e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 001-16577
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter).
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-3150651 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5151 Corporate Drive, Troy, Michigan
|
|
48098-2639 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(248) 312-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days.
Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ.
As of August 2, 2010, 153,363,870 shares of the registrants common stock, $0.01 par value,
were issued and outstanding.
FORWARDLOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial
condition, results of operations, liquidity, plans, objectives, future performance and business of
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. (Flagstar or the Company) and these statements are subject to risk and
uncertainty. Forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995, include those using words or phrases such as believes, expects,
anticipates, plans, trend, objective, continue, remain, pattern or similar
expressions or future or conditional verbs such as will, would, should, could, might,
can, may or similar expressions.
There are a number of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially
from historical performance and these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed under the heading Risk Factors in
Part I, Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
and under Part II, Item 1A of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including: (1) our business has
been and may continue to be adversely affected by conditions in the global financial markets and
economic conditions generally; (2) defaults by another larger financial institution could adversely
affect financial markets generally; (3) we may be required to raise capital at terms that are
materially adverse to our stockholders; (4) if we cannot effectively manage the impact of the
volatility of interest rates our earnings could be adversely affected; (5) if we do not meet the
New York Stock Exchange continued listing requirements, our common stock may be delisted; (6)
current and further deterioration in the housing market, as well as the number of programs that
have been introduced to address the situation by government agencies and government sponsored
enterprises, may lead to increased costs to service loans which could affect our margins or impair
the value of our mortgage servicing rights; (7) current and further deterioration in the housing
and commercial real estate markets may lead to increased loss severities and further increases in
delinquencies and non-performing assets in our loan portfolios. Consequently, our allowance for
loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses, and we may be required to materially
increase our reserves; (8) changes in the fair value or ratings downgrades of our securities may
reduce our stockholders equity, net earnings, or regulatory capital ratios; (9) certain hedging
strategies that we use to manage our investment in mortgage servicing rights may be ineffective to
offset any adverse changes in the fair value of these assets due to changes in interest rates and
market liquidity; (10) our ability to borrow funds, maintain or increase deposits or raise capital
could be limited, which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; (11) our business is
highly regulated and subject to change; (12) we are subject to the restrictions and conditions of
supervisory agreements with the Office of Thrift Supervision. Failure to comply with the
supervisory agreements could result in further enforcement action against us; (13) increases in
deposit insurance premiums and special Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments will
adversely affect our earnings; (14) we are subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny with respect
to bank secrecy and anti-money laundering statutes and regulations; (15) future dividend payments
and common stock repurchases may be restricted; (16) we depend on our institutional counterparties
to provide services that are critical to our business. If one or more of our institutional
counterparties defaults on its obligations to us or becomes insolvent, it could have a material
adverse affect on our earnings, liquidity, capital position and financial condition; (17) we use
estimates in determining the fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be
incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation; (18) our home equity lines of credit
funding reimbursements could be negatively impacted by loan losses; (19) our secondary market
reserve for losses could be insufficient; (20) our home lending profitability could be
significantly reduced if we are not able to resell mortgages; (21) our holding company is dependent
on Flagstar Bank for funding of obligations and dividends; (22) we may be exposed to other
operational and reputational risks; (23) we have many new members of our executive team; (24) the
potential loss of key members of senior management or the inability to attract and retain qualified
relationship managers in the future could affect our ability to operate effectively; (25) the
network and computer systems on which we depend could fail or experience a security breach; (26)
our loans are geographically concentrated in only a few states; (27) we are subject to
environmental liability risk associated with lending activities; (28) severe weather, natural
disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other external events could significantly impact our
business; (29) general business, economic and political conditions may significantly affect our
earnings; (30) we are a controlled company that is exempt from certain New York Stock Exchange
corporate governance requirements; (31) our controlling stockholder has significant influence over
us, including control over decisions that require the approval of stockholders, whether or not such
decisions are in the best interests of other stockholders; and
(32) financial reform legislation
recently signed by the President will, among other things, eliminate the Office of Thrift
Supervision, tighten capital standards, create a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and
result in new laws and regulations that are expected to increase our costs of operations.
The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after
the date of such statements.
2
FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements of the Company are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
4
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash items |
|
$ |
52,867 |
|
|
$ |
73,019 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
702,251 |
|
|
|
1,009,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
755,118 |
|
|
|
1,082,489 |
|
Securities classified as trading |
|
|
487,370 |
|
|
|
330,267 |
|
Securities classified as available for sale |
|
|
544,474 |
|
|
|
605,621 |
|
Other investments restricted |
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
15,601 |
|
Loans available for sale ($1,692,286 and $1,937,171 at fair value
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
1,849,718 |
|
|
|
1,970,104 |
|
Loans held for investment ($14,935 and $11,287 at fair value at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
7,365,817 |
|
|
|
7,714,308 |
|
Less: allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(530,000 |
) |
|
|
(524,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment, net |
|
|
6,835,817 |
|
|
|
7,190,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
10,421,581 |
|
|
|
11,121,371 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
41,840 |
|
|
|
44,941 |
|
Repossessed assets, net |
|
|
198,230 |
|
|
|
176,968 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
373,443 |
|
|
|
373,443 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
234,880 |
|
|
|
239,318 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights at fair value |
|
|
473,724 |
|
|
|
649,133 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights, net |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,896,175 |
|
|
|
1,331,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,693,830 |
|
|
$ |
14,013,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
8,254,046 |
|
|
$ |
8,778,469 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
3,650,000 |
|
|
|
3,900,000 |
|
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,000 |
|
Long term debt |
|
|
248,635 |
|
|
|
300,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
12,152,681 |
|
|
|
13,086,651 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
25,117 |
|
|
|
26,086 |
|
Secondary market reserve |
|
|
76,000 |
|
|
|
66,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
363,671 |
|
|
|
237,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
12,617,469 |
|
|
|
13,416,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies Note 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.01 par value, liquidation value $1,000 per share,
25,000,000 shares authorized; 266,657 issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Common stock $0.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized;
153,338,007 and 46,877,067 shares issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
Additional paid in capital preferred |
|
|
246,481 |
|
|
|
243,778 |
|
Additional paid in capital common |
|
|
1,077,244 |
|
|
|
447,449 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(23,282 |
) |
|
|
(48,263 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(225,618 |
) |
|
|
(46,712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,076,361 |
|
|
|
596,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
13,693,830 |
|
|
$ |
14,013,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
108,805 |
|
|
$ |
156,761 |
|
|
$ |
219,000 |
|
|
$ |
315,383 |
|
Securities classified as available for sale or trading |
|
|
20,735 |
|
|
|
30,659 |
|
|
|
36,102 |
|
|
|
56,136 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
130,022 |
|
|
|
187,848 |
|
|
|
256,228 |
|
|
|
372,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
41,521 |
|
|
|
66,547 |
|
|
|
83,407 |
|
|
|
133,897 |
|
FHLBI advances |
|
|
42,151 |
|
|
|
57,284 |
|
|
|
83,938 |
|
|
|
114,093 |
|
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
2,319 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
6,044 |
|
|
|
5,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
87,617 |
|
|
|
127,831 |
|
|
|
176,139 |
|
|
|
256,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
42,405 |
|
|
|
60,017 |
|
|
|
80,089 |
|
|
|
116,747 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
86,019 |
|
|
|
125,662 |
|
|
|
149,579 |
|
|
|
283,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(43,614 |
) |
|
|
(65,645 |
) |
|
|
(69,490 |
) |
|
|
(167,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan fees and charges |
|
|
20,236 |
|
|
|
35,022 |
|
|
|
36,565 |
|
|
|
67,944 |
|
Deposit fees and charges |
|
|
8,798 |
|
|
|
7,984 |
|
|
|
17,211 |
|
|
|
15,217 |
|
Loan administration |
|
|
(54,665 |
) |
|
|
41,853 |
|
|
|
(28,515 |
) |
|
|
10,053 |
|
Gain (loss) on trading securities |
|
|
69,660 |
|
|
|
(39,085 |
) |
|
|
66,348 |
|
|
|
(15,338 |
) |
Loss on residual and transferors interest |
|
|
(4,312 |
) |
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
|
|
(6,994 |
) |
|
|
(15,935 |
) |
Net gain on loan sales |
|
|
64,257 |
|
|
|
104,664 |
|
|
|
116,823 |
|
|
|
300,358 |
|
Net loss on sales of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
(1,266 |
) |
|
|
(2,544 |
) |
|
|
(3,479 |
) |
|
|
(2,626 |
) |
Net gain on securities available for sale |
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment gain (loss) |
|
|
11,274 |
|
|
|
8,461 |
|
|
|
36,796 |
|
|
|
(103,633 |
) |
Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income
before taxes |
|
|
11,665 |
|
|
|
8,788 |
|
|
|
40,473 |
|
|
|
(86,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
(3,677 |
) |
|
|
(17,569 |
) |
Other fees and charges |
|
|
(6,509 |
) |
|
|
(9,630 |
) |
|
|
(28,642 |
) |
|
|
(16,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
100,331 |
|
|
|
134,537 |
|
|
|
172,329 |
|
|
|
325,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation, commissions and benefits |
|
|
51,104 |
|
|
|
71,638 |
|
|
|
112,125 |
|
|
|
163,427 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
15,903 |
|
|
|
17,499 |
|
|
|
31,914 |
|
|
|
36,378 |
|
Asset resolution |
|
|
45,439 |
|
|
|
17,977 |
|
|
|
62,012 |
|
|
|
42,850 |
|
Federal insurance premiums |
|
|
10,640 |
|
|
|
16,612 |
|
|
|
20,688 |
|
|
|
20,848 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
Warrant (income) expense |
|
|
(3,486 |
) |
|
|
12,977 |
|
|
|
(2,259 |
) |
|
|
24,005 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
8,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
19,621 |
|
|
|
34,017 |
|
|
|
37,229 |
|
|
|
64,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
149,033 |
|
|
|
171,818 |
|
|
|
272,376 |
|
|
|
354,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before federal income taxes |
|
|
(92,316 |
) |
|
|
(102,926 |
) |
|
|
(169,537 |
) |
|
|
(196,120 |
) |
Benefit for federal income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
|
|
(92,316 |
) |
|
|
(71,665 |
) |
|
|
(169,537 |
) |
|
|
(136,163 |
) |
Preferred stock dividend/accretion |
|
|
(4,690 |
) |
|
|
(4,921 |
) |
|
|
(9,369 |
) |
|
|
(7,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
(97,006 |
) |
|
$ |
(76,586 |
) |
|
$ |
(178,906 |
) |
|
$ |
(144,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.63 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.63 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Capital - |
|
|
Capital - |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
(Accumulated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Deficit) |
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
119,776 |
|
|
$ |
(81,742 |
) |
|
$ |
434,175 |
|
|
$ |
472,293 |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136,163 |
) |
|
|
(136,163 |
) |
Reclassification of loss on
securities available for sale due
to other-than-temporary impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,420 |
|
Change in net unrealized loss on
securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,788 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,955 |
) |
Cumulative effect for adoption of FSP
FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,914 |
) |
|
|
32,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,494 |
|
Conversion of preferred stock |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
(268,574 |
) |
|
|
268,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to
management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,321 |
|
Reclassification of Treasury Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,673 |
|
Issuance of common stock for exercise
of May Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
Restricted stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,629 |
) |
|
|
(5,629 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458 |
|
Tax effect from stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
$ |
241,125 |
|
|
$ |
447,286 |
|
|
$ |
(96,448 |
) |
|
$ |
323,086 |
|
|
$ |
915,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
$ |
243,778 |
|
|
$ |
447,449 |
|
|
$ |
(48,263 |
) |
|
$ |
(46,712 |
) |
|
$ |
596,724 |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,537 |
) |
|
|
(169,537 |
) |
Reclassification of gain on sale of
securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,278 |
) |
Reclassification of loss on securities
available for sale due to other-than-
temporary impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
Change in net unrealized loss on
securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144,556 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
626,913 |
|
Restricted stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,074 |
|
Tax effect from stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
246,481 |
|
|
$ |
1,077,244 |
|
|
$ |
(23,282 |
) |
|
$ |
(225,618 |
) |
|
$ |
1,076,361 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(169,537 |
) |
|
$ |
(136,163 |
) |
Adjustments to net loss to net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
149,579 |
|
|
|
283,876 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,314 |
|
|
|
11,957 |
|
(Decrease) increase in valuation allowance in mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
2,016 |
|
Loss on fair value of residential mortgage servicing rights net of hedging gains
(losses) |
|
|
153,672 |
|
|
|
13,887 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,074 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
(Gain) loss on interest rate swap |
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
227 |
|
Net loss on the sale of assets |
|
|
6,436 |
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
Net gain on loan sales |
|
|
(116,823 |
) |
|
|
(300,358 |
) |
Net loss on sales of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
3,479 |
|
|
|
2,626 |
|
Net gain on sale of securities classified as available for sale |
|
|
(6,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other than temporary impairment losses on securities classified as available for sale |
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
17,569 |
|
Net (gain) loss on trading securities |
|
|
(66,348 |
) |
|
|
15,338 |
|
Net loss on residual and transferor interest |
|
|
6,994 |
|
|
|
15,935 |
|
Proceeds from sales of loans available for sale |
|
|
10,179,349 |
|
|
|
16,761,330 |
|
Origination and repurchase of mortgage loans available for sale, net of principal repayments |
|
|
(10,197,955 |
) |
|
|
(18,692,067 |
) |
Purchase of trading securities |
|
|
(899,012 |
) |
|
|
(783,370 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of trading securities |
|
|
806,496 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
518,793 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(565,692 |
) |
|
|
(193,234 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable |
|
|
(969 |
) |
|
|
391 |
|
Net tax effect of stock grants issued |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
Increase (decrease) in liability for checks issued |
|
|
(4,657 |
) |
|
|
3,303 |
|
Increase (decrease) in federal income taxes payable |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(10,270 |
) |
Increase in other liabilities |
|
|
119,681 |
|
|
|
97,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(581,807 |
) |
|
|
(2,368,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in other investments |
|
|
13,650 |
|
|
|
(4,768 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
401,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net (purchase) repayment of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(153,071 |
) |
|
|
56,608 |
|
Proceeds from sales of portfolio loans |
|
|
(58,546 |
) |
|
|
29,961 |
|
Origination of portfolio loans, net of principal repayments |
|
|
127,234 |
|
|
|
325,416 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
Proceeds from the disposition of repossessed assets |
|
|
108,799 |
|
|
|
122,970 |
|
Acquisitions of premises and equipment, net of proceeds |
|
|
(4,451 |
) |
|
|
(7,724 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
112,848 |
|
|
|
27,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
547,567 |
|
|
|
551,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposit accounts |
|
|
(524,423 |
) |
|
|
1,629,668 |
|
Net decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(250,000 |
) |
|
|
(48,093 |
) |
Net decrease in security repurchase agreements |
|
|
(108,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net receipt of payments of loans serviced for others |
|
|
11,738 |
|
|
|
35,279 |
|
Net receipt of escrow payments |
|
|
7,423 |
|
|
|
20,356 |
|
Net tax benefit for stock grants issued |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(465 |
) |
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
|
|
(3,889 |
) |
Issuance of junior subordinated debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
544,365 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
576,913 |
|
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(293,131 |
) |
|
|
2,233,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(327,371 |
) |
|
|
417,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,082,489 |
|
|
|
506,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
755,118 |
|
|
$ |
924,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment transferred to repossessed assets |
|
$ |
279,955 |
|
|
$ |
333,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest payments made on deposits and other borrowings |
|
$ |
177,108 |
|
|
$ |
255,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income taxes paid |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification
of mortgage loans originated for investment to mortgage loans available for sale |
|
$ |
58,546 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of mortgage loans originated available for sale to held for investment loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recharacterization of mortgage loans available for sale to investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
159,422 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights resulting from sale or securitization of loans |
|
$ |
93,392 |
|
|
$ |
191,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of mandatory convertible participating voting preferred stock to common stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
271,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of convertible trust securities |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
9
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1 Nature of Business
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. (Flagstar or the Company), is the holding company for its principal
subsidiary, Flagstar Bank, FSB (the Bank), a federally chartered stock savings bank founded in
1987. With $13.7 billion in assets at June 30, 2010, Flagstar is the largest insured depository
institution headquartered in Michigan. Unless otherwise specified, references herein to the
Company shall include the business operations of the Company and the Bank.
The Companys principal business is obtaining funds in the form of deposits and wholesale
borrowings and investing those funds in single-family mortgages and other types of loans. Its
primary lending activity is the acquisition or origination of single-family mortgage loans. The
Company may also originate consumer loans, commercial real estate loans and non-real estate
commercial loans. The Company services a significant volume of residential mortgage loans for
others.
The Company sells or securitizes most of the mortgage loans that it originates and generally
retains the right to service the mortgage loans that it sells. These mortgage servicing rights
(MSRs) are occasionally sold by the Company in transactions separate from the sale of the
underlying mortgages. The Company may also invest in a significant amount of its loan production
to enhance the Companys leverage and to receive the interest spread between earning assets and
paying liabilities.
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Indianapolis and is subject to
regulation, examination and supervision by the Office of Thrift
Supervision (including any successors thereto OTS) and the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Banks deposits are insured by the FDIC through the
Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF).
Note 2 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated. The Companys 10 trust subsidiaries and four securitization trusts are
considered variable interest entities and are not consolidated in the Companys consolidated
financial statements because the Company is not the primary beneficiary of those entities. Prior
to January 1, 2010, the securitization trusts were not consolidated in the Companys consolidated
financial statements because they were qualified special purpose entities under FASB ASC Topic 860,
Transfers and Servicing. The concept of the special purpose entity was eliminated from ASC Topic
860 effective January 1, 2010. In addition, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to
conform to the current period presentation.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim information and in accordance
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (U.S. GAAP) for complete financial statements. The accompanying interim financial
statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of
normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The
results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. For further
information, reference should be made to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes
thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,
which are available on the Companys Investor Relations web page, at www.flagstar.com, and
on the website SEC, at www.sec.gov.
Note 3 Recent Developments
Reverse Stock Split
On May 27, 2010, the Companys board of directors authorized a one-for-ten reverse stock split
immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders at which the reverse stock split was
approved by its stockholders. The reverse stock split became effective on May 27, 2010. Unless
noted otherwise, all share-related amounts herein reflect the one-for-ten reverse stock split.
In connection with the reverse stock split, stockholders received one new share of common
stock for every ten shares held at the effective time. The reverse stock split reduced the number
of shares of outstanding common stock from approximately 1.53 billion to 153 million. The number
of authorized shares of common stock was reduced from 3 billion to 300 million. Proportional
adjustments were made to the Companys outstanding options, warrants and other securities entitling
10
their holders to purchase or receive shares of common stock. In lieu of fractional shares,
stockholders received cash payments for fractional shares that were
determined on the basis of the common stocks closing price on
May 26, 2010, adjusted for the reverse stock split. The reverse stock split did not negatively
affect any of the rights that accrue to holders of the Companys outstanding options, warrants and
other securities entitling their holders to purchase or receive shares of common stock, except to
adjust the number of shares relating thereto accordingly. For further information, please see
Note 15, Stockholders Equity and Loss per Common
Share.
Conversion of Convertible Trust Securities
On April 1, 2010, MP Thrift Investments, L.P. (MP Thrift) converted $50 million of 10%
convertible trust preferred securities due in 2039 into 6.25 million shares of the Companys common
stock (as adjusted for the reverse stock split). For further information on the conversion of the
convertible trust preferred securities, please see Note 15, Stockholders Equity and Loss Per Common Share.
Supervisory Agreements
On January 27, 2010, the Company and the Bank each entered into respective supervisory
agreements with the OTS (collectively, the Supervisory Agreements). The Company and the Bank
have taken numerous steps to comply with, and intend to comply in the future with, all of the
requirements of the Supervisory Agreements, and do not believe that the Supervisory Agreements will
materially constrain managements ability to implement its business plan. The Supervisory
Agreements will remain in effect until terminated, modified, or suspended in writing by the OTS,
and the failure to comply with the Supervisory Agreements could result in the initiation of further
enforcement action by the OTS, including the imposition of further operating restrictions and
result in additional enforcement actions against the Company.
Note 4. Recent Accounting Developments
ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosure about Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance For Credit Losses. This guidance requires an entity to provide
disclosures that facilitate the evaluation of the nature of credit risk inherent in the entitys
portfolio of financing receivables; how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the
allowance for doubtful accounts; and the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for
credit losses. To achieve those objectives, disclosures on a disaggregated basis must be provided
on two defined levels: (1) portfolio segment; and (2) class of financing receivable. This guidance
makes changes to existing disclosure requirements and includes additional disclosure requirements
relating to financing receivables. Short-term accounts receivable, receivables measured at fair
value or lower of cost or fair value and debt securities are exempt from this guidance. The
guidance pertaining to disclosures as of the end of a reporting period, and to disclosures about
activity that occurs during a reporting period, is effective December 15, 2010. The provisions of this guidance are not
expected to have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity.
ASU No. 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Scope Exception Related to Embedded
Credit Derivatives. ASU 2010-11 clarifies that the only form of an embedded credit derivative
which is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements must relate to the subordination
of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an
embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately
account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The provisions of ASU 2010-11 are effective for
the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2010 and are not
expected to have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity.
Note 5 Fair Value Accounting
The Company adheres to guidance related to fair value measurements and additional guidance for
financial instruments. This guidance establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance also establishes a uniform
definition of fair value. The definition of fair value under this guidance is market-based as
opposed to company-specific and includes the following:
|
|
|
Defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability, in either case through an orderly transaction between market
participants at a measurement date, and establishes a framework for measuring fair value; |
|
|
|
|
Establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement
date; |
11
|
|
|
Nullifies previous fair value guidance, which required the deferral of profit at
inception of a transaction involving a derivative financial instrument in the absence of
observable data supporting the valuation technique; |
|
|
|
|
Eliminates large position discounts for financial instruments quoted in active markets
and requires consideration of the companys creditworthiness when valuing liabilities; and |
|
|
|
|
Expands disclosures about instruments that are measured at fair value. |
The accounting guidance for financial instruments provides an option to elect fair value as an
alternative measurement for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized Company
commitments and written loan commitments not previously recorded at fair value. In accordance with
the provisions of this guidance, the Company applied the fair value option to certain
non-investment grade residual securities that arose from private-label securitizations.
Accordingly, these residual securities are classified as trading securities.
The Company applies the fair value measurement method for residential MSRs under guidance
related to servicing assets and liabilities. Management applies the fair value measurement method
of accounting for residential MSRs to be consistent with the fair value accounting method required
for its risk management strategy to economically hedge the fair value of these assets. Changes in
the fair value of MSRs, as well as changes in fair value of the related derivative and other
hedging instruments, are recognized each period within the combination of loan administration
income (loss) on the consolidated statement of operations and in gain (loss) on trading securities,
to the extent such instruments are held on the balance sheet.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company elected the fair value option for the majority of its
loans available for sale in accordance with the accounting guidance for financial instruments.
Only loans available for sale originated subsequent to January 1, 2009 were affected. Prior to the
Companys fair value election, loans available for sale were carried at the lower of aggregate cost
or estimated fair value; therefore, any increase in fair value to such loans was not realized until
such loans were sold. The effect on consolidated operations of this election amounted to recording
additional gains on loan sales of $43.8 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, based
upon an increase in fair value during the period rather than at a later time when the loans were
sold. See Note 7, Loans Available for Sale, for further information.
Determination of Fair Value
The Company has an established process for determining fair values. Fair value is based upon
quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is
based upon internally developed models that use primarily market-based or independently-sourced
market parameters, including interest rate yield curves and option volatilities. Valuation
adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These
adjustments include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, creditworthiness, liquidity and
unobservable parameters that are applied consistently over time. Any changes to the valuation
methodology are reviewed by management to determine appropriateness of the changes. As markets
develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more transparent, the Company expects to
continue to refine its valuation methodologies.
The methods described above may produce a fair value estimate that may not be indicative of
net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes
its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of
different methodologies or assumptions by other market participants to determine the fair value of
certain financial instruments could result in different estimates of fair values of the same
financial instruments as held by the Company at the reporting date.
Valuation Hierarchy
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures establishes a three-level
valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy favors the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date and
thereby favors use of Level 1 if appropriate information is available, and otherwise Level 2 and
finally Level 3 if Level 2 input is not available. The three levels are defined as follows.
|
|
|
Level 1 Fair value is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets in which the Company may participate. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Fair value is based upon quoted prices for similar (i.e., not identical)
assets and liabilities in active markets, and other inputs that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the
financial instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair value is based upon financial models using primarily unobservable inputs. |
A financial instruments categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input within the valuation hierarchy that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
12
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company for
instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation
hierarchy.
Assets
Securities classified as trading. These securities are comprised of U.S. government sponsored
agency mortgage-backed securities, United States Department of the Treasury (U.S. Treasury) bonds
and non-investment grade residual securities that arose from private-label securitizations of the
Company. The U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury bonds
trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices and are therefore classified within
the Level 1 valuation hierarchy. The non-investment grade residual securities do not trade in an
active, open market with readily observable prices and are therefore classified within the Level 3
valuation hierarchy. Under Level 3, the fair value of residual securities is determined by
discounting estimated net future cash flows using expected prepayment rates and discount rates that
approximate current market rates. Estimated net future cash flows include assumptions related to
expected credit losses on these securities. The Company maintains a model that evaluates the
default rate and severity of loss on the residual securities collateral, considering such factors
as loss experience, delinquencies, loan-to-value ratios, borrower credit scores and property type.
See Note 10, Private Label Securitization Activity for the key assumptions used in the residual
interest valuation process.
Securities classified as available for sale. These securities are comprised of U.S.
government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
(CMOs). Where quoted prices for securities are available in an active market, those securities
are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If such quoted market prices are not
available, then fair values are estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with
similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. Due to illiquidity in the markets, the Company
determined the fair value of certain non-agency securities using internal valuation models and
therefore classified them within the Level 3 valuation hierarchy as these models utilize
significant inputs which are unobservable.
Other investments-restricted. Other investments are primarily comprised of various mutual
fund holdings. These mutual funds trade in an active market and quoted prices are available.
Other investments are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Loans available for sale. At June 30, 2010, the majority of the Companys loans originated
and classified as available for sale were reported at fair value and classified as Level 2. The
Company estimates the fair value of mortgage loans based on quoted market prices for securities
backed by similar types of loans. Otherwise, the fair value of loans is estimated using discounted
cash flows based upon managements best estimate of market interest rates for similar collateral.
The Company generally estimated the fair value of mortgage loans based on quoted market prices for
securities backed by similar types of loans. Where quoted market prices were available, such
market prices were utilized as estimates for fair values. Otherwise, the fair values of loans were
estimated by discounting estimated cash flows using managements best estimate of market interest
rates, prepayment speeds and loss assumptions for similar collateral. At June 30, 2010, the
Company continued to have a relatively small number of loans which were originated prior to the
fair value election and accounted for at lower of cost or market. Loans as to which the Company
has the unilateral right to repurchase from certain securitization transactions are classified as
available for sale and accounted for at historical cost, based on current unpaid principal balance.
Loans held for investment. The Company generally does not record these loans at fair value on
a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for
loan losses is established. Loans are considered impaired if it is probable that payment of
interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Once a loan is identified as impaired, the fair value of the impaired loan is estimated
using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise
value and liquidation value or discounted cash flows. Impaired loans do not require an allowance
if the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such
loans. At June 30, 2010, substantially all of the impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair
value of the collateral rather than on discounted cash flows. If the fair value of collateral is
used to establish an allowance, the underlying impaired loan must be assigned a classification in
the fair value hierarchy. To the extent the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable
market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as a nonrecurring
Level 2 valuation.
Repossessed assets. Loans on which the underlying collateral has been repossessed are
adjusted to fair value less costs to sell upon transfer to repossessed assets. Subsequently,
repossessed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value, less anticipated
marketing and selling costs. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values
of the collateral or managements estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value
of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company
records the repossessed asset as a nonrecurring Level 2 valuation.
13
Mortgage Servicing Rights. The Company has obligations to service residential first mortgage
loans, and consumer loans (i.e. home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) and second mortgage loans
obtained through private-label securitization transactions). Residential MSRs are accounted for at
fair value on a recurring basis, while servicing rights associated with consumer loans are carried
at amortized cost and are periodically evaluated for impairment.
Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights. Management believes that the current market
for residential mortgage servicing rights is not sufficiently liquid to provide participants with
quoted market prices. Therefore, the Company uses an option-adjusted spread valuation approach to
determine the fair value of residential MSRs. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash
flows under multiple interest rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted
discount rates. The key assumptions used in the valuation of residential MSRs include mortgage
prepayment speeds and discount rates. Management periodically obtains third-party valuations of
the residential MSR portfolio to assess the reasonableness of the fair value calculated by its
internal valuation model. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, residential MSRs are
classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. See Note 11, Mortgage Servicing Rights for
the key assumptions used in the residential MSR valuation process.
Consumer Loan Servicing Rights. Consumer servicing assets are subject to periodic
impairment testing. A valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis using
interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and a
discount rate determined by management, is used in the completion of impairment testing. If the
valuation model reflects a value less than the carrying value, consumer servicing assets are
adjusted to fair value through a valuation allowance as determined by the model. As such, the
Company classifies consumer servicing assets subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as
Level 3 valuations.
Derivative Financial Instruments. Certain classes of derivative contracts are listed on an
exchange and are actively traded, and they are therefore classified within Level 1 of the valuation
hierarchy. These include U.S. Treasury futures, U.S. Treasury options and interest rate swaps.
The Companys forward loan sale commitments may be valued based on quoted prices for similar assets
in an active market with inputs that are observable and are classified within Level 2 of the
valuation hierarchy. Rate lock commitments are valued using internal models with significant
unobservable market parameters and therefore are classified within Level 3 of the valuation
hierarchy.
14
Liabilities
Warrants. Warrant liabilities are valued using a binomial lattice model and are classified
within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Significant assumptions include expected volatility, a
risk free rate and an expected life.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
The following tables presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, by caption on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition and by
the valuation hierarchy (as described above):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value in the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Financial Condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
487,370 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
487,370 |
|
|
|
|
Total securities classified as trading |
|
|
487,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as available for sale |
|
|
27,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517,407 |
|
|
|
544,474 |
|
Loans available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692,286 |
|
Loans held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,935 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473,724 |
|
|
|
473,724 |
|
Other investments-restricted |
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,160 |
|
|
|
46,160 |
|
Agency forwards |
|
|
14,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,373 |
|
U.S. Treasury futures |
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets |
|
|
18,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,160 |
|
|
|
65,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
|
535,359 |
|
|
|
1,707,221 |
|
|
|
1,037,291 |
|
|
|
3,279,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
Forward agency and loan sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,766 |
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
50,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,029 |
|
Warrant liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
53,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,882 |
|
|
|
|
Net assets and liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
535,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,653,602 |
|
|
$ |
1,037,291 |
|
|
$ |
3,225,989 |
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value in the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Financial Condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
328,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,210 |
|
|
|
|
Total securities classified as trading |
|
|
328,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
330,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as available for sale |
|
|
67,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,376 |
|
|
|
605,621 |
|
Loans available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,937,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,937,171 |
|
Loans held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,287 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649,133 |
|
|
|
649,133 |
|
Other investments-restricted |
|
|
15,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,061 |
|
|
|
10,061 |
|
Forward agency and loan sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,764 |
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,764 |
|
|
|
10,061 |
|
|
|
37,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
|
411,056 |
|
|
|
1,976,222 |
|
|
|
1,199,627 |
|
|
|
3,586,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747 |
|
Agency forwards |
|
|
29,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,883 |
|
U.S. Treasury futures |
|
|
19,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,345 |
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
|
49,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,975 |
|
Warrant liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
|
49,975 |
|
|
|
5,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,086 |
|
|
|
|
Net assets and liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
361,081 |
|
|
$ |
1,971,111 |
|
|
$ |
1,199,627 |
|
|
$ |
3,531,819 |
|
|
|
|
Changes in Level 3 fair value measurements
A determination to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy
is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement.
However, Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level
3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be
validated to external sources). Accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include
changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are included within the valuation
methodology. Also, the Company manages the risk associated with the observable components of Level
3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within Level
1 or Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy; these Level 1 and Level 2 risk management instruments are
not included below, and therefore the gains and losses in the tables herein do not reflect the
effect of the Companys risk management activities related to such Level 3 instruments.
16
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
The tables below include a rollforward of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (including the change in fair value) for
financial instruments classified by the Company within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and (Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to |
|
|
|
Fair Value, |
|
|
Total Realized/ |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Financial |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
January 1, |
|
|
Unrealized Gains/ |
|
|
Issuances and |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Instruments Held at |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Settlements, net |
|
|
Out of Level 3 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests (1) |
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
|
$ |
(2,057 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Securities classified as available for sale (2)(3) |
|
|
538,376 |
|
|
|
22,237 |
|
|
|
(43,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
517,406 |
|
|
|
25,914 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
649,133 |
|
|
|
(268,315 |
) |
|
|
92,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
|
10,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,199,627 |
|
|
$ |
(248,135 |
) |
|
$ |
85,798 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,037,290 |
|
|
$ |
25,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and (Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to |
|
|
|
Fair Value, |
|
|
Total Realized/ |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Financial |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
January 1, |
|
|
Unrealized Gains/ |
|
|
Issuances and |
|
|
In and/or |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Instruments Held at |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Settlements, net |
|
|
Out of Level 3 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests (1) |
|
$ |
24,808 |
|
|
$ |
(8,406 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,402 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Securities classified as available for
Sale (2) (3) |
|
|
563,083 |
|
|
|
15,769 |
|
|
|
(24,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
554,055 |
|
|
|
33,338 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
511,294 |
|
|
|
(44,343 |
) |
|
|
191,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
|
78,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,177,798 |
|
|
$ |
(36,980 |
) |
|
$ |
117,048 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,257,866 |
|
|
$ |
33,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Residual interests are valued using internal inputs supplemented by independent third party inputs. |
|
(2) |
|
Realized gains (losses), including unrealized losses deemed other-than-temporary and related to
credit issues, are reported in non-interest income. Unrealized gains (losses) are reported in
accumulated other comprehensive loss. |
|
(3) |
|
U.S. government agency securities classified as available for sale are valued predominantly using
quoted broker/dealer prices with adjustments to reflect for any assumptions a willing market
participant would include in its valuation. Non-agency securities classified as available for sale are valued using internal valuation models and pricing information from third parties. |
17
The Company also has assets that under certain conditions are subject to measurement at
fair value on a non-recurring basis. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost
or market and had a fair value below cost at the end of the period as summarized below:
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans held for investment |
|
$ |
396,046 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
396,046 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Repossessed assets |
|
|
198,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loan servicing rights |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
595,366 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
594,276 |
|
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans held for investment |
|
$ |
557,808 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
557,808 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Repossessed assets |
|
|
176,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loan servicing rights |
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
738,017 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
734,776 |
|
|
$ |
3,241 |
|
|
|
|
18
Required Financial Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The accounting guidance for financial instruments requires disclosures of the estimated fair
value of certain financial instruments and the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate
their fair values. Certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are excluded
from the scope of this guidance. Accordingly, the fair value disclosures required by this guidance
are only indicative of the value of individual financial instruments as of the dates indicated and
should not be considered an indication of the fair value of the Company.
The following table presents the carrying amount and estimated fair value of certain financial
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
755,118 |
|
|
$ |
755,168 |
|
|
$ |
1,082,489 |
|
|
$ |
1,082,489 |
|
Securities trading |
|
|
487,370 |
|
|
|
487,370 |
|
|
|
330,267 |
|
|
|
330,267 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
544,474 |
|
|
|
544,474 |
|
|
|
605,621 |
|
|
|
605,621 |
|
Other investments restricted |
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
15,601 |
|
|
|
15,601 |
|
Loans available for sale |
|
|
1,849,718 |
|
|
|
1,921,370 |
|
|
|
1,970,104 |
|
|
|
1,975,819 |
|
Loans held for investment, net |
|
|
6,835,817 |
|
|
|
6,783,607 |
|
|
|
7,190,308 |
|
|
|
7,120,802 |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
373,443 |
|
|
|
373,443 |
|
|
|
373,443 |
|
|
|
373,443 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
474,814 |
|
|
|
474,842 |
|
|
|
652,374 |
|
|
|
652,656 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits and savings accounts |
|
|
(1,824,019 |
) |
|
|
(1,724,121 |
) |
|
|
(1,900,855 |
) |
|
|
(1,799,776 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(3,385,350 |
) |
|
|
(3,478,430 |
) |
|
|
(3,546,616 |
) |
|
|
(3,643,218 |
) |
Government accounts |
|
|
(703,551 |
) |
|
|
(695,608 |
) |
|
|
(557,495 |
) |
|
|
(549,990 |
) |
National certificates of deposit |
|
|
(1,587,087 |
) |
|
|
(1,617,396 |
) |
|
|
(2,017,080 |
) |
|
|
(2,455,684 |
) |
Company controlled deposits |
|
|
(754,039 |
) |
|
|
(751,387 |
) |
|
|
(756,423 |
) |
|
|
(756,423 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
(3,650,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,922,183 |
) |
|
|
(3,900,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,136,489 |
) |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108,000 |
) |
|
|
(110,961 |
) |
Long term debt |
|
|
(248,635 |
) |
|
|
(96,196 |
) |
|
|
(300,182 |
) |
|
|
(284,464 |
) |
Warrant liabilities |
|
|
(2,852 |
) |
|
|
(2,852 |
) |
|
|
(5,111 |
) |
|
|
(5,111 |
) |
Derivative Financial Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward delivery contracts |
|
|
(50,766 |
) |
|
|
(50,766 |
) |
|
|
27,764 |
|
|
|
27,764 |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
46,160 |
|
|
|
46,160 |
|
|
|
10,061 |
|
|
|
10,061 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
|
(747 |
) |
U.S. Treasury and agency futures/forwards |
|
|
18,972 |
|
|
|
18,972 |
|
|
|
(49,228 |
) |
|
|
(49,228 |
) |
The methods and assumptions that were used to estimate the fair value of financial assets
and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are
discussed above. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value for
other financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and cash equivalents. Due to their short term nature, the carrying amount of cash and
cash equivalents approximates fair value.
Loans held for investment. The fair value of loans is estimated by using internally developed
discounted cash flow models using market interest rate inputs as well as managements best estimate
of spreads for similar collateral.
FHLB stock. No secondary market exists for FHLB stock. The stock is bought and sold at par
by the FHLB. Management believes that the recorded value is the fair value.
Deposit Accounts. The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts approximates the
carrying amount. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the
rates currently offered for certificates of deposits with
similar remaining maturities.
FHLB Advances. Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and
remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of the existing debt.
Security Repurchase Agreements. Rates currently available for repurchase agreements with
similar terms and
maturities are used to estimate fair values for these agreements.
19
Long Term Debt. The fair value of the long-term debt is estimated based on a discounted cash
flow model that incorporates the Companys current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
Note 6 Investment Securities
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, investment securities were comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government treasury bonds |
|
|
2019-2040 |
|
|
$ |
487,363 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
2038-2039 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
328,210 |
|
Non-investment grade residual interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities trading |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
487,370 |
|
|
$ |
330,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agencies |
|
|
2035-2037 |
|
|
$ |
517,407 |
|
|
$ |
538,376 |
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
2010-2040 |
|
|
|
27,067 |
|
|
|
67,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
544,474 |
|
|
$ |
605,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,951 |
|
|
$ |
15,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
Securities classified as trading are comprised of AAA-rated U.S. government sponsored agency
mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Treasury bonds, and non-investment grade residual interests from
private-label securitizations. U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities held in
trading are distinguished from available-for-sale based upon the intent of the Company to use them
as an economic offset against changes in the valuation of the MSR portfolio; however, these
securities do not qualify as an accounting hedge as defined in current accounting guidance for
derivatives and hedges.
For U.S. Treasury bonds and U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities held,
we recorded a gain of $66.3 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2010, of which $21.0
million was unrealized gain on securities held at June 30, 2010. For the six month period ended
June 30, 2009, we recorded a loss of $21.0 million, $39.1 million of which was unrealized loss on
agency mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2009.
The non-investment grade residual interests resulting from the Companys private label
securitizations were zero
at June 30, 2010 versus $2.1 million at December 31, 2009.
The fair value of residual interests is determined by discounting estimated net future cash
flows using discount rates that approximate current market rates and expected prepayment rates.
Estimated net future cash flows include assumptions related to expected credit losses on these
securities. The Company maintains a model that evaluates the default rate and severity of loss on
the residual interests collateral, considering such factors as loss experience, delinquencies,
loan-to-value ratios, borrower credit scores and property type.
The fair value of non-investment grade
residual securities classified as trading decreased as a result of the increase in the actual and
expected losses in the second mortgages and HELOCs that underlie these assets.
Available-for-Sale
Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses
reported as a component of other comprehensive loss to the extent they are temporary in nature or
other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) as to non-credit
related issues. If unrealized losses are, at any time, deemed to have arisen from OTTI, the credit
related portion is reported as an expense for that period. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
the Company had $544.5 million and $605.6 million, respectively, in securities classified as
available-for-sale which were comprised of U.S. government sponsored agency and non-agency
collateralized mortgage obligations.
20
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated fair value of U.S. government
sponsored agency and non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations classified as
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
594,315 |
|
|
$ |
679,872 |
|
Gross unrealized holding gains |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
2,118 |
|
Gross unrealized holding losses |
|
|
(50,593 |
) |
|
|
(76,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value |
|
$ |
544,474 |
|
|
$ |
605,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes by duration the unrealized loss positions, at June 30, 2010, on
these securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Loss Position with |
|
|
Unrealized Loss Position with |
|
|
|
Duration 12 Months and Over |
|
|
Duration Under 12 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Loss |
|
Type of Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored agency securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,458 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
605,225 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(50,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
605,225 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
(50,546 |
) |
|
$ |
25,458 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized loss on securities-available-for-sale amounted to $50.6 million on $630.7
million of principal of agency and non-agency CMOs at June 30,
2010. These securities consist of
interests in investment vehicles backed by mortgage loans.
An investment impairment analysis of these securities is triggered when the estimated market
value is less than amortized cost for an extended period of time, generally six months. Before an
analysis is performed, the Company also reviews the general market conditions for the specific type
of underlying collateral for each security; in this case, the mortgage market in general has
suffered from significant losses in value. With the assistance of third party experts as deemed
necessary, the Company models the expected cash flows of the underlying mortgage assets using
historical factors such as default rates, current delinquency rates and estimated factors such as
prepayment speed, default speed and severity speed. Next, the cash flows are modeled through the
appropriate waterfall for each tranche owned; in the case of CMOs the level of credit support provided by
subordinated tranches is included in the waterfall analysis. The resulting cash flow of principal
and interest is then utilized by management to determine the amount of credit losses by security.
The credit losses on the portfolio reflect the economic conditions present in the U.S.
over the course of the last two years. This includes high mortgage defaults, declines in
collateral values and changes in homeowner behavior, such as intentionally defaulting on a note due
to a home value worth less than the outstanding debt on the home (so-called strategic defaults.)
In the six month period ended June 30, 2010, additional OTTI due to credit losses on eight
investments with existing other-than-temporary impairment credit losses totaled $3.7 million while
additional OTTI due to credit loss was recognized on two securities that did not already have such
losses; all OTTI due to credit losses was recognized in current operations.
At
June 30, 2010, the Company had total other-than-temporary
impairments of $89.5
million on 12 securities in the available-for-sale portfolio with $38.9 million in total credit
losses recognized through operations. At December 31, 2009, the Company had total
other-than-temporary impairments of $111.6 million on 12 securities in the available-for-sale
portfolio with $35.3 million in total credit losses recognized through operations.
21
The
following table shows the activity for OTTI credit net loss for the six months ended June
30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions on |
|
|
Additions on |
|
|
Reduction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities with |
|
|
For Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
with No |
|
|
Previous OTTI |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Prior OTTI |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
with OTTI |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
$ |
(35,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(38,949 |
) |
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on the sale of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities
available for sale that are recently created with underlying mortgage products originated by the
Company are reported within net gain on loan sale. Securities in this category have typically
remained in the portfolio less than 90 days before sale. During the three months ended June 30,
2010, there was a $0.2 million gain on sales of $143.4 million of agency securities with underlying
mortgage products recently originated by the Bank compared with a $0.8 million gain on $45.2
million of sales during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. During the six months ended June 30,
2010, sales of agency securities with underlying mortgage products originated by the Bank were
$143.4 million resulting in $0.2 million of net gain on loan sale compared with a $12.0 million
gain on $462.5 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2009.
Gain (loss) on sales for all other available for sale securities types are reported in net
gain on sale of available for sales securities. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the
Company sold $198.2 million in agency and non-agency securities resulting in a net gain of $4.5
million versus the same period ended June 30, 2009 in which the Company sold no U.S. government
sponsored agency and non-agency securities available for sale. During the six month ended June 30,
2010, the Company sold $251.0 million of agency and non-agency securities resulting in a net gain
of $6.7 million versus no sales for the period ended June 30, 2009.
As of June 30, 2010, the aggregate amount of available-for-sale securities from each of the
following non-agency issuers was greater than 10% of the Companys stockholders equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
Name of Issuer |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Countrywide Home Loans |
|
$ |
190,260 |
|
|
$ |
179,396 |
|
Flagstar Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1 |
|
|
173,108 |
|
|
|
155,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
363,368 |
|
|
$ |
335,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investments Restricted
The Company has other investments in its insurance subsidiary which are restricted as to their
use. These assets are held in trust and can only be used to pay insurance claims in that subsidiary
arising from mortgage reinsurance agreements with certain mortgage insurance companies. These
securities had a fair value that approximates their recorded amount for each period presented.
During 2009, the Company executed commutation agreements with three of the four mortgage insurance
companies it had reinsurance agreements. Under each commutation agreement, the respective mortgage
insurance company took back the ceded risk (thus again assuming the entire insured risk)
and received rights to all of the related future premiums. In addition, the mortgage insurance
company received all the cash held in trust attributable to the related reinsurance arrangement.
The Company had securities related to its remaining reinsurance agreements of $2.0 million and
$15.6 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Note 7 Loans Available for Sale
The following table summarizes loans available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Mortgage loans |
|
$ |
1,849,710 |
|
|
$ |
1,970,104 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,849,718 |
|
|
$ |
1,970,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company elected to record new originations of loans available
for sale on the fair value method and as such no longer defers loan fees or expenses related to
these loans. Because the fair value method was required to be adopted prospectively, only loans
originated for sale on or after January 1, 2009 are affected. At June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, $1.7 billion and $1.9 billion of loans available for sale were recorded at fair value,
respectively. The Company estimates the fair value of mortgage loans based on quoted market prices
for securities backed by similar types of loans where quoted market prices were available.
If such market prices were not available, the fair values of loans were estimated by discounting estimated cash flows using
managements best estimate of market interest rates for similar collateral.
In addition, for certain loans sold to Ginnie Mae, the Company as the servicer, has the
unilateral right to repurchase, without Ginnie Maes prior authorization, any individual loan in a
Ginnie Mae securitization pool if that loan meets certain criteria, including being delinquent
greater than 90 days. Once the Company has the unilateral right to repurchase the delinquent loan,
the Company has effectively regained control over the loan and must under U.S. GAAP, re-recognize
the loan on its balance sheet, included in loans available for sale, and establish a corresponding repurchase liability on its balance sheet
regardless of the Companys intention to repurchase the loan. At June 30, 2010, the Companys
re-recognized loans and corresponding liability, included in other liabilities, was $121.2 million.
Note 8 Loans Held for Investment
Loans held for investment are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Mortgage loans |
|
$ |
4,614,822 |
|
|
$ |
4,990,994 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
196,702 |
|
|
|
221,626 |
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
1,439,324 |
|
|
|
1,600,271 |
|
Construction loans |
|
|
13,003 |
|
|
|
16,642 |
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
702,455 |
|
|
|
448,567 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
388,250 |
|
|
|
423,842 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
11,261 |
|
|
|
12,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,365,817 |
|
|
|
7,714,308 |
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(530,000 |
) |
|
|
(524,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,835,817 |
|
|
$ |
7,190,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six month period ended, June 30, 2010, the Company transferred $15.3 million
and $68.7 million, respectively in loans available for sale to loans held for investment. The
loans transferred were carried at fair value, and continue to be reported at fair value while
classified as held for investment.
Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
538,000 |
|
|
$ |
466,000 |
|
|
$ |
524,000 |
|
|
$ |
376,000 |
|
Provision charged to operations |
|
|
86,019 |
|
|
|
125,662 |
|
|
|
149,579 |
|
|
|
283,876 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(96,088 |
) |
|
|
(119,583 |
) |
|
|
(147,648 |
) |
|
|
(189,025 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
1,921 |
|
|
|
4,069 |
|
|
|
3,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
530,000 |
|
|
$ |
474,000 |
|
|
$ |
530,000 |
|
|
$ |
474,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were loans totaling $20.5 million and $2.0 million greater than 90 days past due that
were still accruing interest as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company may modify certain loans to retain customers or to maximize collection of the loan
balance. The Company has maintained several programs designed to assist borrowers by extending
payment dates or reducing the borrowers contractual payments. All loan modifications are made on a
case by case basis. Loan modification programs for borrowers
23
implemented during 2009 and 2010 have
resulted in a significant increase in restructured loans. These loans are classified as
troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) and are included in non-accrual loans if the loan was
non-accruing prior to the restructuring or if the payment amount increased significantly. These
loans will continue on non-accrual status until the borrower has established a willingness and
ability to make the restructured payments for at least six months. At June 30, 2010, TDRs totaled
$750.8 million of which $316.2 million were non-accruing.
Loans
on which interest accruals have been discontinued totaled approximately $1.0 billion at
June 30, 2010 and $940.8 million at June 30, 2009. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when any
portion of principal or interest is 90 days delinquent or earlier when concerns exist as to the
ultimate collection of principal or interest. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, the
accrued and unpaid interest is reversed and interest income is recorded only as collected. Loans
return to accrual status when principal and interest become current and are anticipated to be fully
collectible. Interest income is recognized on impaired loans using a cost recovery method unless
the receipt of principal and interest as they become contractually due is not in doubt. TDRs of
impaired loans that perform under the restructured terms will remain on non-accrual status until
the borrower has established a willingness and ability to make the restructured payment for at
least six months, after which they will begin to accrue interest, provided the loan continues to
perform according to its restructured terms. Interest that would have been accrued on non-accrual
loans totaled approximately $21.7 million and $18.0 million during the six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
A loan is impaired when it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made
in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The following table details
impaired loans by loan loss allowance allocation and interest earned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Impaired loans with no allowance for loan losses allocated (1) |
|
$ |
116,032 |
|
|
$ |
160,188 |
|
Impaired loans with allowance for loan losses allocated |
|
|
903,492 |
|
|
|
891,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,019,524 |
|
|
$ |
1,051,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of the allowance allocated to impaired loans |
|
$ |
197,179 |
|
|
$ |
172,741 |
|
Average investment in impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,042,684 |
|
|
$ |
796,112 |
|
Cash-basis interest income recognized during impairment (2) |
|
$ |
19,181 |
|
|
$ |
26,602 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes loans for which the principal balance has been
charged down to net realizable value. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which expected
discounted cash flows or the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs exceeded the
recorded investments in such loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes interest income recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and year ended December 31, 2009, respectively. |
At June 30, 2010, approximately 48.3% of the total impaired
loans were evaluated based on the fair value of related collateral.
24
Note 9 Pledged Assets
The Company has pledged certain securities and loans to collateralize security repurchase
agreements, lines of credit and/or borrowings with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the FHLB
of Indianapolis and other potential future obligations. The following table details pledged asset
by asset class, and the market value of pledged investments and the principal amount for pledged
loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities classified as trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government treasury bonds |
|
$ |
125,361 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,210 |
|
Securities classified as available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
47,213 |
|
Non-agencies collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
155,659 |
|
|
|
538,376 |
|
Loans held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
4,638,484 |
|
|
|
5,526,865 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
158,065 |
|
|
|
194,319 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
270,163 |
|
|
|
286,602 |
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
668,851 |
|
|
|
751,472 |
|
Government guaranteed repurchased Ginnie Mae loans |
|
|
649,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
6,667,367 |
|
|
$ |
7,673,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Private-label Securitization Activity
The Company has, in the past, securitized fixed and adjustable rate second mortgage loans and
home equity line of credit loans for sale in the non-agency secondary market. The Company acted as
the principal underwriter of the beneficial interests that were sold to investors. The financial
assets were derecognized when they were transferred to the securitization trust, which then issued
and sold mortgage-backed securities to third party investors. The Company relinquished control
over the loans at the time the financial assets were transferred to the securitization trust. The
Company typically recognized a gain on the sale on the transferred assets.
The Company retained interests in the securitized mortgage loans and trusts, in the form of
residual interests, transferors interests, and servicing assets. The residual interests represent
the present value of future cash flows expected to be received by the Company. Residual interests
are accounted for at fair value and are included as securities classified as trading in the
consolidated statement of financial condition. Any gains or losses realized on the sale of such
securities and any subsequent changes in unrealized gains and losses are reported in the
consolidated statement of operations. Transferors interests represent all of the remaining
interest in the assets within the securitization trust, which will equal the excess of the loan
pool balance over the note principal balance and are comprised of the overcollateralization amount
and any additional balance increase amount. Transferors interests are included in loans held for
investment in the consolidated statement of financial condition. Servicing assets represent the
present value of future servicing cash flows expected to be received by the Company. These
servicing assets are accounted for on an amortization method, and have been included in mortgage
servicing rights in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
The Company recorded $26.1 million in residual interests as of December 31, 2005, as a result
of its non-agency securitization of $600 million in home equity line of credit loans (the FSTAR
2005-1 HELOC Securitization). In addition, until March, 2008 each month draws on the home equity
lines of credit in the trust established in the FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC Securitization were
purchased from the Company by the trust, resulting in additional residual interests to the Company.
These residual interests are recorded as securities classified as trading and therefore
recorded at fair value. Any gains or losses realized on the sale of such securities and any
subsequent changes in unrealized gains and losses have been reported in the consolidated statement
of operations.
On April 28, 2006, the Company completed a guaranteed mortgage securitization transaction of
approximately $400.0 million of fixed second mortgage loans (the FSTAR 2006-1 Second Mortgage
Securitization) that the Company held at the time in its investment portfolio. The transaction
was treated as a recharacterization of loans held for investment to mortgage-backed securities held
to maturity and, therefore, no gain on sale was recorded.
25
The Company recorded $11.2 million in residual interests as of December 31, 2006, as a result
of its non-agency securitization of $302 million in home equity line of credit loans (the FSTAR
2006-2 HELOC Securitization). In addition, until November 2007, draws on the home equity lines of
credit in the trust established in the 2006 HELOC Securitization were
purchased from the Company by the trust, resulting in additional residual interests to the Company.
These residual interests were recorded as securities classified as trading and therefore recorded
at fair value. Any gains or losses realized on the sale of such securities and any subsequent
changes in unrealized gains and losses have been reported in the consolidated statement of
operations.
On March 15, 2007, the Company sold $620.9 million in closed-ended, fixed and adjustable rate
second mortgage loans (the FSTAR 2007-1 Second Mortgage Securitization) and recorded
$22.6 million in residual interests and servicing assets as a result of the non-agency
securitization. On June 30, 2007, the Company completed a secondary closing for $98.2 million and
recorded an additional $4.2 million in residual interests. The residual interests were categorized
as securities classified as trading and therefore recorded at fair value. Any gains or losses
realized on the sale of such securities and any subsequent changes in unrealized gains and losses
have been reported in the consolidated statement of operations.
During 2009 and for the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company did not engage in any
private-label securitization activity. At June 30, 2010, the Company had a zero balance of
residuals as compared to $2.1 million at December 31, 2009.
Summary of Securitization Activity
Certain cash flows received from the securitization trusts were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees received |
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
2,269 |
|
|
$ |
2,911 |
|
The following table sets forth certain characteristics of each of the securitizations at their
inception and the current characteristics as of and for the six month period ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-1 |
|
|
2006-2 |
|
|
HELOC Securitizations |
|
At Inception |
|
|
Current Levels |
|
|
At Inception |
|
|
Current Levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of loans |
|
|
8,155 |
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
4,186 |
|
|
|
2,733 |
|
Aggregate principal balance |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
158,077 |
|
|
$ |
302,182 |
|
|
$ |
171,664 |
|
Average principal balance |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
Weighted average fully
indexed interest rate |
|
|
8.43 |
% |
|
|
5.92 |
% |
|
|
9.43 |
% |
|
|
6.93 |
% |
Weighted average original term |
|
120 months |
|
120 months |
|
120 months |
|
120 months |
Weighted average remaining
term |
|
112 months |
|
61 months |
|
112 months |
|
74 months |
Weighted average original
credit score |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-1 |
|
|
2007-1 |
|
Second Mortgage Securitizations |
|
At Inception |
|
|
Current Levels |
|
|
At Inception |
|
|
Current Levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of loans |
|
|
8,325 |
|
|
|
4,022 |
|
|
|
12,416 |
|
|
|
7,829 |
|
Aggregate principal balance |
|
$ |
398,706 |
|
|
$ |
169,929 |
|
|
$ |
622,100 |
(1) |
|
$ |
349,518 |
|
Average principal balance |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
Weighted average fully indexed
interest rate |
|
|
7.04 |
% |
|
|
6.98 |
% |
|
|
8.22 |
% |
|
|
8.10 |
% |
Weighted average original term |
|
187 months |
|
187 months |
|
196 months |
|
194 months |
Weighted average remaining term |
|
179 months |
|
129 months |
|
185 months |
|
146 months |
Weighted average original credit score |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include prefunding amount of $98.2 million. |
26
Residual Interests
HELOC Securitizations
FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC Securitization. With respect to this securitization during the
three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company reduced to $0, the remaining residual
interest. At December 31, 2009, the Company carried residual interest of $2.1 million. This
transaction entered rapid amortization in the second quarter of 2008 as actual cumulative
losses exceeded predetermined thresholds.
During the rapid amortization period, the Company will no longer be reimbursed by the
trust for draws on the home equity lines of credit until after the bondholders are paid off and the
monoline insurer has been reimbursed for amounts it is owed. Upon entering the rapid amortization
period, the Company became obligated to fund the purchase of those additional balances as they
arise in exchange for a beneficial interest in the trust (i.e., a transferors interest). The
Company must continue to fund the required purchase of additional draws so as long as the
securitization remains active.
FSTAR 2006-2 HELOC Securitization. The fair value of the residual interest had been
written down to $0 since the third quarter of 2008. This transaction entered rapid
amortization in the fourth quarter of 2007, with the same effect as noted above.
Second Mortgage Securitizations
As of the second quarter 2009, there is no value in residual interest in the Companys two
second mortgage securitizations, FSTAR 2006-1 and FSTAR 2007-1.
At June 30, 2010 and 2009, key assumptions used in determining the value of residual interests
resulting from the securitizations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected |
|
|
Annual |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
at |
|
|
Prepayment |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Discount |
|
|
Average Life |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Speed |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC Securitization |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
12.47% |
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected |
|
|
Annual |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
at |
|
|
Prepayment |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Discount |
|
|
Average Life |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Speed |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC Securitization |
|
$ |
16,402 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
|
Transferors Interests
Under the terms of the HELOC securitizations, the trusts have purchased and were initially
obligated to pay for any subsequent additional draws on the lines of credit transferred to the
trusts. Upon entering a rapid amortization period, the Company becomes obligated to fund the
purchase of those additional balances as they arise in exchange for a beneficial interest in the
trust (transferors interest). The Company must continue to fund the required purchase of
additional draws by the trust (i.e., the draw contributions) as long as the securitization remains
active. The table below identifies the draw contributions for each of the HELOC securitization
trusts as well as the fair value of the transferors interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Transferors |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Interest by Securitization |
|
FSTAR 2005-1 |
|
|
FSTAR 2006-2 |
|
|
FSTAR 2005-1 |
|
|
FSTAR 2006-2 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total draw contribution |
|
$ |
32,974 |
|
|
$ |
50,009 |
|
|
$ |
30,256 |
|
|
$ |
48,105 |
|
Additional
balance increase amount (1) |
|
$ |
28,317 |
|
|
$ |
36,565 |
|
|
$ |
27,183 |
|
|
$ |
38,571 |
|
Transferors interest ownership percentage |
|
|
16.78 |
% |
|
|
20.16 |
% |
|
|
15.03 |
% |
|
|
18.39 |
% |
Fair value of transferors interests |
|
$ |
18,924 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,055 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Transferors interest reserve |
|
$ |
2,088 |
|
|
$ |
5,382 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,287 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Additional draws on lines of credit for which the Company receives a beneficial interest in
the trust. |
27
FSTAR
2005-1 HELOC Securitization. At June 30, 2010, outstanding claims due to the note
insurer were $3.7 million and based on the Companys internal model, the Company believed that
because of the claims due to the note insurer and continuing credit losses on the loans underlying
the securitization, the fair value/carrying amount of the transferors interest was $18.9 million.
Also, during the second quarter 2010, the Company determined that the transferors interests had
deteriorated to the extent that a contingent liability under SFAS 5 (now codified within ASC Topic
450, Contingencies,) liability was required to be recorded. During the period, the Company
recorded a liability to reflect the expected liability arising from losses on future draws
associated with this securitization, of which $2.1 million remained at June 30, 2010. In
determining this liability, the Company assumed (i) no further draws would be made with respect to
those HELOCs as to which further draws were currently prohibited, (ii) the remaining HELOCs would
continue to operate in the same manner as their historical draw behavior indicated, as measured on
an individual loan basis and on a pool drawdown basis, and (iii) that any draws actually made and
therefore recognized as transferors interests by the Company would have a loss rate of 31.4%.
There are two distinct components to the assumptions underlying the loss rate on
the transferors interests. First, the structure of the securitization provides for losses in the
transaction to be shared pari passu, i.e., equally, among the parties rather than being borne
solely or primarily by the Company. Second, to the extent that underlying claims to the insurer
increased concurrently with credit losses, the reimbursement owed to the insurer from the cash
payout structure (i.e., the waterfall) in the securitization also increased. During the second
quarter 2010, the combination of the excess spread, which is the difference between the coupon
rate of the underlying loans less the note rate paid to the bondholders, and the transferors
interests were insufficient to support the repayment of the insurers claims, and the assumed loss
rate increased to 31.4% giving rise to recording of the related liability at that time.
In order to estimate losses on future draws and the timing of such losses, a forecast for
the draw reserve was established. The forecast was used as the basis for recording the liability.
Historical observations and draw behavior formed the basis for establishing the key assumptions and
forecasted draw reserve.
First, the forecast assumed a 31.4% loss on all future draws. Second, the forecast projected
future obligations on a monthly basis using a three-month rolling average of the actual draws as a
percentage of the unfunded balance. For example, for the period ended June 30, 2010, the
three-month rolling average draw rate was 2.50% of the unfunded commitments (i.e., those still
active). This percentage was computed by dividing (i) the actual draw rate over the three month
period ending on that date, by (ii) the balance of the unfunded commitments still active on that
date. The draw rate was then used to project monthly draws through the remaining expected life of
the securitization. In doing so, the 2.50% draw rate (as noted above) was applied against the
expected declining level of unfunded commitments in future months caused by payoffs, credit
terminations and line cancellations. This rate of decline was based on historical experience within
the securitization pool of loans.
These calculations of future monthly draws comprise, in the aggregate, the total dollar
amount of expected future draws from the securitization pool. Despite a significant reduction in
the unfunded commitments, the Company has not observed a similar reduction in the actual draw rate.
Even with a constant draw rate, such total dollar amount declines to the extent the level of
unfunded commitments that are still active declines, as is the case in our forecast. Because the
expected loss on future draws on June 30, 2010 was 31.4%, the expected future draws equaled the
potential future draw liability at that date.
As indicated above, the forecast uses a constant draw rate as a percentage of the current
unfunded commitment that is based on historical observations and draw behavior. The forecast does
not contemplate current inactive accounts becoming active and thereby becoming eligible for draw
because the nature of the loans that do not currently generate transferors interests have
characteristics that suggest an extremely low likelihood of doing so in the future. Such loans are
those in which the draw feature has been discontinued pursuant to the terms of the underlying loan
agreement due to a credit-related deficiency of the borrower or due to a decline in the value of
the related residential property serving as collateral.
The forecast also reflects the low or zero draw rates of certain of the unfunded
commitments that are still active (i.e., $18.4 million for FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC Securitization. at
June 30, 2010). For instance, some loans are still active but have never been drawn upon,
suggesting that the loan may have been acquired at the time of a related first mortgage origination
solely for contingency purposes but without any actual intent to draw. Similarly, another group of
active loans were fully drawn upon at the time of the related first mortgage origination and have
been paid down over time, suggesting that the borrower intended the HELOC to serve more as a second
mortgage rather than as a revolving line of credit.
FSTAR 2006-2 HELOC Securitization. At June 30, 2010, outstanding claims due to the note
insurer were $57.8 million and based on the Companys internal model, the Company believed that
because of the claims due to the note insurer and continuing credit losses on the loans underlying
the securitization, the carrying amount of the transferors interest was $0. Also, during the
fourth quarter 2009, the Company determined that the transferors interests had deteriorated to the
extent that a contingent liability under SFAS 5 (now codified within ASC Topic 450,
Contingencies) liability was required to be recorded. During the period, the Company recorded a
liability of $7.6 million to reflect the expected liability arising from losses on future draws
associated with this securitization, of which $5.4 million remained at June 30, 2010. In
determining this liability, the Company (i) assumed no further draws would be made with respect to
those HELOCs as to which further draws were currently prohibited, (ii) the remaining HELOCs would
continue to operate in the same manner as their historical draw behavior indicated, as measured on
an individual loan basis and on a pool drawdown basis, and (iii) that any draws actually made and
therefore recognized as transferors interests by the Company would have a loss rate of 100%.
28
There are two distinct components to the assumptions underlying the loss rate on the
transferors interests. First, the
structure of the securitization provided for losses in the transaction to be shared pari
passu, i.e., equally, among the parties rather than being borne solely or primarily by the Company.
Second, to the extent that underlying claims to the insurer increased concurrently with credit
losses, the reimbursement owed to the insurer from the waterfall also increased. During the fourth
quarter 2009, the excess spread, the difference between the coupon rate of the underlying loans
less the note rate paid to the bondholders and the transferors interests were insufficient to
support the repayment of the insurers claims, and the assumed loss rate increased to 100%, giving
rise to our recording of the related liability at that time.
In order to estimate losses on future draws and the timing of such losses, a forecast for the
draw reserve was established. The forecast was used as the basis for recording the liability.
Historical observations and draw behavior formed the basis for establishing the key assumptions and
forecasted draw reserve.
First, the forecast assumed a 100% loss on all future draws. Second, the forecast projected
future obligations on a monthly basis using a three-month rolling average of the actual draws as a
percentage of the unfunded balance. For example, for the period ended June 30, 2010, the three-
month rolling average draw rate was 1.8% of the unfunded commitments (still active). This
percentage was computed by dividing (i) the actual draw rate over the three month period ending on
that date, by (ii) the balance of the unfunded commitments still active on that date. The draw
rate was then used to project monthly draws through the remaining expected life of the
securitization. In doing so, the 1.8% draw rate (as noted above) was applied against the expected
declining level of unfunded commitments in future months caused by payoffs, credit terminations and
line cancellations. This rate of decline was based on historical experience within the
securitization pool of loans.
These calculations of future monthly draws comprise, in the aggregate, the total dollar amount
of expected future draws from the securitization pool. Despite a significant reduction in the
unfunded commitments, the Company has not observed a similar reduction in the actual draw rate.
Even with a constant draw rate, such total dollar amount declines to the extent the level of
unfunded commitments that are still active declines, as is the case in our forecast. Because the
expected loss on future draws in June 2010 was 100%, the expected future draws equaled the
potential future draw liability at that date.
As indicated above, the forecast uses a constant draw rate as a percentage of the current
unfunded commitment that is based on historical observations and draw behavior. The forecast does
not contemplate current inactive accounts becoming active and thereby becoming eligible for draw
because the nature of the loans that do not currently generate transferors interests have
characteristics that suggest an extremely low likelihood of doing so in the future. Such loans are
those in which the draw feature has been discontinued pursuant to the terms of the underlying loan
agreement due to a credit-related deficiency of the borrower or due to a decline in the value of
the related residential property serving as collateral.
The forecast also reflects the low or zero draw rates of certain of the unfunded commitments
that are still active (i.e., $13.3 million for FSTAR 2006-2 HELOC Securitization at June 30, 2010).
For instance, some loans are still active but have never been drawn upon, suggesting that the loan
may have been acquired at the time of a related first mortgage origination solely for contingency
purposes but without any actual intent to draw. Similarly, another group of active loans was fully
drawn upon at the time of the related first mortgage origination and have been paid down over time,
suggesting that the borrower intended the HELOC to serve more as a second mortgage rather than as a
revolving line of credit.
The following table outlines the Companys expected losses on future draws on loans in FSTAR
2005-1 HELOC Securitization and FSTAR 2006-2 HELOC Securitization at June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Future |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Draws as % of |
|
|
Expected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential |
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
Future |
|
|
Expected |
|
|
Future |
|
|
|
Commitments (1) |
|
|
Commitments (2) |
|
|
Draws (3) |
|
|
Loss (4) |
|
|
Liability (5) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
FSTAR 2005 -1 HELOC Securitization |
|
$ |
18,443 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
$ |
6,651 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
% |
|
$ |
2,088 |
|
FSTAR 2006 -2 HELOC Securitization |
|
$ |
13,327 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
% |
|
$ |
5,382 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
31,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unfunded commitments represent the amounts currently fundable at the dates indicated because
the underlying borrowers lines of credit are still active. |
|
(2) |
|
Expected future draws on unfunded commitments represents the historical draw rate within the
securitization. |
|
(3) |
|
Expected future draws reflects unfunded commitments multiplied by expected future draws
percentage. |
|
(4) |
|
Expected losses represent an estimated reduction in carrying value of future draws. |
|
(5) |
|
Potential future liability reflects expected future draws multiplied by expected losses. |
29
Unfunded Commitments
The table below identifies separately for each HELOC trust: (i) the notional amount of the
total unfunded commitment under the Companys contractual arrangements, (ii) unfunded commitments
that have been frozen or suspended because the borrowers do not currently meet the contractual
requirements under their home equity line of credit with the Company, and (iii) the amount
currently fundable because the underlying borrowers lines of credit are still active:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
FSTAR 2005-1 |
|
|
FSTAR 2006-2 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Notional amount of unfunded commitments (1) |
|
$ |
41,270 |
|
|
$ |
38,321 |
|
|
$ |
79,591 |
|
Less: Frozen or suspended unfunded commitments |
|
$ |
22,827 |
|
|
$ |
24,994 |
|
|
$ |
47,821 |
|
Unfunded commitments still active |
|
$ |
18,443 |
|
|
$ |
13,327 |
|
|
$ |
31,770 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys total potential funding obligation is dependent on both (a) borrower
behavior (e.g., the amount of additional draws requested) and (b) the contractual draw period
(remaining term) available to the borrowers. Because borrowers can make principal payments and
restore the amounts available for draws and then borrow additional amounts as long as their
lines of credit remain active, the funding obligation has no specific limitation and it is not
possible to define the maximum funding obligation. However, we expect that the call provision
of the FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC and the FSTAR 2006-2 HELOC Securitization pools will be reached in
2015 and 2014, respectively, and our exposure will be substantially mitigated at such times,
based on prepayment speeds and losses in our cash flow forecast. |
Credit Risk on Securitization
With respect to the issuance of private-label securitizations, the Company retained certain
limited credit exposure in that it retained non-investment grade residual securities in addition to
customary representations and warranties. The Company does not have credit exposure associated
with non-performing loans in securitizations beyond its investment in retained interests in
non-investment grade residuals and in draws (transferors interests) on HELOCs that it funds and
which are not reimbursed by the respective trust. The value of the Companys transferors
interests reflects the Companys credit loss assumptions as to the underlying collateral pool. To
the extent that actual credit losses exceed the assumptions, the value of the Companys
unreimbursed draws will be diminished.
The following table summarizes the Companys consumer servicing portfolio and the balance of
retained assets with credit exposure, which includes residential interests that are included as
trading securities and unreimbursed HELOC draws that are included in loans held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Assets |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
With Credit |
|
Total Loans |
|
With Credit |
|
|
Serviced |
|
Exposure |
|
Serviced |
|
Exposure |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Private-label securitizations
|
|
$ |
849,187 |
|
|
$ |
18,924 |
|
|
$ |
949,677 |
|
|
$ |
21,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
849,187 |
|
|
$ |
18,924 |
|
|
$ |
949,677 |
|
|
$ |
21,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans that have been securitized in private-label securitizations at June 30,
2010 and 2009 that are sixty days or more past due and the credit losses incurred in the
securitization trusts are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Principal |
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
|
Credit Losses |
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
(Net of Recoveries) For the |
|
|
|
Loans Outstanding |
|
|
60 Days or More Past Due |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securitized mortgage loans |
|
$ |
849,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,062,567 |
|
|
$ |
63,461 |
|
|
$ |
54,757 |
|
|
$ |
61,950 |
|
|
$ |
78,112 |
|
30
Note 11 Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Company has obligations to service residential first mortgage loans and consumer loans
(HELOC and second mortgage loans resulting from private-label securitization transactions). A
description of these classes of servicing assets follows.
Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights. Servicing of residential first mortgage loans is a
significant business activity of the Company. The Company recognizes MSR assets on residential
first mortgage loans when it retains the obligation to service these loans upon sale. MSRs are
subject to changes in value from, among other things, changes in interest rates, prepayments of the
underlying loans and changes in credit quality of the underlying portfolio. In the past, the
Company treated this risk as a general counterbalance to the increased production and gain on loan
sale margins that tend to occur in an environment with increased prepayments. However, in 2008,
the Company elected the fair value option for its residential first mortgage servicing rights. As
such, the Company currently specifically hedges the risk of fair value changes of MSRs using
derivative instruments that are intended to change in value inversely to part or all of the changes
in the components underlying the fair value of MSRs.
Changes in the carrying value of residential first mortgage MSRs, accounted for at fair value,
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
649,133 |
|
|
$ |
511,294 |
|
Additions from loans sold with servicing retained |
|
|
93,392 |
|
|
|
191,258 |
|
Reductions from bulk sales |
|
|
(115,128 |
) |
|
|
(25,542 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payoffs(1) |
|
|
(31,392 |
) |
|
|
(72,208 |
) |
All other changes in valuation inputs or assumptions (2) |
|
|
(122,281 |
) |
|
|
53,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of MSRs at end of period |
|
$ |
473,724 |
|
|
$ |
658,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
49,536,021 |
|
|
$ |
60,468,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents decrease in MSR value associated with loans that were paid off during the period. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents estimated MSR value change resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates. |
The fair value of residential MSRs is estimated using a valuation model that calculates
the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration expected
mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors, which
are determined based on current market conditions. The Company periodically obtains third-party
valuations of its residential MSRs to assess the reasonableness of the fair value calculated by the
valuation model.
The key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value of MSRs capitalized during the
six month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Weighted-average constant prepayment rate |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
The key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value of MSRs at period end were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Weighted-average constant prepayment rate |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
31
Consumer Servicing Assets. Consumer servicing assets represent servicing rights related
to HELOC and second mortgage loans that were created in the Companys private-label
securitizations. These servicing assets are initially measured at fair value and subsequently
accounted for using the amortization method. Under this method, the assets are amortized in
proportion to and over the period of estimated servicing income and are evaluated for impairment on
a periodic basis. When the carrying value exceeds the fair value, a valuation allowance is
established by a charge against loan administration income in the consolidated statement of
operations.
The fair value of consumer servicing assets is estimated by using an internal valuation model.
This method is based on calculating the present value of estimated future net servicing cash
flows, taking into consideration discount rates, actual and expected loan prepayment rates,
servicing costs and other economic factors.
Changes in the carrying value of the consumer servicing assets and the associated valuation
allowance follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Consumer servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
7,049 |
|
|
$ |
9,469 |
|
Reduction from transfer of servicing (1) |
|
|
(5,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
(884 |
) |
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
|
|
|
Carrying value before valuation allowance at end of period |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
8,099 |
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
(3,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Impairment recoveries (charges) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(2,016 |
) |
Reduction from transfer of servicing (1) |
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,016 |
) |
|
|
|
Net carrying value of servicing assets at end of period |
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
|
$ |
6,083 |
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance of consumer loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
849,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,062,567 |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of servicing assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,523 |
|
|
$ |
12,284 |
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
|
$ |
7,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the transfer of mortgage servicing rights related to the FSTAR
2006-1 and FSTAR 2007-1 Second Mortgage
Securitizations initiated in June, 2010 and completed in July, 2010. |
The key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these servicing assets
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
Contractual Servicing Fees. Contractual servicing fees, including late fees and ancillary
income, for each type of loan serviced are presented below. Contractual servicing fees are
included within loan administration income on the consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate |
|
$ |
36,420 |
|
|
$ |
39,241 |
|
|
$ |
73,762 |
|
|
$ |
77,693 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
37,611 |
|
|
$ |
40,665 |
|
|
$ |
76,154 |
|
|
$ |
80,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Note 12 Other Assets
Other assets are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Repurchased assets with government insurance (1) |
|
$ |
1,362,519 |
|
|
$ |
826,349 |
|
Repurchased assets without government insurance |
|
|
27,985 |
|
|
|
45,697 |
|
Derivative assets, including margin accounts |
|
|
220,251 |
|
|
|
202,436 |
|
Escrow advances |
|
|
78,250 |
|
|
|
102,372 |
|
Tax assets, net |
|
|
79,425 |
|
|
|
77,442 |
|
Servicing
sales (2) |
|
|
12,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
115,575 |
|
|
|
77,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
1,896,175 |
|
|
$ |
1,331,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes $121.2 million of Ginnie Mae loans as to which the Company has the unilateral
right to repurchase and which are included in loans available for
sale, see Note 7, Loans Available for Sale. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects receivables on prior MSR servicing sales, pending
document delivery. |
Note 13 Income Taxes
The Companys net deferred tax asset position has been entirely offset by a valuation
allowance amounting to $260.0 million and $201.0 million, at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. A valuation allowance is established when management determines that it is more
likely than not that all or a portion of the Companys net deferred tax assets will not be realized
in future periods.
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, our net benefit for federal income taxes as a
percentage of pretax loss was 0% as compared to 30.4% for the comparable 2009 period. During the
three months ended June 30, 2010, the variance to the statutory rate of 35% was attributable to a
$32.8 million addition to our valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets, certain
non-deductible-corporate expenses of $0.7 million and non-deductible warrant expense of $(1.2)
million. The variance for the three months ended June 30, 2009 reflects certain non-deductible
corporate expenses of $0.2 million and non-deductible warrant expense of $4.5 million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our benefit for federal income taxes as a percentage
of pretax loss was 0% as compared to 30.6% for the comparable 2009 period. During the six months
ended June 30, 2010, the variance to the statutory rate was attributable to a $59.0 million
addition to our valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets, certain non-deductible-corporate
expenses of $1.0 million and non-deductible warrant expense of $(0.8) million. The variance for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects certain non-deductible corporate expenses of $0.3 million
and non-deductible warrant expense of $8.4 million.
The Companys income tax returns are subject to examination by federal, state and local
government authorities. On an ongoing basis, numerous federal, state and local examinations are in
progress and cover multiple tax years. As of June 30, 2010 , the Internal Revenue Service had
completed its examination of the Companys income tax returns through the years ended December 31,
2005 and is in process of examining income tax returns for years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, and
2008. The years open to examination by state and local government authorities vary by
jurisdiction.
Note 14 Warrant Liabilities
In full satisfaction of the Companys obligations under anti-dilution provisions applicable to
certain investors (the May Investors) in the Companys May 2008 private placement capital raise,
the Company granted warrants (the May Investor Warrants) to the May Investors on January 30, 2009
for the purchase of 1,425,979 of the Companys common stock at $6.20 per share. The holders of
such warrants are entitled to acquire the Companys common
shares for a period of ten years. During 2009, May Investor Warrants
to purchase 314,839 shares of the Companys common stock were
exercised. As a
result of the Companys registered offering on March 31, 2010, of 57.5 million shares of common stock at a price per
share of $5.00 (as adjusted for the subsequent one-for-ten reverse stock split), the number of
shares of the Companys common stock issuable to the May Investors under the May Investor Warrants
was increased by 266,674 and the exercise price was decreased to $5.00 pursuant to the anti-
dilution provisions of the May Investors Warrants. During the six-month period ended June 30,
2010, no shares of the Companys common stock were issued upon exercise of May Investor Warrants,
and at June 30, 2010, the May Investors held warrants to purchase 1,377,814 shares.
33
Management believes the May Investor Warrants do not meet the definition of a contract that is
indexed to the Companys own stock under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, the May Investor Warrants are
classified as liabilities rather than as an
equity instrument and are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through
operations.
On January 30, 2009, in conjunction with the capital investments, the Company recorded the May
Investor Warrants at their fair value of $6.1 million. From the issuance of the May Investor
Warrants on January 30, 2009 through June 30, 2010, the Company marked these warrants to market
which resulted in a decrease in the liability during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of
$3.2 million. This decrease was recorded as warrant income and included in non-interest expense as
a general and administrative expense. The Company will mark the May Investor Warrants to market
quarterly until exercised.
At June 30, 2010, the Companys liability to the May Investors warrant holders amounted to
$2.9 million. The warrant liabilities are included within other liabilities in the Companys
consolidated statement of financial condition.
On January 30, 2009, the Company sold to the U. S. Treasury, 266,657 shares of the Companys
fixed rate cumulative non-convertible perpetual preferred stock for $266.7 million, and a warrant
(the Treasury Warrant) to purchase up to approximately 6.5 million shares of the Companys common
stock at an exercise price of $6.20 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution and other
adjustments. The issuance and the sale of the preferred stock and Treasury Warrant were exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The preferred stock
qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative dividends quarterly at a rate of 5% per annum for
the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter. The Treasury Warrant became exercisable upon
receipt of stockholder approval on May 26, 2009 and has a 10 year term.
During the first quarter 2009, the Company recorded a Treasury Warrant liability that arose in
conjunction with the Companys participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) because
the Company did not have available an adequate number of authorized and unissued common shares. As
described in Note 15, Stockholders Equity, the Company initially recorded the Treasury Warrant
on January 30, 2009 at its fair value of $27.7 million. The warrant was marked to market on March
31, 2009 resulting in an increase to the warrant liability of $9.1 million. Upon stockholder
approval on May 26, 2009 to increase the number of authorized common shares, the Company marked the
liability to market at that date and reclassified the Treasury Warrant liability to additional paid
in capital. The mark to market on May 26, 2009 resulted in an increase to the warrant liability of
$12.9 million during the second quarter 2009. This increase was recorded as warrant expense and
included in non-interest expense under general and administrative.
Note 15 Stockholders Equity and Loss Per Common Share
On May 27, 2010, the Companys stockholders approved an amendment to the Companys Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of common stock with the exact
exchange ratio and timing of the reverse stock split to be determined at the discretion of the
Companys board of directors. The board of directors approved a one-for-ten reverse stock split
which became effective on May 27, 2010. In lieu of fractional shares, stockholders received cash
payments based on the common stocks closing price on May 26, 2010 of $5.00 per share, which
reflects the reverse stock split. The common stock par value remained at $0.01 per share. All
common stock and per share amounts in these consolidated financial statements and notes to the
consolidated financial statements are on an after-reverse-split basis for all periods presented.
Preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 and a liquidation value of $1,000, and additional
paid in capital attributable to preferred shares, at June 30, 2010 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earliest |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Redemption Date |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Series C, TARP Capital
Purchase Program |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
January 31, 2012 |
|
|
266,657 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
246,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
246,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On
April 1, 2010, MP Thrift converted the $50 million of
convertible trust preferred securities into
6,250,000 shares of the Companys common stock at the rate of $8.00 per share. The number of
shares of common stock issued for each convertible trust preferred security was equal to $1,000
divided by the adjusted stock price. The adjusted stock price was equal to 90% of the
volume-weighted average closing price of the Companys common stock from February 1, 2009 to April
1, 2010, subject to a floor of $8.00 per share, a ceiling of $20.00 per share and certain
adjustments as provided for in the trust agreement
..
34
On January 27, 2010, MP Thrift exercised its rights to purchase 42,253,521 shares of the
Company common stock for approximately $300 million in a rights offering to purchase up to
70,423,418 shares of common stock which expired on February 8, 2010. Pursuant to the rights
offering, each stockholder of record as of December 24, 2009 received 1.5023 non-
transferable subscription rights for each share of common stock owned on the record date and
entitled the holder to purchase one share of common stock at the subscription price of $7.10.
During the rights offering, the Company stockholders (other than MP Thrift) exercised their rights
to purchase 80,695 shares of common stock. In the aggregate, the Company issued 42,334,216 shares
of common stock in the rights offering for approximately $300.6 million.
On March 31, 2010, the Company completed a registered offering of 57.5 million shares of
common stock, which included 7.5 million shares issued pursuant to the underwriters over-allotment
option, that was exercised in full on March 29, 2010 at $5.00 per share. MP Thrift participated in
this registered offering and purchased 20 million shares at $5.00 per share. The offering resulted
in aggregate net proceeds to the Company of approximately $276.1 million, net of offering expenses.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table sets forth the ending balance in accumulated other comprehensive
loss for each component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale |
|
$ |
(23,282 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,263 |
) |
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
(23,282 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,263 |
) |
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the changes to other comprehensive (loss) income and the
related tax effect for each component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Gain (reclassified to earnings) on sales of securities
available for sale
(net of tax of $572 for the 2010 period) |
|
$ |
(6,278 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Loss (reclassified from retained earnings) for adoption of new
accounting guidance for investments debt and equity
securities other-than- temporary impairments
(net of tax of $17,724 for the 2009 period) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,914 |
) |
Loss (reclassified to earnings) for other-than-temporary
impairment of securities available for sale
(net of tax of $0 and $6,149, respectively, for the 2010 and
2009 periods) |
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
11,420 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale
(net of tax of $0 and $3,656, respectively, for the 2010 and
2009 periods) |
|
|
27,582 |
|
|
|
6,788 |
|
|
|
|
Change in comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
$ |
24,981 |
|
|
$ |
(14,706 |
) |
|
|
|
35
The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted loss per share of common
stock for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Average Shares |
|
|
Per Share Amount |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share Amount |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(92,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(71,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Less: Preferred stock
Dividend/accretion |
|
|
(4,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to
common stock |
|
|
(97,006 |
) |
|
|
153,298 |
|
|
|
(0.63 |
) |
|
|
(76,586 |
) |
|
|
23,943 |
|
|
|
(3.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to
common stock |
|
$ |
(97,006 |
) |
|
|
153,298 |
|
|
$ |
(0.63 |
) |
|
$ |
(76,586 |
) |
|
|
23,943 |
|
|
$ |
(3.20 |
) |
|
|
|
The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted loss per share of common stock
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Average Shares |
|
|
Per Share Amount |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Average Shares |
|
|
Per Share Amount |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(169,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(136,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Less: Preferred stock
Dividend/accretion |
|
|
(9,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to
common stock |
|
|
(178,906 |
) |
|
|
115,707 |
|
|
|
(1.55 |
) |
|
|
(144,004 |
) |
|
|
16,424 |
|
|
|
(8.77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to
common stock |
|
$ |
(178,906 |
) |
|
|
115,707 |
|
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
|
$ |
(144,004 |
) |
|
|
16,424 |
|
|
$ |
(8.77 |
) |
|
|
|
36
Due to the loss attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, the diluted loss per share calculation excludes all common stock equivalents, including
7,565,482 shares and 5,251,572 shares, respectively, pertaining to warrants and 840,145 shares and
14,671 shares, respectively, pertaining to stock-based awards. The
inclusion of these securities would be anti-dilutive.
Due to the loss attributable to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, the diluted loss per share calculation excludes all common stock equivalents, including
7,698,066 shares and 6,532,729 shares, respectively, pertaining to warrants and 779,613 shares and
14,276 shares, respectively, pertaining to stock-based awards. The inclusion of these securities
would be anti-dilutive.
Note 16 Derivative Financial Instruments
The following derivative financial instruments were identified and recorded at fair
value as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
- Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae and other forward loan sale contracts;
- Rate lock commitments;
- Interest rate swap agreements; and
- U.S. Treasury futures and options.
The Company hedges the risk of overall changes in the fair value of loans held for sale and
rate lock commitments generally by selling forward contracts on securities of Fannie Mae, Freddie
Mac and Ginnie Mae. The forward contracts used to economically hedge the loan commitments are
accounted for as non-designated hedges and naturally offset rate lock commitment mark-to-market
gains and losses recognized as a component of gain on loan sale. The Bank recognized a loss of
$25.4 million versus a gain of $8.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
respectively, on its hedging activity relating to loan commitments and loans held for sale. The
Company recognized a loss of $42.4 million and a gain of $15.3 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively, on its hedging activity relating to loans held for sale.
Additionally, the Company hedges the risk of overall changes in fair value of MSRs through the use
of various derivatives including purchase forward contracts on securities of Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac and the purchase/sale of U.S. Treasury futures contracts and options on U.S. Treasury futures
contracts. These derivatives are accounted for as non-designated hedges against changes in the
fair value of MSRs. The Company recognized a gain of $20.2 million and a loss of $60.4 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively, on MSR fair value hedging activities.
In addition, the Company recognized a gain of $49.8 million and a loss of $53.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, on MSR fair value hedging activities.
The Company occasionally uses interest rate swap agreements to reduce its exposure to
interest rate risk inherent in a portion of the current and anticipated borrowings and advances. A
swap agreement is a contract between two parties to exchange cash flows based on specified
underlying notional amounts and indices. Under U.S. GAAP, the swap agreements used to hedge the
Companys anticipated borrowings and advances qualify as cash flow hedges. Derivative gains and
losses reclassed from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income to current period operations
are included in the line item in which the hedge cash flows are recorded. On January 1, 2008, the
Company derecognized all cash flow hedges.
37
The Company had the following derivative financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Expiration |
|
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Dates |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
$ |
2,599,921 |
|
|
$ |
46,160 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury futures and agency forwards |
|
|
2,860,000 |
|
|
|
18,972 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivative Assets |
|
$ |
5,459,921 |
|
|
$ |
65,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward agency and loan sales |
|
$ |
3,787,139 |
|
|
$ |
50,766 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Borrowings and advances hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (LIBOR) |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivative Liabilities |
|
$ |
3,812,139 |
|
|
$ |
51,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Expiration |
|
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Dates |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
$ |
1,418,730 |
|
|
$ |
10,061 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Forward agency and loan sales |
|
|
3,007,252 |
|
|
|
27,764 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivative Assets |
|
$ |
4,425,982 |
|
|
$ |
37,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury futures and agency forwards |
|
$ |
4,900,000 |
|
|
$ |
49,228 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Borrowings and advances hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (LIBOR) |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivative Liabilities |
|
$ |
4,925,000 |
|
|
$ |
49,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets and derivative liabilities are contained on the Companys statement of
financial condition under the other assets and other liabilities captions, respectively.
Counterparty Credit Risk
The Bank is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to
its various derivative financial instruments. The Company manages this risk by selecting only
well-established, financially strong counterparties, spreading the credit risk among such
counterparties, and by placing contractual limits on the amount of unsecured credit risk from any
single counterparty.
Note 17 Segment Information
The Companys operations are comprised of two business segments: banking and home lending.
Each business operates under the same banking charter but is reported on a segmented basis for this
report. Each of the business lines is complementary to each other. The banking operation includes
the gathering of deposits and investing those deposits in duration-matched assets primarily
originated by the home lending operation. The banking group holds these loans in the investment
portfolio in order to earn income based on the difference or spread between the interest earned
on loans and the interest paid for deposits and other borrowed funds. The home lending operation
involves the origination, packaging, and sale of loans in order to receive transaction income. The
lending operation also services mortgage loans for others and sells MSRs into the secondary market.
Funding for the lending operation is provided by deposits and borrowings garnered by the banking
group. All of the non-bank consolidated subsidiaries are included in the banking segment. No such
subsidiary is material to the Companys overall operation.
38
Following is a presentation of financial information by business segment for the period
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Home Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
8,903 |
|
|
$ |
33,502 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42,405 |
|
(Loss) gain on sale revenue |
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
132,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,174 |
|
Other income (loss) |
|
|
13,267 |
|
|
|
(50,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and non-interest income |
|
|
26,693 |
|
|
|
116,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,736 |
|
(Loss) earnings before federal income taxes |
|
|
(139,000 |
) |
|
|
46,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,316 |
) |
Identifiable assets |
|
|
12,092,856 |
|
|
|
4,325,974 |
|
|
|
(2,725,000 |
) |
|
|
13,693,830 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
20,438 |
|
|
|
(20,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Home Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
28,429 |
|
|
$ |
31,588 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60,017 |
|
(Loss) gain on sale revenue |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
59,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,307 |
|
Other income |
|
|
36,608 |
|
|
|
38,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and non-interest income |
|
|
64,710 |
|
|
|
129,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,554 |
|
(Loss) earnings before federal income taxes |
|
|
(148,160 |
) |
|
|
45,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,926 |
) |
Identifiable assets |
|
|
14,496,674 |
|
|
|
5,931,618 |
|
|
|
(4,005,000 |
) |
|
|
16,423,292 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
30,038 |
|
|
|
(30,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Home Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
57,431 |
|
|
$ |
22,658 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
80,089 |
|
(Loss) gain on sale revenue |
|
|
6,689 |
|
|
|
179,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,381 |
|
Other income (loss) |
|
|
23,087 |
|
|
|
(37,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and non-interest income |
|
|
87,207 |
|
|
|
165,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,417 |
|
(Loss) earnings before federal income taxes |
|
|
(201,019 |
) |
|
|
31,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,537 |
) |
Identifiable assets |
|
|
12,092,856 |
|
|
|
4,325,974 |
|
|
|
(2,725,000 |
) |
|
|
13,693,830 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
41,063 |
|
|
|
(41,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Home Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
77,702 |
|
|
$ |
39,045 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
116,747 |
|
(Loss) gain on sale revenue |
|
|
(17,569 |
) |
|
|
266,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,889 |
|
Other income |
|
|
47,571 |
|
|
|
29,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and non-interest income |
|
|
107,704 |
|
|
|
334,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442,243 |
|
(Loss) earnings before federal income taxes |
|
|
(343,944 |
) |
|
|
147,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196,120 |
) |
Identifiable assets |
|
|
14,496,674 |
|
|
|
5,931,618 |
|
|
|
(4,005,000 |
) |
|
|
16,423,292 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
66,450 |
|
|
|
(66,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Revenues are comprised of net interest income (before the provision for loan losses) and
non-interest income. Non-interest expenses are fully allocated to each business segment. The
intersegment income (expense) consists of interest expense incurred for intersegment borrowing.
Note 18 Stock-Based Compensation
For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded stock-based
compensation expense of $1.6 million and $0.4 million ($0.2 million net of tax), respectively. For
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, stock-based compensation totaled $5.4 million and $0.5
million ($0.3 million net of tax), respectively.
Incentive Compensation Plan
The Incentive Compensation Plan (Incentive Plan) is administered by the compensation
committee of the board of directors. Each year the committee decides which employees of the
Company will be eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan and the size of the bonus pool. The
Company incurred expenses of $0.1 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The Company recorded income of $3.6 million and expense of $3.6 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Note 19 Contingencies and Commitments
The Company is involved in certain lawsuits incidental to its operations. Management, after
review with its legal counsel, is of the opinion that resolution of such litigation will not have a
material effect on the Companys consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or
liquidity.
A substantial part of the Companys business has involved the origination, purchase, and sale
of mortgage loans. During the past several years, numerous individual claims and purported consumer
class action claims were commenced against a number of financial institutions, their subsidiaries
and other mortgage lending institutions generally seeking civil statutory and actual damages and
rescission under the federal Truth in Lending Act, as well as remedies for alleged violations of
various state and federal laws, restitution or unjust enrichment in connection with certain
mortgage loan transactions.
The Company has a substantial mortgage loan-servicing portfolio and maintains escrow accounts
in connection with this servicing. During the past several years, numerous individual claims and
purported consumer class action claims were commenced against a number of financial institutions,
their subsidiaries and other mortgage lending institutions generally seeking declaratory relief
that certain of the lenders escrow account servicing practices violate the Real Estate Settlement
Practices Act and breach the lenders contracts with borrowers. Such claims also generally seek
actual damages and legal fees.
In addition to the foregoing, mortgage lending institutions have been subjected to an
increasing number of other types of individual claims and purported consumer class action claims
that relate to various aspects of the origination, pricing, closing, servicing, and collection of
mortgage loans that allege inadequate disclosure, breach of contract, or violation of state laws.
Claims have involved, among other things, interest rates and fees charged in connection with loans,
interest rate adjustments on adjustable rate loans, timely release of liens upon payoffs, the
disclosure and imposition of various fees and charges, and the placing of collateral protection
insurance.
While the Company has had various claims similar to those discussed above asserted against it,
management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of these claims will have a material
adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or
liquidity.
40
A summary of the contractual amount of significant commitments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commitments to extend credit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
$ |
2,599,921 |
|
|
$ |
1,418,730 |
|
HELOC trust commitments |
|
$ |
79,591 |
|
|
$ |
84,967 |
|
Standby and commercial letters of credit |
|
$ |
40,979 |
|
|
$ |
47,998 |
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend. Since many of these commitments expire
without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash
flow requirements. Certain lending commitments for mortgage loans to be sold in the secondary
market are considered derivative instruments in accordance with current accounting guidance.
Changes to the fair value of these commitments as a result of changes in interest rates are
recorded on the statement of financial condition in either other assets or other liabilities.
The Company enters into forward contracts for the future delivery or purchase of agency and
loan sale contracts related to its origination of residential mortgage loans. These contracts are
considered to be derivative instruments under current accounting guidance. Further discussion on
derivative instruments is included in Note 16, Derivative Financial Instruments.
The Company has unfunded commitments under its contractual arrangement with the HELOC
Securitization trusts to fund future advances on the underlying home equity lines of credit. In
addition, the Company retains certain limited credit exposure in relation to private-label
securitizations. Refer to further discussion of these issues as
presented in Note 10,
Private-label Securitization Activity.
Standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent
upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with
the third party, while commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce
and typically result in the commitment being drawn on when the underlying transaction is
consummated between the customer and the third party.
The credit risk associated with loan commitments and standby and commercial letters of credit
is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and is subject to normal
credit policies. Collateral may be obtained based on managements credit assessment of the
customer. We maintain a reserve (also know as guarantee liability)
for possible losses on these commitments, and which totaled $3.8 million at
June 30, 2010 and $4.5 million at December 31, 2009.
41
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Where
we say we, us, or our, we usually mean the Company. However, in some
cases, a reference to we, us, or our will include the Bank, and Flagstar Capital Markets
Corporation (FCMC), its wholly-owned subsidiary, which we collectively refer to as the Bank.
General
We are a Michigan-based savings and loan holding company founded in 1993. Our business is
primarily conducted through our principal subsidiary, the Bank, a federally chartered stock savings
bank. At June 30, 2010, our total assets were $13.7 billion, making us the largest publicly held
savings bank in the Midwest and one of the top 15 largest savings banks in the United States. We
are considered a controlled company for New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) purposes because MP Thrift
Investments, L.P. (MP Thrift) held approximately 80% of our voting common stock as of December
31, 2009 and approximately 69.1% as of June 30, 2010.
As a savings and loan holding company, we are subject to regulation, examination and
supervision by the OTS. The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Indianapolis and is subject to
regulation, examination and supervision by the OTS and the FDIC. The Banks deposits are insured
by the FDIC through the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF).
We operate 162 banking centers (of which 27 are located in retail stores), including 113
located in Michigan, 22 located in Indiana and 27 located in Georgia. Of these, 103 facilities are
owned and 59 facilities are leased. Through our banking centers, we gather deposits and offer a
line of consumer and commercial financial products and services to individuals and to small and
middle market businesses. We also gather deposits on a nationwide basis through our website,
FlagstarDirect.com, and provide deposit and cash management services to governmental units on a
relationship basis throughout our markets. We leverage our banking centers and internet banking to
cross sell other products to existing customers and increase our customer base. At June 30, 2010,
we had a total of $8.3 billion in deposits, including $5.2 billion in retail deposits, $0.7 billion
in government funds, $1.6 billion in wholesale deposits and $0.8 billion in company-controlled
deposits.
We also operate 22 stand-alone home loan centers located in 14 states, which originate
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans as part of our retail home lending business. These
offices employ approximately 157 loan officers. We also originate retail loans through referrals
from our 162 banking centers, consumer direct call center and our website, flagstar.com.
Additionally, we have wholesale relationships with approximately 2,800 mortgage brokers and nearly
1,100 correspondents, which are located in all 50 states and serviced by 139 account executives.
The combination of our retail, broker and correspondent channels gives us broad access to customers
across diverse geographies to originate, fulfill, sell and service our first mortgage loan
products. Our servicing activities primarily include collecting cash for principal, interest and
escrow payments from borrowers, and accounting for and remitting principal and interest payments to
investors and escrow payments to third parties. With over $9.8 billion in mortgage originations in
the first six months of 2010, we are ranked by industry sources as of June 30, 2010 as the
12th largest mortgage originator in the nation with a 1.6% market share.
Our earnings include net interest income from our retail banking activities, fee-based income
from services we provide our customers, and non-interest income from sales of residential mortgage
loans to the secondary market, the servicing of loans for others, and the sale of servicing rights
related to mortgage loans serviced for others. Approximately 99.9% of our total loan production
during the six months ended June 30, 2010 represented mortgage loans that were collateralized by
first or second mortgages on single-family residences and were eligible for sale through U.S.
government-sponsored entities, or GSEs (a term generally used to refer collectively or singularly
to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae).
At June 30, 2010, we had 3,181 full-time equivalent salaried employees of which 296 were
account executives and loan officers.
Critical Accounting Policies
Various elements of our accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to
estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. In particular, we
have identified three policies that, due to the judgment, estimates and assumptions inherent in
those policies, are critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements. These
policies relate to: (a) fair value measurements; (b) the determination of our allowance for loan
losses; and (c) the determination of our secondary market reserve. We believe the judgment,
estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are
appropriate given the factual circumstances at the time. However, given the sensitivity of our
consolidated financial statements to these critical accounting policies, the use of other
judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in material differences in our results of
operations and/or financial condition. For further information on our critical accounting
policies, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,
which is available on our website, www.flagstar.com, under the Investor Relations section, or on
the website of the SEC, at www.sec.gov.
42
Operating Segments
Our business is comprised of two operating segments banking and home lending. Our banking
operation currently offers a line of consumer and commercial financial products and services to
individuals and to small and middle market businesses. Our strategy provides that we will
significantly expand the offering of many of these products within our retail footprint, including
consumer loans, business loans and deposits, and cash management services. This expansion is
expected to occur through our network of bank branches and on-line services, as well as through
teams of business and middle market bankers. Our home lending operation originates, acquires, sells
and services mortgage loans on one-to-four family residences. Each operating segment supports and
complements the operations of the other, with funding for the home lending operation primarily
provided by deposits and borrowings obtained through the banking operation. Financial information
regarding our two operating segments is set forth in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. A discussion of our two
operating segments is set forth below.
Bank Operations. Our banking operation is composed of three delivery channels: Branch
Banking, Internet Banking and Government Banking.
|
|
|
Branch Banking consists of 162 banking centers located throughout Michigan and also in
Indiana (principally in the Indianapolis metropolitan area) and Georgia (principally in the
north Atlanta suburbs). |
|
|
|
Internet Banking is engaged in deposit gathering (principally money market deposit
accounts and certificates of deposits) on a nationwide basis, delivered primarily through
FlagstarDirect.com. |
|
|
|
Government Banking is engaged in providing deposit and cash management services to
governmental units on a relationship basis throughout key markets, including Michigan and
Indiana and, to a lesser degree, Georgia. |
In addition to deposits, we may borrow funds by obtaining advances from the FHLB of
Indianapolis or other federally backed institutions or by entering into repurchase agreements with
correspondent banks using as collateral our mortgage-backed securities that we hold as investments.
The banking operation may invest these funds in a variety of consumer and commercial loan
products.
Home Lending Operations. Our home lending operation originates, acquires, sells and
services one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. The origination or acquisition of
residential mortgage loans constitutes our most significant lending activity. At June 30, 2010, we
held approximately 62% of our interest-earning assets in first mortgage loans on single-family
residences.
During 2009 and continuing into 2010, we were one of the countrys leading mortgage loan
originators. We utilize three production channels to originate or acquire mortgage loans Retail,
Broker and Correspondent. Each production channel produces similar mortgage loan products and
applies, in most instances, the same underwriting standards. We expect to continue to leverage our
technology to streamline the mortgage origination process and bring service and convenience to our
brokers and correspondents. We maintain eight sales support offices that assist our brokers and
correspondents nationwide. We also continue to make increasing use of the Internet as a tool to
facilitate the mortgage loan origination process through our production channels. Our brokers,
correspondents and home loan centers are able to register and lock loans, check the status of
in-process inventory, deliver documents in electronic format, generate closing documents, and
request funds through the Internet. Virtually all mortgage loans that closed in 2010 used the
Internet in the completion of the mortgage origination or acquisition process.
|
|
|
Retail. In a retail transaction, we originate the loan through our nationwide network
of stand-alone home loan centers, as well as referrals from our 162 banking centers located
in Michigan, Indiana and Georgia and our national call center located in Troy, Michigan.
When we originate loans on a retail basis, we complete the origination documentation
inclusive of customer disclosures and other aspects of the lending process and fund the
transaction internally. At June 30, 2010, we maintained 22 stand-alone home loan centers.
In 2010, we expect to allocate additional, dedicated home lending resources towards
developing lending capabilities within our 162 banking centers and our consumer direct
channel. At the same time, we centralized our loan processing operations to gain
efficiencies and allow our lending staff to focus on originations. For the six months
ended June 30, 2010 we closed $855.4 million of loans utilizing this origination channel,
which equaled 8.7% of total originations as compared to $2.2 billion or 11.9% of total
originations for the same period in 2009. |
|
|
|
Broker. In a broker transaction, an unaffiliated mortgage brokerage company completes
the loan paperwork, but the loans are underwritten on a loan-level basis to our
underwriting standards and we supply the funding for the loan at closing (also known as
table funding) thereby becoming the lender of record. At closing, the broker may receive
an origination fee from the borrower and we may also pay the broker a premium to acquire
the loan. We currently have active broker relationships with over 2,800 mortgage brokerage
companies located in all 50 states. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we closed $3.4
billion utilizing this origination channel, which equaled 35.6% of total originations, as
compared to $8.2 billion or $43.8% for the same period in 2009. |
43
|
|
|
Correspondent. In a correspondent transaction, an unaffiliated mortgage company
completes the loan paperwork and
also supplies the funding for the loan at closing. We acquire the loan after the mortgage
company has funded the transaction, usually paying the mortgage company a market price for
the loan. Unlike several of our competitors, we do not generally acquire loans in bulk
amounts from correspondents but rather, we acquire each loan on a loan-level basis and
require that each loan be originated to our underwriting guidelines. We have active
correspondent relationships with over 1,100 companies, including banks and mortgage
companies, located in all 50 states. Over the years, we have developed what we believe to
be a competitive advantage as a warehouse lender, wherein we provide lines of credit to
mortgage companies to fund their loans. Warehouse lending is not only a profitable,
stand-alone business for us, but also provides valuable synergies with our correspondent
channel. In todays marketplace, there is high demand for warehouse lending, but we believe
that there are only a limited number of experienced providers. We believe that offering
warehouse lines has provided us a competitive advantage in the small to midsize
correspondent channel and has helped us grow and build out our correspondent business in a
profitable manner. For example, in 2010, our warehouse lines funded over 76% of the loans in
our correspondent channel. We plan to continue to leverage our warehouse lending for
customer retention throughout the remainder of 2010. For the six months ended June 30,
2010, we closed $5.4 billion utilizing the correspondent origination channel, which equaled
55.7% of total originations versus $8.3 billion or 44.3% originated for the same period in
2009. |
Underwriting. In past years, we originated a wide variety of residential mortgage loans, both
for sale and for our own portfolio, including fixed rate first and second lien mortgage loans,
adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs), interest only mortgage loans both ARM and fixed, and to a far
lesser extent, potential negative amortization payment option ARMs
(option power ARMs), subprime
loans, and home equity lines of credit (HELOCs). We also originated commercial real estate loans
for our own portfolio.
As a result of our increasing concerns about nationwide economic conditions, in 2007, we began
to reduce the number and types of loans that we originated for our own portfolio in favor of sale
into the secondary market. In 2008, we halted originations of virtually all types of loans for our
held-for-investment portfolio and focused on the origination of residential mortgage loans for
sale.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we primarily originated residential mortgage loans
for sale that conformed to the respective underwriting guidelines established by the U.S.
government sponsored agencies. Loans placed in the held-for-investment portfolio in the six months
ended June 30, 2010 would comprise either loans that were originated for Community Reinvestment Act
purposes, repurchased and performing at time of repurchase or, on a very limited basis, loans that
were originated to assist with the sale of our real estate owned (REO). During 2010, we would
expect to continue with the same mortgage origination offerings and have the same limited level of
loans placed into the held-for-investment portfolio.
First Mortgage Loans
At June 30, 2010, most of our held-for-investment mortgage loans were originated in prior
years with underwriting criteria that varied by product and with the standards in place at the time
of origination.
Set forth below is a table describing the characteristics of the first mortgage loans in our
held-for-investment portfolio at June 30, 2010, by year of origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
Year of Origination |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance(1) |
|
$ |
4,407,454 |
|
|
$ |
121,611 |
|
|
$ |
38,454 |
|
|
$ |
5,407 |
|
|
$ |
4,572,926 |
|
Average note rate |
|
|
5.34 |
% |
|
|
5.99 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
5.09 |
% |
|
|
5.36 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
Average original loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
74.8 |
% |
|
|
84.8 |
% |
|
|
89.2 |
% |
|
|
75.0 |
% |
|
|
75.1 |
% |
Average original combined loan-to- value ratio |
|
|
78.2 |
% |
|
|
85.8 |
% |
|
|
91.2 |
% |
|
|
80.5 |
% |
|
|
78.5 |
% |
Underwritten with low or stated income documentation |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
44
First mortgage loans are underwritten on a loan-by-loan basis rather than on a pool
basis. Generally, mortgage loans
produced through our production channels are reviewed by one of our in-house loan underwriters
or by a contract underwriter employed by a mortgage insurance company. However, a limited number
of our correspondents have been delegated underwriting authority but this has not comprised more
than 12% of the loans originated in any year. In all cases, loans must be underwritten to our
underwriting standards. Any loan not underwritten by our employees must be warranted by the
underwriters employer, which may be a mortgage insurance company or a correspondent mortgage
company with delegated underwriting authority. For further information, please refer to our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The following table identifies our held-for-investment mortgages by major category, at June
30, 2010. The housing price index (HPI) loan-to-value (LTV) is updated from the original LTV
based on Metropolitan Statistical Area-level Office of Federal
Housing Enterprise Oversight data as of March, 2010.
Within the first lien residential mortgage loan portfolio, high LTV loan originations, defined as
loans with a 95% LTV or greater at origination, comprised only 5.3% of our held-for-investment loan
portfolio. Our risk of loss on these loans is mitigated because private mortgage insurance was
obtained on the vast majority of loans with LTVs exceeding 80% at the time of origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
|
Average Note |
|
|
Average Original |
|
|
Average Original |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Average Updated |
|
|
|
Balance (1) |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
FICO Score |
|
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio |
|
|
(In Months) |
|
|
HPI-Based LTV Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1 ARM (2) |
|
$ |
222,981 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
% |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
74.4 |
% |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
85.0 |
% |
5/1 ARM (2) |
|
|
556,880 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
67.9 |
% |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
77.4 |
% |
7/1 ARM (2) |
|
|
69,044 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
69.6 |
% |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
86.1 |
% |
Other ARM |
|
|
104,623 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
% |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
75.9 |
% |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
% |
Other amortizing |
|
|
901,345 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
% |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
86.4 |
% |
Interest only: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1 ARM (2) |
|
|
348,785 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
% |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
75.6 |
% |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
88.1 |
% |
5/1 ARM (2) |
|
|
1,491,291 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
% |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
% |
7/1 ARM (2) |
|
|
122,659 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
% |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
% |
Other ARM |
|
|
75,148 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
% |
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
% |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
92.9 |
% |
Other interest only |
|
|
431,963 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
% |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
73.8 |
% |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
% |
Option ARMs |
|
|
242,947 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
77.1 |
% |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
104.5 |
% |
Subprime |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1 ARM (2) |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
% |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
91.2 |
% |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
116.7 |
% |
Other ARM |
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
6.95 |
% |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
85.9 |
% |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
108.4 |
% |
Other subprime |
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
6.74 |
% |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
82.2 |
% |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total first mortgage loans |
|
$ |
4,572,927 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
72.9 |
% |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
% |
Second mortgages |
|
$ |
196,469 |
|
|
|
8.30 |
% |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
%(3) |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
%(3) |
HELOCs |
|
$ |
275,473 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
%(3) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
%(3) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
|
(2) |
|
Hybrid ARMs are referred to by their initial fixed-rate and subsequent adjustable-rate
periods; for example, 3/1 describes an ARM with an initial 3-year fixed rate interest-rate
period and subsequent 1-year interest-rate adjustment periods. |
|
(3) |
|
Does not include underlying
1st
mortgage loan. |
45
The following table sets forth characteristics of those loans in our held-for-investment
mortgage portfolio, which includes first mortgages, second mortgages and HELOCs, as of June 30,
2010 that were originated with less documentation than is currently required. Loans as to which
underwriting information was accepted from a borrower without validating that particular item of
information is referred to as low doc or stated. Substantially all of those loans were
underwritten with verification of employment but with the related job income or personal assets, or
both, stated by the borrower without verification of actual amount. Those loans may have
additional elements of risk because information provided by the borrower in connection with the
loan was limited. Loans as to which underwriting information was supported by third party
documentation or procedures is referred to as full doc and the information therein is referred to
as verified. Also set forth are different types of loans that may have a higher risk of
non-collection than other loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low Doc |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
Held-for-Investment |
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
Balance (1) |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Characteristics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SISA (stated income, stated asset) |
|
|
16.93 |
% |
|
$ |
1,239,668 |
|
SIVA (stated income, verified assets) |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
$ |
185,025 |
|
High LTV (i.e., at or above 95%) |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
$ |
19,397 |
|
Second lien products (HELOCs, Second mortgages) |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
$ |
132,219 |
|
Loan types: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option ARM loans |
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
$ |
170,239 |
|
Interest-only loans |
|
|
14.55 |
% |
|
$ |
1,065,368 |
|
Subprime (2) |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
$ |
2,474 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes loans with a FICO score of less than 620. |
ARMs
ARM loans held for investment were originated using Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines
(i.e., the AUS guidelines) as a base framework, and the debt-to-income ratio guidelines and
documentation typically followed the AUS guidelines. Our underwriting guidelines were designed
with intent to minimize layered risk. The maximum ratios allowable for purposes of both the LTV
ratio and the combined loan to value ratio (CLTV), which includes second mortgages on the same
collateral, was 100%, but subordinate (i.e., second mortgage) financing was not allowed over a 90%
LTV ratio. At a 100% LTV ratio with private mortgage insurance, the minimum acceptable FICO score,
or the floor, was 700, and at lower LTV ratio levels, the FICO floor was 620. All occupancy and
specific-purpose loan types were allowed at lower LTVs. At times ARMs were underwritten at an
initial rate, also known as the start rate, that was lower than the fully indexed rate but only
for loans with lower LTV ratios and higher FICO scores. Other ARMs were either underwritten at the
note rate if the initial fixed term was two years or greater, or at the note rate plus two
percentage points if the initial fixed rate term was six months to one year.
Adjustable rate loans were not consistently underwritten to the fully indexed rate until the
Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Products issued by the federal banking regulatory
agencies was released in 2006. Teaser rates (i.e., in which the initial rate on the loan was
discounted from the otherwise applicable fully indexed rate) were only offered for the first three
months of the loan term, and then only on a portion of ARMs that had the negative amortization
payment option available and HELOCs. Due to the seasoning of our portfolio, all borrowers have
adjusted out of their teaser rates at this time.
Option power ARMs, which comprised 5.3% of the first mortgage portfolio as of June 30, 2010,
are adjustable rate mortgage loans that permit a borrower to select one of three monthly payment
options when the loan is first originated: (i) a principal and interest payment that would fully
repay the loan over its stated term, (ii) an interest-only payment that would require the borrower
to pay only the interest due each month but would have a period (usually 10 years) after which the
entire amount of the loan would need to be repaid (i.e., a balloon payment) or refinanced, and
(iii) a minimum payment amount selected by the borrower and which might exclude principal and some
interest, with the unpaid interest added to the balance of the loan (i.e., a process known as
negative amortization).
Option power ARMS were originated with maximum LTV and CLTV ratios of 95%; however,
subordinate financing was only allowed for LTVs of 80% or less. At higher LTV/CLTV ratios, the
FICO floor was 680, and at lower LTV levels the FICO floor was 620. All occupancy and purpose
types were allowed at lower LTVs. The negative amortization cap, i.e., the sum of a loans initial
principal balance plus any deferred interest payments, divided by the original principal balance of
the loan, was generally 115%, except that the cap in New York was 110%. In addition, for the first
five years, when the new monthly payment due is calculated every twelve months, the monthly payment
amount could not increase more than 7.5% from
46
year to year. By 2007, option power ARMs were underwritten at the fully indexed rate rather
than at a start rate. At June 30, 2010, we had $242.9 million of option power ARM loans in our
held-for-investment loan portfolio, and the amount of negative amortization reflected in the loan
balances at June 30, 2010 was $15.5 million. The maximum balance that all option power ARMs could
reach cumulatively is $325.4 million.
Set forth below is a table describing the characteristics of our ARM loans in our
held-for-investment mortgage portfolio at June 30, 2010, by year of origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
Year of Origination |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Unpaid principal balance (1) |
|
$ |
3,176,382 |
|
|
$ |
44,491 |
|
|
$ |
12,635 |
|
|
$ |
4,053 |
|
|
$ |
3,237,561 |
|
Average note rate |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
5.66 |
% |
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
4.94 |
% |
|
|
5.05 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
Average original loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
75.1 |
% |
|
|
80.5 |
% |
|
|
84.2 |
% |
|
|
73.3 |
% |
|
|
75.2 |
% |
Average original combined loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
79.0 |
% |
|
|
84.2 |
% |
|
|
91.6 |
% |
|
|
80.7 |
% |
|
|
79.1 |
% |
Underwritten with low or stated
Income documentation |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
Set forth below is a table describing specific characteristics of option power ARMs in
our held-for-investment mortgage portfolio at June 30, 2010, by year of origination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
Year of Origination |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance (1) |
|
$ |
242,947 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
242,947 |
|
Average note rate |
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720 |
|
Average original loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
72.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72.4 |
% |
Average original combined loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
76.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.5 |
% |
Underwritten with low or stated
income documentation |
|
$ |
170,239 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
170,239 |
|
Total principal balance with any
accumulated negative amortization |
|
$ |
228,454 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
228,454 |
|
Percentage of total ARMS with any
accumulated negative amortization |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
Amount of negative amortization
(i.e.,
deferred interest) accumulated as
interest income as of June 30,
2010 |
|
$ |
15,482 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,482 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
Set forth below are the accumulated amounts of interest income arising from the net
negative amortization portion of loans at June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance of |
|
|
Amount of Net Negative |
|
|
|
Loans in Negative Amortization |
|
|
Amortization Accumulated as |
|
|
|
at Period End (1) |
|
|
Interest Income During Period |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
242,947 |
|
|
$ |
15,482 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
282,817 |
|
|
$ |
15,702 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
116,862 |
|
|
$ |
5,704 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
47
Set forth below are the frequencies at which the ARM loans outstanding at June 30, 2010,
will reprice:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
% of the Total |
|
Reset frequency |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Monthly |
|
|
289 |
|
|
$ |
76,021 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Semi-annually |
|
|
5,913 |
|
|
|
2,072,189 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
% |
Annually |
|
|
4,612 |
|
|
|
794,145 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,814 |
|
|
$ |
2,942,355 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Set forth below as of June 30, 2010, are the amounts of the ARM loans in our
held-for-investment loan portfolio with interest rate reset dates in the periods noted. As noted
in the above table, loans may reset more than once over a three-year period. Accordingly, the
table below may include the same loans in more than one period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter |
|
|
2nd Quarter |
|
|
3rd Quarter |
|
|
4th Quarter |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
689,838 |
|
|
$ |
864,471 |
(2) |
|
$ |
886,630 |
|
|
$ |
941,496 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
915,883 |
|
|
$ |
987,842 |
|
|
$ |
933,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,020,800 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
1,021,534 |
|
|
$ |
1,212,815 |
|
|
$ |
1,198,708 |
|
|
$ |
1,204,578 |
|
Later years (1) |
|
$ |
2,453,707 |
|
|
$ |
2,552,228 |
|
|
$ |
2,564,276 |
|
|
$ |
2,549,378 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Later years reflect one reset period per loan. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Reflects loans that have reset through June 30, 2010. |
The ARM loans were originated with interest rates that are intended to adjust (i.e.,
reset or reprice) within a range of an upper limit, or cap, and a lower limit, or floor.
Generally, the higher the cap, the more likely a borrowers monthly payment could undergo a
sudden and significant increase due to an increase in the interest rate when a loan reprices. Such
increases could result in the loan becoming delinquent if the borrower was not financially prepared
at that time to meet the higher payment obligation. In the current lower interest rate
environment, ARM loans have generally repriced downward, providing the borrower with a lower
monthly payment rather than a higher one. As such, these loans would not have a material change in
their likelihood of default due to repricing.
Interest Only Mortgages
Both adjustable and fixed term loans were offered with a 10-year interest only option. These
loans were originated using Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines as a base framework. We
generally applied the debt-to-income ratio guidelines and documentation using the AUS
Approve/Accept response requirements. The LTV and CLTV maximum ratios allowable were 95% and each
100%, respectively, but subordinate financing was not allowed over a 90% LTV ratio. At a 95% LTV
ratio with private mortgage insurance, the FICO floor was 660, and at lower LTV levels, the FICO
floor was 620. All occupancy and purpose types were allowed at lower LTVs. Lower LTV and high
FICO ARMs were underwritten at the start rate, while other ARMs were either underwritten at the
note rate if the initial fixed term was two years or greater, and the note rate plus two percentage
points if the initial fixed rate term was six months to one year.
Set forth below is a table describing the characteristics of the interest-only mortgage loans
at the dates indicated in our held-for-investment mortgage portfolio at June 30, 2010, by year of
origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
Year of Origination |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Unpaid principal balance(1) |
|
$ |
2,446,933 |
|
|
$ |
20,396 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
1,686 |
|
|
$ |
2,469,846 |
|
Average note rate |
|
|
5.28 |
% |
|
|
6.15 |
% |
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
5.28 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
Average original loan-to-value
ratio |
|
|
74.6 |
% |
|
|
78.9 |
% |
|
|
78.0 |
% |
|
|
64.6 |
% |
|
|
74.7 |
% |
Average original combined
loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
79.1 |
% |
|
|
79.4 |
% |
|
|
78.0 |
% |
|
|
64.6 |
% |
|
|
79.1 |
% |
Underwritten with low or stated
income documentation |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
48
Second Mortgages
The majority of second mortgages we originated were closed in conjunction with the closing of
the first mortgages
originated by us. We generally required the same levels of documentation and ratios as with
our first mortgages. For second mortgages closed in conjunction with a first mortgage loan that
was not being originated by us, our allowable debt-to-income ratios for approval of the second
mortgages were capped at 40% to 45%. In the case of a loan closing in which full documentation was
required and the loan was being used to acquire the borrowers primary residence, we allowed a CLTV
ratio of up to 100%; for similar loans that also contained higher risk elements, we limited the
maximum CLTV to 90%. FICO floors ranged from 620 to 720, and fixed and adjustable rate loans were
available with terms ranging from five to 20 years.
Set forth below is a table describing the characteristics of the second mortgage loans in our
held-for-investment portfolio at June 30, 2010, by year of origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
Year of Origination |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Unpaid principal balance(1) |
|
$ |
179,807 |
|
|
$ |
14,620 |
|
|
$ |
1,719 |
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
$ |
196,469 |
|
Average note rate |
|
|
8.34 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
6.98 |
% |
|
|
7.06 |
% |
|
|
8.30 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
Average original
loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
Average original combined
loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
90.2 |
% |
|
|
79.6 |
% |
|
|
93.8 |
% |
|
|
91.3 |
% |
|
|
89.4 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
HELOCs
The majority of HELOC loans were closed in conjunction with the closing of related first
mortgage loans originated and serviced by us. Documentation requirements for HELOC applications
were generally the same as those required of borrowers for the first mortgage loans originated by
us, and debt-to-income ratios were capped at 50%. For HELOCs closed in conjunction with the
closing of a first mortgage loan that was not being originated by us, our debt-to-income ratio
requirements were capped at 40 to 45% and the LTV was capped at 80%. The qualifying payment varied
over time and included terms such as either 0.75% of the line amount or the interest only payment
due on the full line based on the current rate plus 0.5%. HELOCs were available in conjunction
with primary residence transactions that required full documentation, and the borrower was allowed
a CLTV ratio of up to 100%, for similar loans that also contained higher risk elements, we limited
the maximum CLTV to 90%. FICO floors ranged from 620 to 720. The HELOC terms called for monthly
interest-only payments with a balloon principal payment due at the end of 10 years. At times,
initial teaser rates were offered for the first three months.
Set forth below is a table describing the characteristics of the HELOCs in our
held-for-investment portfolio at June 30, 2010, by year of origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
Year of Origination |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Unpaid principal balance (1) |
|
$ |
252,929 |
|
|
$ |
21,888 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
275,473 |
|
Average note rate (2) |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
4.15 |
% |
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
5.49 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
Average original FICO score |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
Average original loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
Average original combined loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
81.9 |
% |
|
|
74.8 |
% |
|
|
77.4 |
% |
|
|
70.9 |
% |
|
|
81.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
|
(2) |
|
Average note rate reflects the rate in effect at June 30, 2010. As these loans adjust on a
monthly basis, the average note rate could increase, but would not decrease, as in the current
market, the floor rate on virtually all of the loans is in effect. |
49
Commercial Loans
Our commercial loan portfolio is primarily comprised of seasoned commercial real estate loans
that are collateralized by real estate properties intended to be income-producing in the normal
course of business. During 2006 and 2007, we placed an increased emphasis on commercial real
estate lending and on the expansion of our commercial lending business as a diversification from
our national residential mortgage lending platform. During 2008 and 2009, as a result of continued
economic and regulatory concerns, we funded commercial loans that had previously been underwritten
and approved but otherwise halted new commercial lending activity.
The primary factors considered in past commercial credit approvals were the financial strength
of the borrower, assessment of the borrowers management capabilities, industry sector trends, type
of exposure, transaction structure, and the general economic outlook. Commercial loans were made
on a secured, or in limited cases, on an unsecured basis, with a vast majority also being enhanced
by personal guarantees of the principals of the borrowing business. Assets used as collateral for
secured commercial loans required an appraised value sufficient to satisfy our loan-to-value ratio
requirements. We also generally required a minimum debt-service-coverage ratio, other than for
development loans, and considered the enforceability and collectability of any relevant guarantees
and the quality of the collateral.
As a result of the steep decline in originations, in early 2009, the commercial lending
division completed its transformation from a production orientation into one in which the focus is
on working out troubled loans, reducing classified assets and taking pro-active steps to prevent
deterioration in performing loans. Toward that end, commercial loan officers were largely replaced
by experienced workout officers and relationship managers. A comprehensive review, including
customized workout plans, were prepared for all classified loans, and risk assessments were
prepared on a loan level basis for the entire commercial real estate portfolio.
At June 30, 2010, our commercial real estate loan portfolio totaled $1.4 billion, or 20.0% of
our investment loan portfolio, and our non-real estate commercial loan portfolio was $11.3 million,
or 0.2% of our investment loan portfolio. At December 31, 2009, our commercial real estate loan
portfolio totaled $1.6 billion, or 22.3% of our investment loan portfolio, and our non-real estate
commercial loan portfolio was $12.3 million, or 0.2% of our investment loan portfolio. During
2010, we originated $1.4 million of new commercial loans versus zero for the same period in 2009.
At June 30, 2010, our commercial real estate loans were geographically concentrated in a few
states, with approximately $819.3 million (55.9%) of all commercial loans located in Michigan,
$197.2 million (13.5%) located in Georgia and $111.1 million (7.6%) located in California.
The average loan balance in our commercial real estate portfolio was approximately $1.8
million, with the largest loan being $41.9 million. At June 30, 2010, there were over 30
relationships, each with total loans over $10.0 million, and those loans comprised approximately
48.4% of the portfolio.
In commercial lending, ongoing credit management is dependent upon the type and nature of the
loan. We monitor all significant exposures on a regular basis. Internal risk ratings are assigned
at the time of each loan approval and are assessed and updated with each monitoring event. The
frequency of the monitoring event is dependent upon the size and complexity of the individual
credit, but in no case less frequently than every 12 months. Current commercial collateral values
are updated if deemed necessary as a result of impairments of specific loan or other credit or
borrower specific issues. We continually review and adjust our risk rating criteria and rating
determination process based on actual experience. This review and analysis process also
contributes to the determination of an appropriate allowance for loan loss amount for our
commercial loan portfolio.
We also continue to offer warehouse lines of credit to other mortgage lenders. These
commercial lines allow the lender to fund the closing of residential mortgage loans. Each
extension or drawdown on the line is collateralized by the residential mortgage loan being funded,
and in many cases, we subsequently acquire that loan. Underlying mortgage loans must be originated
based on our underwriting standards. These lines of credit are, in most cases, personally
guaranteed by one or more qualified principal officers of the borrower. The aggregate amount of
warehouse lines of credit granted to other mortgage lenders at June 30, 2010, was $1.5 billion, of
which $704.4 million was outstanding, as compared to $1.5 billion granted at December 31, 2009, of
which $448.6 million was outstanding.
50
The following table identifies our commercial loan portfolio by major category and selected
criteria at June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Loans on |
|
|
|
Balance (1) |
|
|
Note Rate |
|
|
Non-accrual Status |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
1,122,237 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
$ |
161,744 |
|
Adjustable rate |
|
|
313,639 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
144,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
1,435,876 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
$ |
306,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial non-real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
7,022 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,673 |
|
Adjustable rate |
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial non-real estate |
|
$ |
11,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse lines of credit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable rate |
|
$ |
704,416 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total warehouse lines of credit |
|
$ |
704,416 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unpaid principal balance does not include premiums or discounts. |
51
Selected Financial Ratios (Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Return on average assets |
|
|
(2.72 |
)% |
|
|
(1.83 |
)% |
|
|
(2.55 |
)% |
|
|
(1.76 |
)% |
Return on average equity |
|
|
(34.72 |
)% |
|
|
(33.30 |
)% |
|
|
(37.31 |
)% |
|
|
(33.45 |
)% |
Efficiency ratio |
|
|
104.4 |
% |
|
|
88.3 |
% |
|
|
107.9 |
% |
|
|
80.2 |
% |
Equity/assets ratio (average for the period) |
|
|
7.84 |
% |
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
Mortgage loans originated or purchased |
|
$ |
5,452,304 |
|
|
$ |
9,286,970 |
|
|
$ |
9,782,692 |
|
|
$ |
18,786,714 |
|
Other loans originated or purchased |
|
$ |
6,935 |
|
|
$ |
8,962 |
|
|
$ |
13,758 |
|
|
$ |
28,989 |
|
Mortgage loans sold and securitized |
|
$ |
5,259,830 |
|
|
$ |
9,878,035 |
|
|
$ |
10,274,578 |
|
|
$ |
17,577,097 |
|
Interest rate spread bank only (1) |
|
|
1.49 |
% |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
1.53 |
% |
Net interest margin bank only (2) |
|
|
1.53 |
% |
|
|
1.69 |
% |
|
|
1.48 |
% |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
Interest rate spread consolidated (1) |
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
1.42 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
Net interest margin consolidated (2) |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
Average common shares outstanding (3) |
|
|
153,298 |
|
|
|
23,943 |
|
|
|
115,707 |
|
|
|
16,424 |
|
Average fully diluted shares outstanding (3) |
|
|
153,298 |
|
|
|
23,943 |
|
|
|
115,707 |
|
|
|
16,424 |
|
Charge-offs to average investment loans (annualized) |
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Equity-to-assets ratio |
|
|
7.86 |
% |
|
|
7.71 |
% |
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|
5.57 |
% |
Core capital ratio (4) |
|
|
9.24 |
% |
|
|
9.39 |
% |
|
|
6.19 |
% |
|
|
7.19 |
% |
Total risk-based capital ratio (4) |
|
|
17.20 |
% |
|
|
17.98 |
% |
|
|
11.68 |
% |
|
|
13.67 |
% |
Book value per common share (3) |
|
$ |
5.28 |
|
|
$ |
5.70 |
|
|
$ |
7.00 |
|
|
$ |
13.80 |
|
Number of common shares outstanding (3) |
|
|
153,338 |
|
|
|
147,008 |
|
|
|
46,877 |
|
|
|
46,853 |
|
Mortgage loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
50,385,208 |
|
|
$ |
48,264,731 |
|
|
$ |
56,521,902 |
|
|
$ |
61,531,058 |
|
Capitalized value of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
Ratio of allowance to non-performing loans bank only |
|
|
52.3 |
% |
|
|
47.4 |
% |
|
|
48.9 |
% |
|
|
50.4 |
% |
Ratio of allowance to loans held for investment bank
only |
|
|
7.20 |
% |
|
|
7.10 |
% |
|
|
6.79 |
% |
|
|
5.63 |
% |
Ratio of non-performing assets to total assets bank only |
|
|
9.06 |
% |
|
|
9.30 |
% |
|
|
9.25 |
% |
|
|
6.67 |
% |
Number of banking centers |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Number of home lending centers |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Number of salaried employees |
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
2,927 |
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
Number of commissioned employees |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the annualized average yield earned on
average interest-earning assets for the period and the annualized average rate of interest paid
on average interest-bearing liabilities for the period. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest margin is the annualized effect of the net interest income divided by that
periods average interest-earning assets. |
|
(3) |
|
Restated for a one-for-ten reverse stock split announced and effective on May 27, 2010. |
|
(4) |
|
Based on adjusted total assets for purposes of tangible capital and core capital, and
risk-weighted assets for purposes of risk-based capital and total risk based capital.
These ratios are applicable to the Bank only. |
52
Results of Operations
Net Loss
Three Months. Net loss applicable to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30,
2010 was $97.0 million, $(0.63) per share-diluted, a $20.4 million increase from the loss of $76.6
million, $(3.20) per share-diluted, reported in the comparable 2009 period. The overall increase
resulted from a $17.6 million decrease in net interest income, a $34.2 million decrease in
non-interest income and a $31.3 million decrease in the benefit for income taxes, offset by a $39.7
million decrease in the provision for loan losses, a $22.8 million decrease in non-interest expense
and a decrease of $0.2 million preferred stock dividend/accretion.
Six Months. Net loss applicable to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2010
was $178.9 million, $(1.55) per share-diluted, a $34.9 million increase from the loss of $144.0
million, $(8.77) per share-diluted, reported in the comparable 2009 period. The overall increase
resulted from a $36.7 decrease in net interest income, a $153.2 million decrease in non-interest
income, a $59.9 million decrease in the benefit for income taxes and an increase of $1.5 million
preferred stock dividends/accretion, offset by a $134.3 million decrease in the provision for loan
losses and an $82.1 million decrease in non-interest expense.
Net Interest Income
Three Months. We recognized $42.4 million in net interest income for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, which represented a decrease of 29.3% compared to $60.0 million reported for the
same period in 2009. Net interest income represented 29.7% of our total revenue in 2010 as
compared to 30.8% in 2009. Net interest income is primarily the dollar value of the average yield
we earn on the average balances of our interest-earning assets, less the dollar value of the
average cost of funds we incur on the average balances of our interest-bearing liabilities. For
the three months ended June 30, 2010, we had an average balance of $11.6 billion of
interest-earning assets, of which $9.1 billion were loans receivable. Interest income recorded on
these loans is reduced by the amortization of net premiums and net deferred loan origination costs.
Interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $130.0 million, a decrease of 30.8%
from the $187.8 million recorded in 2009. Our interest income also includes the amount of negative
amortization (i.e., capitalized interest) arising from our option power ARM loans. The amount of
net negative amortization included in our interest income during the three month period ended June
30, 2010 and 2009 was $(0.2) million and $1.8 million, respectively. Offsetting the decrease in
interest income was a decrease in our cost of funds. The average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities decreased 61 basis points from 3.63% during 2009 to 3.02% in 2010, while the average
yield on interest-earning assets decreased 56 basis points (11.1%), from 5.05% during 2009 to 4.49%
in 2010. As a result, our interest rate spread was 1.47% at June 30, 2010. The Bank recorded a
net interest margin of 1.53% for the three months ended June 30,
2010, as compared to 1.69% for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Six Months. We recorded $80.1 million in net interest income before provision for loan losses
for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a 31.4% decrease from $116.7 million recorded for the
comparable 2009 period. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 we had an average balance of $11.5
billion of interest-earning assets, of which $9.0 billion were loans receivable. Interest income
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $256.2 million, a decrease of 31.3% from the $372.8
million recorded in the 2009 period. Our interest income also includes the amount of negative
amortization (i.e., capitalized interest) arising from our option power ARM loans, which totaled
$1.6 million and $52 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
decrease reflects a $116.6 million decrease in interest income offset by a $80.0 million decrease
in interest expense, primarily as a result of net interest earning assets decreasing by $0.6
billion. Additionally, our interest income has been adversely affected by a significant increase
in loans in which interest accruals have been discontinued. Offsetting the decrease in interest
income was a decrease in our cost of funds. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities
decreased 64 basis points to 3.03% at June 30, 2010 from 3.67% during 2009. As a result, our
interest rate spread was 1.44 at June 30, 2010. The Bank recorded a net interest margin of 1.48%
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as
compared to 1.68% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. See Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
53
The following table presents interest income from average earning assets, expressed in dollars
and yields, and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed in dollars and
rates on a consolidated basis rather than a bank-only basis. Interest income from earning assets
includes amortization of net premiums and net deferred loan origination costs of $(0.2) million and
$1.8 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $0.7 million
and $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available for sale |
|
$ |
1,675,502 |
|
|
$ |
20,927 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
$ |
3,533,219 |
|
|
$ |
45,245 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
% |
Loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
|
4,920,436 |
|
|
|
57,024 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
% |
|
|
5,943,876 |
|
|
|
76,439 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
Commercial Loans |
|
|
2,101,113 |
|
|
|
24,941 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
|
2,220,285 |
|
|
|
28,158 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
% |
Consumer Loans |
|
|
398,737 |
|
|
|
5,913 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
% |
|
|
517,762 |
|
|
|
6,919 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment |
|
|
7,420,286 |
|
|
|
87,878 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
% |
|
|
8,681,923 |
|
|
|
111,516 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
Securities classified as available for sale or
trading |
|
|
1,653,662 |
|
|
|
20,735 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
% |
|
|
2,402,234 |
|
|
|
30,659 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
820,379 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
233,324 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
% |
Other |
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
37,780 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
11,573,413 |
|
|
$ |
130,022 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
% |
|
|
14,888,480 |
|
|
$ |
187,848 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
% |
Other assets |
|
|
2,691,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,885,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
14,264,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,773,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
388,402 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
$ |
284,570 |
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
691,170 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
503,216 |
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
% |
Money market deposits |
|
|
562,442 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
699,866 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
% |
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
3,313,711 |
|
|
|
24,273 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
|
4,001,652 |
|
|
|
40,513 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail deposits |
|
|
4,955,725 |
|
|
|
27,719 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
5,489,304 |
|
|
|
46,103 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
Demand deposits |
|
|
392,054 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
|
49,979 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
68,722 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
83,780 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
% |
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
245,702 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
% |
|
|
811,647 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total government deposits |
|
|
706,478 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
% |
|
|
945,406 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
% |
Wholesale deposits |
|
|
1,628,940 |
|
|
|
12,738 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
1,955,966 |
|
|
|
18,197 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
7,291,143 |
|
|
|
41,521 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
8,390,676 |
|
|
|
66,547 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
3,891,758 |
|
|
|
42,151 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
% |
|
|
5,359,076 |
|
|
|
57,284 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
% |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
210,268 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
108,000 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
Other |
|
|
248,635 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
249,226 |
|
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
11,641,804 |
|
|
|
87,617 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
% |
|
|
14,106,978 |
|
|
|
127,831 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
% |
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,505,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,746,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,117,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
14,264,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,773,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
(68,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
781,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of average interest- earning assets to interest-
bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between rates of interest earned on interest-earning assets and rates of interest paid on
interest-bearing liabilities and 1.49% and 1.45% represent these rates at the Bank level for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets, and 1.53% and 1.69% represent these rates at the
Bank level for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available for sale |
|
$ |
1,598,996 |
|
|
$ |
39,855 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
$ |
3,194,965 |
|
|
$ |
81,443 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
% |
Loans held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
|
5,017,389 |
|
|
|
118,317 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
|
6,072,875 |
|
|
|
160,968 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
Commercial Loans |
|
|
2,029,418 |
|
|
|
48,794 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
2,285,294 |
|
|
|
59,088 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
% |
Consumer Loans |
|
|
407,286 |
|
|
|
12,035 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
526,944 |
|
|
|
13,884 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment |
|
|
7,454,093 |
|
|
|
179,146 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
8,885,113 |
|
|
|
233,940 |
|
|
|
5.28 |
% |
Securities classified as available for sale or
trading |
|
|
1,397,018 |
|
|
|
36,102 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
% |
|
|
2,113,762 |
|
|
|
56,136 |
|
|
|
5.33 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,013,450 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
229,652 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
% |
Other |
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
36,602 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
11,469,407 |
|
|
|
256,228 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
14,460,094 |
|
|
|
372,826 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
% |
Other assets |
|
|
2,545,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,942,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
14,014,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,402,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
379,260 |
|
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
% |
|
$ |
277,957 |
|
|
$ |
714 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
690,080 |
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
463,957 |
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
% |
Money market deposits |
|
|
572,091 |
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
|
657,777 |
|
|
|
6,743 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
% |
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
3,352,020 |
|
|
|
49,052 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
3,982,448 |
|
|
|
78,453 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail deposits |
|
|
4,993,451 |
|
|
|
55,701 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
5,382,139 |
|
|
|
89,842 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
Demand deposits |
|
|
342,254 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
% |
|
|
35,123 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
72,954 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
% |
|
|
82,025 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
% |
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
259,616 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
907,166 |
|
|
|
8,254 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total government deposits |
|
|
674,824 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
1,024,314 |
|
|
|
8,762 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
% |
Wholesale deposits |
|
|
1,709,241 |
|
|
|
25,765 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
1,985,111 |
|
|
|
35,293 |
|
|
|
3.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
7,377,516 |
|
|
|
83,407 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
8,391,564 |
|
|
|
133,897 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
3,895,856 |
|
|
|
83,938 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
% |
|
|
5,315,056 |
|
|
|
114,093 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
159,416 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
108,000 |
|
|
|
2,319 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
Other |
|
|
274,266 |
|
|
|
6,044 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
248,945 |
|
|
|
5,770 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
11,707,054 |
|
|
|
176,139 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
14,063,565 |
|
|
|
256,079 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
% |
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,348,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
959,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
861,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
14,014,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,402,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
(237,647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
80,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of average interest- earning assets to interest-
bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between rates of interest earned on interest-earning assets and rates
of interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities and 1.47% and 1.53% represent these rates at the Bank level for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets and 1.48% and 1.68%
represent these rates at the Bank level for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
55
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest
expense for the components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that are
presented in the preceding table. The table below distinguishes between the changes related to
average outstanding balances (changes in volume while holding the initial rate constant) and the
changes related to average interest rates (changes in average rates while holding the initial
balance constant). Changes attributable to both a change in volume and a change in rates were
included as changes in rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 Versus 2009 Increase |
|
|
|
(Decrease) Due to: |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available for sale |
|
$ |
(529 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,789 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,318 |
) |
Loans held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
(6,253 |
) |
|
|
(13,162 |
) |
|
|
(19,415 |
) |
Commercial loans |
|
|
(1,716 |
) |
|
|
(1,501 |
) |
|
|
(3,217 |
) |
Consumer loans |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
(1,599 |
) |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment |
|
|
(7,376 |
) |
|
|
(16,262 |
) |
|
|
(23,638 |
) |
Securities available for sale or trading |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(9,563 |
) |
|
|
(9,924 |
) |
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
Total other interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
(9,290 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,536 |
) |
|
$ |
(57,826 |
) |
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
(390 |
) |
Money market deposits |
|
|
(1,321 |
) |
|
|
(656 |
) |
|
|
(1,977 |
) |
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
(9,237 |
) |
|
|
(7,003 |
) |
|
|
(16,240 |
) |
|
|
\ |
Total retail deposits |
|
|
(11,575 |
) |
|
|
(6,809 |
) |
|
|
(18,384 |
) |
Demand deposits |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(1,414 |
) |
|
|
(1,523 |
) |
|
|
|
Total government deposits |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
Wholesale deposits |
|
|
(2,400 |
) |
|
|
(3,059 |
) |
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
(14,147 |
) |
|
|
(10,879 |
) |
|
|
(25,026 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
(15,737 |
) |
|
|
(15,133 |
) |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
(676 |
) |
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Other |
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
(14,700 |
) |
|
|
(25,514 |
) |
|
|
(40,214 |
) |
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
5,410 |
|
|
$ |
(23,022 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,612 |
) |
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 Versus 2009 Increase |
|
|
|
(Decrease) Due to: |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available for sale |
|
$ |
(905 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,683 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,588 |
) |
Loans held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
(14,673 |
) |
|
|
(27,978 |
) |
|
|
(42,651 |
) |
Commercial loans |
|
|
(3,693 |
) |
|
|
(6,601 |
) |
|
|
(10,294 |
) |
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
(3,179 |
) |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment |
|
|
(17,036 |
) |
|
|
(37,758 |
) |
|
|
(54,794 |
) |
Securities available for sale or trading |
|
|
(920 |
) |
|
|
(19,114 |
) |
|
|
(20,034 |
) |
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
(4,573 |
) |
|
|
4,414 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
(23,435 |
) |
|
$ |
(93,162 |
) |
|
$ |
(116,597 |
) |
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
(2,891 |
) |
|
|
1,932 |
|
|
|
(959 |
) |
Money market deposits |
|
|
(3,242 |
) |
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
|
(4,128 |
) |
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
(16,879 |
) |
|
|
(12,522 |
) |
|
|
(29,401 |
) |
|
|
|
Total retail deposits |
|
|
(22,927 |
) |
|
|
(11,214 |
) |
|
|
(34,141 |
) |
Demand deposits |
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
(5,941 |
) |
|
|
(7,248 |
) |
|
|
|
Total government deposits |
|
|
(1,874 |
) |
|
|
(4,948 |
) |
|
|
(6,822 |
) |
Wholesale deposits |
|
|
(4,583 |
) |
|
|
(4,945 |
) |
|
|
(9,528 |
) |
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
(29,384 |
) |
|
|
(21,107 |
) |
|
|
(50,491 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
(30,721 |
) |
|
|
(30,155 |
) |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
(771 |
) |
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Other |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
(29,778 |
) |
|
|
(50,161 |
) |
|
|
(79,939 |
) |
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
6,343 |
|
|
$ |
(43,001 |
) |
|
$ |
(36,658 |
) |
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
Three Months. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a provision for loan
losses of $86.0 million as compared to $125.7 million recorded during the same period in 2009. The
provisions reflect our estimates to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level to cover
probable losses inherent in the portfolio for each of the respective periods.
The provision recognized for the second quarter of 2010, which increased the allowance for
loan losses to $530.0 million at June 30, 2010 from $524.0 million at December 31, 2009, reflects
increases in historical loss rates, offset by the decrease in overall loan delinquencies (i.e., loans at least 30 days past due) to 16.42% at
June 30, 2010 as compared to 16.89% at December 31, 2009. Also, net charge-offs for the three
month period ended June 30, 2010 totaled $94.0 million as compared to $117.7 million for the same
period on 2009, resulting from lower levels of charge-offs for the three months ended June 30, 2010
as a percentage of the average loans held for investment, net of charge-off for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 decreased to 5.07% from 5.42% for the same period in 2009.
Six Months. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a provision for loan
losses of $149.6 million as compared to $283.9 million recorded during the same period in 2009.
The provisions reflect our estimates to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level to cover
probable losses inherent in the portfolio for each of the respective periods.
The provision recognized during 2010, which increased the allowance for loan losses to $530.0
million at June 30, 2010 from $524.0 million at December 31, 2009, reflects the decrease in overall
loan delinquencies (i.e., loans at least 30 days past due). Net charge-offs for the six month
period ended June 30, 2010 totaled $143.6 million as compared to $185.9 million for the same period in 2009, resulting from lower levels of charge-offs in commercial real estate.
As a percentage of the
57
average loans held for investment, net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased
to 3.85% from 4.18% for the same period in 2009.
See the section captioned Allowance for Loan Losses in this discussion for further analysis
of the provision for loan losses.
Non-Interest Income
Our non-interest income consists of (i) loan fees and charges, (ii) deposit fees and charges,
(iii) loan administration, (iv) net gain (loss) on loan sales, (v) net gain (loss) on sales of
MSRs, (vi) net gain (loss) on securities available for sale, (vii) gain (loss) on trading
securities, and (viii) other fees and charges. Our total non-interest income equaled $100.3
million during the three months ended June 30, 2010, which was a 25.4% decrease from the $134.5
million of non-interest income that we earned in the comparable 2009 period. During the six months
ended June 30, 2010, non-interest income decreased to $172.3 million from $325.5 million in the
comparable 2009 period.
Loan Fees and Charges. Both our banking operations and home lending operations earn loan
origination fees and collect other charges in connection with originating residential mortgages and
other types of loans.
Three Months. For the three month period ended June 30, 2010, we recorded loan fees and
charges of $20.2 million, a decrease of $14.8 million from the $35.0 million recorded for the
comparable 2009 period. The decreases in loan fees and charges resulted from decreases in the
volume of loans originated during the second quarter 2010, to $5.4 billion as compared to $9.3
billion during the same period in 2009. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (U.S. GAAP), loan origination fees generally are capitalized and added as an adjustment
to the basis of the individual loans originated. These fees are accreted into income as an
adjustment to the loan yield. Effective January 1, 2009, we elected to account for substantially
all of our mortgage originations as available-for-sale using the fair value method and therefore no
longer applied deferral of non-refundable fees and costs to those loans.
Six Months. Loan fees recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $36.6
million as compared to $67.9 million collected during the comparable 2009 period. The decrease of
$31.3 million, or 46.1%, in loan fees, reflects the decrease of 47.8% in the volume of loans
originated to $9.8 billion, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $18.8 billion in
the same period in 2009.
Deposit Fees and Charges. Our banking operation collects deposit fees and other charges such
as fees for non-sufficient funds, cashier check fees, ATM fees, overdraft protection, and other
account fees for services we provide to our banking customers. The amount of these fees tends to
fluctuate as a function of the increases or decreases in our deposit base.
Three Months. Total deposit fees and charges increased 5% during the three month period ended
June 30, 2010 to $8.8 million as compared to $8.0 million during comparable 2009 period. A
significant portion of this increase in deposit fees and charges was the result of a 15% increase
in debit card transaction volume. Our debit card fee income was $1.57 million and $1.24 million
during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively. Total number of customer
checking accounts increased from approximately 120,476 at June 30, 2009 to approximately 124,512 at
June 30, 2010.
Six Months. Total deposit fees and charges increased during the six month period ended June
30, 2010 to $17.2 million as compared to $15.2 million during the comparable 2009 period. A
significant portion of the increase in deposit fees and charges was the result of a 18% increase in
debit card transaction volume during the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Our debit card fee
income was $3.0 million and $2.4 million during the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Loan Administration. When our home lending operation sells mortgage loans in the secondary
market, it usually retains the right to continue to service these loans and earn a servicing fee,
also referred to herein as loan administration income. The majority of our MSRs are accounted for
on the fair value method. See Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item
1. Financial Statements herein.
58
The following table summarizes net loan administration income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Servicing income (loss) on consumer mortgage servicing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees, ancillary income and charges |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,392 |
|
|
$ |
2,940 |
|
Amortization expense consumer |
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
(884 |
) |
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
Impairment (loss) recovery consumer |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(2,016 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loan administration income (loss)
consumer |
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
Servicing income (loss) on residential mortgage servicing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees, ancillary income and charges |
|
|
36,420 |
|
|
|
39,241 |
|
|
|
73,762 |
|
|
|
77,693 |
|
Changes to fair value |
|
|
(112,201 |
) |
|
|
62,744 |
|
|
|
(153,672 |
) |
|
|
(13,887 |
) |
Gain (loss) on hedging activity |
|
|
20,151 |
|
|
|
(60,368 |
) |
|
|
49,823 |
|
|
|
(53,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loan administration income residential |
|
|
(55,630 |
) |
|
|
41,617 |
|
|
|
(30,087 |
) |
|
|
10,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan administration (loss) income (1) |
|
$ |
(54,665 |
) |
|
$ |
41,853 |
|
|
$ |
(28,515 |
) |
|
$ |
10,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loan administration income (loss) does not reflect the impact of mortgage backed
securities deployed as economic hedges of MSR assets. These positions, recorded as
securities-trading, provided $69.7 million in gains and $66.3 million in gains in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $39.1 million in
losses and $15.3 million in losses respectively, for the comparable 2009 periods.
These positions, which are on the balance sheet, also contributed an estimated $9.2
million and $3.5 million respectively, of net interest income in the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $17.6 million and $28.1 million, respectively,
during the corresponding periods of 2009. |
Three Months. Loan administration income decreased to a loss of $54.7 million for the
three month period ended June 30, 2010 from a gain of $41.9 million for the comparable 2009 period.
Servicing fees, ancillary income, and charges on our residential mortgage servicing decreased
during 2010 compared to 2009, primarily as a result of decreases in the average balance of our
loans serviced for others portfolio. The changes in fair value were due to a lowering rate
environment during the three month period ended June 30, 2010. The total unpaid principal balance
of loans serviced for others was $50.4 billion at June 30, 2010, versus $61.5 billion at June 30,
2009.
For consumer mortgage servicing, the decrease in the servicing fees, ancillary income and
charges for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 versus 2009 was due to the decrease in
consumer loans serviced for others. At June 30, 2010, the total unpaid principal balance of
consumer loans serviced for others was $0.8 billion versus $1.1 billion serviced at June 30, 2009.
The increase in impairment of $0.7 million was primarily the result of changes in delinquency
assumptions.
Six Months. Loan administration income decreased to a loss of $28.5 million for the six month
period ended June 30, 2010 from a gain of $10.1 million for the comparable 2009 period. Servicing
fees, ancillary income, and charges on our residential mortgage servicing decreased during 2010
compared to 2009, primarily as a result of decreases in the average balance of our loans serviced
for others portfolio. This decrease reflects the sale of servicing rights related to $10.8 billion
of loans serviced for others on a bulk basis and changes in fair value as a result of a lowering
rate environment during the six month period ending June 30, 2010. The total unpaid principal
balance of loans serviced for others was $50.4 billion at June 30, 2010, versus $61.5 billion at
June 30, 2009.
For consumer mortgage servicing, the decrease in the servicing fees, ancillary income and
charges for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 versus 2009 was due to the decrease in
consumer loans serviced for others. At June 30, 2010, the total unpaid principal balance of
consumer loans serviced for others was $0.8 billion versus $1.1 billion serviced at June 30, 2009.
The increase in impairment of $2.1 million was primarily the result of changes in delinquency
assumptions.
Gain (Loss) on Trading Securities. Generally, gain (loss) on trading securities are used to
offset the valuation changes to the MSRs as reflected in loan administration income. Securities
classified as trading are comprised of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities,
U.S. Treasury bonds and residual interests from private-label securitizations; losses from residual interests are classified separately in Loss on Residual and
Transferor Interests. U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities held in trading
are distinguished from available-for-sale based upon the intent of management to use them as an
economic hedge against changes in the valuation of the MSR portfolio; however, these securities do
not qualify as an accounting hedge as defined in current accounting guidance for derivatives and
hedges.
59
Three Months. During the second quarter of 2010, we recorded a gain on trading securities of
$69.7 million versus a loss of $39.1 million for the same period in 2009.
For U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities held, we recorded a gain of
$69.7 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2010, of which $24.8 million related to an
unrealized gain on agency mortgage backed securities held at June 30, 2010. For the same period in
2009, we recorded a loss of $39.1 million all of which was unrealized on agency mortgage backed
securities held at June 30, 2009.
Six Months. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a $66.3 million gain on
trading securities versus a loss of $15.3 million for the same period in 2009. The gain was
primarily due to changes in the value of trading agency mortgage backed securities held at June 30,
2010.
For U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities held, we recorded a gain of
$66.3 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, of which $21.0 million related to an
unrealized gain on agency mortgage backed securities held at June 30, 2010. For the same period in
2009, we recorded a loss of $15.3 million of which $39.1 million related to an unrealized loss on
agency mortgage backed securities held at June 30, 2009.
Loss on Residual Interests and Transferor Interests. Losses on residual interests classified
as trading and transferors interest are a result of a reduction in the estimated fair value of our
beneficial interests resulting from private securitizations. The losses in 2010 and 2009 are
primarily due to continued increases in expected credit losses on the assets underlying the
securitizations. For further information on the securitizations see
Note 10 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1. Financial
Statements herein.
Three Months. We recognized a loss of $4.3 million for the three month period ended June 30,
2010. In 2010, $0.3 million was related to a reduction in the residual valuation and $4.0 million
was related to a reduction in the transferors interest carried within consumer loans on the HELOC
securitizations. Additionally, during the second quarter 2010, we wrote down the remaining amount
of residual on our FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC Securitization and recorded a liability of $7.6 million to
reflect the expected liability arising from future transferors interest. At June 30, 2010, our
expected liability was $7.5 million.
Six Months. We recognized a loss of $7.0 million for the six month period ended June 30,
2010. In 2010, $2.1 million was related to a reduction in the residual valuation and $4.9 million
was related to a reduction in the transferors interest carried within consumer loans on the HELOC
securitizations. Additionally, during the second quarter 2010, we wrote down the remaining amount
of residual on our FSTAR 2005-1 HELOC Securitization.
Net Gain on Loan Sales. Our home lending operation records the transaction fee income it
generates from the origination, securitization and sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market.
The amount of net gain on loan sales recognized is a function of the volume of mortgage loans
originated for sale and the fair value of these loans, net of related selling expenses. Net gain
on loan sales is increased or decreased by any mark to market pricing adjustments on loan
commitments and forward sales commitments, increases to the secondary market reserve related to
loans sold during the period, and related administrative expenses. The volatility in the gain on
sale spread is attributable to market pricing, which changes with demand and the general level of
interest rates. Generally, we are able to sell loans into the secondary market at a higher margin
during periods of low or decreasing interest rates. Typically, as the volume of acquirable loans
increases in a lower or falling interest rate environment, we are able to pay less to acquire loans
and are then able to achieve higher spreads on the eventual sale of the acquired loans. In
contrast, when interest rates rise, the volume of acquirable loans decreases and therefore we may
need to pay more in the acquisition phase, thus decreasing our net gain achievable. During 2008
and into 2009, our net gain was also affected by increasing spreads available from securities we
sell that are guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and by a combination of a significant
decline in residential mortgage lenders and a significant shift in loan demand to Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac conforming residential mortgage loans and Federal Housing Administration insured loans,
which have provided us with more favorable loan pricing opportunities for conventional residential
mortgage products.
The following table provides information on our net gain on loan sales reported in our
consolidated financial statements and loans sold within the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on loan sales |
|
$ |
64,257 |
|
|
$ |
104,664 |
|
|
$ |
116,823 |
|
|
$ |
300,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans sold or securitized |
|
$ |
5,259,830 |
|
|
$ |
9,878,035 |
|
|
$ |
10,274,686 |
|
|
$ |
17,577,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread achieved |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
1.06 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
60
Three Months. For the three month period ended June 30, 2010, net gain on loan sales
decreased $40.4 million to $64.3 million from $104.7 million in the comparable 2009 period. The
2010 period reflects the sale of $5.3 billion in loans versus $9.9 billion sold in the 2009 period.
Management believes changes in market conditions during the 2009 period which have continued into
2010 resulted in a decreased mortgage loan origination volume ($5.5 billion in the 2010 period
versus $9.3 billion in the 2009 period) and an overall increase on sale spread (122 basis points in
the 2010 period versus 106 basis points in the 2009 period).
Our calculation of net gain on loan sales reflects our adoption of fair value accounting for
the majority of our mortgage loans available for sale beginning January 1, 2009. For more
information, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein. The
effect of the application of fair value accounting on the current quarters operations amounted to
$49.7 million of additional gain on loan sales. This amount represents the recording of the
mortgage loans available for sale which remained on our consolidated statement of financial
condition at June 30, 2010 at their estimated fair value. In addition, we also had changes in
amounts related to derivatives, lower of cost or market adjustments on loans transferred to held
for investment and provisions to our secondary market reserve. Changes in amounts related to loan
commitments and forward sales commitments amounted to
$25.4 million and $8.6 million in gains for the
three month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Lower of cost or market adjustments
amounted to $0.04 million and $0.2 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Provisions to our secondary market reserve amounted to $6.8 million and $7.1
million, for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively. Also included in
our net gain on loan sales is the capitalized value of our MSRs,
which totaled $45.1 million and
$108.6 million for the three month periods, ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively.
Six months. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net gain on loan sales decreased to
$116.8 million from $300.4 million in the 2009 period. The 2010 period reflects the sale of $10.3
billion in loans versus $17.6 billion sold in the 2009 period. Management believes changes in
market conditions, including favorable consumer mortgage rates for both purchases and refinancings
as well as fewer competitors, during the 2010 period resulted in a decreased mortgage loan
origination volume ($9.8 billion in the 2010 period versus $18.8 billion in the 2009 period) and a
lower overall gain on sale spread (114 basis points in the 2010 versus 171 basis points in the 2009
period).
The effect of our adoption of fair value accounting on the current years operations amounted
to $49.7 million. This amount represents the recording of the mortgage loans available for sale
that remained on our statement of financial condition at June 30, 2010 at their estimated fair
value. In addition, we also had changes in amounts related to Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) Topic 815, lower of cost or market adjustments on loans transferred to held for investment
and provisions to our secondary market reserve. Changes in amounts related to ASC Topic 815
amounted to $42.4 million loss and $15.3 million gain for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Lower of cost or market adjustments amounted to $0.1 million and $0.4 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Provisions to our secondary market
reserve amounted to $13.9 million and $10.9 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Also included in our net gain on loan sales is the capitalized value of our
MSRs, which totaled $93.4 million and $191.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Net (Loss) Gain on Sales of Mortgage Servicing Rights. As part of our business model, our
home lending operation occasionally sells MSRs in transactions separate from the sale of the
underlying loans. Because we carry most of our MSRs at fair value, we would not expect to realize
significant gains or losses at the time of the sale. Instead, our income or loss on changes in the
valuation of MSRs would be recorded through our loan administration income.
Three Months. For the three month period ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a loss on sales of
MSRs of $1.3 million compared to a $2.5 million loss recorded for the same period in 2009. During
the period, we transferred the related servicing rights on our two private second mortgage
loans securitizations, FSTAR 2006-1 and FSTAR 2007-1. At the time, we had amortized costs of $5.1
million and a recorded impairment of $3.8 million.
Six months. For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a loss on sales of MSRs
of $3.5 million compared to a $2.6 million loss recorded for the same period in 2009. During the
period, we transferred the related servicing rights on our two private second mortgage loans
securitizations, FSTAR 2006-1 and FSTAR 2007-1. At that time, we had amortized costs of $5.1
million and a recorded impairment of $3.8 million. For the six month period ending June 30, 2010,
we sold servicing rights related to $10.8 billion of loans serviced for others on a bulk basis and
sold $2.3 billion on a bulk basis for the comparable 2009 period.
61
Net Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale. Securities classified as available for sale
are comprised of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized
mortgage obligations (CMOs).
Three Months. Gains on the sale of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed
securities classified as available for sale securities and that had been recently created with
underlying mortgage products originated by the Bank are reported within net gain on loan sale.
Securities in this category have typically remained in the portfolio less than 90 days before sale.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, sales of these agency securities with underlying
mortgage products originated by the Bank were $143.4 million, resulting in $0.2 million of net gain
on loan sale versus $45.2 million resulting in $0.8 million of net gain on loan sale during the
same period in 2009.
Gain on sales for all other available for sale securities types are reported in net gain on
sale of available for sales securities. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we sold
$198.2 million in purchased agency and non-agency securities available for sale. This sale
generated a net gain on sale of available for sale securities of $4.5 million versus no sales for
the comparable 2009 period.
Six Months. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, sales of agency securities with
underlying mortgage products originated by the Bank were $143.4 million resulting in $0.2 million
of net gain on loan sale compared with a $12.0 million gain on $462.5 billion during the six months
ended June 30, 2009.
Gain on sales for all other available for sale securities types are reported in net gain on
sale of available for sales securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we sold $251.0
million in purchased agency and non-agency securities versus no sales of such securities for the
comparable 2009 period. This sale generated a net gain on sale of available for sale
securities of $6.7 million.
Net Impairment Losses Recognized Through Earnings. As required by current accounting guidance
for investments in debt and equity securities with other-than-temporary impairments, we may also
incur losses on securities available for sale as a result of a reduction in the estimated fair
value of the security when that decline has been deemed to be other-than-temporary. Prior to the
first quarter of 2009, if an other-than-temporary impairment was identified, the difference between
the amortized cost and the fair value was recorded as a loss through operations. Beginning in the
first quarter of 2009, accounting guidance changed to only recognize the portion of an
other-than-temporary impairment related to credit losses through operations, with any remainder
recognized through other comprehensive income. Further, upon adoption, the guidance required a
cumulative adjustment increasing retained earnings and other comprehensive loss by the non-credit
portion of other-than-temporary impairment.
Generally, an investment impairment analysis is performed when the estimated fair value is
less than amortized cost for an extended period of time, generally six months. Before an analysis
is performed, we also review the general market conditions for the specific type of underlying
collateral for each security. We model the expected cash flows of the underlying mortgage assets
using historical factors such as default rates and current delinquency and estimated factors such
as prepayment speed, default speed and severity speed. Cash flows are then modeled through the
appropriate waterfall for each CMO tranche owned, including consideration of the level of credit
support provided by subordinated tranches. The resulting cash flow of principal and interest is
then utilized by management to determine the amount of credit losses by security. For further
information on impairment losses, see Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in
Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
Three Months. In the three month period ended June 30, 2010, additional other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI) due to credit losses on investments with existing other-than-temporary
impairment credit losses totaled $0.4 million while two additional OTTI due to credit loss was
recognized on securities that did not already have such losses; all OTTI due to credit losses were
recognized in current operations. In the three months ended June 30, 2009, additional credit
losses on the CMOs totaled $0.3 million, which was recognized in current operations.
Six Months. In the six months ended June 30, 2010, additional credit losses on CMOs totaled
$3.7 million, which was recognized in current operations. For the comparable period in 2009,
additional credit losses recognized in current operations were $17.6 million.
Other Fees and Charges. Other fees and charges include certain miscellaneous fees, including
dividends received on FHLB stock and income generated by our subsidiaries Flagstar Reinsurance
Company (formerly Flagstar Credit, Inc.), Douglas Insurance Agency, Inc., and Paperless Office
Solutions, Inc.
Three Months. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded $1.8 million in cash
dividends received on FHLB stock compared to the $2.1 million received during the three months
ended June 30, 2009. During 2010, subsidiaries earned fees of $0.8 million versus $2.6 million in
2009. The amount of fees earned by Flagstar Reinsurance Company varies with the volume of loans
that were insured during the respective periods. Also during the three month period ended June 30,
2010, we recorded an expense of $11.4 million for the increase in our secondary market reserve due
to our change in estimate of expected losses from loans sold in prior periods, which decreased from
the $16.9 million recorded in the comparable 2009 period.
62
Six months. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded $3.7 million in cash
dividends received on FHLB stock, compared to the $1.3 million received during the six months ended
June 30, 2009. We also recorded $1.6 million and $5.1 million in subsidiary income for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition, we recorded expense of $38.2
million and $27.7 million relating to adjustments to our estimates in determining our secondary
market reserve, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Non-Interest Expense
The following table sets forth the components of our non-interest expense, along with the
allocation of expenses related to loan originations that are deferred pursuant to accounting
guidance for receivables, non-refundable fees and other costs. Mortgage loan fees and direct
origination costs (principally compensation and benefits) are capitalized as an adjustment to the
basis of the loans originated during the period and amortized to expense over the lives of the
respective loans rather than immediately expensed. Other expenses associated with loan production,
however, are not required or allowed to be capitalized and are, therefore, expensed when incurred.
Effective January 1, 2009, we elected to account for substantially all of our mortgage loans
available for sale using the fair value method and, therefore, immediately began recognizing loan
origination fees and direct origination costs in the period incurred rather than deferring such
items as in prior periods.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
43,260 |
|
|
$ |
56,584 |
|
|
$ |
97,192 |
|
|
$ |
115,238 |
|
Commissions |
|
|
7,946 |
|
|
|
15,304 |
|
|
|
15,097 |
|
|
|
48,717 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
15,903 |
|
|
|
17,499 |
|
|
|
31,914 |
|
|
|
36,378 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
2,505 |
|
|
|
3,254 |
|
|
|
4,664 |
|
|
|
5,748 |
|
Federal insurance premium |
|
|
10,640 |
|
|
|
16,612 |
|
|
|
20,688 |
|
|
|
20,848 |
|
Communications |
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
Asset resolution |
|
|
45,439 |
|
|
|
17,977 |
|
|
|
62,012 |
|
|
|
42,850 |
|
Warrant (income) expense |
|
|
(3,486 |
) |
|
|
12,977 |
|
|
|
(2,259 |
) |
|
|
24,005 |
|
Other |
|
|
24,953 |
|
|
|
29,133 |
|
|
|
39,190 |
|
|
|
55,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
149,135 |
|
|
|
172,068 |
|
|
|
272,540 |
|
|
|
355,020 |
|
Less: capitalized direct
costs of loan closings, in
accordance with ASC 310 |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total, net |
|
$ |
149,033 |
|
|
$ |
171,818 |
|
|
$ |
272,376 |
|
|
$ |
354,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio (1) |
|
|
104.4 |
% |
|
|
88.3 |
% |
|
|
107.9 |
% |
|
|
80.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total operating and administrative expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and
non-interest income. |
Three Months. Non-interest expenses totaled $149.1 million during the three month period
ended June 30, 2010 compared to $172.1 million in the comparable 2009 period. The 13.4% decrease
in non-interest expense was largely due to a decline in commissions, a decrease in warrant expense,
and an overall reduction in expenses resulting from cost-saving measures. Moreover, for the first
six months in 2010, we closed 13 banking centers, bringing our banking center network total at June
30, 2010 to 162.
Our gross compensation and benefit expense totaled $43.3 million for the three month period
ended June 30, 2010, compared to $56.6 million in the comparable 2009 period. The 23.5% decrease
in gross compensation and benefits expense is primarily attributable to a reduction in our salaried
workers. Our full-time equivalent (FTE) salaried employees decreased by 405 from June 30, 2009
to 2,885 at June 30, 2010, which largely reflects a reduction in bank employees due to branch
closings. Commission expense, which is a variable cost associated with loan production, totaled
$7.9 million, equal to 15 basis points (0.15)% of total loan production in 2010 as compared to
$15.3 million, equal to 16 basis points (0.16)% of total loan production in the comparable 2009
period. The decline in commission is due to a revised compensation structure across our various
distribution channels. Occupancy and equipment totaled $15.9 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, a decrease of $1.6 million from the comparable 2009 period, which reflects the
closing of various non-profitable home loan centers. Our FDIC insurance premiums were $10.6
million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $16.6 million at 2009 due in part
to the special FDIC premium charged in 2009. We recorded $1.1 million in communication expense for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $1.6 million for the comparable 2009 period.
These expenses typically include
63
telephone, fax and other types of electronic communication. The decrease in communication
expenses is reflective of a decrease in our banking centers as well as expense reductions resulting
from our vendor management initiatives. Asset resolution expenses consists of foreclosure and
other disposition and carrying costs, loss provisions and gains and losses on the sale of REO
properties that we have obtained through foreclosure or other proceedings. Asset resolution
expense increased $27.4 million to $45.4 million primarily due to an increase in our provision for
REO loss, which increased from $10.7 million to
$37.0 million, an increase of $26.3 million, net of
any gain on REO and recovery of related debt. Warrant expense decreased to an income of $3.5
million for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to an expense of $13.0 million during the same
period in 2009. The difference is attributable to the decline in the market price of the Companys
common stock since June 30, 2009 and to the expense related to warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury
as part of the TARP program and subsequently reclassified from a liability to equity.
Six Months. Non-interest expense totaled $272.5 million during the six months ended June 30,
2010, compared to $355.0 million in the comparable 2009 period. The 23.2% decrease in non-interest
expense was largely due to a decline in commissions, a decrease in warrant expense and an overall
reduction in expenses resulting from cost-saving measures. Our gross compensation and benefit
expense totaled $97.2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, compared to $115.2
million in the comparable 2009 period. The 15.6% decrease in gross compensation and benefits
expense is primarily attributable to a reduction in our salaried workers, as previously discussed.
Commission expense, totaled $15.1 million, equal to 15 basis
points (0.15%) of total loan production
in 2010 as compared to $48.7 million, equal to 26 basis points (0.26)% of total loan production in
the comparable 2009 period. Our FDIC insurance premiums were $20.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to $20.8 million at 2009. Asset resolution expense increased $19.1
million to $62.0 million primarily due to an increase in our provision for REO loss. Provision for
REO loss increased from $28.1 million to $45.0 million, an increase of $24.5 million net of any
gain on REO and recovery of related debt. Warrant expense decreased from $24.0 million during the
six month period ended June 30, 2009 to an income item of $3.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010. The $26.3 million decrease was primarily due to the discontinuation of recording
the valuation for Treasury Warrants that were valued in the comparable 2009 period at $21.9 million
as well as the decline in the Companys market price of its common stock. Other expenses totaled
$39.2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $55.8 million in the
comparable 2009 period. The $16.6 million decrease was primarily due to a $20.2 million decrease
in net reinsurance expense.
Provision (Benefit) for Federal Income Taxes
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, we recorded no provision
for federal income taxes as the tax benefit for the pretax losses were offset by an increase in the
valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets. For the comparable 2009 periods, tax benefits were
30.4% and 30.6% of our pretax loss, respectively. For each period, the benefit for federal income
taxes varies from statutory rates primarily because of certain non-deductible corporate and warrant
expenses.
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Under this
pronouncement, deferred taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. In addition a deferred tax asset is recorded for net operating loss
carry forwards and unused tax credits. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates that will apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes
the enactment date.
We periodically review the carrying amount of our deferred tax assets to determine if the
establishment of a valuation allowance is necessary. If based on the available evidence, it is
more likely than not that all or a portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized in
future periods, a deferred tax valuation allowance would be established. Consideration is given to
all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets.
In evaluating this available evidence, we consider historical financial performance,
expectation of future earnings, the ability to carry back losses to recoup taxes previously paid,
length of statutory carry forward periods, experience with operating loss and tax credit carry
forwards not expiring unused, tax planning strategies and timing of reversals of temporary
differences. Significant judgment is required in assessing future earning trends and the timing of
reversals of temporary differences. Our evaluation is based on current tax law as well as our own
expectations of future performance.
FASB ASC Topic 740 suggests that additional scrutiny should be given to whether a valuation
allowance should be established for deferred tax assets of an entity with cumulative pre-tax losses
during the three most recent years. We had cumulative pre-tax losses in 2007, 2008 and 2009, which
we considered this factor in our analysis of deferred tax assets. Additionally, based on the
continued economic uncertainty that persists at this time, we believed that it was probable that we
would not generate significant pre-tax income in the near terms. As a result of these two
significant facts, we continued to maintain the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets
which totaled $260.0 million as of June 30, 2010. See Note 13
of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
64
Analysis of Items on Statements of Financial Condition
Assets
Securities Classified as Trading. Securities classified as trading are comprised of U.S.
government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, Treasury bonds, and non-investment grade
residual interests from our private-label securitizations. Changes to the fair value of trading
securities are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. At June 30, 2010 there were
$487.4 million in Treasury bonds and agency mortgage-backed securities in trading as compared to
$328.2 million at December 31, 2009. U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities
held in trading are distinguished from those classified as available-for-sale based upon the intent
of management to use them as an offset against changes in the valuation of the MSR portfolio,
however, these securities do not qualify as an accounting hedge as defined in U.S. GAAP. The
non-investment grade residual interests resulting from our private label securitizations was zero
at June 30, 2010 versus $2.1 million at December 31, 2009. During the three month period ended
June 30, 2010, we wrote off the remaining amount of our residual assets as a result of the increase
in actual and probable losses in the second mortgages and HELOCs that underlie these assets. See
Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
Securities Classified as Available-for-Sale. Securities classified as available-for-sale,
which are comprised of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and CMOs,
decreased to $0.5 billion at June 30, 2010, from $0.6 billion at December 31, 2009. See Note 5 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
Other Investments Restricted. These investments are comprised principally of a mutual fund
which holds funds for our captive reinsurance subsidiary based upon contractual requirements with
the mortgage insurance company that is associated with our mortgage reinsurance business and
decreased from $15.6 million at December 31, 2009 to $2.0 million at June 30, 2010. We have other
investments in our insurance subsidiary which are restricted as to their use. These assets can
only be used to pay insurance claims in that subsidiary. These securities had a fair value that
approximates their recorded amount for each period presented.
Loans Available for Sale. We sell substantially all of the mortgage loans we
produce into the secondary market on a whole loan basis or by securitizing the loans into
mortgage-backed securities. At June 30, 2010, we held loans available for sale of $1.8 billion,
which was a decrease of $120.4 million from $2.0 billion held at December 31, 2009. Our loan
production is typically inversely related to the level of long-term interest rates. As long-term
rates decrease, we tend to originate an increasing number of mortgage loans. A significant amount
of the loan origination activity during periods of falling interest rates is derived from
refinancing of existing mortgage loans. Conversely, during periods of increasing long-term rates
loan originations tend to decrease. The decrease in the balance of loans available for sale was
principally attributable to the lower volume of loan originations during the six month period ended
June 30, 2010, offset in part by the inclusion of approximately $121.2 million of certain loans
sold to Ginnie Mae, as to which we have not yet repurchased but have the unilateral right to do so.
For further information on our loans available for sale, see Note 7
of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
Loans Held for Investment. Our largest category of earning assets consists of loans held for
investment. Loans held for investment consist of residential mortgage loans that we do not hold
for resale (usually shorter duration and adjustable rate loans and second mortgages), other
consumer loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, warehouse loans to other mortgage
lenders and various types of commercial loans such as business lines of credit, working capital
loans and equipment loans. Loans held for investment decreased from $7.7 billion in December 2009,
to $7.4 billion in June 2010 as we continued to originate loans primarily for sale rather than
investment. First mortgage loans held for investment decreased $376.2 million to $4.6 billion,
second mortgage loans decreased $24.9 million to $196.7 million, commercial real estate loans
decreased $160.9 million to $1.4 billion and consumer loans decreased $35.6 million to $388.2
million. For information relating to the concentration of credit of our loans held for investment,
see Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statement and
Supplementary Data, herein.
65
Quality of Earning Assets
The following table sets forth certain information about our non-performing assets
as of the end of each of the last five quarters.
NON-PERFORMING LOANS AND ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans |
|
$ |
1,013,828 |
|
|
$ |
1,136,205 |
|
|
$ |
1,071,636 |
|
|
$ |
1,055,358 |
|
|
$ |
940,777 |
|
Repurchased non-performing assets, net |
|
|
27,985 |
|
|
|
29,189 |
|
|
|
45,697 |
|
|
|
26,601 |
|
|
|
18,384 |
|
Real estate and other repossessed assets, net |
|
|
198,230 |
|
|
|
167,265 |
|
|
|
176,968 |
|
|
|
164,898 |
|
|
|
131,620 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets, net |
|
$ |
1,240,043 |
|
|
$ |
1,332,659 |
|
|
$ |
1,294,301 |
|
|
$ |
1,246,857 |
|
|
$ |
1,090,781 |
|
|
|
|
Ratio of non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
9.06 |
% |
|
|
9.30 |
% |
|
|
9.25 |
% |
|
|
8.44 |
% |
|
|
6.67 |
% |
Ratio of non-performing loans to loans held for
investment |
|
|
13.76 |
% |
|
|
14.99 |
% |
|
|
13.89 |
% |
|
|
12.98 |
% |
|
|
11.18 |
% |
Ratio of allowance to non-performing loans |
|
|
52.3 |
% |
|
|
47.4 |
% |
|
|
48.9 |
% |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
50.4 |
% |
Ratio of allowance to loans held for investment |
|
|
7.20 |
% |
|
|
7.10 |
% |
|
|
6.79 |
% |
|
|
6.49 |
% |
|
|
5.63 |
% |
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans held for
investment |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
Delinquent Loans. Loans are considered to be delinquent when any payment of principal or
interest is past due. While it is the goal of management to work out a satisfactory repayment
schedule or modification with a delinquent borrower, we will undertake foreclosure proceedings if
the delinquency is not satisfactorily resolved. Our procedures regarding delinquent loans are
designed to assist borrowers in meeting their contractual obligations. We customarily mail several
notices of past due payments to the borrower within 30 days after the due date and late charges are
assessed in accordance with certain parameters. Our collection department makes telephone or
personal contact with borrowers after a 30-day delinquency. In certain cases, we recommend that
the borrower seek credit-counseling assistance and may grant forbearance if it is determined that
the borrower is likely to correct a loan delinquency within a reasonable period of time. We cease
the accrual of interest on loans that we classify as non-performing because they are more than
90 days delinquent or earlier when concerns exist as to the ultimate collection of principal or
interest. Such interest is recognized as income only when it is actually collected. At June 30,
2010, we had $1.2 billion in loans that were determined to be delinquent over 30 days or greater
past due. Of those delinquent loans, $1.0 billion of loans were
non-performing (i.e., over 90 days
past due)
of which $678.6 million, or 66.9% were single-family residential mortgage loans.
Loan Modifications. We may modify certain loans to retain customers or to maximize collection
of the loan balance. We have maintained several programs designed to assist borrowers by extending
payment dates or reducing the borrowers contractual payments. All loan modifications are made on a
case by case basis. Loan modification programs for borrowers implemented during the third quarter
of 2009 resulted in a significant increase in restructured loans. These loans are classified as
troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) and are included in non-accrual loans if the loan was
non-accruing prior to the restructuring or if the payment amount increased significantly. These
loans will continue on non-accrual status until the borrower has established a willingness and
ability to make the restructured payments for at least six months.
The following table sets forth information regarding TDRs at June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDRs |
|
|
|
Performing |
|
|
Non-performing |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential |
|
$ |
409,515 |
|
|
$ |
190,215 |
|
|
$ |
599,730 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
25,142 |
|
|
|
125,954 |
|
|
|
151,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
434,657 |
|
|
$ |
316,169 |
|
|
$ |
750,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
The following table sets forth information regarding delinquent loans at the dates listed. At
June 30, 2010, 67.2% of all delinquent loans were loans in which we had a first lien position on
residential real estate.
DELINQUENT LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Days Delinquent |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
30 59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgages |
|
$ |
86,393 |
|
|
$ |
103,785 |
|
Second mortgages |
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
4,386 |
|
HELOC (consumer) |
|
|
3,177 |
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
18,560 |
|
|
|
27,807 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
|
Total 30- 59 days delinquent |
|
|
112,696 |
|
|
|
143,500 |
|
|
|
|
60 - 89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgages |
|
|
57,665 |
|
|
|
71,804 |
|
Second mortgages |
|
|
2,732 |
|
|
|
4,164 |
|
HELOC (consumer) |
|
|
2,835 |
|
|
|
3,807 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
16,395 |
|
|
|
6,818 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
|
Total 60- 89 days delinquent |
|
|
83,044 |
|
|
|
87,625 |
|
|
|
|
90 + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgages |
|
|
663,512 |
|
|
|
659,469 |
|
Second mortgages |
|
|
9,562 |
|
|
|
8,202 |
|
HELOC (consumer) |
|
|
5,845 |
|
|
|
7,652 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
324,859 |
|
|
|
385,687 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,051 |
|
|
|
10,626 |
|
|
|
|
Total 90+ days delinquent |
|
|
1,013,829 |
|
|
|
1,071,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total delinquent loans |
|
$ |
1,209,569 |
|
|
$ |
1,302,761 |
|
|
|
|
We calculate our delinquent loans using a method required by the OTS when we prepare
regulatory reports that we submit to the OTS each quarter. This method, also called the OTS
Method, considers a loan to be delinquent if no payment is received after the first day of the
month following the month of the missed payment. Other companies with mortgage banking operations
similar to ours may use the Mortgage Bankers Association Method (MBA Method) which considers a
loan to be delinquent if payment is not received by the end of the month of the missed payment.
The key difference between the two methods is that a loan considered delinquent under the MBA
Method would not be considered delinquent under the OTS Method for another 30 days. Under the
MBA Method of calculating delinquent loans, 30 day delinquencies equaled $218 million, 60 day
delinquencies equaled $112.6 million and 90 day delinquencies equaled $1.1 billion at June 30,
2010. Total delinquent loans under the MBA Method total $1.4 billion or 19.1% of loans held for
investment at June 30, 2010. By comparison, delinquent loans under the MBA Method total $1.5
billion or 19.1% of loans held for investment at December 31, 2009.
67
The following table sets forth information regarding non-performing loans as to which we have
ceased accruing interest:
NON-ACCRUAL LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of |
|
|
As a % of |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
Specified |
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
$ |
4,614,822 |
|
|
$ |
662,665 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
66.7 |
% |
Second mortgages |
|
|
196,702 |
|
|
|
9,562 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,439,324 |
|
|
|
306,122 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
13,003 |
|
|
|
4,701 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Warehouse lending |
|
|
702,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
388,250 |
|
|
|
6,015 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Commercial non-real estate |
|
|
11,261 |
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
7,365,817 |
|
|
$ |
993,360 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(530,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment, net |
|
$ |
6,835,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of
probable losses in our loans held for investment portfolio as of the date of the consolidated
financial statements. The allowance provides for probable losses that have been identified with
specific customer relationships and for probable losses believed to be inherent in the loan
portfolio but that have not been specifically identified.
We perform a detailed credit quality review at least annually on large commercial
loans as well as on selected other smaller balance commercial loans. Commercial and commercial
real estate loans that are determined to be substandard and certain delinquent residential mortgage
loans that exceed $1.0 million are treated as impaired and are individually evaluated to determine
the necessity of a specific reserve in accordance with the provisions of U.S. GAAP. The accounting
guidance requires a specific allowance to be established as a component of the allowance for loan
losses when it is probable all amounts due will not be collected pursuant to the contractual terms
of the loan and the recorded investment in the loan exceeds its fair value. Fair value is measured
using either the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective
interest rate, the observable market price of the loan, or the fair value of the collateral if the
loan is collateral dependent, reduced by estimated disposal costs. In estimating the fair value of
collateral, we utilize outside fee-based appraisers to evaluate various factors such as occupancy
and rental rates in our real estate markets and the level of obsolescence that may exist on assets
acquired from commercial business loans.
A portion of the allowance is also allocated to the remaining classified commercial
loans by applying projected loss ratios, based on numerous factors identified below, to the loans
within the different risk ratings.
Additionally, management has sub-divided the homogeneous portfolios, including
consumer and residential mortgage loans, into categories that have exhibited a greater loss
exposure such as delinquent and modified loans
.. The portion of the allowance allocated to other
consumer and residential mortgage loans is determined by applying projected loss ratios to various
segments of the loan portfolio. Projected loss ratios incorporate factors such as recent
charge-off experience, current economic conditions and trends, and trends with respect to past due
and non-accrual amounts.
Our assessments of loss exposure from the homogeneous risk pools discussed above are
based upon consideration of the historical loss rates associated with those pools of loans. Such
loans are included within first mortgage residential loans, as to which we establish a reserve
based on a number of factors, such as days past due, delinquency and severity rates in the
portfolio, loan-to-value ratios based on most recently available appraisals or broker price
opinions, and availability of mortgage insurance or government guarantees. The severity rates used
in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses are indicative of, and
thereby inclusive of consideration of, declining collateral values.
As the process for determining the adequacy of the allowance requires subjective and
complex judgment by management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain,
subsequent evaluations of the loan portfolio, in light of the factors then prevailing, may result
in significant changes in the allowance for loan losses. In estimating the amount of credit losses
inherent in our loan portfolio various assumptions are made. For example, when assessing the
condition of the overall economic environment assumptions are made regarding current economic
trends and their impact on the loan portfolio. In the event the national economy were to sustain a
prolonged downturn, the loss factors applied to our portfolios may need to
68
be revised, which may significantly impact the measurement of the allowance for loan losses. For impaired loans that are
collateral dependent, the estimated fair value of the collateral may deviate significantly from the
net proceeds received when the collateral is sold.
The deterioration in credit quality that began in the latter half of 2007 continued throughout
2008, 2009 and into a portion of 2010 as evidenced by worsening in the local and national economies
and steep declines in the real estate market. This deterioration may
be stabilizing as
reflected in
the decrease in delinquency rates. The overall delinquency rate (loans over 30 days delinquent
using the OTS Method) decreased for the first six months in 2010 to 16.42% down from 16.89% as of
December 31, 2009 and, for seriously delinquent loans (loans over 90 days delinquent using the OTS
Method), to 13.76% from 13.89%, respectively. At June 30, 2010, nonperforming loans totaled $1.0
billion, an increase of $0.1 million, or 9.1% over the amount at December 31, 2009. Certain
portfolios continue to show particular credit weakness. These include construction and land lot
loans, as well as the commercial real estate portfolio.
Residential Real Estate. As of June 30, 2010, non-performing residential first mortgages,
including land lot loans, increased to $663.5 million, up $4.0 million or 0.6% from $659.5 million
at the end of 2009. Although our portfolio is diversified throughout the United States, the
largest concentrations of loans are in California, Florida and Michigan. Each of those real estate
markets has experienced steep declines in real estate values beginning in 2007 and continuing
through a portion of 2010. Net charge-offs within the residential first mortgage portfolio,
totaled $74.0 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to $32.8 million for
the quarter ended December 31, 2009, which represents an 33.8% decrease.
The overall delinquency rate in the residential construction loan portfolio was 43.93% as of
June 30, 2010, up from 42.45% as of December 31, 2009. Non-performing construction loans increased
to $5.5 million or 42.41% of the construction loan portfolio as of June 30, 2010 up from 29.06% as
of December 31, 2009. With the real estate market declines, downward pressure on new home prices,
and lack of end loan financing, this portfolio is experiencing declines in credit quality. Net
charge-offs in the construction loan portfolio totaled approximately $76,000 for the three month
period ended June 30, 2010 down from $1.5 million for the same period in 2009.
Commercial Real Estate. The commercial real estate portfolio has experienced deterioration in
credit beginning in mid-2007 and continuing into 2010 primarily in the commercial land residential
development loans. Office and retail loan portfolios continue to face pressure from current
economic conditions. Non-performing commercial real estate loans have decreased to 22.57% of the
portfolio at June 30, 2010 down from 24.10% as of the end of 2009. Net charge-offs within the
commercial real estate portfolio totaled $39.6 million for the three month period ended June 30,
2010 down from $42.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009.
Management maintains an unallocated allowance to recognize the uncertainty and imprecision
underlying the process of estimating expected loan losses for the entire loan portfolio.
Determination of the probable losses inherent in the portfolio, which is not necessarily captured
by the allocation methodology discussed above, involves the exercise of judgment.
The allowance for loan losses increased to $530.0 million at June 30, 2010 from $524.0 million
at December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans
increased to 52.3% from 48.9% at December 31, 2009, which reflects the changes in assumptions for
loss rates as well as the effect of charge-offs taken during the period in light of the virtually
static nature of the Banks portfolio (i.e., few new loans). The allowance for loan losses as a
percentage of investment loans increased to 7.20% from 6.79% as of December 31, 2009.
69
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the allocation of our allowance
for loan losses to each loan category as of June 30, 2010:
Allowance For Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
of |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
to Total |
|
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
$ |
4,614,822 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
% |
|
$ |
278,254 |
|
|
|
52.5 |
% |
Second mortgages |
|
|
196,702 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
32,282 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,439,324 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
166,890 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
Construction |
|
|
13,003 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
702,455 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
4,696 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
388,250 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
32,779 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Commercial non-real estate |
|
|
11,261 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2,892 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
10,213 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,365,817 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
530,000 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the general reserve and specific
reserve composition of allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2010:
Composition of Allowance for Loan Losses
At June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
Specific |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
First mortgage loans |
|
$ |
249,929 |
|
|
$ |
28,325 |
|
|
$ |
278,254 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
32,161 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
32,282 |
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
46,264 |
|
|
|
120,626 |
|
|
|
166,890 |
|
Construction loans residential |
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
3,358 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
4,696 |
|
Consumer loans, including home equity lines of credit |
|
|
32,582 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
32,779 |
|
Non-real estate commercial |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
2,892 |
|
Other and unallocated |
|
|
10,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
377,298 |
|
|
$ |
152,702 |
|
|
$ |
530,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses is considered adequate based upon managements assessment of
relevant factors, including the types and amounts of non-performing loans, historical and current
loss experience on such types of loans, and the current economic environment.
70
The following table shows the activity in the allowance for loan losses during the indicated
periods:
Activity Within the Allowance For Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
524,000 |
|
|
$ |
376,000 |
|
|
$ |
376,000 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
149,579 |
|
|
|
283,876 |
|
|
|
504,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage |
|
|
(75,282 |
) |
|
|
(56,164 |
) |
|
|
(127,257 |
) |
Second mortgage |
|
|
(15,096 |
) |
|
|
(24,394 |
) |
|
|
(42,695 |
) |
Commercial |
|
|
(40,199 |
) |
|
|
(87,415 |
) |
|
|
(147,549 |
) |
Construction residential |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
(2,922 |
) |
Warehouse |
|
|
(1,749 |
) |
|
|
(503 |
) |
|
|
(1,123 |
) |
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
(12,240 |
) |
|
|
(15,526 |
) |
|
|
(35,807 |
) |
Other consumer |
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
(2,371 |
) |
|
|
(4,634 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
(2,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
(147,648 |
) |
|
|
(189,025 |
) |
|
|
(364,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage |
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
2,586 |
|
Construction residential |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
Other |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
4,069 |
|
|
|
3,149 |
|
|
|
8,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs, net of recoveries |
|
|
(143,579 |
) |
|
|
(185,876 |
) |
|
|
(356,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
530,000 |
|
|
$ |
474,000 |
|
|
$ |
524,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off ratio |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
The following table sets forth information regarding non-performing loans (i.e., over 90 days
delinquent loans) at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Non-performing loans |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans secured by real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home loans secured by first lien |
|
$ |
663,512 |
|
|
$ |
659,469 |
|
Home loans secured by second lien |
|
|
9,562 |
|
|
|
8,202 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
5,845 |
|
|
|
7,652 |
|
Construction residential |
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
4,835 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
324,859 |
|
|
|
385,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans secured by real
estate |
|
|
1,009,293 |
|
|
|
1,065,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
4,666 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans held in portfolio |
|
$ |
1,013,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,071,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In response to increasing rates of delinquency and steeply declining market values, management
implemented a program to modify the terms of existing loans in an effort to mitigate losses and
keep borrowers in their homes. These aggressive modification programs began in the latter months of
2009 and increased substantially in 2010. As of June 30, 2010, we had $750.8 million in
restructured loans in the loans held for investment portfolio, of which $316.2 million were
included in non-performing loans.
Restructured loans by loan type are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
2009 |
|
Restructured Loans |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
First mortgage loans |
|
$ |
585,975 |
|
|
$ |
537,462 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
13,703 |
|
|
|
15,719 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
151,096 |
|
|
|
156,991 |
|
HELOC |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
750,826 |
|
|
$ |
710,270 |
|
|
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable. Accrued interest receivable decreased to $41.8 million at June
30, 2010 from $44.9 million at December 31, 2009 reflecting a slight decline (6.31%) in our total
earning assets. Also, as the balance of non-accrual loans remained at $1.1 billion at June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009. We typically collect interest in the month following the month in which it
is earned.
Repossessed Assets. Real property we acquire as a result of the foreclosure process is
classified as real estate owned until it is sold. It is transferred from the loans held for
investment portfolio at the lower of cost or market value, less disposal costs. Management decides
whether to rehabilitate the property or sell it as is and whether to list the property with a
broker. At June 30, 2010, we had $198.2 million of repossessed assets compared to $177.0 million
at December 31, 2009. The increase was the result of a increase of $2.4 million in new
foreclosures, to $131.9 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2010 as compared to
$129.5 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2009.
72
The following schedule provides the activity for repossessed assets during each of the past
five quarters:
Net Repossessed Asset Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
167,265 |
|
|
$ |
176,968 |
|
|
$ |
164,898 |
|
|
$ |
131,620 |
|
|
$ |
106,486 |
|
Additions |
|
|
91,119 |
|
|
|
40,750 |
|
|
|
60,466 |
|
|
|
69,032 |
|
|
|
57,604 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(60,154 |
) |
|
|
(50,453 |
) |
|
|
(48,396 |
) |
|
|
(35,754 |
) |
|
|
(32,470 |
) |
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
198,230 |
|
|
$ |
167,265 |
|
|
$ |
176,968 |
|
|
$ |
164,898 |
|
|
$ |
131,620 |
|
|
|
|
Premises and Equipment. Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, totaled
$234.9 million at June 30, 2010, a decrease of $4.4 million, or 1.9% from $239.3 million at
December 31, 2009. Our investment in property and equipment decreased due to our decision to limit
branch expansion.
Mortgage Servicing Rights. At June 30, 2010, MSRs included residential MSRs carried at fair
value amounting to $473.7 million and consumer MSRs carried at lower of amortized cost or market
amounting to $1.1 million. At December 31, 2009, residential MSRs amounted to $649.1 million and
consumer MSRs carried at amortized cost amounted to $3.2 million. During the six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded additions to our residential MSRs of $93.4 million and $191.3
million, respectively, due to loan sales or securitizations. Also, during the six month period
ended June 30, 2010, we reduced the amount of MSRs by $115.1 million related to bulk servicing
sales and $31.4 million related to loans that paid off during the period and decreases of $122.3
million related to the realization of expected cash flows and market driven changes, primarily as a
result of increases in mortgage loan rates that led to an expected decrease in prepayment speeds.
See Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements
herein.
The principal balance of the loans underlying our total MSRs was $50.4 billion at June 30,
2010 versus $56.6 billion at December 31, 2009, with the decrease primarily attributable to our
bulk and flow servicing sale of $10.8 billion in underlying loans partially offset by loan
origination activity for 2010.
Other Assets. Other assets increased $0.6 billion, or 46.2% to $1.9 billion at June 30, 2010
from $1.3 billion at December 31, 2009. We sell a majority of the mortgage loans produced into the
secondary market on a whole loan basis or by securitizing the loans into mortgage-backed
securities. When we sell or securitize mortgage loans, we make customary representations and
warranties. If a defect is identified, we may be required to either repurchase the loan or
indemnify the purchaser for losses it sustains on the loan. Repurchased loans that are performing
according to their terms are included within loans held for investment portfolio. Repurchased loans
that are not performing when repurchased are included within the other assets category. A
significant portion of these are government-guaranteed or insured loans that are repurchased from
Ginnie Mae securitizations in place of continuing to advance delinquent principal and interest
installments to security holders after a specified delinquency period. Losses and expenses incurred
on these repurchases through the foreclosure process generally are reimbursed according to claim
filing guidelines. The balance of such Ginnie Mae loans held by us was $1.4 billion at June 30,
2010 and $826.3 million at December 31, 2009. The balance has increased substantially year over
year due to the growth in our government lending area throughout 2007 and 2008 combined with the
increase in the default levels within the marketplace.
See Note 12 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements
herein.
Liabilities
Deposits. Our deposits can be subdivided into four areas: retail banking, government banking,
national accounts and company controlled deposits. Retail deposit accounts decreased $245 million,
or 4.7% to $5.2 billion at June 30, 2010, from $5.4 billion at December 31, 2009. Saving and
checking accounts totaled 24.4% of total retail deposits. In addition, at June 30, 2010, retail
certificates of deposit totaled $3.4 billion, with an average balance of $30,860 and a weighted
average cost of 2.87% while money market deposits totaled $553 million, with an average cost of
0.95% Overall, the retail division had an average cost of deposits of 2.13% at June 30, 2010
versus 2.12% at December 31, 2009, reflecting slight increases in savings and money market accounts
as the Bank emphasizes development of its core deposit base and reduces its emphasis on
certificates of deposits.
We call on local municipal agencies as another source for deposit funding. Government banking
deposits increased $146 million or 20.8% to $703.6 million at June 30, 2010, from $557.5 million at
December 31, 2009. These balances fluctuate during the year as the municipalities collect
semi-annual assessments and make necessary disbursements over the following six-months. These
deposits had a weighted average cost of .68% at June 30, 2010 versus 0.60% at December 31, 2009.
These deposit accounts include $220 million of certificates of deposit with maturities typically
less than one year and $467 million in checking and savings accounts.
73
In past years, our national accounts division garnered national accounts, i.e., wholesale
deposits, through the use of investment banking firms. These deposit accounts decreased $0.4
billion, or 26.6% to $1.6 billion at June 30, 2010, from $2.0 billion at December 31, 2009. These
deposits had a weighted average cost of 2.95% at June 30, 2010 versus 2.52% at December 31, 2009.
We do not anticipate adding any national account deposits in 2010.
Company controlled deposits arise due to our servicing of loans for others and represent the
portion of the investor custodial accounts on deposit with the Bank. These deposits do not bear
interest. Company controlled deposits decreased $2 million to $754 million at June 30, 2010 from
$756.4 million at December 31, 2009. This decrease is the result of our decrease in mortgage loans
being serviced for others during the three month period ended June 30, 2010 as well as a higher
volume of loan payoffs which accrue until remitted to the respective U.S. government sponsored
agency for whom the Bank is servicing loans.
We participate in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program,
through which certain customer certificates of deposit (CD) are exchanged for CDs of similar
amounts from other participating banks. This provides our customers with the opportunity to
receive FDIC insurance up to $50 million. At June 30, 2010, $417.7 million of our total CDs were
related to this program.
The composition of our deposits was as follows:
Deposit Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End |
|
|
Of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
End |
|
|
Of |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Rate (4) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Rate (4) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand accounts |
|
$ |
553,770 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
6.71 |
% |
|
$ |
546,218 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
% |
Savings accounts |
|
|
716,822 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
8.68 |
|
|
|
724,278 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
Money Market |
|
|
553,427 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
6.71 |
|
|
|
632,099 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
Certificates of deposit (1) |
|
|
3,385,350 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
41.01 |
|
|
|
3,552,090 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
40.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail deposits |
|
|
5,209,369 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
63.11 |
|
|
|
5,454,685 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
62.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal deposits (2) |
|
|
703,551 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
8.52 |
|
|
|
557,495 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
|
National accounts |
|
|
1,587,087 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
19.23 |
|
|
|
2,009,866 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
22.90 |
|
Company controlled deposits (3) |
|
|
754,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.14 |
|
|
|
756,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
8,254,046 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
8,778,469 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate amount of certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of $100,000 was
approximately $1.3 billion and $1.6 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Government accounts include funds from municipalities and public schools. |
|
(3) |
|
These accounts represent portion of the investor custodial accounts and escrows controlled by
the Company in connection with loans serviced for others and that have been placed on
deposit with the Bank. |
|
(4) |
|
This rate reflects the average rate for the deposit portfolio at the end of the noted month. |
FHLB Advances. At June 30, 2010, FHLB advances decreased to $3.7 billion from $3.9
billion at December 31, 2009, as we prepaid a $250 million higher cost advance at the end of the
second quarter. We incurred a $7.9 million penalty to prepay this
advance. We use advances from the FHLB as a source of funding for the origination or
purchase of loans for sale in the secondary market and for providing duration-specific short-term
and medium-term financing. The outstanding balance of FHLB advances fluctuates from time to time
depending upon our current inventory of mortgage loans available for sale and the availability of
lower cost funding from our deposit base, the company controlled deposits that we hold, or
alternative funding sources such as repurchase agreements.
Our borrowings from the FHLB include $2.2 billion of putable FHLB advances, which mature in
2012 and 2013, and are callable by the FHLB of Indianapolis during 2010 and thereafter based on
FHLB volatility models. If these advances are called, we will need to find an alternative source
of funding, which could be at a higher cost and, therefore, negatively impact our consolidated
results of operations.
Security Repurchase Agreements. In the second quarter of 2010 we prepaid our entire balance
of security repurchase agreements, totaling $310.6 million. Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase are generally accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at
the amounts at which the securities were sold plus accrued interest. Securities, generally
mortgage backed securities, are pledged as collateral under these financing arrangements. The fair
value of collateral provided to a party is continually monitored, and additional collateral is
obtained or requested to be returned, as appropriate.
74
Long-Term
Debt. As part of our overall capital strategy, we previously raised capital
through the issuance of trust-preferred securities by our special purpose financing entities formed
for the offerings. The trust preferred securities outstanding mature 30 years from issuance, are
callable after five years, and pay interest quarterly. The majority of the net proceeds from these
offerings has been contributed to the Bank as additional paid in capital and subject to regulatory
limitations, is includable as Tier 1 regulatory capital. Under these trust preferred arrangements,
we have the right to defer dividend payments to the trust preferred security holders for up to five
years. Based upon recently-enacted federal banking legislation, trust preferred securities may no
longer be included as part of the Banks Tier 1 capital issued after May 19, 2010, and existing trust preferred
securities may remain includable in Tier 1 capital only if the Bank
had assets of $15 billion or
less at December 31, 2009. On such date, the Bank had assets
below that amounts, and its trust
preferred securities therefore should remain includable in Tier 1 capital even if the Banks assets
subsequently increase above the $15 billion.
Accrued Interest Payable. Accrued interest payable decreased $1.0 million, or 3.7%
to $25.1 million at June 30, 2010 from $26.1 million at December 31, 2009. These amounts represent
interest payments that are payable to depositors and other entities from which we borrowed funds.
These balances fluctuate with the size of our interest-bearing liability portfolio and the average
cost of our interest-bearing liabilities. A significant portion of the decrease was a result of
the decrease in rates on our deposit accounts. For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, the
average overall rate on our deposits decreased 94 basis points to 2.28% from 3.22% for the same
period in 2009. The average balance of our liabilities also decreased during that period by $2.4
billion.
Secondary Market Reserve. We sell most of the residential mortgage loans that we
originate into the secondary mortgage market. When we sell mortgage loans we make customary
representations and warranties to the purchasers about various characteristics of each loan, such
as the manner of origination, the nature and extent of underwriting standards applied and the types
of documentation being provided. Typically these representations and warranties are in place for
the life of the loan. If a defect in the origination process is identified, we may be required to
either repurchase the loan or indemnify the purchaser for losses it sustains on the loan. If there
are no such defects, we have no liability to the purchaser for losses it may incur on such loan.
We maintain a secondary market reserve to account for the expected losses related to loans we might
be required to repurchase (or the indemnity payments we may have to make to purchasers). The
secondary market reserve takes into account both our estimate of expected losses on loans sold
during the current accounting period, as well as adjustments to our previous estimates of expected
losses on loans sold. In each case these estimates are based on our most recent data regarding
loan repurchases, and actual credit losses on repurchased loans, among other factors. Increases to
the secondary market reserve for current loan sales reduce our net gain on loan sales. Adjustments
to our previous estimates are recorded as an increase or decrease in our other fees and charges.
The amount of the secondary market reserve equaled $76.0 million and $66.0 million at June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively. The increase in our secondary market reserve was the result
of the increase in our loss rate during the previous year on repurchases or indemnification to the
purchaser of loans sold and the increase in volume of loans repurchased or indemnified.
Other Liabilities. Other liabilities increased $125.8 million, or 52.9%, to $363.7 million at
June 30, 2010 from $237.9 million at December 31, 2009. In addition, for certain loans sold to
Ginnie Mae, the Company as the servicer, has the unilateral right to repurchase, without Ginnie
Maes prior authorization, any individual loan in a Ginnie Mae securitization pool if that loan
meets certain criteria, including being delinquent greater than 90 days. Once the Company has the
unilateral right to repurchase the delinquent loan, the Company has effectively regained control
over the loan and must, under U.S. GAAP, re-recognize the loan on its
balance sheet, included in loans available for sale and establish a
corresponding repurchase liability on its balance sheet regardless of the Companys intention to
repurchase the loan. The repurchase option asset and corresponding liability, which we include as
part of our other liabilities was $121.2 million at June 30, 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal uses of funds include loan originations and operating expenses, and in the past
also included the payment of dividends and stock repurchases. At June 30, 2010, we had outstanding
rate-lock commitments to lend $3.7 billion in mortgage loans. We have commitments of $0.1 million
for consumer and $0.4 million for second mortgages as of June 30, 2010. These commitments may
expire without being drawn upon and therefore, do not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. Total unused collateralized lines of credit, including construction, consumer,
warehouse, first and second HELOCs and commercial totaled $1.1 billion at June 30, 2010.
We did not pay any cash dividends on our common stock during 2010 and 2009. On February 19,
2008, our Board of Directors suspended future dividends payable on our common stock. Under the
capital distribution regulations, a savings association that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan
holding company must either notify or seek approval from the OTS of an association capital
distribution at least 30 days prior to the declaration of a dividend or the approval by the board
of directors of the proposed capital distribution. The 30-day period allows the OTS to determine
whether the distribution would not be advisable. We currently must seek approval from the OTS
prior to making a capital distribution from the Bank. In addition, we are prohibited from
increasing dividends on our common stock above $0.05 without the consent of Treasury pursuant to
the terms of the TARP.
75
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal
banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative
measures of the Banks assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under
regulatory accounting practices. The Banks capital amounts and classification are also subject to
qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
At June 30, 2010, the Bank was considered well-capitalized for regulatory purposes, with
regulatory capital ratios of 9.24% for Tier 1 capital and 17.20% for total risk-based capital.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our exposure to interest rate risk arises from three distinctly managed mechanisms home
lending, mortgage servicing, and structural balance sheet maturity or repricing mismatches.
In our home lending operations, we are exposed to market risk in the form of interest rate
risk from the time we commit to an interest rate on a mortgage loan application through the time we
sell, or commit to sell, the mortgage loan. On a daily basis, we analyze various economic and
market factors to project the amount of mortgage loans we expect to sell for delivery at a future
date. The actual amount of loans sold will be a percentage of the amount of mortgage loans on
which we have issued binding commitments (and thereby locked in the interest rate) but have not yet
closed (pipeline loans) to actual closings. If interest rates change in an unanticipated
fashion, the actual percentage of pipeline loans that close may differ from the projected
percentage. A mismatch of our commitments to fund mortgage loans and our commitments to sell
mortgage loans may have an adverse effect on the results of operations in any such period. For
instance, a sudden increase in interest rates may cause a higher percentage of pipeline loans to
close than we projected, and thereby exceed our commitments to sell that pipeline of loans. As a
result, we could incur losses upon sale of these additional loans to the extent the market rate of
interest is higher than the mortgage interest rate committed to by us on pipeline loans we had
initially anticipated to close. To the extent that the hedging strategies utilized by us are not
successful, our profitability may be adversely affected.
We also service residential mortgages for various external parties. We receive a service fee
based on the unpaid balances of servicing rights as well as ancillary income (late fees, float on
payments, etc.) as compensation for performing the servicing function. An increase in mortgage
prepayments, as is often associated with declining interest rates, can lead to reduced values on
capitalized mortgage servicing rights and ultimately reduced loan servicing revenues. In the first
quarter of 2008, we began to specifically hedge the market risk associated with mortgage servicing
rights using a portfolio of Treasury note futures and options. To the extent that the hedging
strategies are not effective, our profitability associated with the mortgage servicing activity may
be adversely affected.
In addition to the home lending and mortgage servicing operations, our banking operations may
be exposed to market risk due to differences in the timing of the maturity or repricing of assets
versus liabilities, as well as the potential shift in the yield curve. This risk is evaluated and
managed on a company-wide basis using a net portfolio value (NPV) analysis framework. The NPV
analysis is intended to estimate the net sensitivity of the fair value of the assets and
liabilities to sudden and significant changes in the levels of interest rates.
The following table is a summary of the changes in our Net Portfolio Value (NPV) that are
projected to result from hypothetical changes in market interest rates. NPV is the market value of
assets, less the market value of liabilities, adjusted for the market value of off-balance sheet
instruments. The interest rate scenarios presented in the table include interest rates at June 30,
2010 as adjusted by instantaneous parallel rate changes upward to 300 basis points and downward
to100 basis points. The June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 scenarios are not comparable due to
differences in the interest rate environments, including the absolute level of rates and the shape
of the yield curve. Each rate scenario reflects unique prepayment exceptions, the repricing
characteristics of individual instruments or groups of similar instruments, our historical
experience, and our asset and liability management strategy. Further, this analysis assumes that
certain instruments would not be affected by the changes in interest rates or would be partially
affected due to the characteristics of the instruments.
The analysis is based on our interest rate exposure at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010
and does not contemplate any actions that we might undertake in response to changes in market interest
rates, which could impact NPV. Further, as this framework evaluates risks to the current statement
of financial condition only, changes to the volumes and pricing of new business opportunities that
can be expected in different interest rate outcomes are not incorporated in this analytical
framework.
There are limitations inherent in any methodology used to estimate the exposure to changes in
market interest rates. It is not possible to fully model the market risk in instruments with
leverage, option, or prepayment risks. Also, we are affected by base basis risk, which is the
difference in repricing characteristics of similar term rate indices. As such, this analysis is
not intended to be a precise forecast of the effect a change in market interest rates would have on
us.
While each analysis involves a static model approach to a dynamic operation, the NPV model is
the preferred method.
76
If NPV rises in an up or down interest rate scenario, that would indicate an
up direction for the margin in that hypotheticalrate scenario. A perfectly matched balance sheet
would possess no change in the NPV, no matter what the rate scenario. The following table presents
the NPV in the stated interest rate scenarios (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Scenario |
|
NPV |
|
|
NPV% |
|
|
$Charge |
|
|
%Charge |
|
|
Scenario |
|
|
NPV |
|
|
NPV% |
|
|
$Charge |
|
|
%Charge |
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
$ |
780.6 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
% |
|
$ |
(125.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.8 |
)% |
|
|
300 |
|
|
$ |
269.4 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
$ |
(231.5 |
) |
|
|
(46.2 |
)% |
200 |
|
|
887.9 |
|
|
|
6.57 |
|
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
392.7 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
(108.2 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
100 |
|
|
943.4 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
485.6 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Current |
|
|
905.9 |
|
|
|
6.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
500.9 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-100 |
|
|
853.1 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
|
|
|
(52.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
-100 |
|
|
|
416.4 |
|
|
|
2.96 |
|
|
|
(84.5 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. A review and evaluation was performed by our
principal executive and financial officers regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of June 30, 2010 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that review and evaluation, the principal
executive and financial officers have concluded that our current disclosure controls and
procedures, as designed and implemented, are operating effectively.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls. During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, there has been no
change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation
required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
77
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in response to
Item 1A to
Part I of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,
except as follows:
Financial reform legislation recently signed by the President will, among other things, eliminate
the Office of Thrift Supervision, tighten capital standards, create a new Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau and result in new laws and regulations that are expected to increase our costs of
operations.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) was
signed on July 21, 2010. This new law will significantly change the current bank regulatory
structure and affect the residential mortgage financing industry as
well as, the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of
financial institutions and their holding companies. Various federal agencies must adopt a broad
range of new implementing rules and regulations and are given significant discretion in drafting
the implementing rules and regulations. Consequently, the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be
known for many months or years.
Certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act are expected to have a near term impact on the
Company. For example, the new law provides that the Office of Thrift Supervision, which currently
is the primary federal regulator for the Company and the Bank, will cease to exist one year from
the date of enactment. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which is currently the
primary federal regulator for national banks, will become the primary federal regulator for federal
thrifts including the bank. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System will supervise and
regulate all savings and loan holding companies that were formerly regulated by the Office of
Thrift Supervision, including the Company.
Also effective one year after the date of enactment is a provision of the Dodd-Frank Act that
eliminates the federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits, thus allowing businesses
to have interest bearing checking accounts. Depending on competitive responses, this significant
change to existing law could have an adverse impact on the Companys interest expense.
The Dodd-Frank Act directs the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to redefine the base for
deposit insurance assessments paid by banks from domestic deposits to average consolidated total
assets less tangible equity capital, and the change will affect the deposit insurance fees paid by
the Bank. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the maximum amount of deposit insurance for
banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor. The Dodd-Frank Act also
effectively extends the FDICs program of insuring non-interest bearing transaction accounts on an
unlimited basis through December 31, 2013.
The Dodd-Frank Act creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to
supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad
rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and
savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts and
practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over
all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. The Dodd-Frank Act also
weakens the federal preemption rules that have been applicable for national banks and federal
savings associations, and gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce federal consumer
protection laws.
At this time, it is difficult to predict the overall impact of the Dodd-Frank Act and the
implementing rules and regulations on the Bank. However, it is expected that at a minimum operating
and compliance costs will increase and interest expense could increase.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
Sale of Unregistered Securities |
|
|
|
The Company made no sales of unregistered securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. |
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
The Company made no purchases of its equity securities during the quarter ended June 30,
2010.
|
78
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
79
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
3.1 |
|
Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended |
|
|
|
3.2* |
|
Certificate
of Designation of Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series A of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit
4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of
May 20, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.3* |
|
Certificate
of Designation of Convertible Participating Voting Preferred Stock,
Series B of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of
February 2, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.4* |
|
Certificate
of Designation of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock,
Series C of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of February 2,
2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated herein by reference |
80
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC.
Registrant
|
|
Date: August 9, 2010 |
/s/ Joseph P. Campanelli
|
|
|
Joseph P. Campanelli |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul D. Borja
|
|
|
Paul D. Borja |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
81
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
3.1 |
|
Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended |
|
|
|
3.2* |
|
Certificate
of Designation of Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series A of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit
4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of
May 20, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.3* |
|
Certificate
of Designation of Convertible Participating Voting Preferred Stock,
Series B of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of
February 2, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.4* |
|
Certificate
of Designation of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock,
Series C of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of February 2,
2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated herein by reference |
82