e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010 |
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
for the transition period from to |
Commission file number: 0-49992
TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
82-0543156
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
4211 South 102nd Street, Omaha, Nebraska, 68127
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(402) 331-7856
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months, and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding twelve months. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of January 27, 2011, there were 573,769,164 outstanding shares of the registrants common stock.
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
INDEX
2
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors
TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation (the
Company) as of December 31, 2010, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and
cash flows for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of TD Ameritrade Holding
Corporation as of September 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our
report dated November 19, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2010, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 4, 2011
3
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
893,383 |
|
|
$ |
741,492 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
3,595 |
|
|
|
3,592 |
|
Cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations |
|
|
527,343 |
|
|
|
994,026 |
|
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
944,822 |
|
|
|
1,207,723 |
|
Receivable from clients net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
8,315,435 |
|
|
|
7,391,432 |
|
Receivable from affiliates |
|
|
100,426 |
|
|
|
92,946 |
|
Other receivables net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
67,146 |
|
|
|
68,928 |
|
Securities owned, at fair value |
|
|
198,341 |
|
|
|
217,234 |
|
Property and equipment net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
286,012 |
|
|
|
272,211 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
2,467,013 |
|
|
|
2,467,013 |
|
Acquired intangible assets net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
1,096,887 |
|
|
|
1,124,259 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9,407 |
|
|
|
9,915 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
122,832 |
|
|
|
136,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
15,032,642 |
|
|
$ |
14,726,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
$ |
1,797,810 |
|
|
$ |
1,934,315 |
|
Payable to clients |
|
|
7,011,564 |
|
|
|
6,810,391 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
490,834 |
|
|
|
476,306 |
|
Payable to affiliates |
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
57,029 |
|
|
|
63,512 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,282,817 |
|
|
|
1,302,269 |
|
Capitalized lease obligations |
|
|
18,854 |
|
|
|
20,799 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
350,765 |
|
|
|
344,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
11,013,277 |
|
|
|
10,955,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 100 million shares authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; one billion shares authorized; 631,381,860 shares issued; December 31, 2010 573,634,541 outstanding; September 30, 2010 576,134,924 outstanding |
|
|
6,314 |
|
|
|
6,314 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,558,992 |
|
|
|
1,390,283 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,238,664 |
|
|
|
3,122,305 |
|
Treasury stock, common, at cost December 31, 2010 57,747,319 shares;
September 30, 2010 55,246,936 shares |
|
|
(785,110 |
) |
|
|
(747,271 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
4,019,365 |
|
|
|
3,771,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
15,032,642 |
|
|
$ |
14,726,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction-based revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and transaction fees |
|
$ |
292,696 |
|
|
$ |
309,388 |
|
|
Asset-based revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
|
116,820 |
|
|
|
101,240 |
|
Brokerage interest expense |
|
|
(1,292 |
) |
|
|
(1,827 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
|
115,528 |
|
|
|
99,413 |
|
|
Insured deposit account fees |
|
|
178,471 |
|
|
|
155,331 |
|
Investment product fees |
|
|
40,697 |
|
|
|
29,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-based revenues |
|
|
334,696 |
|
|
|
284,165 |
|
|
Other revenues |
|
|
28,798 |
|
|
|
31,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
656,190 |
|
|
|
624,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
162,406 |
|
|
|
146,639 |
|
Clearing and execution costs |
|
|
23,799 |
|
|
|
21,905 |
|
Communications |
|
|
26,914 |
|
|
|
24,659 |
|
Occupancy and equipment costs |
|
|
35,191 |
|
|
|
34,889 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16,136 |
|
|
|
13,610 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
24,591 |
|
|
|
25,580 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
40,316 |
|
|
|
33,707 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
74,583 |
|
|
|
65,193 |
|
Other |
|
|
18,167 |
|
|
|
18,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
422,103 |
|
|
|
384,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
234,087 |
|
|
|
240,400 |
|
|
Other expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings |
|
|
10,825 |
|
|
|
11,629 |
|
Loss on debt refinancing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
10,825 |
|
|
|
20,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income |
|
|
223,262 |
|
|
|
220,379 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
78,223 |
|
|
|
84,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
145,039 |
|
|
$ |
136,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
575,485 |
|
|
|
587,843 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
581,243 |
|
|
|
595,634 |
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
145,039 |
|
|
$ |
136,237 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16,136 |
|
|
|
13,610 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
24,591 |
|
|
|
25,580 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6,538 |
|
|
|
30,979 |
|
Loss on disposal of property |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
Loss on debt refinancing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,392 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
|
9,181 |
|
Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation |
|
|
(4,634 |
) |
|
|
(5,320 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and investments segregated in compliance
with federal regulations |
|
|
466,683 |
|
|
|
243,012 |
|
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
262,901 |
|
|
|
618,747 |
|
Receivable from clients, net |
|
|
(924,003 |
) |
|
|
(616,750 |
) |
Receivable from/payable to affiliates, net |
|
|
(7,018 |
) |
|
|
5,726 |
|
Other receivables, net |
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
11,682 |
|
Securities owned |
|
|
18,893 |
|
|
|
(251,533 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(6,208 |
) |
|
|
(6,582 |
) |
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
(136,505 |
) |
|
|
(487,454 |
) |
Payable to clients |
|
|
201,173 |
|
|
|
631,217 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
17,968 |
|
|
|
(89,480 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(6,483 |
) |
|
|
8,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
85,229 |
|
|
|
285,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(30,225 |
) |
|
|
(20,797 |
) |
Cash received in sale of business |
|
|
5,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,100 |
) |
Proceeds from sale and maturity of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
Proceeds from redemption of money market funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(24,997 |
) |
|
|
(9,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,248,557 |
|
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,032 |
) |
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,406,500 |
) |
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(1,945 |
) |
|
|
(3,718 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options; Three months ended
December 31, 2010 113,012 shares; 2009 1,599,089 shares |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
5,835 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock; Three months ended
December 31, 2010 121,487 shares; 2009 159,000 shares |
|
|
(2,034 |
) |
|
|
(3,229 |
) |
Return of prepayment on structured stock repurchase |
|
|
118,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of cash dividends |
|
|
(28,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation |
|
|
4,634 |
|
|
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
91,527 |
|
|
|
(163,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
151,891 |
|
|
|
112,680 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
741,492 |
|
|
|
791,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
893,383 |
|
|
$ |
903,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
18,402 |
|
|
$ |
7,701 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
54,003 |
|
|
$ |
100,744 |
|
Tax benefit on exercises and distributions of stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
4,634 |
|
|
$ |
9,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of structured stock repurchase; 3,159,360 shares |
|
$ |
50,366 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TD Ameritrade Holding
Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). Intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated.
These financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and, in the opinion of management, reflect all
adjustments, which are all of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. These financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys annual
report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
2. ACQUIRED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Companys acquired intangible assets consist of the following as of December 31, 2010 (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
Client relationships |
|
$ |
1,229,431 |
|
|
$ |
(359,273 |
) |
|
$ |
870,158 |
|
Technology and content |
|
|
99,161 |
|
|
|
(22,813 |
) |
|
|
76,348 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
10,100 |
|
|
|
(8,028 |
) |
|
|
2,072 |
|
Non-competition agreement |
|
|
5,486 |
|
|
|
(2,851 |
) |
|
|
2,635 |
|
Trademark license |
|
|
145,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,489,852 |
|
|
$ |
(392,965 |
) |
|
$ |
1,096,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated future amortization expense for acquired intangible assets outstanding as of
December 31, 2010 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Expense |
|
2011 Remaining |
|
$ |
71,580 |
|
2012 |
|
|
92,370 |
|
2013 |
|
|
91,102 |
|
2014 |
|
|
90,641 |
|
2015 |
|
|
89,839 |
|
2016 |
|
|
85,544 |
|
Thereafter (to 2025) |
|
|
430,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
951,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
8
3. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Companys cash and cash equivalents is summarized in the following table (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Corporate |
|
$ |
340,845 |
|
|
$ |
234,993 |
|
Broker-dealer subsidiaries |
|
|
459,728 |
|
|
|
426,618 |
|
Trust company subsidiary |
|
|
60,632 |
|
|
|
50,937 |
|
Investment advisory subsidiaries |
|
|
32,178 |
|
|
|
28,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
893,383 |
|
|
$ |
741,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital requirements may limit the amount of cash available for dividend from the
broker-dealer and trust company subsidiaries to the parent company. Cash and cash equivalents of
the investment advisory subsidiaries is generally not available for corporate purposes.
4. INCOME TAXES
The Companys effective income tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2010 was 35.0%,
compared to 38.2% for the three months December 31, 2009. The provision for income taxes for the
three months ended December 31, 2010 was unusually low due to $4.9 million of favorable resolutions
of state income tax matters and $1.4 million of favorable deferred income tax adjustments resulting
from recent state income tax law changes. These items favorably impacted the Companys earnings for
the three months ended December 31, 2010 by approximately $0.01 per share.
5. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Value |
|
|
Discount |
|
|
Adjustment(1) |
|
|
Value |
|
Senior Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.950% Senior Notes due 2012 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
|
$ |
6,093 |
|
|
$ |
255,929 |
|
4.150% Senior Notes due 2014 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
23,627 |
|
|
|
523,240 |
|
5.600% Senior Notes due 2019 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
499,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Senior Notes |
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
|
|
29,720 |
|
|
|
1,278,555 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,254,262 |
|
|
$ |
(1,165 |
) |
|
$ |
29,720 |
|
|
$ |
1,282,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Value |
|
|
Discount |
|
|
Adjustment(1) |
|
|
Value |
|
Senior Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.950% Senior Notes due 2012 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
|
$ |
9,299 |
|
|
$ |
259,114 |
|
4.150% Senior Notes due 2014 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
39,936 |
|
|
|
539,525 |
|
5.600% Senior Notes due 2019 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
(632 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
499,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Senior Notes |
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
(1,228 |
) |
|
|
49,235 |
|
|
|
1,298,007 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,254,262 |
|
|
$ |
(1,228 |
) |
|
$ |
49,235 |
|
|
$ |
1,302,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fair value adjustments relate to changes in the fair value of the debt while in a fair
value hedging relationship. See Interest Rate Swaps below. |
Interest Rate Swaps The Company is exposed to changes in the fair value of its fixed-rate
Senior Notes resulting from interest rate fluctuations. To hedge this exposure, on December 30,
2009, the Company entered into fixed-for-variable interest rate swaps on the 2.950% Senior Notes
due December 1, 2012 (the 2012 Notes) and the 4.150% Senior Notes due December 1, 2014 (the 2014
Notes) for notional amounts of $250 million and $500 million, respectively, with maturity dates
matching
9
the respective maturity dates of the 2012 Notes and 2014 Notes. In addition, on January 7, 2011,
the Company entered into a fixed-for-variable interest rate swap on the 5.600% Senior Notes due
December 1, 2019 (the 2019 Notes) for a notional amount of $500 million, with a maturity date
matching the maturity date of the 2019 Notes. The interest rate swaps effectively change the
fixed-rate interest on the Senior Notes to variable-rate interest. Under the terms of the interest
rate swap agreements, the Company receives semi-annual fixed-rate interest payments based on the
same rates applicable to the Senior Notes, and makes quarterly variable-rate interest payments
based on three-month LIBOR plus (a) 0.9693% for the swap on the 2012 Notes, (b) 1.245% for the swap
on the 2014 Notes and (c) 2.3745% for the swap on the 2019 Notes.
The interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges and qualify for the shortcut method
of accounting. Changes in the payment of interest resulting from the interest rate swaps are
recorded as an offset to interest on borrowings on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps are completely offset by changes in fair value of
the related notes, resulting in no effect on net income. For the three months ended December 31,
2010, the Company recorded a $19.5 million loss for the change in fair value of the interest rate
swaps on the 2012 Notes and 2014 Notes and an offsetting $19.5 million fair value gain on the
hedged fixed-rate debt. The offsetting fair value gains and losses were recorded in interest on
borrowings on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
The following table summarizes the fair value of outstanding derivatives designated as hedging
instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
Derivatives recorded under the caption Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap assets |
|
$ |
29,720 |
|
|
$ |
49,235 |
|
The interest rate swaps are subject to counterparty credit risk. Credit risk is managed by
limiting activity to approved counterparties that meet a minimum credit rating threshold and by
entering into credit support agreements. The bilateral credit support agreements related to the
interest rate swaps require daily collateral coverage, in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury
securities, for the aggregate fair value of the interest rate swaps. As of December 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2010, the interest rate swap counterparty for the 2012 Notes and 2014 Notes had
pledged $31.2 million and $52.9 million of collateral, respectively, to the Company in the form of
U.S. Treasury securities.
6. CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the SEC Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule
15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), which requires the maintenance of minimum net
capital, as defined. Net capital is calculated for each broker-dealer subsidiary individually.
Excess net capital of one broker-dealer subsidiary may not be used to offset a net capital
deficiency of another broker-dealer subsidiary. Net capital and the related net capital
requirement may fluctuate on a daily basis.
Net capital and net capital requirements for the Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries are
summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
Required |
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
Net Capital |
|
|
Required |
|
|
Net Capital |
|
TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc. |
|
$ |
1,190,298 |
|
|
$ |
188,917 |
|
|
$ |
1,001,381 |
|
|
$ |
1,092,692 |
|
|
$ |
177,644 |
|
|
$ |
915,048 |
|
TD Ameritrade, Inc. |
|
|
223,410 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
222,410 |
|
|
|
142,859 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
141,859 |
|
Bellevue Chicago, LLC |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
39,039 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
38,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,413,708 |
|
|
$ |
189,917 |
|
|
$ |
1,223,791 |
|
|
$ |
1,274,590 |
|
|
$ |
178,894 |
|
|
$ |
1,095,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc. (TDAC) is a clearing broker-dealer and TD Ameritrade, Inc. is
an introducing broker-dealer. Prior to October 12, 2010, Bellevue Chicago, LLC (formerly
thinkorswim, Inc.) was registered as an introducing broker-dealer. On May 25, 2010, Bellevue
Chicago, LLC transferred its introducing broker-dealer business to TD Ameritrade, Inc. On October
12, 2010, the Company withdrew Bellevue Chicago, LLCs registration as a broker-dealer.
The Companys non-depository trust company subsidiary, TD Ameritrade Trust Company (TDATC), is
subject to capital requirements established by the State of Maine, which requires TDATC to maintain
minimum Tier 1 capital, as defined.
10
TDATCs Tier 1 capital was $22.0 million and $22.3 million as of December 31, 2010 and September
30, 2010, respectively, which exceeded the required Tier 1 capital by $12.0 million and $12.3
million, respectively.
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Spam Litigation A purported class action, captioned Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc., was filed on
May 31, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
complaint alleges that there was a breach in TD Ameritrade, Inc.s systems, which allowed access to
e-mail addresses and other personal information of account holders, and that as a result account
holders received unsolicited e-mail from spammers promoting certain stocks and have been subjected
to an increased risk of identity theft. The complaint requests unspecified damages and injunctive
and other equitable relief. A second lawsuit, captioned Zigler v. TD Ameritrade, Inc., was filed
on September 26, 2007, in the same jurisdiction on behalf of a purported nationwide class of
account holders. The factual allegations of the complaint and the relief sought are substantially
the same as those in the first lawsuit. The cases were consolidated under the caption In re TD
Ameritrade Accountholders Litigation. The Company hired an independent consultant to investigate
whether identity theft occurred as a result of the breach. The consultant conducted four
investigations from August 2007 to June 2008 and reported that it found no evidence of identity
theft. On December 20, 2010, TD Ameritrade, Inc. received preliminary Court approval of a proposed
class settlement agreement between TD Ameritrade, Inc. and plaintiffs Richard Holober and Brad
Zigler. Under the proposed settlement, the Company will pay no less than $2.5 million in settlement
benefits. Total compensation to be paid to all eligible members of the settlement class will not
exceed $6.5 million, inclusive of any award of attorneys fees and costs. In addition, the
settlement agreement provides that the Company will retain an independent information technology
security consultant to assess whether the Company has met certain information technology security
standards. The proposed settlement is subject to final approval by the Court. A hearing on final
approval of the proposed settlement is scheduled for April 7, 2011.
Reserve Fund Matters During September 2008, The Reserve, an independent mutual fund company,
announced that the net asset value of the Reserve Yield Plus Fund declined below $1.00 per share.
The Yield Plus Fund is not a money market mutual fund, but its stated objective was to maintain a
net asset value of $1.00 per share. TD Ameritrade, Inc.s clients hold shares in the Yield Plus
Fund, which is being liquidated by The Reserve.
On July 23, 2010, The Reserve announced that through that date it had distributed approximately
94.8% of the Yield Plus Fund assets as of September 15, 2008 and that the Yield Plus Fund had
approximately $39.7 million in total remaining assets. The Reserve stated that the funds Board of
Trustees has set aside almost the entire amount of the remaining assets to cover potential claims,
fees and expenses. The Company estimates that TD Ameritrade, Inc. clients current positions held
in the Reserve Yield Plus Fund amount to approximately 79% of the fund, which, if valued based on a
$1.00 per share net asset value, would total approximately $47.3 million.
TD Ameritrade, Inc. has received subpoenas and other requests for documents and information from
the SEC and other regulatory authorities regarding TD Ameritrade, Inc.s offering of the Yield Plus
Fund to clients. TD Ameritrade, Inc. is cooperating with the investigations and requests. On
January 27, 2011, TD Ameritrade, Inc. entered into a settlement with the SEC, agreeing to the entry of an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant
to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial
Sanctions (Order). In the Order, the SEC finds that TD Ameritrade, Inc. failed reasonably to
supervise its registered representatives with a view to preventing their violations of Section
17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with their offer and sale of the Yield Plus
Fund. TD Ameritrade, Inc. did not admit or deny any of the findings in the Order, and no fine was
imposed.
Under the settlement agreement, TD Ameritrade, Inc. agreed to pay $0.012 per share to
all eligible current or former clients that purchased shares of the Yield Plus Fund and continue to
own those shares. Clients that purchased Yield Plus Fund shares through independent registered
investment advisors are not eligible for the payment. The Company estimates that payments
to clients under the settlement will total approximately $10 million. The Company had approximately $10 million accrued for this matter as of December 31, 2010.
The Pennsylvania Securities Commission has filed an administrative order against TD Ameritrade,
Inc. involving the sale of Yield Plus Fund securities to 21 Pennsylvania clients. An
administrative hearing will be held to determine whether there have been violations of certain
provisions of the Pennsylvania Securities Act of 1972 and rules thereunder and to determine what,
if any, administrative sanctions should be imposed. TD Ameritrade, Inc. is defending the action.
In November 2008, a purported class action lawsuit was filed with respect to the Yield Plus Fund.
The lawsuit is captioned Ross v. Reserve Management Company, Inc. et al. and is pending in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Ross lawsuit is on behalf of persons who
purchased shares of Reserve Yield Plus Fund. On November 20, 2009,
11
the plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint naming as defendants the funds advisor, certain of
its affiliates and the Company and certain of its directors, officers and shareholders as alleged
control persons. The complaint alleges claims of violations of the federal securities laws and
other claims based on allegations that false and misleading statements and omissions were made in
the Reserve Yield Plus Fund prospectuses and in other statements regarding the fund. The complaint
seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory damages including interest, attorneys fees,
rescission, exemplary damages and equitable relief. On January 19, 2010, the defendants submitted
motions to dismiss the complaint. The motions are pending.
The Company is unable to predict the outcome or the timing of the ultimate resolution of the
Pennsylvania action and the Ross lawsuit, or the potential loss, if any, that may result from these
unresolved matters. However, management believes the outcome of these pending proceedings is not
likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows of the Company.
Other Legal and Regulatory Matters The Company is subject to other lawsuits, arbitrations,
claims and other legal proceedings in connection with its business. Some of these legal actions
include claims for substantial or unspecified compensatory and/or punitive damages. A substantial
adverse judgment or other unfavorable resolution of these matters could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations and cash flows or could cause
the Company significant reputational harm. Management believes the Company has adequate legal
defenses with respect to these legal proceedings to which it is a defendant or respondent and the
outcome of these pending proceedings is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. However, the Company is
unable to predict the outcome or the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters, or the
potential losses, if any, that may result from these matters.
In the normal course of business, the Company discusses matters with its regulators raised during
regulatory examinations or otherwise subject to their inquiry. These matters could result in
censures, fines, penalties or other sanctions. Management believes the outcome of any resulting
actions will not be material to the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows. However, the Company is unable to predict the outcome or the timing of the ultimate
resolution of these matters, or the potential fines, penalties or injunctive or other equitable
relief, if any, that may result from these matters.
Income Taxes The Companys federal and state income tax returns are subject to examination by
taxing authorities. Because the application of tax laws and regulations to many types of
transactions is subject to varying interpretations, amounts reported in the condensed consolidated
financial statements could be significantly changed at a later date upon final determinations by
taxing authorities. The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) has agreed to indemnify the Company for tax
obligations, if any, pertaining to activities of TD Waterhouse Group, Inc. (TD Waterhouse) prior
to the Companys acquisition of TD Waterhouse in January 2006.
General Contingencies In the ordinary course of business, there are various contingencies that
are not reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements. These include the Companys
broker-dealer subsidiaries client activities involving the execution, settlement and financing of
various client securities transactions. These activities may expose the Company to credit risk in
the event the clients are unable to fulfill their contractual obligations.
Client securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin
transactions, the Company extends credit to the client, subject to various regulatory and internal
margin requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in the clients account. In connection
with these activities, the Company also executes and clears client transactions involving the sale
of securities not yet purchased (short sales). Such margin-related transactions may expose the
Company to credit risk in the event a clients assets are not sufficient to fully cover losses that
the client may incur. In the event the client fails to satisfy its obligations, the Company has
the authority to purchase or sell financial instruments in the clients account at prevailing
market prices in order to fulfill the clients obligations. The Company seeks to mitigate the
risks associated with its client securities activities by requiring clients to maintain margin
collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal guidelines. The Company monitors
required margin levels throughout each trading day and, pursuant to such guidelines, requires
clients to deposit additional collateral, or to reduce positions, when necessary.
The Company loans securities temporarily to other broker-dealers in connection with its
broker-dealer business. The Company receives cash as collateral for the securities loaned.
Increases in securities prices may cause the market value of the securities loaned to exceed the
amount of cash received as collateral. In the event the counterparty to these transactions does
not return the loaned securities, the Company may be exposed to the risk of acquiring the
securities at prevailing market prices in order to satisfy its client obligations. The Company
mitigates this risk by requiring credit approvals for counterparties, by monitoring the market
value of securities loaned on a daily basis and requiring additional cash as collateral when
necessary, and by participating in a risk-sharing program offered through the Options Clearing
Corporation (OCC).
12
The Company borrows securities temporarily from other broker-dealers in connection with its
broker-dealer business. The Company deposits cash as collateral for the securities borrowed.
Decreases in securities prices may cause the market value of the securities borrowed to fall below
the amount of cash deposited as collateral. In the event the counterparty to these transactions
does not return the cash deposited, the Company may be exposed to the risk of selling the
securities at prevailing market prices. The Company mitigates this risk by requiring credit
approvals for counterparties, by monitoring the collateral values on a daily basis and requiring
collateral to be returned by the counterparties when necessary, and by participating in a
risk-sharing program offered through the OCC.
The Company transacts in reverse repurchase agreements in connection with its broker-dealer
business. The Companys policy is to take possession or control of securities with a market value
in excess of the principal amount loaned, plus accrued interest, in order to collateralize resale
agreements. The Company monitors the market value of the underlying securities that collateralize
the related receivable on resale agreements on a daily basis and may require additional collateral
when deemed appropriate.
As of December 31, 2010, client excess margin securities of approximately $11.5 billion and stock
borrowings of approximately $0.7 billion were available to the Company to utilize as
collateral on various borrowings or for other purposes. The Company had loaned approximately $1.8
billion and repledged approximately $1.2 billion of that collateral as of December 31, 2010.
Guarantees The Company is a member of and provides guarantees to securities clearinghouses and
exchanges. Under related agreements, the Company is generally required to guarantee the
performance of other members. Under these agreements, if a member becomes unable to satisfy its
obligations to the clearinghouse, other members would be required to meet shortfalls. The
Companys liability under these arrangements is not quantifiable and could exceed the cash and
securities it has posted to the clearinghouse as collateral. However, the potential for the
Company to be required to make payments under these agreements is considered remote. Accordingly,
no contingent liability is carried on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for these
guarantees.
See Insured Deposit Account Agreement in Note 12 for a description of a guarantee included in
that agreement.
Employment Agreements The Company has entered into employment agreements with several of its key
executive officers. These employment agreements generally provide for annual base salary and
incentive compensation, stock award acceleration and severance payments in the event of termination
of employment under certain defined circumstances or changes in control of the Company. Incentive
compensation amounts are based on the Companys financial performance and other factors.
8. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines
fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an
exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches, including market, income
and/or cost approaches. ASC 820-10 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value
that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by
requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs reflect the
assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, developed based on
market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the
Companys own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability, developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value
into three broad levels, as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. This category includes active
exchange-traded funds, mutual funds and equity securities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Such inputs include quoted prices
in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by
correlation or other means. This category includes most debt securities and other
interest-sensitive financial instruments. |
13
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, where there is little, if
any, observable market activity or data for the asset or liability. This category includes
assets and liabilities related to money market and other mutual funds managed by The
Reserve for which the net asset value has declined below $1.00 per share and the funds are
being liquidated. This category also includes auction rate securities for which the
periodic auctions have failed. |
The following tables present the Companys fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured
on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,496 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,496 |
|
U.S. government agency debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,523 |
|
|
|
194,523 |
|
Money market and other mutual funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
Municipal debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
542 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Securities owned |
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
195,493 |
|
|
|
198,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
864 |
|
|
$ |
35,299 |
|
|
$ |
195,493 |
|
|
$ |
231,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold, not yet purchased: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
14,042 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,060 |
|
Municipal debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities sold, not yet purchased (2) |
|
$ |
14,042 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount is included in other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. See
Interest Rate Swaps in Note 5 for details. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. |
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,494 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,494 |
|
U.S. government agency debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,288 |
|
|
|
209,288 |
|
Money market and other mutual funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,404 |
|
|
|
5,404 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463 |
|
Municipal debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Securities owned |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
|
214,692 |
|
|
|
217,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
54,916 |
|
|
$ |
214,692 |
|
|
$ |
270,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold, not yet purchased: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
2,213 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,227 |
|
Municipal debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities sold, not yet purchased (2) |
|
$ |
2,213 |
|
|
$ |
928 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount is included in other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. See
Interest Rate Swaps in Note 5 for details. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. |
There were no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the periods
presented in the tables below. The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and
liabilities measured on a recurring basis for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gains |
|
|
Sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Issuances and |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Earnings(1) |
|
|
Settlements, Net |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
$ |
209,288 |
|
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
$ |
(15,144 |
) |
|
$ |
194,523 |
|
Money market and other mutual funds |
|
|
5,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,434 |
) |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities owned |
|
$ |
214,692 |
|
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
$ |
(19,578 |
) |
|
$ |
195,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net gains on auction rate securities are recorded in other revenues on the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income and do not relate to assets held as of December 31, 2010. |
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gains |
|
|
Sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Issuances and |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Earnings(1) |
|
|
Settlements, Net |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market mutual funds |
|
$ |
50,971 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11,594 |
) |
|
$ |
39,377 |
|
Securities owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
14,579 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
251,707 |
|
|
|
266,657 |
|
Money market and other mutual funds |
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
4,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Securities owned |
|
|
19,628 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
251,265 |
|
|
|
271,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
70,599 |
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
$ |
239,671 |
|
|
$ |
310,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net gains on auction rate securities are recorded in other revenues on the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income and do not relate to assets held as of December 31, 2009. |
There were no nonfinancial assets or liabilities measured at fair value during the three
months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Valuation Techniques
In general, and where applicable, the Company uses quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities to determine fair value. This pricing methodology applies to the Companys
Level 1 assets and liabilities. If quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and
liabilities are not available to determine fair value, then the Company uses quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities or inputs other than the quoted prices that are observable, either
directly or indirectly. This pricing methodology applies to the Companys Level 2 assets and
liabilities.
Level 2 Measurements:
Debt Securities The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or
similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit
spreads.
Interest Rate Swaps These derivatives are valued using a model that incorporates interest rate
yield curves, which are observable for substantially the full term of the contract. The valuation
model is widely accepted in the financial services industry and does not involve significant
judgment.
Level 3 Measurements:
Money Market and Other Mutual Funds The fair value of positions in money market and other mutual
funds managed by The Reserve is estimated by management based on the underlying portfolio holdings
data published by The Reserve.
Auction Rate Securities (ARS) ARS are long-term variable rate securities tied to short-term
interest rates that are reset through a Dutch auction process, which generally occurs every seven
to 35 days. Holders of ARS were previously able to liquidate their holdings to prospective buyers
by participating in the auctions. During fiscal 2008, the Dutch auction process failed and holders
were no longer able to liquidate their holdings through the auction process. The fair value of
Company ARS holdings is estimated based on an internal pricing model. The pricing model takes into
consideration the characteristics of the underlying securities as well as multiple inputs,
including counterparty credit quality, expected timing of redemptions and an estimated yield
premium that a market participant would require over otherwise comparable securities to compensate
for the illiquidity of the ARS. These inputs require significant management judgment.
Fair Value of Senior Notes
As of December 31, 2010, the Companys Senior Notes had an aggregate estimated fair value, based on
quoted market prices, of approximately $1.30 billion, compared to the aggregate carrying value of
the Senior Notes on the Condensed Consolidated
16
Balance Sheet of $1.28 billion. As of September 30, 2010, the Companys Senior Notes had an
aggregate estimated fair value, based on quoted market prices, of approximately $1.34 billion,
compared to the aggregate carrying value of the Senior Notes on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet of $1.30 billion.
9. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic
and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
145,039 |
|
|
$ |
136,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
575,485 |
|
|
|
587,843 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock equivalent shares related to stock-based compensation |
|
|
5,758 |
|
|
|
7,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
581,243 |
|
|
|
595,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
10. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
145,039 |
|
|
$ |
136,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
145,170 |
|
|
$ |
136,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. STRUCTURED STOCK REPURCHASE
On August 20, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with an investment bank counterparty to
effect a structured repurchase of up to 12 million shares of its common stock. The Company entered
into this structured stock repurchase agreement in order to lower the average cost of acquiring
shares of its common stock. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company prepaid $169.2 million
to the counterparty, which was recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Settlement of the transaction occurred on December 1, 2010
and the Company purchased approximately 3.2 million shares for approximately $50.4 million ($15.94
per share). The number of shares the Company purchased from the counterparty and the purchase
price were based on the average of the daily volume-weighted average share price of the Companys
common stock over the measurement period for the transaction, less a pre-determined discount. Upon
settlement of the transaction, the excess prepayment amount of $118.8 million was returned to the
Company in cash and was recorded as additional paid-in capital.
12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with TD and Affiliates
As a result of the acquisition of TD Waterhouse during fiscal 2006, TD became an affiliate of the
Company. TD owned approximately 46.1% of the Companys common stock as of December 31, 2010, of
which 45% is permitted to be voted under the terms of the Stockholders Agreement among TD, the
Company and certain other stockholders. Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, TD has the right
to designate five of twelve members of the Companys board of directors. The Company transacts
business and has extensive relationships with TD and certain of its affiliates. A description of
significant transactions with TD and its affiliates is set forth below.
17
Insured Deposit Account Agreement
The Company is party to an insured deposit account (IDA) agreement with TD Bank USA, N.A. (TD
Bank USA), TD Bank, N.A. and TD. Under the IDA agreement, TD Bank USA and TD Bank, N.A.
(together, the Depository Institutions) make available to clients of the Company FDIC-insured
money market deposit accounts as either designated sweep vehicles or as non-sweep deposit accounts.
The Company provides marketing, recordkeeping and support services for the Depository Institutions
with respect to the money market deposit accounts. In exchange for providing these services, the
Depository Institutions pay the Company a fee based on the yield earned on the client IDA assets,
less the actual interest paid to clients, a flat fee to the Depository Institutions of 25 basis
points and the cost of FDIC insurance premiums.
The IDA agreement has a term of five years beginning July 1, 2008, and is automatically renewable
for successive five-year terms, provided that it may be terminated by any party upon two years
prior written notice. The agreement provides that the fee earned on the IDA agreement is
calculated based on three primary components: (a) the actual yield earned on investments in place
as of July 1, 2008, which were primarily fixed-income securities backed by Canadian government
guarantees, (b) the yield on other fixed-rate investments, based on prevailing fixed rates for
identical balances and maturities in the interest rate swap market (generally LIBOR-based) at the
time such investments were added to the IDA portfolio and (c) floating-rate investments, based on
the monthly average rate for 30-day LIBOR. The agreement provides that, from time to time, the
Company may request amounts and maturity dates for the other fixed-rate investments (component (b)
above) in the IDA portfolio, subject to the approval of the Depository Institutions. For the month
of December 2010, the IDA portfolio was comprised of approximately 5% component (a) investments,
87% component (b) investments and 8% component (c) investments.
In the event the fee computation results in a negative amount, the Company must pay the Depository
Institutions the negative amount. This effectively results in the Company guaranteeing the
Depository Institutions revenue of 25 basis points on the IDA agreement, plus the reimbursement of
FDIC insurance premiums. The fee computation under the IDA agreement is affected by many
variables, including the type, duration, credit quality, principal balance and yield of the
investment portfolio at the Depository Institutions, the prevailing interest rate environment, the
amount of client deposits and the yield paid on client deposits. Because a negative IDA fee
computation would arise only if there were extraordinary movements in many of these variables, the
maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under this
arrangement cannot be reasonably estimated. Management believes the potential for the fee
calculation to result in a negative amount is remote and the fair value of the guarantee is not
material. Accordingly, no contingent liability is carried on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets for the IDA agreement.
The Company earned fee income associated with the insured deposit account agreement of $178.5
million and $155.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
which is reported as insured deposit account fees on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Mutual Fund Agreements
The Company and an affiliate of TD are parties to a sweep fund agreement, transfer agency
agreement, shareholder services agreement and a dealer agreement pursuant to which certain mutual
funds are made available as money market sweep or direct purchase options to Company clients. The
Company performs certain distribution and marketing support services with respect to those funds.
In consideration for offering the funds and performing the distribution and marketing support
services, an affiliate of TD compensates the Company in accordance with the provisions of the sweep
fund agreement. The Company also performs certain services for the applicable fund and earns fees
for those services. The agreement may be terminated by any party upon one years prior written
notice and may be terminated by the Company upon 30 days prior written notice under certain
circumstances. The Company earned fee income associated with these agreements of $3.6 million and
$2.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which is included
in investment product fees on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Securities Borrowing and Lending
In connection with its brokerage business, the Company engages in securities borrowing and lending
with TD Securities, Inc. (TDSI), an affiliate of TD. Receivable from brokers, dealers and
clearing organizations includes $0.6 million and $1.2 million of receivables from TDSI as of
December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing
organizations includes $86.5 million and $40.8 million of payables to TDSI as of December 31, 2010
and September 30, 2010, respectively. The Company earned net interest revenue of $0.9 million and
$0.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, associated with
securities borrowing and lending with TDSI. The transactions with TDSI are subject to the same
collateral requirements as transactions with other counterparties.
18
Referral and Strategic Alliance Agreement
TD Ameritrade, Inc. is a party to a referral and strategic alliance agreement with TD Bank, N.A.
and TD Wealth Management Services, Inc. (TDWMS). The strategic alliance agreement has a term of
five years beginning February 1, 2010 and is automatically renewable for successive three-year
terms, provided that it may be terminated by any party after January 1, 2011 upon 180 days prior
written notice. Under the agreement, TD Bank, N.A. will promote TD Ameritrade, Inc.s brokerage
services to its clients using a variety of marketing and referral programs and TDWMS referred its
existing brokerage account clients to TD Ameritrade, Inc. while TDWMS discontinued its brokerage
operations. TD Bank, N.A. clients that open brokerage accounts at TD Ameritrade, Inc. and TDWMS
clients that elected to transfer their accounts to TD Ameritrade, Inc. are considered program
clients. TD Ameritrade, Inc. retains a fee for providing brokerage services to the program
clients, and the programs net margin is shared equally between TD Ameritrade, Inc. and TD Bank,
N.A. The Company earned pre-tax income associated with the referral and strategic alliance
agreement of $0.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010.
Cash Management Services Agreement
Pursuant to a cash management services agreement, TD Bank USA provides cash management services to
clients of TD Ameritrade, Inc. In exchange for such services, the Company pays TD Bank USA
service-based fees agreed upon by the parties. The Company incurred expense associated with the
cash management services agreement of $0.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and
2009, which is included in clearing and execution costs on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income. The cash management services agreement will continue in effect for as long as the IDA
agreement remains in effect, provided that it may be terminated by TD Ameritrade, Inc. without
cause upon 60 days prior written notice to TD Bank USA.
Indemnification Agreement for Phantom Stock Plan Liabilities
Pursuant to an indemnification agreement, the Company agreed to assume TD Waterhouse liabilities
related to the payout of awards under The Toronto-Dominion Bank 2002 Phantom Stock Incentive Plan
following the completion of the TD Waterhouse acquisition. Under this plan, participants were
granted units of stock appreciation rights (SARs) based on TDs common stock that generally vest
over four years. Upon exercise, the participant receives cash representing the appreciated value
of the units between the grant date and the redemption date. In connection with the payout of
awards under the 2002 Phantom Stock Incentive Plan, TD agreed to indemnify the Company for any
liabilities incurred by the Company in excess of the provision for such liability included on the
closing date balance sheet of TD Waterhouse. In addition, in the event that the liability incurred
by the Company in connection with the 2002 Phantom Stock Incentive Plan is less than the provision
for such liability included on the closing date balance sheet of TD Waterhouse, the Company agreed
to pay the difference to TD. There were 8,600 and 23,930 SARs outstanding as of December 31, 2010
and September 30, 2010, respectively, with an approximate value of 0.5 million and $1.1 million,
respectively. The indemnification agreement effectively protects the Company against fluctuations
in TDs common stock price with respect to the SARs, so there is no net effect on the Companys
results of operations resulting from such fluctuations.
Canadian Call Center Services Agreement
Pursuant to the Canadian call center services agreement, TD receives and services client calls at
its London, Ontario site for clients of TD Ameritrade, Inc. After May 1, 2013, either party may
terminate this agreement without cause and without penalty by providing 24 months prior written
notice. In consideration of the performance by TD of the call center services, the Company pays
TD, on a monthly basis, an amount approximately equal to TDs monthly cost. The Company incurred
expenses associated with the Canadian call center services agreement of $4.3 million for the three
months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, which is included in professional services expense on the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
TD Waterhouse Canada Order Routing Agreement
TDAC is a party to an order routing agreement with TD Waterhouse Canada Inc. (TDW Canada), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of TD. The agreement has a term of four years beginning May 20, 2010,
provided that it may be terminated by either party upon 90 days prior written notice. Under the
agreement, TDAC provides TDW Canada order routing services for U.S. equity and option orders to
U.S. brokers and market centers with which TDW Canada has order execution arrangements. TDAC
retains a percentage of the net payment for order flow revenue it receives on TDW Canada trades and
remits the remainder to TDW Canada. The Company earned net payment for order flow revenue
associated with the order routing
19
agreement of $0.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010, which is included in other
revenues on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
TD Waterhouse UK Servicing Agreement
TDAC is a party to a servicing agreement with TD Waterhouse Investor Services (Europe) Limited
(TDW UK). The agreement has an initial term of ten years beginning July 16, 2010 and will
automatically renew for consecutive two year terms, provided that either party may give written
notice of its intent not to renew at least 180 days prior to the end of the initial term or any
renewal term. Under the agreement, TDAC provides clearing services to clients of TDW UK that trade
in U.S. equity securities. In exchange for such services, TDW UK pays TDAC a per trade commission.
The Company earned commission revenues associated with the servicing agreement of $0.1 million for
the three months ended December 31, 2010, which is included in commissions and transaction fees on
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Certificates of Deposit Brokerage Agreement
TD Ameritrade, Inc. is party to a certificates of deposit brokerage agreement with TD Bank USA,
under which TD Ameritrade, Inc. acts as agent for its clients in purchasing certificates of deposit
from TD Bank USA. Under the agreement, TD Bank USA pays TD Ameritrade, Inc. a placement fee for
each certificate of deposit issued in an amount agreed to by both parties. TD Ameritrade, Inc. has
periodically promoted limited time offers to purchase a three-month TD Bank USA certificate of
deposit with a premium yield to clients that made a deposit or transferred $25,000 into their TD
Ameritrade, Inc. brokerage account during a specified time period. Under these promotions, TD
Ameritrade, Inc. reimburses TD Bank USA for the subsidized portion of the premium yield paid to its
clients. The Company incurred net costs to TD Bank USA associated with these promotional offers of
$1.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, which is included in
advertising expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Trading Platform Hosting and Services Agreement
On June 11, 2009, immediately following the closing of the Companys acquisition of thinkorswim
Group Inc. (thinkorswim), the Company completed the sale of thinkorswim Canada, Inc.
(thinkorswim Canada) to TDW Canada. In connection with the sale of thinkorswim Canada, the
Company and TDW Canada entered into a trading platform hosting and services agreement. The
agreement has an initial term of five years beginning June 11, 2009, and will automatically renew
for additional periods of two years, unless either party provides notice of non-renewal to the
other party at least 90 days prior to the end of the then-current term. Because this agreement
represents contingent consideration to be paid for the sale of thinkorswim Canada, the Company
recorded a $10.7 million receivable for the fair value of this agreement. Under this agreement,
TDW Canada uses the thinkorswim trading platform and TD Ameritrade, Inc. provides the services to
support the platform. In consideration for the performance by TD Ameritrade, Inc. of all its
obligations under this agreement, TDW Canada pays TD Ameritrade, Inc., on a monthly basis, a fee
based on average client trades per day and transactional revenues. Fees earned under the agreement
are recorded as a reduction of the contingent consideration receivable until the receivable is
reduced to zero, and thereafter will be recorded as fee revenue. As of December 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2010, $9.6 million and $9.7 million, respectively, of contingent consideration is
included in receivable from affiliates on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Other Related Party Transactions
TD Options LLC, a subsidiary of TD, paid the Company the amount of exchange-sponsored payment for
order flow that it received for routing TD Ameritrade, Inc. client orders to the exchanges. The
Company earned $0.5 million of payment for order flow revenues from TD Options LLC for the three
months ended December 31, 2009, which is included in commissions and transaction fees on the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
TD Securities (USA) LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of TD, was the joint lead manager and
participated as an underwriter in the Companys offering of $1.25 billion of Senior Notes in
November 2009. In this capacity, TD Securities (USA) LLC earned a discount and commission of $0.5
million. This amount is being accounted for as part of the debt issuance costs included in other
assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and is being amortized to interest expense over
the terms of the respective Senior Notes.
Except as otherwise indicated, receivables from and payables to TD and affiliates of TD resulting
from the related party transactions described above are included in receivable from affiliates and
payable to affiliates, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Receivables
from and payables to TD affiliates resulting from client cash sweep activity are
20
generally settled in cash the next business day. Other receivables from and payables to
affiliates of TD are generally settled in cash on a monthly basis.
13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The Senior Notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed by TD
Ameritrade Online Holdings Corp. (TDAOH), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Presented
below is condensed consolidating financial information for the Company, its guarantor subsidiary
and its non-guarantor subsidiaries for the periods indicated.
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
125,602 |
|
|
$ |
29,943 |
|
|
$ |
737,838 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
893,383 |
|
Cash and investments segregated in
compliance with federal regulations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527,343 |
|
Receivable from brokers, dealers and
clearing organizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
944,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
944,822 |
|
Receivable from clients, net of allowance
for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,315,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,315,435 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
5,349,383 |
|
|
|
4,899,983 |
|
|
|
552,128 |
|
|
|
(10,801,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Receivable from affiliates |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
213,975 |
|
|
|
109,711 |
|
|
|
(224,103 |
) |
|
|
100,426 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,467,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,467,013 |
|
Acquired intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,674 |
|
|
|
951,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,096,887 |
|
Other |
|
|
66,971 |
|
|
|
5,535 |
|
|
|
640,976 |
|
|
|
(26,149 |
) |
|
|
687,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,542,799 |
|
|
$ |
5,295,110 |
|
|
$ |
15,246,479 |
|
|
$ |
(11,051,746 |
) |
|
$ |
15,032,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing
organizations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,797,810 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,797,810 |
|
Payable to clients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,011,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,011,564 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
96,538 |
|
|
|
18,217 |
|
|
|
381,337 |
|
|
|
(5,258 |
) |
|
|
490,834 |
|
Payable to affiliates |
|
|
148,341 |
|
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
77,595 |
|
|
|
(224,103 |
) |
|
|
3,604 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,278,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,282,817 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,319 |
|
|
|
405,220 |
|
|
|
(20,891 |
) |
|
|
426,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,523,434 |
|
|
|
62,307 |
|
|
|
9,677,788 |
|
|
|
(250,252 |
) |
|
|
11,013,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
4,019,365 |
|
|
|
5,232,803 |
|
|
|
5,568,691 |
|
|
|
(10,801,494 |
) |
|
|
4,019,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
5,542,799 |
|
|
$ |
5,295,110 |
|
|
$ |
15,246,479 |
|
|
$ |
(11,051,746 |
) |
|
$ |
15,032,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
67,033 |
|
|
$ |
25,058 |
|
|
$ |
649,401 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
741,492 |
|
Cash and investments segregated in
compliance with federal regulations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
994,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
994,026 |
|
Receivable from brokers, dealers and
clearing organizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207,723 |
|
Receivable from clients, net of allowance
for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,391,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,391,432 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
5,180,736 |
|
|
|
4,751,641 |
|
|
|
543,556 |
|
|
|
(10,475,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Receivable from affiliates |
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
218,437 |
|
|
|
128,147 |
|
|
|
(255,420 |
) |
|
|
92,946 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,467,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,467,013 |
|
Acquired intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,674 |
|
|
|
978,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,124,259 |
|
Other |
|
|
91,057 |
|
|
|
5,902 |
|
|
|
640,744 |
|
|
|
(29,676 |
) |
|
|
708,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,340,608 |
|
|
$ |
5,146,712 |
|
|
$ |
15,000,627 |
|
|
$ |
(10,761,029 |
) |
|
$ |
14,726,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing
organizations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,934,315 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,934,315 |
|
Payable to clients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,810,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,810,391 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
96,578 |
|
|
|
18,157 |
|
|
|
366,789 |
|
|
|
(5,218 |
) |
|
|
476,306 |
|
Payable to affiliates |
|
|
174,144 |
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
82,675 |
|
|
|
(255,420 |
) |
|
|
3,244 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,298,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302,269 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,563 |
|
|
|
410,409 |
|
|
|
(24,458 |
) |
|
|
428,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,568,729 |
|
|
|
62,565 |
|
|
|
9,608,841 |
|
|
|
(285,096 |
) |
|
|
10,955,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
3,771,879 |
|
|
|
5,084,147 |
|
|
|
5,391,786 |
|
|
|
(10,475,933 |
) |
|
|
3,771,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
5,340,608 |
|
|
$ |
5,146,712 |
|
|
$ |
15,000,627 |
|
|
$ |
(10,761,029 |
) |
|
$ |
14,726,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
3,825 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
656,174 |
|
|
$ |
(3,871 |
) |
|
$ |
656,190 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
3,613 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
422,298 |
|
|
|
(3,871 |
) |
|
|
422,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
233,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,087 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
10,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity
in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
(10,536 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
233,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,262 |
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
(7,058 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
85,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in income of
subsidiaries |
|
|
(3,478 |
) |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
148,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,039 |
|
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
148,517 |
|
|
|
151,123 |
|
|
|
8,572 |
|
|
|
(308,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
145,039 |
|
|
$ |
151,438 |
|
|
$ |
156,774 |
|
|
$ |
(308,212 |
) |
|
$ |
145,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
4,767 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
624,599 |
|
|
$ |
(4,794 |
) |
|
$ |
624,618 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
2,315 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
386,395 |
|
|
|
(4,794 |
) |
|
|
384,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,452 |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
238,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,400 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
19,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity
in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
(17,194 |
) |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
237,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,379 |
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
(4,273 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
88,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in income of
subsidiaries |
|
|
(12,921 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
149,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,237 |
|
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
149,158 |
|
|
|
149,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(298,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
136,237 |
|
|
$ |
149,323 |
|
|
$ |
149,321 |
|
|
$ |
(298,644 |
) |
|
$ |
136,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Total |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(14,903 |
) |
|
$ |
4,885 |
|
|
$ |
95,247 |
|
|
$ |
85,229 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,225 |
) |
|
|
(30,225 |
) |
Cash received in sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,228 |
|
|
|
5,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,997 |
) |
|
|
(24,997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(2,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,034 |
) |
Return of prepayment on structured stock repurchase |
|
|
118,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,834 |
|
Payment of cash dividends |
|
|
(28,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,680 |
) |
Other |
|
|
5,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,945 |
) |
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
93,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,945 |
) |
|
|
91,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany investing and financing activities, net |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
58,569 |
|
|
|
4,885 |
|
|
|
88,437 |
|
|
|
151,891 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
67,033 |
|
|
|
25,058 |
|
|
|
649,401 |
|
|
|
741,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
125,602 |
|
|
$ |
29,943 |
|
|
$ |
737,838 |
|
|
$ |
893,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Total |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(24,891 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,142 |
) |
|
$ |
316,667 |
|
|
$ |
285,634 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,797 |
) |
|
|
(20,797 |
) |
Proceeds from redemption of money market funds |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
11,124 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
11,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
11,124 |
|
|
|
(20,351 |
) |
|
|
(9,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
1,248,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248,557 |
|
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(10,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,032 |
) |
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(1,406,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,406,500 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(3,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,229 |
) |
Other |
|
|
11,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,718 |
) |
|
|
7,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(160,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,718 |
) |
|
|
(163,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany investing and financing activities, net |
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
|
|
(90,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(19,916 |
) |
|
|
(70,018 |
) |
|
|
202,614 |
|
|
|
112,680 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
45,291 |
|
|
|
109,079 |
|
|
|
636,841 |
|
|
|
791,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
25,375 |
|
|
$ |
39,061 |
|
|
$ |
839,455 |
|
|
$ |
903,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should
be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and the Consolidated Financial Statements
and Notes thereto included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010, and the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained
in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not historical facts, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements include statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words may, could,
would, should, believe, expect, anticipate, plan, estimate, target, project,
intend and similar expressions. In particular, forward-looking statements contained in this discussion include our expectations
regarding: the effect of client trading activity on our results of operations; the effect of
changes in interest rates on our net interest spread; the effect of our migration of client cash
balances into the insured deposit account offering; our effective income tax rate; and our capital
and liquidity needs and our plans to finance such needs.
The Companys actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking
statements. Important factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to:
general economic and political conditions; fluctuations in interest rates; stock market
fluctuations and changes in client trading activity; credit risk with clients and counterparties;
increased competition; systems failures and capacity constraints; network security risks; our
ability to service debt obligations; our ability to achieve the benefits of the thinkorswim Group
Inc. (thinkorswim) acquisition; new laws and regulations affecting our business; regulatory and
legal matters and uncertainties and the other risks and uncertainties set forth under Item 1A.
Risk Factors of the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2010. The forward-looking statements contained in this report speak only as of the date on which
the statements were made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make judgments and estimates that may
have a significant impact upon our financial results. Note 1 of our Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, contains a summary of our
significant accounting policies, many of which require the use of estimates and assumptions.
24
We
believe that the following areas are particularly subject to managements judgments and estimates
and could materially affect our results of operations and financial position: valuation of goodwill
and acquired intangible assets; valuation of stock-based compensation; estimates of effective
income tax rates, deferred income taxes and related valuation allowances; and valuation of
guarantees. These areas are discussed in further detail under the heading Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates in Item 7 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010.
Unless otherwise indicated, the terms we, us, our or Company in this report refer to TD
Ameritrade Holding Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The term GAAP refers to U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
In discussing and analyzing our business, we utilize several metrics and other terms that are
defined in a Glossary of Terms that is available on our website at www.amtd.com (in the Investors
section under the heading Financial Reports) and is included in Item 7 of our annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Since the issuance of our Form 10-K, the
definition of Liquid assets has been renamed Liquid assets regulatory threshold and Liquid
assets management target was added as a new metric. We consider our liquid assets metrics to
be important measures of our liquidity. Liquid assets management target reflects our liquidity
that would be readily available for corporate investing and financing activities under normal
operating circumstances, while liquid assets regulatory threshold reflects our liquidity that
would be available under unusual operating circumstances. In addition to the updated liquid assets
metrics, we added Average client trades per funded account (annualized) as a new metric. The
updated definitions are as follows (italics within a definition indicate other defined terms that
appear elsewhere in the Glossary):
Average client trades per funded account (annualized) Total trades divided by the average number
of funded accounts during the period, annualized based on the number of trading days in the fiscal
year.
Liquid assets management target Liquid assets management target is a non-GAAP financial
measure. We define liquid assets management target as the sum of (a) corporate cash and cash
equivalents, (b) corporate short-term investments and (c) regulatory net capital of (i) our
clearing broker-dealer subsidiary in excess of 10% of aggregate debit items and (ii) our
introducing broker-dealer subsidiaries in excess of a minimum operational target established by
management ($50 million in the case of our primary introducing broker-dealer, TD Ameritrade, Inc.).
We include the excess capital of our broker-dealer subsidiaries in liquid assets management
target, rather than simply including broker-dealer cash and cash equivalents, because capital
requirements may limit the amount of cash available for dividend from the broker-dealer
subsidiaries to the parent company. Excess capital, as defined under clause (c) above, is
generally available for dividend from the broker-dealer subsidiaries to the parent company. We
consider liquid assets management target to be a measure that reflects our liquidity that would
be readily available for corporate investing and financing activities under normal operating
circumstances. Liquid assets regulatory threshold is a related metric that reflects our
liquidity that would be available for corporate investing and financing activities under unusual
operating circumstances. Our liquid assets metrics should be considered as supplemental measures
of liquidity, rather than as substitutes for cash and cash equivalents.
Liquid assets regulatory threshold Liquid assets regulatory threshold is a non-GAAP
financial measure. We define liquid assets regulatory threshold as the sum of (a) corporate cash
and cash equivalents, (b) corporate short-term investments, (c) regulatory net capital of (i) our
clearing broker-dealer subsidiary in excess of 5% of aggregate debit items and (ii) our
introducing broker-dealer subsidiaries in excess of 120% of the minimum dollar net capital
requirement or in excess of 8 1/3% of aggregate indebtedness and (d) Tier 1 capital of our trust
company in excess of the minimum dollar requirement. We include the excess capital of our
broker-dealer and trust company subsidiaries in liquid assets regulatory threshold, rather than
simply including broker-dealer and trust company cash and cash equivalents, because capital
requirements may limit the amount of cash available for dividend from the broker-dealer and trust
company subsidiaries to the parent company. Excess capital, as defined under clauses (c) and (d)
above, is generally available for dividend from the broker-dealer and trust company subsidiaries to
the parent company. We consider liquid assets regulatory threshold to be a measure that
reflects our liquidity that would be available for corporate investing and financing activities
under unusual operating circumstances. Liquid assets management target is a related metric that
reflects our liquidity that would be readily available for corporate investing and financing
activities under normal operating circumstances. Our liquid assets metrics should be considered as
supplemental measures of liquidity, rather than as substitutes for cash and cash equivalents.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Conditions in the U.S. equity markets significantly impact the volume of our clients trading
activity. There is a direct correlation between the volume of our clients trading activity and
our results of operations. We cannot predict future trading volumes in the U.S. equity markets.
If client trading activity increases, we expect that it would have a positive impact on our
25
results
of operations. If client trading activity declines, we expect that it would have a negative impact
on our results of operations.
Changes in average balances, especially client margin, credit, insured deposit account and mutual
fund balances, may significantly impact our results of operations. Changes in interest rates also
significantly impact our results of operations. We seek to mitigate interest rate risk by aligning
the average duration of our interest-earning assets with that of our interest-bearing liabilities.
We cannot predict the direction of interest rates or the levels of client balances. If interest
rates rise, we generally expect to earn a larger net interest spread. Conversely, a falling
interest rate environment generally would result in our earning a smaller net interest spread.
Financial Performance Metrics
Pre-tax income, net income, earnings per share and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization) are key metrics we use in evaluating our financial performance.
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure.
We consider EBITDA an important measure of our financial performance and of our ability to generate
cash flows to service debt, fund capital expenditures and fund other corporate investing and
financing activities. EBITDA is used as the denominator in the consolidated leverage ratio
calculation for covenant purposes under our revolving credit facility. EBITDA eliminates the
non-cash effect of tangible asset depreciation and amortization and intangible asset amortization.
EBITDA should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, pre-tax income, net
income and cash flows from operating activities.
The following table sets forth EBITDA in dollars and as a percentage of net revenues for the
periods indicated and provides reconciliations to net income, which is the most directly comparable
GAAP measure (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenue |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
274,814 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
% |
|
$ |
271,198 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
% |
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(16,136 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
%) |
|
|
(13,610 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
%) |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
(24,591 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
%) |
|
|
(25,580 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
%) |
Interest on borrowings |
|
|
(10,825 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
%) |
|
|
(11,629 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
%) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(78,223 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
%) |
|
|
(84,142 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
145,039 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
$ |
136,237 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our EBITDA increased slightly for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily due to a 5% increase in net revenues and the effect of an $8.4
million loss on debt refinancing during the first quarter of fiscal 2010,
substantially offset by a 10% increase in total operating expenses. The increase in net revenues
was due primarily to growth in average spread-based balances, partially offset by lower net
interest margin earned on the spread-based balances and lower average commissions and transaction
fees per trade. The increase in total operating expenses was due primarily to increases in employee
compensation and benefits, advertising and professional services expenses. Detailed analysis of
net revenues and operating expenses is presented later in this discussion.
Operating Metrics
Our largest sources of revenues are asset-based revenues and transaction-based revenues. For the
three months ended December 31, 2010, asset-based revenues and transaction-based revenues accounted
for 51% and 45% of our net revenues, respectively. Asset-based revenues consist of (1) net
interest revenue, (2) insured deposit account fees and (3) investment product fees. The primary
factors driving our asset-based revenues are average balances and average rates. Average balances
consist primarily of average client margin balances, average segregated cash balances, average
client credit balances, average client insured deposit account balances, average fee-based
investment balances and average securities borrowing and lending balances. Average rates consist
of the average interest rates and fees earned and paid on such balances. The primary factors
driving our transaction-based revenues are total client trades and average commissions and
transaction fees per trade. We also consider client account and client asset metrics, although we
believe they are generally of less significance to our results of operations for any particular
period than our metrics for asset-based and transaction-based revenues.
26
Asset-Based Revenue Metrics
We calculate the return on our interest-earning assets (excluding conduit-based assets) and our
insured deposit account balances using a measure we refer to as net interest margin. Net interest
margin is calculated for a given period by dividing the annualized sum of net interest revenue
(excluding net interest revenue from conduit-based assets) and insured deposit account fees by
average spread-based assets. Spread-based assets consist of client and brokerage-related asset
balances, including client margin balances, segregated cash, insured deposit account balances,
deposits paid on securities borrowing (excluding conduit-based assets) and other cash and
interest-earning investment balances. The following table sets forth net interest margin and
average spread-based assets (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Avg. interest-earning assets (excluding conduit business) |
|
$ |
12,972 |
|
|
$ |
15,522 |
|
|
$ |
(2,550 |
) |
Avg. insured deposit account balances |
|
|
44,735 |
|
|
|
32,578 |
|
|
|
12,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. spread-based balances |
|
$ |
57,707 |
|
|
$ |
48,100 |
|
|
$ |
9,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue (excluding conduit business) |
|
$ |
115.4 |
|
|
$ |
99.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
Insured deposit account fee revenue |
|
|
178.5 |
|
|
|
155.3 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread-based revenue |
|
$ |
293.9 |
|
|
$ |
254.5 |
|
|
$ |
39.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. annualized yield interest-earning assets
(excluding conduit business) |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
0.98 |
% |
Avg. annualized yield insured deposit account fees |
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
(0.31 |
%) |
Net interest margin (NIM) |
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
(0.08 |
%) |
The following tables set forth key metrics that we use in analyzing net interest revenue, which,
exclusive of the conduit business, is a component of net interest margin (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Revenue (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Segregated cash |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
Client margin balances |
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Securities borrowing (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Other cash and interest-earning investments, net |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Client credit balances |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
Securities lending (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
115.4 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities borrowing conduit business |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Securities lending conduit business |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
$ |
115.5 |
|
|
$ |
99.4 |
|
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Segregated cash |
|
$ |
3,266 |
|
|
$ |
7,823 |
|
|
|
(58 |
%) |
Client margin balances |
|
|
8,121 |
|
|
|
6,081 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
Securities borrowing (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
(29 |
%) |
Other cash and interest-earning investments |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
12,972 |
|
|
|
15,522 |
|
|
|
(16 |
%) |
Securities borrowing conduit business |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
(36 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
13,331 |
|
|
$ |
16,083 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client credit balances |
|
$ |
7,970 |
|
|
$ |
10,901 |
|
|
|
(27 |
%) |
Securities lending (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
9,571 |
|
|
|
12,494 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
Securities lending conduit business |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
(36 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
9,930 |
|
|
$ |
13,055 |
|
|
|
(24 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. Annualized Yield (Cost) |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Net Yield |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Increase/ |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Decrease) |
Segregated cash |
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Client margin balances |
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
(0.34 |
%) |
Other cash and interest-earning investments, net |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
(0.03 |
%) |
Client credit balances |
|
|
(0.03 |
%) |
|
|
(0.04 |
%) |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue (excluding conduit business) |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
0.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities borrowing conduit business |
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
(0.07 |
%) |
Securities lending conduit business |
|
|
(0.13 |
%) |
|
|
(0.22 |
%) |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
The following tables set forth key metrics that we use in analyzing investment product fee revenues
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Money market mutual fund |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
Other investment product fees |
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment product fees |
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Money market mutual fund |
|
$ |
8,837 |
|
|
$ |
11,942 |
|
|
|
(26 |
%) |
Other fee-based investment balances |
|
|
63,908 |
|
|
|
46,516 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fee-based investment balances |
|
$ |
72,745 |
|
|
$ |
58,458 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annualized Yield |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Increase/ |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Decrease) |
Money market mutual fund |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
Other investment product fees |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
Total investment product fees |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
Transaction-Based Revenue Metrics
The following table sets forth several key metrics regarding client trading activity, which we
utilize in measuring and evaluating performance and the results of our operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
Total trades (in millions) |
|
|
23.62 |
|
|
|
23.85 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Average commissions and transaction fees per trade (1) |
|
$ |
12.39 |
|
|
$ |
12.98 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Average client trades per day |
|
|
371,916 |
|
|
|
378,561 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Average client trades per total account (annualized) |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Average client trades per funded account (annualized) |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Activity rate total accounts |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Activity rate funded accounts |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Trading days |
|
|
63.5 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average commissions and transaction fees per trade excludes thinkorswim active trader and
TD Waterhouse UK businesses. |
Client Account and Client Asset Metrics
The following table sets forth certain metrics regarding client accounts and client assets, which
we use to analyze growth and trends in our client base:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
Total accounts (beginning of period) |
|
|
7,946,000 |
|
|
|
7,563,000 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
New accounts opened |
|
|
164,000 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
Accounts closed |
|
|
(73,000 |
) |
|
|
(68,000 |
) |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts (end of period) |
|
|
8,037,000 |
|
|
|
7,675,000 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage change during period |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded accounts (beginning of period) |
|
|
5,455,000 |
|
|
|
5,279,000 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Funded accounts (end of period) |
|
|
5,491,000 |
|
|
|
5,327,000 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Percentage change during period |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client assets (beginning of period, in billions) |
|
$ |
354.8 |
|
|
$ |
302.0 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Client assets (end of period, in billions) |
|
$ |
386.4 |
|
|
$ |
318.6 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Percentage change during period |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net new assets (in billions) |
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Net new assets annualized growth rate (1) |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Annualized net new assets as a percentage of client assets as of the beginning of the
period. |
29
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income Data
The following table summarizes certain data from our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
for analysis purposes (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction-based revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and transaction fees |
|
$ |
292.7 |
|
|
$ |
309.4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-based revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
|
116.8 |
|
|
|
101.2 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Brokerage interest expense |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
|
115.5 |
|
|
|
99.4 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured deposit account fees |
|
|
178.5 |
|
|
|
155.3 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Investment product fees |
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-based revenues |
|
|
334.7 |
|
|
|
284.2 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Other revenues |
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
656.2 |
|
|
|
624.6 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
162.4 |
|
|
|
146.6 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Clearing and execution costs |
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Communications |
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Occupancy and equipment costs |
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Professional services |
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Advertising |
|
|
74.6 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Other |
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
422.1 |
|
|
|
384.2 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
234.1 |
|
|
|
240.4 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Loss on debt refinancing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
(46 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income |
|
|
223.3 |
|
|
|
220.4 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
145.0 |
|
|
$ |
136.2 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Average debt outstanding |
|
$ |
1,273.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,378.3 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
Average interest rate incurred on borrowings |
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Note: Details may not sum to totals and subtotals due to rounding differences. Change
percentages
are based on non-rounded amounts from the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
30
Three-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
Net Revenues
Commissions and transaction fees decreased 5% to $292.7 million, primarily due to lower average
commissions and transaction fees per trade and slightly lower average client trades per day.
Average commissions and transaction fees per trade decreased to $12.39 per trade for the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 from $12.98 for the first quarter of fiscal 2010, primarily due to lower
payment for order flow revenue per trade and the mix of client trading activity during the first
quarter of fiscal 2011. Average client trades per day decreased 2% to 371,916 for the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to 378,561 for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Average client
trades per funded account (annualized) were 17.2 for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to
17.9 for the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Net interest revenue increased 16% to $115.5 million, due primarily to a 34% increase in average
client margin balances, partially offset by a decrease of 34 basis points in the average yield
earned on client margin balances for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter
of fiscal 2010.
Insured deposit account fees increased 15% to $178.5 million, due primarily to a 37% increase in
average client insured deposit account balances during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increased insured deposit account balances are partly due to
our success in attracting net new client assets over the past year and partly due to our strategy
of migrating client cash held in client credit balances or swept to money market mutual funds to
the insured deposit account offering. We began migrating client cash in April 2009 and completed
the program in January 2010. We expect our migration strategy to position the Company to earn
higher net revenues, as we generally earn a higher yield on insured deposit account balances than
on money market mutual fund or client credit balances. The effect of the increased insured deposit
account balances was partially offset by a decrease of 31 basis points in the average yield earned
on the insured deposit account assets during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Investment product fees increased 38% to $40.7 million, primarily due to a 37% increase in average
other fee-based investment balances and an increase of 7 basis points in the average yield earned
on client money market mutual fund balances, partially offset by a 26% decrease in average money
market mutual fund balances in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of
fiscal 2010. The decrease in average money market mutual fund balances resulted primarily from our
client cash migration strategy discussed above.
Operating Expenses
Employee compensation and benefits expense increased 11% to $162.4 million, primarily due to higher
incentive-based compensation related to Company and individual performance, including our continued
success in attracting net new client assets, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the
first quarter of fiscal 2010. The average number of full-time equivalent employees was 5,257 for
the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to 5,240 for the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Clearing and execution costs increased 9% to $23.8 million, due primarily to an increase in
outsourced clearing fees for our thinkorswim business in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared
to the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Communications expense increased 9% to $26.9 million, due primarily to increased costs for quotes
and market information during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of
fiscal 2010.
Depreciation and amortization increased 19% to $16.1 million, due primarily to depreciation on
recent technology infrastructure upgrades and leasehold improvements.
Professional services increased 20% to $40.3 million, primarily due to higher usage of consulting
and contract services during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 in connection with new product development, technology infrastructure upgrades and the
integration of thinkorswim.
Advertising expense increased 14% to $74.6 million, primarily due to the timing of more marketing
campaigns earlier in the year during fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010. We generally adjust our
level of advertising spending in relation to stock market activity and other market conditions in
an effort to maximize the number of new accounts while minimizing the advertising cost per new
account.
31
Other Expenses and Income Taxes
Interest on borrowings decreased 7% to $10.8 million, due primarily to a decrease of approximately
$105 million in average debt outstanding, partially offset by higher average interest rates
incurred on our debt during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of
fiscal 2010. The average interest rate incurred on our debt was 3.09% for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011, compared to 2.94% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. On January 7, 2011, we
entered into a fixed-for-variable interest rate swap on our $500 million 5.600% Senior Notes due
2019. We will incur variable interest under this interest rate swap at a rate equal to three-month
LIBOR plus 2.3745%, or approximately 2.65% at the inception of the swap. The entire $1.25 billion
of our Senior Notes is now subject to interest rate swaps based on three-month LIBOR. The interest
rate swap on the 2019 Notes decreased the weighted-average interest rate incurred on our debt to
approximately 1.95% as of January 7, 2011. However, we cannot predict the direction or timing of
future changes in interest rates.
Loss on debt refinancing of $8.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009, consists of
a charge to write off the unamortized balance of debt issuance costs associated with the Term A and
Term B credit facilities under our January 23, 2006 credit agreement. On November 25, 2009, we
refinanced our long-term debt by issuing the Senior Notes and used the proceeds from the issuance
of the Senior Notes, together with cash on hand, to repay in full the outstanding principal under
our January 23, 2006 credit agreement.
Our effective income tax rate was 35.0% for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to 38.2% for
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was
unusually low due to $4.9 million of favorable resolutions of state income tax matters and $1.4
million of favorable deferred income tax adjustments resulting from recent state income tax law
changes. These items favorably impacted the Companys earnings for the three months ended December
31, 2010 by approximately $0.01 per share. We expect our effective income tax rate to range from
38% to 39% for the remainder of fiscal 2011. However, we expect to experience some volatility in
our quarterly and annual effective income tax rate because current accounting rules for uncertain
tax positions require that any change in measurement of a tax position taken in a prior tax year be
recognized as a discrete event in the period in which the change occurs.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have historically financed our liquidity and capital needs primarily through the use of funds
generated from operations and from borrowings under our credit agreements. We have also issued
common stock and long-term debt to finance mergers and acquisitions and for other corporate
purposes. Our liquidity needs during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were financed primarily from
our earnings and cash on hand. We plan to finance our operational capital and liquidity needs
during the
remainder of fiscal 2011 primarily from our earnings, cash on hand and, if necessary, borrowings on
our parent company and broker-dealer credit facilities.
On July 20, 2009, our broker-dealer subsidiary TD Ameritrade, Inc. entered into settlement
agreements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other regulatory authorities, in
which we agreed to extend an offer to purchase eligible auction rate securities (ARS) from
certain current and former account holders. The offer commenced on August 10, 2009. The final
phase of the offer expired on March 23, 2010 and TD Ameritrade, Inc. completed the repurchases on
March 30, 2010. Through March 30, 2010, TD Ameritrade, Inc. purchased eligible ARS with an
aggregate par value of approximately $305 million. ARS are long-term variable rate securities tied
to short-term interest rates that are reset through a Dutch auction process. In February 2008,
the Dutch auction process failed and holders were no longer able to liquidate their holdings
through the auction process. Funds from ARS are not expected to be accessible until one of the
following occurs: a successful auction, the issuer redeems the issue, a buyer is found outside of
the auction process or the underlying securities mature. Substantial delays in the sale or
redemption of our ARS holdings could adversely affect our liquidity and require us to borrow on our
lines of credit or seek alternative financing. As of December 31, 2010, TD Ameritrade, Inc. held
ARS with a fair value of approximately $195 million. During January 2011, we received $58 million
of ARS redemptions at par value.
Dividends from our subsidiaries are a source of liquidity for the parent company. Some of our
subsidiaries are subject to requirements of the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(FINRA), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the National Futures Association
(NFA) and other regulators relating to liquidity, capital standards and the use of client funds
and securities, which may limit funds available for the payment of dividends to the parent company.
Under the SECs Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934),
our broker-dealer subsidiaries are required to maintain, at all times, at least the minimum level
of net capital required under Rule 15c3-1. For clearing broker-dealers, this minimum net capital
level is determined by a calculation described in Rule 15c3-1 that is primarily based on each
broker-dealers aggregate debits, which primarily are a function of client margin balances at our
clearing broker-dealer subsidiary. Since our aggregate debits may fluctuate significantly, our
minimum net capital requirements may also fluctuate significantly from period to period. The
parent company may make cash capital contributions to broker-dealer subsidiaries, if necessary, to
meet minimum net capital requirements.
32
Liquid Assets
We consider our liquid assets metrics to be important measures of our liquidity and of our ability
to fund corporate investing and financing activities. Our liquid assets metrics are considered
non-GAAP financial measures. We include the excess capital of our broker-dealer and trust company
subsidiaries in the calculation of our liquid assets metrics, rather than simply including
broker-dealer and trust company cash and cash equivalents, because capital requirements may limit
the amount of cash available for dividend from the broker-dealer and trust company subsidiaries to
the parent company. Excess capital, as defined below, is generally available for dividend from the
broker-dealer and trust company subsidiaries to the parent company. The liquid assets metrics
should be considered as supplemental measures of liquidity, rather than as substitutes for cash and
cash equivalents.
We define liquid assets management target as the sum of (a) corporate cash and cash equivalents,
(b) corporate short-term investments and (c) regulatory net capital of (i) our clearing
broker-dealer subsidiary in excess of 10% of aggregate debit items and (ii) our introducing
broker-dealer subsidiaries in excess of a minimum operational target established by management ($50
million in the case of our primary introducing broker-dealer, TD Ameritrade, Inc.). We consider
liquid assets management target to be a measure that reflects our liquidity that would be readily
available for corporate investing or financing activities under normal operating circumstances.
We define liquid assets regulatory threshold as the sum of (a) corporate cash and cash
equivalents, (b) corporate short-term investments, (c) regulatory net capital of (i) our clearing
broker-dealer subsidiary in excess of 5% of aggregate debit items and (ii) our introducing
broker-dealer subsidiaries in excess of 120% of the minimum dollar net capital requirement or in
excess of 8 1/3% of aggregate indebtedness and (d) Tier 1 capital of our trust company in excess of
the minimum dollar requirement. We consider liquid assets regulatory threshold to be a measure
that reflects our liquidity that would be available for corporate investing or financing activities
under unusual operating circumstances.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents, which is the most
directly comparable GAAP measure, to our liquid assets metrics (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid Assets - |
|
|
Liquid Assets - |
|
|
|
Management Target |
|
|
Regulatory Threshold |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
893,383 |
|
|
$ |
741,492 |
|
|
$ |
151,891 |
|
|
$ |
893,383 |
|
|
$ |
741,492 |
|
|
$ |
151,891 |
|
Less: Broker-dealer cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(459,728 |
) |
|
|
(426,618 |
) |
|
|
(33,110 |
) |
|
|
(459,728 |
) |
|
|
(426,618 |
) |
|
|
(33,110 |
) |
Trust company cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(60,632 |
) |
|
|
(50,937 |
) |
|
|
(9,695 |
) |
|
|
(60,632 |
) |
|
|
(50,937 |
) |
|
|
(9,695 |
) |
Investment advisory cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(32,178 |
) |
|
|
(28,944 |
) |
|
|
(3,234 |
) |
|
|
(32,178 |
) |
|
|
(28,944 |
) |
|
|
(3,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
340,845 |
|
|
|
234,993 |
|
|
|
105,852 |
|
|
|
340,845 |
|
|
|
234,993 |
|
|
|
105,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus: Excess trust company Tier 1 capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,039 |
|
|
|
12,284 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
Excess broker-dealer regulatory net capital |
|
|
419,125 |
|
|
|
326,368 |
|
|
|
92,757 |
|
|
|
940,216 |
|
|
|
828,979 |
|
|
|
111,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
$ |
759,970 |
|
|
$ |
561,361 |
|
|
$ |
198,609 |
|
|
$ |
1,293,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,076,256 |
|
|
$ |
216,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
The increase in liquid assets is summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid Assets |
|
|
|
Management |
|
|
Regulatory |
|
|
|
Target |
|
|
Threshold |
|
Liquid assets as of September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
561,361 |
|
|
$ |
1,076,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus: Pre-tax income |
|
|
223,262 |
|
|
|
223,262 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
Cash received in sale of business |
|
|
5,228 |
|
|
|
5,228 |
|
Return of prepayment on structured stock repurchase |
|
|
118,834 |
|
|
|
118,834 |
|
Other changes in working capital and regulatory net capital |
|
|
23,816 |
|
|
|
13,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Income taxes paid |
|
|
(54,003 |
) |
|
|
(54,003 |
) |
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(30,225 |
) |
|
|
(30,225 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(2,034 |
) |
|
|
(2,034 |
) |
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(1,945 |
) |
|
|
(1,945 |
) |
Payment of cash dividends |
|
|
(28,680 |
) |
|
|
(28,680 |
) |
Additional net capital requirement due to increase in aggregate debits |
|
|
(56,362 |
) |
|
|
(28,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
759,970 |
|
|
$ |
1,293,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Repurchase Programs
On August 5, 2010, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 30 million shares of
our common stock. On August 20, 2010, we entered into an agreement with an investment bank
counterparty to effect a structured repurchase of up to 12 million shares of our common stock.
Under the terms of this agreement, we prepaid $169.2 million to the counterparty. Settlement of
the transaction occurred on December 1, 2010 and we purchased approximately 3.2 million shares for
approximately $50.4 million ($15.94 per share). The number of shares we purchased from the
counterparty and the purchase price were based on the average of the daily volume-weighted average
share price of our common stock over the measurement period for the transaction, less a
pre-determined discount. Upon settlement of this transaction, the excess prepayment amount of
$118.8 million was returned to us in cash. As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately 26.8
million shares remaining on the stock repurchase authorization.
Cash Dividends
Our board of directors declared a $0.05 per share quarterly cash dividend on our common stock
during each of the first and second quarters of fiscal 2011. On December 15, 2010 we paid $28.7
million to fund the first quarter dividend and we expect to pay approximately $29 million on
February 15, 2011 to fund the second quarter dividend.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We enter into guarantees and other off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of
business, primarily to meet the needs of our clients and manage our asset-based revenues. For
information on these arrangements, see the following sections under Item 1, Financial Statements
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: Guarantees under Note 7 COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES and Insured Deposit Account Agreement under Note 12 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.
The IDA agreement accounts for a significant percentage of our revenues (27% of our net revenues
for the quarter ended December 31, 2010) and enables our clients to invest in an FDIC-insured
deposit product without the need for the Company to maintain a bank charter.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Market risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential change in the
value of a financial instrument as a result of fluctuations in interest rates and market prices. We
have established policies, procedures and internal processes governing our management of market
risks in the normal course of our business operations.
34
Market-related Credit Risk
Two primary sources of credit risk inherent in our business are client margin lending and
securities lending and borrowing. We manage risk on client margin lending by requiring clients to
maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines. We monitor
required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, require our clients to deposit
additional collateral, or to reduce positions, when necessary. We continuously monitor client
accounts to detect excessive concentration, large orders or positions, patterns of day trading and
other activities that indicate increased risk to us. We manage risks associated with our
securities lending and borrowing activities by requiring credit approvals for counterparties, by
monitoring the market value of securities loaned and collateral values for securities borrowed on a
daily basis and requiring additional cash as collateral for securities loaned or return of
collateral for securities borrowed when necessary and by participating in a risk-sharing program
offered through the Options Clearing Corporation.
The interest rate swaps on our Senior Notes are subject to counterparty credit risk. Credit risk
on derivative financial instruments is managed by limiting activity to approved counterparties that
meet a minimum credit rating threshold and by entering into credit support agreements. The
bilateral credit support agreements related to the interest rate swaps require daily collateral
coverage, in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury securities, for the aggregate fair value of the
interest rate swaps.
Interest Rate Risk
As a fundamental part of our brokerage business, we invest in interest-earning assets and are
obligated on interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, we earn fees on our insured deposit
account arrangement with TD Bank USA, N.A. and TD Bank, N.A. and on money market mutual funds,
which are subject to interest rate risk. Changes in interest rates could affect the interest earned
on assets differently than interest paid on liabilities. A rising interest rate environment
generally results in our earning a larger net interest spread. Conversely, a falling interest rate
environment generally results in our earning a smaller net interest spread.
Our most prevalent form of interest rate risk is referred to as gap risk. This risk occurs when
the interest rates we earn on our assets change at a different frequency or amount than the
interest rates we pay on our liabilities. We have an Asset/Liability Committee as the governance
body with the responsibility of managing interest rate risk, including gap risk.
We use net interest simulation modeling techniques to evaluate the effect that changes in interest
rates might have on pre-tax income. Our model includes all interest-sensitive assets and
liabilities of the Company and interest-sensitive assets and liabilities associated with the
insured deposit account arrangement. The simulations involve assumptions that are inherently
uncertain and, as a result, cannot precisely predict the impact that changes in interest rates will
have on pre-tax income. Actual results may differ from simulated results due to differences in
timing and frequency of rate changes, changes in market conditions and changes in management
strategy that lead to changes in the mix of interest-sensitive assets and liabilities.
The simulations assume that the asset and liability structure of our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet and the insured deposit account arrangement would not be changed as a result of a simulated
change in interest rates. The results of the
simulations based on our financial position as of December 31, 2010 indicate that a gradual 1% (100
basis points) increase in interest rates over a 12-month period would result in approximately $99
million higher pre-tax income, while a gradual 1% (100 basis points) decrease in interest rates
over a 12-month period would result in approximately $29 million lower pre-tax income. The results
of the simulations reflect the fact that short-term interest rates remain at historically low
levels, including the federal funds target rate, which is currently a range of zero to 0.25%.
Market Risk on Auction Rate Securities
As of December 31, 2010, we held ARS with a fair value of $195 million. A hypothetical 10%
decrease in the fair value of our ARS would reduce our pre-tax income by approximately $19 million.
Other Market Risks
Our revenues and financial instruments are denominated in U.S. dollars. We generally do not enter
into derivative transactions, except for hedging purposes.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of December
31, 2010. Management, including the Chief Executive
35
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
Spam Litigation A purported class action, captioned Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc., was filed on
May 31, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
complaint alleges that there was a breach in TD Ameritrade, Inc.s systems, which allowed access to
e-mail addresses and other personal information of account holders, and that as a result account
holders received unsolicited e-mail from spammers promoting certain stocks and have been subjected
to an increased risk of identity theft. The complaint requests unspecified damages and injunctive
and other equitable relief. A second lawsuit, captioned Zigler v. TD Ameritrade, Inc., was filed
on September 26, 2007, in the same jurisdiction on behalf of a purported nationwide class of
account holders. The factual allegations of the complaint and the relief sought are substantially
the same as those in the first lawsuit. The cases were consolidated under the caption In re TD
Ameritrade Accountholders Litigation. The Company hired an independent consultant to investigate
whether identity theft occurred as a result of the breach. The consultant conducted four
investigations from August 2007 to June 2008 and reported that it found no evidence of identity
theft. On December 20, 2010, TD Ameritrade, Inc. received preliminary Court approval of a proposed
class settlement agreement between TD Ameritrade, Inc. and plaintiffs Richard Holober and Brad
Zigler. Under the proposed settlement, the Company will pay no less than $2.5 million in settlement
benefits. Total compensation to be paid to all eligible members of the settlement class will not
exceed $6.5 million, inclusive of any award of attorneys fees and costs. In addition, the
settlement agreement provides that the Company will retain an independent information technology
security consultant to assess whether the Company has met certain information technology security
standards. The proposed settlement is subject to final approval by the Court. A hearing on final
approval of the proposed settlement is scheduled for April 7, 2011.
Reserve Fund Matters During September 2008, The Reserve, an independent mutual fund company,
announced that the net asset value of the Reserve Yield Plus Fund declined below $1.00 per share.
The Yield Plus Fund is not a money market mutual fund, but its stated objective was to maintain a
net asset value of $1.00 per share. TD Ameritrade, Inc.s clients hold shares in the Yield Plus
Fund, which is being liquidated by The Reserve.
On July 23, 2010, The Reserve announced that through that date it had distributed approximately
94.8% of the Yield Plus Fund assets as of September 15, 2008 and that the Yield Plus Fund had
approximately $39.7 million in total remaining assets. The Reserve stated that the funds Board of
Trustees has set aside almost the entire amount of the remaining assets to cover
potential claims, fees and expenses. The Company estimates that TD Ameritrade, Inc. clients
current positions held in the Reserve Yield Plus Fund amount to approximately 79% of the fund,
which, if valued based on a $1.00 per share net asset value, would total approximately $47.3
million.
TD Ameritrade, Inc. has received subpoenas and other requests for documents and information from
the SEC and other regulatory authorities regarding TD Ameritrade, Inc.s offering of the Yield Plus
Fund to clients. TD Ameritrade, Inc. is cooperating with the investigations and requests. On
January 27, 2011, TD Ameritrade, Inc. entered into a settlement with the SEC, agreeing to the entry of an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant
to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial
Sanctions (Order). In the Order, the SEC finds that TD Ameritrade, Inc. failed reasonably to
supervise its registered representatives with a view to preventing their violations of Section
17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with their offer and sale of the Yield Plus
Fund. TD Ameritrade, Inc. did not admit or deny any of the findings in the Order, and no fine was
imposed.
Under the settlement agreement, TD Ameritrade, Inc. agreed to pay $0.012 per share to
all eligible current or former clients that purchased shares of the Yield Plus Fund and continue to
own those shares. Clients that purchased Yield Plus Fund shares through independent registered
investment advisors are not eligible for the payment. The Company estimates that payments
to clients under the settlement will total approximately $10 million. The Company had approximately $10 million accrued for this matter as of December 31, 2010.
The Pennsylvania Securities Commission has filed an administrative order against TD Ameritrade,
Inc. involving the sale of Yield Plus Fund securities to 21 Pennsylvania clients. An
administrative hearing will be held to determine whether there have
36
been violations of certain
provisions of the Pennsylvania Securities Act of 1972 and rules thereunder and to determine what,
if any, administrative sanctions should be imposed. TD Ameritrade, Inc. is defending the action.
In November 2008, a purported class action lawsuit was filed with respect to the Yield Plus Fund.
The lawsuit is captioned Ross v. Reserve Management Company, Inc. et al. and is pending in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Ross lawsuit is on behalf of persons who
purchased shares of Reserve Yield Plus Fund. On November 20, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a first
amended complaint naming as defendants the funds advisor, certain of its affiliates and the
Company and certain of its directors, officers and shareholders as alleged control persons. The
complaint alleges claims of violations of the federal securities laws and other claims based on
allegations that false and misleading statements and omissions were made in the Reserve Yield Plus
Fund prospectuses and in other statements regarding the fund. The complaint seeks an unspecified
amount of compensatory damages including interest, attorneys fees, rescission, exemplary damages
and equitable relief. On January 19, 2010, the defendants submitted motions to dismiss the
complaint. The motions are pending.
The Company is unable to predict the outcome or the timing of the ultimate resolution of the
Pennsylvania action and the Ross lawsuit, or the potential loss, if any, that may result from these
unresolved matters. However, management believes the outcome of these pending proceedings is not
likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows of the Company.
Other Legal and Regulatory Matters The Company is subject to other lawsuits, arbitrations,
claims and other legal proceedings in connection with its business. Some of these legal actions
include claims for substantial or unspecified compensatory and/or punitive damages. A substantial
adverse judgment or other unfavorable resolution of these matters could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations and cash flows or could cause
the Company significant reputational harm. Management believes the Company has adequate legal
defenses with respect to these legal proceedings to which it is a defendant or respondent and the
outcome of these pending proceedings is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. However, the Company is
unable to predict the outcome or the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters, or the
potential losses, if any, that may result from these matters.
In the normal course of business, the Company discusses matters with its regulators raised during
regulatory examinations or otherwise subject to their inquiry. These matters could result in
censures, fines, penalties or other sanctions. Management believes the outcome of any resulting
actions will not be material to the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows. However, the Company is unable to predict the outcome or the timing of the ultimate
resolution of these matters, or the potential fines, penalties or injunctive or other equitable
relief, if any, that may result from these matters.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed under Item 1A Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results of operations. The risks described in our Form 10-K are not the only risks facing
us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to
be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Announced Program |
|
|
Under the Program |
|
October 1, 2010 October 31, 2010 |
|
|
118,537 |
|
|
$ |
16.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000,000 |
|
November 1, 2010 November 30, 2010 |
|
|
2,901 |
|
|
$ |
17.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000,000 |
|
December 1, 2010 December 31, 2010 |
|
|
3,159,409 |
|
|
$ |
15.94 |
|
|
|
3,159,360 |
|
|
|
26,840,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Three months ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
3,280,847 |
|
|
$ |
15.97 |
|
|
|
3,159,360 |
|
|
|
26,840,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 5, 2010, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 30 million shares
of our common stock. We disclosed this authorization on August 9, 2010 in our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q. On August 20, 2010, we entered into an
37
agreement with an investment bank counterparty
to effect a structured repurchase of up to 12 million shares of our common stock. The shares were
to be repurchased as part of the 30 million share repurchase authorization. Under the terms of
this agreement, we prepaid approximately $169 million to the counterparty. Settlement of the
transaction occurred on December 1, 2010 and we purchased approximately 3.2 million shares for
approximately $50.4 million ($15.94 per share). The number of shares we purchased from the
counterparty and the purchase price were based on the average of the daily volume-weighted average
share price of our common stock over the measurement period for the transaction, less a
pre-determined discount. Upon settlement of this transaction, the excess prepayment amount of
$118.8 million was returned to us in cash. This program was the only stock repurchase program in
effect and no programs expired during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, 121,487 shares were repurchased from employees for
income tax withholding in connection with restricted stock unit and restricted stock award
distributions.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TD Ameritrade Holding
Corporation, dated January 24, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the
Companys Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2006) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation, effective
March 9, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed
on March 15, 2006) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated November 25, 2009, among TD Ameritrade
Holding Corporation, TD Ameritrade Online Holdings Corp., as guarantor, and The Bank of
New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on November 25, 2009) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Form of 2.950% Senior Note due 2012 (included in Exhibit 4.1) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Form of 4.150% Senior Note due 2014 (included in Exhibit 4.1) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of 5.600% Senior Note due 2019 (included in Exhibit 4.1) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Employees |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-employee Directors |
|
|
|
14
|
|
Code of Ethics |
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Awareness Letter of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Fredric J. Tomczyk, Principal Executive Officer, as required
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of William J. Gerber, Principal Financial Officer, as required
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation |
38
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: February 4, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ FREDRIC J. TOMCZYK
|
|
|
|
Fredric J. Tomczyk |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ WILLIAM J. GERBER
|
|
|
|
William J. Gerber |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
39