e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2011
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 0-27038
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-3156479
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
Incorporation or
Organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1 Wayside Road
Burlington, Massachusetts
|
|
01803
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(781) 565-5000
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE
ACT:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the outstanding common equity held
by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the last business day
of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter was approximately $3.6 billion based upon the last
reported sales price on the Nasdaq National Market for such
date. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of Common Stock
held by officers and directors of the Registrant and by persons
who hold more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock have been
excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.
This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily
conclusive.
The number of shares of the Registrants Common Stock,
outstanding as of October 31, 2011, was 300,761,764.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement to
be delivered to stockholders in connection with the
Registrants 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
PART I
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
|
[Removed and Reserved]
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
|
Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
|
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
113
|
|
EX-2.7 |
EX-21.1 |
EX-23.1 |
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT |
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT |
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
PART I
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never
materialize or if they prove incorrect, could cause our
consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements
other than statements of historical fact are statements that
could be deemed forward-looking, including statements pertaining
to: our future revenue, cost of revenue, research and
development expense, selling, general and administrative
expenses, amortization of intangible assets and gross margin,
earnings, cash flows and liquidity; our strategy relating to our
segments; the potential of future product releases; our product
development plans and investments in research and development;
future acquisitions and anticipated benefits from acquisitions;
international operations and localized versions of our products;
our contractual commitments; our fiscal 2012 revenue and expense
expectations and legal proceedings and litigation matters. You
can identify these and other forward-looking statements by the
use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including those set forth in Item 1A of this Annual Report
under the heading Risk Factors. All forward-looking
statements included in this document are based on information
available to us on the date hereof. We will not undertake and
specifically decline any obligation to update any
forward-looking statements.
Overview
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of voice and
language solutions for businesses and consumers around the
world. Our technologies, applications and services make the user
experience more compelling by transforming the way people
interact with devices and systems. Our solutions are used every
day by millions of people and thousands of businesses for tasks
and services such as requesting information from a phone-based
self-service solution, dictating medical records, searching the
mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a navigation
system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions help make
these interactions, tasks and experiences more productive,
compelling and efficient.
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our extensive network of partners to design and deploy
innovative solutions for businesses and organizations around the
globe. We market and sell our products directly through a
dedicated sales force and through our
e-commerce
website and also through a global network of resellers,
including system integrators, independent software vendors,
value-added resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications
carriers and distributors.
We have built a world-class portfolio of intellectual property,
technologies, applications and solutions through both internal
development and acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue
opportunities to expand our assets, geographic presence,
distribution network and customer base through acquisitions of
other businesses and technologies.
Effective in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we are organized
in four segments; Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer, Enterprise,
and Imaging. In fiscal 2011, segment revenue as a percentage of
total segment revenue for Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer,
Enterprise and Imaging was 38%, 28%, 21% and 13%, respectively.
In fiscal 2010, segment revenue as a percentage of total segment
revenue for Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer, Enterprise and
Imaging was 38%, 26%, 25% and 12%, respectively. See
Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information about our reportable segments.
Healthcare
The healthcare industry is under significant pressure to
streamline operations, reduce costs and improve patient care. In
recent years, healthcare organizations such as hospitals,
clinics, medical groups, physicians offices and
1
insurance providers have increasingly turned to speech
recognition solutions to automate manual processes such as the
dictation and transcription of patient records.
We provide comprehensive dictation and transcription solutions
and services that automate the input and management of medical
information. Our hosted and on-premise solutions provide
platforms to generate and distribute clinical documentation
through the use of advanced dictation and transcription
features, and allow us to deliver scalable, highly productive
medical transcription solutions. Our solutions also enable us to
accelerate future innovation to transform the way healthcare
providers document patient care, through improved interface with
electronic medical records and extraction of clinical
information to support the billing and insurance reimbursement
processes. We also offer speech recognition solutions for
radiology, cardiology, pathology and related specialties, that
help healthcare providers dictate, edit and sign reports without
manual transcription.
We utilize a focused, enterprise sales team and professional
services organization to address the market and implementation
requirements of the healthcare industry. Direct distribution is
supplemented by distributors and partnerships with electronic
medical records application and other healthcare IT providers
such as 3M, Allscripts, Cerner, Epic, GE, IBM and McKesson. In
some cases, our healthcare solutions are priced under a
traditional software perpetual licensing model. However, certain
of our healthcare solutions, in particular our transcription
solution, are also offered on an on-demand model, charged as a
subscription and priced by volume of usage (such as number of
lines transcribed). During fiscal 2009, 2010 and 2011, we
experienced a significant shift in customer preference toward
our subscription pricing model. Representative customers include
Banner Health, Cleveland Clinic, Department of Veterans Affairs,
HCA, Kaiser Permanente, Mayo Clinic, NHS, Sutter Health, Tenet,
UPMC and U.S. Army.
Mobile
and Consumer
Today, an increasing number of people worldwide rely on mobile
devices to stay connected, informed and productive. We help
consumers use the powerful capabilities of their phones, cars,
tablets, desktop and portable computers, personal navigation
devices and other consumer electronics by enabling the use of
voice commands,
text-to-speech
and enhanced text input solutions to control and interact with
these devices more easily and naturally, and to access the array
of content and services available on the Internet.
Our portfolio of mobile and consumer solutions and services
includes an integrated suite of voice control and
text-to-speech
solutions, dictation applications, predictive text technologies,
mobile messaging services and emerging services such as
dictation, Web search and
voicemail-to-text.
Our suite of Dragon general purpose desktop and portable
computer dictation applications increases productivity by using
speech to create documents, streamline repetitive and complex
tasks, input data, complete forms and automate manual
transcription processes. In particular, we have focused in
recent quarters on integrating our Dragon technology and brand
initiatives across mobile and consumer markets. We utilize a
focused, enterprise sales team and professional services
organization to address market and implementation requirements.
Direct distribution is supplemented by partnerships with
electronics suppliers and integrators such as Harman Kardon and
Clarion. Our solutions are used by mobile phone, automotive,
personal navigation device, computer and other consumer
electronic manufacturers and their suppliers, including Amazon,
Apple, Audi, BMW, Ford, Garmin, GM, HTC, LG Electronics,
Mercedes Benz, Nokia, Samsung,
T-Mobile,
TomTom and Toyota. Telecommunications carriers, web search
companies and content providers are increasingly using our
mobile search and communication solutions to offer value-added
services to their subscribers and customers. Our embedded mobile
solutions are sold to automobile and device manufacturers,
generally on a royalty model priced per device sold, and
sometimes on a license model. Our connected mobile services are
sold through telecommunications carriers, voicemail system
providers, smartphone application developers or directly to
consumers, and generally priced on a volume of usage model (such
as per subscriber or per use). Representative connected services
customers and partners include AT&T, Cisco, Comcast,
Rogers, Telefonica, Telstra, Time Warner Cable, TISA,
T-Mobile and
Vodafone. In addition, various smartphone app stores include
hundreds of applications that utilize our technology, such as
our DragonDictation, DragonGo! and FlexT9, as well as third
party applications including Amazon Price Check, Ask, Bon
App, iTranslate, Merriam-Webster, Vocre and Yellow Pages.
2
Our desktop and portable computer dictation software is
currently available in seventeen languages. During the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2010, we shipped new versions of Dragon
NaturallySpeaking for Windows and Dragon Dictate for Mac. Our
desktop and portable computer dictation solutions are generally
sold under a traditional perpetual software license model. We
utilize a combination of our global reseller network and direct
sales to distribute our desktop and portable computer dictation
products. Resellers include retailers such as Amazon, Best Buy
and WalMart. Enterprise customers include organizations such as
law firms, insurance agencies and government agencies.
Representative customers include ATF, Exxon, FBI, IBM, Texas
Department of Family Protective Services and Zurich.
Enterprise
To remain competitive, organizations must improve the quality of
customer care while reducing costs and ensuring a positive
customer experience. Technological innovation, competitive
pressures and rapid commoditization have made it increasingly
important for organizations to achieve enduring market
differentiation and secure customer loyalty. In this
environment, organizations need to satisfy the expectations of
increasingly savvy and mobile consumers who demand high levels
of customer service.
We deliver a portfolio of customer service business intelligence
and authentication solutions that are designed to help companies
better support, understand and communicate with their customers.
Our solutions include the use of technologies such as speech
recognition, natural language understanding,
text-to-speech,
biometric voice recognition and analytics to automate caller
identification and authorization, call steering, completion of
tasks such as updates, purchases and information retrieval, and
automated outbound notifications. Our solutions improve the
customer experience, increase the use of self-service and enable
new revenue opportunities. We complement our solutions and
products with a global professional services organization that
supports customers and partners with business and systems
consulting project management, user-interface design, voice
science, application development and business performance
optimization, allowing us to deliver
end-to-end
speech solutions and system integration for voice-enabled
customer care. In addition, we offer solutions that can meet
customer care needs through direct interaction with thin-client
applications on cell phones, enabling customers to very quickly
retrieve relevant information. Use of our speech-enabled and
thin-client customer care solutions can dramatically decrease
customer care costs, in comparison to calls handled by operators.
Our solutions are used by a wide variety of enterprises in
customer-service intensive sectors, including
telecommunications, financial services, travel and
entertainment, and government. Our speech solutions are designed
to serve our global partners and customers and are available in
approximately 60 languages and dialects worldwide. In
addition to our own sales and professional services teams, we
often work closely with industry partners, including Avaya,
Cisco and Genesys, that integrate our solutions into their
hardware and software platforms. Our enterprise solutions
offerings include both a traditional software perpetual
licensing model and an on-demand model, charged as a
subscription and priced by volume of usage (such as number of
minutes callers use the system or number of calls completed in
the system). Representative customers include Bank of America,
Cigna, Citibank, Disney, FedEx, Onstar, US Airways and Wells
Fargo.
Imaging
The evolution of the Internet, email and other networks has
greatly simplified the ability to share electronic documents,
resulting in an ever-growing volume of documents to be used and
stored. In addition, the proliferation of network and Internet
connected multifunction printers has increased the need to
efficiently manage printers and enforce printing policies. Our
document imaging, print management and PDF solutions reduce the
costs associated with paper documents through easy to use
scanning, document management and electronic document routing
solutions. We offer versions of our products to multifunction
printer manufacturers, home offices, small businesses and
enterprise customers.
Our imaging solutions offer optical character recognition
technology to deliver highly accurate document scanning and
storage. We provide networked print management and comprehensive
PDF applications designed specifically for business users. In
addition, we offer applications that combine network scanning,
network print management and PDF creation to quickly enable
distribution of documents to users desktops or to
enterprise applications. Our host of services includes software
development toolkits for independent software vendors. Our
3
imaging solutions are generally sold under a traditional
perpetual software license model, and some solutions are also
offered as a hosted solution. We utilize a combination of our
global reseller network and direct sales to distribute our
imaging products. We license our software to multifunction
printer manufacturers such as Brother, Canon, Dell, HP and
Xerox, which bundle our solutions with multi-function devices,
digital copiers, printers and scanners, on a royalty model,
priced per unit sold.
Research
and Development/Intellectual Property
In recent years, we have developed and acquired extensive
technology assets, intellectual property and industry expertise
in voice, language and imaging that provide us with a
competitive advantage in our markets. Our technologies are based
on complex algorithms which require extensive amounts of
linguistic and image data, acoustic models and recognition
techniques. A significant investment in capital and time would
be necessary to replicate our current capabilities.
We continue to invest in technologies to maintain our
market-leading position and to develop new applications. Our
technologies are covered by approximately 2,300 patents and
1,500 patent applications. Our intellectual property, whether
purchased or developed internally, is critical to our success
and competitive position and, ultimately, to our market value.
We rely on a portfolio of patents, copyrights, trademarks,
services marks, trade secrets, confidentiality provisions and
licensing arrangements to establish and protect our intellectual
property and proprietary rights. We incurred research and
development expenses of $179.4 million,
$152.1 million, and $116.8 million in fiscal 2011,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
International
Operations
We have principal offices in a number of international locations
including: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Hungary, India,
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom. The responsibilities of
our international operations include research and development,
healthcare transcription and editing, customer support, sales
and marketing and administration. Additionally, we maintain
smaller sales, services and support offices throughout the world
to support our international customers and to expand
international revenue opportunities.
Geographic revenue classification is based on the geographic
areas in which our customers are located. For fiscal 2011, 2010
and 2009, 73%, 72% and 74% of revenue was generated in the
United States and 27%, 28% and 26% of revenue was generated by
our international operations, respectively.
Competition
The individual markets in which we compete are highly
competitive and are subject to rapid technology changes. There
are a number of companies that develop or may develop products
that compete in our target markets; however, currently there is
no one company that competes with us in all of our product
areas. While we expect competition to continue to increase both
from existing competitors and new market entrants, we believe
that we will compete effectively based on many factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Specialized Professional Services. Our
superior technology, when coupled with the high quality and
domain knowledge of our professional services organization,
allows our customers and partners to place a high degree of
confidence and trust in our ability to deliver results. We
support our customers in designing and building powerful
innovative applications that specifically address their needs
and requirements.
|
|
|
|
International Appeal. The international reach
of our products is due to the broad language coverage of our
offerings, including our voice and language technology, which
provides recognition for approximately 60 languages and
dialects and natural-sounding synthesized speech in
39 languages, and supports a broad range of hardware
platforms and operating systems. Our imaging technology supports
more than 100 languages.
|
|
|
|
Technological Superiority. Our voice, language
and imaging technologies, applications and solutions are often
recognized as the most innovative and proficient products in
their respective categories. Our voice and language technology
has industry-leading recognition accuracy and provides a
natural, voice-enabled interaction with systems, devices and
applications. Our imaging technology is viewed as the most
accurate in
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
the industry. Technology publications, analyst research and
independent benchmarks have consistently indicated that our
products rank at or above performance levels of alternative
solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broad Distribution Channels. Our ability to
address the needs of specific markets, such as financial, legal,
healthcare and government, and to introduce new products and
solutions quickly and effectively is enhanced through our
dedicated direct sales force; our extensive global network of
resellers, comprising system integrators, independent software
vendors, value-added resellers, hardware vendors,
telecommunications carriers and distributors; and our
e-commerce
website (www.nuance.com).
|
In our segments, we compete with companies such as Adobe,
Medquist, Microsoft and Google. In addition, a number of smaller
companies in both speech and imaging offer services,
technologies or products that are competitive with our solutions
in some markets. In certain markets, some of our partners such
as Avaya, Cisco, Intervoice and Genesys develop and market
products and services that might be considered substitutes for
our solutions. Current and potential competitors have
established, or may establish, cooperative relationships among
themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of
their technologies to address the needs of our prospective
customers.
Some of our competitors or potential competitors, such as Adobe,
Microsoft and Google, have significantly greater financial,
technical and marketing resources than we do. These competitors
may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to new or
emerging technologies or changes in customer requirements. They
may also devote greater resources to the development, promotion
and sale of their products than we do.
Employees
As of September 30, 2011, we had approximately
7,300 full-time employees in total, including approximately
900 in sales and marketing, approximately 1,750 in professional
services, approximately 1,200 in research and development,
approximately 550 in general and administrative and
approximately 2,900 that provide transcription and editing
services. Approximately 43 percent of our employees are
based outside of the United States, the majority of whom provide
transcription and editing services and are based in India. Our
employees are not represented by any labor union and are not
organized under a collective bargaining agreement, and we have
never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our
relationships with our employees are generally good.
Company
Information
We were incorporated in 1992 as Visioneer, Inc. under the laws
of the state of Delaware. In 1999, we changed our name to
ScanSoft, Inc. and also changed our ticker symbol to SSFT. In
October 2005, we changed our name to Nuance Communications, Inc.
and in November 2005 we changed our ticker symbol to NUAN.
Our website is located at www.nuance.com. This Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
our Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to these reports, as well as proxy statements
and other information we file with or furnish to the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, are accessible free of
charge on our website. We make these documents available as soon
as reasonably practicable after we file them with, or furnish
them to, the SEC. Our SEC filings are also available on the
SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Alternatively, you may access any document we have filed by
visiting the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be
obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Except as otherwise stated in these documents, the information
contained on our website or available by hyperlink from our
website is not incorporated by reference into this report or any
other documents we file with or furnish to the SEC.
You should carefully consider the risks described below when
evaluating our company and when deciding whether to invest in
our company. The risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we do not currently believe are
important to an investor may also harm our business operations.
If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions
described in the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or our results of operations could
5
be seriously harmed. If that happens, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of the
value of any of our shares held by you.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to
period, and this may cause our stock price to
decline.
Our revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past
and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. Given
this fluctuation, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons
of revenue and operating results are not necessarily meaningful
or an accurate indicator of our future performance. As a result,
our results of operations may not meet the expectations of
securities analysts or investors in the future. If this occurs,
the price of our stock would likely decline. Factors that
contribute to fluctuations in operating results include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
slowing sales by our distribution and fulfillment partners to
their customers, which may place pressure on these partners to
reduce purchases of our products;
|
|
|
|
volume, timing and fulfillment of customer orders;
|
|
|
|
our ability to generate additional revenue from our intellectual
property portfolio;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying their purchasing decisions in anticipation of
new versions of our products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying, canceling or limiting their purchases as a
result of the threat or results of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
seasonality in purchasing patterns of our customers;
|
|
|
|
reduction in the prices of our products in response to
competition, market conditions or contractual obligations;
|
|
|
|
returns and allowance charges in excess of accrued amounts;
|
|
|
|
timing of significant marketing and sales promotions;
|
|
|
|
impairment charges against goodwill and intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
delayed realization of synergies resulting from our acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
write-offs of excess or obsolete inventory and accounts
receivable that are not collectible;
|
|
|
|
increased expenditures incurred pursuing new product or market
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends as they affect retail and corporate
sales; and
|
|
|
|
higher than anticipated costs related to fixed-price contracts
with our customers.
|
Due to the foregoing factors, among others, our revenue and
operating results are difficult to forecast. Our expense levels
are based in significant part on our expectations of future
revenue and we may not be able to reduce our expenses quickly to
respond to a shortfall in projected revenue. Therefore, our
failure to meet revenue expectations would seriously harm our
operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We
have grown, and may continue to grow, through acquisitions,
which could dilute our existing stockholders.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. In connection with past acquisitions, we issued a
substantial number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration and also incurred significant debt to finance the
cash consideration used for our acquisitions. We may continue to
issue equity securities for future acquisitions, which would
dilute existing stockholders, perhaps significantly depending on
the terms of such acquisitions. We may also incur additional
debt in connection with future acquisitions, which, if available
at all, may place additional restrictions on our ability to
operate our business.
6
Our
ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions
will depend on successfully integrating the acquired
businesses.
Our prior acquisitions required, and our recently completed
acquisitions continue to require, substantial integration and
management efforts and we expect future acquisitions to require
similar efforts. Acquisitions of this nature involve a number of
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty in transitioning and integrating the operations and
personnel of the acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulty in successfully implementing, upgrading and
deploying in a timely and effective manner new operational
information systems and upgrades of our finance, accounting and
product distribution systems;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into
our products and technology;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulties in completing projects associated with
in-process research and development;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired
development projects and technology integration;
|
|
|
|
management of geographically remote business units both in the
United States and internationally;
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with partners and customers;
|
|
|
|
assumption of unknown material liabilities of acquired companies;
|
|
|
|
accurate projection of revenue plans of the acquired entity in
the due diligence process;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying purchases of our products pending resolution
of product integration between our existing and our newly
acquired products;
|
|
|
|
entering markets or types of businesses in which we have limited
experience; and
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of the acquired business.
|
As a result of these and other risks, if we are unable to
successfully integrate acquired businesses, we may not realize
the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. Any failure to
achieve these benefits or failure to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies could seriously harm our
business.
Charges
to earnings as a result of our acquisitions may adversely affect
our operating results in the foreseeable future, which could
have a material and adverse effect on the market value of our
common stock.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, we record the market value of our common
stock or other form of consideration issued in connection with
an acquisition as the cost of acquiring the company or business.
We have allocated that cost to the individual assets acquired
and liabilities assumed, including various identifiable
intangible assets such as acquired technology, acquired trade
names and acquired customer relationships based on their
respective fair values. Our estimates of fair value are based
upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are
inherently uncertain. After we complete an acquisition, the
following factors could result in material charges and adversely
affect our operating results and may adversely affect our cash
flows:
|
|
|
|
|
costs incurred to combine the operations of businesses we
acquire, such as transitional employee expenses and employee
retention, redeployment or relocation expenses;
|
|
|
|
impairment of goodwill or intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
amortization of intangible assets acquired;
|
|
|
|
a reduction in the useful lives of intangible asset acquired;
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
identification of or changes to assumed contingent liabilities,
both income tax and non-income tax related after our final
determination of the amounts for these contingencies or the
conclusion of the measurement period (generally up to one year
from the acquisition date), whichever comes first;
|
|
|
|
charges to our operating results to eliminate certain
duplicative pre-merger activities, to restructure our operations
or to reduce our cost structure;
|
|
|
|
charges to our operating results resulting from expenses
incurred to effect the acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
charges to our operating results due to the expensing of certain
stock awards assumed in an acquisition.
|
Intangible assets are generally amortized over a five to fifteen
year period. Goodwill and certain intangible assets with
indefinite lives, are not subject to amortization but are
subject to an impairment analysis, at least annually, which may
result in an impairment charge if the carrying value exceeds its
implied fair value. As of September 30, 2011, we had
identified intangible assets of approximately
$731.6 million, net of accumulated amortization, and
goodwill of approximately $2.3 billion. In addition,
purchase accounting limits our ability to recognize certain
revenue that otherwise would have been recognized by the
acquired company as an independent business. As a result, the
combined company may delay revenue recognition or recognize less
revenue than we and the acquired company would have recognized
as independent companies.
Our
significant debt could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our credit
facility and our convertible debentures.
We have a significant amount of debt. As of September 30,
2011, we had a total of $887.4 million of gross debt
outstanding, including $145.0 million in term loans due in
March 2013, $492.0 million in term loans due in March 2016
under an amended and restated agreement signed in July 2011, and
$250.0 million in convertible debentures. Investors may
require us to redeem the convertible debentures in August 2014,
or sooner if our common stock price exceeds the conversion price
of approximately $23.36 for certain specified periods. We also
have a $75.0 million revolving credit line available to us
through March 2015. As of September 30, 2011, there were
$15.4 million of letters of credit issued but there were no
other outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit line.
Additionally, on October 24, 2011, we sold
$690.0 million of 2.75% convertible debentures which
investors may require us to redeem in November 2017. Our debt
level could have important consequences, for example it could:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to use a large portion of our cash flow to pay
principal and interest on debt, including the convertible
debentures and the credit facility, which will reduce the
availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, research and development
expenditures and other business activities;
|
|
|
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting
business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants
related to our debt, our ability to borrow additional funds,
dispose of assets or pay cash dividends.
|
Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations under our
debt instruments depends on our ability to generate significant
cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and
regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our
control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate
cash flow from operations, or that additional capital will be
available to us, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet
our payment obligations under the convertible debentures and our
other debt and to fund other liquidity needs. If we are not able
to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt
obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt,
including the convertible debentures, sell assets, reduce or
delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital.
If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives,
we may not be able to meet our payment obligations under the
convertible debentures and our other debt.
In addition, a substantial portion of our debt bears interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, our debt
service requirements will increase, which would adversely affect
our results of operations and cash flows.
8
Our
debt agreements contain covenant restrictions that may limit our
ability to operate our business.
The agreement governing our senior credit facility contains, and
any of our other future debt agreements may contain, covenant
restrictions that limit our ability to operate our business,
including restrictions on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt or issue guarantees;
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain investments;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with our affiliates;
|
|
|
|
sell certain assets;
|
|
|
|
redeem capital stock or make other restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
declare or pay dividends or make other distributions to
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any entity.
|
Our ability to comply with these covenants is dependent on our
future performance, which will be subject to many factors, some
of which are beyond our control, including prevailing economic
conditions. As a result of these covenants, our ability to
respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to
obtain additional financing, if needed, may be significantly
restricted, and we may be prevented from engaging in
transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. In
addition, our failure to comply with these covenants could
result in a default under our debt agreements, which could
permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the
debt. If any of our debt is accelerated, we may not have
sufficient funds available to repay the accelerated debt.
We
have a history of operating losses, and may incur losses in the
future, which may require us to raise additional capital on
unfavorable terms.
We reported net income of $38.2 million in fiscal 2011,
however we reported net losses of $19.1 million and
$19.4 million for the fiscal years 2010 and 2009,
respectively. If we are unable to maintain profitability, the
market price for our stock may decline, perhaps substantially.
We cannot assure you that our revenue will grow or that we will
maintain profitability in the future. If we do not achieve and
maintain profitability, we may be required to raise additional
capital to maintain or grow our operations. Additional capital,
if available at all, may be highly dilutive to existing
investors or contain other unfavorable terms, such as a high
interest rate and restrictive covenants.
Voice
and language technologies may not continue to garner widespread
acceptance, which could limit our ability to grow our voice and
language business.
We have invested and expect to continue to invest heavily in the
acquisition, development and marketing of voice and language
technologies. The market for voice and language technologies is
relatively new and rapidly evolving. Our ability to increase
revenue in the future depends in large measure on the continuing
acceptance of these technologies in general and our products in
particular. The continued development of the market for our
current and future voice and language solutions in general, and
our solutions in particular, will also depend on:
|
|
|
|
|
consumer and business demand for speech-enabled applications;
|
|
|
|
development by third-party vendors of applications using voice
and language technologies; and
|
|
|
|
continuous improvement in voice and language technology.
|
Sales of our voice and language products would be harmed if the
market for these technologies does not continue to increase or
increases slower than we expect, or if we fail to develop new
technology faster than our competitors, and consequently, our
business could be harmed and we may not achieve a level of
profitability necessary to successfully operate our business.
9
The
markets in which we operate are highly competitive and rapidly
changing and we may be unable to compete
successfully.
There are a number of companies that develop or may develop
products that compete in our targeted markets. The individual
markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and are
rapidly changing. Within voice and language, we compete with
AT&T, Microsoft, Google, and other smaller providers.
Within healthcare, we compete with Medquist and other smaller
providers. Within imaging, we compete with ABBYY, Adobe,
I.R.I.S. and NewSoft. In voice and language, some of our
partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Intervoice and Genesys develop
and market products that can be considered substitutes for our
solutions. In addition, a number of smaller companies in voice,
language and imaging produce technologies or products that are
in some markets competitive with our solutions. Current and
potential competitors have established, or may establish,
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties
to increase the ability of their technologies to address the
needs of our prospective customers.
The competition in these markets could adversely affect our
operating results by reducing the volume of the products we
license or the prices we can charge. Some of our current or
potential competitors, such as Adobe, Microsoft and Google, have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. These competitors may be able to respond
more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or
changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we do.
Some of our customers, such as Microsoft and Google, have
developed or acquired products or technologies that compete with
our products and technologies. These customers may give higher
priority to the sale of these competitive products or
technologies. To the extent they do so, market acceptance and
penetration of our products, and therefore our revenue, may be
adversely affected. Our success will depend substantially upon
our ability to enhance our products and technologies and to
develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new
products and features that meet changing customer requirements
and incorporate technological enhancements. If we are unable to
develop new products and enhance functionalities or technologies
to adapt to these changes, or if we are unable to realize
synergies among our acquired products and technologies, our
business will suffer.
The
failure to successfully maintain the adequacy of our system of
internal control over financial reporting could have a material
adverse impact on our ability to report our financial results in
an accurate and timely manner.
The SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring public companies to include
a report of management on internal control over financial
reporting in their annual reports on
Form 10-K
that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition,
our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to
and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting. Any failure in the effectiveness of our
system of internal control over financial reporting could have a
material adverse impact on our ability to report our financial
statements in an accurate and timely manner, could subject us to
regulatory actions, civil or criminal penalties, shareholder
litigation, or loss of customer confidence, which could result
in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a
loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial
statements, which ultimately could negatively impact our stock
price.
A
significant portion of our revenue is derived, and a significant
portion of our research and development activities are based,
outside the United States. Our results could be harmed by
economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with
these international regions.
Because we operate worldwide, our business is subject to risks
associated with doing business internationally. We anticipate
that revenue from international operations could increase in the
future. Most of our international revenue is generated by sales
in Europe and Asia. In addition, some of our products are
developed and manufactured outside the United States and we have
a large number of employees in India that provide transcription
services. We also have a large number of employees in Canada and
United Kingdom that provide professional services. A significant
portion of the development and manufacturing of our voice and
language products is conducted in
10
Belgium and Canada, and a significant portion of our imaging
research and development is conducted in Hungary. We also have
significant research and development resources in Austria,
Germany, Italy, and United Kingdom. Accordingly, our future
results could be harmed by a variety of factors associated with
international sales and operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions economic
conditions;
|
|
|
|
geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism and war;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements imposed by the United States or by other countries;
|
|
|
|
compliance with foreign and domestic laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
negative consequences from changes in applicable tax laws;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing operations in multiple
locations in many countries;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting trade accounts receivable in other
countries; and
|
|
|
|
less effective protection of intellectual property than in the
United States.
|
We are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Because we have international subsidiaries and distributors that
operate and sell our products outside the United States, we are
exposed to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. In certain circumstances, we have entered into forward
exchange contracts to hedge against foreign currency
fluctuations. We use these contracts to reduce our risk
associated with exchange rate movements, as the gains or losses
on these contracts are intended to offset any exchange rate
losses or gains on the hedged transaction. We do not engage in
foreign currency speculation. With our increased international
presence in a number of geographic locations and with
international revenue and costs projected to increase, we are
exposed to changes in foreign currencies including the euro,
British pound, Canadian dollar, Japanese yen, Indian rupee,
Australian dollar, Israel shekel, Swiss franc and the Hungarian
forint. Changes in the value of foreign currencies relative to
the value of the U.S. dollar could adversely affect future
revenue and operating results.
Impairment
of our intangible assets could result in significant charges
that would adversely impact our future operating
results.
We have significant intangible assets, including goodwill and
intangibles with indefinite lives, which are susceptible to
valuation adjustments as a result of changes in various factors
or conditions. The most significant intangible assets are
patents and core technology, completed technology, customer
relationships and trademarks. Customer relationships are
amortized on an accelerated basis based upon the pattern in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are being
utilized. Other identifiable intangible assets are amortized on
a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We
assess the potential impairment of intangible assets on an
annual basis, as well as whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment of such
assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period;
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization or management reporting structure
that could result in additional reporting units, which may
require alternative methods of estimating fair values or greater
disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by reporting
unit; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
11
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact our
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified.
Our
sales to government clients subject us to risks, including early
termination, audits, investigations, sanctions and
penalties.
We derive a portion of our revenues from contracts with the
United States government, as well as various state and local
governments, and their respective agencies. Government contracts
are generally subject to audits and investigations which could
identify violations of these agreements. Government contract
violations could result in a range of consequences including,
but not limited to, contract price adjustments, civil and
criminal penalties, contract termination, forfeiture of profit
and/or
suspension of payment, and suspension or debarment from future
government contracts. We could also suffer serious harm to our
reputation if we were found to have violated the terms of our
government contracts.
We conducted an analysis of our compliance with the terms and
conditions of certain contracts with the U.S. General
Services Administration (GSA). Based upon our
analysis, we voluntarily notified GSA of non-compliance with the
terms of two contracts. The final resolution of this matter may
adversely impact our financial position.
If we
are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business
could be harmed.
If any of our key employees were to leave, we could face
substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could
experience a loss in productivity while any successor obtains
the necessary training and experience. Our employment
relationships are generally at-will and we have had key
employees leave in the past. We cannot assure you that one or
more key employees will not leave in the future. We intend to
continue to hire additional highly qualified personnel,
including software engineers and operational personnel, but may
not be able to attract, assimilate or retain qualified personnel
in the future. Any failure to attract, integrate, motivate and
retain these employees could harm our business.
Our
medical transcription services may be subject to legal claims
for failure to comply with laws governing the confidentiality of
medical records.
Healthcare professionals who use our medical transcription
services deliver to us health information about their patients
including information that constitutes a record under applicable
law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal
and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual
obligations govern collection, dissemination, use and
confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws;
|
|
|
|
our contracts with customers and partners;
|
|
|
|
state laws regulating healthcare professionals;
|
|
|
|
Medicaid laws; and
|
|
|
|
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing
Administration.
|
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal
privacy and security standards for the use and protection of
protected health information. Any failure by us or by our
personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may
result in a material liability. Although we have systems and
policies in place for safeguarding protected health information
from unauthorized disclosure, these systems and policies may not
preclude claims against us for alleged violations of applicable
requirements. There can be no assurance that we will not be
subject to liability claims that could have a material adverse
affect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
12
Adverse
changes in general economic or political conditions in any of
the major countries in which we do business could adversely
affect our operating results.
Adverse changes in domestic and global economic and political
conditions, as well as uncertainty in the global financial
markets may negatively affect our financial results. These
macroeconomic developments could negatively affect our business,
operating results or financial condition in a number of ways
which, in turn, could adversely affect our stock price. A
prolonged period of economic decline could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition and exacerbate some of the other risk factors
described herein. Our customers may defer purchases of our
products, licenses, and services in response to tighter credit
and negative financial news or reduce their demand for them. Our
customers may also not be able to obtain adequate access to
credit, which could affect their ability to make timely payments
to us or ultimately cause the customer to file for protection
from creditors under applicable insolvency or bankruptcy laws.
If our customers are not able to make timely payments to us, our
accounts receivable could increase. Political instability in any
of the major countries in which we do business would also likely
harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Current
uncertainty in the global financial markets and the global
economy may negatively affect our financial
results.
Our investment portfolio, which includes short-term debt
securities, is generally subject to credit, liquidity,
counterparty, market and interest rate risks that may be
exacerbated by the recent global financial crisis. If the
banking system or the fixed income, credit or equity markets
deteriorate or remain volatile, our investment portfolio may be
impacted and the values and liquidity of our investments could
be adversely affected.
In addition, our operating results and financial condition could
be negatively affected if, as a result of economic conditions,
either:
|
|
|
|
|
the demand for, and prices of, our products, licenses, or
services are reduced as a result of actions by our competitors
or otherwise; or
|
|
|
|
our financial counterparties or other contractual counterparties
are unable to, or do not, meet their contractual commitments to
us.
|
Security
and privacy breaches in our systems may damage client relations
and inhibit our growth.
The uninterrupted operation of our hosted solutions and the
confidentiality and security of third-party information is
critical to our business. Any failures in our security and
privacy measures could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position and results of operations. If we are unable
to protect, or our clients perceive that we are unable to
protect, the security and privacy of our electronic information,
our growth could be materially adversely affected. A security or
privacy breach may:
|
|
|
|
|
cause our clients to lose confidence in our solutions;
|
|
|
|
harm our reputation;
|
|
|
|
expose us to liability; and
|
|
|
|
increase our expenses from potential remediation costs.
|
While we believe we use proven applications designed for data
security and integrity to process electronic transactions, there
can be no assurance that our use of these applications will be
sufficient to address changing market conditions or the security
and privacy concerns of existing and potential clients.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property and Technology
Unauthorized
use of our proprietary technology and intellectual property
could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Our success and competitive position depend in large part on our
ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property rights
protecting our products and services. We rely on a combination
of patents, copyrights, trademarks,
13
service marks, trade secrets, confidentiality provisions and
licensing arrangements to establish and protect our intellectual
property and proprietary rights. Unauthorized parties may
attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain, license,
sell or otherwise use information that we regard as proprietary.
Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we
may not be able to protect our technology from unauthorized use.
Additionally, our competitors may independently develop
technologies that are substantially the same or superior to our
technologies and that do not infringe our rights. In these
cases, we would be unable to prevent our competitors from
selling or licensing these similar or superior technologies. In
addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our
proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States. Although the source code for our proprietary software is
protected both as a trade secret and as a copyrighted work,
litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property
rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity
and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend
against claims of infringement or invalidity. Litigation,
regardless of the outcome, can be very expensive and can divert
management efforts.
Third
parties have claimed and may claim in the future that we are
infringing their intellectual property, and we could be exposed
to significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented
from selling our products if such claims are
successful.
From time to time, we are subject to claims that we or our
customers may be infringing or contributing to the infringement
of the intellectual property rights of others. We may be unaware
of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of
our technologies and products. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. However, we may not be able to obtain licenses from some
or all claimants, the terms of any offered licenses may not be
acceptable to us, and we may not be able to resolve disputes
without litigation. Any litigation regarding intellectual
property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert the
attention of our management and key personnel from our business
operations. In the event of a claim of intellectual property
infringement, we may be required to enter into costly royalty or
license agreements. Third parties claiming intellectual property
infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to develop and
sell our products.
We may
incur substantial costs enforcing or acquiring intellectual
property rights and defending against third-party claims as a
result of litigation or other proceedings.
In connection with the enforcement of our own intellectual
property rights, the acquisition of third-party intellectual
property rights, or disputes relating to the validity or alleged
infringement of third-party intellectual property rights,
including patent rights, we have been, are currently, and may in
the future be, subject to claims, negotiations or complex,
protracted litigation. Intellectual property disputes and
litigation are typically very costly and can be disruptive to
our business operations by diverting the attention and energy of
management and key technical personnel. Although we have
successfully defended or resolved past litigation and disputes,
we may not prevail in any ongoing or future litigation and
disputes. In addition, we may incur significant costs in
acquiring the necessary third party intellectual property rights
for use in our products. Third party intellectual property
disputes could subject us to significant liabilities, require us
to enter into royalty and licensing arrangements on unfavorable
terms, prevent us from manufacturing or licensing certain of our
products, cause severe disruptions to our operations or the
markets in which we compete, or require us to satisfy
indemnification commitments with our customers including
contractual provisions under various license arrangements. Any
of these could seriously harm our business.
Our
software products may have bugs, which could result in delayed
or lost revenue, expensive correction, liability to our
customers and claims against us.
Complex software products such as ours may contain errors,
defects or bugs. Defects in the solutions or products that we
develop and sell to our customers could require expensive
corrections and result in delayed or lost revenue, adverse
customer reaction and negative publicity about us or our
products and services. Customers who are not satisfied with any
of our products may also bring claims against us for damages,
which, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming to
defend, and could result in costly litigation and payment of
damages. Such claims could harm our reputation, financial
results and competitive position.
14
Risks
Related to our Corporate Structure, Organization and Common
Stock
The
holdings of our largest stockholder may enable it to influence
matters requiring stockholder approval.
As of September 30, 2011, Warburg Pincus, a global private
equity firm, beneficially owned approximately 23% of our
outstanding common stock, including warrants exercisable for up
to 7,562,422 shares of our common stock, and
3,562,238 shares of our outstanding Series B Preferred
Stock, each of which is convertible into one share of our common
stock. Because of its large holdings of our capital stock
relative to other stockholders, this stockholder has a strong
influence over matters requiring approval by our stockholders.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be
subject to wide fluctuations, and this may make it difficult for
you to resell the common stock when you want or at prices you
find attractive.
Our stock price historically has been, and may continue to be,
volatile. Various factors contribute to the volatility of our
stock price, including, for example, quarterly variations in our
financial results, new product introductions by us or our
competitors and general economic and market conditions. Sales of
a substantial number of shares of our common stock by our
largest stockholders, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could also contribute to the volatility or our stock
price. While we cannot predict the individual effect that these
factors may have on the market price of our common stock, these
factors, either individually or in the aggregate, could result
in significant volatility in our stock price during any given
period of time. Moreover, companies that have experienced
volatility in the market price of their stock often are subject
to securities class action litigation. If we were the subject of
such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources.
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public
disclosure may result in additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, new regulations promulgated by the Securities
and Exchange Commission and the rules of the Nasdaq Marketplace,
are resulting in increased general and administrative expenses
for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations
in many cases, and as a result, their application in practice
may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory
and governing bodies, which could result in higher costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance
practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of
corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we
intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws,
regulations and standards, and this investment may result in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of
management time and attention from revenue-generating activities
to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new or
changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the
activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, our
business may be harmed.
Future
sales of our common stock in the public market could adversely
affect the trading price of our common stock and our ability to
raise funds in new stock offerings.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the
public market, or the perception that such sales could occur,
could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of our common
stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through
future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. In
connection with past acquisitions, we issued a substantial
number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration. We may continue to issue equity securities for
future acquisitions, which would dilute existing stockholders,
perhaps significantly depending on the terms of such
acquisitions. No prediction can be made as to the effect, if
any, that future sales of shares of common stock, or the
availability of shares of common stock for future sale, will
have on the trading price of our common stock.
15
We
have implemented anti-takeover provisions, which could
discourage or prevent a takeover, even if an acquisition would
be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
Delaware law, as well as other organizational documents could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if
doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
authorized blank check preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at meetings of our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
directors and for stockholder proposals.
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
16
Our corporate headquarters and administrative, sales, marketing,
research and development and customer support functions occupy
approximately 201,000 square feet of space that we lease in
Burlington, Massachusetts. We also lease additional properties
in the United States and a number of foreign countries. The
following table summarizes our significant properties as of
September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Sq. Ft.
|
|
|
Lease Term
|
|
Primary Use
|
|
|
(approx.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burlington, Massachusetts
|
|
|
201,000
|
|
|
March 2018
|
|
Corporate headquarters and administrative, sales, marketing,
research and development and customer support functions.
|
Redwood City, California(1)
|
|
|
141,000
|
|
|
July 2012
|
|
Twelve percent of this facility is unoccupied, the remainder has
been sublet to third party tenants.
|
Melbourne, Florida
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
Administrative, professional services, and customer support.
|
Montreal, Quebec
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
|
December 2016
|
|
Administrative, sales, marketing, research and development,
professional services, customer support functions.
|
Sunnyvale, California
|
|
|
71,000
|
|
|
September 2013
|
|
Administrative, research and development, professional services
and customer support functions.
|
Seattle Washington
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
January 2021
|
|
Research and development, and professional services functions.
|
Mahwah, New Jersey
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
June 2015
|
|
Professional services.
|
New York, New York(2)
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
February 2016
|
|
Subleased to third-party tenants.
|
Merelbeke, Belgium
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
March 2017
|
|
Administrative, sales, marketing, research and development and
customer support functions.
|
Budapest, Hungary
|
|
|
31,000
|
|
|
December 2012
|
|
Administrative and research and development.
|
Aachen, Germany
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
March 2016
|
|
Research and development and sales functions.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The lease for this property was assumed as part of our
acquisition in September 2005 of Nuance Communications, Inc,
which we refer to as Former Nuance. |
|
(2) |
|
The lease for this property was assumed as part of our
acquisition of SpeechWorks International, Inc. in August 2003. |
In addition to the properties referenced above, we also lease a
number of small sales and marketing offices in the United States
and internationally. As of September 30, 2011, we were
productively utilizing substantially all of the space in our
facilities, except for space identified above as unoccupied, or
that has been subleased to third parties.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Like many companies in the software industry, we have from time
to time been notified of claims that we may be infringing
certain intellectual property rights of others. These claims
have been referred to counsel, and they are in various stages of
evaluation and negotiation. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. There is no assurance that licenses will be offered by
all claimants, that the terms of any
17
offered licenses will be acceptable to us or that in all cases
the dispute will be resolved without litigation, which may be
time consuming and expensive, and may result in injunctive
relief or the payment of damages by us.
|
|
Item 4.
|
[Removed
and Reserved]
|
18
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol NUAN. The following table sets
forth, for our fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low sales
prices of our common stock, in each case as reported on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
13.11
|
|
|
$
|
16.31
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.12
|
|
|
|
17.41
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
14.85
|
|
|
|
18.55
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
14.45
|
|
|
|
17.68
|
|
Fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.79
|
|
|
$
|
19.19
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
16.79
|
|
|
|
20.97
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
18.85
|
|
|
|
22.93
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
15.56
|
|
|
|
22.40
|
|
Holders
As of October 31, 2011, there were 791 stockholders of
record of our common stock.
Dividend
Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently expect to retain future earnings, if any, to
finance the growth and development of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Furthermore, the terms of our credit facility place restrictions
on our ability to pay dividends, except for stock dividends.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
We have not announced any currently effective authorization to
repurchase shares of our common stock. We did, however,
repurchase 8,514,120 shares of our common stock for
$200 million in connection with our sale of
$690 million of 2.75% convertible debentures in October
2011.
19
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Data
|
The following selected consolidated financial data is not
necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(as adjusted for the retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20
in 2009, 2008 and 2007).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,318.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,118.9
|
|
|
$
|
950.4
|
|
|
$
|
868.5
|
|
|
$
|
602.0
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
818.9
|
|
|
|
709.6
|
|
|
|
590.8
|
|
|
|
552.8
|
|
|
|
404.1
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
57.6
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
38.2
|
|
|
$
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14.9
|
)
|
Net Income(Loss) Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
302.3
|
|
|
|
287.4
|
|
|
|
253.6
|
|
|
|
209.8
|
|
|
|
176.4
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
316.0
|
|
|
|
287.4
|
|
|
|
253.6
|
|
|
|
209.8
|
|
|
|
176.4
|
|
Financial Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
$
|
478.5
|
|
|
$
|
550.0
|
|
|
$
|
527.0
|
|
|
$
|
261.6
|
|
|
$
|
187.0
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,095.3
|
|
|
|
3,769.7
|
|
|
|
3,499.5
|
|
|
|
2,846.0
|
|
|
|
2,172.6
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
853.0
|
|
|
|
851.0
|
|
|
|
848.9
|
|
|
|
847.3
|
|
|
|
846.1
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,493.4
|
|
|
|
2,297.2
|
|
|
|
2,043.0
|
|
|
|
1,471.7
|
|
|
|
931.9
|
|
Selected Data and Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
379.9
|
|
|
$
|
459.2
|
|
|
$
|
376.6
|
|
|
$
|
133.5
|
|
|
$
|
164.9
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
143.3
|
|
|
|
135.6
|
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
82.6
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
Gross margin percentage
|
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
|
|
63.4
|
%
|
|
|
62.2
|
%
|
|
|
63.7
|
%
|
|
|
67.1
|
%
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis is
intended to help the reader understand the results of operations
and financial condition of our business. Managements
Discussion and Analysis is provided as a supplement to, and
should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never
materialize or if they prove incorrect, could cause our
consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include predictions regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
our future revenue, cost of revenue, research and development
expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses,
amortization of intangible assets and gross margin;
|
|
|
|
our strategy relating to our segments;
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
the potential of future product releases;
|
|
|
|
our product development plans and investments in research and
development;
|
|
|
|
future acquisitions, and anticipated benefits from acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
international operations and localized versions of our
products; and
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings and litigation matters.
|
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by
the use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks described in Item 1A Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to
the forward-looking statements or reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this document.
Overview
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of voice and
language solutions for businesses and consumers around the
world. Our technologies, applications and services make the user
experience more compelling by transforming the way people
interact with devices and systems. Our solutions are used every
day by millions of people and thousands of businesses for tasks
and services such as requesting information from a phone-based
self-service solution, dictating medical records, searching the
mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a navigation
system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions help make
these interactions, tasks and experiences more productive,
compelling and efficient.
Effective in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we are organized
in four segments; Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer, Enterprise,
and Imaging. Our solutions and services address our four
segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare. We provide comprehensive dictation
and transcription solutions and services that automate the input
and management of medical information. Our hosted and on-premise
solutions provide platforms to generate and distribute clinical
documentation through the use of advanced dictation and
transcription features, and allow us to deliver scalable, highly
productive medical transcription solutions. Our solutions also
enable us to accelerate future innovation to transform the way
healthcare providers document patient care, through improved
interface with electronic medical records and extraction of
clinical information to support the billing and insurance
reimbursement processes. We also offer speech recognition
solutions for radiology, cardiology, pathology and related
specialties, that help healthcare providers dictate, edit and
sign reports without manual transcription. Trends in our
healthcare business include a growing customer preference for
hosted solutions, increasing interest in the use of mobile
devices to access healthcare systems and records, and increasing
international interest. We are also seeing increased demand for
transactions which involve the sale and delivery of both
software and non-software related services or products, which
may benefit from the application of Financial Accounting
Standards board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 605, Revenue Recognition.
Over the last several quarters, we have signed several new
contracts for our hosted solutions, and the volume of lines
processed in these services has steadily increased. We are
investing to expand our product set to address these
opportunities, expand our international capabilities, and reduce
our time from contract signing to initiation of billable
services.
|
|
|
|
Mobile and Consumer. Our portfolio of mobile
and consumer solutions and services includes an integrated suite
of voice control and
text-to-speech
solutions, dictation applications, predictive text technologies,
mobile messaging services and emerging services such as
dictation, Web search and
voicemail-to-text.
Our suite of Dragon general purpose desktop and portable
computer dictation applications increases productivity by using
speech to create documents, streamline repetitive and complex
tasks, input data, complete forms
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
and automate manual transcription processes. In particular, we
have focused in recent quarters on integrating our Dragon
technology and brand initiatives across mobile and consumer
markets. Trends in our mobile-consumer segment include device
manufacturers requiring custom applications to deliver unique
and differentiated products, broadening keyboard technologies to
take advantage of touch screens, increasing hands-free
capabilities on cell phones and automobiles to address the
growing concern of distracted driving, and the adoption of our
technology on a broadening scope of devices, such as
televisions, set-top boxes,
e-book
readers and tablet computers. We are also seeing increased
demand for transactions which involve the sale and delivery of
both software and non-software related services or products,
which may benefit from the application of ASC 605. We are
investing to increase our capabilities and capacity to help
device manufacturers build custom applications, to increase the
capacity of our data centers, to increase the number, kinds and
capacity of network services, to enable developers to access our
technology, and to expand both awareness and channels for our
direct-to-consumer
products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise. We deliver a portfolio of customer
service business intelligence and authentication solutions that
are designed to help companies better support, understand and
communicate with their customers. Our solutions include the use
of technologies such as speech recognition, natural language
understanding,
text-to-speech,
biometric voice recognition and analytics to automate caller
identification and authorization, call steering, completion of
tasks such as updates, purchases and information retrieval, and
automated outbound notifications. Our solutions improve the
customer experience, increase the use of self-service and enable
new revenue opportunities. In addition, we offer solutions that
can meet customer care needs through direct interaction with
thin-client applications on cell phones, enabling customers to
very quickly retrieve relevant information. Trends in our
enterprise business include increasing interest in the use of
mobile applications to access customer care systems and records,
increasing interest in coordinating actions and data across
customer care channels, and the ability of a broader set of
hardware providers and systems integrators to serve the market.
We are investing to expand our product set to address these
opportunities, to increase efficiency of our hosted
applications, expand our capabilities and capacity to help
customers build custom applications, and broaden our
relationships with new hardware and systems integrator partners
serving the market.
|
|
|
|
Imaging. Our imaging solutions offer optical
character recognition technology to deliver highly accurate
document scanning and storage. We provide networked print
management and comprehensive PDF applications designed
specifically for business users. In addition, we offer
applications that combine network scanning, network print
management and PDF creation to quickly enable distribution of
documents to users desktops or to enterprise applications.
Our host of services includes software development toolkits for
independent software vendors. The imaging market is evolving to
include more networked solutions, mobile access to networked
solutions, and multi-function devices. We are investing to
improve mobile access to our networked products, expand our
distribution channels and embedding relationships, and expand
our language coverage.
|
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our extensive network of partners to design and deploy
innovative solutions for businesses and organizations around the
globe. We market and sell our products directly through a
dedicated sales force and through our
e-commerce
website and also through a global network of resellers,
including system integrators, independent software vendors,
value-added resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications
carriers and distributors.
We have built a world-class portfolio of intellectual property,
technologies, applications and solutions through both internal
development and acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue
opportunities to broaden these assets and expand our customer
base through acquisitions.
Confronted by dramatic increases in electronic information,
consumers, business personnel and healthcare professionals must
use a variety of resources to retrieve information, transcribe
patient records, conduct transactions and perform other
job-related functions. We believe that the power of our
solutions can transform the way people use the Internet,
telecommunications systems, electronic medical records, wireless
and mobile networks and related corporate infrastructure to
conduct business.
22
Strategy
In fiscal 2012, we will continue to focus on growth by providing
market-leading, value-added solutions for our customers and
partners through a broad set of technologies, service offerings
and channel capabilities. We will also continue to focus on
operating efficiencies, expense discipline and acquisition
synergies to improve gross margins and operating margins. We
intend to pursue growth through the following key elements of
our strategy:
|
|
|
|
|
Extend Technology Leadership. Our solutions
are recognized as among the best in their respective categories.
We intend to leverage our global research and development
organization and broad portfolio of technologies, applications
and intellectual property to foster technological innovation and
maintain customer preference for our solutions. We also intend
to invest in our engineering resources and seek new
technological advancements that further expand the addressable
markets for our solutions.
|
|
|
|
Broaden Expertise in Vertical
Markets. Businesses are increasingly turning to
Nuance for comprehensive solutions rather than for a single
technology product. We intend to broaden our expertise and
capabilities to deliver targeted solutions for a range of
industries including mobile device manufacturers, healthcare,
telecommunications, financial services and government
administration. We also intend to expand our global sales and
professional services capabilities to help our customers and
partners design, integrate and deploy innovative solutions.
|
|
|
|
Increase Subscription and Transaction Based Recurring
Revenue. We intend to increase our subscription
and transaction based offerings in our segments. The expansion
of our subscription or transaction based solutions will enable
us to deliver applications that our customers use on a repeat
basis, and pay for on a per use basis, providing us with the
opportunity to enjoy the benefits of recurring revenue streams.
|
|
|
|
Expand Global Presence. We intend to further
expand our international resources to better serve our global
customers and partners and to leverage opportunities in emerging
markets such as Asia and Latin America. We continue to add
regional executives and sales employees in different geographic
regions to better address demand for voice and language based
solutions and services.
|
|
|
|
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and
Partnerships. We have selectively pursued
strategic acquisitions to expand our technology, solutions and
resources to complement our organic growth. We have also formed
key partnerships with other important companies in our markets
of interest, and intend to continue to do so in the future where
it will enhance the value of our business. We have proven
experience in integrating businesses and technologies and in
delivering enhanced value to our customers, partners, employees
and shareholders. We intend to continue to pursue acquisitions
that enhance our solutions, serve specific vertical markets and
strengthen our technology portfolio.
|
Key
Metrics
In evaluating the financial condition and operating performance
of our business, management focuses on revenue, net income,
gross margins, operating margins and cash flow from operations.
A summary of these key financial metrics for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue increased by $199.8 million to
$1,318.7 million;
|
|
|
|
Net income improved by $57.3 million to $38.2 million;
|
|
|
|
Gross margins decreased by 1.3 percentage points to 62.1%;
|
|
|
|
Operating margins increased by 1.1 percentage point to
4.0%; and
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011 was $357.4 million, an increase of
$61.1 million from the prior fiscal year.
|
23
In addition to the above key financial metrics, we also focus on
certain non-financial performance indicators. A summary of these
key non-financial performance indicators as of and for the
period ended September 30, 2011, as compared to
September 30, 2010, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized line run-rate in our on-demand healthcare solutions
increased 19% to approximately 4.0 billion lines per year.
The annualized line run-rate is determined using billed
equivalent line counts in a given quarter, multiplied by four;
|
|
|
|
Estimated
3-year value
of on-demand contracts increased 17% to approximately
$1.3 billion. We determine this value by using our best
estimate of all anticipated future revenue streams under signed
on-demand contracts currently in place, whether or not they are
guaranteed through a minimum commitment clause. Our best
estimate is based on assumptions about launch dates, volumes and
renewal rates within the three year period. Most of these
contracts are priced by volume of usage and typically have no or
low minimum commitments. Actual revenue could vary from our
estimates due to factors such as cancellations, non-renewals or
volume fluctuations.
|
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Total
Revenues
The following tables show total revenues by product type and
revenue by geographic location, based on the location of our
customers, in dollars and percentage change (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
$
|
607.4
|
|
|
$
|
473.5
|
|
|
$
|
373.4
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
%
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
509.1
|
|
|
|
463.5
|
|
|
|
411.4
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
202.2
|
|
|
|
181.9
|
|
|
|
165.6
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,318.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,118.9
|
|
|
$
|
950.4
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
963.7
|
|
|
$
|
802.0
|
|
|
$
|
706.9
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
355.0
|
|
|
|
316.9
|
|
|
|
243.5
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,318.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,118.9
|
|
|
$
|
950.4
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The geographic split for fiscal 2011 was 73% of total revenue in
the United States and 27% internationally, as compared to 72% of
total revenue in the United States and 28% internationally for
the same period last year. The increase in the proportion of
revenue generated domestically was primarily due to
contributions from our Healthcare on-demand solutions, which are
sold predominantly in the United States.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The geographic split for fiscal 2010 was 72% of total revenue in
the United States and 28% internationally, as compared to 74% of
total revenue in the United States and 26% internationally for
the same period last year. The increase in the proportion of
revenue generated internationally was primarily due to
contributions from our acquisition of PSRS near the end of
fiscal 2008.
24
Product
and Licensing Revenue
Product and licensing revenue primarily consists of sales and
licenses of our technology. The following table shows product
and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of total
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
607.4
|
|
|
$
|
473.5
|
|
|
$
|
373.4
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
%
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
46.1
|
%
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The increase in product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2011,
as compared to fiscal 2010, consisted of a $50.1 million
increase in Mobile and Consumer revenue primarily driven by
$31.6 million of growth in sales of our embedded solutions,
and additional sales of $18.5 million of Dragon products.
Imaging revenue increased by $43.9 million, due to
increased revenue from our multi-functional peripheral
(MFP) products. Healthcare revenue increased by
$23.0 million resulting in part from continued strength in
Dragon Medical solutions, which represented $12.8 million
of the increase during the year. Enterprise on-premise license
sales increased by $16.9 million resulting from the
continued increase in global demand for our core speech
solutions. The growth in our product and licensing revenue
streams outpaced the relative growth of our other revenue types,
resulting in the 3.8 percentage point increase as a percent
of total revenue.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2010,
as compared to fiscal 2009, consisted of a $57.8 million
increase in Mobile and Consumer revenue primarily driven by
$43.5 million of growth in sales of our embedded solutions,
and a $14.4 million growth in sales of our Dragon product
resulting from our fourth quarter launch of Dragon Naturally
Speaking 11. Healthcare revenue increased by $37.7 million.
Imaging revenue increased $9.8 million primarily as a
result of our acquisitions of eCopy and X-Solutions in fiscal
2009. Enterprise revenue decreased $5.3 million primarily
due to the continued migration of customers to our on-demand
solutions. The growth in our product and licensing revenue
streams outpaced the relative growth of our other revenue types,
resulting in the 3.0 percentage point increase as a percent
of total revenue.
Professional
Services and Hosting Revenue
Professional services revenue primarily consists of consulting,
implementation and training services for customers. Hosting
revenue primarily relates to delivering hosted services, such as
medical transcription, automated customer care applications,
voice message transcription, and mobile search and
transcription, over a specified term. The following table shows
professional services and hosting revenue, in dollars and as a
percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
509.1
|
|
|
$
|
463.5
|
|
|
$
|
411.4
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2011, as compared to fiscal 2010, consisted of a
$40.1 million increase in Healthcare revenue primarily
driven by transactional volume growth in our on-demand
solutions. Mobile and Consumer revenue increased
$29.3 million as a result of growth of $19.2 million
in our connected mobile services and growth of
$10.1 million in professional services for our embedded
solutions.
25
Enterprise revenue decreased by $24.4 million, primarily
due to the decline of one on-demand customers volume. As a
percentage of total revenue, professional services and hosting
revenue decreased 2.8 percentage points as compared to the
corresponding period in the prior year, primarily due to the
strong growth in the product and licensing revenue relative to
professional services and hosting revenue.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, consisted of a
$31.8 million increase in Healthcare revenue resulting
largely from transactional volume growth in our on-demand
solutions. Mobile and Consumer revenue increased
$28.5 million primarily due to contributions from our
connected mobile services driven by the acquisition of SpinVox
in December 2009. Enterprise revenue decreased by
$9.4 million. As a percentage of total revenue,
professional services and hosting revenue decreased
1.9 percentage points as compared to the corresponding
period in the prior year, primarily due to the strong growth in
the product and licensing revenue relative to professional
services and hosting revenue.
Maintenance
and Support Revenue
Maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of technical
support and maintenance services. The following table shows
maintenance and support revenue, in dollars and as a percentage
of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
202.2
|
|
|
$
|
181.9
|
|
|
$
|
165.6
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for fiscal 2011,
as compared to fiscal 2010, was driven by growth in our product
and licensing sales. The increase included a $7.5 million
increase in Healthcare driven by Dragon Medical solutions, a
$5.5 million increase in Enterprise, and a
$5.3 million increase in Imaging with contributions from
our acquisition of Equitrac.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for fiscal 2010,
as compared to fiscal 2009, consisted primarily of a
$6.4 million increase in Enterprise revenue, driven by
continued organic growth, a $5.6 million increase in
Healthcare revenue as a result of the expansion of our current
installed base and a $2.4 million increase in Imaging
revenue primarily due to contributions from growth in sales of
our core imaging products and our acquisition of X-Solutions.
26
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
Cost of
Product and Licensing Revenue
Cost of product and licensing revenue primarily consists of
material and fulfillment costs, manufacturing and operations
costs and third-party royalty expenses. The following table
shows cost of product and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a
percentage of product and licensing revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
65.6
|
|
|
$
|
49.6
|
|
|
$
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
%
|
|
|
33.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of product and licensing revenue
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The increase in cost of product and licensing revenue for fiscal
2011, as compared to fiscal 2010, was primarily due to an
increase in hardware costs associated with increased revenues
from our MFP products in the Imaging segment. Gross margin
remained relatively flat during the period.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in cost of product and licensing revenue for fiscal
2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily due to a
$3.1 million increase in Mobile and Consumer costs driven
primarily by revenue growth in Dragon products resulting from
our fourth quarter launch of Dragon NaturallySpeaking 11, as
well a $4.6 million increase in Healthcare costs primarily
related to increased sales of Dragon Medical. The cost of
product and licensing revenue also increased as a result of a
$2.3 million increase in Imaging costs related to our eCopy
acquisition and a $2.4 million increase in Enterprise
costs. Gross margin remained relatively flat during the period.
Cost of
Professional Services and Hosting Revenue
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue primarily
consists of compensation for consulting personnel, outside
consultants and overhead, as well as the hardware and
communications fees that support our hosting solutions. The
following table shows cost of professional services and hosting
revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of professional services
and hosting revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
341.1
|
|
|
$
|
280.7
|
|
|
$
|
254.8
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
|
67.0
|
%
|
|
|
60.6
|
%
|
|
|
61.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The increase in cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for fiscal 2011, as compared to fiscal 2010, was due to
a $29.6 million increase in Healthcare costs primarily
related to growth in our on-demand solutions, and a
$16.8 million increase in stock-based compensation related
to our professional services personnel. Gross margin relative to
our professional services and hosting revenue decreased
6.4 percentage points primarily due to increased
stock-based compensation expense reducing gross margin by
3.3 percentage points and the remainder is primarily
related to volume and revenue declines from one on-demand
Enterprise customer.
27
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was
primarily due to a $35.9 million increase in Mobile and
Consumer costs driven by growth in our connected mobile
services, a $1.5 million increase in Healthcare and a
$1.4 million increase in Imaging costs driven by our eCopy
acquisition. These increases are partially offset by a
$12.8 million decrease in Enterprise costs. Gross margin
relative to our professional services and hosting revenue
increased 1.3 percentage points primarily due to growth in
our higher margin healthcare on-demand business and improved
professional services utilization rates.
Cost of
Maintenance and Support Revenue
Cost of maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of
compensation for product support personnel and overhead. The
following table shows cost of maintenance and support revenue,
in dollars and as a percentage of maintenance and support
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
38.1
|
|
|
$
|
31.3
|
|
|
$
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The increase in cost of maintenance and support revenue for
fiscal 2011, as compared to fiscal 2010, included
$2.5 million increase in costs due to higher volumes of
Enterprise application maintenance and support, a
$2.1 million increase in costs related to increased revenue
from our MFP products in our Imaging business, which included
the impact from our acquisition of Equitrac, and a
$1.4 million increase in stock-based compensation expense.
The increase in stock-based compensation expense reduced gross
margin by 0.7% during the period. Excluding impact from
stock-based compensation, gross margin remained relatively flat
during the period.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in cost of maintenance and support revenue for
fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily due to a
$1.8 million increase in Imaging costs as a result of our
eCopy and X-solutions acquisitions. Gross margin relative to our
maintenance and support revenue remained relatively constant
during the period.
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries,
benefits and overhead relating to engineering staff. The
following table shows research and development expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
$
|
179.4
|
|
|
$
|
152.1
|
|
|
$
|
116.8
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The increase in research and development expense for fiscal
2011, as compared to fiscal 2010, was attributable to a
$28.6 million increase in compensation expense. The
increase in compensation expense was driven by a
$14.9 million increase in stock-based compensation expense
and headcount growth as we continue to invest in our research
and development organization as well as additional headcount
from our acquisitions during the period. The
28
increase was offset by reimbursement of $5.9 million under
a new collaboration agreement signed during the period as
discussed in Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial
statements.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in research and development expense for fiscal
2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, primarily consisted of a
$16.7 million increase in services from a third party
related to the research collaboration agreements discussed in
Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements, a
$16.5 million increase in compensation expenses
attributable to the additional headcount and other resources
from our acquisitions during the period, and a $2.9 million
increase in infrastructure investment to support ongoing
research and development projects.
Sales and
Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and benefits,
commissions, advertising, direct mail, public relations,
tradeshow costs and other costs of marketing programs, travel
expenses associated with our sales organization and overhead.
The following table shows sales and marketing expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
306.4
|
|
|
$
|
266.2
|
|
|
$
|
217.8
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The increase in sales and marketing expense for fiscal 2011, as
compared to fiscal 2010, was primarily attributable to a
$21.7 million increase in compensation expense. The
increase in expense was driven primarily by additional headcount
to support growth and a $5.1 million increase in
stock-based compensation expense. Additionally, marketing and
channel program spending increased $14.0 million to drive
overall revenue growth.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in sales and marketing expense for fiscal 2010, as
compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily attributable to a
$35.4 million increase in compensation, including an
$11.1 million increase in stock-based compensation expense
driven primarily by the increase in grant values resulting from
increase in our stock price, and other variable costs such as
commissions and travel expenses. An $8.0 million increase
in marketing program spending, including marketing
communications and channel programs, related to new products
launched during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
General
and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense primarily consists of
personnel costs for administration, finance, human resources,
information systems, facilities and general management, fees for
external professional advisors including accountants and
attorneys, insurance, and provisions for doubtful accounts. The
following table shows general and administrative expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
147.6
|
|
|
$
|
122.1
|
|
|
$
|
100.5
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The increase in general and administrative expense for fiscal
2011, as compared to fiscal 2010, was primarily attributable to
a $14.5 million increase in compensation expense and a $9.1
million increase in legal costs associated with on-going
litigation and intellectual property maintenance. The increase
in compensation expense was driven primarily by additional
headcount due to operational growth and our acquisitions during
the period and an $8.9 million increase in stock-based
compensation expense.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in general and administrative expense for fiscal
2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily attributable to
$16.9 million increase in compensation driven primarily by
increase in stock-based compensation grant values resulting from
the increase in our stock price, $2.3 million increase in
other compensation expense and a $2.8 million increase in
legal costs associated with on-going litigation and intellectual
property maintenance. This increase is partially offset by a
reduction of $3.0 million in temporary employees and
professional services as a result of cost containment efforts
and acquisition related synergies.
Amortization
of Intangible Assets
Amortization of acquired patents and core and completed
technology are included in cost of revenue and the amortization
of acquired customer and contractual relationships, non-compete
agreements, acquired trade names and trademarks, and other
intangibles are included in operating expenses. Customer
relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis based upon
the pattern in which the economic benefits of the customer
relationships are being realized. Other identifiable intangible
assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives. Amortization expense was recorded as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
55.1
|
|
|
$
|
47.8
|
|
|
$
|
38.4
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
Operating expense
|
|
|
88.2
|
|
|
|
87.8
|
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense
|
|
$
|
143.3
|
|
|
$
|
135.6
|
|
|
$
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The increase in amortization of intangible assets for fiscal
2011, as compared to fiscal 2010, was primarily attributable to
the amortization of acquired technology and patent intangible
assets from our business acquisitions during fiscal 2011 and our
acquisitions of patents and technology from third-parties during
the fiscal 2010.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in amortization of intangible assets for fiscal
2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily attributable to
the amortization of acquired customer relationship and
technology and patent intangible assets from our acquisitions of
eCopy in September 2009 and SpinVox in December 2009. Fiscal
2010 amortization expense also increased over fiscal 2009 due to
our acquisition and licensing of certain technology from
third-parties during fiscal 2009 and 2010.
Based on our balance of amortizable intangible assets as of
September 30, 2011, and assuming no impairment or change in
useful lives, we expect amortization of intangible assets for
fiscal 2012 to be $141.7 million.
Acquisition-Related
Costs, Net
Acquisition-related costs include those costs related to
business and other acquisitions, including potential
acquisitions. These costs consist of (i) transition and
integration costs, including retention payments, transitional
30
employee costs and earn-out payments treated as compensation
expense, as well as the costs of integration-related services
provided by third-parties; (ii) professional service fees,
including direct third-party costs of the transaction and
post-acquisition legal and other professional service fees
associated with disputes and regulatory matters related to
acquired entities; and (iii) adjustments to acquisition-related
items that are required to be marked to fair value each
reporting period, such as contingent consideration, and other
items related to acquisitions for which the measurement period
has ended. Acquisition-related costs were recorded as follows
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Transition and integration costs
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
(75.0
|
)%
|
|
|
189.4
|
%
|
Professional service fees
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
Acquisition-related adjustments
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(600.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(97.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
$
|
21.9
|
|
|
$
|
30.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
(28.4
|
)%
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The decrease in acquisition-related costs, net for fiscal 2011,
as compared to fiscal 2010, was primarily driven by the
reduction in transition and integration costs. For fiscal 2010,
$8.9 million of transition and integration costs was driven
by our acquisitions of eCopy and SpinVox.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in acquisition-related costs, net for fiscal year
2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was largely a result of our
adoption of ASC 805, Business Combinations, on
October 1, 2009, which requires that transaction costs
related to acquisitions be expensed as incurred. We recognized
approximately $9.4 million in transaction costs, included
within professional service fees above, during fiscal 2010 that
would have been included as part of the consideration
transferred and capitalized in periods prior to our adoption of
ASC 805. This includes $2.2 million that had been
capitalized as of September 30, 2009 related to costs
incurred in prior periods that was required to be expensed upon
our adoption of ASC 805. The remainder of the increase was
primarily attributable to an $8.9 million increase in
transition and integration costs primarily driven by our
acquisitions of eCopy and SpinVox.
31
Restructuring
and Other Charges, Net
The following table sets forth the activity relating to the
restructuring accruals included in Restructuring and Other
Charges, net, in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
Non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
Non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For fiscal 2011, we recorded net restructuring and other charges
of $23.0 million, which consisted primarily of an
$11.7 million impairment charge related to our Dictaphone
trade name resulting from a recent change in our Healthcare
marketing strategy under which we plan to consolidate our brands
and will no longer be using the Dictaphone trade name in our new
product offerings. In addition, we recorded a $9.1 million
charge related to the elimination of approximately
200 personnel across multiple functions primarily to
eliminate duplicative positions as a result of businesses
acquired during the year and a $1.9 million charge related
to the elimination or consolidation of excess facilities.
For fiscal 2010, we recorded net restructuring and other charges
of $18.7 million, which consisted primarily of
$9.6 million related to the elimination of approximately
175 personnel across multiple functions within our company,
including acquired entities, a $6.8 million write-off of
previously capitalized patent defense costs as a result of
unsuccessful litigation and $2.1 million of contract
termination costs. Excluding the $6.8 million write-off of
previously capitalized patent defense costs, restructuring
charges increased for fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009,
as a result of the adoption of the business combinations
guidance in ASC 805. Under the previous accounting
guidance, restructuring costs related to certain
post-acquisition activities to integrate acquired companies were
generally recorded at the date of acquisition, while the
guidance in ASC 805 generally requires that these costs be
recorded to the acquiring companys statement of operations
as the activities are undertaken.
For fiscal 2009, we recorded restructuring and other charges of
$5.4 million, of which $5.3 million related to the
elimination of approximately 220 personnel across multiple
functions within our company.
32
Other
Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) consists of interest income, interest
expense, gain (loss) from security price guarantee derivatives,
gain (loss) from foreign exchange, and gains (losses) from other
non-operating activities. The following table shows other income
(expense) in dollars and as a percentage of total revenue
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
166.7
|
%
|
|
|
(66.6
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(36.7
|
)
|
|
|
(41.0
|
)
|
|
|
(47.3
|
)
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
89.7
|
%
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(22.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
The decrease in interest expense for fiscal 2011, as compared to
fiscal 2010, was primarily driven by decreased interest costs as
a result of lower rates on our outstanding variable rate
borrowings. The increase in other income, net was primarily
driven by a $9.3 million increase in gains on our security
price guarantee derivatives. This was offset by a decrease in
foreign exchange gains of $4.7 million resulting from our
implementation of a hedging program in fiscal 2011 to reduce our
exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The change in other income, net for fiscal 2010, as compared to
fiscal 2009, was primarily driven by changes in foreign exchange
as a result of the U.S. dollar and British pound
strengthening against the euro primarily in the first three
quarters of fiscal 2010, offset by a one time gain taken in 2009
relating to the foreign currency contracts that were not
designated as hedges in fiscal 2009. Interest income and
interest expense were lower due to lower prevailing market rates.
(Benefit)
provision for Income Taxes
The following table shows the provision for income taxes and the
effective income tax rate (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
$
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
18.0
|
|
|
$
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
(145.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(55.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(27.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,693.3
|
)%
|
|
|
192.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
Our effective income tax rate was (27.4)% and (1,693.3)% for
fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in the tax
provision from 2010 to 2011 was primarily related to a one-time
tax benefit recorded in connection with the Equitrac acquisition
for which a net deferred tax liability was recorded in purchase
accounting, resulting in a release of our valuation allowance of
$34.7 million and therefore a tax benefit during the year. The
decrease in the tax provision was also due to a release of
$10.6 million of our valuation allowance associated with
the change in characterization of a previously acquired
intangible asset from an indefinite life asset to a finite life
asset during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. These deferred
tax benefits were offset by a $21.4 million increase in our
current income tax provision primarily driven by higher U.S.
taxable income.
33
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
Our effective income tax rate was (1,693.3)% and 192.3% for
fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in the rate was
due partially to the adoption of ASC 805, which no longer
requires the release of the valuation allowance on acquired tax
assets to be included as a component of goodwill. Under the new
standard, such benefits are included in the statements of
operations as a reduction to the provision for income taxes.
Also contributing to the decrease was an $8.0 million tax
provision recorded during fiscal 2009 upon our election to treat
the eScription acquisition as an asset purchase, as well as a
$3.2 million tax provision recorded during fiscal 2009 as a
result of a Massachusetts state tax law enactment relating to
the utilization of net operating losses. The decreases were
partially offset by an increase in the fiscal 2010 foreign tax
provision resulting from increased foreign profits in certain
jurisdictions.
SEGMENT
ANALYSIS
Prior to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company operated
in one reportable segment as the Chief Operating Decision Maker
(CODM) regularly reviewed revenue data by market
group, while reviewing gross margins, operating margins, and
other measures of income or loss on a consolidated basis to
manage the business, allocate resources and assess performance.
Effective in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, our CODM
commenced regular reviews of the operating results including
measures of profitability of each of our market groups;
Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer, Enterprise and Imaging. As a
result, we have changed our segment structure and identified our
four customer-facing market groups as reportable segments as
defined by ASC 280, Segment Reporting, based on the
level of financial information now regularly reviewed by the
CODM in allocating resources and assessing performance of each
market group.
The Healthcare segment is primarily engaged in voice and
language recognition for healthcare information management
offered both by licensing and on-demand services. The Mobile and
Consumer segment is primarily engaged in sales of voice and
language solutions that are embedded in a device (such as a cell
phone, car or tablet computer) or installed on a personal
computer. Our Enterprise segment offers voice and language
solutions by licensing as well as on-demand solutions hosted by
us that are designed to help companies better support,
understand and communicate with their customers. The Imaging
segment sells document capture and print management solutions
that are embedded in copiers and multi-function printers as well
as packaged software for document management.
Segment revenues include revenue related to acquisitions,
primarily from the fiscal 2010 eCopy transaction and the fiscal
2011 purchases of Equitrac and SVOX that would otherwise have
been recognized but for the purchase accounting treatment of
these transactions. Segment revenues also include revenue that
we would have otherwise recognized had we not acquired
intellectual property and other assets from the same customer
during the same quarter. We include these revenues and the
related cost of revenues to allow for more complete comparisons
to the financial results of historical operations,
forward-looking guidance and the financial results of peer
companies and in assessing management performance. Segment
profit reflects the direct controllable costs of each segment
together with an allocation of sales and corporate marketing
expenses, and certain research and development project costs
that benefit multiple product offerings.
Segment profit is an important measure used for evaluating
performance and for decision-making purposes. Segment profit
represents income from operations excluding stock-based
compensation, amortization of intangible assets, acquisition
related costs, net, restructuring and other charges, net, costs
associated with intellectual property collaboration agreements,
other income (expense), net and certain unallocated corporate
expenses. Segment profit includes an adjustment for
acquisition-related revenues and cost of revenues which includes
revenue from acquisitions that would have otherwise been
recognized but for the purchase accounting treatment of these
transactions. We believe that these adjustments allow for more
complete comparisons to the financial results of the historical
operations.
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2011 vs
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Segment Revenues(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
526.8
|
|
|
$
|
449.2
|
|
|
$
|
392.0
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
393.3
|
|
|
|
309.5
|
|
|
|
234.1
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
32.2
|
%
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
296.4
|
|
|
|
296.2
|
|
|
|
310.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
Imaging
|
|
|
177.4
|
|
|
|
140.7
|
|
|
|
73.6
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
|
|
91.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues
|
|
$
|
1,393.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,195.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,010.3
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
Less: acquisition related revenues
|
|
|
(75.2
|
)
|
|
|
(76.7
|
)
|
|
|
(59.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,318.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,118.9
|
|
|
$
|
950.4
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
269.4
|
|
|
$
|
227.4
|
|
|
$
|
184.8
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
170.9
|
|
|
|
120.0
|
|
|
|
108.0
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
%
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
63.3
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
|
|
|
89.6
|
|
|
|
(23.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)%
|
Imaging
|
|
|
69.1
|
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
86.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment profit
|
|
$
|
572.7
|
|
|
$
|
485.3
|
|
|
$
|
412.2
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Segment revenues differ from reported revenues due to
certain revenue adjustments related to acquisitions that would
otherwise have been recognized but for the purchase accounting
treatment of the business combinations. Segment revenues also
include revenue that the business would have otherwise
recognized had we not acquired intellectual property and other
assets from the same customer. These revenues are included to
allow for more complete comparisons to the financial results of
historical operations and in evaluating management performance.
(b) Segment profit reflects the direct controllable costs
of each segment together with an allocation of sales and
corporate marketing expenses, and certain research and
development project costs that benefit multiple product
offerings. The costs of acquisition related revenue adjustments
are included to allow for more complete comparisons of the
historical operations.
Segment
Revenue
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare segment revenue increased by $77.6 million,
primarily attributable to revenue growth in both licenses and
on-demand solutions. On-demand revenue increased by
$47.2 million due to increased transactional volume and
product and licensing revenue increased by $20.5 million
due to volume and continued strong demand of our Healthcare
license offerings resulting in part from continued strength in
Dragon Medical solutions.
|
|
|
|
Mobile and Consumer segment revenue increased by
$83.8 million. Our product and licensing revenue grew
$57.4 million primarily related to growth of
$39.3 million in our embedded handset and automotive
products and $18.1 million in our Dragon products. Our
professional services and hosting revenue grew
$24.5 million related to both the increased volume of
transactions in our connected mobile services as well as
professional services revenue to support the implementation of
recent handset and automobile design wins.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise segment revenue remained flat from fiscal 2010 to
fiscal 2011. Our product and licensing revenue grew
$18.8 million and maintenance and support revenue grew
$6.4 million resulting from the continued increase in
global demand for our core speech solutions. These increases
were offset by a decline of $25.0 million in our
professional services and hosting revenue, primarily
attributable to the decline in volume from one on-demand
customer.
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
Imaging segment revenue increased by $36.7 million,
primarily attributable to growth in sales from our MFP products,
which includes the impact from our acquisition of Equitrac.
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare segment revenue increased by $57.2 million,
primarily attributable to revenue growth in licenses and
on-demand solutions. On-demand revenue increased
$25.5 million due to increased transactional volume and
product and licensing revenue increased $20.7 million due
to volume and continued strong demand of our Healthcare license
offerings.
|
|
|
|
Mobile and Consumer segment revenue increased by
$75.4 million, primarily driven by growth in product and
licenses and hosting services for
voicemail-to-text.
Product and licensing revenue increased $37.7 million and
hosting revenue increased $30.5 million.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise segment revenue decreased by $14.4 million
mainly due to decline in volume from one on-demand customer.
|
|
|
|
Imaging segment revenue increased by $67.1 million, a
result of contributions from our acquisitions of eCopy, Inc. and
growth in our core imaging solutions. Product and licensing
revenue increased $55.8 million.
|
Segment
Profit
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare segment profit in fiscal 2011 increased 18.5% over
fiscal 2010, driven primarily by segment revenue growth of
17.3%. Segment profit increased by 0.5 percentage points as
a result of operating expense leverage and a $5.9 million
reimbursement under a new collaboration agreement signed during
the period as discussed in Note 2 to the audited
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
Mobile and Consumer segment profit in fiscal 2011 increased
42.4% over fiscal 2010, resulting in part from the 27.1%
increase in segment revenue. Segment profit margin in fiscal
2011 improved 4.7 percentage points from 38.8% in fiscal
2010 to 43.5% in fiscal 2011. The segment profit margin
improvements were driven primarily by embedded and mobile
services gross margin improvements, and from leverage in
research and development and selling and marketing expenses.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise segment profit in fiscal 2011 decreased 23.1% over
fiscal 2010, while sales were essentially flat. Segment profit
margin in fiscal 2011 declined 6.4 percentage points from
27.8% in fiscal 2010 to 21.4% in fiscal 2011. This decrease was
driven by decreased volume and revenue from one on-demand
customer resulting in a 3.8 percentage point decrease in segment
profit and increased spending in research and development
contributed to a 1.7 percentage point decrease in segment
profit.
|
|
|
|
Imaging segment profit in fiscal 2011 increased 24.3% over
fiscal 2010, driven primarily by the 26.1% increase in sales.
Segment profit margin in fiscal 2011 remained relatively flat at
39.0% in fiscal 2011 compared to 39.5% in fiscal 2010.
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare segment profit in fiscal 2010 increased 23.1% over
fiscal 2009, driven primarily by segment revenue growth of
14.6%. Segment profit margin in fiscal 2010 improved
3.5 percentage points from 47.1% in fiscal 2009 to 50.6% in
fiscal 2010, driven primarily by improvements in our services
gross margin.
|
|
|
|
Mobile and Consumer segment profit in fiscal 2010 increased
11.1% over fiscal 2009, resulting in part from the 32.2%
increase in segment revenue. Segment profit margin in fiscal
2010 decreased 7.3 percentage points from 46.1% in fiscal
2009 to 38.8% in fiscal 2010. The decrease was driven primarily
by increased cost of professional and hosting revenue due to our
acquisition of SpinVox in December 2009.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise segment profit in fiscal 2010 decreased 8.1% over
fiscal 2009. Segment profit margin in fiscal 2010 declined
1.0 percentage points from 28.8% in fiscal 2009 to 27.8% in
fiscal 2010. Increased sales and marketing expense contributed
to the decrease in segment profit.
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
Imaging segment profit in fiscal 2010 increased 86.6% over
fiscal 2009, driven primarily by the 91.2% increase in segment
revenue. Segment profit margin in fiscal 2010 decreased
1.0 percentage point from 40.5% in fiscal 2009 to 39.5% in
fiscal 2010. The decrease was driven primarily by increased
costs related to our eCopy acquisition.
|
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $447.2 million as of
September 30, 2011, a decrease of $69.4 million as
compared to $516.6 million as of September 30, 2010.
Our working capital, which at September 30, 2011 included
short-term marketable securities of $31.2 million, was
$379.9 million compared to $459.2 million of working
capital at September 30, 2010. Working capital at
September 30, 2010 excluded $28.3 million of
marketable securities that were classified as non-current. Cash
and cash equivalents held by our international operations
totaled $61.7 million and $40.5 million at
September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We expect the
cash held overseas will continue to be used for our
international operations and therefore do not anticipate
repatriating these funds. If we were to repatriate these
amounts, we do not believe that the withholding taxes payable as
a result would have a material impact on our liquidity. As of
September 30, 2011, our total accumulated deficit was
$243.1 million. We do not expect our accumulated deficit to
impact our future ability to operate the business given our
strong cash and operating cash flow positions.
On October 6, 2011, we acquired Swype, Inc., a provider of
software that allows users to type by sliding a finger or stylus
from letter to letter, for approximately $77.5 million in
cash, plus $25.0 million in contingent payments, due in
eighteen months subject to certain conditions.
On October 24, 2011, we sold $690 million of
2.75% Convertible Debentures due November 1, 2031.
Total proceeds, net of debt issuance costs of approximately
$14.0 million, were $676.0 million. We used
$200 million of the proceeds to repurchase 8.5 million
shares of our common stock. Interest at 2.75% per year is
payable in cash semiannually. We believe our current cash and
cash equivalents and marketable securities, together with the
proceeds of our recent convertible debt issuance are sufficient
to meet our operating needs for at least the next twelve months.
Cash
provided by operating activities
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2011 was
$357.4 million, an increase of $61.1 million, or 21%,
as compared to cash provided by operating activities of
$296.3 million for fiscal 2010. The increase was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $90.0 million in cash flows resulting from
an increase in net income, exclusive of non-cash adjustment
items which include a one-time non-cash tax benefit adjustment
of $34.7 million reducing the valuation allowance on
deferred tax assets as a result of the Equitrac acqusition;
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash flows of $16.8 million from an overall
increase in deferred revenue;
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $45.6 million in cash flows generated by
changes in working capital excluding deferred revenue, primarily
driven by an 18.0 million ($23.4 million
equivalent) payment in fiscal 2011 for a fixed obligation
assumed in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox and a
$24.8 million decrease in cash flows due to changes in
accounts receivable.
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2010 was
$296.3 million, an increase of $37.6 million, or 15%,
as compared to cash provided by operating activities of
$258.7 million for fiscal 2009. The increase was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash resulting from a decrease in net loss, after
excluding non-cash adjustment items, of approximately
$45.1 million;
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash of $40.2 million from deferred revenue
primarily attributable to billings of our eCopy imaging
solutions;
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash of $34.3 million from accounts
receivable primarily attributable to improved collection efforts
and continuous DSO improvements in 2009, while maintaining
consistent receivables balances in 2010; and
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash from accounts payable and accrued expenses of
$23.6 million primarily attributable to the timing of cash
payments under our normal operating cycles.
|
Cash used
in investing activities
Fiscal
2011 compared to Fiscal 2010
Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2011 was
$425.9 million, an increase of $110.3 million, or 35%,
as compared to cash used in investing activities of
$315.6 million for fiscal 2010. The net increase was
primarily driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash outflows of $198.6 million for
acquisitions in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010;
|
|
|
|
A decrease in net cash outflows of $34.4 million to
purchase marketable securities net of proceeds; and
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash outflows of $39.3 million related to
restricted cash. During fiscal 2011, we received
$17.2 million in cash upon satisfaction of the restriction
of our restricted cash. During fiscal 2010, we used
$22.1 million for an irrevocable standby letter of credit
account for a fixed obligation in connection with our
acquisition of SpinVox in 2010.
|
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2010 was
$315.6 million, an increase of $131.0 million, or 71%,
as compared to cash used in investing activities of
$184.6 million for fiscal 2009. The net increase was
primarily driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash payments related to acquisitions of
$104.6 million, primarily driven by the cash paid for the
acquisition of SpinVox and other fiscal 2010 business
acquisitions, the PSRS deferred acquisitions payments, and the
Phonetic earn-out payment;
|
|
|
|
Cash payments of $33.5 million related to our purchase of
marketable securities in fiscal 2010;
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $50.6 million in cash used for acquisitions
of technology; and
|
|
|
|
The use of $22.1 million in restricted cash related to cash
placed in an irrevocable standby letter of credit account for a
fixed obligation in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox.
|
Cash
provided by financing activities
Fiscal
2011 compared to Fiscal 2010
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2011 was
$6.0 million, a decrease of $3.9 million, or 39%, as
compared to cash provided by financing activities of
$9.9 million for fiscal 2010. The change was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $16.5 million cash benefit resulting from
excess tax benefits on employee equity awards;
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash outflows of $14.9 million to net share
settle employee equity awards, due to an increase in the number
of shares vested and an increase in the intrinsic value of the
shares vested as a result of the overall increase in our stock
price in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010;
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash inflows of $12.4 million from the sale
of our common stock. During fiscal 2010, warrants to purchase
2.5 million of our shares were exercised, whereas we had no
warrant activity in fiscal 2011; and
|
38
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2010 was
$9.9 million, a decrease of $179.5 million, or 95%, as
compared to cash provided by financing activities of
$189.4 million for fiscal 2009. The change was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $183.2 million in cash proceeds from the sale
of our common stock. During fiscal 2009, we sold
17.4 million shares of our common stock, together with
warrants to purchase an additional 3.9 million shares of
our common stock, for net proceeds of $175.1 million;
|
|
|
|
An increase of $11.0 million in cash payments to net share
settle employee equity awards, due to an increase in the number
of shares vested and an increase in the intrinsic value of the
shares vested as a result of the overall increase in our stock
price in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009; and
|
|
|
|
An increase of $9.7 million in cash proceeds from the
issuance of common stock upon exercise of employee stock options
and pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
We have $250 million of 2.75% convertible senior debentures
due in 2027 (the 2027 Debentures) that were issued
on August 13, 2007 in a private placement to Citigroup
Global Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. The 2027
Debentures bear an interest rate of 2.75% per annum, payable
semi-annually in arrears beginning on February 15, 2008,
and mature on August 15, 2027 subject to the right of the
holders of the 2027 Debentures to require us to redeem the 2027
Debentures on August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. The related
debt discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized to
interest expense using the effective interest rate method
through August 2014. The 2027 Debentures are general senior
unsecured obligations, ranking equally in right of payment to
all of our existing and future unsecured, unsubordinated
indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any indebtedness
that is contractually subordinated to the 2027 Debentures. The
2027 Debentures are effectively subordinated to our secured
indebtedness to the extent of the value of the collateral
securing such indebtedness and are structurally subordinated to
indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries. If
converted, the principal amount of the 2027 Debentures is
payable in cash and any amounts payable in excess of the
$250 million principal amount, will (based on an initial
conversion rate, which represents an initial conversion price of
$19.47 per share, subject to adjustment as defined therein) be
paid in cash or shares of our common stock, at our election,
only in the following circumstances and to the following extent:
(i) on any date during any fiscal quarter beginning after
September 30, 2007 (and only during such fiscal quarter) if
the closing sale price of our common stock was more than 120% of
the then current conversion price for at least 20 trading days
in the period of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the
last trading day of the previous fiscal quarter;
(ii) during the five consecutive
business-day
period following any five consecutive
trading-day
period in which the trading price for $1,000 principal amount of
the Debentures for each day during such five
trading-day
period was less than 98% of the closing sale price of our common
stock multiplied by the then current conversion rate;
(iii) upon the occurrence of specified corporate
transactions, as described in the indenture for the 2027
Debentures; and (iv) at the option of the holder at any
time on or after February 15, 2027. Additionally, we may
redeem the 2027 Debentures, in whole or in part, on or after
August 20, 2014 at par plus accrued and unpaid interest;
each holder shall have the right, at such holders option,
to require us to repurchase all or any portion of the 2027
Debentures held by such holder on August 15, 2014,
August 15, 2017 and August 15, 2022. Upon conversion,
we will pay the principal amount in cash and any amounts payable
in excess of the $250 million principal amount will be paid in
cash or shares of our common stock, at our election. If we
undergo a fundamental change (as described in the indenture for
the 2027 Debentures) prior to maturity, holders will have the
option to require us to repurchase all or any portion of their
debentures for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the debentures to be purchased plus any accrued and
unpaid interest, including any additional interest to, but
excluding, the repurchase date. As of September 30, 2010,
no conversion triggers were met. If the conversion triggers were
met, we could be required to repay all or some of the principal
amount in cash prior to the maturity date.
39
Credit
Facility
We have a credit facility which consists of a $75 million
revolving credit line including letters of credit, a
$355 million term loan entered into on March 31, 2006,
a $90 million term loan entered into on April 5, 2007
and a $225 million term loan entered into on
August 24, 2007 (the Credit Facility). In July
2011, we entered into agreements to amend and restate our
existing Credit Facility. Of the approximately
$638.5 million remaining term loan, lenders representing
$493.2 million elected to extend the maturity date by three
years to March 31, 2016. The remaining $145.3 million
in term loans are due March 2013. In addition, lenders
participating in the revolving credit facility have chosen to
extend the maturity date by three years to March 31, 2015.
As of September 30, 2011, $636.9 million remained
outstanding under the term loans, there were $15.4 million
of letters of credit issued under the revolving credit line and
there were no other outstanding borrowings under the revolving
credit line.
The Credit Facility contains covenants, including, among other
things, covenants that restrict our ability and those of our
subsidiaries to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or
permit liens on assets, enter into sale-leaseback transactions,
make loans or investments, sell assets, make certain
acquisitions, pay dividends, or repurchase stock. The agreement
also contains events of default, including failure to make
payments of principal or interest, failure to observe covenants,
breaches of representations and warranties, defaults under
certain other material indebtedness, failure to satisfy material
judgments, a change of control and certain insolvency events. As
of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the
covenants under the Credit Facility.
Under terms of the amended Credit Agreement, interest is payable
monthly at a rate equal to the applicable margin plus, at our
option, either (a) the base rate which is the higher of the
corporate base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal
funds rate plus 0.50% per annum or (b) LIBOR (equal to
(i) the British Bankers Association Interest
Settlement Rates for deposits in U.S. dollars divided by
(ii) one minus the statutory reserves applicable to such
borrowing). The applicable margin for the borrowings is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Base Rate Margin
|
|
LIBOR Margin
|
|
Term loans maturing March 2013
|
|
0.75% - 1.50%(a)
|
|
1.75% - 2.50%(a)
|
Term loans maturing March 2016
|
|
2.00%
|
|
3.00%
|
Revolving facility due March 2015
|
|
1.25% - 2.25%(b)
|
|
2.25% - 3.25%(b)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The margin is determined based on our leverage ratio and credit
rating at the date the interest rates are reset on the Term
Loans. |
|
(b) |
|
The margin is determined based on our leverage ratio and credit
rating at the date the interest rates are reset on the Revolving
credit line. |
At September 30, 2011 the applicable margins were 1.75%,
with an effective rate of 1.98%, on the remaining balance of
$145.0 maturing in March 2013 and 3.00%, with an effective rate
of 3.23%, on the remaining balance of $492.0 maturing in March
2016. We are required to pay a commitment fee for unutilized
commitments under the revolving credit facility at a rate
ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% per annum, based upon our leverage
ratio. As of September 30, 2011, the commitment fee rate
was 0.375%.
We capitalized debt issuance costs related to the Credit
Facility and are amortizing the costs to interest expense using
the effective interest rate method through March 2013 for costs
associated with the unextended portion of the term loan, through
March 2015 for costs associated with the revolving credit
facility and March 2016 for the remainder of the balance. As of
September 30, 2011 and 2010, the ending unamortized
deferred financing fees were $5.8 million and
$5.8 million, respectively, and are included in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Credit Facility amendment extended the payment terms on a
portion of the loan. Principal is due in quarterly installments
of 0.25% of the then outstanding balance through the original
maturity date of March 2013 for $145.3 million,
representing the portion of the loan that was not extended.
Principal payments on the extended loan of $493.2 are due in
quarterly installments of 0.25% of the then outstanding balance
through March 2016, at which point the remaining balance becomes
due. In addition, an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined
in the Credit Facility, is payable in the first quarter of each
fiscal year, based on the excess cash flow generated in the
previous fiscal year. We have not generated excess cash flows in
any period and no additional payments are required. We will
continue to
40
evaluate the extent to which a payment is due in the first
quarter of future fiscal years based on excess cash flow
generation. At the current time, we are unable to predict the
amount of the outstanding principal, if any, that may be
required to be repaid in future fiscal years pursuant to the
excess cash flow sweep provisions. Any term loan borrowings not
paid through the baseline repayment, the excess cash flow sweep,
or any other mandatory or optional payments that we may make,
will be repaid upon maturity. If only the baseline repayments
are made, the annual aggregate principal amount of the term
loans repaid would be as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
6,346
|
|
2013
|
|
|
148,385
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,804
|
|
2015
|
|
|
4,756
|
|
2016
|
|
|
472,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
636,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our obligations under the Credit Facility are unconditionally
guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions, each of our
existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The Credit Facility and the guarantees thereof are
secured by first priority liens and security interests in the
following: 100% of the capital stock of substantially all of our
domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the outstanding voting equity
interests and 100% of the non-voting equity interests of
first-tier foreign subsidiaries, all our material tangible and
intangible assets and those of the guarantors, and any present
and future intercompany debt. The Credit Facility also contains
provisions for mandatory prepayments of outstanding term loans
upon receipt of the following, and subject to certain
exceptions: 100% of net cash proceeds from asset sales, 100% of
net cash proceeds from issuance or incurrence of debt, and 100%
of extraordinary receipts. We may voluntarily prepay borrowings
under the Credit Facility without premium or penalty other than
breakage costs, as defined with respect to LIBOR-based loans.
The 2027 Debentures provide the holders with the right to
convert the debt to shares of our common stock under certain
specified conditions, including triggers related to our share
price. If the closing share price of our stock exceeds 120% of
the initial conversion price of approximately $19.47 for the
periods defined in the agreement, the holders have the right to
convert the debentures. Our stock price has been trading above
$23.00 per share for extended periods beginning in October 2011,
and therefore it is possible that the holders of the 2027
Debentures will have the right to convert their holdings at some
point during fiscal 2012. If the holders make this election, the
principal amount of the 2027 Debentures is payable in cash and
any amounts payable in excess of the $250 million principal
amount will be paid in cash or shares of our common stock, at
our election. Given that the debentures are traded in a
secondary market and the current market value of the 2027
Debentures exceeds the value that the holders would receive upon
conversion, we believe that the holders may not have a
significant economic incentive to exercise their conversion
option prior to August 2014.
We believe that cash flows from future operations in addition to
cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities on-hand will
be sufficient to meet our working capital, investing, financing
and contractual obligations and the contingent payments for
acquisitions, if any are realized, as they become due for at
least the next twelve months. We also believe that in the event
future operating results are not as planned, that we could take
actions, including restructuring actions and other cost
reduction initiatives, to reduce operating expenses to levels
which, in combination with expected future revenue, will
continue to generate sufficient operating cash flow. In the
event that these actions are not effective in generating
operating cash flows we may be required to issue equity or debt
securities on terms that may be less favorable.
41
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
Contractual
Obligations
The following table outlines our contractual payment obligations
as of September 30, 2011 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
and 2014
|
|
|
and 2016
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Credit Facility(1)
|
|
$
|
636.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
153.2
|
|
|
$
|
477.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible Senior Debentures(2)
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable under Credit Facility(1)
|
|
|
74.3
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable under 2.75% Convertible Senior
Debentures(3)
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter of Credit(4)
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligations and other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
129.4
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
Other lease obligations associated with the closing of duplicate
facilities related to restructurings and acquisitions
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension, minimum funding requirement(5)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Commitments(6)
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration agreements(7)
|
|
|
54.3
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities assumed(8)
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
1,204.4
|
|
|
$
|
109.1
|
|
|
$
|
529.7
|
|
|
$
|
540.3
|
|
|
$
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest is due and payable monthly under the Credit Facility,
and principal is paid on a quarterly basis. The amounts included
as interest payable in this table are based on the effective
interest rate as of September 30, 2011 related to the
Credit Facility. |
|
(2) |
|
Holders of the 2.75% Senior Convertible Debentures have the
right to require us to repurchase the debentures on
August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest is due and payable semi-annually under the 2.75%
convertible senior debentures. |
|
(4) |
|
We have placed EUR 5.0 million ($6.8 million based on
the September 30, 2011 exchange rate) in an irrevocable
standby letter of credit account for payment of a fixed
obligation assumed in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox. |
|
(5) |
|
Our U.K. pension plan has a minimum annual funding requirement
of £859,900 (approximately $1.3 million based on the
exchange rate at September 30, 2011) for each of the
next 3 years, through fiscal 2014. |
|
(6) |
|
These amounts include non-cancelable purchase commitments for
inventory in the normal course of business to fulfill
customers orders currently scheduled in our backlog. |
|
(7) |
|
Payments under the research collaboration agreements are payable
in cash or common stock at our option. |
|
(8) |
|
Obligations include assumed long-term liabilities relating to
restructuring programs initiated by the predecessor companies
prior to our acquisition of SpeechWorks International, Inc. in
August 2003, and our acquisition of Former Nuance in September
2005. These restructuring programs related to the closing of two
facilities with lease terms set to expire in 2016 and 2012,
respectively. Total contractual obligations under these two
leases are $21.0 million. As of September 30, 2011, we
have
sub-leased
certain of the office space related to these two facilities to
unrelated third parties. Total sublease income under contractual
terms is expected to be $8.3 million, which ranges from
$1.5 million to $3.0 million on an annualized basis
through 2016. |
The gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of
September 30, 2011 was $14.9 million. We do not expect
a significant change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits
within the next 12 months. We estimate that none of
42
this amount will be paid within the next year and we are
currently unable to reasonably estimate the timing of payments
for the remainder of the liability.
Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have agreed
to make contingent cash payments to the former shareholders of
certain of the acquired companies. The following represents the
contingent cash payments that we may be required to make.
In connection with our acquisition of SNAPin Software, Inc.
(SNAPin), we agreed to make a contingent earn-out
payment of up to $45.0 million in cash to be paid, if at
all, based on the business achieving certain performance targets
that are measurable from the acquisition date to
December 31, 2009. In April 2010, the Company and the
former shareholders of SNAPin agreed on a final earn-out payment
of $21.2 million and we issued 593,676 shares of our
common stock, valued at $10.2 million, as our first payment
under the earn-out agreement. The remaining balance of
$11.0 million was paid in cash in October, 2011 and is
included in short-term liabilities as of September 30, 2011.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, Inc.
(Vocada), we agreed to make contingent earn-out
payments of up to $21.0 million, payable in stock, or cash,
solely at our discretion, upon the achievement of certain
financial targets measured over defined periods through
December 31, 2010. We have notified the former shareholders
of Vocada that the financial targets for all periods were not
achieved. In December 2010, the former shareholders filed a
demand for arbitration in accordance with their rights under the
merger agreement. As of September 30, 2011, we have not
recorded any obligation relative to these earn-out provisions.
Financial
Instruments
We use financial instruments to manage our foreign exchange
risk. We follow Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting
Standards Codification 815 (ASC 815), Derivatives
and Hedging, for our derivative instruments.
We operate our business in countries throughout the world and
transact business in various foreign currencies. Our foreign
currency exposures typically arise from transactions denominated
in currencies other than the local functional currency of our
operations. During fiscal 2011, we commenced a program that
primarily utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to offset
the risks associated with foreign currency denominated assets
and liabilities. We established this program so that gains and
losses from remeasurement or settlement of these assets and
liabilities are offset by gains or losses on the foreign
currency forward contracts thus mitigating the risks and
volatility associated with our foreign currency transactions.
Generally, we enter into contracts with terms of 90 days or
less, and at September 30, 2011 we had outstanding
contracts with a total notional value of $75.7 million.
From time to time we will enter into agreements that allow us to
issue shares of our common stock as part or all of the
consideration related to partnering and technology acquisition
activities. Generally these shares are issued subject to
security price guarantees which are accounted for as
derivatives. We have determined that these instruments would not
be considered equity instruments if they were freestanding. The
security price guarantees require payment from either us to the
third party, or from the third party to us, based upon the
difference between the price of our common stock on the issue
date and an average price of our common stock approximately six
months following the issue date. Changes in the fair value of
these security price guarantees are reported in earnings in each
period as non-operating income (expense) with other income, net.
During the year ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we
recorded $13.2 million and $4.0 million, respectively
of gains associated with these contracts and received cash
payments totaling $9.4 million and $7.3 million,
respectively, upon to settlement of the agreements during the
year.
Pension
Plans
We assumed the assets and obligations related to certain defined
benefit pension plans in connection with our acquisition of
Dictaphone, which provide certain retirement and death benefits
for former Dictaphone employees located in the United Kingdom
and Canada. These two pension plans are closed to new
participants. These plans
43
require periodic cash contributions. The Canadian plan is fully
funded and expected to remain fully funded during fiscal 2012,
without additional funding. In fiscal 2011, total cash funding
for the UK pension plan was $1.4 million. For the UK
pension plan, we have a minimum funding requirement of
£859,900 (approximately $1.3 million based on the
exchange rate at September 30, 2011) for each of the
next three years, through fiscal 2014.
In connection with our acquisition of SVOX A.G. in June 2011, we
assumed an additional defined benefit pension plan for employees
in Switzerland. At the end of September, 2011, the plan benefit
obligations exceed the plan assets by approximately
$1.9 million. The plan requires periodic cash
contributions, including participant contributions from active
employees. Company contributions in fiscal 2012 are expected to
be $0.5 million.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Through September 30, 2011, we have not entered into any
off-balance sheet arrangements or material transactions with
unconsolidated entities or other persons.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments, including
those related to revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful
accounts and returns; the valuation of goodwill, intangible
assets and tangible long-lived assets; accounting for business
combinations; accounting for stock-based compensation;
accounting for derivative instruments; accounting for income
taxes and related valuation allowances; and loss contingencies.
Our management bases its estimates on historical experience,
market participant fair value considerations and various other
factors that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies most
significantly affect the portrayal of our financial condition
and results of operations and require our most difficult and
subjective judgments.
Revenue Recognition. We derive revenue from
the following sources: (1) software license agreements,
including royalty and other usage-based arrangements,
(2) post-contract customer support, (3) fixed and
variable fee hosting arrangements and (4) professional
services. Our revenue recognition policies for these revenue
streams are discussed below.
The sale
and/or
license of software products and technology is deemed to have
occurred when a customer either has taken possession of the
related software or technology or has access to take immediate
possession of the software or technology. In select situations,
we sell or license intellectual property in conjunction with, or
in place of, embedding our intellectual property in software. We
recognize revenue from the sale or license of software products
and licensing of technology when (i) persuasive evidence of
an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred,
(iii) the fee is fixed or determinable and
(iv) collectibility is probable. Vendor-specific objective
evidence (VSOE) of fair value for software and
software-related services exists when a company can support what
the fair value of its software
and/or
software-related services is based on evidence of the prices
charged by the company when the same elements are sold
separately. VSOE of fair value is required, generally, in order
to separate the accounting for various elements in a software
and related services arrangement. We have, in general,
established VSOE of fair value of our post-contract customer
support (PCS), professional services, and training.
Revenue from royalties on sales of our software products by
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), where no
services are included, is recognized in the quarter earned so
long as we have been notified by the OEM that such royalties are
due, and provided that all other revenue recognition criteria
are met.
Software arrangements generally include PCS, which includes
telephone support and the right to receive unspecified
upgrades/enhancements on a
when-and-if-available
basis, typically for one to five years. Revenue from PCS is
recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the term that
the maintenance service is provided.
44
Non-software revenue, such as arrangements containing hosting
services where the customer does not take possession of the
software at the outset of the arrangement and has no contractual
right to do so, is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or
services have been rendered, (iii) the fees are fixed or
determinable and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
For revenue arrangements with multiple elements that are not
considered to be software or software-related, we allocate an
arrangements fees into separate units of accounting based
on fair value. We generally support fair value of our
deliverables based upon the prices we charge when we sell
similar elements separately.
Revenue from products offered on a subscription
and/or
hosted, on-demand basis is recognized in the period the services
are provided, based on a fixed minimum fee
and/or
variable fees based on the volume of activity. Variable
subscription and hosting revenue is recognized as we are
notified by the customer or through management reports that such
revenue is due, provided that all other revenue recognition
criteria are met.
Set-up fees
from arrangements containing hosting services, as well as the
associated direct and incremental costs, are deferred and
recognized ratably over the longer of the contractual lives, or
the expected lives of the customer relationships.
When we provide professional services considered essential to
the functionality of the software, we recognize revenue from the
professional services as well as any related software licenses
on a
percentage-of-completion
basis whereby the arrangement consideration is recognized as the
services are performed as measured by an observable input. In
these circumstances, we separate license revenue from
professional service revenue for income statement presentation
by allocating VSOE of fair value of the professional services as
professional service revenue and the residual portion as license
revenue. We generally determine the
percentage-of-completion
by comparing the labor hours incurred to-date to the estimated
total labor hours required to complete the project. We consider
labor hours to be the most reliable, available measure of
progress on these projects. Adjustments to estimates to complete
are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a change
become known. When the estimate indicates that a loss will be
incurred, such loss is recorded in the period identified.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the percent complete of each contract. Different assumptions
could yield materially different results.
When products are sold through distributors or resellers, title
and risk of loss generally passes upon shipment, at which time
the transaction is invoiced and payment is due. Shipments to
distributors and resellers without right of return are
recognized as revenue upon shipment, provided all other revenue
recognition criteria are met. Certain distributors and
value-added resellers have been granted rights of return for as
long as the distributors or resellers hold the inventory. We
cannot estimate historical returns from these distributors and
resellers; and therefore, cannot use such estimates as the basis
upon which to estimate future sales returns. As a result, we
recognize revenue from sales to these distributors and resellers
when the products are sold through to retailers and end-users.
When products are sold directly to retailers or end-users, we
make an estimate of sales returns based on historical
experience. The provision for these estimated returns is
recorded as a reduction of revenue and accounts receivable at
the time that the related revenue is recorded. If actual returns
differ significantly from our estimates, such differences could
have a material impact on our results of operations for the
period in which the actual returns become known.
When maintenance and support contracts renew automatically, we
provide a reserve based on historical experience for contracts
expected to be cancelled for non-payment. All known and
estimated cancellations are recorded as a reduction to revenue
and accounts receivable.
We record consideration given to a reseller as a reduction of
revenue to the extent we have recorded cumulative revenue from
the customer or reseller. However, when we receive an
identifiable benefit in exchange for the consideration, and can
reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received, the
consideration is recorded as an operating expense.
We record reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket
expenses as revenue, with offsetting costs recorded as cost of
revenue.
Out-of-pocket
expenses generally include, but are not limited to, expenses
related to transportation, lodging and meals.
45
We record shipping and handling costs billed to customers as
revenue with offsetting costs recorded as cost of revenue.
Our revenue recognition policies require management to make
significant estimates. Management analyzes various factors,
including a review of specific transactions, historical
experience, creditworthiness of customers and current market and
economic conditions. Changes in judgments based upon these
factors could impact the timing and amount of revenue and cost
recognized and thus affects our results of operations and
financial condition.
Business Combinations. We determine and
allocate the purchase price of an acquired company to the
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
as of the business combination date. The purchase price
allocation process requires us to use significant estimates and
assumptions, including fair value estimates, as of the business
acquisition date, including:
|
|
|
|
|
estimated fair values of intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of legal performance commitments to
customers, assumed from the acquiree under existing contractual
obligations (classified as deferred revenue) at the date of
acquisition;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of stock awards assumed from the
acquiree that are included in the purchase price;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market value of required payments under
contingent consideration provisions;
|
|
|
|
estimated income tax assets and liabilities assumed from the
acquiree; and
|
|
|
|
estimated fair value of pre-acquisition contingencies assumed
from the acquiree.
|
While we use our best estimates and assumptions as a part of the
purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the business combination
date, our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and
subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price
allocation period, which is generally one year from the business
combination date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to
goodwill. Subsequent to the purchase price allocation period any
adjustment to assets acquired or liabilities assumed is included
in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is
determined. For changes in the valuation of intangible assets
between preliminary and final purchase price allocation, the
related amortization is adjusted on a prospective basis.
Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made
in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based
in part on historical experience and information obtained from
the management of the acquired companies and are inherently
uncertain. Examples of critical estimates in valuing certain of
the intangible assets we have acquired or may acquire in the
future include but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
future expected cash flows from software license sales, support
agreements, consulting contracts, other customer contracts and
acquired developed technologies and patents;
|
|
|
|
expected costs to develop in-process research and development
projects into commercially viable products and the estimated
cash flows from the projects when completed;
|
|
|
|
the acquired companys brand and competitive position, as
well as assumptions about the period of time the acquired brand
will continue to be used in the combined companys product
portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
discount rates.
|
Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur which may
affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates
or actual results.
In connection with the purchase price allocations for our
acquisitions, we estimate the fair market value of legal
performance commitments to customers, which are classified as
deferred revenue. The estimated fair market value of these
obligations is determined and recorded as of the acquisition
date.
For a given acquisition, we may identify certain pre-acquisition
contingencies. If, during the purchase price allocation period,
we are able to determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition
contingency, we will include that
46
amount in the purchase price allocation. If we are unable to
determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition contingency at the
end of the purchase price allocation period, we will evaluate
whether to include an amount in the purchase price allocation
based on whether it is probable a liability had been incurred
and whether an amount can be reasonably estimated. After the end
of the purchase price allocation period, any adjustment to
amounts recorded for a pre-acquisition contingency will be
included in our operating results in the period in which the
adjustment is determined.
Goodwill, Intangible and Other Long-Lived Assets and
Impairment Assessments. We have significant
long-lived tangible and intangible assets, including goodwill
and intangible assets with indefinite lives, which are
susceptible to valuation adjustments as a result of changes in
various factors or conditions. The most significant finite-lived
tangible and intangible assets are customer relationships,
licensed technology, patents and core technology, completed
technology, fixed assets and trade names. All finite-lived
intangible assets are amortized based upon patterns in which the
economic benefits are expected to be utilized. The values of
intangible assets determined in connection with a business
combination, with the exception of goodwill, were initially
determined by a risk-adjusted, discounted cash flow approach. We
assess the potential impairment of intangible and fixed assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying values may not be recoverable. Goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed for potential
impairment at least annually, but also whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying values may not be
recoverable. Factors we consider important, which could trigger
an impairment of such assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained
period; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would materially
impact future results of operations and financial position in
the reporting period identified.
We test goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for
impairment annually in the fourth quarter, and between annual
tests if indicators of potential impairment exist. The
impairment test for goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives compares the fair value of identified reporting
unit(s) to its (their) carrying amount to assess whether such
assets are impaired. As a result of the change in our reportable
segments in fiscal 2011, we now have seven reporting units based
on the level of information provided to, and review thereof, by
our management.
We determine fair values for each of the reporting units using
an income approach. When available and appropriate, we also use
a comparative market approach to derive the fair values. For
purposes of the income approach, fair value is determined based
on the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted
at an appropriate risk adjusted rate. We use our internal
forecasts to estimate future cash flows and include an estimate
of long-term future growth rates based on our most recent views
of the long-term outlook for each business. Actual results may
differ from those assumed in our forecasts. We derive our
discount rates using a capital asset pricing model and analyzing
published rates for industries relevant to our reporting units
to estimate the cost of equity financing. We use discount rates
that are commensurate with the risks and uncertainty inherent in
the respective businesses and in our internally developed
forecasts. Discount rates used in our reporting unit valuations
ranged from 13% to 23%. For purposes of the market approach, we
use a valuation technique in which values are derived based on
market prices of comparable publicly traded companies. We also
use a market based valuation technique in which values are
determined based on relevant observable information generated by
market transactions involving comparable businesses. Compared to
the market approach, the income approach more closely aligns
each reporting unit valuation to our business profile, including
geographic markets served and product offerings. Required rates
of return, along with uncertainty inherent in the forecasts of
future cash flows, are reflected in the selection of the
discount rate. Equally important, under this approach,
reasonably likely scenarios and associated sensitivities can be
developed for alternative future states that may not be
reflected in an observable market price. A market approach
allows for comparison to actual market transactions and
multiples. It can be somewhat more limited in its
47
application because the population of potential comparables is
often limited to publicly-traded companies where the
characteristics of the comparative business and ours can be
significantly different, market data is usually not available
for divisions within larger conglomerates or non-public
subsidiaries that could otherwise qualify as comparable, and the
specific circumstances surrounding a market transaction (e.g.,
synergies between the parties, terms and conditions of the
transaction, etc.) may be different or irrelevant with respect
to our business. It can also be difficult, under certain market
conditions, to identify orderly transactions between market
participants in similar businesses. We assess each valuation
methodology based upon the relevance and availability of the
data at the time we perform the valuation and weight the
methodologies appropriately.
The carrying values of the reporting units were determined based
on an allocation of our assets and liabilities through specific
allocation of certain assets and liabilities, to the reporting
units and an apportionment method based on relative size of the
reporting units revenues and operating expenses compared
to the Company as a whole. Goodwill was allocated to the new
reporting units based on the relative fair value of the affected
units at the date we implemented the new structure. Certain
corporate assets that are not instrumental to the reporting
units operations and would not be transferred to
hypothetical purchasers of the reporting units were excluded
from the reporting units carrying values.
Based on our assessments, we have not had any impairment charges
during our history as a result of our impairment evaluation of
goodwill. Significant adverse changes in our future revenues
and/or
adjusted EBITDA results, or significant degradation in the
enterprise values of comparable companies within our segments,
could result in the determination that all or a portion of our
goodwill is impaired. However, as of our fiscal 2011 annual
impairment assessment date, our estimated fair values of our
reporting units significantly exceeded their carrying values.
We periodically review long-lived assets other than goodwill or
indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or
that the useful lives of those assets are no longer appropriate.
Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the
undiscounted cash flows to the recorded carrying value for the
asset or asset group. Asset groups utilized in this analysis are
identified as the lowest level grouping of assets for which
largely independent cash flows can be identified. If impairment
is indicated, the asset or asset group is written down to its
estimated fair value.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the useful lives of our long-lived assets, determining the
reporting units and assessing when events or circumstances would
require an interim impairment analysis of goodwill or other
long-lived assets to be performed. Changes in our organization
or management reporting structure, as well as other events and
circumstances, including but not limited to technological
advances, increased competition and changing economic or market
conditions, could result in (a) shorter estimated useful
lives, (b) changes to reporting units, which may require
alternative methods of estimating fair values or greater
disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by reporting unit,
and/or
(c) other changes in previous assumptions or estimates. In
turn, this could have a significant impact on our consolidated
financial statements through accelerated amortization
and/or
impairment charges.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. We
account for share-based awards to employees and directors,
including grants of employee stock options, purchases under
employee stock purchase plans, awards in the form of restricted
shares (Restricted Stock) and awards in the form of
units of stock purchase rights (Restricted Units)
through recognition of the fair value of the share-based awards
as a charge against earnings in the form of stock-based
compensation expense. We recognize stock-based compensation
expense over the requisite service period, net of estimated
forfeitures. We will recognize a benefit from stock-based
compensation in equity using the
with-and-without
approach for the utilization of tax attributes. The Restricted
Stock and Restricted Units are collectively referred to as
Restricted Awards. Determining the fair value of
share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment,
including estimating expected dividends, share price volatility
and the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be
forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these
estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of
operations could be materially impacted.
Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the
differences
48
are expected to reverse. We do not provide for U.S. income
taxes on the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries,
which we consider to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the
U.S.
We make judgments regarding the realizability of our deferred
tax assets. The balance sheet carrying value of our net deferred
tax assets is based on whether we believe that it is more likely
than not that we will generate sufficient future taxable income
to realize these deferred tax assets after consideration of all
available evidence. We regularly review our deferred tax assets
for recoverability considering historical profitability,
projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the
reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning
strategies.
Valuation allowances have been established for U.S. and
certain foreign deferred tax assets, which we believe do not
meet the more likely than not criteria for
recognition. If we are subsequently able to utilize all or a
portion of the deferred tax assets for which a valuation
allowance has been established, then we may be required to
recognize these deferred tax assets through the reduction of the
valuation allowance which could result in a material benefit to
our results of operations in the period in which the benefit is
determined, excluding the recognition of the portion of the
valuation allowance which relates to net deferred tax assets
created as a result of stock-based compensation or other equity
transactions where prevailing guidance requires the change in
valuation allowance to be traced forward. The recognition of the
portion of the valuation allowance which relates to net deferred
tax assets resulting from stock-based compensation or other
qualifying equity transactions will be recorded as additional
paid-in-capital.
We establish reserves for tax uncertainties that reflect the use
of the comprehensive model for the recognition and measurement
of uncertain tax positions. Under the comprehensive model, when
the minimum threshold for recognition is not met, no tax benefit
can be recorded. When the minimum threshold for recognition is
met, a tax position is recorded as the largest amount that is
more than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement.
Loss Contingencies. We are subject to legal
proceedings, lawsuits and other claims relating to labor,
service and other matters arising in the ordinary course of
business, as discussed in Note 18 of Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements. Quarterly, we review the
status of each significant matter and assess our potential
financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or
legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be
reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated
loss. Significant judgment is required in both the determination
of probability and the determination as to whether an exposure
is reasonably estimable. Because of uncertainties related to
these matters, accruals are based only on the best information
available at the time. As additional information becomes
available, we reassess the potential liability related to our
pending claims and litigation and may revise our estimates. Such
revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could
have a material impact on our results of operations and
financial position.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-05,
Comprehensive Income. This ASU intends to enhance
comparability and transparency of other comprehensive income
components. The guidance provides an option to present total
comprehensive income, the components of net income and the
components of other comprehensive income in a single continuous
statement or two separate but consecutive statements. This ASU
eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income
components as part of the statement of changes in
shareowners equity. The provisions of this ASU will be
applied retrospectively for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2011. Early application is permitted.
ASU 2011-05
impacts disclosure only and therefore, is not expected to, have
a material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-04,
Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and
Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International
Financial Reporting Standards, to provide consistent
definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value
measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between
U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards.
ASU 2011-04
changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances
the disclosure requirements, particularly for level 3 fair
value measurements (as defined in Note 12 of Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements). ASU
2011-04 is
effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We
are currently evaluating the impact on our fair value measures.
49
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-29,
Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for
Business Combinations, to provide guidelines for how pro
forma disclosures are calculated. In addition, ASU
2010-29
expands the disclosure requirements and requires a description
of the nature and amount of any material, nonrecurring pro forma
adjustments directly attributable to a business combination and
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010. ASU
2010-29
impacts disclosure only and therefore, did not, and is not
expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-28,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When
to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting
Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. ASU
2010-28 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010 and amends the criteria for performing Step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or
negative carrying amounts and requires performing Step 2 if
qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not
that a goodwill impairment exists. We do not believe that this
will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (Topic
820) Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASU
2010-06),
which requires additional disclosures about the different
classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, the
valuation techniques and inputs used, the activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements, and transfers between
Levels 1, 2, and 3. Levels 1, 2 and 3 of fair value
measurements are defined in Note 12 of Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements. ASU
2010-06 was
effective for us for the interim reporting period beginning
January 1, 2010, except for the provisions related to
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
provisions are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those
fiscal years. ASU
2010-06
impacts disclosure only and therefore, did not, and is not
expected to, have a material impact on our financial statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices which could
affect operating results, financial position and cash flows. We
manage our exposure to these market risks through our regular
operating and financing activities and, when appropriate,
through the use of derivative financial instruments.
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Any foreign currency transaction, defined as a transaction
denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, will
be reported in U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange
rate. Assets and liabilities are translated into
U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date and income and expense items are translated at
average rates for the period. The primary foreign currency
denominated transactions include revenue and expenses and the
resulting accounts receivable and accounts payable balances
reflected on our balance sheet. Therefore, the change in the
value of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies
will have either a positive or negative effect on our financial
position and results of operations. Historically, our primary
exposure has related to transactions denominated in the euro,
British pound, Canadian dollar, Japanese yen, Indian rupee and
Hungarian forint.
A hypothetical change of 10% in appreciation or depreciation in
foreign currency exchange rates from the quoted foreign currency
exchange rates at September 30, 2011 would not have a
material impact on our revenue, operating results or cash flows
in the coming year.
Periodically, we enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge
against foreign currency fluctuations. These contracts may or
may not be designated as cash flow hedges for accounting
purposes. At September 30, 2011, we have foreign currency
contracts with a total notional value of approximately
$0.5 million designated as cash flow hedges. These
contracts all mature in October 2011. The notional contract
amount of outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts not
designated as cash flow hedges was $75.7 million at
September 30, 2011. During fiscal 2011 and 2010, we
recorded foreign exchange loss of ($1.1) million and a gain
of $3.5 million, respectively. Based on the nature of the
transaction for which the contracts were purchased, a
hypothetical change of 10% in exchange rates would not have a
material impact on our financial results.
50
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our
significant cash and cash equivalents, and the outstanding debt
under the Credit Facility.
At September 30, 2011, we held approximately
$447.2 million of cash and cash equivalents primarily
consisting of cash and money-market funds. Due to the low
current market yields and the short-term nature of our
investments, a hypothetical change in market rates of one
percentage point would not have a material effect on the fair
value of our portfolio or results of operations.
At September 30, 2011, our total outstanding debt balance
exposed to variable interest rates was $636.9 million. A
hypothetical change in market rates would have a significant
impact on interest expense and amounts payable. Assuming a one
percentage point increase in interest rates, our interest
expense relative to our outstanding variable rate debt would
increase $6.4 million per annum.
Equity
Price Risk
We are exposed to equity price risk as a result of security
price guarantees that we enter in to from time to time.
Generally, these price guarantees are for a period of six months
or less, and require payment from either us to a third party, or
from the third party to us, based upon changes in our stock
price during the contract term. As of September 30, 2011,
we have security price guarantees outstanding for approximately
1.3 million shares of our common stock. A 10% change in our
stock price during the next six months would not have a material
impact on our statements of operations or cash flows.
Convertible
Debentures
The fair value of our 2.75% convertible debentures due in 2027
is dependent on the price and volatility of our common stock as
well as movements in interest rates. The fair market value of
the debentures will generally increase or decrease as the market
price of our common stock changes. The fair market value of the
debentures will generally increase as interest rates fall and
decrease as interest rates rise. The market value and interest
rate changes affect the fair market value of the debentures, but
do not impact our financial position, cash flows or results of
operations due to the fixed nature of the debt obligations.
However, increases in the value of our common stock above $23.36
for a specified period of time may provide the holders of the
debentures the right to convert each bond using a conversion
ratio and payment method as defined in the debenture agreement.
Our debentures trade in the financial markets, and the fair
value at September 30, 2011 was $313.4 million, based on an
average of the bid and ask prices for that day. This compares to
a conversion value on September 30, 2011 of approximately
$261.2 million. A 10% increase in the stock price over the
September 30, 2011 closing price of $20.34 would have an
estimated $19.7 million increase to the fair value and a $26.1
million increase to the conversion value of the debentures.
Given the current trading value of the debentures, the greatest
value to the holders of the debentures would be to sell their
holding in the open market in order to maximize their return.
Based on this, we believe that the holders may not have a
significant economic incentive to convert prior to the first
redemption date in August 2014.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Nuance
Communications, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements
51
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
52
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Nuance Communications, Inc. as of September 30, 2011 and
2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2011. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Nuance Communications, Inc. at September 30,
2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2011, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Nuance Communications, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations (COSO), and our report dated November 29,
2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
BDO USA, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 29, 2011
53
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts
We have audited Nuance Communication Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Nuance Communications, Inc.s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Item 9A, Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Nuance Communications, Inc. maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Nuance Communications, Inc. as of
September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended September 30, 2011 and our
report dated November 29, 2011 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
BDO USA, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 29, 2011
54
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
$
|
607,358
|
|
|
$
|
473,460
|
|
|
$
|
373,367
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
509,141
|
|
|
|
463,567
|
|
|
|
411,363
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
202,242
|
|
|
|
181,921
|
|
|
|
165,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,318,741
|
|
|
|
1,118,948
|
|
|
|
950,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
65,601
|
|
|
|
49,618
|
|
|
|
37,255
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
341,055
|
|
|
|
280,725
|
|
|
|
254,777
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
38,057
|
|
|
|
31,269
|
|
|
|
29,129
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
55,111
|
|
|
|
47,758
|
|
|
|
38,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
499,824
|
|
|
|
409,370
|
|
|
|
359,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
818,917
|
|
|
|
709,578
|
|
|
|
590,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
179,377
|
|
|
|
152,071
|
|
|
|
116,774
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
306,439
|
|
|
|
266,208
|
|
|
|
217,773
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
147,603
|
|
|
|
122,061
|
|
|
|
100,478
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
88,219
|
|
|
|
87,819
|
|
|
|
76,978
|
|
Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
21,866
|
|
|
|
30,611
|
|
|
|
15,703
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
22,862
|
|
|
|
17,891
|
|
|
|
5,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
766,366
|
|
|
|
676,661
|
|
|
|
533,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
52,551
|
|
|
|
32,917
|
|
|
|
57,575
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,159
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(36,703
|
)
|
|
|
(40,993
|
)
|
|
|
(47,288
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
11,010
|
|
|
|
5,773
|
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
30,017
|
|
|
|
(1,065
|
)
|
|
|
21,004
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(8,221
|
)
|
|
|
18,034
|
|
|
|
40,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
38,238
|
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
302,277
|
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
315,960
|
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
55
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
447,224
|
|
|
$
|
516,630
|
|
Restricted cash (Note 9)
|
|
|
6,799
|
|
|
|
24,503
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
31,244
|
|
|
|
5,044
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of
$5,707 and $6,301
|
|
|
280,186
|
|
|
|
217,587
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
88,804
|
|
|
|
70,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
854,927
|
|
|
|
841,642
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
78,218
|
|
|
|
62,083
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,322
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,347,880
|
|
|
|
2,077,943
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
731,577
|
|
|
|
685,865
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
82,691
|
|
|
|
73,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,095,293
|
|
|
$
|
3,769,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
$
|
6,905
|
|
|
$
|
7,764
|
|
Contingent and deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
23,783
|
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
82,703
|
|
|
|
78,616
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
176,074
|
|
|
|
151,621
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
185,605
|
|
|
|
142,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
475,070
|
|
|
|
382,472
|
|
Long-term portion of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
853,020
|
|
|
|
851,014
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
90,382
|
|
|
|
76,598
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
72,229
|
|
|
|
63,731
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
111,221
|
|
|
|
98,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,601,922
|
|
|
|
1,472,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3, 5, and 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock, $0.001 par value;
15,000 shares authorized; 3,562 shares issued and
outstanding (liquidation preference $4,631)
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 560,000 shares
authorized; 312,456 and 301,623 shares issued and 308,705
and 297,950 shares outstanding
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,745,931
|
|
|
|
2,581,901
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (3,751 and 3,673 shares)
|
|
|
(16,788
|
)
|
|
|
(16,788
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(243,117
|
)
|
|
|
(281,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,493,371
|
|
|
|
2,297,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,095,293
|
|
|
$
|
3,769,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
56
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2008
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
232,592
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
1,712,993
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
(16,070
|
)
|
|
|
12,739
|
|
|
|
(242,869
|
)
|
|
|
1,471,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock-based compensation
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,722
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
19,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,945
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted stock, and repurchase of common stock
at cost for employee tax withholding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10,401
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with financing, net of
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,396
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
175,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with warrant exercises,
net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
20,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with business and asset
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,196
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
268,669
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to escrow agent in connection with
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested options for the purchase of common stock, assumed in
connection with acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for escrow, make-whole and earn-out settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on pensions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
280,647
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
2,308,992
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
(16,214
|
)
|
|
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
(262,256
|
)
|
|
|
2,043,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock-based compensation
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,402
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
29,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,737
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted stock, and repurchase of common stock
at cost for employee tax withholding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,635
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(25,973
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with warrant exercises,
net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with business and asset
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,845
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
106,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with collaboration
agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
39,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for escrow, make-whole and earn-out settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on pensions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
301,623
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
2,581,901
|
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
(16,788
|
)
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
(281,355
|
)
|
|
|
2,297,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock-based compensation
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,762
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
36,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted stock, and repurchase of common stock
at cost for employee tax withholding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,996
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(36,705
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,707
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with business and asset
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with collaboration
agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
23,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for escrow, make-whole and earn-out settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,238
|
|
|
|
38,238
|
|
|
$
|
38,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,746
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,746
|
)
|
|
|
(8,746
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on pensions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
$
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
312,456
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
2,745,931
|
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
$
|
(16,788
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,402
|
|
|
$
|
(243,117
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,493,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
57
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
38,238
|
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,387
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
170,933
|
|
|
|
157,156
|
|
|
|
134,059
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
147,296
|
|
|
|
100,139
|
|
|
|
71,407
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
12,510
|
|
|
|
12,955
|
|
|
|
12,492
|
|
Non-cash restructuring expense
|
|
|
11,725
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(43,890
|
)
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
Other
|
|
|
16,492
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
(6,083
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(25,530
|
)
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
|
|
33,481
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(11,793
|
)
|
|
|
(3,840
|
)
|
|
|
(14,027
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(8,193
|
)
|
|
|
4,710
|
|
|
|
26,582
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(6,775
|
)
|
|
|
(6,760
|
)
|
|
|
(5,007
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
56,398
|
|
|
|
39,643
|
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
357,411
|
|
|
|
296,282
|
|
|
|
258,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(34,907
|
)
|
|
|
(25,974
|
)
|
|
|
(19,512
|
)
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(402,290
|
)
|
|
|
(203,729
|
)
|
|
|
(99,120
|
)
|
Payment for equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,970
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(10,776
|
)
|
|
|
(33,529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
11,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Payments for acquired technology
|
|
|
(6,715
|
)
|
|
|
(15,300
|
)
|
|
|
(65,875
|
)
|
Change in restricted cash balances
|
|
|
17,184
|
|
|
|
(22,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(425,854
|
)
|
|
|
(315,572
|
)
|
|
|
(184,610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
(7,535
|
)
|
|
|
(8,460
|
)
|
|
|
(6,999
|
)
|
Payments of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(2,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
|
|
195,571
|
|
Payments on other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(10,643
|
)
|
|
|
(9,870
|
)
|
|
|
(9,180
|
)
|
Proceeds from settlement of share-based derivatives, net
|
|
|
9,414
|
|
|
|
7,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits on employee equity awards
|
|
|
17,520
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from employee stock plans
|
|
|
36,667
|
|
|
|
29,510
|
|
|
|
19,837
|
|
Cash used to net share settle employee equity awards
|
|
|
(36,908
|
)
|
|
|
(22,016
|
)
|
|
|
(10,546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
5,962
|
|
|
|
9,880
|
|
|
|
189,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(6,925
|
)
|
|
|
(998
|
)
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(69,406
|
)
|
|
|
(10,408
|
)
|
|
|
265,498
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
516,630
|
|
|
|
527,038
|
|
|
|
261,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
447,224
|
|
|
$
|
516,630
|
|
|
$
|
527,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
58
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Presentation
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. (we, Nuance,
or the Company) is a leading provider of voice and
language solutions for businesses and consumers around the
world. Our technologies, applications and services make the user
experience more compelling by transforming the way people
interact with devices and systems. Our solutions are used for
tasks and services such as requesting information from a
phone-based self-service solution, dictating medical records,
searching the mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a
navigation system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions
help make these interactions, tasks and experiences more
productive, compelling and efficient.
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our extensive network of partners to design and deploy
innovative solutions for businesses and organizations around the
globe. We market and sell our products directly through a
dedicated sales force, our
e-commerce
website and a global network of resellers, including system
integrators, independent software vendors, value-added
resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications carriers and
distributors.
We have built a portfolio of intellectual property,
technologies, applications and solutions through both internal
development and acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue
opportunities to expand our assets, geographic presence,
distribution network and customer base through acquisitions of
other businesses and technologies. Significant business
acquisitions during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
June 16, 2011 SVOX A.G. (SVOX)
|
|
|
|
June 15, 2011 Equitrac Corporation
(Equitrac)
|
|
|
|
December 30, 2009 SpinVox, Limited
(SpinVox)
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2008 SNAPin, Inc.
(SNAPin)
|
The results of operations from the acquired businesses have been
included in our consolidated financial statements from their
respective acquisition dates. See Note 3 for additional
disclosure related to each of these acquisitions.
As discussed in Note 22, we changed our segment reporting
structure in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 to four
reportable segments; Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer,
Enterprise, and Imaging. Prior periods in these consolidated
financial statements have been recast to reflect the new segment
reporting structure.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments. The most
important of these relate to revenue recognition; the allowances
for doubtful accounts and sales returns; the valuation of
goodwill and intangible assets; accounting for business
combinations; accounting for stock-based compensation;
accounting for long-term facility obligations; the accounting
for derivative instruments; accounting for income taxes and
related valuation allowances; and loss contingencies. We base
our estimates on historical experience, market participant fair
value considerations and various other factors that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual amounts could
differ significantly from these estimates.
59
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Basis
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and
those of our wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries.
Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Reclassification
We reclassified certain items included within the statements of
cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
to conform with the current year presentation. The
reclassifications include combining depreciation and
amortization expense and combining the gain on foreign currency
forward contracts with other to conform with current year
presentation. Such reclassifications have no impact on earnings
or cash flows provided by operations.
Revenue
Recognition
We derive revenue from the following sources: (1) software
license agreements, including royalty and other usage-based
arrangements, (2) post-contract customer support,
(3) fixed and variable fee hosting arrangements and
(4) professional services. Our revenue recognition policies
for these revenue streams are discussed below.
The sale
and/or
license of software products and technology is deemed to have
occurred when a customer either has taken possession of the
related software or technology or has access to take immediate
possession of the software or technology. In select situations,
we sell or license intellectual property in conjunction with, or
in place of, embedding our intellectual property in software. We
recognize revenue from the sale or license of software products
and licensing of technology when (i) persuasive evidence of
an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred,
(iii) the fee is fixed or determinable and
(iv) collectibility is probable. Vendor-specific objective
evidence (VSOE) of fair value for software and
software-related services exists when a company can support what
the fair value of its software
and/or
software-related services is based on evidence of the prices
charged when the same elements are sold separately. VSOE of fair
value is required, generally, in order to separate the
accounting for various elements in a software and related
services arrangement. We have established VSOE of fair value for
the majority of our post-contract customer support
(PCS), professional services, and training.
Revenue from royalties on sales of our software products by
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), where no
services are included, is recognized in the quarter earned so
long as we have been notified by the OEM that such royalties are
due, and provided that all other revenue recognition criteria
are met.
Software arrangements generally include PCS, which includes
telephone support and the right to receive unspecified
upgrades/enhancements on a
when-and-if-available
basis, typically for one to five years. Revenue from PCS is
generally recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the
term that the maintenance service is provided.
Non-software revenue, such as arrangements containing hosting
services where the customer does not take possession of the
software at the outset of the arrangement and has no contractual
right to do so, is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or
services have been rendered, (iii) the fees are fixed or
determinable and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
Effective October 1, 2010, we adopted the provisions in the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2009-13,
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements (ASU
2009-13)
and ASU
2009-14,
Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements that
Include Software Elements (ASU
2009-14).
The provisions of ASU
2009-13
apply to arrangements that are outside the scope of software
revenue recognition guidance and amend Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 605 to (1) provide
updated guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the
deliverables in an arrangement should be separated, and the
consideration allocated; (2) require an entity to allocate
revenue in an arrangement using the best estimated selling
prices (BESP) of deliverables if a vendor does not
have vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) or
third-party evidence (TPE) of selling price; and
(3) eliminate the use of the residual method and require an
entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price
60
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
method. ASU
2009-14
modifies the scope of ASC Topic 985 to remove industry specific
revenue accounting guidance for software and software related
transactions, tangible products containing software components
and non-software components that function together to deliver
the products essential functionality. The adoption of
these provisions did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2009-13
does not generally change the units of accounting for our
revenue transactions. For multiple-element arrangements that
contain both software and non-software elements such as our
hosted offerings, we allocate revenue to software or software
related elements and any non-software elements separately based
on the selling price hierarchy. We determine the selling price
for each deliverable using VSOE of selling price, if it exists,
or TPE of selling price. If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling
price exist for a deliverable, we use our BESP for that
deliverable. Revenue allocated to each element is then
recognized when the basic revenue recognition criteria are met
for each element.
To determine the selling price in multiple-element arrangements,
we establish VSOE of fair value for the majority of our
post-contract customer support, professional services, and
training based on historical stand-alone sales to third-parties.
Typically, we are unable to determine TPE of selling price and
therefore when neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exist, we
use BESP for the purposes of allocating the arrangement
consideration. We determine BESP for a product or service by
considering multiple factors including, but not limited to,
major product groupings, market conditions, competitive
landscape, price list and discounting practice.
Revenue from products offered on a subscription
and/or
hosted, on-demand basis is recognized in the period the services
are provided, based on a fixed minimum fee
and/or
variable fees based on the volume of activity. Variable
subscription and hosting revenue is recognized as we are
notified by the customer or through management reports that such
revenue is due, provided that all other revenue recognition
criteria are met.
Set-up fees
from arrangements containing hosting services, as well as the
associated direct and incremental costs, are deferred and
recognized ratably over the longer of the contract lives, or the
expected lives of the customer relationships.
When we provide professional services considered essential to
the functionality of the software, we recognize revenue from the
professional services as well as any related software licenses
on a
percentage-of-completion
basis whereby the arrangement consideration is recognized as the
services are performed, as measured by an observable input. In
these circumstances, we separate license revenue from
professional service revenue for income statement presentation
by allocating VSOE of fair value of the professional services as
professional service revenue and the residual portion as license
revenue. We generally determine the
percentage-of-completion
by comparing the labor hours incurred to-date to the estimated
total labor hours required to complete the project. We consider
labor hours to be the most reliable, available measure of
progress on these projects. Adjustments to estimates to complete
are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a change
become known. When the estimate indicates that a loss will be
incurred, such loss is recorded in the period identified.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the percent complete of each contract. Different assumptions
could yield materially different results.
When products are sold through distributors or resellers, title
and risk of loss generally passes upon shipment, at which time
the transaction is invoiced and payment is due. Shipments to
distributors and resellers without right of return are
recognized as revenue upon shipment, provided all other revenue
recognition criteria are met. Certain distributors and
value-added resellers have been granted rights of return for as
long as the distributors or resellers hold the inventory. We
cannot use historical returns from these distributors and
resellers as a basis upon which to estimate future sales
returns. As a result, we recognize revenue from sales to these
distributors and resellers when the products are sold through to
retailers and end-users.
When products are sold directly to retailers or end-users, we
make an estimate of sales returns based on historical
experience. The provision for these estimated returns is
recorded as a reduction of revenue and accounts receivable at
the time that the related revenue is recorded. If actual returns
differ significantly from our estimates,
61
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
such differences could have a material impact on our results of
operations for the period in which the actual returns become
known.
When maintenance and support contracts renew automatically, we
provide a reserve based on historical experience for contracts
expected to be cancelled for non-payment. All known and
estimated cancellations are recorded as a reduction to revenue
and accounts receivable.
We record consideration given to a reseller as a reduction of
revenue to the extent we have recorded cumulative revenue from
the customer or reseller. However, when we receive an
identifiable benefit in exchange for the consideration, and can
reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received, the
consideration is recorded as an operating expense.
We record reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket
expenses as revenue, with offsetting costs recorded as cost of
revenue.
Out-of-pocket
expenses generally include, but are not limited to, expenses
related to transportation, lodging and meals.
We record shipping and handling costs billed to customers as
revenue with offsetting costs recorded as cost of revenue.
Deferred revenue at September 30, 2011 and 2010 were as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
$
|
101,480
|
|
|
$
|
90,969
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
84,125
|
|
|
|
51,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
185,605
|
|
|
$
|
142,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
$
|
22,712
|
|
|
$
|
12,902
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
67,670
|
|
|
|
63,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
90,382
|
|
|
$
|
76,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the deferred maintenance revenue is primarily
related to an increase in Imaging maintenance and support as
well as an increase in Enterprise application maintenance.
Unearned revenue increased as a result of
set-up fees
on new hosting arrangements as well as billings in excess of
revenues earned on several large professional service
implementation projects.
Business
Combinations
We determine and allocate the purchase price of an acquired
company to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of the business combination date. Results
of operations and cash flows of acquired companies are included
in our operating results from the date of acquisition. The
purchase price allocation process requires us to use significant
estimates and assumptions, including fair value estimates, as of
the business combination date including:
|
|
|
|
|
estimated fair values of intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of legal performance commitments to
customers, assumed from the acquiree under existing contractual
obligations (classified as deferred revenue) at the date of
acquisition;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of stock awards assumed from the
acquiree that are included in the purchase price;
|
62
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market value of required payments under
contingent consideration provisions;
|
|
|
|
estimated income tax assets and liabilities assumed from the
acquiree; and
|
|
|
|
estimated fair value of pre-acquisition contingencies assumed
from the acquiree.
|
While we use our best estimates and assumptions as a part of the
purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the business combination
date, our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and
subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price
allocation period, which is generally one year from the business
combination date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to
goodwill. Subsequent to the purchase price allocation period any
adjustment to assets acquired or liabilities assumed is included
in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is
determined.
Goodwill
and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a
business combination over the fair value of net tangible and
intangible assets acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are not amortized, but rather the carrying
amounts of these assets are reviewed for impairment at least
annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable.
Our annual impairment assessment date is July 1 of each fiscal
year. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment based on a comparison
of the fair value of our reporting units to their recorded
carrying values. In fiscal 2011, we changed our reportable
segments, and as a result the underlying reporting units changed
as well. We now have seven reporting units based on the level of
information provided to, and review thereof, by our segment
management. Goodwill was reallocated to the new reporting units
based on the relative fair values of the reporting units at the
date we implemented the change.
We determine fair values for each of the reporting units using
an income approach. When available and appropriate, we also use
a comparative market approach to derive the fair values. For
purposes of the income approach, fair value is determined based
on the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted
at an appropriate risk adjusted rate. We use our internal
forecasts to estimate future cash flows and include an estimate
of long-term future growth rates based on our most recent views
of the long-term outlook for each business. Actual results may
differ from those assumed in our forecasts. We derive our
discount rates using a capital asset pricing model and analyzing
published rates for industries relevant to our reporting units
to estimate the cost of equity financing. We use discount rates
that are commensurate with the risks and uncertainty inherent in
the respective businesses and in our internally developed
forecasts. Discount rates used in our reporting unit valuations
ranged from 13% to 23%. For purposes of the market approach, we
use a valuation technique in which values are derived based on
market prices of comparable publically traded companies. We also
use a market based valuation technique in which values are
determined based on relevant observable information generated by
market transactions involving comparable businesses. We assess
each valuation methodology based upon the relevance and
availability of the data at the time we perform the valuation
and weight the methodologies appropriately. The carrying values
of the reporting units were determined based on an allocation of
our assets and liabilities through specific allocation of
certain assets and liabilities to the reporting units and an
apportionment method based on relative size of the reporting
units revenues and operating expenses compared to the
Company as a whole. Certain corporate assets that are not
instrumental to the reporting units operations and would
not be transferred to hypothetical purchasers of the reporting
units were excluded from the reporting units carrying
values. Indefinite-lived intangibles are evaluated for
impairment through comparison of the fair value of the assets to
their net book value.
Long-Lived
Assets
Our long-lived assets consist principally of acquired intangible
assets and land, building and equipment. Land, building and
equipment are stated at cost. Building and equipment are
depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
63
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the
related lease term or the estimated useful life. Costs of
significant improvements on existing software for internal use
are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. Repair
and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. The cost and
related accumulated depreciation of sold or retired assets are
removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in
operations.
We include in our amortizable intangible assets those intangible
assets acquired in our business and asset acquisitions,
including certain technology that is licensed from third
parties. We amortize acquired intangible assets with finite
lives over the estimated economic lives of the assets, generally
using the straight-line method except where the pattern of the
expected economic benefit is readily identifiable, primarily
customer relationship intangibles, whereby amortization follows
that pattern. Each period, we evaluate the estimated remaining
useful life of acquired and licensed intangible assets, as well
as land, buildings and equipment, to determine whether events or
changes in circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining
period of depreciation or amortization.
We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset
or asset group may not be recoverable. We assess the
recoverability of the assets based on the undiscounted future
cash flows the assets are expected to generate and recognize an
impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flows
expected to result from the use of the assets plus net proceeds
expected from disposition of the assets, if any, are less than
the carrying value of the assets. If an asset or asset group is
deemed to be impaired, the amount of the impairment loss, if
any, represents the excess of the asset or asset groups
carrying value compared to its estimated fair value.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consists of cash on hand, including
money market funds and time deposits with original maturities of
90 days or less.
Marketable
Securities and Minority Investments
Marketable Securities: Investments are
classified as
available-for-sale
and are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with
unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. Marketable
securities consist primarily of high-quality corporate debt
instruments and have maturity dates ranging from February 2012
through June 2012. As of September 30, 2011, the total cost
basis was $31.3 million.
Minority Investment: We record investments in
other companies where we do not have a controlling interest or
significant influence in the equity investment at cost within
other assets in our consolidated balance sheet. We review our
investments for impairment whenever declines in estimated fair
value are deemed to be
other-than-temporary.
Accounts
Receivable Allowances
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts: We maintain
an allowance for doubtful accounts for the estimated probable
losses on uncollectible accounts receivable. The allowance is
based upon the credit worthiness of our customers, our
historical experience, the age of the receivable and current
market and economic conditions. Receivables are written off
against these allowances in the period they are determined to be
uncollectible.
Allowances for Sales Returns: We maintain an
allowance for sales returns from customers for which we have the
ability to estimate returns based on historical experience. The
returns allowance is recorded as a reduction in revenue and
accounts receivable at the time the related revenue is recorded.
Receivables are written off against the allowance in the period
the return is received.
64
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the
activity related to accounts receivable allowances was as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
|
Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
Sales Returns
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2008
|
|
|
6,925
|
|
|
|
6,363
|
|
Bad debt provision
|
|
|
1,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(1,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue adjustments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
6,106
|
|
Bad debt provisions
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(1,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue adjustments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
6,301
|
|
|
|
6,829
|
|
Bad debt provisions
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(1,926
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue adjustments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
5,707
|
|
|
$
|
6,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, computed using the
first-in,
first-out method, or market value and are included in other
current assets. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand
and record a provision for excess
and/or
obsolete inventory primarily based on future purchase
commitments with our suppliers, and the estimated utility of our
inventory as well as other factors including technological
changes and new product development.
Inventories, net of allowances, consisted of the following
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Components and parts
|
|
$
|
6,279
|
|
|
$
|
5,357
|
|
Inventory at customers
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
4,797
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,351
|
|
|
$
|
8,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory at customers reflects equipment related to in-process
installations of solutions with customers. These contracts have
not been recorded as revenue as of the balance sheet date, and
therefore the related equipment is recorded in inventory until
installation is complete.
Research
and Development Costs
Internal costs relating to research and development incurred for
new software products and enhancements to existing products are
expensed as incurred.
65
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounting
for Collaboration Agreements
Healthcare
Collaboration Agreement
In June 2011, we entered into an agreement with a large
healthcare provider to acquire certain data to be used in a
joint development project in exchange for $10 million. In
addition, under the terms of the arrangement we will be
reimbursed for certain research and development costs related to
specified product development projects with the objective of
commercializing the resulting products. All intellectual
property derived from these research and development efforts
will be owned by us. Upon product introduction, we will pay
royalties to this party based on the actual sales. At the end of
five years, the party can elect to continue with the
arrangement, receiving royalties on future sales, or receive a
buy-out payment from us and forego future royalties. The buy-out
payment is calculated based on a number of factors including the
net cash flows received and paid by the parties, as well as a
minimum return on those net cash flows.
As of the execution of the above arrangement, we have other
arrangements where we have sold and will continue to sell our
products and services to this party. As a result, under the
guidance of ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, we are
required to reduce the revenue recognized by the amount we pay
to this customer, up to our historical revenue recorded from
them. We have therefore reduced reported revenue by
$10.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2011.
The above development arrangement will be accounted for in
accordance with ASC 730, Research and Development.
Accordingly, any buy-out obligation will be recorded as a
liability and any reimbursement of the research and development
costs in excess of the buy-out obligation will be recorded as an
offset to research and development costs. Royalties paid to this
party upon commercialization of any products from these
development efforts will be recorded as a reduction to revenue
in accordance with ASC 605. For fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011, $5.9 million of expense
reimbursement has been recorded as a reduction in research and
development expense.
Intellectual
Property Collaboration Agreements
In order to gain access to a third partys extensive speech
recognition technology, natural language and semantic process
technology, in fiscal 2010 and 2011 we entered into three
intellectual property collaboration agreements with terms up to
six years. Generally, the agreements call for annual payments in
cash or shares of our common stock, at our election. Payments
are estimated to be $23.4 million, $23.4 million and
$5 million in each of the next three years. Depending
on the agreement, some or all intellectual property derived from
these collaborations will be jointly owned by the two parties.
For the majority of the developed intellectual property, we will
have sole rights to commercialize such intellectual property for
periods ranging between two to six years, depending on the
agreement. The following is a summary of the payments made
during fiscal 2010 and 2011 under these three agreements
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Total Value
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
Shares Issued
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
October 14, 2009
|
|
|
1,047,120
|
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
145,897
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
June 24, 2010
|
|
|
152,440
|
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
September 28, 2010
|
|
|
1,178,732
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
April 1, 2011
|
|
|
127,878
|
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
June 25, 2011
|
|
|
123,275
|
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
August 18, 2011
|
|
|
1,023,360
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
The payments are recorded as a prepaid asset when made, and will
be expensed ratably over the contractual period. For the years
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we have recognized
$19.8 million and $16.7 million as
66
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
research and development expense, respectively, related to these
agreements in our consolidated statements of operations.
Software
Development Costs
Software development costs related to software that is or will
be sold or licensed externally to third-parties, or for which a
substantive plan exists to sell or license such software in the
future, incurred subsequent to the establishment of
technological feasibility, but prior to the general release of
the product, are capitalized and amortized to cost of revenue
over the estimated useful life of the related products. We have
determined that technological feasibility is reached shortly
before the general release of our software products. Costs
incurred after technological feasibility is established have not
been material, and accordingly, we have expensed the internal
costs relating to research and development when incurred.
Capitalized
Patent Defense Costs
We monitor the anticipated outcome of legal actions, and if we
determine that the success of the defense of a patent is
probable, and so long as we believe that the future economic
benefit of the patent will be increased, we capitalize external
legal costs incurred in the defense of these patents, up to the
level of the expected increased future economic benefit. If
changes in the anticipated outcome occur, we write-off any
capitalized costs in the period the change is determined. Upon
successful defense of the patent, the amounts previously
capitalized are amortized over the remaining life of the patent.
During fiscal 2010, we expensed $6.8 million of deferred
costs included in restructuring and other charges, net as a
result of unsuccessful litigation. As of September 30, 2011
and 2010, there are no capitalized patent defenses costs.
Acquisition-Related
Costs, net
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we adopted the guidance
in ASC 805, Business Combinations. ASC 805
supersedes the previous accounting guidance related to business
combinations, including the measurement of acquirer shares
issued in consideration for a business combination, the
recognition of and subsequent accounting for contingent
consideration, the recognition of acquired in-process research
and development, the accounting for acquisition-related
restructurings, the treatment of acquisition-related transaction
costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirers
income tax valuation allowance. The guidance is applied
prospectively from the date of acquisition with a minor
exception related to income tax contingencies from companies
acquired prior to the adoption date. As a result of our adoption
of the new guidance, we expensed $2.2 million in
acquisition-related transaction costs which were capitalized as
of September 30, 2009. These costs were recorded as expense
within the acquisition-related costs, net line in
the consolidated statement of operations.
Acquisition-related costs include those costs related to
business and other acquisitions, including potential
acquisitions. These costs consist of transition and integration
costs, including retention payments, transitional employee costs
and earn-out payments treated as compensation expense, as well
as the costs of integration-related services provided by
third-parties; professional service fees, including direct
third-party costs of the transaction and post-acquisition legal
and other professional service fees associated with disputes and
regulatory matters related to acquired entities; and adjustments
to acquisition-related items that are required to be marked to
fair value each reporting period, such as contingent
consideration, and other items related to acquisitions for which
the measurement period has ended. Previous to our adoption of
ASC 805, direct transaction costs were included as a part
of the consideration transferred and capitalized as goodwill. In
addition, there were no items under the legacy business
combination accounting guidance that were required to be
re-measured to fair value on a recurring basis.
67
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Transition and integration costs
|
|
$
|
3,361
|
|
|
$
|
13,562
|
|
|
$
|
4,698
|
|
Professional service fees
|
|
|
18,030
|
|
|
|
17,156
|
|
|
|
15,048
|
|
Acquisition-related adjustments
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(4,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,866
|
|
|
$
|
30,611
|
|
|
$
|
15,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are classified as
sales and marketing expenses. Cooperative advertising programs
reimburse customers for marketing activities for certain of our
products, subject to defined criteria. Cooperative advertising
obligations are accrued and the costs expensed at the same time
the related revenue is recognized. Cooperative advertising
expenses are recorded as expense to the extent that an
advertising benefit separate from the revenue transaction can be
identified and the cash paid does not exceed the fair value of
that advertising benefit received. Any excess of cash paid over
the fair value of the advertising benefit received is recorded
as a reduction in revenue. We incurred advertising costs of
$30.6 million, $21.1 million and $15.8 million
for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Convertible
Debt
We separately account for the liability (debt) and equity
(conversion option) components of our convertible debt
instruments that require or permit settlement in cash upon
conversion in a manner that reflects our nonconvertible debt
borrowing rate at the time of issuance. The equity components of
our convertible debt instruments are recorded to
stockholders equity with an offsetting debt discount. The
debt discount created is amortized to interest expense in our
consolidated statement of operations using the effective
interest method over the expected term of the convertible debt.
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the
years in which the differences are expected to reverse. We do
not provide for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed
earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, which we consider to be
indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S.
We make judgments regarding the realizability of our deferred
tax assets. The balance sheet carrying value of our net deferred
tax assets is based on whether we believe that it is more likely
than not that we will generate sufficient future taxable income
to realize these deferred tax assets after consideration of all
available evidence. We regularly review our deferred tax assets
for recoverability considering historical profitability,
projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the
reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning
strategies.
Valuation allowances have been established for U.S. and
certain foreign deferred tax assets, which we believe do not
meet the more likely than not criteria for
recognition. If we are subsequently able to utilize all or a
portion of the deferred tax assets for which a valuation
allowance has been established, then we may be required to
recognize these deferred tax assets through the reduction of the
valuation allowance which could result in a material benefit to
our results of operations in the period in which the benefit is
determined. This benefit will exclude the recognition of the
portion of the valuation allowance which relates to net deferred
tax assets created as a result of stock-based compensation or
other equity transactions where prevailing guidance requires the
change in valuation allowance to be traced forward through
stockholders equity and recorded as additional
paid-in-capital.
We establish reserves for tax uncertainties that reflect the use
of the comprehensive model for the recognition and measurement
of uncertain tax positions. Under the comprehensive model, when
the minimum threshold for
68
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recognition is not met, no tax benefit can be recorded. When the
minimum threshold for recognition is met, a tax position is
recorded as the largest amount that is more than fifty percent
likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, was
approximately $32.1 million, $(18.2) million and
$(24.6) million for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. For the purposes of comprehensive income (loss)
disclosures, we do not record tax provisions or benefits for the
net changes in the foreign currency translation adjustment, as
we intend to reinvest undistributed earnings in our foreign
subsidiaries permanently.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income,
reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss), consisted of the
following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
4,320
|
|
|
$
|
13,067
|
|
|
$
|
15,874
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
(3,982
|
)
|
Net unrealized losses on post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
(1,926
|
)
|
|
|
(4,822
|
)
|
|
|
(4,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,402
|
|
|
$
|
8,505
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentration
of Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant
concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash, cash
equivalents, and trade accounts receivable. We place our cash
and cash equivalents with financial institutions with high
credit ratings. As part of our cash and investment management
processes, we perform periodic evaluations of the credit
standing of the financial institutions with whom we maintain
deposits, and have not recorded any credit losses to-date. For
trade accounts receivable, we perform ongoing credit evaluations
of our customers financial condition and limit the amount
of credit extended when deemed appropriate. At
September 30, 2011 and 2010, no customer accounted for
greater than 10% of our net accounts receivable balance. No
customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue for fiscal
2011, 2010 or 2009.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments including cash equivalents, marketable
securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and
derivative instruments, are carried in the financial statements
at amounts that approximate their fair value based on the short
maturities of those instruments. Refer to Note 10 for
discussion of the fair value of our long-term debt.
Foreign
Currency Translation
We have significant foreign operations and transact business in
various foreign currencies. In general, the functional currency
of a foreign operation is the local countrys currency.
Non-functional currency monetary balances are re-measured into
the functional currency of the subsidiary with any related gain
or loss recorded in other income (expense), net, in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Assets and
liabilities of operations outside the United States, for which
the functional currency is the local currency, are translated
into United States dollars using period-end exchange rates.
Revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange
rates in effect during each fiscal month during the year. The
effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Foreign currency
transaction gains (losses) included in net income (loss) for
fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009 were $(1.1) million,
$3.5 million, and $7.0 million, respectively.
69
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
We utilize derivative instruments to hedge specific financial
risks such as interest rate and foreign exchange risk. We do not
engage in speculative hedging activity. In order for us to
account for a derivative instrument as a hedge, specific
criteria must be met, including: (i) ensuring at the
inception of the hedge that formal documentation exists for both
the hedging relationship and the entitys risk management
objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge and
(ii) at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis,
the hedging relationship is expected to be highly effective in
achieving offsetting changes in fair value attributed to the
hedged risk during the period that the hedge is designated.
Further, an assessment of effectiveness is required whenever
financial statements or earnings are reported. Absent meeting
these criteria, changes in fair value are recognized in other
income (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of
operations. Once the underlying forecasted transaction is
realized, the gain or loss from the derivative designated as a
hedge of the transaction is reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) to the statement of operations, in
the appropriate revenue or expense caption. Any ineffective
portion of the derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is
recognized in current earnings.
Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation to employees and
directors, including grants of employee stock options, purchases
under employee stock purchase plans, awards in the form of
restricted shares (Restricted Stock) and awards in
the form of units of stock purchase rights (Restricted
Units) through recognition of the fair value of the
stock-based compensation as a charge against earnings. We
recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite
service period, net of estimated forfeitures. We will recognize
a benefit from stock-based compensation in equity using the
with-and-without
approach for the utilization of tax attributes. The Restricted
Stock and Restricted Units are collectively referred to as
Restricted Awards.
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
We compute net income (loss) per share in accordance with the
two-class method. Under the two-class method, basic net income
per share is computed by dividing the net income available to
common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Net losses are not
allocated to preferred stockholders. We have determined that our
outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock represents
a participating security and as such the preferred shares are
excluded from basic earnings per share.
Diluted net income per share is computed using the more dilutive
of (a) the two-class method, or (b) the if-converted
method. We allocate net income first to preferred stockholders
based on dividend rights and then to common and preferred
stockholders based on ownership interests. The weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding gives effect to all
potentially dilutive common equivalent shares, including
outstanding stock options and restricted stock, shares held in
escrow, contingently issuable shares under earn-out agreements
once earned, warrants, and potential issuance of stock upon
conversion of our 2.75% Convertible Debentures. The
convertible debentures are considered Instrument C securities
due to the fact that only the excess of the conversion value on
the date of conversion can be paid in our common shares; the
principal portion of the conversion must be paid in cash.
Therefore, only the shares of common stock potentially issuable
with respect to the excess of the conversion value over its
principal amount, if any, is considered as dilutive potential
common shares for purposes of calculating diluted net income per
share. The conversion value for the convertible debentures was
less than the principal amount for each of the years in the
three year period ended September 30, 2011 and no shares
were assumed to be issued for purposes of computing the diluted
net income (loss) per share.
70
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the computation for basic and
diluted net income (loss) per share for the years ended
September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
38,238
|
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,387
|
)
|
Allocation of undistributed earnings to preferred stockholders
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
basic
|
|
$
|
37,793
|
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,387
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
diluted
|
|
$
|
38,238
|
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
302,277
|
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
302,277
|
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
Weighted average effect of dilutive common equivalent shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed conversion of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock compensation plans
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contingently issuable shares
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
315,960
|
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of
diluted net income (loss) per share if their effect is
anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares
aggregating to 3.2 million shares, 20.7 million shares
and 31.6 million shares for the years ended
September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, have been
excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per
share because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-05,
Comprehensive Income. This ASU intends to enhance
comparability and transparency of other comprehensive income
components. The guidance provides an option to present total
comprehensive income, the components of net income and the
components of other comprehensive income in a single continuous
statement or two separate but consecutive statements. This ASU
eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income
components as part of the statement of changes in
shareowners equity. The provisions of this ASU will be
applied retrospectively for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2011. Early application is permitted.
ASU 2011-05
impacts disclosure only and therefore, is not expected to have a
material impact on our financial statements.
71
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-04,
Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and
Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International
Financial Reporting Standards, to provide consistent
definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value
measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between
U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards.
ASU 2011-04
changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances
the disclosure requirements, particularly for level 3 fair
value measurements (as defined in Note 12). ASU
2011-04 is
effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We
are currently evaluating the impact on our fair value measures.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-29,
Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for
Business Combinations, to provide guidelines for how pro
forma disclosures are calculated. In addition, ASU
2010-29
expands the disclosure requirements and requires a description
of the nature and amount of any material, nonrecurring pro forma
adjustments directly attributable to a business combination and
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010. ASU
2010-29
impacts disclosure only and therefore, did not, and is not
expected to, have a material impact on our financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-28,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When
to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting
Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. ASU
2010-28 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010 and amends the criteria for performing Step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or
negative carrying amounts and requires performing Step 2 if
qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not
that a goodwill impairment exists. We do not believe that this
will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (Topic
820) Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASU
2010-06),
which requires additional disclosures about the different
classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, the
valuation techniques and inputs used, the activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements, and transfers between
Levels 1, 2 and 3. Levels 1, 2 and 3 of fair value
measurements are defined in Note 12. ASU
2010-06 was
effective for us for the interim reporting period beginning
January 1, 2010, except for the provisions related to
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
provisions are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those
fiscal years. ASU
2010-06
impacts disclosure only and therefore, did not, and is not
expected to, have a material impact on our financial statements.
2011
Acquisitions
Fiscal
2011 Acquisitions
On June 15, 2011, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Equitrac, a leading provider of print
management solutions, to expand the offerings of our Imaging
segment, for cash consideration of approximately
$162.0 million. The acquisition was a stock purchase and
the goodwill resulting from this acquisition is not expected to
be deductible for tax purposes. The results of operations of
Equitrac have been included in our results of operations from
June 15, 2011.
On June 16, 2011, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of SVOX, a Swiss based seller of speech
recognition, dialog, and
text-to-speech
software products for the automotive, mobile and consumer
electronics industries in our Mobile and Consumer segment. Total
purchase consideration was 87.0 million which
consists of cash consideration of 57.0 million
($80.9 million based on the exchange rate as of the date of
acquisition) and a deferred acquisition payment of
30.0 million ($43.0 million based on the
exchange rate as of the date of acquisition). The deferred
acquisition payment is payable in cash or shares of our common
stock, at our option; 8.3 million of the deferred
acquisition payment is due on June 16, 2012 and the
remaining 21.7 million is due on December 31,
2012. The acquisition was a stock purchase and the goodwill
resulting from this acquisition is not
72
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The results of
operations of SVOX have been included in our results of
operations from June 16, 2011.
A summary of the preliminary allocation of the purchase
consideration for Equitrac and SVOX is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equitrac
|
|
|
SVOX
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
161,950
|
|
|
$
|
80,919
|
|
Deferred acquisition payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
161,950
|
|
|
$
|
123,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts receivable(a)
|
|
|
10,724
|
|
|
|
3,506
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
87,439
|
|
|
|
88,459
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets(b)
|
|
|
91,900
|
|
|
|
42,165
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
10,883
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
203,523
|
|
|
|
136,858
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
(9,664
|
)
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(38,311
|
)
|
|
|
(3,285
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(41,573
|
)
|
|
|
(12,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
161,950
|
|
|
$
|
123,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Accounts receivable have been recorded at their estimated fair
values, which consists of the gross accounts receivable assumed
of $15.2 million, reduced by a fair value reserve of
$1.0 million representing the portion of contractually owed
accounts receivable which we do not expect to be collected. |
|
(b) |
|
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average useful lives, as
determined based on preliminary valuations (dollars in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equitrac
|
|
|
SVOX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
55,800
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
$
|
35,612
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
6,268
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
14,100
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
91,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Fiscal 2011 Acquisitions
During fiscal 2011, we acquired three additional businesses,
primarily to expand our product offerings and enhance our
technology base. The results of operations of these acquisitions
have been included in our consolidated results from their
respective acquisition dates. The total consideration for these
acquisitions was $157.3 million, paid in cash. In
allocating the total purchase consideration for these
acquisitions based on estimated fair values, we preliminarily
recorded $96.2 million of goodwill and $57.8 million
of identifiable intangible assets. The allocations
73
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of the purchase consideration are based upon preliminary
valuations and our estimates and assumptions are subject to
change. Intangible assets acquired included primarily customer
relationships and core and completed technology with weighted
average useful lives of 12.4 years. The acquisitions were
stock acquisitions and the goodwill resulting from these
transactions is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
2010
Acquisitions
Acquisition
of SpinVox
On December 30, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of SpinVox, a UK-based privately-held company
engaged in the business of providing
voicemail-to-text
services, which is included in our Mobile and Consumer segment.
The acquisition was a stock purchase and the goodwill resulting
from this acquisition is not expected to be deductible for tax
purposes. The results of operations of SpinVox have been
included in our results of operations from January 1, 2010.
The results of operations of SpinVox for the one day,
December 31, 2009, of the fiscal first quarter during which
SpinVox was a part of Nuance were excluded from our consolidated
results for the year ended September 30, 2010 as such
amounts for that one day were immaterial.
A summary of the final allocation of the purchase consideration
is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
67,500
|
|
Common Stock(a)
|
|
|
36,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
103,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4,061
|
|
Accounts receivable(b)
|
|
|
12,419
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
5,861
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
32,400
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
109,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
166,052
|
|
Current liabilities(c)
|
|
|
(61,148
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(62,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
103,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Approximately 2.3 million shares of our common stock,
valued at $15.81 per share based on the closing price of our
common stock on the acquisition date, were issued at closing. |
|
(b) |
|
Accounts receivable have been recorded at their estimated fair
value, which consists of the gross accounts receivable assumed
of $15.3 million, reduced by a fair value reserve of
$2.9 million representing the portion of contractually owed
accounts receivable which we do not expect to be collected. |
|
(c) |
|
Current liabilities include a commitment of EUR
25.0 million ($36.0 million based on the
December 31, 2009 exchange rate) fixed obligation, payable
in cash. |
74
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average useful lives, as
determined based on a preliminary valuation (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
23,400
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
32,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Fiscal 2010 Acquisitions
During fiscal 2010, we acquired an additional seven businesses
primarily to expand our product offerings and enhance our
technology base. The results of operations of these companies
have been included in our consolidated results from their
respective acquisition dates. The total consideration for these
acquisitions was $86.3 million, including the issuance of
1.2 million shares of our common stock valued at
$21.8 million. In allocating the total purchase
consideration for these acquisitions based on estimated fair
values, we recorded $43.6 million of goodwill and
$34.5 million of identifiable intangible assets. Intangible
assets acquired included primarily core and completed technology
and customer relationships with weighted average useful lives of
6.5 years. The acquisitions were primarily stock
acquisitions and the goodwill resulting from these acquisitions
is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
2009
Acquisitions
Acquisition
of SNAPin
On October 1, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of SNAPin, a developer of self-service software
for mobile devices, to expand our Enterprise offerings. The
goodwill resulting from this transaction is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes.
In connection with our acquisition of SNAPin, we agreed to make
a contingent earn-out payment of up to $45.0 million to be
paid, if at all, based on the business achieving certain
performance targets that are measurable from the acquisition
date to December 31, 2009. In April 2010, a final earn out
amount of $21.2 million was agreed upon; we issued
593,676 shares of our common stock, valued at
$10.2 million, as our first payment under the earn-out
agreement. The remaining balance was paid in cash in October
2011 and is included in short-term liabilities as of
September 30, 2011.
75
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the final allocation of the purchase consideration
is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock(a)
|
|
$
|
166,253
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock units assumed
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
Contingent earn-out consideration
|
|
|
21,200
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
201,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
6,084
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,972
|
|
Deferred tax asset(b)
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
60,900
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
161,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
233,841
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(2,191
|
)
|
Deferred tax liability(b)
|
|
|
(2,327
|
)
|
Deferred revenue(c)
|
|
|
(27,522
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(32,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
201,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Approximately 9.5 million shares of our common stock valued
at $15.81 per share were issued at closing and 1.1 million
shares valued at $14.11 per share were issued upon release of
shares held in escrow. |
|
(b) |
|
We recorded a deferred tax liability as a result of purchase
accounting associated with SNAPin. This results in an increase
of the net deferred tax asset and a reduction of the
corresponding valuation allowance in the consolidated group.
Therefore, there is no impact on goodwill related to the
deferred tax liability. |
|
(c) |
|
We assumed significant legal performance obligations related to
acquired customer contracts. We estimate the fair market value
of the obligations based on expected costs we will incur to
fulfill the obligation plus a normal profit margin. The fair
value of the legal performance obligations remaining to be
delivered on these customer contracts was approximately
$53.4 million and the remaining cash to be collected on
these contracts was approximately $25.9 million at the date
of acquisition. |
We assumed vested and unvested stock options that were converted
into options to purchase 1,258,708 shares of our common
stock and restricted stock units that were converted into
299,446 shares of our common stock. The fair value of the
assumed vested stock options and restricted stock units as of
the date of acquisition are included in the purchase price
above. The fair value of the assumed vested stock options was
calculated under the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with
the following weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of
0.0%; expected volatility of 55.5%; average risk-free interest
rate of 2.8%; and an expected term of 4.8 years. Assumed
unvested stock options and restricted stock units as of the date
of acquisition will be recorded as stock-based compensation
expense over the requisite service period as disclosed in
Note 17.
76
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average useful lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
21,200
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
60,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Fiscal 2009 Acquisitions
During fiscal 2009, we acquired an additional six businesses
primarily to expand our product offerings and enhance our
technology base. The results of operations of these acquisitions
are included in our consolidated results from their respective
acquisition dates. The total consideration for these
acquisitions was approximately $166.5 million. The gross
purchase price consisted of the issuance of 6.4 million
shares of our common stock valued at $80.9 million,
$76.8 million in cash and $8.8 million for transaction
costs. In allocating the total purchase consideration for these
acquisitions based on estimated fair values, we have recorded
$68.2 million of goodwill, $71.9 million of
identifiable intangible assets, and $26.3 million in net
assets (resulting primarily from cash assumed; acquired unbilled
receivables, net of liabilities assumed including contingencies;
deferred income taxes; and restructuring). We have assumed a
$5.0 million tax contingency established for uncertain
foreign tax positions relating to one of the acquisitions.
Intangible assets acquired included primarily core and completed
technology and customer relationships with weighted average
useful lives of 9.5 years.
|
|
4.
|
Pro Forma
Results (Unaudited)
|
The following table shows unaudited pro forma results of
operations as if we had acquired SpinVox, Equitrac and SVOX on
October 1, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,374,774
|
|
|
$
|
1,190,615
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,425
|
|
|
$
|
(56,734
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
We have not furnished pro forma financial information relating
to our other fiscal 2011 and 2010 acquisitions because such
information is not material, individually or in the aggregate,
to our financial results. The unaudited pro forma results of
operations are not necessarily indicative of the actual results
that would have occurred had the transactions actually taken
place at the beginning of the periods indicated.
|
|
5.
|
Contingent
Acquisition Payments
|
Contingent acquisition payment arrangements related to our
acquisition of Snapin in 2009 are discussed above in
Note 3. In addition, we remain a party to certain
contingent consideration arrangements relative to acquisitions
completed in other fiscal years. Those arrangements are
discussed below.
Earn-out
Payments
For business combinations occurring subsequent to the adoption
of ASC 805 in fiscal 2010, the fair value of any contingent
consideration is established at the acquisition date and
included in the total purchase price. The contingent
consideration is then adjusted to fair value as an increase or
decrease in current earnings in each
77
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
reporting period. Contingent consideration related to
acquisitions prior to our adoption of ASC 805 have been and
will continue to be recorded as additional purchase price when
the contingency is resolved and additional consideration is
attributable.
In connection with an immaterial acquisition during fiscal 2010,
we agreed to make contingent earn-out payments of up to
$2.5 million, payable in stock, upon the achievement of
certain financial targets for calendar year 2010 and 2011. At
the acquisition date, we recorded $1.0 million as the fair
value of the contingent consideration. For the years ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010, we have recorded (expense)
income of $(1.1) million and $0.3 million as fair
value adjustments included in acquisition-related costs, net in
our consolidated statement of operations. In September 2011, we
paid $0.5 million in cash and stock to the former
shareholders related to the calendar year 2010 earn-out.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, Inc.
(Vocada) in November 2007, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $21.0 million upon
the achievement of certain financial targets measured over
defined periods through December 31, 2010, in accordance
with the merger agreement. We have notified the former
shareholders of Vocada that the financial targets were not
achieved. In December 2010, the former shareholders filed a
demand for arbitration in accordance with their rights under the
merger agreement. At September 30, 2011, we have not
recorded any obligation relative to these earn-out provisions.
In connection with our acquisition of Commissure, Inc.
(Commissure) in September 2007, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $8.0 million, payable
in stock, or cash, solely at our discretion, upon the
achievement of certain financial targets for the fiscal years
2008, 2009 and 2010. In February 2011, we paid $1.0 million
upon determination of the final earn-out achievement and
recorded the payment as additional purchase price allocated to
goodwill.
In connection with our acquisition of Phonetic Systems Ltd.
(Phonetic) in February 2005, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of $35 million upon
achievement of certain established financial and performance
targets, in accordance with the merger agreement. In December
2009, we paid $11.3 million to the former shareholders of
Phonetic in final settlement of the contingent earn-out
provisions and recorded the amount paid as additional purchase
price related to the Phonetic acquisition.
Escrow
and Holdback Arrangements
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have placed
either cash or shares of our common stock in escrow to satisfy
any indemnification claims we may have. If no claims are made,
the escrowed amounts will be released to the former shareholders
of the acquired companies. Historically, in accordance with the
previous accounting guidance in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141), we could not make a
determination, beyond a reasonable doubt, whether the escrow
would become payable to the former shareholders of these
companies until the escrow period had expired. Accordingly these
amounts were treated as contingent purchase price until it was
determined that the escrow was payable, at which time the
escrowed amounts would be recorded as additional purchase price
and allocated to goodwill. Under the revised accounting guidance
of ASC 805, escrow payments are generally considered part
of the initial purchase consideration and accounted for as
goodwill.
During fiscal 2011, the last remaining escrowed amounts
accounted for under previous accounting guidance expired.
Payments totaling $5.2 million were released to former
shareholders of X-Solutions Group B.V. and eCopy, Inc. and were
recorded as an increase to goodwill during the period.
78
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
Effective in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we changed our
reporting segments to four reportable segments. The changes in
the carrying amount of goodwill for our four reportable segments
for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 were as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
613,973
|
|
|
$
|
786,738
|
|
|
$
|
442,701
|
|
|
$
|
47,591
|
|
|
$
|
1,891,003
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
28,681
|
|
|
|
123,867
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,076
|
|
Escrow amounts released(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments(2)
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
19,509
|
|
|
|
12,947
|
|
|
|
30,111
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(3,605
|
)
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(1,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
637,109
|
|
|
$
|
910,890
|
|
|
$
|
465,920
|
|
|
$
|
64,024
|
|
|
$
|
2,077,943
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
35,128
|
|
|
|
109,747
|
|
|
|
39,792
|
|
|
|
87,439
|
|
|
|
272,106
|
|
Escrow amounts released(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(1,646
|
)
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(5,874
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(6,535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
672,649
|
|
|
$
|
1,018,415
|
|
|
$
|
500,240
|
|
|
$
|
156,576
|
|
|
$
|
2,347,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In accordance with the prior guidance in SFAS 141 discussed
in Note 5 above, we recorded the release of escrow amounts
upon the expiration of the escrow periods as additional purchase
price and allocated to goodwill. |
|
(2) |
|
Goodwill adjustments for our Enterprise segment in fiscal 2010
included an $11.3 million increase related to the Phonetic
earn-out payment and an $8.3 million increase related to
the SNAPin earn-out liability upon determination of the final
earn-out achievement. The goodwill adjustment for our Imaging
segment in fiscal 2010 included a $13.1 million increase in
goodwill due to the change in the fair value estimate of
acquired intangible assets from our acquisition of eCopy in
fiscal 2009. |
Intangible assets consist of the following as of
September 30, 2011 and 2010, which includes
$130.3 million and $151.0 million of licensed
technology, respectively (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
727,284
|
|
|
$
|
(302,979
|
)
|
|
$
|
424,305
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
428,597
|
|
|
|
(167,838
|
)
|
|
|
260,759
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Trade names, trademarks, and other
|
|
|
68,560
|
|
|
|
(23,337
|
)
|
|
|
45,223
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
|
|
(1,479
|
)
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,227,210
|
|
|
$
|
(495,633
|
)
|
|
$
|
731,577
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
597,672
|
|
|
$
|
(231,079
|
)
|
|
$
|
366,593
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
389,508
|
|
|
|
(124,607
|
)
|
|
|
264,901
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Trade names, trademarks, and other
|
|
|
38,798
|
|
|
|
(14,047
|
)
|
|
|
24,751
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
(3,248
|
)
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,031,046
|
|
|
|
(372,981
|
)
|
|
|
658,065
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Trade name, indefinite life
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,058,846
|
|
|
$
|
(372,981
|
)
|
|
$
|
685,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2010 we purchased patents and licenses totaling
$45 million, which is included with the technology and
patents category. We made payments to third parties of both cash
and shares of our common stock in connection with these
acquisitions. A total of 2,180,600 shares of our common
stock were issued subject to price guarantees as described
further in Note 11. The weighted average useful life
related to these acquired assets is 10 years.
In June 2009, we entered into a joint marketing and selling
agreement with a third party and paid $7.0 million in
consideration of the arrangement. We have capitalized the
payment as an intangible asset, included in the trade names,
trademarks, and other category above, and assigned a useful life
of 3 years, commensurate with the legal term of the rights
in the arrangement. In addition to the $7.0 million paid in
June 2009, we issued 879,567 shares of our common stock
valued at $13.0 million in December 2009 upon the third
party meeting certain performance criteria under the agreement.
The additional $13.0 million was capitalized in fiscal 2010
and classified in the same manner as the initial
$7.0 million payment.
Amortization expense for acquired technology and patents is
included in the cost of revenue from amortization of intangible
assets in the accompanying statements of operations and amounted
to $55.1 million, $47.8 million and $38.4 million
in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Amortization
expense for customer relationships, trade names, trademarks, and
other, and non-competition agreements is included in operating
expenses and amounted to $88.2 million, $87.8 million
and $77.0 million in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the
five succeeding years as of September 30, 2011, is as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
55,311
|
|
|
$
|
86,376
|
|
|
$
|
141,687
|
|
2013
|
|
|
48,896
|
|
|
|
73,705
|
|
|
|
122,601
|
|
2014
|
|
|
39,631
|
|
|
|
64,201
|
|
|
|
103,832
|
|
2015
|
|
|
35,949
|
|
|
|
55,358
|
|
|
|
91,307
|
|
2016
|
|
|
29,693
|
|
|
|
45,996
|
|
|
|
75,689
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
51,279
|
|
|
|
145,182
|
|
|
|
196,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
260,759
|
|
|
$
|
470,818
|
|
|
$
|
731,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounts receivable, excluding acquired unbilled accounts
receivable, consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
280,620
|
|
|
$
|
214,861
|
|
Unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
11,506
|
|
|
|
15,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross accounts receivable
|
|
|
292,126
|
|
|
|
230,717
|
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(5,707
|
)
|
|
|
(6,301
|
)
|
Less allowance for sales returns
|
|
|
(6,233
|
)
|
|
|
(6,829
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
280,186
|
|
|
$
|
217,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Land,
Building and Equipment, Net
|
Land, building and equipment, net at September 30, 2011 and
2010 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
Building
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
5,363
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
13,048
|
|
|
|
5,786
|
|
Computers, software and equipment
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
136,204
|
|
|
|
108,278
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
2-7
|
|
|
|
19,315
|
|
|
|
15,659
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
10,759
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,634
|
|
|
|
148,907
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,416
|
)
|
|
|
(86,824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
78,218
|
|
|
$
|
62,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense, associated with building and equipment,
for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $27.6 million,
$21.6 million and $18.7 million, respectively.
81
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses consisted of the following (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$
|
97,929
|
|
|
$
|
56,047
|
|
Sales and marketing incentives(a)
|
|
|
16,253
|
|
|
|
40,780
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
11,975
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
Sales and other taxes payable
|
|
|
9,876
|
|
|
|
5,211
|
|
Cost of revenue related liabilities
|
|
|
8,698
|
|
|
|
10,028
|
|
Accrued business combination costs
|
|
|
8,275
|
|
|
|
10,197
|
|
Acquisition costs and liabilities
|
|
|
8,414
|
|
|
|
4,970
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
4,240
|
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,414
|
|
|
|
10,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
176,074
|
|
|
$
|
151,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The decrease in accrued sales and marketing incentives was
driven by an 18.0 million ($23.4 million
equivalent) payment in December 2010 for a fixed obligation
assumed in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox. The
related 18.0 million of restricted cash was placed in
an irrevocable standby letter of credit account at the end of
fiscal year 2010 and was released upon satisfaction of the
liability in December 2010. At September 30, 2011, we have
an additional 5.0 million ($6.8 million
equivalent) of restricted cash that has been placed in an
irrevocable standby letter of credit for a related liability. |
|
|
10.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
|
At September 30, 2011 and 2010, we had the following
borrowing obligations (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible Debentures due 2027, net of unamortized
discount of $27.4 million and $36.3 million,
respectively
|
|
$
|
222,557
|
|
|
$
|
213,654
|
|
Credit Facility
|
|
|
636,941
|
|
|
|
643,563
|
|
Obligations under capital leases and other
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
859,925
|
|
|
|
858,778
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
6,905
|
|
|
|
7,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
853,020
|
|
|
$
|
851,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of our long-term debt approximated
$937.8 million and $902.2 million at
September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These fair value
amounts represent the value at which our lenders could trade our
debt within the financial markets, and do not represent the
settlement value of these long-term debt liabilities to us at
each reporting date. The fair value of the long-term debt issues
will continue to vary each period based on fluctuations in
market interest rates, as well as changes to our credit ratings.
The term loan portion of our Credit Facility is traded and the
fair values are based upon traded prices as of the reporting
dates. The fair values of the 2.75% Convertible Debentures
due 2027 at each respective reporting date were estimated using
the averages of the September 30, 2011 and
September 30, 2010 bid and ask trading quotes. We had no
outstanding balance on the revolving credit line portion of our
Credit Facility. Our capital lease obligations and other debt
are not traded and the fair values of these instruments are
assumed to approximate their carrying values as of
September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010.
82
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2.75% Convertible
Debentures due 2027
On August 13, 2007, we issued $250 million of 2.75%
convertible senior debentures due in 2027 (the 2027
Debentures) in a private placement to Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. Total proceeds,
net of debt discount of $7.5 million and deferred debt
issuance costs of $1.1 million, were $241.4 million.
The 2027 Debentures bear an interest rate of 2.75% per annum,
payable semi-annually in arrears beginning on February 15,
2008, and mature on August 15, 2027 subject to the right of
the holders of the 2027 Debentures to require us to redeem the
2027 Debentures on August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. In
accordance with
ASC 470-20,
Debt with Conversion and Other Options, the difference of
$54.7 million between the fair value of the liability
component of the 2027 Debentures and the net proceeds on the
date of issuance have been recorded as additional
paid-in-capital
and as debt discount. The aggregate debt discount is being
amortized to interest expense using the effective interest rate
method through August 2014. As of September 30, 2011 and
2010, the ending unamortized discount was $27.4 million and
$36.3 million, respectively, and the ending unamortized
deferred debt issuance costs were $0.3 million and
$0.4 million, respectively. The 2027 Debentures are general
senior unsecured obligations, ranking equally in right of
payment to all of our existing and future unsecured,
unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to
any indebtedness that is contractually subordinated to the 2027
Debentures. The 2027 Debentures are effectively subordinated to
our secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the
collateral securing such indebtedness and are structurally
subordinated to indebtedness and other liabilities of our
subsidiaries. If converted, the principal amount of the 2027
Debentures is payable in cash and any amounts payable in excess
of the $250 million principal amount, will (based on an
initial conversion rate, which represents an initial conversion
price of $19.47 per share, subject to adjustment) be paid in
cash or shares of our common stock, at our election, only in the
following circumstances and to the following extent: (i) on
any date during any fiscal quarter beginning after
September 30, 2007 (and only during such fiscal quarter) if
the closing sale price of our common stock was more than 120% of
the then current conversion price for at least 20 trading days
in the period of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the
last trading day of the previous fiscal quarter;
(ii) during the five consecutive
business-day
period following any five consecutive
trading-day
period in which the trading price for $1,000 principal amount of
the Debentures for each day during such five
trading-day
period was less than 98% of the closing sale price of our common
stock multiplied by the then current conversion rate;
(iii) upon the occurrence of specified corporate
transactions, as described in the indenture for the 2027
Debentures; and (iv) at the option of the holder at any
time on or after February 15, 2027. Additionally, we may
redeem the 2027 Debentures, in whole or in part, on or after
August 20, 2014 at par plus accrued and unpaid interest;
each holder shall have the right, at such holders option,
to require us to repurchase all or any portion of the 2027
Debentures held by such holder on August 15, 2014,
August 15, 2017 and August 15, 2022. Upon conversion,
we will pay the principal amount in cash and any amounts payable
in excess of the $250 million principal amount will be paid in
cash or shares of our common stock, at our election. If we
undergo a fundamental change (as described in the indenture for
the 2027 Debentures) prior to maturity, holders will have the
option to require us to repurchase all or any portion of their
debentures for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the debentures to be purchased plus any accrued and
unpaid interest, including any additional interest to, but
excluding, the repurchase date. As of September 30, 2011,
no conversion triggers were met. If the conversion triggers were
met, we could be required to repay all or some of the principal
amount in cash prior to the maturity date.
Credit
Facility
We entered into a credit facility which consists of a
$75 million revolving credit line including letters of
credit, a $355 million term loan entered into on
March 31, 2006, a $90 million term loan entered into
on April 5, 2007 and a $225 million term loan entered
into on August 24, 2007 (the Credit Facility).
In July 2011, we entered into agreements to amend and restate
our existing Credit Facility. Of the approximately
$638.5 million remaining Term Loan, lenders representing
$493.2 million elected to extend the maturity date by three
years to March 31, 2016. The remaining $145.3 million
in term loans are due March 2013. In addition, lenders
participating in the revolving credit facility have chosen to
extend the maturity date by three years to March 31, 2015.
As of September 30, 2011,
83
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$636.9 million remained outstanding under the term loans,
there were $15.4 million of letters of credit issued under
the revolving credit line and there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line.
The Credit Facility contains covenants, including, among other
things, covenants that restrict our ability and those of our
subsidiaries to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or
permit liens on assets, enter into sale-leaseback transactions,
make loans or investments, sell assets, make certain
acquisitions, pay dividends, or repurchase stock. The agreement
also contains events of default, including failure to make
payments of principal or interest, failure to observe covenants,
breaches of representations and warranties, defaults under
certain other material indebtedness, failure to satisfy material
judgments, a change of control and certain insolvency events. As
of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the
covenants under the Credit Facility.
Under terms of the amended Credit Agreement, interest is payable
monthly at a rate equal to the applicable margin plus, at our
option, either (a) the base rate which is the higher of the
corporate base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal
funds rate plus 0.50% per annum or (b) LIBOR (equal to
(i) the British Bankers Association Interest
Settlement Rates for deposits in U.S. dollars divided by
(ii) one minus the statutory reserves applicable to such
borrowing). The applicable margin for the borrowings is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Base Rate Margin
|
|
LIBOR Margin
|
|
Term loans maturing March 2013
|
|
0.75% - 1.50%(a)
|
|
1.75% - 2.50%(a)
|
Term loans maturing March 2016
|
|
2.00%
|
|
3.00%
|
Revolving facility due March 2015
|
|
1.25% - 2.25%(b)
|
|
2.25% - 3.25%(b)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The margin is determined based on our leverage ratio and credit
rating at the date the interest rates are reset on the Term
Loans. |
|
(b) |
|
The margin is determined based on our leverage ratio and credit
rating at the date the interest rates are reset on the revolving
credit line. |
At September 30, 2011 the applicable margins were 1.75%,
with an effective rate of 1.98%, on the remaining balance of
$145.0 million maturing in March 2013 and 3.00%, with an
effective rate of 3.23%, on the remaining balance of $492.0
million maturing in March 2016. We are required to pay a
commitment fee for unutilized commitments under the revolving
credit facility at a rate ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% per
annum, based upon our leverage ratio. As of September 30,
2011, the commitment fee rate was 0.375%.
We capitalized debt issuance costs related to the Credit
Facility and are amortizing the costs to interest expense using
the effective interest rate method, through March 2013 for costs
associated with the unextended portion of the term loan, through
March 2015 for costs associated with the revolving credit
facility and through March 2016 for the remainder of the
balance. As of September 30, 2011 and 2010, the ending
unamortized deferred financing fees were $5.8 million and
$5.8 million, respectively, and are included in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Credit Facility amendment extended the payment terms on a
portion of the loan. Principal is due in quarterly installments
of 0.25% of the then outstanding balance through the original
maturity date of March 2013 for $145.3 million,
representing the portion of the loan that was not extended.
Principal payments on the extended loan of $493.2 are due in
quarterly installments of 0.25% of the then outstanding balance
through March 2016, at which point the remaining balance becomes
due. In addition, an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined
in the Credit Facility, is payable in the first quarter of each
fiscal year, based on the excess cash flow generated in the
previous fiscal year. We have not generated excess cash flows in
any period and no additional payments are required. We will
continue to evaluate the extent to which a payment is due in the
first quarter of future fiscal years based on excess cash flow
generation. At the current time, we are unable to predict the
amount of the outstanding principal, if any, that may be
required to be repaid in future fiscal years pursuant to the
excess cash flow sweep provisions. Any term loan borrowings not
paid through the baseline repayment, the excess cash flow sweep,
or any other mandatory or optional payments that we may make,
will be repaid upon maturity. If only the baseline
84
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
repayments are made, the annual aggregate principal amount of
the term loans repaid would be as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
6,346
|
|
2013
|
|
|
148,385
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,804
|
|
2015
|
|
|
4,756
|
|
2016
|
|
|
472,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
636,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our obligations under the Credit Facility are unconditionally
guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions, each of our
existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The Credit Facility and the guarantees thereof are
secured by first priority liens and security interests in the
following: 100% of the capital stock of substantially all of our
domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the outstanding voting equity
interests and 100% of the non-voting equity interests of
first-tier foreign subsidiaries, all our material tangible and
intangible assets and those of the guarantors, and any present
and future intercompany debt. The Credit Facility also contains
provisions for mandatory prepayments of outstanding term loans
upon receipt of the following, and subject to certain
exceptions: 100% of net cash proceeds from asset sales, 100% of
net cash proceeds from issuance or incurrence of debt, and 100%
of extraordinary receipts. We may voluntarily prepay borrowings
under the Credit Facility without premium or penalty other than
breakage costs, as defined with respect to LIBOR-based loans.
|
|
11.
|
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
Cash
Flow Hedges
Forward
Currency Contracts
We enter into foreign currency contracts to hedge the
variability of cash flows in Canadian dollars (CAD) and
Hungarian forints (HUF) which are designated as cash flow
hedges. These contracts settle in October 2011. At
September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, the
notional value and the aggregate cumulative unrealized gains on
the outstanding contracts were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Cumulative
|
|
|
|
Notional Value
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Canadian dollars
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
$
|
13,004
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
Hungarian forints
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
4,564
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contracts designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
17,568
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Derivatives not Designated as Hedges
Forward
Currency Contracts
We operate our business in countries throughout the world and
transact business in various foreign currencies. Our foreign
currency exposures typically arise from transactions denominated
in currencies other than the local functional currency of our
operations. During fiscal 2011, we commenced a program that
primarily utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to offset
these risks associated with the effect of certain foreign
currency exposures. We commenced this program so that increases
or decreases in our foreign currency exposures are offset by
gains or losses on the foreign currency forward contracts in
order to mitigate the risks and volatility associated with our
85
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
foreign currency transactions. Generally, we enter into
contracts for less than 90 days, and at September 30,
2011 we had outstanding contracts with a total notional value of
$75.7 million.
We have not designated these forward contracts as hedging
instruments pursuant to ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging
and accordingly, we recorded the fair value of these
contracts at the end of each reporting period in our
consolidated balance sheet, with changes in the fair value
recorded in earnings as other income, net in our consolidated
statement of operations. During the year ended
September 30, 2011, we recorded losses of $2.3 million
associated with these contracts.
During fiscal 2010, we entered into a euro 18 million
foreign currency contract to offset the foreign currency
exposure on a fixed obligation assumed in connection with our
acquisition of SpinVox in December 2009. The contract matured in
December 2010 and the realized gain was recorded in other
income, net and was offset by the corresponding realized loss on
the settlement of the obligation.
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we entered
into foreign currency forward contracts to offset foreign
currency exposure on the deferred acquisition payment of
44.3 million related to our acquisition of PSRS. The
foreign currency contracts matured and were settled on
October 22, 2009. The gain for the period from
September 30, 2009 to settlement on October 22, 2009
was $1.6 million, which was offset in other income, net by
the loss resulting from the corresponding change in the
associated deferred acquisition payment liability.
Security
Price Guarantees
From time to time we enter into agreements that allow us to
issue shares of our common stock as part or all of the
consideration related to partnering and technology acquisition
activities. Generally these shares are issued subject to
security price guarantees which are accounted for as
derivatives. We have determined that these instruments would not
be considered equity instruments if they were freestanding. The
security price guarantees require payment from either us to a
third party, or from a third party to us, based upon the
difference between the price of our common stock on the issue
date and an average price of our common stock approximately six
months following the issue date. Changes in the fair value of
these security price guarantees are reported in earnings in each
period as other income, net. During the years ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded $13.2 million
and $4.0 million, respectively of gains associated with
these contracts and received net cash payments totaling
$9.4 million and $7.3 million, respectively, upon the
settlement of agreements during the year.
The following is a summary of the outstanding shares subject to
security price guarantees at September 30, 2011 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value of Shares
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Settlement Date
|
|
on Issue Date
|
|
|
April 1, 2011
|
|
|
127,878
|
|
|
October 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
June 25, 2011
|
|
|
123,275
|
|
|
December 25, 2011
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
August 18, 2011
|
|
|
1,023,360
|
|
|
February 18, 2012
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
86
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a quantitative summary of the fair
value of our hedged and non-hedged derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Security Price Guarantees
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security Price Guarantees
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) value of non-hedged derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,756
|
|
|
$
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value of hedged derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize the activity of derivative
instruments for the fiscal 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Derivatives
Not Designated as Hedges for the Fiscal Year Ended September
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(2,332
|
)
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
Security price guarantees
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
13,230
|
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
Derivatives
Designated as Hedges for the Fiscal Year Ended September
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
1,189
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,479
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(503
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an
asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Valuation techniques must maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When determining
the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required
to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most
advantageous market in
87
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
which we would transact and consider assumptions that market
participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such
as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of
nonperformance.
ASC 820, Fair Value Measures and Disclosures, establishes
a value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the third is considered
unobservable:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1. Quoted prices for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets which we can access.
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Observable inputs other than
those described as Level 1.
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs.
|
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at September 30, 2011 and 2010 consisted of (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds(a)
|
|
$
|
258,001
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
258,001
|
|
Time deposits(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,832
|
|
US government agency securities(a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Marketable securities, $31,256 at cost(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,244
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Security price guarantees(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
259,001
|
|
|
$
|
83,872
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
342,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
Contingent earn-out(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,358
|
|
|
$
|
2,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds(a)
|
|
$
|
470,845
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
470,845
|
|
US government agency securities(a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Marketable securities, $33,337 at cost(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,366
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
471,845
|
|
|
$
|
34,862
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
506,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security price guarantees(c)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
Interest rate swaps(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
Contingent earn-out(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Money market funds and US government agency securities, included
in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheet,
are valued at quoted market prices in active markets. |
88
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
The fair value of our time deposits, marketable securities and
foreign currency exchange contracts is based on the most recent
observable inputs for similar instruments in active markets or
quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets
that are not active or are directly or indirectly observable. |
|
(c) |
|
The fair values of the security price guarantees are determined
using a modified Black-Scholes model, derived from observable
inputs such as US treasury interest rates, our common stock
price, and the volatility of our common stock. The valuation
model values both the put and call components of the guarantees
simultaneously, with the net value of those components
representing the fair value of each instrument. |
|
(d) |
|
The fair value of our contingent consideration arrangement is
determined based on the Companys evaluation as to the
probability and amount of any earn-out that will be achieved
based on expected future performance by the acquired entity, as
well as our common stock price since the contingent
consideration arrangement is payable in shares of our common
stock. Refer to Note 5 for additional information. |
|
(e) |
|
The fair values of the interest rate swaps are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses that factor in observable market
inputs such as LIBOR based yield curves, forward
rates, and credit spreads. |
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value
of our Level 3 financial instruments for the years ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
Earn-out liability established at time of acquisition
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
Charges (credits) to acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
724
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
Charges (credits) to acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items Measured
at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we performed our annual
impairment test for our goodwill and indefinite lived intangible
asset. Our indefinite-lived intangible asset is the Dictaphone
trade name used in our Healthcare segment which was acquired in
March 2006. A change in marketing strategy became effective in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 that will result in rebranding
a number of our Healthcare offerings, and we will no longer be
using the Dictaphone trade name for any new product offerings.
This new marketing strategy caused us to update our revenue
forecasts used in estimating the fair value of the trade name.
Because the Dictaphone trade name will no longer be used for new
product offerings, we adjusted the future revenues associated
with the Dictaphone trade name in estimating the fair value of
the asset. We calculated the fair value of the Dictaphone trade
name using a discounted cash flow model based on the adjusted
forecast for the existing customer base using the historical
products that continue to use the existing trade name
designation. In performing our analysis, we used assumptions
that we believe a market participant would utilize in valuing
the trade name. We determined the fair value of the Dictaphone
trade name to be $16.1 million with an estimated remaining
useful life of fifteen years and recorded an impairment of
$11.7 million ($1.2 million, net of taxes) in
restructuring and other charges, net.
|
|
13.
|
Accrued
Business Combination Costs
|
We have, in connection with certain of our business
combinations, incurred restructuring costs. Restructuring costs
are typically comprised of severance costs, costs of
consolidating duplicate facilities and contract termination
costs. In accordance with our adoption of ASC 805 in fiscal
2010, restructuring expenses are recognized at the date of
acquisition if such restructuring costs meet the recognition
criteria in ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.
Prior to our adoption of ASC 805, restructuring
expenses were recognized based upon plans that
89
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
were committed to by management at the date of acquisition, but
were generally subject to refinement during the purchase price
allocation period (generally within one year of the acquisition
date). In addition to plans resulting from the business
combination, previous acquisitions have included companies which
have established liabilities relating to lease exit costs as a
result of their previous restructuring activities. Regardless of
the origin of the lease exit costs, we are required to make
assumptions relating to sublease terms, sublease rates and
discount rates. We base our estimates and assumptions on the
best information available at the time of the obligation having
arisen. These estimates are reviewed and revised as facts and
circumstances dictate, with any changes being recorded to
goodwill (for acquisitions completed prior to October
2009) or restructuring and other charges, net. Changes in
these estimates could have a material effect on the amount
accrued on the balance sheet.
In connection with the acquisitions of SpeechWorks
International, Inc. in August 2003 and Former Nuance in
September 2005, we assumed two individually significant lease
obligations that were abandoned prior to the acquisition dates.
These obligations expire in 2016 and 2012, respectively, and the
fair value of the obligations, net of estimated sublease income,
was recognized as a liability assumed by us in the allocation of
the final purchase price. The net payments have been discounted
in calculating the fair value of these obligations, and the
discount is being accreted through the term of the lease. Cash
payments net of sublease receipts are presented as cash used in
financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash
flows.
Additionally, prior to the adoption of ASC 805, we
implemented restructuring plans to eliminate duplicate
facilities, personnel or assets in connection with business
combinations. These costs were recognized as liabilities
assumed, and accordingly are included in the allocation of the
purchase price, generally resulting in an increase to the
recorded amount of the goodwill.
The activity for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010
and 2009, relating to all facilities and personnel recorded in
accrued business combination costs, is as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
41,178
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,178
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
2,689
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
9,080
|
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
|
(3,894
|
)
|
|
|
(14,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
34,551
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
37,048
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(759
|
)
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
(769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(769
|
)
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(11,137
|
)
|
|
|
(1,579
|
)
|
|
|
(12,716
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
23,871
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
24,030
|
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(11,760
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(11,819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
12,955
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
8,275
|
|
|
$
|
10,197
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
4,680
|
|
|
|
13,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,955
|
|
|
$
|
24,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges, net
|
Fiscal
2011
For fiscal 2011, we recorded net restructuring and other charges
of $23.0 million, which consisted primarily of an
$11.7 million impairment charge related to our Dictaphone
trade name resulting from a recent change in our Healthcare
marketing strategy under which we plan to consolidate our brands
and will no longer be using the Dictaphone trade name in our new
product offerings. In addition, we recorded a $9.1 million
charge related to the elimination of approximately
200 personnel across multiple functions primarily to
eliminate duplicative positions as a result of businesses
acquired during the year and a $1.9 million charge related
to the elimination or consolidation of excess facilities.
Fiscal
2010
For fiscal 2010, we recorded net restructuring and other charges
of $18.7 million, which consisted primarily of
$9.6 million related to the elimination of approximately
175 personnel across multiple functions within our company,
including acquired entities, a $6.8 million write-off of
previously capitalized patent defense costs as a result of
unsuccessful litigation and $2.1 million of contract
termination costs.
Fiscal
2009
In fiscal 2009, we recorded restructuring and other charges of
$5.4 million, of which $5.3 million related to the
elimination of approximately 220 personnel across multiple
functions within our company.
The following table sets forth the fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009
accrual activity relating to restructuring and other charges
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
759
|
|
|
$
|
1,393
|
|
|
$
|
2,518
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(5,042
|
)
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
(1,396
|
)
|
|
|
(6,982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
9,634
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
8,871
|
|
|
|
18,660
|
|
Non-cash adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,833
|
)
|
|
|
(6,833
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(8,403
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(2,066
|
)
|
|
|
(10,651
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,838
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
9,077
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
11,983
|
|
|
|
22,950
|
|
Non-cash adjustment
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,890
|
)
|
|
|
(11,682
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(6,002
|
)
|
|
|
(1,233
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(7,328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
5,121
|
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restructuring and other charges, net by segment are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
1,378
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
1,405
|
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fiscal year 2009
|
|
$
|
5,283
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
5,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
814
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
814
|
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
5,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
7,345
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
1,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,794
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
8,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fiscal year 2010
|
|
$
|
9,634
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
8,871
|
|
|
$
|
18,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,725
|
|
|
$
|
12,144
|
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
5,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,091
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,171
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fiscal year 2011
|
|
$
|
9,077
|
|
|
$
|
1,890
|
|
|
$
|
11,983
|
|
|
$
|
22,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
Cash
paid for Interest and Income Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
23,034
|
|
|
$
|
27,899
|
|
|
$
|
33,857
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
15,949
|
|
|
$
|
14,215
|
|
|
$
|
18,227
|
|
Non
Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
During fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, we issued shares of our
common stock in connection with several of our business and
asset acquisitions, including shares initially held in escrow.
Note 3 details the shares of our common stock, including
per share prices thereof, issued in fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009
to complete business acquisitions during those years.
Note 6 details the same information with regard to our
fiscal 2011 and 2010 intangible asset acquisitions. In addition,
in connection with certain collaboration agreements we have
issued shares of our common stock to our partners in
satisfaction of our payment obligations under the terms of the
agreements, which is discussed in Note 2.
92
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Preferred
Stock
We are authorized to issue up to 40,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. We have designated
100,000 shares as Series A Preferred Stock and
15,000,000 shares as Series B Preferred Stock. In
connection with the acquisition of ScanSoft from Xerox
Corporation (Xerox), we issued 3,562,238 shares
of Series B Preferred Stock to Xerox. On March 19,
2004, we announced that Warburg Pincus, a global private equity
firm, had agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of our stock
held by Xerox Corporation for approximately $80 million,
including the 3,562,238 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into
shares of common stock on a
one-for-one
basis and has a liquidation preference of $1.30 per share plus
all declared but unpaid dividends. The holders of Series B
Preferred Stock are entitled to non-cumulative dividends at the
rate of $0.05 per annum per share, payable when, and if,
declared by the Board of Directors. To date, no dividends have
been declared by the Board of Directors. Holders of
Series B Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except
those rights provided under Delaware law. The undesignated
shares of preferred stock will have rights, preferences,
privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, dividend
rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation
preferences, as shall be determined by the Board of Directors
upon issuance of the preferred stock. We have reserved
3,562,238 shares of our common stock for issuance upon
conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock. Other than the
3,562,238 shares of Series B Preferred Stock that are
issued and outstanding, there are no other shares of preferred
stock issued or outstanding in fiscal 2011 or fiscal 2010.
Common
Stock and Common Stock Warrants
Private
Placements of Securities
We have, from time to time, entered into stock and warrant
agreements with Warburg Pincus. In connection with these
agreements, we granted Warburg Pincus the right to request that
we use commercially reasonable efforts to register some or all
of the shares of common stock issued to them under each of their
purchase transactions, including shares of common stock
underlying the warrants. The following table summarizes the
warrant and stock activities with Warburg Pincus during the
three year period ended September 30, 2011:
Warrants
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Proceeds Received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
April 7, 2010
|
|
$
|
4.94
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,350
|
|
September 15, 2009
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
3,177,570
|
|
|
|
15,888
|
|
July 29, 2009
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
863,236
|
|
|
|
4,316
|
|
July 29, 2009
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
525,732
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Common
Stock Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Price per Share
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Proceeds Received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
January 29, 2009
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
17,395,626
|
|
|
$
|
175,046
|
|
At September 30, 2011, Warburg Pincus holds the following
warrants to purchase shares of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance Date
|
|
Price per Share
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
January 29, 2009
|
|
$
|
11.57
|
|
|
|
3,862,422
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2013
|
|
May 20, 2008
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
May 20, 2012
|
|
93
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We have determined that all of our common stock warrants should
be classified within the stockholders equity section of
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets based on the
conclusion that the above-noted warrants are indexed to our
common stock and are exercisable only into our common stock.
|
|
17.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
We recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite
service period. Our share-based awards are accounted for as
equity instruments. The amounts included in the consolidated
statements of operations relating to stock-based compensation
are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Cost of professional services, subscription and hosting
|
|
|
27,814
|
|
|
|
11,043
|
|
|
|
9,889
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
24,289
|
|
|
|
9,381
|
|
|
|
9,840
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
43,264
|
|
|
|
38,152
|
|
|
|
27,057
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
49,707
|
|
|
|
40,779
|
|
|
|
23,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
147,296
|
|
|
$
|
100,139
|
|
|
$
|
71,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in stock-based compensation for the year ended
September 30, 2011 is $35.1 million of expense related
to awards that will be made as part of the fiscal 2011 annual
bonus plan to employees which is included in accrued expenses at
September 30, 2011. The annual bonus pool is determined by
management and approved by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors based on financial performance targets
approved at the beginning of the year. If these targets are
achieved, the awards will be settled in shares based on the
total bonus earned and the grant date fair value of the shares
awarded to each employee.
Stock
Options
We have share-based award plans under which employees, officers
and directors may be granted stock options to purchase our
common stock, generally at fair market value. During fiscal
2009, 2010, and 2011, stock options have been primarily granted
to senior management and officers of the Company. Our plans do
not allow for options to be granted at below fair market value,
nor can they be re-priced at any time. Options granted under
plans adopted by the Company become exercisable over various
periods, typically two to four years and have a maximum term of
ten years. We have also assumed options and option plans in
connection with certain of our acquisitions. These stock options
are governed by the plans and agreements that they were
originally issued under, but are now exercisable for shares of
our common stock.
94
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below summarizes activity relating to stock options
for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 1, 2008
|
|
|
14,996,514
|
|
|
$
|
7.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed from SNAPin
|
|
|
1,258,708
|
|
|
$
|
3.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,092,000
|
|
|
$
|
12.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,570,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(987,399
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(234,958
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
13,553,866
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
13.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,433,701
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(350,884
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(266,044
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
10,703,237
|
|
|
$
|
8.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,866,544
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(90,813
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(64,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2011
|
|
|
7,681,719
|
|
|
$
|
10.48
|
|
|
|
3.5 years
|
|
|
$
|
75.8 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2011
|
|
|
6,565,907
|
|
|
$
|
9.54
|
|
|
|
3.1 years
|
|
|
$
|
70.9 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
9,137,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
10,575,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based
on the positive difference, if any, between the closing market
value of our common stock on September 30, 2011 ($20.34)
and the exercise price of the underlying options. |
As of September 30, 2011, the total unamortized fair value
of stock options was $3.9 million with a weighted average
remaining recognition period of 1.0 year. A summary of
weighted-average grant-date (including assumed options) fair
value and intrinsic value of stock options exercised is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
6.13
|
|
|
$
|
5.90
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised (in millions)
|
|
$
|
53.0
|
|
|
$
|
36.1
|
|
|
$
|
21.0
|
|
95
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the
grant-date fair value of an award. The fair value of the stock
options granted and unvested options assumed from acquisitions
were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
46.1
|
%
|
|
|
50.9
|
%
|
|
|
55.1
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that we have
never paid cash dividends and have no present intention to pay
cash dividends. Expected volatility is based on the historical
volatility of our common stock over the period commensurate with
the expected life of the options and the historical implied
volatility from traded options with a term of 180 days or
greater. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the average
U.S. Treasury STRIPS rate during the period, which
approximates the rate in effect at the time of grant,
commensurate with the expected life of the instrument. We
estimate the expected term of options granted based on
historical exercise behavior.
Restricted
Awards
We are authorized to issue equity incentive awards in the form
of Restricted Awards, including Restricted Units and Restricted
Stock, which are individually discussed below. Unvested
Restricted Awards may not be sold, transferred or assigned. The
fair value of the Restricted Awards is measured based upon the
market price of the underlying common stock as of the date of
grant, reduced by the purchase price of $0.001 per share of the
awards. The Restricted Awards generally are subject to vesting
over a period of two to four years, and may have opportunities
for acceleration for achievement of defined goals. We also
issued certain Restricted Awards with vesting solely dependent
on the achievement of specified performance targets. The fair
value of the Restricted Awards is amortized to expense over the
awards applicable requisite service periods using the
straight-line method. In the event that the employees
employment with the Company terminates, or in the case of awards
with only performance goals, if those goals are not met, any
unvested shares are forfeited and revert to the Company.
96
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted Units are not included in issued and outstanding
common stock until the shares are vested and released. The table
below summarizes activity relating to Restricted Units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
Time-Based
|
|
|
|
Contingent Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 1, 2008
|
|
|
2,414,524
|
|
|
|
6,857,524
|
|
Assumed in acquisition of SNAPin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,446
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,292,617
|
|
|
|
5,392,361
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(291,450
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865,505
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(575,018
|
)
|
|
|
(928,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
2,840,673
|
|
|
|
8,755,330
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,698,743
|
|
|
|
4,693,440
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(950,253
|
)
|
|
|
(4,800,175
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(721,323
|
)
|
|
|
(853,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
2,867,840
|
|
|
|
7,795,114
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,779,905
|
|
|
|
5,167,589
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(1,312,136
|
)
|
|
|
(4,977,397
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(380,430
|
)
|
|
|
(699,188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2011
|
|
|
2,955,179
|
|
|
|
7,286,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of outstanding
Restricted Units
|
|
|
1.1 years
|
|
|
|
1.3 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding Restricted Units(1)
|
|
$
|
60.1 million
|
|
|
$
|
148.3 million
|
|
Restricted Units vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
2,364,056
|
|
|
|
6,510,953
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of Restricted Units
vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
1.1 years
|
|
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of Restricted Units vested and
expected to vest(1)
|
|
$
|
48.1 million
|
|
|
$
|
132.4 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based
on the positive difference between the closing market value of
our common stock on September 30, 2011 ($20.34) and the
exercise price of the underlying Restricted Units. |
The purchase price for vested Restricted Units is $0.001 per
share. As of September 30, 2011, unearned stock-based
compensation expense related to all unvested Restricted Units is
$124.7 million. Based on expectations of future performance
vesting criteria, where applicable, the expense will be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
A summary of weighted-average grant-date fair value, including
those assumed in respective periods, and intrinsic value of all
Restricted Units vested is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
18.74
|
|
|
$
|
13.15
|
|
|
$
|
11.39
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares vested (in millions)
|
|
$
|
116.0
|
|
|
$
|
91.3
|
|
|
$
|
33.3
|
|
97
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted Stock is included in the issued and outstanding
common stock in these financial statements at the date of grant.
There were no new grants of restricted stock in fiscal 2011,
2010 or 2009 and all shares were fully vested at
September 30, 2009. The table below summarizes activity
relating to Restricted Stock for fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 30, 2008
|
|
|
625,070
|
|
|
$
|
10.90
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(625,070
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price for vested Restricted Stock is $0.001 per
share. The total intrinsic value of the shares which vested in
fiscal 2009 was $8.65 million.
In order to satisfy our employees withholding tax
liability as a result of the vesting of Restricted Stock, we
have historically repurchased shares upon the employees
vesting. Similarly, in order to satisfy our employees
withholding tax liability as a result of the release of our
employees Restricted Units, including units released
related to acquisitions, we have historically cancelled a
portion of the common stock upon the release. In fiscal 2011, we
withheld payroll taxes totaling $36.7 million relating to
2.0 million shares of common stock that were repurchased or
cancelled. Based on our estimate of the Restricted Awards that
will vest or be released in fiscal 2012, and further assuming
that one-third of these Restricted Awards would be repurchased
or cancelled to satisfy the employees withholding tax
liability (such amount approximating the tax rate of our
employees), we would have an obligation to pay cash relating to
approximately 1.5 million shares during fiscal 2012.
1995
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Our 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan), as
amended and restated on January 29, 2010, authorizes the
issuance of a maximum of 10,000,000 shares of common stock
in semi-annual offerings to employees at a price equal to the
lower of 85% of the closing price on the applicable offering
commencement date or 85% of the closing price on the applicable
offering termination date. Stock-based compensation expense for
the employee stock purchase plan is recognized for the fair
value benefit accorded to participating employees. At
September 30, 2011, 3,701,294 shares were reserved for
future issuance. A summary of the weighted-average grant-date
fair value, shares issued and total stock-based compensation
expense recognized related to the Plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
4.63
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
Total shares issued (in millions)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense (in millions)
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
The fair value of the purchase rights granted under this plan
was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model that uses the following weighted-average
assumptions, which were derived in a manner similar to those
discussed above relative to stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
35.7
|
%
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
98
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
We have various operating leases for office space around the
world. In connection with many of our acquisitions, we assumed
facility lease obligations. Among these assumed obligations are
lease payments related to office locations that were vacated by
certain of the acquired companies prior to the acquisition date
(Note 13). Additionally, certain of our lease obligations
have been included in various restructuring charges
(Note 14). The following table outlines our gross future
minimum payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of
September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Leases Under
|
|
|
Other Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Obligations Assumed
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
26,521
|
|
|
$
|
1,313
|
|
|
$
|
12,484
|
|
|
$
|
40,318
|
|
2013
|
|
|
23,930
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
2014
|
|
|
19,813
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
2,499
|
|
|
|
22,364
|
|
2015
|
|
|
17,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,502
|
|
|
|
20,057
|
|
2016
|
|
|
16,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
17,386
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
25,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
129,489
|
|
|
$
|
1,606
|
|
|
$
|
21,018
|
|
|
$
|
152,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2011, we have subleased certain office
space that is included in the above table to third parties.
Total sublease income under contractual terms is
$8.5 million and ranges from approximately
$1.5 million to $3.2 million on an annual basis
through February 2016.
Total rent expense charged to operations was approximately
$23.5 million, $20.5 million and $19.6 million
for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Litigation
and Other Claims
Like many companies in the software industry, we have, from time
to time, been notified of claims that we may be infringing, or
contributing to the infringement of, the intellectual property
rights of others. These claims have been referred to counsel,
and they are in various stages of evaluation and negotiation. If
it appears necessary or desirable, we may seek licenses for
these intellectual property rights. There is no assurance that
licenses will be offered by all claimants, that the terms of any
offered licenses will be acceptable to us or that in all cases
the dispute will be resolved without litigation, which may be
time consuming and expensive, and may result in injunctive
relief or the payment of damages by us.
We do not believe that the final outcome of the above litigation
matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial
position and results of operations. However, even if our defense
is successful, the litigation could require significant
management time and will be costly. Should we not prevail, our
operating results, financial position and cash flows could be
adversely impacted.
Guarantees
and Other
We include indemnification provisions in the contracts we enter
into with customers and business partners. Generally, these
provisions require us to defend claims arising out of our
products infringement of third-party intellectual property
rights, breach of contractual obligations
and/or
unlawful or otherwise culpable conduct. The indemnity
obligations generally cover damages, costs and attorneys
fees arising out of such claims. In most, but not all cases, our
total liability under such provisions is limited to either the
value of the contract or a specified, agreed upon amount. In
some cases our total liability under such provisions is
unlimited. In many, but not all, cases, the term of the
indemnity provision is perpetual. While the maximum potential
amount of future payments we could be
99
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
required to make under all the indemnification provisions is
unlimited, we believe the estimated fair value of these
provisions is minimal due to the low frequency with which these
provisions have been triggered.
We indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent
permitted by law. These agreements, among other things,
indemnify directors and officers for expenses, judgments, fines,
penalties and settlement amounts incurred by such persons in
their capacity as a director or officer of the company,
regardless of whether the individual is serving in any such
capacity at the time the liability or expense is incurred.
Additionally, in connection with certain acquisitions we have
agreed to indemnify the former officers and members of the
boards of directors of those companies, on similar terms as
described above, for a period of six years from the acquisition
date. In certain cases we purchase director and officer
insurance policies related to these obligations, which fully
cover the six year periods. To the extent that we do not
purchase a director and officer insurance policy for the full
period of any contractual indemnification, we would be required
to pay for costs incurred, if any, as described above.
|
|
19.
|
Pension
and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
|
Defined
Contribution Plan
We have established a retirement savings plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the
401(k) Plan). The 401(k) Plan covers substantially
all of our U.S. employees who meet minimum age and service
requirements, and allows participants to defer a portion of
their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis. Effective
July 1, 2003, Company match of employees
contributions was established. We match 50% of employee
contributions up to 4% of eligible salary. Employees who were
hired prior to April 1, 2004 were 100% vested into the plan
as soon as they started to contribute to the plan. Employees
hired on or after April 1, 2004, vest one-third of the
contribution annually over a three-year period. Our
contributions to the 401(k) Plan totaled $3.6 million,
$3.3 million and $3.2 million for fiscal 2011, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
In accordance with the provisions set forth in ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, we
recognized the funded status, which is the difference between
the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit
obligations, of our postretirement benefit plans in the
consolidated balance sheets with a corresponding adjustment to
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. These
amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will be
subsequently recognized as net periodic pension expense.
We assumed the assets and obligations related to certain
significant defined benefit pension plans in connection with our
acquisition of Dictaphone, which provide certain retirement and
death benefits for former Dictaphone employees located in the
United Kingdom and Canada. These two pension plans are closed to
new participants.
In connection with our acquisition of SVOX in June 2011, we
assumed an additional defined benefit pension plan for employees
in Switzerland. At the end of September, 2011, the plan benefit
obligations exceed the plan assets by approximately
$1.9 million. The plan requires periodic cash
contributions, including participant contributions from active
employees. Company contributions in fiscal 2012 are expected to
be $0.5 million.
100
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table shows the changes in fiscal 2011 and 2010 in
the projected benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status
of the defined benefit pension plans (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change in Benefit Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
25,067
|
|
|
$
|
22,850
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
11,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,343
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Curtailment gain
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain)loss
|
|
|
(3,944
|
)
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,238
|
)
|
|
|
(991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
|
31,577
|
|
|
|
25,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of period
|
|
|
19,750
|
|
|
|
17,549
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
9,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
Employee contributions
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(669
|
)
|
|
|
155
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,238
|
)
|
|
|
(991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of period
|
|
|
28,253
|
|
|
|
19,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of period
|
|
$
|
(3,324
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts recognized in our consolidated balance sheets
consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(3,431
|
)
|
|
|
(5,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability recognized
|
|
$
|
(3,324
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
as of September 30, 2011 consisted of the following
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Actuarial loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
2,602
|
|
The following represents the amounts included in accumulated
other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2011 that we expect to recognize in earnings
during fiscal 2012 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Expense
|
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
101
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Included in the table below are the amounts relating to our UK
and Swiss pension plans, which have accumulated benefit
obligations and projected benefit obligations in excess of plan
assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Aggregate projected benefit obligations
|
|
$
|
28,525
|
|
|
$
|
21,939
|
|
Aggregate accumulated benefit obligations
|
|
|
28,017
|
|
|
|
21,939
|
|
Aggregate fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
25,094
|
|
|
|
16,117
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost of the pension plans
were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,343
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,212
|
)
|
|
|
(1,038
|
)
|
Curtailment gain
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized loss
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
Assumptions:
Weighted-average assumptions used in developing the net periodic
benefit cost for the pension plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Average compensation increase
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
(1)
|
Expected rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate of compensation increase is not applicable as there were no
active members in the 2010 plans. |
The weighted average discount rate used in developing the
benefit obligations was 4.4% and 5.0% at September 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively.
Asset
Allocation and Investment Strategy:
The percentages of the fair value of pension plan assets
actually allocated and targeted for allocation, by asset
category, at September 30, 2011 and September 30,
2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
Real estate and other
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plan administrators recently updated the asset allocation
targets to reflect changes in the participant population and the
expected period that future benefits will become payable. The
investments held by the plans will
102
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
be rebalanced during the next fiscal year to reflect this
updated target allocation. The weighted average expected
long-term rate of return for the plan assets is 5.5%. The
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is determined
based on a variety of considerations, including established
asset allocation targets and expectations for those asset
classes, historical returns of the plans assets and other
market considerations. We invest our pension assets with the
objective of achieving a total rate of return, over the long
term, sufficient to fund future pension obligations and to
minimize future pension contribution requirements. All of the
assets are invested in funds offered to institutional investors
that are similar to mutual funds in that they provide
diversification by holding various debt and equity securities.
The fair value of total pension plan assets by major category at
September 30, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
11,720
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
14,576
|
|
Real estate and other
|
|
|
1,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension assets
|
|
|
28,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets are all invested in funds which are not quoted on any
active market and are valued based on the underlying debt and
equity investments and their individual prices at any given
time, and thus are classified as Level 2 within the fair
value hierarchy as defined in ASC 820 and described in
Note 12.
Employer
Contributions:
We expect to contribute $1.8 million to our pension plans
in fiscal 2012. Included in this contribution is a minimum
funding requirement associated with our UK pension which
requires an annual minimum payment of £859,900
(approximately $1.3 million based on the exchange rate at
September 30, 2011) for each year through fiscal 2014.
Estimated
Future Benefit Payments:
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
2,544
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
2015
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
2016
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
6,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of income (loss) before income taxes are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
10,197
|
|
|
$
|
(15,543
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,549
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
19,820
|
|
|
|
14,478
|
|
|
|
22,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
30,017
|
|
|
$
|
(1,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the (benefit) provision for income taxes are
as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
11,846
|
|
|
$
|
(1,634
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
State
|
|
|
6,810
|
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
17,013
|
|
|
|
13,442
|
|
|
|
8,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,669
|
|
|
|
14,292
|
|
|
|
14,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(37,453
|
)
|
|
|
7,052
|
|
|
|
14,952
|
|
State
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
12,740
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(6,194
|
)
|
|
|
(4,252
|
)
|
|
|
(1,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,890
|
)
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(8,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,034
|
|
|
$
|
40,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(27.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,693.3
|
)%
|
|
|
192.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The benefit (provision) for income taxes differed from the
amount computed by applying the federal statutory rate to our
income (loss) before income taxes as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Federal tax provision (benefit) at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
10,506
|
|
|
$
|
(373
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,351
|
|
State tax, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
|
|
3,059
|
|
|
|
7,137
|
|
State tax law enactment, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,241
|
|
Foreign tax rate and other foreign related tax items
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
(2,274
|
)
|
|
|
(1,748
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
6,459
|
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
4,919
|
|
Non-deductible expenditures
|
|
|
10,965
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
2,487
|
|
Change in U.S. and foreign valuation allowance
|
|
|
(44,792
|
)
|
|
|
10,217
|
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
Executive compensation
|
|
|
3,946
|
|
|
|
4,063
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,318
|
)
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(8,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,034
|
|
|
$
|
40,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in fiscal 2011 benefit for income taxes is a decrease
in the valuation allowance of $34.7 million related to a
one-time tax benefit recorded in connection with the Equitrac
acquisition for which a net deferred tax liability was recorded
in purchase accounting. This released our valuation allowance
resulting in the recognition of a tax benefit during fiscal
2011. Additionally, we have released a $10.6 million
valuation allowance associated with
104
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
a previously acquired intangible asset which has been changed
from an indefinite life asset to a finite life asset during
fiscal 2011.
Included in fiscal 2010 provision for income taxes is an
increase in the valuation allowance of $7.0 million related
to the unbenefited losses in the U.K. subsequent to the December
2009 acquisition of SpinVox. Additionally, tax benefits were
recorded for the favorable settlements of a $1.1 million
U.S. federal tax audit contingency related to our acquisition of
eCopy and a $1.0 million state tax penalty contingency
related to our acquisition of eScription. We also recorded a
$1.1 million U.S. federal tax benefit related to
certain tax loss carrybacks resulting from a tax law change and
a $1.1 million tax benefit resulting from certain
international research and development credits.
The cumulative amount of undistributed earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries amounted to $96.1 million at
September 30, 2011. We have not provided any additional
federal or state income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on
the undistributed earnings, as such earnings have been
indefinitely reinvested in the business. An estimate of the tax
consequences from the repatriation of these earnings is not
practicable at this time resulting from the complexities of the
utilization of foreign tax credits and other tax assets.
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following at
September 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
258,179
|
|
|
$
|
268,882
|
|
Federal and state credit carryforwards
|
|
|
10,727
|
|
|
|
22,768
|
|
Capitalized research and development costs
|
|
|
22,910
|
|
|
|
23,673
|
|
Accrued expenses and other reserves
|
|
|
48,882
|
|
|
|
55,385
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
38,294
|
|
|
|
25,090
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
35,968
|
|
|
|
18,952
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,365
|
|
|
|
6,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
421,325
|
|
|
|
420,955
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(274,807
|
)
|
|
|
(297,513
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
146,518
|
|
|
|
123,442
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(11,610
|
)
|
|
|
(1,900
|
)
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
(12,000
|
)
|
|
|
(12,120
|
)
|
Acquired intangibles
|
|
|
(189,138
|
)
|
|
|
(170,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(66,230
|
)
|
|
$
|
(60,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets(a)
|
|
$
|
5,999
|
|
|
$
|
3,131
|
|
Long-term deferred tax liability(b)
|
|
|
(72,229
|
)
|
|
|
(63,731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(66,230
|
)
|
|
$
|
(60,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(b) |
|
Included in deferred tax liability in the consolidated balance
sheets. |
As of September 30, 2011, our valuation allowance for
U.S. net deferred tax assets totaled $164.8 million,
which consists of $186.2 million in beginning allowance,
plus an increase of $23.4 million to the valuation
allowance due to increases in deferred tax assets during fiscal
2011 and a net decrease to the valuation allowance of
$44.8 million as a result of increase in the deferred tax
liabilities as the company acquired intangibles through
105
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
various acquisitions and the release of $10.6 million
valuation allowance associated with a previously acquired
intangible asset which has been changed from an indefinite life
asset to a finite life asset during fiscal 2011. As of
September 30, 2011, our valuation allowance for foreign
deferred tax assets totaled $110.0 million, which consists
of $111.3 million in beginning allowance and a
$1.3 million decrease due to decreases in net deferred tax
assets in fiscal 2011.
At September 30, 2011 and 2010, we had U.S. federal
net operating loss carryforwards of $499.6 million and
$579.1 million, respectively, of which $148.0 million
and $210.0 million, respectively, relate to tax deductions
from stock-based compensation which will be recorded as
additional
paid-in-capital
when realized. At September 30, 2011 and 2010, we had state
net operating loss carryforwards of $191.6 million and
$203.5 million, respectively. The net operating loss and
credit carryforwards are subject to an annual limitation due to
the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state tax provisions. At
September 30, 2011 and 2010, we had foreign net operating
loss carryforwards of $447.0 million and
$427.0 million, respectively. These carryforwards will
expire at various dates beginning in 2012 and extending through
2029, if not utilized.
At September 30, 2011 and 2010, we had federal research and
development carryforwards of $17.7 million and
$15.2 million, respectively. At September 30, 2011 and
2010, we had state research and development credit carryforwards
of $6.4 million and $5.9 million, respectively.
Uncertain
Tax Positions
In accordance with the provisions of
ASC 740-10,
Income Taxes, we establish reserves for tax uncertainties
that reflect the use of the comprehensive model for the
recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions. Under
the comprehensive model, reserves are established when we have
determined that it is more likely than not that a tax position
will or will not be sustained and at the greatest amount for
which the result is more likely than not.
The aggregate changes in the balance of our gross unrecognized
tax benefits were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
12,819
|
|
|
$
|
12,148
|
|
Increases for tax positions taken during current period
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
Increases for interest and penalty charges
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
Increases for acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
Decreases for tax settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,458
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at end of year
|
|
$
|
14,935
|
|
|
$
|
12,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011, $14.9 million of the
unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would impact our
effective tax rate.
We do not expect a significant change in the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months. We
recognized interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions in our provision for income taxes and had accrued
$2.5 million of such interest and penalties as of
September 30, 2011.
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax, various state
and local taxes, and international income taxes in numerous
jurisdictions. The federal, state and foreign tax returns are
generally subject to tax examinations for the tax years ended in
2007 through 2011.
106
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Convertible
Debt Issuance and Share Repurchase
On October 24, 2011, we sold $690 million of
2.75% Convertible Debentures due November 1, 2031 (the
2031 Debentures) in a private placement pursuant to
Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Total
proceeds, net of debt issuance costs of approximately
$14.0 million, were $676.0 million. The 2031
Debentures bear interest at 2.75% per year, payable in cash
semiannually.
ASC 470-20,
Debt with Conversion and Other Options, requires us to
allocate the proceeds to the liability component based on the
fair value determined at the issuance date. We estimate that
approximately $534 million will be allocated to long-term
debt, and $156 million will be recorded as additional
paid-in capital.
We used $200 million of the proceeds received from the 2031
Debentures to repurchase 8,514,120 shares of our common
stock on October 24, 2011. The additional proceeds will be
used for potential acquisitions and other strategic
transactions, and general corporate purposes including working
capital and capital expenditures.
Acquisition
On October 6, 2011, we acquired Swype, Inc., a provider of
software that allows users to type by sliding a finger or stylus
from letter to letter, for approximately $77.5 million in
cash, plus $25.0 million in contingent payments, due in
eighteen months subject to certain conditions.
|
|
22.
|
Segment
and Geographic Information and Significant Customers
|
We follow the provisions of ASC 280, Segment
Reporting, which established standards for reporting
information about operating segments. ASC 280 also
established standards for disclosures about products, services
and geographic areas. Operating segments are defined as
components of an enterprise for which separate financial
information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief
operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources
and in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker
(CODM) is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
Prior to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company operated
in one reportable segment as the CODM regularly reviewed revenue
data by market group, while reviewing gross margins, operating
margins, and other measures of income or loss on a consolidated
basis to manage the business, allocate resources and assess
performance.
Effective in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, our CODM
commenced regular reviews of the operating results including
measures of profitability of each of our market groups;
Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer, Enterprise and Imaging. As a
result, we have changed our segment structure and identified our
four customer-facing market groups as reportable segments as
defined by
ASC 280-50-1
based on the level of financial information now regularly
reviewed by the CODM in allocating resources and assessing
performance of each market group. The change in our reportable
segments does not have any impact on our consolidated balance
sheets, statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows.
The Healthcare segment is primarily engaged in voice and
language recognition for healthcare information management
offered both by licensing and on-demand. The Mobile and Consumer
segment is primarily engaged in sales of voice and language
solutions that are embedded in a device (such as a cell phone,
car or tablet computer) or installed on a personal computer. Our
Enterprise segment offers voice and language solutions by
licensing as well as on-demand solutions hosted by us that are
designed to help companies better support, understand and
communicate with their customers. The Imaging segment sells
document capture and print management solutions that are
embedded in copiers and multi-function printers as well as
packaged software for document management.
Segment profit is an important measure used for evaluating
performance and for decision-making purposes. Segment profit
represents income from operations excluding stock-based
compensation, amortization of intangible
107
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
assets, acquisition related costs, net, restructuring and other
charges, net, costs associated with intellectual property
collaboration agreements, other income (expense), net and
certain unallocated corporate expenses. Segment profit includes
an adjustment for acquisition-related revenue and cost of
revenue which includes revenue from acquisitions that would have
otherwise been recognized but for the purchase accounting
treatment of these transactions. We believe that these
adjustments allow for more complete comparisons to the financial
results of the historical operations.
We do not track our assets by operating segment. Consequently,
it is not practical to show assets by operating segment nor
depreciation by operating segment. The following table presents
segment results along with a reconciliation of segment profit to
income (loss) before income taxes (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Segment revenues(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
526,804
|
|
|
$
|
449,270
|
|
|
$
|
392,038
|
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
393,343
|
|
|
|
309,480
|
|
|
|
234,137.
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
296,373
|
|
|
|
296,170
|
|
|
|
310,558
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
177,418
|
|
|
|
140,750
|
|
|
|
73,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues
|
|
|
1,393,938
|
|
|
|
1,195,670
|
|
|
|
1,010,312
|
|
Acquisition related revenue
|
|
|
(75,197
|
)
|
|
|
(76,722
|
)
|
|
|
(59,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated revenue
|
|
|
1,318,741
|
|
|
|
1,118,948
|
|
|
|
950,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit(b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
|
269,357
|
|
|
|
227,417
|
|
|
|
184,843
|
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
170,918
|
|
|
|
120,022
|
|
|
|
107,983
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
63,276
|
|
|
|
82,266
|
|
|
|
89,570
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
69,116
|
|
|
|
55,641
|
|
|
|
29,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment profit
|
|
|
572,667
|
|
|
|
485,346
|
|
|
|
412,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses and other, net
|
|
|
(100,288
|
)
|
|
|
(88,035
|
)
|
|
|
(88,219
|
)
|
Acquisition-related revenues and costs of revenue adjustment
|
|
|
(64,724
|
)
|
|
|
(63,447
|
)
|
|
|
(58,415
|
)
|
Non-cash stock based compensation
|
|
|
(147,296
|
)
|
|
|
(100,139
|
)
|
|
|
(71,407
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
(143,330
|
)
|
|
|
(135,577
|
)
|
|
|
(115,368
|
)
|
Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
(21,866
|
)
|
|
|
(30,611
|
)
|
|
|
(15,703
|
)
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
(22,862
|
)
|
|
|
(17,891
|
)
|
|
|
(5,520
|
)
|
Costs associated with IP collaboration agreements
|
|
|
(19,750
|
)
|
|
|
(16,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(22,534
|
)
|
|
|
(33,982
|
)
|
|
|
(36,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
30,017
|
|
|
$
|
(1,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Segment revenues differ from reported revenues due to certain
revenue adjustments related to acquisitions that would otherwise
have been recognized but for the purchase accounting treatment
of the business combinations. Segment revenues also include
revenue that the business would have otherwise recognized had we
not acquired intellectual property and other assets from the
same customer. These revenues are included to allow for more
complete comparisons to the financial results of historical
operations and in evaluating management performance. |
108
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Segment profit reflects the direct controllable costs of each
segment together with an allocation of sales and corporate
marketing expenses, and certain research and development project
costs that benefit multiple product offerings. The costs of
acquisition related revenue adjustments are included to allow
for more complete comparisons of the historical operations. |
No country outside of the United States provided greater than
10% of our total revenue. Revenue, classified by the major
geographic areas in which our customers are located, was as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
963,688
|
|
|
$
|
802,049
|
|
|
$
|
706,858
|
|
International
|
|
|
355,053
|
|
|
|
316,899
|
|
|
|
243,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,318,741
|
|
|
$
|
1,118,948
|
|
|
$
|
950,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States held greater than 10% of
our long-lived or total assets. Our long-lived assets, including
intangible assets and goodwill, were located as follows (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,431,038
|
|
|
$
|
2,479,952
|
|
International
|
|
|
809,328
|
|
|
|
448,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,240,366
|
|
|
$
|
2,928,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.
|
Quarterly
Data (Unaudited)
|
The following information has been derived from unaudited
consolidated financial statements that, in the opinion of
management, include all recurring adjustments necessary for a
fair statement of such information (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
303,829
|
|
|
$
|
318,962
|
|
|
$
|
328,909
|
|
|
$
|
367,041
|
|
|
$
|
1,318,741
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
186,907
|
|
|
$
|
193,789
|
|
|
$
|
207,865
|
|
|
$
|
230,356
|
|
|
$
|
818,917
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,735
|
|
|
$
|
41,621
|
|
|
$
|
(5,109
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,238
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
298,633
|
|
|
|
300,937
|
|
|
|
303,100
|
|
|
|
306,541
|
|
|
|
302,277
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
298,633
|
|
|
|
314,756
|
|
|
|
317,802
|
|
|
|
306,541
|
|
|
|
315,960
|
|
109
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
262,977
|
|
|
$
|
273,005
|
|
|
$
|
273,203
|
|
|
$
|
309,763
|
|
|
$
|
1,118,948
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
169,382
|
|
|
$
|
169,405
|
|
|
$
|
171,425
|
|
|
$
|
199,366
|
|
|
$
|
709,578
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,278
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,105
|
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
279,068
|
|
|
|
284,994
|
|
|
|
291,610
|
|
|
|
293,971
|
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
279,068
|
|
|
|
284,994
|
|
|
|
291,610
|
|
|
|
307,382
|
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
110
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed (i) to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed and summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and
(ii) to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2011, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management
Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external reporting purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of our assets;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and directors;
and,
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011,
utilizing the criteria set forth in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on the results of this assessment,
management (including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer) has concluded that, as of September 30,
2011, our internal control over financial reporting was
effective.
The attestation report concerning the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2011 issued by BDO USA, LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, appears in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
111
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
since we intend to file our definitive Proxy Statement for our
next Annual Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Proxy Statement), within 120 days
of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, and
certain information to be included in the Proxy Statement is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this item concerning our directors
is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
section titled Election of Directors in our Proxy
Statement. Information required by this item concerning our
executive officers is incorporated by reference to the
information set forth in the section entitled Executive
Compensation, Management and Other Information in our
Proxy Statement. Information regarding Section 16 reporting
compliance is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth in the section entitled Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in our Proxy
Statement.
Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics for all of our directors, officers and employees on
February 24, 2004. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
can be found at our website: www.nuance.com. We will provide to
any person without charge, upon request, a copy of our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics. Such a request should be made in
writing and addressed to Investor Relations, Nuance
Communications, Inc., 1 Wayside Road, Burlington, MA 01803.
To date, there have been no waivers under our Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics. We will post any waivers, if and when
granted, of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our
website at www.nuance.com.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item regarding executive
compensation is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth in the section titled Executive Compensation,
Management and Other Information in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholders Matters
|
The information required by this item regarding security
ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
sections titled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management and Equity Compensation
Plans in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
It is the policy of the Board that all transactions required to
be reported pursuant to Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
be subject to approval by the Audit Committee of the Board. In
furtherance of relevant NASDAQ rules and our commitment to
corporate governance, the charter of the Audit Committee
provides that the Audit Committee shall review and approve any
proposed related party transactions including, transactions
required to be reported pursuant to Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
for potential conflict of interest situations. The Audit
Committee reviews the material facts of all transactions that
require the committees approval and either approves or
disapproves of the transaction. In determining whether to
approve a transaction, the Audit Committee will take into
account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the
transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally
available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or
similar circumstances.
112
The additional information required by this item regarding
certain relationships and related party transactions is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
sections titled Related Party Transactions and
Director Independence in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this section is incorporated by
reference from the information in the section entitled
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors
in our Proxy Statement.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
Report:
(1) Financial Statements See Index to Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this Report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules All schedules
have been omitted as the requested information is inapplicable
or the information is presented in the financial statements or
related notes included as part of this Report.
(3) Exhibits See Item 15(b) of this Report
below.
(b) Exhibits.
113
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Paul A. Ricci
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Paul A. Ricci
Paul
A. Ricci, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Thomas L. Beaudoin
Thomas
L. Beaudoin, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Daniel D. Tempesta
Daniel
D. Tempesta, Chief Accounting Officer and
Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Frankenberg
Robert
J. Frankenberg, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Patrick T. Hackett
Patrick
T. Hackett, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ William H. Janeway
William
H. Janeway, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Mark R. Laret
Mark
R. Laret, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Katharine A. Martin
Katharine
A. Martin, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Mark Myers
Mark
Myers, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Philip Quigley
Philip
Quigley, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011
|
|
/s/ Robert G. Teresi
Robert
G. Teresi, Director
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement for the acquisition of the entire issued share capital
of SpinVox Limited, the substitution of Foxtrot Acquisition
Limited as the issuer of a debt instrument issued by SpinVox
Limited, and the release and cancellation of such debt
instrument in consideration of shares in Foxtrot Acquisition
Limited dated December 29, 2009
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Agreement for the acquisition of shares in Foxtrot Acquisition
Limited and the payment of certain sums to the Mezzanine Lenders
and other parties dated December 29, 2009
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.2
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2011, by and
among Nuance, Ruetli Holding Corporation, the shareholders of
SVOX and smac partners GmbH, as the shareholder representative.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
8/9/2011
|
|
|
|
2
|
.4
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 10, 2011, by
and among Nuance, Ellipse Acquisition Corporation, Equitrac
Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow agent,
and Cornerstone Equity Investors, LLC, as the stockholder
representative.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.2
|
|
8/9/2011
|
|
|
|
2
|
.5
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Nuance Communications,
Inc., SpeakEasy Acquisition Corporation, SpeakEasy Acquisition
LLC, SNAPin Software, Inc., Thomas S. Huseby as Stockholder
Representative and U.S. Bank National Association, as Escrow
Agent, dated as of August 13, 2008.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
10/3/2008
|
|
|
|
2
|
.6
|
|
Amendment effective as of September 24, 2008, by and among
Nuance Communications, Inc., SpeakEasy Acquisition Corporation,
SpeakEasy Acquisition LLC, SNAPin Software, Inc., Thomas S.
Huseby as Stockholder Representative and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Escrow Agent.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.2
|
|
10/3/2008
|
|
|
|
2
|
.7
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated August 12, 2011 by and
between Nuance Communications, Inc. and Telecom Italia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
2
|
.8
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 6, 2011,
by and among Nuance Communications, Inc., Sonic Acquisition
Corporation, Swype, Inc., and Adrian Smith, as shareholder
representative.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
10/7/2011
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.2
|
|
5/11/2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
10/19/2005
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
11/13/2007
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended.
|
|
S-3
|
|
333-142182
|
|
3.3
|
|
4/18/2007
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
8-A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
12/6/1995
|
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrants, dated March 15, 2004,
issued to Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg
Pincus Netherlands Private Equity VIII I C.V., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII II C.V., and Warburg Pincus
Germany Private Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.3
|
|
5/10/2004
|
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrants, dated May 9, 2005, issued
to Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII I C.V., and Warburg Pincus
Germany Private Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
S-4
|
|
333-125496
|
|
4.11
|
|
6/3/2005
|
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Indenture, dated as of August 13, 2007, between Nuance
Communications, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee (including form of 2.75% Convertible Subordinated
Debentures due 2027).
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
8/17/2007
|
|
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2008 by and among
Nuance Communications, Inc. and the Purchasers identified on
Exhibit A (Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P.,
Warburg Pincus Netherlands Private Equity VIII, C.V.I., WP-WP
VIII Investors, L.P.).
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.2
|
|
4/11/2008
|
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 13, 2009, by and
among Nuance Communications, Inc. and the Purchasers identified
on Exhibit A (Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P. and
Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P.).
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
1/16/2009
|
|
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of
January 29, 2009, by and among Nuance Communications, Inc.,
Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII C.V. I, and WP-WPVIII
Investors, L.P., Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P. and
Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
2/9/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Indenture, dated as of October 24, 2011, by and between
Nuance Communications, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
10/24/2011
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
10.1
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement Number 1, dated as of
August 21, 2000, by and between the Registrant and Paul A.
Ricci.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-49656
|
|
4.3
|
|
11/9/2000
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Caere Corporation 1992 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-33464
|
|
10.4
|
|
3/29/2000
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended.*
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-100647
|
|
10.17
|
|
10/21/2002
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated on
April 27, 2000.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
Annex D
|
|
4/13/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Amended and Restated 1995 Directors Stock Option
Plan, as amended.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
3/17/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
1997 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended.*
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-100647
|
|
10.19
|
|
10/21/2002
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-74343
|
|
99.1
|
|
3/12/1999
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
3/17/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
2000 NonStatutory Stock Option Plan, as amended.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
4.1
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
ScanSoft 2003 Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
4.3
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.1
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.2
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 1998 Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.3
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 1994 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.4
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement.*
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.17
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Purchase Agreement.*
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.18
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement.*
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.19
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
2005 Severance Benefit Plan for Executive Officers.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Officer Short-term Disability Plan.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Technology Transfer and License Agreement, dated as of
January 30, 2003, between Koninklijke Philips Electronics
N.V. and the Registrant.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-100647
|
|
10.30
|
|
2/7/2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Letter, dated May 23, 2004, from the Registrant to Steven
Chambers regarding certain employment matters.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Increase Joinder, dated as of August 24, 2007, by and among
Nuance Communications, Inc. and the other parties identified
therein, to the Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit
Facility dated as of April 5, 2007.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/30/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Plan.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
1/12/2011
|
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Letter, dated June 3, 2008, from the Registrant to Thomas
L. Beaudoin regarding certain employment matters.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.39
|
|
12/1/2008
|
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of
December 29, 2008, by and between Nuance Communications,
Inc. and Paul Ricci.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
2/9/2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Amended and Restated Stock Plan.*
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
99.1
|
|
2/5/2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of
June 23, 2009, by and between Nuance Communications, Inc.
and Paul Ricci.*
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
99.1
|
|
6/26/2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Letter, dated March 29, 2010, to Janet Dillione regarding
certain employment matters.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/9/2010
|
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Letter, dated September 9, 2010, to Bruce Bowden regarding
certain employment matters.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
2/9/2011
|
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Plan, as amended.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
2/9/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Amendment Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2011, among Nuance
Communications, the Lenders party thereto, UBS AG, Stamford
Branch, as administrative agent and as collateral agent,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as sole lead arranger and sole
book runner and the other parties thereto from time to time to
the Credit Agreement.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
7/7/2011
|
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 7,
2011 among Nuance, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative
agent, Citicorp North America, Inc., as syndication agent,
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as documentation agent,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, as joint
lead arrangers, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Banc Of
America Securities LLC as co-arrangers, and Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., UBS Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC as joint bookrunners.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
02-7308
|
|
10.2
|
|
7/7/2011
|
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Letter dated March 14, 2011 to Bill Nelson regarding
certain employment matters.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
02-7308
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/9/2011
|
|
|
|
14
|
.1
|
|
Registrants Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
14.1
|
|
3/15/2004
|
|
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of BDO USA, LLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney. (See Signature Page).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
101
|
|
|
The following materials from Nuance Communications, Inc.s
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, formatted in
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the
Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss,
(iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and
(v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes management compensatory plan or arrangement |