e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30,
2011
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number 0-27038
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
94-3156479
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1 Wayside Road
Burlington, Massachusetts
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
01803
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(781) 565-5000
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the Registrants Common Stock,
outstanding as of July 31, 2011, was 305,586,374.
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
$
|
152,745
|
|
|
$
|
108,840
|
|
|
$
|
428,181
|
|
|
$
|
335,228
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
125,347
|
|
|
|
117,875
|
|
|
|
377,078
|
|
|
|
337,798
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
50,817
|
|
|
|
46,488
|
|
|
|
146,441
|
|
|
|
136,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
328,909
|
|
|
|
273,203
|
|
|
|
951,700
|
|
|
|
809,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
15,820
|
|
|
|
10,901
|
|
|
|
47,950
|
|
|
|
34,194
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
83,301
|
|
|
|
71,353
|
|
|
|
248,003
|
|
|
|
206,349
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
8,836
|
|
|
|
7,631
|
|
|
|
26,645
|
|
|
|
23,335
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
13,087
|
|
|
|
11,893
|
|
|
|
40,541
|
|
|
|
35,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
121,044
|
|
|
|
101,778
|
|
|
|
363,139
|
|
|
|
298,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
207,865
|
|
|
|
171,425
|
|
|
|
588,561
|
|
|
|
510,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
42,245
|
|
|
|
38,916
|
|
|
|
129,898
|
|
|
|
113,797
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
73,336
|
|
|
|
67,219
|
|
|
|
225,817
|
|
|
|
196,680
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
35,901
|
|
|
|
29,887
|
|
|
|
104,271
|
|
|
|
88,643
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
20,972
|
|
|
|
21,459
|
|
|
|
65,221
|
|
|
|
65,786
|
|
Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
8,595
|
|
|
|
6,125
|
|
|
|
13,910
|
|
|
|
26,892
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
|
|
5,343
|
|
|
|
16,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
181,913
|
|
|
|
166,863
|
|
|
|
544,460
|
|
|
|
508,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
25,952
|
|
|
|
4,562
|
|
|
|
44,101
|
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
2,213
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8,749
|
)
|
|
|
(9,971
|
)
|
|
|
(26,814
|
)
|
|
|
(30,380
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
5,539
|
|
|
|
8,865
|
|
|
|
10,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
18,231
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
28,365
|
|
|
|
(16,745
|
)
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(23,390
|
)
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
(14,982
|
)
|
|
|
4,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
41,621
|
|
|
$
|
(1,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,347
|
|
|
$
|
(21,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
303,100
|
|
|
|
291,610
|
|
|
|
300,846
|
|
|
|
285,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
317,802
|
|
|
|
291,610
|
|
|
|
314,791
|
|
|
|
285,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
446,981
|
|
|
$
|
516,630
|
|
Restricted cash (Note 9)
|
|
|
7,212
|
|
|
|
24,503
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
36,617
|
|
|
|
5,044
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of
$5,721 and $6,301
|
|
|
247,972
|
|
|
|
217,587
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
79,339
|
|
|
|
70,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
819,035
|
|
|
|
841,642
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
79,623
|
|
|
|
62,083
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,322
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,318,555
|
|
|
|
2,077,943
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
757,599
|
|
|
|
685,865
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
75,375
|
|
|
|
73,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,050,187
|
|
|
$
|
3,769,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
$
|
6,909
|
|
|
$
|
7,764
|
|
Contingent and deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
34,712
|
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
82,235
|
|
|
|
78,616
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
157,632
|
|
|
|
151,621
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
183,455
|
|
|
|
142,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
464,943
|
|
|
|
382,472
|
|
Long-term portion of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
852,444
|
|
|
|
851,014
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
81,502
|
|
|
|
76,598
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
73,966
|
|
|
|
63,731
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
114,548
|
|
|
|
98,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,587,403
|
|
|
|
1,472,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5 and 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock, $0.001 par value;
15,000 shares authorized; 3,562 shares issued and
outstanding (liquidation preference $4,631)
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 560,000 shares
authorized; 307,958 and 301,623 shares issued and 304,207
and 297,950 shares outstanding
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,681,024
|
|
|
|
2,581,901
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (3,751 and 3,673 shares)
|
|
|
(16,788
|
)
|
|
|
(16,788
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
31,617
|
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(238,008
|
)
|
|
|
(281,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,462,784
|
|
|
|
2,297,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,050,187
|
|
|
$
|
3,769,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
43,347
|
|
|
$
|
(21,204
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
125,719
|
|
|
|
116,738
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
109,505
|
|
|
|
72,868
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
9,524
|
|
|
|
9,746
|
|
Non-cash restructuring and other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
Deferred tax provision
|
|
|
(35,727
|
)
|
|
|
(2,321
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,679
|
)
|
|
|
(13,023
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(17,095
|
)
|
|
|
(4,869
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(9,999
|
)
|
|
|
(3,960
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(9,950
|
)
|
|
|
(7,825
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
43,603
|
|
|
|
30,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
259,507
|
|
|
|
184,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(24,267
|
)
|
|
|
(16,284
|
)
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(319,299
|
)
|
|
|
(155,882
|
)
|
Payments for acquired technology
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
(14,850
|
)
|
Payments for equity investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,970
|
)
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(10,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash balances
|
|
|
17,184
|
|
|
|
(22,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(331,223
|
)
|
|
|
(224,056
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
(5,864
|
)
|
|
|
(6,376
|
)
|
Payments of other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(7,794
|
)
|
|
|
(7,319
|
)
|
Proceeds on settlement of share-based derivatives, net
|
|
|
9,414
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
Excess tax benefits on employee equity awards
|
|
|
8,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from employee stock plans
|
|
|
21,712
|
|
|
|
22,832
|
|
Cash used to net share settle employee equity awards
|
|
|
(30,027
|
)
|
|
|
(18,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(4,339
|
)
|
|
|
9,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,406
|
|
|
|
(5,444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(69,649
|
)
|
|
|
(34,964
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
516,630
|
|
|
|
527,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
446,981
|
|
|
$
|
492,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Presentation
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Nuance Communications, Inc. (Nuance, we,
or the Company) and our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
We prepared these unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) for interim periods. In our
opinion, these financial statements reflect all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial position for the periods
disclosed. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Although we believe the disclosures in these financial
statements are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading, certain information normally included in the
footnotes prepared in accordance with GAAP has been omitted.
Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes
thereto included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Interim
results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for a full year.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
With the exception of the adoption of the accounting
pronouncements discussed below related to revenue recognition,
we have made no changes to the significant accounting policies
disclosed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. We have
updated our disclosures on collaboration agreements to reflect
activity in the current period.
Accounting
for collaboration agreements
In June 2011, we entered into an agreement with a large
healthcare provider to acquire certain data to be used in a
joint development project in exchange for $10 million, $3.5
million of which was due on June 30, 2011. In addition,
under the terms of the arrangement we will be reimbursed for
certain research and development costs related to specified
product development projects with the objective of
commercializing the resulting products. All intellectual
property derived from these research and development efforts
will be owned by us. Upon product introduction, we will pay
royalties to this party based on the actual sales. At the end of
5 years, the party can elect to continue with the
arrangement, receiving royalties on future sales, or receive a
buy-out payment from us and forego future royalties. The buy-out
payment is calculated based on a number of factors including the
net cash flows received and paid by the parties, as well as a
minimum return on those net cash flows.
As of the execution of the above arrangement, we have other
arrangements where we have sold and will continue to sell our
products and services to this party. As a result, under the
guidance of ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, we
are required to reduce the revenue recognized by the amount we
pay to this customer, up to our historical revenue recorded from
them. We have therefore reduced reported revenue by
$3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
The above development arrangement will be accounted for in
accordance with ASC 730, Research and
Development. Accordingly, any buy-out obligation will be
recorded as a liability and any reimbursement of the research
and development costs in excess of the buy-out obligation will
be recorded as an offset to research and development costs.
Royalties paid to this party upon commercialization of any
products from these development efforts will be recorded as a
reduction to revenue in accordance with ASC 605. During the
quarter ended June 30, 2011, $4.6 million of expense
reimbursement has been recorded as a reduction in research and
development expense.
Adoption
of new accounting standards
Effective October 1, 2010, we adopted the provisions in the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2009-13,
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable
5
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue Arrangements (ASU
2009-13)
and ASU
2009-14.
Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements that
Include Software Elements (ASU
2009-14).
The provisions of ASU
2009-13
apply to arrangements that are outside the scope of software
revenue recognition guidance and amend Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 605 to (1) provide
updated guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the
deliverables in an arrangement should be separated, and the
consideration allocated; (2) require an entity to allocate
revenue in an arrangement using the best estimated selling
prices (BESP) of deliverables if a vendor does not
have vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) or
third-party evidence (TPE) of selling price; and
(3) eliminate the use of the residual method and require an
entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price
method. ASU
2009-14
modifies the scope of ASC Topic 985 to remove industry specific
revenue accounting guidance for software and software related
transactions, tangible products containing software components
and non-software components that function together to deliver
the products essential functionality. The adoption of
these provisions did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2009-13
does not generally change the units of accounting for our
revenue transactions. For multiple-element arrangements that
contain both software and non-software elements such as our
hosted offerings, we allocate revenue to software or software
related elements and any non-software elements separately based
on the selling price hierarchy. We determine the selling price
for each deliverable using VSOE of selling price, if it exists,
or TPE of selling price. If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling
price exist for a deliverable, we use our BESP for that
deliverable. Revenue allocated to each element is then
recognized when the basic revenue recognition criteria are met
for each element.
To determine the selling price in multiple-element arrangements,
we establish VSOE of fair value for the majority of our
post-contract customer support, professional services, and
training based on historical stand-alone sales to third-parties.
Typically, we are unable to determine TPE of selling price and
therefore when neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exist, we
use BESP for the purposes of allocating the arrangement
consideration. We determine BESP for a product or service by
considering multiple factors including, but not limited to,
major product groupings, market conditions, competitive
landscape, price list and discounting practice.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-05,
Comprehensive Income. This ASU intends to enhance
comparability and transparency of other comprehensive income
components. The guidance provides an option to present total
comprehensive income, the components of net income and the
components of other comprehensive income in a single continuous
statement or two separate but consecutive statements. This ASU
eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income
components as part of the statement of changes in
shareowners equity. The provisions of this ASU will be
applied retrospectively for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2011. Early application is permitted.
ASU 2011-05
impacts disclosure only and therefore, is not expected to, have
a material impact on our financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (Topic
820) Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
to add additional disclosures about the different classes of
assets and liabilities measured at fair value, the valuation
techniques and inputs used, the activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements, and transfers between Levels 1, 2, and
3. Levels 1, 2 and 3 of fair value measurements are defined
in Note 8 below. ASU
2010-06 was
effective for us for the interim reporting period beginning
January 1, 2010, except for the provisions related to
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
provisions are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those
fiscal years. ASU
2010-06
6
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
impacts disclosure only and therefore, did not, and is not
expected to, have a material impact on our financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-28,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):
When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for
Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. ASU
2010-28 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010 and amends the criteria for performing Step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or
negative carrying amounts and requires performing Step 2 if
qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not
that a goodwill impairment exists. We do not believe that this
will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
3.
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
41,621
|
|
|
$
|
(1,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,347
|
|
|
$
|
(21,204
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
6,148
|
|
|
|
(19,488
|
)
|
|
|
22,893
|
|
|
|
(31,510
|
)
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
(465
|
)
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of pension loss amortization
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
5,720
|
|
|
|
(18,798
|
)
|
|
|
23,112
|
|
|
|
(29,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
47,341
|
|
|
$
|
(20,328
|
)
|
|
$
|
66,459
|
|
|
$
|
(50,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 Acquisitions
On June 15, 2011, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Equitrac Corporation (Equitrac), a
leading provider of print management solutions, for cash
consideration of approximately $162 million. The
acquisition was a taxable stock purchase and the goodwill
resulting from this acquisition is not expected to be deductible
for tax purposes. The results of operations of Equitrac have
been included in our results of operations from June 15,
2011.
On June 16, 2011, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of SVOX A.G. (SVOX), a German based
seller of speech recognition, dialog, and
text-to-speech
software products for the automotive, mobile and consumer
electronics industries. Total purchase consideration was
87.0 million which consists of cash consideration of
57.0 million ($80.9 million based on the
exchange rate as of the date of acquisition) and a deferred
acquisition payment of 30.0 million ($43.0 million
based on the exchange rate as of the date of acquisition). The
deferred acquisition payment is payable in cash or shares of our
common stock, at our option; 8.3 million of the
deferred acquisition payment is due on June 16, 2012 and
the remaining 21.7 million is due on
December 31, 2012. The acquisition was a taxable stock
purchase and the goodwill resulting from this acquisition is not
expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The results of
operations of SVOX have been included in our results of
operations from June 16, 2011.
7
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the preliminary allocation of the purchase
consideration for Equitrac and SVOX is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equitrac
|
|
|
SVOX
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
161,950
|
|
|
$
|
80,919
|
|
Deferred acquisition payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
161,950
|
|
|
$
|
123,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts receivable(a)
|
|
|
10,724
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
87,705
|
|
|
|
92,478
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets(b)
|
|
|
91,900
|
|
|
|
42,165
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
10,617
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
203,523
|
|
|
|
138,281
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
(9,542
|
)
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(38,311
|
)
|
|
|
(4,830
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(41,573
|
)
|
|
|
(14,372
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
161,950
|
|
|
$
|
123,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Accounts receivable have been recorded at their estimated fair
values, which consists of the gross accounts receivable assumed
of $12.7 million, reduced by a fair value reserve of
$1.1 million representing the portion of contractually owed
accounts receivable which we do not expect to be collected. |
|
(b) |
|
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average useful lives, as
determined based on preliminary valuations (table in thousands,
except for years): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equitrac
|
|
|
SVOX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
55,800
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
$
|
35,612
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
6,268
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
14,100
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
91,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Fiscal 2011 Acquisitions
During fiscal 2011, we acquired two additional businesses,
primarily to expand our product offerings and enhance our
technology base. The results of operations of these acquisitions
have been included in our consolidated results from their
respective acquisition dates. The total consideration for these
acquisitions was $82.1 million, paid in cash. In allocating
the total purchase consideration for these acquisitions based on
estimated fair values, we preliminarily recorded
$42.4 million of goodwill and $34.0 million of
identifiable intangible assets. The allocations of the purchase
consideration are based upon preliminary valuations and our
estimates and assumptions are subject to change. Intangible
assets acquired included primarily customer relationships and
core and completed technology
8
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
with weighted average useful lives of 11.5 years. The
acquisitions were stock acquisitions and the goodwill resulting
from these transactions is not expected to be deductible for tax
purposes.
Proforma
Results
In addition to the acquisitions of Equitrac and SVOX discussed
above, on December 30, 2009, we acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of SpinVox Limited
(Spinvox), a UK-based privately-held company engaged
in the business of providing
voicemail-to-text
services. The following table shows unaudited pro forma results
of operations as if we had acquired SpinVox, Equitrac and SVOX
on October 1, 2009 (dollars in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
348,877
|
|
|
$
|
287,521
|
|
|
$
|
1,007,734
|
|
|
$
|
865,305
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
39,857
|
|
|
|
(5,236
|
)
|
|
|
34,564
|
|
|
|
(55,147
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
We have not furnished pro forma financial information related to
our other fiscal 2011 and 2010 acquisitions because such
information is not material, individually or in the aggregate,
to our financial results. The unaudited pro forma results of
operations are not necessarily indicative of the actual results
that would have occurred had the transactions actually taken
place at the beginning of the periods indicated.
Acquisition-Related
Costs, net
The components of acquisition-related costs, net are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Transition and integration costs
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
3,383
|
|
|
$
|
1,506
|
|
|
$
|
12,035
|
|
Professional service fees
|
|
|
7,775
|
|
|
|
3,079
|
|
|
|
11,107
|
|
|
|
14,933
|
|
Acquisition-related adjustments
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,595
|
|
|
$
|
6,125
|
|
|
$
|
13,910
|
|
|
$
|
26,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in acquisition-related costs, net for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2010, was primarily driven by a reduction in
transition and integration costs offset by an increase in
professional service fees. For the three months ended
June 30, 2010, transition and integration costs consisted
primarily of costs associated with transitional employees from
our acquisitions of SpinVox and eCopy. For the three months
ended June 30, 2011, professional service fees consisted of
expenses related to our third quarter 2011 acquisitions.
The decrease for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, as
compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2010, was
primarily driven by a reduction in transition and integration
costs and professional services fees. For the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, transition and integration costs consisted
primarily of the costs associated with transitional employees
from our acquisitions of SpinVox and eCopy; professional
services consisted of expenses related to our acquisition of
SpinVox in December 2009 and approximately $2.2 million
that had been capitalized as of September 30, 2009 related
to transaction costs incurred in prior periods that was required
to be expensed upon our adoption of ASC 805, Business
Combinations, in fiscal 2010.
9
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Contingent
Acquisition Payments
|
Earn-out
Payments
For business combinations occurring subsequent to the adoption
of ASC 805 in fiscal 2010, the fair value of any contingent
consideration is established at the acquisition date and
included in the total purchase price. The contingent
consideration is then adjusted to fair value as an increase or
decrease in current earnings in each reporting period.
Contingent consideration related to acquisitions prior to our
adoption of ASC 805 have been and will continue to be
recorded as additional purchase price when the contingency is
resolved and additional consideration is attributable.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, Inc.
(Vocada) in November 2007, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $21.0 million upon
the achievement of certain financial targets measured over
defined periods through December 31, 2010, in accordance
with the merger agreement. We have notified the former
shareholders of Vocada that the financial targets were not
achieved. In December 2010, the former shareholders filed a
demand for arbitration in accordance with their rights under the
merger agreement. At June 30, 2011, we have not recorded
any obligation relative to these earn-out provisions.
In connection with the acquisition of Commissure, Inc.
(Commissure) in September 2007, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $8.0 million payable
in stock or cash, solely at our discretion, upon the achievement
of certain financial targets for the fiscal years 2008, 2009 and
2010. In February 2011, we paid $1.0 million upon
determination of the final earn-out achievement and recorded the
payment as additional purchase price allocated to goodwill.
Escrow
and Holdback Arrangements
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have placed
either cash or shares of our common stock in escrow to satisfy
any claims we may have. If no claims are made, the escrowed
amounts will be released to the former shareholders of the
acquired companies. Historically, under the previous accounting
guidance of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141), we could not make a
determination, beyond a reasonable doubt, whether the escrow
would become payable to the former shareholders of these
companies until the escrow period had expired. Accordingly,
these amounts were treated as contingent purchase price until it
was determined that the escrow was payable, at which time the
escrowed amounts would be recorded as additional purchase price
and allocated to goodwill. Under the revised accounting guidance
of ASC 805, escrow payments are generally considered part
of the initial purchase consideration and accounted for as
goodwill.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, the last
remaining escrowed amounts accounted for under previous
accounting guidance expired. Payments totaling $5.2 million
were released to former shareholders of X-Solutions Group B.V.
and eCopy and were recorded as an increase to goodwill during
the period.
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and intangible
assets for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,077,943
|
|
|
$
|
685,865
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
222,545
|
|
|
|
171,556
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
4,366
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,762
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
13,701
|
|
|
|
5,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
2,318,555
|
|
|
$
|
757,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, in addition to
the businesses acquisitions described in Note 4 we made
several purchases of intellectual property. Purchase accounting
adjustments to goodwill recorded during the nine months ended
June 30, 2011, included $5.2 million of releases of
escrow cash related to our fiscal 2009 acquisitions. This
increase in goodwill was partially offset by a $1.4 million
reduction resulting from the finalization of the Spinvox
purchase accounting.
|
|
7.
|
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
Cash
Flow Hedges
Forward
Currency Contracts
We enter into foreign currency contracts to hedge the
variability of cash flows in Canadian Dollars (CAD) and
Hungarian Forints (HUF) which are designated as cash flow
hedges. These contracts settle monthly through October 2011. At
June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, the notional
value and the aggregate cumulative unrealized gains on the
outstanding contracts were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Cumulative
|
|
|
|
Notional Value
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Canadian Dollars
|
|
$
|
1,547
|
|
|
$
|
13,032
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
Hungarian Forints
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
4,564
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contracts designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
$
|
2,183
|
|
|
$
|
17,596
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Derivatives not Designated as Hedges
Forward
Currency Contracts
We operate our business in countries throughout the world and
transact business in various foreign currencies. Our foreign
currency exposures typically arise from transactions denominated
in currencies other than the local functional currency of our
operations. During fiscal 2011, we commenced a program that
primarily utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to offset
the risks associated with foreign currency denominated assets
and liabilities. We established this program so that gains and
losses from remeasurement or settlement of these assets and
liabilities are offset by gains or losses on the foreign
currency forward contracts thus mitigating the risks and
volatility associated with our foreign currency transactions.
Generally, we enter into contracts with terms of 30 days or
less, and at June 30, 2011 we had outstanding contracts
with a total notional value of $165.4 million.
We have not designated these forward contracts as hedging
instruments pursuant to ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging
and accordingly, we recorded the fair value of these
contracts at the end of each reporting period in our
consolidated balance sheet, with changes in the fair value
recorded in earnings as other income (expense), net in our
consolidated statement of operations. During the three and nine
month periods ended June 30, 2011, we recorded losses of
$0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively,
associated with these contracts.
Security
Price Guarantees
From time to time we enter into agreements that allow us to
issue shares of our common stock as part or all of the
consideration related to partnering and technology acquisition
activities. Generally these shares are issued subject to
security price guarantees which are accounted for as
derivatives. We have determined that these instruments would not
be considered equity instruments if they were freestanding. The
security price guarantees require payment from either us to a
third party, or from a third party to us, based upon the
difference between the price of our common stock on the issue
date and an average price of our common stock approximately six
months following the issue date. Changes in
11
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the fair value of these security price guarantees are reported
in earnings in each period as other income (expense), net.
During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011, we
recorded gains of $0.4 million and $10.8 million,
respectively, associated with these contracts. We received cash
totaling $10.0 million to settle certain of these contracts
during the three months ended June 30, 2011.
The following table provides a summary of the fair value of our
derivative instruments as of June 30, 2011 and
September 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Security price guarantees
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security price guarantees
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) value of non-hedge derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value of hedge derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize the activity of derivative
instruments for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):
Derivatives
Designated as Hedges for the Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
(321
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives
Designated as Hedges for the Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
|
$
|
(99
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
978
|
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,517
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(503
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
12
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivatives
Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(217
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(675
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Security price guarantees
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
|
$
|
(1,044
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,844
|
|
|
$
|
3,664
|
|
Other
Financial Instruments
Financial instruments, including cash equivalents, restricted
cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and derivative instruments, are carried in the
consolidated financial statements at amounts that approximate
their fair value.
The fair value of our long-term debt was estimated to be
$963.3 million and $902.2 million at June 30,
2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively. The increase in
the fair value is primarily related to the convertible debt,
reflecting the increase in the underlying stock price during the
period. These fair value amounts represent the value at which
our lenders could trade our debt within the financial markets,
and do not represent the settlement value of these long-term
debt liabilities to us at each reporting date. The fair value of
the long-term debt issues will continue to vary each period
based on fluctuations in market interest rates, changes to our
credit ratings and, for the outstanding convertible debt,
changes in our stock price. These fluctuations may have little
to no correlation to our reported debt balances. The term loan
portion of our Credit Facility is traded and the fair values are
based upon traded prices as of the reporting dates. The fair
values of the 2.75% Convertible Debentures at each
respective reporting date were estimated using the averages of
the June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 bid and ask
trading quotes. We had no outstanding balance on the revolving
credit line portion of our Credit Facility. Our capital lease
obligations and other debt are not traded and the fair values of
these instruments are assumed to approximate their carrying
values as of June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an
asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Valuation techniques must maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When determining
the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required
to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most
advantageous market in which we would transact and consider
assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the
asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer
restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.
ASC 820, Fair Value Measures and Disclosures, establishes
a value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the third is considered
unobservable:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1. Quoted prices for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets which we can access.
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Observable inputs other than
those described as Level 1.
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs.
|
13
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010
consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds(a)
|
|
$
|
231,198
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
231,198
|
|
Time Deposits(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,607
|
|
US government agency securities(a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Marketable securities, $36,562 at cost(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,617
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
Security price guarantees(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
232,198
|
|
|
$
|
136,404
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
368,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
Contingent earn-out(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
$
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds(a)
|
|
$
|
470,845
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
470,845
|
|
US government agency securities(a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Marketable securities, $33,337 at cost(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,366
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
471,845
|
|
|
$
|
34,862
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
506,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security price guarantees(c)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
Interest rate swaps(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
Contingent earn-out(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Money market funds and US government agency securities, included
in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheet,
are valued at quoted market prices in active markets. |
|
(b) |
|
The fair value of our time deposits, marketable securities and
foreign currency exchange contracts is based on the most recent
observable inputs for similar instruments in active markets or
quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets
that are not active or are directly or indirectly observable. |
|
(c) |
|
The fair values of the security price guarantees are determined
using a modified Black-Scholes model, derived from observable
inputs such as US treasury interest rates, our common stock
price, and the volatility of our common stock. The valuation
model values both the put and call components of the guarantees
simultaneously, with the net value of those components
representing the fair value of each instrument. |
|
(d) |
|
The fair value of our contingent consideration arrangement is
determined based on the Companys evaluation as to the
probability and amount of any earn-out that will be achieved
based on expected future performance by |
14
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
the acquired entity, as well as our common stock price since the
contingent consideration arrangement is payable in shares of our
common stock. |
|
(e) |
|
The fair values of the interest rate swaps are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses that factor in observable market
inputs such as LIBOR based yield curves, forward
rates, and credit spreads. |
The changes in the fair value of contingent earn-out liabilities
during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,679
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
Charges to acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earn-out payments are generally payable based on achieving
certain financial targets during defined post-acquisition time
periods as specified in the purchase and sale agreement for each
acquisition. Changes in the fair value during the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2011 resulted from improved revenue
performance together with an increase in our stock price during
the earn-out period.
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the
following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$
|
76,251
|
|
|
$
|
56,047
|
|
Sales and marketing incentives(a)
|
|
|
17,174
|
|
|
|
40,780
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
13,187
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
Accrued business combination costs
|
|
|
10,038
|
|
|
|
10,197
|
|
Sales and other taxes payable
|
|
|
9,091
|
|
|
|
5,211
|
|
Cost of revenue related liabilities
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
10,028
|
|
Acquisition costs and liabilities
|
|
|
8,299
|
|
|
|
4,970
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
Security price guarantee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11,307
|
|
|
|
9,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
157,632
|
|
|
$
|
151,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The decrease in accrued sales and marketing incentives was
driven by an 18.0 million ($23.4 million
equivalent) payment in December 2010 for a fixed obligation
assumed in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox. The
related 18.0 million of restricted cash was placed in
an irrevocable standby letter of credit account at the end of
fiscal year 2010 and was released upon satisfaction of the
liability in December 2010. At June 30, 2011, we have an
additional 5.0 million ($7.2 million equivalent)
of restricted cash that has been placed in an irrevocable
standby letter of credit for a related liability. |
15
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred revenue consisted of the following (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
$
|
98,071
|
|
|
$
|
90,969
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
85,384
|
|
|
|
51,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
183,455
|
|
|
$
|
142,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
$
|
20,274
|
|
|
$
|
12,902
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
61,228
|
|
|
|
63,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
81,502
|
|
|
$
|
76,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue consists of prepaid fees received
for post-contract customer support for our products, including
telephone support and the right to receive unspecified
upgrades/enhancements on a
when-and-if-available
basis. Unearned revenue includes upfront fees for setup and
implementation activities related to hosted offerings; certain
software arrangements for which we do not have fair value of
post-contract customer support, resulting in ratable revenue
recognition for the entire arrangement on a straight-line basis;
and fees in excess of estimated earnings on
percentage-of-completion
service contracts.
The increase in the deferred maintenance revenue is primarily
related to an increase in Imaging maintenance and support as
well as an increase in Enterprise application maintenance.
Unearned revenue increased as a result of
set-up fees
on new hosting arrangements that will be recognized ratably over
the longer of the contract lives, or the expected lives of the
customer relationship as well as billings in excess of revenues
earned on several large professional service implementation
projects.
|
|
11.
|
Business
Combination Costs
|
The activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2011,
relating to all facilities and personnel recorded in accrued
business combination costs, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
23,871
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
24,030
|
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(8,616
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(8,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
15,788
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
10,038
|
|
|
$
|
10,197
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
5,750
|
|
|
|
13,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,788
|
|
|
$
|
24,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges, net
|
The following table sets forth the nine months ended
June 30, 2011 accrual activity relating to restructuring
and other charges (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,838
|
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,121
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
3,854
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
5,572
|
|
Non-cash adjustment
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(4,629
|
)
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(5,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,271
|
|
|
$
|
891
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded net
restructuring and other charges of $5.6 million, which
included $3.9 million of severance and other costs related
to the elimination of approximately 90 personnel across
multiple functions worldwide, primarily within costs of sales,
and $1.5 million related to facilities that we no longer
occupy.
|
|
13.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
|
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
We have $250 million of 2.75% convertible senior debentures
due in August 2027. As of June 30, 2011, no conversion
triggers were met. If the conversion triggers were met, we could
be required to repay all or some of the principal amount in cash
prior to maturity.
Credit
Facility
We have a credit facility which originally consisted of a
$75 million revolving credit line, reduced by outstanding
letters of credit, a $355 million term loan entered into on
March 31, 2006, a $90 million term loan entered into
on April 5, 2007 and a $225 million term loan entered
into on August 24, 2007 (collectively the Credit
Facility). The revolving credit line was due in March
2012. The original provisions of the credit facility called for
quarterly principal and interest payments on the term loans,
with an original maturity in March 2013. In July 2011, we
entered into agreements to amend and restate our existing Credit
Facility. Of the approximately $638.5 million remaining
Term Loan originally due March 31, 2013, lenders
representing $486.9 million have elected to extend the
maturity date three years to March 31, 2016. The remaining
$151.6 million in term loans are due March 2013. In
addition, lenders participating in the revolving credit facility
have chosen to extend the maturity date by three years to
March 31, 2015.
In conjunction with the amendment, the Credit Facility repayment
terms were amended. Principal is due in four quarterly
installments of 1% per annum through the original maturity date
of March 2013, at which time the principal remaining on the
unextended portion of the loans becomes payable. The table below
details the new
17
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
schedule of principal payments by fiscal year. If only the
minimum required repayments are made, the annual aggregate
principal amount of the term loans repaid would be as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011 (quarter ending September 30)
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,346
|
|
2013
|
|
|
154,494
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,743
|
|
2015
|
|
|
4,696
|
|
2016
|
|
|
466,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
638,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under terms of the amendment, borrowings under the Credit
Facility bear interest at a rate equal to the applicable margin
plus, at our option, either (a) the base rate which is the
higher of the corporate base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or
the federal funds rate plus 0.50% per annum or (b) LIBOR
(equal to (i) the British Bankers Association
Interest Settlement Rates for deposits in U.S. dollars
divided by (ii) one minus the statutory reserves applicable
to such borrowing). The applicable margin for the borrowings is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Base Rate Margin
|
|
LIBOR Margin
|
|
Term loans due March 2013
|
|
0.75% - 1.50%(a)
|
|
1.75% - 2.50%(a)
|
Term loans due March 2016
|
|
2.00%
|
|
3.00%
|
Revolving facility due March 2015
|
|
1.25% - 2.25%(b)
|
|
2.25% - 3.25%(b)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The margin is determined based on our leverage ratio at the date
the interest rates are reset on the Term Loans. |
|
(b) |
|
The margin is determined based on our credit rating at the date
the interest rates are reset on the Revolving Loans |
As of June 30, 2011 (prior to the amendment), based on our
leverage ratio, the applicable margin for our term loan was
0.75% for base rate borrowings and 1.75% for LIBOR-based
borrowings. This results in an effective interest rate of 1.95%.
No payments under the excess cash flow sweep provision were due
in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as no excess cash flow, as
defined, was generated in fiscal 2010. At the current time, we
are unable to predict the amount of the outstanding principal,
if any, that we may be required to repay in future fiscal years
pursuant to the excess cash flow sweep provisions.
As of June 30, 2011, $638.5 million remained
outstanding under the term loans, there were $15.7 million
of letters of credit issued under the revolving credit line and
there were no other outstanding borrowings under the revolving
credit line. As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance
with the covenants under the Credit Facility.
18
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
|
The following table sets forth the computation for basic and
diluted net income (loss) per share for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. (amounts in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
basic
|
|
$
|
41,621
|
|
|
$
|
(1,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,347
|
|
|
$
|
(21,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
diluted
|
|
$
|
41,621
|
|
|
$
|
(1,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,347
|
|
|
$
|
(21,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
303,100
|
|
|
|
291,610
|
|
|
|
300,846
|
|
|
|
285,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
303,100
|
|
|
|
291,610
|
|
|
|
300,846
|
|
|
|
285,202
|
|
Weighted average effect of dilutive common equivalent shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed conversion of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock compensation plan
|
|
|
8,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contingently issuable shares
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
317,802
|
|
|
|
291,610
|
|
|
|
314,791
|
|
|
|
285,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of
diluted net income (loss) per share if their effect is
anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares
aggregating to 3.6 million and 3.5 million shares for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, and 19.9 million and 21.8 million shares
for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted
net income (loss) per share because their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
We have, from time to time, entered into stock and warrant
agreements with Warburg Pincus. In connection with these
agreements, we granted Warburg Pincus the right to request that
we use commercially reasonable efforts to register some or all
of the shares of common stock issued to them pursuant to the
purchase agreements, including
19
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
shares of common stock underlying the warrants. At June 30,
2011, Warburg Pincus holds the following warrants to purchase
shares of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance Date
|
|
Price per Share
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
January 29, 2009
|
|
$
|
11.57
|
|
|
|
3,862,422
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2013
|
|
May 20, 2008
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
May 20, 2012
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
We recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite
service period. Our share-based awards are accounted for as
equity instruments. The amounts included in the consolidated
statements of operations relating to stock-based compensation
are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting
|
|
|
5,764
|
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
|
20,514
|
|
|
|
8,173
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
|
|
18,188
|
|
|
|
6,731
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
10,341
|
|
|
|
12,516
|
|
|
|
32,748
|
|
|
|
29,813
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,883
|
|
|
|
10,512
|
|
|
|
36,481
|
|
|
|
27,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
33,788
|
|
|
$
|
28,094
|
|
|
$
|
109,505
|
|
|
$
|
72,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in stock-based compensation for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2011 is $11.0 million and
$24.1 million, respectively, of expense related to awards
that will be made as part of the fiscal 2011 annual bonus plan
to employees. The annual bonus pool is determined by management
and approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors based on financial performance targets approved at the
beginning of the year. If these targets are achieved, the awards
will be settled in shares based on the total bonus earned and
the grant date fair value of the shares awarded to each employee.
Stock
Options
The table below summarizes activity relating to stock options
for the nine months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
10,703,237
|
|
|
$
|
8.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,448,623
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(89,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(63,401
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
9,101,660
|
|
|
$
|
9.79
|
|
|
|
3.4 years
|
|
|
$
|
106.3 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
6,917,436
|
|
|
$
|
8.21
|
|
|
|
2.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
91.7 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
8,021,090
|
|
|
$
|
6.94
|
|
|
|
2.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
65.9 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in this table was calculated based
on the positive difference, if any, between the closing market
value of our common stock on June 30, 2011 ($21.47) and the
exercise price of the underlying options. |
As of June 30, 2011, the total unamortized fair value of
stock options was $5.9 million with a weighted average
remaining recognition period of 0.8 years. A summary of
weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted
and intrinsic value of stock options exercised is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
6.13
|
|
|
$
|
5.90
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised (in millions)
|
|
$
|
32.9
|
|
|
$
|
34.1
|
|
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the
grant-date fair value of an award. The fair value of the stock
options granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010 were calculated using the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
46.1
|
%
|
|
|
50.9
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Restricted
Units
Restricted Units are not included in issued and outstanding
common stock until the shares are vested and released. The table
below summarizes activity relating to Restricted Units for the
nine months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
|
Contingent Awards
|
|
|
Time-Based Awards
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
2,867,840
|
|
|
|
7,795,114
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,329,988
|
|
|
|
3,521,636
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(1,296,018
|
)
|
|
|
(3,273,826
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(360,009
|
)
|
|
|
(557,123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
2,541,801
|
|
|
|
7,485,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of outstanding
Restricted Units
|
|
|
1.0 years
|
|
|
|
1.1 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding Restricted Units(1)
|
|
$
|
54.6 million
|
|
|
$
|
160.7 million
|
|
Restricted Units vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
2,383,251
|
|
|
|
6,961,901
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of Restricted Units
vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
1.0 years
|
|
|
|
1.1 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of Restricted Units vested and
expected to vest(1)
|
|
$
|
51.2 million
|
|
|
$
|
149.5 million
|
|
21
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in this table was calculated based
on the positive difference between the closing market value of
our common stock on June 30, 2011 ($21.47) and the exercise
price of the underlying Restricted Units. |
The purchase price for vested Restricted Units is $0.001 per
share. As of June 30, 2011, unearned stock-based
compensation expense related to all unvested Restricted Units is
$121.5 million, which will, based on expectations of future
performance vesting criteria, where applicable, be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
A summary of weighted-average grant-date fair value and
intrinsic value of all Restricted Units vested is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
17.91
|
|
|
$
|
15.59
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares vested (in millions)
|
|
$
|
81.8
|
|
|
$
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
18,231
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
28,365
|
|
|
$
|
(16,745
|
)
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(23,390
|
)
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
(14,982
|
)
|
|
|
4,459
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
(128.3
|
)%
|
|
|
608.3
|
%
|
|
|
(52.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(26.6
|
)%
|
The change in the effective tax rate and the decrease in the
income tax provision, was primarily related to a one-time tax
benefit recorded in connection with the Equitrac acquisition. We
recorded a deferred tax liability in purchase accounting
allowing a release of our existing valuation reserve, resulting
in the recognition of a tax benefit for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2011. This tax benefit was offset by
the tax on U.S. profits in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2011.
At June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, the liability
for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions was
$13.4 million and $12.8 million, respectively. The
increase is primarily attributable to accrued interest. We do
not expect a significant change in the amount of unrecognized
tax benefits within the next twelve months
|
|
18.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Litigation
and Other Claims
Like many companies in the software industry, we have, from time
to time, been notified of claims that we may be infringing, or
contributing to the infringement of, the intellectual property
rights of others. These claims have been referred to counsel,
and they are in various stages of evaluation and negotiation. If
it appears necessary or desirable, we may seek licenses for
these intellectual property rights. There is no assurance that
licenses will be offered by all claimants, that the terms of any
offered licenses will be acceptable to us or that in all cases
the dispute will be resolved without litigation, which may be
time consuming and expensive, and may result in injunctive
relief or the payment of damages by us.
Vianix LLC has filed three legal actions against us, consisting
of two breach of contract actions and a copyright infringement
claim. These matters were concluded during the three months
ended March 31, 2011. The resolution of these matters did
not have a material impact on our financial statements or
liquidity.
We do not believe that the final outcome of the above referenced
litigation matters will have a material adverse effect on our
financial position and results of operations. However, even if
our defense is successful, the litigation
22
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
could require significant management time and will be costly.
Should we not prevail, our operating results, financial position
and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
Guarantees
and Other Commitments
We include indemnification provisions in the contracts we enter
into with customers and business partners. Generally, these
provisions require us to defend claims arising out of our
products infringement of third-party intellectual property
rights, breach of contractual obligations
and/or
unlawful or otherwise culpable conduct. The indemnity
obligations generally cover damages, costs and attorneys
fees arising out of such claims. In most, but not all, cases,
our total liability under such provisions is limited to either
the value of the contract or a specified, agreed upon amount. In
some cases our total liability under such provisions is
unlimited. In many, but not all cases, the term of the indemnity
provision is perpetual. While the maximum potential amount of
future payments we could be required to make under all the
indemnification provisions is unlimited, we believe the
estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal due to the
low frequency with which these provisions have been triggered.
We indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent
permitted by law. These agreements, among other things,
indemnify directors and officers for expenses, judgments, fines,
penalties and settlement amounts incurred by such persons in
their capacity as a director or officer of the company,
regardless of whether the individual is serving in any such
capacity at the time the liability or expense is incurred.
Additionally, in connection with certain acquisitions we have
agreed to indemnify the former officers and members of the
boards of directors of those companies, on similar terms as
described above, for a period of six years from the acquisition
date. In certain cases we purchase director and officer
insurance policies related to these obligations, which fully
cover the six year periods. To the extent that we do not
purchase a director and officer insurance policy for the full
period of any contractual indemnification, we would be required
to pay for costs incurred, if any, as described above.
|
|
19.
|
Segment
and Geographic Information and Significant Customers
|
We follow the provisions of ASC 280, Segment
Reporting, which establishes standards for reporting
information about operating segments. ASC 280 also
established standards for disclosures about products, services
and geographic areas. Operating segments are defined as
components of an enterprise for which separate financial
information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief
operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources
and in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker
(CODM) is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
We have four customer-facing market groups that oversee the core
markets where we conduct business. These groups are referred to
as Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer, Enterprise and Imaging.
These groups do not directly manage centralized or shared
resources or make allocation decisions regarding the activities
related to these functions, which include sales and sales
operations, certain research and development initiatives,
business development and all general and administrative
activities. Our CODM oversees these groups as well as each of
the functions that provide the shared and centralized activities
noted above. To manage the business, allocate resources and
assess performance, the CODM regularly reviews revenue data by
market group, while reviewing gross margins, operating margins,
and other measures of income or loss on a consolidated basis.
Thus, we have determined that we operate in one segment.
23
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents revenue information for our four
core markets (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
135,409
|
|
|
$
|
113,523
|
|
|
$
|
373,543
|
|
|
$
|
324,880
|
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
91,613
|
|
|
|
66,292
|
|
|
|
270,842
|
|
|
|
208,153
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
68,536
|
|
|
|
71,006
|
|
|
|
211,900
|
|
|
|
217,306
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
33,351
|
|
|
|
22,382
|
|
|
|
95,415
|
|
|
|
58,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
328,909
|
|
|
$
|
273,203
|
|
|
$
|
951,700
|
|
|
$
|
809,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States provided greater than
10% of our total revenue for the three months and nine months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Revenue, classified by the major
geographic areas in which our customers are located, was as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
237,423
|
|
|
$
|
202,080
|
|
|
$
|
701,374
|
|
|
$
|
576,122
|
|
International
|
|
|
91,486
|
|
|
|
71,123
|
|
|
|
250,326
|
|
|
|
233,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
328,909
|
|
|
$
|
273,203
|
|
|
$
|
951,700
|
|
|
$
|
809,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States held greater than 10% of
our long-lived or total assets as of June 30, 2011 and September
30, 2010. Our non-current assets, including intangible assets
and goodwill, were located as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,633,100
|
|
|
$
|
2,479,952
|
|
International
|
|
|
598,052
|
|
|
|
448,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,231,152
|
|
|
$
|
2,928,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
CAUTIONARY
NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
including the sections entitled Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure About Market Risk under Items 2 and 3,
respectively, of Part I of this report, and the sections
entitled Legal Proceedings, Risk
Factors, and Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
and Use of Proceeds under Items 1, 1A and 2,
respectively, of Part II of this report, contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never materialize or
if they prove incorrect, could cause our consolidated results to
differ materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
include predictions regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
our future revenues, cost of revenues, research and development
expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses,
amortization of intangible assets and gross margin;
|
|
|
|
our strategy relating to our core markets;
|
|
|
|
the potential of future product releases;
|
|
|
|
our product development plans and investments in research and
development;
|
|
|
|
future acquisitions, and anticipated benefits from acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
international operations and localized versions of our
products; and
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings and litigation matters.
|
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by
the use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks described in Item 1A Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee
future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to
the forward-looking statements or reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this document.
25
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis is
intended to help the reader understand the results of operations
and financial condition of our business. Managements
Discussion and Analysis is provided as a supplement to, and
should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
OVERVIEW
Business
Overview
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of voice and
language solutions for businesses and consumers around the
world. Our technologies, applications and services make the user
experience more compelling by transforming the way people
interact with devices and systems. Our solutions are used every
day by millions of people and thousands of businesses for tasks
and services such as requesting information from a phone-based
self-service solution, dictating medical records, searching the
mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a navigation
system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions help make
these interactions, tasks and experiences more productive,
compelling and efficient.
Core
Markets
Our technologies address our four core markets, each of which is
described in greater detail below.
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare. Our healthcare products and
services enable our customers to automate manual functions, and
manage information and workflows. A significant component of
sales in our healthcare market are for on-demand solutions
hosted by Nuance and priced by the volume of services used by
the customer, primarily for healthcare information management.
With these solutions, we provide software and labor to
transcribe information dictated by healthcare providers that go
into patient files, and to manage the associated workflows. The
healthcare information management market is migrating away from
unstructured, distributed files toward structured,
computer-accessible, searchable files generally known as
electronic medical records or EMRs. Our solutions address both
the old unstructured files and EMRs, and we are able to provide
technology and services that help our customers through this
transition. In addition to healthcare information management, we
provide solutions for areas such as radiology, diagnostics,
critical test results management, mobile access to systems, and
processing data contained in medical records. Trends in our
healthcare business include a growing customer preference for
hosted solutions, increasing interest in the use of mobile
devices to access healthcare systems and records, and increasing
international interest. We are also seeing increased demand for
transactions which involve the sale and delivery of both
software and non-software related services or products, which
may benefit from the application of Financial Accounting
Standards board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 605, Revenue Recognition.
Over the last several quarters, we have signed several new
contracts for our hosted solutions, and the volume of lines
processed in these services has steadily increased. We are
investing to expand our product set to address these
opportunities, expand our international capabilities, and reduce
our time from contract signing to initiation of billable
services.
|
|
|
|
Mobile and Consumer. The majority of sales in
our mobile-consumer market are for voice recognition,
text-to-speech
and enhanced keyboard functionality that is embedded in a device
(such as a cell phone, car or tablet computer) or installed on a
personal computer. There is a growing trend toward supplementing
those solutions with mobile connected services such as Internet
search, dictation and transcription of voice messages, that are
performed on hosted Nuance servers and accessed by mobile
devices using the Internet or mobile telephony network, and also
for applications that can be downloaded onto mobile devices.
Trends in our mobile-consumer market also include device
manufacturers requiring custom applications to deliver unique
and differentiated products, broadening keyboard technologies to
take advantage of touch screens, increasing hands-free
capabilities on cell phones and automobiles to address the
growing concern of distracted driving, and the adoption of our
technology on a broadening scope of devices, such as
televisions, set-top boxes,
e-book
readers and tablet computers. We are also seeing increased
demand for transactions
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
which involve the sale and delivery of both software and
non-software related services or products, which may benefit
from the application of ASC 605. We are investing to increase
our capabilities and capacity to help device manufacturers build
custom applications, to increase the capacity of our data
centers, to increase the number, kinds and capacity of network
services, to enable developers to access our technology, and to
expand both awareness and channels for our
direct-to-consumer
products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise. Sales in our enterprise market
include on-demand solutions hosted by Nuance and priced by the
volume of services used by the customer, as well as professional
services to design, implement and integrate custom call center
applications. Our objective for enterprise is to increase
revenue, primarily by enabling customers to automate call center
operations and call handling, and also to provide improved
ability to analyze and use call center data, to enable mobile
access, and to improve cross-channel coordination among call
center, Internet and mobile customer-care functions. The call
center market is migrating away from simple menu-driven
applications toward more sophisticated, easier to use
applications based on natural language capabilities. Our
solutions address both menu-driven and natural language
applications. In addition, we provide solutions for areas such
as mobile access to customer care systems and call center
analytics. Trends in our enterprise business include increasing
interest in the use of mobile applications to access customer
care systems and records, increasing interest in coordinating
actions and data across customer care channels, and the ability
of a broader set of hardware providers and systems integrators
to serve the market. We are investing to expand our product set
to address these opportunities, to increase efficiency of our
hosted applications, expand our capabilities and capacity to
help customers build custom applications, and broaden our
relationships with new hardware and systems integrator partners
serving the market.
|
|
|
|
Imaging. Sales in our imaging market include
document capture and print management solutions embedded in
copiers and multi-function printers and packaged software for
document management. The imaging market is evolving to include
more networked solutions, mobile access to networked solutions,
and multi-function devices. We are investing to improve mobile
access to our networked products, expand our distribution
channels and embedding relationships, and expand our language
coverage.
|
Acquisitions
We have supplemented organic growth with acquisitions. Over the
last few years, our acquisitions have focused on adding new
solutions that take advantage of our core technology, adding
functionality to our existing solutions, expanding our sales and
professional services teams, and expanding our customer base. We
expect that new uses for our core technologies will continue to
emerge and that international opportunities will grow. We expect
that we will continue to serve evolving market opportunities
through a combination of organic growth, acquisitions and
strategic partnerships.
We believe we can fund our future acquisitions with our
internally available cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities, cash generated from operations, amounts available
under our existing debt capacity, additional borrowings or from
the issuance of additional securities. We estimate the financial
impact of any potential acquisition with regard to earnings,
operating margin and cash flow targets before deciding to move
forward with an acquisition.
Key
Metrics
In evaluating the financial condition and operating performance
of our business, management focuses on revenue, net income,
gross margins, operating margins and cash flow from operations.
A summary of these key financial metrics for the nine months
ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue increased by $142.5 million to
$951.7 million;
|
|
|
|
Net income increased by $64.6 million to $43.3 million;
|
|
|
|
Gross margins decreased by 1.3 percentage points to 61.8%;
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margins increased by 4.3 percentage points to
4.6%; and
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities increased by
$74.8 million to $259.5 million.
|
In addition to the above key financial metrics, we also focus on
certain non-financial performance indicators. A summary of these
key non-financial performance indicators as of and for the
period ended June 30, 2011, as compared to June 30,
2010, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized line run-rate in our on-demand healthcare solutions
increased 12% to approximately 3.706 billion lines per
year. The annualized line run-rate is determined using billed
equivalent line counts in a given quarter, multiplied by four;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise professional services backlog hours increased 1% to
316,000 hours. Professional services backlog hours reflect
the accumulated estimated hours necessary to fulfill all of our
existing, executed professional services contracts within the
enterprise business, including those that are cancelable by
customers, based on the original estimate of hours sold;
|
|
|
|
Estimated
3-year value
of on-demand contracts increased 21% to $1.3 billion. We
determine this value by using our best estimate of all
anticipated future revenue streams under signed on-demand
contracts currently in place, whether or not they are guaranteed
through a minimum commitment clause. Our best estimate is based
on assumptions about launch dates, volumes and renewal rates
within the three year period. Most of these contracts are priced
by volume of usage and typically have no or low minimum
commitments. Actual revenue could vary from our estimates due to
factors such as cancellations, non-renewals or volume
fluctuations.
|
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
TOTAL
REVENUES
The following tables show total revenue from our four core
markets and revenue by geographic location, based on the
location of our customers, in dollars and percentage change
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
135.4
|
|
|
$
|
113.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
373.5
|
|
|
$
|
324.9
|
|
|
$
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
91.6
|
|
|
|
66.3
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
|
|
270.9
|
|
|
|
208.2
|
|
|
|
62.7
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
68.5
|
|
|
|
71.0
|
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
|
211.9
|
|
|
|
217.3
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
Imaging
|
|
|
33.4
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
%
|
|
|
95.4
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
62.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
328.9
|
|
|
$
|
273.2
|
|
|
$
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
951.7
|
|
|
$
|
809.2
|
|
|
$
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
237.4
|
|
|
$
|
202.1
|
|
|
$
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
701.4
|
|
|
$
|
576.1
|
|
|
$
|
125.3
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
91.5
|
|
|
|
71.1
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
|
|
250.3
|
|
|
|
233.1
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
328.9
|
|
|
$
|
273.2
|
|
|
$
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
951.7
|
|
|
$
|
809.2
|
|
|
$
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, revenues
increased in Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer and Imaging as
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. These
increases in revenue were partially offset by a slight decrease
in Enterprise revenue. Mobile and Consumer revenue increased
primarily as a result of $19.5 million of additional
product and licensing revenues as well as a $5.6 million
increase in professional services and hosting revenues. The
increase in Healthcare revenues was primarily driven by an
increase of $11.3 million in product and licensing revenue
and $8.0 million in professional services and hosting
revenue. The Imaging revenue increase was attributable to growth
in product and licensing revenues.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, revenue increased
in Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer and Imaging as compared to
the nine months ended June 30, 2010. These increases in
revenue were partially offset by a slight decrease in Enterprise
revenues. Mobile and Consumer revenues increased
$62.7 million, with a $37.1 million
28
increase in product and license revenues as well as a
$24.4 million increase in professional services and hosting
revenues. Healthcare revenues increased $48.6 million
driven by a $29.1 million increase in professional services
and hosting revenues and a $14.1 million increase in
product and licensing revenue. Enterprise revenues decreased
slightly, consisting of a $15.2 million decrease in
professional services and hosting revenue, offset by an increase
of $7.4 million in product and licensing revenues. The
Imaging revenue increase was attributable to growth in product
and licensing revenues.
Product
and Licensing Revenue
Product and licensing revenue primarily consists of sales and
licenses of our technology. The following table shows product
and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of total
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
152.7
|
|
|
$
|
108.8
|
|
|
$
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
40.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
428.2
|
|
|
$
|
335.2
|
|
|
$
|
93.0
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
46.5
|
%
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in product and licensing revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2010, included a $19.5 million increase
in Mobile & Consumer product and licensing revenue,
primarily driven by growth in sales of Mobile embedded solutions
and our Dragon products. Healthcare product and licensing
revenue increased $11.3 million resulting from strong
bookings during the quarter. Imaging product and licensing
revenue increased $10.7 million primarily driven by growth
in sales of multi-functional peripheral licenses. Enterprise on
premise license sales increased $2.4 million resulting from
the refocusing of our sales efforts from channel to direct sales.
The increase in product and licensing revenue for the nine
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months
ended June 30, 2010, consisted of a $37.2 million
increase in Mobile and Consumer product and licensing revenues,
which was primarily driven by growth in sales of our Dragon
products. Imaging product and licensing revenue increased
$34.3 million, primarily from sales of multi-functional
peripheral products. Healthcare product and licensing revenue
increased $14.1 million. Enterprise on premise license
sales increased $7.4 million resulting from the refocusing
of our sales efforts from channel to direct sales.
Professional
Services and Hosting Revenue
Professional services revenue primarily consists of consulting,
implementation and training services for customers. Hosting
revenue primarily relates to delivering hosted services, such as
medical transcription, automated customer care applications,
voice message transcription, and mobile search and
transcription, over a specified term. The following table shows
professional services and hosting revenue, in dollars and as a
percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
125.4
|
|
|
$
|
117.9
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
377.1
|
|
|
$
|
337.8
|
|
|
$
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
38.1
|
%
|
|
|
43.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
|
|
41.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2010, included an
$8.1 million increase in Healthcare revenue driven by
growth in our on-demand solutions. Mobile and Consumer revenue
increased $5.6 million primarily as a result of growth in
our connected mobile services of $3.8 million and $1.8 million
in professional services for our embedded solutions. Enterprise
revenue decreased by $6.4 million, primarily due to the
decline of an early, on-demand customers volume.
29
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
the nine months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the
nine months ended June 30, 2010, consisted of a
$29.1 million increase in Healthcare revenue primarily
driven by growth in our on-demand solutions. Mobile and Consumer
revenue increased $24.4 million primarily driven by
$14.7 million of growth in our connected mobile services
and $9.6 million of growth in professional services for our
embedded solutions. Enterprise revenue decreased by
$15.2 million, primarily as a result of the decline of an
early, on-demand customers volume.
Maintenance
and Support Revenue
Maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of technical
support and maintenance services. The following table shows
maintenance and support revenue, in dollars and as a percentage
of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
50.8
|
|
|
$
|
46.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
146.4
|
|
|
$
|
136.2
|
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2010, is consistent with the growth in
product and licensing sales. The increase included a
$2.5 million increase in Healthcare and a $1.5 million
increase in Enterprise.
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for the nine
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months
ended June 30, 2010, is consistent with the growth in
product and licensing sales. The increase included a
$5.4 million increase in Healthcare and a $2.4
increase million in Enterprise.
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
Cost of
Product and Licensing Revenue
Cost of product and licensing revenue primarily consists of
material and fulfillment costs, manufacturing and operations
costs and third-party royalty expenses. The following table
shows cost of product and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a
percentage of product and licensing revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
15.8
|
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
47.9
|
|
|
$
|
34.2
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of product and licensing revenue
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of product and licensing revenue for the
three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same
period in 2010, was primarily due to an increase in hardware
cost associated with higher product and license revenues. Gross
margin remained relatively flat during the period.
The increase in cost of product and licensing revenue for the
nine months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to same period
in 2010, was primarily due to an increase in hardware cost
associated with higher product and licensing revenues. Gross
margin decreased one percentage point due to growth in Imaging
product sales.
Cost of
Professional Services and Hosting Revenue
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue primarily
consists of compensation for consulting personnel, outside
consultants and overhead, as well as the hardware and
communications fees that support our hosting
30
solutions. The following table shows cost of professional
services and hosting revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of
professional services and hosting revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
83.3
|
|
|
$
|
71.4
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
248.0
|
|
|
$
|
206.3
|
|
|
$
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
|
66.5
|
%
|
|
|
60.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
%
|
|
|
61.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010, was
primarily attributable to a $4.6 million increase in
transcription services related to our healthcare information
management solutions, a $3.2 million increase in
stock-based compensation and a $2.3 million increase in
Enterprise costs driven by investment in professional service
team and infrastructure which is intended to lead to future
revenue contribution. The increase in stock-based compensation
expense reduced gross margin by 2.4% during the period.
The increase in cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, as
compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2010, was
primarily attributable to a $13.8 million increase in
transcription services related to our healthcare information
management solutions, a $12.3 million increase in stock-based
compensation and a $7.7 million increase in Enterprise
costs driven by investment in our professional service team and
infrastructure which is intended to lead to future revenue
contribution. The increase in stock-based compensation expense
decreased gross margins by 3.0% during the period.
Cost of
Maintenance and Support Revenue
Cost of maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of
compensation for product support personnel and overhead. The
following table shows cost of maintenance and support revenue,
in dollars and as a percentage of maintenance and support
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
26.6
|
|
|
$
|
23.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of maintenance and support revenue for the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to
the same periods in 2010, was primarily due to higher volumes of
Enterprise application maintenance and support.
31
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries,
benefits and overhead relating to engineering staff. The
following table shows research and development expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total research and development expense
|
|
$
|
42.2
|
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
129.9
|
|
|
$
|
113.8
|
|
|
$
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in research and development expense for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to an
increase of $6.0 million in compensation expense including a
$3.0 million increase in stock-based compensation expense.
The increase in expenses was offset by reimbursement of
$4.6 million under a new collaboration agreement signed
during the period.
The increase in research and development expense for the nine
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months
ended June 30, 2010, was attributable to increase in
compensation expense including an $11.5 million increase in
stock-based compensation, driven by headcount growth and
investment in the research and development organization. This
increase in expense was offset by reimbursement of
$4.6 million under a new collaboration agreement signed
during the period.
Sales and
Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and benefits,
commissions, advertising, direct mail, public relations,
tradeshow costs and other costs of marketing programs, travel
expenses associated with our sales organization and overhead.
The following table shows sales and marketing expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
73.3
|
|
|
$
|
67.2
|
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
225.8
|
|
|
$
|
196.7
|
|
|
$
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales and marketing expense for the three months
ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to a
$3.4 million increase in compensation expense as well as a
$2.0 million increase in marketing and channel program
spending intended to drive overall revenue growth.
The increase in sales and marketing expense for the nine months
ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to a
$14.6 million increase in marketing and channel program
spending to drive overall revenue growth, as well as an
$11.8 million increase in compensation expense. The
increase in compensation expense was attributable to additional
headcount as well as an increase of $2.9 million in
stock-based compensation.
General
and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense primarily consists of
personnel costs for administration, finance, human resources,
information systems, facilities and general management, fees for
external professional advisors
32
including accountants and attorneys, insurance, and provisions
for doubtful accounts. The following table shows general and
administrative expense, in dollars and as a percentage of total
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total general and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
$
|
29.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
104.3
|
|
|
$
|
88.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in general and administrative expense for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to a
$3.7 million increase in compensation expense including a
$1.4 million increase in stock-based compensation and a
$3.1 million increase in legal and professional expenses.
The increase in general and administrative expense for the nine
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months
ended June 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to a
$12.0 million increase in compensation expense, including
an $8.9 million increase in stock-based compensation and a
$3.5 million increase in legal and professional expenses
Amortization
of Intangible Assets
Amortization of acquired patents and core and completed
technology are included in cost of revenue and the amortization
of acquired customer and contractual relationships, non-compete
agreements, acquired tradenames and trademarks, and other
intangibles are included in operating expenses. Customer
relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis based upon
the pattern in which the economic benefits of the customer
relationships are being realized. Other identifiable intangible
assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives. Amortization expense was recorded as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
$
|
35.1
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense
|
|
$
|
34.1
|
|
|
$
|
33.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
105.7
|
|
|
$
|
100.9
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in amortization of intangible assets for the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the
same periods in 2010, was primarily attributable to the
amortization of acquired intangible assets from our business
acquisitions during fiscal 2010 and 2011 and our acquisitions of
patents and technology from other third-parties during fiscal
2010. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in
amortization of customer relationships that are recognized over
the period of the expected economic benefit.
Acquisition-Related
Costs, Net
Acquisition-related costs include those costs related to
business and other acquisitions, including potential
acquisitions. These costs consist of transition and integration
costs, including retention payments, transitional employee costs
and earn-out payments treated as compensation expense, as well
as the costs of integration-related services provided by
third-parties; professional service fees, including direct
third-party costs of the transaction and post-acquisition legal
and other professional service fees associated with disputes and
regulatory matters related to acquired entities; and adjustments
to acquisition-related items that are required to be marked to
fair value each
33
reporting period, such as contingent consideration, and other
items related to acquisitions for which the measurement period
has ended. Acquisition-related costs were recorded as follows
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Transition and integration costs
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(88.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
|
$
|
(10.6
|
)
|
|
|
(87.6
|
)%
|
Professional service fees
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
151.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(25.5
|
)%
|
Acquisition-related adjustments
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1,400.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
|
$
|
26.9
|
|
|
$
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
(48.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in acquisition-related costs, net for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2010, was primarily driven by a reduction in
transition and integration costs offset by an increase in
professional service fees. For the three months ended
June 30, 2010, transition and integration costs consisted
primarily of costs associated with transitional employees from
our acquisitions of SpinVox and eCopy. For the three months
ended June 30, 2011, professional service fees consisted of
expenses related to our third quarter 2011 acquisitions.
The decrease for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, as
compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2010, was
primarily driven by a reduction in transition and integration
costs and professional services fees. For the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, transition and integration costs consisted
primarily of the costs associated with transitional employees
from our acquisitions of SpinVox and eCopy; professional
services consisted of expenses related to our acquisition of
SpinVox in December 2009 and approximately $2.2 million
that had been capitalized as of September 30, 2009 related
to transaction costs incurred in prior periods that was required
to be expensed upon our adoption of ASC 805, Business
Combinations, in fiscal 2010.
Restructuring
and Other Charges, Net
The following table sets forth the activity relating to the
restructuring accruals for the nine months ended June 30,
2011 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded net
restructuring and other charges of $5.6 million, which
included $3.9 million of severance and other costs related
to the elimination of approximately 90 personnel across
multiple functions worldwide, primarily within costs of sales,
and $1.5 million related to facilities that we no longer
occupy.
34
Other
Income (Expense), Net
The following table shows other income (expense), net in dollars
and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
250.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
175.0
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
(26.8
|
)
|
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(94.5
|
)%
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(16.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
79.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
(15.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest expense for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010,
was driven by decreased interest costs as a result of lower
rates on our outstanding variable rate borrowings. Included in
other income (expense), net for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2011, are gains of $0.4 million and
$10.8 million, respectively, on our security price
guarantee derivatives.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The following table shows the provision for income taxes and the
effective income tax rate (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
18.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
5,966.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
28.4
|
|
|
$
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
270.1
|
%
|
Income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
$
|
(23.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
(25.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,400.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(15.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
(433.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(128.3
|
)%
|
|
|
608.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(26.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in the effective tax rate and the decrease in the
income tax provision, was primarily related to a one-time tax
benefit recorded in connection with the Equitrac acquisition for
which a net deferred tax liability was recorded in purchase
accounting releasing the valuation reserve, resulting in the
recognition of a tax benefit for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2011. This tax benefit was offset by the tax
provision on U.S. profits in the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2011.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $447.0 million as of
June 30, 2011, a decrease of $69.6 million as compared
to $516.6 million as of September 30, 2010. Our
working capital was $354.1 million as of June 30,
2011, as compared to $459.2 million as of
September 30, 2010. Cash and marketable securities held by
our international operations totaled $89.3 million and
$40.5 million at June 30, 2011 and September 30,
2010, respectively. We expect the cash held overseas will
continue to be used for our international operations and
therefore do not anticipate repatriating these funds. If we were
to repatriate these funds, we do not believe that the amount of
withholding taxes payable as a result would have a material
impact to our liquidity. As of June 30, 2011, our total
accumulated deficit was $238.0 million. We do not expect
our accumulated deficit to impact our future ability to operate
the business given our strong cash and operating cash flow
positions, and believe our current cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities on-hand are sufficient to meet our
operating needs for at least the next twelve months.
35
Cash
Provided by Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended
June 30, 2011 was $259.5 million, an increase of
$74.8 million, or 40.5%, as compared to cash provided by
operating activities of $184.7 million for the nine months
ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily driven by
the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $72.3 million in cash flows resulting from
an increase in net income, exclusive of non-cash adjustment
items which include a one-time non-cash tax benefit adjustment
of $34.7 million reducing the valuation allowance on
deferred tax assets as a result of the Equitrac acquisition;
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash flows of $13.6 million from an overall
increase in deferred revenue; and
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $11.0 million in cash flows generated by
changes in working capital excluding deferred revenue, primarily
driven by a 18.0 million ($23.4 million
equivalent) payment in fiscal 2011 for a fixed obligation
assumed in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox, offset by
an increase of $9.3 million due to changes in accounts
receivable.
|
Cash Used
in Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended
June 30, 2011 was $331.2 million, an increase of
$107.1 million, or 47.8%, as compared to cash used in
investing activities of $224.1 million for the nine months
ended June 30, 2010. The net increase was primarily driven
by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash outflows of $319.3 million as a result of our third
quarter fiscal 2011 acquisitions. During the nine months ended
June 30, 2010 cash outflows for acquisitions were
$155.9 million, primarily related to the acquisition of
SpinVox and the PSRS deferred acquisition payments.
|
|
|
|
A cash inflow of $17.2 million in restricted cash in
December 2010 related to the release of cash placed in an
irrevocable standby letter of credit account for payment of a
fixed obligation in connection with our acquisition of
SpinVox; and
|
|
|
|
A use of $15.0 million for a cash payment to acquire an
equity investment in a non-public company during the six months
ended March 31, 2010.
|
Cash Used
in/Provided by Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended
June 30, 2011 was $4.3 million as compared to cash
provided by financing activities of $9.8 million for the
nine months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease in cash flows
of $14.2 million or 144.1%. The change was primarily driven
by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash used to net share settle employee equity
awards of $12.0 million, due to an increase in intrinsic
value of the shares vested as a result of the overall increase
in our stock price and vesting activities during the nine months
ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010;
and
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $12.4 million in proceeds from the issuance
of common stock relating to the warrant that was exercised
during the nine months ended June 30, 2010; offset by
|
|
|
|
An $8.2 million cash benefit resulting from excess tax
benefits on employee equity awards during the nine months ended
June 30, 2011.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
We have $250 million of 2.75% convertible senior debentures
due in August 2027. As of June 30, 2011, no conversion
triggers were met. If the conversion triggers were met, we could
be required to repay all or some of the principal amount in cash
prior to maturity.
36
Credit
Facility
As of June 30, 2011, $638.5 million remained
outstanding under our term loan. There were $15.7 million
of letters of credit issued under the revolving credit line and
there were no other outstanding borrowings under the revolving
credit line. As of June 30, 2011, we are in compliance with
the covenants under the Credit Facility.
As of June 30, 2011, based on our leverage ratio, the
applicable margin for our term loan was 0.75% for base rate
borrowings and 1.75% for LIBOR-based borrowings. This results in
an effective interest rate of 1.95%. No payments under the
excess cash flow sweep provision were due in the first quarter
of fiscal 2011 as no excess cash flow, as defined, was generated
in fiscal 2010. At the current time, we are unable to predict
the amount of the outstanding principal, if any, that we may be
required to repay in future fiscal years pursuant to the excess
cash flow sweep provisions.
In July 2011, we entered in to agreements to amend and restate
our existing Credit Facility. Of the approximately
$638.5 million remaining Term Loan originally due
March 31, 2013, lenders representing $486.9 million
have elected to extend the maturity date three years to
March 31, 2016. The remaining $151.6 million in term
loans are due March 2013. In addition, lenders participating in
the revolving credit facility have chosen to extend the maturity
date by three years to March 31, 2015.
In conjunction with the amendment, the Credit Facility repayment
terms were amended. Principal is due in four quarterly
installments of 1% per annum through the original maturity date
of March 2013, at which time the principal remaining on the
unextended portion of the loans becomes payable. The table below
details the new schedule of principal payments by fiscal year.
If only the minimum required repayments are made, the annual
aggregate principal amount of the term loans repaid would be as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011 (quarter ending September 30)
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,346
|
|
2013
|
|
|
154,494
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,743
|
|
2015
|
|
|
4,696
|
|
2016
|
|
|
466,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
638,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under terms of the amendment, borrowings under the Credit
Facility bear interest at a rate equal to the applicable margin
plus, at our option, either (a) the base rate which is the
higher of the corporate base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or
the federal funds rate plus 0.50% per annum or (b) LIBOR
(equal to (i) the British Bankers Association
Interest Settlement Rates for deposits in U.S. dollars
divided by (ii) one minus the statutory reserves applicable
to such borrowing). The applicable margin for the borrowings is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Base Rate Margin
|
|
LIBOR Margin
|
|
Term loans due March 2013
|
|
0.75% - 1.50%(a)
|
|
1.75% - 2.50%(a)
|
Term loans due March 2016
|
|
2.00%
|
|
3.00%
|
Revolving facility due March 2015
|
|
1.25% - 2.25%(b)
|
|
2.25% - 3.25%(b)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The margin is determined based on our leverage ratio at the date
the interest rates are reset on the Term Loans. |
|
(b) |
|
The margin is determined based on our credit rating at the date
the interest rates are reset on the Revolving Loans |
We believe that cash flows from future operations in addition to
cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities on-hand will
be sufficient to meet our working capital, investing, financing
and contractual obligations and the contingent payments for
acquisitions, if any are realized, as they become due for at
least the next twelve months. We also believe that in the event
future operating results are not as planned, that we could take
actions, including restructuring actions and other cost
reduction initiatives, to reduce operating expenses to levels
which, in combination with expected future revenue, will
continue to generate sufficient operating cash flow. In the
event that these actions are not effective in generating
operating cash flows we may be required to issue equity or debt
securities on terms that may be less favorable.
37
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations
Contractual
Obligations
The following table outlines our contractual payment obligations
as of June 30, 2011 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
and 2014
|
|
|
and 2016
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible Senior Debentures(1)
|
|
$
|
250.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
250.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Credit Facility(2)
|
|
|
638.5
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
159.2
|
|
|
|
471.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on Credit Facility(2)
|
|
|
77.7
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on 2.75% Convertible Senior Debentures(3)
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter of credit(4)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligations and other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
128.7
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
Other lease obligations associated with the closing of duplicate
facilities related to restructurings and acquisitions
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension, minimum funding requirement(5)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration agreements(6)
|
|
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities assumed(7)
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
1,231.2
|
|
|
$
|
46.1
|
|
|
$
|
95.3
|
|
|
$
|
532.5
|
|
|
$
|
532.6
|
|
|
$
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Holders of the 2.75% Senior Convertible Debentures have the
right to require us to repurchase the debentures on
August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest is due and payable monthly under the Credit Facility,
and principal is paid on a quarterly basis. The amounts included
as interest payable in this table are based on the effective
interest rate related to the July 2011 amended Credit Facility. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest is due and payable semi-annually under the 2.75%
convertible senior debentures. |
|
(4) |
|
We have placed EUR 5.0 million ($7.2 million based on
the June 30, 2011 exchange rates) in an irrevocable standby
letter of credit account for payment of a fixed obligation
assumed in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox. |
|
(5) |
|
Our U.K. pension plan has a minimum funding requirement of
£859,900 ($1.4 million based on the exchange rate at
June 30, 2011) for each of the next 4 years,
through fiscal 2014. |
|
(6) |
|
Payments under the research collaboration agreements are payable
in cash or common stock at our option. |
|
(7) |
|
Obligations include assumed long-term liabilities related to
restructuring programs initiated by the predecessor entities
prior to our acquisition of SpeechWorks International, Inc. in
August 2003, and our acquisition of the former Nuance
Communications, Inc. in September 2005. These restructuring
programs relate to the closing of two facilities with lease
terms set to expire in 2016 and 2012. Total contractual
obligations under these two leases are $24.6 million. As of
June 30, 2011, we have
sub-leased a
portion of the office space related to these two facilities to
unrelated third parties. Total sublease income under the
remaining contractual terms is expected to be $9.1 million,
which ranges from $1.5 million to $4.1 million on an
annualized basis through 2016. |
The gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of
June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010
was$13.4 million and $12.8 million, respectively. We
do not expect a significant change in the amount of unrecognized
tax benefits within the next 12 months. We estimate that
none of this amount will be paid within the next year and we are
currently unable to reasonably estimate the timing of payments
for the remainder of the liability.
38
Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have agreed
to make contingent cash payments to the former shareholders of
certain of the acquired companies. The following represents the
contingent cash payments that we may be required to make.
In connection with our acquisition of SNAPin Software, Inc.
(SNAPin), we agreed to make a contingent earn-out
payment of up to $45.0 million in cash to be paid, if at
all, based on the business achieving certain performance targets
that are measurable from the acquisition date to
December 31, 2009. In April 2010, the Company and the
former shareholders of SNAPin agreed on a final earn-out payment
of $21.2 million and we issued 593,676 shares of our
common stock, valued at $10.2 million, as our first payment
under the earn-out agreement. The remaining balance is payable
in cash or stock, solely at our option, on or before
October 1, 2011 and is included in short-term liabilities
as of June 30, 2011.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, Inc.
(Vocada) in November 2007, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $21.0 million upon
the achievement of certain financial targets measured over
defined periods through December 31, 2010, in accordance
with the merger agreement. We have notified the former
shareholders of Vocada that the financial targets were not
achieved. In December 2010, the former shareholders filed a
demand for arbitration in accordance with their rights under the
merger agreement. At June 30, 2011, we have not recorded
any obligation relative to these earn-out provisions.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Through June 30, 2011, we have not entered into any
off-balance sheet arrangements or material transactions with
unconsolidated entities or other persons.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
(GAAP) require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments, including
those related to: revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful
accounts and returns; the costs to complete the development of
custom software applications; the valuation of goodwill,
intangible assets and tangible long-lived assets; accounting for
business combinations; share-based payments; valuation of
derivative instruments; accounting for income taxes and related
valuation allowances and loss contingencies. Our management
bases its estimates on historical experience, market participant
fair value considerations and various other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
Information about those accounting policies we deem to be
critical to our financial reporting may be found in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. There have
been no significant changes or additions to our critical
accounting policies from those disclosed in our annual report
other than those changes in our policies for the adoption of new
revenue accounting standards, as described in Note 2 to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements included in
Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Refer to Note 2 to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices which could
affect operating results, financial position and cash flows. We
manage our exposure to these market risks through our regular
operating and financing activities and, when appropriate,
through the use of derivative financial instruments.
39
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Any foreign currency transaction, defined as a transaction
denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, will
be reported in U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange
rate. Assets and liabilities are translated into
U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date and income and expense items are translated at
average rates for the period. The primary foreign currency
denominated transactions include revenue and expenses and the
resulting accounts receivable and accounts payable balances
reflected on our balance sheet. Therefore, the change in the
value of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies
will have either a positive or negative effect on our financial
position and results of operations. Historically, our primary
exposure has related to transactions denominated in the euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Indian Rupee and
Hungarian Forint.
A hypothetical change of 10% in appreciation or depreciation in
foreign currency exchange rates from the quoted foreign currency
exchange rates at June 30, 2011 would not have a material
impact on our revenue, operating results or cash flows in the
coming year.
Periodically, we enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge
against foreign currency fluctuations. These contracts may or
may not be designated as cash flow hedges for accounting
purposes. At June 30, 2011, we have foreign currency
contracts with a total notional value of approximately
$2.2 million designated as cash flow hedges. These
contracts all mature within the next twelve months. During the
nine months ended June 30, 2011, we commenced a program
that primarily utilizes forward currency contracts to offset the
risks associated with foreign currency denominated assets and
liabilities. We established this program so that gains and
losses from remeasurement or settlement of these assets and
liabilities are offset by gain or losses on the foreign currency
forward contracts thus mitigating the risks and volatility
associated with our foreign currency transactions. These
contracts are not designated as accounting hedges and generally
are for periods of 30 days or less. The notional contract
amount of outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts not
designated as cash flow hedges was $165.4 million at
June 30, 2011. Based on the nature of the transaction for
which the contracts were purchased, a hypothetical change of 10%
in exchange rates would not have a material impact on our
financial results.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our
significant cash and cash equivalents, and the outstanding debt
under the Credit Facility.
At June 30, 2011, we held approximately $447.0 million
of cash and cash equivalents primarily consisting of cash, time
deposits and money-market funds. Due to the low current market
yields and the short-term nature of our investments, a
hypothetical change in market rates of one percentage point
would not have a material effect on the fair value of our
portfolio or results of operations.
At June 30, 2011, our total outstanding debt balance
exposed to variable interest rates was $638.5 million. A
hypothetical change in market rates could have a significant
impact on interest expense and amounts payable. Assuming a one
percentage point increase in interest rates, our interest
expense relative to our outstanding debt would increase
$6.4 million per annum.
Equity
Price Risk
We are exposed to equity price risk as a result of security
price guarantees that we enter in to from time to time.
Generally, these price guarantees are for a period of six months
or less, and require payment from either us to a third party, or
from the third party to us, based upon changes in our stock
price during the contract term. As of June 30, 2011, we had
security price guarantees on approximately 250,000 of our shares
with prices between $19.55 and $20.28. A change of 10% in our
stock price during the next six months would not have a material
effect on our results of operations or our cash flows.
40
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a
system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act)) designed to ensure that information we are required
to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
issuers management, including its principal executive
officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers,
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision
of, and with the participation of, management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to meet the requirements of
Rule 13a-15
under the Exchange Act.
Changes
in internal control over financial reporting
There were no changes to our internal controls over financial
reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required
by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15
or 15d-15
that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II.
Other Information
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
This information is included in Note 18, Commitments and
Contingencies, in the accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements and is incorporated herein by reference
from Item 1 of Part I.
You should carefully consider the risks described below when
evaluating our company and when deciding whether to invest in
our company. The risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we do not currently believe are
important to an investor may also harm our business operations.
If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions
described in the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or our results of operations could be
seriously harmed. If that happens, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of the
value of any of our shares held by you.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to
period, and this may cause our stock price to
decline.
Our revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past
and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. Given
this fluctuation, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons
of revenue and operating results are not necessarily meaningful
or an accurate indicator of our future performance. As a result,
our results of operations may not meet the expectations of
securities analysts or investors in the future. If this occurs,
the price of our stock would likely decline. Factors that
contribute to fluctuations in operating results include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
slowing sales by our distribution and fulfillment partners to
their customers, which may place pressure on these partners to
reduce purchases of our products;
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
volume, timing and fulfillment of customer orders;
|
|
|
|
our efforts to generate additional revenue from our intellectual
property portfolio;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying their purchasing decisions in anticipation of
new versions of our products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying, canceling or limiting their purchases as a
result of the threat or results of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
seasonality in purchasing patterns of our customers;
|
|
|
|
reduction in the prices of our products in response to
competition, market conditions or contractual obligations;
|
|
|
|
returns and allowance charges in excess of accrued amounts;
|
|
|
|
timing of significant marketing and sales promotions;
|
|
|
|
impairment charges against goodwill and intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
delayed realization of synergies resulting from our acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
write-offs of excess or obsolete inventory and accounts
receivable that are not collectible;
|
|
|
|
increased expenditures incurred pursuing new product or market
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends as they affect retail and corporate
sales; and
|
|
|
|
higher than anticipated costs related to fixed-price contracts
with our customers.
|
Due to the foregoing factors, among others, our revenue and
operating results are difficult to forecast. Our expense levels
are based in significant part on our expectations of future
revenue and we may not be able to reduce our expenses quickly to
respond to a shortfall in projected revenue. Therefore, our
failure to meet revenue expectations would seriously harm our
operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We
have grown, and may continue to grow, through acquisitions,
which could dilute our existing stockholders.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. In connection with past acquisitions, we issued a
substantial number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration and also incurred significant debt to finance the
cash consideration used for our acquisitions. We may continue to
issue equity securities for future acquisitions, which would
dilute existing stockholders, perhaps significantly depending on
the terms of such acquisitions. We may also incur additional
debt in connection with future acquisitions, which, if available
at all, may place additional restrictions on our ability to
operate our business.
Our
ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions
will depend on successfully integrating the acquired
businesses.
Our prior acquisitions required, and our recently completed
acquisitions continue to require, substantial integration and
management efforts and we expect future acquisitions to require
similar efforts. Acquisitions of this nature involve a number of
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty in transitioning and integrating the operations and
personnel of the acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulty in successfully implementing, upgrading and
deploying in a timely and effective manner new operational
information systems and upgrades of our finance, accounting and
product distribution systems;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into
our products and technology;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulties in completing projects associated with
in-process research and development;
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired
development projects and technology integration;
|
|
|
|
management of geographically remote business units both in the
United States and internationally;
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with partners and customers;
|
|
|
|
assumption of unknown material liabilities of acquired companies;
|
|
|
|
accurate projection of revenue plans of the acquired entity in
the due diligence process;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying purchases of our products pending resolution
of product integration between our existing and our newly
acquired products;
|
|
|
|
entering markets or types of businesses in which we have limited
experience; and
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of the acquired business.
|
As a result of these and other risks, if we are unable to
successfully integrate acquired businesses, we may not realize
the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. Any failure to
achieve these benefits or failure to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies could seriously harm our
business.
Accounting
treatment of our acquisitions could decrease our net income or
expected revenue in the foreseeable future, which could have a
material and adverse effect on the market value of our common
stock.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, we record the market value of our common
stock or other form of consideration issued in connection with
the acquisition and, for transactions which closed prior to
October 1, 2009, the amount of direct transaction costs as
the cost of acquiring the company or business. We have allocated
that cost to the individual assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, including various identifiable intangible assets such
as acquired technology, acquired tradenames and acquired
customer relationships based on their respective fair values.
Intangible assets are generally amortized over a five to ten
year period. Goodwill and certain intangible assets with
indefinite lives, are not subject to amortization but are
subject to an impairment analysis, at least annually, which may
result in an impairment charge if the carrying value exceeds its
implied fair value. As of June 30, 2011, we had identified
intangible assets of approximately $757.6 million, net of
accumulated amortization, and goodwill of approximately
$2.3 billion. In addition, purchase accounting limits our
ability to recognize certain revenue that otherwise would have
been recognized by the acquired company as an independent
business. As a result, the combined company may delay revenue
recognition or recognize less revenue than we and the acquired
company would have recognized as independent companies.
Our
significant debt could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our credit
facility and our convertible debentures.
We have a significant amount of debt. As of June 30, 2011,
we had a total of $889.1 million of gross debt outstanding,
including $151.6 million in term loans due in March 2013,
$486.9 million in term loans due in March 2016 under an
amended and restated agreement signed in July 2012, and
$250.0 million in convertible debentures which investors
may require us to redeem in August 2014. We also have a
$75.0 million revolving credit line available to us through
March 2015. As of June 30, 2011, there were
$15.7 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line but there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line. Our debt level could
have important consequences, for example it could:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to use a large portion of our cash flow to pay
principal and interest on debt, including the convertible
debentures and the credit facility, which will reduce the
availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, research and development
expenditures and other business activities;
|
|
|
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting
business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants
related to our debt, our ability to borrow additional funds,
dispose of assets or pay cash dividends.
|
Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations under our
debt instruments depends on our ability to generate significant
cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and
regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our
control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate
cash flow from operations, or that additional capital will be
available to us, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet
our payment obligations under the convertible debentures and our
other debt and to fund other liquidity needs. If we are not able
to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt
obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt,
including the convertible debentures, sell assets, reduce or
delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital.
If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives,
we may not be able to meet our payment obligations under the
convertible debentures and our other debt.
In addition, a substantial portion of our debt bears interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, our debt
service requirements will increase, which would adversely affect
our results of operations and cash flows.
Our
debt agreements contain covenant restrictions that may limit our
ability to operate our business.
The agreement governing our senior credit facility contains, and
any of our other future debt agreements may contain, covenant
restrictions that limit our ability to operate our business,
including restrictions on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt or issue guarantees;
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain investments;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with our affiliates;
|
|
|
|
sell certain assets;
|
|
|
|
redeem capital stock or make other restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
declare or pay dividends or make other distributions to
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any entity.
|
Our ability to comply with these covenants is dependent on our
future performance, which will be subject to many factors, some
of which are beyond our control, including prevailing economic
conditions. As a result of these covenants, our ability to
respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to
obtain additional financing, if needed, may be significantly
restricted, and we may be prevented from engaging in
transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. In
addition, our failure to comply with these covenants could
result in a default under our debt agreements, which could
permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the
debt. If any of our debt is accelerated, we may not have
sufficient funds available to repay the accelerated debt.
We
have a history of operating losses, and may incur losses in the
future, which may require us to raise additional capital on
unfavorable terms.
We reported net losses of $19.1 million, $19.4 million
and $37.0 million for the fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. If we are unable to achieve and maintain
profitability, the market price for our stock may decline,
perhaps substantially. We cannot assure you that our revenue
will grow or that we will achieve or maintain profitability in
the future. If we do not achieve and maintain profitability, we
may be required to raise additional capital to maintain or grow
our operations. Additional capital, if available at all, may be
highly dilutive to existing investors or contain other
unfavorable terms, such as a high interest rate and restrictive
covenants.
Voice
and language technologies may not achieve widespread acceptance,
which could limit our ability to grow our voice and language
business.
We have invested and expect to continue to invest heavily in the
acquisition, development and marketing of voice and language
technologies. The market for voice and language technologies is
relatively new and rapidly
44
evolving. Our ability to increase revenue in the future depends
in large measure on the acceptance of these technologies in
general and our products in particular. The continued
development of the market for our current and future voice and
language solutions will also depend on:
|
|
|
|
|
consumer and business demand for speech-enabled applications;
|
|
|
|
development by third-party vendors of applications using voice
and language technologies; and
|
|
|
|
continuous improvement in voice and language technology.
|
Sales of our voice and language products would be harmed if the
market for these technologies does not continue to develop or
develops slower than we expect, and, consequently, our business
could be harmed and we may not recover the costs associated with
our investment in these technologies.
The
markets in which we operate are highly competitive and rapidly
changing and we may be unable to compete
successfully.
There are a number of companies that develop or may develop
products that compete in our targeted markets. The individual
markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and are
rapidly changing. Within voice and language, we compete with
AT&T, Microsoft, Google, and other smaller providers.
Within healthcare, we compete with Medquist and other smaller
providers. Within imaging, we compete with ABBYY, Adobe,
I.R.I.S. and NewSoft. In voice and language, some of our
partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Edify, Genesys and Nortel develop
and market products that can be considered substitutes for our
solutions. In addition, a number of smaller companies in voice,
language and imaging produce technologies or products that are
in some markets competitive with our solutions. Current and
potential competitors have established, or may establish,
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties
to increase the ability of their technologies to address the
needs of our prospective customers.
The competition in these markets could adversely affect our
operating results by reducing the volume of the products we
license or the prices we can charge. Some of our current or
potential competitors, such as Adobe, Microsoft and Google, have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. These competitors may be able to respond
more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or
changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we do.
Some of our customers, such as Microsoft and Google, have
developed or acquired products or technologies that compete with
our products and technologies. These customers may give higher
priority to the sale of these competitive products or
technologies. To the extent they do so, market acceptance and
penetration of our products, and therefore our revenue, may be
adversely affected. Our success will depend substantially upon
our ability to enhance our products and technologies and to
develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new
products and features that meet changing customer requirements
and incorporate technological enhancements. If we are unable to
develop new products and enhance functionalities or technologies
to adapt to these changes, or if we are unable to realize
synergies among our acquired products and technologies, our
business will suffer.
The
failure to successfully maintain the adequacy of our system of
internal control over financial reporting could have a material
adverse impact on our ability to report our financial results in
an accurate and timely manner.
The SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring public companies to include
a report of management on internal control over financial
reporting in their annual reports on
Form 10-K
that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition,
our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to
and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting. Any failure in the effectiveness of our
system of internal control over financial reporting could have a
material adverse impact on our ability to report our financial
statements in an accurate and timely manner, could subject us to
regulatory actions, civil or criminal penalties, shareholder
litigation, or loss of customer confidence, which could result
in an adverse reaction in the financial
45
marketplace due to a loss of investor confidence in the
reliability of our financial statements, which ultimately could
negatively impact our stock price.
A
significant portion of our revenue is derived, and a significant
portion of our research and development activities are based,
outside the United States. Our results could be harmed by
economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with
these international regions.
Because we operate worldwide, our business is subject to risks
associated with doing business internationally. We anticipate
that revenue from international operations could increase in the
future. Most of our international revenue is generated by sales
in Europe and Asia. In addition, some of our products are
developed and manufactured outside the United States and we have
a large number of employees in India that provide transcription
services. A significant portion of the development and
manufacturing of our voice and language products is conducted in
Belgium and Canada, and a significant portion of our imaging
research and development is conducted in Hungary. We also have
significant research and development resources in Aachen,
Germany, and Vienna, Austria. Accordingly, our future results
could be harmed by a variety of factors associated with
international sales and operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions economic
conditions;
|
|
|
|
geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism and war;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements imposed by the United States or by other countries;
|
|
|
|
compliance with foreign and domestic laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
negative consequences from changes in applicable tax laws;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing operations in multiple
locations in many countries;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting trade accounts receivable in other
countries; and
|
|
|
|
less effective protection of intellectual property than in the
United States.
|
We are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Because we have international subsidiaries and distributors that
operate and sell our products outside the United States, we are
exposed to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. In certain circumstances, we have entered into forward
exchange contracts to hedge against foreign currency
fluctuations. We use these contracts to reduce our risk
associated with exchange rate movements, as the gains or losses
on these contracts are intended to offset any exchange rate
losses or gains on the hedged transaction. We do not engage in
foreign currency speculation. Forward exchange contracts hedging
firm commitments qualify for hedge accounting when they are
designated as a hedge of the foreign currency exposure and they
are effective in minimizing such exposure. With our increased
international presence in a number of geographic locations and
with international revenue and costs projected to increase, we
are exposed to changes in foreign currencies including the euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Indian Rupee,
Singapore Dollar, Australian Dollar, Chinese Yuan, Israel
Shekel, and the Hungarian Forint. Changes in the value of the
euro or other foreign currencies relative to the value of the
U.S. dollar could adversely affect future revenue and
operating results.
Impairment
of our intangible assets could result in significant charges
that would adversely impact our future operating
results.
We have significant intangible assets, including goodwill and
intangibles with indefinite lives, which are susceptible to
valuation adjustments as a result of changes in various factors
or conditions. The most significant intangible assets are
patents and core technology, completed technology, customer
relationships and trademarks. Customer relationships are
amortized on an accelerated basis based upon the pattern in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are being
utilized. Other identifiable intangible assets are amortized on
a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We
assess the potential impairment of identifiable intangible
assets on an
46
annual basis, as well as whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment of such
assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period;
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization or management reporting structure
that could result in additional reporting units, which may
require alternative methods of estimating fair values or greater
disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by reporting
unit; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact our
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified.
Our
sales to government clients subject us to risks, including early
termination, audits, investigations, sanctions and
penalties.
We derive a portion of our revenues from contracts with the
United States government, as well as various state and local
governments, and their respective agencies. Government contracts
are generally subject to audits and investigations which could
identify violations of these agreements. Government contract
violations could result in a range of consequences including,
but not limited to, contract price adjustments, civil and
criminal penalties, contract termination, forfeiture of profit
and/or
suspension of payment, and suspension or debarment from future
government contracts. We could also suffer serious harm to our
reputation if we were found to have violated the terms of our
government contracts.
We conducted an analysis of our compliance with the terms and
conditions of certain contracts with the U.S. General
Services Administration (GSA). Based upon our
analysis, we voluntarily notified GSA of non-compliance with the
terms of two contracts. The final resolution of this matter may
adversely impact our financial position.
If we
are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business
could be harmed.
If any of our key employees were to leave, we could face
substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could
experience a loss in productivity while any successor obtains
the necessary training and experience. Our employment
relationships are generally at-will and we have had key
employees leave in the past. We cannot assure you that one or
more key employees will not leave in the future. We intend to
continue to hire additional highly qualified personnel,
including software engineers and operational personnel, but may
not be able to attract, assimilate or retain qualified personnel
in the future. Any failure to attract, integrate, motivate and
retain these employees could harm our business.
Our
medical transcription services may be subject to legal claims
for failure to comply with laws governing the confidentiality of
medical records.
Healthcare professionals who use our medical transcription
services deliver to us health information about their patients
including information that constitutes a record under applicable
law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal
and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual
obligations govern collection, dissemination, use and
confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws;
|
|
|
|
our contracts with customers and partners;
|
|
|
|
state laws regulating healthcare professionals;
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
Medicaid laws; and
|
|
|
|
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing
Administration.
|
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal
privacy and security standards for the use and protection of
protected health information. Any failure by us or by our
personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may
result in a material liability. Although we have systems and
policies in place for safeguarding protected health information
from unauthorized disclosure, these systems and policies may not
preclude claims against us for alleged violations of applicable
requirements. There can be no assurance that we will not be
subject to liability claims that could have a material adverse
affect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Adverse
changes in general economic or political conditions in any of
the major countries in which we do business could adversely
affect our operating results.
As our business has grown, we have become increasingly subject
to the risks arising from adverse changes in domestic and global
economic and political conditions. For example, the direction
and relative strength of the U.S. and global economies have
recently been increasingly uncertain due to softness in housing
markets, extreme volatility in security prices, severely
diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades
of certain investments and declining valuations of others and
continuing geopolitical uncertainties. If economic growth in the
United States and other countries in which we do business is
slowed, customers may delay or reduce technology purchases and
may be unable to obtain credit to finance the purchase of our
products. This could result in reduced sales of our products,
longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and
increased price competition. Any of these events would likely
harm our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Political instability in any of the major countries
in which we do business would also likely harm our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Current
uncertainty in the global financial markets and the global
economy may negatively affect our financial
results.
Current uncertainty in the global financial markets and economy
may negatively affect our financial results. These macroeconomic
developments could negatively affect our business, operating
results or financial condition in a number of ways which, in
turn, could adversely affect our stock price. A prolonged period
of economic decline could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition and exacerbate
some of the other risk factors described herein. Our customers
may defer purchases of our products, licenses, and services in
response to tighter credit and negative financial news or reduce
their demand for them. Our customers may also not be able to
obtain adequate access to credit, which could affect their
ability to make timely payments to us or ultimately cause the
customer to file for protection from creditors under applicable
insolvency or bankruptcy laws. If our customers are not able to
make timely payments to us, our accounts receivable could
increase.
Our investment portfolio, which includes short-term debt
securities, is generally subject to credit, liquidity,
counterparty, market and interest rate risks that may be
exacerbated by the recent global financial crisis. If the
banking system or the fixed income, credit or equity markets
deteriorate or remain volatile, our investment portfolio may be
impacted and the values and liquidity of our investments could
be adversely affected.
In addition, our operating results and financial condition could
be negatively affected if, as a result of economic conditions,
either:
|
|
|
|
|
the demand for, and prices of, our products, licenses, or
services are reduced as a result of actions by our competitors
or otherwise; or
|
|
|
|
our financial counterparties or other contractual counterparties
are unable to, or do not, meet their contractual commitments to
us.
|
48
Security
and privacy breaches in our systems may damage client relations
and inhibit our growth.
The uninterrupted operation of our hosted solutions and the
confidentiality and security of third-party information is
critical to our business. Any failures in our security and
privacy measures could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position and results of operations. If we are unable
to protect, or our clients perceive that we are unable to
protect, the security and privacy of our electronic information,
our growth could be materially adversely affected. A security or
privacy breach may:
|
|
|
|
|
cause our clients to lose confidence in our solutions;
|
|
|
|
harm our reputation;
|
|
|
|
expose us to liability; and
|
|
|
|
increase our expenses from potential remediation costs.
|
While we believe we use proven applications designed for data
security and integrity to process electronic transactions, there
can be no assurance that our use of these applications will be
sufficient to address changing market conditions or the security
and privacy concerns of existing and potential clients.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property and Technology
Unauthorized
use of our proprietary technology and intellectual property
could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Our success and competitive position depend in large part on our
ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property rights
protecting our products and services. We rely on a combination
of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade
secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements
to establish and protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
aspects of our products or to obtain, license, sell or otherwise
use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing
unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we may not be
able to protect our technology from unauthorized use.
Additionally, our competitors may independently develop
technologies that are substantially the same or superior to our
technologies and that do not infringe our rights. In these
cases, we would be unable to prevent our competitors from
selling or licensing these similar or superior technologies. In
addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our
proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States. Although the source code for our proprietary software is
protected both as a trade secret and as a copyrighted work,
litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property
rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity
and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend
against claims of infringement or invalidity. Litigation,
regardless of the outcome, can be very expensive and can divert
management efforts.
Third
parties have claimed and may claim in the future that we are
infringing their intellectual property, and we could be exposed
to significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented
from selling our products if such claims are
successful.
From time to time, we are subject to claims that we or our
customers may be infringing or contributing to the infringement
of the intellectual property rights of others. We may be unaware
of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of
our technologies and products. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. However, we may not be able to obtain licenses from some
or all claimants, the terms of any offered licenses may not be
acceptable to us, and we may not be able to resolve disputes
without litigation. Any litigation regarding intellectual
property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert the
attention of our management and key personnel from our business
operations. In the event of a claim of intellectual property
infringement, we may be required to enter into costly royalty or
license agreements. Third parties claiming intellectual property
infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to develop and
sell our products.
49
We may
incur substantial costs enforcing or acquiring intellectual
property rights and defending against third-party claims as a
result of litigation or other proceedings.
In connection with the enforcement of our own intellectual
property rights, the acquisition of third-party intellectual
property rights, or disputes relating to the validity or alleged
infringement of third-party intellectual property rights,
including patent rights, we have been, are currently, and may in
the future be, subject to claims, negotiations or complex,
protracted litigation. Intellectual property disputes and
litigation are typically very costly and can be disruptive to
our business operations by diverting the attention and energy of
management and key technical personnel. Although we have
successfully defended or resolved past litigation and disputes,
we may not prevail in any ongoing or future litigation and
disputes. In addition, we may incur significant costs in
acquiring the necessary third party intellectual property rights
for use in our products. Third party intellectual property
disputes could subject us to significant liabilities, require us
to enter into royalty and licensing arrangements on unfavorable
terms, prevent us from manufacturing or licensing certain of our
products, cause severe disruptions to our operations or the
markets in which we compete, or require us to satisfy
indemnification commitments with our customers including
contractual provisions under various license arrangements. Any
of these could seriously harm our business.
Our
software products may have bugs, which could result in delayed
or lost revenue, expensive correction, liability to our
customers and claims against us.
Complex software products such as ours may contain errors,
defects or bugs. Defects in the solutions or products that we
develop and sell to our customers could require expensive
corrections and result in delayed or lost revenue, adverse
customer reaction and negative publicity about us or our
products and services. Customers who are not satisfied with any
of our products may also bring claims against us for damages,
which, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming to
defend, and could result in costly litigation and payment of
damages. Such claims could harm our reputation, financial
results and competitive position.
Risks
Related to our Corporate Structure, Organization and Common
Stock
The
holdings of our largest stockholder may enable it to influence
matters requiring stockholder approval.
As of June 30, 2011, Warburg Pincus, a global private
equity firm, beneficially owned approximately 23% of our
outstanding common stock, including warrants exercisable for up
to 7,562,422 shares of our common stock, and
3,562,238 shares of our outstanding Series B Preferred
Stock, each of which is convertible into one share of our common
stock. Because of its large holdings of our capital stock
relative to other stockholders, this stockholder has a strong
influence over matters requiring approval by our stockholders.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be
subject to wide fluctuations, and this may make it difficult for
you to resell the common stock when you want or at prices you
find attractive.
Our stock price historically has been, and may continue to be,
volatile. Various factors contribute to the volatility of our
stock price, including, for example, quarterly variations in our
financial results, new product introductions by us or our
competitors and general economic and market conditions. Sales of
a substantial number of shares of our common stock by our
largest stockholders, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could also contribute to the volatility or our stock
price. While we cannot predict the individual effect that these
factors may have on the market price of our common stock, these
factors, either individually or in the aggregate, could result
in significant volatility in our stock price during any given
period of time. Moreover, companies that have experienced
volatility in the market price of their stock often are subject
to securities class action litigation. If we were the subject of
such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources.
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public
disclosure may result in additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, new regulations
50
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
rules of the Nasdaq Marketplace, are resulting in increased
general and administrative expenses for companies such as ours.
These new or changed laws, regulations and standards are subject
to varying interpretations in many cases, and as a result, their
application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is
provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result
in higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure
and governance practices. We are committed to maintaining high
standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a
result, we intend to invest resources to comply with evolving
laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result
in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion
of management time and attention from revenue-generating
activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply
with new or changed laws, regulations and standards differ from
the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, our
business may be harmed.
Future
sales of our common stock in the public market could adversely
affect the trading price of our common stock and our ability to
raise funds in new stock offerings.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the
public market, or the perception that such sales could occur,
could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of our common
stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through
future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. In
connection with past acquisitions, we issued a substantial
number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration. We may continue to issue equity securities for
future acquisitions, which would dilute existing stockholders,
perhaps significantly depending on the terms of such
acquisitions. For example, we issued, and registered for resale,
approximately 2.3 million shares of our common stock in
connection with our December 2009 acquisition of SpinVox. No
prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future
sales of shares of common stock, or the availability of shares
of common stock for future sale, will have on the trading price
of our common stock.
We
have implemented anti-takeover provisions, which could
discourage or prevent a takeover, even if an acquisition would
be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
Delaware law, as well as other organizational documents could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if
doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
authorized blank check preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at meetings of our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
directors and for stockholder proposals.
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
None
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index are filed or
incorporated by reference (as stated therein) as part of this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the Town of Burlington, Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, on August 9, 2011.
Nuance Communications, Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas
L. Beaudoin
|
Thomas L. Beaudoin
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
52
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2011, by and
among Nuance, Ruetli Holding Corporation, the shareholders of
SVOX and smac partners GmbH, as the shareholder representative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 10, 2011, by
and among Nuance, Ellipse Acquisition Corporation, Equitrac
Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow agent,
and Cornerstone Equity Investors, LLC, as the stockholder
representative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
5/11/2001
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
10/19/2005
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
S-3
|
|
333-142182
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
4/18/2007
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
3/15/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Letter dated March 14, 2011 to Bill Nelson regarding
certain employment matters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
101
|
|
|
The following materials from Nuance Communications, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL
(Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the
Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes of Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
53