FORM 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission File Number:
001-13057
POLO RALPH LAUREN
CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-2622036
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
650 Madison Avenue, New York,
New York
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
10022
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(212) 318-7000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Class A common stock,
$.01 par value
|
|
New York Stock
Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of
1934. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer (as described in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants voting stock
held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately
$3,908,558,156 as of September 30, 2006, the last business
day of the registrants most recently completed second
fiscal quarter.
At May 18, 2007, 60,677,044 shares of the
registrants Class A common stock, $.01 par value and
43,280,021 shares of the registrants Class B
common stock, $.01 par value were outstanding.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Various statements in this
Form 10-K
or incorporated by reference into this
Form 10-K,
in future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC), in our press releases and in
oral statements made by or with the approval of authorized
personnel constitute forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on current
expectations and are indicated by words or phrases such as
anticipate, estimate,
expect, project, we believe,
is or remains optimistic, currently
envisions and similar words or phrases and involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may
cause actual results, performance or achievements to be
materially different from the future results, performance or
achievements expressed in or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements include statements
regarding, among other items:
|
|
|
|
|
our anticipated growth strategies;
|
|
|
|
our plans to expand internationally;
|
|
|
|
our plans to open new retail stores;
|
|
|
|
our ability to make certain strategic acquisitions of certain
selected licenses held by our licensees;
|
|
|
|
our intention to introduce new products or enter into new
alliances;
|
|
|
|
anticipated effective tax rates in future years;
|
|
|
|
future expenditures for capital projects;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to pay dividends and repurchase
Class A common stock;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to maintain our brand image and
reputation;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to initiate cost cutting efforts and
improve profitability; and
|
|
|
|
our efforts to improve the efficiency of our distribution system.
|
These forward-looking statements are based largely on our
expectations and judgments and are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties, many of which are unforeseeable and beyond
our control. Significant factors that have the potential to
cause our actual results to differ materially from our
expectations are described in this
Form 10-K
under the heading of Risk Factors. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
WEBSITE
ACCESS TO COMPANY REPORTS
Our investor website is http://investor.polo.com. We were
incorporated in June 1997 under the laws of the State of
Delaware. Our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished to the SEC
pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available on our investor
website under the caption SEC Filings promptly after
we electronically file such materials with, or furnish such
materials to, the SEC. Information relating to corporate
governance at Polo, including our Corporate Governance Policies,
our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all directors,
officers, and employees, our Code of Ethics for Principal
Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers, and
information concerning our directors, Committees of the Board,
including Committee charters, and transactions in Polo
securities by directors and executive officers, is available at
our website under the captions Corporate Governance
and SEC Filings. Paper copies of these filings and
corporate governance documents are available to stockholders
without charge by written request to Investor Relations, Polo
Ralph Lauren Corporation, 625 Madison Avenue, New York, New
York 10022.
1
In this
Form 10-K,
references to Polo, ourselves,
we, our, us and the
Company refer to Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and
its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise. Due to
the collaborative and ongoing nature of our relationships with
our licensees, such licensees are sometimes referred to in this
Form 10-K
as licensing alliances. Our fiscal year ends on the
Saturday nearest to March 31. All references to
Fiscal 2007 represent the
52-week
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. All references to
Fiscal 2006 represent the
52-week
fiscal year ended April 1, 2006. All references to
Fiscal 2005 represent the
52-week
fiscal year ended April 2, 2005.
PART I
General
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation is a global leader in the design,
marketing and distribution of premium lifestyle products
including mens, womens and childrens apparel,
accessories, fragrances and home furnishings. We believe that
our global reach, breadth of product and multi-channel
distribution is unique among luxury and apparel companies. We
operate in three distinct but integrated segments: Wholesale,
Retail and Licensing. During the past five years, we have
continued to develop our business model, expand our vertically
integrated Retail segment, reposition our Wholesale segment, and
maintain a strong Licensing segment despite the strategic
acquisition of several of our key licensed businesses. The
following tables show our net revenues and operating profit
(excluding unallocated corporate expenses and legal and
restructuring charges) by segment for the last three fiscal
years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
2,315.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,942.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,712.1
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
1,743.2
|
|
|
|
1,558.6
|
|
|
|
1,348.6
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
236.3
|
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
|
|
244.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,295.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,746.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,305.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
477.8
|
|
|
$
|
398.3
|
|
|
$
|
299.7
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
224.2
|
|
|
|
140.0
|
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
141.6
|
|
|
|
153.5
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
843.6
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
542.0
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses
|
|
|
(183.4
|
)
|
|
|
(159.1
|
)
|
|
|
(133.8
|
)
|
Unallocated legal and
restructuring charges
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
|
|
(108.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$
|
652.6
|
|
|
$
|
516.6
|
|
|
$
|
299.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net revenues by geographic region for the last three years
are shown in the tables below. Note 20 to our accompanying
audited consolidated financial statements included in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains additional segment and geographic area information.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Canada
|
|
$
|
3,452.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,032.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,581.2
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
767.9
|
|
|
|
627.7
|
|
|
|
579.2
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
Other regions
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,295.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,746.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,305.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continue to invest in our business. In the past five years,
we have invested approximately $1.6 billion for the
acquisition of several key licensed businesses and capital
improvements, all fundamentally through strong operating cash
flow. We intend to continue to execute our long-term strategy of
expanding our accessories and other product offerings, growing
our specialty retail store base, and expanding our presence
internationally.
Seasonality
of Business
Our business is affected by seasonal trends, with greater
Wholesale segment sales in our second and fourth quarters and
greater Retail segment sales in our second and third quarters.
These trends result primarily from the timing of seasonal
wholesale shipments and key vacation travel, back to school and
holiday shopping periods in the Retail segment. As a result of
the growth in our retail operations and other changes in our
business, historical quarterly operating trends and working
capital requirements may not be indicative of future
performances. In addition, fluctuations in sales and operating
income in any fiscal quarter may be affected by, among other
things, the timing of seasonal wholesale shipments and other
events affecting retail sales.
Recent
Developments
Japanese
Business Acquisitions
On May 29, 2007, we completed our tender offer which was
commenced on April 17, 2007, in an effort to acquire in Yen
the approximately 80% of the outstanding shares of Impact 21
Co., Ltd (Impact 21), a Japanese corporation, that
we did not previously own (the Tender Offer). Impact
21 is our
sub-licensee
for mens, womens and jeans apparel and accessories
in Japan. The successful completion of the Tender Offer allows
us to enhance and expand our market distribution and product
assortment in Japan, which is consistent with our overall
objectives to grow our business internationally.
As part of the Tender Offer, Onward Kashiyama Co. Ltd
(Onward Kashiyama) and its affiliates sold their
approximately 41% ownership interest in Impact 21 to us. We also
acquired approximately 36% of the issued and outstanding shares
of Impact 21 held by the public, resulting in a total ownership
level of approximately 97%. Under Japanese law, once we own
two-thirds (2/3) or more of the aggregate voting rights of
Impact 21, we would effectively control Impact 21 and may
determine almost all matters subject to a vote of the
shareholders of the Company. We intend to acquire the remaining
approximately 3% of Impact 21s shares not tendered as of
May 29, 2007 and held by Impact 21s remaining
shareholders for cash during the second quarter of Fiscal 2008.
The total acquisition cost (excluding transaction costs) to
acquire the approximately 80% of the outstanding shares of
Impact 21 not already owned by us is expected to be
approximately $340 million. Of this amount, we paid
approximately $327 million as of May 29, 2007 in
conjunction with the completion of the Tender Offer. We will
finance the total acquisition cost using cash on hand and an
approximate $170 million short-term loan provided to us by
several financial institutions (the Term Loan). We
expect to repay the borrowings under the Term Loan using cash
available at Impact 21 within the next 12 months. See
Item 7 Financial Condition and
Liquidity for further discussion of the Term Loan.
The results of operations for Impact 21 will be consolidated as
of April 1, 2007, the beginning of the annual fiscal period
in which effective control was obtained for accounting purposes.
We will report minority interest for
3
the amount of Impact 21s net income allocable to the
holders of the approximately 3% of Impact 21 shares not
owned by us prior to May 29, 2007. In connection with the
Tender Offer, we and Onward Kashiyama entered into a transition
services agreement for Onward Kashiyama to provide a variety of
operational, distribution and human resource-related services
over a period of up to 2 years effective upon consummation
of the Tender Offer. In addition, we will lease certain
facilities from Onward Kashiyama.
Also on May 29, 2007, we acquired the remaining 50%
interest in Polo Ralph Lauren Japan Corporation (PRL
Japan), a Japanese corporation, which was held by Onward
Kashiyama and The Seibu Department Stores, Ltd.
(Seibu). PRL Japan is our Japanese master licensee.
We acquired PRL Japan for approximately $22 million in
cash, excluding transaction costs, using cash on hand. We
previously consolidated the results of PRL Japan as the primary
beneficiary. As a result, commencing on May 29, 2007, we
will report 100% of the net income of PRL Japan.
Acquisition
of Small Leathergoods Business
On April 13, 2007, we acquired from Kellwood Company
(Kellwood) substantially all of the assets of New
Campaign, Inc., our licensee for mens and womens
belts and other small leather goods under the Ralph Lauren,
Lauren and Chaps brands in the U.S. The assets acquired
from Kellwood will become a division of ours which has been
renamed Polo Ralph Lauren Leathergoods. The asset
purchase cost was approximately $10 million and is subject
to customary closing adjustments. Under a transition services
agreement, Kellwood will provide us with various transition
services for up to six months after consummation of the asset
purchase transaction.
The results of operations for the Polo Ralph Lauren Leathergoods
business will be consolidated in our results of operations
commencing in Fiscal 2008.
Acquisition
of RL Media Minority Interest
On March 28, 2007, we acquired the remaining 50% equity
interest in Ralph Lauren Media, LLC (RL Media) held
37.5% by NBC-Lauren Media Holdings, Inc. (a subsidiary
wholly-owned by the National Broadcasting Company, Inc.) and
12.5% by Value Vision Media, Inc. (Value Vision),
giving us full ownership of RL Media. Commencing in Fiscal 2008,
we will report 100% of the net income of RL Media. RL Media was
established in 2000 to develop Polo Ralph Lauren branded media
projects across multiple platforms. Today, RL Media conducts our
e-commerce
initiatives through the Polo.com internet site and is
consolidated by us as the primary beneficiary. The acquisition
was a cash transaction of $175 million.
Formation
of Ralph Lauren Watch and Jewelry Joint Venture
On March 5, 2007, we announced that we had agreed to form a
joint venture with Financiere Richemont SA
(Richemont), the Swiss Luxury Goods Group. The
50-50 joint
venture will be a Swiss corporation (or société à
responsabilité limitee) named the Ralph Lauren Watch and
Jewelry Company, S.A.R.L., (the RL Watch Company)
and the joint ventures purpose is to design, develop,
manufacture, sell and distribute luxury watches and fine jewelry
through Ralph Lauren boutiques, as well as through fine
independent jewelry and luxury watch retailers throughout the
world. The RL Watch Company is expected to commence operations
during the first quarter of Fiscal 2008 and it is expected that
the products will be launched in the fall of calendar 2008. We
expect to account for our 50% interest in the RL Watch Company
under the equity method of accounting. Royalty payments due to
us under the related license agreement for use of certain of our
trademarks will be reflected as licensing revenue within the
consolidated statement of operations.
Global
Brand Concepts and Launch of American Living
On January 8, 2007, we announced that we will begin to
develop new lifestyle brands for specialty and department stores
through our Global Brand Concepts (GBC) group. The
GBC group will work in partnership with select department and
specialty stores to contribute its expertise in design,
operations, marketing, merchandising and advertising in
developing exclusive brands for these stores. Consistent with
this strategic initiative, on February 1, 2007, we
announced plans to launch American Living, a new
lifestyle brand created exclusively for J.C. Penney
Company, Inc. (JCPenney). American Living
products will be available in JCPenneys stores and catalog
beginning in the spring of calendar 2008 and will include a full
range of merchandise for women, men and children, as well as
intimate apparel, accessories and home products.
4
Our
Brands and Products
Since 1967, our distinctive brand image has been consistently
developed across an expanding number of products, price tiers
and markets. Our Polo, Polo by Ralph Lauren, Ralph Lauren
Purple Label, Ralph Lauren Black Label, RLX, Ralph Lauren Blue
Label, Lauren, RRL, Rugby, Chaps, Club Monaco and
American Living brand names are one of the worlds
most widely recognized families of consumer brands. We have been
an innovator in aspirational lifestyle branding and believe
that, under the direction of Ralph Lauren, the internationally
renowned designer, we have influenced the manner in which people
dress and live in contemporary society, reflecting an American
perspective and lifestyle uniquely associated with Polo and
Ralph Lauren. We combine our consumer insight and design,
marketing and imaging skills to offer, along with our licensing
alliances, broad lifestyle product collections with a unified
vision:
|
|
|
|
|
Apparel Products include extensive
collections of mens, womens and childrens
clothing;
|
|
|
|
Accessories Accessories encompass a broad
range of products such as footwear, eyewear, jewelry and leather
goods, including handbags and luggage;
|
|
|
|
Home Coordinated products for the home
include bedding and bath products, furniture, fabric and
wallpaper, paints, broadloom, tabletop and giftware; and
|
|
|
|
Fragrance Fragrance products are sold under
our Glamorous, Romance, Polo, Lauren, Safari, Blue Label and
Black Label brands, among others.
|
Domestically, our Rugby, Blue Label for women and Black Label
for men brands are sold primarily in our own retail specialty
stores. Our lifestyle brand image is reinforced by our Polo.com
internet site, which averaged 2.3 million unique visitors
to the site each month during Fiscal 2007 and 1.1 million
customers during Fiscal 2007.
Polo by Ralph Lauren. Classic and
authentic, Polo by Ralph Lauren is the foundation of the world
of Ralph Lauren menswear with its comprehensive line of
mens sportswear, tailored clothing and accessories. It is
generally priced at a range of price points within the
mens premium
ready-to-wear
apparel market. We currently sell this collection worldwide
through Ralph Lauren stores, department stores, specialty stores
and online at Polo.com.
Blue Label. Classic and authentic with
a sexy, youthful spirit, Blue Label embodies the Ralph Lauren
sensibility through heritage looks with a fresh modern twist.
Inspired by the style and authenticity of Polo, Blue Label
offers women the perfect weekend look. Blue Label collection is
generally priced at a range of price points within the premium
ready-to-wear
apparel market. We currently sell the Blue Label collection
domestically and internationally through Ralph Lauren stores and
select wholesale accounts in Europe and Asia. In Japan, our Blue
Label line is sold under the Ralph Lauren brand name.
Polo Golf. Rooted in the design
heritage of Ralph Lauren, Polo Golf and Ralph Lauren Golf
feature luxury technical performance wear for men and women that
travels effortlessly between the course and the clubhouse. Polo
Golf and Ralph Lauren Golf compete with the highest-quality
providers of mens and womens golf apparel. Price
points are similar to those charged for products in the Polo by
Ralph Lauren line. We sell the Polo Golf collection in the U.S.,
Canada and Europe through leading golf clubs, pro shops and
resorts, as well as department stores, specialty stores and
Ralph Lauren stores.
RLX. Created to answer the demands of
dedicated athletes for superior high-performance outfitting, RLX
provides gear that unites the highest standards of quality,
design and technology. The result is a line of cutting edge
athletic fashion with an unmistakable respect for functionality
in winter sports, tennis, golf, sailing and cycling. We
currently sell RLX domestically and in Europe only in our Ralph
Lauren stores.
Ralph Lauren Childrenswear. Reflecting
the timeless spirit of Ralph Lauren, our Childrenswear
collections provide classic style for kids of all ages: layette
and toddler to girls ages 2 to 13 and boys ages 2 to
15. The collections feature seasonal styles as well as the full
range of Ralph Lauren icons, including classic polos, oxford
shirts, navy blazers and our unsurpassed cashmere. We offer a
comprehensive collection of both Boys and Girls apparel and
accessories that are sold worldwide through Ralph Lauren stores
as well as to better specialty and department stores.
5
Lauren by Ralph Lauren. Created to
broaden the reach of the Ralph Lauren womens statement,
Lauren conveys a spirit of heritage and tradition while
recalling the sophisticated luxury of Black Label. Timeless and
perfectly polished, Lauren suits, sportswear and outerwear
provide ideal combinations for every occasion, while Lauren
Active infuses a country club sensibility into practical sports
apparel, creating fashionable wardrobe solutions for golf,
tennis, yoga or weekend wear. Lauren by Ralph Lauren is
generally priced at a range of price points within the
womens better
ready-to-wear
apparel market. Lauren is sold in department stores domestically
and in Canada and online at Polo.com.
Womens Ralph Lauren
Collection. The crown jewel of Ralph Lauren
womenswear, Collection makes its dramatic first appearance each
season on the runways of New York, providing the fashion world
with the definitive Ralph Lauren style statement for the season.
Embodying opulent sophistication, Collections distinctive
couture sensibility is expressed though modern yet timeless
silhouettes expertly crafted from the finest luxury
fabrics reflecting the epitome of bold femininity
and rarefied chic as only Ralph Lauren can express it. Ralph
Lauren Collection is sold primarily in Ralph Lauren stores.
Select pieces are also available through specialty stores, the
finest department stores and online at Polo.com.
Womens Black Label. Sophisticated
and classic with a modern edge, Black Label translates the
luxurious spirit of Ralph Lauren into a distinctive, timeless
collection of icons for town, country, day and evening. Created
from the finest materials, the silhouettes of Black
Label striking, sexy and elegant are the
cornerstones of the Ralph Lauren womans wardrobe. Black
Label is sold among the finest collections sold throughout the
world, in designer boutiques, better department stores, fine
specialty stores and primarily, in Ralph Lauren stores. Select
pieces are also available online at Polo.com.
Mens Purple Label Collection. A
contemporary take on traditional bespoke tailoring, Ralph Lauren
Purple Label is the ultimate expression of modern elegance for
men. From perfectly tailored suits to ultra-sophisticated
sportswear, Purple Label reflects an impeccable sense of the
dashing and refined, calling for the most luxurious fabrics,
precise finishes and expert craftsmanship in the spirit of the
finest Savile Row tailoring and European hand workmanship. Ralph
Lauren Purple Label is sold primarily in Ralph Lauren stores,
but is also available through specialty stores, fine department
stores and online at Polo.com. We sell the Purple Label
collection through our Ralph Lauren stores and a limited number
of premier fashion retailers at price points at the upper end of
the luxury range.
Mens Black Label. Reflecting a
sharp, modern attitude, Ralph Lauren Black Label is a
sophisticated new collection for men. Featuring razor-sharp
tailoring and dramatically lean silhouettes, the look is at once
modern and timeless. Classic suiting and sportswear is infused
with a savvier attitude. Iconic yet fresh, the line represents a
new chapter in mens style that is the essence of modern
elegance. We sell the Mens Black Label collection through
our Ralph Lauren stores and a limited number of premier fashion
retailers at price points at the upper end of the luxury range.
Rugby. Rugby is a relatively new store
and brand concept by Ralph Lauren created for the next
generation of Polo customers. It is a vertical retail division
that targets a twenty-something young professional dual gender
customer base. The concept has also shown elasticity both
younger and older, but varies by store. Rooted in the preppy Ivy
League sensibility at the heart of Ralph Lauren heritage, Rugby
combines sporty prep-school looks with city savvy to create a
youthful, energetic collection of sportswear. From edgy,
rebellious, sport-inspired looks for men to sharp, sexy, urban
campus styles for women, Rugby embraces a lasting sense of
timeless individuality.
Club Monaco. Club Monaco is a dynamic,
international retail concept that designs, manufactures and
markets its own Club Monaco clothing and accessories. Each
season, Club Monaco offers mens and womens updated
classics and key fashion pieces that are the foundation of a
modern wardrobe. The brands signature clean and modern
style gives classics an update through great design and a
current sensibility. Club Monaco is the lifestyle destination
for todays urban professional. Currently, Club Monaco
operates 64 stores throughout North America and, through
licensing arrangements, has recently opened stores in Hong Kong,
Seoul and Dubai.
American Living. American Living will
be the first brand launched under the new Global Brand Concepts
group. American Living will be exclusive to JCPenney in the U.S.
and is expected to be launched in February of
6
2008 in more than 650 JCPenney stores as well as the catalog and
online. American Living will be a full lifestyle
offering mens, womens, childrens,
accessories and home.
Chaps. The Chaps brand does not carry
the Ralph Lauren name, but its mission is to deliver the design
heritage and advertising images of the Company to a broader
consumer base in the mid-tier distribution channel and select
independent department stores. Chaps reflects an updated
interpretation of classic American styling from the house of
Ralph Lauren, in full lifestyle collections in the mens,
womens, childrens, accessory and home product
categories.
Our
Wholesale Segment
Our Wholesale segment sells our products to leading upscale and
certain mid-tier department stores, specialty stores and golf
and pro shops, both domestically and internationally. We have
focused on elevating our brand and improving productivity by
reducing the number of unproductive doors within department
stores in which our products are sold, improving in-store
product assortment and presentation, and improving full-price
sell-throughs to consumers. As of March 31, 2007, the end
of Fiscal 2007, our products were sold through 8,291 domestic
doors, and during Fiscal 2007, we invested approximately
$32 million in shop-within-shops dedicated to our products
in domestic department stores. We have also effected selective
price increases on basic products and introduced new fashion
offerings at higher price points.
Department stores are our major wholesale customers in North
America. In Europe, our wholesale sales are a varying mix of
sales to both department stores and specialty shops, depending
on the country. Our collection brands Womens
Ralph Lauren Collection and Black Label and Mens Purple
Label Collection and Black Label are distributed
through a limited number of premier fashion retailers. In
addition, we sell excess and
out-of-season
products through secondary distribution channels.
Worldwide
Distribution Channels
The following table presents the approximate number of doors by
geographic location, in which products distributed by our
Wholesale segment were sold to consumers as of March 31,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Number of
|
|
Location
|
|
Doors as of March 31,
2007(a)
|
|
|
United States and Canada
|
|
|
8,291
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In Asia/Pacific, our products are
distributed by our licensing partners.
|
The following department store chains were the only wholesale
customers whose purchases represented more than 10% of our
worldwide wholesale net sales for the year ended March 31,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Federated Department Stores, Inc., which represented
approximately 29%; and
|
|
|
|
Dillard Department Stores, Inc., which represented approximately
14%.
|
Our product brands are sold primarily through their own sales
forces. Our Wholesale segment maintains their primary showrooms
in New York City. In addition, we maintain regional showrooms in
Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, Milan, Paris, London,
Munich, Madrid and Stockholm.
Shop-within-Shops. As a critical
element of our distribution to department stores, we and our
licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand
recognition, to permit more complete merchandising of our lines
by the department stores and to differentiate the presentation
of products. Shop-within-shops fixed assets primarily include
items such as customized freestanding fixtures, moveable wall
cases and components, decorative items and flooring.
7
As of March 31, 2007, we had approximately 10,600
shop-within-shops dedicated to our wholesale products worldwide
and our licensing partners had more than 600 shop-within-shops.
During Fiscal 2007, we added approximately 1,300
shop-within-shops. Excluding significantly larger
shop-within-shops in key department store locations, the size of
our shop-within-shops typically ranges from approximately 100 to
4,800 square feet. We share in the cost of these
shop-within-shops.
Basic Stock Replenishment
Program. Basic products such as knit shirts,
chino pants and oxford cloth shirts can be ordered at any time
through our basic stock replenishment programs. We generally
ship these products within one to five days of order receipt.
These products accounted for approximately 6% of our wholesale
net sales in Fiscal 2007.
Our
Retail Segment
Our Retail segment consists of 147 full-price retail stores and
145 factory stores worldwide as of March 31, 2007. The
expansion of our full-price retail store base is a primary
long-term strategic goal. We opened 10 new full-price stores in
Fiscal 2007 and currently anticipate opening between 10 and 15
full-price stores in Fiscal 2008. Our retail operating profit
rate increased from 3.0% of net sales in Fiscal 2001 to 12.9% of
net sales in Fiscal 2007, reflecting improvements in
productivity, gross margins, and full-margin sell-through rates.
Our full-price retail stores reinforce the luxury image and
distinct sensibility of our brands and feature exclusive lines
that are not sold in domestic department stores: Blue Label for
Women, Black Label for Men and Ralph Lauren Home. We operated
the following full-price retail stores as of March 31, 2007:
Full-Price
Retail Stores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph
|
|
|
Club
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Lauren
|
|
|
Monaco
|
|
|
Rugby
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
United States and Canada
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph Lauren stores feature the full-breadth of the Ralph
Lauren apparel, accessory and home product assortments in an
atmosphere reflecting the distinctive attitude and luxury
positioning of the Ralph Lauren brand. Our seven flagship Ralph
Lauren stores showcase our upper-end luxury styles and products
and demonstrate our most refined merchandising techniques.
|
|
|
|
Club Monaco stores feature updated fashion apparel and
accessories for both men and women. The brands clean and
updated classic signature style forms the foundation of a modern
wardrobe.
|
|
|
|
Rugby is a vertical retail format featuring an
aspirational lifestyle collection of apparel and accessories for
men and women. The brand is characterized by a youthful, preppy
attitude which resonates throughout the line and the store
experience.
|
In addition to generating sales of our products, our worldwide
full-price stores set, reinforce and capitalize on the image of
our brands. Our stores range in size from approximately 600 to
over 37,500 square feet. These full-price stores are
situated in upscale regional malls and major upscale street
locations, generally in large urban markets. We generally lease
our stores for initial periods ranging from 5 to 10 years
with renewal options.
We extend our reach to additional consumer groups through our
145 Polo Ralph Lauren factory stores worldwide. During Fiscal
2007, we added 1 new Polo Ralph Lauren factory store, net, and
closed our remaining
8
Club Monaco factory stores. Our factory stores are generally
located in outlet malls. We operated the following factory
retail stores as of March 31, 2007:
Factory
Retail Stores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph
|
|
Location
|
|
Lauren
|
|
|
United States and Canada
|
|
|
123
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
21
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polo Ralph Lauren factory stores offer selections of our
menswear, womenswear, childrens apparel, accessories, home
furnishings and fragrances. Ranging in size from 1,500 to
20,000 square feet, with an average of approximately
9,100 square feet, these stores are principally located in
major outlet centers in 36 states and Puerto Rico.
|
|
|
|
European factory stores offer selections of our menswear,
womenswear, childrens apparel, accessories, home
furnishings and fragrances. Ranging in size from 2,400 to
13,200 square feet, with an average of approximately
6,400 square feet, these stores are located in 6 countries,
principally in major outlet centers.
|
Factory stores obtain products from our retail stores, our
product licensing partners and our suppliers.
Polo.com
In addition to our stores, our Retail segment sells Ralph Lauren
products on-line through our
e-commerce
website, Polo.com (http://www.polo.com). Polo.com offers our
customers access to the full breadth of Ralph Lauren apparel,
accessories and home products, and allows us to reach retail
customers on a multi-channel basis and reinforces the luxury
image of our brands. In Fiscal 2007, Polo.com averaged
2.3 million unique visitors a month and had
1.1 million customers. Polo.com is owned and operated by RL
Media. See Recent Developments for a
discussion of the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity
interest in RL Media.
Our
Licensing Segment
Through licensing alliances, we combine our consumer insight,
design, and marketing skills with the specific product or
geographic competencies of our licensing partners to create and
build new businesses. We generally seek out licensing partners
who:
|
|
|
|
|
are leaders in their respective markets;
|
|
|
|
contribute the majority of the product development costs;
|
|
|
|
provide the operational infrastructure required to support the
business; and
|
|
|
|
own the inventory.
|
We grant our product licensees the right to manufacture and sell
at wholesale specified categories of products under one or more
of our trademarks. We grant our international geographic area
licensing partners exclusive rights to distribute certain brands
or classes of our products and operate retail stores in specific
international territories. These geographic area licensees
source products from us, our product licensing partners and
independent sources. Each licensing partner pays us royalties
based upon its sales of our products, subject, generally, to a
minimum royalty requirement for the right to use the Polo
trademark and design services. In addition, licensing partners
may be required to allocate a portion of their sales revenues to
advertise our products and share in the creative costs
associated with these products. Larger allocations are required
in connection with launches of new products or in new
territories. Our licenses generally have 3 to
5-year terms
and may grant the licensee conditional renewal options. See
Item 7 Recent Developments
for a discussion of our Eyewear Licensing Agreement.
9
We work closely with our licensing partners to ensure that their
products are developed, marketed and distributed so as to reach
the intended market opportunity and to present consistently to
consumers worldwide the distinctive perspective and lifestyle
associated with our brands. Virtually all aspects of the design,
production quality, packaging, merchandising, distribution,
advertising and promotion of Polo Ralph Lauren products are
subject to our prior approval and continuing oversight. The
result is a consistent identity for Polo Ralph Lauren products
across product categories and international markets.
Approximately 22% of our licensing revenue for Fiscal 2007 was
derived from two product licensing partners: Impact 21, one
of the sublicensees for Japan, and WestPoint Home, Inc,
accounted for 14% and 8%, respectively, of our licensing revenue
in Fiscal 2007. See Recent Developments for a
discussion of the Tender Offer to acquire Impact 21.
Product
Licenses
The following table lists our principal product licensing
agreements for mens and womens sportswear,
mens tailored clothing, intimate apparel, accessories and
fragrances as of March 31, 2007. The products offered by
these licensing partners are listed below. Except as noted in
the table, these product licenses cover the U.S. or
North America only.
|
|
|
Licensing Partner
|
|
Licensed Product
Category
|
|
LOreal S.A./Cosmair, Inc.
(global)
|
|
Mens and Womens
Fragrances, Cosmetics, Color and Skin Care Products
|
Carole Hochman Design
|
|
Lauren and Chaps Womens
Sleepwear, Loungewear and Robes
|
Corneliani S.P.A. (includes Europe)
|
|
Mens Polo Tailored Clothing
|
Peerless, Inc
|
|
Mens, Chaps, Lauren and
Ralph Tailored Clothing
|
Hanes Brands (formerly Sara Lee
Corporation)
|
|
Mens Polo Ralph Lauren
Intimate Apparel
|
Wathne Imports, Ltd.
|
|
Handbags and Luggage
|
Renfro Corporation (formerly Hot
Sox, Inc. which was acquired by Renfro Corporation in May 2007)
|
|
Mens and Boys Polo
Ralph Lauren and Womens Ralph Lauren and Lauren and
Boys Hosiery
|
New Campaign, Inc.*
|
|
Polo, Chaps, Ralph Lauren and
Lauren Belts and Other Small Leather Goods
|
Echo Scarves, Inc.
|
|
Mens Polo Ralph Lauren and
Womens Ralph Lauren and Lauren Scarves and Gloves
|
Retail Brand Alliance, Inc.
(successor to Carolee, Inc.)
|
|
Lauren Womens Jewelry
|
Luxottica Group, S.p.A
|
|
Eyewear
|
The Warnaco Group, Inc.
|
|
Mens Chaps Sportswear
|
Apparel Ventures, Inc.
|
|
Womens Ralph Lauren, Lauren
and Chaps Swimwear
|
Philips Van-Heusen Corporation
|
|
Mens Chaps Dress Shirts
|
Randa Corp
|
|
Mens Chaps Ties and
Boys Chaps Ties, Belts and Small Leather Goods
|
Bandanco Enterprise, Inc. (as of
May 24, 2007 owned by Randa Corp.)
|
|
Mens Chaps Luggage
|
Crystal Hosiery, Inc.
|
|
Womens Chaps Hosiery
|
Rosetti Handbags and Accessories,
Ltd.
|
|
Womens Chaps Handbags and
Small Leather Goods
|
Swank, Inc.
|
|
Mens Chaps Jewelry and
Giftables
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
On April 13, 2007, we acquired
substantially all of the assets of New Campaign from Kellwood.
See Recent Developments for further
discussion.
|
10
International
Licenses
We believe that international markets offer additional
opportunities for our quintessential American designs and
lifestyle image. We work with our international licensing
partners to facilitate international growth in their respective
territories. International expansion/growth opportunities may
include:
|
|
|
|
|
the roll out of new products and brands following their launch
in the U.S.;
|
|
|
|
the introduction of additional product lines;
|
|
|
|
the entrance into new international markets;
|
|
|
|
the addition of Ralph Lauren or Polo Ralph Lauren stores in
these markets; and
|
|
|
|
the expansion and upgrade of
shop-in-shop
networks in these markets.
|
The following table identifies our largest international area
licensing partners (excluding Ralph Lauren Home licensees) for
Fiscal 2007:
|
|
|
Licensing Partner
|
|
Territory
|
|
Oroton Group/PRL Australia
|
|
Australia and New Zealand
|
Doosan Corporation
|
|
Korea
|
P.R.L. Enterprises, S.A.
|
|
Panama, Aruba, Curacao, The Cayman
Islands, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador,
Guatemala, Belize, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, Peru, Antigua,
Barbados, Bonaire, Dominican Republic, St. Lucia, Trinidad and
Tobago
|
Dickson Concepts/PRL Hong Kong
|
|
Hong Kong, China, Philippines,
Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand
|
PRL Japan*
|
|
Japan
|
Commercial Madison/PRL Chile
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
PRL Japan operates principally
through sublicensees, including Impact 21, mens and
womens apparel and accessories and Polo Jeans, Naigai,
childrens and golf apparel and hosiery, and Hitomi casual
wear. See Recent Developments for a
discussion of the Tender Offer to acquire Impact 21 as well as
the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in PRL Japan.
|
Our international licensing partners acquire the right to
distribute, sell, promote, market
and/or
distribute various categories of our products in a given
geographic area. These rights may include the right to own and
operate retail stores. The economic arrangements are similar to
those of our product licensing partners. We design licensed
products either alone or in collaboration with our domestic
licensing partners. Our product licensees whose territories do
not include the international geographic area licensees
territories generally provide our international licensing
partners with product or patterns, piece goods, manufacturing
locations and other information and assistance necessary to
achieve product uniformity, for which they are often compensated.
As of March 31, 2007, our international licensing partners
operated 4 Ralph Lauren stores, 35 Polo Ralph Lauren
stores, 27 Polo Jeans stores, 3 Childrens stores and 11
Polo factory stores.
Ralph
Lauren Home
Together with our licensing partners, we offer an extensive
collection of home products that draw upon and further the
design themes of our other product lines, contributing to our
complete lifestyle concept. Products are sold under the Ralph
Lauren Home, Lauren Ralph Lauren and Chaps brands in three
primary categories: bedding and bath, home décor and home
improvement. As of March 31, 2007, we had agreements with 9
domestic and 2 international home product licensing
partners and one international home product sublicensing partner.
We perform a broader range of services for our Ralph Lauren Home
licensing partners than we do for our other licensing partners.
These services include design, operating showrooms, marketing,
advertising and, in some cases, sales. In general, the licensing
partners manufacture, own the inventory and ship the products.
Our Ralph Lauren Home licensing alliances generally have 3 to
5-year terms
and may grant the licensee conditional renewal options.
11
Ralph Lauren Home products are positioned at the upper tiers of
their respective markets and are offered at a range of price
levels. These products are generally distributed through several
channels of distribution, including department stores, specialty
home furnishings stores, interior design showrooms, customer
direct mail catalogs, home centers and the Internet, as well as
our own stores. As with our other products, the use of
shop-within-shops is central to our department store
distribution strategy.
The Ralph Lauren Home, Lauren Ralph Lauren and Chaps home
products offered by us and our product licensing partners are:
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
Product
|
|
Licensing Partner
|
|
Bedding and Bath
|
|
Sheets, bedding accessories,
towels and shower curtains, blankets, down comforters, other
decorative bedding and accessories
|
|
WestPoint Home, Inc.
Fremaux-Delorme, Ichida
|
|
|
Bath rugs
|
|
Bacova Guild, Ltd.
|
Home Décor
|
|
Fabric and wallpaper
|
|
P. Kaufmann, Inc.
Designers Guild Ltd.
|
|
|
Furniture
|
|
HDM Furniture Industries, Inc.
|
|
|
Tabletop and giftware, Table
linens, placemats, tablecloths and napkins
|
|
American Commercial, Inc.,
Town & Country Linen Corp
|
Home Improvement
|
|
Interior paints and stains,
Broadloom carpets and area rugs
|
|
The Glidden Company, Karastan, a
division of Mohawk Carpet Corporation
|
WestPoint Home, Inc. offers a basic stock replenishment program
that includes bath and bedding products and accounted for
approximately 77% of the net sales of Ralph Lauren Home products
in Fiscal 2007. WestPoint Home, Inc. accounted for approximately
47% of total Ralph Lauren Home licensing revenue in Fiscal 2007.
Product
Design
Our products reflect a timeless and innovative American style
associated with and defined by Ralph Lauren and our design team.
Our consistent emphasis on innovative and distinctive design has
been an important contributor to the prominence, strength and
reputation of the Ralph Lauren brands.
All Ralph Lauren products are designed by, or under the
direction of, Ralph Lauren and our design staff, which is
divided into nine departments: Menswear, Womens
Collection, Womens ready to wear, Dresses,
Childrens, Accessories, Home, Club Monaco and Rugby. We
form design teams around our brands and product categories to
develop concepts, themes and products for each brand and
category. These teams support all three segments of our
business Wholesale, Retail and Licensing
through close collaboration with merchandising, sales and
production staff and licensing partners in order to gain market
and other input.
Marketing
Our marketing program communicates the themes and images of our
brands and is an integral feature of our product offering.
Worldwide marketing is managed on a centralized basis through
our advertising and public relations departments in order to
ensure consistency of presentation.
We create distinctive image advertising for all of our products,
conveying the particular message of each brand within the
context of our core themes. Advertisements generally portray a
lifestyle rather than a specific item and include a variety of
products offered by ourselves and, in some cases, our licensing
partners. Our primary advertising medium is print, with multiple
page advertisements appearing regularly in a range of fashion,
lifestyle and general interest magazines. Major print
advertising campaigns are conducted during the fall and spring
retail seasons, with additions throughout the year to coincide
with product deliveries. In addition to print, some product
12
categories have utilized television and outdoor media in their
marketing programs for certain product categories. Our Polo.com
e-commerce
website presents the Ralph Lauren lifestyle on the Internet
while offering the full breadth of our apparel, accessories and
home products.
If our domestic licensing partners are required to spend an
amount equal to a percent of their licensed product sales on
advertising, we coordinate the advertising placement on their
behalf.
We also conduct a variety of public relations activities. Each
of our spring and fall womenswear collections are presented at
major fashion shows in New York City, which typically generate
extensive domestic and international media coverage. We
introduce each of the spring and fall menswear collections at
major fashion shows in cities such as New York or Milan, Italy.
In addition, we organize in-store appearances by our models,
professional golfers and sponsors. We are the first exclusive
outfitter for all on-court officials at Wimbledon through 2010.
We are also the official outfitter of all on-court officials at
the U.S. Open tennis tournament through 2009.
Sourcing,
Production and Quality
We contract for the manufacture of our products and do not own
or operate any production facilities. Over 350 different
manufacturers worldwide produce our apparel, footwear and
accessories products. We source both finished products and raw
materials. Raw materials include fabric, buttons and other trim.
Finished products consist of manufactured and fully assembled
products ready for shipment to our customers. In Fiscal 2007,
less than 1%, by dollar volume, of our products were produced in
the U.S., and over 99%, by dollar volume, were produced outside
the U.S., primarily in Asia, Europe and South America. See
Import Restrictions and other Government
Regulations and Part 1A Our
business is subject to government regulations and other risks
associated with importing products.
Two manufacturers engaged by us accounted for approximately 12%
and 8% of our total production during Fiscal 2007, respectively.
The primary production facilities of these two manufacturers are
located in China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Macau, Philippines,
Saipan and Sri Lanka.
Our Wholesale segment must commit to manufacture the majority of
our garments before we receive customer orders. We also must
commit to purchase fabric from mills well in advance of our
sales. If we overestimate our primary customers demand for
a particular product, we may sell the excess in our factory
stores or sell the product through secondary distribution
channels. If we overestimate the need for a particular fabric or
yarn, that fabric or yarn may be used in garments made for
subsequent seasons or made into past seasons styles for
distribution in our factory stores.
Suppliers operate under the close supervision of our global
manufacturing division and buying agents headquartered in Asia,
the Americas and Europe. All garments are produced according to
our specifications. Production and quality control staff in the
Americas, Asia and Europe monitor manufacturing at supplier
facilities in order to correct problems prior to shipment of the
final product. Procedures have been implemented under our vendor
certification and compliance programs, so that quality assurance
is focused upon as early as possible in the production process,
allowing merchandise to be received at the distribution
facilities and shipped to customers with minimal interruption.
Competition
Competition is very strong in the segments of the fashion and
consumer product industries in which we operate. We compete with
numerous designers and manufacturers of apparel and accessories,
fragrances and home furnishing products, domestic and foreign.
Some of our competitors may be significantly larger and have
substantially greater resources than us. We compete primarily on
the basis of fashion, quality and service, which depend on our
ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
anticipate and respond to changing consumer demands in a timely
manner;
|
|
|
|
maintain favorable brand recognition;
|
|
|
|
develop and produce high quality products that appeal to
consumers;
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
appropriately price our products;
|
|
|
|
provide strong and effective marketing support;
|
|
|
|
ensure product availability; and
|
|
|
|
obtain sufficient retail floor space and effectively present our
products at retail.
|
See Item 1A We face intense
competition in the worldwide apparel industry.
Distribution
To facilitate distribution domestically, Ralph Lauren mens
and womens products are shipped from manufacturers
primarily to our distribution center in Greensboro, North
Carolina for inspection, sorting, packing and shipment to retail
customers. Ralph Lauren Childrenswear products are shipped from
our manufacturers to a leased distribution center in
Martinsburg, West Virginia. In addition, we utilize third party
logistics providers to manage selected programs for specific
customers. These facilities are designed to allow for high
density cube storage and utilize bar code technology to provide
inventory management and carton controls. Product traffic
management is also coordinated from these facilities. European
distribution and warehousing has been largely consolidated into
one third party facility located in Parma, Italy.
Our full-price store and factory store distribution and
warehousing are principally handled through the Greensboro
distribution center. Club Monaco products are distributed from
facilities in Ontario, Canada, New Jersey and California.
Value Vision currently performs warehousing, order fulfillment
and call center functions for RL Media, which operates our
Polo.com
e-commerce
website. Contemporaneous with our acquisition of the remaining
50% equity interest in RL Media, we entered into a transition
services agreement with Value Vision to continue to support RL
Media over a period of up to seventeen months from the date of
the acquisition of the RL Media minority interest. RL Media
anticipates performing warehouse, order fulfillment and call
center functions on its own in Fiscal 2008. We expect to occupy
a 360,000 square foot leased distribution facility in High
Point, North Carolina, for our RL Media business during Fiscal
2008. The term of the lease will be 15 years commencing on
the date of the substantial completion of the facility.
Management
Information Systems
Our management information systems make the marketing,
manufacturing, importing and distribution of our products more
efficient by providing, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive order processing;
|
|
|
|
production information;
|
|
|
|
accounting information; and
|
|
|
|
an enterprise view of information for our marketing,
manufacturing, importing and distribution functions.
|
The
point-of-sale
registers in our stores enable us to track inventory from store
receipt to final sale on a real-time basis. We believe our
merchandising and financial systems, coupled with our
point-of-sale
registers and software programs, allow for rapid stock
replenishment, concise merchandise planning and real-time
inventory accounting. See Item 1A
Certain legal proceedings could adversely impact our
results of operations.
We also utilize a sophisticated automated replenishment system
to facilitate the processing of basic replenishment orders from
our wholesale customers, the movement of goods through
distribution channels, and the collection of information for
planning and forecasting. We have a collaborative relationship
with many of our suppliers that enables us to reduce cash to
cash cycles in the management of our inventory. In Fiscal 2006,
we began implementing a new, global enterprise resource
management system for our Wholesale segment. We anticipate
completing the implementation of this system across all of our
wholesale divisions by the end of Fiscal 2010. See
Item 1A Our business could suffer if
our computer systems are disrupted or cease to operate
effectively.
14
Wholesale
Credit Control
We manage our own credit function. We sell our merchandise
primarily to major department stores and extend credit based on
an evaluation of the customers financial condition,
usually without requiring collateral. We monitor credit levels
and the financial condition of our customers on a continuing
basis to minimize credit risk. We do not factor our accounts
receivables or maintain credit insurance to manage the risks of
bad debts. Our bad debt write-offs were $1.2 million in
Fiscal 2007, representing less than 1 percent of net
revenues. See Item 1A Our business
could be negatively impacted by any financial instability of our
customers.
Wholesale
Backlog
We generally receive wholesale orders for apparel products
approximately three to five months prior to the time the
products are delivered to stores. Such orders are generally
subject to broad cancellation rights. As of March 31, 2007,
our summer and fall backlog was $324 million and
$803 million, respectively, compared to $291 million
and $746 million, respectively, as of April 1, 2006.
Our backlog depends upon a number of factors, including the
timing of the market weeks for our particular lines during which
a significant percentage of our orders are received, and the
timing of shipments. As a consequence, a comparison of backlog
from period to period is not necessarily meaningful and may not
be indicative of eventual shipments.
Trademarks
We own the Polo, Ralph Lauren and the
famous polo player astride a horse trademarks in the
U.S. Other trademarks we own include:
|
|
|
|
|
Lauren/Ralph Lauren;
|
|
|
|
RRL;
|
|
|
|
Club Monaco;
|
|
|
|
Rugby;
|
|
|
|
RLX;
|
|
|
|
Chaps;
|
|
|
|
American Living; and
|
|
|
|
Various trademarks pertaining to fragrances and cosmetics.
|
Ralph Lauren has the royalty-free right to use as trademarks
Ralph Lauren, Double RL and
RRL in perpetuity in connection with, among other
things, beef and living animals. The trademarks Double
RL and RRL are currently used by the Double RL
Company, an entity wholly-owned by Mr. Lauren. In addition,
Mr. Lauren has the right to engage in personal projects
involving film or theatrical productions (not including or
relating to our business) through RRL Productions, Inc., a
company wholly owned by Mr. Lauren. Any activity by these
companies has no impact on us.
Our trademarks are the subjects of registrations and pending
applications throughout the world for use on a variety of items
of apparel, apparel-related products, home furnishings and
beauty products, as well as in connection with retail services,
and we continue to expand our worldwide usage and registration
of related trademarks. In general, trademarks remain valid and
enforceable as long as the marks are used in connection with the
related products and services and the required registration
renewals are filed. We regard the license to use the trademarks
and our other proprietary rights in and to the trademarks as
extremely valuable assets in marketing our products and, on a
worldwide basis, vigorously seek to protect them against
infringement (see Item 3 Legal
Proceedings for further discussion). As a result of
the appeal of our trademarks, our products have been the object
of counterfeiting. We have a broad enforcement program which has
been generally effective in controlling the sale of counterfeit
products in the U.S. and in major markets abroad.
15
In markets outside of the U.S., our rights to some or all of our
trademarks may not be clearly established. In the course of our
international expansion, we have experienced conflicts with
various third parties who have acquired ownership rights in
certain trademarks, including Polo
and/or a
representation of a polo player astride a horse, which would
impede our use and registration of our principal trademarks.
While such conflicts are common and may arise again from time to
time as we continue our international expansion, we have
generally successfully resolved such conflicts in the past
through both legal action and negotiated settlements with
third-party owners of the conflicting marks (see
Item 1A Our trademarks and other
intellectual property rights may not be adequately protected
outside the U.S. and Item 3
Legal Proceedings for further discussion).
Although we have not in the past suffered any material
restraints or restrictions on doing business in desirable
markets, we cannot assure that significant impediments will not
arise in the future as we expand product offerings and
additional trademarks to new markets.
We currently have an agreement with a third party which owned
conflicting registrations of the trademarks Polo and
a polo player astride a horse in the United Kingdom, Hong Kong
and South Africa. Under the agreement, the third party retains
the right to use the Polo and polo player symbol
marks in South Africa and all other countries that comprise
Sub-Saharan
Africa, and we agreed to restrict use of those Polo marks in
those countries to fragrances and cosmetics solely as part of
the composite trademark Ralph Lauren and the polo
player symbol, as to which our use is unlimited, and to the use
of the polo player symbol mark on womens and girls
apparel and accessories and womens and girls
handkerchiefs. By agreeing to those restrictions, we secured the
unlimited right to use our trademarks in the United Kingdom and
Hong Kong without payment of any kind, and the third party is
prohibited from distributing products under those trademarks in
those countries.
Import
Restrictions and Other Government Regulations
Virtually all of our merchandise imported into the U.S., Canada,
and Europe is subject to duties. Until January 1, 2005, our
apparel merchandise was also subject to quotas. Quotas represent
the right, pursuant to bilateral or other international trade
arrangements, to export amounts of certain categories of
merchandise into a country or territory pursuant to a visa or
license. Pursuant to the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing,
quotas on textile and apparel products were eliminated for World
Trade Organization (WTO) member countries, including
the U.S., Canada and European countries, on January 1,
2005. Notwithstanding quota elimination, Chinas accession
agreement for membership in the WTO provides that WTO member
countries (including the U.S., Canada and European countries)
may reimpose quotas on specific categories of products in the
event it is determined that imports from China have surged and
are threatening to create a market disruption for such
categories of products (so called safeguard quota
provisions). In response to surging imports, in November
2005 the U.S. and China agreed to a new quota arrangement which
will impose quotas on certain textile products through the end
of calendar 2008. In addition, the European Union also agreed
with China on a new textile arrangement which imposed quotas
through the end of calendar 2007. The U.S. and other countries
may also unilaterally impose additional duties in response to a
particular product being imported (from China or other
countries) at unfairly traded prices that in such increased
quantities as to cause (or threaten) injury to the relevant
domestic industry (generally known as anti-dumping
actions). The European Union has imposed anti-dumping duties on
imports from China and Vietnam in certain footwear categories.
On January 11, 2007, the Bush Administration imposed a
Vietnam Import Monitoring Program on five broad product
groups shirts, trousers, sweaters, underwear, and
swimwear to determine whether any of those imports
might be unfairly traded, due to dumping. The review period will
last for the remainder of the Bush Administration with six-month
reviews of data collected. If dumping is suspected, the
U.S. Government will self-initiate a dumping case on behalf
of the U.S. textile industry which could significantly
affect our costs. Furthermore, additional duties, generally
known as countervailing duties, can also be imposed by the
U.S. Government to offset subsidies provided by a foreign
government to foreign manufactures if the importation of such
subsidized merchandise injures or threatens to injure a
U.S. industry. Recent developments have now made it
possible to impose countervailing duties on products from
non-market economies, such as China, which would significantly
affect our costs.
We are also subject to other international trade agreements and
regulations, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement,
the Central American Free Trade Agreement and the Caribbean
Basin Initiative. In addition, each of the countries in which
our products are sold has laws and regulations covering imports.
Because the U.S. and the
16
other countries in which our products are manufactured and sold
may, from time to time, impose new duties, tariffs, surcharges
or other import controls or restrictions, including the
imposition of safeguard quota, or adjust presently
prevailing duty or tariff rates or levels, we maintain a program
of intensive monitoring of import restrictions and
opportunities. We seek to minimize our potential exposure to
import related risks through, among other measures, adjustments
in product design and fabrication, shifts of production among
countries and manufacturers, as well as through geographical
diversification of our sources of supply.
As almost all our products are manufactured by foreign
suppliers, the enactment of new legislation or the
administration of current international trade regulations,
executive action affecting textile agreements, or changes in
sourcing patterns resulting from the elimination of quota could
adversely affect our operations. Although we generally expect
that the 2005 elimination of quotas will result, over the long
term, in an overall reduction in the cost of apparel produced
abroad, the implementation of any safeguard quota
provisions or any anti-dumping or
countervailing duty actions may result, over the
near term, in cost increases for certain categories of products
and in disruption of the supply chain for certain products
categories. See Item 1A Risk
Factors below for further discussion.
Apparel and other products sold by us are also subject to
regulation in the U.S. and other countries by other governmental
agencies, including, in the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Consumer Products
Safety Commission. These regulations relate principally to
product labeling, licensing requirements and flammability
testing. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with
those regulations, as well as applicable federal, state, local,
and foreign rules and regulations governing the discharge of
materials hazardous to the environment. We do not estimate any
significant capital expenditures for environmental control
matters either in the current year or in the near future. Our
licensed products and licensing partners are also subject to
regulation. Our agreements require our licensing partners to
operate in compliance with all laws and regulations, and we are
not aware of any violations which could reasonably be expected
to have a material adverse effect on our business or results of
operations.
Although we have not suffered any material inhibition from doing
business in desirable markets in the past, we cannot assure that
significant impediments will not arise in the future as we
expand product offerings and introduce additional trademarks to
new markets.
Employees
As of March 31, 2007, we had approximately 14,000
employees, consisting of approximately 11,000 in the U.S. and
approximately 3,000 in foreign countries. 38 of our
U.S. production and distribution employees in the
womenswear business are members of the Union of Needletrades,
Industrial & Textile Employees under an industry
association collective bargaining agreement, which our
womenswear subsidiary has adopted. We consider our relations
with both our union and non-union employees to be good.
17
Executive
Officers
The following are our current executive officers and their
principal business experience for the past five years:
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph Lauren
|
|
Age 67
|
|
Mr. Lauren has been Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company since
prior to the Companys initial public offering in 1997, and
was a member of the Advisory Board of the Board of Directors of
the Companys predecessors since their organization. He
founded Polo in 1967 and has provided leadership in the design,
marketing, advertising and operational areas since such time.
|
Roger N. Farah
|
|
Age 54
|
|
Mr. Farah has been President,
Chief Operating Officer and a director of the Company since
April 2000. He was Chairman of the Board of Venator Group, Inc.
from December 1994 to April 2000, and was Chief Executive
Officer of Venator Group, Inc. from December 1994 to August 1999.
|
Jackwyn Nemerov
|
|
Age 55
|
|
Ms. Nemerov has been Executive
Vice President of the Company since September 2004 and a
director of the Company since February 2007. From 1998 to 2002,
she was President and Chief Operating Officer of Jones Apparel
Group, Inc.
|
Tracey T. Travis
|
|
Age 44
|
|
Ms. Travis has been Senior Vice
President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
since January 2005. Ms. Travis served as Senior Vice
President, Finance of Limited Brands, Inc., an apparel and
personal care products retailer, from April 2002 until August
2004, and Chief Financial Officer of Intimate Brands, Inc., a
womens intimate apparel and personal care products
retailer, from April 2001 to April 2002. Prior to that time,
Ms. Travis was Chief Financial Officer of the Beverage Can
Americas group at American National Can, a manufacturer of
beverage cans, from 1999 to 2001, and held various finance and
operations positions at Pepsi Bottling Group from 1989-1999.
Ms. Travis is a member of the boards of directors of Jo-Ann
Stores, Inc., a specialty retailer of fabrics and crafts, and
the Lincoln Center Theater.
|
Mitchell A. Kosh
|
|
Age 57
|
|
Mr. Kosh has served as Senior Vice
President of Human Resources and Legal of the Company since July
2000. He was Senior Vice President of Human Resources of
Conseco, Inc., from February 2000 to July 2000. Prior to that
time, Mr. Kosh held executive human resource positions with
the Venator Group, Inc. starting in 1996.
|
18
The following risk factors should be read carefully in
connection with evaluating our business and the forward-looking
statements contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our
business, our operating results, our financial condition and the
actual outcome of matters as to which forward-looking statements
are made in this report.
Risks
Related to Our Business
The loss
of the services of Mr. Ralph Lauren or other key personnel
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Mr. Ralph Laurens leadership in the design, marketing
and operational areas of our business has been a critical
element of our success since the inception of our Company. The
death or disability of Mr. Lauren or other extended or
permanent loss of his services, or any negative market or
industry perception with respect to him or arising from his
loss, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our
other executive officers and other members of senior management
have substantial experience and expertise in our business and
have made significant contributions to our growth and success.
The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these
individuals could also adversely affect us. We are not protected
by a material amount of key-man or similar life insurance
covering Mr. Lauren, our other executive officers and
certain other members of senior management. We have entered into
employment agreements with Mr. Lauren and our other
executive officers. We have entered into employment agreements
with Mr. Lauren and our other executive officers, but the
noncompete period with respect to Mr. Lauren and certain
other executive officers could, in some circumstances in the
event of their termination of employment with the Company, end
prior to the employment term set forth in their employment
agreements.
We cannot
assure the successful implementation of our growth
strategy.
As part of our growth strategy, we seek to extend our brands,
expand our geographic coverage and increase direct management of
our brands by opening more of our own stores, strategically
acquiring or integrating select licenses previously held by our
licensees and enhancing our operations. Implementation of our
strategy involves the continued expansion of our business in
Europe, Asia and other international areas. As discussed in
Item 1 Recent Developments,
on May 29, 2007, we acquired a controlling interest in
Impact 21, as part of the Tender Offer, and the remaining
50% interest in PRL Japan. We also acquired in April 2007 our
previously licensed belts and leather goods business and the
remaining 50% interest in RL Media on March 28, 2007. In
Fiscal 2006 we acquired our previously licensed mens and
womens casual apparel and sportswear in the U.S. and
Canada from Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries
(Polo Jeans Business). In addition, in Fiscal 2006,
we acquired our previously licensed mens, womens and
childrens footwear from Reebok International Ltd.
(Footwear Business).
We may have difficulty integrating acquired businesses into our
operations, hiring and retaining qualified key employees, or
otherwise successfully managing such expansion. Furthermore, we
may not be able to successfully integrate the business of any
licensee that we acquire into our own business or achieve any
expected cost savings or synergies from such integration.
Implementation of our strategy involves the continuation, and
expansion of our distribution network, both in the U.S. and
abroad. We may not be able to procure, purchase or lease
desirable free-standing, or department store locations, or renew
and maintain existing free-standing store leases and department
store locations on acceptable terms.
In Europe we lack the large wholesale distribution channels we
have in the U.S., and we may have difficulty developing
successful distribution strategies and alliances in each of the
major European countries. In Japan, our primary mode of
distribution is via a network of shops located within the
leading department stores. We may have difficulty in
successfully retaining this network, and expanding into
alternate distribution channels. Additionally, macroeconomic
trends may not be favorable, and could limit our ability to
implement our growth strategies in select geographies where we
have foreign operations, such as Europe and Asia.
19
Our
business could suffer as a result of consolidations,
restructurings and other ownership changes in the retail
industry.
Several of our department store customers, including some under
common ownership, account for significant portions of our
wholesale net sales. We believe that a substantial portion of
sales of our licensed products by our domestic licensing
partners, including sales made by our sales force of Ralph
Lauren Home products, are also made to our largest department
store customers. In Fiscal 2007, sales to Federated Department
Stores, Inc. represented 29% of our wholesale net sales and
sales to Dillard Department Stores, Inc. represented 14% of our
wholesale net sales. In the aggregate, our ten largest customers
accounted for approximately 67% of our wholesale net sales
during Fiscal 2007. There can be no assurance that
consolidations in the department store sector will not have a
material adverse effect on our wholesale business.
We do not enter into long-term agreements with any of our
customers. Instead, we enter into a number of purchase order
commitments with our customers for each of our lines every
season. A decision by the controlling owner of a group of stores
or any other significant customer, whether motivated by
competitive conditions, financial difficulties or otherwise, to
decrease or eliminate the amount of merchandise purchased from
us or our licensing partners or to change their manner of doing
business with us or our licensing partners could have a material
adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
Our
business could be negatively impacted by any financial
instability of our customers.
We sell our wholesale merchandise primarily to major department
stores across the U.S. and Europe and extend credit based on an
evaluation of each customers financial condition, usually
without requiring collateral. However, the financial
difficulties of a customer could cause us to curtail or
eliminate business with that customer. We may also assume more
credit risk relating to that customers receivables. Two of
our customers, Dillard Department Stores, Inc. and Federated
Department Stores, Inc. in the aggregate constituted 37% of
trade accounts receivable outstanding as of March 31, 2007.
Our inability to collect on our trade accounts receivable from
any one of these customers could have a material adverse effect
on our business or financial condition. See
Item 1 Credit Control.
Certain
legal proceedings and regulatory matters could adversely impact
our results of operations.
We are involved in certain legal proceedings and are subject to
various claims involving alleged breach of contract claims,
credit card fraud, security breaches in certain of our retail
store information systems, employment issues, consumer matters
and other litigations. Certain of these lawsuits and claims, if
decided adversely to us or settled by us, could result in
material liability to the Company or have a negative impact on
the Companys reputation or relations with its employees,
customers, licensees or other third parties. Further, changes in
governmental regulations both in the U.S. and in other countries
where we conduct business operations could have an adverse
impact on our results of operations. See Item 3
Legal Proceedings for further discussion of
the Companys legal matters.
Our
business could suffer if our computer systems are disrupted or
cease to operate effectively.
The Company relies heavily on its computer systems to record and
process transactions and manage and operate our business. We
also utilize a sophisticated automated replenishment system to
facilitate the processing of basic replenishment orders from our
wholesale customers, the movement of goods through distribution
channels, and the collection of information for planning and
forecasting. Given the complexity of our business and the
significant number of transactions that we engage in on an
annual basis, it is imperative that we maintain constant
operation of our computer hardware and software systems. Despite
our efforts to prevent, our systems are vulnerable from time to
time to damage or interruption from, among other things,
security breaches, computer viruses or power outages. In
addition, we are currently undergoing a system conversion that
is intended to establish a common platform across our various
wholesale businesses, which is expected to be completed by the
end of Fiscal 2010 across all of our wholesale divisions.
The risk of disruption is increased when complex systems changes
of this type are undertaken. If our systems are damaged or fail
to function effectively, the Company will likely have to make a
significant monetary investment to fix or replace them and the
Company could endure interruptions or
20
delays in its operations. Any material interruption in our
computer operations could have a material adverse effect on our
business or results of operations.
Our
business is subject to risks associated with importing
products.
As of March 31, 2007, we source a significant portion of
our products outside the U.S. through arrangements with
over 350 foreign vendors in various countries. In Fiscal 2007,
over 99%, by dollar value, of our products were produced outside
the U.S., primarily in Asia, Europe and South America. Risks
inherent in importing our products include:
|
|
|
|
|
quotas imposed by bilateral textile agreements with China and
non-WTO countries. These agreements limit the amount and type of
goods that may be imported annually from these countries;
|
|
|
|
changes in social, political and economic conditions or
terrorist acts that could result in the disruption of trade from
the countries in which our manufacturers or suppliers are
located;
|
|
|
|
the imposition of additional regulations relating to imports or
exports;
|
|
|
|
the imposition of additional duties, taxes and other charges on
imports or exports;
|
|
|
|
significant fluctuations of the cost of raw materials;
|
|
|
|
significant delays in the delivery of cargo due to security
considerations;
|
|
|
|
the imposition of antidumping or countervailing duty proceedings
resulting in the potential assessment of special antidumping or
countervailing duties; and
|
|
|
|
the imposition of sanctions in the form of additional duties
either by the U.S. or its trading partners to remedy
perceived illegal actions by national governments.
|
Any one of these factors could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
Our
ability to conduct business in international markets may be
affected by legal, regulatory, political and economic
risks.
Our ability to capitalize on growth in new international markets
and to maintain the current level of operations in our existing
international markets is subject to risks associated with
international operations. These include:
|
|
|
|
|
the burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws and
regulations;
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; and
|
|
|
|
new tariffs or other barriers in some international markets.
|
We are also subject to general political and economic risks in
connection with our international operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
political instability and terrorist attacks;
|
|
|
|
changes in diplomatic and trade relationships; and
|
|
|
|
general economic fluctuations in specific countries or markets.
|
We cannot predict whether quotas, duties, taxes, or other
similar restrictions will be imposed by the U.S., the European
Union, Japan, or other countries upon the import or export of
our products in the future, or what effect any of these actions
would have on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. Changes in regulatory, geopolitical, social or
economic policies and other factors may have a material adverse
effect on our business in the future or may require us to
significantly modify our current business practices.
21
Our
trademarks and other intellectual property rights may not be
adequately protected outside the U.S.
We believe that our trademarks and other proprietary rights are
extremely important to our success and our competitive position.
We devote substantial resources to the establishment and
protection of our trademarks and anti-counterfeiting activities
worldwide. Significant counterfeiting of our products continues,
however, and in the course of our international expansion we
have experienced conflicts with various third parties that have
acquired or claimed ownership rights in some trademarks that
include Polo
and/or a
representation of a polo player astride a horse, or otherwise
have contested our rights to our trademarks. We have in the past
resolved certain of these conflicts through both legal action
and negotiated settlements, none of which, we believe, has had a
material impact on our financial condition and results of
operations. We cannot guarantee that the actions we have taken
to establish and protect our trademarks and other proprietary
rights will be adequate to prevent counterfeiting or a material
adverse effect on our business or brands arising from imitation
of our products by others or to prevent others from seeking to
block sales of our products as a violation of the trademarks and
proprietary rights of others. Also, there can be no assurance
that others will not assert rights in, or ownership of,
trademarks and other proprietary rights of ours or that we will
be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to our
satisfaction or at all. In addition, the laws of certain foreign
countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent
as do the laws of the U.S. See Item 1
Trademarks, and Item 3
Legal Proceedings.
Our
business could suffer as a result of a manufacturers
inability to produce our goods on time and to our
specifications.
We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities and depend
exclusively on independent third parties for the manufacture of
all of our products. Our products are manufactured to our
specifications primarily by international manufacturers. During
Fiscal 2007, less than 1%, by dollar value, of our mens
and womens products were manufactured in the U.S. and over
99%, by dollar value, of these products were manufactured in
other countries. Two of the manufacturers engaged by us
accounted for approximately 12% and 8% of our total production
during Fiscal 2007. The primary production facilities of these
two manufacturers are located in Asia. The inability of a
manufacturer to ship orders of our products in a timely manner
or to meet our quality standards could cause us to miss the
delivery date requirements of our customers for those items,
which could result in cancellation of orders, refusal to accept
deliveries or a substantial reduction in purchase prices, any of
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Our
business could suffer if one of our manufacturers fails to use
acceptable labor practices.
We require our licensing partners and independent manufacturers
to operate in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
While our internal and vendor operating guidelines promote
ethical business practices and our staff periodically visits and
monitors the operations of our independent manufacturers, we do
not control these manufacturers or their labor practices. The
violation of labor or other laws by an independent manufacturer
used by us or one of our licensing partners, or the divergence
of an independent manufacturers or licensing
partners labor practices from those generally accepted as
ethical in the U.S., could interrupt, or otherwise disrupt the
shipment of finished products to us or damage our reputation.
Any of these, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
Our
business could suffer if we need to replace
manufacturers.
We compete with other companies for the production capacity of
our manufacturers and import quota capacity. Some of these
competitors have greater financial and other resources than we
have, and thus may have an advantage in the competition for
production and import quota capacity. If we experience a
significant increase in demand, or if an existing manufacturer
of ours must be replaced, we may have to expand our third-party
manufacturing capacity. We cannot guarantee that this additional
capacity will be available when required on terms that are
acceptable to us. See Item 1 Sourcing,
Production and Quality. We enter into a number of
purchase order commitments each season specifying a time for
delivery, method of payment, design and quality specifications
and other standard industry provisions, but do not have
long-term contracts with any manufacturer. None of the
manufacturers we use produce our products exclusively.
22
Our
business is exposed to domestic and foreign currency
fluctuations.
We generally purchase our products in U.S. dollars.
However, we source most of our products overseas. As a result,
the cost of these products may be affected by changes in the
value of the relevant currencies. Changes in currency exchange
rates may also affect the U.S. dollar value of the foreign
currency denominated prices at which our international
businesses sell products. Furthermore, our international sales
and licensing revenue generally is derived from sales in foreign
currencies. These foreign currencies include the Japanese Yen,
the Euro and the Pound Sterling, and this revenue could be
materially affected by currency fluctuations. Although we hedge
some exposures to changes in foreign currency exchange rates
arising in the ordinary course of business, we cannot assure you
that foreign currency fluctuations will not have a material
adverse impact on our financial condition and results of
operations. See Item 7 Market Risk
Management.
We rely
on our licensing partners to preserve the value of our
licenses.
The risks associated with our own products also apply to our
licensed products in addition to any number of possible risks
specific to a licensing partners business, including, for
example, risks associated with a particular licensing
partners ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
obtain capital;
|
|
|
|
manage its labor relations;
|
|
|
|
maintain relationships with its suppliers;
|
|
|
|
manage its credit risk effectively; and
|
|
|
|
maintain relationships with its customers.
|
Although some of our license agreements prohibit licensing
partners from entering into licensing arrangements with our
competitors, our licensing partners generally are not precluded
from offering, under other brands, the types of products covered
by their license agreements with us. A substantial portion of
sales of our products by our domestic licensing partners are
also made to our largest customers. While we have significant
control over our licensing partners products and
advertising, we rely on our licensing partners for, among other
things, operational and financial control over their businesses.
Changes in management, reduced sales of licensed products, poor
execution or financial difficulties with respect to any of our
licensing partners could adversely affect our revenues, both
directly from reduced licensing revenue received and indirectly
from reduced sales of our other products. See
Item 1 Our Licensing Segment.
Failure
to maintain licensing partners could harm our
business.
Although we believe in most circumstances we could replace
existing licensing partners if necessary, our inability to do so
for any period of time could adversely affect our revenues, both
directly from reduced licensing revenue received and indirectly
from reduced sales of our other products. See
Item 1 Our Licensing Segment.
Risks
Relating to the Industry in Which We Compete
We face
intense competition in the worldwide apparel industry.
We face a variety of intense competitive challenges from other
domestic and foreign fashion-oriented apparel and casual apparel
producers, some of which may be significantly larger and more
diversified and have greater financial and marketing resources
than we have. We compete with these companies primarily on the
basis of:
|
|
|
|
|
anticipating and responding to changing consumer demands in a
timely manner;
|
|
|
|
maintaining favorable brand recognition;
|
|
|
|
developing innovative, high-quality products in sizes, colors
and styles that appeal to consumers;
|
|
|
|
appropriately pricing products;
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
providing strong and effective marketing support;
|
|
|
|
creating an acceptable value proposition for retail customers;
|
|
|
|
ensuring product availability and optimizing supply chain
efficiencies with manufacturers and retailers; and
|
|
|
|
obtaining sufficient retail floor space and effective
presentation of our products at retail stores.
|
We also face increasing competition from companies selling
apparel and home products through the Internet. Although RL
Media sells our products domestically through the Internet,
increased competition in the worldwide apparel, accessories and
home product industries from Internet-based competitors could
reduce our sales, prices and margins and adversely affect our
results of operations.
The
success of our business depends on our ability to respond to
constantly changing fashion trends and consumer
demands.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to originate
and define fashion product and home product trends, as well as
to anticipate, gauge and react to changing consumer demands in a
timely manner. Our products must appeal to a broad range of
consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty
and are subject to rapid change. We cannot assure you that we
will be able to continue to develop appealing styles or
successfully meet constantly changing consumer demands in the
future. In addition, we cannot assure you that any new products
or brands that we introduce will be successfully received by
consumers. Any failure on our part to anticipate, identify and
respond effectively to changing consumer demands and fashion
trends could adversely affect retail and consumer acceptance of
our products and leave us with a substantial amount of unsold
inventory or missed opportunities. If that occurs, we may be
forced to rely on markdowns or promotional sales to dispose of
excess, slow-moving inventory, which may harm our business. At
the same time, our focus on tight management of inventory may
result, from time to time, in our not having an adequate supply
of products to meet consumer demand and cause us to lose sales.
See Item 1 Sourcing, Production and
Quality.
A
downturn in the economy may affect consumer purchases of
discretionary items and luxury retail products, which could
adversely affect our sales.
The industries in which we operate are cyclical. Many economic
factors outside of our control affect the level of consumer
spending in the apparel, cosmetic, fragrance and home products
industries, including, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
general business conditions;
|
|
|
|
economic downturns;
|
|
|
|
employment levels;
|
|
|
|
downturns in the stock market;
|
|
|
|
interest rates;
|
|
|
|
the housing market;
|
|
|
|
consumer debt levels;
|
|
|
|
the availability of consumer credit;
|
|
|
|
increases in fuel prices;
|
|
|
|
taxation; and
|
|
|
|
consumer confidence in future economic conditions.
|
Consumer purchases of discretionary items and luxury retail
products, including our products, may decline during
recessionary periods and at other times when disposable income
is lower. A downturn or an uncertain outlook in the economies in
which we, or our licensing partners, sell our products may
materially adversely affect our businesses and our revenues and
profits.
24
The domestic and international political situation also affects
consumer confidence. The threat, outbreak or escalation of
terrorism, military conflicts or other hostilities could lead to
a decrease in consumer spending.
We lease space for our retail and factory showrooms, and
warehouse and office space in various domestic and international
locations. We do not own any real property except for our
distribution facility in Greensboro, North Carolina and a
parcel of land adjacent to the facility, and retail stores in
Southampton, New York and Nantucket, Massachusetts.
Contemporaneous with our acquisition of the remaining 50% equity
interest in RL Media, we entered into a transition services
agreement with Value Vision to continue to provide all
warehousing, order fulfillment and call center functions for RL
Media through August 2008. RL Media anticipates performing
warehousing, order fulfillment and call center functions on its
own in Fiscal 2008.
We believe that our existing facilities are well maintained, in
good operating condition and are adequate for our present level
of operations. The following table sets forth information with
respect to our key properties:
The following table sets forth information with respect to our
key properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Current Lease Term
|
Location
|
|
Use
|
|
Sq. Ft.
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Greensboro, N.C.
|
|
Distribution Facility
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
Martinsburg, W.V
|
|
Distribution Facility
|
|
|
187,000
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
650 Madison Avenue, NYC
|
|
Executive, corporate office and
design
studio, Mens showrooms
|
|
|
207,000
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
Lyndhurst, N.J.
|
|
Corporate and retail
administrative offices
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
550 7th Avenue, NYC
|
|
Corporate office, design studio
and
Womens showrooms
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
625 Madison Avenue, NYC
|
|
Corporate offices and home showroom
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Geneva, Switzerland
|
|
European corporate offices
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
867 Madison Avenue, NYC
|
|
Flagship Store
|
|
|
27,700
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
Beverly Hills, CA
|
|
Flagship Store
|
|
|
21,600
|
|
|
September 30, 2023
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
Flagship Store
|
|
|
37,600
|
|
|
November 14, 2017
|
Milan, Italy
|
|
Flagship Store
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
June 30, 2015
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Flagship Store
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
We expect to occupy a 360,000 square foot leased
distribution facility in High Point, North Carolina, for our RL
Media business during Fiscal 2008. The term of the lease will be
15 years commencing on the date of the substantial
completion of the facility.
We paid aggregate rent in Fiscal 2007 of approximately
$54 million for our non-retail facilities. We anticipate
that we will be able to extend those leases which expire in the
near future on terms satisfactory to us or relocate to
facilities timely and on acceptable terms.
As of March 31, 2007, we operated 292 retail stores,
totaling approximately 2.3 million square feet. Aggregate
annual rentals for retail space in Fiscal 2007 totaled
approximately $118 million. We anticipate that we will be
able to extend those leases which expire in the near future on
satisfactory terms or relocate to desirable locations.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The Company is indirectly subject to various claims relating to
allegations of security breaches in certain of its retail store
information systems. These claims have been made by various
credit card associations, issuing banks and credit card
processors with respect to cards issued by them pursuant to the
rules imposed by certain credit card
25
issuers, particularly
Visa®
and
MasterCard®.
The allegations include fraudulent credit card charges, the cost
of replacing credit cards, related monitoring expenses and other
related claims.
In Fiscal 2005, the Company was subject to various claims
relating to an alleged security breach of its
point-of-sale
systems that occurred at certain Polo retail stores in the
U.S. The Company has previously recorded a reserve in an
aggregate amount of $13 million to provide for its best
estimate of losses related to these claims. $6.2 million
was recorded during Fiscal 2005 and the remaining
$6.8 million of this reserve was recorded during Fiscal
2006. The Company has paid $11.4 million through
March 31, 2007 in settlement of these various claims. The
eligibility period for filing any new claims with respect to
this matter expired at the end of January 2007.
In addition, in the third quarter of Fiscal 2007, the Company
was notified of an alleged compromise of its retail store
information systems that process its credit card data for
certain Club Monaco stores in Canada. While the investigation of
the alleged Club Monaco compromise is ongoing, the evidence to
date indicates that only numerical credit card data may have
been accessed and not customer names or contact information. The
Companys Canadian credit card processor has thus far
required the Company to create a reserve of $2 million to
cover potential claims relating to this alleged compromise and
has deducted funds from Club Monaco credit card transactions to
establish this reserve. Since the Company has been advised by
its credit card processor that potential claims related to this
matter are likely to exceed $2 million in the aggregate,
the Company has also recorded an additional $3 million
charge during Fiscal 2007 to increase the total reserve for this
matter to $5 million based on its best estimate of
exposure. Although claims brought against the Company could
exceed the amount of the $5 million reserve, in any event
the ultimate resolution of these claims is not expected to have
a material adverse effect on the Companys liquidity or
financial position.
The Company is cooperating with law enforcement authorities in
both the U.S. and Canada in their investigations of these
matters.
On August 19, 2005, Wathne Imports, Ltd., our domestic
licensee for luggage and handbags (Wathne), filed a
complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York against us and Ralph Lauren, our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, asserting, among other things,
federal trademark law violations, breach of contract, breach of
obligations of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and negligent
misrepresentation. The complaint sought, among other relief,
injunctive relief, compensatory damages in excess of
$250 million and punitive damages of not less than
$750 million. On September 13, 2005, Wathne withdrew
this complaint from the U.S. District Court and filed a
complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New
York County, making substantially the same allegations and
claims (excluding the federal trademark claims), and seeking
similar relief. On February 1, 2006, the Court granted our
motion to dismiss all of the causes of action, including the
cause of action against Mr. Lauren, except for the breach
of contract claims, and denied Wathnes motion for a
preliminary injunction. A trial date is not yet set for this
lawsuit on the breach of contract claims but the Company does
not currently anticipate that a trial will occur prior to
calendar 2008. We believe this lawsuit to be without merit, we
have recently moved for summary judgment and we intend to
continue to contest this lawsuit vigorously. Accordingly,
management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this
matter will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
liquidity or financial position.
On October 1, 1999, we filed a lawsuit against the
U.S. Polo Association Inc. (USPA), Jordache,
Ltd. (Jordache) and certain other entities
affiliated with them, alleging that the defendants were
infringing on our trademarks. In connection with this lawsuit,
on July 19, 2001, the USPA and Jordache filed a lawsuit
against us in the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York. This suit, which was effectively a
counterclaim by them in connection with the original trademark
action, asserted claims related to our actions in our pursuit of
claims against the U.S. Polo Association and Jordache for
trademark infringement and other unlawful conduct. Their claims
stemmed from our contacts with the USPAs and
Jordaches retailers in which we informed these retailers
of our position in the original trademark action. All claims and
counterclaims, except for our claims that the defendants
violated our trademark rights, were settled in September 2003.
We did not pay any damages in this settlement.
On July 30, 2004, the Court denied all motions for summary
judgment, and trial began on October 3, 2005 with respect
to four double horseman symbols that the defendants
sought to use. On October 20, 2005, the jury rendered a
verdict, finding that one of the defendants marks violated
our world famous Polo Player Symbol trademark and enjoining its
further use, but allowing the defendants to use the remaining
three marks. On
26
November 16, 2005, we filed a motion before the trial court
to overturn the jurys decision and hold a new trial with
respect to the three marks that the jury found not to be
infringing. The USPA and Jordache opposed our motion, but did
not move to overturn the jurys decision that the fourth
double horseman logo did infringe on our trademarks. On
July 7, 2006, the judge denied our motion to overturn the
jurys decision. On August 4, 2006, we filed an appeal
of the judges decision to deny our motion for a new trial
to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. We are
awaiting a decision from the Court with respect to this appeal.
On September 18, 2002, an employee at one of our stores
filed a lawsuit against us in the U.S. District Court for
the District of Northern California alleging violations of
California antitrust and labor laws. The plaintiff purported to
represent a class of employees who had allegedly been injured by
a requirement that certain retail employees purchase and wear
our apparel as a condition of their employment. The complaint,
as amended, seeks an unspecified amount of actual and punitive
damages, disgorgement of profits and injunctive and declaratory
relief. We answered the amended complaint on November 4,
2002. A hearing on cross motions for summary judgment on the
issue of whether our policies violated California law occurred
on August 14, 2003. The Court granted partial summary
judgment with respect to certain of the plaintiffs claims,
but concluded that more discovery was necessary before it could
decide the key issue as to whether we had maintained for a
period of time a dress code policy that violated California law.
On January 12, 2006, a proposed settlement of the purported
class action was submitted to the court for approval. A hearing
on the settlement was held before the Court on June 29,
2006. On October 26, 2006, the Court granted preliminary
approval of the settlement and agreed to begin the process of
sending out claim forms to members of the class. On
March 28, 2007, the Court granted final approval of the
settlement and awarded approximately $1.1 million to
members of the class and their attorneys. We had previously
established a reserve of $1.5 million for this matter in
Fiscal 2005. The Courts approval of the settlement also
resulted in the dismissal of the similar purported class action
filed in San Francisco Superior Court, as described below.
On April 14, 2003, a second putative class action was filed
in the San Francisco Superior Court. This suit, brought by
the same attorneys, alleged near identical claims to those in
the federal class action. The class representatives consisted of
former employees and the plaintiff in the federal class action.
Defendants in this class action included us and our Polo Retail,
LLC, Fashions Outlet of America, Inc., Polo Retail, Inc. and
San Francisco Polo, Ltd. subsidiaries as well as a
non-affiliated corporate defendant and two current managers. As
in the federal class action, the complaint sought an unspecified
amount of actual and punitive restitution of monies spent, and
declaratory relief. As noted above, on March 28, 2007, the
Court granted final approval of the settlement in the federal
class action, which resulted in the dismissal of this lawsuit.
We are otherwise involved from time to time in legal claims and
proceedings involving credit card fraud, trademark and
intellectual property, licensing, employee relations and other
matters incidental to our business. We believe that the
resolution of these other matters currently pending will not
individually or in aggregate have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.
27
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholders
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Our Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol RL. The
following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per
share of the Class A common stock for each quarterly period
in our two most recent fiscal years, as reported on the NYSE
Composite Tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price
|
|
|
|
of Class A
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
62.87
|
|
|
$
|
52.02
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
66.20
|
|
|
|
45.65
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
83.15
|
|
|
|
64.77
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
90.12
|
|
|
|
77.90
|
|
Fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
44.70
|
|
|
$
|
34.19
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
53.25
|
|
|
|
43.29
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
56.84
|
|
|
|
47.83
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
61.74
|
|
|
|
52.91
|
|
On May 20, 2003, our Board of Directors initiated a regular
quarterly cash dividend program of $0.05 per share, or
$0.20 per share on an annual basis, on our Class A
common stock. Approximately $21 million was recorded as a
reduction to retained earnings during Fiscal 2007 in connection
with these dividends.
As of May 18, 2007, there were 1,508 holders of record of
our Class A common stock and 11 holders of record of our
Class B common stock. All of our outstanding shares of
Class B common stock are owned by Mr. Ralph Lauren and
related entities and are convertible at any time into shares of
Class A common stock on a
one-for-one
basis.
The following table sets forth the repurchases of our common
stock during the Fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Dollar Value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
of Shares That
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
May Yet be
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Paid Per Share
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 to
January 27, 2007
|
|
|
403,300
|
|
|
$
|
80.61
|
|
|
|
403,300
|
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
January 28, 2007 to
February 24, 2007
|
|
|
93,273
|
|
|
|
80.41
|
|
|
|
93,273
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
February 25, 2007 to
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These purchases were made on the
open market under the Companys Class A common stock
repurchase program. In November 2006, the Companys Board
of Directors approved an expansion of the Companys
existing common stock repurchase program that allows the Company
to repurchase, at its discretion from time to time, up to
$500 million of Class A common stock. Repurchases of
shares of Class A common stock are subject to overall
business and market conditions. This program does not have a
fixed termination date.
|
28
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder
return (stock price appreciation plus dividends) on our
Class A common stock with the cumulative total return of
the Standard & Poors 500 Index, our peer group
for the preceding fiscal year the
Standard & Poors Composite 1500 Apparel,
Accessories & Luxury Goods Index (Old Peer
Group) and a peer group index of companies that we believe
are similar to ours (New Peer Group) for the period
from March 28, 2002, the last trading day in the
Companys 2002 fiscal year, through March 31, 2007,
the last trading day in the Companys 2007 fiscal year. Our
New Peer Group consists of Coach, Estee Lauder, Jones Apparel,
Kellwood, Kenneth Cole, Liz Claiborne, Phillips Van Heusen,
Tiffany & Co., VF Corp., Warnaco, LVMH, Burberry,
Christian Dior, PPR SA, Hermes International, Richemont,
Luxottica and Tods Group. We believe that the companies in
our New Peer Group index, taken together, are more comparable to
our businesses. The returns are calculated by assuming an
investment in the Class A common stock and each index of
$100 on March 29, 2002, with all dividends reinvested.
COMPARISON
OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, The S & P 500
Index,
The S & P Composite 1500 Apparel, Accessories &
Luxury Goods Index
And A Peer Group
|
|
* |
$100 invested on 3/29/02 in stock or on 3/31/02 in
index-including reinvestment of dividends. Index calculated on
month-end basis.
|
Copyright©
2007, Standard & Poors, a division of The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
www.researchdatagroup.com/S&P.htm
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
See the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and
Supplementary Information and specifically Selected
Financial Information appearing at the end of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
29
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations should be read together with our audited
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes,
which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for Fiscal 2007 (Fiscal 2007
10-K).
We utilize a
52-53 week
fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to March 31. As
such, Fiscal year 2007 ended on March 31, 2007 and
reflected a
52-week
period (Fiscal 2007); Fiscal year 2006 ended on
April 1, 2006 and reflected a
52-week
period (Fiscal 2006); and Fiscal year 2005 ended on
April 2, 2005 and reflected a
52-week
period (Fiscal 2005).
INTRODUCTION
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations (MD&A) is provided as
a supplement to the accompanying audited consolidated financial
statements and footnotes to help provide an understanding of our
financial condition, changes in financial condition and results
of our operations. MD&A is organized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Overview. This section provides a general
description of our business, including our objectives and risks,
and a summary of financial performance for Fiscal 2007. In
addition, this section includes a discussion of recent
developments and transactions affecting comparability that we
believe are important in understanding our results of operations
and financial condition, and in anticipating future trends.
|
|
|
|
Results of operations. This section provides
an analysis of our results of operations for Fiscal 2007, Fiscal
2006 and Fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
Financial condition and liquidity. This
section provides an analysis of our cash flows for Fiscal 2007,
Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal 2005, as well as a discussion of our
financial condition and liquidity as of March 31, 2007. The
discussion of our financial condition and liquidity includes
(i) our available financial capacity under our credit
facility, (ii) a summary of our key debt compliance
measures and (iii) a summary of our outstanding debt and
commitments as of March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Market risk management. This section discusses
how we manage exposure to potential losses arising from adverse
changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and
fluctuations in the reported net assets of certain of our
international operations.
|
|
|
|
Critical accounting policies. This section
discusses accounting policies considered to be important to our
financial condition and results of operations and which require
significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in
their application. In addition, all of our significant
accounting policies, including our critical accounting policies,
are summarized in Notes 3 and 4 to our accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
Recently issued accounting standards. This
section discusses the potential impact to our reported financial
condition and results of operations of accounting standards that
have been issued, but which we have not yet adopted.
|
OVERVIEW
Our
Business
Our Company is a global leader in the design, marketing and
distribution of premium lifestyle products including mens,
womens and childrens apparel, accessories,
fragrances and home furnishings. Our long-standing reputation
and distinctive image have been consistently developed across an
expanding number of products, brands and international markets.
Our brand names include Polo, Polo by Ralph Lauren,
Ralph Lauren Purple Label, Ralph Lauren Black Label, RLX, Ralph
Lauren Blue Label, Lauren, RRL, Rugby, Chaps, Club Monaco
and American Living, among others.
We classify our businesses into three segments: Wholesale,
Retail and Licensing. Our wholesale business (representing 54%
of Fiscal 2007 net revenues) consists of wholesale-channel
sales made principally to major department stores, specialty
stores and golf and pro shops located throughout the U.S. and
Europe. Our retail business (representing 41% of Fiscal
2007 net revenues) consists of retail-channel sales
directly to consumers through full-price and factory retail
stores located throughout the U.S., Canada, Europe, South
America and Asia, and through our retail internet site located
at www.Polo.com. In addition, our licensing business
(representing 5% of
30
Fiscal 2007 net revenues) consists of royalty-based
arrangements under which we license the right to third parties
to use our various trademarks in connection with the manufacture
and sale of designated products, such as apparel, eyewear and
fragrances, in specified geographical areas for specified
periods. Approximately 20% of our Fiscal 2007 net revenues was
earned in the international regions outside of the U.S. and
Canada. See Note 20 to the accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements for a summary of net revenues
by geographic location.
Our business is affected by seasonal trends, with higher levels
of wholesale sales in our second and fourth quarters and higher
retail sales in our second and third quarters. These trends
result primarily from the timing of seasonal wholesale shipments
and key vacation travel,
back-to-school
and holiday periods in the Retail segment.
Our
Objectives and Risks
We believe our core strengths, including a global luxury
lifestyle brand, a strong and experienced management team, a
proven ability to develop and extend our brands distributed
through multiple retail channels in global markets, a
disciplined investment philosophy and a solid balance sheet,
have collectively enabled us to significantly increase
stockholder value in recent years. Further, we believe those
core strengths will continue to allow us to execute our strategy
for long-term sustainable growth in revenue, net income and
operating cash flow.
Our operating success has been driven by the Companys
focus on six key objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
Creating unique businesses primarily centered around one core
and heritage-driven brand;
|
|
|
|
Diversifying and expanding our products and prices, distribution
channels and geographic regions;
|
|
|
|
Improving brand control and positioning;
|
|
|
|
Focusing on selective strategic partnerships;
|
|
|
|
Implementing infrastructure improvements that support a
worldwide business; and
|
|
|
|
Funding our expansion through strong operating cash flow.
|
In connection with these objectives, we intend to continue to
pursue opportunities for growth globally to expand our retail
presence in various formats designed to meet consumer needs, to
further develop a wide array of luxury accessories product
offerings, and to create new lifestyle brands in partnership
with select department and specialty stores.
Significant challenges and risks accompany our opportunities for
long-term growth and our ability to increase stockholder value.
See Item 1A Risk Factors
included elsewhere in this Fiscal 2007
10-K for
further discussion.
Summary
of Financial Performance
Operating
Results
During Fiscal 2007, we reported revenues of $4.295 billion,
net income of $400.9 million and net income per diluted
share of $3.73. This compares to revenues of
$3.746 billion, net income of $308.0 million and net
income per diluted share of $2.87 during Fiscal 2006. Our strong
Fiscal 2007 operating performance was primarily driven by 14.7%
revenue growth led by our Wholesale and Retail segments
(including the effect of certain acquisitions that occurred in
Fiscal 2006) and gross profit percentage expansion of
40 basis points to 54.4%. Excluding the effect of
acquisitions, revenues increased by 10.0%. Operating income as a
percentage of revenue increased 140 basis points to 15.2%
during Fiscal 2007, reflecting our revenue growth, gross profit
percentage expansion and improved leveraging of selling, general
and administrative (SG&A) expenses. SG&A
expenses included stock-based compensation costs reflecting the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123R, Share-Based Payment
(FAS 123R). Such costs were $43.6 million
on a pre-tax basis ($26.1 million after-tax) in Fiscal
2007, compared to $26.6 million on a pre-tax basis
($16.2 million after-tax) in Fiscal 2006. In turn, net
income per diluted share was reduced by stock-based compensation
costs in the amount of $0.24 per share during Fiscal 2007,
compared to $0.15 per share during Fiscal 2006. Offsetting
the higher stock-based compensation costs and contributing to
the growth in net income and net income per diluted share was a
net reduction in Fiscal 2007 of $19.0 million of pre-tax
charges related to restructurings, asset impairments and credit
card contingencies as compared to Fiscal 2006. See
Transactions Affecting Comparability of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition described below for
further discussion of these transactions.
31
See Note 18 to the accompanying audited consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of the impact of
adopting FAS 123R.
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
Our financial position continues to reflect the strength of our
business results. We ended Fiscal 2007 with a net cash position
(total cash and cash equivalents less total debt) of
$165.1 million, compared to $5.3 million at the end of
Fiscal 2006. In addition, our stockholders equity
increased to $2.335 billion as of March 31, 2007,
compared to $2.050 billion as of April 1, 2006. During
Fiscal 2007, we successfully completed the issuance of
300 million principal amount of 4.50% notes due
October 4, 2013 (the 2006 Euro Debt). We used
the net proceeds from this issuance to repay approximately
227 million principal amount of Euro debt obligations
that matured on November 22, 2006 (the 1999 Euro
Debt) and for general corporate and working capital
purposes. Also, during Fiscal 2007, we took advantage of our
recent credit rating upgrades and amended our credit facility to
increase our borrowing capacity, lower our financing costs and
eliminate certain financial covenants (see Note 13 to the
accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for
further discussion).
We generated $796.1 million of cash from operations during
Fiscal 2007, compared to $449.1 million in the prior fiscal
year. Included in our cash from operations was approximately
$180 million (net of certain refundable tax withholdings)
of prepaid royalty and design-service fees from Luxottica Group,
S.p.A. and affiliates (Luxottica) in connection with
the start of our ten-year eyewear licensing agreement with
Luxottica (see Note 22 to the accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements for further discussion). We
used our higher cash availability to reinvest in our business
through capital spending and acquisitions, as well as in
connection with the expansion of our common stock repurchase
program. In particular, we had $184 million of capital
expenditures primarily associated with retail store expansion,
construction and renovation of
shop-in-shops
in department stores and investments in our technological
infrastructure. We used $175 million to acquire the
remaining 50% equity interest in RL Media, our
e-commerce
subsidiary, that we did not previously own (see Recent
Developments for further discussion). We also acquired
3.5 million shares of Class A common stock at an
aggregate cost of $231.3 million.
Transactions
Affecting Comparability of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
The comparability of our operating results has been affected by
certain acquisitions that occurred in Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal
2005. In particular, we acquired the Polo Jeans Business on
February 3, 2006, the Footwear Business on July 15,
2005, and the Childrenswear Business on July 2, 2004 (each
as defined in Note 5 to the accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements). In addition, as noted above,
the comparability of our operating results also has been
affected by the change in accounting for stock-based
compensation effective as of the beginning of Fiscal 2007, and
by certain pre-tax charges related to restructurings, asset
impairments, and credit card and other litigation-related
contingencies during the fiscal years presented. A summary of
the effect of these items on pre-tax income for each period
presented is noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation costs
(see Note 18)
|
|
$
|
(43.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.9
|
)
|
Restructuring charges (see
Note 11)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
Impairments of retail assets (see
Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Credit card contingency charge
(see Note 15)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
Jones-related litigation charge
(see Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(51.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(122.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following discussion of results of operations highlights, as
necessary, the significant changes in operating results arising
from these items and transactions. However, unusual items or
transactions may occur in any period. Accordingly, investors and
other financial statement users individually should consider the
types of events and transactions that have affected operating
trends.
32
Recent
Developments
Japanese
Business Acquisitions
On May 29, 2007, the Company completed its previously
announced transactions to acquire control of certain of its
Japanese businesses that were formerly conducted under licensed
arrangements. In particular, the Company acquired approximately
77% of the outstanding shares of Impact 21 that it did not
previously own in a cash tender offer (the Impact 21
Acquisition), thereby increasing its ownership in Impact
21 from approximately 20% to 97%. Impact 21 conducts the
Companys mens, womens and jeans apparel and
accessories business in Japan under a
sub-license
arrangement. In addition, the Company acquired the remaining 50%
interest in Polo Ralph Lauren Japan Corporation (PRL
Japan), which holds the master license to conduct
Polos business in Japan, from Onward Kashiyama Co. Ltd and
its subsidiaries (Onward Kashiyama) and The Seibu
Department Stores, Ltd (the PRL Japan Minority Interest
Acquisition). Collectively, the Impact 21 Acquisition and
the PRL Japan Minority Interest Acquisition are hereafter
referred to as the Japanese Business Acquisitions.
The purchase price initially paid in connection with the Impact
21 Acquisition was approximately $327 million. However, the
Company intends to acquire, over the next several months, the
remaining approximately 3% of the outstanding shares not
exchanged as of the close of the tender offer period at an
estimated aggregate cost of approximately $12 million. In
addition, the purchase price paid in connection with the PRL
Japan Minority Interest Acquisition was approximately
$22 million.
The Company funded the Japanese Business Acquisitions with
available cash on-hand and approximately $170 million of
Yen-based borrowings under a one-year term loan agreement on
terms substantially similar to the Companys existing
credit facility. The Company expects to repay the borrowing by
its maturity date using a portion of the approximate
$200 million of Impact 21s cash on-hand acquired as
part of the acquisition.
The results of operations for Impact 21 will be consolidated
effective as of the beginning of Fiscal 2008. The results of
operations for PRL Japan already are consolidated by the Company
as described further in Note 2 to the accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements.
The Company is in the process of preparing its assessment of the
fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the
allocation of the purchase price. The Company also has entered
into a transition services agreement with Onward Kashiyama
which, along with its affiliates, was a former approximate 41%
shareholder of Impact 21, to provide a variety of
operational, human resources and information systems-related
services over a period of up to two years.
The Company does not expect the results of the Japanese Business
Acquisitions to contribute to its profitability until Fiscal
2009 primarily due to the dilutive effect of the anticipated
non-cash costs to be recognized in connection with the
allocation of a portion of the purchase price to inventory and
certain intangible assets.
Acquisition
of Small Leathergoods Business
On April 13, 2007, the Company acquired from Kellwood
Company (Kellwood) substantially all of the assets
of New Campaign, Inc., the Companys licensee for
mens and womens belts and other small leather goods
under the Ralph Lauren, Lauren and Chaps brands in the
U.S. The assets acquired from Kellwood will be operated
under the name of Polo Ralph Lauren Leathergoods and
will allow the Company to further expand its accessories
business. The acquisition cost was approximately
$10 million and is subject to customary closing
adjustments. Kellwood will provide various transition services
for up to six months after the closing.
The results of operations for the Polo Ralph Lauren Leathergoods
business will be consolidated in the Companys results of
operations commencing in Fiscal 2008.
Acquisition
of RL Media Minority Interest
On March 28, 2007, the Company acquired the remaining 50%
equity interest in Ralph Lauren Media, LLC (RL
Media) held by NBC Universal, Inc. and its related
entities (37.5%) and Value Vision International, Inc. and its
related entities (12.5%). RL Media conducts the Companys
e-commerce
initiatives through the Polo.com internet site and is
consolidated by the Company as the primary beneficiary pursuant
to the provisions of FIN 46R.
33
The acquisition cost was $175 million. In addition, Value
Vision International, Inc. entered into a transition services
agreement with the Company to provide order fulfillment and
related services over a period of up to seventeen months from
the date of the acquisition of the RL Media minority interest.
The Company expects the acquisition of the RL Media minority
interest to have a dilutive effect on profitability in Fiscal
2008 due primarily to the non-cash costs to be recognized in
connection with the allocation of a portion of the purchase
price to inventory and certain intangible assets.
Formation
of Ralph Lauren Watch and Jewelry Joint Venture
On March 5, 2007, the Company announced that it had agreed
to form a joint venture with Financiere Richemont SA
(Richemont), the Swiss Luxury Goods Group. The
50-50 joint
venture will be a Swiss corporation named the Ralph Lauren Watch
and Jewelry Company, S.A.R.L. (the RL Watch
Company), whose purpose is to design, develop,
manufacture, sell and distribute luxury watches and fine jewelry
through Ralph Lauren boutiques, as well as through fine
independent jewelry and luxury watch retailers throughout the
world. The Company expects to account for its 50% interest in
the RL Watch Company under the equity method of accounting.
Royalty payments due to the Company under the related license
agreement for use of certain of the Companys trademarks
will be reflected as licensing revenue within the consolidated
statement of operations. The RL Watch Company is expected to
commence operations during the first quarter of Fiscal 2008.
The Company expects to incur certain
start-up
costs in Fiscal 2008 to support the launch of this business.
However, the business is not expected to generate any sales
until Fiscal 2009 as products are scheduled to be launched in
the fall of calendar 2008.
Global
Brand Concepts and Launch of American Living
On January 8, 2007, the Company announced it will begin to
develop new lifestyle brands for specialty and department stores
through its Global Brand Concepts (GBC) group. The
GBC group will work in partnership with select department and
specialty stores and contribute its expertise in design,
operations, marketing, merchandising and advertising in
developing exclusive brands for those stores. Consistent with
this strategic initiative, on February 1, 2007, the Company
announced plans to launch American Living, a new
lifestyle brand created exclusively for J.C. Penney Company,
Inc. (JCPenney). American Living will include
a full range of merchandise for women, men and children, as well
as intimate apparel, accessories and home products.
The Company expects to incur certain
start-up
costs in Fiscal 2008 to support the launch of this new product
line. However, the Company is not expected to generate any
significant sales in Fiscal 2008 as the American Living
product line is not scheduled to be available at JCPenney
stores until the spring of calendar 2008.
Eyewear
Licensing Agreement
In February 2006, the Company announced that it had entered into
a ten-year exclusive licensing agreement with Luxottica Group,
S.p.A. and affiliates (Luxottica) for the design,
production, sale and distribution of prescription frames and
sunglasses under the Polo Ralph Lauren brand (the Eyewear
Licensing Agreement).
The Eyewear Licensing Agreement took effect on January 1,
2007 after the Companys pre-existing licensing agreement
with another licensee expired. In early January, the Company
received a prepayment of approximately $180 million, net of
certain tax withholdings, in consideration of the annual minimum
royalty and design-services fees to be earned over the life of
the contract. The prepayment is non-refundable, except with
respect to certain breaches of the agreement by the Company, in
which case only the unearned portion of the prepayment as
determined based on the specific terms of the agreement would be
required to be repaid (see Note 22 to the accompanying
audited consolidated financial statements for further
discussion).
See Note 5 to the accompanying audited consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of the
Companys acquisitions and joint venture formed during the
fiscal years presented.
34
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
The following table summarizes our results of operations and
expresses the percentage relationship to net revenues of certain
financial statements captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,295.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,746.3
|
|
|
$
|
549.1
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
Cost of goods
sold(a)
|
|
|
(1,959.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,723.9
|
)
|
|
|
(235.3
|
)
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,336.2
|
|
|
|
2,022.4
|
|
|
|
313.8
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
Gross profit as % of net
revenues
|
|
|
54.4
|
%
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses(a)
|
|
|
(1,663.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1,476.9
|
)
|
|
|
(186.5
|
)
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
SG&A as % of net
revenues
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
71.4
|
%
|
Impairments of retail assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
(48.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
652.6
|
|
|
|
516.6
|
|
|
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
Operating income as % of net
revenues
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency gains (losses)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
(73.7
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
72.8
|
%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
90.5
|
%
|
Equity in income of equity-method
investees
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(30.2
|
)%
|
Minority interest expense
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
643.3
|
|
|
|
502.9
|
|
|
|
140.4
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(242.4
|
)
|
|
|
(194.9
|
)
|
|
|
(47.5
|
)
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax
rate(b)
|
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
400.9
|
|
|
$
|
308.0
|
|
|
$
|
92.9
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
Basic
|
|
$
|
3.84
|
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
Diluted
|
|
$
|
3.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes total depreciation expense
of $129.1 million and $117.9 million for Fiscal 2007
and Fiscal 2006, respectively.
|
|
(b) |
|
Effective tax rate is calculated by
dividing the provision for income taxes by income before
provision for income taxes.
|
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased by
$549.1 million, or 14.7%, to $4.295 billion in Fiscal
2007 from $3.746 billion in Fiscal 2006. The increase was
experienced in all geographic regions and was due to a
combination of organic growth and acquisitions. Wholesale
revenues increased by $373.4 million, primarily as a result
of revenues from the newly acquired Polo Jeans Business, the
successful launch of the new Chaps for women and children
product lines, and increased sales in our global menswear and
womenswear product lines. The increase in net revenues also was
driven by a revenue increase of $184.6 million in our
Retail segment as a result of improved comparable global retail
store sales, continued store expansion (including our new Tokyo
flagship store) and growth in Polo.com sales. Licensing revenue
decreased by $8.9 million primarily due to the loss of
product licensing
35
revenue related to the Polo Jeans and Footwear Businesses (now
included as part of the Wholesale segment). Net revenues for our
three business segments are provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
2,315.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,942.5
|
|
|
$
|
373.4
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
Retail
|
|
|
1,743.2
|
|
|
|
1,558.6
|
|
|
|
184.6
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Licensing
|
|
|
236.3
|
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,295.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,746.3
|
|
|
$
|
549.1
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale net sales the net increase
primarily reflects:
|
|
|
|
|
the inclusion of $190 million of revenues from our newly
acquired Footwear and Polo Jeans Businesses;
|
|
|
|
a $156 million aggregate net increase led by our global
menswear, womenswear and childrenswear businesses, primarily
driven by strong growth in our Lauren product line, increased
full-price sell-through performance in our menswear business and
the effects from the successful domestic launch of our new Chaps
for women and children product lines. These increases were
partially offset by a decline in footwear sales (excluding the
impact from acquisition) due to our planned integration efforts
as we repositioned the related product line; and
|
|
|
|
a $27 million increase in revenues due to a favorable
foreign currency effect, primarily related to the strengthening
of the Euro in comparison to the U.S. dollar in Fiscal 2007.
|
Retail net sales For purposes of the
discussion of retail operating performance below, we refer to
the measure comparable store sales. Comparable store
sales refer to the growth of sales in stores that are open for
at least one full fiscal year. Sales for stores that are closing
during a fiscal year are excluded from the calculation of
comparable store sales. Sales for stores that are either
relocated, enlarged (as defined by gross square footage
expansion of 25% or greater) or closed for 30 or more
consecutive days for renovation are also excluded from the
calculation of comparable store sales until stores have been in
their location for at least a full fiscal year. Comparable store
sales information includes both Ralph Lauren stores and Club
Monaco stores.
The increase in retail net sales primarily reflects:
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate $104 million increase in comparable full-price
and factory store sales on a global basis. This increase was
driven by a 6.6% increase in comparable full-price Ralph Lauren
store sales, a 10.9% increase in comparable full-price Club
Monaco store sales, and an 8.1% increase in comparable factory
store sales. Excluding a net aggregate favorable $9 million
effect on revenues from foreign currency exchange rates,
comparable full-price Ralph Lauren store sales increased 5.7%,
comparable full-price Club Monaco store sales increased 10.9%,
and comparable factory store sales increased 7.5%;
|
|
|
|
an increase in sales from non-comparable stores, primarily
relating to new store openings within the past fiscal year.
There was a net increase in global store count of 3 stores
compared to the prior fiscal year, to a total of 292 stores. The
net increase in store count was primarily due to several new
openings of full-price stores, partially offset by the closure
of certain Club Monaco Caban Concept and factory stores and Polo
Jeans factory stores; and
|
|
|
|
a $26 million increase in sales at Polo.com.
|
Licensing revenue the net decrease primarily
reflects:
|
|
|
|
|
the loss of licensing revenues from our Polo Jeans and Footwear
Businesses now included as part of the Wholesale segment;
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
a decline in eyewear-related royalties due to the wind-down of
the Companys pre-existing licensing agreement prior to the
commencement of the new Eyewear Licensing Agreement which took
effect on January 1, 2007;
|
|
|
|
a decline in Home licensing royalties; and
|
|
|
|
a partially offsetting increase in international licensing
royalties and the accelerated receipt and recognition of
approximately $8 million of minimum royalty and
design-service fees in connection with the termination of a
domestic license agreement during Fiscal 2007.
|
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold
increased by $235.3 million, or 13.7%, to
$1.959 billion in Fiscal 2007 from $1.724 billion in
Fiscal 2006. Cost of goods sold expressed as a percentage of net
revenues decreased to 45.6% in Fiscal 2007 from 46.0% in Fiscal
2006. The net reduction in cost of goods sold as a percentage of
net revenues primarily reflects the ongoing focus on improved
inventory management, including sourcing efficiencies and
reduced markdown activity as a result of better full-price
sell-through of our products.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased by
$313.8 million, or 15.5%, to $2.336 billion in Fiscal
2007 from $2.022 billion in Fiscal 2006. Gross profit as a
percentage of net revenues also increased to 54.4% in Fiscal
2007 from 54.0% in Fiscal 2006. The increase in gross profit
reflected higher net sales and improved merchandise margins in
our wholesale and retail businesses, including the continued
emphasis on shifting the mix from off-price to full-price sales
across our wholesale product lines, as well as the focus on
improved inventory management discussed above. However, the
overall improvement in gross profit margins was partially offset
by the lower gross profit performance of our newly acquired Polo
Jeans Business associated with the liquidation of existing
inventory in anticipation of the redesign and launch of our new
denim and casual sportswear product lines during spring of
calendar 2007. Gross profit margins related to our Footwear
Business have also been negatively impacted during Fiscal 2007,
primarily by integration efforts as we repositioned the related
product line.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. SG&A expenses primarily include
compensation and benefits, marketing, distribution, information
technology, facilities, legal and other costs associated with
finance and administration. SG&A expenses increased by
$186.5 million, or 12.6%, to $1.663 billion in Fiscal
2007 from $1.477 billion in Fiscal 2006. SG&A expenses
as a percent of net revenues decreased to 38.7% in Fiscal 2007
from 39.4% in Fiscal 2006. The 70 basis point improvement
is primarily indicative of our ability to successfully leverage
our global infrastructure as we acquire businesses and grow
product lines organically. The $186.5 million net increase
in SG&A expenses was primarily driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
higher compensation-related expenses (excluding stock-based
compensation) of approximately $69 million, principally
relating to increased selling costs associated with higher
retail sales and our ongoing worldwide retail store and product
line expansion, and higher investment in infrastructure to
support the ongoing growth of our businesses;
|
|
|
|
the inclusion of SG&A costs for our newly acquired Footwear
and Polo Jeans Businesses, including costs incurred pursuant to
transition service arrangements;
|
|
|
|
a $38 million increase in brand-related marketing and
facilities costs to support the ongoing growth of our businesses;
|
|
|
|
an approximate $10 million increase in depreciation costs
in connection with our increased capital expenditures and global
expansion;
|
|
|
|
incremental stock-based compensation expense of approximately
$17 million as a result of the adoption of FAS 123R as
of April 2, 2006 (see Note 18 to the accompanying
audited consolidated financial statements for further
discussion); and
|
|
|
|
a net reduction in credit card contingency charges of
approximately $4 million.
|
The Company expects to incur significantly greater stock-based
compensation expense in Fiscal 2008 as compared to the related
expense recognized in Fiscal 2007 primarily due to the
approximate 45% increase in the Companys share price
during Fiscal 2007.
37
Amortization of Intangible
Assets. Amortization of intangible assets
increased by $6.5 million, to $15.6 million in Fiscal
2007 from $9.1 million in Fiscal 2006. The increase was due
to the amortization of intangible assets related to the Polo
Jeans Business acquired in February 2006 and the Footwear
Business acquired in July 2005.
Impairments of Retail Assets. A non-cash
impairment charge of $10.8 million was recognized during
Fiscal 2006 to reduce the carrying value of fixed assets largely
relating to our Club Monaco brand. No impairment charges were
recognized in Fiscal 2007.
Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges
decreased by $4.4 million, to $4.6 million in Fiscal
2007 from $9.0 million in Fiscal 2006. Restructuring
charges recognized in both periods were principally associated
with the Club Monaco retail business. See Note 11 to the
accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for
further discussion.
Operating Income. Operating income increased
by $136.0 million, or 26.3%, to $652.6 million in
Fiscal 2007 from $516.6 million in Fiscal 2006. Operating
income as a percentage of revenue increased 140 basis
points, to 15.2% in Fiscal 2007 from 13.8% in Fiscal 2006,
reflecting our revenue growth, gross profit percentage expansion
and improved SG&A expense leveraging. Operating income for
our three business segments is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
477.8
|
|
|
$
|
398.3
|
|
|
$
|
79.5
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
Retail
|
|
|
224.2
|
|
|
|
140.0
|
|
|
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
%
|
Licensing
|
|
|
141.6
|
|
|
|
153.5
|
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
843.6
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
151.8
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses
|
|
|
(183.4
|
)
|
|
|
(159.1
|
)
|
|
|
(24.3
|
)
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
Unallocated legal and
restructuring charges
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
(52.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$
|
652.6
|
|
|
$
|
516.6
|
|
|
$
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale operating income increased by
$79.5 million, primarily as a result of higher net sales
and improved gross margin rates in most product lines, as well
as the incremental contribution from the newly acquired Polo
Jeans Business and the new Chaps product lines. These increases
were partially offset by increases in SG&A expenses in
support of new product lines across all geographic territories
and higher amortization expenses associated with intangible
assets recognized in acquisitions.
Retail operating income increased by $84.2 million,
primarily as a result of increased net sales and improved gross
margin rates, as well as the absence of a non-cash impairment
charge of $10.8 million recognized in Fiscal 2006. These
increases were partially offset by an increase in selling
related salaries and associated costs in connection with the
increase in retail sales, including Polo.com, and worldwide
store expansion, including the new Tokyo flagship store.
Licensing operating income decreased by
$11.9 million primarily due to the loss of royalty income
formerly collected in connection with the Footwear and Polo
Jeans Businesses, which have now been acquired. The decline in
Home royalties also contributed to the decrease along with the
decline in eyewear royalties, due to the wind-down of the
Companys pre-existing licensing agreement. These decreases
were partially offset by an increase in international royalties,
as well as the accelerated receipt and recognition of
approximately $8 million of minimum royalty and
design-service fees in connection with the termination of a
domestic license agreement during Fiscal 2007.
Unallocated corporate expenses increased by
$24.3 million, primarily as a result of increases in
brand-related marketing, payroll-related and facilities costs to
support the ongoing growth of our businesses. The increase in
38
compensation-related costs includes higher stock-based
compensation expense due to the adoption of FAS 123R (as
further discussed in Note 18 to the accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements).
Unallocated legal and restructuring charges were
$7.6 million during Fiscal 2007, compared to
$16.1 million during Fiscal 2006. Fiscal 2007 charges were
principally associated with the Club Monaco Restructuring Plan
charges of $4.0 million (as defined in Note 11 to the
accompanying audited consolidated financial statements) and
costs of $3.0 million related to the Credit Card Matters
(as defined in Note 15 to the accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements). Fiscal 2006 charges also
primarily included the Club Monaco Restructuring Plan charges of
$9.0 million and legal costs of $6.8 million
associated with the Credit Card Matters.
Foreign Currency Gains (Losses). The effect of
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a loss
of $1.5 million in Fiscal 2007, compared to a loss of
$5.7 million in Fiscal 2006. The decrease in foreign
currency losses compared to the prior fiscal year is due to the
timing of the settlement of intercompany receivables and
payables (that were not of a long-term investment nature)
between certain of our international and domestic subsidiaries.
Foreign currency gains and losses are unrelated to the impact of
changes in the value of the U.S. dollar when operating
results of our foreign subsidiaries are translated to
U.S. dollars.
Interest Expense. Interest expense includes
the borrowing cost of our outstanding debt, including
amortization of debt issuance costs and the loss (gain) on
interest rate swap hedging contracts. Interest expense increased
by $9.1 million to $21.6 million in Fiscal 2007 from
$12.5 million in Fiscal 2006. The increase is primarily due
to an increase in interest on capitalized leases due to
additional obligations in Fiscal 2007 compared to the prior
fiscal year and overlapping interest on debt during the period
between the issuance of the 2006 Euro Debt and the repayment of
the 1999 Euro Debt. In addition, prior year interest expense was
favorably impacted by the interest rate swap agreements which
were terminated at the end of Fiscal 2006.
Interest Income. Interest income increased by
$12.4 million, to $26.1 million in Fiscal 2007 from
$13.7 million in Fiscal 2006. This increase is primarily
driven by higher average interest rates and higher balances on
our invested excess cash.
Equity in Income of Equity-Method
Investees. Equity in the income of equity-method
investees decreased by $1.3 million, to $3.0 million
in Fiscal 2007 from $4.3 million in Fiscal 2006. This
income relates to our 20% investment in Impact 21, a
company that holds the sublicense with PRL Japan for our
mens, womens and jeans businesses in Japan. See
Recent Developments for further discussion of
the Companys Japanese Business Acquisitions that occurred
in May 2007.
Minority Interest Expense. Minority interest
expense increased by $1.8 million, to $15.3 million in
Fiscal 2007 from $13.5 million in Fiscal 2006. The net
increase is primarily related to the improved operating
performance of RL Media compared to the prior period and the
associated allocation of income to the minority partners. As of
March 28, 2007, the Company acquired the remaining 50%
interest in RL Media held by the minority partners (see
Recent Developments for further discussion).
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for
income taxes represents federal, foreign, state and local income
taxes. The provision for income taxes increased by
$47.5 million, or 24.4%, to $242.4 million in Fiscal
2007 from $194.9 million in Fiscal 2006. This increase is a
result of the increase in our pre-tax income, partially offset
by a decrease in our reported effective tax rate, to 37.7% in
Fiscal 2007 from 38.8% in Fiscal 2006. The lower effective tax
rate is primarily due to a change in the mix of earnings, which
resulted in more income being taxed at lower rates than in the
previous fiscal year. The effective tax rate differs from
statutory rates due to the effect of state and local taxes, tax
rates in foreign jurisdictions and certain nondeductible
expenses. Our effective tax rate will change from
year-to-year
based on non-recurring and recurring factors including, but not
limited to, the geographic mix of earnings, the timing and
amount of foreign dividends, enacted tax legislation, state and
local taxes, tax audit findings and settlements, and the
interaction of various global tax strategies. See Critical
Accounting Policies for a discussion on the accounting for
uncertain tax positions and the Companys adoption of
FIN 48 in Fiscal 2008.
Net Income. Net income increased by
$92.9 million, or 30.2%, to $400.9 million in Fiscal
2007 from $308.0 million in Fiscal 2006. The increase in
net income principally related to our $136.0 million
increase in operating income, as previously discussed, offset in
part by an increase of $47.5 million in our provision for
income taxes.
39
Net Income Per Diluted Share. Net income per
diluted share increased by $0.86, or 30.0%, to $3.73 per
share in Fiscal 2007 from $2.87 per share in Fiscal 2006.
The increase in diluted per share results was primarily due to
the higher level of net income, partially offset by higher
weighted-average diluted shares outstanding for Fiscal 2007.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
The following table summarizes our results of operations and
expresses the percentage relationship to net revenues of certain
financial statements captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,746.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,305.4
|
|
|
$
|
440.9
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
Cost of goods
sold(a)
|
|
|
(1,723.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1,620.9
|
)
|
|
|
(103.0
|
)
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,022.4
|
|
|
|
1,684.5
|
|
|
|
337.9
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
Gross profit as % of net
revenues
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
51.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses(a)
|
|
|
(1,476.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1,377.6
|
)
|
|
|
(99.3
|
)
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
SG&A as % of net
revenues
|
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
|
|
41.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
167.6
|
%
|
Impairments of retail assets
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
|
620.0
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
291.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
516.6
|
|
|
|
299.7
|
|
|
|
216.9
|
|
|
|
72.4
|
%
|
Operating income as % of net
revenues
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency gains (losses)
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
(193.4
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
197.8
|
%
|
Equity in income of equity-method
investees
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(32.8
|
)%
|
Minority interest expense
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
68.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
502.9
|
|
|
|
297.8
|
|
|
|
205.1
|
|
|
|
68.9
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(194.9
|
)
|
|
|
(107.4
|
)
|
|
|
(87.5
|
)
|
|
|
81.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax
rate(b)
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
|
|
36.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
308.0
|
|
|
$
|
190.4
|
|
|
$
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
56.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes total depreciation expense
of $117.9 million and $98.7 million for Fiscal 2006
and Fiscal 2005, respectively.
|
|
(b) |
|
Effective tax rate is calculated by
dividing the provision for income taxes by income before
provision for income taxes.
|
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased by
$440.9 million, or 13.3%, to $3.746 billion in Fiscal
2006 from $3.305 billion in Fiscal 2005. Wholesale revenues
increased by $230.4 million, primarily as a result of
revenues from the sale of newly acquired Footwear and Polo Jeans
products, the inclusion of a full year of sales for our
childrenswear business, which was acquired in July 2004 (the
Childrenswear Business), the successful launch of
the Chaps for women and boys product lines, and increased sales
in our global menswear and womenswear product lines. The
increase in net revenues also was due to a $210.0 million
revenue increase in our Retail segment as a
40
result of improved comparable retail store sales, continued
store expansion and growth in Polo.com sales. Net revenues for
our three business segments are provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
1,942.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,712.1
|
|
|
$
|
230.4
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
Retail
|
|
|
1,558.6
|
|
|
|
1,348.6
|
|
|
|
210.0
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
Licensing
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
|
|
244.7
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,746.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,305.4
|
|
|
$
|
440.9
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale net sales the net increase
primarily reflects:
|
|
|
|
|
the inclusion of $58 million of revenue from the newly
acquired Footwear Business;
|
|
|
|
the inclusion of $35 million of revenues from the newly
acquired Polo Jeans Business;
|
|
|
|
a $74 million increase in revenues from our childrenswear
product line that was acquired in July 2004, including the
effects from the successful launch of our Chaps for boys product
line and a one-time benefit of $59 million due to the
inclusion of a full year of sales in Fiscal 2006;
|
|
|
|
a $73 million aggregate constant-dollar increase in our
global menswear and womenswear businesses, primarily driven by
strong growth in our Lauren product line and the effects from
the successful domestic launch of our Chaps for women product
line; and
|
|
|
|
a $14 million decrease in revenues due to an unfavorable
foreign currency effect relating to the strengthening of the
U.S. dollar in comparison to the Euro during Fiscal 2006.
|
Retail net sales the net increase primarily
reflects:
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate $74 million increase in comparable full-price
and factory store sales. This increase was driven by a 6.0%
increase in comparable full-price Ralph Lauren store sales, a
8.1% increase in comparable full-price Club Monaco store sales,
and a 6.3% increase in comparable factory store sales. Excluding
an unfavorable aggregate $4 million effect on revenues from
foreign currency exchange rates, comparable full-price Ralph
Lauren store sales increased 6.6%, comparable full-price Club
Monaco store sales increased 8.1%, and comparable factory store
sales increased 6.6%;
|
|
|
|
a net increase in global store count of 11 stores compared to
the prior year, to a total of 289 stores, as several new
openings were offset by the closure of certain Club Monaco
stores in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2006; and
|
|
|
|
a $29 million increase in sales at Polo.com.
|
Licensing revenues Licensing revenues were
essentially flat in Fiscal 2006 compared to Fiscal 2005, as
increased revenue from our international licensing business and
the domestic launch of the Chaps brand extensions for the
menswear and accessories businesses offset the decreases in
product licensing revenue resulting from our Fiscal 2006
purchase of the Footwear and Polo Jeans Businesses (now included
as part of the Wholesale segment).
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold
increased by $103.0 million, or 6.4%, to
$1.724 billion in Fiscal 2006 from $1.621 billion in
Fiscal 2005. Cost of goods sold expressed as a percentage of net
revenues decreased to 46.0% in Fiscal 2006 from 49.0% in Fiscal
2005. The net reduction in cost of goods sold as a percentage of
net revenues primarily reflected a continued focus on sourcing
efficiencies and reduced markdown activity as a result of better
full-price sell-through of our products.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased by
$337.9 million, or 20.1%, to $2.022 billion in Fiscal
2006 from $1.685 billion in Fiscal 2005. This increase
reflected higher net sales, improved merchandise margins and
sourcing efficiencies, generally across our wholesale and retail
businesses. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues also
41
increased to 54.0% in Fiscal 2006 from 51.0% in Fiscal 2005.
This 300 basis point increase resulted primarily from the
factors discussed above and a shift in mix away from off-price
sales towards more full-price sales in our Wholesale segment.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. SG&A expenses increased by
$99.3 million, or 7.2%, to $1.477 billion in Fiscal
2006 from $1.378 billion in Fiscal 2005. SG&A expenses
in Fiscal 2005 included a $100 million charge in connection
with the Jones-related Litigation. On a reported basis,
SG&A as a percent of net revenues decreased by 2.2%, to
39.4% in Fiscal 2006 from 41.7% in Fiscal 2005. However,
excluding the effect from the Jones-related Litigation charge,
SG&A as a percentage of net revenues increased by 0.8%, to
39.4% in Fiscal 2006 from 38.7% in Fiscal 2005. Excluding the
Jones-related Litigation charge, the $199.3 million net
increase in SG&A was primarily driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
higher payroll-related expenses of approximately
$89 million, principally related to increased selling costs
associated with higher retail sales and our worldwide retail
store expansion, higher stock-based compensation charges
associated with our strong operating performance and increasing
stock price, and higher investment in infrastructure to support
the ongoing growth of our businesses;
|
|
|
|
an increase in brand-related marketing and facilities costs of
approximately $69 million to support the ongoing growth of
our businesses;
|
|
|
|
higher depreciation costs of approximately $19 million in
connection with our increased capital expenditures and global
expansion; and
|
|
|
|
the inclusion of SG&A costs for our newly acquired Footwear
and Polo Jeans Businesses, and the costs for the Childrenswear
Business for a full year.
|
Amortization of Intangible
Assets. Amortization of intangible assets
increased by $5.7 million, to $9.1 million in Fiscal
2006 from $3.4 million in Fiscal 2005. The increase related
to the addition of intangible assets acquired as part of the
Childrenswear Business in July 2004, the Footwear Business in
July 2005 and the Polo Jeans Business in February 2006.
Impairments of Retail Assets. A non-cash
impairment charge of $10.8 million was recognized during
Fiscal 2006 to reduce the carrying value of fixed assets used in
certain of our retail stores, largely related to our Club Monaco
retail business that includes our Caban Concept and Club Monaco
factory stores. This impairment charge primarily related to
lower-than-expected
store performance and preceded the implementation of a plan to
restructure these operations in February 2006. A
$1.5 million impairment charge also was recognized in
Fiscal 2005 related to Club Monaco retail stores.
Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges
increased by $6.7 million, to $9.0 million in Fiscal
2006 from $2.3 million in Fiscal 2005. The Fiscal 2006
restructuring charge related to the Club Monaco retail business
and included the intended closure of all five Club Monaco
factory stores and the intended disposal of all eight of Club
Monacos Caban Concept stores. The Fiscal 2005
restructuring charge principally related to severance
obligations incurred in connection with a consolidation of our
European operations.
42
Operating Income. Operating income increased
by $216.9 million, or 72.4%, to $516.6 million in
Fiscal 2006 from $299.7 million in Fiscal 2005. Operating
income for Fiscal 2005 was reduced by the $100 million
Jones-related Litigation charge. Operating income for our three
business segments is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
398.3
|
|
|
$
|
299.7
|
|
|
$
|
98.6
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
Retail
|
|
|
140.0
|
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|
57.2
|
|
|
|
69.1
|
%
|
Licensing
|
|
|
153.5
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
542.0
|
|
|
|
149.8
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses
|
|
|
(159.1
|
)
|
|
|
(133.8
|
)
|
|
|
(25.3
|
)
|
|
|
18.9
|
%
|
Unallocated legal and
restructuring charges
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
|
|
(108.5
|
)
|
|
|
92.4
|
|
|
|
(85.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$
|
516.6
|
|
|
$
|
299.7
|
|
|
$
|
216.9
|
|
|
|
72.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale operating income increased by
$98.6 million, primarily as a result of higher sales and
improved gross margin rates, partially offset by increases in
SG&A expenses and higher amortization expenses associated
with intangible assets recognized in acquisitions.
Retail operating income increased by $57.2 million,
primarily as a result of increased net sales and improved gross
margin rates. These increases were partially offset by an
increase in selling salaries and related costs in connection
with the increase in retail sales and worldwide store expansion,
along with higher retail store impairment charges.
Licensing operating income decreased by
$6.0 million, primarily due to the loss of royalty income
formerly collected in connection with the Footwear, Polo Jeans,
and Childrenswear Businesses, which have now been acquired. This
decrease was partially offset by improved sell-through in our
international licensing businesses.
Unallocated corporate expenses increased by
$25.3 million, primarily as a result of increases in
brand-related marketing, payroll-related and facilities costs to
support the ongoing growth of our businesses.
Unallocated legal and restructuring
charges. Unallocated legal and restructuring
charges decreased by $92.4 million, to $16.1 million
in Fiscal 2006 from $108.5 million in Fiscal 2005.
Unallocated legal and restructuring charges included a
$100 million Jones-related Litigation charge in Fiscal
2005. No related charge was recognized in Fiscal 2006. The
decrease was offset in part by higher restructuring charges of
$9.0 million related to the Club Monaco Restructuring Plan
and legal costs of $6.8 million associated with the credit
card contingency recognized in Fiscal 2006.
Foreign Currency Gains (Losses). The effect of
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a loss
of $5.7 million during Fiscal 2006, compared to a
$6.1 million gain during Fiscal 2005. The increased losses
in Fiscal 2006 primarily related to unfavorable foreign exchange
movements associated with intercompany receivables and payables
that were not of a long-term investment nature and were settled
by our international subsidiaries. These gains and losses are
unrelated to the impact of changes in the value of the
U.S. dollar when operating results of our foreign
subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
by $1.5 million, to $12.5 million in Fiscal 2006 from
$11.0 million in Fiscal 2005. This increase was principally
related to higher variable interest rates during the year under
our interest rate swap agreements that were subsequently
terminated.
Interest Income. Interest income increased by
$9.1 million, to $13.7 million in Fiscal 2006 from
$4.6 million in Fiscal 2005. This increase principally
related to a higher level of excess cash reinvestment and higher
interest rates on our investments during Fiscal 2006.
43
Equity in Income of Equity-Method
Investees. Equity in the income of equity-method
investees decreased by $2.1 million, to $4.3 million
in Fiscal 2006 from $6.4 million in Fiscal 2005. The
decrease principally related to higher amortization in Fiscal
2006 of a basis difference associated with our 20% investment in
Impact 21. See Recent Developments for
further discussion of the Companys Japanese Business
Acquisitions that occurred in May 2007.
Minority Interest Expense. Minority interest
expense increased by $5.5 million, to $13.5 million in
Fiscal 2006 from $8.0 million in Fiscal 2005. The net
increase is primarily related to the improved operating
performance of RL Media compared to the prior period and the
associated allocation of income to the minority partners. As of
March 28, 2007, the Company acquired the remaining 50%
interest in RL Media held by the minority partners (see
Recent Developments for further discussion).
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for
income taxes increased by $87.5 million, or 81.5%, to
$194.9 million in Fiscal 2006 from $107.4 million in
Fiscal 2005. This increase is a result of an increase in our
effective tax rate to 38.8% in Fiscal 2006 from 36.1% in Fiscal
2005, as well as the increase in our pre-tax income. The
increase in our effective tax rate principally resulted from the
continued growth of our domestic wholesale and retail
businesses, which led to a higher state tax impact.
Net Income. Net income increased by
$117.6 million, or 61.8%, to $308.0 million in Fiscal
2006 from $190.4 million in Fiscal 2005. The increase in
net income principally related to the $216.9 million
increase in operating income previously discussed, including the
effect of the $100 million Jones-related Litigation charge
recognized in Fiscal 2005. These benefits were offset in part by
higher foreign currency losses of $11.8 million and higher
taxes of $87.5 million.
Net Income Per Diluted Share. Net income per
diluted share increased by $1.04, or 56.8%, to $2.87 in Fiscal
2006 from $1.83 in Fiscal 2005. The improvement in diluted per
share results was due to the higher level of net income and the
absence of the $100 million Jones-related Litigation charge
recognized in Fiscal 2005, offset in part by higher dilution
associated with higher average shares outstanding in Fiscal 2006.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
563.9
|
|
|
$
|
285.7
|
|
|
$
|
278.2
|
|
Current maturities of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280.4
|
)
|
|
|
280.4
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(398.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(398.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash(a)
|
|
$
|
165.1
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
159.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,334.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,049.6
|
|
|
$
|
285.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Defined as total cash and cash
equivalents less total debt.
|
The increase in the Companys net cash position principally
relates to its growth in operating cash flows (including
approximately $180 million of net proceeds received in
conjunction with the Eyewear Licensing Agreement) and the excess
proceeds raised through the third-quarter refinancing of its
Euro debt, partially offset by the $175 million use of cash
to fund the acquisition of the remaining 50% equity interest in
RL Media that it did not previously own, $184 million of
capital expenditures and $231 million to repurchase shares
of common stock in connection with its common stock repurchase
program. The increase in stockholders equity principally
relates to the Companys strong earnings growth during
Fiscal 2007 and proceeds received from the exercise of stock
options, offset in part by the effects from its common stock
repurchase program.
44
Cash
Flows
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
796.1
|
|
|
$
|
449.1
|
|
|
$
|
347.0
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(434.6
|
)
|
|
|
(539.2
|
)
|
|
|
104.6
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
(95.2
|
)
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
(128.7
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
278.2
|
|
|
$
|
(64.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
343.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities. Net
cash provided by operating activities increased to
$796.1 million during Fiscal 2007, compared to
$449.1 million for Fiscal 2006. This $347.0 million
increase in operating cash flow was driven primarily by the
increase in net income, the receipt of approximately
$180 million under the new Eyewear Licensing Agreement (net
of certain tax withholdings) and the absence of the
$100 million payment to settle the Jones-related Litigation
in Fiscal 2006, partially offset by higher tax payments made in
Fiscal 2007. Also offsetting the increase in operating cash flow
was an increase in working capital needs during Fiscal 2007,
primarily as a result of recent expansions and the overall
growth in the business. This increase was partially offset by a
decrease in accounts receivable days sales outstanding as a
result of improved cash collections in the Companys
Wholesale segment. On a comparative basis, operating cash flows
were reduced by $33.7 million as a result of a change in
the reporting of excess tax benefits from stock-based
compensation arrangements. That is, prior to the adoption of
FAS 123R, benefits of tax deductions in excess of
recognized compensation costs were reported as operating cash
flows. FAS 123R requires excess tax benefits to be reported
as a financing cash inflow rather than in operating cash flows
as a reduction of taxes paid.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities. Net
cash used in investing activities was $434.6 million for
Fiscal 2007, as compared to $539.2 million for Fiscal 2006.
The net decrease in cash used in investing activities is
primarily due to acquisition-related activities. In Fiscal 2007,
the Company used $175 million to fund the acquisition of
the remaining 50% equity interest in RL Media that it did not
previously own, whereas in Fiscal 2006, approximately
$380 million was used primarily to fund the acquisition of
the Polo Jeans and Footwear Businesses. In addition, net cash
used in investing activities for Fiscal 2007 included
$74.5 million of restricted cash placed in escrow with
certain banks as collateral to secure guarantees of a
corresponding amount made by the banks to certain international
tax authorities on behalf of the Company (see Note 3 to the
accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for
further discussion). Net cash used in investing activities also
included $184.0 million relating to capital expenditures,
as compared to $158.6 million in the comparable prior year.
Net Cash (Used in)/Provided by Financing
Activities. Net cash used in financing activities
was $95.2 million for Fiscal 2007, compared to net cash
provided by financing activities of $33.5 million in Fiscal
2006. The increase in net cash used in financing activities
during Fiscal 2007 principally related to the repayment of
approximately 227 million principal amount
($291.6 million) of the Companys 1999 Euro Debt and
the repurchase of 3.5 million shares of Class A common
stock pursuant to its common stock repurchase program at a cost
of $231.3 million. Partially offsetting the increase was
the receipt of proceeds from the issuance of
300 million principal amount (approximately
$380 million) of 2006 Euro Debt. This net increase in cash
used in financing activities was partially offset by the change
in the reporting of excess tax benefits from stock-based
compensation arrangements of $33.7 million.
45
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
449.1
|
|
|
$
|
382.0
|
|
|
$
|
67.1
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(539.2
|
)
|
|
|
(417.4
|
)
|
|
|
(121.8
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(64.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(63.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities. Net
cash provided by operating activities increased to
$449.1 million during Fiscal 2006, compared to
$382.0 million in Fiscal 2005. This $67.1 million
increase in cash flow was driven primarily by an increase in net
income and lower working capital requirements, partially offset
by a $100 million payment to settle the Jones-related
Litigation. The lower working capital requirements in Fiscal
2006 primarily related to a decrease in accounts receivable days
sales outstanding as a result of improved cash collections in
the Companys Wholesale segment, partially offset by higher
inventory balances primarily due to the newly acquired Polo
Jeans and Footwear Businesses.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities. Net
cash used in investing activities was $539.2 million in
Fiscal 2006, compared to $417.4 million in Fiscal 2005. The
increase in cash used in investing activities principally
related to acquisition-related activities. In Fiscal 2006, the
Company used approximately $380 million primarily to fund
the acquisition of the Polo Jeans and Footwear Businesses,
whereas in Fiscal 2005, approximately $243 million was used
principally to fund the acquisition of the Childrenswear
Business. In addition, net cash used in investing activities
included capital expenditures of $158.6 million in Fiscal
2006, compared to $174.1 million in Fiscal 2005.
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities. Net
cash provided by financing activities was $33.5 million in
Fiscal 2006, compared to $31.5 million in Fiscal 2005. The
$2.0 million increase in cash provided by financing
activities was primarily related to the settlement of an
interest rate swap agreement and an increase in proceeds
received from the exercise of stock options, partially offset by
the cost associated with repurchases of common stock. The
Company repurchased common stock under its common stock
repurchase program at an aggregate cost of approximately
$4 million in Fiscal 2006. No shares of common stock were
repurchased in Fiscal 2005. Proceeds received from the exercise
of stock options were approximately $55 million in Fiscal
2006, compared to approximately $53 million in Fiscal 2005.
Cash dividends paid were approximately $21 million in
Fiscal 2006, compared to approximately $22 million in
Fiscal 2005.
Liquidity
The Companys primary sources of liquidity are the cash
flow generated from its operations, $450 million of
availability under its credit facility, available cash and
equivalents and other potential sources of financial capacity
relating to its under-leveraged capital structure. These sources
of liquidity are needed to fund the Companys ongoing cash
requirements, including working capital requirements, retail
store expansion, construction and renovation of
shop-in-shops,
investment in technological infrastructure, acquisitions,
dividends, debt repayment, stock repurchases and other corporate
activities. Management believes that the Companys existing
resources of cash will be sufficient to support its operating
and capital requirements for the foreseeable future, including
the acquisitions and plans for business expansion discussed
above under the section entitled Recent
Developments.
As discussed below under the section entitled Debt and
Covenant Compliance, the Company had no borrowings
under its credit facility as of March 31, 2007. However, as
discussed further below, the Company may elect to draw on its
credit facility or other potential sources of financing for,
among other things, a material acquisition, settlement of a
material contingency or a material adverse business development.
Also, as discussed below, in October 2006, the Company completed
the issuance of 300 million principal amount of 2006
Euro Debt. The Company used the net proceeds from the financing
to repay approximately 227 principal amount of its 1999
Euro Debt. The balance of such proceeds was used for general
corporate and working capital purposes. The
46
Company also amended its Credit Facility in November 2006, which
extended the term to 2011, as a result of recent upgrades in the
Companys credit ratings from Standard & Poors
(to BBB+) and Moodys (to Baa1). See Revolving Credit
Facility described below.
In May 2007, the Company completed the Japanese Business
Acquisitions. These transactions were funded with available cash
on-hand and approximately $170 million of Yen-based
borrowings under a one-year term loan agreement on terms
substantially similar to the Companys existing credit
facility (the Term Loan). Borrowings under the Term
Loan bear interest at a LIBOR rate for yen loans for an interest
period of 12 months plus the applicable margin. The
maturity date of the Term Loan is on the
12-month
anniversary of the drawing date of the Term Loan. The Company
expects to repay the borrowing by its maturity date using a
portion of Impact 21s cash on-hand of approximately
$200 million acquired as part of the acquisition.
Common
Stock Repurchase Program
In November 2006, the Companys Board of Directors approved
an expansion of the Companys existing common stock
repurchase program that allows the Company to repurchase up to
$500 million of Class A common stock. Repurchases of
shares of Class A common stock are subject to overall
business and market conditions. In Fiscal 2007, share
repurchases under the expanded and pre-existing programs
amounted to 3.5 million shares of Class A common stock
at a cost of $231.3 million. The remaining availability
under the common stock repurchase program was
$368.3 million as of March 31, 2007.
In Fiscal 2006, the Company repurchased 69.3 thousand shares of
Class A common stock at a cost of approximately
$4 million. No shares of Class A common stock were
repurchased in Fiscal 2005.
Dividends
The Company intends to continue to pay regular quarterly
dividends on its outstanding common stock. However, any decision
to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the
discretion of the Companys Board of Directors and will
depend on, among other things, the Companys results of
operations, cash requirements, financial condition and other
factors that the Board of Directors may deem relevant.
The Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per
outstanding share in each quarter of Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal
2006. The aggregate amount of dividend payments was
$21 million in Fiscal 2007, $21 million in Fiscal 2006
and $22 million in Fiscal 2005.
Debt
and Covenant Compliance
Euro
Debt
The Company had outstanding approximately 227 million
principal amount of 6.125% notes that were due on
November 22, 2006, from an original issuance of
275 million in 1999 (the 1999 Euro Debt).
On October 5, 2006, the Company completed a new issuance of
300 million principal amount of 4.50% notes due
October 4, 2013 (the 2006 Euro Debt). The
Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the financing of
approximately $380 million (based on the exchange rate in
effect upon issuance) to repay the remaining 1999 Euro Debt at
par on its maturity date. The balance of such net proceeds was
used for general corporate and working capital purposes. The
Company has the option to redeem all of the 2006 Euro Debt at
any time at a redemption price equal to the principal amount
plus a premium. The Company also has the option to redeem all of
the 2006 Euro Debt at any time at par plus accrued interest, in
the event of certain developments involving U.S. tax law.
Partial redemption of the 2006 Euro Debt is not permitted in
either instance. In the event of a change of control of the
Company, each holder of the 2006 Euro Debt has the option to
require the Company to redeem the 2006 Euro Debt at its
principal amount plus accrued interest.
As of March 31, 2007, the carrying value of the 2006 Euro
Debt was $398.8 million.
47
Revolving
Credit Facility and Term Loan
The Company has a credit facility, which was amended on
November 28, 2006, that provides for a $450 million
unsecured revolving line of credit (the Credit
Facility). The Credit Facility also is used to support the
issuance of letters of credit. As of March 31, 2007, there
were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility, but
the Company was contingently liable for $25.7 million of
outstanding letters of credit (primarily relating to inventory
purchase commitments).
The Company amended certain terms of its Credit Facility as a
result of recent upgrades in its credit ratings from
Standard & Poors and Moodys. Key changes under
the amendment include:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in the ability of the Company to expand its
additional borrowing availability from $525 million to
$600 million, subject to the agreement of one or more new
or existing lenders under the facility to increase their
commitments;
|
|
|
|
An extension of the term of the Credit Facility to November 2011
from October 2009;
|
|
|
|
A reduction in the margin over LIBOR paid by the Company on
amounts drawn under the Credit Facility to 35 basis points
from 50 basis points;
|
|
|
|
A reduction in the commitment fee for the unutilized portion of
the Credit Facility to 8 basis points from 12.5 basis
points; and
|
|
|
|
The elimination of the coverage ratio financial covenant.
|
There are no mandatory reductions in borrowing availability
throughout the term of the Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at the
Companys option, either at (a) a base rate determined
by reference to the higher of (i) the prime commercial
lending rate of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. in effect from time
to time and (ii) the weighted-average overnight Federal
funds rate (as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York) plus 50 basis points or (b) a LIBOR rate in
effect from time to time, as adjusted for the Federal Reserve
Boards Euro currency liabilities maximum reserve
percentage plus a margin defined in the Credit Facility
(the applicable margin). The applicable margin of
35 basis points is subject to adjustment based on the
Companys credit ratings.
The Credit Facility was amended as of May 22, 2007 to
provide for the addition of a loan in a Japanese yen amount
equal to approximately $170 million. The Term Loan was made
to Polo JP Acqui B.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company,
and is guaranteed by the Company, as well as the other
subsidiaries of the Company which currently guarantee the Credit
Facility. The proceeds of the Term Loan have been used to
finance the Tender Offer and the total related acquisition cost
and the acquisition by the Company of the remaining 50% of the
shares of PRL Japan the Company did not previously own.
Borrowings under the Term Loan bear interest at a LIBOR rate for
yen loans for an interest period of 12 months plus the
applicable margin. The maturity date of the Term Loan is on the
12-month
anniversary of the drawing date of the Term Loan. The Company
expects to repay the borrowing by its maturity date using a
portion of Impact 21s cash on-hand of approximately
$200 million acquired as part of the acquisition. See
Recent Developments for further discussion of
the Japanese Business Acquisitions.
In addition to paying interest on any outstanding borrowings
under the Credit Facility, the Company is required to pay a
commitment fee to the lenders under the Credit Facility in
respect of the unutilized commitments. The commitment fee rate
of 8 basis points under the terms of the Credit Facility
also is subject to adjustment based on the Companys credit
ratings.
The Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among
other things, restrict the Companys ability, subject to
specified exceptions, to incur additional debt; incur liens and
contingent liabilities; sell or dispose of assets, including
equity interests; merge with or acquire other companies;
liquidate or dissolve itself; engage in businesses that are not
in a related line of business; make loans, advances or
guarantees; engage in transactions with affiliates; and make
investments. In addition, the Credit Facility requires the
Company to maintain a maximum ratio of Adjusted Debt to
Consolidated EBITDAR (the leverage ratio), as such
terms are defined in the Credit Facility. As of March 31,
2007, no Event of Default (as such term is defined pursuant to
the Credit Facility) has occurred under the Companys
Credit Facility.
48
Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default under the Credit
Facility, the lenders may cease making loans, terminate the
Credit Facility, and declare all amounts outstanding to be
immediately due and payable. The Credit Facility specifies a
number of events of default (many of which are subject to
applicable grace periods), including, among others, the failure
to make timely principal and interest payments or to satisfy the
covenants, including the financial covenant described above.
Additionally, the Credit Facility provides that an Event of
Default will occur if Mr. Ralph Lauren, the Companys
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and related entities fail
to maintain a specified minimum percentage of the voting power
of the Companys common stock.
Contractual
and Other Obligations
Firm
Commitments
The following table summarizes certain of the Companys
aggregate contractual obligations as of March 31, 2007, and
the estimated timing and effect that such obligations are
expected to have on the Companys liquidity and cash flow
in future periods. The Company expects to fund the firm
commitments with operating cash flow generated in the normal
course of business and, if necessary, availability under its
$450 million credit facility or other potential sources of
financing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2013 and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009-2010
|
|
|
2011-2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Euro debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
398.8
|
|
|
$
|
398.8
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
156.7
|
|
|
|
279.2
|
|
|
|
208.2
|
|
|
|
556.8
|
|
|
|
1,200.9
|
|
Inventory purchase commitments
|
|
|
507.2
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
665.5
|
|
|
$
|
285.6
|
|
|
$
|
210.8
|
|
|
$
|
978.8
|
|
|
$
|
2,140.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a description of the Companys material,
firmly committed contractual obligations as of March 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Euro Debt represents the principal amount due at maturity
of the Companys outstanding Euro Debt on a
U.S. dollar-equivalent basis. Amounts do not include any
fair value adjustments, call premiums or interest payments;
|
|
|
|
Lease Obligations represent the minimum lease rental
payments under noncancelable leases for the Companys real
estate and operating equipment in various locations around the
world. Approximately 67% of these lease obligations relates to
the Companys retail operations. Information has been
presented separately for operating and capital leases. In
addition to such amounts, the Company is normally required to
pay taxes, insurance and occupancy costs relating to its leased
real estate properties; and
|
|
|
|
Inventory Purchase Commitments represent the
Companys legally binding agreements to purchase fixed or
minimum quantities of goods at determinable prices.
|
The Company also has certain contractual arrangements that would
require it to make payments if certain circumstances occur. See
Note 15 to the accompanying audited consolidated financial
statements for a description of the Companys contingent
commitments not included in the above table.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The Companys off-balance sheet firm commitments, which
include outstanding letters of credit and minimum funding
commitments to investees, amounted to approximately
$35.9 million as of March 31, 2007. At the end of
Fiscal 2007, the Company also was committed to pay a purchase
price of approximately $10 million in connection with the
acquisition of New Campaign, which closed in April 2007.
The Company does not maintain any other off-balance sheet
arrangements, transactions, obligations or other relationships
with unconsolidated entities that would be expected to have a
material current or future effect upon its financial condition
or results of operations.
49
MARKET
RISK MANAGEMENT
The Company has exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange
rates relating to certain anticipated cash flows generated by
its international operations and possible declines in the fair
value of reported net assets of certain of its foreign
operations, as well as exposure to changes in the fair value of
its fixed-rate debt relating to changes in interest rates.
Consequently, the Company periodically uses derivative financial
instruments to manage such risks. The Company does not enter
into derivative transactions for speculative purposes. The
Company monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of,
the financial institutions that are party to any of its
financial transactions. Credit risk related to derivative
financial instruments is considered low because the agreements
are entered into with strong creditworthy counterparties. The
following is a summary of the Companys risk management
strategies and the effect of those strategies on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
Foreign
Currency Risk Management
Foreign
Currency Exchange Contracts
The Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts as
hedges primarily relating to identifiable currency positions to
reduce its risk from exchange rate fluctuations on inventory
purchases and intercompany royalty payments made by certain of
its international operations. As part of its overall strategy to
manage the level of exposure to the risk of foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations, primarily exposure to changes in the
value of the Euro and the Japanese Yen, the Company hedges a
portion of its foreign currency exposures anticipated over the
ensuing twelve-month to two-year period. In doing so, the
Company uses foreign exchange contracts that generally have
maturities of three months to two years to provide continuing
coverage throughout the hedging period.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had contracts for the
sale of $214 million of foreign currencies at fixed rates.
Of these $214 million of sales contracts, $180 million
were for the sale of Euros and $34 million were for the
sale of Japanese Yen. The total fair value of the forward
contracts was an unrealized loss of $1.9 million. As of
April 1, 2006, the Company had contracts for the sale of
$90 million of foreign currencies at fixed rates. Of these
$90 million of sales contracts, $22 million were for
the sale of Euros and $68 million were for the sale of
Japanese Yen. The total fair value of the forward contracts was
an unrealized loss of $1.8 million.
The Company records foreign currency exchange contracts at fair
value in its balance sheet and designates these derivative
instruments as cash flow hedges in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and
subsequent amendments (collectively, FAS 133).
As such, the related gains or losses on these contracts are
deferred in stockholders equity as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income. These deferred gains and
losses are then either recognized in income in the period in
which the related royalties being hedged are received, or in the
case of inventory purchases, recognized as part of the cost of
the inventory being hedged when sold. However, to the extent
that any of these foreign currency exchange contracts are not
considered to be perfectly effective in offsetting the change in
the value of the royalties or inventory purchases being hedged,
any changes in fair value relating to the ineffective portion of
these contracts are immediately recognized in earnings. No
significant gains or losses relating to ineffective hedges were
recognized in the periods presented.
The Company had deferred net losses on foreign currency exchange
contracts in the amount of approximately $2 million at the
end of Fiscal 2007, all of which is expected to be recognized in
earnings in Fiscal 2008. Net losses on foreign currency exchange
contracts in the amount of approximately $1 million were
deferred at the end of Fiscal 2006. The Company recognized net
gains on foreign currency exchange contracts in earnings of
approximately $4 million for Fiscal 2007 and
$5 million for Fiscal 2006.
Based on the foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding as
of March 31, 2007, a 10% devaluation of the
U.S. dollar as compared to the level of foreign currency
exchange rates for currencies under contract as of
March 31, 2007 would result in approximately
$19 million of net unrealized losses. Conversely, a 10%
appreciation of the U.S. dollar would result in
approximately $19 million of net unrealized gains. Because
the foreign currency exchange contracts are designated as cash
flow hedges of forecasted transactions, the unrealized loss or
gain as a result of a 10% devaluation or appreciation would be
largely offset by changes in the underlying hedged items.
50
Subsequent to the end of Fiscal 2007, the Company entered into
foreign currency option contracts with a notional value of
$159 million for the right, but not the obligation, to
purchase foreign currencies at fixed rates. These contracts
hedged the majority of the foreign currency exposure related to
the financing of the Japanese Business Acquisitions, but do not
qualify under FAS 133 for hedge accounting treatment. The
Company will recognize a gain or loss, limited to the premium
paid for the option contracts, upon the settlement of the
contracts during the first quarter of Fiscal 2008.
Hedge of
a Net Investment in Certain European Subsidiaries
Prior to the Companys repayment of the 1999 Euro Debt in
November 2006, the entire principal amount was designated as a
hedge of the Companys net investment in certain of its
European subsidiaries in accordance with FAS 133.
Contemporaneous with this repayment, the Company designated the
entire principal amount of the 2006 Euro Debt, issued in October
2006 (see Note 13 to the accompanying audited consolidated
financial statements for further discussion), as a hedge of its
net investment in certain of its European subsidiaries. As
required by FAS 133, the changes in fair value of a
derivative instrument or a non-derivative financial instrument
(such as debt) that is designated as, and is effective as, a
hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation are reported in
the same manner as a translation adjustment under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, Foreign
Currency Translation, to the extent it is effective as a
hedge. As such, changes in the fair value of the 1999 Euro Debt
and the 2006 Euro Debt resulting from changes in the Euro
exchange rate have been, and continue to be, reported in
stockholders equity as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income. The Company recorded aggregate gains
(losses), net of tax, in stockholders equity on the
translation of the 1999 Euro Debt and 2006 Euro Debt to
U.S. dollars in the amount of approximately
$(19) million for Fiscal 2007, $4 million for Fiscal
2006 and $(18) million for Fiscal 2005.
Interest
Rate Risk Management
Historically, the Company has used floating-rate interest rate
swap agreements to hedge changes in the fair value of its
fixed-rate 1999 Euro Debt. These interest rate swap agreements,
which effectively converted fixed interest rate payments on the
Companys 1999 Euro Debt to a floating-rate basis, were
designated as a fair value hedge in accordance with
FAS 133. All interest rate swap agreements were terminated
in late Fiscal 2006 and there were no outstanding agreements at
the end of Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006.
During the first six months of Fiscal 2007, the Company entered
into three forward-starting interest rate swap contracts
aggregating 200 million notional amount of
indebtedness in anticipation of the Companys proposed
refinancing of the 1999 Euro Debt, which was completed in
October 2006. The Company designated these agreements as a cash
flow hedge of a forecasted transaction to issue new debt in
connection with the planned refinancing of its 1999 Euro Debt.
The interest rate swaps hedged a total of
200.0 million, a portion of the underlying interest
rate exposure on the anticipated refinancing. Under the terms of
the three interest swap contracts, the Company paid a
weighted-average fixed rate of interest of 4.1% and received
variable interest based upon six-month EURIBOR. The Company
terminated the swaps on September 28, 2006, which was the
date the interest rate for the 2006 Euro Debt was determined. As
a result, the Company made a payment of approximately
3.5 million ($4.4 million based on the exchange
rate in effect on that date) in settlement of the swaps. An
amount of $0.2 million was recognized as a loss for the
three months ending September 30, 2006 due to the partial
ineffectiveness of the cash flow hedge as a result of the
forecasted transaction closing on October 5, 2006 instead
of November 22, 2006 (the maturity date of the 1999 Euro
Debt). The remaining loss of $4.2 million has been deferred
as a component of comprehensive income within stockholders
equity and is being recognized in income as an adjustment to
interest expense over the seven-year term of the 2006 Euro Debt.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had no variable-rate debt
outstanding. As such, the Companys exposure to changes in
interest rates primarily related to its fixed-rate 2006 Euro
Debt. As of March 31, 2007, the carrying value of the 2006
Euro Debt was $398.8 million and the fair value was
$394.7 million. A 25 basis point increase or decrease
in the level of interest rates would, respectively, decrease or
increase the fair value of the 2006 Euro Debt by approximately
$5 million. Such potential increases or decreases are based
on certain simplifying assumptions, including no changes in euro
currency exchange rates and an immediate
across-the-board
increase or decrease in the level of interest rates with no
other subsequent changes for the remainder of the period.
51
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The SECs Financial Reporting Release No. 60,
Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical
Accounting Policies (FRR 60), suggests
companies provide additional disclosure and commentary on those
accounting policies considered most critical. FRR 60 considers
an accounting policy to be critical if it is important to the
Companys financial condition and results of operations and
requires significant judgment and estimates on the part of
management in its application. The Companys estimates are
often based on complex judgments, probabilities and assumptions
that we believe to be reasonable, but that are inherently
uncertain and unpredictable. It is also possible that other
professionals, applying reasonable judgment to the same facts
and circumstances, could develop and support a range of
alternative estimated amounts. The Company believes that the
following list represents its critical accounting policies as
contemplated by FRR 60. For a discussion of all of the
Companys significant accounting policies, see Notes 3
and 4 to the accompanying audited consolidated financial
statements.
Sales
Allowances and Uncollectible Accounts
A significant area of judgment affecting reported revenue and
net income is estimating the portion of revenues and related
receivables that are not realizable. In particular, wholesale
revenue is reduced by estimates of returns, discounts,
end-of-season
markdown allowances and operational chargebacks. Retail revenue,
including
e-commerce
sales, also is reduced by estimates of returns.
In determining estimates of returns, discounts,
end-of-season
markdown allowances and operational chargebacks, management
analyzes historical trends, seasonal results, current economic
and market conditions and retailer performance. The Company
reviews and refines these estimates on a quarterly basis. The
Companys historical estimates of these costs have not
differed materially from actual results.
Similarly, management evaluates accounts receivables to
determine if they will ultimately be collected. In performing
this evaluation, significant judgments and estimates are
included, including an analysis of specific risks on a
customer-by-customer
basis for larger accounts and customers, and a receivables aging
analysis that determines the percentage of receivables that has
historically been uncollected by aged category. Based on this
information, management provides a reserve for the estimated
amounts believed to be uncollectible. Although management
believes that the Companys major customers are sound and
creditworthy, a severe adverse impact on their business
operations could have a corresponding material adverse effect on
the Companys net sales, cash flows
and/or
financial condition.
See Accounts Receivable under Note 3 to the
accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for an
analysis of the activity in the Companys reserves for
sales allowances and uncollectible accounts for each of the
three fiscal years presented.
Inventories
The Company holds inventory that is sold through wholesale
distribution channels to major department stores and specialty
retail stores, including its own retail stores. The Company also
holds retail inventory that is sold in its own stores directly
to consumers. Wholesale and retail inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or estimated realizable value. Cost for wholesale
inventories is determined using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method and cost for retail
inventories is determined on a moving-average cost basis.
The Company continually evaluates the composition of its
inventories, assessing slow-turning, ongoing product, as well as
all fashion product. Estimated realizable value of distressed
inventory is determined based on historical sales trends of the
Companys individual product lines for this category of
inventory, the impact of market trends and economic conditions,
and the value of current orders in-house relating to the future
sales of this category of inventory. Estimates may differ from
actual results due to quantity, quality and mix of products in
inventory, consumer and retailer preferences and market
conditions. The Companys historical estimates of these
costs and its provisions have not differed materially from
actual results.
52
Purchase
Accounting
The Company accounts for its business acquisitions under the
purchase method of accounting. As such, the total cost of
acquisitions is allocated to the underlying net assets based on
their respective estimated fair values. The excess of the
purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets
acquired is recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair value of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires
managements judgment and often involves the use of
significant estimates and assumptions, including assumptions
with respect to future cash inflows and outflows, discount
rates, asset lives and market multiples, among other items.
In addition, in connection with its recent business
acquisitions, the Company has settled certain pre-existing
relationships. These pre-existing relationships include
licensing agreements and litigation in the case of the
acquisition of the Polo Jeans Business. In accordance with the
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 04-1,
Accounting for Pre-existing Relationships between the
Parties to a Business Combination, the Company is required
to allocate the aggregate consideration exchanged in these
transactions between the value of the business acquired and the
value of the settlement of any pre-existing relationships in
proportion to estimates of their respective fair values. If the
terms of the pre-existing relationships were determined to not
be reflective of market, a settlement gain or loss would be
recognized in earnings. Accordingly, significant judgment is
required to determine the respective fair values of the business
acquired and the value of the settlement of the pre-existing
relationship. The Company has historically utilized independent
valuation firms to assist in the determination of fair value.
Impairment
of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets are accounted for in
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (FAS 142). Under
FAS 142, goodwill, including any goodwill included in the
carrying value of investments accounted for using the equity
method of accounting, and certain other intangible assets deemed
to have indefinite useful lives are not amortized. Rather,
goodwill and such indefinite-lived intangible assets are
assessed for impairment at least annually based on comparisons
of their respective fair values to their carrying values.
Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their
respective estimated useful lives and, along with other
long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment periodically
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their
related carrying amounts may not be recoverable in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (FAS 144).
In accordance with FAS 142, goodwill impairment is
determined using a two-step process. The first step of the
goodwill impairment test is to identify potential impairment by
comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its net book
value (or carrying amount), including goodwill. If the fair
value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill
of the reporting unit is considered not to be impaired and the
second step of the impairment test is unnecessary to be
performed. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds
its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test
is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the
implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill with
the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of
the reporting units goodwill exceeds the implied fair
value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an
amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill
is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill
recognized in a business combination. That is, the fair value of
the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and
liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible
assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business
combination and the fair value was the purchase price paid to
acquire the reporting unit.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit under the first
step of the goodwill impairment test and determining the fair
value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit
(including unrecognized intangible assets) under the second step
of the goodwill impairment test is judgmental in nature and
often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions.
Similarly, estimates and assumptions are used in determining the
fair value of other intangible assets. These estimates and
assumptions could have a significant impact on whether or not an
impairment charge is recognized and also the magnitude of any
such charge. To assist management in the process of determining
goodwill impairment, the Company obtains appraisals from
independent valuation firms. Estimates of fair value are
primarily determined using discounted cash flows, market
comparisons and recent transactions. These
53
approaches use significant estimates and assumptions, including
projected future cash flows (including timing), discount rates
reflecting the risks inherent in future cash flows, perpetual
growth rates and determination of appropriate market comparables.
The impairment test for other indefinite-lived intangible assets
consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible
asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the
indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
In addition, in evaluating finite-lived intangible assets for
recoverability, the Company uses its best estimate of future
cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and
eventual disposition in accordance with FAS 144. To the
extent the estimated future, undiscounted cash inflows
attributable to the asset, less estimated future, undiscounted
cash outflows, are less than the carrying amount, an impairment
loss is recognized in an amount equal to the difference.
There have been no impairment losses recorded in connection with
the assessment of the recoverability of goodwill and other
intangible assets during any of the three fiscal years presented.
Impairment
of Other Long-Lived Assets
Property and equipment, along with other long-lived assets, are
evaluated for impairment periodically whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that their related carrying amounts
may not be recoverable in accordance with FAS 144. In
evaluating long-lived assets for recoverability, the Company
uses its best estimate of future cash flows expected to result
from the use of the asset and eventual disposition. To the
extent that estimated future undiscounted net cash flows
attributable to the asset are less than the carrying amount, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the
difference between the carrying value of such asset and its fair
value. Assets to be disposed of and for which there is a
committed plan of disposal, whether through sale or abandonment,
are reported at the lower of carrying value or fair value less
costs to sell.
In determining future cash flows, the Company takes various
factors into account, including changes in merchandising
strategy, the impact of more experienced retail store managers,
the impact of increased local advertising and the emphasis on
retail store cost controls. Since the determination of future
cash flows is an estimate of future performance, there may be
future impairments in the event that future cash flows do not
meet expectations.
There have been no impairment losses recorded in Fiscal 2007. In
Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal 2005, the Company recognized impairment
charges on retail fixed assets in the amounts of approximately
$11 million and $2 million, respectively.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are provided using the asset and liability method
prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(FAS 109). Under this method, income taxes
(i.e., deferred tax assets and liabilities, taxes currently
payable/refunds receivable and tax expense) are recorded based
on amounts refundable or payable in the current year and include
the results of any difference between U.S. GAAP and tax
reporting. Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effect of any
net operating loss, capital loss and general business credit
carryforwards and the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for
financial statement and income tax purposes, as determined under
enacted tax laws and rates. The financial effect of changes in
tax laws or rates is accounted for in the period of enactment.
Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide
provision for income taxes. That is, in the ordinary course of a
global business, there are many transactions for which the
ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. It is the Companys
policy to establish reserves for taxes that may become payable
in future years as a result of an examination by tax
authorities. The Company establishes those reserves based upon
managements assessment of the exposure associated with
permanent tax differences and tax credits. However, the
development of reserves for these exposures requires judgments
about tax issues, potential outcomes and timing, and is a
subjective critical estimate. In addition, valuation allowances
are established when management determines that it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset
will not be realized. The net deferred tax assets assume
sufficient future earnings for their realization, as well as the
continued application of currently anticipated tax rates. If the
Company determines that a deferred tax asset will not be
realizable, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset will
54
result in a reduction of earnings at that time. Tax reserves and
valuation allowances are analyzed periodically and adjusted as
events occur, or circumstances change, that warrant adjustments
to those balances.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes An Interpretation of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109
(FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income tax positions. FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN 48 is a
two-step process. The Company first will be required to
determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position
will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any
related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical
merits of the position. A tax position that meets the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold will then
be measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in
the financial statements based upon the largest amount of
benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 is effective for
the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2008 (April 1,
2007). While the Company continues to analyze the effect from
adopting the provisions of FIN 48, it is currently
anticipated that a cumulative effect adjustment of up to
$85 million will be charged to retained earnings during the
first quarter of Fiscal 2008. This estimate is subject to change
as the Company completes its analysis.
Contingencies
The Company periodically is exposed to various contingencies in
the ordinary course of conducting its business, including
certain litigation, alleged information system security breach
matters, contractual disputes, employee relation matters,
various tax audits, and trademark and intellectual property
matters. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies
(FAS 5), the Company records a liability for
such contingencies to the extent that it concludes their
occurrence is probable and the related losses are estimable. In
addition, if it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable
settlement of a contingency could exceed the established
liability, the Company discloses the estimated impact on its
liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
Management considers many factors in making these assessments.
Because the ultimate resolution of contingencies is inherently
unpredictable, these assessments can involve a series of complex
judgments about future events including, but not limited to,
court rulings, negotiations between affected parties and
governmental actions. As a result, the accounting for loss
contingencies relies heavily on estimates and assumptions.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective April 2, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment (FAS 123R), using the modified
prospective application transition method. Under this transition
method, the compensation expense recognized in the consolidated
statement of operations beginning April 2, 2006 includes
compensation expense for (a) all stock-based payments
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of April 1, 2006,
based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the original provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, as amended by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure (FAS 123) and (b) all
stock-based payments granted subsequent to April 1, 2006
based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the provisions of FAS 123R.
Prior to April 2, 2006, the Company accounted for
stock-based compensation plans under the intrinsic value method
in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25), and adopted the
disclosure-only provisions of FAS 123. Under this standard,
the Company did not recognize compensation expense for the
issuance of stock options with an exercise price equal to or
greater than the market price at the date of grant. However, as
required, the Company disclosed, in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements, the pro forma expense impact
of the stock option grants as if the fair-value-based
recognition provisions of FAS 123 were applied.
Compensation expense was previously recognized for restricted
stock and restricted stock units. The effect of forfeitures on
restricted stock and restricted stock units was recognized when
such forfeitures occurred.
55
Stock
Options
Stock options are granted to employees and non-employee
directors with exercise prices equal to fair market value at the
date of grant. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted, which
requires the input of subjective assumptions. Certain key
assumptions involve estimating future uncertain events. The key
factors influencing the estimation process include the expected
term of the option, the expected stock price volatility factor,
the expected dividend yield and risk-free interest rate, among
others. Generally, once stock option values are determined,
current accounting practices do not permit them to be changed,
even if the estimates used are different from the actuals.
Determining the fair value of stock-based compensation at the
date of grant requires significant judgment by management,
including estimates of the above Black-Scholes assumptions. In
addition, judgment is required in estimating the number of
stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. If actual
results differ significantly from these estimates, if management
changes its assumptions for future stock-based award grants, or
if there are changes in market conditions, stock-based
compensation expense and the Companys results of
operations could be materially impacted.
Restricted
Stock and Restricted Stock Units
The Company grants restricted shares of Class A common
stock and service-based restricted stock units
(RSUs) to certain of its senior executives. In
addition, the Company grants performance-based RSUs to such
senior executives and other key executives, and certain other
employees of the Company. The fair values of restricted stock
shares and RSUs are based on the fair value of unrestricted
Class A common stock, as adjusted to reflect the absence of
dividends for those restricted securities that are not entitled
to dividend equivalents. Compensation expense for
performance-based RSUs is recognized over the related service
period when attainment of the performance goals is deemed
probable.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Refer to Note 4 to the accompanying audited consolidated
financial statements for a discussion of certain accounting
standards the Company is not yet required to adopt which may
impact its results of operations
and/or
financial condition in future reporting periods.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
For a discussion of the Companys exposure to market risk,
see Market Risk Management in Item 7 included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
See the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
appearing at the end of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
|
Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other
procedures of an issuer that are designed to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by the
issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time period specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation,
controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it
files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
56
accumulated and communicated to the issuers management,
including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
We have evaluated, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the fiscal
year covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the fiscal year end covered by
this annual report.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Managements Report of Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined
in Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report based on
the framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this
evaluation, management concluded that the Companys
internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of
the fiscal year end covered by this annual report.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007 was
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report,
which is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Changes in internal controls over financial reporting
|
Other than the remediation of the income tax accounting material
weakness described below, there were no changes during the
fourth quarter of Fiscal 2007 that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
Prior to March 31, 2007, our management had concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to
the material weakness in our internal control over financial
reporting with respect to income tax accounting. This control
deficiency, which management first determined to be a material
weakness under the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Boards Auditing Standard No. 2 in its Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2005, largely related to
inadequate internal tax resources for a sufficient period of
time, lack of formal training for tax personnel and inadequate
controls and procedures over the tax accounting process to
complete a comprehensive and timely review of the income tax
accounts and required tax footnote disclosures. We undertook
several remedial steps during the period covered by this report
as well as during the course of Fiscal 2006, as described below,
to enhance controls. As of the end of the period covered by this
report, we believe we have taken the necessary steps to
remediate the material weakness. Before concluding that the
material weakness was remediated, management implemented and
evaluated its new controls and procedures for income tax
accounting and determined that these procedures were operating
effectively for a sufficient period of time and subjected them
to appropriate tests in order to conclude that they are
operating effectively. Accordingly, management has concluded
that the material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting with respect to income tax accounting was
remediated as of March 31, 2007.
Remediation
of material weakness
During Fiscal 2006 and 2007, the following remedial steps were
taken to strengthen internal controls to address the material
weakness described above:
|
|
|
|
|
the upgrade and expansion of internal tax staff with appropriate
qualifications and training in accounting for income taxes;
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
instituting formal training of tax personnel;
|
|
|
|
reviewing income tax accounting processes and implementing
changes in order to strengthen the design and operation in
internal controls; and
|
|
|
|
developing and implementing policies to ensure that all
significant tax accounts are properly reconciled on a timely
basis and that all tax amounts reflected in our financial
statements are fairly presented and supported by underlying tax
calculations.
|
Management believes the aforementioned steps have resolved the
material weakness in controls described above for a period of
time sufficient to conclude that our controls over financial
reporting are now effective.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Information relating to our directors will be set forth in the
Companys proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting of
stockholders to be filed within 120 days after
March 31, 2007 (the Proxy Statement) and is
incorporated by reference herein. Information relating to our
executive officers is set forth in Item I of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
under the caption Executive Officers.
The Company has a Code of Ethics for Principal Executive
Officers and Senior Financial Officers that applies to our
principal executive officer, our principal operating officer,
our principal financial officer, our controller, and our
principal accounting officer. You can find our Code of Ethics
for Principal Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers
on our internet site, http://investor.polo.com. We will post any
amendments to the Code of Ethics for Principal Executive
Officers and Senior Financial Officers and any waivers that are
required to be disclosed by the rules of either the SEC or the
NYSE on our internet site.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Information relating to executive and director compensation will
be set forth in the Proxy Statement and such information is
incorporated by reference herein.
58
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information as of March 31,
2007
The following table sets forth information as of March 31,
2007 regarding compensation plans under which the Companys
equity securities are authorized for issuance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
Numbers of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Securities to be
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Issued upon
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding
|
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Securities Reflected in
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Options ($)
|
|
|
Column (a))
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by
security holders
|
|
|
8,838,197(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
32.79(2
|
)
|
|
|
5,906,320(3
|
)
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by
security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,838,197
|
|
|
$
|
32.79
|
|
|
|
5,906,320
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of 6,886,400 options to
purchase shares of our Class A Common Stock and 1,951,797
restricted stock units that are payable solely in shares of
Class A Common Stock. Does not include 105,000 outstanding
restricted shares that are subject to forfeiture.
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents the weighted average
exercise price of the outstanding stock options. No exercise
price is payable with respect to the outstanding restricted
stock units.
|
|
(3) |
|
All of the securities remaining
available for future issuance set forth in column (c) may
be in the form of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
stock, restricted stock units, performance awards or other
stock-based awards under the Companys Amended and Restated
1997 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. An additional 105,000
outstanding shares of restricted stock granted under the
Companys Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Stock
Incentive Plan that remain subject to forfeiture are not
reflected in column (c).
|
Other information relating to security ownership of certain
beneficial owners and management will be set forth in the Proxy
Statement and such information is incorporated by reference
herein.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required to be included by Item 13 of
Form 10-K
will be included in the Proxy Statement and such information is
incorporated by reference herein.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
The information required to be included by Item 14 of
Form 10-K
will be included in the Proxy Statement and such information is
incorporated by reference herein.
59
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) 1., 2. Financial Statements and Schedules. See index on
Page F-1.
3. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to
the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-24733)
(the
S-1))*
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of
the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the
S-1)*
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement
dated as of June 9, 1997 by and among Ralph Lauren, GS
Capital Partners, L.P., GS Capital Partner PRL Holding I,
L.P., GS Capital Partners PRL Holding II, L.P., Stone
Street Fund 1994, L.P., Stone Street 1994 Subsidiary Corp.,
Bridge Street Fund 1994, L.P., and Polo Ralph Lauren
Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
S-1)*
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
U.S.A. Design and Consulting
Agreement, dated January 1, 1985, between Ralph Lauren,
individually and d/b/a Ralph Lauren Design Studio, and Cosmair,
Inc., and letter Agreement related thereto dated January 1,
1985** (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
S-1)*
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Restated U.S.A. License Agreement,
dated January 1, 1985, between Ricky Lauren and Mark N.
Kaplan, as Licensor, and Cosmair, Inc., as Licensee, and letter
Agreement related thereto dated January 1, 1985** (filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to the
S-1)*
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Foreign Design and Consulting
Agreement, dated January 1, 1985, between Ralph Lauren,
individually and d/b/a Ralph Lauren Design Studio, as Licensor,
and LOreal S.A., as Licensee, and letter Agreements
related thereto dated January 1, 1985, September 16,
1994 and October 25, 1994** (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to
the S-1)*
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Restated Foreign License
Agreement, dated January 1, 1985, between The Polo/Lauren
Company, as Licensor, and LOreal S.A., as Licensee, Letter
Agreement related thereto dated January 1, 1985, and
Supplementary Agreement thereto, dated October 1, 1991**
(filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the
S-1)*
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Amendment, dated November 27,
1992, to Foreign Design and Consulting Agreement and Restated
Foreign License Agreement** (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the
S-1)*
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Agency Agreement dated
October 5, 2006, between Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and
Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch and Deutsche Bank Luxemburg
S.A., as fiscal and principal paying agent (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 30, 2006)*
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
between Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and its Directors and
Executive Officers (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the
S-1)*
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, effective as of July 23, 2002, between Polo
Ralph Lauren Corporation and Roger N. Farah (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2002)*
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2003, between Polo Ralph
Lauren Corporation and Ralph Lauren (filed as Exhibit 10.1
to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2003)*
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2004, between Polo Ralph
Lauren Corporation and Ralph Lauren (filed as Exhibit 10.14
to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2005 (the Fiscal
2006
10-K))*
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2004, between Polo Ralph
Lauren Corporation and Ralph Lauren (filed as Exhibit 10.15
to the Fiscal 2006
10-K)*
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan as Amended as of
August 14, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2003)*
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated
July 1, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement between Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and Roger N.
Farah (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended October 2, 2004)*
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2004, between Polo Ralph
Lauren Corporation and Roger N. Farah (filed as
Exhibit 10.18 to the Fiscal 2006
10-K)*
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement,
dated as of July 23, 2002, between Polo Ralph Lauren
Corporation and Roger N. Farah (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to
the Fiscal 2006
10-K)*
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2002, between Polo Ralph
Lauren Corporation and Roger N. Farah (filed as
Exhibit 10.20 to the Fiscal 2006
10-K)*
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Deferred Compensation Agreement,
dated as of September 19, 2002, between Polo Ralph Lauren
Corporation and Roger N. Farah (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to
the Fiscal 2006
10-K)*
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and
among Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, RL Childrenswear Company,
LLC and The Seller Affiliate Group (as defined therein) dated
March 25, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended July 3, 2004)*
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of
July 2, 2004, to Asset Purchase Agreement by and among
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, RL Childrenswear
Company, LLC and The Seller Affiliate Group (as defined therein)
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended July 3, 2004)*
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation 1997
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated as of
August 12, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the
Form 8-K
dated August 12, 2004)*
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Amendment, dated as of
June 30, 2006, to the Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation 1997
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated as of
August 12, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2006)*
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Cliff Restricted Performance Share
Unit Award Overview containing the standard terms of restricted
performance share awards under the Stock Incentive Plan (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2006)*
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Pro-Rata Restricted Performance
Share Unit Award Overview containing the standard terms of
restriction performance share awards under the Stock Incentive
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2006)*
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Stock Option Award
Overview U.S. containing the standard terms of
stock option award under the Stock Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2006)*
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of
November 28, 2006, by and among the Company, JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, The Bank of New York,
Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A. and Wachovia Bank National
Association, as Syndication Agents, J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc., as Sole Bookrunner and Sole Lead Arranger, and a Syndicate
of Lending Banks (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 30, 2006)*
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of
September 4, 2004, between Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
and Jackwyn Nemerov (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended October 2, 2004)*
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of
March 26, 2007, between Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and
Tracey T. Travis
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as
of April 3, 2005, between Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and
Mitchell A. Kosh (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended July 2, 2005)*
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Cross Default and Term Extension
Agreement, dated May 11, 1998, among PRL USA, Inc., The
Polo/Lauren Company, L.P., Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, Jones
Apparel Group, Inc. and Jones Investment Co., Inc. (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 28, 2002)*
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Amended and Restated Polo Ralph
Lauren Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005)*
|
|
14
|
.1
|
|
Code of Ethics for Principal
Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers (filed as
Exhibit 14.1 to the Fiscal 2003
Form 10-K)*
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries
of the Company
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Deloitte &
Touche LLP
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Ralph Lauren
required by 17 CFR
240.13a-14(a)
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Tracey T. Travis
required by 17 CFR
240.13a-14(a)
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Ralph Lauren
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Tracey T. Travis
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that Section. Such exhibits shall not be deemed
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
*
|
|
Incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contract or compensatory
plan or arrangement.
|
|
**
|
|
Portions of
Exhibits 10.3-10.9
have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential
treatment and have been filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
|
62
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d)
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on May 30, 2007.
POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
Tracey T. Travis
Senior Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ RALPH
LAUREN
Ralph
Lauren
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROGER
N. FARAH
Roger
N. Farah
|
|
President, Chief Operating
Officer
and Director
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ TRACEY
T. TRAVIS
Tracey
T. Travis
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ARNOLD
H. ARONSON
Arnold
H. Aronson
|
|
Director
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN
R. ALCHIN
John
R. Alchin
|
|
Director
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ FRANK
A.
BENNACK, JR.
Frank
A. Bennack, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DR.
JOYCE F.
BROWN
Dr.
Joyce F. Brown
|
|
Director
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOEL
L.
FLEISHMAN
Joel
L. Fleishman
|
|
Director
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JUDITH
A. MCHALE
Judith
A. McHale
|
|
Director
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ STEVEN
P. MURPHY
Steven
P. Murphy
|
|
Director
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ JACKWYN
L. NEMEROV
Jackwyn
L. Nemerov
|
|
Director
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ TERRY
S. SEMEL
Terry
S. Semel
|
|
Director
|
|
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
64
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
|
|
Supplementary Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
|
|
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in the consolidated financial
statements or notes thereto.
F-1
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
563.9
|
|
|
$
|
285.7
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowances of $138.1 and $115.0 million
|
|
|
467.5
|
|
|
|
484.2
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
526.9
|
|
|
|
485.5
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
83.2
|
|
|
|
90.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,685.9
|
|
|
|
1,378.5
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
629.8
|
|
|
|
548.8
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
790.5
|
|
|
|
699.7
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
297.7
|
|
|
|
258.5
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
297.2
|
|
|
|
203.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,758.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,088.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
174.7
|
|
|
$
|
202.2
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
46.6
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
391.0
|
|
|
|
314.3
|
|
Current maturities of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
640.3
|
|
|
|
843.5
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
398.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
384.0
|
|
|
|
174.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,423.1
|
|
|
|
1,039.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, par
value $.01 per share; 68.6 million and
66.4 million shares issued; 60.7 million and
62.1 million shares outstanding
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Class B common stock, par
value $.01 per share; 43.3 million shares issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
872.5
|
|
|
|
783.6
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,742.3
|
|
|
|
1,379.2
|
|
Treasury stock, Class A, at
cost (7.9 million and 4.3 million shares)
|
|
|
(321.5
|
)
|
|
|
(87.1
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders
equity
|
|
|
2,334.9
|
|
|
|
2,049.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,758.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,088.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-2
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
4,059.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,501.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,060.7
|
|
Licensing revenue
|
|
|
236.3
|
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
|
|
244.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
4,295.4
|
|
|
|
3,746.3
|
|
|
|
3,305.4
|
|
Cost of goods
sold(a)
|
|
|
(1,959.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,723.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1,620.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,336.2
|
|
|
|
2,022.4
|
|
|
|
1,684.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses(a)
|
|
|
(1,663.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1,476.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1,377.6
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Impairments of retail assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other costs and
expenses
|
|
|
(1,683.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,384.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
652.6
|
|
|
|
516.6
|
|
|
|
299.7
|
|
Foreign currency gains (losses)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Equity in income of equity-method
investees
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Minority interest expense
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
643.3
|
|
|
|
502.9
|
|
|
|
297.8
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(242.4
|
)
|
|
|
(194.9
|
)
|
|
|
(107.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
400.9
|
|
|
$
|
308.0
|
|
|
$
|
190.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
3.84
|
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
3.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
104.4
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
101.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
107.6
|
|
|
|
107.2
|
|
|
|
104.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
Includes total
depreciation expense of:
|
|
$
|
(129.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(117.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(98.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-3
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
400.9
|
|
|
$
|
308.0
|
|
|
$
|
190.4
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense
|
|
|
144.7
|
|
|
|
127.0
|
|
|
|
102.1
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
(benefit)
|
|
|
(112.4
|
)
|
|
|
35.6
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Minority interest expense
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Equity in the income of
equity-method investees, net of dividends received
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
Non-cash stock compensation expense
|
|
|
43.6
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
Non-cash impairments of retail
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Non-cash Jones-related Litigation
charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Non-cash provision for bad debt
expense
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and
equipment
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
Non-cash foreign currency losses
(gains)
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
Non-cash restructuring charges
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
(19.2
|
)
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(32.2
|
)
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
(44.5
|
)
|
Deferred income liabilities,
primarily proceeds received from Luxottica in Fiscal 2007
(Note 22)
|
|
|
202.6
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Settlement of Jones-related
Litigation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other balance sheet changes
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
796.1
|
|
|
|
449.1
|
|
|
|
382.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
and purchase price settlements
|
|
|
(176.1
|
)
|
|
|
(380.6
|
)
|
|
|
(243.3
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(184.0
|
)
|
|
|
(158.6
|
)
|
|
|
(174.1
|
)
|
Cash deposits restricted in
connection with taxes (Note 3)
|
|
|
(74.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(434.6
|
)
|
|
|
(539.2
|
)
|
|
|
(417.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
380.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(291.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of capital lease
obligations
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of dividends
|
|
|
(20.9
|
)
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
Distributions to minority interest
holders
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(231.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
Termination of interest rate swap
agreements
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation arrangements
|
|
|
33.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
(95.2
|
)
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
278.2
|
|
|
|
(64.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
285.7
|
|
|
|
350.5
|
|
|
|
352.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of period
|
|
$
|
563.9
|
|
|
$
|
285.7
|
|
|
$
|
350.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-4
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
at cost
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Balance at April 3,
2004
|
|
|
104.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
563.5
|
|
|
$
|
921.6
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
(79.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
23.1
|
|
|
$
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,415.5
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized losses
on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197.2
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Shares issued and equity grants
made pursuant to stock compensation
plans(a)
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.1
|
)
|
|
|
85.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 2,
2005
|
|
|
107.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
664.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,090.3
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
(80.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
29.9
|
|
|
$
|
(29.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,675.7
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized losses
on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293.6
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
Shares issued and equity grants
made pursuant to stock compensation
plans(a)
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
103.2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1,
2006
|
|
|
109.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
783.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,379.2
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
(87.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
|
$
|
(42.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,049.6
|
|
Cumulative effect of adopting
SAB 108(b)
(Note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of adopting
FAS 123R (Note 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized losses
on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425.9
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.9
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(231.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231.3
|
)
|
Shares issued and equity grants
made pursuant to stock compensation
plans(a)
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
2007
|
|
|
111.9
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
872.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,742.3
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
$
|
(321.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,334.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes income tax benefits
relating to the exercise of employee stock options of
approximately $33 million in Fiscal 2007, $22 million
in Fiscal 2006 and $19 million in Fiscal 2005.
|
|
(b) |
|
Net of $3.6 million tax effect.
|
See accompanying notes.
F-5
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business
|
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation (PRLC) is a global
leader in the design, marketing and distribution of premium
lifestyle products, including mens, womens and
childrens apparel, accessories, fragrances and home
furnishings. PRLCs long-standing reputation and
distinctive image have been consistently developed across an
expanding number of products, brands and international markets.
PRLCs brand names include Polo, Polo by
Ralph Lauren, Ralph Lauren Purple Label, Ralph Lauren Black
Label, RLX, Ralph Lauren Blue Label, Lauren, RRL, Rugby, Chaps,
Club Monaco, and American Living, among others. PRLC
and its subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as the
Company, we, us,
our and ourselves, unless the context
indicates otherwise.
The Company classifies its businesses into three segments:
Wholesale, Retail and Licensing. The Companys wholesale
sales are made principally to major department and specialty
stores located throughout the U.S. and Europe. The Company also
sells directly to consumers through full-price and factory
retail stores located throughout the U.S., Canada, Europe, South
America and Asia, and through its retail internet site located
at www.Polo.com. In addition, the Company often licenses the
right to third parties to use its various trademarks in
connection with the manufacture and sale of designated products,
such as apparel, eyewear and fragrances, in specified
geographical areas for specified periods.
Basis
of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements present the
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company and all entities in which the Company has a controlling
voting interest. The accompanying consolidated financial
statements also include the accounts of any variable interest
entities in which the Company is considered to be the primary
beneficiary and such entities are required to be consolidated in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
U.S. (US GAAP). In particular, pursuant to the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46R
(FIN 46R), the Company consolidates Polo Ralph
Lauren Japan Corporation (PRL Japan), a 50%-owned
venture with Onward Kashiyama Co. Ltd and its subsidiaries
(Onward Kashiyama) and The Seibu Department Stores,
Ltd (Seibu). Prior to the acquisition of the
minority ownership interests in Ralph Lauren Media, LLC
(RL Media) on March 28, 2007, the Company also
consolidated RL Media, formerly a 50%-owned venture with NBC
Universal, Inc. (NBC) and Value Vision
International, Inc. and its related entities (Value
Vision), pursuant to FIN 46R. RL Media conducts the
Companys
e-commerce
initiatives through an internet site known as Polo.com. See
Note 5 for further discussion of the Companys
acquisition of the remaining 50% ownership interest of RL Media,
as well as the Companys acquisition of the remaining 50%
ownership interest of PRL Japan in May 2007.
All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Fiscal
Year
The Company utilizes a
52-53 week
fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to March 31. As
such, Fiscal year 2007 ended on March 31, 2007 and
reflected a
52-week
period (Fiscal 2007); Fiscal year 2006 ended on
April 1, 2006 and reflected a
52-week
period (Fiscal 2006); and Fiscal year 2005 ended on
April 2, 2005 and reflected a
52-week
period (Fiscal 2005).
The financial position and operating results of the
Companys consolidated 50% interest in PRL Japan are
reported on a one-month lag. Similarly, prior to the fourth
quarter of Fiscal 2006, the financial position and operating
results of RL Media were reported on a three-month lag. During
the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2006, RL Media changed its fiscal
year, which was formerly on a calendar-year basis, to conform
with the Companys fiscal-year basis. In connection with
this change, the three-month reporting lag for RL Media was
eliminated. Accordingly, the Companys operating results
for Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006 included in this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for Fiscal 2007 (the Fiscal 2007
10-K)
include the operating results of RL Media for the twelve-month
periods
F-6
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
ended March 31, 2007 and April 1, 2006, respectively,
whereas Fiscal 2005 includes the operating results of RL Media
for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2004. The
net effect from this change in RL Medias fiscal year was
not material to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements for Fiscal 2006 and was reflected in retained
earnings as a component of stockholders equity.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
footnotes thereto. Actual results could differ materially from
those estimates.
Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the
accompanying consolidated financial statements include reserves
for customer returns, discounts,
end-of-season
markdown allowances and operational chargebacks; reserves for
the realizability of inventory; reserves for litigation and
other contingencies; impairments of long-lived tangible and
intangible assets; depreciation and amortization expense;
accounting for income taxes and related contingencies; the
valuation of stock-based compensation and related forfeiture
rates; and accounting for business combinations under the
purchase method of accounting.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior
periods financial information in order to conform to the
current periods presentation.
|
|
3.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized across all segments of the business when
there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has
occurred, price has been fixed or is determinable, and
collectibility can be reasonably assured.
Revenue within the Companys Wholesale segment is
recognized at the time title passes and risk of loss is
transferred to customers. Wholesale revenue is recorded net of
estimates of returns, discounts,
end-of-season
markdown allowances, certain cooperative advertising allowances
and operational chargebacks. Returns and allowances require
pre-approval from management and discounts are based on trade
terms. Estimates for
end-of-season
markdown allowances are based on historical trends, seasonal
results, an evaluation of current economic and market
conditions, and retailer performance. The Company reviews and
refines these estimates on a quarterly basis. The Companys
historical estimates of these costs have not differed materially
from actual results.
Retail store revenue is recognized net of estimated returns at
the time of sale to consumers.
E-commerce
revenue from sales of products ordered through the
Companys retail internet site known as Polo.com is
recognized upon delivery and receipt of the shipment by its
customers. Such revenue also is reduced by an estimate of
returns.
Revenue from licensing arrangements is recognized when earned in
accordance with the terms of the underlying agreements,
generally based upon the higher of (a) contractually
guaranteed minimum royalty levels and (b) estimates of
sales and royalty data received from the Companys
licensees.
Sales
Taxes
In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
reached a consensus on EITF Issue
No. 06-03,
How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to
Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income
Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation)
(EITF
06-03).
EITF 06-03
provides that the presentation of taxes assessed by a
governmental authority that are directly imposed on
revenue-related transactions between sellers and customers on
either a gross or net basis is an accounting policy decision
that should be disclosed. The
F-7
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company accounts for sales and other related taxes on a net
basis, excluding such taxes from revenue and cost of revenue.
Cost
of Goods Sold and Selling Expenses
Cost of goods sold includes the expenses incurred to acquire and
produce inventory for sale, including product costs, freight-in,
and import costs, as well as changes in reserves for shrinkage
and inventory obsolescence. The costs of selling merchandise,
including preparing the merchandise for sale, such as picking,
packing, warehousing and order charges, are included in selling,
general and administrative (SG&A) expenses.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
The costs associated with shipping goods to customers are
reflected as a component of SG&A expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Shipping and
handling costs incurred approximated $92 million in Fiscal
2007, $77 million in Fiscal 2006 and $56 million in
Fiscal 2005. Shipping and handling charges billed to customers
are included in revenues.
Advertising
Costs
In accordance with American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position
(SOP)
No. 93-7,
Reporting on Advertising Costs, advertising costs,
including the costs to produce advertising, are expensed when
the advertisement is first exhibited. In accordance with EITF
Issue
No. 01-09,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a
Customer or a Reseller of the Vendors Products,
costs of
out-of-store
advertising paid to wholesale customers under cooperative
advertising programs are expensed as an advertising cost if both
the identified advertising benefit is sufficiently separable
from the purchase of the Companys products by customers
and the fair value of such benefit is measurable. Otherwise,
such costs are reflected as a reduction of revenue. Costs of
in-store advertising paid to wholesale customers under
cooperative advertising programs are not included in advertising
costs, but are reflected as a reduction of revenues since the
benefits are not sufficiently separable from the purchases of
the Companys products by customers.
Advertising expense amounted to approximately $181 million
for Fiscal 2007, $166 million for Fiscal 2006 and
$127 million for Fiscal 2005. Deferred advertising costs,
which principally relate to advertisements that have not yet
been exhibited or services that have not yet been received, were
approximately $3 million and $4 million at the end of
Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006, respectively.
Foreign
Currency Translation and Transactions
The financial position and operating results of foreign
operations are primarily consolidated using the local currency
as the functional currency. Local currency assets and
liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange on the
balance sheet date, and local currency revenue and expenses are
translated at average rates of exchange during the period.
Resulting translation gains or losses are included in the
accompanying consolidated statement of stockholders equity
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Gains and losses on translation of intercompany loans with
foreign subsidiaries of a long-term investment nature also are
included within this component of stockholders equity.
The Company also recognizes gains and losses on transactions
that are denominated in a currency other than the respective
entitys functional currency. Foreign currency transaction
gains and losses also include amounts realized on the settlement
of intercompany loans with foreign subsidiaries that are either
short-term, or were previously of a long-term, investment nature
and deferred as a component of stockholders equity.
Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in
earnings and separately disclosed in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
F-8
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss), which is reported in the
accompanying consolidated statement of stockholders
equity, consists of net income (loss) and other gains and losses
affecting equity that, under US GAAP, are excluded from net
income (loss). The components of other comprehensive income
(loss) for the Company primarily consist of foreign currency
translation gains and losses and deferred gains and losses on
hedging instruments, such as foreign currency exchange contracts
designated as cash flow hedges and changes in the fair value of
the Companys Euro-denominated debt designated as a hedge
of changes in the fair value of the Companys net
investment in certain of its European subsidiaries.
Net
Income Per Common Share
Net income per common share is determined in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128,
Earnings per Share (FAS 128). Under
the provisions of FAS 128, basic net income per common
share is computed by dividing the net income applicable to
common shares after preferred dividend requirements, if any, by
the weighted average of common shares outstanding during the
period. Weighted-average common shares include shares of the
Companys Class A and Class B common stock.
Diluted net income per common share adjusts basic net income per
common share for the effects of outstanding stock options,
restricted stock, restricted stock units and any other
potentially dilutive financial instruments, only in the periods
in which such effect is dilutive under the treasury stock method.
The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used to
calculate basic net income per common share is reconciled to
those shares used in calculating diluted net income per common
share as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
104.4
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
101.5
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options,
restricted stock and restricted stock units
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares
|
|
|
107.6
|
|
|
|
107.2
|
|
|
|
104.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price
greater than the average market price of the common stock are
anti-dilutive and therefore not included in the computation of
diluted net income per common share. In addition, the Company
has outstanding performance-based restricted stock units that
are issuable only upon the satisfaction of certain performance
goals. Such units only are included in the computation of
diluted shares to the extent the underlying performance
conditions (a) are satisfied prior to the end of the
reporting period or (b) would be satisfied if the end of
the reporting period were the end of the related contingency
period and the result would be dilutive. As of the end of Fiscal
2007 and Fiscal 2006, there was an aggregate of approximately
1.0 million and 0.8 million, respectively, of
additional shares issuable upon the exercise of anti-dilutive
options
and/or the
contingent vesting of performance-based restricted stock units
that were excluded from the diluted share calculations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective April 2, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment (FAS 123R). This statement
requires all share-based payments to employees to be expensed
based on the grant date fair value of the awards over the
requisite service period. The Company applied the requirements
of FAS 123R using the modified prospective method and,
therefore, prior periods were not restated. Under the modified
prospective method, the Company records compensation expense for
(1) the unvested portion of previously issued awards that
remained outstanding at the initial date of adoption and
(2) for any awards issued,
F-9
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
modified or settled after the effective date of the statement.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation method to determine
the grant date fair value of its stock option awards.
Prior to the adoption of FAS 123R, the Companys
stock-based compensation was recognized using the intrinsic
value method, which measures stock-based compensation expense as
the amount at which the market price of the stock at the date of
grant exceeds the exercise price. Accordingly, no compensation
expense was recognized for the Companys stock option
awards. Prior to the adoption of FAS 123R, the
Companys stock-based compensation expense consisted of
restricted stock and service-based restricted stock unit and
performance-based restricted stock unit awards, which were
accounted for in accordance with Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees (APB No. 25).
See Note 18 for further discussion of the Companys
stock-based compensation and the adoption of FAS 123R.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments
with original maturities of three months or less, including
investments in debt securities. Investments in debt securities
are diversified among high-credit quality securities in
accordance with the Companys risk-management policies, and
primarily include commercial paper and money market funds.
Restricted
Cash
The Company has placed 58.9 million
($77.2 million) of cash in escrow with certain banks,
primarily in Fiscal 2007, as collateral to secure guarantees of
a corresponding amount made by the banks to certain
international tax authorities on behalf of the Company. Of the
58.9 million of cash in escrow,
41.3 million ($55.1 million) was placed as
collateral to secure guarantees made to the French tax
authorities for the payment of an asserted excess royalties tax
matter and 17.6 million ($22.1 million) was
placed as collateral to secure refunds of value-added tax
payments in certain international tax jurisdictions. Such cash
has been classified as restricted cash and reported as a
component of other assets in the Companys consolidated
balance sheet. See Note 15 for further discussion of the
French tax matter.
Accounts
Receivable
In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit to
customers that satisfy defined credit criteria. Accounts
receivable, net, as shown in the Companys consolidated
balance sheet, is net of certain reserves and allowances. These
reserves and allowances consist of (a) reserves for
returns, discounts,
end-of-season
markdown allowances and operational chargebacks and
(b) allowances for doubtful accounts. These reserves and
allowances are discussed in further detail below.
A reserve for trade discounts is determined based on open
invoices where trade discounts have been extended to customers,
and is treated as a reduction of revenue.
Estimated
end-of-season
markdown allowances are included as a reduction of revenue.
These provisions are based on retail sales performance, seasonal
negotiations with customers, historical deduction trends and an
evaluation of current market conditions.
A reserve for operational chargebacks represents various
deductions by customers relating to individual shipments. This
reserve, net of expected recoveries, is included as a reduction
of revenue. The reserve is based on chargebacks received as of
the date of the financial statements and past experience. Costs
associated with potential returns of products also are included
as a reduction of revenues. These return reserves are based on
current information regarding retail performance, historical
experience and an evaluation of current market conditions. The
Companys historical estimates of these operational
chargeback and return costs have not differed materially from
actual results.
F-10
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A rollforward of the activity in the Companys reserves for
returns, discounts,
end-of-season
markdown allowances and operational chargebacks is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Beginning reserve balance
|
|
$
|
107.5
|
|
|
$
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
90.3
|
|
Amounts charged against revenue to
increase reserve
|
|
|
388.4
|
|
|
|
302.6
|
|
|
|
265.3
|
|
Amounts credited against customer
accounts to decrease reserve
|
|
|
(369.2
|
)
|
|
|
(294.1
|
)
|
|
|
(256.7
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending reserve balance
|
|
$
|
129.4
|
|
|
$
|
107.5
|
|
|
$
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through
analysis of periodic aging of accounts receivable, assessments
of collectibility based on an evaluation of historic and
anticipated trends, the financial condition of the
Companys customers, and an evaluation of the impact of
economic conditions. A rollforward of the activity in the
Companys allowances for doubtful accounts is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Beginning reserve balance
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
Amount charged to expense to
increase reserve
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Amount written off against
customer accounts to decrease reserve
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending reserve balance
|
|
$
|
8.7
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
In the wholesale business, the Company has two key
department-store customers that generate significant sales
volume. For Fiscal 2007, these two customers contributed
approximately 29% and 14% of all wholesale revenues and 43% in
the aggregate.
Inventories
The Company holds inventory that is sold through wholesale
distribution channels to major department stores and specialty
retail stores, including its own retail stores. The Company also
holds retail inventory that is sold in its own stores directly
to consumers. Wholesale and retail inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or estimated realizable value. Cost for wholesale
inventories is determined using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method and cost for retail
inventories is determined on a moving-average cost basis.
The Company continually evaluates the composition of its
inventories, assessing slow-turning, ongoing (specially made for
Retail) product, as well as all fashion product. Estimated
realizable value of distressed inventory is determined based on
historical sales trends of the Companys individual product
lines for this category of inventory, the impact of market
trends and economic conditions, and the value of current orders
in-house relating to the future sales of this category of
inventory. Estimates may differ from actual results due to
quantity, quality and mix of products in inventory, consumer and
retailer preferences and market conditions. The Companys
historical estimates of these costs and its provisions have not
differed materially from actual results.
F-11
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Investments
Investments in companies in which the Company has significant
influence, but less than a controlling voting interest, are
accounted for using the equity method. This is generally
presumed to exist when the Company owns between 20% and 50% of
the investee. However, as a matter of policy, if the Company had
a greater than 50% ownership interest in an investee and the
minority shareholders held certain rights that allowed them to
participate in the
day-to-day
operations of the business, the Company would also use the
equity method of accounting.
Under the equity method, only the Companys investment in
and amounts due to and from the equity investee are included in
the consolidated balance sheets; only the Companys share
of the investees earnings (losses) is included in the
consolidated operating results; and only the dividends, cash
distributions, loans or other cash received from the investee
and additional cash investments, loan repayments or other cash
paid to the investee are included in the consolidated cash flows.
Investments in companies in which the Company does not have a
controlling interest, or is unable to exert significant
influence, are accounted for at market value if the investments
are publicly traded and there are no resale restrictions greater
than one year
(available-for-sale
investments). If resale restrictions greater than one year
exist, or if the investment is not publicly traded, the
investment is accounted for at cost.
As of March 31, 2007, the Companys only significant
investment is an approximate 20% equity interest in Impact 21
Co., Ltd. (Impact 21). Impact 21 is a public company
that holds the sublicenses for the Companys mens,
womens and jeans businesses in Japan. The Company accounts
for its interest in Impact 21, which is included in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, using
the equity method of accounting. See Note 5 for further
discussion of the Companys Japanese Business Acquisitions
that occurred in May 2007.
In addition, see Note 5 for a discussion of the
Companys formation of a joint venture in April 2007 to
conduct its watch and jewelry business, which will be accounted
for under the equity method of accounting.
Property
and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net, is stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line
method based upon the estimated useful lives of depreciable
assets, which range from three to seven years for furniture,
fixtures, computer systems and equipment; from three to ten
years for machinery and equipment; and from ten to forty years
for buildings and building improvements. Leasehold improvements
are depreciated over periods equal to the shorter of the
estimated useful lives of the respective assets and the life of
the lease.
Property and equipment, along with other long-lived assets, are
evaluated for impairment periodically whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that their related carrying amounts
may not be recoverable in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(FAS 144). In evaluating long-lived assets for
recoverability, including finite-lived intangibles as described
below, the Company uses its best estimate of future cash flows
expected to result from the use of the asset and eventual
disposition. To the extent that estimated future undiscounted
net cash flows attributable to the asset are less than the
carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to the difference between the carrying value of such asset
and its fair value. Assets to be disposed of and for which there
is a committed plan of disposal, whether through sale or
abandonment, are reported at the lower of carrying value or fair
value less costs to sell.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets are accounted for in
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (FAS 142). At
acquisition, the Company estimates and records the fair value of
purchased intangible assets, which primarily consists of license
F-12
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
agreements, customer relationships, non-compete agreements and
order backlog. The fair value of these intangible assets is
estimated based on managements assessment, as well as
independent third party appraisals, when necessary. The excess
of the purchase consideration over the fair value of net assets
acquired is recorded as goodwill. Under FAS 142, goodwill,
including any goodwill included in the carrying value of
investments accounted for using the equity method of accounting,
and certain other intangible assets deemed to have indefinite
useful lives are not amortized. Rather, goodwill and such
indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed for impairment
at least annually based on comparisons of their respective fair
values to their carrying values. Finite-lived intangible assets
are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and,
along with other long-lived assets as noted above, are evaluated
for impairment periodically whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that their related carrying amounts may
not be recoverable in accordance with FAS 144. See
discussion of the Companys accounting policy for
impairment as described earlier under the caption
Property and Equipment, Net.
Officers
Life Insurance
The Company maintains several whole-life and a few split-dollar
life insurance policies for certain of its senior executives.
Whole-life policies are recorded at their cash-surrender value,
and split-dollar policies are recorded at the lesser of their
cash-surrender value or aggregate premiums
paid-to-date
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of the end
of Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006, amounts of $53 million and
$52 million, respectively, relating to officers life
insurance policies held by the Company were classified within
other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are provided using the asset and liability method
prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(FAS 109). Under this method, income taxes
(i.e., deferred tax assets and liabilities, taxes currently
payable/refunds receivable and tax expense) are recorded based
on amounts refundable or payable in the current year and include
the results of any difference between US GAAP and tax reporting.
Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effect of certain net
operating loss, capital loss and general business credit
carryforwards and the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for
financial statement and income tax purposes, as determined under
enacted tax laws and rates. The financial effect of changes in
tax laws or rates is accounted for in the period of enactment.
Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide
provision for income taxes. That is, in the ordinary course of a
global business, there are many transactions for which the
ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. It is the Companys
policy to establish reserves for taxes that may become payable
in future years as a result of an examination by tax
authorities. The Company establishes those reserves based upon
managements assessment of the exposure associated with
permanent tax differences and tax credits. In addition,
valuation allowances are established when management determines
that it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of a
deferred tax asset will not be realized. Tax reserves and
valuation allowances are analyzed periodically and adjusted as
events occur, or circumstances change, that warrant adjustments
to those balances.
In addition, see Note 4 for the Companys discussion
of the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes.
Leases
The Company leases certain facilities and equipment, including
its retail stores. Such leasing arrangements are accounted for
under the provisions of FAS No. 13, Accounting
for Leases and other related authoritative accounting
literature (FAS 13). Certain of the
Companys leases contain renewal options, rent escalation
clauses
and/or
landlord incentives. Rent expense for noncancelable operating
leases with scheduled rent increases
and/or
landlord incentives is recognized on a straight-line basis over
the lease term, beginning with the effective lease commencement
date. The excess of straight-line rent expense over scheduled
payment amounts and landlord
F-13
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
incentives is recorded as a deferred rent liability. As of the
end of Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006, unamortized deferred rent
obligations of approximately $96 million and
$85 million, respectively, were classified within other
non-current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
For leases in which the Company is involved with the
construction of the building (generally on land owned by the
landlord), the Company accounts for the lease during the
construction period under the provisions of EITF
No. 97-10,
The Effect of Lessee Involvement in Asset
Construction
(EITF 97-10).
If the Company concludes that it has substantively all of the
risks of ownership during construction of a leased property and,
therefore, is deemed the owner of the project for accounting
purposes, it records an asset and related financing obligation
for the amount of total project costs related to
construction-in-progress
and the pre-existing building. Once construction is complete,
the Company considers the requirements under
FAS No. 98, Accounting for Leases:
Sale-Leaseback Transactions Involving Real Estate, Sales-Type
Leases of Real Estate, Definition of Lease Term, and Initial
Direct Costs of Direct Financing Leases, for
sale-leaseback treatment. If the arrangement does not qualify
for sale-leaseback treatment, the Company continues to amortize
the financing obligation and depreciate the building over the
lease term.
Derivatives
and Financial Instruments
The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, and subsequent amendments (collectively,
FAS 133). FAS 133 requires that all
derivative instruments be recognized on the balance sheet at
fair value. In addition, FAS 133 provides that, for
derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting, the
effective portion of changes in the fair value are either
(a) offset against the changes in fair value of the hedged
assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or
(b) recognized in stockholders equity until the
hedged item is recognized in earnings, depending on whether the
derivative is being used to hedge changes in fair value or cash
flows, respectively. For each derivative instrument entered into
where the Company seeks to obtain hedge accounting treatment,
the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged
item, as well as the related risk management objective and how
the effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be
assessed, is formally documented. The ineffective portion of a
derivatives change in fair value is immediately recognized
in earnings.
For cash flow reporting purposes, the Company classifies
proceeds received or paid upon the settlement of a derivative
financial instrument in the same manner as the item being hedged.
The carrying value of the Companys financial instruments
approximates fair value, except for certain differences relating
to fixed-rate debt, investments in other entities accounted for
using the equity method of accounting and other financial
instruments. However, other than differences in the fair value
of fixed-rate debt as disclosed in Note 13, these
differences were not significant as of March 31, 2007 and
April 1, 2006. The fair value of financial instruments
generally is determined by reference to market values resulting
from the trading of the instruments on a national securities
exchange or an
over-the-counter
market. In cases where quoted market prices are not available,
fair value is based on estimates derived through the use of
present value or other valuation techniques.
|
|
4.
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
|
Financial
Statement Misstatements
In September 2006, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) staff issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). SAB 108 was issued in order to
eliminate the diversity in practice surrounding how public
companies quantify and evaluate financial statement
misstatements.
Traditionally, there have been two widely-recognized methods for
quantifying and evaluating the effects of financial statement
misstatements: (i) the balance sheet (iron
curtain) method and (ii) the income statement
F-14
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(rollover) method. The iron curtain method
quantifies a misstatement based on the effects of correcting the
misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the
reporting period. The rollover method quantifies a misstatement
based on the amount of the error originating in the current
period income statement, including the reversing effect of prior
year misstatements. The use of the rollover method can lead to
the accumulation of misstatements in the balance sheet. Prior to
the adoption of SAB 108, the Company historically used the
rollover method for quantifying and evaluating identified
financial statement misstatements.
By issuing SAB 108, the SEC staff established an approach
that requires quantification and evaluation of financial
statement misstatements based on the effects of the
misstatements under both the iron curtain and rollover methods.
This model is commonly referred to as a dual
approach.
SAB 108 requires companies to initially apply its
provisions either by (i) restating prior financial
statements as if the dual approach had always been
applied or (ii) recording the cumulative effect of
initially applying the dual approach as adjustments
to the carrying values of assets and liabilities as of the
beginning of the current fiscal year, with an offsetting
adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings.
The Company elected to record the effects of applying
SAB 108 using the cumulative effect transition method and,
as such, recorded a $16.9 million reduction in retained
earnings as of April 2, 2006. The following table
summarizes the effects of applying SAB 108 for each period
in which the identified misstatement originated through
April 2, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period in which Misstatement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
Recorded as of
|
|
|
|
April 4,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Inventory(b)
|
|
$
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9.3
|
)
|
Other non-current
liabilities accrued
rent(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
Other non-current
assets equity method
investments(d)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
Other non-current
liabilities minority
interest(d)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Deferred income
taxes(e)
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on net income and retained
earnings
|
|
$
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Company previously quantified
these errors under the rollover method and concluded that they
were immaterial, individually and in the aggregate, to the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(b) |
|
The Company historically did not
eliminate certain intercompany profits on the transfer of
inventory, which resulted in a cumulative overstatement of its
inventory by $4.8 million in years prior to Fiscal 2005 and
by $0.2 million in Fiscal 2005. In addition, the Company
included $4.3 million of certain product development costs
in its inventory in years prior to Fiscal 2005 that, in
hindsight, were not considered to be capitalizable. To correct
these misstatements, the Company reduced inventory by
$9.3 million as of April 2, 2006, with a corresponding
pre-tax reduction in retained earnings.
|
|
(c) |
|
In connection with a specialized
retail store construction project in one of its international
locations, the Company did not recognize rent expense upon
taking possession of the leased property and commencing
construction in Fiscal 2005. To correct these misstatements, the
Company recorded a $3.2 million net increase in its
liability for accrued rent as of April 2, 2006, with a
corresponding pre-tax reduction in retained earnings.
|
|
(d) |
|
The Company historically did not
properly account for differences between its investment bases in
certain consolidated and unconsolidated investees and its share
of the underlying equity of such investees. To correct these
misstatements, the Company reduced the carrying value of its
equity method investment by $1.9 million and increased its
minority interest liability by $1.0 million as of
April 2, 2006, with a corresponding pre-tax reduction of
$2.9 million in total to retained earnings.
|
|
(e) |
|
As a result of the misstatements
described above and $5.1 million of deferred tax balances
that were not supportable based on a subsequent analysis of
underlying book-tax basis differences, the Companys
provision for income taxes was cumulatively overstated by
$1.4 million in years prior to Fiscal 2005 and
$0.5 million in Fiscal 2005, and understated by
$3.4 million in Fiscal 2006. To correct these
misstatements, the Company increased its net deferred income tax
liability by a total of $1.5 million as of April 2,
2006, with a corresponding decrease in retained earnings.
|
F-15
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes An Interpretation of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109
(FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income tax positions. FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN 48 is a
two-step process. The Company first will be required to
determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position
will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any
related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical
merits of the position. A tax position that meets the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold will then
be measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in
the financial statements based upon the largest amount of
benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 is effective for
the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2008 (April 1,
2007). While the Company continues to analyze the effect from
adopting the provisions of FIN 48, it is currently
anticipated that a cumulative effect adjustment of up to
$85 million will be charged to retained earnings during the
first quarter of Fiscal 2008. This estimate is subject to change
as the Company completes its analysis.
Stock-Based
Compensation
In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS 123R and, in March
2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107
(SAB 107). SAB 107 provides implementation
guidance for companies to use in their adoption of
FAS 123R. FAS 123R supersedes both APB 25, which
permitted the use of the intrinsic-value method in accounting
for stock-based compensation, and Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure (FAS 123), which allowed
companies applying APB 25 to just disclose in their
financial statements the pro forma effect on net income from
applying the fair-value method of accounting for stock-based
compensation. The Company adopted FAS 123R as of
April 2, 2006. See Note 18 for further discussion of
the Companys stock-based compensation and the adoption of
FAS 123R.
Other
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Including an Amendment of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 115 (FAS 159).
FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure, on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis, financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value that are not currently required to be measured at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair
value option is elected will be recognized in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. FAS 159 is effective for the
Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2009 (March 30,
2008). The application of FAS 159 is not expected to have a
material effect on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting
for Defined Benefit Pension and other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R
(FAS 158). FAS 158 requires an employer
that is a business entity and sponsors one or more
single-employer defined benefit plans to recognize the funded
status of a benefit plan measured as the difference
between plan assets at fair value (with limited exceptions) and
the benefit obligation in its statement of financial
position. For a pension plan, the benefit obligation is the
projected benefit obligation; for any other postretirement
benefit plan, such as a retiree health care plan, the benefit
obligation is the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.
FAS 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2006. Because the Company does not currently
maintain any significant defined benefit plans, the application
of FAS 158 did not have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
F-16
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157). FAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in accordance with US GAAP and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for the
Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2009. The application of
FAS 157 is not expected to have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections (FAS 154). FAS 154
generally requires that accounting changes and errors be applied
retrospectively. Effective April 2, 2006, the Company
adopted the provisions of FAS 154. The application of
FAS 154 did not have an effect on the Companys
financial statements.
In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 151, Inventory Costs
(FAS 151). FAS 151 clarifies standards for
the treatment of abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs and spoilage. Effective April 2,
2006, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS 151. The
application of FAS 151 did not have a material effect on
the Companys financial statements.
|
|
5.
|
Acquisitions
and Joint Ventures
|
Fiscal
2008 Transactions
Japanese
Business Acquisitions
On May 29, 2007, the Company completed its previously
announced transactions to acquire control of certain of its
Japanese businesses that were formerly conducted under licensed
arrangements. In particular, the Company acquired approximately
77% of the outstanding shares of Impact 21 that it did not
previously own in a cash tender offer (the Impact 21
Acquisition), thereby increasing its ownership in Impact
21 from approximately 20% to 97%. Impact 21 conducts the
Companys mens, womens and jeans apparel and
accessories business in Japan under a
sub-license
arrangement. In addition, the Company acquired the remaining 50%
interest in PRL Japan, which holds the master license to conduct
Polos business in Japan, from Onward Kashiyama and Seibu
(the PRL Japan Minority Interest Acquisition).
Collectively, the Impact 21 Acquisition and the PRL Japan
Minority Interest Acquisition are hereafter referred to as the
Japanese Business Acquisitions.
The purchase price initially paid in connection with the Impact
21 Acquisition was approximately $327 million. However, the
Company intends to acquire, over the next several months, the
remaining approximately 3% of the outstanding shares not
exchanged as of the close of the tender offer period at an
estimated aggregate cost of approximately $12 million. In
addition, the purchase price paid in connection with the PRL
Japan Minority Interest Acquisition was approximately
$22 million.
The Company funded the Japanese Business Acquisitions with
available cash on-hand and approximately $170 million of
Yen-based borrowings under a one-year term loan agreement on
terms substantially similar to the Companys existing
credit facility. The Company expects to repay the borrowing by
its maturity date using a portion of the approximate
$200 million of Impact 21s cash on-hand acquired as
part of the acquisition.
The results of operations for Impact 21 will be consolidated
effective as of the beginning of Fiscal 2008. The results of
operations for PRL Japan already are consolidated by the Company
as described further in Note 2 to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
The Company is in the process of preparing its assessment of the
fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the
allocation of the purchase price. The Company also has entered
into a transition services agreement with Onward Kashiyama
which, along with its affiliates, was a former approximate 41%
shareholder of Impact 21, to provide a variety of
operational, human resources and information systems-related
services over a period of up to two years.
F-17
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Acquisition
of Small Leathergoods Business
On April 13, 2007, the Company acquired from Kellwood
Company (Kellwood) substantially all of the assets
of New Campaign, Inc., the Companys licensee for
mens and womens belts and other small leather goods
under the Ralph Lauren, Lauren and Chaps brands in the
U.S. The assets acquired from Kellwood will be operated
under the name of Polo Ralph Lauren Leathergoods and
will allow the Company to further expand its accessories
business. The acquisition cost was approximately
$10 million and is subject to customary closing
adjustments. Kellwood will provide various transition services
for up to six months after the closing.
The results of operations for the Polo Ralph Lauren Leathergoods
business will be consolidated in the Companys results of
operations commencing in Fiscal 2008. The Company is in the
process of preparing its assessment of the fair value of assets
acquired.
Formation
of Ralph Lauren Watch and Jewelry Joint Venture
On March 5, 2007, the Company announced that it had agreed
to form a joint venture with Financiere Richemont SA
(Richemont), the Swiss Luxury Goods Group. The
50-50 joint
venture will be a Swiss corporation named the Ralph Lauren Watch
and Jewelry Company, S.A.R.L. (the RL Watch
Company), whose purpose is to design, develop,
manufacture, sell and distribute luxury watches and fine jewelry
through Ralph Lauren boutiques, as well as through fine
independent jewelry and luxury watch retailers throughout the
world. The Company expects to account for its 50% interest in
the RL Watch Company under the equity method of accounting.
Royalty payments due to the Company under the related license
agreement for use of certain of the Companys trademarks
will be reflected as licensing revenue within the consolidated
statement of operations. The RL Watch Company is expected to
commence operations during the first quarter of Fiscal 2008 and
it is expected that the products will be launched in the fall of
calendar 2008.
Fiscal
2007 Transactions
Acquisition
of RL Media Minority Interest
On March 28, 2007, the Company acquired the remaining 50%
equity interest in RL Media formerly held by NBC (37.5%) and
Value Vision (12.5%). RL Media conducts the Companys
e-commerce
initiatives through the Polo.com internet site and is
consolidated by the Company as the primary beneficiary pursuant
to the provisions of FIN 46R. The acquisition cost was
$175 million. In addition, Value Vision entered into a
transition services agreement with the Company to provide order
fulfillment and related services over a period of up to
seventeen months from the date of the acquisition of the RL
Media minority interest.
The Company evaluated the terms of all significant pre-existing
relationships between itself and RL Media to determine if a
settlement of the pre-existing relationships existed. In
addition, the Company obtained valuation analyses of RL Media
prepared by an independent valuation firm. Based on these
analyses, as well as the rights and obligations of the parties
under the RL Media partnership agreement, the Company determined
that all of the consideration exchanged should be allocated to
the acquisition of the RL Media minority interest. Accordingly,
no settlement gain or loss was recognized in connection with
this transaction.
The excess of the acquisition cost over the pre-existing
minority interest liability of $33 million has been
allocated on a preliminary basis as follows: inventory of
$8 million; finite-lived intangible assets of
$55 million (consisting of the re-acquired license of
$50 million and customer list of $5 million); and
goodwill of $79 million. The Company is in the process of
completing its assessment of the fair value of assets acquired.
As a result, the estimated purchase price allocation is subject
to change.
F-18
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fiscal
2006 Transactions
Acquisition
of Polo Jeans Business
On February 3, 2006, the Company acquired from Jones
Apparel Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Jones) all
of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Sun
Apparel, Inc., the Companys licensee for mens and
womens casual apparel and sportswear in the U.S. and
Canada (the Polo Jeans Business). The acquisition
cost was approximately $260 million, including transaction
costs. In addition, simultaneous with the transaction, the
Company settled all claims under its litigation with Jones for a
cost of $100 million.
The Company determined that the terms of the pre-existing
licensing relationship were reflective of market. However,
because the Company simultaneously purchased a business and
settled all pre-existing litigation, the aggregate consideration
exchanged was required to be allocated for accounting purposes
in proportion to the underlying fair values of the legal
settlement and the Polo Jeans Business acquired. Based on the
arms-length negotiation with Jones, the Company determined
that the fair value of the legal settlement was
$100 million, which equaled the amount of a litigation
reserve initially established by the Company during Fiscal 2005.
The remaining $255 million of consideration exchanged was
allocated to the Polo Jeans Business based on valuation analyses
prepared by an independent valuation firm.
The results of operations for the Polo Jeans Business have been
consolidated in the Companys results of operations
commencing February 4, 2006. In addition, the accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the following
allocation of the acquisition cost to the net assets acquired
based on their respective fair values: inventory of
$36 million; finite-lived intangible assets of
$159 million (consisting of the re-acquired license of
$97 million, customer relationships of $57 million and
order backlog of $5 million); goodwill of
$126 million; and deferred tax and other liabilities, net,
of $61 million. Other than inventory, Jones retained the
right to all working capital balances on the date of closing.
The Company also entered into a transition services agreement
with Jones to provide a variety of operational, financial and
information systems services over a period of six to twelve
months from the date of the acquisition of the Polo Jeans
Business.
Acquisition
of Footwear Business
On July 15, 2005, the Company acquired from Reebok
International, Ltd. (Reebok) all of the issued and
outstanding shares of capital stock of Ralph Lauren Footwear
Co., Inc., the Companys global licensee for mens,
womens and childrens footwear, as well as certain
foreign assets owned by affiliates of Reebok (collectively, the
Footwear Business). The acquisition cost was
approximately $112 million in cash, including
$2 million of transaction costs. In addition, Reebok and
certain of its affiliates entered into a transition services
agreement with the Company to provide a variety of operational,
financial and information systems services over a period of
twelve to eighteen months from the date of the acquisition of
the Footwear Business.
The Company determined that the terms of the pre-existing
licensing relationship were reflective of market. As such, based
on valuation analyses prepared by an independent valuation firm,
the Company allocated all of the consideration exchanged to the
purchase of the Footwear Business and no settlement gain or loss
was recognized in connection with the transaction.
The results of operations for the Footwear Business for the
period have been consolidated in the Companys results of
operations commencing July 16, 2005. In addition, the
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
following allocation of the acquisition cost to the net assets
acquired based on their respective fair values: trade
receivables of $17 million; inventory of $26 million;
finite-lived intangible assets of $62 million (consisting
of the footwear license at $38 million, customer
relationships at $23 million and order backlog at
$1 million); goodwill of $20 million; other assets of
$1 million; and liabilities of $14 million.
F-19
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fiscal
2005 Transactions
Acquisition
of Childrenswear Business
On July 2, 2004, the Company acquired certain assets and
assumed certain liabilities of RL Childrenswear Company, LLC,
the Companys licensee holding the exclusive licenses to
design, manufacture, merchandise and sell newborn, infant,
toddler, girls and boys clothing in the U.S., Canada and Mexico
(the Childrenswear Business). The purchase price was
approximately $264 million, including transaction costs,
deferred payments of $15 million payable over the three
years after the acquisition date and $5 million of
contingent payments. The contingent payments were conditional on
certain sales targets being attained and, during Fiscal 2005,
the Company recognized the obligation with a corresponding
increase in goodwill because it became probable that the sales
targets would be attained. As of the end of Fiscal 2007,
$17 million of the deferred and conditional payments were
made and the remaining portion of approximately $3 million
of deferred and conditional payments were classified as a
component of other current liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
The results of operations for the Childrenswear Business for the
period are included in the Companys consolidated results
of operations commencing July 2, 2004. In addition, the
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
following allocation of the acquisition cost to the net assets
acquired based on their respective fair values: inventory of
$27 million; property and equipment of $8 million;
finite-lived intangible assets, of $32 million (consisting
of non-compete agreements of $2 million and customer
relationships of $30 million); other assets of
$1 million; goodwill of $208 million; and liabilities
of $12 million.
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
517.4
|
|
|
|
479.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
$
|
526.9
|
|
|
$
|
485.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment, net, consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
9.9
|
|
|
$
|
9.9
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
484.9
|
|
|
|
419.9
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
295.8
|
|
|
|
261.8
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
563.8
|
|
|
|
511.2
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,458.0
|
|
|
|
1,273.1
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(828.2
|
)
|
|
|
(724.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
629.8
|
|
|
$
|
548.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As discussed in Note 3, the Company periodically evaluates
the recoverability of the carrying value of fixed assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
assets values may be impaired. No impairment charges were
recognized in Fiscal 2007. During Fiscal 2006, the Company
recorded impairment charges of approximately $10.8 million
to reduce the carrying value of fixed assets, largely related to
its Club Monaco retail business that includes its Caban Concept
and Club Monaco factory stores. This impairment charge primarily
related to
lower-than-expected
store performance and preceded the Companys implementation
of a plan to restructure these operations in February 2006. In
measuring the amount of the impairment, fair value was
determined based on discounted expected cash flows. See
Note 11 for further discussion of the Club Monaco
restructuring plan and related charges.
The Company recorded a similar $1.5 million retail store
impairment charge during Fiscal 2005.
|
|
8.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
As discussed in Note 3, the Company accounts for goodwill
and other intangible assets in accordance with FAS 142.
Under FAS 142, goodwill and certain other intangible assets
deemed to have indefinite useful lives are not amortized.
Rather, goodwill and such indefinite-lived intangible assets are
subject to annual impairment testing. Finite-lived intangible
assets continue to be amortized over their respective estimated
useful lives. Based on the Companys annual impairment
testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in
Fiscal 2007, Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal 2005, no impairment charges
were deemed necessary.
Goodwill
The following analysis details the changes in goodwill for each
reportable segment during Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Balance at April 2,
2005
|
|
$
|
367.9
|
|
|
$
|
74.5
|
|
|
$
|
116.5
|
|
|
$
|
558.9
|
|
Acquisition-related
activity(a)
|
|
|
149.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.2
|
|
Other
adjustments(b)
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1,
2006
|
|
$
|
507.8
|
|
|
$
|
75.4
|
|
|
$
|
116.5
|
|
|
$
|
699.7
|
|
Acquisition-related
activity(a)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
Other
adjustments(b)
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
518.9
|
|
|
$
|
155.1
|
|
|
$
|
116.5
|
|
|
$
|
790.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Acquisition-related activity
primarily includes the acquisitions of the Footwear Business and
Polo Jeans Business in Fiscal 2006, and the acquisition of the
50% minority interest in RL Media in Fiscal 2007.
|
|
(b) |
|
Other adjustments principally
include changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
|
F-21
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other
Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amort.
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amort.
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to
amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-acquired licensed trademarks
|
|
$
|
194.3
|
|
|
$
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
182.5
|
|
|
$
|
144.5
|
|
|
$
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
139.5
|
|
Customer relationships / list
|
|
|
115.2
|
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
106.8
|
|
|
|
110.2
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
106.8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets subject to
amortization
|
|
|
316.9
|
|
|
|
(27.1
|
)
|
|
|
289.8
|
|
|
|
262.1
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
250.6
|
|
Intangible assets not subject
to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and brands
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
$
|
324.8
|
|
|
$
|
(27.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
297.7
|
|
|
$
|
270.0
|
|
|
$
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
258.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
Based on the amount of intangible assets subject to amortization
as of March 31, 2007, the expected amortization for each of
the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
215.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
289.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected amortization expense above reflects estimated
useful lives assigned to the Companys finite-lived
intangible assets as follows: re-acquired licensed trademarks of
10 to 25 years and customer relationships of 5 to
25 years.
F-22
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Other
Non-Current Assets
|
Other non-current assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Equity-method investments
|
|
$
|
62.2
|
|
|
$
|
63.6
|
|
Officers life insurance
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
77.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
105.2
|
|
|
|
87.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-current assets
|
|
$
|
297.2
|
|
|
$
|
203.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Other
Current and Non-Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Accrued operating expenses
|
|
$
|
277.3
|
|
|
$
|
214.8
|
|
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
|
69.4
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses and other
current liabilities
|
|
$
|
391.0
|
|
|
$
|
314.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
47.1
|
|
|
$
|
24.2
|
|
Deferred rent obligations
|
|
|
95.8
|
|
|
|
84.7
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
181.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
Other
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
384.0
|
|
|
$
|
174.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has recorded restructuring liabilities over the past
few years relating to various cost-savings initiatives, as well
as certain of its acquisitions. In accordance with US GAAP,
restructuring costs incurred in connection with an acquisition
are capitalized as part of the purchase accounting for the
transaction. Such acquisition-related restructuring costs were
not material in any period. Liabilities for costs associated
with non-acquisition-related restructuring initiatives are
expensed and initially measured at fair value when incurred in
accordance with US GAAP. A description of the nature of
significant non-acquisition-related restructuring activities and
related costs is presented below.
F-23
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fiscal
2007 Restructuring
In connection with the Club Monaco Restructuring Plan described
below, during Fiscal 2007 the Company ultimately decided to
close all of Club Monacos Caban Concept Stores (the
Caban Stores) and recognized $4.0 million of
associated restructuring charges, primarily relating to lease
termination costs.
Additionally, the Company recognized $0.6 million of other
restructuring charges primarily related to severance costs
associated with the transition of certain sourcing and
production functions from Columbia to the U.S. during
Fiscal 2007.
Fiscal
2006 Restructuring
During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2006, the Company committed
to a plan to restructure its Club Monaco retail business. In
particular, this plan consisted of the closure of all five Club
Monaco factory stores and the intention to dispose of by sale or
closure all eight of the Caban Stores (collectively, the
Club Monaco Restructuring Plan). In connection with
this plan, an aggregate restructuring-related charge of
$12 million was recognized in Fiscal 2006. This charge
consisted of (a) a $3 million writedown of inventory
to estimated net realizable value, which has been classified as
a component of cost of goods sold in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations, (b) a
$5 million writedown of fixed and other net assets, which
has been classified as a component of restructuring charges in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and
(c) the recognition of a $4 million liability relating
to lease termination costs, which has been classified as a
component of restructuring charges in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
A summary of the activity in the Club Monaco Restructuring Plan
liability during the applicable periods presented is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease and
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Balance at April 2,
2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions charged to expense
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Cash payments charged against
reserve
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1,
2006
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
Additions charged to expense
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Cash payments charged against
reserve
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2005 Restructuring
During Fiscal 2005, the Company incurred approximately
$2 million of restructuring costs, principally relating to
severance obligations in connection with its European
operations. Such obligations were substantially paid by the end
of Fiscal 2006, and the charge was classified as a component of
restructuring charges in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
F-24
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Domestic and foreign pre-tax income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
508.6
|
|
|
$
|
396.9
|
|
|
$
|
154.8
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
134.7
|
|
|
|
106.0
|
|
|
|
143.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income before provision for
income taxes
|
|
$
|
643.3
|
|
|
$
|
502.9
|
|
|
$
|
297.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and deferred income taxes (tax benefits) provided are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal(a)
|
|
$
|
250.7
|
|
|
$
|
118.0
|
|
|
$
|
102.0
|
|
State and
local(a)
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354.8
|
|
|
|
159.3
|
|
|
|
135.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(99.2
|
)
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
(33.6
|
)
|
State and local
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112.4
|
)
|
|
|
35.6
|
|
|
|
(28.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
242.4
|
|
|
$
|
194.9
|
|
|
$
|
107.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes federal, state and local
tax benefits of $33 million in Fiscal 2007,
$22 million in Fiscal 2006 and $19 million in Fiscal
2005 resulting from the exercise of employee stock options. In
addition, excludes federal, state and local tax benefits of
$31 million for Fiscal 2007 primarily related to the
repayment of the 1999 Euro Debt. Such amounts were credited to
stockholders equity.
|
The differences between income taxes expected at the
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35% and income
taxes provided are as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes at the
U.S. federal statutory rate
|
|
$
|
225.1
|
|
|
$
|
176.0
|
|
|
$
|
104.2
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local income taxes, net
of federal benefit
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
Foreign income taxed at different
rates, net of U.S. foreign tax credits
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
242.4
|
|
|
$
|
194.9
|
|
|
$
|
107.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Significant components of the Companys net deferred tax
assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
(liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable allowances and reserves
|
|
$
|
24.5
|
|
|
$
|
18.3
|
|
Uniform inventory capitalization
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Employee benefits and compensation
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Restructuring reserves and other
accrued expenses
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
NOLs and other tax attributed
carryforwards
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax assets
(liabilities)
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred tax assets
(liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
36.3
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible
assets
|
|
|
(96.3
|
)
|
|
|
(88.3
|
)
|
Net operating losses carryforwards
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
and hedges
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
72.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-current deferred tax
assets (liabilities)
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
(liabilities)
|
|
$
|
101.3
|
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has available federal, state and foreign net
operating loss carryforwards of $1.3 million,
$4.9 million and $9.3 million, respectively, for tax
purposes to offset future taxable income. The net operating loss
carryforwards expire beginning in Fiscal 2008. The utilization
of the federal net operating loss carryforwards is subject to
the limitations of Internal Revenue Code Section 382, which
applies following certain changes in ownership of the entity
generating the loss carryforward.
Also, the Company has available state and foreign net operating
loss carryforwards of $6.9 million and $4.1 million,
respectively, for which no net deferred tax asset has been
recognized. A full valuation allowance has been recorded since
management does not believe that the Company will more likely
than not be able to utilize these carryforwards to offset future
taxable income. Subsequent recognition of these deferred tax
assets would result in an income tax benefit in the year of such
recognition.
The valuation allowance decreased to $1.6 million in Fiscal
2007 from $9.5 million in Fiscal 2006. This decrease is
primarily due to the utilization of foreign net operating losses
for which a valuation allowance was previously recorded.
Provision has not been made for U.S. or additional foreign
taxes on $274.5 million of undistributed earnings of
foreign subsidiaries. Those earnings have been and will continue
to be reinvested. These earnings could become subject to tax if
they were remitted as dividends, if foreign earnings were lent
to PRLC, a subsidiary or a U.S. affiliate of PRLC, or if
the stock of the subsidiaries were sold. Determination of the
amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability with respect to
such earnings is not practical. Management believes that the
amount of the
F-26
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
additional taxes that might be payable on the earnings of
foreign subsidiaries, if remitted, would be partially offset by
U.S. foreign tax credits.
The Company is periodically examined by various federal, state
and foreign tax jurisdictions. The tax years under examination
vary by jurisdiction. The Company regularly considers the
likelihood of assessments in each of the taxing jurisdictions
and has established tax allowances which represent
managements best estimate of the potential assessments.
The resolution of tax matters could differ from the amount
reserved. While that difference could be material to the result
of operations and cash flows for any affected reporting period,
it is not expected to have a material impact on consolidated
financial position or consolidated liquidity.
The Company will adopt FIN 48 as of the beginning of Fiscal
2008 (April 1, 2007). While the Company continues to
analyze the effect from adopting the provisions of FIN 48,
it is currently anticipated that a cumulative effect adjustment
of up to $85 million will be charged to retained earnings
during the first quarter of Fiscal 2008. This estimate is
subject to change as the Company completes its analysis. See
Note 4 for the Companys discussion of recently issued
accounting standards, including accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes.
Debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
4.50% Euro-denominated notes due
October 2013
|
|
|
398.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.125% Euro-denominated notes due
November 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
398.8
|
|
|
|
280.4
|
|
Less: current maturities of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
398.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
Debt
The Company had outstanding approximately 227 million
principal amount of 6.125% notes that were due on
November 22, 2006, from an original issuance of
275 million in 1999 (the 1999 Euro Debt).
On October 5, 2006, the Company completed a new issuance of
300 million principal amount of 4.50% notes due
October 4, 2013 (the 2006 Euro Debt). The
Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the financing of
approximately $380 million (based on the exchange rate in
effect upon issuance) to repay the remaining 1999 Euro Debt at
par on its maturity date. The balance of such net proceeds was
used for general corporate and working capital purposes. The
Company has the option to redeem all of the 2006 Euro Debt at
any time at a redemption price equal to the principal amount
plus a premium. The Company also has the option to redeem all of
the 2006 Euro Debt at any time at par plus accrued interest, in
the event of certain developments involving U.S. tax law.
Partial redemption of the 2006 Euro Debt is not permitted in
either instance. In the event of a change of control of the
Company, each holder of the 2006 Euro Debt has the option to
require the Company to redeem the 2006 Euro Debt at its
principal amount plus accrued interest.
Revolving
Credit Facility and Term Loan
The Company has a credit facility, which was amended on
November 28, 2006, that provides for a $450 million
unsecured revolving line of credit (the Credit
Facility). The Credit Facility also is used to support the
issuance of letters of credit. As of March 31, 2007, there
were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility, but
the
F-27
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company was contingently liable for $25.7 million of
outstanding letters of credit (primarily relating to inventory
purchase commitments).
The Company amended certain terms of its Credit Facility as a
result of recent upgrades in its credit ratings from
Standard & Poors and Moodys. Key changes under
the amendment include:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in the ability of the Company to expand its
additional borrowing availability from $525 million to
$600 million, subject to the agreement of one or more new
or existing lenders under the facility to increase their
commitments;
|
|
|
|
An extension of the term of the Credit Facility to November 2011
from October 2009;
|
|
|
|
A reduction in the margin over LIBOR paid by the Company on
amounts drawn under the Credit Facility to 35 basis points
from 50 basis points;
|
|
|
|
A reduction in the commitment fee for the unutilized portion of
the Credit Facility to 8 basis points from 12.5 basis
points; and
|
|
|
|
The elimination of the coverage ratio financial covenant.
|
There are no mandatory reductions in borrowing ability
throughout the term of the Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at the
Companys option, either at (a) a base rate determined
by reference to the higher of (i) the prime commercial
lending rate of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. in effect from time
to time and (ii) the weighted-average overnight Federal
funds rate (as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York) plus 50 basis points or (b) a LIBOR rate in
effect from time to time, as adjusted for the Federal Reserve
Boards Euro currency liabilities maximum reserve
percentage plus a margin defined in the Credit Facility
(the applicable margin). The applicable margin of
35 basis points is subject to adjustment based on the
Companys credit ratings.
The Credit Facility was amended as of May 22, 2007 to
provide for the addition of a loan in a Japanese yen amount
equal to approximately $170 million (the Term
Loan). The Term Loan was made to Polo JP Acqui B.V., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and is guaranteed by the
Company, as well as the other subsidiaries of the Company which
currently guarantee the Credit Facility. The proceeds of the
Term Loan have been used to finance the Tender Offer and the
total related acquisition cost and the acquisition by the
Company of the remaining 50% of the shares of PRL Japan the
Company did not previously own. Borrowings under the Term Loan
bear interest at a LIBOR rate for yen loans for an interest
period of 12 months plus the applicable margin. The
maturity date of the Term Loan is on the
12-month
anniversary of the drawing date of the Term Loan. The Company
expects to repay the borrowing by its maturity date using a
portion of Impact 21s cash on-hand of approximately
$200 million acquired as part of the acquisition. See
Note 5 for further discussion of the Japanese Business
Acquisitions.
In addition to paying interest on any outstanding borrowings
under the Credit Facility, the Company is required to pay a
commitment fee to the lenders under the Credit Facility in
respect of the unutilized commitments. The commitment fee rate
of 8 basis points under the terms of the Credit Facility
also is subject to adjustment based on the Companys credit
ratings.
The Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among
other things, restrict the Companys ability, subject to
specified exceptions, to incur additional debt; incur liens and
contingent liabilities; sell or dispose of assets, including
equity interests; merge with or acquire other companies;
liquidate or dissolve itself; engage in businesses that are not
in a related line of business; make loans, advances or
guarantees; engage in transactions with affiliates; and make
investments. In addition, the Credit Facility requires the
Company to maintain a maximum ratio of Adjusted Debt to
Consolidated EBITDAR (the leverage ratio), as such
terms are defined in the Credit Facility. As of March 31,
2007, no Event of Default (as such term is defined pursuant to
the Credit Facility) has occurred under the Companys
Credit Facility.
F-28
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default under the Credit
Facility, the lenders may cease making loans, terminate the
Credit Facility, and declare all amounts outstanding to be
immediately due and payable. The Credit Facility specifies a
number of events of default (many of which are subject to
applicable grace periods), including, among others, the failure
to make timely principal and interest payments or to satisfy the
covenants, including the financial covenant described above.
Additionally, the Credit Facility provides that an Event of
Default will occur if Mr. Ralph Lauren, the Companys
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and related entities fail
to maintain a specified minimum percentage of the voting power
of the Companys common stock.
Fair
Value of Debt
Based on the prevailing level of market interest rates as of
March 31, 2007, the carrying value of the Companys
2006 Euro Debt exceeded its fair value by approximately
$4 million. As of April 1, 2006, the fair value of the
Companys 1999 Euro Debt approximated its carrying value.
Unrealized gains or losses on debt do not result in the
realization or expenditure of cash, unless the debt is retired
prior to its maturity.
|
|
14.
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
|
The Company has exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange
rates relating to certain anticipated cash flows generated by
its international operations and possible declines in the fair
value of reported net assets of certain of its foreign
operations, as well as exposure to changes in the fair value of
its fixed-rate debt relating to changes in interest rates.
Consequently, the Company periodically uses derivative financial
instruments to manage such risks. The Company does not enter
into derivative transactions for speculative purposes. The
following is a summary of the Companys risk management
strategies and the effect of those strategies on the
Companys financial statements.
Foreign
Currency Risk Management
Foreign
Currency Exchange Contracts
The Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts as
hedges, primarily relating to identifiable currency positions to
reduce its risk from exchange rate fluctuations on inventory
purchases and intercompany royalty payments made by certain of
its international operations. As part of its overall strategy to
manage the level of exposure to the risk of foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations, primarily exposure to changes in the
value of the Euro and the Japanese Yen, the Company hedges a
portion of its foreign currency exposures anticipated over the
ensuing twelve-month to two-year periods. In doing so, the
Company uses foreign exchange contracts that generally have
maturities of three months to two years to provide continuing
coverage throughout the hedging period.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had contracts for the
sale of $214 million of foreign currencies at fixed rates.
Of these $214 million of sales contracts, $180 million
were for the sale of Euros and $34 million were for the
sale of Japanese Yen. The total fair value of the forward
contracts was an unrealized loss of $1.9 million. As of
April 1, 2006, the Company had contracts for the sale of
$90 million of foreign currencies at fixed rates. Of these
$90 million of sales contracts, $22 million were for
the sale of Euros and $68 million were for the sale of
Japanese Yen. The total fair value of the forward contracts
was an unrealized loss of $1.8 million.
The Company records foreign currency exchange contracts at fair
value in its balance sheet and designates these derivative
instruments as cash flow hedges in accordance with FAS 133.
As such, the related gains or losses on these contracts are
deferred in stockholders equity as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income. These deferred gains and
losses are then either recognized in income in the period in
which the related royalties being hedged are received, or in the
case of inventory purchases, recognized as part of the cost of
the inventory being hedged when sold. However, to the extent
that any of these foreign currency exchange contracts are not
considered to be perfectly effective in offsetting the change in
the value of the royalties or inventory purchases being hedged,
any changes in fair value relating to the ineffective portion of
these contracts are immediately recognized in earnings. No
significant gains or losses relating to ineffective hedges were
recognized in the periods presented.
F-29
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company had deferred net losses on foreign currency exchange
contracts in the amount of approximately $2 million at the
end of Fiscal 2007, all of which is expected to be recognized in
earnings in Fiscal 2008. Net losses on foreign currency exchange
contracts in the amount of approximately $1 million were
deferred at the end of Fiscal 2006. The Company recognized net
gains on foreign currency exchange contracts in earnings of
approximately $4 million for Fiscal 2007 and
$5 million for Fiscal 2006.
Subsequent to the end of Fiscal 2007, the Company entered into
foreign currency option contracts with a notional value of
$159 million for the right, but not the obligation, to
purchase foreign currencies at fixed rates. These contracts
hedged the majority of the foreign currency exposure related to
the financing of the Japanese Business Acquisitions, but do not
qualify under FAS 133 for hedge accounting treatment. The
Company will recognize a gain or loss, limited to the premium
paid for the option contracts, upon the settlement of the
contracts during the first quarter of Fiscal 2008.
Hedge of
a Net Investment in Certain European Subsidiaries
Prior to the Companys repayment of the 1999 Euro Debt in
November 2006, the entire principal amount was designated as a
hedge of the Companys net investment in certain of its
European subsidiaries in accordance with FAS 133.
Contemporaneous with this repayment, the Company designated the
entire principal amount of the 2006 Euro Debt, issued in October
2006 (see Note 13 for further discussion), as a hedge of
its net investment in certain of its European subsidiaries. As
required by FAS 133, the changes in fair value of a
derivative instrument or a non-derivative financial instrument
(such as debt) that is designated as, and is effective as, a
hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation are reported in
the same manner as a translation adjustment under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, Foreign
Currency Translation, to the extent it is effective as a
hedge. As such, changes in the fair value of the 1999 Euro Debt
and the 2006 Euro Debt resulting from changes in the Euro
exchange rate have been, and continue to be, reported in
stockholders equity as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income. The Company recorded aggregate gains
(losses) net of tax in stockholders equity on the
translation of the 1999 Euro Debt and 2006 Euro Debt to
U.S. dollars in the amount of approximately
$(19) million for Fiscal 2007, $4 million for Fiscal
2006 and ($18) million for Fiscal 2005.
Interest
Rate Risk Management
Historically, the Company has used floating-rate interest rate
swap agreements to hedge changes in the fair value of its
fixed-rate 1999 Euro Debt. These interest rate swap agreements,
which effectively converted fixed interest rate payments on the
Companys 1999 Euro Debt to a floating-rate basis, were
designated as a fair value hedge in accordance with
FAS 133. All interest rate swap agreements were terminated
in late Fiscal 2006 and there were no outstanding agreements at
the end of Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006.
During the first six months of Fiscal 2007, the Company entered
into three forward-starting interest rate swap contracts
aggregating 200 million notional amount of
indebtedness in anticipation of the Companys proposed
refinancing of the 1999 Euro Debt, which was completed in
October 2006. The Company designated these agreements as a cash
flow hedge of a forecasted transaction to issue new debt in
connection with the planned refinancing of its 1999 Euro Debt.
The interest rate swaps hedged a total of
200.0 million, a portion of the underlying interest
rate exposure on the anticipated refinancing. Under the terms of
the three interest swap contracts, the Company paid a
weighted-average fixed rate of interest of 4.1% and received
variable interest based upon six-month EURIBOR. The Company
terminated the swaps on September 28, 2006, which was the
date the interest rate for the 2006 Euro Debt was determined. As
a result, the Company made a payment of approximately
3.5 million ($4.4 million based on the exchange
rate in effect on that date) in settlement of the swaps. An
amount of $0.2 million was recognized as a loss for the
three months ending September 30, 2006 due to the partial
ineffectiveness of the cash flow hedge as a result of the
forecasted transaction closing on October 5, 2006 instead
of November 22, 2006 (the maturity date of the 1999 Euro
Debt). The remaining loss of $4.2 million has been
F-30
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
deferred as a component of comprehensive income within
stockholders equity and is being recognized in income as
an adjustment to interest expense over the seven-year term of
the 2006 Euro Debt.
Credit
Risk
The Company monitors its positions with, and the credit quality
of, the financial institutions that are party to any of its
financial transactions. Credit risk related to derivative
financial instruments is considered low because the agreements
are entered into with strong creditworthy counterparties.
|
|
15.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Leases
The Company operates its retail stores under various leasing
arrangements. The Company also occupies various office and
warehouse facilities and uses certain equipment under many lease
agreements. Such leasing arrangements are accounted for under
the provisions of FAS 13 as either operating leases or
capital leases. In this context, capital leases include leases
whereby the Company is considered to have the substantive risks
of ownership during construction of a leased property pursuant
to the provisions of
EITF 97-10.
Information on the Companys operating and capital leasing
activities is set forth below.
Operating
Leases
The Company is typically required to make minimum rental
payments, and often contingent rental payments, under its
operating leases. Substantially all factory and full-price
retail store leases provide for contingent rentals based upon
sales, and certain rental agreements require payment based
solely on a percentage of sales. Terms of the Companys
leases generally contain renewal options, rent escalation
clauses and landlord incentives. Rent expense, net of sublease
income which was not significant, was $172 million in
Fiscal 2007, $137 million in Fiscal 2006 and
$128 million in Fiscal 2005. Such amounts include
contingent rental charges of $12 million in Fiscal 2007,
$12 million in Fiscal 2006 and $10 million in Fiscal
2005. In addition to such amounts, the Company is normally
required to pay taxes, insurance and occupancy costs relating to
the leased real estate properties.
As of March 31, 2007, future minimum rental payments under
noncancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one
year were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Minimum
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease
|
|
|
|
Payments(a)
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
156.7
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
147.4
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
131.8
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
108.5
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
99.7
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
556.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,200.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Net of sublease income, which is
not significant in any period.
|
Capital
Leases
Assets under capital leases amounted to $56 million at the
end of Fiscal 2007 and $32 million at the end of Fiscal
2006. Such assets are classified within property and equipment
in the accompanying consolidated balance
F-31
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
sheets. As of March 31, 2007, future minimum rental
payments under noncancelable capital leases with lease terms in
excess of one year were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Minimum
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease
|
|
|
|
Payments(a)
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Net of sublease income, which is
not significant in any period.
|
Employment
Agreements
The Company has employment agreements with certain executives in
the normal course of business which provide for compensation and
certain other benefits. These agreements also provide for
severance payments under certain circumstances.
Other
Commitments
Other off-balance sheet firm commitments, which include
outstanding letters of credit and minimum funding commitments to
investees, amounted to approximately $36 million as of
March 31, 2007.
In addition, see Note 5 for a discussion of the
Companys purchase price commitments related to the New
Campaign and Japanese Business Acquisitions.
Litigation
Credit
Card Matters
The Company is indirectly subject to various claims relating to
allegations of security breaches in certain of its retail store
information systems. These claims have been made by various
credit card associations, issuing banks and credit card
processors with respect to cards issued by them pursuant to the
rules imposed by certain credit card issuers, particularly
Visa®
and
MasterCard®.
The allegations include fraudulent credit card charges, the cost
of replacing credit cards, related monitoring expenses and other
related claims.
In Fiscal 2005, the Company was subject to various claims
relating to an alleged security breach of its
point-of-sale
systems that occurred at certain Polo retail stores in the
U.S. The Company has previously recorded a reserve in an
aggregate amount of $13 million to provide for its best
estimate of losses related to these claims. $6.2 million
was recorded during Fiscal 2005 and the remaining
$6.8 million of this reserve was recorded during Fiscal
2006. The Company has paid $11.4 million through
March 31, 2007 in settlement of these various claims. The
eligibility period for filing any new claims with respect to
this matter expired at the end of January 2007.
In addition, in the third quarter of Fiscal 2007, the Company
was notified of an alleged compromise of its retail store
information systems that process its credit card data for
certain Club Monaco stores in Canada. While the investigation of
the alleged Club Monaco compromise is ongoing, the evidence to
date indicates that only numerical credit card data may have
been accessed and not customer names or contact information. The
Companys Canadian credit card processor has thus far
required the Company to create a reserve of $2 million to
cover potential claims
F-32
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
relating to this alleged compromise and has deducted funds from
Club Monaco credit card transactions to establish this reserve.
Since the Company has been advised by its credit card processor
that potential claims related to this matter are likely to
exceed $2 million in the aggregate, the Company has also
recorded an additional $3 million charge during Fiscal 2007
to increase the total reserve for this matter to $5 million
based on its best estimate of exposure. Although claims brought
against the Company could exceed the amount of the
$5 million reserve, the ultimate resolution of these claims
is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Companys liquidity or financial position.
The Company is cooperating with law enforcement authorities in
both the U.S. and Canada in their investigations of these
matters.
Wathne
Imports Litigation
On August 19, 2005, Wathne Imports, Ltd., our domestic
licensee for luggage and handbags (Wathne), filed a
complaint in the U.S. District Court in the Southern
District of New York against us and Ralph Lauren, our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, asserting, among other things,
federal trademark law violations, breach of contract, breach of
obligations of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and negligent
misrepresentation. The complaint sought, among other relief,
injunctive relief, compensatory damages in excess of
$250 million and punitive damages of not less than
$750 million. On September 13, 2005, Wathne withdrew
this complaint from the U.S. District Court and filed a
complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New
York County, making substantially the same allegations and
claims (excluding the federal trademark claims), and seeking
similar relief. On February 1, 2006, the court granted our
motion to dismiss all of the causes of action, including the
cause of action against Mr. Lauren, except for the breach
of contract claims, and denied Wathnes motion for a
preliminary injunction. A trial date is not yet set for this
lawsuit on the breach of contract claims but the Company does
not currently anticipate that a trial will occur prior to
calendar 2008. We believe this lawsuit to be without merit, we
have recently moved for summary judgment and we intend to
continue to contest this lawsuit vigorously. Accordingly,
management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this
matter will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
liquidity or financial position.
Polo
Trademark Litigation
On October 1, 1999, we filed a lawsuit against the
U.S. Polo Association Inc. (USPA), Jordache,
Ltd. (Jordache) and certain other entities
affiliated with them, alleging that the defendants were
infringing on our trademarks. In connection with this lawsuit,
on July 19, 2001, the USPA and Jordache filed a lawsuit
against us in the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York. This suit, which was effectively a
counterclaim by them in connection with the original trademark
action, asserted claims related to our actions in connection
with our pursuit of claims against the USPA and Jordache for
trademark infringement and other unlawful conduct. Their claims
stemmed from our contacts with the USPAs and
Jordaches retailers in which we informed these retailers
of our position in the original trademark action. All claims and
counterclaims, except for our claims that the defendants
violated the Companys trademark rights, were settled in
September 2003. We did not pay any damages in this settlement.
On July 30, 2004, the Court denied all motions for summary
judgment, and trial began on October 3, 2005 with respect
to the four double horseman symbols that the
defendants sought to use. On October 20, 2005, the jury
rendered a verdict, finding that one of the defendants
marks violated our world famous Polo Player Symbol trademark and
enjoining its further use, but allowing the defendants to use
the remaining three marks. On November 16, 2005, we filed a
motion before the trial court to overturn the jurys
decision and hold a new trial with respect to the three marks
that the jury found not to be infringing. The USPA and Jordache
opposed our motion, but did not move to overturn the jurys
decision that the fourth double horseman logo did infringe on
our trademarks. On July 7, 2006, the judge denied our
motion to overturn the jurys decision. On August 4,
2006, the Company filed an appeal of the judges decision
to deny the Companys motion for a new trial to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Company
is awaiting a decision from the Court with respect to this
appeal.
F-33
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
California
Labor Law Litigation
On September 18, 2002, an employee at one of our stores
filed a lawsuit against the Company and our Polo Retail, LLC
subsidiary in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Northern California alleging violations of California antitrust
and labor laws. The plaintiff purported to represent a class of
employees who had allegedly been injured by a requirement that
certain retail employees purchase and wear Company apparel as a
condition of their employment. The complaint, as amended, sought
an unspecified amount of actual and punitive damages,
disgorgement of profits and injunctive and declaratory relief.
The Company answered the amended complaint on November 4,
2002. A hearing on cross motions for summary judgment on the
issue of whether the Companys policies violated California
law took place on August 14, 2003. The Court granted
partial summary judgment with respect to certain of the
plaintiffs claims, but concluded that more discovery was
necessary before it could decide the key issue as to whether the
Company had maintained for a period of time a dress code policy
that violated California law. On January 12, 2006, a
proposed settlement of the purported class action was submitted
to the court for approval. A hearing on the settlement was held
before the Court on June 29, 2006. On October 26,
2006, the Court granted preliminary approval of the settlement
and agreed to begin the process of sending out claim forms to
members of the class. On March 28, 2007, the Court granted
final approval of the settlement and awarded approximately
$1.1 million to members of the class and their attorneys.
The Company had previously established a reserve of
$1.5 million for this matter in Fiscal 2005. The
Courts approval of the settlement also resulted in the
dismissal of the similar purported class action filed in
San Francisco Superior Court, as described below.
On April 14, 2003, a second putative class action was filed
in the San Francisco Superior Court. This suit, brought by
the same attorneys, alleged near identical claims to those in
the federal class action. The class representatives consisted of
former employees and the plaintiff in the federal class action.
Defendants in this class action included us and our Polo Retail,
LLC, Fashions Outlet of America, Inc., Polo Retail, Inc. and
San Francisco Polo, Ltd. subsidiaries as well as a
non-affiliated corporate defendant and two current managers. As
in the federal class action, the complaint sought an unspecified
amount of actual and punitive restitution of monies spent, and
declaratory relief. As noted above, on March 28, 2007, the
Court granted final approval of the settlement in the federal
class action, which resulted in the dismissal of this lawsuit.
On March 2, 2006, a former employee at our Club Monaco
store in Los Angeles, California filed a lawsuit against us in
the San Francisco Superior Court alleging violations of
California wage and hour laws. The plaintiff purports to
represent a class of Club Monaco store employees who allegedly
have been injured by being improperly classified as exempt
employees and thereby not receiving compensation for overtime
and not receiving meal and rest breaks. The complaint seeks an
unspecified amount of compensatory damages, disgorgement of
profits, attorneys fees and injunctive relief. We believe
this suit is without merit and intend to contest it vigorously.
Accordingly, management does not expect that the ultimate
resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on
the Companys liquidity or financial position.
On June 2, 2006, a second putative class action was filed
by different attorneys by a former employee of our Club Monaco
store in Cabazon, California against us in the Los Angeles
Superior Court alleging virtually identical claims as the
San Francisco action and consisting of the same class
members. As in the San Francisco action, the complaint
sought an unspecified amount of compensatory damages,
disgorgement of profits, attorneys fees and injunctive
relief. On August 21, 2006, the plaintiff voluntarily
withdrew his lawsuit.
On May 30, 2006, four former employees of our Ralph Lauren
stores in Palo Alto and San Francisco, California filed a
lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court alleging violations
of California wage and hour laws. The plaintiffs purport to
represent a class of employees who allegedly have been injured
by not properly being paid commission earnings, not being paid
overtime, not receiving rest breaks, being forced to work off of
the clock while waiting to enter or leave the store and being
falsely imprisoned while waiting to leave the store. The
complaint seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory damages,
damages for emotional distress, disgorgement of profits,
punitive damages, attorneys fees and injunctive and
declaratory relief. We believe this suit is without merit and
intend to
F-34
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
contest it vigorously. Accordingly, management does not expect
that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material
adverse effect on the Companys liquidity or financial
position.
French
Income Tax Audit
The French tax authorities are in the process of auditing one of
the Companys French subsidiaries for the taxable years
2000 through 2005. Among other matters still under review, the
French tax authorities have asserted that certain intercompany
royalty payments made by the Companys French subsidiary to
a related U.S. subsidiary were excessive and that a portion
should be disallowed as a deduction under French tax law.
The Company disagrees with the position of the French tax
authorities that such royalties were excessive. It is expected
that the matter ultimately will be resolved under the competent
authority procedures of the US-France Income Tax Treaty in order
to avoid the double taxation of such income.
Under French tax law, the Company was required to provide bank
guarantees for the payment of the asserted tax assessment prior
to resolution under the competent authority procedures.
Accordingly, the Company has arranged for certain banks to
guarantee payment to the French tax authorities on behalf of the
Company in the amount of 41.3 million
($55.1 million). In order to secure these guarantees,
primarily in Fiscal 2007, the Company placed a corresponding
amount of cash in escrow with the banks as collateral for the
guarantees. Such cash has been classified as restricted
cash and reported as a component of other
assets in the Companys accompanying consolidated
balance sheet. Management does not expect that the ultimate
resolution of the asserted excess royalties matter will have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
The French tax authorities are required to complete their audit
by December 31, 2007. While no significant adjustments
other than the asserted excess royalty matter have been formally
proposed by the French tax authorities as of the end of April
2007, certain tax positions taken by the Company in connection
with the restructuring of its European operations in Fiscal 2004
could be challenged. The Company maintains a tax reserve against
this potential exposure based on its best estimate of the
probable outcome. However, if asserted, it is reasonably
possible that an unfavorable settlement could exceed the
Companys established reserves by an estimated amount of up
to approximately $30 million, including related employee
profit-sharing obligations required under French law based on
the reassessed higher level of taxable income. Nevertheless,
management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this
matter will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
liquidity or financial condition.
Other
Matters
We are otherwise involved from time to time in legal claims and
proceedings involving credit card fraud, trademark and
intellectual property, licensing, employee relations and other
matters incidental to our business. We believe that the
resolution of these other matters currently pending will not
individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition or results of operations.
Capital
Stock
The Companys capital stock consists of two classes of
common stock. There are 500 million shares of Class A
common stock and 100 million shares of Class B common
stock authorized to be issued. Shares of Class A and
Class B common stock have substantially identical rights,
except with respect to voting rights. Holders of Class A
common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of
Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share.
Holders of both classes of stock vote together as a single class
on all matters presented to the stockholders for their approval,
except with respect to the election and removal of directors or
as otherwise required by applicable law. All outstanding shares
of Class B common stock are owned by Mr. Ralph Lauren,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and related entities.
F-35
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Common
Stock Repurchase Program
In November 2006, the Companys Board of Directors approved
an expansion of the Companys existing common stock
repurchase program that allows the Company to repurchase up to
$500 million of Class A common stock. Repurchases of
shares of Class A common stock are subject to overall
business and market conditions. In Fiscal 2007, share
repurchases under the expanded and pre-existing programs
amounted to 3.5 million shares of Class A common stock
at a cost of $231.3 million. The remaining availability
under the common stock repurchase program was
$368.3 million as of March 31, 2007.
In Fiscal 2006, the Company repurchased 69.3 thousand shares of
Class A common stock at a cost of approximately
$4 million. No shares of Class A common stock were
repurchased in Fiscal 2005.
Repurchased shares are accounted for as treasury stock at cost
and will be held in treasury for future use.
Dividends
Since 2003, the Company has maintained a regular quarterly cash
dividend program of $0.05 per share, or $0.20 per
share on an annual basis, on its common stock. Dividends paid
amounted to $21 million in Fiscal 2007, $21 million in
Fiscal 2006 and $22 million in Fiscal 2005.
|
|
17.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
The following summary sets forth the components of other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, accumulated in
stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Total Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Translation Gains
|
|
|
Instrument Gains
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
(Losses)(a)
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Balance at April 3,
2004
|
|
$
|
73.8
|
|
|
$
|
(50.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
23.1
|
|
Fiscal 2005 pretax
activity(b)
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
Fiscal 2005 tax benefit
(provision)(b)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 2,
2005
|
|
|
85.1
|
|
|
|
(55.2
|
)
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
Fiscal 2006 pretax
activity(c)
|
|
|
(28.0
|
)
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
Fiscal 2006 tax benefit
(provision)(c)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1,
2006
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
|
|
(45.5
|
)
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Fiscal 2007 pretax
activity(d)
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
(34.8
|
)
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
Fiscal 2007 tax benefit
(provision)(d)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
115.3
|
|
|
$
|
(74.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes deferred gains and losses
on hedging instruments, such as foreign currency exchange
contracts designated as cash flow hedges and changes in the fair
value of the Companys Euro-denominated debt designated as
a hedge of changes in the fair value of the Companys net
investment in certain of its European subsidiaries.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes a net reclassification
adjustment of $9.4 million (net of $1.5 million tax
effect) for realized derivative financial instrument losses in
the current period that were included as an unrealized loss in
comprehensive income in a prior period.
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes a net reclassification
adjustment of $4.6 million (net of $0.2 million tax
effect) for realized derivative financial instrument gains in
the current period that were included as an unrealized gain in
comprehensive income in a prior period.
|
|
(d) |
|
Includes a net reclassification
adjustment of $3.1 million (net of $0.5 million tax
effect) for realized derivative financial instrument gains in
the current period that were included as an unrealized gain in
comprehensive income in a prior period.
|
F-36
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
Effective April 2, 2006, the Company adopted FAS 123R
using the modified prospective application transition method.
Under this transition method, the compensation expense
recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations beginning April 2, 2006 includes compensation
expense for (a) all stock-based payments granted prior to,
but not yet vested as of, April 1, 2006, based on the
grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original
provisions of FAS 123 and (b) all stock-based payments
granted subsequent to April 1, 2006, based on the
grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of FAS 123R.
Impact
on Results
A summary of the total compensation expense and associated
income tax benefits recognized related to stock-based
compensation arrangements is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(a)
|
|
|
2005(a)
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Compensation expense
|
|
$
|
(43.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.4
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the incremental impact of adopting FAS 123R is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
(millions, except per
|
|
|
|
share data)
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes
|
|
$
|
(17.0
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities(b)
|
|
$
|
(33.7
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
$
|
33.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
compensation(c)
|
|
$
|
42.7
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
$
|
(42.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Prior to the adoption of
FAS 123R and in accordance with existing accounting
principles, the Company recognized stock-based compensation
expense in connection with both service-based and
performance-based restricted stock units, as well as for shares
of restricted stock.
|
|
(b) |
|
Prior to the adoption of
FAS 123R, benefits of tax deductions in excess of
recognized compensation costs were reported as operating cash
flows. FAS 123R requires excess tax benefits to be reported
as a financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes
paid.
|
|
(c) |
|
Unearned compensation was
eliminated against additional paid-in capital as part of the
adoption of FAS 123R as of April 2, 2006.
|
Transition
Information
Prior to April 2, 2006, the Company accounted for
stock-based compensation plans under the intrinsic value method
in accordance with APB 25 and adopted the disclosure-only
provisions of FAS 123. Under this standard, the Company did
not recognize compensation expense for the issuance of stock
options with an exercise price equal to or greater than the
market price at the date of grant. However, as required, the
Company disclosed, in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements, the pro forma expense impact of the stock option
grants as if the fair-value-based recognition provisions of
FAS 123 were applied. Compensation expense was previously
recognized for restricted
F-37
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
stock and restricted stock units. The effect of forfeitures on
restricted stock and restricted stock units was recognized when
such forfeitures occurred.
In accordance with the modified prospective application
transition method, prior period financial statements have not
been restated to reflect the effects of implementing
FAS 123R. The following table presents the Companys
pro forma net income and net income per share if compensation
expense for fixed stock option grants had been determined based
on the fair value at the grant dates of such awards as defined
by FAS 123 for Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income as reported
|
|
$
|
308.0
|
|
|
$
|
190.4
|
|
Add: stock-based employee
compensation expense included in reported net income, net of tax
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Deduct: total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value-based method
for all awards, net of tax
|
|
|
(29.3
|
)
|
|
|
(21.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
294.9
|
|
|
$
|
176.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share as reported:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
Pro forma net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.76
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
Long-term
Stock Incentive Plan
The Companys 1997 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended (the 1997 Plan), authorizes the grant of
awards to participants with respect to a maximum of
26.0 million shares of the Companys Class A
common stock; however, there are limits as to the number of
shares available for certain awards and to any one participant.
Equity awards that may be made under the 1997 Plan include
(a) stock options, (b) restricted stock and
(c) restricted stock units.
Stock
Options
Stock options have been granted to employees and non-employee
directors with exercise prices equal to fair market value at the
date of grant. Generally, the options become exercisable ratably
(a graded-vesting schedule), over a three-year vesting period
for employees or over a two-year vesting period for non-employee
directors. Stock options generally expire either seven or ten
years from the date of grant. The Company recognizes
compensation expense for share-based awards that have graded
vesting and no performance conditions on an accelerated basis.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to
estimate the fair value of stock options granted, which requires
the input of subjective assumptions. The Company developed its
assumptions by analyzing the historical exercise behavior of
employees and non-employee directors. The Companys
assumptions used for the fiscal years presented were as follows:
Expected Term The estimate of expected term
is based on the historical exercise behavior of employees and
non-employee directors, as well as the contractual life of the
option grants.
F-38
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expected Volatility The expected volatility
factor is based on the historical volatility of the
Companys common stock for a period equal to the stock
options expected term.
Expected Dividend Yield The expected dividend
yield is based on the regular quarterly cash dividend of
$0.05 per share.
Risk-free Interest Rate The risk-free
interest rate is determined using the implied yield for a traded
zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond with a term equal to the
options expected term.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
33.2
|
%
|
|
|
29.1
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
|
|
0.45
|
%
|
|
|
0.57
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Weighted-average option grant date
fair value
|
|
$
|
19.40
|
|
|
$
|
14.50
|
|
|
$
|
11.90
|
|
A summary of the stock option activity under all plans during
Fiscal 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value(a)
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
April 2, 2006
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
$
|
28.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
56.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,097
|
)
|
|
|
26.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
39.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
6,885
|
|
|
$
|
32.79
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
379.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to
vest(b)
at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
6,644
|
|
|
$
|
32.31
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
369.2
|
|
Options exercisable at
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
$
|
26.37
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
285.8
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The intrinsic value is the amount
by which the market price at the end of the period of the
underlying share of stock exceeds the exercise price of the
stock option.
|
|
(b) |
|
The number of options expected to
vest takes into consideration estimated expected forfeitures.
|
Additional information pertaining to the Companys stock
option plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of stock
options
exercised(a)
|
|
$
|
88.7
|
|
|
$
|
58.5
|
|
|
$
|
36.0
|
|
Cash received from the exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
Tax benefits realized on exercise
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The intrinsic value is the amount
by which the average market price during the period exceeded the
exercise price of the stock option exercised.
|
F-39
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of March 31, 2007, there was $9.7 million of total
unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock
options granted and the unrecognized compensation expense is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.1 years.
Restricted
Stock and Restricted Stock Units
(RSUs)
The Company grants restricted shares of Class A common
stock and service-based restricted stock units to certain of its
senior executives. In addition, the Company grants
performance-based restricted stock units to such senior
executives and other key executives, and certain other employees
of the Company.
Restricted shares of Class A common stock, which entitle
the holder to receive a specified number of shares of
Class A common stock at the end of a vesting period, are
accounted for at fair value at the date of grant. In addition,
holders of restricted shares are entitled to receive cash
dividends in connection with the payments of dividends on the
Companys Class A common stock. Generally, restricted
stock grants vest over a five-year period of time, subject to
the executives continuing employment.
Restricted stock units entitle the grantee to receive shares of
Class A common stock at the end of a vesting period.
Service-based restricted stock units are payable in shares of
Class A common stock and generally vest over a five-year
period of time, subject to the executives continuing
employment. Performance-based restricted stock units also are
payable in shares of Class A common stock and generally
vest over (1) a three-year period of time (cliff vesting),
subject to the employees continuing employment and the
Companys satisfaction of certain performance goals over
the three-year period; or (2) ratably over a three-year
period of time (graded vesting), subject to the employees
continuing employment during the applicable vesting period and
the achievement by the Company of separate annual performance
goals. In addition, holders of certain restricted stock units
are entitled to receive dividend equivalents in the form of
additional restricted stock units in connection with the payment
of dividends on the Companys Class A common stock.
Restricted stock units, including shares resulting from dividend
equivalents paid on such units, are accounted for at fair value
at the date of grant. The fair value of a restricted security is
based on the fair value of unrestricted Class A common
stock, as adjusted to reflect the absence of dividends for those
restricted securities that are not entitled to dividend
equivalents. Compensation expense for performance-based
restricted stock units is recognized over the service period
when attainment of the performance goals is probable.
A summary of the restricted stock and restricted stock unit
activity during Fiscal 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Service-Based RSUs
|
|
|
Performance-Based RSUs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at April 2, 2006
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
24.47
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
$
|
34.46
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
$
|
39.38
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
55.43
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
55.17
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
21.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
34.23
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
51.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
26.25
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
37.69
|
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
$
|
46.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Service-Based RSUs
|
|
|
Performance-Based RSUs
|
|
|
Total unrecognized compensation at
March 31, 2007 (millions)
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
26.6
|
|
Weighted-average years expected to
be recognized over (in years)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
F-40
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Additional information pertaining to the restricted stock and
restricted stock unit activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair
value of awards granted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36.96
|
|
Total fair value of awards vested
(millions)
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Service-Based RSUs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair
value of awards granted
|
|
$
|
55.43
|
|
|
$
|
43.20
|
|
|
$
|
34.57
|
|
Total fair value of awards vested
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-Based RSUs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair
value of awards granted
|
|
$
|
55.17
|
|
|
$
|
43.14
|
|
|
$
|
34.33
|
|
Total fair value of awards vested
(millions)
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Profit
Sharing Retirement Savings Plans
The Company sponsors two defined contribution benefit plans
covering substantially all eligible U.S. employees not
covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The plans include
a savings plan feature under Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code. The Company makes discretionary contributions to
the plans and contributes an amount equal to 50% of the first 6%
of salary contributed by an employee.
Under the terms of the plans, a participant is 100% vested in
Company matching and discretionary contributions after five
years of credited service. Contributions under these plans
approximated $4 million, $5 million and
$4 million in Fiscal 2007, Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal 2005,
respectively.
Supplemental
Retirement Plan
The Company has a non-qualified supplemental retirement plan for
certain highly compensated employees whose benefits under the
401(k) profit sharing retirement savings plans are expected to
be constrained by the operation of certain Internal Revenue Code
limitations. These supplemental benefits vest over time and the
compensation expense related to these benefits is recognized
over the vesting period. The amounts accrued under these plans
were $26 million and $25 million as of March 31,
2007 and April 1, 2006, respectively, and are reflected in
other non-current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. Total compensation expense related to these
benefits was $3 million, $5 million and
$4 million in Fiscal 2007, Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal 2005,
respectively.
Deferred
Compensation Plans
The Company has deferred compensation arrangements for certain
key executives which generally provide for payments upon
retirement, death or termination of employment. The amounts
accrued under these plans were $2 million and
$1 million as of March 31, 2007 and April 1,
2006, respectively, and are reflected in other non-current
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Total compensation expense related to these compensation
arrangements was $0.3 million for Fiscal 2007,
$0.3 million for Fiscal 2006 and $0.4 million for
Fiscal 2005. The Company funds a portion of these obligations
through the establishment of trust accounts on behalf of the
executives participating in the plans. The trust accounts are
reflected in other assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
F-41
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Union
Pension Plan
The Company participates in a multi-employer pension plan and is
required to make contributions to the Union of Needletrades
Industrial and Textile Employees (Union) for dues
based on wages paid to union employees. A portion of these dues
is allocated by the Union to a retirement fund which provides
defined benefits to substantially all unionized workers. The
Company does not participate in the management of the plan and
has not been furnished with information with respect to the type
of benefits provided, vested and non-vested benefits or assets.
Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as
amended, an employer, upon withdrawal from or termination of a
multi-employer plan, is required to continue funding its
proportionate share of the plans unfunded vested benefits.
Such withdrawal liability was assumed in conjunction with the
acquisition of certain assets from a non-affiliated licensee.
The Company has no current intention of withdrawing from the
plan.
International
Defined Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors certain defined benefit plans at
international locations, which are not considered to be material
individually and in the aggregate as of March 31, 2007.
Pension benefits under these plans are based on formulas that
reflect the employees years of service and compensation
levels during their employment period.
The Company has three reportable segments: Wholesale, Retail and
Licensing. Such segments offer a variety of products through
different channels of distribution. The Wholesale segment
consists of womens, mens and childrens
apparel, accessories and related products which are sold to
major department stores, specialty stores, golf and pro shops
and the Companys owned and licensed retail stores in the
U.S. and overseas. The Retail segment consists of the
Companys worldwide retail operations, which sell products
through its full-price and factory stores, as well as Polo.com,
its
e-commerce
website. The stores and website sell products purchased from the
Companys licensees, suppliers and Wholesale segment. The
Licensing segment generates revenues from royalties earned on
the sale of the Companys apparel, home and other products
internationally and domestically through licensing alliances.
The licensing agreements grant the licensees rights to use the
Companys various trademarks in connection with the
manufacture and sale of designated products in specified
geographical areas for specified periods.
The accounting policies of the Companys segments are
consistent with those described in Note 3. Sales and
transfers between segments are recorded at cost and treated as
transfers of inventory. All intercompany revenues are eliminated
in consolidation and are not reviewed when evaluating segment
performance. Each segments performance is evaluated based
upon operating income before restructuring charges and certain
one-time items, such as legal charges. Corporate overhead
expenses (exclusive of expenses for senior management, overall
branding-related expenses and certain other corporate-related
expenses) are allocated to the segments based upon specific
usage or other allocation methods.
Net revenues and operating income for each segment are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
2,315.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,942.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,712.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
1,743.2
|
|
|
|
1,558.6
|
|
|
|
1,348.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
236.3
|
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
|
|
244.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,295.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,746.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,305.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
477.8
|
|
|
$
|
398.3
|
|
|
$
|
299.7
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
224.2
|
|
|
|
140.0
|
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
141.6
|
|
|
|
153.5
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
843.6
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
542.0
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses
|
|
|
(183.4
|
)
|
|
|
(159.1
|
)
|
|
|
(133.8
|
)
|
Unallocated legal and
restructuring
charges(a)
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
|
|
(108.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$
|
652.6
|
|
|
$
|
516.6
|
|
|
$
|
299.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Restructuring charges of
$4.6 million for Fiscal 2007 and $9.0 million for
Fiscal 2006 are primarily related to the Retail segment.
Restructuring charges of $2.3 million for Fiscal 2005 are
primarily related to the Wholesale segment. See Note 11 for
further discussion.
|
Depreciation and amortization expense and capital expenditures
for each segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
47.0
|
|
|
$
|
39.4
|
|
|
$
|
23.6
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
53.0
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
144.7
|
|
|
$
|
127.0
|
|
|
$
|
102.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
44.6
|
|
|
$
|
28.7
|
|
|
$
|
50.6
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
87.8
|
|
|
|
77.5
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
184.0
|
|
|
$
|
158.6
|
|
|
$
|
174.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-43
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Total assets for each segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$
|
1,756.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,657.1
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
909.7
|
|
|
|
786.5
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
190.2
|
|
|
|
189.4
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
902.1
|
|
|
|
455.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,758.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,088.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues and long-lived assets by geographic location of the
reporting subsidiary are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Canada
|
|
$
|
3,452.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,032.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,581.2
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
767.9
|
|
|
|
627.7
|
|
|
|
579.2
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
Other regions
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,295.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,746.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,305.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Canada
|
|
$
|
474.5
|
|
|
$
|
429.6
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
Other regions
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
629.8
|
|
|
$
|
548.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
In the ordinary course of conducting its business, the Company
periodically enters into transactions with other entities or
people that are considered related parties.
The Company receives royalty payments, pursuant to a licensing
agreement with Impact 21 that allows Impact 21 to sell high
quality apparel and related merchandise in Japan using certain
of the Companys trademarks. The Company has an
approximately 20% interest in Impact 21, which is accounted
for under the equity method of accounting. Royalty payments
received under this arrangement were approximately
$34 million in Fiscal 2007, $34 million in Fiscal 2006
and $34 million in Fiscal 2005. See Note 5 for further
discussion of the Companys Japanese Business Acquisitions
that occurred in May 2007.
F-44
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition, Mr. Ralph Lauren, the Companys Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, sometimes uses the services of
certain employees of the Company for non-Company related
purposes. Mr. Lauren reimburses the Company for the direct
expenses incurred in connection with those services, including
an allocation of such employees salaries and benefits.
Such costs and related reimbursements were less than
$1 million in the aggregate in each of the three fiscal
years presented.
|
|
22.
|
Additional
Financial Information
|
Cash
Interest and Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
244.6
|
|
|
$
|
165.1
|
|
|
$
|
107.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
Transactions
Significant non-cash investing activities included the
capitalization of fixed assets and recognition of related
obligations, including those under certain leasing arrangements
in the amount of $45 million for Fiscal 2007 and
$46 million for Fiscal 2006. In addition, significant
non-cash investing activities included the non-cash allocation
of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
in the acquisition of the 50% minority interest in RL Media in
Fiscal 2007, the acquisition of the Polo Jeans and Footwear
Businesses in Fiscal 2006, and the acquisition of the
Childrenswear Business in Fiscal 2005. See Note 5 for
further discussion of acquisitions.
There were no other significant non-cash financing and investing
activities for Fiscal 2007, Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal 2005.
Licensing-related
Transactions
Eyewear
Licensing Agreement
In February 2006, the Company announced that it had entered into
a ten-year exclusive licensing agreement with Luxottica Group,
S.p.A. and affiliates (Luxottica) for the design,
production, sale and distribution of prescription frames and
sunglasses under the Polo Ralph Lauren brand (the Eyewear
Licensing Agreement).
The Eyewear Licensing Agreement took effect on January 1,
2007 after the Companys pre-existing licensing agreement
with another licensee expired. In early January, the Company
received a prepayment of approximately $180 million, net of
certain tax withholdings, in consideration of the annual minimum
royalty and design-services fees to be earned over the life of
the contract. The prepayment is non-refundable, except with
respect to certain breaches of the agreement by the Company, in
which case only the unearned portion of the prepayment as
determined based on the specific terms of the agreement would be
required to be repaid. The prepayment was recorded by the
Company as deferred income and will be recognized in earnings
when earned in accordance with the terms of the agreement based
upon the higher of (a) contractually guaranteed minimum
royalty levels and (b) estimates of sales and royalty data
received from the licensee.
Underwear
Licensing Agreement
The Company licensed the right to manufacture and sell
Chaps-branded underwear under a long-term license agreement,
which was scheduled to expire in December 2009. During Fiscal
2007, the Company and the licensee agreed to terminate the
licensing and related design-services agreements. In connection
with this agreement, the Company received a portion of the
minimum royalty and design-service fees due to it under the
underlying agreements on an accelerated basis. The approximate
$8 million of proceeds received by the Company has been
recognized as licensing revenue in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements for Fiscal 2007.
F-45
MANAGEMENTS
RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The management of Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation is responsible
for the preparation, objectivity and integrity of the
consolidated financial statements and other information
contained in this Annual Report. The consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States and
include some amounts that are based on managements
informed judgments and best estimates.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, has audited these consolidated financial
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and have
expressed herein their unqualified opinion on those financial
statements.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which oversees
all of the Companys financial reporting process on behalf
of the Board of Directors, consists solely of independent
directors, meets with the independent registered accountants,
internal auditors and management periodically to review their
respective activities and the discharge of their respective
responsibilities. Both the independent registered public
accountants and the internal auditors have unrestricted access
to the Audit Committee, with or without management, to discuss
the scope and results of their audits and any recommendations
regarding the system of internal controls.
May 30, 2007
|
|
|
/s/ RALPH LAUREN
|
|
/s/ TRACEY T. TRAVIS
|
|
|
|
Ralph Lauren
|
|
Tracey T. Travis
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
F-46
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of March 31, 2007 and April 1,
2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended March 31, 2007. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of March 31, 2007 and April 1, 2006, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended March 31, 2007, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective April 2, 2006, the Company elected
application of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements. As discussed in Note 4 to the
consolidated financial statements, effective April 2, 2006,
the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2007, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
May 30, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting and an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
May 30, 2007
F-47
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report of Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, that Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and
subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,
2007, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of March 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company has maintained, in
all material aspects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2007, based on the criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
March 31, 2007, of the Company and our report dated May 30,
2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial
statements and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
Companys elected application of Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, and
the Companys adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
May 30, 2007
F-48
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
SELECTED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following table sets forth selected historical financial
information as of the dates and for the periods indicated.
The consolidated statement of operations data for each of the
three fiscal years in the period ended March 31, 2007 and
the consolidated balance sheet data at March 31, 2007 and
April 1, 2006 has been derived from, and should be read in
conjunction with, the audited financial statements and other
financial information presented elsewhere herein. The
consolidated statement of operations data for each of the two
fiscal years in the period ended April 3, 2004 and the
consolidated balance sheet data at April 2, 2005,
April 3, 2004 and March 29, 2003 has been derived from
audited financial statements not included herein. Capitalized
terms are as defined and described in the consolidated financial
statements or elsewhere herein. The historical results are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any
future period.
The selected financial information for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 reflects the acquisition of the remaining
50% equity interest of RL Media and the adoption of
FAS 123R. The selected financial information for the fiscal
year ended April 1, 2006 reflects the acquisition of the
Polo Jeans Business effective in February 2006 and the
acquisition of the Footwear Business effective in July 2005. The
selected financial information for the fiscal year ended
April 2, 2005 reflects the acquisition of the Childrenswear
Business effective in July 2004. The selected financial
information reflects the consolidation of RL Media effective as
of the end of Fiscal 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
April 3,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004(a)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
4,059.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,501.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,060.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,380.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,189.3
|
|
Licensing revenues
|
|
|
236.3
|
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
|
|
244.7
|
|
|
|
268.8
|
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
4,295.4
|
|
|
|
3,746.3
|
|
|
|
3,305.4
|
|
|
|
2,649.7
|
|
|
|
2,439.3
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,336.2
|
|
|
|
2,022.4
|
|
|
|
1,684.5
|
|
|
|
1,323.3
|
|
|
|
1,207.6
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense
|
|
|
(144.7
|
)
|
|
|
(127.0
|
)
|
|
|
(102.1
|
)
|
|
|
(85.6
|
)
|
|
|
80.6
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
(14.4
|
)
|
Operating
income(b)
|
|
|
652.6
|
|
|
|
516.6
|
|
|
|
299.7
|
|
|
|
270.9
|
|
|
|
290.9
|
|
Interest income/(expense), net
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
400.9
|
|
|
$
|
308.0
|
|
|
$
|
190.4
|
|
|
$
|
169.2
|
|
|
$
|
175.7
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
3.84
|
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
|
$
|
1.79
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
3.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
Average common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
104.4
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
101.5
|
|
|
|
99.0
|
|
|
|
98.3
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
107.6
|
|
|
|
107.2
|
|
|
|
104.1
|
|
|
|
101.0
|
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Fiscal year consists of
53 weeks.
|
|
(b) |
|
Operating income has been reduced
by litigation-related charges of approximately $3 million
in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, $7 million in
the fiscal year ended April 1, 2006, and $106 million
in the fiscal year ended April 2, 2005. Impairment charges
related to retail assets reduced operating income by
approximately $11 million in the fiscal year ended
April 1, 2006.
|
F-49
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
SELECTED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
April 3,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
563.9
|
|
|
$
|
285.7
|
|
|
$
|
350.5
|
|
|
$
|
352.3
|
|
|
$
|
343.6
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
1,045.6
|
|
|
|
535.0
|
|
|
|
791.4
|
|
|
|
782.0
|
|
|
|
662.4
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,758.0
|
|
|
|
3,088.7
|
|
|
|
2,726.7
|
|
|
|
2,297.6
|
|
|
|
2,052.4
|
|
Total debt (including current
maturities of debt)
|
|
|
398.8
|
|
|
|
280.4
|
|
|
|
291.0
|
|
|
|
277.3
|
|
|
|
349.4
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,334.9
|
|
|
|
2,049.6
|
|
|
|
1,675.7
|
|
|
|
1,415.4
|
|
|
|
1,205.6
|
|
F-50
POLO
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION
The following table sets forth the quarterly financial
information of the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Periods Ended
|
|
|
|
July 1,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
953.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,166.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,143.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,031.3
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
531.5
|
|
|
|
632.6
|
|
|
|
614.0
|
|
|
|
558.1
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
137.0
|
|
|
|
110.5
|
|
|
|
73.2
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Periods Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
751.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,027.3
|
|
|
$
|
995.5
|
|
|
$
|
971.6
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
414.4
|
|
|
|
551.5
|
|
|
|
531.5
|
|
|
|
525.0
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
90.6
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
F-51