e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 001-16577
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter).
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-3150651 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5151 Corporate Drive, Troy, Michigan
|
|
48098-2639 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(248) 312-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days.
Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ.
As of August 2, 2011, 554,295,603 shares of the registrants common stock, $0.01 par value,
were issued and outstanding.
FORWARDLOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Forward-looking statements, by their nature, involve
estimates, projections, goals, forecasts, assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in a forward-looking
statement. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding our expectations,
beliefs, plans, goals, objectives and future financial or other performance. Words such as
expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and variations of
such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Any
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Except to fulfill our
obligations under the U.S. securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update any such statement
to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made.
There are a number of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially
from historical performance and these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include:
|
|
|
Volatile interest rates that impact, amongst other things, (i) the mortgage banking
business, (ii) our ability to originate loans and sell assets at a profit, (iii)
prepayment speeds and (iv) our cost of funds, could adversely affect earnings, growth
opportunities and our ability to pay dividends to stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to raise additional capital; |
|
|
|
|
Competitive factors for loans could negatively impact gain on loan sale margins; |
|
|
|
|
Competition from banking and non-banking companies for deposits and loans can affect
our growth opportunities, earnings, gain on sale margins, market share and ability to
transform business model; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the regulation of financial services companies and government-sponsored
housing enterprises, and in particular, declines in the liquidity of the mortgage loan
secondary market, could adversely affect our business; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in regulatory capital requirements or an inability to achieve desired
capital ratios could adversely affect our growth and earnings opportunities and our
ability to originate certain types of loans, as well as our ability to sell certain
types of assets for fair market value or to transform business model; |
|
|
|
|
General business and economic conditions, including unemployment rates, movements in
interest rates, the slope of the yield curve, any increase in mortgage fraud and other
criminal activity and the further decline of asset values in certain geographic
markets, may significantly affect our business activities, loan losses, reserves,
earnings and business prospects; |
|
|
|
|
Factors concerning the implementation of proposed enhancements and transformation of
our business model could result in slower implementation times than we anticipate and
negate any competitive advantage that we may enjoy; |
|
|
|
|
Actions of mortgage loan purchasers, guarantors and insurers regarding repurchases
and indemnity demands and uncertainty related to foreclosure procedures could adversely
affect our business activities and earnings; |
|
|
|
|
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act has resulted in the
elimination of the Office of Thrift Supervision, tightening of capital standards, and the
creation of a new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and has resulted, or will
result, in new laws, regulations and regulatory supervisors that are expected to
increase our costs of operations. In addition, the change to the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency regulation may result in interpretations different than
those of the Office of Thrift Supervision; and |
|
|
|
|
Both the volume and the nature of consumer actions and other forms of litigation
against financial institutions has increased and to the extent that such actions are
brought against us, the cost of defending such suits as well as potential exposure
could increase our costs of operations. |
All of the above factors are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties that may materially
affect actual results, and may be beyond our control. New factors emerge from time to time, and it
is not possible for our management to predict all such factors or to assess the effect of each such
factor on our business.
1
Please also refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors to Part II of this report, Item 1A to Part I of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and Item 1A to Part II of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which are incorporated by reference herein, for further
information on these and other factors affecting us.
Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained
herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore any of these
statements included herein may prove to be inaccurate. In light of the significant uncertainties
inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information
should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions
described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved.
2
FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
4
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash items |
|
$ |
56,031 |
|
|
$ |
60,039 |
|
Interest-earning deposits |
|
|
701,852 |
|
|
|
893,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
757,883 |
|
|
|
953,534 |
|
Securities classified as trading |
|
|
292,438 |
|
|
|
160,775 |
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale |
|
|
551,173 |
|
|
|
475,225 |
|
Loans available-for-sale ($1,870,499 and $2,343,638 at fair value at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively) |
|
|
2,002,888 |
|
|
|
2,585,200 |
|
Loans repurchased with government guarantees |
|
|
1,711,591 |
|
|
|
1,674,752 |
|
Loans held-for-investment ($21,514 and $19,011 at fair value at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively) |
|
|
5,975,134 |
|
|
|
6,305,483 |
|
Less: allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(274,000 |
) |
|
|
(274,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
|
5,701,134 |
|
|
|
6,031,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
10,961,076 |
|
|
|
11,820,930 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
91,527 |
|
|
|
83,893 |
|
Repossessed assets, net |
|
|
110,050 |
|
|
|
151,085 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
301,737 |
|
|
|
337,190 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
244,565 |
|
|
|
232,203 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights at fair value |
|
|
577,401 |
|
|
|
580,299 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
320,425 |
|
|
|
377,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,662,812 |
|
|
$ |
13,643,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
7,405,027 |
|
|
$ |
7,998,099 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
3,406,571 |
|
|
|
3,725,083 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
248,610 |
|
|
|
248,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
11,060,208 |
|
|
|
11,971,792 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
10,935 |
|
|
|
12,965 |
|
Secondary market reserve |
|
|
79,400 |
|
|
|
79,400 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
337,829 |
|
|
|
319,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
11,488,372 |
|
|
|
12,383,841 |
|
Commitments and contingencies Note 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.01 par value, liquidation value $1,000 per share, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 266,657 issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Common stock $0.01 par value, 700,000,000 shares authorized;
554,163,337 and 553,313,113 shares issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
5,533 |
|
Additional paid in capital preferred |
|
|
251,956 |
|
|
|
249,193 |
|
Additional paid in capital common |
|
|
1,464,131 |
|
|
|
1,461,373 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
(16,165 |
) |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
(546,836 |
) |
|
|
(440,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,174,440 |
|
|
|
1,259,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
12,662,812 |
|
|
$ |
13,643,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
98,155 |
|
|
$ |
115,953 |
|
|
$ |
200,269 |
|
|
$ |
232,234 |
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale or trading |
|
|
8,949 |
|
|
|
20,735 |
|
|
|
17,046 |
|
|
|
36,102 |
|
Interest-earning deposits and other |
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
108,061 |
|
|
|
137,170 |
|
|
|
219,240 |
|
|
|
269,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
24,902 |
|
|
|
41,521 |
|
|
|
51,924 |
|
|
|
83,407 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
30,218 |
|
|
|
42,151 |
|
|
|
60,196 |
|
|
|
83,938 |
|
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
6,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
56,737 |
|
|
|
87,617 |
|
|
|
115,343 |
|
|
|
176,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
51,324 |
|
|
|
49,553 |
|
|
|
103,897 |
|
|
|
93,323 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
48,384 |
|
|
|
86,019 |
|
|
|
76,693 |
|
|
|
149,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
(36,466 |
) |
|
|
27,204 |
|
|
|
(56,256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan fees and charges |
|
|
14,712 |
|
|
|
20,236 |
|
|
|
30,850 |
|
|
|
36,565 |
|
Deposit fees and charges |
|
|
7,845 |
|
|
|
8,798 |
|
|
|
15,345 |
|
|
|
17,211 |
|
Loan administration |
|
|
30,450 |
|
|
|
(54,665 |
) |
|
|
69,786 |
|
|
|
(28,515 |
) |
Gain on trading securities |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
69,660 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
66,348 |
|
Loss on transferors interest |
|
|
(2,258 |
) |
|
|
(4,312 |
) |
|
|
(4,640 |
) |
|
|
(6,994 |
) |
Net gain on loan sales |
|
|
39,827 |
|
|
|
64,257 |
|
|
|
90,012 |
|
|
|
116,823 |
|
Net loss on sales of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
(2,381 |
) |
|
|
(1,266 |
) |
|
|
(2,493 |
) |
|
|
(3,479 |
) |
Net gain on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,689 |
|
Net gain on sale of assets |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment gain |
|
|
39,725 |
|
|
|
11,274 |
|
|
|
39,725 |
|
|
|
36,796 |
|
Gain recognized in other comprehensive income before taxes |
|
|
(55,309 |
) |
|
|
(11,665 |
) |
|
|
(55,309 |
) |
|
|
(40,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(15,584 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(15,584 |
) |
|
|
(3,677 |
) |
Other fees and charges, net |
|
|
(15,928 |
) |
|
|
(6,509 |
) |
|
|
(29,216 |
) |
|
|
(28,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
58,078 |
|
|
|
100,331 |
|
|
|
154,344 |
|
|
|
172,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation, commissions and benefits |
|
|
61,156 |
|
|
|
51,104 |
|
|
|
124,464 |
|
|
|
112,125 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
16,969 |
|
|
|
15,903 |
|
|
|
33,587 |
|
|
|
31,914 |
|
Asset resolution |
|
|
23,282 |
|
|
|
52,587 |
|
|
|
61,391 |
|
|
|
75,246 |
|
Federal insurance premiums |
|
|
10,789 |
|
|
|
10,640 |
|
|
|
19,515 |
|
|
|
20,688 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
Warrant income |
|
|
(1,998 |
) |
|
|
(3,486 |
) |
|
|
(2,825 |
) |
|
|
(2,259 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,971 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
20,057 |
|
|
|
19,621 |
|
|
|
40,488 |
|
|
|
37,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
130,922 |
|
|
|
156,181 |
|
|
|
278,153 |
|
|
|
285,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before federal income taxes |
|
|
(69,904 |
) |
|
|
(92,316 |
) |
|
|
(96,605 |
) |
|
|
(169,537 |
) |
Provision for federal income taxes |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
|
|
(70,168 |
) |
|
|
(92,316 |
) |
|
|
(97,133 |
) |
|
|
(169,537 |
) |
Preferred stock dividend/accretion |
|
|
(4,720 |
) |
|
|
(4,690 |
) |
|
|
(9,429 |
) |
|
|
(9,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
(74,888 |
) |
|
$ |
(97,006 |
) |
|
$ |
(106,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(178,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.63 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.63 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
(Accumulated |
|
|
Stockholders' |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Deficit) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
$ |
243,778 |
|
|
$ |
447,449 |
|
|
$ |
(48,263 |
) |
|
$ |
(46,712 |
) |
|
$ |
596,724 |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,537 |
) |
|
|
(169,537 |
) |
Reclassification of gain on sale of
securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,278 |
) |
Reclassification of loss on securities
available-for-sale due to other-than-
temporary impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
Change in net unrealized loss on securities
available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144,556 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
626,913 |
|
Restricted stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,074 |
|
Tax effect from stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
246,481 |
|
|
$ |
1,077,244 |
|
|
$ |
(23,282 |
) |
|
$ |
(225,618 |
) |
|
$ |
1,076,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5,533 |
|
|
$ |
249,193 |
|
|
$ |
1,461,373 |
|
|
$ |
(16,165 |
) |
|
$ |
(440,274 |
) |
|
$ |
1,259,663 |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,133 |
) |
|
|
(97,133 |
) |
Change in net unrealized loss on securities
available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,324 |
) |
Restricted stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
$ |
251,956 |
|
|
$ |
1,464,131 |
|
|
$ |
(356 |
) |
|
$ |
(546,836 |
) |
|
$ |
1,174,440 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(97,133 |
) |
|
$ |
(169,537 |
) |
Adjustments to net loss to net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
76,693 |
|
|
|
149,579 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,166 |
|
|
|
9,314 |
|
Increase in valuation allowance in mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
Loss on fair value of residential first mortgage servicing rights net of hedging gains |
|
|
16,596 |
|
|
|
153,672 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,767 |
|
|
|
4,074 |
|
Gain on interest rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(484 |
) |
Net loss on the sale of assets |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
6,436 |
|
Net gain on loan sales |
|
|
(90,012 |
) |
|
|
(116,823 |
) |
Net loss on sales of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
3,479 |
|
Net gain on securities classified as available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,689 |
) |
Other than temporary impairment losses on securities classified as available-for-sale |
|
|
15,584 |
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
Net gain on trading securities |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(66,348 |
) |
Net loss on transferor interest |
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
6,994 |
|
Proceeds from sales of loans available-for-sale |
|
|
10,456,988 |
|
|
|
10,179,349 |
|
Origination and repurchase of mortgage loans available-for-sale, net of principal
repayments |
|
|
(9,820,042 |
) |
|
|
(10,197,955 |
) |
Increase in repurchase of mortgage loans with government guarantees, net of claims received |
|
|
(36,839 |
) |
|
|
(519,021 |
) |
Purchase of trading securities |
|
|
(131,754 |
) |
|
|
(899,012 |
) |
Increase in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(7,634 |
) |
|
|
(14,048 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
806,496 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
85,684 |
|
|
|
(29,522 |
) |
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
|
|
(2,030 |
) |
|
|
(969 |
) |
Net tax effect of stock grants issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
Increase (decrease) liability for checks issued |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
(4,657 |
) |
Increase in federal income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
(Decrease) increase in payable for mortgage repurchase option |
|
|
(7,862 |
) |
|
|
121,235 |
|
Decrease in other liabilities |
|
|
(6,406 |
) |
|
|
(1,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) in operating activities |
|
|
472,306 |
|
|
|
(581,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,650 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
401,104 |
|
Net purchase of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(75,673 |
) |
|
|
(153,071 |
) |
Net proceeds from sales of portfolio loans |
|
|
(20,366 |
) |
|
|
(58,546 |
) |
Origination of portfolio loans, net of principal repayments |
|
|
191,947 |
|
|
|
127,234 |
|
Proceeds from the disposition of repossessed assets |
|
|
63,797 |
|
|
|
108,799 |
|
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
|
|
35,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of premises and equipment, net of proceeds |
|
|
(19,457 |
) |
|
|
(4,451 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
44,520 |
|
|
|
112,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
220,221 |
|
|
|
547,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
, Continued
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposit accounts |
|
|
(593,072 |
) |
|
|
(524,423 |
) |
Net decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(318,512 |
) |
|
|
(250,000 |
) |
Net decrease in security repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108,000 |
) |
Net receipt of payments of loans serviced for others |
|
|
10,726 |
|
|
|
11,738 |
|
Net receipt of escrow payments |
|
|
19,346 |
|
|
|
7,423 |
|
Net tax benefit for stock grants issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
576,913 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(888,178 |
) |
|
|
(293,131 |
) |
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(195,651 |
) |
|
|
(327,371 |
) |
|
|
|
Beginning cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
953,534 |
|
|
|
1,082,489 |
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
757,883 |
|
|
$ |
755,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment transferred to repossessed assets |
|
$ |
100,298 |
|
|
$ |
279,955 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest payments made on deposits and other borrowings |
|
$ |
117,374 |
|
|
$ |
177,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income taxes paid |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of mortgage loans originated for portfolio to mortgage loans
available-for-sale
|
|
$ |
32,886 |
|
|
$ |
58,546 |
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of mortgage loans originated available-for-sale then transferred
to portfolio loans |
|
$ |
12,520 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights resulting from sale or securitization of loans |
|
$ |
88,954 |
|
|
$ |
93,392 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
9
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1 Nature of Business
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. (Flagstar or the Company), is the holding company for Flagstar
Bank, FSB (the Bank), a federally chartered stock savings bank founded in 1987. Flagstar is the
largest insured depository institution headquartered in Michigan, and is the largest publicly held
savings bank headquartered in the Midwest. At June 30, 2011, Flagstar had $12.7 billion in total
assets, $7.4 billion in deposits and $1.2 billion in stockholders equity.
The Company offers a full array of banking and lending products and services to meet the needs
of both consumers and businesses. Consumer products include deposit accounts, standard and jumbo
home loans, home equity lines of credit, and personal loans, including auto and boat loans.
Business products include deposit and sweep accounts, telephone banking, term loans and lines of
credit, lease financing, government banking products and treasury management services such as
remote deposit and merchant services.
The Company sells or securitizes most of the mortgage loans that it originates and generally
retains the right to service the mortgage loans that it sells. These mortgage-servicing rights
(MSRs) are occasionally sold by the Company in transactions separate from the sale of the
underlying mortgages. The Company may also invest in its loan originations to enhance the
Companys leverage ability and to receive the interest spread between earning assets and paying
liabilities.
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Indianapolis and is subject to
regulation, examination and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) through July
21, 2011 and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) thereafter. The Bank is also
subject to regulation, examination and supervision by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC). The Banks deposits are insured by the FDIC through the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF).
Note 2 Basis of Presentation, Recent Developments and Accounting Policies
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim information and in accordance
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (U.S. GAAP) for complete financial statements. The accompanying interim financial
statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of
normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The
results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. In addition, certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. For
further information, reference should be made to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010, which are available on the Companys Investor Relations web page, at
www.flagstar.com, and on the SEC website, at www.sec.gov.
Recent Developments
On July 26, 2011, the Bank entered into an agreement for the sale or lease of its 27-branch
Georgia retail bank branch franchise to PNC Bank, N.A., part of The PNC Financial Services Group,
Inc (PNC). Management believes the transaction is consistent with its strategic focus on its
core Midwest banking markets, and on its deployment of capital towards its continuing growth in
commercial and consumer banking in those markets, as well as the emerging Northeast market.
Under the agreement, PNC is to purchase the facilities or assume the leases associated with
the branches and is to purchase associated business and retail deposits (approximately $240 million
at June 30, 2011). PNC has agreed to pay the net book value of the acquired real estate and fixed
and other personal assets (approximately $42 million at June 30, 2011) associated with the
branches, and to assume all current lease obligations with respect to the branches. No loans are to
be sold in connection with the transaction. In addition, PNC will be assuming certain liabilities
associated with the Georgia retail bank branch franchise. PNC expects to offer employment to
substantially all of the current Flagstar employees in the region (approximately 120 full-time
employees at June 30, 2011). Flagstars Georgia retail bank franchise incurred a net loss from
operations of approximately $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Banks average
deposit size of the branches was approximately $9 million, 41.6 percent of which were comprised of
certificates of deposits. The Georgia retail bank franchise held approximately 0.3 percent of the
total deposits in the Atlanta, Georgia Metropolitan area, while operating approximately 3.0 percent
of all branches in that area.
The agreement includes customary representations, warranties, and covenants and customary
indemnification, non-compete, non-solicitation and termination provisions. The agreement also
includes customary closing conditions and is subject
10
to regulatory approval. The transaction is
anticipated to close during December 2011 and may be terminated by either party if
the closing has not occurred by June 15, 2012. In addition, the Company agreed to be subject
to the agreements restrictions on competition, solicitation and exclusive dealing.
The 27 affected branches will operate in accordance with the prior course of business through
closing of the transaction, including transactions involving customer ATM cards, checks and
accounts.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. New authoritative
accounting guidance under ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing, amends prior accounting
guidance to enhance reporting about transfers of financial assets, including securitizations, and
where companies have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The
new authoritative accounting guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose
entity and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. The new authoritative
accounting guidance also requires additional disclosures about all continuing involvements with
transferred financial assets including information about gains and losses resulting from transfers
during the period. The adoption of the new authoritative accounting guidance did not have an
effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company adopted Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosure about Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and Allowance For Credit Losses. This guidance requires disclosures that facilitate
the evaluation of the nature of credit risk inherent in its portfolio of financing receivables; how
that risk is analyzed and assessed in determining the allowance for credit losses; and the changes
and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. To achieve those objectives,
disclosures on a disaggregated basis are provided on two defined levels: (1) portfolio segment; and
(2) class of financing receivable. This guidance updates existing disclosure requirements and
includes additional disclosure requirements relating to financing receivables. Short-term accounts
receivable, receivables measured at fair value or lower of cost or fair value and debt securities
are exempt from this guidance. For further information concerning credit quality, refer to Note 6
Loans Held-for-Investment.
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company adopted the provisions of ASU No.
2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair
Value Measurements. The guidance requires separate disclosures of significant transfers in and out
of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers and requires
disclosure on purchases, sales, issuances and settlement activity on gross (rather than net) basis
in the Level 3 reconciliation of fair value measurement for assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. In addition, the guidance clarifies that fair value measurement
disclosures should be provided for each class of assets and liabilities and that disclosures of
inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring Level 2 and
Level 3 fair value measurements. For further information concerning the fair value measurements,
refer to Note 3 Fair Value Accounting.
Pending Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310) A Creditors
Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. The troubled debt
restructuring (TDR) guidance clarifies whether loan modifications constitute TDRs, include
factors and examples for creditors to consider in evaluating whether a restructuring results in a
delay in payment that is insignificant, prohibit creditors from using the borrowers effective rate
test to evaluate whether a concession has been granted to the borrower, and add factors for
creditors to use in determining whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. A
provision in the guidance also ends the FASBs deferral of the additional disclosures about TDRs.
The provisions of this guidance are effective for the first interim and annual period beginning on
or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period
of adoption. The adoption of the guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860)
Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. Under the amended guidance, a
transferor maintains effective control over transferred financial assets if there is an agreement
that both entitles and obligates the transferor to repurchase the financial assets before maturity.
In addition, the following requirements must be met: (a) the financial asset to be repurchased or
redeemed are the same or substantially the same as those transferred, (b) the agreement is to
repurchase or redeem the transferred financial asset before maturity at a fixed or determinable
price, and (c) the agreement is entered into contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the
transfer. This guidance is effective prospectively for transactions, or modifications of existing
transactions, that occur on or after the first interim or annual period beginning on or after
December 15, 2011. The adoption of the guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.
11
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value
Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amended guidance does not
modify the requirements for when fair value measurements apply, rather it generally represents
clarifications on how to measure and disclose fair value under Topic
820, Fair Value Measurement. Some of the amendments the application of existing fair value
measurement requirements and other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for
measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU No. 2011-04
improves the comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial
statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS), by ensuring that fair value has the same meaning in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs and respective
disclosure requirements are the same except for inconsequential differences in wording and style.
This guidance is effective prospectively for annual and interim periods beginning after December
15, 2011. The adoption of the guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The
guidance improves the comparability of financial reporting and facilitates the convergence of U.S.
GAAP and IFRS be amending the guidance in ASC 220, Comprehensive Income. Under the amended
guidance, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of
net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous
statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices,
the entity is required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification
adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the
statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income
are presented. This guidance is effective retrospectively for annual and interim periods beginning
after December 15, 2011. The adoption of the guidance is not expected to have a material impact on
the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.
Note 3 Fair Value Accounting
The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record certain assets and liabilities at fair
value and to determine fair value disclosures.
Valuation Hierarchy
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures establishes a three-level
valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy favors the
transparency of inputs used for the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date
and therefore favors use of Level 1 measurements if appropriate information is available, and
otherwise Level 2, and finally Level 3 if Level 2 input is not available. The three levels are
defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Fair value is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets in which the Company can participate. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Fair value is based upon quoted prices for similar (i.e., not
identical) assets and liabilities in active markets, and other inputs that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially
the full term of the financial instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair value is based upon financial models using primarily
unobservable inputs. |
A financial instruments categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input within the valuation hierarchy that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company for instruments
measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the
valuation hierarchy.
Assets
Securities classified as trading. These securities are comprised of United States Department
of the Treasury (U.S. Treasury) bonds. The U.S. Treasury bonds trade in an active, open market
with readily observable prices and are therefore classified within the Level 1 valuation hierarchy.
Securities classified as available-for-sale. These securities are comprised of U.S.
government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
(CMOs). Where quoted prices for securities are available in an active market, those securities
are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If such quoted market prices are not
available, then fair values are estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with
similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. Due to illiquidity in the markets, the Company
determined the fair value of certain non-agency securities using internal valuation models and
therefore classified them within the Level 3 valuation hierarchy as these models utilize
significant inputs which are unobservable.
12
Loans available-for-sale. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the majority of the
Companys loans originated and classified as available-for-sale were reported at fair value and
classified as Level 2. The Company generally estimated the fair value of mortgage loans based on
quoted market prices for securities backed by similar types of loans. Where quoted market prices
were available, such market prices were utilized as estimates for fair values. Otherwise, the fair
values of loans were estimated by discounting estimated cash flows using managements best estimate
of market interest rates, prepayment speeds and loss assumptions for similar collateral. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
Company had $132.8 million and $241.6 million, respectively, of loans which were originated prior
to the fair value election and accounted for at lower of cost or market. These loans had an
aggregate fair value that exceeded the recorded amount. The $108.8 million decrease was primarily
due to the reclassification of $19.7 million of Ginnie Mae loans, which are serviced for others but
a unilateral right to repurchase exists, to loans held-for-investment upon purchase of those loans, and the sale of $80.3 million of non-performing
residential first mortgage loans during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Loans as to which the
Company has the unilateral right to repurchase from certain securitization transactions, but has
not yet repurchased, are classified as available-for-sale and accounted for at historical cost,
based on current unpaid principal balance.
Loans held-for-investment. The Company generally does not record these loans at fair value on
a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for
loan losses is established. Loans are considered impaired if it is probable that payment of
interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Once a loan is identified as impaired, the fair value of the impaired loan is estimated
using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise
value and liquidation value or discounted cash flows. Impaired loans do not require an allowance
if the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such
loans. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, substantially all of the impaired loans were
evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral rather than on discounted cash flows. If the
fair value of collateral is used to establish an allowance, the underlying impaired loan must be
assigned a classification in the fair value hierarchy. To the extent the fair value of the
collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records
the impaired loan as a non-recurring Level 2 valuation.
Repossessed assets. Loans on which the underlying collateral has been repossessed are
adjusted to fair value less costs to sell upon transfer to repossessed assets. Subsequently,
repossessed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value, less anticipated
marketing and selling costs. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values
of the collateral or managements estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value
of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company
records the repossessed asset as a non-recurring Level 2 valuation.
Residential mortgage servicing rights. The current market for residential mortgage servicing
rights is not sufficiently liquid to provide participants with quoted market prices. Therefore,
the Company uses an option-adjusted spread valuation approach to determine the fair value of
residential MSRs. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple
interest rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted discount rates. The
key assumptions used in the valuation of residential MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds,
discount rates and delinquency rates with related servicing costs. Management periodically obtains
third-party valuations of the residential MSR portfolio to assess the reasonableness of the fair
value calculated by the internal valuation model. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs,
residential MSRs are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. See Note 10 Mortgage
Servicing Rights, for the key assumptions used in the residential MSR valuation process.
Derivative financial instruments. Certain classes of derivative contracts are listed on an
exchange and are actively traded, and they are therefore classified within Level 1 of the valuation
hierarchy. These include U.S. Treasury futures, U.S. Treasury options and interest rate swaps.
The Companys forward loan sale commitments may be valued based on quoted prices for similar assets
in an active market with inputs that are observable and are classified within Level 2 of the
valuation hierarchy. Rate lock commitments are valued using internal models with significant
unobservable market parameters and therefore are classified within Level 3 of the valuation
hierarchy.
Liabilities
Warrants. Warrant liabilities are valued using a binomial lattice model and are classified
within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Significant assumptions include expected volatility, a
risk free rate and an expected life.
13
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
The following tables present the financial instruments carried at fair value as of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, by caption on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition and by
the valuation hierarchy (as described above):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury bonds |
|
$ |
292,437 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
292,437 |
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,765 |
|
|
|
418,765 |
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
132,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,408 |
|
Loans available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,870,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,870,499 |
|
Loans held-for-investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,514 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577,401 |
|
|
|
577,401 |
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
424,845 |
|
|
$ |
1,892,013 |
|
|
$ |
1,007,086 |
|
|
$ |
3,323,944 |
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury futures |
|
$ |
6,104 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,104 |
|
Agency forwards |
|
|
4,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,686 |
|
Forward agency and loan sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,198 |
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
|
10,790 |
|
|
|
8,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
|
|
|
Warrant liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
10,790 |
|
|
$ |
14,674 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury bonds |
|
$ |
160,775 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
160,775 |
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467,488 |
|
|
|
467,488 |
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
7,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,737 |
|
Loans available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,343,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,343,638 |
|
Loans held-for-investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,011 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580,299 |
|
|
|
580,299 |
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward agency and loan sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,820 |
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,396 |
|
|
|
14,396 |
|
Agency forwards |
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets |
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
35,820 |
|
|
|
14,396 |
|
|
|
54,304 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
172,600 |
|
|
$ |
2,398,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,062,183 |
|
|
$ |
3,633,252 |
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury futures |
|
$ |
(13,176 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(13,176 |
) |
Warrant liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,300 |
) |
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
(13,176 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,300 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(22,476 |
) |
|
|
|
There were no transfers of assets or liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis into or out of Level 3 fair value measurements during the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010. The derivatives are reported in other assets on the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition and warrant liabilities are reported in other liabilities on the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
14
Changes in Level 3 fair value measurements
A determination to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy
is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement.
However, Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level
3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be
validated to external sources). Accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include
changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are included within the valuation
methodology. Also, the Company manages the risk associated with the observable components of Level
3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within Level
1 or Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy; these Level 1 and Level 2 risk management instruments are
not included below, and therefore the gains and losses in the tables do not reflect the effect of
the Companys risk management activities related to such Level 3 instruments.
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
The tables below include a roll forward of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
amounts for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (including the change in
fair value) for financial instruments classified by the Company within Level 3 of the valuation
hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
Beginning |
|
|
Gains / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and/or Out of |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Held at End |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
of Period |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
End of Period |
|
|
of Period (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale: (2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agencies |
|
$ |
444,957 |
|
|
$ |
(5,363 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(20,829 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
418,765 |
|
|
$ |
10,221 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
635,122 |
|
|
|
(95,976 |
) |
|
|
38,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
|
13,780 |
|
|
|
44,792 |
|
|
|
48,215 |
|
|
|
(95,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,093,859 |
|
|
$ |
(56,547 |
) |
|
$ |
86,470 |
|
|
$ |
(116,696 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,007,086 |
|
|
$ |
10,221 |
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade residual interests (1) |
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
(286 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale: (2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agencies |
|
|
523,901 |
|
|
|
14,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
517,406 |
|
|
|
25,914 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
540,800 |
|
|
|
(111,715 |
) |
|
|
44,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments (4) |
|
|
13,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,078,072 |
|
|
$ |
(97,678 |
) |
|
$ |
77,714 |
|
|
$ |
(20,818 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,037,290 |
|
|
$ |
25,914 |
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale: (2)(3)
Non-agencies |
|
$ |
467,488 |
|
|
$ |
2,359 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(51,082 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
418,765 |
|
|
$ |
17,943 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
580,299 |
|
|
|
(91,853 |
) |
|
|
88,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
|
14,396 |
|
|
|
38,590 |
|
|
|
97,059 |
|
|
|
(139,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,062,183 |
|
|
$ |
(50,904 |
) |
|
$ |
186,014 |
|
|
$ |
(190,207 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,007,086 |
|
|
$ |
17,943 |
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade residual interests (1) |
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
|
$ |
(2,057 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale: (2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agencies |
|
|
538,376 |
|
|
|
22,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
517,406 |
|
|
|
25,914 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
649,133 |
|
|
|
(268,315 |
) |
|
|
92,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments (4) |
|
|
10,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,199,627 |
|
|
$ |
(248,135 |
) |
|
$ |
129,005 |
|
|
$ |
(43,207 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,037,290 |
|
|
$ |
25,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Residual interests are valued using internal inputs supplemented by independent third
party inputs. |
|
(2) |
|
Realized gains (losses), including unrealized losses deemed other-than-temporary and
related to credit issues, are reported in non-interest income. Unrealized gains (losses)
are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss. |
|
(3) |
|
U.S. government agency securities classified as available-for-sale are valued
predominantly using quoted broker/dealer prices with adjustments to reflect for any
assumptions a willing market participant would include in its valuation. Non-agency
securities classified as available-for-sale are valued using internal valuation models and
pricing information from third parties. |
|
(4) |
|
Purchases as disclosed on a net basis and include purchases, issuances and settlements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
Changes in the unrealized gains (losses) related to financial instruments held at the
end of the period. |
15
The Company also has assets that under certain conditions are subject to measurement at
fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets are measured at the lower of cost or market and
had a fair value below cost at the end of the period as summarized below:
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage loans |
|
$ |
30,265 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,265 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
153,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repossessed assets (2) |
|
|
110,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
293,769 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
293,769 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage loans |
|
$ |
32,025 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,025 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
218,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repossessed assets (2) |
|
|
151,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
401,201 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
401,201 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company recorded $15.2 million and $29.8 million in fair value losses on impaired loans
(include in provision for loan
losses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations) during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, respectively,
compared to $60.7 million and $74.3 million in fair value losses on impaired loans during the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company recorded $5.7 million and $18.9 million in losses related to write-downs of
repossessed assets based
on the estimated fair value of the asset, and recognized net gains of $0.8 million and $0.7
million on sales of
repossessed assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $32.2
million
and $39.6 million in losses related to write-downs of repossessed assets based on the
estimated fair value of the asset,
and recognized net losses of $1.9 million and $6.3 million on sales of repossessed assets
during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The accounting guidance for financial instruments requires disclosures of the estimated fair
value of certain financial instruments and the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate
their fair values. Certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments are excluded
from the scope of this guidance. Accordingly, the fair value disclosures required by this guidance
are only indicative of the value of individual financial instruments as of the dates indicated and
should not be considered an indication of the fair value of the Company.
16
The following table presents the carrying amount and estimated fair value of certain financial
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
757,883 |
|
|
$ |
757,883 |
|
|
$ |
953,534 |
|
|
$ |
953,534 |
|
Securities classified as trading |
|
|
292,437 |
|
|
|
292,437 |
|
|
|
160,775 |
|
|
|
160,775 |
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale |
|
|
551,173 |
|
|
|
551,173 |
|
|
|
475,225 |
|
|
|
475,225 |
|
Loans available-for-sale |
|
|
2,002,888 |
|
|
|
2,008,273 |
|
|
|
2,585,200 |
|
|
|
2,513,239 |
|
Loans repurchased with government
guarantees |
|
|
1,711,591 |
|
|
|
1,711,591 |
|
|
|
1,674,752 |
|
|
|
1,674,752 |
|
Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
|
5,701,134 |
|
|
|
5,651,358 |
|
|
|
6,031,483 |
|
|
|
5,976,623 |
|
Repossessed assets |
|
|
110,050 |
|
|
|
110,050 |
|
|
|
151,085 |
|
|
|
151,085 |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
301,736 |
|
|
|
301,736 |
|
|
|
337,190 |
|
|
|
337,190 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
577,401 |
|
|
|
577,401 |
|
|
|
580,299 |
|
|
|
580,299 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits and savings accounts |
|
|
(2,447,009 |
) |
|
|
(2,323,499 |
) |
|
|
(2,153,438 |
) |
|
|
(2,075,898 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(2,764,782 |
) |
|
|
(2,811,955 |
) |
|
|
(3,230,972 |
) |
|
|
(3,292,983 |
) |
Government accounts |
|
|
(674,869 |
) |
|
|
(652,623 |
) |
|
|
(663,976 |
) |
|
|
(664,572 |
) |
National certificates of deposit |
|
|
(703,201 |
) |
|
|
(720,330 |
) |
|
|
(883,270 |
) |
|
|
(906,699 |
) |
Company controlled deposits |
|
|
(815,166 |
) |
|
|
(805,410 |
) |
|
|
(1,066,443 |
) |
|
|
(1,048,432 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
(3,406,572 |
) |
|
|
(3,611,611 |
) |
|
|
(3,725,083 |
) |
|
|
(3,901,385 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(248,610 |
) |
|
|
(99,439 |
) |
|
|
(248,610 |
) |
|
|
(100,534 |
) |
Warrant liabilities |
|
|
(6,476 |
) |
|
|
(6,476 |
) |
|
|
(9,300 |
) |
|
|
(9,300 |
) |
Derivative Financial Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward delivery contracts |
|
|
(8,198 |
) |
|
|
(8,198 |
) |
|
|
35,820 |
|
|
|
35,820 |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
|
14,396 |
|
|
|
14,396 |
|
U.S. Treasury and agency futures/forwards |
|
|
(10,790 |
) |
|
|
(10,790 |
) |
|
|
(9,088 |
) |
|
|
(9,088 |
) |
The methods and assumptions that were used to estimate the fair value of financial assets
and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are
discussed above. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
other financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and cash equivalents. Due to their short-term nature, the carrying amount of cash and
cash equivalents approximates fair value.
Loans repurchased with government guarantees. The carrying value of loans repurchased with
government guarantees approximates fair value.
Loans held-for-investment. The fair value of loans is estimated by using internally developed
discounted cash flow models using market interest rate inputs as well as managements best estimate
of spreads for similar collateral.
FHLB stock. No secondary market exists for FHLB stock. The stock is bought and sold at par
by the FHLB. Management believes that the recorded value is the fair value.
Deposit accounts. The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts approximates the
carrying amount. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the
rates currently offered for certificates of deposit with similar remaining maturities.
FHLB advances. Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and
remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of the existing debt.
Long-term debt. The fair value of the long-term debt is estimated based on a discounted cash
flow model that incorporates the Companys current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
17
Note 4 Investment Securities
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, investment securities were comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury bonds |
|
$ |
291,923 |
|
|
$ |
851 |
|
|
$ |
(336 |
) |
|
$ |
292,438 |
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agencies |
|
$ |
446,020 |
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
$ |
(27,747 |
) |
|
$ |
418,765 |
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
131,497 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
132,408 |
|
|
|
|
Total securities classified as
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
577,517 |
|
|
$ |
1,477 |
|
|
$ |
(27,821 |
) |
|
$ |
551,173 |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury bonds |
|
$ |
160,289 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
160,775 |
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agencies |
|
$ |
510,167 |
|
|
$ |
1,979 |
|
|
$ |
(44,658 |
) |
|
$ |
467,488 |
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
7,211 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,737 |
|
|
|
|
Total securities classified as
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
517,378 |
|
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
|
$ |
(44,658 |
) |
|
$ |
475,225 |
|
|
|
|
Trading
Securities classified as trading are comprised of AAA-rated U.S. Treasury bonds. U.S.
Treasury bonds held in trading are distinguished from available-for-sale based upon the intent of
the Company to use them as an economic offset against changes in the valuation of the MSR
portfolio; however, these securities do not qualify as an accounting hedge as defined in current
accounting guidance for derivatives and hedges.
For U.S. Treasury bonds held, the Company recorded an unrealized gain of $0.1 million during
both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively. For the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a gain of $69.6 million and $66.3 million,
respectively, of which $21.0 million was unrealized gain on U.S. Treasury bonds held at June 30,
2010.
Available-for-Sale
Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses
reported as a component of other comprehensive loss to the extent they are temporary in nature or
other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) as to non-credit related issues. If unrealized losses
are, at any time, deemed to have arisen from OTTI, the credit related portion is reported as an
expense for that period. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $551.2 million
and $475.2 million, respectively, in securities classified as available-for-sale which were
comprised of U.S. government sponsored agency and non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations.
The following table summarizes by duration the unrealized loss positions, at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, on securities classified as available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Loss Position with |
|
|
Unrealized Loss Position with |
|
|
|
Duration 12 Months and Over |
|
|
Duration Under 12 Months |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Type of Security |
|
Value |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored agency securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
132,408 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
387,884 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(27,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
387,884 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
(27,747 |
) |
|
$ |
132,408 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
$ |
432,577 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
(44,658 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale amounted to $0.1 million in U.S.
government sponsored agency securities and $27.7 million non-agency CMOs at June 30, 2011. These
CMOs consist of interests in investment vehicles backed by residential first mortgage loans.
18
An investment impairment analysis is triggered when the estimated market value is less than
amortized cost for an
extended period of time, generally six months. Before an analysis is performed, the Company
also reviews the general market conditions for the specific type of underlying collateral for each
security; in this case, the mortgage market in general has suffered from significant losses in
value. With the assistance of third party experts as deemed necessary, the Company models the
expected cash flows of the underlying mortgage assets using historical factors such as default
rates, current delinquency rates and estimated factors such as prepayment speed, default speed and
severity speed. Next, the cash flows are modeled through the appropriate waterfall for each CMO
tranche owned; the level of credit support provided by subordinated tranches is included in the
waterfall analysis. The resulting estimated cash flow of principal and interest is then utilized
by management to estimate the amount of credit losses by security.
The credit losses on the portfolio reflect the economic conditions present in the U.S. over
the course of the last several years and the forecasted effect of changes in such conditions, including changes in the forecasted level of home prices. This includes high mortgage defaults, declines in collateral
values and changes in homeowner behavior, such as intentionally defaulting on a note due to a home
value worth less than the outstanding debt on the home (so-called strategic defaults.)
In both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, $15.6 million
of OTTI, primarily due to forecasted credit losses on CMOs, that was recognized on eight
securities that did not already have such losses prior to June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, the
cumulative amount of OTTI due to credit losses totaled $53.1 million. During the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2010, additional OTTI due to credit losses on investments with
existing OTTI credit losses totaled $0.4 million and $3.7 million, respectively, while additional
OTTI due to credit loss was recognized on two securities that did not already have such losses at
June 30, 2010. All OTTI due to credit losses was recognized in current operations.
At June 30, 2011, the Company had total OTTI of $39.7 million on eight CMOs with existing OTTI
in the available-for-sale portfolio with $55.3 million net gain recognized in other comprehensive
income. At December 31, 2010, the Company had total OTTI of $43.6 million on 10 CMOs in the
available-for-sale portfolio with $48.6 million in total net gain recognized in other comprehensive
income. The impairment losses arising from credit related matters were reported in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table shows the activity for OTTI credit
loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
(38,744 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,558 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,046 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,272 |
) |
Additions on securities with no prior OTTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of principal on securities |
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change on securities with previous OTTI
recognized |
|
|
(15,584 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(15,584 |
) |
|
|
(3,677 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
(53,111 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,949 |
) |
|
$ |
(53,111 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,949 |
) |
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on the sale of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities
available-for-sale that are recently created with underlying mortgage products originated by the
Bank are reported within net gain on loan sale. Securities in this category have typically
remained in the portfolio less than 90 days before sale. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, there were no sales of U.S. government sponsored agency securities with
underlying mortgage products recently originated by the Bank.
Gains (losses) on sales for all other available-for-sale securities types are reported in net
gain on sale of available-for-sales securities. During the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, the Company did not have any sales of non-agency securities compared to the same periods
ended June 30, 2010, in which the Company sold $198.2 million and $251.0 million in non-agency
securities available-for-sale, respectively, resulting in a net gain on sale of $4.5 million and
$6.7 million, respectively.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the aggregate amount of available-for-sale
securities from each of the following non-agency issuers was greater than 10 percent of the
Companys stockholders equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Name of Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Countrywide Home Loans |
|
$ |
152,156 |
|
|
$ |
143,834 |
|
|
$ |
173,860 |
|
|
$ |
159,910 |
|
Flagstar Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1 |
|
|
136,208 |
|
|
|
124,587 |
|
|
|
149,717 |
|
|
|
136,707 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
288,364 |
|
|
$ |
268,421 |
|
|
$ |
323,577 |
|
|
$ |
296,617 |
|
|
|
|
19
Note 5 Loans Available-for-Sale
Total loans available-for-sale were $2.0 billion and $2.6 billion at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, and were comprised primarily of residential first mortgage loans.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company
sold $80.3 million of non-performing residential first mortgage loans in the available-for-sale
category at a sale price which approximated carrying value.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $1.9 billion and $2.3 billion of loans
available-for-sale were recorded at fair value, respectively. The Company estimates the fair value
of mortgage loans based on quoted market prices for securities backed by similar types of loans for
which quoted market prices were available. Otherwise, the fair values of loans were estimated by
discounting estimated cash flows using managements best estimate of market interest rates for
similar collateral.
Note 6 Loans Repurchased With Government Guarantees
Pursuant to Ginnie Mae servicing guidelines, the Company has the unilateral option to
repurchase certain delinquency loans securitized in Ginnie Mae pools, if the loans meet defined
criteria. As a result of this unilateral option, once the delinquency criteria have been met, and
regardless of whether the repurchase option has been exercised, the Company must treat the loans as
having been repurchased and recognize the loans as loans available-for-sale on the Consolidated
Statement of Financial Condition and also recognize a corresponding liability for a similar amount.
If the loans are actually repurchased, the Company records the loans to loans repurchased with
government guarantees and eliminates the corresponding liability. At June 30, 2011, the amount of
such loans actually repurchased totaled $1.7 billion and were classified as loans repurchased with
government guarantees, and those loans which the Company had not yet repurchased but had the
unilateral right to repurchase totaled $104.2 million and were classified as loans
available-for-sale. At December 31, 2010, the amount of such loans actually repurchased totaled
$1.7 billion and were classified as loans repurchased with government guarantees, and those loans
which the Company had not yet repurchased but had the unilateral right to repurchase totaled $112.0
million and were classified as loans available-for-sale.
Substantially all of these loans continue to be insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) and the Companys management believes that the reimbursement process is
proceeding appropriately. On average, claims have historically been filed and paid in
approximately 18 months from the date of the initial delinquency; however increasing volumes
throughout the country, as well as changes in the foreclosure process in states throughout the
country and other forms of government intervention may result in changes to the historical norm.
These repurchased loans earn interest at a statutory rate, which varies and is based upon the
10-year U.S. Treasury note rate at the time the underlying loan becomes delinquent.
On June 30, 2011, the Company implemented a reclassification in the financial statement
treatment of amounts due from the FHA relating to the servicing of delinquent FHA loans to
recognize the accrued credit arising from the underlying interest income as interest income.
Previously, such income relating to the servicing of such delinquent loans was applied as a net
offset to non-interest expense (i.e., asset resolution expense). The impact of the
reclassification on the three- and six- month periods ended June 30, 2011, was an increase in net
interest income of $12.7 million and $25.5 million, respectively, with a corresponding increase to
asset resolution expense. The impact of the reclassification on the three- and six- month periods
ended June 30, 2010, was an increase in net interest income of $7.1 million and $13.2 million,
respectively, with a corresponding increase to asset resolution expense.
Note 7 Loans Held-for-Investment
Loans held-for-investment are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
3,744,342 |
|
|
$ |
3,784,700 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
155,537 |
|
|
|
174,789 |
|
Construction |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
8,012 |
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
513,678 |
|
|
|
720,770 |
|
HELOC |
|
|
241,396 |
|
|
|
271,326 |
|
Other |
|
|
77,052 |
|
|
|
86,710 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
4,732,903 |
|
|
|
5,046,307 |
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,111,131 |
|
|
|
1,250,301 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
99,173 |
|
|
|
8,875 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
31,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
1,242,231 |
|
|
|
1,259,176 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer and commercial loans held-for-investment |
|
|
5,975,134 |
|
|
|
6,305,483 |
|
|
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(274,000 |
) |
|
|
(274,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
$ |
5,701,134 |
|
|
$ |
6,031,483 |
|
|
|
|
20
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, the Company transferred $5.4
million and $12.5 million, respectively, in loans available-for-sale to loans held-for-investment.
The loans transferred were carried at fair value, and will continue to be reported at fair value
while classified as held-for-investment. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company
sold $37.2 million of non-performing commercial real estate loans included in loans
held-for-investment. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company transferred $578.2
million of non-performing residential first mortgage loans
from loans held-for-investment to loans available-for-sale, as a result of the $474.0 million
sale of non-performing residential first mortgage loans and the transfer of $104.2 million in
similar loans to available-for-sale.
The Companys commercial leasing activities consist primarily of equipment leases. Generally,
lessees are responsible for all maintenance, taxes, and insurance on leased properties. The
following table lists the components of the net investment in financing leases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total minimum lease payment to be received |
|
$ |
33,152 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Estimated residual values of lease properties |
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: unearned income |
|
|
(3,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in commercial financing leases |
|
$ |
31,927 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
The following outlines the Companys minimum lease receivables for direct financing leases for
the five succeeding years and thereafter. The Company had no commercial financing leases at
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
4,021 |
|
2012 |
|
|
7,139 |
|
2013 |
|
|
7,139 |
|
2014 |
|
|
7,376 |
|
2015 |
|
|
5,271 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company adopted the provision of ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosure
about Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance For Credit Losses for the year ended
December 31, 2010. This guidance requires an entity to provide disclosures that facilitate the
evaluation of the nature of credit risk inherent in its portfolio of financing receivables; how
that risk is analyzed and assessed in determining the allowance for credit losses; and the changes
and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. To achieve those objectives,
disclosures on a disaggregated basis must be provided on two defined levels: (1) portfolio segment;
and (2) class of financing receivable. This guidance makes changes to existing disclosure
requirements and includes additional disclosure requirements relating to financing receivables.
Short-term accounts receivable, receivables measured at fair value or lower of cost or fair value
and debt securities are exempt from this guidance.
21
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of probable losses in our
loans held-for-investment portfolio as of the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The
allowance provides for probable losses that have been identified with specific customer
relationships and for probable losses believed to be inherent in the loan portfolio but that have
not been specifically identified. Consistent with such disclosure requirements, set forth below is
the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the six-month and year-end periods noted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
274,000 |
|
|
$ |
524,000 |
|
|
$ |
524,000 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
76,693 |
|
|
|
149,579 |
|
|
|
426,353 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
|
(10,865 |
) |
|
|
(75,282 |
) |
|
|
(473,484 |
) |
Second mortgage |
|
|
(11,916 |
) |
|
|
(15,096 |
) |
|
|
(27,976 |
) |
Construction |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(581 |
) |
Warehouse lending |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(1,749 |
) |
|
|
(2,154 |
) |
HELOC |
|
|
(9,988 |
) |
|
|
(12,240 |
) |
|
|
(21,618 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
(2,620 |
) |
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
(34,822 |
) |
|
|
(106,064 |
) |
|
|
(528,433 |
) |
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
(45,246 |
) |
|
|
(39,736 |
) |
|
|
(152,369 |
) |
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
(1,832 |
) |
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
(45,303 |
) |
|
|
(40,199 |
) |
|
|
(154,201 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,259 |
) |
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
(2,840 |
) |
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
$ |
(81,384 |
) |
|
$ |
(147,648 |
) |
|
$ |
(685,474 |
) |
|
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
2,506 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
Construction |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
HELOC |
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
Other |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
3,168 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
7,222 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
Other |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
$ |
4,691 |
|
|
$ |
4,069 |
|
|
$ |
9,121 |
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs, net of recoveries |
|
$ |
(76,693 |
) |
|
$ |
(143,579 |
) |
|
$ |
(676,353 |
) |
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
274,000 |
|
|
$ |
530,000 |
|
|
$ |
274,000 |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off ratio |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
9.34 |
% |
|
|
|
22
The allowance for loan losses by class of loan is summarized in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Second |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
First Mortgage |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Lending |
|
|
Consumer(1) |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
and Industrial |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance allowance
for loan losses |
|
$ |
117,939 |
|
|
$ |
25,186 |
|
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
|
$ |
4,171 |
|
|
$ |
24,819 |
|
|
$ |
93,437 |
|
|
$ |
1,542 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,445 |
|
|
$ |
274,000 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(10,865 |
) |
|
|
(11,916 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(12,593 |
) |
|
|
(45,246 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,384 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
Provision |
|
|
37,676 |
|
|
|
5,617 |
|
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
4,003 |
|
|
|
31,746 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
76,693 |
|
|
|
|
Ending balance allowance
for loan losses |
|
$ |
145,244 |
|
|
$ |
20,097 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
1,620 |
|
|
$ |
18,019 |
|
|
$ |
81,128 |
|
|
$ |
2,320 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
5,158 |
|
|
$ |
274,000 |
|
| |
|
Ending balance: individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
9,270 |
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,028 |
|
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,527 |
|
Ending balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
37,494 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,885 |
|
| |
|
Total allowance allocated to
impaired loans |
|
$ |
46,764 |
|
|
$ |
1,887 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,095 |
|
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
88,412 |
|
| |
|
Loans held-for-investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
3,744,342 |
|
|
$ |
155,537 |
|
|
$ |
898 |
|
|
$ |
513,678 |
|
|
$ |
318,448 |
|
|
$ |
1,111,131 |
|
|
$ |
99,173 |
|
|
$ |
31,927 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,975,134 |
|
| |
|
Ending balance: individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
75,426 |
|
|
$ |
3,970 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
182,066 |
|
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
263,381 |
|
Ending balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
483,790 |
|
|
|
9,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493,596 |
|
| |
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
559,216 |
|
|
$ |
13,348 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
182,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
756,977 |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance allowance
for loan losses |
|
$ |
117,939 |
|
|
$ |
25,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
|
$ |
4,171 |
|
|
$ |
24,819 |
|
|
$ |
93,436 |
|
|
$ |
1,542 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,445 |
|
|
$ |
274,000 |
|
| |
|
Ending balance: individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
8,677 |
|
|
$ |
580 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
53,865 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,012 |
|
Ending balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
40,816 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,499 |
|
| |
|
Total allowance allocated to
impaired loans |
|
$ |
49,493 |
|
|
$ |
1,868 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
54,260 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
106,511 |
|
| |
|
Loans held-for-investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
3,784,700 |
|
|
$ |
174,789 |
|
|
$ |
8,012 |
|
|
$ |
720,770 |
|
|
$ |
358,036 |
|
|
$ |
1,250,301 |
|
|
$ |
8,875 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,305,483 |
|
| |
|
Ending balance: individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
75,375 |
|
|
$ |
4,165 |
|
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
232,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,619 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
315,419 |
|
Ending balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
526,661 |
|
|
|
9,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537,658 |
|
| |
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
602,036 |
|
|
$ |
13,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
234,535 |
|
|
$ |
1,619 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
853,077 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consumer loans include HELOC and other consumer. Loans that are individually evaluated
for impairment include only consumer HELOC loans at December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010 total consumer allowance for loan losses includes $16.2 million and
$21.4 million of HELOC, respectively, and $1.8 million and $3.4 million of other consumer,
respectively. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, total ending balance of loans
held-for-investment includes $24.1 million and $271.3 million of HELOC, respectively, and
$77.0 million and $86.7 million of other consumer, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Consumer loans include: residential first mortgages, second mortgages, construction,
warehouse lending and consumer loans. Commercial loans include: commercial real estate,
commercial and industrial, and commercial lease financing. |
23
There were loans totaling $0.4 million and $11.5 million greater than 90 days past due
that were still accruing interest as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The
following table presents an age analysis of past due loans by class of loan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-59 Days |
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
Greater than |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment |
|
|
90 Days and Still |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
90
days |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first
mortgage |
|
$ |
84,265 |
|
|
$ |
42,911 |
|
|
$ |
286,083 |
|
|
$ |
413,259 |
|
|
$ |
3,331,083 |
|
|
$ |
3,744,342 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
6,242 |
|
|
|
9,140 |
|
|
|
146,397 |
|
|
|
155,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
513,650 |
|
|
|
513,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
3,815 |
|
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
5,212 |
|
|
|
11,268 |
|
|
|
230,128 |
|
|
|
241,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
75,627 |
|
|
|
77,052 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
| |
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
46,082 |
|
|
|
298,751 |
|
|
|
436,018 |
|
|
|
4,296,885 |
|
|
|
4,732,903 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real
estate |
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
103,014 |
|
|
|
104,553 |
|
|
|
1,006,578 |
|
|
|
1,111,131 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
Commercial lease
financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,927 |
|
|
|
31,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and
industrial |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
97,517 |
|
|
|
99,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
104,630 |
|
|
|
106,209 |
|
|
|
1,136,022 |
|
|
|
1,242,231 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
92,577 |
|
|
$ |
46,269 |
|
|
$ |
403,381 |
|
|
$ |
542,227 |
|
|
$ |
5,432,907 |
|
|
$ |
5,975,134 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first
mortgage |
|
$ |
96,768 |
|
|
$ |
40,826 |
|
|
$ |
119,903 |
|
|
$ |
257,497 |
|
|
$ |
3,527,203 |
|
|
$ |
3,784,700 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
3,587 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
|
7,480 |
|
|
|
13,030 |
|
|
|
161,759 |
|
|
|
174,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
4,991 |
|
|
|
8,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720,770 |
|
|
|
720,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
3,735 |
|
|
|
3,783 |
|
|
|
6,713 |
|
|
|
14,231 |
|
|
|
257,095 |
|
|
|
271,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
84,614 |
|
|
|
86,710 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
105,029 |
|
|
|
46,907 |
|
|
|
137,939 |
|
|
|
289,875 |
|
|
|
4,756,432 |
|
|
|
5,046,307 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real
estate |
|
|
28,245 |
|
|
|
6,783 |
|
|
|
175,559 |
|
|
|
210,587 |
|
|
|
1,039,714 |
|
|
|
1,250,301 |
|
|
|
8,143 |
|
Commercial and
industrial |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
4,918 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
8,875 |
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
28,420 |
|
|
|
6,838 |
|
|
|
180,477 |
|
|
|
215,735 |
|
|
|
1,043,441 |
|
|
|
1,259,176 |
|
|
|
11,443 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
133,449 |
|
|
$ |
53,745 |
|
|
$ |
318,416 |
|
|
$ |
505,610 |
|
|
$ |
5,799,873 |
|
|
$ |
6,305,483 |
|
|
$ |
11,495 |
|
|
|
|
For purposes of impairment testing, impaired loans greater than an established threshold
($1.0 million) were individually evaluated for impairment. Loans below those scopes were
collectively evaluated as homogeneous pools. Renegotiated loans are evaluated at the present value
of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate. The required
valuation allowance is included in the allowance for loan losses in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when any portion of principal or interest is 90 days
delinquent or earlier when concerns exist as to the ultimate collection of principal or interest.
When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, the accrued and unpaid interest is reversed and
interest income is recorded as collected. Loans return to accrual status when principal and
interest become current and are anticipated to be fully collectible. Interest income is recognized
on impaired loans using a cost recovery method unless the receipt of principal and interest as they
become contractually due is not in doubt, such as with a TDR. Loans on which interest accruals
have been discontinued totaled approximately $402.9 million at June 30, 2011 and $306.9 million at
December 31, 2010. Interest that would have been accrued on such loans totaled approximately $5.7
million and $11.1 million during the three- and six- months ended June 30, 2011, respectively,
compared to $13.5 million and $21.7 million during the three- and six- months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively.
The Company may modify certain loans to retain customers or to maximize collection of the loan
balance. The Company has maintained several programs designed to assist borrowers by extending
payment dates or reducing the borrowers contractual payments. All loan modifications are made on
a case by case basis. Loan modification programs for borrowers have resulted in a significant
increase in restructured loans. These loans are classified as TDRs and are included in non-accrual
loans if the loan was non-accruing prior to the restructuring or if the payment amount increased
significantly. These loans will continue on non-accrual status until the borrower has established
a willingness and ability to make the restructured payments for at least six months, after which
they will begin to accrue interest. At June 30, 2011, TDRs totaled $704.6 million of which $150.2
million were non-accruing and $2.1 million were classified as available-for-sale, compared to
December 31, 2010, TDRs totaled $768.7 million of which $124.5 million were non-accruing and $34.0
million were classified as available-for-sale.
24
A loan is impaired when it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made
in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Impaired loans with no allowance for loan losses allocated (1) |
|
$ |
82,017 |
|
|
$ |
101,961 |
|
Impaired loans with allowance for loan losses allocated |
|
|
674,960 |
|
|
|
751,116 |
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
756,977 |
|
|
$ |
853,077 |
|
Amount of the allowance allocated to impaired loans |
|
$ |
88,412 |
|
|
$ |
106,511 |
|
Average investment in impaired loans |
|
$ |
807,180 |
|
|
$ |
990,587 |
|
Cash-basis interest income recognized during impairment (2) |
|
$ |
16,534 |
|
|
$ |
31,030 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes loans for which the principal balance has been charged down to net realizable value. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes interest income recognized during the six months and twelve months ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which expected
discounted cash flows or the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs exceeded the
recorded investments in such loans. At June 30, 2011, approximately 30.8 percent of the total
impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of related collateral.
25
The following table presents impaired loans with no related allowance and with an allowance
recorded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Recognized (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
37,974 |
|
|
$ |
37,974 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
40,920 |
|
|
$ |
868 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
44,043 |
|
|
|
72,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,724 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
Commercial and industrial (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
82,017 |
|
|
$ |
110,600 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
87,665 |
|
|
$ |
1,686 |
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
521,242 |
|
|
$ |
521,242 |
|
|
$ |
46,764 |
|
|
$ |
543,531 |
|
|
$ |
11,267 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
13,348 |
|
|
|
13,348 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
13,391 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
Construction |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
138,451 |
|
|
|
177,038 |
|
|
|
39,095 |
|
|
|
160,083 |
|
|
|
2,921 |
|
Commercial and industrial (3) |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
674,960 |
|
|
$ |
713,547 |
|
|
$ |
88,412 |
|
|
$ |
719,515 |
|
|
$ |
14,848 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
559,216 |
|
|
$ |
559,216 |
|
|
$ |
46,764 |
|
|
$ |
584,451 |
|
|
$ |
12,135 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
13,348 |
|
|
|
13,348 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
13,391 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
Construction |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
182,494 |
|
|
|
249,664 |
|
|
|
39,095 |
|
|
|
206,807 |
|
|
|
3,739 |
|
Commercial and industrial (3) |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
756,977 |
|
|
$ |
824,147 |
|
|
$ |
88,412 |
|
|
$ |
807,180 |
|
|
$ |
16,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
42,255 |
|
|
$ |
42,255 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
54,482 |
|
|
$ |
1,747 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
59,642 |
|
|
|
107,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,547 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
Commercial and industrial (3) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,961 |
|
|
$ |
149,783 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
125,149 |
|
|
$ |
3,877 |
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
559,781 |
|
|
$ |
559,781 |
|
|
$ |
49,493 |
|
|
$ |
553,231 |
|
|
$ |
21,108 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
13,471 |
|
|
|
13,471 |
|
|
|
1,868 |
|
|
|
13,987 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
Construction |
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
HELOC |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
174,893 |
|
|
|
224,334 |
|
|
|
54,260 |
|
|
|
293,162 |
|
|
|
5,488 |
|
Commercial and industrial (3) |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
751,116 |
|
|
$ |
800,557 |
|
|
$ |
106,511 |
|
|
$ |
865,438 |
|
|
$ |
27,153 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
602,036 |
|
|
$ |
602,036 |
|
|
$ |
49,493 |
|
|
$ |
607,713 |
|
|
$ |
22,855 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
13,471 |
|
|
|
13,471 |
|
|
|
1,868 |
|
|
|
13,987 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
Construction |
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
HELOC |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
234,535 |
|
|
|
331,588 |
|
|
|
54,260 |
|
|
|
363,709 |
|
|
|
7,612 |
|
Commercial and industrial (3) |
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
3,320 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
853,077 |
|
|
$ |
950,340 |
|
|
$ |
106,511 |
|
|
$ |
990,587 |
|
|
$ |
31,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes interest income recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the
year ended December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Consumer loans included: residential first mortgage, second mortgage, construction and
HELOC loans. Commercial loans include: commercial real estate and commercial and
industrial. |
|
(3) |
|
These impaired loans are from originations prior to 2011. |
The Company utilizes an internal risk rating system on loans. Descriptions of the
Companys internal risk ratings as they relate to credit quality are as follows:
Pass. Pass assets are not impaired nor do they have any known deficiencies that could impact
the quality of the asset.
Special mention. Assets identified as special mention possess credit deficiencies or potential
weaknesses deserving managements close attention. Special mention assets have a potential
weakness or pose an unwarranted financial risk that, if not corrected, could weaken the assets and
increase risk in the future.
Substandard. Assets identified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net
worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so
classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses. They are characterized by the distinct
possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
26
Doubtful. Assets identified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified
substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in
full, on the basis of current existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and
improbable. The possibility of a loss on a doubtful asset is high. However, due to important and
reasonably specific pending factors, which may work to strengthen (or weaken) the asset, its
classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status can be determined.
For consumer loans, the Company evaluates credit quality based on the aging and status of
payment activity. This is reflected in a designation of either performing or non-performing.
Commercial Credit Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Commercial Real |
|
|
Commercial and |
|
|
Commercial Lease |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
600,560 |
|
|
$ |
93,480 |
|
|
$ |
31,927 |
|
|
$ |
725,967 |
|
Special mention/watch |
|
|
339,681 |
|
|
|
4,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,758 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
170,729 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,345 |
|
Doubtful |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,111,132 |
|
|
$ |
99,173 |
|
|
$ |
31,927 |
|
|
$ |
1,242,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Credit Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Residential First |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Second Mortgage |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Warehouse |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
3,502,823 |
|
|
$ |
149,295 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
512,330 |
|
|
$ |
4,164,448 |
|
Special mention/watch |
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
798 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
240,721 |
|
|
|
6,242 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
249,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,744,342 |
|
|
$ |
155,537 |
|
|
$ |
898 |
|
|
$ |
513,678 |
|
|
$ |
4,414,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
Other Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Performing |
|
$ |
236,184 |
|
|
$ |
76,764 |
|
|
$ |
312,948 |
|
Non-performing |
|
|
5,212 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
241,396 |
|
|
$ |
77,052 |
|
|
$ |
318,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Credit Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Commercial Real |
|
|
Commercial and |
|
|
|
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
Total Commercial |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
609,239 |
|
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
|
$ |
612,176 |
|
Special mention/watch |
|
|
430,714 |
|
|
|
4,174 |
|
|
|
434,888 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
210,245 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
212,009 |
|
Doubtful |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,250,301 |
|
|
$ |
8,875 |
|
|
$ |
1,259,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Credit Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Residential First |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Second Mortgage |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Warehouse |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
3,713,761 |
|
|
$ |
167,309 |
|
|
$ |
4,991 |
|
|
$ |
718,484 |
|
|
$ |
4,604,545 |
|
Special mention/watch |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
69,950 |
|
|
|
7,480 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
82,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,784,700 |
|
|
$ |
174,789 |
|
|
$ |
8,012 |
|
|
$ |
720,770 |
|
|
$ |
4,688,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
Other Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Performing |
|
$ |
264,612 |
|
|
$ |
85,889 |
|
|
$ |
350,501 |
|
Non-performing |
|
|
6,713 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
7,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
271,325 |
|
|
$ |
86,710 |
|
|
$ |
358,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Note 8 Pledged Assets
The Company has pledged certain securities and loans to collateralize lines of credit and/or
borrowings with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the FHLB of Indianapolis and other
potential future obligations. The following table details pledged asset by asset class, and the
carrying value of pledged investments and the investments maturities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash pledged for letter of credit |
|
$ |
17,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury bonds |
|
|
49,840 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
158,754 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
Securities classified as available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
2015-2032 |
|
Non-agencies securities
obligations |
|
|
121,484 |
|
|
|
2036 |
|
|
|
136,707 |
|
|
|
2036 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage loans |
|
|
4,669,583 |
|
|
Various |
|
|
5,122,456 |
|
|
Various |
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
130,200 |
|
|
Various |
|
|
202 |
|
|
Various |
Consumer loans |
|
|
220,694 |
|
|
Various |
|
|
253,030 |
|
|
Various |
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
434,491 |
|
|
Various |
|
|
554,382 |
|
|
Various |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans repurchased with government guarantees |
|
|
1,579,464 |
|
|
Various |
|
|
1,578,225 |
|
|
Various |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
7,092,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,821,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 Private-label Securitization Activity
The Company previously securitized fixed and adjustable rate second mortgage loans and home
equity line of credit loans. The Company acted as the principal underwriter of the beneficial
interests that were sold to investors. The financial assets were derecognized when they were
transferred to the securitization trust, which then issued and sold mortgage-backed securities to
third party investors. The Company relinquished control over the loans at the time the financial
assets were transferred to the securitization trust. The Company recognized a gain on the sale on
the transferred assets.
The Companys retained interests in the securitized mortgage loans and trusts, generally
consist of residual interests, transferors interests, and servicing assets. The residual
interests represent the present value of future cash flows expected to be received by the Company.
Residual interests are accounted for at fair value and are included as securities classified as
trading in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Any gains or losses realized on
the sale of such securities and any subsequent changes in unrealized gains and losses are reported
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. At June 30, 2011, the Companys residual interests
were deemed to have no value. Transferors interests represent draws on the HELOCs subsequent to
them being sold to the trusts that were funded by the Bank rather than being purchased by the
trusts. Transferors interests are included in loans held-for-investment in the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition. At June 30, 2011, the Company no longer serviced any of the
loans that were sold to the private-label securitization trusts, and therefore had no servicing
assets accounted for on an amortized cost method. For more information, please refer to our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
During 2010 and for the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company did not engage in any
private-label securitization activity.
Summary of Securitization Activity
Certain cash flows received from the securitization trusts were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees received |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,269 |
|
28
The following table sets forth certain characteristics of each of the securitizations at
their inception and the current characteristics as of and for the six month period ended June 30,
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-1 |
|
|
2006-2 |
|
HELOC Securitizations |
|
At Inception |
|
|
Current Levels |
|
|
At Inception |
|
|
Current Levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of loans |
|
|
8,155 |
|
|
|
2,767 |
|
|
|
4,186 |
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
Aggregate principal balance |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
126,983 |
|
|
$ |
302,182 |
|
|
$ |
130,094 |
|
Average principal balance |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
Weighted average fully indexed
interest rate |
|
|
8.43 |
% |
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
9.43 |
% |
|
|
6.67 |
% |
Weighted average original term |
|
120 months |
|
120 months |
|
120 months |
|
120 months |
Weighted average remaining
term |
|
112 months |
|
48 months |
|
112 months |
|
62 months |
Weighted average original
credit score |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
Transferors Interests
Under the terms of the HELOC securitizations, the trusts were initially obligated to purchase
any subsequent draws on the lines of credit out of funds available through principal payments on
such loans. However, as the securitizations are now in rapid amortization, the trusts no longer
purchase such draws from the Bank. Instead, the Bank funds the draws pursuant to the underlying
lines of credit with the borrowers, and receives a pro rata beneficial interest in the underlying
loans (transferors interest). The table below identifies the unpurchased draw contributions from
the Bank for each of the HELOC securitization trusts as well as the fair value of the transferors
interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Summary of Transferors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest by Securitization |
|
FSTAR 2005-1 |
|
|
FSTAR 2006-2 |
|
|
FSTAR 2005-1 |
|
|
FSTAR 2006-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total draw contribution |
|
$ |
35,306 |
|
|
$ |
51,179 |
|
|
$ |
35,088 |
|
|
$ |
50,949 |
|
Additional balance increase amount (1) |
|
$ |
27,687 |
|
|
$ |
31,887 |
|
|
$ |
28,219 |
|
|
$ |
33,407 |
|
Transferors interest ownership percentage |
|
|
20.81 |
% |
|
|
22.84 |
% |
|
|
19.59 |
% |
|
|
21.75 |
% |
Fair value of transferors interests |
|
$ |
12,472 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,439 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Transferors interest reserve |
|
$ |
1,376 |
|
|
$ |
1,632 |
|
|
$ |
1,876 |
|
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represent the draw contributions minus the pro-rata share allocated to the Company,
which effectively represents the dollar value of underlying ownership in the Trust. |
FSTAR 2005-1. At June 30, 2011, outstanding claims due to the note insurer were $12.0
million and based on the Companys internal model, the Company believed that because of the claims
due to the note insurer and continuing credit losses on the loans underlying the securitization,
the fair value/carrying amount of the transferors interest was $12.5 million. During the third
quarter of 2010, the Company determined that the transferors interests had deteriorated to the
extent that a contingent liability was required to be recorded. The Company recorded a liability to
reflect the expected liability arising from losses on future draws associated with this
securitization, of which $1.4 million remained at June 30, 2011. In determining this liability, the
Company assumed (i) no further draws would be made with respect to those HELOCs as to which further
draws were currently prohibited, (ii) the remaining HELOCs would continue to operate in the same
manner as their historical draw behavior indicated, as measured on an individual loan basis and on
a pool drawdown basis, and (iii) that any draws actually made and therefore recognized as
transferors interests by the Company would have a loss rate of 55.0 percent.
FSTAR 2006-2. At June 30, 2011, outstanding claims due to the note insurer were $76.5 million
and based on the Companys internal model, the Company believed that because of the claims due to
the note insurer and continuing credit losses on the loans underlying the securitization, there was
no carrying amount of the transferors interest. Also, during the fourth quarter 2009, the Company
determined that the transferors interests had deteriorated to the extent that a liability was
required to be recorded. During the period, the Company recorded a liability of $7.6 million to
reflect the expected liability arising from losses on future draws associated with this
securitization, of which $1.6 million remained at June 30, 2011. In determining this liability,
the Company (i) assumed no further draws would be made with respect to those HELOCs as to which
further draws were currently prohibited, (ii) the remaining HELOCs would continue to operate in the
same manner as their historical draw behavior indicated, as measured on an individual loan basis
and on a pool drawdown basis, and (iii) that any draws actually made and therefore recognized as
transferors interests by the Company would have a loss rate of 100 percent.
29
The following table outlines the Companys expected losses on future draws on loans in FSTAR
2005-1 and FSTAR
2006-2 at June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Future |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Draws as % of |
|
|
Expected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential |
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
Future |
|
|
Expected |
|
|
Future |
|
|
|
Commitments (1) |
|
|
Commitments (2) |
|
|
Draws (3) |
|
|
Loss (4) |
|
|
Liability (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC Securitization |
|
$ |
4,751 |
|
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2,504 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,376 |
|
FSTAR 2006-2 HELOC Securitization |
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
49.7 |
% |
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unfunded commitments represent the amounts currently fundable at the dates indicated
because the underlying borrowers lines of credit are still active. |
|
(2) |
|
Expected future draws on unfunded commitments represents the historical draw rate within the
securitization. |
|
(3) |
|
Expected future draws reflects unfunded commitments multiplied by expected future draws
percentage. |
|
(4) |
|
Expected losses represent an estimated reduction in carrying value of future draws. |
|
(5) |
|
Potential future liability reflects expected future draws multiplied by expected losses. |
Assured Litigation
In 2009 and 2010, the Bank received repurchase demands from Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.,
formerly known as Financial Security Assurance Inc. (Assured), with respect to HELOCs that were
sold by the Bank in connection with the HELOC securitizations. Assured is the note insurer for
each of the two HELOC securitizations completed by the Bank. The Bank provided detailed rebuttals
to these demands. In April 2011, Assured filed a lawsuit against the Company, alleging a breach of
various loan-level representations and warranties and seeking relief for breach of contract, as
well as full indemnification and reimbursement of amounts that it had paid under the respective
insurance policy (which amounts were estimated by Assured to be in excess of $80 million), plus
interest and costs. In May 2011, the Company filed a motion with the court to dismiss the lawsuit,
asserting Assured was limited to the sole remedy of transferring deficiency amounts to the related
securitization trust under the terms of the agreements, and that with regard to charged off loans,
the deficiency amount is defined to be zero. On July 7, 2011, the court issued its order on the
motion, dismissing Assureds claims for indemnification and reimbursement, but allowing the case to
proceed on the breach of contract claims. However, the court further limited Assureds breach of
contract claims to those related to enforcing the Companys cure or repurchase obligations. To
the extent, if any, the Bank repurchases loans from or provides indemnification with the FSTAR
2005-1 HELOC Securitization trust, the Bank expects that the fair value of its transferors
interest held with respect to the FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC Securitization will increase by a like amount.
Unfunded Commitments
The table below identifies separately for each HELOC securitization trust: (i) the notional
amount of the total unfunded commitment under the Companys contractual arrangements, (ii) unfunded
commitments that have been frozen or suspended because the borrowers do not currently meet the
contractual requirements under their home equity line of credit with the Company, and (iii) the
amount currently fundable because the underlying borrowers lines of credit are still active:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
FSTAR 2005-1 |
|
|
FSTAR 2006-2 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Notional amount of unfunded commitments (1) |
|
$ |
37,112 |
|
|
$ |
32,805 |
|
|
$ |
69,917 |
|
Less: Frozen or suspended unfunded commitments |
|
|
32,361 |
|
|
|
29,520 |
|
|
|
61,881 |
|
Unfunded commitments still active |
|
|
4,751 |
|
|
|
3,285 |
|
|
|
8,036 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys total potential funding obligation is dependent on both (a) borrower behavior
(e.g., the amount of additional draws requested) and (b) the contractual draw period
(remaining term) available to the borrowers. Because borrowers can make principal payments and
restore the amounts available for draws and then borrow additional amounts as long as their
lines of credit remain active, the funding obligation has no specific limitation and it is not
possible to define the maximum funding obligation. However, we expect that the maturity dates
of the FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC securitization and the FSTAR 2006-2 HELOC Securitization pools will
be reached in 2015 and 2017, respectively, and our exposure will be substantially mitigated at
such times, based on prepayment speeds and losses in our cash flow forecast. |
Credit Risk on Securitization
With respect to the issuance of private-label securitizations, the Company retains certain
limited credit exposure in that it retains non-investment grade residual securities in addition to
customary representations and warranties. The Company does not have credit exposure associated
with non-performing loans in securitizations beyond its investment in retained interests in
non-investment grade residuals and draws (transferors interests) on HELOCs that it funds and which
are not reimbursed by the
30
respective trust. The value of the Companys transferors interests
reflects the Companys credit loss assumptions as applied to the underlying collateral pool. To
the extent that actual credit losses exceed the assumptions, the value of the Companys
non-investment grade residual securities and unreimbursed draws will be diminished.
During the fourth quarter 2010, all servicing related to loans underlying the private-label
securitizations (i.e., HELOC and second mortgage loans) was transferred to a third party servicer.
The following table summarizes the Companys consumer servicing portfolio and the balance of
retained assets with credit exposure, which includes residential interests that are included as
trading securities and unreimbursed HELOC draws that are included in loans held-for-investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of Retained |
|
|
|
Amount of Loans |
|
|
Assets With Credit |
|
|
Amount of Loans |
|
|
Assets With Credit |
|
|
|
Serviced |
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
Serviced |
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Private-label securitizations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,472 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,439 |
|
Loans that have been securitized in private-label securitizations that are serviced by
the Company and are sixty days or more past due, all of which are consumer loans, and the credit
losses incurred in the securitization trusts are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Principal |
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
|
Credit Losses |
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
(Net of Recoveries) For |
|
|
|
Loans Outstanding |
|
|
60 Days or More Past Due |
|
|
the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
mortgage loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
849,187 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,461 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Company has obligations to service residential first mortgage loans. Prior to December 31,
2010, the Company had obligations to service consumer loans (HELOC and second mortgage loans)
resulting from private-label securitization transactions. A description of these classes of
servicing assets follows.
Residential mortgage servicing rights. Servicing of residential first mortgage loans is a
significant business activity of the Company. The Company recognizes MSR assets on residential
first mortgage loans when it retains the obligation to service these loans upon sale. MSRs are
subject to changes in value from, among other things, changes in interest rates, prepayments of the
underlying loans and changes in credit quality of the underlying portfolio. In the past, the
Company treated this risk as a general counterbalance to the increased production and gain on loan
sale margins that tend to occur in an environment with increased prepayments. However, in 2008,
the Company elected the fair value option for residential first mortgage servicing rights. As
such, the Company currently specifically hedges certain risks of fair value changes of MSRs using
derivative instruments that are intended to change in value inversely to part or all of the changes
in the components underlying the fair value of MSRs.
31
Changes in the carrying value of residential first mortgage MSRs, accounted for at fair value,
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
580,299 |
|
|
$ |
649,133 |
|
Additions from loans sold with servicing retained |
|
|
88,954 |
|
|
|
93,392 |
|
Reductions from bulk sales(1) |
|
|
(47,135 |
) |
|
|
(115,128 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payoffs(2) |
|
|
(28,466 |
) |
|
|
(31,392 |
) |
All other changes in valuation inputs or assumptions(3) |
|
|
(16,251 |
) |
|
|
(122,281 |
) |
|
|
|
Fair value of MSRs at end of period |
|
$ |
577,401 |
|
|
$ |
473,724 |
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance of residential first mortgage loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
57,087,989 |
|
|
$ |
49,536,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects sales related to underlying serviced loans totaling $4.7 billion and $10.8 billion, respectively, for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents decrease in MSR value associated with loans that were paid off during the period. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents estimated MSR value change resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates. |
The fair value of residential MSRs is estimated using a valuation model that calculates
the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration expected
mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors, which
are determined based on current market conditions. The Company periodically obtains third-party
valuations of residential MSRs to assess the reasonableness of the fair value calculated by the
valuation model.
The key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value of those MSRs capitalized
during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Weighted-average constant prepayment rate |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
The key economic assumptions reflected in the overall fair value of the entire portfolio
of MSRs were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Weighted-average constant prepayment rate |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
Consumer servicing assets. Consumer servicing assets represented servicing rights related to
HELOC and second mortgage loans that were created in the Companys private-label securitizations.
These servicing assets were initially measured at fair value and subsequently accounted for using
the amortization method. Under this method, the assets were amortized in proportion to and over
the period of estimated servicing income and were evaluated for impairment on a periodic basis.
When the carrying value exceeds the fair value, a valuation allowance was established by a charge
to loan administration income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The fair value of consumer servicing assets was estimated by using an internal valuation
model. This method was based on calculating the present value of estimated future net servicing
cash flows, taking into consideration discount rates, actual and expected loan prepayment rates,
servicing costs and other economic factors.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company transferred its mortgage servicing rights with
respect to its private label securitizations, i.e., related to HELOC and second mortgage loans, to
a third-party servicer pursuant to the terms of the applicable servicing agreements. As a result,
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company did not hold any mortgage servicing rights
related to such securitizations.
32
Changes in the carrying value of the consumer servicing assets and the associated valuation
allowance follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Consumer servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
7,049 |
|
Reduction from transfer of servicing (1) |
|
|
(5,075 |
) |
Amortization |
|
|
(884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Carrying value before valuation allowance at end of period |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
(3,808 |
) |
Impairment recoveries (charges) |
|
|
64 |
|
Reduction from transfer of servicing (1) |
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value of servicing assets at end of period |
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance of consumer loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
849,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of servicing assets: |
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the transfer of mortgage servicing rights related to the Companys
private-label securitizations. |
The key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these servicing assets
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Contractual servicing fees. Contractual servicing fees, including late fees and
ancillary income, for each type of loan serviced are presented below. Contractual servicing fees
are included within loan administration income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
42,727 |
|
|
$ |
36,420 |
|
|
$ |
86,314 |
|
|
$ |
73,762 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
42,762 |
|
|
$ |
37,611 |
|
|
$ |
86,382 |
|
|
$ |
76,154 |
|
|
|
|
33
Note 11 FHLB Advances
The portfolio of FHLB advances includes floating rate daily adjustable advances and fixed rate
term advances. The following is a breakdown of the advances outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Daily adjustable advances |
|
$ |
6,571 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
$ |
325,083 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
% |
Long-term fixed rate term advances |
|
|
3,400,000 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
3,400,000 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,406,571 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
$ |
3,725,083 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end |
|
$ |
3,406,571 |
|
|
$ |
3,900,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,406,571 |
|
|
$ |
3,900,000 |
|
Average balance |
|
|
3,402,190 |
|
|
|
3,816,667 |
|
|
|
3,401,221 |
|
|
|
3,858,333 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
4.28 |
% |
At June 30, 2011, the Company has the authority and approval from the FHLB to utilize a
total of $7.0 billion in collateralized borrowings. At June 30, 2011, the line was collateralized
to $4.4 billion. Pursuant to collateral agreements with the FHLB, advances are collateralized by
non-delinquent single-family residential first mortgage loans, loans repurchased with government
guarantees, second mortgages, consumer loans and investment securities.
Note 12 Long-Term Debt
The Companys long-term debt is comprised principally of junior subordinated notes which were
issued in connection with the issuance of trust preferred securities. The following table presents
the outstanding balance and related interest rates of the long-term debt as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Subordinated Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating 3 Month LIBOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus 3.25% (1), matures 2032 |
|
$ |
25,774 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
$ |
25,774 |
|
|
|
3.55 |
% |
Plus 3.25% (1), matures 2033 |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
% |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
% |
Plus 3.25% (1), matures 2033 |
|
|
25,780 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
25,780 |
|
|
|
3.55 |
% |
Plus 2.00% (1), matures 2035 |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
% |
Plus 2.00% (1), matures 2035 |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
% |
Plus 1.75% (1), matures 2035 |
|
|
51,547 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
51,547 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
Plus 1.50% (1), matures 2035 |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
1.79 |
% |
Plus 1.45%, matures 2037 |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
Plus 2.50%, matures 2037 |
|
|
15,464 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
15,464 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
247,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
247,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed 7.00% due 2013 |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
248,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
248,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities are currently callable by the Company. |
Interest on all junior subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities is
payable quarterly. Under these arrangements, the Company has the right to defer dividend payments
to the trust preferred security holders for up to five years.
34
Note 13 Income Taxes
The Companys net deferred tax asset position has been entirely offset by a valuation
allowance amounting to $365.3 million and $330.8 million, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. A valuation allowance is established when management determines that it is more
likely than not that all or a portion of the Companys net deferred tax assets will not be realized
in future periods.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the net provision (benefit) for federal income taxes
as a percentage of pretax loss was 0.4 percent as compared to a provision (benefit) of zero percent
for the comparable 2010 period. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the variance to the
statutory rate of 35 percent was attributable to a $25.0 million addition to valuation allowance
for net deferred tax assets, certain non-deductible-corporate expenses of $0.4 million and
non-deductible warrant income of $(0.7) million. The variance for the three months ended June 30,
2010 was attributable to a $32.8 million addition to valuation allowance for net deferred tax
assets, certain non-deductible-corporate expenses of $0.7 million and non-deductible warrant
expense of $(1.2) million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the net provision (benefit) for federal income taxes
as a percentage of pretax loss was 0.5 percent as compared to a provision (benefit) of zero percent
for the comparable 2010 period. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the variance to the
statutory rate of 35 percent was attributable to a $34.5 million addition to valuation allowance
for net deferred tax assets, certain non-deductible-corporate expenses of $0.8 million and
non-deductible warrant income of $(1.0) million. The variance for the six months ended June 30,
2010 was attributable to a $59.0 million addition to valuation allowance for net deferred tax
assets, certain non-deductible-corporate expenses of $1.0 million and non-deductible warrant
expense of $(0.8) million.
The Companys income tax returns are subject to examination by federal, state and local
government authorities. On an ongoing basis, numerous federal, state and local examinations are in
progress and cover multiple tax years. As of June 30, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service had
completed its examination of the Companys income tax returns through the years ended December 31,
2005 and is in process of examining income tax returns for years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and
2008. The years open to examination by state and local government authorities vary by
jurisdiction.
Note 14 Warrant Liabilities
May Investors
In full satisfaction of the Companys obligations under anti-dilution provisions applicable to
certain investors (the May Investors) in the Companys May 2008 private placement capital raise,
the Company granted warrants (the May Investor Warrants) to the May Investors on January 30, 2009
for the purchase of 1,425,979 of Common Stock at $6.20 per share. The holders of such warrants are
entitled to acquire shares of Common Stock for a period of ten years. During 2009, May Investors
exercised May Investor Warrants to purchase 314,839 shares of Common Stock. As a result of the
Companys registered offering on March 31, 2010, of 57.5 million shares of Common Stock at a price
per share of $5.00, the number of shares of the Companys Common Stock issuable to the May
Investors under the May Investor Warrants was increased by 266,674 and the exercise price was
decreased to $5.00 pursuant to the antidilution provisions of the May Investors Warrants. As a
result of the Companys registered offering on November 2, 2010 of 115.7 million shares of Common
Stock at a price per share of $1.00, the number of shares of Common Stock issuable to the May
Investors under the May Investor Warrants was increased by 5,511,255 and the exercise price was
decreased to $1.00 pursuant to the antidilution provisions of the May Investors Warrants. For the
six month period ended June 30, 2011, no shares of Common Stock were issued upon exercise of May
Investor Warrants, and at June 30, 2011, the May Investors held warrants to purchase 6,889,069
shares at an exercise price of $1.00.
Management believes the May Investor Warrants do not meet the definition of a contract that is
indexed to the Companys own stock under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, the May Investor Warrants are
classified as liabilities rather than as an equity instrument and are measured at fair value, with
changes in fair value recognized through operations.
On January 30, 2009, in conjunction with the capital investments, the Company recorded the May
Investor Warrants at their fair value of $6.1 million. From the issuance of the May Investor
Warrants on January 30, 2009 through June 30, 2011, the Company marked these warrants to market
which resulted in a decrease in the liability during this time of $0.4 million. This decrease was
recorded as warrant (income) expense included in non-interest expense.
At June 30, 2011, the Companys liabilities to the holders of May Investors Warrants amounted
to $6.5 million. The warrant liabilities are included in other liabilities in the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition.
35
Treasury Warrants
On January 30, 2009, the Company sold to the U.S. Treasury 266,657 shares of Series C fixed
rate cumulative non-convertible perpetual preferred stock (Series C Preferred Stock) and a
warrant to purchase up to approximately 6.5 million shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of
$6.20 per share (the Treasury Warrant) for $266.7 million. The issuance and the sale of the
Series C Preferred Stock and Treasury Warrant were exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Series C Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and
pays cumulative dividends quarterly at a rate of 5 percent per annum for the first five years, and
9 percent per annum thereafter. The Treasury Warrant became exercisable upon receipt of stockholder
approval on May 26, 2009 and has a ten-year term.
Note 15 Stockholders Equity
Preferred Stock
Preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 and a liquidation value of $1,000 and additional
paid in capital attributable to preferred stock at June 30, 2011 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earliest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Series C
Preferred Stock,
TARP Capital
Purchase Program |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
January 31, 2012 |
|
|
266,657 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
251,956 |
|
On January 30, 2009, the Company sold to the U.S. Treasury, 266,657 shares of the Series C
Preferred Stock for $266.7 million and the Treasury Warrant. The Series C Preferred Stock and
Treasury Warrant qualify as Tier 1 capital. The Series C Preferred Stock pays cumulative dividends
quarterly at a rate of 5 percent per annum for the first five years, and 9 percent per annum
thereafter. The Treasury Warrant is exercisable over a 10 year period. Because the Company did
not have an adequate number of authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock at January 30, 2009
or at March 31, 2009, the Company was required to initially classify such Treasury Warrant as a
liability and record the Treasury Warrant at its fair value of $27.7 million. Upon receipt of
stockholder approval to authorize an adequate number of shares of Common Stock on May 26, 2009, the
Company reclassified the Treasury Warrant to stockholders equity. The Series C Preferred Stock
and additional paid in capital attributable to Series C Preferred Stock was recorded in
stockholders equity as the difference between the cash received from the U.S. Treasury and the
amount initially recorded as a warrant liability, or $239.0 million. The discount on the Series C
Preferred Stock is represented by the initial fair value of the Treasury Warrant. This discount is
being accreted to additional paid in capital attributable to Series C Preferred Stock over five
years using the interest method and such discount is included as a current period expense under
preferred stock dividend/accretion in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table sets forth the components in accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)
for each type of available-for-sale security:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax Amount |
|
|
(Expense) Benefit(1) |
|
|
After-Tax Amount |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale,
June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency securities |
|
$ |
25,581 |
|
|
$ |
(20,608 |
) |
|
$ |
4,973 |
|
U.S. government sponsored agency securities |
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
2006-1 securitization trust |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
(6,108 |
) |
|
|
(5,512 |
) |
|
|
|
Total net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
25,632 |
|
|
$ |
(25,988 |
) |
|
$ |
(356 |
) |
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale,
December 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency securities |
|
$ |
11,547 |
|
|
$ |
(20,608 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,061 |
) |
U.S. government sponsored agency securities |
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
2006-1 securitization trust |
|
|
(794 |
) |
|
|
(6,108 |
) |
|
|
(6,902 |
) |
|
|
|
Total net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
9,823 |
|
|
$ |
(25,988 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The income tax (expense) benefit reflects the amount which existed at the time the Company established the valuation allowance for deferred securities that were held at the date disposed or matured. |
36
The following table sets forth the changes to other comprehensive (loss) income and the
related tax effect for each component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Gain (reclassified to earnings) on sales of
securities available-
for-sale (net of tax $572 for the 2010 period) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,278 |
) |
Loss (reclassified to earnings) for other-than-temporary
impairment on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
15,584 |
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
27,582 |
|
|
|
|
Change in comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
$ |
15,809 |
|
|
$ |
24,981 |
|
|
|
|
Note 16 Loss Per Share
Basic loss per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing loss available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the
period. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or
other contracts to issue Common Stock were exercised and converted into Common Stock or resulted in
the issuance of Common Stock that could then share in the loss of the Company.
On May 27, 2010, the Companys stockholders approved an amendment to the Articles to effect a
reverse stock split of the Common Stock with the exact exchange ratio and timing of the reverse
stock split to be determined at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors. The Board of
Directors approved a 1-for-10 reverse stock split which became effective on May 27, 2010. In lieu
of fractional shares, stockholders received cash payments based on the Common Stocks closing price
on May 26, 2010 of $5.00 per share, which reflected the reverse stock split. The par value of the
Common Stock remained at $0.01 per share. Unless otherwise indicated, all Common Stock and related
per share amounts in these Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements are stated on an after-reverse-split basis for all periods presented.
The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share of Common
Stock for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Average Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share Amount |
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(70,168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(92,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Less: Preferred stock
dividend/accretion |
|
|
(4,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to Common
Stock |
|
|
(74,888 |
) |
|
|
553,946 |
|
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
(97,006 |
) |
|
|
153,298 |
|
|
|
(0.63 |
) |
Effect of Dilutive Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to Common
Stock |
|
$ |
(74,888 |
) |
|
|
553,946 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(97,006 |
) |
|
|
153,298 |
|
|
$ |
(0.63 |
) |
|
|
|
Due to the loss attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, the diluted loss per share calculation excludes all common stock equivalents,
including 13,340,448 shares and 7,565,482 shares, respectively, pertaining to warrants and
2,586,783 shares and 840,145 shares, respectively, pertaining to stock-based awards. The inclusion
of these securities would be anti-dilutive.
37
The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share of Common
Stock for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Average Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share Amount |
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(97,133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(169,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Less: Preferred stock
dividend/accretion |
|
|
(9,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to Common
Stock |
|
|
(106,562 |
) |
|
|
553,752 |
|
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(178,906 |
) |
|
|
115,707 |
|
|
|
(1.55 |
) |
Effect of Dilutive Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to Common
Stock |
|
$ |
(106,562 |
) |
|
|
553,752 |
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(178,906 |
) |
|
|
115,707 |
|
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
|
|
|
Due to the loss attributable to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, the diluted loss per share calculation excludes all common stock equivalents,
including 13,340,448 shares and 7,698,066 shares, respectively, pertaining to warrants and
2,630,963 shares and 779,613 shares, respectively, pertaining to stock-based awards. The inclusion
of these securities would be anti-dilutive.
Note 17 Derivative Financial Instruments
The following derivative financial instruments were identified and recorded at fair value as
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae and other forward loan sale contracts; |
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments; |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements; and |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury futures and options. |
The Company hedges the risk of overall changes in the fair value of loans held-for-sale and
rate lock commitments generally by selling forward contracts on securities of Fannie Mae, Freddie
Mac and Ginnie Mae. The forward contracts used to economically hedge the loan commitments are
accounted for as non-designated hedges and are intended to offset rate lock commitment
mark-to-market gains and losses recognized as a component of gain on loan sale. Derivatives are
included in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The Company
recognized a loss of $6.5 million and $25.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010 respectively, on its hedging activity relating to loan commitments and loans held-for-sale.
The Company recognized a loss of $47.5 million and $42.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010 respectively, on its hedging activity relating to loan commitments and loans
held-for-sale. Additionally, the Company hedges the risk of overall changes in fair value of MSRs
through the use of various derivatives including purchase forward contracts on securities of Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac and the purchase/sale of U.S. Treasury futures contracts and options on U.S.
Treasury futures contracts. These derivatives are accounted for as non-designated hedges against
changes in the fair value of MSRs. The Company recognized a gain of $36.6 million and $20.2
million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 respectively, on MSR fair value hedging
activities. The Company recognized a gain of $28.2 million and $49.8 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 respectively, on MSR fair value hedging activities.
The Company occasionally uses interest rate swap agreements to reduce its exposure to interest
rate risk inherent in a portion of the current and anticipated borrowings and advances. A swap
agreement is a contract between two parties to exchange cash flows based on specified underlying
notional amounts and indices. Under U.S. GAAP, the swap agreements used to hedge the Companys
anticipated borrowings and advances qualify as cash flow hedges. Derivative gains and losses
reclassed from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income to current period operations are
included in the line item in which the hedge cash flows are recorded. For the six month periods
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company derecognized cash flow hedges.
38
The Company had the following derivative financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Expiration Dates |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
$ |
2,064,443 |
|
|
$ |
10,920 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets |
|
$ |
2,064,443 |
|
|
$ |
10,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward agency and loan sales |
|
$ |
3,894,500 |
|
|
$ |
8,198 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
U.S. Treasury and agency forwards |
|
|
1,990,000 |
|
|
|
10,790 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
5,884,500 |
|
|
$ |
18,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
$ |
1,721,739 |
|
|
$ |
14,396 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Forward agency and loan sales |
|
|
3,942,673 |
|
|
|
35,820 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets |
|
$ |
5,664,412 |
|
|
$ |
50,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency futures |
|
$ |
2,770,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,088 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
2,770,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty credit risk. The Bank is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance
by the counterparties to its various derivative financial instruments. The Company manages this
risk by selecting only well-established, financially strong counterparties, spreading the credit
risk among such counterparties, and by placing contractual limits on the amount of unsecured credit
risk from any single counterparty.
Note 18 Segment Information
The Companys operations are generally conducted through two business segments: banking and
home lending. Each business operates under the same banking charter but is reported on a segmented
basis for this report. Each of the business lines is complementary to each other. The banking
operation includes the gathering of deposits and investing those deposits in duration-matched
assets primarily originated by the home lending operation. The banking group holds these loans in
the investment portfolio in order to earn income based on the difference or spread between the
interest earned on loans and the interest paid for deposits and other borrowed funds. The home
lending operation involves the origination, packaging, and sale of loans in order to receive
transaction income. The lending operation also services mortgage loans for others and sells MSRs
into the secondary market. Funding for the lending operation is provided by deposits and
borrowings garnered by the banking group. All of the non-bank consolidated subsidiaries are
included in the banking segment. No such subsidiary is material to the Companys overall
operations.
The following table presents financial information by business segment for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Home Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
38,840 |
|
|
$ |
25,258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,098 |
|
Gain on sale revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,549 |
|
Other (expense) income |
|
|
(2,312 |
) |
|
|
22,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income
and non-interest
income |
|
|
36,528 |
|
|
|
85,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,176 |
|
(Loss) earnings before
federal income taxes |
|
|
(86,498 |
) |
|
|
16,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,904 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
13,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,409 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
10,951,437 |
|
|
|
4,945,375 |
|
|
|
(3,234,000 |
) |
|
|
12,662,812 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
24,255 |
|
|
|
(24,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
8,903 |
|
|
$ |
33,502 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42,405 |
|
Gain on sale revenue |
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
132,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,174 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
13,26 |
|
|
|
(50,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income
and non-interest
income |
|
|
26,693 |
|
|
|
116,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,736 |
|
(Loss) earnings before
federal income taxes |
|
|
(139,000 |
) |
|
|
46,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,316 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
3,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,666 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
27,653 |
|
|
|
(26,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
12,092,856 |
|
|
|
4,325,974 |
|
|
|
(2,725,000 |
) |
|
|
13,693,830 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
20,438 |
|
|
|
(20,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
90,720 |
|
|
$ |
13,176 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
103,896 |
|
Gain on sale revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,547 |
|
Other income |
|
|
12,316 |
|
|
|
54,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income
and non-interest
income |
|
|
103,036 |
|
|
|
155,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,240 |
|
Loss before federal income taxes |
|
|
(110,980 |
) |
|
|
14,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,604 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
4,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,166 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
18,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,452 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
10,951,437 |
|
|
|
4,945,375 |
|
|
|
(3,234,000 |
) |
|
|
12,662,812 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
46,943 |
|
|
|
(46,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
57,431 |
|
|
$ |
22,658 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
80,089 |
|
Gain on sale revenue |
|
|
6,689 |
|
|
|
179,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,381 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
23,087 |
|
|
|
(37,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income
and non-interest
income |
|
|
87,207 |
|
|
|
165,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,417 |
|
Loss before federal income taxes |
|
|
(201,019 |
) |
|
|
(15,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,537 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,522 |
|
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,314 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
27,692 |
|
|
|
(23,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
12,092,856 |
|
|
|
4,325,974 |
|
|
|
(2,725,000 |
) |
|
|
13,693,830 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
41,063 |
|
|
|
(41,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues are comprised of net interest income (before the provision for loan losses) and
non-interest income. Non-interest expenses are fully allocated to each business segment. The
intersegment income (expense) consists of interest expense incurred for intersegment borrowing.
40
Note 19 Compensation Plans
Stock-Based Compensation
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded stock-based
compensation expense of $1.9 million and $1.6 million, respectively. For the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $3.6 million and $5.4
million, respectively.
Incentive Compensation Plan
Each year the compensation committee of the Board of Directors decides which employees of the
Company, who are not executive officers, will be eligible to participate in the Incentive
Compensation Plan and the size of the bonus pool. The Company incurred expenses of $1.5 million and
$3.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded an expense of $0.1 million and a reversal of
previously recorded expense of $(3.6) million, respectively.
Note 20 Legal Proceedings, Contingencies and Commitments
Legal Proceedings
The Company and certain subsidiaries are subject to various pending or threatened legal
proceedings arising out of the normal course of business or operations. Although there can be no
assurance as to the ultimate outcome, the Company, together with subsidiaries, believes it has
meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal
proceedings, including the matters described below, and with respect to such legal proceedings,
intends to continue to defend itself vigorously, litigating or settling cases according to
managements judgment as to the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
On at least a quarterly basis, the Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies in
connection with pending or threatened legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available.
On a case-by-case basis, reserves are established for those legal claims as to which the Company
believes it is probable that a loss may be incurred and that the amount of such loss can be
reasonably estimated.
Resolution of legal claims are inherently dependent on the specific facts and circumstances of
each specific case, and therefore the actual costs of resolving these claims may be substantially
higher or lower than the amounts reserved. Based on current knowledge, and after consultation with
legal counsel, management believes that current reserves are adequate and the amount of any
incremental liability that may otherwise arise is not expected to have a material adverse effect on
the Companys consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Certain legal claims
considered by the Company in its analysis of the sufficiency of its related reserves include the
following:
In February 2010, the Company was named in a putative class action alleging that it violated
its fiduciary duty pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) to employees
who participated in the Companys 401(k) plan (Plan) by continuing to offer Company stock as an
investment option after investment in the stock allegedly ceased to be prudent. On July 16, 2010,
the Company moved to dismiss the complaint and asserted, among other things, that the Plans
investment in employer stock was protected by a presumption of prudence under ERISA, and that
plaintiffs allegations failed to overcome such presumption. The parties submitted relevant
materials to the court as of February 2, 2011, and on March 31, 2011, the court granted the
Companys motion and dismissed the case. The plaintiffs have filed an appellate brief with the
court and the Company will be filing a reply brief.
In August 2010, the Bank was named in a collective action lawsuit alleging that it improperly
classified its mortgage underwriters as exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA), and thereby failed to properly compensate them for overtime. Collective action
certification was agreed upon after certain categories of employees were excluded from the class.
A notice to employees to opt in to the collective action was distributed in mid-February, with a
response required within the subsequent 60-day period. A total of 54 plaintiffs opted in to the
collective action in addition to the named plaintiff. In April 2011, the parties agreed to settle
the matter for $250,000 inclusive of attorneys fees and costs, contingent upon there being 10 or
less plaintiffs that reject the settlement within 30 days of being notified of the terms.
Plaintiffs did not object and the action is now settled.
41
From time to time, governmental agencies conduct investigations or examinations of various
mortgage related practices of the Bank. Currently, ongoing investigations relate to whether the
Bank violated laws or regulations relating to mortgage origination or servicing practices and to
whether its practices with regard to servicing residential first mortgage loans are adequate. The
Bank is cooperating with such agencies and providing information as requested. In addition, the
Bank has increasingly been named in civil actions throughout the country by borrowers and former
borrowers relating to the origination, purchase, sale and servicing of mortgage loans.
In the normal course, the Bank receives repurchase and indemnification demands from
counterparties involved with the purchase of residential first mortgages for alleged breaches of
representations and warranties. The Bank establishes a secondary marketing reserve in connection
with the estimated potential liability for such potential demands.
In 2009 and 2010, the Bank received repurchase demands from Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.,
formerly known as Financial Security Assurance Inc. (Assured), with respect to HELOCs that were
sold by the Bank in connection with the HELOC securitizations. Assured is the note insurer for
each of the two HELOC securitizations completed by the Bank. The Bank provided detailed rebuttals
to these demands. In April 2011, Assured filed a lawsuit against the Company, alleging a breach of
various loan-level representations and warranties and seeking relief for breach of contract, as
well as full indemnification and reimbursement of amounts that it had paid under the respective
insurance policy (which amounts were estimated by Assured to be in excess of $80 million), plus
interest and costs. In May 2011, the Company filed a motion with the court to dismiss the lawsuit,
asserting Assured was limited to the sole remedy of transferring deficiency amounts to the related
securitization trust under the terms of the agreements, and that with regard to charged off loans,
the deficiency amount is defined to be zero. On July 7, 2011, the court issued its order on the
motion, dismissing Assureds claims for indemnification and reimbursement, but allowing the case to
proceed on the breach of contract claims. However, the court further limited Assureds breach of
contract claims to those related to enforcing the Companys cure or repurchase obligations. To
the extent, if any, the Bank repurchases loans from or provides indemnification with the FSTAR
2005-1 HELOC Securitization trust, the Bank expects that the fair value of its transferors
interest held with respect to the FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC Securitization will increase by a like amount.
When establishing a reserve for contingent liabilities, the Company determines a range of
potential losses for each matter that is both probable and estimable, and records the amount it
considers to be the best estimate within the range. As of June 30, 2011, such reserve was $0.4
million. In addition, within the secondary marketing reserve, the Bank includes loans sold to the
non-agency securitization trusts. There may be further losses that could arise but the occurrence
of which is not probable or reasonably estimable, and therefore such amounts are not required to be
recognized. The Company estimates that such further losses could amount up to $30 million in the
aggregate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and based upon information currently available, advice
of counsel, available insurance coverage and established reserves, the Company believes that the
eventual outcome of the actions against the Company and/or its subsidiaries, including the matters
described above, will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, in the event of
unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of those matters, if
unfavorable, may be material to the Companys Consolidated Financial Condition, results of
operations, or liquidity, for any particular period.
Contingencies and Commitments
A summary of the contractual amount of significant commitments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commitments to extend credit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
$ |
2,064,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,722,000 |
|
HELOC trust commitments |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
76,000 |
|
Standby and commercial letters of credit |
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
41,000 |
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend. Since many of these commitments expire
without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash
flow requirements. Certain lending commitments for mortgage loans to be sold in the secondary
market are considered derivative instruments in accordance with accounting guidance ASC Topic 815,
Derivatives and Hedging. Changes to the fair value of these commitments as a result of changes
in interest rates are recorded on the Statements of Financial Condition as an other asset. The
commitments related to mortgage loans are included in mortgage loans in the above table.
The Company enters into forward contracts for the future delivery or purchase of agency and
loan sale contracts. These contracts are considered to be derivative instruments under U.S. GAAP.
Further discussion on derivative instruments is included in Note 17 Derivative Financial
Instruments.
42
The Company has unfunded commitments under its contractual arrangement with the HELOC
securitization trusts to fund future advances on the underlying home equity lines of credit. Refer to further
discussion of this issue as presented in Note 9 Private-label Securitization Activity.
Standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent
upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with
the third party, while commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce
and typically result in the commitment being drawn on when the underlying transaction is
consummated between the customer and the third party.
The credit risk associated with loan commitments, standby and commercial letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and is subject to normal
credit policies. Collateral may be obtained based on managements credit assessment of the
customer. The guarantee liability for standby and commercial letters of credit was $3.3 million at
June 30, 2011 and $3.8 million at December 31, 2010.
43
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Where we say we, us, or our, we usually mean Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. However, in some
cases, a reference to we, us, or our will include our wholly-owned subsidiary Flagstar Bank,
FSB, and Flagstar Capital Markets Corporation (FCMC), its wholly-owned subsidiary, which we
collectively refer to as the Bank.
General
We are a Michigan-based savings and loan holding company founded in 1993. Our business is
primarily conducted through our principal subsidiary, the Bank, a federally chartered stock savings
bank. At June 30, 2011, our total assets were $12.7 billion, making Flagstar the largest publicly
held savings bank in the Midwest and one of the top 15 largest savings banks in the United States.
We are considered a controlled company for New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) purposes because MP
Thrift Investments, L.P. (MP Thrift) held approximately 64.2 percent of our common stock as of
June 30, 2011.
As a savings and loan holding company, we are subject to regulation, examination and
supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) of the United States Department of the
Treasury (U.S. Treasury) through July 21, 2011 and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
(the Federal Reserve) thereafter. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of
Indianapolis and is subject to regulation, examination and supervision by the OTS through July 21,
2011 and the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) thereafter. The Bank is also subject to
regulation, examination and supervision by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and
the Banks deposits are insured by the FDIC through the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF).
We operate 162 banking centers (of which 27 are located in retail stores), including 113
located in Michigan, 22 located in Indiana and 27 located in Georgia. However, we have entered
into an agreement for the sale or lease of the 27 banking centers in Georgia to PNC Bank, N.A.,
part of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC). Of these, 98 facilities are owned and 64
facilities are leased. Through our banking centers, we gather deposits and offer a line of
consumer and commercial financial products and services to individuals and to small and middle
market businesses. We also gather deposits on a nationwide basis through our website,
FlagstarDirect.com, and provide deposit and cash management services to governmental units on a
relationship basis throughout our markets. We leverage our banking centers and internet banking to
cross-sell other products to existing customers and increase our customer base. At June 30, 2011,
we had a total of $7.4 billion in deposits, including $5.2 billion in retail deposits, $674.9
million in government funds, $703.2 million in wholesale deposits and $815.2 million in
company-controlled deposits.
We also operate 30 loan origination centers located in 15 states, which originate one-to-four
family residential first mortgage loans as part of our retail home lending business. These offices
employ approximately 181 loan officers. We also originate retail loans through referrals from our
162 retail banking centers, consumer direct call center and our website, flagstar.com.
Additionally, we have wholesale relationships with almost 1,900 mortgage brokers and approximately
1,100 correspondents, which are located in all 50 states and serviced by 135 account executives.
The combination of our retail, broker and correspondent channels gives us broad access to customers
across diverse geographies to originate, fulfill, sell and service our residential first mortgage
loan products. Our servicing activities primarily include collecting cash for principal, interest
and escrow payments from borrowers, and accounting for and remitting principal and interest
payments to investors and escrow payments to third parties.
The Bank is continuing its on-going strategic initiatives to increase commercial and specialty
lending, as well as other mortgage related initiatives, towards achieving its vision of
transforming to a super community bank by expanding the commercial banking division and by
extending commercial lending to the New England region. Management believes the expansion will
allow the Bank to leverage its retail banking franchise, and that the commercial and special
lending businesses should complement existing operations and contribute to the establishment of a
diversified mix of revenue streams.
Our earnings include net interest income from our retail banking activities, fee-based income
from services we provide customers, and non-interest income from sales of residential first
mortgage loans to the secondary market, the servicing of loans for others, and the sale of
servicing rights related to mortgage loans serviced for others. Approximately 98.2 percent of our
total loan origination during the six months ended June 30, 2011 represented mortgage loans that
were collateralized by residential first mortgages on single-family residences and were eligible
for sale through U.S. government-sponsored entities, or GSEs (a term generally used to refer
collectively or singularly to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae).
At June 30, 2011, we had 3,306 full-time equivalent salaried employees of which 316 were
account executives and loan officers.
44
Operating Segments
Our business is comprised of two operating segmentsbanking and home lending. Our banking
operation currently offers a line of consumer and commercial financial products and services to
individuals, small and middle market businesses and large corporate borrowers. Our home lending
operation originates, acquires, sells and services mortgage loans on one-to-four family residences.
Each operating segment supports and complements the operations of the other, with funding for the
home lending operation primarily provided by deposits and borrowings obtained through the banking
operation. Financial information regarding our two operating segments is set forth in Note 19 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data. A discussion of our two operating segments is set forth below.
Bank Operations
Our deposit-related banking operation is composed of two delivery channels: Retail Banking and
Government Banking.
|
|
|
Retail Banking consists of 162 banking centers located throughout Michigan and
also in Indiana (principally in the Indianapolis metropolitan area) and Georgia
(principally in the north Atlanta suburbs). However, we have entered into an agreement
for the sale or lease of the 27 banking centers in Georgia to PNC. |
|
|
|
Government Banking is engaged in providing deposit and cash management services
to governmental units on a relationship basis throughout Michigan, Indiana and Georgia. |
In addition to deposits, our banking operation may borrow funds by obtaining advances from the
FHLB or other federally backed institutions or by entering into repurchase agreements with
correspondent banks using investments as collateral.
Our banking operation may invest these funds in a variety of consumer and commercial loan
products. Commercial and industrial loans, consumer direct financing leases (specialty lending)
and various other financial products are available to small and middle market business, as well as
large corporate borrowers.
Home Lending Operations
Our home lending operation originates, acquires, sells and services one-to-four family
residential first mortgage loans. The origination or acquisition of residential first mortgage
loans constitutes our most significant lending activity. At June 30, 2011, approximately 52.4
percent of interest-earning assets were held in residential first mortgage loans on single-family
residences.
During 2010 and continuing into 2011, we were one of the countrys leading mortgage loan
originators. Three production channels were utilized to originate or acquire mortgage
loansRetail, Broker and Correspondent. Each production channel produces similar mortgage loan
products and applies, in most instances, the same underwriting standards. We expect to continue to
leverage technology to streamline the mortgage origination process and bring service and
convenience to brokers and correspondents. Eight sales support offices were maintained that assist
brokers and correspondents nationwide. We also continue to make increasing use of the Internet as
a tool to facilitate the mortgage loan origination process through each of our production channels.
Brokers, correspondents and home loan centers are able to register and lock loans, check the
status of in-process inventory, deliver documents in electronic format, generate closing documents,
and request funds through the Internet. Virtually all mortgage loans that closed in 2011 used the
Internet in the completion of the mortgage origination or acquisition process.
|
|
|
Retail. In a retail transaction, loans are originated through a nationwide network of
stand-alone home loan centers, as well as referrals from our retail banking centers and the
national call center. When loans are originated on a retail basis, the origination
documentation is completed inclusive of customer disclosures and other aspects of the
lending process and funding of the transaction is completed internally. At June 30, 2011,
we maintained 30 home loan centers and during the remainder of 2011 we expect to allocate
additional, dedicated home lending resources towards developing lending capabilities in the
retail banking centers and the consumer direct channel. At the same time, our centralized
loan processing gained efficiencies and allowed lending staff to focus on originations.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011 we closed $684.3 million of loans utilizing this
origination channel, which equaled 7.2 percent of total originations as compared to $855.4
million or 8.7 percent of total originations for the same period in 2010. |
|
|
|
Broker. In a broker transaction, an unaffiliated mortgage brokerage company completes
the loan paperwork, but the loans are underwritten on a loan-level basis to our
underwriting standards and we supply the funding for the loan at closing (also known as
table funding) thereby becoming the lender of record. Currently, we have active broker
relationships with over 1,800 mortgage brokerage companies located in all 50 states. For
the six months ended June 30, 2011, we closed $2.8 billion utilizing this origination
channel, which equaled 29.1 percent of total originations, as compared to $3.4 billion or
35.6 percent for the same period in 2010. |
45
|
|
|
Correspondent. In a correspondent transaction, an unaffiliated mortgage company
completes the loan paperwork and also supplies the funding for the loan at closing. After
the mortgage company has funded the transaction the loan is acquired, usually by us paying
the mortgage company a market price for the loan. Unlike several competitors, we do not
generally acquire loans in bulk amounts from correspondents but rather we acquire each
loan on a loan-level basis and each loan is required to be originated to our underwriting
guidelines. We have active correspondent relationships with over 1,000 companies,
including banks and mortgage companies, located in all 50 states. Over the years, we have
developed a competitive advantage as a warehouse lender, wherein lines of credit to
mortgage companies are provided to fund loans. Warehouse lending is not only a profitable,
stand-alone business for the Company, but also provides valuable synergies within our
correspondent channel. In todays marketplace, there is high demand for warehouse lending,
but there are only a limited number of experienced providers. We believe that offering
warehouse lines has provided a competitive advantage in the small to midsize correspondent
channel and has helped grow and build the correspondent business in a profitable manner.
(For example, for the six months period ended June 30, 2011, warehouse lines funded almost
65 percent of the loans in our correspondent channel.) We plan to continue to leverage
warehouse lending as a customer retention and acquisition tool throughout the remainder of
2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we closed $6.0 billion utilizing the
correspondent origination channel, which equaled 63.7 percent of total originations
compared to $5.4 billion or 55.7 percent originated for the same period in 2010. |
Underwriting
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we primarily originated residential first mortgage
loans for sale that conformed to the respective underwriting guidelines established by Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae (each an Agency or collectively the Agencies). Most of the loans
placed in the held-for-investment portfolio in the six months ended June 30, 2011 were comprised of
either loans that were repurchased or, on a very limited basis, loans that were originated to
facilitate the sale of our real estate owned (REO). During the second quarter there was an
increase in new jumbo originations that will close and be placed in portfolio during the third
quarter and thereafter.
Residential first mortgage loans
At June 30, 2011, most of our held-for-investment residential first mortgage loans represented
loans that were originated in 2008 or prior years with underwriting criteria that varied by product
and with the standards in place at the time of origination.
Set forth below is a table describing the characteristics of the residential first mortgage
loans in our held-for-investment portfolio at June 30, 2011, by year of origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of Origination |
|
Prior |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance (1) |
|
$ |
3,557,920 |
|
|
$ |
72,854 |
|
|
$ |
29,075 |
|
|
$ |
22,847 |
|
|
$ |
3,682,696 |
|
Average note rate |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
5.23 |
% |
|
|
4.74 |
% |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
4.66 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
Average original loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
75.1 |
% |
|
|
84.7 |
% |
|
|
73.2 |
% |
|
|
66.0 |
% |
|
|
75.2 |
% |
Average original combined
loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
71.7 |
% |
|
|
82.0 |
% |
|
|
73.9 |
% |
|
|
69.0 |
% |
|
|
71.9 |
% |
Underwritten with low or stated income documentation |
|
|
38.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
Residential first mortgage loans are underwritten on a loan-by-loan basis rather than on
a pool basis. Generally, residential first mortgage loans produced through our production channels
are reviewed by one of our in-house loan underwriters or by a contract underwriter employed by a
mortgage insurance company. However, a limited number of our correspondents have been delegated
underwriting authority but this has not comprised more than 13 percent of the loans originated in
any year. In all cases, loans must be underwritten to our underwriting standards. Any loan not
underwritten by our employees must be warranted by the underwriters employer, which may be a
mortgage insurance company or a correspondent mortgage company with delegated underwriting
authority. For further information, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010.
46
The following table identifies our held-for-investment mortgages by major category, at June
30, 2011. The housing price index (HPI) loan-to-value (LTV) is updated from the original LTV
based on Metropolitan Statistical Area-level Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight
(OFHEO) data. Loans categorized as subprime were initially originated for sale and comprised
only 0.1 percent of the portfolio of first liens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
|
Average Note |
|
|
Average Original |
|
|
Loan-to-Value |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Index LTV, as |
|
|
|
Balance (1) |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
FICO Score |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
recalculated(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1 ARM |
|
$ |
160,506 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
71.9 |
% |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
85.6 |
% |
5/1 ARM |
|
|
482,659 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
% |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
% |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
77.8 |
% |
7/1 ARM |
|
|
33,538 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
% |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
64.9 |
% |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
77.6 |
% |
Other ARM |
|
|
78,963 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
72.0 |
% |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
% |
Other amortizing |
|
|
986,196 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
% |
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
Interest only: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1 ARM |
|
|
225,870 |
|
|
|
3.59 |
% |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
89.5 |
% |
5/1 ARM |
|
|
1,069,349 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
73.0 |
% |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
88.9 |
% |
7/1 ARM |
|
|
81,780 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
72.9 |
% |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
% |
Other ARM |
|
|
47,086 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
75.0 |
% |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
96.1 |
% |
Other interest only |
|
|
424,513 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
74.2 |
% |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
100.4 |
% |
Option ARMs |
|
|
91,262 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
% |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
109.7 |
% |
Subprime |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1 ARM |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
10.30 |
% |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
92.2 |
% |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
75.6 |
% |
Other ARM |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
8.64 |
% |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
89.8 |
% |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
111.5 |
% |
Other subprime |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
8.71 |
% |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
% |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
% |
|
|
|
Total residential first
mortgage loans |
|
$ |
3,682,696 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
% |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
% |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
91.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
$ |
155,493 |
|
|
|
8.19 |
% |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
%(2) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
%(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC loans |
|
$ |
228,792 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
% |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
%(2) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
%(3) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects LTV because these are second liens. |
|
(3) |
|
Does not reflect any residential first mortgages that may be outstanding. Instead,
incorporates current loan balance as a portion of current HPI value. |
The following table sets forth characteristics of those loans in our held-for-investment
mortgage portfolio as of June 30, 2011 that were originated with less documentation than is
currently required. Loans as to which underwriting information was accepted from a borrower
without validating that particular item of information are referred to as low doc or stated.
Substantially all of those loans were underwritten with verification of employment but with the
related job income or personal assets, or both, stated by the borrower without verification of
actual amount. Those loans may have additional elements of risk because information provided by
the borrower in connection with the loan was limited. Loans as to which underwriting information
was supported by third party documentation or procedures are referred to as full doc and the
information therein is referred to as verified. Also set forth are different types of loans that
may have a higher risk of non-collection than other loans.
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low Doc |
|
|
|
% of Held-for- |
|
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
|
|
Investment Portfolio |
|
|
Balance (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Characteristics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SISA (stated income, stated asset) |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
$ |
133,067 |
|
SIVA (stated income, verified assets) |
|
|
15.21 |
% |
|
$ |
905,165 |
|
High LTV (i.e., at or above 95%) |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
$ |
8,813 |
|
Second lien products (HELOCs, Second mortgages) |
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
$ |
114,534 |
|
Loan types: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option ARM loans |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
$ |
59,587 |
|
Interest-only loans |
|
|
13.39 |
% |
|
$ |
796,683 |
|
Subprime (2) |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes loans with a FICO score of less than 620. |
Adjustable-rate mortgages loans. Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARM) loans
held-for-investment were originated using Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines as a base
framework, and the debt-to-income ratio guidelines and documentation typically followed the AUS
guidelines. Our underwriting guidelines were designed with the intent to minimize layered risk.
For more information, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010.
At June 30, 2011, we had $91.3 million of option power ARM loans in our held-for-investment
loan portfolio, and the amount of negative amortization reflected in the loan balances for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 was $7.8 million. The maximum balance that all option power ARMs could
reach cumulatively is $143.4 million.
Set forth below is a table describing the characteristics of our ARM loans in our
held-for-investment mortgage portfolio at June 30, 2011, by year of origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of Origination |
|
Prior |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance (1) |
|
$ |
2,220,726 |
|
|
$ |
11,828 |
|
|
$ |
16,493 |
|
|
$ |
22,513 |
|
|
$ |
2,271,560 |
|
Average note rate |
|
|
4.13 |
% |
|
|
5.16 |
% |
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
4.14 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
Average original loan-to-value
ratio |
|
|
74.9 |
% |
|
|
82.6 |
% |
|
|
69.5 |
% |
|
|
65.7 |
% |
|
|
74.8 |
% |
Average original combined
loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
71.2 |
% |
|
|
84.8 |
% |
|
|
68.8 |
% |
|
|
68.8 |
% |
|
|
71.3 |
% |
Underwritten with low or stated
income documentation |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
Set forth below is a table describing specific characteristics of option power ARMs in
our held-for-investment mortgage portfolio at June 30, 2011, which were originated in 2008 or
prior.
|
|
|
|
|
Year of Origination |
|
2008 and Prior |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Unpaid principal balance (1) |
|
$ |
91,262 |
|
Average note rate |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
721 |
|
Average original loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
70.4 |
% |
Average original combined loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
77.1 |
% |
Underwritten with low or stated income documentation |
|
$ |
59,587 |
|
Total principal balance with any accumulated negative amortization |
|
$ |
82,312 |
|
Percentage of total ARMS with any accumulated negative amortization |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Amount of net negative amortization (i.e., deferred interest)
accumulated as interest income during the six months ended June
30, 2011 |
|
$ |
7,816 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
48
Set forth below are the accumulated amounts of interest income arising from the net
negative amortization portion of loans during the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance of |
|
|
Amount of Net Negative |
|
|
|
Loans in Negative Amortization |
|
|
Amortization Accumulated as |
|
|
|
At Period End (1) |
|
|
Interest Income During Period |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
82,312 |
|
|
$ |
7,916 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
242,947 |
|
|
$ |
15,482 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
282,817 |
|
|
$ |
15,702 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
Set forth below are the frequencies at which the ARM loans outstanding at June 30, 2011,
will reprice:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reset frequency |
|
# of Loans |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
% of the Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Monthly |
|
|
137 |
|
|
$ |
28,062 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Semi-annually |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
394,852 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
Annually |
|
|
6,838 |
|
|
|
1,647,268 |
|
|
|
72.5 |
% |
No reset non-performing loans |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
201,378 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
8,836 |
|
|
$ |
2,271,560 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Set forth below as of June 30, 2011, are the amounts of the ARM loans in our
held-for-investment loan portfolio with interest rate reset dates in the periods noted. As noted
in the above table, loans may reset more than once over a three-year period. Accordingly, the
table below may include the same loans in more than one period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter |
|
|
2nd Quarter |
|
|
3rd Quarter |
|
|
4th Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,172 |
|
|
$ |
230,210 |
|
|
$ |
683,101 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
521,722 |
|
|
$ |
248,537 |
|
|
$ |
465,146 |
|
|
$ |
789,575 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
628,921 |
|
|
$ |
270,367 |
|
|
$ |
485,336 |
|
|
$ |
821,996 |
|
Later years (1) |
|
$ |
673,345 |
|
|
$ |
334,931 |
|
|
$ |
585,190 |
|
|
$ |
853,197 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Later years reflect one reset period per loan. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects loans that have reset through June 30, 2011. |
Interest only mortgage loans. Both adjustable and fixed term loans were offered with a
10 year interest only option. These loans were originated using Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
guidelines as a base framework. We generally applied the debt to income ratio guidelines and
documentation using the AUS Approve/Reject response requirements. For more information, please
refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Set forth below is a table describing the characteristics of the interest-only mortgage loans
at the dates indicated in our held-for-investment mortgage portfolio at June 30, 2011, by year of
origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of Origination |
|
Prior |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Unpaid principal balance (1) |
|
$ |
1,845,771 |
|
|
$ |
864 |
|
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,848,599 |
|
Average note rate (2) |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
|
5.37 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
4.43 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724 |
|
Average original loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
74.3 |
% |
|
|
82.1 |
% |
|
|
66.8 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
74.3 |
% |
Average original combined
loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
|
68.2 |
% |
|
|
66.7 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
73.1 |
% |
Underwritten with low or stated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income documentation |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
|
(2) |
|
As described earlier, interest only loans placed in portfolio in 2010 comprise loans that
were initially originated for sale. There are two loans in this population. |
49
Second mortgage loans. The majority of second mortgages we originated were closed in
conjunction with the closing of the residential first mortgages originated by us. We generally
required the same levels of documentation and ratios as with our residential first mortgages. For
second mortgages closed in conjunction with a residential first mortgage loan that was not being
originated by us, our allowable debt-to-income ratios for approval of the second mortgages were
capped at 40 percent to 45 percent. In the case of a loan closing in which full documentation was
required and the loan was being used to acquire the borrowers primary residence, we allowed a
combined loan-to-value (CLTV) ratio of up to 100 percent; for similar loans that also contained
higher risk elements, we limited the maximum CLTV to 90 percent. FICO floors ranged from 620 to
720, and fixed and adjustable rate loans were available with terms ranging from five to 20 years.
Set forth below is a table describing the characteristics of the second mortgage loans in our
held-for-investment portfolio at June 30, 2011, by year of origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of Origination |
|
Prior to 2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance (1) |
|
$ |
153,262 |
|
|
$ |
1,631 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
155,493 |
|
Average note rate |
|
|
8.21 |
% |
|
|
6.97 |
% |
|
|
6.89 |
% |
|
|
7.17 |
% |
|
|
8.19 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
Average original loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
Average original combined
loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
80.8 |
% |
|
|
90.6 |
% |
|
|
74.1 |
% |
|
|
97.1 |
% |
|
|
80.9 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
HELOC loans. The majority of home equity line of credit (HELOCs) were closed in
conjunction with the closing of related residential first mortgage loans originated and serviced by
us. Documentation requirements for HELOC applications were generally the same as those required of
borrowers for the residential first mortgage loans originated by us, and debt-to-income ratios were
capped at 50 percent. For HELOCs closed in conjunction with the closing of a residential first
mortgage loan that was not being originated by us, our debt-to-income ratio requirements were
capped at 40 percent to 45 percent and the LTV was capped at 80 percent. The qualifying payment
varied over time and included terms such as either 0.75 percent of the line amount or the interest
only payment due on the full line based on the current rate plus 0.5 percent. HELOCs were
available in conjunction with primary residence transactions that required full documentation, and
the borrower was allowed a CLTV ratio of up to 100 percent, for similar loans that also contained
higher risk elements, we limited the maximum CLTV to 90 percent. FICO floors ranged from 620 to
720. The HELOC terms called for monthly interest-only payments with a balloon principal payment
due at the end of 10 years. At times, initial teaser rates were offered for the first three
months.
Set forth below is a table describing the characteristics of the HELOCs in our
held-for-investment portfolio at June 30, 2011, by year of origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of Origination |
|
Prior |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance (1) |
|
$ |
227,964 |
|
|
$ |
663 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
228,792 |
|
Average note rate (2) |
|
|
5.26 |
% |
|
|
5.79 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
5.26 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
Average original loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
Average original combined loan-to-
value ratio |
|
|
70.5 |
% |
|
|
59.3 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
70.5 |
% |
N/A Not available
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
|
(2) |
|
Average note rate reflects the rate that is currently in effect. As these loans adjust on a
monthly basis, the average note rate could increase, but would not decrease, as in the current
market, the floor rate on virtually all of the loans is in effect. |
50
Commercial Loans
The following table identifies our commercial loan portfolio by major category and selected
criteria at June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Commercial Loans on |
|
|
|
Balance(1) |
|
|
Note Rate |
|
|
Non-accrual Status |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
849,935 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
% |
|
$ |
32,801 |
|
Adjustable rate |
|
|
267,014 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
% |
|
|
70,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate loans |
|
|
1,116,949 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
% |
|
$ |
103,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred fees and other |
|
|
(5,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate loans |
|
$ |
1,111,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
15,946 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
Adjustable rate |
|
|
83,573 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial loans |
|
$ |
99,519 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
% |
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred fees and other |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial loans |
|
$ |
99,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lease financing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
33,152 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
Net deferred fees and other |
|
|
(1,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial lease financing loans |
|
$ |
31,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse lines of credit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable rate |
|
$ |
522,040 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
$ |
28 |
|
Net deferred fees and other |
|
|
(8,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total warehouse lines of credit |
|
$ |
513,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include net deferred fees, premiums or discounts, and
other. |
At June 30, 2011, our commercial real estate loan portfolio totaled $1.1 billion, or 18.6
percent of our investment loan portfolio, our commercial and industrial loan portfolio was $99.2
million, or 1.7 percent of our investment loan portfolio, and our commercial lease financing
totaled $31.9 million, or 0.5 percent of our investment loan portfolio. At December 31, 2010, our
commercial real estate loan portfolio totaled $1.3 billion, or 19.8 percent of our investment loan
portfolio, and our commercial and industrial loan portfolio was $8.9 million, or 0.1 percent of our
investment loan portfolio.
At June 30, 2011, our total commercial loans were geographically concentrated in a few states,
with approximately $612.7 million (49.1 percent) of all commercial loans located in Michigan,
$146.0 million (11.7 percent) located in Georgia and $141.7 million (11.4 percent) located in
California.
The average loan balance in our total commercial portfolio was approximately $1.4 million for
the first six months ended June 30, 2011, with the largest loan being $42.4 million. There are
approximately 30 loans with more than $439.2 million of exposure, and those loans comprised
approximately 35.4 percent of the portfolio.
Commercial real estate loans. Our commercial real estate loan portfolio is primarily
comprised of seasoned commercial real estate loans that are collateralized by real estate
properties intended to be income-producing in the normal course of business.
The primary factors considered in past commercial real estate credit approvals were the
financial strength of the borrower, assessment of the borrowers management capabilities, industry
sector trends, type of exposure, transaction structure, and the general economic outlook.
Commercial real estate loans were made on a secured, or in limited cases, on an unsecured basis,
with a vast majority also being enhanced by personal guarantees of the principals of the borrowing
business. Assets used as collateral for secured commercial real estate loans required an appraised
value sufficient to satisfy our loan-to-value ratio requirements. We also generally required a
minimum debt-service-coverage ratio, other than for development loans, and considered the
enforceability and collectability of any relevant guarantees and the quality of the collateral.
As a result of the steep decline in originations, the commercial real estate lending division
completed its transformation from a production orientation into one in which the focus is on
working out troubled loans, reducing classified assets and taking pro-active steps to prevent
deterioration in performing loans. Toward that end, commercial real estate loan officers were
largely replaced by experienced workout officers and relationship managers. A comprehensive
review, including
51
customized workout plans, were prepared for all classified loans, and risk
assessments were prepared on a loan level basis for the entire commercial real estate portfolio.
Commercial and industrial loans. The Bank recently commenced a series of initiatives to
increase commercial and specialty lending, as well as other mortgage related initiatives, by
expanding the commercial banking division and by extending commercial lending to the New England
region. Management believes the expansion will allow the Bank to leverage its existing retail
banking network and banking franchise, and the commercial and special lending businesses should
complement existing operations and contribute to the establishment of a diversified mix of revenue
streams. In commercial lending, ongoing credit management is dependent upon the type and nature
of the loan. We monitor all significant exposures on a regular basis. Internal risk ratings are
assigned at the time of each loan approval and are assessed and updated with each monitoring event.
The frequency of the monitoring event is dependent upon the size and complexity of the individual
credit, but in no case less frequently than every 12 months. Current commercial collateral values
are updated more frequently if deemed necessary as a result of impairments of specific loan or
other credit or borrower specific issues. We continually review and adjust our risk rating
criteria and rating determination process based on actual experience. This review and analysis
process also contributes to the determination of an appropriate allowance for loan loss amount for
our commercial loan portfolio. We originated $124.3 million in commercial and specialty loans
during the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $12.2 million during the same period in
2010, due to the on-going initiatives to increase commercial, specialty, small business and
mortgage warehouse lending.
Commercial lease financing loans. Our commercial lease financing portfolio, which we refer to
as specialty lending, is comprised of equipment leased to customers in a direct financing lease.
The net investment in financing leases includes the aggregate amount of lease payments to be
received and the estimated residual values of the equipment, less unearned income. Income from
lease financing is recognized over the lives of the leases on an approximate level rate of return
on the unrecovered investment. The residual value represents the estimated fair value of the
leased asset at the end of the lease term. Unguaranteed residual values of leased assets are
reviewed at least annually for impairment. If any declines in residual values are determined to be
other-than-temporary they will be recognized in earnings in the period such determinations are
made. At June 30, 2011, our commercial lease financing loan portfolio was $31.9 million, or 0.5
percent of our investment loan portfolio.
Warehouse lending. We also continue to offer warehouse lines of credit to other mortgage
lenders. These commercial lines allow the lender to fund the closing of residential first mortgage
loans. Each extension or drawdown on the line is collateralized by the residential first mortgage
loan being funded, and in many cases, we subsequently acquire that loan. Underlying mortgage loans
must be originated based on our underwriting standards. These lines of credit are, in most cases,
personally guaranteed by one or more qualified principal officers of the borrower. The aggregate
amount of warehouse lines of credit granted to other mortgage lenders at June 30, 2011, was $1.7
billion, of which $522.0 million was outstanding, as compared to, $1.9 billion granted at December
31, 2010, of which $720.8 million was outstanding. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, our
warehouse lines funded almost 65 percent of the loans in our correspondent channel. There were 287
warehouse lines of credit to other mortgage lenders with an average size of $5.9 million at June
30, 2011, compared to 289 warehouse lines of credit with an average size of $6.5 million at
December 31, 2010.
52
Summary of Operations
Our net loss applicable to common stock for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $74.9
million (loss of $0.14 per diluted share) represents a decrease from the loss of $97.0 million
(loss of $0.63 diluted share) for the same period in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, our net loss was $106.6 million (loss of $0.19 per diluted share) and $178.9 million
(loss of $1.55 per diluted share), respectively. The net loss during the six months ended June 30,
2011 compared to the same period in 2010 was affected by the following factors:
|
|
|
Higher net interest income due to a decline in deposit and FHLB advance cost; |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses decreased by 48.7 percent from the six months ended
June 30, 2010, to $76.7 million, primarily due to a lower level of charge-offs of
residential first mortgage loans resulting from non-performing loan sales completed in
the fourth quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011; |
|
|
|
|
Net servicing revenue increased 344.7 percent from the six months ended June
30, 2010, to $69.8 million, primarily due to servicing fees, ancillary income, and
charges on our residential first mortgage servicing from an increase in the average
balance in the portfolio of loans serviced for others, slower than expected levels of
prepayments, and effective hedge performance; |
|
|
|
|
Asset resolution expense related to non-performing residential first mortgage
and commercial loans decreased by 18.4 percent, to $61.4 million, primarily due to a
decrease in our provision for losses on real estate owned; |
|
|
|
|
Loan interest income decreased by $31.9 million, to $200.3 million; |
|
|
|
|
Lower gain on loan sales due to decreased volume, a less favorable interest
rate environment and a decrease in overall gain on sale spread; and |
|
|
|
|
Net impairment on investment securities available-for-sale increased to reflect
the current industry forecasts for future home price expectations. |
See Results of Operations below.
Critical Accounting Policies
Various elements of our accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to
estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. Certain accounting
policies that, due to the judgment, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies, are
critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements. These policies relate to:
(a) fair value measurements; (b) the determination of our allowance for loan losses; and (c) the
determination of our secondary market reserve. We believe the judgment, estimates and assumptions
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are appropriate given the factual
circumstances at the time. However, given the sensitivity of our consolidated financial statements
to these critical accounting policies, the use of other judgments, estimates and assumptions could
result in material differences in our results of operations and/or financial condition. For
further information on our critical accounting policies, please refer to our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is available on
our website, www.flagstar.com,
under the Investor Relations section, or on the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), at www.sec.gov.
53
Selected Financial Ratios (Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Return on average assets |
|
|
(2.32 |
)% |
|
|
(2.72 |
)% |
|
|
(1.64 |
)% |
|
|
(2.55 |
)% |
Return on average equity |
|
|
(24.87 |
)% |
|
|
(34.72 |
)% |
|
|
(17.40 |
)% |
|
|
(37.31 |
)% |
Efficiency ratio |
|
|
119.7 |
% |
|
|
104.2 |
% |
|
|
107.7 |
% |
|
|
107.5 |
% |
Equity/assets ratio (average for the period) |
|
|
9.33 |
% |
|
|
7.84 |
% |
|
|
9.40 |
% |
|
|
6.84 |
% |
Residential first mortgage loans originated |
|
$ |
4,642,706 |
|
|
$ |
5,451,667 |
|
|
$ |
9,499,017 |
|
|
$ |
9,776,788 |
|
Other loans originated |
|
$ |
152,566 |
|
|
$ |
6,935 |
|
|
$ |
183,929 |
|
|
$ |
19,662 |
|
Mortgage loans sold and securitized |
|
$ |
4,362,518 |
|
|
$ |
5,259,830 |
|
|
$ |
10,192,026 |
|
|
$ |
9,796,450 |
|
Interest rate spread bank only (1) |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
Net interest margin bank only (2) |
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
1.57 |
% |
Interest rate spread consolidated (1) |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
Net interest margin consolidated (2) |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
1.47 |
% |
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
553,946,138 |
|
|
|
153,298,115 |
|
|
|
553,751,593 |
|
|
|
115,707,181 |
|
Average fully diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
553,946,138 |
|
|
|
153,298,115 |
|
|
|
553,751,593 |
|
|
|
115,707,181 |
|
Average interest earning assets |
|
$ |
11,297,984 |
|
|
$ |
12,746,811 |
|
|
$ |
11,385,031 |
|
|
$ |
12,514,547 |
|
Average interest paying liabilities |
|
$ |
10,301,159 |
|
|
$ |
11,641,804 |
|
|
$ |
10,380,371 |
|
|
$ |
11,707,054 |
|
Average stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,204,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,117,686 |
|
|
$ |
1,224,829 |
|
|
$ |
959,039 |
|
Charge-offs to average investment loans
(annualized) |
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Equity-to-assets ratio |
|
|
9.27 |
% |
|
|
9.50 |
% |
|
|
9.23 |
% |
|
|
7.86 |
% |
Core capital ratio(3) |
|
|
10.07 |
% |
|
|
9.87 |
% |
|
|
9.61 |
% |
|
|
9.24 |
% |
Total risk-based capital ratio (3) |
|
|
19.73 |
% |
|
|
20.51 |
% |
|
|
18.55 |
% |
|
|
17.20 |
% |
Book value per common share |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
$ |
5.41 |
|
Number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
554,163,337 |
|
|
|
553,711,848 |
|
|
|
553,313,113 |
|
|
|
153,338,007 |
|
Mortgage loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
57,087,989 |
|
|
$ |
59,577,239 |
|
|
$ |
56,040,063 |
|
|
$ |
50,385,208 |
|
Weighted average service fee (basis points) |
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
Capitalized value of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
Ratio of allowance to non-performing loans |
|
|
67.9 |
% |
|
|
73.6 |
% |
|
|
86.1 |
% |
|
|
52.3 |
% |
Ratio of allowance to loans held-for-investment |
|
|
4.59 |
% |
|
|
4.70 |
% |
|
|
4.35 |
% |
|
|
7.20 |
% |
Ratio of non-performing assets to total assets
(bank only) |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|
4.35 |
% |
|
|
9.06 |
% |
Number of bank branches |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Number of loan origination centers |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Number of employees (excluding loan officers
and account executives) |
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
Number of loan officers and account executives |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
N/M Not meaningful
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the annualized average yield earned on
average interest-earning assets for the period and the annualized average rate of interest paid on average interest-bearing liabilities for the period. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest margin is the annualized effect of the net interest income divided by that periods average interest-earning assets. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on adjusted total assets for purposes of tangible
capital and core capital, and risk-weighted assets for purposes of risk-based capital and total risk based capital. These ratios are applicable to the Bank only. |
54
Results of Operations
Three months. Net loss applicable to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30,
2011 was $74.9 million, $(0.14) per share-diluted, a $22.1 million decrease from the loss of $97.0
million, $(0.63) per share-diluted, reported in the comparable 2010 period. The overall decrease
resulted from a $37.6 million decrease in the provision for loan losses, a $25.3 million decrease
in non-interest expense and a $1.8 million increase in net interest income, offset by a $42.2
million decrease in non-interest income.
Six months. Net loss applicable to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2011
was $106.6 million, $(0.19) per share-diluted, a $72.3 million decrease from the loss of $178.9
million, $(1.55) per share-diluted, reported in the comparable 2010 period. The overall decrease
resulted from a $72.9 million decrease in the provision for loan losses, a $7.3 million decrease in
non-interest expense and a $18.0 million decrease in non-interest income, offset by an $10.6
million increase in net interest income and a $0.5 million increase in the provision for income
taxes.
Net Interest Income
On June 30, 2011, we implemented a reclassification in the treatment of amounts due from
Federal Housing Administration (FHA) relating to the servicing of delinquent FHA loans to
recognize the accrued credit from FHA as interest income. Previously, income from FHA was applied
as an offset to non-interest expense (asset resolution expense) relating to the servicing of
delinquent FHA loans, and recorded on a net basis as asset resolution expense. The impact of the
reclassification on the three and six month ended June 30, 2011, was an increase in net interest
income of $12.7 million and $25.5 million, respectively, with an offsetting increase to asset
resolution expense and an increase in net interest margin of 20 basis points and 21 basis points,
respectively. The impact of the reclassification on the three and six month ended June 30, 2010,
was an increase in net interest income of $7.1 million and $13.2 million, respectively, with an
offsetting increase to asset resolution expense and an increase in net interest margin of 9 basis
points and 10 basis points, respectively.
We recognized $51.3 million in net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2011,
which represented an increase of 3.6 percent compared to $49.6 million reported for the same period
in 2010. Net interest income represented 40.2 percent of our total revenue in 2011 as compared to
35.1 percent in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized $103.9 million in net
interest income, which represented an increase of 11.3 percent compared to $93.3 million reported
for the same period in 2010.
Net interest income is primarily the dollar value of the average yield we earn on the average
balances of our interest-earning assets, less the dollar value of the average cost of funds we
incur on the average balances of our interest-bearing liabilities.
Three months. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we had average interest-earning assets
of $11.3 billion, as compared to $12.7 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The
decline in average interest-earning assets reflects a $1.6 billion decline in average loans
held-for-investment, as we continued to primarily originate residential first mortgage loans
held-for-sale rather than for investment and a $1.0 billion decrease in average available-for-sale
or trading securities. These decreases were offset by an increase of $0.7 billion in average
interest-earning deposits, on which the Bank earns a minimal interest rate (25 basis points), to
$1.5 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the three months ended June 30,
2010. The increased interest-earning deposits will allow the Bank to fund its on-going initiatives
to increase commercial and specialty lending, as well as other mortgage related initiatives.
Average-interest bearing liabilities totaled $10.3 billion for the three months ended June 30,
2011, as compared to $11.6 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decline of $1.3
billion reflects a $0.6 billion decrease in average deposits and a $0.5 billion decrease in average
FHLB advances for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended June
30, 2010.
Interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $108.1 million, a decrease of
21.2 percent from the $137.2 million recorded in the same
period in 2010. Our residential first
mortgage loans continued to run-off at a faster rate, while this was partially offset by new
originations in the commercial and specialty loan portfolios. Interest expense for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 was $56.7 million, a 35.7 percent decrease as compared to $87.6 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2010. We continue to replace maturing retail certificates of
deposit with core money market and savings accounts. The average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities decreased 82 basis points from 3.03 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to
2.21 percent in the same period in 2011, while the average yield on interest-earning assets
decreased 49 basis points (11.4 percent), from 4.31 percent for the three months ended June 30,
2010 to 3.82 percent in the same period in 2011. As a result, our interest rate spread was 1.61
percent for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 1.28 percent for the three months
ended June 30, 2010.
Our consolidated net interest margin was positively impacted by the expansion of our interest
rate spread during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and a $0.6 billion decrease in
non-performing loans from $1.0 billion at June 30, 2010, to $0.4 billion at June 30, 2011. The
result was a net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2011 of 1.81 percent as
55
compared to 1.54 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The Bank recorded a net
interest margin of 1.86 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 1.61 percent for the three months
ended June 30, 2010.
Six months. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had average interest-earning assets of
$11.4 billion, as compared to $12.5 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decline in
average interest-earning assets reflects a $1.7 billion decline in average loans
held-for-investment, as we continued to primarily originate residential first mortgage loans
held-for-sale rather than investment and a $0.7 billion decrease in average available-for-sale or
trading securities. These decreases were offset by an increase of $0.6 billion in average
interest-earning deposits, on which the Bank earns a minimal interest rate (25 basis points), to
$1.6 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the six months ended June 30,
2010. The increased interest-earning deposits will allow the Bank to fund its on-going initiatives
to increase commercial and specialty lending, as well as other mortgage related initiatives.
Average-interest bearing liabilities totaled $10.4 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2011,
as compared to $11.7 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decline of $1.3 billion
reflects a $0.7 billion decrease in average deposits and a $0.5 billion decrease in average FHLB
advances for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $219.2 million, a decrease of 18.6
percent from the $269.5 million recorded in the same period in
2010. Our residential first
mortgage loans continued to run-off at a faster rate, while this was partially offset by new
originations in the commercial and specialty loan portfolios. Interest expense for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 was $115.3 million, a 34.5 percent decrease as compared to $176.1 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010. We continue to replace maturing retail certificates of deposit
with core money market and savings accounts. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities
decreased 79 basis points from 3.03 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to 2.24 percent
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, while the average yield on interest-earning assets
decreased 47 basis points (10.9 percent), from 4.32 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010
to 3.85 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2011. As a result, our interest rate spread was
1.61 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 1.27 percent for the six months
ended June 30, 2010.
Our consolidated net interest margin was positively impacted by the expansion of our interest
rate spread during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and a $0.6 billion decrease in non-performing
loans from $1.0 billion at June 30, 2010, to $0.4 billion at June 30, 2011. The result was a net
interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2011 of 1.81 percent, as compared to 1.47 percent
the six months ended June 30, 2010. The Bank recorded a net interest margin of 1.87 percent for
the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 1.57 percent for the six months ended June 30,
2010.
The
following tables presents on a consolidated basis (rather than on a
Bank-only basis) interest income from average earning assets, expressed in
dollars and yields, and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed in
dollars and rates. Interest income recorded on our loans is adjusted by the amortization of net
premiums, net deferred loan origination costs and the amount of negative amortization (i.e.,
capitalized interest) arising from our option power ARM loans. These adjustments to interest
income during both the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was a net increase of $0.5
million, and for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was a net reduction of $(0.4)
million and $(0.2) million, respectively. Non-accruing loans were included in the average loans
outstanding.
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,509,692 |
|
|
$ |
17,814 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
$ |
1,675,502 |
|
|
$ |
20,927 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Loans repurchased with government
guarantees |
|
|
1,752,817 |
|
|
|
13,260 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
1,173,398 |
|
|
|
7,148 |
|
|
|
2.44 |
% |
Loans held-for-investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans (3) |
|
|
4,551,266 |
|
|
|
52,245 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
% |
|
|
5,885,261 |
|
|
|
70,887 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
% |
Commercial loans (3) |
|
|
1,211,284 |
|
|
|
14,836 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
% |
|
|
1,535,025 |
|
|
|
16,991 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment |
|
|
5,762,551 |
|
|
|
67,081 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
7,420,286 |
|
|
|
87,878 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
% |
Securities classified as available-for-sale or
trading |
|
|
724,694 |
|
|
|
8,949 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
% |
|
|
1,653,662 |
|
|
|
20,735 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
% |
Interest-earning deposits and other |
|
|
1,548,231 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
823,963 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
11,297,984 |
|
|
|
108,061 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
12,746,811 |
|
|
|
137,170 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
% |
Other assets |
|
|
1,612,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,517,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,910,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,264,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
409,663 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
$ |
388,402 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
1,182,145 |
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
691,170 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
% |
Money market deposits |
|
|
579,361 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
562,442 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
3,002,363 |
|
|
|
13,576 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
3,313,711 |
|
|
|
24,273 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail deposits |
|
|
5,173,532 |
|
|
|
17,318 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
4,955,725 |
|
|
|
27,719 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
Demand deposits |
|
|
66,549 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
392,054 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
433,642 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
68,722 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
237,600 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
245,702 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total government deposits |
|
|
737,791 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
706,478 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
% |
Wholesale deposits |
|
|
741,024 |
|
|
|
6,393 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
% |
|
|
1,628,940 |
|
|
|
12,738 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
6,652,347 |
|
|
|
24,902 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
7,291,143 |
|
|
|
41,521 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
3,400,202 |
|
|
|
30,218 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
% |
|
|
3,891,758 |
|
|
|
42,151 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
% |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
210,268 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
Other |
|
|
248,610 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
248,635 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
10,301,159 |
|
|
|
56,737 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
11,641,804 |
|
|
|
87,617 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,404,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,505,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,204,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,117,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
12,910,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,264,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
996,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,105,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between rates of interest earned on interest-earning assets and rates of interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
|
|
(2) |
|
Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
|
|
(3) |
|
Consumer loans include: residential first mortgage, second mortgage, construction, warehouse lending, HELOC and other consumer loans. Commercial
loans include: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and commercial lease financing loans.
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,596,272 |
|
|
$ |
36,508 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
$ |
1,598,996 |
|
|
$ |
39,855 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
Loans repurchased with government
guarantees |
|
|
1,749,124 |
|
|
|
26,036 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
1,045,140 |
|
|
|
13,234 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
% |
Loans held-for-investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans (3) |
|
|
4,583,299 |
|
|
|
107,985 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
|
5,885,068 |
|
|
|
143,190 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
% |
Commercial loans (3) |
|
|
1,219,834 |
|
|
|
29,740 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
% |
|
|
1,569,025 |
|
|
|
35,955 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment |
|
|
5,803,133 |
|
|
|
137,725 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
7,454,093 |
|
|
|
179,145 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
% |
Securities classified as available-for-sale or
trading |
|
|
677,332 |
|
|
|
17,046 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
1,397,018 |
|
|
|
36,102 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
% |
Interest-earning deposits and other |
|
|
1,559,170 |
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
1,019,300 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
11,385,031 |
|
|
$ |
219,240 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
12,514,547 |
|
|
|
269,462 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
% |
Other assets |
|
|
1,638,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,023,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,014,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
404,043 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
$ |
379,260 |
|
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
1,128,994 |
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
690,080 |
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
Money market deposits |
|
|
567,737 |
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
572,091 |
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
3,093,482 |
|
|
|
28,712 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
3,352,020 |
|
|
|
49,052 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail deposits |
|
|
5,194,256 |
|
|
|
36,307 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
4,993,451 |
|
|
|
55,700 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
% |
Demand deposits |
|
|
72,117 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
342,254 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
395,593 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
72,954 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
244,584 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
% |
|
|
259,616 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total government deposits |
|
|
712,294 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
674,824 |
|
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
Wholesale deposits |
|
|
790,772 |
|
|
|
13,322 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
|
1,709,241 |
|
|
|
25,765 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
6,697,322 |
|
|
|
51,924 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
7,377,516 |
|
|
|
83,407 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
3,434,438 |
|
|
|
60,196 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
% |
|
|
3,895,856 |
|
|
|
83,938 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
% |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
159,416 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
% |
Other |
|
|
248,610 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
274,266 |
|
|
|
6,044 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
10,380,370 |
|
|
|
115,343 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
11,707,054 |
|
|
|
176,139 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,418,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,348,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,224,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
959,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
13,023,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,014,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
1,004,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
807,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
103,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between rates of interest earned on interest-earning assets and rates of interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
|
|
(6) |
|
Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
|
|
(4) |
|
Consumer loans include: residential first mortgage, second mortgage, construction, warehouse lending, HELOC and other consumer loans. Commercial
loans include: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and commercial lease financing loans.
|
58
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following tables presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest
expense for the components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that are
presented in the preceding table. The table below distinguishes between the changes related to
average outstanding balances (changes in volume while holding the initial rate constant) and the
changes related to average interest rates (changes in average rates while holding the initial
balance constant). Changes attributable to both a change in volume and a change in rates were
included as changes in rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 Versus 2010 Increase |
|
|
|
(Decrease) Due to: |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available-for-sale |
|
$ |
(1,042 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,071 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,113 |
) |
Loans repurchased with government guarantees |
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
|
6,112 |
|
Loans held-for-investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans(1) |
|
|
(2,608 |
) |
|
|
(16,034 |
) |
|
|
(18,642 |
) |
Commercial loans(1) |
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
(3,567 |
) |
|
|
(2,155 |
) |
|
|
|
Total loans held-for-investment |
|
|
(1,196 |
) |
|
|
(19,601 |
) |
|
|
(20,797 |
) |
Securities available-for-sale or trading |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(11,629 |
) |
|
|
(11,786 |
) |
Interest-earning deposits and other |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
Total other interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
(29,346 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,109 |
) |
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
(210 |
) |
Savings deposits |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(8,500 |
) |
|
|
(2,197 |
) |
|
|
(10,697 |
) |
|
|
|
Total retail deposits |
|
|
(9,393 |
) |
|
|
(1,008 |
) |
|
|
(10,401 |
) |
Demand deposits |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(378 |
) |
Savings deposits |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
Total government deposits |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Wholesale deposits |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
(6,929 |
) |
|
|
(6,345 |
) |
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
(8,817 |
) |
|
|
(7,802 |
) |
|
|
(16,619 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
(6,729 |
) |
|
|
(5,204 |
) |
|
|
(11,933 |
) |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,597 |
) |
|
|
(1,597 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
(16,285 |
) |
|
|
(14,595 |
) |
|
|
(30,880 |
) |
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
16,522 |
|
|
$ |
(14,751 |
) |
|
$ |
1,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consumer loans include: residential first mortgage, second mortgage, construction, warehouse lending, HELOC and other consumer
loans. Commercial loans include: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and commercial lease financing loans.
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 Versus 2010 Increase |
|
|
|
(Decrease) Due to: |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available-for-sale |
|
$ |
(3,278 |
) |
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,347 |
) |
Loans repurchased with government guarantees |
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
8,915 |
|
|
|
12,802 |
|
Loans held-for-investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans(1) |
|
|
(3,531 |
) |
|
|
(32,674 |
) |
|
|
(35,205 |
) |
Commercial loans(1) |
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
(7,992 |
) |
|
|
(6,215 |
) |
|
|
|
Total loans held-for-investment |
|
|
(1,754 |
) |
|
|
(39,666 |
) |
|
|
(41,420 |
) |
Securities available-for-sale or trading |
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
(18,552 |
) |
|
|
(19,056 |
) |
Interest-earning deposits and other |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
|
Total other interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
(1,446 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,776 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,222 |
) |
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
(410 |
) |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
(337 |
) |
Savings deposits |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(480 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(16,693 |
) |
|
|
(3,646 |
) |
|
|
(20,339 |
) |
|
|
|
Total retail deposits |
|
|
(17,697 |
) |
|
|
(1,696 |
) |
|
|
(19,393 |
) |
Demand deposits |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
(547 |
) |
Savings deposits |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
|
Total government deposits |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Wholesale deposits |
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
(13,857 |
) |
|
|
(12,443 |
) |
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
(16,137 |
) |
|
|
(15,346 |
) |
|
|
(31,483 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
(13,915 |
) |
|
|
(9,827 |
) |
|
|
(23,742 |
) |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,750 |
) |
|
|
(2,750 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
(2,82 |
) |
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
(32,326 |
) |
|
|
(28,470 |
) |
|
|
(60,796 |
) |
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
30,880 |
|
|
$ |
(20,306 |
) |
|
$ |
10,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consumer loans include: residential first mortgage, second mortgage, construction, warehouse lending, HELOC and other consumer
loans. Commercial loans include: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and commercial lease financing loans. |
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision reflects the current period charge necessary to maintain the allowance for loan
losses at a level to cover our estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio for each of
the respective measurement dates.
Three months. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a provision for loan
losses of $48.4 million as compared to $86.0 million recorded during the same period in 2010. Net
charge-offs for three month period ended June 30, 2011 totaled $45.4 million as compared to $94.0
million in for the same period in 2010. The decline was primarily attributable to provisions
relating to residential first mortgage loans as a result of the sale in the fourth quarter 2010 of
non-performing mortgage loans. The level of provisions during the second quarter 2011 was due in
part to the increase during the quarter of over-90-day past due loans, which carry an incremental
loss rate of 18 percent above that of the over-60-day loans in our calculation of the allowance for
loan losses. Such increase in over-90-day loans arose principally from loans originated during
2007. Loans originated during 2007 comprised approximately 35 percent of the total residential
first mortgage loans in our investment portfolio at June 30, 2011. Over-90-day residential
mortgage loans originated during 2007 were approximately 41 percent of the total amount of the
over-90-day residential mortgage loans outstanding at June 30, 2011. The 2007 vintage over-90-day
past due loans were primarily intermediate ARM and fixed rate mortgages and approximately
two-thirds had updated LTV ratios (based on HPI updates using OFHEO data as of March 31,
2011) in excess of 100 percent. The provision expense for second quarter 2011 also reflected a
more conservative view by management of the expected loss rate applied to residential mortgage
loans and of the internal credit rankings applied to commercial real estate loans originated
through 2008. As a percentage of the average loans held-for-investment, net charge-offs for the
three month period ended June 30, 2011 decreased to 0.79 percent from 1.27 percent for the same
period in 2010.
60
Six months. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a provision for loan losses
of $76.7 million as
compared to $149.6 million recorded during the same period in 2010. The decrease in the
provision during the six months ended June 30, 2011, which maintained the allowance for loan losses
at $274.0 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, parallels a decrease in net charge-offs
both as a dollar amount and as a percentage of the loans held-for-investment over the comparable
period in 2010. Net charge-offs for six month period ended June 30, 2011 totaled $76.7 million as
compared to $143.6 million in for the same period in 2010. The decline was primarily due to a
lower level of charge-offs of residential first mortgage loans resulting from non-performing loan
sales completed in the fourth quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011. As a percentage of
the average loans held-for-investment, net charge-offs for the six month period ended June 30, 2011
decreased to 1.32 percent from 1.93 percent for the same period in 2010. However, the current
period provision does include the effect of loan delinquencies increasing to 9.07 percent of total
loans held-for-investment at June 30, 2011 from 8.02 percent at December 31, 2010.
Loan delinquencies include all loans that were delinquent for at least 30 days under the OTS
Method. The OTS Method, considers a loan to be delinquent if no payment is received after the
first day of the month following the month of the missed payment. Total delinquent loans increased
to $542.2 million at June 30, 2011, of which $403.4 million were over 90 days delinquent, as
compared to $505.6 million at December 31, 2010, of which $318.4 million were over 90 days
delinquent. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the increase in delinquencies primarily
impacted residential first mortgage loans as other categories of loans within the
held-for-investment portfolio showed improvement including commercial real estate, commercial and
industrial, second mortgage and HELOC loans. The overall delinquency rate on residential first
mortgage loans increased to 11.04 percent at June 30, 2011 from 6.81 percent at December 31, 2010.
This increase reflects the expected migration of current loans into delinquency status following
the sale of non-performing loans completed in the fourth quarter of 2010, which temporarily reduced
the overall delinquency rate. The overall delinquency rate on commercial real estate loans
decreased to 9.41 percent at June 30, 2011 from 16.85 percent at December 31, 2010, due in large
part to the charge-down or movement of impaired commercial real estate to REO coupled with a sale
of several impaired commercial real estate loans.
See the section captioned Allowance for Loan Losses in this discussion for further analysis
of the provision for loan losses.
Non-Interest Income
The following table sets forth the components of our non-interest income:
NON-INTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loan fees and charges |
|
$ |
14,712 |
|
|
$ |
20,236 |
|
|
$ |
30,850 |
|
|
$ |
36,565 |
|
Deposit fees and charges |
|
|
7,845 |
|
|
|
8,798 |
|
|
|
15,345 |
|
|
|
17,211 |
|
Loan administration |
|
|
30,450 |
|
|
|
(54,665 |
) |
|
|
69,786 |
|
|
|
(28,515 |
) |
Net gain on trading securities |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
69,660 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
66,348 |
|
Loss on residual and transferors interest |
|
|
(2,258 |
) |
|
|
(4,312 |
) |
|
|
(4,640 |
) |
|
|
(6,994 |
) |
Net gain on loan sales |
|
|
39,827 |
|
|
|
64,257 |
|
|
|
90,012 |
|
|
|
116,823 |
|
Net loss on sales of mortgage servicing
rights |
|
|
(2,381 |
) |
|
|
(1,266 |
) |
|
|
(2,493 |
) |
|
|
(3,479 |
) |
Net gain on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,689 |
|
Net loss on sale of assets |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment
gain (loss) |
|
|
39,725 |
|
|
|
11,274 |
|
|
|
39,725 |
|
|
|
36,796 |
|
Gain recognized in other comprehensive
income before taxes |
|
|
(55,309 |
) |
|
|
(11,665 |
) |
|
|
(55,309 |
) |
|
|
(40,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in
earnings |
|
|
(15,584 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(15,584 |
) |
|
|
(3,677 |
) |
Other fees and charges |
|
|
(15,928 |
) |
|
|
(6,509 |
) |
|
|
(29,216 |
) |
|
|
(28,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
58,078 |
|
|
$ |
100,331 |
|
|
$ |
154,344 |
|
|
$ |
172,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income was $58.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011, which
was a 42.1 percent decrease from $100.3 million of non-interest income in the comparable 2010
period. The decrease during the three months ended June 30, 2011, was primarily due to a decrease
in gain on trading securities, a decrease in net gain on loan sales, and a increase in net
impairment losses recognized in earnings, offset by an increase in loan administration income.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, total non-interest income decreased to $154.3 million,
from $172.3 million of non-interest income
61
in the comparable 2010 period. The decrease during the
six months ended June 30, 2011, was primarily due to the same reasons stated above. Factors
affecting the comparability of the primary components of non-interest income are discussed in the
following paragraphs.
Loan fees and charges
Our home lending operation and banking operation both earn loan origination fees and collect
other charges in connection with originating residential first mortgages and other types of loans.
For the three month period ended June 30, 2011, we recorded loan fees and charges of $14.7 million,
a decrease of $5.5 million from the $20.2 million recorded for the comparable 2010 period. Loan
fees and charges during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 were $30.9 million, compared to
$36.6 million recorded for the same 2010 period. Loan origination fees are capitalized and added
as an adjustment to the basis of the individual loans originated. These fees are accreted into
income as an adjustment to the loan yield over the life of the loan or when the loan is sold. We
account for substantially all mortgage originations as available-for-sale using the fair value
method and no longer apply deferral of non-refundable fees and costs to those loans.
Deposit fees and charges
Our banking operation collects deposit fees and other charges such as fees for non-sufficient
funds checks, cashier check fees, ATM fees, overdraft protection, and other account fees for
services we provide to our banking customers. The amount of these fees tends to increase as a
function of the growth in our deposit base. Our total number of customer checking accounts
increased 10 percent from approximately 120,000 on June 30, 2010 to 132,000 as of June 30, 2011.
Three months. Total deposit fees and charges decreased 11 percent during the three month
period ended June 30, 2011 to $7.8 million, compared to $8.8 million during the comparable 2010
period. Our non-sufficient funds fees decreased to $5.1 million during the three month period
ended June 30, 2011 from $6.1 million during the comparable 2010 period. The primary reason for
these decreases in deposit fees and charges was the result of changes to Regulation E, implemented
in the third quarter 2010, requiring financial institutions to provide customers with the right to
opt-in to overdraft services for ATM and one-time, non-recurring debit card transactions. Debit
card fee income increased by 18 percent to $1.9 million during the three month period ended June
30, 2011 from $1.6 million in the comparable 2010 period. This is attributable to the 15 percent
increase in transaction volume from $85.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $98.0
million during the three month period ended June 30, 2011. The Federal Reserve issued its final
rule in connection with interchange fees, although it is more favorable than the original proposal,
it may still represent a negative impact on future debit card fee income.
Six months. Total deposit fees and charges decreased to $15.3 million, or 11 percent, during
the six month period ended June 30, 2011 from $17.2 million during the comparable 2010 period. Our
non-sufficient funds fees were $9.7 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 as
compared to $11.7 million during the comparable 2010 period. The primary reason for these
decreases in deposit fees and charges was the result of changes to Regulation E, implemented in the
third quarter 2010, requiring financial institutions to provide customers with the right to
opt-in to overdraft services for ATM and one-time, non-recurring debit card transactions. Debit
card fee income increased to $3.7 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 from $3.0
million in the comparable 2010 period. This is attributable to the 15 percent increase in
transaction volume from $165.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $190.0 million
during the six month period ended June 30, 2011. The Federal Reserve issued its final rule in
connection with interchange fees, although it is more favorable than the original proposal, it may
still represent a negative impact on future debit card fee income.
62
Loan administration
When our home lending operation sells mortgage loans in the secondary market, it usually
retains the right to continue to service these loans and earn a servicing fee, also referred to
herein as loan administration income. Our MSRs are accounted for on the fair value method. See
Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
The following table summarizes net loan administration income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing income (loss) on other consumer
mortgage servicing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees, ancillary income and
charges |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
2,392 |
|
Amortization expense other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(884 |
) |
Impairment (loss) other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loan administration income other
consumer |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
965 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
Servicing income (loss) on residential first
mortgage servicing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees, ancillary income and
charges |
|
$ |
42,727 |
|
|
$ |
36,420 |
|
|
$ |
86,314 |
|
|
$ |
73,762 |
|
Fair value adjustments |
|
|
(48,917 |
) |
|
|
(112,201 |
) |
|
|
(44,794 |
) |
|
|
(153,672 |
) |
Gain on hedging activity |
|
|
36,605 |
|
|
|
20,151 |
|
|
|
28,198 |
|
|
|
49,823 |
|
|
|
|
Total net loan administration income
(loss) residential (1) |
|
|
30,415 |
|
|
|
(55,630 |
) |
|
|
69,718 |
|
|
|
(30,087 |
) |
|
|
|
Total loan administration income (loss) |
|
$ |
30,450 |
|
|
$ |
(54,665 |
) |
|
$ |
69,786 |
|
|
$ |
(28,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loan administration income does not reflect the impact of mortgage-backed
securities deployed as economic hedges of MSR assets. These positions, recorded
as securities trading, provided $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million in
gains in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to
$69.7 million and $66.3 million in gains, respectively, for the comparable 2010
periods. These positions, which are on the balance sheet, also contributed $0.9
million and $1.1 million in interest income for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to $9.2 million and $3.5 million,
respectively, during the corresponding period of 2010. |
Three months. Loan administration income increased to $30.4 million for the three month
period ended June 30, 2011 from a loss of $54.7 million for the comparable 2010 period. Servicing
fees, ancillary income, and charges on our residential first mortgage servicing increased during
the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, primarily attributable to
an increase in the average balance in the portfolio of loans serviced for others, slower than
expected levels of prepayments, and effective hedge performance. Hedge performance was driven in
part by the steepness of the yield curve and the resulting high level of carry on hedges as well as
reduced market volatility. The total unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others was
$57.1 billion at June 30, 2011, compared to $50.4 billion at June 30, 2010.
The loan administration income of $30.4 million does not include $0.1 million of gains in
mortgage-backed securities that were held as economic hedges of our MSR asset during the three
months ended June 30, 2011. These gains are required to be recorded separately as gains on trading
securities as a component of current period results of operations.
For consumer mortgage servicing, the decrease in the servicing fees, ancillary income and
charges for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to 2010 was due to the transfer of
servicing to a third party servicer in the fourth quarter 2010. At June 30, 2011, the total unpaid
principal balance of consumer loans serviced for others was zero (due to the transfer of such
servicing pursuant to the applicable servicing agreements) compared to $0.8 billion serviced at
June 30, 2010.
Six months. Loan administration income was $69.8 million for the six month period ended June
30, 2011 from a loss of $28.5 million for the comparable 2010 period. The increase was primarily
due to servicing fees, ancillary income, and charges on our residential first mortgage servicing
from an increase in the average balance in the portfolio of loans serviced for others, slower than
expected levels of prepayments, and effective hedge performance during the six months ended June
30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. During the six month
periods ending June 30, 2011 and 2010, $4.7 billion and
$10.8 billion, respectively, of servicing rights related to loans serviced for others were sold on a bulk basis.
Loan administration income of $69.8 million does not include less than $0.1 million of gains
in mortgage-backed securities that were held as economic hedges of our MSR asset during the six
months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in consumer mortgage servicing fees, ancillary income and
charges for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to 2010, was primarily due to the
transfer of servicing to a third party servicer in the fourth quarter 2010
63
Gain on trading securities
Securities classified as trading are comprised of U.S. Treasury bonds and agency
mortgage-backed securities. U.S. Treasury bonds held in trading are distinguished from
available-for-sale based upon the intent of management to use them as an economic hedge against
changes in the valuation of the MSR portfolio, however, these do not qualify as an accounting hedge
as defined in current accounting guidance for derivatives and hedges.
Three months. For U.S. Treasury bonds held, we recorded a gain of $0.1 million for the three
month period ended June 30, 2011, all of which was related to an unrealized gain on U.S. Treasury
bonds held at June 30, 2011. For the same period in 2010, we recorded a gain of $69.7 million of
which $24.8 million was related to an unrealized gain on agency mortgage-backed securities and U.S.
Treasury bonds held at June 30, 2010.
Six months. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a gain of less than $0.1
million on U.S. Treasury bonds held, all of which was related to an unrealized gain on U.S.
Treasury bonds held at June 30, 2011. For the same period in 2010, we recorded a gain of $66.3
million of which $21.0 million was related to an unrealized gain on agency mortgage-backed
securities and U.S. Treasury bonds held at June 30, 2010.
Loss on residual interests and transferor interests
Losses on residual interests classified as trading and transferors interest are a result of a
reduction in the estimated fair value of our beneficial interests resulting from private
securitizations. The losses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are
primarily due to continued increases in expected credit losses on the assets underlying the
securitizations. For further information on the securitizations see Note 9 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
Three months. We recognized a loss of $2.3 million for the three month period ended June 30,
2011, all of which was related to a reduction in the transferors interest related to our HELOC
securitizations. We recognized a loss of $4.3 million for the three month period ended June 30,
2010, of which $0.3 million was related to the reduction in the residual valuation and $4.0 million
was related to the reduction in the transferors interest. At June 30, 2011, our expected
liability was $3.0 million, compared to $7.5 million at June 30, 2010.
Six months. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, we recognized a loss of $4.6
million, all of which was related to a reduction in the transferors interest related to our HELOC
securitizations. For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, we recognized a loss of $7.0
million, of which $2.1 million was related to the reduction in the residual valuation and $4.9
million was related to the reduction in the transferors interest.
Net gain on loan sales
Our home lending operation records the transaction fee income it generates from the
origination, securitization and sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market. The amount of net
gain on loan sales recognized is a function of the volume of mortgage loans originated for sale and
the fair value of these loans, net of related selling expenses. Net gain on loan sales is
increased or decreased by any mark to market pricing adjustments on loan commitments and forward
sales commitments, increases to the secondary market reserve related to loans sold during the
period, and related administrative expenses. The volatility in the gain on sale spread is
attributable to market pricing, which changes with demand and the general level of interest rates.
Historically, pricing competition on mortgage loans is lower in periods of low or decreasing
interest rates, due to higher consumer demand as usually evidenced by
higher loan origination levels, resulting in higher spreads on origination. Conversely, pricing competition
increases when interest rates rise, which generally reduce consumer
demand, thus decreasing spreads on origination and compressing gain on
sale.
The following table provides information on our net gain on loan sales reported in our
consolidated financial statements and loans sold within the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net gain on loan sales |
|
$ |
39,827 |
|
|
$ |
64,257 |
|
|
$ |
90,012 |
|
|
$ |
116,823 |
|
Loans sold or securitized |
|
$ |
4,362,518 |
|
|
$ |
5,259,830 |
|
|
$ |
10,192,026 |
|
|
$ |
10,274,686 |
|
Spread achieved |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
64
Three months. For the three month period ended June 30, 2011, net gain on loan sales
decreased $24.5 million to $39.8 million from $64.3 million in the comparable 2010 period. The
three- month period ended June 30, 2011, included the sale of $4.4 billion in loans compared to
$5.3 billion sold in the comparable 2010 period. Management believes changes in market
conditions during the 2010 and into the 2011 period resulted in decreased mortgage loan
origination volume ($4.6 billion in the three month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to $5.5
billion in the comparable 2010 period) and an overall decrease on sale spread (91 basis points in
the three month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to 122 basis points in the comparable 2010
period). The decrease was primarily due to an increase in trades paired off fees which totaled
$3.8 billion during the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $2.6 billion during the three
months ended June 30, 2010.
Six months. Net gain on loan sales decreased to $90.0 million for the six- month period ended
June 30, 2011, from $116.8 million in the comparable 2010 period. The decrease included the sale
of $10.2 billion in loans, compared to $10.3 billion sold in the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Management believes changes in market conditions during the 2010 and into the 2011 period resulted
in decreased mortgage loan origination volume ($9.5 billion in the six months ended June 30, 2011,
compared to $9.8 billion in the comparable 2010 period) and an overall decrease on sale spread (88
basis points in the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 114 basis points in the comparable
2010 period). The decrease was primarily due to an increase in trades paired off fee and the loss
spread during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was 22 basis points higher, compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2010.
Our calculation of net gain on loan sales reflects adoption of fair value accounting for the
majority of mortgage loans available-for-sale beginning January 1, 2009. The change of method was
made on a prospective basis; therefore, only mortgage loans available-for-sale that were originated
after 2009 have been affected. In addition, we also had changes in amounts related to derivatives,
lower of cost or market adjustments on loans transferred to held-for-investment and provisions to
secondary market reserve. Changes in amounts related to loan commitments and forward sales
commitments amounted to $6.5 million and $47.5 million for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $25.4 million and $42.4 million for the comparable 2010
periods, respectively. Lower of cost or market adjustments amounted to less than $0.1 million for
both the three- and six- month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to less than
$0.1 million and $0.1 million for the comparable 2010 periods, respectively. Provisions to our
secondary market reserve representing our initial estimate of losses on probable mortgage
repurchases amounted to $1.4 million and $3.7 million, for the three- and six- month periods ended
June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $6.8 million and $13.9 million for the comparable 2010
periods, respectively. Also included in net gain on loan sales is the initial capitalized value of
our MSRs, which totaled $38.3 million and $89.0 million for the three- and six- month periods ended
June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $45.1 million and $93.4 million for the comparable 2010
periods, respectively.
Net loss on sales of mortgage servicing rights
As part of our business model, our home lending operation occasionally sells MSRs in
transactions separate from the sale of the underlying loans. Because we carry our MSRs at
fair value, we would not expect to realize significant gains or losses at the time of the sale.
Instead, our income or loss on changes in the valuation of MSRs would be recorded through our loan
administration income.
Three months. For the three month period ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a loss on sales of
MSRs of $2.4 million compared to a $1.3 million loss recorded for the same period in 2010. During
the three month period ended June 30, 2011, we sold servicing rights on a bulk basis associated
with underlying mortgage loans totaling $4.7 billion and on a
servicing released basis (i.e., sold together with the sale of the underlying loans) as to
underlying mortgage loans totaling $0.3 billion. During the same period in 2010, we transferred
the related servicing rights on our two private second mortgage loans securitizations, FSTAR 2006-1
and FSTAR 2007-1, and had amortized costs of $5.1 million and a recorded impairment of $3.8
million.
Six months. We recorded a loss on sales of MSRs of $2.5 million for the six month period ended
June 30, 2011, compared to a $3.5 million loss recorded for the same period in 2010. During the
six month period ended June 30, 2011, we sold servicing rights on a bulk basis associated with
underlying mortgage loans totaling $4.7 billion and as to
underlying mortgage loans totaling $0.8 billion. During the same period in 2010, we transferred the related servicing
rights on our two private second mortgage loans securitizations, FSTAR 2006-1 and FSTAR 2007-1, and
had amortized costs of $5.1 million and a recorded impairment of $3.8 million.
Net gain on securities available-for-sale
Securities classified as available-for-sale are comprised of U.S. government sponsored agency
mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs).
Gains on the sale of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities
available-for-sale that are recently created with underlying mortgage products originated by the
Bank, are reported within net gain on loan sales. Securities in U.S. government sponsored agency
mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale typically have remained in the
65
portfolio less than 90
days before sale. Gain on sales for all other available-for-sale securities types are reported in
net gain on sale on sale of available-for-sale securities.
Three months. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, there were no sales of U.S.
government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities with underlying mortgage products originated
by the Bank, compared to $143.4 million resulting in $0.2 million of net gain on loan sale during
the same period in 2010. During the three month period ended June 30, 2011, there were no sales in purchased U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed
securities and non-U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we sold $198.2 million in purchased U.S. government
sponsored agency securities available-for-sale generating a net gain on sale of available-for-sale
securities of $4.5 million.
Six months. There were no sales of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities
with underlying mortgage products originated by the Bank during the six months ended June 30, 2011,
compared to $143.4 million resulting in $0.2 million of net gain on loan sale during the same
period in 2010. During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, there were no sales in purchased
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and non-U.S government sponsored agency
mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we sold
$251.0 million in purchased U.S. government sponsored agency securities available-for-sale
generating a net gain on sale of available-for-sale securities of $6.7 million.
Net impairment loss recognized through earnings
In both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, there were $15.6 million of
credit losses recognized with respect to the CMOs, as the result of
forecasted continued depreciation
in home values which serve as collateral for these securities. At June 30, 2011, the
cumulative amount of OTTI expense incurred due to credit losses on the CMOs totaled $50.3 million.
In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, additional OTTI due to credit losses on
investments with existing OTTI credit losses totaled $0.4 million and $3.7 million, respectively,
while additional amounts of OTTI due to credit loss were recognized on two securities that did not
already have such losses at June 30, 2010. All OTTI due to credit losses were recognized as
expense in current operations. For further information on impairment losses, see Note 4 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
Other fees and charges
Other fees and charges include certain miscellaneous fees, including dividends received on
FHLB stock and income generated by our subsidiaries Flagstar Reinsurance Company (FRC), Douglas
Insurance Agency, Inc. and Paperless Office Solutions, Inc.
Three months. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded $2.1 million in
dividends on an average outstanding balance of FHLB stock of $328.3 million, as compared to $1.8
million in dividends on an average balance of FHLB stock outstanding of $373.4 million for the
comparable period in 2010. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, FRC had no earned fees,
compared to $0.4 million for the same period in 2010. During the third quarter 2010, FRC
terminated its reinsurance agreement with the last of the four mortgage insurance companies and as
a result FRC will no longer earn any fees. In addition, during the three month period ended June
30, 2011, we recorded an expense of $21.4 million for the increase in our secondary market reserve
due to our change in estimate of expected losses from probable repurchase obligations related to
loans sold in prior periods, which increased from the $11.4 million recorded in the comparable 2010
period.
Six months. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded $4.3 million in dividends
on an average outstanding balance of FHLB stock of $331.3 million, as compared to $3.7 million in
dividends on an average balance of FHLB stock outstanding of $373.4 million for the comparable
period in 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, FRC had no earned fees, compared to
$0.9 million for the same period in 2010. During the third quarter 2010, FRC terminated its
reinsurance agreement with the last of the four mortgage insurance companies and as a result FRC
will no longer earn any fees. In addition, we recorded expense of $41.8 million and $38.2 million
relating to adjustments to our estimates in determining our secondary market reserve, for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Non-Interest Expense
The following table sets forth the components of our non-interest expense, along with the
allocation of expenses related to loan originations that are deferred pursuant to accounting
guidance for receivables, non-refundable fees and other costs. Mortgage loan fees and direct
origination costs (principally compensation and benefits) are capitalized as an adjustment to the
basis of the loans originated during the period and amortized to expense over the lives of the
respective loans rather than immediately expensed. Other expenses associated with loan
origination, however, are not required or allowed to be capitalized and are, therefore, expensed
when incurred. We account for substantially all of our mortgage loans available-for-sale using the
fair value method and, therefore, immediately recognize loan origination fees and direct
origination costs in the period incurred rather than defer the cost.
66
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
53,749 |
|
|
$ |
43,260 |
|
|
$ |
109,491 |
|
|
$ |
97,192 |
|
Commissions |
|
|
7,483 |
|
|
|
7,946 |
|
|
|
15,052 |
|
|
|
15,096 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
16,969 |
|
|
|
15,903 |
|
|
|
33,587 |
|
|
|
31,914 |
|
Asset resolution |
|
|
23,282 |
|
|
|
52,587 |
|
|
|
61,391 |
|
|
|
75,246 |
|
Federal insurance premiums |
|
|
10,789 |
|
|
|
10,640 |
|
|
|
19,515 |
|
|
|
20,688 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
Warrant income |
|
|
(1,998 |
) |
|
|
(3,486 |
) |
|
|
(2,825 |
) |
|
|
(2,259 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
20,057 |
|
|
|
28,592 |
|
|
|
40,488 |
|
|
|
46,200 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
130,998 |
|
|
|
156,283 |
|
|
|
278,232 |
|
|
|
285,773 |
|
Less: capitalized direct costs of loan closings |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
Total, net |
|
$ |
130,922 |
|
|
$ |
156,181 |
|
|
$ |
278,153 |
|
|
$ |
285,610 |
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio (1) |
|
|
119.7 |
% |
|
|
104.2 |
% |
|
|
107.7 |
% |
|
|
107.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total operating and administrative expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and
non-interest income. |
Non-interest expenses totaled $130.9 million during the three month period ended June 30,
2011, compared to $156.2 million in the comparable 2010 period. Non-interest expenses totaled
$278.2 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to $285.6 million in the
comparable 2010 period. The 2.6 percent decrease in non-interest expense during the six month
period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the prior year, was primarily due to a decrease in asset
resolution and general administration expenses.
Compensation and benefits
Three months. Compensation and benefit expense totaled $53.7 million for the three month
period ended June 30, 2011 compared to $43.3 million in the comparable 2010 period. The increase
in gross compensation and benefits expense is primarily attributable to an increase in our salaried
employees and a $6.7 million increase in incentive compensation accruals during the three months
ended June 30, 2011, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 which included a $3.6 million
reversal of a prior year incentive compensation accrual.
Six months. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compensation and benefit expense
totaled $109.5 million compared to $97.2 million in the comparable 2010 period. The 12.7 percent
increase in gross compensation and benefits expense is primarily attributable to an increase in our
salaried employees and an $8.6 million increase in incentive compensation accruals during the six
months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 which included a $3.6
million reversal of a prior year incentive compensation accrual. Our full-time equivalent
non-commissioned salaried employees increased overall by 105 from June 30, 2010 to a total of 2,990
at June 30, 2011.
Commissions
Three months. Commission expense, which is variable cost associated with loan originations,
totaled $7.5 million, equal to 16 basis points (0.16 percent) of total loan originations during the
three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $7.9 million, equal to 15 basis points (0.15
percent) of total loan originations in the comparable 2010 period. The decrease in commissions was
primarily due to the 12.2 percent decrease in loan originations for the three months ended June 30,
2011. Loan originations decreased to $4.8 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from
$5.5 billion for the comparable period in 2010.
Six months. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 commission expense totaled $15.1
million, equal to 16 basis points (0.16 percent) of total loan originations, compared to $15.1
million, equal to 15 basis points (0.15 percent) of total loan originations in the comparable 2010
period. The 0.3 percent decrease in commissions is primarily due to the 1.2 percent decrease in
loan originations during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Loan originations decreased to $9.7
billion for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $9.8 billion in the comparable period in 2010.
67
Asset resolution
Asset resolution expenses consist of foreclosure and other disposition and carrying costs,
loss provisions, gains and losses on the sale of REO properties that we have obtained through
foreclosure or other proceedings. On June 30, 2011, we implemented a reclassification in the
financial reporting application of amounts due from FHA relating to the servicing of delinquent FHA
loans to recognize the accrued credit from FHA as interest income. Previously, income from FHA was
applied as an offset to non-interest expense (i.e. asset resolution expense) relating to the
servicing of delinquent FHA loans, and recorded on a net basis as asset resolution expense. The
impact of the reclassification on the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, was an increase in
net interest income of $12.7 million and $25.5 million, respectively, and a corresponding increase to
asset resolution expense. The impact of the reclassification on the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, was an increase in net interest income of $7.1 million and $13.2 million,
respectively, and a corresponding increase to asset resolution expense. The discussion immediately below
relates to the changes in asset resolution expense on a post-reclassification basis.
Three months. Asset resolution expense decreased $29.3 million to $23.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $52.6 million in the comparable period in 2010. The decrease
is primarily due to a decrease in our provision for REO loss, which decreased from $37.0 million to
$6.1 million, a decrease of $32.1 million, net of any gain on REO and recovery of related debt
which totaled $1.2 million. The decrease in asset resolution was also partially offset by
foreclosure and additional repurchase expense that totaled $20.5 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 and $17.7 million for the same period in 2010, an increase of $2.8 million.
Six months. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, asset resolution expense decreased $13.8
million to $61.4 million compared to $75.2 million in the comparable period in 2010. The decrease
was primarily due to a decrease in our provision for REO loss, which decreased $20.5 million from
$45.1 million to $24.6 million, net of any gain on REO and recovery of related debt which totaled
$5.3 million. In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, the decrease in asset
resolution was offset in part by foreclosure and additional repurchase expense which increased from
to $42.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $30.9 million during the same
period in 2010, an increase of $11.9 million.
Federal insurance premiums
Three months. Our FDIC insurance expense was $10.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2011, as compared to $10.6 million for the same period in 2010. The increase was largely due to an
increase in our assessment base due to a change in how the assessment base used for calculating
deposit insurance is now determined as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act. After March 31, 2011, our assessment base for deposit insurance was calculated
based on our average consolidated total assets less average tangible equity during the assessment
period, as opposed to our average reported deposits. The increase in our assessment base for the
three months ended June 30, 2011, was offset in part by a lower assessment rate.
Six months. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 our FDIC insurance premiums were $19.5
million, compared to $20.7 million for the same period in 2010. The $1.2 million decrease was
primarily due to the lower deposit liabilities we carried during the 2011 period.
Warrant income
Three months. Warrant income decreased $1.5 million for the three month period ended June 30,
2011, which resulted in income of $2.0 million, compared to an income of $3.5 million during the
same period in 2010. In November 2010, 5.5 million shares of additional warrants were issued to
certain investors of the May 2008 private placement in full satisfaction of obligations under
anti-dilution provisions applicable to such investors. At June 30, 2011, total warrants stood at
6.9 million shares and were fair valued at $6.5 million, compared to $9.3 million at December 31,
2010. At June 30, 2010, the net total of warrants stood at 1.4 million shares and the valuation of
the warrants decreased to $2.8 million from $5.1 million at December 31, 2009. The three months
ended June 30, 2011 decrease, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 was primarily due to
the offset of the increase in the number of warrants outstanding.
Six months. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011 warrant income increased $0.5
million, which resulted in income of $2.8 million, compared to an income of $2.3 million during the
same period in 2010. In November of 2010, 5.5 million shares additional warrants were issued to
certain investors of the May 2008 private placement in full satisfaction of obligations under
anti-dilution provisions applicable to such investors. At June 30, 2011, total warrants stood at
6.9 million shares and were fair valued at $6.5 million, compared to $9.3 million at December 31,
2010. At June 30, 2010, the net total of warrants stood at 1.4 million shares and the valuation of
warrants decreased to $2.8 million from $5.1 million at December 31, 2009. The overall increase in
warrant income is attributable to the issuance of additional warrants, offset by the decline in
market price of our common stock since June 30, 2010.
68
General and administrative
Three months. General and administrative expense increased $8.5 million, to $20.1 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $28.6 million, which includes the $9.0 million loss on
the extinguishment of debt, for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Excluding the 2010 loss on
the extinguishment of debt, the increase was primarily due to our outside consulting, audit and
legal expenses increasing 29.3 percent, or an increase of $1.2 million from $4.0 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 to $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Six months. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 general and administrative expense
decreased $5.7 million, to $40.5 million from $46.2 million, which includes the $9.0 million loss
on the extinguishment of debt, for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Excluding the 2010 loss on
the extinguishment of debt, the increase was primarily due to a $2.4 million increase in
residential loan expenses to $4.5 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, resulting
from a $1.7 million decrease in loss mitigation administrative income and a $1.2 million increase
in miscellaneous loan expenses, partially offset by $0.8 million decrease in our servicing
outsource expenses. In addition, our outside consulting, audit and legal expenses increased 37.8
percent, an increase of $2.6 million from $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to
$9.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was offset in part by a 15.6
percent decrease or $1.1 million decrease in loan documentation expenses of $6.2 million for the
period ended June 30, 2011, compared to $7.3 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
Provision (Benefit) for Federal Income Taxes
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, our provision (benefit) for federal
income taxes as a percentage of pretax loss was 0.4 percent and 0.5 percent, respectively. For the
comparable 2010 periods, we recorded no provision (benefit) for federal income taxes. For each
period, the provision (benefit) for federal income taxes varies from statutory rates primarily
because of an addition to our valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets.
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Under this
pronouncement, deferred taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. In addition, a deferred tax asset is recorded for net operating loss
carry forwards and unused tax credits. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates that will apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes
the enactment date.
We periodically review the carrying amount of our deferred tax assets to determine if the
establishment of a valuation allowance is necessary. If based on the available evidence, it is
more likely than not that all or a portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized in
future periods, a deferred tax valuation allowance would be established. Consideration is given to
all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets.
In evaluating this available evidence, we consider historical financial performance,
expectation of future earnings, the ability to carry back losses to recoup taxes previously paid,
length of statutory carry forward periods, experience with operating loss and tax credit carry
forwards not expiring unused, tax planning strategies and timing of reversals of temporary
differences. Significant judgment is required in assessing future earnings trends and the timing
of reversals of temporary differences. Our evaluation is based on current tax laws as well as our
expectations of future performance.
FASB ASC Topic 740 suggests that additional scrutiny should be given to deferred tax assets of
an entity with cumulative pre-tax losses during the three most recent years. This is widely
considered to be significant negative evidence that is objective and verifiable and, therefore,
difficult to overcome. We had such cumulative pre-tax losses in 2009 and 2010, and we considered
this evidence in our analysis of deferred tax assets. Additionally, based on the continued
economic uncertainty that persists at this time, we believe that it is probable that we will not
generate significant pre-tax income in the near term. As a result of these two significant facts,
we recorded a $365.3 million valuation allowance against deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2011.
See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements
herein.
69
Analysis of Items on Statements of Financial Condition
Assets
Interest-earning deposits
Interest-earning deposits, on which we earn a minimal interest rate (25 basis points),
decreased $191.6 million to $701.9 million at June 30, 2011. The decrease compared to December 31,
2010, was primarily due to a redeployment of interest-earning deposits into commercial and
specialty loan originations and warehouse lending. Our interest-earning deposits allow the
flexibility to fund our on-going initiatives to increase commercial and specialty lending, as well
as other mortgage related initiatives.
70
Securities classified as trading
Securities classified as trading are comprised of U.S. Treasury bonds and non-investment grade
residual securities. Changes to the fair value of trading securities are recorded in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations. At June 30, 2011 there were $292.4 million in U.S. Treasury
bonds in trading, compared to $160.8 million in U.S. Treasury bonds at December 31, 2010. U.S.
Treasury bonds held in trading are used as an offset against changes in the valuation of the MSR
portfolio, however, these securities do not qualify as an accounting hedge as defined in U.S. GAAP.
See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements
herein.
Securities classified as available-for-sale
Securities classified as available-for-sale, which are comprised of U.S. government sponsored
agency mortgage-backed securities and CMOs, increased to $551.2 million at June 30, 2011, from
$475.2 million at December 31, 2010. See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
Loans available-for-sale
A majority of our mortgage loans produced are sold into the secondary market on a whole loan
basis or by securitizing the loans into mortgage-backed securities. At June 30, 2011, we held
loans available-for-sale of $2.0 billion, which was a decrease of $0.6 billion from $2.6 billion
held at December 31, 2010. Loan origination is typically inversely related to the level of
long-term interest rates. As long-term rates decrease, we tend to originate an increasing number
of mortgage loans. A significant amount of the loan origination activity during periods of falling
interest rates is derived from refinancing of existing mortgage loans. Conversely, during periods
of increasing long-term rates, loan originations tend to decrease. The decrease in the balance of
loans available-for-sale was principally attributable to the timing of loan sales. During the six
months ended June 30, 2011, the Company sold $80.3 million of non-performing residential first
mortgage loans in the available-for-sale category at a sale price which approximated carrying
value. For further information on our loans available-for-sale, see Note 5 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
Loans repurchased with government guarantees
Pursuant to Ginnie Mae servicing guidelines, we have the unilateral option to repurchase
certain delinquent loans securitized in Ginnie Mae pools, if the loans meet defined criteria. As a
result of this unilateral option, once the delinquency criteria have been met, and regardless of
whether the repurchase option has been exercised, we must treat the loans as having been
repurchased and recognize the loans on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition and also
recognize a corresponding deemed liability for a similar amount. If the loans are actually
repurchased, we eliminate the corresponding liability. At June 30, 2011, the amount of such loans
actually repurchased totaled $1.7 billion and were classified as loans repurchased with government
guarantees, and those loans which we have not yet repurchased but had the unilateral right to
repurchase totaled $104.2 million and were classified as loans available-for-sale.
At December 31, 2010, the amount of such loans actually repurchased totaled $1.7 billion and
were classified as loans repurchased with government guarantees, and those loans which we have not
yet repurchased but had the unilateral right to repurchase totaled $112.0 million and were
classified as loans available-for-sale. The loans repurchased with government guarantees remained
relatively stable from December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011.
Substantially all of these loans continue to be insured or guaranteed by Ginnie Mae and our
management believes that the reimbursement process is proceeding appropriately. On average, claims
have historically been filed and paid within approximately 18 months from the date of the initial
delinquency, however, increasing volumes throughout the country, as well as changes in the
foreclosure process in states throughout the country and other forms of government intervention may
result in changes to the historical norm. These repurchased loans earn interest at a statutory
rate, which varies for each loan, but is based on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate at the time
the loan becomes 90 days delinquent. This interest is recorded as interest income and the related
claims settlement expenses are recorded in asset resolution expense on the Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
Loans held-for-investment
Our largest category of earning assets consists of loans held-for-investment. Loans
held-for-investment consist of residential first mortgage loans that are not held for resale
(usually shorter duration and adjustable rate loans and second mortgages), other consumer loans,
commercial real estate loans, construction loans, warehouse loans to other mortgage lenders, and
various types of commercial loans such as business lines of credit, working capital loans and
equipment loans and leases. Loans held-for-investment decreased from $6.3 billion at December 31,
2010, to $6.0 billion at June 30, 2011 primarily due to warehouse loans decreasing 28.7 percent at
June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010, as a result of the lower loan origination volume.
Commercial real estate loans decreased $139.2 million to $1.1 billion, primarily due to the second
quarter 2011 sale of $37.2 million non-performing commercial real estate loans. Residential first
mortgage loans held-for-investment
71
decreased $40.4 million to $3.7 billion, HELOC loans decreased
$32.9 million to $241.4 million, and second mortgage loans
decreased $19.3 million to $155.5 million, from December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011. These
portfolios continued to decrease as we continued to primarily originate residential first mortgage
loans for sale rather than investment. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of
$90.3 million in commercial and industrial loans as we began to execute our on-going initiatives to
increase commercial lending. For information relating to the concentration of credit of our loans
held for investment, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1.
Financial Statement and Supplementary Data, herein.
Quality of Earning Assets
The following table sets forth certain information about our non-performing assets as of the end of each of the last five quarters.
NON-PERFORMING LOANS AND ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-performing loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
403,381 |
|
|
$ |
368,152 |
|
|
$ |
318,416 |
|
|
$ |
911,372 |
|
|
$ |
1,013,828 |
|
Real estate and other non-performing assets, net (1) |
|
|
110,050 |
|
|
|
178,774 |
|
|
|
179,557 |
|
|
|
229,750 |
|
|
|
226,215 |
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets held-for-investment, net |
|
|
513,431 |
|
|
|
546,926 |
|
|
|
497,973 |
|
|
|
1,141,122 |
|
|
|
1,240,043 |
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans available-for-sale |
|
|
5,341 |
|
|
|
6,598 |
|
|
|
94,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets including loans available-for-sale |
|
$ |
518,773 |
|
|
$ |
553,524 |
|
|
$ |
592,862 |
|
|
$ |
1,141,122 |
|
|
$ |
1,240,043 |
|
|
|
|
Ratio of non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|
4.35 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
9.06 |
% |
Ratio of non-performing loans held for
investment to loans held-for-investment (1)
|
|
|
6.75 |
% |
|
|
6.39 |
% |
|
|
5.05 |
% |
|
|
12.46 |
% |
|
|
13.76 |
% |
Ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held
for investment |
|
|
67.9 |
% |
|
|
73.6 |
% |
|
|
86.1 |
% |
|
|
52.0 |
% |
|
|
52.3 |
% |
Ratio of allowance to loans held-for-investment |
|
|
4.59 |
% |
|
|
4.70 |
% |
|
|
4.35 |
% |
|
|
6.48 |
% |
|
|
7.20 |
% |
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans held-for-
investment (2) |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
1.48 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the second quarter of 2011, approximately $30 million was reclassified from
real estate and other non-performing assets to non-
performing loans. This was related to the classifications described in Note 6 of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1.
Financial Statement and Supplemental Data, herein. Excluding this reclassification, the ratio
of non-performing loans held for investment to
total loans held-for-investment would have been 6.28% at June 30, 2011. |
(2) At December 31, 2010, net charge-off to average loans held-for-investment ratio was
6.26%, including the loss recorded on the
non-performing loan sale.
The following table provides the activity for non-performing commercial assets, which
includes commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
240,006 |
|
|
$ |
327,311 |
|
|
$ |
451,984 |
|
|
$ |
253,934 |
|
|
$ |
440,948 |
|
Additions |
|
|
36,003 |
|
|
|
23,380 |
|
|
|
73,609 |
|
|
|
63,896 |
|
|
|
118,306 |
|
Returned to performing |
|
|
(3,729 |
) |
|
|
(11,606 |
) |
|
|
(45,110 |
) |
|
|
(18,701 |
) |
|
|
(53,922 |
) |
Principal payments |
|
|
(8,803 |
) |
|
|
(8,873 |
) |
|
|
(4,927 |
) |
|
|
(10,647 |
) |
|
|
(13,449 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
(78,237 |
) |
|
|
(21,058 |
) |
|
|
(8,426 |
) |
|
|
(82,480 |
) |
|
|
(17,054 |
) |
Charge-offs, net of recoveries |
|
|
(25,504 |
) |
|
|
(46,204 |
) |
|
|
(30,238 |
) |
|
|
(44,112 |
) |
|
|
(37,937 |
) |
Valuation write-downs |
|
|
(3,484 |
) |
|
|
(9,016 |
) |
|
|
(16,140 |
) |
|
|
(5,638 |
) |
|
|
(16,140 |
) |
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
156,252 |
|
|
$ |
253,934 |
|
|
$ |
420,752 |
|
|
$ |
156,252 |
|
|
$ |
420,752 |
|
|
|
|
Delinquent loans held-for-investment. Loans are considered to be delinquent when any payment
of principal or interest is past due. While it is the goal of management to work out a
satisfactory repayment schedule or modification with a delinquent borrower, we will undertake
foreclosure proceedings if the delinquency is not satisfactorily resolved. Our procedures
regarding delinquent loans are designed to assist borrowers in meeting their contractual
obligations. We customarily mail several notices of past due payments to the borrower within 30
days after the due date and late charges are assessed in accordance with certain parameters. Our
collection department makes telephone or personal contact with borrowers
72
after a 30-day
delinquency. In certain cases, we recommend that the borrower seek credit-counseling assistance
and may grant forbearance if it is determined that the borrower is likely to correct a loan
delinquency within a reasonable period of time. We cease the accrual of interest on loans that we
classify as non-performing because they are more than 90 days delinquent or earlier when concerns
exist as to the ultimate collection of principal or interest. Such interest is recognized as
income only
when it is actually collected.
At June 30, 2011, we had $542.2 million loans held-for-investment that were determined to be
delinquent. Of those delinquent loans, $403.4 million of loans were non-performing
held-for-investment, of which $286.1 million, or 70.9 percent, were single-family residential first
mortgage loans. At December 31, 2010, $505.6 million in loans were determined to be delinquent, of
which $318.4 million of loans were non-performing, and of which $130.4 million, or 41.0 percent
were single-family residential first mortgage loans. At June 30, 2011, non-performing loans
available-for-sale totaled $5.3 million, compared to $94.9 million at December 31, 2010. The $89.6
million decrease from December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011 in non-performing loans
available-for-sale, was primarily due to the sale of $80.3 million of non-performing residential
first mortgage loans at a sale price which approximated carrying value in the first and second
quarters of 2011.
Residential first mortgage loans. As of June 30, 2011, non-performing residential first
mortgages increased to $286.1 million, up $166.2 million or 138.6 percent, from $119.9 million at
December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2011, residential first mortgage loans performing and not reported
delinquent within the last 36 months were $2.2 billion, or 59.8 percent of total residential first mortgage loans. At December
31, 2010, residential first mortgage loans performing and not reported
delinquent within the last 36 months were $2.3 billion,
or 61.5 percent of total residential first mortgage loans. Although our portfolio is diversified throughout the United States, the largest
concentrations of loans are in California, Florida and Michigan. Each of those real estate markets
has experienced steep declines in real estate values beginning in 2007 and continuing through 2010
and 2011. Net charge-offs within the residential first mortgage portfolio totaled $10.4 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $74.0 million for the comparable period in
2010. This reduction in net charge-offs is due to the sale or transfer to available-for-sale of
substantially all of the non-performing residential first mortgages in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Management expects the lower level of net charge-offs to continue for the remainder of 2011.
Commercial real estate loans. The commercial real estate portfolio experienced some
deterioration in credit beginning in mid-2007 primarily in the commercial land residential
development loans. Credit deterioration in this segment has slowed in 2010 and 2011.
Non-performing commercial real estate loans have decreased to 9.3 percent of the portfolio at June
30, 2011 down from 14.1 percent as of December 31, 2010. Net charge-offs within the commercial
real estate portfolio totaled $44.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 an increase from
$39.6 million for comparable period in 2010.
Loan modifications. We may modify certain loans to retain customers or to maximize collection
of the loan balance. We have maintained several programs designed to assist borrowers by extending
payment dates or reducing the borrowers contractual payments. All loan modifications are made on
a case by case basis. Loan modification programs for borrowers implemented have resulted in a
significant increase in restructured loans. These loans are classified as trouble debt
restructurings (TDRs) and are included in non-accrual loans if the loan was non-accruing prior to
the restructuring or if the payment amount increased significantly. These loans will continue on
non-accrual status until the borrower has established a willingness and ability to make the
restructured payments for at least six months.
The following table sets forth information regarding TDRs at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDRs |
|
|
Performing |
|
Non-performing |
|
Total |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Consumer loans (1)
|
|
$ |
532,960 |
|
|
$ |
120,397 |
|
|
$ |
653,357 |
|
Commercial loans (2)
|
|
|
21,481 |
|
|
|
29,781 |
|
|
|
51,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
554,441 |
|
|
$ |
150,178 |
|
|
$ |
704,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consumer loans include: residential first mortgage, second mortgage, construction,
warehouse lending, HELOC and other consumer loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Commercial loans include: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and
commercial lease financing loans. |
73
The following table sets forth information regarding delinquent loans at the dates
listed. At June 30, 2011, 76.4 percent of all delinquent loans were loans in which we had a
first lien position on residential real estate.
DELINQUENT LOANS HELD-FOR-INVESTMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Delinquent |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
30 - 59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
84,265 |
|
|
$ |
96,768 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
3,587 |
|
HELOC |
|
|
3,815 |
|
|
|
3,735 |
|
Other |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
28,245 |
|
|
|
|
Total 30- 59 days delinquent |
|
|
92,577 |
|
|
|
133,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 - 89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
|
42,911 |
|
|
|
40,821 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
HELOC |
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
3,783 |
|
Other |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
6,783 |
|
|
|
|
Total 60- 89 days delinquent |
|
|
46,269 |
|
|
|
53,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
|
286,083 |
|
|
|
119,903 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
6,242 |
|
|
|
7,480 |
|
Construction |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
5,212 |
|
|
|
6,713 |
|
Other |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
4,918 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
103,014 |
|
|
|
175,559 |
|
|
|
|
Total 90+ days delinquent |
|
|
403,381 |
|
|
|
318,416 |
|
|
|
|
Total delinquent loans |
|
$ |
542,227 |
|
|
$ |
505,610 |
|
|
|
|
We calculate our delinquent loans using a method required by the OTS when we prepare
regulatory reports that we submit to the OTS each quarter. This method, also called the OTS
Method, considers a loan to be delinquent if no payment is received after the first day of the
month following the month of the missed payment. Other companies with mortgage banking operations
similar to ours may use the Mortgage Bankers Association Method (MBA Method) which considers a
loan to be delinquent if payment is not received by the end of the month of the missed payment.
The key difference between the two methods is that a loan considered delinquent under the MBA
Method would not be considered delinquent under the OTS Method for another 30 days. Under the
MBA Method of calculating delinquent loans, 30 day delinquencies equaled $162.2 million, 60 day
delinquencies equaled $90.8 million and 90+ day delinquencies equaled $449.2 million at June 30,
2011. Total delinquent loans under the MBA Method total $702.2 million or 11.8 percent of loans
held-for-investment at June 30, 2011. By comparison, 30 day delinquencies equaled $215.0 million,
60 day delinquencies equaled $111.4 million and 90+ day delinquencies equaled $365.0 million at
December 31, 2010 under the MBA Method and total delinquent loans under the MBA Method were $691.4
million or 11.0 percent of loans held-for-investment at December 31, 2010.
74
The following table sets
forth information regarding non-performing loans (i.e., 90+ days delinquent loans) as to which we
have ceased accruing interest:
NON-ACCRUAL LOANS HELD-FOR-INVESTMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of |
|
|
As a % of |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
Specified |
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
3,744,342 |
|
|
$ |
286,083 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
71.0 |
% |
Second mortgage |
|
|
155,537 |
|
|
|
6,242 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Construction |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
513,678 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
241,396 |
|
|
|
5,212 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
77,052 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
4,732,903 |
|
|
|
298,715 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,111,131 |
|
|
|
102,612 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
99,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
31,927 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
1,242,231 |
|
|
|
104,228 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
5,975,134 |
|
|
$ |
402,943 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(274,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held-for-investment, net |
|
$ |
5,701,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the non-performing loans (i.e., 90+ days delinquent loans)
residential first mortgage loans by year of origination (i.e., vintage) and the total amount of unpaid
principal balance loans outstanding at June 30, 2011.
RESIDENTIAL FIRST MORTGAGE LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
Vintage |
|
Performing Loans |
|
|
Non-Accrual Loans |
|
|
Balance(1) |
|
Pre-2003 |
|
$ |
93,110 |
|
|
$ |
4,440 |
|
|
$ |
97,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
247,516 |
|
|
|
9,267 |
|
|
|
256,783 |
|
2004 |
|
|
692,612 |
|
|
|
19,599 |
|
|
|
712,211 |
|
2005 |
|
|
707,744 |
|
|
|
35,005 |
|
|
|
742,749 |
|
2006 |
|
|
347,608 |
|
|
|
39,352 |
|
|
|
386,960 |
|
2007 |
|
|
1,133,055 |
|
|
|
128,067 |
|
|
|
1,261,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
85,433 |
|
|
|
41,316 |
|
|
|
126,749 |
|
2009 |
|
|
64,742 |
|
|
|
8,298 |
|
|
|
73,040 |
|
2010 |
|
|
28,517 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
29,256 |
|
2011 |
|
|
22,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
3,423,185 |
|
|
$ |
286,083 |
|
|
$ |
3,709,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred fees
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential
first mortgage
loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,744,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include net deferred fees, premiums or discounts, and other. |
Asset sale. On November 15, 2010, we sold $474.0 million of non-performing
residential first mortgage loans and transferred $104.2 million of additional non-performing
residential first mortgage loans to the available-for-sale category. The sale and the adjustment to
market value on the transfer resulted in a $176.5 million loss which has been reflected as an
increase in the provision for loan losses. During the first quarter 2011, we sold $80.3
million of the $104.2 million non-performing residential first mortgage loans in the
available-for-sale category at a sale price which approximated carrying value. During the second
quarter 2011, we sold $68.1 million of non-performing commercial real estate assets, which resulted
in a $0.6 million gain included in net gain on sale of assets.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of probable losses in our loans
held-for-investment portfolio as of the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The
allowance provides for probable losses that have been identified with specific customer
relationships and for probable losses believed to be inherent in the loan portfolio but that have
not been specifically identified.
We perform a detailed credit quality review at least annually on large commercial loans as
well as on selected other smaller balance commercial loans. Commercial and commercial real estate
loans that are determined to be substandard and certain delinquent residential first mortgage loans
that exceed $1.0 million are treated as impaired and are individually evaluated to determine the
necessity of a specific allowance. Accounting standards require a specific allowance to be
established as a component of the allowance for loan losses when it is probable all amounts due
will not be collected pursuant to the contractual terms of the loan and the recorded investment in
the loan exceeds its fair value. Fair value is measured using either the present value of the
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the observable market
price of the loan, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, reduced
by estimated disposal costs. In estimating the fair value of collateral, we utilize outside
fee-based appraisers to evaluate various factors such as occupancy and rental rates in our real
estate markets and the level of obsolescence that may exist on assets acquired from commercial
business loans.
A portion of the allowance is also allocated to the remaining classified commercial loans by
applying projected loss ratios, based on numerous factors identified below, to the loans within the
different risk ratings.
Additionally, management has sub-divided the homogeneous portfolios, including consumer and
residential first mortgage loans, into categories that have exhibited a greater loss exposure such
as delinquent and modified loans. The portion of the allowance allocated to other consumer and
residential mortgage loans is determined by applying projected loss ratios to
75
various segments of the loan portfolio. Projected loss ratios incorporate factors such as
recent charge-off experience, current economic conditions and trends, and trends with respect to
past due and non-accrual amounts.
Our assessments of loss exposure from the homogeneous risk pools discussed above are based
upon consideration of the historical loss rates associated with those pools of loans. Such loans
are included within residential first mortgage loans, as to which we establish a reserve based on a
number of factors, such as days past due, delinquency and severity rates in the portfolio,
loan-to-value ratios based on most recently available appraisals or broker price opinions, and
availability of mortgage insurance or government guarantees. The severity rates used in the
determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses are indicative of, and thereby
inclusive of consideration of, declining collateral values.
As the process for determining the adequacy of the allowance requires subjective and complex
judgment by management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain, subsequent
evaluations of the loan portfolio, in light of the factors then prevailing, may result in
significant changes in the allowance for loan losses. In estimating the amount of credit losses
inherent in our loan portfolio various assumptions are made. For example, when assessing the
condition of the overall economic environment assumptions are made regarding current economic
trends and their impact on the loan portfolio. If the anticipated recovery is not as strong or
timely as managements expectations, it may affect the estimate of the allowance for loan losses.
For impaired loans that are collateral dependent, the estimated fair value of the collateral may
deviate significantly from the net proceeds received when the collateral is sold.
Management maintains an unallocated allowance to recognize the uncertainty and imprecision
underlying the process of estimating expected loan losses for the entire loan portfolio.
Determination of the probable losses inherent in the portfolio, which is not necessarily captured
by the allocation methodology discussed above, involves the exercise of judgment.
The allowance for loan losses remained at $274.0 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans decreased to 67.9
percent from 86.1 percent at December 31, 2010. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of
investment loans increased to 4.59 percent as of June 30, 2011 from 4.35 percent as of December 31,
2010.
Allowance for Unfunded Lending Commitments
The liability for credit losses inherent in lending-related commitments, such as letters of
credit and unfunded loan commitments is included in secondary market reserve on the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition. We establish the amount of this reserve by considering both
historical trends and current market conditions quarterly, or more often if deemed necessary. Our
liability for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments has decreased by $0.5 million from
December 31, 2010, to $3.3 million at June 30, 2011. When combined with our allowance for loan and
lease losses, our total allowance for credit losses represented 4.64 percent of loans at June 30,
2011 compared to 4.40 percent at December 31, 2010.
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the allocation of our allowance
for loan losses to each loan category.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
of |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Percentage to Total |
|
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage |
|
$ |
3,744,342 |
|
|
|
62.7 |
% |
|
$ |
145,244 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
% |
Second mortgage |
|
|
155,537 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
20,097 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Construction |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
513,678 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
HELOC |
|
|
241,396 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
16,230 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
77,052 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
4,732,903 |
|
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
185,218 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,111,131 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
81,128 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
99,173 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2,320 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
31,927 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
1,242,231 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
83,624 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer and commercial loans |
|
$ |
5,975,134 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
274,000 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
76
The allowance for loan losses is considered adequate based upon managements assessment of
relevant factors, including the types and amounts of non-performing loans, historical and current
loss experience on such types of loans, and the
current economic environment.
The following table shows the activity in the allowance for loan losses during the indicated
periods:
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
271,000 |
|
|
$ |
538,000 |
|
|
$ |
274,000 |
|
|
$ |
524,000 |
|
Provision charged to operations |
|
|
48,384 |
|
|
|
86,019 |
|
|
|
76,693 |
|
|
|
149,579 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(47,265 |
) |
|
|
(96,088 |
) |
|
|
(81,384 |
) |
|
|
(147,648 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
4,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
274,000 |
|
|
$ |
530,000 |
|
|
$ |
274,000 |
|
|
$ |
530,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for Unfunded Commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
Provision charged to operations |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth information regarding non-performing loans (i.e., over 90
days delinquent loans) at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Non-performing loans |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans secured by real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home loans secured by first lien |
|
$ |
286,083 |
|
|
$ |
119,903 |
|
Home loans secured by second lien |
|
|
6,242 |
|
|
|
7,480 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
5,212 |
|
|
|
6,713 |
|
Construction residential |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
103,014 |
|
|
|
175,559 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans secured by real
estate |
|
|
401,477 |
|
|
|
312,676 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other consumer |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
4,918 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans held in portfolio |
|
$ |
403,381 |
|
|
$ |
318,416 |
|
|
|
|
In response to increasing rates of delinquency and steeply declining market values, management
implemented a program to modify the terms of existing loans in an effort to mitigate losses and
keep borrowers in their homes. These modification programs began in the latter months of 2009 and
increased substantially in 2010 and 2011. As of June 30, 2011, we had $704.6 million in
restructured loans in the loans held-for-investment portfolio, of which $150.2 million were
included in non-performing loans.
77
Restructured loans by loan type are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Restructured Loans |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential first mortgage loans |
|
$ |
638,646 |
|
|
$ |
654,414 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
14,711 |
|
|
|
15,633 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
51,222 |
|
|
|
98,590 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
704,619 |
|
|
$ |
768,679 |
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
Accrued interest receivable increased from $83.9 million at December 31, 2010 to $91.5 million
at June 30, 2011. Our total earning assets decreased $860.0 million to $11.0 billion at June 30,
2011, compared to $11.8 billion at December 31, 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011,
$11.1 million of accrued interest on non-performing loans was charged off. We typically collect
interest in the month following the month in which it is earned.
Repossessed assets
Real property we acquire as a result of the foreclosure process is classified as real estate
owned until it is sold. It is transferred from the loans held-for-investment portfolio at the
lower of cost or market value, less disposal costs. Management decides whether to rehabilitate the
property or sell it as is and whether to list the property with a broker. At June 30, 2011,
repossessed assets totaled $110.0 million, compared to $151.1million at December 31, 2010. The
decrease was primarily due to the $30.9 million sales of real estate owned in the commercial real
estate portfolio.
Recently, increased attention has been placed in the mortgage banking industrys documentation
and review associated with foreclosure processes. We believe our foreclosure processes follow
established safeguards, and we routinely review our policies and procedures to reconfirm the
foreclosure asset quality.
The following schedule provides the activity for repossessed assets during each of the past
five quarters:
Net Repossessed Asset Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
146,372 |
|
|
$ |
151,085 |
|
|
$ |
98,585 |
|
|
$ |
198,230 |
|
|
$ |
167,265 |
|
Additions |
|
|
16,229 |
|
|
|
24,976 |
|
|
|
17,535 |
|
|
|
55,522 |
|
|
|
91,119 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(52,551 |
) |
|
|
(29,689 |
) |
|
|
(65,035 |
) |
|
|
(55,167 |
) |
|
|
(60,154 |
) |
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
110,050 |
|
|
$ |
146,372 |
|
|
$ |
151,085 |
|
|
$ |
198,585 |
|
|
$ |
198,230 |
|
|
|
|
FHLB stock
At June 30, 2011, holdings of FHLB stock decreased $35.5 million to $301.7 million from $337.2
at December 31, 2010. Once purchased, FHLB shares must be held for five years before they can be
redeemed. As a member of the FHLB, we are required to hold shares of FHLB stock in an amount equal
to at least 1.0 percent of aggregate unpaid principal balance of our mortgage loans, home purchase
contracts and similar obligations at the beginning of each year, or 5.0 percent of our FHLB
advances, whichever is greater. The $35.5 million decrease was due to a repurchase of 354,535
shares, $100 par value, of excess stock by the FHLB.
Premises and equipment
Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, totaled $244.6 million at June 30,
2011, an increase of $12.4 million, or 5.3 percent from $232.2 million at December 31, 2010. Our
investment in equipment increased due to technology upgrades.
78
Mortgage servicing rights
At June 30, 2011, MSRs included residential MSRs at fair value amounting to $577.4 million.
At December 31, 2010, residential MSRs amounted to $580.3 million. During the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded additions to our residential MSRs of $88.9 million and $93.4
million, respectively, due to loan sales or securitizations. Also, during the six months ended
June 30, 2011, we reduced the amount of MSRs by $47.1 million related to bulk servicing sales, 27.8
million related to loans that paid off during the period, and a decrease of $16.9 million related
to the realization of expected cash flows and market driven changes, primarily as a result of
decreases in mortgage loan rates that led to an expected increase in prepayment speeds. Consumer
MSRs were eliminated during 2010 upon the transfer to a backup servicer pursuant to the applicable
servicing agreements. See Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item
1. Financial Statements herein.
The principal balance of the loans underlying our total MSRs was $57.1 billion at June 30,
2011, compared to $56.0 billion at December 31, 2010, with the decrease primarily attributable to
our bulk servicing sales of $4.7 billion in underlying loans partially offset by loan origination
activity for 2011.
Liabilities
Deposits
Our deposits can be subdivided into four areas: retail banking, government banking, national
accounts and company controlled deposits. Retail deposit accounts decreased $172.6 million, or 3.2
percent to $5.2 billion at June 30, 2011, from $5.4 billion at December 31, 2010. Saving and
checking accounts totaled 35.7 percent of total retail deposits at June 30, 2011. In addition, at
June 30, 2011, retail certificates of deposit totaled $2.8 billion, with an average balance of
$33,548 and a weighted average cost of 1.8 percent while money market deposits totaled $588.2
million, with an average cost of 0.73 percent Overall, the retail division had an average cost of
deposits of 1.21 percent at June 30, 2011 versus 1.5 percent at December 31, 2010, reflecting
increases in demand, savings and money market accounts balances as the Bank emphasizes development
of its core deposit base and reduces its emphasis on certificates of deposit.
We call on local governmental agencies as another source for deposit funding. Government
banking deposits increased $10.9 million, or 1.6 percent, to $674.9 million at June 30, 2011, from
$664.0 million at December 31, 2010. These balances fluctuate during the year as the governmental
agencies collect semi-annual assessments and make necessary disbursements over the following
six-months. These deposits had a weighted average cost of 0.67 percent and 0.72 percent at June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. These deposit accounts include $210.6 million of certificates of
deposit with maturities typically less than one year and $445.6 million in checking and savings
accounts at June 30, 2011.
In past years, our national accounts division garnered wholesale deposits through the use of
investment banking firms. However, no new wholesale deposits were obtained in 2010 or thus far in
2011. During the first half of 2011 wholesale deposit accounts decreased by $180.1 million, or 20.4
percent, to $703.2 million at June 30, 2011, from $883.3 million at December 31, 2010. These
deposits had a weighted average cost of 3.28 percent at June 30, 2011 versus 3.04 percent at
December 31, 2010.
Company controlled deposits arise due to our servicing of loans for others and represent the
portion of the investor custodial accounts on deposit with the Bank. These deposits do not
currently bear interest. Company controlled deposits decreased $251.3 million to $815.2 million at
June 30, 2011 from $1.1 billion at December 31, 2010.
We participate in the Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program,
through which certain customer certificates of deposit (CD) are exchanged for CDs of similar
amounts from other participating banks. This gives customers the potential to receive FDIC
insurance up to $50.0 million. At June 30, 2011, $643.0 million of total CDs were enrolled in the
CDARS program, with $577.9 million originating from public entities and $70.6 million originating
from retail customers. In exchange, we received reciprocal CDs from other participating banks
totaling $106.9 million from public entities and $536.1 million from retail customers at June 30,
2011.
79
The composition of our deposits was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit Portfolio |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End |
|
|
Of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
End |
|
|
Of |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Demand accounts |
|
$ |
622,645 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
$ |
589,926 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Savings accounts |
|
|
1,236,199 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
1,011,512 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
MMDA |
|
|
588,165 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
552,000 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Certificates of deposit (2) |
|
|
2,764,782 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
3,230,972 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail deposits |
|
|
5,211,791 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
5,384,410 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
Demand accounts |
|
|
61,824 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
78,611 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
383,771 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
337,602 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
229,274 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
247,763 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total government deposits (3) |
|
|
674,869 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
663,976 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
National accounts |
|
|
703,201 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
883,270 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Company controlled deposits (4) |
|
|
815,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
1,066,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits (5) |
|
$ |
7,405,027 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7,998,099 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This rate reflects the average rate for the deposit portfolio at the end of the noted
month. |
|
(2) |
|
The aggregate amount of certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of $100,000 was
approximately $1.5 billion and $1.7 billion at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Government accounts include funds from municipalities and schools. |
|
(4) |
|
These accounts represent a portion of the investor custodial accounts and escrows controlled
by the Company in connection with loans serviced for others and that have been placed on
deposit with the Bank. |
|
(5) |
|
The aggregate amount of deposits with a balance over $250,000 was approximately $1.2 billion
and $1.2 billion at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
FHLB advances
FHLB advances decreased $318.5 million, or 8.6 percent, to $3.4 billion at June 30, 2011, from
$3.7 billion at December 31, 2010. We rely upon advances from the FHLB as a source of funding for
the origination or purchase of loans for sale in the secondary market and for providing duration
specific short-term and medium-term financing. The outstanding balance of FHLB advances fluctuates
from time to time depending upon our current inventory of mortgage loans available-for-sale and the
availability of lower cost funding sources such as repurchase agreements.
Security repurchase agreements
In the second quarter of 2010 we prepaid our entire balance of security repurchase agreements,
totaling $310.6 million. We made no new borrowings utilizing security repurchase agreements.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are generally accounted for as collateralized
financing transactions and are recorded at the amounts at which the securities were sold plus
accrued interest. Securities, generally mortgage-backed securities, are pledged as collateral
under these financing arrangements. The fair value of collateral provided to a party is
continually monitored, and additional collateral is obtained or requested to be returned, as
appropriate.
Long-term debt
As part of our overall capital strategy, we previously raised capital through the issuance of
trust-preferred securities by our special purpose financing entities formed for the offerings. The
trust preferred securities outstanding mature 30 years from issuance, are callable after five
years, and pay interest quarterly. The majority of the net proceeds from these offerings has been
contributed to the Bank as additional paid in capital and subject to regulatory limitations, is
includable as Tier 1 regulatory capital. Under these trust preferred arrangements, we have the
right to defer dividend payments to the trust preferred security holders for up to five years.
Based upon recently-enacted federal banking legislation, trust preferred securities may no longer
be included as part of the Banks Tier 1 capital issued after May 19, 2010, and existing trust
preferred securities may remain includable in Tier 1 capital only if the Bank had total assets of
$15.0 billion or less at December 31, 2010. On such date, the Bank had assets below that amount,
and its trust preferred securities therefore should remain includable in Tier 1 capital even if the
Banks assets subsequently increase above the $15.0 billion asset level.
80
Accrued interest payable
Accrued interest payable decreased $2.1 million, or 15.7 percent, to $10.9 million at June 30,
2011 from $13.0 million at December 31, 2010. These amounts represent interest payments that are
payable to depositors and other entities from which we borrowed funds. These balances fluctuate
with the size of our interest-bearing liability portfolio and the average cost of our
interest-bearing liabilities. The decrease was primarily a result of the decrease in rates on our
deposit accounts. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the average overall rate on our
deposits decreased 72 basis points to 1.6 percent from 2.3 percent for the same period in 2010.
Secondary market reserve
We sell most of the residential first mortgage loans that we originate into the secondary
mortgage market. When we sell mortgage loans we make customary representations and warranties to
the purchasers , including securitization trusts we sponsored, about various characteristics of
each loan, such as the manner of origination, the nature and extent of underwriting standards
applied and the types of documentation being provided. Typically these representations and
warranties are in place for the life of the loan. If a defect in the origination process is
identified, we may be required to either repurchase the loan or indemnify the purchaser for losses
it sustains on the loan. If there are no such defects, we have no liability to the purchaser for
losses it may incur on such loan. We maintain a secondary market reserve to account for the
expected losses related to loans we might be required to repurchase (or the indemnity payments we
may have to make to purchasers). The secondary market reserve takes into account both our estimate
of expected losses on loans sold during the current accounting period, as well as adjustments to
our previous estimates of expected losses on loans sold. In each case these estimates are based on
our most recent data regarding loan repurchases, and actual credit losses on repurchased loans,
among other factors increases to the secondary market reserve for current loan sales reduce our net
gain on loan sales. Adjustments to our previous estimates are recorded as an increase or decrease
in our other fees and charges. The amount of the secondary market reserve equaled $79.4 million at
both June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we increased the reserve by $3.7 million for new loan
sales and $41.8 million for adjustments to previous estimates of expected losses. For the same
period, we charged-off $45.5 million, net of recoveries for realized losses. For the six months
ended June 30, 2010, we increased the reserve by $13.9 million for new loan sales and $38.2 million
for adjustments to previous estimates of expected losses. For the same period, we charged-off
$42.1 million, net of recoveries for realized losses.
Other liabilities
Other liabilities increased $18.1 million to $337.8 million at June 30, 2011, from $319.7
million at December 31, 2010. Other liabilities primarily consist of undisbursed payments, escrow
accounts and the Ginnie Mae liability. The increase in other liabilities was primarily due to a
$19.3 million increase in the liability from December 31, 2010 to $37.9 million at June 30, 2011,
for escrow accounts that are maintained on behalf of mortgage customers and include funds collected
for real estate taxes, homeowners insurance and other insured product liabilities. Undisbursed
payments on loans serviced for others totaled $77.9 million and $67.2 million at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. These amounts represent payments received from borrowers for
interest, principal and related loan charges which have not been remitted to investors. The Ginnie
Mae liability totaled $104.2 million and $112.0 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. These amounts are for certain loans sold to Ginnie Mae, as to which we have not yet
repurchased, but have the unilateral right to do so. With respect to such loans sold to Ginnie
Mae, a corresponding asset was included in loans available-for-sale.
81
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Our principal uses of funds include loan originations and operating expenses. At June 30,
2011, we had outstanding rate-lock commitments to lend $2.7 billion in mortgage loans, compared to
$2.3 billion at December 31, 2010. We did not have any outstanding commitments to make other types
of loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. These commitments may expire without being drawn
upon and therefore, do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Total commercial and
consumer unused collateralized lines of credit totaled $1.5 billion at June 30, 2011, compared to
$1.4 billion at December 31, 2010.
Capital. We had a loss of $106.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011. On January
27, 2010, our stockholders, including MP Thrift exercised their rights to purchase 42.3 million
shares of our common stock for approximately $300.6 million in a rights offering which expired on
February 8, 2010. On March 31, 2010, we completed a registered offering of 57.5 million shares of
common stock. The public offering price of the common stock was $5.00 per share. MP Thrift
participated in this registered offering and purchased 20.0 million shares at $5.00 per shares. The
offering resulted in aggregate net proceeds of approximately $276.1 million, after deducting
underwriting fees and offering expenses. On May 27, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized a
1-for-10 reverse stock split immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders at which the
reverse stock split was approved by its stockholders. The reverse stock split became effective on
May 27, 2010. In connection with the reverse stock split, stockholders received one new share of
common stock for every ten shares held at the effective time. The reverse stock split reduced the
number of shares of outstanding common stock from approximately 1.53 billion to 153 million. The
number of authorized shares of common stock was reduced from 3 billion to 300 million. On April 1,
2010, MP Thrift converted $50 million of 10% convertible trust preferred securities due in 2039
into 6.25 million shares of our common stock (as adjusted for the reverse stock split). On
November 2, 2010, we completed a registered offering of 14,192,250 shares of our mandatorily
convertible non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock which included 692,250 shares issued pursuant
to the underwriter over-allotment option and a registered offering of 115,655,000 shares of our
common stock. The public offering price of the convertible preferred stock and the common stock
was $20.00 and $1.00 per share, respectively. Stockholders approved an amendment to increase the
number of authorized shares of common stock from 300,000,000 shares to 700,000,000 shares, each
share of convertible preferred stock was automatically converted into 20 shares of common stock,
based on a conversion price of $1.00 per share of common stock. MP Thrift, participated in the
registered offerings and purchased 8,884,637 shares of convertible preferred stock and 72,307,263
shares of common stock at the offering price for approximately $250.0 million. The offerings
resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $399.5 million ($384.9 million, after deducting
underwriting fees and offering expenses).
We did not pay any cash dividends on our common stock during the six months ended June 30,
2011 and during the year 2010. On February 19, 2008, our Board of Directors suspended future
dividends payable on our common stock. Under the capital distribution regulations, a savings bank
that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company must either notify or seek approval from
the OTS, or the OCC after July 21, 2011, of an association capital distribution at least 30 days
prior to the declaration of a dividend or the approval by the Board of Directors of the proposed
capital distribution. The 30-day period allows the OTS, or the OCC after July 21, 2011, to
determine whether the distribution would not be advisable. We currently must seek approval from
the OTS, or the OCC after July 21, 2011, prior to making a capital distribution from the Bank. In
addition, we are prohibited from increasing dividends on our common stock above $0.05 without the
consent of U.S. Treasury pursuant to the terms of the TARP.
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal
banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative
measures of the Banks assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under
regulatory accounting practices. The Banks capital amounts and classification are also subject to
qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
At June 30, 2011, the Bank was considered well-capitalized for regulatory purposes, with
regulatory capital ratios of 10.07 percent for Tier 1 capital and 19.73 percent for total
risk-based capital.
Liquidity. Liquidity measures the ability to meet current and future cash flow needs as they
become due. The liquidity of a financial institution reflects its ability to meet loan requests, to
accommodate possible outflows in deposits and to take advantage of interest rates and market
opportunities. The ability of a financial institution to meet its current financial obligations is
a function of its balance sheet structure, its ability to liquidate assets, and its access to
various sources of funds.
We primarily originate Agency eligible loans and therefore the majority of new loan
origination is readily convertible to cash, either by selling them as part of our monthly agency
sales, private party whole loan sales, or by pledging them to the FHLB and borrowing against them.
We use the FHLB as our primary source for managing daily borrowing needs, which allows us to borrow
or repay borrowings as daily cash needs require. We have been successful in increasing the amount
of assets that qualify as eligible collateral at the FHLB and are continually working to add more.
The most recent addition was a pool of government guaranteed loans and a pool of government
guaranteed receivables. Our commercial real estate loan portfolio has also been approved for use
as FHLB collateral though we are currently pledging those assets to support our
82
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago discount window line of credit. Adding eligible collateral pools gives us added
capacity and flexibility to manage our funding requirements.
The amount we can borrow, or the value we receive for the assets pledged to our liquidity
providers, varies based on the amount and type of pledged collateral as well as the perceived
market value of the assets and the haircut off the market value of the assets. That value is
sensitive to the pricing and policies of our liquidity providers and can change with little or no
notice.
In addition to operating expenses at a particular level of mortgage originations, our cash
flows are fairly predictable and relate primarily to the funding of residential first mortgages
(outflows) and then the securitization and sales of those mortgages (inflows). Our warehouse lines
of credit also generate cash flows as funds are extended to correspondent relationships to close
new loans. Those loans are repaid when the correspondent sells the loan. Other material cash
flows relate to the loans we service for others (primarily the agencies) and consist primarily of
principal, interest, taxes and insurance. Those monies come in over the course of the month and
are paid out based on predetermined schedules. These flows are largely a function of the size of
the servicing book and the volume of refinancing activity of the loans serviced. In general,
monies received in one month are paid during the following month with the exception of taxes and
insurance monies that are held until such are due.
As governed and defined by our internal liquidity policy, we maintain adequate liquidity
levels appropriate to cover both operational and regulatory requirements. Each business day, we
forecast a minimum of 30 days of daily cash needs and then several months beyond the near term
horizon. This allows us to determine our projected near term daily cash fluctuations and also to
plan and adjust, if necessary, future activities. As a result, we would be able to make
adjustments to operations as required to meet the liquidity needs of our business, including
adjusting deposit rates to increase deposits, planning for additional FHLB borrowings, accelerate
loans held-for-sale loan sales (agency and or private), sell loans held-for-investment or
securities, borrow using repurchase agreements, reduce originations, make changes to warehouse
funding facilities, or borrowing from the discount window.
Our liquidity position is continuously monitored and adjustments are made to the balance
between sources and uses of funds as deemed appropriate. Management is not aware of any events that
are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, capital resources or
operations.
Borrowings. The FHLB provides credit for savings banks and other member financial
institutions. We are currently authorized through a resolution of our Board of Directors to apply
for advances from the FHLB using our mortgage loans as collateral. We currently have an authorized
line of credit equal to $7.0 billion and we may access that line to the extent we provide
collateral. At June 30, 2011, we had available collateral sufficient to access $4.4 billion of the
line and had $3.4 billion of advances outstanding.
We have arrangements with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago to borrow as appropriate from
its discount window. The discount window is a borrowing facility that is intended to be used only
for short-term liquidity needs arising from special or unusual circumstances. The amount we are
allowed to borrow is based on the lendable value of the collateral that we provide. To
collateralize the line, we pledge commercial loans that are eligible based on Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago guidelines. At June 30, 2011, we had pledged commercial loans amounting to $434.5
million with a lendable value of $258.6 million. At December 31, 2010, we had pledged commercial
loans amounting to $554.4 million with a lendable value of $300.8 million. At June 30, 2011, we
had no borrowings outstanding against this line of credit.
83
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our exposure to interest rate risk arises from three distinctly managed mechanisms home
lending, mortgage servicing, and structural balance sheet maturity or repricing mismatches.
In our home lending operations, we are exposed to market risk in the form of interest rate
risk from the time we commit to an interest rate on a mortgage loan application through the time we
sell, or commit to sell, the mortgage loan. On a daily basis, we analyze various economic and
market factors to project the amount of mortgage loans we expect to sell for delivery at a future
date. The actual amount of loans sold will be a percentage of the amount of mortgage loans on
which we have issued binding commitments (and thereby locked in the interest rate) but have not yet
closed (pipeline loans) to actual closings. If interest rates change in an unanticipated
fashion, the actual percentage of pipeline loans that close may differ from the projected
percentage. A mismatch of our commitments to fund mortgage loans and our commitments to sell
mortgage loans may have an adverse effect on the results of operations in any such period. For
instance, a sudden increase in interest rates may cause a higher percentage of pipeline loans to
close than we projected, and thereby exceed our commitments to sell that pipeline of loans. As a
result, we could incur losses upon sale of these additional loans to the extent the market rate of
interest is higher than the mortgage interest rate committed to by us on pipeline loans we had
initially anticipated to close. To the extent that the hedging strategies utilized by us are not
successful, our profitability may be adversely affected.
We also service residential first mortgages for various external parties. We receive a
service fee based on the unpaid balances of servicing rights as well as ancillary income (late
fees, float on payments, etc.) as compensation for performing the servicing function. An increase
in mortgage prepayments, as is often associated with declining interest rates, can lead to reduced
values on capitalized mortgage servicing rights and ultimately reduced loan servicing revenues. We
hedge the market risk associated with mortgage servicing rights using a portfolio of U.S. Treasury
note futures and options. To the extent that the hedging strategies are not effective, our
profitability associated with the mortgage servicing activity may be adversely affected.
In addition to the home lending and mortgage servicing operations, our banking operations may
be exposed to market risk due to differences in the timing of the maturity or repricing of assets
versus liabilities, as well as the potential shift in the yield curve. This risk is evaluated and
managed on a company-wide basis using a net portfolio value (NPV) analysis framework. The NPV
analysis is intended to estimate the net sensitivity of the fair value of the assets and
liabilities to sudden and significant changes in the levels of interest rates.
The following table is a summary of the changes in our NPV that are projected to result from
hypothetical changes in market interest rates. NPV is the market value of assets, less the market
value of liabilities, adjusted for the market value of off-balance sheet instruments. The interest
rate scenarios presented in the table include interest rates at June 30, 2011 as adjusted by
instantaneous parallel rate changes upward to 300 basis points and downward to 100 basis points.
The June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 scenarios are not comparable due to differences in the
interest rate environments, including the absolute level of rates and the shape of the yield curve.
Each rate scenario reflects unique prepayment exceptions, the repricing characteristics of
individual instruments or groups of similar instruments, our historical experience, and our asset
and liability management strategy. Further, this analysis assumes that certain instruments would
not be affected by the changes in interest rates or would be partially affected due to the
characteristics of the instruments.
The analysis is based on our interest rate exposure at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010 and
does not contemplate any actions that we might undertake in response to changes in market interest
rates, which could impact NPV. Further, as this framework evaluates risks to the current statement
of financial condition only, changes to the volumes and pricing of new business opportunities that
can be expected in different interest rate outcomes are not incorporated in this analytical
framework.
There are limitations inherent in any methodology used to estimate the exposure to changes in
market interest rates. It is not possible to fully model the market risk in instruments with
leverage, option, or prepayment risks. Also, we are affected by base basis risk, which is the
difference in repricing characteristics of similar term rate indices. As such, this analysis is
not intended to be a precise forecast of the effect a change in market interest rates would have on
us.
While each analysis involves a static model approach to a dynamic operation, the NPV model is
the preferred method. If NPV rises in an up or down interest rate scenario, that would indicate an
up direction for the margin in that hypothetical rate scenario. A perfectly matched balance sheet
would possess no change in the NPV, regardless of the rate scenario.
84
The following table presents the NPV in the stated interest rate scenarios (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Scenario |
|
NPV |
|
|
NPV% |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Scenario |
|
|
NPV |
|
|
NPV% |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
300 |
|
$ |
1,269 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
300 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
200 |
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
100 |
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Current |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Current |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-100 |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
-100 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
The June 30, 2011 risk profile did not change significantly as compared to the risk profile at
December 31, 2010. Our balance sheet is asset sensitive, suggesting that a rising interest rate
environment would have a positive effect on the valuation and on our net interest income. The
positive effect generally arises because the amount of assets that would be expected to re-price
in the near term would exceed the amount of liabilities that could similarly re-price over the same
time period because such liabilities may have longer maturities or re-pricing terms.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. A review and evaluation was performed by our
principal executive and financial officers regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that review and evaluation, the principal
executive and financial officers have concluded that our current disclosure controls and
procedures, as designed and implemented, are operating effectively.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, there has been no
change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the
evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
85
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in response to
Item 1A to Part I of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2010, except the following risk factor that updates and supplements the risk factors in that
report.
Changes in the composition of our assets could increase risk and potential reserves.
We have been increasing, and intend to continue to increase, our origination of commercial and
industrial loans in the future, as well as to otherwise diversify our assets. The credit risk
related to these types of loans and assets could be greater than the risk related to residential
loans (and securities backed by such loans) and commercial real estate loans which comprise the
assets in which we have invested historically. As we intend to continue to diversify our assets,
it may be necessary to increase the level of our allowance for loan losses if there are perceived
to be increased risk characteristics associated with these types of assets. In addition, some loans
that we originate could carry larger balances to single borrowers or related groups of borrowers
than residential loans thereby increasing our concentration risk. Any increase in our allowance
for loan losses would adversely affect our earnings.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Sale of Unregistered Securities
|
|
The Company made no sales of unregistered securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
The Company made no purchases of its equity securities during the quarter ended June 30,
2011. |
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
86
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated May 18, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
Preferability Letter |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
101*
|
|
Financial statements from Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) the Consolidated
Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss, (iv) the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
* |
|
As provided in Rule 406T of the Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed
for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
87
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC.
Registrant
|
|
Date: August 8, 2011 |
/s/ Joseph P. Campanelli
|
|
|
Joseph P. Campanelli |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul D. Borja
|
|
|
Paul D. Borja |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
88
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated May 18, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
Preferability Letter |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
101*
|
|
Financial statements from Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) the Consolidated
Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss, (iv) the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
* |
|
As provided in Rule 406T of the Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed
for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
89