34 1.95 2.54 1.65 1.53 11.44 8.75 9.20 8.06 9.00
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ................. 4.95 2.27 3.02 1.78 1.60 12.32 10.82 10.52 8.64 8.76
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ................. 4.80 2.13 2.83 1.66 1.54 13.54 8.95 9.12 7.60 8.27
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ................. 4.04 1.86 2.49 1.47 1.33 10.65 8.54 8.64 7.70 7.66
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ................. 4.75 2.04 2.66 1.70 1.56 12.14 9.57 9.66 7.02 8.70
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ................. 5.05 2.23 2.92 1.72 1.58 10.60 10.88 10.19 7.70 8.48
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A,
Ltd. ...................................... 4.55 1.92 2.65 1.54 1.41 8.66 7.77 7.78 6.40 6.96
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private
Investment, Ltd. .......................... 4.57 2.12 2.77 1.67 1.56 10.07 8.66 9.43 8.01 7.82
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ................. 4.74 1.96 2.56 1.57 1.46 14.09 8.95 8.86 7.83 9.36
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ................. 5.01 2.13 2.82 1.71 1.58 10.82 8.98 8.87 7.89 7.64
A-12
AVERAGE SALES PRICE AVERAGE PRODUCTION COSTS (LIFTING)
------------------------------------------ -----------------------------------------
GAS (PER MCF) COST PER EQUIVALENT (BBL)(A)
------------------------------------------ -----------------------------------------
FOR THE SIX FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
--------------- ------------------------ --------------- -----------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 2001 2000 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ............. 4.64 2.05 2.78 1.58 1.49 11.07 10.87 10.31 8.66 7.67
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86,
Ltd. .................................. 5.09 2.24 2.90 1.73 1.61 12.11 11.35 10.84 9.08 7.67
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. ....... 4.69 2.17 2.86 1.68 1.54 9.89 8.00 9.11 7.19 7.78
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ............. 4.69 2.17 2.86 1.68 1.54 9.89 8.00 9.11 7.19 7.78
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. ....... 5.13 2.13 2.98 1.64 1.49 11.64 8.37 8.63 7.44 6.65
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ............. 5.13 2.13 2.98 1.64 1.49 11.64 8.37 8.63 7.44 6.65
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
87-A, Ltd. ............................ 4.01 2.03 2.56 1.46 1.23 11.65 11.81 12.48 8.97 9.26
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
87-B, Ltd. ............................ 4.86 2.09 2.88 1.62 1.46 12.13 8.84 8.42 8.30 7.84
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87,
Ltd. .................................. 4.78 2.24 2.99 1.71 1.59 9.91 9.65 9.13 6.77 6.81
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. ....... 4.25 2.19 2.99 1.69 1.56 9.18 9.35 8.85 5.98 7.06
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ............. 4.25 2.19 2.99 1.69 1.56 9.18 9.35 8.85 5.98 7.06
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. ....... 6.03 2.12 2.87 1.70 1.56 10.33 7.49 7.84 7.04 7.51
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ............. 6.03 2.12 2.87 1.70 1.56 10.33 7.49 7.84 7.04 7.51
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. ....... 5.64 2.10 2.82 1.70 1.55 10.23 7.81 8.10 7.43 7.84
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ............. 5.64 2.10 2.82 1.70 1.55 10.23 7.81 8.10 7.43 7.84
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
88-A, L.P. ............................ 4.35 1.90 2.55 1.48 1.41 8.61 11.63 9.69 6.31 5.87
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88,
L.P. .................................. 4.88 2.11 2.82 1.69 1.55 9.69 7.45 7.57 6.04 6.60
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. ....... 5.03 2.35 3.07 1.81 1.74 9.67 8.85 8.23 6.75 6.92
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ............. 5.03 2.35 3.07 1.81 1.74 9.67 8.85 8.23 6.75 6.92
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. ....... 4.91 2.18 2.90 1.72 1.60 10.36 8.32 8.59 7.58 7.30
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ............. 4.91 2.18 2.90 1.72 1.60 10.36 8.32 8.59 7.58 7.30
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89,
L.P. .................................. 4.53 1.96 2.73 1.57 1.46 12.80 9.08 8.99 8.69 6.80
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. ....... 4.98 2.20 2.94 1.76 1.64 10.06 9.08 9.43 7.38 6.93
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ............. 4.98 2.20 2.94 1.76 1.64 10.06 9.08 9.43 7.38 6.93
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. ....... 4.79 2.08 2.84 1.62 1.50 9.51 8.65 8.68 7.28 7.31
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ............. 4.79 2.08 2.84 1.62 1.50 9.51 8.65 8.68 7.28 7.31
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. ....... 4.91 2.11 2.89 1.70 1.55 11.40 8.60 8.83 7.93 8.22
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ............. 4.91 2.11 2.89 1.70 1.55 11.40 8.60 8.83 7.93 8.22
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90,
L.P. .................................. 4.97 2.14 2.90 1.72 1.57 9.52 7.73 8.22 7.01 8.24
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private
Dev., L.P. ............................ 4.95 2.12 2.91 1.65 1.60 8.13 9.17 8.97 7.41 7.44
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ............. 5.35 2.27 3.06 1.70 1.56 9.32 7.57 7.38 6.31 6.04
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ............. 4.70 2.14 2.93 1.61 1.47 9.62 6.57 6.88 5.72 5.96
---------------
(a) Gas production is converted to oil equivalents at the rate of six mcf per
barrel, representing the relative energy content of natural gas and oil.
A-13
TABLE 11
PROVED RESERVES ATTRIBUTABLE TO PIONEER USA,
NONMANAGING GENERAL PARTNERS AND LIMITED PARTNERS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2000
TOTAL PROVED RESERVES
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NONMANAGING GENERAL
PIONEER USA(A) PARTNERS(B) LIMITED PARTNERS(C) TOTAL(D)
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
OIL & OIL & OIL & OIL &
NGL (BBLS) GAS (MCF) NGL (BBLS) GAS (MCF) NGL (BBLS) GAS (MCF) NGL (BBLS) GAS (MCF)
---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parker & Parsley 81-I,
Ltd. ..................... 57,816 116,841 4,224 8,535 149,140 301,399 211,180 426,775
Parker & Parsley 81-II,
Ltd. ..................... 49,524 72,494 2,029 2,970 151,342 221,535 202,895 296,999
Parker & Parsley 82-I,
Ltd. ..................... 116,859 262,924 4,026 9,058 236,971 533,163 357,856 805,145
Parker & Parsley 82-II,
Ltd. ..................... 111,975 171,077 3,444 5,262 292,783 447,315 408,202 623,654
Parker & Parsley 82-III,
Ltd. ..................... 88,780 85,126 2,916 2,796 219,396 210,367 311,092 298,289
Parker & Parsley 83-A,
Ltd. ..................... 280,513 416,062 10,912 16,185 747,838 1,109,206 1,039,263 1,541,453
Parker & Parsley 83-B,
Ltd. ..................... 348,652 567,327 13,365 21,748 910,884 1,482,192 1,272,901 2,071,267
Parker & Parsley 84-A,
Ltd. ..................... 355,491 589,384 15,185 25,176 979,100 1,623,291 1,349,776 2,237,851
Parker & Parsley 85-A,
Ltd. ..................... 11,187 15,154 -- -- 371,156 502,769 382,343 517,923
Parker & Parsley 85-B,
Ltd. ..................... 5,233 7,901 -- -- 299,222 451,758 304,455 459,659
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 85-A, Ltd. .... 11,095 12,053 -- -- 317,553 344,957 328,648 357,010
Parker & Parsley Selected 85
Private Investment,
Ltd. ..................... 6,238 10,351 -- -- 225,761 374,615 231,999 384,966
Parker & Parsley 86-A,
Ltd. ..................... 6,075 11,653 -- -- 446,620 856,663 452,695 868,316
Parker & Parsley 86-B,
Ltd. ..................... 16,246 21,064 -- -- 919,385 1,192,033 935,631 1,213,097
Parker & Parsley 86-C,
Ltd. ..................... 11,745 16,465 -- -- 886,520 1,242,812 898,265 1,259,277
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 86, Ltd. ...... 3,174 4,960 -- -- 314,198 491,002 317,372 495,962
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv.,
Ltd. ..................... 3,451 5,510 -- -- 178,340 284,684 181,791 290,194
Parker & Parsley 87-A,
Ltd. ..................... 21,378 34,166 -- -- 1,313,604 2,099,440 1,334,982 2,133,606
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv.,
Ltd. ..................... 2,988 4,431 -- -- 245,753 364,425 248,741 368,856
Parker & Parsley 87-B,
Ltd. ..................... 12,411 18,405 -- -- 1,003,438 1,487,986 1,015,849 1,506,391
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. .... 9,632 9,615 -- -- 704,591 703,402 714,223 713,017
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. .... 13,937 22,316 -- -- 523,830 838,757 537,767 861,073
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 87, Ltd. ...... 7,631 9,691 -- -- 755,457 959,391 763,088 969,082
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv.,
L.P. ..................... 5,253 7,315 -- -- 222,619 310,018 227,872 317,333
Parker & Parsley 88-A,
L.P. ..................... 18,059 25,149 -- -- 758,976 1,056,963 777,035 1,082,112
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv.,
L.P. ..................... 4,220 5,515 -- -- 269,028 351,572 273,248 357,087
Parker & Parsley 88-B,
L.P. ..................... 13,722 17,933 -- -- 659,140 861,434 672,862 879,367
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv.,
L.P. ..................... 2,870 4,039 -- -- 219,589 308,985 222,459 313,024
Parker & Parsley 88-C,
L.P. ..................... 1,908 2,685 -- -- 156,634 220,398 158,542 223,083
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P. .... 7,216 9,530 -- -- 420,265 555,001 427,481 564,531
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 88, L.P. ...... 7,708 9,375 -- -- 763,081 928,143 770,789 937,518
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv.,
L.P. ..................... 2,027 2,852 -- -- 200,631 282,306 202,658 285,158
Parker & Parsley 89-A,
L.P. ..................... 13,556 19,075 -- -- 588,978 828,781 602,534 847,856
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv.,
L.P. ..................... 5,782 7,927 -- -- 434,277 595,395 440,059 603,322
Parker & Parsley 89-B,
L.P. ..................... 9,810 13,454 -- -- 474,439 650,677 484,249 664,131
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 89, L.P. ...... 7,311 7,715 -- -- 461,062 486,555 468,373 494,270
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv.,
L.P. ..................... 2,145 2,701 -- -- 132,990 167,459 135,135 170,160
Parker & Parsley 90-A,
L.P. ..................... 12,362 15,527 -- -- 381,738 479,494 394,100 495,021
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv.,
L.P. ..................... 12,549 16,252 -- -- 740,794 959,455 753,343 975,707
Parker & Parsley 90-B,
L.P. ..................... 25,709 33,227 -- -- 2,023,300 2,615,035 2,049,009 2,648,262
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv.,
L.P. ..................... 6,507 6,522 -- -- 460,152 461,213 466,659 467,735
Parker & Parsley 90-C,
L.P. ..................... 9,158 9,179 -- -- 741,036 742,738 750,194 751,917
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 90, L.P. ...... 12,668 12,480 -- -- 809,113 797,112 821,781 809,592
Parker & Parsley 90
Spraberry Private Dev.,
L.P. ..................... 4,177 3,814 -- -- 413,544 377,597 417,721 381,411
Parker & Parsley 91-A,
L.P. ..................... 13,541 19,696 -- -- 965,302 1,404,059 978,843 1,423,755
Parker & Parsley 91-B,
L.P. ..................... 11,335 13,334 -- -- 1,030,441 1,212,237 1,041,776 1,225,571
--------- --------- ------ ------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total(d)............ 1,761,624 2,750,266 56,101 91,730 25,520,011 34,775,789 27,337,736 37,617,785
========= ========= ====== ====== ========== ========== ========== ==========
A-14
---------------
(a) Represents Pioneer USA's partnership interests in each partnership as: (1)
the sole or managing general partner of the partnership; (2) a limited
partner of the partnership; and (3) the sole general partner of each
nonmanaging general partner. Pioneer USA will not receive any Pioneer
Parent common stock for its partnership interests in any participating
partnership. However, as a result of the merger of each participating
partnership, Pioneer USA will acquire 100% of the properties of the
partnership including properties attributable to its partnership interests
in the partnerships.
(b) Represents four unaffiliated individuals' partnership interests as limited
partners of each nonmanaging general partner. Excludes Pioneer USA's
partnership interests as general partner of each nonmanaging general
partner.
(c) Represents the partnership interests of unaffiliated limited partners of
each partnership. Excludes Pioneer USA's partnership interests as a limited
partner of any partnership.
(d) Corresponds to amounts in the reserve report prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc. as of December 31, 2000.
A-15
TABLE 12
PARTNERSHIP ESTIMATED RESERVES ATTRIBUTABLE TO PIONEER USA,
NONMANAGING GENERAL PARTNERS AND LIMITED PARTNERS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2001
TOTAL PARTNERSHIP ESTIMATED RESERVES
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NONMANAGING GENERAL
PIONEER USA(A) PARTNERS(B) LIMITED PARTNERS(C) TOTAL
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
OIL & OIL & OIL & OIL &
NGL (BBLS) GAS (MCF) NGL (BBLS) GAS (MCF) NGL (BBLS) GAS (MCF) NGL (BBLS) GAS (MCF)
---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parker & Parsley 81-I,
Ltd. ..................... 46,238 91,778 3,346 6,646 125,199 247,549 174,783 345,973
Parker & Parsley 81-II,
Ltd. ..................... 37,856 54,560 1,550 2,235 117,486 167,519 156,892 224,314
Parker & Parsley 82-I,
Ltd. ..................... 84,829 185,562 2,911 6,366 173,823 380,596 261,563 572,524
Parker & Parsley 82-II,
Ltd. ..................... 86,492 129,054 2,653 3,952 230,855 348,686 320,000 481,692
Parker & Parsley 82-III,
Ltd. ..................... 70,391 67,377 2,307 2,200 176,169 171,797 248,867 241,374
Parker & Parsley 83-A,
Ltd. ..................... 218,795 326,786 8,511 12,712 583,300 871,199 810,606 1,210,697
Parker & Parsley 83-B,
Ltd. ..................... 291,206 465,689 11,163 17,852 760,802 1,216,655 1,063,171 1,700,196
Parker & Parsley 84-A,
Ltd. ..................... 292,862 491,568 12,510 20,998 806,606 1,353,885 1,111,978 1,866,451
Parker & Parsley 85-A,
Ltd. ..................... 8,049 11,144 -- -- 267,056 369,738 275,105 380,882
Parker & Parsley 85-B,
Ltd. ..................... 3,895 5,744 -- -- 222,695 328,446 226,590 334,190
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 85-A, Ltd. .... 9,194 10,026 -- -- 263,153 286,963 272,347 296,989
Parker & Parsley Selected 85
Private Investment,
Ltd. ..................... 5,597 9,285 -- -- 202,578 336,044 208,175 345,329
Parker & Parsley 86-A,
Ltd. ..................... 4,770 9,016 -- -- 350,649 662,775 355,419 671,791
Parker & Parsley 86-B,
Ltd. ..................... 13,311 17,664 -- -- 753,269 999,624 766,580 1,017,288
Parker & Parsley 86-C,
Ltd. ..................... 8,904 12,643 -- -- 672,110 954,330 681,014 966,973
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 86, Ltd. ...... 2,513 4,471 -- -- 248,765 442,678 251,278 447,149
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv.,
Ltd. ..................... 2,811 4,304 -- -- 145,236 222,406 148,047 226,710
Parker & Parsley 87-A,
Ltd. ..................... 17,506 26,769 -- -- 1,075,693 1,644,916 1,093,199 1,671,685
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv.,
Ltd. ..................... 2,452 3,631 -- -- 201,644 298,666 204,096 302,297
Parker & Parsley 87-B,
Ltd. ..................... 10,184 15,084 -- -- 823,376 1,219,535 833,560 1,234,619
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. .... 7,452 7,410 -- -- 545,101 542,077 552,553 549,487
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. .... 11,567 18,737 -- -- 434,740 704,226 446,307 722,963
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 87, Ltd. ...... 4,975 6,755 -- -- 492,481 668,737 497,456 675,492
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv.,
L.P....................... 4,230 5,908 -- -- 179,261 250,384 183,491 256,292
Parker & Parsley 88-A,
L.P....................... 14,543 20,313 -- -- 611,206 853,701 625,749 874,014
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv.,
L.P....................... 3,577 4,530 -- -- 228,017 288,783 231,594 293,313
Parker & Parsley 88-B,
L.P....................... 11,631 14,730 -- -- 558,694 707,581 570,325 722,311
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv.,
L.P....................... 2,409 3,281 -- -- 184,330 251,039 186,739 254,320
Parker & Parsley 88-C,
L.P....................... 1,602 2,182 -- -- 131,487 179,071 133,089 181,253
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P...... 6,217 7,922 -- -- 362,041 461,335 368,258 469,257
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 88, L.P........ 6,683 7,887 -- -- 661,637 780,792 668,320 788,679
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv.,
L.P....................... 1,762 2,851 -- -- 174,412 282,272 176,174 285,123
Parker & Parsley 89-A,
L.P....................... 11,786 19,075 -- -- 512,077 828,752 523,863 847,827
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv.,
L.P....................... 4,581 6,387 -- -- 344,057 479,732 348,638 486,119
Parker & Parsley 89-B,
L.P....................... 7,771 10,837 -- -- 375,814 524,126 383,585 534,963
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 89, L.P........ 6,188 6,426 -- -- 390,232 405,242 396,420 411,668
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv.,
L.P....................... 1,803 2,546 -- -- 111,776 157,839 113,579 160,385
Parker & Parsley 90-A,
L.P....................... 10,286 14,525 -- -- 317,641 448,546 327,927 463,071
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv.,
L.P....................... 10,577 13,469 -- -- 624,406 795,145 634,983 808,614
Parker & Parsley 90-B,
L.P....................... 21,654 27,526 -- -- 1,704,172 2,166,318 1,725,826 2,193,844
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv.,
L.P....................... 5,264 5,255 -- -- 372,246 371,637 377,510 376,892
Parker & Parsley 90-C,
L.P....................... 7,409 7,397 -- -- 599,484 598,503 606,893 605,900
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 90, L.P........ 9,699 9,806 -- -- 619,485 626,306 629,184 636,112
Parker & Parsley 90
Spraberry Private Dev.,
L.P....................... 3,771 3,374 -- -- 373,324 333,986 377,095 337,360
Parker & Parsley 91-A,
L.P....................... 11,694 16,775 -- -- 833,634 1,195,849 845,328 1,212,624
Parker & Parsley 91-B,
L.P....................... 10,272 12,121 -- -- 933,817 1,101,978 944,089 1,114,099
--------- --------- ------ ------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total............... 1,417,258 2,200,180 44,951 72,961 20,876,036 28,527,964 22,338,245 30,801,105
========= ========= ====== ====== ========== ========== ========== ==========
A-16
---------------
(a) Represents Pioneer USA's partnership interests in each partnership as: (1)
the sole or managing general partner of the partnership; (2) a limited
partner of the partnership; and (3) the sole general partner of each
nonmanaging general partner. Pioneer USA will not receive any Pioneer
Parent common stock for its partnership interests in any participating
partnership. However, as a result of the merger of each participating
partnership, Pioneer USA will acquire 100% of the properties of the
partnership including properties attributable to its partnership interests
in the partnerships.
(b) Represents four unaffiliated individuals' partnership interests as limited
partners of each nonmanaging general partner. Excludes Pioneer USA's
partnership interests as general partner of each nonmanaging general
partner.
(c) Represents the partnership interests of unaffiliated limited partners of
each partnership. Excludes Pioneer USA's partnership interests as a limited
partner of any partnership.
A-17
TABLE 13
OIL, NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS AND GAS PRODUCTION
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 AND
2000 AND THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998
OIL & NGL (BBLS) GAS (MCF)
----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
FOR THE SIX FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30,
----------------- --------------------------------- ---------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 2001 2000
------- ------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Parker & Parsley 81-I,
Ltd. ...................... 6,368 7,036 13,976 14,970 13,937 12,725 12,333
Parker & Parsley 81-II,
Ltd. ...................... 5,536 6,953 13,921 13,232 16,033 11,975 6,862
Parker & Parsley 82-I,
Ltd. ...................... 11,388 12,155 24,158 23,886 25,898 27,831 23,257
Parker & Parsley 82-II,
Ltd. ...................... 10,933 12,604 24,922 27,554 27,854 22,031 18,498
Parker & Parsley 82-III,
Ltd. ...................... 8,607 10,544 20,646 20,801 19,540 12,402 11,409
Parker & Parsley 83-A,
Ltd. ...................... 29,541 33,151 66,679 69,238 67,612 52,495 46,838
Parker & Parsley 83-B,
Ltd. ...................... 33,837 41,940 81,814 89,446 93,695 56,204 70,252
Parker & Parsley 84-A,
Ltd. ...................... 38,301 43,066 85,485 85,868 88,702 57,564 68,163
Parker & Parsley 85-A,
Ltd. ...................... 11,722 14,037 27,458 31,246 27,808 21,052 21,614
Parker & Parsley 85-B,
Ltd. ...................... 9,856 10,065 20,809 21,410 24,803 16,032 14,832
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 85-A, Ltd. ..... 7,651 9,054 17,619 20,664 21,200 7,461 10,079
Parker & Parsley Selected 85
Private Investment,
Ltd. ...................... 7,950 7,674 15,698 14,598 15,439 12,602 11,058
Parker & Parsley 86-A,
Ltd. ...................... 13,299 15,422 31,785 33,226 31,472 20,166 26,019
Parker & Parsley 86-B,
Ltd. ...................... 25,551 30,997 62,337 63,132 70,399 43,243 41,035
Parker & Parsley 86-C,
Ltd. ...................... 30,072 33,640 66,329 64,894 74,674 54,393 45,739
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 86, Ltd. ....... 8,782 10,793 20,938 20,843 22,245 17,822 16,606
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv.,
Ltd. ...................... 5,843 6,912 13,096 13,578 14,371 10,345 11,375
Parker & Parsley 87-A,
Ltd. ...................... 43,647 51,722 97,824 101,441 107,375 77,315 84,978
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv.,
Ltd. ...................... 6,390 8,146 16,015 16,758 17,879 8,728 11,701
Parker & Parsley 87-B,
Ltd. ...................... 26,099 33,261 65,401 68,433 73,036 35,640 47,808
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. ..... 24,585 26,669 53,656 53,101 64,367 24,458 22,894
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. ..... 14,052 17,391 33,115 35,770 40,796 19,481 26,130
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 87, Ltd. ....... 18,141 16,906 35,242 40,495 42,801 25,756 23,896
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv.,
L.P........................ 7,026 7,158 14,604 17,052 16,899 14,063 10,700
GAS (MCF) TOTAL (BOE)(A)
--------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
FOR THE SIX
FOR THE YEAR ENDED MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------- ------------------- ---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 2001 2000 2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- --------- ------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Parker & Parsley 81-I,
Ltd. ...................... 25,901 28,708 24,638 8,489 9,092 18,293 19,755 18,043
Parker & Parsley 81-II,
Ltd. ...................... 15,864 19,167 22,439 7,532 8,097 16,565 16,427 19,773
Parker & Parsley 82-I,
Ltd. ...................... 45,981 48,380 48,971 16,027 16,031 31,822 31,949 34,060
Parker & Parsley 82-II,
Ltd. ...................... 35,900 42,858 41,862 14,605 15,687 30,905 34,697 34,831
Parker & Parsley 82-III,
Ltd. ...................... 21,480 23,061 17,680 10,674 12,446 24,226 24,645 22,487
Parker & Parsley 83-A,
Ltd. ...................... 94,612 109,716 95,156 38,290 40,957 82,448 87,524 83,471
Parker & Parsley 83-B,
Ltd. ...................... 132,106 157,842 147,495 43,204 53,649 103,832 115,753 118,278
Parker & Parsley 84-A,
Ltd. ...................... 138,617 154,235 145,870 47,895 54,427 108,588 111,574 113,014
Parker & Parsley 85-A,
Ltd. ...................... 41,549 55,226 43,021 15,231 17,639 34,383 40,450 34,978
Parker & Parsley 85-B,
Ltd. ...................... 30,909 33,467 41,501 12,528 12,537 25,961 26,988 31,720
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 85-A, Ltd. ..... 20,905 23,218 22,343 8,895 10,734 21,103 24,534 24,924
Parker & Parsley Selected 85
Private Investment,
Ltd. ...................... 22,987 27,627 25,328 10,050 9,517 19,529 19,203 19,660
Parker & Parsley 86-A,
Ltd. ...................... 56,549 62,354 49,805 16,660 19,759 41,210 43,618 39,773
Parker & Parsley 86-B,
Ltd. ...................... 79,859 86,726 97,715 32,758 37,836 75,647 77,586 86,685
Parker & Parsley 86-C,
Ltd. ...................... 95,610 105,081 129,149 39,138 41,263 82,264 82,408 96,199
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 86, Ltd. ....... 33,570 30,923 33,219 11,752 13,561 26,533 25,997 27,782
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv.,
Ltd. ...................... 20,355 24,503 24,025 7,567 8,808 16,489 17,662 18,375
Parker & Parsley 87-A,
Ltd. ...................... 152,075 183,099 179,494 56,533 65,885 123,170 131,958 137,291
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv.,
Ltd. ...................... 23,682 24,436 25,477 7,845 10,096 19,962 20,831 22,125
Parker & Parsley 87-B,
Ltd. ...................... 96,740 99,771 104,072 32,039 41,229 81,524 85,062 90,381
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. ..... 45,872 53,145 56,240 28,661 30,485 61,301 61,959 73,740
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. ..... 49,380 48,774 50,220 17,299 21,746 41,345 43,899 49,166
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 87, Ltd. ....... 48,307 52,874 58,036 22,434 20,889 43,293 49,307 52,474
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv.,
L.P........................ 21,399 27,417 25,367 9,370 8,941 18,171 21,622 21,127
A-18
OIL & NGL (BBLS) GAS (MCF)
----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
FOR THE SIX FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30,
----------------- --------------------------------- ---------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 2001 2000
------- ------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Parker & Parsley 88-A,
L.P. ...................... 23,970 24,407 49,808 58,141 57,635 47,966 36,489
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 7,743 9,309 18,572 16,986 17,610 8,437 10,843
Parker & Parsley 88-B,
L.P. ...................... 19,089 22,934 45,729 41,830 43,365 20,792 26,695
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 6,735 7,753 15,453 14,136 14,859 8,160 9,952
Parker & Parsley 88-C,
L.P. ...................... 4,792 5,520 11,023 10,071 10,596 5,811 7,086
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P. ..... 12,098 13,726 26,976 30,280 34,491 16,169 20,402
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 88, L.P. ....... 19,574 23,313 46,284 48,802 48,933 28,101 30,899
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 5,776 6,423 13,092 14,166 14,102 11,172 10,163
Parker & Parsley 89-A,
L.P. ...................... 17,189 19,094 38,923 42,129 41,931 33,232 30,228
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 12,925 16,104 30,959 32,585 35,481 23,283 21,901
Parker & Parsley 89-B,
L.P. ...................... 14,236 17,736 34,089 35,879 39,063 25,638 24,114
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 89, L.P. ....... 14,694 15,219 30,738 30,310 36,741 21,188 13,324
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 4,331 4,958 9,876 10,130 11,399 8,155 6,902
Parker & Parsley 90-A,
L.P. ...................... 12,493 14,303 28,519 29,248 32,915 23,539 19,897
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 23,763 26,562 53,388 53,864 58,543 35,369 33,016
Parker & Parsley 90-B,
L.P. ...................... 64,464 72,038 144,804 146,064 158,775 95,918 89,536
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 13,982 16,386 32,773 32,618 33,187 17,805 14,092
Parker & Parsley 90-C,
L.P. ...................... 22,479 26,332 52,686 52,433 53,358 28,625 22,664
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 90, L.P. ....... 22,587 26,680 52,913 46,335 49,468 29,299 24,989
Parker & Parsley 90
Spraberry Private Dev.,
L.P. ...................... 10,509 10,715 22,593 20,688 20,835 14,921 9,984
Parker & Parsley 91-A,
L.P. ...................... 24,949 32,881 64,129 64,820 70,623 52,227 47,283
Parker & Parsley 91-B,
L.P. ...................... 24,152 35,483 69,550 65,056 66,527 28,144 42,828
------- ------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total................ 787,707 915,172 1,816,404 1,858,207 1,969,272 1,245,735 1,237,363
======= ======= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
GAS (MCF) TOTAL (BOE)(A)
--------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
FOR THE SIX
FOR THE YEAR ENDED MONTHS ENDED FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------- ------------------- ---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 2001 2000 2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- --------- ------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Parker & Parsley 88-A,
L.P. ...................... 72,965 93,498 86,501 31,964 30,489 61,969 73,724 72,052
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 21,781 23,221 21,214 9,149 11,116 22,202 20,856 21,146
Parker & Parsley 88-B,
L.P. ...................... 53,620 57,190 52,254 22,554 27,383 54,666 51,362 52,074
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 19,618 21,119 19,764 8,095 9,412 18,723 17,656 18,153
Parker & Parsley 88-C,
L.P. ...................... 13,979 15,049 14,091 5,761 6,701 13,353 12,579 12,945
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P. ..... 37,939 44,467 51,099 14,793 17,126 33,299 37,691 43,008
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 88, L.P. ....... 59,532 66,701 61,718 24,258 28,463 56,206 59,919 59,219
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 20,057 20,484 21,106 7,638 8,117 16,435 17,580 17,620
Parker & Parsley 89-A,
L.P. ...................... 59,638 60,905 62,751 22,728 24,132 48,863 52,280 52,390
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 42,179 46,681 52,345 16,806 19,754 37,989 40,365 44,205
Parker & Parsley 89-B,
L.P. ...................... 46,454 51,400 57,643 18,509 21,755 41,831 44,446 48,670
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 89, L.P. ....... 30,037 32,985 44,624 18,225 17,440 35,744 35,808 44,178
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 13,365 14,989 16,309 5,690 6,108 12,104 12,628 14,117
Parker & Parsley 90-A,
L.P. ...................... 38,570 43,302 47,086 16,416 17,619 34,947 36,465 40,763
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 64,786 70,803 73,460 29,658 32,065 64,186 65,665 70,786
Parker & Parsley 90-B,
L.P. ...................... 175,696 192,016 199,215 80,450 86,961 174,087 178,067 191,978
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv.,
L.P. ...................... 30,423 29,399 30,348 16,950 18,735 37,844 37,518 38,245
Parker & Parsley 90-C,
L.P. ...................... 48,907 47,265 48,787 27,250 30,109 60,837 60,311 61,489
Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 90, L.P. ....... 49,484 47,331 54,218 27,470 30,845 61,160 54,224 58,504
Parker & Parsley 90
Spraberry Private Dev.,
L.P. ...................... 22,121 19,579 24,095 12,996 12,379 26,280 23,951 24,851
Parker & Parsley 91-A,
L.P. ...................... 94,315 100,615 108,617 33,654 40,762 79,848 81,589 88,726
Parker & Parsley 91-B,
L.P. ...................... 85,556 74,025 68,244 28,843 42,621 83,809 77,394 77,901
--------- --------- --------- ------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total................ 2,451,231 2,695,632 2,724,612 995,333 1,121,403 2,224,946 2,307,486 2,423,377
========= ========= ========= ======= ========= ========= ========= =========
---------------
(a) Gas production is converted to oil equivalents at the rate of six mcf per
barrel, representing the relative energy content of natural gas and oil.
A-19
TABLE 14
PRODUCTIVE WELLS AND DEVELOPED ACREAGE
AS OF JUNE 30, 2001
PRODUCTIVE OIL AND
GAS WELLS DEVELOPED ACRES
------------------- -----------------
GROSS(A) NET(B) GROSS(A) NET(B)
--------- ------- -------- ------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................................ 16 9.13 2,328 1,250
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ............................... 12 8.40 1,563 1,050
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................................ 17 16.19 1,702 1,557
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ............................... 16 15.38 1,882 1,489
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .............................. 13 11.63 2,013 1,381
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ................................ 42 37.59 5,154 3,602
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ................................ 41 40.66 5,227 4,190
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ................................ 38 37.55 4,929 4,019
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ................................ 21 17.05 2,083 1,315
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ................................ 17 13.05 2,536 1,215
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. ............. 11 7.78 1,204 658
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. ...... 12 9.23 1,282 738
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ................................ 26 21.86 1,689 1,108
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ................................ 43 35.66 2,709 1,694
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ................................ 53 44.36 4,432 2,786
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. ............... 14 12.37 1,685 1,131
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. .......................... 71 6.91 6,498 659
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ................................ 71 51.65 6,498 4,926
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. .......................... 47 8.07 4,465 796
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ................................ 47 32.98 4,465 3,251
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. ........... 84 38.05 10,576 3,615
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. ........... 34 20.29 4,302 1,609
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. ............... 24 19.65 1,685 1,130
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. .......................... 39 8.01 3,286 592
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ................................ 39 25.98 3,286 1,628
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. .......................... 40 7.47 2,766 956
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ................................ 40 18.39 2,766 412
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. .......................... 40 6.84 2,757 343
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ................................ 40 4.87 2,757 244
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P. ........... 22 17.73 1,689 1,193
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. ............... 22 19.18 1,873 1,211
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. .......................... 31 5.69 2,811 553
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ................................ 31 16.91 2,811 1,645
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. .......................... 33 13.72 2,992 1,150
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ................................ 33 15.12 2,992 1,267
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P. ............... 19 13.87 1,913 1,253
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. .......................... 25 4.56 2,045 395
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ................................ 25 13.17 2,045 1,141
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. .......................... 102 22.88 9,729 2,086
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ................................ 102 62.05 9,729 5,658
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. .......................... 42 13.68 1,021 316
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ................................ 42 21.99 1,021 509
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P. ............... 27 20.65 2,333 1,556
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev., L.P. ........... 12 9.00 1,017 658
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ................................ 47 24.71 4,389 1,891
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ................................ 29 21.97 1,922 1,301
----- ------ ------- ------
Total............................................. 1,652 903.93 150,857 73,127
===== ====== ======= ======
---------------
(a) A "gross well" or "gross acre" is a well or an acre in which a working
interest is owned. The number of gross wells or acres represents the sum of
the wells or acres in which a working interest is owned.
(b) A "net well" or "net acre" is deemed to exist when the sum of the
fractional working interests in gross wells or acres equals one. The number
of net wells or acres is the sum of the fractional working interests in
gross wells or acres.
A-20
TABLE 15
RECENT TRADES OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS(a)
PER $1,000 INVESTMENT
FOR THE SEVEN MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2001 AND
THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND 1999
PER $1,000 INVESTMENT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR THE SEVEN MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2001 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
---------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
SALES PRICE SALES PRICE
------------------ NUMBER NUMBER ----------------- NUMBER NUMBER
HIGH LOW OF SALES SOLD HIGH LOW OF SALES SOLD
------- ------- -------- ------ ------- ------- -------- ------
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ....... $ -- $ -- -- -- $ 47.75 $ 37.50 5 61
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ...... 110.00 75.00 3 30 89.00 45.00 6 60
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ....... 120.00 100.00 4 65 112.50 94.00 6 60
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ....... 137.00 85.00 3 25 135.00 96.11 5 105
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ....... 200.00 143.56 4 90 165.00 101.11 8 175
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ....... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ....... 145.00 145.00 1 10 135.00 100.00 4 35
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ....... 140.00 125.00 3 20 160.00 65.00 4 45
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ....... 165.00 165.00 1 5 160.00 97.00 8 120
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ....... 147.66 92.00 5 31 135.00 95.45 4 40
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ....... 163.75 145.00 6 177 163.75 78.00 12 128
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ....... 191.50 157.20 3 35 179.25 105.66 14 255
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. ............ 280.00 280.00 1 20 280.00 184.00 2 12
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. ............ 138.00 138.00 1 4 310.00 146.00 3 47
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ....... 210.00 186.00 3 35 205.00 135.00 6 43
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ....... -- -- -- -- 188.12 128.00 3 230
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ....... 250.00 250.00 2 90 175.00 138.20 4 17
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P. ............ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ....... 241.00 215.00 3 45 221.00 140.00 7 100
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ....... -- -- -- -- 215.00 215.00 1 5
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ....... 185.00 183.00 2 35 230.00 126.11 3 35
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ....... 260.00 211.12 8 85 211.12 100.00 19 275
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ....... 225.00 112.30 4 50 210.00 112.30 12 251
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ....... 320.00 275.00 2 20 259.00 212.00 2 22
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ....... 330.44 300.00 4 30 235.11 235.11 1 10
PER $1,000 INVESTMENT
-------------------------------------
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
-------------------------------------
SALES PRICE
----------------- NUMBER NUMBER
HIGH LOW OF SALES SOLD
------- ------- -------- ------
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ....... $ 15.00 $ 4.17 2 24
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ...... 30.83 10.50 3 41
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ....... 54.00 36.75 10 151
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ....... 63.11 43.00 2 35
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ....... 72.00 44.00 8 104
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ....... 61.00 10.00 5 50
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ....... 75.00 75.00 2 30
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ....... 55.00 10.00 2 40
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ....... 111.00 62.34 9 108
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ....... 80.00 45.00 5 32
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ....... 112.00 65.00 10 155
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ....... 101.67 10.00 12 205
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. ............ 175.00 112.00 4 79
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. ............ 170.00 128.00 3 30
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ....... 105.11 57.00 3 25
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ....... 111.00 62.00 4 50
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ....... 56.00 56.00 1 25
Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P. ............ 225.00 225.00 1 4
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ....... 138.00 86.00 5 70
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ....... 146.11 105.00 5 85
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ....... 92.00 84.33 2 25
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ....... 175.00 90.00 12 115
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ....... 136.33 60.51 8 125
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ....... 121.00 88.00 2 13
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ....... 135.00 135.00 1 10
---------------
(a) This table contains historical information about recent trades of
partnership interests on a per $1,000 investment as determined from "The
Partnership Spectrum." The price information represents the prices reported
to have been paid to the sellers net of commissions paid by buyers. This
information should not be relied upon as any indication of the price at
which the partnership interests may trade. There may have been other
secondary sale transactions in the partnership interests, although no
information regarding any such transactions is available to Pioneer USA.
Because the information regarding sale transactions in the partnership
interests in this table is provided without verification by Pioneer USA and
because the information provided does not reflect sufficient activity to
cause the prices shown to be representative of the market values of the
partnership interests, the information should not be relied upon as
indicative of the ability of limited partners to sell their partnership
interests in secondary sale transactions or as to the prices at which the
partnership interests may be sold.
A-21
TABLE 16
RESERVE VALUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO PIONEER USA, NONMANAGING
GENERAL PARTNERS AND LIMITED PARTNERS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2001
TOTAL RESERVE VALUE(A)
----------------------------------------------------------
NONMANAGING
GENERAL LIMITED
PIONEER USA(B) PARTNERS(C) PARTNERS(D) TOTAL
-------------- ----------- ------------ ------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................................ $ 242,920 $ 17,609 $ 652,136 $ 912,665
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ............................... 165,833 6,793 511,151 683,777
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................................ 419,236 14,382 859,821 1,293,439
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ............................... 439,725 13,485 1,175,037 1,628,247
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .............................. 312,876 10,249 785,095 1,108,220
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ................................ 968,805 37,688 2,582,800 3,589,293
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ................................ 1,312,532 50,316 3,429,109 4,791,957
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ................................ 1,324,574 56,580 3,648,163 5,029,317
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ................................ 37,920 -- 1,258,113 1,296,033
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ................................ 19,444 -- 1,111,813 1,131,257
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. ............. 47,329 -- 1,354,588 1,401,917
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. ...... 28,421 -- 1,028,644 1,057,065
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ................................ 23,635 -- 1,737,540 1,761,175
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ................................ 67,810 -- 3,837,419 3,905,229
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ................................ 41,159 -- 3,106,759 3,147,918
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. ............... 13,277 -- 1,314,449 1,327,726
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. .......................... 14,400 -- 744,066 758,466
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ................................ 90,315 -- 5,549,685 5,640,000
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. .......................... 11,952 -- 982,983 994,935
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ................................ 49,644 -- 4,013,628 4,063,272
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. ........... 34,029 -- 2,489,324 2,523,353
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. ........... 61,008 -- 2,292,983 2,353,991
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. ............... 26,380 -- 2,611,622 2,638,002
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P............................ 21,158 -- 896,741 917,899
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.................................. 72,749 -- 3,057,497 3,130,246
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P............................ 18,992 -- 1,210,615 1,229,607
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.................................. 61,751 -- 2,966,274 3,028,025
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P............................ 12,731 -- 973,954 986,685
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.................................. 8,464 -- 694,740 703,204
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P............. 32,226 -- 1,876,770 1,908,996
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P................. 34,783 -- 3,443,488 3,478,271
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P............................ 9,187 -- 909,542 918,729
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.................................. 61,463 -- 2,670,421 2,731,884
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P............................ 22,869 -- 1,717,590 1,740,459
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.................................. 38,779 -- 1,875,515 1,914,294
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P................. 31,264 -- 1,971,695 2,002,959
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P............................ 9,146 -- 566,974 576,120
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.................................. 52,176 -- 1,611,222 1,663,398
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P............................ 54,385 -- 3,210,575 3,264,960
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.................................. 111,242 -- 8,754,945 8,866,187
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P............................ 25,876 -- 1,829,876 1,855,752
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.................................. 36,420 -- 2,946,927 2,983,347
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P................. 52,185 -- 3,333,202 3,385,387
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Dev., L.P............. 16,361 -- 1,619,709 1,636,070
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.................................. 65,448 -- 4,665,509 4,730,957
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.................................. 54,570 -- 4,961,039 5,015,609
---------- -------- ------------ ------------
Total............................................... $6,657,449 $207,102 $104,841,748 $111,706,299
========== ======== ============ ============
---------------
(a) The reserve value is one of the components of the merger value for each
partnership and represents the present value of estimated future net
revenues from the partnership's estimated oil and gas reserves as of March
31, 2001. The present value was calculated using: (1) a five-year New York
Mercantile Exchange, or NYMEX, futures price for oil and gas as of March 31,
2001 with prices held constant after year five at the year five price, less
standard industry adjustments, (2) historical operating costs adjusted only
for those items affected by commodity prices, such as production taxes and
ad valorem taxes, and (3) a 10.0% discount rate. For 2001, the oil and gas
prices were based on the average NYMEX futures price for the nine-month
period beginning on April 1, 2001 and ending December 31, 2001.
(b) Represents Pioneer USA's partnership interests in each partnership as: (1)
the sole or managing general partner of the partnership; (2) a limited
partner of the partnership; and (3) the sole general partner of each
nonmanaging general partner. Pioneer USA will not receive any Pioneer Parent
common stock for its partnership interests in any participating partnership.
However, as a result of the merger of each participating partnership,
Pioneer USA will acquire 100% of the properties of the partnership including
properties attributable to its partnership interests in the partnerships.
(c) Represents four unaffiliated individuals' partnership interests as limited
partners of each nonmanaging general partner. Excludes Pioneer USA's
partnership interests as general partner of each nonmanaging general
partner.
(d) Represents the partnership interests of unaffiliated limited partners of
each partnership. Excludes Pioneer USA's partnership interests as a limited
partner of any partnership.
A-22
APPENDIX B
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
August 17, 2001
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400
Irving, Texas 75039
Attention Board of Directors
Gentlemen:
Subject: Summary Letter Including 46 Reports of
Review of Estimates Prepared by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
of Oil and Gas Reserves and
Associated Future Net Revenue to the
Interests of the Limited Partners
or the Converted Limited Partners
in Various Parker & Parsley Partnerships
Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Effective March 31, 2001
Williamson Project 1.8859
In accordance with your request, Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.
(Williamson) has prepared this summary letter for inclusion in the proxy
statement to be distributed to the limited partners of the referenced
Partnerships by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (Pioneer USA). This letter
includes the results from 46 review letters prepared for Pioneer USA to the
interests of the Limited Partners or the Converted Limited Partners in various
Parker & Parsley Partnerships managed by Pioneer USA effective March 31, 2001. A
listing of the 46 Williamson review letters is included as Exhibit I.
I. DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES
The estimated reserves presented in this summary letter are net proved
reserves, including proved developed producing, proved developed nonproducing,
and proved undeveloped reserves. In preparing these evaluations, no attempt has
been made to quantify the element of uncertainty associated with any category.
Reserves were assigned to each category as warranted.
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil,
natural gas, and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data
demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from
known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Prices and
costs include consideration of changes provided by contractual arrangements and
may include escalations based upon an estimate of future conditions.
A. Reservoirs are considered proved if economic producibility is
supported by either actual production or conclusive formation test. The
area of a reservoir considered proved includes:
1. that portion delineated by drilling and defined by gas-oil
and/or oil-water contacts, if any; and
2. the immediately adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which
can be reasonably judged as economically productive on the basis of
available geological and engineering data. In the absence of information
on fluid contacts, the lowest known structural occurrence of
hydrocarbons controls the lower proved limit of the reservoir.
B. Reserves which can be produced economically through application of
improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injection) are included in the
"proved" classification when successful testing by a pilot project, or the
operation of an installed program in the reservoir, provides support for
the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based.
B-1
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AUGUST 17, 2001
PAGE 2
C. Estimates of proved reserves do not include the following:
1. oil that may become available from known reservoirs but is
classified separately as "indicated additional reserves";
2. crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, the recovery of
which is subject to reasonable doubt because of uncertainty as to
geology, reservoir characteristics, or economic factors;
3. crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may occur
in undrilled prospects; and
4. crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may be
recovered from oil shales, coal, gilsonite, and other such sources.
Proved Developed Oil and Gas Reserves(1)
Proved developed oil and gas reserves are reserves that can be expected to
be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating
methods. Additional oil and gas expected to be obtained through the application
of fluid injection or other improved recovery techniques for supplementing the
natural forces and mechanisms of primary recovery should be included as "proved
developed reserves" only after testing by a pilot project or after the operation
of an installed program has confirmed through production response that increased
recovery will be achieved.
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are expected to
be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a
relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled
acreage shall be limited to those drilling units offsetting productive units
that are reasonably certain of production when drilled. Proved reserves for
other undrilled units can be claimed only where it can be demonstrated with
certainty that there is continuity of production from the existing productive
formation. Under no circumstances should estimates, for proved undeveloped
reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid
injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such
techniques have been proved effective by actual tests in the area and in the
same reservoir.
II. DISCUSSION OF THE REVIEW
In performing the review, Williamson conducted an evaluation of the methods
and procedures utilized by Pioneer USA in the preparation of the estimates of
reserves and associated future net revenue and performed tests and procedures
considered necessary to render the opinions set forth herein.
Williamson evaluated the properties in 46 Parker & Parsley Partnerships as
of December 31, 2000 and the results of that evaluation were transmitted in 46
individual reports (the SEC Reports) dated February 20, 2001. Williamson also
prepared a Summary Letter Report including the SEC Reports for inclusion in a
Registration Statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act of 1933 to be filed
with the SEC. Pioneer USA prepared reports on each partnership using the SEC
Reports as the bases. Pioneer USA rolled forward the Williamson oil and gas
projections from the SEC Reports to March 31, 2001, applied different pricing,
added three proved undeveloped locations, and made ownership interest changes on
some wells. (Most of the changes were due to payout reversions that had occurred
prior to March 31, 2001.) Pioneer USA represented that no Williamson reserves
projections were altered and no changes were made to the lease operating
expenses, production taxes, or ownership interests (except as noted above). The
Pioneer USA evaluations resulted in oil, natural gas liquids (NGL), and gas
combined total net reserves of 13,882.872 MBBL, 7,008.607 MBBL, and 28,430.649
MMCF with a combined total future net revenue discounted at 10.0 percent (DFNR)
of M$104,150.210.
---------------
(1) Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. separates proved developed reserves
into proved developed producing and proved developed nonproducing reserves.
This is to identify proved developed producing reserves as those to be
recovered from actively producing wells; proved developed nonproducing
reserves as those to be recovered from wells or intervals within wells,
which are completed but shut in waiting on equipment or pipeline
connections, or wells where a relatively minor expenditure is required for
recompletion to another zone.
B-2
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AUGUST 17, 2001
PAGE 3
Pioneer USA updated the production generally through April 2001 and transmitted
these March 31, 2001 roll-forward reports in the form of an Aries database to
Williamson for review. Williamson has reviewed the Pioneer USA database and has
determined that no changes have been made to the database except for the
effective date; oil, gas, and NGL prices; the addition of three proved
undeveloped locations; and the ownership interest changes noted above. In
reviewing the roll forward oil and gas reserves projections with the added six
months of production for the months of November 2000 through April 2001,
Williamson recommended and made changes to the oil and/or gas projections of
certain wells as required. These reserves changes resulted in a change to the
Pioneer USA combined total DFNR of M$1,870.163 or 1.8 percent of the combined
total DFNR. The change to the Pioneer USA DFNR for the individual partnerships
ranged from 16.4 percent to a negative 11.1 percent.
Based on our review, it is the opinion of Williamson that the estimates of
the reviewed oil and gas reserves and associated future net revenue prepared by
Pioneer USA effective March 31, 2001 are reasonable in the aggregate and were
prepared in accordance with generally accepted petroleum engineering and
evaluation principles as set forth in "Standards Pertaining to the Estimating
and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information" promulgated by the Society of
Petroleum Engineers.
Exhibits II, III, and IV detail the Pioneer USA oil, NGL, and gas net
reserves and associated future net revenue, undiscounted and discounted for each
Partnership for the Total Proved, Total Proved Developed, and Total Proved
Undeveloped, respectively, from the Williamson review letters.
III. CONSENT AND DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENT STATUS
We understand that the estimates prepared by Pioneer USA and reviewed by
Williamson are to be included in the proxy statement/prospectus filed by you
with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933. We understand further that the
estimates may be used by you to establish merger values for the Partnerships.
With this understanding in mind, it is our opinion that the estimates of
reserves and associated future net revenue prepared by Pioneer USA and reviewed
by us are reasonable in the aggregate and were prepared in accordance with
generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation principles in estimating
the proved oil and gas reserves and in computing the future net revenue derived
from such reserves for each property attributable to the interests held by the
Partnerships.
Williamson is an independent consulting firm and does not own any interests
in the oil and gas properties covered by this summary letter. No employee,
officer, or director of Williamson is an employee, officer, or director of
Pioneer USA or any of the subject Partnerships. Neither the employment of nor
the compensation received by Williamson is contingent upon the values assigned
to the properties covered by this summary letter.
Yours very truly,
WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
/s/ JOHN D. SAVAGE
------------------------------------------
John D. Savage, P.E.
Senior Vice President
JDS/chk
Enclosures
B-3
EXHIBIT I
SUMMARY LETTER INCLUDING 46 REPORTS OF
REVIEW OF ESTIMATES PREPARED BY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES AND
ASSOCIATED FUTURE NET REVENUE
TO THE INTERESTS OF THE LIMITED PARTNERS
OR THE CONVERTED LIMITED PARTNERS
IN VARIOUS PARKER & PARSLEY PARTNERSHIPS
MANAGED BY PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
EFFECTIVE MARCH 31, 2001
WILLIAMSON PROJECT 1.8859
LIST OF WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC. REVIEW LETTERS
EFFECTIVE MARCH 31, 2001
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
B-4
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.
Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001
Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Converted Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 87-A Converted, Ltd. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Converted Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 87-B Converted, Ltd. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Converted Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-A Converted, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Converted Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-B Converted, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
B-5
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Converted Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-C Converted, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Converted Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 89-A Converted, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Converted Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 89-B Converted, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Converted Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-A Converted, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Converted Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-B Converted, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Converted Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-C Converted, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-C L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project
1.8859"
B-6
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P.
Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001
Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
"Review of Estimates Prepared by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. of Oil
and Gas Reserves and Associated Future Net Revenue to the Interests of the
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. Effective March 31, 2001 Williamson Project 1.8859"
B-7
EXHIBIT II
SUMMARY LETTER INCLUDING 46 REPORTS OF
REVIEW OF ESTIMATES PREPARED BY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES AND
ASSOCIATED FUTURE NET REVENUE
TO THE INTERESTS OF THE LIMITED PARTNERS
OR THE CONVERTED LIMITED PARTNERS
IN VARIOUS PARKER & PARSLEY PARTNERSHIPS
MANAGED BY PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
EFFECTIVE MARCH 31, 2001
WILLIAMSON PROJECT 1.8859
NET RESERVES AND FUTURE NET REVENUE
FROM REVIEW LETTERS PREPARED BY WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
EFFECTIVE MARCH 31, 2001
TOTAL PROVED
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NET RESERVES TO FUTURE NET REVENUE, M$
THE EVALUATED INTERESTS ----------------------------
--------------------------------------- DISCOUNTED
OIL/CONDENSATE LIQUID GAS PER ANNUM AT
PIONEER FUNDS (Mbbl) (Mbbl) (MMcf) UNDISCOUNTED 10.00 PERCENT
------------- -------------- --------- ---------- ------------ -------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................. 82.264 48.823 259.480 1,168.899 684.499
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ................ 66.975 50.694 168.235 782.647 512.833
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................. 142.135 54.037 429.393 1,407.714 970.079
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ................ 163.217 76.783 361.269 2,101.905 1,221.185
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. ............... 131.569 55.082 181.031 1,334.954 831.165
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ................. 382.712 225.243 908.023 4,375.619 2,691.969
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ................. 510.986 286.392 1,275.147 5,832.096 3,593.967
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ................. 497.742 336.241 1,399.838 6,282.321 3,771.987
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ................. 175.139 97.215 377.073 2,016.968 1,283.072
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ................. 149.887 74.437 330.848 1,864.301 1,119.945
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A,
Ltd. ...................................... 188.458 81.166 294.019 2,623.316 1,387.898
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private
Investment, Ltd. .......................... 120.690 85.403 341.876 1,860.766 1,046.495
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ................. 198.546 153.319 665.073 2,928.655 1,743.564
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ................. 504.170 254.744 1,007.115 6,660.474 3,866.176
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ................. 423.341 250.863 957.303 4,853.152 3,116.439
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86,
Ltd. ...................................... 165.771 82.994 442.678 2,210.650 1,314.449
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. ........... 93.912 52.654 224.443 1,286.337 750.882
Parker & Parsley 87-A , Ltd. ................ 693.991 388.276 1,654.968 9,514.063 5,583.600
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. ........... 129.176 72.879 299.274 1,764.667 984.985
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ................. 527.576 297.649 1,222.273 7,206.843 4,022.639
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A,
Ltd. ...................................... 426.729 120.298 543.992 4,255.595 2,498.119
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B,
Ltd. ...................................... 285.023 156.821 715.733 4,292.846 2,330.451
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87,
Ltd. ...................................... 329.654 162.827 668.737 4,520.573 2,611.622
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. ........... 116.016 65.640 253.729 1,588.020 908.720
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ................. 395.642 223.849 865.274 5,415.513 3,098.944
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. ........... 158.995 70.283 290.380 2,184.678 1,217.311
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ................. 391.541 173.080 715.088 5,379.979 2,997.745
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. ........... 123.832 61.040 251.777 1,736.724 976.818
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ................. 88.255 43.503 179.440 1,237.753 696.172
B-8
TOTAL PROVED
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NET RESERVES TO FUTURE NET REVENUE, M$
THE EVALUATED INTERESTS ----------------------------
--------------------------------------- DISCOUNTED
OIL/CONDENSATE LIQUID GAS PER ANNUM AT
PIONEER FUNDS (Mbbl) (Mbbl) (MMcf) UNDISCOUNTED 10.00 PERCENT
------------- -------------- --------- ---------- ------------ -------------
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A,
L.P. ...................................... 238.804 125.771 464.564 3,419.956 1,889.906
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88,
L.P. ...................................... 445.262 216.375 780.792 6,679.722 3,443.488
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. ........... 114.139 60.273 282.272 1,675.614 909.543
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ................. 339.398 179.226 839.349 4,982.510 2,704.565
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. ........... 216.989 128.163 481.258 2,973.068 1,723.053
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ................. 238.716 141.033 529.613 3,267.544 1,895.151
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89,
L.P. ...................................... 277.797 114.659 407.551 3,641.708 1,982.930
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. ........... 71.070 41.373 158.781 976.631 570.359
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ................. 205.195 119.453 458.440 2,819.768 1,646.764
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. ........... 423.611 205.022 800.528 5,584.044 3,232.310
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ................. 1,152.236 556.331 2,171.905 15,178.700 8,777.527
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. ........... 262.671 111.064 373.123 3,110.983 1,837.195
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ................. 422.275 178.549 599.841 5,001.285 2,953.514
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90,
L.P. ...................................... 439.460 183.432 629.750 6,034.439 3,351.532
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private
Development, L.P. ......................... 283.243 90.081 333.986 3,245.033 1,619.709
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ................. 575.176 261.699 1,200.498 9,122.714 4,683.646
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ................. 652.384 282.264 1,102.958 9,313.127 4,965.453
---------- --------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Total All Partnerships....................... 14,022.368 7,097.003 28,898.717 185,714.874 106,020.373
B-9
EXHIBIT III
SUMMARY LETTER INCLUDING 46 REPORTS OF
REVIEW OF ESTIMATES PREPARED BY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES AND
ASSOCIATED FUTURE NET REVENUE
TO THE INTERESTS OF THE LIMITED PARTNERS
OR THE CONVERTED LIMITED PARTNERS
IN VARIOUS PARKER & PARSLEY PARTNERSHIPS
MANAGED BY PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
EFFECTIVE MARCH 31, 2001
WILLIAMSON PROJECT 1.8859
NET RESERVES AND FUTURE NET REVENUE
FROM REVIEW LETTERS PREPARED BY
WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
EFFECTIVE MARCH 31, 2001
TOTAL PROVED DEVELOPED*
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NET RESERVES TO FUTURE NET REVENUE, M$
THE EVALUATED INTERESTS ----------------------------
--------------------------------------- DISCOUNTED
OIL/CONDENSATE LIQUID GAS PER ANNUM AT
(Mbbl) (Mbbl) (MMcf) UNDISCOUNTED 10.00 PERCENT
-------------- --------- ---------- ------------ -------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ...................... 82.264 48.823 259.480 1,168.899 684.499
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ..................... 66.975 50.694 168.235 782.647 512.833
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ...................... 142.135 54.037 429.393 1,407.714 970.079
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ..................... 163.217 76.783 361.269 2,101.905 1,221.185
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .................... 131.569 55.082 181.031 1,334.954 831.165
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ...................... 382.712 225.243 908.023 4,375.619 2,691.969
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ...................... 510.986 286.392 1,275.147 5,832.096 3,593.967
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ...................... 497.742 336.241 1,399.838 6,282.321 3,771.987
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ...................... 175.139 97.215 377.073 2,016.968 1,283.072
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ...................... 149.887 74.437 330.848 1,864.301 1,119.945
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. ... 188.458 81.166 294.019 2,623.316 1,387.898
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment,
Ltd. ........................................... 120.690 85.403 341.876 1,860.766 1,046.495
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ...................... 198.546 153.319 665.073 2,928.655 1,743.564
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ...................... 504.170 254.744 1,007.115 6,660.474 3,866.176
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ...................... 423.341 250.863 957.303 4,853.152 3,116.439
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. ..... 165.771 82.994 442.678 2,210.650 1,314.449
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. ................ 93.912 52.654 224.443 1,286.337 750.882
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ...................... 693.991 388.276 1,654.968 9,514.063 5,583.600
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. ................ 129.176 72.879 299.274 1,764.667 984.985
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ...................... 527.576 297.649 1,222.273 7,206.843 4,022.639
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A,
Ltd. ........................................... 426.729 120.298 543.992 4,255.595 2,498.119
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B,
Ltd. ........................................... 285.023 156.821 715.733 4,292.846 2,330.451
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. ..... 329.654 162.827 668.737 4,520.573 2,611.622
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. ................ 116.016 65.640 253.729 1,588.020 908.720
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ...................... 395.642 223.849 865.274 5,415.513 3,098.944
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. ................ 158.995 70.283 290.380 2,184.678 1,217.311
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ...................... 391.541 173.080 715.088 5,379.979 2,997.745
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. ................ 123.832 61.040 251.777 1,736.724 976.818
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ...................... 88.255 43.503 179.440 1,237.753 696.172
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A,
L.P. ........................................... 238.804 125.771 464.564 3,419.956 1,889.906
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. ..... 445.262 216.375 780.792 6,679.722 3,443.488
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. ................ 113.312 54.143 239.845 1,586.078 882.170
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ...................... 336.937 160.997 713.189 4,716.271 2,623.171
B-10
TOTAL PROVED DEVELOPED*
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NET RESERVES TO FUTURE NET REVENUE, M$
THE EVALUATED INTERESTS ----------------------------
--------------------------------------- DISCOUNTED
OIL/CONDENSATE LIQUID GAS PER ANNUM AT
(Mbbl) (Mbbl) (MMcf) UNDISCOUNTED 10.00 PERCENT
-------------- --------- ---------- ------------ -------------
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. ................ 216.989 128.163 481.258 2,973.068 1,723.053
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ...................... 238.716 141.033 529.613 3,267.544 1,895.151
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P. ..... 277.797 114.659 407.551 3,641.708 1,982.930
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. ................ 70.688 38.547 139.220 931.124 555.580
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ...................... 204.093 111.295 401.961 2,688.377 1,604.091
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. ................ 423.611 205.022 800.528 5,584.044 3,232.310
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ...................... 1,152.236 556.331 2,171.905 15,178.700 8,777.527
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. ................ 262.671 111.064 373.123 3,110.983 1,837.195
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ...................... 422.275 178.549 599.841 5,001.285 2,953.514
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P. ..... 439.460 183.432 629.750 6,034.439 3,351.532
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development,
L.P. ........................................... 283.243 90.081 333.986 3,245.033 1,619.709
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ...................... 575.176 261.699 1,200.498 9,122.714 4,683.646
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ...................... 652.384 282.264 1,102.958 9,313.127 4,965.453
---------- --------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Total All Partnerships............................ 14,017.596 7,061.660 28,654.090 185,182.201 105,854.154
---------------
* Proved developed includes proved developed producing and proved developed
nonproducing; these funds do not include any value for the proved developed
nonproducing category
B-11
EXHIBIT IV
SUMMARY LETTER INCLUDING 46 REPORTS OF
REVIEW OF ESTIMATES PREPARED BY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES AND
ASSOCIATED FUTURE NET REVENUE
TO THE INTERESTS OF THE LIMITED PARTNERS
OR THE CONVERTED LIMITED PARTNERS
IN VARIOUS PARKER & PARSLEY PARTNERSHIPS
MANAGED BY PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
EFFECTIVE MARCH 31, 2001
WILLIAMSON PROJECT 1.8859
NET RESERVES AND FUTURE NET REVENUE FROM
REVIEW LETTERS PREPARED BY WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
EFFECTIVE MARCH 31, 2001
TOTAL PROVED UNDEVELOPED
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FUTURE NET REVENUE, M$
NET RESERVES TO THE EVALUATED INTERESTS -----------------------------
--------------------------------------- DISCOUNTED PER
OIL/CONDENSATE LIQUID GAS ANNUM AT
(MBBL) (MBBL) (MMCF) UNDISCOUNTED 10.00 PERCENT
---------------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd............................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd........... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd............. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd........................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 87-A , Ltd............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd........................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd......... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd......... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd............. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P........................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P........................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P........................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
B-12
TOTAL PROVED UNDEVELOPED
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FUTURE NET REVENUE, M$
NET RESERVES TO THE EVALUATED INTERESTS -----------------------------
--------------------------------------- DISCOUNTED PER
OIL/CONDENSATE LIQUID GAS ANNUM AT
(MBBL) (MBBL) (MMCF) UNDISCOUNTED 10.00 PERCENT
---------------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P......... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P............. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P........................ 0.828 6.130 42.428 89.536 27.373
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.............................. 2.461 18.229 126.160 266.239 81.394
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P........................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P............. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P........................ 0.382 2.825 19.561 45.508 14.780
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.............................. 1.102 8.158 56.479 131.392 42.672
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P........................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P........................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P............. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development,
L.P................................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total All Partnerships.......................... 4.773 35.342 244.628 532.675 166.219
B-13
APPENDIX C
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY RESERVE REPORT OF
WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
FOR THE PARTNERSHIPS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2000
August 20, 2001
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400
Irving, Texas 75039
Attention Board of Directors
Gentlemen:
Subject: Revised Letter Report Including 46 Reports Prepared
by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.
for Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
to the Interests of the Limited Partners
or the Converted Limited Partners
in Various Parker & Parsley Partnerships
Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Effective December 31, 2000
for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission
Williamson Project 0.8839
In accordance with your request, Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.
(Williamson) has prepared this revised summary letter for inclusion in the proxy
statement to be distributed to the limited partners of the referenced
partnerships by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (Pioneer USA). This letter
includes 46 Williamson reports prepared for Pioneer USA to the interests of the
limited partners or the converted limited partners in various Parker & Parsley
partnerships managed by Pioneer USA effective December 31, 2000 for disclosure
to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). A listing of the 46 Williamson
reports is included as Exhibit I. This letter report has been revised to include
updated wording in the definitions of SEC reserves. No other changes have been
made to this document.
I. ESTIMATED RESERVES AND ESTIMATED FUTURE NET REVENUES
The total Williamson estimated net proved reserves that are attributable to
the evaluated interests of the 46 partnership reports are shown in Exhibit II
and were based on economic parameters and operating condition considered
applicable as of December 31, 2000 and may be used in disclosure to the SEC.
The present values of the estimated future net revenues from proved
reserves were calculated using a discount rate of 10.00 percent per annum and
were computed in accordance with the financial reporting requirements of the SEC
and are presented in Exhibit II.
At the request of Pioneer USA, Williamson used the Landmark graphics and
reserves and economics evaluation software, Aries, to prepare this summary
report. In evaluations of these properties prior to December 31, 1991,
Williamson utilized its proprietary software programs. No comparative tests have
been performed to determine the difference in evaluation results of either
reserves or revenue quantities that may occur solely as a result of the
differences in the programs nor has Williamson performed tests to determine the
accuracy of Aries. However, in accordance with the request made by Pioneer USA
and the general acceptance of Aries by the oil and gas industry, Williamson has
used Aries to prepare this report.
C-1
II. DEFINITIONS OF SEC RESERVES(1)
The estimated reserves presented in this summary letter are net proved
reserves, including proved developed producing, proved developed nonproducing,
and proved undeveloped reserves, and were computed in accordance with the
financial reporting requirements of the SEC. In preparing these evaluations, no
attempt has been made to quantify the element of uncertainty associated with any
category. Reserves were assigned to each category as warranted. The definitions
of oil and gas reserves pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act are:
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil,
natural gas, and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data
demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from
known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices
and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of
changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on
escalations based upon future conditions.
A. Reservoirs are considered proved if economic producibility is
supported by either actual production or conclusive formation test. The
area of a reservoir considered proved includes:
1. that portion delineated by drilling and defined by gas-oil
and/or oil-water contacts, if any; and
2. the immediately adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which
can be reasonably judged as economically productive on the basis of
available geological and engineering data. In the absence of
information on fluid contacts, the lowest known structural occurrence
of hydrocarbons controls the lower proved limit of the reservoir.
B. Reserves which can be produced economically through application of
improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injection) are included in the
"proved" classification when successful testing by a pilot project, or the
operation of an installed program in the reservoir, provides support for
the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based.
C. Estimates of proved reserves do not include the following:
1. oil that may become available from known reservoirs but is
classified separately as "indicated additional reserves";
2. crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, the recovery
of which is subject to reasonable doubt because of uncertainty as to
geology, reservoir characteristics, or economic factors;
3. crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may
occur in undrilled prospects; and
4. crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may be
recovered from oil shales, coal, gilsonite, and other such sources.
Proved Developed Oil and Gas Reserves(2)
Proved developed oil and gas reserves are reserves that can be expected to
be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating
methods. Additional oil and gas expected to be obtained through the application
of fluid injection or other improved recovery techniques for supplementing the
natural forces and mechanisms of primary recovery should be included as "proved
developed reserves" only after testing by a pilot project or after the operation
of an installed program has confirmed through production response that increased
recovery will be achieved.
---------------
(1) For evaluations prepared for disclosure to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, see United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Regulation
S-X, Article 4 -- Rules of General Application, Reg. 210.4-10.
(2) Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. separates proved developed reserves
into proved developed producing and proved developed nonproducing reserves.
This is to identify proved developed producing reserves as those to be
recovered from actively producing wells; proved developed nonproducing
reserves as those to be recovered from wells or intervals within wells,
which are completed but shut in waiting on equipment or pipeline
connections, or wells where a relatively minor expenditure is required for
recompletion to another zone.
C-2
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are expected to
be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a
relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled
acreage shall be limited to those drilling units offsetting productive units
that are reasonably certain of production when drilled. Proved reserves for
other undrilled units can be claimed only where it can be demonstrated with
certainty that there is continuity of production from the existing productive
formation. Under no circumstances should estimates for proved undeveloped
reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid
injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such
techniques have been proved effective by actual tests in the area and in the
same reservoir.
III. DISCUSSION OF SEC RESERVES
The properties evaluated in this report are located in the states of
Oklahoma and Texas with the majority of the value in the Spraberry (Trend Area)
field, Texas.
The individual projections of lease reserves and economics prepared to
produce this summary report include data that describe the production forecasts
and associated evaluation parameters such as interests, taxes, product prices,
operating costs, investments, salvage values, abandonment costs, and net profit
interests.
Net income to the evaluated interests is the future net revenue after
consideration of royalty revenue payable to others, taxes, operating expenses,
investments, salvage values, abandonment costs, and net profit interests, as
applicable. The future net revenue is before federal income tax and excludes
consideration of any encumbrances against the properties if such exist.
The future net revenue values presented in this report were based on
projections of oil and gas production. It was assumed there would be no
significant delay between the date of oil and gas production and the receipt of
the associated revenue for this production. No opinion is expressed by
Williamson in this report as to a fair market value of the evaluated properties.
Unless specifically identified and documented by Pioneer USA as having
curtailment problems, gas production trends have been assumed to be a function
of well productivity and not of market conditions. The effect of "take or pay"
clauses in gas contracts was not considered.
Oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) reserves are expressed in thousands of
United States (U.S.) barrels (MBBL) of 42 U.S. gallons. Gas volumes are
expressed in millions of cubic feet (MMCF) at 60 degrees Fahrenheit and at the
legal pressure base that prevails in the state which the reserves are located.
No adjustment of the individual gas volumes to a common pressure base has been
made.
This report includes only those costs and revenues which are considered by
Pioneer USA to be directly attributable to individual leases and areas. There
could exist other revenues, overhead costs, or other costs associated with
Pioneer USA or the Limited Partners/Converted Limited Partners which are not
included in this report. Such additional costs and revenues are outside the
scope of this report. This report is not a financial statement for Pioneer USA
or the Limited Partners/Converted Limited Partners and should not be used as the
sole basis for any transaction concerning Pioneer USA, the Limited
Partners/Converted Limited Partners, or the evaluated properties.
The reserves projections in this report are based on the use of the
available data and accepted industry engineering methods. Future changes in any
operational or economic parameters or production characteristics of the
evaluated properties could increase or decrease their reserves. Unforeseen
changes in market demand or allowables set by various regulatory agencies could
also cause actual production rates to vary from those projected. Williamson
reserves the right to alter any of the reserves projections and the associated
economics included in this evaluation in any future evaluations based on
additional data that may be acquired.
All data utilized in the preparation of this report with respect to
interests, reversionary status, oil and gas prices, gas categories, gas contract
terms, operating expenses, investments, salvage values, abandonment costs, net
profit interests, well information, and current operating conditions, as
applicable, were provided by Pioneer USA. Production data provided by Pioneer
USA were utilized. The production data was generally through October 2000. All
data have been reviewed for reasonableness and, unless obvious errors were
detected, have been accepted as correct. It should be emphasized that revisions
to the projections of reserves and economics included in this report may be
required if the provided data are revised for any reason. No inspection of the
properties was made as this was not considered within the scope of this
C-3
evaluation. No investigation was made of any environmental liabilities that
might apply to the evaluated properties, and no costs are included for any
possible related expenses.
Since sufficient production history and other data were available, the
estimates of reserves contained in this report were determined by extrapolation
of historical production trends and in accordance with the Definitions of SEC
Reserves included in this summary letter report.
Prices for oil sold as of December 31, 2000 were provided by Pioneer USA to
be used at the effective date. These prices include adjustments for API gravity,
transportation, and any bonus paid. These adjustments were made by Pioneer USA.
After the effective date, prices were held constant for the life of the
properties. No attempt has been made to account for oil price fluctuations which
have occurred in the market subsequent to the effective date of this report.
Prices for gas sold as of December 31, 2000 were provided by Pioneer USA to
be used at the effective date. These prices include adjustments for British
thermal unit content, shrinkage due to NGL removal, transportation and handling
charges, and any other known differences between sales and produced volumes.
These adjustments were made by Pioneer USA. After the effective date, prices
were held constant for the life of the properties unless Pioneer USA indicated
that changes were provided for by contract. All gas prices were applied to
projected wellhead volumes.
Prices for NGL sold as of December 31, 2000 were provided by Pioneer USA to
be used at the effective date. NGL reserves were projected as a separate stream
using a constant ratio (barrels of NGL/thousand cubic feet of gas) based on
historical yields. After the effective date, prices were held constant for the
life of the properties. No attempt has been made to account for price
fluctuations which have occurred in the market subsequent to the effective date
of this report.
It should be emphasized that with the current economic uncertainties,
fluctuation in market conditions could significantly change the economics of the
properties included in this report.
Operating expenses were provided by Pioneer USA and represented, when
possible, the latest available 12-month average of all recurring expenses which
are billable to the working interest owners. These expenses included, but were
not limited to, all direct operating expenses, field overhead costs, and any ad
valorem taxes not deducted separately. Expenses for workovers, well
stimulations, and other maintenance were not included in the operating expenses
unless such work was expected on a recurring basis. Judgments for the exclusion
of the nonrecurring expenses were made by Pioneer USA. Operating costs were held
constant for the life of the properties.
State production and county ad valorem taxes have been deducted at the
published rates as provided by Pioneer USA. A 7.5 percent severance tax
exemption was applied until September 2001 for qualifying wells.
IV. CONSENT AND DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENT STATUS
We understand that our estimates are to be included in a Registration
Statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act of 1933 to be filed by you with
the SEC and in the proxy statement/prospectus included therein. We understand
further that the estimates may be used by you to establish merger values for the
Partnerships. With this understanding in mind, we have consistently applied the
generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation principles in estimating
the proved oil and gas reserves and in computing the future net revenues derived
from such reserves for each property attributable to the interests held by the
Partnerships.
Based on information supplied by Pioneer USA, neither capital costs nor
salvage values were included in the projections of reserves and economics in
this report.
C-4
Williamson is an independent consulting firm and does not own any interests
in the oil and gas properties covered by this report. No employee, officer, or
director of Williamson is an employee, officer, or director of Pioneer USA or
any of the subject partnerships. Neither the employment of nor the compensation
received by Williamson is contingent upon the values assigned to the properties
covered by this report.
Yours very truly,
WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
/s/ JOHN D. SAVAGE, P.E.
--------------------------------------------------
John D. Savage, P.E.
Senior Vice President
JDS/chk
Enclosures
C-5
EXHIBIT I
LETTER REPORT INCLUDING 46 REPORTS PREPARED
BY WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
FOR PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
TO THE INTERESTS OF LIMITED PARTNERS
OR THE CONVERTED LIMITED PARTNERS
IN VARIOUS PARKER & PARSLEY PARTNERSHIPS
MANAGED BY PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 2000
FOR DISCLOSURE TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WILLIAMSON PROJECT 0.8839
LIST OF WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC. REPORTS
EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 2000
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
C-6
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure
to the Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries
Software Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Converted
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 87-A Converted, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Converted
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 87-B Converted, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Converted
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-A Converted, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Converted
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-B Converted, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
C-7
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Converted
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-C Converted, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Converted
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 89-A Converted, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Converted
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 89-B Converted, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Converted
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-A Converted, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Converted
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-B Converted, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Converted
Limited Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-C Converted, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P. Managed by Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the
Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software
Williamson Project 0.8839"
C-8
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P. Managed by
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure
to the Securities and Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries
Software Williamson Project 0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
"Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of the Limited
Partners in Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. Managed by Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc. Effective December 31, 2000 for Disclosure to the Securities and
Exchange Commission Summary Report Utilizing Aries Software Williamson Project
0.8839"
C-9
EXHIBIT II
LETTER REPORT INCLUDING 46 REPORTS PREPARED
BY WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
FOR PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
TO THE INTERESTS OF LIMITED PARTNERS
OR THE CONVERTED LIMITED PARTNERS
IN VARIOUS PARKER & PARSLEY PARTNERSHIPS
MANAGED BY PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 2000
FOR DISCLOSURE TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WILLIAMSON PROJECT 0.8839
NET RESERVES AND FUTURE NET REVENUE
FROM REPORTS PREPARED BY WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 2000
TOTAL PROVED DEVELOPED PRODUCING
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NET RESERVES TO FUTURE NET REVENUE, M$
THE EVALUATED INTERESTS ----------------------------
--------------------------------------- DISCOUNTED
OIL/CONDENSATE LIQUID GAS PER ANNUM AT
PIONEER FUNDS (Mbbl) (Mbbl) (MMcf) UNDISCOUNTED 10.00 PERCENT
------------- -------------- --------- ---------- ------------ -------------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ...................... 99.997 58.388 320.081 2,810.911 1,436.523
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ..................... 84.731 67.440 222.749 1,977.257 1,062.283
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ...................... 194.780 73.613 603.859 4,656.049 2,419.619
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ..................... 211.725 94.426 467.740 4,879.008 2,416.761
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .................... 164.851 68.468 223.717 2,916.207 1,539.389
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ...................... 497.915 281.533 1,156.089 11,168.739 5,649.205
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ...................... 608.901 345.775 1,553.450 14,112.492 7,165.928
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ...................... 608.956 403.376 1,678.388 15,623.823 7,676.646
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ...................... 243.615 134.904 512.744 5,195.717 2,783.387
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ...................... 201.444 99.966 455.062 4,490.151 2,308.454
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. ... 228.363 96.999 353.440 5,194.664 2,383.495
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment,
Ltd. ........................................... 130.193 99.486 381.116 3,650.520 1,810.634
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ...................... 250.327 197.841 859.633 7,179.394 3,574.162
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ...................... 618.084 308.191 1,200.966 14,120.080 7,029.228
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ...................... 563.752 325.531 1,246.684 11,898.910 6,501.998
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. ..... 208.138 106.060 491.002 4,920.619 2,468.192
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. ................ 113.696 66.277 287.292 2,873.802 1,450.827
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. ...................... 834.588 487.044 2,112.270 21,154.029 10,747.196
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. ................ 157.541 88.713 365.167 3,907.545 1,832.825
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ...................... 643.391 362.299 1,491.327 15,958.265 7,485.189
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A,
Ltd. ........................................... 553.134 153.947 705.887 9,228.521 4,636.341
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B,
Ltd. ........................................... 348.562 183.827 852.462 9,400.038 4,368.675
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. ..... 525.646 229.811 959.391 12,336.452 5,141.312
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. ................ 144.189 81.404 314.160 3,480.240 1,705.478
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ...................... 491.675 277.590 1,071.291 11,868.418 5,816.075
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. ................ 185.600 84.916 353.516 4,354.398 2,077.136
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ...................... 457.018 209.116 870.573 10,723.127 5,115.146
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. ................ 145.815 74.419 309.894 3,561.005 1,706.767
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ...................... 103.921 53.036 220.852 2,537.908 1,216.403
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A,
L.P. ........................................... 273.838 149.368 558.886 6,727.211 3,225.257
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. ..... 509.333 253.748 928.143 12,668.293 5,826.092
Parker & Parker 89-A Conv., L.P. ................. 136.107 64.524 282.306 3,433.908 1,667.718
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ...................... 404.668 191.841 839.377 10,210.849 4,959.027
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. ................ 276.640 159.018 597.289 6,717.103 3,379.724
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ...................... 304.369 175.038 657.490 7,386.746 3,718.741
C-10
TOTAL PROVED DEVELOPED PRODUCING
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NET RESERVES TO FUTURE NET REVENUE, M$
THE EVALUATED INTERESTS ----------------------------
--------------------------------------- DISCOUNTED
OIL/CONDENSATE LIQUID GAS PER ANNUM AT
PIONEER FUNDS (Mbbl) (Mbbl) (MMcf) UNDISCOUNTED 10.00 PERCENT
------------- -------------- --------- ---------- ------------ -------------
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P. ..... 324.948 138.741 489.327 6,929.194 3,302.639
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. ................ 86.964 46.820 168.458 2,004.818 1,042.228
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ...................... 253.836 136.323 490.071 5,806.774 3,011.223
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. ................ 503.298 242.511 965.950 11,527.923 5,694.202
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ...................... 1,370.202 658.317 2,621.779 31,316.135 15,461.210
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. ................ 323.794 138.198 463.058 6,302.167 3,212.933
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ...................... 520.528 222.164 744.398 10,131.499 5,165.181
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P. ..... 584.599 228.964 801.496 12,370.155 5,691.401
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development,
L.P. ........................................... 313.028 100.516 377.597 5,906.691 2,549.362
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ...................... 662.796 306.258 1,409.517 17,786.756 8,134.929
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ...................... 719.664 311.695 1,213.315 17,109.740 8,280.085
---------- --------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Total All Partnerships............................ 17,189.160 8,638.440 35,249.259 400,514.251 195,847.226
C-11
APPENDIX D
TO
[ROBERT A. STANGER LOGO] PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
FAIRNESS OPINION
OF
ROBERT A. STANGER & CO., INC.
August 20, 2001
Board of Directors of
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
As the Sole or Managing General Partner of
The Partnerships Identified on Exhibit I
1400 Williams Square West
5205 North O'Connor Boulevard
Irving, Texas 75039
Gentlemen:
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), the sole or managing
general partner of the partnerships identified in Exhibit I attached hereto
("the Partnerships"), has advised us that the Partnerships are contemplating a
transaction (the "Transaction") pursuant to an agreement (the "Merger
Agreement") in which the Partnerships will merge with and into Pioneer USA and
the interests of the limited partners (the "Limited Partners") in each
Partnership will be converted into the right to receive shares of common stock
(the "Pioneer Parent Shares") of Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer
Parent") equal to the estimated value of such Partnership's oil and gas reserves
(the "Reserve Value") and net working capital (the "Working Capital Balance") as
of March 31, 2001, less such Partnership's pro rata share, based upon its
Reserve Value, of the first $2 million of estimated expenses and fees of the
mergers of all of the Partnerships and a cash distribution made in July, 2001
(collectively, referred to herein as the "Merger Value"). We have been advised
that the Merger Value will be allocated and paid to holders of limited
partnership interests (the "Limited Partner Interests") of each Partnership in
accordance with the provisions of the Partnership agreement of each Partnership
relating to a liquidation of the Partnership.
We have been further advised that the Reserve Value has been established by
Pioneer USA and its parent company, Pioneer Parent, based upon the present value
of estimated future net revenues (after certain expenses and charges) from each
Partnership's proved oil and gas reserves as of March 31, 2001 utilizing prices
for 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and thereafter of $26.17, $24.36, $22.83, $22.31 and
$21.97 per barrel of oil and $5.18, $4.61, $4.16, $4.09 and $4.12 per thousand
cubic feet of gas, and a discount rate of 10.0%. We have been further advised
that the Reserve Value is based upon the reserve report of Pioneer USA and
Pioneer Parent, as reviewed by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.
("Williamson"), an independent petroleum engineering firm, as of March 31, 2001,
and to which Pioneer USA and Pioneer Parent applied the prices previously stated
(the "Reserve Analysis").
We have been advised that the Limited Partners in each Partnership will
have the opportunity to approve or reject the participation by their Partnership
in the Transaction pursuant to a proxy statement/prospectus (the "Proxy
Statement/Prospectus") and a Limited Partners meeting which will be prepared and
held, respectively, in connection with the Transaction, and further that Limited
Partners in each Partnership, in exchange for Limited Partner Interests, will
receive the allocated Merger Value in Pioneer Parent Shares. We have been
advised that the value to be ascribed to each share of Pioneer Parent, which is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), shall be equal to the average
closing price for such shares on the NYSE for the ten trading day period ending
three business days prior to the special meeting of the Limited Partners
contemplated herein.
You have requested that Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc. ("Stanger") provide
an opinion as to the fairness from a financial point of view to the unaffiliated
Limited Partners of each Partnership and the unaffiliated limited partners of
the nonmanaging general partner of each applicable Partnership of the Merger
Value ascribed to each Partnership and the allocation thereof to: (i) the
Limited Partners of each Partnership, as a group; (ii) the general partners of
each Partnership as a group; (iii) Pioneer USA, as the managing or sole general
partner of each partnership; (iv) the
D-1
unaffiliated Limited Partners of each Partnership, as a group; and (v) the
unaffiliated limited partners of the nonmanaging general partner of each
applicable Partnership as a group.
Stanger, founded in 1978, has provided research, investment banking and
consulting services to clients located throughout the United States, including
major New York Stock Exchange member firms and insurance companies and over
seventy companies engaged in the management and operations of partnerships. The
investment banking activities of Stanger include financial advisory services,
asset and securities valuations, industry and company research and analysis,
litigation support and expert witness services, and due diligence investigations
in connection with both publicly registered and privately placed securities
transactions.
Stanger, as part of its investment banking business, is regularly engaged
in the valuation of securities in connection with mergers, acquisitions, and
reorganizations and for estate, tax, corporate and other purposes. In
particular, Stanger's valuation practice principally involves partnerships,
partnership securities and assets typically owned through partnerships
including, but not limited to, oil and gas reserves, real estate, mortgages
secured by real estate, cable television systems, and equipment leasing assets.
In arriving at the opinion set forth below, we have:
- Reviewed the Preliminary Proxy Statement/Prospectus;
- Reviewed a draft of the Merger Agreement which Pioneer USA has indicated
to be in substantially the form which will be executed in connection with
the Transaction;
- Reviewed the financial statements of each partnership, including, if
applicable, the partnership's Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and
1998;
- Reviewed the Reserve Analyses of each Partnership reviewed by Williamson
as of March 31, 2001;
- Reviewed the Reserve Analyses of each Partnership prepared by Williamson
as of December 31, 2000;
- Reviewed the calculations prepared by Pioneer USA and Pioneer Parent of
the Merger Value per $1,000 original investment in each Partnership;
- Reviewed Pioneer USA's analysis of other alternatives to the merger of
each partnership, including going concern value, liquidation value,
royalty trust and production payment;
- Reviewed estimates prepared by Pioneer USA and Pioneer Parent of the
going concern value and liquidation value per $1,000 original investment
in each Partnership;
- Interviewed key management personnel of Pioneer USA regarding the oil and
gas reserves, the financial condition of each Partnership and the terms
of the Transaction;
- Reviewed the financial statements of Pioneer Parent included in its Form
10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and its Form 10-K for the
years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998;
- Reviewed pro forma financial data for Pioneer Parent assuming the
completion of the Transaction;
- Reviewed recent secondary market trading activity for interests in the
Partnerships, as available;
- Reviewed recent trading activity in Pioneer Parent Shares; and
- Conducted such other studies, analyses, inquiries and investigations as
we deemed appropriate.
In rendering this opinion, we have relied, without independent
verification, on the accuracy and completeness in all material respects of all
financial and other information that was furnished or otherwise communicated to
us by Pioneer USA, Pioneer Parent and the Partnerships. We have been advised by
Pioneer USA and Pioneer Parent that the oil and gas properties owned by the
Partnerships are subject to operating agreements (the "Operating Agreements")
with Pioneer USA and that: (i) such Operating Agreements provide for the payment
of overhead charges and that such charges are reasonable compared to amounts
charged for similar services by third-party operators; and (ii) except for
cause, such Operating Agreements do not provide for the termination of Pioneer
USA as operator, and (iii) such Operating Agreements do not provide for the
revision of overhead charges, except as escalated under the terms of such
Operating Agreements. Furthermore, we have been advised by Pioneer USA and
Pioneer Parent that if each Partnership's reserves were offered for sale to a
third party, a condition of such sale would be that the oil and gas reserves
would continue to be subject to the Operating Agreements with Pioneer USA which
provide for the payment of overhead charges, and that it would be appropriate to
assume, when estimating the value of such reserves, that such charges would
D-2
continue. We have also been advised that the Merger Value of each Partnership
has been properly allocated between Pioneer USA, the unaffiliated limited
partners of the nonmanaging general partner, and Limited Partners of each
Partnership in accordance with the Partnership Agreement with respect to a
liquidation of such Partnership.
We have not performed an independent appraisal of the oil and gas reserves
or other assets and liabilities of the Partnerships. We have not conducted any
engineering studies and have relied on estimates of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
Parent, which were reviewed by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., with
respect to oil and gas reserve volumes, prices, operating costs, and overhead
charges.
We have relied on the assurance of Pioneer USA, Pioneer Parent and the
Partnerships that: (i) the Reserve Analysis provided to us was in the judgment
of Pioneer USA and the Partnerships reasonably prepared on bases consistent with
actual historical experience and reflect their best currently available
estimates and good faith judgments; (ii) there are no estimates of costs to
remediate environmental conditions included in the Reserve Analysis; (iii) any
historical financial data, balance sheet data, transaction cost estimates,
Merger Value analyses, going concern value analyses and liquidation value
analyses are accurate and complete in all material respects; (iv) all
allocations included within the calculations of Merger Values, going concern
values and liquidation values have been made in accordance with the Partnership
Agreement for each Partnership; (v) no material changes have occurred in the
information reviewed or in the value of the oil and gas reserves or Working
Capital Balances as of March 31, 2001 of each Partnership between the date the
information was provided to us and the date of this letter; (vi) the relative
ownership interest of the Limited Partners, unaffiliated Limited Partners,
general partners, unaffiliated limited partners of the nonmanaging general
partner of each applicable Partnership and Pioneer USA, as manager or sole
general partner, is accurately included in accordance with the Partnership
Agreements on the analyses provided to us by Pioneer USA; (vii) neither Pioneer
Parent or any of its affiliates has during the thirty days prior to the date
hereof commenced or continued a share repurchase program or similar transaction
which could affect the Pioneer Parent Share price to be used in the Transaction;
and (viii) Pioneer USA, Pioneer Parent and the Partnerships are not aware of any
information or facts regarding the Partnerships, the oil and gas properties, the
Reserve Analysis or the Working Capital Balances of each Partnership that would
cause the information supplied to us to be incomplete or misleading in any
material respect.
We have not been requested to, and therefore did not: (i) make any
recommendation to Pioneer USA, the Partnerships or the Limited Partners with
respect to whether to approve or reject the Transaction; (ii) determine or
negotiate the amount or form of the Merger Value to be paid for Limited Partner
Interests in the Transaction; (iii) offer the assets of the Partnerships for
sale to any third party; (iv) express any opinion as to: (a) the impact of the
Transaction with respect to Pioneer USA or the Limited Partners of any
Partnerships that do not participate in the Transaction; (b) the tax
consequences of the Transaction for Pioneer USA, the unaffiliated limited
partners of the nonmanaging general partner or the Limited Partners of any
Partnership; (c) Pioneer USA's or Pioneer Parent's ability to finance their
obligations pursuant to the Merger Agreement or the impact of a failure to
obtain financing on the financial performance of Pioneer USA, Pioneer Parent or
the Partnerships; (d) Pioneer USA's decision to estimate the Reserve Value of
the oil and gas reserves of each Partnership based upon the continued operation
of the properties by Pioneer USA and the payment of overhead charges in
accordance with existing Operating Agreements or the impact, if any, on the
estimated values of the Partnerships' oil and gas reserves if Pioneer USA and
Pioneer Parent determined to offer or operate the assets subject to revised
Operating Agreements; (e) whether or not alternative methods of determining the
Merger Value would have also provided fair results or results substantially
similar to the methodology used; (f) alternatives to the Transaction, including
the offering of such assets for sale to third-party buyers; (g) the trading
price of Pioneer Parent Shares immediately following the closing of the
Transaction and the distribution of Pioneer Parent Shares in connection
therewith; (h) the fairness of the termination of the repurchase obligations of
Pioneer USA with respect to those partnerships wherein Pioneer USA is obligated
to offer to repurchase limited partnership interests annually based upon a
formula which, in certain circumstances including the repurchase offers based
upon December 31, 2000 oil and gas prices, result in repurchase offer prices
above the market value for the reserves of such Partnerships; or (i) any other
terms of the Transaction.
This letter does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses
performed or the matters considered in rendering this opinion. The analyses and
the summary set forth herein must be considered as a whole, and selecting
portions of such summary or analyses without considering all factors and
analyses would create an incomplete view of the process underlying this opinion.
In rendering this opinion, judgment was applied to a variety of complex analyses
and assumptions. The assumptions made and the judgments applied in rendering the
opinion are not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description.
The fact that any specific analysis is referred to herein is not meant to
indicate that such analysis was given greater weight than any other analyses.
D-3
Our opinion is based on business, economic, oil and gas market, and other
conditions as of the date of our analysis and addresses the Merger Value in the
context of information available as of the date of our analysis. Events
occurring after that date could affect the value of the assets of the
Partnerships or the assumptions used in preparing this opinion.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the
date of this letter and subject to the assumptions, limitations and
qualifications contained herein, the Merger Value ascribed to each Partnership
in connection with the Transaction and the allocation thereof to: (i) the
Limited Partners of each Partnership, as a group; (ii) the general partners of
each Partnership, as a group; (iii) Pioneer USA, as the managing or sole general
partner of each Partnership; (iv) the unaffiliated Limited Partners of each
Partnership, as a group; and (v) the unaffiliated limited partners of the
non-managing general partner of each applicable Partnership, as a group; is fair
to the unaffiliated Limited Partners of each Partnership and the unaffiliated
limited partners of the nonmanaging general partner of each applicable
Partnership, from a financial point of view.
Yours truly,
/s/ ROBERT A. STANGER & CO., INC.
Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc.
Shrewsbury, New Jersey
August 20, 2001
D-4
EXHIBIT I
PARTNERSHIPS
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.
D-5
APPENDIX E
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
THE MERGER PROPOSALS
The merger proposals for each partnership, except as otherwise indicated,
are set forth below. For each partnership, the merger proposals include the
approval of:
- the merger agreement dated September 20, 2001, for that partnership,
pursuant to which:
- the partnership will be merged with and into Pioneer USA, on the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement as
described in the proxy statement/prospectus; and
- each partner, whether limited or general, but other than Pioneer USA,
will receive Pioneer Parent common stock in an amount based on the
merger value of that partnership in exchange for that partner's
partnership interests;
- the merger amendment for that partnership authorizing:
- the merger of the partnership with and into Pioneer USA, with Pioneer
USA being the surviving entity;
- the elimination of any restrictions on the merger otherwise contained
in the partnership's partnership agreement; and
- the opinion of special legal counsel for the limited partners and the
selection of that counsel.
For each partnership, approval of the merger proposals requires the
affirmative vote of limited partners who own or have the power to vote a
majority, or 66 2/3% for Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B,
L.P., of the limited partnership interests in that partnership. The effect of an
abstention or a failure to vote is the same as a vote against the merger
proposals. See "The Special Meetings -- Record Date; Voting Rights and Proxies."
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger of each partnership as
described in the proxy statement/prospectus under "The Merger Agreement," if the
merger proposals are approved by a partnership, that participating partnership
will merge with and into Pioneer USA, with Pioneer USA being the surviving
entity. From and after the closing of the merger of each participating
partnership, the partnership interests of the partners in that partnership will
represent the right to receive an amount of Pioneer Parent common stock as
described in the proxy statement/prospectus.
Generally, the partnership agreement of each partnership requires that
special legal counsel for the limited partners, acceptable to the partnership,
deliver a legal opinion, acceptable to the partnership, that (1) neither the
grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the partnership by
its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax classification
of the partnership or any of its limited partners and (2) neither the grant nor
exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited partner's limited
liability. Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, (relying
as to matters of Texas law on the opinion of Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas,
Texas) has delivered that opinion, subject to the approval of the limited
partners of that opinion and the selection of special legal counsel for the
limited partners for the limited purpose of rendering that opinion. See "The
Merger of Each Partnership -- Legal Opinion for Limited Partners."
APPROVAL OF MERGER FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP FORMED IN TEXAS:
RESOLVED: That, subject to receipt of a favorable opinion of special legal
counsel for the limited partners as described in the proxy statement/prospectus,
the partnership be merged with and into Pioneer USA, with Pioneer USA being the
surviving entity, and that an amount of Pioneer Parent common stock be issued to
each partner, other than Pioneer USA, in accordance with the terms set forth in
the merger agreement included as Appendix F to the proxy statement/prospectus
and subject to the conditions set forth therein.
E-1
RESOLVED: That, subject to receipt of a favorable opinion of special legal
counsel for the limited partners as described in the proxy statement/prospectus,
the following new article shall be added to the partnership agreement of the
partnership:
ARTICLE
Notwithstanding any provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, it is
hereby agreed as follows:
1. Definitions. For the purposes of this Article, "Proxy
Statement/Prospectus" means the proxy statement/ prospectus dated October
12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company, a Delaware corporation
("Pioneer Parent"), and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Pioneer USA"), contained in the Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (File No. 333-59094) of Pioneer Parent filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
2. Elimination of Restrictions to Transaction. Notwithstanding
anything in this Agreement to the contrary, upon the consent of limited
partners holding a majority of the outstanding limited partnership
interests in the partnership, which consent may or may not be the same
consent to the adoption of an amendment to this Agreement, the merger of
the partnership described in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the Merger
Agreement included as Appendix F thereto shall be authorized by the
Agreement and the limited partners, and no provision of this Agreement
shall prohibit, limit or prevent:
(a) the merger or consolidation of the partnership, including the
merger described in the Proxy Statement/ Prospectus, with any other
domestic limited partnership or other entity, as those terms are defined
in the Texas Revised Limited Partnership Act, and
(b) the consummation of the merger of the partnership as described
in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
In addition, no consent of the partnership, Pioneer USA or any partner or
other procedure, including the delivery of opinions of counsel, shall be
required in order to enable the partnership, Pioneer USA or any partner to
effect the merger.
3. Mergers. For purposes of this Agreement, each merger described in
the Proxy Statement/Prospectus shall be treated as if the partnership has:
(a) disposed of all of its assets and liabilities to Pioneer USA in
exchange for an amount of Pioneer Parent common stock representing the
merger value of the partnership, and
(b) liquidated in the manner provided in the liquidation provisions
of this Agreement.
Accordingly, upon the partnership's deemed liquidation resulting from the
merger, Pioneer Parent will issue an amount of Pioneer Parent common stock
to the partners, other than Pioneer USA, in accordance with the liquidation
provisions of this Agreement. For purposes of Texas law, the merger shall
be a merger subject to the provisions of Section 2.11 of the Texas Revised
Limited Partnership Act.
4. Authority of Pioneer USA as General Partner. By obtaining the
approval of the limited partners described in Section 2 of this Article,
the partnership hereby extends the power of attorney granted to Pioneer USA
pursuant to this Agreement to permit Pioneer USA to execute the merger
agreement described in the Proxy Statement/ Prospectus and the merger
amendment contemplated by this Article on behalf of the limited partners.
Pioneer USA shall be authorized, at such time in its full discretion as it
deems appropriate, to execute, acknowledge, verify, deliver, file and
record, for and in the name and on behalf of the partnership, Pioneer USA
and the limited partners, any and all documents, agreements, certificates
and instruments, and shall do and perform any and all acts required by
applicable law or which Pioneer USA deems necessary or advisable in order
to give effect to this Article and the transactions contemplated herein,
including, but not limited to, the merger.
5. This Article Controlling. The provisions of this Article shall
control over all other provisions of this Agreement.
Except as herein expressly amended, all other terms and provisions of this
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
E-2
APPROVAL OF MERGER FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP FORMED IN DELAWARE:
RESOLVED: That, subject to receipt of a favorable opinion of special legal
counsel for the limited partners as described in the proxy statement/prospectus,
the partnership be merged with and into Pioneer USA, with Pioneer USA being the
surviving entity, and that an amount of Pioneer Parent common stock be issued to
each partner, other than Pioneer USA, in accordance with the terms set forth in
the merger agreement included as Appendix F to the proxy statement/prospectus
and subject to the conditions set forth therein.
RESOLVED: That, subject to receipt of a favorable opinion of special legal
counsel for the limited partners as described in the proxy statement/prospectus,
the following new article shall be added to the partnership agreement of the
partnership:
ARTICLE
Notwithstanding any provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, it is
hereby agreed as follows:
1. Definitions. For the purposes of this Article, "Proxy
Statement/Prospectus" means the proxy statement/ prospectus dated October
12, 2001 of Pioneer Natural Resources Company, a Delaware corporation
("Pioneer Parent"), and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Pioneer USA"), contained in the Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (File No. 333-59094) of Pioneer Parent filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
2. Elimination of Restrictions to Transaction. Notwithstanding
anything in this Agreement to the contrary, upon the consent of limited
partners holding a majority of the outstanding limited partnership
interests in the partnership, which consent may or may not be the same
consent to the adoption of an amendment to this Agreement, no provision of
this Agreement shall prohibit, limit or prevent:
(a) the merger or consolidation of the partnership, including the
merger described in the Proxy Statement/ Prospectus, with any other
domestic limited partnership or other business entity, as those terms
are defined in the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, and
(b) the consummation of the merger of the partnership as described
in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
In addition, no consent of the partnership, Pioneer USA or any partner or
other procedure, including the delivery of opinions of counsel, shall be
required in order to enable the partnership, Pioneer USA or any partner to
effect the merger.
3. Mergers. For purposes of this Agreement, each merger described in
the Proxy Statement/Prospectus shall be treated as if the partnership has:
(a) disposed of all of its assets and liabilities to Pioneer USA in
exchange for an amount of Pioneer Parent common stock representing the
merger value of the partnership, and
(b) liquidated in the manner provided in the liquidation provisions
of this Agreement.
Accordingly, upon the partnership's deemed liquidation resulting from the
merger, Pioneer Parent will issue an amount of Pioneer Parent common stock
to the partners, other than Pioneer USA, in accordance with the liquidation
provisions of this Agreement. For purposes of Delaware law, the merger
shall be a merger subject to the provisions of Section 17.11 of the
Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act.
4. Authority of Pioneer USA as General Partner. By obtaining the
approval of the limited partners described in Section 2 of this Article,
the partnership hereby extends the power of attorney granted to Pioneer USA
pursuant to this Agreement to permit Pioneer USA to execute the merger
agreement described in the Proxy Statement/ Prospectus and the merger
amendment contemplated by this Article on behalf of the limited partners.
Pioneer USA shall be authorized, at such time in its full discretion as it
deems appropriate, to execute, acknowledge, verify, deliver, file and
record, for and in the name and on behalf of the partnership, Pioneer USA
and the limited partners, any and all documents, agreements, certificates
and instruments, and shall do and perform any and all acts required by
applicable law or which Pioneer USA deems necessary or advisable in order
to give effect to this Article and the transactions contemplated herein,
including, but not limited to, the merger.
5. This Article Controlling. The provisions of this Article shall
control over all other provisions of this Agreement.
E-3
Except as herein expressly amended, all other terms and provisions of this
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
APPROVAL OF COUNSEL TO LIMITED PARTNERS FOR EACH PARTNERSHIP:
RESOLVED: That the selection of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP of
Wilmington, Delaware, and, as to matters of Texas law, Arter & Hadden LLP of
Dallas, Texas, as special legal counsel for the limited partners of the
partnership for the limited purpose of rendering the legal opinion described in
the proxy statement/prospectus under "The Merger of Each Partnership -- Legal
Opinion for Limited Partners" be and hereby is approved by Pioneer USA, on
behalf of the partnership, and the limited partners of such partnership.
RESOLVED: That the legal opinion delivered pursuant to the partnership
agreement of the partnership as described in the proxy statement/prospectus
under "The Merger of Each Partnership -- Legal Opinion for Limited Partners," in
form and substance as set forth in Exhibit A to these merger proposals, be and
hereby is approved as in form and substance satisfactory to the limited partners
of such partnership in their reasonable judgment.
E-4
EXHIBIT A
TO
APPENDIX E
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
[STRADLEY RONON LOGO]
Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP
919 North Market Street, Suite 600
P.O. Box 2170
Wilmington, DE 19899-2170
September 20, 2001
To:Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner of
The Limited Partners of the
Limited Partnerships Named in
the Proxy Statement/Prospectus
Dated September 20, 2001 and
Listed on Schedules A-1 and A-2 Hereto,
On Behalf of the Limited Partners
RE:Amendment to Limited Partnership Agreement; Merger with
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
As special legal counsel for the limited partners (the "Limited Partners")
of each of the limited partnerships listed on Schedule A-1 hereto (the "Texas
Limited Partnerships") and on Schedule A-2 hereto (the "Delaware Limited
Partnerships" and together with the Texas Limited Partnerships, each Texas
Limited Partnership and Delaware Limited Partnership, individually, a "Limited
Partnership" and collectively, the "Limited Partnerships"), we have been asked
to render certain opinions of law in connection with the proposed amendment
("Amendment") to each Partnership Agreement (as defined below) and proposed
merger ("Merger") of each Limited Partnership with and into Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Pioneer USA") pursuant to that
certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 20, 2001 (the "Merger
Agreement") among Pioneer Natural Resources Company, a Delaware corporation
("Pioneer Parent"), Pioneer USA and each Limited Partnership. These opinions are
issued in connection with the proxy statement/prospectus forming a part of
Pioneer Parent's registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-59094) (the
"Registration Statement") relating to the registration of the issuance of its
shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, in connection with the merger
of each of the Limited Partnerships with and into Pioneer USA and related
transactions. We note that our representation is limited solely to the issues
that are the subject of opinions 1 and 2 set forth herein.
For purposes of giving the opinions hereinafter set forth, our examination
of documents has been limited to the examination of executed or conformed
counterparts, or copies otherwise proved to our satisfaction, of the following:
(a) Copies of the Agreement of Limited Partnership (and any amendment
thereto) of each of the Limited Partnerships in the form as attached to the
General Partner's Certificate (as defined below) (each, as amended, a
"Partnership Agreement");
(b) Certified copies of the Certificate of Limited Partnership of each
of the Delaware Limited Partnerships as filed in the Office of the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware;
(c) General Partner's Certificate of Pioneer USA dated as of September
20, 2001 ("General Partner's Certificate");
E-5
(d) Appendix E to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus forming part of the
Registration Statement, setting forth the proposed approvals by the Limited
Partners of each Limited Partnership of (i) the Merger of such Limited
Partnership, as provided in the Merger Agreement and (ii) the amendments to
each Partnership Agreement to authorize the Merger of such Limited
Partnership (collectively, the "Merger Proposals"); and
(e) Appendix F to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus forming part of the
Registration Statement, containing the Merger Agreement.
For purposes of giving the opinions hereinafter set forth, we have not
reviewed any documents, or any documents referred to or incorporated by
reference in the documents we reviewed, other than the documents listed above.
We assume that there are no agreements, understandings or usage of trade or
course of prior dealing among the parties that would qualify the documents
reviewed. We have conducted no independent factual investigation of our own but
rather have relied solely upon the foregoing documents, the statements and
information set forth therein, and the additional matters recited or assumed
herein, all of which we assume to be true, complete and accurate in all material
respects.
With respect to all documents examined by us, we have assumed (i) that all
signatures on such documents are genuine, (ii) that all documents submitted to
us as originals are authentic, (iii) that all documents submitted to us as
copies conform with the original copies of those documents, and (iv) the legal
capacity of natural persons.
For purposes of the opinions expressed herein, we have also assumed, with
respect to each of the Limited Partnerships, (i) that such Limited Partnership's
Partnership Agreement in the form attached to the General Partner's Certificate
constitutes the entire agreement among the parties thereto with respect to the
subject matter thereof, and that such Partnership Agreement is in full force and
effect; (ii) the due authorization, execution and delivery of such Limited
Partnership's Partnership Agreement by each of the parties thereto; (iii) that
such Limited Partnership's Certificate of Limited Partnership was duly
authorized, executed and delivered by the General Partner of such Limited
Partnership and duly filed with the appropriate Secretary of State; (iv) that
the representations and warranties of the parties to such Limited Partnership's
Partnership Agreement are true and correct; (v) that such Limited Partnership is
validly existing and no event of dissolution has occurred with respect to such
Limited Partnership and no event of withdrawal from such Limited Partnership by
the General Partner of such Limited Partnership has occurred; and(vi) that all
acts necessary to be performed by each Partner of such Limited Partnership for
its admission to the Limited Partnership have been done in accordance with such
Limited Partnership's Partnership Agreement; and (vii) that the proposed
Amendment to such Limited Partnership's Partnership Agreement will be approved
by the limited partners of such Limited Partnership at the time of or before the
vote by the limited partners of such Limited Partnership on the proposed Merger.
This opinion is limited to the application of (i) the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), final regulations incorporated in Treasury
Decisions issued under the Code ("Regulations"), rulings or procedures the
Internal Revenue Service has issued, and court decisions interpreting the Code,
Regulations, or administrative pronouncements, all of which as issued and
effective on September 20, 2001, and which we deemed material to this opinion,
and (ii) with respect to the Delaware Limited Partnerships, applicable Delaware
law, including the Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act, 6 Del. C. Ch. 15,
and the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 6 Del. C. Ch. 17 (the
"LP Act") (but excluding the securities law and environmental laws of the State
of Delaware) to the matters set forth below which, in our experience, are the
laws of the State of Delaware normally applicable to such matters and (iii) with
respect to the Texas Limited Partnerships, Texas law, provided that with respect
to matters of Texas law we have relied entirely upon the opinion of the firm of
Arter & Hadden addressed to us and dated of even date herewith in the form
attached hereto (the "Texas Opinion"). We have not been requested to and do not
opine as to the applicability of the laws of any other jurisdiction. In
rendering the opinions set forth herein, we have not reviewed and express no
opinion as to the operation or effect of any laws, rules or regulations
applicable to the assets owned by each of the Limited Partnerships.
This opinion letter speaks only as of the date hereof and we do not
undertake to update the opinions expressed herein for any change in law or fact
that may occur after such date.
Based upon the foregoing, and subject to the assumptions, qualifications,
limitations and exceptions set forth herein, we are of the opinion that:
1. Neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve or
disapprove (i) an amendment to the Partnership Agreement of a Limited
Partnership or (ii) the merger of such Limited Partnership with and into
Pioneer USA, as provided in the Merger Agreement, in each case as set forth
in the Merger Proposals, by the Limited Partners of such Limited
Partnership will adversely affect the federal income tax classification of
such Limited Partnership or any of its Limited Partners; and
E-6
2. Neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve or
disapprove (i) an amendment to the Partnership Agreement of a Limited
Partnership or (ii) the merger of such Limited Partnership with and into
Pioneer USA, as provided in the Merger Agreement, in each case as set forth
in the Merger Proposals, by the Limited Partners of such Limited
Partnership will result in the loss of any Limited Partner's limited
liability by virtue of such grant or exercise.
The foregoing opinions are subject to the following additional exceptions
and qualifications:
(A) We express no opinion with respect to the limited liability of any
Limited Partner who is, was or may become a General Partner of a Limited
Partnership or a general partner of a named General Partner.
(B) In giving opinion (2) with respect to the Texas Limited
Partnerships, we note that the Texas Opinion is subject to the assumptions,
limitations, qualifications and exceptions set forth therein.
This opinion is for your benefit and may not be relied upon by any other
person, or by you in any other context or for any other purpose, nor may copies
hereof be delivered, distributed, published, quoted or otherwise communicated to
any other person without our prior written consent. We hereby consent to the
filing of this opinion letter as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and
the references to us under the heading "Legal Matters" in the proxy
statement/prospectus that forms a part of the Registration Statement. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of this consent into any subsequent
registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under 1933 Act in
connection with the offering. In giving this consent, we do not hereby admit
that we are within the category of persons whose consent is required under
Section 7 of the 1933 Act and the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission promulgated thereunder.
Very truly yours,
STRADLEY, RONON, STEVENS & YOUNG, LLP
By: /s/ ELLISA OPSTBAUM HABBART
---------------------------------------
Ellisa Opstbaum Habbart, a Partner
EOH/AGK/emc
E-7
ARTER & HADDEN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
founded 1843
1717 Main Street, Suite 4100
Dallas, Texas 75201-4605
telephone 214.761.2100
facsimile 214.741.7139
September 20, 2001
Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP
919 North Market Street, Suite 600
P.O. Box 2170
Wilmington, DE 19899-2170
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as special Texas counsel to you in connection with the
delivery of your legal opinion to Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("Pioneer USA") and the limited partners of those certain
Texas limited partnerships set forth in Exhibit A hereto (each a "Partnership")
in connection with the proposed amendments to each Partnership Agreement (as
defined below) and the proposed merger (each, a "Merger") of each Partnership
with and into Pioneer USA, pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of September 20, 2001 (the "Merger Agreement") among Pioneer Natural
Resources Company, a Delaware corporation ("Pioneer Parent"), Pioneer USA, each
Partnership and certain other limited partnerships. This opinion is being
delivered in support of your opinions to be included as Exhibit A of Appendix E
("Appendix E") to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus forming a part of Pioneer
Parent's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-59094) (the
"Registration Statement") relating to the registration of the issuance of shares
of common stock, $.01 par value per share, of Pioneer Parent in the Mergers and
other related mergers under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act").
A. BASIS OF OPINION.
For purposes of this opinion, we have made such investigations as we deem
necessary or appropriate and have reviewed and considered the following:
1. Copies of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of each Partnership
and any amendments thereto, certified by Pioneer USA as each Partnership's
sole or managing general partner, as applicable (each, as amended, a
"Partnership Agreement").
2. Appendix E to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus forming a part of the
Registration Statement, setting forth the proposed approvals by the limited
partners of each Partnership of (i) the Merger of such Partnership, as
provided in the Merger Agreement and (ii) the amendments to each
Partnership Agreement to authorize each Merger (collectively, the "Merger
Proposals").
3. Appendix F to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus forming a part of the
Registration Statement, containing the Merger Agreement.
4. The Certificate of General Partner dated September 20, 2001,
executed by Pioneer USA as the sale managing general partner of each
Partnership.
For the purpose of this opinion letter, the documents and information
referred to in this Section A are herein collectively referred to as the
"Documents."
For purposes of giving the opinions hereinafter set forth, we have not
reviewed any documents, or any documents referred to or incorporated by
reference in the documents we reviewed, other than the documents listed above.
In addition, we advise you that we have not received or reviewed the Certificate
of Limited Partnership for each Partnership. We assume that there are no
agreements, understandings or usage of trade or course of prior dealing among
the parties that would qualify the documents reviewed. We have conducted no
independent factual investigation of our own but rather have relied solely upon
the foregoing documents, the statements and information set forth therein, and
the additional matters recited or assumed herein, all of which we assume to be
true, complete and accurate in all material respects.
E-8
B. OPINION.
Based upon our examination and consideration of the foregoing Documents,
and reliance thereon, and subject to the assumptions, limitations,
qualifications and exceptions, set forth in Section C, we are of the opinion
that:
Neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve or
disapprove (i) an amendment to such Partnership's Partnership
Agreement or (ii) the Merger of such Partnership, as provided in
the applicable Merger Agreement, in each case as set forth in
the Merger Proposals, by the limited partners of such
Partnership will result in the loss of any limited partner's
limited liability by virtue of such grant or exercise.
C. ASSUMPTIONS, LIMITATIONS, QUALIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS.
The opinion expressed in Section B are based upon and subject to the
further assumptions, limitations, qualifications and exceptions set forth below:
1. We have assumed without investigation the genuineness of all
signatures and the authenticity of all Documents submitted to us as
originals, the conformity to authentic original Documents of all Documents
submitted to us as certified or photographic copies, the veracity of all
Documents and the legal capacity of all natural persons executing such
Documents.
2. We have assumed, with respect to each Partnership, that such
Partnership is validly existing and that no event of dissolution has
occurred with respect to such Partnership and no event of withdrawal from
such Partnership by the general partner thereof has occurred.
3. The opinions expressed herein are specifically limited to the laws
of the State of Texas, to present judicial interpretations thereof and to
facts as they currently exist.
4. We express no opinion with respect to the limited liability of any
limited partner who is, was or may become (a) a general partner of a
Partnership or (b) a general partner of any general partner of a
Partnership.
5. We express no opinions other than the opinion set forth in Section
B.
We bring to your attention the fact that this legal opinion is an
expression of professional judgment and not a guaranty of result. This opinion
is given as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update or
supplement such opinion to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter
come to our attention or any changes in laws or judicial decisions that may
hereafter occur.
This opinion is provided at your request and has been solely for your
benefit and for the benefit of the limited partners of each Partnership and may
not be used, circulated, quoted, given to any other person or otherwise referred
to in connection with any other transaction, and no other person or entity shall
be entitled to rely hereon without the express written consent of this firm. We
hereby consent to the filing of this opinion letter as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the references to our firm and this opinion
contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus forming a part of the Registration
Statement. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of this consent
into any subsequent registration filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the
Securities Act in connection with the offering. In giving this consent, we do
not hereby admit that we are within the category of persons whose consent is
required under Section 7 of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission promulgated thereunder.
Very truly yours,
Arter & Hadden LLP
E-9
EXHIBIT A
TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd.
E-10
APPENDIX F
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
(DRILLING AND INCOME FUNDS)
THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER dated as of September 20, 2001 (this
"Merger Agreement"), is entered into by and among Pioneer Natural Resources
Company, a Delaware corporation ("Pioneer Parent"), Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Parent
("Pioneer USA"), and each of the limited partnerships referred to below (each, a
"Partnership" and collectively, the "Partnerships").
RECITALS
A. Pioneer USA is the sole or managing general partner of each of the
following Partnerships:
STATE OF
PARTNERSHIP NAME FORMATION
---------------- ---------
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. ............................... Texas
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. ............................... Texas
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. .............................. Texas
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. ............. Texas
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. ...... Texas
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. ............... Texas
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. .......................... Texas
Parker & Parsley 87-A , Ltd. ............................... Texas
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. .......................... Texas
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. ................................ Texas
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. ........... Texas
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. ........... Texas
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. ............... Texas
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. .......................... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. ................................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. .......................... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. ................................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. .......................... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. ................................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P. ........... Delaware
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. ............... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. .......................... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. ................................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. .......................... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. ................................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P. ............... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. .......................... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. ................................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. .......................... Delaware
F-1
STATE OF
PARTNERSHIP NAME FORMATION
---------------- ---------
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. ................................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. .......................... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. ................................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P. ............... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P. .... Delaware
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. ................................ Delaware
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. ................................ Delaware
B. Each of P&P Employees 81-I, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, P&P
Employees 81-II, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, P&P Employees 82-I, Ltd., a
Texas limited partnership, P&P Employees 82-II, Ltd., a Texas limited
partnership, P&P Employees 82-III, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, P&P
Employees 83-A, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, P&P Employees 83-B, Ltd., a
Texas limited partnership, and P&P Employees 84-A, Ltd., a Texas limited
partnership (individually, the "Nonmanaging General Partner" and collectively,
the "Nonmanaging General Partners"), is the nonmanaging general partner of
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd., Parker & Parsley
82-I, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd., Parker
& Parsley 83-A, Ltd. Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. and Parker & Parsley 84-A,
Ltd., respectively.
C. Pioneer USA is the sole general partner of each of the Nonmanaging
General Partners and in such capacity has authority (i) to cause the Nonmanaging
General Partner to perform its obligations under the partnership agreement of
the respective Partnership; and (ii) to exercise on behalf of the Nonmanaging
General Partner all of the rights and elections granted to such Nonmanaging
General Partner by the respective Partnership.
D. The board of directors of each of Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA has
determined that it is in the best interests of Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA
(in its individual capacity, as the sole or managing general partner of each
Partnership and as the sole general partner of each Nonmanaging General Partner)
to merge each Partnership with and into Pioneer USA and each such board of
directors has approved the merger of each Partnership referred to below, upon
the terms and subject to the conditions contained herein.
E. Pioneer USA intends to solicit the vote of the limited partners of each
Partnership holding at least a majority (or with respect to Parker & Parsley
91-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. (each, a "Super-Majority
Partnership"), at least 66 2/3%) of the outstanding limited partnership
interests of the Partnership to approve the merger of the Partnership. Subject
to certain limitations, upon consummation of the merger of each Partnership, the
partners, other than Pioneer USA, will have the right to receive a number of
shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Pioneer Parent together
with associated rights to acquire Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock
(the common stock, together with the rights, the "Pioneer Parent Common Stock").
AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
1.1 Merger of Each Partnership. At the Effective Time (as defined in
Section 1.4), each Partnership shall be merged with and into Pioneer USA, the
separate existence of the Partnership shall cease, and Pioneer USA, as the
surviving corporation, shall continue to exist by virtue of and shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Delaware.
1.2 Merger Value for Each Partnership; Pioneer Parent Common Stock
Offered.
(a) At the Effective Time, by virtue of the merger of each Partnership and
without any action on the part of Pioneer USA or the other partners of the
Partnership, each partnership interest outstanding immediately prior thereto
shall be converted into the right to receive an amount of Pioneer Parent Common
Stock allocated to the Partnership, which amount shall be determined in
accordance with the merger value assigned to the Partnership pursuant to the
procedures set forth herein and in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus (as defined in
Section 4.3) and the procedures set forth in the Partnership's partnership
agreement for allocating liquidation distributions as though the assets of the
Partnership were sold for the merger value of the Partnership. The merger value
for each Partnership is equal to the sum
F-2
of the present value of estimated future net revenues from the Partnership's
estimated oil and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of
March 31, 2001 and determined as described in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated expenses
and fees of the mergers of all of the Partnerships and less the cash
distribution mailed on July 13, 2001, by the Partnership to its partners. The
merger value for each Partnership will not be adjusted as of the Closing Date.
The number of shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock to be issued for each
partnership interest of each Partnership will be based on (i) the Partnership's
merger value divided by (ii) the average closing price of the Pioneer Parent
Common Stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, for the ten trading
days ending three business days before the initial date scheduled for the
special meeting for the Partnership. For purposes of illustration in the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA shall calculate the
aggregate number of shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock to be offered based on
$18.00 per share of Pioneer Parent Common Stock. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA
shall update the aggregate number of shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock to be
issued based on the average closing price as described in clause (ii) above
before the date of the special meeting for each Partnership. The merger value
assigned to each Partnership and the amount of Pioneer Parent Common Stock
offered with respect to each $1,000 investment by the limited partners in the
Partnership pursuant to the merger of the Partnership are set forth in the table
entitled "Summary Table -- Merger Value and Amount of Initial Limited Partner
Investment Repaid" in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
(b) All partnership interests of each Partnership, when converted into the
right to receive Pioneer Parent Common Stock, shall no longer be outstanding and
shall automatically be cancelled and retired and shall cease to exist, and each
holder of a certificate representing any such partnership interests shall cease
to have any rights with respect thereto, except the right to receive the amount
of Pioneer Parent Common Stock to be delivered in consideration therefor.
(c) The partnership interests, whether general or limited, in each
Partnership held directly or indirectly by Pioneer USA shall be cancelled
without any consideration being received therefor; provided, however, that as a
result of the merger of each Partnership, Pioneer USA will own 100% of the
properties of the Partnership, including properties attributable to its
partnership interests in the Partnership.
(d) No fractional shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock will be issued.
Each fractional share of Pioneer Parent Common Stock to be issued to a partner
of a Partnership will be rounded up to the nearest whole share.
(e) When any person has partnership interests in more than one Partnership
that merges with Pioneer USA, Pioneer USA and Pioneer Parent may, at their sole
discretion, aggregate the number of shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock to be
issued to that person before making the rounding and other adjustments provided
in the preceding clause (d).
(f) If any limited partner is indebted to Pioneer USA for any portion of
the limited partner's original investment in the Partnership, Pioneer USA plans
to apply the Pioneer Parent Common Stock that would otherwise be distributed to
the limited partner upon completion of the merger of the Partnership against
that limited partner's indebtedness. If a limited partner's indebtedness to
Pioneer USA is less than the merger value allocated to limited partnership
interests held by the limited partner, the limited partner shall receive Pioneer
Parent Common Stock equal to the amount by which such merger value exceeds such
indebtedness. If a limited partner's indebtedness to Pioneer USA is greater than
the merger value allocated to the limited partnership interests held by the
limited partner, Pioneer USA may collect the deficiency from the limited
partner.
(g) To the extent that Pioneer USA or a Partnership is required to withhold
and pay over, or otherwise pay, any withholding or other tax (the "Required
Withholding") with respect to a partner or former partner in a Partnership (the
"Withholding Partner") as a result of the Withholding Partner's current or
former participation in the Partnership, Pioneer USA or the Partnership shall be
entitled to deduct and withhold (or cause to be deducted and withheld) the
Required Holding from the merger consideration (including the Pioneer Parent
Common Stock) otherwise payable to the Withholding Partner. In the event Pioneer
USA or a Partnership withholds Pioneer Parent Common Stock in order to satisfy
the Required Withholding with respect to a Withholding Partner, Pioneer USA or
the Partnership, as appropriate, may, in its sole discretion, (i) sell such
Pioneer Parent Common Stock and use the proceeds therefrom to satisfy the
Required Withholding, (ii) hold such Pioneer Parent Common Stock as security for
the satisfaction of the Required Withholding by the Withholding Partner, in
which case the Pioneer Parent Common Stock shall be released to the Withholding
Partner upon the full satisfaction of the Required Withholding by the
Withholding Partner, or (iii) take such other reasonable action as is required
or appropriate to satisfy the Required Withholding at the sole expense of the
Withholding Partner. To the extent that amounts are so withheld or deducted (or
caused to be withheld or deducted) by Pioneer USA or a Partnership, such amounts
shall be treated for all purposes of this Merger Agreement as having been paid
to the Withholding Partner.
F-3
1.3 Closing. The closing of the merger of each Partnership (the
"Closing") shall take place at the offices of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., 3700
Trammell Crow Center, 2001 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75201, as soon as
practicable after the fulfillment of the conditions referred to in Article 3, or
at such other time and place as the parties shall agree (the date of such
Closing being the "Closing Date").
1.4 Effective Time of Merger of Each Partnership. Upon satisfaction of
the conditions set forth in Article 3 hereof and as soon as practicable after
the Closing, this Merger Agreement, or a certificate of merger setting forth the
information required by, and otherwise in compliance with, Section 263 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL") and, if
applicable, Section 17-211 of the Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act of the
State of Delaware (the "DRULPA") with respect to the merger of each Partnership,
shall be delivered for filing with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware. At such time, if applicable, a certificate of merger with respect to
the merger of each Partnership setting forth the information required by, and
otherwise in compliance with, Section 2.11 the Revised Limited Partnership Act
of the State of Texas (the "TRLPA") shall be delivered for filing with the
Secretary of State of the State of Texas. The merger of each Partnership shall
become effective upon the later of (a) the day and at the time the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware files this Merger Agreement or such certificate
of merger in compliance with Section 263 of the DGCL and, if applicable, Section
17-211 of the DRULPA, and (b) if applicable, the day and at the time the
Secretary of State of the State of Texas files such certificate of merger in
compliance with Section 2.11 of the TRLPA (the time of such effectiveness is
herein called the "Effective Time"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, by action of
its board of directors, either Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA, in its individual
capacity or as the sole general partner of each Partnership, may terminate this
Merger Agreement at any time prior to the earlier of (a) the filing of this
Merger Agreement or the certificate of merger with respect to the merger of the
Partnership in compliance with Section 263 of the DGCL and, if applicable,
Section 17-211 of the DRULPA with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware and (b) if applicable, the filing of the certificate of merger with
respect to the merger of the Partnership in compliance with Section 2.11 of the
TRLPA with Secretary of State of the State of Texas.
1.5 Effect of Merger of Each Partnership. At the Effective Time of the
merger of each Partnership, Pioneer USA, without further action, as provided by
the laws of the State of Delaware and the State of Texas, as the case may be,
shall succeed to and possess all the rights, privileges, powers, and franchises,
of a public as well as of a private nature, of the Partnership; and all
property, real, personal and mixed, and all debts due on whatsoever account,
including subscriptions to shares, and all other choses in action, and all and
every other interest, of or belonging to or due to the Partnership shall be
deemed to be vested in Pioneer USA without further act or deed; and the title to
any real estate, or any interest therein, vested in Pioneer USA or the
Partnership shall not revert or be in any way impaired by reason of the merger
of the Partnership. Such transfer to and vesting in Pioneer USA shall be deemed
to occur by operation of law, and no consent or approval of any other person
shall be required in connection with any such transfer or vesting unless such
consent or approval is specifically required in the event of merger or
consolidation by law or express provision in any contract, agreement, decree,
order, or other instrument to which Pioneer USA or the Partnership is a party or
by which either of them is bound. At and after the Effective Time, Pioneer USA
shall be responsible and liable for all debts, liabilities, and duties of each
Partnership, including franchise taxes, if any, which may be enforced against
Pioneer USA to the same extent as if said debts, liabilities, and duties had
been incurred or contracted by it. Neither the rights of creditors nor any liens
upon the property of any Partnership or Pioneer USA shall be impaired by the
merger of any Partnership.
1.6 Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws. The certificate of
incorporation of Pioneer USA before the merger of each Partnership shall be and
remain the certificate of incorporation of Pioneer USA after the Effective Time,
until the same shall thereafter be altered, amended, or repealed in accordance
with law and Pioneer USA's certificate of incorporation. The bylaws of Pioneer
USA as in effect at the Effective Time shall be and remain the bylaws of Pioneer
USA, as the surviving corporation, until the same shall thereafter be altered,
amended, or repealed in accordance with law, Pioneer USA's certificate of
incorporation or such bylaws.
1.7 Pioneer USA Common Stock. At the Effective Time, each outstanding
share of common stock of Pioneer USA shall remain outstanding and shall continue
to represent one share of common stock of Pioneer USA.
1.8 Officers and Directors. At the Effective Time, each of the persons
who was serving as an officer of Pioneer USA immediately prior to the Effective
Time shall continue to be an officer of Pioneer USA and shall continue to serve
in such capacity at the pleasure of the board of directors of Pioneer USA or, if
earlier, until their respective death or resignation. At the Effective Time,
each of the persons who was serving as a director of Pioneer USA immediately
prior to the Effective Time shall continue to be a director of Pioneer USA, and
each shall serve in such capacity until the next annual meeting of stockholders
of Pioneer USA and until his or her successor is elected and qualified or, if
earlier, until his death, resignation, or removal from office.
F-4
1.9 Exchange of Partnership Interests for Pioneer Parent Common Stock.
(a) Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company shall act as the transfer
and exchange agent (in such capacity, the "Transfer Agent") in connection with
the issuance of certificates representing shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock
pursuant to Section 1.2.
(b) The Transfer Agent shall mail certificates representing shares of
Pioneer Parent Common Stock to the partners of record, other than Pioneer USA,
of each Partnership promptly following the Closing Date in payment of the merger
consideration. Limited partners and Nonmanaging General Partners of each
Partnership will not be required to surrender partnership interest certificates
to receive the Pioneer Parent Common Stock.
(c) If any certificate representing shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock
is to be issued in a name other than that in which the limited partnership
interests cancelled in exchange therefor are registered, it shall be a condition
of the issuance thereof that the person requesting such exchange shall pay to
the Transfer Agent any transfer or other taxes required by reason of the
issuance of a certificate representing shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock in
any name other than that of the registered holder of the cancelled limited
partnership interests, or otherwise required, or shall establish to the
satisfaction of the Transfer Agent that such tax has been paid or is not
payable.
(d) After the Closing Date, there shall not be any further registration of
transfers on the transfer books of any Partnership of the partnership interests
that were issued and outstanding immediately before the Closing Date and were
converted into the right to receive Pioneer Parent Common Stock. If, after the
Closing Date, certificates representing partnership interests of a Partnership
are presented, they shall be exchanged for Pioneer Parent Common Stock, all as
provided in this Article.
ARTICLE 2
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
2.1 Representations and Warranties of Each Partnership. Each Partnership
hereby represents and warrants to Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA as follows:
(a) Formation; Qualification. The Partnership is a limited
partnership duly formed under the DRULPA or TRLPA, as applicable, and is
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of
Delaware or the State of Texas, as applicable. The Partnership has all
requisite partnership power and authority to own, operate or lease its
properties and to carry on its business as now being conducted. The
Partnership is duly qualified to do business as a foreign limited
partnership and is in good standing in each jurisdiction where the
character of its properties owned, operated or leased, or the nature of its
activities, makes such qualifications necessary.
(b) Capitalization. All of the outstanding partnership interests of
the Partnership are free of all liens, encumbrances, defects and preemptive
rights and are fully paid. Except as described in the Proxy Statement/
Prospectus, there are no outstanding subscriptions, options or other
arrangements or commitments obligating the Partnership to issue any
additional partnership interests.
(c) No Conflicts. Assuming this Merger Agreement is approved by the
requisite vote of the limited partners of the Partnership (with respect to
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd., Parker & Parsley
Private Investment 85-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private
Investment, Ltd., Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd., Parker &
Parsley 91-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. (each, a "Special Vote
Partnership"), excluding Pioneer USA and its affiliates), consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby and compliance with the terms and
provisions of this Merger Agreement will not conflict with, result in a
breach of, require notice under or constitute a default under (i) its
certificate of limited partnership or partnership agreement, (ii) any
material judgment, order, injunction, decree or ruling of any court or
governmental authority or (iii) any material agreement, indenture or
instrument to which the Partnership is a party.
(d) Authority, Authorization and Enforceability. The Partnership has
all requisite power and authority to enter into and perform the provisions
of this Merger Agreement. The execution and delivery of this Merger
Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have
been duly authorized by all necessary partnership action on the part of the
Partnership other than the approval of its limited partners (with respect
to each Special Vote Partnership, excluding Pioneer USA and its
affiliates). Subject to such approval, this Merger Agreement has been duly
executed and delivered by the Partnership and constitutes a valid and
binding obligation of the Partnership enforceable in accordance with its
terms.
F-5
(e) SEC Reports; Financial Statements.
(i) With respect to each of Reporting Partnership (as defined
below), the Partnership's (A) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000, (B) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2001, and (C) all other reports or registration
statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"SEC") since December 31, 2000 (collectively, the "Partnership's SEC
Reports") (1) were prepared in accordance with the applicable
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), and (2) as
of their respective dates, did not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the
light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading.
(ii) Each of the financial statements of the Partnership for the
year ended December 31, 2000 and for the six months ended June 30,
2001 contained in the Partnership's supplement to the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus and, with respect to each Reporting Partnership,
in the Partnership's SEC Reports has been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis
throughout the periods involved (except as may be indicated in the
notes thereto) and each fairly presents the financial position of the
Partnership as of the respective dates thereof and the results of
operations and cash flows of the Partnership for the periods
indicated, except that the unaudited interim financial statements are
subject to normal and recurring year-end adjustments that are not
expected to be material in amount.
(iii) For purposes hereof, the term "Reporting Partnership"
means: Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd.,
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd., Parker &
Parsley 84-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley
85-B, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.,
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd., Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd., Parker &
Parsley 87-B, Ltd., Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.,
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd., Parker & Parsley
88-A, L.P., Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P., Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P., Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P., Parker & Parsley
90-A L.P., Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P., Parker & Parsley 90-B,
L.P., Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P., Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.,
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. and Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.
(f) No Material Adverse Change. Since June 30, 2001, the Partnership
has conducted its operations in the ordinary and usual course of business
and has paid all of its obligations as they have become due; and the
business of the Partnership has not undergone any material adverse change
since such date.
(g) Accuracy of Information. None of the information supplied or to
be supplied by the Partnership for inclusion in the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus, as amended or supplemented, will, at the time of the
mailing of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, the time of the special meeting
of the limited partners of the Partnership (each, a "Special Meeting") or
the Closing Date, be false or misleading with respect to any material fact,
contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state any material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading.
2.2 Representations and Warranties of Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA hereby
represents and warrants to Pioneer Parent and each Partnership as follows:
(a) Organization; Qualification. Pioneer USA is a corporation duly
formed under the DGCL and is validly existing and in good standing under
the laws of the State of Delaware. Pioneer USA has all requisite corporate
power and authority to own, operate or lease its properties and to carry on
its business as now being conducted. Pioneer USA is duly qualified to do
business as a foreign corporation and is in good standing in each
jurisdiction where the character of its properties owned, operated or
leased, or the nature of its activities, makes such qualifications
necessary.
(b) No Conflicts. Consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby and compliance with the terms and provisions of this Merger
Agreement will not conflict with, result in a breach of, require notice
under or constitute a default under (i) its certificate of incorporation or
bylaws, (ii) any material judgment, order, injunction, decree or ruling of
any court or governmental authority or (iii) any material agreement,
indenture or instrument to which Pioneer USA is a party.
(c) Authority, Authorization and Enforceability. Pioneer USA has all
requisite corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Merger
Agreement and to perform the provisions of this Merger Agreement. The
F-6
execution and delivery of this Merger Agreement and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on the part of Pioneer USA. This Merger Agreement has been
duly executed and delivered by Pioneer USA and constitutes a valid and
binding obligation of Pioneer USA enforceable in accordance with its terms.
(d) No Material Adverse Change. Since June 30, 2001, Pioneer USA has
conducted its operations in the ordinary and usual course of business and
has paid all of its obligations as they have become due; and the business
of Pioneer USA has not undergone any material adverse change since such
date.
(e) Accuracy of Information. None of the information supplied or to
be supplied by Pioneer USA for inclusion in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
as amended or supplemented, will, at the time of the mailing of the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus, the time of the Special Meeting of each Partnership
or the Closing Date, be false or misleading with respect to any material
fact, contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make
the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they
were made, not misleading.
(f) Capacity as General Partner. Pioneer USA is the sole or managing
general partner of each Partnership and is the sole general partner of each
Nonmanaging General Partner.
2.3 Representations and Warranties of Pioneer Parent. Pioneer Parent
hereby represents and warrants to Pioneer USA and each Partnership as follows:
(a) Organization; Qualification. Pioneer Parent is a corporation duly
formed under the DGCL and is validly existing and in good standing under
the laws of the State of Delaware. Pioneer Parent has all requisite
corporate power and authority to own, operate or lease its properties and
to carry on its business as now being conducted. Pioneer Parent is duly
qualified to do business as a foreign corporation and is in good standing
in each jurisdiction where the character of its properties owned, operated
or leased, or the nature of its activities, makes such qualifications
necessary.
(b) No Conflicts. Consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby and compliance with the terms and provisions of this Merger
Agreement will not conflict with, result in a breach of, require notice
under or constitute a default under (i) its certificate of incorporation or
bylaws, (ii) any material judgment, order, injunction, decree or ruling of
any court or governmental authority or (iii) any material agreement,
indenture or instrument to which Pioneer Parent is a party.
(c) Authority, Authorization and Enforceability. Pioneer Parent has
all requisite corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this
Merger Agreement and to perform the provisions of this Merger Agreement.
The execution and delivery of this Merger Agreement and the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all
necessary corporate action on the part of Pioneer Parent. This Merger
Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by Pioneer Parent and
constitutes a valid and binding obligation of Pioneer Parent enforceable in
accordance with its terms. When issued in accordance with this Merger
Agreement, the shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock will be validly
issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not subject to preemptive rights.
(d) SEC Reports; Financial Statements.
(i) Pioneer Parent's (A) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000, (B) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2001, and (C) all other reports or registration
statements filed with the SEC since December 31, 2000 (collectively,
"Pioneer Parent's SEC Reports") (1) were prepared in accordance with
the applicable requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange
Act, and (2) as of their respective dates, did not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required
to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made,
not misleading.
(ii) Each of the financial statements of Pioneer Parent for the
year ended December 31, 2000 and for the six months ended June 30,
2001 contained in Pioneer Parent's SEC Reports has been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a
consistent basis throughout the periods involved (except as may be
indicated in the notes thereto) and each fairly presents the financial
position of Pioneer Parent as of the respective dates thereof and the
results of operations and cash flows of Pioneer Parent for the periods
indicated, except that the unaudited interim financial statements are
subject to normal and recurring year-end adjustments that are not
expected to be material in amount. F-7
(e) No Material Adverse Change. Since June 30, 2001, Pioneer Parent
has conducted its operations in the ordinary and usual course of business
and has paid all of its obligations as they have become due; and the
business of Pioneer Parent has not undergone any material adverse change
since such date.
(f) Accuracy of Information. None of the information supplied or to
be supplied by Pioneer Parent for inclusion in the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus, as amended or supplemented, will, at the time of the
mailing of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, the time of the Special Meeting
of each Partnership or the Closing Date, be false or misleading with
respect to any material fact, contain any untrue statement of material fact
or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
ARTICLE 3
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO THE MERGER OF EACH PARTNERSHIP
3.1 Conditions to Each Party's Obligations to Effect the Merger of Each
Partnership. The respective obligations of each party to effect the merger of
each Partnership shall be subject to the fulfillment (or waiver in whole or in
part by the intended beneficiary thereof in its sole discretion) at or prior to
the Closing Date of the following conditions:
(a) This Merger Agreement, an amendment to the partnership agreement
of each Partnership to permit the merger of such Partnership (the "Merger
Amendment"), the selection of special counsel for the limited partners and
that counsel's legal opinion referred to in Section 3.1(c) shall have been
approved by the limited partners (with respect to each Special Vote
Partnership, excluding Pioneer USA and its affiliates) holding at least a
majority (or, with respect to each Super-Majority Partnership, at least
66 2/3%) of the outstanding limited partnership interests voting in person
or by proxy at the Special Meetings at which a quorum is present, with
respect to each merger.
(b) Pioneer USA shall have received from Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc.
a written opinion for inclusion in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus
satisfactory in form and substance to Pioneer USA and substantially to the
effect that, as of the date of that opinion, the merger value for each
Partnership and the allocation of the merger value of the Partnership (1)
to the limited partners of the Partnership as a group, (2) to the general
partners of the Partnership as a group, (3) to Pioneer USA as the managing
or sole general partner of the Partnership, (4) to the unaffiliated limited
partners of the Partnership as a group and (5) to the unaffiliated limited
partners of the Nonmanaging General Partner, if any, of the Partnership as
a group, is fair to the unaffiliated limited partners of the Partnership
and the unaffiliated limited partners of the Nonmanaging General Partner,
if any, of the Partnership, from a financial point of view. Such opinion
shall not have been withdrawn prior to the Closing Date, unless a
replacement opinion or opinions of an investment banking firm or firms
satisfactory to Pioneer USA to a similar effect has been received by
Pioneer USA and has not been withdrawn.
(c) The receipt, on or prior to the Closing Date, by Pioneer USA of
the opinion of special legal counsel for the limited partners pursuant to
the partnership agreement of each Partnership.
(d) No provision of any applicable law or regulation and no judgment,
injunction, order or decree shall prohibit the consummation of the merger
of any Partnership and the transactions related thereto.
(e) No suit, action or proceeding shall have been filed or otherwise
be pending against Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA or any officer, director or
affiliate of Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA challenging the legality or any
aspect of the merger of any Partnership or the transactions related
thereto.
(f) The shares of Pioneer Parent Common Stock issuable upon the merger
of each Partnership pursuant to this Merger Agreement shall have been
authorized for listing on the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock
Exchange upon official notice of issuance.
(g) The parties to the merger of each Partnership having made all
filings and registrations with, and notifications to, all third parties,
including, without limitation, lenders and all appropriate regulatory
authorities, required for consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Merger Agreement (other than the filing and recordation of appropriate
merger documents required by the DGCL, the DRULPA and the TRLPA, as
applicable), and all approvals and authorizations and consents of all third
parties, including, without limitation, lenders and all regulatory
authorities, required for consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Merger Agreement shall have been received and shall be in full force
and effect, except for such filings, registrations, notifications,
approvals, authorizations and consents, the failure of which to make or
obtain would not have a material adverse effect on the business or
financial condition of Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA or any Partnership.
F-8
(h) The absence of any opinion of counsel that the exercise by the
limited partners of any Partnership of the right to approve the merger of
such Partnership is not permitted under applicable state law.
3.2 Conditions to Obligations of Pioneer Parent to Effect the Merger of
Each Partnership. The obligations of Pioneer Parent to effect the merger of
each Partnership shall be subject to the fulfillment (or waiver in whole or in
part by the intended beneficiary thereof in its sole discretion), at or prior to
the Closing Date, of the following additional conditions:
(a) Pioneer USA and each Partnership shall have performed in all
material respects their respective agreements contained in this Merger
Agreement required to be performed at or prior to the Closing Date.
(b) The representations and warranties of Pioneer USA and each
Partnership contained in this Merger Agreement shall be true and correct in
all material respects at and as of the Closing Date as if made at and as of
such time unless they relate to another specified time.
3.3 Conditions to Obligations of Pioneer USA and Each Partnership to
Effect the Merger of Such Partnership. The obligations of Pioneer USA and each
Partnership to effect the merger of such Partnership shall be subject to the
fulfillment (or waiver in whole or in part by the intended beneficiary thereof
in its sole discretion) at or prior to the Closing Date of the following
additional conditions:
(a) Pioneer Parent shall have performed in all material respects its
agreements contained in this Merger Agreement required to be performed at
or prior to the Closing Date.
(b) The representations and warranties of Pioneer Parent contained in
this Merger Agreement shall be true and correct in all material respects at
and as of the Closing Date as if made at and as of such time unless they
relate to another specific time.
ARTICLE 4
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
4.1 Conduct of Business Pending the Merger of Each Partnership. Each
Partnership covenants and agrees that, between the date of this Merger Agreement
and the Closing Date, unless the other parties shall otherwise agree in writing
or as otherwise contemplated in this Merger Agreement, it shall conduct its
businesses only in the ordinary course of business and in a manner consistent
with past practice, and it shall not take any action except for actions
consistent with such practice, and it shall not make any distributions to its
partners. Each Partnership shall use its reasonable best efforts to preserve
intact its business organization, to keep available the services of its present
officers, employees and consultants, and to preserve its relationships with
customers, suppliers and other persons with which it has significant business
dealings.
4.2 Special Meetings; Proxies. As soon as reasonably practicable after
the execution of this Merger Agreement, Pioneer USA will take all action
necessary to duly call, give notice of, convene and hold the Special Meetings to
consider and vote upon approval of this Merger Agreement, the Merger Amendment,
the selection of special legal counsel for the limited partners, that counsel's
legal opinion referred to in Section 3.1(c) and the transactions contemplated
hereby and thereby. Pioneer USA will use its reasonable best efforts to solicit
from the limited partners proxies in favor of this Merger Agreement, the Merger
Amendment, the selection of special legal counsel for the limited partners, that
counsel's legal opinion referred to in Section 3.1(c) and the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby, and to take all other action necessary or
advisable to secure any vote or consent of the limited partners of each
Partnership required by the partnership agreement of the Partnership or this
Merger Agreement or applicable law to effect the merger of the Partnership.
4.3 Proxy Statement/Prospectus. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA shall file
with the SEC a registration statement that includes a preliminary proxy
statement/prospectus for each Special Meeting (the definitive form of such proxy
statement/prospectus is referred to as the "Proxy Statement/Prospectus").
Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA shall use all reasonable commercial efforts to
have the registration statement declared effective by the SEC as promptly as
practicable. Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA shall cause the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus to be mailed to the limited partners of each Partnership as
soon as practicable thereafter in accordance with applicable federal and state
law.
4.4 Authorization for Shares and Stock Exchange Listing. Prior to the
Effective Time, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA shall have taken all action
necessary to permit Pioneer Parent to issue the number of shares of Pioneer
Parent Common Stock required to be issued pursuant to this Merger Agreement.
Each of Pioneer Parent and
F-9
Pioneer USA shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause the shares of
Pioneer Parent Common Stock to be issued in the merger of each Partnership to be
approved for listing on the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock
Exchange, subject to official notice of issuance, prior to the Closing Date.
4.5 Additional Agreements. Subject to the terms and conditions herein
provided, each of the parties hereto agrees to use all reasonable commercial
efforts to obtain in a timely manner all necessary waivers, consents and
approvals and to effect all necessary registrations and filings, and to use all
reasonable commercial efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all other actions
and to do, or cause to be done, all other things necessary, proper or advisable
under applicable laws and regulations to consummate and make effective as
promptly as practicable the transactions contemplated by this Merger Agreement.
ARTICLE 5
TERMINATION
5.1 Termination. This Merger Agreement may be terminated and the merger
of any Partnership contemplated hereby may be abandoned, in whole or in part, at
any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after approval of the
merger of the Partnership by its limited partners (with respect to each Special
Vote Partnership, excluding Pioneer USA and its affiliates):
(a) By mutual written consent of the parties;
(b) By any party, if:
(i) there shall be any applicable law, rule or regulation that
makes consummation of the merger of any Partnership illegal or
otherwise prohibited or if any judgment, injunction, order or decree
enjoining any party from consummating the merger of any Partnership is
entered and such judgment, injunction, order or decree shall have
become final and non-appealable;
(ii) at the Special Meeting of each Partnership or at any
adjournment or postponement thereof, the approval of the limited
partners of the Partnership referred to in Section 3.1(a) shall not
have been obtained by reason of the failure to obtain the requisite
vote; or
(iii) there shall be any pending suit, action or proceeding filed
against Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, any Partnership or any officer,
director or affiliate of Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA challenging the
legality or any aspect of the merger of any Partnership or the
transactions related thereto;
(c) By Pioneer Parent, if either Pioneer USA or any Partnership shall
have failed to perform its agreements and covenants contained herein, which
failure has a material adverse effect on Pioneer USA or such Partnership,
as the case may be, or materially and adversely affects the transactions
contemplated by this Merger Agreement;
(d) By Pioneer USA or any Partnership with respect to the
Partnership's merger, if Pioneer Parent shall have failed to perform its
agreements and covenants contained herein, which failure has a material
adverse effect on Pioneer USA or such Partnership, as the case may be, or
materially and adversely affects the transactions contemplated by this
Merger Agreement;
(e) By Pioneer Parent or Pioneer USA, pursuant to Section 1.4 hereof;
(f) By Pioneer USA, if Pioneer USA, after considering the written
advice of outside legal counsel, determines in good faith that termination
of this Merger Agreement is required for Pioneer USA's board of directors
to comply with its fiduciary duties to its sole stockholder or to any
Partnership imposed by applicable law; or
(g) By Pioneer Parent, if there shall have occurred any event,
circumstance, condition, development or occurrence causing, resulting in or
having, or reasonably expected to cause, result in or have, a material
adverse effect (i) on any Partnership's business, operations, properties
(taken as a whole), condition (financial or otherwise), results of
operations, assets (taken as a whole), liabilities, cash flows or
prospects, (ii) on market prices for oil and gas prevailing generally in
the oil and gas industry since the date of determination of the oil and gas
commodity prices used in the determination of the merger value for each
Partnership, (iii) on the price of Pioneer Parent Common Stock or (iv) on
the oil and gas industry generally.
5.2 Effect of Termination. In the event of termination of this Merger
Agreement by a party as provided in Section 5.1, written notice thereof shall
promptly be given to the other parties and this Merger Agreement shall forthwith
F-10
terminate without further action by any of the parties hereto. If this Merger
Agreement is terminated as so provided, there shall be no liabilities or
obligations hereunder on the part of any party hereto except as provided in
Section 6.13 and except that nothing herein shall relieve any party hereto from
liability for any breach of this Merger Agreement.
ARTICLE 6
MISCELLANEOUS
6.1 Headings. The headings contained in this Merger Agreement are for
reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or
interpretation of this Merger Agreement.
6.2 Amendment. This Merger Agreement may be supplemented, amended or
modified by an instrument in writing signed by Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA
(on behalf of itself and as (a) the sole or managing general partner of each
Partnership, (b) the sole general partner of each Nonmanaging General Partner
and (c) attorney-in-fact for the limited partners of each Partnership) at any
time prior to the Closing Date; provided, however, that after approval by the
limited partners of each Partnership (with respect to each Special Vote
Partnership, excluding Pioneer USA and its affiliates) of this Merger Agreement,
the Merger Amendment, the selection of special legal counsel for the limited
partners and that counsel's legal opinion referred to in Section 3.1(c), no
amendment may be made which would adversely change the type or amount of, or the
method for determining, the consideration to be received upon consummation of
the merger of each Partnership or which would in any other way materially and
adversely affect the rights of such limited partners (other than a termination
of this Merger Agreement or abandonment of the merger of any Partnership).
6.3 Waiver. At any time prior to the Closing Date, the parties hereto may
(a) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts
of the other parties hereto, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations
and warranties contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto,
and (c) waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions contained
herein. Any such extension or waiver shall not operate as an extension or waiver
of, or estoppel with respect to, any subsequent failure of compliance or other
failure. Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any such extension or
waiver shall be valid against such party if set forth in an instrument in
writing signed by such party.
6.4 Expiration of Representations and Warranties. All representations and
warranties made pursuant to this Merger Agreement shall expire with, and be
terminated and extinguished by, the merger of each Partnership on the Closing
Date.
6.5 Notices. All notices and other communications to be given or made
hereunder by any party shall be delivered by first class mail, or by personal
delivery, postage or fees prepaid, (a) to Pioneer Parent at 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attn: Scott D. Sheffield, with a
copy to Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., 3700 Trammell Crow Center, 2001 Ross Avenue,
Dallas, Texas 75201, Attn: Robert L. Kimball, and (b) to the other parties at
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400,
Irving, Texas 75039, Attn: Mark L. Withrow, with a copy to Sayles, Lidji &
Werbner, 4400 Renaissance Tower, 1201 Elm Street, Dallas, Texas 75270, Attn:
Brian M. Lidji.
6.6 Counterparts. This Merger Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
6.7 Severability. If any term or other provision of this Merger Agreement
is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law or public
policy, all other conditions and provisions of this Merger Agreement shall
nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal
substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner
materially adverse to any party.
6.8 Entire Agreement. This Merger Agreement, including the documents and
instruments referred to herein, constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes
all other prior agreements and undertakings, both written and oral, between the
parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter hereof.
6.9 Remedies. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Merger
Agreement is not intended to confer upon any other person any rights or remedies
hereunder.
6.10 Assignment. This Merger Agreement shall not be assigned by operation
of law or otherwise without the consent of all parties hereto.
6.11 No Implied Waiver. Except as expressly provided in this Merger
Agreement, no course of dealing among the parties hereto and no delay by any of
them in exercising any right, power or remedy conferred herein or now or
hereafter
F-11
existing at law or in equity, by statute or otherwise, shall operate as a waiver
of, or otherwise prejudice, any such right, power or remedy.
6.12 Governing Law. Except to the extent that TRLPA is mandatorily
applicable, this Merger Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware (regardless of the laws that
might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflicts of law) as to
all matters.
6.13 Expenses. Except as otherwise provided herein, to the extent the
merger of a Partnership is completed, that participating Partnership shall pay
its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the aggregate estimated
expenses and fees to be incurred in connection with the merger of each
Partnership with and into Pioneer USA. Pioneer Parent shall pay (a) the
estimated expenses and fees otherwise allocable to any nonparticipating
Partnership and (2) any expenses and fees actually incurred in excess of $2.0
million. In addition, if Pioneer Parent terminates this Merger Agreement or
abandons the merger of any Partnership pursuant to Section 5.1, Pioneer Parent
shall pay all estimated expenses and fees of such Partnership incurred in
connection with the merger of such Partnership before such termination or
abandonment.
6.14 Liquidation. Each Partnership, Pioneer Parent and Pioneer USA intend
and agree that the merger of each Partnership shall be treated as a liquidation
of the Partnership into Pioneer USA pursuant to Section 332 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and shall make all declarations and filings
necessary to accomplish such intent and liquidation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Merger
Agreement as of the date first written above.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
---------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
By: /s/ Mark L. Withrow
---------------------------------------
Mark L. Withrow
Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
F-12
PARTNERSHIPS:
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-A , Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd.
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
as the sole or managing general
partner of each Partnership
By: /s/ Mark L. Withrow
------------------------------------
Mark L. Withrow
Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
as the sole general partner of each
Nonmanaging General Partner
By: /s/ Mark L. Withrow
------------------------------------
Mark L. Withrow
Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
as attorney-in-fact for the limited
partners of each Partnership
By: /s/ Mark L. Withrow
------------------------------------
Mark L. Withrow
Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
F-13
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker &
Parsley 81-I, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October
12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 81-I, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through July
31, 2001
- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly distributions
including the distribution in July 2001
- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of
June 30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in year
of initial investment
o Information about:
- the legal opinion for the limited partners
- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended
December 31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 7,410
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 4,869
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 654
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 93.68
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for 3.63 times
the past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 25.01
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 20.30
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 85.33
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 90.88
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 320
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated
oil and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of
March 31, 2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of
the estimated expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the
partnerships and less the cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the
partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You
should not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the
same as the value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum
of (A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's
reserves during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated
residual value from the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at
the end of the operating period, in each case using the same pricing
and discount rate as in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A)
partnership level general and administrative expenses, and (B) the cash
distribution on July 13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation
expenses which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro
rata share of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b)
above and (B) 3% of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash
distribution on July 13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The
liquidation expenses represent the estimated costs to retain an
investment banker or broker to sell the assets of the partnership and
the legal and other closing costs associated with such transaction,
including the wind-down costs of the partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss
to offset your other income may have been subject to certain
limitations at your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to
consult your tax advisor to determine the additional value, if any,
actually realized by you in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special
legal counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA
that (1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger
of the partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal
income tax classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and
(2) neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership shall continue until terminated in
accordance with the applicable provisions of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 102,047 $ 38,546
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 50,689 63,269
---------- ----------
Total current assets 152,736 101,815
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,245,897 5,245,144
Accumulated depletion (5,146,166) (5,142,190)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 99,731 102,954
---------- ----------
$ 252,467 $ 204,769
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 9,658 $ 8,817
Partners' capital:
General partners 57,505 45,564
Limited partners (1,482 interests) 185,304 150,388
---------- ----------
242,809 195,952
---------- ----------
$ 252,467 $ 204,769
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 103,562 $ 97,018 $ 211,753 $ 191,199
Interest 719 795 1,438 1,358
-------- -------- -------- --------
104,281 97,813 213,191 192,557
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 40,997 44,490 85,961 85,156
General and administrative 3,109 3,731 7,966 6,652
Depletion 2,085 2,067 3,976 3,685
-------- -------- -------- --------
46,191 50,288 97,903 95,493
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 58,090 $ 47,525 $ 115,288 $ 97,064
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
General partners $ 14,835 $ 12,191 $ 29,163 $ 24,819
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 43,255 $ 35,334 $ 86,125 $ 72,245
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 29.18 $ 23.84 $ 58.11 $ 48.75
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
General Limited
partners partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 45,564 $ 150,388 $ 195,952
Distributions (17,222) (51,209) (68,431)
Net income 29,163 86,125 115,288
-------- -------- --------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 57,505 $ 185,304 $ 242,809
======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 115,288 $ 97,064
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 3,976 3,685
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 12,580 (12,389)
Accounts payable 841 843
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 132,685 89,203
-------- --------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (753) (4,475)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (68,431) (96,204)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 63,501 (11,476)
Cash at beginning of period 38,546 38,716
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 102,047 $ 27,240
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1981 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended
June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 11% to $211,753 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $191,199 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 4,203 barrels
of oil, 2,165 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 12,725 mcf of gas were
sold, or 8,489 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June
30, 2000, 4,524 barrels of oil, 2,512 barrels of NGLs and 12,333 mcf of gas were
sold, or 9,092 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.40, or 1%, from $27.49
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.89 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.43, or 10%, from
$13.83 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.26 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 86% from $2.60
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.83 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
6
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $97,903 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $95,493 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $2,410,
or 3%. This increase was due to increases in general and administrative expenses
("G&A"), production costs and depletion.
Production costs were $85,961 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and $85,156
for the same period in 2000 resulting in an $805 increase, or 1%. The increase
was due to increased production taxes due to higher oil and gas prices, offset
by less well maintenance costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
20% from $6,652 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $7,966 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $3,976 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$3,685 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $291, or 8%. This increase
was the result of a decline in proved reserves during the period ended June 30,
2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of 321
barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in
2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 7% to $103,562 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $97,018 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs and an increase in production, offset by a decline in the average price
received for oil. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 2,046 barrels of
oil, 1,395 barrels of NGLs and 7,163 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,635 BOEs. For
the three months ended June 30, 2000, 2,122 barrels of oil, 1,295 barrels of
NGLs and 6,231 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,456 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.67, or 2%, from $27.86
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.19 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.32, or
10%, from $13.13 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.45 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 16% to
$3.88 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $3.35 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $46,191 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $50,288 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$4,097, or 8%. This decrease was due to declines in production costs and G&A,
offset by an increase in depletion.
Production costs were $40,997 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$44,490 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $3,493 decrease, or 8%. The
decrease was due to less well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A decreased 17%, from $3,731 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $3,109 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to lower
audit and tax expenses.
Depletion was $2,085 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$2,067 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $18.
7
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $43,482 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $20,634 and a
reduction in working capital of $24,967, offset by an increase in production
costs of $805 and G&A expenses of $1,314. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $32,905 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $12,271 resulting from the
decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by less well maintenance
costs. The increase in G&A was primarily due to a higher percentage of the
managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit
and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 were for expenditures related to equipment upgrades on various oil and
gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$68,431, of which $17,222 was distributed to the general partners and $51,209 to
the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $96,204, of which $23,868 was distributed to
the general partners and $72,336 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
8
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 38,546 $ 38,716
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 63,269 34,340
------------ ------------
Total current assets 101,815 73,056
------------ ------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,245,144 5,240,632
Accumulated depletion (5,142,190) (5,133,431)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties 102,954 107,201
------------ ------------
$ 204,769 $ 180,257
============= =============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 8,817 $ 10,041
Partners' capital:
General partners 45,564 38,221
Limited partners (1,482 interests) 150,388 131,995
------------ ------------
195,952 170,216
------------ ------------
$ 204,769 $ 180,257
============= =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 416,230 $ 260,652 $ 199,789
Interest 3,071 1,858 2,462
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- 67
--------- --------- ---------
419,301 262,510 202,318
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 174,233 165,810 157,631
General and administrative 15,697 13,087 8,892
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 50,343
Depletion 8,759 11,881 116,799
--------- --------- ---------
198,689 190,778 333,665
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 220,612 $ 71,732 $(131,347)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
General partners $ 56,242 $ 19,205 $ (7,775)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 164,370 $ 52,527 $(123,572)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 110.91 $ 35.44 $ (83.38)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
General Limited
partners partners Total
-------------- -------------- ---------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 52,826 $ 295,972 $ 348,798
Distributions (10,054) (45,727) (55,781)
Net loss (7,775) (123,572) (131,347)
------------ ------------ -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 34,997 126,673 161,670
Distributions (15,981) (47,205) (63,186)
Net income 19,205 52,527 71,732
------------ ------------ -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 38,221 131,995 170,216
Distributions (48,899) (145,977) (194,876)
Net income 56,242 164,370 220,612
------------ ------------ -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 45,564 $ 150,388 $ 195,952
============= ============= ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 220,612 $ 71,732 $ (131,347)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 50,343
Depletion 8,759 11,881 116,799
Gain on disposition of assets - - (67)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (28,929) (11,525) 12,794
Accounts payable (1,224) 2,906 (3,523)
----------- ---------- ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 199,218 74,994 44,999
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (4,512) (3,421) (2,481)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - - 14,234
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (4,512) (3,421) 11,753
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (194,876) (63,186) (55,781)
----------- ----------- ------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (170) 8,387 971
Cash at beginning of year 38,716 30,329 29,358
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash at end of year $ 38,546 $ 38,716 $ 30,329
============ ============ =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 81-I, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1981 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
general partners are Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA") and P&P
Employees 81-I, Ltd. ("EMPL"). The Partnership's managing general partner is
Pioneer USA.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
7
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved
8
in the industry. As a result, the Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment
provision of $50,343 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $308,345 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 220,612 $ 71,732 $ (131,347)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 6,157 9,884 114,643
Impairment of oil and gas properties for
financial reporting purposes - - 50,343
Other, net (447) (62) 81
----------- ------------ -----------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 226,322 $ 81,554 $ 33,720
============ ============ ============
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Property acquisition costs $ 4,512 $ 3,421 $ 2,481
============= ============ =============
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 156,084 $ 156,084
Completed wells and equipment 5,089,060 5,084,548
------------- -------------
5,245,144 5,240,632
Accumulated depletion (5,142,190) (5,133,431)
------------- -------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 102,954 $ 107,201
============== ==============
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
9
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 78,719 $ 73,881 $ 76,809
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 12,487 $ 7,820 $ 6,250
Pioneer USA, EMPL and the Partnership are parties to the Partnership
agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership in which Pioneer USA owns 60% and the
remaining portion is owned by former affiliates.
The costs and revenues of the Partnership are allocated as follows:
General Limited
partners partners
-------- --------
Revenues:
Proceeds from property dispositions prior to cost
recovery 10% 90%
All other Partnership revenues 25% 75%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 10% 90%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 25% 75%
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 131,090 275,544
Revisions (70,930) (119,307)
Production (13,937) (24,638)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 46,223 131,599
Revisions 160,567 219,656
Production (14,970) (28,708)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 191,820 322,547
Revisions 33,336 130,129
Production (13,976) (25,901)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 211,180 426,775
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.30 per barrel of NGLs and $7.65 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $1,915,000 and undiscounted was $3,748,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
11
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 7,853 $ 4,776 $ 583
Future production costs (4,105) (3,078) (433)
------------- ------------ -------------
3,748 1,698 150
10% annual discount factor (1,833) (734) (64)
------------- ------------ -------------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 1,915 $ 964 $ 86
============== ============= ==============
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (242) $ (95) $ (42)
Net changes in prices and production costs 888 180 (301)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 415 788 (112)
Accretion of discount 96 8 52
Changes in production rates, timing and other (206) (3) (33)
------------- ------------ ------------
Change in present value of future net revenues 951 878 (436)
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, beginning of year 964 86 522
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, end of year $ 1,915 $ 964 $ 86
============== ============= =============
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 54% 51% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 59%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. - 6% 18%
Exxon Corporation 8% 7% 11%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $19,892 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
12
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
General partners - The general partners of the Partnership are Pioneer
USA and EMPL. Pioneer USA, the managing general partner, has the power
and authority to manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs.
As managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's
properties, all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and
billed to the Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas
revenues are received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of
the oil and gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to
being paid to the Partnership.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$7,410,000. The general partners are required to contribute amounts
equal to 10% of Partnership expenditures for lease acquisition, drilling
and completion and 25% of direct, general and administrative and
operating expenses.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
(A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 60% to $416,230 for 2000 as
compared to $260,652 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decrease in production. In 2000, 8,793
barrels of oil, 5,183 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 25,901 mcf of
gas were sold, or 18,293 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 9,249
barrels of oil, 5,721 barrels of NGLs and 28,708 mcf of gas were sold, or 19,755
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.32, or 73%, from
$16.94 in 1999 to $29.26 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.38, or 58%, from $9.22 in 1999 to $14.60 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of increased 81% from $1.78 in 1999 to $3.22 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $198,689 as compared to $190,778
in 1999, an increase of $7,911, or 4%. The increase was primarily due to an
increase in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $174,233 in 2000 and $165,810 in 1999, resulting in an
$8,423 increase, or 5%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by less well maintenance
costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
20% from $13,087 in 1999 to $15,697 in 2000, primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $12,487 in 2000 and $7,820 in 1999
for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $8,759 in 2000 as compared to $11,881 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $3,122, or 26%. This decrease was primarily due to a 20,821 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of the higher
commodity prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 30% to $260,652 from
$199,789 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received and an increase in production. In 1999, 9,249 barrels of oil, 5,721
barrels of NGLs and 28,708 mcf of gas were sold, or 19,755 BOEs. In 1998, 9,634
barrels of oil, 4,303 barrels of NGLs and 24,638 mcf of gas were sold, or 18,043
BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.61, or 27%, from
$13.33 in 1998 to $16.94 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.82, or 44%, from $6.40 in 1998 to $9.22 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas remained unchanged at $1.78 in 1998 and 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $190,778 as compared to $333,665
in 1998, a decrease of $142,887, or 43%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in depletion and the impairment of oil and gas properties, offset by an
increase in production costs and G&A.
Production costs were $165,810 in 1999 and $157,631 in 1998, resulting in an
$8,179 increase, or 5%. The increase was due to additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production and an increase in production taxes
due to increased oil and gas revenues, offset by a decline in ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 47% from $8,892 in 1998 to $13,087 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $7,820 in
1999 and $6,250 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $50,343 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $11,881 in 1999 compared to $116,799 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $104,918, or 90%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 104,672 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of the higher commodity prices, a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of 385
barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in
1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $124,224 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $156,791, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $8,423, G&A expenses paid of $2,610 and working capital of $21,534. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $187,015 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $30,224 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by lower well maintenance
costs. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the
managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to upgrades of equipment on various oil and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $194,876, of which $48,899 was
distributed to the general partners and $145,977 to the limited partners. In
1999, cash distributions to the partners were $63,186, of which $15,981 was
distributed to the general partners and $47,205 to the limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-I, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 211,753 $ 191,199 $ 416,230 $ 260,652 $ 199,789 $ 279,957 $ 396,128
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 50,343 $ 255,709 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 30,621
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 115,288 $ 97,064 $ 220,612 $ 71,732 $ (131,347) $ (241,864) $ 203,620
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
General partners $ 29,163 $ 24,819 $ 56,242 $ 19,205 $ (7,775) $ (11,941) $ 54,950
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 86,125 $ 72,245 $ 164,370 $ 52,527 $ (123,572) $ (229,923) $ 148,670
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 58.11 $ 48.75 $ 110.91 $ 35.44 $ (83.38) $ (155.14) $ 100.32
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 34.55 $ 48.81 $ 98.50 $ 31.85 $ 30.85 $ 68.90 $ 107.95(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 252,467 $ 181,960 $ 204,769 $ 180,257 $ 168,805 $ 359,456 $ 734,832
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $20.66
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
81-II Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 81-II Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 6,440
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 5,422
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 527
USA(a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 82.20
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.38 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 85.94
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 84.93
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 74.52
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 79.81
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 290
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its
partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent the estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to
sell the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
status or classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and
(2) neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership shall continue until terminated in accordance
with the applicable provisions of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 83,809 $ 29,376
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 38,815 64,821
---------- ----------
Total current assets 122,624 94,197
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,349,540 5,345,296
Accumulated depletion (4,842,640) (4,821,914)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 506,900 523,382
---------- ----------
$ 629,524 $ 617,579
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 9,160 $ 9,253
Partners' capital:
General partners 66,930 61,405
Limited partners (1,153 interests) 553,434 546,921
---------- ----------
620,364 608,326
---------- ----------
$ 629,524 $ 617,579
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 90,934 $ 104,047 $ 199,000 $ 174,048
Interest 663 496 1,345 893
-------- -------- -------- --------
91,597 104,543 200,345 174,941
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 50,059 50,877 100,899 99,416
General and administrative 2,729 3,420 7,177 5,610
Depletion 10,062 15,070 20,726 26,817
-------- -------- -------- --------
62,850 69,367 128,802 131,843
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 28,747 $ 35,176 $ 71,543 $ 43,098
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
General partners $ 8,696 $ 11,054 $ 20,740 $ 14,797
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 20,051 $ 24,122 $ 50,803 $ 28,301
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 17.39 $ 20.93 $ 44.06 $ 24.55
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
General Limited
partners partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 61,405 $ 546,921 $ 608,326
Distributions (15,215) (44,290) (59,505)
Net income 20,740 50,803 71,543
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 66,930 $ 553,434 $ 620,364
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 71,543 $ 43,098
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 20,726 26,817
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 26,006 (20,263)
Accounts payable (93) 1,090
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 118,182 50,742
-------- --------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (4,244) (5,487)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (59,505) (42,093)
-------- --------
Net increase in cash 54,433 3,162
Cash at beginning of period 29,376 30,160
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 83,809 $ 33,322
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 81-II (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership organized in
1981 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 14% to $199,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $174,048 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 4,136 barrels
6
of oil, 1,400 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 11,975 mcf of gas were
sold, or 7,532 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June
30, 2000, 4,547 barrels of oil, 2,406 barrels of NGLs and 6,862 mcf of gas were
sold, or 8,097 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.17, or 1%, from $27.24
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.41 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.03, or 21%, from
$14.40 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.43 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 127% from $2.26
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.12 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $128,802 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $131,843 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $3,041,
or 2%. This decrease was due to a decline in depletion, offset by increases in
general and administrative expenses ("G&A") and production costs.
Production costs were $100,899 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$99,416 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $1,483 increase, or 1%. The
increase was due to higher production taxes due to higher oil and gas prices and
additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
28% from $5,610 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $7,177 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $20,726 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$26,817 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $6,091, or 23%. This decrease
was the result of a decline in oil production of 411 barrels for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 13% to $90,934 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $104,047 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
7
a decrease in production, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 1,967 barrels of oil, 865
barrels of NGLs and 6,244 mcf of gas were sold, or 3,873 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 2,495 barrels of oil, 1,721 barrels of NGLs and
5,373 mcf of gas were sold, or 5,112 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.25, or 1%, from $27.16
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.91 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.13, or
16%, from $13.15 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.28 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 56% to
$3.97 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.54 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $62,850 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $69,367 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$6,517, or 9%. This decrease was due to declines in depletion, production costs
and G&A.
Production costs were $50,059 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$50,877 for the same period in 2000 resulting in an $818 decrease, or 2%. The
decrease was due to lower well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A decreased 20%, from $3,420 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $2,729 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues and a
decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $10,062 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$15,070 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $5,008, or 33%. This decrease
was the result of a decline in oil production of 528 barrels for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $67,440 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $25,404 and a
reduction in working capital of $45,086, offset by increases in production costs
of $1,483 and G&A expenses of $1,567. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $27,593 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $2,189 resulting from the
decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
8
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to
a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated
(limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas
revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, the Partnership's investing
activities included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on various oil
and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$59,505, of which $15,215 was distributed to the general partners and $44,290 to
the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $42,093, of which $9,905 was distributed to
the general partners and $32,188 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
9
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 81-II, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---------- ---------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 29,376 $ 30,160
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 64,821 27,908
---------- ---------
Total current assets 94,197 58,068
---------- ---------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,345,296 5,338,113
Accumulated depletion (4,821,914) (4,776,074)
---------- ---------
Net oil and gas properties 523,382 562,039
---------- ---------
$617,579 $ 620,107
========== =========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 9,253 $ 10,581
Partners' capital:
General partners 61,405 58,558
Limited partners (1,153 interests) 546,921 550,968
---------- ---------
608,326 609,526
---------- ---------
$ 617,579 $ 620,107
========== =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 387,180 $ 204,717 $ 209,110
Interest 2,775 1,395 1,725
Gain on disposition of assets - 240 -
-------- -------- --------
389,955 206,352 210,835
-------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 189,764 140,847 173,960
General and administrative 13,791 9,864 7,867
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 30,131
Depletion 45,840 49,409 95,466
-------- -------- --------
249,395 200,120 307,424
-------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) $ 140,560 $ 6,232 $ (96,589)
======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income (loss):
General partners $ 41,791 $ 8,423 $ (5,308)
======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 98,769 $ (2,191) $ (91,281)
======== ======== ========
Net income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 85.66 $ (1.90) $ (79.17)
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
General Limited
partners partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 76,354 $706,525 $782,879
Distributions (11,831) (34,220) (46,051)
Net loss (5,308) (91,281) (96,589)
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 59,215 581,024 640,239
Distributions (9,080) (27,865) (36,945)
Net income (loss) 8,423 (2,191) 6,232
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 58,558 550,968 609,526
Distributions (38,944) (102,816) (141,760)
Net income 41,791 98,769 140,560
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 61,405 $546,921 $608,326
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $140,560 $ 6,232 $(96,589)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 30,131
Depletion 45,840 49,409 95,466
Gain on disposition of assets - (240) -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (36,913) (3,325) 15,443
Accounts payable (1,328) 3,022 (3,482)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 148,159 55,098 40,969
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (7,183) (4,254) (8,322)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 690 -
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (7,183) (3,564) (8,322)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (141,760) (36,945) (46,051)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (784) 14,589 (13,404)
Cash at beginning of year 30,160 15,571 28,975
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 29,376 $30,160 $ 15,571
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 81-II (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1981 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
general partners are Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA") and P&P
Employees 81-II, Ltd. ("EMPL"). The Partnership's managing general partner is
Pioneer USA.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
7
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and gas
properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline
in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of its
oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on proved
reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved
8
in the industry. As a result, the Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment
provision of $30,131 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $172,373 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- -------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 140,560 $ 6,232 $ (96,589)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 41,011 44,867 91,653
Impairment of oil and gas properties for
financial reporting purposes - - 30,131
Other, net (482) (178) 454
--------- -------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $181,089 $ 50,921 $ 25,649
========= ======== =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- -------- ---------
Development costs $ 7,183 $ 4,254 $ 8,322
========= ======== =========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------- ----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 210,548 $ 210,548
Completed wells and equipment 5,134,748 5,127,565
---------- ----------
5,345,296 5,338,113
Accumulated depletion (4,821,914) (4,776,074)
Net oil and gas properties $ 523,382 $ 562,039
========== ==========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 75,129 $ 61,684 $ 82,817
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 11,615 $ 6,142 $ 6,273
Pioneer USA, EMPL and the Partnership are parties to the Partnership
agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership in which Pioneer USA owns 80% and the
remaining portion is owned by former affiliates.
The costs and revenues of the Partnership are allocated as follows:
General Limited
partners partners
-------- --------
Revenues:
Proceeds from property dispositions prior to cost
recovery 10% 90%
All other Partnership revenues 25% 75%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 10% 90%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 25% 75%
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 203,263 321,961
Revisions (93,478) (131,045)
Production (16,033) (22,439)
--------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 93,752 168,477
Revisions 118,281 224,790
Production (13,232) (19,167)
--------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 198,801 374,100
Revisions 18,015 (61,237)
Production (13,921) (15,864)
--------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 202,895 296,999
========= ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net revenues
of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64 per
barrel of oil, $14.08 per barrel of NGLs and $7.91 per mcf of gas, discounted at
10% was approximately $1,416,000 and undiscounted was $2,636,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
11
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- ---------- ---------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 6,624 $ 4,915 $ 1,020
Future production costs (3,988) (3,116) (849)
-------- --------- --------
2,636 1,799 171
10% annual discount factor (1,220) (799) (47)
-------- --------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future
net cash flows $ 1,416 $ 1,000 $ 124
======== ========= ========
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- ---------- ---------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (197) $ (64) $ (35)
Net changes in prices and production costs 530 471 (544)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 45 781 (94)
Accretion of discount 100 12 76
Changes in production rates, timing and
other (62) (324) (40)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net
revenues 416 876 (637)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 1,000 124 761
------ ------- ------
Balance, end of year $ 1,416 $ 1,000 $ 124
======= ======== =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 56% 48% -
LG&E Natural Marketing, Inc. 13% 17% 19%
NGTS LLC 11% 14% -
Western Gas Processing 2% 4% 13%
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. 4% 1% 43%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.,
LG&E Natural Marketing, Inc. and NGTS LLC were $26,794, $10,707 and $4,029,
respectively, which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and
gas sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
12
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
General partners - The general partners of the Partnership are Pioneer USA
and EMPL. Pioneer USA, the managing general partner, has the power and
authority to manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all
production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas
revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the
Partnership.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $5,765,000.
During 1983, the Partnership received a total of $675,000 from its limited
partnership in response to an assessment by the managing general partner.
The general partners are required to contribute amounts equal to 10% of
Partnership expenditures for lease acquisition, drilling and completion and
25% of direct, general and administrative and operating expenses.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
(A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 89% to $387,180 for 2000 as
compared to $204,717 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and a slight increase in production. In 2000, 8,885
barrels of oil, 5,036 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 15,864 mcf of
gas were sold, or 16,565 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 6,860
barrels of oil, 6,372 barrels of NGLs and 19,167 mcf of gas were sold, or 16,427
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.59, or 76%, from
$16.67 in 1999 to $29.26 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.89, or 79%, from $8.70 in 1999 to $15.59 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 69% from $1.82 in 1999 to $3.07 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $240 was recognized during 1999 from equipment
credits received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $249,395 as compared to $200,120
in 1999, an increase of $49,275, or 25%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $189,764 in 2000 and $140,847 in 1999, resulting in a
$48,917 increase, or 35%. The increase was primarily due to additional well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production and higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
40% from $9,864 in 1999 to $13,791 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $11,615 in 2000 and $6,142 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $45,840 in 2000 as compared to $49,409 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $3,569, or 7%. This decrease was primarily due to an 18,828 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices, offset by an increase in oil production of 2,025 barrels for the period
ended December 31, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues decreased 2% to $204,717 from
$209,110 in 1998. The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in
production, offset by higher average prices received. In 1999, 6,860 barrels of
oil, 6,372 barrels of NGLs and 19,167 mcf of gas were sold, or 16,427 BOEs. In
1998, 9,451 barrels of oil, 6,582 barrels of NGLs and 22,439 mcf of gas were
sold, or 19,773 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.51, or 27%, from
$13.16 in 1998 to $16.67 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $1.97, or 29%, from $6.73 in 1998 to $8.70 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased slightly from $1.80 in 1998 to $1.82 in 1999.
Gain on disposition of assets of $240 was recognized during 1999 from equipment
credits received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $200,120 as compared to $307,424
in 1998, a decrease of $107,304, or 35%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in depletion, production costs and the impairment of oil and gas
properties, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $140,847 in 1999 and $173,960 in 1998, resulting in a
$33,113 decrease, or 19%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs, ad valorem taxes and production taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 25% from $7,867 in 1998 to $9,864 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $6,142 in
1999 and $6,273 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $30,131 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $49,409 in 1999 compared to $95,466 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $46,057, or 48%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 59,807 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a decline in oil production
of 2,591 barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same
period in 1998 and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum Industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $93,061 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to increases in oil and
gas sales receipts of $183,843, offset by increases in production costs paid of
$48,917, G&A expenses paid of $3,927 and working capital of $37,938. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $65,846 to oil and gas receipts and
$117,997 resulted from an increase in production during 2000. The increase in
production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes associated with
higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well
production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the
managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to upgrades of equipment on various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $690 were received during 1999 for the sale
of equipment on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $141,760, of which $38,944 was
distributed to the general partners and $102,816 to the limited partners. In
1999, cash distributions to the partners were $36,945, of which $9,080 was
distributed to the general partners and $27,865 to the limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 81-II, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Oil and gas sales $ 199,000 $ 174,048 $ 387,180 $ 204,717 $ 209,110 $ 311,922 $ 363,398
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 30,131 $ 52,269 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 3,289
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 71,543 $ 43,098 $ 140,560 $ 6,232 $ (96,589) $ 9,511 $ 113,519
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
General partners $ 20,740 $ 14,797 $ 41,791 $ 8,423 $ (5,308) $ 24,620 $ 37,637
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 50,803 $ 28,301 $ 98,769 $ (2,191) $ (91,281) $ (15,109) $ 75,882
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 44.06 $ 24.55 $ 85.66 $ (1.90) $ (79.17) $ (13.10) $ 65.81
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 38.41 $ 27.92 $ 89.17 $ 24.17 $ 29.68 $ 93.49 $ 89.30(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 629,524 $ 622,202 $ 617,579 $ 620,107 $ 647,798 $ 793,920 $ 928,791
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $2.85
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
82-I, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 82-I, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of
limited partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of
June 30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
- 1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $11,805
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $11,639
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 868
USA(a),(b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b),(c) $ 83.32
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 2.80 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b),(c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 28.17
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 23.71
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c),(d) $ 75.12
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c),(e) $ 80.84
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 265
(c),(f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less, liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership shall continue until terminated in accordance
with the applicable provisions of its partnership agreement.
- 2 -
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 2-75530A
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-1825545
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- -----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000....................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000...................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001...................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000...................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements.............................. 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations...................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K........................... 11
Signatures................................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 171,115 $ 57,728
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 87,313 109,719
---------- ----------
Total current assets 258,428 167,447
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 9,901,101 9,901,101
Accumulated depletion (9,626,361) (9,613,644)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 274,740 287,457
---------- ----------
$ 533,168 $ 454,904
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 19,146 $ 13,712
Partners' capital:
General partners 181,450 161,365
Limited partners (4,891 interests) 332,572 279,827
---------- ----------
514,022 441,192
---------- ----------
$ 533,168 $ 454,904
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
--------------------- ---------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 205,010 $ 177,445 $ 421,846 $ 349,532
Interest 1,178 1,350 2,407 2,323
-------- -------- -------- --------
206,188 178,795 424,253 351,855
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 99,464 98,002 197,450 183,025
General and administrative 6,272 5,969 14,448 11,332
Depletion 6,849 7,055 12,717 16,112
-------- -------- -------- --------
112,585 111,026 224,615 210,469
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 93,603 $ 67,769 $ 199,638 $ 141,386
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
General partners $ 24,428 $ 18,000 $ 51,562 $ 37,763
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 69,175 $ 49,769 $ 148,076 $ 103,623
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 14.15 $ 10.18 $ 30.28 $ 21.19
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
General Limited
partners partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 161,365 $ 279,827 $ 441,192
Distributions (31,477) (95,331) (126,808)
Net income 51,562 148,076 199,638
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 181,450 $ 332,572 $ 514,022
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 199,638 $ 141,386
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 12,717 16,112
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 22,406 (28,544)
Accounts payable 5,434 8,360
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 240,195 137,314
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties - (1,493)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (126,808) (136,929)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 113,387 (1,108)
Cash at beginning of period 57,728 61,558
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 171,115 $ 60,450
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1982 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 21% to $421,846 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $349,532 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a slight decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 9,044
barrels of oil, 2,344 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 27,831 mcf of
7
gas were sold, or 16,027 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months
ended June 30, 2000, 8,863 barrels of oil, 3,292 barrels of NGLs and 23,257 mcf
of gas were sold, or 16,031 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.21, or 1%, from $27.45
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.66 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.42, or 26%, from
$13.16 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.58 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 76% from $2.71 during
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.77 for the same period in 2001. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $224,615 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $210,469 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$14,146, or 7%. This increase was attributable to increases in production costs
and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in
depletion.
Production costs were $197,450 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$183,025 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $14,425 increase, or 8%.
This increase was due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate
well production and higher production taxes associated with higher oil and gas
prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
27% from $11,332 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $14,448 for the same
period in 2001 primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $12,717 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$16,112 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $3,395, or 21%. This decrease
was primarily due to positive revisions to proved reserves on two significant
wells during the period ended June 30, 2001.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 16% to $205,010 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $177,445 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs and an increase in production, offset by lower average prices received
for oil. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 4,582 barrels of oil, 1,488
barrels of NGLs and 14,557 mcf of gas were sold, or 8,496 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 4,430 barrels of oil, 1,482 barrels of NGLs and
11,022 mcf of gas were sold, or 7,749 BOEs.
8
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.35, or 1%, from $27.67
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.32 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.05, or 8%, from
$13.75 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.80 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 27% from $3.13
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.97 for the same period in
2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $112,585 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $111,026 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$1,559, or 1%. This increase was due to increases in production costs and G&A,
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $99,464 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$98,002 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $1,462 increase, or 1%. This
increase was due to higher production taxes associated with higher gas and NGL
prices and additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well
production.
During this period, G&A increased 5% from $5,969 for the three months ended June
30, 2000 to $6,272 for the same period in 2001 primarily due to a higher
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $6,849 for the three months ended June 30, 2000 as compared to
$7,055 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $206, or 3%. This decrease was
primarily due to positive revisions to proved reserves on two significant wells
during the period ended June 30, 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $102,881 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase of $72,398 in oil and gas sales receipts and a
reduction of $48,024 in working capital, offset by increases in production costs
of $14,425 and G&A expenses of $3,116. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $61,286 to oil and gas receipts and $11,112 resulting from an
increase in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production and increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due
to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated
(limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas
revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principle investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2000 were related to the upgrades of oil and gas equipment on active
properties.
9
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$126,808, of which $31,477 was distributed to the general partners and $95,331
to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $136,929, of which $34,201 was distributed to
the general partners and $102,728 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 6, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
-----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 2-75530A
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-1825545
------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code: (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($2,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$8,515,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 4,891.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1982 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA")
and its co-general partner is P&P Employees 82-I, Ltd. ("EMPL"), a Texas limited
partnership whose general partner is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer"). As of March 8,
2001, the Partnership had 4,891 limited partnership interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers. Of the Partnership's total oil and
gas revenues for 2000, approximately 68% and 13% were attributable to sales made
to Plains Marketing, L.P. and GPM Gas Corporation, respectively. Pioneer USA is
of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not have an adverse
effect on its ability to sell its oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas
production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
2
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial liability due to pollution and other
environmental damages. Although the Partnership believes that its business
operations do not impair environmental quality and that its costs of complying
with any applicable environmental regulations are not currently significant, the
Partnership cannot predict what, if any, effect these environmental regulations
may have on its current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental and exploratory oil and gas
prospects located in Texas and New Mexico were acquired by the Partnership,
resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 34 oil and gas
wells. There were six dry holes from previous periods, two wells plugged and
abandoned and nine wells sold. At December 31, 2000, 17 wells were producing.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 4,891 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 600 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $229,765 and
$50,502, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 763,858 $ 441,997 $ 392,883 $ 608,207 $ 710,173
============ ============ ============ ============ ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 43,618
============ ============ ============ ============ ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ 294,610 $ 165,201 $ 2,277
============ ============ ============ ============ ==========
Net income (loss) $ 337,729 $ 17,320 $ (563,993) $ (60,847) $ 312,582
============ ============ ============ ============ ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
General partners $ 88,128 $ 18,135 $ (49,472) $ 31,736 $ 92,811
============ ============ ============ ============ ==========
Limited partners $ 249,601 $ (815) $ (514,521) $ (92,583) $ 219,771
============ ============ ============ ============ ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 51.03 $ (.17) $ (105.20) $ (18.93) $ 44.93
============ ============ ============ ============ ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 46.98 $ 10.33 $ 19.57 $ 47.31 $ 51.40(a)
============ ============ ============ ============ ==========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $ 454,904 $ 425,107 $ 474,528 $ 1,158,135 $1,526,765
============ ============ ============ ============ ==========
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $6.96 in
1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 73% to $763,858 for 2000 as
compared to $441,997 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 17,639
barrels of oil, 6,519 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 45,981 mcf of
gas were sold, or 31,822 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 17,472
barrels of oil, 6,414 barrels of NGLs and 48,380 mcf of gas were sold, or 31,949
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.78, or 77%, from
$16.61 in 1999 to $29.39 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.48, or 61%, from $8.96 in 1999 to $14.44 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 69% from $1.95 in 1999 to $3.29 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $431,421 as compared to $427,526
in 1999, an increase of $3,895, or 1%. The increase was due to increases in
production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a
decline in depletion.
Production costs were $378,872 in 2000 and $313,158 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $65,714, or 21%. The increase was primarily due to additional well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production and higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
39% from $18,932 in 1999 to $26,409 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $22,916 in 2000 and $13,260 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $26,140 in 2000 as compared to $95,436 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $69,296, or 73%. This decrease was primarily due to a 86,555 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 13% to $441,997 from
$392,883 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 17,472 barrels of oil,
6,414 barrels of NGLs and 48,380 mcf of gas were sold, or 31,949 BOEs. In 1998,
19,150 barrels of oil, 6,748 barrels of NGLs and 48,971 mcf of gas were sold, or
34,060 BOEs.
5
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.29, or 25%, from
$13.32 in 1998 to $16.61 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $1.76, or 24%, from $7.20 in 1998 to $8.96 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 7% from $1.82 in 1998 to $1.95 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $199 was recognized during 1998 from post
closing adjustments received from the sale of eight oil and gas wells during
1997.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $427,526 as compared to $961,319
in 1998, a decrease of $533,793, or 56%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A expenses.
Production costs were $313,158 in 1999 and $336,406 in 1998, resulting in a
$23,248 decrease, or 7%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 30% from $14,542 in 1998 to $18,932 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $13,260 in
1999 and $11,786 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $294,610 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $95,436 in 1999 compared to $315,761 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $220,325, or 70%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 168,752 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact
6
on world oil prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals
on North American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price
environment and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue
during 2001, there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a
less favorable level or that field service costs will not escalate in the
future, both of which could negatively impact the Partnership's future results
of operations and cash distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $227,133 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $324,304, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $65,714, G&A expenses paid of $7,477 and working capital of $23,980. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $325,772 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $1,468 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principle investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were
related to the upgrades of oil and gas equipment on various oil and gas
properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $704 in 1999 were from equipment credits
received on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $308,330, of which $78,565 was
distributed to the general partners and $229,765 to the limited partners. In
1999, cash distributions to the partners were $67,767, of which $17,265 was
distributed to the general partners and $50,502 to the limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report............................................ 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999......................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998...................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 13
Notes to Financial Statements........................................... 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 57,728 $ 61,558
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 109,719 61,533
----------- -----------
Total current assets 167,447 123,091
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 9,901,101 9,889,520
Accumulated depletion (9,613,644) (9,587,504)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 287,457 302,016
----------- -----------
$ 454,904 $ 425,107
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 13,712 $ 13,314
Partners' capital:
General partners 161,365 151,802
Limited partners (4,891 interests) 279,827 259,991
----------- -----------
441,192 411,793
----------- -----------
$ 454,904 $ 425,107
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 763,858 $ 441,997 $ 392,883
Interest 5,292 2,849 4,244
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- 199
--------- --------- ---------
769,150 444,846 397,326
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 378,872 313,158 336,406
General and administrative 26,409 18,932 14,542
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 294,610
Depletion 26,140 95,436 315,761
--------- --------- ---------
431,421 427,526 961,319
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 337,729 $ 17,320 $(563,993)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
General partners $ 88,128 $ 18,135 $ (49,472)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 249,601 $ (815) $(514,521)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership
interest $ 51.03 $ (.17) $ (105.20)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
General Limited
partners partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 221,119 $ 921,541 $ 1,142,660
Distributions (20,715) (95,712) (116,427)
Net loss (49,472) (514,521) (563,993)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 150,932 311,308 462,240
Distributions (17,265) (50,502) (67,767)
Net income (loss) 18,135 (815) 17,320
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 151,802 259,991 411,793
Distributions (78,565) (229,765) (308,330)
Net income 88,128 249,601 337,729
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 161,365 $ 279,827 $ 441,192
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 337,729 $ 17,320 $(563,993)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 294,610
Depletion 26,140 95,436 315,761
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- (199)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (48,186) (24,834) 26,999
Accounts payable 398 1,026 (3,187)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 316,081 88,948 69,991
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (11,581) (4,754) (6,820)
Proceeds from asset dispositions -- 704 14,397
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (11,581) (4,050) 7,577
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (308,330) (67,767) (116,427)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (3,830) 17,131 (38,859)
Cash at beginning of year 61,558 44,427 83,286
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 57,728 $ 61,558 $ 44,427
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1982 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
general partners are Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA") and P&P
Employees 82-I, Ltd. ("EMPL"). The Partnership's managing general partner is
Pioneer USA.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
14
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $294,610 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
15
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $663,714 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 337,729 $ 17,320 $(563,993)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for
tax reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 21,746 92,542 312,201
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes -- -- 294,610
Loss on disposition of assets -- -- (116)
Other, net (637) 77 786
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 358,838 $ 109,939 $ 43,488
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ------
Development costs $ 11,581 $ 4,754 $6,820
========= ========= ======
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 360,899 $ 360,899
Completed wells and equipment 9,540,202 9,528,621
----------- -----------
9,901,101 9,889,520
Accumulated depletion (9,613,644) (9,587,504)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 287,457 $ 302,016
=========== ===========
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related
16
party transactions with the managing general partner during the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $162,023 $156,380 $150,391
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 22,916 $ 13,260 $ 11,786
Pioneer USA, EMPL and the Partnership are parties to the Partnership
agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership in which Pioneer USA owns 77.5% and the
remaining portion is owned by former affiliates. In addition, Pioneer USA owned
634 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
The costs and revenues of the Partnership are allocated as follows:
General Limited
partners partners
-------- --------
Revenues:
Proceeds from property dispositions prior to cost
recovery 10% 90%
All other Partnership revenues 25% 75%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 10% 90%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 25% 75%
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 321,477 448,047
Revisions (230,755) (305,609)
Production (25,898) (48,971)
-------- --------
17
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 64,824 93,467
Revisions 280,613 443,568
Production (23,886) (48,380)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 321,551 488,655
Revisions 60,464 362,471
Production (24,158) (45,981)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 357,857 805,145
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.55
per barrel of oil, $13.69 per barrel of NGLs and $8.68 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $3,226,000 and undiscounted was $6,208,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 15,230 $ 8,078 $ 701
18
Future production costs (9,022) (5,386) (624)
-------- -------- --------
6,208 2,692 77
10% annual discount factor (2,982) (1,056) (11)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 3,226 $ 1,636 $ 66
======== ======== ========
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (385) $ (128) $ (56)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,448 378 (898)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 927 2,018 (164)
Accretion of discount 164 6 118
Changes in production rates, timing and other (564) (704) (113)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,590 1,570 (1,113)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 1,636 66 1,179
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 3,226 $ 1,636 $ 66
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Plains Marketing, L.P. 68% 66% --
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. -- -- 65%
GPM Gas Corporation 13% 14% 13%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 1% 2% 10%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
and GPM Gas Corporation were $54,651 and $30,037, respectively, which are
included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the
accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
General partners - The general partners of the Partnership are Pioneer
USA and EMPL.
19
Pioneer USA, the managing general partner, has the power and authority
to manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing
general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all
production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$9,782,000. During 1985, the Partnership received a total of $1,372,500
from its limited partners in response to an assessment by the managing
general partner. Additionally, $650,000 was contributed by the managing
general partner for limited partnership interests on unpaid assessments
of which $500,000 was paid in 1985 and $150,000 in 1986. The general
partners are required to contribute amounts equal to 10% of Partnership
expenditures for lease acquisition, drilling and completion and 25% of
direct, general and administrative and operating expenses.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts
21
Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981 from the
University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business Development
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief Financial
Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr. Dove joined
Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and was promoted
to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in which
position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley, Mr.
Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus Energy
Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B.S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. Under the
Partnership agreement, Pioneer USA pays 8% of the Partnership's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 20% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated 20% of the
Partnership's revenues.
EMPL is a co-general partner of the Partnership. Under this arrangement, EMPL
pays 2% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 5%
of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, EMPL is
allocated 5% of the Partnership's revenues. EMPL does not receive any fees or
reimbursements from the Partnership.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
and EMPL respectively own 80% and 20% of the general partners' interests in the
Partnership. Pioneer USA owned 634 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
23
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $162,023 $156,380 $150,391
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 22,916 $ 13,260 $ 11,786
Under the limited partnership agreement, the general partners, Pioneer USA and
EMPL, together pay 10% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion
costs and 25% of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In
return, they are allocated 25% of the Partnership's revenues. Twenty percent of
the general partners' share of costs and revenues is allocated to EMPL and the
remainder is allocated to Pioneer USA. Certain former affiliates of Pioneer USA
are limited partners of EMPL. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Partnership.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the required
information is in the financial statements or notes thereto, or is not
applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
Dated: March 23, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
---------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 23, 2001
-----------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 23, 2001
----------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 23, 2001
----------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 23, 2001
----------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 23, 2001
----------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 23, 2001
----------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to
Item 14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3.1 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parker -
& Parsley 82-I, Ltd. incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4(e) of Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
2-75503A), as amended on February 4, 1982,
the effective date thereof (hereinafter called,
the Partnership's Registration Statement)
3.2 Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited -
Partnership of Parker & Parsley 82-I, Ltd.
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of
the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1983
4.1 Form of Subscription Agreement and Power -
of Attorney incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4(b) of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4.2 Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4(d) of the Partnership's Registration Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-I, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 421,846 $ 349,532 $ 763,858 $ 441,997 $ 392,883 $ 608,207 $ 710,173
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 43,618
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 294,610 $ 165,201 $ 2,277
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 199,638 $ 141,386 $ 337,729 $ 17,320 $ (563,993) $ (60,847) $ 312,582
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
General partners $ 51,562 $ 37,763 $ 88,128 $ 18,135 $ (49,472) $ 31,736 $ 92,811
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 148,076 $ 103,623 $ 249,601 $ (815) $ (514,521) $ (92,583) $ 219,771
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 30.28 $ 21.19 $ 51.03 $ (.17) $ (105.20) $ (18.93) $ 44.93
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 19.49 $ 21.00 $ 46.98 $ 10.33 $ 19.57 $ 47.31 $ 51.40(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 533,168 $ 437,924 $ 454,904 $ 425,107 $ 474,528 $1,158,135 $1,526,765
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $6.96
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
82-II, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 82-II, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 12,252
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 13,991
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,210
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 103.27
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 4.11 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 69.35
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 67.39
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 95.04
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 100.27
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 245
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership shall continue until terminated in accordance
with the applicable provisions of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 2-75530B
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-1867115
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and 2000........................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 155,816 $ 77,911
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 91,508 107,778
---------- ----------
Total current assets 247,324 185,689
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 8,307,568 8,305,901
Accumulated depletion (7,553,587) (7,531,290)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 753,981 774,611
---------- ----------
$ 1,001,305 $ 960,300
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 17,621 $ 12,662
Partners' capital:
General partners 134,008 121,968
Limited partners (6,126 interests) 849,676 825,670
---------- ----------
983,684 947,638
---------- ----------
$ 1,001,305 $ 960,300
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 172,463 $ 169,196 $ 384,143 $ 334,606
Interest 1,159 1,676 2,558 2,939
-------- -------- -------- --------
173,622 170,872 386,701 337,545
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 79,225 72,440 184,165 147,258
General and administrative 5,282 5,668 13,211 10,827
Depletion 11,536 9,028 22,297 21,203
-------- -------- -------- --------
96,043 87,136 219,673 179,288
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 77,579 $ 83,736 $ 167,028 $ 158,257
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
General partners $ 21,125 $ 22,288 $ 44,846 $ 42,745
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 56,454 $ 61,448 $ 122,182 $ 115,512
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 9.21 $ 10.03 $ 19.94 $ 18.86
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
General Limited
partners partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 121,968 $ 825,670 $ 947,638
Distributions (32,806) (98,176) (130,982)
Net income 44,846 122,182 167,028
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 134,008 $ 849,676 $ 983,684
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 167,028 $ 158,257
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 22,297 21,203
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 16,270 (8,639)
Accounts payable 4,959 5,136
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 210,554 175,957
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,667) (1,538)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (130,982) (180,435)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 77,905 (6,016)
Cash at beginning of period 77,911 91,672
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 155,816 $ 85,656
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1982 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. However, these interim results are not
necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may
have been made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June
30, 2001 financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 15% to $384,143 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $334,606 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decline in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 7,984 barrels
7
of oil, 2,949 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 22,031 mcf of gas were
sold, or 14,605 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 8,628 barrels of oil, 3,976 barrels of NGLs and 18,498 mcf of gas
were sold, or 15,687 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.28, or 1%, from $27.51
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.79 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.52, or 26% from
$13.63 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.15 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 118% from $2.33
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.07 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $219,673 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $179,288 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$40,385, or 23%. This increase was due to increases in production costs, general
and administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $184,165 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$147,258 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $36,907 increase, or 25%.
This increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production and higher production taxes associated with increased
oil and gas revenues.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
22% from $10,827 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $13,211 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $22,297 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$21,203 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,094, or 5%. This increase
was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of
644 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 2% to $172,463 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001, as compared to $169,196 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by lower average prices received for oil and a decrease in
production. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 3,738 barrels of oil,
1,577 barrels of NGLs and 10,439 mcf of gas were sold, or 7,055 BOEs. For the
8
three months ended June 30, 2000, 4,189 barrels of oil, 1,932 barrels of NGLs
and 9,347 mcf of gas were sold, or 7,679 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.34, or 1%, from $27.76
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.42 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.95, or
7%, from $14.12 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.07 for the
three months ended June 30, 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas
increased 62% to $4.43 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.74
during the same period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $96,043 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $87,136 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$8,907, or 10%. This increase was due to increases in production costs and
depletion, offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $79,225 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$72,440 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $6,785 increase, or 9%. The
increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 7% from $5,668 for the three months ended June
30, 2000 to $5,282 for the same period in 2001 due to a decrease in audit and
tax fees.
Depletion was $11,536 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$9,028 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $2,508, or 28%. This increase
was primarily due to a decline in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of
451 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $34,597 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period in 2000. This increase was due
to an increase of $49,156 in oil and gas sales receipts and a reduction of
$24,732 in working capital, offset by increases in production costs of $36,907
and G&A expenses of $2,384. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from
the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an additional
$66,765 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $17,609 resulting from the decline in
production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in
production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred
to stimulate well production and increased production taxes associated with
higher oil and gas prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues and an
increase in audit and tax fees.
9
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 were related to the upgrades of oil and gas equipment on active
properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$130,982, of which $32,806 was distributed to the general partners and $98,176
to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $180,435, of which $45,080 was distributed to
the general partners and $135,355 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
10
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 7, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
---------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 2-75530B
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-1867115
------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code: (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($2,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$11,800,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 6,126.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
Parts I and II of this annual report on Form 10-K (the "Report") contain forward
looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no
assurances can be given that the actual events and results will not be
materially different than the anticipated results described in the forward
looking statements. See "Item 1. Business" for a description of various factors
that could materially affect the ability of the Partnership to achieve the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1982 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA")
and its co-general partner is P&P Employees 82-II, Ltd. ("EMPL"), a Texas
limited partnership whose general partner is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer"). As of
March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 6,126 limited partnership interests
outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 70% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations. The oil and gas business is
also subject to environmental hazards such as oil spills, gas leaks and
2
ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that could expose the
Partnership to substantial liability due to pollution and other environmental
damages. Although the Partnership believes that its business operations do not
impair environmental quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable
environmental regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot
predict what, if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its
current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental and exploratory oil and gas
prospects located in Texas and New Mexico were acquired by the Partnership,
resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 52 oil and gas
wells. At December 31, 2000, the Partnership had 16 producing oil and gas wells.
Two wells were plugged and abandoned, five wells were dry holes and 29 wells
have been sold.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 6,126 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 772 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the general partners, are not required
to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners at least
quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During the years
ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $270,025 and $93,647,
respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 730,936 $ 477,533 $ 379,887 $ 598,339 $ 732,599
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 45,027
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ 65,229 $ 310,732 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 350,536 $ 120,353 $ (131,488) $ (93,386) $ 322,918
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
General partner $ 94,215 $ 38,680 $ 2,863 $ 30,221 $ 98,377
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 256,321 $ 81,673 $ (134,351) $ (123,607) $ 224,541
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 41.84 $ 13.33 $ (21.93) $ (20.18) $ 36.65
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 44.08 $ 15.29 $ (46.67) $ 43.00 $ 49.38 (a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $ 960,300 $ 971,351 $ 971,390 $1,456,326 $1,893,741
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $6.02 in
1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 53% to $730,936 for 2000 as
compared to $477,533 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 17,293
barrels of oil, 7,629 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 35,900 mcf of
gas were sold, or 30,905 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 17,967
barrels of oil, 9,587 barrels of NGLs and 42,858 mcf of gas were sold, or 34,697
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.39, or 73%, from
$17.08 in 1999 to $29.47 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.21, or 53%, from $9.80 in 1999 to $15.01 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 66% from $1.79 in 1999 to $2.98 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $387,226 as compared to $361,025
in 1999, an increase of $26,201, or 7%. This increase was due to increases in
production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a
decline in depletion.
Production costs were $316,735 in 2000 and $280,719 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $36,016, or 13%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
28%, from $19,626 in 1999 to $25,120 in 2000 primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $21,928 in 2000 and $14,326 in
1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $45,371 in 2000 as compared to $60,680 in 1999, a decrease of
$15,309, or 25%. This decrease was primarily due to a 21,082 barrels of oil
increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 26% to $477,533 from
$379,887 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 17,967 barrels of oil,
9,587 barrels of NGLs and 42,858 mcf of gas were sold, or 34,697 BOEs. In 1998,
19,042 barrels of oil, 8,812 barrels of NGLs and 41,862 mcf of gas were sold, or
5
34,831 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.94, or 30%, from
$13.14 in 1998 to $17.08 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.87, or 41%, from $6.93 in 1998 to $9.80 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 9% from $1.64 in 1998 to $1.79 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $1,281 was recognized during 1998 from post
closing adjustments received from the sale of six oil and gas wells and an
overriding royalty interest in one well during 1997.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $361,025 as compared to $523,894
in 1998, a decrease of $162,869, or 31%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in depletion and the impairment of oil and gas properties, offset by
increases in production costs and G&A expenses.
Production costs were $280,719 in 1999 and $274,382 in 1998, resulting in an
increase of $6,337, or 2%. The increase was primarily due to additional well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production and an increase in
production taxes due to increased oil and gas revenues, offset by a decline in
ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 45% from $13,493 in 1998 to $19,626 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $14,326 in
1999 and $11,397 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $65,229 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $60,680 in 1999 compared to $170,790 in 1998, a decrease of
$110,110, or 64%. This decrease was the result of an increase in proved reserves
of 182,544 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices and
a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization
6
of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and certain other crude oil exporting
nations announced reductions in their planned export volumes. Those
announcements, together with the enactment of the announced reductions in export
volumes, had a positive impact on world oil prices, as have overall natural gas
supply and demand fundamentals on North American natural gas prices. Although
the favorable commodity price environment and stable field service cost
environment is expected to continue during 2001, there is no assurance that
commodity prices will not return to a less favorable level or that field service
costs will not escalate in the future, both of which could negatively impact the
Partnership's future results of operations and cash distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $202,645 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $256,384, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $36,016, G&A expenses paid of $5,494 and working capital of $12,229. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $326,338 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $69,954 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on several oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $422 in 1999 were from equipment credits
received on active properties. During 1998, proceeds from disposition of assets
of $153,683 were primarily from the sale of six oil and gas wells during 1997.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $361,123, of which $91,098 was
distributed to the general partners and $270,025 to the limited partners. In
1999, cash distributions to the partners were $124,365, of which $30,718 was
distributed to the general partners and $93,647 to the limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report............................................ 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999......................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998...................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 13
Notes to Financial Statements........................................... 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 77,911 $ 91,672
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 107,778 68,374
----------- -----------
Total current assets 185,689 160,046
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 8,305,901 8,297,224
Accumulated depletion (7,531,290) (7,485,919)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 774,611 811,305
----------- -----------
$ 960,300 $ 971,351
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 12,662 $ 13,126
Partners' capital:
General partners 121,968 118,851
Limited partners (6,126 interests) 825,670 839,374
----------- -----------
947,638 958,225
----------- -----------
$ 960,300 $ 971,351
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 730,936 $ 477,533 $ 379,887
Interest 6,826 3,845 11,238
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- 1,281
--------- --------- ---------
737,762 481,378 392,406
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 316,735 280,719 274,382
General and administrative 25,120 19,626 13,493
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 65,229
Depletion 45,371 60,680 170,790
--------- --------- ---------
387,226 361,025 523,894
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 350,536 $ 120,353 $(131,488)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
General partners $ 94,215 $ 38,680 $ 2,863
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 256,321 $ 81,673 $(134,351)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 41.84 $ 13.33 $ (21.93)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
General Limited
partners partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 167,998 $ 1,271,605 $ 1,439,603
Distributions (59,972) (285,906) (345,878)
Net income (loss) 2,863 (134,351) (131,488)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 110,889 851,348 962,237
Distributions (30,718) (93,647) (124,365)
Net income 38,680 81,673 120,353
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 118,851 839,374 958,225
Distributions (91,098) (270,025) (361,123)
Net income 94,215 256,321 350,536
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 121,968 $ 825,670 $ 947,638
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 350,536 $ 120,353 $(131,488)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 65,229
Depletion 45,371 60,680 170,790
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- (1,281)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (39,404) (31,612) 23,310
Accounts payable (464) 3,973 (7,570)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 356,039 153,394 118,990
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (8,677) (2,053) (13,600)
Proceeds from asset dispositions -- 422 153,683
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (8,677) (1,631) 140,083
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (361,123) (124,365) (345,878)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (13,761) 27,398 (86,805)
Cash at beginning of year 91,672 64,274 151,079
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 77,911 $ 91,672 $ 64,274
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited
partnership organized in 1982 under the laws of the State of Texas. The
Partnership's general partners are Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer
USA") and P&P Employees 82-II, Ltd. ("EMPL"). The Partnership's managing general
partner is Pioneer USA.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
14
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
15
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $65,229 related to its
proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $425,788 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 350,536 $ 120,353 $(131,488)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 39,685 55,288 163,319
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes -- -- 65,229
Other, net (932) 209 217
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 389,289 $ 175,850 $ 97,277
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- -------
Development costs $ 8,677 $ 2,053 $13,600
========= ========= =======
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 415,980 $ 415,980
Completed wells and equipment 7,889,921 7,881,244
----------- -----------
8,305,901 8,297,224
Accumulated depletion (7,531,290) (7,485,919)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 774,611 $ 811,305
=========== ===========
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $143,855 $139,170 $133,844
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 21,928 $ 14,326 $ 11,397
Pioneer USA, EMPL and the Partnership are parties to the Partnership
agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership in which Pioneer USA owns 83% and the
remaining portion is owned by former affiliates. In addition, Pioneer USA owned
226 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
The costs and revenues of the Partnership are allocated as follows:
General Limited
partners partners
-------- --------
Revenues:
Proceeds from property dispositions prior to cost
recovery 10% 90%
All other Partnership revenues 25% 75%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 10% 90%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 25% 75%
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 376,355 512,848
Revisions (163,438) (164,998)
Production (27,854) (41,862)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 185,063 305,988
Revisions 288,622 425,997
Production (27,554) (42,858)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 446,131 689,127
Revisions (13,008) (29,574)
Production (24,922) (35,900)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 408,201 623,653
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.58
per barrel of oil, $13.60 per barrel of NGLs and $8.05 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $3,222,000 and undiscounted was $6,505,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
18
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 14,233 $ 11,083 $ 2,024
Future production costs (7,728) (6,439) (1,464)
-------- -------- --------
6,505 4,644 560
10% annual discount factor (3,283) (2,235) (228)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 3,222 $ 2,409 $ 332
======== ======== ========
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (414) $ (197) $ (106)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,300 807 (871)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (118) 1,768 (241)
Accretion of discount 240 33 147
Changes in production rates, timing and other (195) (334) (72)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 813 2,077 (1,143)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 2,409 332 1,475
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 3,222 $ 2,409 $ 332
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 70% 65% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 66%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 2% 5% 21%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $56,201 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
General partners - The general partners of the Partnership are Pioneer
USA and EMPL. Pioneer USA, the managing general partner, has the power
and authority to manage, control
19
and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing general partner and
operator of the Partnership's properties, all production expenses are
incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The majority of
the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly by the
Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is initially
received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$12,252,000. The general partners are required to contribute amounts
equal to 10% of Partnership expenditures for lease acquisition, drilling
and completion and 25% of direct, general and administrative and
operating expenses.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. Under the
Partnership agreement, Pioneer USA pays 8% of the Partnership's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 20% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated 20% of the
Partnership's revenues.
EMPL is a co-general partner of the Partnership. Under this arrangement, EMPL
pays 2% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 5%
of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, EMPL is
allocated 5% of the Partnership's revenues. EMPL does not receive any fees or
reimbursements from the Partnership.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
and EMPL respectively own 80% and 20% of the general partners' interests in the
Partnership. Pioneer USA owned 226 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
23
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the general partners during the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 143,855 $ 139,170 $133,844
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 21,928 $ 14,326 $ 11,397
Under the limited partnership agreement, the general partners, Pioneer USA and
EMPL, together pay 10% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion
costs and 25% of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In
return, they are allocated 25% of the Partnership's revenues. Twenty percent of
the general partner's share of costs and revenues is allocated to EMPL and the
remainder is allocated to Pioneer USA. Certain former affiliates of the managing
general partner are limited partners of EMPL. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes
to Financial Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data", regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing
general partner in oil and gas activities of the Partnership.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
Dated: March 23, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
--------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 23, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to
Item 14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3.1 Agreement of Limited Partnership of -
Parker & Parsley 82-II, Ltd. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4(e) of Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 2-75503B), as amended
on February 4, 1982, the effective date
thereof (hereinafter called, the Partnership's
Registration Statement)
3.2 Amended and Restated Certificate of -
Limited Partnership of Parker & Parsley
82-II, Ltd. incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 of the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1983
4.1 Form of Subscription Agreement and Power -
of Attorney incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4(b) of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4.2 Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4(d) of the Partnership's Registration Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-II, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 384,143 $ 334,606 $ 730,936 $ 477,533 $ 379,887 $ 598,339 $ 732,599
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 45,027
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 65,229 $ 310,732 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 167,028 $ 158,257 $ 350,536 $ 120,353 $ (131,488) $ (93,386) $ 322,918
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
General partners $ 44,846 $ 42,745 $ 94,215 $ 38,680 $ 2,863 $ 30,221 $ 98,377
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 122,182 $ 115,512 $ 256,321 $ 81,673 $ (134,351) $ (123,607) $ 224,541
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 19.94 $ 18.86 $ 41.84 $ 13.33 $ (21.93) $ (20.18) $ 36.65
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 16.03 $ 22.10 $ 44.08 $ 15.29 $ (46.67) $ 43.00 $ 49.38(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,001,305 $ 954,309 $ 960,300 $ 971,351 $ 971,390 $1,456,326 $1,893,741
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $6.02
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
82-III, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 82-III, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 6,882
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 6,781
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 788
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 121.71
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.16 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 59.63
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 55.84
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 111.16
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 118.07
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 220
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent the estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to
sell the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership shall continue until terminated in accordance
with the applicable provisions of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 115,914 $ 46,188
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 52,221 69,903
---------- ----------
Total current assets 168,135 116,091
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on
the successful efforts accounting method 5,970,397 5,970,397
Accumulated depletion (5,645,635) (5,634,468)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 324,762 335,929
---------- ----------
$ 492,897 $ 452,020
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 13,954 $ 9,780
Partners' capital:
General partners 68,552 57,956
Limited partners (3,441 interests) 410,391 384,284
---------- ----------
478,943 442,240
---------- ----------
$ 492,897 $ 452,020
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 130,711 $ 126,967 $ 271,996 $ 263,297
Interest 766 1,091 1,659 1,896
-------- -------- -------- --------
131,477 128,058 273,655 265,193
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 59,272 56,857 122,071 108,862
General and administrative 3,923 4,126 9,433 8,308
Depletion 5,323 5,572 11,167 11,991
-------- -------- -------- --------
68,518 66,555 142,671 129,161
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 62,959 $ 61,503 $ 130,984 $ 136,032
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
General partners $ 16,538 $ 16,212 $ 34,166 $ 35,807
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 46,421 $ 45,291 $ 96,818 $ 100,225
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 13.49 $ 13.17 $ 28.14 $ 29.13
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
General Limited
partners partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 57,956 $ 384,284 $ 442,240
Distributions (23,570) (70,711) (94,281)
Net income 34,166 96,818 130,984
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 68,552 $ 410,391 $ 478,943
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 130,984 $ 136,032
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 11,167 11,991
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 17,682 (13,930)
Accounts payable 4,174 2,771
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 164,007 136,864
-------- --------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties - (2,799)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (94,281) (138,779)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 69,726 (4,714)
Cash at beginning of period 46,188 53,335
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 115,914 $ 48,621
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1982 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 3% to $271,996 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $263,297 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decline in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 6,884 barrels
6
of oil, 1,723 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 12,402 mcf of gas were
sold, or 10,674 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 7,134 barrels of oil, 3,410 barrels of NGLs and 11,409 mcf of gas
were sold, or 12,446 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased slightly from $27.90 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.93 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.72, or 22%, from $12.30
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.02 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 123% from $1.95 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.34 in the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $142,671 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $129,161 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$13,510, or 10%. This increase was due to increases in production costs and
general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $122,071 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$108,862 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $13,209 increase, or 12%.
The increase was due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate
well production and higher production taxes due to higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
14% from $8,308 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $9,433 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $11,167 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$11,991 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $824, or 7%. This decrease
was due to a decline in oil production of 250 barrels for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 3% to $130,711 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $126,967 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a decrease in production and lower average prices received
for oil. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 3,306 barrels of oil, 1,102
7
barrels of NGLs and 7,207 mcf of gas were sold, or 5,609 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 3,396 barrels of oil, 1,533 barrels of NGLs and
5,105 mcf of gas were sold, or 5,780 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.96, or 3%, from $28.19
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.23 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.55, or
12%, from $12.41 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $13.96 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 47% to
$3.52 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.39 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $68,518 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $66,555 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$1,963, or 3%. This increase was due to higher production costs, offset by
declines in depletion and G&A.
Production costs were $59,272 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$56,857 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $2,415 increase, or 4%. The
increase was due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well
production and higher production taxes due to higher gas and NGL prices.
During this period, G&A decreased 5% from $4,126 for the three months ended June
30, 2000 to $3,923 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to less audit and
tax expenses.
Depletion was $5,323 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$5,572 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $249, or 4%. This decrease was
attributable to a decline in oil production of 90 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $27,143 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $8,462 and a
reduction in working capital of $33,015, offset by increases in production costs
of $13,209 and G&A expenses of $1,125. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $36,705 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $28,243 resulting from the
decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production and increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due
to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated
(limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas
revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
8
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2000 were related to upgrades of oil and gas equipment on active
properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$94,281, of which $23,570 was distributed to the general partners and $70,711 to
the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $138,779, of which $33,539 was distributed to
the general partners and $105,240 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
9
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd.
as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
------- -------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 46,188 $ 53,335
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 69,903 47,611
------- -------
Total current assets 116,091 100,946
------- -------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,970,397 5,967,913
Accumulated depletion (5,634,468) (5,611,986)
Net oil and gas properties 335,929 355,927
------- -------
$ 452,020 $ 456,873
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 9,780 $ 11,302
Partners' capital:
General partners 57,956 54,214
Limited partners (3,441 interests) 384,284 391,357
------- -------
442,240 445,571
$ 452,020 $ 456,873
======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- -------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 562,399 $ 340,246 $ 253,873
Interest 4,310 2,124 3,120
Gain on disposition of assets - 1,922 634
------- ------ --------
566,709 344,292 257,627
------- ------ --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 222,803 198,571 202,485
General and administrative 19,194 14,161 9,538
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 277,671
Depletion 22,482 46,605 252,951
------- ------ --------
264,479 259,337 742,645
------- ------- --------
Net income (loss) $ 302,230 $ 84,955 $ (485,018)
======= ====== ========
Allocation of net income (loss):
General partners $ 78,705 $ 27,431 $ (41,756)
======= ====== ========
Limited partners $ 223,525 $ 57,524 $ (443,262)
======= ====== ========
Net income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 64.96 $ 16.72 $ (128.82)
======= ====== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
General Limited
partners partners Total
--------- ---------- ---------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 106,887 $ 9 13,918 $ 1,020,805
Distributions (16,245) (70,235) (86,480)
Net loss (41,756) (443,262) (485,018)
-------- -------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 48,886 400,421 449,307
Distributions (22,103) (66,588) (88,691)
Net income 27,431 57,524 84,955
-------- -------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 54,214 391,357 445,571
Distributions (74,963) (230,598) (305,561)
Net income 78,705 223,525 302,230
-------- -------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 57,956 $ 384,284 $ 442,240
======== ======== =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 302,230 $ 84,955 $ (485,018)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on disposition of assets - (1,922) (634)
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 277,671
Depletion 22,482 46,605 252,951
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (22,292) (24,579) 19,893
Accounts payable (1,522) 5,081 (6,865)
-------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 300,898 110,140 57,998
-------- -------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (2,484) (1,281) (4,114)
Proceeds from disposition of assets - 2,415 23,382
-------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (2,484) 1,134 19,268
-------- -------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (305,561) (88,691) (86,480)
-------- -------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (7,147) 22,583 (9,214)
Cash at beginning of year 53,335 30,752 39,966
-------- -------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 46,188 $ 53,335 $ 30,752
======== ======== =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 82-III, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a Texas limited
partnership organized in 1982 under the laws of the State of Texas. The
Partnership's general partners are Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
("Pioneer USA") and P&P Employees 82-III, Ltd. ("EMPL"). The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer USA.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
7
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and gas
properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline
in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of its
oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on proved
reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved
8
in the industry. As a result, the Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment
provision of $277,671 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $410,896 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 302,230 $ 84,955 $ (485,018)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for financial
reporting purposes 18,732 42,255 245,110
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 277,671
Other, net (570) (1,597) 787
-------- ------- --------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 320,392 $ 125,613 $ 38,550
======== ======= ========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------ -------
Development costs $ 2,484 $ 1,281 $ 4,114
======= ====== =======
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
--------- ----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 348,798 $ 348,798
Completed wells and equipment 5,621,599 5,619,115
---------- -----------
5,970,397 5,967,913
Accumulated depletion (5,634,468) (5,611,986)
---------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 335,929 $ 355,927
========== ===========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $105,725 $102,247 $ 97,602
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $16,872 $10,207 $ 7,802
Pioneer USA, EMPL and the Partnership are parties to the Partnership
agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership in which Pioneer USA owns 81% and the
remaining portion is owned by former affiliates. Pioneer USA owned 205.34
limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
The costs and revenues of the Partnership are allocated as follows:
General Limited
partners partners
-------- --------
Revenues:
Proceeds from property dispositions prior to cost
recovery 10% 90%
All other Partnership revenues 25% 75%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 10% 90%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 25% 75%
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 290,644 256,851
Revisions (204,881)
Production (19,540) (17,680)
--------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 66,223 74,429
Revisions 243,433
312,763
Production (20,801) (23,061)
--------- ------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 288,855 364,131
Revisions 42,883 (44,362)
Production (20,646) (21,480)
--------- ------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 311,092 298,289
========= ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net revenues
of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64 per
barrel of oil, $13.66 per barrel of NGLs and $7.61 per mcf of gas, discounted at
10% was approximately $2,053,000 and undiscounted was $3,888,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
11
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------ ------- ------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 9,373 $ 7,135 $ 709
Future production costs (5,485) (4,540) (606)
------ ------- ------
3,888 2,595 103
10% annual discount factor (1,835) (1,113) (26)
------ ------- ------
Standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows $ 2,053 $ 1,482 $ 77
====== ======= ======
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------ ------- ------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs$ (340) $ (141) $ (51)
Net changes in prices and production costs 711 355 (718)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 219 1,650 (182)
Accretion of discount 148 8 102
Changes in production rates, timing and other (167) (467) (96)
Change in present value of future
net revenues 571 1,405 (945)
Balance, beginning of year 1,482 77 1,022
------ ------- ------
Balance, end of year $ 2,053 $ 1,482 $ 77
======= ======== =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil and
gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10% of
total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 60% 56% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 14% 15% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 77%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
and TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC were $31,458 and $4,158, respectively, which are
included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the
accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
General partners - The general partners of the Partnership are Pioneer USA
and EMPL. Pioneer USA, the managing general partner, has the power and
authority to manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all
production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly
12
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas
revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the
Partnership.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $6,882,000.
The general partners are required to contribute amounts equal to 10% of
Partnership expenditures for lease acquisition, drilling and completion and
25% of direct, general and administrative and operating expenses.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
(A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 65% to $562,399 for 2000 as
compared to $340,246 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 14,019
barrels of oil, 6,627 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 21,480 mcf of
gas were sold, or 24,226 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 14,043
barrels of oil, 6,758 barrels of NGLs and 23,061 mcf of gas were sold, or 24,645
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.54, or 73%, from
$17.13 in 1999 to $29.67 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $4.73, or 52%, from $9.13 in 1999 to $13.86 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 54% from $1.65 in 1999 to $2.54 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $1,922 was recognized during 1999 from
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $264,479 as compared to $259,337
in 1999, an increase of $5,142, or 2%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $222,803 in 2000 and $198,571 in 1999, resulting in a
$24,232 increase, or 12%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
36% from $14,161 in 1999 to $19,194 in 2000, primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $16,872 in 2000 and $10,207 in
1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $22,482 in 2000 as compared to $46,605 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $24,123, or 52%. This decrease primarily due to a 36,746 barrels of
oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 34% to $340,246 from
$253,873 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received and an increase in production. In 1999, 14,043 barrels of oil, 6,758
barrels of NGLs and 23,061 mcf of gas were sold, or 24,645 BOEs. In 1998, 14,727
barrels of oil, 4,813 barrels of NGLs and 17,680 mcf of gas were sold, or 22,487
BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.82, or 29%, from
$13.31 in 1998 to $17.13 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.71, or 42%, from $6.42 in 1998 to $9.13 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.53 in 1998 to $1.65 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $1,922 and $634 was recognized during 1999
and 1998 from salvage value received on various asset dispositions.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $259,337 as compared to $742,645
in 1998, a decrease of $483,308, or 65%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $198,571 in 1999 and $202,485 in 1998, resulting in a
$3,914 decrease, or 2%. The decrease was due to declines in workover costs and
ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production taxes due to increase oil
and gas sales.
During this period, G&A increased 48% from $9,538 in 1998 to $14,161 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $10,207 in
1999 and $7,802 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $277,671 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $46,605 in 1999 compared to $252,951 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $206,346, or 82%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 164,606 barrels of oil during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $190,758 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $224,339, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $24,233, G&A expenses paid of $5,032 and working capital of $4,316. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $230,886 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $6,547 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to
higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited
to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to upgrades of equipment on various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $2,415 were recognized during 1999 from
salvage value received on disposition of equipment primarily on one oil and gas
well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $305,561, of which $74,963 was
distributed to the general partners and $230,598 to the limited partners. In
1999, cash distributions to the partners were $88,691, of which $22,103 was
distributed to the general partners and $66,588 to the limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 82-III, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 271,996 $ 263,297 $ 562,399 $ 340,246 $ 253,873 $ 456,184 $ 542,331
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 277,671 $ 126,140 $ 5,776
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 36,644
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 130,984 $ 136,032 $ 302,230 $ 84,955 $ (485,018) $ (87,890) $ 197,417
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
General partners $ 34,166 $ 35,807 $ 78,705 $ 27,431 $ (41,756) $ 14,576 $ 64,259
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 96,818 $ 100,225 $ 223,525 $ 57,524 $ (443,262) $ (102,466) $ 133,158
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 28.14 $ 29.13 $ 64.96 $ 16.72 $ (128.82) $ (29.78) $ 38.70
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 20.55 $ 30.58 $ 67.01 $ 19.35 $ 20.41 $ 43.29 $ 49.15(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 492,897 $ 456,897 $ 452,020 $ 456,873 $ 455,528 $1,033,891 $1,323,367
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
---------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $10.65
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
83-A, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 83-A, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 19,505
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 25,908
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 2,661
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 142.17
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.42 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 80.97
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 76.56
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 130.83
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 138.03
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 275
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent the estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to
sell the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership shall continue until terminated in accordance
with the applicable provisions of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 2-81398A
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-1891384
-------------------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................. 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................. 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and 2000......................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements.......................... 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................. 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K....................... 11
Signatures............................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 392,584 $ 169,055
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 229,511 279,239
----------- -----------
Total current assets 622,095 448,294
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 16,902,945 16,901,194
Accumulated depletion (15,665,442) (15,622,262)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,237,503 1,278,932
----------- -----------
$ 1,859,598 $ 1,727,226
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 43,464 $ 33,783
Partners' capital:
General partners 236,728 200,131
Limited partners (19,505 interests) 1,579,406 1,493,312
----------- -----------
1,816,134 1,693,443
----------- -----------
$ 1,859,598 $ 1,727,226
=========== ===========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 471,330 $ 447,770 $ 979,098 $ 864,836
Interest 2,904 2,956 6,256 5,424
-------- -------- -------- --------
474,234 450,726 985,354 870,260
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 239,495 226,945 471,641 443,276
General and administrative 14,392 14,886 33,115 27,789
Depletion 22,631 18,632 43,180 40,238
-------- -------- -------- --------
276,518 260,463 547,936 511,303
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 197,716 $ 190,263 $ 437,418 $ 358,957
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
General partners $ 52,896 $ 50,724 $ 116,436 $ 96,236
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 144,820 $ 139,539 $ 320,982 $ 262,721
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 7.43 $ 7.15 $ 16.46 $ 13.47
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
General Limited
partners partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 200,131 $1,493,312 $1,693,443
Distributions (79,839) (234,888) (314,727)
Net income 116,436 320,982 437,418
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 236,728 $1,579,406 $1,816,134
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 437,418 $ 358,957
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 43,180 40,238
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 49,728 (33,517)
Accounts payable 9,681 16,525
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 540,007 382,203
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,751) (7,921)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (314,727) (373,589)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 223,529 693
Cash at beginning of period 169,055 143,823
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 392,584 $ 144,516
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1983 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. However, these interim results are not
necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may
have been made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June
30, 2001 financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 13% to $979,098 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $864,836 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 20,863 barrels
7
of oil, 8,678 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 52,495 mcf of gas were
sold, or 38,290 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 21,455 barrels of oil, 11,696 barrels of NGLs and 46,838 mcf of
gas were sold, or 40,957 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased slightly from $27.55 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.56 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.36, or 17%, from $14.30
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.66 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 118% from $2.27 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.95 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $547,936 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $511,303 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$36,633, or 7%. This increase was due to higher production costs, general and
administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $471,641 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$443,276 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $28,365 increase, or 6%. The
increase was the primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production and higher production taxes associated with higher oil
and gas prices, offset by a decline in workover expenses.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
19% from $27,789 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $33,115 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $43,180 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$40,238 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $2,942, or 7%. This increase
was primarily due to a decline in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decrease in oil production
of 592 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 5% to $471,330 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $447,770 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a decrease in production and lower average prices received
for oil. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 10,695 barrels of oil, 5,002
barrels of NGLs and 26,788 mcf of gas were sold, or 20,162 BOEs. For the three
8
months ended June 30, 2000, 10,617 barrels of oil, 6,110 barrels of NGLs and
23,850 mcf of gas were sold, or 20,702 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.58, or 2%, from $27.66
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.08 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.48, or 3%, from $14.40
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.88 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 44% to $4.00 for the
three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.77 for the same period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $276,518 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $260,463 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$16,055, or 6%. This increase was due to higher production costs and depletion,
offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $239,495 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$226,945 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $12,550 increase, or 6%.
This increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance expense incurred
to stimulate well production, offset by a decline in workover expenses.
During this period, G&A decreased 3% from $14,886 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $14,392 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to lower
audit and tax expenses.
Depletion was $22,631 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$18,632 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $3,999, or 21%. This
increase was primarily due to a decline in proved reserves during the period
ended June 30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices and an increase in oil
production of 78 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $157,804 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period in 2000. This increase was due
to an increase of $115,094 in oil and gas sales receipts and a reduction of
$76,401 in working capital, offset by increases in production costs of $28,365
and G&A expenses of $5,326. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from
the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an additional
$152,860 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $37,766 resulting from the decline
in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase
in production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production and increased production taxes associated
with higher oil and gas prices, offset by a decline in workover expenses. The
increase in G&A was primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
9
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investment activities during the six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 were related to expenditures for equipment upgrades on active oil
and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$314,727, of which $79,839 was distributed to the general partners and $234,888
to the limited partners. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $373,589, of which $90,377 was distributed to
the general partners and $283,212 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
10
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 8, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
------------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 2-81398A
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-1891384
------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of
the Act: NONE Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES /X/ NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. /X/
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$18,829,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 19,505.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1983 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA")
and its co-general partner is P&P Employees 83-A, Ltd. ("EMPL"), a Texas limited
partnership whose general partner is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer"). As of March 8,
2001, the Partnership had 19,505 limited partnership interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 53% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations. The oil and gas business is
also subject to environmental hazards such as oil spills, gas leaks and ruptures
and discharges of toxic substances or gases that could expose the Partnership to
substantial liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although
the Partnership believes that
2
its business operations do not impair environmental quality and that its costs
of complying with any applicable environmental regulations are not currently
significant, the Partnership cannot predict what, if any, effect these
environmental regulations may have on its current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 69
oil and gas wells. Two wells were dry holes from previous periods, 22 wells have
been sold and three wells have been plugged and abandoned due to unprofitable
operations. At December 31, 2000, 42 wells were producing.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 19,505 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 1,273 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $659,311 and
$181,573, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Operating results:
------------------
Oil and gas sales $ 1,929,701 $ 1,176,562 $ 910,252 $ 1,402,306 $ 1,768,325
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ 430,351 $ 1,194,023 $ --
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 852,211
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Net income (loss) $ 929,165 $ 229,546 $ (784,583) $ (811,642) $ 1,483,261
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Allocation of net income
(loss):
General partners $ 246,105 $ 82,467 $ (52,520) $ (1,662) $ 389,185
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Limited partners $ 683,060 $ 147,079 $ (732,063) $ (809,980) $ 1,094,076
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 35.02 $ 7.54 $ (37.53) $ (41.53) $ 56.09
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 33.80 $ 9.31 $ 20.73 $ 24.50 $ 72.73(a)
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
At year end:
------------
Identifiable assets $ 1,727,226 $ 1,684,906 $ 1,691,709 $ 3,015,116 $ 4,459,272
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of
$34.33 in 1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 64% to $1,929,701 for 2000 as
compared to $1,176,562 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 43,334
barrels of oil, 23,345 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 94,612 mcf of
gas were sold, or 82,448 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 43,654
barrels of oil, 25,584 barrels of NGLs and 109,716 mcf of gas were sold, or
87,524 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.58, or 74%, from
$16.96 in 1999 to $29.54 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.16, or 65%, from $9.42 in 1999 to $15.58 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 70% from $1.78 in 1999 to $3.02 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $1,801 recognized during 1999 was related to
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $1,014,313 as compared to $955,718
in 1999, an increase of $58,595, or 6%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $867,551 in 2000 and $756,020 in 1999, resulting in a
$111,531 increase, or 15%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional workover and well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees, computer
services, postage and managing general partner personnel costs. During this
period, G&A increased 39% from $47,303 in 1999 to $65,724 in 2000 primarily due
to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated
(limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas
revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $57,891 in 2000 and
$35,297 in 1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A
was paid directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines
the allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership
relative to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The
method of allocation has been consistent over the past several years with
certain modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall
business activities.
5
Depletion was $81,038 in 2000 as compared to $152,395 in 1999. This represented
a decrease of $71,357, or 47%. The decrease was primarily due to a 129,265
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 29% to $1,176,562 from
$910,252 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received and an increase in production from 1998 to 1999. In 1999, 43,654
barrels of oil, 25,584 barrels of NGLs and 109,716 mcf of gas were sold, or
87,524 BOEs. In 1998, 46,586 barrels of oil, 21,026 barrels of NGLs and 95,156
mcf of gas were sold, or 83,471 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.62, or 27%, from
$13.34 in 1998 to $16.96 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.93, or 45%, from $6.49 in 1998 to $9.42 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 11% from $1.60 in 1998 to $1.78 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $1,801 recognized during 1999 was related to
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well while the $3,702 gain
recognized during 1998 was from final closing adjustments from the sale during
1997 of 16 oil and gas wells.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $955,718 as compared to $1,715,723
in 1998, a decrease of $760,005, or 44%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties and depletion, offset by
increases in production costs and G&A expenses.
Production costs were $756,020 in 1999 and $731,005 in 1998, resulting in a
$25,015 increase, or 3%. The increase was attributable to additional well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production and production taxes due
to increased oil and gas revenues, offset by a decline in ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 43% from $33,000 in 1998 to $47,303 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $35,297 in
1999 and $27,308 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $430,351 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $152,395 in 1999 compared to $521,367 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $368,972, or 71%. The decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 416,430 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
6
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $620,642 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $760,015, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $111,531, G&A expenses paid of $18,421 and working capital of $9,421. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $849,987 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $89,973 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional workover and well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was
primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions in 1999 of $2,611 were from equipment credits
received on active wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $887,776, of which $228,465 was
distributed to the general partners and $659,311 to the limited partners. In
1999, cash distributions to the partners were $245,794, of which $64,221 was
distributed to the general partners and $181,573 to the limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report................................................................ 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999............................................. 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998....................................................................... 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.......................................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998....................................................................... 13
Notes to Financial Statements............................................................... 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
------------ ------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 169,055 $ 143,823
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 279,239 189,995
------------ ------------
Total current assets 448,294 333,818
------------ ------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 16,901,194 16,892,307
Accumulated depletion (15,622,262) (15,541,219)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties 1,278,932 1,351,088
------------ ------------
$ 1,727,226 $ 1,684,906
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 33,783 $ 32,852
Partners' capital:
General partners 200,131 182,491
Limited partners (19,505 interests) 1,493,312 1,469,563
------------ ------------
1,693,443 1,652,054
------------ ------------
$ 1,727,226 $ 1,684,906
============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 1,929,701 $ 1,176,562 $ 910,252
Interest 13,777 6,901 17,186
Gain on disposition of assets - 1,801 3,702
----------- ----------- -----------
1,943,478 1,185,264 931,140
----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 867,551 756,020 731,005
General and administrative 65,724 47,303 33,000
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 430,351
Depletion 81,038 152,395 521,367
----------- ----------- -----------
1,014,313 955,718 1,715,723
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 929,165 $ 229,546 $ (784,583)
=========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
General partners $ 246,105 $ 82,467 $ (52,520)
=========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 683,060 $ 147,079 $ (732,063)
=========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 35.02 $ 7.54 $ (37.53)
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
General Limited
partners partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 336,024 $ 2,640,444 $ 2,976,468
Distributions (119,259) (404,324) (523,583)
Net loss (52,520) (732,063) (784,583)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 164,245 1,504,057 1,668,302
Distributions (64,221) (181,573) (245,794)
Net income 82,467 147,079 229,546
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 182,491 1,469,563 1,652,054
Distributions (228,465) (659,311) (887,776)
Net income 246,105 683,060 929,165
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 200,131 $ 1,493,312 $ 1,693,443
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 929,165 $ 229,546 $(784,583)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 430,351
Depletion 81,038 152,395 521,367
Gain on disposition of assets - (1,801) (3,702)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (89,244) (88,337) 39,919
Accounts payable 931 9,445 (15,241)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 921,890 301,248 188,111
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (8,882) (8,942) (14,943)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 2,611 271,839
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities (8,882) (6,331) 256,896
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (887,776) (245,794) (523,583)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 25,232 49,123 (78,576)
Cash at beginning of year 143,823 94,700 173,276
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 169,055 $ 143,823 $ 94,700
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1983 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
general partners are Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA") and P&P
Employees 83-A, Ltd. ("EMPL"). The Partnership's managing general partner is
Pioneer USA.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the unit-of-
production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil (dominant
mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants. The
carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
14
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of
15
$430,351 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $1,081,971 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 929,165 $ 229,546 $(784,583)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 72,648 144,177 510,610
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 430,351
Other, net (2,243) (235) 891
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 999,570 $ 373,488 $ 157,269
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Development costs $ 8,882 $ 8,942 $14,943
======= ======= =======
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
------------ ------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 1,000,072 $ 1,000,072
Completed wells and equipment 15,901,122 15,892,235
------------ ------------
16,901,194 16,892,307
Accumulated depletion (15,622,262) (15,541,219)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,278,932 $ 1,351,088
============ ============
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 407,783 $ 397,884 $ 370,984
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 57,891 $ 35,297 $ 27,308
Pioneer USA, EMPL and the Partnership are parties to the partnership
agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership in which Pioneer USA owns 79% and the
remaining portion is owned by former affiliates. In addition, Pioneer USA owned
676 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
The costs and revenues of the Partnership are allocated as follows:
General Limited
partners partners
-------- --------
Revenues:
Proceeds from property dispositions prior to cost
recovery 10% 90%
All other Partnership revenues 25% 75%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 10% 90%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 25% 75%
Incremental direct expenses - 100%
Incremental direct expenses are direct expenses which would not be
incurred except for the requirements of the securities regulatory authorities.
Such expenses totaled $7,833, $12,006 and $5,692 in 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 765,491 1,179,867
Revisions (361,806) (528,746)
Production (67,612) (95,156)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 336,073 555,965
Revisions 714,690 1,245,944
Production (69,238) (109,716)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 981,525 1,692,193
Revisions 124,418 (56,128)
Production (66,679) (94,612)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 1,039,264 1,541,453
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.61
per barrel
17
of oil, $13.13 per barrel of NGLs and $7.87 per mcf of gas, discounted at 10%
was approximately $7,532,000 and undiscounted was $14,892,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 34,721 $ 24,100 $ 3,651
Future production costs (19,829) (14,511) (2,932)
--------- --------- ---------
14,892 9,589 719
10% annual discount factor (7,360) (4,422) (207)
--------- --------- ---------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 7,532 $ 5,167 $ 512
========= ========= =========
18
For the years ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (1,062) $ (421) $ (179)
Net changes in prices and production costs 2,717 1,751 (1,843)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 713 4,985 (450)
Accretion of discount 517 51 285
Changes in production rates, timing and other (520) (1,711) (151)
-------- -------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 2,365 4,655 (2,338)
-------- -------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 5,167 512 2,850
-------- -------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 7,532 $ 5,167 $ 512
======== ======== ========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 53% 52% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 64%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 5% 17%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $100,032 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
General partners - The general partners of the Partnership are Pioneer
USA and EMPL. Pioneer USA, the managing general partner, has the power
and authority to manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs.
As managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's
properties, all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and
billed to the Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas
revenues are received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of
the oil and gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to
being paid to the Partnership.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$19,505,000. The general partners are required to contribute amounts
equal to 10% of Partnership expenditures for lease acquisition, drilling
and
19
completion and 25% of direct, general and administrative and operating
expenses.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts
21
Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981 from the
University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business Development
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief Financial
Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr. Dove joined
Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and was promoted
to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in which
position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley, Mr.
Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus Energy
Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. Under the
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA pays 8% of the Partnership's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 20% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated 20% of the
Partnership's revenues.
EMPL is a co-general partner of the Partnership. Under this arrangement, EMPL
pays 2% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 5%
of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, EMPL is
allocated 5% of the Partnership's revenues. EMPL does not receive any fees or
reimbursements from the Partnership.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
and EMPL respectively own 80% and 20% of the general partners' interests in the
Partnership. Pioneer USA owned 676 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
23
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $407,783 $397,884 $370,984
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 57,891 $ 35,297 $ 27,308
Under the limited partnership agreement, the general partners, Pioneer USA and
EMPL, together pay 10% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion
costs and 25% of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In
return, they are allocated 25% of the Partnership's revenues. Twenty percent of
the general partners' share of costs and revenues is allocated to EMPL and the
remainder is allocated to Pioneer USA. Certain former affiliates of Pioneer USA
are limited partners of EMPL. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Partnership.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
Dated: March 23, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
----------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 23, 2001
--------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 23, 2001
-------------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 23, 2001
-------------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 23, 2001
-------------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 23, 2001
-------------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 23, 2001
-------------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to
Item 14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3.1 Agreement of Limited Partnership of -
Parker & Parsley 83-A, Ltd. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4(e) of Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 2-81398A), as amended
on April 26, 1983, the effective date thereof
(hereinafter called, the Partnership's
Registration Statement)
3.2 Amended and Restated Certificate of -
Limited Partnership of Parker & Parsley 83-A,
Ltd. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
of the Partnership's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the period from July 1, 1983 (date
of organization) through December 31, 1983
4.1 Form of Subscription Agreement and -
Power of Attorney incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4(b) of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4.2 Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4(d) of the Partnership's Registration Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-A, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 979,098 $ 864,836 $1,929,701 $1,176,562 $ 910,252 $1,402,306 $1,768,325
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 430,351 $1,194,023 $ --
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 852,211
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 437,418 $ 358,957 $ 929,165 $ 229,546 $ (784,583) $ (811,642) $1,483,261
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
General partners $ 116,436 $ 96,236 $ 246,105 $ 82,467 $ (52,520) $ (1,662) $ 389,185
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 320,982 $ 262,721 $ 683,060 $ 147,079 $ (732,063) $ (809,980) $1,094,076
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 16.46 $ 13.47 $ 35.02 $ 7.54 $ (37.53) $ (41.53) $ 56.09
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 12.04 $ 14.52 $ 33.80 $ 9.31 $ 20.73 $ 24.50 $ 72.73(a)
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 1,859,598 $1,686,799 $1,727,226 $1,684,906 $1,691,709 $3,015,116 $4,459,272
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $34.33
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
83-B, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 83-B, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 23,370
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 35,807
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 3,565
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 159.87
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.70 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 85.77
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 83.30
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 147.79
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 155.25
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 225
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent the estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to
sell the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership shall continue until terminated in accordance
with the applicable provisions of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 2-81398B
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-1907245
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- -----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000...................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000..................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001..................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and 2000............................ 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................. 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations..................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.......................... 11
Signatures................................................ 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 491,644 $ 224,865
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 246,453 369,349
----------- -----------
Total current assets 738,097 594,214
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 18,964,252 18,957,070
Accumulated depletion (17,300,181) (17,248,214)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,664,071 1,708,856
----------- -----------
$ 2,402,168 $ 2,303,070
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 56,318 $ 39,862
Partners' capital:
General partners 341,357 316,574
Limited partners (23,370 interests) 2,004,493 1,946,634
----------- -----------
2,345,850 2,263,208
----------- -----------
$ 2,402,168 $ 2,303,070
=========== ===========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ------------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- ---------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 519,120 $ 545,418 $1,086,570 $1,095,887
Interest 3,685 5,180 7,940 9,089
Gain on disposition of assets 10,923 1,428 10,923 5,351
-------- -------- --------- ---------
533,728 552,026 1,105,433 1,110,327
-------- -------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 306,551 247,177 584,983 480,127
General and administrative 15,891 17,899 36,427 34,788
Depletion 27,493 22,471 51,967 52,331
-------- -------- --------- ---------
349,935 287,547 673,377 567,246
-------- -------- --------- ---------
Net income $ 183,793 $ 264,479 $ 432,056 $ 543,081
======== ======== ========= =========
Allocation of net income:
General partners $ 48,513 $ 69,659 $ 114,788 $ 143,294
======== ======== ========= =========
Limited partners $ 135,280 $ 194,820 $ 317,268 $ 399,787
======== ======== ========= =========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 5.79 $ 8.34 $ 13.58 $ 17.11
======== ======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
General Limited
partners partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 316,574 $1,946,634 $2,263,208
Distributions (90,005) (259,409) (349,414)
Net income 114,788 317,268 432,056
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 341,357 $2,004,493 $2,345,850
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 432,056 $ 543,081
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 51,967 52,331
Gain on disposition of assets (10,923) (5,351)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 122,896 (21,372)
Accounts payable 16,456 21,923
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 612,452 590,612
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (7,182) (5,122)
Proceeds from asset disposition 10,923 5,358
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities 3,741 236
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (349,414) (574,504)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 266,779 16,344
Cash at beginning of period 224,865 244,091
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 491,644 $ 260,435
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of organization
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1983 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 1% to $1,086,570 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $1,095,887 for the same period in
2000. The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in production and lower
average prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
gas and NGLs. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 23,078 barrels of oil,
7
10,759 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 56,204 mcf of gas were sold,
or 43,204 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 25,927 barrels of oil, 16,013 barrels of NGLs and 70,252 mcf of gas were
sold, or 53,649 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.15, or 1%, from $27.78
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.63 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.54, or 18%, from
$14.10 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.64 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 125% from $2.13
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.80 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
A gain on disposition of assets of $10,923 was recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2001 from salvage income received on a well that was plugged and
abandoned in the prior year. A gain of $5,351 was recognized during the same
period ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits received on a fully depleted
well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $673,377 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $567,246 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$106,131, or 19%. This increase resulted from higher production costs and
general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $584,983 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$480,127 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $104,856 increase, or 22%.
The increase was primarily due to additional workover and well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
5% from $34,788 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $36,427 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to increased audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $51,967 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$52,331 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $364, or 1%. This decrease
was primarily due to a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long- Lived
Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121") during the fourth quarter of 2000 and a
decline in oil production of 2,849 barrels for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
8
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 7, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 5% to $519,120 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $545,418 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in production and lower average
prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 12,473 barrels of oil, 5,587
barrels of NGLs and 26,602 mcf of gas were sold, or 22,494 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 12,194 barrels of oil, 7,964 barrels of NGLs and
34,873 mcf of gas were sold, or 25,970 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.92, or 3%, from $27.91
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.99 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased slightly
from $14.72 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.76 for the same
period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 49% from
$2.52 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.76 for the same period
in 2001.
A gain on disposition of assets of $10,923 was recognized during the three
months ended June 30, 2001 from salvage income received on a well that was
plugged and abandoned in the prior year. A gain of $1,428 was recognized during
the same period ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits received on a fully
depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $349,935 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $287,547 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$62,388, or 22%. This increase was due to higher production costs and depletion,
offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $306,551 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$247,177 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $59,374 increase, or 24%.
This increase was primarily due to additional workover and well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate production.
During this period, G&A decreased 11% from $17,899 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $15,891 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to decreased
audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $27,493 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$22,471 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $5,022, or 22%. This
increase was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves for the period
ended June 30, 2000 due to lower commodity prices and an increase in oil
production of 279 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 compared to
the same period in 2000.
9
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $21,840 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period in 2000. This increase was due
to a reduction of $138,801 in working capital, offset by increases in production
costs of $104,856 and G&A expenses of $1,639 and a decline of $10,466 in oil and
gas sales receipts. The decrease in oil and gas receipts resulted from a decline
of $233,580 in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000 and
a decline in oil prices of $3,664, offset by an increase in gas and NGL prices
of $226,778 during 2001. The increase in production costs was primarily due to
additional workover and well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well
production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to increased audit and tax
fees.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 were for expenditures related to oil and gas equipment upgrades on
active properties.
Proceeds from asset disposition of $10,923 and $5,358 were received during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The proceeds received
during the period in 2001 were due to salvage income received on a well plugged
and abandoned in the prior year. The proceeds received during the period in 2000
were for equipment credits on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$349,414, of which $90,005 was distributed to the general partners and $259,409
to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $574,504, of which $144,738 was distributed
to the general partners and $429,766 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
10
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 7, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 2-81398B
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-1907245
--------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of
the Act: NONE Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES /X/ NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. /X/
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$22,493,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 23,370.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1983 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA")
and its co-general partner is P&P Employees 83-B, Ltd. ("EMPL"), a Texas limited
partnership whose general partner is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer"). As of March 8,
2001, the Partnership had 23,370 limited partnership interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 46%, 13% and 10% were attributable to
sales made to Plains Marketing, L.P., TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and Phillips
Petroleum Company, respectively. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of
any one purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its
oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations. The oil and gas business is
also subject to environmental hazards such as oil spills, gas leaks and ruptures
and discharges of toxic substances or gases that could expose the Partnership to
substantial liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although
the Partnership believes that
2
its business operations do not impair environmental quality and that its costs
of complying with any applicable environmental regulations are not currently
significant, the Partnership cannot predict what, if any, effect these
environmental regulations may have on its current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in Texas were acquired by the Partnership, resulting in the
Partnership's participation in the drilling of 59 productive oil and gas wells.
At December 31, 2000, the Partnership had 41 producing wells. Thirteen wells
have been plugged and abandoned due to unprofitable operations and five wells
were sold.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 23,370 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 1,379 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $942,688 and
$325,903, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Operating results:
------------------
Oil and gas sales $ 2,376,791 $ 1,548,013 $ 1,267,241 $ 1,924,748 $ 2,291,605
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,392,304
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ 84,697 $ 152,505 $ 362,325 $ 1,171,409 $ -
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Net income (loss) $ 1,174,971 $ 292,874 $ (871,809) $ (754,107) $ 2,309,638
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Allocation of net
income (loss):
General partners $ 325,015 $ 125,187 $ (46,980) $ 56,351 $ 578,911
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Limited partners $ 849,956 $ 167,687 $ (824,829) $ (810,458) $ 1,730,727
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per
limited partnership
interest $ 36.37 $ 7.18 $ (35.29) $ (34.68) $ 74.06
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Limited partners' cash
distributions per
limited partnership
interest $ 40.34 $ 13.95 $ 11.49 $ 32.48 $ 80.43(a)
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
At year end:
------------
Identifiable assets $ 2,303,070 $ 2,391,541 $ 2,529,136 $ 3,774,504 $ 5,537,639
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of
$46.83 in 1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 54% to $2,376,791 for 2000 as
compared to $1,548,013 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 51,895
barrels of oil, 29,919 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 132,106 mcf
of gas were sold, or 103,832 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 54,446
barrels of oil, 35,000 barrels of NGLs and 157,842 mcf of gas were sold, or
115,753 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in
the future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.51, or 73%, from
$17.18 in 1999 to $29.69 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.47, or 55%, from $10.00 in 1999 to $15.47 in 2000. The average
price received per mcf of gas increased 70% from $1.66 in 1999 to $2.83 in 2000.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $7,482 during 2000 was due to salvage income
received on one well plugged and abandoned during the current year. A gain of
$3,375 during 1999 was recognized from equipment credits received on one fully
depleted well.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 2000 to $1,230,645 as compared to
$1,270,634 in 1999, a decrease of $39,989, or 3%. The decrease was primarily due
to declines in depletion and the impairment of oil and gas properties, offset by
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $947,439 in 2000 and $879,335 in 1999, resulting in a
$68,104 increase, or 8%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees, and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
35% from $58,993 in 1999 to $79,646 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $71,304 in 2000 and $46,440 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized
non-cash charges of $84,697 and $152,505 related to its oil and gas properties
during 2000 and 1999, respectively.
5
Depletion was $106,841 in 2000 as compared to $179,801 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $72,960, or 41%. This decrease was primarily due to a 115,324
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1999.
Abandoned property costs of $12,022 during 2000 was related to the plugging and
abandonment of one well during the current year.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 22% to $1,548,013 from
$1,267,241 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 54,446 barrels of oil,
35,000 barrels of NGLs and 157,842 mcf of gas were sold, or 115,753 BOEs. In
1998, 62,162 barrels of oil, 31,533 barrels of NGLs and 147,495 mcf of gas were
sold, or 118,278 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.88, or 29%, from
$13.30 in 1998 to $17.18 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.21, or 47%, from $6.79 in 1998 to $10.00 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.54 in 1998 to $1.66 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $3,375 during 1999 was recognized from
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well. During 1998, a gain on
disposition of assets of $157 was recognized from post closing adjustments
received from the sale of two oil and gas wells and an overriding royalty
interest on one well during 1997.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $1,270,634 as compared to
$2,152,425 in 1998, a decrease of $881,791, or 41%. The decrease was primarily
due to declines in depletion, the impairment of oil and gas properties and
production costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $879,335 in 1999 and $978,080 in 1998, resulting in a
$98,745 decrease, or 10%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production taxes due to an
increase in oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 36% from $43,488 in 1998 to $58,993 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $46,440 in
1999 and $38,017 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized non-cash SFAS 121 charges of $152,505 and $362,325
related to its oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Depletion was $179,801 in 1999 compared to $768,532 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $588,731, or 77%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 430,250 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with
6
SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of
7,716 barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period
in 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $733,136 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $838,001, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $68,104, G&A expenses paid of $20,653, $12,022 in abandoned property costs
paid and working capital of $4,086. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an
additional $1,065,062 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $227,061 resulting from
the decline in production during 2000. The increase in production costs was
primarily due to increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas
prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the
managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were for
expenditures related to oil and gas equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $7,482 recognized during 2000 were related
to salvage income received on one well plugged and abandoned during the current
year. Proceeds of $3,845 recognized during 1999 were primarily from equipment
credits received on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $1,260,369, of which $317,681
was distributed to the general partners and $942,688 to the limited partners. In
1999, cash distributions to the partners were $438,977, of which $113,074 was
distributed to the general partners and $325,903 to the limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report................................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999................................................ 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998.......................................................................... 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998............................................................. 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998.......................................................................... 14
Notes to Financial Statements.................................................................. 15
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
------------ ------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 224,865 $ 244,091
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 369,349 263,774
------------ ------------
Total current assets 594,214 507,865
------------ ------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 18,957,070 19,500,569
Accumulated depletion (17,248,214) (17,616,893)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties 1,708,856 1,883,676
------------ ------------
$ 2,303,070 $ 2,391,541
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 39,862 $ 42,935
Partners' capital:
General partners 316,574 309,240
Limited partners (23,370 interests) 1,946,634 2,039,366
------------ ------------
2,263,208 2,348,606
------------ ------------
$ 2,303,070 $ 2,391,541
============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 2,376,791 $ 1,548,013 $ 1,267,241
Interest 21,343 12,120 13,218
Gain on disposition of assets 7,482 3,375 157
----------- ----------- -----------
2,405,616 1,563,508 1,280,616
----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 947,439 879,335 978,080
General and administrative 79,646 58,993 43,488
Impairment of oil and gas properties 84,697 152,505 362,325
Depletion 106,841 179,801 768,532
Abandoned property 12,022 - -
----------- ----------- -----------
1,230,645 1,270,634 2,152,425
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 1,174,971 $ 292,874 $ (871,809)
=========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
General partners $ 325,015 $ 125,187 $ (46,980)
=========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 849,956 $ 167,687 $ (824,829)
=========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 36.37 $ 7.18 $ (35.29)
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
General Limited
partners partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 435,525 $ 3,290,919 $ 3,726,444
Distributions (91,418) (268,508) (359,926)
Net loss (46,980) (824,829) (871,809)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 297,127 2,197,582 2,494,709
Distributions (113,074) (325,903) (438,977)
Net income 125,187 167,687 292,874
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 309,240 2,039,366 2,348,606
Distributions (317,681) (942,688) (1,260,369)
Net income 325,015 849,956 1,174,971
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 316,574 $ 1,946,634 $ 2,263,208
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 1,174,971 $ 292,874 $ (871,809)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 84,697 152,505 362,325
Depletion 106,841 179,801 768,532
Gain on disposition of assets (7,482) (3,375) (157)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (105,575) (113,070) 72,320
Accounts payable (3,073) 8,508 (13,633)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,250,379 517,243 317,578
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (16,718) (11,719) (27,705)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 7,482 3,845 10,974
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities (9,236) (7,874) (16,731)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (1,260,369) (438,977) (359,926)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (19,226) 70,392 (59,079)
Cash at beginning of year 244,091 173,699 232,778
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash at end of year $ 224,865 $ 244,091 $ 173,699
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1983 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
general partners are Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA") and P&P
Employees 83-B, Ltd. ("EMPL"). The Partnership's managing general partner is
Pioneer USA.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the unit-of-
production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil (dominant
mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants. The
carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited
14
partnership interest is calculated by using the number of outstanding limited
partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non- partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $84,697, $152,505 and
$362,325 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000, 1999 and
1998,
15
respectively.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $1,137,401 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 1,174,971 $ 292,874 $ (871,809)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 90,760 163,887 749,857
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 84,697 152,505 362,325
Salvage income - - 422
Other, net (7,657) (1,145) 7,474
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 1,342,771 $ 608,121 $ 248,269
=========== =========== ===========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
Development costs $ 16,718 $ 11,719 $ 27,705
========== ========== ==========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
------------ ------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 911,105 $ 946,730
Completed wells and equipment 18,045,965 18,553,839
------------ ------------
18,957,070 19,500,569
Accumulated depletion (17,248,214) (17,616,893)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,708,856 $ 1,883,676
============ ============
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 426,573 $ 424,831 $ 426,899
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 71,304 $ 46,440 $ 38,017
Pioneer USA, EMPL and the Partnership are parties to the partnership
agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership in which Pioneer USA owns 79% and the
remaining portion is owned by former affiliates. In addition, Pioneer USA owned
877 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
The costs and revenues of the Partnership are allocated as follows:
General Limited
partners partners
-------- --------
Revenues:
Proceeds from property dispositions prior to cost
recovery 10% 90%
All other Partnership revenues 25% 75%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 10% 90%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 25% 75%
Incremental direct expenses - 100%
Incremental direct expenses are direct expenses which would not be
incurred except for the requirements of the securities regulatory authorities
and totaled $8,342, $12,553 and $5,471 in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 1,215,076 1,717,779
Revisions (498,218) (464,099)
Production (93,695) (147,495)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 623,163 1,106,185
Revisions 738,384 1,321,692
Production (89,446) (157,842)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 1,272,101 2,270,035
Revisions 82,614 (66,662)
Production (81,814) (132,106)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 1,272,901 2,071,267
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.32 per barrel of NGLs and $7.73 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $9,555,000 and undiscounted was $18,817,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
18
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 43,776 $ 31,312 $ 6,816
Future production costs (24,959) (18,234) (5,169)
-------- -------- --------
18,817 13,078 1,647
10% annual discount factor (9,262) (6,181) (544)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 9,555 $ 6,897 $ 1,103
======== ======== ========
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $(1,429) $ (669) $ (289)
Net changes in prices and production costs 3,342 3,109 (3,208)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 439 5,091 (627)
Accretion of discount 690 110 489
Changes in production rates, timing and other (384) (1,847) (147)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 2,658 5,794 (3,782)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 6,897 1,103 4,885
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 9,555 $ 6,897 $ 1,103
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 46% 42% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 13% 14% -
Phillips Petroleum Company 10% 3% 3%
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 60%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 8% 29%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing,
L.P., TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC Inc. and Phillips Petroleum Company were $112,877,
$29,666 and $22,742, respectively, which are included in the caption "Accounts
receivable - oil and gas sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
19
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
General partners - The general partners of the Partnership are Pioneer
USA and EMPL. Pioneer USA, the managing general partner, has the power
and authority to manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs.
As managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's
properties, all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and
billed to the Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas
revenues are received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of
the oil and gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to
being paid to the Partnership.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$23,370,000. The general partners are required to contribute amounts
equal to 10% of Partnership expenditures for lease acquisition, drilling
and completion and 25% of direct, general and administrative and
operating expenses.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 45 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. Under the
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA pays 8% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 20% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated 20% of the
Program's revenues.
EMPL is a co-general partner of the Partnership. Under this arrangement, EMPL
pays 2% of the Program's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 5% of
its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, EMPL is
allocated 5% of the Program's revenues. EMPL does not receive any fees or
reimbursements from the Partnership.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
and EMPL respectively own 80% and 20% of the general partners' interests in the
Partnership. Pioneer USA owned 877 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
23
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 426,573 $ 424,831 $ 426,899
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 71,304 $ 46,440 $ 38,017
Under the limited partnership agreement, the general partners, Pioneer USA and
EMPL, together pay 10% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion
costs and 25% of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In
return, they are allocated 25% of the Partnership's revenues. Twenty percent of
the general partners' share of costs and revenues is allocated to EMPL and the
remainder is allocated to Pioneer USA. Certain former affiliates of Pioneer USA
are limited partners of EMPL. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Partnership.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
Dated: March 29, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
----------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 29, 2001
--------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 29, 2001
-------------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 29, 2001
-------------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 29, 2001
-------------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 29, 2001
-------------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 29, 2001
-------------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to
Item 14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3.1 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parker -
& Parsley 83-B, Ltd. incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4(e) of Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
2-81398B), as amended on April 26, 1983,
the effective date thereof (hereinafter called,
the Partnership's Registration Statement)
3.2 Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited -
Partnership of Parker & Parsley 83-B, Ltd.
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the
Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period from July 1, 1983 (date of organization)
through December 31, 1983
4.1 Form of Subscription Agreement and Power of -
Attorney incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)
of the Partnership's Registration Statement
4.2 Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d)
of the Partnership's Registration Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 83-B, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $1,086,570 $1,095,887 $2,376,791 $1,548,013 $1,267,241 $1,924,748 $2,291,605
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $1,392,304
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 84,697 $ 152,505 $ 362,325 $1,171,409 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 432,056 $ 543,081 $1,174,971 $ 292,874 $ (871,809) $ (754,107) $2,309,638
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
General partners $ 114,788 $ 143,294 $ 325,015 $ 125,187 $ (46,980) $ 56,351 $ 578,911
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 317,268 $ 399,787 $ 849,956 $ 167,687 $ (824,829) $ (810,458) $1,730,727
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per
limited partnership
interest $ 13.58 $ 17.11 $ 36.37 $ 7.18 $ (35.29) $ (34.68) $ 74.06
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per
limited partnership
interest $ 11.10 $ 18.39 $ 40.34 $ 13.95 $ 11.49 $ 32.48 $ 80.43(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $2,402,168 $2,382,041 $2,303,070 $2,391,541 $2,529,136 $3,774,504 $5,537,639
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $46.83
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
84-A, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 84-A, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 19,435
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 28,598
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 3,742
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 199.06
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.68 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 111.99
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 106.99
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 184.53
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 193.24
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 270
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its
partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2) (A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent the estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to
sell the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership shall continue until terminated in accordance
with the applicable provisions of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 2-90417
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-1974814
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and 2000........................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 497,847 $ 179,539
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 247,028 360,844
----------- -----------
Total current assets 744,875 540,383
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 18,264,695 18,260,776
Accumulated depletion (16,449,041) (16,391,831)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,815,654 1,868,945
----------- -----------
$ 2,560,529 $ 2,409,328
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 47,293 $ 36,496
Partners' capital:
General partners 336,712 293,504
Limited partners (19,435 interests) 2,176,524 2,079,328
----------- -----------
2,513,236 2,372,832
----------- -----------
$ 2,560,529 $ 2,409,328
=========== ===========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
------------------------ ------------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 476,179 $ 549,309 $1,110,822 $1,082,369
Interest 3,705 4,294 7,360 6,992
--------- --------- --------- ---------
479,884 553,603 1,118,182 1,089,361
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 261,190 245,145 509,980 464,779
General and administrative 14,541 19,804 36,760 34,139
Depletion 29,102 25,167 57,210 58,813
--------- --------- --------- ---------
304,833 290,116 603,950 557,731
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income $ 175,051 $ 263,487 $ 514,232 $ 531,630
========= ========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income:
General partners $ 48,192 $ 69,972 $ 137,658 $ 142,146
========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 126,859 $ 193,515 $ 376,574 $ 389,484
========= ========= ========= =========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 6.53 $ 9.96 $ 19.38 $ 20.04
========= ========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
General Limited
partners partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 293,504 $2,079,328 $2,372,832
Distributions (94,450) (279,378) (373,828)
Net income 137,658 376,574 514,232
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 336,712 $2,176,524 $2,513,236
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 514,232 $ 531,630
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 57,210 58,813
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 113,816 (33,685)
Accounts payable 10,797 22,835
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 696,055 579,593
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (3,919) (11,126)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (373,828) (507,986)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 318,308 60,481
Cash at beginning of period 179,539 117,140
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 497,847 $ 177,621
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1984 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 3% to $1,110,822 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $1,082,369 for the same period in
2000. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for
gas and NGLs, offset by a decrease in production and lower average prices
7
received for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 26,035 barrels of oil,
12,266 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 57,564 mcf of gas were sold,
or 47,895 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 26,759 barrels of oil, 16,307 barrels of NGLs and 68,163 mcf of gas were
sold, or 54,427 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.61, or 2%, from $27.63
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.02 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.95, or 7%, from $13.27
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.22 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 117% from $1.86 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.04 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $603,950 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $557,731 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$46,219, or 8%. This increase was primarily due to increases in production costs
and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in
depletion.
Production costs were $509,980 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$464,779 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $45,201 increase, or 10%.
The increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
8% from $34,139 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $36,760 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $57,210 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$58,813 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $1,603, or 3%. This decrease
was the result of a decline in oil production of 724 barrels for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 compared to the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 13% to $476,179 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $549,309 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and lower
average prices received for oil and NGLs, offset by higher average prices
received for gas. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 12,406 barrels of
oil, 5,875 barrels of NGLs and 24,014 mcf of gas were sold, or 22,283 BOEs. For
8
the three months ended June 30, 2000, 13,188 barrels of oil, 8,087 barrels of
NGLs and 33,092 mcf of gas were sold, or 26,790 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.78, or 3%, from $27.65
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.87 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $1.77, or
13%, from $13.84 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $12.07 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 36% to
$2.99 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.20 for the same period in
2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $304,833 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $290,116 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$14,717, or 5%. This increase was primarily due to increases in production costs
and depletion, offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $261,190 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$245,145 for the same period in 2000 resulting in an increase of $16,045, or 7%.
The increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 27% from $19,804 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $14,541 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues and a
decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $29,102 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$25,167 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $3,935, or 16%. This
increase was the result of a reduction in revisions to proved reserves during
the period ended June 30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices, offset by
a decline in oil production of 782 barrels for the three months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $116,462 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase of $28,821 in oil and gas sales receipts and a
reduction in working capital of $135,463, offset by increases in production
costs of $45,201 and G&A expenses of $2,621. The increase in oil and gas
receipts resulted from the increase in gas and NGL prices of $164,517 during
2001, offset by $119,533 resulting from the decline in production and a $16,163
decline resulting from lower oil prices during 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to additional
well maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production. The
increase in G&A was primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
9
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were for expenditures related to oil and gas equipment
upgrades on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$373,828, of which $94,450 was distributed to the general partners and $279,378
to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $507,986, of which $129,953 was distributed
to the general partners and $378,033 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
10
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 6, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 2-90417
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-1974814
------------------------------------------ ---------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES \ X \ NO \ \
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. \ X \
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-s of the Registrant is $19,016,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 19,435.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1984 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA")
and its co-general partner is P&P Employees 84-A, Ltd. ("EMPL"), a Texas limited
partnership whose general partner is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer"). As of March 8,
2001, the Partnership had 19,435 limited partnership interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers. Of the Partnership's total oil and
gas revenues for 2000, approximately 35%, 17% and 10% were attributable to sales
made to Plains Marketing, L.P., TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and NGTS LLC, respectively.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not have
an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs")
and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations. The oil and gas business is
also subject to environmental hazards such as oil spills, gas leaks and ruptures
and discharges of toxic substances or gases that could expose the Partnership to
substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental and exploratory oil and gas
prospects located primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were
acquired by the Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the
drilling of 42 oil and gas wells. At December 31, 2000, 38 wells were producing
and four wells had been plugged and abandoned due to unprofitable operations.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 19,435 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 1,268 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $872,006 and
$293,145, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $2,348,261 $1,419,376 $1,124,134 $1,668,018 $1,984,346
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ - $ - $ 425,668 $ 370,361 $ -
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ - $ - $ - $ - $1,055,353
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) $1,240,674 $ 340,062 $ (923,346) $ 70,124 $1,782,138
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
General partners $ 328,079 $ 113,550 $ (56,570) $ 121,907 $ 462,041
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 912,595 $ 226,512 $ (866,776) $ (51,783) $1,320,097
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 46.96 $ 11.65 $ (44.60) $ (2.66) $ 67.92
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 44.87 $ 15.08 $ 12.82 $ 32.32 $ 73.68 (a)
========= ========== ========= ========= ========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $2,409,328 $2,343,035 $2,390,810 $3,657,643 $4,436,385
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $42.48
in 1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 65% to $2,348,261 for 2000 as
compared to $1,419,376 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 51,863
barrels of oil, 33,622 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 138,617 mcf
of gas were sold, or 108,588 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 50,064
barrels of oil, 35,804 barrels of NGLs and 154,235 mcf of gas were sold, or
111,574 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in
the future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.19, or 70%, from
$17.36 in 1999 to $29.55 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $4.97, or 55%, from $9.03 in 1999 to $14.00 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 69% from $1.47 in 1999 to $2.49 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility in the foreseeable future. The
Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at average
prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $1,124,923 as compared to
$1,088,550 in 1999, an increase of $36,373, or 3%. The increase was primarily
due to increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses
("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $937,743 in 2000 and $859,602 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $78,141 or 9%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production, offset by lower well maintenance costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
45% from $53,481 in 1999 to $77,459 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $70,448 in 2000 and $42,581 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
Depletion was $109,721 in 2000 as compared to $175,467 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $65,746, or 37%. This decrease was primarily due to a 150,475
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 26% to $1,419,376 from
$1,124,134 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 50,064 barrels of oil,
35,804 barrels of NGLs and 154,235 mcf of gas were sold, or 111,574 BOEs. In
1998, 54,153 barrels of oil, 34,549 barrels of NGLs and 145,870 mcf of gas were
sold, or 113,014 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $4.06, or 31%, from
$13.30 in 1998 to $17.36 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.95, or 49%, from $6.08 in 1998 to $9.03 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 11% from $1.33 in 1998 to $1.47 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $2,100 was recognized during 1998 from the
sale of equipment on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $1,088,550 as compared to
$2,059,738 in 1998, a decrease of $971,188, or 47%. The decrease was primarily
due to declines in depletion, the impairment of oil and gas properties and
production costs, offset by an increase in G&A expenses.
Production costs were $859,602 in 1999 and $865,247 in 1998, resulting in a
$5,645 decrease. The decrease was due to declines in workover costs and ad
valorem taxes, offset by increases in well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production and in production taxes due to increased oil and gas
revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 39% from $38,385 in 1998 to $53,481 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $42,581 in
1999 and $33,724 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $425,668 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $175,467 in 1999 compared to $730,438 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $554,971, or 76%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 445,239 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
6
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $852,554 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $936,985 and a decline in working capital of $17,688,
offset by increases in production costs paid of $78,141 and G&A expenses paid of
$23,978. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in
commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an additional $953,265 to oil and
gas receipts, offset by $16,280 resulting from the decline in production during
2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production, offset by lower well maintenance costs. The increase
in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's
G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of
increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to
expenditures for equipment upgrades on various oil and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $1,173,468, of which $301,462
was distributed to the general partners and $872,006 to the limited partners. In
1999, cash distributions to the partners were $392,295, of which $99,150 was
distributed to the general partners and $293,145 to the limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 13
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
------------- -------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 179,539 $ 117,140
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 360,844 261,763
------------ ------------
Total current assets 540,383 378,903
------------ ------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 18,260,776 18,246,242
Accumulated depletion (16,391,831) (16,282,110)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties 1,868,945 1,964,132
------------ ------------
$ 2,409,328 $ 2,343,035
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - $ 36,496 $ 37,409
Partners' capital:
General partners 293,504 266,887
Limited partners (19,435 interests) 2,079,328 2,038,739
------------ ------------
2,372,832 2,305,626
------------ ------------
$ 2,409,328 $ 2,343,035
============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 2,348,261 $ 1,419,376 $ 1,124,134
Interest 17,336 9,236 10,158
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- 2,100
----------- ----------- -----------
2,365,597 1,428,612 1,136,392
----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 937,743 859,602 865,247
General and administrative 77,459 53,481 38,385
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 425,668
Depletion 109,721 175,467 730,438
----------- ----------- -----------
1,124,923 1,088,550 2,059,738
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 1,240,674 $ 340,062 $ (923,346)
=========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
General partners $ 328,079 $ 113,550 $ (56,570)
=========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 912,595 $ 226,512 $ (866,776)
=========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 46.96 $ 11.65 $ (44.60)
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
General Limited
partners partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 395,245 $ 3,221,215 $ 3,616,460
Distributions (86,188) (249,067) (335,255)
Net loss (56,570) (866,776) (923,346)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 252,487 2,105,372 2,357,859
Distributions (99,150) (293,145) (392,295)
Net income 113,550 226,512 340,062
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 266,887 2,038,739 2,305,626
Distributions (301,462) (872,006) (1,173,468)
Net income 328,079 912,595 1,240,674
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 293,504 $ 2,079,328 $ 2,372,832
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 1,240,674 $ 340,062 $ (923,346)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 425,668
Depletion 109,721 175,467 730,438
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- (2,100)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (99,081) (122,140) 85,609
Accounts payable (913) 4,458 (8,232)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,250,401 397,847 308,037
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (14,534) (12,628) (10,572)
Proceeds from asset dispositions -- 211 2,100
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities (14,534) (12,417) (8,472)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (1,173,468) (392,295) (335,255)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 62,399 (6,865) (35,690)
Cash at beginning of year 117,140 124,005 159,695
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash at end of year $ 179,539 $ 117,140 $ 124,005
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1984 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
general partners are Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA") and P&P
Employees 84-A, Ltd. ("EMPL"). The Partnership's managing general partner is
Pioneer USA.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements
14
as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual Federal income
tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and gas
properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline
in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of its
oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on proved
reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $425,668 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
15
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $383,897 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 1,240,674 $ 340,062 $ (923,346)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 98,611 165,764 695,743
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes -- -- 425,668
Salvage income -- -- 2,967
Other, net (2,689) (4,938) 5,121
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 1,336,596 $ 500,888 $ 206,153
=========== =========== ===========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- ---------- ---------
Development costs $ 14,534 $ 12,628 $ 10,572
========= ========== =========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
------------ ------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 923,276 $ 923,276
Completed wells and equipment 17,337,500 17,322,966
------------ ------------
18,260,776 18,246,242
Accumulated depletion (16,391,831) (16,282,110)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,868,945 $ 1,964,132
============ ============
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- ---------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 410,572 $ 395,016 $ 382,325
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 70,448 $ 42,581 $ 33,724
Pioneer USA, EMPL and the Partnership are parties to the Partnership
agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership in which Pioneer USA owns 77.5% and the
remaining portion is owned by former s. In addition, Pioneer USA owned 419
limited partner interests in the Partnership at January 1, 2001.
The costs and revenues of the Partnership are allocated as follows:
General Limited
partners partners
-------- --------
Revenues:
Proceeds from property dispositions prior to cost
recovery 10% 90%
All other Partnership revenues 25% 75%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 10% 90%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 25% 75%
Incremental direct expenses - 100%
Incremental direct expenses are direct expenses which would not be
incurred except for the requirements of the securities regulatory authorities
and totaled $7,011, $10,900 and $4,661 in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 1,053,041 1,516,688
Revisions (400,628) (306,319)
Production (88,702) (145,870)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 563,711 1,064,499
Revisions 789,038 1,498,169
Production (85,868) (154,235)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 1,266,881 2,408,433
Revisions 168,380 (31,965)
Production (85,485) (138,617)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 1,349,776 2,237,851
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.02 per barrel of NGLs and $7.45 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $10,236,000 and undiscounted was
$20,832,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
18
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 45,297 $ 30,875 $ 6,111
Future production costs (24,465) (18,195) (4,514)
-------- -------- --------
20,832 12,680 1,597
10% annual discount factor (10,596) (6,020) (598)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 10,236 $ 6,660 $ 999
======== ======== ========
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (1,411) $ (560) $ (259)
Net changes in prices and production costs 3,988 2,450 (2,438)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 1,037 4,939 (555)
Accretion of discount 666 100 406
Changes in production rates, timing and other (704) (1,268) (211)
-------- -------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 3,576 5,661 (3,057)
-------- -------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 6,660 999 4,056
-------- -------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 10,236 $ 6,660 $ 999
======== ======== ========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 35% 33% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 17% 18% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 53%
NGTS LLC 10% 7% -
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 7% 29%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing,
L.P., TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and NGTS LLC were $43,117, $76,863 and $693,
respectively, which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and
gas sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
General partners - The general partners of the Partnership are Pioneer
USA and EMPL. Pioneer USA, the managing general partner, has the power
and authority to manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs.
As managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's
properties, all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and
billed to the Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas
revenues are received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of
the oil and gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to
being paid to the Partnership.
19
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$19,435,000. The general partners are required to contribute amounts
equal to 10% of Partnership expenditures for lease acquisition, drilling
and completion and 25% of direct, general and administrative and
operating expenses.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. Under the
Partnership agreement, Pioneer USA pays 8% of the Partnership's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 20% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated 20% of the
Partnership's revenues.
EMPL is a co-general partner of the Partnership. Under this arrangement, EMPL
pays 2% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 5%
of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, EMPL is
allocated 5% of the Partnership's revenues. EMPL does not receive any fees or
reimbursements from the Partnership.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
and EMPL respectively own 80% and 20% of the general partners' interests in the
Partnership. Pioneer USA owned 419 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
23
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $410,572 $395,016 $382,325
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 70,448 $ 42,581 $ 33,724
Under the limited partnership agreement, the general partners, Pioneer USA and
EMPL, together pay 10% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion
costs and 25% of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In
return, they are allocated 25% of the Partnership's revenues. Twenty percent of
the general partners' share of costs and revenues is allocated to EMPL and the
remainder is allocated to Pioneer USA. Certain former s of Pioneer USA are
limited partners of EMPL. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Partnership.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
Dated: March 23, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 23, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3.1 Agreement of limited partnership of Parker -
& Parsley 84-A, Ltd. incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4(e) of Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
2-90417), as amended on May 24, 1984, the
effective date thereof (hereinafter called, the
Partnership's Registration Statement)
3.2 Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited -
Partnership of Parker & Parsley 84-A, Ltd.
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the
Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period from July 6, 1984 (date of organization)
through December 31, 1984
4.1 Form of Subscription Agreement and Power of -
Attorney incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)
of the Partnership's Registration Statement
4.2 Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d)
of the Partnership's Registration Statement
PARKER & PARSLEY 84-A, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $1,110,822 $1,082,369 $2,348,261 $1,419,376 $1,124,134 $1,668,018 $1,984,346
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 425,668 $ 370,361 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $1,055,353
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 514,232 $ 531,630 $1,240,674 $ 340,062 $ (923,346) $ 70,124 $1,782,138
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
General partners $ 137,658 $ 142,146 $ 328,079 $ 113,550 $ (56,570) $ 121,907 $ 462,041
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 376,574 $ 389,484 $ 912,595 $ 226,512 $ (866,776) $ (51,783) $1,320,097
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 19.38 $ 20.04 $ 46.96 $ 11.65 $ (44.60) $ (2.66) $ 67.92
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 14.37 $ 19.45 $ 44.87 $ 15.08 $ 12.82 $ 32.32 $ 73.68(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $2,560,529 $2,389,514 $2,409,328 $2,343,035 $2,390,810 $3,657,643 $4,436,385
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $42.48
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
85-A, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 85-A, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 9,613
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 7,280
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,300
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 137.90
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.12 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b) (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 75.25
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 71.31
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 126.02
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 133.90
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 260
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its
partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent the estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to
sell the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2035, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 2-99079A
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-2064518
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000........................................ 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000....................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001....................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000....................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................... 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations....................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K............................ 11
Signatures.................................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 163,158 $ 72,868
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 72,982 103,810
---------- ----------
Total current assets 236,140 176,678
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 7,402,301 7,398,954
Accumulated depletion (6,889,539) (6,871,985)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 512,762 526,969
---------- ----------
$ 748,902 $ 703,647
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 18,211 $ 11,211
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 7,319 6,936
Limited partners (9,613 interests) 723,372 685,500
---------- ----------
730,691 692,436
---------- ----------
$ 748,902 $ 703,647
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 165,950 $ 174,901 $ 382,756 $ 353,329
Interest 1,199 1,518 2,517 2,548
-------- -------- -------- --------
167,149 176,419 385,273 355,877
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 99,647 76,933 184,949 168,879
General and administrative 4,979 5,247 11,483 10,600
Depletion 9,097 7,115 17,554 15,707
-------- -------- -------- --------
113,723 89,295 213,986 195,186
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 53,426 $ 87,124 $ 171,287 $ 160,691
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 534 $ 871 $ 1,713 $ 1,607
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 52,892 $ 86,253 $ 169,574 $ 159,084
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited partnership
interest $ 5.50 $ 8.97 $ 17.64 $ 16.55
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 6,936 $ 685,500 $ 692,436
Distributions (1,330) (131,702) (133,032)
Net income 1,713 169,574 171,287
-------- -------- --------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 7,319 $ 723,372 $ 730,691
======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 171,287 $ 160,691
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 17,554 15,707
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 30,828 (8,835)
Accounts payable 7,000 4,482
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 226,669 172,045
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (3,347) (3,092)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (133,032) (178,266)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 90,290 (9,313)
Cash at beginning of period 72,868 73,810
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 163,158 $ 64,497
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1985 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 8% to $382,756 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $353,329 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a decrease in production and lower average prices received
for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 8,134 barrels of oil, 3,588
7
barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 21,052 mcf of gas were sold, or
15,231 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 8,535 barrels of oil, 5,502 barrels of NGLs and 21,614 mcf of gas were
sold, or 17,639 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.07 from $27.78 for the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.71 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.89, or 22%, from $13.12
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.01 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 133% from $2.04 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.75 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility in the foreseeable future. The
Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at average
prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended June 30,
2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $213,986 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $195,186 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$18,800, or 10%. This increase was due to increases in production costs,
depletion and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $184,949 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$168,879 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $16,070, or 10%. The
increase was primarily due to an increase in workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
8% from $10,600 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $11,483 for the same
period in 2001 primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $17,554 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$15,707 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,847, or 12%. This
increase was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves for the period
ended June 30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 5% to $165,950 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001, as compared to $174,901 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
NGLs and a decline in production, offset by higher average prices received for
gas. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 4,100 barrels of oil, 1,570
barrels of NGLs and 8,687 mcf of gas were sold, or 7,118 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 4,084 barrels of oil, 2,518 barrels of NGLs and
9,802 mcf of gas were sold, or 8,236 BOEs.
8
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $1.03, or 4%, from $28.18
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.15 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $.40, or 3%, from $14.26
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $13.86 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 55% from $2.44 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.79 for the same period in 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $113,723 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $89,295 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$24,428, or 27%. This increase was due to an increase in production costs and
depletion, offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $99,647 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$76,933 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $22,714, or 30%. The
increase was primarily due to higher workover and well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 5% from $5,247 for the three months ended June
30, 2000 to $4,979 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a decline in
audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $9,097 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$7,115 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,982, or 28%. This increase
was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves for the period ended June
30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $54,624 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was primarily due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of
$29,396 and a reduction in working capital of $42,181, offset by increases in
production costs of $16,070 and G&A expenses of $883. The increase in oil and
gas receipts resulted from the increase in gas and NGL prices of $74,394 during
2001, offset by a decline of $44,449 in production and a $549 decline resulting
from lower oil prices during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to an increase in workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to
an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active
properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$133,032, of which $1,330 was distributed to the managing general partner and
9
$131,702 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $178,266, of which $1,783 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $176,483 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 6, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
------------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 2-99079A
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-2064518
------------------------------ -----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$9,426,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership interests
was 9,613.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1985 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 9,613 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers. Of the Partnership's total oil and
gas revenues for 2000, approximately 57% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial liability due to pollution and other
environmental damages. Although the Partnership believes that its business
operations do not impair environmental quality and that its costs of complying
with any
2
applicable environmental regulations are not currently significant, the
Partnership cannot predict what, if any, effect these environmental regulations
may have on its current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 25
productive oil and gas wells. At December 31, 2000, 21 wells were producing with
four wells sold during 1996.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 9,613 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 820 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $372,121 and
$161,988 respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1 997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Operating results:
------------
Oil and gas sales $ 757,929 $ 526,325 $ 371,098 $ 548,786 $ 631,838
========== ========== ========== =========== ============
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 22,031 $ 270,187 $ --
========== ========== ========== =========== ============
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 32,694
========== ========== ========== =========== ============
Net income (loss) $ 379,203 $ 178,927 $ (274,769) $ (158,804) $ 221,854
========== ========== ========== =========== ============
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 3,792 $ 1,789 $ (2,747) $ (1,588) $ 2,219
========== ========== ========== =========== ============
Limited partners $ 375,411 $ 177,138 $ (272,022) $ (157,216) $ 219,635
========== ========== ========== =========== ============
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 39.05 $ 18.43 $ (28.30) $ (16.35) $ 22.85
========== ========== ========== =========== ============
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 38.71 $ 16.85 $ 9.62 $ 25.26 $ 26.55 (a)
========== ========== ========== =========== ============
At year end:
------------
Identifiable assets $ 703,647 $ 702,600 $ 684,133 $ 1,059,494 $ 1,460,408
========== ========== ========== =========== ============
-----------------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $3.37 in
1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 44% to $757,929 for 2000 as
compared to $526,325 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production from 1999 to 2000. In
2000, 16,975 barrels of oil, 10,483 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and
41,549 mcf of gas were sold, or 34,383 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In
1999, 17,451 barrels of oil, 13,795 barrels of NGLs and 55,226 mcf of gas were
sold, or 40,450 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's
oil and gas properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in
production in the future until the Partnership's economically recoverable
reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.27, or 72%, from
$17.11 in 1999 to $29.38 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $4.49, or 46%, from $9.71 in 1999 to $14.20 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 56% from $1.70 in 1999 to $2.66 in 2000. The
market price received for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past
decade and management expects a certain amount of volatility in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $386,863 as compared to $350,830
in 1999, an increase of $36,033, or 10%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $331,978 in 2000 and $284,086 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $47,892, or 17%. The increase was primarily due to additional well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production and higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
44% from $15,790 in 1999 to $22,738 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $19,018 in 2000 and $9,794 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $32,147 in 2000 as compared to $50,954 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $18,807, or 37%. This decrease was primarily due to a 17,541 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
5
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 42% to $526,325 from
$371,098 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received and an increase in production from 1998 to 1999. In 1999, 17,451
barrels of oil, 13,795 barrels of NGLs and 55,226 mcf of gas were sold, or
40,450 BOEs. In 1998, 18,178 barrels of oil, 9,630 barrels of NGLs and 43,021
mcf of gas were sold, or 34,978 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.84, or 29%, from
$13.27 in 1998 to $17.11 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.20, or 49%, from $6.51 in 1998 to $9.71 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 9% from $1.56 in 1998 to $1.70 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $350,830 as compared to $649,476
in 1998, a decrease of $298,646, or 46%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in depletion, the impairment of oil and gas properties and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $284,086 in 1999 and $304,333 in 1998, resulting in a
decrease of $20,247, or 7%. The decrease was the combination of declines in well
maintenance costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production
taxes due to an increase in oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 42% from $11,133 in 1998 to $15,790 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $9,794 in
1999 and $8,231 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $22,031 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $50,954 in 1999 compared to $311,979 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $261,025, or 84%. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in
proved reserves of 182,664 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas
6
prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment and stable field
service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001, there is no
assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable level or
that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which could
negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $172,932 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $234,104, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $47,892, G&A expenses paid of $6,948 and working capital of $6,332. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $331,444 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $97,340 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to
expenditures for equipment upgrades on various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $2,454 and $279 were recognized in 2000 and
1999, respectively. Proceeds during 2000 of $2,205 were from salvage income
received on one fully depleted well and $249 from equipment credits received on
an active property. Proceeds during 1999 of $279 were from equipment credits
received on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $375,880, of which $3,759 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $372,121 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $163,624, of which
$1,636 was distributed to the managing general partner and $161,988 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 13
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of income, partners' capital and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 72,868 $ 73,810
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 103,810 72,517
----------- -----------
Total current assets 176,678 146,327
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 7,398,954 7,396,111
Accumulated depletion (6,871,985) (6,839,838)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 526,969 556,273
----------- -----------
$ 703,647 $ 702,600
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 11,211 $ 13,487
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 6,936 6,903
Limited partners (9,613 interests) 685,500 682,210
----------- -----------
692,436 689,113
$ 703,647 $ 702,600
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 757,929 $ 526,325 $ 371,098
Interest 5,932 3,432 3,609
Gain on disposition of assets 2,205 - -
------- ------- -------
766,066 529,757 374,707
------- ------- -------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 331,978 284,086 304,333
General and administrative 22,738 15,790 11,133
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 22,031
Depletion 32,147 50,954 311,979
------- ------- -------
386,863 350,830 649,476
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) $ 379,203 $ 178,927 $(274,769)
======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 3,792 $ 1,789 $ (2,747)
======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 375,411 $ 177,138 $(272,022)
======== ======== ========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 39.05 $ 18.43 $ (28.30)
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
-------------- -------------- -------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 10,430 $1,031,517 $1,041,947
Distributions (933) (92,435) (93,368)
Net loss (2,747) (272,022) (274,769)
------- -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 6,750 667,060 673,810
Distributions (1,636) (161,988) (163,624)
Net income 1,789 177,138 178,927
------- -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 6,903 682,210 689,113
Distributions (3,759) (372,121) (375,880)
Net income 3,792 375,411 379,203
------- -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 6,936 $ 685,500 $ 692,436
======== ========= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 379,203 $ 178,927 $(274,769)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 22,031
Depletion 32,147 50,954 311,979
Gain on disposition of assets (2,205) -- --
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (31,293) (30,401) 24,699
Accounts payable (2,276) 3,164 (7,224)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 375,576 202,644 76,716
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (3,092) (6,987) (12,611)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 2,454 279 323
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (638) (6,708) (12,288)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (375,880) (163,624) (93,368)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (942) 32,312 (28,940)
Cash at beginning of year 73,810 41,498 70,438
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 72,868 $ 73,810 $ 41,498
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1985 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
14
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated, in part, to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $22,031 related to its
proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
15
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $500,887 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 379,203 $ 178,927 $(274,769)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 26,488 45,239 307,564
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 22,031
Other, net (713) (817) 1,515
------- ------- -------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 404,978 $ 223,349 $ 56,341
======== ======== ========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ----------
Development costs $ 3,092 $ 6,987 $ 12,611
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 488,509 $ 488,509
Completed wells and equipment 6,910,445 6,907,602
----------- -----------
7,398,954 7,396,111
Accumulated depletion (6,871,985) (6,839,838)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 526,969 $ 556,273
=========== ===========
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 157,269 $ 148,638 $ 144,020
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 19,018 $ 9,794 $ 8,231
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. In addition,
Pioneer USA and the Partnership are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
---------------- -------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 187 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 318,665 423,423
Revisions (154,837) (135,041)
Production (27,808) (43,021)
----------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 136,020 245,361
Revisions 304,597 520,701
Production (31,246) (55,226)
----------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 409,371 710,836
Revisions 430 (151,364)
Production (27,458) (41,549)
----------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 382,343 517,923
=========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.51 per barrel of NGLs and $7.67 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $2,812,000 and undiscounted was $5,248,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
18
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 12,368 $ 10,131 $ 1,487
Future production costs (7,120) (6,033) (1,155)
-------- -------- --------
5,248 4,098 332
10% annual discount factor (2,436) (1,879) (102)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 2,812 $ 2,219 $ 230
======== ======== ========
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
(in, thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (426) $ (242) $ (67)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,007 705 (709)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (150) 2,101 (195)
Accretion of discount 222 22 114
Changes in production rates, timing and other (60) (597) (52)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 593 1,989 (909)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 2,219 230 1,139
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 2,812 $ 2,219 $ 230
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 57% 49% -
NGTS LLC 9% 10% 3%
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 60%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 7% 19%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $36,131, which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing
general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all
production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and
19
general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of
the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$9,613,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of
initial Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the partnership agreement
to the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts
21
Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981 from the
University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business Development
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief Financial
Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr. Dove joined
Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and was promoted
to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in which
position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley, Mr.
Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus Energy
Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 25% of its operating and general
and administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated approximately
25% of the Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 187 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
23
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- ---------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 157,269 $ 148,638 $144,020
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 19,018 $ 9,794 $ 8,231
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Partnership.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
Dated: March 27, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
--------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 27, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to
Item 14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
---------- ----------- ----
3(a) Amended and Restated Certificate of -
Limited Partnership of Parker & Parsley
85-A, Ltd. incorporated by reference to
Exhibit A of the Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
2-99079) (hereinafter called the Partnership's
Registration Statement)
4(b) Agreement of Limited Partnership of -
Parker & Parsley 85-A, Ltd. incorporated
by reference to an Exhibit of the Partnership's
Registration Statement
4(c) Form of Subscription Agreement and Power -
of Attorney incorporated by reference to
an Exhibit of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4(d) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to an
Exhibit of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-A, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 382,756 $ 353,329 $ 757,929 $ 526,325 $ 371,098 $ 548,786 $ 631,838
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 22,031 $ 270,187 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 32,694
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 171,287 $ 160,691 $ 379,203 $ 178,927 $ (274,769) $ (158,804) $ 221,854
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,713 $ 1,607 $ 3,792 $ 1,789 $ (2,747) $ (1,588) $ 2,219
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 169,574 $ 159,084 $ 375,411 $ 177,138 $ (272,022) $ (157,216) $ 219,635
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 17.64 $ 16.55 $ 39.05 $ 18.43 $ (28.30) $ (16.35) $ 22.85
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 13.70 $ 18.36 $ 38.71 $ 16.85 $ 9.62 $ 25.26 $ 26.55(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 748,902 $ 689,507 $ 703,647 $ 702,600 $ 684,133 $1,059,494 $1,460,408
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $3.37
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
85-B, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 85-B, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 7,988
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 7,627
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,155
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 145.71
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.08 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 120.38
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 117.13
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 134.55
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 141.50
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 210
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2035, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 2 -99079B
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-2075492
------------------------------------------ ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- -----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and 2000........................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 154,190 $ 80,718
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 73,028 84,740
---------- ----------
Total current assets 227,218 165,458
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,318,689 5,317,256
Accumulated depletion (4,558,726) (4,526,767)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 759,963 790,489
---------- ----------
$ 987,181 $ 955,947
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 15,556 $ 10,515
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 10,067 9,805
Limited partners (7,988 interests) 961,558 935,627
---------- ----------
971,625 945,432
---------- ----------
$ 987,181 $ 955,947
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- -----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 144,439 $ 140,791 $ 323,533 $ 276,113
Interest 1,125 1,335 2,407 2,322
-------- -------- -------- ---------
145,564 142,126 325,940 278,435
-------- -------- -------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 71,567 79,043 132,743 136,410
General and administrative 4,333 4,223 9,706 8,283
Depletion 17,339 14,055 31,959 27,918
-------- -------- -------- ---------
93,239 97,321 174,408 172,611
-------- -------- -------- ---------
Net income $ 52,325 $ 44,805 $ 151,532 $ 105,824
======== ======== ======== =========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 523 $ 448 $ 1,515 $ 1,058
======== ======== ======== =========
Limited partners $ 51,802 $ 44,357 $ 150,017 $ 104,766
======== ======== ======== =========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 6.48 $ 5.56 $ 18.78 $ 13.12
======== ======== ======== =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 9,805 $ 935,627 $ 945,432
Distributions (1,253) (124,086) (125,339)
Net income 1,515 150,017 151,532
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 10,067 $ 961,558 $ 971,625
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 151,532 $ 105,824
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 31,959 27,918
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 11,712 (9,996)
Accounts payable 5,041 5,318
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 200,244 129,064
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,433) (2,708)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 6,412
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (1,433) 3,704
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (125,339) (137,064)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 73,472 (4,296)
Cash at beginning of period 80,718 74,959
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 154,190 $ 70,663
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1985 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results of operations are not
necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may
have been made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June
30, 2001 financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 17% to $323,533 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $276,113 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a slight decline in production and lower average prices
7
received for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 6,896 barrels of oil,
2,960 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 16,032 mcf of gas were sold,
or 12,528 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 6,942 barrels of oil, 3,123 barrels of NGLs and 14,832 mcf of gas were
sold, or 12,537 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.63, or 2%, from $28.58
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.95 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.56, or 18%, from
$14.29 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.85 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 126% from $2.23
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.05 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $174,408 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $172,611 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,797,
or 1%. This increase was due to increases in depletion and general and
administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decrease in production costs.
Production costs were $132,743 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$136,410 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $3,667, or 3%. The decrease
was primarily due to lower well maintenance costs, offset by an increase in
workover expense incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
17% from $8,283 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $9,706 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees and a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $31,959 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$27,918 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $4,041, or 14%. This
increase was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves due to lower
commodity prices during the period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 3% to $144,439 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $140,791 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a decrease in production and lower average prices received
for oil. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 3,236 barrels of oil, 1,626
barrels of NGLs and 7,667 mcf of gas were sold, or 6,140 BOEs. For the three
8
months ended June 30, 2000, 3,454 barrels of oil, 1,618 barrels of NGLs and
7,403 mcf of gas were sold, or 6,306 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $1.58, or 6%, from $28.52
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.94 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.95, or 7%, from $14.18
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.13 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 63% from $2.61 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.26 for the same period in 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $93,239 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $97,321 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$4,082, or 4%. This decrease was due to a decrease in production costs, offset
by increases in depletion and G&A.
Production costs were $71,567 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$79,043 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $7,476, or 9%. The decrease
was primarily due to lower well maintenance costs, offset by an increase in
workover expenses incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A increased 3% from $4,223 for the three months ended June
30, 2000 to $4,333 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $17,339 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$14,055 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $3,284, or 23%. This
increase was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves due to lower
commodity prices during the period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $71,180 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase of $47,505 in oil and gas sales receipts and
reductions in working capital of $21,431 and production costs of $3,667, offset
by an increase in G&A expenses of $1,423. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in gas and NGL prices of $49,771 and $6,054 resulting
from an increase in gas production during 2001, offset by $4,032 resulting from
the decline in oil and NGL production and a $4,288 decline resulting from lower
oil prices during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The decrease in
production costs was due to lower well maintenance costs, offset by an increase
in workover expenses incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A
was primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees and a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
9
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active
properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $6,412 were received during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits received on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$125,339, of which $1,253 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$124,086 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $137,064, of which $1,371 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $135,693 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
10
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 7, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
------------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 2-99079B
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-2075492
------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$7,930,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 7,988.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1985 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 7,988 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers. Of the Partnership's total oil and
gas revenues for 2000, approximately 48%, 20% and 10% were attributable to sales
made to Mobil Oil Corporation, Plains Marketing, L.P. and NGTS LLC,
respectively. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser
would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil, natural gas
liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations. The oil and gas business is
also subject to environmental hazards such as oil spills, gas leaks and ruptures
and discharges of toxic substances or gases that could expose the Partnership to
substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 22
productive oil and gas wells. One well was converted to a saltwater disposal
well during 1987 and four wells have been plugged and abandoned. At December 31,
2000, the Partnership had 17 producing wells.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 7,988 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 717 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $309,279 and
$115,631, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
--------- -------- --------- -------- ---------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 619,365 $ 387,551 $ 341,048 $ 538,813 $ 616,863
========= ======== ========= ======== =========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ 10,050 $ 95,253 $ 52,922 $ 324,374 $ -
========= ======== ========= ======== =========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 62,948
========= ======== ========= ======== =========
Net income (loss) $ 277,323 $ (14,097) $ (117,257) $(177,091) $ 286,574
========= ======== ========= ======== =========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 2,773 $ (141) $ (1,172) $ (1,771) $ 2,866
========= ======== ========= ======== =========
Limited partners $ 274,550 $ (13,956) $ (116,085) $(175,320) $ 283,708
========= ======== ========= ======== =========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 34.37 $ (1.75) $ (14.53) $ (21.95) $ 35.52
========= ======== ======== ======== =========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 38.72 $ 14.48 $ 17.29 $ 33.72 $ 42.90 (a)
========= ========= ======== ======== =========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $ 955,947 $ 992,521 $1,122,069 $1,386,758 $1,831,497
========= ======== ========= ========= =========
--------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of
$7.80 in 1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 60% to $619,365 for 2000 as
compared to $387,551 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 14,002
barrels of oil, 6,807 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 30,909 mcf of
gas were sold, or 25,961 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 14,280
barrels of oil, 7,130 barrels of NGLs and 33,467 mcf of gas were sold, or 26,988
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $11.95, or 66%, from
$18.07 in 1999 to $30.02 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.86, or 58%, from $10.10 in 1999 to $15.96 in 2000. The average
price received per mcf of gas increased 70% from $1.72 in 1999 to $2.92 in 2000.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility in the foreseeable future.
The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at average
prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 2000 to $347,682 as compared to $404,907
in 1999, a decrease of $57,225, or 14%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties and depletion, offset by
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $264,543 in 2000 and $207,744 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $56,799, or 27%. The increase was primarily due to additional well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production and higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
60% from $11,626 in 1999 to $18,581 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $15,555 in 2000 and $6,624 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized
non-cash charges of $10,050 and $95,253 related to its oil and gas properties
during 2000 and 1999, respectively.
5
Depletion was $54,508 in 2000 as compared to $90,284 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $35,776, or 40%. This decrease was primarily due to a 17,204 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges
taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 14% to $387,551 from
$341,048 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 14,280 barrels of oil,
7,130 barrels of NGLs and 33,467 mcf of gas were sold, or 26,988 BOEs. In 1998,
16,204 barrels of oil, 8,599 barrels of NGLs and 41,501 mcf of gas were sold, or
31,720 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $4.77, or 36%, from
$13.30 in 1998 to $18.07 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.15, or 45%, from $6.95 in 1998 to $10.10 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 9% from $1.58 in 1998 to $1.72 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $404,907 as compared to $462,704
in 1998, a decrease of $57,797, or 12%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in production costs and depletion, offset by increases in the
impairment of oil and gas properties and G&A.
Production costs were $207,744 in 1999 and $269,093 in 1998, resulting in a
$61,349 decrease, or 23%. The decrease was attributable to less well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased, in aggregate, 14% from $10,231 in 1998 to
$11,626 in 1999 primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing
general partner $6,624 in 1999 and $7,884 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of
the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized non-cash SFAS 121 charges of $95,253 and $52,922
related to its oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Depletion was $90,284 in 1999 compared to $130,458 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $40,174, or 31%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 117,564 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and
a decline in oil production of 1,924 barrels for the period ended December 31,
1999 compared to the same period in 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but
6
to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During 1999 and
2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and certain
other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned export
volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the announced
reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil prices, as have
overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North American natural gas
prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment and stable field
service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001, there is no
assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable level or
that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which could
negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $163,858 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $234,195, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $56,799, G&A expenses paid of $6,955 and working capital of $6,583. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $255,175 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by a decrease of $20,980 resulting from the decline in production during
2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to
higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited
to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were for
expenditures related to oil and gas equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $6,412 and $134 during 2000 and 1999,
respectively, were from equipment credits received on active wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $312,403, of which $3,124 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $309,279 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $116,799, of which
$1,168 was distributed to the managing general partner and $115,631 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 13
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 80,718 $ 74,959
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 84,740 59,750
----------- -----------
Total current assets 165,458 134,709
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,317,256 5,320,021
Accumulated depletion (4,526,767) (4,462,209)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 790,489 857,812
----------- -----------
$ 955,947 $ 992,521
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 10,515 $ 12,009
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 9,805 10,156
Limited partners (7,988 interests) 935,627 970,356
----------- -----------
945,432 980,512
----------- -----------
$ 955,947 $ 992,521
=========== ===========
10
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 619,365 $ 387,551 $ 341,048
Interest 5,640 3,259 4,399
--------- --------- ---------
625,005 390,810 345,447
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 264,543 207,744 269,093
General and administrative 18,581 11,626 10,231
Impairment of oil and gas properties 10,050 95,253 52,922
Depletion 54,508 90,284 130,458
--------- --------- ---------
347,682 404,907 462,704
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 277,323 $ (14,097) $(117,257)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 2,773 $ (141) $ (1,172)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 274,550 $ (13,956) $(116,085)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership
interest $ 34.37 $ (1.75) $ (14.53)
========= ========= =========
11
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
-------------- -------------- --------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 14,031 $1,354,156 $1,368,187
Distributions (1,394) (138,128) (139,522)
Net loss (1,172) (116,085) (117,257)
------- -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 11,465 1,099,943 1,111,408
Distributions (1,168) (115,631) (116,799)
Net loss (141) (13,956) (14,097)
------- -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 10,156 970,356 980,512
Distributions (3,124) (309,279) (312,403)
Net income 2,773 274,550 277,323
------- -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 9,805 $ 935,627 $ 945,432
======== ========= ========
12
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 277,323 $ (14,097) $(117,257)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 10,050 95,253 52,922
Depletion 54,508 90,284 130,458
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (24,990) (21,249) 46,814
Accounts payable (1,494) 1,348 (7,910)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 315,397 151,539 105,027
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas equipment (3,647) (7,285) (7,947)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 6,412 134 --
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 2,765 (7,151) (7,947)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (312,403) (116,799) (139,522)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 5,759 27,589 (42,442)
Cash at beginning of year 74,959 47,370 89,812
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 80,718 $ 74,959 $ 47,370
========= ========= =========
13
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1985 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $10,050, $95,253 and
$52,922 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
15
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $89,078 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 277,323 $ (14,097) $(117,257)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 50,022 86,267 127,807
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 10,050 95,253 52,922
Other, net 5,557 (1,887) 2,207
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 342,952 $ 165,536 $ 65,679
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
Development costs $ 3,647 $ 7,285 $ 7,947
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 292,864 $ 292,864
Completed wells and equipment 5,024,392 5,027,157
----------- -----------
5,317,256 5,320,021
Accumulated depletion (4,526,767) (4,462,209)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 790,489 $ 857,812
=========== ===========
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $105,647 $ 97,004 $111,206
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 15,555 $ 6,624 $ 7,884
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. In addition,
Pioneer USA and the Partnership are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer
USA (1) Partnership
------------- -------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 58 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------- ------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 333,208 531,982
Revisions (139,875) (179,491)
Production (24,803) (41,501)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 168,530 310,990
Revisions 177,510 247,011
Production (21,410) (33,467)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 324,630 524,534
Revisions 634 (33,966)
Production (20,809) (30,909)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 304,455 459,659
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.43 per barrel of NGLs and $7.87 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $2,332,000 and undiscounted was $4,536,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
18
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- --------- ----------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 10,394 $ 8,008 $ 1,850
Future production costs (5,858) (4,882) (1,499)
-------- -------- --------
4,536 3,126 351
10% annual discount factor (2,204) (1,410) (95)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 2,332 $ 1,716 $ 256
======== ======== ========
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (355) $ (180) $ (72)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,003 954 (923)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (33) 1,209 (154)
Accretion of discount 172 25 133
Changes in production rates, timing and other (171) (548) (54)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 616 1,460 (1,070)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 1,716 256 1,326
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 2,332 $ 1,716 $ 256
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Mobil Oil Corporation 48% 51% 45%
Plains Marketing, L.P. 20% 16% -
NGTS LLC 10% 7% 1%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 6% 29%
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 18%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Mobil Oil Corporation,
Plains Marketing, L.P. and NGTS LLC were $23,621, $7,883 and $1,228,
respectively, which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and
gas sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing
general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all
production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
19
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share
of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$7,988,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of
initial Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to
the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays 10% of the Program's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 25% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated 25% of the Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 58 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
23
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 105,647 $ 97,004 $111,206
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 15,555 $ 6,624 $ 7,884
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes
thereto, or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
Dated: March 27, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 27, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Amended and Restated Certificate of -
Limited Partnership of Parker & Parsley
85-B, Ltd. incorporated by reference to
Exhibit A of the Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
2-99079) (hereinafter called the Partnership's
Registration Statement)
4(a) Agreement of Limited Partnership of -
Parker & Parsley 85-B, Ltd. incorporated by
reference to an Exhibit of the Partnership's
Registration Statement
4(b) Form of Subscription Agreement and Power -
of Attorney incorporated by reference to an
Exhibit of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to an Exhibit
of the Partnership's Registration Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 85-B, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 323,533 $ 276,113 $ 619,365 $ 387,551 $ 341,048 $ 538,813 $ 616,863
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 10,050 $ 95,253 $ 52,922 $ 324,374 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 62,948
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 151,532 $ 105,824 $ 277,323 $ (14,097) $ (117,257) $ (177,091) $ 286,574
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,515 $ 1,058 $ 2,773 $ (141) $ (1,172) $ (1,771) $ 2,866
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 150,017 $ 104,766 $ 274,550 $ (13,956) $ (116,085) $ (175,320) $ 283,708
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 18.78 $ 13.12 $ 34.37 $ (1.75) $ (14.53) $ (21.95) $ 35.52
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 15.53 $ 16.99 $ 38.72 $ 14.48 $ 17.29 $ 33.72 $ 42.90(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 987,181 $ 966,599 $ 955,947 $ 992,521 $1,122,069 $1,386,758 $1,831,497
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $7.80
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus
dated October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 5,000
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 5,658
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,370
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 280.77
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 4.01 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 155.76
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 148.95
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 267.46
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 272.44
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 275
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2035, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 157,592 $ 74,084
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 42,165 68,251
---------- ----------
Total current assets 199,757 142,335
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 3,399,009 3,399,009
Accumulated depletion (2,797,219) (2,780,814)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 601,790 618,195
---------- ----------
$ 801,547 $ 760,530
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 12,433 $ 5,818
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 10,301 9,957
Limited partners (125 interests) 778,813 744,755
---------- ----------
789,114 754,712
---------- ----------
$ 801,547 $ 760,530
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 101,279 $ 118,958 $ 224,605 $ 237,006
Interest 1,097 1,577 2,232 2,653
Gain on disposition of assets - 9,798 - 33,459
-------- -------- -------- --------
102,376 130,333 226,837 273,118
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 38,172 44,521 76,985 83,393
General and administrative 2,025 2,379 4,492 4,740
Depletion 8,596 9,101 16,405 19,958
Abandoned property - 184 - 7,039
-------- -------- -------- --------
48,793 56,185 97,882 115,130
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 53,583 $ 74,148 $ 128,955 $ 157,988
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 536 $ 742 $ 1,290 $ 1,580
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 53,047 $ 73,406 $ 127,665 $ 156,408
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 424.38 $ 587.24 $1,021.32 $1,251.26
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 9,957 $ 744,755 $ 754,712
Distributions (946) (93,607) (94,553)
Net income 1,290 127,665 128,955
-------- -------- --------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 10,301 $ 778,813 $ 789,114
======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 128,955 $ 157,988
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 16,405 19,958
Gain on disposition of assets - (33,459)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 26,086 (11,974)
Accounts payable 6,615 4,610
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 178,061 137,123
-------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties - (1,947)
Proceeds from disposition of assets - 42,294
-------- --------
Net cash provided by investing activities - 40,347
-------- --------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (94,553) (181,526)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 83,508 (4,056)
Cash at beginning of period 74,084 79,497
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 157,592 $ 75,441
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited
partnership organized in 1985 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 5% to $224,605 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $237,006 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and lower
6
average prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
NGLs and gas. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 5,787 barrels of oil,
1,864 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 7,461 mcf of gas were sold, or
8,895 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 6,332 barrels of oil, 2,722 barrels of NGLs and 10,079 mcf of gas were
sold, or 10,734 BOEs.
The average price per barrel of oil decreased $.44, or 2%, from $28.37 for the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.93 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.58, or 11%, from $13.98
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.56 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 137% from $1.92 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.55 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $33,459 was recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits on one well plugged and abandoned in
the current period. Expenses incurred to plug and abandon this well were $7,039
for the six months ended June 30, 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $97,882 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $115,130 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $17,248,
or 15%. This decrease was due to declines in abandoned property costs,
production costs, depletion and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $76,985 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and $83,393
for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $6,408, or 8%, decrease. The
decrease was primarily the result of less workover costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
5%, from $4,740 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4,492 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a lower allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of decreased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $16,405 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$19,958 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $3,553, or 18%. This decrease
was the result of a decline in oil production of 545 barrels for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 15% to $101,279 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $118,958 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and declines in
average prices received for oil and NGLs, offset by higher average prices
received for gas. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 2,952 barrels of
oil, 852 barrels of NGLs and 2,954 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,296 BOEs. For the
three months ended June 30, 2000, 2,940 barrels of oil, 1,426 barrels of NGLs
and 5,021 mcf of gas were sold, or 5,203 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $2.37, or 8%, from $29.53
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.16 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $1.05, or
7%, from $14.59 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $13.54 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 43% to
$3.23 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.26 during the same
period in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $9,798 was recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits on one well plugged and abandoned in
the current period. Expenses incurred to plug and abandon this well were $184
for the three months ended June 30, 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $48,793 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $56,185 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$7,392, or 13%. This decrease was due to declines in production cost, depletion,
G&A and abandoned property costs.
Production costs were $38,172 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$44,521 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $6,349 decrease, or 14%. The
decrease was due to lower workover costs.
During this period, G&A decreased 15%, from $2,379 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $2,025 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues and a
decline in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $8,596 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$9,101 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $505, or 6%.
8
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $40,938 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to a reduction in working capital of $40,065 and declines in
production costs of $6,408, G&A expenses of $248 and abandoned property costs of
$7,039, offset by a decline in oil and gas receipts of $12,822. The decline in
oil and gas receipts resulted from a decline in production of $40,493 during
2001 as compared to the same period in 2000 and $2,784 due to lower average
prices received for oil, offset by an increase in gas and NGL prices during 2001
which contributed an additional $30,455 to oil and gas receipts. The decrease in
production costs was primarily due to lower workover costs. The decrease in G&A
was primarily due to a lower percentage of the managing general partner's G&A
being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased
oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2000 were related to expenditures for equipment upgrades on various oil
and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $42,294 were received during the six
months ended June 30, 2000. The proceeds were primarily from equipment credits
on one well plugged and abandoned during 2000.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$94,553, of which $946 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$93,607 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $181,526, of which $1,815 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $179,711 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
9
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A,
Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations,
partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 85-A, Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 74,084 $ 79,497
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 68,251 45,956
------------ -------------
Total current assets 142,335 125,453
------------ -------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 3,399,009 4,113,242
Accumulated depletion (2,780,814) (3,391,494)
------------ -------------
Net oil and gas properties 618,195 721,748
------------ -------------
$ 760,530 $ 847,201
============= ==============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 5,818 $ 8,160
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 9,957 10,800
Limited partners (125 interests) 744,755 828,241
------------ -------------
754,712 839,041
------------ -------------
$ 760,530 $ 847,201
============= ==============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 502,432 $ 342,760 $ 269,068
Interest 6,051 3,587 3,856
Gain on disposition of assets 33,459 -- --
--------- --------- ----------
541,942 346,347 272,924
--------- --------- ----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 164,183 157,138 173,592
General and administrative 10,049 6,855 6,018
Impairment of oil and gas properties 61,942 -- 130,873
Depletion 35,049 65,329 131,389
Abandoned property 7,038 -- --
--------- --------- ----------
278,261 229,322 441,872
--------- --------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 263,681 $ 117,025 $ (168,948)
========= ========= ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 2,637 $ 1,170 $ (1,689)
========= ========= ==========
Limited partners $ 261,044 $ 115,855 $ (167,259)
========= ========= ==========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $2,088.35 $ 926.84 $(1,338.07)
========= ========= ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
------------- -------------- ---------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 13,952 $ 1,140,211 $ 1,154,163
Distributions (1,142) (112,983) (114,125)
Net loss (1,689) (167,259) (168,948)
----------- ------------ ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 11,121 859,969 871,090
Distributions (1,491) (147,583) (149,074)
Net income 1,170 115,855 117,025
----------- ------------ ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 10,800 828,241 839,041
Distributions (3,480) (344,530) (348,010)
Net income 2,637 261,044 263,681
----------- ------------ ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 9,957 $ 744,755 $ 754,712
============ ============= =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 263,681 $ 117,025 $ (168,948)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 61,942 - 130,873
Depletion 35,049 65,329 131,389
Gain on disposition of assets (33,459) - -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (22,295) (7,696) 9,222
Accounts payable (2,342) 1,422 2,238
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 302,576 176,080 104,774
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,948) (6,572) (1,756)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 41,969 - -
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided (used by) investing
activities 40,021 (6,572) (1,756)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (348,010) (149,074) (114,125)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (5,413) 20,434 (11,107)
Cash at beginning of year 79,497 59,063 70,170
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash at end of year $ 74,084 $ 79,497 $ 59,063
============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 85-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1985 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as determined evaluated by independent petroleum
consultants. The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of
and the related allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and
any gain or loss is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $61,942 and $130,873
related to its
8
proved oil and gas properties during 2000 and 1998, respectively.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $5,983 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements
of operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 263,681 $ 117,025 $ (168,948)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 32,046 62,742 129,509
Impairment of oil and gas properties for
financial reporting purposes 61,942 - 130,873
Other, net (7,404) 1,067 (933)
------------ ----------- ------------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 350,265 $ 180,834 $ 90,501
============= ============ =============
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Development costs $ 1,948 $ 6,572 $ 1,756
============ ============ ===========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 102,103 $ 102,995
Completed wells and equipment 3,296,906 4,010,247
------------ ------------
3,399,009 4,113,242
Accumulated depletion (2,780,814) (3,391,494)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 618,195 $ 721,748
============= =============
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 66,336 $ 73,804 $ 78,418
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 8,067 $ 3,581 $ 4,294
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA
and the Partnership are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
------------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
-------------------- -------------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 271,658 288,529
Revisions (91,942) (76,028)
Production (21,200) (22,343)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 158,516 190,158
Revisions 180,472 261,855
Production (20,664) (23,218)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 318,324 428,795
Revisions 27,943 (50,880)
Production (17,619) (20,905)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 328,648 357,010
============ ============
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.00 per barrel of NGLs and $7.43 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $2,408,000 and undiscounted was $5,247,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 10,071 $ 7,881 $ 1,713
Future production costs (4,824) (4,213) (1,293)
------------- ------------ -------------
5,247 3,668 420
10% annual discount factor (2,839) (1,850) (139)
------------- ------------ -------------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 2,408 $ 1,818 $ 281
============== ============= ==============
11
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (338) $ (186) $ (95)
Net changes in prices and production costs 820 905 (674)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 130 1,414 (124)
Accretion of discount 182 28 109
Changes in production rates, timing and other (204) (624) (21)
------------- ------------ ------------
Change in present value of future net revenues 590 1,537 (805)
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, beginning of year 1,818 281 1,086
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, end of year $ 2,408 $ 1,818 $ 281
============== ============= =============
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 64% 60% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 63%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 6% 25%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $27,002 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing
general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all
production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion
12
of the oil and gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to
being paid to the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement,
the managing general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the
Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$5,000,000. Pioneer USA was required to contribute amounts equal to 1%
of initial Partnership capital less commission and organization and
offering costs allocated to the limited partners and to contribute
amounts necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the
Partnership agreement to the extent its share of revenues does not cover
such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
(A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 47% to $502,432 for 2000 as
compared to $342,760 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 11,945
barrels of oil, 5,674 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 20,905 mcf of
gas were sold, or 21,103 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 14,568
barrels of oil, 6,096 barrels of NGLs and 23,218 mcf of gas were sold, or 24,534
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $13.28, or 79%, from
$16.91 in 1999 to $30.19 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.27, or 53%, from $9.95 in 1999 to $15.22 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 72% from $1.54 in 1999 to $2.65 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets recognized during 2000 of $33,459 was due to
equipment credits received on two wells plugged and abandoned during the current
year. Abandoned property costs of $7,038 incurred in 2000 related to the
abandonment of these two wells.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $278,261 as compared to $229,322
in 1999, an increase of $48,939, or 21%. The increase was primarily due to the
impairment of oil and gas properties and increases in production costs,
abandoned property costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset
by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $164,183 in 2000 and $157,138 in 1999, resulting in a
$7,045 increase, or 4%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production, offset by a decline in well maintenance costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
47% from $6,855 in 1999 to $10,049 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 2% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $8,067 in 2000 and $3,581 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $61,942 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $35,049 in 2000 as compared to $65,329 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $30,280, or 46%. This decrease was primarily due to a 20,767 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices and a decline in oil production of 2,623 barrels for the period ended
December 31, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 27% to $342,760 from
$269,068 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 14,568 barrels of oil,
6,096 barrels of NGLs and 23,218 mcf of gas were sold, or 24,534 BOEs. In 1998,
14,874 barrels of oil, 6,326 barrels of NGLs and 22,343 mcf of gas were sold, or
24,924 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.71, or 28%, from
$13.20 in 1998 to $16.91 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.46, or 53%, from $6.49 in 1998 to $9.95 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 9% from $1.41 in 1998 to $1.54 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $229,322 as compared to $441,872
in 1998, a decrease of $212,550, or 48%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $157,138 in 1999 and $173,592 in 1998, resulting in a
$16,454 decrease, or 9%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 14% from $6,018 in 1998 to $6,855 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 2% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $3,581 in
1999 and $4,294 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $130,873 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $65,329 in 1999 compared to $131,389 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $66,060, or 50%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 120,513 barrels of oil during 1999 due to higher commodity
prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges
taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $126,496 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $162,136, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $7,045, G&A expenses paid of $3,194, abandoned property costs paid of $7,038
and working capital of $18,363. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted
from the increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an
additional $253,878 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $91,742 resulting from
the decline in production during 2000. The increase in production costs was
primarily due to increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas
prices and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production, offset by a
decline in well maintenance costs. The increase in G&A was primarily due to
higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited
to 2% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on several oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets during 2000 of $41,969 were related to
$33,459 salvage income received on two wells plugged and abandoned during the
current year and $8,510 from equipment credits received on one active well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $348,010, of which $3,480 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $344,530 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $149,074, of which
$1,491 was distributed to the managing general partner and $147,583 to the
limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 85-A, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 224,605 $ 237,006 $ 502,432 $ 342,760 $ 269,068 $ 396,312 $ 474,256
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 61,942 $ -- $ 130,873 $ 154,523 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 128,955 $ 157,988 $ 263,681 $ 117,025 $ (168,948) $ (35,440) $ 214,177
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,290 $ 1,580 $ 2,637 $ 1,170 $ (1,689) $ (354) $ 2,142
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 127,665 $ 156,408 $ 261,044 $ 115,855 $ (167,259) $ (35,086) $ 212,035
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 1,021.32 $ 1,251.26 $ 2,088.35 $ 926.84 $(1,338.07) $ (280.69) $ 1,696.28
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 746.86 $ 1,437.69 $ 2,756.24 $ 1,180.66 $ 903.86 $ 1,914.33 $ 2,012.00
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 801,547 $ 828,273 $ 760,530 $ 847,201 $ 877,828 $1,158,663 $1,438,725
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.,
A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. and supplements the proxy
statement/prospectus dated October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources
Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is
soliciting proxies to be voted at a special meeting of limited partners of the
partnership. The purpose of the special meeting is for you to vote upon the
merger of the partnership with and into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will
result in your receiving common stock of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for
your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley Private Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 4,690
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 4,536
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,025
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 222.43
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.56 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 120.03
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 110.65
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 209.97
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 215.74
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 215
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2035, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 116,008 $ 32,773
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 59,116 78,218
---------- ----------
Total current assets 175,124 110,991
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 3,864,140 3,864,140
Accumulated depletion (3,456,228) (3,441,568)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 407,912 422,572
---------- ----------
$ 583,036 $ 533,563
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 11,773 $ 6,722
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 8,336 7,892
Limited partners (117 interests) 562,927 518,949
---------- ----------
571,263 526,841
---------- ----------
$ 583,036 $ 533,563
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 120,409 $ 106,941 $ 249,386 $ 196,468
Interest 768 881 1,548 1,473
Gain on disposition of assets - - 2,574 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
121,177 107,822 253,508 197,941
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 50,842 42,099 101,173 82,419
General and administrative 2,409 2,138 4,988 3,929
Depletion 7,874 8,685 14,660 16,778
-------- -------- -------- --------
61,125 52,922 120,821 103,126
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 60,052 $ 54,900 $ 132,687 $ 94,815
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 601 $ 549 $ 1,327 $ 948
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 59,451 $ 54,351 $ 131,360 $ 93,867
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 508.13 $ 464.54 $1,122.74 $ 802.28
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 7,892 $ 518,949 $ 526,841
Distributions (883) (87,382) (88,265)
Net income 1,327 131,360 132,687
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 8,336 $ 562,927 $ 571,263
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 132,687 $ 94,815
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 14,660 16,778
Gain on disposition of assets (2,574) -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 19,102 (11,456)
Accounts payable 5,051 3,106
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 168,926 103,243
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties - (885)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 2,574 -
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 2,574 (885)
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (88,265) (98,809)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 83,235 3,549
Cash at beginning of period 32,773 39,610
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 116,008 $ 43,159
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1985 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 27% to $249,386 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $196,468 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received and an
increase in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 5,370 barrels of
6
oil, 2,580 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 12,602 mcf of gas were
sold, or 10,050 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 4,791 barrels of oil, 2,883 barrels of NGLs and 11,058 mcf of gas
were sold, or 9,517 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.31, or 1%, from $27.61
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.92 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.11, or 15%, from
$14.13 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.24 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 116% from $2.12
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.57 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility in the foreseeable future.
The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at average
prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended June 30,
2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $120,821 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $103,126 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $17,695
or 17%. This increase was due to higher production costs and general and
administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $101,173 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$82,419 for the same period in 2000 resulting in an $18,754 increase, or 23%.
This increase was the result of additional well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production and higher production taxes due to higher oil and gas
prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
27%, from $3,929 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4,988 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and increases in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $14,660 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$16,778 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $2,118, or 13%. This decrease
was the result of a positive revision to proved reserves on significant wells
during the period ended June 30, 2001, offset by an increase in oil production
of 579 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 13% to $120,409 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $106,941 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
7
and an increase in production, offset by lower average prices received for oil
and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 2,829 barrels of oil, 1,389
barrels of NGLs and 6,018 mcf of gas were sold, or 5,221 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 2,521 barrels of oil, 1,528 barrels of NGLs and
5,665 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,993 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.31, or 1%, from $27.86
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.55 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $.12, or
1%, from $14.69 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.57 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 46% to
$3.69 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.52 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $61,125 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $52,922 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$8,203, or 16%. This increase was due to higher production costs and G&A, offset
by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $50,842 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$42,099 for the same period in 2000 resulting in an $8,743, or 21%, increase.
The increase was due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate
well production and higher production taxes due to higher oil and gas prices.
During this period, G&A increased 13%, from $2,138 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $2,409 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a higher
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $7,874 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$8,685 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $811, or 9%. This decrease was
the result of a positive revision to proved reserves on significant wells during
the period ended June 30, 2001, offset by an increase in oil production of 308
barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period
in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $65,683 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $52,993 and a
reduction in working capital of $32,503, offset by increases in production costs
of $18,754 and G&A expenses of $1,059. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $34,695 to oil and gas receipts and $18,298 resulting from an
increase in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
8
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to
a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated
(limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas
revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2000 were for expenditures related to equipment upgrades on various oil
and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $2,574 received during the six months
ended June 30, 2001 were due to equipment credits received on one fully depleted
well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$88,265, of which $883 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$87,382 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $98,809, of which $988 was distributed to the
managing general partner and $97,821 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
9
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private
Investment, Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of
operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley Selected 85
Private Investment, Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
--------- ---------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 32,773 $ 39,610
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 78,218 45,630
--------- ---------
Total current assets 110,991 85,240
--------- ---------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on
the successful efforts accounting method 3,864,140 3,859,832
Accumulated depletion (3,441,568) (3,408,713)
--------- ---------
Net oil and gas properties 422,572 451,119
------- ---------
$ 533,563 $ 536,359
======= =========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 6,722 $ 8,178
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 7,892 7,905
Limited partners (117 interests) 518,949 520,276
------- ---------
526,841 528,181
$ 533,563 $ 536,359
======== =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- ------- -------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 441,200 $ 252,399 $ 206,099
Interest 3,585 1,728 2,200
------- ------- -------
444,785 254,127 208,299
------- ------- -------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 184,074 153,832 153,789
General and administrative 8,824 5,048 4,122
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 92,133
Depletion 31,732 33,899 118,737
------- ------- -------
224,630 192,779 368,781
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) $ 220,155 $ 61,348 $ (160,482)
------- ------- -------
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 2,202 $ 613 $ (1,605)
======= ======= =======
Limited partners $ 217,953 $ 60,735 $ (158,877)
======= ======= =======
Net income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $1,862.85 $ 519.10 $(1,357.92)
======== ======= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
-------- -------- -----
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 10,253 $ 752,707 $ 762,960
Distributions (756) (74,884) (75,640)
Net loss (1,605) (158,877) (160,482)
------ -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 7,892 518,946 526,838
Distributions (600) (59,405) (60,005)
Net income 613 60,735 61,348
------ -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 7,905 520,276 528,181
Distributions (2,215) (219,280) (221,495)
Net income 2,202 217,953 220,155
------ -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 7,892 $ 518,949 $ 526,841
======= ======= =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------- ------ -------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 220,155 $ 61,348 $ (160,482)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 92,133
Depletion 31,732 33,899 118,737
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (32,588) (22,369) 20,237
Accounts payable (1,456) 2,063 (3,647)
-------- ------ -------
Net cash provided by operating activities 217,843 74,941 66,978
-------- ------ -------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (3,185) (3,269) (4,417)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - - 3,057
-------- ------ -------
Net cash used in investing activities (3,185) (3,269) (1,360)
-------- ------ -------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (221,495) (60,005) (75,640)
-------- ------ -------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (6,837) 11,667 (10,022)
Cash at beginning of year 39,610 27,943 37,965
-------- ------ -------
Cash at end of year $ 32,773 $ 39,610 $ 27,943
======== ====== =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley Selected 85 Private Investment, Ltd. (the
"Partnership") is a limited partnership organized in 1985 under the laws of
the State of Texas. The Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer
Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the
7
respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and gas
properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline
in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of its
oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on proved
reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $92,133 related to its
proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $152,466 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- ------- --------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 220,155 $ 61,348 $ (160,482)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 28,649 30,978 116,164
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 92,133
Salvage income - - 2,904
Other, net (493) (727) 859
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 248,311 $ 91,599 $ 51,578
======== ======= ========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------- -------
Development costs $ 3,185 $ 3,269 $ 4,417
====== ======= =======
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
--------- ---------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 141,791 $ 141,791
Completed wells and equipment 3,722,349 3,718,041
--------- ---------
3,864,140 3,859,832
Accumulated depletion (3,441,568) (3,408,713)
Net oil and gas properties $ 422,572 $ 451,119
========= =========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 66,669 $ 78,823 $ 77,025
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 6,888 $ 1,886 $ 2,442
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA and
the Partnership are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to the Partnership and
Pioneer USA as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
-------------- -----------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated at
the Partnership level.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 186,210 271,087
Revisions (76,968) (74,549)
Production (15,439) (25,328)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 93,803 171,210
Revisions 121,880 243,365
Production (14,598) (27,627)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 201,085 386,948
Revisions 46,612 21,005
Production (15,698) (22,987)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 231,999 384,966
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net revenues
of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.63 per
barrel of oil, $13.32 per barrel of NGLs and $7.55 per mcf of gas, discounted at
10% was approximately $1,829,000 and undiscounted was approximately $3,687,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- ---------- ---------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 7,746 $ 4,941 $ 1,023
Future production costs (4,059) (2,870) (797)
------ ------- ------
3,687 2,071 226
10% annual discount factor (1,858) (980) (69)
------ ------- ------
Standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows $ 1,829 $ 1,091 $ 157
====== ======= ======
11
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- ---------- ---------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (257) $ (98) $ (53)
Net changes in prices and production costs 658 492 (426)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 328 882 (98)
Accretion of discount 109 16 70
Changes in production rates, timing and
other (100) (358) (32)
------ ------- ------
Change in present value of future net
revenues 738 934 (539)
------ ------- ------
Balance, beginning of year 1,091 157 696
------ ------- ------
Balance, end of year $ 1,829 $ 1,091 $ 157
====== ======= ======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 57% 49% -
Koch Midstream Services Company 9% 11% -
NGTS LLC 9% 10% -
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 10% 34%
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 52%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P. was
$26,039, which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing general partner and
operator of the Partnership's properties, all production expenses are
incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The majority of the
Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly by the
Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is initially
received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the
12
Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general
partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion
costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In
return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $4,690,000.
Pioneer USA was required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial
Partnership capital less commission and organization and offering costs
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to
the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
(A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 75% to $441,200 for 2000 as
compared to $252,399 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and a slight increase in production. In 2000, 9,509
barrels of oil, 6,189 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 22,987 mcf of
gas were sold, or 19,529 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 7,828
barrels of oil, 6,770 barrels of NGLs and 27,627 mcf of gas were sold, or 19,203
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.32, or 71%, from
$17.27 in 1999 to $29.59 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.03, or 48%, from $10.49 in 1999 to $15.52 in 2000. The average
price received per mcf of gas increased 66% from $1.67 in 1999 to $2.77 in 2000.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade,
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $224,630 as compared to $192,779
in 1999, an increase of $31,851, or 17%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $184,074 in 2000 and $153,832 in 1999, resulting in a
$30,242 increase, or 20%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production, offset by a decline in well maintenance costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
75% from $5,048 in 1999 to $8,824 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 2% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $6,888 in 2000 and $1,886 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $31,732 in 2000 as compared to $33,899 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $2,167, or 6%. This decrease was primarily due to a 28,956 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices, offset by an increase in oil production of 1,681 barrels for the period
ended December 31, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 22% to $252,399 from
$206,099 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 7,828 barrels of oil,
6,770 barrels of NGLs and 27,627 mcf of gas were sold, or 19,203 BOEs. In 1998,
9,075 barrels of oil, 6,364 barrels of NGLs and 25,328 mcf of gas were sold, or
19,660 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.83, or 28%, from
$13.44 in 1998 to $17.27 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.50, or 50%, from $6.99 in 1998 to $10.49 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 7% from $1.56 in 1998 to $1.67 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $192,779 as compared to $368,781
in 1998, a decrease of $176,002, or 48%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties and depletion, offset by
increases in G&A and production costs.
Production costs were $153,832 in 1999 and $153,789 in 1998, resulting in a $43
increase. The increase was due to increases in production taxes due to increased
oil and gas revenues and additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate
well production, offset by a decline in ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 22% from $4,122 in 1998 to $5,048 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 2% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $1,886 in
1999 and $2,442 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $92,133 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $33,899 in 1999 compared to $118,737 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $84,838, or 71%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 65,798 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of 1,247
barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in
1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $142,902 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $190,658, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $30,242, G&A expenses paid of $3,776 and working capital of $13,738. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $162,805 to oil and gas receipts and
an increase of $27,853 resulting from the increase in production during 2000.
The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production, offset by a decline in well maintenance costs.. The
increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 2% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on various oil and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $221,495, of which $2,215 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $219,280 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $60,005, of which
$600 was distributed to the managing general partner and $59,405 to the limited
partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY SELECTED 85 PRIVATE INVESTMENT, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 249,386 $ 196,468 $ 441,200 $ 252,399 $ 206,099 $ 324,463 $ 387,747
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 92,133 $ 258,548 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 27,488
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 132,687 $ 94,815 $ 220,155 $ 61,348 $ (160,482) $ (197,320) $ 165,606
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,327 $ 948 $ 2,202 $ 613 $ (1,605) $ (1,973) $ 1,656
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 131,360 $ 93,867 $ 217,953 $ 60,735 $ (158,877) $ (195,347) $ 163,950
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 1,122.74 $ 802.28 $ 1,862.85 $ 519.10 $(1,357.92) $(1,669.63) $ 1,401.28
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 746.85 $ 836.08 $ 1,874.19 $ 507.74 $ 640.03 $ 1,393.78 $ 1,583.47(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 583,036 $ 535,471 $ 533,563 $ 536,359 $ 532,953 $ 772,722 $1,133,345
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
---------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $234.94
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
86-A, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 86-A, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 10,131
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 13,871
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,717
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 170.04
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.14 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 54.68
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 58.31
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 156.87
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 164.88
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 225
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2036, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-3353A
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-2124884
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000........................................ 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000....................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001....................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.............................. 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................... 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations....................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K............................ 11
Signatures.................................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 72,545 $ 46,169
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 108,397 150,881
---------- ----------
Total current assets 180,942 197,050
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 7,132,242 7,132,242
Accumulated depletion (6,734,886) (6,721,529)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 397,356 410,713
---------- ----------
$ 578,298 $ 607,763
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 20,057 $ 12,398
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 4,275 4,647
Limited partners (10,131 interests) 553,966 590,718
---------- ----------
558,241 595,365
---------- ----------
$ 578,298 $ 607,763
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 190,561 $ 196,767 $ 410,079 $ 393,746
Interest 782 1,681 2,598 2,821
Gain on disposition of assets - 18,734 - 28,971
-------- -------- -------- --------
191,343 217,182 412,677 425,538
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 133,669 86,961 234,808 176,913
General and administrative 5,717 5,903 9,966 11,812
Depletion 6,758 6,831 13,357 13,894
-------- -------- -------- --------
146,144 99,695 258,131 202,619
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 45,199 $ 117,487 $ 154,546 $ 222,919
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 452 $ 1,175 $ 1,545 $ 2,229
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 44,747 $ 116,312 $ 153,001 $ 220,690
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited partnership
interest $ 4.41 $ 11.48 $ 15.10 $ 21.78
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 4,647 $ 590,718 $ 595,365
Distributions (1,917) (189,753) (191,670)
Net income 1,545 153,001 154,546
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 4,275 $ 553,966 $ 558,241
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 154,546 $ 222,919
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 13,357 13,894
Gain on disposition of assets - (28,971)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 42,484 (39,907)
Accounts payable 7,659 4,860
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 218,046 172,795
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties - (5,250)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 28,971
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities - 23,721
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (191,670) (205,060)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 26,376 (8,544)
Cash at beginning of period 46,169 76,838
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 72,545 $ 68,294
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 4% to $410,079 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $393,746 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 8,359 barrels
of oil, 4,940 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 20,166 mcf of gas were
7
sold, or 16,660 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 9,168 barrels of oil, 6,254 barrels of NGLs and 26,019 mcf of gas
were sold, or 19,759 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased slightly from $27.71 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.73 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.56, or 18%, from $14.19
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.75 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 142% from $1.96 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.74 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
A gain on disposition of assets of $28,971 was recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 resulting from equipment credits received on two fully
depleted wells.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $258,131 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $202,619 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$55,512, or 27%. This increase was due to an increase in production costs,
offset by declines in general and administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $234,808 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$176,913 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $57,895 increase, or 33%.
This increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
16% from $11,812 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $9,966 for the same
period in 2001. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decline in audit and
tax fees.
Depletion was $13,357 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$13,894 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $537, or 4%. This decrease
was primarily due to a decline in oil production of 809 barrels for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 3% to $190,561 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $196,767 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and lower
average prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
gas and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 4,389 barrels of oil,
2,558 barrels of NGLs and 9,290 mcf of gas were sold, or 8,495 BOEs. For the
8
three months ended June 30, 2000, 4,548 barrels of oil, 2,908 barrels of NGLs
and 11,558 mcf of gas were sold, or 9,382 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.67, or 2%, from $27.97
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.30 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.27, or 2%, from $14.53
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.80 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 50% from $2.36 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.54 for the same period in 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $18,734 was recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2000 resulting from equipment credits received on two fully
depleted wells.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $146,144 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $99,695 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$46,449, or 47%. This increase was due to an increase in production costs,
offset by declines in G&A and depletion.
Production costs were $133,669 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$86,961 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $46,708 increase, or 54%.
This increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 3% from $5,903 for the three months ended June
30, 2000 to $5,717 for the same period in 2001. The decrease is primarily
attributable to a decline in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $6,758 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$6,831 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $73, or 1%. This decrease was
primarily due to a decline in oil production of 159 barrels for the three months
ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $45,251 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase of $16,110 in oil and gas sales receipts and
reductions of $85,190 in working capital and $1,846 in G&A expenses, offset by
an increase of $57,895 in production costs. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $88,287 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $72,177 resulting from the
decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance
and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production. The decrease in G&A
was primarily due to a decline in audit and tax fees.
9
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities for the six months ended June
30, 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active
properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $28,971 received during the six months ended
June 30, 2000 were due to equipment credits received on two fully depleted
wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$191,670, of which $1,917 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$189,753 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $205,060, of which $2,051 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $203,009 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
10
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 6, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-3353-A
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-2124884
----------------------------------------- --------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$10,096,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited
partnership interests was 10,131.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 10,131 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers. Of the Partnership's total oil and
gas revenues for 2000 approximately 51% was attributable to sales made to Plains
Marketing, L.P. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser
would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil, natural gas
liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 32
oil and gas wells. Five wells were sold and one well was abandoned. At December
31, 2000, 26 wells were producing.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 10,131 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 962 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $462,584 and
$154,204, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 881,177 $ 555,781 $ 415,842 $ 605,964 $ 843,204
=========== =========== ========== ========== ===========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 290,690
=========== =========== ========== ========== ===========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ 12,800 $ 28,052 $ 23,593 $ 496,887 $ -
=========== =========== ========== ========== ===========
Net income (loss) $ 487,574 $ 96,423 $ (248,515) $ (467,727) $ 741,771
=========== =========== ========== ========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 4,876 $ 964 $ (2,485) $ (4,677) $ 7,417
=========== =========== ========== ========== ===========
Limited partners $ 482,698 $ 95,459 $ (246,030) $ (463,050) $ 734,354
=========== =========== ========== ========== ===========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 47.65 $ 9.42 $ (24.28) $ (45.71) $ 72.49
=========== =========== ========== ========== ===========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per
limited partnership
interest $ 45.66 $ 15.22 $ 9.42 $ 27.44 $ 94.54 (a)
=========== =========== ========== ========== ===========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $ 607,763 $ 594,270 $ 646,224 $ 1,000,424 $ 1,804,366
=========== =========== ========== ========== ===========
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $28.41
in 1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 59% to $881,177 for 2000 as
compared to $555,781 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decrease in production. In 2000, 18,760
barrels of oil, 13,025 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 56,549 mcf of
gas were sold, or 41,210 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 18,743
barrels of oil, 14,483 barrels of NGLs and 62,354 mcf of gas were sold, or
43,618 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $11.87, or 70%, from
$17.00 in 1999 to $28.87 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.31, or 55%, from $9.63 in 1999 to $14.94 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 63% from $1.57 in 1999 to $2.56 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $31,944 was recognized during 2000 resulting
from equipment credits on two fully depleted wells.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 2000 to $432,464 as compared to $463,135
in 1999, a decrease of $30,671, or 7%. The decrease was due to declines in
depletion and the impairment of oil and gas properties, offset by increases in
production costs and general and administrative expense ("G&A").
Production costs were $364,985 in 2000 and $341,430 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $23,555, or 7%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by a slight decline in
well maintenance costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
73% from $16,673 in 1999 to $28,772 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $24,184 in 2000 and $9,436 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
5
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long- lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized
non-cash charges of $12,800 and $28,052 related to its oil and gas properties
during 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Depletion was $25,907 in 2000 as compared to $76,980 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $51,073, or 66%. This decrease was primarily due to a 40,953 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges
taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 34% to $555,781 from
$415,842 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received and an increase in production from 1998 to 1999. In 1999, 18,743
barrels of oil, 14,483 barrels of NGLs and 62,354 mcf of gas were sold, or
43,618 BOEs. In 1998, 20,308 barrels of oil, 11,164 barrels of NGLs and 49,805
mcf of gas were sold, or 39,773 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.68, or 28%, from
$13.32 in 1998 to $17.00 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.10, or 47%, from $6.53 in 1998 to $9.63 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.46 in 1998 to $1.57 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $463,135 as compared to $669,121
in 1998, a decrease of $205,986, or 31%. The decrease was due to declines in
depletion and production costs, offset by increases in the impairment of oil and
gas properties and G&A.
Production costs were $341,430 in 1999 and $372,460 in 1998, resulting in a
$31,030 decrease, or 8%. The decrease was due to declines in workover costs,
well maintenance costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production
taxes due to an increase in oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 34% from $12,476 in 1998 to $16,673 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $9,436 in
1999 and $9,062 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized non-cash SFAS 121 charges of $28,052 and $23,593
related to its oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Depletion was $76,980 in 1999 compared to $260,592 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $183,612, or 70%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 148,893 barrels of oil during 1999 due to higher commodity
prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges
taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
6
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $229,299 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $328,536, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $23,555, G&A expenses paid of $12,099 and working capital of $63,583. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $364,711 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by a decrease of $36,175 resulting from a decrease in production during
2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by a slight decline in
well maintenance costs. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were for
expenditures related to oil and gas equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $31,944 received during 2000 were due to
equipment credits received on two fully depleted wells. Proceeds of $120 were
recognized in 1999 primarily from equipment credits received on active
properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $467,257, of which $4,673 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $462,584 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $155,762, of which
$1,558 was distributed to the managing general partner and $154,204 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report.......................................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999....................................................... 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................................. 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.................................................................... 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................................. 14
Notes to Financial Statements......................................................................... 15
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 46,169 $ 76,838
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 150,881 74,543
---------- ----------
Total current assets 197,050 151,381
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 7,132,242 7,125,711
Accumulated depletion (6,721,529) (6,682,822)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 410,713 442,889
---------- ----------
$ 607,763 $ 594,270
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 12,398 $ 19,222
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 4,647 4,444
Limited partners (10,131 interests) 590,718 570,604
---------- ----------
595,365 575,048
---------- ----------
$ 607,763 $ 594,270
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------------- -------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 881,177 $ 555,781 $ 415,842
Interest 6,917 3,777 4,764
Gain on disposition of assets 31,944 - -
--------- -------- ---------
920,038 559,558 420,606
--------- -------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 364,985 341,430 372,460
General and administrative 28,772 16,673 12,476
Depletion 25,907 76,980 260,592
Impairment of oil and gas properties 12,800 28,052 23,593
--------- -------- ---------
432,464 463,135 669,121
--------- -------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 487,574 $ 96,423 $ (248,515)
========== ========= ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 4,876 $ 964 $ (2,485)
========== ========= ==========
Limited partners $ 482,698 $ 95,459 $ (246,030)
========== ========= ==========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership
interest $ 47.65 $ 9.42 $ (24.28)
========== ========= ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------------- -------------- ---------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 8,487 $ 970,792 $ 979,279
Distributions (964) (95,413) (96,377)
Net loss (2,485) (246,030) (248,515)
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 5,038 629,349 634,387
Distributions (1,558) (154,204) (155,762)
Net income 964 95,459 96,423
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 4,444 570,604 575,048
Distributions (4,673) (462,584) (467,257)
Net income 4,876 482,698 487,574
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 4,647 $ 590,718 $ 595,365
========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 487,574 $ 96,423 $ (248,515)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 12,800 28,052 23,593
Depletion 25,907 76,980 260,592
Gain on disposition of assets (31,944) - -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (76,338) (26,964) 32,195
Accounts payable (6,824) 7,385 (9,308)
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 411,175 181,876 58,557
--------- -------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (6,531) (7,619) (22,830)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 31,944 120 -
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 25,413 (7,499) (22,830)
--------- -------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (467,257) (155,762) (96,377)
--------- -------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (30,669) 18,615 (60,650)
Cash at beginning of year 76,838 58,223 118,873
--------- -------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 46,169 $ 76,838 $ 58,223
========== ========= ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non- partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environ mental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $12,800, $28,052 and
$23,593 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $695,197 less
15
than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------------- -------------- --------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 487,574 $ 96,423 $ (248,515)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 16,131 66,147 251,615
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 12,800 28,052 23,593
Timing difference 67,848 - -
Other, net (1,032) (1,773) 2,118
---------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 583,321 $ 188,849 $ 28,811
========== ========== ==========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Development costs $ 6,531 $ 7,619 $ 22,830
========== ========= ==========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 264,211 $ 264,211
Completed wells and equipment 6,868,031 6,861,500
---------- ----------
7,132,242 7,125,711
Accumulated depletion (6,721,529) (6,682,822)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 410,713 $ 442,889
=========== ===========
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 167,350 $ 167,820 $ 161,913
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 24,184 $ 9,436 $ 9,062
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. In addition,
Pioneer USA and the Partnership are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer
USA (1) Partnership
------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs
and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 35 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
-------------------- -------------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 315,662 469,065
Revisions (123,571) (148,399)
Production (31,472) (49,805)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 160,619 270,861
Revisions 273,095 545,216
Production (33,226) (62,354)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 400,488 753,723
Revisions 83,992 171,142
Production (31,785) (56,549)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 452,695 868,316
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $12.60 per barrel of NGLs and $7.15 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $3,610,000 and undiscounted was $7,252,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year- end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
18
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ---------------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 15,459 $ 9,741 $ 1,763
Future production costs (8,207) (5,896) (1,433)
---------- ---------- ----------
7,252 3,845 330
10% annual discount factor (3,642) (1,727) (89)
---------- ---------- ----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 3,610 $ 2,118 $ 241
=========== =========== ===========
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ---------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (516) $ (214) $ (43)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,408 829 (761)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 753 1,942 (147)
Accretion of discount 212 24 113
Changes in production rates, timing and other (365) (704) (51)
---------- ----------- ----------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,492 1,877 (889)
---------- ----------- ----------
Balance, beginning of year 2,118 241 1,130
---------- ----------- ----------
Balance, end of year $ 3,610 $ 2,118 $ 241
=========== ============ ===========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 51% 48% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 62%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 7% 9% 29%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $31,479, which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
19
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing
general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all
production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$10,131,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1%
of initial Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement
to the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 45 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts
21
Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981 from the
University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business Development
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief Financial
Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr. Dove joined
Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and was promoted
to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in which
position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley, Mr.
Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus Energy
Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 25% of its operating and general
and administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated approximately
25% of the Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 35 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
23
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 167,350 $ 167,820 $ 161,913
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 24,184 $ 9,436 $ 9,062
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes
thereto, or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
Dated: March 28, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
-----------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 28, 2001
--------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 28, 2001
-------------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 28, 2001
-------------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 28, 2001
-------------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 28, 2001
-------------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 28, 2001
-------------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to
Item 14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Amended and Restated Certificate of -
Limited Partnership of Parker & Parsley
86-A, Ltd. incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3a of the Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-3353) (hereinafter called the Partnership's
Registration Statement)
4(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of -
Parker & Parsley 86-A, Ltd. incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A of Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement
4(b) Form of Subscription Agreement incorporated by
reference to Exhibit C of Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement -
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to -
an Exhibit of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4c of the Partnership's Registration Statement
10(b) Development Program Agreement incorporated -
by reference to Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1
of the Partnership's Registration Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-A, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 410,079 $ 393,746 $ 881,177 $ 555,781 $ 415,842 $ 605,964 $ 843,204
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 290,690
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ 12,800 $ 28,052 $ 23,593 $ 496,887 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 154,546 $ 222,919 $ 487,574 $ 96,423 $ (248,515) $ (467,727) $ 741,771
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,545 $ 2,229 $ 4,876 $ 964 $ (2,485) $ (4,677) $ 7,417
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 153,001 $ 220,690 $ 482,698 $ 95,459 $ (246,030) $ (463,050) $ 734,354
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 15.10 $ 21.78 $ 47.65 $ 9.42 $ (24.28) $ (45.71) $ 72.49
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per
limited partnership
interest $ 18.73 $ 20.04 $ 45.66 $ 15.22 $ 9.42 $ 27.44 $ 94.54(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 578,298 $ 616,989 $ 607,763 $ 594,270 $ 646,224 $1,000,424 $1,804,366
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $28.41
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
86-B, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 86-B, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 17,208
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 27,115
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 3,935
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 230.38
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.70 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 134.43
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 128.81
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 213.91
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 223.64
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 235
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2036, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-3353B
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-2140235
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000...................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000..................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001..................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and 2000............................ 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................. 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations..................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.......................... 11
Signatures................................................ 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 445,146 $ 220,466
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 197,873 260,049
----------- -----------
Total current assets 643,019 480,515
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 11,812,935 11,805,173
Accumulated depletion (10,091,305) (10,032,733)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,721,630 1,772,440
----------- -----------
$ 2,364,649 $ 2,252,955
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 29,355 $ 15,305
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 22,076 21,100
Limited partners (17,208 interests) 2,313,218 2,216,550
----------- -----------
2,335,294 2,237,650
----------- -----------
$ 2,364,649 $ 2,252,955
=========== ===========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 409,078 $ 392,916 $ 847,551 $ 795,048
Interest 3,245 4,323 6,906 7,395
Gain on disposition of assets - 831 - 2,250
-------- -------- -------- --------
412,323 398,070 854,457 804,693
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 185,876 170,553 354,327 339,664
General and administrative 12,273 11,787 25,427 23,851
Depletion 28,886 23,496 58,572 57,494
-------- -------- -------- --------
227,035 205,836 438,326 421,009
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 185,288 $ 192,234 $ 416,131 $ 383,684
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,853 $ 1,922 $ 4,161 $ 3,837
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 183,435 $ 190,312 $ 411,970 $ 379,847
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 10.66 $ 11.06 $ 23.94 $ 22.07
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 21,100 $2,216,550 $2,237,650
Distributions (3,185) (315,302) (318,487)
Net income 4,161 411,970 416,131
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 22,076 $2,313,218 $2,335,294
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 416,131 $ 383,684
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 58,572 57,494
Gain on disposition of assets - (2,250)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 62,176 (28,686)
Accounts payable 14,050 17,359
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 550,929 427,601
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (7,762) (17,471)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 4,846
--------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (7,762) (12,625)
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (318,487) (408,087)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 224,680 6,889
Cash at beginning of period 220,466 206,408
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 445,146 $ 213,297
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 7% to $847,551 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $795,048 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 18,401 barrels
of oil, 7,150 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 43,243 mcf of gas were
7
sold, or 32,758 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 20,591 barrels of oil, 10,406 barrels of NGLs and 41,035 mcf of
gas were sold, or 37,836 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.31, or 1%, from $27.57
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.88 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.05, or 23%, from
$13.43 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.48 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 135% from $2.13 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.01 for the same period in 2001. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
A gain on disposition of assets of $2,250 was received during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 due to equipment credits received on one fully depleted
well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $438,326 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $421,009 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$17,317, or 4%. This increase was due to increases in production costs, general
and administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $354,327 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$339,664 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $14,663 increase, or 4%.
The increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production and higher production taxes associated with higher oil
and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
7%, from $23,851 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $25,427 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $58,572 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$57,494 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,078, or 2%. This increase
was due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June 30, 2001
due to lower commodity prices, offset by a reduction in the Partnership's net
depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121") during the
fourth quarter of 2000 and a decline in oil production of 2,190 barrels for the
six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 4% to $409,078 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $392,916 for the same period in 2000.
8
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a decrease in production and lower average prices received
for oil. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 9,425 barrels of oil, 4,390
barrels of NGLs and 23,194 mcf of gas were sold, or 17,681 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 9,770 barrels of oil, 5,347 barrels of NGLs and
20,600 mcf of gas were sold, or 18,550 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.68, or 2%, from $27.55
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.87 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.31, or 10%, from
$13.48 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.79 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 56% from $2.51
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.92 for the same period in
2001.
A gain on disposition of assets of $831 was received during the three months
ended June 30, 2000 due to equipment credits received on one fully depleted
well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $227,035 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $205,836 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$21,199, or 10%. This increase was due to increases in production costs,
depletion and G&A.
Production costs were $185,876 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$170,553 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $15,323 increase, or 9%. The
increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A increased 4%, from $11,787 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $12,273 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a higher
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $28,886 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$23,496 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $5,390, or 23%. This
increase was due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 2000 and a decline in oil production of 345
barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period
in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $123,328 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $52,014 in oil and gas
sale receipts and reductions in working capital of $87,553, offset by increases
in production costs of $14,663 and G&A expenses of $1,576. The increase in oil
and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001
which contributed an additional $155,662 to oil and gas receipts, offset by
$103,648 resulting from the decline in production during 2001 as compared to the
9
same period in 2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to
additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production and
increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices. The
increase in G&A was primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 were related to expenditures for upgrades of oil and gas equipment on
active properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $4,846 recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 consisted of $2,250 from equipment credits on one fully
depleted well and $2,596 from equipment credits on an active property.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$318,487, of which $3,185 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$315,302 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $408,087, of which $4,081 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $404,006 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
10
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 7, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-3353B
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-2140235
----------------------------------------- --------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$17,080,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited
partnership interests was 17,208.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 17,208 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 36% and 16% were attributable to sales
made to Plains Marketing, L.P. and Mobil Oil Corporation, respectively. Pioneer
USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not have an
adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and
gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 56
oil and gas wells. At December 31, 2000, 43 wells were producing. Nine wells and
interests in two abandoned wells were sold and two wells were plugged and
abandoned.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 17,208 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 1,409 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $923,558 and
$357,887, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 1,756,242 $ 1,056,533 $ 928,899 $ 1,369,807 $ 1,700,251
========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 565,756
========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ 13,279 $ - $ 509,585 $ 561,432 $ 4,960
========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) $ 933,292 $ 246,008 $ (807,041) $ (158,796) $ 1,229,639
========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 9,333 $ 2,460 $ (8,070) $ (1,587) $ 12,296
========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 923,959 $ 243,548 $ (798,971) $ (157,209) $ 1,217,343
========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 53.69 $ 14.15 $ (46.43) $ (9.14) $ 70.74
========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 53.67 $ 20.80 $ 18.70 $ 46.77 $ 86.49 (a)
========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $ 2,252,955 $ 2,266,438 $ 2,363,955 $ 3,520,172 $ 4,548,338
========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $32.55
in 1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 66% to $1,756,242 for 2000 as
compared to $1,056,533 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 41,276
barrels of oil, 21,061 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 79,859 mcf of
gas were sold, or 75,647 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 40,490
barrels of oil, 22,642 barrels of NGLs and 86,726 mcf of gas were sold, or
77,586 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.27, or 71%, from
$17.18 in 1999 to $29.45 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.61, or 60%, from $9.39 in 1999 to $15.00 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 65% from $1.71 in 1999 to $2.82 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $21,074 was received during 2000 due to the
sale of equipment on one plugged and abandoned well. Abandoned property costs of
$12,161 were also incurred during 2000 to plug and abandon this well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $861,600 as compared to $821,102
in 1999, an increase of $40,498, or 5%. The increase was due to increases in
production costs, general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), the impairment of
oil and gas properties and abandoned property costs, offset by a decline in
depletion.
Production costs were $670,780 in 2000 and $611,991 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $58,789, or 10%. This increase was primarily due to higher
production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
66% from $31,696 in 1999 to $52,687 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $44,975 in 2000 and $19,909 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated
5
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $13,279 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $112,693 in 2000 as compared to $177,415 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $64,722, or 36%. This decrease was primarily due to a 65,045 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 14% to $1,056,533 from
$928,899 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 40,490 barrels of oil,
22,642 barrels of NGLs and 86,726 mcf of gas were sold, or 77,586 BOEs. In 1998,
47,107 barrels of oil, 23,292 barrels of NGLs and 97,715 mcf of gas were sold,
or 86,685 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $4.10, or 31%, from
$13.08 in 1998 to $17.18 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.59, or 38%, from $6.80 in 1998 to $9.39 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.58 in 1998 to $1.71 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $6,371 was recognized during 1998 from the
sale of equipment on one well plugged and abandoned during 1998. Abandoned
property costs of $20,389 were also incurred during 1998 to plug and abandon
this well.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $821,102 as compared to $1,755,278
in 1998, a decrease of $934,176, or 53%. The decrease was due to declines in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion, production costs and abandoned
property costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $611,991 in 1999 and $662,691 in 1998, resulting in a
$50,700 decrease, or 8%. This decrease was due to lower well maintenance costs
and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A increased 14% from $27,867 in 1998 to $31,696 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $19,909 in
1999 and $21,984 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $509,585 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1998.
6
Depletion was $177,415 in 1999 compared to $534,746 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $357,331, or 67%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 343,529 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of 6,617
barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in
1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $561,909 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $706,708, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $58,789, G&A expenses paid of $20,991, abandoned costs paid of $12,161 and
working capital of $52,858. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from
the increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an additional
$726,611 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $19,903 resulting from the decline
in production during 2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to
increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was
primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to
expenditures for oil and gas equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $23,670 was recognized during 2000. The
gain was comprised of $21,074 received from the sale of equipment on one well
plugged and abandoned during the current period and $2,596 from equipment
credits received on one active well. Proceeds of $8,980 in 1999 were from
equipment credits received on active properties.
7
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $932,887, of which $9,329 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $923,558 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $361,502, of which
$3,615 was distributed to the managing general partner and $357,887 to the
limited partners.
8
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report.......................................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999....................................................... 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................................. 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.................................................................... 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................................. 14
Notes to Financial Statements......................................................................... 15
9
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
------------------ ------------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 220,466 $ 206,408
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 260,049 179,740
------------ -----------
Total current assets 480,515 386,148
------------ -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 11,805,173 12,044,833
Accumulated depletion (10,032,733) (10,164,543)
------------ -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,772,440 1,880,290
------------ -----------
$ 2,252,955 $ 2,266,438
============= ============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 15,305 $ 29,193
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 21,100 21,096
Limited partners (17,208 interests) 2,216,550 2,216,149
------------ -----------
2,237,650 2,237,245
------------ -----------
$ 2,252,955 $ 2,266,438
============= ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 1,756,242 $ 1,056,533 $ 928,899
Interest 17,576 10,577 12,967
Gain on disposition of assets 21,074 - 6,371
---------- ----------- ----------
1,794,892 1,067,110 948,237
---------- ----------- ----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 670,780 611,991 662,691
General and administrative 52,687 31,696 27,867
Impairment of oil and gas properties 13,279 - 509,585
Depletion 112,693 177,415 534,746
Abandoned property 12,161 - 20,389
---------- ----------- ----------
861,600 821,102 1,755,278
---------- ----------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 933,292 $ 246,008 $ (807,041)
=========== ============ ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 9,333 $ 2,460 $ (8,070)
=========== ============ ===========
Limited partners $ 923,959 $ 243,548 $ (798,971)
=========== ============ ===========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 53.69 $ 14.15 $ (46.43)
=========== ============ ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------------- --------------- ----------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 33,572 $ 3,451,264 $ 3,484,836
Distributions (3,251) (321,805) (325,056)
Net loss (8,070) (798,971) (807,041)
---------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 22,251 2,330,488 2,352,739
Distributions (3,615) (357,887) (361,502)
Net income 2,460 243,548 246,008
---------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 21,096 2,216,149 2,237,245
Distributions (9,329) (923,558) (932,887)
Net income 9,333 923,959 933,292
---------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 21,100 $ 2,216,550 $ 2,237,650
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 933,292 $ 246,008 $ (807,041)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 13,279 - 509,585
Depletion 112,693 177,415 534,746
Gain on disposition of assets (21,074) - (6,371)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (80,309) (59,316) 47,751
Accounts payable (13,888) 17,977 (24,120)
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 943,993 382,084 254,550
--------- -------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (20,718) (8,474) (19,495)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 23,670 8,980 15,526
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 2,952 506 (3,969)
--------- -------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (932,887) (361,502) (325,056)
--------- -------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 14,058 21,088 (74,475)
Cash at beginning of year 206,408 185,320 259,795
--------- -------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 220,466 $ 206,408 $ 185,320
========== ========= ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the unit-of-
production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil (dominant
mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants. The
carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the
15
respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non- partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $13,279 and $509,585
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000 and 1998, respectively.
16
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $38,785 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 933,292 $ 246,008 $ (807,041)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 104,139 168,298 525,430
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 13,279 - 509,585
Intangible development costs capitalized for
financial reporting purposes and expensed
for tax reporting purposes (13,305) - -
Other, net (142) 11,789 6,831
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 1,037,263 $ 426,095 $ 234,805
========== ========== ==========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Development costs $ 20,718 $ 8,474 $ 19,495
=========== ========== ==========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
------------------ ------------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 439,613 $ 444,922
Completed wells and equipment 11,365,560 11,599,911
------------ ------------
11,805,173 12,044,833
Accumulated depletion (10,032,733) (10,164,543)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,772,440 $ 1,880,290
============= =============
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
17
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 298,127 $ 298,479 $ 296,383
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 44,975 $ 19,909 $ 21,984
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. In addition,
Pioneer USA and the Partnership are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer
USA (1) Partnership
-------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs
and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 128 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
18
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
-------------------- -------------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 940,047 1,239,206
Revisions (401,595) (457,837)
Production (70,399) (97,715)
----------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 468,053 683,654
Revisions 550,528 841,323
Production (63,132) (86,726)
----------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 955,449 1,438,251
Revisions 42,519 (145,295)
Production (62,337) (79,859)
----------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 935,631 1,213,097
=========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.61 per barrel of NGLs and $7.82 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $7,100,000 and undiscounted was $14,263,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
19
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ---------------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 30,354 $ 23,606 $ 5,045
Future production costs (16,091) (13,697) (3,839)
---------- ---------- ----------
14,263 9,909 1,206
10% annual discount factor (7,163) (4,671) (387)
---------- ---------- ----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 7,100 $ 5,238 $ 819
=========== =========== ===========
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ---------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (1,085) $ (445) $ (266)
Net changes in prices and production costs 2,757 2,398 (2,377)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 121 3,891 (547)
Accretion of discount 524 82 377
Changes in production rates, timing and other (455) (1,507) (140)
---------- ----------- ----------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,862 4,419 (2,953)
---------- ----------- ----------
Balance, beginning of year 5,238 819 3,772
---------- ----------- ----------
Balance, end of year $ 7,100 $ 5,238 $ 819
=========== ============ ===========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 36% 35% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 41%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 2% 4% 17%
Mobil Oil Corporation 16% 15% 15%
Texaco Trading & Transportation 4% 8% 10%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
and Mobil Oil Corporation were $54,631 and $21,954, respectively, which are
included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the
accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating
20
and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$17,208,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1%
of initial Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement
to the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
21
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
22
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
23
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 25% of its operating and general
and administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated approximately
25% of the Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Note 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 128 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
24
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 298,127 $ 298,479 $ 296,383
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 44,975 $ 19,909 $ 21,984
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
25
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes
thereto, or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
26
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
Dated: March 29, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 29, 2001
--------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 29, 2001
-------------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 29, 2001
-------------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 29, 2001
-------------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 29, 2001
-------------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 29, 2001
-------------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to
Item 14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Amended and Restated Certificate of -
Limited Partnership of Parker & Parsley
86-B, Ltd. incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3a of the Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-3353) (hereinafter called the Partnership's
Registration Statement)
4(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of -
Parker & Parsley 86-B, Ltd. incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A of Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement
4(b) Form of Subscription Agreement incorporated by
reference to Exhibit C of Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement -
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to -
an Exhibit of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4c of the Partnership's Registration Statement
10(b) Development Program Agreement incorporated -
by reference to Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1
of the Partnership's Registration Statement
28
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-B, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 847,551 $ 795,048 $1,756,242 $1,056,533 $ 928,899 $1,369,807 $1,700,251
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 565,756
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ 13,279 $ -- $ 509,585 $ 561,432 $ 4,960
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 416,131 $ 383,684 $ 933,292 $ 246,008 $ (807,041) $ (158,796) $1,229,639
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 4,161 $ 3,837 $ 9,333 $ 2,460 $ (8,070) $ (1,587) $ 12,296
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 411,970 $ 379,847 $ 923,959 $ 243,548 $ (798,971) $ (157,209) $1,217,343
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 23.94 $ 22.07 $ 53.69 $ 14.15 $ (46.43) $ (9.14) $ 70.74
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 18.32 $ 23.48 $ 53.67 $ 20.80 $ 18.70 $ 46.77 $ 86.49(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total ended $2,364,649 $2,259,394 $2,252,955 $2,266,438 $2,363,955 $3,520,172 $4,548,338
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $32.55
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
86-C, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 86-C, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 19,317
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 28,723
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding
Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 3,185
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 165.38
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.01 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 104.90
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 98.36
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 151.00
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 160.54
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 225
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2036, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-3353C
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-2142283
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 and 2000........................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 441,080 $ 161,347
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 213,975 296,462
----------- -----------
Total current assets 655,055 457,809
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 14,602,482 14,598,140
Accumulated depletion (13,168,721) (13,107,930)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,433,761 1,490,210
----------- -----------
$ 2,088,816 $ 1,948,019
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 43,231 $ 30,112
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 19,148 17,871
Limited partners (19,317 interests) 2,026,437 1,900,036
----------- -----------
2,045,585 1,917,907
----------- -----------
$ 2,088,816 $ 1,948,019
=========== ===========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 422,897 $ 439,126 $ 955,101 $ 856,273
Interest 3,190 3,246 6,452 5,700
-------- -------- -------- --------
426,087 442,372 961,553 861,973
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 215,988 231,517 433,153 448,472
General and administrative 12,687 13,174 28,653 25,688
Depletion 29,568 36,749 60,791 79,906
-------- -------- -------- --------
258,243 281,440 522,597 554,066
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 167,844 $ 160,932 $ 438,956 $ 307,907
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,679 $ 1,609 $ 4,390 $ 3,079
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 166,165 $ 159,323 $ 434,566 $ 304,828
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited partnership
interest $ 8.61 $ 8.25 $ 22.50 $ 15.78
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 17,871 $1,900,036 $1,917,907
Distributions (3,113) (308,165) (311,278)
Net income 4,390 434,566 438,956
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 19,148 $2,026,437 $2,045,585
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 438,956 $ 307,907
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 60,791 79,906
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 82,487 (29,385)
Accounts payable 13,119 14,845
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 595,353 373,273
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (4,653) (11,614)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 311 -
--------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (4,342) (11,614)
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (311,278) (351,708)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 279,733 9,951
Cash at beginning of period 161,347 142,687
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 441,080 $ 152,638
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results of operations are not
necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may
have been made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June
30, 2001 financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 12% to $955,101 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $856,273 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a decrease in production and lower average prices received
for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 19,403 barrels of oil, 10,669
7
barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 54,393 mcf of gas were sold, or
39,138 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 21,638 barrels of oil, 12,002 barrels of NGLs and 45,739 mcf of gas were
sold, or 41,263 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.22, or 1%, from $27.64
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.42 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.26, or 16%, from
$13.72 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.98 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 126% from $2.05
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.64 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $522,597 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $554,066 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $31,469,
or 6%. This decrease was due to declines in depletion and production costs,
offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $433,153 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$448,472 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $15,319 decrease, or 3%.
This decrease was due to lower well maintenance and workover costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
12% from $25,688 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $28,653 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $60,791 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$79,906 for the same period in 2000, a decline of $19,115, or 24%. This decrease
was due to upward revisions in proved reserves on three significant wells during
the period ended June 30, 2001 and a decrease in oil production of 2,235 barrels
for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 4% to $422,897 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $439,126 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and lower
average prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
gas and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 9,459 barrels of oil,
5,538 barrels of NGLs and 25,535 mcf of gas were sold, or 19,253 BOEs. For the
8
three months ended June 30, 2000, 10,480 barrels of oil, 6,550 barrels of NGLs
and 23,989 mcf of gas were sold, or 21,028 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.86, or 3%, from $27.72
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.86 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.24, or 2%, from $13.79
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.03 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 47% from $2.43 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.57 for the same period in 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $258,243 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $281,440 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$23,197, or 8%. This decrease was due to declines in production costs, depletion
and G&A.
Production costs were $215,988 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$231,517 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $15,529 decrease, or 7%.
This decrease was primarily due to lower workover and well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A decreased 4% from $13,174 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $12,687 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a
decrease in audit and tax fees
Depletion was $29,568 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$36,749 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $7,181, or 20%. This decrease
was primarily due to upward revisions to proved reserves on three significant
wells during the period ended June 30, 2001 and a decrease in oil production of
1,021 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $222,080 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase of $99,580 in oil and gas receipts and
reductions of $110,146 in working capital and $15,319 in production costs,
offset by an increase in G&A expenses of $2,965. The increase in oil and gas
receipts resulted from the increase in gas and NGL prices of $145,824 during
2001, offset by a decline of $42,415 in production and a $3,829 decline
resulting from lower oil prices as compared to the same period in 2000. The
decrease in production costs was primarily due to lower well maintenance and
workover costs. The increase in G&A was primarily due to a higher percentage of
the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit
and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 were related to expenditures for equipment upgrades on active
properties.
9
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $311 recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2001 were due to equipment credits received on an active
property.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$311,278, of which $3,113 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$308,165 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $351,708, of which $3,517 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $348,191 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
10
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 8, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
-------------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-3353C
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-2142283
-------------------------------- ------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$19,257,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 19,317.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 19,317 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 37% and 15% were attributable to sales
made to Plains Marketing, L.P. and TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC, respectively. Pioneer
USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not have an
adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and
gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 60
productive oil and gas wells. Four wells were sold and three wells were
abandoned due to uneconomical operations. At December 31, 2000, 53 wells were
producing.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 19,317 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 1,332 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $821,264 and
$236,960, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating results:
------------------
Oil and gas sales $1,865,405 $1,067,096 $ 973,632 $1,484,170 $1,750,717
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 704,864
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ - $ 26,652 $ 277,277 $ 895,701 $ 132,778
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) $ 828,383 $ 105,421 $ (423,942) $ (577,071) $1,142,509
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 8,284 $ 1,054 $ (4,240) $ (5,770) $ 11,425
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 820,099 $ 104,367 $ (419,702) $ (571,301) $1,131,084
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 42.45 $ 5.40 $ (21.73) $ (29.58) $ 58.55
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
limited partnership
interest $ 42.52 $ 12.27 $ 15.20 $ 37.84 $ 69.40(a)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
At year end:
------------
Identifiable assets $1,948,019 $1,958,255 $2,071,111 $2,820,637 $4,193,447
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $36.12
in 1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 75% to $1,865,405 for 2000 as
compared to $1,067,096 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a slight decline in production. In 2000,
41,783 barrels of oil, 24,546 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 95,610
mcf of gas were sold, or 82,264 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999,
37,899 barrels of oil, 26,995 barrels of NGLs and 105,081 mcf of gas were sold,
or 82,408 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in
the future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.25, or 71%, from
$17.18 in 1999 to $29.43 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.79, or 62%, from $9.27 in 1999 to $15.06 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 76% from $1.58 in 1999 to $2.78 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $1,051,119 as compared to $969,444
in 1999, an increase of $81,675, or 8%. The increase was due to increases in
production costs and general and administrative ("G&A") expenses, offset by
declines in depletion and the impairment of oil and gas properties.
Production costs were $848,089 in 2000 and $713,921 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $134,168, or 19%. The increase was primarily due to additional well
maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production and higher
production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
75% from $32,012 in 1999 to $55,962 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $46,688 in 2000 and $17,953 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $26,652 related to its oil and gas properties during 1999.
Depletion was $147,068 in 2000 compared to $196,859 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $49,791, or 25%. This decrease was primarily due to a 158,291
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1999,
offset by an increase in oil production of 3,884 barrels for the period ended
December 31, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 10% to $1,067,096 from
$973,632 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 37,899 barrels of oil,
26,995 barrels of NGLs and 105,081 mcf of gas were sold, or 82,408 BOEs. In
1998, 44,016 barrels of oil, 30,658 barrels of NGLs and 129,149 mcf of gas were
sold, or 96,199 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.92, or 30%, from
$13.26 in 1998 to $17.18 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGL's
increased $2.81, or 43%, from $6.46 in 1998 to $9.27 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 6% from $1.49 in 1998 to $1.58 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $969,444 as compared to $1,406,971
in 1998, a decrease of $437,527, or 31%. The decrease was due to declines in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset by
an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $713,921 in 1999 and $737,587 in 1998, resulting in a
$23,666 decrease, or 3%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 10% from $29,209 in 1998 to $32,012 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $17,953 in
1999 and $21,776 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized non-cash SFAS 121 charges of $26,652 and $277,277
related to its oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Depletion was $196,859 in 1999 compared to $362,898 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $166,039, or 46%. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in
proved reserves of 291,530 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of
6
1998 and a decline in oil production of 6,117 barrels for the period ended
December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $596,449 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $804,637, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $134,168, G&A expenses paid of $23,950 and working capital of $50,070. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $753,537 to oil and gas receipts and
an increase of $51,100 resulting from the increase in oil production during
2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A
was primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A
being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased
oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to
expenditures for oil and gas equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $847 were recognized during 1999 from
equipment credits received on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $829,560, of which $8,296 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $821,264 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $239,353, of which
$2,393 was distributed to the managing general partner and $236,960 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 14
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 15
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- ----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 161,347 $ 142,687
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 296,462 194,380
---------- ----------
Total current assets 457,809 337,067
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on
the successful efforts accounting method 14,598,140 14,582,050
Accumulated depletion (13,107,930) (12,960,862)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,490,210 1,621,188
---------- ----------
$ 1,948,019 $ 1,958,255
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 30,112 $ 39,171
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 17,871 17,883
Limited partners (19,317 interests) 1,900,036 1,901,201
---------- ----------
1,917,907 1,919,084
---------- ----------
$ 1,948,019 $ 1,958,255
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $1,865,405 $1,067,096 $ 973,632
Interest 14,097 7,769 9,397
--------- --------- ---------
1,879,502 1,074,865 983,029
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 848,089 713,921 737,587
General and administrative 55,962 32,012 29,209
Impairment of oil and gas properties - 26,652 277,277
Depletion 147,068 196,859 362,898
--------- --------- ---------
1,051,119 969,444 1,406,971
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 828,383 $ 105,421 $ (423,942)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 8,284 $ 1,054 $ (4,240)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 820,099 $ 104,367 $ (419,702)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 42.45 $ 5.40 $ (21.73)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
-------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 26,428 $2,747,103 $2,773,531
Distributions (2,966) (293,607) (296,573)
Net loss (4,240) (419,702) (423,942)
-------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 19,222 2,033,794 2,053,016
Distributions (2,393) (236,960) (239,353)
Net income 1,054 104,367 105,421
-------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 17,883 1,901,201 1,919,084
Distributions (8,296) (821,264) (829,560)
Net income 8,284 820,099 828,383
-------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 17,871 $1,900,036 $1,917,907
======== ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- -------- -------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 828,383 $ 105,421 $(423,942)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - 26,652 277,277
Depletion 147,068 196,859 362,898
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (102,082) (82,147) 91,550
Accounts payable (9,059) 21,076 (29,011)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 864,310 267,861 278,772
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (16,090) (13,291) (19,770)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 847 626
-------- -------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities (16,090) (12,444) (19,144)
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (829,560) (239,353) (296,573)
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 18,660 16,064 (36,945)
Cash at beginning of year 142,687 126,623 163,568
-------- -------- --------
Cash at end of year $ 161,347 $ 142,687 $ 126,623
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions $26,652 and $277,277
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $533,255 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
15
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 828,383 $ 105,421 $(423,942)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 132,379 182,068 348,153
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - 26,652 277,277
Salvage income - - 431
Other, net (2,097) (2,839) 4,014
-------- -------- --------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 958,665 $ 311,302 $ 205,933
======== ======== ========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Development costs $ 16,090 $ 13,291 $ 19,770
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------- ----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 645,990 $ 645,990
Completed wells and equipment 13,952,150 13,936,060
---------- ----------
14,598,140 14,582,050
Accumulated depletion (13,107,930) (12,960,862)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,490,210 $ 1,621,188
=========== ===========
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 373,973 $ 354,129 $ 348,965
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 46,688 $ 17,953 $ 21,776
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. In addition,
Pioneer USA and the Partnership are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
--------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs
and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 60 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 831,525 1,374,642
Revisions (383,916) (502,202)
Production (74,674) (129,149)
----------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 372,935 743,291
Revisions 507,962 924,982
Production (64,894) (105,081)
----------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 816,003 1,563,192
Revisions 148,591 (208,305)
Production (66,329) (95,610)
----------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 898,265 1,259,277
=========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.39 per barrel of NGLs and $7.64 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $6,568,000 and undiscounted was $12,019,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
18
For the years ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 29,187 $ 20,004 $ 4,058
Future production costs (17,168) (12,833) (3,287)
--------- --------- --------
12,019 7,171 771
10% annual discount factor (5,451) (3,031) (217)
--------- --------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 6,568 $ 4,140 $ 554
========= ========= =======
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (1,017) $ (353) $ (236)
Net changes in prices and production costs 2,672 1,767 (2,176)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 714 3,173 (425)
Accretion of discount 414 55 323
Changes in production rates, timing and other (355) (1,056) (163)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 2,428 3,586 (2,677)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 4,140 554 3,231
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 6,568 $ 4,140 $ 554
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 37% 36% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 15% 14% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 50%
Western Gas Resources Inc. 5% 7% 31%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
and TEPPCO Crude Oil LLP were $72,179 and $15,378, respectively, which are
included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the
accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The general partner of the Partnership is
Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA, the managing general partner, has the power
and authority to manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs.
As managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's
properties, all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and
billed to the Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas
revenues are received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of
the oil and gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to
being paid to the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement,
the managing general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the
Partnership's revenues.
19
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$19,317,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1%
of initial Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement
to the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 25% of its operating and general
and administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated approximately
25% of the Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 60 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
23
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $373,973 $ 354,129 $348,965
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 46,688 $ 17,953 $ 21,776
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
Dated: March 27, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 27, 2001
------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 27, 2001
------------------------------ Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 27, 2001
------------------------------ Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 27, 2001
------------------------------ Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 27, 2001
------------------------------ Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 27, 2001
------------------------------ Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to
Item 14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Amended and Restated Certificate of -
Limited Partnership of Parker & Parsley
86-C, Ltd. incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3a of the Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-3353) (hereinafter called the Partnership's
Registration Statement)
4(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of -
Parker & Parsley 86-C, Ltd. incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A of Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement
4(b) Form of Subscription Agreement incorporated by
reference to Exhibit C of Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement -
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to an -
Exhibit of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4c of the Partnership's Registration Statement
10(b) Development Program Agreement incorporated -
by reference to Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1
of the Partnership's Registration Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 86-C, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 955,101 $ 856,273 $1,865,405 $1,067,096 $ 973,632 $1,484,170 $1,750,717
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 704,864
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 26,652 $ 277,277 $ 895,701 $ 132,778
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 438,956 $ 307,907 $ 828,383 $ 105,421 $ (423,942) $ (577,071) $1,142,509
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 4,390 $ 3,079 $ 8,284 $ 1,054 $ (4,240) $ (5,770) $ 11,425
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 434,566 $ 304,828 $ 820,099 $ 104,367 $ (419,702) $ (571,301) $1,131,084
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 22.50 $ 15.78 $ 42.45 $ 5.40 $ (21.73) $ (29.58) $ 58.55
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
limited partnership
interest $ 15.95 $ 18.03 $ 42.52 $ 12.27 $ 15.20 $ 37.84 $ 69.40(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $2,088,816 $1,929,299 $1,948,019 $1,958,255 $2,071,111 $2,820,637 $4,193,447
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $36.12
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
Private Investment 86, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated
October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 4,920
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 8,041
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding
Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 1,328
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 269.95
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.77 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 187.43
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 183.56
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 254.82
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 261.93
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 225
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its
partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2036, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 133,451 $ 57,176
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 68,057 90,053
---------- ----------
Total current assets 201,508 147,229
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 4,034,151 4,032,771
Accumulated depletion (3,289,733) (3,261,600)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 744,418 771,171
---------- ----------
$ 945,926 $ 918,400
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate 13,493 5,165
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 10,293 10,101
Limited partners (123 interests) 922,140 903,134
---------- ----------
932,433 913,235
---------- ----------
$ 945,926 $ 918,400
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 146,955 $ 146,532 $ 306,293 $ 286,086
Interest 1,010 969 2,113 1,923
-------- -------- -------- --------
147,965 147,501 308,406 288,009
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 76,829 81,136 142,278 153,874
General and administrative 2,939 2,931 6,126 5,722
Depletion 15,475 12,203 28,133 26,991
-------- -------- -------- --------
95,243 96,270 176,537 186,587
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 52,722 $ 51,231 $ 131,869 $ 101,422
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 528 $ 512 $ 1,319 $ 1,014
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 52,194 $ 50,719 $ 130,550 $ 100,408
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 424.34 $ 412.35 $1,061.38 $ 816.33
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 10,101 $ 903,134 $ 913,235
Distributions (1,127) (111,544) (112,671)
Net income 1,319 130,550 131,869
-------- -------- --------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 10,293 $ 922,140 $ 932,433
======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 131,869 $ 101,422
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 28,133 26,991
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 21,996 (21,426)
Accounts payable 8,328 7,596
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 190,326 114,583
-------- --------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,380) (7,913)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (112,671) (116,412)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 76,275 (9,742)
Cash at beginning of period 57,176 72,318
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 133,451 $ 62,576
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited
partnership organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 7% to $306,293 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $286,086 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a decrease in production and lower average prices received
6
for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 6,328 barrels of oil, 2,454
barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 17,822 mcf of gas were sold, or
11,752 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 7,225 barrels of oil, 3,568 barrels of NGLs and 16,606 mcf of gas were
sold, or 13,561 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased slightly from $27.85 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.77 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.93, or 22%, from $13.35
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.28 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 127% from $2.24 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.09 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $176,537 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $186,587 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $10,050,
or 5%. This decrease was due to lower production costs, offset by increases in
general and administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $142,278 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$153,874 for the same period in 2000, resulting in an $11,596, or 8%, decrease.
The decrease was primarily due to less workover costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
7%, from $5,722 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $6,126 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $28,133 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$26,991 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,142, or 4%. This increase
was the result of a decline in proved reserves during the period ended June 30,
2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of 897
barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in
2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased slightly to $146,955 for the
three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $146,532 for the same period in
2000. The slight increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received for gas and NGLs, offset by a decline in production and a lower average
7
price received for oil. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 3,199 barrels
of oil, 1,420 barrels of NGLs and 8,870 mcf of gas were sold, or 6,097 BOEs. For
the three months ended June 30, 2000, 3,505 barrels of oil, 1,866 barrels of
NGLs and 8,672 mcf of gas were sold, or 6,816 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $1.16, or 4%, from $28.16
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.00 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.43, or
11%, from $13.37 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.80 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 69% to
$4.46 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.64 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $95,243 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $96,270 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$1,027, or 1%. This decrease was due to lower production costs, offset by an
increase in G&A and depletion.
Production costs were $76,829 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$81,136 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $4,307 decrease, or 5%. The
decrease was primarily due to less workover costs.
During this period, G&A increased slightly from $2,931 for the three months
ended June 30, 2000 to $2,939 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a
higher allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited
to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $15,475 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$12,203 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $3,272, or 27%. This
increase was attributable to a decline in proved reserves during the period
ended June 30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices, offset by a decline
in oil production of 306 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $75,743 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $20,397 and a
reduction in working capital of $44,154 and a decline of $11,596 in production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A expenses of $404. The increase in oil and
gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which
contributed an additional $57,068 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $36,671
resulting from the decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000. The decrease in production costs was primarily due to less
workover costs. The increase in G&A was due to an increase in audit and tax
fees.
8
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were related to expenditures for equipment upgrades on
various oil and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$112,671, of which $1,127 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$111,544 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $116,412, of which $1,164 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $115,248 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
9
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86,
Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations,
partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 86, Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 57,176 $ 72,318
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 90,053 49,878
------------- -------------
Total current assets 147,229 122,196
------------- -------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on
the successful efforts accounting method 4,032,771 4,022,126
Accumulated depletion (3,261,600) (3,212,495)
------------- -------------
Net oil and gas properties 771,171 809,631
------------- -------------
$ 918,400 $ 931,827
============== ==============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 5,165 $ 10,250
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 10,101 10,184
Limited partners (123 interests) 903,134 911,393
------------- -------------
913,235 921,577
------------- -------------
$ 918,400 $ 931,827
============== ==============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 611,774 $ 354,462 $ 301,556
Interest 4,927 2,697 3,224
--------- --------- ----------
616,701 357,159 304,780
--------- --------- ----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 287,563 236,129 213,042
General and administrative 12,235 7,089 6,031
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 98,274
Depletion 49,103 65,740 151,842
--------- --------- ----------
348,901 308,958 469,189
--------- --------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 267,800 $ 48,201 $ (164,409)
========= ========= ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 2,678 $ 482 $ (1,644)
========= ========= ==========
Limited partners $ 265,122 $ 47,719 $ (162,765)
========= ========= ==========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $2,155.46 $ 387.96 $(1,323.29)
========= ========= ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
------------- -------------- ---------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 13,138 $ 1,203,846 $ 1,216,984
Distributions (1,107) (109,619) (110,726)
Net loss (1,644) (162,765) (164,409)
----------- ------------ -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 10,387 931,462 941,849
Distributions (685) (67,788) (68,473)
Net income 482 47,719 48,201
----------- ------------ -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 10,184 911,393 921,577
Distributions (2,761) (273,381) (276,142)
Net income 2,678 265,122 267,800
----------- ------------ -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 10,101 $ 903,134 $ 913,235
============ ============= ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 267,800 $ 48,201 $ (164,409)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 98,274
Depletion 49,103 65,740 151,842
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (40,175) (18,067) 21,645
Accounts payable (5,085) 5,541 (8,987)
---------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 271,643 101,415 98,365
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (10,643) (7,363) (9,842)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 701 -
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash used in investing activities (10,643) (6,662) (9,842)
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (276,142) (68,473) (110,726)
----------- ----------- ------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (15,142) 26,280 (22,203)
Cash at beginning of year 72,318 46,038 68,241
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash at end of year $ 57,176 $ 72,318 $ 46,038
============ ============ =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 86, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1986 under the laws of the State of Texas. The
Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $98,274 related to its
proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $209,861 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 267,800 $ 48,201 $ (164,409)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax reporting
less than amounts for financial reporting purposes 43,051 60,686 147,947
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 98,274
Other, net (688) (98) 931
----------- ------------ -----------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 310,163 $ 108,789 $ 82,743
============ ============ ============
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Development costs $ 10,643 $ 7,363 $ 9,842
============ ============ ============
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 176,667 $ 176,667
Completed wells and equipment 3,856,104 3,845,459
------------ ------------
4,032,771 4,022,126
Accumulated depletion (3,261,600) (3,212,495)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 771,171 $ 809,631
============= =============
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 113,494 $ 109,568 $ 108,785
Reimbursement of general and administrative expenses $ 10,107 $ 3,583 $ 4,004
9
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA
and the Partnership are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
--------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
-------------------- -------------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 268,312 360,572
Revisions (79,340) (72,226)
Production (22,245) (33,219)
------------- ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 166,727 255,127
Revisions 157,207 248,047
Production (20,843) (30,923)
------------- ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 303,091 472,251
Revisions 35,219 57,281
Production (20,938) (33,570)
------------- ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 317,372 495,962
============= ============
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.44 per barrel of NGLs and $7.89 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $2,493,000 and undiscounted $4,970,000.
10
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 10,955 $ 7,464 $ 1,802
Future production costs (5,985) (4,360) (1,436)
------------- ------------ -------------
4,970 3,104 366
10% annual discount factor (2,477) (1,468) (105)
------------- ------------ -------------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 2,493 $ 1,636 $ 261
============== ============= ==============
11
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (324) $ (118) $ (89)
Net changes in prices and production costs 864 922 (654)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 293 1,155 (93)
Accretion of discount 164 26 102
Changes in production rates, timing and other (140) (610) (25)
------------- ------------ ------------
Change in present value of future net revenues 857 1,375 (759)
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, beginning of year 1,636 261 1,020
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, end of year $ 2,493 $ 1,636 $ 261
============== ============= =============
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil and
gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10% of
total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 45% 45% -
Mobil Oil Corporation 19% 18% 18%
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 46%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 5% 21%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
and Mobil Oil Corporation were $23,848 and $10,948, respectively, which are
included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the
accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing
general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all
production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$4,920,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of
initial Partnership capital less commission and organization and
offering costs
12
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement
to the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
(A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 73% to $611,774 for 2000 as
compared to $354,462 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and an increase in production. In 2000, 13,860 barrels
of oil, 7,078 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 33,570 mcf of gas were
sold, or 26,533 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 13,331 barrels of
oil, 7,512 barrels of NGLs and 30,923 mcf of gas were sold, or 25,997 BOEs. Due
to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas properties,
management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the future until
the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.11, or 70%, from
$17.34 in 1999 to $29.45 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.74, or 62%, from $9.27 in 1999 to $15.01 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 68% from $1.73 in 1999 to $2.90 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $348,901 as compared to $308,958
in 1999, an increase of $39,943, or 13%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $287,563 in 2000 and $236,129 in 1999, resulting in a
$51,434 increase, or 22%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
73% from $7,089 in 1999 to $12,235 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 2% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $10,107 in 2000 and $3,583 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $49,103 in 2000 as compared to $65,740 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $16,637, or 25%. This decrease was primarily due to a 34,384 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 18% to $354,462 from
$301,556 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 13,331 barrels of oil,
7,512 barrels of NGLs and 30,923 mcf of gas were sold, or 25,997 BOEs. In 1998,
14,914 barrels of oil, 7,331 barrels of NGLs and 33,219 mcf of gas were sold, or
27,782 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $4.00, or 30%, from
$13.34 in 1998 to $17.34 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.58, or 39%, from $6.69 in 1998 to $9.27 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 7% from $1.61 in 1998 to $1.73 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $308,958 as compared to $469,189
in 1998, a decrease of $160,231, or 34%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties and depletion, offset by
increases in production costs and G&A.
Production costs were $236,129 in 1999 and $213,042 in 1998, resulting in a
$23,087 increase, or 11%. The increase was due to increased workover costs and
well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production, offset by a
decrease in ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 18% from $6,031 in 1998 to $7,089 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 2% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $3,583 in
1999 and $4,004 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $98,274 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $65,740 in 1999 compared to $151,842 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $86,102, or 57%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 97,690 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of 1,583
barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in
1998.
Petroleum Industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $170,228 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $259,542, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $51,434, G&A expenses paid of $5,146 and working capital of $32,734. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $242,798 to oil and gas receipts and
an increase of $16,744 resulting from the increase in production during 2000.
The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 2%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions in 1999 of $701 were from equipment credits
received on two wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $276,142, of which $2,761 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $273,381 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $68,473, of which
$685 was distributed to the managing general partner and $67,788 to the limited
partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 86, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 306,293 $ 286,086 $ 611,774 $ 354,462 $ 301,556 $ 443,324 $ 531,378
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 98,274 $ 87,003 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 181,309
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 131,869 $ 101,422 $ 267,800 $ 48,201 $ (164,409) $ (1,482) $ 394,220
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,319 $ 1,014 $ 2,678 $ 482 $ (1,644) $ (15) $ 3,942
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 130,550 $ 100,408 $ 265,122 $ 47,719 $ (162,765) $ (1,467) $ 390,278
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 1,061.38 $ 816.33 $ 2,155.46 $ 387.96 $(1,323.29) $ (11.93) $ 3,172.99
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 906.86 $ 936.98 $ 2,222.61 $ 551.12 $ 891.21 $ 1,688.39 $ 3,519.32(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 945,926 $ 924,433 $ 918,400 $ 931,827 $ 946,558 $1,230,680 $1,439,437
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of
$1,474.06 in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
87-A Conv., Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated
October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 3,856
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 5,136
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding
Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 765
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 200.21
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.38 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 120.97
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 113.34
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 185.61
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 194.37
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 177
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its
partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2037, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 99,031 $ 42,044
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 47,720 58,386
---------- ----------
Total current assets 146,751 100,430
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 2,608,971 2,703,338
Accumulated depletion (2,278,301) (2,357,166)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 330,670 346,172
---------- ----------
$ 477,421 $ 446,602
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 6,256 $ 5,133
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 4,714 4,417
Limited partners (3,856 interests) 466,451 437,052
---------- ----------
471,165 441,469
---------- ----------
$ 477,421 $ 446,602
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- -----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 83,576 $ 94,529 $ 187,285 $ 181,312
Interest 729 952 1,458 1,645
Gain on disposition of assets 5,588 - 5,909 784
-------- -------- -------- ---------
89,893 95,481 194,652 183,741
-------- -------- -------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 36,798 35,010 74,815 70,536
General and administrative 2,508 2,836 5,619 5,439
Depletion 5,824 5,961 15,718 12,899
Abandoned property 3,134 - 3,134 -
-------- -------- -------- ---------
48,264 43,807 99,286 88,874
-------- -------- -------- ---------
Net income $ 41,629 $ 51,674 $ 95,366 $ 94,867
======== ======== ======== =========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 417 $ 517 $ 954 $ 949
======== ======== ======== =========
Limited partners $ 41,212 $ 51,157 $ 94,412 $ 93,918
======== ======== ======== =========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 10.68 $ 13.27 $ 24.48 $ 24.36
======== ======== ======== =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 4,417 $ 437,052 $ 441,469
Distributions (657) (65,013) (65,670)
Net income 954 94,412 95,366
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 4,714 $ 466,451 $ 471,165
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 95,366 $ 94,867
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 15,718 12,899
Gain on disposition of assets (5,909) (784)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 10,666 (17,100)
Accounts payable 4,259 3,710
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 120,100 93,592
-------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (531) (1,130)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 3,088 1,015
-------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 2,557 (115)
-------- --------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (65,670) (104,242)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 56,987 (10,765)
Cash at beginning of period 42,044 53,265
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 99,031 $ 42,500
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. (the "Partnership") was organized in 1987 as a
general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was converted to a
Texas limited partnership in 1989.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 3% to $187,285 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $181,312 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 3,828 barrels
6
of oil, 2,015 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 10,345 mcf of gas were
sold, or 7,567 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June
30, 2000, 4,349 barrels of oil, 2,563 barrels of NGLs and 11,375 mcf of gas were
sold, or 8,808 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased slightly from $27.41 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.45 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.10, or 14%, from $14.63
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.73 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 116% from $2.17 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.69 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $5,909 was received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 of which $5,123 was from disposal of equipment on two wells
plugged and abandoned during the current period and $786 was from equipment
credits received on one fully depleted well. Expenses to plug and abandon these
wells were $3,134. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, a gain of $784 was
recognized due to equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $99,286 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $88,874 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $10,412,
or 12%. This increase was due to increases in production costs, abandoned
property costs, depletion and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $74,815 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and $70,536
for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $4,279 increase, or 6%. The increase
was due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate
well production and higher production taxes due to higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
3% from $5,439 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5,619 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $15,718 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$12,899 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $2,819 or 22%. This increase
was due to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June 30, 2001
due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decrease in oil production of 521
barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in
2000.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 12% to $83,576 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $94,529 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and a lower
average price received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 1,918 barrels of oil, 993
barrels of NGLs and 4,627 mcf of gas were sold, or 3,682 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 2,163 barrels of oil, 1,381 barrels of NGLs and
5,950 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,536 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.58, or 2%, from $27.64
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.06 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.57, or
4%, from $14.21 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.78 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 44% to
$3.67 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.55 during the same
period in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $5,588 was received during the three months
ended June 30, 2001 of which $5,123 was from disposal of equipment on two wells
plugged and abandoned during the current period and $465 was from equipment
credits received on one fully depleted well. Expenses to plug and abandon these
wells were $3,134.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $48,264 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $43,807 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$4,457, or 10%. This increase was due to higher production costs and abandoned
property costs, offset by declines in G&A and depletion.
Production costs were $36,798 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$35,010 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $1,788 increase, or 5%. The
increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 12%, from $2,836 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $2,508 for the same period in 2001, due to a decrease in audit
and tax fees.
Depletion was $5,824 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$5,961 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $137, or 2%. This decrease was
attributable to a decrease in oil production of 245 barrels for the three months
ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
8
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $26,508 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $5,786 and a
reduction in working capital of $28,315, offset by increases in production costs
of $4,279, abandoned property costs of $3,134 and G&A expenses of $180. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2001 which contributed an additional $34,082 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $28,296 resulting from the decline in production during 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in production costs was
primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well
production and higher production taxes associated with increased oil and gas
prices. The increase in G&A was due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on various oil and
gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $3,088 and $1,015 received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, were comprised of $786 and
$784, respectively, received from the salvage of equipment on one fully depleted
well and $316 and $231, respectively, from equipment salvage on active
properties. A gain of $1,986 was recognized during the six months ended June 30,
2001 due to salvage income received on two wells plugged and abandoned.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$65,670, of which $657 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$65,013 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $104,242, of which $1,042 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $103,200 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
9
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv.,
Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 42,044 $ 53,265
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 58,386 34,510
----------- -----------
Total current assets 100,430 87,775
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 2,703,338 2,701,261
Accumulated depletion (2,357,166) (2,326,550)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 346,172 374,711
----------- -----------
$ 446,602 $ 462,486
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 5,133 $ 6,175
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 4,417 4,565
Limited partners (3,856 interests) 437,052 451,746
----------- -----------
441,469 456,311
----------- -----------
$ 446,602 $ 462,486
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 380,908 $ 234,259 $ 194,541
Interest 3,744 2,131 2,599
Gain on disposition of assets 857 1,184 102
--------- --------- ---------
385,509 237,574 197,242
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 150,075 126,927 143,008
General and administrative 11,235 6,978 5,727
Impairment of oil and gas properties 5,726 -- 63,814
Depletion 24,890 35,270 83,255
--------- --------- ---------
191,926 169,175 295,804
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 193,583 $ 68,399 $ (98,562)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 1,936 $ 684 $ (986)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 191,647 $ 67,715 $ (97,576)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 49.70 $ 17.56 $ (25.30)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 6,329 $ 626,350 $ 632,679
Distributions (761) (75,346) (76,107)
Net loss (986) (97,576) (98,562)
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 4,582 453,428 458,010
Distributions (701) (69,397) (70,098)
Net income 684 67,715 68,399
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 4,565 451,746 456,311
Distributions (2,084) (206,341) (208,425)
Net income 1,936 191,647 193,583
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 4,417 $ 437,052 $ 441,469
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 193,583 $ 68,399 $ (98,562)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 5,726 -- 63,814
Depletion 24,890 35,270 83,255
Gain on disposition of assets (857) (1,184) (102)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (23,876) (12,786) 17,191
Accounts payable (1,042) 1,263 (2,930)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 198,424 90,962 62,666
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (2,560) (5,634) (2,338)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 1,340 1,238 2,095
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (1,220) (4,396) (243)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (208,425) (70,098) (76,107)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (11,221) 16,468 (13,684)
Cash at beginning of year 53,265 36,797 50,481
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 42,044 $ 53,265 $ 36,797
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., Ltd. (the "Partnership") was organized in
1987 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Texas limited partnership in 1989. The Partnership's managing
general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
7
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future
8
cash flows at a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved in the
industry. As a result, the Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions
of $5,726 and $63,814 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000
and 1998, respectively.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $34,055 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 193,583 $ 68,399 $(98,562)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 21,481 31,994 77,835
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 5,726 -- 63,814
Salvage income -- -- 1,795
Other, net (320) (923) 1,074
-------- -------- --------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 220,470 $ 99,470 $ 45,956
======== ======== ========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- ---------
Development costs $ 2,560 $ 5,634 $ 2,338
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---- ----
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 126,683 $ 126,683
Completed wells and equipment 2,576,655 2,574,578
----------- -----------
2,703,338 2,701,261
Accumulated depletion (2,357,166) (2,326,550)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 346,172 $ 374,711
=========== ===========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 57,269 $ 58,965 $ 59,200
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 9,809 $ 4,592 $ 4,507
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. and the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties
to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
-------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 35 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd.
is 11.80396% and 88.19604%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 173,242 260,824
Revisions (70,303) (79,797)
Production (14,371) (24,025)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 88,568 157,002
Revisions 121,459 218,318
Production (13,578) (24,503)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 196,449 350,817
Revisions (1,562) (40,268)
Production (13,096) (20,355)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 181,791 290,194
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.38 per barrel of NGLs and $7.67 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $1,465,000 and undiscounted was $2,903,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
11
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 6,182 $ 4,834 $ 964
Future production costs (3,279) (2,837) (754)
------- ------- -------
2,903 1,997 210
10% annual discount factor (1,438) (931) (61)
------- ------- -------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 1,465 $ 1,066 $ 149
======= ======= =======
For the years ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (231) $ (107) $ (52)
Net changes in prices and production costs 663 480 (462)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (56) 878 (87)
Accretion of discount 106 15 71
Changes in production rates, timing and other (83) (349) (26)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 399 917 (556)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 1,066 149 705
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 1,465 $ 1,066 $ 149
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Plains Marketing, L.P. 43% 40% --
Phillips Petroleum Company 10% -- --
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. -- -- 54%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 7% 29%
NGTS LLC 8% -- --
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
and Phillips Petroleum Company were $16,353 and $3,196, respectively, which are
included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the
accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
12
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $3,856,000. Pioneer
USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership
capital less commission and organization and offering costs allocated to
the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs
and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the
extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
(A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 63% to $380,908 for 2000 as
compared to $234,259 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decrease in production. In 2000, 8,407
barrels of oil, 4,689 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 20,355 mcf of
gas were sold, or 16,489 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 8,263
barrels of oil, 5,315 barrels of NGLs and 24,503 mcf of gas were sold, or 17,662
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.40, or 73%, from
$17.06 in 1999 to $29.46 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.20, or 63%, from $9.81 in 1999 to $16.01 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 70% from $1.68 in 1999 to $2.86 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $191,926 as compared to $169,175
in 1999, an increase of $22,751, or 13%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs, impairment of oil and gas properties and general
and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Gains on disposition of assets of $857 and $1,184 were due to equipment credits
received on one well during 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Production costs were $150,075 in 2000 and $126,927 in 1999, resulting in a
$23,148 increase, or 18%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional workover and well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
61% from $6,978 in 1999 to $11,235 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $9,809 in 2000 and $4,592 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $5,726 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $24,890 in 2000 as compared to $35,270 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $10,380, or 29%. This decrease was primarily due to an 8,116 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 20% to $234,259 from
$194,541 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decrease in production. In 1999, 8,263 barrels of oil,
5,315 barrels of NGLs and 24,503 mcf of gas were sold, or 17,662 BOEs. In 1998,
9,354 barrels of oil, 5,017 barrels of NGLs and 24,025 mcf of gas were sold, or
18,375 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.84, or 29%, from
$13.22 in 1998 to $17.06 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.05, or 45%, from $6.76 in 1998 to $9.81 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 9% from $1.54 in 1998 to $1.68 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $169,175 as compared to $295,804
in 1998, a decrease of $126,629, or 43%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $126,927 in 1999 and $143,008 in 1998, resulting in a
$16,081 decrease, or 11%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs, workover expenses and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in
production taxes due to increased oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 22% from $5,727 in 1998 to $6,978 in 1999
primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $4,592 in
1999 and $4,507 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $63,814 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $35,270 in 1999 compared to $83,255 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $47,985, or 58%. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in
proved reserves of 71,246 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and
a decline in oil production of 1,091 barrels for the period ended December 31,
1999 compared to the same period in 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $107,462 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $148,262, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $23,148, G&A expenses paid of $4,257 and working capital of $13,395. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $165,908 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $17,646 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and workover and well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily
due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated
(limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas
revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to
upgrades of equipment on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $1,340 and $1,238 received during 2000 and
1999, respectively, were primarily due to equipment credits received on active
properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $208,425, of which $2,084 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $206,341 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $70,098, of which
$701 was distributed to the managing general partner and $69,397 to the limited
partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A CONV., LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 187,285 $ 181,312 $ 380,908 $ 234,259 $ 194,541 $ 298,836 $ 351,679
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 5,726 $ -- $ 63,814 $ 98,114 $ 46,639
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 113,535
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 95,366 $ 94,867 $ 193,583 $ 68,399 $ (98,562) $ (7,019) $ 241,359
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 954 $ 949 $ 1,936 $ 684 $ (986) $ (70) $ 2,413
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 94,412 $ 93,918 $ 191,647 $ 67,715 $ (97,576) $ (6,949) $ 238,946
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 24.48 $ 24.36 $ 49.70 $ 17.56 $ (25.30) $ (1.80) $ 61.97
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 16.86 $ 26.76 $ 53.51 $ 18.00 $ 19.54 $ 42.51 $ 89.89(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 477,421 $ 456,821 $ 446,602 $ 462,486 $ 462,922 $ 640,521 $ 825,116
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $29.44
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
87-A, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 87-A, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 28,811
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 38,379
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding
Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 5,714
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 199.53
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.38 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 121.20
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 113.60
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 184.94
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 193.72
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 177
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its
partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001
by the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2037, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-12244-01
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-2185148
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................. 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................. 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000............................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements.......................... 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................. 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K....................... 11
Signatures............................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 746,861 $ 321,340
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 355,540 435,508
----------- -----------
Total current assets 1,102,401 756,848
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 19,493,557 20,198,629
Accumulated depletion (17,022,826) (17,611,694)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 2,470,731 2,586,935
----------- -----------
$ 3,573,132 $ 3,343,783
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 45,917 $ 37,865
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 35,245 33,032
Limited partners (28,811 interests) 3,491,970 3,272,886
----------- -----------
3,527,215 3,305,918
----------- -----------
$ 3,573,132 $ 3,343,783
=========== ===========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
------------------------ ------------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 624,236 $ 708,134 $1,399,068 $1,357,075
Interest 5,550 7,074 11,014 12,302
Gain on disposition of assets 41,754 - 44,153 5,861
--------- --------- --------- ---------
671,540 715,208 1,454,235 1,375,238
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 274,936 261,610 559,015 527,318
General and administrative 18,727 20,848 41,972 40,316
Depletion 43,530 44,465 117,815 96,209
Abandoned property 23,416 - 23,416 -
--------- --------- --------- ---------
360,609 326,923 742,218 663,843
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income $ 310,931 $ 388,285 $ 712,017 $ 711,395
========= ========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 3,109 $ 3,883 $ 7,120 $ 7,114
========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 307,822 $ 384,402 $ 704,897 $ 704,281
========= ========= ========= =========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 10.69 $ 13.34 $ 24.47 $ 24.44
========= ========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- -----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 33,032 $3,272,886 $ 3,305,918
Distributions (4,907) (485,813) (490,720)
Net income 7,120 704,897 712,017
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 35,245 $3,491,970 $ 3,527,215
======== ========= ==========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 712,017 $ 711,395
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 117,815 96,209
Gain on disposition of assets (44,153) (5,861)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 79,968 (62,891)
Accounts payable 31,488 26,863
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 897,135 765,715
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (3,969) (8,446)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 23,075 7,591
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 19,106 (855)
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (490,720) (778,868)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 425,521 (14,008)
Cash at beginning of period 321,340 339,531
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 746,861 $ 325,523
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 3% to $1,399,068 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $1,357,075 for the same period in
2000. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received,
offset by a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001,
28,595 barrels of oil, 15,052 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 77,315
7
mcf of gas were sold, or 56,533 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six
months ended June 30, 2000, 32,573 barrels of oil, 19,149 barrels of NGLs and
84,978 mcf of gas were sold, or 65,885 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased slightly from $27.41 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.45 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.10, or 14%, from $14.63
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.73 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 116% from $2.17 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.69 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $44,153 was received during the six months
ended June 30, 2001 of which $38,277 was from disposal of equipment on two wells
plugged and abandoned during the current period and $5,876 was from equipment
credits received on one fully depleted well. Expenses to plug and abandon these
wells were $23,416. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, a gain of $5,861 was
recognized due to equipment credits received on a fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $742,218 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $663,843 for the same period ended June 30, 2000, an
increase of $78,375, or 12%. This increase was due to increases in production
costs, abandoned property costs, depletion and general and administrative
expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $559,015 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$527,318 for the same period in 2000 resulting in an increase of $31,697, or 6%.
The increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production and higher production taxes associated
with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
4% from $40,316 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $41,972 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $117,815 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$96,209 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $21,606, or 22%. This
increase was due to a decline in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of
3,978 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
8
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 12% to $624,236 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $708,134 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and a lower
average price received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 14,328 barrels of oil, 7,417
barrels of NGLs and 34,560 mcf of gas were sold, or 27,505 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 16,239 barrels of oil, 10,298 barrels of NGLs and
44,352 mcf of gas were sold, or 33,929 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.58, or 2%, from $27.64
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.06 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.57, or 4%, from $14.21
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.78 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 44% from $2.55 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.67 for the same period in 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $41,754 was received during the three months
ended June 30, 2001 of which $38,277 was from disposal of equipment on two wells
plugged and abandoned during the current period and $3,477 was from equipment
credits received on one fully depleted well. Expenses to plug and abandon these
wells were $23,416.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $360,609 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $326,923 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$33,686, or 10%. This increase was due to increases in abandoned property costs
and production costs, offset by declines in G&A and depletion.
Production costs were $274,936 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$261,610 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $13,326 increase, or 5%. The
increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 10% from $20,848 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $18,727 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a
decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $43,530 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$44,465 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $935, or 2%. This decrease
was primarily due to a decline in oil production of 1,911 barrels for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
9
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $131,420 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was primarily due to an increase of $40,705 in oil and gas sales
receipts and a reduction in working capital of $147,484, offset by increases in
production costs of $31,697, G&A expenses of $1,656 and abandoned property costs
of $23,416. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in
commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an additional $254,340 to oil and
gas receipts, offset by $213,635 resulting from the decline in production during
2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in production costs
was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production and higher production taxes associated with higher oil
and gas prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due to an increase in audit
and tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were related to the upgrades of oil and gas equipment on
active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $23,075 and $7,591 were received during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Proceeds recognized
during the period in 2001 were related to $14,840 from salvage income received
on two wells plugged and abandoned and $8,235 from equipment credits received on
a fully depleted well. Proceeds recognized during the period in 2000 were from
equipment credits received on fully depleted properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$490,720, of which $4,907 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$485,813 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $778,868, of which $7,789 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $771,079 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
10
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 8, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
-------------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-12244-01
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-2185148
------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$28,636,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 28,811.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 28,811 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers. Of the Partnership's total oil and
gas revenues for 2000, approximately 43% and 11% was attributable to sales made
to Plains Marketing, L.P. and NGTS LLC, respectively. Pioneer USA is of the
opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not have an adverse effect on
its ability to sell its oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 96
oil and gas wells. Two wells were dry holes. Six uneconomical wells were plugged
and abandoned and 15 oil and gas wells have been sold. At December 31, 2000, 73
wells were producing.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 28,811 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 2,148 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $1,541,726 and
$518,518, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------------- ------------ ----------- ------------ -----------
Operating results:
------------------
Oil and gas sales $ 2,845,556 $ 1,750,425 $ 1,453,492 $ 2,232,898 $ 2,627,636
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 848,304
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ 42,807 $ - $ 477,501 $ 732,890 $ 348,546
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Net income (loss) $ 1,444,249 $ 511,237 $ (736,103) $ (49,528) $ 1,803,894
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 14,442 $ 5,112 $ (7,361) $ (495) $ 18,039
=========== =========== ============ ============ ===========
Limited partners $ 1,429,807 $ 506,125 $ (728,742) $ (49,033) $ 1,785,855
=========== =========== ============ ============ ===========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 49.63 $ 17.57 $ (25.29) $ (1.70) $ 61.99
=========== =========== ============ ============ ============
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 53.51 $ 18.00 $ 19.54 $ 42.52 $ 89.89(a)
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
At year end:
------------
Identifiable assets $ 3,343,783 $ 3,464,619 $ 3,466,459 $ 4,793,102 $ 6,171,831
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $29.15
in 1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 63% to $2,845,556 for 2000 as
compared to $1,750,425 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decrease in production. In 2000, 62,796
barrels of oil, 35,028 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 152,075 mcf
of gas were sold, or 123,170 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 61,734
barrels of oil, 39,707 barrels of NGLs and 183,099 mcf of gas were sold, or
131,958 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in
the future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.40, or 73%, from
$17.06 in 1999 to $29.46 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.20, or 63%, from $9.81 in 1999 to $16.01 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 70% from $1.68 in 1999 to $2.86 in 2000. The
market price received for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past
decade and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gains on disposition of assets of $6,407 and $8,848 were due to equipment
credits received on one well during 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $1,435,888 compared to $1,264,233
in 1999, an increase of $171,655, or 14%. The increase resulted from increases
in production costs, the impairment of oil and gas properties and general and
administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $1,121,487 in 2000 and $948,362 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $173,125, or 18%. This increase was primarily due to higher
production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well
maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
63% from $52,563 in 1999 to $85,559 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $73,296 in 2000 and $34,349 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $42,807 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $186,035 in 2000 as compared to $263,308 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $77,273, or 29%. This decrease was primarily due to a 45,228 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 20% to $1,750,425 from
$1,453,492 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decrease in production. In 1999, 61,734 barrels of oil,
39,707 barrels of NGLs and 183,099 mcf of gas were sold, or 131,958 BOEs. In
1998, 69,905 barrels of oil, 37,470 barrels of NGLs and 179,494 mcf of gas were
sold, or 137,291 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.84, or 29%, from
$13.22 in 1998 to $17.06 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.05, or 45%, from $6.76 in 1998 to $9.81 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 9% from $1.54 in 1998 to $1.68 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $8,848 was recognized during 1999 from
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well. During 1998, a gain on
disposition of assets of $765 was received from the sale of equipment on one
saltwater disposal well plugged and abandoned in a prior year.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $1,264,233 compared to $2,210,330
in 1998, a decrease of $946,097, or 43%. The decrease resulted from declines in
the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset
by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $948,362 in 1999 and $1,068,450 in 1998, resulting in a
$120,088 decrease, or 11%. This decrease was primarily attributable to
reductions in well maintenance costs, workover expenses and ad valorem taxes,
offset by an increase in production taxes due to increased in oil and gas
revenues.
During this period, G&A increased, in aggregate, 23% from $42,787 in 1998 to
$52,563 in 1999 primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing
general partner $34,349 in 1999 and $33,674 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf
of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $477,501 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1998.
6
Depletion was $263,308 in 1999 compared to $621,592 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $358,284, or 58%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 532,499 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of 8,171
barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in
1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $934,385 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $1,107,108 and a decline in working capital of
$33,398, offset by increases in production costs paid of $173,125 and G&A
expenses paid of $32,996. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the
increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an additional
$1,239,482 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $132,374 resulting from the
decline in production during 2000. The increase in production costs was
primarily due to increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas
prices and additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate
well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of
the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to the
upgrades of oil and gas equipment on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $10,011 and $9,249 received during 2000 and
1999, respectively, were from equipment credits on one well in each year.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
7
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $1,557,299, of which $15,573
was distributed to the managing general partner and $1,541,726 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $523,756, of which
$5,238 was distributed to the managing general partner and $518,518 to the
limited partners.
8
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 14
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 15
9
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---- ----
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 321,340 $ 339,531
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 435,508 324,832
---------- ----------
Total current assets 756,848 664,363
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 20,198,629 20,183,108
Accumulated depletion (17,611,694) (17,382,852)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 2,586,935 2,800,256
---------- -----------
$ 3,343,783 $ 3,464,619
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 37,865 $ 45,651
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 33,032 34,163
Limited partners (28,811 interests) 3,272,886 3,384,805
---------- ---------
3,305,918 3,418,968
----------- ----------
$ 3,343,783 $ 3,464,619
=========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------------ ---------- ------------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 2,845,556 $ 1,750,425 $ 1,453,492
Interest 28,174 16,197 19,970
Gain on disposition of assets 6,407 8,848 765
----------- ----------- -----------
2,880,137 1,775,470 1,474,227
----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 1,121,487 948,362 1,068,450
General and administrative 85,559 52,563 42,787
Impairment of oil and gas properties 42,807 -- 477,501
Depletion 186,035 263,308 621,592
----------- ----------- -----------
1,435,888 1,264,233 2,210,330
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 1,444,249 $ 511,237 $ (736,103)
=========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 14,442 $ 5,112 $ (7,361)
=========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 1,429,807 $ 506,125 $ (728,742)
=========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 49.63 $ 17.57 $ (25.29)
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 47,336 $ 4,688,910 $ 4,736,246
Distributions (5,686) (562,970) (568,656)
Net loss (7,361) (728,742) (736,103)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 34,289 3,397,198 3,431,487
Distributions (5,238) (518,518) (523,756)
Net income 5,112 506,125 511,237
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 34,163 3,384,805 3,418,968
Distributions (15,573) (1,541,726) (1,557,299)
Net income 14,442 1,429,807 1,444,249
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 33,032 $ 3,272,886 $ 3,305,918
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------------ ----------- -----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 1,444,249 $ 511,237 $ (736,103)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 42,807 -- 477,501
Depletion 186,035 263,308 621,592
Gain on disposition of assets (6,407) (8,848) (765)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (110,676) (162,539) 128,574
Accounts payable (7,786) 10,679 (21,884)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,548,222 613,837 468,915
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (19,125) (42,098) (17,466)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 10,011 9,249 15,652
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities (9,114) (32,849) (1,814)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (1,557,299) (523,756) (568,656)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (18,191) 57,232 (101,555)
Cash at beginning of year 339,531 282,299 383,854
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash at end of year $ 321,340 $ 339,531 $ 282,299
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 87-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
15
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $42,807 and $477,501
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000 and 1998, respectively.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $254,091 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
16
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 1,444,249 $ 511,237 $ (736,103)
Intangible development costs capitalized for
financial reporting purposes and expensed
for tax reporting purposes -- -- (6)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amount for
financial reporting purposes 162,602 238,819 584,799
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 42,807 -- 477,501
Salvage income 1,288 -- 13,408
Other, net (3,728) (5,120) 6,254
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 1,647,218 $ 744,936 $ 345,853
=========== =========== ===========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- -------- ---------
Development costs $ 19,125 $ 42,098 $ 17,466
======== ======== =========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 946,545 $ 946,545
Completed wells and equipment 19,252,084 19,236,563
----------- -----------
20,198,629 20,183,108
Accumulated depletion (17,611,694) (17,382,852)
------------ -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 2,586,935 $ 2,800,256
=========== ===========
17
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 428,017 $ 440,563 $ 442,313
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 73,296 $ 34,349 $ 33,674
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. In addition,
Pioneer USA, Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv., L.P. and the Partnership (the
"Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer
USA (1) Partnerships(2)
---------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 175 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 87-A Conv.,
L.P. is 88.19604% and 11.80396%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
18
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 1,294,911 1,949,548
Revisions (525,530) (596,528)
Production (107,375) (179,494)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 662,006 1,173,526
Revisions 907,814 1,631,783
Production (101,441) (183,099)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 1,468,379 2,622,210
Revisions (35,573) (336,529)
Production (97,824) (152,075)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 1,334,982 2,133,606
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.83 per barrel of NGLs and $7.67 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $10,856,000 and undiscounted was
$21,368,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 45,412 $ 36,134 $ 7,206
Future production costs (24,044) (21,211) (5,635)
-------- -------- --------
21,368 14,923 1,571
10% annual discount factor (10,512) (6,959) (455)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 10,856 $ 7,964 $ 1,116
======== ======== ========
19
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- ---------- ---------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (1,724) $ (802) $ (385)
Net changes in prices and production costs 4,989 3,587 (3,456)
Revisions of estimated future development costs - - -
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (618) 6,565 (652)
Accretion of discount 796 111 527
Changes in production rates, timing and other (551) (2,613) (189)
-------- ---------- ---------
Change in present value of future net revenues 2,892 6,848 (4,155)
-------- ---------- ---------
Balance, beginning of year 7,964 1,116 5,271
-------- ---------- ---------
Balance, end of year $ 10,856 $ 7,964 $ 1,116
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 43% 39% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 54%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 7% 29%
NGTS LLC 11% 9% 1%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
and NGTS LLC were $122,179 and $4,335, respectively, which is included in the
caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the accompanying Balance
Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The general partner of the Partnership is
Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA, the managing general partner, has the power
and authority to manage, control and administer all Program and
Partnership affairs. As managing general partner and operator of the
Partnership's properties, all production expenses are incurred by
Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The majority of the
Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly by the
Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is initially
received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership. Under
the limited partnership agreement,
20
the managing general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the
Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$28,811,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1%
of initial Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement
to the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
21
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
22
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA, Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
23
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 25% of its operating and general
and administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated approximately
25% of the Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 175 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
24
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 428,017 $ 440,563 $ 442,313
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 73,296 $ 34,349 $ 33,674
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
25
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules.
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
Dated: March 29, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 29, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
4(a) Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parker -
& Parsley 87-A, Ltd. incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-16910) (hereinafter
called the Partnership's Registration Statement
4(b) Form of Subscription Agreement and Power -
of Attorney incorporated by reference to
Exhibit D of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
D of the Partnership's Registration Statement
10(b) Development Program Agreement incorporated -
by reference to Exhibit C of the Partnership's
Registration Statement
28
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-A, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $1,399,068 $1,357,075 $2,845,556 $1,750,425 $1,453,492 $2,232,898 $2,627,636
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 848,304
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ 42,807 $ -- $ 477,501 $ 732,890 $ 348,546
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 712,017 $ 711,395 $1,444,249 $ 511,237 $ (736,103) $ (49,528) $1,803,894
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 7,120 $ 7,114 $ 14,442 $ 5,112 $ (7,361) $ (495) $ 18,039
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 704,897 $ 704,281 $1,429,807 $ 506,125 $ (728,742) $ (49,033) $1,785,855
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 24.47 $ 24.44 $ 49.63 $ 17.57 $ (25.29) $ (1.70) $ 61.99
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 16.86 $ 26.76 $ 53.51 $ 18.00 $ 19.54 $ 42.52 $ 89.89(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $3,573,132 $3,424,009 $3,343,783 $3,464,619 $3,466,459 $4,793,102 $6,171,831
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $29.15
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, CONV., LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
87-B Conv., Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated
October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 4,919
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 6,156
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 1,020
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 207.73
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for 3.68 times
the past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 138.24
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 138.95
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 193.19
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 201.72
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 173
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the partnership.
Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved by the
limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP
of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as to matters
of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on behalf of the
limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an approval of
that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is attached as
an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2037, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 124,834 $ 62,552
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 49,441 87,620
---------- ----------
Total current assets 174,275 150,172
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 3,151,486 3,280,150
Accumulated depletion (2,631,053) (2,733,516)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 520,433 546,634
---------- ----------
$ 694,708 $ 696,806
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 7,867 $ 6,423
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 6,854 6,889
Limited partners (4,919 interests) 679,987 683,494
---------- ----------
686,841 690,383
---------- ----------
$ 694,708 $ 696,806
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 93,434 $ 101,370 $ 202,782 $ 212,568
Interest 964 1,277 2,113 2,159
Gain on disposition of assets 1,426 - 5,439 919
-------- -------- -------- --------
95,824 102,647 210,334 215,646
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 44,523 44,599 91,336 84,466
General and administrative 2,429 2,971 5,272 6,307
Depletion 9,737 8,786 27,896 18,236
Abandoned property 830 - 4,243 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
57,519 56,356 128,747 109,009
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 38,305 $ 46,291 $ 81,587 $ 106,637
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 383 $ 463 $ 816 $ 1,066
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 37,922 $ 45,828 $ 80,771 $ 105,571
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 7.71 $ 9.31 $ 16.42 $ 21.46
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- -----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 6,889 $ 683,494 $ 690,383
Distributions (851) (84,278) (85,129)
Net income 816 80,771 81,587
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 6,854 $ 679,987 $ 686,841
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 81,587 $ 106,637
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 27,896 18,236
Gain on disposition of assets (5,439) (919)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 38,179 (19,394)
Accounts payable 4,421 4,658
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 146,644 109,218
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,695) (791)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 2,462 919
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities 767 128
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (85,129) (112,519)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 62,282 (3,173)
Cash at beginning of period 62,552 71,344
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 124,834 $ 68,171
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. (the "Partnership") was organized in 1987 as a
general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was converted to a
Texas limited partnership in 1989.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Results of Operations
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 5% to $202,782 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $212,568 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and a lower
6
average price received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 4,828 barrels of oil, 1,562
barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 8,728 mcf of gas were sold, or 7,845
barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30, 2000,
5,308 barrels of oil, 2,838 barrels of NGLs and 11,701 mcf of gas were sold, or
10,096 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.16, or 1%, from $27.30
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.14 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.21, or 15%, from
$15.08 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.29 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 141% from $2.13
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.13 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $5,439 was received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 from disposal of equipment on two wells plugged and abandoned
during the current period. Expenses to plug and abandon these wells were $4,243.
For the six months ended June 30, 2000 a gain on disposition of assets of $919
was recognized due to credits received from the disposal of oil and gas
equipment on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $128,747 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $109,009 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$19,738, or 18%. This increase was due to increases in depletion, production
costs and abandoned property costs, offset by a decrease in general and
administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $91,336 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and $84,466
for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $6,870 increase, or 8%. The increase
was due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate
well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
16% from $6,307 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5,272 for the same
period in 2001, due to a lower G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) due to lower oil revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000.
Depletion was $27,896 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$18,236 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $9,660, or 53%. This
increase was due to a downward revision to proved reserves on one significant
well, offset by a decline in oil production of 480 barrels for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 8% to $93,434 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $101,370 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
a decrease in production, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 2,390 barrels of oil, 858
barrels of NGLs and 4,278 mcf of gas were sold, or 3,961 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 2,515 barrels of oil, 1,351 barrels of NGLs and
5,264 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,743 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased slightly from $26.86 for
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.73 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.42, or 3%, from $14.98
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.40 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 47% to $3.82 during
the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.59 during the same period in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $1,426 was received during the three months
ended June 30, 2001 from disposal of equipment on two wells plugged and
abandoned during the current period. Expenses to plug and abandon these wells
were $830.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $57,519 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $56,356 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$1,163, or 2%. This increase was due to increases in depletion and abandoned
property costs, offset by a decrease in G&A and production costs.
Production costs were $44,523 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$44,599 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $76 decrease. The decrease
was due to lower well maintenance costs, offset by an increase in workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 18%, from $2,971 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $2,429 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of
decreased oil and gas revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000 and a decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $9,737 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$8,786 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $951, or 11%. This increase
was primarily due to a downward revision to proved reserves on one significant
well, offset by a decline in oil production of 125 barrels for the three months
ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
8
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $37,426 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to reductions of $57,336 in working capital and $1,035 in G&A
expenses, offset by a decline in oil and gas sales receipts of $9,832 and
increases in production costs of $6,870 and abandoned property costs of $4,243.
The decline in G&A was primarily due to less G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) due to lower oil and gas revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The decrease in oil
and gas receipts resulted from a decline of $50,340 in production during 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000 and a decline in oil prices of $879, offset
by an increase in gas and NGL prices of $41,387 during 2001. The increase in
production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 were related to equipment upgrades on various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $2,462 and $919 were recognized during
the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The proceeds
recognized during the period in 2001 were from salvage income received on two
wells plugged and abandoned during the current period. The proceeds recognized
during the period in 2000 were primarily from equipment credits received on one
fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$85,129, of which $851 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$84,278 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $112,519, of which $1,125 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $111,394 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
9
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv.,
Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---- ----
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 62,552 $ 71,344
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 87,620 36,226
----------- -----------
Total current assets 150,172 107,570
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 3,280,150 3,277,595
Accumulated depletion (2,733,516) (2,675,751)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 546,634 601,844
----------- -----------
$ 696,806 $ 709,414
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 6,423 $ 7,274
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 6,889 7,006
Limited partners (4,919 interests) 683,494 695,134
----------- -----------
690,383 702,140
----------- -----------
$ 696,806 $ 709,414
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 469,502 $ 278,326 $ 236,434
Interest 5,144 3,117 3,558
Gain on disposition of assets 1,005 -- 3,419
--------- --------- ---------
475,651 281,443 243,411
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 172,228 155,029 146,967
General and administrative 13,873 8,214 7,093
Impairment of oil and gas properties 21,231 -- 48,745
Depletion 36,534 49,790 120,823
Abandoned property -- -- 965
--------- --------- ---------
243,866 213,033 324,593
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 231,785 $ 68,410 $ (81,182)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 2,318 $ 684 $ (812)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 229,467 $ 67,726 $ (80,370)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 46.65 $ 13.77 $ (16.34)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 9,098 $ 902,134 $ 911,232
Distributions (1,056) (104,488) (105,544)
Net loss (812) (80,370) (81,182)
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 7,230 717,276 724,506
Distributions (908) (89,868) (90,776)
Net income 684 67,726 68,410
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 7,006 695,134 702,140
Distributions (2,435) (241,107) (243,542)
Net income 2,318 229,467 231,785
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 6,889 $ 683,494 $ 690,383
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 231,785 $ 68,410 $ (81,182)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 21,231 -- 48,745
Depletion 36,534 49,790 120,823
Gain on disposition of assets (1,005) -- (3,419)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (51,394) (7,809) 15,837
Accounts payable (851) 2,071 (4,734)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 236,300 112,462 96,070
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (2,609) (4,857) (5,631)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 1,059 1,226 3,419
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (1,550) (3,631) (2,212)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (243,542) (90,776) (105,544)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (8,792) 18,055 (11,686)
Cash at beginning of year 71,344 53,289 64,975
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 62,552 $ 71,344 $ 53,289
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. (the "Partnership") was organized in
1987 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Texas limited partnership in 1989. The Partnership's managing
general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $21,231 and $48,745
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000 and 1998, respectively.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $63,837 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 231,785 $ 68,410 $(81,182)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 33,614 47,165 116,988
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 21,231 -- 48,745
Other, net (643) (5,995) (1,248)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 285,987 $ 109,580 $ 83,303
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- ---------
Development costs $ 2,609 $ 4,857 $ 5,631
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
--------- ---------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 135,396 $ 135,396
Completed wells and equipment 3,144,754 3,142,199
--------- ---------
3,280,150 3,277,595
Accumulated depletion (2,733,516) (2,675,751)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 546,634 $ 601,844
========== ==========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $74,535 $73,744 $71,600
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $12,385 $ 5,720 $ 5,800
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. and the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties
to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
-------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 10 limited partner interests
owned by Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 87-B,
Ltd. is 19.66971% and 80.33029%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 230,505 316,120
Revisions (76,948) (70,310)
Production (17,879) (25,477)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 135,678 220,333
Revisions 155,187 272,717
Production (16,758) (24,436)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 274,107 468,614
Revisions (9,351) (76,076)
Production (16,015) (23,682)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 248,741 368,856
======== ========
10
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.26 per barrel of NGLs and $7.62 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $1,851,000 and undiscounted was $3,947,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 8,237 $ 6,760 $ 1,480
Future production costs (4,290) (3,786) (1,130)
------- ------- -------
3,947 2,974 350
10% annual discount factor (2,096) (1,454) (110)
------- ------- -------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 1,851 $ 1,520 $ 240
======= ======= =======
11
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (297) $ (123) $ (89)
Net changes in prices and production costs 795 742 (585)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (143) 1,162 (100)
Accretion of discount 152 24 94
Changes in production rates, timing and other (176) (525) (21)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 331 1,280 (701)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 1,520 240 941
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 1,851 $ 1,520 $ 240
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil and
gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10% of
total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 49% 50% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. 2% 1% 57%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 6% 26%
Phillips Petroleum Company 16% - -
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
and Phillips Petroleum Company were $23,391 and $10,443, respectively, which are
included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the
accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
12
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $4,919,000. Pioneer
USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership
capital less commission and organization and offering costs allocated to
the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs
and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the
extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
(A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 69% to $469,502 for 2000 as
compared to $278,326 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 10,352
barrels of oil, 5,663 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 23,682 mcf of
gas were sold, or 19,962 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 10,784
barrels of oil, 5,974 barrels of NGLs and 24,436 mcf of gas were sold, or 20,831
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.60, or 75%, from
$16.71 in 1999 to $29.31 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $7.17, or 74%, from $9.73 in 1999 to $16.90 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 82% from $1.64 in 1999 to $2.98 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $1,005, recognized during 2000, was
attributable to credits received from the disposal of oil and gas equipment on
one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $243,866 as compared to $213,033
in 1999, an increase of $30,833, or 14%. The increase was primarily due to the
impairment of oil and gas properties and increases in production costs and
general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $172,228 in 2000 and $155,029 in 1999, resulting in a
$17,199 increase, or 11%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production, offset by a decline in workover
expenses.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
69% from $8,214 in 1999 to $13,873 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $12,385 in 2000 and $5,720 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $21,231 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $36,534 in 2000 as compared to $49,790 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $13,256, or 27%. This decrease was primarily due to a 2,194 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 18% to $278,326 from
$236,434 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 10,784 barrels of oil,
5,974 barrels of NGLs and 24,436 mcf of gas were sold, or 20,831 BOEs. In 1998,
12,040 barrels of oil, 5,839 barrels of NGLs and 25,477 mcf of gas were sold, or
22,125 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.54, or 27%, from
$13.17 in 1998 to $16.71 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.91, or 43%, from $6.82 in 1998 to $9.73 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 10% from $1.49 in 1998 to $1.64 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $3,419 was recognized during 1998 from the
sale of oil and gas equipment on one well abandoned in a prior year. Abandoned
property costs of $965 in 1998 were related to this abandonment.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $213,033 as compared to $324,593
in 1998, a decrease of $111,560, or 34%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in depletion, the impairment of oil and gas properties and abandoned
property costs, offset by increases in production costs and G&A.
Production costs were $155,029 in 1999 and $146,967 in 1998, resulting in an
$8,062 increase, or 5%. The increase was due to increases in well maintenance
costs and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production, offset by a
decline in ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 16% from $7,093 in 1998 to $8,214 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $5,720 in
1999 and $5,800 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $48,745 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $49,790 in 1999 compared to $120,823 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $71,033, or 59%. This decrease was the result of a 92,485 barrels of
oil increase in proved reserves during 1999 as a result of higher commodity
prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken
in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in
oil production of 1,256 barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared
to the same period in 1998.
Petroleum Industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $123,838 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $193,203, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $17,199, G&A expenses paid of $5,659 and working capital of $46,507. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $213,360 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $20,157 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production, offset by a decline in workover expense.
The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the managing
general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as
a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were
related to expenditures for oil and gas equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $1,059 were comprised of $1,005 received
from salvage income on one fully depleted well and $54 from equipment credits
received on one active well. Proceeds of $1,226 received during 1999 were from
equipment credits received on one temporarily abandoned well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $243,542, of which $2,435 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $241,107 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $90,776, of which
$908 was distributed to the managing general partner and $89,868 to the limited
partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B CONV., LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 202,782 $ 212,568 $ 469,502 $ 278,326 $ 236,434 $ 345,942 $ 422,550
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 21,231 $ -- $ 48,745 $ 188,163 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 144,643
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 81,587 $ 106,637 $ 231,785 $ 68,410 $ (81,182) $ (85,292) $ 293,575
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 816 $ 1,066 $ 2,318 $ 684 $ (812) $ (853) $ 2,936
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 80,771 $ 105,571 $ 229,467 $ 67,726 $ (80,370) $ (84,439) $ 290,639
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 16.42 $ 21.46 $ 46.65 $ 13.77 $ (16.34) $ (17.17) $ 59.08
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 17.13 $ 22.65 $ 49.02 $ 18.27 $ 21.24 $ 35.81 $ 87.22(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 694,708 $ 708,190 $ 696,806 $ 709,414 $ 729,709 $ 921,169 $1,202,384
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $29.40
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
87-B, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 87-B, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 20,089
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 25,142
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 4,166
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 207.86
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.68 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 138.40
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 139.11
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 193.32
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 201.85
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 173
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as any
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2037, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-12244-02
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-2185706
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................. 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................. 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000............................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements.......................... 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................. 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K....................... 11
Signatures............................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 511,824 $ 257,845
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 201,924 357,836
----------- -----------
Total current assets 713,748 615,681
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 12,870,546 13,396,004
Accumulated depletion (10,744,417) (11,162,910)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 2,126,129 2,233,094
----------- -----------
$ 2,839,877 $ 2,848,775
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 31,516 $ 25,998
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 28,011 28,156
Limited partners (20,089 interests) 2,780,350 2,794,621
----------- -----------
2,808,361 2,822,777
----------- -----------
$ 2,839,877 $ 2,848,775
=========== ===========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 381,569 $ 414,169 $ 828,175 $ 868,113
Interest 3,969 5,225 8,639 8,911
Gain on disposition of assets 5,825 - 22,214 3,753
-------- -------- -------- --------
391,363 419,394 859,028 880,777
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 181,811 182,083 373,020 344,924
General and administrative 9,921 12,425 21,533 26,043
Depletion 39,698 35,965 113,888 74,516
Abandoned property 3,397 - 17,332 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
234,827 230,473 525,773 445,483
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 156,536 $ 188,921 $ 333,255 $ 435,294
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,565 $ 1,889 $ 3,332 $ 4,353
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 154,971 $ 187,032 $ 329,923 $ 430,941
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 7.71 $ 9.31 $ 16.42 $ 21.45
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 28,156 $2,794,621 $2,822,777
Distributions (3,477) (344,194) (347,671)
Net income 3,332 329,923 333,255
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 28,011 $2,780,350 $2,808,361
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 333,255 $ 435,294
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 113,888 74,516
Gain on disposition of assets (22,214) (3,753)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 155,912 (47,216)
Accounts payable 17,677 18,891
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 598,518 477,732
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (6,924) (3,228)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 10,056 3,753
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities 3,132 525
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (347,671) (459,528)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 253,979 18,729
Cash at beginning of period 257,845 262,756
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 511,824 $ 281,485
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Texas
75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 5% to $828,175 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $868,113 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in production and a decrease in
the average price received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
7
gas and NGLs. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 19,714 barrels of oil,
6,385 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 35,640 mcf of gas were sold,
or 32,039 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 21,676 barrels of oil, 11,585 barrels of NGLs and 47,808 mcf of gas were
sold, or 41,229 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.16, or 1%, from $27.30
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.14 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.21, or 15%, from
$15.08 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.29 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 141% from $2.13
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.13 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $22,214 was received during the six months
ended June 30, 2001 from disposal of equipment on two wells plugged and
abandoned during the current period. Expenses to plug and abandon these wells
were $17,332. For the six months ended June 30, 2000 a gain on disposition of
assets of $3,753 was recognized due to credits received from the disposal of oil
and gas equipment on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $525,773 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $445,483 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$80,290, or 18%. This increase was due to increases in depletion, production
costs and abandoned property costs, offset by a decline in general and
administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $373,020 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$344,924 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $28,096 increase, or 8%.
This increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
17% from $26,043 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $21,533 from the same
period in 2001, primarily due to less G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil
and gas revenues) due to lower oil and gas revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Depletion was $113,888 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$74,516 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $39,372, or 53%. This
increase was due to a downward revision to proved reserves on one significant
well, offset by a decline in oil production of 1,962 barrels for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
8
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 8% to $381,569 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $414,169 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and a decline in
the average price received for oil, offset by an increase in the average prices
received for gas and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 9,762
barrels of oil, 3,497 barrels of NGLs and 17,474 mcf of gas were sold, or 16,171
BOEs. For the three months ended June 30, 2000, 10,284 barrels of oil, 5,499
barrels of NGLs and 21,477 mcf of gas were sold, or 19,363 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased slightly from $26.86
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.73 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.42, or 3%, from
$14.98 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.40 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 47% from $2.59
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.82 for the same period in
2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $5,825 was received during the three months
ended June 30, 2001 from disposal of equipment on two wells plugged and
abandoned during the current period. Expenses to plug and abandon these wells
were $3,397.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $234,827 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $230,473 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$4,354, or 2%. This increase was due to increases in depletion and abandoned
property costs, offset by decreases in G&A and production costs.
Production costs were $181,811 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$182,083 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $272 decrease. This decrease
was primarily due to lower well maintenance costs, offset by an increase in
workover costs incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 20%, from $12,425 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $9,921 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to less G&A
being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) due to lower oil and gas
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period
in 2000 and a decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $39,698 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$35,965 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $3,733, or 10%. This
increase was primarily due to a downward revision to proved reserves on one
significant well, offset by a decline in oil production of 522 barrels for the
three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
9
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $120,786 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to reductions of $201,914 in working capital and $4,510 in G&A
expenses, offset by a decline in oil and gas sales receipts of $40,210 and
increases in production costs of $28,096 and abandoned property costs of
$17,332. The decrease in G&A was primarily due to less G&A being allocated
(limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) due to lower oil and gas revenues for
the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
decrease in oil and gas receipts resulted from a decline of $205,527 in
production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000 and a decline in
oil prices of $3,615, offset by an increase in gas and NGL prices of $168,932
during 2001. The increase in production costs was primarily due to additional
well maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 were related to expenditures for oil and gas equipment upgrades on
active properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $10,056 and $3,753 were recognized during
the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Proceeds recognized
during the period in 2001 were due to salvage income received on two wells
plugged and abandoned during the current period. Proceeds recognized during the
period in 2000 were from equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$347,671, of which $3,477 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$344,194 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $459,528, of which $4,595 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $454,933 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
10
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 8, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
-------------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-12244-02
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-2185706
------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$20,044,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 20,089.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 20,089 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 49% and 16% was attributable to sales
made to Plains Marketing, L.P. and Phillips Petroleum Company. Pioneer USA is of
the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not have an adverse effect
on its ability to sell its oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located in
Texas were acquired by the Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's
participation in the drilling of 64 oil and gas wells. At December 31, 2000, 49
wells were producing; one well was a dry hole from a previous year; five wells
have been plugged and abandoned and nine wells were sold.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 20,089 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 1,468 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $984,669 and
$367,015, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
------------------
Oil and gas sales $1,917,791 $1,136,700 $ 965,599 $1,412,905 $1,725,580
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 590,715
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ 86,674 $ - $ 199,037 $ 768,208 $ -
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 945,927 $ 279,094 $ (331,789) $ (347,350) $1,199,153
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 9,459 $ 2,791 $ (3,318) $ (3,473) $ 11,992
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 936,468 $ 276,303 $ (328,471) $ (343,877) $1,187,161
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 46.62 $ 13.75 $ (16.35) $ (17.12) $ 59.10
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 49.02 $ 18.27 $ 21.24 $ 35.83 $ 87.23 (a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
At year end:
------------
Identifiable assets $2,848,775 $2,900,940 $2,984,346 $3,766,001 $4,914,489
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $29.11
in 1996.
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 69% to $1,917,791 for 2000 as
compared to $1,136,700 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 42,280
barrels of oil, 23,121 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 96,740 mcf of
gas were sold, or 81,524 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 44,029
barrels of oil, 24,404 barrels of NGLs and 99,771 mcf of gas were sold, or
85,062 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production to
continue in the future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves
are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.60, or 75%, from
$16.71 in 1999 to $29.31 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $7.17, or 74%, from $9.73 in 1999 to $16.90 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 82% from $1.64 in 1999 to $2.98 in 2000. The
market price received for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past
decade and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $4,102, recognized during 2000, was
attributable to credits received from the disposal of oil and gas equipment on
one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $997,051 as compared to $870,434
in 1999, an increase of $126,617, or 15%. The increase was primarily due to the
impairment of oil and gas properties and increases in production costs and
general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $703,352 in 2000 and $633,091 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $70,261, or 11%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate production, offset by a decline in workover
expenses.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
69% from $34,237 in 1999 to $57,746 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $50,579 in 2000 and $23,361 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated
5
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $86,674 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $149,279 in 2000 compared to $203,106 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $53,827, or 27%. The decrease was primarily due to an 8,836 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 18% to $1,136,700 from
$965,599 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 44,029 barrels of oil,
24,404 barrels of NGLs and 99,771 mcf of gas were sold, or 85,062 BOEs. In 1998,
49,182 barrels of oil, 23,854 barrels of NGLs and 104,072 mcf of gas were sold,
or 90,381 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.54, or 27%, from
$13.17 in 1998 to $16.71 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.91, or 43%, from $6.82 in 1998 to $9.73 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 10% from $1.49 in 1998 to $1.64 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $13,965 was received during 1998 from the
sale of oil and gas equipment on one well abandoned in a prior year. Abandoned
property costs of $3,943 were incurred in 1998. These costs were attributable to
the plugging and abandonment of one uneconomical well in a prior year.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $870,434 as compared to $1,326,204
in 1998, a decrease of $455,770, or 34%. The decrease was due to declines in
depletion, the impairment of oil and gas properties and abandoned property
costs, offset by increases in production costs and G&A.
Production costs were $633,091 in 1999 and $600,702 in 1998, resulting in a
$32,389 increase, or 5%. The increase was due to increases in well maintenance
costs and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production, offset by a
decline in ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 18% from $28,968 in 1998 to $34,237 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $23,361 in
1999 and $23,688 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $199,037 related to its
oil and gas
6
properties during 1998.
Depletion was $203,106 in 1999 compared to $493,554 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $290,448, or 59%. The decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 377,754 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of 5,153
barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in
1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $569,152 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $789,348, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $70,261, G&A expenses paid of $23,509 and working capital of $126,426. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $871,310 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $81,962 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production, offset by a decline in workover expenses.
The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the managing
general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as
a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to
expenditures for oil and gas equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $4,326 and $5,007 were received during 2000
and 1999, respectively. The proceeds of $4,326 were due to $4,102 salvage income
on one fully depleted well
7
and the remaining $224 on equipment credits received on an active well. The
proceeds of $5,007 were due to equipment credits received on one temporarily
abandoned well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $994,615, of which $9,946 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $984,669 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $370,722, of which
$3,707 was distributed to the managing general partner and $367,015 to the
limited partners.
8
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 14
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 15
9
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
------------ -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 257,845 $ 262,756
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 357,836 179,571
------------ -----------
Total current assets 615,681 442,327
------------ -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 13,396,004 13,385,570
Accumulated depletion (11,162,910) (10,926,957)
------------ -----------
Net oil and gas properties 2,233,094 2,458,613
------------ -----------
$ 2,848,775 $ 2,900,940
============ ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 25,998 $ 29,475
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 28,156 28,643
Limited partners (20,089 interests) 2,794,621 2,842,822
------------ -----------
2,822,777 2,871,465
------------ -----------
$ 2,848,775 $ 2,900,940
============ ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $1,917,791 $1,136,700 $ 965,599
Interest 21,085 12,828 14,851
Gain on disposition of assets 4,102 - 13,965
---------- ---------- ----------
1,942,978 1,149,528 994,415
---------- ---------- ----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 703,352 633,091 600,702
General and administrative 57,746 34,237 28,968
Impairment of oil and gas properties 86,674 - 199,037
Depletion 149,279 203,106 493,554
Abandoned property - - 3,943
---------- ---------- ----------
997,051 870,434 1,326,204
---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 945,927 $ 279,094 $ (331,789)
========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 9,459 $ 2,791 $ (3,318)
========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 936,468 $ 276,303 $ (328,471)
========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership
interest $ 46.62 $ 13.75 $ (16.35)
========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 37,187 $3,688,711 $3,725,898
Distributions (4,310) (426,706) (431,016)
Net loss (3,318) (328,471) (331,789)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 29,559 2,933,534 2,963,093
Distributions (3,707) (367,015) (370,722)
Net income 2,791 276,303 279,094
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 28,643 2,842,822 2,871,465
Distributions (9,946) (984,669) (994,615)
Net income 9,459 936,468 945,927
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 28,156 $2,794,621 $2,822,777
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 945,927 $ 279,094 $(331,789)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 86,674 - 199,037
Depletion 149,279 203,106 493,554
Gain on disposition of assets (4,102) - (13,965)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (178,265) (63,538) 64,682
Accounts payable (3,477) 8,222 (18,850)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 996,036 426,884 392,669
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (10,658) (19,835) (22,998)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 4,326 5,007 13,965
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (6,332) (14,828) (9,033)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (994,615) (370,722) (431,016)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (4,911) 41,334 (47,380)
Cash at beginning of year 262,756 221,422 268,802
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 257,845 $ 262,756 $ 221,422
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 87-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the
15
respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and gas
properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline
in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of its
oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on proved
reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $86,674 and $199,037
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000 and 1998, respectively.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
16
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $261,429 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---------- -------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 945,927 $279,094 $(331,789)
Intangible development costs capitalized for
financial reporting purposes and expensed
for tax reporting purposes -- (273) (5)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 137,352 192,661 477,912
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 86,674 -- 199,037
Loss on sale of assets for tax reporting purposes
greater than amounts for financial reporting
purposes -- (25,328) --
Other, net (2,628) 2,156 (4,671)
---------- -------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $1,167,325 $448,310 $ 340,484
========== ======== =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---------- -------- ---------
Development costs $ 10,658 $ 19,835 $ 22,998
========== ======== =========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 552,956 $ 552,956
Completed wells and equipment 12,843,048 12,832,614
----------- -----------
13,396,004 13,385,570
Accumulated depletion (11,162,910) (10,926,957)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 2,233,094 $ 2,458,613
=========== ===========
17
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---------- -------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 304,400 $ 301,167 $ 292,411
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 50,579 $ 23,361 $ 23,688
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. In addition,
Pioneer USA, Parker & Parsley 87-B Conv., Ltd. and the Partnership (the
"Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer
USA (1) Partnerships (2)
---------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 45 limited partner interests
owned by Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 87-B
Conv., Ltd. is 80.33029% and 19.66971%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
18
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ -------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 941,555 1,291,273
Revisions (314,311) (287,194)
Production (73,036) (104,072)
----------- ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 554,208 900,007
Revisions 633,879 1,113,934
Production (68,433) (99,771)
----------- ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 1,119,654 1,914,170
Revisions (38,404) (311,039)
Production (65,401) (96,740)
----------- ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 1,015,849 1,506,391
=========== ============
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net revenues
of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64 per
barrel of oil, $13.26 per barrel of NGLs and $7.62 per mcf of gas, discounted at
10% was approximately $7,561,000 and undiscounted was $16,119,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 33,638 $ 27,613 $ 6,049
Future production costs (17,519) (15,463) (4,620)
---------- ---------- ----------
16,119 12,150 1,429
10% annual discount factor (8,558) (5,940) (449)
---------- ---------- ----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 7,561 $ 6,210 $ 980
========== ========== ==========
19
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (1,214) $ (504) $ (365)
Net changes in prices and production costs 3,247 3,033 (2,391)
Revisions of estimated future development costs - - -
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (587) 4,749 (410)
Accretion of discount 621 98 385
Changes in production rates, timing and other (716) (2,146) (87)
---------- ----------- ----------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,351 5,230 (2,868)
---------- ----------- ----------
Balance, beginning of year 6,210 980 3,848
---------- ----------- ----------
Balance, end of year $ 7,561 $ 6,210 $ 980
========== =========== ==========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Plains Marketing, L.P. 49% 50% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. 2% - 57%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 6% 26%
Phillips Petroleum Company 16% 9% 8%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
and Phillips Petroleum Company were $95,526 and $42,656, respectively, which are
included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the
accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general
partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all production
expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays
1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1%
of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
20
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$20,089,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of
initial Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to
the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
21
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of Texas
with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
22
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until August 1997.
From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October 1996,
he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From June 1988
to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
23
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 25% of its operating and general
and administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated approximately
25% of the Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 45 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
24
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $304,400 $ 301,167 $292,411
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 50,579 $ 23,361 $ 23,688
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
25
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
26
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
Dated: March 28, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
-----------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 28, 2001
----------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 28, 2001
---------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 28, 2001
---------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 28, 2001
---------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 28, 2001
---------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 28, 2001
---------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
4(a) Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parker -
& Parsley 87-B, Ltd. incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-16910) (hereinafter
called the Partnership's Registration Statement
4(b) Form of Subscription Agreement and Power -
of Attorney incorporated by reference to
Exhibit D of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
D of the Partnership's Registration Statement
10(b) Development Program Agreement incorporated -
by reference to Exhibit C of the Partnership's
Registration Statement
28
PARKER & PARSLEY 87-B, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 828,175 $ 868,113 $1,917,791 $1,136,700 $ 965,599 $1,412,905 $1,725,580
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 590,715
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 86,674 $ -- $ 199,037 $ 768,208 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 333,255 $ 435,294 $ 945,927 $ 279,094 $ (331,789) $ (347,350) $1,199,153
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 3,332 $ 4,353 $ 9,459 $ 2,791 $ (3,318) $ (3,473) $ 11,992
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 329,923 $ 430,941 $ 936,468 $ 276,303 $ (328,471) $ (343,877) $1,187,161
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 16.42 $ 21.45 $ 46.62 $ 13.75 $ (16.35) $ (17.12) $ 59.10
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 17.13 $ 22.65 $ 49.02 $ 18.27 $ 21.24 $ 35.83 $ 87.23(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $2,839,877 $2,895,597 $2,848,775 $2,900,940 $2,984,346 $3,766,001 $4,914,489
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of $29.11
in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus
dated October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on From 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 12,213
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 12,217
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 2,589
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 212.75
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.12 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 97.65
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 90.89
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 195.89
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 206.62
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment (f) --
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Not applicable. Since this partnership purchased producing properties,
there were no intangible drilling and development costs nor any related
write-off for tax purposes.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2037, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-11193-1
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-2195512
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000....................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000...................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001...................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements.............................. 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations...................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K........................... 11
Signatures................................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 341,227 $ 182,206
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 243,058 296,053
---------- ----------
Total current assets 584,285 478,259
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,500,277 5,701,037
Accumulated depletion (4,847,421) (5,019,550)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 652,856 681,487
---------- ----------
$ 1,237,141 $ 1,159,746
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 31,206 $ 37,242
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 13,300 12,466
Limited partners (24,426 interests) 1,192,635 1,110,038
---------- ----------
1,205,935 1,122,504
---------- ----------
$ 1,237,141 $ 1,159,746
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 324,594 $ 329,057 $ 708,005 $ 695,926
Interest 3,151 4,213 6,647 7,149
Gain on disposition of assets 11,917 8,716 39,237 24,345
-------- -------- -------- --------
339,662 341,986 753,889 727,420
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 163,644 200,770 333,829 359,931
General and administrative 12,473 9,872 23,975 20,878
Depletion 14,729 15,068 29,881 33,217
Abandoned property 5,192 286 17,463 13,069
-------- -------- -------- --------
196,038 225,996 405,148 427,095
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 143,624 $ 115,990 $ 348,741 $ 300,325
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,436 $ 1,160 $ 3,487 $ 3,003
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 142,188 $ 114,830 $ 345,254 $ 297,322
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 5.82 $ 4.70 $ 14.13 $ 12.17
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 12,466 $1,110,038 $1,122,504
Distributions (2,653) (262,657) (265,310)
Net income 3,487 345,254 348,741
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 13,300 $1,192,635 $1,205,935
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 348,741 $ 300,325
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 29,881 33,217
Gain on disposition of assets (39,237) (24,345)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 52,995 (43,526)
Accounts payable 9,767 197
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 402,147 265,868
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,249) (3,387)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 23,433 34,391
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities 22,184 31,004
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (265,310) (301,342)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 159,021 (4,470)
Cash at beginning of period 182,206 170,538
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 341,227 $ 166,068
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 2% to $708,005 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $695,926 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a decline in production and lower average prices received
for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 20,840 barrels of oil, 3,745
7
barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 24,458 mcf of gas were sold, or
28,661 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 21,685 barrels of oil, 4,984 barrels of NGLs and 22,894 mcf of gas were
sold, or 30,485 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.19, or 1%, from $27.33
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.14 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.43, or 4%, from $11.41
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $11.84 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 98% from $2.03 for the six
months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.01 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Gains on disposition of assets of $39,237 and $24,345 were recognized during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during the period ended June 30, 2001 was due to $25,956 from equipment credits
on one well plugged and abandoned in the current period and $13,281 was
primarily due to equipment credits received on fully depleted wells. The gain
recognized during the period ended June 30, 2000 was comprised of $10,858 from
equipment credits on one well plugged and abandoned in the current period and
$13,487 salvage income primarily from wells plugged and abandoned during 1999.
Expenses incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 to plug and
abandon these wells were $17,463 and $13,069, respectively.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $405,148 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $427,095 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $21,947,
or 5%. This decrease was the result of lower production costs and depletion,
offset by increases in abandoned property costs and general and administrative
expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $333,829 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$359,931 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $26,102 decrease, or 7%.
The decrease was primarily due to a decline in workover expense, offset by
additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
15% from $20,878 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $23,975 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $29,881 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$33,217 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $3,336, or 10%. This decrease
was primarily due to a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long- Lived
Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121") during the fourth quarter of 2000.
8
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 1% to $324,594 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $329,057 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
NGLs and a decline in production, offset by higher average prices received for
gas. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 9,760 barrels of oil, 1,965
barrels of NGLs and 12,708 mcf of gas were sold, or 13,843 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 9,809 barrels of oil, 2,987 barrels of NGLs and
13,759 mcf of gas were sold, or 15,089 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.41, or 2%, from $27.16
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.75 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $.61, or 6%, from $11.07
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $10.46 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 57% from $2.15 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.38 for the same period in 2001.
Gains on disposition of assets of $11,917 and $8,716 were recognized for the
three months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during the period ended June 30, 2001 was due to equipment credits received on
fully depleted wells. The gain recognized during the period ended June 30, 2000,
consisted of $4,981 from equipment credits received on a fully depleted well and
$3,735 salvage income on a well plugged and abandoned during 1999. Expenses
incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 to plug and
abandon these wells totaled $5,192 and $286, respectively.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $196,038 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $225,996 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$29,958, or 13%. This decrease was due to declines in production costs and
depletion, offset by increases in abandoned property costs and G&A.
Production costs were $163,644 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$200,770 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $37,126 decrease, or 18%.
The decrease was primarily due to less workover expense.
During this period, G&A increased 26% from $9,872 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $12,473 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to an
increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $14,729 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$15,068 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $339, or 2%.
9
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $136,279 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period in 2000. The increase was
attributable to an increase of $11,577 in oil and gas sales receipts, a
reduction of $106,091 in working capital and a decline of $26,102 in production
costs, offset by increases in abandoned property costs of $4,394 and G&A
expenses of $3,097. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the
increase in gas and NGL prices of $47,580 during 2001, offset by a decline of
$31,828 in production and a $4,175 decline resulting from lower oil prices
received in 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The decrease in
production costs was primarily due to a decline in workover expenses, offset by
additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production. The
increase in G&A was primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were related to upgrade expenditures for oil and gas
equipment on active properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $23,433 and $34,391 were received during
the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The proceeds
recognized during the period in 2001 were comprised of $10,152 from equipment
credits on one well plugged and abandoned during the current period and $13,281
was from salvage income on fully depleted wells. The proceeds recognized during
the period in 2000 were primarily from equipment credits on wells plugged and
abandoned during 2000 and 1999.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$265,310, of which $2,653 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$262,657 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $301,342, of which $3,013 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $298,329 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
10
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING
PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 6, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-11193-1
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-2195512
------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($500 PER UNIT)
---------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$12,170,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 24,426.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas. The
Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
("Pioneer USA"). Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural
Resources Company ("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 24,426
limited partnership interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 59%, 15% and 11% were attributable to
sales made to Plains Marketing, L.P., Phillips Petroleum Company and TEPPCO
Crude Oil LLC, respectively. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any
one purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and
2
ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that could expose the
Partnership to substantial liability due to pollution and other environmental
damages. Although the Partnership believes that its business operations do not
impair environmental quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable
environmental regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot
predict what, if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its
current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
The Partnership completed seven purchases of producing properties. These
acquisitions involved the purchase of working interests in 187 properties of
which 98 uneconomical oil and gas wells were plugged and abandoned and seven
wells were sold. The Partnership also participated in the drilling of two oil
and gas wells during 1988 which were completed as producers. During 1997, the
Partnership participated in the recompletion of one well in which Pioneer USA
acquired the deep rights. The Partnership already owned the shallow rights of
the well bore. At December 31, 2000, the Partnership had 85 producing oil and
gas wells.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 24,426 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 1,104 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $618,681 and
$223,952, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- -------- --------- ---------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $1,514,918 $ 860,305 $ 807,421 $1,244,727 $1,772,612
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,935
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ 59,777 $ 43,412 $ 37,388 $ 420,264 $ 39,087
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) $ 601,515 $ 134,700 $ (357,482) $ (397,297) $ 984,877
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 6,015 $ 1,347 $ (3,575) $ (3,973) $ 9,849
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 595,500 $ 133,353 $ (353,907) $ (393,324) $ 975,028
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 24.38 $ 5.46 $ (14.49) $ (16.10) $ 39.92
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 25.33 $ 9.17 $ 9.31 $ 24.14 $ 36.01 (a)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $1,159,746 $1,181,827 $1,270,446 $1,871,158 $2,817,583
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
---------------
(a) Including litigation settlement of $.81 per limited partnership interest in
1996.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
4
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 76% to $1,514,918 for 2000 as
compared to $860,305 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 43,390
barrels of oil, 10,266 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 45,872 mcf of
gas were sold, or 61,301 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 41,606
barrels of oil, 11,495 barrels of NGLs and 53,145 mcf of gas were sold, or
61,959 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.54, or 75%, from
$16.80 in 1999 to $29.34 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $4.80, or 66%, from $7.32 in 1999 to $12.12 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 75% from $1.46 in 1999 to $2.56 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $37,944 recognized during 2000 resulted from
$26,860 in salvage income received on a fully depleted well and wells plugged
and abandoned in prior years, in addition to an $11,084 gain recognized from the
abandonment of three wells during the current year. Gain on disposition of
assets of $25,173 for 1999 resulted from $17,629 in salvage income received on
the abandonment of two oil and gas wells during 1999, in addition to $7,544
salvage income received on fully depleted wells and wells plugged and abandoned
in prior years.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $967,456 as compared to $760,971
in 1999, an increase of $206,485, or 27%. The increase was due to higher
production costs, general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), the impairment of
oil and gas properties and abandoned property costs, offset by a decline in
depletion.
Production costs were $765,021 in 2000 and $555,988 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $209,033, or 38%. The increase was primarily due to additional
workover costs and well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate production and
higher production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
76%, from $25,809 in 1999 to $45,448 in 2000 primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $29,711 in 2000 and $1,550 in 1999
for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized
non-cash charges of $59,777 and $43,412 related to its oil and gas properties
during 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Depletion was $69,296 in 2000 as compared to $109,034 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $39,738, or 36%. This decrease was primarily due to a 119,706
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1999.
Abandoned property costs of $27,914 and $26,728 were incurred on the abandonment
of several properties in 2000 and 1999, respectively.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 7% to $860,305 from
$807,421 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 41,606 barrels of oil,
11,495 barrels of NGLs and 53,145 mcf of gas were sold, or 61,959 BOEs. In 1998,
51,039 barrels of oil, 13,328 barrels of NGLs and 56,240 mcf of gas were sold,
or 73,740 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.76, or 29%, from
$13.04 in 1998 to $16.80 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $1.86, or 34%, from $5.46 in 1998 to $7.32 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 19% from $1.23 in 1998 to $1.46 in 1999.
The $25,173 gain on disposition of assets for 1999 resulted from $17,629 in
salvage income received on the abandonment of two oil and gas wells during 1999,
in addition to $7,544 salvage income received on fully depleted wells and wells
plugged and abandoned in prior years. During 1998, the $24,040 gain on
disposition of assets resulted from $29,099 in salvage income received during
1998 on properties that were plugged and abandoned in prior years, offset by a
$5,059 loss on the abandonment of two oil and gas wells and one saltwater
disposal well.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $760,971 as compared to $1,202,296
in 1998, a decrease of $441,325, or 37%. The decrease was due to declines in
depletion, production costs and abandoned property costs, offset by increases in
the impairment of oil and gas properties and G&A.
Production costs were $555,988 in 1999 and $682,634 in 1998, resulting in a
$126,646 decrease, or 19%. The decrease was due to reductions in well
maintenance costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in workover costs
incurred to stimulate production.
During this period, G&A increased 7%, from $24,223 in 1998 to $25,809 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
6
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $1,550 in 1999 and $10,723 in 1998 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized non-cash SFAS 121 charges of $43,412 and $37,388
related to its oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Depletion was $109,034 in 1999 compared to $383,398 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $274,364, or 72%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 306,417 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and
a decline in oil production of 9,433 barrels for the period ended December 31,
1999 compared to the same period in 1998.
Abandoned property costs of $26,728 and $74,653 were incurred on the abandonment
of several properties in 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $389,055 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $660,529, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $209,033, G&A expenses paid of $19,639, abandoned property costs paid of
$1,186 and working capital of $41,616. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an
additional $641,727 to oil and gas receipts and an increase of $18,802 resulting
from an increase in oil production during 2000. The increase in production costs
was primarily due to increased production taxes associated with higher oil and
gas prices and additional workover and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
7
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to the
addition of oil and gas equipment on active properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $57,999 for 2000 resulted from $36,906
salvage income on a fully depleted well and wells abandoned in a prior year,
$15,711 salvage income received on two wells plugged and abandoned in 2000 and
$5,382 from equipment credits on one active well. Proceeds from disposition of
assets of $21,887 for 1999 resulted from $7,583 in salvage income received on
one well plugged and abandoned during 1999, in addition to $7,544 salvage income
primarily received on fully depleted wells and $6,760 from equipment credits on
one active well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $624,930, of which $6,249 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $618,681 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $226,214, of which
$2,262 was distributed to the managing general partner and $223,952 to the
limited partners.
8
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 14
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 15
9
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
87-A, Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of
operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
10
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
------------ ------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 182,206 $ 170,538
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 296,053 195,636
------------ -----------
Total current assets 478,259 366,174
------------ -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,701,037 5,774,563
Accumulated depletion (5,019,550) (4,958,910)
------------ -----------
Net oil and gas properties 681,487 815,653
------------ -----------
$ 1,159,746 $1,181,827
============ ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 37,242 $ 35,908
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 12,466 12,700
Limited partners (24,426 interests) 1,110,038 1,133,219
------------ -----------
1,122,504 1,145,919
------------ -----------
$ 1,159,746 $1,181,827
============ ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 1,514,918 $ 860,305 $ 807,421
Interest 16,109 10,193 13,353
Gain on disposition of assets 37,944 25,173 24,040
----------- ----------- -----------
1,568,971 895,671 844,814
----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 765,021 555,988 682,634
General and administrative 45,448 25,809 24,223
Impairment of oil and gas properties 59,777 43,412 37,388
Depletion 69,296 109,034 383,398
Abandoned property 27,914 26,728 74,653
----------- ----------- -----------
967,456 760,971 1,202,296
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 601,515 $ 134,700 $ (357,482)
=========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 6,015 $ 1,347 $ (3,575)
=========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 595,500 $ 133,353 $ (353,907)
=========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership
interest $ 24.38 $ 5.46 $ (14.49)
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 19,487 $1,805,112 $1,824,599
Distributions (2,297) (227,387) (229,684)
Net loss (3,575) (353,907) (357,482)
---------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 13,615 1,223,818 1,237,433
Distributions (2,262) (223,952) (226,214)
Net income 1,347 133,353 134,700
---------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 12,700 1,133,219 1,145,919
Distributions (6,249) (618,681) (624,930)
Net income 6,015 595,500 601,515
---------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 12,466 $1,110,038 $1,122,504
========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 601,515 $ 134,700 $(357,482)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 59,777 43,412 37,388
Depletion 69,296 109,034 383,398
Gain on disposition of assets (37,944) (25,173) (24,040)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (100,417) (80,454) 95,326
Accounts payable (8,712) 12,941 (13,546)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 583,515 194,460 121,044
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas equipment (4,916) (2,818) (11,491)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 57,999 21,887 83,839
---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash provided by investing activities 53,083 19,069 72,348
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (624,930) (226,214) (229,684)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 11,668 (12,685) (36,292)
Cash at beginning of year 170,538 183,223 219,515
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash at end of year $ 182,206 $ 170,538 $ 183,223
========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas. The
Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas production in Texas and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income (loss) of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the
15
respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of the cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and gas
properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline
in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of its
oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on proved
reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $59,777, $43,412 and
$37,388 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
16
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $1,521,385 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income (loss) per Federal income tax returns for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 601,515 $ 134,700 $ (357,482)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes (greater than) less than
amounts for financial reporting purposes (12,672) 47,101 (84,454)
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 59,777 43,412 37,388
Other, net (15,730) (2,287) 4,922
-------- -------- ---------
Net income (loss) per Federal income
tax returns $ 632,890 $ 222,926 $ (399,626)
======== ======== =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the net costs incurred, whether capitalized
or expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Property acquisition costs $ 4,087 $ 1,104 $ 11,491
======== ======== =========
Development costs $ 829 $ 1,714 $ -
======== ======== =========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $5,021,262 $ 5,095,617
Completed wells and equipment 679,775 678,946
---------- -----------
5,701,037 5,774,563
Accumulated depletion (5,019,550) (4,958,910)
---------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 681,487 $ 815,653
========== ===========
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ----------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 268,224 $ 254,244 $ 292,539
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 29,711 $ 1,550 $ 10,723
17
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees Producing Properties 87-A ("EMPL") and the Partnership are parties
to the Program agreement. EMPL is a general partnership organized for the
benefit of certain employees of Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on
December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
--------------- -----------
Revenues:
Revenues from oil and gas production, proceeds from
sales of producing properties and all other
revenues:
Before payout (2) 4.040405% 95.959595%
After payout 19.191920% 80.808080%
Costs and expenses:
Property acquisition costs, operating costs, general
and administrative expenses and other costs:
Before payout (2) 4.040405% 95.959595%
After payout 19.191920% 80.808080%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 86 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The Partnership has not reached payout.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
18
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 719,789 996,755
Revisions (302,841) (385,883)
Production (64,367) (56,240)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 352,581 554,632
Revisions 461,643 633,460
Production (53,101) (53,145)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 761,123 1,134,947
Revisions 6,756 (376,058)
Production (53,656) (45,872)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 714,223 713,017
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $12.58 per barrel of NGLs and $7.60 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $4,683,000 and undiscounted was $9,322,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
19
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 22,258 $ 18,298 $ 3,739
Future production costs (12,936) (10,698) (2,777)
----------- ----------- -----------
9,322 7,600 962
10% annual discount factor (4,639) (3,477) (323)
----------- ----------- -----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 4,683 $ 4,123 $ 639
=========== =========== ===========
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (750) $ (304) $ (125)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,685 1,668 (1,687)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (339) 3,013 (453)
Accretion of discount 412 64 275
Changes in production rates, timing and other (448) (957) (118)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 560 3,484 (2,108)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 4,123 639 2,747
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 4,683 $ 4,123 $ 639
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 59% 60% -
Phillips Petroleum Company 15% 14% 16%
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 11% - -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 66%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.,
Phillips Petroleum Company and TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC were $78,270, $54,144 and
$29,228, respectively, which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable -
oil and gas sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Partnership
20
affairs. As managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's
properties, all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed
to the Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues
are received directly by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the
Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general
partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion
costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In
return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$12,213,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of
initial Partnership capital less commission and organization and offering
costs allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts
necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership
agreement to the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
21
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of Texas
with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
22
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until August 1997.
From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October 1996,
he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From June 1988
to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
23
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA pays 1% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated 1% of the Program's
revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 86 limited partnership interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer of director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
24
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $268,224 $ 254,244 $292,539
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 29,711 $ 1,550 $ 10,723
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
25
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
26
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING
PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
Dated: March 26, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 26, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
27
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited -
Partnership of Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-A, Ltd. incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3a of Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
4(a) Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parker -
& Parsley Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd.
incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of
Amendment No, 1 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-11193)
4(b) Subscription Agreement incorporated by -
reference to Exhibit C of Amendment No. 1
of the Partnership's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference -
to Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4c of the Partnership's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
10(b) Program Agreement incorporated by reference -
to Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
28
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-A, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 31, Years ended December 31,
--------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 708,005 $ 695,926 $1,514,918 $ 860,305 $ 807,421 $1,244,727 $1,772,612
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 19,935
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 59,777 $ 43,412 $ 37,388 $ 420,264 $ 39,087
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 348,741 $ 300,325 $ 601,515 $ 134,700 $ (357,482) $ (397,297) $ 984,877
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 3,487 $ 3,003 $ 6,015 $ 1,347 $ (3,575) $ (3,973) $ 9,849
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 345,254 $ 297,322 $ 595,500 $ 133,353 $ (353,907) $ (393,324) $ 975,028
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 14.13 $ 12.17 $ 24.38 $ 5.46 $ (14.49) $ (16.10) $ 39.92
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 10.75 $ 12.21 $ 25.33 $ 9.17 $ 9.31 $ 24.14 $ 36.01(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,237,141 $1,191,053 $1,159,746 $1,181,827 $1,270,446 $1,871,158 $2,817,583
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement of $.81 per limited partnership interest in
1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus
dated October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of
limited partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of
June 30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 6,096
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 6,870
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer USA(a),(b) $ 2,297
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b),(c) $382.94
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.77 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b),(c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $140.92
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $136.41
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c),(d) $356.97
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c),(e) $371.47
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(f) --
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should not
assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the value
or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the operating
period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as in the
merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share of
the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3% of
the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July 13,
2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses represent
estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell the assets
of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs associated with
such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the partnership.
(f) Not applicable. Since this partnership purchased producing properties, there
were no intangible drilling and development costs nor any related write-off
for tax purposes.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
(1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners; and (2)
neither the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any
limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to
render the opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as
to matters of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on
behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an
approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is
attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2037, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-11193-2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-2205943
------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
-------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................. 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 113,962 $ 19,277
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 139,187 194,002
---------- ----------
Total current assets 253,149 213,279
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 4,832,086 4,829,203
Accumulated depletion (4,199,123) (4,181,937)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 632,963 647,266
---------- ----------
$ 886,112 $ 860,545
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 18,189 $ 20,375
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 8,939 8,661
Limited partners (12,191 interests) 858,984 831,509
---------- ----------
867,923 840,170
---------- ----------
$ 886,112 $ 860,545
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 197,119 $ 205,745 $ 435,162 $ 469,537
Interest 1,073 1,465 2,253 2,536
Gain on disposition of assets - - - 8,294
-------- -------- -------- --------
198,192 207,210 437,415 480,367
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 122,377 82,693 209,886 192,129
General and administrative 5,914 6,172 13,055 14,086
Depletion 7,634 8,103 17,186 18,829
-------- -------- -------- --------
135,925 96,968 240,127 225,044
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 62,267 $ 110,242 $ 197,288 $ 255,323
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 623 $ 1,102 $ 1,973 $ 2,553
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 61,644 $ 109,140 $ 195,315 $ 252,770
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 5.06 $ 8.95 $ 16.02 $ 20.73
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 8,661 $ 831,509 $ 840,170
Distributions (1,695) (167,840) (169,535)
Net income 1,973 195,315 197,288
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 8,939 $ 858,984 $ 867,923
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 197,288 $ 255,323
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 17,186 18,829
Gain on disposition of assets - (8,294)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 54,815 17,448
Accounts payable (2,186) (789)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 267,103 282,517
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas equipment (2,883) -
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 13,944
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (2,883) 13,944
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (169,535) (265,842)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 94,685 30,619
Cash at beginning of period 19,277 21,724
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 113,962 $ 52,343
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 7% to $435,162 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $469,537 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in production and lower average
prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
7
NGLs. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 10,264 barrels of oil, 3,788
barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 19,481 mcf of gas were sold, or
17,299 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 11,962 barrels of oil, 5,429 barrels of NGLs and 26,130 mcf of gas were
sold, or 21,746 BOEs. Of the decrease, 1,740 BOEs are attributable to the fact
that on April 1, 2000 the Partnership's revenue and operating expense allocation
reverted to 80.808081% from 95.959595% pursuant to the Program agreement
governing the Partnership which provides for a reversionary interest of
80.808081% once cumulative distributions equal initial partners' capital
("Reversionary Interest").
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $1.07, or 4%, from $27.96
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.89 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.22, or 15%, from
$14.82 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.04 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 133% to $4.86 for
the six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to $2.09 for the same period in
2000. The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past
decade and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $8,294 was recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2000. The gain was due to equipment credits received on fully
depleted wells.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $240,127 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $225,044 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$15,083, or 7%. This increase was due to an increase in production costs, offset
by declines in depletion and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $209,886 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$192,129 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $17,757 increase, or 9%. A
20% increase in production costs resulted from higher well maintenance and
workover costs incurred to stimulate well production, offset by an 11% decline
in lease operating costs and production taxes attributable to the Reversionary
Interest change.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
7% from $14,086 for the six months ended June 30, 2000, to $13,055 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to the Reversionary Interest change as noted
above.
Depletion was $17,186 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$18,829 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $1,643, or 9%. This decrease
was primarily due to a decrease in oil production of 1,698 barrels for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
8
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 4% to $197,119 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $205,745 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
a decrease in production, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 4,872 barrels of oil, 2,038
barrels of NGLs and 9,647 mcf of gas were sold, or 8,518 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 4,955 barrels of oil, 2,418 barrels of NGLs and
11,575 mcf of gas were sold, or 9,302 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $1.93, or 7%, from $28.54
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.61 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.61, or 4%, from $14.68
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.29 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 51% from $2.49 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.77 for the same period in 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $135,925 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $96,968 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$38,957, or 40%. This increase was due to higher production costs, offset by
decreases in depletion and G&A.
Production costs were $122,377 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$82,693 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $39,684 increase, or 48%.
The increase was the result of additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 4% from $6,172 for the three months ended June
30, 2000 to $5,914 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to decreased audit
and tax fees.
Depletion was $7,634 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$8,103 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $469, or 6%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $15,414 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period in 2000. This decrease was due
to a reduction in oil and gas receipts of $34,658 and an increase in production
costs of $17,757, offset by a decrease in G&A expenses of $1,031 and a reduction
in working capital of $35,970. The increase in production costs was primarily
due to higher well maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well
production, offset by the Reversionary Interest change. The decrease in oil and
gas sales receipts resulted from a decline of $106,201 in production in 2001 as
9
compared to the same period in 2000 and a decline in oil prices of $12,792,
offset by an increase in gas and NGL prices of $84,335 during 2001. The decrease
in G&A was primarily due to the Reversionary Interest change.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 were related to expenditures for upgrades of oil and gas equipment
on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $13,944 were received for the six months
ending June 30, 2000. The proceeds were primarily from equipment credits on
fully depleted wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$169,535, of which $1,695 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$167,840 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $265,842, of which $2,658 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $263,184 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
10
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING
PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 7, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
-----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-11193-2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-2205943
------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($500 PER UNIT)
---------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$5,997,500.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 12,191.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1987 under the laws of the state of Texas. The
Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
("Pioneer USA"). Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural
Resources Company ("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 12,191
limited partnership interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 32%, 22% and 20% were attributable to
sales made to Plains Marketing, L.P., TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and Phillips
Petroleum Company, respectively. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of
any one purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its
oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial liability due to pollution and other
environmental damages. Although the Partnership believes that
2
its business operations do not impair environmental quality and that its costs
of complying with any applicable environmental regulations are not currently
significant, the Partnership cannot predict what, if any, effect these
environmental regulations may have on its current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
The Partnership completed seven purchases of producing properties. These
acquisitions involved the purchase of working interests in 54 properties. The
Partnership also participated in the drilling of two oil and gas wells during
1988 which were completed as producers. Additionally, the Partnership purchased
15 overriding royalty interests effective January 1, 1990 and two additional
overriding royalty interests during 1991. Twenty-two uneconomical wells have
been abandoned. At December 31, 2000, the Partnership had 34 producing oil and
gas wells.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 12,191 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 550 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $586,016 and $170,405, respectively,
of such revenue-related distributions were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- -------- --------- ---------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 982,604 $ 625,861 $ 532,606 $ 846,163 $ 980,232
========= ======== ========= ========= =========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ - $ - $ 35,017 $ 317,255 $ 42,277
========= ======== ========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) $ 562,621 $ 163,148 $ (118,738) $ (142,439) $ 303,380
========= ======== ========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 5,626 $ 1,631 $ (1,187) $ (1,424) $ 3,034
========= ======== ========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 556,995 $ 161,517 $ (117,551) $ (141,015) $ 300,346
========= ======== ========= ========= =========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 45.69 $ 13.25 $ (9.64) $ (11.57) $ 24.64
========= ======== ========= ========= =========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 48.07 $ 13.98 $ 16.41 $ 39.20 $ 35.59
========= ======== ========= ========= =========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $ 860,545 $ 892,550 $ 878,401 $1,241,161 $1,823,614
========= ======== ========= ========= =========
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 57% to $982,604 for 2000 as
compared to $625,861 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 22,713
barrels of oil, 10,402 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 49,380 mcf of
gas were sold, or 41,345 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 24,976
barrels of oil, 10,794 barrels of NGLs and 48,774 mcf of gas were sold, or
43,899 BOEs. Of the decrease, 5,393 BOEs are attributable to the fact that on
April 1, 2000, the Partnership's revenue and operating expense allocation
reverted to 80.808081% from 95.959595% pursuant to the Program Agreement
governing the Partnership which provides for a reversionary interest of
80.808081% once cumulative distributions equal initial partner's capital
("Reversionary Interest"). This is offset by a production increase of 2,839
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $11.92, or 68%, from
$17.44 in 1999 to $29.36 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.36, or 62%, from $10.32 in 1999 to $16.68 in 2000. The average
price received per mcf of gas increased 78% from $1.62 in 1999 to $2.88 in 2000.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gains on disposition of assets of $8,294 and $11,482 were recognized in 2000 and
1999, respectively. The gain from 2000 was from equipment salvage on one well
abandoned in a prior year. The gain from 1999 was from equipment salvage of
$12,955 on one well plugged and abandoned in a prior year, offset by a $1,473
loss on the write-off of basis on one well plugged and abandoned during 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 2000 to $434,793 as compared to $477,552
in 1999, a decrease of $42,759, or 9%. The decrease was primarily attributable
to declines in depletion, production costs and abandoned property costs, offset
by an increase in general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $347,938 in 2000 and $364,187 in 1999, resulting in a
decrease of $16,249, or 4%. Lease operating costs and production taxes declined
12% which was attributable to the Reversionary Interest change, offset by an 8%
increase in production costs resulting from high production taxes due to higher
oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate
well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
79%, from $18,776 in 1999 to
5
$33,521 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing
general partner $27,424 in 2000 and $8,400 in 1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of
the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by the Partnership. The
managing general partner determines the allocated expenses based upon the level
of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities of the
managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent over the
past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect changes in
Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Depletion was $53,334 in 2000 as compared to $79,975 in 1999, a decrease of
$26,641, or 33%. This decrease was primarily due to a 51,092 barrels of oil
increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity prices.
Abandoned property costs of $14,614 incurred in 1999 were related to the
temporary abandonment of one well during 1999 and two wells plugged and
abandoned in prior years.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 18% to $625,861 from
$532,606 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 24,976 barrels of oil,
10,794 barrels of NGLs and 48,774 mcf of gas were sold, or 43,899 BOEs. In 1998,
29,481 barrels of oil, 11,315 barrels of NGLs and 50,220 mcf of gas were sold,
or 49,166 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $4.39, or 34%, from
$13.05 in 1998 to $17.44 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.74, or 57%, from $6.58 in 1998 to $10.32 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 11% from $1.46 in 1998 to $1.62 in 1999.
Gain on disposition of assets of $11,482 was recognized in 1999 from equipment
salvage of $12,955 on one well plugged and abandoned in a prior year, offset by
a $1,473 loss on the write-off of basis on one well plugged and abandoned during
1999. In 1998, $4,248 gain on disposition of assets was recognized from proceeds
received from equipment salvage on wells plugged in prior years.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $477,552 as compared to $659,670
in 1998, a decrease of $182,118, or 28%. The decrease was primarily attributable
to declines in depletion, the impairment of oil and gas properties, production
costs and abandoned property costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $364,187 in 1999 and $385,648 in 1998, resulting in a
$21,461 decrease, or 6%. The decrease was the result of declines in well
maintenance costs, ad valorem taxes and workover expenses.
During this period, G&A increased 18% from $15,978 in 1998 to $18,776 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $8,400 in
1999 and $9,662 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
6
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $35,017 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $79,975 in 1999 compared to $206,289 in 1998, a decrease of
$126,314, or 61%. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in proved
reserves of 180,622 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher commodity
prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken
in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in
oil production of 4,505 barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared
to the same period in 1998.
Abandoned property costs of $14,614 incurred in 1999 were related to the
temporary abandonment of one well during 1999 and two wells plugged and
abandoned in prior years. Expenses of $16,738 were incurred in 1998 to plug and
abandon one oil and gas well which was temporarily abandoned in a prior year.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
7
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $392,559 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $359,902 and declines in production costs paid of
$16,249, abandoned property costs paid of $14,614 and working capital of
$16,539, offset by an increase in G&A expenses paid of $14,745. The increase in
oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2000
which contributed an additional $431,139 to oil and gas receipts, offset by
$71,237 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The decrease in
production costs was primarily due to the Reversionary Interest change, offset
by higher production taxes associated with high oil and gas prices and
additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production. The
increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 1999 were primarily for
expenditures related to upgrades of equipment on various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds of $13,943 and $12,956 were recognized during 2000 and 1999,
respectively, from equipment salvage on wells abandoned in prior years.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $591,935, of which $5,919 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $586,016 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $172,065, of which
$1,660 was distributed to the managing general partner and $170,405 to the
limited partners.
8
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd.:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 14
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 15
9
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
87-B, Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of
operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
10
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
------------ ------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 19,277 $ 21,724
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 194,002 164,577
---------- ----------
Total current assets 213,279 186,301
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on
the successful efforts accounting method 4,829,203 4,837,591
Accumulated depletion (4,181,937) (4,131,342)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 647,266 706,249
---------- ----------
$ 860,545 $ 892,550
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 20,375 $ 23,066
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 8,661 8,954
Limited partners (12,191 interests) 831,509 860,530
---------- ----------
840,170 869,484
$ 860,545 $ 892,550
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 982,604 $ 625,861 $ 532,606
Interest 6,516 3,357 4,078
Gain on disposition of assets 8,294 11,482 4,248
--------- --------- ---------
997,414 640,700 540,932
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 347,938 364,187 385,648
General and administrative 33,521 18,776 15,978
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 35,017
Depletion 53,334 79,975 206,289
Abandoned property - 14,614 16,738
--------- --------- ---------
434,793 477,552 659,670
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 562,621 $ 163,148 $(118,738)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 5,626 $ 1,631 $ (1,187)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 556,995 $ 161,517 $(117,551)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership
interest $ 45.69 $ 13.25 $ (9.64)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 11,934 $1,186,985 $1,198,919
Distributions (1,764) (200,016) (201,780)
Net loss (1,187) (117,551) (118,738)
---------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 8,983 869,418 878,401
Distributions (1,660) (170,405) (172,065)
Net income 1,631 161,517 163,148
---------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 8,954 860,530 869,484
Distributions (5,919) (586,016) (591,935)
Net income 5,626 556,995 562,621
---------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 8,661 $ 831,509 $ 840,170
========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 562,621 $ 163,148 $ (118,738)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on disposition of assets (8,294) (11,482) (4,248)
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 35,017
Depletion 53,334 79,975 206,289
Changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable (29,425) (75,008) 65,047
Accounts payable (2,691) 26,353 (42,242)
--------- --------- ----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 575,545 182,986 141,125
--------- --------- ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas equipment - (12,012) (8,617)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 13,943 12,956 4,248
--------- --------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 13,943 944 (4,369)
--------- --------- ----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (591,935) (172,065) (201,780)
--------- --------- ----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (2,447) 11,865 (65,024)
Cash at beginning of year 21,724 9,859 74,883
--------- ------- ----------
Cash at end of year $ 19,277 $ 21,724 $ 9,859
========= ========= ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1987 under the laws of the State of Texas. The
Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas production in Texas and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
15
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and gas
properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline
in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of its
oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on proved
reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $35,017 related to its
proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
16
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $838,681 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income (loss) per Federal income tax returns for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 562,621 $ 163,148 $(118,738)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes (greater than) less than
amounts for financial reporting purposes (39,072) 7,412 (59,976)
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 35,017
Abandoned property dispositions for tax reporting
greater than (less than) amounts for financial
reporting purposes - - (218,079)
Other, net 4,370 (7,638) 3,376
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) per Federal income tax
returns $ 527,919 $ 162,922 $(358,400)
======== ======== ========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Property acquisition costs $ - $ (2,313) $ 6,754
======== ======== ========
Development costs $ - $ 4,136 $ 1,863
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------- ----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 3,288,184 $ 3,289,170
Completed wells and equipment 1,541,019 1,548,421
--------- ----------
4,829,203 4,837,591
Accumulated depletion (4,181,937) (4,131,342)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 647,266 $ 706,249
========= ==========
17
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 121,257 $ 137,769 $ 144,149
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 27,424 $ 8,400 $ 9,662
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Producing Properties 87-B Employees ("EMPL") and the Partnership are parties
to the Program agreement. EMPL is a general partnership organized for the
benefit of certain employees of Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on
December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
--------------- -----------
Revenues:
Revenues from oil and gas production, proceeds from
sales of producing properties and all other
revenues:
Before payout 4.040405% 95.959595%
After payout (2) 19.191920% 80.808080%
Costs and expenses:
Property acquisition costs, operating costs, general
and administrative expenses and other costs:
Before payout 4.040405% 95.959595%
After payout (2) 19.191920% 80.808080%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 196 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The Partnership reached payout in April 2000.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
18
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ---------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 419,589 664,089
Revisions (95,538) (99,794)
Production (40,796) (50,220)
---------- ---------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 283,255 514,075
Revisions 292,082 490,347
Production (35,770) (48,774)
---------- ---------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 539,567 955,648
Revisions 31,315 (45,195)
Production (33,115) (49,380)
---------- ---------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 537,767 861,073
========== =========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net revenues
of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.63 per
barrel of oil, $13.33 per barrel of NGLs and $7.67 per mcf of gas, discounted at
10% was approximately $4,413,000 and undiscounted was $9,495,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 18,453 $ 13,256 $ 3,115
Future production costs (8,958) (7,154) (2,221)
-------- -------- --------
9,495 6,102 894
10% annual discount factor (5,082) (3,024) (335)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 4,413 $ 3,078 $ 559
========= ========= ========
19
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (635) $ (262) $ (147)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,865 1,419 (1,151)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 168 2,042 (144)
Accretion of discount 308 56 185
Changes in production rates, timing and other (371) (736) (32)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,335 2,519 (1,289)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 3,078 559 1,848
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 4,413 $ 3,078 $ 559
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 32% 37% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 22% 23% -
Phillips Petroleum Company 20% 10% 9%
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 58%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 6% 7% 23%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.,
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and Phillips Petroleum Company were $25,204, $31,416 and
$21,019, respectively, which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable -
oil and gas sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
20
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing general partner and
operator of the Partnership's properties, all production expenses are
incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The majority of the
Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly by the
Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is initially
received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership. Under the
limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of the
Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $6,095,500.
Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial
Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses allocated to the
limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs and
expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the extent its
share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
21
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of Texas
with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
22
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until August 1997.
From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October 1996,
he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From June 1988
to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
23
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA pays 1% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated 1% of the Program's
revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 196 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
24
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $121,257 $ 137,769 $144,149
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 27,424 $ 8,400 $ 9,662
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
25
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
26
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING
PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
Dated: March 29, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
-----------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 29, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
27
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited -
Partnership of Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 87-B, Ltd. incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3a of Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
4(a) Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parker & -
Parsley Producing Properties 87-B, Ltd. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit A of Amendment No. 1
of the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
4(b) Subscription Agreement incorporated by -
reference to Exhibit C of Amendment No. 1
of the Partnership's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference -
to Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4c of the Partnership's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
10(b) Program Agreement incorporated by reference -
to Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-11193)
28
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 87-B, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 435,162 $ 469,537 $ 982,604 $ 625,861 $ 532,606 $ 846,163 $ 980,232
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 35,017 $ 317,255 $ 42,277
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 197,288 $ 255,323 $ 562,621 $ 163,148 $ (118,738) $ (142,439) $ 303,380
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,973 $ 2,553 $ 5,626 $ 1,631 $ (1,187) $ (1,424) $ 3,034
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 195,315 $ 252,770 $ 556,995 $ 161,517 $ (117,551) $ (141,015) $ 300,346
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 16.02 $ 20.73 $ 45.69 $ 13.25 $ (9.64) $ (11.57) $ 24.64
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 13.77 $ 21.59 $ 48.07 $ 13.98 $ 16.41 $ 39.20 $ 35.59
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 886,112 $ 881,242 $ 860,545 $ 892,550 $ 878,401 $1,241,161 $1,823,614
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
Private Investment 87, Ltd. and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated
October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 10,480
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 16,514
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 2,600
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 248.07
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for 3.63 times
the past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 152.52
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 144.05
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 230.82
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 240.60
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 177
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion must be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the partnership.
Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved by the
limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP
of Wilmington, Delaware, and Arter & Hadden LLP of Dallas, Texas (as to matters
of Texas law) for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on behalf of the
limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an approval of
that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is attached as
an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2037, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 312,648 $ 94,943
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 157,371 169,256
---------- ----------
Total current assets 470,019 264,199
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 7,223,861 7,234,802
Accumulated depletion (6,005,470) (5,959,961)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,218,391 1,274,841
---------- ----------
$ 1,688,410 $ 1,539,040
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable:
Affiliate 25,192 14,344
Other 48,900 -
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities 74,092 14,344
---------- ----------
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 15,899 15,002
Limited partners (262 interests) 1,598,419 1,509,694
---------- ----------
1,614,318 1,524,696
---------- ----------
$ 1,688,410 $ 1,539,040
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 267,604 $ 209,122 $ 562,276 $ 450,055
Interest 1,905 2,713 4,089 4,619
Gain on disposition of assets - 262 - 15,200
-------- -------- -------- --------
269,509 212,097 566,365 469,874
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 111,039 96,847 222,273 201,495
General and administrative 6,918 6,274 14,619 13,502
Depletion 24,615 17,477 45,509 39,251
-------- -------- -------- --------
142,572 120,598 282,401 254,248
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 126,937 $ 91,499 $ 283,964 $ 215,626
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,270 $ 915 $ 2,840 $ 2,156
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 125,667 $ 90,584 $ 281,124 $ 213,470
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 479.64 $ 345.74 $1,072.99 $ 814.77
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 15,002 $1,509,694 $1,524,696
Distributions (1,943) (192,399) (194,342)
Net income 2,840 281,124 283,964
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 15,899 $1,598,419 $1,614,318
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 283,964 $ 215,626
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 45,509 39,251
Gain on disposition of assets - (15,200)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 11,885 31,807
Accounts payable 59,748 10,825
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 401,106 282,309
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Addition to oil and gas properties (2,766) (8,504)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 13,707 25,096
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities 10,941 16,592
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (194,342) (272,447)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 217,705 26,454
Cash at beginning of period 94,943 134,914
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 312,648 $ 161,368
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. (the "Partnership") was organized
in 1987 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Texas limited partnership in 1989.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 25% to $562,276 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $450,055 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
6
and NGLs and an increase in production, offset by a decline in average prices
received for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 13,100 barrels of oil,
5,041 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 25,756 mcf of gas were sold,
or 22,434 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 11,148 barrels of oil, 5,758 barrels of NGLs and 23,896 mcf of gas were
sold, or 20,889 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $1.15, or 4%, from $28.16
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.01 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.57, or 18%, from
$14.34 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.91 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 113% from $2.24
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.78 in 2001. The market price for
oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and management
expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable future.
The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at average
prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended June 30,
2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $15,200 was recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 resulting from equipment credits received on one fully
depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $282,401 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $254,248 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$28,153, or 11%. This increase was due to increases in production costs,
depletion and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $222,273 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$201,495 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $20,778 increase, or 10%.
The increase was due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred
to stimulate well production and higher production taxes due to higher gas and
NGL prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
8%, from $13,502 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $14,619 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $45,509 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$39,251 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $6,258, or 16%. This
increase was due to an increase in oil production of 1,952 barrels for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 28% to $267,604 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $209,122 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs and an increase in production, offset by a decline in average prices
received for oil. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 6,252 barrels of
oil, 3,003 barrels of NGLs and 14,371 mcf of gas were sold, or 11,650 BOEs. For
the three months ended June 30, 2000, 4,518 barrels of oil, 3,059 barrels of
NGLs and 12,350 mcf of gas were sold, or 9,635 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $2.84, or 10%, from
$29.73 for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.89 for the three months
ended June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased
$1.17, or 8%, from $13.97 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.14
for the same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased
45% to $3.76 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.60 during the
same period in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $262 was recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $142,572 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $120,598 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$21,974, or 18%. This increase was due to increases in production costs,
depletion and G&A.
Production costs were $111,039 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$96,847 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $14,192 increase, or 15%.
This increase was due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred
to stimulate well production and higher production taxes due to higher gas and
NGL prices.
During this period, G&A increased 10%, from $6,274 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $6,918 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a higher
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $24,615 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 compared to
$17,477 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $7,138, or 41%. This
increase was attributable to an increase in oil production of 1,734 barrels for
the three months ended June 30, 2001 compared to the same period in 2000.
8
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $118,797 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $111,691 and a
reduction in working capital of $29,001, offset by increases in production costs
of $20,778 and G&A expenses of $1,117. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from an increase in gas and NGL prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $75,534 to oil and gas receipts and $48,968 resulting from the
increase in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000,
offset by a decline of $12,811 due to decreased oil prices during 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in production costs was
primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production and increased production taxes associated with higher
gas and NGL prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in
audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 were for expenditures related to oil and gas equipment upgrades on
various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $13,707 and $25,096 recognized during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The proceeds recognized
during the period in 2001 were from equipment credits received on a temporarily
abandoned well. The proceeds recognized during the period in 2000 consisted of
$15,200 from equipment credits on one fully depleted well and $9,896 from
credits on one active property.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$194,342, of which $1,943 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$192,399 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $272,447, of which $2,724 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $269,723 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
9
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd.
(A Texas Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87,
Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations,
partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 87, Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 94,943 $ 134,914
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 169,256 89,852
------------ -------------
Total current assets 264,199 224,766
------------ -------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 7,234,802 7,222,781
Accumulated depletion (5,959,961) (5,880,941)
------------ -------------
Net oil and gas properties 1,274,841 1,341,840
------------ -------------
$ 1,539,040 $ 1,566,606
============= ==============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 14,344 $ 6,764
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 15,002 15,353
Limited partners (262 interests) 1,509,694 1,544,489
------------ -------------
1,524,696 1,559,842
------------ -------------
$ 1,539,040 $ 1,566,606
============= ==============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $1,035,947 $ 674,794 $ 568,014
Interest 10,943 5,922 6,840
Gain on disposition of assets 15,201 20,924 --
Miscellaneous income -- -- 27,020
---------- ---------- ----------
1,062,091 701,640 601,874
---------- ---------- ----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 395,308 333,765 357,125
General and administrative 31,079 20,244 17,041
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 176,587
Depletion 79,020 123,063 259,349
Abandoned property -- 20,129 --
---------- ---------- ----------
505,407 497,201 810,102
---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 556,684 $ 204,439 $ (208,228)
========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 5,567 $ 2,044 $ (2,082)
========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 551,117 $ 202,395 $ (206,146)
========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 2,103.50 $ 772.50 $ (786.82)
========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
------------- -------------- ---------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 20,565 $ 2,060,412 $ 2,080,977
Distributions (2,592) (256,549) (259,141)
Net loss (2,082) (206,146) (208,228)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 15,891 1,597,717 1,613,608
Distributions (2,582) (255,623) (258,205)
Net income 2,044 202,395 204,439
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 15,353 1,544,489 1,559,842
Distributions (5,918) (585,912) (591,830)
Net income 5,567 551,117 556,684
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 15,002 $ 1,509,694 $ 1,524,696
============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 556,684 $ 204,439 $ (208,228)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 79,020 123,063 259,349
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 176,587
Gain on disposition of assets (15,201) (20,924) -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (79,404) (19,909) 44,227
Accounts payable 7,580 7,671 (37,011)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 548,679 294,340 234,924
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (12,021) (1,457) (6,173)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 15,201 17,049 6,923
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by investing activities 3,180 15,592 750
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (591,830) (258,205) (259,141)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (39,971) 51,727 (23,467)
Cash at beginning of year 134,914 83,187 106,654
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash at end of year $ 94,943 $ 134,914 $ 83,187
============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A Texas Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 87, Ltd. (the "Partnership") was
organized in 1987 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas
and was converted to a Texas limited partnership in 1989. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted and the timing
of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $176,587 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $72,098 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 556,684 $ 204,439 $ (208,228)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 73,725 118,474 253,944
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 176,587
Salvage income - - 6,923
Other, net 8,468 (6,345) 1,789
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 638,877 $ 316,568 $ 231,015
============ ============ ============
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Development costs $ 12,021 $ 1,457 $ 6,173
=========== ============ ============
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 235,953 $ 235,953
Completed wells and equipment 6,998,849 6,986,828
------------- ------------
7,234,802 7,222,781
Accumulated depletion (5,959,961) (5,880,941)
------------- ------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,274,841 $ 1,341,840
============== =============
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 168,618 $ 164,154 $ 169,530
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 27,190 $ 13,954 $ 13,315
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA
and the Partnership are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
--------------- -------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
-------------------- -------------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 593,108 749,623
Revisions (204,355) (192,689)
Production (42,801) (58,036)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 345,952 498,898
Revisions 377,937 584,604
Production (40,495) (52,874)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 683,394 1,030,628
Revisions 114,936 (13,239)
Production (35,242) (48,307)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 763,088 969,082
============ ============
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.67 per barrel of NGLs and $7.76 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $5,193,000 and undiscounted was $12,461,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 24,836 $ 16,945 $ 3,765
Future production costs (12,375) (9,216) (2,895)
------------- ------------ -------------
12,461 7,729 870
10% annual discount factor (7,268) (3,837) (277)
------------- ------------ -------------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 5,193 $ 3,892 $ 593
============== ============= ==============
11
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (641) $ (341) $ (211)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,940 2,019 (1,560)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 766 2,931 (262)
Accretion of discount 389 59 244
Changes in production rates, timing and other (1,153) (1,369) (59)
------------- ------------ ------------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,301 3,299 (1,848)
------------- ------------ -------------
Balance, beginning of year 3,892 593 2,441
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, end of year $ 5,193 $ 3,892 $ 593
============== ============= =============
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil and
gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10% of
total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 42% 40% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 46%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 5% 23%
Phillips Petroleum Company 17% 16% 13%
NGTS LLC 10% 8% 1%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing,
L.P., Phillips Petroleum Company and NGTS LLC were $34,772, $27,567 and $3,043,
respectively, which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and
gas sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being
12
paid to the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the
managing general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. The managing general partner is also
responsible for 1% of the guaranty and loan commitment fees. In return,
it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $10,480,000.
Contributions aggregating $2,822,500 were received directly from the
partners in cash and the remainder was made available to the limited
partners by a financial institution. Pioneer USA is required to
contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership capital less
commission and organization and offering costs allocated to the limited
partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs and expenses
allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the extent its share
of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
(A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 54% to $1,035,947 for 2000 as
compared to $674,794 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 24,016
barrels of oil, 11,226 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 48,307 mcf of
gas were sold, or 43,293 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 27,432
barrels of oil, 13,063 barrels of NGLs and 52,874 mcf of gas were sold, or
49,307 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.74, or 76%, from
$16.82 in 1999 to $29.56 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.76, or 72%, from $9.41 in 1999 to $16.17 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 75% from $1.71 in 1999 to $2.99 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $15,201 during 2000 was attributable to salvage
income received on two wells plugged and abandoned during 1999. Gain on
disposition of assets of $20,924 during 1999 was from salvage value received on
equipment from two wells plugged and abandoned during 1999. Abandoned property
costs of $20,129 were incurred during 1999 related to the plugging of these two
wells.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $505,407 as compared to $497,201
in 1999, an increase of $8,206, or 2%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by declines in depletion and abandoned property costs.
Production costs were $395,308 in 2000 and $333,765 in 1999, resulting in a
$61,543 increase, or 18%. The increase was due to additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production and higher production taxes.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
54% from $20,244 in 1999 to $31,079 in 2000, primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $27,190 in 2000 and $13,954 in
1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $79,020 in 2000 as compared to $123,063 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $44,043, or 36%. This decrease was primarily due to a 114,527
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a decline in oil production of 3,416 barrels for the period
ended December 31, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 19% to $674,794 from
$568,014 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 27,432 barrels of oil,
13,063 barrels of NGLs and 52,874 mcf of gas were sold, or 49,307 BOEs. In 1998,
30,005 barrels of oil, 12,796 barrels of NGLs and 58,036 mcf of gas were sold,
or 52,474 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.77, or 29%, from
$13.05 in 1998 to $16.82 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.86, or 44%, from $6.55 in 1998 to $9.41 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.59 in 1998 to $1.71 in 1999.
Gain on disposition of assets of $20,924 during 1999 was from salvage value
received on equipment from two wells plugged and abandoned during 1999.
Abandoned property costs of $20,129 were incurred during 1999 related to the
plugging of these two wells.
Miscellaneous income of $27,020 during 1998 consisted of the write-off of
amounts previously recorded as accounts payable. These amounts were set aside
until the Partnership reconciled payments for the initial capital contributions.
Once these payments were reconciled, the liability was eliminated and the cash
distributed to the partners.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $497,201 as compared to $810,102
in 1998, a decrease of $312,901, or 39%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by increases in abandoned property costs and G&A.
Production costs were $333,765 in 1999 and $357,125 in 1998, resulting in a
$23,360 decrease, or 7%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 19% from $17,041 in 1998 to $20,244 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $13,954 in
1999 and $13,315 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $176,587 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $123,063 in 1999 compared to $259,349 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $136,286, or 53%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 239,857 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $254,339 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $366,174 and a decline in abandoned property costs of
$20,129, offset by increases in production costs paid of $61,543, G&A expenses
paid of $10,835 and working capital of $59,586. The increase in oil and gas
receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2000 which
contributed an additional $510,519 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $144,345
resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The increase in production
costs was primarily due to increased production taxes associated with higher oil
and gas prices and additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well
production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the
managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on several oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $15,201 received in 2000 were related to
salvage income received on two wells plugged and abandoned during 1999. Proceeds
from asset dispositions of $17,049 received in 1999 were from equipment credits
of $10,226 received on two wells plugged and abandoned during 1999 and equipment
credits of $6,823 received on two active wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $591,830, of which $5,918 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $585,912 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $258,205, of which
$2,582 was distributed to the managing general partner and $255,623 to the
limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 87, LTD.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
--------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 562,276 $ 450,055 $1,035,947 $ 674,794 $ 568,014 $ 855,114 $1,063,902
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 176,587 $ 789,277 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 383,911
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 283,964 $ 215,626 $ 556,684 $ 204,439 $ (208,228) $ (548,407) $ 833,250
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 2,840 $ 2,156 $ 5,567 $ 2,044 $ (2,082) $ (5,484) $ 8,333
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 281,124 $ 213,470 $ 551,117 $ 202,395 $ (206,146) $ (542,923) $ 824,917
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 1,072.99 $ 814.77 $ 2,103.50 $ 772.50 $ (786.82) $(2,072.23) $ 3,148.54
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 734.35 $ 1,029.48 $ 2,236.31 $ 975.66 $ 979.19 $ 1,914.87 $ 3,562.66(a)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,688,410 $1,530,506 $1,539,040 $1,566,606 $1,622.597 $2,126,977 $3,175,422
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
----------
(a) Including litigation settlement per limited partnership interest of
$1,465.31 in 1996.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
88-A Conv., L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October
12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 3,793
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 4,250
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 923
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 246.58
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.22 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 160.19
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 150.71
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 229.03
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 239.39
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 142
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2038, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 131,616 $ 54,706
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 47,862 65,812
---------- ----------
Total current assets 179,478 120,518
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 2,966,368 2,964,986
Accumulated depletion (2,521,577) (2,502,477)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 444,791 462,509
---------- ----------
$ 624,269 $ 583,027
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 10,459 $ 5,544
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 6,210 5,847
Limited partners (3,793 interests) 607,600 571,636
---------- ----------
613,810 577,483
---------- ----------
$ 624,269 $ 583,027
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
------------------------ ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- ---------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 92,519 $ 98,008 $ 226,051 $ 187,130
Interest 978 1,158 1,935 1,998
Gain on disposition of assets - - - 76
-------- --------- -------- --------
93,497 99,166 227,986 189,204
-------- --------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 41,744 39,806 86,072 83,567
General and administrative 2,776 2,940 6,782 5,614
Depletion 9,787 6,812 19,100 14,327
-------- --------- -------- --------
54,307 49,558 111,954 103,508
-------- --------- -------- --------
Net income $ 39,190 $ 49,608 $ 116,032 $ 85,696
======== ========= ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 392 $ 496 $ 1,160 $ 857
======== ========= ======== ========
Limited partners $ 38,798 $ 49,112 $ 114,872 $ 84,839
======== ========= ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 10.23 $ 12.95 $ 30.29 $ 22.37
======== ========= ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 5,847 $ 571,636 $ 577,483
Distributions (797) (78,908) (79,705)
Net income 1,160 114,872 116,032
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 6,210 $ 607,600 $ 613,810
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 116,032 $ 85,696
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 19,100 14,327
Gain on disposition of assets - (76)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 17,950 (1,374)
Accounts payable 4,915 3,770
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 157,997 102,343
-------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,382) (1,620)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 76
-------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities (1,382) (1,544)
-------- --------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (79,705) (107,828)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 76,910 (7,029)
Cash at beginning of period 54,706 66,104
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 131,616 $ 59,075
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in 1988 as a
general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was converted to a
Delaware limited partnership in 1989.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 21% to $226,051 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $187,130 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
6
and NGLs and an increase in production, offset by lower average prices received
for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 5,145 barrels of oil, 1,881
barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 14,063 mcf of gas were sold, or
9,370 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 4,413 barrels of oil, 2,745 barrels of NGLs and 10,700 mcf of gas were
sold, or 8,941 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $2.10, or 7%, from $28.50
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.40 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.38, or 17%, from
$13.81 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.19 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 94% from $2.19 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.25 for the same period in 2001. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $76 was recognized during the six months ended
June 30, 2000 resulting from equipment credits received on one fully depleted
well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $111,954 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $103,508 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $8,446,
or 8%. This increase was due to increases in depletion, production costs and
general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $86,072 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and $83,567
for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $2,505 increase, or 3%. This
increase was due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well
production and higher production taxes due to higher oil and gas prices, offset
by lower workover costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
21% from $5,614 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $6,782 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $19,100 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$14,327 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $4,773, or 33%. This
increase was due to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices and an increase in oil production of 732
barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in
2000.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 6% to $92,519 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $98,008 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
a decrease in production, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 2,189 barrels of oil, 954
barrels of NGLs and 5,418 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,046 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 2,104 barrels of oil, 1,558 barrels of NGLs and
6,015 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,665 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $2.22, or 8%, from $29.17
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.95 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.61, or
4%, from $13.71 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.32 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 43% to
$3.65 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.55 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $54,307 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $49,558 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$4,749, or 10%. This increase was due to increases in depletion and production
costs, offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $41,744 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$39,806 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $1,938 increase, or 5%. The
increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production, offset by lower production taxes due to
lower oil prices.
During this period, G&A decreased 6% from $2,940 for the three months ended June
30, 2000 to $2,776 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a decrease in
audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $9,787 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$6,812 for the same period in 2000, an increase in depletion of $2,975, or 44%.
This increase was attributable to a decrease in proved reserves during the
period ended June 30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $55,654 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $38,858 and a
8
reduction in working capital of $20,469, offset by increases in production costs
of $2,505 and G&A expenses of $1,168. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from increases in gas and NGL prices of $28,568 and $19,630 resulting
from the increase in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in
2000, offset by a decrease of $9,340 in oil prices during 2001. The increase in
production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred
to stimulate well production and increased production taxes associated with
higher oil and gas prices, offset by lower workover costs. The increase in G&A
was primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A
being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased
oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were related to expenditures for equipment upgrades on
various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds of $76 recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2000 were from
equipment credits on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$79,705, of which $797 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$78,908 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $107,828, of which $1,078 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $106,750 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
9
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv.,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
--------------- ---------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 54,706 $ 66,104
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 65,812 47,494
------------- -------------
Total current assets 120,518 113,598
------------- -------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 2,964,986 2,962,354
Accumulated depletion (2,502,477) (2,471,979)
------------- -------------
Net oil and gas properties 462,509 490,375
------------- -------------
$ 583,027 $ 603,973
============== ==============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 5,544 $ 6,800
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 5,847 6,043
Limited partners (3,793 interests) 571,636 591,130
------------- -------------
577,483 597,173
------------- -------------
$ 583,027 $ 603,973
============== ==============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 418,514 $ 280,717 $ 227,119
Interest 4,636 2,657 2,966
Gain on disposition of assets 76 -- 1,875
Other income -- -- 29
--------- --------- ---------
423,226 283,374 231,989
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 160,855 129,227 149,228
General and administrative 12,419 8,448 6,995
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 118,823
Depletion 30,498 48,743 108,077
--------- --------- ---------
203,772 186,418 383,123
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 219,454 $ 96,956 $(151,134)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 2,195 $ 970 $ (1,511)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 217,259 $ 95,986 $(149,623)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 57.28 $ 25.31 $ (39.45)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 8,622 $ 846,560 $ 855,182
Distributions (1,069) (105,839) (106,908)
Net loss (1,511) (149,623) (151,134)
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 6,042 591,098 597,140
Distributions (969) (95,954) (96,923)
Net income 970 95,986 96,956
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 6,043 591,130 597,173
Distributions (2,391) (236,753) (239,144)
Net income 2,195 217,259 219,454
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 5,847 $ 571,636 $ 577,483
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 219,454 $ 96,956 $(151,134)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 118,823
Depletion 30,498 48,743 108,077
Gain on disposition of assets (76) -- (1,875)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (18,318) (25,396) 25,872
Accounts payable (1,256) 1,462 (4,318)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 230,302 121,765 95,445
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (2,632) (3,474) (5,091)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 76 -- 4,856
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (2,556) (3,474) (235)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (239,144) (96,923) (106,908)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (11,398) 21,368 (11,698)
Cash at beginning of year 66,104 44,736 56,434
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 54,706 $ 66,104 $ 44,736
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in
1988 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1989. The Partnership's managing
general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $118,823 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $78,614 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements
of operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 219,454 $ 96,956 $ (151,134)
Depletion and depreciation amounts for tax
reporting purposes less than provisions for
financial reporting purposes 27,183 45,310 104,973
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 118,823
Other, net (622) (961) 4,070
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 246,015 $ 141,305 $ 76,732
============ ============ ============
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Development costs $ 2,632 $ 3,474 $ 5,091
============= ============ ===========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 143,766 $ 143,766
Completed wells and equipment 2,821,220 2,818,588
------------- -------------
2,964,986 2,962,354
Accumulated depletion (2,502,477) (2,471,979)
------------- -------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 462,509 $ 490,375
============== ==============
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 64,830 $ 62,056 $ 63,244
Reimbursement of general and administrative expenses $ 10,947 $ 5,872 $ 5,659
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. and the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties
to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
----------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 50 limited partner
interests owned by Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley
88-A, L.P. is 22.674558% and 77.325442%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
--------------- ----------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 245,336 365,368
Revisions (90,082) (90,310)
Production (16,899) (25,367)
-------------- --------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 138,355 249,691
Revisions 118,130 203,398
Production (17,052) (27,417)
-------------- --------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 239,433 425,672
Revisions 3,043 (86,940)
Production (14,604) (21,399)
-------------- --------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 227,872 317,333
============== ==============
10
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $12.95 per barrel of NGLs and $7.75 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $1,723,000 and undiscounted was $3,515,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 7,404 $ 5,900 $ 1,511
Future production costs (3,889) (3,311) (1,087)
------- ------- -------
3,515 2,589 424
10% annual discount factor (1,792) (1,238) (161)
------- ------- -------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 1,723 $ 1,351 $ 263
======= ======= =======
11
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------------- -------------- --------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (258) $ (151) $ (78)
Net changes in prices and production costs 694 658 (635)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (75) 786 (131)
Accretion of discount 135 26 104
Changes in production rates, timing and other (124) (231) (37)
------------- ------------ ------------
Change in present value of future net revenues 372 1,088 (777)
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, beginning of year 1,351 263 1,040
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, end of year $ 1,723 $ 1,351 $ 263
============== ============= =============
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil and
gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10% of
total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 54% 50% -
NGTS LLC 9% 10% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 55%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 6% 22%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $21,731, which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being
12
paid to the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the
managing general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the
Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $3,793,000. Pioneer
USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership
capital less commission and organization and offering costs allocated to
the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs
and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the
extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 49% to $418,514 for 2000 as
compared to $280,717 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 9,403
barrels of oil, 5,201 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 21,399 mcf of
gas were sold, or 18,171 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 9,977
barrels of oil, 7,075 barrels of NGLs and 27,417 mcf of gas were sold, or 21,622
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.37, or 73%, from
$16.91 in 1999 to $29.28 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.00, or 65%, from $9.30 in 1999 to $15.30 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 77% from $1.69 in 1999 to $2.99 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $76 was recognized in 2000 resulting from
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $203,772 as compared to $186,418
in 1999, an increase of $17,354, or 9%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $160,855 in 2000 and $129,227 in 1999, resulting in a
$31,628 increase, or 24%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
47% from $8,448 in 1999 to $12,419 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $10,947 in 2000 and $5,872 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $30,498 in 2000 as compared to $48,743 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $18,245, or 37%. This decrease was primarily due to a 13,403 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 24% to $280,717 from
$227,119 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received and an increase in production. In 1999, 9,977 barrels of oil, 7,075
barrels of NGLs and 27,417 mcf of gas were sold, or 21,622 BOEs. In 1998, 10,890
barrels of oil, 6,009 barrels of NGLs and 25,367 mcf of gas were sold, or 21,127
BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.32, or 24%, from
$13.59 in 1998 to $16.91 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.73, or 42%, from $6.57 in 1998 to $9.30 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.56 in 1998 to $1.69 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $1,875 was recognized during 1998 for credits
received from the disposal of oil and gas equipment on a fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $186,418 as compared to $383,123
in 1998, a decrease of $196,705, or 51%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $129,227 in 1999 and $149,228 in 1998, resulting in a
$20,001 decrease, or 13%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production taxes due to
increased oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 21% from $6,995 in 1998 to $8,448 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $5,872 in
1999 and $5,659 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $118,823 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $48,743 in 1999 compared to $108,077 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $59,334, or 55%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 72,170 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum Industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $108,537 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $139,776 and a decline in working capital of $4,360,
offset by increases in production costs paid of $31,628 and G&A expenses paid of
$3,971. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in
commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an additional $203,232 to oil and
gas receipts, offset by $63,456 resulting from the decline in production during
2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance and
workover costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was
primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on several oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $76 received during 2000 were due to
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $239,144, of which $2,391 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $236,753 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $96,923, of which
$969 was distributed to the managing general partner and $95,954 to the limited
partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A CONV., L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 226,051 $ 187,130 $ 418,514 $ 280,717 $ 227,119 $ 339,522 $ 413,924
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 118,823 $ 205,188 $ --
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 116,032 $ 85,696 $ 219,454 $ 96,956 $ (151,134) $ (97,307) $ 175,901
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,160 $ 857 $ 2,195 $ 970 $ (1,511) $ (973) $ 1,759
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 114,872 $ 84,839 $ 217,259 $ 95,986 $ (149,623) $ (96,334) $ 174,142
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 30.29 $ 22.37 $ 57.28 $ 25.31 $ (39.45) $ (25.40) $ 45.91
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 20.80 $ 28.14 $ 62.42 $ 25.30 $ 27.90 $ 50.68 $ 57.12
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 624,269 $ 585,611 $ 583,027 $ 603,973 $ 602,478 $ 864,838 $1,154,160
=========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
88-A, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 88-A, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 12,935
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 14,494
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 3,154
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 247.13
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.23 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 160.73
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 151.23
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 229.58
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 239.95
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 142
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2038, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-19659-01
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2225738
------------------------------------------ ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................. 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 456,462 $ 193,491
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 163,314 224,465
----------- -----------
Total current assets 619,776 417,956
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 10,115,996 10,111,281
Accumulated depletion (8,599,430) (8,534,409)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,516,566 1,576,872
----------- -----------
$ 2,136,342 $ 1,994,828
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 35,993 $ 18,724
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 21,246 20,003
Limited partners (12,935 interests) 2,079,103 1,956,101
----------- -----------
2,100,349 1,976,104
----------- -----------
$ 2,136,342 $ 1,994,828
=========== ===========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 315,590 $ 334,067 $ 770,951 $ 638,135
Interest 3,450 3,963 6,784 7,078
Gain on disposition of assets - - - 259
-------- -------- -------- --------
319,040 338,030 777,735 645,472
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 142,364 135,737 293,527 285,013
General and administrative 9,467 10,022 23,128 19,144
Depletion 33,264 23,217 65,021 48,798
-------- -------- -------- --------
185,095 168,976 381,676 352,955
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 133,945 $ 169,054 $ 396,059 $ 292,517
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,340 $ 1,690 $ 3,961 $ 2,925
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 132,605 $ 167,364 $ 392,098 $ 289,592
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 10.25 $ 12.94 $ 30.31 $ 22.39
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 20,003 $1,956,101 $1,976,104
Distributions (2,718) (269,096) (271,814)
Net income 3,961 392,098 396,059
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 21,246 $2,079,103 $2,100,349
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 396,059 $ 292,517
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 65,021 48,798
Gain on disposition of assets - (259)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 61,151 12,158
Accounts payable 17,269 12,758
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 539,500 365,972
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (4,715) (5,524)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 259
--------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (4,715) (5,265)
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (271,814) (367,722)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 262,971 (7,015)
Cash at beginning of period 193,491 215,801
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 456,462 $ 208,786
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 21% to $770,951 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $638,135 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs and an increase in production, offset by lower average prices received
7
for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 17,555 barrels of oil, 6,415
barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 47,966 mcf of gas were sold, or
31,964 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 15,055 barrels of oil, 9,352 barrels of NGLs and 36,489 mcf of gas were
sold, or 30,489 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $2.10, or 7%, from $28.50
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.40 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.38, or 17%, from
$13.81 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.19 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 94% from $2.19
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.25 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $259 was recognized during the six months ended
June 30, 2000 resulting from equipment credits received on one fully depleted
well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $381,676 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $352,955 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$28,721, or 8%. This increase was due to increases in depletion, production
costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $293,527 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$285,013 for the same period in 2000 resulting in an $8,514 increase, or 3%. The
increase was the result of additional well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production and higher production taxes due to higher oil and gas
prices, offset by lower workover costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
21% from $19,144 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $23,128 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $65,021 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$48,798 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $16,223, or 33%. This
increase was due to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices and an increase in oil production of
2,500 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
8
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 6% to $315,590 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $334,067 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
a decrease in production, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 7,473 barrels of oil, 3,259
barrels of NGLs and 18,471 mcf of gas were sold, or 13,811 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 7,177 barrels of oil, 5,284 barrels of NGLs and
20,502 mcf of gas were sold, or 15,878 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $2.22, or 8%, from $29.17
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.95 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.61, or 4%, from $13.71
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.32 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 43% from $2.55 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.65 for the same period in 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $185,095 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $168,976 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$16,119, or 10%. This increase was due to increases in depletion and production
costs, offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $142,364 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$135,737 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $6,627 increase, or 5%. The
increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production, offset by lower production taxes due to
lower oil prices.
During this period, G&A decreased 6% from $10,022 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $9,467 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a decrease
in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $33,264 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$23,217 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $10,047, or 43%. This
increase was due to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $173,528 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was primarily due to an increase of $132,522 in oil and gas sales
receipts and a reduction in working capital of $53,504, offset by increases in
production costs of $8,514 and G&A expenses of $3,984. The increase in oil and
gas receipts resulted from increases in gas and NGL prices of $97,373 and
$67,182 resulting from an increase in production during 2001 as compared to the
same period in 2000, offset by a decrease of $32,033 in oil prices during 2001.
9
The increase in production costs was primarily due to additional well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production and increased production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by lower workover costs.
The increase in G&A was primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing
general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as
a result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax
fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were related to expenditures for oil and gas equipment
upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $259 received during the six months ended
June 30, 2000 were due to equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$271,814, of which $2,718 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$269,096 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $367,722, of which $3,677 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $364,045 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
10
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 6, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
---------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-19659-01
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2225738
------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$12,762,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 12,935.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 12,935 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segments other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 54% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and
2
ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that could expose the
Partnership to substantial liability due to pollution and other environmental
damages. Although the Partnership believes that its business operations do not
impair environmental quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable
environmental regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot
predict what, if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its
current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located in
the Spraberry Trend area of West Texas were acquired by the Partnership,
resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 40 oil and gas
wells. At December 31, 2000, 39 wells were producing with one well plugged and
abandoned.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 12,935 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 981 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations, are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $807,385 and $327,220, respectively,
of such revenue-related distributions were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 1,428,374 $ 957,278 $ 774,533 $ 1,157,862 $ 1,411,568
========== ========= ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ - $ - $ 405,308 $ 699,976 $ -
========== ========= ========== ========= ==========
Net income (loss) $ 749,290 $ 331,033 $ (514,812) $ (331,171) $ 600,634
========== ========= ========== ========= ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 7,493 $ 3,310 $ (5,148) $ (3,312) $ 6,006
========== ========= ========== ========= ==========
Limited partners $ 741,797 $ 327,723 $ (509,664) $ (327,859) $ 594,628
========== ========= ========== ========= ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 57.35 $ 25.34 $ (39.40) $ (25.35) $ 45.97
========== ========= ========== ========= ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 62.42 $ 25.30 $ 27.90 $ 50.68 $ 57.12
========== ========= ========== ========= =========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $ 1,994,828 $ 2,065,363 $ 2,059,502 $ 2,953,618 $3,940,216
========== ========== ========== ========== =========
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 49% to $1,428,374 for 2000 as
compared to $957,278 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decrease in production. In 2000, 32,063
barrels of oil, 17,745 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 72,965 mcf of
gas were sold, or 61,969 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 34,020
barrels of oil, 24,121 barrels of NGLs and 93,498 mcf of gas were sold, or
73,724 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.37, or 73%, from
$16.91 in 1999 to $29.28 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.00, or 65%, from $9.30 in 1999 to $15.30 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 77% from $1.69 in 1999 to $2.99 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $259 was recognized in 2000 resulting from
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $695,576 as compared to $635,628
in 1999, an increase of $59,948, or 9%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $548,561 in 2000 and $440,670 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $107,891, or 24%. The increase was primarily due to additional well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production and higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
50% from $28,692 in 1999 to $42,987 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $37,340 in 2000 and $20,027 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $104,028 in 2000 as compared to $166,266 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $62,238, or 37%. This decrease was primarily due to a 45,809 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 24% to $957,278 from
$774,533 in 1998.
5
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received and an
increase in production. In 1999, 34,020 barrels of oil, 24,121 barrels of NGLs
and 93,498 mcf of gas were sold, or 73,724 BOEs. In 1998, 37,135 barrels of oil,
20,500 barrels of NGLs and 86,501 mcf of gas were sold, or 72,052 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.32, or 24%, from
$13.59 in 1998 to $16.91 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.73, or 42%, from $6.57 in 1998 to $9.30 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.56 in 1998 to $1.69 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $6,393 was recognized in 1998 for credits
received from the disposal of oil and gas equipment on a fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $635,628 as compared to $1,306,368
in 1998, a decrease of $670,740, or 51%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A expenses.
Production costs were $440,670 in 1999 and $508,919 in 1998, resulting in a
$68,249 decrease, or 13%. The decrease was due to reductions in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production taxes due to
increased oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 22% from $23,611 in 1998 to $28,692 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $20,027 in
1999 and $19,297 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $405,308 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $166,266 in 1999 compared to $368,530 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $202,264, or 55%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 246,048 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but
6
to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During 1999 and
2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and certain
other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned export
volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the announced
reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil prices, as have
overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North American natural gas
prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment and stable field
service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001, there is no
assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable level or
that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which could
negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $401,553 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $477,946 and a decline in working capital of $45,793,
offset by increases in production costs paid of $107,891 and G&A expenses paid
of $14,295. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in
commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an additional $694,183 to oil and
gas receipts, offset by $216,237 resulting from the decline in production during
2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance and
workover costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was
primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to
expenditures for oil and gas equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $259 received in 2000 were due to equipment
credits received on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $815,540, of which $8,155 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $807,385 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $330,525, of which
$3,305 was distributed to the managing general partner and $327,220 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.:
Independent Auditors' Report...................................................... 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999................................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998............................................................. 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................ 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998............................................................. 13
Notes to Financial Statements..................................................... 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---------- ----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 193,491 $ 215,801
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 224,465 177,635
---------- ----------
Total current assets 417,956 393,436
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 10,111,281 10,102,308
Accumulated depletion (8,534,409) (8,430,381)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,576,872 1,671,927
---------- ----------
$ 1,994,828 $ 2,065,363
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 18,724 $ 23,009
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 20,003 20,665
Limited partners (12,935 interests) 1,956,101 2,021,689
---------- ----------
1,976,104 2,042,354
---------- ----------
$ 1,994,828 $ 2,065,363
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $1,428,374 $ 957,278 $ 774,533
Interest 16,233 9,383 10,531
Gain on disposition of assets 259 - 6,393
Other - - 99
--------- --------- ---------
1,444,866 966,661 791,556
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 548,561 440,670 508,919
General and administrative 42,987 28,692 23,611
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 405,308
Depletion 104,028 166,266 368,530
--------- --------- ---------
695,576 635,628 1,306,368
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 749,290 $ 331,033 $ (514,812)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 7,493 $ 3,310 $ (5,148)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 741,797 $ 327,723 $ (509,664)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership
interest $ 57.35 $ 25.34 $ (39.40)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
-------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 29,454 $ 2,891,783 $ 2,921,237
Distributions (3,646) (360,933) (364,579)
Net loss (5,148) (509,664) (514,812)
-------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 20,660 2,021,186 2,041,846
Distributions (3,305) (327,220) (330,525)
Net income 3,310 327,723 331,033
-------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 20,665 2,021,689 2,042,354
Distributions (8,155) (807,385) (815,540)
Net income 7,493 741,797 749,290
-------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 20,003 $ 1,956,101 $ 1,976,104
======== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 749,290 $ 331,033 $(514,812)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 405,308
Depletion 104,028 166,266 368,530
Gain on disposition of assets (259) - (6,393)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (46,830) (102,261) 78,333
Accounts payable (4,285) 5,353 (14,725)
-------- --------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 801,944 400,391 316,241
-------- --------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (8,973) (11,847) (17,362)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 259 - 16,559
-------- --------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities (8,714) (11,847) (803)
-------- --------- --------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (815,540) (330,525) (364,579)
-------- --------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (22,310) 58,019 (49,141)
Cash at beginning of year 215,801 157,782 206,923
-------- --------- --------
Cash at end of year $ 193,491 $ 215,801 $ 157,782
======== ========= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and gas
properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline
in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of its
oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on proved
reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $405,308 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $267,761 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
15
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 749,290 $ 331,033 $ (514,812)
Depletion and depreciation for tax reporting
purposes less than provisions for financial
reporting purposes 92,722 154,558 357,942
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 405,308
Other, net (2,176) (2,693) 13,320
-------- -------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 839,836 $ 482,898 $ 261,758
======== ======== =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
Development costs $ 8,973 $ 11,847 $ 17,362
======== ========= ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------- ----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 490,279 $ 490,279
Completed wells and equipment 9,621,002 9,612,029
---------- ----------
10,111,281 10,102,308
Accumulated depletion (8,534,409) (8,430,381)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,576,872 $ 1,671,927
========== ==========
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- ---------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 221,084 $ 211,623 $ 215,684
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 37,340 $ 20,027 $ 19,297
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
Parker & Parsley 88-A Conv., L.P. and the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are
parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
---------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 173 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 88-A
Conv., L.P. is 77.325442% and 22.674558%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------- -----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 836,39 1,245,602
Revisions (307,084) (307,863)
Production (57,635) (86,501)
------------- -----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 471,675 851,238
Revisions 402,731 693,436
Production (58,141) (93,498)
------------- -----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 816,265 1,451,176
Revisions 10,578 (296,099)
Production (49,808) (72,965)
------------- -----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 777,035 1,082,112
============= ===========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $12.95 per barrel of NGLs and $7.75 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $5,875,000 and undiscounted was $11,988,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 25,247 $ 20,115 $ 5,153
Future production costs (13,258) (11,289) (3,707)
--------- --------- ---------
11,989 8,826 1,446
10% annual discount factor (6,114) (4,222) (550)
--------- --------- ---------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 5,875 $ 4,604 $ 896
========= ========= ========
18
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- ---------- ---------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (880) $ (517) $ (266)
Net changes in prices and production costs 2,367 2,244 (2,296)
Revisions of estimated future development costs - - (237)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (253) 2,680 (474)
Accretion of discount 460 89 355
Changes in production rates, timing and other (423) (788) 269
--------- ---------- ---------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,271 3,708 (2,649)
--------- ---------- ---------
Balance, beginning of year 4,604 896 3,545
--------- ---------- ---------
Balance, end of year $ 5,875 $ 4,604 $ 896
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 54% 50% -
NGTS LLC 9% 10% 3%
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 55%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 6% 22%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $74,114, which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general
partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all production
expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general
19
partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion
costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In
return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$12,935,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of
initial Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to
the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of Texas
with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until August 1997.
From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October 1996,
he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From June 1988
to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 25% of its operating and general
and administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated approximately
25% of the Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 173 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
23
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 221,084 $ 211,623 $ 215,684
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 37,340 $ 20,027 $ 19,297
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the required
information is in the financial statements or notes thereto, or is not
applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
Dated: March 23, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 23, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 23, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Amended and Restated Certificate and -
Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Parker & Parsley 88-A, L.P. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit A of Amendment
No. 1 of the Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-19659)
4(b) Form of Subscription Agreement and -
Power of Attorney incorporated by reference
to Exhibit D of the Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-19659) (hereinafter called the Partnership's
Registration Statement)
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
D of the Partnership's Registration Statement
10(b) Exploration and Development Program -
Agreement incorporated by reference to
Exhibit C of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-A, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 770,951 $ 638,135 $1,428,374 $ 957,278 $ 774,533 $1,157,862 $1,411,568
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 405,308 $ 699,976 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 396,059 $ 292,517 $ 749,290 $ 331,033 $ (514,812) $ (331,171) $ 600,634
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 3,961 $ 2,925 $ 7,493 $ 3,310 $ (5,148) $ (3,312) $ 6,006
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 392,098 $ 289,592 $ 741,797 $ 327,723 $ (509,664) $ (327,859) $ 594,628
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 30.31 $ 22.39 $ 57.35 $ 25.34 $ (39.40) $ (25.35) $ 45.97
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 20.80 $ 28.14 $ 62.42 $ 25.30 $ 27.90 $ 50.68 $ 57.12
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $2,136,342 $2,002,916 $1,994,828 $2,065,363 $2,059,502 $2,953,618 $3,940,216
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
88-B Conv., L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October
12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 3,636
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 4,108
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,233
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 341.05
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.55 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 152.48
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 144.77
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 318.30
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 331.00
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 145
(c), (f)
-----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2038, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 127,199 $ 58,050
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 56,185 80,619
---------- ----------
Total current assets 183,384 138,669
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 2,749,980 2,824,029
Accumulated depletion (2,364,231) (2,424,313)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 385,749 399,716
---------- ----------
$ 569,133 $ 538,385
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 9,122 $ 6,684
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 5,591 5,308
Limited partners (3,636 interests) 554,420 526,393
---------- ----------
560,011 531,701
---------- ----------
$ 569,133 $ 538,385
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
----------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
---------- ---------- --------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 116,624 $ 122,939 $ 249,201 $ 240,056
Interest 880 1,231 1,982 2,078
Gain on disposition of assets 3,190 3,592 3,190 3,592
--------- --------- -------- ---------
120,694 127,762 254,373 245,726
--------- --------- -------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 52,202 46,638 94,594 83,261
General and administrative expenses 2,916 3,575 6,230 7,202
Depletion 8,579 6,411 14,915 14,415
Abandoned property 4,159 - 4,159 -
--------- --------- -------- ---------
67,856 56,624 119,898 104,878
--------- --------- -------- ---------
Net income $ 52,838 $ 71,138 $ 134,475 $ 140,848
========= ========= ======== =========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 529 $ 711 $ 1,345 $ 1,408
========= ========= ======== =========
Limited partners $ 52,309 $ 70,427 $ 133,130 $ 139,440
========= ========= ======== =========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 14.38 $ 19.37 $ 36.61 $ 38.35
========= ========= ======== =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 5,308 $ 526,393 $ 531,701
Distributions (1,062) (105,103) (106,165)
Net income 1,345 133,130 134,475
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 5,591 $ 554,420 $ 560,011
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 134,475 $ 140,848
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 14,915 14,415
Gain on disposition of assets (3,190) (3,592)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 24,434 (12,387)
Accounts payable 3,424 3,746
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 174,058 143,030
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,184) (2,208)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 2,440 3,592
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities 1,256 1,384
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (106,165) (142,879)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 69,149 1,535
Cash at beginning of period 58,050 59,846
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 127,199 $ 61,381
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in 1988 as a
general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was converted to a
Delaware limited partnership in 1989.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Revenues:
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 4% to $249,201 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $240,056 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
6
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 5,840 barrels
of oil, 1,903 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 8,437 mcf of gas were
sold, or 9,149 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June
30, 2000, 6,703 barrels of oil, 2,606 barrels of NGLs and 10,843 mcf of gas were
sold, or 11,116 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $1.33, or 5%, from $26.91
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $28.24 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.39, or 24%, from
$14.08 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.47 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 184% from $2.12
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $6.03 in 2001. The market price for
oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and management
expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable future.
The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at average
prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended June 30,
2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $3,190 was received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 due to the sale of equipment on one well plugged and abandoned
during the current period. Abandoned property costs of $4,159 were also incurred
during the same period to plug and abandon this well. A gain of $3,592 was
recognized during the same period in 2000 from equipment credits received on one
fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $119,898 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $104,878 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$15,020, or 14%. This increase was due to increases in production costs,
abandoned property costs and depletion, offset by a decline in general and
administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $94,594 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and $83,261
for the same period in 2000, resulting in an $11,333 increase, or 14%. The
increase was due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production and higher production taxes due to higher oil and gas
prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
13% from $7,202 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $6,230 for the same
period in 2001. This decrease was due to a decline in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $14,915 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$14,415 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $500, or 3%. This increase
was due to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June 30, 2000
due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decrease in oil production of 863
barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in
2000.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 5% to $116,624 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $122,939 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
a decrease in production, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 3,097 barrels of oil, 963
barrels of NGLs and 4,937 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,883 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 3,357 barrels of oil, 1,285 barrels of NGLs and
5,144 mcf of gas were sold, or 5,499 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.56, or 2%, from $27.42
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.86 for the same period in June
30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.22, or 9%,
from $13.81 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.03 for the same
period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 50% to $3.83
during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.55 during the same period in
2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $3,190 was received during the three months
ended June 30, 2001 due to the sale of equipment on one well plugged and
abandoned during the current period. Abandoned property costs of $4,159 were
also incurred during the same period to plug and abandon this well. A gain of
$3,592 was recognized during the same period in 2000 from equipment credits
received on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $67,856 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $56,624 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$11,232, or 20%. This increase was due to increases in production costs,
abandoned property costs and depletion, offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $52,202 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$46,638 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $5,564 increase, or 12%. The
increase was due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 18% from $3,575 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $2,916 for the same period in 2001 primarily due to a lower
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues and a
decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $8,579 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$6,411 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $2,168, or 34%. This increase
was attributable to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil
production of 260 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared
to the same period in 2000.
8
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $31,028 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $9,049 and
reductions of $972 in G&A expenses and $36,499 in working capital, offset by
increases in production costs of $11,333 and abandoned property costs of $4,159.
The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity
prices during 2001 which contributed an additional $60,241 to oil and gas
receipts, offset by $51,192 resulting from the decline in production during 2001
as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in production costs was
primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production and increased production taxes associated with higher
oil and gas prices. The decrease in G&A was due to a decline in audit and tax
fees.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were related to expenditures for equipment upgrades on
various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $2,440 was recognized during the six
months ended June 30, 2001. The gain was comprised of $2,227 received from the
sale of equipment on one well plugged and abandoned during the current period
and $213 from equipment credits received on two active wells. Proceeds of $3,592
were received during the same period in 2000 from equipment credits on one fully
depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$106,165, of which $1,062 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$105,103 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $142,879, of which $1,429 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $141,450 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
9
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv.,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
-------------- --------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 58,050 $ 59,846
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 80,619 47,842
----------- -----------
Total current assets 138,669 107,688
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 2,824,029 2,894,900
Accumulated depletion (2,424,313) (2,470,345)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 399,716 424,555
----------- -----------
$ 538,385 $ 532,243
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 6,684 $ 8,672
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 5,308 5,227
Limited partners (3,636 interests) 526,393 518,344
----------- -----------
531,701 523,571
----------- -----------
$ 538,385 $ 532,243
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 535,228 $ 291,390 $ 234,942
Interest 5,043 2,697 3,084
Gain on disposition of assets 7,186 - 63
---------- ---------- ----------
547,457 294,087 238,089
---------- ---------- ----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 174,071 146,805 158,704
General and administrative 15,875 8,615 7,091
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 156,111
Depletion 27,450 42,399 114,895
Abandoned property 2,755 - -
---------- ---------- ----------
220,151 197,819 436,801
---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 327,306 $ 96,268 $ (198,712)
========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 3,273 $ 963 $ (1,987)
========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 324,033 $ 95,305 $ (196,725)
========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 89.12 $ 26.21 $ (54.10)
========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
----------- ------------ -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 8,195 $ 812,239 $ 820,434
Distributions (882) (87,329) (88,211)
Net loss (1,987) (196,725) (198,712)
---------- ----------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 5,326 528,185 533,511
Distributions (1,062) (105,146) (106,208)
Net income 963 95,305 96,268
---------- ----------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 5,227 518,344 523,571
Distributions (3,192) (315,984) (319,176)
Net income 3,273 324,033 327,306
---------- ----------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 5,308 $ 526,393 $ 531,701
========== =========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------------ ----------- -----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 327,306 $ 96,268 $ (198,712)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 156,111
Depletion 27,450 42,399 114,895
Gain on disposition of assets (7,186) - (63)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (32,777) (18,949) 10,720
Accounts payable (1,988) 1,575 (4,516)
----------- ---------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 312,805 121,293 78,435
----------- ---------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (2,611) (3,396) (6,118)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 7,186 4,369 63
----------- ---------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 4,575 973 (6,055)
----------- ---------- -----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (319,176) (106,208) (88,211)
----------- ---------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (1,796) 16,058 (15,831)
Cash at beginning of year 59,846 43,788 59,619
----------- ---------- -----------
Cash at end of year $ 58,050 $ 59,846 $ 43,788
=========== ========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in
1988 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1989. The Partnership's managing
general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the unit-of-
production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil (dominant
mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants. The
carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $156,111 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $30,771 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 327,306 $ 96,268 $ (198,712)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax reporting
purposes less than amounts for financial reporting
purposes 23,646 38,232 111,242
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 156,111
Other, net (1,011) 3,526 477
---------- ---------- ----------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 349,941 $ 138,026 $ 69,118
========== ========== ==========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Development costs $ 2,611 $ 3,396 $ 6,118
========== ========== ==========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
------------- -------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 173,265 $ 178,368
Completed wells and equipment 2,650,764 2,716,532
------------ ------------
2,824,029 2,894,900
Accumulated depletion (2,424,313) (2,470,345)
------------ ------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 399,716 $ 424,555
============ ============
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 64,694 $ 63,771 $ 61,312
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 13,920 $ 5,293 $ 5,608
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an
income tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement.
Pioneer USA, Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. and the Partnership (the
"Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA
and the Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
------------------- --------------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 20 limited partner interests
owned by Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 88-B,
L.P. is 28.880064% and 71.119936%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the
Partnership's reserves are proved developed and located within the United
States. The Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by
Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant,
using criteria established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 214,797 248,651
Revisions (87,571) (74,562)
Production (17,610) (21,214)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 109,616 152,875
Revisions 152,579 224,938
Production (16,986) (23,221)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 245,209 354,592
Revisions 46,611 24,276
Production (18,572) (21,781)
------------ ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 273,248 357,087
============ ============
10
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.59 per barrel of NGLs and $7.85 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $2,098,000 and undiscounted was $4,398,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 8,963 $ 6,119 $ 1,201
Future production costs (4,565) (3,521) (930)
----------- ----------- -----------
4,398 2,598 271
10% annual discount factor (2,300) (1,240) (85)
----------- ----------- -----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 2,098 $ 1,358 $ 186
=========== =========== ===========
11
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------- ------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (361) $ (144) $ (76)
Net changes in prices and production costs 775 595 (519)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 350 1,112 (114)
Accretion of discount 136 19 84
Changes in production rates, timing and other (160) (410) (31)
----------- ------------ -----------
Change in present value of future net revenues 740 1,172 (656)
----------- ------------ -----------
Balance, beginning of year 1,358 186 842
----------- ------------ -----------
Balance, end of year $ 2,098 $ 1,358 $ 186
=========== ============ ===========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil and
gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10% of
total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 50% 44% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 49%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 5% 17%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $25,238 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
12
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $3,636,000. Pioneer
USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership
capital less commission and organization and offering costs allocated to
the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs
and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the
extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 84% to $535,228 for 2000 as
compared to $291,390 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and an increase in production. In 2000, 13,209 barrels
of oil, 5,363 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 21,781 mcf of gas were
sold, or 22,202 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 11,400 barrels of
oil, 5,586 barrels of NGLs and 23,221 mcf of gas were sold, or 20,856 BOEs. Due
to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas properties,
management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the future until
the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.12, or 71%, from
$17.17 in 1999 to $29.29 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.99, or 60%, from $10.03 in 1999 to $16.02 in 2000. The average
price received per mcf of gas increased 69% from $1.70 in 1999 to $2.87 in 2000.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade,
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $7,186 was recognized during 2000. The gain was
comprised of $5,981 received from the sale of equipment on one well plugged and
abandoned during the current period and $1,205 from equipment credits received
on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $220,151 as compared to $197,819
in 1999, an increase of $22,332, or 11%. The increase was due to increases in
production costs, general and administrative expenses ("G&A") and abandoned
property costs, offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $174,071 in 2000 and $146,805 in 1999, resulting in a
$27,266 increase, or 19%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional workover and well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
84% from $8,615 in 1999 to $15,875 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $13,920 in 2000 and $5,293 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $27,450 in 2000 as compared to $42,399 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $14,949, or 35%. This decrease was primarily due to a 35,962 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 due to higher commodity prices,
offset by an increase in oil production of 1,809 barrels for the period ended
December 31, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999.
Abandoned property costs of $2,755 were incurred during 2000 due to the plugging
and abandonment of one well during
the current period.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 24% to $291,390 from
$234,942 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 11,400 barrels of oil,
5,586 barrels of NGLs and 23,221 mcf of gas were sold, or 20,856 BOEs. In 1998,
12,653 barrels of oil, 4,957 barrels of NGLs and 21,214 mcf of gas were sold, or
21,146 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.93, or 30%, from
$13.24 in 1998 to $17.17 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.12, or 45%, from $6.91 in 1998 to $10.03 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 9% from $1.56 in 1998 to $1.70 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $197,819 as compared to $436,801
in 1998, a decrease of $238,982, or 55%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $146,805 in 1999 and $158,704 in 1998, resulting in an
$11,899 decrease, or 7%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs, workover costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production
taxes due to increased oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 21% from $7,091 in 1998 to $8,615 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $5,293 in
1999 and $5,608 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets
to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $156,111 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $42,399 in 1999 compared to $114,895 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $72,496, or 63%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 100,955 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of 1,253
barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in
1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $191,512 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $246,184, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $27,266, G&A expenses paid of $7,260 abandoned property costs paid of $2,755
and working capital of $17,391. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted
from the increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an
additional $200,923 to oil and gas receipts and an increase of $45,261 resulting
from the increase in production during 2000. The increase in production costs
was primarily due to increased production taxes associated with higher oil and
gas prices and additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were
related to equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $7,186 were recognized during 2000. The
proceeds were comprised of $5,981 received from the sale of equipment on one
well plugged and abandoned during the current period and $1,205 from equipment
credits received on one active well. Proceeds of $4,369 during 1999 were
primarily related to equipment dispositions on one oil and gas well that is
temporarily abandoned.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $319,176, of which $3,192 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $315,984 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $106,208, of which
$1,062 was distributed to the managing general partner and $105,146 to the
limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B CONV., L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 249,201 $ 240,056 $ 535,228 $ 291,390 $ 234,942 $ 329,125 $ 427,360
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 156,111 $ 222,425 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 134,475 $ 140,848 $ 327,306 $ 96,268 $ (198,712) $ (140,168) $ 161,450
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,345 $ 1,408 $ 3,273 $ 963 $ (1,987) $ (1,402) $ 1,615
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 133,130 $ 139,440 $ 324,033 $ 95,305 $ (196,725) $ (138,766) $ 159,835
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 36.61 $ 38.35 $ 89.12 $ 26.21 $ (54.10) $ (38.16) $ 43.96
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 28.91 $ 38.90 $ 86.90 $ 28.92 $ 24.02 $ 50.67 $ 54.12
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 569,133 $ 533,958 $ 538,385 $ 532,243 $ 540,608 $ 832,047 $1,155,784
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
88-B, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 88-B, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 8,954
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 10,116
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 3,023
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 341.24
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.53 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 152.74
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 145.00
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 318.50
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 331.19
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 145
(c), (f)
-----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2038, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-19659-02
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2240121
------------------------------------------ ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
-------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000....................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000...................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001...................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements.............................. 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations...................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K........................... 11
Signatures................................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 315,293 $ 144,763
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 138,533 198,467
---------- ----------
Total current assets 453,826 343,230
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 6,772,191 6,954,545
Accumulated depletion (5,822,040) (5,969,972)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 950,151 984,573
---------- ----------
$ 1,403,977 $ 1,327,803
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 22,604 $ 16,350
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 13,783 13,083
Limited partners (8,954 interests) 1,367,590 1,298,370
---------- ----------
1,381,373 1,311,453
---------- ----------
$ 1,403,977 $ 1,327,803
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 287,569 $ 302,734 $ 613,966 $ 591,346
Interest 2,193 3,085 4,914 5,177
Gain on disposition of assets 7,855 8,845 7,855 8,845
-------- -------- -------- --------
297,617 314,664 626,735 605,368
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 128,587 114,842 233,029 205,053
General and administrative 7,189 8,802 15,349 17,740
Depletion 21,178 15,809 36,755 35,517
Abandoned property 10,241 - 10,241 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
167,195 139,453 295,374 258,310
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 130,422 $ 175,211 $ 331,361 $ 347,058
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,305 $ 1,753 $ 3,314 $ 3,471
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 129,117 $ 173,458 $ 328,047 $ 343,587
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 14.42 $ 19.37 $ 36.64 $ 38.37
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 13,083 $1,298,370 $1,311,453
Distributions (2,614) (258,827) (261,441)
Net income 3,314 328,047 331,361
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 13,783 $1,367,590 $1,381,373
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 331,361 $ 347,058
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 36,755 35,517
Gain on disposition of assets (7,855) (8,845)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 59,934 (10,351)
Accounts payable 8,682 9,046
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 428,877 372,425
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (2,916) (5,439)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 6,010 8,845
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities 3,094 3,406
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (261,441) (351,856)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 170,530 23,975
Cash at beginning of period 144,763 129,430
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 315,293 $ 153,405
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 4% to $613,966 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $591,346 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 14,397 barrels
7
of oil, 4,692 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 20,792 mcf of gas were
sold, or 22,554 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 16,511 barrels of oil, 6,423 barrels of NGLs and 26,695 mcf of
gas were sold, or 27,383 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $1.33, or 5%, from $26.91
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $28.24 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.39, or 24%, from
$14.08 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.47 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 184% from $2.12
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $6.03 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $7,855 was received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 due to the sale of equipment on one well plugged and abandoned
during the current period. Abandoned property costs of $10,241 were also
incurred during the same period to plug and abandon this well. A gain of $8,845
was recognized during the same period in 2000 resulting from equipment credits
received on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $295,374 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $258,310 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$37,064, or 14%. This increase was due to increases in production costs,
abandoned property costs and depletion, offset by a decline in general and
administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $233,029 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$205,053 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $27,976 increase, or 14%.
This increase was primarily due to additional workover and well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production and increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
13% from $17,740 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $15,349 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to decreased audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $36,755 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$35,517 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,238, or 3%. This increase
was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices, offset by a decrease in oil
production of 2,114 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared
to the same period in 2000.
8
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 5% to $287,569 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $302,734 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
a decline in production, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 7,644 barrels of oil, 2,377
barrels of NGLs and 12,161 mcf of gas were sold, or 12,048 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 8,275 barrels of oil, 3,156 barrels of NGLs and
12,676 mcf of gas were sold, or 13,544 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.56, or 2%, from $27.42
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.86 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.22, or 9%, from
$13.81 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.03 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 50% from $2.55
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.83 for the same period in
2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $7,855 was received during the three months
ended June 30, 2001 due to the sale of equipment on one well plugged and
abandoned during the current period. Abandoned property costs of $10,241 were
also incurred during the same period to plug and abandon this well. A gain of
$8,845 was recognized during the same period in 2000 resulting from equipment
credits received on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $167,195 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $139,453 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$27,742, or 20%. This increase was due to increases in production costs,
abandoned property costs and depletion, offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $128,587 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$114,842 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $13,745 increase, or 12%.
The increase was primarily due to additional workover and well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 18% from $8,802 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $7,189 for the same period in 2001 due to lower percentage of
the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of a decline in oil and gas revenues and a decrease in
audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $21,178 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$15,809 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $5,369, or 34%. This
increase was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period
ended June 30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices, offset by a decline
in oil production of 631 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000.
9
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $56,452 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was primarily due to an increase of $22,357 in oil and gas sales
receipts and reductions of $2,391 in G&A expenses and $69,921 in working
capital, offset by increases in production costs of $27,976 and abandoned
property costs of $10,241. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from
the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an additional
$147,904 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $125,547 resulting from the decline
in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase
in production costs was primarily due to additional workover and well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production and increased production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices. The decrease in G&A was
primarily due to decreased audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were for equipment upgrades on active oil and gas
properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $6,010 was recognized during the six
months ended June 30, 2001. The proceeds were comprised of $5,485 received from
the sale of equipment on one well plugged and abandoned during the current
period and $525 from equipment credits received on two active wells. Proceeds of
$8,845 recognized during the same period in 2000 were from equipment credits on
one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$261,441, of which $2,614 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$258,827 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $351,856, of which $3,519 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $348,337 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
10
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 8, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
---------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-19659-02
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2240121
------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES /X/ NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. /X/
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$8,860,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 8,954.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 8,954 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 50% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located in
the Spraberry Trend area of West Texas were acquired by the Partnership,
resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 43 oil and gas
wells. Two wells have been plugged and abandoned. At December 31, 2000, 41 wells
were producing.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 8,954 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 690 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $778,145 and $258,933, respectively,
of such revenue-related distributions were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
------------------
Oil and gas sales $1,318,092 $ 717,449 $ 578,573 $ 810,500 $1,052,408
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ - $ - $ 383,951 $ 547,793 $ -
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 805,539 $ 236,642 $ (488,631) $ (344,997) $ 397,674
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 8,055 $ 2,366 $ (4,887) $ (3,450) $ 3,977
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 797,484 $ 234,276 $ (483,744) $ (341,547) $ 393,697
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 89.06 $ 26.16 $ (54.03) $ (38.14) $ 43.97
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 86.90 $ 28.92 $ 24.02 $ 50.67 $ 54.14
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
At year end:
------------
Identifiable assets $1,327,803 $1,313,164 $1,334,302 $2,051,284 $2,848,468
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 84% to $1,318,092 for 2000 as
compared to $717,449 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and an increase in production. In 2000, 32,524 barrels
of oil, 13,205 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 53,620 mcf of gas
were sold, or 54,666 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 28,078 barrels
of oil, 13,752 NGLs and 57,190 mcf of gas were sold, or 51,362 BOEs. Due to the
decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas properties, management
expects a certain amount of decline in production in the future until the
Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.12, or 71%, from
$17.17 in 1999 to $29.29 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.99, or 60%, from $10.03 in 1999 to $16.02 in 2000. The average
price received per mcf of gas increased 69% from $1.70 in 1999 to $2.87 in 2000.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $17,697 was recognized during 2000. The gain
was comprised of $14,729 received from the sale of equipment on one well plugged
and abandoned during the current period and $2,968 from equipment credits
received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $542,703 as compared to $487,566
in 1999, an increase of $55,137, or 11%. The increase was due to increases in
production costs, general and administrative expenses ("G&A") and abandoned
property costs, offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $428,633 in 2000 and $361,482 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $67,151, or 19%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
83% from $21,650 in 1999 to $39,725 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $34,281 in 2000 and $13,039 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
Depletion was $67,561 in 2000 as compared to $104,434 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $36,873, or 35%. This decrease was primarily due to a 88,489 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices, offset by an increase in oil production of 4,446 barrels for the period
ended December 31, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999.
Abandoned property costs of $6,784 incurred in 2000 were related to the plugging
and abandonment of one well during the current year.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 24% to $717,449 from
$578,573 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 28,078 barrels of oil,
13,752 barrels of NGLs and 57,190 mcf of gas were sold, or 51,362 BOEs. In 1998,
31,155 barrels of oil, 12,210 NGLs and 52,254 mcf of gas were sold, or 52,074
BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.93, or 30%, from
$13.24 in 1998 to $17.17 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.12, or 45%, from $6.91 in 1998 to $10.03 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 9% from $1.56 in 1998 to $1.70 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $487,566 as compared to $1,075,163
in 1998, a decrease of $587,597, or 55%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $361,482 in 1999 and $390,835 in 1998, resulting in a
$29,353 decrease, or 8%. The decrease was primarily due to declines in well
maintenance costs, workover costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in
production taxes due to increased oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 25% from $17,315 in 1998 to $21,650 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $13,039 in
1999 and $13,810 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $383,951 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $104,434 in 1999 compared to $283,062 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $178,628, or 63%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 248,642 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of 3,077
barrels for the period ended
6
December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $512,129 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $606,337, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $67,151, G&A expenses paid of $18,075, abandoned property costs paid of
$6,784 and working capital of $2,198. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an
additional $495,153 to oil and gas receipts and an increase of $111,184
resulting from the increase in production during 2000. The increase in
production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes associated with
higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to
higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited
to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to the
upgrades of oil and gas equipment on active properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $17,697 were recognized during 2000. The
proceeds were comprised of $14,729 received from the sale of equipment on one
well plugged and abandoned during the current period and $2,968 from equipment
credits received on active wells. Proceeds of $10,758 recognized during 1999
were related to equipment disposals on one temporarily abandoned oil and gas
well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
7
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $786,005, of which $7,860 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $778,145 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $261,548, of which
$2,615 was distributed to the managing general partner and $258,933 to the
limited partners.
8
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 14
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 15
9
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 144,763 $ 129,430
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 198,467 138,030
----------- -----------
Total current assets 343,230 267,460
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 6,954,545 7,129,071
Accumulated depletion (5,969,972) (6,083,367)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 984,573 1,045,704
----------- -----------
$ 1,327,803 $ 1,313,164
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 16,350 $ 21,245
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 13,083 12,888
Limited partners (8,954 interests) 1,298,370 1,279,031
----------- -----------
1,311,453 1,291,919
----------- -----------
$ 1,327,803 $ 1,313,164
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $1,318,092 $ 717,449 $ 578,573
Interest 12,453 6,759 7,803
Other - - 156
Gain on disposition of assets 17,697 - -
---------- ---------- -----------
1,348,242 724,208 586,532
---------- ---------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 428,633 361,482 390,835
General and administrative 39,725 21,650 17,315
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 383,951
Depletion 67,561 104,434 283,062
Abandoned property 6,784 - -
---------- ---------- -----------
542,703 487,566 1,075,163
---------- ---------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 805,539 $ 236,642 $ (488,631)
========== ========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 8,055 $ 2,366 $ (4,887)
========== ========== ===========
Limited partners $ 797,484 $ 234,276 $ (483,744)
========== ========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 89.06 $ 26.16 $ (54.03)
========== ========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 20,196 $ 2,002,489 $ 2,022,685
Distributions (2,172) (215,057) (217,229)
Net loss (4,887) (483,744) (488,631)
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 13,137 1,303,688 1,316,825
Distributions (2,615) (258,933) (261,548)
Net income 2,366 234,276 236,642
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 12,888 1,279,031 1,291,919
Distributions (7,860) (778,145) (786,005)
Net income 8,055 797,484 805,539
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 13,083 $ 1,298,370 $ 1,311,453
======== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 805,539 $ 236,642 $(488,631)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 383,951
Depletion 67,561 104,434 283,062
Other - - (156)
Gain on disposition of assets (17,697) - -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (60,437) (66,902) 26,411
Accounts payable (4,895) 3,768 (11,122)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 790,071 277,942 193,515
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (6,430) (8,363) (15,067)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 17,697 10,758 156
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 11,267 2,395 (14,911)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (786,005) (261,548) (217,229)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 15,333 18,789 (38,625)
Cash at beginning of year 129,430 110,641 149,266
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 144,763 $ 129,430 $ 110,641
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the
15
respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation been consistent over
the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $383,951 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
16
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $77,883 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- -------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 805,539 $236,642 $(488,631)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 58,194 94,173 274,063
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 383,951
Other (2,494) 8,701 1,161
--------- -------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 861,239 $339,516 $ 170,544
========= ======== =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Development costs $ 6,430 $ 8,363 $ 15,067
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 426,682 $ 439,249
Completed wells and equipment 6,527,863 6,689,822
----------- -----------
6,954,545 7,129,071
Accumulated depletion (5,969,972) (6,083,367)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 984,573 $ 1,045,704
=========== ===========
17
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $159,314 $157,042 $150,985
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 34,281 $ 13,039 $ 13,810
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
Parker & Parsley 88-B Conv., L.P. and the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are
parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
--------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 94 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 88-B
Conv., L.P. is 71.119936% and 28.880064%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared Williamson Petroleum
Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
18
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 528,956 612,323
Revisions (215,651) (183,598)
Production (43,365) (52,254)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 269,940 376,471
Revisions 375,777 553,985
Production (41,830) (57,190)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 603,887 873,266
Revisions 114,704 59,721
Production (45,729) (53,620)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 672,862 879,367
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.59 per barrel of NGLs and $7.85 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $5,167,000 and undiscounted was $10,831,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 22,071 $ 15,072 $ 2,957
Future production costs (11,240) (8,674) (2,289)
-------- -------- -------
10,831 6,398 668
10% annual discount factor (5,664) (3,054) (210)
-------- -------- -------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 5,167 $ 3,344 $ 458
======== ======== =======
19
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (889) $ (356) $ (188)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,910 1,466 (1,276)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 862 2,739 (280)
Accretion of discount 334 46 207
Changes in production rates, timing and other (394) (1,009) (77)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,823 2,886 (1,614)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 3,344 458 2,072
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 5,167 $ 3,344 $ 458
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 50% 44% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 49%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 5% 17%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $62,153 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general
partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all production
expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays
1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1%
of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
20
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $8,954,000.
Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial
Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses allocated to the
limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs and
expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the extent its
share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
21
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of Texas
with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
22
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until August 1997.
From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October 1996,
he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From June 1988
to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
23
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 25% of its operating and general
and administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated approximately
25% of the Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 94 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
24
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreement $159,314 $ 157,042 $150,985
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 34,281 $ 13,039 $ 13,810
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
25
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
26
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
Dated: March 29, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
--------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 29, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 29, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Amended and Restated Certificate and -
Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Parker & Parsley 88-B, L.P. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit A of Amendment
No. 1 of the Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-19659)
4(b) Form of Subscription Agreement and -
Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to
Exhibit D of the Partnership's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-19659) (hereinafter
called the Partnership's Registration Statement)
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
D of the Partnership's Registration Statement
10(b) Exploration and Development Program -
Agreement incorporated by reference to
Exhibit C of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
28
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-B, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
--------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 613,966 $ 591,346 $1,318,092 $ 717,449 $ 578,573 $ 810,500 $1,052,408
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 383,951 $ 547,793 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 331,361 $ 347,058 $ 805,539 $ 236,642 $ (488,631) $ (344,997) $ 397,674
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 3,314 $ 3,471 $ 8,055 $ 2,366 $ (4,887) $ (3,450) $ 3,977
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 328,047 $ 343,587 $ 797,484 $ 234,276 $ (483,744) $ (341,547) $ 393,697
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 36.64 $ 38.37 $ 89.06 $ 26.16 $ (54.03) $ (38.14) $ 43.97
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 28.91 $ 38.90 $ 86.90 $ 28.92 $ 24.02 $ 50.67 $ 54.14
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,403,977 $1,317,412 $1,327,803 $1,313,164 $1,334,302 $2,051,284 $2,848,468
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
88-C Conv., L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October
12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 3,411
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 3,591
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 996
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 292.92
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for 3.52 times
the past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 150.70
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 142.82
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 273.28
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 284.32
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 149
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as any
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2038, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 110,984 $ 51,156
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 51,595 66,963
---------- ----------
Total current assets 162,579 118,119
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 2,399,899 2,458,118
Accumulated depletion (2,032,952) (2,078,258)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 366,947 379,860
---------- ----------
$ 529,526 $ 497,979
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 10,309 $ 5,927
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 5,177 4,905
Limited partners (3,411 interests) 514,040 487,147
---------- ----------
519,217 492,052
---------- ----------
$ 529,526 $ 497,979
========== ==========
The financial information included herein as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared
by the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
--------------------- ---------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 102,918 $ 103,726 $ 215,104 $ 198,755
Interest 789 1,027 1,734 1,783
Gain on disposition of assets 2,508 2,824 2,508 2,824
-------- -------- -------- --------
106,215 107,577 219,346 203,362
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 47,040 39,337 82,788 73,398
General and administrative 2,912 3,112 6,678 5,963
Depletion 7,817 6,008 13,659 12,975
Abandoned property 3,230 - 3,230 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
60,999 48,457 106,355 92,336
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 45,216 $ 59,120 $ 112,991 $ 111,026
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 452 $ 591 $ 1,130 $ 1,110
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 44,764 $ 58,529 $ 111,861 $ 109,916
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 13.12 $ 17.15 $ 32.79 $ 32.22
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 4,905 $ 487,147 $ 492,052
Distributions (858) (84,968) (85,826)
Net income 1,130 111,861 112,991
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 5,177 $ 514,040 $ 519,217
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 112,991 $ 111,026
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 13,659 12,975
Gain on disposition of assets (2,508) (2,824)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 15,368 (11,879)
Accounts payable 5,157 2,361
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 144,667 111,659
-------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (931) (1,751)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 1,918 2,824
-------- --------
Net cash provided by investing activities 987 1,073
-------- --------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (85,826) (119,650)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 59,828 (6,918)
Cash at beginning of period 51,156 56,353
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 110,984 $ 49,435
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in 1988 as a
general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was converted to a
Delaware limited partnership in 1989.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 8% to $215,104 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $198,755 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
6
a decline in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 4,777 barrels
of oil, 1,958 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 8,160 mcf of gas were
sold, or 8,095 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June
30, 2000, 5,355 barrels of oil, 2,398 barrels of NGLs and 9,952 mcf of gas were
sold, or 9,412 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $1.44, or 5%, from $26.96
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $28.40 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.13, or 22%, from
$13.94 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.07 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 169% from $2.10
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.64 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Gains on disposition of assets of $2,508 and $2,824 were recognized during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during the period ended June 30, 2001 was due to salvage income received on one
well plugged and abandoned during the current period. The gain recognized during
the period ended June 30, 2000 resulted from equipment credits received on one
fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $106,355 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $92,336 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $14,019,
or 15%. The increase was due to increases in production costs, general and
administrative expenses ("G&A"), depletion and abandoned property costs.
Production costs were $82,788 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and $73,398
for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $9,390 increase, or 13%. The increase
was due to additional workover and well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate
well production and increased production taxes due to higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel costs. During this period, G&A increased 12%, from
$5,963 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $6,678 for the same period in
2001, primarily due to increased audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $13,659 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$12,975 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $684, or 5%. This increase
was due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June 30, 2001
due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of 578
barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in
2000.
Abandoned property costs of $3,230 were incurred for the six months ended June
30, 2001 to plug and abandon one well.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased slightly to $102,918 for the
three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $103,726 for the same period in
2000. The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in production and lower
average prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
gas and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 2,619 barrels of oil,
1,005 barrels of NGLs and 4,630 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,396 BOEs. For the
three months ended June 30, 2000, 2,662 barrels of oil, 1,276 barrels of NGLs
and 5,183 mcf of gas were sold, or 4,802 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.58, or 2%, from $27.57
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.99 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.16, or
8%, from $13.67 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.83 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 51% to
$3.74 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.47 during the same
period in 2000.
Gains on disposition of assets of $2,508 and $2,824 were recognized during the
three months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during the period ended June 30, 2001 was due to salvage income received on one
well plugged and abandoned during the current period. The gain recognized during
the period ended June 30, 2000 resulted from equipment credits received on one
fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $60,999 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $48,457 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$12,542, or 26%. This increase was due to increases in production costs,
depletion and abandoned property costs, offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $47,040 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$39,337 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $7,703 increase, or 20%. The
increase was due to additional workover and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 6%, from $3,112 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $2,912 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a decline
in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $7,817 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$6,008 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,809, or 30%. This increase
was attributable to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of
43 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
8
Abandoned property costs of $3,230 were incurred for the three months ended June
30, 2001 to plug and abandon one well.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $33,008 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $16,300 and a
reduction in working capital of $30,043, offset by increases in production costs
of $9,390, G&A expenses of $715 and abandoned property costs of $3,230. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2001 which contributed an additional $50,373 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $34,073 resulting from the decline in production during 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in production costs was
primarily due to additional workover and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production and increased production taxes associated with higher
oil and gas prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due to increased audit and
tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on
various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds of $1,918 and $2,824 were recognized during the six months ended June
30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized during the period ended
June 30, 2001 was due to salvage income received on one well plugged and
abandoned during the current period. The gain recognized during the period ended
June 30, 2000 resulted from equipment credits received on one fully depleted
well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$85,826, of which $858 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$84,968 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $119,650, of which $1,197 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $118,453 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
9
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv.,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 51,156 $ 56,353
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 66,963 40,622
----------- -----------
Total current assets 118,119 96,975
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 2,458,118 2,513,824
Accumulated depletion (2,078,258) (2,110,906)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 379,860 402,918
----------- -----------
$ 497,979 $ 499,893
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 5,927 $ 8,955
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 4,905 4,894
Limited partners (3,411 interests) 487,147 486,044
----------- -----------
492,052 490,938
----------- -----------
$ 497,979 $ 499,893
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 443,642 $ 246,242 200,460
Interest 4,268 2,112 2,970
Gain on disposition of assets 5,650 - 2,175
--------- --------- ---------
453,560 248,354 205,605
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 151,650 131,165 142,438
General and administrative 13,129 7,217 5,997
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 119,715
Depletion 25,125 40,513 97,851
Abandoned property 2,166 - -
--------- --------- ---------
192,070 178,895 366,001
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 261,490 $ 69,459 $(160,396)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 2,615 $ 695 $ (1,604)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 258,875 $ 68,764 $(158,792)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 75.89 $ 20.16 $ (46.55)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 7,326 $ 726,841 $ 734,167
Distributions (777) (76,894) (77,671)
Net loss (1,604) (158,792) (160,396)
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 4,945 491,155 496,100
Distributions (746) (73,875) (74,621)
Net income 695 68,764 69,459
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 4,894 486,044 490,938
Distributions (2,604) (257,772) (260,376)
Net income 2,615 258,875 261,490
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 4,905 $ 487,147 $ 492,052
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 261,490 $ 69,459 $(160,396)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 119,715
Depletion 25,125 40,513 97,851
Gain on disposition of assets (5,650) - (2,175)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (26,341) (16,186) 10,141
Accounts payable (3,028) 2,588 (7,979)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 251,596 96,374 57,157
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (2,067) (3,851) (5,337)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 5,650 3,435 2,175
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 3,583 (416) (3,162)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (260,376) (74,621) (77,671)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (5,197) 21,337 (23,676)
Cash at beginning of year 56,353 35,016 58,692
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 51,156 $ 56,353 $ 35,016
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in
1988 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1989. The Partnership's managing
general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the unit-of-
production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil (dominant
mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants. The
carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non- partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $119,715 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $35,215 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 261,490 $ 69,459 $(160,396)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax reporting
purposes less than amounts for financial reporting
purposes 21,929 37,157 94,995
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 119,715
Other, net (822) 3,106 (4,638)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 282,597 $ 109,722 $ 49,676
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---------- ----------- ----------
Development costs $ 2,067 $ 3,851 $ 5,337
========== =========== ==========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 124,434 $ 128,446
Completed wells and equipment 2,333,684 2,385,378
----------- -----------
2,458,118 2,513,824
Accumulated depletion (2,078,258) (2,110,906)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 379,860 $ 402,918
=========== ===========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 58,509 $ 56,225 $ 54,996
Reimbursement of general and administrative expenses $ 9,514 $ 1,096 $ 2,651
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. and the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties
to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
--------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated at
the Partnership level and ten limited partner interests owned by Pioneer
USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. is
58.387538% and 41.612462%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ---------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 181,762 227,096
Revisions (75,078) (70,056)
Production (14,859) (19,764)
--------- ---------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 91,825 137,276
Revisions 124,253 193,483
Production (14,136) (21,119)
--------- ---------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 201,942 309,640
Revisions 35,970 23,002
Production (15,453) (19,618)
--------- ---------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 222,459 313,024
========= =========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.56 per barrel of NGLs and $7.78 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $1,724,000 and undiscounted was
approximately $3,597,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 7,379 $ 5,029 $ 1,007
Future production costs (3,782) (2,920) (784)
-------- -------- --------
3,597 2,109 223
10% annual discount factor (1,873) (998) (69)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 1,724 $ 1,111 $ 154
======== ======== ========
11
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (292) $ (115) $ (58)
Net changes in prices and production costs 661 496 (461)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 275 900 (94)
Accretion of discount 111 15 72
Changes in production rates, timing and other (142) (339) (26)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 613 957 (567)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 1,111 154 721
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 1,724 $ 1,111 $ 154
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 52% 46% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 51%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 6% 21%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $21,565 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's
12
revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $3,411,000. Pioneer
USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership
capital less commission and organization and offering costs allocated to
the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs
and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the
extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 80% to $443,642 for 2000 as
compared to $246,242 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and an increase in production. In 2000, 10,646 barrels
of oil, 4,807 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 19,618 mcf of gas were
sold, or 18,723 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 9,260 barrels of
oil, 4,876 barrels of NGLs and 21,119 mcf of gas were sold, or 17,656 BOEs. Due
to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas properties,
management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the future until
the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.09, or 70%, from
$17.24 in 1999 to $29.33 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.41, or 52%, from $10.42 in 1999 to $15.83 in 2000. The average
price received per mcf of gas increased 66% from $1.70 in 1999 to $2.82 in 2000.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade,
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $5,650 recognized in 2000 was due to equipment
credits received from salvage income of $4,703 on one well plugged and abandoned
during the current year and $947 on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $192,070 as compared to $178,895
in 1999, an increase of $13,175, or 7%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs, general and administrative expenses ("G&A") and
abandoned property costs, offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $151,650 in 2000 and $131,165 in 1999, resulting in a
$20,485 increase, or 16%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production.
Abandoned property costs of $2,166 during 2000 were related to the plugging and
abandonment of one well during the current year.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
82% from $7,217 in 1999 to $13,129 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $9,514 in 2000 and $1,096 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $25,125 in 2000 as compared to $40,513 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $15,388, or 38%. This decrease was primarily due to a 26,409 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices, offset by an increase in oil production of 1,386 barrels for the period
ended December 31, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 23% to $246,242 from
$200,460 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 9,260 barrels of oil,
4,876 barrels of NGLs and 21,119 mcf of gas were sold, or 17,656 BOEs. In 1998,
10,457 barrels of oil, 4,402 barrels of NGLs and 19,764 mcf of gas were sold, or
18,153 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.94, or 30%, from
$13.30 in 1998 to $17.24 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.48, or 50%, from $6.94 in 1998 to $10.42 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 10% from $1.55 in 1998 to $1.70 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $2,175 was recognized during 1998 from
equipment credits on a well plugged and abandoned in 1997.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $178,895 as compared to $366,001
in 1998, a decrease of $187,106, or 51%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $131,165 in 1999 and $142,438 in 1998, resulting in an
$11,273 decrease, or 8%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs, workover expenses and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in
production taxes due to increased oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 20% from $5,997 in 1998 to $7,217 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $1,096 in
1999 and $2,651 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long- Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets
to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $119,715 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $40,513 in 1999 compared to $97,851 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $57,338, or 59%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 79,930 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of 1,197
barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in
1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $155,222 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $199,556, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $20,485, G&A expenses paid of $5,912, abandoned property costs paid of $2,166
and working capital of $15,771. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted
from the increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an
additional $164,214 to oil and gas receipts and an increase of $35,342 resulting
from the increase in production during 2000. The increase in production costs
was primarily due to increased production taxes associated with higher oil and
gas prices and additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on several oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $5,650 recognized in 2000 was due to
equipment credits received from salvage income of $4,703 on one well plugged and
abandoned during the current year and $947 on one fully depleted well. Proceeds
from disposition of assets of $3,435 during 1999 were received from equipment
credits on active wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $260,376, of which $2,604 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $257,772 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $74,621, of which
$746 was distributed to the managing general partner and $73,875 to the limited
partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C CONV., L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
---------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 215,104 $ 198,755 $ 443,642 $ 246,242 $ 200,460 $ 284,284 $ 372,187
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 119,715 $ 137,839 $ 4,494
========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 112,991 $ 111,026 $ 261,490 $ 69,459 $ (160,396) $ (84,748) $ 128,417
========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,130 $ 1,110 $ 2,615 $ 695 $ (1,604) $ (847) $ 1,284
========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 111,861 $ 109,916 $ 258,875 $ 68,764 $ (158,792) $ (83,901) $ 127,133
========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 32.79 $ 32.22 $ 75.89 $ 20.16 $ (46.55) $ (24.60) $ 37.27
========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 24.91 $ 34.73 $ 75.57 $ 21.66 $ 22.54 $ 44.49 $ 47.64
========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 529,526 $ 493,630 $ 497,979 $ 499,893 $ 502,467 $ 748,513 $ 982,497
========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
88-C, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 88-C, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a multiple
of distributions for the past four quarterly distributions including
the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June 30,
2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in year
of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's discussion
and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, for the
six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's discussion
and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, for the
year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 2,431
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 2,558
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 706
USA(a),(b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 291.04
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.50 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 148.52
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 140.76
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 271.40
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 282.45
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), $ 149
(f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should not
assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the value
or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the operating
period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as in the
merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share of
the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3% of
the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July 13,
2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses represent
estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell the assets
of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs associated with
such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2038, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C , L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 74,126 $ 31,689
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 36,776 47,902
---------- ----------
Total current assets 110,902 79,591
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 1,710,394 1,751,887
Accumulated depletion (1,449,252) (1,481,594)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 261,142 270,293
---------- ----------
$ 372,044 $ 349,884
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 7,371 $ 4,246
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 3,633 3,443
Limited partners (2,431 interests) 361,040 342,195
---------- ----------
364,673 345,638
---------- ----------
$ 372,044 $ 349,884
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 73,295 $ 73,472 $ 153,108 $ 141,499
Interest 514 677 1,033 1,174
Gain on disposition of assets 1,788 2,013 1,788 2,013
-------- -------- -------- --------
75,597 76,162 155,929 144,686
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 33,489 28,016 58,961 52,306
General and administrative 2,359 2,204 4,753 4,245
Depletion 5,534 4,268 9,682 9,251
Abandoned property 2,330 - 2,330 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
43,712 34,488 75,726 65,802
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 31,885 $ 41,674 $ 80,203 $ 78,884
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 319 $ 417 $ 802 $ 789
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 31,566 $ 41,257 $ 79,401 $ 78,095
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 12.98 $ 16.97 $ 32.66 $ 32.12
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 3,443 $ 342,195 $ 345,638
Distributions (612) (60,556) (61,168)
Net income 802 79,401 80,203
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 3,633 $ 361,040 $ 364,673
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 80,203 $ 78,884
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 9,682 9,251
Gain on disposition of assets (1,788) (2,013)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 11,126 (8,319)
Accounts payable 3,678 1,630
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 102,901 79,433
-------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (663) (1,248)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 1,367 2,013
-------- --------
Net cash provided by investing activities 704 765
-------- --------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (61,168) (85,274)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 42,437 (5,076)
Cash at beginning of period 31,689 35,943
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 74,126 $ 30,867
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 8% to $153,108 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $141,499 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decline in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 3,403 barrels
6
of oil, 1,389 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 5,811 mcf of gas were
sold, or 5,761 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June
30, 2000, 3,814 barrels of oil, 1,706 barrels of NGLs and 7,086 mcf of gas were
sold, or 6,701 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $1.44, or 5%, from $26.96
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $28.40 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.13, or 22%, from
$13.94 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.07 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 169% from $2.10
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.64 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Gains on disposition of assets of $1,788 and $2,013 were recognized during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during the period ended June 30, 2001 was due to salvage income received on one
well plugged and abandoned during the current period. The gain recognized during
the period ended June 30, 2000 was due to equipment credits received on one
fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $75,726 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $65,802 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $9,924,
or 15%. This increase was due to increases in production costs, general and
administrative expenses ("G&A"), depletion and abandoned property costs.
Production costs were $58,961 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and $52,306
for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $6,655 increase, or 13%. The increase
was due to additional workover and well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate
well production and increased production taxes due to higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
12%, from $4,245 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4,753 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to increased audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $9,682 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$9,251 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $431, or 5%. This increase
was due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June 30, 2001
due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of 411
barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in
2000.
Abandoned property costs of $2,330 were incurred for the six months ended June
30, 2001 to plug and abandon one well.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased slightly to $73,295 for the
three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $73,472 for the same period in
2000. The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in production and lower
average prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
gas and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 1,866 barrels of oil,
716 barrels of NGLs and 3,294 mcf of gas were sold, or 3,131 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 1,884 barrels of oil, 907 barrels of NGLs and 3,694
mcf of gas were sold, or 3,407 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.58, or 2%, from $27.57
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.99 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.16, or
8%, from $13.67 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.83 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 51% to
$3.74 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.47 during the same
period in 2000.
Gains on disposition of assets of $1,788 and $2,013 were recognized during the
three months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during the period ended June 30, 2001 was due to salvage income received on one
well plugged and abandoned during the current period. The gain recognized during
the period ended June 30, 2000 was due to equipment credits received on one
fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $43,712 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $34,488 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$9,224, or 27%. This increase was due to increases in production costs, G&A,
depletion and abandoned property costs.
Production costs were $33,489 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$28,016 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $5,473 increase, or 20%. The
increase was due to additional workover and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A increased 7%, from $2,204 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $2,359 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to increased
audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $5,534 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$4,268 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,266, or 30%. This increase
was attributable to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of
18 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
8
Abandoned property costs of $2,330 were incurred for the three months ended June
30, 2001 to plug and abandon one well.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $23,468 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $11,468 and a
reduction in working capital of $21,493, offset by increases in production costs
of $6,655, G&A expenses of $508 and abandoned property costs of $2,330. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2001 which contributed an additional $35,738 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $24,270 resulting from the decline in production during 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in production costs was
primarily due to additional workover and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production and increased production taxes due to higher oil and
gas prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due to increased audit and tax
fees.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on
various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $1,367 and $2,013 were recognized during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The proceeds recognized
during 2001 were due to salvage income received on a well plugged and abandoned
during the current year. The proceeds recognized during 2000 were due to
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$61,168, of which $612 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$60,556 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $85,274, of which $853 was distributed to the
managing general partner and $84,421 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
9
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 31,689 $ 35,943
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 47,902 28,942
----------- -----------
Total current assets 79,591 64,885
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 1,751,887 1,791,588
Accumulated depletion (1,481,594) (1,504,855)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 270,293 286,733
----------- -----------
$ 349,884 $ 351,618
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 4,246 $ 6,404
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 3,443 3,439
Limited partners (2,431 interests) 342,195 341,775
----------- -----------
345,638 345,214
----------- -----------
$ 349,884 $ 351,618
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 316,382 $ 175,483 142,874
Interest 2,805 1,335 1,945
Gain on disposition of assets 4,027 -- 1,550
--------- --------- ---------
323,214 176,818 146,369
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 108,093 93,481 101,514
General and administrative 9,672 5,434 4,303
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 85,160
Depletion 17,913 28,843 69,935
Abandoned property 1,544 -- --
--------- --------- ---------
137,222 127,758 260,912
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 185,992 $ 49,060 $(114,543)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 1,860 $ 491 $ (1,145)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 184,132 $ 48,569 $(113,398)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 75.74 $ 19.98 $ (46.65)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 5,179 $ 514,055 $ 519,234
Distributions (554) (54,801) (55,355)
Net loss (1,145) (113,398) (114,543)
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 3,480 345,856 349,336
Distributions (532) (52,650) (53,182)
Net income 491 48,569 49,060
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 3,439 341,775 345,214
Distributions (1,856) (183,712) (185,568)
Net income 1,860 184,132 185,992
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 3,443 $ 342,195 $ 345,638
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 185,992 $ 49,060 $(114,543)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 85,160
Depletion 17,913 28,843 69,935
Gain on disposition of assets (4,027) -- (1,550)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (18,960) (11,532) 7,229
Accounts payable (2,158) 1,866 (5,686)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 178,760 68,237 40,545
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,473) (2,744) (3,804)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 4,027 2,448 1,550
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 2,554 (296) (2,254)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (185,568) (53,182) (55,355)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (4,254) 14,759 (17,064)
Cash at beginning of year 35,943 21,184 38,248
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 31,689 $ 35,943 $ 21,184
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 88-C, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the
7
respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $85,160 related to its
proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $24,633 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 185,992 $ 49,060 $(114,543)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax reporting
purposes less than amounts for financial reporting
purposes 15,635 26,451 67,898
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes -- -- 85,160
Other, net (560) 2,209 (3,307)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 201,067 $ 77,720 $ 35,208
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
Development costs $ 1,473 $ 2,744 $ 3,804
============ ============ ============
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 88,684 $ 91,543
Completed wells and equipment 1,663,203 1,700,045
----------- -----------
1,751,887 1,791,588
Accumulated depletion (1,481,594) (1,504,855)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 270,293 $ 286,733
=========== ===========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $41,699 $40,071 $39,194
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 6,776 $ 782 $ 1,889
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
Parker & Parsley 88-C Conv., L.P. and the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are
parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA(1) Partnerships (2)
-------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and five limited partner
interests owned by Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 88-C
Conv., L.P. is 41.612462% and 58.387538%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 129,544 161,856
Revisions (53,503) (49,926)
Production (10,596) (14,091)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 65,445 97,839
Revisions 88,560 137,904
Production (10,071) (15,049)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 143,934 220,694
Revisions 25,631 16,368
Production (11,023) (13,979)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 158,542 223,083
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000 the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.56 per barrel of NGLs and $7.78 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $1,229,000 and undiscounted was $2,564,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 5,259 $ 3,584 $ 717
Future production costs (2,695) (2,081) (558)
------- ------- -------
2,564 1,503 159
10% annual discount factor (1,335) (711) (49)
------- ------- -------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 1,229 $ 792 $ 110
======= ======= =======
11
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (208) $ (82) $ (41)
Net changes in prices and production costs 471 354 (328)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 196 641 (67)
Accretion of discount 79 11 51
Changes in production rates, timing and other (101) (242) (19)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 437 682 (404)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 792 110 514
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 1,229 $ 792 $ 110
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 52% 45% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 51%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 6% 21%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $15,388 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's
12
revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$2,431,000. Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of
initial Partnership capital less commission and organization and
offering costs allocated to the limited partners and to contribute
amounts necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the
Partnership agreement to the extent its share of revenues does not cover
such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 80% to $316,382 for 2000 as
compared to $175,483 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and an increase in production. In 2000, 7,593 barrels of
oil, 3,430 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 13,979 mcf of gas were
sold, or 13,353 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 6,595 barrels of
oil, 3,476 barrels of NGLs and 15,049 mcf of gas were sold, or 12,579 BOEs. Due
to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas properties,
management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the future until
the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.09, or 70%, from
$17.24 in 1999 to $29.33 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.41, or 52%, from $10.42 in 1999 to $15.83 in 2000. The average
price received per mcf of gas increased 66% from $1.70 in 1999 to $2.82 in 2000.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade,
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $4,027 recognized in 2000 was due to salvage
income from equipment credits of $3,352 on one well plugged and abandoned during
the current year and $675 on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $137,222 as compared to $127,758
in 1999, an increase of $9,464, or 7%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs, general and administrative expenses ("G&A") and
abandoned property costs, offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $108,093 in 2000 and $93,481 in 1999, resulting in a
$14,612, or 16%, increase. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices, additional well maintenance and
workover costs incurred to stimulate well production.
Abandoned property costs of $1,544 during 2000 were related to the plugging and
abandonment of one well during the current year.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
78% from $5,434 in 1999 to $9,672 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $6,776 in 2000 and $782 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
2000 as compared to $28,843 in 1999, representing a decrease of
$10,930, or 38%. This decrease was primarily due to a 18,820
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a
result of higher commodity prices, offset by an increase in oil
production of 998 barrels for the period ended December 31, 2000
compared to the same period in 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 23% to $175,483 from
$142,874 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 6,595 barrels of oil,
3,476 barrels of NGLs and 15,049 mcf of gas were sold, or 12,579 BOEs. In 1998,
7,453 barrels of oil, 3,143 barrels of NGLs and 14,091 mcf of gas were sold, or
12,945 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.94, or 30%, from
$13.30 in 1998 to $17.24 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.48, or 50%, from $6.94 in 1998 to $10.42 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 10% from $1.55 in 1998 to $1.70 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $1,550 was recognized during 1998 from
equipment credits on a well plugged and abandoned in 1997.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $127,758 as compared to $260,912
in 1998, a decrease of $133,154, or 51%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $93,481 in 1999 and $101,514 in 1998, resulting in an
$8,033, or 8%, decrease. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs, workover expenses and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in
production taxes due to increased oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 26% from $4,303 in 1998 to $5,434 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $782 in 1999
and $1,889 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $85,160 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $28,843 in 1999 compared to $69,935 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $41,092, or 59%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 56,967 barrels of oil
during 1999 due to higher commodity prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net
depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the
fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in oil production of 858 barrels for the
period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $110,523 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $142,369, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $14,612, G&A expenses paid of $4,238, abandoned property costs paid of $1,544
and working capital of $11,452. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted
from the increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an
additional $116,842 to oil and gas receipts and an increase of $25,527 resulting
from an increase in production during 2000. The increase in production costs was
primarily due to increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas
prices and additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate
well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of
the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on several oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $4,027 during 2000 were due to salvage
income from equipment credits of $3,352 on one well plugged and abandoned during
the current year and $675 on one fully depleted well. Proceeds from disposition
of assets of $2,448 during 1999 were from equipment credits on active wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $185,568, of which $1,856 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $183,712 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $53,182, of which
$532 was distributed to the managing general partner and $52,650 to the limited
partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 88-C, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
--------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $153,108 $ 141,499 $ 316,382 $ 175,483 $ 142,874 $ 202,605 $ 265,257
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 85,160 $ 98,341 $ 3,203
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 80,203 $ 78,884 $ 185,992 $ 49,060 $ (114,543) $ (60,727) $ 91,333
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 802 $ 789 $ 1,860 $ 491 $ (1,145) $ (607) $ 913
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 79,401 $ 78,095 $ 184,132 $ 48,569 $ (113,398) $ (60,120) $ 90,420
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 32.66 $ 32.12 $ 75.74 $ 19.98 $ (46.65) $ (24.73) $ 37.19
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 24.91 $ 34.73 $ 75.57 $ 21.66 $ 22.54 $ 44.49 $ 47.64
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $372,044 $ 346,858 $ 349,884 $ 351,618 $ 353,874 $ 529,458 $ 696,541
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
--------------------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
--------------------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
Producing Properties 88-A, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus
dated October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of
limited partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of
June 30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended
December 31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 5,611
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 6,928
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 2,053
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 368.52
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c) 4.13 times
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 267.85
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 263.74
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 346.58
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 358.41
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment (f) --
-----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's oil and gas
reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31, 2001,
less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (B) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Not applicable. Since this partnership purchased producing properties,
there were no intangible drilling and development costs nor any related
write-off for tax purposes.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
Although not required by the partnership agreement for the partnership,
special legal counsel will render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners
to Pioneer USA that (1) neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to
approve the merger of the partnership by its limited partners will adversely
affect the federal income tax classification of the partnership or any of its
limited partners; and (2) neither the grant nor exercise of such right will
result in the loss of any limited partner's limited liability. In addition, the
counsel designated to render the opinion is not required to be counsel other
than counsel to Pioneer USA or the partnership. Both the designated counsel and
the legal opinion will be submitted for approval by the limited partners.
Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, of Wilmington,
Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal opinion on behalf of the
limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals include an approval of
that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the opinion is attached as
an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2038, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-19133-A
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2225758
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- -----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000.................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................ 6
Notes to Financial Statements........................... 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K........................ 11
Signatures.............................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 369,133 $ 253,499
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 68,621 115,810
---------- ----------
Total current assets 437,754 369,309
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 4,855,712 4,855,712
Accumulated depletion (3,755,768) (3,719,241)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,099,944 1,136,471
---------- ----------
$ 1,537,698 $ 1,505,780
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 19,658 $ 11,054
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 15,113 14,879
Limited partners (11,222 interests) 1,502,927 1,479,847
---------- ----------
1,518,040 1,494,726
---------- ----------
$ 1,537,698 $ 1,505,780
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 154,567 $ 197,479 $ 350,012 $ 346,895
Interest 3,000 4,202 6,225 7,804
Gain on disposition of assets 6,447 - 6,447 9,859
-------- -------- -------- --------
164,014 201,681 362,684 364,558
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 61,994 124,619 127,329 199,253
General and administrative 4,643 5,925 10,506 10,407
Depletion 16,473 17,322 36,527 29,947
Abandoned property 10,766 - 10,766 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
93,876 147,866 185,128 239,607
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 70,138 $ 53,815 $ 177,556 $ 124,951
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 702 $ 539 $ 1,776 $ 1,250
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 69,436 $ 53,276 $ 175,780 $ 123,701
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 6.18 $ 4.74 $ 15.66 $ 11.02
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 14,879 $1,479,847 $1,494,726
Distributions (1,542) (152,700) (154,242)
Net income 1,776 175,780 177,556
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 15,113 $1,502,927 $1,518,040
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 177,556 $ 124,951
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 36,527 29,947
Gain on disposition of assets (6,447) (9,859)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 47,189 (14,004)
Accounts payable 8,604 12,811
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 263,429 143,846
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties - (782)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 6,447 9,859
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities 6,447 9,077
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (154,242) (232,627)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 115,634 (79,704)
Cash at beginning of period 253,499 323,271
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 369,133 $ 243,567
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 1% to $350,012 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $346,895 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a decline in production and lower average prices received
for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 8,258 barrels of oil, 3,840
7
barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 16,169 mcf of gas were sold, or
14,793 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 8,488 barrels of oil, 5,238 barrels of NGLs and 20,402 mcf of gas were
sold, or 17,126 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.53, or 2%, from $27.71
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.18 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.47, or 3%, from $13.93
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.40 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 129% from $1.90 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.35 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Gains on disposition of assets of $6,447 and $9,859 were recognized during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during the six months ended June 30, 2001 resulted from equipment credits
received on one well that was plugged and abandoned during the current period.
Expenses incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2001 to plug this well
were $10,766. The gain recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2000
resulted from equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $185,128 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $239,607 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $54,479,
or 23%. This decrease was primarily due to a decline in production costs, offset
by increases in abandoned property costs, depletion and general and
administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $127,329 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$199,253 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a decrease of $71,924, or
36%. This decrease was primarily due to lower workover and well maintenance
costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
1% from $10,407 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $10,506 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $36,527 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$29,947 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $6,580, or 22%. This
increase was primarily due to a downward revision to proved reserves during the
period ended June 30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices as compared to the same
period in 2000.
8
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 22% to $154,567 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $197,479 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
NGLs and a decline in production, offset by higher average prices received for
gas. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 3,841 barrels of oil, 1,984
barrels of NGLs and 7,439 mcf of gas were sold, or 7,065 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 4,780 barrels of oil, 2,886 barrels of NGLs and
10,613 mcf of gas were sold, or 9,435 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.58, or 2%, from $27.50
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.92 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $1.83, or 12%, from
$14.66 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $12.83 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 55% from $2.23
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.46 for the same period in
2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $6,447 was recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2001 resulting from equipment credits received on one well
plugged and abandoned during the current period. Expenses incurred to plug this
well were $10,766.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $93,876 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $147,866 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$53,990, or 37%. This decrease was primarily due to declines in production
costs, G&A and depletion, offset by an increase in abandoned property costs.
Production costs were $61,994 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$124,619 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $62,625 decrease, or 50%.
This decrease was primarily due to lower workover and well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A decreased 22% from $5,925 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $4,643 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated as a result of
lower oil and gas revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2001 as
compared to the period ended June 30, 2000, in addition to decreased audit and
tax fees.
Depletion was $16,473 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$17,322 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $849, or 5%. This decrease
was primarily due to a decline in oil production of 939 barrels for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
9
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $119,583 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was primarily due to a reduction of $56,986 in working capital, an
increase of $1,538 in oil and gas sales receipts and a decline in production
costs of $71,924, offset by increases in abandoned property costs of $10,766 and
G&A expenses of $99. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the
increase in gas and NGL prices of $52,442 during 2001, offset by a decline of
$46,359 in production and a $4,545 decline in oil prices in 2001 as compared to
the same period in 2000. The decrease in production costs was primarily due to
lower workover and well maintenance costs. The increase in G&A was primarily due
to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2000
were related to expenditures for upgrades of oil and gas equipment on active
properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $6,447 and $9,859 were recognized during
the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Proceeds during 2001
were from equipment credits on one well that was plugged and abandoned during
the current period. Proceeds during 2000 were from equipment credits on one
fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$154,242, of which $1,542 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$152,700 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $232,627, of which $2,326 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $230,301 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
10
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING
PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 7, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-19133-A
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2225758
------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($500 PER UNIT)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES /X/ NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. /X/
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$5,572,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 11,222.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc. ("Pioneer USA"). Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer
Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had
11,222 limited partnership interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 59% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial liability due to pollution and other
environmental damages. Although the Partnership believes that
2
its business operations do not impair environmental quality and that its costs
of complying with any applicable environmental regulations are not currently
significant, the Partnership cannot predict what, if any, effect these
environmental regulations may have on its current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of working interests in properties on which
oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject to
landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
The Partnership completed one purchase of producing properties. This acquisition
involved the purchase of working interests in 21 properties, all of which are
operated by the managing general partner. In subsequent years, the Partnership
participated in the drilling of three additional wells and one well was plugged
and abandoned. At December 31, 2000 the Partnership had 23 producing oil and gas
properties.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 11,222 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 507 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $458,003 and $165,195, respectively,
of such revenue-related distributions were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 742,384 $ 495,753 $ 443,496 $ 753,775 $ 938,418
=========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ - $ 280,950 $ - $ 6,231 $ -
=========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 357,190 $ (111,304) $ (13,621) $ 255,412 $ 424,569
=========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 3,572 $ (1,113) $ (136) $ 2,554 $ 4,246
=========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 353,618 $ (110,191) $ (13,485) $ 252,858 $ 420,323
=========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 31.51 $ (9.82) $ (1.20) $ 22.53 $ 37.46
=========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 40.81 $ 14.72 $ 24.99 $ 50.52 $ 45.09
=========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
At year end:
------------
Identifiable assets $ 1,505,780 $1,613,628 $ 1,884,917 $2,212,937 $2,491,855
=========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 50% to $742,384 for 2000 as
compared to $495,753 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 17,170
barrels of oil, 9,806 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 37,939 mcf of
gas were sold, or 33,299 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 19,878
barrels of oil, 10,402 barrels of NGLs and 44,467 mcf of gas were sold, or
37,691 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.62, or 75%, from
$16.82 for 1999 to $29.44 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.10, or 56%, from $9.18 for 1999 to $14.28 in 2000. The average
price received per mcf of gas increased 72%, from $1.48 for 1999 to $2.55 in
2000. The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past
decade and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $9,859 was recognized during 2000 from
salvage income received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 2000 to $411,959 as compared to $619,585
in 1999, a decrease of $207,626, or 34%. This decrease was primarily the result
of declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties and depletion, offset by
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $322,751 in 2000 and $237,875 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $84,876, or 36%. The increase was primarily due to additional
workover expense and well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well
production and higher production taxes associated with higher oil and gas
prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
50% from $14,872 in 1999 to $22,272 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $18,064 in 2000 and $8,371 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $280,950 related to its oil and gas properties during 1999.
Depletion was $66,936 in 2000 as compared to $85,888 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $18,952, or 22%. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in
the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with
SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1999 and a decline in oil production of
2,708 barrels for the period ended December 31, 2000 compared to the same period
in 1999, offset by a 20,203 barrels of oil decrease in proved reserves during
2000 as a result of a significant well having lower reserves due to a revised
decline curve.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 12% to $495,753 from
$443,496 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 19,878 barrels of oil,
10,402 barrels of NGLs and 44,467 mcf of gas were sold, or 37,691 BOEs. In 1998,
22,482 barrels of oil, 12,009 barrels of NGLs and 51,099 mcf of gas were sold,
or 43,008 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.68, or 28%, from
$13.14 for 1998 to $16.82 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.87, or 45%, from $6.31 for 1998 to $9.18 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 5%, from $1.41 for 1998 to $1.48 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses increased in 1999 to $619,585 as compared to $471,884
in 1998, an increase of $147,701, or 31%. This increase was primarily the result
of increases in the impairment of oil and gas properties and G&A expenses,
offset by declines in depletion and production costs.
Production costs were $237,875 in 1999 and $252,339 in 1998, resulting in a
$14,464, or 6%, decrease. The decrease was due to less well maintenance costs
and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production taxes due to the
increase in oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 12% from $13,305 in 1998 to $14,872 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $8,371 in
1999 and $9,891 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $280,950 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1999.
Depletion was $85,888 in 1999 compared to $206,240 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $120,352, or 58%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 77,231 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a decline in oil production of 2,604
6
barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same period in
1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $159,721 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $251,009 and a decline in working capital of $988,
offset by increases in production costs paid of $84,876 and G&A expenses paid of
$7,400. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in
commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an additional $355,912 to oil and
gas receipts, offset by $104,903 resulting from the decline in production during
2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional workover expenses
and well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase
in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's
G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of
increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were
related to various upgrades of equipment.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $9,859 recognized during 2000 were from
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $462,629, of which $4,626 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $458,003 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $166,787, of which
$1,592 was distributed to the managing general partner and $165,195 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P.:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999....................................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 13
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
88-A, L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of
operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley Producing
Properties 88-A, L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 253,499 $ 323,271
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 115,810 87,732
----------- -----------
Total current assets 369,309 411,003
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 4,855,712 4,854,930
Accumulated depletion (3,719,241) (3,652,305)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,136,471 1,202,625
----------- -----------
$ 1,505,780 $ 1,613,628
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 11,054 $ 13,463
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 14,879 15,933
Limited partners (11,222 interests) 1,479,847 1,584,232
----------- -----------
1,494,726 1,600,165
----------- -----------
$ 1,505,780 $ 1,613,628
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $742,384 $ 495,753 $ 443,496
Interest 16,906 12,528 14,767
Gain on disposition of assets 9,859 - -
-------- --------- ---------
769,149 508,281 458,263
-------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 322,751 237,875 252,339
General and administrative 22,272 14,872 13,305
Impairment of oil and gas properties - 280,950 -
Depletion 66,936 85,888 206,240
-------- --------- ---------
411,959 619,585 471,884
-------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $357,190 $(111,304) $ (13,621)
======== ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 3,572 $ (1,113) $ (136)
======== ========= =========
Limited partners $353,618 $(110,191) $ (13,485)
======== ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 31.51 $ (9.82) $ (1.20)
======== ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 21,564 $ 2,153,538 $ 2,175,102
Distributions (2,790) (280,435) (283,225)
Net loss (136) (13,485) (13,621)
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 18,638 1,859,618 1,878,256
Distributions (1,592) (165,195) (166,787)
Net loss (1,113) (110,191) (111,304)
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 15,933 1,584,232 1,600,165
Distributions (4,626) (458,003) (462,629)
Net income 3,572 353,618 357,190
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 14,879 $ 1,479,847 $ 1,494,726
======== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 357,190 $(111,304) $ (13,621)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - 280,950 -
Depletion 66,936 85,888 206,240
Gain on disposition of assets (9,859) - -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (28,078) (38,277) 69,159
Accounts payable (2,409) 6,802 (31,174)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 383,780 224,059 230,604
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas equipment (782) (12,230) (1,181)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 9,859 - -
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 9,077 (12,230) (1,181)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (462,629) (166,787) (283,225)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (69,772) 45,042 (53,802)
Cash at beginning of year 323,271 278,229 332,031
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 253,499 $ 323,271 $ 278,229
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties 88-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a
limited partnership organized in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas production in Texas and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $280,950 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1999.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $949,574 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
15
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- --------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 357,190 $(111,304) $(13,621)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than (greater than)
amounts for financial reporting purposes (55,096) 24,264 26,047
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - 280,950 -
Other (247) (441) 441
--------- --------- --------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 301,847 $ 193,469 $ 12,867
========= ========= ========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Property acquisition costs $ 782 $ 12,230 $ 1,181
======== ======== =========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 4,109,672 $ 4,108,890
Completed wells and equipment 746,040 746,040
----------- -----------
4,855,712 4,854,930
Accumulated depletion (3,719,241) (3,652,305)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,136,471 $ 1,202,625
=========== ===========
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 98,073 $ 91,828 $ 99,719
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 18,064 $ 8,371 $ 9,891
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees Producing Properties 88-A ("EMPL") and the Partnership are parties
to the Program agreement. EMPL is a general partnership organized for the
benefit of certain employees of Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on
December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
--------------- -----------
Revenues:
Revenues from oil and gas production, proceeds from
sales of producing properties and all other revenues:
Before payout 4.040405% 95.959595%
After payout (2) 19.191920% 80.808080%
Costs and expenses:
Property acquisition costs, operating costs, general and
administrative expenses and other costs:
Before payout 4.040405% 95.959595%
After payout (2) 19.191920% 80.808080%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 78 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The Partnership reached payout in September 1997.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 563,684 808,875
Revisions (105,464) (18,612)
Production (34,491) (51,099)
--------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 423,729 739,164
Revisions 113,184 157,201
Production (30,280) (44,467)
--------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 506,633 851,898
Revisions (52,176) (249,428)
Production (26,976) (37,939)
--------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 427,481 564,531
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $12.90 per barrel of NGLs and $7.43 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $3,258,000 and undiscounted was $6,795,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
18
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 13,506 $ 12,421 $ 4,629
Future production costs (6,711) (5,947) (3,105)
-------- -------- -------
6,795 6,474 1,524
10% annual discount factor (3,537) (3,486) (609)
-------- -------- -------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 3,258 $ 2,988 $ 915
======== ======== =======
For the years ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (420) $ (258) $ (191)
Net changes in prices and production costs 906 2,308 (1,425)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (564) 836 (152)
Accretion of discount 299 92 244
Changes in production rates, timing and other 49 (905) (5)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 270 2,073 (1,529)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 2,988 915 2,444
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 3,258 $ 2,988 $ 915
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 59% 57% -
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 6% 28%
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 57%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $44,879 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing general partner and
operator of the Partnership's properties, all production expenses are
incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The majority of the
Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly by the
Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is initially
received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership. Under the
limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of the
Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total
19
contributions of such partner plus his share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $5,611,000.
Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial
Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses allocated to the
limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs and
expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the extent its
share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Directors
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of Texas
with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until August 1997.
From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October 1996,
he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From June 1988
to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA pays 1% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and 1% of its operating, general and
administrative expenses. In return, Pioneer USA is allocated 1% of the Program's
revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 78 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
23
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 98,073 $ 91,828 $ 99,719
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 18,064 $ 8,371 $ 9,891
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING
PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
Dated: March 26, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
--------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 26, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Agreement of Limited Partnership of -
Parker & Parsley Producing Properties
88-A, L.P. incorporated by reference to
Exhibit A of Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-19133)
(hereinafter referred to as the Partnership's
Registration Statement)
4(b) Subscription Agreement and Power of -
Attorney incorporated by reference to
Exhibit C of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4(d) Form of Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4d of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
10(b) Program Agreement incorporated by reference -
to Exhibit B of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY PRODUCING PROPERTIES 88-A, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
--------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 350,012 $ 346,895 $ 742,384 $ 495,753 $ 443,496 $ 753,775 $ 938,418
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 280,950 $ -- $ 6,231 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 177,556 $ 124,951 $ 357,190 $ (111,304) $ (13,621) $ 255,412 $ 424,569
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,776 $ 1,250 $ 3,572 $ (1,113) $ (136) $ 2,554 $ 4,246
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 175,780 $ 123,701 $ 353,618 $ (110,191) $ (13,485) $ 252,858 $ 420,323
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 15.66 $ 11.02 $ 31.51 $ (9.82) $ (1.20) $ 22.53 $ 37.46
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 13.61 $ 20.52 $ 40.81 $ 14.72 $ 24.99 $ 50.52 $ 45.09
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,537,698 $1,518,763 $1,505,780 $1,613,628 $1,884,917 $2,212,937 $2,491,855
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
Private Investment 88, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus
dated October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 9,960
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 11,812
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 3,504
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 351.76
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for 3.97 times
the past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 170.44
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 160.08
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 329.66
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 341.39
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 152
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP, of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2038, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 384,463 $ 174,638
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 136,288 190,189
---------- ----------
Total current assets 520,751 364,827
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 7,351,559 7,348,142
Accumulated depletion (6,132,322) (6,092,889)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,219,237 1,255,253
---------- ----------
$ 1,739,988 $ 1,620,080
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 25,050 $ 9,440
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 17,314 16,271
Limited partners (249 interests) 1,697,624 1,594,369
---------- ----------
1,714,938 1,610,640
---------- ----------
$ 1,739,988 $ 1,620,080
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 286,574 $ 324,217 $ 625,806 $ 598,423
Interest 2,754 3,409 5,593 6,002
-------- -------- -------- --------
289,328 327,626 631,399 604,425
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 113,938 101,258 235,058 212,006
General and administrative 7,164 9,727 15,645 17,953
Depletion 20,388 19,324 39,433 40,261
-------- -------- -------- --------
141,490 130,309 290,136 270,220
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 147,838 $ 197,317 $ 341,263 $ 334,205
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,479 $ 1,973 $ 3,413 $ 3,342
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 146,359 $ 195,344 $ 337,850 $ 330,863
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 587.79 $ 784.52 $1,356.83 $1,328.77
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 16,271 $1,594,369 $1,610,640
Distributions (2,370) (234,595) (236,965)
Net income 3,413 337,850 341,263
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 17,314 $1,697,624 $1,714,938
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 341,263 $ 334,205
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 39,433 40,261
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 53,901 (35,056)
Accounts payable 15,610 16,515
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 450,207 355,925
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (3,417) (4,269)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 467
--------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (3,417) (3,802)
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (236,965) (354,330)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 209,825 (2,207)
Cash at beginning of period 174,638 200,529
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 384,463 $ 198,322
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized
in 1988 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1989.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 5% to $625,806 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $598,423 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
6
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 15,090 barrels
of oil, 4,484 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 28,101 mcf of gas were
sold, or 24,258 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 15,271 barrels of oil, 8,042 barrels of NGLs and 30,899 mcf of
gas were sold, or 28,463 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased slightly from $27.54 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.55 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.26, or 16%, from $14.01
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.27 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 131% from $2.11 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.88 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility in the foreseeable future. The
Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at average
prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended June 30,
2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $290,136 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $270,220 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$19,916, or 7%. This increase was due to an increase in production costs, offset
by declines in depletion and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $235,058 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$212,006 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $23,052 increase, or 11%.
The increase was the result of additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production and higher production taxes due to higher
oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
13%, from $17,953 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $15,645 for the same
period in 2001 due to a decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $39,433 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$40,261 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $828, or 2%. This decrease
was due to a decline in oil production of 181 barrels for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 12% to $286,574 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $324,217 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and a decline in
the average price received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
gas and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 7,491 barrels of oil,
7
2,446 barrels of NGLs and 13,463 mcf of gas were sold, or 12,181 BOEs. For the
three months ended June 30, 2000, 8,143 barrels of oil, 4,278 barrels of NGLs
and 15,250 mcf of gas were sold, or 14,963 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.67, or 2%, from $27.83
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.16 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.13, or
1%, from $13.99 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.12 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 46% to
$3.61 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.48 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $141,490 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $130,309 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$11,181, or 9%. This increase was due to increases in production costs and
depletion, offset by a decrease in G&A.
Production costs were $113,938 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$101,258 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $12,680 increase, or 13%.
The increase was due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate
well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 26%, from $9,727 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $7,164 for the same period in 2001 due to a decrease in audit
and tax fees.
Depletion was $20,388 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$19,324 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,064, or 6%. This increase
was attributable to a decline in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil
production of 652 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared
to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $94,282 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $26,974 and
reductions in working capital of $88,052 and G&A expenses of $2,308, offset by
an increase in production costs of $23,052. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $103,907 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $76,933 resulting from
the decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
The increase in production costs was primarily due to additional well
maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production and
increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices. The
decrease in G&A was primarily due to a decrease in audit and tax fees.
8
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on several oil and
gas properties.
Proceeds of $467 recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2000 were due
to equipment credits on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$236,965, of which $2,370 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$234,595 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $354,330, of which $3,543 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $350,787 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
9
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations,
partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 88, L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---- ----
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 174,638 $ 200,529
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 190,189 115,936
----------- -----------
Total current assets 364,827 316,465
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 7,348,142 7,339,803
Accumulated depletion (6,092,889) (6,015,639)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,255,253 1,324,164
----------- -----------
$ 1,620,080 $ 1,640,629
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 9,440 $ 16,379
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 16,271 16,407
Limited partners (249 interests) 1,594,369 1,607,843
----------- -----------
1,610,640 1,624,250
----------- -----------
$ 1,620,080 $ 1,640,629
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $1,311,024 $ 805,538 $ 645,636
Interest 14,327 8,390 9,025
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- 237
---------- ---------- ----------
1,325,351 813,928 654,898
---------- ---------- ----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 425,425 361,694 390,754
General and administrative 33,284 24,166 17,997
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 118,049
Depletion 77,250 140,915 327,453
---------- ---------- ----------
535,959 526,775 854,253
---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 789,392 $ 287,153 $ (199,355)
========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 7,894 $ 2,872 $ (1,994)
========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 781,498 $ 284,281 $ (197,361)
========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 3,138.55 $ 1,141.69 $ (792.61)
========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- -------- --------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 21,549 $2,116,932 $2,138,481
Distributions (2,892) (286,347) (289,239)
Net loss (1,994) (197,361) (199,355)
------ -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 16,663 1,633,224 1,649,887
Distributions (3,128) (309,662) (312,790)
Net income 2,872 284,281 287,153
------ -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 16,407 1,607,843 1,624,250
Distributions (8,030) (794,972) (803,002)
Net income 7,894 781,498 789,392
------ -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 16,271 $1,594,369 $1,610,640
======= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 789,392 $ 287,153 $(199,355)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 118,049
Depletion 77,250 140,915 327,453
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- (237)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (74,253) (50,145) 43,119
Accounts payable (6,939) 4,823 (9,123)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 785,450 382,746 279,906
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (8,806) (9,360) (14,794)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 467 -- 237
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (8,339) (9,360) (14,557)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (803,002) (312,790) (289,239)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (25,891) 60,596 (23,890)
Cash at beginning of year 200,529 139,933 163,823
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 174,638 $ 200,529 $ 139,933
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 88, L.P. (the "Partnership") was
organized in 1988 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas
and was converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1989. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
7
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentation.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
8
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $118,049 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $148,226 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- -------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 789,392 $ 287,153 $(199,355)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax reporting
purposes less than amounts for financial reporting
purposes 67,335 130,790 319,019
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 118,049
Other, net (1,469) 221 78
--------- --------- -------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 855,258 $ 418,164 $ 237,791
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- -------
Development costs $ 8,806 $ 9,360 $ 14,794
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---- ----
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 76,042 $ 76,042
Completed wells and equipment 7,272,100 7,263,761
--------- ---------
7,348,142 7,339,803
Accumulated depletion (6,092,889) (6,015,639)
----------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,255,253 $ 1,324,164
========== ==========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- -----
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 164,648 $ 159,072 $ 153,460
Reimbursement of general and administrative expenses $ 29,882 $ 18,547 $ 14,864
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA
and the Partnership are parties to the Program agreement.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
--------------- -----------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
properties 9.09091% 90.90909%
All other revenues 24.242425% 75.757575%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.09091% 90.90909%
Operating costs, direct costs and general and
administrative expenses 24.242425% 75.757575%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 642,625 841,260
Revisions (223,184) (203,072)
Production (48,933) (61,718)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 370,508 576,470
Revisions 353,229 566,412
Production (48,802) (66,701)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 674,935 1,076,181
Revisions 142,138 (79,131)
Production (46,284) (59,532)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 770,789 937,518
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.25 per barrel of NGLs and $7.86 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $5,885,000 and undiscounted was $12,796,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 24,468 $ 16,797 $ 4,079
Future production costs (11,672) (9,146) (2,814)
-------- -------- --------
12,796 7,651 1,265
10% annual discount factor (6,911) (3,791) (504)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 5,885 $ 3,860 $ 761
======== ======== ========
11
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (886) $ (444) $ (255)
Net changes in prices and production costs 2,139 1,723 (1,538)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 898 2,410 (366)
Accretion of discount 386 76 273
Changes in production rates, timing and other (512) (666) (79)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 2,025 3,099 (1,965)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 3,860 761 2,726
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 5,885 $ 3,860 $ 761
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 55% 52% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 63%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 5% 21%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $52,075 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. The managing general partner is also responsible for
12
1% of the guaranty and loan commitment fees. In return, it is allocated
1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $9,960,000. Pioneer
USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership
capital less commission and organization and offering costs allocated to
the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs
and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the
extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 63% to $1,311,024 for 2000 as
compared to $805,538 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 30,403
barrels of oil, 15,881 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 59,532 mcf of
gas were sold, or 56,206 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 30,947
barrels of oil, 17,855 barrels of NGLs and 66,701 mcf of gas were sold, or
59,919 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.44, or 73%, from
$17.01 in 1999 to $29.45 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.29, or 67%, from $9.32 in 1999 to $15.61 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 67% from $1.69 in 1999 to $2.82 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $535,959 as compared to $526,775
in 1999, an increase of $9,184, or 2%. The increase was due to increases in
production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a
decline in depletion.
Production costs were $425,425 in 2000 and $361,694 in 1999, resulting in a
$63,731 increase, or 18%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
38% from $24,166 in 1999 to $33,284 in 2000, primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $29,882 in 2000 and $18,547 in
1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $77,250 in 2000 compared to $140,915 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $63,665, or 45%. This decrease was primarily due to a 111,058
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 25% to $805,538 from
$645,636 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received. In 1999, 30,947 barrels of oil, 17,855 barrels of NGLs and 66,701 mcf
of gas
were sold, or 59,919 BOEs. In 1998, 33,377 barrels of oil, 15,556 barrels of
NGLs and 61,718 mcf of gas were sold, or 59,219 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.70, or 28%, from
$13.31 in 1998 to $17.01 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.53, or 37%, from $6.79 in 1998 to $9.32 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 9% from $1.55 in 1998 to $1.69 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $526,775 as compared to $854,253
in 1998, a decrease of $327,478, or 38%. The decrease was due to declines in
depletion, the impairment of oil and gas properties and production costs, offset
by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $361,694 in 1999 and $390,754 in 1998, resulting in a
$29,060 decrease, or 7%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production taxes due to
increased oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 34% from $17,997 in 1998 to $24,166 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $18,547 in
1999 and $14,864 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $118,049 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $140,915 in 1999 compared to $327,453 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $186,538, or 57%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 220,875 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $402,704 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $511,423, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $63,731, G&A expenses paid of $9,118 and working capital of $35,870. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $578,466 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $67,043 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to
higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited
to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on several oil and gas properties.
Proceeds recognized during 2000 of $467 were due to equipment credits received
on an active property.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $803,002, of which $8,030 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $794,972 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $312,790, of which
$3,128 was distributed to the managing general partner and $309,662 to the
limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 88, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 625,806 $ 598,423 $1,311,024 $ 805,538 $ 645,636 $ 940,268 $1,151,975
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 118,049 $ 791,857 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 341,263 $ 334,205 $ 789,392 $ 287,153 $ (199,355) $ (485,703) $ 480,356
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 3,413 $ 3,342 $ 7,894 $ 2,872 $ (1,994) $ (4,857) $ 4,804
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 337,850 $ 330,863 $ 781,498 $ 284,281 $ (197,361) $ (480,846) $ 475,552
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 1,356.83 $ 1,328.77 $ 3,138.55 $ 1,141.69 $ (792.61) $(1,931.11) $ 1,909.85
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 942.15 $ 1,408.78 $ 3,192.66 $ 1,243.62 $ 1,149.99 $ 2,376.82 $ 2,312.00
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,739,988 $1,637,019 $1,620,080 $1,640,629 $1,661,443 $2,159,160 $3,237,747
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
---------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
---------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
89-A Conv., L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October
12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 2,797
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 2,993
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding $ 929
Pioneer USA(a),(b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b),(c) $332.08
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for 3.53 times
the past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b),(c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $166.00
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $158.81
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c),(d) $310.02
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c),(e) $322.33
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 149
(c),(f)
---------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP, of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2039, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 100,729 $ 49,781
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 39,777 57,620
---------- ----------
Total current assets 140,506 107,401
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 2,151,488 2,205,981
Accumulated depletion (1,816,974) (1,860,437)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 334,514 345,544
---------- ----------
$ 475,020 $ 452,945
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 5,953 $ 4,194
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 4,759 4,556
Limited partners (2,797 interests) 464,308 444,195
---------- ----------
469,067 448,751
---------- ----------
$ 475,020 $ 452,945
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
--------------------- ---------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 82,496 $ 88,880 $ 192,720 $ 169,889
Interest 765 955 1,649 1,725
Gain on disposition of assets - 2,083 3,713 2,083
-------- -------- -------- --------
83,261 91,918 198,082 173,697
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 40,659 40,401 74,044 71,809
General and administrative 2,476 2,816 6,388 5,257
Depletion 5,746 4,524 11,750 10,851
Abandoned property (72) - 2,263 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
48,809 47,741 94,445 87,917
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 34,452 $ 44,177 $ 103,637 $ 85,780
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 344 $ 442 $ 1,036 $ 858
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 34,108 $ 43,735 $ 102,601 $ 84,922
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 12.19 $ 15.63 $ 36.68 $ 30.36
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 4,556 $ 444,195 $ 448,751
Distributions (833) (82,488) (83,321)
Net income 1,036 102,601 103,637
-------- -------- --------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 4,759 $ 464,308 $ 469,067
======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 103,637 $ 85,780
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 11,750 10,851
Gain on disposition of assets (3,713) (2,083)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 17,843 (3,607)
Accounts payable 5,472 3,811
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 134,989 94,752
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (720) (1,173)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 2,083
--------- ---------
Net cash provided (used in) by
investing activities (720) 910
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (83,321) (102,690)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 50,948 (7,028)
Cash at beginning of period 49,781 58,311
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 100,729 $ 51,283
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in 1989 as a
general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was converted to a
Delaware limited partnership in 1990.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 13% to $192,720 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $169,889 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
6
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 3,972 barrels
of oil, 1,804 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 11,172 mcf of gas were
sold, or 7,638 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June
30, 2000, 4,172 barrels of oil, 2,251 barrels of NGLs and 10,163 mcf of gas were
sold, or 8,117 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.21, or 1%, from $27.56
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.77 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.76, or 6%, from $13.74
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.50 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 114% from $2.35 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.03 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Gains on disposition of assets of $3,713 and $2,083 were recognized during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during the period ended June 30, 2001 was due to salvage income received on one
well plugged and abandoned during the current period. The gain recognized during
the period ended June 30, 2000 was from equipment credits received on one fully
depleted well. Abandoned property costs of $2,263 were incurred during 2001 to
plug and abandon this well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $94,445 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $87,917 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $6,528,
or 7%. This increase was due to increases in abandoned property costs,
production costs, general and administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $74,044 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared
to $71,809 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $2,235 increase, or 3%.
This increase was primarily due to higher workover expenses incurred to
stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
22% from $5,257 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $6,388 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $11,750 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$10,851 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $899, or 8%. This increase
was the result of a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June 30,
2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of 200
barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in
2000.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 7% to $82,496 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $88,880 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
NGLs and a decrease in production, offset by higher average prices received for
gas. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 1,795 barrels of oil, 965 barrels
of NGLs and 5,567 mcf of gas were sold, or 3,688 BOEs. For the three months
ended June 30, 2000, 2,094 barrels of oil, 1,179 barrels of NGLs and 5,406 mcf
of gas were sold, or 4,174 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.27, or 1%, from $27.65
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.38 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $1.65, or
12%, from $13.65 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $12.00 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 42% to
$3.90 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.75 during the same
period in 2000.
Gains on disposition of assets of $2,083 were attributable to equipment credits
received on one fully depleted well for the three months ended June 30, 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $48,809 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $47,741 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$1,068, or 2%. This increase was due to increases in depletion and production
costs, offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $40,659 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$40,401 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $258 increase. This increase
was the result of additional workover costs incurred to stimulate well
production, offset by lower well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A decreased 12% from $2,816 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $2,476 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a decline
in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $5,746 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$4,524 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,222, or 27%. This increase
was the result of a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June 30,
2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of 299
barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period
in 2000.
8
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $40,237 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period in 2000. This increase resulted
from an increase of $22,755 in oil and gas sales receipts and a reduction in
working capital of $23,111, offset by increases in production costs of $2,235,
G&A expenses of $1,131 and abandoned property costs of $2,263. The increase in
oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001
which contributed an additional $29,717 to oil and gas receipts, offset by
$6,962 resulting from the decline in production during 2001 as compared to the
same period in 2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to
higher workover costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A
was primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A
being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased
oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on
various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from salvage income of $2,083 were recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$83,321, of which $833 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$82,488 was distributed to the limited partners. For the same period ended June
30, 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $102,690, of which $1,027 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $101,663 was distributed to the
limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
9
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv.,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 49,781 $ 58,311
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 57,620 37,719
----------- -----------
Total current assets 107,401 96,030
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 2,205,981 2,203,522
Accumulated depletion (1,860,437) (1,832,074)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 345,544 371,448
----------- -----------
$ 452,945 $ 467,478
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 4,194 $ 5,804
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 4,556 4,685
Limited partners (2,797 interests) 444,195 456,989
----------- -----------
448,751 461,674
----------- -----------
$ 452,945 $ 467,478
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 383,529 $ 241,781 $ 196,186
Interest 4,022 2,353 2,629
Gain on disposition of assets 1,765 1,483 648
--------- --------- ---------
389,316 245,617 199,463
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 135,124 118,700 121,865
General and administrative 12,370 9,612 7,006
Impairment of oil and gas properties 6,198 -- 103,108
Depletion 22,165 39,348 117,246
--------- --------- ---------
175,857 167,660 349,225
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 213,459 $ 77,957 $(149,762)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 2,135 $ 780 $ (1,498)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 211,324 $ 77,177 $(148,264)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 75.55 $ 27.59 $ (53.01)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 7,016 $ 687,886 $ 694,902
Distributions (806) (79,919) (80,725)
Net loss (1,498) (148,264) (149,762)
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 4,712 459,703 464,415
Distributions (807) (79,891) (80,698)
Net income 780 77,177 77,957
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 4,685 456,989 461,674
Distributions (2,264) (224,118) (226,382)
Net income 2,135 211,324 213,459
--------- --------- ---------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 4,556 $ 444,195 $ 448,751
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 213,459 $ 77,957 $(149,762)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 22,165 39,348 117,246
Impairment of oil and gas properties 6,198 -- 103,108
Gain on disposition of assets (1,765) (1,483) (648)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (19,901) (15,731) 6,119
Accounts payable (1,610) (17) (3,072)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 218,546 100,074 72,991
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
(Additions) deletions to oil and gas properties (2,459) 197 (9,993)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 1,765 1,483 648
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities (694) 1,680 (9,345)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (226,382) (80,698) (80,725)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (8,530) 21,056 (17,079)
Cash at beginning of year 58,311 37,255 54,334
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 49,781 $ 58,311 $ 37,255
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in
1989 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1990. The Partnership's managing
general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
7
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
8
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $6,198 and $103,108
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000 and 1998, respectively.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $52,175 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 213,459 $ 77,957 $(149,762)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 18,394 35,333 113,374
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 6,198 -- 103,108
Other, net (560) (1,305) 1,416
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 237,491 $ 111,985 $ 68,136
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ------
Development costs $ 2,459 $ 4,107 $5,690
========= ========= ======
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 93,966 $ 93,966
Completed wells and equipment 2,112,015 2,109,556
----------- -----------
2,205,981 2,203,522
Accumulated depletion (1,860,437) (1,832,074)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 345,544 $ 371,448
=========== ===========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $52,987 $52,678 $51,730
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $10,994 $ 7,203 $ 5,808
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 89-A Conv., Ltd. ("EMPL"), Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. and the
Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement. EMPL is a
limited partnership organized for the benefit of certain employees of Pioneer
USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000,
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
--------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
and general and administrative expenses -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.
is 25.166457% and 74.833543%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 189,854 326,511
Revisions (83,618) (110,279)
Production (14,102) (21,106)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 92,134 195,126
Revisions 106,866 158,479
Production (14,166) (20,484)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 184,834 333,121
Revisions 30,916 (27,906)
Production (13,092) (20,057)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 202,658 285,158
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $12.34 per barrel of NGLs and $8.31 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $1,685,000 and undiscounted $3,469,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
11
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 6,835 $ 4,546 $ 1,057
Future production costs (3,367) (2,613) (750)
------- ------- -------
3,468 1,933 307
10% annual discount factor (1,783) (891) (101)
------- ------- -------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 1,685 $ 1,042 $ 206
======= ======= =======
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (248) $ (123) $ (74)
Net changes in prices and production costs 765 461 (511)
Revisions of estimated future development costs -- -- --
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 196 720 (138)
Accretion of discount 104 20 87
Changes in production rates, timing and other (174) (242) (27)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 643 836 (663)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 1,042 206 869
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 1,685 $ 1,042 $ 206
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil and
gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10% of
total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Plains Marketing, L.P. 63% 62% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 59%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 3% 12%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $22,502 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The
12
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the
Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $2,797,000. The
managing general partner is required to contribute amounts equal to 1%
of initial Partnership capital less commission and organization and
offering costs allocated to the limited partners and to contribute
amounts necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the
Partnership agreement to the extent its share of revenues does not cover
such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 59% to $383,529 for 2000 as
compared to $241,781 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 8,466
barrels of oil, 4,626 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 20,057 mcf of
gas were sold, or 16,435 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 9,190
barrels of oil, 4,976 barrels of NGLs and 20,484 mcf of gas were sold, or 17,580
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.48, or 73%, from
$17.11 in 1999 to $29.59 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.88, or 62%, from $9.54 in 1999 to $15.42 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 70% from $1.81 in 1999 to $3.07 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
During 2000 and 1999, gains on disposition of assets of $1,765 and $1,483,
respectively, were attributable to credits received from equipment salvage on
one fully depleted well in each year.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $175,856 as compared to $167,660
in 1999, an increase of $8,196, or 5%. The increase was due to increases in
production costs, the impairment of oil and gas properties and general and
administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $135,124 in 2000 and $118,700 in 1999, resulting in a
$16,424 increase, or 14%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional workover and well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
29% from $9,612 in 1999 to $12,370 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $10,994 in 2000 and $7,203 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $6,198 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $22,165 in 2000 as compared to $39,348 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $17,183, or 44%. This decrease was primarily due to a 28,723 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 23% to $241,781 from
$196,186 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received. In 1999, 9,190 barrels of oil, 4,976 barrels of natural gas liquids
("NGLs") and 20,484 mcf of gas were sold, or 17,580 barrel of oil equivalents
("BOEs"). In 1998, 9,782 barrels of oil, 4,320 barrels of NGLs and 21,106 mcf of
gas were sold, or 17,620 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.88, or 29%, from
$13.23 in 1998 to $17.11 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.59, or 37%, from $6.95 in 1998 to $9.54 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 4% from $1.74 in 1998 to $1.81 in 1999.
During 1999, gain on disposition of assets of $1,483 was attributable to credits
received from equipment salvage on one active well. Gain on disposition of
assets of $648 was attributable to credits received in 1998 from the disposal of
oil and gas equipment on a well that was plugged and abandoned in a prior year.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $167,660 as compared to $349,225
in 1998, a decrease of $181,565, or 52%. The decrease was due to declines in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset by
an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $118,700 in 1999 and $121,865 in 1998, resulting in a
$3,165 decrease, or 3%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 37% from $7,006 in 1998 to $9,612 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $7,203 in
1999 and $5,808 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $103,108 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $39,348 in 1999 compared to $117,246 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $77,898, or 66%. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in
proved reserves of 70,433 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $118,472 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $143,417, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $16,424, G&A expenses paid of $2,758 and working capital of $5,763. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $171,552 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $28,135 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and workover and well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily
due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated
(limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas
revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were
related to equipment upgrades on active properties.
During 2000 and 1999, proceeds from disposition of assets of $1,765 and $1,483,
respectively, were from equipment credits received on an active well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $226,382, of which $2,264 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $224,118 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $80,698, of which
$807 was distributed to the managing general partner and $79,891 to the limited
partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A CONV., L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 192,720 $ 169,889 $ 383,529 $ 241,781 $ 196,186 $ 288,192 $ 381,014
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 6,198 $ -- $ 103,108 $ 178,895 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 103,637 $ 85,780 $ 213,459 $ 77,957 $ (149,762) $ (90,749) $ 163,974
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,036 $ 858 $ 2,135 $ 780 $ (1,498) $ (907) $ 1,640
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 102,601 $ 84,922 $ 211,324 $ 77,177 $ (148,264) $ (89,842) $ 162,334
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 36.68 $ 30.36 $ 75.55 $ 27.59 $ (53.01) $ (32.12) $ 58.04
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 29.49 $ 36.35 $ 80.13 $ 28.56 $ 28.57 $ 62.59 $ 68.91
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 475,020 $ 454,379 $ 452,945 $ 467,478 $ 465,932 $ 703,794 $ 970,154
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
89-A, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 89-A, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 8,317
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 8,902
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 2,732
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 332.67
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for 3.49 times
the past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 166.58
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 159.61
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 310.60
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 322.91
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 149
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2039, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-26097-01
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
-----------------------------
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2297058
--------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000........................................ 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000....................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001....................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000.................................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................... 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations....................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K............................ 11
Signatures.................................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 306,773 $ 154,704
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 118,280 171,226
---------- ----------
Total current assets 425,053 325,930
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 6,397,540 6,559,576
Accumulated depletion (5,402,591) (5,531,818)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 994,949 1,027,758
---------- ----------
$ 1,420,002 $ 1,353,688
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 20,349 $ 12,645
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 14,188 13,602
Limited partners (8,317 interests) 1,385,465 1,327,441
---------- ----------
1,399,653 1,341,043
---------- ----------
$ 1,420,002 $ 1,353,688
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 245,398 $ 264,301 $ 573,213 $ 505,131
Interest 2,350 2,930 5,026 5,297
Gain on disposition of assets - 6,194 11,040 6,194
-------- -------- ------- --------
247,748 273,425 589,279 516,622
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 120,918 120,113 219,851 213,496
General and administrative 7,577 8,814 19,284 16,272
Depletion 17,132 13,489 34,950 32,289
Abandoned property - - 8,824 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
145,627 142,416 282,909 262,057
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 102,121 $ 131,009 $ 306,370 $ 254,565
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,022 $ 1,310 $ 3,064 $ 2,546
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 101,099 $ 129,699 $ 303,306 $ 252,019
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 12,16 $ 15.59 $ 36.47 $ 30.30
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 13,602 $1,327,441 $1,341,043
Distributions (2,478) (245,282) (247,760)
Net income 3,064 303,306 306,370
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 14,188 $1,385,465 $1,399,653
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
--------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 306,370 $ 254,565
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 34,950 32,289
Gain on disposition of assets (11,040) (6,194)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 52,946 (10,715)
Accounts payable 18,744 11,899
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 401,970 281,844
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (2,141) (3,488)
Proceeds from disposition of assets - 6,194
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities (2,141) 2,706
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (247,760) (305,356)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 152,069 (20,806)
Cash at beginning of period 154,704 180,301
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 306,773 $ 159,495
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1989 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 13% to $573,213 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $505,131 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 11,811 barrels
7
of oil, 5,378 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 33,232 mcf of gas were
sold, or 22,728 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 12,412 barrels of oil, 6,682 barrels of NGLs and 30,228 mcf of
gas were sold, or 24,132 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.21, or 1%, from $27.56
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.77 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.76, or 6%, from $13.74
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.50 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 114% from $2.35 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.03 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Gains on disposition of assets of $11,040 and $6,194 were recognized during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during 2001 was due to salvage income received from one well plugged and
abandoned during the current period. The gain recognized during 2000 was from
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well. Abandoned property costs
of $8,824 were incurred during 2001 to plug and abandon this well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $282,909 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $262,057 for the same period in 2000, resulting in an
increase of $20,852, or 8%. This increase was due to increases in abandoned
property costs, production costs, general and administrative expenses ("G&A")
and depletion.
Production costs were $219,851 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$213,496 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $6,355 increase, or 3%. The
increase was primarily due to higher workover expenses incurred to stimulate
well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
19% from $16,272 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $19,284 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $34,950 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$32,289 for the same period in 2000, an increase in depletion of $2,661, or 8%.
This increase was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves during the
period ended June 30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decrease
in oil production of 601 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000.
8
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 7% to $245,398 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $264,301 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in production and lower average
prices received for oil and NGLs, offset by an increase in the average price
received for gas. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 5,345 barrels of
oil, 2,870 barrels of NGLs and 16,567 mcf of gas were sold, or 10,976 BOEs. For
the three months ended June 30, 2000, 6,233 barrels of oil, 3,495 barrels of
NGLs and 16,086 mcf of gas were sold, or 12,409 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.27, or 1%, from $27.65
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.38 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $1.65, or 12%, from
$13.65 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $12.00 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 42% from $2.75
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.90 for the same period in
2001.
Gains on disposition of assets of $6,194 were recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $145,627 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $142,416 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$3,211, or 2%. This increase was due to increases in depletion and production
costs, offset by a decline in G&A.
Production costs were $120,918 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$120,113 for the same period in 2000 resulting in an $805 increase. This
increase was primarily due to higher workover costs incurred to stimulate well
production, offset by lower well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A decreased 14% from $8,814 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $7,577 for the same period in 2001 due to a decline in audit
and tax fees.
Depletion was $17,132 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$13,489 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $3,643, or 27%. This
increase was primarily due to downward revisions to proved reserves during the
period ended June 30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in
oil production of 888 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as
compared to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $120,126 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase of $67,811 in oil and gas sales receipts and a
9
reduction in working capital of $70,506, offset by increases in abandoned
property costs of $8,824, production costs of $6,355 and G&A expenses of $3,012.
The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity
prices during 2001 which contributed an additional $88,303 to oil and gas
receipts, offset by $20,492 resulting from the decrease in production during
2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in production costs
was primarily due to higher workover expenses incurred to stimulate well
production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to a higher percentage of the
managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit
and tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 were related to upgrades of oil and gas equipment on active properties.
Proceeds from salvage income of $6,194 were recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$247,760, of which $2,478 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$245,282 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $305,356, of which $3,054 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $302,302 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
10
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 8, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
---------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-26097-01
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2297058
------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES /X/ NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. /X/
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$8,212,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 8,317.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1989 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 8,317 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 63% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and
2
ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that could expose the
Partnership to substantial liability due to pollution and other environmental
damages. Although the Partnership believes that its business operations do not
impair environmental quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable
environmental regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot
predict what, if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its
current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located in
the Spraberry Trend area of West Texas were acquired by the Partnership,
resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 33 oil and gas
wells. One well has been plugged and abandoned. At December 31, 2000, 32 wells
were producing.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 8,317 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 609 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $666,425 and $237,558, respectively,
of such revenue-related distributions were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $1,140,280 $ 718,969 $ 583,396 $ 856,926 $1,132,944
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ 18,391 $ - $ 306,826 $ 531,929 $ -
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 634.127 $ 231,838 $ (444,718) $ (269,363) $ 488,019
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 6,341 $ 2,318 $ (4,447) $ (2,693) $ 4,880
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 627,786 $ 229,520 $ (440,271) $ (266,670) $ 483,139
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 75.48 $ 27.60 $ (52.94) $ (32.06) $ 58.09
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 80.13 $ 28.56 $ 28.57 $ 62.59 $ 68.92
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $1,353,688 $1,397,183 $1,392,439 $2,099,131 $2,890,740
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 59% to $1,140,280 for 2000 as
compared to $718,969 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 25,176
barrels of oil, 13,747 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 59,638 mcf of
gas were sold, or 48,863 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 27,333
barrels of oil, 14,796 barrels of NGLs and 60,905 mcf of gas were sold, or
52,280 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.48, or 73%, from
$17.11 in 1999 to $29.59 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.88, or 62%, from $9.54 in 1999 to $15.42 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 70% from $1.81 in 1999 to $3.07 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gains on disposition of assets of $5,248 and $4,410 in 2000 and 1999,
respectively, were attributable to equipment credits on one fully depleted well
in each year.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $523,646 as compared to $498,672
in 1999, an increase of $24,974, or 5%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs, the impairment of oil and gas properties and
general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $402,118 in 2000 and $352,977 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $49,141, or 14%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional workover and well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
31% from $28,521 in 1999 to $37,259 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $32,691 in 2000 and $21,420 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $18,391 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $65,878 in 2000 as compared to $117,174 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $51,296, or 44%. This decrease was primarily due to a 85,285 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 23% to $718,969 from
$583,396 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 27,333 barrels of oil,
14,796 barrels of NGLs and 60,905 mcf of gas were sold, or 52,280 BOEs. In 1998,
29,084 barrels of oil, 12,847 barrels of NGLs and 62,751 mcf of gas were sold,
or 52,390 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.88, or 29%, from
$13.23 in 1998 to $17.11 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.59, or 37%, from $6.95 in 1998 to $9.54 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 4% from $1.74 in 1998 to $1.81 in 1999.
Gain on disposition of assets of $4,410 in 1999 was attributable to equipment
credits on one fully depleted well. During 1998, gain on disposition of assets
of $1,926 was attributable to credits received from the disposal of oil and gas
equipment on a well that was plugged and abandoned in a prior year.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $498,672 as compared to $1,038,152
in 1998, a decrease of $539,480, or 52%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $352,977 in 1999 and $362,377 in 1998, resulting in a
$9,400 decrease, or 3%. The decrease was due to declines in ad valorem taxes and
well maintenance costs, offset by an increase in workover costs incurred to
stimulate well production and an increase in production taxes due to increased
oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 38% from $20,635 in 1998 to $28,521 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $21,420 in
1999 and $17,270 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $306,826 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1998.
6
Depletion was $117,174 in 1999 compared to $348,314 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $231,140, or 66%. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in
proved reserves of 209,480 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $351,738 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $426,425, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $49,141, G&A expenses paid of $8,738 and working capital of $16,808. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $510,320 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $83,895 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional workover and well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was
primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were related to
expenditures for equipment upgrades on active oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $5,248 and $4,410 recognized in 2000 and
1999, respectively, were from equipment credits received on one fully depleted
well in each year.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $673,157, of which $6,732 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $666,425 to the limited
partners. For 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $239,958, of which
$2,400 was distributed to the managing general partner and $237,558 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 13
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 154,704 $ 180,301
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 171,226 112,165
----------- -----------
Total current assets 325,930 292,466
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 6,559,576 6,552,266
Accumulated depletion (5,531,818) (5,447,549)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,027,758 1,104,717
----------- -----------
$ 1,353,688 $ 1,397,183
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 12,645 $ 17,110
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 13,602 13,993
Limited partners (8,317 interests) 1,327,441 1,366,080
----------- -----------
1,341,043 1,380,073
----------- -----------
$ 1,353,688 $ 1,397,183
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $1,140,280 $ 718,969 $ 583,396
Interest 12,245 7,131 8,112
Gain on disposition of assets 5,248 4,410 1,926
---------- ---------- -----------
1,157,773 730,510 593,434
---------- ---------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 402,118 352,977 362,377
General and administrative 37,259 28,521 20,635
Impairment of oil and gas properties 18,391 - 306,826
Depletion 65,878 117,174 348,314
---------- ---------- -----------
523,646 498,672 1,038,152
---------- ---------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 634,127 $ 231,838 $ (444,718)
========== ========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 6,341 $ 2,318 $ (4,447)
========== ========== ===========
Limited partners $ 627,786 $ 229,520 $ (440,271)
========== ========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 75.48 $ 27.60 $ (52.94)
========== ========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 20,922 $ 2,052,031 $ 2,072,953
Distributions (2,400) (237,642) (240,042)
Net loss (4,447) (440,271) (444,718)
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 14,075 1,374,118 1,388,193
Distributions (2,400) (237,558) (239,958)
Net income 2,318 229,520 231,838
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 13,993 1,366,080 1,380,073
Distributions (6,732) (666,425) (673,157)
Net income 6,341 627,786 634,127
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 13,602 $ 1,327,441 $ 1,341,043
======== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 634,127 $ 231,838 $(444,718)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 18,391 - 306,826
Depletion 65,878 117,174 348,314
Gain on disposition of assets (5,248) (4,410) (1,926)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (59,061) (46,785) 18,178
Accounts payable (4,465) 67 (9,135)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 649,622 297,884 217,539
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
(Additions) deletions to oil and gas properties (7,310) 584 (29,716)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 5,248 4,410 1,926
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (2,062) 4,994 (27,790)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (673,157) (239,958) (240,042)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (25,597) 62,920 (50,293)
Cash at beginning of year 180,301 117,381 167,674
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 154,704 $ 180,301 $ 117,381
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1989 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves evaluated by independent petroleum consultants. The
carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $18,391 and $306,826
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000 and 1998, respectively.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $155,457 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
15
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 634,127 $ 231,838 $(444,718)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 54,665 105,234 336,801
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 18,391 - 306,826
Salvage income - - -
Other, net (1,709) (3,610) 3,948
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 705,474 $ 333,462 $ 202,857
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the net costs incurred, whether capitalized
or expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- -------- --------
Development costs $ 7,310 $ 12,213 $ 16,919
========= ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 279,410 $ 279,410
Completed wells and equipment 6,280,166 6,272,856
----------- -----------
6,559,576 6,552,266
Accumulated depletion (5,531,818) (5,447,549)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,027,758 $ 1,104,717
=========== ===========
16
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 157,560 $ 156,639 $ 153,822
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 32,691 $ 21,420 $ 17,270
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 89-A Conv., Ltd. ("EMPL"), Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv., L.P. and
the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement. EMPL
is a limited partnership organized for the benefit of certain employees of
Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
--------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs
and all other costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 105 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 89-A Conv.,
L.P. is 74.833543% and 25.166457%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared Williamson Petroleum
Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 564,653 971,094
Revisions (248,699) (328,006)
Production (41,931) (62,751)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 274,023 580,337
Revisions 317,834 471,328
Production (42,129) (60,905)
-------- --------
17
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 549,728 990,760
Revisions 91,729 (83,266)
Production (38,923) (59,638)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 602,534 847,856
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $12.34 per barrel of NGLs and $8.31 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $5,009,000 and undiscounted was $10,314,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 20,322 $ 13,520 $ 3,146
Future production costs (10,008) (7,771) (2,232)
-------- -------- -------
10,314 5,749 914
10% annual discount factor (5,305) (2,649) (301)
-------- -------- -------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 5,009 $ 3,100 $ 613
======== ======== =======
18
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (738) $ (366) $ (221)
Net changes in prices and production costs 2,277 1,372 (1,520)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 582 2,141 (409)
Accretion of discount 310 62 259
Changes in production rates, timing and other (522) (722) (81)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,909 2,487 (1,972)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 3,100 613 2,585
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 5,009 $ 3,100 $ 613
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- -------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 63% 62% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 59%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 3% 12%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $66,937 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general
partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all production
expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays
1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1%
of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
19
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $8,317,000.
The managing general partner is required to contribute amounts equal to 1%
of initial Partnership capital less commission and offering expenses
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to
the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 45 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of Texas
with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until August 1997.
From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October 1996,
he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From June 1988
to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B.S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 15% during the first three years
and approximately 20% after three years of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, they are allocated approximately 15% during
the first three years and approximately 20% after three years of the Program's
revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 105 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
23
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $157,560 $ 156,639 $153,822
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 32,691 $ 21,420 $ 17,270
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the required
information is in the financial statements or notes thereto, or is not
applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
Dated: March 27, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 27, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 27, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership -
of Parker & Parsley 89-A, L.P. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit A of the Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of Limited Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit C of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of General Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit D of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference -
to Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4c
of the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
10(b) Form of Development Drilling Program -
Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit
B of the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-A, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 573,213 $ 505,131 $1,140,280 $ 718,969 $ 583,396 $ 856,926 $1,132,944
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ 18,391 $ -- $ 306,826 $ 531,929 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 306,370 $ 254,565 $ 634,127 $ 231,838 $ (444,718) $ (269,363) $ 488,019
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 3,064 $ 2,546 $ 6,341 $ 2,318 $ (4,447) $ (2,693) $ 4,880
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 303,306 $ 252,019 $ 627,786 $ 229,520 $ (440,271) $ (266,670) $ 483,139
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 36.47 $ 30.30 $ 75.48 $ 27.60 $ (52.94) $ (32.06) $ 58.09
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 29.49 $ 36.35 $ 80.13 $ 28.56 $ 28.57 $ 62.59 $ 68.92
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,420,002 $1,358,291 $1,353,688 $1,397,183 $1,392,439 $2,099,131 $2,890,740
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
89-B Conv., L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated
October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker & Parsley
89-B Conv., L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of
limited partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of
June 30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 6,307
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 5,875
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,761
USA(a),(b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b),(c) $ 280.15
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of 3.22 times
Distributions for the past four quarterly distributions including the
distribution in July 2001(b),(c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 177.67
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 171.00
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 259.26
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c),(e) $ 271.96
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 158
(c),(f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should not
assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the value
or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the operating
period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as in the
merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share of
the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3% of
the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July 13,
2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses represent
estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell the assets
of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs associated with
such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2039, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 218,824 $ 94,922
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 90,911 134,431
---------- ----------
Total current assets 309,735 229,353
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,317,534 5,314,971
Accumulated depletion (4,479,159) (4,443,011)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 838,375 871,960
---------- ----------
$ 1,148,110 $ 1,101,313
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 16,108 $ 11,787
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 11,466 11,042
Limited partners (6,307 interests) 1,120,536 1,078,484
---------- ----------
1,132,002 1,089,526
---------- ----------
$ 1,148,110 $ 1,101,313
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
--------------------- ---------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 189,915 $ 210,761 $ 432,217 $ 409,534
Interest 1,589 2,124 3,372 3,655
-------- -------- -------- --------
191,504 212,885 435,589 413,189
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 88,828 81,982 174,038 164,199
General and administrative 5,698 6,635 14,077 12,598
Depletion 17,560 16,551 36,148 31,840
-------- -------- -------- --------
112,086 105,168 224,263 208,637
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 79,418 $ 107,717 $ 211,326 $ 204,552
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 794 $ 1,078 $ 2,113 $ 2,046
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 78,624 $ 106,639 $ 209,213 $ 202,506
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 12.46 $ 16.91 $ 33.17 $ 32.11
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 11,042 $1,078,484 $1,089,526
Distributions (1,689) (167,161) (168,850)
Net income 2,113 209,213 211,326
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 11,466 $1,120,536 $1,132,002
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 211,326 $ 204,552
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 36,148 31,840
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 43,520 (27,521)
Accounts payable 4,321 9,590
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 295,315 218,461
-------- --------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (2,563) (7,505)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (168,850) (211,637)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 123,902 (681)
Cash at beginning of period 94,922 116,810
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 218,824 $ 116,129
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized as a general
partnership in 1989 under the laws of the State of Texas and was converted to a
Delaware limited partnership on May 30, 1990.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 6% to $432,217 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $409,534 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 9,172 barrels
6
of oil, 3,753 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 23,283 mcf of gas were
sold, or 16,806 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 10,168 barrels of oil, 5,936 barrels of NGLs and 21,901 mcf of
gas were sold, or 19,754 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.25, or 1%, from $27.44
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.69 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.09, or 22%, from
$13.93 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.02 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 125% from $2.18
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.91 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $224,263 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $208,637 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$15,626, or 7%. This increase was due to an increase in production costs,
depletion and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $174,038 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$164,199 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $9,839 increase, or 6%.
This increase was due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred
to stimulate well production and higher production taxes due to higher oil and
gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
12%, from $12,598 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $14,077 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $36,148 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$31,840 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $4,308, or 14%. This
increase was due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil
production of 996 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 10% to $189,915 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $210,761 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and lower
average prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
gas and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 4,471 barrels of oil,
1,969 barrels of NGLs and 10,803 mcf of gas were sold, or 8,241 BOEs. For the
7
three months ended June 30, 2000, 5,131 barrels of oil, 3,114 barrels of NGLs
and 10,684 mcf of gas were sold, or 10,026 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.78, or 3%, from $27.73
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.95 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.76, or
13%, from $13.12 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.88 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 44% to
$3.72 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.58 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $112,086 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $105,168 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$6,918, or 7%. This increase was due to increases in production costs and
depletion, offset by a decrease in G&A.
Production costs were $88,828 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$81,982 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $6,846 increase, or 8%. The
increase was due to an increase in well maintenance and workover costs incurred
to stimulate well production, offset by lower production taxes due to lower oil
prices.
During this period, G&A decreased 14%, from $6,635 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $5,698 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues and a
decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $17,560 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$16,551 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,009, or 6%. This increase
was attributable to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil
production of 660 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared
to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $76,854 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period in 2000. This increase was due
to an increase of $22,400 in oil and gas sales receipts and a reduction in
working capital of $65,772, offset by increases in production costs of $9,839
and G&A expenses of $1,479. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from
the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an additional
$80,365 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $57,965 resulting from the decline in
production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in
production costs was due to additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production and increased production taxes associated
with higher oil and gas prices. The increase in G&A was due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues and an
increase in audit and tax fees.
8
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on
various oil and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$168,850, of which $1,689 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$167,161 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $211,637, of which $2,116 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $209,521 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
9
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv.,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations,
partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv.,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
-------- ---------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 94,922 $ 116,810
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 134,431 73,499
---------- ----------
Total current assets 229,353 190,309
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,314,971 5,304,537
Accumulated depletion (4,443,011) (4,349,082)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 871,960 955,455
---------- ----------
$ 1,101,313 $ 1,145,764
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 11,787 $ 15,267
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 11,042 11,451
Limited partners (6,307 interests) 1,078,484 1,119,046
---------- ----------
1,089,526 1,130,497
---------- ----------
$ 1,101,313 $ 1,145,764
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------- -------- -------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 873,058 $ 542,232 $ 471,148
Interest 8,377 4,914 5,410
Gain on disposition of assets - 354 108
------- -------- -------
881,435 547,500 476,666
------- -------- -------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 326,082 305,897 322,354
General and administrative 28,155 20,352 16,076
Impairment of oil and gas properties 27,748 - 262,396
Depletion 66,181 99,538 241,875
------- -------- -------
448,166 425,787 842,701
------- -------- -------
Net income (loss) $ 433,269 $ 121,713 $(366,035)
======== ========= ========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 4,333 $ 1,217 $ (3,660)
======== ========= ========
Limited partners $ 428,936 $ 120,496 $(362,375)
======== ========= ========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership
interest $ 68.01 $ 19.11 $ (57.46)
======== ========= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
------------- -------------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 17,202 $1,688,386 $1,705,588
Distributions (1,765) (174,700) (176,465)
Net loss (3,660) (362,375) (366,035)
------ -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 11,777 1,151,311 1,163,088
Distributions (1,543) (152,761) (154,304)
Net income 1,217 120,496 121,713
------ -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 11,451 1,119,046 1,130,497
Distributions (4,742) (469,498) (474,240)
Net income 4,333 428,936 433,269
------ -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 11,042 $1,078,484 $1,089,526
======= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from operations:
Net income (loss) $ 433,269 $ 121,713 $(366,035)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 27,748 - 262,396
Depletion 66,181 99,538 241,875
Gain on disposition of assets - (354) (108)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (60,932) (20,669) 43,290
Accounts payable (3,480) 2,834 (6,986)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities 462,786 203,062 174,432
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (10,434) (7,556) (10,801)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 354 108
------- ------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities (10,434) (7,202) (10,693)
------- ------- -------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (474,240) (154,304) (176,465)
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (21,888) 41,556 (12,726)
Cash at beginning of year 116,810 75,254 87,980
------- ------- -------
Cash at end of year $ 94,922 $ 116,810 $ 75,254
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized as a
general partnership in 1989 under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Delaware limited partnership on May 30, 1990. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121. "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $27,748 and $262,396
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000 and 1998, respectively.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $191,325 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 433,269 $ 121,713 $(366,035)
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 27,748 - 262,396
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 57,991 91,381 226,609
Other, net (1,014) (2,514) 2,725
------- ------- -------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 517,994 $ 210,580 $ 125,695
======== ======== ========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Development costs $ 10,434 $ 7,556 $ 10,801
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
--------- ---------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 171,441 $ 171,441
Completed wells and equipment 5,143,530 5,133,096
---------- ----------
5,314,971 5,304,537
Accumulated depletion (4,443,011) (4,349,082)
----------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 871,960 $ 955,455
========== ==========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 133,513 $ 129,059 $ 124,312
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 25,658 $ 16,168 $ 14,082
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA
and P&P Employees 89-B Conv., L.P. ("EMPL"), Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. and the
Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement. EMPL is a
limited partnership organized for the benefit of certain employees of Pioneer
USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
--------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable
and depletable properties -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses
and general and administrative expenses -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 20 limited partner interests
owned by Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 89-B,
L.P. is 47.578455% and 52.421545%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 471,441 734,987
Revisions (202,204) (246,962)
Production (35,481) (52,345)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 233,756 435,680
Revisions 267,905 413,961
Production (32,585) (46,681)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 469,076 802,960
Revisions 1,942 (157,459)
Production (30,959) (42,179)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 440,059 603,322
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.35 per barrel of NGLs and $7.90 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $3,414,000 and undiscounted was $6,785,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 14,354 $ 11,715 $ 2,608
Future production costs (7,569) (6,914) (1,962)
-------- -------- --------
6,785 4,801 646
10% annual discount factor (3,371) (2,230) (224)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 3,414 $ 2,571 $ 422
========= ======== =========
11
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (547) $ (236) $ (149)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,522 1,145 (1,146)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (163) 1,753 (282)
Accretion of discount 257 42 189
Changes in production rates, timing and other (226) (555) (76)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 843 2,149 (1,464)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 2,571 422 1,886
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 3,414 $ 2,571 $ 422
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil and
gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10% of
total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 55% 51% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 59%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 6% 26%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $37,745 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general
partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all production
expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays
1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1%
of its operating, general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of
undistributed profits.
12
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $6,307,000. The managing
general partner is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial
Partnership capital less commission and organization and offering costs
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to
the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 61% to $873,058 for 2000 as
compared to $542,232 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 19,708
barrels of oil, 11,251 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 42,179 mcf of
gas were sold, or 37,989 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 20,322
barrels of oil, 12,263 barrels of NGLs and 46,681 mcf of gas were sold, or
40,365 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.25, or 72%, from
$16.96 in 1999 to $29.21 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.99, or 63%, from $9.57 in 1999 to $15.56 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 69% from $1.72 in 1999 to $2.90 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $448,166 as compared to $425,787
in 1999, an increase of $22,379, or 5%. The increase was due to increases in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, production costs and general and
administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $326,082 in 2000 and $305,897 in 1999, resulting in a
$20,185 increase, or 7%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by a decline in well
maintenance costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
38% from $20,352 in 1999 to $28,155 in 2000, primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $25,658 in 2000 and $16,168 in
1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partners. The method
of allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $27,748 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $66,181 in 2000 as compared to $99,538 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $33,357, or 34%. This decrease was primarily due to an 8,572 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 15% to $542,232 from
$471,148 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 20,322 barrels of oil,
12,263 barrels of NGLs and 46,681 mcf of gas were sold, or 40,365 BOEs. In 1998,
22,378 barrels of oil, 13,103 barrels of NGLs and 52,345 mcf of gas were sold,
or 44,205 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.70, or 28%, from
$13.26 in 1998 to $16.96 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.63, or 38%, from $6.94 in 1998 to $9.57 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.60 in 1998 to $1.72 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $425,787 as compared to $842,701
in 1998, a decrease of $416,914, or 49%. The decrease was due to declines in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset by
an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $305,897 in 1999 and $322,354 in 1998, resulting in a
$16,457 decrease, or 5%. The decrease was due to declines in ad valorem taxes
and well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A increased 27% from $16,076 in 1998 to $20,352 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $16,168 in
1999 and $14,082 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $262,396 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $99,538 in 1999 compared to $241,875 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $142,337, or 59%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 173,770 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $259,724 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $334,289, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $20,185, G&A expenses paid of $7,803 and working capital of $46,577. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $381,025 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $46,736 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by a decline in well
maintenance costs. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of
the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited
to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on several oil and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $474,240, of which $4,742 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $469,498 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $154,304, of which
$1,543 was distributed to the managing general partner and $152,761 to the
limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B CONV., L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 432,217 $ 409,534 $ 873,058 $ 542,232 $ 471,148 $ 718,293 $ 849,156
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 27,748 $ -- $ 262,396 $ 330,848 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 211,326 $ 204,552 $ 433,269 $ 121,713 $ (366,035) $ (122,936) $ 342,846
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 2,113 $ 2,046 $ 4,333 $ 1,217 $ (3,660) $ (1,229) $ 3,428
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 209,213 $ 202,506 $ 428,936 $ 120,496 $ (362,375) $ (121,707) $ 339,418
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 33.17 $ 32.11 $ 68.01 $ 19.11 $ (57.46) $ (19.30) $ 53.82
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 26.50 $ 33.22 $ 74.44 $ 24.22 $ 27.70 $ 62.96 $ 61.29
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,148,110 $1,148,269 $1,101,313 $1,145,764 $1,175,521 $1,725,007 $2,246,482
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
--------------------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
--------------------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
89-B, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 89-B, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 6,949
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 6,473
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,924
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 279.80
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.19 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 177.79
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 171.15
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 258.93
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 271.62
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial $ 158
Investment (c), (f)
-----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2039, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 241,922 $ 105,641
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 100,082 148,020
----------- -----------
Total current assets 342,004 253,661
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,858,627 5,855,803
Accumulated depletion (4,934,712) (4,894,889)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 923,915 960,914
----------- -----------
$ 1,265,919 $ 1,214,575
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 17,756 $ 12,985
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 12,722 12,256
Limited partners (6,949 interests) 1,235,441 1,189,334
----------- -----------
1,248,163 1,201,590
----------- -----------
$ 1,265,919 $ 1,214,575
=========== ===========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
--------------------- ---------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
-------- -------- -------- --------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $209,198 $232,094 $475,940 $450,799
Interest 1,766 2,342 3,723 4,042
-------- -------- -------- --------
210,964 234,436 479,663 454,841
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 97,874 90,344 191,734 180,904
General and administrative 6,278 7,307 15,495 13,868
Depletion 19,323 18,232 39,823 35,077
-------- -------- -------- --------
123,475 115,883 247,052 229,849
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 87,489 $118,553 $232,611 $224,992
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 875 $ 1,186 $ 2,326 $ 2,250
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 86,614 $117,367 $230,285 $222,742
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 12.46 $ 16.89 $ 33.14 $ 32.05
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 12,256 $ 1,189,334 $ 1,201,590
Distributions (1,860) (184,178) (186,038)
Net income 2,326 230,285 232,611
----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 12,722 $ 1,235,441 $ 1,248,163
=========== =========== ===========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 232,611 $ 224,992
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 39,823 35,077
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 47,938 (30,214)
Accounts payable 4,771 10,563
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 325,143 240,418
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (2,824) (8,268)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (186,038) (233,181)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 136,281 (1,031)
Cash at beginning of period 105,641 130,083
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 241,922 $ 129,052
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1989 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 6% to $475,940 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $450,799 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 10,095 barrels
6
of oil, 4,141 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 25,638 mcf of gas were
sold, or 18,509 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 11,198 barrels of oil, 6,538 barrels of NGLs and 24,114 mcf of
gas were sold, or 21,755 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.25, or 1%, from $27.44
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.69 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.09, or 22%, from
$13.93 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.02 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 125% from $2.18
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.91 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than those received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $247,052 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $229,849 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$17,203, or 7%. This increase was due to an increase in production costs,
depletion and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $191,734 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$180,904 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $10,830, or 6%, increase.
This increase was the result of additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production and higher production taxes due to higher
oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
12%, from $13,868 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $15,495 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $39,823 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$35,077 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $4,746, or 14%. This
increase was due to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil
production of 1,103 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared
to the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 10% to $209,198 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $232,094 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and lower
average prices received for oil, offset by increases in the average prices
7
received for gas and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 4,922
barrels of oil, 2,174 barrels of NGLs and 11,900 mcf of gas were sold, or 9,079
BOEs. For the three months ended June 30, 2000, 5,654 barrels of oil, 3,426
barrels of NGLs and 11,762 mcf of gas were sold, or 11,040 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.78, or 3%, from $27.73
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.95 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.76, or
13%, from $13.12 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.88 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 44% to
$3.72 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.58 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $123,475 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $115,883 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$7,592, or 7%. This increase was due to increases in production costs and
depletion, offset by a decrease in G&A.
Production costs were $97,874 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$90,344 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $7,530 increase, or 8%. The
increase was due to an increase in well maintenance and workover costs incurred
to stimulate well production, offset by a decrease in production taxes due to
lower oil prices.
During this period, G&A decreased 14%, from $7,307 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $6,278 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues and a
decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $19,323 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$18,232 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,091, or 6%. This increase
was attributable to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices, offset by a decrease in oil
production of 732 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared
to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $84,725 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period in 2000. This increase was due
to an increase of $24,822 in oil and gas sales receipts and a reduction in
working capital of $72,360, offset by increases in production costs of $10,830
and G&A expenses of $1,627. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from
the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an additional
$88,680 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $63,858 resulting from the decline in
production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in
production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover
8
costs incurred to stimulate well production and increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due
to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated
(limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas
revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on
various oil and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$186,038, of which $1,860 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$184,178 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $233,181, of which $2,332 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $230,849 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
9
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 105,641 $ 130,083
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 148,020 80,988
----------- -----------
Total current assets 253,661 211,071
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on
the successful efforts accounting method 5,855,803 5,844,308
Accumulated depletion (4,894,889) (4,791,400)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 960,914 1,052,908
----------- -----------
$ 1,214,575 $ 1,263,979
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 12,985 $ 16,819
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 12,256 12,712
Limited partners (6,949 interests) 1,189,334 1,234,448
----------- -----------
1,201,590 1,247,160
----------- -----------
$ 1,214,575 $ 1,263,979
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 961,197 $ 597,130 $ 518,801
Interest 9,481 5,469 6,043
Gain on disposition of assets -- 390 119
--------- --------- ---------
970,678 602,989 524,963
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 359,243 337,025 355,148
General and administrative 31,002 22,369 17,625
Impairment of oil and gas properties 30,586 -- 289,124
Depletion 72,903 109,755 266,451
--------- --------- ---------
493,734 469,149 928,348
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 476,944 $ 133,840 $(403,385)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 4,769 $ 1,338 $ (4,034)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 472,175 $ 132,502 $(399,351)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 67.95 $ 19.07 $ (57.47)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 19,053 $ 1,862,101 $ 1,881,154
Distributions (1,945) (192,484) (194,429)
Net loss (4,034) (399,351) (403,385)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 13,074 1,270,266 1,283,340
Distributions (1,700) (168,320) (170,020)
Net income 1,338 132,502 133,840
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 12,712 1,234,448 1,247,160
Distributions (5,225) (517,289) (522,514)
Net income 4,769 472,175 476,944
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 12,256 $ 1,189,334 $ 1,201,590
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 476,944 $ 133,840 $(403,385)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 30,586 -- 289,124
Depletion 72,903 109,755 266,451
Gain on disposition of assets -- (390) (119)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (67,032) (22,818) 47,684
Accounts payable (3,834) 2,839 (7,697)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 509,567 223,226 192,058
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (11,495) (8,325) (11,900)
Proceeds from dispositions of assets -- 390 119
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (11,495) (7,935) (11,781)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (522,514) (170,020) (194,429)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (24,442) 45,271 (14,152)
Cash at beginning of year 130,083 84,812 98,964
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 105,641 $ 130,083 $ 84,812
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 89-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1989 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $30,586 and $289,124
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000 and 1998, respectively.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $211,364 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 476,944 $ 133,840 $(403,385)
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 30,586 -- 289,124
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts deducted
for financial reporting purposes 63,879 100,769 254,734
Other, net (1,322) (3,050) 3,282
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 570,087 $ 231,559 $ 143,755
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the net costs incurred, whether
capitalized or expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing
activities for the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- -------
Development costs $ 11,495 $ 8,325 $11,900
========= ========= =======
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 188,868 $ 188,868
Completed wells and equipment 5,666,935 5,655,440
----------- -----------
5,855,803 5,844,308
Accumulated depletion (4,894,889) (4,791,400)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 960,914 $ 1,052,908
=========== ===========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $147,103 $142,197 $136,965
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 28,269 $ 17,812 $ 15,438
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 89-B Conv., L.P. ("EMPL") Parker & Parsley 89-B Conv., L.P. and
the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement. EMPL
is a limited partnership organized for the benefit of certain employees of
Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
--------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 72 limited partner interests
owned by Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 89-B
Conv., L.P. is 52.421545% and 47.578455%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 519,501 809,915
Revisions (222,853) (272,177)
Production (39,063) (57,643)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 257,585 480,095
Revisions 295,189 456,122
Production (35,879) (51,400)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 516,895 884,817
Revisions 1,443 (174,232)
Production (34,089) (46,454)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 484,249 664,131
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.35 per barrel of NGLs and $7.90 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $3,756,000 and undiscounted was $7,461,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
11
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 15,796 $ 12,909 $ 2,874
Future production costs (8,335) (7,619) (2,162)
-------- -------- --------
7,461 5,290 712
10% annual discount factor (3,705) (2,457) (247)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 3,756 $ 2,833 $ 465
======== ======== ========
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (602) $ (260) $ (163)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,674 1,262 (1,263)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (185) 1,931 (311)
Accretion of discount 283 47 208
Changes in production rates, timing and other (247) (612) (84)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 923 2,368 (1,613)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 2,833 465 2,078
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 3,756 $ 2,833 $ 465
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Plains Marketing, L.P. 55% 51% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 59%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 6% 26%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $41,588 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all
12
Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general partner and
operator of the Partnership's properties, all production expenses are
incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The majority of
the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly by the
Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the
Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the
Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$6,949,000. The managing general partner is required to contribute
amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership capital less commission
and offering expenses allocated to the limited partners and to
contribute amounts necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to
it under the Partnership agreement to the extent its share of
revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 61% to $961,197 for 2000 as
compared to $597,130 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 21,703
barrels of oil, 12,386 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 46,454 mcf of
gas were sold, or 41,831 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 22,376
barrels of oil, 13,503 barrels of NGLs and 51,400 mcf of gas were sold, or
44,446 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.25, or 72%, from
$16.96 in 1999 to $29.21 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.99, or 63%, from $9.57 in 1999 to $15.56 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 69% from $1.72 in 1999 to $2.90 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $493,734 as compared to $469,149
in 1999, an increase of $24,585, or 5%. The increase was due to increases in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, production costs and general and
administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $359,243 in 2000 and $337,025 in 1999, resulting in a
$22,218 increase, or 7%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by a decline in well
maintenance costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
39% from $22,369 in 1999 to $31,002 in 2000, primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $28,269 in 2000 and $17,812 in
1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $30,586 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $72,903 in 2000 as compared to $109,755 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $36,852, or 34%. This decrease was primarily due to an 8,955 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 15% to $597,130 from
$518,801 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 22,376 barrels of oil,
13,503 barrels of NGLs and 51,400 mcf of gas were sold, or 44,446 BOEs. In 1998,
24,633 barrels of oil, 14,430 barrels of NGLs and 57,643 mcf of gas were sold,
or 48,670 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.70, or 28%, from
$13.26 in 1998 to $16.96 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.63, or 38%, from $6.94 in 1998 to $9.57 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.60 in 1998 to $1.72 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $469,149 as compared to $928,348
in 1998, a decrease of $459,199, or 49%. The decrease was due to declines in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset by
an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $337,025 in 1999 and $355,148 in 1998, resulting in an
$18,123 decrease, or 5%. The decrease was due to reductions in ad valorem taxes
and well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A increased 27% from $17,625 in 1998 to $22,369 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $17,812 in
1999 and $15,438 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $289,124 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $109,755 in 1999 compared to $266,451 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $156,696, or 59%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 191,467 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $286,341 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $368,079, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $22,218, G&A expenses paid of $8,633 and working capital of $50,887. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $419,447 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $51,368 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by a decline in well
maintenance costs. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of
the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited
to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on several oil and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $522,514, of which $5,225 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $517,289 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $170,020, of which
$1,700 was distributed to the managing general partner and $168,320 to the
limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 89-B, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 475,940 $ 450,799 $ 961,197 $ 597,130 $ 518,801 $ 791,004 $ 935,268
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 30,586 $ -- $ 289,124 $ 364,625 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 232,611 $ 224,992 $ 476,944 $ 133,840 $ (403,385) $ (135,918) $ 377,397
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 2,326 $ 2,250 $ 4,769 $ 1,338 $ (4,034) $ (1,359) $ 3,774
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 230,285 $ 222,742 $ 472,175 $ 132,502 $ (399,351) $ (134,559) $ 373,623
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 33.14 $ 32.05 $ 67.95 $ 19.07 $ (57.47) $ (19.36) $ 53.77
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 26.50 $ 33.22 $ 74.44 $ 24.22 $ 27.70 $ 62.96 $ 61.30
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,265,919 $1,266,353 $1,214,575 $1,263,979 $1,297,320 $1,902,831 $2,477,410
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
Private Investment 89, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus
dated October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 7,060
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 5,651
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 1,998
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 284.67
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for 4.14 times
the past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 161.58
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 150.75
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 264.89
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c). (e) $ 276.24
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 165
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2039, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 193,621 $ 101,600
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 131,396 118,399
---------- ----------
Total current assets 325,017 219,999
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,237,687 5,223,723
Accumulated depletion (4,386,574) (4,351,220)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 851,113 872,503
---------- ----------
$ 1,176,130 $ 1,092,502
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 21,803 $ 15,443
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 13,539 12,767
Limited partners (176.5 interests) 1,140,788 1,064,292
---------- ----------
1,154,327 1,077,059
---------- ----------
$ 1,176,130 $ 1,092,502
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 202,783 $ 199,796 $ 452,230 $ 388,517
Interest 1,532 2,009 3,061 3,476
-------- -------- -------- --------
204,315 201,805 455,291 391,993
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 88,516 79,969 233,371 158,403
General and administrative 6,328 5,993 15,038 11,655
Depletion 14,013 14,214 35,354 28,961
-------- -------- -------- --------
108,857 100,176 283,763 199,019
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 95,458 $ 101,629 $ 171,528 $ 192,974
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 954 $ 1,017 $ 1,715 $ 1,930
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 94,504 $ 100,612 $ 169,813 $ 191,044
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 535.43 $ 570.04 $ 962.11 $1,082.40
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 12,767 $1,064,292 $1,077,059
Distributions (943) (93,317) (94,260)
Net income 1,715 169,813 171,528
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 13,539 $1,140,788 $1,154,327
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 171,528 $ 192,974
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 35,354 28,961
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (12,997) (19,770)
Accounts payable 6,360 5,186
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 200,245 207,351
-------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (14,685) (3,016)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 721 158
-------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities (13,964) (2,858)
-------- --------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (94,260) (201,904)
-------- --------
Net increase in cash 92,021 2,589
Cash at beginning of period 101,600 105,420
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 193,621 $ 108,009
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized
in 1989 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1990.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended
June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 16% to $452,230 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $388,517 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received and an
6
increase in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 11,227 barrels
of oil, 3,467 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 21,188 mcf of gas were
sold, or 18,225 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 11,599 barrels of oil, 3,620 barrels of NGLs and 13,324 mcf of
gas were sold, or 17,440 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased slightly from $27.07 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.14 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.53, or 11%, from $13.37
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.90 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 131% from $1.96 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.53 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $283,763 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $199,019 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$84,744, or 43%. This increase was due to increases in production costs, general
and administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $233,371 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$158,403 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $74,968 increase, or 47%.
The increase was attributable to additional workover and well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production and higher production taxes due to higher
oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
29%, from $11,655 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $15,038 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues in addition to increases in audit and
tax fees.
Depletion was $35,354 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$28,961 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $6,393, or 22%. This
increase was due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decrease in oil production
of 372 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 1% to $202,783 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $199,796 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
7
and an increase in production, offset by lower average prices received for oil
and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 5,318 barrels of oil, 1,848
barrels of NGLs and 10,180 mcf of gas were sold, or 8,863 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 5,732 barrels of oil, 1,766 barrels of NGLs and
6,851 mcf of gas were sold, or 8,640 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.60, or 2%, from $27.37
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.77 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $1.95, or
13%, from $15.25 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $13.30 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 51% to
$3.52 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.33 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $108,857 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $100,176 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$8,681, or 9%. This increase was due to increases in production costs and G&A,
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $88,516 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$79,969 for the same period in 2000, resulting in an $8,547 increase, or 11%.
The increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A increased 6%, from $5,993 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $6,328 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a higher
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $14,013 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$14,214 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $201, or 1%. This decrease
was attributable to a decrease in oil production of 414 barrels for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $7,106 during the six months
ended June 30, 2001 from the same period in 2000. This decrease was due to
increases in production costs of $74,968 and G&A expenses of $3,383, offset by
an increase in oil and gas receipts of $63,298 and a reduction in working
capital of $7,947. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the
increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an additional $40,500
to oil and gas receipts and $22,798 resulting from an increase in production
during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in production
costs was primarily due to additional workover and well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production and increased production taxes associated
8
with higher oil and gas prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due to a
higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited
to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues in
addition to increases in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities included expenditures related to
equipment upgrades on various oil and gas properties for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $721 and $158 for the six months ended June
30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, were due to equipment credits received on
active wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$94,260, of which $943 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$93,317 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $201,904, of which $2,019 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $199,885 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
9
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations,
partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 89, L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 101,600 $ 105,420
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 118,399 76,918
----------- -----------
Total current assets 219,999 182,338
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,223,723 5,213,140
Accumulated depletion (4,351,220) (4,291,008)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 872,503 922,132
----------- -----------
$ 1,092,502 $ 1,104,470
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 15,443 $ 15,871
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 12,767 12,882
Limited partners (176.5 interests) 1,064,292 1,075,717
----------- -----------
1,077,059 1,088,599
----------- -----------
$ 1,092,502 $ 1,104,470
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 856,030 $ 487,809 $ 478,637
Interest 8,294 4,555 5,752
--------- --------- ---------
864,324 492,364 484,389
--------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 321,340 311,071 300,564
General and administrative 28,583 19,470 16,898
Impairment of oil and gas properties - 44,421 18,873
Depletion 60,212 76,798 258,483
--------- --------- ---------
410,135 451,760 594,818
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 454,189 $ 40,604 $(110,429)
========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 4,542 $ 406 $ (1,104)
========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 449,647 $ 40,198 $(109,325)
========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $2,547.58 $ 227.75 $ (619.41)
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 16,634 $ 1,447,067 $ 1,463,701
Distributions (2,019) (199,798) (201,817)
Net loss (1,104) (109,325) (110,429)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 13,511 1,137,944 1,151,455
Distributions (1,035) (102,425) (103,460)
Net income 406 40,198 40,604
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 12,882 1,075,717 1,088,599
Distributions (4,657) (461,072) (465,729)
Net income 4,542 449,647 454,189
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 12,767 $ 1,064,292 $ 1,077,059
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 454,189 $ 40,604 (110,429)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - 44,421 18,873
Depletion 60,212 76,798 258,483
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (41,481) (30,189) 17,499
Accounts payable (428) 3,058 (9,920)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 472,492 134,692 174,506
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (10,741) (10,151) (14,992)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 158 - 6,106
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (10,583) (10,151) (8,886)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (465,729) (103,460) (201,817)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (3,820) 21,081 (36,197)
Cash at beginning of year 105,420 84,339 120,536
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 101,600 $ 105,420 $ 84,339
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 89, L.P. (the "Partnership") was
organized in 1989 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas
and was converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1990. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the unit-of-
production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil (dominant
mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants. The
carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non- partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $44,421 and $18,873
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $49,559 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 454,189 $ 40,604 $(110,429)
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - 44,421 18,873
Depletion and depreciation for tax reporting purposes
less than amounts for financial reporting purposes 49,670 66,310 239,923
Other, net (1,023) (3,073) 9,369
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 502,836 $ 148,262 $ 157,736
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
Development costs $ 10,741 $ 10,151 $ 14,992
========== ========== ==========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 58,953 $ 58,953
Completed wells and equipment 5,164,770 5,154,187
----------- -----------
5,223,723 5,213,140
Accumulated depletion (4,351,220) (4,291,008)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 872,503 $ 922,132
=========== ===========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 126,729 $ 122,574 $ 123,196
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 25,581 $ 14,534 $ 14,259
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 89 Private Conv., L.P. ("EMPL") and the Partnership are parties to
the Program agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership organized for the benefit
of certain employees of Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on
December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
--------------- -----------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated at
the Partnership level.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 480,284 559,912
Revisions (179,534) (180,570)
Production (36,741) (44,624)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 264,009 334,718
Revisions 227,645 277,954
Production (30,310) (32,985)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 461,344 579,687
Revisions 37,767 (55,380)
Production (30,738) (30,037)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 468,373 494,270
======== ========
10
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.18 per barrel of NGLs and $7.93 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $3,336,000 and undiscounted was $6,999,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 14,511 $ 11,459 $ 2,862
Future production costs (7,512) (6,395) (2,112)
--------- --------- ---------
6,999 5,064 750
10% annual discount factor (3,663) (2,516) (271)
--------- --------- ---------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 3,336 $ 2,548 $ 479
========= ========= =========
11
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (535) $ (177) $ (178)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,060 1,324 (1,107)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 183 1,588 (261)
Accretion of discount 255 48 189
Changes in production rates, timing and other (175) (714) (48)
-------- -------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 788 2,069 (1,405)
-------- -------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 2,548 479 1,884
-------- -------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 3,336 $ 2,548 $ 479
======== ======== ========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 65% 64% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 57%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 1% 3% 15%
GPM Gas Corporation 3% 3% 5%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $48,161 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. In return, it is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
12
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $7,060,000. Pioneer
USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership
capital less commission and organization and offering costs allocated to
the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs
and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the
extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 75% to $856,030 for 2000 as
compared to $487,809 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a slight decline in production. In 2000,
22,438 barrels of oil, 8,300 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 30,037
mcf of gas were sold, or 35,744 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999,
20,601 barrels of oil, 9,709 barrels of NGLs and 32,985 mcf of gas were sold, or
35,808 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $11.94, or 70%, from
$17.06 in 1999 to $29.00 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.17, or 71%, from $8.69 in 1999 to $14.86 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 74% from $1.57 in 1999 to $2.73 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 2000 to $410,135 as compared to $451,760
in 1999, a decrease of $41,625, or 9%. The decrease was due to a decline in
depletion and the impairment of oil and gas properties, offset by an increase in
production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $321,340 in 2000 and $311,071 in 1999, resulting in a
$10,269 increase, or 3%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by lower well
maintenance costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
47% from $19,470 in 1999 to $28,583 in 2000, primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $25,581 in 2000 and $14,534 in
1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long- Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets
to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $44,421 related to its oil and gas properties during 1999.
Depletion was $60,212 in 2000 as compared to $76,798 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $16,586, or 22%. This decrease was primarily due to a 23,945 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges
taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 2% to $487,809 from
$478,637 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 20,601 barrels of oil,
9,709 barrels of NGLs and 32,985 mcf of gas were sold, or 35,808 BOEs. In 1998,
25,672 barrels of oil, 11,069 barrels of NGLs and 44,624 mcf of gas were sold,
or 44,178 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.78, or 28%, from
$13.28 in 1998 to $17.06 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.12, or 32%, from $6.57 in 1998 to $8.69 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.46 in 1998 to $1.57 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $451,760 as compared to $594,818
in 1998, a decrease of $143,058, or 24%. The decrease was due to a decline in
depletion, offset by an increase in the impairment of oil and gas properties,
production costs and G&A.
Production costs were $311,071 in 1999 and $300,564 in 1998, resulting in a
$10,507 increase, or 3%. The increase was due to an increase in well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production, offset by declines in ad valorem
and production taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 15% from $16,898 in 1998 to $19,470 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $14,534 in
1999 and $14,259 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized non-cash SFAS 121 charges of $44,421 and $18,873
related to its oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Depletion was $76,798 in 1999 compared to $258,483 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $181,685, or 70%. This decrease was the result of a combination of
factors that included an increase in proved reserves of 160,524 barrels of oil
during 1999 as a result of higher commodity prices, a decline in oil production
of 5,071 barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared to the same
period in 1998 and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $337,800 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $371,960, offset by increases in production costs paid
of
$10,269, G&A expenses paid of $9,113 and working capital of $14,778. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $347,665 to oil and gas receipts and
an increase of $24,295 resulting from the increase in oil production during
2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices, offset by lower well
maintenance costs. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of
the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $158 in 2000 were from equipment credits
received on one active well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $465,729, of which $4,657 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $461,072 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $103,460, of which
$1,035 was distributed to the managing general partner and $102,425 to the
limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 89, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 452,230 $ 388,517 $ 856,030 $ 487,809 $ 478,637 $ 675,051 $ 800,390
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 44,421 $ 18,873 $ 377,878 $ 79,530
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Gain on litigation
settlement, net $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 171,528 $ 192,974 $ 454,189 $ 40,604 $ (110,429) $ (183,640) $ 249,498
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 1,715 $ 1,930 $ 4,542 $ 406 $ (1,104) $ (1,836) $ 2,495
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 169,813 $ 191,044 $ 449,647 $ 40,198 $ (109,325) $ (181,804) $ 247,003
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 962.11 $ 1,082.40 $ 2,547.58 $ 227.75 $ (619.41) $(1,030.05) $ 1,399.45
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 528.71 $ 1,132.49 $ 2,612.31 $ 580.31 $ 1,132.00 $ 2,068.82 $ 1,932.01
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,176,130 $1,100,726 $1,092,502 $1,104,470 $1,164,268 $1,486,434 $2,033,774
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
90-A Conv., L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated
October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 2,359
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 2,146
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 584
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 248.84
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.29 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 194.62
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 183.97
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 230.61
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 241.59
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 125
(c), (f)
-----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2040, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 80,551 $ 30,771
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 32,965 42,233
---------- ----------
Total current assets 113,516 73,004
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 1,761,394 1,761,261
Accumulated depletion (1,403,593) (1,390,348)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 357,801 370,913
---------- ----------
$ 471,317 $ 443,917
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 7,547 $ 5,524
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 4,666 4,412
Limited partners (2,359 interests) 459,104 433,981
---------- ----------
463,770 438,393
---------- ----------
$ 471,317 $ 443,917
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 65,354 $ 61,992 $ 147,209 $ 125,481
Interest 592 740 1,155 1,274
Gain on disposition of assets - 3,262 - 3,262
-------- -------- -------- --------
65,946 65,994 148,364 130,017
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 30,568 30,880 57,199 55,415
General and administrative 1,962 1,979 4,916 3,892
Depletion 6,402 5,291 13,245 12,429
-------- -------- -------- --------
38,932 38,150 75,360 71,736
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 27,014 $ 27,844 $ 73,004 $ 58,281
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 270 $ 279 $ 730 $ 583
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 26,744 $ 27,565 $ 72,274 $ 57,698
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 11.34 $ 11.69 $ 30.64 $ 24.46
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 4,412 $ 433,981 $ 438,393
Distributions (476) (47,151) (47,627)
Net income 730 72,274 73,004
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 4,666 $ 459,104 $ 463,770
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 73,004 $ 58,281
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 13,245 12,429
Gain on disposition of assets - (3,262)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 9,268 (6,705)
Accounts payable 2,023 1,579
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 97,540 62,322
-------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (133) (1,451)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 3,262
-------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (133) 1,811
-------- --------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (47,627) (64,863)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 49,780 (730)
Cash at beginning of period 30,771 41,094
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 80,551 $ 40,364
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in 1990 as a
general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was converted to a
Delaware limited partnership in 1991.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 17% to $147,209 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $125,481 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
6
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 3,049 barrels
of oil, 1,282 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 8,155 mcf of gas were
sold, or 5,690 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June
30, 2000, 3,105 barrels of oil, 1,853 barrels of NGLs and 6,902 mcf of gas were
sold, or 6,108 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.43, or 2%, from $27.46
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.89 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.31, or 24%, from
$13.56 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.87 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 126% from $2.20
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.98 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $3,262 was recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 resulting from equipment credits received on one fully
depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $75,360 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $71,736 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $3,624,
or 5%. This increase was due to increases in production costs, general and
administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $57,199 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and $55,415
for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $1,784 increase, or 3%. The increase
was due to higher production taxes due to higher oil and gas prices and
additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production, offset
by a decrease in workover costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
26% from $3,892 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4,916 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $13,245 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$12,429 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $816, or 7%. This increase
was primarily due to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 5% to $65,354 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $61,992 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by lower average prices received for oil and a decrease in
production. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 1,414 barrels of oil, 749
barrels of NGLs and 4,057 mcf of gas were sold, or 2,839 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 1,455 barrels of oil, 976 barrels of NGLs and 3,472
mcf of gas were sold, or 3,010 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.22, or 1%, from $27.54
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.32 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.69, or 13%, from
$13.36 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.05 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 49% to $3.82 during
the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.57 during the same period in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $3,262 was recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2000 resulting from equipment credits received on one fully
depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $38,932 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $38,150 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$782, or 2%. This increase was due to an increase in depletion, offset by
declines in production costs and G&A.
Production costs were $30,568 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$30,880 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $312 decrease, or 1%. The
decrease was due to lower workover costs, offset by additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 1%, from $1,979 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $1,962 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a decrease
in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $6,402 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$5,291 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,111, or 21%. This increase
was attributable to a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $35,218 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $21,609 and a
reduction of $16,417 in working capital, offset by increases in production costs
8
of $1,784 and G&A expenses of $1,024. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $26,555 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $4,946 resulting from the
decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production, offset by a decrease in workover costs. The increase
in G&A was primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on various oil and
gas properties.
Proceeds of $3,262 recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2000 were
from equipment credits on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$47,627, of which $476 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$47,151 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $64,863, of which $649 was distributed to the
managing general partner and $64,214 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
9
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv.,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
-------- ---------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 30,771 $ 41,094
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 42,233 24,997
-------- --------
Total current assets 73,004 66,091
-------- --------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 1,761,261 1,758,206
Accumulated depletion (1,390,348) (1,363,812)
---------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 370,913 394,394
-------- --------
$ 443,917 $ 460,485
========= =========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 5,524 $ 5,332
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 4,412 4,579
Limited partners (2,359 interests) 433,981 450,574
-------- ---------
438,393 455,153
-------- --------
$ 443,917 $ 460,485
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- ------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 279,230 $ 169,279 $152,905
Interest 3,027 1,751 2,080
Gain on disposition of assets 3,262 - -
------- ------- ------
285,519 171,030 154,985
------- ------- -------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 114,159 93,178 97,819
General and administrative 9,468 7,068 4,961
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 11,795
Depletion 26,536 36,271 55,908
------- ------- ------
150,163 136,517 170,483
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) $ 135,356 $ 34,513 $(15,498)
======== ======== =======
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 1,354 $ 345 $ (155)
======== ======== =======
Limited partners $ 134,002 $ 34,168 $(15,343)
======== ======== =======
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 56.80 $ 14.48 $ (6.50)
======== ======== =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
------------- -------------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 5,602 $ 551,772 $ 557,374
Distributions (678) (67,095) (67,773)
Net loss (155) (15,343) (15,498)
------ -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 4,769 469,334 474,103
Distributions (535) (52,928) (53,463)
Net income 345 34,168 34,513
------ -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 4,579 450,574 455,153
Distributions (1,521) (150,595) (152,116)
Net income 1,354 134,002 135,356
------ -------- -------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 4,412 $ 433,981 $ 438,393
======= ========= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 135,356 $ 34,513 $ (15,498)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 11,795
Depletion 26,536 36,271 55,908
Gain on disposition of assets (3,262) - -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (17,236) (7,632) 12,991
Accounts payable 192 841 (2,835)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities 141,586 63,993 62,361
-------- ------- -------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (3,055) (2,507) (3,134)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 3,262 2,501 -
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 207 (6) (3,134)
------- ------- -------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (152,116) (53,463) (67,773)
-------- ------- -------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (10,323) 10,524 (8,546)
Cash at beginning of year 41,094 30,570 39,116
------- ------- -------
Cash at end of year $ 30,771 $ 41,094 $ 30,570
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in
1990 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1991. The Partnership's managing
general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $11,795 related to its
proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $109,150 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $135,356 $34,513 $(15,498)
Depletion and depreciation for tax reporting purposes
less than amounts for financial reporting purposes 23,651 33,412 51,723
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes -- -- 11,795
Other, net (403) 1,343 1,229
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $158,604 $69,268 $49,249
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Development costs $ 3,055 $ 2,507 $ 3,134
========= ========= =========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
--------- ---------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 69,332 $ 69,332
Completed well and equipment 1,691,929 1,688,874
--------- ---------
1,761,261 1,758,206
Accumulated depletion (1,390,348) (1,363,812)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 370,913 $ 394,394
========= =========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 42,503 $ 41,777 $ 41,366
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 8,329 $ 5,027 $ 4,007
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 90-A Conv., L.P. ("EMPL"), Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. and the
Partnership are parties to the Program agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership
organized for the benefit of certain employees of Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged
with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
--------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 14 limited partner interests
owned by Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 90-A,
L.P. is 25.725191% and 74.274809%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 137,987 205,757
Revisions (49,089) (52,907)
Production (11,399) (16,309)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 77,499 136,541
Revisions 71,585 121,688
Production (10,130) (14,989)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 138,954 243,240
Revisions 6,057 (59,715)
Production (9,876) (13,365)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 135,135 170,160
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.25 per barrel of NGLs and $7.89 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $1,053,000 and undiscounted was $2,025,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 4,309 $ 3,455 $ 854
Future production costs (2,284) (2,046) (669)
-------- -------- --------
2,025 1,409 185
10% annual discount factor (972) (653) (54)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 1,053 $ 756 $ 131
========= ========= =========
11
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (165) $ (76) $ (55)
Net changes in prices and production costs 446 419 (356)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (26) 511 (61)
Accretion of discount 76 13 56
Changes in production rates, timing and other (34) (242) (14)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 297 625 (430)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 756 131 561
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 1,053 $ 756 $ 131
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil and
gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10% of
total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 54% 51% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 12% 11% -
NGTS LLC 10% 10% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 57%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 2% 5% 22%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.,
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and NGTS LLC were $13,068, $2,535 and $1,423, respectively,
which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in
the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general
partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all production
expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Under the Partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
12
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $2,359,000. Pioneer USA
is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership
capital less commission, organization and offering costs allocated to the
limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs and
expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the extent its
share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 65% to $279,230 for 2000 as
compared to $169,279 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 6,255
barrels of oil, 3,621 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 13,365 mcf of
gas were sold, or 12,104 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 6,133
barrels of oil, 3,997 barrels of NGLs and 14,989 mcf of gas were sold, or 12,628
BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.26, or 72%, from
$17.06 in 1999 to $29.32 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.04, or 63%, from $9.58 in 1999 to $15.62 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 67% from $1.76 in 1999 to $2.94 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $3,262 was recognized during 2000 resulting
from equipment credits received on one well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $150,163 as compared to $136,517
in 1999, an increase of $13,646, or 10%. The increase was due to increases in
production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a
decline in depletion.
Production costs were $114,159 in 2000 and $93,178 in 1999, resulting in a
$20,981 increase, or 23%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
34% from $7,068 in 1999 to $9,468 in 2000, primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $8,329 in 2000 and $5,027 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $26,536 in 2000 as compared to $36,271 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $9,735, or 27%. This decrease was primarily due to a 10,806 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 11% to $169,279 from
$152,905 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 6,133 barrels of oil,
3,997 barrels
of NGLs and 14,989 mcf of gas were sold, or 12,628 BOEs. In 1998, 7,476 barrels
of oil, 3,923 barrels of NGLs and 16,309 mcf of gas were sold, or 14,117 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.86, or 29%, from
$13.20 in 1998 to $17.06 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.56, or 36%, from $7.02 in 1998 to $9.58 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 7% from $1.64 in 1998 to $1.76 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $136,517 as compared to $170,483
in 1998, a decrease of $33,966, or 20%. The decrease was due to reductions in
depletion, the impairment of oil and gas properties and production costs, offset
by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $93,178 in 1999 and $97,819 in 1998, resulting in a $4,641
decrease, or 5%. The decrease was due to declines in ad valorem taxes and well
maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A increased 42% from $4,961 in 1998 to $7,068 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $5,027 in
1999 and $4,007 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $11,795 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $36,271 in 1999 compared to $55,908 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $19,637, or 35%. This decrease was primarily the result of an
increase in proved reserves of 43,411 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of
higher commodity prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis
from charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998
and a decline in oil production of 1,343 barrels for the period ended December
31, 1999 compared to the same period in 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $77,593 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $111,227, offset by increases in production costs paid
of
$20,981, G&A expenses paid of $2,400 and working capital of $10,253. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $118,292 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $7,065 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $3,262 was recognized during 2000
resulting from equipment credits received on one well. Proceeds of $2,501 during
1999 were received from equipment credits on one active well and one temporarily
abandoned well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $152,116, of which $1,521 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $150,595 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $53,463, of which
$535 was distributed to the managing general partner and $52,928 to the limited
partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A CONV., L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
--------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $147,209 $ 125,481 $ 279,230 $ 169,279 $ 152,905 $ 223,014 $ 269,347
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 11,795 $ 111,163 $ --
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 73,004 $ 58,281 $ 135,356 $ 34,513 $ (15,498) $ (51,948) $ 90,354
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 730 $ 583 $ 1,354 $ 345 $ (155) $ (520) $ 903
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 72,274 $ 57,698 $ 134,002 $ 34,168 $ (15,343) $ (51,428) $ 89,451
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 30.64 $ 24.46 $ 56.80 $ 14.48 $ (6.50) $ (21.80) $ 37.92
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 19.99 $ 27.22 $ 63.84 $ 22.44 $ 28.44 $ 53.06 $ 53.75
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $471,317 $ 455,482 $ 443,917 $ 460,485 $ 478,594 $ 564,700 $ 742,427
======== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
90-A, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 90-A, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 6,811
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 6,196
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,662
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 249.45
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.25 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 195.17
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 184.56
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 231.22
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 242.20
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 125
(c), (f)
-----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2039, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-26097-05
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
-----------------------------
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2329245
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................. 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 236,952 $ 92,685
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 95,199 122,067
---------- ----------
Total current assets 332,151 214,752
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,085,569 5,085,185
Accumulated depletion (4,052,625) (4,014,368)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,032,944 1,070,817
---------- ----------
$ 1,365,095 $ 1,285,569
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 22,274 $ 15,770
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 13,509 12,779
Limited partners (6,811 interests) 1,329,312 1,257,020
---------- ----------
1,342,821 1,269,799
---------- ----------
$ 1,365,095 $ 1,285,569
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 188,539 $ 178,954 $ 424,897 $ 362,257
Interest 1,752 2,175 3,409 3,758
Gain on disposition of assets - 9,419 - 9,419
-------- -------- -------- --------
190,291 190,548 428,306 375,434
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 88,253 89,154 165,130 159,970
General and administrative 5,824 6,057 14,385 11,738
Depletion 18,523 15,331 38,257 35,963
-------- -------- -------- --------
112,600 110,542 217,772 207,671
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 77,691 $ 80,006 $ 210,534 $ 167,763
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 777 $ 800 $ 2,105 $ 1,678
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 76,914 $ 79,206 $ 208,429 $ 166,085
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 11.29 $ 11.62 $ 30.60 $ 24.38
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 12,779 $1,257,020 $1,269,799
Distributions (1,375) (136,137) (137,512)
Net income 2,105 208,429 210,534
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 13,509 $1,329,312 $1,342,821
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 210,534 $ 167,763
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 38,257 35,963
Gain on disposition of assets - (9,419)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 26,868 (19,346)
Accounts payable 6,504 5,068
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 282,163 180,029
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (384) (4,190)
Proceeds from asset dispositions - 9,419
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (384) 5,229
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (137,512) (187,276)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 144,267 (2,018)
Cash at beginning of period 92,685 122,649
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 236,952 $ 120,631
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 17% to $424,897 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $362,257 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 8,803 barrels
7
of oil, 3,690 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 23,539 mcf of gas were
sold, or 16,416 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 8,965 barrels of oil, 5,338 barrels of NGLs and 19,897 mcf of gas
were sold, or 17,619 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.43, or 2%, from $27.46
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.89 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.31, or 24%, from
$13.56 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.87 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 126% from $2.20
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.98 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $9,419 was recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 resulting from equipment credits received on one fully
depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $217,772 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $207,671 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$10,101, or 5%. This increase was due to increases in production costs, general
and administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $165,130 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$159,970 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $5,160 increase, or 3%. The
increase was due to higher production taxes associated with higher oil and gas
prices and additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well
production, offset by a decrease in workover costs.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
23%, from $11,738 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $14,385 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $38,257 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$35,963 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $2,294, or 6%. This increase
was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 5% to $188,539 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $178,954 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by lower average prices received for oil and a decrease in
production. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 4,081 barrels of oil,
8
2,147 barrels of NGLs and 11,701 mcf of gas were sold, or 8,178 BOEs. For the
three months ended June 30, 2000, 4,198 barrels of oil, 2,815 barrels of NGLs
and 10,000 mcf of gas were sold, or 8,680 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.22, or 1%, from $27.54
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.32 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.69, or 13%, from
$13.36 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.05 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 49% from $2.57
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.82 for the same period in
2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $9,419 was recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $112,600 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $110,542 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$2,058, or 2%. This increase was due to an increase in depletion, offset by
declines in production costs and G&A.
Production costs were $88,253 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$89,154 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $901 decrease, or 1%. The
decrease was due to lower workover costs, offset by additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 4%, from $6,057 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $5,824 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a decrease
in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $18,523 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$15,331 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $3,192, or 21%. This
increase was primarily due to a reduction in proved reserves during the period
ended June 30, 2001 as a result of lower commodity prices.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $102,134 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase of $62,291 in oil and gas sales receipts and a
reduction of $47,650 in working capital, offset by increases in production costs
of $5,160 and G&A expenses of $2,647. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $76,480 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $14,189 resulting from the
decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production, offset by a decrease in workover costs.
The increase in G&A was primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing
general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as
a result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax
fees.
9
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were for expenditures related to equipment upgrades on
active oil and gas properties.
Proceeds of $9,419 recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2000 were
from equipment credits on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$137,512, of which $1,375 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$136,137 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $187,276, of which $1,873 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $185,403 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
10
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 8, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-26097-05
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2329245
---------------------------------- ------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES /X/ NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. /X/
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$6,664,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 6,811.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 6,811 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers. Of the Partnership's total oil and
gas revenues for 2000, approximately 54%, 12% and 10% were attributable to sales
made to Plains Marketing, L.P., TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and NGTS LLC, respectively.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not have
an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs")
and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 27
oil and gas wells. Two wells have been sold. At December 31, 2000, 25 wells were
producing.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 6,811 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 525 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $434,802 and $152,818, respectively,
of such revenue-related distributions were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 806,344 $ 488,752 $ 441,480 $ 643,882 $ 777,677
========== =========== =========== ========== ===========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ - $ - $ 34,145 $ 321,019 $ -
========== =========== =========== ========== ===========
Net income (loss) $ 390,714 $ 99,965 $ (44,421) $ (149,948) $ 261,210
========== =========== =========== ========== ===========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 3,907 $ 1,000 $ (444) $ (1,499) $ 2,612
========== =========== =========== ========== ===========
Limited partners $ 386,807 $ 98,965 $ (43,977) $ (148,449) $ 258,598
========== =========== =========== ========== ===========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 56.79 $ 14.53 $ (6.46) $ (21.80) $ 37.97
========== =========== =========== ========== ===========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 63.84 $ 22.44 $ 28.44 $ 53.06 $ 53.75
========== =========== =========== ========== ===========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $1,285,569 $ 1,333,533 $ 1,385,777 $1,634,061 $ 2,146,498
========== =========== =========== ========== ===========
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 65% to $806,344 for 2000 as
compared to $488,752 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 18,065
barrels of oil, 10,454 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 38,570 mcf of
gas were sold, or 34,947 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 17,702
barrels of oil, 11,546 barrels of NGLs and 43,302 mcf of gas were sold, or
36,465 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.26, or 72% from
$17.06 in 1999 to $29.32 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.04, or 63% from $9.58 in 1999 to $15.62 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 67% in 2000 to $2.94 compared to $1.76 in
1999. The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past
decade and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $9,419 was recognized during 2000 resulting
from equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $433,960 as compared to $394,007
in 1999, an increase of $39,953, or 10%. This increase was primarily due to
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"),
offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $329,608 in 2000 and $269,017 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $60,591, or 23%. The increase was primarily due to additional well
maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production and higher
production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
36% from $20,244 in 1999 to $27,629 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $24,038 in 2000 and $14,514 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
Depletion was $76,723 in 2000 compared to $104,746 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $28,023, or 27%. This decrease was primarily due to a 33,982 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 11% to $488,752 from
$441,480 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 17,702 barrels of oil,
11,546 barrels of NGLs and 43,302 mcf of gas were sold, or 36,465 BOEs. In 1998,
21,587 barrels of oil, 11,328 barrels of NGLs and 47,086 mcf of gas were sold,
or 40,763 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.86, or 29% from $13.20
in 1998 to $17.06 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.56, or 36% from $7.02 in 1998 to $9.58 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 7% in 1999 to $1.76 compared to $1.64 in 1998.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $394,007 as compared to $492,078
in 1998, a decrease of $98,071, or 20%. This decrease was primarily due to
declines in depletion, the impairment of oil and gas properties and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $269,017 in 1999 and $282,430 in 1998, resulting in a
$13,413 decline, or 5%. The decline includes a reduction in ad valorem taxes and
less well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A increased 43% from $14,124 in 1998 to $20,244 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $14,514 in
1999 and $11,560 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $34,145 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $104,746 in 1999 compared to $161,379 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $56,633, or 35%. This decrease was primarily the result of an
increase in proved reserves of 125,332 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of
higher commodity prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis
from charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998
and a decline in oil production of 3,885 barrels for the period ended December
31, 1999 compared to the same period in 1998.
6
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $223,816 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to increases in oil and
gas sales receipts of $321,283, offset by increases in production costs paid of
$60,591, G&A expenses paid of $7,385 and working capital of $29,491. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $341,604 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $20,321 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were for
expenditures related to oil and gas equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $9,419 were recognized during 2000 from
equipment credits on one fully depleted well and proceeds of $7,220 in 1999 were
from equipment credits received on one active property and one temporarily
abandoned property.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $439,194, of which $4,392 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $434,802 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $154,362 of which
$1,544 was distributed to the managing general partner and $152,818 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 13
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 92,685 $ 122,649
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 122,067 72,167
----------- -----------
Total current assets 214,752 194,816
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,085,185 5,076,362
Accumulated depletion (4,014,368) (3,937,645)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,070,817 1,138,717
----------- -----------
$ 1,285,569 $ 1,333,533
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 15,770 $ 15,254
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 12,779 13,264
Limited partners (6,811 interests) 1,257,020 1,305,015
----------- -----------
1,269,799 1,318,279
----------- -----------
$ 1,285,569 $ 1,333,533
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $806,344 $488,752 $ 441,480
Interest 8,911 5,220 6,177
Gain on disposition of assets 9,419 - -
-------- -------- ---------
824,674 493,972 447,657
-------- -------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 329,608 269,017 282,430
General and administrative 27,629 20,244 14,124
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 34,145
Depletion 76,723 104,746 161,379
-------- -------- ---------
433,960 394,007 492,078
-------- -------- ---------
Net income (loss) $390,714 $ 99,965 $ (44,421)
======== ======== =========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 3,907 $ 1,000 $ (444)
======== ======== =========
Limited partners $386,807 $ 98,965 $ (43,977)
======== ======== =========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership
interest $ 56.79 $ 14.53 $ (6.46)
======== ======== =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ------------ ------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 16,209 $ 1,596,562 $ 1,612,771
Distributions (1,957) (193,717) (195,674)
Net loss (444) (43,977) (44,421)
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 13,808 1,358,868 1,372,676
Distributions (1,544) (152,818) (154,362)
Net income 1,000 98,965 99,965
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 13,264 1,305,015 1,318,279
Distributions (4,392) (434,802) (439,194)
Net income 3,907 386,807 390,714
-------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 12,779 $ 1,257,020 $ 1,269,799
======== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 390,714 $ 99,965 $ (44,421)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 34,145
Depletion 76,723 104,746 161,379
Gain on disposition of assets (9,419) - -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (49,900) (22,046) 37,507
Accounts payable 516 2,153 (8,189)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 408,634 184,818 180,421
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (8,823) (7,237) (9,047)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 9,419 7,220 -
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 596 (17) (9,047)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (439,194) (154,362) (195,674)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (29,964) 30,439 (24,300)
Cash at beginning of year 122,649 92,210 116,510
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 92,685 $ 122,649 $ 92,210
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $34,145 related to its
proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
15
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $315,080 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 390,714 $ 99,965 $ (44,421)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 68,390 96,496 149,296
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 34,145
Other, net (1,209) 3,745 3,688
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 457,895 $ 200,206 $ 142,708
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ----------
Development costs $ 8,823 $ 7,237 $ 9,047
========= ========= ==========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- ----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 200,177 $ 200,177
Completed wells and equipment 4,885,008 4,876,185
----------- -----------
5,085,185 5,076,362
Accumulated depletion (4,014,368) (3,937,645)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,070,817 $ 1,138,717
=========== ===========
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 122,715 $ 120,620 $ 119,432
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 24,038 $ 14,514 $ 11,560
16
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA
and P&P Employees 90-A, L.P., ("EMPL"), Parker & Parsley 90-A Conv., L.P. and
the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement. EMPL
is a limited partnership organized for the benefit of certain employees of
Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
--------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
and all other costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 147 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 90-A
Conv., L.P. is 74.274809% and 25.725191%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ -----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 398,405 594,075
Revisions (141,729) (152,757)
Production (32,915) (47,086)
------------ -----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 223,761 394,232
Revisions 206,682 351,371
Production (29,248) (43,302)
------------ -----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 401,195 702,301
Revisions 21,424 (168,710)
Production (28,519) (38,570)
------------ -----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 394,100 495,021
========== ==========
17
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.25 per barrel of NGLs and $7.89 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $3,042,000 and undiscounted was $5,865,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 12,560 $ 9,975 $ 2,464
Future production costs (6,695) (5,908) (1,931)
-------- ------- -------
5,865 4,067 533
10% annual discount factor (2,823) (1,884) (155)
-------- ------- -------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 3,042 $ 2,183 $ 378
======== ======= =======
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (477) $ (220) $ (159)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,267 1,209 (1,027)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (44) 1,476 (174)
Accretion of discount 218 38 162
Changes in production rates, timing and other (105) (698) (41)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 859 1,805 (1,239)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 2,183 378 1,617
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 3,042 $ 2,183 $ 378
======== ========= ========
18
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 54% 51% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 12% 11% -
NGTS LLC 10% 10% 3%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 2% 5% 22%
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 57%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.,
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and NGTS LLC were $37,832, $7,318 and $4,105, respectively,
which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in
the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general
partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all production
expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays
1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1%
of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
19
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $6,811,000.
Pioneer USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial
Partnership capital less commission and organization and offering costs
allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to
pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to
the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of Texas
with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until August 1997.
From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October 1996,
he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From June 1988
to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 15% during the first three years
and approximately 20% after three years of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, they are allocated approximately 15% during
the first three years and approximately 20% after three years of the Program's
revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 147 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
23
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 122,715 $ 120,620 $ 119,432
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 24,038 $ 14,514 $ 11,560
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
Dated: March 28, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 28, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President. Chief March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership -
of Parker & Parsley 90-A, L.P. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit A of the Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of Limited Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit C of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of General Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit D of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to -
Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-26097)
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4c
of the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
10(b) Form of Development Drilling Program -
Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit
B of the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-A, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 424,897 $ 362,257 $ 806,344 $ 488,752 $ 441,480 $ 643,882 $ 777,677
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 34,145 $ 321,019 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 210,534 $ 167,763 $ 390,714 $ 99,965 $ (44,421) $ (149,948) $ 261,210
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 2,105 $ 1,678 $ 3,907 $ 1,000 $ (444) $ (1,499) $ 2,612
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 208,429 $ 166,085 $ 386,807 $ 98,965 $ (43,977) $ (148,449) $ 258,598
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 30.60 $ 24.38 $ 56.79 $ 14.53 $ (6.46) $ (21.80) $ 37.97
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 19.99 $ 27.22 $ 63.84 $ 22.44 $ 28.44 $ 53.06 $ 53.75
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,365,095 $1,319,088 $1,285,569 $1,333,533 $1,385,777 $1,634,061 $2,146,498
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
90-B Conv., L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October
12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 11,897
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 8,765
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 3,221
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 272.55
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.25 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 166.60
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 156.33
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 253.04
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 264.40
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 155
(c), (f)
-----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2040, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-26097-08
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2329284
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000.................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................ 6
Notes to Financial Statements........................... 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K........................ 11
Signatures.............................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 369,346 $ 132,300
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 166,716 209,552
---------- ----------
Total current assets 536,062 341,852
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 9,564,578 9,628,120
Accumulated depletion (8,066,067) (8,075,752)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,498,511 1,552,368
---------- ----------
$ 2,034,573 $ 1,894,220
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 32,466 $ 15,580
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 20,020 18,785
Limited partners (11,897 interests) 1,982,087 1,859,855
---------- ----------
2,002,107 1,878,640
---------- ----------
$ 2,034,573 $ 1,894,220
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 338,348 $ 356,486 $ 763,083 $ 687,189
Interest 2,579 2,684 5,086 4,777
Gain on disposition of assets 1,079 - 3,054 2,023
-------- -------- -------- --------
342,006 359,170 771,223 693,989
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 138,987 143,700 282,193 277,308
General and administrative 9,322 11,592 22,884 21,724
Depletion 27,479 25,752 54,399 52,512
Abandoned property 3,059 - 3,059 -
-------- -------- -------- --------
178,847 181,044 362,535 351,544
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 163,159 $ 178,126 $ 408,688 $ 342,445
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,632 $ 1,781 $ 4,087 $ 3,424
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 161,527 $ 176,345 $ 404,601 $ 339,021
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 13,58 $ 14.83 $ 34.01 $ 28.50
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 18,785 $1,859,855 $1,878,640
Distributions (2,852) (282,369) (285,221)
Net income 4,087 404,601 408,688
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 20,020 $1,982,087 $2,002,107
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 408,688 $ 342,445
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 54,399 52,512
Gain on disposition of assets (3,054) (2,023)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 42,836 (25,998)
Accounts payable 16,886 12,818
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 519,755 379,754
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (542) (10,356)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 3,054 2,023
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 2,512 (8,333)
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (285,221) (362,661)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 237,046 8,760
Cash at beginning of period 132,300 132,031
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 369,346 $ 140,791
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized as a general
partnership in 1990 under the laws of the State of Texas and was converted to a
Delaware limited partnership on August 1, 1991.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 11% to $763,083 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $687,189 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
7
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 17,353 barrels
of oil, 6,410 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 35,369 mcf of gas were
sold, or 29,658 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 17,958 barrels of oil, 8,604 barrel of NGLs and 33,016 mcf of gas
were sold, or 32,065 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.54, or 2%, from $27.72
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $28.26 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.09, or 15%, from
$14.00 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.09 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 130% from $2.08 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.79 for the same period in 2001. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Gains on disposition of assets of $3,054 and $2,023 were recognized during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during the period in 2001 was due to salvage income received on one well plugged
and abandoned during the current year. The gain recognized during the period in
2000 was from the sale of equipment on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $362,535 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $351,544 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$10,991, or 3%. This increase was due to increases in production costs,
abandoned property costs, depletion and general and administrative expenses
("G&A").
Production costs were $282,193 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$277,308 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $4,885 increase, or 2%.
This increase was primarily due to higher production taxes associated with
higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
5% from $21,724 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $22,884 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $54,399 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$52,512 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,887, or 4%. This increase
was due to downward revisions to proved reserves on several wells during the
period ended June 30, 2001, offset by a reduction in the Partnership's net
depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long- Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121") during the
fourth quarter of 2000 and a decline in oil production of 605 barrels for the
six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Abandoned property costs of $3,059 were incurred during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 due to the plugging and abandonment of one well during the current
period.
8
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 5% to $338,348 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $356,486 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from lower average prices received for oil and
NGLs and a decline in production, offset by higher average prices received for
gas. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 8,598 barrels of oil, 3,171
barrels of NGLs and 16,373 mcf of gas were sold, or 14,498 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 8,968 barrels of oil, 4,625 barrels of NGLs and
17,395 mcf of gas were sold, or 16,492 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.51, or 2%, from $27.75
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.24 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $.22, or 2%, from $14.10
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $13.88 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 50% from $2.44 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.67 for the same period in 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $1,079 was recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2001 due to salvage income received on one well plugged and
abandoned during the current period.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $178,847 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $181,044 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$2,197, or 1%. This decrease was due to declines in production costs and G&A,
offset by increases in abandoned property costs and depletion.
Production costs were $138,987 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$143,700 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $4,713 decrease, or 3%. The
decrease was primarily due to lower workover expense.
During this period, G&A decreased 20% from $11,592 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $9,322 for the same period in 2001, principally due to a lower
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues and a
decline in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $27,479 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$25,752 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,727, or 7%. This increase
was due to downward revisions to proved reserves on several properties during
the period ended June 30, 2001, offset by a reduction in the Partnership's net
depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the
fourth quarter of 2000 and a decline in oil production of 370 barrels for the
three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
9
Abandoned property costs of $3,059 were incurred during the three months ended
June 30, 2001 due to the plugging and abandonment of one well during the current
period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $140,001 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase resulted from an increase of $76,203 in oil and gas sales receipts and
a reduction in working capital of $72,902, offset by increases in production
costs of $4,885, abandoned property costs of $3,059 and G&A expenses of $1,160.
The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity
prices during 2001 which contributed an additional $117,367 to oil and gas
receipts, offset by $41,164 resulting from the decline in production during 2001
as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in production costs was
primarily due to increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas
prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due to an increase in audit and tax
fees.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities for the six months ended June
30, 2001 and 2000 were for expenditures related to oil and gas equipment
upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $3,054 and $2,023 were received during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The proceeds recognized
during the period in 2001 were due to salvage income from one well plugged and
abandoned during the current year. The proceeds recognized during 2000 were
derived from the sale of equipment on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$285,221, of which $2,852 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$282,369 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $362,661, of which $3,627 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $359,034 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
10
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 6, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
---------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-26097-08
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2329284
------------------------------- --------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$11,817,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 11,897.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized in 1990 as a
general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership
converted to a Delaware limited partnership on August 1, 1991. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 11,897 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 48% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P., 10% to TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and 10% to Phillips
Petroleum Company. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or
2
other liabilities and compliance may increase the cost of the Partnership's
operations. The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards
such as oil spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or
gases that could expose the Partnership to substantial liability due to
pollution and other environmental damages. Although the Partnership believes
that its business operations do not impair environmental quality and that its
costs of complying with any applicable environmental regulations are not
currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what, if any, effect these
environmental regulations may have on its current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 104
oil and gas wells. One well has been plugged and abandoned. At December 31,
2000, the Partnership had 103 producing oil and gas wells.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
PART II
3
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 11,897 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 665 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $825,165 and $271,636, respectively,
of such revenue-related distributions were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------
Operating results:
------------------
Oil and gas sales $ 1,513,122 $ 907,791 $ 764,787 $ 1,118,628 $ 1,382,265
=========== =========== =========== =========== =============
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ 31,774 $ 88,497 $ 275,430 $ 328,594 $ 22,474
=========== =========== =========== =========== =============
Net income (loss) $ 787,438 $ 164,414 $ (373,956) $ (55,191) $ 544,919
=========== =========== =========== =========== =============
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 7,874 $ 1,644 $ (3,740) $ (552) $ 5,449
=========== =========== =========== =========== =============
Limited partners $ 779,564 $ 162,770 $ (370,216) $ (54,639) $ 539,470
=========== =========== =========== =========== =============
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 65.53 $ 13.68 $ (31.12) $ (4.59) $ 45.35
=========== =========== =========== =========== =============
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 69.36 $ 22.83 $ 23.66 $ 52.38 $ 56.21
=========== =========== =========== =========== =============
At year end:
------------
Identifiable assets $ 1,894,220 $ 1,949,209 $ 2,057,408 $ 2,727,510 $ 3,402,932
=========== =========== =========== =========== =============
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 67% to $1,513,122 for 2000 as
compared to $907,791 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 36,592
barrels of oil, 16,796 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 64,786 mcf of
gas were sold, or 64,186 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 36,383
barrels of oil, 17,481 barrels of NGLs and 70,803 mcf of gas were sold, or
65,665 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.00, or 70%, from
$17.23 in 1999 to $29.23 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.96, or 63%, from $9.49 in 1999 to $15.45 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 75% from $1.62 in 1999 to $2.84 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $2,023 recognized in 2000 was due to
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses decreased to $739,327 in 2000 as compared to $749,072
in 1999, a decrease of $9,745, or 1%. The decrease was due to declines in the
impairment of oil and gas properties and depletion, offset by increases in
production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $557,245 in 2000 and $478,183 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $79,062, or 17%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
30% from $35,038 in 1999 to $45,379 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $40,368 in 2000 and $27,181 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized
non-cash charges of $31,774 and $88,497 related to its oil and gas properties
during 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Depletion was $104,929 in 2000 compared to $147,354 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $42,425, or 29%. The decrease was primarily due to a 27,994 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges
taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 19% to $907,791 from
$764,787 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 36,383 barrels of oil,
17,481 barrels of NGLs and 70,803 mcf of gas were sold, or 65,665 BOEs. In 1998,
41,140 barrels of oil, 17,403 barrels of NGLs and 73,460 mcf of gas were sold,
or 70,786 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $4.11, or 31%, from
$13.12 in 1998 to $17.23 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.89, or 44%, from $6.60 in 1998 to $9.49 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.50 in 1998 to $1.62 in 1999.
Gain on disposition of assets of $1,669 for 1998 was attributable to credits
received from the disposal of oil and gas equipment on a fully depleted well and
on one well that was plugged and abandoned in a prior year.
Total costs and expenses decreased to $749,072 in 1999 as compared to $1,147,349
in 1998, a decrease of $398,277, or 35%. The decrease was due to declines in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset by
an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $478,183 in 1999 and $517,526 in 1998, resulting in a
$39,343 decrease, or 8%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs, ad valorem taxes and workover costs, offset by an increase in production
taxes due to increased oil and gas sales.
During this period, G&A increased 31% from $26,722 in 1998 to $35,038 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $27,181 in
1999 and $22,923 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized non-cash SFAS 121 charges of $88,497 and $275,430
related to its oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
6
Depletion was $147,354 in 1999 compared to $327,671 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $180,317, or 55%. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in
proved reserves of 280,631 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and
a decline in oil production of 4,757 barrels for the period ended December 31,
1999 compared to the same period in 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $504,622 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $611,256, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $79,062, G&A expenses paid of $10,341 and working capital of $17,231. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $632,790 to oil and gas receipts,
offset by $21,534 resulting from the decline in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance and
workover costs incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was
primarily due to higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $2,023 recognized in 2000 were due to
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
7
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $833,500, of which $8,335 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $825,165 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $274,380, of which
$2,744 was distributed to the managing general partner and $271,636 to the
limited partners.
8
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 14
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 15
9
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv.,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- ----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 132,300 $ 132,031
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 209,552 143,411
--------- ---------
Total current assets 341,852 275,442
--------- ---------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 9,628,120 9,612,816
Accumulated depletion (8,075,752) (7,939,049)
--------- ---------
Net oil and gas properties 1,552,368 1,673,767
--------- ---------
$ 1,894,220 $ 1,949,209
========== =========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 15,580 $ 24,507
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 18,785 19,246
Limited partners (11,897 interests) 1,859,855 1,905,456
--------- ---------
1,878,640 1,924,702
--------- ---------
$ 1,894,220 $ 1,949,209
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 1,513,122 $ 907,791 $ 764,787
Interest 11,620 5,695 6,937
Gain on disposition of assets 2,023 -- 1,669
----------- ----------- -----------
1,526,765 913,486 773,393
----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 557,245 478,183 517,526
General and administrative 45,379 35,038 26,722
Impairment of oil and gas properties 31,774 88,497 275,430
Depletion 104,929 147,354 327,671
----------- ----------- -----------
739,327 749,072 1,147,349
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 787,438 $ 164,414 $ (373,956)
=========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 7,874 $ 1,644 $ (3,740)
=========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 779,564 $ 162,770 $ (370,216)
=========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 65.53 $ 13.68 $ (31.12)
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
-------------- -------------- ----------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 26,929 $2,666,043 $2,692,972
Distributions (2,843) (281,505) (284,348)
Net loss (3,740) (370,216) (373,956)
------- -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 20,346 2,014,322 2,034,668
Distributions (2,744) (271,636) (274,380)
Net income 1,644 162,770 164,414
------- -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 19,246 1,905,456 1,924,702
Distributions (8,335) (825,165) (833,500)
Net income 7,874 779,564 787,438
------- -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 18,785 $1,859,855 $1,878,640
======== ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 787,438 $ 164,414 $(373,956)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 31,774 88,497 275,430
Depletion 104,929 147,354 327,671
Gain on disposition of assets (2,023) -- (1,669)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (66,141) (59,604) 42,963
Accounts payable (8,927) 1,767 (11,798)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 847,050 342,428 258,641
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (15,304) (12,347) (18,344)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 2,023 -- 1,669
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (13,281) (12,347) (16,675)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (833,500) (274,380) (284,348)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 269 55,701 (42,382)
Cash at beginning of year 132,031 76,330 118,712
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 132,300 $ 132,031 $ 76,330
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized as a
general partnership in 1990 under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Delaware limited partnership on August 1, 1991. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
15
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $31,774, $88,497 and
$275,430 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively.
16
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $233,211 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 787,438 $ 164,414 $(373,956)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 90,499 132,570 175,500
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 31,774 88,497 275,430
Other, net (1,742) (4,660) 3,987
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 907,969 $ 380,821 $ 80,961
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
----------- -------------- --------------
Development costs $ 15,304 $ 12,347 $ 18,344
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
------------ -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 369,498 $ 369,498
Completed wells and equipment 9,258,622 9,243,318
--------- ---------
9,628,120 9,612,816
Accumulated depletion (8,075,752) (7,939,049)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties $1,552,368 $1,673,767
========== ==========
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---------------------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 211,037 $ 214,306 $ 209,549
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 40,368 $ 27,181 $ 22,923
17
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 90-B Conv., L.P. ("EMPL"), Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. and the
Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement. EMPL is a
limited partnership organized for the benefit of certain employees of Pioneer
USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA(1) Partnerships(2)
-------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties:
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses:
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 80 limited partner interests
owned by Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 90-B,
L.P. is 26.94006% and 73.05994%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
-------------- -----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 914,930 864,646
Revisions (446,456) (190,771)
Production (58,543) (73,460)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 409,931 600,415
Revisions 435,645 666,249
Production (53,864) (70,803)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 791,712 1,195,861
Revisions 15,019 (155,368)
Production (53,388) (64,786)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 753,343 975,707
======== ========
18
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.19 per barrel of NGLs and $7.66 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $5,752,000 and undiscounted was $11,644,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 24,248 $ 19,527 $ 4,449
Future production costs (12,604) (10,978) (3,339)
-------- -------- --------
11,644 8,549 1,110
10% annual discount factor (5,892) (4,165) (375)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 5,752 $ 4,384 $ 735
======== ======== ========
19
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (956) $ (430) $ (247)
Net changes in prices and production costs 2,152 2,137 (2,389)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (71) 3,126 (518)
Accretion of discount 438 74 362
Changes in production rates, timing and other (195) (1,258) (94)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,368 3,649 (2,886)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 4,384 735 3,621
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 5,752 $ 4,384 $ 735
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil and
gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10% of
total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 48% 46% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 10% 11% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 58%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 5% 21%
Phillips Petroleum Company 10% 5% 5%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.,
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and Phillips Petroleum Company were $65,440, $13,643 and
$7,386, respectively, which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable -
oil and gas sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general
partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all production
expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The
20
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Under the Partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $11,897,000. The
managing general partner is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of
initial Partnership capital less commission and organization and offering
costs allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts
necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership
agreement to the extent its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
21
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of Texas
with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
22
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until August 1997.
From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October 1996,
he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From June 1988
to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
23
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 15% during the first three years
and approximately 20% after three years of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, they are allocated approximately 15% during
the first three years and approximately 20% after three years of the Program's
revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 80 limited partnership interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
24
2000 1999 1998
---------------------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 211,037 $ 214,306 $ 209,549
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 40,368 $ 27,181 $ 22,923
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
25
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
26
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
Dated: March 28, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
---------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 28, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership -
of Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.
incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of
the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of Limited Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit C of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of General Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit D of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to -
Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-26097)
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4c
of the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
10(b) Form of Development Drilling Program -
Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit
B of the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
28
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B CONV., L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 763,083 $ 687,189 $1,513,122 $ 907,791 $ 764,787 $1,118,628 $1,382,265
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 31,774 $ 88,497 $ 275,430 $ 328,594 $ 22,474
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 408,688 $ 342,445 $ 787,438 $ 164,414 $ (373,956) $ (55,191) $ 544,919
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 4,087 $ 3,424 $ 7,874 $ 1,644 $ (3,740) $ (552) $ 5,449
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 404,601 $ 339,021 $ 779,564 $ 162,770 $ (370,216) $ (54,639) $ 539,470
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 34.01 $ 28.50 $ 65.53 $ 13.68 $ (31.12) $ (4.59) $ 45.35
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 23.73 $ 30.18 $ 69.36 $ 22.83 $ 23.66 $ 52.38 $ 56.21
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $2,034,573 $1,941,811 $1,894,220 $1,949,209 $2,057,408 $2,727,510 $3,402,932
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
90-B, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 90-B, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 32,264
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 23,772
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 8,789
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 273.11
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.27 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 166.86
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 156.56
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 253.59
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 264.95
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 155
(c), (f)
-----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2040, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-26097-07
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
-----------------------------
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2329287
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................. 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 1,006,322 $ 364,895
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 454,542 568,283
----------- -----------
Total current assets 1,460,864 933,178
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 25,938,605 26,110,930
Accumulated depletion (21,873,017) (21,899,717)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 4,065,588 4,211,213
----------- -----------
$ 5,526,452 $ 5,144,391
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 88,337 $ 42,091
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 54,385 51,027
Limited partners (32,264 interests) 5,383,730 5,051,273
----------- -----------
5,438,115 5,102,300
----------- -----------
$ 5,526,452 $ 5,144,391
=========== ===========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
------------------------ ------------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 917,666 $ 966,583 $2,069,524 $1,863,518
Interest 7,073 7,402 14,158 13,142
Gain on disposition of assets 2,926 - 8,283 5,487
--------- --------- --------- ---------
927,665 973,985 2,091,965 1,882,147
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 376,953 389,681 765,323 752,025
General and administrative 25,284 31,430 61,934 58,911
Depletion 74,458 69,726 147,093 142,347
Abandoned property 8,296 - 8,296 -
--------- --------- --------- ---------
484,991 490,837 982,646 953,283
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income $ 442,674 $ 483,148 $1,109,319 $ 928,864
========= ========= ========= =========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 4,427 $ 4,832 $ 11,093 $ 9,289
========= ========= ========= =========
Limited partners $ 438,247 $ 478,316 $1,098,226 $ 919,575
========= ========= ========= =========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 13.58 $ 14.82 $ 34.04 $ 28.50
========= ========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 51,027 $5,051,273 $5,102,300
Distributions (7,735) (765,769) (773,504)
Net income 11,093 1,098,226 1,109,319
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 54,385 $5,383,730 $5,438,115
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $1,109,319 $ 928,864
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 147,093 142,347
Gain on disposition of assets (8,283) (5,487)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 113,741 (19,535)
Accounts payable 46,246 35,060
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,408,116 1,081,249
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,468) (28,083)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 8,283 5,487
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 6,815 (22,596)
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (773,504) (983,517)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 641,427 75,136
Cash at beginning of period 364,895 311,017
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $1,006,322 $ 386,153
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 11% to $2,069,524 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $1,863,518 for the same period in
2000. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received,
offset by a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001,
47,052 barrels of oil, 17,412 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 95,918
7
mcf of gas were sold, or 80,450 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six
months ended June 30, 2000, 48,699 barrels of oil, 23,339 barrels of NGLs and
89,536 mcf of gas were sold, or 86,961 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.54, or 2%, from $27.72
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $28.26 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $2.09, or 15%, from
$14.00 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.09 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 130% from $2.08 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.79 for the same period in 2001. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Gains on disposition of assets of $8,283 and $5,487 were recognized during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The gain recognized
during the period in 2001 was due to salvage income received from one well
plugged and abandoned during the current year. The gain recognized during the
period in 2000 was from the sale of equipment on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $982,646 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $953,283 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$29,363, or 3%. The increase was due to increases in production costs, abandoned
property costs, depletion and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $765,323 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$752,025 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $13,298 increase, or 2%.
The increase was primarily the result of higher production taxes associated with
higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
5% from $58,911 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $61,934 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to an increase in tax and audit fees.
Depletion was $147,093 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$142,347 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $4,746, or 3%. This
increase was primarily due to downward revisions to proved reserves on several
wells during the period ended June 30, 2001, offset by a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of"
("SFAS 121") during the fourth quarter of 2000 and a decline in oil production
of 1,647 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
Abandoned property costs of $8,296 were incurred during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 due to the plugging and abandonment of one well during the current
year.
8
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 5% to $917,666 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $966,583 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in production and lower average
prices received for oil and NGLs, offset by higher average prices received for
gas. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 23,315 barrels of oil, 8,603
barrels of NGLs and 44,414 mcf of gas were sold, or 39,320 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 24,312 barrels of oil, 12,529 barrels of NGLs and
47,154 mcf of gas were sold, or 44,700 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.51, or 2%, from $27.75
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.24 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $.22, or 2%, from $14.10
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $13.88 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 50% from $2.44 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.67 for the same period in 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $2,926 was recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2001 due to salvage income received from one well plugged and
abandoned during the current period.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $484,991 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $490,837 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$5,846, or 2%. This decrease was due to declines in production costs and G&A,
offset by increases in abandoned property costs and depletion.
Production costs were $376,953 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$389,681 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $12,728 decrease, or 3%.
This decrease was primarily due to lower workover expense.
During this period, G&A decreased 20% from $31,430 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $25,284 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues and a
decline in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $74,458 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$69,726 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $4,732, or 7%. This increase
was primarily due to downward revisions to proved reserves on several wells
during the period ended June 30, 2001, offset by a reduction in the
Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS
121 during the fourth quarter of 2000 and a decline in oil production of 997
barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period
in 2000.
Abandoned property costs of $8,296 were incurred during the three months ended
June 30, 2001 due to the plugging and abandonment of one well during the current
period.
9
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $326,867 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase resulted from an increase of $207,022 in oil and gas sales receipts and
a reduction in working capital of $144,462, offset by increases in production
costs of $13,298, abandoned property costs of $8,296 and G&A expenses of $3,023.
The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity
prices during 2001 which contributed an additional $318,339 to oil and gas
receipts, offset by $111,317 resulting from the decline in production during
2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in production costs
was primarily due to increased production taxes associated with higher oil and
gas prices. The increase in G&A was primarily due to an increase in audit and
tax fees.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities for the six months ended June
30, 2001 and 2000 were related to expenditures for upgrades of oil and gas
equipment on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $8,283 and $5,487 were received during the
six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The proceeds recognized
during the period in 2001 were due to salvage income from one well plugged and
abandoned during the current year. The proceeds recognized during 2000 were from
the sale of equipment on one fully depleted well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$773,504, of which $7,735 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$765,769 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $983,517, of which $9,835 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $973,682 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
10
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
--------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 6, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-26097-07
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2329287
-------------------------------------- --------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code: (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$32,181,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 32,264.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 32,264 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA supplies all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 48% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P., 10% to TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and 10% to Phillips
Petroleum Company. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 104
oil and gas wells. One well has been plugged and abandoned. At December 31,
2000, the Partnership had 103 producing oil and gas wells.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 32,264 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 2,201 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $2,237,802 and $736,663,
respectively, of such revenue-related distributions were made to the limited
partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------------ ----------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 4,103,548 $ 2,461,819 $ 2,074,056 $ 3,033,675 $ 3,748,608
=========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ 86,231 $ 240,063 $ 744,642 $ 891,257 $ 61,080
=========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) $ 2,136,271 $ 447,469 $(1,011,459) $ (149,382) $ 1,479,052
=========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 21,363 $ 4,475 $ (10,115) $ (1,494) $ 14,790
=========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 2,114,908 $ 442,994 $(1,001,344) $ (147,888) $ 1,464,262
=========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited partnership
interest $ 65.55 $ 13.73 $ (31.04) $ (4.58) $ 45.38
=========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 69.36 $ 22.83 $ 23.66 $ 52.38 $ 56.25
=========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $ 5,144,391 $ 5,292,769 $ 5,585,045 $ 7,399,664 $ 9,230,704
=========== =========== ========== =========== ===========
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT' DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 67% to $4,103,548 for 2000 as
compared to $2,461,819 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 99,252
barrels of oil, 45,552 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 175,696 mcf
of gas were sold, or 174,087 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 98,658
barrels of oil, 47,406 barrels of NGLs and 192,016 mcf of gas were sold, or
178,067 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in
the future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.00, or 70%, from
$17.23 in 1999 to $29.23 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.96, or 63%, from $9.49 in 1999 to $15.45 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 75% from $1.62 in 1999 to $2.84 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $5,487 recognized in 2000 was due to equipment
credits received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 2000 to $2,004,420 as compared to
$2,029,978 in 1999, a decrease of $25,558, or 1%. The decrease was due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties and depletion, offset by
increases in production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $1,511,223 in 2000 and $1,296,822 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $214,401, or 17%. The increase was primarily due to higher
production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well
maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
31% from $93,562 in 1999 to $122,731 in 2000 primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $109,474 in 2000 and $73,707 in
1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized
non-cash charges of $86,231 and $240,063 related to its oil and gas properties
during 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Depletion was $284,235 in 2000 compared to $399,531 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $115,296, or 29%. This decrease was primarily due to an 81,075
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 19% to $2,461,819 from
$2,074,056 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 98,658 barrels of oil,
47,406 barrels of NGLs and 192,016 mcf of gas were sold, or 178,067 BOEs. In
1998, 111,585 barrels of oil, 47,190 barrels of NGLs and 199,215 mcf of gas were
sold, or 191,978 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $4.11, or 31%, from
$13.12 in 1998 to $17.23 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.89, or 44%, from $6.60 in 1998 to $9.49 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 8% from $1.50 in 1998 to $1.62 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $4,527 recognized during 1998 was due to
credits received from the disposal of oil and gas equipment on one fully
depleted well and one well that was plugged and abandoned in a prior year.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $2,029,978 as compared to
$3,108,696 in 1998, a decrease of $1,078,718, or 35%. The decrease was due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production
costs, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $1,296,822 in 1999 and $1,403,494 in 1998, resulting in a
$106,672 decrease, or 8%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs, ad valorem taxes and workover costs.
During this period, G&A increased 29% from $72,284 in 1998 to $93,562 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $73,707 in
1999 and $62,152 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized non-cash SFAS 121 charges of $240,063 and $744,642
related to its oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
6
Depletion was $399,531 in 1999 compared to $888,276 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $488,745, or 55%. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in
proved reserves of 761,146 barrels of oil during 1999 due to higher commodity
prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges taken
in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998 and a decline in
oil production of 12,927 barrels for the period ended December 31, 1999 compared
to the same period in 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $1,473,163 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $1,657,757 and a decline in working capital of
$58,976, offset by increases in production costs paid of $214,401 and G&A
expenses paid of $29,169. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the
increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an additional
$1,715,313 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $57,556 resulting from the decline
in production during 2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to
increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and
additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well
production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the
managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $5,487 recognized in 2000 were due to
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
7
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $2,260,406, of which $22,604
was distributed to the managing general partner and $2,237,802 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $744,104, of which
$7,441 was distributed to the managing general partner and $736,663 to the
limited partners.
8
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 10
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 11
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 12
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 13
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 14
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 15
9
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- ----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 364,895 $ 311,017
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 568,283 441,577
----------- ----------
Total current assets 933,178 752,594
----------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 26,110,930 26,069,426
Accumulated depletion (21,899,717) (21,529,251)
----------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 4,211,213 4,540,175
----------- ----------
$ 5,144,391 $ 5,292,769
=========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 42,091 $ 66,334
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 51,027 52,268
Limited partners (32,264 interests) 5,051,273 5,174,167
----------- ----------
5,102,300 5,226,435
----------- ----------
$ 5,144,391 $ 5,292,769
=========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 4,103,548 $ 2,461,819 $ 2,074,056
Interest 31,656 15,628 18,654
Gain on disposition of assets 5,487 - 4,527
---------- ---------- ----------
4,140,691 2,477,447 2,097,237
---------- ---------- ----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 1,511,223 1,296,822 1,403,494
General and administrative 122,731 93,562 72,284
Impairment of oil and gas properties 86,231 240,063 744,642
Depletion 284,235 399,531 888,276
---------- ---------- ----------
2,004,420 2,029,978 3,108,696
---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 2,136,271 $ 447,469 $(1,011,459)
========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 21,363 $ 4,475 $ (10,115)
========= ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 2,114,908 $ 442,994 $(1,001,344)
========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 65.55 $ 13.73 $ (31.04)
========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 73,061 $ 7,232,631 $ 7,305,692
Distributions (7,712) (763,451) (771,163)
Net loss (10,115) (1,001,344) (1,011,459)
--------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 55,234 5,467,836 5,523,070
Distributions (7,441) (736,663) (744,104)
Net income 4,475 442,994 447,469
--------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 52,268 5,174,167 5,226,435
Distributions (22,604) (2,237,802) (2,260,406)
Net income 21,363 2,114,908 2,136,271
--------- ---------- ----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 51,027 $ 5,051,273 $ 5,102,300
========= ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- -----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 2,136,271 $ 447,469 $ (1,011,459)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 86,231 240,063 744,642
Depletion 284,235 399,531 888,276
Gain on disposition of assets (5,487) - (4,527)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (126,706) (214,284) 116,516
Accounts payable (24,243) 4,359 (31,997)
---------- ---------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 2,350,301 877,138 701,451
---------- ---------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (41,504) (33,486) (49,747)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 5,487 - 4,527
---------- ---------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities (36,017) (33,486) (45,220)
---------- ---------- -----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (2,260,406) (744,104) (771,163)
---------- ---------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 53,878 99,548 (114,932)
Cash at beginning of year 311,017 211,469 326,401
---------- ---------- -----------
Cash at end of year $ 364,895 $ 311,017 $ 211,469
========== ========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the unit-of-
production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil (dominant
mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants. The
carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
15
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $86,231, $240,063 and
$744,642 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively.
16
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $632,807 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ -------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 2,136,271 $ 447,469 $ (1,011,459)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 246,057 359,438 475,607
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 86,231 240,063 744,642
Other, net (4,768) (12,935) 11,120
------------ ------------ -------------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 2,463,791 $ 1,034,035 $ 219,910
============ ============ =============
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Development costs $ 41,504 $ 33,486 $ 49,747
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
------------ -------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 1,002,057 $ 1,002,057
Completed wells and equipment 25,108,873 25,067,369
------------ -------------
26,110,930 26,069,426
Accumulated depletion (21,899,717) (21,529,251)
------------ -------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 4,211,213 $ 4,540,175
============ =============
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 572,323 $ 581,191 $ 568,275
--------- --------- ---------
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 109,474 $ 73,707 $ 62,152
17
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA
and P&P Employees 90-B Conv., L.P. ("EMPL"), Parker & Parsley 90-B Conv., L.P.
and the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement.
EMPL is a limited partnership organized for the benefit of certain employees of
Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA(1) Partnerships(2)
-------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 83 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 90-B
Conv., L.P. is 73.05994% and 26.94006%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 2,481,201 2,344,959
Revisions (1,210,571) (517,240)
Production (158,775) (199,215)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 1,111,855 1,628,504
Revisions 1,181,592 1,807,095
Production (146,064) (192,016)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 2,147,383 3,243,583
Revisions 46,430 (419,625)
Production (144,804) (175,696)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 2,049,009 2,648,262
============ ==========
18
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.19 per barrel of NGLs and $7.66 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $15,617,000 and undiscounted was
$31,632,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider probable reserves, anticipated
future oil and gas prices, interest rates, changes in development and production
costs and risks associated with future production. Because of these and other
considerations, any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and
imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 65,926 $ 52,962 $ 12,063
Future production costs (34,294) (29,776) (9,053)
---------- ---------- ----------
31,632 23,186 3,010
10% annual discount factor (16,015) (11,296) (1,016)
---------- ---------- ----------
Standardized measure of discounted future net
cash flows $ 15,617 $ 11,890 $ 1,994
========== ========== ==========
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- ----------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (2,592) $ (1,165) $ (671)
Net changes in prices and production costs 5,824 5,796 (6,480)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (153) 8,478 (1,405)
Accretion of discount 1,189 199 982
Changes in production rates, timing and other (541) (3,412) (254)
---------- ---------- ---------
Change in present value of future net revenues 3,727 9,896 (7,828)
---------- ---------- ---------
Balance, beginning of year 11,890 1,994 9,822
---------- ---------- ---------
Balance, end of year $ 15,617 $ 11,890 $ 1,994
========== ========== =========
19
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 48% 46% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 10% 11% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 58%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 5% 22%
Phillips Petroleum Company 10% 5% 5%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.,
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and Phillips Petroleum Company were $177,462, $37,001 and
$20,032, respectively, which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable -
oil and gas sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general
partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all production
expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The
20
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Under the Partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$32,264,000. The managing general partner is required to contribute
amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership capital less commission and
organization and offering costs allocated to the limited partners and to
contribute amounts necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to it
under the Partnership agreement to the extent its share of revenues does
not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
21
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
22
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
23
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 15% during the first three years
and approximately 20% after three years of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, they are allocated approximately 15% during
the first three years and approximately 20% after three years of the Program's
revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 83 limited partnership interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
24
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 572,323 $ 581,191 $ 568,275
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 109,474 $ 73,707 $ 62,152
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
25
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
26
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
Dated: March 28, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 28, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 28, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership -
of Parker & Parsley 90-B, L.P. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit A of the Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of Limited Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit C of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of General Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit D of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to -
Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4c
of the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
10(b) Form of Development Drilling Program -
Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit
B of the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
28
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-B, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $2,069,524 $1,863,518 $4,103,548 $2,461,819 $ 2,074,056 $3,033,675 $3,748,608
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ 86,231 $ 240,063 $ 744,642 $ 891,257 $ 61,080
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $1,109,319 $ 928,864 $2,136,271 $ 447,469 $(1,011,459) $ (149,382) $1,479,052
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 11,093 $ 9,289 $ 21,363 $ 4,475 $ (10,115) $ (1,494) $ 14,790
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $1,098,226 $ 919,575 $2,114,908 $ 442,994 $(1,001,344) $ (147,888) $1,464,262
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per
limited partnership
interest $ 34.04 $ 28.50 $ 65.55 $ 13.73 $ (31.04) $ (4.58) $ 45.38
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 23.73 $ 30.18 $ 69.36 $ 22.83 $ 23.66 $ 52.38 $ 56.25
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $5,526,452 $5,273,176 $5,144,391 $5,292,769 $ 5,585,045 $7,399,664 $9,230,704
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
---------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
---------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
90-C Conv., L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October
12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources
USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 7,531
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 4,950
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding $ 1,858
Pioneer USA(a),(b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b),(c) $247.75
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for 3.37 times
the past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b),(c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $139.39
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $132.75
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c),(d) $229.72
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c),(e) $240.43
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 149
(c),(f)
---------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2) (A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP, of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2040, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-26097-10
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2347264
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................. 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 221,203 $ 106,593
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 89,315 119,396
---------- ----------
Total current assets 310,518 225,989
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,801,749 5,798,493
Accumulated depletion (5,028,486) (5,000,618)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 773,263 797,875
---------- ----------
$ 1,083,781 $ 1,023,864
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 23,477 $ 14,074
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 10,572 10,067
Limited partners (7,531 interests) 1,049,732 999,723
---------- ----------
1,060,304 1,009,790
---------- ----------
$ 1,083,781 $ 1,023,864
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 213,193 $ 221,187 $ 444,118 $ 414,898
Interest 1,624 1,946 3,412 3,443
-------- -------- -------- --------
214,817 223,133 447,530 418,341
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 97,643 77,437 193,283 161,148
General and administrative 6,504 7,156 14,679 13,090
Depletion 14,385 12,574 27,868 26,316
-------- -------- -------- --------
118,532 97,167 235,830 200,554
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 96,285 $ 125,966 $ 211,700 $ 217,787
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 963 $ 1,260 $ 2,117 $ 2,178
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 95,322 $ 124,706 $ 209,583 $ 215,609
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 12.66 $ 16.56 $ 27.83 $ 28.63
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 10,067 $ 999,723 $1,009,790
Distributions (1,612) (159,574) (161,186)
Net income 2,117 209,583 211,700
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 10,572 $1,049,732 $1,060,304
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 211,700 $ 217,787
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 27,868 26,316
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 30,081 (13,427)
Accounts payable 9,403 7,249
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 279,052 237,925
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (3,256) (15,344)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (161,186) (216,896)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 114,610 5,685
Cash at beginning of period 106,593 107,295
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 221,203 $ 112,980
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized as a general
partnership in 1990 under the laws of the State of Texas and was converted to a
Delaware limited partnership on August 1, 1991.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 7% to $444,118 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $414,898 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
7
a decline in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 11,505 barrels
of oil, 2,477 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 17,805 mcf of gas were
sold, or 16,950 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 11,959 barrels of oil, 4,427 barrels of NGLs and 14,092 mcf of
gas were sold, or 18,735 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased slightly from $27.46 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.55 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.24, or 25%, from $12.80
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.04 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 133% from $2.11 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.91 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $235,830 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $200,554 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$35,276, or 18%. This increase was due to increases in production costs, general
and administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $193,283 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$161,148 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $32,135 increase, or 20%.
The increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production and higher production taxes associated
with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
12% from $13,090 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $14,679 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $27,868 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$26,316 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,552, or 6%. This increase
was the result of a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of
454 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to the same period
in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 4% to $213,193 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $221,187 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in production and lower average
prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 5,694 barrels of oil, 1,618
8
barrels of NGLs and 9,654 mcf of gas were sold, or 8,921 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 6,157 barrels of oil, 2,484 barrels of NGLs and
7,658 mcf of gas were sold, or 9,917 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.75, or 3%, from $27.75
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.00 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.82, or 14%, from
$12.68 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.50 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 52% from $2.44
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.72 for the same period in
2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $118,532 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $97,167 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$21,365, or 22%. This increase was due to increases in production costs and
depletion, offset by a decrease in G&A.
Production costs were $97,643 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$77,437 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $20,206 increase, or 26%.
The increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 9% from $7,156 for the three months ended June
30, 2000 to $6,504 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of a decline in oil and gas revenues and a
decline in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $14,385 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$12,574 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $1,811, or 14%. This
increase was the result of a reduction in proved reserves during the period
ended June 30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil
production of 463 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 compared to
the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $41,127 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to a reduction in working capital of $45,662 and an increase of
$29,189 in oil and gas sales receipts, offset by increases in production costs
of $32,135 and G&A expenses of $1,589. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $54,741 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $25,552 resulting from the
decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance
and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production and increased
production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices. The increase in G&A
was primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A
being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased
oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
9
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were related to expenditures for oil and gas equipment
upgrades on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$161,186, of which $1,612 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$159,574 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $216,896, of which $2,169 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $214,727 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
10
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 7, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
--------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-26097-10
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2347264
------------------------------- --------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code: (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section
12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$7,501,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 7,531.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") is a general partnership
organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Texas. The Partnership
converted to a Delaware limited partnership on August 1, 1991. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 7,531 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 64% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 44
oil and gas wells. One well was sold and one well was plugged and abandoned due
to uneconomical operations. At December 31, 2000, the Partnership had 42
producing oil and gas wells.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 7,531 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 505 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $492,300 and $135,825, respectively,
of such revenue-related distributions were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 917,184 $ 537,893 $ 430,499 $ 661,475 $ 837,849
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ - $ - $ 185,784 $ 79,288 $ -
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) $ 509,518 $ 137,106 $ (258,625) $ 105,740 $ 359,349
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 5,095 $ 1,371 $ (2,586) $ 1,057 $ 3,593
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 504,423 $ 135,735 $ (256,039) $ 104,683 $ 355,756
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 66.98 $ 18.02 $ (34.00) $ 13.90 $ 47.24
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 65.37 $ 18.04 $ 17.30 $ 47.53 $ 51.98
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $ 1,023,864 $ 1,014,263 $ 1,011,034 $ 1,411,804 $ 1,661,127
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 71% to $917,184 for 2000 as
compared to $537,893 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and an increase in production. In 2000, 23,602 barrels
of oil, 9,171 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 30,423 mcf of gas were
sold, or 37,844 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 23,568 barrels of
oil, 9,050 barrels of NGLs and 29,399 mcf of gas were sold, or 37,518 BOEs. Due
to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas properties,
management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the future until
the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.21, or 71%, from
$17.13 in 1999 to $29.34 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.60, or 60%, from $9.31 in 1999 to $14.91 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 70% from $1.70 in 1999 to $2.89 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than received in 2000.
Gains on dispositions of assets of $388 and $104 recognized during 2000 and
1999, respectively, were due to equipment credits received on a fully depleted
well in each year.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $416,488 compared to $405,150 in
1999, an increase of $11,338, or 3%. This increase was due to increases in
production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a
decline in depletion.
Production costs were $334,055 in 2000 and $297,353 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $36,702, or 12%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period G&A increased
45% from $20,987 in 1999 to $30,429 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $27,439 in 2000 and $16,060 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
Depletion was $52,004 in 2000 as compared to $86,810 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $34,806, or 40%. This decrease was primarily due to a 31,374 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 25% to $537,893 from
$430,499 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 23,568 barrels of oil,
9,050 barrels of NGLs and 29,399 mcf of gas were sold, or 37,518 BOEs. In 1998,
24,493 barrels of oil, 8,694 barrels of NGLs and 30,348 mcf of gas were sold, or
38,245 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.89, or 29%, from
$13.24 in 1998 to $17.13 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.51, or 37%, from $6.80 in 1998 to $9.31 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 10% from $1.55 in 1998 to $1.70 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $405,150 compared to $693,871 in
1998, a decrease of $288,721, or 42%. This decrease was due to declines in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset by
an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $297,353 in 1999 and $314,363 in 1998, resulting in a
decrease of $17,010, or 5%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production taxes.
During this period G&A increased 39% from $15,084 in 1998 to $20,987 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $16,060 in
1999 and $12,838 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $185,784 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $86,810 in 1999 compared to $178,640 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $91,830, or 51%. This decrease was primarily the result of an
increase in proved reserves of 207,077 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of
higher commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable
basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter
of 1998.
6
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $330,268 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $383,466, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $36,702, G&A expenses paid of $9,442 and working capital of $7,054. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $377,706 to oil and gas receipts and
$5,760 resulting from the increase in production during 2000. The increase in
production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes associated with
higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well
production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher percentage of the
managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from dispositions of assets of $388 and $104 recognized during 2000 and
1999, respectively, were related to equipment credits received on a fully
depleted well in each year.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $497,273, of which $4,973 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $492,300 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $137,197, of which
$1,372 was distributed to the managing general partner and $135,825 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P:
Independent Auditors' Report.......................................... 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999....................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................. 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................. 13
Notes to Financial Statements......................................... 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv.,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
------------- ------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 106,593 $ 107,295
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 119,396 79,853
------------- ------------
Total current assets 225,989 187,148
------------- ------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 5,798,493 5,775,729
Accumulated depletion (5,000,618) (4,948,614)
------------- ------------
Net oil and gas properties 797,875 827,115
------------- ------------
$ 1,023,864 $ 1,014,263
============= ============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 14,074 $ 16,718
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 10,067 9,945
Limited partners (7,531 interests) 999,723 987,600
------------- ------------
1,009,790 997,545
------------- ------------
$ 1,023,864 $ 1,014,263
============= ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 917,184 $ 537,893 $ 430,499
Interest 8,434 4,259 4,747
Gain on disposition of assets 388 104 -
---------- ---------- ----------
926,006 542,256 435,246
---------- ---------- ----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 334,055 297,353 314,363
General and administrative 30,429 20,987 15,084
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 185,784
Depletion 52,004 86,810 178,640
---------- ---------- ----------
416,488 405,150 693,871
---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 509,518 $ 137,106 $ (258,625)
========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 5,095 $ 1,371 $ (2,586)
========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 504,423 $ 135,735 $ (256,039)
========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 66.98 $ 18.02 $ (34.00)
========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
------------- ------------- -------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 13,848 $ 1,374,010 $ 1,387,858
Distributions (1,316) (130,281) (131,597)
Net loss (2,586) (256,039) (258,625)
----------- ------------ ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 9,946 987,690 997,636
Distributions (1,372) (135,825) (137,197)
Net income 1,371 135,735 137,106
----------- ------------ ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 9,945 987,600 997,545
Distributions (4,973) (492,300) (497,273)
Net income 5,095 504,423 509,518
----------- ------------ ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 10,067 $ 999,723 $ 1,009,790
=========== ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------- -------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 509,518 $ 137,106 $ (258,625)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 185,784
Depletion 52,004 86,810 178,640
Gain on disposition of assets (388) (104) -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (39,543) (38,453) 28,491
Accounts payable (2,644) 3,320 (10,548)
----------- ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by operating
activities 518,947 188,679 123,742
----------- ------------ ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (22,764) (10,512) (13,347)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 388 104 -
----------- ------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities (22,376) (10,408) (13,347)
----------- ------------ ------------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (497,273) (137,197) (131,597)
----------- ------------ ------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (702) 41,074 (21,202)
Cash at beginning of year 107,295 66,221 87,423
----------- ------------ ------------
Cash at end of year $ 106,593 $ 107,295 $ 66,221
=========== ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P. (the "Partnership") is a general
partnership organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Texas. The
Partnership converted to a Delaware limited partnership on August 1, 1991. The
Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied
in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful
efforts method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under
this method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive
development wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are
expensed. Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of- production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income (loss) of the Partnership is included in
the individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $185,784 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
15
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $49,618 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income (loss) per Federal income tax returns for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- --------------- -------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 509,518 $ 137,106 $ (258,625)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 40,369 76,676 50,997
Impairment of oil and gas properties
for financial reporting purposes - - 185,784
Intangible development costs capitalized for
financial reporting purposes and expensed for
tax reporting purposes (385) - -
Other, net (1,143) (1,786) 1,870
------------- -------------- ------------
Net income (loss) per Federal
income tax returns $ 548,359 $ 211,996 $ (19,974)
============= ============== ============
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------ ------------
Development costs $ 22,764 $ 10,512 $ 13,347
============ =========== ===========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
------------ ------------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 226,701 $ 226,701
Completed wells and equipment 5,571,792 5,549,028
----------- -----------
5,798,493 5,775,729
Accumulated depletion (5,000,618) (4,948,614)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 797,875 $ 827,115
=========== ===========
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
16
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 130,806 $ 126,701 $ 124,074
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 27,439 $ 16,060 $ 12,838
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 90-C Conv., L.P. ("EMPL"), Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. and the
Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties to the Program agreement. EMPL is a
limited partnership organized for the benefit of certain employees of Pioneer
USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships (2)
--------------- ----------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and depletable
properties -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs
and all other costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level and 30 limited partner interests owned by
Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.
is 38.349119% and 61.650881%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table represents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 424,601 426,720
Revisions (204,124) (171,338)
Production (33,187) (30,348)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 187,290 225,034
Revisions 293,912 357,964
Production (32,618) (29,399)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 448,584 553,599
Revisions 50,848 (55,441)
Production (32,773) (30,423)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 466,659 467,735
========== ==========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.22 per barrel of NGLs and $7.80 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $3,245,000 and undiscounted was $6,366,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 14,206 $ 11,167 $ 2,041
Future production costs (7,840) (6,472) (1,624)
------------ ------------ ------------
6,366 4,695 417
10% annual discount factor (3,121) (2,211) (116)
------------ ------------ ------------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 3,245 $ 2,484 $ 301
============ ============ ============
18
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (583) $ (241) $ (116)
Net changes in prices and production costs 932 1,084 (1,115)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 257 2,216 (238)
Accretion of discount 248 30 167
Changes in production rates, timing and other (93) (906) (65)
------------ ------------ ------------
Change in present value of future net revenues 761 2,183 (1,367)
------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, beginning of year 2,484 301 1,668
------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, end of year $ 3,245 $ 2,484 $ 301
============ ============ ============
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 64% 62% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 69%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 2% 3% 13%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $48,722 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the Partnership agreement, the managing general
partner pays
19
1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1%
of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it
is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share
of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $7,531,000. Pioneer USA
is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership
capital less commission and organization and offering costs allocated to
the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs and
expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the extent
its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 15% during the first three years
and approximately 20% after three years of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, they are allocated approximately 15% during
the first three years and approximately 20% after three years of the Program's
revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers of
Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and administrative
expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 30 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
23
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 130,806 $ 126,701 $ 124,074
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 27,439 $ 16,060 $ 12,838
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes
thereto, or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
Dated: March 26, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 26, 2001
--------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 26, 2001
-------------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 26, 2001
-------------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 26, 2001
-------------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 26, 2001
-------------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 26, 2001
-------------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership -
of Parker & Parsley 90-C Conv., L.P.
incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of
the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of Limited Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit C of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of General Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit D of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to -
Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-26097)
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4c
of the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
10(b) Form of Development Drilling Program -
Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit
B of the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C CONV., L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 444,118 $ 414,898 $ 917,184 $ 537,893 $ 430,499 $ 661,475 $ 837,849
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 185,784 $ 79,288 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 211,700 $ 217,787 $ 509,518 $ 137,106 $ (258,625) $ 105,740 $ 359,349
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 2,117 $ 2,178 $ 5,095 $ 1,371 $ (2,586) $ 1,057 $ 3,593
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 209,583 $ 215,609 $ 504,423 $ 135,735 $ (256,039) $ 104,683 $ 355,756
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 27.83 $ 28.63 $ 66.98 $ 18.02 $ (34.00) $ 13.90 $ 47.24
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 21.19 $ 28.51 $ 65.37 $ 18.04 $ 17.30 $ 47.53 $ 51.98
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,083,781 $1,022,403 $1,023,864 $1,014,263 $1,011,034 $1,411,804 $1,661,127
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
90-C, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 90-C, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 12,107
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 7,958
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 2,984
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 247.05
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for 3.36 times
the past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 138.59
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 131.96
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 229.02
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 239.73
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 149
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP, of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2039, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-26097-09
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2347262
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................. 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 346,965 $ 162,620
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 143,592 191,950
---------- ----------
Total current assets 490,557 354,570
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 9,327,018 9,321,783
Accumulated depletion (8,084,866) (8,040,111)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,242,152 1,281,672
---------- ----------
$ 1,732,709 $ 1,636,242
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 37,845 $ 22,567
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 16,899 16,087
Limited partners (12,107 interests) 1,677,965 1,597,588
---------- ----------
1,694,864 1,613,675
---------- ----------
$ 1,732,709 $ 1,636,242
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 342,737 $ 355,412 $ 713,977 $ 666,799
Interest 2,505 3,011 5,313 5,335
-------- -------- -------- ---------
345,242 358,423 719,290 672,134
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 156,985 124,494 310,730 259,060
General and administrative 10,457 11,499 23,553 21,038
Depletion 23,106 20,219 44,755 42,327
-------- -------- -------- --------
190,548 156,212 379,038 322,425
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 154,694 $ 202,211 $ 340,252 $ 349,709
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,547 $ 2,022 $ 3,403 $ 3,497
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 153,147 $ 200,189 $ 336,849 $ 346,212
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 12.65 $ 16.54 $ 27.82 $ 28.60
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 16,087 $1,597,588 $1,613,675
Distributions (2,591) (256,472) (259,063)
Net income 3,403 336,849 340,252
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 16,899 $1,677,965 $1,694,864
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 340,252 $ 349,709
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 44,755 42,327
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 48,358 (21,390)
Accounts payable 15,278 11,754
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 448,643 382,400
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (5,235) (24,668)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (259,063) (348,687)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 184,345 9,045
Cash at beginning of period 162,620 164,100
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 346,965 $ 173,145
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 7% to $713,977 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $666,799 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
a decline in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 18,497 barrels
7
of oil, 3,982 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 28,625 mcf of gas were
sold, or 27,250 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 19,227 barrels of oil, 7,105 barrels of NGLs and 22,664 mcf of
gas were sold, or 30,109 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased slightly from $27.46 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.55 for the same period in 2001. The
average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.24, or 25%, from $12.80
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.04 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per mcf of gas increased 133% from $2.11 during the
six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.91 for the same period in 2001. The market
price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received during the six months ended
June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $379,038 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $322,425 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$56,613, or 18%. This increase was due to increases in production costs, general
and administrative expenses ("G&A") and depletion.
Production costs were $310,730 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$259,060 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $51,670 increase, or 20%.
This increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover
costs incurred to stimulate well production and higher production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
12% from $21,038 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $23,553 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $44,755 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$42,327 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $2,428, or 6%. This increase
was the result of a reduction in proved reserves during the period ended June
30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil production of
730 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to the same period
in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 4% to $342,737 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $355,412 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decline in production and lower average
prices received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for gas and
NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 9,158 barrels of oil, 2,603
barrels of NGLs and 15,519 mcf of gas were sold, or 14,348 BOEs. For the three
8
months ended June 30, 2000, 9,904 barrels of oil, 3,979 barrels of NGLs and
12,323 mcf of gas were sold, or 15,937 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.75, or 3%, from $27.75
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.00 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.82, or 14%, from
$12.68 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.50 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 52% from $2.44
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.72 for the same period in
2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $190,548 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $156,212 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$34,336, or 22%. This increase was due to increases in production costs and
depletion, offset by a decrease in G&A.
Production costs were $156,985 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$124,494 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $32,491 increase, or 26%.
The increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 9% from $11,499 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $10,457 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of a decline in oil and gas revenues and a
decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $23,106 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$20,219 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $2,887, or 14%. This
increase was the result of a reduction in proved reserves during the period
ended June 30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decline in oil
production of 746 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 compared to
the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $66,243 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to a reduction in working capital of $73,272 and an increase of
$47,156 in oil and gas sales receipts, offset by increases in production costs
of $51,670 and G&A expenses of $2,515. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $88,093 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $40,937 resulting from the
decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance
and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production and higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices. The increase in G&A was
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
9
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were related to expenditures for upgrades of oil and gas
equipment on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$259,063, of which $2,591 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$256,472 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $348,687, of which $3,487 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $345,200 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
10
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 7, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
--------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-26097-09
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2347262
-------------------------------- -------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$12,080,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 12,107.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
Parts I and II of this annual report on Form 10-K (the "Report") contain forward
looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no
assurances can be given that the actual events and results will not be
materially different than the anticipated results described in the forward
looking statements. See "Item 1. Business" for a description of various factors
that could materially affect the ability of the Partnership to achieve the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 12,107 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 64% was attributable to sales made to
Plains Marketing, L.P. Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one
purchaser would not have an adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil,
natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial liability due to pollution and other
environmental damages. Although the Partnership believes that
2
its business operations do not impair environmental quality and that its costs
of complying with any applicable environmental regulations are not currently
significant, the Partnership cannot predict what, if any, effect these
environmental regulations may have on its current or future operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas are located. Such property interests are often subject to
landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 44
oil and gas wells. One well was sold and one well was plugged and abandoned due
to uneconomical operations. At December 31, 2000, the Partnership had 42
producing oil and gas wells.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and changes in such quantities for
the years then ended, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements included in
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" below. Such reserves have
been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent
petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 12,107 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 901 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $791,434 and $218,354, respectively,
of such revenue-related distributions were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $1,474,499 $ 864,722 $ 692,090 $1,063,396 $ 1,346,937
========== ========== ========== ========== ===========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ 298,622 $ 127,213 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ===========
Net income (loss) $ 818,778 $ 220,855 $ (416,064) $ 168,261 $ 577,803
========== ========== ========== ========== ===========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 8,188 $ 2,209 $ (4,161) $ 1,683 $ 5,778
========== ========== ========== ========== ===========
Limited partners $ 810,590 $ 218,646 $ (411,903) $ 166,578 $ 572,025
========== ========== ========== ========== ===========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 66.95 $ 18.06 $ (34.02) $ 13.76 $ 47.25
========== ========== ========== ========== ===========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 65.37 $ 18.04 $ 17.30 $ 47.53 $ 51.98
========== ========== ========== ========== ===========
At year end:
-------------
Identifiable assets $1,636,242 $1,621,156 $1,617,114 $2,261,689 $ 2,664,141
========== ========== ========== ========== ===========
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 71% to $1,474,499 for 2000 as
compared to $864,722 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and an increase in production. In 2000, 37,944 barrels
of oil, 14,742 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 48,907 mcf of gas
were sold, or 60,837 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 37,886 barrels
of oil, 14,547 barrels of NGLs and 47,265 mcf of gas were sold, or 60,311 BOEs.
Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas properties,
management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the future until
the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.21, or 71%, from
$17.13 in 1999 to $29.34 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.60, or 60%, from $9.31 in 1999 to $14.91 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 70% from $1.70 in 1999 to $2.89 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gains on disposition of assets of $624 and $167 recognized during 2000 and 1999,
respectively, were due to equipment credits received on a fully depleted well in
each year.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $669,449 as compared to $650,544
in 1999, an increase of $18,905, or 3%. This increase was due to increases in
production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a
decline in depletion.
Production costs were $537,048 in 2000 and $477,835 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $59,213, or 12%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period G&A increased
47% from $33,223 in 1999 to $48,801 in 2000 primarily due to a higher percentage
of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and
gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The Partnership
paid the managing general partner $44,112 in 2000 and $25,818 in 1999 for G&A
incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by
the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the allocated expenses
based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the
non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
5
Depletion was $83,600 in 2000 compared to $139,486 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $55,886, or 40%. This decrease was primarily due to a 50,718 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 25% to $864,722 from
$692,090 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 37,886 barrels of oil,
14,547 barrels of NGLs and 47,265 mcf of gas were sold, or 60,311 BOEs. In 1998,
39,380 barrels of oil, 13,978 barrels of NGLs and 48,787 mcf of gas were sold,
or 61,489 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.89, or 29%, from
$13.24 in 1998 to $17.13 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.51, or 37%, from $6.80 in 1998 to $9.31 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 10% from $1.55 in 1998 to $1.70 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $650,544 as compared to $1,115,454
in 1998, a decrease of $464,910, or 42%. This decrease was due to declines in
the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset
by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $477,835 in 1999 and $505,571 in 1998, resulting in a
$27,736 decrease, or 5%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes, offset by an increase in production taxes
During this period G&A increased 37% from $24,190 in 1998 to $33,223 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $25,818 in
1999 and $20,639 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $298,622 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $139,486 in 1999 compared to $287,071 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $147,585, or 51%. This decrease was primarily the result of an
increase in proved reserves of 332,733 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of
higher commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable
basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter
of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998,
6
weather patterns, regional economic recessions and political matters combined to
cause worldwide oil supplies to exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline
in oil prices. Also during 1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for
natural gas declined. During 1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and certain other crude oil exporting nations
announced reductions in their planned export volumes. Those announcements,
together with the enactment of the announced reductions in export volumes, had a
positive impact on world oil prices, as have overall natural gas supply and
demand fundamentals on North American natural gas prices. Although the favorable
commodity price environment and stable field service cost environment is
expected to continue during 2001, there is no assurance that commodity prices
will not return to a less favorable level or that field service costs will not
escalate in the future, both of which could negatively impact the Partnership's
future results of operations and cash distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $532,008 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $616,371, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $59,213, G&A expenses paid of $15,578 and working capital of $9,572. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $607,017 to oil and gas receipts and
an increase of $9,354 resulting from the increase in production during 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from disposition of assets of $624 and $167 recognized during 2000 and
1999, respectively, were related to equipment credits received on a fully
depleted well in each year.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $799,428, of which $7,994 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $791,434 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $220,560, of which
$2,206 was distributed to the managing general partner and $218,354 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.:
Independent Auditors' Report......................................................... 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998................................................................ 13
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................ 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 162,620 $ 164,100
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 191,950 128,379
--------- ---------
Total current assets 354,570 292,479
--------- ---------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 9,321,783 9,285,188
Accumulated depletion (8,040,111) (7,956,511)
--------- ---------
Net oil and gas properties 1,281,672 1,328,677
--------- ---------
$ 1,636,242 $ 1,621,156
========= =========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 22,567 $ 26,831
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 16,087 15,893
Limited partners (12,107 interests) 1,597,588 1,578,432
--------- ---------
1,613,675 1,594,325
$ 1,636,242 $ 1,621,156
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 1,474,499 $ 864,722 $ 692,090
Interest 13,104 6,510 7,300
Gain on disposition of assets 624 167 --
----------- ----------- -----------
1,488,227 871,399 699,390
----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 537,048 477,835 505,571
General and administrative 48,801 33,223 24,190
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 298,622
Depletion 83,600 139,486 287,071
----------- ----------- -----------
669,449 650,544 1,115,454
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 818,778 $ 220,855 $ (416,064)
=========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 8,188 $ 2,209 $ (4,161)
=========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 810,590 $ 218,646 $ (411,903)
=========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 66.95 $ 18.06 $ (34.02)
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
-------------- -------------- ----------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 22,166 $2,199,485 $2,221,651
Distributions (2,115) (209,442) (211,557)
Net loss (4,161) (411,903) (416,064)
------- -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 15,890 1,578,140 1,594,030
Distributions (2,206) (218,354) (220,560)
Net income 2,209 218,646 220,855
------- -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 15,893 1,578,432 1,594,325
Distributions (7,994) (791,434) (799,428)
Net income 8,188 810,590 818,778
------- -------- --------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 16,087 $1,597,588 $1,613,675
======== ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------------ -------------- ---------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 818,778 $ 220,855 $(416,064)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 298,622
Depletion 83,600 139,486 287,071
Gain on disposition of assets (624) (167) -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (63,571) (62,010) 45,989
Accounts payable (4,264) 3,747 (16,954)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by operating
activities 833,919 301,911 198,664
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (36,595) (16,900) (21,456)
Proceeds from disposition of assets 624 167 -
------- ------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities (35,971) (16,733) (21,456)
------- ------- -------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (799,428) (220,560) (211,557)
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (1,480) 64,618 (34,349)
Cash at beginning of year 164,100 99,482 133,831
------- ------- -------
Cash at end of year $ 162,620 $ 164,100 $ 99,482
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income (loss)
per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in the
financial statements as the income (loss) of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $298,622 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
15
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $81,171 less than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income (loss) per Federal income tax returns for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 818,778 $ 220,855 $(416,064)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 64,630 123,267 81,152
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes -- -- 298,622
Intangible development costs capitalized for
financial reporting purposes and expensed for
tax reporting purposes (619) -- --
Other, net (1,775) (4,424) 4,552
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per Federal income
tax return $ 881,014 $ 339,698 $ (31,738)
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
----------- ------------- --------------
Development costs $ 36,595 $ 16,900 $ 21,456
======== ======== ========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 364,450 $ 364,450
Completed wells and equipment 8,957,333 8,920,738
----------- -----------
9,321,783 9,285,188
Accumulated depletion (8,040,111) (7,956,511)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,281,672 $ 1,328,677
=========== ===========
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------------ -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 210,287 $ 203,686 $ 199,461
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 44,112 $ 25,818 $ 20,639
16
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA
and P&P Employees 90-C Conv., L.P. ("EMPL") (the "Entities"), Parker & Parsley
90-C Conv., L.P. and the Partnership (the "Partnerships") are parties to the
Program agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership organized for the benefit of
certain employees of Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December
28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and the
Partnerships as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnerships(2)
--------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and depletable
properties:
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues:
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs
and all other costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses:
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After first three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 27 limited partner interests
owned by Pioneer USA.
(2) The allocation between the Partnership and Parker & Parsley 90-C
Conv., L.P. is 61.650881% and 38.349119%, respectively.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------- ------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 682,212 685,617
Revisions (327,935) (275,264)
Production (53,358) (48,787)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 300,919 361,566
Revisions 472,259 575,173
Production (52,433) (47,265)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 720,745 889,474
Revisions 82,135 (88,650)
Production (52,686) (48,907)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 750,194 751,917
======== ========
17
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.22 per barrel of NGLs and $7.80 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $5,217,000 and undiscounted was $10,234,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by
applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 22,838 $ 17,942 $ 3,279
Future production costs (12,604) (10,399) (2,609)
-------- -------- --------
10,234 7,543 670
10% annual discount factor (5,017) (3,552) (187)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 5,217 $ 3,991 $ 483
======== ======== ========
18
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (937) $ (387) $ (187)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,497 1,742 (1,792)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 417 3,560 (381)
Accretion of discount 399 48 268
Changes in production rates, timing and other (150) (1,455) (105)
-------- --------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,226 3,508 (2,197)
-------- --------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 3,991 483 2,680
-------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 5,217 $ 3,991 $ 483
========= ========== =========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 64% 62% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 69%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 2% 3% 13%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $78,327 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not
have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil, NGLs
and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of the
limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the Partnership
is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to manage, control
and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As managing general
partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all production
expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the Partnership. The
majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are received directly
by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and gas revenue is
initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to the Partnership.
Under the Partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is
allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
19
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any limited
partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his share of any
undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$12,107,000. The managing general partner is required to contribute
amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership capital less commission and
organization and offering costs allocated to the limited partners and to
contribute amounts necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to it
under the Partnership agreement to the extent its share of revenues does
not cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of Texas
with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School of
Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice President
of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until August 1997.
From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October 1996,
he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From June 1988
to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with
a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by Pioneer USA, the managing general partner. The
Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax
partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program
agreement, Pioneer USA pays approximately 10% of the Program's acquisition,
drilling and completion costs and approximately 15% during the first three years
and approximately 20% after three years of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, they are allocated approximately 15% during
the first three years and approximately 20% after three years of the Program's
revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers or
employees of Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and
administrative expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 27 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
23
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 210,287 $ 203,686 $199,461
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 44,112 $ 25,818 $ 20,639
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes thereto,
or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
Dated: March 26, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 26, 2001
-------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 26, 2001
------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership -
of Parker & Parsley 90-C, L.P. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit A of the Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of Limited Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit C of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Form of General Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit D of the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of the
Partnership's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to -
Exhibit B of Amendment No. 1 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-26097)
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4c
of the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
10(b) Form of Development Drilling Program -
Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit
B of the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of
the Partnership's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-26097)
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 90-C, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 713,977 $ 666,799 $1,474,499 $ 864,722 $ 692,090 $1,063,396 $1,346,937
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 298,622 $ 127,213 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 340,252 $ 349,709 $ 818,778 $ 220,855 $ (416,064) $ 168,261 $ 577,803
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 3,403 $ 3,497 $ 8,188 $ 2,209 $ (4,161) $ 1,683 $ 5,778
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 336,849 $ 346,212 $ 810,590 $ 218,646 $ (411,903) $ 166,578 $ 572,025
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 27.82 $ 28.60 $ 66.95 $ 18.06 $ (34.02) $ 13.76 $ 47.25
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 21.18 $ 28.51 $ 65.37 $ 18.04 $ 17.30 $ 47.53 $ 51.98
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,732,709 $1,633,932 $1,636,242 $1,621,156 $1,617,114 $2,261,689 $2,664,141
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
Private Investment 90, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus
dated October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a
special meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the
special meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and
into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock
of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker & Parsley
Private Investment 90, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of
limited partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of
June 30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 10,970
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 9,030
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 3,360
USA(a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b),(c) $ 307.98
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of 3.28 times
Distributions for the past four quarterly distributions including the
distribution in July 2001(b),(c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001(c) $ 163.59
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 156.96
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 287.97
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c),(e) $ 298.81
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial $ 165
Investment(c),(f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should not
assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the value
or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the operating
period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as in the
merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share of
the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3% of
the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July 13,
2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses represent
estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell the assets
of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs associated with
such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP, of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2040, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 382,161 $ 168,054
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 136,254 197,750
---------- ----------
Total current assets 518,415 365,804
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 8,474,146 8,464,366
Accumulated depletion (7,141,170) (7,073,249)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,332,976 1,391,117
---------- ----------
$ 1,851,391 $ 1,756,921
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 34,418 $ 13,453
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 22,383 21,649
Limited partners (274.25 interests) 1,794,590 1,721,819
---------- ----------
1,816,973 1,743,468
---------- ----------
$ 1,851,391 $ 1,756,921
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 325,097 $ 354,405 $ 722,006 $ 692,013
Interest 2,673 3,526 5,593 5,952
-------- -------- -------- --------
327,770 357,931 727,599 697,965
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 141,149 125,781 261,648 238,333
General and administrative 8,129 11,169 19,906 21,297
Depletion 45,248 27,085 67,921 58,913
-------- -------- -------- --------
194,526 164,035 349,475 318,543
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 133,244 $ 193,896 $ 378,124 $ 379,422
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,332 $ 1,939 $ 3,781 $ 3,794
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 131,912 $ 191,957 $ 374,343 $ 375,628
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 480.99 $ 699.94 $1,364.97 $1,369.66
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 21,649 $1,721,819 $1,743,468
Distributions (3,047) (301,572) (304,619)
Net income 3,781 374,343 378,124
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 22,383 $1,794,590 $1,816,973
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 378,124 $ 379,422
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 67,921 58,913
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 61,496 (32,670)
Accounts payable 20,965 11,585
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 528,506 417,250
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (9,780) (29,680)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (304,619) (367,336)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 214,107 20,234
Cash at beginning of period 168,054 174,341
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 382,161 $ 194,575
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P. (the "Partnership") was organized
in 1990 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas and was
converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1991.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 4% to $722,006 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $692,013 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received, offset by
6
a decrease in production. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 17,815 barrels
of oil, 4,772 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 29,299 mcf of gas were
sold, or 27,470 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, 19,734 barrels of oil, 6,946 barrels of NGLs and 24,989 mcf of
gas were sold, or 30,845 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $.36, or 1%, from $27.42
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.78 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.03, or 22%, from
$14.06 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $17.09 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 132% from $2.14
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.97 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $349,475 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $318,543 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$30,932, or 10%. This increase was due to higher production costs and depletion,
offset by a decrease in general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $261,648 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$238,333 for the same period in 2000, resulting in a $23,315 increase, or 10%.
The increase was the result of additional well maintenance and workover costs
incurred to stimulate well production and higher production taxes due to higher
oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
7%, from $21,297 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $19,906 for the same
period in 2001, due to a decrease in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $67,921 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$58,913 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $9,008, or 15%. The increase
was the result of a decrease in proved reserves during the period ended June 30,
2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decrease in oil production of
1,919 barrels for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same
period in 2000.
7
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 8% to $325,097 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $354,405 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
and NGLs, offset by a decrease in production and lower average prices received
for oil. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 8,406 barrels of oil, 2,746
barrels of NGLs and 14,386 mcf of gas were sold, or 13,550 BOEs. For the three
months ended June 30, 2000, 9,833 barrels of oil, 3,739 barrels of NGLs and
12,235 mcf of gas were sold, or 15,611 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.32, or 1%, from $27.56
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.24 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.02, or
7%, from $14.06 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $15.08 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 51% to
$3.81 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.52 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses increased to $194,526 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $164,035 for the same period in 2000, an increase of
$30,491, or 19%. This increase was due to increases in depletion and production
costs, offset by a decrease in G&A.
Production costs were $141,149 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$125,781 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $15,368 increase, or 12%.
This increase was due to additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred
to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 27%, from $11,169 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $8,129 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $45,248 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$27,085 for the same period in 2000, an increase of $18,163, or 67%. This
increase was attributable to a decrease in proved reserves during the period
ended June 30, 2001 due to lower commodity prices, offset by a decrease in oil
production of 1,427 barrels for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared
to the same period in 2000.
8
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $111,256 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000 This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $29,634 and
reductions in working capital of $103,546 and G&A expenses of $1,391, offset by
an increase in production costs of $23,315. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in commodity prices during 2001 which contributed an
additional $98,698 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $69,064 resulting from the
decline in production during 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to additional well maintenance
and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production and increased
production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices. The decrease in G&A
was due to a decrease in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on
various oil and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$304,619, of which $3,047 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$301,572 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $367,336, of which $3,674 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $363,662 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
9
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90,
L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations,
partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley Private
Investment 90, L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 168,054 $ 174,341
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 197,750 117,410
----------- -----------
Total current assets 365,804 291,751
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 8,464,366 8,438,988
Accumulated depletion (7,073,249) (6,916,963)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,391,117 1,522,025
----------- -----------
$ 1,756,921 $ 1,813,776
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 13,453 $ 24,649
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 21,649 22,105
Limited partners (274.25 interests) 1,721,819 1,767,022
----------- -----------
1,743,468 1,789,127
----------- -----------
$ 1,756,921 $ 1,813,776
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 1,508,541 $ 776,849 $ 648,378
Interest 14,348 7,221 9,116
Gain on disposition of assets 2,385 - -
----------- ----------- -----------
1,525,274 784,070 657,494
----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 502,676 379,923 481,924
General and administrative 41,729 29,997 20,196
Impairment of oil and gas properties 49,757 - 373,422
Depletion 106,529 143,268 224,780
----------- ----------- -----------
700,691 553,188 1,100,322
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 824,583 $ 230,882 $ (442,828)
=========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 8,246 $ 2,309 $ (4,428)
=========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 816,337 $ 228,573 $ (438,400)
=========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 2,976.62 $ 833.45 $ (1,598.54)
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 29,418 $ 2,491,033 $ 2,520,451
Distributions (2,635) (260,830) (263,465)
Net loss (4,428) (438,400) (442,828)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 22,355 1,791,803 1,814,158
Distributions (2,559) (253,354) (255,913)
Net income 2,309 228,573 230,882
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 22,105 1,767,022 1,789,127
Distributions (8,702) (861,540) (870,242)
Net income 8,246 816,337 824,583
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 21,649 $ 1,721,819 $ 1,743,468
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 824,583 $ 230,882 $(442,828)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 49,757 - 373,422
Depletion 106,529 143,268 224,780
Gain on disposition of assets (2,385) - -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (80,340) (50,462) 48,403
Accounts payable (11,196) 4,017 (8,903)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 886,948 327,705 194,874
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (25,378) (14,048) (11,793)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 2,385 2,124 11,927
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities (22,993) (11,924) 134
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (870,242) (255,913) (263,465)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (6,287) 59,868 (68,457)
Cash at beginning of year 174,341 114,473 182,930
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 168,054 $ 174,341 $ 114,473
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley Private Investment 90, L.P. (the "Partnership") was
organized in 1990 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas
and was converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1991. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the unit-of-
production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil (dominant
mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants. The
carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non- partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally discounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $49,757 and $373,422
related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000 and 1998, respectively.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $139,996 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 824,583 $ 230,882 $(442,828)
Depletion and depreciation for tax reporting purposes
less than amounts for financial reporting purposes 93,056 131,771 204,399
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 49,757 - 373,422
Other, net (1,853) 432 13,939
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 965,543 $ 363,085 $ 148,932
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
---------- --------- ----------
Development costs $ 25,378 $ 14,048 $ 11,793
========== ========= ==========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 98,110 $ 98,110
Completed wells and equipment 8,366,256 8,340,878
----------- -----------
8,464,366 8,438,988
Accumulated depletion (7,073,249) (6,916,963)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,391,117 $ 1,522,025
=========== ===========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 186,568 $ 174,796 $ 187,435
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 37,554 $ 23,205 $ 16,483
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 90 Private Conv., L.P. ("EMPL") and the Partnership are parties to
the Program agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership organized for the benefit
of certain employees of Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on
December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
--------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated at
the Partnership level.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ ---------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 745,340 883,417
Revisions (342,345) (365,103)
Production (49,468) (54,218)
--------- ---------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 353,527 464,096
Revisions 394,885 538,864
Production (46,335) (47,331)
--------- ---------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 702,077 955,629
Revisions 172,617 (96,553)
Production (52,913) (49,484)
--------- ---------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 821,781 809,592
========= =========
10
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.49 per barrel of NGLs and $7.81 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $5,749,000 and undiscounted was $12,495,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 25,174 $ 17,513 $ 3,860
Future production costs (12,679) (9,819) (3,004)
--------- --------- ---------
12,495 7,694 856
10% annual discount factor (6,746) (3,770) (271)
--------- --------- ---------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 5,749 $ 3,924 $ 585
========= ========= =========
11
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (1,006) $ (397) $ (166)
Net changes in prices and production costs 1,905 2,019 (1,974)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 1,043 2,961 (437)
Accretion of discount 392 58 299
Changes in production rates, timing and other (509) (1,302) (128)
-------- -------- --------
Change in present value of future net revenues 1,825 3,339 (2,406)
-------- -------- --------
Balance, beginning of year 3,924 585 2,991
-------- -------- --------
Balance, end of year $ 5,749 $ 3,924 $ 585
======== ======== ========
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 71% 69% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 64%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 4% 17%
At December 31, 2000, the amount receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
was $93,082 which is included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas
sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the Partnership agreement, the managing general
partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating and general and administrative
expenses. The managing general partner is also responsible for 1% of
guaranty and loan commitment fees. In return, it is allocated 1% of the
Partnership's revenues.
12
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $10,970,000. The
managing general partner is required to contribute amounts equal to 1%
of initial Partnership capital less commission, organization and
offering costs allocated to the limited partners and to contribute
amounts necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the
Partnership agreement to the extent that its share of revenues does not
cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 94% to $1,508,541 for 2000 as
compared to $776,849 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and an increase in production. In 2000, 39,040 barrels
of oil, 13,873 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 49,484 mcf of gas
were sold, or 61,160 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 32,789 barrels
of oil, 13,546 barrels of NGLs and 47,331 mcf of gas were sold, or 54,224 BOEs.
Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas properties,
management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the future until
the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.05, or 70%, from
$17.30 in 1999 to $29.35 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.36, or 67%, from $9.46 in 1999 to $15.82 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 69% from $1.72 in 1999 to $2.90 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $700,691 as compared to $553,188
in 1999, an increase of $147,503, or 27%. The increase was primarily due to
increases in the impairment of oil and gas properties, production costs and
general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a decline in depletion.
Production costs were $502,676 in 2000 and $379,923 in 1999, resulting in a
$122,753 increase, or 32%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
39% from $29,997 in 1999 to $41,729 in 2000, primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $37,554 in 2000 and $23,205 in
1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long- Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets
to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $49,757 related to its oil and gas properties during 2000.
Depletion was $106,529 in 2000 as compared to $143,268 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $36,739, or 26%. This decrease was primarily due to a 148,753
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices, offset by an increase in oil production of 6,251 barrels for
the period ended December 31, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 20% to $776,849 from
$648,378 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 32,789 barrels of oil,
13,546 barrels of NGLs and 47,331 mcf of gas were sold, or 54,224 BOEs. In 1998,
35,555 barrels of oil, 13,913 barrels of NGLs and 54,218 mcf of gas were sold,
or 58,504 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $4.11, or 31%, from
$13.19 in 1998 to $17.30 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.69, or 40%, from $6.77 in 1998 to $9.46 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 10% from $1.57 in 1998 to $1.72 in 1999.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $553,188 as compared to $1,100,322
in 1998, a decrease of $547,134, or 50%. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in the impairment of oil and gas properties, production costs and
depletion, offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $379,923 in 1999 and $481,924 in 1998, resulting in a
$102,001 decrease, or 21%. The decrease was due to declines in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 49% from $20,196 in 1998 to $29,997 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $23,205 in
1999 and $16,483 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized a non-cash SFAS 121 charge of $373,422 related to its
oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $143,268 in 1999 compared to $224,780 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $81,512, or 36%. This decrease was the result of an increase in
proved reserves of 266,736 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $559,243 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $738,819, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $122,753, G&A expenses paid of $11,732 and working capital of $45,091. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $543,958 to oil and gas receipts and
an increase of $194,861 resulting from the increase in production during 2000.
The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $2,385 and $2,124 recognized during 2000 and
1999, respectively, were due to equipment credits received on active properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $870,242, of which $8,702 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $861,540 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $255,913, of which
$2,559 was distributed to the managing general partner and $253,354 to the
limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY PRIVATE INVESTMENT 90, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 722,006 $ 692,013 $1,508,541 $ 776,849 $ 648,378 $1,043,119 $1,237,784
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 49,757 $ -- $ 373,422 $ -- $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 378,124 $ 379,422 $ 824,583 $ 230,882 $ (442,828) $ 403,823 $ 571,998
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 3,781 $ 3,794 $ 8,246 $ 2,309 $ (4,428) $ 4,038 $ 5,720
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 374,343 $ 375,628 $ 816,337 $ 228,573 $ (438,400) $ 399,785 $ 566,278
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 1,364.97 $ 1,369.66 $ 2,976.62 $ 833.45 $(1,598.54) $ 1,457.74 $ 2,064.82
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 1,099.62 $ 1,326.02 $ 3,141.44 $ 923.81 $ 951.07 $ 2,289.37 $ 2,184.00
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,851,391 $1,837,447 $1,756,921 $1,813,776 $1,834,790 $2,549,986 $2,769,711
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.,
A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P., and supplements the proxy
statement/prospectus dated October 12, 2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources
Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., by which Pioneer USA is
soliciting proxies to be voted at a special meeting of limited partners of the
partnership. The purpose of the special meeting is for you to vote upon the
merger of the partnership with and into Pioneer USA that, if completed, will
result in your receiving common stock of Pioneer Natural Resources Company for
your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's financial statements, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 5,200
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 3,954
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 1,617
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 310.90
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 4.39 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 160.21
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 141.88
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 290.41
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 301.56
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 168
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2040, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000
(Unaudited)
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 188,742 $ 47,337
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 66,291 91,915
---------- ----------
Total current assets 255,033 139,252
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 3,666,171 3,666,171
Accumulated depletion (3,062,806) (3,046,352)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 603,365 619,819
---------- ----------
$ 858,398 $ 759,071
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 15,591 $ 12,584
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 9,701 8,737
Limited partners (130 interests) 833,106 737,750
---------- ----------
842,807 746,487
---------- ----------
$ 858,398 $ 759,071
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 150,668 $ 139,968 $ 334,282 $ 273,886
Interest 1,268 1,364 2,341 2,496
-------- -------- -------- --------
151,936 141,332 336,623 276,382
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 51,876 54,969 105,616 113,454
General and administrative 4,521 4,356 10,895 8,721
Depletion 8,093 9,014 16,454 22,396
-------- -------- -------- --------
64,490 68,339 132,965 144,571
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 87,446 $ 72,993 $ 203,658 $ 131,811
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 875 $ 730 $ 2,037 $ 1,318
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 86,571 $ 72,263 $ 201,621 $ 130,493
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited
partnership interest $ 665.93 $ 555.87 $1,550.93 $1,003.79
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 8,737 $ 737,750 $ 746,487
Distributions (1,073) (106,265) (107,338)
Net income 2,037 201,621 203,658
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 9,701 $ 833,106 $ 842,807
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 203,658 $ 131,811
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion 16,454 22,396
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 25,624 (9,399)
Accounts payable 3,007 (52,750)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 248,743 92,058
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties - (2,051)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (107,338) (161,017)
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 141,405 (71,010)
Cash at beginning of period 47,337 84,843
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 188,742 $ 13,833
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P. (the "Partnership") was
organized in 1990 as a general partnership under the laws of the State of Texas
and was converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1991.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto contained in the Partnership's report for the year ended
December 31, 2000, a copy of which is available upon request by writing to Rich
Dealy, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor
Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039-3746.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 22% to $334,282 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $273,886 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
6
and NGLs and an increase in production, offset by lower average prices received
for oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 8,138 barrels of oil, 2,371
barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 14,921 mcf of gas were sold, or
12,996 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 7,948 barrels of oil, 2,767 barrels of NGLs and 9,984 mcf of gas were
sold, or 12,379 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased slightly from $27.19 for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.13 for the same period ended June 30,
2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $3.52, or 27%,
from $13.22 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.74 for the same
period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 133% from
$2.12 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.95 for the same period in
2001. The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past
decade and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $132,965 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $144,571 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $11,606,
or 8%. This decrease was attributable to declines in production costs and
depletion, offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $105,616 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$113,454 for the same period in 2000, a $7,838 decrease, or 7%. This decrease
was primarily due to lower well maintenance costs, offset by increases in
production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
25% from $8,721 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $10,895 for the same
period in 2001, primarily due to a higher allocation of the managing general
partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a
result of increased oil and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $16,454 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$22,396 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $5,942, or 27%. This decrease
was primarily the result of an increase in proved reserves on a significant well
during the period ended June 30, 2001.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 8% to $150,668 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $139,968 for the same period in 2000.
The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for gas
7
and NGLs, offset by a decline in production and lower average prices received
for oil. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, production included 4,092
barrels of oil, 1,224 barrels of NGLs and 6,744 mcf of gas, or 6,440 BOEs. For
the three months ended June 30, 2000, 3,809 barrels of oil, 1,691 barrels of
NGLs and 6,034 mcf of gas were sold, or 6,506 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $1.10, or 4%, from $27.40
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.30 for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.93, or
16%, from $12.42 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.35 for the
same period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 56% to
$3.78 during the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.42 during the same
period in 2000.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $64,490 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $68,339 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$3,849, or 6%. This decrease was due to lower production costs and depletion,
offset by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $51,876 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$54,969 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $3,093 decrease, or 6%. The
decrease was primarily due to lower well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A increased 4% from $4,356 for the three months ended June
30, 2000 to $4,521 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a higher
allocation of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Depletion was $8,093 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$9,014 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $921, or 10%. This decrease
was primarily the result of an increase in proved reserves on a significant well
during the period ended June 30, 2001.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $156,685 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due to an increase in oil and gas sales receipts of $60,241 and
reductions in working capital of $90,780 and production costs of $7,838, offset
by an increase in G&A expenses of $2,174. The increase in oil and gas receipts
resulted from the increase in gas and NGL prices of $37,922 during 2001 and an
increase in production of $22,954, offset by a $635 decline in oil prices as
compared to the same period in 2000. The decrease in production costs was
primarily due to lower well maintenance costs, offset by increases in production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices. The increase in G&A was
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
8
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues and an increase in audit and tax fees.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2000 included expenditures related to equipment upgrades on various oil
and gas properties.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$107,338, of which $1,073 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$106,265 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $161,017, of which $1,610 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $159,407 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
9
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
----------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
December 31, 2000 and 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private
Development, L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements
of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry
Private Development, L.P. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 47,337 $ 84,843
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 91,915 49,977
----------- -----------
Total current assets 139,252 134,820
----------- -----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 3,666,171 3,660,488
Accumulated depletion (3,046,352) (3,005,158)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties 619,819 655,330
----------- -----------
$ 759,071 $ 790,150
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 12,584 $ 81,557
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 8,737 8,358
Limited partners (130 interests) 737,750 700,235
----------- -----------
746,487 708,593
----------- -----------
$ 759,071 $ 790,150
=========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 638,385 $ 345,743 $ 275,856
Interest 5,441 3,213 3,779
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- 213
--------- --------- ----------
643,826 348,956 279,848
--------- --------- ----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 235,823 177,422 184,952
General and administrative 20,910 14,767 10,935
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 90,823
Depletion 41,194 84,045 126,372
--------- --------- ----------
297,927 276,234 413,082
--------- --------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 345,899 $ 72,722 $ (133,234)
========= ========= ==========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 3,459 $ 727 $ (1,332)
========= ========= ==========
Limited partners $ 342,440 $ 71,995 $ (131,902)
========= ========= ==========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $2,634.15 $ 553.81 $(1,014.63)
========= ========= ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 11,813 $ 1,042,323 $ 1,054,136
Distributions (1,443) (142,847) (144,290)
Net loss (1,332) (131,902) (133,234)
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 9,038 767,574 776,612
Distributions (1,407) (139,334) (140,741)
Net income 727 71,995 72,722
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 8,358 700,235 708,593
Distributions (3,080) (304,925) (308,005)
Net income 3,459 342,440 345,899
----------- ----------- -----------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 8,737 $ 737,750 $ 746,487
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 345,899 $ 72,722 $(133,234)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 90,823
Depletion 41,194 84,045 126,372
Gain on disposition of assets -- -- (213)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (41,938) (22,812) 21,422
Accounts payable (68,973) 39,718 31,154
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 276,182 173,673 136,324
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (5,683) (2,042) (7,821)
Proceeds from asset dispositions -- 3,269 213
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (5,683) 1,227 (7,608)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (308,005) (140,741) (144,290)
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (37,506) 34,159 (15,574)
Cash at beginning of year 84,843 50,684 66,258
--------- --------- ---------
Cash at end of year $ 47,337 $ 84,843 $ 50,684
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 90 Spraberry Private Development, L.P. (the
"Partnership") was organized in 1990 as a general partnership under the laws of
the State of Texas and was converted to a Delaware limited partnership in 1991.
The Partnership's managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements -
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
7
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $90,823 related to its
proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
8
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $43,760 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 345,899 $ 72,722 $(133,234)
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 90,823
Depletion, depreciation and amortization for tax
reporting purposes less than amounts for
financial reporting purposes 36,539 79,135 110,651
Other, net (76,555) 39,044 36,173
--------- --------- ---------
Net income per Federal income tax returns $ 305,883 $ 190,901 $ 104,413
========= ========= =========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the net costs incurred, whether
capitalized or expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing
activities for the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ------
Development costs $ 5,683 $ 2,042 $7,821
========= ========= ======
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Proved properties:
Property acquisition costs $ 19,608 $ 19,608
Completed wells and equipment 3,646,563 3,640,880
----------- -----------
3,666,171 3,660,488
Accumulated depletion (3,046,352) (3,005,158)
----------- -----------
Net oil and gas properties $ 619,819 $ 655,330
=========== ===========
9
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $88,496 $85,512 $81,995
Reimbursement of general and administrative expenses $18,935 $11,455 $ 9,241
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 90 Spraberry Private Conv., L.P. ("EMPL") and the Partnership are
parties to the Program agreement. EMPL is a limited partnership organized for
the benefit of certain employees of Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer
USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership
--------------- -----------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
All other revenues -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs 9.090909% 90.909091%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses -
First three years 14.141414% 85.858586%
After three years 19.191919% 80.808081%
(1) Excludes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is allocated
at the Partnership level.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
10
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------ --------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 270,590 306,642
Revisions (126,717) (142,535)
Production (20,835) (24,095)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 123,038 140,012
Revisions 214,995 265,098
Production (20,688) (19,579)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 317,345 385,531
Revisions 122,969 18,001
Production (22,593) (22,121)
-------- --------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 417,721 381,411
======== ========
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.12 per barrel of NGLs and $7.64 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $2,575,000 and undiscounted was $5,966,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 12,670 $ 7,807 $ 1,314
Future production costs (6,704) (4,572) (1,058)
-------- -------- --------
5,966 3,235 256
10% annual discount factor (3,391) (1,487) (67)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 2,575 $ 1,748 $ 189
======== ======== ========
11
For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (403) $ (168) $ (91)
Net changes in prices and production costs 840 719 (692)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 844 1,623 (150)
Accretion of discount 175 19 106
Changes in production rates, timing and other (629) (634) (48)
------- ------- -------
Change in present value of future net revenues 827 1,559 (875)
------- ------- -------
Balance, beginning of year 1,748 189 1,064
------- ------- -------
Balance, end of year $ 2,575 $ 1,748 $ 189
======= ======= =======
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's
oil and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed
10% of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 56% 50% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 10% 10% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 47%
Phillips Petroleum Company 17% 14% 12%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 2% 3% 9%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing,
L.P., Phillips Petroleum Company and TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC were $29,695, $12,633
and $4,023, respectively, which are included in the caption "Accounts receivable
- oil and gas sales" in the accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the Partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Program and Partnership affairs. As
managing general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties,
all production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being
12
paid to the Partnership. Under the Partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and 1% of its operating, general and administrative
expenses. The managing general partner is also responsible for 1% of
guaranty and loan commitment fees. In return, it is allocated 1% of the
Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The partners entered into subscription
agreements for aggregate capital contributions of $5,200,000. Pioneer
USA is required to contribute amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership
capital less commission and organization and offering costs allocated to
the limited partners and to contribute amounts necessary to pay costs
and expenses allocated to it under the Partnership agreement to the
extent that its share of revenues does not cover such costs.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS
AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS
DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In September 2000, restated financial statements for 1999 and 1998 were issued
to the partners to correct a revenue allocation error for one well in the
Partnership. The 1999 and 1998 amounts contained in the following discussion of
financial condition and the results of operation are based on the restated
amounts.
Results of operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 85% to $638,385 from 2000 as
compared to $345,743 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and an increase in production. In 2000, 16,344 barrels
of oil, 6,249 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 22,121 mcf of gas were
sold, or 26,280 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 15,384 barrels of
oil, 5,304 barrels of NGLs and 19,579 mcf of gas were sold, or 23,951 BOEs. Due
to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas properties,
management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the future until
the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.13, or 71%, from
$17.04 in 1999 to $29.17 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.86, or 60%, from $9.70 in 1999 to $15.56 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 76% from $1.65 in 1999 to $2.91 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade, and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $297,927 as compared to $276,234
in 1999, an increase of $21,693, or 8%. The increase was due to increases in
production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by a
decline in depletion.
Production costs were $235,823 in 2000 and $177,422 in 1999, resulting in a
$58,401 increase, or 33%. The increase was primarily due to higher production
taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
42% from $14,767 in 1999 to $20,910 in 2000, primarily due to a higher
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues. The
Partnership paid the managing general partner $18,935 in 2000 and $11,455 in
1999 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid
directly by the Partnership. The managing general partner determines the
allocated expenses based upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative
to the non-partnership activities of the managing general partner. The method of
allocation has been consistent over the past several years with certain
modifications incorporated to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business
activities.
Depletion was $41,194 in 2000 as compared to $84,045 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $42,851, or 51%. This decrease was primarily due to a 106,156
barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher
commodity prices.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 25% to $345,743 from
$275,856 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received and an increase in production. In 1999, 15,384 barrels of oil, 5,304
barrels of NGLs and 19,579 mcf of gas were sold, or 23,951 BOEs. In 1998, 15,196
barrels of oil, 5,639 barrels of NGLs and 24,095 mcf of gas were sold, or 24,851
BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $3.98, or 30%, from
$13.06 in 1998 to $17.04 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.81, or 41%, from $6.89 in 1998 to $9.70 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 3% from $1.60 in 1998 to $1.65 in 1999.
Gain on disposition of assets of $213 recognized during 1998 was related to
equipment salvage received on a well plugged and abandoned in a prior year.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $276,234 as compared to $413,082
in 1998, a decrease of $136,848, or 33%. The decrease was due to reductions in
the impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset
by an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $177,422 in 1999 and $184,952 in 1998, resulting in a
$7,530 decrease, or 4%. The decrease was due to reductions in well maintenance
costs and ad valorem taxes.
During this period, G&A increased 35% from $10,935 in 1998 to $14,767 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $11,455 in
1999 and $9,241 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $90,823 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $84,045 in 1999 compared to $126,372 in 1998, representing a
decrease of $42,327, or 33%. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in
proved reserves of 151,444 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of higher
commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $102,509 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $294,870, offset by increases in production costs paid
of $58,401, G&A expenses paid of $6,143 and working capital of $127,817. The
increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the increase in commodity prices
during 2000 which contributed an additional $244,760 to oil and gas receipts and
an increase of $50,110 resulting from the increase in production during 2000.
The increase in production costs was primarily due to increased production taxes
associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to
higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited
to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $3,269 in 1999 were due to equipment credits
received on active wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $308,005, of which $3,080 was
distributed to the managing general partner and $304,925 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $140,741, of which
$1,407 was distributed to the managing general partner and $139,334 to the
limited partners.
PARKER & PARSLEY 90 SPRABERRY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(Restated) (Restated)
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 334,282 $ 273,886 $ 638,385 $ 345,743 $ 275,856 $ 432,783 $ 522,399
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 90,823 $ 257,009 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 203,658 $ 131,811 $ 345,899 $ 72,722 $ (133,234) $ (152,931) $ 203,213
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net
income (loss):
Managing general
partner $ 2,037 $ 1,318 $ 3,459 $ 727 $ (1,332) $ (1,529) $ 2,032
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 201,621 $ 130,493 $ 342,440 $ 71,995 $ (131,902) $ (151,402) $ 201,181
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 1,550.93 $ 1,003.79 $ 2,634.15 $ 553.81 $(1,014.63) $(1,164.63) $ 1,547.55
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 817.42 $ 1,226.21 $ 2,345.58 $ 1,071.80 $ 1,098.82 $ 1,762.53 $ 1,836.00
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $ 858,398 $ 708,194 $ 759,071 $ 790,150 $ 818,273 $1,064,821 $1,450,363
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
91-A, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 91-A, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners(a) $ 11,620
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001(a) $ 9,928
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding
Pioneer USA(a), (b) $ 4,665
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(b), (c) $ 403.05
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.66 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001(b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 220.44
-- as of December 31, 2000(c) $ 206.61
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (d) $ 378.03
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment(c), (e) $ 390.96
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment(c), (f) $ 158
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2041, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-38582-01
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2387572
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
-------------------------------------------------- ------------
Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................. 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................. 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000............................... 6
Notes to Financial Statements.......................... 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................. 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K....................... 11
Signatures............................................. 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part 1. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 525,883 $ 219,827
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 196,699 255,270
---------- ----------
Total current assets 722,582 475,097
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 9,711,990 9,710,132
Accumulated depletion (7,790,421) (7,727,573)
----------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,921,569 1,982,559
---------- ----------
$ 2,644,151 $ 2,457,656
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 56,776 $ 32,513
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 25,918 24,295
Limited partners (11,620 interests) 2,561,457 2,400,848
---------- ----------
2,587,375 2,425,143
---------- ----------
$ 2,644,151 $ 2,457,656
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 431,706 $ 453,778 $ 884,166 $ 878,201
Interest 3,524 4,289 7,054 7,652
-------- -------- -------- --------
435,230 458,067 891,220 885,853
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 152,796 160,948 313,648 308,717
General and administrative 11,109 21,632 32,165 32,098
Depletion 29,283 30,834 62,848 79,040
-------- -------- -------- --------
193,188 213,414 408,661 419,855
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 242,042 $ 244,653 $ 482,559 $ 465,998
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 2,421 $ 2,447 $ 4,826 $ 4,660
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 239,621 $ 242,206 $ 477,733 $ 461,338
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited partnership
interest $ 20.62 $ 20.84 $ 41.11 $ 39.70
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 24,295 $2,400,848 $2,425,143
Distributions (3,203) (317,124) (320,327)
Net income 4,826 477,733 482,559
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 25,918 $2,561,457 $2,587,375
========= ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
----------------------
2001 2000
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 482,559 $ 465,998
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depletion 62,848 79,040
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 58,571 (41,246)
Accounts payable 24,263 4,575
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 628,241 508,367
-------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (1,858) (18,953)
Proceeds from asset disposition - 8,812
-------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities (1,858) (10,141)
-------- --------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (320,327) (515,856)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 306,056 (17,630)
Cash at beginning of period 219,827 226,846
-------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 525,883 $ 209,216
======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of organization
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1991 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended
June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased slightly to $884,166 for the
six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $878,201 for the same period in
2000. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices received for
gas, offset by a decline in production and a decline in the average prices
received for oil and NGLs. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 19,763
7
barrels of oil, 5,186 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 52,227 mcf of
gas were sold, or 33,654 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months
ended June 30, 2000, 22,483 barrels of oil, 10,398 barrels of NGLs and 47,283
mcf of gas were sold, or 40,762 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.43, or 2%, from $27.85
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.42 for the same period ended June
30, 2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $1.85, or 13%,
from $13.94 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $12.09 for the same
period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 136% from
$2.27 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $5.35 for the same period in
2001. The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past
decade and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $408,661 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $419,855 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $11,194,
or 3%. This decrease was due to a decline in depletion, offset by increases in
production costs and general and administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $313,648 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$308,717 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $4,931 increase, or 2%. This
increase is primarily due to additional well maintenance costs incurred to
stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A increased
slightly from $32,098 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $32,165 for the
same period in 2001, primarily due to an increase in audit and tax fees.
Depletion was $62,848 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$79,040 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $16,192 or 20%. This decrease
was primarily due to a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from
charges taken in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long- Lived
Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121") during the fourth quarter of 2000 and a
decline in oil production of 2,720 barrels for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 5% to $431,706 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $453,778 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and lower
average prices received for oil and NGLs, offset by higher average prices
received for gas. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 9,218 barrels of
8
oil, 2,611 barrels of NGLs and 33,176 mcf of gas were sold, or 17,358 BOEs. For
the three months ended June 30, 2000, 11,123 barrels of oil, 5,559 barrels of
NGLs and 24,304 mcf of gas were sold, or 20,733 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $1.06, or 4%, from $27.82
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.76 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per barrel of NGLs decreased $4.84, or 34%,
from $14.20 during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $9.36 for the same
period in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 80% from
$2.69 for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.84 for the same period in
2001.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $193,188 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $213,414 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$20,226, or 9%. This decrease was due to declines in G&A, production costs and
depletion.
Production costs were $152,796 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$160,948 for the same period in 2000 resulting in an $8,152 decrease, or 5%.
This decrease was primarily due to lower well maintenance costs.
During this period, G&A decreased 49% from $21,632 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $11,109 for the same period in 2001, primarily due to a lower
percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3%
of oil and gas revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues and a
decrease in audit, tax and monitoring fees.
Depletion was $29,283 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$30,834 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $1,551, or 5%. This decrease
was due to a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis from charges
taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 2000 and a
decline in oil production of 1,905 barrels for the three months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $119,874 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was the result of a reduction in working capital of $119,505 and an
increase of $5,367 in oil and gas sales receipts, offset by increases in
production costs of $4,931 and G&A costs of $67. The increase in oil and gas
receipts resulted from the increase in gas prices of $146,081 during 2001,
offset by a decline of $111,110 in production and a $29,604 decline resulting
from lower oil and NGL prices as compared to the same period in 2000. The
increase in production costs was primarily due to higher well maintenance costs
incurred to stimulate well production. The increase in G&A was primarily due to
an increase in audit and tax fees.
9
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 were related to expenditures for oil and gas equipment
upgrades on active properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $8,812 were received during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 on a temporarily abandoned well.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$320,327, of which $3,203 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$317,124 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $515,856, of which $5,159 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $510,697 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
10
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 6, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
----------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-38582-01
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2387572
------------------------------- --------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code: (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section
12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
-----------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$11,575,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 11,620.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1991 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 11,620 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 38% and 16% were attributable to sales
made to Plains Marketing, L.P. and TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC, respectively. Pioneer
USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not have an
adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and
gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 48
oil and gas wells. One well has been plugged and abandoned. At December 31,
2000, the Partnership had 47 wells producing.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"
below. Such reserves have been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants,
Inc., an independent petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 11,620 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 724 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations are distributed to the partners
at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership agreement. During
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, distributions of $1,162,365 and
$432,629, respectively, were made to the limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------------- ------------- ------------ ------------- -------------
Operating results:
-----------------
Oil and gas sales $ 1,899,948 $ 1,140,335 $ 955,645 $ 1,411,247 $ 1,629,975
============ ============ =========== ============ ============
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ 12,824 $ 66,898 $ 306,043 $ 485,158 $ -
============ ============ =========== ============ ============
Net income (loss) $ 1,115,704 $ 266,803 $ (280,631) $ (7,029) $ 654,054
============ ============ =========== ============ ============
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 11,157 $ 2,668 $ (2,806) $ (70) $ 6,540
============ ============ =========== ============ ============
Limited partners $ 1,104,547 $ 264,135 $ (277,825) $ (6,959) $ 647,514
============ ============ =========== ============ ============
Limited partners' net income
(loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 95.06 $ 22.73 $ (23.91) $ (.60) $ 55.72
============ ============ =========== ============ ============
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 100.03 $ 37.23 $ 36.77 $ 75.11 $ 70.97
============ ============ =========== ============ ============
At year end:
-----------
Identifiable assets $ 2,457,656 $ 2,531,606 $ 2,667,803 $ 3,402,546 $ 4,289,878
============ ============ =========== ============ ============
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 67% to $1,899,948 for 2000 as
compared to $1,140,335 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received, offset by a decline in production. In 2000, 43,704
barrels of oil, 20,425 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 94,315 mcf of
gas were sold, or 79,848 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 44,203
barrels of oil, 20,617 barrels of NGLs and 100,615 mcf of gas were sold, or
81,589 BOEs. Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties, management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the
future until the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully
depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.33, or 70%, from
$17.57 in 1999 to $29.90 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $5.60, or 60%, from $9.34 in 1999 to $14.94 in 2000. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 80% from $1.70 in 1999 to $3.06 in 2000. The
market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade and
management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the foreseeable
future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas production at
average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
A gain on disposition of assets of $1,096 recognized during 1999 was from
equipment credits received on one temporarily abandoned property.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 2000 to $802,130 as compared to $884,937
in 1999, a decrease of $82,807, or 9%. The decrease was due to declines in
depletion, the impairment of oil and gas properties and general and
administrative expenses ("G&A"), offset by an increase in production costs.
Production costs were $589,344 in 2000 and $514,994 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $74,350, or 14%. This increase was primarily due to higher
production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well
maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
21% from $75,454 in 1999 to $59,962 in 2000. The Partnership paid the managing
general partner $41,213 in 2000 and $34,110 in 1999 for G&A incurred on behalf
of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by the Partnership. The
managing general partner determines the allocated expenses based upon the level
of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities of the
managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent over the
past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect changes in
Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized
non-cash charges of $12,824 and $66,898 related to its oil and gas properties
during 2000 and 1999, respectively.
5
Depletion decreased in 2000 to $140,000 as compared to $227,591 in 1999,
representing a decrease of $87,591, or 38%. This decrease was primarily due to a
127,977 barrels of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of
higher commodity prices and a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable
basis from charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter
of 1999.
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 19% to $1,140,335 from
$955,645 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 44,203 barrels of oil,
20,617 barrels of NGLs and 100,615 mcf of gas were sold, or 81,589 BOEs. In
1998, 49,403 barrels of oil, 21,220 barrels of NGLs and 108,617 mcf of gas were
sold, or 88,726 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $4.42, or 34%, from
$13.15 in 1998 to $17.57 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $2.90, or 45%, from $6.44 in 1998 to $9.34 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 9% from $1.56 in 1998 to $1.70 in 1999.
A gain on disposition of assets of $1,096 recognized during 1999 was from
equipment credits received on one temporarily abandoned property.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $884,937 as compared to $1,247,302
in 1998, a decrease of $362,365, or 29%. The decrease was due to declines in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset by
an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $514,994 in 1999 and $535,948 in 1998, resulting in a
decrease of $20,954, or 4%. This decrease resulted from declines in ad valorem
taxes, well maintenance costs and workover costs, offset by an increase in
production taxes due to increased oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 72% from $43,977 in 1998 to $75,454 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $34,110 in
1999 and $24,415 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
The Partnership recognized non-cash SFAS 121 charges of $66,898 and $306,043
related to its oil and gas properties during 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Depletion decreased in 1999 to $227,591 as compared to $361,334 in 1998. This
represented a decrease of $133,743, or 37%. This decrease was the result of an
increase in proved reserves of 281,767 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of
higher commodity prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis
from charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of 1998
and a decline in oil production of 5,200 barrels for the period ended December
31, 1999 compared to the same period in 1998.
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998,
6
weather patterns, regional economic recessions and political matters combined to
cause worldwide oil supplies to exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline
in oil prices. Also during 1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for
natural gas declined. During 1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and certain other crude oil exporting nations
announced reductions in their planned export volumes. Those announcements,
together with the enactment of the announced reductions in export volumes, had a
positive impact on world oil prices, as have overall natural gas supply and
demand fundamentals on North American natural gas prices. Although the favorable
commodity price environment and stable field service cost environment is
expected to continue during 2001, there is no assurance that commodity prices
will not return to a less favorable level or that field service costs will not
escalate in the future, both of which could negatively impact the Partnership's
future results of operations and cash distributions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $647,967 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $767,190 and a decline in G&A expenses paid of
$15,492, offset by an increase in production costs paid of $74,350 and working
capital of $60,365. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the
increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an additional
$804,227 to oil and gas receipts, offset by $37,037 resulting from the decline
in production during 2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to
increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and
additional well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities during 2000 and 1999 included
expenditures related to equipment upgrades on various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $11,549 and $1,096 recognized during 2000
and 1999, respectively, were from the disposition of oil and gas equipment on
active wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $1,174,106, of which $11,741
was distributed to the managing general partner and $1,162,365 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $436,999, of which
$4,370 was distributed to the managing general partner and $432,629 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.:
Independent Auditors' Report............................................. 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999.......................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998.................................................... 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998....................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998.................................................... 13
Notes to Financial Statements............................................ 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
-------------- -------------
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash $ 219,827 $ 226,846
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 255,270 177,988
------------- ------------
Total current assets 475,097 404,834
------------- ------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 9,710,132 9,701,521
Accumulated depletion (7,727,573) (7,574,749)
------------- ------------
Net oil and gas properties 1,982,559 2,126,772
------------- ------------
$ 2,457,656 $ 2,531,606
============= ============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
---------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 32,513 $ 48,061
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 24,295 24,879
Limited partners (11,620 interests) 2,400,848 2,458,666
------------- ------------
2,425,143 2,483,545
------------- ------------
$ 2,457,656 $ 2,531,606
============= ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------ -------------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 1,899,948 $ 1,140,335 $ 955,645
Interest 17,886 10,309 11,026
Gain on disposition of assets - 1,096 -
------------ ----------- ------------
1,917,834 1,151,740 966,671
------------ ----------- ------------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 589,344 514,994 535,948
General and administrative 59,962 75,454 43,977
Impairment of oil and gas properties 12,824 66,898 306,043
Depletion 140,000 227,591 361,334
------------ ----------- ------------
802,130 884,937 1,247,302
------------ ----------- ------------
Net income (loss) $ 1,115,704 $ 266,803 $ (280,631)
============ =========== ============
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 11,157 $ 2,668 $ (2,806)
============ =========== ============
Limited partners $ 1,104,547 $ 264,135 $ (277,825)
============ =========== ============
Net income (loss) per limited partners' interest $ 95.06 $ 22.73 $ (23.91)
============ =========== ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
----------- ----------- ------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 33,702 $ 3,332,223 $ 3,365,925
Distributions (4,315) (427,238) (431,553)
Net loss (2,806) (277,825) (280,631)
----------- ----------- ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 26,581 2,627,160 2,653,741
Distributions (4,370) (432,629) (436,999)
Net income 2,668 264,135 266,803
----------- ----------- ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 24,879 2,458,666 2,483,545
Distributions (11,741) (1,162,365) (1,174,106)
Net income 11,157 1,104,547 1,115,704
----------- ----------- ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 24,295 $ 2,400,848 $ 2,425,143
=========== =========== ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash flows from operations:
Net income (loss) $ 1,115,704 $ 266,803 $ (280,631)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties 12,824 66,898 306,043
Depletion 140,000 227,591 361,334
Gain on disposition of assets - (1,096) -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (77,282) (66,464) 54,318
Accounts payable (15,548) 33,999 (22,559)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating
activities 1,175,698 527,731 418,505
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (20,160) (23,360) (15,294)
Proceeds from asset disposition 11,549 1,096 5,617
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities (8,611) (22,264) (9,677)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (1,174,106) (436,999) (431,553)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (7,019) 68,468 (22,725)
Cash at beginning of year 226,846 158,378 181,103
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash at end of year $ 219,827 $ 226,846 $ 158,378
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1991 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in
Texas and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the unit-of-
production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil (dominant
mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants. The
carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses
are allocated, in part, to the Partnership by the managing general partner.
Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based upon the
level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities
of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent
over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect
changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized non-cash impairment provisions of $12,824, $66,898 and
$306,043 related to its proved oil and gas properties during 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively.
15
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $946,627 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income per Federal income tax returns for the years
ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- ------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 1,115,704 $ 266,803 $ (280,631)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes (greater than) less than
amounts for financial reporting purposes 120,160 106,971 (11,376)
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes 12,824 66,898 306,043
Other, net 8,901 (4,139) 8,462
------------ ------------ -----------
Net income per Federal income tax
returns $ 1,257,589 $ 436,533 $ 22,498
============ ============ ===========
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the costs incurred, whether capitalized or
expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- ------------
Development costs $ 20,160 $ 23,360 $ 15,294
============ ============ ===========
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
-------------- -------------
Property acquisition costs $ 343,666 $ 343,666
Completed wells and equipment 9,366,466 9,357,855
------------- ------------
9,710,132 9,701,521
Accumulated depletion (7,727,573) (7,574,749)
------------- ------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,982,559 $ 2,126,772
============= ============
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 202,739 $ 213,969 $ 210,197
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 41,213 $ 34,110 $ 24,415
16
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 91-A GP ("EMPL") and the Partnership are parties to the Program
agreement. EMPL is a general partnership organized for the benefit of certain
employees of Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership (1)
--------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and depletable
properties 34.3434343% 65.6565657%
All other revenues 34.3434343% 65.6565657%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion costs
and all other costs 24.2424242% 75.7575758%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses 34.3434343% 65.6565657%
(1) Includes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 45 limited partner interests
owned by Pioneer USA.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
------------- ------------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 909,941 1,063,660
Revisions (333,709) (228,660)
Production (70,623) (108,617)
------------- ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 505,609 726,383
Revisions 430,559 692,465
Production (64,820) (100,615)
------------- ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 871,348 1,318,233
Revisions 171,624 199,837
Production (64,129) (94,315)
------------- ------------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 978,843 1,423,755
============= ============
17
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.72
per barrel of oil, $12.21 per barrel of NGLs and $7.85 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $8,217,000 and undiscounted was $17,966,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider probable reserves, anticipated
future oil and gas prices, interest rates, changes in development and production
costs and risks associated with future production. Because of these and other
considerations, any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and
imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 32,836 $ 21,453 $ 5,509
Future production costs (14,870) (11,854) (4,104)
------------ ------------ ------------
17,966 9,599 1,405
10% annual discount factor (9,749) (4,661) (456)
------------ ------------ ------------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 8,217 $ 4,938 $ 949
============ ============ ============
18
For the years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (1,311) $ (625) $ (420)
Net changes in prices and production costs 3,414 2,743 (2,438)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 1,558 3,245 (441)
Accretion of discount 494 95 391
Changes in production rates, timing and other (876) (1,469) (48)
------------ ------------ ------------
Change in present value of future net revenues 3,279 3,989 (2,956)
------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, beginning of year 4,938 949 3,905
------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, end of year $ 8,217 $ 4,938 $ 949
============ ============ ============
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership`s oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Plains Marketing, L.P. 38% 36% -
TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC 16% 17% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 52%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 3% 5% 19%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Plains Marketing, L.P.
and TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC were $64,973 and $19,274, respectively, which are
included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the
accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing
general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all
production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a portion of the oil and
gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA prior to being paid to
the Partnership. Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing
general partner pays 1%
19
of the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs, and 1%
of its operating and general and administrative expenses. In return it
is allocated 1% of the Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$11,620,000. The managing general partner is required to contribute
amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership capital less sales
commission costs allocated to the limited partners and to contribute
amounts necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the
partnership agreement to the extent its share of revenues does not
cover such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by the managing general partner. The Partnership
participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax partnership (the
"Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program agreement,
Pioneer USA pays approximately 25% of the Program's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and approximately 35% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, they are allocated approximately 35% of the
Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers or
employees of Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and
administrative expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 45 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
23
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 202,739 $ 213,969 $ 210,197
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 41,213 $ 34,110 $ 24,415
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation in oil and gas activities of the
Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes
thereto, or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
Dated: March 26, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 26, 2001
-------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 26, 2001
------------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 26, 2001
------------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 26, 2001
------------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 26, 2001
------------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 26, 2001
------------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to Item
14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership -
of Parker & Parsley 91-A, L.P. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit A of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-38582) (hereinafter
called the Partnership's Registration Statement)
4(b) Form of Limited Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit C of the
Partnership's Registration Statement
4(b) Form of General Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit D of the
Partnership's Registration Statement
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to -
Exhibit B of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3
of Amendment No. 2 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement
10(b) Development Drilling Program Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit B of the
Partnership's Registration Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-A, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 884,166 $ 878,201 $1,899,948 $1,140,335 $ 955,645 $1,411,247 $1,629,975
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ 12,824 $ 66,898 $ 306,043 $ 485,158 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 482,559 $ 465,998 $1,115,704 $ 266,803 $ (280,631) $ (7,029) $ 654,054
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 4,826 $ 4,660 $ 11,157 $ 2,668 $ (2,806) $ (70) $ 6,540
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 477,733 $ 461,338 $1,104,547 $ 264,135 $ (277,825) $ (6,959) $ 647,514
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per
limited partnership
interest $ 41.11 $ 39.70 $ 95.06 $ 22.73 $ (23.91) $ (.60) $ 55.72
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 27.29 $ 43.95 $ 100.03 $ 37.23 $ 36.77 $ 75.11 $ 70.97
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $2,644,151 $2,486,323 $2,457,656 $2,531,606 $2,667,803 $3,402,546 $4,289,878
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.
5205 NORTH O'CONNOR BLVD., SUITE 1400
IRVING, TEXAS 75039
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
OF
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TO
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS OCTOBER 12, 2001
----------
This document contains important information specific to Parker & Parsley
91-B, L.P., and supplements the proxy statement/prospectus dated October 12,
2001, of Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA,
Inc., by which Pioneer USA is soliciting proxies to be voted at a special
meeting of limited partners of the partnership. The purpose of the special
meeting is for you to vote upon the merger of the partnership with and into
Pioneer USA that, if completed, will result in your receiving common stock of
Pioneer Natural Resources Company for your partnership interests.
This document contains the following information concerning Parker &
Parsley 91-B, L.P.:
o A table containing:
-- the aggregate initial investment by the limited partners
-- the aggregate historical limited partner distributions through
July 31, 2001
-- the merger value attributable to partnership interests of limited
partners, excluding Pioneer USA
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the merger value per $1,000 limited partner investment as a
multiple of distributions for the past four quarterly
distributions including the distribution in July 2001
-- the book value per $1,000 limited partner investment as of June
30, 2001 and as of December 31, 2000
-- the going concern value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the liquidation value per $1,000 limited partner investment
-- the ordinary tax loss per $1,000 limited partner investment in
year of initial investment
o Information about:
-- the legal opinion for the limited partners
-- the term of the partnership
o The partnership's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2001
o The partnership's annual report on Form 10-K, including management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, for the year ended December 31, 2000
o Selected historical financial data for the partnership for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the five years ended December
31, 2000
-1-
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TABLE
Aggregate Initial Investment by the Limited Partners (a) $ 11,249
Aggregate Historical Limited Partner Distributions through July 31, 2001 (a) $ 8,297
Merger Value Attributable to Partnership Interests of Limited Partners, Excluding Pioneer $ 5,003
USA (a), (b)
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (b), (c) $ 445.11
Merger Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment as a Multiple of Distributions for the 3.73 times
past four quarterly distributions including the distribution in July 2001 (b), (c)
Book Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment:
-- as of June 30, 2001 (c) $ 170.62
-- as of December 31, 2000 (c) $ 160.69
Going Concern Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (d) $ 417.84
Liquidation Value per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment (c), (e) $ 431.87
Ordinary Tax Loss per $1,000 Limited Partner Investment in Year of Initial Investment $ 142
(c), (f)
----------
(a) Stated in thousands.
(b) The merger value for the partnership is equal to the sum of the present
value of estimated future net revenues from the partnership's estimated oil
and gas reserves and its net working capital, in each case as of March 31,
2001, less its pro rata share, based on its reserve value, of the estimated
expenses and fees of the mergers of all of the partnerships and less the
cash distribution on July 13, 2001, by the partnership to its partners.
(c) Interests in some partnerships were sold in units at prices other than
$1,000. We have presented this information based on a $1,000 initial
investment for ease of use and comparison among partnerships. You should
not assume that the amount shown per $1,000 investment is the same as the
value or amount attributable to a single unit investment.
(d) The going concern value for the partnership is based upon: (1) the sum of
(A) the estimated net cash flow from the sale of the partnership's reserves
during a 10-year operating period and (B) the estimated residual value from
the sale of the partnership's remaining reserves at the end of the
operating period, in each case using the same pricing and discount rate as
in the merger value calculation, less (2)(A) partnership level general and
administrative expenses, and (B) the cash distribution on July 13, 2001 by
the partnership to its partners.
(e) The liquidation value for the partnership is based upon the sale of the
partnership's reserves at the reserve value, less (1) liquidation expenses
which are estimated to be the sum of (A) the partnership's pro rata share
of the merger expenses and fees described in footnote (b) above and (B) 3%
of the partnership's reserve value, and (2) the cash distribution on July
13, 2001 by the partnership to its partners. The liquidation expenses
represent estimated costs to retain an investment banker or broker to sell
the assets of the partnership and the legal and other closing costs
associated with such transaction, including the wind-down costs of the
partnership.
(f) Your ability to use your distributive share of the partnership's loss to
offset your other income may have been subject to certain limitations at
your level as a partner, and you may therefore wish to consult your tax
advisor to determine the additional value, if any, actually realized by you
in your particular circumstances.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL OPINION FOR THE LIMITED PARTNERS
The partnership agreement for the partnership requires that special legal
counsel render an opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA that
neither the grant nor the exercise of the right to approve the merger of the
partnership by its limited partners will adversely affect the federal income tax
classification of the partnership or any of its limited partners. Although not
required by the partnership agreement, the opinion will also state that neither
the grant nor exercise of such right will result in the loss of any limited
partner's limited liability. In addition, the counsel designated to render the
opinion is not required to be counsel other than counsel to Pioneer USA or the
partnership. Both the designated counsel and the legal opinion must be approved
by the limited partners. Pioneer USA has retained Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of Wilmington, Delaware, for the purpose of rendering this legal
opinion on behalf of the limited partners to Pioneer USA. The merger proposals
include an approval of that counsel and the form of its opinion. A copy of the
opinion is attached as an exhibit to the merger proposals.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TERM OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The term of the partnership is until December 31, 2041, unless the
partnership is earlier terminated in accordance with the applicable provisions
of its partnership agreement.
-2-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission File No. 33-38582-02
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-2397335
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 1400, Irving, Texas 75039
------------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes / x / No / /
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000..................................... 3
Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.................... 4
Statement of Partners' Capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2001.................................... 5
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................. 6
Notes to Financial Statements............................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.................... 7
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................... 11
Signatures............................................... 12
2
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Part 1. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
ASSETS (Unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash $ 484,839 $ 185,644
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 167,632 281,416
---------- ----------
Total current assets 652,471 467,060
---------- ----------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 9,764,161 9,761,207
Accumulated depletion (8,439,325) (8,398,807)
---------- ----------
Net oil and gas properties 1,324,836 1,362,400
---------- ----------
$ 1,977,307 $ 1,829,460
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 41,661 $ 6,714
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 16,324 15,195
Limited partners (11,249 interests) 1,919,322 1,807,551
---------- ----------
1,935,646 1,822,746
---------- ----------
$ 1,977,307 $ 1,829,460
========== ==========
The financial information included as of June 30, 2001 has been prepared by
the managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 350,850 $ 500,753 $ 732,727 $ 954,341
Interest 3,524 4,261 6,842 7,470
Gain on disposition of assets - 2,273 - 2,273
-------- -------- -------- --------
354,374 507,287 739,569 964,084
-------- -------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 152,544 134,063 277,327 280,019
General and administrative 8,966 26,259 26,948 37,463
Depletion 18,734 20,045 40,518 42,010
-------- -------- -------- --------
180,244 180,367 344,793 359,492
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 174,130 $ 326,920 $ 394,776 $ 604,592
======== ======== ======== ========
Allocation of net income:
Managing general partner $ 1,742 $ 3,269 $ 3,948 $ 6,046
======== ======== ======== ========
Limited partners $ 172,388 $ 323,651 $ 390,828 $ 598,546
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per limited partnership
interest $ 15.32 $ 28.77 $ 34.74 $ 53.21
======== ======== ======== ========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
--------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 15,195 $1,807,551 $1,822,746
Distributions (2,819) (279,057) (281,876)
Net income 3,948 390,828 394,776
-------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 $ 16,324 $1,919,322 $1,935,646
======== ========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30,
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 394,776 $ 604,592
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depletion 40,518 42,010
Gain on disposition of assets - (2,273)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 113,784 (61,382)
Accounts payable 34,947 13,131
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 584,025 596,078
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (3,087) (6,482)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 133 2,273
--------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities (2,954) (4,209)
--------- ---------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (281,876) (554,017)
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash 299,195 37,852
Cash at beginning of period 185,644 213,165
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 484,839 $ 251,017
========= =========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by the
managing general partner without audit by independent public accountants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2001
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and nature of operations
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1991 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas and
is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
Note 2. Basis of presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2001 and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001 and 2000 include all adjustments and accruals consisting only of normal
recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim period. These interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications may have been
made to the June 30, 2000 financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2001
financial statement presentations.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes
thereto contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, a copy
of which is available upon request by writing to Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer, 5205 North O'Connor Boulevard, Suite 1400, Irving,
Texas 75039-3746.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (1)
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared with six months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 23% to $732,727 for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $954,341 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and a decline in
the average price received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
gas and NGLs. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, 17,901 barrels of oil,
7
6,251 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 28,144 mcf of gas were sold,
or 28,843 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). For the six months ended June 30,
2000, 24,467 barrels of oil, 11,016 barrels of NGLs and 42,828 mcf of gas were
sold, or 42,621 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $.65, or 2%, from $28.58
for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $27.93 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $1.23, or 8%, from
$14.84 during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $16.07 for the same period
in 2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 120% from $2.14
during the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $4.70 for the same period in 2001.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $2,273 was recognized during the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $344,793 for the six months ended June 30,
2001 as compared to $359,492 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $14,699,
or 4%. This decrease was due to declines in general and administrative expenses
("G&A"), production costs and depletion.
Production costs were $277,327 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and
$280,019 for the same period in 2000 resulting in a $2,692 decrease, or 1%. This
decrease was primarily the result of a decline in workover costs, offset by an
increase in well maintenance costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
28% from $37,463 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $26,948 for the same
period in 2001. The decline was primarily due to a lower percentage of the
managing general partner's G&A being allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas
revenues) as a result of decreased oil and gas revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Depletion was $40,518 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$42,010 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $1,492, or 4%. This decrease
was primarily due to a decline in oil production of 6,566 barrels for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Three months ended June 30, 2001 compared with three months ended June 30, 2000
Revenues:
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues decreased 30% to $350,850 for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $500,753 for the same period in 2000.
The decrease in revenues resulted from a decrease in production and a decline in
8
the average price received for oil, offset by higher average prices received for
gas and NGLs. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, 8,311 barrels of oil,
4,242 barrels of NGLs and 17,521 mcf of gas were sold, or 15,473 BOEs. For the
three months ended June 30, 2000, 12,405 barrels of oil, 6,040 barrels of NGLs
and 23,026 mcf of gas were sold, or 22,283 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil decreased $1.72, or 6%, from $28.62
for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $26.90 for the same period in 2001.
The average price received per barrel of NGLs increased $.32, or 2%, from $14.61
during the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $14.93 for the same period in
2001. The average price received per mcf of gas increased 46% from $2.50 during
the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $3.65 in 2001.
Gain on disposition of assets of $2,273 was recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2000 from equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Costs and Expenses:
Total costs and expenses decreased to $180,244 for the three months ended June
30, 2001 as compared to $180,367 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of
$123. This decrease was due to declines in G&A and depletion, offset by an
increase in production costs.
Production costs were $152,544 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and
$134,063 for the same period in 2000 resulting in an $18,481 increase, or 14%.
This increase was primarily due to additional well maintenance and workover
costs incurred to stimulate well production.
During this period, G&A decreased 66% from $26,259 for the three months ended
June 30, 2000 to $8,966 for the same period in 2001. The decline was due to less
G&A being allocated due to lower oil and gas revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000 and declines in audit, tax
and monitoring fees.
Depletion was $18,734 for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to
$20,045 for the same period in 2000, a decrease of $1,311, or 7%. This decrease
was primarily due to a decrease in oil production of 4,094 barrels for the three
months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $12,053 during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 from the same period ended June 30, 2000. This
decrease was due to a decline in oil and gas sales receipts of $222,242, offset
by declines in production costs of $2,692, G&A expenses paid of $10,515 and
working capital of $196,982. The decrease in oil and gas receipts resulted from
a decline of $328,981 in production during 2001 as compared to the same period
in 2000 and a decline in oil prices of $16,400, offset by an increase in gas and
9
NGL prices of $123,139 during 2001. The decrease in production costs was
primarily due to lower workover costs, offset by an increase in well maintenance
costs incurred to stimulate well production. The decrease in G&A was primarily
due to lower G&A being allocated due to decreased oil and gas revenues.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2001
and 2000 were related to the upgrades of oil and gas equipment on active
properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $133 and $2,273 incurred during the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, were related to equipment
credits on active wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash distributions to the partners were
$281,876, of which $2,819 was distributed to the managing general partner and
$279,057 to the limited partners. For the same period ended June 30, 2000, cash
distributions to the partners were $554,017, of which $5,540 was distributed to
the managing general partner and $548,477 to the limited partners.
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, no distributions were made by the
partnership to its partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2001 the cash distribution
that otherwise would have been mailed to partners in late June was made to
holders of record as of July 9, 2001 and was mailed on July 13, 2001. For
further information, see "Proposal to acquire partnerships" below.
Proposal to acquire partnerships
On June 29, 2001, Pioneer Natural Resources Company ("Pioneer") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-4 Registration
Statement (File No. 333- 59094) (the "preliminary proxy statement/prospectus"),
which proposes an agreement and plan of merger among Pioneer, Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer, and
46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships. Each partnership that approves the
agreement and plan of merger and the other related merger proposals will merge
with and into Pioneer USA upon the closing of the transactions described in the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, and the partnership interests of each
such partnership will be converted into the right to receive Pioneer common
stock. The Partnership is one of the 46 Parker & Parsley limited partnerships
that will be asked to approve the agreement and plan of merger. The preliminary
proxy statement/prospectus is non-binding and is subject to, among other things,
consideration of offers from third parties to purchase any partnership or its
assets and the majority approval of the limited partnership interests in each
partnership.
Pioneer USA will solicit proxies from limited partners to approve the mergers
only when the proxy statement/prospectus is final and declared effective. No
solicitation will be made using preliminary materials. Nonetheless, copies of
the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus may be obtained without charge upon
request from Pioneer Natural Resources Company, 5205 North O'Connor Blvd., Suite
1400, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Investor Relations.
10
The limited partners are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus of Pioneer
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, when it is finalized, because
it contains important information about the proposed mergers, including
information about the direct and indirect interests of Pioneer USA and Pioneer
in the mergers. The limited partners may also obtain the preliminary and (when
filed) final proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents relating to
the proposed mergers free through the internet web site that the Securities and
Exchange Commission maintains at www.sec.gov.
---------------
(1) "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
actual events and results will not be materially different than the
anticipated results described in the forward looking statements.
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits - none
(b) Reports on Form 8-K - none
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.,
Managing General Partner
Dated: August 8, 2001 By: /s/ Rich Dealy
------------------------------------
Rich Dealy, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
12
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-38582-02
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-2397335
-------------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1400 WILLIAMS SQUARE WEST, 5205 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., IRVING, TEXAS 75039
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code : (972) 444-9001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS ($1,000 PER UNIT)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / X /
No market currently exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant. Based on the original purchase price, the aggregate market value of
limited partnership interests owned by non-affiliates of the Registrant is
$11,239,000.
As of March 8, 2001, the number of outstanding limited partnership
interests was 11,249.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the indicated parts
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: None
PARTS I AND II OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") CONTAIN FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. ACCORDINGLY, NO
ASSURANCES CAN BE GIVEN THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS WILL NOT BE
MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE "ITEM 1. BUSINESS" FOR A DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FACTORS
THAT COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE
ANTICIPATED RESULTS DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1991 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
Pioneer USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Natural Resources Company
("Pioneer"). As of March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 11,249 limited partnership
interests outstanding.
The Partnership does not have any employees of its own. Pioneer USA employs 701
persons, many of whom dedicated a part of their time to the conduct of the
Partnership's business during the period for which this Report is filed. Pioneer
USA is responsible for all management functions.
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production and is not
involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas. The Partnership's
production is geographically concentrated in West Texas.
The principal markets during 2000 for the oil produced by the Partnership were
refineries and oil transmission companies that have facilities near the
Partnership's oil producing properties. During 2000, Pioneer USA marketed the
Partnership's gas to a variety of purchasers, none of which accounted for 10% or
more of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues. Of the Partnership's total oil
and gas revenues for 2000, approximately 48% and 22% were attributable to sales
made to Mobil Oil Corporation and Plains Marketing, L.P., respectively. Pioneer
USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would not have an
adverse effect on its ability to sell its oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and
gas production.
The Partnership's revenues, profitability, cash flow and future rate of growth
are highly dependent on the prevailing prices of oil and gas, which are affected
by numerous factors beyond the Partnership's control. Oil and gas prices
historically have been very volatile. A substantial or extended decline in the
prices of oil or gas could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's
revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances,
result in a reduction in the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and gas
properties.
Oil and gas production operations are subject to various types of regulations by
local, state and federal agencies. The Partnership's operations are also subject
to state conservation laws and regulations, including the establishment of
maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging
and abandonment of wells. Each state generally imposes a production or severance
tax with respect to production and sale of oil and gas within their respective
jurisdictions. Noncompliance with the laws and regulations may subject the
Partnership to penalties, damages or other liabilities and compliance may
increase the cost of the Partnership's operations.
The oil and gas business is also subject to environmental hazards such as oil
spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that
could expose the Partnership to substantial
2
liability due to pollution and other environmental damages. Although the
Partnership believes that its business operations do not impair environmental
quality and that its costs of complying with any applicable environmental
regulations are not currently significant, the Partnership cannot predict what,
if any, effect these environmental regulations may have on its current or future
operations.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves and
future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves.
No material part of the Partnership's business is seasonal and the Partnership
conducts no foreign operations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership's properties consist of leasehold interests in properties on
which oil and gas wells are located. Such property interests are often subject
to landowner royalties, overriding royalties and other oil and gas leasehold
interests.
Fractional working interests in developmental oil and gas prospects located
primarily in the Spraberry Trend Area of West Texas were acquired by the
Partnership, resulting in the Partnership's participation in the drilling of 29
oil and gas wells. At December 31, 2000, the Partnership had 29 producing oil
and gas wells.
For information relating to the Partnership's estimated proved oil and gas
reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, see Note 7 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"
below. Such reserves have been evaluated by Williamson Petroleum Consultants,
Inc., an independent petroleum consultant.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership from time to time is a party to various legal proceedings
incidental to its business involving claims in oil and gas leases or interests,
other claims for damages in amounts not in excess of 10% of its current assets
and other matters, none of which Pioneer USA believes to be material to the
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the partners during the fourth
quarter of 2000.
3
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DISTRIBUTIONS
At March 8, 2001, the Partnership had 11,249 outstanding limited partnership
interests held of record by 677 subscribers. There is no established public
trading market for the limited partnership interests. Under the limited
partnership agreement, Pioneer USA has made certain commitments to purchase
partnership interests at a computed value.
Revenues which, in the sole judgement of the managing general partner, are not
required to meet the Partnership's obligations will be distributed to the
partners at least quarterly in accordance with the limited partnership
agreement. During the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, $1,324,583 and
$481,274, respectively, of such revenue-related distributions were made to the
limited partners.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended
December 31:
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- ----------
Operating results:
-------------------
Oil and gas sales $ 2,046,224 $ 1,136,073 $ 873,012 $ 1,273,373 $1,632,595
============== ============= ============== ============== ==========
Impairment of oil and gas
properties $ -- $ -- $ 295,542 $ 323,078 $ --
============== ============= ============== ============== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 1,354,094 $ 490,669 $ (177,905) $ 222,730 $ 924,002
============== ============= ============== ============== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general partner $ 13,541 $ 4,907 $ (1,779) $ 2,227 $ 9,240
============== ============= ============== ============== ==========
Limited partners $ 1,340,553 $ 485,762 $ (176,126) $ 220,503 $ 914,762
============== ============= ============== ============== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 119.17 $ 43.18 $ (15.66) $ 19.60 $ 81.32
============== ============= ============== ============== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 117.75 $ 42.78 $ 36.76 $ 75.32 $ 84.40
============== ============= ============== ============== ==========
At year end:
-------------
Identifiable assets $ 1,829,460 $ 1,843,803 $ 1,820,336 $ 2,424,808 $3,051,464
============== ============= ============== ============== ==========
4
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
2000 compared to 1999
The Partnership's oil and gas revenues increased 80% to $2,046,224 for 2000 as
compared to $1,136,073 in 1999. The increase in revenues resulted from higher
average prices received and an increase in production. In 2000, 47,684 barrels
of oil, 21,866 barrels of natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and 85,556 mcf of gas
were sold, or 83,809 barrel of oil equivalents ("BOEs"). In 1999, 46,030 barrels
of oil, 19,026 barrels of NGLs and 74,025 mcf of gas were sold, or 77,394 BOEs.
Due to the decline characteristics of the Partnership's oil and gas properties,
management expects a certain amount of decline in production in the future until
the Partnership's economically recoverable reserves are fully depleted.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $12.19, or 68%, from
$17.90 in 1999 to $30.09 in 2000. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $6.35, or 63%, from $10.15 in 1999 to $16.50 in 2000. The average
price received per mcf of gas increased 82% from $1.61 in 1999 to $2.93 in 2000.
The market price for oil and gas has been extremely volatile in the past decade
and management expects a certain amount of volatility to continue in the
foreseeable future. The Partnership may therefore sell its future oil and gas
production at average prices lower or higher than that received in 2000.
Gain on disposition of assets of $2,273 was recognized during 2000 from
equipment credits received on one fully depleted well.
Total costs and expenses increased in 2000 to $713,527 as compared to $655,625
in 1999, an increase of $57,902, or 9%. The increase was due to an increase in
production costs, offset by decreases in depletion and general and
administrative expenses ("G&A").
Production costs were $576,561 in 2000 and $442,342 in 1999, resulting in an
increase of $134,219, or 30%. This increase was primarily due to higher
production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and additional well
maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well production.
G&A's components are independent accounting and engineering fees and managing
general partner personnel and operating costs. During this period, G&A decreased
22% from $68,860 in 1999 to $53,623 in 2000. The Partnership paid the managing
general partner $38,999 in 2000 and $33,982 in 1999 for G&A incurred on behalf
of the Partnership. The remaining G&A was paid directly by the Partnership. The
managing general partner determines the allocated expenses based upon the level
of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership activities of the
managing general partner. The method of allocation has been consistent over the
past several years with certain modifications incorporated to reflect changes in
Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Depletion was $83,343 in 2000 as compared to $144,423 in 1999, representing a
decrease of $61,080, or 42%. This decrease was primarily due to a 82,084 barrels
of oil increase in proved reserves during 2000 as a result of higher commodity
prices.
5
1999 compared to 1998
The Partnership's 1999 oil and gas revenues increased 30% to $1,136,073 from
$873,012 in 1998. The increase in revenues resulted from higher average prices
received, offset by a decline in production. In 1999, 46,030 barrels of oil,
19,026 barrels of NGLs and 74,025 mcf of gas were sold, or 77,394 BOEs. In 1998,
49,100 barrels of oil, 17,427 barrels of NGLs and 68,244 mcf of gas were sold,
or 77,901 BOEs.
The average price received per barrel of oil increased $4.57, or 34%, from
$13.33 in 1998 to $17.90 in 1999. The average price received per barrel of NGLs
increased $3.36, or 49%, from $6.79 in 1998 to $10.15 in 1999. The average price
received per mcf of gas increased 10% from $1.47 in 1998 to $1.61 in 1999.
Gain on disposition of assets of $197 recognized in 1998 was attributable to
credits received from the disposal of oil and gas equipment on a saltwater
disposal well that was plugged and abandoned in a prior year.
Total costs and expenses decreased in 1999 to $655,625 as compared to $1,062,299
in 1998, a decrease of $406,674, or 38%. The decrease was due to declines in the
impairment of oil and gas properties, depletion and production costs, offset by
an increase in G&A.
Production costs were $442,342 in 1999 and $464,489 in 1998, resulting in a
$22,147 decrease, or 5%. This decrease was due to lower ad valorem taxes and
well maintenance costs, offset by an increase in production taxes due to
increased oil and gas revenues.
During this period, G&A increased 58% from $43,606 in 1998 to $68,860 in 1999
primarily due to a higher percentage of the managing general partner's G&A being
allocated (limited to 3% of oil and gas revenues) as a result of increased oil
and gas revenues. The Partnership paid the managing general partner $33,982 in
1999 and $27,503 in 1998 for G&A incurred on behalf of the Partnership.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the managing general partner reviews the
Partnership's oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of
the Partnership's assets may have occurred. As a result of the review and
evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Partnership recognized a
non-cash charge of $295,542 related to its oil and gas properties during 1998.
Depletion was $144,423 in 1999 compared to $258,662 in 1998. This represented a
decrease of $114,239, or 44%. This decrease was primarily the result of an
increase in proved reserves of 362,706 barrels of oil during 1999 as a result of
higher commodity prices, a reduction in the Partnership's net depletable basis
from charges taken in accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of
1998.
6
Petroleum industry
The petroleum industry has been characterized by volatile oil, NGL and natural
gas commodity prices and relatively stable supplier costs during the three years
ended December 31, 2000. During 1998, weather patterns, regional economic
recessions and political matters combined to cause worldwide oil supplies to
exceed demand resulting in a substantial decline in oil prices. Also during
1998, but to a lesser extent, market prices for natural gas declined. During
1999 and 2000, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") and
certain other crude oil exporting nations announced reductions in their planned
export volumes. Those announcements, together with the enactment of the
announced reductions in export volumes, had a positive impact on world oil
prices, as have overall natural gas supply and demand fundamentals on North
American natural gas prices. Although the favorable commodity price environment
and stable field service cost environment is expected to continue during 2001,
there is no assurance that commodity prices will not return to a less favorable
level or that field service costs will not escalate in the future, both of which
could negatively impact the Partnership's future results of operations and cash
distributions.
Liquidity and capital resources
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $766,498 during the year
ended December 31, 2000 from 1999. This increase was due to an increase in oil
and gas sales receipts of $919,054 and a decline in G&A expenses paid of
$15,237, offset by increases in production costs paid of $134,219 and working
capital of $33,574. The increase in oil and gas receipts resulted from the
increase in commodity prices during 2000 which contributed an additional
$788,626 to oil and gas receipts and $130,428 resulting from the increase in
production during 2000. The increase in production costs was primarily due to
increased production taxes associated with higher oil and gas prices and
additional well maintenance and workover costs incurred to stimulate well
production.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
The Partnership's principal investing activities during 2000 and 1999 were
related to the addition of equipment on various oil and gas properties.
Proceeds from asset dispositions of $2,372 recognized during 2000 were related
to equipment credits on two active wells.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
In 2000, cash distributions to the partners were $1,337,963, of which $13,380
was distributed to the managing general partner and $1,324,583 to the limited
partners. In 1999, cash distributions to the partners were $486,135, of which
$4,861 was distributed to the managing general partner and $481,274 to the
limited partners.
7
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements of Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.:
Independent Auditors' Report........................................................................ 9
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999..................................................... 10
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998............................................................................... 11
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.................................................................. 12
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998............................................................................... 13
Notes to Financial Statements....................................................................... 14
8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership):
We have audited the balance sheets of Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
9
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 185,644 $ 213,165
Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales 281,416 197,204
------------- -------------
Total current assets 467,060 410,369
------------- -------------
Oil and gas properties - at cost, based on the
successful efforts accounting method 9,761,207 9,748,898
Accumulated depletion (8,398,807) (8,315,464)
------------- -------------
Net oil and gas properties 1,362,400 1,433,434
------------- -------------
$ 1,829,460 $ 1,843,803
============== ==============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliate $ 6,714 $ 37,188
Partners' capital:
Managing general partner 15,195 15,034
Limited partners (11,249 interests) 1,807,551 1,791,581
------------- -------------
1,822,746 1,806,615
------------- -------------
$ 1,829,460 $ 1,843,803
============== ==============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues:
Oil and gas $ 2,046,224 $ 1,136,073 $ 873,012
Interest 19,124 10,221 11,185
Gain on disposition of assets 2,273 -- 197
----------- ----------- -----------
2,067,621 1,146,294 884,394
----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas production 576,561 442,342 464,489
General and administrative 53,623 68,860 43,606
Impairment of oil and gas properties -- -- 295,542
Depletion 83,343 144,423 258,662
----------- ----------- -----------
713,527 655,625 1,062,299
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 1,354,094 $ 490,669 $ (177,905)
=========== =========== ===========
Allocation of net income (loss):
Managing general partner $ 13,541 $ 4,907 $ (1,779)
=========== =========== ===========
Limited partners $ 1,340,553 $ 485,762 $ (176,126)
=========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest $ 119.17 $ 43.18 $ (15.66)
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Managing
general Limited
partner partners Total
-------------- -------------- ----------------
Partners' capital at January 1, 1998 $ 20,944 $ 2,376,754 $ 2,397,698
Distributions (4,177) (413,535) (417,712)
Net loss (1,779) (176,126) (177,905)
----------- ----------- ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1998 14,988 1,787,093 1,802,081
Distributions (4,861) (481,274) (486,135)
Net income 4,907 485,762 490,669
----------- ----------- ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 1999 15,034 1,791,581 1,806,615
Distributions (13,380) (1,324,583) (1,337,963)
Net income 13,541 1,340,553 1,354,094
----------- ----------- ------------
Partners' capital at December 31, 2000 $ 15,195 $ 1,807,551 $ 1,822,746
============ ============ =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Cash flows from operations:
Net income (loss) $ 1,354,094 $ 490,669 $ (177,905)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 295,542
Depletion 83,343 144,423 258,662
Gain on disposition of assets (2,273) - (197)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (84,212) (100,045) 39,758
Accounts payable (30,474) 18,933 (8,855)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,320,478 553,980 407,005
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to oil and gas properties (12,408) (19,911) (24,381)
Proceeds from asset dispositions 2,372 - 197
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities (10,036) (19,911) (24,184)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Cash distributions to partners (1,337,963) (486,135) (417,712)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (27,521) 47,934 (34,891)
Cash at beginning of year 213,165 165,231 200,122
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash at end of year $ 185,644 $ 213,165 $ 165,231
============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
organized in 1991 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership's
managing general partner is Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. ("Pioneer USA").
The Partnership engages in oil and gas development and production in Texas
and is not involved in any industry segment other than oil and gas.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in
the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Oil and gas properties - The Partnership utilizes the successful efforts
method of accounting for its oil and gas properties and equipment. Under this
method, all costs associated with productive wells and nonproductive development
wells are capitalized while nonproductive exploration costs are expensed.
Capitalized costs relating to proved properties are depleted using the
unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on proved oil
(dominant mineral) reserves as evaluated by independent petroleum consultants.
The carrying amounts of properties sold or otherwise disposed of and the related
allowances for depletion are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in results of operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Partnership reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used on an individual
property basis, including oil and gas properties accounted for under the
successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is
less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the
Partnership recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements - Preparation
of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net income (loss) per limited partnership interest - The net income
(loss) per limited partnership interest is calculated by using the number of
outstanding limited partnership interests.
Income taxes - A Federal income tax provision has not been included in
the financial statements as the income of the Partnership is included in the
individual Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
14
Statements of cash flows - For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash
includes depository accounts held by banks.
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative
expenses are allocated in part to the Partnership by the managing general
partner. Allocated expenses are determined by the managing general partner based
upon the level of activity of the Partnership relative to the non-partnership
activities of the managing general partner. The method of allocation has been
consistent over the past several years with certain modifications incorporated
to reflect changes in Pioneer USA's overall business activities.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications may have been made to the
1999 and 1998 financial statements to conform to the 2000 financial statement
presentations.
Environmental - The Partnership is subject to extensive federal, state
and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly
changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may
require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the
disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future
economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by
past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a noncapital nature are recorded when
environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the
timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably
determinable. No such liabilities have been accrued as of December 31, 2000.
Revenue recognition - The Partnership uses the entitlements method of
accounting for oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas revenues.
NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS 121, the Partnership reviews its proved oil and
gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a
decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of the Partnership's oil and
gas properties. The Partnership has estimated the expected future cash flows of
its oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, based on
proved reserves, and compared such estimated future cash flows to the respective
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying
amounts were likely to be recoverable. For those proved oil and gas properties
for which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated future cash flows, an
impairment was determined to exist; therefore, the Partnership adjusted the
carrying amount of those oil and gas properties to their fair value as
determined by discounting their expected future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risks involved in the industry. As a result, the
Partnership recognized a non-cash impairment provision of $295,542 related to
its proved oil and gas properties during 1998.
15
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
The financial statement basis of the Partnership's net assets and
liabilities was $367,378 greater than the tax basis at December 31, 2000.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) per statements of
operations with the net income (loss) per Federal income tax returns for the
years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Net income (loss) per statements of operations $ 1,354,094 $ 490,669 $ (177,905)
Depletion and depreciation provisions for tax
reporting purposes greater than amounts for
financial reporting purposes (27,307) (115,006) (139,323)
Impairment of oil and gas properties for financial
reporting purposes - - 295,542
Salvage income - -
Intangible development costs capitalized for
financial reporting purposes and expensed
for tax reporting purposes (328) - -
Other, net (2,832) (4,142) 4,532
------------ ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) per Federal income
tax returns $ 1,323,627 $ 371,521 $ (17,154)
============= ============ ============
NOTE 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES
The following is a summary of the net costs incurred, whether
capitalized or expensed, related to the Partnership's oil and gas producing
activities for the years ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Development costs $ 12,408 $ 19,911 $ 24,381
============= ============ ============
Capitalized oil and gas properties consist of the following:
2000 1999
---------------- ----------------
Property acquisition costs $ 949,486 $ 949,486
Completed wells and equipment 8,811,721 8,799,412
------------- -------------
9,761,207 9,748,898
Accumulated depletion (8,398,807) (8,315,464)
------------- -------------
Net oil and gas properties $ 1,362,400 $ 1,433,434
============== ==============
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the
following related party transactions with the managing general partner during
the years ended December 31:
16
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard
industry operating agreements $ 196,507 $ 189,784 $ 182,097
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 38,999 $ 33,982 $ 27,503
The Partnership participates in oil and gas activities through an income
tax partnership (the "Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Pioneer USA,
P&P Employees 91-B GP ("EMPL") and the Partnership are parties to the Program
agreement. EMPL is a general partnership organized for the benefit of certain
employees of Pioneer USA. EMPL was merged with Pioneer USA on December 28, 2000.
The costs and revenues of the Program are allocated to Pioneer USA and
the Partnership as follows:
Pioneer USA (1) Partnership (1)
--------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Proceeds from disposition of depreciable and
depletable properties 34.3434343% 65.6565657%
All other revenues 34.3434343% 65.6565657%
Costs and expenses:
Lease acquisition costs, drilling and completion
costs and all other costs 24.2424242% 75.7575758%
Operating costs, reporting and legal expenses and
general and administrative expenses 34.3434343% 65.6565657%
(1) Includes Pioneer USA's 1% general partner ownership which is
allocated at the Partnership level and 10 limited partner interests
owned by Pioneer USA.
NOTE 7. OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information relating to the Partnership's
estimated proved oil and gas reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and
changes in such quantities during the years then ended. All of the Partnership's
reserves are proved developed and located within the United States. The
Partnership's reserves are based on an evaluation prepared by Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant, using criteria
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Oil and NGLs Gas
(bbls) (mcf)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at January 1, 1998 803,868 767,367
Revisions (224,362) (91,817)
Production (66,527) (68,244)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1998 512,979 607,306
Revisions 550,155 821,693
Production (65,056) (74,025)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 1999 998,078 1,354,974
Revisions 113,248 (43,847)
Production (69,550) (85,556)
---------- ----------
Net proved reserves at December 31, 2000 1,041,776 1,225,571
========== ==========
17
As of December 31, 2000, the estimated present value of future net
revenues of proved reserves, calculated using December 31, 2000 prices of $26.64
per barrel of oil, $13.59 per barrel of NGLs and $7.73 per mcf of gas,
discounted at 10% was approximately $8,364,000 and undiscounted was $17,283,000.
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and future net revenues therefrom. The estimates of proved reserves and related
future net revenues set forth in this Report are based on various assumptions,
which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Therefore, such estimates should
not be construed as estimates of the current market value of the Partnership's
proved reserves. The Partnership emphasizes that reserve estimates are
inherently imprecise and, accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available.
Disclosures about Oil & Gas Producing Activities
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed
by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes
only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved
reserves, discounted using a rate of 10% per year to reflect the estimated
timing of the future cash flows. A Federal income tax provision has not been
calculated as the income of the Partnership is included in the individual
Federal income tax returns of the respective partners.
Discounted future cash flow estimates like those shown below are not
intended to represent estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties.
Estimates of fair value should also consider anticipated future oil and gas
prices, interest rates, changes in development and production costs and risks
associated with future production. Because of these and other considerations,
any estimate of fair value is necessarily subjective and imprecise.
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Oil and gas producing activities:
Future cash inflows $ 33,121 $ 24,943 $ 5,585
Future production costs (15,838) (13,003) (4,101)
------------- ------------ -------------
17,283 11,940 1,484
10% annual discount factor (8,919) (6,088) (509)
------------- ------------ -------------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 8,364 $ 5,852 $ 975
============== ============= ==============
18
For the years ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(in thousands)
Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
Oil and gas sales, net of production costs $ (1,470) $ (694) $ (409)
Net changes in prices and production costs 2,610 2,945 (1,842)
Revisions of previous quantity estimates 721 4,406 (324)
Accretion of discount 585 97 327
Changes in production rates, timing and other 66 (1,877) (45)
------------- ------------ ------------
Change in present value of future net revenues 2,512 4,877 (2,293)
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, beginning of year 5,852 975 3,268
------------- ------------ ------------
Balance, end of year $ 8,364 $ 5,852 $ 975
============== ============= =============
NOTE 8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The following table reflects the major customers of the Partnership's oil
and gas sales (a major customer is defined as a customer whose sales exceed 10%
of total sales) during the periods ended December 31:
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Mobil Oil Corporation 48% 48% 48%
Plains Marketing, L.P. 22% 23% -
Genesis Crude Oil, L.P. - - 26%
Western Gas Resources, Inc. 4% 6% 22%
At December 31, 2000, the amounts receivable from Mobil Oil Corporation
and Plains Marketing, L.P. were $64,224 and $32,862, respectively, which are
included in the caption "Accounts receivable - oil and gas sales" in the
accompanying Balance Sheet.
Pioneer USA is of the opinion that the loss of any one purchaser would
not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Partnership to sell its oil,
NGLs and gas production.
NOTE 9. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a brief summary of the more significant provisions of
the limited partnership agreement:
Managing general partner - The managing general partner of the
Partnership is Pioneer USA. Pioneer USA has the power and authority to
manage, control and administer all Partnership affairs. As managing
general partner and operator of the Partnership's properties, all
production expenses are incurred by Pioneer USA and billed to the
Partnership. The majority of the Partnership's oil and gas revenues are
received directly by the Partnership, however, a
19
portion of the oil and gas revenue is initially received by Pioneer USA
prior to being paid to the Partnership. Under the limited partnership
agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of the Partnership's
acquisition, drilling and completion costs, and 1% of its operating and
general and administrative expenses. In return it is allocated 1% of the
Partnership's revenues.
Limited partner liability - The maximum amount of liability of any
limited partner is the total contributions of such partner plus his
share of any undistributed profits.
Initial capital contributions - The limited partners entered into
subscription agreements for aggregate capital contributions of
$11,249,000. The managing general partner is required to contribute
amounts equal to 1% of initial Partnership capital less sales commission
costs allocated to the limited partners and to contribute amounts
necessary to pay costs and expenses allocated to it under the
Partnership agreement to the extent its share of revenues does not cover
such costs.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. Under the limited
partnership agreement, the Partnership's managing general partner, Pioneer USA,
is granted the exclusive right and full authority to manage, control and
administer the Partnership's business.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the directors and executive
officers of Pioneer USA. Directors of Pioneer USA are elected to serve until the
next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
Age at
December 31,
Name 2000 Position
---- ---- --------
Scott D. Sheffield 48 President
Timothy L. Dove 44 Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Dennis E. Fagerstone 51 Executive Vice President and Director
Mark L. Withrow 53 Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Director
Danny Kellum 46 Executive Vice President - Domestic
Operations and Director
Rich Dealy 34 Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer
Scott D. Sheffield. Mr. Sheffield is a graduate of The University of
Texas with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering. Since August 1997, he has served as
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pioneer and President of
Pioneer USA. Mr. Sheffield assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of
Pioneer in August 1999. He served as a director of Pioneer USA from August 1997
until his resignation from the board in June 1999. Mr. Sheffield was the
President and a director of Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley") from May 1990 until August 1997 and was the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Parker & Parsley from October 1990 until August 1997.
He was the sole director of Parker & Parsley from May 1990 until October 1990.
Mr. Sheffield joined Parker & Parsley Development Company ("PPDC"), a
predecessor of Parker & Parsley, as a petroleum engineer in 1979. He served as
Vice President - Engineering of PPDC from September 1981 until April 1985 when
he was elected President and a director. In March 1989, Mr. Sheffield was
elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PPDC. Before
joining PPDC's predecessor, Mr. Sheffield was employed as a production and
reservoir engineer for Amoco Production Company.
21
Timothy L. Dove. Mr. Dove earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979 and received his M.B.A. in 1981
from the University of Chicago. He became Executive Vice President - Business
Development of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997 and was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Dove assumed the position of Chief
Financial Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA effective February 1, 2000. Mr.
Dove joined Parker & Parsley in May 1994 as Vice President - International and
was promoted to Senior Vice President - Business Development in October 1996, in
which position he served until August 1997. Prior to joining Parker & Parsley,
Mr. Dove was employed with Diamond Shamrock Corp., and its successor, Maxus
Energy Corp, in various capacities in international exploration and production,
marketing, refining and marketing and planning and development.
Dennis E. Fagerstone. Mr. Fagerstone, a graduate of the Colorado School
of Mines with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering, became an Executive Vice
President of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a
director of Pioneer USA in August 1997. He served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of MESA Inc. ("Mesa") from March 1, 1997 until
August 1997. From October 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Fagerstone served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mesa and from May 1991 to October
1996, he served as Vice President - Exploration and Production of Mesa. From
June 1988 to May 1991, Mr. Fagerstone served as Vice President - Operations of
Mesa.
Mark L. Withrow. Mr. Withrow, a graduate of Abilene Christian University
with a B. S. in Accounting and Texas Tech University with a Juris Doctorate
degree, became Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Pioneer and Pioneer USA in August 1997. He was also appointed a director of
Pioneer USA in August 1997. Mr. Withrow was Vice President - General Counsel of
Parker & Parsley from January 1991, when he joined Parker & Parsley, to January
1995, when he was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel. He was
Parker & Parsley's Secretary from August 1992 until August 1997. Prior to
joining Parker & Parsley, Mr. Withrow was the managing partner of the law firm
of Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & MacDonald, Midland, Texas.
Danny Kellum. Mr. Kellum, who received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University in 1979, was elected Executive
Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and Pioneer USA on May 18, 2000
and Director of Pioneer USA on February 1, 2000. From January 2000 until May
2000, Mr. Kellum served as Vice President - Domestic Operations of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA. Mr. Kellum served as Vice President Permian Division of Pioneer and
Pioneer USA from April 1998 until December 1999. From 1989 until 1994 he served
as Spraberry District Manager and as Vice President of the Spraberry and Permian
Division for Parker & Parsley until August of 1997. Mr. Kellum joined Parker &
Parsley as an operations engineer in 1981 after a brief career with Mobil Oil
Corporation.
Rich Dealy. Mr. Dealy is a graduate of Eastern New Mexico University
with a B.B.A. in Accounting and Finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. He
became Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer and Pioneer USA in
February 1998. Mr. Dealy served as Controller of Pioneer USA from August 1997 to
February 1998. He served as Controller of Parker & Parsley from August 1995 to
August 1997. Mr. Dealy joined Parker & Parsley as an Accounting Manager in July,
1992. He was previously employed with KPMG Peat Marwick as an Audit Senior, in
charge of Parker & Parsley's audit.
22
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership does not have any directors or officers. Management of the
Partnership is performed by the managing general partner. The Partnership
participates in oil and gas activities through an income tax partnership (the
"Program") pursuant to the Program agreement. Under the Program agreement,
Pioneer USA pays approximately 25% of the Program's acquisition, drilling and
completion costs and approximately 35% of its operating and general and
administrative expenses. In return, they are allocated approximately 35% of the
Program's revenues.
The Partnership does not directly pay any salaries of the executive officers or
employees of Pioneer USA, but does pay a portion of Pioneer USA's general and
administrative expenses of which these salaries are a part.
See Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information regarding fees and
reimbursements paid to the managing general partner by the Partnership.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Beneficial owners of more than five percent
The Partnership is not aware of any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of
the outstanding limited partnership interests of the Partnership. Pioneer USA
owned 10 limited partner interests at January 1, 2001.
(b) Security ownership of management
The Partnership does not have any officers or directors. The managing general
partner of the Partnership, Pioneer USA, has the exclusive right and full
authority to manage, control and administer the Partnership's business. Under
the limited partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the
outstanding limited partnership interests have the right to take certain
actions, including the removal of the managing general partner or any other
general partner. The Partnership is not aware of any current arrangement or
activity which may lead to such removal. The Partnership is not aware of any
officer or director of Pioneer USA who beneficially owns limited partnership
interests in the Partnership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the managing general partner
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreement, the Partnership had the following
related party transactions with the managing general partner during the years
ended December 31:
23
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
Payment of lease operating and supervision
charges in accordance with standard industry
operating agreements $ 196,507 $ 189,784 $ 182,097
Reimbursement of general and administrative
expenses $ 38,999 $ 33,982 $ 27,503
Under the limited partnership agreement, the managing general partner pays 1% of
the Partnership's acquisition, drilling and completion costs and 1% of its
operating and general and administrative expenses. In return, it is allocated 1%
of the Partnership's revenues. Also, see Notes 6 and 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data",
regarding the Partnership's participation with the managing general partner in
oil and gas activities of the Program.
24
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial statements
The following are filed as part of this Report:
Independent Auditors' Report
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Statements of partners' capital for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Notes to financial statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is in the financial statements or notes
thereto, or is not applicable nor required.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
25
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
Dated: March 27, 2001 By: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
--------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ Scott D. Sheffield President of Pioneer USA March 27, 2001
--------------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
/s/ Timothy L. Dove Executive Vice President, Chief March 27, 2001
-------------------------------------------- Financial Officer and Director of
Timothy L. Dove Pioneer USA
/s/ Dennis E. Fagerstone Executive Vice President and March 27, 2001
-------------------------------------------- Director of Pioneer USA
Dennis E. Fagerstone
/s/ Mark L. Withrow Executive Vice President, General March 27, 2001
-------------------------------------------- Counsel and Director of Pioneer USA
Mark L. Withrow
/s/ Danny Kellum Executive Vice President - Domestic March 27, 2001
-------------------------------------------- Operations and Director of Pioneer
Danny Kellum USA
/s/ Rich Dealy Vice President and Chief Accounting March 27, 2001
-------------------------------------------- Officer of Pioneer USA
Rich Dealy
26
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are incorporated by reference in response to
Item 14(c):
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
3(a) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership -
of Parker & Parsley 91-B, L.P. incorporated
by reference to Exhibit A of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-38582) (hereinafter
called the Partnership's Registration Statement)
4(b) Form of Limited Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit C of the
Partnership's Registration Statement
4(b) Form of General Partner Subscription Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit D of the
Partnership's Registration Statement
4(b) Power of Attorney incorporated by reference to -
Exhibit B of the Partnership's Registration
Statement
4(c) Specimen Certificate of Limited Partnership -
Interest incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3
of Amendment No. 2 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement
10(b) Development Drilling Program Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit B of the
Partnership's Registration Statement
27
PARKER & PARSLEY 91-B, L.P.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for the Partnership should be read in
connection with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the financial statements included in the attached
supplemental information.
Six months
ended
June 30, Years ended December 31,
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating results:
Oil and gas sales $ 732,727 $ 954,341 $2,046,224 $1,136,073 $ 873,012 $1,273,373 $1,632,595
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Impairment of oil and
gas properties $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 295,542 $ 323,078 $ --
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) $ 394,776 $ 604,592 $1,354,094 $ 490,669 $ (177,905) $ 222,730 $ 924,002
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Allocation of net income
(loss):
Managing general
partner $ 3,948 $ 6,046 $ 13,541 $ 4,907 $ (1,779) $ 2,227 $ 9,240
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners $ 390,828 $ 598,546 $1,340,553 $ 485,762 $ (176,126) $ 220,503 $ 914,762
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' net
income (loss) per limited
partnership interest $ 34.74 $ 53.21 $ 119.17 $ 43.18 $ (15.66) $ 19.60 $ 81.32
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Limited partners' cash
distributions per limited
partnership interest $ 24.81 $ 48.76 $ 117.75 $ 42.78 $ 36.76 $ 75.32 $ 84.40
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
As of period ended:
Total assets $1,977,307 $1,907,509 $1,829,460 $1,843,803 $1,820,336 $2,424,808 $3,051,464
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 20. INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS.
Article Twelfth of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Pioneer Parent provides that Pioneer Parent must indemnify its officers and
directors to the extent allowed by the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Pursuant to Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, Pioneer Parent
generally has the power to indemnify its present and former directors and
officers against expenses and liabilities incurred by them in connection with
any suit to which they are, or are threatened to be made, a party by reason of
their serving in those positions so long as they acted in good faith and in a
manner they reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests
of Pioneer Parent, and with respect to any criminal action, they had no
reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. With respect to suits by
or in the right of Pioneer Parent, however, indemnification is generally limited
to attorneys' fees and other expenses and is not available if the person is
adjudged to be liable to Pioneer Parent unless the court determines that
indemnification is appropriate. The statute expressly provides that the power to
indemnify authorized thereby is not exclusive of any rights granted under any
by-law, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, or
otherwise. Pioneer Parent also has the power to purchase and maintain insurance
for its directors and officers. Additionally, Article Twelfth of the Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Pioneer Parent provides that, in the
event that an officer or director files suit against Pioneer Parent seeking
indemnification of liabilities or expenses incurred, the burden will be on
Pioneer Parent to prove that the indemnification would not be permitted under
the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Pioneer Parent has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its
directors and officers. These agreements provide that Pioneer Parent must,
within 30 days of a request, indemnify an officer or director for liabilities
incurred to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation
Law. Pioneer Parent must, within two days of a request, indemnify an officer or
director for expenses incurred in the defense of a claim or other proceeding.
The obligation of Pioneer Parent to provide the indemnification does not apply
if, before the date on which Pioneer Parent must provide the indemnification,
Pioneer Parent's board of directors, or a representative chosen by the board of
directors, concludes that indemnification would be improper under the Delaware
General Corporation Law.
The preceding discussion of Pioneer Parent's Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law, and the indemnification agreements is not intended to be exhaustive and is
qualified in its entirety by such Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, and such
indemnification agreements.
ITEM 21. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
The following exhibits are filed with the registration statement:
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 20, 2001,
among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and the partnerships named
therein (included as Appendix F to the proxy statement/
prospectus forming a part of this Registration Statement).
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Pioneer
Parent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated June 27,
1997, Registration No. 333-26951).
3.2 Restated Bylaws of Pioneer Parent (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to Pioneer Parent's Registration Statement on
Form S-4 dated June 27, 1997, Registration No. 333-26951).
3.3 Certificate of Designations of Special Preferred Voting
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Pioneer
Parent's Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration
No. 333-42315, filed with the SEC on December 17, 1997).
II-1
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
3.4 Terms and Conditions of Exchangeable Shares (incorporated by
reference to Annex F to the Definitive Joint Management
Information Circular and Proxy Statement of Pioneer Parent
and Chauvco, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on
November 17, 1997).
3.5 Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to
Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer Parent's Registration Statement on
Form 8-A, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on July 24,
2001).
4.1 Form of Certificate of Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share, of Pioneer Parent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer Parent's Registration Statement on
Form S-4 dated June 27, 1997, Registration No. 333-26951).
4.2 Form of Certificate of Special Preferred Voting Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245,
filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
4.3 Form of Certificate of Exchangeable Shares (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Pioneer Parent's Current Report
on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on
January 2, 1998).
4.4 Rights Agreement dated July 24, 2001, between Pioneer Parent
and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Registration Statement on Form 8-A, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on July 24, 2001).
5.1# Opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. as to the legality of the
securities to be registered.
8.1# Opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., regarding tax matters.
8.2# Opinion of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young L.L.P., as special
legal counsel to the limited partners, regarding tax and
other matters as required by the partnership agreement of
each partnership (included as Exhibit A to Appendix E to the
proxy statement/prospectus forming a part of this
Registration Statement).
9.1 Voting and Exchange Trust Agreement dated as of December 18,
1997, among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer Natural Resources
(Canada) Ltd. and Montreal Trust Company of Canada, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to Pioneer
Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245,
filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.1 Indenture dated July 2, 1996, among Pioneer USA (formerly
Mesa Operating Co. ("MOC")), as issuer, Pioneer Parent, as
guarantor, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee,
relating to the 11 5/8% Senior Subordinated Discount Notes
Due 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to MESA
Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 1996).
10.2 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 15, 1997,
among Pioneer USA (formerly MOC), as issuer, MESA Inc.
("Mesa"), the subsidiary guarantors named therein, Pioneer
Parent and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, with
respect to the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.1
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 1997, File No. 001-13245).
10.3 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 7, 1997,
among Pioneer USA (formerly MOC), as issuer, Mesa, the
subsidiary guarantors named therein, Pioneer Parent and
Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to
the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.1 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997,
File No. 001-13245).
II-2
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.4 Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 18, 1997,
among Pioneer USA, the subsidiary guarantors named therein,
Pioneer Parent and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as
trustee, with respect to the indenture identified above as
Exhibit 10.1 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to
Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.5 Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer USA (formerly MOC), Pioneer Parent, Pioneer
NewSub1, Inc. and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee,
with respect to the indenture identified above as Exhibit
10.1 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Pioneer
Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245,
filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.6 Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer NewSub1, Inc. (as successor to Pioneer USA),
Pioneer Parent, Pioneer DebtCo., Inc. and Harris Trust and
Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to the indenture
identified above as Exhibit 10.1 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.14 to Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form
8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2,
1998).
10.7 Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer DebtCo. Inc. (as successor to Pioneer NewSub1,
Inc.), Pioneer Parent, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as
trustee, with respect to the indenture identified above as
Exhibit 10.1 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to
Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.8 Indenture dated July 2, 1996, among Pioneer USA (formerly
MOC), as issuer, Pioneer Parent (as Mesa's successor), as
guarantor, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee,
relating to the 10 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to Mesa's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
1996).
10.9 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 15, 1997,
among Pioneer USA (formerly MOC), as issuer, Mesa, the
subsidiary guarantors named therein, Pioneer Parent and
Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to
the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997,
File No. 001-13245).
10.10 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 7, 1997,
among Pioneer USA (formerly MOC), as issuer, Mesa, the
subsidiary guarantors named therein, Pioneer Parent and
Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to
the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997,
File No. 001-13245).
10.11 Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 18, 1997,
among Pioneer USA, the subsidiary guarantors named therein,
Pioneer Parent and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as
trustee, with respect to the indenture identified above as
Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to
Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.12 Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer USA, Pioneer Parent, Pioneer NewSub1, Inc. and
Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to
the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Pioneer Parent's Current
Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC
on January 2, 1998).
II-3
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.13 Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer NewSub1, Inc. (as successor to Pioneer USA),
Pioneer Parent, Pioneer DebtCo, Inc. and Harris Trust and
Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to the indenture
identified above as Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.8 to Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form
8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2,
1998).
10.14 Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer DebtCo, Inc. (as successor to Pioneer NewSub1,
Inc.), Pioneer Parent and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as
trustee, with respect to the indenture identified above as
Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to
Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.15 Indenture dated April 12, 1995, between Pioneer USA
(successor to Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley")) and The Chase Manhattan Bank (National
Association), as trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Parker & Parsley's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated April 12, 1995, File No. 1-10695).
10.16 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 7, 1997,
among Parker & Parsley, The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
trustee, and Pioneer USA, with respect to the indenture
identified above as Exhibit 10.15 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997, File No.
001-13245).
10.17 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer USA, Pioneer NewSub1, Inc. and The Chase
Manhattan Bank, as trustee, with respect to the indenture
identified above as Exhibit 10.15 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.17 to Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form
8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2,
1998).
10.18 Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer NewSub1, Inc. (as successor to Pioneer USA),
Pioneer DebtCo, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
trustee, with respect to the indenture identified above as
Exhibit 10.15 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to
Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.19 Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer DebtCo, Inc. (as successor to Pioneer NewSub1,
Inc., as successor to Pioneer USA), Pioneer Parent, Pioneer
USA and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee, with respect
to the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.15
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Pioneer
Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245,
filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.20 Guarantee dated as of December 30, 1997, by Pioneer USA
relating to $150,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of
8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2005 and $150,000,000 in aggregate
principal amount of 8 1/4% Senior Notes due 2007 issued
under the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.15
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Pioneer
Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245,
filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.21 Form of 8 7/8% Senior Notes Due 2005 dated as of April 12,
1995, in the aggregate principal amount of $150,000,000,
together with Officers' Certificate dated April 12, 1995,
establishing the terms of the 8 7/8% Senior Notes Due 2005
pursuant to the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.15
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Parker &
Parsley's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 1995, File No. 001-10695).
II-4
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.22 Form of 8 1/4% Senior Notes due 2007 dated as of August 22,
1995, in the aggregate principal amount of $150,000,000,
together with Officers' Certificate dated August 22, 1995,
establishing the terms of the 8 1/4% Senior Notes due 2007
pursuant to the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.15
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to Parker &
Parsley's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 17, 1995,
File No. 001-10695).
10.23 Indenture dated January 13, 1998, between Pioneer Parent and
The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 to Pioneer Parent's and Pioneer USA's
Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with
the SEC on January 14, 1998).
10.24 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 13, 1998,
among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, as the subsidiary
guarantor, and The Bank of New York, as trustee, with
respect to the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.23
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Pioneer
Parent's and Pioneer USA's Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 14, 1998).
10.25 Form of 6.50% Senior Notes Due 2008 of Pioneer Parent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Pioneer
Parent's and Pioneer USA's Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 14, 1998).
10.26 Form of 7.20% Senior Notes Due 2028 of Pioneer Parent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Pioneer
Parent's and Pioneer USA's Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 14, 1998).
10.27 Guarantee (2008 Notes) dated as of January 13, 1998, entered
into by Pioneer USA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.5 to Pioneer Parent's and Pioneer USA's Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January
14, 1998).
10.28 Guarantee (2028 Notes) dated as of January 13, 1998, entered
into by Pioneer USA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.6 to Pioneer Parent's and Pioneer USA's Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January
14, 1998).
10.29 1991 Stock Option Plan of Mesa (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10(v) to Mesa's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 1991).
10.30 1996 Incentive Plan of Mesa (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.28 to Pioneer Parent's Registration Statement on
Form S-4 dated June 27, 1997, Registration No. 333-26951).
10.31 Parker & Parsley Long-Term Incentive Plan dated February 19,
1991 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Parker &
Parsley's Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration
No. 33-38971).
10.32 First Amendment to the Parker & Parsley Long-Term Incentive
Plan dated August 23, 1991 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Parker & Parsley's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 dated February 28, 1992, Registration No.
33-46082).
10.33 Pioneer Parent's Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer Parent's Registration
Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-35087).
10.34 First Amendment to Pioneer Parent's Long-Term Incentive
Plan, effective as of November 23, 1998 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.72 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1999, File
No. 001-13245.
II-5
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.35 Amendment No. 2 to Pioneer Parent's Long-Term Incentive
Plan, effective as of May 20, 1998 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.73 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1999, File
No. 001-13245).
10.36 Amendment No. 3 to Pioneer Parent's Long-Term Incentive
Plan, effective as of February 17, 2000 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.76 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1999, File
No. 001-13245).
10.37 Pioneer Parent's Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer Parent's Registration
Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-35165).
10.38 Amendment No. 1 to Pioneer Parent's Employee Stock Purchase
Plan dated December 9, 1998 (incorporated by reference to
Pioneer Parent's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998, File No. 001-13245).
10.39 Amendment No. 2 to Pioneer Parent's Employee Stock Purchase
Plan dated December 14, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.74 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 1999, File No. 001-13245).
10.40 Pioneer Parent's Deferred Compensation Retirement Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration
No. 333-39153).
10.41 Pioneer USA 401(k) Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer Parent's Registration Statement on
Form S-8, Registration No. 333-39249).
10.42 Pioneer USA Matching Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.42 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-13245).
10.43 Omnibus Amendment to Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreements,
included as part of the Parker & Parsley Long-Term Incentive
Plan dated as of November 16, 1995, between Parker & Parsley
and named executive officers identified on Schedule 1
thereto, setting forth additional details relating to the
Parker & Parsley Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Parker & Parsley's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 1995, File No. 001-10695).
10.44 Severance Agreement dated as of August 8, 1997, between
Pioneer Parent and Scott D. Sheffield, together with a
schedule identifying substantially identical agreements
between Pioneer Parent and each of the other named executive
officers identified on Schedule I, for the purpose of
defining the payment of certain benefits upon the
termination of the officer's employment under certain
circumstances (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
Pioneer Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 1997, File No. 001-13245).
10.45 Indemnification Agreement dated as of August 8, 1997,
between Pioneer Parent and Scott D. Sheffield, together with
a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements
between Pioneer Parent and each of Pioneer Parent's other
directors and named executive officers identified on
Schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.8 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 1997, File No. 001-13245).
10.46 "B" Contract Production Allocation Agreement dated July 29,
1991, and effective as of January 1, 1991, between Colorado
Interstate Gas Company and Mesa Operating Limited
Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(r) to
Mesa's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 1991).
II-6
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.47 Amendment to "B" Contract Production Allocation Agreement
effective as of January 1, 1993, between Colorado Interstate
Gas Company and Mesa Operating Limited Partnership
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Mesa's
Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No.
33-51909).
10.48 Voting and Shareholders Agreement dated as of February 8,
2000, among Prize Energy Corp. and its stockholders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pioneer
Parent's statement on Schedule 13D relating to common stock
of Prize Energy Corp., filed with the SEC on February 18,
2000, File No. 005-54797).
10.49 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 11, 2000,
among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, as the subsidiary
guarantor, and the Bank of New York, as trustee, with
respect to the Indenture dated January 13, 1998, between
Pioneer Parent and The Bank of New York, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC
on May 11, 2000).
10.50 Form of 9 5/8% Senior Notes Due April 1, 2010 dated as of
April 11, 2000, in the aggregate principal amount of
$425,000,000, together with Trustee's Certificate of
Authentication dated April 11, 2000, establishing the terms
of the 9 5/8% Senior Notes Due April 1, 2010 pursuant to the
Second Supplemental Indenture identified above as Exhibit
10.49 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Pioneer
Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC
on May 11, 2000).
10.51 Guarantee, dated as of April 11, 2000, by Pioneer USA, as
the subsidiary guarantor, relating to the $425,000,000
aggregate principal amount of 9 5/8% Senior Notes Due April
1, 2010 issued under the Second Supplemental Indenture
identified above as Exhibit 10.49 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, filed with the SEC on May 11, 2000).
10.52 $575,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of May 31, 2000,
among Pioneer Parent, as the borrower, Bank of America,
N.A., as the administrative agent, Credit Suisse First
Boston, as the documentation agent, The Chase Manhattan
Bank, as the syndication agent, and certain lenders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Pioneer
Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC
on August 9, 2000).
10.53 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 28, 2000,
among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, Parker & Parsley
Employees Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley
Employees Producing Properties 87-B Ltd., P&P Employees
Producing Properties 88-A, L.P., P&P Employees 89-A Conv.,
L.P., P&P Employees 89-B Conv., L.P., P&P Employees Private
89, L.P., P&P Employees 90-A Conv., L.P., P& P Employees
90-B Conv., L.P., P&P Employees 90-C Conv., L.P., P&P
Employees Private 90, L.P., P&P Employees 90 Spraberry
Private Development, L.P., P&P Employees 91-A Conv., L.P.
and P&P Employees 91-B Conv., L.P. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.53 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report
on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2001).
23.1# Consent of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. (included in the opinions
filed as Exhibits 5.1 and 8.1 to this Registration
Statement).
23.2# Consent of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young L.L.P. (included
in the opinion filed as Exhibit 8.2 to this Registration
Statement).
23.3# Consent of Arter & Hadden LLP (included in the opinion
attached to the opinion filed as Exhibit 8.2 to this
Registration Statement).
II-7
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
23.4* Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
23.5* Consent of Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.
24.1# Powers of Attorney of directors and officers of Pioneer
Parent.
99.1 Opinion of Robert A. Stanger & Co, Inc. (included as
Appendix D to the proxy statement/ prospectus forming a part
of this Registration Statement).
99.2* Consent of Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc.
99.3# Form of Certification of Non-Foreign Status for Individual
Partners.
99.4# Form of Certification of Non-Foreign Status for Individual
Partners that are Entities.
99.5* Form of Proxy for Special Meeting of Limited Partners of
Each of 46 Parker & Parsley Limited Partnerships.
99.6* Form of Letter to Custodians and Consent.
99.7# Agreement dated June 14, 2001, between Pioneer Parent and
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
99.8* Form of Letter to Brokers.
99.9# Form of Notice of Multiple Proxies.
99.10# Form of Mailing Envelope.
99.11# Form of Return Envelope.
99.12* Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Proposed Mergers of
Parker & Parsley Limited Partnerships (for use in responding
to telephone inquiries only).
---------------
* Filed herewith.
# Previously filed.
ITEM 22. UNDERTAKINGS.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of
Pioneer Parent pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, Pioneer
Parent has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a
claim for indemnification against such liabilities, other than the payment by
Pioneer Parent of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or
controlling person of Pioneer Parent in the successful defense of any action,
suit or proceeding, is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person
in connection with the securities being registered, Pioneer Parent will, unless
in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
Pioneer Parent hereby undertakes:
(1) That, for purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each filing of Pioneer Parent's annual report
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan's annual
report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be
deemed to be a new
II-8
registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof;
(2) That prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered
hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this registration
statement by any person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within
the meaning of Rule 145(c), Pioneer Parent undertakes that such reoffering
prospectus will contain the information called for by the applicable
registration form with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed
underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the other items
of the applicable form;
(3) That every prospectus: (a) that is filed pursuant to paragraph (3)
immediately preceding, or (b) that purports to meet the requirements of
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is used in
connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415, will be
filed as a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not
be used until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such
post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide
offering thereof;
(4) To respond to requests for information that is incorporated by
reference into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of Form
S-4, within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send the
incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally prompt means.
This includes information contained in documents filed subsequent to the
effective date of the registration statement through the date of responding
to the request; and
(5) To supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information
concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired involved therein,
that was not the subject of and included in the registration statement when
it became effective.
II-9
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, Pioneer Natural
Resources Company has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Irving,
State of Texas, on October 10, 2001.
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
By: /s/ Scott D. Sheffield
------------------------------------------
Scott D. Sheffield
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
/s/ SCOTT D. SHEFFIELD Chairman of the Board of Directors, October 10, 2001
----------------------------------------------------- President and Chief Executive Officer
Scott D. Sheffield (principal executive officer)
/s/ TIMOTHY L. DOVE Executive Vice President and Chief October 10, 2001
----------------------------------------------------- Financial Officer (principal financial
Timothy L. Dove officer)
/s/ RICHARD P. DEALY Vice President and Chief Accounting October 10, 2001
----------------------------------------------------- Officer (principal accounting officer)
Richard P. Dealy
/s/ JAMES R. BAROFFIO Director October 10, 2001
-----------------------------------------------------
James R. Baroffio
/s/ R. HARTWELL GARDNER Director October 10, 2001
-----------------------------------------------------
R. Hartwell Gardner
/s/ JAMES L. HOUGHTON Director October 10, 2001
-----------------------------------------------------
James L. Houghton
/s/ JERRY P. JONES Director October 10, 2001
-----------------------------------------------------
Jerry P. Jones
/s/ CHARLES E. RAMSEY, JR. Director October 10, 2001
-----------------------------------------------------
Charles E. Ramsey, Jr.
II-10
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 20, 2001,
among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA and the partnerships named
therein (included as Appendix F to the proxy statement/
prospectus forming a part of this Registration Statement).
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Pioneer
Parent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated June 27,
1997, Registration No. 333-26951).
3.2 Restated Bylaws of Pioneer Parent (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to Pioneer Parent's Registration Statement on
Form S-4 dated June 27, 1997, Registration No. 333-26951).
3.3 Certificate of Designations of Special Preferred Voting
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Pioneer
Parent's Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration
No. 333-42315, filed with the SEC on December 17, 1997).
3.4 Terms and Conditions of Exchangeable Shares (incorporated by
reference to Annex F to the Definitive Joint Management
Information Circular and Proxy Statement of Pioneer Parent
and Chauvco, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on
November 17, 1997).
3.5 Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to
Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer Parent's Registration Statement on
Form 8-A, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on July 24,
2001).
4.1 Form of Certificate of Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share, of Pioneer Parent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer Parent's Registration Statement on
Form S-4 dated June 27, 1997, Registration No. 333-26951).
4.2 Form of Certificate of Special Preferred Voting Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245,
filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
4.3 Form of Certificate of Exchangeable Shares (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Pioneer Parent's Current Report
on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on
January 2, 1998).
4.4 Rights Agreement dated July 24, 2001, between Pioneer Parent
and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Registration Statement on Form 8-A, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on July 24, 2001).
5.1# Opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. as to the legality of the
securities to be registered.
8.1# Opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., regarding tax matters.
8.2# Opinion of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young L.L.P., as special
legal counsel to the limited partners, regarding tax and
other matters as required by the partnership agreement of
each partnership (included as Exhibit A to Appendix E to the
proxy statement/prospectus forming a part of this
Registration Statement).
9.1 Voting and Exchange Trust Agreement dated as of December 18,
1997, among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer Natural Resources
(Canada) Ltd. and Montreal Trust Company of Canada, as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to Pioneer
Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245,
filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.1 Indenture dated July 2, 1996, among Pioneer USA (formerly
Mesa Operating Co. ("MOC")), as issuer, Pioneer Parent, as
guarantor, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee,
relating to the 11 5/8% Senior Subordinated Discount Notes
Due 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to MESA
Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 1996).
10.2 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 15, 1997,
among Pioneer USA (formerly MOC), as issuer, MESA Inc.
("Mesa"), the subsidiary guarantors named therein, Pioneer
Parent and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, with
respect to the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.1
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 1997, File No. 001-13245).
10.3 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 7, 1997,
among Pioneer USA (formerly MOC), as issuer, Mesa, the
subsidiary guarantors named therein, Pioneer Parent and
Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to
the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.1 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997,
File No. 001-13245).
10.4 Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 18, 1997,
among Pioneer USA, the subsidiary guarantors named therein,
Pioneer Parent and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as
trustee, with respect to the indenture identified above as
Exhibit 10.1 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to
Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.5 Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer USA (formerly MOC), Pioneer Parent, Pioneer
NewSub1, Inc. and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee,
with respect to the indenture identified above as Exhibit
10.1 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Pioneer
Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245,
filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.6 Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer NewSub1, Inc. (as successor to Pioneer USA),
Pioneer Parent, Pioneer DebtCo., Inc. and Harris Trust and
Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to the indenture
identified above as Exhibit 10.1 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.14 to Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form
8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2,
1998).
10.7 Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer DebtCo. Inc. (as successor to Pioneer NewSub1,
Inc.), Pioneer Parent, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as
trustee, with respect to the indenture identified above as
Exhibit 10.1 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to
Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.8 Indenture dated July 2, 1996, among Pioneer USA (formerly
MOC), as issuer, Pioneer Parent (as Mesa's successor), as
guarantor, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee,
relating to the 10 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to Mesa's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
1996).
10.9 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 15, 1997,
among Pioneer USA (formerly MOC), as issuer, Mesa, the
subsidiary guarantors named therein, Pioneer Parent and
Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to
the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997,
File No. 001-13245).
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.10 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 7, 1997,
among Pioneer USA (formerly MOC), as issuer, Mesa, the
subsidiary guarantors named therein, Pioneer Parent and
Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to
the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997,
File No. 001-13245).
10.11 Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 18, 1997,
among Pioneer USA, the subsidiary guarantors named therein,
Pioneer Parent and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as
trustee, with respect to the indenture identified above as
Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to
Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.12 Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer USA, Pioneer Parent, Pioneer NewSub1, Inc. and
Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to
the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Pioneer Parent's Current
Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC
on January 2, 1998).
10.13 Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer NewSub1, Inc. (as successor to Pioneer USA),
Pioneer Parent, Pioneer DebtCo, Inc. and Harris Trust and
Savings Bank, as trustee, with respect to the indenture
identified above as Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.8 to Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form
8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2,
1998).
10.14 Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer DebtCo, Inc. (as successor to Pioneer NewSub1,
Inc.), Pioneer Parent and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as
trustee, with respect to the indenture identified above as
Exhibit 10.8 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to
Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.15 Indenture dated April 12, 1995, between Pioneer USA
(successor to Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company ("Parker &
Parsley")) and The Chase Manhattan Bank (National
Association), as trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Parker & Parsley's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated April 12, 1995, File No. 1-10695).
10.16 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 7, 1997,
among Parker & Parsley, The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
trustee, and Pioneer USA, with respect to the indenture
identified above as Exhibit 10.15 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997, File No.
001-13245).
10.17 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer USA, Pioneer NewSub1, Inc. and The Chase
Manhattan Bank, as trustee, with respect to the indenture
identified above as Exhibit 10.15 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.17 to Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form
8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2,
1998).
10.18 Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer NewSub1, Inc. (as successor to Pioneer USA),
Pioneer DebtCo, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
trustee, with respect to the indenture identified above as
Exhibit 10.15 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to
Pioneer Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.19 Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 30, 1997,
among Pioneer DebtCo, Inc. (as successor to Pioneer NewSub1,
Inc., as successor to Pioneer USA), Pioneer Parent, Pioneer
USA and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee, with respect
to the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.15
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Pioneer
Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245,
filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.20 Guarantee dated as of December 30, 1997, by Pioneer USA
relating to $150,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of
8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2005 and $150,000,000 in aggregate
principal amount of 8 1/4% Senior Notes due 2007 issued
under the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.15
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Pioneer
Parent's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245,
filed with the SEC on January 2, 1998).
10.21 Form of 8 7/8% Senior Notes Due 2005 dated as of April 12,
1995, in the aggregate principal amount of $150,000,000,
together with Officers' Certificate dated April 12, 1995,
establishing the terms of the 8 7/8% Senior Notes Due 2005
pursuant to the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.15
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Parker &
Parsley's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 1995, File No. 001-10695).
10.22 Form of 8 1/4% Senior Notes due 2007 dated as of August 22,
1995, in the aggregate principal amount of $150,000,000,
together with Officers' Certificate dated August 22, 1995,
establishing the terms of the 8 1/4% Senior Notes due 2007
pursuant to the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.15
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to Parker &
Parsley's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 17, 1995,
File No. 001-10695).
10.23 Indenture dated January 13, 1998, between Pioneer Parent and
The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 to Pioneer Parent's and Pioneer USA's
Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with
the SEC on January 14, 1998).
10.24 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 13, 1998,
among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, as the subsidiary
guarantor, and The Bank of New York, as trustee, with
respect to the indenture identified above as Exhibit 10.23
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Pioneer
Parent's and Pioneer USA's Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 14, 1998).
10.25 Form of 6.50% Senior Notes Due 2008 of Pioneer Parent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Pioneer
Parent's and Pioneer USA's Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 14, 1998).
10.26 Form of 7.20% Senior Notes Due 2028 of Pioneer Parent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Pioneer
Parent's and Pioneer USA's Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January 14, 1998).
10.27 Guarantee (2008 Notes) dated as of January 13, 1998, entered
into by Pioneer USA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.5 to Pioneer Parent's and Pioneer USA's Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January
14, 1998).
10.28 Guarantee (2028 Notes) dated as of January 13, 1998, entered
into by Pioneer USA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.6 to Pioneer Parent's and Pioneer USA's Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 001-13245, filed with the SEC on January
14, 1998).
10.29 1991 Stock Option Plan of Mesa (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10(v) to Mesa's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 1991).
10.30 1996 Incentive Plan of Mesa (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.28 to Pioneer Parent's Registration Statement on
Form S-4 dated June 27, 1997, Registration No. 333-26951).
10.31 Parker & Parsley Long-Term Incentive Plan dated February 19,
1991 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Parker &
Parsley's Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration
No. 33-38971).
10.32 First Amendment to the Parker & Parsley Long-Term Incentive
Plan dated August 23, 1991 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Parker & Parsley's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 dated February 28, 1992, Registration No.
33-46082).
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.33 Pioneer Parent's Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer Parent's Registration
Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-35087).
10.34 First Amendment to Pioneer Parent's Long-Term Incentive
Plan, effective as of November 23, 1998 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.72 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1999, File
No. 001-13245.
10.35 Amendment No. 2 to Pioneer Parent's Long-Term Incentive
Plan, effective as of May 20, 1998 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.73 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1999, File
No. 001-13245).
10.36 Amendment No. 3 to Pioneer Parent's Long-Term Incentive
Plan, effective as of February 17, 2000 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.76 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1999, File
No. 001-13245).
10.37 Pioneer Parent's Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer Parent's Registration
Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-35165).
10.38 Amendment No. 1 to Pioneer Parent's Employee Stock Purchase
Plan dated December 9, 1998 (incorporated by reference to
Pioneer Parent's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998, File No. 001-13245).
10.39 Amendment No. 2 to Pioneer Parent's Employee Stock Purchase
Plan dated December 14, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.74 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 1999, File No. 001-13245).
10.40 Pioneer Parent's Deferred Compensation Retirement Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration
No. 333-39153).
10.41 Pioneer USA 401(k) Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Pioneer Parent's Registration Statement on
Form S-8, Registration No. 333-39249).
10.42 Pioneer USA Matching Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.42 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-13245).
10.43 Omnibus Amendment to Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreements,
included as part of the Parker & Parsley Long-Term Incentive
Plan dated as of November 16, 1995, between Parker & Parsley
and named executive officers identified on Schedule 1
thereto, setting forth additional details relating to the
Parker & Parsley Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Parker & Parsley's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 1995, File No. 001-10695).
10.44 Severance Agreement dated as of August 8, 1997, between
Pioneer Parent and Scott D. Sheffield, together with a
schedule identifying substantially identical agreements
between Pioneer Parent and each of the other named executive
officers identified on Schedule I, for the purpose of
defining the payment of certain benefits upon the
termination of the officer's employment under certain
circumstances (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
Pioneer Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 1997, File No. 001-13245).
10.45 Indemnification Agreement dated as of August 8, 1997,
between Pioneer Parent and Scott D. Sheffield, together with
a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements
between Pioneer Parent and each of Pioneer Parent's other
directors and named executive officers identified on
Schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.8 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 1997, File No. 001-13245).
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.46 "B" Contract Production Allocation Agreement dated July 29,
1991, and effective as of January 1, 1991, between Colorado
Interstate Gas Company and Mesa Operating Limited
Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(r) to
Mesa's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 1991).
10.47 Amendment to "B" Contract Production Allocation Agreement
effective as of January 1, 1993, between Colorado Interstate
Gas Company and Mesa Operating Limited Partnership
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Mesa's
Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No.
33-51909).
10.48 Voting and Shareholders Agreement dated as of February 8,
2000, among Prize Energy Corp. and its stockholders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pioneer
Parent's statement on Schedule 13D relating to common stock
of Prize Energy Corp., filed with the SEC on February 18,
2000, File No. 005-54797).
10.49 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 11, 2000,
among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, as the subsidiary
guarantor, and the Bank of New York, as trustee, with
respect to the Indenture dated January 13, 1998, between
Pioneer Parent and The Bank of New York, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pioneer
Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC
on May 11, 2000).
10.50 Form of 9 5/8% Senior Notes Due April 1, 2010 dated as of
April 11, 2000, in the aggregate principal amount of
$425,000,000, together with Trustee's Certificate of
Authentication dated April 11, 2000, establishing the terms
of the 9 5/8% Senior Notes Due April 1, 2010 pursuant to the
Second Supplemental Indenture identified above as Exhibit
10.49 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Pioneer
Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC
on May 11, 2000).
10.51 Guarantee, dated as of April 11, 2000, by Pioneer USA, as
the subsidiary guarantor, relating to the $425,000,000
aggregate principal amount of 9 5/8% Senior Notes Due April
1, 2010 issued under the Second Supplemental Indenture
identified above as Exhibit 10.49 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to Pioneer Parent's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, filed with the SEC on May 11, 2000).
10.52 $575,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of May 31, 2000,
among Pioneer Parent, as the borrower, Bank of America,
N.A., as the administrative agent, Credit Suisse First
Boston, as the documentation agent, The Chase Manhattan
Bank, as the syndication agent, and certain lenders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Pioneer
Parent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC
on August 9, 2000).
10.53 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 28, 2000,
among Pioneer Parent, Pioneer USA, Parker & Parsley
Employees Producing Properties 87-A, Ltd., Parker & Parsley
Employees Producing Properties 87-B Ltd., P&P Employees
Producing Properties 88-A, L.P., P&P Employees 89-A Conv.,
L.P., P&P Employees 89-B Conv., L.P., P&P Employees Private
89, L.P., P&P Employees 90-A Conv., L.P., P& P Employees
90-B Conv., L.P., P&P Employees 90-C Conv., L.P., P&P
Employees Private 90, L.P., P&P Employees 90 Spraberry
Private Development, L.P., P&P Employees 91-A Conv., L.P.
and P&P Employees 91-B Conv., L.P. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.53 to Pioneer Parent's Annual Report
on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2001).
23.1# Consent of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. (included in the opinions
filed as Exhibits 5.1 and 8.1 to this Registration
Statement).
23.2# Consent of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young L.L.P. (included
in the opinion filed as Exhibit 8.2 to this Registration
Statement).
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ------------------------------------------------------------
23.3# Consent of Arter & Hadden LLP (included in the opinion
attached to the opinion filed as Exhibit 8.2 to this
Registration Statement).
23.4* Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
23.5* Consent of Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.
24.1# Powers of Attorney of directors and officers of Pioneer
Parent.
99.1 Opinion of Robert A. Stanger & Co, Inc. (included as
Appendix D to the proxy statement/ prospectus forming a part
of this Registration Statement).
99.2* Consent of Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc.
99.3# Form of Certification of Non-Foreign Status for Individual
Partners.
99.4# Form of Certification of Non-Foreign Status for Individual
Partners that are Entities.
99.5* Form of Proxy for Special Meeting of Limited Partners of
Each of 46 Parker & Parsley Limited Partnerships.
99.6* Form of Letter to Custodians and Consent.
99.7# Agreement dated June 14, 2001, between Pioneer Parent and
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
99.8* Form of Letter to Brokers.
99.9# Form of Notice of Multiple Proxies.
99.10# Form of Mailing Envelope.
99.11# Form of Return Envelope.
99.12* Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Proposed Mergers of
Parker & Parsley Limited Partnerships (for use in responding
to telephone inquiries only).
---------------
* Filed herewith.
# Previously filed.