e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
Commission file number
001-16783
VCA Antech, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
95-4097995
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
12401 West Olympic
Boulevard,
Los Angeles, California
|
|
90064-1022
(Zip code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
(310) 571-6500
Registrants telephone
number, including area code:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common Stock, par value
$0.001 per share
|
|
Nasdaq Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act.
Yes o No þ.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ.
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by
non-affiliates as of June 30, 2006, was approximately
$2.6 billion, computed by reference to the price of
$31.93 per share, the price at which the common equity was
last sold on such date as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market. For purposes of this computation, it is assumed that the
shares beneficially held by directors and officers of the
registrant would be deemed to be stock held by affiliates.
Non-affiliated common stock outstanding at June 30, 2006
was 80,850,999 shares.
Total common stock outstanding at February 26, 2007 was
83,628,292 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts of the definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to
stockholders in connection with the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders are incorporated by reference into
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 hereof.
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Forward-Looking
Statements
This annual report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that involve
risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they
materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results and the
results of our consolidated subsidiaries to differ materially
from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements. We generally identify forward-looking statements in
this report using words like believe,
intend, expect, estimate,
may, plan, should plan,
project, contemplate,
anticipate, predict,
potential, continue, or similar
expressions. You may find some of these statements below and
elsewhere in this report. These forward-looking statements are
not historical facts and are inherently uncertain and outside of
our control. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in
this report may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by
inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown
risks and uncertainties. Many factors mentioned in our
discussion in this report will be important in determining
future results. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can
be guaranteed. Actual future results may vary materially.
Factors that may cause our plans, expectations, future financial
condition and results to change include those items discussed in
Risk Factors in Item 1A of this annual report.
PART I
General
We are a leading animal healthcare services company operating in
the United States. We provide veterinary services and diagnostic
testing to support veterinary care and we sell diagnostic
imaging equipment and other medical technology products and
related services to the veterinary market.
Our network of veterinary diagnostic laboratories provides
sophisticated testing and consulting services used by
veterinarians in the detection, diagnosis, evaluation,
monitoring, treatment and prevention of diseases and other
conditions affecting animals. Our network of veterinary
diagnostic laboratories, consisting of 33 laboratories at
December 31, 2006, serves all 50 states and provides
diagnostic testing for over 15,000 clients, which includes
standard animal hospitals, large animal practices, universities
and other government organizations. Our animal hospitals offer a
full range of general medical and surgical services for
companion animals, as well as specialized treatments including
advanced diagnostic services, internal medicine, oncology,
ophthalmology, dermatology and cardiology. In addition, we
provide pharmaceutical products and perform a variety of pet
wellness programs including health examinations, diagnostic
testing, routine vaccinations, spaying, neutering and dental
care. Our network of animal hospitals, consisting of 379 at
December 31, 2006, is supported by more than 1,300
veterinarians and had over 5.4 million patient visits in
2006. Our medical technology business sells digital radiography
and ultrasound imaging equipment, provides education and
training on the use of that equipment, and provides consulting
and mobile imaging services.
We were formed in 1986 as a Delaware corporation. Our principal
executive offices are located at 12401 West Olympic
Boulevard, Los Angeles, California. We can be contacted at
(310) 571-6500.
Industry
Overview
According to American Pet Products Manufacturers Association,
Inc., or APPMA, the United States population of companion
animals in 2004 reached approximately 210 million,
including about 164 million dogs and cats. APPMA estimates
that over $18 billion was spent in the United States on
pets in 2004 for veterinary care, supplies, medicine and
boarding and grooming. The APPMA National Pet Owners
Survey indicated that the ownership of pets is widespread and
growing with over 69 million, or 63%, of
U.S. households owning at least one pet, including
companion and other animals. Specifically, 43 million
households owned at least one dog and 38 million households
owned at least one cat.
We believe that among the expanding number of pet owners is a
growing awareness of pet health and wellness, including the
benefits of preventive care and specialized services. As
technology continues to
1
migrate from the human healthcare sector into the practice of
veterinary medicine, more sophisticated treatments, diagnostic
tests and equipment are becoming available to treat companion
animals. These new and increasingly complex procedures,
diagnostic tests, including laboratory testing and advanced
imaging, and pharmaceuticals are gaining wider acceptance as pet
owners are exposed to these previously unconsidered treatment
programs through their exposure with this technology in human
healthcare, and through literature and marketing programs
sponsored by large pharmaceutical and pet nutrition companies.
Even as treatments available in veterinary medicine become more
complex, prices for veterinary services typically remain a low
percentage of a pet owners income, facilitating payment at
the time of service. Unlike the human healthcare industry,
providers of veterinary services are not dependent on
third-party payers in order to collect fees. As such, providers
of veterinary services typically do not have the problems of
extended payment collection cycles or pricing pressures from
third-party payers faced by human healthcare providers.
Outsourced laboratory testing and diagnostic equipment sales are
wholesale businesses that collect payments directly from animal
hospitals under standard industry payment terms. Fees for animal
hospital services are due at the time of service. For example,
in 2006 over 95% of our animal hospital services were paid at
the time of service. In addition, over the past three fiscal
years our bad debt expense has averaged only 1% of total revenue.
The practice of veterinary medicine is subject to seasonal
fluctuation. In particular, demand for veterinary services is
significantly higher during the warmer months because pets spend
a greater amount of time outdoors, where they are more likely to
be injured and are more susceptible to disease and parasites. In
addition, use of veterinary services may be affected by levels
of infestation of fleas, heartworm and ticks, and the number of
daylight hours.
Diagnostic
Laboratory Industry
Veterinarians use laboratory tests to treat animals by
diagnosing and monitoring illnesses and conditions through the
detection of substances in urine, tissue, fecal and blood
samples, and other specimens. As is the case with the physician
treating a human patient, laboratory diagnostic testing is
becoming a routine diagnostic tool used by the veterinarian.
Veterinary laboratory tests are performed primarily at
veterinary diagnostic laboratories, universities or animal
hospitals using
on-site
diagnostic equipment. For particular types of tests,
on-site
diagnostic equipment can provide more timely results than
outside laboratories, but this in-house testing requires the
animal hospital or veterinarian to purchase or lease the
equipment, maintain and calibrate the equipment periodically to
avoid testing errors, and employ trained personnel to operate
it. Conversely, veterinary diagnostic laboratories can provide a
wider range of tests than generally are available
on-site at
most animal hospitals and do not require any up-front investment
on the part of the animal hospital or veterinarian. Also,
leading veterinary diagnostic laboratories employ highly trained
individuals who specialize in the detection and diagnosis of
diseases and thus are a valuable resource for the veterinarian.
Our laboratories offer a broad spectrum of standard and
customized tests to the veterinary market, convenient sample
pick-up
times, rapid test reporting and access to professional
consulting services provided by trained specialists. Providing
the customer with this level of service at competitive prices
requires high throughput volumes due to the operating leverage
associated with the laboratory business. As a result, larger
laboratories are likely to have a competitive advantage relative
to smaller laboratories.
We believe that the outsourced laboratory testing market is
among the faster growing segments of the animal healthcare
services industry as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
the increased focus on wellness, early detection and monitoring
programs in veterinary medicine, which is increasing the overall
number of tests being performed;
|
|
|
|
the emphasis in veterinary education on diagnostic tests and the
trend toward specialization in veterinary medicine, which are
causing veterinarians to increasingly rely on tests for more
accurate diagnoses; and
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
the continued technological developments in veterinary medicine,
which are increasing the breadth of tests offered.
|
Animal
Hospital Industry
Animal healthcare services are provided predominately by the
veterinarian practicing as a sole practitioner, or as part of a
larger group practice or hospital. Veterinarians diagnose and
treat animal illnesses and injuries, perform surgeries, provide
routine medical exams and prescribe medication. Some
veterinarians specialize by type of medicine, such as
orthopedics, dentistry, ophthalmology or dermatology. Others
focus on a particular type of animal. The principal factors in a
pet owners decision as to which veterinarian to use
include convenient location and hours, recommendation of
friends, reasonable fees and quality of care.
According to the American Veterinary Medical Association, the
U.S. market for veterinary services is highly fragmented
with more than 44,000 veterinarians practicing at over
22,000 companion animal hospitals at the end of 2005.
Although most animal hospitals are single-site,
sole-practitioner facilities, we believe veterinarians are
gravitating toward larger, multi-doctor animal hospitals that
provide
state-of-the-art
facilities, treatments, methods and pharmaceuticals to enhance
the services they can provide their clients.
Well-capitalized animal hospital operators have the opportunity
to supplement their internal growth with selective acquisitions.
We believe the extremely fragmented animal hospital industry is
consolidating due to:
|
|
|
|
|
the purchasing, marketing and administrative cost advantages
that can be realized by a large, multiple location, multi-doctor
veterinary provider;
|
|
|
|
the cost of financing equipment purchases and upgrading
technology necessary for a successful practice;
|
|
|
|
the desire of veterinarians to focus on practicing veterinary
medicine, rather than spending large portions of their time
performing the administrative tasks necessary to operate an
animal hospital;
|
|
|
|
the choice of some owners of animal hospitals to diversify their
investment portfolio by selling all or a portion of their
investment in the animal hospital; and
|
|
|
|
the appeal to many veterinarians of the benefits and flexible
work schedule that is not typically available to a sole
practitioner or single-site provider.
|
Medical
Technology Industry
Veterinarians use radiography and ultrasound imaging equipment
to capture and view anatomical images to aid in the diagnosis
and treatment of a broad range of diseases and injuries in
animals. Digital radiography imaging equipment utilizes high
frequency electromagnetic waves to capture x-ray images that are
then digitized and stored in digital format. Ultrasound imaging
equipment utilizes high frequency sound waves and echoes to
display a two-dimensional image of the tissue being examined.
Veterinarians can display images created by digital radiography
and ultrasound imaging equipment on computer monitors,
manipulate the images, store them electronically and transmit in
digital format over the Internet with additional computer
hardware and software.
We believe that the use of digital radiography and ultrasound
imaging equipment provides advantages to veterinarians when
compared to other imaging equipment for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to see greater detail and manipulate images, which
assists in the diagnosis of illnesses and injuries and improves
the quality of care;
|
|
|
|
the ability to transmit images over the Internet to facilitate
consultation with a specialist;
|
|
|
|
improved efficiencies, including the ability to easily store and
retrieve images electronically; and
|
|
|
|
the reduction of costs associated with the purchasing,
processing, storing, filing and retrieving of conventional film
used by traditional x-ray equipment.
|
3
Business
Strategy
Our business strategy is to continue expanding our market
leadership in animal healthcare services through our diagnostic
laboratory, animal hospital and medical technology segments. Key
elements to our strategy include:
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalizing on our Leading Market Position to Generate
Revenue Growth. Our leading market position in
the veterinary laboratory and animal hospital markets positions
us to capitalize on favorable growth trends in the animal
healthcare services industry. In our laboratories, we seek to
generate revenue growth by taking advantage of the growing
number of outsourced diagnostic tests, the opportunities to
expand the testing that we provide and by increasing our market
share. We continually educate veterinarians on new and existing
technologies and tests available to diagnose medical conditions.
Further, we leverage the knowledge of our specialists by
providing veterinarians with extensive client support in
utilizing and understanding these diagnostic tests. In our
animal hospitals, we seek to generate revenue growth by
capitalizing on the growing emphasis on pet health and wellness.
Our medical technology segment seeks to leverage off our
strengths in the broader veterinary markets by introducing
technologies, products and services to the veterinary market. We
seek to generate revenue growth by increasing our market share
and educating veterinarians on new and existing technologies.
|
|
|
|
Leveraging Established Infrastructure to Improve
Margins. We intend to leverage our established
laboratory and animal hospital infrastructure to continue to
increase our operating margins. Due to our established networks
and the fixed cost nature of our business model, we are able to
realize high margins on incremental revenue from laboratory and
animal hospital customers. For example, given that our
nationwide transportation network servicing our laboratory
customers is a relatively fixed cost, we are able to achieve
significantly higher margins on most incremental tests ordered
by the same customer when picked up by our couriers at the same
time.
|
|
|
|
Utilizing Enterprise-Wide Information Systems to Improve
Operating Efficiencies. Our laboratory and animal
hospital operations utilize enterprise-wide management
information systems. We believe that these common systems enable
us to more effectively manage the key operating metrics that
drive our business. With the aid of these systems, we seek to
standardize pricing, expand the services our veterinarians
provide, capture unbilled services and increase volume through
targeted marketing programs.
|
|
|
|
Pursuing Selected Acquisitions. The
fragmentation of the animal hospital industry provides us with
significant expansion opportunities in our animal hospital
segment. Depending upon the attractiveness of the candidates and
the strategic fit with our existing operations, we intend to
acquire approximately 20 to 25 independent animal hospitals per
year with aggregate annual revenues of approximately
$35.0 million to $40.0 million. In addition, we also
evaluate the acquisition of animal hospital chains, laboratories
or related businesses if favorable opportunities are presented.
We intend primarily to use cash in our acquisitions but,
depending on the timing and amount of our acquisitions, we may
use stock or debt.
|
Diagnostic
Laboratories
We operate a full-service, veterinary diagnostic laboratory
network serving all 50 states. Our laboratory network
services a diverse customer base of over 15,000 clients
including animal hospitals we operate, which accounted for 9% of
total laboratory revenue in 2006.
Services
Our diagnostic spectrum includes over 300 different tests in the
area of chemistry, pathology, endocrinology, serology,
hematology and microbiology, as well as tests specific to
particular diseases. We do not conduct experiments on animals.
4
Although modified to address the particular requirements of the
species tested, the tests performed in our veterinary
laboratories are similar to those performed in human clinical
laboratories and utilize similar laboratory equipment and
technologies. We believe that the growing concern for animal
health, combined with the movement of veterinary medicine toward
increasing specialization, may result in the migration of
additional areas of human testing into the veterinary field.
Given the recent advancements in veterinary-medical technology
and the increased breadth and depth of knowledge required for
the practice of veterinary medicine, many veterinarians solicit
the knowledge and experience of our specialists to interpret
test results to aid in the diagnosis of illnesses and to suggest
possible treatment alternatives. Our diagnostic experts include
veterinarians, chemists and other scientists with expertise in
pathology, internal medicine, oncology, cardiology, dermatology,
neurology and endocrinology. Because of our specialist support,
we believe the quality of our service further distinguishes our
laboratory services as a premiere service provider.
Laboratory
Network
We operate 33 veterinary diagnostic laboratories. Our laboratory
network includes:
|
|
|
|
|
primary hubs that are open 24 hours per day and offer a
full-testing menu;
|
|
|
|
secondary laboratories that are open 24 hours per day and
offer a wide-testing menu servicing large metropolitan
areas; and
|
|
|
|
STAT laboratories that service other locations with demand
sufficient to warrant nearby laboratory facilities and are open
primarily during daytime hours.
|
We connect our laboratories to our customers with what we
believe is the industrys largest transportation network,
picking up requisitions daily through an extensive network of
drivers and independent couriers. Customers outside our
transportation network use Federal Express to send specimens to
our laboratory just outside of Memphis, Tennessee, which permits
rapid and cost-efficient testing because of the proximity to the
primary sorting facility of Federal Express.
In 2006, we derived 71% of our laboratory revenue from major
metropolitan areas, where we offer
twice-a-day
pick-up
service and
same-day
results. In addition, in these areas we generally offer to
report results within three hours of
pick-up.
Outside of these areas, we typically provide test results to
veterinarians before 8:00 a.m. the day following
pick-up.
Sales,
Marketing and Client Service
Our full-time sales and field-service representatives market
laboratory services and maintain relationships with existing
customers. Our sales force is commission-based and organized
along geographic regions. We support our sales efforts by
strengthening our industry-leading team of specialists,
developing marketing literature, attending trade shows,
participating in trade associations and providing educational
services to veterinarians. Our client-service representatives
respond to customer inquiries, provide test results and, when
appropriate, introduce the customer to other services offered by
the laboratory.
5
Animal
Hospitals
At December 31, 2006, we operated 379 animal hospitals in
37 states that were supported by over 1,300 veterinarians.
Our nationwide network of freestanding, full-service animal
hospitals has facilities located in the following states:
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
74
|
|
Texas*
|
|
|
42
|
|
Washington*
|
|
|
31
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
23
|
|
New York*
|
|
|
22
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
16
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
14
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
11
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
10
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
10
|
|
New Jersey*
|
|
|
10
|
|
Oregon*
|
|
|
10
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
9
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
9
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
8
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
8
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
8
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
8
|
|
Ohio*
|
|
|
7
|
|
North Carolina*
|
|
|
6
|
|
Alaska
|
|
|
5
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
5
|
|
Minnesota*
|
|
|
5
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
4
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
3
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
|
3
|
|
Nebraska*
|
|
|
3
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
3
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
2
|
|
Louisiana*
|
|
|
2
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
2
|
|
Alabama*
|
|
|
1
|
|
New Hampshire*
|
|
|
1
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
1
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
1
|
|
Vermont
|
|
|
1
|
|
West Virginia*
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
States with laws that prohibit corporations from providing
veterinary-medical care. In these states we provide
administrative and support services to veterinary-medical groups
pursuant to management agreements. |
We seek to provide quality care in clean, attractive facilities
that are generally open between 10 to 15 hours per day, six
to seven days per week. Our typical animal hospital:
|
|
|
|
|
is located in a 4,000 to 6,000 square-foot, freestanding
facility in an attractive location;
|
|
|
|
has annual revenue between $1.0 million and
$2.0 million;
|
|
|
|
is supported by three to five veterinarians; and
|
|
|
|
has an operating history of over ten years.
|
In addition to general medical and surgical services, we offer
specialized treatments for companion animals, including advanced
diagnostic services, internal medicine, oncology, ophthalmology,
dermatology and cardiology. We also provide pharmaceutical
products for use in the delivery of treatments by our
veterinarians and pet owners. Many of our animal hospitals offer
additional services, including grooming, bathing and boarding.
We also sell specialty pet products at our hospitals, including
pet food, vitamins, therapeutic shampoos and conditioners, flea
collars and sprays, and other accessory products.
As part of the growth strategy of our animal hospital business,
we intend to continue our selective acquisition strategy by
identifying high-quality practices where we can create
additional value through the services and scale we can provide.
Our typical candidate mirrors the profile of our existing
hospital base. Acquisitions will be used to both expand existing
markets and enter new geographical areas. We intend primarily to
use cash in our acquisitions, but we may use debt or stock to
the extent we deem appropriate.
6
Personnel
Our animal hospitals generally employ a staff of between 10 and
30 full-time-equivalent employees, depending upon the
facilitys size and customer base. The staff includes
administrative and technical-support personnel, three to five
veterinarians, a hospital manager who supervises the
day-to-day
activities of the facility, and a small office staff.
We actively recruit qualified veterinarians and technicians and
are committed to supporting continuing education for our
professional staff. We operate post-graduate teaching programs
for veterinarians at 10 of our facilities, which train
approximately 80 veterinarians each year. We believe that these
programs enhance our reputation in the veterinary profession and
further our ability to continue to recruit the most talented
veterinarians.
We seek to establish an environment that supports the
veterinarian in the delivery of quality medicine and fosters
professional growth through increased patient flow and a diverse
case mix, continuing education,
state-of-the-art
equipment and access to specialists. We believe our hospitals
offer attractive employment opportunities to veterinarians
because of our professional environment, competitive
compensation, management opportunities, employee benefits not
generally available to a sole practitioner, flexible work
schedules that accommodate personal lifestyles and the ability
to relocate to different regions of the country.
We have established a medical advisory board to support our
operations. Our advisory board, under the direction of our Chief
Medical Officer, recommends medical standards for our network of
animal hospitals and is comprised of veterinarians recognized
for their outstanding knowledge and reputations in the
veterinary field. Our advisory board members represent both the
different geographic regions in which we operate and the medical
specialties practiced by our veterinarians; and three members
are faculty members at highly-ranked veterinary colleges.
Additionally, our regional medical directors, a group of highly
experienced clinicians, are also closely involved in the
development and implementation of our medical programs.
Marketing
We primarily direct our marketing efforts toward our existing
clients through customer education efforts. We inform and
educate our clients about pet wellness and quality care through
mailings of Healthy Pet Magazine, which focuses on pet care and
wellness. We also market through targeted demographic mailings
regarding specific pet health issues and collateral health
material available at each animal hospital. With these internal
marketing programs, we seek to leverage our existing customer
base by increasing the number and intensity of the services used
during each visit. We send reminder notices to increase
awareness of the advantages of regular, comprehensive
veterinary-medical care, including preventive care such as
vaccinations, dental screening and geriatric care. We also enter
into referral arrangements with local pet shops, humane
societies and veterinarians to increase our client base. We seek
to obtain referrals from veterinarians by promoting our
specialized diagnostic and treatment capabilities to
veterinarians and veterinary practices that cannot offer their
clients these services.
Ownership
Limitations
We provide management services to certain veterinary-medical
groups in states with laws that prohibit business corporations
from providing or holding themselves out as providers of
veterinary services. At December 31, 2006, we operated 141
animal hospitals in 13 of these states. In these states, we
provide administrative and support services to the
veterinary-medical groups. Pursuant to the management
agreements, the veterinary-medical groups are each solely
responsible for all aspects of the practice of veterinary
medicine, as defined by their respective state.
Medical
Technology
We sell digital radiography and ultrasound imaging equipment and
related computer hardware, software and services, including
consulting services and training, to the veterinary market. Our
digital radiography and ultrasound imaging equipment are used by
veterinarians to capture and view anatomical images to aid in
the
7
diagnosis and treatment of a broad range of diseases and
injuries in animals. We also have developed and license VetPACS,
our proprietary software package that allows for the archival
and communication of digital images, image manipulation,
networking, case reporting and image and case transmission over
the Internet. In addition, we have mobile imaging units that
provide mobile diagnostic ultrasound imaging services to
veterinarians who do not own their own ultrasound imaging
equipment.
Digital
Radiography Imaging Equipment
We sell digital radiography imaging equipment, which is
comprised of a network of various components that we acquire
from third-party manufacturers and developers. A key component
is the amorphous silicon flat-panel x-ray detector, which we
acquire from Varian Medical Systems pursuant to a distribution
agreement entered into in July 2003, granting us exclusive
rights to sell these detectors to members and institutions in
the North American veterinary community.
Ultrasound
Imaging Equipment
We sell General Electric ultrasound imaging equipment pursuant
to an agreement entered into with General Electric in July 2001
granting us exclusive rights to sell this equipment to members
and institutions in the North American veterinary community.
Proprietary
Software
We license our proprietary software, VetPACS and TruDR. VetPACS
enables the archival and communication of digital images, image
manipulation, networking, case reporting and image and case
transmission over the Internet. TruDR allows for the capture of
digital x-ray images and transmits those images to a computer
containing VetPACS. TruDR, or similar software, is a required
component for our digital radiography imaging equipment to
function. TruDR is not applicable to ultrasound imaging
equipment sales. Our ultrasound imaging equipment is functional
without VetPACS; however, without VetPACS, or similar software,
there is no digital capability, such as electronic storage or
transmission.
Other
Services
We also provide mobile imaging, consulting, education and
training services to our customers. In addition, we sell
extended service agreements to our customers that include
technical support, product updates for software and extended
warranty coverage for a period of up to five years. The products
included in our warranty programs are generally covered by the
original equipment manufacturer and we coordinate the warranty
support between our customer and the manufacturer.
Sales
and Marketing
Our sales agents market and sell our products and services to
veterinary hospitals and universities. Our sales agents receive
a base salary and commissions based on sales. We market our
products and services through direct mail, advertisements in
trade magazines, trade shows and direct sales calls to our
intended customers.
Systems
Laboratory
We use an enterprise-wide management information system to
support our veterinary laboratories. All of our financial,
customer records and laboratory results are stored in computer
databases. Laboratory technicians and specialists are able to
electronically access test results from remote testing sites.
Our software gathers data in a data warehouse enabling us to
provide expedient results via fax or through our Internet online
resulting system.
8
Animal
Hospital
We use an enterprise-wide management information system to
support our animal hospital operations. We decide whether or not
to place newly acquired animal hospitals on this network based
on a cost-benefit analysis. In addition, a majority of our
animal hospitals utilize consistent patient
accounting/point-of-sale
software and we are able to track performance of hospitals on a
per-service, per-veterinarian and per-client basis.
Competition
Among veterinary diagnostic laboratories, we believe that
quality, price, specialist support and the time required to
deliver results are the major competitive factors. There are
many clinical laboratories that provide a broad range of
diagnostic testing services in the same markets serviced by us,
and we also face competition from several providers of
on-site
diagnostic equipment that allows veterinarians to perform
various testing.
The companion animal healthcare services industry is highly
competitive and subject to continual change in the manner in
which services are delivered and providers are selected. We
believe that the primary factors influencing a customers
selection of an animal hospital are convenient location and
hours, recommendation of friends, reasonable fees and quality of
care. Our primary competitors for our animal hospitals in most
markets are individual practitioners or small, regional
multi-clinic practices. In addition, some national companies in
the pet care industry, including the operators of super-stores,
are developing networks of animal hospitals in markets that
include our animal hospitals.
The primary competitive factors in the medical imaging equipment
industry are quality, technical capability, breadth of product
line, distribution capabilities, price and the ability to
provide quality service and support. There are many companies
that manufacture and sell digital radiography and ultrasound
imaging equipment.
Government
Regulation
Certain states have laws that prohibit business corporations
from providing, or holding themselves out as providers of,
veterinary-medical care. In these states we do not provide
veterinary services or own veterinary practices. We provide
management and other administrative services to veterinary
practices located in these states. At December 31, 2006, we
provided management services to 141 animal hospitals in
13 states under management agreements with the veterinary
practices. In three of these states, we operated a mobile
imaging service. Although we seek to structure our operations to
comply with veterinary medicine laws of each state in which we
operate, given the varying and uncertain interpretations of
these laws, we may not be in compliance with restrictions on the
corporate practice of veterinary medicine in all states. A
determination that we are in violation of applicable
restrictions on the practice of veterinary medicine in any state
in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our
operations, particularly if we were unable to restructure our
operations to comply with the requirements of that state.
In addition, all of the states in which we operate impose
various registration requirements. To fulfill these
requirements, we have registered each of our facilities with
appropriate governmental agencies and, where required, have
appointed a licensed veterinarian to act on behalf of each
facility. All veterinarians practicing in our clinics are
required to maintain valid state licenses to practice.
Our acquisitions may be subject to pre-merger or post-merger
review by governmental authorities for anti-trust and other
legal compliance. Adverse regulatory action could negatively
affect our operations through the assessment of fines or
penalties against us or the possible requirement of divestiture
of one or more of our operations.
Employees
At December 31, 2006, we had
8,000 full-time-equivalent employees, including 1,400
licensed veterinarians. At that date, none of our employees were
a party to a collective bargaining agreement with the exception
of 12 employees whom we employ as courier dispatchers and
facilities personnel in the state of New York.
9
These employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement
expiring on July 10, 2007 with the Teamsters Local Union
813.
Website
Availability of Our Reports Filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission
We maintain a website with the address
http://investor.vcaantech.com. We are not including the
information contained on our website as a part of, or
incorporating it by reference into, this annual report on
Form 10-K.
We make available free of charge through our website our annual
reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file that material with, or
furnish that material to, the SEC.
Various sections of this annual report contain forward-looking
statements, all of which are based on current expectations and
could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors
described below and through this annual report. Our actual
results may differ materially from these forward-looking
statements.
If we
are unable to effectively execute our growth strategy, we may
not achieve our desired economies of scale and our profitability
may decline.
Our success depends in part on our ability to increase our
revenues and operating income through a balanced program of
internal growth initiatives and selective acquisitions of
established animal hospitals, laboratories and related
businesses. If we cannot implement or effectively execute on
this strategy, our results of operations will be adversely
affected. Even if we effectively implement our growth strategy,
we may not achieve the economies of scale that we have
experienced in the past or that we anticipate having in the
future. Our internal growth rate may decline and could become
negative. Our laboratory internal revenue growth, adjusted for
differences in billing days, has fluctuated between 9.8% and
15.2% for each fiscal year from 2002 through 2006. Our animal
hospital same-store revenue growth, adjusted for differences in
business days, has fluctuated between 3.6% and 6.6% over the
same fiscal years. Our internal growth may continue to fluctuate
and may be below our historical rates. Any reduction in the rate
of our internal growth may cause our revenues and operating
income to decrease. Investors should not assume that our
historical growth rates are reliable indicators of results in
future periods.
Demand
for certain products and services have declined and may continue
to decline.
The frequency of visits to our animal hospitals is declining and
may continue to decline. We believe that the frequency of visits
is impacted by several trends in the industry. Demand for
pet-related products traditionally sold at animal hospitals have
become more widely available in retail stores and other channels
of distribution, including the Internet. Client visits may also
be negatively impacted as a result of preventative care and
better pet nutrition. Demand for vaccinations will be impacted
in the future as protocols for vaccinations change. Some
professionals in the industry have recommended that vaccinations
be given less frequently. Our veterinarians establish their own
vaccine protocols. Some of our veterinarians have changed their
protocols and others may change their protocols in light of
recent
and/or
future literature. If demand for retail products, vaccinations
or other veterinary services decline, the frequency of visits
may decline which may result in a reduction in revenue.
Due to
the fixed cost nature of our business, fluctuations in our
revenue could adversely affect our gross profit, operating
income and margins.
A substantial portion of our expenses, particularly rent and
personnel costs, are fixed costs and are based in part on
expectations of revenue. We may be unable to reduce spending in
a timely manner to compensate for any significant fluctuations
in our revenue. Accordingly, shortfalls in revenue may adversely
affect our gross profit, operating income and margins.
10
Any
failure in our information technology systems, disruption in our
transportation network or failure to receive supplies could
significantly increase testing turn-around time, reduce our
production capacity and otherwise disrupt our
operations.
Our laboratory operations depend on the continued and
uninterrupted performance of our information technology systems
and transportation network, including overnight delivery
services provided by Federal Express. Sustained system failures
or interruption in our transportation network could disrupt our
ability to process laboratory requisitions, perform testing,
provide test results in a timely manner
and/or bill
the appropriate party. We could lose customers and revenue as a
result of a system or transportation network failure. In
addition, any change in government regulation related to
transportation samples or specimens could also have an impact on
our business.
Our computer systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption
from a variety of sources, including telecommunications
failures, electricity brownouts or blackouts, malicious human
acts and natural disasters. Moreover, despite network security
measures, some of our servers are potentially vulnerable to
physical or electrical break-ins, computer viruses and similar
disruptive problems. Despite the precautions we have taken,
unanticipated problems affecting our systems could cause
interruptions in our information technology systems. Our
insurance policies may not adequately compensate us for any
losses that may occur due to any failures in our systems.
Our laboratory operations depend on a limited number of
employees to upgrade and maintain its customized computer
systems. If we were to lose the services of some or all of these
employees, it may be time-consuming for new employees to become
familiar with our systems, and we may experience disruptions in
service during these periods. In addition, we are currently
upgrading this system. If we experience unanticipated problems
with this upgrade, we may experience disruptions in service.
Our operations depend, in some cases, on the ability of single
source suppliers or a limited number of suppliers, to deliver
products and supplies on a timely basis. We have in the past
experienced, and may in the future experience, shortages of or
difficulties in acquiring products
and/or
supplies in the quantities and of the quality needed. Shortages
in the availability of products
and/or
supplies for an extended period of time will disrupt our ability
to deliver products and provide services in a timely manner, and
we could lose customers and revenue.
Difficulties
integrating new acquisitions may impose substantial costs and
cause other problems for us.
Our success depends on our ability to timely and
cost-effectively acquire, and integrate into our business,
additional animal hospitals and in some instances laboratories
and related businesses. In 2006, we acquired 22 animal
hospitals and three laboratories. In 2005, we acquired 68 animal
hospitals, including 46 in a single acquisition of Pets
Choice, Inc. In 2004, we acquired 85 animal hospitals, including
67 in a single acquisition of National PetCare Centers, Inc. In
addition, in 2004 we acquired a medical technology company,
which resulted in a new business segment for us. We expect to
continue our animal hospital acquisition program and if
presented with favorable opportunities, we may acquire animal
hospital chains, laboratories or related businesses. Our
expansion into new territories and new business segments create
the risk that we will be unsuccessful in the integration of the
acquired businesses that are new to our operations. Any
difficulties in the integration process could result in
increased expense, loss of customers and a decline in
profitability. In some cases, we have experienced delays and
increased costs in integrating acquired businesses, particularly
where we acquire a large number of animal hospitals in a single
region at or about the same time. We also could experience
delays in converting the systems of acquired businesses into our
systems, which could result in increased staff and payroll
expense to collect our results as well as delays in reporting
our results, both for a particular region and on a consolidated
basis. Further, the legal and business environment prevalent in
new territories and with respect to new businesses may pose
risks that we do not anticipate and adversely impact our ability
to integrate newly acquired operations. In addition, our field
management may spend a greater amount of time integrating these
new businesses and less time managing our existing businesses.
During these periods, there may be less attention directed to
marketing efforts or staffing issues, which could affect our
revenues and expenses. For all of these reasons, our historical
success in integrating acquired businesses is not
11
a reliable indicator of our ability to do so in the future. If
we are not successful in timely and cost-effectively integrating
future acquisitions, it could result in decreased revenue,
increased costs and lower margins.
We continue to face risks in connection with our acquisitions
including:
|
|
|
|
|
negative effects on our operating results;
|
|
|
|
impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
dependence on retention, hiring and training of key personnel,
including specialists; and
|
|
|
|
contingent and latent risks associated with the past operations
of, and other unanticipated problems arising in, an acquired
business.
|
The process of integration may require a disproportionate amount
of the time and attention of our management, which may distract
managements attention from its
day-to-day
responsibilities. In addition, any interruption or deterioration
in service resulting from an acquisition may result in a
customers decision to stop using us. For these reasons, we
may not realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition,
either at all or in a timely manner. If that happens and we
incur significant costs, it could have a material adverse impact
on our business.
The
significant competition in the companion animal healthcare
services industry could result in a decrease in our prices, an
increase in our acquisition costs, a loss of market share and
could materially affect our revenue and
profitability.
The companion animal healthcare services industry is highly
competitive with few barriers to entry. To compete successfully,
we may be required to reduce prices, increase our acquisition
and operating costs or take other measures that could have an
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations, margins and cash flow. In addition, if we are unable
to compete successfully, we may lose market share.
There are many clinical laboratory companies that provide a
broad range of laboratory testing services in the same markets
we service. Our largest competitor for outsourced laboratory
testing services is Idexx Laboratories, Inc.
(Indexx). Idexx currently competes in the same
markets in which we operate. In this regard, Idexx has recently
acquired additional laboratories in the markets in which we
operate and may continue its expansion, and aggressively
bundles their products and services to compete with
us. Increased competition may adversely affect our laboratory
revenues and margins. Also, Idexx and several other national
companies provide
on-site
diagnostic equipment that allows veterinarians to perform their
own laboratory tests.
Our primary competitors for our animal hospitals in most markets
are individual practitioners or small, regional, multi-clinic
practices. Also, regional pet care companies and some national
companies, including operators of super-stores, are developing
multi-regional networks of animal hospitals in markets in which
we operate. Historically, when a competing animal hospital opens
in proximity to one of our hospitals, we have reduced prices,
expanded our facility, retained additional qualified personnel,
increased our marketing efforts or taken other actions designed
to retain and expand our client base. As a result, our revenue
may decline and our costs may increase.
A significant component of our growth strategy includes the
acquisition of 20 to 25 animal hospitals per year with aggregate
annual revenues of approximately $35.0 million to
$40.0 million. The competition for animal hospital
acquisitions from small national and regional multi-clinic
companies may cause us to increase the amount we pay to acquire
additional animal hospitals and may result in fewer acquisitions
than anticipated by our growth strategy. If we are unable to
acquire a requisite number of animal hospitals annually or if
our acquisition costs increase, we may be unable to effectively
implement our growth strategy and realize anticipated economies
of scale.
Our medical technology division is a relatively new entrant in
the market for medical imaging equipment in the animal
healthcare industry. Our primary competitors are companies that
are much larger than us and have substantially greater capital,
manufacturing, marketing and research and development resources
than we do, including companies such as Siemens Medical Systems,
Philips Medical Systems and Canon Medical
12
Systems. The success of our medical technology division, in
part, is due to its focus on the veterinary market, which allows
it to differentiate its products and services to meet the unique
needs of this market. If this market receives more focused
attention from these larger competitors, we may find it
difficult to compete and as a result our revenues and operating
margins could decline. If we fail to compete successfully in
this market, the demand for our products and services would
decrease. Any reduction in demand could lead to fewer customer
orders, pricing pressures, reduced revenues, reduced margins,
reduced levels of profitability and loss of market share. These
competitive pressures could adversely affect our business and
operating results.
The
carrying value of our goodwill could be subject to impairment
write-down.
At December 31, 2006, our consolidated balance sheet
reflected $625.7 million of goodwill, which was a
substantial portion of our total assets of $972.0 million
at that date. We expect that the aggregate amount of goodwill on
our consolidated balance sheet will increase as a result of
future acquisitions. We continually evaluate whether events or
circumstances have occurred that suggest that the fair market
value of each of our reporting units is below its carrying
value. The determination that the fair market value of one of
our reporting units is less than its carrying value may result
in an impairment write-down of the goodwill for that reporting
unit. The impairment write-down would be reflected as expense
and could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations during the period in which we recognize the expense.
At December 31, 2006, we concluded that the fair values of
our reporting units exceeded their carrying values and
accordingly, as of that date, our goodwill as reflected in our
consolidated financial statements was not impaired. However, in
the future we may incur impairment charges related to the
goodwill already recorded or arising out of future acquisitions.
We
require a significant amount of cash to service our debt and
expand our business as planned.
We have, and will continue to have, a substantial amount of
debt. Our substantial amount of debt requires us to dedicate a
significant portion of our cash flow from operations to pay down
our indebtedness and related interest, thereby reducing the
funds available to use for capital expenditures, acquisitions
and general corporate purposes.
At December 31, 2006, our debt consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
$372.7 million in principal amount outstanding under our
senior term notes; and
|
|
|
|
$18.0 million in principal amount outstanding under capital
leases and other debt.
|
Our ability to make payments on our debt, and to fund
acquisitions, will depend upon our ability to generate cash in
the future. Insufficient cash flow could place us at risk of
default under our debt agreements or could prevent us from
expanding our business as planned. Our ability to generate cash
is subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our
control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from
operations, our strategy to increase operating efficiencies may
not be realized and future borrowings may not be available to us
under our senior credit facility in an amount sufficient to
enable us to service our debt or to fund our other liquidity
needs. A substantial portion of our debt is variable-rate debt
that is exposed to interest rate fluctuations. In order to meet
our debt obligations, we may need to refinance all or a portion
of our debt. We may not be able to refinance any of our debt on
commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Our
failure to satisfy covenants in our debt instruments will cause
a default under those instruments.
In addition to imposing restrictions on our business and
operations, our debt instruments include a number of covenants
relating to financial ratios and tests. Our ability to comply
with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our
control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry
conditions. The breach of any of these covenants would result in
a default under these instruments. An event of default would
permit our lenders and other debtholders to declare all amounts
borrowed from them to be due and payable, together with accrued
and unpaid interest. Moreover, these lenders and other
debtholders would have the option to terminate
13
any obligation to make further extensions of credit under these
instruments. If we are unable to repay debt to our senior
lenders, these lenders and other debtholders could proceed
against our assets.
Our
debt instruments may adversely affect our ability to run our
business.
Our substantial amount of debt, as well as the guarantees of our
subsidiaries and the security interests in our assets and those
of our subsidiaries, could impair our ability to operate our
business effectively and may limit our ability to take advantage
of business opportunities. For example, our senior credit
facility may:
|
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional funds or to obtain other
financing in the future for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, investments and general corporate
purposes;
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to dispose of our assets, create liens on our
assets or to extend credit;
|
|
|
|
make us more vulnerable to economic downturns and reduce our
flexibility in responding to changing business and economic
conditions;
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business or industry;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors with
less debt; and
|
|
|
|
restrict our ability to pay dividends, repurchase or redeem our
capital stock or debt, or merge or consolidate with another
entity.
|
The terms of our senior credit facility allow us, under
specified conditions, to incur further indebtedness, which would
heighten the foregoing risks. If compliance with our debt
obligations materially hinders our ability to operate our
business and adapt to changing industry conditions, we may lose
market share, our revenue may decline and our operating results
may suffer.
We
face numerous risks associated with our acquisition of our
medical technology division.
In October 2004, we acquired Sound Technologies, Inc.
(STI), which we now operate as our medical
technology segment. This acquisition poses numerous risks, in
addition to the risks discussed above related to difficulties
integrating new acquisitions. STI sells medical imaging
equipment and related software and services. As advanced medical
imaging equipment becomes more common in the veterinary industry
and generates more significant aggregate revenues, the
competition may increase, along with greater price and margin
pressures, demands for research and development and market
differentiation.
Our medical technology division does not manufacture the
principal products it distributes, and therefore its future
business is dependent upon distribution agreements with the
manufacturers of the equipment, the ability of those
manufacturers to produce desirable equipment and the overall
rate of new development within the industry. If the distribution
agreements terminate or are not renewed, if the manufacturers
breach their covenants under these agreements, if the equipment
manufactured by these manufacturers becomes less competitive or
if there is a general decrease in the rate of new development
within the industry, demand for our products and services would
decrease. In addition, because the products represent a
significant capital investment for our customers, an adverse
change in the economy or the current tax law could also
negatively impact the demand for these products and services.
Any reduction in demand could lead to fewer customer orders,
pricing pressures, reduced revenues, reduced margins, reduced
levels of profitability and loss of market share.
Our
use of self-insurance, self-insured retention and
high-deductible insurance programs to cover certain claims for
losses suffered and costs or expenses incurred could negatively
impact our business upon the occurrence of an uninsured
and/or
significant event.
We have adopted insurance programs of self-insurance or with
large deductible provisions with regard to certain property
risks such as earthquakes and other natural disasters. In
addition, our other insurance programs including, but not
limited to, general, professional and employment practice
liabilities, health benefits and workers compensation are
self-insured or are programs with self-insured retentions or
high-deductible
14
provisions. We self-insure and use self-insured retention or
high-deductible insurance programs when the lack of availability
and/or the
high cost of commercially available insurance products do not
render the transfer of this risk economically feasible. In the
event that the frequency of losses experienced by us increased
unexpectedly, the aggregate of such losses could materially
increase our liability and adversely affect our financial
condition, liquidity, cash flows and results of operations. In
addition, while the insurance market continues to limit the
availability of certain insurance products while increasing the
costs of such products, we will continue to evaluate the levels
of claims we include in our self-insured, self-insured retention
and/or
high-deductible insurance programs. Any increases to these
programs increase our risk of exposure and therefore increases
the risk of a possible material adverse effect on our financial
condition, liquidity, cash flows and results of operations. In
addition, we have made certain judgments as to the limits on our
existing insurance coverage that we believe are in line with
industry standards, as well as in light of economic and
availability considerations. Unforeseen catastrophic loss
scenarios could prove our limits to be inadequate, and losses
incurred in connection with the known claims we self-insure
could be substantial. Either of these circumstances could
materially adversely affect our financial and business condition.
We may
experience difficulties hiring skilled veterinarians due to
shortages that could disrupt our business.
As the pet population continues to grow, the need for skilled
veterinarians continues to increase. If we are unable to retain
an adequate number of skilled veterinarians, we may lose
customers, our revenue may decline and we may need to sell or
close animal hospitals. At December 31, 2006, there were 28
veterinary schools in the country accredited by the American
Veterinary Medical Association. These schools graduate
approximately 2,100 veterinarians per year. There is a shortage
of skilled veterinarians in some regional markets in which we
operate animal hospitals. During shortages in these regions, we
may be unable to hire enough qualified veterinarians to
adequately staff our animal hospitals, in which event we may
lose market share and our revenues and profitability may decline.
If we
fail to comply with governmental regulations applicable to our
business, various governmental agencies may impose fines,
institute litigation or preclude us from operating in certain
states.
The laws of many states prohibit business corporations from
providing, or holding themselves out as providers of,
veterinary-medical care. At December 31, 2006, we operated
141 animal hospitals in 13 states with these laws,
including 42 in Texas, 31 in Washington and 22 in New York. In
addition, our mobile imaging service also operates in states
with these laws. We may experience difficulty in expanding our
operations into other states with similar laws. Given varying
and uncertain interpretations of the veterinary laws of each
state, we may not be in compliance with restrictions on the
corporate practice of veterinary medicine in all states. A
determination that we are in violation of applicable
restrictions on the practice of veterinary medicine in any state
in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on us,
particularly if we are unable to restructure our operations to
comply with the requirements of that state.
All of the states in which we operate impose various
registration requirements. To fulfill these requirements, we
have registered each of our facilities with appropriate
governmental agencies and, where required, have appointed a
licensed veterinarian to act on behalf of each facility. All
veterinarians practicing in our clinics are required to maintain
valid state licenses to practice.
We may
have to write-off certain capitalized software development
costs.
If we are unable to realize the benefits of internally developed
software, we may be required to write-off a portion or all of
the associated capitalized costs, which may have an adverse
effect on our operating results in the period in which we incur
the write-off. We are currently in the process of internally
developing software that will be used in our animal hospitals.
Costs related directly to the software design, coding, testing
and installation are capitalized and amortized over the expected
life of the software when it is deployed.
15
The
loss of Mr. Robert Antin, our Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, could materially and adversely affect our
business.
We are dependent upon the management and leadership of our
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Robert Antin.
We have an employment contract with Mr. Antin that may be
terminated at the option of Mr. Antin. We do not maintain
any key man life insurance coverage for Mr. Antin. The loss
of Mr. Antin could materially adversely affect our business.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Our corporate headquarters and principal executive offices are
located in Los Angeles, California, in approximately
50,000 square feet of leased space. At February 21,
2007, we leased or owned facilities at 435 other locations
that house our animal hospitals, laboratories and medical
technology group. We own 82 facilities and the remainder are
leased. We believe that our real property facilities are
adequate for our current needs.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are not subject to any legal proceedings other than
ordinarily routine litigation incidental to the conduct of our
business.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders
during the fourth quarter of 2006.
16
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
|
Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under
the symbol WOOF. The following table sets forth the
range of high and low sales prices per share for our common
stock as quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 by Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
$
|
36.48
|
|
|
$
|
30.65
|
|
Third
|
|
$
|
36.57
|
|
|
$
|
30.30
|
|
Second
|
|
$
|
33.34
|
|
|
$
|
26.74
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
29.94
|
|
|
$
|
26.62
|
|
Fiscal 2005 by Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
$
|
28.67
|
|
|
$
|
23.16
|
|
Third
|
|
$
|
25.91
|
|
|
$
|
22.51
|
|
Second
|
|
$
|
25.94
|
|
|
$
|
19.58
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
21.21
|
|
|
$
|
17.42
|
|
At February 26, 2007, there were 131 holders of record
of our common stock.
17
The following graph sets forth the percentage change in
cumulative total stockholder return of our common stock from
December 31, 2001 to December 31, 2006. These periods
are compared with the cumulative returns of the NASDAQ Stock
Market (U.S. Companies) Index and the Russell 2000 Index.
The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31,
2001 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices.
The stock price performance on the following graph is not
necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
COMPARISON
OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among
VCA Antech, Inc., The NASDAQ Composite Index
And The Russell 2000 Index
|
|
|
*
|
|
$100 invested on 12/31/01 in stock
or index reinvestment of dividends.
|
Fiscal year ending December 31.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/01
|
|
|
12/02
|
|
|
12/03
|
|
|
12/04
|
|
|
12/05
|
|
|
12/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
VCA Antech, Inc.
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
123.76
|
|
|
$
|
255.61
|
|
|
$
|
322.44
|
|
|
$
|
465.35
|
|
|
$
|
531.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.)
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
71.97
|
|
|
$
|
107.18
|
|
|
$
|
117.07
|
|
|
$
|
120.50
|
|
|
$
|
137.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell 2000
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
79.52
|
|
|
$
|
117.09
|
|
|
$
|
138.55
|
|
|
$
|
144.86
|
|
|
$
|
171.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
On August 25, 2004, we effected a
two-for-one
stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend payable to
stockholders of record as of August 11, 2004. All share and
per share information included in this document have been
restated to reflect the effect of the stock dividend.
We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do
not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
In addition, our senior credit facility places limitations on
our ability to pay cash dividends in respect of our common
stock. Any future determination as to the payment of dividends
on our common stock will be restricted by these limitations,
will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will
depend on our results of operations, financial condition,
capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by the
Board of Directors, including the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, which provides that dividends are only
payable out of surplus or current net profits.
Transactions
in Our Equity Securities
For the period covered by this report, we have not engaged in
any transactions involving the sale of our unregistered equity
securities that were not disclosed in a quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
or a current report on
Form 8-K,
and neither we, nor our affiliated purchasers have purchased any
of our equity securities. We have not engaged in any sales of
registered securities for which the use of proceeds is required
to be disclosed.
18
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
Our selected consolidated financial data as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002 have
been derived from our audited financial statements, which have
been audited by KPMG LLP. The selected financial data
presented below should be read in conjunction with the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations section and our
consolidated financial statements and related notes. Our audited
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006
and 2005 and for each year in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006 are included in this annual report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statements of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory revenue
|
|
$
|
258,345
|
|
|
$
|
222,064
|
|
|
$
|
200,441
|
|
|
$
|
178,812
|
|
|
$
|
154,436
|
|
Animal hospital revenue
|
|
|
711,997
|
|
|
|
607,565
|
|
|
|
481,023
|
|
|
|
376,040
|
|
|
|
334,041
|
|
Medical technology revenue(1)
|
|
|
39,305
|
|
|
|
30,330
|
|
|
|
6,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Intercompany
|
|
|
(26,334
|
)
|
|
|
(20,293
|
)
|
|
|
(13,465
|
)
|
|
|
(10,187
|
)
|
|
|
(9,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
983,313
|
|
|
|
839,666
|
|
|
|
674,089
|
|
|
|
544,665
|
|
|
|
480,868
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
712,749
|
|
|
|
613,799
|
|
|
|
490,558
|
|
|
|
394,853
|
|
|
|
350,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
270,564
|
|
|
|
225,867
|
|
|
|
183,531
|
|
|
|
149,812
|
|
|
|
129,953
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense
|
|
|
78,020
|
|
|
|
66,185
|
|
|
|
48,257
|
|
|
|
38,702
|
|
|
|
38,597
|
|
Write-down and loss (gain) on sale
of assets
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
192,527
|
|
|
|
159,241
|
|
|
|
135,215
|
|
|
|
110,520
|
|
|
|
91,456
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
24,240
|
|
|
|
25,043
|
|
|
|
25,492
|
|
|
|
26,087
|
|
|
|
39,204
|
|
Debt retirement costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,282
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
9,118
|
|
|
|
12,840
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
and provision for income taxes
|
|
|
168,279
|
|
|
|
115,038
|
|
|
|
109,181
|
|
|
|
75,433
|
|
|
|
39,267
|
|
Minority interest in income of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
165,179
|
|
|
|
111,929
|
|
|
|
106,623
|
|
|
|
73,800
|
|
|
|
37,486
|
|
Provision for income taxes(2)
|
|
|
59,650
|
|
|
|
44,113
|
|
|
|
43,051
|
|
|
|
30,377
|
|
|
|
16,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
105,529
|
|
|
$
|
67,816
|
|
|
$
|
63,572
|
|
|
$
|
43,423
|
|
|
$
|
20,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used for computing basic
earnings per common share
|
|
|
83,198
|
|
|
|
82,439
|
|
|
|
81,794
|
|
|
|
80,480
|
|
|
|
73,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used for computing diluted
earnings per common share
|
|
|
84,882
|
|
|
|
83,996
|
|
|
|
83,361
|
|
|
|
81,746
|
|
|
|
74,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated gross margin
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
Laboratory gross margin
|
|
|
46.2
|
%
|
|
|
44.5
|
%
|
|
|
43.8
|
%
|
|
|
42.4
|
%
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
Animal hospital gross margin
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
19.7
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
Medical technology gross margin(1)
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating margin
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
Laboratory operating margin
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
|
|
34.5
|
%
|
Animal hospital operating margin
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
Medical technology operating
margin(1)
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
126,890
|
|
|
$
|
115,100
|
|
|
$
|
86,359
|
|
|
$
|
76,107
|
|
|
$
|
67,122
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
$
|
(87,732
|
)
|
|
$
|
(115,431
|
)
|
|
$
|
(149,869
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,594
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
financing activities
|
|
$
|
(52,542
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,855
|
|
|
$
|
77,237
|
|
|
$
|
(18,170
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,169
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
35,316
|
|
|
$
|
29,209
|
|
|
$
|
23,954
|
|
|
$
|
15,433
|
|
|
$
|
17,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period
end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
45,104
|
|
|
$
|
58,488
|
|
|
$
|
30,964
|
|
|
$
|
17,237
|
|
|
$
|
6,462
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
971,957
|
|
|
$
|
898,405
|
|
|
$
|
742,100
|
|
|
$
|
554,803
|
|
|
$
|
507,428
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
390,715
|
|
|
$
|
452,712
|
|
|
$
|
396,889
|
|
|
$
|
317,469
|
|
|
$
|
381,557
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
430,305
|
|
|
$
|
308,751
|
|
|
$
|
232,759
|
|
|
$
|
161,923
|
|
|
$
|
63,086
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On October 1, 2004, we acquired STI, a supplier of digital
radiography and ultrasound imaging equipment to the veterinary
industry. |
|
(2) |
|
The 2006 provision for income taxes includes a $6.8 million
tax benefit recognized in the first quarter due to the outcome
of an income tax audit that resulted in a reduction in our
estimated tax liabilities, and a $1.3 million tax
adjustment related to an increase in our estimated current tax
liabilities as of December 31, 2006 recognized in the
fourth quarter of 2006. |
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with
our consolidated financial statements provided under
Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on
Form 10-K.
We have included herein statements that constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We generally identify
forward-looking statements in this report using words like
believe, intend, expect,
estimate, may, plan,
should plan, project,
contemplate, anticipate,
predict, potential,
continue, or similar expressions. You may find some
of these statements below and elsewhere in this report. These
forward-looking statements are not historical facts and are
inherently uncertain and outside of our control. Any or all of
our forward-looking statements in this report may turn out to be
wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might
make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many
factors mentioned in our discussion in this report will be
important in determining future results. Consequently, no
forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Actual future
results may vary materially. Factors that may cause our plans,
expectations, future financial condition and results to change
are described throughout this annual report and particularly in
Risk Factors Part I, Item 1A of this
annual report on
Form 10-K.
The forward-looking information set forth in this annual
report on
Form 10-K
is as of February 27, 2007, and we undertake no duty to
update this information. Shareholders and prospective investors
can find
20
information filed with the SEC after February 27, 2007,
at our website at http://investor.vcaantech.com or at the
SECs website at www.sec.gov.
Overview
We are a leading animal healthcare services company operating in
the United States. We provide veterinary services and diagnostic
testing to support veterinary care and we sell diagnostic
imaging equipment and other medical technology products and
related services to veterinarians. We have four reportable
segments.
Our laboratory segment operates the largest network of
veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the nation. Our
laboratories provide sophisticated testing and consulting
services used by veterinarians in the detection, diagnosis,
evaluation, monitoring, treatment and prevention of diseases and
other conditions affecting animals. At December 31, 2006,
our laboratory network consisted of 33 laboratories serving all
50 states.
Our animal hospital segment operates the largest network of
freestanding, full-service animal hospitals in the nation. Our
animal hospitals offer a full range of general medical and
surgical services for companion animals. We treat diseases and
injuries, offer pharmaceutical products and perform a variety of
pet wellness programs, including health examinations, diagnostic
testing, routine vaccinations, spaying, neutering and dental
care. At December 31, 2006, our animal hospital network
consisted of 379 animal hospitals in 37 states.
Our medical technology segment sells digital radiography and
ultrasound imaging equipment, related computer hardware,
software and ancillary services.
Our corporate segment provides selling, general and
administrative support for our other segments.
The practice of veterinary medicine is subject to seasonal
fluctuation. In particular, demand for veterinary services is
significantly higher during the warmer months because pets spend
a greater amount of time outdoors where they are more likely to
be injured and are more susceptible to disease and parasites. In
addition, use of veterinary services may be affected by levels
of flea infestation, heartworm and ticks, and the number of
daylight hours.
Executive
Overview
The last several years have been marked by continued growth in
our operating segments achieved through a combination of
internal growth and acquisitions. Our laboratory internal
revenue growth, adjusted for differences in billing days, was
15.2% and 11.1% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Our animal
hospital same-store revenue growth, adjusted for differences in
business days, was 5.8% and 6.6% in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Our medical technology segment has also experienced growth
through the sale of its digital radiography imaging equipment.
Our acquisition activity for the last several years is
highlighted by the acquisition of two animal hospital chains. In
addition, we acquired a company in 2004, which we now refer to
as our medical technology segment, that supplies diagnostic
imaging equipment to the veterinary industry. These acquisitions
are further discussed below.
21
Acquisitions
Our growth strategy includes the acquisition of 20 to 25
independent animal hospitals per year with aggregate annual
revenues of approximately $35.0 million to
$40.0 million. In addition, we also evaluate the
acquisition of animal hospital chains, laboratories or related
businesses if favorable opportunities are presented. The
following table summarizes the changes in the number of
facilities operated by our laboratory and animal hospital
segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Laboratories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions relocated into our
existing laboratories
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New facilities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Animal hospitals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Acquisitions, excluding Pets
Choice and NPC(1)(2)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Pets Choice(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPC(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Acquisitions relocated into our
existing animal hospitals
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
New facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Sold or closed
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pets Choice was acquired on July 1, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
NPC was acquired on June 1, 2004. |
Acquisition
of Pets Choice, Inc.
On July 1, 2005, we acquired Pets Choice, Inc.
(Pets Choice), which operated 46 animal
hospitals located in five states as of the acquisition date.
This acquisition allowed us to expand our animal hospital
operations in five states, particularly Texas and Washington.
Our consolidated financial statements include the operating
results of Pets Choice since July 1, 2005.
The total consideration for this acquisition was
$78.9 million, consisting of: $51.1 million in cash
paid to holders of Pets Choice stock and debt;
$14.1 million in assumed debt; $9.5 million in assumed
liabilities; $2.9 million of operating leases whose terms
were in excess of market; $833,000 paid for professional and
other outside services; and $464,000 paid as part of our plan to
close the Pets Choice corporate office and terminate
certain employees.
In addition, we incurred costs of approximately
$1.2 million primarily to operate Pets Choices
corporate office, which was closed in October 2005. These costs
were expensed as incurred and are included in corporate selling,
general and administrative expense.
Acquisition
of National PetCare Centers, Inc.
On June 1, 2004, we acquired National PetCare Centers, Inc.
(NPC), which operated 67 animal hospitals located in
11 states as of the acquisition date. This acquisition
allowed us to expand our animal
22
hospital operations in nine states, particularly California and
Texas, and to expand into two new states, Oregon and Oklahoma.
The total consideration for this acquisition was
$88.8 million, consisting of: $66.2 million in cash
paid to holders of NPC stock and debt; $2.5 million in
assumed debt; $11.4 million in assumed liabilities;
$4.3 million of operating leases whose terms were in excess
of market; $2.0 million paid for professional and other
outside services; and $2.4 million paid as part of our plan
to close certain facilities and terminate certain employees.
In addition, we incurred costs of approximately
$1.4 million primarily to operate NPCs corporate
office, which was closed in September 2004. These costs were
expensed as incurred and are included in corporate selling,
general and administrative expense.
Acquisition
of Sound Technologies, Inc.
On October 1, 2004, we acquired Sound Technologies, Inc.
(STI), which is a supplier of digital radiography
and ultrasound imaging equipment and related computer hardware,
software and services to the veterinary industry. The
acquisition of STI provides us the opportunity to sell digital
imaging equipment, which we believe is an emerging and dynamic
segment within the animal healthcare industry.
The total consideration for this acquisition was
$30.9 million, consisting of: $23.9 million in cash
paid to holders of STI stock, including additional consideration
of $1.5 million paid in 2005; $1.1 million in assumed
debt; $5.5 million in assumed liabilities; and $380,000
paid for professional and other outside services.
Common
Stock Activity
On August 25, 2004, we effected a
two-for-one
stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend payable to
stockholders of record as of August 11, 2004. All share and
per share information included in this document have been
restated to reflect the effect of the stock dividend.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We believe that the application of the following accounting
policies, which are important to our financial position and
results of operations, requires significant judgments and
estimates on the part of management. For a summary of all our
accounting policies, including the accounting policies discussed
below, see Note 2., Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies, in our consolidated financial statements of this
annual report on
Form 10-K.
Revenue
Laboratory
and Animal Hospital Revenue
We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of a sales
arrangement exists, delivery of goods has occurred or services
have been rendered, the sales price or fee is fixed or
determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Medical
Technology Revenue
Our medical technology segment generates a majority of its
revenue from the sale of digital radiography imaging equipment
and ultrasound imaging equipment. We also generate revenue from:
(i) licensing software; (ii) providing technical
support and product updates related to our software, otherwise
known as maintenance; (iii) providing professional services
related to our equipment and software, including installations,
on-site
training, education services and extended warranty programs; and
(iv) providing mobile imaging services. We frequently sell
equipment and license our software in multiple element
arrangements in which the customer may choose a combination of
our products and services.
The accounting for the sale of equipment is substantially
governed by the requirements of Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 104, Revenue Recognition
(SAB No. 104), and the sale of software
licenses and related items is governed by Statement of Position
(SOP)
No. 97-2,
Software Revenue
23
Recognition (SOP No. 97-2), as amended.
The determination of the amount of software license, maintenance
and professional service revenue to be recognized in each
accounting period requires us to exercise judgment and use
estimates. In determining whether or not to recognize revenue,
we evaluate each of these criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence of an arrangement: We consider
a non-cancelable agreement signed by the customer and us to be
evidence of an arrangement.
|
|
|
|
Delivery: We consider delivery to have
occurred when the ultrasound imaging equipment is delivered. We
consider delivery to have occurred when the digital radiography
imaging equipment is delivered or accepted by the customer if
installation is required. We consider delivery to have occurred
with respect to professional services when those services are
provided or on a straight-line basis over the service contract
term, based on the nature of the service or the terms of the
contract.
|
|
|
|
Fixed or determinable fee: We assess
whether fees are fixed or determinable at the time of sale and
recognize revenue if all other revenue recognition requirements
are met. We generally consider payments that are due within six
months to be fixed or determinable based upon our successful
collection history. We only consider fees to be fixed or
determinable if they are not subject to refund or adjustment.
|
|
|
|
Collection is deemed probable: We
conduct a credit review for all significant transactions at the
time of the arrangement to determine the credit worthiness of
the customer. Collection is deemed probable if we expect that
the customer will be able to pay amounts under the arrangement
as payments become due. If we determine that collection is not
probable, we defer the revenue and recognize the revenue upon
cash collection.
|
Under the residual method prescribed by
SOP No. 98-9,
Modification of
SOP No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain
Transactions (SOP No. 98-9), in multiple
element arrangements involving software that is more than
incidental to the products and services as a whole, revenue is
recognized when vendor-specific objective evidence,
(VSOE), of fair value exists for all of the
undelivered elements in the arrangement (i.e., maintenance and
professional services), but does not exist for one or more of
the delivered elements in the arrangement (i.e., the equipment,
computer hardware or the software product). VSOE of fair value
is based on the price for those products and services when sold
separately by us or the contractual renewal rates for the
post-contract customer support services that we provide. Under
the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements
is deferred and recognized as revenue upon delivery, provided
that other revenue recognition criteria are met. If evidence of
the fair value of one or more undelivered elements does not
exist, the revenue for the entire transaction, including revenue
related to the delivered elements, is deferred and recognized,
based on the facts and circumstances, either: 1) on a
straight-line basis over the life of the post contract service
period if this is the only undelivered element, or 2) when
the last undelivered element is delivered. Each transaction
requires careful analysis to determine whether all of the
individual elements in the license transaction have been
identified, along with the fair value of each element and that
the transaction is accounted for correctly.
Digital
Radiography Imaging Equipment
We sell our digital radiography imaging equipment with multiple
elements, including hardware, software, licenses
and/or
services. We have determined that the software included in these
sales arrangements is more than incidental to the products and
services as a whole. As a result, we account for digital
radiography imaging equipment sales under
SOP No. 97-2,
as amended.
For those sales arrangements where we have determined VSOE of
fair value for all undelivered elements, we recognize the
residual revenue for the delivered elements at the time of
delivery or installation and customer acceptance.
Generally, at the time of delivery and installation of equipment
the only undelivered item is the post-contract customer support
(PCS). This obligation is contractually defined in
both terms of scope and period. When we have established VSOE of
fair value for the PCS, we recognize the revenue for these
services on a straight-line basis over the period of support and
recognize revenue for the delivered elements under the
24
residual method. When we have not established VSOE of fair value
for the PCS, we defer all revenue, including revenue for the
delivered elements, recognizing it on a straight-line basis over
the period of support.
In the third quarter of 2005, we established VSOE of fair value
for the undelivered elements for a majority of our sales
arrangements by including renewal rates in the sales contracts
for PCS. As a result, for transactions with defined renewal
rates for PCS, we began recognizing revenue on the sale of our
digital radiography imaging equipment, computer hardware and
software at the time of delivery or installation and customer
acceptance if required per the sale arrangement, and revenue
from the PCS on a straight-line basis over the term of the
support period. Prior to the third quarter of 2005, we
recognized revenue on all elements in these sales arrangements
ratably over the period of the PCS.
Ultrasound
Imaging Equipment
We sell our ultrasound imaging equipment on a stand-alone basis
and with multiple elements, including hardware, software,
licenses
and/or
services. We account for the sale of ultrasound imaging
equipment on a stand-alone basis under the requirements of
SAB No. 104, and recognize revenue upon delivery. We
account for the sale of ultrasound imaging equipment with
related computer hardware and software by bifurcating the
transaction into separate elements. We account for the
ultrasound imaging equipment under the requirements of
SAB No. 104, as the software is not deemed to be
essential to the functionality of the equipment, and account for
the computer hardware and software under the requirements of
SOP No. 97-2,
as amended. For those sales of our ultrasound imaging equipment
that include computer hardware and software, we recognize
revenue on the ultrasound imaging equipment, computer hardware
and software upon delivery, which occurs simultaneously.
Digital
Radiography And Ultrasound Imaging Equipment Sold
Together
In certain transactions we sell our ultrasound imaging equipment
and related services together with our digital radiography
imaging equipment and related services. In these transactions,
we allocate total invoice dollars to each element using a
relative fair value basis. Each element is then accounted for
pursuant to either SAB No. 104 or SOP
No. 97-2.
Other
Services
We recognize revenue on mobile imaging, consulting and education
services at the time the services have been rendered. We also
generate revenue from extended service agreements related to our
digital radiography imaging and ultrasound imaging equipment.
These extended service agreements include technical support,
product updates for software and extended warranty coverage. The
revenue for these extended service agreements is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the agreement.
Goodwill
Impairment
Our goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired
entity over the net of the amounts assigned to identifiable
assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The total amount of our
goodwill at December 31, 2006 was $625.7 million,
consisting of $95.3 million for our laboratory segment,
$511.3 million for our animal hospital segment and
$19.2 million for our medical technology segment.
Annually, or sooner if circumstances indicate an impairment may
exist, we test our goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair
market values of our laboratory, animal hospital and medical
technology reporting units to their respective net book values.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the estimated fair market
value of each of our reporting units exceeded their respective
net book value, resulting in a conclusion that none of our
goodwill for our reporting units was impaired.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS
No. 109). In accordance with SFAS No. 109,
we record deferred tax
25
liabilities and deferred tax assets, which represent taxes to be
recovered or settled in the future. We adjust our deferred tax
assets and deferred tax liabilities to reflect changes in tax
rates or other statutory tax provisions. Changes in tax rates or
other statutory provisions are recognized in the period the
change occurs.
We make judgments in assessing our ability to realize future
benefits from our deferred tax assets, which include operating
and capital loss carryforwards. As such, we have a valuation
allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets for the portion we
believe will not be realized.
We also assess differences between our probable tax bases and
the as-filed tax bases of certain assets and liabilities. At
December 31, 2005, we had contingent liabilities of
$6.8 million recorded in other liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheet related to such differences. During
the first quarter of 2006, we determined that these
contingencies no longer existed due to the outcome of an income
tax audit and recognized a tax benefit of $6.8 million.
Effective January 1, 2007, we will be required to assess
any uncertain tax positions using the recognition threshold and
measurement attributes prescribed by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48). Based on our current tax
positions, we do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to have
a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See
discussion of FIN 48 below under Recent Accounting
Pronouncements.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth components of our income
statements expressed as a percentage of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
Animal hospital
|
|
|
72.4
|
|
|
|
72.4
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
|
Medical technology
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Intercompany
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
72.5
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
|
|
|
72.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
Write-down and loss on sale of
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Debt retirement costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Minority interest in income of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Revenue
The following table summarizes our revenue (in thousands, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Laboratory
|
|
$
|
258,345
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
222,064
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
200,441
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
Animal hospital
|
|
|
711,997
|
|
|
|
72.4
|
%
|
|
|
607,565
|
|
|
|
72.4
|
%
|
|
|
481,023
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
Medical technology
|
|
|
39,305
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
30,330
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
6,090
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
29.6
|
%
|
|
|
398.0
|
%
|
Intercompany
|
|
|
(26,334
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(20,293
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(13,465
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
50.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
983,313
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
839,666
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
674,089
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory
Revenue
Laboratory revenue increased $36.3 million in 2006 as
compared to 2005, which increased $21.6 million as compared
to 2004. The components of the increase in laboratory revenue
are detailed below (in thousands, except percentages and average
price per requisition):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Comparative Analysis
|
|
|
2005 Comparative Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Laboratory Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal growth:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of requisitions(1)
|
|
|
10,993
|
|
|
|
9,453
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
9,453
|
|
|
|
8,614
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Average revenue per requisition(2)
|
|
$
|
23.27
|
|
|
$
|
23.49
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
23.49
|
|
|
$
|
23.20
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total internal revenue(1)
|
|
$
|
255,767
|
|
|
$
|
222,064
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
222,064
|
|
|
$
|
199,802
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
Billing day adjustment(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired revenue(4)
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
258,345
|
|
|
$
|
222,064
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
222,064
|
|
|
$
|
200,441
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Internal revenue and requisitions were calculated using
laboratory operating results, adjusted to exclude the operating
results of acquired laboratories for the comparable periods that
we did not own them in the prior year and adjusted for the
impact resulting from any differences in the number of billing
days in comparable periods. |
|
(2) |
|
Computed by dividing internal revenue by the number of
requisitions. |
|
(3) |
|
The 2004 billing day adjustment in the 2005 Comparative Analysis
reflects the impact of one additional billing day in 2004 as
compared to 2005. |
|
(4) |
|
Acquired revenue in the 2006 Comparative Analysis represents the
revenue of the laboratories acquired in 2006. |
The increase in requisitions from internal growth is the result
of a continued trend in veterinary medicine to focus on the
importance of laboratory diagnostic testing in the diagnosis,
early detection and treatment of diseases, and the migration of
certain tests to outside laboratories that have historically
been performed in veterinary hospitals. This trend is driven by
an increase in the number of specialists in the veterinary
industry relying on diagnostic testing, the increased focus on
diagnostic testing in veterinary schools and general increased
awareness through ongoing marketing and continuing education
programs provided by us, pharmaceutical companies and other
service providers in the industry.
The change in the average revenue per requisition is
attributable to changes in the mix, including those tests
historically performed at the veterinary hospital, type and
number of tests performed per requisition and
27
price increases. The price increases for most tests ranged from
3% to 5% in both February 2006 and February 2005.
Animal
Hospital Revenue
Animal hospital revenue increased $104.4 million in 2006 as
compared to 2005, which increased $126.5 million as
compared to 2004. The components of the increases are summarized
in the following table (in thousands, except percentages and
average price per order):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Comparative Analysis
|
|
|
2005 Comparative Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Animal Hospital
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-store facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orders(1)(2)
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
4,457
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
3,544
|
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
Average revenue per order(3)
|
|
$
|
130.17
|
|
|
$
|
121.20
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
120.23
|
|
|
$
|
110.65
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-store revenue(1)
|
|
$
|
571,577
|
|
|
$
|
540,209
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
426,072
|
|
|
$
|
399,690
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
Business day adjustment(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net acquired revenue(5)
|
|
|
140,420
|
|
|
|
65,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,493
|
|
|
|
80,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
711,997
|
|
|
$
|
607,565
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
607,565
|
|
|
$
|
481,023
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Same-store revenue and orders were calculated using animal
hospital operating results, adjusted to exclude the operating
results of newly acquired animal hospitals that we did not own
for a full 12 months from the beginning of the applicable
period and adjusted for the impact resulting from any
differences in the number of business days in the periods
presented. Same-store revenue also includes revenue generated by
customers referred from our relocated or combined animal
hospitals, including those merged upon acquisition. |
|
(2) |
|
The change in orders may not calculate exactly due to rounding. |
|
(3) |
|
Computed by dividing same-store revenue by same-store orders.
The average revenue per order may not calculate exactly due to
rounding. |
|
(4) |
|
The 2005 business day adjustment in the 2006 Comparative
Analysis reflects the impact of one additional business day in
2005 as compared to 2006. The 2004 business day adjustment in
the 2005 Comparative Analysis reflects the impact of one
additional business day in 2004 as compared to 2005. |
|
(5) |
|
Net acquired revenue represents the revenue from those animal
hospitals acquired, net of revenue from those animal hospitals
sold or closed, on or after the beginning of the comparable
period, which was January 1, 2005 for the 2006 Comparative
Analysis and January 1, 2004 for the 2005 Comparative
Analysis. Fluctuations in net acquired revenue occur due to the
volume, size and timing of acquisitions and disposals during the
periods from this date through the end of the applicable period. |
Over the last few years, some pet-related products traditionally
sold at animal hospitals have become more widely available in
retail stores and other distribution channels, and, as a result,
we have fewer customers coming to our animal hospitals solely to
purchase those items. In addition, there has been a decline in
the number of vaccinations as some recent professional
literature and research has suggested that vaccinations can be
given to pets less frequently. Our business strategy continues
to place a greater emphasis on comprehensive wellness visits and
advanced medical procedures, which typically generate
higher-priced orders. These trends have resulted in a decrease
in the number of orders and an increase in the average revenue
per order.
Price increases, which approximated 5% to 6% on most services at
most hospitals in February 2006 and February 2005, also
contributed to the increase in the average revenue per order.
Prices are reviewed on an annual basis for each hospital and
adjustments are made based on market considerations,
demographics and our costs.
28
Medical
Technology Revenue
Medical technology revenue was $39.3 million,
$30.3 million and $6.1 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. The increase in medical technology revenue was
primarily attributable to the increase in the sale of our
digital radiography imaging equipment, which was first
introduced at the end of 2004. Also contributing to the increase
in medical technology revenue was that effective July 1,
2005, we began recognizing revenue on the sale of a majority of
our digital radiography imaging equipment, computer hardware and
software at the time of delivery or installation and customer
acceptance if required, as discussed under Critical
Accounting Policies. Prior to July 1, 2005, we
recognized all elements in the sale of our digital radiography
imaging equipment ratably over the period of the post-contract
customer support services. The increase in 2005 as compared to
2004 was also due to the fact we acquired STI on October 1,
2004 and thus 2004 only included three months of operating
results.
We defer the revenue of certain transactions as discussed above
under Critical Accounting Policies. The revenue related
to these transactions is recognized ratably over a period
ranging from one to five years. At December 31, 2006, we
had deferred revenue of $10.8 million.
Intercompany
Revenue
Laboratory revenue in 2006, 2005 and 2004 included intercompany
revenue of $22.6 million, $18.5 million and
$13.5 million, respectively, that was generated by
providing laboratory services to our animal hospitals. Medical
technology revenue in 2006 and 2005 included intercompany
revenue of $3.8 million and $1.8 million,
respectively, that was generated by providing products and
services to our animal hospitals. For purposes of reviewing the
operating performance of our business segments, all intercompany
transactions are accounted for as if the transaction was with an
independent third party at current market prices. For financial
reporting purposes, intercompany transactions are eliminated as
part of our consolidation.
Gross
Profit
The following table summarizes our gross profit and our gross
profit as a percentage of applicable revenue, or gross margin
(in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Laboratory
|
|
$
|
119,449
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
98,926
|
|
|
|
44.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
87,780
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
%
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
Animal hospital
|
|
|
138,358
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
118,239
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
93,546
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
Medical technology
|
|
|
14,213
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
|
9,433
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
|
50.7
|
%
|
|
|
327.8
|
%
|
Intercompany
|
|
|
(1,456
|
)
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$
|
270,564
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
225,867
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
183,531
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory
Gross Profit
Laboratory gross profit is calculated as laboratory revenue less
laboratory direct costs. Laboratory direct costs are comprised
of all costs of laboratory services, including but not limited
to, salaries of veterinarians, specialists, technicians and
other laboratory-based personnel, facilities rent, occupancy
costs, depreciation and amortization and supply costs.
The increases in laboratory gross margin were primarily
attributable to increases in laboratory revenue combined with
operating leverage associated with our laboratory business. Our
operating leverage comes from the incremental margins we realize
on additional tests ordered by the same client, as well as when
more comprehensive tests are ordered. We are able to benefit
from these incremental margins due to the relative fixed cost
nature of our laboratory business.
29
Animal
Hospital Gross Profit
Animal hospital gross profit is calculated as animal hospital
revenue less animal hospital direct costs. Animal hospital
direct costs are comprised of all costs of services and products
at the animal hospitals, including, but not limited to, salaries
of veterinarians, technicians and all other animal
hospital-based personnel, facilities rent, occupancy costs,
supply costs, depreciation and amortization, certain marketing
and promotional expense and costs of goods sold associated with
the retail sales of pet food and pet supplies.
Over the last several years we have acquired a significant
number of animal hospitals. Many of these newly acquired animal
hospitals had lower gross margins at the time of acquisition
than those previously operated by us. These lower gross margins,
in the aggregate, have been favorably impacted subsequent to the
acquisition by improvements in animal hospital revenue,
increased operating leverage and our integration efforts.
Medical
Technology Gross Profit
Medical technology gross profit is calculated as medical
technology revenue less medical technology direct costs. Medical
technology direct costs are comprised of all product and service
costs, including, but not limited to, all costs of equipment,
related products and services, salaries of technicians, support
personnel, trainers, consultants and other non-administrative
personnel, depreciation and amortization and supply costs.
The increase in medical technology gross margin in 2006 as
compared to 2005 was primarily the result of a change in the mix
of products and services sold. Specifically, revenue from the
sale of our digital radiography imaging equipment, which has a
higher gross margin than our other products and services, has
increased as a percentage of our total medical technology
revenue.
The increase in medical technology gross profit in 2005 as
compared to 2004 was primarily due to the fact we acquired STI
on October 1, 2004 and thus 2004 only included three months
of operating results. The decrease in medical technology gross
margin in 2005 as compared to 2004 was primarily the result of a
change in the mix of products and services sold.
We defer the revenue and related costs of certain transactions
as discussed above under Critical Accounting Policies.
For these transactions, the revenue and related costs are
recognized ratably over a period ranging from one to five years.
At December 31, 2006, we had deferred revenue and costs of
$10.8 million and $5.0 million, respectively.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
The following table summarizes our selling, general and
administrative expense (SG&A), and our expense
as a percentage of applicable revenue (in thousands, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Laboratory
|
|
$
|
17,460
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
13,993
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,660
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Animal hospital
|
|
|
20,232
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
24.7
|
%
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
Medical technology
|
|
|
10,762
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
|
|
9,033
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
390.4
|
%
|
Corporate
|
|
|
29,566
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
26,935
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
20,994
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
28.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SG&A
|
|
$
|
78,020
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
66,185
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
48,257
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
37.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory
SG&A
Laboratory SG&A consists primarily of salaries of sales,
administrative and accounting personnel, selling, marketing and
promotional expense.
30
The increases in laboratory SG&A were primarily the result
of increasing our sales force and marketing efforts, commission
payments as a result of an increase in revenue and recognizing
$509,000 of share-based compensation in 2006 as a result of
adopting SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS No. 123R), on
January 1, 2006.
Animal
Hospital SG&A
Animal hospital SG&A consists primarily of salaries of field
management, certain administrative and accounting personnel,
recruiting and certain marketing expense.
The increases in animal hospital SG&A were primarily
attributable to expanding the animal hospital administrative
operations to absorb recent acquisitions and recognizing
$1.1 million of share-based compensation in 2006 as a
result of adopting SFAS No. 123R on January 1,
2006.
Medical
Technology SG&A
Medical technology SG&A consists primarily of salaries of
sales, administrative and accounting personnel, selling,
marketing and promotional expense and research and development
costs.
The increases in medical technology SG&A were primarily
attributable to increasing our sales force and administrative
support, and commission payments as a result of an increase in
revenue. The increase in medical technology SG&A in 2005 as
compared to 2004 was also due to the fact we acquired STI on
October 1, 2004 and thus 2004 only included three months of
operating results.
Corporate
SG&A
Corporate SG&A consists of administrative expense at our
headquarters, including the salaries of corporate officers,
administrative and accounting personnel, rent, accounting,
finance, legal and other professional expense and occupancy
costs as well as corporate depreciation.
In March 2004, we resolved an outstanding claim with our
insurance company related to a legal settlement and received
reimbursement of $1.9 million. As a result of acquiring
Pets Choice and NPC we incurred integration costs that
related primarily to salaries and occupancy costs for operating
the acquired companys corporate office for a period of
time subsequent to the acquisition date. The following table
reconciles corporate SG&A as reported to corporate SG&A
excluding the litigation settlement and the integration costs
(in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
Corporate SG&A:
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
29,566
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
26,935
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,994
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Impact of certain items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation settlement reimbursement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal fees reimbursement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate SG&A excluding the
impact of certain items
|
|
$
|
29,566
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,777
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
21,524
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increases in Corporate SG&A excluding the impact of
certain items were primarily the result of expanding the
corporate operations to absorb recent acquisitions. The increase
in Corporate SG&A in 2006 as compared to 2005 was also
attributable to recognizing $830,000 of share-based compensation
in 2006 as a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R on
January 1, 2006.
31
Write-Down
and Loss on Sale of Assets
In 2006, 2005 and 2004, we wrote-down and sold certain assets
for losses of $17,000, $441,000 and $59,000, respectively.
Interest
Expense, Net
The following table summarizes our interest expense, net of
interest income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior term notes
|
|
$
|
26,078
|
|
|
$
|
18,746
|
|
|
$
|
7,421
|
|
9.875% senior subordinated
notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
16,788
|
|
Interest rate hedging agreements
|
|
|
(1,542
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
Amortization of debt costs
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
Capital leases and other
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,311
|
|
|
|
27,077
|
|
|
|
26,223
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
2,034
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense, net of
interest income
|
|
$
|
24,240
|
|
|
$
|
25,043
|
|
|
$
|
25,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in interest expense were primarily attributable to
our debt refinancing transactions, which we discuss below in the
Liquidity and Capital Resources section, and changes in
LIBOR.
Debt
Retirement Costs
In connection with debt refinancing transactions, we incurred
debt retirement costs of $19.3 million and $880,000 in 2005
and 2004, respectively. These transactions are discussed below
in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section.
Other
(Income) Expense
Other (income) expense relates to non-cash gains pertaining to
the changes in the time value of our interest rate swap
agreements.
Minority
Interest in Income of Subsidiaries
Minority interest in income of subsidiaries represents our
partners proportionate share of income generated by those
subsidiaries that we do not wholly own.
Provision
for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 36.1%, 39.4% and 40.4% in 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively. The effective tax rate for 2006 as
compared to 2005 reflects a tax benefit in the amount of
$6.8 million recognized during the first quarter of 2006
due to the outcome of an income tax audit that resulted in a
reduction in our estimated tax liabilities, and a
$1.3 million tax adjustment related to an increase in our
estimated current tax liabilities as of December 31, 2006
recognized in the fourth quarter of 2006. The effective tax rate
for 2005 as compared to 2004 reflects a lower weighted-average
state statutory tax rate due to a favorable shift in the number
of facilities that we operated in states with lower tax rates or
no state income tax.
Inflation
Historically, our operations have not been materially affected
by inflation. We cannot assure that our operations will not be
affected by inflation in the future.
32
Related
Party Transactions
Transactions
with Zoasis Corporation
We incurred marketing expense for vaccine reminders and other
direct mail services provided by Zoasis, a company that is
majority owned by Robert Antin, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman. Art Antin, our Chief Operating Officer, owns a 10%
interest in Zoasis, and a separate officer sold his entire 1%
interest in Zoasis in 2004 for less than $15,000. We purchased
services of $1.9 million, $1.1 million and $946,000 in
2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The pricing of these
services is comparable to prices paid by us to independent third
parties for similar services.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes our cash flows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
126,890
|
|
|
$
|
115,100
|
|
|
$
|
86,359
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(87,732
|
)
|
|
|
(115,431
|
)
|
|
|
(149,869
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(52,542
|
)
|
|
|
27,855
|
|
|
|
77,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(13,384
|
)
|
|
|
27,524
|
|
|
|
13,727
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of year
|
|
|
58,488
|
|
|
|
30,964
|
|
|
|
17,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of year
|
|
$
|
45,104
|
|
|
$
|
58,488
|
|
|
$
|
30,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased
$11.8 million in 2006 as compared to 2005. This increase
was due primarily to improved operating performance and
acquisitions, which was partially offset by an increase in taxes
paid of $24.5 million, changes in working capital and the
adoption of SFAS No. 123R. The increase in taxes paid
was attributable to an increase in income before provision for
income taxes due primarily to improved operating performance,
acquisitions and debt retirement costs incurred in 2005. Also
contributing to the increase in taxes paid was a decrease in net
operating loss carryforwards realized in 2006 as compared to
2005. SFAS No. 123R, which we adopted on
January 1, 2006, requires the benefits of tax deductions
from the exercise of options in excess of the compensation cost
for those options to be classified as cash provided by financing
activities. As a result, we classified $6.6 million in
excess tax benefits in 2006 as a financing activity. Excess tax
benefits in periods prior to 2006 were classified as an
operating activity.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased
$28.7 million in 2005 as compared to 2004. This increase
was due primarily to improved operating performance and
acquisitions. Also contributing to the increase was a tax
benefit realized in 2005 for debt retirement costs.
Borrowings under our senior credit facility bear interest based
on a variable-rate component plus a margin of 1.50%. Significant
increases in interest rates may materially impact our operating
cash flows.
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities primarily consisted of
cash used for the acquisition of animal hospitals and
expenditures for property and equipment.
Depending upon the attractiveness of the candidates and the
strategic fit with our existing operations, we intend to acquire
approximately 20 to 25 independent animal hospitals per year for
an aggregate purchase price of approximately $35.0 million
to $40.0 million. In addition, we also evaluate the
acquisition of animal hospital chains, laboratories or related
businesses if favorable opportunities are presented. In
accordance with our strategy, we acquired 22 animal hospitals,
three laboratories and a lab-related business in 2006. In 2005,
we acquired 68 animal hospitals, which included 46 animal
hospitals acquired in connection with the
33
acquisition of Pets Choice on July 1, 2005. In 2004,
we acquired 85 animal hospitals, which included 67 animal
hospitals acquired in connection with the acquisition of NPC on
June 1, 2004, and we acquired STI, which is a supplier of
digital radiography and ultrasound imaging equipment and related
computer hardware, software and services to the veterinary
industry, on October 1, 2004. We intend to primarily use
cash in our acquisitions but, depending on the timing and amount
of our acquisitions, we may use stock or debt. In 2007, we also
intend to spend approximately $40.0 million to
$45.0 million for property and equipment.
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 2006 consisted
primarily of cash used to repay our long-term obligations,
including $60.0 million to prepay a portion of our senior
term notes. This use of cash was partially offset by a
$6.6 million excess tax benefit from the exercise of stock
options. SFAS No. 123R, which we adopted on
January 1, 2006, requires the benefits of tax deductions
from the exercise of options in excess of the compensation cost
for those options to be classified as cash provided by financing
activities. Excess tax benefits in periods prior to 2006
were classified as an operating activity.
In May 2005, we entered into a new senior credit facility that
provided $475.0 million of senior term notes and a
$75.0 million revolving credit facility. The funds borrowed
under the new senior term notes were used to retire our existing
senior term notes in the principal amount of $220.3 million
and repurchase our 9.875% senior subordinated notes in the
principal amount of $170.0 million. The new senior term
notes also provided the necessary financing to acquire
Pets Choice on July 1, 2005. In connection with the
refinancing transactions, we paid financing costs of
approximately $3.3 million and paid an aggregate tender fee
of $13.8 million to purchase the 9.875% senior
subordinated notes.
In August 2005, we used $35.0 million in cash to prepay a
portion of our senior term notes.
In June 2004, we amended and restated our senior credit facility
to replace the existing senior term notes in the principal
amount of $145.3 million with an interest rate margin of
2.50% with new senior term notes in the principal amount of
$225.0 million with an interest rate margin of 2.25%. The
additional borrowings were used to acquire NPC on June 1,
2004. In connection with this refinancing transaction, we paid
financing costs of $794,000.
In December 2004, we amended and restated our senior credit
facility to replace the existing senior term notes in the
principal amount of $223.9 million with an interest rate
margin of 2.25% with new senior term notes in the same principal
amount with an interest rate margin of 1.75%. In connection with
this transaction, we paid financing costs of $279,000.
Future
Contractual Cash Requirements
The following table sets forth the scheduled principal, interest
and other contractual cash obligations due by us for each of the
years indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
375,492
|
|
|
$
|
5,608
|
|
|
$
|
4,181
|
|
|
$
|
3,879
|
|
|
$
|
3,880
|
|
|
$
|
357,944
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
15,223
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
9,312
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
506,966
|
|
|
|
31,513
|
|
|
|
31,288
|
|
|
|
31,151
|
|
|
|
29,668
|
|
|
|
29,424
|
|
|
|
353,922
|
|
Fixed cash interest expense
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
Variable cash interest expense(1)
|
|
|
114,951
|
|
|
|
25,430
|
|
|
|
26,089
|
|
|
|
26,547
|
|
|
|
26,630
|
|
|
|
10,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swap agreements(1)
|
|
|
(2,378
|
)
|
|
|
(1,600
|
)
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
53,666
|
|
|
|
20,474
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
|
|
8,982
|
|
|
|
9,744
|
|
|
|
6,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities(2)
|
|
|
47,858
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,663
|
|
Earn-out payments(3)
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,118,757
|
|
|
$
|
84,150
|
|
|
$
|
71,832
|
|
|
$
|
72,763
|
|
|
$
|
71,972
|
|
|
$
|
405,521
|
|
|
$
|
412,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have variable-rate debt. The interest payments on our
variable-rate debt are based on a variable-rate component plus a
margin of 1.50%. For purposes of this computation, we have
assumed that the interest rate on our variable-rate debt
(including the margin of 1.50%) will be 6.9%, 7.1%, 7.3%, 7.4%,
and 7.6% for years 2007 through 2011, respectively. Our
consolidated financial statements included in this annual report
on Form 10-K
discuss these variable-rate notes in more detail. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes deferred income taxes of $39.8 million. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents contractual arrangements whereby additional cash may
be paid to former owners of acquired businesses upon attainment
of specified performance targets. |
We anticipate that our cash on-hand, net cash provided by
operations and, if needed, our revolving credit facility will
provide sufficient cash resources to fund our operations for
more than the next 12 months. If we consummate one or more
significant acquisitions during this period we may need to seek
additional debt or equity financing.
Debt
Covenants
Our senior credit facility contains certain financial covenants
pertaining to fixed charge coverage and leverage ratios. In
addition, the senior credit facility has restrictions pertaining
to capital expenditures, acquisitions and the payment of cash
dividends. As of December 31, 2006, we were in compliance
with these covenants, including the two covenant ratios, the
fixed charge coverage ratio and the leverage ratio.
The senior credit facility defines the fixed charge coverage
ratio as that ratio that is calculated on a last
12-month
basis by dividing pro forma earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as defined by the agreement, by
fixed charges. Pro forma earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization include 12 months of
operating results for businesses acquired during the period.
Fixed charges are defined as cash interest expense, scheduled
principal payments on debt obligations, capital expenditures,
and provision for income taxes. At December 31, 2006, we
had a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.75 to 1.00, which was in
compliance with the required ratio of no less than 1.20 to 1.00.
The senior credit facility defines the leverage ratio as that
ratio which is calculated as total debt divided by pro forma
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
as defined by the agreement. At December 31, 2006, we had a
leverage ratio of 1.78 to 1.00, which was in compliance with the
required ratio of no more than 3.00 to 1.00.
Interest
Rate Swap Agreements
We have interest rate swap agreements whereby we pay
counterparties amounts based on fixed interest rates and set
notional principal amounts in exchange for the receipt of
payments from the counterparties based on London Interbank Offer
Rates (LIBOR), and the same set notional principal
amounts. We entered into these interest rate swap agreements to
hedge against the risk of increasing interest rates. The
contracts effectively convert a certain amount of our
variable-rate debt under our senior credit facility to
fixed-rate debt for purposes of controlling cash paid for
interest. That amount is equal to the notional principal amount
of the interest rate swap agreements, and the fixed-rate
conversion period is equal to the terms of the contract. The
impact of these interest rate swap agreements has been factored
into the future contractual cash requirements table above. A
summary of the interest rate swap agreements existing at
December 31, 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate
|
|
4.07%
|
|
3.98%
|
|
3.94%
|
|
5.51%
|
Notional amount
|
|
$50 million
|
|
$50 million
|
|
$50 million
|
|
$50 million
|
Effective date
|
|
5/26/2005
|
|
6/2/2005
|
|
6/30/2005
|
|
6/20/2006
|
Expiration date
|
|
5/26/2008
|
|
5/31/2008
|
|
6/30/2007
|
|
6/30/2009
|
Counterparties
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
Wells Fargo
|
|
Wells Fargo
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
Qualifies for hedge accounting
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
35
In the future, we may enter into additional interest rate
strategies. However, we have not yet determined what those
strategies will be or their possible impact.
Description
of Indebtedness
Senior
Credit Facility
At December 31, 2006, we had $372.7 million principal
amount outstanding under our senior term notes and no borrowings
outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
We pay interest on our senior term notes and our revolving
credit facility based on the interest rate offered to our
administrative agent on LIBOR plus a margin of 1.50% per
annum.
The senior term notes mature in May 2011 and the revolving
credit facility matures in May 2010.
Other
Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
At December 31, 2006, we had seller notes secured by assets
of certain animal hospitals, unsecured debt and capital leases
that totaled $18.0 million.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted
SFAS No. 123R, which requires us to measure the cost
of share-based payments to employees including stock options,
based on the grant-date fair value and to recognize the cost
over the requisite service period, which is typically the
vesting period. Although the cost recognized as a result of
adopting SFAS No. 123R is non-cash, our operating
results, including our margins, net income, earnings per common
share and operating cash flows, will be negatively impacted in
future periods. See Note 8, Share-Based
Compensation, of our consolidated financial statements for a
detailed discussion of our adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements (SAB
No. 108), which requires that public companies
utilize a dual-approach to assessing the
quantitative effects of financial misstatements. This
dual-approach includes both an income statement focused
assessment and a balance sheet focused assessment. In the fourth
quarter of 2006, we adopted SAB No. 108. The adoption
of SAB No. 108 did not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48
prescribes recognition threshold and measurement attributes for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken in a tax return. FIN 48 will be effective
for our company on January 1, 2007. Based on our current
tax positions, we do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 will be
effective for our company on January 1, 2008. We are
currently evaluating the impact of adopting
SFAS No. 157 on our consolidated financial statements.
36
Quarterly
Results
The following table sets forth selected unaudited quarterly
results for the eight quarters commencing January 1, 2005
and ending December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
2005 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
Dec.
|
|
|
Sep.
|
|
|
Jun.
|
|
|
Mar.
|
|
|
Dec.
|
|
|
Sep.
|
|
|
Jun.
|
|
|
Mar.
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
242,351
|
|
|
$
|
251,632
|
|
|
$
|
255,150
|
|
|
$
|
234,180
|
|
|
$
|
216,977
|
|
|
$
|
229,242
|
|
|
$
|
206,584
|
|
|
$
|
186,863
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
61,616
|
|
|
$
|
70,465
|
|
|
$
|
74,962
|
|
|
$
|
63,521
|
|
|
$
|
51,961
|
|
|
$
|
62,644
|
|
|
$
|
60,735
|
|
|
$
|
50,527
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
40,694
|
|
|
$
|
51,516
|
|
|
$
|
55,563
|
|
|
$
|
44,754
|
|
|
$
|
33,305
|
|
|
$
|
44,135
|
|
|
$
|
45,396
|
|
|
$
|
36,405
|
|
Net income(1)(2)(3)(4)
|
|
$
|
19,340
|
|
|
$
|
26,977
|
|
|
$
|
29,553
|
|
|
$
|
29,659
|
|
|
$
|
17,051
|
|
|
$
|
22,257
|
|
|
$
|
11,262
|
|
|
$
|
17,246
|
|
Basic earnings per common
share(2)(3)(4)
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Diluted earnings per common
share(2)(3)(4)
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The quarter ended June 30, 2005 includes after-tax debt
retirement costs of $11.7 million. |
|
(2) |
|
The quarter ended December 31, 2005 includes an adjustment
to reflect changes in our weighted-average state statutory tax
rate due to a favorable shift in the number of facilities that
we operated in states with lower tax rates or no state income
tax. |
|
(3) |
|
The quarter ended March 31, 2006 includes a
$6.8 million tax benefit due to the outcome of an income
tax audit that resulted in a reduction in our estimated tax
liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
The quarter ended December 31, 2006 includes a
$1.3 million tax adjustment related to an increase in our
estimated current tax liabilities as of December 31, 2006. |
Although not readily detectable because of the impact of
acquisitions, our operations are subject to seasonal
fluctuation. In particular, our laboratory and animal hospital
revenue historically has been greater in the second and third
quarters than in the first and fourth quarters.
The demand for our veterinary services is significantly higher
during warmer months because pets spend a greater amount of time
outdoors, where they are more likely to be injured and are more
susceptible to disease and parasites. In addition, use of
veterinary services may be affected by levels of infestation of
fleas, heartworms and ticks, and the number of daylight hours. A
substantial portion of our costs for our veterinary services are
fixed and do not vary with the level of demand. Consequently,
our operating income and operating margins generally have been
higher for the second and third quarters than that experienced
in the first and fourth quarters.
37
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
At December 31, 2006, we had borrowings of
$372.7 million under our senior credit facility with
fluctuating interest rates based on market benchmarks such as
LIBOR. For our variable-rate debt, changes in interest rates
generally do not affect the fair market value, but do impact
earnings and cash flow. To reduce the risk of increasing
interest rates, we entered into the following interest rate swap
agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate
|
|
4.07%
|
|
3.98%
|
|
3.94%
|
|
5.51%
|
Notional amount
|
|
$50 million
|
|
$50 million
|
|
$50 million
|
|
$50 million
|
Effective date
|
|
5/26/2005
|
|
6/2/2005
|
|
6/30/2005
|
|
6/20/2006
|
Expiration date
|
|
5/26/2008
|
|
5/31/2008
|
|
6/30/2007
|
|
6/30/2009
|
Counterparties
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
Wells Fargo
|
|
Wells Fargo
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
Qualifies for hedge accounting
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
These interest rate swap agreements have the effect of reducing
the amount of our debt exposed to variable interest rates. For
the 12-month
period ending December 31, 2007, for every 1.0% increase in
LIBOR we will pay an additional $2.0 million in interest
expense and for every 1.0% decrease in LIBOR we will save
$2.0 million in interest expense.
We may consider entering into additional interest rate
strategies. However, we have not yet determined what those
strategies may be or their possible impact.
38
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
39
MANAGEMENTS
ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal
control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management has carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006. In performing this evaluation,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based
on our assessment of internal control over financial reporting,
our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2006,
our internal control over financial reporting was effective to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that
audited the consolidated financial statements included in this
annual report on
Form 10-K,
has issued an audit report on managements assessment of
our internal control over financial reporting.
February 27, 2007
Robert L. Antin
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Tomas W. Fuller
Chief Financial Officer,
Vice President and Secretary
40
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of VCA Antech, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
VCA Antech, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006
and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006. In connection with our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the
financial statement schedules of condensed financial information
of registrant and valuation and qualifying accounts as listed in
the index under Item 8. These consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of VCA Antech, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in
our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, in 2006.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of VCA Antech Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated February 27, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion
on managements assessment of, and the effective operation
of, internal control over financial reporting.
Los Angeles, California
February 27, 2007
41
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of VCA Antech, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting, that VCA Antech, Inc.
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). VCA Antech, Inc.s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that VCA Antech,
Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Also, in our opinion, VCA Antech, Inc. maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of VCA Antech, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity,
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and our
report dated February 27, 2007, expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Los Angeles, California
February 27, 2007
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
45,104
|
|
|
$
|
58,488
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, less
allowance for uncollectible accounts of $11,195 and $9,409 at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
44,491
|
|
|
|
37,436
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
21,420
|
|
|
|
17,856
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
13,492
|
|
|
|
9,867
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
14,935
|
|
|
|
10,972
|
|
Prepaid income taxes
|
|
|
13,523
|
|
|
|
12,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
152,965
|
|
|
|
146,956
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
166,033
|
|
|
|
143,781
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
625,748
|
|
|
|
586,444
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
16,293
|
|
|
|
10,735
|
|
Notes receivable, net
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,264
|
|
|
|
6,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
971,957
|
|
|
$
|
898,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term
obligations
|
|
$
|
6,648
|
|
|
$
|
5,884
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
23,328
|
|
|
|
20,718
|
|
Accrued payroll and related
liabilities
|
|
|
33,864
|
|
|
|
30,131
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
30,573
|
|
|
|
25,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
94,801
|
|
|
|
82,301
|
|
Long-term obligations, less
current portion
|
|
|
384,067
|
|
|
|
446,828
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
39,804
|
|
|
|
30,803
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
19,775
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
9,686
|
|
|
|
9,947
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.001,
11,000 shares authorized, none outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001,
175,000 shares authorized, 83,560 and 82,759 shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
275,013
|
|
|
|
258,402
|
|
Accumulated earnings
|
|
|
154,586
|
|
|
|
49,057
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
430,305
|
|
|
|
308,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
971,957
|
|
|
$
|
898,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
43
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
983,313
|
|
|
$
|
839,666
|
|
|
$
|
674,089
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
712,749
|
|
|
|
613,799
|
|
|
|
490,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
270,564
|
|
|
|
225,867
|
|
|
|
183,531
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense
|
|
|
78,020
|
|
|
|
66,185
|
|
|
|
48,257
|
|
Write-down and loss on sale of
assets
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
192,527
|
|
|
|
159,241
|
|
|
|
135,215
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
26,311
|
|
|
|
27,077
|
|
|
|
26,223
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
2,034
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
Debt retirement costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,282
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
and provision for income taxes
|
|
|
168,279
|
|
|
|
115,038
|
|
|
|
109,181
|
|
Minority interest in income of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
165,179
|
|
|
|
111,929
|
|
|
|
106,623
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
59,650
|
|
|
|
44,113
|
|
|
|
43,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
105,529
|
|
|
$
|
67,816
|
|
|
$
|
63,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used for computing basic
earnings per share
|
|
|
83,198
|
|
|
|
82,439
|
|
|
|
81,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used for computing diluted
earnings per share
|
|
|
84,882
|
|
|
|
83,996
|
|
|
|
83,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
81,430
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
244,271
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(82,331
|
)
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
161,923
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,572
|
|
Unrealized gain on hedging
instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
Gains on hedging instruments
reclassified to income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
Interest on notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Repayment of notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
Tax benefit from stock options
exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
82,191
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
251,412
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(18,759
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
232,759
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,816
|
|
Unrealized gain on hedging
instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
Gains on hedging instruments
reclassified to income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Repayment of notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
Tax benefit from stock options
exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
82,759
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
258,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,057
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
308,751
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,529
|
|
Unrealized loss on hedging
instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
Losses on hedging instruments
reclassified to income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Shared-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,227
|
|
Tax benefit from stock options
exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
83,560
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
275,013
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
154,586
|
|
|
$
|
622
|
|
|
$
|
430,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
45
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
105,529
|
|
|
$
|
67,816
|
|
|
$
|
63,572
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on hedging
instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
Losses (gains) on hedging
instruments reclassifed to income, net of tax
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
104,942
|
|
|
$
|
68,991
|
|
|
$
|
63,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
105,529
|
|
|
$
|
67,816
|
|
|
$
|
63,572
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
22,242
|
|
|
|
19,335
|
|
|
|
15,815
|
|
Amortization of debt costs
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
Provision for uncollectible
accounts
|
|
|
5,923
|
|
|
|
4,766
|
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
Debt retirement costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,282
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
Write-down and loss on sale of
assets
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
(6,645
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(949
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
Minority interest in income of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
Distributions to minority interest
partners
|
|
|
(3,514
|
)
|
|
|
(3,078
|
)
|
|
|
(2,188
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
7,688
|
|
|
|
8,975
|
|
|
|
7,291
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in trade accounts
receivable
|
|
|
(12,308
|
)
|
|
|
(11,335
|
)
|
|
|
(8,526
|
)
|
Increase in inventory, prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(8,594
|
)
|
|
|
(9,092
|
)
|
|
|
(2,913
|
)
|
Increase in accounts payable and
other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,907
|
|
|
|
8,404
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
Increase in accrued payroll and
related liabilities
|
|
|
3,733
|
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued
interest
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Decrease in prepaid income taxes
|
|
|
4,247
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
126,890
|
|
|
|
115,100
|
|
|
|
86,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash
acquired
|
|
|
(50,484
|
)
|
|
|
(89,149
|
)
|
|
|
(121,229
|
)
|
Real estate acquired in connection
with business acquisitions
|
|
|
(2,872
|
)
|
|
|
(2,405
|
)
|
|
|
(5,491
|
)
|
Property and equipment additions
|
|
|
(35,316
|
)
|
|
|
(29,209
|
)
|
|
|
(23,954
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
Other
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(87,732
|
)
|
|
|
(115,431
|
)
|
|
|
(149,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
47
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term
obligations, including redemption fees
|
|
|
(65,414
|
)
|
|
|
(447,100
|
)
|
|
|
(373,478
|
)
|
Proceeds from the issuance of
long-term obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
448,875
|
|
Payment of financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,257
|
)
|
|
|
(1,073
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under stock option plans
|
|
|
6,227
|
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
6,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
(52,542
|
)
|
|
|
27,855
|
|
|
|
77,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(13,384
|
)
|
|
|
27,524
|
|
|
|
13,727
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of year
|
|
|
58,488
|
|
|
|
30,964
|
|
|
|
17,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of year
|
|
$
|
45,104
|
|
|
$
|
58,488
|
|
|
$
|
30,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash
flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
25,868
|
|
|
$
|
27,802
|
|
|
$
|
25,553
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
54,521
|
|
|
$
|
30,050
|
|
|
$
|
33,500
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash
investing and financing activites:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to capital leases
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
Detail of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired
|
|
$
|
53,900
|
|
|
$
|
118,069
|
|
|
$
|
146,066
|
|
Cash paid for acquisitions
|
|
|
(50,484
|
)
|
|
|
(89,149
|
)
|
|
|
(121,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and debt assumed
|
|
$
|
3,416
|
|
|
$
|
28,920
|
|
|
$
|
24,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
48
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2006
Our company, VCA Antech, Inc. (VCA) is a Delaware
corporation formed in 1986 and is based in Los Angeles,
California. We are an animal healthcare services company with
positions in three core businesses, veterinary diagnostic
laboratories, animal hospitals and veterinary medical
technology. We refer to these segments as Laboratory, Animal
Hospital and Medical Technology, respectively.
We operate a full-service veterinary diagnostic laboratory
network serving all 50 states. Our laboratory network
provides sophisticated testing and consulting services used by
veterinarians in the detection, diagnosis, evaluation,
monitoring, treatment and prevention of diseases and other
conditions affecting animals. At December 31, 2006, we
operated 33 laboratories.
Our animal hospitals offer a full range of general medical and
surgical services for companion animals. Our animal hospitals
treat diseases and injuries, provide pharmaceutical products and
perform a variety of pet wellness programs, including health
examinations, diagnostic testing, vaccinations, spaying,
neutering and dental care. At December 31, 2006, we
operated 379 animal hospitals throughout 37 states.
Our medical technology segment sells digital radiography and
ultrasound imaging equipment, provides education and training on
the use of that equipment, and provides consulting and mobile
imaging services.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
a. Principles
of Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
our parent company, all majority-owned subsidiaries where we
have control and certain veterinary-medical groups to which we
provide services as discussed below. We have eliminated all
intercompany transactions and balances.
We provide management services to certain veterinary-medical
groups in states with laws that prohibit business corporations
from providing or holding themselves out as providers of
veterinary services. At December 31, 2006, we operated 141
animal hospitals in 13 of these states. In these states, we
provide administrative and support services to the
veterinary-medical groups. Pursuant to the management
agreements, the veterinary-medical groups are each solely
responsible for all aspects of the practice of veterinary
medicine, as defined by their respective state.
We have determined that the veterinary-medical groups are
variable interest entities as defined by Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, and that we have a variable interest in those
entities through our management agreements. We also determined
that our variable interests, in aggregate with the variable
interests held by our related parties, absorbed the majority of
the expected losses and residual returns of the
veterinary-medical groups. Based on these determinations, we
consolidated the veterinary-medical groups in our consolidated
financial statements. The result of the consolidation is an
increase in both revenue and direct costs by an equal amount,
thus there is no impact on our operating income, net income,
earnings per share or cash flows.
b. Use
of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and contingent liabilities at
the date of our consolidated financial statements and our
reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from our estimates.
49
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
c. Revenue
and Related Cost Recognition
We recognize revenue, barring other facts, when the following
revenue recognition criteria are met:
|
|
|
|
|
persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists;
|
|
|
|
delivery of goods has occurred or services have been rendered;
|
|
|
|
the sales price or fee is fixed or determinable; and,
|
|
|
|
collectibility is reasonably assured.
|
Revenue is reported net of sales discounts and excludes sales
taxes.
We generally recognize revenue and costs as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For non-contractual services provided by our laboratory, animal
hospital and medical technology business units, at the time
services are rendered.
|
|
|
|
For services provided by our medical technology business unit
under defined support and maintenance contracts, on a
straight-line basis over the contract period, recognizing costs
as incurred; these services include, but are not limited to,
technical support, product updates for software and extended
warranty coverage.
|
|
|
|
For the sale of merchandise at our animal hospitals, when
delivery of the goods has occurred.
|
|
|
|
For the sale of our digital radiography imaging equipment,
ultrasound imaging equipment, software and hardware systems at
the time title and risk of loss transfers to the customer, which
is generally upon delivery or upon installation and customer
acceptance if required per the sale arrangement. However, in
certain circumstances, we defer this revenue as discussed in the
preceding paragraphs.
|
We account for revenue in our medical technology business as
follows, depending upon the item sold:
|
|
|
|
|
Digital radiography imaging equipment and all of its related
computer equipment, our proprietary software and services in
addition to any other computers sold with our proprietary
software are accounted for under the rules of software
accounting, Statement of Position
No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. Our digital
radiography imaging equipment is accounted for under this
literature because our proprietary software is more than
incidental to the functionality of the equipment.
|
|
|
|
All other items, including the accounting for ultrasound imaging
equipment, are accounted for pursuant the general revenue
recognition rules of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
No. 104, Revenue Recognition.
|
In certain transactions we sell our ultrasound imaging equipment
and related services together with our digital radiography
imaging equipment and related services. In these transactions,
we account for each item under its respective literature and
allocate revenue using a relative fair value basis.
We defer revenue for certain transactions in our medical
technology business as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
We defer revenue for pre-paid services such as our consulting,
education services or post-contract customer support
(PCS), and recognize that revenue on a straight-line
basis over the contract period or as the services are provided
depending on the nature of the service.
|
|
|
|
We defer revenue for PCS provided as part of the purchase of
equipment and software and recognize that revenue on a
straight-line basis over the PCS period.
|
|
|
|
We defer revenue for equipment sales when we lack vender
specific objective evidence for PCS elements and recognize that
revenue on a straight-line basis over the PCS period.
|
50
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
We defer revenue when we lack persuasive evidence of a sales
agreement and recognize that revenue only when that evidence
exists.
|
|
|
|
We defer revenue on transactions where we participated in the
buyers leasing and recognize that revenue over the lease term.
|
As a result, we have deferred revenue and costs at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 consisting of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Deferred equipment revenue(1)
|
|
$
|
9,460
|
|
|
$
|
6,002
|
|
Deferred fixed-priced support or
maintenance contract revenue
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
Other deferred revenue(2)
|
|
|
2,061
|
|
|
|
1,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred revenue
|
|
|
12,374
|
|
|
|
8,764
|
|
Less current portion included in
other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,305
|
|
|
|
3,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of deferred
revenue included in other liabilities
|
|
$
|
6,069
|
|
|
$
|
4,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of deferred costs
included in prepaid expenses and other
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
$
|
1,341
|
|
Long-term portion of deferred
costs included in other assets
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred costs(3)
|
|
$
|
4,959
|
|
|
$
|
3,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents amounts billed or received for sales arrangements
that include equipment, hardware, software and PCS. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents amounts billed or received in advance for services. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents costs related to equipment, hardware and software
included in deferred equipment revenue. |
d. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We consider only highly liquid investments with original
maturities of less than 90 days to be cash equivalents. We
maintain balances in our bank accounts that are in excess of
FDIC insured levels.
e. Inventory
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost using the
first-in,
first-out method or market.
f. Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Equipment held under
capital leases is recorded at the lower of the present value of
the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the equipment at
the beginning of the lease term.
We develop and implement new software to be used internally, or
enhance our existing internal software. We develop the software
using our own employees
and/or
outside consultants. Costs associated with the development of
new software are expensed as incurred. Costs related directly to
the software design, coding, testing and installation are
capitalized and amortized over the expected life of the
software. Costs related to upgrades or enhancements of existing
systems are capitalized if the modifications result in
additional functionality.
51
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Depreciation and amortization are recognized on the
straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
5 to 40 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Lesser of lease term or
15 years
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
5 to 7 years
|
Software
|
|
3 years
|
Equipment held under capital leases
|
|
5 to 10 years
|
Depreciation and amortization expense, including the
amortization of property under capital leases, in 2006, 2005 and
2004 was $18.6 million, $16.1 million and
$13.4 million, respectively.
Property and equipment at December 31, 2006 and 2005
consisted of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
26,992
|
|
|
$
|
25,148
|
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
58,345
|
|
|
|
51,233
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
51,688
|
|
|
|
45,462
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
108,520
|
|
|
|
94,100
|
|
Software
|
|
|
10,651
|
|
|
|
9,705
|
|
Buildings held under capital leases
|
|
|
7,790
|
|
|
|
6,289
|
|
Equipment held under capital leases
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
12,894
|
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
277,198
|
|
|
|
237,086
|
|
Less accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(111,165
|
)
|
|
|
(93,305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
166,033
|
|
|
$
|
143,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization on buildings held under capital leases
amounted to $695,000 and $191,000 at December 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively, and accumulated amortization on equipment
held under capital leases amounted to $128,000 and $75,000 at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
g. Operating
Leases
Most of our facilities are under operating leases. The minimum
lease payments, including predetermined fixed escalations of the
minimum rent, are recognized as rent expense on a straight-line
basis over the lease term as defined in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 13,
Accounting for Leases. The lease term includes
contractual renewal options that are reasonably assured based on
significant leasehold improvements acquired. Any leasehold
improvement incentives paid to us by a landlord are recorded as
a reduction of rent expense over the lease term. No individual
lease is material to our operations.
h. Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity
over the net of the amounts assigned to identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, we have determined that we have three
reporting units, Laboratory, Animal Hospital and Medical
Technology, and we estimate annually, or sooner if circumstances
indicate an impairment may exist, the fair market value of each
of our reporting units and compare their estimated fair market
value against the net book value of those reporting units to
determine
52
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
if our goodwill is impaired. At December 31, 2006 and 2005,
we determined that none of our goodwill was impaired for our
reporting units.
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount
of our goodwill for 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory
|
|
|
Animal Hospital
|
|
|
Medical Equipment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
93,671
|
|
|
$
|
386,255
|
|
|
$
|
19,218
|
|
|
$
|
499,144
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,595
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
84,966
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
1,817
|
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
1,963
|
|
Goodwill related to partnership
interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
Goodwill related to sale of animal
hospitals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2005
|
|
|
94,246
|
|
|
|
473,038
|
|
|
|
19,160
|
|
|
|
586,444
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
|
38,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,595
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
Goodwill related to sale of animal
hospitals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2006
|
|
$
|
95,310
|
|
|
$
|
511,278
|
|
|
$
|
19,160
|
|
|
$
|
625,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other includes purchase price adjustments and earn-out payments. |
i. Other
Intangible Assets
In addition to goodwill, we have other amortizable intangible
assets at December 31, 2006 and 2005, as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Covenants
not-to-compete
|
|
$
|
12,687
|
|
|
$
|
(6,169
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,518
|
|
|
$
|
11,145
|
|
|
$
|
(4,970
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,175
|
|
Non-contractual customer
relationships
|
|
|
9,869
|
|
|
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
8,316
|
|
|
|
3,235
|
|
|
|
(701
|
)
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
956
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
499
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
268
|
|
Client lists
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
25,298
|
|
|
$
|
(9,005
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,293
|
|
|
$
|
17,077
|
|
|
$
|
(6,342
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization is recognized on the straight-line method over the
following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
Covenants
not-to-compete
|
|
3 to 10 years
|
Non-contractual customer
relationships
|
|
4 to 25 years
|
Technology
|
|
5 years
|
Trademarks
|
|
10 years
|
Contracts
|
|
2 to 4 years
|
Client lists
|
|
3 years
|
53
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following table summarizes our aggregate amortization
expense related to other intangible assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense
|
|
$
|
3,597
|
|
|
$
|
3,215
|
|
|
$
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated amortization expense related to intangible assets
for each of the five succeeding years and thereafter as of
December 31, 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
3,619
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
2011
|
|
|
736
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j. Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes under SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS
No. 109). In accordance with SFAS No. 109,
we record deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets,
which represent taxes to be recovered or settled in the future.
We adjust our deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities
to reflect changes in tax rates or other statutory tax
provisions. We make judgments in assessing our ability to
realize future benefits from our deferred tax assets, which
include operating and capital loss carryforwards. As such, we
have a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets for
the portion we believe will not be realized. Changes in tax
rates or other statutory provisions are recognized in the period
the change occurs.
We also assess differences between our probable tax bases and
the as-filed tax bases of certain assets and liabilities. At
December 31, 2005, we had contingent liabilities of
$6.8 million recorded in other liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheet related to such differences. During
the first quarter of 2006, we determined that these
contingencies no longer existed due to the outcome of an income
tax audit and recognized a tax benefit of $6.8 million.
Effective January 1, 2007, we will be required to assess
any uncertain tax positions using the recognition threshold and
measurement attributes prescribed by Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48). Based on our current tax positions,
we do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
See discussion of FIN 48 below under Note 2.u.,
New Accounting Standards.
k. Notes Receivable
Notes receivable are financial instruments issued in the normal
course of business and are not market traded. The amounts
recorded approximate fair value and are shown net of valuation
allowances of $58,000 and $99,000 at December 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The notes bear interest at rates varying
from 5% to 9% per annum.
54
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
l. Deferred
Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs are amortized using the effective
interest method over the life of the related debt. Accumulated
amortization of deferred financing costs was $579,000 and
$230,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
m. Fair
Value of Financial Instruments and Concentration of
Risk
The carrying amount reported in our consolidated balance sheets
for cash, cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair value because
of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial
instruments. Our policy is to place our cash and cash
equivalents in highly-rated financial instruments and
institutions, which we believe mitigates our credit risk.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable
is limited due to the diversity of our customer base. We
routinely review the collection of our accounts receivable and
maintain an allowance for potential credit losses, but
historically have not experienced any significant losses related
to an individual customer or groups of customers in a geographic
area.
Our operations depend, in some cases, on the ability of single
source suppliers or a limited number of suppliers, to deliver
products and supplies on a timely basis. We have in the past
experienced, and may in the future experience, shortages of or
difficulties in acquiring products
and/or
supplies in the quantities and of the quality needed. Shortages
in the availability of products
and/or
supplies for an extended period of time will have a negative
impact on our operating results.
n. Derivative
Instruments
We use interest rate hedging contracts to mitigate our exposure
to increasing interest rates as well as to maintain an
appropriate mix of fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. If we
determine that contracts are effective at meeting our risk
reduction and correlation criteria, we account for them using
hedge accounting. Under hedge accounting, we recognize the
effective portion of changes in the fair value of the contracts
in other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion in
earnings. If we determine that contracts do not, or no longer
meet our risk reduction and correlation criteria, we account for
them under a fair-value method recognizing changes in the fair
value in earnings in the period of change. If we determine that
a contract no longer meets our risk reduction and correlation
criteria, we recognize in earnings any accumulated balance in
other comprehensive income related to this contract in the
period of determination. For interest rate swap agreements
accounted for under hedge accounting, we assess the
effectiveness based on changes in their intrinsic value with
changes in the time value portion of the contract reflected in
earnings. All cash payments made or received under the contracts
are recognized in interest expense.
o. Marketing
and Advertising
Marketing and advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Total
marketing and advertising expense amounted to
$13.5 million, $11.2 million and $8.6 million for
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
p. Insurance
and Self-Insurance
We use a combination of insurance, high-deductible insurance and
self-insurance for a number of risks, including workers
compensation, general liability, property insurance and our
health benefits. Liabilities associated with these risks are
estimated at fair value on an undiscounted basis by considering
historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity
factors and other actuarial assumptions.
55
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
q. Debt
Retirement Costs
We have completed multiple debt refinancing transactions and
voluntary debt repayments. As a result of these transactions, we
incurred debt retirement costs of $19.3 million and
$880,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively. See Note 5.,
Long-Term Obligations, for additional information related
to these transactions. These costs for all periods presented
have been included as a component of income from operations in
the consolidated income statements.
r. Product
Warranties
We accrue the cost of basic product warranties included with the
sale of our digital radiography imaging equipment and our
ultrasound imaging equipment at the time we sell these units to
our customers. Our warranty costs are mostly for our assistance
in helping our customers resolve issues with the warranties they
have with the original equipment manufacturers. We estimate our
warranty costs based on historical warranty claim experience.
Accrued warranty costs at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were
$97,000 and $87,000, respectively.
s. Calculation
of Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share
is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding after giving effect to all
potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the
period. Basic and diluted earnings per common share was
calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
105,529
|
|
|
$
|
67,816
|
|
|
$
|
63,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
83,198
|
|
|
|
82,439
|
|
|
|
81,794
|
|
Effect of dilutive potential
common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
Contracts that may be settled in
stock or cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
84,882
|
|
|
|
83,996
|
|
|
|
83,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t. Share-Based
Compensation
Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for our share-based
payments under the intrinsic value method as prescribed in
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees. Under that method, when
options are granted with a strike price equal to or greater than
market price on date of issuance, there is no impact on earnings
either on the date of grant or thereafter, absent modification
to the options. Accordingly, we recognized no share-based
compensation expense in periods prior to January 1, 2006.
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which requires us
to measure the cost of share-based payments granted to our
employees and directors, including stock options, based on the
grant-date fair value and to recognize the cost over the
requisite service period, which is typically the vesting period.
We adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified
prospective transition method, which requires us to recognize
compensation expense for share-based payments
56
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
granted or modified on or after January 1, 2006.
Additionally, we are required to recognize compensation expense
for the fair value of unvested share-based awards at
January 1, 2006 over the remaining requisite service
period. Operating results from prior periods have not been
restated.
The adoption of SFAS No. 123R had the following impact
on our consolidated financial statements in 2006 (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory direct cost
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
Laboratory selling, general and
administrative expense
|
|
|
509
|
|
Animal hospital selling, general
and administrative expense
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
Corporate selling, general and
administrative expense
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
(1,159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net income
|
|
$
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(6,645
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
$
|
6,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we reported
all income tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock
options as a component of cash provided by operating activities
on our consolidated statements of cash flows.
SFAS No. 123R requires the benefits of tax deductions
from the exercise of options in excess of the compensation cost
for those options to be classified as cash provided by financing
activities. As such, the $6.6 million excess tax benefit
classified as a financing activity on our consolidated statement
of cash flows in 2006 would have been recognized as an operating
activity if we had not adopted SFAS No. 123R.
No share-based compensation was recognized in 2005 and 2004;
however, the following table presents net income and earnings
per common share as if we had recognized share-based
compensation using the fair-value-based method (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$
|
67,816
|
|
|
$
|
63,572
|
|
Deduct: Total share-based
compensation determined under fair-value-based method for all
awards, net of tax
|
|
|
(12,667
|
)
|
|
|
(3,231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
55,149
|
|
|
$
|
60,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
57
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
u.
|
New
Accounting Standards
|
In September 2006, the SEC issued SAB No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements (SAB No. 108), which requires
that public companies utilize a dual-approach to
assessing the quantitative effects of financial misstatements.
This dual-approach includes both an income statement focused
assessment and a balance sheet focused assessment. In the fourth
quarter of 2006, we adopted SAB No. 108. The adoption
of SAB No. 108 did not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48
prescribes recognition threshold and measurement attributes for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken in a tax return. FIN 48 will be effective
for our company on January 1, 2007. Based on our current
tax positions, we do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 will be
effective for our company on January 1, 2008. We are
currently evaluating the impact of adopting
SFAS No. 157 on our consolidated financial statements.
v. Reclassifications
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to
the 2006 financial statement presentation.
|
|
3.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
|
|
a.
|
Transactions
with Zoasis
|
We incurred marketing expense for vaccine reminders and other
direct mail services provided by Zoasis, a company that is
majority owned by Robert Antin, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman. We purchased services of $1.9 million,
$1.1 million and $946,000 for 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Art Antin, our Chief Operating Officer, owns a 10%
interest in Zoasis, and a separate officer sold his entire 1%
interest in Zoasis in 2004 for less than $15,000. We believe the
pricing of these services is comparable to prices paid by us to
independent third parties.
In 2003, we entered into an agreement with Zoasis pursuant to
which we acquired all of Zoasis right, title and interest
in and to certain software in exchange for all our preferred
stock of Zoasis then held by us. Concurrent with the purchase of
the software, we granted to Zoasis a limited royalty-free,
non-exclusive license to this software in exchange for Zoasis
providing certain support for the software. Both we and Zoasis
have a right to make modifications to the software, but all
modifications and derivative works are owned by us. The software
is hosted at our expense at a third-party hosting facility for
the benefit of both parties.
Frank Reddick joined our company as a director in February 2002
and is a partner in the law firm of Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld, LLP, or Akin. Akin provided legal
services to us during 2006, 2005 and 2004. The cost of these
legal services approximated $550,000, $1.3 million and
$1.8 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
c.
|
Registration
Rights Agreement
|
On September 20, 2000, we entered into a stockholders
agreement with each of our then stockholders, under which each
party to the stockholders agreement has registration rights. In
connection with these
58
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
registration rights, we agreed to pay any expenses associated
with any demand registrations or piggyback registrations.
In 2004, we registered the sale of common stock held by an
affiliate of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., a
significant shareholder at the time. John M. Baumer, John G.
Danhakl and Peter J. Nolan each served on our Board of Directors
at the time of the registration and are partners in Leonard
Green & Partners, L.P.
We incurred costs of $675,000 in connection with these
registrations.
Our acquisition strategy includes the acquisition of animal
hospitals. If favorable opportunities are presented, we may
pursue the acquisition of animal hospital chains, laboratories
or related businesses. In accordance with that strategy, we
acquired the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Laboratories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions relocated into our
existing laboratories
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Animal hospitals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, excluding Pets
Choice and NPC(1)(2)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Pets Choice(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPC(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Acquisitions relocated into our
existing animal hospitals
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pets Choice, Inc. (Pets Choice) was
acquired on July 1, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
National PetCare Centers, Inc. (NPC) was acquired on
June 1, 2004. |
In addition to the acquisitions listed above, we also acquired
Sound Technologies, Inc. (STI) on October 1,
2004, which is discussed below in the Sound Technologies,
Inc. section.
59
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Animal
Hospital and Laboratory Acquisitions, excluding Pets
Choice and NPC
The following table summarizes the aggregate consideration,
including acquisition costs, paid by us for our acquired animal
hospitals and laboratories, excluding NPC and Pets Choice,
and the allocation of the purchase price (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
48,388
|
|
|
$
|
34,199
|
|
|
$
|
28,338
|
|
Notes payable and other
liabilities assumed
|
|
|
5,306
|
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
53,694
|
|
|
$
|
36,834
|
|
|
$
|
29,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price
Allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
4,944
|
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
$
|
1,436
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
9,155
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
Goodwill(1)
|
|
|
39,595
|
|
|
|
32,855
|
|
|
|
26,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
53,694
|
|
|
$
|
36,834
|
|
|
$
|
29,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We expect that $34.1 million, $25.3 million and
$23.1 million of the goodwill recognized in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively, to be fully deductible for income tax
purposes. |
Pets
Choice, Inc.
On July 1, 2005, we acquired Pets Choice, which
operated 46 animal hospitals located in five states as of the
acquisition date. This acquisition allowed us to expand our
animal hospital operations in five states, particularly Texas
and Washington. Our consolidated financial statements reflect
the operating results of Pets Choice since July 1,
2005.
The total consideration for this acquisition was
$78.9 million, consisting of: $51.1 million in cash
paid to holders of Pets Choice stock and debt;
$14.1 million in assumed debt; $9.5 million in assumed
liabilities; $2.9 million of operating leases whose terms
were in excess of market; $833,000 paid for professional and
other outside services; and $464,000 paid as part of our plan to
close the Pets Choice corporate office and terminate
certain employees. The $78.9 million consideration was
allocated as follows: $57.8 million to goodwill; $266,000
to identifiable intangible assets; and $20.8 million to
tangible assets, including real estate in the amount of
$1.2 million and buildings held under capital leases of
$6.3 million. We expect that $21.8 million of the
goodwill recognized will be fully deductible for income tax
purposes.
The $266,000 of acquired identifiable intangible assets has a
weighted-average useful life of approximately 3 years. The
intangible assets that make up that amount include covenants
not-to-compete
of $5,000
(5-year
weighted-average useful life) and client lists of $261,000
(3-year
weighted-average useful life).
In addition, we incurred integration costs of $1.2 million,
which were expensed as incurred and are included in corporate
selling, general and administrative expense.
National
PetCare Centers, Inc.
On June 1, 2004, we acquired NPC, which operated 67 animal
hospitals located in 11 states as of the merger date. This
merger allowed us to expand our animal hospital operations in
nine states, particularly California and Texas, and to expand
into two new states, Oregon and Oklahoma. Our consolidated
financial statements reflect the operating results of NPC since
June 1, 2004.
60
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The total consideration for this acquisition was
$88.8 million, consisting of: $66.2 million in cash
paid to holders of NPC stock and debt; $2.5 million in
assumed debt; $11.4 million in assumed liabilities;
$4.3 million of operating leases whose terms were in excess
of market; $2.0 million paid for professional and other
outside services; and $2.4 million paid as part of our plan
to close certain facilities and terminate certain employees. The
$88.8 million consideration was allocated as follows:
$71.2 million to goodwill; $1.4 million to
identifiable intangible assets; and $16.2 million to
tangible assets, including real estate in the amount of
$5.0 million. We expect that $30.0 million of the
goodwill recognized will be fully deductible for income tax
purposes.
The $1.4 million of acquired identifiable intangible assets
have a weighted-average useful life of approximately
5 years. The intangible assets that make up that amount
include covenants
not-to-compete
of $1.3 million
(5-year
weighted-average useful life) and client lists of $155,000
(3-year
weighted-average useful life).
In addition, we incurred integration costs $1.4 million,
which were expensed as incurred and are included in corporate
selling, general and administrative expense.
Sound
Technologies, Inc.
On October 1, 2004, we acquired STI, a supplier of digital
radiography and ultrasound imaging equipment, related computer
hardware, software and services to the veterinary industry. The
acquisition of STI provides us the opportunity to sell digital
imaging equipment, which we believe is an emerging and dynamic
segment within the animal healthcare industry. Our consolidated
financial statements reflect the operating results of STI since
October 1, 2004.
The total consideration for this acquisition was
$30.9 million, consisting of: $23.9 million in cash
paid to holders of STI stock, including additional consideration
of $1.5 million paid in 2005; $1.1 million in assumed
debt; $5.5 million in assumed liabilities; and $380,000
paid for professional and other outside services. The
$30.9 million consideration was allocated as follows:
$18.8 million to goodwill; $4.7 million to
identifiable intangible assets; and $7.4 million to
tangible assets. We expect that $389,000 of the goodwill
recognized will be fully deductible for income tax purposes.
The $4.7 million of acquired identifiable intangible assets
have a weighted-average useful life of approximately
5 years. The intangible assets that make up that amount
include non-contractual customer relationships of
$1.8 million
(5-year
weighted-average useful life), technology of $1.3 million
(4-year
weighted-average useful life), covenants
not-to-compete
of $720,000
(5-year
weighted-average useful life), trademarks of $560,000
(10-year
weighted-average useful life) and contracts of $397,000
(4-year
weighted-average useful life).
Partnership Interests
We purchased the ownership interests in certain partially-owned
subsidiaries of our company from partners of these subsidiaries.
The following table summarizes the consideration paid by us and
the amount of goodwill recorded for these acquisitions (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
568
|
|
|
$
|
922
|
|
Notes payable and other
liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
709
|
|
|
$
|
846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We expect that the goodwill will be fully deductible for income
tax purposes. |
61
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Other
Acquisition Payments
We paid $2.0 million, $1.2 million and $921,000 in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, to sellers for the unused
portion of holdbacks. See Note 9.d., Holdbacks, for
additional information.
In June 2004, we paid $2.3 million to settle the remaining
obligation to a seller in connection with a prior year
acquisition.
We paid $135,000, $665,000 and $325,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, for earn-out targets that were met. We recorded
goodwill in the same amount as the earn-out payments, which we
expect will be fully deductible for tax purposes. See
Note 9.c., Earn-out Payments, for additional
information.
Long-term obligations consisted of the following at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revolving credit
|
|
Revolving line of credit, maturing
in 2010, secured by assets, variable interest rate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior term notes
|
|
Notes payable, maturing in 2011,
secured by assets, variable interest rate (weighted average
interest rate of 6.6% and 4.9% in 2006 and 2005, respectively)
|
|
|
372,668
|
|
|
|
436,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured seller notes
|
|
Notes payable, various maturities
through 2011, secured by assets and stock of certain
subsidiaries, various interest rates ranging from 7.8% to 10.0%
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured debt
|
|
Notes payable, various maturities
through 2009, various interest rates ranging from 2.0% to 9.7%
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt obligations
|
|
|
375,492
|
|
|
|
439,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
15,223
|
|
|
|
12,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,715
|
|
|
|
452,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(6,648
|
)
|
|
|
(5,884
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
384,067
|
|
|
$
|
446,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The annual aggregate scheduled maturities of our long-term
obligations for the five years subsequent to December 31,
2006 are presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
5,608
|
|
|
$
|
1,040
|
|
|
$
|
6,648
|
|
2008
|
|
|
4,181
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
5,251
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,879
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
5,023
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,880
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
5,163
|
|
2011
|
|
|
357,944
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
359,318
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,312
|
|
|
|
9,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
375,492
|
|
|
$
|
15,223
|
|
|
$
|
390,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Credit Facility
In June 2004, we amended and restated our senior credit facility
to replace the existing senior term notes in the principal
amount of $145.3 million with an interest rate margin of
2.50% with new senior term notes in the principal amount of
$225.0 million with an interest rate margin of 2.25%. The
additional borrowings were used to acquire NPC on June 1,
2004. In connection with this transaction, we paid financing
costs of $794,000 and recognized debt retirement costs of
$810,000.
In December 2004, we amended and restated our senior credit
facility to replace the existing senior term notes in the
principal amount of $223.9 million with an interest rate
margin of 2.25% with new senior term notes in the same principal
amount with an interest rate margin of 1.75%. In connection with
this transaction, we paid financing costs of $279,000 and
recognized debt retirement costs of $70,000.
In May 2005, we entered into a new senior credit facility with
various lenders for $550.0 million of senior secured credit
facilities with Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. as the
syndication agent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as the
administrative agent. The senior credit facility includes
$475.0 million of senior term notes and a
$75.0 million revolving credit facility. The funds borrowed
under the new senior term notes were used to retire our existing
senior term notes in the principal amount of $220.3 million
and our 9.875% senior subordinated notes in the principal
amount of $170.0 million. The new senior term notes also
provided the necessary financing to acquire Pets Choice on
July 1, 2005. In connection with entering into the new
senior credit facility and repaying our existing senior term
notes, we paid financing costs of $2.8 million and
recognized debt retirement costs of $2.0 million.
The new revolving credit facility allows us to borrow up to an
aggregate principal amount of $75.0 million and may be used
to borrow, on a
same-day
notice under a swing line, the lesser of $5.0 million or
the aggregate unused amount of the revolving credit facility
then in effect. At December 31, 2006, we had no borrowings
outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
Since entering into our senior credit facility in May 2005, we
have prepaid a portion of our senior term notes in 2005 and 2006
in the amount of $35.0 million and $60.0 million,
respectively.
Interest Rate on Senior Term Notes. In
general, borrowings under our senior credit facility bear
interest, at our option, on either:
|
|
|
|
|
the base rate (as defined below) plus a margin of 1.50% per
annum for the senior term notes existing from January 2004 to
June 2004, a margin of 1.25% per annum for the senior term
notes existing from June 2004 to December 2004, a margin of
0.75% per annum for the senior term notes existing from
December 2004 to May 2005 and a margin of 0.50% per annum
for the senior term notes existing since May 2005; or
|
63
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
the adjusted Eurodollar rate (as defined below) plus a margin of
2.50% per annum for the senior term notes existing from
January 2004 to June 2004, a margin of 2.25% per annum for
the senior term notes existing from June 2004 to December 2004,
a margin of 1.75% per annum for the senior term notes
existing from December 2004 to May 2005 and a margin of
1.50% per annum for the senior term notes existing since
May 2005.
|
Interest Rate on Revolving Credit Facility. In
general, borrowings under our revolving credit facility bear
interest, at our option, on either:
|
|
|
|
|
the base rate (as defined below) plus a margin, as defined in
the senior credit facility based on our leverage ratio, ranging
from 1.00% to 2.25% per annum for the revolving credit
facility existing from January 2004 to December 2004, a margin
of 0.50% per annum for the revolving credit facility
existing from December 2004 to December 2006; or
|
|
|
|
the adjusted Eurodollar rate (as defined below) plus a margin,
as defined in the senior credit facility based on our leverage
ratio, ranging from 2.00% to 3.25% per annum for the
revolving credit facility existing from January 2004 to December
2004, a margin of 1.50% per annum for the revolving credit
facility existing from December 2004 to December 2006.
|
Swing line borrowings bear interest at the base rate (as defined
below), plus the same margin applicable to the revolving credit
facility (as detailed above).
The base rate is the higher of (a) Wells Fargos prime
rate or (b) the Federal funds rate plus 0.5%. The adjusted
Eurodollar rate is defined as the rate per annum obtained by
dividing (1) the rate of interest offered to Wells Fargo on
the London interbank market by (2) a percentage equal to
100% minus the stated maximum rate of all reserve requirements
applicable to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System in
respect of Eurocurrency liabilities.
The revolving credit facility has a commitment fee equal to
0.50% per annum on the unused portion of the commitment or
0.375% per annum when the unused commitment is less than or
equal to 50.0%.
Maturity and Principal Payments. The revolving
credit facility matures on May 16, 2010. The senior term
notes mature on May 16, 2011. Principal payments on the
revolving credit facility are made at our discretion with the
entire unpaid amount due at maturity. The remaining principal
payments on the senior term notes are paid quarterly with the
annual aggregate scheduled maturities as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Senior term notes
|
|
$
|
3,793
|
|
|
$
|
3,793
|
|
|
$
|
3,793
|
|
|
$
|
3,793
|
|
|
$
|
357,496
|
|
Pursuant to the terms of the senior credit facility, mandatory
prepayments are due on the senior term notes equal to 75% of any
excess cash flow at the end of each fiscal year. Excess cash
flow is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization less voluntary and scheduled debt repayments,
capital expenditures, interest payable in cash, taxes payable in
cash and cash paid for acquisitions. These payments reduce on a
pro rata basis the remaining scheduled principal payments. At
December 31, 2006, we determined that our excess cash flow
did not exceed the defined amount. All outstanding indebtedness
under the senior credit facility may be voluntarily prepaid in
whole or in part without premium or penalty.
Guarantees and Security. We and each of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries guarantee the outstanding debt under
the senior credit facility. These borrowings, along with the
guarantees of the subsidiaries, are further secured by
substantially all of our consolidated assets. In addition, these
borrowings are secured by a pledge of substantially all of the
capital stock, or similar equity interests, of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries.
Debt Covenants. The senior credit facility
contains certain financial covenants pertaining to fixed charge
coverage and leverage ratios. In addition, the senior credit
facility has restrictions pertaining to capital expenditures,
acquisitions and the payment of cash dividends on all classes of
stock. At December 31, 2006,
64
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
we had a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.75 to 1.00, which was
in compliance with the required ratio of no less than 1.20 to
1.00, and a leverage ratio of 1.78 to 1.00, which was in
compliance with the required ratio of no more than 3.00 to 1.00.
9.875% Senior
Subordinated Notes
At January 1, 2004, we had $170.0 million in principal
amount of 9.875% senior subordinated notes due 2009 with Chase
Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.
In May 2005, we redeemed $170.0 million, the entire
principal amount, of our 9.875% senior subordinated notes.
In connection with prepaying our 9.875% senior subordinated
notes, we paid financing costs and a tender fee of $505,000 and
$13.8 million, respectively, and recognized debt retirement
costs of $17.3 million.
Interest Rate. Interest was payable
semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1.
Interest was computed on the basis of a
360-day year
comprised of twelve
30-day
months at the rate of 9.875% per annum.
Guarantee. The 9.875% senior subordinated
notes were general, unsecured obligations owed by us. They were
subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future debt
incurred under the senior credit facility. They were
unconditionally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by us
and our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Fair
Value of Our Debt
We believe the carrying value of our fixed-rate long-term debt
is a reasonable estimate of fair value. We also believe the
carrying value of our variable-rate long-term debt is a
reasonable estimate of fair value due to the fact the interest
rate resets periodically.
Interest
Rate Swap Agreements
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements whereby we
pay to the counterparties amounts based on fixed interest rates
and set notional principal amounts in exchange for the receipt
of payments from counterparties based on current LIBOR and the
same set notional principal amounts. A summary of these
agreements is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
|
|
Fixed interest rate
|
|
2.22%
|
|
1.72%
|
|
1.51%
|
|
4.07%
|
|
3.98%
|
|
3.94%
|
|
5.51%
|
Notional amount
|
|
$40 million
|
|
$20 million
|
|
$20 million
|
|
$50 million
|
|
$50 million
|
|
$50 million
|
|
$50 million
|
Effective date
|
|
11/29/2002
|
|
5/30/2003
|
|
5/30/2003
|
|
5/26/2005
|
|
6/2/2005
|
|
6/30/2005
|
|
6/20/2006
|
Expiration date
|
|
11/29/2004
|
|
5/31/2005
|
|
5/31/2005
|
|
5/26/2008
|
|
5/31/2008
|
|
6/30/2007
|
|
6/30/2009
|
Counterparties
|
|
Wells Fargo
|
|
Wells Fargo
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
Wells Fargo
|
|
Wells Fargo
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
Qualifies for hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accounting(1)
|
|
No
|
|
No
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The interest rate swap agreements with a fixed interest rate of
2.22% and 1.72% were no longer considered effective as of May
2003 and March 2004, respectively. These interest rate swap
agreements were initially considered to be cash flow hedging
instruments; however, we later determined that they were no
longer effective tools for mitigating interest rate risk within
an acceptable degree of variance because the current interest
rate environment was materially different than our projections
at the inception of the contracts. As a result of this
determination, these interest rate swap agreements no longer
qualified for hedge accounting. |
65
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following table summarizes cash received or cash paid and
unrealized gains or losses recognized as a result of our
interest rate swap agreements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cash (received) paid(1)
|
|
$
|
(1,542
|
)
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
Recognized (gain) loss(2)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
(122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These payments are included in interest expense in our
consolidated income statements. |
|
(2) |
|
These recognized gains are included in other income in our
consolidated income statements. |
The valuation of our interest rate swap agreements was
determined by the counterparties based on fair market valuations
for similar agreements. The fair market value of our interest
rate swap agreements and the classification of those amounts in
our consolidated balance sheets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
$
|
1,863
|
|
|
$
|
2,236
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,260
|
|
|
$
|
2,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes
the issuance of up to 11,000,000 shares of preferred stock
with a par value of $0.001 per share. At December 31,
2006 and 2005, we had no preferred stock outstanding.
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes
the issuance of up to 175,000,000 shares of common stock
with a par value of $0.001 per share. At December 31, 2006
and 2005, we had 83,559,577 and 82,758,934, respectively, common
shares outstanding.
Dividends
On August 25, 2004, we effected a
two-for-one
stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend payable to
stockholders of record as of August 11, 2004. All share and
per share information included in this document have been
restated to reflect the effect of the stock dividend.
We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock and we do
not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
In addition, our senior credit facility places limitations on
our ability to pay cash dividends or make other distributions in
respect of our common stock. Any future determination as to the
payment of dividends will depend on our results of operations,
financial condition, capital requirements and other factors
deemed relevant by our Board of Directors, including the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which provides that
dividends are only payable out of surplus or current net profits.
|
|
8.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
Stock
Incentive Plans
At December 31, 2006, there were 5,289,763 shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options
granted under our existing stock incentive plans. We maintain
three plans, the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan and the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (2006
Plan). New options
66
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
and other stock awards may only be granted under the 2006 Plan.
The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that may
be issued under the 2006 Plan to our employees, directors,
consultants and those of our affiliates is
(a) 6,490,412 shares of common stock; plus
(b) any shares of common stock underlying prior outstanding
options that expire, are forfeited, cancelled or terminate for
any reason without having been exercised in full. At
December 31, 2006, all of these shares were available for
grant. Outstanding options granted under our plans typically
vest over periods that range from two to four years and expire
between seven and ten years from the date of grant.
Stock
Option Activity
A summary of our stock option activity for 2006 is as follows
(in thousands, except weighted-average exercise price and
weighted-average remaining contractual term):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
6,090
|
|
|
$
|
14.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
30.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
|
|
7.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Canceled
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
16.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
5,290
|
|
|
$
|
15.72
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
87,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
4,387
|
|
|
$
|
15.54
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
73,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to vest at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
$
|
16.59
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
13,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of our stock options
granted during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $10.97, $9.46 and $6.00,
respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of our stock options
exercised during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $19.0 million,
$9.6 million and $10.5 million, respectively. The
actual tax benefit realized on options exercised during 2006,
2005 and 2004 was $7.3 million, $3.8 million and
$4.2 million, respectively. The total fair value of options
vested during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $3.2 million,
$22.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes information about the options
outstanding at December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except
per share amounts and the weighted avg. remaining contractual
life):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$0.50
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
$6.26 - $7.97
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
$
|
7.01
|
|
$15.33 - $30.70
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
20.14
|
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
$
|
21.11
|
|
At December 31, 2006, there was $3.3 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to our stock options.
This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.8 years.
67
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Calculation
of Fair Value
The fair value of our options is estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We amortize the
fair value of our options on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period. The following assumptions were used to
determine the fair value of those options granted during 2006,
2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Expected volatility(1)
|
|
35.5%
|
|
37.8% to 39.6%
|
|
32.0% to 33.0%
|
Weighted-average volatility(1)
|
|
35.5%
|
|
37.9%
|
|
32.5%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
Expected term(2)
|
|
4.3 years
|
|
5.2 years
|
|
4.8 years
|
Risk-free rate(3)
|
|
5.0%
|
|
3.9% to 4.3%
|
|
2.7% to 3.5%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We estimate the volatility of our common stock on the date of
grant based on historical volatility. |
|
(2) |
|
The expected term represents the period of time that we expect
the options to be outstanding. We estimated the expected term
based on the simplified method permitted under SAB No. 107. |
|
(3) |
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield in
effect at the time of option grant on U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon issues with equivalent remaining terms. |
We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option
forfeitures. We recognize share-based compensation only for
those awards that we expect to vest.
|
|
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
We operate many of our animal hospitals from premises that are
leased under operating leases with terms, including renewal
options, ranging from five to 35 years. Certain leases
include fair-value purchase options that can be exercised at our
discretion at various times within the lease terms.
The future minimum lease payments on operating leases at
December 31, 2006, including renewal option periods, are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
31,513
|
|
2008
|
|
|
31,288
|
|
2009
|
|
|
31,151
|
|
2010
|
|
|
29,668
|
|
2011
|
|
|
29,424
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
353,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
506,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense totaled $32.0 million, $27.5 million and
$21.1 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Rental
income totaled $761,000, $546,000 and $428,000 in 2006, 2005,
and 2004, respectively.
Under the terms of certain purchase agreements, we have
aggregate commitments to purchase approximately
$53.7 million of products and services through 2011.
68
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
We have contractual arrangements in connection with certain
acquisitions, whereby additional cash may be paid to former
owners of acquired companies upon attainment of specified
financial criteria as set forth in the respective agreements.
The amount to be paid cannot be determined until the earn-out
periods expire and the attainment of criteria is established. If
the specified financial criteria are attained, we will be
obligated to pay an additional $413,000.
d. Holdbacks
In connection with certain acquisitions, we withheld a portion
of the purchase price, or the holdback, as security for
indemnification obligations of the sellers under the acquisition
agreement. The amounts withheld are typically payable within a
12-month
period. The total outstanding holdbacks at December 31,
2006 and 2005 were $1.6 million and $1.8 million,
respectively, and are included in other accrued liabilities.
|
|
e.
|
Officers
Compensation
|
Each of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer has entered into employment agreements
with our company. The agreements provide for a base salary and
annual bonuses set by our Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors.
As of any given date, unless any of those agreements are sooner
terminated pursuant to their respective provisions, the Chief
Executive Officer has five years remaining under the term of his
employment agreement, the Chief Operating Officer has three
years remaining under the term of his employment agreement, and
the Chief Financial Officer has two years remaining under the
term of his employment agreement. In addition, these employment
agreements provide for certain payments in the event an
officers employment with our company is terminated.
In the event any of these officers employment is
terminated due to death or disability, each officer, or their
estate, is entitled to receive the remaining base salary during
the remaining scheduled term of his employment agreement, the
acceleration of the vesting of his options, which options shall
remain exercisable for the full term, and the right to continue
receiving specified benefits and perquisites.
In the event any of these officers terminate their employment
agreements for cause, we terminate any of their employment
agreements without cause or a change of control occurs (in which
case such employment agreements terminate automatically), each
officer is entitled to receive the remaining base salary during
the remaining scheduled term of his employment agreement, a
bonus based on past bonuses, the acceleration of the vesting of
his options, which options shall remain exercisable for the full
term, and the right to continue receiving specified benefits and
perquisites.
In the event of a change of control, in which case all of these
employment agreements would terminate simultaneously, collective
cash payments would be made to these officers. In addition, if
any of the amounts payable to these officers under these
provisions constitute excess parachute payments
under the Internal Revenue Code, each officer is entitled to an
additional payment to cover the tax consequences associated with
excess parachute payments.
Pursuant to a letter agreement between our Senior Vice President
and our company, in the event our Senior Vice Presidents
employment is terminated for any reason other than cause, that
officer is entitled to receive an amount equal to one
years base salary in effect at the date of termination and
the right to continue receiving specified benefits and
perquisites. Our Senior Vice Presidents base salary and
annual bonus are set by our Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors.
69
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
f. Other
Contingencies
We have certain contingent liabilities resulting from litigation
and claims incident to the ordinary course of our business. We
believe that the probable resolution of such contingencies will
not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Federal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
42,631
|
|
|
$
|
29,197
|
|
|
$
|
29,021
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
6,458
|
|
|
|
7,539
|
|
|
|
6,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,089
|
|
|
|
36,736
|
|
|
|
35,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
9,331
|
|
|
|
5,941
|
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,561
|
|
|
|
7,377
|
|
|
|
7,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,650
|
|
|
$
|
44,113
|
|
|
$
|
43,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred income tax assets (liabilities) at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 is comprised of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
4,423
|
|
|
$
|
3,045
|
|
State taxes
|
|
|
2,247
|
|
|
|
1,709
|
|
Other liabilities and reserves
|
|
|
6,860
|
|
|
|
5,211
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current deferred income tax
assets, net
|
|
$
|
14,935
|
|
|
$
|
10,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax
(liabilities) assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
11,043
|
|
|
$
|
12,910
|
|
Write-down of assets
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
Start-up
costs
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
10,035
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(55,635
|
)
|
|
|
(43,451
|
)
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,184
|
)
|
|
|
(1,105
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on investments
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(8,592
|
)
|
|
|
(8,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current deferred income
tax liabilities, net
|
|
$
|
(39,804
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
At December 31, 2006, we had Federal net operating loss
(NOL) carryforwards of approximately
$36.0 million, comprised mainly of acquired NOL
carryforwards. These NOLs expire at various dates through 2026.
Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the utilization of NOL
carryforwards to reduce taxable income will be restricted under
certain circumstances. Events that cause such a limitation
include, but are not limited to, a cumulative ownership change
of more than 50% over a three-year period. We believe that some
of our acquisitions caused such a change of ownership and,
accordingly, utilization of the NOL carryforwards may be limited
in future years. Accordingly, the valuation allowance is
principally related to subsidiaries NOL carryforwards as
well as certain investment related expenditures where the
realization of this benefit is uncertain at this time.
Our effective tax rate was 36.1%, 39.4% and 40.4% in 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively. The effective tax rate for 2006 as
compared to 2005 reflects a tax benefit in the amount of
$6.8 million recognized during the first quarter of 2006
due to the outcome of an income tax audit that resulted in a
reduction in our estimated tax liabilities, and a
$1.3 million tax adjustment related to an increase in our
estimated current tax liabilities as of December 31, 2006
recognized in the fourth quarter of 2006. The effective tax rate
for 2005 as compared to 2004 reflects a lower weighted-average
state statutory tax rate due to a favorable shift in the number
of facilities that we operated in states with lower tax rates or
no state income tax.
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the amount
computed at the Federal statutory rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Federal income tax at statutory
rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State taxes, net of Federal benefit
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Reduction in Federal tax liability
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.1
|
%
|
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
|
|
40.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Partnership Interests
|
We own some of our animal hospitals in partnerships with
minority interest holders. We consolidate our partnerships in
our consolidated financial statements because our ownership
interest in these partnerships is equal to or greater than 50.1%
and we control these entities. We record minority interest in
income of subsidiaries equal to our partners percentage
ownership of the partnerships income. Minority interest in
income of subsidiaries was $3.1 million, $3.1 million
and $2.6 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In
addition, we reflect our minority partners cumulative
share in the equity of the respective partnerships as minority
interests in our consolidated balance sheets. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, minority interest was
$9.7 million and $9.9 million, respectively.
The terms of some of our partnership agreements require us to
purchase the partners equity in the partnership in the
event of the partners death. These obligations are
considered liabilities because of the certainty of the event. As
a result we valued these liabilities at fair value as of the
date of partnership formation. At December 31, 2006 and
2005, these liabilities were $1.8 million and
$2.0 million, respectively, and are included in other
liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
12. 401(k)
Plan
In 1992, we established a voluntary retirement plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan
covers all employees with at least six months of employment with
our company and provides the annual matching contributions by us
at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our expense for
matching
71
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
contributions to our voluntary retirement plan approximated
$2.0 million, $1.6 million and $1.3 million in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
We have four reportable segments: Laboratory, Animal Hospital,
Medical Technology and Corporate. These segments are strategic
business units that have different products, services
and/or
functions. The segments are managed separately because each is a
distinct and different business venture with unique challenges,
risks and rewards. The Laboratory segment provides diagnostic
laboratory testing services for veterinarians, both associated
with our animal hospitals and those independent of us. The
Animal Hospital segment provides veterinary services for
companion animals and sells related retail and pharmaceutical
products. The Medical Technology segment sells digital
radiography and ultrasound imaging equipment, related computer
hardware, software and ancillary services to the veterinary
market. The Corporate segment provides selling, general and
administrative support services for the other segments.
The accounting policies of our segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies
included in Note 2., Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies. We evaluate the performance of our segments based
on gross profit and operating income. For purposes of reviewing
the operating performance of the segments, all intercompany
sales and purchases are accounted for as if they were
transactions with independent third parties at current market
prices.
72
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following is a summary of certain financial data for each of
our segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Animal
|
|
|
Medical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory
|
|
|
Hospital
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenue
|
|
$
|
235,781
|
|
|
$
|
711,997
|
|
|
$
|
35,535
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
983,313
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
22,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
258,345
|
|
|
|
711,997
|
|
|
|
39,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,334
|
)
|
|
|
983,313
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
138,896
|
|
|
|
573,639
|
|
|
|
25,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,878
|
)
|
|
|
712,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
119,449
|
|
|
|
138,358
|
|
|
|
14,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,456
|
)
|
|
|
270,564
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense
|
|
|
17,460
|
|
|
|
20,232
|
|
|
|
10,762
|
|
|
|
29,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,020
|
|
Write-down and loss on sale of
assets
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
101,981
|
|
|
$
|
118,138
|
|
|
$
|
3,451
|
|
|
$
|
(29,587
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,456
|
)
|
|
$
|
192,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
14,595
|
|
|
$
|
1,452
|
|
|
$
|
1,753
|
|
|
$
|
(202
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,242
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
9,054
|
|
|
$
|
23,359
|
|
|
$
|
615
|
|
|
$
|
3,914
|
|
|
$
|
(1,626
|
)
|
|
$
|
35,316
|
|
Total assets at December 31,
2006
|
|
$
|
167,363
|
|
|
$
|
671,975
|
|
|
$
|
53,161
|
|
|
$
|
85,533
|
|
|
$
|
(6,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
971,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenue
|
|
$
|
203,595
|
|
|
$
|
607,565
|
|
|
$
|
28,506
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
839,666
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
18,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
222,064
|
|
|
|
607,565
|
|
|
|
30,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,293
|
)
|
|
|
839,666
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
123,138
|
|
|
|
489,326
|
|
|
|
20,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,562
|
)
|
|
|
613,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
98,926
|
|
|
|
118,239
|
|
|
|
9,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
225,867
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense
|
|
|
13,993
|
|
|
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
9,033
|
|
|
|
26,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,185
|
|
Write-down and loss on sale of
assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
84,928
|
|
|
$
|
101,581
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
(26,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
(731
|
)
|
|
$
|
159,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
3,954
|
|
|
$
|
12,457
|
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
|
$
|
1,676
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,335
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
8,409
|
|
|
$
|
16,528
|
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
|
$
|
4,404
|
|
|
$
|
(828
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,209
|
|
Total assets at December 31,
2005
|
|
$
|
146,902
|
|
|
$
|
615,824
|
|
|
$
|
47,114
|
|
|
$
|
90,977
|
|
|
$
|
(2,412
|
)
|
|
$
|
898,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenue
|
|
$
|
186,976
|
|
|
$
|
481,023
|
|
|
$
|
6,090
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
674,089
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
13,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,465
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
200,441
|
|
|
|
481,023
|
|
|
|
6,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,465
|
)
|
|
|
674,089
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
112,661
|
|
|
|
387,477
|
|
|
|
3,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,465
|
)
|
|
|
490,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
87,780
|
|
|
|
93,546
|
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,531
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense
|
|
|
12,660
|
|
|
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
20,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,257
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
75,119
|
|
|
$
|
80,727
|
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
(20,994
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
135,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
3,482
|
|
|
$
|
10,502
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
$
|
1,542
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,815
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
7,392
|
|
|
$
|
14,561
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
1,806
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,954
|
|
Total assets at December 31,
2004
|
|
$
|
136,810
|
|
|
$
|
503,485
|
|
|
$
|
35,198
|
|
|
$
|
67,817
|
|
|
$
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
$
|
742,100
|
|
73
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE I
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
VCA
ANTECH, INC. (Parent Company)
CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
2006 and 2005
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
440,758
|
|
|
|
335,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
440,758
|
|
|
$
|
335,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany payable
|
|
$
|
10,453
|
|
|
$
|
27,069
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
275,013
|
|
|
|
258,402
|
|
Accumulated earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
154,586
|
|
|
|
49,057
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
430,305
|
|
|
|
308,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
440,758
|
|
|
$
|
335,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
VCA
ANTECH, INC. (Parent Company)
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down and loss on sale of
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Equity interest in income of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
105,528
|
|
|
|
67,815
|
|
|
|
63,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
and provision for income taxes
|
|
|
105,529
|
|
|
|
67,816
|
|
|
|
63,573
|
|
Minority interest in income of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
105,529
|
|
|
|
67,816
|
|
|
|
63,573
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
105,529
|
|
|
$
|
67,816
|
|
|
$
|
63,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
VCA
ANTECH, INC. (Parent Company)
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
105,529
|
|
|
$
|
67,816
|
|
|
$
|
63,572
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity interest in earnings of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
(105,528
|
)
|
|
|
(67,815
|
)
|
|
|
(63,570
|
)
|
Increase in intercompany receivable
|
|
|
(6,228
|
)
|
|
|
(3,223
|
)
|
|
|
(2,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(6,227
|
)
|
|
|
(3,222
|
)
|
|
|
(2,919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under stock option plans
|
|
|
6,227
|
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
6,227
|
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
VCA
ANTECH, INC. (Parent Company)
NOTES TO
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The borrowings under the senior credit facility are guaranteed
by VCA Antech, Inc. (VCA) and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Vicar Operating, Inc. (Vicar), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of VCA, may borrow up to
$75.0 million under a revolving line of credit under the
senior credit facility. VCAs guarantee under the senior
credit facility is secured by the assets of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries in addition to a pledge of capital stock or similar
equity interest of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Our senior subordinated notes were general unsecured obligations
owed by Vicar. These notes were unconditionally guaranteed on a
senior subordinated basis by VCA and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries.
See Note 5., Long-Term Obligations, in our
accompanying consolidated financial statements of this annual
report on
Form 10-K
for a five-year schedule of debt maturities.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Dividends
from Subsidiaries
|
The senior credit facility has restrictions on the ability of
Vicar and its consolidated subsidiaries to transfer assets in
the form of cash, dividends, loans or advances to VCA. For the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, VCA did not
receive any cash dividends from its consolidated subsidiaries.
77
VCA
ANTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
at End
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
Allowance for uncollectible accounts(2)
|
|
$
|
9,509
|
|
|
$
|
5,923
|
|
|
$
|
(4,703
|
)
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
|
$
|
11,253
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
Allowance for uncollectible accounts(2)
|
|
$
|
7,755
|
|
|
$
|
4,766
|
|
|
$
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
$
|
830
|
|
|
$
|
9,509
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
Allowance for uncollectible accounts(2)
|
|
$
|
6,744
|
|
|
$
|
3,411
|
|
|
$
|
(3,056
|
)
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
|
$
|
7,755
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other changes in the allowance for uncollectible
accounts include allowances acquired with animal hospitals and
laboratory acquisitions. |
|
(2) |
|
Balance includes allowance for trade accounts receivable and
notes receivable. |
78
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion
Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we have
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting them to material information
required to be included in our periodic reports filed or
furnished with the SEC.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our management does not expect that our control system will
prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how
well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect
the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits
of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
company have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty
and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or
mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the controls. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected.
Our managements report on internal control over financial
reporting, and the related report of our independent public
accounting firm, are included in our annual report on
Form 10-K
under Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, respectively, and are incorporated by
reference.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During our most recent fiscal quarter, there were no changes in
our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
|
Information regarding our directors and executive officers will
appear in the proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of
stockholders and is incorporated herein by this reference.
79
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information regarding executive compensation will appear in the
proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders and
is incorporated herein by this reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial
owners and management and related stockholder matters will
appear in the proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of
stockholders and is incorporated herein by this reference.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|
Information regarding certain relationships and related
transactions will appear in the proxy statement for the 2007
annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by
this reference.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information regarding principal accountant fees and services
will appear in the proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting
of stockholders and is incorporated herein by this reference.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS See Item 8 of this annual
report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM See Item 8 of this annual report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
(2)
|
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION See Item 8 of this annual report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
(3)
|
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING
ACCOUNTS See Item 8 of this annual report on
Form 10-K.
|
(4) EXHIBITS See Exhibit Index attached to
this annual report on
Form 10-K.
80
List of
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of Registrant. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants annual report on
Form 10-K
filed March 29, 2002.
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants current
report on
Form 8-K
filed July 16, 2004.
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Correction to the
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of Registrant. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants current report on
Form 8-K
filed July 16, 2004.
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the
Registrants quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
filed August 6, 2004.
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Certificate for shares of
common stock of Registrant. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.9 to Amendment No. 3 to the
Registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
filed November 16, 2001.
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Credit & Guaranty
Agreement, dated as of May 16, 2005, by and among
Registrant, Vicar Operating, Inc., certain subsidiaries of
Registrant as Guarantors, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P.,
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Administrative and
Collateral Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Registrants current report on
Form 8-K
filed May 18, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Credit and
Guaranty Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2006, by and
among Registrant, Vicar Operating, Inc., certain subsidiaries of
Registrant as Guarantors, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P.,
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Administrative and
Collateral Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Registrants current report on
Form 8-K
filed February 22, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated as
of September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant, Green
Equity Investors III, L.P., Co-Investment Funds and
Stockholders. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the Registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
filed August 9, 2001.
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2001, by
and among Registrant, Green Equity Investors III, L.P., GS
Mezzanine Partners II, L.P. and Robert Antin. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
filed October 31, 2001.
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2001, by
and among Registrant, Green Equity Investors III, L.P., GS
Mezzanine Partners II, L.P., Robert L. Antin, Arthur J.
Antin and Tomas W. Fuller. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrants registration statement on
Form S-3
filed January 17, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.6*
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of
November 27, 2001, by and between VCA Antech, Inc. and
Robert Antin. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to
the registration statement of Vicar Operating, Inc., on
Form S-4
filed February 1, 2002.
|
|
10
|
.7*
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of
November 27, 2001, by and between VCA Antech, Inc. and
Arthur J. Antin. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
to the registration statement of Vicar Operating, Inc., on
Form S-4
filed February 1, 2002.
|
|
10
|
.8*
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of
November 27, 2001, by and between VCA Antech, Inc. and
Tomas W. Fuller. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7
to the registration statement of Vicar Operating, Inc., on
Form S-4
filed February 1, 2002.
|
|
10
|
.9*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of
March 3, 2003, by and between VCA Antech, Inc. and Neil
Tauber. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrants annual report on
Form 10-K
filed March 27, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of
March 9, 2004, by and between VCA Antech, Inc. and Robert
L. Antin. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the
Registrants annual report on
Form 10-K
filed March 12, 2004.
|
|
10
|
.11*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of
March 9, 2004, by and between VCA Antech, Inc. and Arthur
J. Antin. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the
Registrants annual report on
Form 10-K
filed March 12, 2004.
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
10
|
.12*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of
March 9, 2004, by and between VCA Antech, Inc. and Tomas W.
Fuller. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the
Registrants annual report on
Form 10-K
filed March 12, 2004.
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
Summary of Board of Directors
Compensation.
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
Summary of Executive Officer
Compensation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.01 to
the Registrants current report on
Form 8-K
filed August 2, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
Summary of Cash Bonus Plan for
Executive Officers. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.01 to the Registrants current report on
Form 8-K
filed October 13, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Amended and Restated 1996 Stock
Incentive Plan of VCA Antech, Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
filed October 31, 2001.
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
2001 Stock Incentive Plan of VCA
Antech, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registrants registration
statement on
Form S-1
filed October 31, 2001.
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
VCA Antech, Inc. 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan, as amended on May 22, 2006. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrants
registration statement on Form S-8 filed on
December 15, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Stock Option Agreement for
VCA Antech, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Registrants
registration statement on
Form S-8
filed on December 15, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement
for VCA Antech, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the
Registrants registration statement on
Form S-8
filed on December 15, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Corporate Headquarters Lease,
dated as of January 1, 1999, by and between VCA Antech,
Inc. and Werner Wolfen, Michael Duritz, Nancy Bruch, Dorothy A.
Duritz, Harvey Rosenberg and Judy Rosenberg (Landlords).
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment
No. 1 to the Registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
filed October 15, 2001.
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Corporate Headquarters Lease,
dated as of June 9, 2004, by and between VCA Antech, Inc.
and Martin Shephard, Trustee of the Shephard Family Trust of
1998 (Lessor). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21
to the Registrants annual report on Form 10-K filed
March 14, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the
Registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
filed August 9, 2001.
|
|
14
|
.1
|
|
Code of Conduct and Business
Ethics of the Registrant. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 14.1 to the Registrants annual report on
Form 10-K
filed March 12, 2004.
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (included in
signature page).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
82
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized on February 27, 2007.
VCA Antech, Inc.
Tomas W. Fuller
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer,
Vice President and Secretary
KNOWN BY ALL PERSONS THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert L. Antin
and Tomas W. Fuller, or any one of them, their
attorneys-in-fact
and agents with full power of substitution and re-substitution,
for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this annual report
on
Form 10-K
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact
and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to
be done in and about the foregoing, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact
and agents, or either of them, or their substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ Robert
L. Antin
Robert
L. Antin
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Tomas
W.
Fuller Tomas
W. Fuller
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Principal
Financial Officer, Vice President and Secretary
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dawn
R.
Olsen Dawn
R. Olsen
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer, Vice
President and Controller
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
M.
Baumer John
M. Baumer
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
Heil John
Heil
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frank
Reddick Frank
Reddick
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
B.
Chickering, Jr. John
B. Chickering, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
Director
|
|
|
83