SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
Registration statement pursuant to Section 12 (b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
or |
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the financial year ended: 31 December 2003 |
or |
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from: __________ to __________ |
Commission file number: 1-10533 | Commission file number: 0-20122 |
Rio Tinto plc | Rio Tinto Limited |
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) | (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) |
England and Wales | Victoria, Australia |
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) | (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) |
6 St James’s Square | Level 33, 55 Collins Street |
London, SW1Y 4LD, England | Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Address of principal executive offices) |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | Name of
each exchange on which registered |
Title of each class |
American Depositary Shares* | New York Stock Exchange |
None | |
Ordinary Shares of 10p each** | New York Stock Exchange |
||
* Evidenced
by American Depository Receipts. Each American Depository Share Represents
four Rio Tinto plc Ordinary Shares of 10p each. ** Not for trading, but only in connection with the listing of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of each class | Title of each class |
None | American Depositary Shares*** |
Ordinary Shares | |
*** Evidenced by American Depository Receipts. Each American Depository Share represents four Rio Tinto Limited Ordinary Shares. |
Securities
for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d)
of the Act:
|
|
None | None
|
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
Title of each class | Number | Number | Title of each class | |||||||
Ordinary Shares of 10p each | 1,066,674,301 | 499,058,420 | Shares | |||||||
DLC Dividend Share of 10p | 1 | 1 | DLC Dividend Share | |||||||
Special Voting Share of 10p | 1 | 1 | Special Voting Share |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
Yes No
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrants have elected to follow:
Item 17 Item 18
EXPLANATORY NOTE
The Rio Tinto Group is a
leading international mining group, combining Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto
Limited in a dual listed companies (‘DLC’) merger that has
created a single economic enterprise, nevertheless both companies remain
separate legal entities with separate share listings and registrars,
and with separate ADR programmes. Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited prepare annual reports and financial statements for the combined group that are presented to their shareholders as their consolidated accounts in accordance with both United Kingdom and Australian legislation and regulations. The current such document is the 2003 Annual report and financial statements and is referred to in this annual report on Form 20-F as the “2003 Annual report”. They also prepare combined annual reports on Form 20-F that are filed with the SEC in accordance with United States legislation and regulations. |
||
The following have been filed as part of this annual report on Form 20-F: | ||
| The 2003 Annual report, as modified for purposes of filing with this annual report on Form 20-F. Data included on pages 22 to 24 of the 2003 Annual report relating to mineral resources in compliance with the requirements of the Australian Stock Exchange has been intentionally omitted from this annual report on Form 20-F because it conflicts with the requirements of SEC Industry Guide 7. Also included on pages 81 to 133 of the 2003 Annual report are the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group formed through the DLC merger. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK GAAP that recognises the DLC merger as a merger of economic interests and in order to present a true and fair view of the Rio Tinto Group the principles of merger accounting have been adopted in accordance with FRS 6. The Profit and loss account and the Audit report on pages 82 and 135 respectively of the 2003 Annual report are not in accordance with the SEC rules and so replacement pages have been substituted. The replacement page 82 also includes a condensed income statement in the format prescribed by the SEC but does not change the reported state of affairs of the Rio Tinto Group or of its profit and cash flows. |
| The 2003 Annual report Appendix. For purposes of this annual report on Form 20-F the separate consolidated financial statements of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group, prepared on the basis of the legal ownership of the various operations within each part of the Group, have been presented in the 2003 Annual report Appendix. However, the DLC merger of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited has the effect of placing the shareholders of each company in substantially the same position as if they held shares in a single economic enterprise and therefore the directors consider that the combined financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group provide shareholders with the most meaningful representation of the state of affairs and of the profit and cash flows. |
|
Only (i) the information
that has been referenced in the answers to the Items of this annual report
on Form 20-F, and (ii) the Exhibits, shall be deemed to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for any purpose, including
incorporation by reference into any documents filed by Rio Tinto plc, Rio
Tinto Limited or Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited pursuant to the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, which purport to incorporate by reference this
annual report on Form 20-F. Any information herein which is not referenced
in the answers to the Items of this annual report on Form 20-F, or the
Exhibits themselves, shall not be deemed to be so incorporated by reference. The information contained in the 2003 Annual report and the 2003 Annual report Appendix has not materially changed since 20 February 2004, but see Item 8 for a discussion of a post balance sheet event. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 2
RIO TINTO
PART I
Item 1. Identity
of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item
2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Selected consolidated financial
data
The following selected consolidated
financial data has been derived from the consolidated financial statements
of the Rio Tinto Group presented elsewhere herein, restated where appropriate
to accord with the current accounting policies and presentations. The selected
consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with, and qualified
in their entirety by reference to, the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F.
The consolidated
financial statements are prepared in accordance with UK GAAP which differs in
certain respects from US GAAP. Details of the principal differences between UK
GAAP and US GAAP are set out on pages 137 to 147 of the 2003 Annual report and
in note 42 on pages A-59 to A-74 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix.
Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
Income
Statement Data For the years ending 31 December |
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||
Amounts in accordance with UK GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated turnover | 9,228 | 8,443 | 8,152 | 7,875 | 7,197 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit (a) | 1,496 | 831 | 1,562 | 2,188 | 1,631 | |||||||||||
Net earnings (a) | 1,508 | 651 | 1,079 | 1,507 | 1,282 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit per share (US cents) | 108.6 | 60.3 | 113.6 | 159.4 | 119.1 | |||||||||||
Earnings per share (US cents) | 109.5 | 47.3 | 78.5 | 109.8 | 93.6 | |||||||||||
Dividends per share (US cents) (b) | 64.0 | 60.0 | 59.0 | 57.5 | 55.0 | |||||||||||
Dividends per share (pence) (b) | 37.13 | 37.47 | 41.68 | 38.87 | 34.23 | |||||||||||
Dividends per share (Australian cents) (b) | 89.70 | 105.93 | 115.27 | 102.44 | 87.11 | |||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares (millions) (b) | 1,378 | 1,377 | 1,375 | 1,373 | 1,370 |
Diluted earnings per share figures are 0.2 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures shown for 2003 and 2001, and approximately 0.1 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for 2002 and other years.
Amounts in accordance with US GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated turnover (c) | 9,211 | 8,447 | 8,157 | 7,859 | 7,197 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit (e) (g) | 1,041 | 746 | 1,821 | 1,948 | 1,407 | |||||||||||
Net earnings (e) | 1,977 | 581 | 1,038 | 1,174 | 958 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit per share (US cents) (e) (g) | 75.5 | 54.2 | 132.4 | 141.9 | 102.7 | |||||||||||
Earnings per share (US cents) (e) | 143.5 | 42.2 | 75.5 | 85.5 | 69.9 |
Diluted earnings per share figures are 0.2 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for 2003 and, approximately 0.1 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for other years.
Balance
Sheet Data at 31 December |
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||
Amounts in accordance with UK GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets (e) | 24,081 | 20,204 | 19,540 | 19,367 | 15,533 | |||||||||||
Share capital / premium | 2,869 | 2,580 | 2,486 | 2,535 | 2,784 | |||||||||||
Shareholders' funds (net assets) (e) | 10,037 | 7,462 | 7,043 | 7,211 | 6,963 | |||||||||||
Amounts in accordance with US GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets | 26,959 | 22,600 | 22,102 | 21,530 | 17,469 | |||||||||||
Share capital / premium | 2,869 | 2,580 | 2,486 | 2,535 | 2,784 | |||||||||||
Shareholders' funds (net assets) (e) | 12,044 | 9,517 | 9,571 | 9,812 | 9,928 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 3
Rio Tinto plc part of Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
Income
Statement Data for the years ending 31 December |
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||
Amounts in accordance with UK GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated turnover | 4,032 | 3,929 | 3,723 | 3,993 | 4,016 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit (a) | 368 | (19 | ) | 137 | 915 | 779 | ||||||||||
Net earnings (a) | 956 | 195 | 491 | 1,064 | 970 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit per share (US cents) | 34.5 | (1.8 | ) | 12.9 | 86.0 | 73.4 | ||||||||||
Earnings per share (US cents) | 89.7 | 18.3 | 46.1 | 100.1 | 91.4 | |||||||||||
Dividends per share (US cents) (b) | 64.0 | 60.0 | 59.0 | 57.5 | 55.0 | |||||||||||
Dividends per share (pence) (b) | 37.13 | 37.47 | 41.68 | 38.87 | 34.23 | |||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares (millions) (b) | 1,066 | 1,065 | 1,064 | 1,063 | 1,061 |
Diluted earnings per share figures are approximately 0.1 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for all years.
Amounts in accordance with US GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated turnover (c) | 4,012 | 3,929 | 3,727 | 3,982 | 4,016 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit (e) (g) | (7 | ) | (481 | ) | 548 | 747 | 594 | |||||||||
Net earnings (e) | 949 | (206 | ) | 618 | 820 | 669 | ||||||||||
Group operating profit per share (US cents) (e) (g) | (0.7 | ) | (45.2 | ) | 51.5 | 70.2 | 56.0 | |||||||||
Earnings per share (US cents) (e) | 89.0 | (19.3 | ) | 58.1 | 77.1 | 63.1 |
Diluted earnings per share figures are approximately 0.1 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for all years.
Balance
Sheet Data at 31 December |
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||
Amounts in accordance with UK GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets (e) | 13,708 | 12,606 | 11,921 | 11,948 | 11,390 | |||||||||||
Share capital / premium | 1,784 | 1,764 | 1,754 | 1,741 | 1,882 | |||||||||||
Shareholders’ funds (net assets) (e) | 7,343 | 5,899 | 5,902 | 6,325 | 5,558 | |||||||||||
Amounts in accordance with US GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets | 15,180 | 13,941 | 13,735 | 13,557 | 13,408 | |||||||||||
Share capital / premium | 1,784 | 1,764 | 1,754 | 1,741 | 1,882 | |||||||||||
Shareholders’ funds (net assets) (e) | 8,931 | 7,697 | 8,371 | 8,693 | 8,222 |
Rio Tinto Limited part of Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
Income
Statement Data for the years ending 31 December |
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||
Amounts in accordance with UK GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated turnover | 5,196 | 4,514 | 4,429 | 3,882 | 3,181 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit (a) | 1,128 | 855 | 1,425 | 1,273 | 852 | |||||||||||
Net earnings (a) | 884 | 736 | 942 | 771 | 606 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit per share (US cents) | 226.1 | 171.3 | 286.1 | 235.7 | 141.8 | |||||||||||
Earnings per share (US cents) | 177.2 | 147.6 | 189.0 | 142.8 | 100.8 | |||||||||||
Dividends per share (US cents) (b) | 64.0 | 60.0 | 59.0 | 57.5 | 55.0 | |||||||||||
Dividends per share (Australian cents) (b) | 89.70 | 105.93 | 115.27 | 102.44 | 87.11 | |||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares (millions) (b) | 499 | 499 | 498 | 540 | 601 |
Diluted earnings per share figures are approximately 0.1 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for all years.
Amounts in accordance with US GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated turnover (c) | 5,199 | 4,518 | 4,430 | 3,873 | 3,181 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit (e) (g) | 1,048 | 1,231 | 1,273 | 1,201 | 813 | |||||||||||
Net earnings (e) | 1,647 | 1,267 | 671 | 614 | 562 | |||||||||||
Group operating profit per share (US cents) (e) (g) | 210.0 | 246.7 | 255.6 | 222.4 | 135.3 | |||||||||||
Earnings per share (US cents) (e) | 330.1 | 254.0 | 134.6 | 113.9 | 93.5 |
Diluted earnings per share figures are approximately 0.1 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for all years.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 4
Balance
Sheet Data at 31 December |
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||
Amounts in accordance with UK GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets (e) | 13,542 | 10,382 | 9,977 | 9,542 | 5,743 | |||||||||||
Share capital / premium | 1,280 | 964 | 865 | 939 | 1,276 | |||||||||||
Shareholders' funds (net assets) (e) (f) | 4,324 | 2,510 | 1,828 | 1,420 | 2,669 | |||||||||||
Amounts in accordance with US GAAP | ||||||||||||||||
(US$ millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets | 15,234 | 11,609 | 10,770 | 10,236 | 6,021 | |||||||||||
Share capital / premium | 1,280 | 964 | 865 | 939 | 1,276 | |||||||||||
Shareholders' funds (net assets) (e) | 4,996 | 2,922 | 1,920 | 1,795 | 3,233 |
(a) | In 2003 Rio Tinto Group net earnings under UK GAAP are stated after exceptional gains totalling US$126 million which arose on the sale of certain operations by Rio Tinto Limited. |
In 2002 Rio Tinto Group operating profit under UK GAAP is stated after charging US$962 million for asset write downs, of which US$529 million relates to Rio Tinto plc and US$433 million relates to Rio Tinto Limited. In addition, group operating profit for 2002 includes US$116 million for environmental remediation charges which all relate to Rio Tinto plc. In 2002 net earnings for the Rio Tinto Group include US$763 million for asset write downs of which US$623 million relates to Rio Tinto plc and US$225 million relates to Rio Tinto Limited. In addition the Group’s net earnings for 2002 include US$116 million for environmental remediation charges which all relate to Rio Tinto plc. |
In 2001 Rio Tinto Group operating profit under UK GAAP is stated after charging US$715 million for exceptional asset write downs, of which US$644 million relates to Rio Tinto plc and US$71 million relates to Rio Tinto Limited. In 2001 Rio Tinto Group net earnings under UK GAAP are after charges of US$583 million for asset write downs of which US$551 million relates to Rio Tinto plc and US$52 million relates to Rio Tinto Limited. |
Under UK GAAP asset write downs and the environmental remediation charges are classified as ‘exceptional' but none of these items would be classified as ‘extraordinary’ items under US GAAP. | |
(b) | These figures are the same under both UK and US GAAP. |
(c) | A cumulative adjustment was made in 2000 to reflect the application of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (‘SAB101’) Revenue recognition in financial statements. The effect of SAB 101 is described on page A-62. |
(d) | The results for all years relate wholly to continuing operations. |
(e) | Total assets and shareholders’ funds under UK GAAP have been restated for all years to reflect the implementation of FRS 19 Deferred Tax. The application of FRS 19 did not impact significantly on net earnings and, accordingly, net earnings have not been restated. 2001 and 2000 Rio Tinto Group, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited operating profit, net earnings and shareholders’ funds under US GAAP have been restated for prior years to reflect the implementation of FAS 123 Accounting for Stock Based Compensation in 2002. |
(f) | The decrease in Rio Tinto Limited shareholders’ funds in 2000 reflects the buy back of 91,000,000 shares from Rio Tinto plc in that year. |
(g) | Under US GAAP the impact of exchange differences on US dollar debt and the mark to market of certain derivative contracts are excluded from operating profit but are included in net earnings. 1999-2002 Group operating profit and Group operating profit per share figures under US GAAP have been restated to reflect this. |
Risk factors
Risk factors have been discussed
on page 7 of the 2003 Annual report.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 5
Cautionary statement about
forward looking statements
To come within the 'Safe Harbor'
provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, Rio Tinto is providing the following cautionary statement:
This
document contains certain forward looking statements with respect to the
financial condition, results of operations and business of the Rio Tinto
Group. The words “intend”, “aim”, “project”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “plan”, “believes”, “expects”, “may”, “should”, “will”,
or similar expressions, commonly identify such forward looking statements.
Examples of forward looking statements in this annual report on Form 20-F
include those regarding estimated reserves, anticipated production or construction
commencement dates, costs, outputs and productive lives of assets or similar
factors. Forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties,
assumptions and other factors set forth in this document that are beyond
the Group’s control. For example, future reserves will be based in
part on market prices that may vary significantly from current levels. These
may materially affect the timing and feasibility of particular developments.
Other factors include the ability to produce and transport products profitably,
the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on market prices and operating
costs, and activities by governmental authorities, such as changes in taxation
or regulation, and political uncertainty.
In
light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, actual results could
be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by these
forward looking statements. The Group does not undertake any obligation to
publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result
of new information or future events. The Group cannot guarantee that its
forward looking statements will not differ materially from actual results.
Item
4. Information on the Company
Information
on the Rio Tinto Group has been set out on pages 9 to 21 and on pages 25
to 31 of the 2003
Annual report and in notes 26 and 27 on pages A-34 to A-38 in the 2003 Annual
report Appendix. The disclosures in connection with ore reserves are
supplemented with alternative estimates for purposes of US reporting on page
147 of the 2003 Annual report and which has been repeated on page A-75 in
the 2003 Annual report Appendix. A description of Rio Tinto’s
dual listed companies structure has been set out on pages 77 to 79 of the
2003 Annual report and its principal subsidiaries have been listed in note
31 on page 118 of the 2003 Annual report.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Individual listed company
information: Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of Rio Tinto
Group
In December 1995 the shareholders
of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited approved the terms of a dual listed
companies (‘DLC’) merger that was designed to place the shareholders
of both companies in substantially the same position as if they held shares
in a single enterprise. UK GAAP recognises the DLC merger as a combination
of economic interests and in order to present a true and fair view of the
Rio Tinto Group the principles of merger accounting have been adopted in
accordance with FRS 6. Accordingly, the Rio Tinto Group’s Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects have been presented on a combined basis
on pages 32 to 56 in the 2003 Annual report. Set out below is a separate
discussion and analysis relating to each of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto
Limited parts of the Rio Tinto Group.
Rio Tinto plc part of Rio Tinto Group
2003 compared with 2002
Rio Tinto plc's net sales revenue
(referred to as consolidated turnover in the financial statements) was US$4,032
million (2002: US$3,929 million). The three per cent increase in 2003 is
largely due to the commencement of sales at Diavik.
Profit
on ordinary activities before interest and tax was US$1,512 million. The
corresponding figure for 2002 was US$602 million lower, but suffered from
exceptional charges of US$755 million. Iron and Titanium profits were lower
in 2003 as a result of the weak US dollar, soft market conditions and the
write down of a customer receivable. The pretax profit impact of reduced
volumes at Kennecott Utah Copper was partly offset by benefits from higher
copper prices. A loss at Rössing reflected lower prices and adverse
exchange rates. 2003 profits also suffered from increased pension finance
costs, resulting from the decrease in fund asset values. However, profits
benefited in 2003 from Diavik's first year of operation; and there was an
increase in operating profit contributed by joint ventures following expansion
of capacity at Escondida.
In
2003, net interest payable decreased to US$138 million (2002: US$156 million),
as a result of lower net debt and the reduced interest rates. Interest rates
for the majority of Rio Tinto plc's borrowings are based on 3 month LIBOR,
which averaged 1.2 per cent in 2003 and 1.8 per cent in 2002.
The
effective tax rate was 26.1 per cent in 2003. The reduction from the 2002
tax rate of 61.8 per cent is largely due to the effect of exceptional items.
Excluding these, the tax rate in 2003, at 27.1 per cent is lower than the
30.7 per cent for 2002 as a result of lower tax payments in the US. The 2003
exceptional gain of US$47 million attracted no tax charge. In 2002 tax relief
recognised on the exceptional losses of US$755 million was US$9 million.
Net
earnings of US$956 million compare with US$195 million in 2002. The increase
of US$761 million includes the effect of exceptional charges of US$739 million,
in 2002, in contrast with gains of US$47 million in 2003.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 6
Total
cash flow from operations was US$1,710 million (2002: US$1,976 million).
Although 2003 operating profit was higher than in 2002, this largely
resulted from the influence of exceptional non-cash charges. Capital expenditure and financial investment in 2003 was US$1,097 million (2002: US$1,205 million). The decrease was largely due to: |
|
| An increase in net funds advanced to Rio Tinto plc by Rio Tinto Limited of US$5 million (2002: decrease of US$87 million). |
| A reduction in the purchase of property plant and equipment following the completion of the Diavik project in January 2003. |
| The acquisition by a subsidiary company of Rio Tinto plc, of US$500 million of redeemable preference shares in a subsidiary company of Rio Tinto Limited. |
| The purchase, in 2002, of US$304 million of US treasury bonds as security for the deferred consideration on the acquisition of the North Jacobs Ranch reserves. |
The net cash inflow from
acquisitions and disposals of US$1,209 million in 2003 reflects deferred
payment by Rio Tinto Limited for the buy back in 2000 of some of its
shares from Rio Tinto plc. Net debt fell from US$2,625 million in 2002
to US$1,842 million in 2003. Shareholders’ funds increased to US$7,343 million at 31 December 2003 (31 December 2002: US$5,899 million), largely due to retained profit and exchange gains. |
2002 compared with 2001
Rio Tinto plc's net sales revenue
(referred to as consolidated turnover in the financial statements) was US$3,929
million in 2002, six per cent higher than in 2001. The increase primarily
reflected higher volumes at Utah Copper and higher average prices at Kennecott
Energy. Profit on ordinary activities before interest and tax was US$910
million compared with US$1,253 million in 2001. Exceptional asset write downs
reflected in this number were US$639 million in 2002 against US$671 million
in 2001. US$480 million of the write downs in 2002 and US$531 million of
the write downs in 2001 related to Utah Copper. 2002 exceptional asset write
downs also included US$89 million relating to Rio Tinto Limited's write down
of the Iron Ore Company of Canada Inc. The remainder of the write downs in
2001 related to gold producing assets. In addition, in 2002, there was an
exceptional charge of US$116 million relating to environmental remediation
works at Utah Copper. None of these exceptional charges would qualify as
extraordinary items under US GAAP. In addition to the above exceptional items,
the reduction in profit before interest and tax reflected the absence of
the US$54 million gain on disposal of Norzink in 2001, adverse exchange rates,
inflation and adverse changes in other corporate items including pension
costs.
Interest
rates for the majority of Rio Tinto plc's borrowings are based on 3 month
LIBOR, which averaged 1.8 per cent in 2002 and 3.8 per cent in 2001. Net
interest payable was US$69 million lower than in 2001 as the lower interest
rate more than offset the effect of increased net debt in the year.
The
effective tax rate was 30.7 per cent (2001: 30.1 per cent) before exceptional
charges and 61.8 per cent (2001: 38.5 per cent) after exceptional charges.
The 2001 effective tax rate before exceptional charges benefited from the
US$54 million non taxable gain on the sale of Norzink.
Net
earnings of US$195 million (2001: US$491 million) were reduced in both years
by the exceptional charges referred to above. Adjusted net earnings at US$934
million (2001: US$1,042 million) exclude the exceptional charges and are
lower as a result of the factors noted above.
Total
cash flow from operations was US$1,976 million compared with US$1,532 million
in 2001. Reductions in working capital in the period largely reversed the
increases in 2001. Dividends from associates increased, reflecting a US$146
million dividend paid by Rio Tinto Limited to Rio Tinto plc on the DLC Dividend
Share.
Capital
expenditure and financial investment remained around the same level as in
2001. However, 2002 includes the purchase of US$304 million of US treasury
bonds held as security for the deferred consideration on the North Jacobs
Ranch reserves acquired during the period, which is payable over the next
four years. A net US$87 million of funds were advanced to Rio Tinto Limited
companies in 2002 which compares with an advance of US$399 million in 2001.
The
net cash inflow from acquisitions and disposals of US$104 million in 2002
included the remittance of US$115 million from Rio Tinto Limited in relation
to the buyback of some of its shares from Rio Tinto plc in 2000. Dividends
paid to shareholders were US$108 million higher than in 2001 as a result
of the change in policy for weighting of interim and final dividends announced
in 2001. Net debt increased from US$2,311 million at 31 December 2001 to
US$2,625 million at 31 December 2002 primarily reflecting the cash outflow
before management of liquid resources and financing of US$235 million. Shareholders'
funds were US$5,899 million at the end of 2002 compared with US$5,902 million
at the end of 2001. Retained losses of US$444 million were offset by positive
exchange rate changes, primarily on the Australian dollar, and the impact
of the dividend on the DLC Dividend Share.
Rio Tinto Limited part of Rio Tinto Group
2003 Compared with 2002
Rio Tinto Limited's net sales
revenue (referred to as consolidated turnover in the financial statements)
was US$5,196 million in 2003 (2002: US$4,514 million). The 15 per cent increase
in 2003 is largely due to increased volumes and prices at the Iron Ore operations
and increased prices and smelter output at Comalco. The disposals of Kaltim
Prima Coal and Alumbrera during the year resulted in a reduction in share
of joint ventures' and associates' turnover.
In
2003 profit on ordinary activities before interest and tax was US$1,391 million
(2002: US$1,180 million after exceptional asset write downs of US$433 million).
The weakening of the US dollar against the Australian dollar and Canadian
dollar, in which most of the Group's costs are denominated, reduced profit.
However, 2003 profits benefited from exceptional gains on the disposal of
a subsidiary, a joint venture and an associate, of US$126 million: whereas,
2002 profits were reduced by exceptional losses.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 7
In
2003, net interest payable decreased to US$100 million (2002: US$124 million),
due largely to lower interest rates.
The
effective tax rate in 2003 was 28.7 per cent, which compares with 40.9 per
cent in 2002. However, excluding the effect of exceptional items, the tax
rate was 31.7 per cent in both years. The 2003 exceptional gain of US$126
million attracted no tax charge. In 2002 tax relief recognised on the exceptional
losses of US$433 million was US$42 million.
Profits
attributable to outside interests increased in 2003, primarily because 2002
was impacted by the exceptional asset write downs at IOC.
Net
earnings increased to US$884 million (2002: US$736 million) as a result of
the factors above.
Total
cash flow from operations was similar to 2002 at US$2,053 million (2002:
US$ 2,043 million). The increase in cash flow from operating activities was
offset by a reduction in dividends received from the coal joint ventures
in 2003.
Capital
expenditure and financial investment increased as a result of continued expansion
at Hamersley; and construction of the Comalco Alumina Refinery. During 2003
Rio Tinto Limited remitted US$1,208 million to Rio Tinto plc in respect of
shares that were repurchased in 2000. In addition, a subsidiary of Rio Tinto
Limited, issued US$500 million of redeemable preference shares to a subsidiary
of Rio Tinto plc. The factors mentioned above combined to reduce cash flow
and increase the level of net debt in 2003.
2002 Compared with 2001
Rio Tinto Limited's net sales
revenue was US$4,514 million in 2002, 2 per cent higher than in 2001. The
effect of higher volumes at Argyle and the commencement of West Angelas operations
more than offset the absence of sales from the Forestry operations, which
were disposed of in 2001. Profit on ordinary activities before interest and
tax was US$1,180 million compared with US$1,745 million in 2001. This fall
included the impact of US$433 million of exceptional asset write downs in
2002 compared with US$71 million of exceptional asset write downs in 2001.
The 2002 exceptional asset write down related primarily to the Iron Ore Company
of Canada Inc (IOC). The 2001 asset write down related to some of Rio Tinto
Limited's gold producing assets. The exceptional asset write downs do not
qualify as extraordinary items under US GAAP. The decrease in profit on ordinary
activities before interest and tax also reflected the strengthening of the
Australian dollar against the US dollar, which increased costs, and lower
prices for iron ore and coal.
The
interest charge of US$124 million was US$66 million lower than in 2001.
The
effective tax rate was 31.7 per cent (2001: 33.7 per cent) before exceptional
asset write downs and 40.9 per cent (2001: 34.0 per cent) after exceptional
asset write downs. The effective rate before exceptional asset write downs
in 2002 benefited from reductions in deferred tax provisions brought forward
from prior years.
There
was a credit of US$126 million for amounts attributable to outside shareholders
in 2002 compared to a charge in 2001 of US$72 million. Profits attributable
to outside interests for 2002 are reduced by US$166 million as a result of
exceptional asset write downs. Lower profits at partly owned operations reduced
the amount attributable to outside interests in addition to this impact from
exceptional asset write downs.
Net
earnings at US$736 million were US$206 million below 2001 which reflected
the exceptional asset write downs of US$225 million after tax and minorities.
Total
cash flow from operations increased to US$2,043 million from US$1,992 million
in 2001. Lower operating profits were offset by other favourable movements
including a reduction in inventories as West Angelas came into production
and as a result of an IOC shut down in August. Capital expenditure and financial
investment remained at around the same level as 2001 as increased spending
on the Comalco Alumina Refinery and Hail Creek compensated for the suspension
of expenditure on IOC's Sept-Iles pellet plant and the completion of West
Angelas.
There
were net disposals of US$138 million in 2002. The disposals largely related
to units acquired with Peabody's Australian coal businesses in 2001. Acquisitions
primarily related to an increase in the Group's interest in lines 1 and 2
at Boyne Smelters.
Dividends
paid in 2002 included a dividend of US$146 million paid to Rio Tinto plc
in relation to the DLC Dividend Share.
Rio
Tinto Limited received loans of US$87 million from Rio Tinto plc during the
year and repaid US$115 million of the consideration outstanding for 91,000,000
of its shares repurchased from Rio Tinto plc in 2000.
Net
debt decreased from US$3,400 million at 31 December 2001 to US$3,122 million
at 31 December 2002 reflecting the cash flow during the period.
Adjusted earnings
UK
Financial Reporting Standard 3 expressly permits presentation of an adjusted
measure of earnings. As presented
by Rio Tinto, this excludes the effect of exceptional items of such magnitude
that their exclusion is useful in order that adjusted earnings fulfil their
purpose of reflecting the Group’s underlying performance. Except where
otherwise indicated, earnings contributions from business units and business
segments exclude the effect of these exceptional items. Adjusted earnings
is reconciled with net earnings on page 82 of the 2003 Annual report and
on page A-2 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix. Further information
on exceptional items may be found in note 4 on page 91 of the 2003 Annual
report and in note 4 on page A-13 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix.
Critical accounting estimates
The
Rio Tinto Group’s
critical accounting estimates have been set out on pages 35 to 36 of the
2003 Annual report.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 8
Trend information
The
Group’s worldwide
operations supply essential minerals and metals that help to meet global
needs and contribute to improvements in living standards, so changes in the
demand for its products are closely aligned with changes in global GDP. Changes
in the GDP of developing countries will have a greater impact on materials
such as iron ore and coal that can be used to improve infrastructure whereas
changes in the GDP of developed countries will have a greater impact on industrial
minerals that have many applications in consumer products. Trends in total
turnover, earnings, cash flow, debt, equity, total capital are set out on
pages 2 to 6 of the 2003 Annual report. Trends in the production of the Group’s
minerals and metals are set out in the Operational review on pages 37 to
51 of the 2003 Annual report.
Item 6. Directors,
Senior Management and Employees
Details
of the Group’s
directors, senior management and employees have been set out on pages 57
to 59 of the 2003 Annual report, the Remuneration report has been set out
on pages 62 to 69 of the 2003 Annual report and board practices have been
explained under Corporate governance on pages 70 to 72 of the 2003 Annual
report. Details of post retirement benefits have been set out in note 41
on pages 123 to 128 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 40 on pages A-52
to A-56 of the 2003 Annual report- Appendix.
Rio
Tinto’s employment policies have been summarised on page 56 of the
2003 Annual report. Employee costs have been set out in note 3 on page 90
of the 2003 Annual report and in note 3 on page A-12 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix,
and analyses of the average number of employees by principal location and
by business unit have been set out in note 30 on page 117 of the 2003 Annual
report and in note 30 on page A-46 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix.
As
made clear in The way we work, Rio Tinto’s statement of business
practice, the Group recognises everyone’s right to choose whether or
not they wish to be represented collectively.
Details
of the Group’s various arrangements for involving directors and employees
in its shares are set out in the Remuneration report on pages 62 to 69 of
the 2003 Annual report. The tables of the directors’ beneficial interests
in shares and their awards under long term incentive plans and options, as
included in the Remuneration report, have been updated to the latest practicable
date and are reproduced as follows:
Table 3 Directors’ beneficial interests in shares
1 Jan 20032 |
31 Dec 20038 |
19 Mar 2004 |
||||||||
Robert Adams3 | 56,599 | 71,764 | 71,818 | |||||||
Sir David Clementi4 | | | | |||||||
Leigh Clifford | 2,100 | 2,100 | 2,100 | |||||||
56,300 | 76,428 | 90,296 | ||||||||
Leon Davis | 6,100 | 6,100 | 6,100 | |||||||
133,838 | 187,293 | 187,293 | ||||||||
Guy Elliott3 | 28,897 | 40,847 | 42,487 | |||||||
Sir Richard Giordano | 1,065 | 1,065 | 1,065 | |||||||
Andrew Gould | | | | |||||||
Oscar Groeneveld | 19,010 | 19,010 | 19,010 | |||||||
6,909 | 23,515 | 31,357 | ||||||||
Sir John Kerr4 | | | | |||||||
Jonathan Leslie5 | 44,886 | 55,396 | n/a | |||||||
David Mayhew | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | |||||||
John Morschel | | | | |||||||
The Hon Raymond Seitz5 | 500 | 500 | n/a | |||||||
Paul Skinner | 1,000 | 5,140 | 5,140 | |||||||
Sir Richard Sykes | 2,294 | 2,359 | 2,359 | |||||||
Lord Tugendhat | 1,135 | 1,135 | 1,135 | |||||||
Sir Robert Wilson5 | 114,124 | 138,609 | n/a | |||||||
Notes | |
1. | Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares of 10p each; Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares stated in italics. |
2. | Or date of appointment if later. |
3. | These directors, together with other Rio Tinto plc Group employees, also had an interest in a trust fund containing 21,849 Rio Tinto plc shares at 31 December 2003 (1 January 2003: 102,136 Rio Tinto plc shares) as potential beneficiaries of The Rio Tinto Share Ownership Trust. At 19 March 2004 this trust fund contained 8,006 Rio Tinto plc shares. |
4. | Sir David Clementi and Sir John Kerr were appointed directors on 28 January 2003 and 14 October 2003 respectively. |
5. | Mr Leslie, The Hon Raymond Seitz and Sir Robert Wilson retired or resigned as directors on 31 March 2003, 1 May 2003 and 31 October 2003 respectively. |
6. | The above includes the beneficial interests obtained through the Rio Tinto Share Ownership Plan, details of which are set out on page 64 of the 2003 Annual report under the heading ‘Other share plans’. |
7. | The total beneficial interest of the directors in the Group amounts to less than one per cent. |
8. | Or date of retirement or resignation if earlier. |
9. | The shares held by the directors have the same voting and other rights as the shares held by other shareholders. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 9
Table 4 Awards to directors under long term incentive plans
Plan | 1 Jan 2003 |
Awarded | Lapsed | Vested1 | 31 Dec 20032 | Awarded | Lapsed | 19 Mar 2004 | |||||||||||
Robert Adams | MCCP 2000 | 27,830 | | 10,437 | 17,393 | | | | | ||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 27,330 | | | | 27,330 | | | 27,330 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 25,064 | | | | 25,064 | | | 25,064 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | 26,837 | | | 26,837 | | | 26,837 | |||||||||||
80,224 | 26,837 | 10,437 | 17,393 | 79,231 | | | 79,231 | ||||||||||||
Leigh Clifford5 | MCCP 2000 | 37,609 | | 14,104 | 23,505 | | | | | ||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 37,474 | | | | 37,474 | | | 37,474 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 34,435 | | | | 34,435 | | | 34,435 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | 36,341 | | | 36,341 | | | 36,341 | |||||||||||
109,518 | 36,341 | 14,104 | 23,505 | 108,250 | | | 108,250 | ||||||||||||
Guy Elliott | MCCP 2000 | 4,307 | | 1,616 | 2,691 | | | | | ||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 7,845 | | | | 7,845 | | | 7,845 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 16,935 | | | | 16,935 | | | 16,935 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | 22,923 | | | 22,923 | | | 22,923 | |||||||||||
29,087 | 22,923 | 1,616 | 2,691 | 47,703 | | | 47,703 | ||||||||||||
Oscar Groeneveld5 | MCCP 2000 | 21,266 | | 7,975 | 13,291 | | | | | ||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 20,934 | | | | 20,934 | | | 20,934 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 20,322 | | | | 20,322 | | | 20,322 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | 21,469 | | | 21,469 | | | 21,469 | |||||||||||
62,522 | 21,469 | 7,975 | 13,291 | 62,725 | | | 62,725 | ||||||||||||
Jonathan Leslie6 | MCCP 2000 | 21,574 | | 8,091 | 13,483 | | | | | ||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 21,192 | | | | 21,192 | | | n/a | |||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 19,758 | | 19,758 | | | | | | |||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
62,524 | | 27,849 | 13,483 | 21,192 | | | n/a | ||||||||||||
Sir Robert Wilson | MCCP 2000 | 50,191 | | 18,822 | 31,369 | | | | | ||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 49,796 | | | | 49,796 | | | n/a | |||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 47,983 | | | | 47,983 | | | n/a | |||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | 50,599 | 8,456 | | 42,143 | | | n/a | |||||||||||
147,970 | 50,599 | 27,278 | 31,369 | 139,922 | | | n/a | ||||||||||||
Notes | |
1. | The Rio Tinto Group’s 7th place ranking against the comparator group for the MCCP 2000 award will generate a 62.5 per cent vesting based on the scales applied to conditional awards made prior to 2004. |
2. | Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares of 10p each; Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares stated in italics. |
3. | The shares awarded under the MCCP 2000 vested on 27 February 2004 but, as the performance cycle ended on 31 December 2003, they have been dealt with in this table as if they had vested on that date. The values of these awards have been based on share prices of 1,386p and A$35.24, being the closing share prices on 6 February 2004, the latest practicable date prior to the publication of the 2003 Annual report. Amounts in Australian dollars have been translated into sterling at the year end exchange rate of £1=A$2.3785. |
4. | The shares awarded under the FTSE 1997 and MCCP 1999 vested on 28 February 2003 but as the performance cycles ended on 31 December 2002, they were dealt in the 2002 Annual report as if they had vested on that date. The values of the awards in the 2002 Annual report were based on share prices of 1,169p and A$32.52, being the closing share prices on 14 February 2003, the latest practicable prior to the publication of the 2002 Annual report. Amounts in Australian dollars were translated into sterling at the year end exchange rate of £1=A$2.829. |
The actual share prices on 28 February 2003, when the awards vested, were 1,268.5p and A$33.3518, with the result that the values of the awards had been understated in respect of Sir Robert Wilson by £105,773, Mr Adams by £61,321, Mr Leslie by £36,304, Mr Davis by £183,279, Mr Clifford by £12,143 and Mr Groeneveld by £36,319, and overstated in respect of Mr Elliott by £4,308. |
5. | Mr Clifford was given a conditional award over 36,341 Rio Tinto Limited shares and Mr Groeneveld was given a conditional award over 21,469 Rio Tinto Limited shares during the year. These awards were approved by the shareholders under ASX Listing Rule 10.14 at the 2003 annual general meeting. |
6. | Following Mr Leslie’s resignation from the boards of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited on 31 March 2003, the Remuneration committee agreed that his MCCP awards in 2000 and 2001 should continue to the end of their respective performance periods. The 2002 MCCP award was forfeited. |
7. | A full explanation of the MCCP together with the proposed changes under the plan can be found on pages 63 and 64 of the 2003 Annual report. |
8. | Or as at date of resignation or retirement if earlier. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 10
Table 5 Directors’ options to acquire Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares
Holding at 1 Jan 2003 |
Granted5 | Exercised/ cancelled |
Holding at 31 Dec 20037 |
Weighted average option price |
Options exercised / cancelled during year | Holding at 19 Mar 2004 |
|||||||||||||||||
Number | Option price |
Market price |
Gain on exercise £’000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert Adams | A | 398,615 | 114,014 | | 512,629 | 1,136p | 512,629 | ||||||||||||||||
Leigh Clifford | A | 384,050 | 254,132 | | 638,182 | A$31.10 | 638,182 | ||||||||||||||||
B | 208,882 | 208,882 | A$39.87 | A$39.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
Leon Davis | A | 93,978 | | | 93,978 | A$23.44 | A$23.44 | ||||||||||||||||
Guy Elliott | A | 106,183 | 98,818 | 27,241 | 177,760 | 1,323p | 8,292 | 820.0p | 1,273p | 38 | 1,323p | ||||||||||||
8,645 | 808.8p | 1,273p | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||
7,613 | 965.4p | 1,273p | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2,691 | 641.0p | 1,299p | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||
27,241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Oscar Groeneveld | A | 175,084 | 91,511 | | 266,595 | A$29.83 | A$29.83 | ||||||||||||||||
B | 73,965 | 73,965 | A$39.87 | A$39.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan Leslie | A | 309,775 | | 277,095 | 32,680 | 965p | 55,730 | 808.8p | 1,270p | 257 | n/a | ||||||||||||
53,414 | 820.0p | 1,270p | 240 | ||||||||||||||||||||
16,341 | 965.4p | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
77,749 | 1,265.6p | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
71,986 | 1,458.6p | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
1,875 | 876.0p | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
277,095 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sir Robert Wilson | A | 841,076 | 358,273 | 253,954 | 945,395 | 1,288p | 129,636 | 808.8p | 1,292p | 626 | n/a | ||||||||||||
124,318 | 1,263.0p | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
253,954 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A | is where the options are in respect of shares whose market price at the end of the financial year is equal to, or exceeds, the option price. |
B | is where the options are in respect of shares whose market price at the end of the financial year is below the option price. |
Notes | |
1. | Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares of 10p each; Rio Tinto Limited shares stated in italics. |
2. | Options have been granted under the Share Option Plan, the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plans and the Rio Tinto Limited Share Savings Plan. |
3. | The options granted to each director have been aggregated, except that any ‘out of the money options’ as at 31 December 2003 have been separately aggregated and disclosed. The closing price of Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares at 31 December 2003 was 1,543p (2002: 1,240p) and the closing price of Rio Tinto Limited shares at 31 December 2003 was A$37.54 (2002: A$33.95). |
4. | Two directors were granted share options under the Rio Tinto Share Savings Plan that are exercisable between 1 January 2009 and 30 June 2009. One was granted options over 1,431 Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares at 1,107p per share and the other was granted options over 1,431 Rio Tinto Limited shares at A$27.48 per share. |
5. | All other share options were granted under the Share Option Plan and, subject to the performance criteria explained on page 63 of the 2003 Annual report, are exercisable between 7 March 2006 and 7 March 2013. Options were granted over 569,674 Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares at 1,263p per share and over 344,212 Rio Tinto Limited shares at A$33.336 per share. |
6. | No directors’ options lapsed during the year. Following Mr Leslie’s resignation, 167,951 of his options were cancelled with immediate effect. Following Sir Robert Wilson’s retirement 124,318 of his options were also cancelled. |
7. | Or at date of retirement or resignation if earlier. |
Rio Tinto’s register of directors’ interests, which is open to inspection, contains full details of directors’ shareholdings and options to subscribe for Rio Tinto shares.
Corporate governance
Rio Tinto is committed to high
standards of corporate governance, for which the directors are accountable
to shareholders. Rio Tinto’s statement on corporate governance, report
of its Audit committee and Audit committee charter are set out on pages 70
to 73 of the 2003 Annual report. As a non US company Rio Tinto is permitted
to follow home country standards in relation to corporate governance in lieu
of complying with most of the provisions of Section 303A of the NYSE’s
Listed Company Manual but as from 2005 it will be required to disclose significant
differences, if any, between its standards of corporate governance and those
followed by US companies under NYSE listing standards.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 11
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
Major shareholders
As far as is known, Rio Tinto plc is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled
by another corporation or by any government. The Capital Group of Companies
Inc. by way of a notice dated 5 February 2004 informed the Company of its
interest in 65,148,434 ordinary shares representing 6.1 per cent of its
shares as at 6 February 2004. Rio Tinto plc does not know of any arrangements
which may result in a change in its control. As of 19 March 2004,
the total amount of the voting securities owned by the directors of Rio
Tinto plc as a group was 153,714 ordinary shares of 10p each representing
less than one per cent of the number in issue.
As
far as is known, Rio Tinto Limited, with the exception of the arrangements
for the dual listed companies merger described under Shareholder information
on page 77 to 79 of the 2003 Annual report, is not directly or indirectly
owned or controlled by another corporation or by any government. As of 19
March 2004, the only person known to Rio Tinto Limited as owning more than
five per cent of its shares was Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited, which
is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc, with 187,439,520
shares, representing 37.56 per cent of its issued capital. Rio Tinto Limited
does not know of any arrangements which may result in a change in its control.
As of 19 March 2004 the total amount of the voting securities owned by the
directors of Rio Tinto Limited as a group was 308,946 shares representing
less than one per cent of the number in issue.
Except
as provided under the DLC Merger Sharing Agreement as explained on page 78
of the 2003 Annual report, the group’s major shareholders have the
same voting and other rights as other shareholders.
As
at 19 March 2004 there were 253 US registered shareholders holding 150,158
shares in Rio Tinto plc, and 214 US registered shareholders holding 310,405
shares in Rio Tinto Limited.
Related party transactions
Details of the Group’s material related party transactions are set out
in note 38 on page 122 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 38 on page A-51
of the 2003 Annual report Appendix.
As
stated in the Financial review on page 32 of the 2003 Annual report the Group’s
financial statements show the full extent of the Group’s financial
commitments including debt and similar exposures. The Group’s share
of the net debt of joint ventures and associates is also disclosed. It is
not the Group’s practice to engineer financial structures as a way
of avoiding disclosure.
Legal proceedings
Neither Rio Tinto plc nor Rio Tinto Limited nor any of their subsidiaries is
a defendant in any proceedings which the directors believe will have a
significant effect on either Company’s financial position or results
of operations.
Dividends
The Group’s policy on dividend distributions is set out under Shareholder
information on page 74 of the 2003 Annual report.
Post balance sheet events
On
22 March 2004 Rio Tinto announced that it had reached agreement with Freeport
McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc
(“FCX”) for FCX to acquire for cash all of Rio Tinto’s
23,931,100 FCX shares. The consideration per share will be based on the price
used to establish the conversion price of FCX’s convertible preferred
stock which will be issued to finance the buy back. Completion, which is
subject to a number of conditions, will occur simultaneously with the closing
of FCX’s convertible preferred stock offering. Gross proceeds are expected
to amount to US$882 million.
The
sale of FCX shares does not affect the terms of Rio Tinto’s joint venture
interest in production from the Grasberg mine which is managed by FCX.
There
have been no other significant post balance sheet events.
Item 9. The
Offer and Listing
Share prices
and details of the markets on which the Group’s shares are traded
are set out under Shareholder information on pages 74 to 75 of the 2003
Annual report.
The
tables of the high and low share prices for Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
shares for the most recent six months have been extended to include February
2004 and are reproduced as follows:
Pence per Rio Tinto plc share |
US$ per Rio Tinto plc ADS |
||||||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | ||||||||||
Aug 2003 | 1,407 | 1,270 | 90.30 | 82.30 | |||||||||
Sep 2003 | 1,420 | 1,283 | 93.83 | 86.41 | |||||||||
Oct 2003 | 1,474 | 1,290 | 100.34 | 86.85 | |||||||||
Nov 2003 | 1,461 | 1,366 | 100.52 | 92.82 | |||||||||
Dec 2003 | 1,543 | 1,421 | 111.35 | 98.50 | |||||||||
Jan 2004 | 1,574 | 1,426 | 116.33 | 103.95 | |||||||||
Feb 2004 | 1,485 | 1,386 | 114.74 | 102.10 |
A$ per Rio Tinto Limited share |
US$ per Rio Tinto Limited ADS |
||||||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | ||||||||||
Aug 2003 | 34.31 | 31.55 | 88.83 | 83.19 | |||||||||
Sep 2003 | 35.31 | 32.87 | 94.00 | 88.34 | |||||||||
Oct 2003 | 36.59 | 32.32 | 101.00 | 88.22 | |||||||||
Nov 2003 | 35.96 | 33.68 | 102.56 | 97.52 | |||||||||
Dec 2003 | 37.54 | 34.79 | 112.42 | 101.11 | |||||||||
Jan 2004 | 38.41 | 35.36 | 118.35 | 107.75 | |||||||||
Feb 2004 | 36.62 | 35.08 | 115.60 | 106.75 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 12
Item 10. Additional information
Memorandum and Articles of
Association
Rio Tinto plc adopted new Articles
of Association by Special Resolution passed on 11 April 2002 and Rio Tinto
Limited amended its Constitution by Special Resolution on 18 April 2002. These
resolutions dealt with the creation of a new special purpose share in each
Company to be called a “DLC Dividend Share”. The objective of these
shares is to provide improved internal funds management flexibility to the
Rio Tinto Group by allowing dividends to be paid between the two parts of the
Group. Neither of theses shares has any rights attaching to it, other than
the right to dividends as declared by the boards. These resolutions also dealt
with some relatively minor technical amendments.
Introduction
As explained on pages 77 to 79 of the
2003 Annual report under the terms of the dual listed companies (‘DLC’)
merger the shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and of Rio Tinto Limited entered into
certain contractual arrangements which are designed to place the shareholders
of both Companies in substantially the same position as if they held shares
in a single enterprise which owned all of the assets of both Companies. Generally
and as far as is permitted by the UK Companies Act and the Australian Corporations
Law this principle is reflected in the Memorandum and Articles of Association
of Rio Tinto plc and in the Constitution of Rio Tinto Limited. The summaries
below include descriptions of material rights of the shareholders of both Rio
Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited. Unless stated otherwise the Memorandum and
Articles of Association of and Constitution are identical.
Rio
Tinto plc is incorporated under the name “Rio Tinto plc” and
is registered in England and Wales with registered number 719885 and Rio
Tinto Limited is incorporated under the name “Rio Tinto Limited” and
is registered in Australia with ACN Number 004458404.
No
holder of shares, which may be held in either certificated or uncertificated
form, will be required to make any additional contributions of capital.
Objects The objects of Rio Tinto plc are set out in the fourth clause of its Memorandum of Association and the objects of Rio Tinto Limited are set out in the second clause of its Constitution. Included in these objects is the right for each Company to enter into, with one another, operate and carry into effect an Agreement known as the DLC Merger Sharing Agreement and a Deed Poll Guarantee. |
|
Other objects of Rio Tinto plc include provisions: | |
| to carry on as an Investment Holding Company; |
| to subscribe for, sell, exchange or dispose of any type of security or investment; |
| to purchase any estate or interest in property or assets; |
| to borrow and raise money to secure or discharge any debt or obligation of or binding on the Company; |
| to draw, make or deal in negotiable or transferable instruments; |
| to amalgamate with and co-operate with or assist or subsidise any company, firm or person and to purchase or otherwise acquire or undertake all or any part of the business property or liabilities of any person, body or company carrying on any business which this Company is authorised to carry on; |
| to promote the Company; |
| to lend money and guarantee contracts or obligations of the Company and to give all kinds of indemnities; |
| to sell, lease, grant licences and other rights over any part of the Company; |
| to procure the registration of the Company outside England; |
| to subscribe or guarantee money to any national, charitable, benevolent, public, general or exhibition which may further the objects of the Company or the interest of its members; |
| to grant pensions or gratuities to employees, ex-employees, officers and ex-officers; |
| to establish any scheme or trust which may benefit employees; |
| to lend money to employees to purchase Company shares; |
| to purchase and maintain insurance for employees and to carry on the objects of the Company in any part of the world either as principals, agents, contractors, trustees or otherwise. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 13
Other objects of Rio Tinto Limited include the powers: | |
| to prospect for, explore, quarry, develop, excavate, dredge for, open, work, win, purchase or otherwise obtain all minerals, metals and substances; |
| to carry on business as proprietors of and to purchase, take on, lease or in exchange or otherwise acquire and control mineral and other properties, lands and hereditaments of any tenure, mines and other rights or options thereon; |
| to raise, win, get, quarry, crush, smelt, calcine, refine, dress, amalgamate, manipulate and otherwise treat, prepare, sell and deal in ores, metals and other products of mines; |
| to carry on business as ship owners, railway proprietors, motor car, lorry and coach proprietors, and garage proprietors, carriers and hauliers, bankers, storekeepers, wharfingers, cartage, storage, building and general contractors and to buy and sell or otherwise deal in real or personal property of any kind; |
| to carry on business as manufacturers of and dealers in and exporters and importers of goods and merchandise of all kinds and merchants generally; and |
| to guarantee the payment of premiums on any sinking fund or endowment policy or policies taken out by any company having objects similar to the objects of the Company. |
Directors | |
Under Rio Tinto plc's Articles of Association a director may not vote in respect of any proposal in which he or any other person connected with him, has any material interest other than by virtue of his interests in shares or debentures or other securities of or otherwise in or through the Company, except where resolutions: | |
(a) | indemnify him or a third party in respect of obligations incurred by the director on behalf of, or for the benefit of, the Company, or in respect of obligations of the Company, for which the director has assumed responsibility under an indemnity, security or guarantee; |
(b) | relate to an offer of securities in which he may be interested as a holder of securities or as an underwriter; |
(c) | concern another body corporate in which the director is beneficially interested in less than one per cent of the issued shares of any class of shares of such a body corporate; |
(d) | relate to an employee benefit in which the director will share equally with other employees; and |
(e) | relate to liability insurance that the Company is empowered to purchase for the benefit of directors of the Company in respect of actions undertaken as directors (or officers) of the Company. |
Under Rio Tinto Limited's
Constitution, except where a director is constrained by Australian law,
a director may be present at a meeting of the board while a matter in
which the director has a material interest is being considered and may
vote in respect of that matter. The directors are empowered to exercise all the powers of the Companies to borrow money, to charge any property or business of the Companies or all or any of their uncalled capital and to issue debentures or give any other security for a debt, liability or obligation of the Companies or of any other person. The directors shall restrict the borrowings of Rio Tinto plc to the limitation that the aggregate amount of all moneys borrowed by the Company and its subsidiaries shall not exceed an amount equal to one and one half times the Company’s share capital plus aggregate reserves unless sanctioned by an ordinary resolution of the Company. Directors are not required to hold any shares of either Company by way of qualification, but a director is nevertheless entitled to attend and speak at shareholders' meetings. Nevertheless, as disclosed in the Remuneration report on pages 62 to 69 of the 2003 Annual report the Remuneration committee has informed the executive directors that they would be expected to build up a shareholding equal in value to two times salary over five years. Directors are required to retire in accordance with statutory age limits. Directors who were elected or re-elected a director in the third year before each annual general meeting are required to retire by rotation and such further directors (if any) shall retire by rotation as would bring the number retiring by rotation up to one third of the number of directors in office at the date of the notice of meeting (or, if their number is not a multiple of three, the number nearest to but not greater than one third). These further directors required to retire shall be selected from the other directors subject to retirement by rotation who have been longest in office since their last re-election and where directors were re-elected on the same day then, unless they otherwise agree amongst themselves, they will be selected by the alphabetical order of their names. In addition any director appointed by the directors since the last annual general meeting is also required to retire. A retiring director shall be eligible for re-election. In the absence of an independent quorum, the directors are not competent to vote compensation to themselves or to any members of their body. |
Rights attaching
to Shares
Under English law, dividends on shares
may only be paid out of profits available for distribution, as determined in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and by the relevant
law. Shareholders are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by
the directors. The directors may also pay shareholders such interim dividends
as appear to them to be justified by the financial position of the Group.
Any
Rio Tinto plc dividend unclaimed after 12 years from the date the dividend
was declared, or became due for payment, will be forfeited and returned to
the Company. Any Rio Tinto Limited dividend unclaimed may be invested or
otherwise made use of by the board for the benefit of the Company until claimed
or otherwise disposed of according to Australian law.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 14
Voting rights Voting at any general meeting of shareholders is by a show of hands unless on a poll, being a written vote, that has been duly demanded. On a show of hands, every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy at a general meeting has one vote regardless of the number of shares held. On a poll, every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy has one vote for every ordinary share or share for which he or she is the holder and, in the case of Joint Decisions, the holder of the Special Voting Share has one vote for each vote cast by the public shareholders at the parallel meeting of shareholders. The voting rights attached to the Special Voting Share have been set out on page 78 of the 2003 Annual report. A poll may be demanded by any of the following: |
|
| the chairman of the meeting; |
| at least five shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting; |
| any shareholder or shareholders representing in the aggregate not less than one tenth (Rio Tinto plc) or one twentieth (Rio Tinto Limited) of the total voting rights of all shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting; |
| any shareholder or shareholders holding shares conferring a right to vote at the meeting on which there have been paid-up sums in the aggregate equal to not less than one tenth of the total sum paid up on all the shares conferring that right; or |
| the holder of the Special Voting Share. |
A proxy form will be treated
as giving the proxy the authority to demand a poll, or to join others
in demanding one. The necessary quorum for a Rio Tinto plc general meeting is three persons and for a Rio Tinto Limited general meeting is two persons carrying a right to vote upon the business to be transacted, whether present in person or by proxy. Matters are transacted at general meetings by the proposing and passing of resolutions, of which there are three kinds: |
| an ordinary resolution, which includes resolutions for the election of directors, the receiving of financial statements, the cumulative annual payment of dividends, the appointment of auditors, the increase of authorised share capital or the grant of authority to allot shares; |
| a special resolution, which includes resolutions amending the Company’s Memorandum and Articles of Association, disapplying statutory pre-emption rights or changing the Company’s name; and |
| an extraordinary resolution, which includes resolutions modifying the rights of any class of the Company’s shares at a meeting of the holders of such class or relating to certain matters concerning the Company’s winding up. |
An ordinary resolution requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes of those persons voting at a meeting at which there is a quorum. Special and extraordinary resolutions require the affirmative vote of not less than three fourths of the persons voting at a meeting at which there is a quorum. In the case of an equality of votes, whether on a show of hands or on a poll, the chairman of the meeting is entitled to cast the deciding vote in addition to any other vote he may have. | |
The DLC
Merger Sharing Agreement further classifies these three kinds of resolutions
into ‘Joint Decisions’ and ‘Class Rights Actions’ as
explained on page 78 of the 2003 Annual report. Annual general meetings must be convened with 21 days advance written notice for Rio Tinto plc and with 28 days for Rio Tinto Limited. Other meetings must be convened with 21 days advance written notice for the passing of a special resolution and with 14 days for any other resolution, depending on the nature of the business to be transacted. The days of delivery or receipt of the notice are not included. The notice must specify the nature of the business to be transacted. The board of directors may, if they choose, make arrangements for shareholders who are unable to attend the place of the meeting to participate at other places. |
Variation of Rights
If, at any time, the share capital is
divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class may
be varied, subject to the provisions of the relevant legislation, with the consent
in writing of holders of three fourths in value of the shares of that class or
upon the adoption of an extraordinary resolution passed at a separate meeting
of the holders of the shares of that class. At every such separate meeting, all
of the provision of the Articles of Association and Constitution relating to
proceedings at a general meeting apply, except that the quorum is to be the number
of persons (which must be two or more) who hold or represent by proxy not less
than one third in nominal value of the issued shares of the class.
The
DLC Merger Sharing Agreement provides for the protection of the public shareholders
of both Companies and so any variations of rights would be dealt with as ‘Class
Rights Actions’ that require the separate approval of the shareholders
of both Companies.
Rights in a Winding-up Except as the shareholders have agreed or may otherwise agree, upon a winding up, the balance of assets available for distribution: |
|
| after the payment of all creditors including certain preferential creditors, whether statutorily preferred creditors or normal creditors; and |
| subject to any special rights attaching to any class of shares; |
is to be distributed among
the holders of ordinary shares according to the amounts paid-up on the
shares held by them. This distribution is generally to be made in cash.
A liquidator may, however, upon the adoption of an extraordinary resolution
of the shareholders, divide among the shareholders the whole or any part
of the assets in kind. The DLC Merger Sharing Agreement further sets out the rights of ordinary shareholders in a liquidation as explained under Shareholder information on page 78 of the 2003 Annual report. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 15
Limitations on Voting and Shareholding
There are no limitations imposed by either
law or Rio Tinto plc's Memorandum or Articles of Association or Rio Tinto Limited's
Constitution on the right of non-residents or foreign persons to hold or vote
the ordinary shares or ADSs, other than the limitations that would generally
apply to all shareholders and those that arise from the DLC merger.
There
are no restrictions under Rio Tinto plc’s Memorandum and Articles of
Association or under English law that limit the right of non resident or
foreign owners to hold or vote its shares. Nor are there any restrictions
under Rio Tinto Limited’s constitution or under Australian law that
limit the right of non residents to hold or vote its shares, other than under
the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975, see Shareholder information
on pages 76 to 77 of the 2003 Annual report for details. A description of
the change in control provisions triggered by significant share ownership
is set out under Shareholder information on pages 78 to 79 of the 2003 Annual
report.
Exchange controls
At present, there are no exchange
controls or other restrictions that affect remittance of the Group’s
dividends to US residents, but see Shareholder information on page 76 to 77
of the 2003 Annual report for controls on remittances to certain specified
organisations and certain specified targets related to certain specified territories.
Taxation This section describes the material United States federal income tax consequences of ownership of Rio Tinto plc ADSs, Rio Tinto plc shares, Rio Tinto Limited ADSs and Rio Tinto Limited shares (“the Group’s ADSs and Shares”). It applies to you only if you are a US holder, as defined below, and you hold the Group’s ADSs and Shares as capital assets for tax purposes. This section does not apply to you if you are a member of a special class of holders subject to special rules, including: |
|
| a dealer in securities; |
| a trader in securities that elects to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for your securities holdings; |
| a tax-exempt organisation; |
| a life insurance company; |
| a person liable for alternative minimum tax; |
| a person that actually or constructively owns 10% or more of our voting stock; |
| a person that holds the Group’s ADSs and Shares as a part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction; or |
| a person whose functional currency is not the US dollar. |
This section is based on
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history,
existing and proposed regulations, published rulings and court decisions,
and on the convention between the United States of America and United
Kingdom, that was ratified and came in force on 31 March 2003, which
may affect the tax consequences of the ownership of the Group’s
ADSs and Shares. These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive
basis. In addition, this section is based in part upon the representations
by The Bank of New York as Depositary and the assumption that each obligation
in our deposit agreement relating to the ADRs and any agreement will
be performed in accordance with its terms. You are a US holder if you are a beneficial owner of the Group’s ADSs and Shares and you are: |
| a citizen or resident of the United States; |
| a corporation created or organised under the laws of the United States or any of its political subdivision; |
| an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source; or |
| a trust if a United States court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more United States persons are authorised to control all substantial decisions of the trust. |
In general, and taking into
account the earlier assumptions, for United States federal income tax
purposes, if you hold ADRs evidencing ADSs, you will be treated as the
owner of the shares represented by those ADSs. Exchanges of shares for
ADRs, and ADRs for shares, generally will not be subject to United States
federal income tax. Rio Tinto believes that it will not be treated as a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) for US federal income tax purposes. The further discussion of the tax consequences of holding the Group’s ADSs and shares by US residents under Shareholder information on page 76 of the 2003 Annual report assumes this treatment. With reference to the description of the holding requirement period pursuant to the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 included under US Federal income tax on page 76 of the 2003 Annual report, the IRS announced on 19 February 2004 that it will permit taxpayers to apply a proposed legislative change to this holding period requirement as if such change were already effective. This legislative "technical correction" would change the minimum required holding period, retroactive from 1 January 2003, to more than 60 days during the 121 day period beginning 60 days before the ex dividend date. US holders should consult their tax advisers regarding United States federal, state and local and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of the Group’s ADSs and Shares in their particular circumstances. |
Documents on display
Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
file reports and other information with the SEC. You may read without charge
and copy at prescribed rates any document filed at the public reference facilities
of the SEC’s principal office at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C.
20549, United States of America. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the operation of the public reference facilities.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 16
Item 11. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Rio Tinto Group's policies
for currency, interest rate and commodity price exposures, and the use of derivative
financial instruments are discussed in the Financial review on pages 32 to
36 of the 2003 Annual report. In addition, the Group's quantitative and qualitative
disclosures about market risk are set out in note 28 on pages 111 to 116 of
the 2003 Annual report and in note 28 on pages A-39 to A-44 of the 2003 Annual
report Appendix. The discussion regarding market risk contains certain
forward looking statements and attention is drawn to the Cautionary statement
under Item 3 on page 6.
2003 compared with 2002
Currency hedges of trading transactions
which matured during 2003 have not been replaced by new hedges. The sensitivity
of the Group's earnings to currency movements has therefore increased slightly.
Exchange rates
In any particular year, currency
fluctuations may have a significant impact on Rio Tinto's financial results.
A weakening of the US dollar against the currencies in which the Group’s
costs are incurred has an adverse effect on Rio Tinto’s net earnings.
The approximate effect on the Group's net earnings of ten per cent movements
from the 2003 full year average exchange rates of the currencies having most
impact on costs are as follows:
2003 Average exchange rate in US cents |
2003 Effect of 10% change in full year average US$m |
2002 Average exchange rate in US cents |
2002 Effect of 10% change in full year average US$m |
||||||
Australian $ | 65 | 141 +/- | 54 | 115 +/- | |||||
Canadian $ | 71 | 26 +/- | 64 | 18 +/- | |||||
South African rand | 13 | 22 +/- | 9 | 14 +/- | |||||
These sensitivities are based on the prices, costs and volumes for each respective year and assume that all other variables remain constant. They take into account the effect of hedges maturing in each year as disclosed in note 28 on pages 111 to 116 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 28 on pages A-39 to A-44 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix. These exchange rate sensitivities include the effect on operating costs of movements in exchange rates but exclude the impact through revaluation of foreign currency working capital and should therefore be used with care.
Interest rates
Based on the Group's net debt at
31 December 2003 and with other variables unchanged, the approximate effect
on the Group's net earnings of a one per cent increase in US dollar LIBOR interest
rates would be a reduction of US$30 million (2002: US$40 million based
on the Group's net debt at 31 December 2002).
Commodity prices
Approximately 40 per cent (2002:
35 per cent) of Rio Tinto's net earnings from operating businesses came from
products whose prices were terminal market related and the remainder came from
products priced by direct negotiation.
The
approximate effect on the Group's net earnings of a ten per cent change from
the full year average market price for the following metals would be:
2003 | 2003 | 2002 | 2002 | ||||||
Average | Effect of 10% | Average | Effect of 10% | ||||||
market | change in full year | market | change in full year | ||||||
price | average | price | average | ||||||
US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Copper | 80 c/lb | 109 +/- | 71 c/lb | 95 +/- | |||||
Aluminium | 65 c/lb | 95 +/- | 61 c/lb | 75 +/- | |||||
Gold | US$363 oz | 52 +/- | US$309 oz | 55 +/- | |||||
Item
12. Description of Securities other
than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 17
PART II
Item 13. Defaults,
Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None.
Item
14. Material Modification to the Rights
of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
There are no material modifications
to the rights of security holders.
Item
15. Controls and Procedures
The conclusions of management about
the effectiveness of the Rio Tinto Group’s disclosure controls and procedures
have been set out on page 80 of the 2003 Annual report.
Item
16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
Details relating to the Audit committee
financial expert have been set out under Corporate governance on page 72 of the
2003 Annual report.
Item
16B. Code of Ethics
Rio Tinto’s
statement of business practice, The way we work and its supplementary
guidance documents, has been described under Corporate governance on page 71
of the 2003 Annual report and can be viewed on the Group’s website at
www.riotinto.com.
Item
16C. Principal Accountant Fees and
Services
The remuneration of the Group’s
principal auditors for audit services and other services as well as remuneration
payable to other accounting firms has been set out in note 37 on page 121 of
the 2003 Annual report and in note 37 on page A-50 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix.
Audit-related regulatory reporting
Includes the audit of employee benefit
plans, consultation regarding GAAP and International FRS and assistance and advice
in connection with the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
Further assurance services
Includes due diligence of potential business
acquisitions and disposals.
Tax services
Includes tax compliance, involving the
preparation or review of tax returns for corporation, income, sales, excise and
other taxes and duties, consultancy in relation to tax audits, accounting, restructurings,
mergers and acquisitions, advice on transfer pricing and dealing with tax returns
for expatriates.
Other services
Includes reviews of risk management policies
and procedures, forensic investigations, review of actuarial reports, provision
of training services and other procedures of an assurance nature.
Rio Tinto has adopted policies
designed to uphold the independence of the Group’s principal auditors
by prohibiting their engagement to provide a range of accounting and other
professional services that might compromise their appointment as independent
auditors. The engagement of the Group’s principal auditors to provide
statutory audit services, certain other assurance services, tax services
and certain limited other services are pre-approved. The engagement of the
Group’s principal auditors to provide other permitted services are
individually subject to the specific approval of the Audit committee or its
chairman.
Prior
to the commencement of each financial year the Group’s Finance director
and its principal auditors submit to the Audit committee a schedule of the
types of services that are expected to be performed during the following
year for its approval. The Audit committee may impose a US dollar limit on
the total value of other permitted services that can be provided. Any non
audit service provided by the Group’s principal auditors, where the
expected fee exceeds a pre-determined level, must be subject to the Group’s
normal tender procedures. However, in exceptional circumstances the Finance
director is authorised to engage the Group’s principal auditors to
provide such services without going to tender, but if the fees are expected
to exceed $250,000 then the chairman of the audit committee must approve
the engagement.
The
Audit committee adopted policies for the pre-approval of permitted services
provided by the Group’s principal auditors during January 2003 which
were further refined and adopted during September 2003. All of the engagements
for services provided by the Group's principal auditors since the adoption
of these policies were either within the pre-approval policies or approved
by the Audit committee.
Item
16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards
for Audit Committees
Not applicable.
Item
16E. Purchases of Equity Securities
by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 18
PART III
Item 17. Financial
Statements
Not applicable.
Item
18. Financial Statements
The financial statements for the
Rio Tinto Group and the Report of the Independent Auditors have been set out
on pages 81 to 135 of the 2003 Annual report and the separate financial statements
for the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Rio Tinto Group and
the Report of the Independent Auditors have been set out on pages A-1 to A-75
of the 2003 Annual report Appendix.
Item
19. Exhibits
Exhibits marked “*” have
been filed as exhibits to this annual report on Form 20-F and other exhibits
have been incorporated by reference as indicated.
Index
Exhibit
Number Description
1.1 | Memorandum and Articles of Association of Rio Tinto plc (adopted by special resolution passed on 11 April 2002) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.11 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2002, File No. 1-10533). |
1.2 | Constitution of Rio Tinto Limited (ACN 004 458 404) (as adopted by special resolution passed on 24 May 2000 and amended by special resolution on 18 April 2002) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2002, File No. 1-10533). |
3.1 | DLC Merger Implementation Agreement, dated 3 November 1995 between CRA Limited and The RTZ Corporation PLC relating to the implementation of the DLC merger (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 1995, File No. 1-10533). |
3.2 | DLC Merger Sharing Agreement, dated 21 December 1995 between CRA Limited and The RTZ Corporation PLC relating to the ongoing relationship between CRA and RTZ following the DLC merger (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 1995, File No. 1-10533). |
3.3 | RTZ Shareholder Voting Agreement, dated 21 December 1995 between The RTZ Corporation PLC, RTZ Shareholder SVC Pty. Limited, CRA Limited, R.T.Z. Australian Holdings Limited and The Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 1995, File No. 1-10533). |
3.4 | CRA Shareholder Voting Agreement, dated 21 December 1995 between CRA Limited, CRA Shareholder SVC Limited, The RTZ Corporation PLC and The Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c., relating to the RTZ Special Voting Share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 1995, File No. 1-10533). |
4.01 | Letter dated 1 January 1992 to Mr R Adams about supplementary pension arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.23 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.02 | Supplementary letter dated 1 January 1992 to Mr R Adams about pension arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.03 | Letter dated 22 November 1994 to Mr R Adams about supplementary pension arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.29 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.04 | Letter dated 20 January 1997 to Mr R Adams about directors' pension arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2001, File No. 1-10533). |
4.05 | Service Agreement dated 15 April 2003 between Mr R Adams and Rio Tinto London Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.30 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2002, File No. 1-10533). |
*4.06 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2004 to Service Agreement dated 15 April 2003 between Mr R Adams and Rio Tinto London Limited. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 19
4.07 | Service Agreement dated 24 March 1999 between Mr R L Clifford and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.08 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1999 to Service Agreement dated 24 March 1999 between Mr R L Clifford and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.09 | Memorandum effective 1 April 2000 to Service Agreement dated 24 March 1999 between Mr R L Clifford and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.20 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.10 | Memorandum effective 1 April 2001 to Service Agreement dated 24 March 1999 between Mr R L Clifford and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.21 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.11 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2002 to Service Agreement dated 24 March 1999 between Mr R L Clifford and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.23 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2001, File No. 1-10533). |
4.12 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2003 to Service Agreement dated 24 March 1999 between Mr R L Clifford and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.25 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2002, File No. 1-10533). |
*4.13 | Memorandum effective 1 November 2003 to Service Agreement dated 24 March 1999 between Mr R L Clifford and Rio Tinto Limited. |
4.14 | Service Agreement dated 19 June 2002 between Mr G R Elliott and Rio Tinto London Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.31 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2002, File No. 1-10533). |
4.15 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2003 to Service Agreement dated 19 June 2002 between Mr G R Elliott and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2002, File No. 1-10533). |
*4.16 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2004 to Service Agreement dated 19 June 2002 between Mr G R Elliott and Rio Tinto London Limited. |
4.17 | Service Agreement dated 19 January 1999 between Mr O L Groeneveld and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.53 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.18 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1999 to Service Agreement dated 19 January 1999 between Mr O L Groeneveld and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.54 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.19 | Memorandum effective 1 April 2000 to Service Agreement dated 19 January 1999 between Mr O L Groeneveld and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.55 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.20 | Memorandum effective 1 April 2001 to Service Agreement dated 19 January 1999 between Mr O L Groeneveld and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.56 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.21 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2002 to Service Agreement dated 19 January 1999 between Mr O L Groeneveld and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.61 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2001, File No. 1-10533). |
4.22 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2003 to Service Agreement dated 19 January 1999 between Mr O L Groeneveld and Rio Tinto Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.38 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2002, File No. 1-10533). |
*4.23 | Service Agreement dated 19 January 2004 between Mr O L Groeneveld and Rio Tinto Limited. |
*4.24 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2004 to Service Agreement dated 19 January 2004 between Mr O L Groeneveld and Rio Tinto Limited. |
4.25 | Service Agreement dated 1 June 1994 between Mr J C A Leslie and RTZ Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.57 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.26 | Letter dated 22 November 1994 to Mr J C A Leslie about supplementary pension arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.58 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.27 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1995 to Service Agreement dated 1 June 1994 between Mr J C A Leslie and RTZ Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.59 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.28 | Letter dated 20 January 1997 to Mr J C A Leslie about directors' pension arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.60 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.29 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1998 to Service Agreement dated 1 June 1994 between Mr J C A Leslie and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.61 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.30 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1999 to Service Agreement dated 1 June 1994 between Mr J C A Leslie and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.62 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 20
4.31 | Memorandum effective 1 April 2000 to Service Agreement dated 1 June 1994 between Mr J C A Leslie and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.63 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.32 | Memorandum effective 1 April 2001 to Service Agreement dated 1 June 1994 between Mr J C A Leslie and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.64 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.33 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2002 to Service Agreement dated 19 August 1991 between Mr J C A Leslie and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.70 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2001, File No. 1-10533). |
4.34 | Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and RTZ Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.35 | Letter dated 1 January 1992 to Sir Robert Wilson about supplementary pension arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.02 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.36 | Supplementary letter dated 1 January 1992 to Sir Robert Wilson about pension arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.03 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.37 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1992 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and RTZ Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.04 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.38 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1993 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and RTZ Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.05 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.39 | Letter dated 9 March 1994 amending Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and RTZ Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.06 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.40 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1994 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and RTZ Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.07 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.41 | Letter dated 22 November 1994 to Sir Robert Wilson about supplementary pension arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.08 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.42 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1995 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and RTZ Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.09 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.43 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1996 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and RTZ Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.44 | Letter dated 20 January 1997 to Sir Robert Wilson about directors' pension arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.45 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1997 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and RTZ Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.46 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1998 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.47 | Memorandum effective 1 April 1999 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.48 | Memorandum effective 1 April 2000 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.49 | Supplementary letter dated 14 February 2001 to Sir Robert Wilson about reduction of notice period (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.50 | Memorandum effective 1 April 2001 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 21
4.51 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2002 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2001, File No. 1-10533). |
4.52 | Memorandum effective 1 March 2003 to Service Agreement dated 1 January 1992 between Sir Robert Wilson and Rio Tinto London Limited (formerly RTZ Limited) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2002, File No. 1-10533). |
4.53 | Mining Companies Comparative Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.65 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.54 | Share Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.66 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.55 | Medical expenses plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.67 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
4.56 | Pension plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.68 of Rio Tinto plc's Annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 December 2000, File No. 1-10533). |
*8.1 | List of subsidiary companies. |
*10.1 | Consent of Independent Accountants. |
*99.1 | Certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
*99.2 | Certifications furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act (such certificate is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated by reference with any filing under the Securities Act). |
SIGNATURE
The Registrants hereby certify that they meet all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that they have duly caused and authorised the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on their behalf.
Rio Tinto plc | Rio
Tinto Limited
|
(Registrant) | (Registrant)
|
/s/ Anette Lawless | /s/ Anette
Lawless
|
|
Name: Anette Lawless | Name: Anette
Lawless
|
|
Title: Secretary | Title:
Assistant Secretary
|
|
Date: 26 March 2004 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 22
Rio Tinto
Rio
Tinto
is a leader in finding, mining and processing the earths
mineral resources. The Groups worldwide operations supply essential
minerals and metals that help to meet global needs and contribute to improvements
in living standards. Rio Tinto encourages strong local identities and has
a devolved management philosophy, entrusting responsibility with accountability
to the workplace.
In
order to deliver superior returns to shareholders over time, Rio Tinto takes
a long term and responsible approach to the Groups business. We concentrate
on the development of first class orebodies into large, long life and efficient
operations, capable of sustaining competitive advantage through business cycles.
Major
products include aluminium, copper, diamonds, energy products (coal and uranium),
gold, industrial minerals (borax, titanium dioxide, salt and talc) and iron
ore. The Groups activities span the world but are strongly represented
in Australia and North America with significant businesses in South America,
Asia, Europe and southern Africa.
Wherever
Rio Tinto operates, health and safety is our first priority. We seek to contribute
to sustainable development. We work as closely as possible with our host countries
and communities, respecting laws and customs. We minimise adverse effects
and strive to improve every aspect of our performance. We employ local people
at all levels and ensure fair and equitable transfer of benefits and enhancement
of opportunities.
Cover photograph, stacked aluminium billets at Boyne Island smelter, Australia.
2003 Annual report and financial statements | ||||
FORM 20-F | ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |||
The information referenced in this Annual report and financial statements will be incorporated into Rio Tintos Annual report on Form 20-F that will be filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This filing will exclude certain pages that are not SEC compliant and will include some additional replacement pages and additional data and so the index to Form 20-F is for general reference only. | Rio Tintos Annual report and financial statements encompass Australian, UK and relevant US statutory requirements. The majority of shareholders have chosen to receive a shorter Annual review but those who wish to receive the full Annual report and financial statements for all future years may do so by writing to the Companies registrars. | |||
The attention of readers is drawn to the Risk factors and Cautionary statement about forward looking statements on page 7. | Both the above documents are also available in electronic form. For futher details please visit the Rio Tinto website www.riotinto.com | |||
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 1 |
Chairmans letter |
Adjusted
earnings |
Net
earnings US$m |
|
Net
earnings in 2001 2002 and 2003 were after exceptional items. |
Cash
flow from |
Dividends
per share US UK Australian cents pence cents |
|
Dear shareholder
Having joined the board as a non executive director in 2001, I was delighted to be asked to succeed Sir Robert Wilson as chairman in November 2003. I look forward to working with Leigh Clifford and his executive team and I share fully the Groups
long standing commitment to creating shareholder value, delivering operational
excellence and embracing sustainable development.
My focus will be on corporate governance, strategy and relations with our key stakeholders. I intend to contribute where possible to the Groups
continuing efforts to integrate sustainable development into our business. Rio
Tinto now represents my principal activity and I will commit whatever time is
required to fulfil my role.
The year 2003 proved to be challenging for Rio Tinto. As the world economy continued its slow recovery, strong growth in key markets, like China, resulted in significant increases in the prices of some of our key commodities. This was particularly the case with iron ore, copper and alumina. Prices for seaborne thermal and coking coal improved towards the end of the year, but those for industrial minerals remained weak.
Unfortunately, revenue gains from higher US dollar prices were mostly offset by the weakness of the US dollar against some of our main producing currencies. We also incurred higher costs as a result of supply and logistical constraints and a number of operational events which affected production at some of our businesses.
Our adjusted earnings were US$1,382 million, US$148 million below 2002, while net earnings were US$1,508 million, or 109.5 US cents per share. The term adjusted earnings is defined on page 32. Cash flow from operations was US$3,486 million, only seven per cent below the previous year. Dividends equivalent to 64 US cents per share have been declared for 2003 as a whole compared with 60 US cents in 2002. This also means that the 2004 interim dividend payable in September can be expected to be 32 US cents per share.
We continue to manage our assets proactively. Our diversified portfolio includes many world class assets across a range of commodities which continue to provide resilience in earnings as well as attractive growth opportunities. Our current development programme includes major investments in our iron ore, bauxite and alumina operations. New capacity has also recently been added in coking coal and diamonds. During 2004/2005 we plan to
invest approximately US$4 billion in our core businesses.
We aim to achieve high standards of corporate governance. Our board consists of nine non executive directors, of whom seven have been assessed by the board to be fully independent, four executive directors and myself as chairman. Collectively, the non executive directors bring an outstanding range of experience which is vital to good governance and corporate accountability in todays
world. An account of our level of compliance with both the current and the
new, recently introduced, Combined Codes in the UK is given in our discussion
of corporate governance starting on page 70. We also comply with the requirements
of the Australian Stock Exchange Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines
and those of other authorities in countries where we have obligations.
Lord Tugendhat will be retiring from the board at this years
annual meeting after seven years of distinguished contribution, for which
we thank him. We welcomed Sir John Kerr, formerly head of the UK Diplomatic
Service, to the board in October 2003 and he is standing for election to
the board at the forthcoming annual general meetings.
This letter would not be complete without special recognition of Sir Robert Wilsons
retirement after 33 years of outstanding service to the Group. Bobs
vision and strategic leadership were pivotal to a number of major portfolio
transactions which have transformed Rio Tinto into the industry leading position
it holds today. We thank him for all he has done for the Group, and for shareholders,
and wish him well in his new activities.
Looking forward to 2004, we expect to see stronger markets for a number of our products. Overall market conditions and increased production from recent investments look encouraging. However, exchange rate developments will be a critical determinant of earnings in 2004.
In conclusion, I would like to acknowledge the hard work and dedication of Rio Tintos
employees throughout the world in 2003. Their contribution and continuing
commitments to our core values is a vital factor in delivering sustained
high performance in a challenging world.
Paul Skinner Chairman
2 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Chief executives report |
Graph |
Product
group |
Note:
2003, 2002 and 2001 |
The year 2003 was characterised by the impact of the weak US dollar eroding margins and by prices which did not strengthen until towards the end of the year. However, strong cash flow and a number of completed and current projects paved the way for strong progress to be sustained in the future. Continuing robust demand from China has presented us with opportunities for growth in a number of commodities.
Operating performance
Product group earnings were US$1,584 million, compared with US$1,776 million in 2002.
Market conditions remained difficult for much of the year. An additional challenge was the rapid depreciation of the US dollar against most major currencies which had a significant effect on our earnings. Periods of US dollar weakness have been typically associated with stronger commodity prices. We saw metals prices responding to the weaker dollar in the second half of the year. However, our US based businesses benefited from higher copper and gold prices without incurring additional production costs.
Demand for iron ore, alumina, coking coal and diamonds has been strong. Towards the end of the year there was improved demand and prices for thermal coal from Australia.
The unprecedented demand for iron ore is stretching our infrastructure. Capacity and infrastructure expansions at Hamersley Iron and Robe River are under way involving expenditure of more than US$1 billion.
Strategy
Rio
Tinto has had a very consistent strategy resulting in long term shareholder
returns superior to those delivered by most of our peers. Fundamentally,
we remain convinced that our competitive advantage is in mining, and that
returns are best in the upstream part of the industry.
Furthermore,
we believe that the best returns are delivered by large, long life, low
cost orebodies that often have the potential for further development in
the future. In order to maximise the value of these high quality assets
we focus on operational excellence. Our growth comes from creating options
and recognising opportunities. We do not set growth targets but look at
the quality of each investment opportunity on its merits.
The
strength of our balance sheet coupled with the resilience of our cash flows
enables us to invest in projects throughout the economic cycle. Across
our portfolio we have a range of value creating opportunities and numerous
options for future growth.
New
projects
Because
our strength lies in long life assets, we have the capability in the current
environment to increase production in line with demand. We have recently
invested heavily in copper, alumina, iron ore and diamonds. We are
especially pleased with the Diavik diamond project in Canada, which reinforces
our
position
in the diamond industry. We opened the Hail Creek coking coal mine in Australia
just as demand was firming and Comalcos
alumina refinery in Australia, which will make us a major player in the alumina
market, is on track to ship its first product in early 2005.
Opportunities to invest have been enhanced considerably by Chinas
ongoing demand for raw materials. While there will undoubtedly be hiccups
along Chinas growth path, fundamentally we believe the underlying trend
for industrialisation in China presents a significant opportunity for the
mining industry. We have positioned Rio Tinto to take its fair share of a
market, the size of which has no precedent in our industry.
Hail Creek coking coal is a huge resource, giving us options for expansion as market demand allows. In iron ore, we are expanding capacity significantly. We have options for expansion of the new Comalco Alumina Refinery which will increase the demand for bauxite from Weipa.
In 2003, we pursued opportunities for asset disposals in a patient and disciplined manner. We sold our interests in Minera Alumbrera, Peak Gold, Kaltim Prima Coal and a number of exploration projects that did not fit our investment criteria. The sale of Fortaleza in Brazil was also agreed in 2003.
Following our Exploration groups
evaluation of the large Resolution copper deposit in the US, the project
was transferred to the Copper group in 2003 for further study.
Iron ore
Iron ore shipments were at an all time high, and we celebrated our 30th anniversary of iron ore exports to China. Rio Tinto shipped more than 100 million tonnes of iron ore in 2003.
In December, we announced an investment of US$920 million to increase output at Hamersley Iron. This involves increasing Dampier port capacity to 116 million tonnes per annum by late 2005, from the current 74 million tonnes per annum capacity, and expanding the Yandicoogina mine to produce 36 million tonnes per annum by early 2005 from the 24 million tonnes per annum capacity it will achieve in 2004. The Robe River joint venture approved a US$105 million expansion of the new West Angelas mine from 20 million tonnes per annum to 25 million tonnes.
Rio Tintos
managed iron ore infrastructure capacity in Australia is currently about
130 million tonnes per annum. These investments will take this to about 170
million tonnes by 2006.
Energy
Our
energy businesses were challenged by weak markets for most of 2003. Continuing
pit stability issues affected production in the US. In Australia, the formation
of Rio Tinto Coal
Australia unified management of our coal interests in New South Wales and Queensland.
We increased our production of hard
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 3 |
Chief executives report continued
Net
debt: total
capital
%
coking coal with the commencement of the Hail Creek mine, and the opening of the Ti Tree area at the Kestrel mine. Chinese steel mills have shown considerable interest in the Hail Creek product, indicating potential for a faster ramp up of production than was initially planned.
Industrial minerals
Demand for industrial minerals is related to the performance of mature economies, which have been weak. Market conditions in 2003 were consequently very difficult. To varying degrees, all products borates,
talc, titanium dioxide, salt have had to contend with soft markets in
2003.
In the case of salt and titanium dioxide, the situation has been compounded by new supply and high customer stocks. We have curtailed production and taken action to mitigate the impact of lower production on the cost base, in anticipation of markets continuing to be oversupplied. In the case of our boric acid and upgraded slag expansions, we are allocating resources in areas where we see good opportunities for growth. Our industrial minerals assets are of high quality and capital demands have been low in recent years so cash generation continues to be solid.
Aluminium
In aluminium, our main focus is the development of our alumina business. The options we have to expand mean that we could be a six million tonnes per annum alumina producer within a decade.
Our two major projects in Queensland are working towards this goal. Two years into construction, our new alumina refinery at Gladstone will come on stream at a rate of 1.4 million tonnes per annum late in 2004. Designed to have an ultimate annual capacity of over four million tonnes, we are already looking at a phase two expansion. At Weipa, the source of the high quality bauxite that underpins our alumina business, we are increasing annual production to 16.5 million tonnes from the current capacity of 12 million tonnes. Three million tonnes of this capacity is required to support stage one of the new alumina refinery.
Copper
A
slippage and subsequent debris flow at the Grasberg mine in Indonesia
late in the year affected earnings in the fourth quarter. Despite
this event and depressed prices for most of the year, our Copper group
was able to maintain a robust earnings performance. We are well positioned
to benefit from an upturn in the market. We have invested a total of
US$850 million at Palabora,
Escondida, Northparkes and Grasberg, and these projects are expected to be at
full production by 2005.
We have made significant progress at Kennecott Utah Copper in the US to improve performance. The finalisation of a labour agreement in June, work practice changes in the mine, together with the implementation of 12 hour shifts, have resulted in a significant improvement in productivity.
Diamonds
Diamonds have become a major product for Rio Tinto. About a quarter of our exploration expenditure is devoted to the search for diamonds, mainly in Canada, but also in India.
The Diavik diamond mine was completed ahead of schedule and within budget. The process plant reached design throughput of 1.5 million tonnes of ore per annum six months ahead of schedule. We have established a strategic planning team separate from mine operations to look at options, including underground mining and construction of a second dike to open a third kimberlite pipe.
Initial production from Diavik entered a robust diamond market and we have enjoyed good sales volumes and prices significantly higher than the feasibility study projections. At the same time, Argyle in Australia benefited from the sale of stockpiled inventory.
Safety, health,
environment
and communities
We
place the utmost importance on health and safety in the workplace. While our
record compares very well with our own and other industries, the rate of improvement
towards our goal of zero injuries levelled off in 2003. Rigorous compliance with
the Rio Tinto safety standards and increased visible
4 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
leadership
from all levels of management is expected. The 2003 winners of the Chief Executives
Safety Award were US Boraxs Boron mine in California, Rio Tinto Brasils
Morro do Ouro gold mine and Comalcos Tiwai Point aluminium smelter in
New Zealand. The award recognises outstanding performance as a leadership example
for other Group operations.
Despite
our strenuous efforts, I very much regret to have to report that there were
six deaths at operations we manage in 2003; three were Group employees and
three were contractors. There were 468 lost time incidents during the year,
a four per cent decrease from 2002. The frequency rate was 0.81 compared with
0.85 in 2002.
By
the end of 2003, 80 per cent of our managed operations had implemented the
ISO 14001 environmental management system (EMS) or equivalent. We are now requiring
all operations to certify their EMS by mid 2005. To complement the safety standards
we are implementing Group wide occupational health and environment standards.
We are targeting fewer workplace exposures and new cases of occupational disease.
We seek improved efficiency of greenhouse gas emissions, energy use and fresh
water withdrawn from the environment. Specific five year targets have been
integrated into business plans to ensure that fully resourced and costed action
plans are in place to achieve them.
We made further progress in integrating sustainable development practices and approaches into our activities. Most businesses have appointed cross functional teams to implement a sustainable development framework appropriate to local circumstances, and efforts are being made to formalise the incorporation of relevant criteria into key business decisions.
All
of our businesses continued to report social and environmental performance
to their local communities. Increasingly, this includes community verification.
Outlook
While
2003 was challenging, the Groups
strong fundamentals ensured a satisfactory operating and financial result. We
are ready to
benefit
from improving economic conditions.
In
2003, the world economy ended in better shape, with growth in China being a
significant factor. Together with the cyclical upswing in the US and in other
developed economies, significant pressure is being exerted on mineral raw materials
markets. Iron ore and coking coal are particularly short whilst copper is getting
rapidly tighter. Deferral
of production at Grasberg due to the slippage event will, however, affect copper
production.
The
major economic uncertainty ahead lies in the currency markets, both with
respect to possible impacts on our costs expressed in US dollars, and the
responses which further moves in exchange rates might provoke from economic
policy makers.
Our
natural hedge against the weakening US dollar provided by strengthening
prices for our diverse product range protects us to some extent, as does
our policy of borrowing at floating interest rates, but the relative value
of the US dollar remains a key uncertainty.
Considering
the expansion plans we have announced, and the strong outlook for a number
of our products on the back of growth in China, we see a promising medium
to long term outlook, with our performance underpinned by some of the best
mining assets in the world.
Finally,
whatever the mix of challenge and opportunity, I am delighted to be supported
by a very strong management team and employees of the highest calibre.
In the end, it is the quality of people that makes the difference in delivering
long term value. Recognising this, we are increasing our focus on developing a cadre of future leaders. I believe that Rio Tinto is exceptionally well placed in this regard to continue to deliver value to our shareholders.
Leigh Clifford Chief executive
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 5 |
Selected financial data for Rio Tinto Group for the period 1999 to 2003 |
Gross turnover
US$m
Graph |
Cash
flow from
operations
US$m
Capital
expenditure and
financial investment
US$m
Adjusted
earnings
US$m
A reconciliation
of
adjusted earnings with
net earnings is
included on page 82.
Net
earnings
US$m
Net earnings
in 2001,
2002 and 2003 were
after exceptional items.
Adjusted
earnings
per share
US
cents
Net earnings
per share
US
cents
Dividends
per share
US cents
UK pence
Australian cents
Shareholders funds
Total
capital
US$m
Net debt: total
capital
%
6 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Risk factors and cautionary statement
RISK FACTORS
The
following describes some of the risks that could affect Rio Tinto. In addition,
some risks may be unknown to Rio Tinto and other risks, currently believed
to be immaterial, could turn out to be material. These risks, whether individual
or simultaneous occurrences, could significantly affect the Groups business
and financial results. They should also be considered in connection with any
forward looking statements in this document and the cautionary statement below.
Economic conditions
Commodity
prices, and demand for the Groups products, are influenced strongly by
world economic growth, particularly that in the US and China. The Groups
normal policy is to sell its products at prevailing market prices. Commodity
prices can fluctuate widely and could have a material and adverse impact on
the Groups asset values, revenues, earnings and cash flows. Further discussion
can be found on page 11, Business environment and markets, and on page 34,
Commodity prices.
Exchange rates
The
Groups assets, earnings and cash flows are influenced by a wide variety
of currencies due to the geographic diversity of the Groups sales and
the countries in which it operates. The US dollar is the currency in which
the majority of the Groups sales are denominated. The Australian and
US dollars are the most important currencies influencing costs. The relative
value of currencies can fluctuate widely and could have a material and adverse
impact on the Groups revenues, earnings and cash flows. Further discussion
can be found on page 34, Exchange rates, reporting currencies and currency
exposure.
Acquisitions
The Group has grown partly through the acquisition of other businesses. There are numerous risks commonly encountered in business combinations and Rio Tinto cannot ensure that management will be able effectively to integrate businesses acquired, or generate the cost savings and synergies anticipated. Failure to do so could have a material and adverse impact on the Groups costs, earnings and cash flows.
Exploration and new projects
The
Group seeks to identify new mining properties through an active exploration
programme. However, there is no guarantee that such expenditure will be recouped
or that the existing mineral reserves will be replaced. Failure to do so could
have a material and adverse impact on the Groups financial results and
prospects.
The Group develops new mining properties and expands its existing operations as a means of generating shareholder value. However, there are increasing regulatory, environmental and
social approvals required that can potentially result in significant increases in construction costs and/or significant delays in construction. These increases could materially and adversely impact upon a projects economics, the Groups asset values, costs, earnings and cash flows.
Reserve estimation
There
are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating ore reserves. Reserves that
are valid at the time of estimation may change significantly when new information
becomes available. Fluctuations in the price of commodities, exchange rates,
increased production costs or reduced recovery rates may render lower grade
reserves uneconomic and may, ultimately, result in a restatement. A significant
restatement could have a material and adverse impact on the Groups asset
values, costs, cash flows and earnings.
Political and community
The Group has operations in some countries where varying degrees of political instability exist. Political instability can result in civil unrest, expropriation, nationalisation, renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts, mining leases and permits or other agreements, changes in laws, taxation policies or currency restrictions. Any of these can have a material adverse impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the viability of an operation.
Some
of the Groups current and potential operations are located in or near communities
that may now, or in the future, regard such an operation as having a detrimental
effect on their economic and social circumstances. Should this occur, it might
have a material adverse impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the
viability of an operation. In addition, such an event may adversely affect the
Groups ability to enter into new operations.
Technology
The Group has invested in and conducts information system and operational initiatives. Several technical aspects of these initiatives are still unproven and the eventual operational outcome or commercial viability cannot be assessed with certainty.
Accordingly, the costs and benefits from participating and investing in new technologies and the consequent effects on the Groups
future earnings and financial results may vary widely from present expectations.
Land and resource tenure
The
Group operates in several countries where title to land and rights in respect
of land and resources (including indigenous title) are sometimes unclear and
disputes may arise over resource development. Such disputes could disrupt some
mining projects and/or impede the Groups ability to develop new mining
properties.
Health, safety and environment
Rio Tinto operates in an industry that is subject to numerous health, safety and environmental laws and regulations and community expectations. Evolving regulatory standards and expectations can result in increased litigation and/or increased capital, operating, compliance and remediation costs all of which can have a material and adverse impact on earnings and cash flows.
Mining operations
Mining
operations are vulnerable to a number of circumstances beyond the Groups
control, including transport disruption, weather and other natural disasters
such as cyclones and flooding, unexpected maintenance problems, collapse or
damage to pit walls, unexpected geological variations and industrial actions.
These can affect costs at particular mines for varying periods. Mining, smelting
and refining processes also rely on key inputs, for example fuel and electricity.
Appropriate insurance can provide protection from some, but not all, of the
costs that may arise from unforeseen events. Disruption to the supply of key
inputs, or changes in their pricing, may have a material and adverse impact
on the Groups costs, earnings and cash flows.
Rehabilitation
Costs
associated with rehabilitating land disturbed during the mining process and
addressing environmental, health and community issues are estimated and provided
for based on the most current information available. However, there is a risk
that estimates may be insufficient and/or further issues may be identified.
Any underestimated or unidentified rehabilitation costs will reduce earnings
and could materially and adversely affect the Groups financial results
and cash flows.
Non
managed operations
Rio
Tinto cannot guarantee that local management of mining and processing assets
where it does not have managerial control will comply with the Groups
standards or objectives, nor that they continually maintain effective policies,
procedures and controls, including disclosure and reporting controls, over
their assets.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ABOUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
document contains certain forward looking statements with respect to the financial
condition, results of operations and business of the Rio Tinto Group. The words intend, aim, project, anticipate, estimate, plan, believes, expects, may, should, will,
or similar expressions, commonly identify such forward looking statements.
Examples of forward looking statements in this Annual report include those
regarding estimated reserves, anticipated production or construction commencement
dates, costs, outputs and productive lives of
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 7 |
Risk factors and cautionary statement continued
assets
or similar factors. Forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, assumptions and other factors set forth in this document that
are beyond the Groups control. For example, future reserves will be
based in part on market prices that may vary significantly from current levels.
These may materially affect the timing and feasibility of particular developments.
Other factors include the ability to produce and transport products profitably,
the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on market prices and operating
costs, and activities by governmental authorities, such as changes in taxation
or regulation, and political uncertainty.
In
light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, actual results could
be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by these
forward looking statements. The Group does not undertake any obligation to
publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result
of new information or future events. The Group cannot guarantee that its forward
looking statements will not differ materially from actual results.
8 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
About Rio Tinto
INTRODUCTION
Rio
Tinto Limited and Rio Tinto plc operate as one business organisation, referred
to, in this report as Rio
Tinto,
the Rio
Tinto Group or,
more simply, the
Group.
These collective expressions are used for convenience only since both Companies
and the individual companies in which they directly or indirectly own investments
are separate and distinct legal entities.
Limited,
plc, Pty, Inc, Limitada, or
SA has generally been omitted from Group company names, except
to distinguish between Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited.
Financial
data in United States dollars (US$) is derived from, and should be read in
conjunction with, the Rio Tinto Groups
consolidated financial statements which are in US$. In general, financial
data in pounds sterling (£) and Australian dollars (A$) has been translated
from the consolidated financial statements at the rates shown on page 153
and has been provided solely for convenience; exceptions arise where data,
such as directors remuneration, can be extracted directly from source
records. Certain key information has been provided in all three currencies
on page 136.
Rio
Tinto Group turnover, profit before tax and net earnings, and operating assets
for 2002 and 2003 attributable to the Groups
products and geographical areas, are shown in notes 26 and 27 to the Financial
statements on pages 106 to 110. In the Operational review, operating assets
and turnover are consistent with the financial information by business unit
on pages 132 and 133.
The
tables on pages 13 to 16 show production for 2001, 2002 and 2003 and include
estimates of proved and probable reserves and mineral resources. The weights
and measures used are mainly metric units; conversions into other units are
shown on page 153. Words and phrases, often technical, have been used which
have particular meanings; definitions of these terms are on pages 150 to
152.
AN
OVERVIEW OF RIO TINTO
Rio
Tinto is a leading international mining group, combining Rio Tinto plc and
Rio Tinto Limited in a dual listed companies (DLC) structure as a single economic
entity.
Nevertheless,
both Companies remain legal entities with separate share listings and registers.
Rio Tinto plc is incorporated in England and Wales and Rio Tinto Limited is
incorporated in Australia.
Rio
Tintos
international headquarters is in London whilst the Australian representative
office in Melbourne provides support for operations, undertakes external and
investor relations and fulfils statutory obligations there. For legal purposes,
Rio Tintos US agent is Shannon Crompton, Secretary of Rio Tintos
US holding companies, 8309 West 3595 South, Magna, Utah 84044. Investor relations
in the US are provided by Makinson Cowell US Limited, One Penn Plaza, 250
W 34th St,
Suite
1935, New York, NY 10119.
Rio
Tintos
address and telephone details are shown on the inside back cover of this report.
Objective,
strategy and management structure
Rio
Tintos fundamental objective is to maximise the overall long term return
to its shareholders by operating responsibly and sustainably in areas of
proven
expertise where the Group has competitive advantage. Its strategy is to maximise
the net present value per share by investing in large, long life, cost competitive
mines. Investments are driven by the quality of opportunity, not choice of
commodity.
Rio
Tintos
substantial mining interests are diverse both in geography and product. The
Group consists of wholly and partly owned subsidiaries, joint ventures, associated
companies and joint arrangements, the principal ones being listed in notes
31 to 34 of the Financial statements on pages 118 to 120.
Rio
Tintos
management structure is designed to facilitate a clear focus on business performance
and the Groups objective. The management structure, which is reflected
in this report, is based on principal product and global support groups:
• | Iron Ore |
• | Energy |
• | Aluminium |
• | Copper |
• | Diamonds |
• | Exploration, and |
• | Technology. |
The chief executive of each group reports to the chief executive of Rio Tinto. |
2003
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
On
31 December 2003, Rio Tinto plc had a market capitalisation of £16.5
billion (US$29.3 billion) and Rio Tinto Limited had a market capitalisation
of A$18.6 billion (US$13.9 billion). The combined Groups market capitalisation
in publicly held shares at the end of 2003 was US$38.0 billion.
At
31 December 2003, Rio Tinto had consolidated operating assets of US$15.8
billion; 56 per cent were located in Australia and New Zealand and 31 per cent
in North
America. Group turnover, or sales revenue, in 2003 was US$11.8 billion (or
US$9.2 billion excluding Rio Tintos
share of joint ventures and associates turnover). Net earnings
in 2003 were US$1,508 million.
History
Rio Tinto
plc was formed in 1962 by the merger of two English companies, The Rio Tinto
Company and The Consolidated Zinc Corporation. At the same time, the Australian
interests of these two companies were also merged to form Rio Tinto Limited.
The
Rio Tinto Company was formed in 1873 to mine ancient copper workings at Rio
Tinto in southern Spain. The
Consolidated
Zinc Corporation was incorporated in 1905, initially to treat zinc bearing
mine waste at Broken Hill, New South Wales, Australia.
Between
1962 and 1995, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited discovered important mineral
deposits, developed major mining projects and also grew through acquisition.
Their DLC merger in 1995 was structured to ensure that, as far as possible,
the shareholders of both Companies are in substantially the same economic
position as if they held shares in a single enterprise which owns all the
Companies
assets. A more detailed description of the DLC can be found on page 77.
Following
the DLC merger, Rio Tinto has continued to invest in developments and acquisitions
in keeping with its strategy.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
Share buybacks and issues 2003
In April
2003, Rio Tinto plc shareholders renewed approvals for the buyback of up to
ten per cent of its own shares. Rio Tinto Limited is authorised by shareholder
approvals obtained in 1999 to buy back up to 100 per cent of Rio Tinto Limited
shares held by Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary
of Rio Tinto plc) plus, on market, and up to ten per cent of the publicly
held capital in any 12 month period.
Rio
Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited will seek renewal of their existing shareholder
approvals at their respective annual general meetings in 2004. The number
of shares, if any, which may be bought back under these authorities will continue
to be determined by the directors, based on what they consider to be in the
best interests of the continuing shareholders.
In
the year to 31 December 2003, neither Rio Tinto plc nor Rio Tinto Limited
purchased any publicly held shares for cancellation in either Company. However,
a further 1,192,702 Rio Tinto plc and 240,466 Rio Tinto Limited shares were
issued in respect of the Companies
employee share plans. During the year, options for a further 2,696,000 Rio
Tinto plc and 1,627,000 Rio Tinto Limited shares were granted under Rio Tintos
share plans.
Share
buybacks and issues 2001-2002
In
2001, 398,000 Rio Tinto plc and 10,000 Rio Tinto Limited shares were issued
in connection with the completion of the acquisition of Ashton Mining.
An
additional 681,000 Rio Tinto plc and 79,000 Rio Tinto Limited shares were
issued in respect of the Companies employee
share plans which were extended to subsidiary companies worldwide. In aggregate,
approximately 24 per cent of eligible employees took out a savings
contract for a fixed monthly amount over periods of up to five years and
were granted options over 1.0 million Rio Tinto plc shares and 1.4 million Rio
Tinto Limited shares.
Rio
Tinto plc converted its share warrants
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 9 |
About Rio Tinto continued
to
bearer to registered ordinary shares in June 2001.
In
2002, a further 887,000 Rio Tinto plc and 360,000 Rio Tinto Limited shares
were issued in respect of the Companies
employee share plans and options were granted over 2.6 million Rio Tinto plc
shares and 2.2 million Rio Tinto Limited shares.
During
2001-2002, neither Rio Tinto plc nor Rio Tinto Limited purchased any publicly
held shares for cancellation in either Company.
Operations
divested 2003
The sale
of Rio Tintos 25 per cent interest in Minera Alumbrera Limited in Argentina,
together with its wholly owned Peak Gold mine in New South Wales, Australia,
was completed in March 2003. Cash consideration was US$210 million.
On
21 July 2003 Rio Tinto and BP announced that they had agreed to sell their
interests in Kaltim Prima Coal for a cash price of US$500 million, including
assumed debt, to PT Bumi Resources, a public company listed on the Jakarta
and Surabaya Stock Exchanges. The sale was completed on
10
October and each company received 50 per cent of the net proceeds.
Rio
Tinto announced in late December the sale of its 100 per cent interest in
the nickel mining and smelting company Mineração
Serra da Fortaleza in Brazil. The final consideration, which is dependent
on the forward nickel price, is expected to be at least US$90 million. The
transaction was completed during January 2004.
Operations
acquired and divested 2001 2002
In January
2001, Coal & Allied Industries acquired the Peabody Groups Australian
coal businesses for US$455 million and the assumption of US$100 million in
debt. Rio
Tinto acquired an additional 1.83 per cent interest in Coal & Allied on
market for US$15 million in March 2001.
In
April 2001, Rio Tintos
50 per cent share of the Norzink smelter was sold for an after tax gain of
US$54 million.
Rio
Tinto sold North Forest Products for US$171 million in May. Following a review,
Rio Tinto also sold its 34.8 per cent interest in Aurora Gold as well as other
minority interests acquired with Ashton Mining whilst increasing its interest
in Ashton Mining of Canada to 63.8 per cent.
Rio
Tintos
offer resulted in it purchasing, for US$56 million, units representing 20.3
per cent of the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Income Fund (LIORF).
In
July, Rio Tinto purchased additional shares in Palabora Mining, increasing
its interest by some 0.7 per cent to 49.2 per cent.
Dampier
Salt acquired Cargill Australias
Port Hedland operation for US$95 million and contingent performance payments
not exceeding US$15 million in aggregate.
With
effect from September 2001, Comalco acquired an additional 8.3 per cent in
Queensland Alumina for US$189 million,
taking
its overall interest to 38.6 per cent. Rio Tinto acquired the Three Springs
talc mine in Western Australia for US$28 million in the same month.
In
January 2002, Kennecott Energy (KEC) purchased the North Jacobs Ranch coal
reserves for US$380 million, payable in installments over a five year period.
The reserves are adjacent to KECs
existing Jacobs Ranch operation and provide a basis for low cost expansion
in line with market demand.
Following
the purchase of outstanding units in the Western Australian Diamond Trust,
Rio Tintos
interest in Argyle Diamonds increased from 99.8 per cent to 100 per cent.
In
August, Comalco completed the acquisition of an additional 9.5 per cent interest
in reduction lines 1 and 2 of the Boyne Island Smelter for US$78.5 million.
This increased Comalcos
share in lines 1 and 2 of the smelter to 59.5 per cent from 50 per cent. The
interest in line 3 remained unchanged at 59.25 per cent.
During
the first half of 2002, Coal & Allied completed the sale of its interest
in the Moura Joint Venture for US$166 million and in Narama and Ravensworth
for US$64 million. These were classified as assets held for resale and consequently
their disposal had no effect on net earnings. In September, Rio Tinto acquired
for cash in the market a further three per cent in Coal & Allied to bring
its shareholding to 75.7 per cent.
As
a result of a refinancing in December 2002, in which LIORF chose not to participate,
Rio Tintos
interest in Iron Ore Company of Canada increased from 56.1 to 58.7 per cent.
Development
projects 2003
Rio Tinto
invested US$1.6 billion in 2003 on capital projects around the world.
The
Diavik diamond project in the Northwest Territories, Canada, was completed
well ahead of schedule and within budget. Initial production commenced from
the contact zone above the orebody with the main orebody accessed during the
second half of 2003.
Construction
of the US$100 million second block cave at the underground Northparkes copper
gold mine in New South Wales, Australia was delayed by ground control problems.
Production from the first underground block cave ceased in early 2003 to be
replaced by the Lift 2 block cave which is expected to commence production
in 2004.
Production
ramp up at Palaboras
US$460 million underground copper mine in South Africa was constrained by
an inability to clear drawpoints blocked by poorly fragmented, large rocks.
Further work resulted in design capacity of 30,000 tonnes per day being reached
intermittently by the end of 2003.
Development
of the Escondida Norte satellite deposit at the 30 per cent owned Escondida
copper mine in Chile was started
in
June 2003 to provide mill feed to keep Escondidas capacity above
1.2 million tonnes of copper per year to the end of 2008. First production
is
expected by the end of 2005. Commissioning of the new US$1,045 million, 110,000
tonnes of ore per day Laguna Seca concentrator was completed in the second
quarter of 2003.
Expansion
of the Weipa bauxite mine in Queensland, Australia, is underway to increase
production capacity to 16.5 million tonnes per year in support of the requirements
of the new Comalco Alumina Refinery. A key component of the US$150 million
expenditure is a 9.5 million tonne beneficiation plant to allow mining of
lower grade ores. The project is expected to be completed in 2004.
Construction
of Comalcos
US$750
million alumina refinery at Gladstone, Queensland, proceeds on schedule with
US$576 million spent to date. Initial shipments from the 1.4 million tonne
per year plant are expected in early 2005. Options exist to expand capacity
to more than four million tonnes per year.
Pacific
Coal completed development of the US$255 million Hail Creek coking coal project
in Queensland, Australia with a capacity of 5.5 million tonnes annually.
Construction
began in January 2003 on an expanded US$200 million HIsmelt® plant
at Kwinana in Western Australia. The plant is expected to be commissioned
in late 2004 and reach full production of 800,000 tonnes of iron per year
in the first half of 2006.
Development
of the 54 per cent owned Eastern Range iron ore mine with a capacity of ten
million tonnes per year continued. First shipments are expected in the first
half of 2004.
In
the first quarter of 2003, Freeport Indonesia completed an expansion to 35,000
tonnes of ore per day of its Deep Ore Zone (DOZ) project at a cost of US$34
million.
Kennecott
Lands
Project Daybreak in Utah, US, a mixed use land development on a 1,800 hectare
site, was commenced in 2003 with land sales planned to start in 2004 and
ramp
up over a period of five to six years.
A
major US$920 million expansion of Hamersley Irons
Dampier port and Yandicoogina mine in Western Australia was announced during
December 2003. Further
detail on these investments and projects is provided in the Operational review
on pages 37 to 56.
Development
projects have been funded using the US commercial paper market, the 2003
bond issue, the European medium term note facility and internally generated
funds.
Development
projects 2001 2002
In the
US, Kennecott Utah Copper closed its North Concentrator in December 2001.
Work
on the Robe River Joint Ventures
US$450 million West Angelas iron ore mine and port facilities in Western
Australia was completed in mid 2002 and the first shipments were made. The
mine is expected
10 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
to
be operating at an annualised rate of 20 million tonnes by the end of the
first quarter of 2004, two years earlier than originally scheduled. The Robe
River partners agreed to share rail infrastructure with Hamersley Iron.
Freeport
Indonesias
Deep Ore Zone (DOZ) underground block cave project was declared fully operational
from 1 October, 2002. This achieved design capacity of 25,000 tonnes of ore
per day in 2002, a year earlier than originally projected.
Pacific
Coal began development of the Hail Creek coking coal project in Queensland,
Australia.
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
AND MARKETS
Overview
The
world economy continued its uncertain recovery in 2003, global output rising
3.3 per cent, slightly more than the three per cent of 2002. The volume of
world trade grew at around three per cent, similar to the rate achieved in
2002, but well below the six per cent average of the previous 20 years.
The
year began slowly with uncertainties over the strength of the US economy and
mounting concerns over the possible impact of a war with Iraq causing growth
in OECD countries to stall. Successive US interest rates cuts, coupled with
tax cuts and the conclusion of the war in April, helped to reverse the trend,
producing a very much stronger second half of the year.
Low
interest rates in particular helped boost the housing market and support US
consumer spending. The renewed strength of US demand, however, aggravated
the countrys
already sizeable current account imbalance and pushed down the US dollar,
particularly against the euro and against the currencies of commodity producing
countries such as Australia, Canada and South Africa.
The
economies of Europe and Japan followed a similar pattern to that of the US,
only in a weaker form and with a lag. Growth in the euro zone was restrained
by the maintenance of a relatively tight economic policy environment and by
the impact on export growth of the strong euro. Germany, the largest economy
in Europe, recorded three negative quarters of growth up to the middle of
2003 and, for the year as a whole, failed to grow at all. Like Europe, Japan
also suffered from weak domestic demand although in contrast to Europe its
exports enjoyed the benefits of strong import demand from China. Japans
GDP for the year as a whole rose a surprisingly robust 2.3 per cent.
Much
the most dynamic market during the year was China. Despite suffering the disruptive
effects of an outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) through
the second quarter, China bounced back to record another remarkable year of
economic growth. Lifted by high levels of investment and rapidly growing exports,
GDP grew nine per cent while industrial production was up 17 per cent. The
emphasis of Chinas
growth
on
materials intensive sectors of industry and construction resulted in the demand
for a number of metals, including steel, copper and aluminium, rising by over
20 per cent during the year.
With
China providing a consistent underpinning of global demand for mineral commodities,
the gradual recovery in demand in the OECD countries during the second half
of the year produced a quickening of the pace in commodity markets, leading
them to end the year on a generally high note.
The
market for seaborne iron ore enjoyed another strong year, its fourth successive
year of growth, assisted by a 33 per cent increase in Chinas
ore imports. After producers achieved a price increase of around nine per
cent during the annual contract negotiations in May, the market continued
to tighten. The high level of deliveries also created acute pressures in the
market for bulk shipping resulting in record freight rates.
The
seaborne market for steam coal started the year more slowly and contract prices
in the Asian market were reduced for the second year in succession. As the
year progressed, however, market conditions began to improve and by the fourth
quarter, with the strength of domestic demand restricting Chinas
capacity to export, spot prices surged ahead of contract levels.
With
demand concentrated more heavily on the more mature economies, the market
for industrial minerals such as borates and titanium dioxide did not experience
the full benefit of Chinas
robust economic performance. Although the second half of the year represented
an improvement on the first, rates of demand growth generally fell short of
those achieved by metals.
Responding
to the broader trends of the global economy, the markets for non ferrous metals
stalled in their upward course during March and April, before climbing from
May through to the end of the year. Firming demand and declining stocks helped
underpin this shift in the market, but prices also appear to have been boosted
by fund buying in anticipation of future economic growth and US dollar weakness.
Global
demand for copper increased around four per cent during 2003, China being
by far the worlds
strongest market. With mine output restrained by the low level of investment
in recent years, refined metal production was unable to respond to rising
demand and metal stocks fell around 300,000 tonnes. Spot prices trended upwards
for most of the year, achieving an average of 80.7 US cents a pound for the
year as a whole compared to 70.6 US cents in 2002.
Demand
growth for aluminium in 2003, at eight per cent, was even more buoyant than
that for copper. However, strong Chinese production of aluminium meant that
the market did not experience coppers
deficits. Price growth for aluminium was accordingly more subdued, an average
spot price of
65 US
cents per pound compared with 61
US cents per pound in 2002. The spot price for alumina, the raw material for
producing aluminium, rose very sharply during the year and by the end of the
year a shortage of alumina was beginning to constrain world metal output.
Like
non ferrous metals, gold felt the effects of growing speculative influences
and the weakening of the US dollar. Prices rose through much of the year.
The average price for the year was US$363 per ounce, compared with US$309
in 2002. Also helping to support prices, a number of gold producers who had
previously hedged their gold sales bought back their positions, effectively
adding to gold demand.
A
discussion of the financial results for the three years to 31 December 2003
is given in the Financial review on pages 32 to 36. Comments on the financial
performance of the individual product groups for the three years to 31 December
2003 are included in the Operational review on pages 37 to 56. Details of
production, reserves and resources, and information on Group mines are given
on pages 13 to 24 and 26 to 31, respectively. Analyses of Rio Tintos
revenues by product group, geographical origin and geographical destination
have been set out in Financial information by business unit on page 132 and
note 27 to the Financial statements on pages 108 to 110.
Marketing
channels
Each
business within each product group is responsible for the marketing and sale
of their respective metal and mineral production. Rio Tinto therefore has
numerous marketing channels, which now include electronic marketplaces, with
differing characteristics and pricing mechanisms.
In
general, Rio Tintos
businesses contract their metal and mineral production direct to end users
under long term supply contracts and at prevailing market prices. Typically,
these contracts specify annual volume commitments and an agreed mechanism
for determining prices, for example, businesses producing non ferrous metals
and minerals reference their sales prices to the London Metal Exchange (LME)
or other metal exchanges such as the Commodity Exchange Inc (Comex) in New
York. Fluctuations in these prices, particularly for aluminium, copper and
gold, inevitably affect the Groups financial results.
Businesses
producing iron ore would typically reference their sales prices to annually
negotiated industry benchmarks. In markets where international reference market
prices do not exist or are not transparent, businesses negotiate product prices
on an individual customer basis.
Rio
Tintos
marketing channels include a network of regional sales offices worldwide.
Some products in certain geographical markets are sold via third party agents
or to major trading companies.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 11 |
About Rio Tinto continued
Governmental regulations
Rio
Tinto is subject to extensive governmental regulations that affect all aspects
of its operations, and consistently seeks to apply best practice in all of
its activities. Due to Rio Tintos
product and geographical spread, there is unlikely to be any single governmental
regulation that could have a material effect on the Groups business.
Native
title has, since 1992, been accepted as a part of Australias
common law. The Native Title Act 1993 provides, amongst other things, a framework
for the validation of title, including mining tenements, that might be affected
by the existence of native title; the determination of native title claims;
a right to negotiate process with respect to the grant of new
exploration and mining tenements and certain compulsory acquisitions of land;
and the negotiation and registration of indigenous land use agreements.
US
based operations are subject to local environmental legislation.
The
South African Department of Mines has published a scorecard by
which companies will be judged on their progress with black economic empowerment
and the attainment, for value, of the target for 26 per cent ownership in
ten years. In addition, new royalty payments are to be introduced that will
be calculated on a gross sales value basis in relation to any minerals extracted.
12 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Metals and minerals production
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
Production (a) | Production (a) | Production (a) | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto | Total | Rio Tinto | Total | Rio Tinto | Total | Rio Tinto | ||||||||
% share (b) | share | share | share | |||||||||||
ALUMINA (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Eurallumina (Italy) | 56.2 | 993 | 557 | 1,010 | 567 | 1,021 | 573 | |||||||
Queensland Alumina (Australia) (c) | 38.6 | 3,624 | 1,204 | 3,574 | 1,380 | 3,731 | 1,440 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 1,761 | 1,947 | 2,014 | |||||||||||
ALUMINIUM (refined) (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Anglesey (UK) | 51.0 | 139.3 | 71.0 | 139.3 | 71.1 | 144.8 | 73.9 | |||||||
Bell Bay (Australia) | 100.0 | 160.8 | 160.8 | 163.9 | 163.9 | 166.6 | 166.6 | |||||||
Boyne Island (Australia) (d) | 59.4 | 508.9 | 277.5 | 520.2 | 294.6 | 520.9 | 311.1 | |||||||
Tiwai Point (New Zealand) | 79.4 | 322.3 | 256.2 | 333.9 | 265.9 | 334.4 | 266.5 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 765.6 | 795.4 | 818.1 | |||||||||||
BAUXITE (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Boké (Guinea) | 4.0 | 11,987 | 469 | 12,041 | 482 | 12,060 | 418 | |||||||
Weipa (Australia) | 100.0 | 11,326 | 11,326 | 11,241 | 11,241 | 11,898 | 11,898 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 11,795 | 11,724 | 12,316 | |||||||||||
BORATES (000 tonnes) (e) | ||||||||||||||
Boron mine (US) | 100.0 | 549 | 549 | 514 | 514 | 541 | 541 | |||||||
Borax Argentina (Argentina) | 100.0 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 17 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 564 | 528 | 559 | |||||||||||
COAL (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Coal & Allied Industries (f) | ||||||||||||||
Bengalla (Australia) (g) | SC | 30.3 | 4,894 | 1,418 | 5,385 | 1,587 | 6,203 | 1,879 | ||||||
Hunter Valley Operations (Australia) | SC | 75.7 | 8,209 | 5,945 | 9,183 | 6,756 | 9,146 | 6,925 | ||||||
MC | 75.7 | 4,034 | 2,913 | 3,442 | 2,531 | 2,862 | 2,167 | |||||||
Mount Thorley Operations (Australia) | SC | 60.6 | 2,376 | 1,373 | 2,465 | 1,451 | 1,720 | 1,042 | ||||||
MC | 60.6 | 2,171 | 1,255 | 1,827 | 1,073 | 1,432 | 868 | |||||||
Moura (Australia) (g) | SC | | 2,175 | 867 | 1,018 | 407 | | | ||||||
MC | | 2,713 | 1,080 | 1,381 | 552 | | | |||||||
Narama (Australia) (g) | SC | | 2,177 | 789 | 370 | 135 | | | ||||||
Ravensworth East (Australia) (g) | SC | | 1,511 | 1,096 | 387 | 281 | | | ||||||
Warkworth (Australia) (g) | SC | 42.1 | 5,141 | 2,070 | 6,314 | 2,586 | 5,369 | 2,259 | ||||||
MC | 42.1 | 550 | 221 | 568 | 231 | 500 | 210 | |||||||
Total Coal & Allied Industries | 19,026 | 17,590 | 15,348 | |||||||||||
Rio Tinto Coal Australia (h) | ||||||||||||||
Blair Athol (Australia) | SC | 71.2 | 10,592 | 7,546 | 11,809 | 8,412 | 12,480 | 8,890 | ||||||
Hail Creek Coal (Australia) | MC | 92.0 | | | | | 883 | 812 | ||||||
Kestrel Coal (Australia) | SC | 80.0 | 1,202 | 962 | 1,685 | 1,348 | 1,449 | 1,159 | ||||||
MC | 80.0 | 2,068 | 1,654 | 2,406 | 1,925 | 1,873 | 1,499 | |||||||
Tarong Coal (Australia) | SC | 100.0 | 5,276 | 5,276 | 5,685 | 5,685 | 6,538 | 6,538 | ||||||
Total Rio Tinto Coal Australia | 15,437 | 17,370 | 18,898 | |||||||||||
Total Australian coal | 34,464 | 34,960 | 34,246 | |||||||||||
Kaltim Prima Coal (Indonesia) (i) | SC | 0.0 | 15,611 | 7,806 | 17,740 | 8,870 | 12,655 | 6,327 | ||||||
Kennecott Energy | ||||||||||||||
Antelope (US) | SC | 100.0 | 22,344 | 22,344 | 24,319 | 24,319 | 26,806 | 26,806 | ||||||
Colowyo (US) | SC | (j) | 5,231 | 5,231 | 4,889 | 4,889 | 4,535 | 4,535 | ||||||
Cordero Rojo (US) | SC | 100.0 | 39,452 | 39,452 | 34,724 | 34,724 | 32,671 | 32,671 | ||||||
Decker (US) | SC | 50.0 | 8,510 | 4,255 | 9,021 | 4,511 | 7,358 | 3,679 | ||||||
Jacobs Ranch (US) | SC | 100.0 | 26,612 | 26,612 | 28,784 | 28,784 | 32,418 | 32,418 | ||||||
Spring Creek (US) | SC | 100.0 | 8,767 | 8,767 | 8,093 | 8,093 | 8,069 | 8,069 | ||||||
Total US coal | 106,661 | 105,320 | 108,177 | |||||||||||
Rio Tinto total | 148,930 | 149,149 | 148,750 | |||||||||||
Coal type: SC steam/thermal coal, MC metallurgical/coking coal. | ||||||||||||||
See notes on page 16. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 13 |
Metals and minerals production continued
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
Production (a) | Production (a) | Production (a) | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto | Total | Rio Tinto | Total | Rio Tinto | Total | Rio Tinto | ||||||||
% share (b) | share | share | share | |||||||||||
COPPER (mined) (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Alumbrera (Argentina) (k) | 0.0 | 191.6 | 47.9 | 203.7 | 50.9 | 34.9 | 8.7 | |||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | 100.0 | 312.7 | 312.7 | 260.2 | 260.2 | 281.8 | 281.8 | |||||||
Escondida (Chile) | 30.0 | 774.8 | 232.4 | 754.5 | 226.3 | 992.7 | 297.8 | |||||||
Grasberg FCX (Indonesia) (l) | 11.8 | 513.5 | 93.5 | 494.4 | 107.5 | 444.1 | 84.5 | |||||||
Grasberg Joint Venture (Indonesia) (l) | 40.0 | 235.9 | 94.4 | 370.0 | 148.0 | 271.7 | 108.7 | |||||||
Neves Corvo (Portugal) | 49.0 | 82.9 | 40.6 | 77.2 | 37.8 | 77.5 | 38.0 | |||||||
Northparkes (Australia) | 80.0 | 55.1 | 44.1 | 38.4 | 30.7 | 27.1 | 21.7 | |||||||
Palabora (South Africa) (m) | 49.2 | 78.4 | 38.4 | 52.2 | 25.7 | 52.4 | 25.8 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 904.1 | 887.1 | 867.0 | |||||||||||
COPPER (refined) (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Atlantic Copper (Spain) (l) | 13.1 | 235.3 | 39.1 | 250.5 | 41.5 | 247.1 | 38.1 | |||||||
Escondida (Chile) | 30.0 | 151.0 | 45.3 | 138.7 | 41.6 | 147.6 | 44.3 | |||||||
Kennecott Utah Copper (US) | 100.0 | 234.3 | 234.3 | 293.7 | 293.7 | 230.6 | 230.6 | |||||||
Palabora (South Africa) (m) | 49.2 | 86.9 | 42.5 | 81.6 | 40.2 | 73.4 | 36.1 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 361.2 | 416.9 | 349.1 | |||||||||||
DIAMONDS (000 carats) | ||||||||||||||
Argyle (Australia) (n) | 100.0 | 26,097 | 26,045 | 33,519 | 33,503 | 30,910 | 30,910 | |||||||
Diavik (Canada) | 60.0 | | | | | 3,833 | 2,300 | |||||||
Merlin (Australia) | 100.0 | 55 | 55 | 117 | 117 | 62 | 62 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 26,100 | 33,620 | 33,272 | |||||||||||
GOLD (mined) (000 ounces) | ||||||||||||||
Alumbrera (Argentina) (k) | 0.0 | 672 | 168 | 754 | 188 | 124 | 31 | |||||||
Barneys Canyon (US) | 100.0 | 140 | 140 | 75 | 75 | 35 | 35 | |||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | 100.0 | 592 | 592 | 412 | 412 | 305 | 305 | |||||||
Cortez/ Pipeline (US) | 40.0 | 1,188 | 475 | 1,082 | 433 | 1,085 | 434 | |||||||
Escondida (Chile) | 30.0 | 101 | 30 | 126 | 38 | 184 | 55 | |||||||
Grasberg FCX (Indonesia) (l) | 11.8 | 1,397 | 388 | 1,375 | 355 | 1,456 | 354 | |||||||
Grasberg Joint Venture (Indonesia) (l) | 40.0 | 2,199 | 880 | 1,655 | 662 | 1,806 | 722 | |||||||
Greens Creek (US) | 70.3 | 88 | 62 | 103 | 72 | 99 | 70 | |||||||
Kelian (Indonesia) | 90.0 | 453 | 408 | 539 | 485 | 469 | 422 | |||||||
Lihir (Papua New Guinea) (o) | 14.5 | 648 | 105 | 607 | 99 | 551 | 88 | |||||||
Morro do Ouro (Brazil) | 51.0 | 187 | 95 | 225 | 115 | 201 | 103 | |||||||
Northparkes (Australia) | 80.0 | 41 | 33 | 41 | 33 | 49 | 39 | |||||||
Peak (Australia) (k) | 0.0 | 101 | 101 | 97 | 97 | 20 | 20 | |||||||
Rawhide (US) | 51.0 | 101 | 52 | 82 | 42 | 64 | 32 | |||||||
Rio Tinto Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe) | 56.0 | 67 | 38 | 38 | 21 | 25 | 14 | |||||||
Others | | 20 | 10 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 7 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 3,577 | 3,135 | 2,731 | |||||||||||
GOLD (refined) (000 ounces) | ||||||||||||||
Kennecott Utah Copper (US) | 100.0 | 389 | 389 | 488 | 488 | 308 | 308 | |||||||
IRON ORE (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Channar (Australia) | 60.0 | 11,088 | 6,653 | 10,594 | 6,356 | 10,347 | 6,208 | |||||||
Corumbá (Brazil) | 100.0 | 642 | 642 | 858 | 858 | 1,074 | 1,074 | |||||||
Hamersley (Australia) | 100.0 | 58,828 | 58,828 | 57,563 | 57,563 | 63,056 | 63,056 | |||||||
Iron Ore Company of Canada (Canada) (p) | 58.7 | 14,562 | 8,169 | 12,758 | 7,168 | 14,225 | 8,353 | |||||||
Robe River (Australia) | 53.0 | 30,706 | 16,274 | 35,860 | 19,006 | 45,136 | 23,922 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 90,566 | 90,951 | 102,613 | |||||||||||
See notes on page 16. |
14 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
Production (a) | Production (a) | Production (a) | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto | Total | Rio Tinto | Total | Rio Tinto | Total | Rio Tinto | ||||||||
% share (b) | share | share | share | |||||||||||
LEAD (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) | 70.3 | 20.3 | 14.3 | 22.3 | 15.7 | 22.5 | 15.8 | |||||||
Zinkgruvan (Sweden) | 100.0 | 24.5 | 24.5 | 24.7 | 24.7 | 31.8 | 31.8 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 38.8 | 40.4 | 47.6 | |||||||||||
MOLYBDENUM (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | 100.0 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 4.6 | 4.6 | |||||||
NICKEL (mined) (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Fortaleza (Brazil) (q) | 100.0 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.0 | 6.0 | |||||||
NICKEL (refined) (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Empress (Zimbabwe) | 56.0 | 6.6 | 3.7 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 6.2 | 3.5 | |||||||
SALT (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Dampier Salt (Australia) (r) | 64.9 | 6,541 | 4,248 | 7,186 | 4,667 | 7,135 | 4,633 | |||||||
SILVER (mined) (000 ounces) | ||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | 100.0 | 4,475 | 4,475 | 3,663 | 3,663 | 3,548 | 3,548 | |||||||
Escondida (Chile) | 30.0 | 3,198 | 959 | 2,981 | 894 | 4,728 | 1,418 | |||||||
Grasberg FCX (Indonesia) (l) | 11.8 | 3,943 | 700 | 3,795 | 804 | 3,659 | 745 | |||||||
Grasberg Joint Venture (Indonesia) (l) | 40.0 | 1,602 | 641 | 2,607 | 1,043 | 2,815 | 1,126 | |||||||
Greens Creek (US) | 70.3 | 10,964 | 7,703 | 10,912 | 7,668 | 11,707 | 8,226 | |||||||
Zinkgruvan (Sweden) | 100.0 | 1,496 | 1,496 | 1,554 | 1,554 | 1,841 | 1,841 | |||||||
Others | | 3,378 | 1,729 | 3,231 | 1,582 | 2,511 | 1,407 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 17,703 | 17,207 | 18,311 | |||||||||||
SILVER (refined) (000 ounces) | ||||||||||||||
Kennecott Utah Copper (US) | 100.0 | 2,882 | 2,882 | 4,037 | 4,037 | 2,963 | 2,963 | |||||||
TALC (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Luzenac Group (Australia/Europe/N. America) (s) | 99.9 | 1,268 | 1,267 | 1,328 | 1,327 | 1,358 | 1,357 | |||||||
TIN (tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Neves Corvo (Portugal) | 49.0 | 1,201 | 588 | 345 | 169 | 203 | 100 | |||||||
TITANIUM DIOXIDE FEEDSTOCK (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium (Canada/South Africa) (t) | 100.0 | 1,427 | 1,427 | 1,274 | 1,274 | 1,192 | 1,192 | |||||||
URANIUM (tonnes U3O8) | ||||||||||||||
Energy Resources of Australia (Australia) | 68.4 | 4,211 | 2,880 | 4,486 | 3,068 | 5,134 | 3,512 | |||||||
Palabora (South Africa) (m) (u) | 49.2 | 31 | 15 | | | | | |||||||
Rössing (Namibia) | 68.6 | 2,640 | 1,811 | 2,751 | 1,887 | 2,401 | 1,647 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 4,705 | 4,955 | 5,158 | |||||||||||
ZINC (mined) (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) | 70.3 | 58.0 | 40.7 | 66.5 | 46.7 | 69.1 | 48.5 | |||||||
Zinkgruvan (Sweden) | 100.0 | 61.8 | 61.8 | 48.0 | 48.0 | 64.5 | 64.5 | |||||||
Rio Tinto total | 102.5 | 94.7 | 113.0 | |||||||||||
ZINC (refined) (000 tonnes) | ||||||||||||||
Norzink (Norway) (v) | 0.0 | 40.9 | 20.4 | | | | | |||||||
See notes on page 16. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 15 |
Metals and minerals production continued
Production data notes
(a) | Mine production figures for metals refer to the total quantity of metal produced in concentrates or doré bullion irrespective of whether these products are then refined onsite, except for the data for iron ore and bauxite which represent production of saleable quantities of ore. |
(b) | Rio Tinto percentage share, shown above, is as at the end of 2003 and has applied over the period 20012003 except for those operations where the share has varied during the year and the weighted average for them is shown below. The Rio Tinto share varies at individual mines and refineries in the others category and thus no value is shown. |
Rio Tinto share % | |||||||||
Operation | See note | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||||
Atlantic Copper | (l) | 16.6 | 16.5 | 15.4 | |||||
Argyle | (n) | 99.8 | 99.9 | 100.0 | |||||
Bengalla | (f) (g) | 29.0 | 29.4 | 30.3 | |||||
Boyne Island | (d) | 54.2 | 56.6 | 59.4 | |||||
Grasberg | (l) | 14.3 | 15.0 | 13.9 | |||||
Hunter Valley Operations | (f) | 72.4 | 73.6 | 75.7 | |||||
Iron Ore Company of Canada | (p) | 56.1 | 56.2 | 58.7 | |||||
Lihir | (o) | 16.3 | 16.3 | 16.0 | |||||
Mount Thorley Operations | (f) | 57.8 | 58.9 | 60.6 | |||||
Moura | (f) (g) | 39.9 | 40.0 | | |||||
Narama | (f) (g) | 36.2 | 36.4 | | |||||
Palabora | (m) | 49.0 | 49.2 | 49.2 | |||||
Queensland Alumina | (c) | 33.2 | 38.6 | 38.6 | |||||
Ravensworth East | (f) (g) | 72.5 | 72.7 | | |||||
Warkworth | (f) (g) | 40.3 | 41.2 | 42.1 | |||||
(c) | Rio Tinto increased its holding in Queensland Alumina Limited from 30.3 per cent to 38.6 per cent, with effect from September 2001. |
(d) | Rio Tinto acquired an approximately five per cent additional interest in production from the Boyne Island smelter with effect from August 2002. |
(e) | Borate quantities are expressed as B2O3. |
(f) | Rio Tinto increased its stake in Coal & Allied Industries from 70.9 per cent to 72.7 per cent during March 2001 and to 75.7 per cent during September 2002. |
(g) | Production
data are shown from 29 January 2001, the effective date of Coal & Allieds
acquisition of the Australian coal businesses of the Peabody Group. Effective
on the same date, Coal & Allied acquired an additional 11.8 per cent
interest in the Warkworth mine. On 14 March 2002, Coal & Allied completed the sale of its interests in Narama and Ravensworth. Coal & Allied sold its interest in the Moura coal mine with effect from 24 May 2002. Production data are shown up to the dates of sale. |
(h) | Rio Tinto Coal Australia was previously known as Pacific Coal. |
(i) | Rio Tinto had a 50 per cent share in Kaltim Prima Coal and, under the terms of its Coal Agreement, the Indonesian Government was entitled to a 13.5 per cent share of Kaltim Primas production. Rio Tintos share of production shown is before deduction of the Government share. Rio Tinto completed the sale of its interest in Kaltim Prima Coal on 10 October 2003. Production data are shown up to the date of sale. |
(j) | Kennecott Energy has a partnership interest in the Colowyo mine but, as it is responsible under a management agreement for the operation of the mine, all of Colowyos output is included in Rio Tintos share of production. |
(k) | Rio Tinto completed the sale of its 25 per cent interest in Minera Alumbrera together with its wholly owned Peak Gold Mine on 17 March 2003. Production data are shown up to the date of sale. |
(l) | Through its interest in Freeport-McMoRan-Copper & Gold (FCX), Rio Tinto had, as of 31 December 2003, an 11.8 per cent share in the Grasberg mine and a 13.1 per cent share in Atlantic Copper. Through a joint venture agreement with FCX, Rio Tinto is entitled, as shown separately in the above tables, to 40 per cent of additional material mined as a consequence of the expansion of the Grasberg facilities since 1998. |
(m) | Rio Tinto increased its interest in Palabora Mining Company from 48.6 per cent to 49.2 per cent in July 2001. |
(n) | Rio Tinto acquired control of Ashton Mining Limited in late 2000 and as a result of this purchase, Rio Tintos effective interest in Argyle Diamonds became 99.8 per cent. Rio Tintos interest in Argyle Diamonds subsequently increased from 99.8 per cent to 100 per cent on 29 April 2002, following the purchase of the outstanding units in the Western Australian Diamond Trust. |
(o) | Following a placement of shares on the 13 November 2003, Rio Tintos interest in Lihir moved from 16.3 per cent to 14.5 per cent. |
(p) | Rio Tinto increased its shareholding in Iron Ore Company of Canada from 56.1 per cent to 58.7 per cent on 20 December 2002. |
(q) | Rio Tinto completed the sale of its 100 per cent interest in the Fortaleza nickel mine on 16 January 2004. |
(r) | Production from the Port Hedland operation (Dampier Salt 100 per cent) is included from 17 August 2001. |
(s) | Talc production includes some products derived from purchased ores. The Three Springs talc mine in Western Australia was acquired in September 2001 and is included in the data from that date. |
(t) | Quantities comprise 100 per cent of QIT and 50 per cent of Richards Bay Minerals production. |
(u) | Uranium production at Palabora ceased with the closure of the heavy minerals plant in August 2001. |
(v) | Rio Tinto completed the sale of its interest in Norzink on 17 April 2001. |
16 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Ore reserves
Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources in this report (for Rio Tinto managed operations) are reported in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, September 1999 (the JORC Code) as required by the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). Codes or Guidelines similar to JORC with only minor regional variations have been adopted in South Africa, Canada, US, UK, Ireland and Europe and together these represent current best practice for reporting Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources.
The JORC Code envisages the use of reasonable investment assumptions, including the use of projected long term commodity prices, in calculating reserve estimates. However, during 2003 the US Securities and Exchange Commission indicated that for US reporting, historical price data should be used. Only certain operations are affected by this guidance and resulting changes to reserves are shown on page 147.
Ore Reserve and Mineral Resource information in the tables below is based on information compiled by Competent Persons (as defined by JORC), or recognised overseas mining professionals as defined by the ASX, most of whom are full time employees of Rio Tinto or related companies. Each has had a minimum of five years relevant estimation experience and is a member of a recognised professional body whose members are bound by a professional code of ethics. Each Competent Person consents to the inclusion in this report of information they have provided in the form and context in which it appears. A register of the names of the Competent Persons who are responsible for the estimates is maintained by the company secretaries in London and Melbourne and is available on request.
The ore reserve figures in the following tables are as of 31 December 2003. Summary data for year end 2002 are shown for comparison. Metric units are used throughout. The figures used to calculate Rio Tinto's share of reserves are often more precise than the rounded numbers shown in the tables, hence small differences might result if the calculations are repeated using the tabulated figures.
Type of | Proved ore reserves | Probable ore reserves | Total ore reserves 2003 compared with 2002 | Rio Tinto share | ||||||||||||||||||||
mine | at end 2003 | at end 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Interest | Recoverable | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | % | mineral | |||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
BAUXITE (b) | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weipa (Australia) (c) | O/P | 138 | 1,074 | 1,212 | 730 | 100.0 | 1,212 | |||||||||||||||||
Marketable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
product | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
BORATES (d) | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boron (US) | O/P | 24.3 | 5.3 | 29.6 | 30.5 | 100.0 | 29.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Tincalayu (Argentina) (e) | O/P | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 100.0 | 0.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 29.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
COAL (f) | Coal | Recoverable | % Yield | Marketable reserves | Marketable coal quality | |||||||||||||||||||
type | reserves | to give | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(g) | total | marketable | Proved | Probable | Total | Total | Marketable | |||||||||||||||||
reserves | 2003 | 2002 | (h) | (h) | reserves | |||||||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | Calorific | Sulphur | millions | ||||||||||||||||
mines | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | value | content | of tonnes | ||||||||||||||||
MJ/kg | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Coal & Allied Industries | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bengalla (Australia) | O/C | SC | 204 | 81 | 104 | 62 | 166 | 185 | 28.30 | 0.50 | 30.3 | 50 | ||||||||||||
Hunter Valley Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Australia) | O/C | SC+MC | 465 | 70 | 249 | 77 | 326 | 352 | 28.90 | 0.59 | 75.7 | 247 | ||||||||||||
Mount Thorley Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Australia) | O/C | SC+MC | 42 | 64 | 27 | 27 | 30 | 28.20 | 0.53 | 60.6 | 16 | |||||||||||||
Warkworth (Australia) | O/C | SC+MC | 332 | 65 | 216 | 216 | 213 | 29.35 | 0.53 | 42.1 | 91 | |||||||||||||
Sub-total | 404 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Kaltim Prima | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sangatta (Indonesia) (i) | O/C | SC | | 383 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Kennecott Energy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Antelope (US) | O/C | SC | 260 | 100 | 260 | 260 | 297 | 20.59 | 0.23 | 100.0 | 260 | |||||||||||||
Colowyo (US) (j) | O/C | SC | 28 | 100 | 28 | 28 | 106 | 24.42 | 0.41 | 100.0 | 28 | |||||||||||||
Cordero Rojo (US) | O/C | SC | 402 | 100 | 402 | 402 | 444 | 19.59 | 0.30 | 100.0 | 402 | |||||||||||||
Decker (US) | O/C | SC | 45 | 100 | 45 | 45 | 55 | 22.11 | 0.42 | 50.0 | 23 | |||||||||||||
Jacobs Ranch (US) | O/C | SC | 531 | 100 | 531 | 531 | 581 | 20.31 | 0.47 | 100.0 | 531 | |||||||||||||
Spring Creek (US) | O/C | SC | 250 | 100 | 250 | 250 | 258 | 21.75 | 0.33 | 100.0 | 250 | |||||||||||||
Sub-total | 1,493 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Coal Australia (k) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blair Athol (Australia) | O/C | SC | 65 | 100 | 66 | 66 | 78 | 27.95 | 0.32 | 71.2 | 47 | |||||||||||||
Hail Creek (Australia) (l) | O/C | MC | 310 | 63 | 116 | 80 | 196 | 148 | 32.20 | 0.35 | 92.0 | 180 | ||||||||||||
Kestrel (Australia) | U/G | SC+MC | 153 | 80 | 47 | 76 | 123 | 127 | 32.20 | 0.65 | 80.0 | 98 | ||||||||||||
Tarong-Meandu (Australia) | O/C | SC | 146 | 69 | 93 | 7 | 100 | 115 | 21.05 | 0.30 | 100.0 | 100 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total | 425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total reserves at operating mines | 2,323 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
See notes on page 21. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 17 |
Ore reserves continued
COAL | Type of | Coal | Recoverable | %Yield | Marketable reserves | Marketable coal quality | Rio Tinto share | ||||||||||||||||||
CONTINUED (f) | mine | type | reserves | to give | |||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | (g) | total | marketable | Proved | Probable | Total | Total | Interest | Marketable | ||||||||||||||||
reserves | 2003 | 2002 | (h) | (h) | % | reserves | |||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | Calorific | Sulphur | millions | ||||||||||||||||||
of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | value | content | of tonnes | ||||||||||||||||||
Other undeveloped reserves | (m) | MJ/kg | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Coal & Allied Industries | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maules Creek (Australia) | O/C | SC+MC | 160 | 73 | 117 | 117 | 117 | 29.90 | 0.40 | 75.7 | 89 | ||||||||||||||
Mount Pleasant (Australia) (n) | O/C | SC | 459 | 76 | 306 | 44 | 350 | 285 | 26.73 | 0.51 | 75.7 | 265 | |||||||||||||
Oaklands (Australia) | O/C | SC | 400 | 100 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 20.90 | 0.25 | 75.7 | 303 | ||||||||||||||
Sub-total | 656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kaltim Prima | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bengalon (Indonesia) (i) | O/C | SC | | 169 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Coal Australia (k) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clermont (Australia) | O/C | SC | 192 | 97 | 186 | 186 | 186 | 27.90 | 0.33 | 50.1 | 93 | ||||||||||||||
SW Yarraman (Australia) | O/C | SC | 54 | 76 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 21.05 | 0.30 | 100.0 | 41 | ||||||||||||||
Tarong-Kunioon (Australia) | O/C | SC | 257 | 63 | 163 | 163 | 163 | 21.05 | 0.30 | 100.0 | 163 | ||||||||||||||
Valeria (Australia) (o) | O/C | SC | | 88 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Sub-total | 297 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total undeveloped reserves | 954 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved ore reserves | Probable ore reserves | Total ore reserves 2003 compared with 2002 | Rio Tinto share | ||||||||||||||||||||||
at end 2003 | at end 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
mill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Grade | recovery | Interest | Recoverable | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | % | % | metal | |||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | |||||||||||||||||||||
COPPER | of tonnes | %Cu | of tonnes | %Cu | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Cu | %Cu | of tonnes | ||||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
mines under construction | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alumbrera (Argentina) (p) | O/P | | 368 | | 0.51 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) (dd) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit | O/P | 28.2 | 0.56 | 529 | 0.51 | 557 | 624 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 89 | 100.0 | 2.542 | |||||||||||||
underground block cave | U/G | 321 | 0.70 | 321 | 321 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 91 | 100.0 | 2.022 | |||||||||||||||
underground skarn ores | U/G | 13.5 | 1.89 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 1.89 | 1.89 | 93 | 100.0 | 0.236 | |||||||||||||||
Escondida (Chile) (dd) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
sulphide | O/P | 644 | 1.46 | 839 | 1.02 | 1,482 | 1,545 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 86 | 30.0 | 4.615 | |||||||||||||
low grade float | O/P | 148 | 0.60 | 417 | 0.60 | 565 | 575 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 81 | 30.0 | 0.827 | |||||||||||||
oxide | O/P | 132 | 0.76 | 52.4 | 0.51 | 185 | 198 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 88 | 30.0 | 0.334 | |||||||||||||
mixed | O/P | 50.0 | 1.04 | 50.0 | 49.7 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 39 | 30.0 | 0.061 | |||||||||||||||
Escondida Norte (Chile) (q) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
sulphide | O/P | 84 | 1.84 | 417 | 1.35 | 502 | | 1.44 | | 87 | 30.0 | 1.880 | |||||||||||||
low grade float | O/P | 95 | 0.61 | 95 | | 0.61 | | 80 | 30.0 | 0.139 | |||||||||||||||
oxide | O/P | 117 | 0.77 | 117 | | 0.77 | | 85 | 30.0 | 0.229 | |||||||||||||||
Fortaleza (Brazil) (r) | U/G | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.9 | 0.25 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.21 | 0.26 | 78 | 100.0 | 0.002 | |||||||||||||
Grasberg (Indonesia) (s) | O/P+U/G | 765 | 1.13 | 1,931 | 1.07 | 2,696 | 2,584 | 1.08 | 1.12 | 88 | of which: | ||||||||||||||
FCX | 11.8 | 2.206 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint Venture | 40.0 | 6.914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Neves Corvo (Portugal) (t) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
copper ore | U/G | 17.1 | 5.32 | 0.8 | 3.59 | 17.9 | 23.5 | 5.24 | 5.10 | 86 | 49.0 | 0.396 | |||||||||||||
tin-copper ores | U/G | 1.1 | 6.81 | 0.1 | 4.48 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 6.68 | 9.11 | 81 | 49.0 | 0.031 | |||||||||||||
Northparkes (Australia) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit and stockpiles (u) | O/P | 7.3 | 0.66 | 7.3 | 9.9 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 69 | 80.0 | 0.026 | |||||||||||||||
underground | U/G | 46.7 | 1.20 | 46.7 | 48.0 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 88 | 80.0 | 0.392 | |||||||||||||||
Palabora (South Africa) (v) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit | O/P | | 3.0 | | 0.50 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
underground block cave | U/G | 210 | 0.69 | 16.0 | 0.49 | 226 | 232 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 88 | 49.2 | 0.662 | |||||||||||||
surface stockpiles | | 12 | | 0.14 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 23.514 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recoverable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
diamonds | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | carats | millions | carats | millions | millions | carats | carats | millions | |||||||||||||||||
DIAMONDS (b) | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | of tonnes | per tonne | per tonne | of carats | ||||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
and mines under construction | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Argyle (Australia) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AK1 pipe (w) | O/P+U/G | 44.8 | 2.3 | 17.5 | 2.4 | 62.3 | 42.9 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 100.0 | 146.4 | ||||||||||||||
Diavik (Canada) | O/P+U/G | 15.2 | 3.9 | 10.4 | 3.6 | 25.6 | 27.1 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 60.0 | 58.7 | ||||||||||||||
Murowa (Zimbabwe) | O/P | 23.1 | 0.7 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 78.0 | 12.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | 217.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Notes on page 21. |
18 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Type of | Proved ore reserves | Probable ore reserves | Total ore reserves 2003 compared with 2002 | Rio Tinto share | ||||||||||||||||||||
mine | at end 2003 | at end 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
mill | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Grade | recovery | Interest | Recoverable | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | % | % | metal | ||||||||||||||||||
millions | grammes | millions | grammes | millions | millions | grammes | grammes | millions | ||||||||||||||||
GOLD | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | of tonnes | per tonne | per tonne | of ounces | |||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alumbrera (Argentina) (p) | O/P | | 368 | | 0.51 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) (dd) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit | O/P | 28.2 | 0.35 | 529 | 0.33 | 557 | 624 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 66 | 100.0 | 3.834 | ||||||||||||
underground block cave | U/G | 321 | 0.27 | 321 | 321 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 68 | 100.0 | 1.856 | ||||||||||||||
underground skarn ores | U/G | 13.5 | 1.22 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 66 | 100.0 | 0.351 | ||||||||||||||
Cortez/Pipeline (US) (x) | O/P | 149 | 1.88 | 84.0 | 1.39 | 233 | 170 | 1.70 | 1.18 | 87 | 40.0 | 4.408 | ||||||||||||
Grasberg (Indonesia) (s) | O/P+U/G | 765 | 1.11 | 1,931 | 0.92 | 2,696 | 2,584 | 0.98 | 1.02 | 73 | of which: | |||||||||||||
FCX | 11.8 | 5.677 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint Venture | 40.0 | 14.252 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) (dd) | U/G | 6.8 | 3.95 | 6.8 | 6.4 | 3.95 | 4.40 | 72 | 70.3 | 0.435 | ||||||||||||||
Kelian (Indonesia) (y) | O/P | 9.9 | 1.74 | 9.9 | 15.5 | 1.74 | 2.23 | 72 | 90.0 | 0.361 | ||||||||||||||
Lihir (PNG) (y) | O/P | 36.5 | 2.86 | 127 | 4.18 | 164 | 143 | 3.88 | 3.63 | 90 | 14.5 | 2.663 | ||||||||||||
Morro do Ouro (Brazil) (dd) | O/P | 305 | 0.42 | 56.6 | 0.38 | 361 | 369 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 81 | 51.0 | 1.999 | ||||||||||||
Northparkes (Australia) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit and stockpiles (u) | O/P | 7.3 | 0.60 | 7.3 | 9.9 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 54 | 80.0 | 0.061 | ||||||||||||||
underground | U/G | 46.7 | 0.48 | 46.7 | 48.0 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 74 | 80.0 | 0.423 | ||||||||||||||
Peak (Australia) (p) | U/G | | 2.4 | | 7.26 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Rawhide (US) (z) | O/P | | 2.1 | | 0.46 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Zimbabwe | U/G | 0.2 | 6.56 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 6.56 | 6.93 | 89 | 56.0 | 0.026 | ||||||||||||||
Total | 36.347 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
product | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
IRON ORE (b) | of tonnes | %Fe | of tonnes | %Fe | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Fe | %Fe | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines and mines under construction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Channar (Australia) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brockman Ore | O/P | 115 | 63.5 | 13 | 64.7 | 127 | 130 | 63.6 | 63.6 | 60.0 | 76 | |||||||||||||
Corumbá (Brazil) | O/P | 112 | 67.2 | 106 | 67.2 | 218 | 218 | 67.2 | 67.2 | 100.0 | 218 | |||||||||||||
Eastern Range (Australia) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brockman Ore | O/P | 89 | 62.7 | 23 | 62.9 | 112 | 112 | 62.8 | 62.7 | 54.0 | 61 | |||||||||||||
Hamersley (Australia) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brockman 2 (Brockman Ore) | O/P | 23 | 62.9 | 7 | 62.8 | 30 | 35 | 62.9 | 62.9 | 100.0 | 30 | |||||||||||||
Marandoo (Marra Mamba Ore) | O/P | 84 | 62.4 | 3 | 62.6 | 86 | 96 | 62.4 | 62.4 | 100.0 | 86 | |||||||||||||
Mt Tom Price (Brockman Ore) | O/P | 131 | 64.4 | 58 | 64.6 | 189 | 199 | 64.4 | 64.5 | 100.0 | 189 | |||||||||||||
Mt Tom Price (Marra Mamba Ore) | O/P | 23 | 60.7 | 23 | 23 | 60.7 | 60.7 | 100.0 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
Paraburdoo (Brockman Ore) | O/P | 15 | 64.1 | 8 | 63.5 | 23 | 23 | 63.9 | 64.5 | 100.0 | 23 | |||||||||||||
Paraburdoo (Marra Mamba Ore) | O/P | 1 | 63.0 | 1 | 1 | 63.0 | 63.4 | 100.0 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Nammuldi (Marra Mamba Ore) | O/P | 10 | 62.0 | 0 | 61.6 | 10 | 10 | 62.0 | 62.0 | 100.0 | 10 | |||||||||||||
Yandicoogina (Pisolite Ore 1.4% Al2O3) | O/P | 219 | 58.6 | 219 | 240 | 58.6 | 58.6 | 100.0 | 219 | |||||||||||||||
Yandicoogina (Pisolite Ore 1.9% Al2O3) | 82 | 58.0 | 82 | 71 | 58.0 | 57.8 | 100.0 | 82 | ||||||||||||||||
Iron
Ore Company of Canada (Canada) |
O/P | 473 | 66.4 | 152 | 66.4 | 625 | 685 | 66.4 | 65.0 | 58.7 | 367 | |||||||||||||
Robe River (Australia) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pannawonica (Pisolite Ore) | O/P | 125 | 57.0 | 75 | 57.0 | 200 | 230 | 57.0 | 57.0 | 53.0 | 106 | |||||||||||||
West Angelas (Marra Mamba Ore) | O/P | 125 | 62.5 | 315 | 62.0 | 440 | 455 | 62.2 | 62.2 | 53.0 | 233 | |||||||||||||
Total | 1,726 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Recoverable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
metal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
LEAD | of tonnes | %Pb | of tonnes | %Pb | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Pb | %Pb | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) (dd) | U/G | 6.8 | 4.02 | 6.8 | 6.4 | 4.02 | 4.57 | 76 | 70.3 | 0.146 | ||||||||||||||
Zinkgruvan (Sweden) | U/G | 7.9 | 5.20 | 1.6 | 2.80 | 9.5 | 10.5 | 4.79 | 4.50 | 90 | 100.0 | 0.410 | ||||||||||||
Total | 0.556 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
MOLYBDENUM | of tonnes | %Mo | of tonnes | %Mo | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Mo | %Mo | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) (dd) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit | O/P | 28.2 | 0.035 | 529 | 0.037 | 557 | 624 | 0.037 | 0.033 | 55 | 100.0 | 0.114 | ||||||||||||
underground block cave | U/G | 321 | 0.035 | 321 | 321 | 0.035 | 0.035 | 48 | 100.0 | 0.054 | ||||||||||||||
Total | 0.168 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
See notes on page 21. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 19 |
Ore reserves continued
Type of | Proved ore reserves | Probable ore reserves | Total ore reserves 2003 compared with 2002 | Rio Tinto share | ||||||||||||||||||||
mine | at end 2003 | at end 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Grade | mill | ||||||||||||||||||
recovery | Interest | Recoverable | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | % | % | metal | ||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
NICKEL | of tonnes | %Ni | of tonnes | %Ni | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Ni | %Ni | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fortaleza (Brazil) (r) | U/G | 0.2 | 2.94 | 0.9 | 1.95 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 2.12 | 2.14 | 84 | 100.0 | 0.019 | ||||||||||||
millions | grammes | millions | grammes | millions | millions | grammes | grammes | millions | ||||||||||||||||
SILVER | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | of tonnes | per tonne | per tonne | of ounces | |||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) (dd) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit | O/P | 28.2 | 3.16 | 529 | 2.69 | 557 | 624 | 2.72 | 2.83 | 80 | 100.0 | 38.908 | ||||||||||||
underground block cave | U/G | 321 | 2.69 | 321 | 321 | 2.69 | 2.69 | 71 | 100.0 | 19.682 | ||||||||||||||
underground skarn ores | U/G | 13.5 | 13.4 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 13.4 | 13.4 | 71 | 100.0 | 4.114 | ||||||||||||||
Grasberg (Indonesia) (s) | O/P+U/G | 765 | 3.72 | 1,931 | 3.71 | 2,696 | 2,584 | 3.72 | 3.73 | 64 | of which: | |||||||||||||
FCX | 11.8 | 17.883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint Venture | 40.0 | 56.167 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) (dd) | U/G | 6.8 | 483 | 6.8 | 6.4 | 483 | 511 | 75 | 70.3 | 55.556 | ||||||||||||||
Neves Corvo (Portugal) (t) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
copper ore | U/G | 17.1 | 50.0 | 0.8 | 50.0 | 17.9 | 23.5 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 31 | 49.0 | 4.402 | ||||||||||||
tin-copper ore | U/G | 1.1 | 37.9 | 0.1 | 38.5 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 37.9 | 38.4 | 36 | 49.0 | 0.249 | ||||||||||||
Rawhide (US) (z) | O/P | | 2.1 | | 8.5 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Zinkgruvan (Sweden) | U/G | 7.9 | 103.0 | 1.6 | 68.0 | 9.5 | 10.5 | 97.0 | 94.1 | 74 | 100.0 | 21.923 | ||||||||||||
Total | 218.884 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
product | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
TALC (d) | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Luzenac Group (aa) | O/P+U/G | 37.0 | 21.1 | 58.1 | 81.6 | 99.9 | 58.1 | |||||||||||||||||
(Europe/North America/Australia) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recoverable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
metal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
TIN | of tonnes | %Sn | of tonnes | %Sn | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Sn | %Sn | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Neves Corvo (Portugal) (t) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
tin-copper ores | U/G | 0.3 | 3.47 | 0.02 | 1.39 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 3.36 | 4.20 | 44 | 49.0 | 0.002 | ||||||||||||
Marketable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
product | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TITANIUM DIOXIDE FEEDSTOCK (d) | millions of tonnes |
millions of tonnes |
millions of tonnes |
millions of tonnes |
millions of tonnes |
|||||||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium (bb) | O/P+D/O | 46.0 | 34.1 | 80.1 | 79.6 | 80.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Canada/South Africa) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recoverable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
metal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
URANIUM | of tonnes | %U3O8 | of tonnes | %U3O8 | of tonnes | of tonnes | %U3O8 | %U3O8 | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy Resources of Australia (Australia) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jabiluka | U/G | 6.8 | 0.57 | 7.0 | 0.45 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 94 | 68.4 | 0.045 | ||||||||||||
Ranger #3 (y) | O/P | 10.2 | 0.24 | 7.8 | 0.25 | 18.0 | 19.9 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 89 | 68.4 | 0.027 | ||||||||||||
Rössing (Namibia) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit (cc) | O/P | 3.9 | 0.052 | 21.8 | 0.038 | 25.8 | 135 | 0.040 | 0.041 | 85 | 68.6 | 0.006 | ||||||||||||
stockpiled ore | 2.6 | 0.040 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.040 | 0.041 | 85 | 68.6 | 0.001 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 0.079 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
ZINC | of tonnes | %Zn | of tonnes | %Zn | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Zn | %Zn | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||
Reserves at operating mines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) (dd) | U/G | 6.8 | 10.7 | 6.8 | 6.4 | 10.7 | 11.4 | 87 | 70.3 | 0.444 | ||||||||||||||
Zinkgruvan (Sweden) | U/G | 7.9 | 9.9 | 1.6 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 10.5 | 9.8 | 9.6 | 93 | 100.0 | 0.867 | ||||||||||||
Total | 1.310 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
See notes on page 21. |
20 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Notes | |
(a) | Type of mine: O/P = open pit, O/C = open cut, U/G = underground, D/O = dredging operation. |
(b) | Reserves of iron ore, bauxite and diamonds are shown as recoverable reserves of saleable product after accounting for all mining and processing losses. Mill recoveries are therefore not shown. Al2O3 grades are not shown for commercial reasons. |
(c) | Reserves at Weipa have increased as a result of the application of revised economic parameters permitting development of a new resource model and the subsequent transfer of resources to reserves. |
(d) | Reserves of industrial minerals are expressed in terms of marketable product, ie after all mining and processing losses. In the case of borates, the saleable product is B2O3. |
(e) | Reserves at Tincalayu have increased following development of a new geological model and a new life of mine plan. |
(f) | Coal reserves are shown as both recoverable and marketable. The yield factors shown reflect the impact of further processing, where necessary, to provide marketable coal. |
(g) | Coal type: SC = steam/thermal coal; MC = metallurgical/coking coal. |
(h) | Analyses of coal from the US were undertaken according to American Standard Testing Methods (ASTM) on an As Received moisture basis whereas the coals from Australia have been analysed on an Air Dried moisture basis according to Australian Standards (AS). MJ/kg = megajoules per kilogramme. |
(i) | Rio Tinto completed the sale of its 50 per cent interest in Kaltim Prima Coal on 10 October 2003. |
(j) | Kennecott Energy has a partnership interest in the Colowyo mine, but, as it is responsible under a management agreement for the operation of the mine, all of Colowyos reserves are included in Rio Tintos share shown above. Reserves at Colowyo have decreased following the reclassification of all material outside the current production area as measured resources. |
(k) | Rio Tinto Coal Australia was previously known as Pacific Coal. |
(l) | Production at Hail Creek commenced in July 2003; reserves are now reported in the operating mines section rather than in the other undeveloped reserves section. Reserves have increased as a result of a major strategic review and the development of a new life of mine plan. |
(m) | The term other undeveloped reserves is used here to describe material that is economically viable on the basis of technical and economic studies but for which mining and processing permits have yet to be requested or obtained. There is a reasonable, but not absolute, certainty that the necessary permits will be issued and that mining can proceed when required. |
(n) | Marketable reserves at Mount Pleasant have increased as a consequence of additional project studies which led to the development of a new resource model, and indicated higher yields as a result of improved processing methods and the planned mining of higher quality seams. |
(o) | Marketable reserves at Valeria have been reclassified as measured resources following a revision of economic parameters. |
(p) | Rio Tinto completed the sale of its 25 per cent interest in Minera Alumbrera together with its wholly owned Peak Gold Mine on 17 March 2003. |
(q) | Reserves at Escondida Norte are declared for the first time. |
(r) | Rio Tinto completed the sale of its 100 per cent interest in the Fortaleza nickel mine on 16 January 2004. |
(s) | Rio Tinto is entitled to a share in metal production from Freeports Grasberg operations due to its direct shareholding in Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold (FCX). In addition, under the terms of a joint venture agreement between Rio Tinto and FCX, Rio Tinto is entitled to a direct 40 per cent share in reserves discovered after 31 December 1994. Rio Tintos share of reserves due to these two entitlements are shown separately. |
(t) | Reserves at Neves Corvo have decreased following development of a new resource model and revised mine plan that takes into account revised cutoff grades for different mining methods and the exclusion of additional safety pillars. |
(u) | The depletion in ore reserves at Northparkes is mainly due to the reclamation of material from stockpiles. |
(v) | Open pit mining at Palabora was completed in November 2003. In addition stockpile reserves at Palabora have been reclassified as measured resources in order to meet more accurately the requirements of the JORC code. |
(w) | Reserves at Argyle have increased as a result of the development of a new resource model and revised mine plan which includes additional open pittable material and underground reserves for the first time. |
(x) | The increase in reserves at Cortez reflects the inclusion of the Cortez Hills deposit for the first time, and the transfer of material from mineral resources. |
(y) | Proved reserves at Kelian, Lihir and Ranger #3 include 9.95, 33.3 and 6.9 million tonnes respectively stockpiled at the end of December 2003 for future treatment. At Kelian, open pit mining ceased in April 2003, stockpiled ore is now being processed. At Lihir, additional drilling led to remodelling of the Kapit and Lienitz deposits; this together with a review of the life of mine plan has led to an increase in reserves. |
(z) | At Rawhide, mining operations have ceased and processing of stockpiled ore was completed in May 2003. Reclamation activities are now underway. |
(aa) | Reserves of talc have decreased as a result of a decision to close several of the North American mines. |
(bb) | Comprises reserves at QIT-Fer et Titane (Rio Tinto 100 per cent) and Richards Bay Minerals (RBM) (Rio Tinto 50 per cent). |
(cc) | At Rössing the significant reduction in reserves has resulted from a major change in the planned mining strategy which may result in mine closure when the current pit is mined out. Material outside of the current final pit has been transferred back to resources. |
(dd) | These operations have different reported reserves when SEC reporting guidelines are applied (see page 147). |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 21 |
Mineral resources
As required by the Australian Stock Exchange additional data in relation to mineral resources has been disclosed on pages 22 to 24 of the 2003 Annual report and financial statements but these pages have been intentionally omitted from the 2003 Form 20-F because they conflict with the SEC Industry Guide 7.
22-24 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 25 |
Information
on Group mines
(Rio
Tintos
interest 100 per cent unless otherwise shown)
Mine | Location | Access | Title/lease | History | Type of mine | Power source | ||||||
ALUMINIUM | ||||||||||||
Comalco | Weipa, Queensland, Australia | Road, air, and port | Queensland Government lease expires in 2041 with 21 year extension, then two years notice of termination | Bauxite mining commenced in 1961; Major upgrade completed in 1998 to incorporate Alcans adjacent Ely reserve in overall mining plan; Rio Tinto interest increased from 72.4% to 100% in 2000; Project NeWeipa announced in 2003 to lift annual capacity to 16.5 million tonnes | Open cut | On site generation | ||||||
COPPER | ||||||||||||
Escondida (30%) | Atacama Desert, Chile | Pipeline and road to deep sea port at Coloso | Rights conferred by Government under Chilean Mining Code | Production started in 1990 and expanded in phases to 2002 when new concentrator was completed | Open pit | Supplied from SING grid under two contracts with Norgener to 2008 and Nopel (Gas Atacama) to 2009 | ||||||
Grasberg (12% and 40% of joint venture) | Papua, Indonesia | Pipeline, road and port | Indonesian Government Contracts of Work expire in 2021 with two ten year extensions | Interest acquired 1995; capacity expanded to over 200,000 tonnes of ore per day in 1998 | Open pit and underground | Long term contract with US-Indonesian consortium operated purpose built coal fired generating station | ||||||
Kennecott
Minerals Cortez/Pipeline (40%) |
Nevada, US | Road | Patented and unpatented mining claims | Gold production started at Cortez in 1969. Pipeline in 1997 | Open pit | Public utility | ||||||
Kennecott
Minerals Greens Creek (70%) |
Alaska, US | Port | Patented and unpatented mining claims | Redeveloped in 1997 | Underground/drift and fill | On site diesel generators | ||||||
Kennecott
Utah Copper Bingham Canyon |
Near Salt Lake City, Utah, US | Pipeline, road and rail | Owned | Interest acquired in 1989; modernisation includes smelter complex and expanded tailings dam | Open pit | On site generation supplemented by long term contracts with Utah Power and Light | ||||||
Neves Corvo (49%) | Castro Verde, Portugal | Rail and road | Mining rights granted by Portuguese State for 90 years from 1989 | Interest acquired 1985; production started in 1989 | Underground | Supplied by EdP via grid network | ||||||
Northparkes (80%) | Goonumbla, New South Wales, Australia | Road and rail | State Government mining lease issued in 1991 for 21 years | Interest acquired in 2000; production started in 1995 | Open pit and underground | Supplied from State grid | ||||||
Palabora (49%) | Phalaborwa, Northern Province, South Africa | Rail and road | Lease from South African Government until deposits exhausted and base metal claims owned by Palabora | Development of 20 year underground mine commenced 1996 with full production timed to coincide with open pit closure in 2003 | Open pit/ underground |
Supplied by ESKOM via grid network | ||||||
Rio
Tinto Brasil Corumbá |
Matto Grosso do Sul, Brazil | Road, air and river | Government licence for undeterminedperiod | Iron ore production started 1978; interest acquired in 1991 | Open pit | Supplied by ENERSUL | ||||||
Rio
Tinto Brasil Fortaleza |
Minas Gerais, Brazil | Road | Government licence for undetermined period | Nickel matte production from underground mine | Underground open stoping | Supplied by CEMIG | ||||||
Rio
Tinto Brasil Morro do Ouro (51%) |
Minas Gerais, Brazil | Road and air | Government licence for undetermined period | Gold production started in 1987 | Open pit | Supplied by CEMIG | ||||||
Zinkgruvan | Sweden | Road | Exploration concession with Swedish Government to 2024 | Mining began in 1857 and production progressively expanded; acquired by North in 1995 prior to Rio Tinto in 2000 | Underground | Supplied by State owned power company (Valtenfall) via grid | ||||||
DIAMONDS | ||||||||||||
Diavik (60%) | Northwest Territories, Canada | Air, ice road in winter | Mining leases from Canadian federal government | Deposits discovered 19941995; construction approved 2000; diamond production started 2003 | Open pit to underground in future | On site diesel generators; installed capacity 27MW | ||||||
Argyle Diamonds | Kimberley Ranges, Western Australia | Road and air | Mining tenement held under Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement Act 198183 with right to extend for 21 years from 2004 | Studies into further development options, including underground mining, continue; interest increased from 59.7% following purchase of Ashton Mining in 2000 | Open pit | Long term contract with Ord Hydro Consortium and on site generation back up | ||||||
Rio
Tinto Zimbabwe Renco (56%) |
Zimbabwe | Road and air | Claims and mining leases | Renco redevelopment completed in 1982 | Underground/reef mining | Supplied by ZESA | ||||||
ENERGY | ||||||||||||
Coal
& Allied Industries (76%) Bengalla (30%) Hunter Valley Operations (76%) Mount Thorley (61%) Warkworth (42%) |
New South Wales, Australia | Road, rail and port | Leases granted by State | Lemington acquired late 2000 and integrated with Hunter Valley Operations. Peabody Australian interests acquired in 2001. Moura, Narama and Ravensworth interests divested in 2002 | Open cut | State owned grid | ||||||
Energy
Resources of Australia
(68%) Ranger |
Northern Territory, Australia | Road | Leases granted by State | Mining commenced 1981; interest acquired through North in 2000 | Open pit | On site diesel/steam power generation | ||||||
26 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 27 |
Information on Group mines continued
Mine | Location | Access | Title/lease | History | Type of mine | Power source | ||||||
ENERGY CONTINUED | ||||||||||||
Kennecott
Energy Antelope Colowyo (20%) Cordero Rojo Decker (50%) Jacobs Ranch Spring Creek |
Wyoming, Montana and Colorado, US | Rail and road | Leases from US and State Governments and private parties, with minimum coal production levels, and adherence to permit requirements and statutes | Antelope, Spring Creek, Decker and Cordero acquired in 1993, Colowyo in 1995, Caballo Rojo and Fort Union in 1997 and Jacobs Ranch in 1998 | Open cut | Supplied by IPPs and Cooperatives through national grid service | ||||||
Rio
Tinto Coal Australia Blair Athol (71%) Hail Creek (92%) Kestrel (80%) Tarong |
Queensland, Australia | Conveyor, road, rail and port | Leases granted by State | Production started for export at Blair Athol and adjacent power station at Tarong in 1984. Kestrel acquired and recommissioned 1999 | Open cut (Blair Athol, Hail Creek and Tarong) and underground (Kestrel) | State owned grid | ||||||
Rössing Uranium (69%) | Namib Desert, Namibia | Rail, road and port | Federal lease | Production began in 1978 | Open pit | Namibian National Power | ||||||
INDUSTRIAL MINERALS | ||||||||||||
Boron | California, US | Road, rail and port | Owned | Mine redesign project completed on budget and schedule in 2000 | Open pit | On site co-generation units | ||||||
Dampier Salt (65%) | Dampier, Lake MacLeod andPort Hedland, Western Australia | Road and port | Mining leases expiring in 2013 at Dampier, 2018 at Port Hedland and 2021 at Lake MacLeod with options to renew in each case | Construction of the Dampier field started in 1969; first shipment in 1972. Lake MacLeod was acquired in 1978 as an operating field | Solar evaporation of seawater (Dampier and Port Hedland) and underground brine (Lake MacLeod); dredging of gypsum from surface of Lake MacLeod | Dampier supply from Hamersley Iron Power; Lake MacLeod from Western Power and on site generation units; Port Hedland from Western Power | ||||||
Luzenac | Trimouns, France (other smaller operations in Australia, Europe and North America) | Road and rail | Owner of ground (orebody) and long term lease agreement to 2012 | Production started in 1885; acquired in 1988. (Australian mine acquired in 2001) | Open pit | Supplied by EdF and on site generation units | ||||||
QIT-Fer et Titane | Saguenay County, Quebec, Canada | Rail and port (St Lawrence River) | Mining covered by two Concessions granted by State in 1949 and 1951 which, subject to certain Mining Act restrictions, confer rights and obligations of an owner | Production started 1950; interest acquired in 1989 | Open pit | Long term contract with Quebec Hydro | ||||||
Richards Bay Minerals (50%) | Richards Bay, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa | Rail, road and port | Long term renewable leases; State lease for Reserve 4 initially runs to end 2022; Ingonyama Trust lease for Reserve 10 runs to 2010 | Production started 1977; interest acquired 1989; fifth dredge commissioned 2000 | Beach sand dredging | Contract with ESCOM | ||||||
IRON ORE | ||||||||||||
Hamersley
Iron Brockman Marandoo Mount Tom Price Paraburdoo Yandicoogina Channar (60%) |
Hamersley Ranges, Western Australia | Railway (owned by Hamersley Iron and operated by Pilbara Rail Company) and port (owned and operated by Hamersley Iron) | Agreements for life of mine with Government of Western Australia | Annual capacity increased to 68 million tonnes during 1990s; Yandicoogina first ore shipped in 1999 and port capacity increased | Open pits | Supplied by Hamersley Iron Power | ||||||
Iron
Ore Company of Canada (59%) (Rio Tinto also holds a 20% interestin the Labrador Iron Ore RoyaltyIncome Fund which owns 15.1%of IOC) |
Labrador City, Province ofLabrador and Newfoundland | Railway and port facilities in Sept-Iles, Quebec (owned and operated by IOC) | Sublease with the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Income Fund which has lease agreements with the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador that are due to be renewed in 2020 and 2022 | Current operation began in 1962 and has processed over 1 billion tonnes of crude ore since; annual capacity now 17.5 million tonnes of concentrate of which 12.5 million tonnes can be pelletised. Interest acquired in 2000 through North | Open pit | Supplied by Newfoundland Hydro under long term contract | ||||||
Robe
River Iron Associates (53%) Mesa J West Angelas |
Pilbara region, Western Australia | Railway (owned by Robe River Iron Associates and operated by Pilbara Rail Company) and port (owned and operated by Robe | Agreements for life of mine with Government of Western Australia | First shipment in 1972; annual sales reached 30 million tonnes in late 1990s; interest acquired in 2000 through North; West Angelas first ore shipped and port capacity increased | Open pit | Supplied by Robe River Iron Associates; West Angelas supplied by Hamersley Iron Power (commercial arrangement) | ||||||
OTHER | ||||||||||||
Kelian (90%) | Kalimantan, Indonesia | Road, river and port | Contract of Work with Indonesian Government for 30 years | Gold production started in 1992 and is scheduled to cease in 2004 | Open pit | Kelians own 29MW generating station with six identical 4.9MW rated units | ||||||
Lihir Gold (14%) | Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea | Own road, airstrip and port | Special Mining Lease with Papua New Guinea Government expires in 2035 | Production started in 1997; refinancing in 1999 and merger with Niugini Mining in 2000 | Open pit | 12 diesel unit power plant, four steam wells producing ten per cent of requirements | ||||||
28 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 29 |
Information on Group smelters, refineries and processing plants
Smelter,
refinery or plant (Rio Tinto interest 100% unless otherwise shown) |
Location | Title/lease | Plant type/product | Capacity | ||||
ALUMINIUM Comalco | ||||||||
Anglesey Aluminium (51%) | Holyhead, Anglesey, Wales | 100% Freehold | Aluminium smelter producing aluminium billet, block, sow | 145,000 tonnes per year aluminium | ||||
Bell Bay | Bell Bay, Northern Tasmania, Australia | 100% Freehold | Aluminium smelter producing aluminium ingot, block, t-bar | 167,000 tonnes per year aluminium | ||||
Boyne Smelters (59%) | Boyne Island, Queensland, Australia | 100% Freehold | Aluminium smelter producing aluminium ingot, billet, t-bar | 521,000 tonnes per year aluminium | ||||
Comalco Alumina Refinery (under construction) | Gladstone, Queensland, Australia | 97% Freehold 3% Leasehold |
Refinery: alumina production to start late 2004 | 1,400,000 tonnes per year alumina | ||||
Eurallumina (56%) | Portoscuso, Sardinia, Italy | 39% Freehold 61% Leasehold |
Refinery producing alumina | 1,020,000 tonnes per year alumina | ||||
Gladstone Power Station (42%) | Gladstone, Queensland, Australia | 100% Freehold | Thermal power station | 1,680 megawatts | ||||
New Zealand Aluminium Smelters (NZAS) (79%) | Tiwai Point, Southland, New Zealand | 19.6% Freehold 80.4% Leasehold |
Aluminium smelter producing aluminium ingot, billet, t-bar | 334,000 tonnes per year aluminium | ||||
Queensland Alumina (39%) | Gladstone, Queensland, Australia | 73.3% Freehold 26.7% Leasehold |
Refinery producing alumina | 3,731,000 tonnes per year alumina | ||||
COPPER GROUP | ||||||||
Atlantic Copper Smelter (13%) | Huelva, Spain | 100% Freehold | Flash smelting furnace/Pierce Smith convertor copper refinery | 300,000 tonnes per year refined copper | ||||
Kennecott Utah Copper | Magna, Salt Lake City, Utah, US | 100% Freehold | Flash smelting furnace/Flash convertor furnace copper refinery | 335,000 tonnes per year refined copper | ||||
Palabora (49%) | Phalaborwa, South Africa | 100% Freehold | Reverberatory Pierce Smith copper refinery | 130,000 tonnes per year refined copper | ||||
INDUSTRIAL MINERALS | ||||||||
Boron | California, US | 100% Freehold | Borates refinery | 584,000 tonnes per year boric oxide | ||||
QIT-Fer et Titane Sorel Plant | Sorel-Tracy, Quebec, Canada | 100% Freehold | Ilmenite smelter | 1,100,000 tonnes per year titanium dioxide slag, 900,000 tonnes per year iron | ||||
Richards Bay Minerals (50%) | Richards Bay, South Africa | 100% Freehold | Ilmenite smelter | 1,060,000 tonnes per year titanium dioxide slag | ||||
IRON ORE | ||||||||
Hlsmelt® (60%) | Kwinana, Western Australia | 100% Leasehold | Hlsmelt® ironmaking plant producing pig iron | 800,000 tonnes per year pig iron | ||||
IOC Pellet Plant (59%) | Labrador City, Newfoundland, Canada | 100% Subleased land | Pellet induration furnaces producing multiple iron ore pellet types | 12,500,000 tonnes per year pellet | ||||
30 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 31 |
Financial review
Financial
risk management
The Groups
policies with regard to risk management are clearly defined and consistently
applied. They are a fundamental tenet of the Groups long term strategy.
The
Groups
business is mining and not trading. The Group only sells commodities it has
produced. In the long term, natural hedges operate in a number of ways to
help protect and stabilise earnings and cash flow, obviating the need to use
derivatives or other forms of synthetic hedging for this purpose. Such hedging
is therefore undertaken to a strictly limited degree, as described below.
The
Group has a diverse portfolio of commodities and markets, which have varying
responses to the economic cycle. The relationship between commodity prices
and the currencies of most of the countries in which the Group operates provides
further natural protection. In addition, the Groups
policy of borrowing at floating US dollar interest rates helps to counteract
the effect of economic and commodity price cycles.
The
Groups
financial statements and disclosures show the full extent of its financial
commitments including debt and similar exposures. The Groups share of
the net debt of joint ventures and associates is also disclosed. It is not
the Groups practice to engineer financial structures as a way of avoiding
disclosure.
The
risk factors to which the Group is subject that are thought to be of particular
importance are summarised on page 7.
The
effectiveness of internal control procedures continues to be a high priority
in the Rio Tinto Group. A statement on this is included in Corporate governance
on pages 71 and 72.
The
Groups
policies with regard to currencies, commodities, interest rates and treasury
management are discussed below.
Adjusted
earnings
UK
Financial Reporting Standard 3 allows presentation of an adjusted measure
of earnings. As presented by Rio Tinto, this excludes the effect of exceptional
items of such magnitude that their exclusion is necessary in order that adjusted
earnings fulfil their purpose of reflecting the Groups underlying performance.
Except where otherwise indicated, earnings contributions from business units
and business segments exclude the effect of these exceptional items. Adjusted
earnings is reconciled with net earnings on page 82.
Group
operating performance
2003 compared with 2002
Adjusted
earnings of US$1,382 million were US$148 million below 2002. Including the
exceptional items described below, net earnings at US$1,508 million compared
with US$651 million reported for 2002.
The
weakening of the US dollar against the currencies in which most of the Groups
costs are denominated reduced earnings by US$412 million. The average levels
of the
Australian
dollar, Canadian dollar and South African rand were respectively 20 per cent,
11 per cent and 39 per cent stronger in 2003 than in 2002. The effect of these
and other currency movements on operating costs was to reduce earnings by
US$352 million. The effect of the shift in exchange rates on balance sheet
values expressed in the functional currencies of the relevant units further
reduced earnings and this charge was US$100 million more than the corresponding
charge in 2002. Gains on currency hedges initiated by North, Ashton and Comalco,
before they became wholly-owned subsidiaries in 2000, increased earnings by
US$40 million relative to 2002.
The
prices of many products were stronger, increasing earnings by US$442 million.
Copper prices averaged 13 per cent higher; gold 17 per cent and aluminium
seven per cent. The copper price was 51 per cent higher at the end of the
year than at the beginning and this led to a favourable effect from provisional
pricing of US$39 million. Benchmark iron ore prices increased by nine per
cent.
Over
the full year, seaborne thermal coal prices were on average seven per cent
lower and realised uranium prices were lower due to some higher priced contracts
expiring at Rössing.
Overall,
volume changes increased earnings by US$38 million. Lower gold and molybdenum
volumes at Kennecott Utah Copper, as a result of reduced by product grades,
partly offset volume growth from new mines at Diavik (diamonds) and West Angelas
(iron ore) and capacity expansions at Escondida (copper) and Hamersley (iron
ore). The benefit of higher gold grades at Grasberg, particularly in the first
half of the year, was negated by lower production following a slippage in
the mine in the fourth quarter of the year. Robust demand for diamonds enabled
Argyle to reduce inventories. Volumes of titanium dioxide feedstock were affected
by weak markets.
Turning
to costs, higher oil, power and gas prices reduced earnings by US$54 million.
Average oil prices were US$3.50 per barrel or 14 per cent higher than in 2002.
Gas prices in the US market were also higher and there were also increases
in electricity prices, principally in New Zealand.
Excluding
the effects of energy prices and the US$106 million impact of inflation, cost
increases reduced earnings by US$82 million. Two significant events adversely
affected cost performance in the period. In the first half of the year, there
was a three week smelter shut down at Kennecott Utah Copper as a result of
the acid plant failure. The slippage at the Grasberg mine in the fourth quarter
impacted both production volumes and costs.
Costs
at Coal & Allied were affected by higher demurrage caused by a shortage
of rail capacity in the Hunter Valley. Lower earnings at Rio Tinto Iron &
Titanium included
a
charge associated with the partial write down of a customer receivable.
Excluding
exceptional items, the effective tax rate at 28.8 per cent compares with 31.2
per cent for 2002. The lower charge in 2003 reflects reduced tax payments
in the US and a number of one off benefits including a credit of US$8 million
resulting from the proposed entry into the Australian tax consolidation regime,
with effect from 1 January 2003.
The
Group continues to benefit from low interest rates thanks to its policy of
having predominantly floating rate debt. The after tax net interest charge
was US$36 million less than in 2002, due both to lower interest paid and higher
capitalised interest. The net central cost of the Groups
pension schemes was about US$60 million higher than in 2002.
The
sale of the Fortaleza nickel mine was completed on 16 January 2004 and the
profit on sale will, therefore, be taken up in 2004. However, the net earnings
of Rio Tinto Brasil include a credit of US$32 million resulting from the reversal
of part of an impairment provision relating to Fortaleza recorded in a previous
year.
The
2003 exceptional items of US$126 million relate to gains on the disposal of
Kaltim Prima Coal, Peak and Alumbrera. No tax was payable on these gains.
2002
compared with 2001
Adjusted
earnings of US$1,530 million for 2002 were US$132 million below 2001. After
the exceptional charges described below, net earnings at US$651 million compared
with US$1,079 million reported for 2001.
Changes
in selling prices and exchange rates reduced earnings by US$74 million. Average
gold prices were 14 per cent higher than in 2001, but aluminium prices averaged
eight per cent lower. Average copper prices were slightly down but there
was
a benefit from provisionally priced copper. Benchmark prices for iron ore
and seaborne thermal coal fell. North American domestic coal prices improved
with market fundamentals, as the effects of the California energy crisis
in
early 2001 flowed into contract prices. The negative variance due to exchange
rate movements was principally a result of the Australian dollar being stronger
relative to the US dollar.
Higher
volumes increased earnings by US$85 million. Demand for iron ore was extremely
strong with Hamersley Iron achieving record production and shipments from
the West Angelas mine beginning to ramp up. Diamond sales volumes were also
higher than in 2001. There were lower gold volumes from the Groups
interest in Grasberg as a result of lower grades, particularly in the first
half of the year.
Excluding
the effect of inflation, changes in costs benefited earnings by US$54 million.
However, cost inflation more than offset this benefit, reducing earnings
by
US$76 million.
The
interest charge on the Groups
debt in 2002 was US$72 million lower than in 2001 although the level of debt
did not
32 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
change
significantly.
Other
variances reduced earnings by US$193 million compared with 2001. Of this,
US$54 million resulted from the gain that was included in 2001 earnings as
a result of the disposal of Norzink. There were also adverse variances on
other corporate items, including pension costs. Earnings in 2002 suffered
from the reduced value of pension fund assets associated with falling stock
markets and from a reduction in the expected return on pension fund equity
investments compared with that applied in previous years.
Excluding
exceptional items, the effective tax rate at 31.2 per cent was broadly in
line with the previous year.
Exceptional
charges in 2002 of US$879 million, net of tax and outside shareholder interests,
comprised provisions for the write down of asset carrying values of US$763
million and a charge relating to environmental remediation works at Kennecott
Utah Copper (KUC) of US$116 million. US$480 million of the asset write downs
related to KUC and US$235 million related to the Iron Ore Company of Canada.
The
increase in the expected cost of environmental remediation resulted from a
significant change in the planned methodology for treatment of contaminated
groundwater in the vicinity of the Bingham Canyon mine. The 2001 exceptional
charge comprised provisions for the write down of asset carrying values.
Cash
flow
2003
compared with 2002
The
Groups operating cash flow remained strong. Total cash flow from operations
of US$3,486 million, including dividends from associates and joint ventures,
was only seven per cent below 2002 despite ten per cent lower adjusted earnings.
Tax
paid includes an amount of US$106 million relating to the disputed tax assessments
from the Australian Tax Office described in note 29 of the financial statements.
The amount paid has been recorded as a receivable in these accounts because
the directors believe that the relevant tax assessments are not sustainable.
Investment
in the business continued at a high level. Capital expenditure and financial
investment of US$1,673 million was US$197 million less than 2002. Purchases
of plant and equipment included the expansion of iron ore capacity and the
construction of the Comalco Alumina Refinery. Purchases less sales of investments
in 2002 of US$323 million mainly related to US Treasury bonds held as security
for the deferred consideration on the North Jacobs Ranch acquisition, of which
US$76 million were sold in 2003.
Rio
Tinto continues to explore opportunities to dispose of non core assets but
only when such disposals are value creating. The sale of assets, principally
Peak, Alumbrera and Kaltim Prima Coal generated a cash inflow of US$405 million.
2002
compared with 2001
Cash
from operating activities together with dividends from joint ventures and
associates totalled US$3,743 million in 2002, an increase of ten per cent
compared with 2001. Tight control of working capital was reflected in reductions
in accounts receivable and inventories totalling US$243 million, which largely
reversed increases reported in 2001.
Net
investment in property, plant and equipment of US$1,417 million was at a similar
level to that in 2001. The major areas of expansionary investment in 2002
were the Diavik diamond mine, the West Angelas iron ore mine, the Hail Creek
coking coal development, Comalcos
alumina refinery and the first instalment on the purchase of additional coal
reserves at North Jacobs Ranch.
Disposals
of businesses net of acquisitions generated US$127 million. This largely related
to units acquired with Peabodys
Australian coal business in 2001, which the Group sold on as planned.
Purchases
of other investments absorbed a further US$323 million of cash. These investments
included US$304 million of US Treasury bonds held as security for the deferred
consideration on the North Jacobs Ranch reserves acquired during the period,
which is payable over the next four years. Dividends paid were US$145 million
higher than 2001 as a result of the change in policy for weighting of interim
and final dividends announced in 2001.
Balance
sheet
Shareholders
funds increased by US$2,575
million to US$10,037 million mainly due to profits exceeding dividends by
US$626 million and due to exchange rate movements of US$1,924 million. The
most significant of these was the strengthening of the Australian dollar by
32 per cent against the US dollar. Net debt reduced by US$101 million to US$5,646
million. The ratio of net debt to total capital improved from 41 per cent,
at 31 December 2002, to 34 per cent at 31 December 2003. Interest was covered
11 times.
As
detailed in note 18 to the Financial statements, US$2,194 million (36 per
cent) of the Groups
borrowings at the end of 2003 will mature in 2004. Of this, US$1,687 million
was commercial paper, mainly raised through markets in the US. Although US$1,100
million of this is backed by bank standby facilities expiring after one year,
it is regarded as short term debt under UK accounting rules. Under Australian
and US accounting practices, commercial paper backed in this way would be
grouped with non current borrowings, and the Group regards it as such in managing
the maturity profile of its debt.
At
the year end, medium and long term borrowings (excluding the above commercial
paper), totalled US$3,849 million. The amount issued under the US$3 billion
European Medium Term Notes Programme was US$1,618 million of which US$70 million
is repayable within one year. In addition to the above, the Groups share of the third party net debt of joint ventures and associates totalled US$1,004 million at 31 December 2003, as detailed in note 14 to the Financial statements. Save for US$6 million, this debt is without recourse to Rio Tinto.
Liquidity
and capital resources
Rio
Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited continue to enjoy the strong long and short
term credit ratings from Moodys and Standard and Poors shown below.
Long Term | Short Term | Outlook | |
Standard & Poors | A+ | A-1 | Stable |
Moodys | Aa3 | P-1 | Negative |
The
unified credit status of the Group is maintained through cross guarantees
whereby contractual obligations of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited are
automatically guaranteed by the other. These ratings continue to provide financial
flexibility and consistent access to debt via money or capital markets and
enable very competitive terms to be obtained.
The
Group has access to the following markets for its financing requirements:
• | US and Canadian commercial paper markets |
• | European Medium Term Note (EMTN) private placement |
• | US, euro and sterling bond markets. |
During
2003, the Group raised US$462 million in maturities of one to five years via
its EMTN programme. In June 2003, the Group issued a US$600 million Global
bond. Proceeds of these issues were employed to repay maturing term debt and
commercial paper.
The
Groups
commercial paper programmes are fully backed by bank standby facilities which
totalled US$2.75 billion at 31 December 2003, of which US$1.1 billion was
on terms exceeding one year. These facilities can be drawn upon at any time
in the unlikely event of disruption in the commercial paper market. These
standby facilities are provided by strongly rated banking counterparties.
As
at 31 December 2003, the Group had contractual obligations other than short
term debt in the form of commercial paper and bank borrowings repayable on
demand arising in the ordinary course of business as follows:
Total | Less | Between | Between | After 5 | ||||||
than 1 | 1 and 3 | 3 and 5 | years | |||||||
US$m | year | years | years | |||||||
Contractual cash | ||||||||||
obligations | ||||||||||
Debt (a) | 4,208 | 359 | 1,638 | 1,764 | 447 | |||||
Operating leases | 131 | 38 | 34 | 12 | 47 | |||||
Unconditional purchase | ||||||||||
obligations | 3,010 | 268 | 553 | 477 | 1,712 | |||||
Other (b) | 679 | 665 | 14 | | | |||||
Total | 8,028 | 1,330 | 2,239 | 2,253 | 2,206 | |||||
(a)
Debt obligations exclude commercial paper and bank borrowings repayable on
demand
(b) Other relates to long term obligations including capital commitments
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 33 |
Financial review continued
On
the basis of the levels of obligations described above, the unused capacity
under the Groups commercial paper programmes, the Groups anticipated
ability to access debt and equity capital markets in the future and the level
of anticipated internal cash generation, the directors believe that the Group
has sufficient short and long term sources of funding available to meet its
liquidity requirements.
The
Groups
committed bank standby facilities contain a financial undertaking that the Groups
consolidated income before interest and taxes for any annual accounting period
shall not be less than three times consolidated interest payable for such period.
The ratio for 2003 is well above this minimum. The Group does not have any financial
agreements that would be affected to any material extent by a reduction in the
Groups credit rating.
The
Groups
policy is to centralise and minimise surplus cash balances whenever possible.
The majority of cash balances are held in jurisdictions without exchange controls.
Exchange
rates, reporting currencies and currency exposure
Rio
Tintos assets, earnings and cash flows are influenced by a wide variety
of currencies due to the geographic diversity of the Groups sales and
the countries in which it operates. The US dollar, however, is the currency
in which the great majority of the Groups sales are denominated. Operating
costs are influenced by the currencies of those countries where the Groups
mines and processing plants are located and also by those currencies in which
the costs of imported equipment and services are determined. The Australian
and US dollars are the most important currencies influencing costs.
In
any particular year, currency fluctuations may have a significant impact on
Rio Tintos
financial results. A weakening of the US dollar against the currencies in which
the Groups costs are determined has an adverse effect on Rio Tintos
net earnings. The approximate effects on the Groups net earnings of ten
per cent movements from the 2003 full year average exchange rates of the currencies
having most impact on costs are as follows:
Average | Effect of | ||
exchange rate | 10% change | ||
for 2003 | in full year | ||
in US cents | average US$m | ||
Australian $ | 65 | 141± | |
Canadian $ | 71 | 26± | |
Rand | 13 | 22± | |
These sensitivities are based on 2003 prices, costs and volumes and assume that all other variables remain constant. They take into account the effect of hedges maturing in 2004, as disclosed in note 28 to the Financial statements. These exchange rate sensitivities include the effect on operating costs of movements in exchange rates but exclude
the
impact through revaluation of foreign currency working capital. They should
therefore be used with care.
In
the case of the Australian dollar, there is a significant degree of natural
protection against cyclical fluctuations, in that the currency tends to be
weak, reducing costs in US dollar terms, when commodity prices are low, and
vice versa.
Given
the dominant role of the US currency in the Groups
affairs, the US dollar is the currency in which financial performance is measured
and in which financial results are presented both internally and externally.
It is also the natural currency for borrowing and holding surplus cash. Modest
amounts of cash are held in other currencies for short term operational reasons.
The
Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars, either directly or
using currency swaps, and a significant proportion of the Groups
US dollar debt is located in subsidiaries having functional currencies other
than the US dollar. Exchange gains and losses relating to US dollar debt impact
on the profit and loss accounts of such subsidiaries. However, such exchange
gains and losses are excluded from the Groups profit and loss account
on consolidation with a corresponding adjustment directly to reserves. This
means that financing in US dollars impacts in a consistent manner on the Groups
consolidated accounts irrespective of the functional currency of the particular
subsidiary where the debt is located.
Under
US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the above exchange differences
must be charged against the profit for the year except to the extent that
the US dollar debt is effective as a hedge of assets accounted for in US dollars
in the particular companies in which the debt resides. This gives rise to
an adjustment in the US GAAP reconciliation for 2003, increasing US GAAP earnings
by US$623 million net of tax and outside shareholders
interests; but no adjustment to US GAAP shareholders funds is required.
The
Group does not generally believe that active currency hedging would provide
long term benefits to shareholders. Currency protection measures may be deemed
appropriate in specific commercial circumstances and are subject to strict
limits laid down by the Rio Tinto board. As set out in note 28 to the Financial
statements, as at 31 December 2003 there were forward contracts, including
synthetic forwards, to purchase A$1,459 million, C$18 million and NZ$875 million
in respect of future trading transactions. From the Groups
perspective, these forward contracts offset the impact of exchange rate variations
on a portion of the local currency costs incurred by various subsidiaries.
Much of the above hedge book was acquired with North Limited. North held a
substantial hedge book on acquisition, which has been retained but is not
being renewed as maturities occur.
The
Group has also entered into forward
currency contracts in respect of certain capital commitments. As at 31 December 2003, it held contracts to purchase A$393 million in respect of future committed capital expenditure.
Interest
rates
Rio
Tintos interest rate management policy is generally to borrow and invest
cash at floating rates. Short term US dollar rates are normally lower than long
term rates, resulting in lower interest costs to the Group.
Furthermore,
cyclical movements of interest rates tend to compensate, to an extent, for those
of commodity prices. In some circumstances, an element of fixed rate funding
may be considered appropriate. At the end of 2003, only 13 per cent of the Groups
net debt was fixed rate. Based on the Groups net debt at 31 December 2003,
and with other variables unchanged, the approximate effect on the Groups
net earnings of a one percentage point increase in US dollar LIBOR interest
rates would be a reduction of US$30 million.
Commodity
prices
The
Groups normal policy is to sell its products at prevailing market prices.
Exceptions to this rule are subject to strict limits laid down by the Rio Tinto
board and to rigid internal controls. Rio Tintos exposure to commodity
prices is diversified by virtue of its broad commodity spread and the Group
does not generally believe commodity price hedging would provide long term benefit
to shareholders.
Metals
such as copper and aluminium are generally sold under contract, often long term,
at prices determined by reference to prevailing market prices on terminal markets,
such as the London Metal Exchange and COMEX in New York, usually at the time
of delivery. Prices fluctuate widely in response to changing levels of supply
and demand but, in the long run, prices are related to the marginal cost of
supply. Gold is also priced in an active market in which prices respond to daily
changes in quantities offered and sought. Newly mined gold is only one source
of supply; investment and disinvestment can be important elements of supply
and demand. Contract prices for many other natural resource products are generally
agreed annually or for longer periods with customers, although volume commitments
vary by product.
Approximately
40 per cent of Rio Tintos
2003 net earnings from operating businesses came from products whose prices
were terminal market related and the remainder came from products priced by
direct negotiation.
The
approximate effect on the Groups
net earnings of a ten per cent change from the full year average market price
in 2003 for the following metals would be:
34 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Average | Effect of 10% | ||
market price | change in full | ||
for 2003 | year average | ||
US$m | |||
Copper | 80 c/lb | 109 ± | |
Aluminium | 65 c/lb | 95 ± | |
Gold | US$363/oz | 52 ± | |
The above sensitivities are based on 2003 volumes and give the estimated impact on net earnings of changes in prices, assuming that all other variables remain constant. The relationships between currencies and commodity prices is a complex one and movements in exchange rates can cause movements in commodity prices and vice versa. The sensitivities allow for the effect of the commodity hedges maturing in 2004, as disclosed in note 28 to the Financial statements.
Treasury management and financial instruments
Treasury
activities operate as a service to the business of the Rio Tinto Group and not
as a profit
centre. Strict limits on the size and type of transaction permitted are laid
down by the Rio Tinto board and are subject to rigorous internal controls.
Corporate funding and overall strategic management of Rio Tintos balance
sheet is handled by the London based Group Treasury.
Rio
Tinto does not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading
or speculative purposes; and does not believe that it has exposure to such trading
or speculative holdings through its investments in joint ventures and associates.
Derivatives are used to separate funding and cash management decisions from currency
exposure and interest rate management. The Group uses interest rate swaps in
conjunction with longer term funds raised in the capital markets to achieve a
floating rate obligation which is consistent with the Groups interest rate
policy. Currency swaps are used to convert debt or investments into currencies,
primarily the US dollar, which are consistent with the Groups policy on
currency exposure management. No material exposure is considered to exist by
virtue of the possible non performance of the counterparties to financial instruments
held by the Group.
The derivative contracts in which the Group is involved are valued for the purposes of the Financial instrument disclosures in the Financial statements by reference to quoted market prices, quotations from independent financial institutions or by discounting expected cash flows.
Dividends
Dividends paid on Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares are equalised on a net cash basis; that is without taking into account any associated tax credits. Dividends are determined in US dollars.
Rio
Tintos progressive dividend policy aims to increase the US dollar value
of dividends over time, without cutting them in
economic downturns. Rio Tinto plc shareholders receive dividends in pounds sterling and Rio Tinto Limited shareholders receive dividends in Australian dollars, which are determined by reference to the exchange rates applicable to the US dollar two days prior to the announcement of dividends. Changes in exchange rates could result in a reduced sterling or Australian dollar dividend in a year in which the US dollar value is maintained or increased. For 2002 and subsequently, the policy is that the interim dividend for each year in US dollar terms will be equivalent to 50 per cent of the previous years total US dollar dividends.
Critical
accounting
policies & estimates
Dual listed company reporting
As
explained in detail, in the Outline of dual listed companies structure and basis
of financial statements, the consolidated financial statements of the
Rio Tinto Group deal with the results and assets and liabilities of both of
the dual listed companies, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited and their subsidiaries.
They are prepared under UK GAAP and satisfy the obligations of Rio Tinto Limited,
as laid down by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. This
annual report also includes reconciliation statements setting out the effect
of the adjustments to net earnings and to shareholders funds for the
Group that would be required, under Australian and under US GAAP. The US dollar
is the presentation currency used in these financial statements, as it most
reliably reflects the Groups global business performance.
The treatment of gains and losses on US dollar debt is described above in the section dealing with Exchange rates, reporting currencies and currency exposure.
Ore reserve estimates
Rio Tinto estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources based on information compiled by Competent Persons as defined in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves of September 1999 (the JORC code). There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating ore reserves; and assumptions that are valid at the time of estimation may change significantly when new information becomes available.
Changes in the forecast prices of commodities, exchange rates, production costs or recovery rates may change the economic status of reserves and may, ultimately, result in the reserves being restated. Such changes in reserves could impact on depreciation rates, asset carrying values and provisions for close down, restoration and environmental costs.
The
SEC has indicated that, for US reporting, historical price data should be used
as a basis for ore reserve estimation. The application of such historical prices
has led to reduced ore reserve quantities for US reporting purposes for certain
of the Groups
operations. This increased the present value of the provision for close down costs, which increased the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded on implementation of FAS 143 in the US GAAP reconciliation for 2003. It also reduced US GAAP earnings for 2003 by a further US$82 million, largely as a result of higher depreciation charges.
Asset carrying values
Exceptional
charges of US$583m in 2001 and US$879m in 2002, net of tax and minority interests,
related largely to impairment of the balance sheet carrying values of certain
of the Groups businesses. No significant impairment charges occurred
in 2003 but it will be necessary to keep under review in each future accounting
period whether events or changes in circumstances may necessitate further adjustments
to asset carrying values.
The
carrying values are assessed by reference to the net present values of forecast
future cash flows. The cash flows are particularly sensitive to the long term
values of two particular parameters: exchange rates and commodity selling prices.
Management considers that over time there is a tendency for increases in prices
to compensate to some extent for a reduction in the value of the US dollar (and
vice versa). But such compensating changes are not synchronised and do not fully
offset each other. The great majority of the Groups sales are based on
prices denominated in US dollars. To the extent that the US dollar weakens without
commodity price offset, cash flows and therefore net present values are reduced.
During 2003, the US dollar weakened by 32 per cent against the Australian dollar, by 22 per cent against the Canadian dollar, and 30 per cent against the South African rand. Towards the end of 2003, there were substantial increases in commodity prices, which have continued to rise in early 2004.
Rio
Tintos cash flow forecasts are based on assessments of expected long term
commodity prices derived from analysis of supply and demand for particular products.
These assessments often differ from current price levels and are updated periodically.
For the majority of Rio Tintos businesses, by both number and by value,
the net present value of the expected cash flows, using the most recent assessments,
is substantially in excess of the carrying value in the balance sheet. For a
minority of the businesses the carrying value is close to the net present value
of the cash flows, using the most recent assessments. The effects of exchange
rates and commodity price changes on the values of these units relative to their
book values are monitored closely.
Environmental obligations
Provision is made for environmental remediation costs when the related environmental disturbance occurs, based on the net present value of estimated future
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 35 |
Financial review continued
costs. Where the ultimate cost of environmental disturbance is uncertain, there may be variances from these cost estimates, which could affect future financial results.
Close down and restoration costs are a normal consequence of mining, and the majority of close down and restoration expenditure is incurred at the end of the life of the mine. Although the ultimate cost to be incurred is uncertain, subsidiary companies have estimated their respective costs based on feasibility and engineering studies using current restoration standards and techniques.
Post retirements benefits
Post
retirement benefits are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Standard
Accounting
Practice 24, which requires gradual recognition of the surpluses and deficits
that emerge as a result of variances from actuarial assumptions. The Accounting
Standards Board has extended the transitional period before FRS 17 is required
to be implemented. Under FRS 17, all deficits would be recognised in full
and surpluses would be recognised to the extent that they are considered
recoverable.
FRS 17 transitional disclosures are included on pages 125 to 128. If FRS
17 had been applied in drawing up the 2003 financial statements, shareholders funds
would have been US$650 million lower, including the impact of the level of
stock markets at 31 December 2003, and net earnings would have been US$17
million higher.
Overburden removal costs
In open pit mining operations, it is necessary to remove overburden and other waste materials to access ore from which minerals can economically be extracted. The process of mining overburden and waste materials is referred to as stripping. During the development of a mine, before production commences, it is generally accepted that stripping costs are capitalised as part of the investment in construction of the mine.
Stripping of waste materials continues during the production stage of the mine. Some mining companies expense these production stage stripping costs as incurred, while others defer such stripping costs. Those mining companies that expense stripping costs as incurred will report greater volatility in the results of their operations from period to period.
Rio Tinto defers stripping costs for those operations where this is the most appropriate basis for matching costs with the related economic benefits, and the effect is material.
The
relationship between the stripping ratio in the period and that
planned for the life of the particular mine is important in determining the
amount, if
any, of stripping costs that are deferred. The stripping ratio is generally
calculated by dividing the tonnage of waste mined by the tonnage of ore mined
during the
relevant period. In these cases, deferral of stripping costs is not impacted
by the reported ore grade. The costs to be
deferred (or accrued) are those relating to the excess (or shortfall) of the current period stripping ratio compared with that projected for the life of the mine. The life of mine stripping ratio is based on the proven and probable reserves of the operation.
In operations that experience material fluctuations in the stripping ratio on a year by year basis over the life of the mine, deferral of stripping costs is designed to smooth the cost of stripping allocated to individual reporting periods, generally in relation to the tonnage of ore mined. Stripping costs incurred in the period are deferred to the extent that the stripping ratio exceeds the life of mine stripping ratio. Such deferred costs are then charged against reported profits to the extent that, in subsequent periods, the stripping ratio falls short of the life of mine stripping ratio.
In some operations, there are distinct periods of new development during the production stage of the mine. These may, for example, relate to a separate ore body or discrete section of the ore body. The new development will be characterised by a major departure from the life of mine stripping ratio. Excess stripping costs during such periods are deferred and subsequently amortised pro rata, generally to the tonnage of ore mined in the remaining life of the operation.
Deferred stripping costs form part of the total investment in the relevant income generating unit, which is reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
During 2003, production stage stripping costs incurred by subsidiaries and equity accounted operations exceeded the amounts charged against pre tax profit by US$109 million. The net book value carried forward in property, plant and equipment and in investments in joint ventures and associated companies at 31 December 2003 was US$671 million.
Amortisation
of deferred stripping costs is included in depreciation of property, plant
and equipment or in the Groups share of the results of its equity accounted
operations, as appropriate.
Contingencies
Disclosure is
made of material contingent liabilities unless the possibility of any loss
arising
is considered remote. Disclosure of material contingent assets is made where
the inflow of economic benefits is probable. Contingencies are disclosed
in note 29 on page 117. These include tax assessments of approximately A$500
million,
which, based on Counsels opinion, the Group expects to be successful
in challenging.
International
financial reporting standards
To satisfy its reporting obligations in the UK and in Australia, the Group will be drawing up its financial statements for 2005 and subsequent years in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards.
Comparative figures
In the Operational review section, comparative figures have been restated to reflect the composition of each product group in 2003, as well as a change in the basis of attribution of post retirement costs to business units. These changes are explained in more detail on pages 132 and 133.
Forward looking statements
Forward looking statements are contained in this financial review and attention is drawn to the Cautionary statement on pages 7 and 8.
36 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Operational review
Iron Ore group
Iron Ore | Iron Ore |
(Rio Tinto share) | (Rio Tinto share) |
million tonnes | million tonnes |
MINED | RESERVES |
Iron Ore
Earnings
contribution
US$m
Rio Tintos
Iron Ore group wholly owns Hamersley Iron in Western Australia. Hamersley Iron
wholly owns five mines and also operates the 60 per cent owned Channar mine,
a joint venture with an Australian subsidiary of the China Iron & Steel Industry & Trade
Group Corporation.
The
Iron Ore group also includes Rio Tintos effective 53 per cent interest
in Robe River Iron Associates two mines in Western Australia and Rio Tintos
59 per cent interest in the Iron Ore Company of Canada. The Iron Ore group operates
both enterprises, which were acquired in 2000.
In addition, the Iron Ore group includes the HIsmelt® direct smelting technology developed in Western Australia.
At
31 December 2003, the group accounted for 25 per cent of Rio Tintos operating
assets, an increase of four per cent over the year. In 2003, the group contributed
approximately 18 per cent of the Groups turnover and 36 per cent of adjusted
earnings, up two and six per cent respectively on 2002. Adjusted earnings are
explained on page 32.
Late in the year, Rio Tinto reached agreement with its joint venture partners in Robe River to allow closer cooperation between the Pilbara operations of Hamersley Iron and Robe.
Under
the agreement, the two companies existing separate structures will continue,
with no change to the ownership of Robe or Hamersley Iron or to the ownership
of their respective assets. While preserving these structural elements, the agreement
allows for continued cooperation and common usage of rail infrastructure; for
closer cooperation and common usage of infrastructure areas such as port and
power; and for closer cooperation in relation to the management of non infrastructure
assets, including mobile and other mining equipment and site and corporate services.
New entities will be formed to facilitate the implementation of the agreement. The entities will collectively be referred to as Pilbara Iron.
Rio Tinto and the Robe River Joint Venture participants are working towards final documentation of the agreement, and implementation will be subject to obtaining any necessary Government approvals.
In January 2004, Hamersley Iron announced iron ore price settlements that increased prices by 18.62 per cent for the contract commencing 1 April 2004.
Chris Renwick, chief executive Iron Ore, is based in Perth, Western Australia.
FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
2003
compared with 2002
The
Iron Ore groups contribution to 2003 earnings was US$499 million,
US$47 million higher than in 2002.
Demand
for iron ore continued to be extremely strong throughout 2003, particularly
from China, where imports of iron ore were
30 per cent higher than 2002. Strong demand for iron and steel in China bolstered demand for iron ore in other markets, with Japan, Korea and Taiwan all at record levels.
Price increases reflected the strong market, with a nine per cent increase for 2003 achieved in May.
In
September Hamersley became aware that China Iron & Steel Industry Trade Group
Corporation had entered into a conditional heads of agreement with Lynas Corporation
Ltd to dispose of its 40 per cent interest in the Channar Joint Venture in return
for cash and shares in Lynas under a transaction which remains incomplete. Hamersley
subsequently issued proceedings in the Western Australia Supreme Court to protect
confidential joint venture information. Those proceedings are continuing.
2002 compared with 2001
The
Iron Ore groups
contribution to 2002 earnings was US$452 million, US$50 million lower than
in 2001.
After a relatively slow start, and with considerable uncertainty surrounding the future outlook, the performance of the world iron and steel industry improved markedly throughout 2002.
Reflecting the early uncertainty, global iron ore prices declined in 2002 by 2.4 per cent for fines, 5.0 per cent for lump and 5.5 per cent for pellets. However, as demand grew through the year, especially from China, shipments increased quarter by quarter, leading to some delays in loading vessels and consequent demurrage costs towards the end of the year.
An exceptional charge of US$235 million relating to the impairment of asset carrying values at IOC was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2002.
Hamersley Iron (Rio
Tinto: 100 per cent)
Hamersley Irons six mines in Western Australia, 630
kilometre dedicated railway, and port and infrastructure facilities at Dampier
are run as one operation. Hamersley Iron employs approximately 2,100 people.
In 2003, Hamersley Iron completed option analysis studies to increase its system capacity to ensure its ability to meet the needs of customers and the strong growth in demand for iron ore, particularly in China.
As a consequence, in December, Rio Tinto approved projects to expand the Dampier port and the Yandicoogina mine worth a total of US$920 million, with US$200 million of this committed to long lead time capital items.
The
port expansion will increase Dampiers export capacity from 74 million tonnes
per annum to 116 million tonnes per annum. The Yandicoogina mine expansion will
increase output to 36 million tonnes per annum from the 24 million tonne per
annum capacity it will achieve in 2004.
Construction on both projects began in December 2003. Commissioning of the
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 37 |
Operational review continued
36 million tonne Yandicoogina mine expansion is expected in early 2005. Completion of the port expansion is scheduled for late 2005, with progressive commissioning from early 2006.
Studies are continuing into providing additional rail, power and other infrastructure to complement the new port and mine requirements. Studies into further new mine capacity to meet future growth in demand are also being advanced.
Construction of the US$64 million
Eastern Range mine continued on target for a production start in early 2004. Located ten kilometres east of Paraburdoo, the mine will service an unincorporated joint venture between Hamersley Iron and Shanghai Baosteel Group Corporation, Chinas
largest iron and steel maker. The joint venture, in which Hamersley Iron holds
a 54 per cent equity share, will supply about ten million tonnes of standard
Hamersley Iron ore products per year over 20 years.
2003 operating performance
Hamersley Irons
total production in 2003 was a record 73.4 million tonnes, 5.2 million tonnes
more than in 2002. Rio Tintos share of this production was 69.3 million
tonnes.
Shipments by Hamersley Iron totalled a record 74.3 million tonnes, including sales through joint ventures. Hamersley Irons
shipments to China also reached a record level at 33.9 million tonnes, making
China by far the single largest destination for Hamersley Iron ore.
Production from all mines was stretched to achieve these levels, placing cost and other operating stresses on the Hamersley Iron system. Maintenance programmes were maintained to ensure continued ability to service growing market demand, including the first changeout of the Channar mines
20 kilometre conveyor belt since the mine began production in 1990.
The Brockman mine reopened in February 2003, following a major refit to lift capacity to approximately eight million tonnes per year, allowing it to service the adjacent Nammuldi mine.
The Pilbara Rail Company, formed in 2002, which effectively integrates the rail networks of Hamersley Iron and Robe River into a single operation, continued to deliver operating savings through rolling stock, track maintenance and operational efficiencies. Further new track was built in 2003 to duplicate a 50 kilometre section of the main line, and additional locomotives and ore cars were commissioned to enhance the overall system capacity.
In the spirit of closer cooperation with Robe, Hamersley Iron for the first time shipped product from its Yandicoogina mine through Robes
Cape Lambert port facilities in October, increasing operational flexibility
and helping to relieve congestion at Dampier.
The US$55 million structured cost saving programme begun in 2001 was completed in 2003, but was offset by higher costs incurred
to stretch output. Key sustainable savings achieved included: ongoing operational improvements including benefits realised from Pilbara Rail; continued improvement in labour productivity, including benefits flowing from the consolidation of information technology and accounting resources into a shared services group for Rio Tinto in Western Australia; and savings accrued from a large number of targeted projects including rescheduling of operations, procurement benefits and capital investment. Additional costs arose from the need to ensure competitive remuneration in the Pilbara.
Hamersley Iron continued to work sustainable development principles into its daily operations throughout the year, using a modified version of its decision making methodology to enhance stakeholder engagement in the port and Yandicoogina expansion projects. In November 2003, Hamersley Iron also achieved certification under ISO 14001 for its environmental management system.
Ore reserves changed in line with delineation drilling to improve confidence, annual extraction and updated mine planning. Ore reserves are now expressed by material type to clarify their likely use.
Hamersley Irons total sales of iron ore to major markets in 2003
Million tonnes | |
China | 33.9 |
Japan | 19.0 |
Other Asia | 16.0 |
Europe | 5.4 |
Total | 74.3 |
Note: This table includes 100 per cent of all sales through joint ventures. |
Robe
River Iron Associates (Rio
Tinto: 53 per cent)
Robe River Iron Associates (Robe) is an unincorporated joint
venture in which Mitsui (33 per cent), Nippon Steel (10.5 per cent) and Sumitomo
Metal Industries (3.5 per cent) also have interests. Robe is the worlds
fourth largest seaborne trader in iron ore, employing approximately 735 people.
The company operates two open pit mining operations in Western Australia. Mesa J is located in the Robe Valley, north of the town of Pannawonica. The mine produces Robe River fines and lump, which are pisolitic iron ore products. The West Angelas mine, opened in 2002, is located approximately 100 kilometres west of the town of Newman. The mine produces West Angelas fines and lump, which are Marra Mamba iron ore products.
The mine schedule for West Angelas production capacity is being accelerated. Mine production reached an annualised rate of 18 million tonnes per year in December 2003, and West Angelas is on schedule to reach its original design rate of 20 million tonnes per year by the end of the first quarter of 2004, two years earlier than planned. This
will
increase Robes production capacity to a nominal 50 million tonnes per
year. In 2003, Robe obtained approval to expand West Angelas to 25 million
tonnes per
year. Work is scheduled to begin on the US$105 million expansion in early 2004
and is expected to be complete by mid 2005.
Robe uses a dedicated rail system, operated by Pilbara Rail, to transport ore from its mines to the companys
deepwater port facilities at Cape Lambert for export.
Robe exports under medium and long term supply contracts with major integrated steel mill customers in Japan, Europe, South Korea and China.
2003 operating performance
Robes
total production in 2003 was a record 45.1 million tonnes, comprising 32 million
tonnes from Pannawonica, and 13.1 million tonnes from West Angelas.
Total sales were 43.9 million tonnes, with strong demand for Robe products in all major markets. Sales included 31.1 million tonnes from Pannawonica and 12.8 million tonnes of West Angelas. Sales growth was based on increased West Angelas tonnage availability, and focused primarily on Japan, where all customers exercised their tonnage options. Further penetration of the Chinese market was also achieved. Increased marketing effort in China resulted in the signing of long term agreements with large steel mill customers. The mine development schedule for West Angelas has been accelerated in response to high customer demand.
The business met the challenges presented by the accelerated West Angelas production schedule, along with the introduction of new processes at the port and business improvement activities occurring at all sites. At both Pannawonica and West Angelas increased focus was placed on waste stripping and improved equipment availability. This year improved business planning processes were introduced to ensure effective communication and coordination between the sites.
Robes
safety performance continued to improve, with sustained use of behaviour
based safety tools such as peer observations and hazard identifications.
Increased priority has been placed on prompt reporting and investigation
of near misses.
Robes total sales of iron ore to major markets in 2003
Million
tonnes |
|
Japan | 26.2 |
Europe | 9.4 |
Other Asia | 3.1 |
China | 5.2 |
Total | 43.9 |
Iron Ore Company of Canada (Rio Tinto: 58.7 per cent) Following a capital restructuring, Rio Tintos interest in Iron Ore Company of Canada (IOC) increased from 56.1 per cent to 58.7 per
38 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
cent in
December 2002. Mitsubishi (26.2 per cent) and the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
Income Fund (15.1 per cent) are also shareholders in IOC, Canadas largest
iron ore pellet producer. IOC operates an open pit mine, concentrator and pellet
plant at Labrador City, Newfoundland, together with a 420 kilometre railway
to port facilities and the partially refurbished pellet plant at Sept-Iles,
Quebec.
Products are transported on IOCs
Quebec North Shore and Labrador Railway to Sept-Iles. The port is open all
year and handles ore carriers of up to 255,000 tonnes. IOC exports its concentrate
and pellet products to major North American, European and Asia Pacific steel
makers.
The Sept-Iles pellet plant remains closed, following the suspension in September 2001 of the US$240 million refurbishment project. IOC employs approximately 1,900 people and in April 1999, signed a five year agreement with the United Steelworkers of America. This is due for renegotiation at the end of February 2004.
2003 operating performance
The year was another challenging one for IOC. Difficult market conditions continued in North America as the steel industry there continued to restructure. Despite this, pellet sales volumes reached a record high through increased sales to existing customers in Europe and the Asia/Pacific.
Pellet production returned to 2001 levels, well above 2002. However, IOC experienced operational difficulties, particularly with the commissioning of the control system on its ATO (Automatic Train Operation) system in the first half. This lead to a shortfall in planned concentrate production for the year.
During 2003, IOC maintained its focus on the cost reduction programme that commenced in 2002 and workforce reductions continued as planned under the accelerated retirement programme. IOC also made gains in improving the reliability of key production systems, positioning it for 2004. Emphasis on improved safety performance continues.
IOCs total sales of iron ore to major markets in 2003 | |
Million
tonnes |
|
North America | 4.7 |
Europe | 6.5 |
Asia Pacific | 3.7 |
Total | 14.9 |
IRON
ORE GROUP PROJECTS
HIsmelt® (Rio
Tinto: 60 per cent)
Construction
began in January 2003 on a HIsmelt® plant at Kwinana in
Western Australia. The HIsmelt® process is a revolutionary
direct iron smelting technology developed largely by Rio Tinto that will
convert iron ore fines into high quality pig iron (96 per cent iron content)
without the use of coke ovens and sinter plants. Notably, the
technology allows efficient processing of ore fines with higher levels of impurities, the current market for which is limited using standard blast furnace technology and operating techniques.
The HIsmelt® project at Kwinana is a joint venture between Rio Tinto (60 per cent interest through its subsidiary, HIsmelt® Corporation), US steelmaker Nucor Corporation (25 per cent), Mitsubishi Corporation (ten per cent), and Chinese steel maker Shougang Corporation (five per cent).
The plant will have a production capability of 800,000 tonnes per year and the project is on budget and on schedule to commence production at the end of 2004.
In 2003, HIsmelt® signed a process licence agreement with the Laiwu Steel Group Ltd. of China to allow for the development of an iron making facility using HIsmelt® technology.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 39 |
Operational review continued
Energy group
Coal | Coal |
(Rio Tinto share) | (Rio Tinto share) |
million tonnes | million tonnes |
MINED | RESERVES |
Energy
Earnings
contribution
US$m
Note:
2003 and 2002
exclude exceptional items
Rio Tinto
Energy groups coal interests are in Australia and the US. They supply
internationally traded and domestic US and Australian markets. Following the
disposal of Rio Tintos coal interest in Colombia in early 2000, acquisitions
in late 2000 and early 2001 enhanced the existing interests in New South Wales,
Australia. During 2003, Rio Tintos 50 per cent interest in Kaltim Prima
Coal was sold to an Indonesian company. The group also includes Rössing
in Namibia and Energy Resources of Australia. Both companies supply uranium
oxide for use in electricity generation.
In 2003, Rio Tinto formed a single management organisation to manage the Energy groups
coal assets in Australia. Rio Tinto and Coal & Allied Industries (Rio Tinto 75.7 per cent) agreed to combine Coal & Allied
corporate and service functions with those of Pacific Coal to increase efficiencies
and lower costs. Pacific Coal (Rio Tinto 100 per cent) was renamed Rio Tinto
Coal Australia (RTCA). Effective 1 February 2004, RTCA will manage both Pacific
Coals existing assets and Coal & Allieds assets in the Hunter
Valley in a centralised management structure which provides for shared costs.
At 31 December 2003, the Energy group accounted for 14 per cent of Group operating assets and, in 2003, contributed 20 per cent of Rio Tintos
turnover and 11 per cent of adjusted earnings. Adjusted earnings are explained
on page 32.
Preston Chiaro, chief executive Energy, is based in London.
FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
2003
compared with 2002
The Energy groups
2003 contribution to earnings was US$157 million, US$196 million lower than in
2002.
In Indonesia, earnings from Kaltim Prima Coal up to the time of its sale to Indonesian interests in October were US$31 million.
2002 compared with 2001
The
Energy groups
earnings contribution in 2002 at US$353 million was US$20 million lower than
in 2001. A
strengthening Australian dollar and higher costs associated with flooding
and high wall instability at Cordero Rojo were the main components of the lower
result.
Kennecott Energy (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent) Kennecott Energy (KEC) wholly owns and operates four open cut coal mines in the Powder River Basin of Montana and Wyoming, US and has a 50 per cent interest in, but does not operate, the Decker mine in Montana. KEC also manages the Groups
interest in Colowyo Coal LP in Colorado, US and in total employs approximately
1,700 people.
One of the largest US producers, KEC sells to electricity generators predominantly in mid-western and southern states. Sales are made under multiple year contracts and on a spot basis for one year or less.
The domestic US market for low sulphur coal continues to grow due to its competitive
cost per delivered energy unit and restrictions on sulphur emissions by utilities. In the longer term, continued strong demand for low sulphur coal is projected following the announcement of construction of new coal fired generating capacity in the US.
2003 operating performance
KECs
attributable production of 108 million tonnes of coal was three per cent higher
than in 2002 as a result of higher demand for Antelope and Jacobs Ranch coals,
partially offset by lower production at Cordero Rojo and Colowyo. Geotechnical
instability at Cordero Rojo resulted in a change in mining methods that reduced
production whilst Colowyo reduced production in line with market demand. Earnings
of US$88 million were slightly lower than 2002 earnings of US$90 million. This
decrease represents higher volumes that were offset by higher costs to mine at
Cordero Rojo and higher fuel prices.
In November 2003, KEC streamlined administrative staffing among its five operating mines and its headquarters office to improve the efficiency of operations.
KEC demonstrated a considerably better safety performance in 2003, with a 39 per cent improvement in the lost time injury frequency rate.
Rio
Tinto Coal Australia (RTCA)
(Rio Tinto: 100 per cent)
RTCA, formerly Pacific Coal, manages the Groups
Australian coal interests. These comprise Blair Athol (Rio Tinto 71 per cent),
Kestrel (Rio Tinto 80 per cent), Tarong (Rio Tinto 100 per cent) and Hail Creek
coal mines (Rio Tinto 92 per cent) and the Clermont deposit (Rio Tinto 50 per
cent). Effective 1 February 2004, RTCA will also provide management services
to Coal & Allied for day to day operation of its four mines.
Around 60 per cent of Blair Athol thermal coal is sold under contracts extending to 2010 to its two Japanese joint venture partners. The rest is sold by long term and annual agreements to European and Southeast Asian customers.
Production from the wholly owned Tarong mine is sold to Tarong Energy Corporation, an adjacent State owned power utility. A ten year contract for up to seven million tonnes annually expires in 2011.
Kestrel is an underground mine where thermal and metallurgical coal production recommenced in June 1999. Sales to customers in Japan, south east Asia, Europe and Central America are generally on annual agreements.
Construction of the 5.5 million tonnes per annum Hail Creek metallurgical coal project is essentially complete. Development of the project in central Queensland commenced in 2001 and the mine was officially opened on 5 November 2003. Production of high quality metallurgical coal commenced in July 2003 with commercial shipments beginning in October. Market acceptance has been strong in all markets, particularly China.
RTCA employs some 1,052 people (including regular contractors).
40 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
2003 operating performance
RTCAs
earnings of US$70 million were 48 per cent lower than in 2002 due to the unfavourable
exchange rate movement and lower thermal coal prices. Export prices were down
seven per cent and domestic prices down 25 per cent. There were also increased
costs at Kestrel and Tarong.
Production
at Blair Athol increased from 11.8 million tonnes to 12.5 million tonnes
while sales were 12.6 million. Kestrels
production decreased by 19 per cent to 3.3 million tonnes while shipments
of 3.7 million tonnes of coking and thermal coal were in line with 2002.
Production in 2003 was impacted by poorer mining conditions in the last longwall
panels in the 200 series mining area. Mining from the new Ti Tree area, predominantly
coking quality coal, commenced in January 2004. At Tarong, production increased
to 6.5 million tonnes in line with increased demand at Tarong Energy Corporation.
Hail Creek production commenced in July 2003. Production and sales were 0.9
million tonnes of which 0.7 million tonnes were shipped.
In
late 2002, Hail Creek commenced the recruitment of its operating employees.
The 16 former
employees retrenched from Blair Athol in 1997 applied but were unsuccessful
in gaining employment at Hail Creek. The Construction, Forestry, Mining
and Energy Union (CFMEU) successfully applied to the Australian Industrial
Relations
Commission for an Exceptional Matters Order that requires Hail Creek to
grant preferential employment to the former employees unless the company
is able
to satisfy the Commission that the employees are not suitable.
The company has challenged the order before the Federal Court of Australia. The hearing is scheduled for February 2004. Until this challenge is determined, Hail Creek must comply with the order.
The improved safety performance of 2002 was not sustained. Safety performance during 2003 returned to the levels of 2001.
Coal & Allied
Industries
(Rio Tinto: 75.7 per cent)
Coal & Allied Industries (Coal & Allied) is publicly listed on the Australian Stock Exchange and had a market capitalisation of A$2.0 billion (US$1.5 billion) at 31 December 2003. In 2003, Coal & Allied, through a committee of independent directors, negotiated an agreement with Rio Tinto to combine Coal & Allieds
corporate and management functions with those of Rio Tinto Coal Australia. The
combined management organisation reduces costs, achieves economies of scale and
removes duplicated functions for both Coal & Allied and Rio Tinto.
Coal & Allieds
assets are all located within the Hunter Valley in New South Wales, Australia.
It wholly owns Hunter Valley Operations, has an 80 per cent interest in Mount
Thorley Operations and a 55.57 per cent interest in the contiguous Warkworth
mine, and a 40 per cent interest in the Bengalla mine which abuts its wholly
owned Mount Pleasant development project. Coal &
Allied also
has a 37 per cent interest in Port Waratah Coal Services.
Coal & Allied produces thermal and semi soft coal. Most of its thermal coal is sold under contracts to electrical or industrial customers in Japan, Korea and elsewhere in Asia. The balance is sold in Europe and in Australia. Coal & Allieds
semi soft coal is exported to steel producing customers in Asia and Europe
under a combination of long term contracts and spot business.
2003 operating performance
A loss of US$24 million was incurred as a result of the stronger Australian dollar, lower coal prices and increased demurrage costs, compared with earnings of US$68 million in 2002. Good progress was made in implementing operational cost reductions including the agreement to combine corporate and management functions with those of RTCA in order to improve performance in 2004 and beyond.
Rio
Tintos
share of coal production was 15.4 million tonnes, a reduction of 13 per cent
on 2002, principally resulting from divestments in 2002 and operational changes
in 2003 to reduce saleable production to align with market conditions.
Abnormal
vessel queues at the port of Newcastle and rail congestion in the Hunter
Valley rail system increased demurrage costs. Coal & Allied is working
with the other parties to increase the productivity of the logistical chains
in the Hunter Valley. However, congestion remains an issue for 2004.
Agreement was reached with the joint venture partners at Mount Thorley and Warkworth to integrate operations to improve efficiencies and reduce costs. Workforce agreements were agreed at Warkworth, Mount Thorley and Hunter Valley operations in late 2003.
Rössing Uranium (Rio Tinto: 68.6 per cent)
Rössing
produces and exports uranium oxide from Namibia to European, US and Asia Pacific
electricity producers. Production has been lower than the 4,500 tonnes per year
capacity for some years due to market conditions. Rössing employs approximately
800 people.
2003 operating performance
Total production of 2,401 tonnes of uranium oxide was lower than 2002 as a result of a shutdown at the start of the year to install a new tailings conveyor system. Expiring long term higher priced sales contracts were replaced by contracts in line with 2003 market prices. These lower realised prices combined with the strengthening of the Namibian dollar against the US dollar resulted in a loss of US$19 million compared with a US$23 million profit in 2002. Initiatives to deliver cost savings continued. Plans to extend the current open pit for production beyond 2007 were suspended.
In 2003, Rössings
safety performance continued to improve with a 41 per cent reduction in the
lost time injury frequency rate.
Energy Resources of Australia
(Rio Tinto: 68.4 per cent)
Energy Resources of Australia Ltd (ERA) is publicly listed and had a market capitalisation of A$0.6 billion (US$0.5 billion) at
31 December 2003. ERA employs approximately 240 people with 12 per cent of the operational workforce represented by Aboriginal people.
ERA produces uranium oxide at the Ranger open pit mine, 260 kilometres east of Darwin in the Northern Territory. ERA also has title to the nearby Jabiluka mineral lease, which in 2003 was put on long term care and maintenance. Ranger has a 5,500 tonnes per year capacity and began production in 1981. Estimated ore reserves are sufficient for more than eight years at current mining rates. ERAs
operations including Jabiluka have been progressively surrounded by, but
remain separate from, the World Heritage listed Kakadu National Park and
especially stringent environmental requirements and governmental oversight
apply. ERA in 2003 was certified under ISO 14001 for its environment management
system. Uranium oxide from Ranger is sold to base load electricity utilities
in Japan, Korea, Europe and North America.
2003 operating performance
Uranium oxide production totalling
5,134 tonnes was higher than the previous year in response to greater sales commitments. Stronger prices were offset by the strengthening Australian dollar and resulted in earnings of US$11 million, a reduction of US$1 million from 2002.
Safety performance for 2003 deteriorated against 2002 in terms of lost time injuries.
ENERGY GROUP PROJECTS
Clermont Coal (Rio Tinto: 50 per cent)
The
Clermont deposit is near RTCAs
Blair Athol mine. It is suited to open cut development. A prefeasibility study
of the project was completed in 2003. A feasibility study is planned to commence
in 2004. Integration options with Blair Athol are available following the signing
of a strategic alliance agreement by the Blair Athol and Clermont Joint Ventures.
JPower (EPDC) joined the Clermont Joint Venture after acquiring a 15 per cent
interest from Rio Tinto and Mitsubishi.
Mount Pleasant (Rio Tinto: 75.7 per cent) Development of the Mount Pleasant project continued with a prefeasibility study being undertaken in 2002 and further optimisation work in 2003.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 41 |
Operational review continued
Industrial Minerals group
Borates | Borates |
(Rio Tinto share) | (Rio Tinto share) |
000 tonnes B2O3 content | 000 tonnes B2O3 content |
PRODUCTION | RESERVES |
Titanium dioxide | Titanium dioxide |
(Rio Tinto share) | (Rio Tinto share) |
000 tonnes | 000 tonnes |
PRODUCTION | RESERVES |
Industrial Minerals | |
Earnings contribution | |
US$m |
Rio
Tintos Industrial Minerals group produces borates, industrial salt, talc
and titanium dioxide feedstock. Rio Tinto Borax, Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium,
Luzenacs talc operations and Dampier Salt, its principal businesses, are
leading suppliers of their products.
The
Industrial Minerals group employed approximately 7,000 people in 2003.
At
31 December 2003, the Industrial Minerals group accounted for 13 per cent of
the Groups
operating assets and contributed approximately 15 per cent of Rio Tintos
turnover and 11 per cent of adjusted earnings in 2003. Adjusted earnings are
explained on page 32.
Tom
Albanese, chief executive Industrial Minerals, is based in London.
FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
2003 compared with 2002
Industrial
Minerals contribution to 2003 earnings was US$154 million, 46 per cent
lower than in 2002, reflecting the significant weakening of the US dollar against
both the Canadian dollar and South African rand and continued weakness across
North American and European markets.
Rio
Tinto Borax earnings were eight per cent lower at US$80 million. The cost base
was negatively impacted by higher natural gas and diesel prices, rising employee
benefit costs in California and net one off charges.
Rio
Tinto Iron & Titanium earnings at US$47 million were 71 per cent lower
than in 2002 due to the effect of the weak US dollar, soft market conditions
and
a charge associated with the writedown of a customer receivable in 2003.
2002
compared with 2001
Industrial
Minerals contribution to earnings in 2002 was US$286 million, 11 per
cent lower than in 2001, reflecting weaker market conditions and reduced pension
credits.
Rio
Tinto Boraxs
2002 earnings were 15 per cent lower at US$87 million. Cost improvements were
more than offset by reduced pension credits on lower market returns and a higher
effective tax rate.
Rio
Tinto Iron & Titanium (RIT) earnings at US$161 million in 2002 were 11
per cent lower than in 2001 due both to market conditions and the effect of
reduced
pigment demand in 2001.
Rio
Tinto Borax (Rio
Tinto: 100 per cent)
Rio Tinto Boraxs
Boron mine in Californias Mojave Desert is the worlds
largest borate mine. Borates are used in the US for vitreous applications,
such as fibreglass,
glass wool, high temperature glasses and enamels. The perborate industry, a
major market in Europe, uses borates as bleach in detergents. Other
uses include
ceramics, fertilisers, flame retardants, wood preservatives and corrosion inhibitors.
Rio
Tinto Boraxs
US and UK research laboratories provide technical support and participate in
collaborative projects with customers.
2003
operating performance
Net earnings
from Rio Tinto Borax at US$80 million
were eight per cent below the previous year. Production of borates was six per
cent higher than 2002 at 559,000 tonnes. Sales were four per cent higher than
2002, due to the combined impact of euro denominated sales and volume growth
in the North American and Asian markets. The cost base was affected by higher
natural gas and diesel prices, rising employee benefit costs in California and
net one off charges.
An
expansion of boric acid capacity at Boron was announced in 2003 and is scheduled
to come on stream in 2005 to meet rising global demand for boric acid.
Rio
Tinto Iron & Titanium
(Rio Tinto:
100 per cent)
Rio
Tinto Iron & Titanium (RIT) comprises the wholly owned QIT-Fer et Titane
(QIT) in Quebec, Canada and the 50 per cent interest in Richards Bay Minerals
(RBM)
in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Both produce titanium dioxide feedstock used
by customers to manufacture pigments for paints and surface coatings, plastics
and paper, as well as iron and zircon co-products.
QITs
proprietary process technology enables it to supply both the sulphate and chloride
pigment manufacturing methods. Its upgraded slag (UGS) plant supplies the growing
chloride sector and is designed for expansion in line with demand up to a capacity
of 600,000 tonnes per year from its current level of 250,000 tonnes. During
2003, RIT announced an expansion of its UGS plant to 325,000 tonnes per annum,
with new production scheduled to commence by early 2005.
RBMs
ilmenite has a low alkali content which makes its feedstock suitable for the
chloride pigment process. RBM can sustain one million tonnes of feedstock production
annually.
2003
operating performance
Earnings
from Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium (RIT) of US$47 million were 71 per cent
lower than in 2002. The weakening US dollar had a significant adverse effect
on the
result, as did the combined impact of the absence of a one off benefit in 2002
and a charge associated with the write down of a customer receivable in 2003.
Titanium
dioxide pigment demand decreased slightly in 2003. The titanium dioxide feedstock
side of the industry continued to be affected by the oversupply of conventional
grade chloride feedstocks and persistent high feedstock inventory levels at
some pigment producers. In contrast, demand for very high grade feedstock products,
such as UGS, remains strong. Overall, RIT shipments of titanium dioxide feedstocks
were lower in 2003, reflecting both market conditions and the effect of new
capacity in the market. Production at both QIT and RBM was curtailed accordingly.
42 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Demand for iron and steel co-products improved during 2003, with increased demand and higher prices. Zircon markets continued to tighten, with demand from China being particularly strong.
Dampier
Salt (Rio
Tinto: 64.9 per cent)
Dampier Salt (DSL), now the worlds
largest salt exporter, produces industrial salt by solar evaporation at Dampier,
Port Hedland and Lake MacLeod, and also mines gypsum at Lake MacLeod, in Western
Australia.
The chemical industry in Asia is the principal customer for DSLs
salt whilst gypsums main use is in wallboard and cement manufacture.
2003 operating performance
Dampier Salts
earnings were US$10 million in 2003, 58 per cent lower than 2002. While shipments
of salt and gypsum increased by four and 13 per cent respectively, margins were
severely eroded by the rise of the Australian dollar, the extremely tight freight
market and excess salt supply capacity. Salt production was in line with 2002,
at 7.1 million tonnes (Rio Tinto share: 4.6 million tonnes).
A new process plant at Dampier was approved to reduce costs and improve product quality. Construction should be complete by the end of 2004.
Luzenac
Group (Rio
Tinto: 99.9 per cent)
The Luzenac Group operates talc mines, including the worlds
largest in south west France, and processing facilities in Australia, Austria,
Belgium, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Spain, the UK and the US.
Luzenac products are used internationally. Principal uses are in paper, paints, cosmetics, ceramics, agricultural and plastics industries.
2003 operating performance
Earnings in 2003 at US$17 million were 21 per cent higher than the previous year. Luzenacs
production in 2003 was two per cent higher than 2002 at 1.36 million tonnes.
Sales volumes were maintained from 2002, while improvements in pricing were partially offset by the effect of the sales mix.
The key paper and polymer markets remained weak in 2003 on both sides of the Atlantic, while Asia continued to demonstrate strong volume growth.
There was continued rationalisation of operating and service sites, which contributed a number of one off redundancy and restructuring charges.
INDUSTRIAL MINERALS
GROUP
PROJECTS
QIT Madagascar Minerals
(Rio Tinto: 80 per cent)
RIT manages QIT Madagascar Minerals (QMM), in which an agency of the Government of Madagascar has a 20 per cent interest. QMM was formed to evaluate and, if appropriate, develop large mineral sand deposits in the south east of Madagascar.
In November 2001, QMM was granted an environmental permit by the Government for the proposed minerals sands project. The permit requires QMM to comply with a full range of social and environmental obligations throughout the life of a project.
A feasibility study is progressing and RIT is working with the Government, as well as all other interested and affected parties, with a view to developing the project.
Rio Colorado Potash (Rio
Tinto: Option to acquire 100 per cent)
In 2003, Rio Tinto entered into an option
agreement to acquire 100 per cent of Potasio Rio Colorado SA, an Argentine
company holding the mineral rights and other assets of the Rio Colorado potash
project. The project is located 1,000 kilometres south west of Buenos Aires,
in the provinces of Mendoza and Neuquen. The option runs until late 2005, during
which time Rio Tinto will evaluate the commercial potential for developing
the project.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 43 |
Operational review continued
Aluminium
group
Weipa bauxite | Weipa bauxite | |
(Rio Tinto share) | (Rio Tinto share) | |
million tonnes | million tonnes | |
MINED | RESERVES |
Alumina | Aluminium | |
(Rio Tinto share) | (Rio Tinto share) | |
000 tonnes | 000 tonnes | |
PRODUCTION | PRODUCTION |
Rio Tinto
Aluminium
Earnings
contribution
US$m
Rio
Tintos Aluminium group encompasses its wholly owned, integrated aluminium
subsidiary, Comalco and its 51 per cent share in Anglesey Aluminium. Rio Tinto
acquired the publicly held 27.6 per cent of Comalco in 2000. Management responsibility
for Anglesey Aluminium was transferred from the Copper group to Aluminium
in June 2003.
At
31 December 2003, the Aluminium group accounted for 21 per cent of Rio Tintos
operating assets and in 2003 contributed 16 per cent of Group turnover and
14 per cent of adjusted earnings. Adjusted earnings are explained on page
32.
Sam
Walsh, chief executive Aluminium, is based in Brisbane, Queensland.
FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
2003 compared with 2002
Rio Tinto Aluminiums
contribution to 2003 earnings was US$200 million, a decrease of 22 per cent.
Stronger
aluminium prices increased earnings by US$51 million with the average three
month price in 2003 at 65 US cents per pound compared with 61 US cents per
pound in 2002. The effect of the weakening US currency reduced Rio Tinto Aluminiums
earnings by US$111 million.
2002
compared with 2001
Rio Tinto Aluminiums
contribution to 2002 earnings was US$256 million, a decrease of 22 per cent
from 2001.
Lower
prices reduced earnings by US$44 million with the average three month aluminium
price in 2002 at 61 US cents per pound compared with 66 US cents in 2001.
The strengthening Australian and New Zealand currencies reduced Rio Tinto
Aluminiums
earnings by US$13 million.
Rio
Tinto Aluminium
(Rio Tinto: 100
per cent)
Rio Tinto Aluminium
is a major supplier of bauxite, alumina and primary aluminium to world markets.
It employs some 4,200 people.
Rio
Tinto Aluminium has a large, wholly owned bauxite mine on Cape York Peninsula,
Queensland. Approximately 90 per cent of the bauxite from Weipa is shipped
to alumina refineries at Gladstone, Queensland and Sardinia, Italy. It is
also entitled to four per cent of bauxite output from the Boké
mine, Guinea, West Africa.
Rio
Tinto Aluminium has a 56.2 per cent consortium interest in Eurallumina and
increased its interest in Queensland Alumina Limited (QAL) from 30.3 to 38.6
per cent for US$189 million in September 2001.
In
January 2002, construction of a wholly owned, US$750 million alumina refinery
commenced. The Comalco Alumina Refinery will produce 1.4 million tonnes of
alumina annually at Gladstone, Queensland.
In
2003, Comalco signed a long term alumina supply agreement with Norsk Hydro,
the Norwegian industrial group, to initially supply 300,000 tonnes of alumina
in 2005
and
then 500,000 tonnes of alumina per year for more than 20 years to Hydro Aluminiums
smelters in Australia and elsewhere. The alumina will be sourced from QAL
and the new Comalco Alumina Refinery at Gladstone.
In
July 2002, Comalco completed the acquisition of an additional 9.5 per cent
of lines 1 & 2 at Boyne Island smelter for US$78.5 million. This increased
Comalcos
overall ownership of the Boyne Island smelter from 54.2 per cent to 59.4 per
cent.
In
addition to the Boyne Island smelter, smelters at Bell Bay (100 per cent)
in Tasmania, Tiwai Point (79.4 per cent) in New Zealand and Anglesey Aluminium
(51 per cent) in Wales, produce Rio Tinto Aluminiums
primary aluminium.
2003
operating performance
Bauxite production
at Weipa was 11.9 million tonnes, six per cent higher than in 2002. This was
due to improved performance and to facilitate a build in inventory in advance
of the requirement to supply the Comalco Alumina Refinery which will be commissioned
during the second half of 2004. Weipa bauxite shipments at 11.4 million tonnes
increased slightly compared with 2002 levels.
QAL
production was four per cent above 2002 due largely to record process flows
notwithstanding the adverse impacts of external power outages in both years.
Eurallumina production increased marginally over 2002 levels.
At
Gladstone in Australia, drought conditions continued into 2003 with all operations
continuing to achieve the required 25 per cent cutback in water use with no
interruption to production. All operations have voluntarily retained these
reduced water levels despite restrictions being lifted due to abundant rainfall
in the local catchment.
Rio
Tinto Aluminiums
share of aluminium production from its four smelters at 818,000 tonnes was
23,000 tonnes above 2002 production. This includes the first full year of
the additional share of the Boyne Island smelter that was purchased in 2002.
These figures also take into account production at the Anglesey Aluminium
smelter for both years.
Production
at the Tiwai Point smelter was constrained by high spot electricity prices
in New Zealand in the first half of 2003. This was more than offset by record
production in the second half of the year following the resumption of spot
electricity purchases in June 2003. Production at Bell Bay and Anglesey Aluminium
was marginally higher than in 2002.
Attributable
metal shipments of 820,000 tonnes went to similar destinations as 2002, being
primarily Japan, Australia, Europe and Korea.
44 | Rio
Tinto 2003 Annual
report and financial statements |
ALUMINIUM
GROUP PROJECTS
Comalco Alumina Refinery
(Rio Tinto: 100
per cent)
Following approval
in October 2001 and ground work preparation in December, large scale construction
of the US$750 million first stage of a new greenfield alumina refinery at
Gladstone began in January 2002. The refinery will enable Rio Tinto Aluminium
to add further value to the Weipa bauxite deposit and strengthen both Rio
Tinto Aluminiums
and Australias positions in the world alumina market.
The
majority of the refinerys
output will go into Rio Tinto Aluminium smelters. The balance will be placed
in the traded alumina market. Rio Tinto Aluminium will, however, become a
more significant player in the traded alumina market after the 1.4 million
tonnes per year refinery comes into production.
During
2003, work continued on schedule and within budget with engineering design
work concluded and construction 58 per cent complete by year end. First production
is due in the fourth quarter of 2004, with initial shipments in the first
quarter of 2005 and full capacity by the end of 2006. There is potential for
the refinery capacity to increase to over four million tonnes per year when
market conditions allow.
Weipa mine expansion
(Rio Tinto: 100 per cent)
A US$150 million expansion of the Weipa bauxite operation was started in 2003 to increase output of beneficiated bauxite to 16.5 million tonnes per year. The increase in production will help meet the demands of the new Comalco Alumina Refinery. The majority of the expenditure is on a 9.5 million tonne beneficiation plant to allow mining of lower grade fine ores. The NeWeipa expansion project is due for completion in 2004.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 45 |
Operational review continued
Copper group
Copper | Copper | |
(Rio Tinto share) | (Rio Tinto share) | |
000 tonnes | 000 tonnes | |
MINED | RESERVES |
Copper | Copper | |
(Rio Tinto share) | Earnings contribution | |
000 tonnes | US$m | |
REFINED |
Note:
2003, 2002 and 2001 exclude
exceptional items
Gold | Gold | |
(Rio Tinto share) | (Rio Tinto share) | |
000 tonnes | 000 ounces | |
MINED | RESERVES |
Rio
Tintos Copper group comprises Kennecott Utah Copper in the US and interests
in the copper mines of Escondida in Chile, Grasberg in Indonesia, Neves Corvo
in Portugal, Northparkes in Australia and Palabora in South Africa. The group
also includes the Zinkgruvan zinc mine in Sweden, Kennecott Minerals in the
US and Rio Tinto Brasil as well as Kennecott Land.
In
2003, Rio Tinto divested its interests in the Alumbrera and Peak Gold mines
for US$210 million.
At
31 December 2003, the Copper group, which produces gold as a significant co-product,
accounted for 21 per cent of the Groups operating assets and, in 2003,
contributed approximately 23 per cent of Rio Tintos turnover, of which
55 per cent was from copper and the remainder mostly from gold. It accounted
for 32 per cent of adjusted earnings in 2003. Adjusted earnings are explained
on page 32.
Oscar
Groeneveld, chief executive Copper, is based in London.
FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
2003 compared with 2002
The Copper groups
contribution to earnings was US$440 million, US$99 million higher than in
2002. The average price of copper was 80 US cents per pound compared to
71 US cents in
2002. The average gold price of US$363 per ounce increased by 17 per cent.
Kennecott
Utah Coppers contribution to earnings of US$88 million was broadly in
line with 2002.
Earnings
at Escondida increased to US$122 million despite constrained output in response
to weak market demand. Mined production of copper was up 32 per cent (Rio
Tinto share) due to the commissioning of the new Laguna Seca concentrator.
Freeports
earnings contribution decreased by US$5 million to US$127 million chiefly
as a result of the slippage in October. This had an adverse effect on both
volumes and costs. In the fourth quarter, lower grade material was mined from
the open pit and near term mine operations are being directed to accelerating
the removal of waste material to ensure the restoration of safe access to
the higher grade areas. Despite full production from the underground mine,
mill throughput was significantly below capacity.
Earnings
at Palabora decreased to US$1 million in 2003 due to the negative effect of
the stronger rand in relation to the US dollar combined with lower volumes
and higher costs resulting from delays in reaching capacity in the underground
mine.
2002
compared with 2001
The
Copper groups contribution to earnings in 2002 was US$341 million, US$35
million higher than in 2001. The average price of copper was 71 US cents per
pound compared to 72 US cents in 2001. The average gold price of US$309 per
ounce increased by 14 per cent.
Kennecott
Utah Coppers contribution to earnings of US$86 million in 2002 was broadly
in line with 2001. Adjusted earnings exclude the effect of exceptional charges
relating to asset write downs and a provision for environmental remediation.
A downward revision to the Groups long term copper price assumption
resulted in an exceptional charge of US$480 million relating to the impairment
of asset carrying values. KUC has been investigating the treatment of contaminated
groundwater in the vicinity of Bingham Canyon since before 1989, when Rio
Tinto acquired the business. As a result of changes to the treatment plan,
an additional provision of US$116 million was raised during 2002. This provision
relates to costs to be incurred over a number of years.
Earnings
at Escondida in 2002 decreased 22 per cent to US$32 million as output was
constrained in response to weak market demand. Freeports earnings contribution
in 2002 increased by US$40 million to US$132 million as a result of higher
copper grades and recoveries and higher gold prices, partly offset by lower
gold volumes.
Earnings
at Palabora decreased marginally to US$12 million in 2002. The positive effect
of the weaker rand was more than offset by lower volumes and higher costs
as the operation moved from the open pit to the underground.
Kennecott
Utah Copper
(Rio Tinto: 100
per cent)
Kennecott Utah
Copper (KUC) operates the Bingham Canyon mine, Copperton concentrator and
Garfield smelter complex, near Salt Lake City, US.
KUC
supplies more than ten per cent of annual US refined copper requirements and
employs approximately 1,400 people. Negotiation of a new labour agreement,
to last until September 2009, was concluded in June. The new agreement provides
for greater flexibility in deployment of personnel and assignment of work.
Options
for the extension of open pit mining beyond the current pit plan of 2013 are
under active investigation.
Mining
and milling at Barneys Canyon ended in 2001 but gold production continues
until 2005. The operation employs about 20 people.
KUC, as the owner of 53 per cent of the undeveloped land in the Salt Lake
Valley of Utah, has formed Kennecott Land to develop about 16,000 hectares
of the 37,200 hectares owned. The initial 1,800 hectare Daybreak project site
lies in the path of expanding residential areas. Kennecott Land has the right
to build roads, make utility connections and prepare the land for sale to
builders who will construct houses for 30,000 people. Rio Tinto is initially
investing US$50 million with revenues expected to start in 2004.
46 | Rio
Tinto 2003 Annual
report and financial statements
|
2003
operating performance
Earnings
of US$88 million were US$2 million above 2002. Higher copper, gold and molybdenum
prices more than offset lower by product grades even though these resulted
in lower gold and molybdenum volumes. By product grades will return to life
of mine averages in 2005.
Refined
copper production was 21 per cent lower than in 2002. Production in the first
half of the year was adversely affected by a failure in the final absorption
tower of the acid plant which stopped smelter production for three weeks.
Smelter efficiency was affected throughout the year by the processing of lower
grade concentrate with lower copper to sulphur ratios.
The
negotiation of a new labour agreement was concluded in June 2003. The new
agreement has increased flexibility for personnel and work assignments. Work
practice changes at the mine, together with the implementation of 12 hour
shifts has resulted in 12 haul trucks being stood down and a 20 per cent improvement
in truck productivity. The new agreement will enable changes to further increase
the efficiency of operations.
Principal operating statistics at KUC 2001-2003 | |||||
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||
Rock mined (000 tonnes) | 159,908 | 150,331 | 135,204 | ||
Ore milled (000 tonnes) | 48,566 | 40,720 | 46,105 | ||
Head grades: | |||||
Copper (%) | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.67 | ||
Gold (g/t) | 0.54 | 0.44 | 0.29 | ||
Silver (g/t) | 3.67 | 3.42 | 3.02 | ||
Molybdenum (%) | 0.042 | 0.034 | 0.027 | ||
Copper concentrates produced | |||||
(000 tonnes) | 1,108 | 992 | 1,147 | ||
Production of metals in copper concentrates | |||||
Copper (000 tonnes) | 312.7 | 260.2 | 281.8 | ||
Gold (000 ounces)* | 592 | 412 | 305 | ||
Silver (000 ounces) | 4,475 | 3,663 | 3,548 | ||
Molybdenum concentrates produced | |||||
(000 tonnes) | 14.5 | 11.2 | 8.8 | ||
Contained molybdenum | |||||
(000 tonnes) | 8.1 | 6.1 | 4.6 | ||
Concentrate smelted on site | |||||
(000 tonnes) | 975 | 1,096 | 1,060 | ||
Production of refined metals | |||||
Copper (000 tonnes) | 234.3 | 293.7 | 230.6 | ||
Gold (000 ounces) | 389 | 488 | 308 | ||
Silver (000 ounces) | 2,882 | 4,037 | 2,963 | ||
* excludes Barneys Canyon. |
Grasberg
(Rio
Tinto: 40 per cent of joint venture plus 12 per cent of the balance through
its interest in FCX)
Grasberg, in Papua, Indonesia, is one of the worlds
largest copper and gold mines in terms of reserves and production. It is owned
and operated by Freeport Indonesia (PTFI), the principal and 91 per cent owned
subsidiary of the US based Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold (FCX). Rio Tinto
has a 13 per cent direct interest in FCX.
At
least one per cent of Grasbergs
net sales revenues has been committed to support village based programmes.
In addition, two new trust funds were
established
in 2001 in recognition of the traditional land rights of the local Amungme and
Komoro tribes. In 2003, PTFI contributed US$18 million (net of Rio Tinto portion)
and Rio Tinto US$4 million in total to the funds.
As
a result of training and educational programmes, Papuans represented more than
a quarter of PTFIs
approximately 9,000 workforce by the end of 2003.
2003
operating performance
In October
a slippage of approximately two million tonnes of saturated partially consolidated
rock occurred in the Grasberg open pit, tragically killing eight employees.
This was followed by a debris flow of 200,000 tonnes of similar material in
December. These occurrences resulted in disruption of ore production and the
deferral into late 2004 and 2005 of a portion of metal previously forecast to
be produced in the fourth quarter of 2003 and the first quarter of 2004. Detailed
planning is in progress to resume full production as soon as it is safe to do
so.
The
disruptions resulted in lower copper production than 2002 but due to significantly
higher gold grades, gold production exceeded 2002 by eight per cent. Rio Tintos
overall share of copper production decreased by 24 per cent to 193,000 tonnes,
but for gold increased by six per cent to 1,076,000 ounces.
Production
from the DOZ (deep ore zone) achieved design capacity of 25,000 tonnes per day
in the third quarter of 2002, one year earlier than anticipated, and has exceeded
capacity since then. Expansion of production to more than 35,000 tonnes per
day was achieved in the first quarter of 2003, and during the year exceeded
40,000 tonnes per day. A further expansion is under study.
Principal operating statistics for PTFI 2001-2003 | |||||
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||
Ore milled (000 tonnes) | 86,787 | 86,001 | 74,103 | ||
Head grades: | |||||
Copper (%) | 1.00 | 1.14 | 1.09 | ||
Gold (g/t) | 1.41 | 1.24 | 1.54 | ||
Silver (g/t) | 3.20 | 3.60 | 4.03 | ||
Production of metals in concentrates | |||||
Copper (000 tonnes) | 749.4 | 864.4 | 715.8 | ||
Gold (000 ounces) | 3,596 | 3,030 | 3,262 | ||
Silver (000 ounces) | 5,545 | 6,402 | 6,474 | ||
Escondida
(Rio
Tinto: 30 per cent)
The Escondida copper mine in Chile is the largest copper
mine in the world, with a mine life expected to exceed 30 years at current rates
of production. The mine is 57.5 per cent owned and managed by BHP Billiton.
Work
on the US$1.0 billion Phase 4 expansion project was completed in 2002, increasing
annual production capacity by an average of 400,000 tonnes. Production in 2003
was projected to be 1.2 million tonnes of copper, of which 1.05 million tonnes
would have been in concentrate.
In
response to market conditions, however, a decision to process lower grade
ore from November 2001 until the
third quarter of 2002 curtailed copper output by approximately ten per cent.
A further curtailment of 200,000 tonnes of copper in 2003 was announced in late
2002. Full production was resumed from the beginning of 2004. The Escondida
oxide plant was expanded by eight per cent to 150,000 tonnes of copper per year
capacity from March 2001.
Approval
was given in 2003 for the US$400 million Escondida Norte project. The satellite
deposit will provide mill feed to maintain capacity at Escondida above 1.2 million
tonnes per annum of copper. First production from Norte is expected in the fourth
quarter of 2005. Rio Tintos
share of the project cost is US$120 million.
Escondida
employs approximately 2,400 people.
2003 Operating performance
Mobile equipment performance improved in the
latter part of the year. Slow settling of sediment in water in the tailings
dam caused production restrictions in the Phase 4 project but this is being
progressively resolved. The Phase 4 project achieved an average throughput of
85,200 tonnes of ore per day in 2003.
Copper
production in 2003 was 36 per cent higher than in 2002 due to Phase 4.
Principal operating statistics at Escondida | |||||
2000-2002 | |||||
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||
Rock mined (000 tonnes) | 321,968 | 306,620 | 300,386 | ||
Ore milled (000 tonnes) | 43,042 | 46,536 | 70,347 | ||
Head grade: | |||||
Copper (%) | 1.81 | 1.58 | 1.43 | ||
Production of metals in concentrates | |||||
Copper (000 tonnes) | 643.1 | 622.6 | 847.0 | ||
Gold (000 ounces) | 101 | 126 | 184 | ||
Silver (000 ounces) | 3,198 | 2,981 | 4,728 | ||
Copper cathode (000 tonnes) | 151.0 | 138.7 | 147.6 | ||
Palabora
(Rio
Tinto: 49.2 per cent)
Palabora Mining Company (Palabora) is publicly quoted
with a market capitalisation of two billion rand (US$299 million) at 31 December
2003. Rio Tinto acquired an additional 0.7 per cent interest in Palabora through
the market in July 2001.
Palabora
has developed a US$460 million underground mine with a planned production
rate of 30,000 tonnes per day of ore. Approximately
1.6 million tonnes of copper are expected to be produced over its 20 year
life.
In
July, Palabora proceeded with a rights offer of debentures which successfully
raised approximately US$115 million to service existing debt commitments and
allow for completion of the underground project.
Palabora
supplies most of South Africas
copper needs and exports the balance. It employs approximately 2,000 people
and labour agreements are negotiated annually.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 47 |
Operational review continued
2003
operating performance
Mining
of the open pit ceased in 2002 apart from recovery of ore from the ramps that
continued until November 2003. This supplemented concentrator feed as the
underground mine ramped up production. The ramp up was hindered by poor performance
of remote rock breaking equipment. The target production rate of 30,000 tonnes
per day was achieved on several occasions during the fourth quarter and there
is confidence of achieving design capacity on an ongoing basis.
The
aggregate impact of the limited production from the underground mine, the
strength of the rand against the US dollar, partly offset by cost saving actions,
reduced earnings and led to additional borrowing requirements.
Principal operating statistics at Palabora | |||||
2001-2003 | |||||
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||
Ore milled (000 tonnes) | 14,522 | 9,933 | 11,415 | ||
Head grade: | |||||
Copper (%) | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.59 | ||
Copper concentrates | |||||
produced (000 tonnes) | 233.5 | 167.9 | 163.3 | ||
Contained copper | |||||
(000 tonnes) | 78.4 | 52.2 | 52.4 | ||
New concentrates smelted | |||||
on site (000 tonnes) | 310.4 | 258.6 | 267.6 | ||
Refined copper produced | |||||
(000 tonnes) | 86.9 | 81.6 | 73.4 | ||
Northparkes
(Rio
Tinto: 80 per cent)
Rio Tintos
interest in the Northparkes copper gold mine resulted from the acquisition
of North. Northparkes is a joint venture with the Sumitomo Group (20 per cent).
Following
an initial open pit operation at Northparkes in central New South Wales, Australia,
underground block cave mining began in 1997. With present and future developments,
the operation has a life of about 14 years at current production rates.
The
copper concentrate produced is shipped to smelters in Japan (67 per cent),
Australia (14 per cent) and other countries (19 per cent).
Northparkes
employs approximately 160 people.
2003
operating performance
Production
from the Lift 1 block cave ceased in early 2003 and is being replaced by the
Lift 2 block cave which is scheduled to commence production in 2004. Progress
with mine development for Lift 2 has been hampered by high rock stresses which
adversely affected mine development but will assist in the caving of the orebody
with good fragmentation. Costs were higher than projected.
Principal operating statistics at Northparkes | |||||
2001-2003 | |||||
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||
Ore milled (000 tonnes) | 5,425 | 5,364 | 5,168 | ||
Head grade: | |||||
Copper (%) | 1.16 | 0.86 | 0.67 | ||
Gold (g/t) | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.44 | ||
Production of contained metals | |||||
Copper (000 tonnes) | 55.1 | 38.4 | 27.1 | ||
Gold (000 ounces) | 41.5 | 40.8 | 48.6 | ||
Neves Corvo (Rio Tinto: 49 per cent) Sociedade Minera de Neves-Corvo (Somincor) owns and operates the high grade Neves Corvo copper and tin mine in Portugal. The process begun, in 2002, to sell Rio Tintos interest continued in 2003.
2003
operating performance
Programmes
to improve operational efficiency continued to reduce costs. Employee numbers
have decreased from 1,000 at the beginning of 2002 to 830 at the end of the
year. Copper production was similar to last year.
Principal operating statistics at Neves Corvo | |||||
2001-2003 | |||||
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||
Ore milled (000 tonnes): | |||||
Copper* | 2,021 | 1,756 | 1,700 | ||
Tin | 190 | 16 | 22 | ||
Head grades: | |||||
Copper (%) | 4.8 | 5.1 | 5.3 | ||
Tin (% tin ores only) | 1.6 | 3.3 | 2.2 | ||
Copper concentrates | |||||
produced (000 tonnes) | 344.3 | 319.4 | 329.6 | ||
Contained copper | |||||
(000 tonnes) | 82.9 | 77.2 | 77.5 | ||
Tin concentrates | |||||
produced (000 tonnes) | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | ||
Contained tin (000 tonnes) | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | ||
* Total ore treated for both copper and tin production. |
OTHER
MINERALS
Zinkgruvan
(Rio
Tinto: 100 per cent)
Rio Tintos
ownership of the Zinkgruvan underground zinc, lead and silver mine resulted
from the acquisition of North. Zinkgruvan is located in south central Sweden
and employs approximately 300 people. The mine has been in continuous production
for 140 years. It produces a high quality zinc concentrate as well as a lead
and silver concentrate which are sold to European smelters.
2003
operating performance
The difficulties
experienced with introducing paste backfill into the mine in 2002 were overcome
and the backlog of stope filling was steadily reduced. Production of zinc
and lead in 2003 were 34 per cent and 29 per cent higher than in 2002 due
to increased mill throughput and head grades.
Kennecott
Minerals
(Rio Tinto:
100 per cent)
Kennecott
Minerals, in the US, manages the Greens Creek mine (Rio Tinto: 70 per cent)
in Alaska and the Rawhide mine (Rio Tinto:
51
per cent) in Nevada. It also holds the Groups interest in Cortez/Pipeline
(Rio Tinto: 40 per cent), also in Nevada. At Cortez Hills a significant new
gold discovery in 2003 will add several million ounces of new reserves to
the mine life.
Ore
extraction from Rawhide was completed in October 2002 and reclamation work
has started. Processing of stockpiles will continue.
At
the former Flambeau, Wisconsin, copper mine, monitoring continues following
the 1999 rehabilitation and replanting programme. In 2002, an agreement was
reached for the reclaimed Ridgeway, South Carolina, gold mine to be used for
environmental education and research.
Kennecott
Minerals employs approximately 300 people.
2003
operating performance
Overall
gold production decreased by one per cent due to declining grades at the Cortez/Pipeline
gold mine and reduced throughput at Rawhide. Net earnings of US$60 million
were US$22 million above 2002, benefiting from higher gold prices.
Greens
Creek (Rio
Tinto: 70 per cent)
In addition to gold, the Kennecott Greens Creek mine on
Admiralty Island in Alaska, produces silver, zinc and lead.
2003
operating performance
Mill throughput
was seven per cent higher than in 2002, but due to lower grades, silver and
zinc production was approximately the same as in 2002.
Rio
Tinto Brasil (Rio
Tinto: 100 per cent)
Rio Tinto Brasil manages the Morro do Ouro gold mine
(Rio Tinto 51 per cent) and the Corumbá
iron ore operation. The wholly owned Fortaleza nickel complex was sold at
the end of the year.
Morro
do Ouro (Rio
Tinto: 51 per cent)
At the Morro do Ouro mine in the state of Minas Gerais,
a feasibility study is under way to expand gold production to 320,000 ounces
per year in 2007 by increasing mill throughput.
Morro
do Ouro employs approximately 570 people, most of them from the nearby town
of Paracatu.
2003
operating performance
Gold production
was 11 per cent lower due to lower head grades while throughput was similar.
Fortaleza
(Rio
Tinto: 100 per cent)
Rio
Tinto Brasil agreed the sale of Fortaleza nickel mine and smelter in the State
of Minas Gerais to a Brazilian mining company at the end of the year. The
final consideration, which is dependent on the forward nickel price, is expected
to be at least US$90 million.
48 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Corumbá
(Rio
Tinto: 100 per cent)
Rio
Tinto Brasil owns the Groups interest in Mineração Corumbaense
Reunida (Corumbá). Corumbás iron ore is barged along the
Paraguay River to South American and European customers.
2003
operating performance
Production
of lump ore was 25 per cent higher than in 2002.
COPPER
GROUP PROJECTS
Resolution
(Rio
Tinto: 55 per cent earn-in)
The Resolution project is situated in Arizona,
US, in the area of the depleted Magma copper mine. In 2001, an agreement was
signed with BHP Billiton Base Metals which allows Rio Tinto to earn a 55 per
cent interest in the Resolution project by spending US$25 million over six
years. In 2003, five deep exploration drillholes intersected significant copper
mineralisation, indicating a large deposit at depth. Rio Tinto anticipates
earning its 55 per cent interest in the project in early 2004. The project
is currently in the preliminary stages of a pre-feasibility study. It is anticipated
that studies will take some considerable time.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 49 |
Operational review continued
Diamonds group
Diamonds |
Diamonds |
(Rio Tinto share) | (Rio Tinto share) |
000 carats | 000 carats |
MINED | RESERVES |
Diamonds
Earnings
contribution
US$m
With
diamonds growing into a major product for Rio Tinto, the Diamonds group
was formed in 2003 from the former Diamonds & Gold group. It comprises
Rio Tintos
diamond interests in Australia, Canada and Zimbabwe, and diamond sales offices
in Belgium and India.
Rio
Tinto is a leading proponent of the Kimberley Process which seeks to ensure
that only legitimately mined and traded rough diamonds are introduced into
the world market.
At
31 December 2003, Diamonds accounted for eight per cent of the Groups
operating assets and, in 2003, contributed five per cent of Rio Tintos
turnover and eight per cent of adjusted earnings. Adjusted earnings are explained
on page 32.
Keith
Johnson, Group executive, Diamonds, is based in London.
FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
2003
compared with 2002
Diamonds
contributed US$113 million to earnings, up US$50 million from 2002, assisted
by the start of production from the Diavik mine. The comparative figures
are restated to reflect the reorganisation in 2003 of product group responsibilities,
with gold and other metal production accounted for under the Copper, Exploration
and Technology groups.
Demand
for rough diamonds was strong throughout the year with the rough market outperforming
the market for polished stones.
2002
compared with 2001
Diamonds
in 2002 contributed US$63 million to earnings, up US$5 million from 2001.
Diavik
Diamonds (Rio
Tinto: 60 per cent)
Diavik Diamond Mines Inc. (DDMI) owns Rio Tintos
interest in and manages the unincorporated Diavik Diamonds joint venture in
the Northwest Territories of Canada.
The
project was completed well ahead of schedule and within budget. Initial production
of gem quality diamonds commenced in January 2003 with commissioning of the
process plant.
DDMIs
commitment to work with aboriginal communities was formally concluded in five
participation agreements, providing training, employment and business opportunities.
Procurement contracts for the operating phase were negotiated with Aboriginal
businesses.
An
agency relationship between DDMI and Rio Tinto Diamonds for marketing DDMIs
share of diamond production was concluded in 2002.
2003
operating performance
Net
earnings were US$41 million. Initial sales of diamonds attracted a high level
of interest with prices being achieved at a significantly higher level than
originally projected.
The
mine was completed in January 2003 ahead of schedule and within budget. By
year end, the process plant was operating
at
design throughput of 1.5 million tonnes of ore per year, six months ahead
of schedule. Grades increased as mining progressed through the transition
zone where lake bed material meets the orebody proper. Results from bulk
sampling of the second kimberlite in the mining sequence, the A154North,
showed the quality of these diamonds to be much higher than originally
assumed.
A
strategic planning team separate from mine operations has been set up to look
at how best to capture the upside of higher than expected grades in both the
A154South and A154North kimberlites. Timing options are being studied for
going underground at these pipes and for construction of the A418 dike required
to mine the third kimberlite in the mine sequence. This work will be completed
over the next 12 months. Diavik includes some of the most valuable kimberlites
known in the western world.
Argyle
Diamonds (Rio
Tinto: 100 per cent)
Rio Tinto owns and operates the Argyle diamond mine in
Western Australia.
Production
from Argyles
major resource, the AK1 open pit mine, is expected to continue until 2007.
Approval has been given for a feasibility study into underground mining. This
will lead to a decision, expected in 2005, relating to mine closure or further
mine development. Development of an exploration decline commenced in 2003
to assist in confirming design criteria. The range of statutory approvals
required for underground operation includes environmental and social impact
assessments. Argyle employs approximately 725 people.
A
decision was taken at the Merlin diamond mine in Australia to cease operations
due to the depletion of economic resources. Rehabilitation work was completed
at the end of 2003.
2003
operating performance
Net
earnings of US$72 million were US$9 million above 2002. Argyles
results benefited from accumulated inventory sales. Diamond production for
2003 was down eight per cent on 2002 with 30.9 million carats produced. Performance
was marred by a fatality in May. Significant production in 2003 was from the
lower grade Northern domain of the AK1 pit. Alluvial mining was suspended
in 2002.
Rio
Tinto Zimbabwe (Rio
Tinto: 56 per cent)
Rio Tinto Zimbabwe is a publicly quoted company having
a significant local shareholding.
Its
interests include the Renco gold mine and the Empress Nickel refinery and
a 50 per cent interest in the Murowa project. The Patchway gold mine was sold
in July 2003. In total, Rio Tinto Zimbabwe employs approximately 1,600 people.
2003
operating performance
Gold
production was down at Renco due to lower throughput and poor head grades.
50 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Operating in Zimbabwe became much more of a challenge during 2003 with multiple factors affecting the operations, the most serious of which were acute food and fuel shortages, and the incidence of HIV. An uncertain fiscal exchange policy also created a very difficult operating environment.
DIAMOND
PROJECT
Murowa
(Rio
Tinto: 78 per cent)
Rio
Tinto and Rio Tinto Zimbabwe propose to approve expenditure of US$10 million
on a small scale plant to start diamond production at Murowa near Zvishavane
in southern Zimbabwe in 2004. An updated feasibility study confirmed the
existence of three kimberlite pipes representing a mining reserve of 18.7
million tonnes of ore at a grade of 0.9 carats per tonne.
Initial
operations will focus on 1.3 million tonnes of weathered material containing
140,000 tonnes of enriched ore which will be mined first. The small scale
approach reduces the initial investment required and will allow confirmation
of marketing and regulatory arrangements prior to expansion, which could be
considered within three years. Diamonds from Murowa will be marketed through
Rio Tinto Diamonds in Antwerp. Safeguards are in place regarding chain of
custody of the product. Zimbabwe is a signatory of the Kimberley Process.
The development affirms a long standing commitment to Zimbabwe and will make
a small contribution towards the economic development of the country.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 51 |
Operational review continued
Exploration
group
Rio
Tinto Exploration seeks to discover or identify mineral resources that
will contribute to the growth of the Rio Tinto Group. The discovery of
new resources is essential to replace deposits as they are mined and to
help meet the increasing global demand for minerals and metals.
The
Exploration group is opportunistic in approach and its resources are deployed
on projects that show the best chance of delivering a world class deposit
to Rio Tinto. Mineral exploration is a high risk activity. Rio Tintos
statistics show that an average of only one in 350 mineral prospects that
are drill tested result in a mine for the Group. Rio Tinto believes in having
a critical mass of projects, selected through a rigorous process of prioritisation.
The
Exploration group is organised into four geographically based teams and a
fifth team that looks for industrial minerals on a global basis. Additionally,
a small focused project generation team covers the world for new opportunities.
At
the end of 2003, Rio Tinto was exploring in 30 countries for a broad range
of commodities including copper, diamonds, nickel, industrial minerals, gold,
bauxite, iron ore and coal. Exploration employs 189 geologists and geophysicists
around the world and has a total staff of 670 people.
David
Klingner, head of Exploration, is based in London.
2003
operating performance
Exploration
in 2003 focused on advancing the most promising targets across the spectrum
of grassroots, generative, drill test stage, and near mine programmes. Good
results were obtained from a number of locations.
In
the US, a resource of greater than one billion tonnes of about 1.5 per cent
copper was outlined at the Resolution project in Arizona. The project was
turned over to the Copper group for further evaluation at the start of 2003.
Work
continued on the delineation of the sizeable body of gold mineralisation discovered
at Dashkasan, near Hamadan in Iran. Drilling continued to outline additional
resource and to increase confidence in existing resources. Metallurgical test
work continued and community and environmental baseline studies were initiated.
The
potential of the high grade haematite resources at Simandou in Guinea were
confirmed at more than one billion tonnes. A convention was signed with the
Government of Guinea, which covers the conditions attached to the future possible
development of the deposit. Environmental baseline studies continued in partnership
with Conservation International. An order of magnitude study will be completed
in 2004.
Closely
spaced drilling was undertaken at the La Sampala nickel laterite resource
in Indonesia to test continuity and confirm grade. Metallurgical work and
environmental and community baseline studies commenced
with
the intention of commencing an order of magnitude study in 2004.
Exploration
for nickel in the Upper Peninsular of Michigan in the US resulted in the discovery
of a small high grade nickel copper deposit at Eagle. A resource of five million
tonnes grading 3.6 per cent nickel, three per cent copper with platinum group
metal and gold credits is inferred. Studies are underway to assess mining
and processing options, environmental impacts and community benefits.
In
Mozambique, more detailed evaluation work in 2003 has led to a 30 per cent
increase in the resource base to some 160 million tonnes of ilmenite. The
deposits occur near to the coast, are amenable to conventional dredging methods
and have a low slimes content.
Although
extensions to the previously discovered gold mineralisation at Çöpler
in Turkey and to the copper mineralisation at Marcona in Peru were intersected,
neither resource is likely to meet Rio Tinto criteria for size and mine life.
Çöpler was divested and Marcona is for sale.
Diamond
exploration continued in Canada, southern Africa, Brazil and India. New diamond
bearing kimberlite pipes were discovered in a number of locations and follow
up test work is in progress to gauge economic potential.
Copper
exploration continued in Turkey, Peru, Chile, Argentina and the southwest
US. Significant copper mineralisation was encountered in drilling in projects
in Turkey, Peru and Argentina, which warrant further follow up drill testing.
The
Exploration group was active in the search for industrial mineral deposits
in various parts of the world including North and South America, Europe and
Turkey.
The
Exploration group continued to support brownfield work at a number of Rio
Tinto operations. Exploration in the vicinity of the Argyle diamond deposit
continued. In the US and Argentina, active programmes were conducted in the
orbit of the Boron and Tincalayu mines. In Indonesia, exploration in and around
the Grasberg mine led to the addition of further copper reserves.
Safety
performance declined in 2003, with 18 injuries compared with 15 in 2002. Lost
time injuries, however, decreased from six in 2002 to five in 2003. There
were no significant environmental or community incidents during 2003.
FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
2003
compared with 2002
Cash
expenditure on exploration in 2003 was US$130 million and the pre tax charge
to earnings was US$127 million, similar to the corresponding figures for
2002.
2002
compared with 2001
Cash
expenditure on exploration in 2002 was US$124 million and the pre tax charge
to earnings was US$130 million.
52 |
Rio
Tinto 2003 Annual
report and financial statements |
OTHER OPERATIONS
Kelian (Rio Tinto: 90 per cent)
Kelian
Equatorial Mining (Kelian) operates an open pit gold mine in East Kalimantan,
Indonesia. It is the largest of Rio Tintos
primary gold mines. Kelian is required to offer for sale up to 51 per cent of
its equity to Indonesian interests according to a specific schedule under the
terms of its Contract of Work with the Indonesian Government. Kelians offer
to sell 41 per cent in 2003 was again not taken up.
Mining at Kelian ceased in 2003 with production from stockpiled ore planned to be completed in early 2005. A mine closure consultative process was completed in 2003 with stakeholders agreeing on the key mine closure directions. Major decisions have been made regarding classification of the mining area as protected forest after closure, the upgrade of the Namuk Tailings dam, environmental criteria, alluvial mining to sterilise the future wetlands area and the use of site assets.
Kelian employs approximately 1,800 people including 45 expatriates and 1,300 contractors. A two year collective agreement, was renegotiated in July 2003 and will cover activities through to completion of operations.
2003 operating performance
Rio
Tintos
share of Kelians production was 422,000 ounces in 2003, 13 per cent below
2002 with lower grades more than offsetting the seven per cent increase in throughput.
Bougainville Copper
(Rio
Tinto: 53.6 per cent)
Bougainville Copper (BCL) is a Papua New Guinea company listed on the Australian Stock Exchange with a market capitalisation of A$96 million (US$72 million) at 31 December 2003.
Operations at BCLs
Panguna mine on Bougainville Island were suspended in 1989 following periods
of disruption resulting from civil unrest. At 31 December 1991, a full provision
of US$195 million was made in Rio Tintos financial statements for its
investment in BCL.
Peace has been restored on most of Bougainville Island. However, the mine site is still under the control of elements that deny access to the area. An agreement has been signed between the National Government and Bougainville leaders providing for increased autonomy for Bougainville.
Towards the end of 2000, two class
actions, since consolidated, were filed in the US District Court in
California claiming unspecified damages against Rio Tinto arising out of
the mining operation at Panguna and the civil unrest leading to and following
mine closure. The Court dismissed the claims. An appeal was heard during
2003 but the decision has been postponed until another case which does not
involve Rio Tinto, involving some common legal issues, is heard by the Supreme
Court.
The appeal decision is not expected before mid 2004. BCL is not a party to this action. Rio Tinto believes the claims are wholly without merit and the action is being contested vigorously.
The Papua New Guinea Internal Revenue Commission has issued assessments claiming additional tax and penalties of approximately US$10 million arising from an audit of BCLs
accounts covering the years 1990 to 2001. BCLs tax returns for those
and all other years were prepared on BCLs considered view of the appropriate
tax law. BCL believes its view is correct and has lodged objections to the
assessments.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 53 |
Operational review continued
Technology
group
The
Technology group provides technical assistance to Rio Tintos
product groups and their businesses, and advises executive management. In support
of the drive towards operational excellence a key focus is to identify and implement
best practices, to improve safety and environmental performance, maximise operating
efficiency and add value across Rio Tinto.
Technology staff includes experienced professionals covering all the main industry related disciplines, while the Office of the Chief Technologist manages the Groups
involvement in external and collaborative research.
The total staff in the Technology group at year end was 350 compared with some 260 in 2002. The increase was mainly to provide information technology (IT) services to Western Australia business units through Rio Tinto Shared Business Services and provided the basis for reduction of business unit IT staff.
John OReilly,
head of Technology, is based in London.
2003 operating performance
Technical Services
Technical
Services increased its involvement with Rio Tinto operations and also continued
to provide significant contributions at non managed operations. Activity over
the year was again at record levels, with Group wide initiatives launched in
2002, particularly water management, having increasing effect. An initiative
aimed at improving metallurgical performance is focussing initially on copper
ore processing operations.
With a number of projects in the commissioning phase and others under study that involve large scale underground mining, resources in this area have been strengthened, as has expertise in risk management.
A number of the current development projects are linked with external research programmes in order to leverage value for Rio Tinto. Others are focussed on innovation and best practice in key areas to add value in a shorter time frame.
Office of the Chief Technologist
The
Office of the Chief Technologist is responsible for the identification and the
transfer of technology based opportunities for the Group.
The external research portfolio continues to support a broad range of industry related initiatives. The project on in situ barrier technology
included some site trials during 2003 which gave encouraging results. Work
is continuing in areas such as the use of microwaves in ore comminution and
in bulk underground mining technologies.
The Rio Tinto Foundation for a
Sustainable
Minerals Industry approved 32 projects for funding.
Technical Evaluation and Project Management
Technical
Evaluation continued in its principal role of providing independent review of
all
major investment proposals being considered by the Group. The unit also continued
with the programme of post investment reviews, and has established a database
system to consolidate the findings so that lessons learned from completed projects
can be shared within the Group.
The Project Management unit provides ongoing support to major project teams across Rio Tinto, both for projects in execution and those still in the feasibility stage. There was also continued involvement with some major projects at non managed operations. In addition, the scope of the unit was expanded during the year to include the secondment of resources into project teams, earlier involvement in major project studies, and support to more modest capital projects of high value. A shared role with Technical Services during the year focused on improving the performance of current and future Rio Tinto underground bulk mining projects.
Asset Utilisation
This
unit is now well established and its workload continued to expand, adding value
across all product groups. Current areas of focus include process control, operational
readiness, warranty management, and the formulation and implementation of maintenance
standards and audits.
There is an emphasis on ensuring that safety, operability and maintainability issues are fully addressed and incorporated into any new designs or retrofits.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
The
charge for the Technology group against net earnings was US$16 million. The comparable
figure for 2002 was US$12 million. The increase was mainly due to the weaker
US dollar, sponsored research, and activities of the Foundation for a Sustainable
Minerals Industry.
OTHER OPERATIONS
Lihir (Rio Tinto: 14.5 per cent)
Lihir
Gold is a publicly quoted company formed to finance and develop the Lihir mine
in Papua New Guinea. Rio Tinto did not participate in an equity placement in
November in which 140 million shares were issued to raise US$150 million, resulting
in Rio Tintos
interest being reduced to 14.5 per cent from 16.3 per cent. Lihir Gold at
31
December 2003, had a market capitalisation of A$1.9 billion (US$1.4 million).
Lihir directly employs approximately 1,000 people, of whom 91 per cent are Papua New Guineans including 38 per cent Lihirians. Some 1,200 are also employed as contractors of whom a large proportion is Lihirian.
2003 operating performance
Gold
production at Lihir was nine per cent lower than in 2002 due to lower head grades
and below budget mine and plant performance.
54 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Society and
environment
Group employees
(average
for year)
Principal employee
locations 2003
The
way we work
Rio
Tinto is in business to create shareholder value by finding and developing world
class mineral deposits and operating and eventually closing the Groups
operations safely, responsibly and efficiently. To do so, the Group takes
a disciplined and integrated approach to the economic, social and environmental
aspects of all its activities.
The
approach is through implementation of the policies described in The
way we work the
Groups
statement of business practice, at all levels of the business.
The
statement, redistributed in 2003 in 18 languages, is the result of many
months wide internal and external consultation and discussion and represents
shared values from around the Group. The document was published initially
in January 1998 and revised in light of experience in 2002, following further
review and consultation, external benchmarking of policies against the
best practice of other organisations and approval by the Rio Tinto board.
The
way we work commits
the Group to transparency consistent with normal commercial confidentiality,
corporate
accountability
and the application of appropriate standards and internal controls. It sets
the basis for how Group employees work and also provides guidance for joint
venture partners and others. Every employee is responsible for implementing
the policies in the document.
Rio Tinto has adopted the Association of British Insurers 2003
disclosure guidelines on social responsibility in preparing this report.
Details of the Groups overall and individual businesses social
and environmental performance continue to be published on the Rio Tinto website:
www.riotinto.com
Board responsibilities
The
directors of Rio Tinto, and of Group companies, are responsible for monitoring
adherence to the Group policies outlined in
The way we work. Assurance for performance in these areas involves checking, reviewing and reporting each businesss
implementation of the policies, their compliance with regulations and voluntary
commitments, and the effectiveness of management and control systems, while also
providing mechanisms for improvement.
As discussed in the section on Corporate governance on page 70, the board established a process for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks faced by the Group. Directors meet regularly, have regular scheduled discussions on aspects of the Groups
strategy and full and timely access to the information required to discharge
their responsibilities fully and effectively.
Rio Tintos Compliance guidance requires that the identification of risk be systematic and ongoing. It recommends that each Group company should undertake a structured risk profiling exercise to identify, categorise and weigh the risks it faces in the conduct of its business unless its board is confident that all relevant and material risks have already been identified in a similar exercise. Each Group company should put systems in place to ensure that risks are reviewed at an appropriate frequency and that its board and management are made aware of changes in the risk profile.
Total remuneration is related to performance through the use of annual bonuses, long term incentives and stretching targets for personal, financial and safety performance. Environmental performance parameters are also included.
The boards Committee on social and environmental accountability reviews the effectiveness of policies and procedures. The committee comprises four non executive directors and is chaired by the chairman of the main board. It meets three times annually with the chief executive and heads of Technology, Health, Safety and Environment and Communication and Sustainable Development.
Reports for the committee summarise significant matters identified through
Rio Tintos assurance activities. These include reviews every four years of each business to identify and manage strategic risks in relation to health, safety, the environment and community; audits against Rio Tinto standards; annual risk management audits; risk reviews for specific concerns, such as cyanide management and smelter operations; procedures and systems for reporting critical and significant issues and incidents; completion of annual internal control questionnaires by all Group business unit leaders covering financial, social, health and safety and environment matters; and findings and recommendations of the independent external assurance and data verification programme.
Policies, programmes and performance
Implementation of the policies in The way we work is discussed in the following sections. Known risks arising from social and environmental matters and their management in Group businesses are described in the relevant Group operations section.
Safety
Safety
is a core value and a major priority. Rio Tinto believes that all injuries are
preventable and its goal is zero injuries. To achieve this, full and consistent
implementation of and accountability for Rio Tintos
comprehensive standards, guidelines, systems and procedures is required across
the world. The Group is also building a supportive safety culture that requires
visible leadership, ongoing education and training and a high level of participation
by everyone in the workplace.
However, there is still some way to go in achieving the goal. In 2003, regrettably, there were six deaths at Rio Tinto operations; three were Group employees and three were contractors. There were 468 lost time injuries during the year. This equates to a rate of 0.81 lost time injuries per 200,000 hours worked (2002: 0.85). Fines for infringement of safety and occupational health regulations involved 12 operations and totalled US$162,000 (2002: 12 operations and US$80,000). This includes a fine of $A206,250 paid by Northparkes in relation to an underground collapse that resulted in four fatalities in November 1999. This event occurred under the previous owner and prior to any Rio Tinto involvement in Northparkes.
Occupational health
Rio
Tinto strives to protect physical health and wellbeing in the workplace. This
requires clear standards, consistent implementation, transfer of best practice
and improvement through Group wide reporting and tracking of remedial actions.
During 2003, business units worked to implement the occupational health standards
and full implementation is targeted for the end of 2004.
Setting quantitative occupational health targets to drive performance improvement
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 55 |
Operational review continued
has also been a focus during 2003. Business units are developing and implementing action plans to achieve the targets, consistent with implementation of the standards.
In 2003, there were 341 new cases of occupational disease, equating to a rate of 107 new cases per 10,000 employees (2002: 120).
Environment
Wherever
possible, Rio Tinto prevents, or otherwise minimises, mitigates and remediates,
harmful effects of the Groups
operations on the environment.
To do this, the Group seeks to understand the environmental aspects and impacts of what it does, build what is learned into systems to manage and minimise those impacts, and set targets for improvement.
After significant Group wide consultation, Rio Tintos
environment standards were finalised and approved for implementation in 2003.
During the year significant work was undertaken to set five year targets
to improve efficiency of greenhouse gas emissions, energy use and water withdrawn
from the environment.
By the end of 2003, 80 per cent of operations had implemented ISO 14001 or an equivalent environmental management system ( EMS). All Rio Tinto operations are required to have a certified EMS by the end of June 2005: by the end of 2003, 64 per cent of operations had already achieved this.
Fines for infringement of environmental regulations involved four operations and totalled US$126,000 (2002: two operations and US$2,000). No environmental incidents were classified as critical in 2003.
Land
access
Rio
Tinto seeks to ensure the widest possible support for its proposals throughout
the life cycle of the Groups
activities by coordinating economic, technical, environmental and social factors
in an integrated process.
This involves negotiation of mining access agreements with indigenous landowners; responsible land management and rehabilitation; planning for closure; developing and implementing a biodiversity strategy; and forming strategic partnerships with external organisations.
Political
involvement
Rio
Tinto does not directly or indirectly participate in party politics nor make
payments to political parties or individual politicians.
A Business integrity guidance addressing bribery, corruption and political involvement was issued in 2003 to assist managers in implementing this policy. The guidance covers questions relating to compliance and implementation; gifts and entertainment; the use of agents and intermediaries; and facilitation payments.
Rio Tinto avoids making facilitation payments anywhere in the world. Bribery in any form is prohibited. Gifts and
entertainment are only offered or accepted for conventional social and business purposes and then only at a level appropriate to the circumstances.
Communities
Rio
Tinto sets out to build enduring relationships with neighbours. This is characterised
by mutual respect, active partnership, and long term commitment.
Every business unit is required to have rolling five year community plans which are updated annually. In 2003, the Group completed a series of pilot studies aimed at achieving a deeper level of understanding of the linkages between mining activities and the economies in which they take place.
All business units produce their own social and environment reports for local communities, and community assurance of the quality and content of these reports is increasing. This provides an opportunity for engagement with the community on their views of programmes sponsored by Group operations.
Business units managed by Rio Tinto contributed US$70 million to community programmes in 2003 (2002: US$48 million). Part of the increase from 2002 (about US$7 million) was due to exchange rate movements against the US dollar. Of the total contributions, US$21 million were direct payments made under legislation or an agreement with a local community.
Human
rights
Rio
Tinto supports human rights consistent with the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and Rio Tinto respects those rights in conducting the Groups
operations throughout the world.
Rio Tinto also supports the UN Secretary Generals
Global Compact, the US/UK Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights
and the Global Sullivan Principles.
The Groups Human rights guidance is designed to assist managers in implementing the human rights policy in complex local situations. It was revised and republished in 2003 and a case study was provided to the Global Compact on how the guidance was developed and promoted around the Group.
Employment
Rio
Tinto requires safe and effective working relationships at all levels. Whilst
respecting different cultures, traditions and employment practices, common goals
are shared, in particular the elimination of workplace injuries, and commitment
to good corporate values and ethical behaviour.
In 2003, Group companies employed 29,000 people (2002: 29,000) and together with Rio Tintos
proportionate share of those employed by joint ventures and associates, the
total was 36,000 (2002: 37,000).
Australia
and New Zealand (10,000), North America (10,000) and Africa (6,000) remained
the principal locations.
Wages
and salaries paid in 2003 totalled
US$1.5 billion (2002: US$1.3 billion). Retirement payments and benefits to dependants are provided in accordance with local conditions and good practice. The total pension and other benefits paid in 2003 was US$278 million (2002: US$211 million).
Sustainable development
Rio
Tinto believes that its businesses, projects, operations and products should
contribute constructively to the global transition to sustainable development.
All businesses are required to assess the sustainable development case for their activities. Rio Tinto has committed itself to integrating the results of the Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (MMSD) analysis of 2002 into the Groups
policy and objectives, and developing measures to assess their implementation.
As a founding member of the International Council on Mining and Metals, Rio
Tinto is participating in dialogue and programmes to advance industry wide
progress on key sustainable development priorities.
Openness and accountability
Rio
Tinto conducts its affairs in an accountable and transparent manner, reflecting
the interests of Rio Tinto shareholders, employees, host communities and customers
as well as others affected by the Groups
activities.
Policies on transparency, business integrity, corporate governance and internal controls and reporting procedures are outlined in The way we work. In 2003, a Compliance guidance was issued to provide a framework to enable each Group business to implement and maintain a best practice compliance programme which should identify and manage risks associated with non compliance with laws, regulations, codes, standards and Rio Tinto policies.
Assurance and verification
To
be accountable and transparent, assurance is provided to
the Group and others that Rio Tinto policies are being implemented fully
and consistently across our businesses and operations.
The overall objective of external assurance and data verification is to provide assurance that the material in the Social and environment review is relevant, complete and accurate and, in particular, that Rio Tintos
policies and programmes are reflected in implementation activities at operations.
In 2003, Environmental Resources Management (ERM) undertook the external
assurance and data verification programme and the results are available in
the Social and environment review.
56 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Executive committee members
01 Tom
Albanese (age 46)
Mr
Albanese joined Rio Tinto in 1993 on Rio Tintos
acquisition of Nerco. He holds a BS in mineral economics and an MS in mining
engineering. He held a series of management positions before being appointed
chief executive of the Industrial Minerals group in 2000.
02
Preston Chiaro (age
50)
Mr Chiaro was appointed chief executive of the Energy group in September
2003. He is an environmental engineer with Bachelor of Science, Environmental
Engineering and Master of Engineering degrees. He joined the Group in 1991
at Kennecott Utah Coppers
Bingham Canyon mine as vice president, technical services. In 1995 he became
vice president and general manager of Boron operations in California. He was
chief executive of Rio Tinto Borax from 1999 to 2003.
03
Keith Johnson (age
42)
Mr Johnson was appointed Group executive diamonds in 2003. He holds degrees
in mathematics and management and is a fellow of the Royal Statistical Society.
He joined Rio Tinto in 1991 and has held a series of management positions,
most recently as managing director of Comalco Mining and Refining.
04 David Klingner (age 59)
Dr
Klingner became head of Exploration in 1997. He joined the Group as a geologist
in 1966 and has had a wide variety of roles both in exploration and elsewhere
during his 38 years service,
including managing director of Kaltim Prima Coal. Later he was a Group executive
with Rio Tinto Limited, responsible for coal and gold businesses located in Australia,
Indonesia and Papua New Guinea.
05 Karen McLeod (age 57)
Ms McLeod was appointed head of Human Resources for Rio Tinto in 1999. She joined
the Group in 1974 at Comalco, working in Aboriginal affairs. She holds degrees
in the social sciences and business management and has held senior positions
in human resources, business analysis, marketing and organisation development.
06
John
OReilly (age 58)
Mr
OReilly
joined Rio Tinto in 1987, following 20 years operations experience in Africa
and the Middle East. A metallurgical engineer by profession, he has held a series
of management positions, including director of Rio Tinto Technical Services,
chief executive officer, Lihir Gold, and head of the former Gold & Other
Minerals group, before being appointed head of Technology in 1999.
07 Christopher Renwick (age 61) Mr Renwick has been with Rio Tinto for 34 years and is currently chief executive of the Iron Ore group. He is a lawyer and has held several management positions within the Group, including commercial director of Hamersley Iron, managing director of Comalco Minerals and Alumina and a Group executive with Rio Tinto Limited. He was appointed to his current position in 1997.
08
Andrew Vickerman (age
49)
Mr Vickerman, previously head of External Affairs, became head of Communication
and Sustainable Development in January 2003, with responsibility for both
External Affairs and HSE. Prior to 1998 he was a director of Lihir Gold and
was responsible for the financial and administrative aspects of the company.
He has a BA, MA and PhD from Cambridge University. He joined Rio Tinto in
1991.
09 Sam Walsh (age 54)
Mr Walsh was appointed chief executive of the Aluminium group in 2001. He
holds a commerce degree and joined Rio Tinto in 1991, following 20 years
working in the automotive industry. He has held a number of management positions
within the Group, including managing director of Comalco Foundry Products,
CRA Industrial Products, Hamersley Sales and Marketing, Hamersley Operations
and vice president of Rio Tinto Iron Ore.
Brian Horwood will retire from the position of managing director of Rio Tinto Australia in early March 2004 after 34 years with the Group. He is succeeded by Charlie Lenegan, previously president director of PT Kelian Equatorial Mining, who joined the Group in 1981.
Employees
Information
on the Groups
employees including their costs, is on pages 56, 90, 117 and 133.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 57 |
Chairman | Non executive directors |
01 Paul Skinner (age 59)
Mr Skinner was appointed chairman in November 2003. A director of Rio Tinto since 2001, he is chairman of the Nominations committee and the Committee on social and environmental accountability. He was previously a Managing Director of The Shell Transport
and Trading Company plc and Group Managing Director of The Royal Dutch/Shell
Group of Companies, for whom he had worked since 1966. He is a director of Standard
Chartered PLC and a member of the board of INSEAD business school. (notes b and
d)
06
Sir Richard Giordano (age
69)
Sir Richard is the senior non executive director and a deputy chairman. He
is also chairman of the Audit
committee.
He has been a director of Rio Tinto plc since 1992 and of Rio Tinto Limited
since 1995. A lawyer by training, he spent 12 years at BOC Group, first as
chief executive, then chairman. In 1993, Sir Richard became a director of
British Gas, assuming the role of chairman in 1994. A former chairman of BG
Group plc, he is a director of Georgia Pacific Corporation in the US and a
trustee of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (notes a, b, and d)
08
Sir David Clementi (age
55)
Sir David was appointed a director of Rio Tinto in January 2003. He is chairman
of Prudential plc, and prior to that appointment was deputy governor of the
Bank of England. Sir Davids
earlier career was with Kleinwort Benson where he spent 22 years, holding
various positions including chief executive and vice chairman. A
graduate of Oxford University and a qualified chartered accountant, Sir David
also holds an MBA from Harvard Business School. (notes a and c)
Executive directors | ||||
also executive committee members |
02 Leigh Clifford (age 56)
Mr
Clifford became chief executive in 2000, having been a director of Rio Tinto
plc since 1994 and Rio Tinto Limited since 1995. A mining engineer, he has
held various roles in the Groups
coal and metalliferous operations since joining in 1970, including managing
director of Rio Tinto Limited and chief executive of the Energy group.
Mr
Clifford is also a director of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
03 Robert Adams (age 58)
Mr Adams was appointed a director of Rio Tinto plc in 1991 with responsibility
for planning and development, and a director of Rio Tinto Limited
in 1995.
He joined the Group in 1970 after reading natural sciences and economics
and subsequently gaining an MSc from the London Business School. Mr
Adams is a
non executive director of Foreign & Colonial Investment Trust plc.
04 Guy Elliott (age 48)
Mr
Elliott became finance director of Rio Tinto in 2002. He joined the Group in
1980 after gaining an MBA from INSEAD business school. He has subsequently held
a variety of marketing, planning and development positions, most recently as
head of Business Evaluation. From 1996 to 1999 he was president of Rio Tinto
Brasil.
05 Oscar Groeneveld (age
50)
Mr Groeneveld became a director of Rio Tinto in 1998. A mining engineer with
qualifications in engineering, science and management, he joined the Group in
1975 and has since held a series of management positions, including head of Technology,
before being appointed chief executive of the Copper group in 1999. Mr Groeneveld
is also a director of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
07 Leon Davis (age 64)
Mr
Davis is the Groups
Australia based non executive deputy chairman. He became a director of Rio Tinto
Limited in 1994 and of Rio Tinto plc in 1995. He is a metallurgist and during
more than 40 years with the Group has held a number of managerial posts around
the world, ultimately as chief executive from 1997 to 2000. He is chairman of
Westpac Banking Corporation and a director of Codan Limited, Huysmans Pty Limited
and Trouin Pty Limited, and is also president of the board of The Walter and
Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research. (note d)
09 Andrew Gould (age
57)
Mr Gould was appointed a director of Rio Tinto in December 2002. He is chairman
and chief executive officer of Schlumberger Limited. Prior to this appointment,
Mr Gould, who joined Schlumberger in 1975 from Ernst & Young, has held a
succession of financial and operational management positions within the Schlumberger
group, including that of executive vice president of Schlumberger Oilfield Services
and president and chief operating officer of Schlumberger Limited. (notes a and
c)
58 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Company secretaries |
|
10 Sir
John Kerr (age
62)
Sir John was appointed a director of Rio Tinto
in October 2003. He was a member of the UK Diplomatic Service for 36 years,
and its head from 1997 to 2002. During his career he was seconded to the UK
Treasury where he was principal private secretary to two Chancellors of the
Exchequer. His service abroad included spells as ambassador to the European
Union from 1990 to 1995, and to the US from 1995 to 1997. He is also a director
of The Shell Transport and Trading Company plc and Scottish American
Investment Trust plc.
12
John Morschel (age 60)
Mr Morschel was appointed to the boards of Rio Tinto in 1998. Educated in
Australia and the US, he spent most of his career with Lend Lease Corporation
Limited in Australia, culminating as managing director, followed by two years
as an executive director of the Westpac Banking Corporation. He is chairman
of Leighton Holdings Limited, and of Rinker Group Limited and is a director
of Tenix Pty Limited, Gifford Communications Pty Limited and Singapore Telecommunications
Limited. He is also a patron of the Property Industry Foundation. (notes b,
c and d)
14 Lord
Tugendhat (age 67)
Lord Tugendhat, who became a director of Rio
Tinto in 1997 will retire from the boards at the conclusion of the 2004 annual
general meetings. A former vice president of the Commission of the European
Communities, and chairman of the Civil Aviation Authority, he was chairman
of Abbey National plc from 1991 to 2002 when he was appointed chairman of
Lehman Brothers Europe Limited. (notes a and d)
15 Anette
Lawless (age 47)
Mrs Lawless joined Rio Tinto in 1998 and became
company secretary of Rio Tinto plc in 2000. A chartered secretary and a
fellow
of the ICSA, she also holds an MA from the Copenhagen Business School.
11 David
Mayhew (age 63)
Mr Mayhew was appointed a director of Rio Tinto
in 2000. He is chairman of Cazenove Group plc, which he joined in 1969. Cazenove
is a stockbroker to Rio Tinto plc. (notes a and b)
13
Sir Richard Sykes (age
61)
Sir Richard was appointed to the boards of Rio Tinto in 1997. He is chairman
of the Remuneration committee. After reading microbiology, he obtained
doctorates in microbial chemistry and in science. A former chairman of GlaxoSmithKline
plc, Sir Richard is a director of Lonza Group Limited and is rector of the
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine. He is a fellow of the
Royal Society and a trustee of the Natural History Museum in London and of
the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew. (note c)
Sir Robert Wilson served as chairman until his retirement on 31 October 2003.
Jonathan Leslie
and
The Hon. Raymond Seitz served
as directors until 31 March 2003 and 1 May 2003 respectively.
Notes | |
a) | Audit committee |
b) | Nominations committee |
c) | Remuneration committee |
d) | Committee on social and environmental accountability |
16
Stephen Consedine (age 42)
Mr Consedine joined
Rio Tinto in 1983 and became company secretary of Rio Tinto Limited in 2002.
He holds a Bachelor
of Business and is a Certified Practising Accountant.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 59 |
Directors report for the year ended 31 December 2003
Dual
listed companies
Rio
Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited were unified under a dual listed companies
structure in 1995, and the Directors report has been prepared as a joint
report of both Companies and their respective subsidiaries. For a full description
of the structure, please see page 77 to 79.
Activities
and review of operations
A
detailed review of the Groups operations, results from those operations
and principal activities during 2003, details of any significant changes in
the Groups state of affairs during the year, post balance sheet events
and likely future developments are given in the Chairmans letter on
page 2 and the Chief executives report on pages 3 to 5 and the Operational
review on pages 37 to 56.
No
matter or circumstance has arisen since the end of the 2003 financial year
that has significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations,
the results of the operations or state of affairs of the Group in future financial
years.
In
accordance with section 299(3) of the Australian Corporations Act, further
information regarding likely future developments in, and the expected results
of, the operations of the Group have not been included.
Corporate
governance
A
report on corporate governance and compliance with the Combined Code appended
to The Listing Rules of the UK Financial Services Authority, as well as the
best practice guidelines of the Australian Stock Exchange, is set out on pages
70 to 72.
Directors
Details
of each person who was a director at any time during or since the end of the
year and their qualifications, experience and responsibilities are set out
on pages 58 and 59.
Sir
Robert Wilson retired on 31 October 2003 with Paul Skinner succeeding him
as chairman on 1 November 2003.
Jonathan
Leslie resigned with effect from 31 March 2003 and The Hon. Raymond Seitz
retired with effect from the conclusion of the Rio Tinto Limited annual general
meeting held on 1 May 2003.
Sir
John Kerr was appointed a non executive director on 14 October 2003. Sir John,
who does not have a service contract, will retire and offers himself for election
at the 2004 annual general meetings.
Under
the articles of association of Rio Tinto plc and the Rio Tinto Limited constitution,
directors are required to retire from the board and offer themselves for re-election
at least every three years.
The
following directors retire by rotation and being eligible, offer themselves
for re-election: Leigh Clifford and Guy Elliott, who each have a service contract
with Rio Tinto Limited and a subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc respectively which
are terminable on one years
notice by either party, and Sir Richard
Sykes,
who does not have a service contract. Lord Tugendhat also retires by rotation,
but does not offer himself for re-election. In addition, Sir Richard Giordano
will have attained the age of 70 before the annual general meetings and in
accordance with the Companies Act 1985, retires and offers himself for re-election
at the annual general meetings. Special notice has been received by the Group
of the intention to propose his re-election at the Rio Tinto plc annual general
meeting.
The
beneficial interests of the directors and their families in shares and other
securities of Group companies are shown on pages 66 and 67.
The
table on page 61 shows the number of meetings of the board and its committees
held during the 2003 financial year, as well as each directors
attendance at those meetings.
A
statement on the directors independence
is set out on page 70.
Dividends
Details
of dividends are set out on page 74.
Share
capital
There
were no changes to the authorised share capital of Rio Tinto plc during the
year. Details of the changes to the issued share capital of both Companies,
the number of shares reserved for issue and the number of options outstanding
at the year end, are given in note 24 to the Financial statements.
Since
the year end, 689,976 Rio Tinto plc shares and 1,736 Rio Tinto Limited shares
have been issued as a result of the exercise of employee options. As at 6
February 2004, there were 9,110,266 options outstanding over Rio Tinto plc
ordinary shares and 5,976,777 options outstanding over Rio Tinto Limited shares
in connection with employee share plans.
At
the annual general meeting of Rio Tinto plc held in April 2003, the authorities
for Rio Tinto plc to buy its own shares and for Rio Tinto Limited to buy shares
in Rio Tinto plc were renewed and extended until October 2004. These authorities
enable Rio Tinto plc to buy back up to ten per cent of its publicly held shares
in any 12 month period. Under the Australian Corporations Act 2001, Rio Tinto
Limited is currently permitted to buy back up to ten per cent of its shares
on market in any 12 month period without seeking shareholder approval. However,
at its annual general meeting held in May 2003 Rio Tinto Limited renewed shareholder
approvals to buy back up to all the Rio Tinto Limited shares held by Tinto
Holdings Australia Pty Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc)
plus up to ten per cent of the publicly held share capital in any 12 month
period on market. During 2003, neither Company purchased shares under the
relevant authorities given to them.
Remuneration
of directors and executives
A
discussion of the Groups policy for determining the nature and amount
of remuneration of directors and senior
executives,
and of the relationship between that policy and the Groups performance
appears in the Remuneration report on pages 62 to 69.
The
Remuneration report includes details of the nature and amount of each element
of the remuneration of each director and of the five executives of the Group
receiving the highest remuneration.
Environmental
regulation
Details
of the Groups environmental performance are set out on pages 55 and
56.
Indemnities
and insurance
Under
the Rio Tinto plc articles of association and the Rio Tinto Limited constitution,
each Company is required to indemnify each officer of the respective Company
and each officer of each wholly-owned subsidiary, to the extent permitted
by law, against liability incurred in, or arising out of the conduct of the
business of the company or the discharge of the duties of the officer.
During
2003, the Group paid premiums for directors
and officers insurance. The policy indemnifies all directors and some
Group employees against certain liabilities they may incur in carrying out
their duties for the Group.
The
directors have not included details of the nature and of the liabilities covered
or the amount of the premium paid in respect of directors
and officers insurance as, in accordance with commercial practice,
such disclosure is prohibited under the policy.
Employment
policies
Group
companies, together with the Groups share of joint ventures and associates,
employed approximately 36,000 (2002: 37,000) people worldwide, with around
10,000 in Australia and New Zealand and 1,000 in the United Kingdom. Rio Tintos
employment policy is set out in the statement of business practice, The
way we work.
Rio Tinto is committed to equality of opportunity and encourages each operating
company to develop its own policies and practices to suit individual circumstances.
Management development and succession planning are regularly reviewed.
Group
companies employ disabled people and accept the need to maintain and develop
careers for them. If an employee becomes disabled whilst in employment and,
as a result, is unable to perform his or her duties, every effort is made
to offer suitable alternative employment and to assist with retraining.
Rio
Tinto respects the right of employees worldwide to choose for themselves whether
or not they wish to be represented collectively.
Group
companies recognise their obligations to comply with health and safety legislation
and, through training and communication, encourage employee awareness of the
need to create and secure a safe and healthy working environment. For further
information about Group staff and health and safety initiatives, please see
pages 55 and 56.
60 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Retirement payments and benefits to dependants are provided by Rio Tinto and its major subsidiaries in accordance with local conditions and practice in the countries concerned.
Policy
regarding payment of trade creditors
It
is the policy of both Companies to abide by terms of payment agreed with suppliers.
In many cases, the terms of payment are as stated in the suppliers own
literature. In other cases, the terms of payment are determined by specific
written or oral agreement. Neither Company follows any published code or standard
on payment practice.
At
31 December 2003, there were 20 days
purchases outstanding in respect of Rio Tinto Limited costs and 15 days purchases
outstanding in respect of Rio Tinto plc costs, based on the total invoiced
by suppliers during the year.
Donations
Worldwide
expenditure on community programmes by Rio Tinto managed businesses amounted
to US$70 million (2002: US$48 million).
Donations
in the UK during 2003 amounted to £3.6 million of which £0.4 million
was for charitable purposes as defined by the Companies Act 1985 and £3.2
million for other community purposes. As in previous years, no donations
were
made in the EU or elsewhere during 2003 for political purposes as defined
by the UK Companies Act 1985 as amended by the Political Parties, Elections
and Referendums Act 2000.
Total
community spending in Australia amounted to A$56.5 million. Again, no donations
were made for political purposes.
Value
of land
Group
companies interests in land consist mainly of leases and other rights
which permit the working of such land and the erection of buildings and equipment
thereon for the purpose of extracting and treating minerals. Such land is
mainly carried in the financial statements at cost. It is not practicable
to estimate the market value since this depends on product prices over the
next 20 years or longer, which will vary with market conditions.
Exploration,
research and development
Companies
within the Group carry out exploration, research and development necessary
to support their activities. Grants are also made to universities and other
institutions which undertake research on subjects relevant to the activities
of Group companies. A description of some aspects of the work currently being
undertaken and expenditure involved is provided in the Operational review.
Cash expenditure during the year was US$130 million for exploration and evaluation
and US$23 million for research and development.
Auditors
Following
the conversion of the UK firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers to a Limited Liability
Partnership (LLP) from 1 January 2003, PricewaterhouseCoopers resigned as
auditor of Rio Tinto plc on 27 January 2003 and the directors appointed its
successor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as auditor. A resolution to re-appoint
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor of Rio Tinto plc was passed at the 2003
annual general meetings of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited. The Australian
arm of PricewaterhouseCoopers continued in office as auditor of Rio Tinto
Limited.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP have indicated their willingness to continue in office as auditor of Rio Tinto plc. A resolution to re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor of Rio Tinto plc will be proposed at the 2004 annual general meetings. PricewaterhouseCoopers will continue in office as auditor of Rio Tinto Limited.
Annual
general meetings
The
notices of the 2004 annual general meetings are set out in separate letters
to shareholders of each Company. At the Rio Tinto plc annual general meeting
these include a resolution for the renewal of the authority for Rio Tinto
plc and Rio Tinto Limited to purchase Rio Tinto plc shares and for the approval
of the Mining Companies Comparative Plan and the Share Option Plan. At the
Rio Tinto Limited annual general meeting resolutions include the renewal of
the authorities for Rio Tinto Limited to buy back its shares, the approval
of the Mining Companies Comparative Plan and the Share Option Plan, and the
approval of share awards and share option grants to certain executive directors.
Income
and Corporation Taxes Act 1988
The
close company provisions of the UK Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 do
not apply to Rio Tinto plc.
The
Directors report is made in accordance with a resolution of the board.
Paul Skinner | Leigh Clifford |
Chairman 20 February 2004 |
Chief
executive 20 February 2004 |
Guy Elliott | |
Finance
director 20 February 2004 |
Directors attendance at board and committee meetings during 2003
Board |
Audit committee | Remuneration committee | Committee on social | Nominations committee | ||||||||||||||||
and environmental | ||||||||||||||||||||
accountability | ||||||||||||||||||||
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
|||||||||||
Robert Adams | 8 |
8 |
||||||||||||||||||
Sir David Clementi1 | 7 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
||||||||||||||
Leigh Clifford | 8 |
8 |
||||||||||||||||||
Leon Davis | 8 |
8 |
3 |
3 |
||||||||||||||||
Guy Elliott | 8 |
8 |
||||||||||||||||||
Sir Richard Giordano | 8 |
7 |
8 |
8 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
||||||||||||
Andrew Gould | 8 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
||||||||||||||
Oscar Groeneveld | 8 |
8 |
||||||||||||||||||
Sir John Kerr2 | 1 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan Leslie3 | 2 |
2 |
||||||||||||||||||
David Mayhew | 8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
||||||||||||||
John Morschel | 8 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
||||||||||||
The Hon. Raymond Seitz4 | 4 |
3 |
1 |
|
||||||||||||||||
Paul Skinner | 8 |
8 |
7 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
||||||||||||
Sir Richard Sykes | 8 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
||||||||||||||||
Lord Tugendhat | 8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
3 |
3 |
||||||||||||||
Sir Robert Wilson5 | 7 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
||||||||||||||||
A = | Maximum number of meetings the director could have attended |
B = | Number of meetings attended |
1 | Sir David Clementi was appointed on 28 January 2003 |
2 | Sir John Kerr was appointed on 14 October 2003 |
3 | Jonathan Leslie resigned on 31 March 2003 |
4 | The Hon. Raymond Seitz retired on 1 May 2003 |
5 | Sir Robert Wilson retired on 31 October 2003 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 61 |
Remuneration report
Remuneration
committee The Remuneration committee is appointed by the board and all its members are independent. They are Sir Richard Sykes (chairman), Sir David Clementi, Andrew Gould and John Morschel. The committee met five times during 2003. Members attendance is set out on page 61. The committees responsibilities include: |
|
• | recommending remuneration policy relating to executive directors and product group chief executives to the board; |
• | reviewing and determining the remuneration of executive directors, product group chief executives and the company secretary of Rio Tinto plc; and |
• | reviewing and agreeing managements strategy for remuneration and conditions of employment for senior managers. |
The
committee may invite non committee members to attend meetings in an advisory
capacity as appropriate. Executives are not present at meetings when their
own remuneration is discussed.
During 2003, Paul Skinner, the present chairman, attended three meetings of the committee as an observer and adviser. The then chairman of the Group, Sir Robert Wilson, the chief executive, Leigh Clifford, and the Group adviser, remuneration, Jeffery Kortum also attended meetings in an advisory capacity. Anette Lawless, the company secretary of Rio Tinto plc, acts as secretary to the committee.
The committee obtained advice from Kepler Associates, an independent consultancy with no other links to the Group.
The
committee monitors global remuneration trends and developments in order to
fulfil the functions set out in its terms of reference and draws on a range
of external sources of data, including publications by remuneration consultants
Towers Perrin, Hewitt Associates, Hay Group, Watson Wyatt and Monks Partnership.
The
Groups Remuneration report for 2002 was approved by shareholders
at the 2003 annual general meetings.
Towards
the end of 2002, the committee decided that it would undertake a detailed
review of the design of the Groups executive remuneration programme
during 2003 to ensure it complies with contemporary best practice. Consequently,
shareholders will be asked to consider and approve new share based incentive
plans at the 2004 annual general meetings.
Corporate governance
At its meeting
in December 2003, the committee reviewed its terms of reference in the light
of the publication in the UK of the new Combined Code (the new Code) and the
ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines. Although the new Code was
not in force during 2003, the committee nevertheless concluded that, in the course
of its business, it had covered the main duties
as set out in the Higgs guidance, and was constituted in accordance with the requirements of the new Code. Both Companies comply with the remuneration guidelines in Principle 9 of the ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Remuneration
policy Achieving the Groups business objectives is to a large extent dependent on the quality, application and commitment of its people. Rio Tinto competes for a limited resource of talented, internationally mobile managers. The Groups executive remuneration policy is therefore designed to support its business goals by enabling it to attract, retain and appropriately reward executives of the calibre necessary to consistently achieve very high levels of performance. Specifically, Rio Tintos executive remuneration policy is based upon the following principles: |
|
• | to provide total remuneration which is competitive in structure and quantum with comparator company practice in the regions and markets within which the Group operates; |
• | to achieve clear alignment between total remuneration and delivered personal and business performance, including shareholder value creation; |
• | to tie variable elements of remuneration to the achievement of challenging performance criteria that are consistent with the best interests of the Group and shareholders over the short, medium and long term; |
• | to provide an appropriate balance of fixed and variable remuneration; and |
• | to
provide appropriate relativities between executives globally and to support
executive placements to meet the needs of the Group. |
The Remuneration
committee monitors
the effectiveness and appropriateness of executive remuneration policy
and practice. During the past year, the committee, assisted by Kepler Associates, reviewed the executive incentive plans to ensure that they: |
|
• | reflect best practice while meeting Rio Tintos business needs; |
• | further strengthen the alignment between executive remuneration and delivery of value to shareholders; and |
• | continue to enable the Group to attract, motivate and retain key talent. |
Following this review it is proposed that new plans be introduced in 2004. They are outlined on pages 63 and 64 of this report as well as in the notices of the 2004 annual general meetings.
The new plans will maintain the expected value of the total remuneration for executive directors and product group chief executives at approximately their current levels.
Executive
directors remuneration Total remuneration for Rio Tinto executive directors and product group chief executives comprises: |
||
• | base salary | |
• | short term incentive plan (STIP) | |
• | long term incentives | |
| share option plan (SOP) | |
| performance shares (MCCP) | |
| other share plans | |
• | Pension/superannuation | |
• | Other benefits. |
The
short term and long term incentive plans are variable components of the
total remuneration package
as they are tied to achievement of specific measures of personal and/or business
performance and are therefore at risk. The other components of the package are
referred to as fixed as they are not at risk, although some, eg base
salary, are also related to performance.
The
composition of the total remuneration package is designed to provide an
appropriate balance between the fixed and variable components, in line
with Rio Tintos policy objective of aligning total remuneration with
delivered personal and business performance.
Excluding allowances and pension or superannuation arrangements, the proportion of total direct remuneration provided by way of variable components (annual short term incentive, SOP and MCCP), assuming target levels of performance, is currently approximately 68 per cent for the chief executive and 62 per cent for the other executive directors.
Base salary
Base salary for executive directors and product group chief executives is set at a level consistent with market practice for companies with a similar geographical spread and complexity of businesses. Base salaries are reviewed annually by the Remuneration committee, taking account of the nature of the role, external market trends and personal and business performance.
Short
term incentive plan (STIP) STIP provides a cash bonus opportunity for participants and is designed to support overall remuneration policy by: |
|
• | focusing participants on achieving goals which contribute to sustainable shareholder value, and |
• | providing significant bonus differential based on delivered performance against challenging personal, business, and other targets, including safety. |
Performance targets for executive directors and product group chief executives are approved by the Remuneration committee. The target level of bonus for these participants for 2004 is 60 per cent of salary, (the same as 2003), with bonus potential capped at 120 per cent of salary. The format
62 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
for the STIP award calculation for 2004 and future years has been varied from that applying previously to provide greater performance related variation above and below target. The award cap was previously 100 per cent of salary. Awards above this level are expected to be rare and will only be achieved with outstanding performance against all personal and business performance criteria.
Awards in respect of 2003, payable in 2004, are included as annual bonus in Tables 1 and 6 on page 65 and 69.
Long term incentives
As indicated elsewhere in this report, the
Remuneration committee reviewed the Rio Tinto long term incentive plans during 2003 and the plans outlined below are proposed for introduction in 2004.
The proposed plans aim to enhance the alignment of the interests of the executive directors and other senior executives with those of the shareholders, by linking rewards to Group performance. The proposed plans will maintain the expected value of total remuneration for executive directors and product group chief executives at approximately their current levels.
A
key feature of the proposals for Rio Tintos long term incentive
plan arrangements for 2004 and beyond involves a change in the relative
proportions
in which share options and performance shares are provided. Performance
shares will become the primary long term incentive vehicle whereas previously,
the executive remuneration package has been heavily biased towards share
options.
Share
Option Plan (SOP) An annual grant of options to purchase shares in the future at current market prices is made to executive directors and eligible senior executives. The committee decides the level of grants each year, taking into consideration local market practice and personal performance. The exercise of options is conditional on the Group meeting stretching performance conditions set by the committee. For grants made prior to 2004: |
|
• | Two thirds of options vest when the Groups adjusted earnings per share (EPS) growth for a three year performance period is at least nine percentage points higher than US inflation over the same period, as measured by the US Consumer Price Index. |
• | The balance of the grant vests when growth of at least 12 percentage points above US inflation has been achieved. |
• | Rio Tinto performance is tested against the performance condition after three years. |
• | There is an annual retest on a three year rolling basis until options fully vest or lapse at the end of the option period. |
The choice of the US Consumer Price Index as a measure of performance was consistent with the presentation of financial data in US dollars and reflected the importance of the US economy to the Group.
Subject
to shareholder approval at the 2004 annual general meetings, vesting of
options granted under the new SOP in 2004 and in subsequent years will
be subject to Rio Tintos three year Total Shareholder Return (TSR) equalling or outperforming the HSBC Global Mining Index. If Rio Tintos three year TSR performance equals the index, then the higher of one third of the original grant or 20,000 options will vest (subject to the actual grant level not being exceeded). The full grant vests if Rio Tintos
three year TSR performance is equal to or greater than the HSBC Global
Mining Index plus five per cent per annum. Vesting is based on a sliding
scale between these points and there is zero vesting for three year TSR
performance less than the index.
The
committee proposes changing from the EPS performance measure that applied
previously, to the new relative TSR condition as it considers that relative
TSR provides better alignment with shareholder interests and reflects Rio
Tintos performance relative to comparator companies across the resources
sector.
The
committee also proposes to reduce the number of retests available under
the SOP from seven rolling retests to a single fixed base retest five years
after grant. Although the committee understands the preference of investors
to eliminate retesting altogether, the committee feels it is important
to maintain a single retest at this time. Due to the cyclical nature of
our industry and our focus on long term decision making, the committee
believes a five year retest will help extend participants time horizons
and strengthen retention. Additionally, we operate in a sector where the
reliance of certain competitors on a single commodity means that price
swings can have effects on relative TSR unrelated to management performance.
However, the committee acknowledges the changing practice regarding retesting
and has determined that options granted after
31 December
2006 will not be subject to retest and will therefore lapse if they do not vest
at the conclusion of the three year performance period.
Prior
to any options being released to participants for exercise, the Groups
performance against the criteria relevant to the SOP is examined and verified
by the external auditors.
The Remuneration committee retains discretion in satisfying itself that the TSR performance is a genuine reflection of underlying financial performance.
The maximum grant size under the SOP will be reduced from five times salary to three times salary for 2004 and future years, calculated as the average share price over the previous financial year.
Share options granted to directors are included in Table 5 on page 68.
Mining Companies Comparative Plan (MCCP)
Under this
plan, a conditional right to receive shares is granted annually to participants.
These conditional awards only vest if performance conditions approved by the
committee are satisfied. Awards are not pensionable.
The
performance condition compares Rio Tintos Total Shareholder Return (TSR) with the TSR of a comparator group of 15 other international mining companies over the same four year period. Rio Tintos
TSR is calculated as a weighted average of the TSR of Rio Tinto plc and
Rio Tinto Limited (previously of Rio Tinto plc alone). The composition
of this comparator group is reviewed regularly by the committee to provide
continued relevance in a consolidating industry. The current members of
this group are listed at the bottom of the table below.
The
committee continues to regard TSR as the most appropriate measure of a
companys performance for the purpose of share based long term incentive
plans.
The maximum award size under the MCCP will be increased from 70 per cent of salary to two times salary for 2004 and future years calculated on the average Share price over the previous financial year. This increase is balanced by the reduction in SOP maximum grant size referred to above.
The following table shows the percentage of each conditional award which will be received by directors and product group chief executives based on Rio Tinto four year TSR performance relative to the comparator group (for grants after 1 January 2004).
Ranking in comparator group | |||||||||||||||
1st-2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th-16th | ||||||||
% | 150 | 125 | 100 | 83.75 | 67.5 | 51.25 | 35 | 0 | |||||||
The historical ranking of Rio Tinto in relation to the comparator group is shown in the following table:
Ranking
of Rio Tinto versus
comparator companies
Period | Ranking |
1992-96 | 8th |
1993-97 | 4th |
1994-98 | 4th |
1995-99 | 2nd |
1996-00 | 2nd |
1997-01 | 2nd |
1998-02 | 3rd |
1999-03 | 7th |
Current
comparator companies: Alcan, Alcoa, Anglo American, Barrick Gold, BHP Billiton, Freeport, Grupo Mexico, INCO, MIM, Newmont, Noranda, Phelps Dodge, Placer Dome, Teck Cominco and Xstrata |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 63 |
Remuneration report continued
Going forward, following the acquisition of MIM Holdings Limited by Xstrata Limited, MIM Holdings Limited will be replaced by WMC Resources Limited.
Prior
to awards being released to participants, the Groups performance
relative to the comparator companies is reviewed by the external auditors.
The Remuneration committee retains discretion to satisfy itself that the TSR performance is a genuine reflection of underlying financial performance.
Awards will be released to participants in the form of Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited shares or an equivalent amount in cash, as appropriate. In addition, a cash payment will be made to participants equivalent to the dividends that would have accrued on that vested number of shares over the four year period. Such shares may be acquired by purchase in the market, by subscription or, in the case of Rio Tinto Limited, by procuring that Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited transfers existing shares to participants.
Other
share plans UK executive directors may participate in: |
|
• | the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plan, an Inland Revenue approved savings related plan which is open to all employees and under which employees may buy shares on potentially favourable terms; and |
• | the Rio Tinto Share Ownership Plan, an Inland Revenue approved share incentive plan which was approved by shareholders at the 2001 annual general meeting and introduced in 2002. Under this plan, eligible employees may save up to £125 per month which the plan administrator invests in Rio Tinto plc shares. Rio Tinto matches these purchases on a one for one basis. In addition, eligible employees may receive an annual award of Rio Tinto plc shares up to a maximum of five per cent of salary, subject to a cap of £3,000. |
Australian executive directors may participate in the Rio Tinto Limited Share Savings Plan introduced in 2001, which is similar to the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plan.
Pension and superannuation arrangements
UK executive
directors are, like all UK staff, eligible to participate in the non contributory
Rio Tinto Pension Fund, a funded, Inland Revenue approved, final salary occupational
pension scheme.
The
Fund provides a pension from normal retirement age at 60 of two thirds
final pensionable salary, subject to completion of 20 years service. Spouse and dependants pensions
are also provided.
Proportionally lower benefits are payable for shorter service. Members retiring early may draw a pension reduced by approximately four per cent a year for each year of early payment from age 50 onwards.
Under the rules of the Rio Tinto Pension Fund, all pensions are guaranteed to increase
annually in line with increases in the UK Retail Price Index subject to a maximum of ten per cent per annum. Increases above this level are discretionary.
When
pensionable salary is limited by the UK Inland Revenue earnings cap,
benefits are provided from unfunded supplementary arrangements.
Cash contributions were not paid in 2003 as the Rio Tinto Pension Fund remained fully funded.
In
June 2003, the Government announced that the implementation of the proposals
in the Green Paper Simplicity, Security and Choice: working and saving for retirement was delayed until April 2005. The review of Rio Tinto plcs UK pension arrangements envisaged in last years report has therefore been correspondingly delayed to 2004 to take account of changes in the Governments
proposals and timetable.
Australian
executive directors are eligible for membership of the Rio Tinto Staff
Superannuation Fund, a funded superannuation fund regulated by Australian
legislation, that provides both defined benefit and defined contribution
benefits. In 2003, cash contributions were paid into the Rio Tinto Staff
Superannuation Fund to fund members defined benefit and defined contribution
benefits. The Australian executive directors are not required to pay contributions.
They are defined benefit members, accruing lump sums payable on retirement
after age 57 of 20 per cent of final basic salary for each year of service.
Retirement
benefits are limited to a lump sum multiple of seven times final basic salary
at age 62.
For retirement after 62, the benefit increases to 7.6 times average salary
at age 65. In January 2004, Leigh Cliffords contractual retirement
age was reduced from 62 to 60. A corresponding change has been made to
his retirement
arrangements. Death in service and disablement benefits are provided as lump
sums and are equal to the prospective age 65 retirement benefit. Proportionate
benefits are also payable on termination of employment for ill health or resignation.
Annual awards under the STIP are pensionable up to a maximum value of 20 per cent of basic salary. The percentage of total remuneration which is dependent on performance is substantial and has risen over recent years. In view of this, the committee considers it appropriate that a proportion of such pay should be pensionable.
Details
of directors pension and superannuation entitlements are set out
in Table 2 on page 66.
Other benefits
Other remuneration
items include health benefits and a car allowance. Housing and childrens
education assistance are also provided for executive directors and product group
chief executives living outside their home country.
Full details of the directors annual remuneration before tax and excluding pension contributions are set out in Table 1 on page 65. Details of long term incentive plans and option plans are set out on page 67.
Chairmans
letter of appointment
Paul
Skinners
letter of appointment summarises his duties as chairman of the Group and was
agreed by the Remuneration committee.
It stipulates that he is expected to dedicate at least three days per week on
average to carry out these duties. The letter envisages that Mr Skinner will
continue in the role of chairman until he reaches the age of 65 in 2009, subject
to re-election as a director by shareholders. Details of Mr Skinners fees
can be found in Table 1 on page 65.
Service contracts and compensation payments
All executive
directors have service contracts with a one year notice period. Under current
pension arrangements, directors are normally expected to retire at the age of
60, except Oscar Groeneveld, whose agreed retirement age is 62. In the event
of early termination, the Groups policy is to act fairly in all circumstances
and the duty to mitigate would be taken into account. Compensation would not
reward poor performance.
Of
the directors proposed for election or re-election at the forthcoming annual
general meetings, Leigh Clifford and Guy Elliott have service contracts
which are terminable by one years notice.
Sir
Richard Giordano, Sir John Kerr and Sir Richard Sykes do not have service contracts.
Sir Richard Giordano will be aged 70 at the time of the 2004 annual general meetings.
Special notice for his re-election has been received by Rio Tinto plc.
Non
executive directors fees
and letters of appointment
The
boards as a whole
determine non executive directors fees. They are set to reflect the responsibilities
and time spent by the directors on the affairs of Rio Tinto. Non executive directors
are not eligible to vote on any increases of their fees. The boards reviewed
these fees in October 2003 and, in the light of the increased volume of committee
work following regulatory developments in the UK, US and Australia, it was decided
to introduce additional fees for membership of the Audit committee, increase the Audit committee chairmans
fees and introduce a fee for chairing the Remuneration committee.
In recognition of exchange rate movements, Australian directors basic fees were increased to bring them into line with the directors who are paid in pounds sterling. Non executive directors do not participate in the Groups
incentive plans, pension or superannuation arrangements or any other elements
of remuneration provided to executive directors.
64 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Non executive directors do not have service contracts, but have a formal letter of appointment setting out their duties and responsibilities.
Directors share
interests
The
beneficial interests of directors in the share capital of Rio Tinto plc and Rio
Tinto Limited are set out in Table 3 on page 66.
In 2002, the committee informed executive directors and product group chief executives that they would be expected to build up a shareholding equal in value to two times salary over five years. New appointees to executive director or product group chief executive roles have five years from the date of appointment to achieve the required shareholding.
External appointments
Rio
Tinto recognises that executive directors are likely to be invited to become
non executive directors of other companies and that such appointments can broaden
their experience and knowledge, to the benefit of the Group. It is, however,
Group policy to limit such directorships to one FTSE 100 company or equivalent.
No executive director is allowed to take on the chairmanship of another FTSE
100 company. Where such directorships are unlikely to give rise to conflicts
of interests, the boards will normally give consent to the appointment, with
the director permitted to retain the fees earned. Details of fees earned are
set out in the notes to Table 1 below.
Performance
of Rio Tinto
To
illustrate the performance of the companies relative to their markets, graphs
showing the performance of Rio Tinto plc compared to the FTSE 100 Index and Rio
Tinto Limited compared to the ASX All Ordinaries Index are reproduced in this
report. A comparative graph showing Rio Tinto performance relative to the HSBC
Global Mining Index is also included to illustrate the performance of the companies
relative to other mining companies.
Shareholders
will be asked to vote on this Remuneration
report at the Companies forthcoming annual general meetings.
By
order of the board
Anette
Lawless Secretary
Remuneration
committee 20 February 2004
TSR Rio
Tinto plc vs FTSE 100
Total
return basis Index 1998 = 100
TSR Rio
Tinto Limited vs ASX All Share
Total
return basis Index 1998 = 100
TSR Rio
Tinto plc vs HSBC Global Mining Index
Total
return basis Index 1998 = 100
Table 1 Directors remuneration Remuneration of the directors of the parent Companies before tax and excluding pension contributions for the year ended 31 December
2003 | 2003 | 2003 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
£000 except where stated in A$0001 | Salary/fees | Annual bonus2 | Other emoluments3 | Total | Total | ||||||
Chairman | |||||||||||
Paul Skinner4 | 169 | | 4 | 173 | 53 | ||||||
Non executive directors | |||||||||||
Sir David Clementi8 | 49 | | | 49 | | ||||||
Leon Davis | 150 | | | 150 | 150 | ||||||
Sir Richard Giordano | 96 | | | 96 | 93 | ||||||
Andrew Gould | 56 | | | 56 | 4 | ||||||
Sir John Kerr8 | 11 | | | 11 | | ||||||
David Mayhew4 | 56 | | | 56 | 53 | ||||||
John Morschel | A$191 | | | A$191 | A$123 | ||||||
The Hon. Raymond Seitz7 | 21 | | | 21 | 56 | ||||||
Sir Richard Sykes | 57 | | | 57 | 56 | ||||||
Lord Tugendhat | 56 | | | 56 | 53 | ||||||
Executive directors | |||||||||||
Robert Adams9 | 474 | 287 | 30 | 791 | 763 | ||||||
Leigh Clifford chief executive | 665 | 395 | 217 | 1,277 | 1,264 | ||||||
Guy Elliott finance director | 402 | 255 | 21 | 678 | 619 | ||||||
Oscar Groeneveld | 380 | 265 | 80 | 725 | 733 | ||||||
Jonathan Leslie7 | 90 | 51 | 53 | 194 | 597 | ||||||
Sir Robert Wilson retiring chairman6 | 745 | 443 | 20 | 1,208 | 1,441 | ||||||
Notes |
1 | Sterling amounts for salary and other emoluments may be converted to Australian dollars by using an exchange rate of £1=A$2.5204, being the average exchange rate during 2003. |
2 | The annual bonus is payable under the Short Term Incentive Plan and this may be converted to Australian dollars at the year end rate of £1=A$2.3785. |
3 | Other emoluments include benefits in kind including accommodation to Australian directors and share awards to UK executive directors under the Rio Tinto All Employee Share Ownership Plan at a value of up to a maximum of £3,000. |
4 | Mr Mayhews fees are paid to Cazenove Group PLC. Mr Skinners fees were paid to Shell International Limited until 30th September 2003, one month before his appointment as chairman, and thereafter directly to him. £125,000 of the fees and other emoluments relate to Mr Skinners services as chairman. |
5 | Emoluments of £60,546 from subsidiary and associated companies were waived by two executive directors (2002: two directors waived £53,388). Executive directors have agreed to waive any further fees receivable from subsidiary and associated companies. |
6 | Sir Robert Wilson retired as a director from the boards of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited on 31 October 2003 and received gifts to the value of £24,424. |
7 | Mr Leslie resigned as a director on 31 March 2003 and received gifts to the value of £10,995. The Hon. Raymond Seitz retired on 1 May 2003. |
8 | Sir David Clementi was appointed a director on 28 January 2003 and Sir John Kerr appointed a director on 14 October 2003. |
9 | In the course of the year, Sir Robert Wilson received £135,000 and Mr Adams received £22,500 in respect of non Rio Tinto related directorships. |
10 | Awards made under the long term incentive schemes are set out in Tables 4 and 5. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 65 |
Remuneration report continued
Table 2 Directors pension entitlements (as at 31 December 2003)
Accrued benefits | Transfer values3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Age | Years of | At | At | Increase in | Increase In | At | At | Change, net | Transfer value | ||||||||||
service | 31 December | 31 December | accrued benefits | accrued benefit | 31 December | 31 December | of personal | of increase | |||||||||||
completed | 2002 | 2003 | during the year | net of inflation | 2002 | 2003 | contributions | in accrued | |||||||||||
ended 31 | benefit net | ||||||||||||||||||
December 2003 | of inflation | ||||||||||||||||||
£000 pa | £000 pa | £000 pa | £000 pa | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | ||||||||||||
UK directors | pension | pension | pension | pension | |||||||||||||||
Robert Adams | 58 | 33 | 325 | 360 | 35 | 26 | 6,767 | 6,159 | 4 | (608 | ) | 451 | |||||||
Guy Elliott | 48 | 23 | 173 | 212 | 39 | 34 | 2,630 | 2,066 | 4 | (564 | ) | 337 | |||||||
Jonathan Leslie5 | 52 | 25 | 211 | 216 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3,745 | 2,780 | (965 | ) | 44 | |||||||
Sir Robert Wilson6 | 60 | 33 | 656 | 710 | 5 | 54 | 40 | 14,620 | 10,261 | (4,359 | ) | 760 | |||||||
A$000 | A$000 | A$000 | A$000 | A$000 | A$000 | A$000 | A$000 | ||||||||||||
Australian directors | Lump sum | Lump sum | Lump sum | Lump sum | |||||||||||||||
Leigh Clifford2 | 56 | 33 | 9,700 | 12,099 | 2,399 | 2,132 | 9,700 | 12,099 | 2,399 | 2,132 | |||||||||
Oscar Groeneveld2 | 50 | 28 | 4,165 | 4,661 | 496 | 287 | 4,165 | 4,661 | 496 | 287 | |||||||||
Notes |
1 | A$68,309 and A$40,314 were credited to the respective accounts belonging to Mr Clifford and Mr Groeneveld in the Rio Tinto Staff Superannuation Fund in relation to the superannuable element of their 2003 performance bonus. |
2 | The increases in accrued lump sums for Australian directors are before contributions tax and exclude interest. |
3 | Transfer values are calculated in a manner consistent with Retirement Benefit Schemes Transfer Values (GN 11) published by the Institute of Actuaries and the Faculty of Actuaries and dated 4 August 2003. |
4 | During 2003, the basis of calculation of transfer values was reviewed by the UK Fund Trustee as part of a periodic review of all calculation bases following the triennial valuation. The figures shown at 31 December 2003 are calculated using the new basis. |
5 | Mr Leslie left service on 2 April 2003. The accrued entitlement shown above represent the value at the date of leaving. |
6 | Sir Robert Wilson retired at his normal retirement age on 31 October 2003. On retirement he exchanged part of his pension for a cash lump sum, as permitted under the rules of the Fund. The accrued benefit figure as at 31 December 2003 shows the pension accrued at retirement prior to the exchange of pension for cash. The transfer value as at 31 December 2003 reflects the value on the new basis of the residual pension following this exchange. |
Table 3 Directors beneficial interests in shares
1 Jan | 31 Dec | 6 Feb | ||||
20032 | 20038 | 2004 | ||||
Robert Adams3 | 56,599 | 71,764 | 71,782 | |||
Sir David Clementi4 | | | | |||
Leigh Clifford | 2,100 | 2,100 | 2,100 | |||
56,300 | 76,428 | 76,428 | ||||
Leon Davis | 6,100 | 6,100 | 6,100 | |||
133,838 | 187,293 | 187,293 | ||||
Guy Elliott3 | 28,897 | 40,847 | 40,863 | |||
Sir Richard Giordano | 1,065 | 1,065 | 1,065 | |||
Andrew Gould | | | | |||
Oscar Groeneveld | 19,010 | 19,010 | 19,010 | |||
6,909 | 23,515 | 23,515 | ||||
Sir John Kerr4 | | | | |||
Jonathan Leslie5 | 44,886 | 55,396 | n/a | |||
David Mayhew | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | |||
John Morschel | | | | |||
The Hon. Raymond Seitz5 | 500 | 500 | n/a | |||
Paul Skinner | 1,000 | 5,140 | 5,140 | |||
Sir Richard Sykes | 2,294 | 2,359 | 2,359 | |||
Lord Tugendhat | 1,135 | 1,135 | 1,135 | |||
Sir Robert Wilson5 | 114,124 | 138,609 | n/a | |||
Notes |
1 | Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares of 10p each; Rio Tinto Limited shares stated in italics. |
2 | Or date of appointment if later. |
3 | These directors, together with other Rio Tinto plc Group employees, also have an interest in a trust fund containing 21,849 Rio Tinto plc shares at 31 December 2003 (1 January 2003: 102,136 Rio Tinto plc shares) as potential beneficiaries, of The Rio Tinto Share Ownership Trust. At 6 February 2004 this trust fund contained 22,442 Rio Tinto plc shares. |
4 | Sir David Clementi and Sir John Kerr were appointed directors on 28 January 2003 and 14 October 2003 respectively. |
5 | Mr Leslie, The Hon. Raymond Seitz and Sir Robert Wilson retired or resigned as directors on 31 March 2003, 1 May 2003 and 31 October 2003 respectively. |
6 | The above includes the beneficial interests obtained through the Rio Tinto Share Ownership Plan, details of which are set out on page 64 under the heading Other share plans. |
7 | The total beneficial interest of the directors in the Group amounts to less than one per cent. |
8 | Or date of retirement or resignation if earlier. |
66 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Table 4 Awards to directors under long term incentive plans
Plan terms and conditions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monetary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conditional | Performance | Market | Date | Market | value of | ||||||||||||||||||||
award | period | price at | award | price at | 3 |
vested | |||||||||||||||||||
Plan | 1 Jan | Awarded | Lapsed | Vested1 | 31 Dec | granted | concludes | award | vests | vesting | award | ||||||||||||||
2003 | 20032 | £000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert Adams | MCCP 2000 | 27,830 | | 10,437 | 17,393 | | 7/03/2000 | 31/12/2003 | 953 | p | 27/02/2004 | 1,386 | p | 241 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 27,330 | | | | 27,330 | 6/03/2001 | 31/12/2004 | 1,310 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 25,064 | | | | 25,064 | 13/03/2002 | 31/12/2005 | 1,424 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | 26,837 | | | 26,837 | 7/03/2003 | 31/12/2006 | 1,198 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
80,224 | 26,837 | 10,437 | 17,393 | 79,231 | 241 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Leigh Clifford5 | MCCP 2000 | 37,609 | | 14,104 | 23,505 | | 7/03/2000 | 31/12/2003 | A$24.156 | 27/02/2004 | A$35.24 | 348 | 3 | ||||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 37,474 | | | | 37,474 | 6/03/2001 | 31/12/2004 | A$34.406 | | | | ||||||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 34,435 | | | | 34,435 | 13/03/2002 | 31/12/2005 | A$39.600 | | | | ||||||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | 36,341 | | | 36,341 | 7/03/2003 | 31/12/2006 | A$30.690 | | | | ||||||||||||||
109,518 | 36,341 | 14,104 | 23,505 | 108,250 | 348 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guy Elliott | MCCP 2000 | 4,307 | | 1,616 | 2,691 | | 7/03/2000 | 31/12/2003 | 953 | p | 27/02/2004 | 1,386 | p | 37 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 7,845 | | | | 7,845 | 6/03/2001 | 31/12/2004 | 1,310 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 16,935 | | | | 16,935 | 13/03/2002 | 31/12/2005 | 1,424 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | 22,923 | | | 22,923 | 7/03/2003 | 31/12/2006 | 1,198 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
29,087 | 22,923 | 1,616 | 2,691 | 47,703 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Oscar Groeneveld5 | MCCP 2000 | 21,266 | | 7,975 | 13,291 | | 7/03/2000 | 31/12/2003 | A$24.156 | 27/02/2004 | A$35.24 | 197 | 3 | ||||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 20,934 | | | | 20,934 | 6/03/2001 | 31/12/2004 | A$34.406 | | | | ||||||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 20,322 | | | | 20,322 | 13/03/2002 | 31/12/2005 | A$39.600 | | | | ||||||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | 21,469 | | | 21,469 | 7/03/2003 | 31/12/2006 | A$30.690 | | | | ||||||||||||||
62,522 | 21,469 | 7,975 | 13,291 | 62,725 | 197 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan Leslie6 | MCCP 2000 | 21,574 | | 8,091 | 13,483 | | 7/03/2000 | 31/12/2003 | 953 | p | 27/02/2004 | 1,386 | p | 187 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 21,192 | | | | 21,192 | 6/03/2001 | 31/12/2004 | 1,310 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 19,758 | | 19,758 | | | 13/03/2002 | 31/12/2005 | 1,424 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
62,524 | | 27,849 | 13,483 | 21,192 | 187 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sir Robert Wilson | MCCP 2000 | 50,191 | | 18,822 | 31,369 | | 7/03/2000 | 31/12/2003 | 953 | p | 27/02/2004 | 1,386 | p | 435 | |||||||||||
MCCP 2001 | 49,796 | | | | 49,796 | 6/03/2001 | 31/12/2004 | 1,310 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
MCCP 2002 | 47,983 | | | | 47,983 | 13/03/2002 | 31/12/2005 | 1,424 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
MCCP 2003 | | 50,599 | 8,456 | | 42,143 | 7/03/2003 | 31/12/2006 | 1,198 | p | | | | |||||||||||||
147,970 | 50,599 | 27,278 | 31,369 | 139,922 | 435 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Notes |
1 | The Rio Tinto Groups 7th place ranking against the comparator group for the MCCP 2000 award will generate a 62.5 per cent vesting based on the scales applied to conditional awards made prior to 2004. |
2 | Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares of 10p each; Rio Tinto Limited shares stated in italics. |
3 | The shares awarded under the MCCP 2000 vest on 27 February 2004 but, as the performance cycle ended on 31 December 2003, they have been dealt with in this table as if they had vested on that date. The values of these awards have been based on share prices of 1,386p and A$35.24, being the closing share prices on 6 February 2004, the latest practicable date prior to the publication of this annual report. Amounts in Australian dollars have been translated into sterling at the year end exchange rate of £1=A$2.3785. |
4 | The shares awarded under the FTSE 1997 and MCCP 1999 last year vested on 28 February 2003 but, as the performance cycles ended on 31 December 2002, they were dealt with in the 2002 Annual report and financial statements as if they had vested on that date. The values of the awards in the 2002 Annual report and financial statements were based on share prices of 1,169p and A$32.52, being the closing share prices on 14 February 2003, the latest practicable date prior to the publication of the 2002 Annual report and financial statements. Amounts in Australian dollars were translated into sterling at the year end exchange rate of £1=A$2.829.The actual share prices on 28 February 2003, when the awards vested, were 1,268.5p and A$33.3518, with the result that the values of the awards had been understated in respect of Sir Robert Wilson by £105,773, Mr Adams by £61,321, Mr Leslie by £36,304, Mr Davis by £183,279, Mr Clifford by £12,143 and Mr Groeneveld by £36,319 and overstated in respect of Mr Elliott by £4,308. |
5 | Mr Clifford was given a conditional award over 36,341 Rio Tinto Limited shares and Mr Groeneveld was given a conditional award over 21,469 Rio Tinto Limited shares during the year. These awards were approved by the shareholders under ASX Listing Rule 10.14 at the 2002 annual general meeting. |
6 | Following Mr Leslies resignation from the boards of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited on 31 March 2003, the Remuneration committee agreed that his MCCP awards in 2000 and 2001 should continue to the end of their respective performance periods. The 2002 MCCP award was forfeited. |
7 | A full explanation of the MCCP together with the proposed changes under the plan can be found on pages 63 and 64. |
8 | Or as at date of resignation or retirement if earlier. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 67 |
Remuneration report continued
Table 5 Directors options to acquire Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares | |||||||||||||||||||||
Options exercised/cancelled during the year | |||||||||||||||||||||
Holding | Granted5 | Exercised/ | Holding | Weighted | Holding | ||||||||||||||||
at | cancelled | at | average | Number | Option | Market | Gain on | at | |||||||||||||
1 Jan | 31 Dec | option | price | price | exercise | 6 Feb | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 20037 | price | £000 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||
Robert Adams | A | 398,615 | 114,014 | | 512,629 | 1,136p | 512,629 | ||||||||||||||
Leigh Clifford | A | 384,050 | 254,132 | | 638,182 | A$31.10 | 638,182 | ||||||||||||||
B | 208,882 | 208,882 | A$39.87 | 208,882 | |||||||||||||||||
Leon Davis | A | 93,978 | | | 93,978 | A$23.44 | 93,978 | ||||||||||||||
Guy Elliott | A | 106,183 | 98,818 | 27,241 | 177,760 | 1,323p | 8,292 | 820.0p | 1,273p | 38 | 177,760 | ||||||||||
8,645 | 808.8p | 1,273p | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||
7,613 | 965.4p | 1,273p | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,691 | 641.0p | 1,299p | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||
27,241 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Oscar Groeneveld | A | 175,084 | 91,511 | | 266,595 | A$29.83 | 266,595 | ||||||||||||||
B | 73,965 | 73,965 | A$39.87 | 73,965 | |||||||||||||||||
Jonathan Leslie6 | A | 309,775 | | 277,095 | 32,680 | 965p | 55,730 | 808.8p | 1,270p | 257 | n/a | ||||||||||
53,414 | 820.0p | 1,270p | 240 | ||||||||||||||||||
16,341 | 965.4p | | | ||||||||||||||||||
77,749 | 1,265.6p | | | ||||||||||||||||||
71,986 | 1,458.6p | | | ||||||||||||||||||
1,875 | 876.0p | | | ||||||||||||||||||
277,095 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sir Robert Wilson6 | A | 841,076 | 358,273 | 253,954 | 945,395 | 1,288p | 129,636 | 808.8p | 1,292p | 626 | n/a | ||||||||||
124,318 | 1,263.0p | | | ||||||||||||||||||
253,954 | |||||||||||||||||||||
A | is where the options are in respect of shares whose market price at the end of the financial year is equal to, or exceeds, the option price. |
B | is where the options are in respect of shares whose market price at the end of the financial year is below the option exercise price. |
Notes | |
1 | Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares of 10p each; Rio Tinto Limited shares stated in italics. |
2 | Options have been granted under the Share Option Plan, the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plan and the Rio Tinto Limited Share Savings Plan. |
3 | The
options granted to each director have been aggregated, except that any out
of the money options as at 31 December 2003 have been separately aggregated
and disclosed. The closing price of Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares at 31
December 2003 was 1,543p (2002: 1,240p) and the closing price of Rio Tinto
Limited shares at 31 December 2003 was A$37.54 (2002:A$33.95). |
4 | Two directors were granted share options under the Rio Tinto Share Savings Plan that are exercisable between 1 January 2009 and 30 June 2009. One was granted options over 1,431 Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares at 1,107p per share and the other was granted options over 1,431 Rio Tinto Limited shares at A$27.48 per share. |
5 | All
other share options were granted under the Share Option Plan and, subject
to the performance criteria explained on page 63, are exercisable between
7 March 2006 and 7 March 2013. Options were granted over 569,674 Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares at 1,263p per share and over 344,212 Rio Tinto Limited shares at A$33.336 per share. |
6 | No directors options lapsed during the year. Following Mr Leslies resignation 167,951 of his options were cancelled with immediate effect. Following Sir Robert Wilsons retirement 124,318 of his options were also cancelled. |
7 | Or at date of retirement or resignation if earlier. |
Rio Tintos register of directors interests, which is open to inspection, contains full details of directors shareholdings and options to subscribe for Rio Tinto shares.
68 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Table 6 Total remuneration as required under the Australian Corporations Act 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Base | Annual | Other | Subtotal | Pension | Value of | Adjusted for | 2003 | |||||||||
salary/ | cash bonus | benefits | 2 | contributions3 | long term | the term of the | Total | 1 | ||||||||
fees | incentive | Performance | ||||||||||||||
Stated in US$000 | shares | 4 | Period | 5 | US$ | |||||||||||
Chairman | ||||||||||||||||
Paul Skinner | 275 | | 7 | 282 | | | | 282 | ||||||||
Non executive directors | ||||||||||||||||
Sir David Clementi | 80 | | | 80 | | | | 80 | ||||||||
Leon Davis | 245 | | | 245 | | | | 245 | ||||||||
Sir Richard Giordano | 156 | | | 156 | | | | 156 | ||||||||
Andrew Gould | 91 | | | 91 | | | | 91 | ||||||||
Sir John Kerr | 18 | | | 18 | | | | 18 | ||||||||
David Mayhew | 91 | | | 91 | | | | 91 | ||||||||
John Morschel | 123 | | | 123 | | | | 123 | ||||||||
The Hon. Raymond Seitz | 34 | | | 34 | | | | 34 | ||||||||
Sir Richard Sykes | 92 | | | 92 | | | | 92 | ||||||||
Lord Tugendhat | 91 | | | 91 | | | | 91 | ||||||||
Executive directors | ||||||||||||||||
Robert Adams | 774 | 511 | 49 | 1,334 | | 2,834 | (1,964 | ) | 2,204 | |||||||
Leigh Clifford | 1,086 | 703 | 354 | 2,143 | 268 | 5,630 | (3,859 | ) | 4,182 | |||||||
Guy Elliott | 656 | 455 | 35 | 1,146 | | 1,456 | (1,011 | ) | 1,591 | |||||||
Oscar Groeneveld | 621 | 471 | 131 | 1,223 | 156 | 2,284 | (1,586 | ) | 2,077 | |||||||
Jonathan Leslie | 147 | 92 | 104 | 343 | | 331 | (248 | ) | 426 | |||||||
Sir Robert Wilson | 1,217 | 790 | 72 | 2,079 | | 6,961 | (4,775 | ) | 4,265 | |||||||
Five highest paid executives in the Group (other than directors)6 | ||||||||||||||||
Tom Albanese | 549 | 313 | 649 | 1,511 | | 2,726 | (1,858 | ) | 2,379 | |||||||
Preston Chiaro | 419 | 217 | 234 | 870 | | 987 | (679 | ) | 1,178 | |||||||
David Klingner | 434 | 210 | 250 | 894 | 109 | 754 | (533 | ) | 1,224 | |||||||
Christopher Renwick | 681 | 606 | 98 | 1,385 | 156 | 2,106 | (1,461 | ) | 2,186 | |||||||
Sam Walsh | 542 | 443 | 123 | 1,108 | 124 | 1,590 | (1,100 | ) | 1,722 | |||||||
Notes | |
1 | The total remuneration is reported in US dollars. The amounts, with the exception of the annual cash bonus, can be converted into sterling at the rate of £1=US$1.633 or alternatively, into Australian dollars at the rate of US$1=A$1.5434, each being the average exchange rate for the year. The annual cash bonus can be converted at the year end exchange rates of £1=US$1.78 to ascertain the sterling equivalent or alternatively, US$1=A$1.3355 to find the Australian dollar value. Directors remuneration included in the first three columns are as reported in Table 1, converted into US dollars. |
2 | Includes provision of medical cover, car, fuel, 401K contributions in the US, educational assistance, leaving gifts, company paid tax, professional advice, accomodation and costs associated with secondment. |
3 | Includes actual contributions payable to both defined contribution and defined benefit arrangements that are required to secure the pension benefits earned in the year. |
4 | The amount of long term share based compensation represents the estimated value of awards granted under the Rio Tinto Share Option Plan (the SOP), the Share Savings Plan (the SSP) and the Mining Companies Comparative Plan (the MCCP). The estimated value has been calculated using an independent binomial model provided by external consultants Lane, Clark and Peacock LLP. The value of long term share based compensation has been valued in accordance with the guidelines as detailed in the Australian Securities & Investments Commission media release dated 30 June 2003. |
5 | Under Australian GAAP the value of unvested share grants should be spread equally over the term of each scheme's performance period. This adjustment averages the value of the long term incentive shares over a three year period in respect of the SOP, a four year period in respect of the MCCP and the length of the relevant contract period under the SSP. |
6 | The number of share options granted under the Share Option Plan to the five highest paid senior executives in the twelve month period up to 31 December 2003 are as follows: Mr Albanese 139,165 and Mr Chiaro 37,160 over Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares, Mr Renwick 95,392, Mr Walsh 75,863 and Mr Klingner 20,956 over Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares. The options are subject to the performance criteria explained on page 63 and are exercisable between 7 March 2006 and 6 March 2013. Options were granted at 1,263p per ordinary Rio Tinto plc share and at A$33.336 per ordinary Rio Tinto Limited share. The number of conditional shares awarded under the Mining Companies Comparative Plan in respect of the same five senior executives and the same twelve month period to 31 December 2003 are as follows: Mr Albanese 19,274 and Mr Chiaro 7,352 over Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares and Mr Renwick 21,230, Mr Walsh 16,884 and Mr Klingner 10,961 over Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares. The market prices of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares were 1,198p and A$30.69 respectively. Mr Albanese was granted 530 share options over Rio Tinto ordinary shares under the Rio Tinto Share Savings Plan at an option price of £11.50. These may be exercised between 1 January 2006 and 7 January 2006. The number of share options and conditional shares awarded to the executive directors are shown in Tables 4 and 5 of this report. The non executive directors do not participate in the long term incentive share schemes. |
Auditable part
Tables
1, 2, 4 and 5 comprise the auditable part of the Remuneration report,
being the information required by Part 3 of schedule 7a to the Companies Act
1985.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 69 |
Corporate governance
Rio Tinto is committed
to high standards of corporate governance, for which the directors are accountable
to shareholders. Over the last several years, corporate governance discussions
have taken centre stage in the UK, Australia and the US, where Rio Tinto has
its three main listings. In setting out the Groups corporate governance
statement, the boards have therefore referred to the Combined Code as attached
to the UK Listing Authoritys Listing Rules (the current Code), the new
Combined Code (the new Code), the ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines
and the NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards, as well as the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
Rio
Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited have adopted a common approach to corporate governance.
Both Companies have, for the period under review, applied the principles contained
in Part 1 of the current Code. The detailed provisions of Section 1 of the current
Code have been complied with as described below. As at the date of the Directors report
both Companies also complied with the ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance
Guidelines. In addition, Rio Tinto has voluntarily adopted the recommendations
of the US Blue Ribbon Committee in respect of disclosures to shareholders, as
detailed in the Audit
committees statement on page 72. Rio Tinto intends to include on its website a brief summary of significant differences, if any, in the way its corporate governance practices differ from those followed by US companies under NYSE listing standards.
The
boards will continue to monitor developments in the corporate governance area
in Rio Tintos three principal share markets.
A
statement relating to directors responsibilities for going concern and
preparation of the financial statements is on pages 71 and 72.
The board
The
Companies have common boards of directors, which are collectively responsible
for the success of the Group.
Board composition
On
1 November 2003, Paul Skinner, until then an independent non executive director,
became chairman, succeeding Sir Robert Wilson, who retired after 33 years with
Rio Tinto. The boards currently comprise 14 directors, four executive and nine
non executive directors and the chairman.
The boards have reviewed the independence of all non executive directors and determined that, of the nine non executive directors, seven are independent. Notwithstanding that Sir Richard Giordano has served as a director since 1992, the strength, objectivity and nature of his contribution to board and committee discussions were fully consistent with those of an independent director. Two have connections with the Group: Leon Davis
is a former chief executive of the Group and David Mayhew is chairman of one of Rio Tinto plcs stockbrokers. The directors biographies are set out on pages 58 and 59.
Chairman and chief executive
The
roles of the chairman and chief executive are separate and the division of their
responsibilities has been formally approved by the boards.
The role of the board
Collectively,
the non executive directors bring broadly based knowledge and experience to the
boards deliberations and their contribution is vital to corporate accountability.
As recommended in the new Code, they have agreed performance targets for management
against the Groups 2004 financial plan.
The
boards had eight scheduled and one special meeting in 2003. Details of directors attendances
at board and committee meetings are set out in the Directors report on
page 61.
In
line with best practice, the boards have regular scheduled discussions on various
aspects of the Groups strategy. In addition, one meeting was a two day
meeting, the main purpose of which was an in depth discussion of Group strategy.
Management of the business is the responsibility of executive management. The
board approves strategy, major investments and acquisitions and is ultimately
accountable to the shareholders for the performance of the business.
All directors have full and timely access to the information required to discharge their responsibilities fully and effectively.
There
is a formal schedule of matters specifically reserved for decision by the boards,
a copy of which is posted on the Groups website. This schedule is reviewed
regularly to ensure continued relevance.
Going
forward, the chairman will be holding meetings with non executive directors without
the executive directors present. Furthermore the non executive directors will
meet annually in a meeting chaired by the senior non executive director to appraise
the chairmans performance.
Communication with the investor community
The
main channels of communication with the investor community are through the chief
executive, the finance director and the chairman. The Group also organises regular
investor seminars, which provide a two way communication with investors and analysts,
with valuable feedback which is communicated to the boards. In addition, the
Groups external investor relations advisors carry out a survey of major
shareholders opinion and perception of the Group. The ensuing report is
distributed and a formal annual presentation is made to the boards on the subject.
Independent advice
A
procedure has been established for
directors to obtain independent professional advice at the Groups expense in furtherance of their duties as directors. They also have access to the advice and services of both company secretaries.
Election and re-election
All
directors are elected by shareholders at the annual general meetings following
their appointment and, thereafter, are subject to re-election at least once every
three years. Non executive directors are normally expected to serve at least
two terms of three years and, except where special circumstances justify it,
would not normally serve more than three such terms.
Board performance
In
compliance with Clause A.6 of the new Code and Principle 8 of the ASX Best Practice
Corporate Governance Guidelines, the performance of Rio Tintos board, its
committees and individual directors have been evaluated. The assessment has been
carried out by external advisers and has covered the following areas: board dynamics;
board capability; board process; corporate governance, strategic clarity and
alignment; board structure; and the performance of individual directors. In the
opinion of the boards they comply with the requirements of the new Code and the
ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines. It is the intention of the
boards to continue to review both board and director performance on an annual
basis.
Board committees
The
directors have established four committees, all of which are fundamental to good
corporate governance in the Group. All committee terms of reference are reviewed
annually by the boards and the committees themselves, and appear on the Groups
website. Regular reports of committee business and activities are given to the
boards and minutes are circulated to all directors. Committee members, shown
on pages 58 and 59, are all non executive directors.
The Audit
committees main
responsibilities include the review of accounting principles, policies and practices
adopted in the preparation of public financial information; the review with management
of procedures relating to financial and capital expenditure controls, including
internal audit plans and reports; the review with external auditors of the scope
and results of their audit; the nomination of auditors for appointment by shareholders;
and the review of and recommendation to the board for approval of Rio Tintos
risk management policy. Its responsibilities also include the review of corporate
governance practices of Group sponsored pension funds.
A
number of training sessions, which may cover new legislation and other relevant
information, have been incorporated into the committees normal schedule
of business.
70 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
The
external auditors, the finance director, the Group controller and Group internal
auditor attend meetings. A copy of the Audit
committee charter
is reproduced on page 73 and can also be found on the Group website.
The
Remuneration
committee is
responsible for determining the policy for executive remuneration and for the
remuneration and benefits of individual executive directors. Full disclosure
of all elements of directors
and certain senior executives remuneration can be found in the
Remuneration
report on
pages 62 to 69, together with details of the Groups
remuneration policies.
The
Nominations
committee is
chaired by the chairman of Rio Tinto. It is the committees
responsibility to ensure that there is a clear, appropriate and transparent
process in place to source and appoint new directors. Its responsibilities also
include evaluating the balance of skills, knowledge and experience on the boards
and identifying and nominating, for the approval by the boards, candidates to
fill board vacancies as and when they arise. The committee reviews the structure,
size and composition of the boards and make recommendations with regard to any
changes it considers appropriate. Finally, the committee reviews the time required
to be committed to Group business by non executive directors and assess whether
non executive directors are spending enough time to carry out their duties.
The
Committee
on social and environmental accountability is
responsible for reviewing the effectiveness of management policies and procedures
in delivering the standards set out in The
way we work,
Rio Tintos
statement of business practice, which do not fall within the remit of other
board committees and, in particular, those relating to health, safety, the environment
and social issues. The overall objective of the committee is to promote the
development of business practices throughout the Group, consistent with the
high standards expected of a responsibly managed company and to develop the
necessary clear accountability on these practices.
Directors
dealings in shares
Rio Tinto
has a Group policy in place to govern the dealing in Rio Tinto securities. The
policy, which can be viewed on the Rio Tinto website, is no less stringent than
the Model Code set out in the UK Listing Rules.
Directors
and employees are prohibited from dealing when in possession of price sensitive
information. Directors and certain employees are prohibited from dealing during
the close periods which are the periods of up to two months before
a profit announcement. Directors and designated employees are also prohibited
from dealing in Rio Tinto securities at any time on considerations of a short
term nature.
Statement
of business practice
The
way we work provides
the directors and
all
Group employees with a summary of the principal policies and procedures in place
to help ensure that high standards are met.
Policies
are adopted by the directors after wide consultation, both externally and within
the Group. Once adopted they are communicated to business units worldwide, together
with guidance and support on implementation. Business units are then required
to devote the necessary effort by management to implement and report on these
policies.
The
way we work was
reviewed and updated in 2003 to reflect best practice and procedures were introduced
to meet changed requirements. The following policies are currently in place:
health, safety and the environment; communities; human rights; access to land;
employees; business integrity; bribery and corruption; corporate governance;
compliance; external disclosures, including continuous disclosure and code of
ethics covering the preparation of financial statements and political involvement.
These policies apply to all Rio Tinto managed businesses.
In
line with best practice, the Group has in place a Group wide whistle
blowing programme entitled Speak-OUT.
Under this programme, employees are encouraged to report any concerns, including
any suspicion of a violation of the Groups
financial reporting and environmental procedures, through an independent third
party and without fear of recrimination.
In
the case of business partners, such as joint ventures and associated companies,
where the Group does not have operating responsibility, Rio Tintos
policies are communicated to them and they are encouraged to adopt similar policies
of their own. Practical advice is offered wherever appropriate.
In
2001, the Association of British Insurers issued its guidelines relating to
socially responsible investment. Rio Tintos
report on social and environmental matters follows these guidelines and can
be found on pages 55 and 56 of 2003 Annual
report and financial statements and
on pages 22 to 25 of the 2003 Annual
review.
Details of the Groups
overall and individual businesses social and environmental performance
continue to be published on Rio Tintos website: www.riotinto.com
Responsibilities
of the directors
The directors
are required by UK and Australian company law to prepare financial statements
for each financial period which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs
of the Group as at the end of the financial period and of the profit or loss
and cash flows for that period. To ensure that this requirement is satisfied
the directors are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
controls and procedures for financial reporting throughout the Group.
The
directors consider that the financial statements have been prepared in
accordance
with applicable accounting standards, using the most appropriate accounting
policies for Rio Tintos business and supported by reasonable and prudent
judgments. The accounting policies have been consistently applied.
The
directors, senior management, senior financial managers and other members of
staff who are required to exercise judgment in the course of the preparation
of the financial statements are required to conduct themselves with integrity
and honesty and in accordance with the ethical standards of their profession
and/or business.
The
directors are responsible for maintaining proper accounting records, in accordance
with the UK Companies Act 1985 and the Australian Corporations Act 2001 as
modified by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission order dated 21
July 2003, and have a general responsibility for taking such steps as are
reasonably
open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group, and to prevent and detect
fraud and other irregularities.
The
directors are also responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Groups
website. The work carried out by the auditors does not involve consideration
of these matters and, accordingly, the auditors accept no responsibility for
any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements since they were
initially loaded on the website.
Going
concern
The financial
statements have been prepared on the going concern basis. As required by the
current Code, the directors report that they have satisfied themselves that
the Group is a going concern since it has adequate financial resources to continue
in operational existence for the foreseeable future.
Boards statement
on internal control
Rio Tintos
overriding corporate objective is to maximise long term shareholder value through
responsibly and sustainably investing in mining and related assets. The directors
recognise that creating shareholder value is the reward for taking and accepting
risk.
The
directors are responsible for the Groups
system of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness in providing
shareholders with a return on their investments that is consistent with a responsible
assessment and mitigation of risks. This includes reviewing financial, operational
and compliance controls, and risk management procedures. Because of the limitations
inherent in any such system, this is designed to manage rather than eliminate
risk. Accordingly, it provides reasonable, but not absolute assurance, against
material misstatement or loss.
The
directors have established a process for identifying, evaluating and managing
the significant risks faced by the Group.
This process
was in place during 2003 and up to and including the date of approval of the
2003 Annual
report and financial
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 71 |
Corporate governance continued
statements.
The process is reviewed annually by the directors and accords with the guidance
set out in Internal Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code.
The
Groups
management committees review information on the Groups significant risks,
with relevant control and monitoring procedures, for completeness and accuracy.
This information is presented to the directors to enable them to assess the
effectiveness of the internal controls. In addition, the boards and their committees
monitor the Groups significant risks on an ongoing basis.
Assurance
functions, including internal auditors and health, safety and environmental
auditors, perform reviews of control activities and provide regular written
and oral reports to directors and management committees. The directors receive
and review minutes of the meetings of each board committee, in addition to oral
reports from the respective chairmen at the first board meeting following the
relevant committee meeting.
Certain
risks, for example natural disasters, cannot be mitigated to an acceptable degree
using internal controls. Such major risks are transferred to third parties in
the international insurance markets, to the extent considered appropriate.
Each
year, the leaders of Group businesses and administrative offices complete an
internal control questionnaire that seeks to confirm that adequate internal
controls are in place and operating effectively. The results of this process
are reviewed by the Executive
committee it
is then presented to the board as a further part of their review of the Groups
internal controls. This process is continually reviewed and strengthened as
appropriate.
In 2002, the Group also established a
Disclosure
and procedures committee which
was tasked with reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of Group controls over
and procedures for the public disclosure of financial and related information.
The committee has been presenting the results of this process to senior management
and directors and will continue to do so.
The
Group has material investments in a number of joint ventures and associated
companies. Rio Tinto cannot guarantee that local management of mining assets,
where it does not have managerial control, will comply with the Groups
standards or objectives.
Accordingly,
the review of their internal controls is less comprehensive than that for the
Groups
managed operations.
Communications
Communications
with shareholders are given high priority. The boards have responsibility to
ensure that a satisfactory dialogue with shareholders takes place. In addition
to statutory documents, such as the Annual
report and financial statements, Annual review and
Half
year report,
Rio Tinto produces documents on a wide range of subjects, including corporate
social responsibility, which are available on request.
Further
details are set out in the Shareholder information on page 79.
Rio
Tinto maintains a comprehensive website, www.riotinto.com, from which its reports
and other publications can be freely downloaded and through which shareholders
can gain secure online access to their shareholding details. It is also linked
to websites maintained by Group operations, thus offering easy access to a wealth
of detailed information about the Group. Results presentations and other significant
events are also available as they happen and as an archive on the website.
Full
use is made of the annual general meetings to inform shareholders of current
developments through appropriate presentations and to provide opportunities
for questions. Significant
matters affecting both Companies
are dealt with under the joint voting procedure, detailed on page 78. Votes,
which are cast on a poll, are announced after the close of the later of the
two annual general meetings. In addition the Companies respond to individual
queries on many issues.
Audit
committee: US Blue Ribbon
Compliance statement
The
Audit
committee meets
the membership requirements of the Combined Code in the UK and the Blue Ribbon
Report in the US. The Group also meets the disclosure requirements in respect
of audit committees required by the Australian Stock Exchange. The Audit
committee is
governed by a written charter approved by the boards, which the Audit
committee reviews
and reassesses each year for adequacy. A copy of this charter is reproduced
on page 73.
The
Audit
committee comprises
the five members set out below. The members, with the exception of David Mayhew,
are independent and are free of any relationship that would interfere with
impartial judgment in carrying out their responsibilities. Mr Mayhew is technically
not deemed to be independent by virtue of his professional association with
the Group in his capacity as chairman of Cazenove Group plc, a stockbroker
and financial adviser to Rio Tinto plc. However, the boards have determined
that, in their business judgment, the relationship does not interfere with
Mr Mayhews
exercise of independent judgment and they believe that his appointment is
in the best interests of the Group because of the substantial financial knowledge
and expertise he brings to the committee.
Report
of the Audit committee
The
Audit
committee met
eight times in 2003. We monitor developments in corporate governance in the
US, Australia and the UK. We do so to ensure the Group continues to apply high
and appropriate standards relevant to the jurisdictions in which we operate.
Many
of the new US requirements have long been best practice and are incorporated
into the committees
Charter, reproduced on
page
73. The Charter is subject to regular discussion and has been reviewed in the
light of new requirements and emerging best practice.
There
is in place a set of procedures, including budgetary guidelines, for the appointment
of the external auditor to undertake non audit work, which aims to provide the
best possible goods and services for the Group at the most advantageous price.
We review the independence of the external auditors on an annual basis and a
process is also in place to review their effectiveness to ensure that the Group
continues to receive an efficient and unbiased service.
Financial
expert
In
January 2003, the Audit
committee reviewed
the SEC requirements for audit committees
financial experts, and, following an indepth assessment, recommended that
the
boards consider indentifying Sir Richard Giordano, Sir David Clementi, and
Andrew Gould as the Audit
committees financial
experts, to be identified as such in the 2003 Annual
report and financial statements,
subject to the board satisfying itself that they fulfilled the SEC criteria.
At their subsequent meeting, the boards considered each of the above and resolved
that they each possessed the requisite experience, appropriately required,
to
qualify as financial experts.
2003
financial statements
We
have reviewed and discussed with management the Groups audited financial
statements for the year ended 31 December 2003.
We
have discussed with the external auditors the matters described in the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants Auditing Standard No. 90, Audit Committee
Communications, and in the UK Statement of Auditing Standard No 610, Reporting
to those charged with Governance (SAS 610), including their judgments regarding
the quality of the Groups
accounting principles and underlying estimates.
We
have discussed with the external auditors their independence, and received and
reviewed their written disclosures, as required by the US Independence Standards
Boards
Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees and SAS 610.
Based
on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we have recommended to the
boards of directors that the financial statements referred to above be included
in the annual report.
Sir
Richard Giordano (Chairman)
Sir David
Clementi
Andrew Gould
David Mayhew
Lord Tugendhat
72 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Audit committee charter
Scope
and authority The primary function of the Audit committee is to assist the boards of directors in fulfilling their responsibilities by reviewing |
|
• | the financial information that will be provided to shareholders and the public; |
| the systems of internal financial controls that the boards and management have established; and |
| the Groups auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes. |
In carrying out its responsibilities the committee has full authority to investigate all matters that fall within the terms of reference of this Charter. Accordingly, the committee may: | |
| obtain independent professional advice in the satisfaction of its duties at the cost of the Group; and |
| have such direct access to the resources of the Group as it may reasonably require including the external and internal auditors. |
Composition
The Audit
committee shall comprise three or more
non executive directors, at least three of whom shall be independent. The
boards will determine each directors
independence having regard to any past and present relationships with the
Group which, in the opinion of the boards, could influence the directors
judgment.
All members
of the committee shall have a working knowledge of basic finance and accounting
practices. At least one member of the committee will have accounting or related
financial management expertise, as determined by the boards.
A quorum
will comprise any two independent directors.
The committee
may invite members of the management team to attend the meetings and to provide
information as necessary.
Meetings
The committee shall meet not less than four
times a year or more frequently as circumstances require. Audit
committee minutes will be confirmed at
the following meeting of the committee and tabled as soon as practicable at
a meeting of the boards.
The Groups
senior financial management, external auditors and internal auditor shall
be available to attend all meetings.
As part
of its responsibility to foster open communication, the committee should meet
with management, the external auditors and the internal auditor, at least
annually, to discuss any matters that are best dealt with privately.
Responsibilities
The boards and the external auditors are accountable
to shareholders. The Audit
committee is accountable to the boards.
The internal auditor is accountable to the Audit committee and the
finance director.
To
fulfil its responsibilities the committee shall:
Charter | |
| Review and, if appropriate, update this Charter at least annually. |
Financial reporting and internal financial controls | |
| Review with management and the external auditors the Groups financial statements, stock exchange and media releases in respect of each half year and full year. |
| Review with management and the external auditors the accounting policies and practices adopted by the Companies and their compliance with accounting standards, stock exchange listing rules and relevant legislation. |
| Discuss with management and the external auditors managements choice of accounting principles and material judgments, including whether they are aggressive or conservative and whether they are common or minority practices. |
| Recommend to the boards that the annual financial statements reviewed by the committee (or the chairman representing the committee for this purpose) be included in the Groups annual report. |
| Review the regular reports prepared by the internal auditor including the effectiveness of the Groups internal financial controls. |
External auditors | |
| Recommend to the boards the external auditors to be proposed to shareholders. |
| Review with the external auditors the planned scope of their audit and subsequently their audit findings including any internal control recommendations. |
| Periodically consult with the external auditors out of the presence of management about the quality of the Groups accounting principles, material judgments and any other matters that the committee deems appropriate. |
| Review the performance of the external auditors and the effectiveness of the audit process, taking into consideration relevant professional and regulatory requirements. |
| Review and approve the fees and other compensation to be paid to the external auditors. |
| Ensure that the external
auditors submit a written statement outlining
all of its professional relationships
with the Group including the provision
of services that may affect their objectivity
or independence. Review and discuss with the external auditors all significant relationships they have with the Group to determine their independence. |
Internal auditor | |
| Review the qualifications, organisation, strategic focus and resourcing of internal audit. |
| Review the internal audit plans. |
| Periodically consult privately with the internal auditor about any significant difficulties encountered including restrictions on scope of work, access to |
required information or any other matters that the committee deems appropriate. | |
Risk management | ||
| Review and evaluate the internal processes for determining and managing key risk areas. | |
| Ensure the Group has an effective risk management system and that macro risks are reported at least annually to the boards. | |
| Require periodic reports from nominated senior managers: | |
| confirming the operation of the risk management system including advice that accountable management have confirmed the proper operation of agreed risk mitigation strategies and controls, and | |
| detailing material risks. | |
| Address the effectiveness of the Groups internal control system with management and the internal and external auditors. | |
| Evaluate the process the Companies has in place for assessing and continuously improving internal controls, particularly those related to areas of material risk. | |
Other
matters The committee shall also perform any other activities consistent with this Charter that the committee or boards deem appropriate. This will include, but not be limited to: |
|
| Review of the Groups insurance cover. |
| Review of the corporate governance |
practices of Group sponsored pension funds. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 73 |
Shareholder information
DIVIDENDS
Both
Companies have paid dividends on their shares every year since incorporation
in 1962. The rights of Rio Tinto shareholders to receive dividends are explained
under the description of the dual listed companies structure on page 77.
Dividend policy
The
aim of Rio Tintos
progressive dividend policy is to increase the US dollar value of dividends over
time, without cutting them during economic downturns.
The
rate of the total annual dividend, in US dollars, is determined taking into account
the results for the past year and the outlook for the current year. The interim
dividend is set at one half of the total dividend for the previous year. Under
Rio Tintos
dividend policy, the final dividend for each year is expected to be at least
equal to the interim dividend.
Dividend determination
As
the majority of the Groups
sales are transacted in US dollars, it is the most reliable currency in which
to measure the Groups financial performance and is its main reporting currency.
So the US dollar is the natural currency for dividend determination. Dividends
determined in US dollars are translated at exchange rates prevailing two days
prior to announcement and are then declared payable in sterling by Rio Tinto
plc and in Australian dollars by Rio Tinto Limited.
Australian shareholders of Rio Tinto plc can elect to receive dividends in Australian dollars and UK shareholders of Rio Tinto Limited can elect to receive dividends in sterling. If you would like further information contact Computershare.
2003 dividends
The
2003 interim and final dividends were determined at 30.0 US cents and at 34.0
US cents per share respectively and the applicable translation rates were US$1.6256
and US$1.8202 to the pound sterling and US$0.6664 and US$0.7610 to the Australian
dollar.
Final
dividends of 18.68 pence per share and of 44.68 Australian cents per share will
be paid on 6 April 2004. A final dividend of 136 US cents per ADR (each representing
four shares) will be paid by The Bank of New York to the ADR holders of both
Companies on 7 April 2004.
The tables below set out the amounts of interim, final and total cash dividends paid or payable on each share or ADS in respect of each financial year, but before deduction of any withholding tax.
Rio Tinto Group US cents per share | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||
Interim | 30.0 | 29.5 | 20.0 | 19.0 | 16.5 | ||||
Final | 34.0 | 30.5 | 39.0 | 38.5 | 38.5 | ||||
Total | 64.0 | 60.0 | 59.0 | 57.5 | 55.0 | ||||
Rio Tinto plc UK pence per share | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||
Interim | 18.45 | 18.87 | 14.03 | 12.66 | 10.39 | ||||
Final | 18.68 | 18.60 | 27.65 | 26.21 | 23.84 | ||||
Total | 37.13 | 37.47 | 41.68 | 38.87 | 34.23 | ||||
Rio Tinto Limited Australian cents per share | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||
Interim | 45.02 | 54.06 | 39.42 | 32.68 | 25.64 | ||||
Final | 44.68 | 51.87 | 75.85 | 69.76 | 61.47 | ||||
Total | 89.70 | 105.93 | 115.27 | 102.44 | 87.11 | ||||
Rio Tinto plc and | |||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited US cents per ADS | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||
Interim | 120 | 118 | 80 | 76 | 66 | ||||
Final | 136 | 122 | 156 | 154 | 154 | ||||
Total | 256 | 240 | 236 | 230 | 220 | ||||
Dividend reinvestment plan (DRP)
Rio
Tinto offers shareholders a DRP which provides the opportunity to use cash dividends
to purchase Rio Tinto shares in the market, free of commission. Please see Taxation
on pages 75 and 76 for an explanation of the tax consequences. The DRP is available
only to shareholders whose names are recorded on the respective Companys
register and due to local legislation cannot be extended to shareholders in the
US, Canada and certain other countries. Please contact Computershare for further
information.
MARKET LISTINGS
AND SHARE PRICES
Rio Tinto plc
The
principal market for Rio Tinto plc shares is the London Stock Exchange (LSE).
As
a constituent of the Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 index (FTSE 100), Rio
Tinto plc shares trade through the Stock Exchange Electronic Trading Service
(SETS) system.
Central
to the SETS system is the electronic order book on which an LSE member firm can
post buy and sell orders, either on its own behalf or for its clients. Buy and
sell orders are executed against each other automatically in strict price, then
size, priority. The order book operates from 8.00 am to 4.30 pm daily. From 7.50
am to 8.00 am orders may be added to, or deleted from the book, but execution
does not occur. At 8.00 am the market opens by means of an uncrossing algorithm
which calculates the greatest volume of trades on the book which can be executed,
then matches the orders, leaving unexecuted orders on the book at the start of
trading.
All
orders placed on the order book are firm, and are for standard three day settlement.
While the order book is vital to all market participants, orders are anonymous,
with the counterparties being revealed to each other only after execution of
the trade.
Use
of the order book is not mandatory but all trades, regardless of size, executed
over the SETS system are published immediately. The only exception to this is
where a Worked Principal Agreement (WPA)
is entered into for trades greater than 8 x Normal Market Size (NMS). Rio Tinto
plc has an NMS of 75,000 shares. Publication of trades entered under a WPA is
delayed until the earlier of 80 per cent of the risk position assumed by the
member firm taking on the trade being unwound or the end of the business day.
Closing
LSE share prices are published in most UK national newspapers and are also available
during the day on the Rio Tinto and other websites. Share prices are also available
on CEEFAX and TELETEXT and can be obtained through the Cityline service operated
by the Financial Times in the UK: telephone 0906 843 3880; calls are currently
charged at 60p per minute.
Rio
Tinto plc has a sponsored American Depositary Receipt (ADR) facility with The
Bank of New York under a Deposit Agreement, dated 13 July 1988, as amended on
11 June 1990, and as further amended and restated on 15 February 1999. The ADRs
evidence Rio Tinto plc American Depositary Shares (ADS), with each ADR representing
four ordinary shares. The shares are registered with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission, are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and are traded under
the symbol RTP.
Rio
Tinto plc shares are also listed on Euronext and on Deutsche Börse.
The
following table shows share prices for the period indicated, the reported high
and low middle market quotations (which represent an average of bid
and asked prices) for Rio Tinto plcs shares on the LSE based on the
LSE Daily Official List, and the highest and lowest sale prices of the
Rio Tinto plc ADSs as reported on the NYSE composite tape.
Pence per | US$ per | ||||||
Rio Tinto plc | Rio Tinto plc | ||||||
share | ADS | ||||||
High | Low | High | Low | ||||
1999 | 1,495 | 698 | 95.13 | 46.13 | |||
2000 | 1,478 | 900 | 96.56 | 55.13 | |||
2001 | 1,475 | 930 | 84.10 | 55.00 | |||
2002 | 1,492 | 981 | 85.93 | 62.00 | |||
2003 | 1,543 | 1,093 | 111.35 | 71.70 | |||
Aug 2003 | 1,407 | 1,270 | 90.30 | 82.30 | |||
Sept 2003 | 1,420 | 1,283 | 93.83 | 86.41 | |||
Oct 2003 | 1,474 | 1,290 | 100.34 | 86.85 | |||
Nov 2003 | 1,461 | 1,366 | 100.52 | 92.82 | |||
Dec 2003 | 1,543 | 1,421 | 111.35 | 98.50 | |||
Jan 2004 | 1,574 | 1,426 | 116.33 | 103.95 | |||
2002 | |||||||
First quarter | 1,492 | 1,285 | 85.93 | 73.90 | |||
Second quarter | 1,411 | 1,168 | 81.85 | 71.99 | |||
Third quarter | 1,261 | 981 | 77.31 | 62.00 | |||
Fourth quarter | 1,324 | 1,016 | 83.23 | 64.00 | |||
2003 | |||||||
First quarter | 1,298 | 1,093 | 83.80 | 71.70 | |||
Second quarter | 1,272 | 1,129 | 85.26 | 72.30 | |||
Third quarter | 1,420 | 1,132 | 93.83 | 75.31 | |||
Fourth quarter | 1,543 | 1,290 | 111.35 | 86.85 | |||
As at 6 February 2004, there were 66,906 holders of record of Rio Tinto plcs shares. Of these holders, 254 had registered addresses in the US and held a total of 158,205 Rio Tinto plc shares, representing 0.01 per cent of the total number of Rio Tinto plc shares issued and outstanding as at such date. In addition, 82.8 million Rio Tinto plc
74 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
shares were registered in the name of a custodian account in London. These shares were represented by 20.7 million Rio Tinto plc ADSs held of record by 373 ADS holders. In addition, certain accounts of record with registered addresses other than in the US hold shares, in whole or in part, beneficially for US persons.
Rio Tinto Limited
Rio
Tinto Limited shares are listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) and the
Stock Exchange of New Zealand. The ASX is the principal trading market for Rio
Tinto Limited shares. The ASX is a national stock exchange operating in the capital
city of each Australian State with an automated trading system. Although not
listed, Rio Tinto Limited shares are also traded on the LSE.
Closing
ASX share prices are published in most Australian newspapers and are also available
during the day on the Rio Tinto and other websites.
Rio
Tinto Limited also has an ADR facility with The Bank of New York under a Deposit
Agreement, dated 6 June 1989, as amended on 1 August 1989, and as amended and
restated on 2 June 1992. The ADRs evidence Rio Tinto Limiteds
ADSs, each representing four shares and are traded in the over the counter
market under the symbol RTOLY.
The
following tables set out for the periods indicated the high and low closing sale
prices of Rio Tinto Limited shares based upon information provided by the ASX
and the highest and lowest trading prices of Rio Tinto Limited ADSs, as advised
by The Bank of New York. There is no established trading market in the US for
Rio Tinto Limiteds
shares or ADSs.
A$ per | US$ per | ||||||
Rio Tinto Ltd | Rio Tinto Ltd | ||||||
share | ADS | ||||||
High | Low | High | Low | ||||
1999 | 32.76 | 18.71 | 87.00 | 39.25 | |||
2000 | 33.54 | 22.65 | 87.50 | 50.00 | |||
2001 | 38.62 | 28.40 | 80.55 | 54.00 | |||
2002 | 41.35 | 29.05 | 85.24 | 63.62 | |||
2003 | 37.54 | 28.17 | 112.42 | 73.85 | |||
Aug 2003 | 34.31 | 31.55 | 88.83 | 83.19 | |||
Sept 2003 | 35.31 | 32.87 | 94.00 | 88.34 | |||
Oct 2003 | 36.59 | 32.32 | 101.00 | 88.22 | |||
Nov 2003 | 35.96 | 33.68 | 102.56 | 97.52 | |||
Dec 2003 | 37.54 | 34.79 | 112.42 | 101.11 | |||
Jan 2004 | 38.41 | 35.36 | 118.35 | 107.75 | |||
2002 | |||||||
First quarter | 41.35 | 36.42 | 85.24 | 74.96 | |||
Second quarter | 38.63 | 32.81 | 82.47 | 73.71 | |||
Third quarter | 36.00 | 29.32 | 81.77 | 63.62 | |||
Fourth quarter | 34.89 | 29.05 | 78.11 | 63.75 | |||
2003 | |||||||
First quarter | 35.25 | 30.69 | 83.22 | 73.85 | |||
Second quarter | 33.26 | 29.21 | 84.00 | 74.53 | |||
Third quarter | 35.31 | 28.17 | 94.00 | 76.55 | |||
Fourth quarter | 37.54 | 32.32 | 112.42 | 88.22 | |||
As at 6 February 2004, a total of 304,153 Rio Tinto Limited shares were held of record by 208 persons with registered addresses in the US, which represented approximately 0.061 per cent of the total number of Rio Tinto Limited shares issued and outstanding as of such date. In addition, an aggregate of 234,778 Rio Tinto Limited ADSs were outstanding (representing 0.9 million Rio Tinto Limited shares) and were held of
record by 31 persons with registered addresses in the US, which represented less than one per cent of the total number of Rio Tinto Limited shares issued and outstanding. In addition, nominee accounts of record with registered addresses other than in the US may hold Rio Tinto Limited shares, in whole or in part, beneficially for US persons.
ADR holders
ADR
holders may instruct The Bank of New York as to how the shares represented by
their ADRs should be voted.
Registered holders of ADRs will have the Annual review and interim reports mailed to them at their record address. Brokers or financial institutions, which hold ADRs for shareholder clients, are responsible for forwarding shareholder information to their clients and will be provided with copies of the Annual review and interim reports for this purpose.
Rio Tinto is subject to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting requirements for foreign companies. A Form 20-F, incorporating by reference most of the information in the 2003 Annual report and financial statements, will be filed with the SEC. The Form 20-F corresponds to the Form-10K which US public companies are required to file with the SEC. Rio Tintos
Form 20-F and other filings can be viewed on the SEC website at www.sec.gov
Investment warning
Past
performance of shares is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The
value of investments and any income from them is not guaranteed and can fall
as well as rise depending on market movements. You may not
get
back the original amount invested.
Credit
ratings
Rio
Tinto has strong international credit ratings:
Short term | Long term | ||
Standard & Poors Corporation | A-1 | A+ | |
Moodys Investors Service | P-1 | Aa3 | |
The ratings by Standard & Poors Corporation were downgraded during 2002 from A-1+/AA- and are on a stable outlook. The ratings by Moodys Investor Services are on a negative outlook.
TAXATION
UK
resident individuals
Taxation
of dividends
Dividends
carry a tax credit equal to one ninth of the dividend. Individuals who are not
liable to income tax at the higher rate will have no further tax to pay. Higher
rate tax payers are liable to tax on UK dividends at 32.5 per cent which, after
taking account of the tax credit, produces a further tax liability of 25 per
cent of the dividend received.
Reclaiming
income tax on dividends
Tax
credits on dividends are no longer
reclaimable. However, tax credits on dividends paid into Personal Equity Plans or Individual Savings Accounts will continue to be refunded on dividends paid prior to 6 April 2004.
Dividend reinvestment plan (DRP)
The
taxation effect of participation in the DRP will depend on individual circumstances.
Shareholders will generally be liable for tax on dividends reinvested in the
DRP on the same basis as if they had received the cash and arranged the investment.
The dividend should therefore be included in the annual tax return in the normal
way.
The
shares acquired should be added to shareholdings at the date and at the net cost
shown on the share purchase advice. The actual cost of the shares (for Rio Tinto
plc shareholders including the stamp duty/stamp duty reserve tax) will form the
base cost for capital gains tax purposes.
Capital gains tax
Shareholders
who have any queries on capital gains tax issues are advised to consult their
financial adviser.
A
leaflet which includes details of relevant events since 31 March 1982 and provides
adjusted values for Rio Tinto plc securities as at that date is available from
the company secretary.
Australian resident
individuals
Taxation of dividends
The
basis of the Australian dividend imputation system is that when Australian resident
shareholders receive dividends from Rio Tinto Limited, they may be entitled to
a credit for the tax paid by the Group in respect of that income, depending on
the tax status of the shareholder.
The
application of the system results in tax paid by the Group being allocated to
shareholders by way of franking credits attaching to the dividends they receive.
Such dividends are known as franked dividends. A dividend may be partly or fully
franked. The current Rio Tinto Limited dividend is fully franked and the franking
credits attached to the dividend are shown in the distribution statement provided
to shareholders.
The
extent to which a company will frank a dividend depends on the credit balance
in its franking account. Credits to this account can arise in a number of ways,
including when a company pays company tax or receives a franked dividend from
another company. The dividend is required to be included in a resident individual
shareholders
assessable income. In addition, an amount equal to the franking credit attached
to the franked dividend is also included in the assessable income of the
resident individual, who may then be entitled to a rebate of tax equal to
the franking credit amount included in their income.
The
effect of the dividend imputation system on non resident shareholders is that,
to the extent that the dividend is franked, no
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 75 |
Shareholder information continued
Australian tax will be payable and there is an exemption from dividend withholding tax.
A
withholding tax is normally levied at the rate of 15 per cent when unfranked
dividends are paid to residents of countries with which Australia has a taxation
treaty. Most Western countries have a taxation treaty with Australia. A rate
of 30 per cent applies to countries where there is no taxation treaty.
Since
1988, all dividends paid by Rio
Tinto Limited have been fully franked. It is the Groups
policy to pay fully franked dividends whenever possible.
Dividend reinvestment plan (DRP)
Shareholders
will generally be liable for tax on dividends reinvested in the DRP on the same
basis as if they had received the cash and arranged the investment. The dividend
should therefore be included in the annual tax return in the normal way.
The
shares acquired should be added to the shareholding at the date of acquisition
at the actual cost of the shares, which is the amount of the dividend applied
by the shareholder to acquire shares and any incidental costs associated with
the acquisition, including stamp duty, will form part of the cost base or reduced
cost base of the shares for capital gains tax purposes.
Capital gains tax
The
Australian capital gains tax legislation is complex. Shareholders are advised
to seek the advice of an independent taxation consultant on any possible capital
gains tax exposure. If shareholders have acquired shares after 19 September 1985
they may be subject to capital gains tax on the disposal of those shares.
US resident individuals
The
following is a summary of the principal UK tax, Australian tax and US Federal
income tax consequences of the ownership of Rio Tinto plc ADSs, Rio Tinto plc
shares, Rio Tinto Limited ADSs and Rio Tinto Limited shares (the
Groups ADSs and Shares) by a US holder (as defined below). It is
not intended to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations
that are relevant to all classes of taxpayer. Future changes in legislation,
may affect the tax consequences of the ownership of the Groups ADSs and
shares.
It
is based in part on representations by The Bank of New York as Depositary for
the ADRs evidencing the ADSs and assumes that each obligation in the deposit
agreements will be performed in accordance with its terms.
A US
holder is a beneficial owner of securities who, for purposes of the
income tax conventions between the US and both the UK and Australia (the
Conventions), is a resident of the US and is not a US corporation owning
directly or indirectly ten per cent or more of the stock issued by either
of the Companies.
For
the purposes of the Conventions and
of the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the
Code) US holders of ADSs are treated as the owners of the underlying shares.
The
summary describes the treatment applicable under the Conventions in force at
the date of this report.
UK taxation of
shareholdings in
Rio Tinto plc
Taxation of dividends
US
holders do not suffer deductions of UK withholding tax on dividends paid by Rio
Tinto plc. Dividends carry a tax credit equal to one ninth of the net dividend,
or ten per cent of the net dividend plus the tax credit. The tax credit is not
repayable to US holders.
Capital gains
A
US holder will not normally be liable to UK tax on capital gains realised on
the disposition of Rio Tinto plc ADSs or shares unless the holder carries on
a trade, profession or vocation in the UK through a permanent establishment in
the UK and the ADSs or shares have been used for the purposes of the trade, profession
or vocation or are acquired, held or used for the purposes of such a permanent
establishment.
Inheritance tax
Under
the UK Estate Tax Treaty a US holder, who is domiciled in the US and is not a
national of the UK, will not be subject to UK inheritance tax upon the holders
death or on a transfer during the holders lifetime unless the ADSs and
shares form part of the business property of a permanent establishment in the
UK or pertain to a fixed base situated in the UK used in the performance of independent
personal services. In the exceptional case where ADSs or shares are subject both
to UK inheritance tax and to US Federal gift or estate tax, the UK Estate Tax
Treaty generally provides for tax payments to be relieved in accordance with
the priority rules set out in the Treaty.
Stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax
Transfers
of Rio Tinto plc ADSs will not be subject to UK stamp duty provided that the
transfer instrument is not executed in, and at all times remains outside of,
the UK.
Purchases
of Rio Tinto plc shares are subject either to stamp duty at a rate of 50 pence
per £100 or to stamp duty reserve tax (SDRT) at a rate of 0.5 per cent. Conversions
of Rio Tinto plc shares into Rio Tinto plc ADSs will be subject to additional
SDRT at a rate of 1.5 per cent on all transfers to the Depositary or its nominee.
Australian taxation
of shareholdings in
Rio Tinto Limited
Taxation of dividends
US
holders are not normally liable to
Australian
withholding tax on dividends paid by Rio Tinto Limited because such dividends
are normally fully franked under
the
Australian dividend imputation system, meaning that they are paid out of income that has borne Australian income tax. Any unfranked dividends would suffer Australian withholding tax which under the Australian income tax convention is limited to 15 per cent of the gross dividend.
Capital gains
US
holders are not normally subject to any Australian tax on the disposal of Rio
Tinto Limited ADSs or shares unless they have been used in carrying on a trade
or business wholly or partly through a permanent establishment in Australia,
or the gain is in the nature of income sourced in Australia.
Gift, estate and inheritance tax
Australia
does not impose any gift, estate or inheritance taxes in relation to gifts of
shares or upon the death of a shareholder.
Stamp duty
An
issue or transfer of Rio Tinto Limited ADSs or a transfer of Rio Tinto Limited
shares does not require the payment of Australian stamp duty.
US Federal income
tax
Dividends
Dividends
on the Groups
ADSs and shares will generally be treated as dividend income for purposes of
US Federal income tax. In the case of Rio Tinto Limited the income will be the
net dividend plus, in the event of a dividend not being fully franked, the withholding
tax.
Dividend
income will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to US
corporations.
Under
the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 2003, dividends paid by Qualified
Foreign Corporations (QFCs) are subject to a maximum rate of income tax of 15
per cent. This maximum rate applies to taxable years beginning after 31 December
2002 and ending before 1 January 2009. Both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
expect to be QFCs throughout this period. To qualify for the 15 per cent maximum
income tax rate on dividends the stock of the QFC must be held for more than
60 days during the 120 day period beginning on the date which is 60 days before
the ex dividend date.
EXCHANGE CONTROLS
Rio
Tinto plc
At
present, there are no UK foreign exchange controls or other restrictions on the
export or import of capital or on the payment of dividends to non resident holders
of Rio Tinto plc shares or the conduct of Rio Tinto plcs
operations. The Bank of England however upholds international law and maintains
financial sanctions against specified terrorist organisations and specific targets
related to Burma, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia, Iraq and Zimbabwe.
There
are no restrictions under Rio Tinto plcs
memorandum and articles of association
76 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
or under English law that limit the right of non resident or foreign owners to hold or vote Rio Tinto plcs shares.
Rio Tinto Limited | |
Under existing Australian legislation, the Reserve Bank of Australia does not restrict the import and export of funds, and no permission is required by Rio Tinto Limited for the movement of funds into or out of Australia, except that restrictions apply to certain transactions relating to the following: | |
(a) | supporters of the former government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia; and |
(b) | Ministers and senior officials of the Government of Zimbabwe. |
The
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade upholds international law that
prohibits anyone from making assets available to terrorists and their
sponsors. Members of the general public are required to report the sending of A$10,000 or more in currency out of Australia to the Australian Transaction and Reports Analysis Centre. Rio Tinto Limited must also deduct withholding tax from foreign remittances of dividends (to the extent that they are unfranked) and of interest payments. There are no limitations, either under the laws of Australia or under the constitution of Rio Tinto Limited, on the right of non residents, other than the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (the Takeovers Act). The Takeovers Act may affect the right of non Australian residents, including US residents, to acquire or hold Rio Tinto Limited shares but does not affect the right to vote, or any other right associated with any Rio Tinto Limited shares held in compliance with its provisions. Under the Takeovers Act, a foreign person must notify the Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia of a proposal to acquire a substantial shareholding in an Australian corporation, which involves a person, together with associates, holding 15 per cent or more of the issued shares or voting power of the corporation. In addition, acquisition or issue of shares (including an option to acquire shares) in a corporation that carries on an Australian business (such as Rio Tinto Limited) which would result in foreign persons controlling the corporation, or a change in the foreign persons controlling it, is also subject to prior notification to, and review and approval by, the Treasurer, who may refuse approval if satisfied that the result would be contrary to the Australian national interest. A foreign person will control a corporation if it, together with associates, holds 15 per cent or more of the issued shares or voting power, and the Treasurer is satisfied that it is in a position to determine the policy of the corporation, and a number of foreign persons will control a corporation if it, together with associates, holds 40 per cent or more of the issued shares or voting power, and the Treasurer is satisfied that it is in a position to determine the policy of the corporation. |
In the context of the Takeovers Act, a foreign person is: | |
(a) | an individual not ordinarily resident in Australia; |
(b) | any corporation or trust in which there is a substantial foreign interest. |
Unless
the Treasurer
in the particular circumstances deems otherwise, a substantial
foreign interest in a corporation is an interest of 15 per cent or more
in the ownership of voting power by a single foreign interest either alone or
together with associates, or an interest of 40 per cent or more in aggregate
in the ownership or voting power by more than one foreign interest and the associates
of any of them. If a single foreign interest (either alone or together with associates) holds a beneficial interest in 15 per cent or more of the capital or income of a trust, or if two or more foreign interests (and any associates) together hold 40 per cent or more, there will be a substantial foreign interest in the trust. A beneficiary under a discretionary trust is deemed, for this purpose, to hold a beneficial interest in the maximum percentage that could be distributed to the beneficiary. In addition to the Takeovers Act, there are statutory limitations in Australia on foreign ownership of certain businesses, such as banks and airlines, not relevant to Rio Tinto Limited. There are no other statutory or regulatory provisions of Australian law or ASX requirements that restrict foreign ownership or control of Rio Tinto Limited. |
DUAL
LISTED COMPANIES STRUCTURE In December 1995, Rio Tinto shareholders approved the terms of the dual listed companies merger (the DLC merger) which was designed to place the shareholders of both Companies in substantially the same position as if they held shares in a single enterprise owning all of the assets of both Companies. As a condition of its approval of the DLC merger, the Australian Government required Rio Tinto plc to reduce its shareholding in Rio Tinto Limited and, specifically, to 39 per cent by the end of 2005. The current holding is 37.6 per cent. Following the approval of the DLC merger, both Companies entered into a DLC Merger Sharing Agreement (the Sharing Agreement) through which each Company agreed: |
|
(a) | to ensure that the businesses of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited are managed on a unified basis, |
(b) | to ensure that the boards of directors of each Company is the same, and |
(c) | to give effect to certain arrangements designed to provide shareholders of each Company with a common economic interest in the combined enterprise. |
In order to achieve this third objective the Sharing Agreement provided for the ratio of dividend, voting and capital distribution rights attached to each Rio Tinto plc share and to each Rio Tinto Limited share to be fixed in an Equalisation Ratio which has remained |
unchanged at 1:1. The Sharing Agreement has provided for this ratio to be revised
in specified circumstances where for example certain modifications are made to
the share capital of one Company, such as rights issues, bonus issues, share
splits and share consolidations, but not to the share capital of the other. Outside
these specified circumstances, the Equalisation Ratio can only be altered with
the approval of shareholders under the Class
Rights Action approval procedure (described under Voting rights). In addition,
any adjustments are required to be confirmed by the auditors.
One consequence of the DLC merger is that Rio Tinto is subject to a wide range of laws, rules and regulatory review across multiple jurisdictions. Where these rules differ, in many instances it means that Rio Tinto, as a Group, complies with the strictest applicable level.
Consistent with the creation of a single combined enterprise under the DLC merger, directors of each Company are to act in the best interests of the shareholders of both Companies (ie in the best interests of Rio Tinto as a whole). Identified areas where there may be a conflict of the interests of the shareholders of each Company must be approved under the Class Rights Actions approval procedure.
To ensure that directors of each Company are the same, resolutions to appoint or remove directors must be put to shareholders of both Companies as a joint electorate (a Joint
Decision as described under Voting rights) and it is a requirement
that a person can only be a director of one Company if the person is also
a director of the other Company. So, for example, if a person was removed
as a director of one Company, he or she would also cease to be a director
of the other.
Dividend rights
The Sharing Agreement provides for dividends paid on Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares to be equalised on a net cash basis, that is without taking into account any associated tax credits. Dividends are determined in US dollars and are then, except for ADR holders, translated and paid in sterling and Australian dollars. The Companies are also required to announce and pay their dividends and other distributions as close in time to each other as possible.
In the unlikely event that one Company did not have sufficient distributable reserves to pay the equalised dividend (or the equalised capital distribution), it would be entitled to receive a top
up payment from the other Company. The top up payment could be made
as a dividend on the DLC Dividend Share, on the Equalisation Share (if on
issue) or by way of a contractual payment.
If the payment of an equalised dividend would contravene the law applicable to one of the Companies then they may depart from the Equalisation Ratio. However should such
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 77 |
Shareholder information continued
a departure occur then the relevant Company will put aside reserves to be held
for payment on the
relevant shares at a later date.
Rio Tinto shareholders have no direct rights to enforce the dividend equalisation provisions of the Sharing Agreement.
The DLC Dividend Share can also be utilised to provide the Group with flexibility for internal funds management by allowing dividends to be paid between the two parts of the Group. Such dividend payments are of no economic significance to the shareholders of either Company, as they will have no effect on the Groups
overall resources.
Voting rights
In principle the Sharing Agreement provides for the public shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited to vote as a joint electorate on all matters which affect shareholders of both Companies in similar ways. These are referred to as Joint
Decisions. Such Joint Decisions include the creation of new classes of
share capital, the appointment or removal of directors and auditors and the receiving
of annual financial statements. Joint Decisions are voted on a poll.
The Sharing Agreement also provides for the protection of the public shareholders of each Company by treating the shares issued by each Company as if they were separate classes of shares issued by a single company. So decisions that do not affect the shareholders of both Companies equally require the separate approval of the shareholders of both Companies. Matters requiring this approval procedure are referred to as Class
Rights Actions and are voted on a poll.
Thus, the interests of the shareholders of each Company are protected against decisions which affect them and shareholders in the other company differently by requiring their separate approval. For example, fundamental elements of the DLC merger cannot be changed unless approved by shareholders under the Class Rights Actions approval procedure.
Exceptions
to these principles can arise in situations such as where legislation requires
the separate approval of a decision by the appropriate majority of shareholders
in one Company and where approval of the matter by shareholders of the other
Company is not required.
Where a matter has been expressly categorised as either a Joint
Decision or a Class Rights Action, the directors do not
have the power to change that categorisation. If a matter falls within both
categories, it is treated as a Class Rights Action. In addition, the directors
can determine that matters not expressly listed in either category should
be put to shareholders for their approval under either procedure.
To facilitate the joint voting arrangements each Company has entered into shareholder voting agreements. Each Company has issued a Special Voting Share to a special
purpose company held in trust by a common Trustee. Rio Tinto plc has issued its Special Voting Share (RTP Special Voting Share) to RTL Shareholder SVC and Rio Tinto Limited has issued its Special Voting Share (RTL Special Voting Share) to RTP Shareholder SVC. The total number of votes cast on Joint Decisions by the public shareholders of one Company are voted at the parallel meeting of the other Company. The role of these special purpose companies in achieving this is described below.
In exceptional circumstances, certain public shareholders of the Companies can be excluded from voting at the respective Companys
general meetings (because they have acquired shares in one Company in excess
of a given threshold without making an offer for all the shares in the other
Company). If this should occur, the votes cast by these excluded shareholders
will be disregarded.
Following the Companies general
meetings the overall results of the voting on Joint Decisions and the results
of voting on separate decisions will be announced to the stock exchanges,
published on the Rio Tinto website and advertised in the Financial Times
and The Australian newspapers. The results of the 2004 annual general meetings
may also be obtained on the appropriate shareholder helpline (Rio Tinto plc:
Freephone 0800 435021, and Rio Tinto Limited toll free 1800 813 292).
Rio Tinto plc
At a Rio Tinto plc shareholders meeting
at which a Joint Decision will be considered, each Rio Tinto plc share will carry
one vote and the holder of its Special Voting Share will have one vote for each
vote cast by the public shareholders of Rio Tinto Limited. The holder of the
Special Voting Share is required to vote strictly and only in accordance with
the votes cast by public shareholders for and against the equivalent resolution
at the parallel Rio Tinto Limited shareholders meeting.
The holders of Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares do not actually hold any voting shares in Rio Tinto plc by virtue of their holding in Rio Tinto Limited and cannot enforce the voting arrangements relating to the Special Voting Share.
Rio Tinto Limited
At a Rio Tinto Limited shareholders meeting
at which a Joint Decision will be considered, each Rio Tinto Limited share will
carry one vote and, together with the Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares held
by Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Ltd, the holder of its Special Voting Share will
carry one vote, for each vote cast by the public shareholders of Rio Tinto plc
in their parallel meeting. Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Ltd and the holder of
the Special Voting Share are required to vote strictly and only in accordance
with the votes cast for and against the equivalent resolution at the parallel
Rio Tinto plc shareholders meeting.
The holders of Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares do not actually hold any voting shares in Rio Tinto Limited by virtue of their holding in Rio Tinto plc and cannot enforce the voting arrangements relating to the Special Voting Share.
Capital
distribution rights
If
either of the Companies goes into liquidation, the Sharing Agreement provides
for a valuation to be made of the surplus assets of both Companies. If
the surplus assets available for distribution by one Company on each of
the shares held by its public shareholders exceed the surplus assets available
for distribution by the other Company on each of the shares held by its
public shareholders then an equalising payment between the two Companies
will be made, to the extent permitted by applicable law, such that the
amount available for distribution on each Share held by public shareholders
of each Company conforms to the Equalisation Ratio. The objective is to
ensure that the public shareholders of both Companies have equivalent rights
to the assets of the combined Group on a per share basis taking account
of the equalisation ratio.
The
Sharing Agreement does not grant any enforceable rights to the shareholders
of either Company upon liquidation of a Company.
Limitations
on ownership of shares and merger obligations
The
laws and regulations of the UK and Australia impose certain restrictions
and obligations on persons who control interests in public quoted companies
in excess of certain thresholds that, under specific circumstances, include
obligations to make a public offer for all of the outstanding issued shares
of the relevant company. The threshold applicable to Rio Tinto plc under
UK law and regulations is 30 per cent and to Rio Tinto Limited under Australian
laws and regulations is 20 per cent.
As
part of the DLC merger, the memorandum and articles of association of Rio
Tinto plc and the constitution of Rio Tinto Limited were amended with the
intention of extending these laws and regulations to the combined enterprise
and in particular to ensure that a person cannot exercise control over
one Company without having made offers to the public shareholders of both
Companies. It is consistent with the creation of the single economic enterprise
and the equal treatment of the two sets of shareholders, that these laws
and regulations should operate in this way. The articles of association
of Rio Tinto plc and the constitution of Rio Tinto Limited impose restrictions
on any person who controls, directly or indirectly, 20 per cent or more
of the votes on a Joint Decision. If, however, such a person only has an
interest in Rio Tinto Limited or Rio Tinto plc, then the restrictions will
only apply if they control, directly or indirectly, 30 per cent or more
78 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
of the votes
at that Companys general meetings.
If one of the thresholds specified above is breached then, subject to certain limited exceptions and notification by the relevant Company, such persons (i) may not attend or vote at general meetings of the relevant Company; (ii) may not receive dividends or other distributions from the relevant Company; and (iii) may be divested of their interest by the directors of the relevant Company. These restrictions will continue to apply until such persons have either made a public offer for all of the publicly held shares of the other Company or have reduced their controlling interest below the thresholds specified or have acquired through a permitted means at least 50 per cent of the voting rights of all the shares held by the public shareholders of each Company.
These provisions are designed to ensure that offers for the publicly held shares of both Companies would be required to avoid the restrictions set forth above, even if the interests which breach the thresholds are only held in one of the Companies. The directors do not have the discretion to exempt a person from the operation of these rules.
Under the Sharing Agreement, the
Companies agree to cooperate to enforce the restrictions contained in their articles of association and constitution and also agree that no member of the Rio Tinto Group shall accept a third party offer for Rio Tinto Limited shares unless such acceptance is approved by a Joint Decision of the public shareholders of both Companies.
Guarantees
In December 1995, each Company entered into a Deed Poll Guarantee in favour of creditors of the other Company. Pursuant to the Deed Poll Guarantees, each Company guaranteed the contractual obligations of the other Company (and the obligations of other persons which are guaranteed by the other Company), subject to certain limited exceptions. Beneficiaries under the Deed Poll Guarantees may make demand upon the guarantor thereunder without first having recourse to the Company or persons whose obligations are being guaranteed. The obligations of the guarantor under each Deed Poll Guarantee expire upon termination of the Sharing Agreement and under other limited circumstances, but only in respect of obligations arising after such termination and, in the case of other limited circumstances, the publication and expiry of due notice. The shareholders of the Companies cannot enforce the provision of the Deed Poll Guarantees.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
General shareholder enquiries
Computershare Investor Services PLC and Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited are the registrars for Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, respectively. All enquiries
and correspondence concerning shareholdings (other than shares held in ADR form) should be directed to the respective registrar. Their addresses and telephone numbers are given under Useful addresses on the inside back cover. Shareholders should notify Computershare promptly in writing of any change of address.
All enquiries concerning shares held in ADR form should be directed to The Bank of New York, whose address and telephone number is also given under Useful addresses.
Shareholders can obtain details about their shareholding on the internet. Full details, including how to gain secure access to this personalised enquiry facility, are given on the Computershare website: www.computershare.com
Consolidation of share certificates
If a certificated shareholding in Rio Tinto plc are represented by several individual shares certificates, they can be replaced by one consolidated certificate; there is no charge for this service. Share certificates should be sent to Computershare together with a letter of instruction.
Share certificates name
change
Share certificates in the name of The RTZ Corporation PLC remain valid notwithstanding the name change to Rio Tinto plc in 1997.
Share warrants to bearer
All outstanding share warrants to bearer of Rio Tinto plc have been converted into registered ordinary shares under the terms of a Scheme of Arrangement sanctioned by the Court in 2001. Holders of any outstanding share warrants to bearer should contact the company secretary of Rio Tinto plc for an application form in order to obtain their rights to registered ordinary shares.
Low cost share dealing service
Stocktrade
operates the Rio Tinto Low Cost Share Dealing Service which provides a simple
telephone
facility for buying and selling Rio Tinto plc shares. Basic commission is 0.5
per cent up to £10,000, reducing to 0.2 per cent thereafter (subject to a minimum commission of £15).
Further information is available from Stocktrade, a division of Brewin Dolphin
Securities which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
Their details are given under Useful addresses.
Individual Savings Account (ISA)
Stocktrade offers UK residents the opportunity to hold Rio Tinto plc shares in an ISA. Existing PEPs or ISAs may also be transferred to Stocktrade. Further information can be obtained from Stocktrade whose details are given under Useful addresses.
Corporate nominee service
Computershare in conjunction with Rio Tinto plc, have introduced a corporate nominee
service for private individuals. Further information can be obtained from Computershare.
Publication of financial statements
Shareholders wishing to receive the Annual report and financial statements and/or the
Annual review in electronic rather than paper form should register their instruction on the Computershare website.
Unsolicited mail
Rio Tinto is aware that some shareholders have had occasion to complain that outside organisations, for their own purposes, have used information obtained from the Companies share
registers. Rio Tinto, like other companies, cannot by law refuse to supply such
information provided that the organisation concerned pays the appropriate statutory
fee.
Shareholders in the UK who wish to stop receiving unsolicited mail should register with The Mailing Preference Service by letter, telephone or through their website.
The Mailing Preference Service
Freepost 22
London W1E 7EZ
Telephone: 020 7291 3310
Website: www.mpsonline.org.uk
Rio Tinto on the web
Rio Tinto maintains a substantial amount of information on its website, including this and previous annual reports, many other publications and links to websites of Group companies.
The maintenance and integrity of the Rio Tinto website is the responsibility of the directors. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Website: www.riotinto.com
General enquiries
If you require general information about the Group please contact the External Affairs department. For all other enquiries please contact the relevant company secretary or the share registrar.
Full parent entity Financial statements for Rio Tinto Limited are available free of charge from the Rio Tinto Limited company secretary on request. These Financial statements are also available on the Rio Tinto website.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 79 |
Other disclosures
Major shareholders
and related party transactions
Major shareholders
As far as
is known, Rio Tinto plc is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by
another corporation or by any government. The Capital Group of Companies Inc.
by way of a notice dated 5 February 2004 informed the Company of its interest
in 65,148,434 Ordinary shares representing 6.1 per cent of its shares as at 6
February 2004. Rio Tinto plc does not know of any arrangements which may result
in a change in its control. As of 6 February 2004, the total amount of the voting
securities owned by the directors of Rio Tinto plc as a group was 152,054 Ordinary
shares of 10p each representing less than one per cent of the number of shares
in issue.
As far as is known, Rio Tinto Limited, with the exception of the arrangements for the dual listed companies structure described under Shareholder information on page 77, is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or by any government. As of 6 February 2004, the only person known to Rio Tinto Limited as owning more than five per cent of its shares was Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited with 187,439,520 shares, representing 37.5 per cent of its issued capital. Rio Tinto Limited does not know of any arrangements which may result in a change in its control. As of 6 February 2004, the total amount of the voting securities owned by the directors of Rio Tinto Limited as a group was 287,236 shares representing less than one per cent of the number in issue.
Related party transactions
Details of the Groups
material related party transactions are set out in note 38 Related party
transactions, on page 122 of the Financial statements.
As explained on page 32, the Groups
Financial statements show the full extent of the Groups financial commitments
including debt and similar exposures. It has never been the Groups practice
to engineer financial structures as a way of avoiding disclosure. Substance rather
than form is a fundamental principle of Rio Tintos reporting.
Financial information
Legal proceedings
Neither Rio Tinto plc nor Rio Tinto Limited nor any of their subsidiaries is a defendant in any proceedings which the directors believe will have a material effect on either Companys
financial position and results of operations.
Dividends
The Groups
policy on dividend distributions is set out under Shareholder information on
page 74.
Post balance sheet events
There have been no significant post balance sheet events.
The offer and listing
Share
prices and details of the markets on which the Groups
shares are traded are set out under Shareholder information on page 74.
Additional information
Memorandum
and articles of association
There
have been no changes to either Rio Tinto plcs
memorandum and articles of association since new articles of association were
adopted by Special Resolution passed on 11 April 2002 or to Rio Tinto Limiteds
constitution since it was amended by Special Resolution passed on 18 April 2002.
Exchange controls
At
present, there are no exchange controls or other restrictions that affect remittance
of the Groups
dividends to US residents, but see Shareholder information on page 77 for controls
on remittances from Australia to certain specific territories.
There are no restrictions under Rio Tinto plcs
memorandum and articles of association or under English law that limit the
right of non resident or foreign owners to hold or vote its shares. There
are also no restrictions under Rio Tinto Limiteds constitution or under
Australian law that limit the right of non residents to hold or vote its
shares, except under the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975, see
Shareholder information on page 77 for details.
Taxation
See
Shareholder information on page 75 for information regarding the tax consequences
of holding the Groups
ADSs and shares by US residents.
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
The
Rio Tinto Groups
policies for currency, interest rate and commodity price exposures, and the use
of derivative financial instruments are discussed in the Financial review on
pages 32 to 36. In addition, the Groups quantitative and qualitative disclosures
about market risk are set out in note 28 to the Financial statements on pages
111 to 116.
Defaults, dividend arrearages and delinquencies
There
are no defaults, dividend arrearages or delinquencies.
Material modification to the rights of security holders and use of proceeds
There
are no material modifications to the rights of security holders.
Controls and procedures
In
designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures of each of Rio
Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, the management of each of Rio Tinto plc and
Rio Tinto Limited, including their chief executive and finance director, recognised
that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives, and the management of each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
necessarily was required to apply its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations
in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance
that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within each of Rio Tinto
plc and Rio Tinto Limited have been detected.
The management of each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, with the participation of their chief executive and finance director have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(c) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive and finance director of each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There were no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls of each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited subsequent to the date of their most recent evaluation.
Audit committee financial expert
See Corporate governance on page 72 for information regarding the identification of the Audit committee financial expert.
Code of ethics
The way we work, Rio Tintos
statement of business practice, summarises the Groups principles and policies
for all directors and employees.
Since the first edition of The way we work in 1997, expectations of corporate responsibilities have increased. Although the Groups
values and objectives are unchanged, its responses have evolved and have
been further developed and reflected in a revised 2003 edition.
The way we work is supported by supplementary guidance documents and applies to all Rio Tinto managed businesses.
The way we work and the supplementary guidance documents are discussed more fully under Corporate governance on page 71. They can be viewed on Rio Tintos
website: www.riotinto.com and will be provided to any person without charge
upon written request received by one of the company secretaries.
Principal accountant fees and services
Auditors remuneration
including audit fees, audit related fees, taxation fees and all other fees have
been dealt with in note 37 Auditors remuneration, on page 121 of
the Financial statements.
80 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Contents
Page | |
Financial information by business unit | 132 |
Australian Corporations Act summary of ASIC class order relief | 134 |
Directors Declaration | 134 |
Report of the Independent Auditors | 135 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 81 |
Profit and loss account Years ended 31 December
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
Note | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Gross turnover (including share of joint ventures and associates) | 11,755 | 10,828 | ||||||||
Share of joint ventures' turnover | (1,820 | ) | (1,662 | ) | ||||||
Share of associates turnover | (707 | ) | (723 | ) | ||||||
Consolidated turnover | 9,228 | 8,443 | ||||||||
Net operating costs | 2 | (7,732 | ) | (7,612 | ) | |||||
Group operating profit | 1,496 | 831 | ||||||||
Share of operating profit of joint ventures | 536 | 532 | ||||||||
Share of operating profit of associates | 234 | 239 | ||||||||
Profit on disposal of interests in subsidiary, joint venture and associate | 35 | 126 | - | |||||||
Profit on ordinary activities before interest | 2,392 | 1,602 | ||||||||
Net interest payable | 5 | (206 | ) | (237 | ) | |||||
Amortisation of discount | 6 | (92 | ) | (54 | ) | |||||
Profit on ordinary activities before taxation | 2,094 | 1,311 | ||||||||
Taxation | 7 | (567 | ) | (708 | ) | |||||
Profit on ordinary activities after taxation | 1,527 | 603 | ||||||||
Attributable to outside equity shareholders | (19 | ) | 48 | |||||||
Profit for the financial year (net earnings) | 1,508 | 651 | ||||||||
Exceptional items impact on the above revenues and costs as follows: | ||||||||||
Profit on disposal of interests in subsidiary, joint venture and associate | 126 | - | ||||||||
Asset write downs | - | (978 | ) | |||||||
Environmental remediation charge | - | (116 | ) | |||||||
Taxation | - | 42 | ||||||||
Attributable to outside equity shareholders | - | 173 | ||||||||
Net exceptional items | 4 | 126 | (879 | ) | ||||||
Adjusted earnings | 1,382 | 1,530 | ||||||||
Dividends to shareholders | 8 | (882 | ) | (826 | ) | |||||
Retained profit/(loss) for the financial year | 626 | (175 | ) | |||||||
Earnings per ordinary share | 9 | 109.5 | c | 47.3 | c | |||||
Adjusted earnings per ordinary share | 9 | 100.3 | c | 111.2 | c | |||||
Dividends per share to Rio Tinto shareholders | 8 | |||||||||
- Rio Tinto plc | 64.0 | c | 60.0 | c | ||||||
- Rio Tinto Limited | 64.0 | c | 60.0 | c | ||||||
(a) | Diluted earnings per share figures are 0.2 US cents (2002: 0.1 US cents) lower than the earnings per share figures above. |
(b) | The results for both years relate wholly to continuing operations. |
(c) | The results for both years are stated after the exceptional items set out in the box; 'Adjusted earnings' excludes these items. |
(d) | Certain information in the financial statements, which are presented in accordance with the Companies Act and UK GAAP, would be viewed as non-GAAP under regulations issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Group has described such items in note 4, and has included a Condensed income statement in the format prescribed by the SEC. The disclosure of asset write downs in 2002 and profit on disposal of interests in subsidiary, joint venture and associate in 2003 as exceptional items is expressly permitted under FRS3 but would otherwise be prohibited within the Form 20-F. Management consider these asset write downs and this profit on disposal to be exceptional because of their nature and because large items of this type do not occur regularly. Their impact on earnings may be positive in some years and negative in others. The environmental remediation charge in 2002 is similarly presented as an exceptional item under FRS3. Management consider this charge to be exceptional in nature because large items of this type do not occur regularly. Such items do not reflect the performance of the business unit to which they relate in the particular year in which they are recognised. |
Condensed income statement (US GAAP format) Years ended 31 December
2003 | 2002 | |||||
US$m | US$m | |||||
Revenues | 9,228 | 8,443 | ||||
Operating costs and expenses | ||||||
Costs and expenses applicable to revenues (exclusive of depreciation and | ||||||
amortisation shown separately below) | (5,150 | ) | (4,337 | ) | ||
Depreciation of fixed assets and amortisation of goodwill | (1,006 | ) | (954 | ) | ||
Fixed asset write downs | - | (962 | ) | |||
Environmental remediation costs | - | (116 | ) | |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (817 | ) | (656 | ) | ||
Royalties | (439 | ) | (390 | ) | ||
Exploration, research & development | (150 | ) | (155 | ) | ||
Bad and doubtful debts | (31 | ) | (15 | ) | ||
Foreign currency exchange gain/(loss) | (123 | ) | (41 | ) | ||
Other operating expense | (16 | ) | 14 | |||
(7,732 | ) | (7,612 | ) | |||
Non operating income/(expenses) | ||||||
Gain on sale of fixed asset investments | 126 | - | ||||
Interest expense & amortisation of discount on provisions | (228 | ) | (213 | ) | ||
Income before income tax, minority interest and equity income | 1,394 | 618 | ||||
Income tax expense | (325 | ) | (483 | ) | ||
Minority interest in income of consolidated subsidiaries | (19 | ) | 48 | |||
Equity income of unconsolidated joint ventures and affiliates | 458 | 468 | ||||
Net income | 1,508 | 651 | ||||
Earnings per ordinary share | 109.5 | c | 47.3 | c |
(a) | Diluted earnings per share figures are 0.2 US cents (2002: 0.1 US cents) lower than the earnings per share figures above. |
(b) | This Condensed income statement is in the format prescribed by the SEC as referred to in note (d) to the Profit and loss account. |
82 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Cash flow statement Years ended 31 December | ||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||
Note | US$m | US$m | ||||
Cash inflow from operating activities (see below) | 2,888 | 3,134 | ||||
Dividends from joint ventures | 470 | 513 | ||||
Dividends from associates | 128 | 96 | ||||
Total cash flow from operations | 3,486 | 3,743 | ||||
Interest received | 30 | 80 | ||||
Interest paid | (231 | ) | (264 | ) | ||
Dividends paid to outside shareholders | (76 | ) | (117 | ) | ||
Returns on investment and servicing of finance | (277 | ) | (301 | ) | ||
Taxation | (917 | ) | (722 | ) | ||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (1,533 | ) | (1,296 | ) | ||
Funding of Group share of joint ventures and associates capital expenditure | (94 | ) | (137 | ) | ||
Other funding of joint ventures and associates | (18 | ) | (6 | ) | ||
Exploration and evaluation expenditure | 11 | (130 | ) | (124 | ) | |
Sale of property, plant and equipment | 19 | 16 | ||||
Net sales/(purchases) of other investments | 83 | (323 | ) | |||
Capital expenditure and financial investment | (1,673 | ) | (1,870 | ) | ||
Purchase of subsidiaries and joint arrangements | 35 | – | (106 | ) | ||
Sale of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates | 35 | 405 | 233 | |||
Disposals less acquisitions | 405 | 127 | ||||
Equity dividends paid to Rio Tinto shareholders | (833 | ) | (948 | ) | ||
Cash inflow before management of liquid resources and financing | 191 | 29 | ||||
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from management of liquid resources | 23 | (105 | ) | 213 | ||
Ordinary shares in Rio Tinto issued for cash | 25 | 15 | ||||
Ordinary shares in subsidiaries issued to outside shareholders | 8 | 22 | ||||
Loans received less repaid | 23 | (202 | ) | (409 | ) | |
Management of liquid resources and financing | (274 | ) | (159 | ) | ||
Decrease in cash | 23 | (83 | ) | (130 | ) | |
Cash flow from operating activities | ||||||
Group operating profit | 1,496 | 831 | ||||
Exceptional charges (all non cash items) | – | 1,078 | ||||
1,496 | 1,909 | |||||
Depreciation and amortisation | 2 | 1,006 | 954 | |||
Exploration and evaluation charged against profit | 11 | 127 | 130 | |||
Provisions | 20 | 154 | 58 | |||
Utilisation of provisions | 20 | (159 | ) | (118 | ) | |
Change in inventories | (43 | ) | 85 | |||
Change in accounts receivable and prepayments | 154 | 158 | ||||
Change in accounts payable and accruals | 66 | (57 | ) | |||
Other items | 87 | 15 | ||||
Cash flow from operating activities | 2,888 | 3,134 | ||||
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 83 |
Balance sheet At 31 December
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
A$m | A$m | Note | US$m | US$m | ||||||
|
||||||||||
Intangible fixed assets | ||||||||||
1,583 | 1,791 | Goodwill | 10 | 1,185 | 1,015 | |||||
92 | 101 | Exploration and evaluation | 11 | 69 | 57 | |||||
|
||||||||||
1,675 | 1,892 | 1,254 | 1,072 | |||||||
Tangible fixed assets | ||||||||||
20,294 | 21,503 | Property, plant and equipment | 12 | 15,196 | 12,183 | |||||
Investments | ||||||||||
4,318 | 5,487 | Share of gross assets of joint ventures | 13 | 3,233 | 3,109 | |||||
(1,349 | ) | (2,097 | ) | Share of gross liabilities of joint ventures | 13 | (1,010 | ) | (1,188 | ) | |
|
||||||||||
2,969 | 3,390 | 2,223 | 1,921 | |||||||
690 | 1,158 | Investments in associates/other investments | 13 | 517 | 656 | |||||
|
||||||||||
3,659 | 4,548 | Total investments | 2,740 | 2,577 | ||||||
|
||||||||||
25,628 | 27,943 | Total fixed assets | 19,190 | 15,832 | ||||||
|
||||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||||
2,381 | 2,651 | Inventories | 15 | 1,783 | 1,502 | |||||
Accounts receivable and prepayments | ||||||||||
2,236 | 2,820 | Falling due within one year | 16 | 1,674 | 1,598 | |||||
1,080 | 1,131 | Falling due after more than one year | 16 | 809 | 641 | |||||
|
||||||||||
3,316 | 3,951 | Total accounts receivable | 2,483 | 2,239 | ||||||
307 | 540 | Investments | 17 | 230 | 306 | |||||
528 | 574 | Cash | 17 | 395 | 325 | |||||
|
||||||||||
6,532 | 7,716 | Total current assets | 4,891 | 4,372 | ||||||
|
||||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||||
(2,930 | ) | (5,941 | ) | Short term borrowings | 18 | (2,194 | ) | (3,366 | ) | |
(2,858 | ) | (3,484 | ) | Accounts payable and accruals | 19 | (2,140 | ) | (1,974 | ) | |
|
||||||||||
(5,788 | ) | (9,425 | ) | Total current liabilities | (4,334 | ) | (5,340 | ) | ||
|
||||||||||
744 | (1,709 | ) | Net current assets/(liabilities) | 557 | (968 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||||
26,372 | 26,234 | Total assets less current liabilities | 19,747 | 14,864 | ||||||
Liabilities due after one year | ||||||||||
(5,140 | ) | (4,780 | ) | Medium and long term borrowings | 22 | (3,849 | ) | (2,708 | ) | |
(430 | ) | (537 | ) | Accounts payable and accruals | 19 | (322 | ) | (304 | ) | |
(6,058 | ) | (6,375 | ) | Provisions for liabilities and charges | 20 | (4,536 | ) | (3,612 | ) | |
(1,340 | ) | (1,373 | ) | Outside shareholders interests (equity) | (1,003 | ) | (778 | ) | ||
|
||||||||||
13,404 | 13,169 | Net assets | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||||||
|
||||||||||
Capital and reserves | ||||||||||
Share capital | ||||||||||
207 | 272 | Rio Tinto plc | 24 | 155 | 154 | |||||
1,449 | 1,440 | Rio Tinto Limited (excluding Rio Tinto plc interest) | 24 | 1,085 | 816 | |||||
2,176 | 2,842 | Share premium account | 25 | 1,629 | 1,610 | |||||
446 | 535 | Other reserves | 25 | 334 | 303 | |||||
9,126 | 8,080 | Profit and loss account | 25 | 6,834 | 4,579 | |||||
|
||||||||||
13,404 | 13,169 | Equity shareholders funds | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||||||
|
(a) |
The balance sheet has been translated into Australian dollars using the year end exchange rate. |
The financial statements on pages 82 to 134 were approved by the directors on 20 February 2004 and signed on their behalf by
Paul Skinner | Leigh Clifford | Guy Elliott | |
Chairman | Chief executive | Finance director | |
84 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Reconciliation with Australian GAAP 31 December
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
A$m | A$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
|
|
|||||||
2,133 | 2,818 | Adjusted earnings reported under UK GAAP | 1,382 | 1,530 | ||||
194 | (1,619 | ) | Exceptional items | 126 | (879 | ) | ||
|
|
|||||||
2,327 | 1,199 | Net earnings under UK GAAP | 1,508 | 651 | ||||
Increase/(decrease) net of tax in respect of: | ||||||||
(253 | ) | (308 | ) | Goodwill amortisation | (164 | ) | (167 | ) |
– | (35 | ) | Adjustments to asset carrying values | – | (19 | ) | ||
(8 | ) | (24 | ) | Taxation | (5 | ) | (13 | ) |
11 | 6 | Other | 7 | 3 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
2,077 | 838 | Net earnings attributable to members under Australian GAAP | 1,346 | 455 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
150.8 | c | 60.9 | c | Earnings per ordinary share under Australian GAAP | 97.7 | c | 33.1 | c |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share under Australian GAAP are 0.2 US cents (2002: 0.1 US cents) less than the above earnings per share figures.
Exceptional
Items
Net
earnings under United Kingdom generally accepted accounting principles (UK
GAAP) include exceptional gains of US$126 million. In 2002 there was an
exceptional charge, for asset write downs and environmental remediation, of
US$879 million. The concepts of Adjusted earnings and exceptional items do not
exist under Australian generally accepted accounting principles (Australian
GAAP).
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
A$m | A$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
13,404 | 13,169 | Shareholders funds under UK GAAP | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||||
Increase/(decrease) net of tax in respect of: | ||||||||
1,165 | 1,843 | Goodwill | 872 | 1,044 | ||||
92 | 131 | Taxation | 69 | 74 | ||||
626 | | Dividend | 469 | | ||||
(32 | ) | (41 | ) | Other | (24 | ) | (23 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|||||
15,255 | 15,102 | Shareholders funds under Australian GAAP | 11,423 | 8,557 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The Groups financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK GAAP, which differs in certain respects from Australian GAAP. These differences relate principally to the following items, and the effect of each of the adjustments to net earnings and shareholders funds that would be required under Australian GAAP is set out above.
Goodwill
For
1997 and prior years, UK GAAP permitted the write off of purchased goodwill
on acquisitions directly against reserves. Under Australian GAAP, goodwill
is capitalised and amortised by charges against income over the period during
which
it is expected to be of benefit, subject to a maximum of 20 years. Goodwill
previously written off directly to reserves in the UK GAAP accounts has been
reinstated and amortised for the purpose of the reconciliation statements.
For acquisitions in 1998 and subsequent years, goodwill is capitalised under UK GAAP, in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 10. Adjustments are required for Australian GAAP purposes where such capitalised goodwill is amortised over periods exceeding 20 years in the UK GAAP accounts.
Taxation
Under
UK GAAP, provision for the taxes arising on remittances of earnings can only
be made if the dividends have been accrued or if there is a binding agreement
for the distribution of the earnings. Under Australian GAAP, provision must
be made for tax arising on expected future remittances of past earnings.
Under UK GAAP, tax benefits associated with goodwill charged directly to reserves, in 1997 and previous years, must be accumulated in the deferred tax provision. This means that the tax benefits are not included in earnings until the related goodwill is charged through the profit and loss account on disposal or closure. For Australian GAAP, no provision is required for such deferred tax because the goodwill that gave rise to these tax benefits was capitalised and gives rise to amortisation charges against profit.
Proposed
dividends
Under
UK GAAP, ordinary dividends are recognised in the financial year in respect
of which they are paid. Under Australian GAAP, with effect from 1 January 2003,
such dividends are not recognised until they are declared, determined or publicly
recommended by the board of directors. Prior to 1 January 2003, Australian GAAP
was consistent with UK GAAP.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 85 |
Statement of total recognised gains and losses Years ended 31 December
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Profit for the financial year | ||||
Subsidiaries | 1,050 | 183 | ||
Joint ventures | 360 | 339 | ||
Associates | 98 | 129 | ||
1,508 | 651 | |||
Adjustment on currency translation | ||||
Subsidiaries | 1,864 | 560 | ||
Joint ventures | 53 | 13 | ||
Associates | 7 | 6 | ||
1,924 | 579 | |||
Total recognised gains and losses relating to the financial year | ||||
Subsidiaries | 2,914 | 743 | ||
Joint ventures | 413 | 352 | ||
Associates | 105 | 135 | ||
3,432 | 1,230 | |||
Reconciliation of movements in shareholders funds Years ended 31 December
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Profit for the financial year | 1,508 | 651 | ||
Dividends | (882 | ) | (826 | ) |
626 | (175 | ) | ||
Adjustment on currency translation | 1,924 | 579 | ||
Share capital issued | 25 | 15 | ||
2,575 | 419 | |||
Opening shareholders funds | 7,462 | 7,043 | ||
Closing shareholders funds | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||
86 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Outline of dual listed companies structure and basis of financial statements
The Rio Tinto Group
These are the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group (the Group),
formed through the merger of economic interests (merger) of Rio Tinto
plc and Rio Tinto Limited, and presented by both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto
Limited as their consolidated accounts in accordance with both United Kingdom
and Australian legislation and regulations.
Merger
terms On 21 December 1995, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, which are listed respectively on Stock Exchanges in the United Kingdom and Australia, entered into a dual listed companies (DLC) merger. This was effected by contractual arrangements between the companies and amendments to Rio Tinto plcs Memorandum and Articles of Association and Rio Tinto Limiteds constitution. As a result, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited and their respective groups operate together as a single economic enterprise, with neither assuming a dominant role. In particular, the arrangements: |
|
– | confer upon the shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited a common economic interest in both groups; |
– | provide for common boards of directors and a unified management structure; |
– | provide for common boards of directors and a unified management structure; |
– | provide for equalised dividends and capital distributions; and |
– | provide for the shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited to take key decisions, including the election of directors, through an electoral procedure in which the public shareholders of the two companies effectively vote on a joint basis. |
The merger involved no change in the legal ownership of any assets of Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited, nor any change in the ownership of any existing shares or securities of Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited, nor the issue of any shares, securities or payment by way of consideration, save for the issue by each company of one special voting share to a trustee company which provides the joint electoral procedure for public shareholders. During 2002, each of the parent companies issued a DLC Dividend Share to facilitate the efficient management of funds within the DLC structure.
Accounting standards
The financial statements have been drawn up in accordance with United Kingdom accounting standards. The merger of economic interests is accounted for as a merger under FRS 6.
Australian
Corporations Act The financial statements are drawn up in accordance with an order, under section 340 of the Australian Corporations Act 2001, issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) on 21 July 2003. The main provisions of the order are that the financial statements are: |
|
– | to be made out in accordance with United Kingdom requirements applicable to consolidated accounts; |
– | to be expressed in United States dollars, but may also be expressed in United Kingdom and Australian currencies; and |
– | to include a reconciliation from UK GAAP to Australian GAAP (see page 85). |
For further details of the ASIC Class Order relief see page 134.
United Kingdom Companies Act
In order to present a true and fair view of the Rio Tinto Group, in accordance with FRS 6, the principles of merger accounting have been adopted. This represents a departure from the provision of the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985 which sets out the conditions for merger accounting based on the assumption that a merger is effected through the issue of equity shares.
The main consequence of adopting merger rather than acquisition accounting is that the balance sheet of the merged group includes the assets and liabilities of Rio Tinto Limited at their carrying values prior to the merger, subject to adjustments to achieve uniformity of accounting policies, rather than at their fair values at the date of the merger. In the particular circumstances of the merger, the effect of applying acquisition accounting cannot reasonably be quantified.
In order that the financial statements should present a true and fair view, it is necessary to differ from the presentational requirements of the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985 by including amounts attributable to both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited public shareholders in the capital and reserves shown in the balance sheet and in the profit for the financial year. The Companies Act 1985 would require presentation of the capital and reserves and profit for the year attributable to Rio Tinto Limited public shareholders (set out in note 25) as a minority interest in the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group. This presentation would not give a true and fair view of the effect of the Sharing Agreement under which the position of all public shareholders is as nearly as possible the same as if they held shares in a single company.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 87 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements
1 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
a Basis of preparation
The Groups
accounting policies comply with applicable United Kingdom accounting standards
and are consistent with last year. As explained in the section headed Outline
of dual listed companies structure and basis of financial statements, the
accounting policies depart from the requirements of the Companies Act in order
to provide a true and fair view of the merger between Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto
Limited.
b Basis
of consolidation
The financial statements consist of the consolidation of the accounts of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited and their respective subsidiary undertakings (subsidiaries).
They are prepared on the historical cost basis. The Groups shares of the
assets, liabilities, earnings and reserves of associated undertakings (associates)
and joint ventures are included in the Group financial statements using the equity
and gross equity accounting methods respectively. The Group consolidates its
own share of the assets, liabilities, income and expenditure of joint arrangements
that are not entities.
c Turnover
Turnover comprises sales to third parties at invoiced amounts, with most sales being priced ex works, free on board (f.o.b.) or cost, insurance and freight (c.i.f.). A large proportion of Group production is sold under medium to long term contracts and is included in sales when deliveries are made. Gross turnover shown in the profit and loss account includes the Groups
share of the turnover of joint ventures and associates. By-product revenues are
included in turnover.
d Shipping
and handling costs
All shipping and handling costs incurred by the Group are recognised as operating costs. Amounts billed to customers in respect of shipping and handling, where the Group is responsible for the carriage, insurance and freight, are classified as revenue. If, however, the Group is acting solely as an agent, amounts billed to customers are credited to operating costs.
e Currency
translation
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate ruling at the date of transaction or, where foreign currency forward contracts have been arranged, at contractual rates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at year-end exchange rates, or at a contractual rate if applicable.
On consolidation, profit and loss account items are translated into US dollars at average rates of exchange. Balance sheet items are translated into US dollars at year end exchange rates. Certain non United States resident companies, whose functional currency is the US dollar, account in that currency.
The Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars and a significant proportion of the Groups
US dollar debt is located in subsidiaries having functional currencies other
than the US dollar. Exchange gains and losses relating to US dollar debt
impact on the profit and loss accounts of such subsidiaries. However, such
exchange gains and losses are excluded from the Groups profit and loss
account on consolidation, with a corresponding adjustment to reserves. This
means that financing in US dollars impacts in a consistent manner on the
Groups consolidated accounts irrespective of the functional currency
of the particular subsidiary where the debt is located. Exchange differences
on the translation of the net operating assets of companies with functional
currencies other than the US dollar, less offsetting exchange differences
on net debt in currencies other than the US dollar financing those net assets,
are dealt with through reserves.
All other exchange differences are charged or credited to the profit and loss account in the year in which they arise, except as set out below in note (p) relating to derivative contracts.
f Goodwill
and intangible assets
Goodwill represents the difference between the cost of acquisition and the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets arising on acquisitions after 31 December 1997 are capitalised in accordance with FRS 10. These assets are amortised over their useful economic lives, which may exceed 20 years. Amortisation is charged on a straight line or units of production basis as appropriate. In 1997 and previous years, goodwill was eliminated against reserves in the year of acquisition as a matter of accounting policy. Such goodwill was not reinstated on implementation of FRS 10; but on sale or closure of a business, any related goodwill eliminated against reserves is charged to the profit and loss account.
g Exploration
and evaluation
During the initial stage of a project, full provision is made for the costs thereof by charge against profits for the year. Expenditure on a project after it has reached a stage at which there is a high degree of confidence in its viability is carried forward and transferred to tangible fixed assets if the project proceeds. If a project does not prove viable, all irrecoverable costs associated with the project are written off. If an undeveloped project is sold, any gain or loss is included in operating profit, such transactions being a normal part of the Groups
activities. Where expenditure is carried forward in respect of a project which
may not proceed to commercial development for some time, provision is made against
the possibility of non development by charge against profits over a period of
up to seven years. When it is decided to proceed with development, any provisions
made in previous years are reversed to the extent that the relevant costs are
recoverable.
h Tangible
fixed assets
The cost of a tangible fixed asset comprises its purchase price and any costs directly attributable to bringing it into working condition for its intended use. Costs associated with a start up period are capitalised where the asset is available for use but incapable of operating at normal levels without a commissioning period. Net interest before tax payable on borrowings related to construction or development projects is capitalised until the point when substantially all the activities that are necessary to make the asset ready for use are complete.
i Mining
properties and leases
Once a mining project has been established as commercially viable, expenditure other than that on buildings, plant and equipment is capitalised under mining properties and leases together with any amount transferred from exploration and evaluation. Such expenditure is amortised against profits, applying the same principles as for other tangible fixed assets.
In open pit mining operations, it is necessary to remove overburden and other waste materials to access mineral deposits. The costs of removing waste materials are referred to as stripping
costs. During the development of a mine, before production commences,
such costs are capitalised as part of the investment in construction of the
mine.
88 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
i Mining properties and leases continued | |
Removal
of waste materials continues during the production stage of the mine. The
Group defers such production stage stripping costs where this is the most
appropriate basis for matching revenue and costs and the effect is material.
The deferral of, and subsequent charges for, these stripping costs are based
on the life
of mine stripping ratio. This ratio is calculated by dividing the
estimated total volume of production stage stripping by the estimated future
ore production over the life of the operation. The ratio is then applied
to the quantity of ore mined in the period to determine the current period
production cost charged against earnings.
|
|
j Depreciation and carrying values of fixed assets | |
Depreciation
of tangible fixed assets is calculated on a straight line or units of production
basis, as appropriate. Assets are fully depreciated over their economic lives,
or over the remaining life of the mine if shorter. Depreciation rates for the
principal assets of the Group vary from two and a half per cent to ten per cent
per annum. Tangible
and intangible fixed assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In
addition, goodwill is reviewed for impairment at the end of the first complete
financial year after the relevant acquisition and, where the goodwill is being
amortised over a period exceeding 20 years, annually thereafter. When a review
for impairment is conducted, the recoverable amount is assessed by reference
to the net present value of expected future cash flows of the relevant income
generating unit, or disposal value if higher. The discount rate applied is based
upon the Groups
weighted average cost of capital with appropriate adjustment for the risks associated
with the relevant unit. Estimates of future net cash flows are based on ore reserves
and mineral resources for which there is a high degree of confidence of economic
extraction. |
|
k Determination of ore reserves | |
Rio Tinto estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources based on information compiled by Competent Persons (as defined in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves of September 1999 (the JORC code)). Reserves and, for certain mines, resources determined in this way are used in the calculation of depreciation, amortisation, impairment and close down and restoration costs. | |
l Provisions for close down and restoration and for environmental clean up costs | |
Both
for close down and restoration and for environmental clean up costs,
provision is made in the accounting period when the related environmental
disturbance occurs, based on the net present value of estimated future
costs. The
amortisation or unwinding
of the discount applied in establishing the net present value of provisions
is charged to the profit and loss account in each accounting period. The
amortisation of the discount is shown as a financing cost rather than
as an operating cost. For close down and restoration costs, which include
the dismantling and demolition of infrastructure, removal of residual
materials and remediation of disturbed areas, movements in provisions
other than the amortisation of the discount, such as those resulting from
changes in the cost estimates, in the lives of operations or in discount
rates, are capitalised and depreciated over future production. |
|
m Inventories | |
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost for raw materials and stores is purchase price and for partly processed and saleable products is generally the cost of production, including the appropriate proportion of depreciation and overheads. Inventories are valued on a first in, first out (FIFO) basis. | |
n Deferred tax | |
Full provision is made for deferred taxation on all timing differences that have arisen but have not reversed at the balance sheet date, except in limited circumstances. The main exceptions are as follows: | |
– | Tax payable on the future remittance of the past earnings of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures is provided only to the extent that dividends have been accrued or there is a binding agreement to distribute such past earnings. |
– | Deferred tax is not recognised on revaluations of non monetary assets arising on acquisitions unless there is a binding agreement to sell the asset and the gain or loss expected to arise from the disposal has been recognised. |
– | Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be recovered. |
Provisions for deferred tax are made in respect of tax benefits related to goodwill that was charged directly to reserves on acquisitions made prior to 1998. Such provisions are released when the related goodwill is charged through the profit and loss account on disposal or closure. Deferred tax balances are not discounted to their present value. | |
o Post retirement benefits | |
In accordance with SSAP 24, the expected costs of post retirement benefits under defined benefit arrangements are charged to the profit and loss account so as to spread the costs over the service lives of employees entitled to those benefits. Variations from the regular cost are spread on a straight line basis over the expected average remaining service lives of relevant current employees. Costs are assessed in accordance with the advice of qualified actuaries. | |
p Financial instruments | |
The Groups policy with regard to Treasury management and financial instruments is set out in the Financial review. When the Group enters into derivative contracts these transactions are designed to reduce exposures related to assets and liabilities, firm commitments or anticipated transactions, and are therefore accounted for as hedges. Amounts receivable and payable in respect of interest rate swaps are recognised as an adjustment to net interest over the life of the contract. Gains or losses on foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps relating to financial assets and liabilities are matched against the losses or gains on the hedged items, either in the profit and loss account or through reserves as appropriate. Gains and losses on financial instruments relating to firm commitments or anticipated transactions for revenue items are deferred and recognised when the hedged transaction occurs. Gains and losses on financial instruments relating to firm commitments or anticipated transactions for capital expenditure are capitalised and depreciated in line with the underlying asset. The cash flows from these contracts are classified in a manner consistent with the underlying nature of the related transaction. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 89 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
2 | NET OPERATING COSTS |
2003 | 2002 | |||||
Note | US$m | US$m | ||||
Raw materials and consumables | 2,975 | 2,591 | ||||
Depreciation and amortisation (a) | 1,006 | 954 | ||||
Employment costs | 3 | 1,666 | 1,337 | |||
Royalties and other mining taxes | 439 | 390 | ||||
Decrease in inventories | 55 | 81 | ||||
Other external costs (a) | 1,451 | 1,143 | ||||
Provisions (a) | 20 | 154 | 58 | |||
Exploration and evaluation | 11 | 127 | 130 | |||
Research and development | 23 | 25 | ||||
Net exchange losses on monetary items | 123 | 41 | ||||
Costs included above qualifying for capitalisation | (168 | ) | (113 | ) | ||
Other operating income | (119 | ) | (103 | ) | ||
Net operating costs before exceptional charges | 7,732 | 6,534 | ||||
Exceptional charges (a) | | 1,078 | ||||
7,732 | 7,612 | |||||
(a) |
The above detailed analysis of 2002 costs is before exceptional charges. Including exceptional charges, the total 2002 charge for depreciation and amortisation was US$1,893 million; the charge for provisions was US$174 million and other external costs were US$1,166 million. |
(b) |
Information on Auditors remuneration is included in note 37. |
3 | EMPLOYEE COSTS |
2003 | 2002 | |||||
Note | US$m | US$m | ||||
Employment costs, excluding joint ventures and associates: | ||||||
Wages and salaries | 1,515 | 1,262 | ||||
Social security costs | 72 | 68 | ||||
Net post retirement cost (a) | 184 | 79 | ||||
1,771 | 1,409 | |||||
Less:
charged within provisions |
(105 | ) | (72 | ) | ||
1,666 | 1,337 | |||||
(a) | The net post retirement cost includes the gradual recognition under SSAP 24 of the deficits and surpluses in the Groups defined benefit pension schemes. |
(b) | UITF Abstract 17 requires the intrinsic value of share options to be recognised as a cost. However, the Groups SAYE schemes are exempt from this requirement. None of the Groups other share option schemes involves granting new options at a discount to market value. |
90 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
4 | EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS |
The exceptional items analysed at the foot of the profit and loss account are
added back in arriving at adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share.
In 2003 the exceptional gains total US$126 million, of which US$19 million related
to subsidiaries and associates and US$107 million to joint ventures. These gains
arose on sales of operations. These transactions did not give rise to a tax charge.
The
exceptional charges of US$879 million recognised in 2002 comprised provisions
of US$763 million for the impairment of asset carrying values and a charge of
US$116 million related to environmental remediation works at Kennecott Utah Copper
(KUC).
Of the impairment charge, US$480 million related to KUC and US$235 million
related to the Iron Ore Company of Canada (IOC). Of the total
charge, US$16 million before tax related to joint ventures and the remainder
to subsidiaries.
Most of the 2002 impairment provisions were calculated so as to ensure that the carrying value of the relevant assets were the same as the present value of the expected future cash flows relating to those assets. The discount rates used in calculating the present value of expected future cash flows were derived from the Groups
weighted average cost of capital, with appropriate risk adjustments. When
adjusted to include inflation and grossed up at the Groups average
tax rate for 2002, before exceptional items, the discount rate applied to
the relevant income generating units was equivalent to ten per cent, except
for gold production for which a rate equivalent to seven per cent was used.
The impairment provision against IOC aligned the carrying value with the
value negotiated between shareholders during 2002 as part of a financial
restructuring exercise.
5 | NET INTEREST PAYABLE AND SIMILAR CHARGES |
2003 | 2002 | |||||
Note | US$m | US$m | ||||
Interest payable on | ||||||
Bank borrowings | (56 | ) | (44 | ) | ||
Other loans | (153 | ) | (189 | ) | ||
(209 | ) | (233 | ) | |||
Amounts
capitalised |
39 | 22 | ||||
(170 | ) | (211 | ) | |||
Interest receivable and similar income from fixed asset investments | ||||||
Joint ventures | 8 | 10 | ||||
Associates | 5 | 1 | ||||
Other investments | 4 | 9 | ||||
17 | 20 | |||||
Other
interest receivable |
14 | 30 | ||||
31 | 50 | |||||
Group net interest payable | (139 | ) | (161 | ) | ||
Share of joint ventures net interest payable (a) | (13 | ) | (26 | ) | ||
Share of associates net interest payable (a) | (54 | ) | (50 | ) | ||
Net interest payable | (206 | ) | (237 | ) | ||
Amortisation of discount | 6 | (92 | ) | (54 | ) | |
Net interest payable and similar charges | (298 | ) | (291 | ) | ||
(a) | The Groups share of net interest payable by joint ventures and associates relates to its share of the net debt of joint ventures and associates, which is disclosed in note 14. |
6 | AMORTISATION OF DISCOUNT |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Subsidiaries | (97 | ) | (62 | ) |
Share of joint ventures | (3 | ) | (2 | ) |
(100 | ) | (64 | ) | |
Amounts capitalised (b) | 8 | 10 | ||
Amortisation of discount | (92 | ) | (54 | ) |
(a) | The amortisation of discount relates principally to provisions for close down and restoration and environmental clean up costs as explained in accounting policy 1(l). It also includes the unwinding of the discount on non-interest bearing long term accounts payable. |
(b) | Amounts capitalised relate to costs on specific projects for which operations have not yet commenced. |
Rio
Tinto 2003 Annual
report and financial statements |
91 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
7 | TAXATION CHARGE FOR THE YEAR |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
UK taxation | ||||
Corporation tax at 30% | ||||
Current | 99 | 54 | ||
Deduct: relief for overseas taxes | (96 | ) | (63 | ) |
3 | (9 | ) | ||
Deferred | (7 | ) | 12 | |
(4 | ) | 3 | ||
Australian taxation | ||||
Corporation tax at 30% | ||||
Current | 300 | 345 | ||
Deferred | 9 | 21 | ||
309 | 366 | |||
Other countries | ||||
Current | 47 | 163 | ||
Deferred | (27 | ) | (7 | ) |
20 | 156 | |||
Joint ventures charge for year (a) | 160 | 165 | ||
Associates charge for year (a) | 82 | 60 | ||
Subsidiary companies deferred tax related to exceptional charges (e) | | (42 | ) | |
567 | 708 | |||
(a) | Some tax recognised by subsidiary holding companies is presented in these accounts as part of the tax charge on the profits of the joint ventures and associates to which it relates. |
(b) |
A benefit of US$34 million was recognised in 2003 (2002: US$20 million) for operating losses that are expected to be recovered in future years. |
(c) | Adjustments of prior year accruals reduced the total tax charge by US$28 million (2002: US$16 million). |
(d) | The 2003 tax charge was reduced by US$11 million (US$8 million excluding outside shareholder interests) as a result of the proposed entry into the Australian tax consolidation regime with effect from 1 January 2003. |
(e) | The deferred tax relief on exceptional charges in 2002 primarily related to Other countries. |
(f) | A current tax charge of US$194 million (2002: charge of US$48 million) and a deferred tax charge of US$162 million (2002: charge of US$13 million), are dealt with in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses (STRGL). These tax charges relate to exchange gains and losses which are themselves dealt with in the STRGL. |
(g) | The Groups effective tax rate for 2003 is 28.8 per cent (2002: 31.2 per cent) excluding exceptional items and 27.1 per cent (2002: 54.0 per cent) including exceptional items. |
(h) | Tax paid during the year, of US$917 million, includes an amount of US$106 million relating to the disputed tax assessment from the Australian Tax Office described in note 29. The amount paid has been recorded as a receivable in these accounts because the directors believe that the relevant tax assessments are not sustainable. Tax payments also include amounts related to exchange gains on US dollar debt, which are recorded directly in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses. |
Prima facie tax reconciliation | ||||
Profit on ordinary activities before taxation | 2,094 | 1,311 | ||
Prima facie tax payable at UK and Australian rate of 30% | 628 | 393 | ||
Impact of exceptional items | (38 | ) | 328 | |
Other permanent differences | ||||
Other tax rates applicable outside the UK and Australia | 59 | 56 | ||
Permanently disallowed amortisation/depreciation | 53 | 51 | ||
Research, development and other investment allowances | (5 | ) | (7 | ) |
Resource depletion allowances | (54 | ) | (58 | ) |
Other (a) | (24 | ) | 24 | |
29 | 66 | |||
Other deferral of taxation | ||||
Capital allowances in excess of other depreciation charges | (48 | ) | (69 | ) |
Other timing differences | 14 | | ||
Total timing differences related to the current year | (34 | ) | (69 | ) |
Current taxation charge for the year | 585 | 718 | ||
Deferred tax recognised on timing differences | 34 | 27 | ||
Deferred tax impact of changes in tax rates | | (14 | ) | |
Other deferred tax items (b) | (52 | ) | (23 | ) |
Total taxation charge for the year | 567 | 708 | ||
(a) | Other impacts on the current tax charge include the benefit of reduced Alternative Minimum Tax payable in the United States. |
(b) | Other deferred tax items include benefits from adjustments of prior year accruals (see (c) above) and from Australian tax consolidation (see (d) above). |
92 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
8 | DIVIDENDS |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
|
||||
Rio Tinto plc Ordinary Interim dividend | 320 | 314 | ||
Rio Tinto plc Ordinary Final dividend | 363 | 325 | ||
Rio Tinto Limited Ordinary Interim dividend (b) | 93 | 92 | ||
Rio Tinto Limited Ordinary Final dividend (b) | 106 | 95 | ||
882 | 826 | |||
2003 | 2002 | |||
Number | Number | |||
of shares | of shares | |||
(millions) | (millions) | |||
Rio Tinto plc Interim | 1,066.1 | 1,065.4 | ||
Rio Tinto plc Final | 1,066.7 | 1,065.5 | ||
Rio Tinto Limited Interim fully franked at 30% (b) | 311.6 | 311.4 | ||
Rio Tinto Limited Final fully franked at 30% (b) | 311.6 | 311.4 | ||
(a) | The 2003 dividends have been based on the following US cents per share amounts: interim 30.0 cents, final 34.0 cents (2002: interim 29.5 cents, final 30.5 cents). |
(b) | The number of shares on which the Rio Tinto Limited dividends are based excludes those shares held by Rio Tinto plc, in order that the dividends shown represent those paid to public shareholders. |
(c) | The proposed Rio Tinto Limited dividends will be franked out of existing franking credits or out of franking credits arising from the payment of income tax during 200 |
(d) |
It is expected that Rio Tinto Limited will be forming a tax consolidated group in Australia with effect from 1 January 2003. As a consequence, franking credits of the wholly owned subsidiaries are transferred to the parent entity, Rio Tinto Limited. The approximate amount of the Rio Tinto Limited tax consolidated group retained profits and reserves that could be distributed as dividends and franked out of the existing franking credits which arose from net payments of income tax in respect of periods up to 31 December 2003 (after deducting franking credits on the proposed final dividend) is US$2,042 million. |
9 | EARNINGS PER ORDINARY SHARE | |||||
Note | 2003 | 2002 | ||||
US$m | US$m | |||||
Profit for the financial year | 1,508 | 651 | ||||
Exceptional items | 4 | (126 | ) | 879 | ||
Adjusted earnings (a) | 1,382 | 1,530 | ||||
Earnings per share | 109.5 | c | 47.3 | c | ||
Exceptional items per share | (9.2 | )c | 63.9 | c | ||
Adjusted earnings per share (a) | 100.3 | c | 111.2 | c | ||
(a) | Adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share exclude exceptional items of such magnitude that their exclusion is necessary in order that adjusted earnings fulfil their purpose of reflecting the underlying performance of the Group. |
(b) | The daily average number of ordinary shares in issue of 1,378 million (2002: 1,377 million) excludes the Rio Tinto Limited shares held by Rio Tinto plc. |
(c) | Diluted earnings per share figures are 0.2 US cents (2002: 0.1 US cents) lower than the earnings per share figures above. The daily average number of ordinary shares used for the diluted earnings per share calculation is 1,379 million (2002: 1,379 million) and excludes the Rio Tinto Limited shares held by Rio Tinto plc. The extra one million shares included in the calculation relate to unexercised share options. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 93 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
10 | GOODWILL |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Cost | ||||
At 1 January | 1,282 | 1,198 | ||
Adjustment on currency translation | 260 | 76 | ||
Additions (note 35) | 20 | 8 | ||
At 31 December | 1,562 | 1,282 | ||
Accumulated amortisation | ||||
At 1 January | (267 | ) | (176 | ) |
Adjustment on currency translation | (30 | ) | (1 | ) |
Amortisation for the year | (76 | ) | (90 | ) |
Other movements | (4 | ) | | |
At 31 December | (377 | ) | (267 | ) |
Net balance sheet amount | 1,185 | 1,015 | ||
(a) | Goodwill is being amortised over the economic lives of the relevant business units, which involves periods ranging from four to 40 years with a weighted average of around 26 years. |
11 | EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION | ||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||
US$m | US$m | ||||
At cost less amounts written off | |||||
At 1 January | 694 |
678 | |||
Adjustment on currency translation | 119 | 25 | |||
Expenditure in year | 130 | 124 | |||
Charged against profit for the year | (47 | ) | (50 | ) | |
Disposals, transfers and other movements | (62 | ) | (83 | ) | |
At 31 December | 834 | 694 | |||
Provision | |||||
At 1 January | (637 | ) | (623 | ) | |
Adjustment on currency translation | (104 | ) | (22 | ) | |
Charged against profit for the year | (80 | ) | (80 | ) | |
Disposals, transfers and other movements | 56 | 88 | |||
At 31 December | (765 | ) | (637 | ) | |
Net balance sheet amount | 69 | 57 | |||
(a) | The total of US$127 million (2002: US$130 million) charged against profit in respect of exploration and evaluation includes US$47 million (2002: US$50 million) written off cost and an increase in the provision of US$80 million (2002: US$80 million). |
94 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
12 | PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
Mining | Land | Plant | Capital | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
properties | and | and | works in | Total | Total | |||||||
and leases | buildings | equipment | progress | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Cost | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 4,002 | 2,867 | 14,567 | 1,891 | 23,327 |
20,777 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 947 | 438 | 2,480 | 408 | 4,273 | 1,261 | ||||||
Capitalisation of additional closure costs (note 20) | 167 | | | | 167 | 55 | ||||||
Other additions | 124 | 66 | 404 | 868 | 1,462 | 1,617 | ||||||
Disposals | (48 | ) | (130 | ) | (271 | ) | | (449 | ) | (548 | ) | |
Subsidiaries acquired/newly consolidated | | | 3 | | 3 | 120 | ||||||
Subsidiaries sold | (84 | ) | (10 | ) | (77 | ) | (14 | ) | (185 | ) | | |
Transfers and other movements (c) | 284 | 292 | 836 | (1,414 | ) | (2 | ) | 45 | ||||
At 31 December | 5,392 | 3,523 | 17,942 | 1,739 | 28,596 | 23,327 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | (1,076 | ) | (1,297 | ) | (8,636 | ) | (135 | ) | (11,144 | ) | (9,265 | ) |
Adjustment on currency translation | (272 | ) | (210 | ) | (1,404 | ) | | (1,886 | ) | (573 | ) | |
Depreciation for the year | (192 | ) | (110 | ) | (628 | ) | | (930 | ) | (864 | ) | |
Exceptional charges | | | | | | (939 | ) | |||||
Disposals | 47 | 123 | 249 | | 419 | 522 | ||||||
Subsidiaries acquired | | | | | | (34 | ) | |||||
Subsidiaries sold | 67 | 7 | 74 | | 148 | | ||||||
Transfers and other movements (c) | 17 | (53 | ) | 28 | 1 | (7 | ) | 9 | ||||
At 31 December | (1,409 | ) | (1,540 | ) | (10,317 | ) | (134 | ) | (13,400 | ) | (11,144 | ) |
Net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2003 | 3,983 | 1,983 | 7,625 | 1,605 | 15,196 | |||||||
Net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2002 | 2,926 | 1,570 | 5,931 | 1,756 | 12,183 | |||||||
(a) | The net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2003 includes US$243 million (2002: US$198 million) of pledged assets, in addition to assets held under the finance leases disclosed in note 22. |
(b) | The net balance sheet amount for land and buildings includes freehold US$1,921 million; long leasehold US$55 million; and short leasehold US$7 million. |
(c) | Transfers and other movements includes reclassifications between categories. |
(d) | Accumulated depreciation on Capital works in progress at 1 January 2003 related to the exceptional charge made in 2002. |
(e) | Interest is capitalised at a rate based on the Groups cost of borrowing or at the rate on project specific debt where applicable. |
(f) | During 2002, the Group acquired North Jacobs Ranch for US$380 million. Payments of US$76 million were made in each of 2002 and 2003. The remainder of the consideration, US$228 million, is payable over the next three years. |
(g) | At 31 December 2003, net tangible assets per share amounted to US$6.38 (31 December 2002: US$4.64). |
(h) | Details of deferred stripping costs, which have been included in Mining properties and leases, are set out in the following table: |
2003 | 2003 | 2003 | 2002 | 2002 | 2002 | |||||||
Sub- | Share | Total | Sub- | Share | Total | |||||||
sidiaries | of joint | sidiaries | of joint | |||||||||
ventures | ventures | |||||||||||
and | and | |||||||||||
associates | associates | |||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
restated | restated | restated | ||||||||||
Carrying values | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 326 | 198 | 524 | 292 | 175 | 467 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 17 | 3 | 20 | | | | ||||||
Net deferral of stripping costs during year | 77 | 32 | 109 | 29 | 27 | 56 | ||||||
Other | 21 | (3 | ) | 18 | 5 | (4 | ) | 1 | ||||
Deferred stripping balance carried forward at 31 December | 441 | 230 | 671 | 326 | 198 | 524 | ||||||
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 95 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
13 | FIXED ASSET INVESTMENTS |
Investments | Loans to | Investments | Loans to | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
in joint | joint | in associates | associates | Total | Total | |||||||
ventures | ventures | /other | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
At 1 January | 1,744 | 177 | 580 | 76 | 2,577 | 2,290 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 255 | 5 | 23 | | 283 | 83 | ||||||
Groups share of earnings net of distributions (excluding exceptional charges) | 15 | | (3 | ) | | 12 | 21 | |||||
Exceptional charges | | | | | | (39 | ) | |||||
Additions (excluding acquisitions) | 122 | | 13 | | 135 | 184 | ||||||
Acquisitions (note 35) | | | | | | 8 | ||||||
Disposals and repayments of advances | (78 | ) | (10 | ) | (93 | ) | (73 | ) | (254 | ) | (17 | ) |
Transfers and other movements | (7 | ) | | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | (13 | ) | 47 | ||
At 31 December | 2,051 | 172 | 515 | 2 | 2,740 | 2,577 | ||||||
(a) | The Groups investments in joint ventures and associates include, where appropriate, entry premiums on acquisition plus interest capitalised by the Group during the development period of the relevant mines. At 31 December 2003, this capitalised interest less accumulated amortisation amounted to US$12 million (2002: US$13 million). | |
(b) | In 2002, Transfers and other movements included US$55 million in relation to the revision to fair values relating to assets held for resale. | |
(c) | The cash flow statement analyses additions to joint ventures and associates between the following: | |
| Funding of Group share of joint ventures and associates capital expenditure, which reports cash supplied by the Group for the formation of new operating assets whose benefits will be attributable to the Group, and | |
| Other funding of joint ventures and associates which includes any financial investment in joint ventures and associates that does not have the above characteristics, and all loan repayments. | |
(d) | Further details of investments in joint ventures and associates are set out below and in notes 14, 32 and 33. |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Joint ventures | ||||
Rio Tintos share of assets | ||||
Fixed assets | 2,768 | 2,758 | ||
Current assets | 465 | 351 | ||
3,233 | 3,109 | |||
Rio Tintos share of third party liabilities | ||||
Liabilities due within one year | (312 | ) | (295 | ) |
Liabilities due after more than one year (including provisions) | (698 | ) | (893 | ) |
(1,010 | ) | (1,188 | ) | |
Rio Tintos share of net assets | 2,223 | 1,921 | ||
(a) | The Groups share of joint venture liabilities set out above excludes US$172 million (2002: US$177 million) due to the Group. These excluded liabilities correspond with the loans to joint ventures that are presented earlier in this note as an asset of the Group. Including these loans, the Groups share of the total liabilities of joint ventures was US$1,182 million (2002: US$1,365 million). | |
(b) | Of the US$698 million of liabilities due after more than one year, US$436 million relates to long term debt, which matures as follows: US$120 million between one to two years; US$92 million between two to three years; US$97 million between three to four years; US$111 million between four to five years and US$16 million after five years. |
96 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
13 | FIXED ASSET INVESTMENTS CONTINUED |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Associates | ||||
Rio Tintos share of assets | ||||
Fixed assets | 1,083 |
1,512 |
||
Current assets | 327 | 297 | ||
1,410 | 1,809 | |||
Rio Tintos share of third party liabilities | ||||
Liabilities due within one year | (214 | ) | (345 | ) |
Liabilities due after more than one year (including provisions) | (733 | ) | (789 | ) |
(947 | ) | (1,134 | ) | |
Non-equity capital and outside shareholders interests | (42 | ) | (105 | ) |
Rio Tintos share of net assets | 421 | 570 | ||
(a) | The Groups share of associate liabilities set out above excludes US$2 million (2002: US$76 million) due to the Group. These excluded liabilities correspond with the loans to associates that are presented earlier in this note as an asset of the Group. Including these loans, the Groups share of the total liabilities of associates was US$949 million (2002: US$1,210 million). | |
(b) | Of the US$733 million of liabilities due after more than one year, US$563 million relates to long term debt which matures as follows: US$44 million between one to two years; US$233 million between two to three years; US$38 million between three to four years; US$32 million between four to five years and US$216 million after five years. | |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Investments in and loans to associates/other | ||||
Investments in and loans to associates | 421 | 570 | ||
Other investments (a) | 96 | 86 | ||
517 | 656 | |||
(a) | Other investments include listed investments with a market value of US$92 million (2002: US$70 million). The Group owns 20.3 per cent of the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Income Fund which itself owns 15.1 per cent of Iron Ore Company of Canada Inc. Further information on the net debt of joint ventures and associates is shown in note 14. | |
14 | NET DEBT OF JOINT VENTURES AND ASSOCIATES |
Rio Tinto | Rio Tinto | Rio Tinto | Rio Tinto | |||||
percentage | share of | percentage | share of | |||||
net debt | net debt | |||||||
2003 | 2003 | 2002 | 2002 | |||||
% | US$m | % | US$m | |||||
Joint Ventures | ||||||||
Minera Escondida Limitada | 30.0 | 414 | 30.0 | 464 | ||||
P.T. Kaltim Prima Coal | | | 50.0 | 79 | ||||
Leichhardt | 44.7 | 31 | 44.7 | 40 | ||||
Colowyo | 20.0 | 32 | 20.0 | 35 | ||||
Warkworth | 42.1 | 34 | 42.1 | 26 | ||||
Associates | ||||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. | 13.1 | 236 | 16.5 | 405 | ||||
Minera Alumbrera Limited | | | 25.0 | 47 | ||||
Tisand (Pty) Limited | 50.0 | 121 | 50.0 | 62 | ||||
Port Waratah Coal Services | 27.6 | 114 | 27.6 | 103 | ||||
Sociedade Mineira de Neves-Corvo SA (Somincor) | 49.0 | 37 | 49.0 | 28 | ||||
Other | (15 | ) | 20 | |||||
1,004 | 1,309 | |||||||
(a) | In accordance with FRS 9, the Group includes its net investment in joint ventures and associates in its consolidated balance sheet. This investment is shown net of the Groups share of the net debt of joint ventures and associates due to third parties, which is set out above. | |
(b) | Some of the debt of joint ventures and associates is subject to financial and general covenants. | |
(c) | The Group holds 44.7 per cent of the equity of the Leichhardt joint venture, which has a 31.4 per cent interest in the Blair Athol joint venture. Leichhardt has US$85 million of shareholders funds and US$70 million of debt finance. | |
(d) | The debt of joint ventures and associates is without recourse to the Rio Tinto Group except that Rio Tinto has guaranteed US$6 million of its share of Somincors debt. | |
(e) | The Group has a partnership interest in the Colowyo Coal Company and has undertaken, via a subsidiary company which entered into a management agreement, to cause the partnership to perform its obligations under certain coal supply contracts. The debt of US$163 million owed by the Colowyo Coal Company is to be serviced and repaid out of the proceeds of these contracts. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 97 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued | ||||
15 INVENTORIES | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Raw materials and purchased components | 347 | 347 | ||
Consumable stores | 290 | 248 | ||
Work in progress | 382 | 245 | ||
Finished goods and goods for resale | 764 | 662 | ||
1,783 | 1,502 | |||
Comprising: | ||||
Inventories expected to be sold or used within 12 months | 1,746 | 1,463 | ||
Inventories not expected to be sold nor used within 12 months | 37 | 39 | ||
1,783 | 1,502 | |||
(a) | As reported in the Cash flow statement, the increase in inventories during 2003 was US$43 million excluding the effects of changes in exchange rates on translation into US dollars. |
16 ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE AND PREPAYMENTS |
||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Trade debtors | 1,266 | 1,176 | ||
Bills receivable | 19 | 17 | ||
Amounts owed by joint ventures | | 5 | ||
Amounts owed by associates | 4 | 17 | ||
Other debtors | 261 | 217 | ||
Current tax recoverable | 232 | 62 | ||
Deferred tax assets | 17 | 44 | ||
Pension prepayments | 620 | 634 | ||
Other prepayments | 64 | 67 | ||
2,483 | 2,239 | |||
(a) | Amounts falling due after more than one year of US$809 million (2002: US$641 million) relate to: pension prepayments US$615 million (2002: US$551 million), tax recoverable US$130 million (2002: US$10 million), other debtors US$36 million (2002: US$36 million), deferred tax assets US$17 million (2002: US$44 million), bills receivable US$6 million (2002: nil) and other prepayments US$5 million (2002: nil). |
(b) | Movements in pension prepayments are included in Other items in the cash flow. |
17 CURRENT ASSET INVESTMENTS, CASH AND LIQUID RESOURCES | |||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||
Note | US$m | US$m | |||
Liquid resources | |||||
Time deposits | 206 | 85 | |||
Other | 2 | 2 | |||
Total liquid resources | 23 | 208 | 87 | ||
Deduct: investments qualifying as cash | (206 | ) | (85 | ) | |
2 | 2 | ||||
Other current asset investments | |||||
US Treasury bonds | 228 | 304 | |||
Investments per balance sheet (unlisted) | 230 | 306 | |||
Cash | |||||
Cash as defined in FRS 1 Revised (FRS 1 cash) | 23 | 41 | 79 | ||
Add back bank borrowings repayable on demand included in FRS 1 cash | 18 | 148 | 161 | ||
Investments qualifying as cash | 206 | 85 | |||
Cash per balance sheet | 395 | 325 | |||
(a) | Current asset investments include US$228 million relating to US treasury bonds that are not regarded as liquid assets because they are held as security for the deferred consideration for certain assets acquired during 2002. |
98 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
18 |
SHORT TERM BORROWINGS |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Secured | ||||
Bank loans repayable within 12 months | 52 | 16 | ||
Other loans repayable within 12 months | 59 | 90 | ||
111 | 106 | |||
Unsecured | ||||
Bank borrowings repayable on demand | 148 | 161 | ||
Bank loans repayable within 12 months | 91 | 62 | ||
Other loans repayable within 12 months | 157 | 1,288 | ||
Commercial paper | 1,687 | 1,749 | ||
2,083 | 3,260 | |||
Total short term borrowings per balance sheet | 2,194 | 3,366 | ||
(a) | In accordance with FRS 4, all commercial paper is classified as short term borrowings although US$1,100 million of the amount outstanding at 31 December 2003 (31 December 2002: US$1,749 million) is backed by medium term facilities. Under US and Australian GAAP, the US$1,100 million would be grouped within non current borrowings at 31 December 2003. Further details of available facilities are given in note 28. |
19 | ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUALS |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Due within one year | ||||
Trade creditors | 737 | 584 | ||
Amounts owed to joint ventures | 9 | | ||
Amounts owed to associates | 44 | 23 | ||
Other creditors (a) | 226 | 202 | ||
Tax on profits | 250 | 371 | ||
Employee entitlements | 125 | 121 | ||
Royalties and mining taxes | 133 | 130 | ||
Accruals and deferred income | 123 | 109 | ||
Dividends payable to outside shareholders of subsidiaries | 1 | 4 | ||
Dividends payable to Rio Tinto shareholders | 492 | 430 | ||
2,140 | 1,974 | |||
Due in more than one year | ||||
Other creditors (a) | 194 | 276 | ||
Accruals and deferred income | 29 | 28 | ||
Tax on profits | 99 | | ||
322 | 304 | |||
(a) | Other creditors include deferred consideration of US$219 million (2002: US$287 million) relating to certain assets acquired during 2002. The deferred consideration is included at its net present value. The amortisation of the discount applied in establishing the net present value is treated as a finance cost. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 99 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued | |
20 | PROVISIONS FOR LIABILITIES AND CHARGES |
Post | Other | Close down & | Other | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
retirement | employee | restoration/ | Total | Total | ||||||||
health care | entitlements | environmental | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
At 1 January | 466 | 240 | 1,662 | 194 | 2,562 | 2,279 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 20 | 56 | 219 | 40 | 335 | 100 | ||||||
Capitalisation of additional closure costs (note 12) | | | 167 | | 167 | 55 | ||||||
Charged to profit for the year | 34 | 71 | 18 | 31 | 154 | 58 | ||||||
Exceptional charge | | | | | | 116 | ||||||
Amortisation of discount related to provisions | | | 89 | | 89 | 52 | ||||||
Utilised in year: | ||||||||||||
provisions set up on acquisition of businesses | | | | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (6 | ) | |||
other provisions | (22 | ) | (44 | ) | (48 | ) | (41 | ) | (155 | ) | (112 | ) |
Subsidiaries acquired (note 35) | | | | | | 5 | ||||||
Subsidiaries sold | | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | (7 | ) | | ||
Transfers and other movements | | 15 | (10 | ) | (8 | ) | (3 | ) | 15 | |||
498 | 337 | 2,092 | 211 | 3,138 | 2,562 | |||||||
Provision for deferred taxation (see note 21) | 1,398 | 1,050 | ||||||||||
Provisions for liabilities and charges per balance sheet | 4,536 | 3,612 | ||||||||||
(a) | The main assumptions used to determine the provision for post retirement healthcare are disclosed in note 41. The provision is expected to be utilised over the next 15 to 20 years. |
(b) | The provision for other employee entitlements includes pension entitlements of US$77 million and a provision for long service leave, based on the relevant entitlements in certain Group operations. Some US$116 million is expected to be utilised within the next year. |
(c) | The Groups policy on close down and restoration costs is shown in note 1(l). Close down and restoration costs are a normal consequence of mining, and the majority of close down and restoration expenditure is incurred at the end of the life of the mine. Remaining lives of mines and smelters range from two to over 50 years with an average, weighted by closure provision, of around 20 years. Although the ultimate cost to be incurred is uncertain, subsidiary companies have estimated their respective costs based on feasibility and engineering studies using current restoration standards and techniques Provisions of US$2,092 million for close down and restoration costs and other environmental obligations include estimates of the effect of future inflation and have been discounted to their present value at six per cent per annum, being an estimate of the risk free pre-tax cost of borrowing. Excluding the effects of future inflation, but before discounting, this is equivalent to some US$3.0 billion. |
(d) | Some US$126 million of environmental clean up expenditure is expected to take place within the next five years. The remainder includes amounts for the operation and maintenance of remediation facilities in later years. The provision for environmental expenditure includes the issue described in (e) below. |
(e) | In 1995, Kennecott Utah Copper (KUC) agreed with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Utah to complete certain source control projects and perform specific environmental studies regarding contamination of ground water in the vicinity of the Bingham Canyon mine. A remedial investigation and feasibility study on the South Zone ground water contamination, completed in March 1998, identified a range of alternative measures to address this issue. Additional studies were conducted to refine the workable alternatives. A remedial design document was completed in 2002. A joint proposal and related agreements were updated and provided to the Trustee in the third quarter of 2003. Some modifications of the original plan may be necessary in response to comments from the public. It is anticipated that formal agreement with the State of Utah Natural Resource Damage Trustee, the State of Utah and the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District will be complete in the first quarter of 2004. KUC also anticipates entering into a formal agreement with the EPA in 2004, for the remedial action on the ground water, including the acidic portion of the contamination. |
(f) | Other provisions deal with a variety of issues and include US$39 million relating to the remaining provision for the market valuation of the hedge books held by companies acquired in 2000 and 2001, which will be utilised over the next eight years (see note 28), and US$44 million relating to payments received from employees for accommodation at some sites which are refundable in certain circumstances. |
21 | DEFERRED TAXATION |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
At 1 January | 1,006 | 915 | ||
Adjustment on currency translation | 197 | 79 | ||
Reported in the STRGL | 162 | 13 | ||
Adjustment related to subsidiary sold | 6 | | ||
Credited to profit for the year on reversal of timing differences | (25 | ) | (16 | ) |
Other movements (a) | 35 | 15 | ||
1,381 | 1,006 | |||
Included in provisions for liabilities and charges | 1,398 | 1,050 | ||
Included in accounts receivable | (17 | ) | (44 | ) |
1,381 | 1,006 | |||
(a) | Other movements include deferred tax recognised by subsidiary holding companies that is presented in these accounts as part of the tax charge on the profits of the joint ventures and associates to which it relates. The amounts reported in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses relate to the provisions for tax relief on exchange differences on net debt recorded directly in reserves. |
100 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
21 | DEFERRED TAXATION CONTINUED |
UK | Australian | Other | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||
tax | tax | countries | Total | Total | ||||||
tax | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Provided in the accounts | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 12 | 311 | 1,046 | 1,369 | 1,491 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities | (134 | ) | (988 | ) | (1,628 | ) | (2,750 | ) | (2,497 | ) |
Balance as shown above | (122 | ) | (677 | ) | (582 | ) | (1,381 | ) | (1,006 | ) |
Comprising: | ||||||||||
Accelerated capital allowances | (6 | ) | (630 | ) | (938 | ) | (1,574 | ) | (1,439 | ) |
Other timing differences | (130 | ) | (66 | ) | 107 | (89 | ) | 225 | ||
Tax losses | 14 | 19 | 249 | 282 | 208 | |||||
Balance as shown above | (122 | ) | (677 | ) | (582 | ) | (1,381 | ) | (1,006 | ) |
(b) | US$380 million (2002: US$430 million) of potential deferred tax assets have not been recognised as an asset in these accounts. There is no time limit for the recovery of these potential assets. This total includes US$306 million (2002: US$366 million) of United States Alternative Minimum Tax credits and US tax losses for which recovery is dependent on the level of taxable profits in the US tax group and US$74 million (2002: US$64 million) of tax losses arising in countries other than the US. |
(c) | There is a limited time period for the recovery of US$26 million (2002: US$20 million) of tax losses which have been recognised as deferred tax assets in the accounts. |
22 | MEDIUM AND LONG TERM BORROWINGS |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
At 1 January | 5,913 | 6,252 | ||
Adjustment on currency translation | 184 | 70 | ||
Loans drawn down | 1,817 | 1,572 | ||
Loan repayments | (2,019 | ) | (1,981 | ) |
At 31 December | 5,895 | 5,913 | ||
Deduct: short term | (2,046 | ) | (3,205 | ) |
Medium and long term borrowings | 3,849 | 2,708 | ||
Borrowings at 31 December | ||||
Commercial paper | 1,687 | 1,749 | ||
Bank loans | ||||
Secured | 150 | 262 | ||
Unsecured | 435 | 203 | ||
585 | 465 | |||
Other loans | ||||
Secured | ||||
Loans | 47 | 90 | ||
Finance leases | 119 | 119 | ||
Unsecured | ||||
Rio Tinto Canada Inc 6% guaranteed bonds 2003 | | 300 | ||
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited Bonds 5.75% 2006 | 500 | 500 | ||
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited Bonds 2.625% 2008 | 600 | | ||
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited Bonds 6.5% 2003 | | 200 | ||
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited Bonds 7.125% 2013 | 100 | 100 | ||
Eurobond 2007 (b) | 781 | 716 | ||
European Medium Term Notes (b) | 837 | 1,117 | ||
North Finance (Bermuda) Limited 7% 2005 | 200 | 200 | ||
Other unsecured loans | 439 | 357 | ||
3,623 | 3,699 | |||
Total | 5,895 | 5,913 | ||
(a) | The majority of the fixed rate borrowings shown above are swapped to floating rates. Details of interest rate and currency swaps and of available standby credit facilities are shown in note 28. |
(b) | The Group has a US$3.0 billion European programme for the issuance of short to medium term debt of which US$1.6 billion was drawn down at 31 December 2003. |
(c) | In accordance with FRS 4 all commercial paper is classified as short term borrowings, although US$1,100 million outstanding at 31 December 2003 (31 December 2002: US$1,749 million) is backed by medium term facilities. Under US and Australian GAAP, the US$1,100 million would be grouped within non current borrowings at 31 December 2003. Further details of available facilities are given in note 28. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 101 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued | |||||||||||
23 NET DEBT | |||||||||||
FRS 1 cash (a) |
Borrowings | Liquid resources (a) |
2003 Net debt US$m |
2002 Net debt US$m |
|||||||
Analysis of changes in consolidated net debt | |||||||||||
At 1 January | 79 | (5,913 | ) | 87 | (5,747 | ) | (5,711 | ) | |||
Adjustment on currency translation | 45 | (184 | ) | 16 | (123 | ) | (102 | ) | |||
Per cash flow statement | (83 | ) | 202 | 105 | 224 | 66 | |||||
At 31 December | 41 | (5,895 | ) | 208 | (5,646 | ) | (5,747 | ) | |||
(a) | A reconciliation of these figures to their respective balance sheet categories is shown in note 17. | ||||||||||
2003 US$m |
2002 US$m |
||||||||||
Reconciliation of cash flow to movement in net debt | |||||||||||
Decrease in cash per cash flow statement | (83 | ) | (130 | ) | |||||||
Cash outflow from decrease in borrowings | 202 | 409 | |||||||||
Cash outflow/(inflow) from increase/(decrease) in liquid resources | 105 | (213 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease in net debt | 224 | 66 | |||||||||
Net cash flow from movement in liquid resources comprises: | |||||||||||
Increase/(decrease) in time deposits | 113 | (204 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease in certificates of deposit | – | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Increase/(decrease) in other liquid investments | (8 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Net cash outflow/(inflow) | 105 | (213 | ) | ||||||||
102 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
24 SHARE CAPITAL – RIO TINTO PLC | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
Number (m) | Number (m) | US$m | US$m | |||||
Share capital account | ||||||||
At 1 January | 1,065.48 | 1,064.59 | 154 | 154 | ||||
Ordinary shares issued | 1.19 | 0.89 | 1 | – | ||||
At 31 December | 1,066.67 | 1,065.48 | 155 | 154 | ||||
Issued and fully paid share capital | ||||||||
Special voting share of 10p (d) | 1 only | 1 only | – | – | ||||
DLC dividend share (d) | 1 only | 1 only | – | – | ||||
Ordinary shares of 10p each (equity) | 1,066.67 | 1,065.48 | 155 | 154 | ||||
Total issued share capital | 155 | 154 | ||||||
Unissued share capital | ||||||||
Ordinary shares of 10p each | 353.36 | 354.55 | 51 | 52 | ||||
Equalisation share of 10p (d) | 1 only | 1 only | – | – | ||||
Total authorised share capital | 1,420.03 | 1,420.03 | 206 | 206 | ||||
Options outstanding | ||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January | 9.34 | 7.93 | ||||||
– granted | 2.70 | 2.61 | ||||||
– exercised | (1.43 | ) | (0.89 | ) | ||||
– cancelled | (1.00 | ) | (0.31 | ) | ||||
Options outstanding at 31 December (b) | 9.61 | 9.34 | ||||||
(a) |
1,192,702 Ordinary shares were issued during the year resulting from the exercise of options under Rio Tinto plc employee share option schemes at prices between 521p and 1,061p (2002: 887,488 shares at prices between 476.99p and 1,061.0p). | |
(b) | At 31 December 2003, options over the following number of Ordinary shares were outstanding: | |
– | 23,000 under the Rio Tinto plc Executive Share Option Scheme 1985 at a price of 861p and exercisable up to April 2004 (31 December 2002: 62,000 shares at prices between 689.0p and 861.0p). | |
– | 7,662,925 under the Rio Tinto Share Option Plan 1998 at prices between 808.8p and 1,458.6p (31 December 2002: 7,186,254 shares at prices between 808.8p and 1458.6p). The exercise of share options is subject to the satisfaction of a graduated performance condition set by the Remuneration committee at various dates up to March 2013. | |
– | 1,920,430 under the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plan at prices between 521p and 1,150p and exercisable at various dates up to June 2009 (31 December 2002: 2,079,845 shares at prices between 521.0p and 1061.0p). | |
(c) |
At the 2003 annual general meeting the shareholders resolved to renew the general authority for the company to buy back up to ten per cent of its Ordinary shares of 10p each for a further period of 18 months. During the year to 31 December 2003, no shares were bought back (2002: nil). | |
(d) | The Special Voting Share was issued to facilitate the joint voting by shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited on Joint Decisions, following the DLC merger. Directors have the ability to issue an equalisation share if that is required under the terms of the DLC Merger Sharing Agreement. The DLC Dividend Share was issued to facilitate the efficient management of funds within the DLC structure. | |
(e) | The aggregate consideration received for shares issued during 2003 was US$20 million (2002: US$10 million). |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 103 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued | ||||||||
24 SHARE CAPITAL – RIO TINTO LIMITED | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
Number (m) | Number (m) | US$m | US$m | |||||
Share capital account | ||||||||
At 1 January | 311.38 | 311.02 | 816 | 732 | ||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 264 | 79 | ||||||
Share issues | 0.24 | 0.36 | 5 | 5 | ||||
At 31 December | 311.62 | 311.38 | 1,085 | 816 | ||||
Share capital held by Rio Tinto plc | 187.44 | 187.44 | ||||||
Total share capital (c) | 499.06 | 498.82 | ||||||
Options outstanding | ||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January | 4.69 | 3.08 | ||||||
– granted | 1.63 | 2.25 | ||||||
– exercised | (0.07 | ) | (0.21 | ) | ||||
– cancelled | (0.25 | ) | (0.43 | ) | ||||
Options outstanding at 31 December (d) | 6.00 | 4.69 | ||||||
(a) | 240,466 (2002: 359,821) shares were issued during the year, of which 71,563 (2002: 210,658) resulted from the exercise of options under various Rio Tinto Limited employee share option schemes at prices between A$20.37 and A$27.86 (2002: A$20.14 and A$39.30) and 168,903 (2002: 149,163) from the vesting of shares under the Rio Tinto Limited Mining Companies Comparative Plan. | |
(b) | Rio Tinto Limited is authorised by shareholder approvals obtained in 2003 to buy back up to all the Rio Tinto Limited shares held by Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc) plus, on-market, up to ten percent of the publicly held capital in any 12 month period. Rio Tinto Limited is seeking a renewal of these approvals at its annual general meeting in 2004. During the year to 31 December 2003 no shares were bought back (2002: nil). | |
(c) | Total share capital in issue at 31 December 2003 was 499.1 million shares plus one special voting share and one DLC dividend share (31 December 2002: 498.8 million shares plus one special voting share and one DLC Dividend Share). The Special Voting Share was issued to facilitate the joint voting by shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited on Joint Decisions following the DLC merger. Directors have the ability to issue an equalisation share if that is required under the terms of the DLC Merger Sharing Agreement. The DLC Dividend Share was issued to facilitate the efficient management of funds within the DLC structure. | |
(d) | At 31 December 2003, options over the following number of shares were outstanding: | |
– | 3,602,137 shares under the Rio Tinto Share Option Plan at prices between A$20.14 and A$39.87 (31 December 2002: 2,439,330 shares at prices between A$20.14 and A$39.87). These share options are exercisable at various dates up to March 2013, subject to the satisfaction of a graduated performance condition set by the Remuneration committee. | |
– | 2,385,453 shares under the Rio Tinto Limited Share Savings Plan at prices between A$25.57 and A$27.86 (31 December 2002: 2,246,174 at prices between A$25.57 and A$27.86). These share options are exercisable at various dates up to June 2009. | |
(e) | The aggregate consideration received for shares issued during 2003 was US$5 million (2002: US$5 million). |
104 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
25 | SHARE PREMIUM AND RESERVES |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Share Premium account | ||||
At 1 January | 1,610 | 1,600 | ||
Premium on issues of ordinary shares | 19 | 10 | ||
At 31 December | 1,629 | 1,610 | ||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Parent and subsidiary companies profit and loss account | ||||
At 1 January | 3,968 | 3,676 | ||
Adjustment on currency translation (b) | 1,569 | 472 | ||
Retained profit/(loss) for the year | 614 | (180 | ) | |
Transfers and other movements (c) | 115 | | ||
At 31 December | 6,266 | 3,968 | ||
Joint ventures profit and loss account | ||||
At 1 January | 504 | 531 | ||
Adjustment on currency translation (b) | 53 | 13 | ||
Retained profit/(loss) for the year | 15 | (40 | ) | |
Transfers and other movements (c) | (46 | ) | | |
At 31 December | 526 | 504 | ||
Associates profit and loss account | ||||
At 1 January | 107 | 56 | ||
Adjustment on currency translation (b) | 7 | 6 | ||
Retained (loss)/profit for the year | (3 | ) | 45 | |
Transfers and other movements (c) | (69 | ) | | |
At 31 December | 42 | 107 | ||
Total profit and loss account | 6,834 | 4,579 | ||
Other reserves | ||||
At 1 January | 303 | 294 | ||
Adjustment on currency translation (b) | 31 | 9 | ||
At 31 December | 334 | 303 | ||
Total reserves | ||||
Parent and subsidiary companies | 6,585 | 4,256 | ||
Joint ventures | 526 | 504 | ||
Associated companies | 57 | 122 | ||
7,168 | 4,882 | |||
(a) | A substantial portion of Group reserves are in overseas companies. If these reserves were distributed, there would be a liability to withholding taxes and to corporate tax in the UK and Australia. This would, however, be reduced by double taxation relief. Provision is made in these accounts for such additional tax only to the extent that dividends have been accrued or there is a binding agreement to distribute such past earnings. |
(b) | Adjustments on currency translation include net of tax exchange gains on net debt of US$715 million (2002: gains of US$211 million). |
(c) | Transfers and other movements primarily relate to the disposal of a subsidiary, joint venture and associate during 2003. |
(d) | At 31 December 2003, cumulative goodwill written off directly to reserves amounted to US$3,142 million (2002: US$3,087 million). |
Amounts attributable to Rio Tinto Limited public shareholders
The consolidated shareholders funds of the DLC include US$2,270 million (2002: US$1,688 million) and profit for the financial year includes US$341 million (2002: US$147 million) attributable to the economic interests of shareholders in Rio Tinto Limited other than Rio Tinto plc.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 105 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
26 | PRODUCT ANALYSIS |
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
% | % | US$m | US$m | |||||
Operating assets (b) | ||||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 18.2 | 23.0 | 2,877 | 3,109 | ||||
Iron ore | 25.0 | 20.7 | 3,951 | 2,803 | ||||
Coal | 14.1 | 13.9 | 2,234 | 1,879 | ||||
Aluminium | 20.6 | 17.5 | 3,261 | 2,365 | ||||
Industrial minerals | 12.9 | 15.5 | 2,044 | 2,100 | ||||
Diamonds | 8.0 | 7.1 | 1,261 | 968 | ||||
Other products | 1.2 | 2.3 | 181 | 320 | ||||
Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 15,809 | 13,544 | ||||
Unallocated items | (126 | ) | (335 | ) | ||||
Less: net debt | (5,646 | ) | (5,747 | ) | ||||
Net assets | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||||||
Gross turnover | ||||||||
Copper | 12.7 | 12.4 | 1,495 | 1,348 | ||||
Gold (all sources) | 9.1 | 9.7 | 1,068 | 1,046 | ||||
Iron ore | 18.4 | 16.4 | 2,165 | 1,772 | ||||
Coal | 18.1 | 20.3 | 2,125 | 2,203 | ||||
Aluminium | 15.7 | 15.4 | 1,847 | 1,663 | ||||
Industrial minerals | 15.7 | 17.5 | 1,849 | 1,898 | ||||
Diamonds | 4.7 | 3.4 | 556 | 372 | ||||
Other products | 5.6 | 4.9 | 650 | 526 | ||||
Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 11,755 | 10,828 | ||||
Profit before tax | ||||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 27.3 | 19.0 | 680 | 536 | ||||
Iron ore | 30.1 | 24.2 | 748 | 680 | ||||
Coal | 10.2 | 18.5 | 255 | 520 | ||||
Aluminium | 11.5 | 13.0 | 287 | 365 | ||||
Industrial minerals | 11.5 | 19.9 | 286 | 559 | ||||
Diamonds | 7.5 | 3.4 | 187 | 96 | ||||
Other products | 1.9 | 2.0 | 46 | 58 | ||||
100.0 | 100.0 | 2,489 | 2,814 | |||||
Exploration and evaluation | (127 | ) | (130 | ) | ||||
Net interest (d) | (139 | ) | (161 | ) | ||||
Other items | (255 | ) | (118 | ) | ||||
1,968 | 2,405 | |||||||
Exceptional items (e) | 126 | (1,094 | ) | |||||
Total | 2,094 | 1,311 | ||||||
Net earnings | ||||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 27.1 | 20.8 | 429 | 369 | ||||
Iron ore | 31.6 | 25.6 | 500 | 455 | ||||
Coal | 10.3 | 17.9 | 163 | 318 | ||||
Aluminium | 11.9 | 14.5 | 189 | 257 | ||||
Industrial minerals | 10.0 | 16.4 | 159 | 292 | ||||
Diamonds | 7.0 | 3.5 | 111 | 63 | ||||
Other products | 2.1 | 1.3 | 33 | 22 | ||||
100.0 | 100.0 | 1,584 | 1,776 | |||||
Exploration and evaluation | (98 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||
Net interest (d) | (59 | ) | (95 | ) | ||||
Other items | (45 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
1,382 | 1,530 | |||||||
Exceptional items (e) | 126 | (879 | ) | |||||
Total | 1,508 | 651 | ||||||
(a) | In 2003, the way in which post retirement costs are attributed to business units, and consequently product groups, has been revised. The regular cost component of post retirement costs is included in business unit earnings and the balance of post retirement cost is recognised centrally in other items. The analyses of 2002 Operating assets, Profit before tax and Net earnings have been restated to reflect this allocation. There was no impact on Net earnings, Profit before tax or Operating assets for the Group. |
(b) | Operating assets of subsidiaries comprise net assets before deducting net debt, less outside shareholders interests which are calculated by reference to the net assets of the relevant companies (ie net of such companies debt). For joint ventures and associates, Rio Tintos net investment is shown. |
(c) | The above analyses include Rio Tintos shares of the results of joint ventures and associates including interest. |
(d) | The amortisation of discount is included in the applicable product category. All other financing costs of subsidiaries are shown as Net interest. |
(e) |
Of the exceptional charges in 2002, US$596 million before and after tax relates to Kennecott Utah Copper which is part of the copper, gold and by-products segment and US$443 million before tax (US$235 million after tax and minorities) relates to the Iron Ore Company of Canada which is part of the iron ore segment. Exceptional charges are shown separately in the above analysis of Profit before tax and Net earnings. |
106 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
26 | PRODUCT ANALYSIS CONTINUED |
The Group figures on page 106 include the following amounts for joint ventures: |
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Net investment | ||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 1,072 | 1,027 | ||
Coal | 1,080 | 828 | ||
Other | 71 | 66 | ||
Total | 2,223 | 1,921 | ||
Gross turnover | ||||
Copper | 625 | 419 | ||
Gold | 283 | 236 | ||
Coal | 836 | 956 | ||
Other | 76 | 51 | ||
Total | 1,820 | 1,662 | ||
Profit before tax | ||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 378 | 232 | ||
Coal | 139 | 285 | ||
Other | 3 | 3 | ||
520 | 520 | |||
Exceptional items | | (16 | ) | |
Total | 520 | 504 | ||
Net earnings | ||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 256 | 155 | ||
Coal | 102 | 198 | ||
Other | 2 | 2 | ||
360 | 355 | |||
Exceptional items | | (16 | ) | |
Total | 360 | 339 | ||
The Group figures on page 106 include the following amounts for associates: | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Net investment | ||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 362 | 505 | ||
Other | 59 | 65 | ||
Total | 421 | 570 | ||
Gross turnover | ||||
Copper | 185 | 259 | ||
Gold | 411 | 355 | ||
Other | 111 | 109 | ||
Total | 707 | 723 | ||
Profit before tax | ||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 147 | 130 | ||
Other | 33 | 59 | ||
Total | 180 | 189 | ||
Net earnings | ||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 77 | 93 | ||
Other | 21 | 36 | ||
Total | 98 | 129 | ||
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 107 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued | ||||||||
27 GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS | ||||||||
By location | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
% | % | US$m | US$m | |||||
Operating assets | ||||||||
North America | 30.7 | 36.5 | 4,846 | 4,949 | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 55.7 | 47.6 | 8,799 | 6,446 | ||||
South America | 4.1 | 5.2 | 652 | 703 | ||||
Africa | 3.6 | 3.5 | 577 | 477 | ||||
Indonesia | 3.5 | 4.4 | 554 | 599 | ||||
Europe and other countries | 2.4 | 2.8 | 381 | 370 | ||||
Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 15,809 | 13,544 | ||||
Unallocated items | (126 | ) | (335 | ) | ||||
Less: net debt | (5,646 | ) | (5,747 | ) | ||||
Net assets | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||||||
Turnover by country of origin | ||||||||
North America | 30.3 | 31.2 | 3,567 | 3,377 | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 43.8 | 41.6 | 5,152 | 4,500 | ||||
South America | 5.8 | 4.8 | 682 | 525 | ||||
Africa | 5.6 | 7.2 | 662 | 783 | ||||
Indonesia | 8.8 | 9.6 | 1,037 | 1,039 | ||||
Europe and other countries | 5.7 | 5.6 | 655 | 604 | ||||
Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 11,755 | 10,828 | ||||
Profit before tax | ||||||||
North America | 18.9 | 17.1 | 399 | 439 | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 53.7 | 57.1 | 1,131 | 1,464 | ||||
South America | 11.1 | 3.4 | 234 | 86 | ||||
Africa | 3.1 | 11.8 | 65 | 303 | ||||
Indonesia | 16.5 | 12.2 | 348 | 312 | ||||
Europe and other countries | (3.3 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (70 | ) | (38 | ) |
100.0 | 100.0 | 2,107 | 2,566 | |||||
Net interest (c) | (139 | ) | (161 | ) | ||||
1,968 | 2,405 | |||||||
Exceptional items (d) | 126 | (1,094 | ) | |||||
Total | 2,094 | 1,311 | ||||||
Net earnings | ||||||||
North America | 25.2 | 20.1 | 363 | 326 | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 52.3 | 57.8 | 754 | 939 | ||||
South America | 10.8 | 4.0 | 156 | 65 | ||||
Africa | 0.8 | 7.1 | 12 | 115 | ||||
Indonesia | 12.6 | 11.4 | 181 | 185 | ||||
Europe and other countries | (1.7 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (25 | ) | (5 | ) |
100.0 | 100.0 | 1,441 | 1,625 | |||||
Net interest (c) | (59 | ) | (95 | ) | ||||
1,382 | 1,530 | |||||||
Exceptional items (d) | 126 | (879 | ) | |||||
Total | 1,508 | 651 | ||||||
(a) | Operating assets of subsidiaries comprise net assets before deducting net debt, less outside shareholders interests which are calculated by reference to the net assets of the relevant companies (ie net of such companies debt). For joint ventures and associates, Rio Tintos net investment is shown. |
(b) | The above analyses include the Rio Tinto share of the results of joint ventures and associates including interest. |
(c) | The amortisation of discount is included in the applicable geographical category. All other financing costs of subsidiaries are shown as Net interest. |
(d) | The exceptional items in 2003 relate to the profit on disposal of interests in a subsidiary, joint venture and associate. Of the exceptional charges in 2002, US$596 million before tax related to Kennecott Utah Copper and US$443 million before tax related to the Iron Ore Company of Canada. Both of these businesses are included in North America. Exceptional items are shown separately in the above analysis of the profit before tax and net earnings. |
108 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
27 GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS CONTINUED | ||||
By location | ||||
The Group figures shown on page 108 include the following amounts for joint ventures: | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Net investment | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 1,108 | 834 | ||
South America | 552 | 498 | ||
Indonesia | 523 | 567 | ||
Other | 40 | 22 | ||
Total | 2,223 | 1,921 | ||
Turnover by country of origin | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 550 | 587 | ||
South America | 502 | 283 | ||
Indonesia | 539 | 565 | ||
Other | 229 | 227 | ||
Total | 1,820 | 1,662 | ||
Profit before tax | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 57 | 214 | ||
South America | 183 | 49 | ||
Indonesia | 241 | 231 | ||
Other | 39 | 26 | ||
520 | 520 | |||
Exceptional items | | (16 | ) | |
Total | 520 | 504 | ||
Net earnings | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 46 | 151 | ||
South America | 122 | 32 | ||
Indonesia | 155 | 149 | ||
Other | 37 | 23 | ||
360 | 355 | |||
Exceptional items | | (16 | ) | |
Total | 360 | 339 | ||
By location | ||||
The Group figures shown on page 108 include the following amounts for associates: | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Net investment | ||||
North America | 53 | 71 | ||
Indonesia | 143 | 127 | ||
Other | 225 | 372 | ||
Total | 421 | 570 | ||
Turnover by country of origin | ||||
North America | 155 | 131 | ||
Indonesia | 344 | 306 | ||
Other | 208 | 286 | ||
Total | 707 | 723 | ||
Profit before tax | ||||
North America | 67 | 42 | ||
Indonesia | 72 | 54 | ||
Other | 41 | 93 | ||
Total | 180 | 189 | ||
Net earnings | ||||
North America | 49 | 33 | ||
Indonesia | 23 | 19 | ||
Other | 26 | 77 | ||
Total | 98 | 129 | ||
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 109 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued | ||||||||
27 GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS CONTINUED | ||||||||
By destination | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
% | % | US$m | US$m | |||||
Turnover by destination | ||||||||
North America | 25.7 | 29.0 | 3,024 | 3,143 | ||||
Europe | 23.3 | 21.6 | 2,742 | 2,340 | ||||
Japan | 18.0 | 17.9 | 2,119 | 1,943 | ||||
Other Asia | 21.5 | 19.2 | 2,527 | 2,083 | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 7.2 | 8.2 | 845 | 887 | ||||
Other | 4.3 | 4.1 | 498 | 432 | ||||
Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 11,755 | 10,828 | ||||
The Group figures shown above include the following amounts for joint ventures: | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
US$m | US$m | |||||||
Turnover by destination | ||||||||
North America | 191 | 214 | ||||||
Europe | 300 | 303 | ||||||
Japan | 543 | 575 | ||||||
Other | 786 | 570 | ||||||
Total | 1,820 | 1,662 | ||||||
The Group figures shown above include the following amounts for associates: | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
US$m | US$m | |||||||
Turnover by destination | ||||||||
North America | 172 | 157 | ||||||
Europe | 220 | 248 | ||||||
Other | 315 | 318 | ||||||
Total | 707 | 723 | ||||||
110 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
28 | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
The Groups policies with regard to currency, interest rate and commodity price exposures, and the use of derivative financial instruments, are discussed in the following sections on pages 34 and 35 of the Financial review: | |
A | Exchange rates, reporting currencies and currency exposure |
B | Interest rates |
C | Commodity prices |
D | Treasury management and financial instruments |
Except where stated, the information given below relates to the financial instruments of the parent companies and their subsidiaries and excludes joint ventures and associates. The information provided is as at the end of the financial year. Short term debtors and creditors are included only in the currency analysis.
Financial instruments held by companies acquired are marked to market as part of the adjustment of assets and liabilities acquired to fair value. Where appropriate, these fair value adjustments, calculated on a basis consistent with that disclosed in Section E, are shown in the disclosures below.
A) | Currency |
The Groups material currency derivatives are itemised below: | |
a) | Forward contracts hedging trading transactions |
Buy | Sell | Weighted | Fair value | Total | ||||||
currency | currency | average | fair | |||||||
amount | amount | exchange | value | |||||||
rate | ||||||||||
Buy Australian dollar: sell US dollar | A$m | US$m | A$/US$ | US$m | US$m | |||||
Less than 1 year | 257 | 156 | 0.61 | 32 | ||||||
1 to 5 years | 657 | 399 | 0.61 | 56 | ||||||
More than 5 years | 111 | 67 | 0.60 | 7 | ||||||
Total | 1,025 | 622 | 0.61 | 95 |
Of the above, contracts to sell US$540 million were acquired with companies purchased in 2000 and 2001 and US$62 million were entered into by Comalco before it became a wholly owned subsidiary.
Buy New Zealand dollar: sell US dollar | NZ$m | US$m | NZ$/US$ | US$m | ||||||
Less than 1 year | 130 | 65 | 0.50 | 19 | ||||||
1 to 5 years | 485 | 220 | 0.45 | 69 | ||||||
More than 5 years | 260 | 117 | 0.45 | 29 | ||||||
Total | 875 | 402 | 0.46 | 117 | ||||||
Buy Canadian dollar: sell US dollar (all of which were acquired with companies purchased in 2000) | C$m | US$m | C$/US$ | US$m | ||||||
Less than 1 year | 18 | 12 | 0.68 | 2 | 2 | |||||
Other currency forward contracts | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Total fair value | 207 | |||||||||
Adjust: Fair value recognised in respect of these contracts (of which US$14m was recognised on acquisition) | 22 | |||||||||
Fair value not recognised | 229 | |||||||||
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 111 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued | |
28 | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CONTINUED |
b) | Options hedging trading transactions |
The Group acquired a series of bought call options with companies purchased in 2000. The majority of these bought call options are matched at 31 December 2003 by sold puts. The combination of these instruments has a similar effect to forward contracts. In the event that the Australian dollar strengthens above pre-determined levels, the put options are knocked out ie cancelled. During 2003, US$57 million of these sold puts were knocked out and the remainder were knocked out in January 2004. | |
Buy | Sell | Weighted | Fair | Total | ||||||
currency | currency | average | value | fair | ||||||
amount | amount | strike | value | |||||||
rate | ||||||||||
Bought A$ call options | A$m | US$m | A$/US$ | US$m | US$m | |||||
Less than 1 year | 94 | 66 | 0.70 | 4 | ||||||
1 to 5 years | 340 | 239 | 0.70 | 13 | ||||||
Total | 434 | 305 | 0.70 | 17 |
As noted above, the following sold A$ put options which were outstanding at 31 December 2003, automatically expired when the Australian dollar strengthened above the pre-determined barrier rate in early January 2004. Details are shown below:
Buy | Sell | Weighted | Weighted | Fair | |||||||||
currency | currency | average | average | value | |||||||||
amount | amount | strike rate | barrier | ||||||||||
rate | |||||||||||||
Sold knock out A$ put options | A$m | US$m | A$/US$ | A$/US$ | US$m | ||||||||
Less than 1 year | 76 | 54 | 0.70 | 0.77 | (1 | ) | |||||||
1 to 5 years | 275 | 194 | 0.70 | 0.77 | (6 | ) | |||||||
Total | 351 | 248 | 0.70 | 0.77 | (7 | ) | |||||||
Total fair value | 10 | ||||||||||||
Adjust: Fair value recognised on acquisition in respect of these contracts | 27 | ||||||||||||
Fair value not recognised | 37 | ||||||||||||
c) | Forward contracts hedging future capital expenditure | ||||||||||||
Buy | Sell | Weighted | Fair | Total | |||||||||
currency | currency | average | value | fair | |||||||||
amount | amount | exchange | value | ||||||||||
rate | |||||||||||||
Buy Australian dollar: sell US dollar | A$m | US$m | A$/US$ | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Less than 1 year | 393 | 198 | 0.50 | 93 | |||||||||
Fair value not recognised | 93 | ||||||||||||
d) | Currency swaps hedging non US dollar debt | ||||||||||||
Buy Euro: sell US dollars | Buy | Sell | Weighted | Fair | Total | ||||||||
currency | currency | average | value (a) | fair | |||||||||
amount | amount | exchange | value | ||||||||||
US$m | rate | US$m | |||||||||||
Less than myear | Euro 40m | 46 | 0.88 | 5 | |||||||||
1 to 5 years | Euro 975m | 934 | 1.04 | 292 | |||||||||
980 | 1.04 | 297 | |||||||||||
Buy Japanese yen: sell US dollars | |||||||||||||
1 to 5 years | Yen 21 billion | 177 | 119 | 20 | |||||||||
Buy sterling: sell US dollars | |||||||||||||
1 to 5 years | £175 | m | 251 | 0.70 | 61 | ||||||||
Buy Swiss francs: sell US dollars | |||||||||||||
1 to 5 years | CHF70 | m | 48 | 1.47 | 9 | ||||||||
Total currency swaps | 1,456 | 387 | |||||||||||
Fair value recognised within carrying value of debt | (387 | ) | |||||||||||
Fair value not recognised | | ||||||||||||
(a) | These fair values comprise only the currency element of the swaps. The fair value of the interest element is presented in the summary of interest rate swaps. |
112 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
28 | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CONTINUED |
e) | Currency exposures arising from the Groups net monetary assets/(liabilities) |
After taking into account the effect of relevant derivative instruments, almost all the Groups net debt is either denominated in US dollars or in the functional currency of the entity holding the debt. The table below sets out the currency exposures arising from net monetary assets/(liabilities), other than net debt, which are not denominated in the functional currency of the relevant business unit. Gains and losses resulting from such exposures are recorded in the profit and loss account. This table reflects the currency exposures before adjusting for tax and outside interests. | |
Currency of exposure | Currency of exposure | |||||||||||
United | Other | 2003 | United | Other | 2002 | |||||||
States | currencies | Total | States | currencies | Total | |||||||
dollar | dollar | |||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Functional currency of business unit: | ||||||||||||
United States dollar | | 30 | 30 | | 32 | 32 | ||||||
Australian dollar | 385 | (16 | ) | 369 | 346 | 35 | 381 | |||||
Canadian dollar | 51 | (1 | ) | 50 | 56 | | 56 | |||||
South African rand | 47 | 6 | 53 | 105 | 26 | 131 | ||||||
Other currencies | 20 | 15 | 35 | 28 | (1 | ) | 27 | |||||
Total | 503 | 34 | 537 | 535 | 92 | 627 | ||||||
The table below shows the Rio Tinto share of the above currency exposures after tax and outside interests: | ||||||||||||
Currency of exposure | Currency of exposure | |||||||||||
United | Other | 2003 | United | Other | 2002 | |||||||
States | currencies | Total | States | currencies | Total | |||||||
dollar | dollar | |||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Functional currency of business unit: | ||||||||||||
United States dollar | | 20 | 20 | | 22 | 22 | ||||||
Australian dollar | 251 | (11 | ) | 240 | 224 | 24 | 248 | |||||
Canadian dollar | 19 | (1 | ) | 18 | 21 | | 21 | |||||
South African rand | 16 | 2 | 18 | 37 | 9 | |||||||
Other currencies | 14 | 9 | 23 | 17 | (1 | ) | 16 | |||||
Total | 300 | 19 | 319 | 299 | 54 | 353 | ||||||
B) | Interest rates |
(i) | Financial liabilities and assets including the effect of interest rate and currency swaps |
This table analyses the currency and interest rate composition of the Groups financial assets and liabilities: | |
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
United | Australian | Sterling | South | Other | Total | Total | ||||||||
States | dollar | African | currencies | carrying | carrying | |||||||||
dollar | rand | value | value | |||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Financial liabilities (f) | ||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | (721 | ) | | | | | (721 | ) | (685 | ) | ||||
Floating rate | (4,661 | ) | (339 | ) | (15 | ) | (233 | ) | (74 | ) | (5,322 | ) | (5,389 | ) |
Non interest bearing (g) | (219 | ) | | | | | (219 | ) | (287 | ) | ||||
(5,601 | ) | (339 | ) | (15 | ) | (233 | ) | (74 | ) | (6,262 | ) | (6,361 | ) | |
Financial assets (f) | ||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | 239 | | | | | 239 | 304 | |||||||
Floating rate (including loans to joint ventures and associates) |
368 | 92 | 21 | 3 | 571 | 580 | ||||||||
(4,994 | ) | (247 | ) | 6 | (230 | ) | 13 | (5,452 | ) | (5,477 | ) | |||
Adjusted to exclude: | ||||||||||||||
US Treasury bonds (fixed rate) | (239 | ) | (304 | ) | ||||||||||
Deferred consideration payable (non interest bearing) |
219 | 287 | ||||||||||||
Loans to joint ventures and associates (floating rate) | (174 | ) | (253 | ) | ||||||||||
Net debt (note 23) | (5,646 | ) | (5,747 | ) | ||||||||||
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 113 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
28 | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CONTINUED |
(ii) |
Fixed rate liabilities and assets, presented gross, and interest rate and currency swaps |
The US$721 million (2002: US$685 million) of fixed rate liabilities shown in (i) above comprise the gross liabilities of US$2,716 million (2002: US$2,539 million) less the interest rate and currency swaps of US$1,995 million (2002: US$1,854 million) below: |
Gross liabilities | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Principal | Average | Excess of | Principal | Average | Excess of | |||||||
fixed | fair value | fixed | fair value | |||||||||
rate | over | rate | over | |||||||||
principal | principal | |||||||||||
Maturity | US$m | % p.a. | US$m | US$m | % p.a. | US$m | ||||||
Less than 1 year | – | – | – | 621 | 5.4 | (17 | ) | |||||
1 to 5 years | 1,350 | 4.6 | (33 | ) | 750 | 6.1 | (66 | ) | ||||
More than 5 years | 100 | 7.2 | (17 | ) | 100 | 7.2 | (18 | ) | ||||
US$ fixed rate liabilities | 1,450 | 4.8 | (50 | ) | 1,471 | 5.9 | (101 | ) | ||||
Less than 1 year | 46 | 2.3 | – | – |
– | – |
||||||
1 to 5 years | 1,220 | 4.5 | (62 | ) | 1,068 | 4.7 | (46 | ) | ||||
Non US dollar fixed rate liabilities (a) | 1,266 | 4.4 | (62 | ) | 1,068 | 4.7 | (46 | ) | ||||
Fixed rate liabilities before interest rate swaps | 2,716 | (112 | ) | 2,539 | (147 | ) | ||||||
Interest rate swaps | Principal | Average | 2003 | Principal | Average | 2002 | ||||||
fixed | Fair | fixed | Fair | |||||||||
rate | value(i) | rate | value | |||||||||
Maturity | US$m | % p.a. | US$m | US$m | % p.a. | US$m | ||||||
Less than 1 year | – | – | – | 321 | 4.7 | 9 | ||||||
1 to 5 years | 1,050 | 5.1 | 41 | 750 | 6.1 | 74 | ||||||
Interest rate swaps to US$ floating rates | 1,050 | 5.1 | 41 | 1,071 | 5.7 | 83 | ||||||
Less than 1 year | 46 | 2.3 | – | – |
– | – |
||||||
1 to 5 years | 1,220 | 4.5 | 55 | 1,068 | 4.7 | 48 | ||||||
Interest rate swaps from non US$ fixed rates to US$ floating rates (a) | 1,266 | 4.4 | 55 | 1,068 | 4.7 | 48 | ||||||
Less than 1 year | 20 | 7.5 | (1 | ) | – |
– | – |
|||||
1 to 5 years | 225 | 7.0 | (19 | ) | 245 | 7.1 | (28 | ) | ||||
More than 5 years | 76 | 5.6 | (8 | ) | 40 | 5.6 | (9 | ) | ||||
Interest rate swaps to US$ fixed rates (b) | 321 | 6.7 | (28 | ) | 285 | 6.9 | (37 | ) | ||||
Interest rate swaps (net impact) | 1,995 | 68 | 1,854 | 94 | ||||||||
Total fixed rate financial liabilities after interest rate swaps (b), (d) | 721 | (44 | ) | 685 | (53 | ) | ||||||
(i) These fair values include the interest element of the currency swaps described earlier. | ||||||||||||
Gross assets | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Principal | Average | Excess of | Principal | Average | Excess of | |||||||
fixed | fair value | fixed | fair value | |||||||||
rate | over | rate | over | |||||||||
principal | principal | |||||||||||
US$m | % p.a. | US$m | US$m | % p.a. | US$m | |||||||
Less than 1 year | 239 | 1.0 | (1 | ) | 304 | 1.7 | 4 | |||||
Total fixed rate financial assets | 239 | 1.0 | (1 | ) | 304 | 1.7 | 4 | |||||
(a) | All of the above non US$ liabilities are swapped to US$. The principal amounts shown above reflect the currency element of the related currency swaps. |
(b) | As a consequence of acquisitions during 2000, the Group holds a number of interest rate swaps to receive US$ floating rates and pay US$ fixed rates which have been included in the total of fixed rate debt shown above. |
(c) | The Group has US$119 million of finance leases (2002: US$119 million), the largest of which has a principal of US$85 million, a maturity of 2018 and a floating interest rate. |
(d) | After taking into account all interest rate swaps, the Groups fixed rate debt totals US$721 million and has a weighted average interest rate of 5.1 per cent and a weighted average time to maturity of four years (2002: US$685 million with a weighted average interest rate of 6.6 per cent and a weighted average time to maturity of three years). |
(e) | Interest rates on the great majority of the Groups floating rate financial liabilities and assets will have been reset within six months. The interest rates applicable to the Groups US dollar denominated floating rate financial liabilities and assets did not differ materially at the year end from the three month US dollar LIBOR rate of 1.2 per cent. |
(f) | The above table does not include the remaining US$39 million (2002: US$60 million) net provision for the mark to market valuation of the hedge books held by companies acquired in 2000 and 2001 and other financial assets of US$145 million (2002: US$122 million) all of which are non interest bearing. Further details of the instruments included within the acquisition provision for mark to market valuation of the hedge books held by companies acquired are shown in section A above and section C below. |
(g) | These non interest bearing financial liabilities have been presented in the financial statements on a discounted basis, using a discount rate of 3.8 per cent. |
114 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
28 | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CONTINUED |
C) | Commodities | ||||
The Groups material commodity derivatives are itemised below: | 2003 | 2002 | |||
Fair value | Fair value | ||||
US$m | US$m | ||||
Commodity derivatives, including options, of which US$2 million | |||||
relates to acquisitions during 2000 | (20 | ) | 6 | ||
Adjust: Fair value recognised on acquisition in respect of these contracts | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | |
Fair value not recognised | (22 | ) | 3 | ||
D) | Liquidity | ||||
The maturity profile of the Groups net debt is discussed in the Balance sheet section of the Financial review on page 33. | |||||
Financial assets and liabilities are repayable as follows | |||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||
US$m | US$m | ||||
Financial liabilities | |||||
Within 1 year, or on demand | (2,270 | ) | (3,434 | ) | |
Between 1 and 2 years | (672 | ) | (215 | ) | |
Between 2 and 3 years | (1,109 | ) | (394 | ) | |
Between 3 and 4 years | (1,019 | ) | (1,042 | ) | |
Between 4 and 5 years | (745 | ) | (810 | ) | |
After 5 years | (447 | ) | (466 | ) | |
(6,262 | ) | (6,361 | ) | ||
Financial assets | |||||
Within 1 year, or on demand | 670 | 668 | |||
Between 1 and 2 years | 10 | 10 | |||
Between 2 and 3 years | 14 | 10 | |||
Between 3 and 4 years | 15 | 14 | |||
Between 4 and 5 years | 14 | 14 | |||
After 5 years | 87 | 168 | |||
Total per currency/interest rate analysis | (5,452 | ) | (5,477 | ) | |
In
addition, of the remaining US$39 million net provision for the mark to market
of the hedge books held by companies on acquisition in 2000 and 2001, US$9
million matures in 2004, US$29 million in 2005 to 2008 and US$1 million thereafter.
There are other financial assets totalling US$145 million, of which US$96
million have no fixed maturity and US$49 million has a maturity greater than
one year.
In
accordance with FRS 4, all commercial paper is classified as short term borrowings,
though of the US$1,687 million outstanding at 31 December 2003, US$1,100 million
was backed by medium term facilities (2002: commercial paper of US$1,749 million
all backed by medium term facilities). Under US and Australian GAAP, the US$1,100
million would be grouped within non current borrowings at 31 December 2003. Further
details of available facilities are given below.
As
at 31 December 2003, a total of US$1,618 million is outstanding under the
US$3 billion European Medium Term Notes facility, of which US$70 million
is repayable
within one year. A US$600 million five year bond was issued in 2003 under
the SEC shelf registration.
At
31 December 2003, the Group had unutilised standby credit facilities totalling
US$2.75 billion. These facilities, which are summarised below, are for back upsupport
for the Groups
commercial paper programmes and for general corporate purposes:
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Unutilised standby credit facilities | ||||
Within 1 year | 1,650 | 1,050 | ||
Between 1 and 2 years | – | 1,650 | ||
After 2 years | 1,100 | 100 | ||
2,750 | 2,800 | |||
Rio
Tinto 2003 Annual
report and financial statements |
115 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
28 | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CONTINUED |
E) | Fair values of financial instruments |
The carrying values and the fair values of Rio Tintos financial instruments at 31 December are shown in the following table. Fair value is the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in an arms length transaction between informed and willing parties. Where available, market values have been used to determine fair values. In other cases, fair values have been calculated using quotations from independent financial institutions, or by discounting expected cash flows at prevailing market rates. The fair value of cash, short term borrowings and loans to joint ventures and associates approximates to the carrying value, as a result of their short maturity, or because they carry floating rates of interest. |
|
If Rio Tintos financial instruments were realised at the fair values shown, tax of US$86 million would become payable (2002: US$37 million recoverable). The maturity of the financial instruments is shown in the notes above. |
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | ||||||
value | value | value | value | ||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||
Primary financial instruments held or issued to finance the Groups operations: | |||||||||
Cash (note 17) | 395 | 395 | 325 | 325 | |||||
Current asset investments (note 17) | 230 | 229 | 306 | 310 | |||||
Short term borrowings (note 18) | (2,199 | ) | (2,199 | ) | (3,370 | ) | (3,387 | ) | |
Medium and long term borrowings (note 22) | (4,231 | ) | (4,343 | ) | (2,856 | ) | (2,986 | ) | |
Loans to joint ventures and associates (note 13) | 174 | 174 | 253 | 253 | |||||
Other liabilities | (63 | ) | (63 | ) | (165 | ) | (165 | ) | |
(5,694 | ) | (5,807 | ) | (5,507 | ) | (5,650 | ) | ||
Derivative financial instruments held to manage the interest rate and currency profile: | |||||||||
Currency forward contracts hedging trading transactions (A) | (22 | ) | 207 | (20 | ) | (115 | ) | ||
Currency option contracts hedging trading transactions (A) | (27 | ) | 10 | (43 | ) | (82 | ) | ||
Currency forward contracts hedging future capital expenditure (A) | – | 93 | – | 62 | |||||
Currency swaps hedging non US dollar debt (A) | 387 | 387 | 152 | 152 | |||||
Interest rate swap agreements and options (B) | – | 68 | – | 94 | |||||
Commodity forward/future contracts hedging trading transactions (C) | 2 | (20 | ) | 3 | 6 | ||||
(5,354 | ) | (5,062 | ) | (5,415 | ) | (5,533 | ) | ||
Less: mark to market provision at acquisition/other provisions | 47 | 60 | |||||||
other financial assets | (145 | ) | (122 | ) | |||||
Total per liquidity analysis | (5,452 | ) | (5,477 | ) | |||||
Gains and losses on hedges | |||||||||
Changes in the fair value of derivatives used as hedges of trading transactions, capital expenditure and interest rate exposures, including changes relating to derivatives held by companies acquired during 2000 and 2001, are not recognised in the financial statements until the hedged position matures. |
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Gains | Losses | Total net | Total net | |||||
gains/ | gains/ | |||||||
(losses) | (losses) | |||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
Unrecognised gains and losses on hedges at 1 January | 202 | (177 | ) | 25 | (349 | ) | ||
Gains and losses arising in previous years recognised in the year | (61 | ) | 26 | (35 | ) | 88 | ||
Gains and losses arising before 1 January that were not recognised in the year | 141 | (151 | ) | (10 | ) | (261 | ) | |
Gains and losses arising in the year that were not recognised in the year | 330 | 85 | 415 | 286 | ||||
Unrecognised gains and losses on hedges at 31 December | 471 | (66 | ) | 405 | 25 | |||
Of which: | ||||||||
Gains and losses expected to be recognised within one year | 161 | (18 | ) | 143 | 35 | |||
Gains and losses expected to be recognised in more than one year | 310 | (48 | ) | 262 | (10 | ) | ||
471 | (66 | ) | 405 | 25 | ||||
116 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
29 | CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS |
2003
US$m |
2002
US$m |
|||
|
||||
Commitments | ||||
Contracted capital expenditure at 31 December | 612 | 350 | ||
Operating lease commitments | 131 | 102 | ||
Other commitments | 67 | 51 |
(a) | Included above are operating lease commitments falling due within one year of US$38 million (2002: US$26 million). |
Unconditional
purchase obligations
The
aggregate amount of future payment commitments under unconditional purchase
obligations outstanding at 31 December was:
2003
US$m |
2002
US$m |
|||
Within 1 year | 268 | 209 | ||
Between 1 and 2 years | 278 | 213 | ||
Between 2 and 3 years | 275 | 215 | ||
Between 3 and 4 years | 243 | 187 | ||
Between 4 and 5 years | 234 | 193 | ||
After 5 years | 1,712 | 1,522 | ||
3,010 | 2,539 | |||
Contingent
liabilities
The aggregate amount of indemnities and other performance
guarantees on which no material loss is expected is US$266 million (2002: US$145
million).
In
2002, the Australian Tax Office (ATO)
issued assessments of approximately A$500 million (which amount includes penalties
and interest) in relation to certain transactions undertaken in 1997 to acquire
franking credits. The transactions were conducted based on the Groups
considered view of the law prevailing at the time. Subsequently, the law
was
changed. The Group lodged objections to the assessments and on 26 May 2003
the ATO substantially disallowed those objections. The Group subsequently
lodged proceedings in the Federal Court to dispute the assessments.
As
required by Australian tax law and practice, part payment of the disputed
tax assessments was required pending resolution of the dispute. A payment
of A$164 million was made, which will be subject to recovery with interest
if, as it is believed based on Counsels opinion,
the Group is successful in challenging the assessments. Consequently, the
amount paid has been recorded as a receivable on the balance sheet (see
note 16).
As
at the year end, the amount of the disputed tax assessments, penalties and
interest stood at approximately A$454 million (US$340 million at the year
end exchange rate) after tax relief on the general interest charge component.
There
are a number of legal claims arising from the normal course of business which
are currently outstanding against the Group. No material loss to the Group
is expected to result from these claims.
30 | AVERAGE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES |
Subsidiaries
and
joint
arrangements (a)
|
Joint
ventures and
associates
(Rio
Tinto share)
(restated) |
Group
total
(restated) |
||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
The principal locations of employment were: | ||||||||||||
Australia and New Zealand | 9,274 | 8,721 | 983 | 995 | 10,257 | 9,716 | ||||||
North America | 8,478 | 8,906 | 1,034 | 873 | 9,512 | 9,779 | ||||||
Africa | 5,661 | 6,012 | 422 | 450 | 6,083 | 6,462 | ||||||
Europe | 3,059 | 2,765 | 386 | 433 | 3,445 | 3,198 | ||||||
South America | 1,794 | 1,708 | 773 | 940 | 2,567 | 2,648 | ||||||
Indonesia | 569 | 908 | 3,234 | 4,154 | 3,803 | 5,062 | ||||||
Other countries | 205 | 150 | 144 | 158 | 349 | 308 | ||||||
29,040 | 29,170 | 6,976 | 8,003 | 36,016 | 37,173 | |||||||
(a) | Employee numbers, which represent the average for the year, include 100 per cent of employees of subsidiary companies. Employee numbers for joint arrangements, joint ventures and associates are proportional to the Groups equity interest. |
(b) | Part time employees are included on a full time equivalent basis. Temporary employees are included in employee numbers. |
(c) | People employed by contractors are not included. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 117 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
31 | PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES |
At 31 December 2003 | |||||||
Company and country of incorporation | Principal activities |
Class
of
shares
held |
Proportion
of
class held |
Group
interest |
|||
% | % | ||||||
|
|
||||||
Australia | |||||||
Argyle Diamond Mines (g) | Mining and processing of diamonds | (g) | 100 | ||||
Coal & Allied Industries Limited | Coal mining | Ordinary | 75.71 | 75.71 | |||
Comalco Limited | Bauxite mining; alumina production; | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | |||
primary aluminium smelting | |||||||
Dampier Salt Limited | Salt production | Ordinary | 64.94 | 64.94 | |||
Energy Resources of Australia Limited | Uranium mining | Class A | 68.39 | 68.39 | |||
Hamersley Iron Pty Limited | Iron ore mining | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | |||
Rio Tinto Coal Australia Pty Limited | Coal mining | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | |||
|
|
||||||
Brazil | |||||||
Rio Paracatu Mineração S.A. | Gold mining | Common | 51 | 51 | |||
Mineração Serra da Fortaleza Limitada | Nickel mining | Common | 99.9 | 99.9 | |||
|
|
||||||
Canada | |||||||
Iron Ore Company of Canada Inc (c) | Iron ore mining; iron ore pellets | Series A & E | 58.72 | 58.72 | |||
QIT-Fer et Titane Inc | Titanium dioxide feedstock; high purity | Common shares | 100 | 100 | |||
iron and steel | Preferred shares | 100 | 100 | ||||
|
|
||||||
France | |||||||
Talc de Luzenac S.A. | Mining, refining and marketing of talc | E 15.25 | 99.94 | 99.94 | |||
|
|
||||||
Indonesia | |||||||
P.T. Kelian Equatorial Mining | Gold mining | Ordinary US$1 | 90 | 90 | |||
|
|
||||||
Namibia | |||||||
Rössing Uranium Limited (d) | Uranium mining | BN$1 | 71.16 | ) | 68.58 | ||
CN10c | 70.59 | ) | |||||
|
|
||||||
Papua New Guinea | |||||||
Bougainville Copper Limited (e) | Copper and gold mining | Ordinary 1 Kina | 53.58 | 53.58 | |||
|
|
||||||
South Africa | |||||||
Palabora Mining Company Limited | Copper mining, smelting and refining | R1 | 75.2 | 49.2 | |||
Richards Bay Iron and Titanium (Pty) Limited | Titanium dioxide feedstock; high purity iron | R1 | 50.5 | 50 | |||
|
|
||||||
Sweden | |||||||
Zinkgruvan AB | Zinc, lead and silver mining | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | |||
|
|
||||||
United Kingdom | |||||||
Anglesey Aluminium Metal Limited | Aluminium smelting | Ordinary £1 | 51 | 51 | |||
|
|
||||||
United States of America | |||||||
Kennecott Holdings Corporation | Copper and gold mining, smelting | Common US$0.01 | 100 | 100 | |||
(including Kennecott Utah Copper, | and refining, land development | ||||||
Kennecott Minerals and Kennecott | |||||||
Land Company) | |||||||
Kennecott Energy and Coal Company | Coal mining | Common US$1 | 100 | 100 | |||
U.S. Borax Inc. | Mining, refining and marketing of borates | Common US$1 | 100 | 100 | |||
|
|
||||||
Zimbabwe | |||||||
Rio Tinto Zimbabwe Limited | Gold mining and metal refining | Ordinary Z40c | 56.04 | 56.04 | |||
|
|
(a) | The Group comprises a large number of companies and it is not practical to include all of them in this list. The list therefore only includes those companies that have a more significant impact on the profit or assets of the Group. |
(b) | All companies operate mainly in the countries in which they are incorporated. |
(c) | In addition, the Group holds 20.3 per cent of the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Income Fund which has a 15.1 per cent interest in the Iron Ore Company of Canada. |
(d) | The Groups shareholding in Rössing Uranium Limited carries 35.54 per cent of the total voting rights. Rössing is consolidated by virtue of board control. |
(e) | The results of Bougainville Copper Limited are not consolidated refer to note 40. |
(f) | The Groups principal subsidiaries are held by intermediate holding companies and not directly by Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited. |
(g) | The entity marked (g) is unincorporated. |
118 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
32 | PRINCIPAL JOINT VENTURE INTERESTS |
At 31 December 2003 | |||||
Name
and country of incorporation/operation
|
Principal
activities |
Class
of
shares
held |
Group
interest |
||
Australia | |||||
Blair Athol Coal | Coal mining | (b) | 71.2 | ||
Kestrel | Coal mining | (b) | 80.0 | ||
Hail Creek | Coal mining | (b) | 92.0 | ||
Mount Thorley | Coal mining | (b) | 60.6 | ||
Bengalla | Coal mining | (b) | 30.3 | ||
Warkworth | Coal mining | (b) | 42.1 | ||
Chile | |||||
Minera Escondida Limitada | Copper mining and refining | 30 | |||
Indonesia | |||||
Grasberg expansion | Copper and gold mining | (b) | 40 | ||
United States of America | |||||
Decker | Coal mining | (b) | 50.0 | ||
Greens Creek | Silver, gold, zinc and lead mining | (b) | 70.3 | ||
Rawhide | Gold mining | (b) | 51.0 | ||
The Group has joint control of the above ventures and therefore includes them in its accounts using the gross equity accounting technique.
The references above are explained at the foot of note 34.
33 | PRINCIPAL ASSOCIATES |
At 31 December 2003 |
Name
and country of incorporation/operation
|
Principal
activities
|
Number
of
shares
held
by
the Group |
Class
of
shares
held
|
Proportion
of
class held
% |
Group
interest
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Papua New Guinea | |||||||||
Lihir Gold Limited (d) | Gold mining | 185,758,126 | Ordinary Kina 0.1 | 14.49 | 14.49 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Portugal | |||||||||
Sociedade Mineira de Neves-Corvo S.A. (Somincor) | Copper mining | 7,178,500 | E 5 | 49 | 49 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
South Africa | |||||||||
Tisand (Pty) Limited | Rutile and zircon mining | 7,353,675 | R1 | 49.5 | 50 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
United States of America | |||||||||
Cortez | Gold mining | (b) | 40.0 | ||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. (d) | Copper
and gold mining in Indonesia |
23,931,100 | Class B Common US$0.10 | 13.1 | 13.1 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The references above are explained at the foot of note 34. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 119 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued | |||||||||
34 PRINCIPAL JOINT ARRANGEMENTS | |||||||||
At 31 December 2003 | |||||||||
Name and country of incorporation/operation | Principal activities | Number of | Class of | Proportion | Group | ||||
shares held | shares held | of class held | interest | ||||||
by the Group | % | % | |||||||
Australia | |||||||||
Boyne Smelters Limited | Aluminium smelting | 153,679,560 | Ordinary | 59.4 | 59.4 | ||||
Gladstone Power Station | Power generation | (b) | 42.1 | ||||||
Northparkes Mine | Copper/gold mining and processing | (b) | 80 | ||||||
Queensland Alumina Limited | Alumina production | 854,078 | Ordinary | 38.6 | 38.6 | ||||
Robe River Iron Associates | Iron ore mining | (b) | 53 | ||||||
HIsmelt® Kwinana | Iron technology | (b) | 60 | ||||||
Bao-HI Ranges Joint Venture | Iron ore mining | (b) | 50 | ||||||
Canada | |||||||||
Diavik | Mining and processing of diamonds | (b) | 60 | ||||||
New Zealand | |||||||||
New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited | Aluminium smelting | 24,998,400 | Ordinary | 79.36 | 79.36 | ||||
(a) | The Group comprises a large number of companies and it is not practical to include all of them in notes 32 to 34. The list therefore only includes those companies that have a more significant impact on the profit or assets of the Group. |
(b) | Those joint ventures, associates and joint arrangements marked (b) are unincorporated entities. |
(c) | All entities operate mainly in the countries in which they are incorporated except where stated. |
(d) | The Group continues to have significant influence over the activities of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. and Lihir Gold Limited, including Board representation; consequently the Group equity accounts for its interests in these companies. |
(e) | The Groups principal joint ventures, associates and joint arrangements are held by intermediate holding companies and not directly by Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited. |
35 PURCHASES AND SALES OF SUBSIDIARIES, JOINT ARRANGEMENTS, JOINT VENTURES AND ASSOCIATES
Disposals
The Group disposed of its 25 per cent interest in Minera Alumbrera Limited, Argentina
and the wholly owned Peak Gold, Australia during March 2003; and its 50 per cent
interest in Kaltim Prima Coal, Indonesia during October 2003. The profit on disposal
of these businesses was US$126 million; this has been classified as an exceptional
item and consequently excluded from adjusted earnings at the foot of the profit
and loss account. The entire sale proceeds of US$403 million have been included
in the cash flow statement within Sales
of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates.
In 2002, total disposal proceeds for the sale of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates were US$233 million. The Group disposed of the Moura joint venture and Ravensworth and Narama thermal coal complex which were acquired with the Australian coal operations of the Peabody Group in 2001.
Acquisitions
During 2003
Kennecott Energy increased its holding in Pegasus Technologies Inc. from 20 per
cent to 86 per cent. The transaction gave rise to goodwill of US$20 million.
The transaction did not involve any cash consideration.
On
6 June 2002, the Group acquired an additional 9.5 per cent interest in
reduction lines 1 and 2 at Boyne Smelters at a cost of US$78 million. The
Group also increased its interest in Coal & Allied from 72.71 to 75.71
per cent on 17 September 2002, for a consideration of US$29 million. On
20 December 2002, the Group contributed additional equity to IOC, increasing
its shareholding from 56.1 to 58.7 per cent.
120 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
36 DIRECTORS REMUNERATION | ||||
Aggregate remuneration of the directors of the parent companies was as follows: | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$000 | US$000 | |||
Emoluments | 9,571 | 9,541 | ||
Long term incentive plans | 3,278 | 8,443 | ||
12,849 | 17,984 | |||
Pension contributions | 424 | 65 | ||
Gains made on exercise of share options | 2,029 | 2,992 |
For 2003, a total of US$4,048,800 (2002: US$5,389,636) was attributable to the
highest paid director in respect of the aggregate amounts disclosed in the above
table, including gains made on exercise of share options. The accrued pension
entitlement for the highest paid director was US$1,158,700 (2002: US$984,000).
The aggregate remuneration, including pension contributions and other retirement benefits, incurred by Rio Tinto plc in respect of its directors was US$9,794,000 (2002: US$11,492,000). There were no pension contributions.
The aggregate remuneration, including pension contributions and other retirement benefits, incurred by Rio Tinto Limited in respect of its directors was US$5,508,000 (2002: US$6,557,000). The aggregate pension contribution was US$423,938 (2002: US$64,730).
During 2003, six directors (2002: seven) accrued retirement benefits under defined benefit arrangements.
Shares awarded last year in respect of the FTSE 1997 and MCCP 1999 performance periods vested after the publication of the 2002 Annual report and financial statements and the value of awards provided therein were estimated based on share prices of 1,169p and A$32.52. The actual share prices on 28 February 2003 when the awards vested were 1,268.5p and A$33.35 and the above 2003 figures for long term incentive plans have been adjusted accordingly. Further details are given in the Remuneration report on page 67.
Emoluments included in the table above have been translated from local currency at the average rate for the year with the exception of bonus payments, which, together with amounts payable under long term incentive plans for 2003, have been translated at the year end rate.
More detailed information concerning directors remuneration,
shareholdings and options is shown in the Remuneration report, including Tables
1 to 6, on pages 65 to 69.
37 AUDITORS REMUNERATION | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Group Auditors remuneration | ||||
Audit services | ||||
Statutory audit | 5.2 | 4.1 | ||
Audit-related regulatory reporting | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||
Further assurance services | 0.1 | | ||
Tax services (d) | 2.5 | 2.3 | ||
Other Services | ||||
Financial information technology | 0.1 | | ||
Internal audit (e) | 0.1 | 0.3 | ||
Other services not covered above | 1.6 | 1.5 | ||
10.1 | 8.7 | |||
Remuneration payable to other accounting firms | ||||
Statutory audit | 0.4 | 0.3 | ||
Tax services | 2.5 | 0.8 | ||
Internal audit | 2.3 | 1.0 | ||
Other services | 6.9 | 3.7 | ||
12.1 | 5.8 | |||
22.2 | 14.5 | |||
(a) | The audit fees payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers, the Group Auditors, are reviewed by the Audit committee. The committee sets the policy for regulating the award of non audit work to the auditors and reviews the nature and extent of such work, and the amount of the related fees, to ensure that independence is maintained. The fees disclosed above consolidate all payments made to PricewaterhouseCoopers by the companies and their subsidiaries. |
(b) | Amounts payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers for non audit work for the Groups UK companies were US$1.3 million (2002: US$0.9 million) and for the Groups Australian companies were US$2.3 million (2002: US$1.7 million). |
(c) | Remuneration payable to other accounting firms does not include fees for similar services payable to other suppliers of consultancy services. |
(d) | Group Auditors remuneration for tax services in 2003 comprise US$1.4 million in respect of compliance services and US$1.1 million in respect of advisory services. |
(e) | Internal audit fees payable to Group Auditors in 2003 relate to projects which were committed in 2002. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 121 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
38 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Information about material related party transactions of the Rio Tinto Group is set out below:
Subsidiary companies:
Details
of investments in principal subsidiary companies are disclosed in note 31.
Joint ventures and associates:
Information
relating
to joint ventures and associates can be found in the following notes:
Note 4 Exceptional
items
Note 5 Net interest payable and similar charges
Note 6 Amortisation
of discount
Note 7 Taxation charge for the year
Note 12 Property,
plant and equipment
Note 13 Fixed asset investments
Note 14 Net
debt of joint ventures and associates
Note 16 Accounts receivable and
prepayments
Note 19 Accounts payable and accruals
Note 25 Share
premium and reserves
Note 26 Product analysis
Note 27 Geographical
analysis
Note 30 Average number of employees
Note 32 Principal
joint venture interests
Note 33 Principal associates
Note 35 Purchases
and sales of subsidiaries, joint arrangements, joint ventures and associates
Information relating to joint arrangements can be found in note 34 Principal joint arrangements.
Pension funds:
Information
relating to pension fund arrangements is disclosed in note 41.
Directors:
Details of directors remuneration
are set out in note 36 and in the Remuneration report on pages 60 to 69.
Leighton Holdings Limited (Leighton):
In 2001,
John Morschel became a director and, subsequently, the chairman of Leighton,
Australias
largest project development and contracting group. A number of Rio Tinto companies
in Australia and Indonesia have, in the ordinary course of their businesses,
awarded commercial contracts to subsidiaries of Leighton. The board does not
consider the value of these contracts to be material to the business of either
Leighton or the Rio Tinto Group. On 22 December 2003, Leighton announced that
Mr Morschel would be resigning from the board of Leighton.
Mr Morschel
is expected to resign by the end of March 2004.
39 EXCHANGE RATES IN US$ | ||||||||
The principal exchange rates used in the preparation of the 2003 financial statements are: | ||||||||
Annual average | Year end | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
Sterling | 1.63 | 1.50 | 1.78 | 1.60 | ||||
Australian dollar | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.75 | 0.57 | ||||
Canadian dollar | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 0.63 | ||||
South African rand | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.12 | ||||
(a) | The Australian dollar exchange rates, given above, are based on the Hedge Settlement Rate set by the Australian Financial Markets Association. |
122 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
40 | BOUGAINVILLE COPPER LIMITED (BCL) |
The Panguna mine remains shut down. Access to the mine site has not been possible and an accurate assessment of the condition of the assets cannot be determined. Considerable funding would be required to recommence operations to the level which applied at the time of the mines closure in 1989 and these funding requirements cannot be forecast accurately. The directors do not have access to reliable, verifiable or objective information on BCL and the directors have therefore decided to exclude BCL information from the financial statements. BCL reported a net profit of US$4 million for the financial year (2002: profit of US$2 million). This is based upon actual transactions for the financial year. The aggregate amount of capital and reserves reported by BCL as at 31 December 2003 was US$97 million (2002: US$76 million). The Group owns 214,887,966 shares in BCL, representing 53.6 per cent of the issued share capital. The investment of US$195 million was fully provided against in 1991. At 31 December 2003, the market value of the shareholding in BCL was US$39 million.
41 | POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS |
a) | SSAP 24 accounting and disclosure |
Pensions The Group operates a number of pension plans around the world. Whilst some of these plans are defined contribution, the majority are of the funded defined benefit type, with assets held in separate trustee administered funds. Valuations of these plans are produced and updated annually to 31 December by independent qualified actuaries. Further details regarding the plans are provided in the FRS 17 disclosures in section (b) of this note. |
UK | Australia | US | Canada | Other (e) | ||||||
Summary of independent actuarial reviews | ||||||||||
At 31 December 2003 | ||||||||||
Assumptions | ||||||||||
Rate of return on investments (a) | 6.9% | 6.4% | 6.7% | 6.5% | 9.2% | |||||
Rate of earnings growth, where appropriate (b) | 4.8% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 6.5% | |||||
Rate of increase in pensions | 2.8% | 2.5% | | | 4.5% | |||||
Results | ||||||||||
Smoothed market value of assets ($m) (c) | 1,506 | 962 | 573 | 673 | 194 | |||||
Percentage of coverage of liabilities by assets (d) | 124% | 100% | 81% | 80% | 91% | |||||
Amount of deficit for individual plans with net deficits ($m) | 13 | 7 | 145 | 174 | 19 | |||||
At 31 December 2002 | ||||||||||
Assumptions | ||||||||||
Rate of return on investments (a) | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.7% | 6.5% | 11.8% | |||||
Rate of earnings growth, where appropriate (b) | 4.8% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 3.7% | 10.5% | |||||
Rate of increase in pensions | 2.3% | 2.5% | | | 7.0% | |||||
Results | ||||||||||
Smoothed market value of assets ($m) (c) | 1,358 | 600 | 551 | 538 | 202 | |||||
Percentage of coverage of liabilities by assets (d) | 129% | 103% | 81% | 82% | 141% | |||||
Amount of deficit for individual plans with net deficits ($m) | 14 | | 136 | 134 | | |||||
(a) | The rate of return on investments assumed for Australia is after tax. |
(b) | The rate of earnings growth assumed includes a promotional salary scale where appropriate. |
(c) | Assets were measured at market value smoothed over a one year period. |
(d) | Asset coverage of the liability is quoted after allowing for expected increases in earnings. |
(e) | The assumptions vary by location for the Other plans. Assumptions shown are for Africa. |
Other
information
A
triennial actuarial valuation of the Groups
UK plan was made at 31 March 2003 using the projected unit method.
In Australia, whilst Group companies sponsor or subscribe to a number of pension plans, the Rio Tinto Staff Superannuation Fund is the only significant plan. This plan principally contains defined contribution liabilities but also has defined benefit liabilities. Valuations are made at least every three years using the projected unit method, with the latest valuation being as at 30 June 2003.
A number of defined benefit pension plans are sponsored by the US entities, typically with separate provision for salaried and hourly paid staff. Valuations are made annually at 1 January using the projected unit method.
A number of defined benefit pension plans are sponsored by entities in Canada. Valuations are updated annually using the projected unit method.
Other defined benefit plans sponsored by the Group around the world were assessed at various dates during 2001, 2002 and 2003. The above summary is based on the most recent valuation in each case, updated to the appropriate balance sheet date.
The
expected average remaining service life in the major plans ranges from ten to
17 years with an overall average of 12 years.
The
Group uses asset values based on market value, but smoothed over a one year period
in arriving at its pension costs under SSAP 24. The main pension plans providing
purely defined contribution benefits held assets, equal to their liabilities,
of US$186 million as at
31 December 2003. The Groups
contributions to these plans of US$9 million are charged against profits and
are included in the Regular cost shown below.
The Group also operates a number of unfunded plans, which are included within the deficit and percentage coverage statistics above, measured on a basis consistent with both SSAP 24 and FRS 17.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 123 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
41 | POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS CONTINUED |
Profit and loss account effect of pension costs, pre tax and minorities
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Regular cost | (102 | ) | (98 | ) |
Variation cost | (90 | ) | (2 | ) |
Interest on prepayment under SSAP 24 | 42 | 46 | ||
Net post retirement cost | (150 | ) | (54 | ) |
The variation cost reflects the amortisation of the excess of the pension asset carried in the balance sheet at the beginning of the year over the surplus/(deficit) in the relevant plans calculated on a SSAP 24 valuation basis. The increase in the variation cost in 2003 reflects the reduced surpluses/(increased deficits) of the plans at 1 January 2003 compared to 1 January 2002.
Balance sheet effect of pension assets and liabilities, pre tax and minorities
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Prepayment under SSAP 24 | 620 | 634 | ||
Provisions | (77 | ) | (44 | ) |
Net post retirement asset | 543 | 590 | ||
Post
retirement healthcare
Certain
subsidiaries of the Group, mainly in the US, provide health and life insurance
benefits to retired employees and in some cases their beneficiaries and covered
dependants. Eligibility for cover is dependent upon certain age and service criteria.
These arrangements are unfunded.
On
30 September 2003, the unfunded accumulated post retirement benefit obligation
and annual cost of accrual of benefits were determined by independent actuaries
using the projected unit method. The main financial assumptions were: discount
rate 6.1 per cent (at
30
September 2002: 6.5 per cent), Medical Trend Rate 11.2 per cent reducing to 4.7
per cent by the year 2011 (at 30 September 2002: initially 8.0 per cent reducing
to 5.0 per cent by the year 2009), claims cost based on individual company experience.
The assumptions were consistent with those adopted for determining pension costs.
At 30 September 2003, which is the measurement date, the unfunded accumulated
post retirement benefits obligation (excluding associates and joint ventures)
was US$563 million (at 30 September 2002: US$437 million).
Profit and loss account effect of post retirement healthcare costs, pre tax and minorities
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Regular cost | (9 | ) | (8 | ) |
Amortisation | 4 | 6 | ||
Interest | (29 | ) | (23 | ) |
Net post retirement cost | (34 | ) | (25 | ) |
Balance sheet effect of post retirement healthcare liabilities, pre tax and minorities | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Provisions | (498 | ) | (466 | ) |
124 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
41 | POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS CONTINUED |
b) | FRS 17 Transitional disclosures |
FRS
17 Retirement
Benefits, which deals with accounting for post retirement benefits,
has not been adopted, but the additional disclosures which are required
are shown below. The standard requires pension deficits, and surpluses
to the extent that they are considered recoverable, to be recognised
in full. Annual service cost and net financial income on the assets
and liabilities of the plans are recognised through earnings. Other
fluctuations in the value of the surpluses/deficits are recognised
in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses (STRGL). Details of post retirement benefit plan assets and liabilities at 31 December 2003, 2002 and 2001, valued on a projected unit basis in accordance with FRS 17, are set out below: |
UK | Australia | US | Canada | Other | ||||||
(mainly | ||||||||||
Africa) | ||||||||||
Main assumptions for FRS 17 purposes | ||||||||||
At 31 December 2003 | ||||||||||
Rate of increase in salaries | 4.8% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 6.5% | |||||
Rate of increase in pensions | 2.8% | 2.5% | | | 4.5% | |||||
Discount rate | 5.4% | 6.0% | 5.9% | 6.1% | 9.0% | |||||
Inflation | 2.8% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.3% | 4.5% | |||||
At 31 December 2002 | ||||||||||
Rate of increase in salaries | 4.8% | 4.0% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 10.5% | |||||
Rate of increase in pensions | 2.3% | 2.5% | | | 7.0% | |||||
Discount rate | 5.6% | 6.2% | 6.2% | 6.5% | 11.5% | |||||
Inflation | 2.3% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 7.0% | |||||
At 31 December 2001 | ||||||||||
Rate of increase in salaries | 5.5% | 4.0% | 3.5% | 4.0% | 10.5% | |||||
Rate of increase in pensions | 2.5% | 2.5% | | | 5.8% | |||||
Discount rate | 6.0% | 6.5% | 7.0% | 7.0% | 11.5% | |||||
Inflation | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 5.8% | |||||
The main financial assumptions used for the health care schemes, which are predominantly in the US, were: discount rate: 5.9 per cent (2002: 6.2 per cent, 2001: 7.0 per cent), Medical Trend Rate: 11.5 per cent reducing to 5.0 per cent by the year 2011 (2002: Medical Trend Rate: 8.0 per cent reducing to 5.0 per cent by the year 2009, 2001: Medical Trend Rate: 8.5 per cent reducing to 5.0 per cent by the year 2009), claims cost based on individual company experience.
UK | Australia | US | Canada | Other | ||||||
(mainly | ||||||||||
Africa) | ||||||||||
Long term rate of return expected at 31 December 2003 | ||||||||||
Equities | 7.8% | 7.0% | 7.5% | 7.3% | 9.5% | |||||
Fixed interest bonds | 5.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | 5.2% | 8.5% | |||||
Index linked bonds | 5.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | 5.2% | 8.5% | |||||
Other | 4.6% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 3.3% | 5.6% | |||||
Long term rate of return expected at 31 December 2002 | ||||||||||
Equities | 7.3% | 7.0% | 7.2% | 7.2% | 12.5% | |||||
Fixed interest bonds | 5.0% | 5.5% | 5.6% | 6.0% | 11.0% | |||||
Index linked bonds | 5.0% | 5.5% | 5.6% | 6.0% | 11.0% | |||||
Other | 4.6% | 5.9% | 6.4% | 5.0% | 10.2% | |||||
Long term rate of return expected at 31 December 2001 | ||||||||||
Equities | 7.5% | 7.0% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 12.5% | |||||
Fixed interest bonds | 5.5% | 6.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 11.0% | |||||
Index linked bonds | 5.5% | 6.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 11.0% | |||||
Other | 5.3% | 6.3% | 6.8% | 5.1% | 9.7% | |||||
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 125 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
41 POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS CONTINUED
Scheme
assets
The
assets in the pension plans and the contributions made were:
UK | Australia | US | Canada | Other | Total | ||||||||
(mainly | |||||||||||||
Africa) | |||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Value at 31 December 2003 | |||||||||||||
Equities | 1,094 | 646 | 401 | 451 | 82 | 2,674 | |||||||
Fixed interest bonds | 300 | 229 | 126 | 193 | 15 | 863 | |||||||
Index linked bonds | 127 | 7 | 12 | 44 | | 190 | |||||||
Other | 54 | 88 | 74 | 21 | 97 | 334 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
1,575 | 970 | 613 | 709 | 194 | 4,061 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Value at 31 December 2002 | |||||||||||||
Equities | 823 | 377 | 342 | 271 | 93 | 1,906 | |||||||
Fixed interest bonds | 294 | 160 | 139 | 148 | 18 | 759 | |||||||
Index linked bonds | 95 | 5 | 11 | 32 | | 143 | |||||||
Other | 60 | 65 | 39 | 64 | 190 | 418 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
1,272 | 607 | 531 | 515 | 301 | 3,226 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Value at 31 December 2001 | |||||||||||||
Equities | 965 | 416 | 441 | 375 | 161 | 2,358 | |||||||
Fixed interest bonds | 244 | 132 | 122 | 153 | 45 | 696 | |||||||
Index linked bonds | 81 | 5 | 13 | 36 | | 135 | |||||||
Other | 66 | 64 | 56 | 17 | 30 | 233 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
1,356 | 617 | 632 | 581 | 236 | 3,422 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Employer contributions made during 2003* | 6 | 45 | 4 | 43 | 5 | 103 | |||||||
Employer contributions made during 2002* | | 10 | 4 | 15 | 4 | 33 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
* | The contributions shown include US$9 million (2002: US$13 million) for defined contribution plans. |
In
addition, there were contributions of US$18 million (2002: US$16 million) in
respect of unfunded health care schemes in the year. Since these schemes are
unfunded, contributions for future years will be equal to benefit payments and
therefore cannot be predetermined.
In
relation to pensions, it is currently expected that there will be no regular
employer or employee contributions to the UK plan in 2004. Contributions
are made to the main Australian plan according to the recommendation of the
plan actuary and are primarily to a mixed defined benefit/defined contribution
type arrangement (included in the above figures). In North America, contributions
are agreed annually in nominal terms. Additional contributions will be paid
in 2004 in the light of the position in the US and Canadian plans. Whilst
contributions for 2004 are yet to be determined, the currently expected level
of contributions by the Group to the plans in Australia, Canada and the US
is expected to be some US$30-US$40 million higher than in 2003.
The
most recent full valuation of the UK plans was at 31 March 2003. The most
recent full valuation of the Australian plans was at 30 June 2003. For both
the US and Canadian major plans, the most recent full valuation was at 1
January 2003.
126 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
41 POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS CONTINUED
Surpluses/(deficits)
in the plans
The
following amounts were measured in accordance with FRS 17:
At 31 December 2003 | UK | Australia | US | Canada | Other | Healthcare | Total | |||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Total market value of plan assets | 1,575 | 970 | 613 | 709 | 194 | | 4,061 | |||||||
Present value of plan liabilities | (1,477 | ) | (963 | ) | (768 | ) | (877 | ) | (213 | ) | (561 | ) | (4,859 | ) |
Surplus/(deficit) in the plans | 98 | 7 | (155 | ) | (168 | ) | (19 | ) | (561 | ) | (798 | ) | ||
Related deferred tax | 123 | |||||||||||||
Related outside shareholders interest | 92 | |||||||||||||
Net post retirement liability | (583 | ) | ||||||||||||
Surplus/(deficit) in the plans comprises: | ||||||||||||||
Surplus | 121 | 7 | 12 | 2 | | | 142 | |||||||
Deficit | (23 | ) | | (167 | ) | (170 | ) | (19 | ) | (561 | ) | (940 | ) | |
98 | 7 | (155 | ) | (168 | ) | (19 | ) | (561 | ) | (798 | ) | |||
At 31 December 2002 | UK | Australia | US | Canada | Other | Healthcare | Total | |||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Total market value of plan assets | 1,272 | 607 | 531 | 515 | 301 | | 3,226 | |||||||
Present value of plan liabilities | (1,178 | ) | (594 | ) | (721 | ) | (670 | ) | (312 | ) | (417 | ) | (3,892 | ) |
Surplus/(deficit) in the plans | 94 | 13 | (190 | ) | (155 | ) | (11 | ) | (417 | ) | (666 | ) | ||
Related deferred tax | 113 | |||||||||||||
Related outside shareholders interest | 47 | |||||||||||||
Net post retirement liability | (506 | ) | ||||||||||||
Surplus/(deficit) in the plans comprises: | ||||||||||||||
Surplus | 108 | 13 | 45 | 2 | | | 168 | |||||||
Deficit | (14 | ) | | (235 | ) | (157 | ) | (11 | ) | (417 | ) | (834 | ) | |
94 | 13 | (190 | ) | (155 | ) | (11 | ) | (417 | ) | (666 | ) | |||
If the above amounts had been recognised in the financial statements, the Groups shareholders funds at 31 December would have been as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Shareholders funds including SSAP 24 post retirement net asset | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||
Deduct: SSAP 24 post retirement net asset | 67 | 96 | ||
Shareholders funds excluding SSAP 24 post retirement net asset | 9,970 | 7,366 | ||
Add: FRS 17 post retirement net liability | (583 | ) | (506 | ) |
Shareholders funds including FRS 17 post retirement net liability | 9,387 | 6,860 | ||
Movements
in deficit during the year
The
net post retirement deficit under FRS 17 before deferred tax and outside shareholders
interests would have moved as follows during 2003:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Pension | Other | Total | Total | |||||
benefits | benefits | US$m | US$m | |||||
Net post retirement (deficit)/surplus at 1 January | (249 | ) | (417 | ) | (666 | ) | 78 | |
Movement in year: | ||||||||
Currency translation adjustment | (21 | ) | (24 | ) | (45 | ) | 19 | |
Total current service cost (employer and employee) | (140 | ) | (9 | ) | (149 | ) | (113 | ) |
Past service cost | (7 | ) | | (7 | ) | (11 | ) | |
Curtailment and settlement loss (one-off costs associated with early retirements on restructuring) | | 3 | 3 | (2 | ) | |||
Plan amendments | (10 | ) | | (10 | ) | | ||
Other net finance (cost)/income | (2 | ) | (28 | ) | (30 | ) | 23 | |
Contributions (including employee contributions) | 138 | 18 | 156 | 59 | ||||
Actuarial loss recognised in STRGL | 54 | (104 | ) | (50 | ) | (719 | ) | |
Net post retirement deficit at 31 December | (237 | ) | (561 | ) | (798 | ) | (666 | ) |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 127 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
41 POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS CONTINUED
Amounts
which would have been recognised in the profit and loss account and in the STRGL
under FRS 17
The
following amounts would have been included within operating profit under FRS
17:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Pension | Other | Total | Total | |||||
benefits | benefits | US$m | US$m | |||||
Employer current service cost | (110 | ) | (12 | ) | (122 | ) | (103 | ) |
Past service cost | (7 | ) | | (7 | ) | (11 | ) | |
Curtailment and settlement cost | | 3 | 3 | (2 | ) | |||
Total operating charge | (117 | ) | (9 | ) | (126 | ) | (116 | ) |
Employer contributions of US$9 million (2002: US$13 million) for defined contribution arrangements have been included in the above operating charge.
The following amounts would have been included as other net finance (expense)/income under FRS 17:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Pension | Other | Total | Total | |||||
benefits | benefits | US$m | US$m | |||||
Expected return on pension scheme assets | 213 | | 213 | 254 | ||||
Interest on post retirement liabilities | (215 | ) | (28 | ) | (243 | ) | (231 | ) |
Net return | (2 | ) | (28 | ) | (30 | ) | 23 | |
If the above amounts had been recognised in the financial statements, instead of the SSAP 24 charges, the Groups reported net earnings for 2003 would have increased by US$17 million (2002: decreased by US$15 million).
The following amounts would have been recognised within the STRGL under FRS 17:
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Difference between the expected and actual return on plan assets: | ||||
Amount (US$m) | 354 | (599 | ) | |
As a percentage of plan assets | 9 | % | 19 | % |
Experience gains and losses on plan liabilities: | ||||
(ie variances between the actual estimate of liabilities and the subsequent outcome) | ||||
Amount (US$m) | (118 | ) | 28 | |
As a percentage of the present value of the plan liabilities | 2 | % | 1 | % |
Change in assumptions: | ||||
Amount (US$m) | (286 | ) | (148 | ) |
Total amount recognised in STRGL: | ||||
Amount (US$m) | (50 | ) | (719 | ) |
As a percentage of the present value of the plan liabilities | 1 | % | 18 | % |
128 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
42 | PARENT COMPANY BALANCE SHEETS |
Rio Tinto plc (a) | Rio Tinto Limited (b) | |||||||||
As at 31 December | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||
Note | US$m | US$m | A$m | A$m | ||||||
Fixed assets/non current assets | ||||||||||
Investments | 43 | 3,590 | 4,777 | 8,586 | 8,159 | |||||
Deferred taxation (d) | 43 | – | – | 392 | 18 | |||||
3,590 | 4,777 | 8,978 | 8,177 | |||||||
Current assets | ||||||||||
Amounts owed by subsidiaries | 2,417 | 1,410 | 1,284 | 2,568 | ||||||
Accounts receivable and prepayments | 133 | 127 | – | – | ||||||
Deferred taxation (d) | 43 | – | – | – | 5 | |||||
Cash at bank and in hand | 2 | 2 | – | – | ||||||
2,552 | 1,539 | 1,284 | 2,573 | |||||||
Creditors due within one year | ||||||||||
Amounts owed to subsidiaries | (755 | ) | (313 | ) | (287 | ) | (38 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and accruals | (4 | ) | – | (356 | ) | (12 | ) | |||
Dividends payable | (367 | ) | (329 | ) | – | (259 | ) | |||
(1,126 | ) | (642 | ) | (643 | ) | (309 | ) | |||
Net current assets | 1,426 | 897 | 641 | 2,264 | ||||||
Total assets less current liabilities | 5,016 | 5,674 | 9,619 | 10,441 | ||||||
Creditors due after one year | ||||||||||
Amounts owed to Group companies (c) | – | – | (4,806 | ) | (6,932 | ) | ||||
Provisions, including deferred taxation (d) | 43 | (46 | ) | (44 | ) | (978 | ) | (1 | ) | |
Net assets | 4,970 | 5,630 | 3,835 | 3,508 | ||||||
Capital and reserves | ||||||||||
Called up share capital | 43 | 155 | 154 | 1,711 | 1,703 | |||||
Share premium account | 43 | 1,629 | 1,610 | – | – | |||||
Other reserves | 43 | 211 | 211 | 536 | 536 | |||||
Profit and loss account | 43 | 2,975 | 3,655 | 1,588 | 1,269 | |||||
Shareholders funds | 4,970 | 5,630 | 3,835 | 3,508 | ||||||
(a) | Prepared under UK GAAP. |
(b) | Prepared under Australian GAAP. In relation to Rio Tinto Limited, the only significant measurement difference between Australian and UK GAAP is that of proposed dividends, which is described further on page 85. |
(c) | The Group companies to which amounts are owed include subsidiaries of Rio Tinto Limited and a subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc. |
(d) | On the basis that it is anticipated that Rio Tinto Limited will become the head entity of a tax group under the Australian tax consolidation regime, with effect from 1 January 2003, Rio Tinto Limited has recognised additional assets and liabilities in respect of current and deferred taxation previously attributable to subsidiaries. The transfer of these balances has given rise to corresponding changes in intragroup liabilities and assets. |
The accounts on pages 82 to 134 were approved by the directors on 20 February 2004 and signed on their behalf by:
Paul
Skinner Chairman |
Leigh
Clifford Chief executive |
Guy
Elliott Finance director |
||
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 129 |
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
43 | OTHER PARENT COMPANY DISCLOSURES |
Rio Tinto plc (a) | Rio Tinto Limited (b) | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
US$m | US$m | A$m | A$m | |||||
Fixed asset investments | ||||||||
Shares in Group companies and, for Rio Tinto Limited, other investments: | ||||||||
At 1 January | 2,235 | 2,235 | 2,586 | 2,528 | ||||
Additions | – | – | 126 | 58 | ||||
At 31 December | 2,235 | 2,235 | 2,712 | 2,586 | ||||
Loans to Group companies: | ||||||||
At 1 January | 2,542 | 2,767 | 5,573 | 6,274 | ||||
(Repayments)/advances | (1,187 | ) | (225 | ) | 301 | (701 | ) | |
At 31 December | 1,355 | 2,542 | 5,874 | 5,573 | ||||
Total | 3,590 | 4,777 | 8,586 | 8,159 | ||||
Deferred taxation (liability)/asset on a full provision basis | ||||||||
At 1 January | (44 | ) | (36 | ) | 23 | 26 | ||
Charged to profit and loss account | (2 | ) | (8 | ) | (17 | ) | (3 | ) |
Share of disputed tax paid (j) | – | – | 73 | – | ||||
Recognition of subsidiary deferred tax balances due to tax consolidation (d) | – | – | (664 | ) | – | |||
At 31 December (relating to timing differences) | (46 | ) | (44 | ) | (585 | ) | 23 | |
Share capital account | ||||||||
At 1 January | 154 | 154 | 1,703 | 1,693 | ||||
Issue of shares | 1 | – | 8 | 10 | ||||
At 31 December | 155 | 154 | 1,711 | 1,703 | ||||
Share premium account | ||||||||
At 1 January | 1,610 | 1,600 | ||||||
Premium on issues of ordinary shares | 19 | 10 | ||||||
At 31 December | 1,629 | 1,610 | ||||||
Other reserves | ||||||||
At 1 January and 31 December | 211 | 211 | 536 | 536 | ||||
Profit and loss account | ||||||||
At 1 January | 3,655 | 4,252 | 1,269 | 793 | ||||
Retained (loss)/profit for year | (680 | ) | (597 | ) | 319 | 476 | ||
At 31 December | 2,975 | 3,655 | 1,588 | 1,269 | ||||
Contingent liabilities | ||||||||
Bank and other performance guarantees | 5,300 | 4,545 | 5,527 | 5,033 | ||||
(a) | Prepared under UK GAAP. |
(b) | Prepared under Australian GAAP (see note (b) on page 129). |
(c) | Profit after tax for the year dealt with in the profit and loss account of the Rio Tinto plc parent company amounted to US$3 million (2002: US$42 million). As permitted by section 230 of the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985, no profit and loss account for the Rio Tinto plc parent company is shown. |
(d) | See note (d) on page 129. |
(e) | Pursuant to the DLC merger both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited issued deed poll guarantees by which each guaranteed contractual obligations incurred by the other or guaranteed by the other. These guarantees are excluded from the figures above. |
(f) | Bank and other performance guarantees relate principally to the obligations of subsidiary companies. |
(g) | The Group has a US$3 billion European Medium Term Note programme. Amounts utilised by subsidiary companies under this programme are guaranteed by the parent companies and were US$1.6 billion at the year end. |
(h) | Auditors remuneration for the audit of Rio Tinto plc was US$0.8 million (2002: US$0.6 million). |
(i) | In relation to Rio Tinto Limited, the only significant measurement difference between Australian and UK GAAP is that of proposed dividends, which is described further on page 85. |
(j) | Note 29 provides information regarding tax assessments issued to Group companies. |
130 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
44 | RIO TINTO LIMITED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT |
Rio Tinto Limited (a) | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
A$m | A$m | |||
Dividend income | 593 | 1,270 | ||
(Increase)/decrease in provision against carrying value of investments | 177 | (42 | ) | |
Other operating costs | (42 | ) | (45 | ) |
Operating profit | 728 | 1,183 | ||
Interest receivable and similar charges | 126 | 173 | ||
Interest payable and similar charges | (38 | ) | (63 | ) |
Profit on ordinary activities before taxation | 816 | 1,293 | ||
Taxation | (14 | ) | (20 | ) |
Retained profit for the financial year | 802 | 1,273 | ||
(a) | Prepared under Australian GAAP (see note (b) on page 129). |
45 | RIO TINTO LIMITED CASH FLOW STATEMENT |
Rio Tinto Limited (a) | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
A$m | A$m | |||
Operating profit | 728 | 1,183 | ||
Provisions | (177 | ) | 42 | |
Cash flow from operating activities | 551 | 1,225 | ||
Interest received | 125 | 172 | ||
Interest paid | (59 | ) | (62 | ) |
Returns on investment and servicing of finance | 66 | 110 | ||
Taxation | (80 | ) | 2 | |
Funding of related parties repaid/(advanced) | 2,266 | (26 | ) | |
Funding of other entities repaid | 15 | 6 | ||
Capital expenditure and financial investment | 2,281 | (20 | ) | |
Purchase of investments | (17 | ) | (103 | ) |
Sale of investments | – | 4 | ||
Acquisitions less disposals | (17 | ) | (99 | ) |
Equity dividends paid to Rio Tinto Limited shareholders | (742 | ) | (917 | ) |
Cash inflow before management of liquid resources and financing | 2,059 | 301 | ||
Ordinary shares in Rio Tinto Limited issued for cash | 7 | 10 | ||
Loans (repaid) less received | (2,066 | ) | (311 | ) |
Management of liquid resources and financing | (2,059 | ) | (301 | ) |
Increase in cash | – | – | ||
(a) | Prepared under Australian GAAP (see note (b) on page 129). |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 131 |
Financial information by business unit
Gross turnover (a) | EBITDA (b) | Net earnings (c) | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Interest | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
% | US$m | US$m | US$ | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Iron Ore | ||||||||||||||
Hamersley (inc. HIsmelt®) | 100.0 | 1,329 | 1,117 | 711 | 676 | 424 | 401 | |||||||
Robe River | 53.0 | 374 | 240 | 213 | 160 | 68 | 54 | |||||||
Iron Ore Company of Canada | 58.7 | 442 | 400 | 47 | 25 | 7 | (3 | ) | ||||||
2,145 | 1,757 | 971 | 861 | 499 | 452 | |||||||||
Energy | ||||||||||||||
Kennecott Energy | 100.0 | 955 | 949 | 236 | 267 | 88 | 90 | |||||||
Rio Tinto Coal Australia | 100.0 | 433 | 417 | 157 | 233 | 70 | 134 | |||||||
Kaltim Prima Coal | (d) | 142 | 216 | 74 | 79 | 31 | 26 | |||||||
Coal & Allied | 75.7 | 597 | 623 | 52 | 207 | (24 | ) | 68 | ||||||
Rössing | 68.6 | 86 | 112 | (33 | ) | 50 | (19 | ) | 23 | |||||
Energy Resources of Australia | 68.4 | 131 | 113 | 58 | 50 | 11 | 12 | |||||||
2,344 | 2,430 | 544 | 886 | 157 | 353 | |||||||||
Industrial Minerals | 1,801 | 1,847 | 465 | 717 | 154 | 286 | ||||||||
Aluminium | (e) | 1,936 | 1,662 | 488 | 510 | 200 | 256 | |||||||
Copper | ||||||||||||||
Kennecott Utah Copper | 100.0 | 722 | 755 | 230 | 236 | 88 | 86 | |||||||
Escondida | 30.0 | 502 | 283 | 284 | 121 | 122 | 32 | |||||||
Freeport | 13.1 | 344 | 306 | 169 | 139 | 23 | 19 | |||||||
Freeport joint venture | 40.0 | 397 | 349 | 225 | 215 | 104 | 113 | |||||||
Palabora | 49.2 | 206 | 201 | 20 | 53 | 1 | 12 | |||||||
Kennecott Minerals | 100.0 | 239 | 205 | 122 | 93 | 60 | 38 | |||||||
Rio Tinto Brasil | (f) | 139 | 115 | 48 | 40 | 48 | 16 | |||||||
Other Copper | (d) | 176 | 254 | 51 | 100 | (6 | ) | 25 | ||||||
2,725 | 2,468 | 1,149 | 997 | 440 | 341 | |||||||||
Diamonds | ||||||||||||||
Argyle | 100.0 | 434 | 372 | 198 | 175 | 72 | 63 | |||||||
Diavik | 60.0 | 122 | | 106 | | 41 | | |||||||
556 | 372 | 304 | 175 | 113 | 63 | |||||||||
Other operations | 184 | 208 | 77 | 81 | 21 | 25 | ||||||||
Product group total | 11,691 | 10,744 | 3,998 | 4,227 | 1,584 | 1,776 | ||||||||
Other items | 64 | 84 | (233 | ) | (137 | ) | (45 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
Exploration and evaluation | (127 | ) | (130 | ) | (98 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||||
Net interest | (59 | ) | (95 | ) | ||||||||||
Adjusted earnings | 1,382 | 1,530 | ||||||||||||
Exceptional items | 126 | (116 | ) | 126 | (879 | ) | ||||||||
Total | 11,755 | 10,828 | 3,764 | 3,844 | 1,508 | 651 | ||||||||
Depreciation & amortisation in subsidiaries | (1,006 | ) | (954 | ) | ||||||||||
Asset write-downs relating to subsidiaries & joint ventures | | (955 | ) | |||||||||||
Depreciation & amortisation in joint ventures and associates | (366 | ) | (333 | ) | ||||||||||
Profit on ordinary activities before interest and tax | 2,392 | 1,602 | ||||||||||||
(a) | Gross turnover includes 100 per cent of subsidiaries turnover and the Groups share of the turnover of joint ventures and associates. |
(b) | EBITDA of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates represents profit before: tax, net interest payable, depreciation and amortisation. |
(c) | Net earnings represent after tax earnings attributable to the Rio Tinto Group. Earnings of subsidiaries are stated before interest charges but after the amortisation of the discount related to provisions. Earnings attributable to joint ventures and associates include interest charges. |
(d) | During 2003, Rio Tinto sold its interests in Kaltim Prima Coal, Alumbrera and Peak. |
(e) | Includes Rio Tintos interest in Anglesey Aluminium (51 per cent) and Comalco (100 per cent). |
(f) | Includes Morro do Ouro in which Rio Tintos interest is 51 per cent and Fortaleza in which Rio Tintos interest was 99.9 per cent at 31 December 2003. |
(g) | Business units have been classified above according to the Groups management structure. Generally, this structure has regard to the primary product of each business unit but there are exceptions. For example, the Copper group includes certain gold operations. This summary differs, therefore, from the Product analysis in which the contributions of individual business units are attributed to several products as appropriate. |
(h) | The product group previously known as Diamonds & Gold has been redesignated the Diamonds group, with effect from 1 January 2003. Kennecott Minerals and Rio Tinto Brasil are now included in the Copper group. Kelian, Lihir, and Rio Tinto Zimbabwe are included in Other operations. In addition Anglesey Aluminium has been transferred from Copper to Aluminium. |
132 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Capital expenditure (j) | Depreciation & | Operating assets (l) | Employees (m) | |||||||||||||
amortisation (k) | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | Number | Number | |||||||||
Iron Ore | ||||||||||||||||
Hamersley (inc. HIsmelt®) | 298 | 79 | 110 | 94 | 1,543 | 923 | 2,169 | 2,006 | ||||||||
Robe River | 75 | 81 | 74 | 50 | 1,852 | 1,409 | 478 | 496 | ||||||||
Iron Ore Company of Canada | 37 | 39 | 29 | 35 | 489 | 416 | 1,884 | 1,936 | ||||||||
410 | 199 | 213 | 179 | 3,884 | 2,748 | 4,531 | 4,438 | |||||||||
Energy | ||||||||||||||||
Kennecott Energy | 168 | 152 | 105 | 128 | 561 | 486 | 1,776 | 1,710 | ||||||||
Rio Tinto Coal Australia | 92 | 126 | 52 | 37 | 649 | 406 | 755 | 679 | ||||||||
Kaltim Prima Coal | 2 | 5 | 16 | 21 | | 46 | 2,108 | 2,760 | ||||||||
Coal & Allied | 34 | 58 | 91 | 69 | 787 | 626 | 1,338 | 1,375 | ||||||||
Rössing | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 46 | 48 | 810 | 786 | ||||||||
Energy Resources of Australia | 5 | 4 | 30 | 23 | 178 | 140 | 238 | 262 | ||||||||
305 | 350 | 301 | 283 | 2,221 | 1,752 | 7,025 | 7,572 | |||||||||
Industrial Minerals | 139 | 133 | 172 | 158 | 2,038 | 2,063 | 6,581 | 6,723 | ||||||||
Aluminium | 436 | 269 | 169 | 137 | 3,258 | 2,365 | 4,223 | 3,929 | ||||||||
Copper | ||||||||||||||||
Kennecott Utah Copper | 83 | 97 | 92 | 129 | 1,277 | 1,378 | 1,406 | 1,596 | ||||||||
Escondida | 45 | 117 | 79 | 52 | 492 | 449 | 722 | 704 | ||||||||
Freeport | 33 | 23 | 54 | 50 | 144 | 128 | 1,165 | 1,445 | ||||||||
Freeport joint venture | 60 | 55 | 43 | 40 | 417 | 412 | ||||||||||
Palabora | 66 | 64 | 17 | 13 | 426 | 287 | 2,043 | 2,176 | ||||||||
Kennecott Minerals | 9 | 21 | 42 | 43 | 136 | 155 | 672 | 763 | ||||||||
Rio Tinto Brasil | 19 | 14 | (18 | ) | 11 | 138 | 91 | 1,393 | 1,320 | |||||||
Other Copper | 63 | 60 | 52 | 73 | 335 | 443 | 931 | 1,266 | ||||||||
378 | 451 | 361 | 411 | 3,365 | 3,343 | 8,332 | 9,270 | |||||||||
Diamonds | ||||||||||||||||
Argyle | 22 | 31 | 76 | 76 | 600 | 488 | 750 | 751 | ||||||||
Diavik | 78 | 206 | 34 | | 674 | 484 | 298 | 250 | ||||||||
100 | 237 | 110 | 76 | 1,274 | 972 | 1,048 | 1,001 | |||||||||
Other operations | 4 | 6 | 37 | 36 | 98 | 114 | 2,228 | 2,789 | ||||||||
Product group total | 1,772 | 1,645 | 1,363 | 1,280 | 16,138 | 13,357 | 33,968 | 35,722 | ||||||||
Other items | 17 | 13 | 9 | 7 | (455 | ) | (148 | ) | 2,048 | 1,451 | ||||||
Less: Joint ventures and associates (j) (k) | (181 | ) | (241 | ) | (366 | ) | (333 | ) | ||||||||
Total | 1,608 | 1,417 | 1,006 | 954 | 15,683 | 13,209 | 36,016 | 37,173 | ||||||||
Less: net debt | (5,646 | ) | (5,747 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net assets | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||||||||||||||
(i) |
From 1 January 2003 the way in which post retirement costs are attributed to business units, and consequently product groups, has been revised. The regular cost component of post retirement costs is included in business unit earnings and the balance of post retirement cost is recognised centrally in other items. The analyses of 2002 Net Earnings, EBITDA and Operating assets have been restated to reflect this allocation. There is no impact on Net earnings or Operating assets for the Group. |
(j) |
Capital expenditure comprises the net cash outflow on purchases less disposals of property, plant and equipment. The details provided include 100 per cent of subsidiaries capital expenditure and Rio Tintos share of the capital expenditure of joint ventures and associates. Amounts relating to joint ventures and associates not specifically funded by Rio Tinto are deducted before arriving at total capital expenditure for the Group. |
(k) |
Depreciation figures include 100 per cent of subsidiaries depreciation and amortisation of goodwill and include Rio Tintos share of the depreciation and goodwill amortisation of joint ventures and associates. Amounts relating to joint ventures and associates are deducted before arriving at the total depreciation charge. |
(l) |
Operating assets of subsidiaries comprise net assets before deducting net debt, less outside shareholders interests which are calculated by reference to the Net assets of the relevant companies (ie net of such companies debt). For joint ventures and associates, Rio Tintos net investment is shown. For joint ventures and associates shown above, Rio Tintos shares of operating assets, defined as for subsidiaries, are as follows: Escondida US$905 million (2002: US$913 million), Freeport joint venture US$417 million (2002: US$412 million), Freeport associate US$380 million (2002: US$533 million). |
(m) |
Employee numbers, which represent the average for the year, include 100 per cent of employees of subsidiary companies. Employee numbers for joint arrangements, joint ventures and associates are proportional to the Groups equity interest. Part time employees are included on a full time equivalent basis and people employed by contractors are not included. Temporary employees are included in employee numbers. Figures for 2002 have been restated. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 133 |
Australian Corporations Act summary of ASIC class order relief
Pursuant
to section 340 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Corporations Act), the
Australian Securities and Investments Commission issued an order dated
21 July 2003 that granted relief to Rio Tinto Limited from certain
requirements of the Corporations Act in relation to the Companys
financial statements. The order essentially continues the relief that
has applied to Rio Tinto Limited since the formation of the Groups
dual listed companies structure in 1995. The order applies to Rio Tinto
Limiteds
financial reporting obligations for financial years and half-years
ending between 30 June 2003 and 31 December 2004 (inclusive). In essence, the order allows Rio Tinto Limited to prepare, and to treat as the principal financial statements for it and its controlled entities, combined financial statements of Rio Tinto Limited and Rio Tinto plc and their respective controlled entities as if the Group constituted a single economic entity and the combined financial statements were consolidated financial statements. In addition, those combined financial statements are to be prepared: |
|
– | on the basis of merger, rather than acquisition, accounting under UK GAAP (ie on the basis that Rio Tinto Limited was not acquired by, and is not controlled by, Rio Tinto plc and that carrying amounts, rather than fair values, of assets and liabilities at the time of formation of the Groups dual listed companies structure were used to measure those assets and liabilities at formation); |
– | in accordance with the principles and requirements of UK GAAP, rather than Australian GAAP (except for one limited instance in the case of any concise report), and in accordance with United Kingdom financial reporting obligations generally; |
– | with United States dollars as the reporting currency (although translations to Australian dollars and United Kingdom pounds may be included, and translations to Australian dollars are required for a summary statement of financial position for the Group); and |
– | with a reconciliation of information from UK GAAP to Australian GAAP (see page 85). |
The combined financial statements must also be audited in accordance with relevant United Kingdom requirements. Rio Tinto Limited must also prepare a directors report which satisfies the content requirements of the Corporations Act (applied on the basis that the consolidated entity for those purposes is the Group). Rio Tinto Limited is also required to comply generally with the lodgement and distribution requirements of the Corporations Act (including timing requirements) in relation to the combined financial statements (including any concise report), the Auditors report and the Directors report.
Rio Tinto Limited is not required to prepare consolidated financial statements for it and its controlled entities. Rio Tinto Limited is required to prepare and lodge parent entity financial statements for itself in respect of each relevant financial year, in accordance with the principles and requirements of Australian GAAP and with Australian dollars as the reporting currency, and to have those statements audited. The statements are not required to be laid before the Companys annual general meeting or distributed to shareholders as a matter of course.
However, Rio Tinto Limited must: | |
– | include in the combined financial statements for the Group, as a note, summary parent entity financial statements for Rio Tinto Limited (ie summary statements of financial position, financial performance and cash flows), prepared in accordance with Australian GAAP and with Australian dollars as the reporting currency; and |
– | make available the full parent entity financial statement free of charge to shareholders on request, and also include a copy of them on the Companys website. |
The parent entity financial statements are available for download from the Rio Tinto website at www.riotinto.com. Shareholders may also request a copy free of charge by contacting the Rio Tinto Limited company secretary.
Directors Declaration
The financial statements and notes have been prepared in accordance with applicable United Kingdom law and accounting standards and other relevant financial reporting requirements and in accordance with applicable Australian law.
The financial statements and notes give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Rio Tinto Group, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited at 31 December 2003 and of the profit and cash flows of the Group for the year then ended.
In the directors opinion: | |
– | The financial statements and notes are in accordance with the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985 and the Australian Corporations Act 2001 as amended by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission order dated 21 July 2003. |
– | There are reasonable grounds to believe each of the Rio Tinto Group, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited has adequate financial resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and to pay its debts as and when they become due and and payable. |
By order of the board
Paul Skinner | Leigh Clifford | Guy Elliott |
Chairman | Chief executive | Finance director |
20 February 2004 | 20 February 2004 | 20 February 2004 |
134 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Independent auditors' report
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of the Rio Tinto Group as of 31 December 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated profit and loss statements, cash flow statements and statements of total recognised gains and losses for the years ended 31 December 2003 and 31 December 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Group’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Rio Tinto Group at 31 December 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended 31 December 2003 and 31 December 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | PricewaterhouseCoopers |
Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors | Chartered Accountants |
London, United Kingdom | Perth, Australia |
20 February 2004 | 20 February 2004 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 135 |
Summary financial data in Australian dollars, sterling and US dollars
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
A$m | A$m | £m | £m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
18,143 | 19,945 | 7,198 | 7,219 | Gross turnover (including share of | 11,755 | 10,828 | ||||||
joint ventures and associates) | ||||||||||||
3,232 | 2,415 | 1,282 | 874 | Profit on ordinary activities before taxation | 2,094 | 1,311 | ||||||
2,133 | 2,818 | 846 | 1,020 | Adjusted earnings (a) | 1,382 | 1,530 | ||||||
2,327 | 1,199 | 923 | 434 | Profit for the financial period (net earnings) | 1,508 | 651 | ||||||
169.0 | c | 87.1 | c | 67.1 | p | 31.5 | p | Earnings per ordinary share | 109.5 | c | 47.3 | c |
154.8 | c | 204.7 | c | 61.4 | p | 74.1 | p | Adjusted earnings per ordinary share (a) | 100.3 | c | 111.2 | c |
Dividends per share to Rio Tinto shareholders | ||||||||||||
37.13 | p | 37.47 | p | Rio Tinto plc | 64.0 | c | 60.0 | c | ||||
89.70 | c | 105.93 | c | Rio Tinto Limited | 64.0 | c | 60.0 | c | ||||
5,380 | 6,896 | 2,135 | 2,496 | Total cash flow from operations | 3,486 | 3,743 | ||||||
(2,582 | ) | (3,444 | ) | (1,024 | ) | (1,246 | ) | Capital expenditure and financial investment | (1,673 | ) | (1,870 | ) |
(7,540 | ) | (10,144 | ) | (3,170 | ) | (3,586 | ) | Net debt | (5,646 | ) | (5,747 | ) |
13,404 | 13,169 | 5,636 | 4,656 | Equity shareholders funds | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||||||
(a) | Adjusted earnings exclude profit on disposal of interests in subsidiary, joint venture and associate of US$126 million, and for 2002 excluded exceptional charges of US$879 million. |
(b) | The financial data above have been extracted from the primary financial statements set out on pages 82 to 84. The Australian dollar and sterling amounts are based on the US dollar amounts, retranslated at average or closing rates as appropriate, except for the dividends, which are the actual amounts payable. For further information on these exchange rates, please see page 122. |
136 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Supplementary information for United States investors
RECONCILIATION WITH US GAAP | 2003 | 2002 | ||
US$m | US$m | |||
Net earnings under UK GAAP | 1,508 | 651 | ||
Increase/(decrease) before tax in respect of: | ||||
Amortisation of goodwill subsidiaries and joint arrangements | 76 | 90 | ||
Amortisation of intangibles subsidiaries and joint arrangements | (40 | ) | (59 | ) |
Amortisation of intangibles equity accounted companies | (7 | ) | (9 | ) |
Exchange differences included in earnings under US GAAP | 1,019 | 240 | ||
Mark to market of certain derivative contracts | 287 | 157 | ||
Adjustments to asset carrying values | (32 | ) | (89 | ) |
Pensions/post retirement benefits | 59 | 1 | ||
Exploration and evaluation | (24 | ) | (17 | ) |
Share options | (21 | ) | (17 | ) |
Effect of historical average commodity prices in ore reserve determination | (82 | ) | | |
Start up costs | (31 | ) | (8 | ) |
Other | (125 | ) | (73 | ) |
Tax effect of above adjustments | (396 | ) | (114 | ) |
Other tax adjustments | (5 | ) | (13 | ) |
Outside shareholders interests in the above adjustments | (31 | ) | (159 | ) |
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 2,155 | 581 | ||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for close down and restoration costs | (178 | ) | | |
Net income under US GAAP | 1,977 | 581 | ||
Basic earnings per ordinary share under US GAAP | ||||
Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 156.4 | c | 42.2 | c |
After cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 143.5 | c | 42.2 | c |
Diluted earnings per ordinary share under US GAAP | ||||
Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 156.2 | c | 42.1 | c |
After cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 143.3 | c | 42.1 | c |
Shareholders funds under UK GAAP | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||
Increase/(decrease) before tax in respect of: | ||||
Goodwill subsidiaries and joint arrangements | 1,198 | 1,065 | ||
Goodwill equity accounted companies | 352 | 352 | ||
Intangibles subsidiaries and joint arrangements | 240 | 271 | ||
Intangibles equity accounted companies | 42 | 49 | ||
Mark to market of derivative contracts | 381 | (54 | ) | |
Adjustments to asset carrying values | 505 | 553 | ||
Pensions/post retirement benefits | (469 | ) | (472 | ) |
Exploration and evaluation | (180 | ) | (124 | ) |
Share options | (60 | ) | (38 | ) |
Effect of historical average commodity prices in ore reserve determination | (82 | ) | | |
Higher cost of sales resulting from acquisition accounting | (64 | ) | (49 | ) |
Provision for close down and restoration costs | 53 | 287 | ||
Start up costs | (156 | ) | (110 | ) |
Proposed dividends | 469 | 430 | ||
Other | (111 | ) | (18 | ) |
Tax effect of above adjustments | (102 | ) | (60 | ) |
Deferred tax on acquisitions: | ||||
Impact on mining property | 831 | 825 | ||
Impact on tax provisions | (831 | ) | (825 | ) |
Other tax adjustments | 69 | 74 | ||
Outside shareholders interests in the above adjustments | (78 | ) | (101 | ) |
Shareholders funds under US GAAP | 12,044 | 9,517 | ||
The Groups financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United Kingdom (UK GAAP), which differ in certain respects from those in the United States (US GAAP). These differences relate principally to the following items, and the effect of each of the adjustments to net earnings and shareholders funds that would be required under US GAAP is set out above.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 137 |
Supplementary information for United States investors continued
RECONCILIATION WITH US GAAP CONTINUED
Goodwill
For
1997 and prior years, UK GAAP permitted the write off of purchased goodwill on
acquisition, directly against reserves. For acquisitions in 1998 and subsequent
years, goodwill is capitalised and amortised over its expected useful life under
UK GAAP. Under US GAAP, goodwill is capitalised and, until 2001, was amortised
by charges against income over the period during which it was expected to be
of benefit, subject to a maximum of 40 years. Goodwill previously written off
directly to reserves in the UK GAAP financial statements was therefore reinstated
and amortised, under US GAAP. From 1 January 2002, goodwill and indefinite lived
intangible assets are no longer amortised under US GAAP but are reviewed annually
for impairment
under FAS 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill amortisation
of US$76 million charged against UK GAAP earnings for 2003 (2002: US$90 million)
is added back in the US GAAP reconciliation.
Intangible assets under US GAAP
The
implementation of FAS 141 resulted in the reclassification of US$340 million
from goodwill to finite lived intangible assets at 1 January 2002. The accumulated
cost relating to these intangible assets at 31 December 2003 was US$714 million
and accumulated amortisation was US$432 million. The total amortisation expense
was US$47 million of which US$16 million is related to the amortisation of goodwill
previously written off to reserves under UK GAAP now reclassified as finite lived
intangible assets under US GAAP. The remaining US$31 million relates to the amortisation
of goodwill included as an asset on the UK GAAP balance sheet but now reclassified
as finite lived intangible assets under US GAAP. The estimated amortisation charge
relating to intangible assets for each of the next five years is US$47 million.
Exchange differences included in earnings under US GAAP
The
Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars and a significant proportion
of the Groups US dollar debt is located in its Australian operations. Under
UK GAAP, this debt is dealt with in the context of the currency status of the
Group as a whole and exchange differences reported by the Australian operations
are adjusted through reserves. US GAAP permits such exchange gains and losses
to be taken to reserves only to the extent that the US dollar debt hedges US
dollar assets in the Australian Group. Exchange gains of US$1,019 million pre
tax (2002: US$240 million), US$623 million net of tax and minorities (2002: US$177
million net of tax and minorities), on US dollar debt that do not qualify for
hedge accounting under US GAAP have therefore been recorded in US GAAP earnings.
Mark to market
of derivative contracts
The
Group is party to derivative contracts in respect of some of its future transactions
in order to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates against the
US dollar. Under UK GAAP, these contracts are accounted for as hedges: gains
and losses are deferred and subsequently recognised when the hedged transaction
occurs. However, certain of the Groups derivative contracts do not qualify
for hedge accounting under FAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, principally because the hedge is not located in
the entity with the relevant exposure. Unrealised pre tax gains of US$182 million
(2002: US$148 million), US$115 million after tax and minorities (2002: US$104
million after tax and minorities), on such derivatives have therefore been recorded
in US GAAP earnings. Realised gains of US$105 million pre tax (2002: US$9 million
pre tax), US$75 million after tax and minorities (2002: US$6 million after tax
and minorities), which have been capitalised under UK GAAP have also been recorded
in earnings under US GAAP.
Adjustments to asset carrying values
Following
the implementation of FRS 11 in 1998, impairment of fixed assets under UK GAAP
is recognised and measured by reference to the discounted cash flows expected
to be generated by an income generating unit. Under US GAAP, impairment is recognised
only when the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover
the carrying value of the income generating unit. Where an asset is found to
be impaired under US GAAP, the amount of such impairment is generally similar
under US GAAP to that computed under UK GAAP, except where the US GAAP carrying
value includes additional goodwill.
Under UK GAAP, impairment provisions may be written back in a future year if the expected recoverable amount of the asset increases. Such write backs of provisions are not permitted under US GAAP. Therefore, any credits to UK GAAP earnings resulting from such write backs are reversed in the reconciliation to US GAAP.
Pensions/post retirement benefits
Under
UK GAAP, post retirement benefits are accounted for in accordance with Statement
of Standard Accounting Practice 24. The expected costs under defined benefit
arrangements are spread over the service lives of employees entitled to those
benefits. Variations from the regular cost are spread on a straight line basis
over the expected average remaining service lives of relevant current employees.
Under US GAAP, the annual pension cost comprises the estimated cost of benefits
accruing in the period adjusted for the amortisation of the surplus arising when
FAS 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions, was adopted. The
charge is further adjusted to reflect the cost of benefit improvements and any
surpluses/deficits that emerge as a result of variances from actuarial assumptions.
For US purposes, only those surpluses/deficits outside a ten per cent fluctuation corridor are
spread.
The
reductions in shareholders funds at 31 December 2003 and 2002 also
include the effect of the US GAAP requirement to make immediate provision
for pension fund deficits through other comprehensive income. The provision
reflects the reduction in equity values over recent years.
Mandatory
implementation of FRS 17, Retirement Benefits, has been delayed
until 2005 but additional disclosures are required for 2001 onwards, which
are included in note 41 to the financial statements.
Exploration and evaluation
Under
UK GAAP, expenditure on a project can be carried forward after it has reached
a stage where there is a high degree of confidence in its viability. US GAAP
does not allow expenditure to be carried forward unless the viability of the
project is supported by a final feasibility study. In addition, under UK GAAP,
provisions made against exploration and evaluation in prior years can be reversed
when the project proceeds to development, to the extent that the relevant costs
are recoverable. US GAAP does not allow such provisions to be reversed.
Share option plans
Under
UK GAAP, no cost is accrued where the option scheme applies to all relevant employees
and the intention is to satisfy the share options by the issuance of new shares.
Under the fair value recognition provisions of FAS 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, the fair value of the options is determined using
an option pricing model.
138 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
RECONCILIATION WITH US GAAP CONTINUED
Effect of historical average commodity prices in ore reserve determination
For UK and
Australian reporting, the Groups ore reserve estimates are determined in
accordance with the JORC code and are based on forecasts of future commodity
prices. During 2003, the SEC formally indicated that, for US reporting, historical
price data should be used. The application of historical prices has led to reduced
ore reserve quantities for US reporting purposes for certain of the Groups
operations, which results in lower earnings for US reporting, largely as a result
of higher depreciation charges. Details of the differences in ore reserves used
for US reporting are set out on page 147.
Higher cost of sales resulting from acquisition accounting
Under UK
GAAP, the inventories of acquired companies are valued at the lower of replacement
cost and net realisable value. Under US GAAP, such inventories are recognised
at the time of acquisition on the basis of expected net sales proceeds. There
is no effect on 2003 earnings.
Provisions for close down and restoration costs
FAS
143 Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations has been implemented
with effect from 1 January 2003. Under this US standard, provision is made in
the accounting period when the related environmental disturbance occurs, based
on the net present value of estimated future costs. The costs so recognised are
capitalised and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related asset.
In each subsequent year, the discount applied to the provision unwinds,
resulting in a charge to the profit and loss account for the year and an increase
in the present value of the provision. This accounting treatment is broadly similar
to Rio Tintos established policy under UK GAAP. Consequently, the pre tax
adjustment to the Provision for close down and restoration costs included
in the above reconciliation at 31 December 2002 has now been substantially reduced
through the cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle.
Start up costs
Under
US GAAP, Statement of Position 98-5, Reporting on the Costs of Start up
Activities, requires that the costs of start up activities are expensed
as incurred. Under UK GAAP, some of these start up costs qualify for capitalisation
and are amortised over the economic lives of the relevant assets.
Proposed dividends
Under
UK GAAP, ordinary dividends are recognised in the financial year in respect of
which they are paid. Under US GAAP, such dividends are not recognised until they
are formally declared by the board of directors or approved by the shareholders.
Other
Other
adjustments include amounts relating to differences between UK and US accounting
principles in respect of depreciation of mining assets, revenue recognition and
unrealised holding gains and losses.
Depreciation
of mining assets Under UK GAAP, mining assets are fully depreciated over their economic lives or the remaining life of the mine if shorter. In some cases, mineral resources that do not yet have the status of reserves are taken into account in determining depreciation charges, where there is a high degree of confidence that they will be mined economically. For US GAAP, only proven and probable reserves are
taken into account in the calculation of depreciation, depletion and amortisation
charges. As a result, adjustments have been made to depreciation reducing
US GAAP pre tax earnings by US$59 million (2002: US$10 million).
Revenue
recognition Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101) Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements has the result that, in some cases, sales recorded as revenue under UK GAAP are deferred and are not recognised as revenue under US GAAP until a future accounting period. Occasionally, sales of goods recorded as revenue for UK GAAP purposes may be kept in store by Rio Tinto at the request of the buyer. Under US GAAP, such transactions cannot be recognised as revenue unless the goods are physically segregated from the suppliers
other inventory and certain additional criteria are met. In 2003, such timing
differences resulted in a reduction in US GAAP pre tax earnings of US$17
million (2002: US$4 million increase).
Unrealised
holding gains and losses UK GAAP permits current asset investments to be valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Under US GAAP, FAS 115 requires that unrealised holding gains and losses on investments classified as available for sale are reported within a separate component of shareholders funds
and excluded from earnings until realised.
Taxation
Under
UK GAAP, provision for taxes arising on remittances of earnings can only be made
if the dividends have been accrued or if there is a binding agreement for the
distribution of the earnings. Under US GAAP, provision must be made for tax arising
on expected future remittances of past earnings.
Under UK GAAP, deferred tax is not provided in respect of upward fair value adjustments to tangible fixed assets and inventories made on acquisitions. Under US GAAP, deferred tax must be provided on all fair value adjustments to non monetary assets recorded on acquisition with a consequential increase in the amount allocated to mining properties or goodwill as appropriate.
Under UK GAAP, tax benefits associated with goodwill charged directly to reserves in 1997 and previous years, must be accumulated in the deferred tax provision. This means that the tax benefits are not included in earnings until the related goodwill is charged through the profit and loss account on disposal or closure. For US GAAP, no provision is required for such deferred tax because the goodwill that gave rise to these tax benefits was capitalised and gives rise to amortisation charges against profit.
Consolidated statement of cash flows
The
consolidated statement of cash flows prepared in accordance with FRS 1 (revised)
presents substantially the same information as that required under US GAAP. Under
US GAAP, however, there are certain differences from UK GAAP with regard to the
classification of items within the cash flow statement and with regard to the
definition of cash and cash equivalents. Under US GAAP, tax paid and interest
would form part of operating cash flow. Under UK GAAP, cash for the purposes
of the cash flow statement is defined as cash in hand and deposits repayable
on demand with any qualifying financial institution, less bank borrowings from
any qualifying financial institution repayable on demand.
Deposits are repayable on demand if they can be withdrawn at any time without notice and without penalty or if a maturity or period of notice of not more than 24 hours or one working day has been agreed. Under US GAAP, cash equivalents comprise cash balances and current asset investments with an original maturity of less than three months and exclude bank borrowings repayable on demand.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 139 |
Supplementary information for United States investors continued
RECONCILIATION WITH US GAAP CONTINUED
Adjusted earnings
As
permitted under UK GAAP, adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share have
been presented excluding the impact of exceptional items to provide a measure
that reflects the underlying performance of the Group. This is in addition to
the presentation of earnings and earnings per share, which include the exceptional
items. In accordance with US GAAP, earnings and earnings per share have been
presented based on US GAAP earnings, without adjustment for the impact of exceptional
items. Such additional measures of underlying performance are not permitted under
US GAAP.
Variable Interest Entities
In January
2003, the FASB issued interpretation No. 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities (FIN 46). Under FIN 46, certain entities labelled Variable
Interest Entities (VIE), must be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of
the entity. The primary beneficiary is generally defined as the party exposed
to the majority of the risks and rewards arising from the VIE. For VIEs
in which a significant variable interest is held that is not a majority interest,
certain disclosures are required. Full implementation of this interpretation
is required in the Groups financial statements for the year to 31 December
2004.
The
Group has a 20 per cent general partnership interest in the Colowyo limited
partnership, which was acquired for US$25 million in December 1994. This
joint venture may fall within the definition of a Variable Interest Entity
set out in FIN 46. The Colowyo joint venture produces coal, which is sold
under long term contracts. Colowyos total sales revenues for 2003 were
US$101 million and its total assets as at
31
December 2003 were US$100 million. It is included in the Group accounts on the
equity accounting basis and the carrying value of the net investment at 31 December
2003 was US$27 million under US GAAP.
Colowyo has bonds in issue with outstanding capital of US$163 million at 31 December 2003. These are repayable by instalments up to 2016 with interest at rates between 9.56 per cent and 10.19 per cent per annum. The bonds are to be serviced and repaid exclusively out of the net revenues from certain specified sales contracts relating to coal supplies by Colowyo. The bondholders bear the risks of loss that might arise if the revenues are interrupted due to failure of the purchasers or force majeure. The Rio Tinto Group is responsible under a management contract in which it agreed, for the sole and exclusive benefit of the bondholders, to cause Colowyo to perform its obligations under the specified coal sales contracts.
ADDITIONAL US GAAP CASH FLOW INFORMATION
A summary
of Rio Tintos operating, investing and financing activities classified
in accordance with US GAAP is presented below:
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Net cash flow from operating activities | 2,292 | 2,720 | ||
Net cash flow from investing activities | (1,268 | ) | (1,743 | ) |
Net cash flow from financing activities | (954 | ) | (1,151 | ) |
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents per US GAAP | 70 | (174 | ) | |
Decrease in cash per UK GAAP | (83 | ) | (130 | ) |
Decrease/(increase) in non qualifying liquid resources for US GAAP | 120 | (27 | ) | |
Increase/(decrease) in bank borrowings repayable on demand included in cash under UK GAAP | 33 | (17 | ) | |
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents per US GAAP | 70 | (174 | ) | |
Cash per balance sheet under UK GAAP | 395 | 325 | ||
Qualifying liquid resources less non qualifying deposits | (36 | ) | (45 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents under US GAAP | 359 | 280 | ||
There was an exchange gain of US$9 million (2002: loss of US$42 million) relating to US GAAP cash and cash equivalents during the year. | ||||
ACCUMULATED FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION GAINS AND LOSSES RECORDED DIRECTLY IN SHAREHOLDERS FUNDS UNDER US GAAP | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
At 1 January | (1,014 | ) | (1,436 | ) |
Movement in period | 1,301 | 422 | ||
At 31 December | 287 | (1,014 | ) | |
140 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
RECONCILIATION WITH US GAAP CONTINUED
UNREALISED HOLDING GAINS AND LOSSES
The
following table shows the Groups investments in debt and equity securities which are held as available for sale in
accordance with FAS 115:
FAS 115 | Unrealised | Unrealised | Market | Net | ||||||
net book | holding | holding | value | unrealised | ||||||
value | gains | losses | holding | |||||||
gains | ||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||
At 1 January 2003 | 70 | 5 | (5 | ) | 70 | | ||||
Change in unrealised holding gains/(losses) | | 14 | (1 | ) | 13 | 13 | ||||
Additions and other movements | 9 | | | 9 | | |||||
At 31 December 2003 | 79 | 19 | (6 | ) | 92 | 13 | ||||
ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
During
2003, the following movements, before tax and minorities, took place in Other
Comprehensive Income (OCI) and earnings in relation to derivatives:
Derivative | Recorded | Recorded | ||||
assets less | in OCI | in retained | ||||
liabilities | earnings | |||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||
Net derivative (liabilities)/assets on balance sheet at 31 December 2002 | (54 | ) | (60 | ) | 6 | |
Less: net derivative liabilities marked to market through OCI at 1 January 2003 | ||||||
relating to contracts maturing in 2003 (a) | 9 | 9 | | |||
Less: net derivative assets marked to market through retained earnings at | ||||||
1 January 2003 relating to contracts maturing in 2003 (b) | (34 | ) | | (34 | ) | |
Add: mark to market of net derivative assets designated as FAS 133 | ||||||
cash flow hedges at 31 December 2003 (c) | 139 | 139 | | |||
Add: mark to market of net derivative assets not designated as hedges under | ||||||
FAS 133 at 31 December 2003 (d) | 207 | | 207 | |||
On balance sheet at 31 December 2003 | 267 | 88 | 179 | |||
(a) | During 2003, net losses of US$9 million relating to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges under FAS 133 were transferred from accumulated OCI to US GAAP earnings on maturity of the contracts. |
(b) | During 2003, accrued gains of US$34 million relating to derivatives that were not designated as hedges under FAS 133 were realised on maturity of the contracts. |
(c) | The fair value of net derivative liabilities designated as cash flow hedges under FAS 133 reduced by US$148 million during 2003, resulting in a closing asset balance related to cash flow hedging activities of US$88 million in OCI. These cash flow hedges hedge the Groups exposure to the US dollar in relation to future trading transactions. The Group expects to reclassify US$43 million of this amount as increases in earnings over the next 12 months as these contracts and the transactions which they hedge mature. As at 31 December 2003, the Group had US$144 million of cash flow hedge derivative assets and US$56 million of cash flow hedge derivative liabilities. The cash flow hedges extend to 2010. |
(d) | Certain of the Groups derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133, principally because the hedge is not located in the entity with the exposure. The fair value of these net derivative assets increased by US$173 million during 2003. As at 31 December 2003, the Group had US$197 million of assets relating to derivatives which do not qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133, and US$18 million of liabilities. |
DEFERRED TAX CREDIT/(CHARGE) | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
The credit/(charge) for deferred taxation arises as follows: | ||||
accelerated capital allowances | (83 | ) | 186 | |
pension prepayments | 48 | 11 | ||
provisions | (24 | ) | 6 | |
provision against AMT credits and US tax losses | 50 | (228 | ) | |
other timing differences | 34 | 41 | ||
25 | 16 | |||
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 141 |
Supplementary information for United States investors continued
RECONCILIATION WITH US GAAP CONTINUED
FIXED ASSET INVESTMENTS
The aggregated profit and loss accounts and balance sheets of equity and gross equity accounted companies on a 100 per cent basis are set out below:
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Profit and loss account: | ||||
Sales revenue | 7,078 | 6,622 | ||
Cost of sales | (4,652 | ) | (4,384 | ) |
Operating profit | 2,426 | 2,238 | ||
Net interest | (317 | ) | (377 | ) |
Profit before tax | 2,109 | 1,861 | ||
Taxation | (714 | ) | (579 | ) |
Profit attributable to outside shareholders | (48 | ) | (36 | ) |
Net profit on ordinary activities (100 per cent basis) | 1,347 | 1,246 | ||
Balance sheet: | ||||
Intangible fixed assets | 64 | 194 | ||
Tangible fixed assets | 11,406 | 12,086 | ||
Investments | 78 | 166 | ||
Working capital | 775 | 593 | ||
Net cash less current debt | 319 | (835 | ) | |
12,642 | 12,204 | |||
Long term debt | (5,066 | ) | (5,406 | ) |
Provisions | (1,462 | ) | (1,658 | ) |
Outside shareholders interests | (321 | ) | (290 | ) |
Aggregate shareholders funds (100 per cent basis) | 5,793 | 4,850 | ||
Actual stripping | Life of mine | |||||||
ratio for year | stripping ratio | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
Kennecott Utah Copper (2014) | 1.86 | 2.05 | 1.24 | 1.19 | ||||
Borax (2037) | 23.00 | 25.00 | 16.00 | 16.00 | ||||
Argyle Diamonds (2007) | 6.10 | 7.29 | 4.10 | 4.40 | ||||
Freeport Joint Venture (2014) | 2.84 | 2.35 | 1.93 | 1.77 |
In addition, Escondida, Rio Tintos 30 per cent owned joint venture, defers stripping costs based on the ratio of waste to pounds of copper. The actual stripping ratio for 2003 was 0.1015 (2002: 0.1458). The life of mine stripping ratio for 2003 was 0.1103 (2002: 0.1094). The deferred stripping balance is expected to be fully amortised in 2039.
142 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
ADDITIONAL SHARE CAPITAL INFORMATION | Rio Tinto plc | Rio Tinto plc | Rio Tinto plc | |||||||||
Share Savings | Executive Share | Share Option | ||||||||||
Plan | Option Scheme | Plan | ||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||
average | average | average | ||||||||||
exercise | exercise | exercise | ||||||||||
price | price | price | ||||||||||
Number | £ | Number | £ | Number | £ | |||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January 2003 | 2,079,845 | 8.14 | 62,000 | 8.49 | 7,186,254 | 11.35 | ||||||
Granted | 390,518 | 11.21 | | | 2,305,406 | 12.63 | ||||||
Exercised | (367,866 | ) | 8.47 | (39,000 | ) | 8.41 | (1,009,307 | ) | 8.50 | |||
Cancelled | (182,067 | ) | 9.06 | | | (797,927 | ) | 13.05 | ||||
Expired | | | | | (21,501 | ) | 12.98 | |||||
Options outstanding at 31 December 2003 | 1,920,430 | 8.61 | 23,000 | 8.61 | 7,662,925 | 11.93 | ||||||
Rio Tinto Limited | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||||||||
Share Savings Plan | Share Option Plan | |||||||||||
Number | Weighted average exercise price A$ |
Number | Weighted average exercise price A$ |
|||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January 2003 | 2,246,174 | 26.59 | 2,439,330 | 33.42 | ||||||||
Granted | 384,180 | 27.48 | 1,242,475 | 33.34 | ||||||||
Exercised | (12,588 | ) | 27.67 | (58,975 | ) | 22.04 | ||||||
Cancelled | (232,313 | ) | 26.76 | (18,197 | ) | 33.76 | ||||||
Expired | | | (2,496 | ) | 33.01 | |||||||
Options outstanding at 31 December 2003 | 2,385,453 | 26.71 | 3,602,137 | 33.58 | ||||||||
The weighted average remaining contractual lives of options outstanding at 31 December 2003 for the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plan, the Rio Tinto plc Share Option Plan, the Rio Tinto Limited Share Option Plan and the Rio Tinto Limited Share Savings Plan are two, seven, eight and three years respectively. The weighted average fair values of options granted during the year for the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plan, the Rio Tinto plc Share Option Plan, the Rio Tinto Limited Share Option Plan and the Rio Tinto Limited Share Savings Plan are £4.20, £2.68, A$6.01 and A$10.90 respectively.
ADDITIONAL SEGMENTAL INFORMATION
The following supplements segmental information provided elsewhere in this report to provide additional information required under US GAAP.
Tax charge by product group | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Iron Ore | (226 | ) | (215 | ) | |||||
Energy | (96 | ) | (197 | ) | |||||
Industrial Minerals | (93 | ) | (200 | ) | |||||
Aluminium | (106 | ) | (107 | ) | |||||
Copper | (223 | ) | (126 | ) | |||||
Diamonds | (76 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||
Other operations | (13 | ) | (16 | ) | |||||
Tax on exploration | 17 | 18 | |||||||
Other items, including tax relief on asset write-downs | 249 | 168 | |||||||
(567 | ) | (708 | ) | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment by location | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||
% | % | US$m | US$m | ||||||
North America | 36.2 | 42.7 | 5,504 | 5,204 | |||||
Australia and New Zealand | 54.6 | 48.5 | 8,290 | 5,912 | |||||
South America | 1.1 | 0.9 | 168 | 112 | |||||
Africa | 5.6 | 5.0 | 851 | 608 | |||||
Indonesia | 0.2 | 0.4 | 28 | 50 | |||||
Europe and other countries | 2.3 | 2.5 | 355 | 297 | |||||
100.0 | 100.0 | 15,196 | 12,183 | ||||||
COVENANTS
Of the Rio Tinto Groups medium and long term borrowings of US$3.8 billion,
some US$0.8 billion relates to the groups share of non recourse borrowings
which are the subject of various financial and general covenants with which
the respective borrowers are in compliance.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 143 |
Supplementary information for United States investors continued
POST
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Information
in respect of the net periodic benefit cost and related obligation determined
in accordance with US Statements of Financial
Accounting
Standards 87, 106 and 132 is given below. The measurement date used to establish
year end asset values and benefit obligations was 30 September 2003. The previous
measurement date, used to determine 2003 costs, was 30 September 2002.
Benefits
under the major pension plans are principally determined by years of service
and employee remuneration. The Groups largest defined benefit pension
plans are in the UK, Australia and the US and a description of the investment
policies and strategies followed is set out below.
In the UK and the US, the investment strategy is determined by the pension plan trustee and investment committee respectively, after consulting the company. Agreed investment policies aim to ensure that the objectives are met in a prudent manner, consistent with established guidelines. The investment objectives include generating a return that exceeds consumer price and wage inflation over the long term. Ranges for the proportions to be held in each asset class have been agreed; a substantial proportion of the assets is invested in a spread of domestic and overseas equities, with a smaller proportion in fixed and variable income bonds, cash and, in the US, real estate. Risk is managed in various ways, including identifying investments considered to be unsuitable and placing limits on some types of investment. In particular, the funds are not allowed to invest directly in any Rio Tinto Group compa
ny.
In Australia, the investments reflect the various defined benefit and defined contribution liabilities and are primarily in Australian and overseas equities and fixed interest stocks.
At
30 September 2003, funded pension plans held assets invested in the following
proportions:
UK | US | Group | ||||
target | target | * | actual | |||
Equities | 45%-85% | 65 | % | 65 | % | |
Debt securities | 15%-45% | 30 | % | 27 | % | |
Real estate | | 5 | % | 3 | % | |
Other | 0%-10% | | 5 | % | ||
* plus or minus 5% |
The split of pension investments at 30 September 2002 is not readily available.
However, a summary as at 31 December 2002 is set out in the FRS17 transitional
disclosures on page 126.
The
expected rate of return on pension plan assets is determined as managements best estimate of the long term return of the major asset classes equity, debt, real estate and other weighted
by the actual allocation of assets among the categories at the measurement
date.
Pension
plan funding policy is based on annual contributions at a rate that is
intended to fund benefits as a level percentage of pay over the working
lifetime of a plans participants, subject to local statutory minimum
contribution requirements. Details of anticipated contributions in 2004
are set out in the FRS 17 transitional disclosures on page 126.
Assumptions
used to determine the net periodic benefit cost and the end of year benefit
obligation for the major pension plans varied between the limits shown
below. The average rate for each assumption has been weighted by benefit
obligation. The assumptions used to determine the end of year benefit obligation
are also used to calculate the following years cost.
2003 cost | Year end benefit obligation | |
Discount rate | 5.8% to 12.0% (Average: 6.7%) | 5.4% to 9.5% (Average: 5.9%) |
Long term rate of return on plan assets | 6.5% to 12.0% (Average: 7.2%) | 6.3% to 11.0% (Average: 6.6%) |
Increase in compensation levels | 3.3% to 11.0% (Average: 4.8%) | 3.7% to 6.5% (Average: 4.2%) |
The actuarial calculations in respect of the UK plans assume a rate of increase
of pensions in payment of 2.6 per cent per annum. This assumption is consistent
with the expected rates of return and salary increase assumptions in the respective
valuations. Appropriate assumptions were made for plans in other countries.
Other post retirement benefits are provided to employees who meet the eligibility requirements, and their beneficiaries and dependants, through unfunded self insurance arrangements. The majority of these plans are for employees in the United States. The plans are non contributory, although some contain an element of cost sharing such as deductibles and co-insurance.
The weighted average assumptions used in determining the costs and year end benefit obligation for the major post retirement benefit plans other than pension plans were as below:
Cost | Year end benefit obligation | |
Discount rate |
6.5% (2002: 6.5%) | 6.1% (2002: 6.5%) |
Healthcare cost trend rate | 8.0% reducing to 5.0% by | 11.2% reducing to 4.7% by |
2009 (2002: 8.5% reducing | 2011 (2002: 8.0% reducing | |
to 5.0% by 2009) | to 5.0% by 2009) |
144 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Components of net benefit expense | ||||||||
Pension benefits | Other benefits | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
Defined benefit plans | ||||||||
Service cost | (123 | ) | (97 | ) | (9 | ) | (7 | ) |
Interest cost on benefit obligation | (210 | ) | (207 | ) | (28 | ) | (25 | ) |
Expected return on plan assets | 252 | 258 | | | ||||
Net amortisation and deferral: | ||||||||
transitional obligation | 10 | 10 | | | ||||
recognised (losses)/gains | (6 | ) | 10 | 5 | 8 | |||
prior service cost recognised | (23 | ) | (22 | ) | 1 | 1 | ||
Total net amortisation and deferral | (19 | ) | (2 | ) | 6 | 9 | ||
Net periodic benefit cost | (100 | ) | (48 | ) | (31 | ) | (23 | ) |
Curtailment (charge)/credit | | (8 | ) | 3 | (2 | ) | ||
Net benefit expense | (100 | ) | (56 | ) | (28 | ) | (25 | ) |
The 2003 pension cost recognised for defined contribution plans, of US$9 million (2002: US$5 million), is included in the above. | ||||||||
FUNDED STATUS OF THE GROUPS PRINCIPAL SCHEMES | ||||||||
Pension benefits | Other benefits | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
Benefit obligation at end of year (see below) | (4,161 | ) | (3,366 | ) | (563 | ) | (437 | ) |
Fair value of plan assets | 3,835 | 3,166 | | | ||||
Benefit obligations in excess of plan assets | (326 | ) | (200 | ) | (563 | ) | (437 | ) |
Unrecognised prior service cost | 144 | 159 | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||
Unrecognised net loss/(gain) | 622 | 464 | 54 | (40 | ) | |||
Unrecognised transitional asset | (11 | ) | (29 | ) | | | ||
Company contributions in fourth quarter | 29 | 7 | 5 | | ||||
Net amount recognised at end of year | 458 | 401 | (506 | ) | (479 | ) | ||
Comprising: | ||||||||
benefit prepayment | 414 | 346 | | | ||||
benefit provision | (409 | ) | (319 | ) | (506 | ) | (479 | ) |
intangible asset | 53 | 53 | | | ||||
58 | 80 | (506 | ) | (479 | ) | |||
amount recognised through accumulated other comprehensive income | 400 | 321 | | | ||||
Net amount recognised in retained earnings | 458 | 401 | (506 | ) | (479 | ) | ||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
US$m | US$m | |||||||
Change in additional minimum liability before tax | ||||||||
Accrued pension benefit expense | 79 | 221 | ||||||
Increase in intangible asset | | (21 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income before tax | 79 | 200 | ||||||
Pension benefits | Other benefits | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
Change in benefit obligation | ||||||||
Benefit obligation at start of year | (3,366 | ) | (2,803 | ) | (437 | ) | (362 | ) |
Service cost | (112 | ) | (97 | ) | (9 | ) | (7 | ) |
Interest cost | (210 | ) | (207 | ) | (28 | ) | (25 | ) |
Contributions by plan participants | (26 | ) | (9 | ) | | | ||
Actuarial losses | (553 | ) | (204 | ) | (93 | ) | (48 | ) |
Benefits paid | 260 | 195 | 18 | 16 | ||||
Benefits bought out | 191 | | | | ||||
Plan amendments | (7 | ) | (16 | ) | 5 | (2 | ) | |
Settlement, curtailment and other gain/(loss) | 10 | | 3 | | ||||
Currency and other adjustments | (348 | ) | (225 | ) | (22 | ) | (9 | ) |
Benefit obligation at end of year | (4,161 | ) | (3,366 | ) | (563 | ) | (437 | ) |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 145 |
Supplementary information for United States investors continued
The benefit obligation shown above includes an allowance for future salary increases, where applicable; the accumulated benefit obligation does not include this allowance. The accumulated benefit obligations for pension plans at 30 September 2003 amounted to US$3,973 million. At 30 September 2002, the corresponding total of accumulated benefit obligations was US$3,025 million. For each plan, where the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of the assets and this deficit is greater than the amount provided, an increase in the provision is charged to other comprehensive income. To the extent that the deficit relates to previous benefit improvements an intangible asset is created which reduces the charge to other comprehensive income.
FUNDED STATUS OF THE GROUPS PRINCIPAL SCHEMES
Pension benefits | Other benefits | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
Change in plan assets | ||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at start of year | 3,166 | 3,188 | | | ||||
Actual return/(loss) on plan assets | 689 | (150 | ) | | | |||
Contributions by plan participants | 26 | 9 | | | ||||
Contributions by employer | 92 | 30 | 18 | 16 | ||||
Benefits paid | (260 | ) | (195 | ) | (18 | ) | (16 | ) |
Benefits bought out | (191 | ) | | | | |||
Settlement, curtailment and other gain/(loss) | (19 | ) | | | | |||
Currency and other adjustments | 332 | 284 | | | ||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | 3,835 | 3,166 | | | ||||
Sensitivity to change in healthcare trend | ||||||||
Changing the healthcare cost trend rates by 1% would result in the following effects: | ||||||||
1% increase | 1% decrease | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
(Increase)/decrease in service cost plus interest cost | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | 4 | 4 | ||
(Increase)/decrease in benefit obligation at 30 September | (68 | ) | (48 | ) | 60 | 40 | ||
Effect
of Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernisation Act of 2003
On
8 December 2003 the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernisation
Act of 2003 was signed into law in the US. The Act introduces a prescription
drug benefit (Medicare Part D) and a federal subsidy for sponsors of post retirement
healthcare plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent
to Medicare Part D. Specific guidance on the accounting impact of this Act is
pending and therefore, in line with the provisions of FSP FAS 106-1 the figures
disclosed in this note for post retirement healthcare do not reflect the effects
of the Act on any of the US post retirement healthcare arrangements. When final
guidance on accounting for the Act is issued, changes to the post retirement
healthcare information disclosed in this note may be required.
146 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
ALTERNATIVE ORE RESERVE ESTIMATES FOR US REPORTING
As
a consequence of the US Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) requirement
to use historical price data rather than assumptions of future commodity prices,
which are the basis of the JORC Code reported numbers on pages 17 to 21, the
reserves at certain operations have been amended for SEC reporting purposes only.
Material changes are shown below.
The ore reserve figures in the following tables are as of 31 December 2003. Metric units are used throughout. The figures used to calculate Rio Tinto's share of reserves are often more precise than the rounded numbers shown in the tables, hence small differences might result if the calculations are repeated using the tabulated figures.
Type of mine
(a) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved
ore reserves at end 2003 |
Probable
ore reserves at end 2003 |
SEC
ore reserves 2003 compared with JORC 2003 |
Average |
2003 Rio Tinto share | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Grade | SEC | JORC | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Recover- | Recover- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
SEC | JORC | SEC | JORC | % | able | able | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2003 | 2003 | 2003 | metal | metal | |||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | |||||||||||||||||||||
COPPER | of tonnes | %Cu | of tonnes | %Cu | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Cu | %Cu | of tonnes | of tonnes | ||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit | O/P | 22.8 | 0.62 | 422 | 0.57 | 445 | 557 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 89 | 100.0 | 2.253 | 2.542 | |||||||||||||
underground block cave | U/G | | 321 | | 0.70 | 91 | 100.0 | | 2.022 | |||||||||||||||||
underground skarn ores | U/G | | 13.5 | | 1.89 | 93 | 100.0 | | 0.236 | |||||||||||||||||
Escondida (Chile) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sulphide | O/P | 636 | 1.45 | 700 | 1.04 | 1,337 | 1,482 | 1.24 | 1.21 | 86 | 30.0 | 4.214 | 4.615 | |||||||||||||
low grade float | O/P | 103 | 0.63 | 227 | 0.63 | 330 | 565 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 81 | 30.0 | 0.501 | 0.827 | |||||||||||||
oxide | O/P | 130 | 0.76 | 34.5 | 0.60 | 164 | 185 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 88 | 30.0 | 0.314 | 0.334 | |||||||||||||
mixed | O/P | 31.0 | 1.36 | 31.0 | 50.0 | 1.36 | 1.04 | 39 | 30.0 | 0.049 | 0.061 | |||||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 7.331 | 10.637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto copper | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
operations | 20.209 | 23.514 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | grammes | millions | grammes | millions | millions | grammes | grammes | millions | millions | |||||||||||||||||
GOLD | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | of tonnes | per tonne | per tonne | of ounces | of ounces | ||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit | O/P | 22.8 | 0.40 | 422 | 0.37 | 445 | 557 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 66 | 100.0 | 3.494 | 3.834 | |||||||||||||
underground block cave | U/G | | 321 | | 0.27 | 68 | 100.0 | | 1.856 | |||||||||||||||||
underground skarn ores | U/G | | 13.5 | | 1.22 | 66 | 100.0 | | 0.351 | |||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) | U/G | 5.6 | 4.02 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 4.02 | 3.95 | 72 | 70.3 | 0.362 | 0.435 | |||||||||||||||
Morro do Ouro (Brazil) | O/P | 327 | 0.42 | 61.7 | 0.38 | 389 | 361 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 81 | 51.0 | 2.153 | 1.999 | |||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 6.009 | 8.475 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto gold | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
operations | 31.192 | 33.658 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | |||||||||||||||||||||
LEAD | of tonnes | %Pb | of tonnes | %Pb | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Pb | %Pb | of tonnes | of tonnes | ||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) | U/G | 5.6 | 4.11 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 4.11 | 4.02 | 76 | 70.3 | 0.123 | 0.146 | |||||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 0.123 | 0.146 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto lead | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
operations | 0.533 | 0.556 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | |||||||||||||||||||||
MOLYBDENUM | of tonnes | %Mo | of tonnes | %Mo | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Mo | %Mo | of tonnes | of tonnes | ||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit | O/P | 22.8 | 0.038 | 422 | 0.042 | 445 | 557 | 0.041 | 0.037 | 55 | 100.0 | 0.102 | 0.114 | |||||||||||||
underground block cave | U/G | | 321 | | 0.035 | 48 | 100.0 | | 0.054 | |||||||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 0.102 | 0.168 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
molybdenum operations | 0.102 | 0.168 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | grammes | millions | grammes | millions | millions | grammes | grammes | millions | millions | |||||||||||||||||
SILVER | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | of tonnes | per tonne | per tonne | of ounces | of ounces | ||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
open pit | O/P | 22.8 | 3.49 | 422 | 2.95 | 445 | 557 | 2.97 | 2.72 | 80 | 100.0 | 33.929 | 38.908 | |||||||||||||
underground block cave | U/G | | 321 | | 2.69 | 71 | 100.0 | | 19.682 | |||||||||||||||||
underground skarn ores | U/G | | 13.5 | | 13.4 | 71 | 100.0 | | 4.114 | |||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) | U/G | 5.6 | 530 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 530 | 483 | 75 | 70.3 | 50.152 | 55.556 | |||||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 84.081 | 118.260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto silver | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
operations | 184.705 | 218.884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | |||||||||||||||||||||
ZINC | of tonnes | %Zn | of tonnes | %Zn | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Zn | %Zn | of tonnes | of tonnes | ||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) | U/G | 5.6 | 10.6 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 87 | 70.3 | 0.364 | 0.444 | |||||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 0.364 | 0.444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto zinc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
operations | 1.230 | 1.310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Likely mining method: O/P = open pit; U/G = underground. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 147 |
Financial summary 1993 2003
US$m | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Consolidated turnover | 8,795 | 7,755 | 8,140 | 6,901 | 7,436 | 7,112 | 7,197 | 7,875 | 8,152 | 8,443 | 9,228 | |||||||||||
Share of equity accounted entities | 1,079 | 961 | 1,194 | 1,808 | 1,998 | 2,109 | 2,113 | 2,097 | 2,286 | 2,385 | 2,527 | |||||||||||
Gross turnover | 9,874 | 8,716 | 9,334 | 8,709 | 9,434 | 9,221 | 9,310 | 9,972 | 10,438 | 10,828 | 11,755 | |||||||||||
Adjusted PBIT (a) | 1,472 | 1,819 | 2,484 | 1,887 | 2,256 | 2,191 | 2,329 | 2,912 | 3,102 | 2,696 | 2,266 | |||||||||||
Exceptional items (b) | (340 | ) | 25 | (215 | ) | | | (443 | ) | | | (715 | ) | (1,094 | ) | 126 | ||||||
Finance charges | (113 | ) | (81 | ) | (59 | ) | (108 | ) | (184 | ) | (240 | ) | (298 | ) | (403 | ) | (404 | ) | (291 | ) | (298 | ) |
Profit before tax | 1,019 | 1,763 | 2,210 | 1,779 | 2,072 | 1,508 | 2,031 | 2,509 | 1,983 | 1,311 | 2,094 | |||||||||||
Adjusted profit before tax (a) | 1,359 | 1,738 | 2,425 | 1,779 | 2,072 | 1,951 | 2,031 | 2,509 | 2,698 | 2,405 | 1,968 | |||||||||||
Tax (excl. exceptional items) | (487 | ) | (496 | ) | (818 | ) | (566 | ) | (668 | ) | (664 | ) | (548 | ) | (819 | ) | (850 | ) | (750 | ) | (567 | ) |
Tax exceptional items (b) | 229 | 29 | 60 | | | 40 | | | 132 | 42 | | |||||||||||
Outside shareholders interests | ||||||||||||||||||||||
including exceptional items (b) | (81 | ) | (109 | ) | (189 | ) | (143 | ) | (184 | ) | (184 | ) | (201 | ) | (183 | ) | (186 | ) | 48 | (19 | ) | |
Profit attributable to Rio Tinto | 680 | 1,187 | 1,263 | 1,070 | 1,220 | 700 | 1,282 | 1,507 | 1,079 | 651 | 1,508 | |||||||||||
Adjusted earnings (a) | 791 | 1,133 | 1,418 | 1,070 | 1,220 | 1,103 | 1,282 | 1,507 | 1,662 | 1,530 | 1,382 | |||||||||||
Earnings per share (d) | 49.0 | c | 85.0 | c | 90.5 | c | 76.5 | c | 87.1 | c | 50.4 | c | 93.6 | c | 109.8 | c | 78.5 | c | 47.3 | c | 109.5 | c |
Adjusted earnings per share (a) | 57.0 | c | 81.3 | c | 101.6 | c | 76.5 | c | 87.1 | c | 79.4 | c | 93.6 | c | 109.8 | c | 120.9 | c | 111.2 | c | 100.3 | c |
Dividends per share | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto shareholders (US cents) | n/a | n/a | n/a | 51.00 | c | 52.00 | c | 52.00 | c | 55.00 | c | 57.50 | c | 59.00 | c | 60.00 | c | 64.00 | c | |||
Rio Tinto plc (pence) | 20.50 | p | 27.50 | p | 31.50 | p | 31.71 | p | 31.92 | p | 31.99 | p | 34.23 | p | 38.87 | p | 41.68 | p | 37.47 | p | 37.13 | p |
Rio Tinto Limited (Aus. cents) (d) | 65.12 | c | 55.81 | c | 60.47 | c | 65.05 | c | 75.94 | c | 83.52 | c | 87.11 | c | 102.44 | c | 115.27 | c | 105.93 | c | 89.70 | c |
Net assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed assets (excl. investments) | 7,223 | 8,551 | 8,560 | 9,682 | 9,334 | 9,589 | 9,861 | 13,242 | 12,589 | 13,255 | 16,450 | |||||||||||
Investments (l) | 1,236 | 1,332 | 1,687 | 2,109 | 2,442 | 2,183 | 1,840 | 1,802 | 2,290 | 2,881 | 2,968 | |||||||||||
Other assets less liabilities | 1,404 | 1,458 | 1,325 | 1,578 | 1,440 | 1,235 | 1,293 | 1,380 | 1,896 | 1,463 | 1,804 | |||||||||||
Provisions | (2,227 | ) | (2,593 | ) | (2,657 | ) | (2,795 | ) | (2,749 | ) | (2,790 | ) | (2,887 | ) | (3,299 | ) | (3,194 | ) | (3,612 | ) | (4,536 | ) |
Outside shareholders interests | (506 | ) | (653 | ) | (695 | ) | (770 | ) | (717 | ) | (673 | ) | (715 | ) | (864 | ) | (827 | ) | (778 | ) | (1,003 | ) |
Net debt | (1,339 | ) | (1,349 | ) | (1,483 | ) | (2,546 | ) | (2,839 | ) | (3,258 | ) | (2,429 | ) | (5,050 | ) | (5,711 | ) | (5,747 | ) | (5,646 | ) |
Rio Tinto shareholders funds | 5,791 | 6,746 | 6,737 | 7,258 | 6,911 | 6,286 | 6,963 | 7,211 | 7,043 | 7,462 | 10,037 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditure (e) | (693 | ) | (1,428 | ) | (1,345 | ) | (1,738 | ) | (1,638 | ) | (1,180 | ) | (771 | ) | (798 | ) | (1,405 | ) | (1,417 | ) | (1,608 | ) |
Acquisitions | (1,431 | ) | (228 | ) | (532 | ) | (119 | ) | (112 | ) | (492 | ) | (326 | ) | (3,332 | ) | (958 | ) | (106 | ) | | |
Disposals | 1,951 | 628 | 432 | 107 | 393 | 3 | 47 | 141 | 299 | 233 | 405 | |||||||||||
Total cash flow from operations (f) | 2,252 | 2,225 | 2,735 | 2,452 | 2,979 | 3,071 | 3,015 | 3,440 | 3,415 | 3,743 | 3,486 | |||||||||||
Cash flow before financing (g) | 1,118 | (23 | ) | (170 | ) | (784 | ) | (335 | ) | (37 | ) | 825 | (2,291 | ) | (590 | ) | 29 | 191 | ||||
Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating margin (h) | 15 | % | 21 | % | 27 | % | 22 | % | 24 | % | 24 | % | 25 | % | 29 | % | 30 | % | 25 | % | 19 | % |
Net debt to total capital (i) | 18 | % | 15 | % | 17 | % | 24 | % | 27 | % | 32 | % | 24 | % | 38 | % | 42 | % | 41 | % | 34 | % |
Adj. earnings: shareholders funds (j) | 14 | % | 18 | % | 21 | % | 15 | % | 17 | % | 17 | % | 19 | % | 21 | % | 23 | % | 21 | % | 16 | % |
Interest cover (k) | 17 | 26 | 30 | 17 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 11 | |||||||||||
(a) |
Adjusted earnings and Adjusted earnings per share exclude exceptional items of such magnitude that their exclusion is necessary in order that adjusted earnings fulfil their purpose of reflecting the underlying performance of the Group. In this statement, Adjusted profit before interest and tax (Adjusted PBIT) and Adjusted profit before tax exclude the pre-tax values of such exceptional items. Adjusted PBIT includes the Groups share of joint ventures and associates operating profit, excluding exceptional items. |
(b) |
These lines contain the exceptional items referred to in (a) above and related taxation. In addition, outside interests for 2002 include a credit for US$173 million relating to exceptional items. For 1998, 2001 and 2002 exceptional items include exceptional asset write downs of US$403 million, US$583 million and US$763 million respectively, net of tax and outside shareholders interests. In addition, 2002 includes US$116 million for an exceptional environmental remediation charge. For 2003 exceptional items include profits on sale of operations of $126 million. For 1993 to 1995, the exceptional items comprise amounts that are required to be excluded from operating profit under FRS 3. |
(c) |
Changes in accounting policy: Reported figures for 1993 1998 have been restated following the change in accounting policy on implementation of FRS 12 in 1999. Shareholders funds for 2001 and prior years have been restated following the implementation of FRS 19 in 2002. |
(d) |
Earnings per share and Rio Tinto Limited dividends per share have been adjusted for the years 1993 1995 in respect of the 7.5 per cent bonus issue on 15 January 1996 which applied to Rio Tinto Limited shares. |
(e) |
Capital expenditure comprises purchases of property, plant and equipment plus direct funding provided to joint ventures and associates for Rio Tintos share of their capital expenditure, less disposals of property, plant and equipment. The figures include 100 per cent of subsidiaries capital expenditure, but exclude that of joint ventures and associates except where directly funded by Rio Tinto. |
(f) |
Total cash flow from operations comprises Cash flow from operating activities together with Dividends from joint ventures and associates. |
(g) | Cash flow before financing represents the net cash flow before management of liquid resources and financing. |
(h) | Operating margin is the percentage of Adjusted PBIT to Gross turnover. |
(i) |
Total capital comprises year end shareholders funds plus net debt and outside shareholders interests. |
(j) | This represents Adjusted earnings expressed as a percentage of the mean of opening and closing shareholders funds. |
(k) |
Interest cover represents the number of times by which subsidiary interest (excluding the amortisation of discount but including capitalised interest) is covered by Group operating profit (excluding exceptional items) less amortisation of discount plus dividends from joint ventures and associates. |
(l) | Treasury bonds acquired in 2002 as security for the deferred consideration payable in respect of the North Jacobs Ranch acquisition have been excluded from net debt and included in investments (2003: $228 million; 2002: US$304 million). |
148 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Rio Tinto share ownership As at 6 February 2004
RIO TINTO PLC | Number
of
shares
|
Percentage
of
issued
share
capital
|
||||
1 | BNY (Nominees) Limited | 83,265,180 | 7.80 | |||
2 | Chase Nominees Limited | 54,818,722 | 5.13 | |||
3 | HSBC Global Custody Nominee (UK) Limited | |||||
<357206> | 26,506,301 | 2.48 | ||||
4 | P rudential Client HSBC GIS Nominee (UK) | |||||
Limited <PAC> | 21,817,047 | 2.04 | ||||
5 | Nortrust Nominees Limited <SLEND> | 29,563,363 | 1.92 | |||
6 | The Bank of New York (Nominees) Limited | 20,001,650 | 1.87 | |||
7 | State Street Nominees Limited <OM01> | 19,257,002 | 1.80 | |||
8 | Chase Nominees Limited <LEND> | 17,990,974 | 1.68 | |||
9 | BNY (OCS) Nominees Limited | 15,096,818 | 1.41 | |||
10 | Chase Nominees Limited <BGILIFEL> | 13,839,987 | 1.29 | |||
11 | Nortust Nominees Limited | 13,226,673 | 1.23 | |||
12 | BBHISL Nominees Limited <122562> | 13,000,365 | 1.21 | |||
13 | Vidacos Nominees Limited <FGN> | 11,901,126 | 1.11 | |||
14 | Mellon Nominees (UK) Limited <BSDTABN> | 11,373,938 | 1.06 | |||
15 | Nutraco Nominees Limited | 11,004,862 | 1.03 | |||
16 | Chase Nominees Limited <USRESLD> | 10,972,066 | 1.02 | |||
17 | Stanlife Nominees Limited <STNLIFLD> | 10,728,652 | 1.00 | |||
18 | Mellon Nominees (UK) Limited <BSDTUSD> | 10,587,803 | 0.99 | |||
19 | Chase Nominees Limited <LENDNON> | 10,101,328 | 0.94 | |||
20 | HSBC Global Custody Nominee (UK) Limited | |||||
<899877> | 9,953,391 | 0.93 | ||||
415,007,248 | 38.89 | |||||
RIO TINTO LIMITED | Number
of
shares
|
Percentage
of
issued
share
capital
|
||||
1 | Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited | 187,439,520 | 37.56 | |||
2 | JP Morgan Nominees Australia Limited | 57,318,055 | 11.49 | |||
3 | Westpac Custodian Nominees Limited | 46,285,925 | 9.27 | |||
4 | National Nominees Limited | 43,912,622 | 8.80 | |||
5 | Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited | 10,521,110 | 2.11 | |||
6 | Anz Nominees Limited | 8,865,088 | 1.78 | |||
7 | HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited | 7,137,052 | 1.43 | |||
8 | Queensland Investment Corporation | 6,620,543 | 1.33 | |||
9 | AMP Life Limited | 5,416,783 | 1.09 | |||
10 | Cogent Nominees Pty Limited | 4,347,544 | 0.87 | |||
11 | RBC Global Services Australia Nominees Pty Limited | 4,069,687 | 0.82 | |||
12 | RBC Global Services Australia | 2,710,975 | 0.54 | |||
13 | Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited | 2,626,730 | 0.53 | |||
14 | NRMA Nominees Pty Limited | 2,263,174 | 0.45 | |||
15 | Westpac Financial Services Limited | 1,976,866 | 0.40 | |||
16 | Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited | |||||
<CFS WSLE GEARED SHR FND A/C> | 1,626,538 | 0.33 | ||||
17 | Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited | |||||
CFT IMPUTATION FUND A/C> | 1,512,729 | 0.30 | ||||
18 | Government Superannuation Office | |||||
(A/C State Super Fund) | 1,498,492 | 0.30 | ||||
19 | Cogent Nominees Pty Limited | 1,468,371 | 0.29 | |||
20 | Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited | 1,460,818 | 0.29 | |||
399,078,622 | 79.96 | |||||
Analysis of ordinary shareholders As at 6 February 2004
Rio Tinto plc | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||||||||||||
No of | % | Shares | % | No of | % | Shares | % | |||||||||
accounts | accounts | |||||||||||||||
1 to 1,000 shares | 44,038 | 65.82 | 19,269,104 | 1.81 | 49,677 | 75.71 | 19,912,429 | 3.99 | ||||||||
1,001 to 5,000 shares | 18,982 | 28.37 | 38,653,410 | 3.62 | 13,844 | 21.10 | 27,256,302 | 5.46 | ||||||||
5,001 to 10,000 shares | 1,689 | 2.52 | 11,663,939 | 1.09 | 1,275 | 1.94 | 8,866,405 | 1.78 | ||||||||
10,001 to 25,000 shares | 861 | 1.29 | 13,496,406 | 1.26 | 543 | 0.83 | 8,008,168 | 1.60 | ||||||||
25,001 to 125,000 shares | 708 | 1.06 | 40,445,924 | 3.79 | 178 | 0.27 | 8,967,650 | 1.80 | ||||||||
125,001 to 250,000 shares | 213 | 0.32 | 38,435,214 | 3.60 | 37 | 0.06 | 6,559,141 | 1.31 | ||||||||
250,001 to 1,250,000 shares | 274 | 0.41 | 149,640,877 | 14.02 | 37 | 0.06 | 19,469,996 | 3.90 | ||||||||
1,250,001 to 2,500,000 | 74 | 0.11 | 130,178,420 | 12.20 | 7 | 0.01 | 11,806,988 | 2.37 | ||||||||
2,500,001 and over | 67 | 0.10 | 542,315,803 | 50.81 | 13 | 0.02 | 387,273,633 | 77.60 | ||||||||
ADRs | 83,265,180 | 7.80 | 939,100 | 0.19 | ||||||||||||
66,906 | 100 | 1,067,364,277 | 100 | 65,611 | 100 | 499,059,812 | 100 | |||||||||
Number of holdings less than marketable parcel of A$500 | 1,642 |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 149 |
Definitions
NON MINING DEFINITIONS
Throughout this document, the collective expressions Rio Tinto, Rio Tinto Group and Group are used for convenience only. Depending on the context in which they are used, they mean Rio Tinto plc and/or Rio Tinto Limited and/or one or more of the individual companies in which Rio Tinto plc and/or Rio Tinto Limited directly or indirectly own investments, all of which are separate and distinct legal entities.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the following terms have the meanings shown below:
ADR | American Depositary Receipt evidencing American Depositary Shares (ADS). | |
Australian dollars | Australian currency. Abbreviates to A$. | |
Australian GAAP | Generally accepted accounting principles in Australia. | |
Billion | One thousand million. | |
Canadian dollars | Canadian currency. Abbreviates to C$. | |
Company/Companies | Means, as the context so requires, Rio Tinto plc and/or Rio Tinto Limited. | |
DLC merger | Refers to the dual listed companies merger (1995). | |
LIBOR | London InterBank Offered Rate. | |
LME | London Metal Exchange. | |
New Zealand dollars | New Zealand currency. Abbreviates to NZ$ | |
Pounds sterling | UK currency. Abbreviates to £, pence or p. | |
Public shareholders | The holders of Rio Tinto plc shares that are not companies in the Rio Tinto Limited Group and the holders of Rio Tinto Limited shares that are not companies in the Rio Tinto plc Group. | |
Rand | South African currency. Abbreviates to R. | |
Rio Tinto Limited | Refers to Rio Tinto Limited, and, where the context permits, its subsidiaries and associated companies. | |
Rio Tinto Limited ADS | An American Depositary Share representing the right to receive four Rio Tinto Limited shares. | |
Rio Tinto Limited group | Rio Tinto Limited and its subsidiaries and associated companies. | |
Rio Tinto Limited shareholders | The holders of Rio Tinto Limited shares. | |
Rio Tinto Limited Shareholder Voting Agreement |
The agreement, dated 21 December 1995, between Rio Tinto plc, Rio Tinto Limited, RTL Shareholder SVC Limited and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to the voting rights of the RioTinto plc Special Voting Share at meetings of shareholders of Rio Tinto plc. | |
Rio
Tinto Limited/RTL Special Voting Share |
The Special Voting Share in Rio Tinto Limited. | |
Rio Tinto plc | Rio Tinto plc and its subsidiaries and associated companies. | |
Rio Tinto plc ADS | An American Depositary Share representing the right to receive four Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares. | |
Rio Tinto plc group | Rio Tinto plc and its subsidiaries and associated companies. | |
Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares | The ordinary shares of 10p each in Rio Tinto plc. | |
Rio Tinto plc shareholders | The holders of Rio Tinto plc shares. | |
Rio Tinto Shareholder Voting Agreement |
The agreement, dated 21 December 1995, between Rio Tinto plc, Rio Tinto Australian Holdings Limited, RTP Shareholder SVC Pty Limited, Rio Tinto Limited and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to the voting rights of the Rio Tinto Limited shares held by the Rio Tinto plc group and the Rio Tinto Limited Special Voting Share at meetings of Rio Tinto Limited shareholders. | |
Rio Tinto plc shares | Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares. |
150 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Rio Tinto plc/ RTP Special Voting |
The Special Voting Share of 10p in Rio Tinto plc. | |
Share/shares | Rio Tinto Limited shares or Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares, as the context requires. | |
Sharing Agreement | The agreement, dated 21 December 1995, as amended between Rio Tinto Limited and Rio Tinto plc relating to the regulation of the relationship between Rio Tinto Limited and Rio Tinto plc following the DLC merger. | |
UK GAAP | Generally accepted accounting principles in the UK. | |
US dollars | United States currency. Abbreviates to dollars, $ or US$ and US cents to USc. | |
US GAAP | Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. | |
MINING AND TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS | ||
Alumina | Aluminium oxide. It is extracted from bauxite in a chemical refining process and is subsequently the principal raw material in the electro-chemical process by which aluminium is produced. | |
Anode and cathode copper | At the final stage of the smelting of copper concentrates, the copper is cast into specially shaped slabs called anodes for subsequent refining to produce refined cathode copper. | |
Bauxite | Mainly hydrated aluminium oxides (AL2O3.2H2O). Principal ore of alumina, the raw material from which aluminium is made. | |
Beneficiated bauxite | Bauxite ore that has been treated to remove waste material to improve its physical or chemical characteristics. | |
Bioleaching | The deliberate use of bacteria to speed the chemical release of metals from ores. | |
Block caving | An underground bulk mining method. It involves undercutting the orebody to induce ore fracture and collapse by gravity. The broken ore is recovered through draw points below. | |
Borates | A generic term for mineral compounds which contain boron and oxygen. | |
Cathode copper | Refined copper produced by electrolytic refining of impure copper or by electrowinning. | |
Classification | Separating crushed and ground ore into portions of different size particles. | |
Concentrate | The product of a physical concentration process, such as flotation or gravity concentration, which involves separating ore minerals from unwanted waste rock. Concentrates require subsequent processing (such as smelting or leaching) to break down or dissolve the ore minerals and obtain the desired elements, usually metals. | |
Cutoff grade | The lowest grade of mineralised material considered economic to process. It is used in the calculation of the quantity of ore present in a given deposit. | |
Doré | A precious metal alloy which is produced by smelting. Doré is an intermediate product which is subsequently refined to produce pure gold and silver. | |
DWT | Dead weight tons is the combined weight in long tons (2,240 pounds weight) of cargo, fuel and fresh water that a ship can carry. | |
Flotation | A method of separating finely ground minerals using a froth created in water by specific reagents. In the flotation process certain mineral particles are induced to float by becoming attached to bubbles of froth whereas others, usually unwanted, sink. | |
FOB | Free on board. | |
Grade | The proportion of metal or mineral present in ore, or any other host material, expressed in this document as per cent, grams per tonne or ounces per ton. | |
Head grade | The average grade of ore delivered to the mill. | |
Ilmenite | Mineral composed of iron, titanium and oxygen. | |
Metallurgical coal | Also referred to as coking coal. By virtue of its carbonisation properties, it is used in the manufacture of coke, which is used in the steel making process. |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 151 |
Definitions continued | ||
Mineral resource | Material of intrinsic economic interest occurring in such form and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. | |
Ore | A rock from which a metal(s) or mineral(s) can be economically extracted. | |
Ore milled | The quantity of ore processed. | |
Ore hoisted | The quantity of ore which is removed from an underground mine for processing. | |
Ore reserve | That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. | |
Pressure oxidation | A method of treating sulphide ores. In the case of refractory gold ores, the object is to oxidise the sulphides to sulphates and hence liberate the gold for subsequent cyanide leaching. The technique involves reaction of the ore with sulphuric acid under pressure in the presence of oxygen gas. | |
Probable ore reserves | Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proved reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proved reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. | |
Proved ore reserves | Reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well established. | |
Rock mined | The quantity of ore and waste rock excavated from the mine. In this document, the term is only applied to surface mining operations. | |
Rutile | A mineral composed of titanium and oxygen (TiO2). | |
Steam coal | Also referred to as steaming coal, thermal coal or energy coal. It is used as a fuel source in electrical power generation, cement manufacture and various industrial applications. | |
Stripping ratio | The tonnes of waste material which must be removed to allow the mining of one tonne of ore. | |
Solvent extraction and electrowinning (SX-EW) |
Processes for extracting metal from an ore and producing pure metal. First the metal is leached into solution; the resulting solution is then purified in the solvent extraction process; the solution is then treated in an electro-chemical process (electrowinning) to recover cathode copper. | |
Tailing | The rock wastes which are rejected from a concentrating process after the recoverable valuable minerals have been extracted. | |
Titanium dioxide feedstock | A feedstock rich in titanium dioxide, produced, in Rio Tintos case, by smelting ores containing titanium minerals. | |
Zircon | Zirconium mineral (ZrSiO4). | |
Notes | • | Ore reserve estimates in this document have been adjusted for mining losses and dilution during extraction. |
• | Metal grades have not been adjusted for mill recoveries, but mill recoveries are presented in the table of reserves and are taken into consideration in the calculation of Rio Tintos share of recoverable metal. | |
• | Unless stated to the contrary, reserves of industrial minerals and coal are stated in terms of recoverable quantities of saleable material, after processing or beneficiation losses. | |
• | Reserve and resource terminology used in this document complies in general with the requirements of the Australian Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange. |
152 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Conversion of weights | 1 troy ounce = 31.1 grams |
and measures | 1 kilogram = 32.15 troy ounces |
1 kilogram = 2.2046 pounds | |
1 metric tonne = 1,000 kilograms | |
1 metric tonne = 2,204.6 pounds | |
1 metric tonne = 1.1023 short tons | |
1 short ton = 2,000 pounds | |
1 long ton = 2,240 pounds | |
1 gram per metric tonne = 0.02917 troy ounces per short ton | |
1 gram per metric tonne = 0.03215 troy ounces per metric tonne | |
1 kilometre = 0.6214 miles |
Exchange
rates
The
following tables show, for the periods and dates indicated, certain information
regarding the exchange rates for the pound sterling and Australian dollar, based
on the Noon Buying Rates for pounds sterling and Australian dollars expressed
in US dollars per £1.00 and per A$1.00.
Pounds sterling | Australian dollars | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended 31 December* | Period | Average | High | Low | Year ended 31 December* | Period | Average | High | Low | |||||||||
end | rate | end | rate | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
2004 (through 6 February) | 1.84 | 1.82 | 1.85 | 1.78 | 2004 (through 6 February) | 0.769 | 0.769 | 0.780 | 0.751 | |||||||||
2003 | 1.78 | 1.63 | 1.79 | 1.55 | 2003 | 0.749 | 0.648 | 0.752 | 0.562 | |||||||||
2002 | 1.61 | 1.50 | 1.61 | 1.41 | 2002 | 0.563 | 0.544 | 0.575 | 0.506 | |||||||||
2001 | 1.45 | 1.44 | 1.50 | 1.37 | 2001 | 0.512 | 0.517 | 0.571 | 0.483 | |||||||||
2000 | 1.49 | 1.52 | 1.65 | 1.40 | 2000 | 0.556 | 0.579 | 0.672 | 0.511 | |||||||||
1999 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.55 | 1999 | 0.656 | 0.645 | 0.668 | 0.610 | |||||||||
1998 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.72 | 1.61 | 1998 | 0.612 | 0.629 | 0.687 | 0.555 | |||||||||
1997 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.70 | 1.58 | 1997 | 0.652 | 0.744 | 0.798 | 0.649 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
*
The Noon Buying Rate on such dates differed slightly from the rates used in
the preparation of Rio Tintos consolidated financial statements as of
such date.
No representation is made that pound sterling and Australian dollar amounts
have been, could have been or could be converted into dollars at the Noon Buying
Rate on such dates or at any other dates.
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 153 |
Financial calendar
2 February 2004 | Announcement of results for 2003 |
10 March 2004 | Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares and ADRs quoted ex-dividend for 2003 final dividend |
12 March 2004 | Record date for 2003 final dividend for Rio Tinto plc shares and ADRs |
16 March 2004 | Record date for 2003 final dividend for Rio Tinto Limited shares and ADRs |
16 March 2004 | Plan notice date for election under the dividend reinvestment plan for the 2003 final dividend |
6 April 2004 | Payment date for 2003 final dividend |
7 April 2004 | Payment date for 2003 final dividend for holders of ADRs |
7 April 2004 | Annual general meeting Rio Tinto plc |
22 April 2004 | Annual general meeting Rio Tinto Limited |
29 July 2004 | Announcement of half year results for 2004 |
11 August 2004 | Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares and ADRs quoted ex-dividend for 2004 interim dividend |
13 August 2004 | Record date for 2004 interim dividend for Rio Tinto plc shares and ADRs |
17 August 2004 | Record date for 2004 interim dividend for Rio Tinto Limited shares and ADRs |
19 August 2004 | Plan notice date for election under the dividend reinvestment plan for the 2004 interim dividend |
10 September 2004 | Payment date for 2004 interim dividend |
13 September 2004 | Payment date for 2004 interim dividend for holders of ADRs |
February 2005 | Announcement of results for 2004 |
Publications
The
following publications may be obtained from Rio Tinto:
2003
Annual report and financial statements
2003 Annual review
2003 Social and environment review highlights
The
way we work Rio Tintos statement of business practice
Review magazine Rio Tintos quarterly magazine for shareholders
The 2003 Databook and the 2003 Social and environment review are available on the Rio Tinto website.
Copies
of the 2003 annual reports for the following listed Rio Tinto Group companies
are also available on request:
Bougainville
Copper Limited
Coal & Allied Industries Limited
Energy
Resources of Australia Limited
Palabora Mining Company Limited
Rio Tinto Zimbabwe Limited
Rio
Tinto on the web
Information
about Rio Tinto is available on our website www.riotinto.com
Many
of Rio Tintos publications may be downloaded in their entirety from this
site and access gained to Group company and other websites.
General
enquiries
If
you require general information about the Group please contact the External
Affairs department. For all other enquiries please contact the relevant company
secretary or Computershare.
154 | Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements |
Useful addresses
Shareholders | Low cost share dealing service & |
Please contact the respective registrar if you | Individual Savings Account (ISA) |
have any queries about your shareholding. | (for Rio Tinto plc shareholders only) |
Rio Tinto plc | Stocktrade |
Computershare Investor Services PLC | P O Box 1076 |
P O Box 82 | 10 George Street |
The Pavilions | Edinburgh EH2 2PZ |
Bridgwater Road | |
Bristol BS99 7NH | Low cost share dealing service |
Telephone: +44 (0) 131 240 0101 | |
Telephone: +44 (0) 870 702 0000 | UK residents only: 0845 840 1532 |
Facsimile: +44 (0) 870 703 6119 | Website: www.stocktrade.co.uk |
UK residents only, | |
Freephone: 0800 435021 | Individual Savings Account (ISA) |
Website: www.computershare.com | Telephone: +44 (0) 131 240 0623 |
Website: www.stocktrade.co.uk | |
Rio Tinto Limited | |
Computershare Investor Services Pty. Limited | Registered offices |
GPO Box 2975 | Rio Tinto plc |
Melbourne | 6 St Jamess Square |
Victoria 3000 | London SW1Y 4LD |
Registered in England | |
Until 19 March 2004 | No. 719885 |
Telephone: +61 (0) 3 9615 5970 | |
Facsimile: +61 (0) 3 9611 5710 | Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7930 2399 |
Facsimile: +44 (0) 20 7930 3249 | |
After 19 March 2004 | Website: www.riotinto.com |
Telephone: +61 (0) 3 9415 4030 | |
Facsimile: +61 (0) 3 9473 2500 | Rio Tinto Limited |
Level 33 | |
The toll free number for Australian residents | 55 Collins Street |
remains the same, | Melbourne, Victoria 3000 |
Toll free 1 800 813 292 | ACN: 004 458 404 |
Website: www.computershare.com | |
Telephone: +61 (0) 3 9283 3333 | |
Holders of American Depositary | Facsimile: +61 (0) 3 9283 3707 |
Receipts (ADRs) | Website: www.riotinto.com |
Please contact the ADR administrator if you | |
have any queries about your ADRs | |
ADR administrator | |
The Bank of New York | |
Depositary Receipts Division | |
620 Avenue of the Americas | |
6th Floor | |
New York, NY 10011 | |
Telephone: +1 888 269 2377 | |
Website: www.bankofny.com | |
US investor relations consultant | |
Makinson Cowell (US) Limited | |
One Penn Plaza | |
250 West 34th Street | |
Suite 1935 | |
New York, NY 10119 | |
Telephone: +1 212 994 9044 | |
Website: www.mackinson.cowell.com |
Rio Tinto 2003 Annual report and financial statements | 155 |
Cover
photography by Tony Waller.
Designed by Tor Pettersen & Partners.
Printed in England by St Ives Westerham Press to ISO 14001 environmental standards.
The paper is manufactured to ISO 14001 environmental standards using fibres from
sustainable sources and pulps which are totally chlorine free.
Printed
in
Australia by PMP Print.
© Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited.
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the members of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
We have audited the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group ("the Group") and of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group (see "Accounting Presentation" on page A-7) set out on pages A-2 to A-75, which are expressed in US dollars. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Group's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. As detailed in the statement of accounting policies, the Group changed its accounting policy for deferred tax in 2002 following the adoption of Financial Reporting Standard 19 'Deferred Tax' under generally accepted accounting principles in the United Kingdom.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Auditing Standards generally accepted in the United Kingdom and Auditing Standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion the financial statements set out on pages A-2 to A-75 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Rio Tinto Group and of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group at 31 December 2003 and 2002 and their results of operations and cash flows of each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom vary in certain significant respects from those generally accepted in the United States of America. The application of the latter would have affected the determination of consolidated net income for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2003 and the determination of consolidated shareholders' funds at 31 December 2003, 2002 and 2001 to the extent summarised in Note 42 to the consolidated financial statements.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | PricewaterhouseCoopers |
Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors | Chartered Accountants |
London, England | Perth, Australia |
20 February 2004 | 20 February 2004 |
In respect of the members of Rio Tinto plc | In respect of the members of Rio Tinto Limited |
A-1
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Note | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||||||
Gross turnover (including share of joint | ||||||||||||||||||||
ventures and associates) | 7,809 | 7,213 | 6,934 | 5,956 | 5,458 | 5,296 | 11,755 | 10,828 | 10,438 | |||||||||||
Share of joint ventures' turnover | (1,128 | ) | (859 | ) | (855 | ) | (692 | ) | (803 | ) | (757 | ) | (1,820 | ) | (1,662 | ) | (1,612 | ) | ||
Share of associates' turnover | (2,649 | ) | (2,425 | ) | (2,356 | ) | (68 | ) | (141 | ) | (110 | ) | (707 | ) | (723 | ) | (674 | ) | ||
Consolidated turnover | 4,032 | 3,929 | 3,723 | 5,196 | 4,514 | 4,429 | 9,228 | 8,443 | 8,152 | |||||||||||
2 | Net operating costs | (3,664 | ) | (3,948 | ) | (3,586 | ) | (4,068 | ) | (3,659 | ) | (3,004 | ) | (7,732 | ) | (7,612 | ) | (6,590 | ) | |
Group operating profit | 368 | (19 | ) | 137 | 1,128 | 855 | 1,425 | 1,496 | 831 | 1,562 | ||||||||||
Share of operating profit of : | ||||||||||||||||||||
Joint ventures | 419 | 258 | 268 | 117 | 274 | 286 | 536 | 532 | 554 | |||||||||||
Associates | 678 | 671 | 794 | 20 | 51 | 34 | 234 | 239 | 217 | |||||||||||
Profit on disposal of interests in subsidiary, joint | ||||||||||||||||||||
ventures and associate | 47 | - | 54 | 126 | - | - | 126 | - | 54 | |||||||||||
Profit on ordinary activities before interest | 1,512 | 910 | 1,253 | 1,391 | 1,180 | 1,745 | 2,392 | 1,602 | 2,387 | |||||||||||
5 | Net interest payable | (138 | ) | (156 | ) | (225 | ) | (100 | ) | (124 | ) | (190 | ) | (206 | ) | (237 | ) | (347 | ) | |
6 | Amortisation of discount | (69 | ) | (39 | ) | (45 | ) | (36 | ) | (23 | ) | (19 | ) | (92 | ) | (54 | ) | (57 | ) | |
Profit on ordinary activities before taxation | 1,305 | 715 | 983 | 1,255 | 1,033 | 1,536 | 2,094 | 1,311 | 1,983 | |||||||||||
7 | Taxation | (341 | ) | (442 | ) | (378 | ) | (360 | ) | (423 | ) | (522 | ) | (567 | ) | (708 | ) | (718 | ) | |
Profit on ordinary activities after taxation | 964 | 273 | 605 | 895 | 610 | 1,014 | 1,527 | 603 | 1,265 | |||||||||||
Attributable to outside shareholders | (8 | ) | (78 | ) | (114 | ) | (11 | ) | 126 | (72 | ) | (19 | ) | 48 | (186 | ) | ||||
Profit for the financial year (net earnings) | 956 | 195 | 491 | 884 | 736 | 942 | 1,508 | 651 | 1,079 | |||||||||||
4 | Exceptional items | |||||||||||||||||||
Profit on disposal of interests in subsidiary, joint venture and associate | 47 | - | - | 126 | - | - | 126 | - | - | |||||||||||
Asset write downs | - | (639 | ) | (671 | ) | - | (433 | ) | (71 | ) | - | (978 | ) | (715 | ) | |||||
Environmental remediation charge | - | (116 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (116 | ) | - | |||||||||
Taxation | - | 9 | 120 | - | 42 | 19 | - | 42 | 132 | |||||||||||
Attributable to outside equity shareholders | - | 7 | - | - | 166 | - | - | 173 | - | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
47 | (739 | ) | (551 | ) | 126 | (225 | ) | (52 | ) | 126 | (879 | ) | (583 | ) | ||||||
Adjusted Earnings | 909 | 934 | 1,042 | 758 | 961 | 994 | 1,382 | 1,530 | 1,662 | |||||||||||
8 | Dividends to shareholders | (683 | ) | (639 | ) | (628 | ) | (320 | ) | (299 | ) | (294 | ) | (882 | ) | (826 | ) | (812 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Retained profit/(loss) for the financial year | 273 | (444 | ) | (137 | ) | 564 | 437 | 648 | 626 | (175 | ) | 267 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
9 | Earnings per ordinary share (US cents) | 89.7c | 18.3c | 46.1 | c | 177.2c | 147.6c | 189.0 | c | 109.5 | c | 47.3 | c | 78.5 | c | |||||
9 | Adjusted earnings per ordinary share (US cents) | 85.3c | 87.7c | 97.9 | c | 151.9c | 192.7c | 199.4 | c | 100.3 | c | 111.2 | c | 120.9 | c | |||||
Dividends per share | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Rio Tinto plc (pence) | 37.13 | p | 37.47 | p | 41.68 | p | 37.13 | p | 37.47 | p | 41.68 | p | |||||||
8 | Rio Tinto Limited (Australian cents) | 89.70 | c | 105.93 | c | 115.27 | c | 89.70 | c | 105.93 | c | 115.27 | c | |||||||
(a) | Diluted earnings per share figures for the Rio Tinto Group are 0.2 US cents (2002: 0.1 US cents, 2001: 0.2 US cents) lower than the earnings per share figures above. |
(b) | The results for all years relate wholly to continuing operations. |
(c) | The profit for each year is stated after the exceptional items set out in the box above. 'Adjusted earnings' excludes these items. See note 4 for further details. |
The separate financial statements for Rio Tinto plc and 100 per cent of Rio Tinto Limited shown above are prepared on the basis of the legal ownership of the various operations within each part of the Group. The distinction between the legal and economic interests represented by Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shareholdings is explained on page A-7. The amounts attributable to the economic interests of Rio Tinto plc shareholders and shareholders of Rio Tinto Limited other than Rio Tinto plc are as follows:
Rio Tinto plc | Rio Tinto Limited shareholders | |||||||||||||||||
shareholders | other than Rio Tinto plc | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
Economic interests in profit for the financial year | 1,167 | 504 | 835 | 341 | 147 | 244 | 1,508 | 651 | 1,079 | |||||||||
Average percentage of Rio Tinto Limited held by | ||||||||||||||||||
shareholders other than Rio Tinto plc | 62.4 | % | 62.4 | % | 62.4 | % |
The notes on pages A-7 to A-75
form part of these accounts. Material variations from accounting principles
generally
accepted in the United States are set out on pages A-59 to A-75.
A-2
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER (US GAAP format)
Note | Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||||
Revenues | 4,032 | 3,929 | 3,723 | 5,196 | 4,514 | 4,429 | 9,228 | 8,443 | 8,152 | |||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses applicable
to revenues (exclusive of
depreciation and amortisation shown separately below) |
(2,400 | ) | (2,162 | ) | (1,961 | ) | (2,750 | ) | (2,175 | ) | (2,019 | ) | (5,150 | ) | (4,337 | ) | (3,980 | ) | ||
Depreciation of fixed assets and amortisation of goodwill | (385 | ) | (423 | ) | (453 | ) | (621 | ) | (531 | ) | (476 | ) | (1,006 | ) | (954 | ) | (929 | ) | ||
Fixed asset write downs | - | (529 | ) | (644 | ) | - | (433 | ) | (71 | ) | - | (962 | ) | (715 | ) | |||||
Environmental remediation costs | - | (116 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (116 | ) | - | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (460 | ) | (380 | ) | (305 | ) | (357 | ) | (276 | ) | (212 | ) | (817 | ) | (656 | ) | (517 | ) | ||
Royalties | (220 | ) | (204 | ) | (183 | ) | (219 | ) | (186 | ) | (174 | ) | (439 | ) | (390 | ) | (357 | ) | ||
Exploration, research & development | (107 | ) | (111 | ) | (115 | ) | (43 | ) | (44 | ) | (54 | ) | (150 | ) | (155 | ) | (169 | ) | ||
Bad and doubtful debts | (28 | ) | (2 | ) | - | (3 | ) | (13 | ) | 7 | (31 | ) | (15 | ) | 7 | |||||
Foreign currency exchange gain/(loss) | (40 | ) | (28 | ) | 62 | (83 | ) | (13 | ) | (4 | ) | (123 | ) | (41 | ) | 58 | ||||
Other operating income/(expense) | (24 | ) | 7 | 13 | 8 | 12 | (1 | ) | (16 | ) | 14 | 12 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
(3,664 | ) | (3,948 | ) | (3,586 | ) | (4,068 | ) | (3,659 | ) | (3,004 | ) | (7,732 | ) | (7,612 | ) | (6,590 | ) | |||
Non operating income/(expenses) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of fixed asset investments | - | - | 54 | 126 | - | - | 126 | - | 54 | |||||||||||
Interest expense & amortisation of discount on | ||||||||||||||||||||
provisions | (97 | ) | (82 | ) | (122 | ) | (131 | ) | (131 | ) | (189 | ) | (228 | ) | (213 | ) | (311 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Income before income tax, minority | ||||||||||||||||||||
interest and equity income | 271 | (101 | ) | 69 | 1,123 | 724 | 1,236 | 1,394 | 618 | 1,305 | ||||||||||
Income Tax Expense | (7 | ) | (142 | ) | (49 | ) | (318 | ) | (341 | ) | (424 | ) | (325 | ) | (483 | ) | (473 | ) | ||
Minority interest in income of consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
subsidiaries | (8 | ) | (78 | ) | (114 | ) | (11 | ) | 126 | (72 | ) | (19 | ) | 48 | (186 | ) | ||||
Equity income of unconsolidated joint | ||||||||||||||||||||
ventures and affiliates | 700 | 516 | 585 | 90 | 227 | 202 | 458 | 468 | 433 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net income | 956 | 195 | 491 | 884 | 736 | 942 | 1,508 | 651 | 1,079 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Earnings per ordinary share (US cents) | 89.7c | 18.3c | 46.1 | c | 177.2c | 147.6c | 189.0 | c | 109.5 | c | 47.3 | c | 78.5 | c |
(a) | Diluted earnings per ordinary share figures for the Rio Tinto Group are 0.2 US cents (2002: 0.1 US cents, 2001: 0.2 US cents) lower than the earnings per share figures above. |
(b) | These Condensed Income Statements are in the format prescribed by the SEC as referred to in note 4 on page A-13. |
The notes on pages A-7 to A-75
form part of these accounts. Material variations from accounting principles
generally
accepted in the United States are set out on pages A-59 to A-75.
A-2(a)
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
CASH FLOW STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER
Note | Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities (see below) | 975 | 1,380 | 1,034 | 1,913 | 1,754 | 1,733 | 2,888 | 3,134 | 2,767 | |||||||||||
Dividends from joint ventures | 338 | 228 | 288 | 132 | 285 | 255 | 470 | 513 | 543 | |||||||||||
Dividends from associates | 397 | 368 | 210 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 128 | 96 | 105 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total cash flow from operations | 1,710 | 1,976 | 1,532 | 2,053 | 2,043 | 1,992 | 3,486 | 3,743 | 3,415 | |||||||||||
Interest received | 48 | 46 | 51 | 13 | 52 | 13 | 30 | 80 | 64 | |||||||||||
Interest paid | (121 | ) | (109 | ) | (140 | ) | (141 | ) | (173 | ) | (195 | ) | (231 | ) | (264 | ) | (335 | ) | ||
Dividends paid to outside shareholders | (47 | ) | (78 | ) | (66 | ) | (29 | ) | (39 | ) | (13 | ) | (76 | ) | (117 | ) | (79 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Returns on investment and servicing of finance | (120 | ) | (141 | ) | (155 | ) | (157 | ) | (160 | ) | (195 | ) | (277 | ) | (301 | ) | (350 | ) | ||
Taxation | (182 | ) | (240 | ) | (172 | ) | (735 | ) | (482 | ) | (443 | ) | (917 | ) | (722 | ) | (615 | ) | ||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (559 | ) | (667 | ) | (601 | ) | (974 | ) | (629 | ) | (750 | ) | (1,533 | ) | (1,296 | ) | (1,351 | ) | ||
Funding of Group share of joint ventures' and | ||||||||||||||||||||
associates' capital expenditure | (13 | ) | (28 | ) | (72 | ) | (81 | ) | (109 | ) | (7 | ) | (94 | ) | (137 | ) | (79 | ) | ||
Other funding of joint ventures and associates | (18 | ) | (7 | ) | 7 | - | 1 | 6 | (18 | ) | (6 | ) | 13 | |||||||
11 | Exploration and evaluation expenditure | (88 | ) | (89 | ) | (96 | ) | (42 | ) | (35 | ) | (36 | ) | (130 | ) | (124 | ) | (132 | ) | |
Sale of property, plant and equipment | 9 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 13 | 24 | 19 | 16 | 25 | |||||||||||
Purchases less sales of other investments | 67 | (330 | ) | (54 | ) | 16 | 7 | - | 83 | (323 | ) | (54 | ) | |||||||
Funding to Rio Tinto Limited | 5 | (87 | ) | (399 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
Purchase of redeemable preference shares | ||||||||||||||||||||
in Rio Tinto Limited subsidiaries by Rio Tinto | ||||||||||||||||||||
plc subsidiaries | (500 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Capital expenditure and financial investment | (1,097 | ) | (1,205 | ) | (1,214 | ) | (1,071 | ) | (752 | ) | (763 | ) | (1,673 | ) | (1,870 | ) | (1,578 | ) | ||
35 | Purchase of subsidiaries, joint arrangements, | |||||||||||||||||||
joint ventures and associates | - | (1 | ) | (221 | ) | - | (105 | ) | (744 | ) | - | (106 | ) | (958 | ) | |||||
35 | Sale of subsidiaries, joint arrangements, joint | |||||||||||||||||||
ventures and associates | - | 3 | 96 | 405 | 230 | 203 | 405 | 233 | 299 | |||||||||||
Purchases/sales of subsidiaries between | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited and Rio Tinto plc | 1 | (13 | ) | - | (1 | ) | 13 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
Receipt of share buy back proceeds from Rio | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tinto Limited | 1,208 | 115 | 120 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Disposals less acquisitions | 1,209 | 104 | (5 | ) | 404 | 138 | (541 | ) | 405 | 127 | (659 | ) | ||||||||
Equity dividends paid - Rio Tinto plc and | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited shareholders | (645 | ) | (729 | ) | (621 | ) | (465 | ) | (495 | ) | (291 | ) | (833 | ) | (948 | ) | (803 | ) | ||
Cash (outflow)/inflow before management | ||||||||||||||||||||
of liquid resources and financing | 875 | (235 | ) | (635 | ) | 29 | 292 | (241 | ) | 191 | 29 | (590 | ) | |||||||
23 | Net cash (outflow)/inflow from management | |||||||||||||||||||
of liquid resources | (110 | ) | 142 | (12 | ) | 5 | 71 | (6 | ) | (105 | ) | 213 | (18 | ) | ||||||
Ordinary shares in Rio Tinto issued for cash | 20 | 10 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 25 | 15 | 7 | |||||||||||
Ordinary shares in subsidiaries issued | ||||||||||||||||||||
to outside shareholders | - | - | - | 8 | 22 | - | 8 | 22 | - | |||||||||||
23 | Loans (repaid) less received | (794 | ) | 67 | 640 | 592 | (476 | ) | 1 | (202 | ) | (409 | ) | 641 | ||||||
Payment of share buy back proceeds to Rio Tinto plc | - | - | - | (1,208 | ) | (115 | ) | (120 | ) | - | - | - | ||||||||
Loans received/repaid from Rio Tinto plc | - | - | - | (5 | ) | 87 | 399 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Purchase of redeemable preference shares | ||||||||||||||||||||
in Rio Tinto Limited subsidiaries by Rio Tinto | ||||||||||||||||||||
plc subsidiaries | - | - | - | 500 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Management of liquid resources and | ||||||||||||||||||||
financing | (884 | ) | 219 | 641 | (103 | ) | (406 | ) | 275 | (274 | ) | (159 | ) | 630 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
23 | (Decrease)/increase in cash per UK GAAP | (9 | ) | (16 | ) | 6 | (74 | ) | (114 | ) | 34 | (83 | ) | (130 | ) | 40 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Group operating profit | 368 | (19 | ) | 137 | 1,128 | 855 | 1,425 | 1,496 | 831 | 1,562 | ||||||||||
Exceptional charges (all non cash items) | - | 645 | 644 | - | 433 | 71 | - | 1,078 | 715 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
368 | 626 | 781 | 1,128 | 1,288 | 1,496 | 1,496 | 1,909 | 2,277 | ||||||||||||
2 | Depreciation and amortisation | 385 | 423 | 453 | 621 | 531 | 476 | 1,006 | 954 | 929 | ||||||||||
11 | Exploration & evaluation charged against profit | 90 | 94 | 97 | 37 | 36 | 33 | 127 | 130 | 130 | ||||||||||
20 | Provisions | 60 | 33 | 45 | 94 | 25 | 55 | 154 | 58 | 100 | ||||||||||
20 | Utilisation of provisions | (62 | ) | (35 | ) | (54 | ) | (97 | ) | (83 | ) | (94 | ) | (159 | ) | (118 | ) | (148 | ) | |
Change in inventories | (85 | ) | 42 | (97 | ) | 42 | 43 | (130 | ) | (43 | ) | 85 | (227 | ) | ||||||
Change in accounts receivable & prepayments | (52 | ) | 113 | (8 | ) | (58 | ) | 23 | (73 | ) | 154 | 158 | (126 | ) | ||||||
Change in accounts payable and accruals | 180 | 81 | (42 | ) | 150 | (116 | ) | (51 | ) | 66 | (57 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||||
Other items | 91 | 3 | (141 | ) | (4 | ) | 7 | 21 | 87 | 15 | (120 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities | 975 | 1,380 | 1,034 | 1,913 | 1,754 | 1,733 | 2,888 | 3,134 | 2,767 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes on pages A-7 to A-75
form part of these accounts. Material variations from accounting principles
generally
accepted in the United States are set out on pages A-59 to A-75.
A-3
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
BALANCE SHEETS AT 31 DECEMBER
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
Note | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Intangible fixed assets | ||||||||||||||
10 | Goodwill | 253 | 272 | 932 | 743 | 1,185 | 1,015 | |||||||
11 | Exploration and evaluation | 2 | 5 | 67 | 52 | 69 | 57 | |||||||
255 | 277 | 999 | 795 | 1,254 | 1,072 | |||||||||
Tangible fixed assets | ||||||||||||||
12 | Property, plant and equipment | 6,095 | 5,563 | 9,095 | 6,614 | 15,196 | 12,183 | |||||||
Investments | ||||||||||||||
13 | Share of gross assets of joint ventures | 1,845 | 1,757 | 1,388 | 1,352 | 3,233 | 3,109 | |||||||
13 | Share of gross liabilities of joint ventures | (731 | ) | (715 | ) | (279 | ) | (473 | ) | (1,010 | ) | (1,188 | ) | |
1,114 | 1,042 | 1,109 | 879 | 2,223 | 1,921 | |||||||||
13 | Investments in associates/other investments | 2,680 | 1,493 | 62 | 193 | 517 | 656 | |||||||
Total investments | 3,794 | 2,535 | 1,171 | 1,072 | 2,740 | 2,577 | ||||||||
Total fixed assets | 10,144 | 8,375 | 11,265 | 8,481 | 19,190 | 15,832 | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||||||||
15 | Inventories | 968 | 814 | 815 | 688 | 1,783 | 1,502 | |||||||
Accounts receivable and prepayments | ||||||||||||||
16 | Falling due within one year | 1,554 | 1,335 | 1,070 | 957 | 1,674 | 1,598 | |||||||
16 | Falling due after more than one year | 555 | 1,602 | 254 | 105 | 809 | 641 | |||||||
Total accounts receivable | 2,109 | 2,937 | 1,324 | 1,062 | 2,483 | 2,239 | ||||||||
17 | Investments | 230 | 306 | - | - | 230 | 306 | |||||||
17 | Cash | 257 | 174 | 138 | 151 | 395 | 325 | |||||||
Total current assets | 3,564 | 4,231 | 2,277 | 1,901 | 4,891 | 4,372 | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||||||||
18 | Short term borrowings | (542 | ) | (1,359 | ) | (1,652 | ) | (2,007 | ) | (2,194 | ) | (3,366 | ) | |
19 | Accounts payable and accruals | (1,325 | ) | (1,189 | ) | (1,854 | ) | (1,556 | ) | (2,140 | ) | (1,974 | ) | |
Total current liabilities | (1,867 | ) | (2,548 | ) | (3,506 | ) | (3,563 | ) | (4,334 | ) | (5,340 | ) | ||
Net current assets/(liabilities) | 1,697 | 1,683 | (1,229 | ) | (1,662 | ) | 557 | (968 | ) | |||||
Total assets less current liabilities | 11,841 | 10,058 | 10,036 | 6,819 | 19,747 | 14,864 | ||||||||
Liabilities due after one year | ||||||||||||||
22 | Medium and long term borrowings | (1,559 | ) | (1,442 | ) | (2,290 | ) | (1,266 | ) | (3,849 | ) | (2,708 | ) | |
19 | Accounts payable and accruals | (156 | ) | (235 | ) | (166 | ) | (1,135 | ) | (322 | ) | (304 | ) | |
20 | Provisions for liabilities and charges | (2,543 | ) | (2,261 | ) | (1,993 | ) | (1,351 | ) | (4,536 | ) | (3,612 | ) | |
Outside shareholders' interests | (240 | ) | (221 | ) | (1,263 | ) | (557 | ) | (1,003 | ) | (778 | ) | ||
Net Assets | 7,343 | 5,899 | 4,324 | 2,510 | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||||||||
Capital and reserves | ||||||||||||||
Share capital | ||||||||||||||
24 | - Rio Tinto plc | 155 | 154 | - | - | 155 | 154 | |||||||
24 | - Rio Tinto Limited (excl. Rio Tinto plc interest) | - | - | 1,280 | 964 | 1,085 | 816 | |||||||
25 | Share premium account | 1,629 | 1,610 | - | - | 1,629 | 1,610 | |||||||
25 | Other reserves | 261 | 249 | 117 | 86 | 334 | 303 | |||||||
25 | Profit and loss account | 5,298 | 3,886 | 2,927 | 1,460 | 6,834 | 4,579 | |||||||
Equity shareholders' funds | 7,343 | 5,899 | 4,324 | 2,510 | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||||||||
The separate financial statements for Rio Tinto plc and 100 per cent of Rio Tinto Limited shown above are prepared on the basis of the legal ownership of the various operations within each part of the Group. The distinction between the legal and economic interests represented by Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shareholdings is explained on page A-7. The amounts of the consolidated shareholders' funds attributable to the economic interests of Rio Tinto plc shareholders and the shareholders of Rio Tinto Limited other than Rio Tinto plc are as follows:
Rio Tinto plc | Rio Tinto Limited shareholders | |||||||||||
shareholders | other than Rio Tinto plc | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Economic interests in consolidated shareholders' funds | 7,767 | 5,774 | 2,270 | 1,688 | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||||||
Closing percentage of Rio Tinto Limited held by | ||||||||||||
shareholders other than Rio Tinto plc | 62.4 | % | 62.4 | % |
The notes on pages A-7 to A-75
form part of these accounts. Material variations from accounting principles
generally
accepted in the United States are set out on pages A-59 to A-75.
A-4
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
RECONCILIATION WITH AUSTRALIAN GAAP AT 31 DECEMBER 2003
Rio Tinto Group | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
|
|
|||
US$m | US$m | |||
Adjusted earnings reported under UK GAAP | 1,382 | 1,530 | ||
Exceptional items | 126 | (879 | ) | |
Net earnings under UK GAAP | 1,508 | 651 | ||
Increase/(decrease) net of tax in respect of: | ||||
Goodwill amortisation | (164 | ) | (167 | ) |
Adjustment to asset carrying values | - | (19 | ) | |
Taxation | (5 | ) | (13 | ) |
Other | 7 | 3 | ||
Net earnings attributable to members under Australian GAAP | 1,346 | 455 | ||
Earnings per ordinary share under Australian GAAP | 97.7 | c | 33.1 | c |
Diluted earnings per share under Australian GAAP are 0.2 US cents (2002: 0.1 US cents) less than the above earnings per share figures.
Net earnings under United Kingdom generally accepted accounting principles ('UK GAAP') include exceptional gains of US$126 million. In 2002 there was an exceptional charge, for asset write downs and environmental remediation, of US$879 million. The concepts of Adjusted earnings and exceptional items do not exist under Australian generally accepted accounting principles ('Australian GAAP').
Rio Tinto Group | ||||
2003 | 2002 | |||
|
|
|||
US$m | US$m | |||
Shareholders' funds under UK GAAP | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||
Increase/(decrease) net of tax in respect of: | ||||
Goodwill | 872 | 1,044 | ||
Taxation | 69 | 74 | ||
Dividend | 469 | - | ||
Other | (24 | ) | (23 | ) |
Shareholders' funds under Australian GAAP | 11,423 | 8,557 | ||
The Groups financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK GAAP, which differs in certain respects from Australian GAAP. These differences relate principally to the following items, and the effect of each of the adjustments to net earnings and shareholders funds that would be required under Australian GAAP is set out above.
Goodwill
For 1997 and prior years, UK GAAP permitted
the write off of purchased goodwill on acquisitions directly against reserves.
Under Australian GAAP, goodwill is capitalised and amortised by charges against
income over the period during which it is expected to be of benefit, subject
to a maximum of 20 years. Goodwill previously written off directly to reserves
in the UK GAAP financial statements has been reinstated and amortised for the
purpose of the reconciliation statements.
For acquisitions in 1998 and subsequent years, goodwill is capitalised under UK GAAP, in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 10 (FRS 10). Adjustments are required for Australian GAAP purposes where such capitalised goodwill is amortised over periods exceeding 20 years in the UK GAAP accounts.
Taxation
Under UK GAAP, provision for the taxes
arising on remittances of earnings can only be made if the dividends have been
accrued or if there is a binding agreement for the distribution of the earnings.
Under Australian GAAP, provision must be made for tax arising on expected future
remittances of past earnings.
Under UK GAAP, tax benefits associated with goodwill charged directly to reserves, in 1997 and previous years, must be accumulated in the deferred tax provision. This means that the tax benefits are not included in earnings until the related goodwill is charged through the profit and loss account on disposal or closure. For Australian GAAP, no provision is required for such deferred tax because the goodwill that gave rise to these tax benefits was capitalised and gives rise to amortisation charges against profit.
Proposed dividends
Under UK GAAP, ordinary dividends are
recognised in the financial year in respect of which they are paid. Under Australian
GAAP, with effect from 1 January 2003, such dividends are not recognised until
they are declared, determined or publicly recommended by the Board of directors.
Prior to 1 January 2003, Australian GAAP was consistent with UK GAAP.
A-5
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO
LIMITED
STATEMENTS OF TOTAL RECOGNISED GAINS AND
LOSSES
FOR THE YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
Profit for the financial year | ||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | 256 | (321 | ) | (94 | ) | 794 | 509 | 740 | 1,050 | 183 | 646 | |||||||
Joint ventures | 284 | 159 | 157 | 76 | 180 | 187 | 360 | 339 | 344 | |||||||||
Associates | 416 | 357 | 428 | 14 | 47 | 15 | 98 | 129 | 89 | |||||||||
956 | 195 | 491 | 884 | 736 | 942 | 1,508 | 651 | 1,079 | ||||||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | ||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | 553 | 198 | (205 | ) | 1,353 | 374 | (223 | ) | 1,864 | 560 | (423 | ) | ||||||
Joint ventures | - | 3 | (3 | ) | 53 | 11 | (19 | ) | 53 | 13 | (22 | ) | ||||||
Associates | 495 | 137 | (91 | ) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | (4 | ) | |||||||
1,048 | 338 | (299 | ) | 1,409 | 386 | (241 | ) | 1,924 | 579 | (449 | ) | |||||||
Total recognised gains and losses | ||||||||||||||||||
relating to the financial year | ||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | 809 | (123 | ) | (299 | ) | 2,147 | 883 | 517 | 2,914 | 743 | 223 | |||||||
Joint ventures | 284 | 162 | 154 | 129 | 191 | 168 | 413 | 352 | 322 | |||||||||
Associates | 911 | 494 | 337 | 17 | 48 | 16 | 105 | 135 | 85 | |||||||||
2,004 | 533 | 192 | 2,293 | 1,122 | 701 | 3,432 | 1,230 | 630 | ||||||||||
Prior year adjustment | ||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | (149 | ) | 6 | (143 | ) | |||||||||||||
Associates | 12 | - | 10 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
(137 | ) | 6 | (133 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total gains and losses recognised in | ||||||||||||||||||
2002 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | (272 | ) | 889 | 600 | ||||||||||||||
Joint ventures | 162 | 191 | 352 | |||||||||||||||
Associates | 506 | 48 | 145 | |||||||||||||||
396 | 1,128 | 1,097 | ||||||||||||||||
RECONCILIATION OF MOVEMENTS
IN SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS
FOR YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
Profit for the financial year | 956 | 195 | 491 | 884 | 736 | 942 | 1,508 | 651 | 1,079 | |||||||||
Dividends | (683 | ) | (639 | ) | (628 | ) | (320 | ) | (299 | ) | (294 | ) | (882 | ) | (826 | ) | (812 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
273 | (444 | ) | (137 | ) | 564 | 437 | 648 | 626 | (175 | ) | 267 | |||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 1,048 | 338 | (299 | ) | 1,409 | 386 | (241 | ) | 1,924 | 579 | (449 | ) | ||||||
Shares issued by Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto | ||||||||||||||||||
Limited (c) | 21 | 12 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 25 | 15 | 14 | |||||||||
Dividend on DLC share from Rio Tinto Limited | 102 | 91 | - | (164 | ) | (146 | ) | - | - | - | - | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
1,444 | (3 | ) | (423 | ) | 1,814 | 682 | 408 | 2,575 | 419 | (168 | ) | |||||||
Opening shareholders' funds, as restated (b) | 5,899 | 5,902 | 6,325 | 2,510 | 1,828 | 1,420 | 7,462 | 7,043 | 7,211 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Closing shareholders' funds | 7,343 | 5,899 | 5,902 | 4,324 | 2,510 | 1,828 | 10,037 | 7,462 | 7,043 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
(a) | A reconciliation of each individual reserve within shareholders' funds is shown in note 25. |
(b) | Shareholders' funds at 1 January 2002 were originally US$7,176 million, before deducting the prior year adjustment of US$133 million arising on implementation of FRS 19 (see note 1(a)). |
(c) | The carrying value of Rio Tinto plc's investment in Rio Tinto Limited increased by US$1 million in 2003 (2002: US$2 million) as a result of the Rio Tinto Limited share issues during the year. Rio Tinto plc's share of the proceeds received exceeded the dilution of its interest resulting from the share issues. |
The notes on pages A-7 to A-75 form part of
these accounts. Material variations from accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States are set out on pages A-59 to A-75.
A-6
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO
LIMITED
OUTLINE OF DUAL LISTED COMPANIES STRUCTURE
AND BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Rio Tinto Group
Set out on pages A-2 to A-75 are
the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group (the 'Group'), formed through
the dual listed companies ('DLC') merger of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
that created a single economic enterprise, together with separate financial
statements for the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group.
The financial statements of the Group have been presented by both Rio Tinto
plc and Rio Tinto Limited as their consolidated accounts in accordance with
both United Kingdom and Australian legislation and regulations.
Product and geographical analyses of the Group's Operating assets, Turnover, Profit before tax and Net earnings are shown in notes 26 and 27 respectively.
Merger terms
On 21 December 1995, Rio Tinto
plc and Rio Tinto Limited, which are listed respectively on Stock Exchanges
in the United Kingdom and Australia, entered into a dual listed companies
('DLC') merger. This was effected by contractual arrangements between the
Companies and amendments to Rio Tinto plc's Memorandum and Articles of
Association and Rio Tinto Limited's Constitution.
As a result, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited and their respective groups operate together as a single economic enterprise, with neither assuming a dominant role. In particular, the arrangements:
- | confer upon the shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited a common economic interest in both groups; |
- | provide for common boards of directors and a unified management structure; |
- | provide for equalised dividends and capital distributions; and |
- | provide for the shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited to take key decisions, including the election of directors, through an electoral procedure in which the public shareholders of the two Companies effectively vote on a joint basis. |
The merger involved no change in the legal ownership of any assets of Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited, nor any change in the ownership of any existing shares or securities of Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited, nor the issue of any shares, securities or payment by way of consideration, save for the issue by each company of one special voting share to a trustee company which provides the joint electoral procedure for public shareholders. During 2002, each of the parent Companies issued a DLC Dividend Share to facilitate the efficient management of funds within the DLC structure.
Accounting presentation
Under United Kingdom generally
accepted accounting principles, the DLC merger is a business combination that
has been accounted for as a merger under FRS 6 on the basis that it has created
a single economic enterprise for operating and financial reporting purposes.
For the purposes of its filings in the United States under the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the primary financial statements of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group are their separate consolidated financial statements prepared on the basis of the legal ownership of the various operations within each part of the Group. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements for Rio Tinto Limited consolidate Rio Tinto Limited with the Group undertakings under it's legal ownership; and the consolidated financial statements for Rio Tinto plc consolidate Rio Tinto plc with the Group undertakings under it's legal ownership; Rio Tinto Limited is included on an equity basis that reflects Rio Tinto plc's average 37.6 per cent (2002: 37.6 per cent) ownership of Rio Tinto Limited during the year.
The DLC merger between Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited has the effect that their shareholders have substantially the same economic interests as if they held shares in a single enterprise which owned all of the assets of both companies. The Directors therefore consider that the combined financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group provide the most meaningful financial representation of the state of affairs, profit and cash flows.
The financial statements are presented in US dollars as most Group revenues are denominated in US dollars, as are many of the Group's costs. In explaining key features and trends of Group financial performance, the US dollar provides a more consistent view which should correspond more closely to underlying business performance.
A-7
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO
TINTO LIMITED
OUTLINE OF DUAL LISTED COMPANIES STRUCTURE
AND BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Australian Corporations Act
The financial
statements are drawn up in accordance with an order, under section 340 of the
Australian Corporations Act 2001, issued by the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission ('ASIC') on 21 July 2003. The main provisions of the order are that
the financial statements are:
- | to be made out in accordance with United Kingdom requirements applicable to consolidated accounts; |
- | to be expressed in United States dollars, but may also be expressed in United Kingdom and Australian currencies; and |
- | to include a reconciliation from United Kingdom GAAP to Australian GAAP (see page A-5). |
For futher details of the ASIC class order relief see page 134 of the 2003 Annual report and financial statements.
United Kingdom Companies Act
In order
to present a true and fair view of the Rio Tinto Group, in accordance with FRS
6, the principles of merger accounting have been adopted. This represents a departure
from the provision of the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985 ('the Companies Act
1985'), which sets out the conditions for merger accounting based on the assumption
that a merger is effected through the issue of equity shares.
The main consequence of adopting merger rather than acquisition accounting is that the balance sheet of the merged Group includes the assets and liabilities of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited at their carrying values prior to the merger, subject to adjustments to achieve uniformity of accounting policies, rather than at their fair values at the date of the merger.
In the particular circumstances of the merger, the effect of applying acquisition accounting cannot reasonably be quantified.
In order that the financial statements should present a true and fair view, it is necessary to differ from the presentational requirements of the Companies Act 1985 by including amounts attributable to both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited public shareholders in the capital and reserves shown in the balance sheet and in the profit for the financial year. The Companies Act 1985 would require presentation of the capital and reserves and profit for the year attributable to Rio Tinto Limited public shareholders (set out on pages A-2 and A-4) as a minority interest in the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group. This presentation would not give a true and fair view of the effect of the Sharing Agreement under which the position of all public shareholders is as nearly as possible the same as if they held shares in a single company.
A-8
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO
LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Principal accounting policies
(a) Basis of preparation - FRS 19 - 'Deferred Tax' was adopted in 2002. Prior to the adoption of FRS 19, Rio Tinto provided for deferred tax where, in the opinion of the directors, it was probable that a timing difference would reverse within the foreseeable future. Under FRS 19, full provision is made for deferred taxation on all timing differences that have arisen but not reversed at the balance sheet date, except in limited circumstances.
The balance sheet at 31 December 2001 was restated following the implementation of FRS 19, which reduced shareholders' funds by US$133 million. The effect of the restatement is shown in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses on page A-6. The restatement also included an increase in deferred tax provisions of US$57 million, an increase in the investment in associates of US$10 million and a reduction of US$86 million in property, plant and equipment. The application of FRS 19 did not impact significantly on net earnings for either 2002 or 2001. Accordingly, prior year earnings were not restated.
The Group's accounting policies comply with applicable UK accounting standards and are consistent with last year. As explained in the section headed Outline of dual listed companies' structure and basis of financial statements, the accounting policies depart from the requirements of the UK Companies Act in order to provide a true and fair view of the merger between Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited.
(b) Basis of consolidation - The financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group consist of the consolidation of the accounts of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited and their respective subsidiary undertakings ('subsidiaries'). The financial statements of the Rio Tinto plc part of the Group consist of the consolidation of the accounts of Rio Tinto plc and its subsidiaries. Within these financial statements Rio Tinto plc equity accounts for its 37.6 per cent interest in Rio Tinto Limited. The financial statements of the Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group consist of the consolidation of the accounts of Rio Tinto Limited and its subsidiaries.
The Financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis. The Group's shares of the assets, liabilities, earnings and reserves of associated undertakings ('associates') and joint ventures are included in the Group financial statements using the equity and gross equity accounting methods respectively. The Group consolidates its own share of the assets, liabilities, income and expenditure of joint arrangements that are not entities.
(c) Turnover - Turnover comprises sales to third parties at invoiced amounts, with most sales being priced ex works, free on board (fob) or cost, insurance and freight (cif). A large proportion of Group production is sold under medium to long term contracts and is included in sales when deliveries are made. Gross turnover shown in the profit and loss account includes the Group's share of the turnover of joint ventures and associates. By product revenues are included in turnover.
(d) Shipping and handling costs - All shipping and handling costs incurred by the Group are recognised as operating costs. Amounts billed to customers in respect of shipping and handling, where the Group is responsible for the carriage, insurance and freight, are classified as revenue. If, however, the Group is acting solely as an agent, amounts billed to customers are credited to operating costs.
(e) Currency translation - Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate ruling at the date of transaction or, where foreign currency forward contracts have been arranged, at contractual rates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at year end exchange rates, or at a contractual rate if applicable.
On consolidation, profit and loss account items are translated into US dollars at average rates of exchange. Balance sheet items are translated into US dollars at year end exchange rates. Certain non-United States resident companies, whose functional currency is the US dollar, account in that currency.
The Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars and a significant proportion of the Group's US dollar debt is located in subsidiaries having functional currencies other than the US dollar. Exchange gains and losses relating to US dollar debt impact on the profit and loss accounts of such subsidiaries. However, such exchange gains and losses are excluded from the Group's profit and loss account on consolidation, with a corresponding adjustment to reserves. This means that financing in US dollars impacts in a consistent manner on the Group's consolidated accounts irrespective of the functional currency of the particular subsidiary where the debt is located. Exchange differences on the translation of the net operating assets of companies with functional currencies other than the US dollar, less offsetting exchange differences on net debt in currencies other than the US dollar financing those net assets, are dealt with through reserves.
All other exchange differences are charged or credited to the profit and loss account in the year in which they arise, except as set out below in note (p) relating to derivative contracts.
A-9
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO
LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Principal accounting policies (continued)
(f) Goodwill and intangible assets - Goodwill represents the difference between the cost of acquisition and the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets arising on acquisitions after 31 December 1997 are capitalised in accordance with FRS 10. These assets are amortised over their useful economic lives, which may exceed 20 years. Amortisation is charged on a straight line or units of production basis as appropriate. In 1997 and previous years, goodwill was eliminated against reserves in the year of acquisition as a matter of accounting policy. Such goodwill was not reinstated on implementation of FRS 10; but on sale or closure of a business, any related goodwill eliminated against reserves is charged in the profit and loss account.
(g) Exploration and evaluation - During the initial stage of a project, full provision is made in respect of the costs thereof by charge against profits for the year. Expenditure on a project after it has reached a stage at which there is a high degree of confidence in its viability is carried forward and transferred to tangible fixed assets if the project proceeds. If a project does not prove viable, all irrecoverable costs associated with the project are written off. If an undeveloped project is sold, any gain or loss is included in operating profit, such transactions being a normal part of the Group's activities. Where expenditure is carried forward in respect of a project which may not proceed to commercial development for some time, provision is made against the possibility of non-development by charge against profits over a period of up to seven years. When it is decided to proceed with development, any provisions made in previous years are reversed to the extent that the relevant costs are recoverable.
(h) Tangible fixed assets - The cost of a tangible fixed asset comprises its purchase price and any costs directly attributable to bringing it into working condition for its intended use. Costs associated with a start up period are capitalised where the asset is available for use but incapable of operating at normal levels without a commissioning period. Net interest before tax payable on borrowings related to construction or development projects is capitalised until the point when substantially all the activities that are necessary to make the asset ready for the use are complete. Once a mining project has been established as commercially viable, expenditure other than that on buildings, plant and equipment is capitalised under mining properties and leases together with any amount transferred from exploration and evaluation. Such expenditure is amortised against profits, applying the same principles as for other tangible fixed assets.
(i) Deferred Stripping costs - Stripping (i.e. overburden and other waste removal) costs incurred in the development of a mine, before production commences, are capitalised as part of the investment in the construction of the mine and subsequently amortised, generally over the ore production during the life of the operation.
Rio Tinto defers stripping costs incurred during the production stage of its operations for those operations where this is the most appropriate basis for matching revenue and costs, and the effect is material.
The stripping ratio is generally calculated by dividing the tonnage of waste mined by the tonnage of ore mined during the relevant period. The costs to be deferred (or accrued) are those relating to the excess (or shortfall) of the current period stripping ratio compared with that for the life of the mine. The life of mine stripping ratio is based on the proven and probable reserves of the operation.
In some operations, there are distinct periods of new development during the production stage of the mine. These may, for example, relate to a separate ore body or discrete section of the ore body. The new development will be characterised by a major departure from the life of mine stripping ratio. Excess stripping costs during such periods are deferred and subsequently amortised pro-rata, generally to the tonnage of ore mined in the remaining life of the operation.
In operations that experience material fluctuations in the stripping ratio on a year by year basis over the life of the mine, deferred stripping costs are subsequently charged against reported profits to the extent that, in subsequent periods, the stripping ratio falls short of the life of mine stripping ratio.
(j) Depreciation and carrying values of fixed assets - Depreciation of tangible fixed assets is calculated on a straight line or units of production basis, as appropriate. Assets are fully depreciated over their economic lives, or over the remaining life of the mine if shorter. Depreciation rates for the principal assets of the Group vary from two and a half per cent to ten per cent per annum.
Tangible and intangible fixed assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In addition, goodwill is reviewed for impairment at the end of the first complete financial year after the relevant acquisition and, where the goodwill is being amortised over a period exceeding 20 years, annually thereafter. When a review for impairment is conducted, the recoverable amount is assessed by reference to the net present value of expected future cash flows of the relevant income generating unit, or disposal value if higher. The discount rate applied is based upon the Group's weighted average cost of capital with appropriate adjustment for the risks associated with the relevant unit. Estimates of future net cash flows are based on ore reserves and mineral resources for which there is a high degree of confidence of economic extraction.
(k) Determination of ore reserves - Rio Tinto estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources based on information compiled by Competent Persons (as defined in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves of September 1999 (the JORC code)). Reserves and, for certain mines, resources determined in this way are used in the calculation of depreciation, amortisation, impairment and close down and restoration costs.
A-10
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO
LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Principal accounting policies (continued)
(l) Provisions for close down and restoration and for environmental clean up costs - Both for close down and restoration and for environmental clean up costs, provision is made in the accounting period when the related environmental disturbance occurs, based on the net present value of estimated future costs.
The amortisation or 'unwinding' of the discount applied in establishing the net present value of provisions is charged to the profit and loss account in each accounting period. The amortisation of the discount is shown as a financing cost rather than as an operating cost.
For close down and restoration costs, which include the dismantling and demolition of infrastructure, removal of residual materials and remediation of disturbed areas, movements in provisions other than the amortisation of the discount, such as those resulting from changes in the cost estimates, lives of operations or discount rates, are capitalised and depreciated over future production.
(m) Inventories - Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost for raw materials and stores is purchase price and for partly processed and saleable products is generally the cost of production, including the appropriate proportion of depreciation and overheads. Inventories are valued on a first in, first out ('FIFO') basis.
(n) Deferred tax - Full provision is made for deferred taxation on all timing differences that have arisen but not reversed at the balance sheet date, except in limited circumstances. The main exceptions are as follows: - Tax payable on the future remittance of the past earnings of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures is provided only to the extent that dividends have been accrued or there is a binding agreement to distribute such past earnings.
- | Deferred tax is not recognised on revaluations of non-monetary assets arising on acquisitions unless there is a binding agreement to sell the asset and the gain or loss expected to arise from the disposal has been recognised. |
- | Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be recovered. |
Provisions for deferred tax are
made in respect of tax benefits related to goodwill that was charged directly
to reserves on acquisitions made prior to 1998. Such provisions are released
when the related goodwill is charged through the profit and loss account
on disposal or closure.
Deferred tax balances are not discounted to their present value.
(o) Post retirement benefits - In accordance with SSAP 24, the expected costs of post retirement benefits under defined benefit arrangements are charged to the profit and loss account so as to spread the costs over the service lives of employees entitled to those benefits. Variations from the regular cost are spread on a straight line basis over the expected average remaining service lives of relevant current employees. Costs are assessed in accordance with the advice of qualified actuaries.
(p) Financial instruments - The Group's policy with regard to 'Treasury management and financial instruments' is set out in the Financial review on page 32 of the Annual report and financial statements. When the Group enters into derivative contracts these transactions are designed to reduce exposures related to assets and liabilities, firm commitments or anticipated transactions, and are therefore accounted for as hedges. Amounts receivable and payable in respect of interest rate swaps are recognised as an adjustment to net interest over the life of the contract. Gains or losses on foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps relating to financial assets and liabilities are matched against the losses or gains on the hedged items, either in the profit and loss account or through reserves as appropriate. Gains and losses on financial instruments relating to firm commitments or anticipated transactions for revenue items are deferred and recognised when the hedged transaction occurs. Gains and losses on financial instruments relating to firm commitments or anticipated transactions for capital expenditure are capitalised and depreciated in line with the underlying asset. The cash flows from these contracts are classified in a manner consistent with the underlying nature of the related transaction.
A-11
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
2 | Net operating costs |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Note | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||||||
Operating costs from continuing operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
Raw materials and consumables | 1,455 | 1,277 | 1,305 | 1,520 | 1,314 | 1,408 | 2,975 | 2,591 | 2,713 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortisation (a) | 385 | 423 | 453 | 621 | 531 | 476 | 1,006 | 954 | 929 | |||||||||||
3 | Employment costs | 845 | 687 | 626 | 821 | 650 | 534 | 1,666 | 1,337 | 1,160 | ||||||||||
Royalties and other mining taxes | 220 | 204 | 183 | 219 | 186 | 174 | 439 | 390 | 357 | |||||||||||
Decrease/(increase) in inventories | 4 | 18 | (47 | ) | 51 | 63 | (98 | ) | 55 | 81 | (145 | ) | ||||||||
Other external costs (a) | 656 | 558 | 438 | 795 | 585 | 454 | 1,451 | 1,143 | 892 | |||||||||||
20 | Provisions (a) | 60 | 33 | 45 | 94 | 25 | 55 | 154 | 58 | 100 | ||||||||||
11 | Exploration and evaluation | 90 | 94 | 97 | 37 | 36 | 33 | 127 | 130 | 130 | ||||||||||
Research and development | 17 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 8 | 21 | 23 | 25 | 39 | |||||||||||
Net exchange losses/(gains) on monetary items | 40 | 28 | (62 | ) | 83 | 13 | 4 | 123 | 41 | (58 | ) | |||||||||
Costs included above qualifying for capitalisation | (68 | ) | (33 | ) | (52 | ) | (100 | ) | (80 | ) | (61 | ) | (168 | ) | (113 | ) | (113 | ) | ||
Other operating income | (40 | ) | (3 | ) | (62 | ) | (79 | ) | (105 | ) | (67 | ) | (119 | ) | (103 | ) | (129 | ) | ||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net operating costs before exceptional | ||||||||||||||||||||
charges | 3,664 | 3,303 | 2,942 | 4,068 | 3,226 | 2,933 | 7,732 | 6,534 | 5,875 | |||||||||||
Exceptional charges | - | 645 | 644 | - | 433 | 71 | - | 1,078 | 715 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
3,664 | 3,948 | 3,586 | 4,068 | 3,659 | 3,004 | 7,732 | 7,612 | 6,590 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
(a) | The above detailed analysis of costs is before exceptional charges. Including exceptional charges, the total charge for depreciation and amortisation for the Rio Tinto Group was US$1,893 million in 2002 and US$1,630 million in 2001. The charge for provisions was US$174 million in 2002 and US$100 million in 2001; and other external costs were US$1,166 million in 2002 and US$906 million in 2001. |
The total charge for depreciation and amortisation for Rio Tinto plc was US$929 million in 2002 and US$1,097 million in 2001, the charge for provisions was US$149 million in 2002 and US$45 million in 2001 and other external costs were US$581 million in 2002 and US$438 million in 2001. | |
The total charge for depreciation and amortisation for Rio Tinto Limited was US$964 million in 2002 and US$533 million in 2001 and other external costs were US$585 million in 2002 and US$468 million in 2001. | |
(b) | Information on auditor's remuneration is included in note 37. |
3 | Employee costs |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||||
Employment costs, excluding joint ventures and associates: | ||||||||||||||||||||
- Wages and salaries | 730 | 647 | 678 | 785 | 615 | 524 | 1,515 | 1,262 | 1,202 | |||||||||||
- Social security costs | 59 | 55 | 54 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 72 | 68 | 65 | |||||||||||
- Net post retirement cost/(credit) (a) | 101 | 21 | (79 | ) | 83 | 58 | 34 | 184 | 79 | (45 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
890 | 723 | 653 | 881 | 686 | 569 | 1,771 | 1,409 | 1,222 | ||||||||||||
Less: charged within provisions | (45 | ) | (36 | ) | (27 | ) | (60 | ) | (36 | ) | (35 | ) | (105 | ) | (72 | ) | (62 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
845 | 687 | 626 | 821 | 650 | 534 | 1,666 | 1,337 | 1,160 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | The net post retirement cost/(credit) includes the gradual recognition under SSAP 24 of the deficits and surpluses in a number of the Group's defined benefit pension schemes. | |
(b) | UITF Abstract 17 requires the intrinsic value of share options to be recognised as a cost. However, the Group's SAYE schemes are Inland Revenue approved schemes or equivalent non-UK schemes, and are, therefore, exempt from this requirement. None of the Group's other share option schemes involve granting new options at a discount to market value. |
A-12
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
4 | Exceptional items |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||||||||
Effect of exceptional items on line items | |||||||||||||||||||||
in the profit and loss account: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Group operating profit | - | (645 | ) | (644 | ) | - | (433 | ) | (71 | ) | - | (1,078 | ) | (715 | ) | ||||||
Share of operating profit of joint ventures | - | (16 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (16 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Share of operating profit of associates | - | (94 | ) | (27 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Profit on disposal of subsidiary, joint | |||||||||||||||||||||
venture and associate | 47 | - | - | 126 | - | - | 126 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Taxation | - | - | 113 | - | 42 | 19 | - | 42 | 132 | ||||||||||||
Share of taxation of associates | - | 9 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Attributable to outside shareholders (equity) | - | 7 | - | - | 166 | - | - | 173 | - | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
47 | (739 | ) | (551 | ) | 126 | (225 | ) | (52 | ) | 126 | (879 | ) | (583 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | The exceptional items analysed above, and within the profit and loss account, are added back in arriving at adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share. |
(b) | In 2003 the exceptional gains total US$126 million, of which US$19 million related to associates and US$107 million to joint ventures. These gains arose on sales of operations. These transactions did not give rise to a tax charge. |
The exceptional charges of US$879 million recognised in 2002 comprised provisions of US$763 million for the impairment of asset carrying values and a charge of US$116 million related to environmental remediation works at Kennecott Utah Copper ('KUC'). Of the impairment charge, US$480 million related to KUC and US$235 million related to the Iron Ore Company of Canada ('IOC'). Of the total charge, US$16 million before tax related to joint ventures and the remainder to subsidiaries. | |
Most of the 2002 impairment provisions were calculated so as to ensure that the carrying value of the relevant assets were the same as the present value of the expected future cash flows relating to those assets. The discount rates used in calculating the present value of expected future cash flows were derived from the Group's weighted average cost of capital, with appropriate risk adjustments. When adjusted to include inflation and grossed up at the Group's average tax rate for 2002, before exceptional items, the discount rate applied to the relevant income generating units was equivalent to 10 per cent, except for gold production for which a rate equivalent to 7 per cent was used. The impairment provision against IOC aligned the carrying value with the value negotiated between shareholders during 2002 as part of a financial restructuring exercise. | |
(c) | In preparing financial statements in accordance with the Companies Act and UK GAAP certain information is presented that would be viewed as non-GAAP under regulations issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Group has described such items, provided disclosure on the effects and reasons for presentation along with a condensed income statement using the format prescribed by the SEC. The disclosure of asset write downs in 2001 and 2002, as well as the disclosure of the profit on disposal of subsidiary, joint venture and associate in 2003, as exceptional items is expressly permitted under FRS3. Otherwise, disclosure of these amounts as exceptional items would be prohibited within the Form 20-F. Management consider these asset write downs and this profit or disposal to be exceptional in nature because large items of this type do not occur regularly. Their impact on earnings may be positive in some years and negative in others. The environmental remediation charge in 2002 is similarly presented as an exceptional item under FRS3. Management consider this charge to be exceptional in nature because large items of this type do not occur regularly.Such items do not reflect the performance of the business unit to which they relate in the particular year in which they are recognised. |
A-13
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
5 | Net interest payable and similar charges |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||||
Interest payable on | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bank borrowings | (26 | ) | (21 | ) | (22 | ) | (30 | ) | (23 | ) | (35 | ) | (56 | ) | (44 | ) | (57 | ) | ||
Other loans | (74 | ) | (95 | ) | (111 | ) | (110 | ) | (112 | ) | (184 | ) | (153 | ) | (189 | ) | (295 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
(100 | ) | (116 | ) | (133 | ) | (140 | ) | (135 | ) | (219 | ) | (209 | ) | (233 | ) | (352 | ) | |||
Amounts capitalised | 12 | 14 | 9 | 27 | 8 | 12 | 39 | 22 | 21 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
(88 | ) | (102 | ) | (124 | ) | (113 | ) | (127 | ) | (207 | ) | (170 | ) | (211 | ) | (331 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Interest receivable and similar income from fixed | ||||||||||||||||||||
asset investments | ||||||||||||||||||||
Joint ventures | 8 | 10 | 14 | - | - | - | 8 | 10 | 14 | |||||||||||
Associates | 31 | 18 | - | 5 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 | |||||||||||
Other investments | 4 | 9 | 3 | - | - | - | 4 | 9 | 3 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
43 | 37 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 20 | 23 | ||||||||||||
Other interest receivable | 3 | 13 | 22 | 11 | 17 | 30 | 14 | 30 | 52 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
46 | 50 | 39 | 16 | 18 | 36 | 31 | 50 | 75 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Group net interest payable | (42 | ) | (52 | ) | (85 | ) | (97 | ) | (109 | ) | (171 | ) | (139 | ) | (161 | ) | (256 | ) | ||
Share of joint ventures' net interest payable (a) | (11 | ) | (20 | ) | (26 | ) | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | (13 | ) | (26 | ) | (32 | ) | ||
Share of associates' net interest payable (a) | (85 | ) | (84 | ) | (114 | ) | (1 | ) | (9 | ) | (13 | ) | (54 | ) | (50 | ) | (59 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net interest payable | (138 | ) | (156 | ) | (225 | ) | (100 | ) | (124 | ) | (190 | ) | (206 | ) | (237 | ) | (347 | ) | ||
6 | Amortisation of discount | (69 | ) | (39 | ) | (45 | ) | (36 | ) | (23 | ) | (19 | ) | (92 | ) | (54 | ) | (57 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net interest payable and similar charges | (207 | ) | (195 | ) | (270 | ) | (136 | ) | (147 | ) | (209 | ) | (298 | ) | (291 | ) | (404 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | The Group's share of net interest payable by joint ventures and associates relates to its share of the net debt of joint ventures and associates, which is disclosed in note 14. | |
(b) | Interest of US$31 million payable from Rio Tinto Limited to Rio Tinto plc is included as 'Interest receivable from associates' for Rio Tinto plc and as 'Interest payable on other loans' for Rio Tinto Limited. | |
6 | Amortisation of discount |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | (63 | ) | (40 | ) | (37 | ) | (34 | ) | (22 | ) | (18 | ) | (97 | ) | (62 | ) | (55 | ) | ||
Share of joint ventures | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||
Share of associates | (13 | ) | (8 | ) | (7 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
(77 | ) | (49 | ) | (45 | ) | (36 | ) | (23 | ) | (19 | ) | (100 | ) | (64 | ) | (57 | ) | |||
Amounts capitalised (b) | 8 | 10 | - | - | - | - | 8 | 10 | - | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Amortisation of discount | (69 | ) | (39 | ) | (45 | ) | (36 | ) | (23 | ) | (19 | ) | (92 | ) | (54 | ) | (57 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | The amortisation of discount relates principally to provisions for close down and restoration and for environmental clean up costs as explained in accounting policy 1(l). It also includes the unwind of the discount on non-interest bearing long term accounts payable. |
(b) | Amounts capitalised relate to costs on specific projects for which operations have not yet commenced. |
(c) | Under US GAAP 'Amortisation of discount' would be accounted for as an operating cost. |
A-14
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
7 Taxation charge for the year
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
UK taxation | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporation tax at 30% | ||||||||||||||||||
Current | 99 | 58 | 51 | - | (4 | ) | - | 99 | 54 | 51 | ||||||||
Deduct: relief for overseas taxes | (96 | ) | (63 | ) | (63 | ) | - | - | - | (96 | ) | (63 | ) | (63 | ) | |||
3 | (5 | ) | (12 | ) | - | (4 | ) | - | 3 | (9 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||
Deferred | (7 | ) | 11 | 48 | - | 1 | - | (7 | ) | 12 | 48 | |||||||
(4 | ) | 6 | 36 | - | (3 | ) | - | (4 | ) | 3 | 36 | |||||||
Australian taxation | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporation tax at 30% | ||||||||||||||||||
Current | 3 | 3 | - | 297 | 342 | 364 | 300 | 345 | 364 | |||||||||
Deferred | (2 | ) | - | - | 11 | 21 | 28 | 9 | 21 | 28 | ||||||||
1 | 3 | - | 308 | 363 | 392 | 309 | 366 | 392 | ||||||||||
Other countries taxation | ||||||||||||||||||
Current | 20 | 123 | 119 | 27 | 40 | 34 | 47 | 163 | 153 | |||||||||
Deferred | (10 | ) | 10 | 7 | (17 | ) | (17 | ) | 17 | (27 | ) | (7 | ) | 24 | ||||
10 | 133 | 126 | 10 | 23 | 51 | 20 | 156 | 177 | ||||||||||
Joint ventures - charge for year (a) | 123 | 78 | 84 | 37 | 87 | 92 | 160 | 165 | 176 | |||||||||
Associates - charge for year (including | ||||||||||||||||||
share of tax relief on exceptional asset | ||||||||||||||||||
write-downs for Rio Tinto plc of: (2002: US$9 | ||||||||||||||||||
million) (2001: US$7 million) (a) | 211 | 222 | 245 | 5 | (5 | ) | 6 | 82 | 60 | 69 | ||||||||
Subsidiary companies' deferred tax | ||||||||||||||||||
related to exceptional charges (e) | - | - | (113 | ) | - | (42 | ) | (19 | ) | - | (42 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||
341 | 442 | 378 | 360 | 423 | 522 | 567 | 708 | 718 | ||||||||||
Prima facie tax reconciliation | ||||||||||||||||||
Profit on ordinary activities before taxation | 1,305 | 715 | 983 | 1,255 | 1,033 | 1,536 | 2,094 | 1,311 | 1,983 | |||||||||
Prima facie tax payable at UK and Australian | ||||||||||||||||||
rate of 30% | 392 | 215 | 295 | 377 | 310 | 461 | 628 | 393 | 595 | |||||||||
Impact of exceptional items | - | 227 | 201 | (38 | ) | 130 | 21 | (38 | ) | 328 | 214 | |||||||
Other permanent differences | ||||||||||||||||||
Other tax rates applicable outside the UK and | ||||||||||||||||||
Australia | 49 | 55 | 87 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 59 | 56 | 95 | |||||||||
Permanently disallowed amortisation/depreciation | 22 | 22 | 22 | 48 | 44 | 45 | 53 | 51 | 52 | |||||||||
Research, development and other investment | ||||||||||||||||||
allowances | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | - | (4 | ) | (10 | ) | (5 | ) | (7 | ) | (13 | ) | |
Resource depletion allowances | (54 | ) | (58 | ) | (52 | ) | - | - | - | (54 | ) | (58 | ) | (52 | ) | |||
Other (i) | (31 | ) | 25 | (58 | ) | (8 | ) | 1 | 3 | (24 | ) | 24 | (57 | ) | ||||
(19 | ) | 39 | (7 | ) | 54 | 42 | 48 | 29 | 66 | 25 | ||||||||
Other deferral of taxation | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital allowances in excess of other | ||||||||||||||||||
depreciation charges | (30 | ) | (82 | ) | (114 | ) | (27 | ) | (12 | ) | (24 | ) | (48 | ) | (69 | ) | (131 | ) |
Other timing differences | 4 | 19 | 22 | 5 | (4 | ) | (9 | ) | 14 | - | 17 | |||||||
Total timing differences related to the current year | (26 | ) | (63 | ) | (92 | ) | (22 | ) | (16 | ) | (33 | ) | (34 | ) | (69 | ) | (114 | ) |
Current taxation charge for the year | 347 | 418 | 397 | 371 | 466 | 497 | 585 | 718 | 720 | |||||||||
Deferred tax recognised on timing differences | 26 | 63 | (28 | ) | 22 | (26 | ) | 12 | 34 | 27 | (18 | ) | ||||||
Deferred tax impact of changes in tax rates | - | (15 | ) | - | - | 3 | - | - | (14 | ) | - | |||||||
Other deferred tax items (j) | (32 | ) | (24 | ) | 9 | (33 | ) | (20 | ) | 13 | (52 | ) | (23 | ) | 16 | |||
Total taxation charge for the year | 341 | 442 | 378 | 360 | 423 | 522 | 567 | 708 | 718 | |||||||||
A-15
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
7 | Taxation charge for the year (continued) |
(a) | Some tax recognised by subsidiary holding companies is presented in these accounts as part of the tax charge on the profits of the joint ventures and associates to which it relates. |
(b) | A benefit of US$34 million was recognised in 2003 (2002: US$20 million, 2001: US$41 million) for operating losses that are expected to be recovered in future years. |
(c) | Adjustments of prior year accruals reduced the total tax charge for the Group by US$28 million (2002: US$16 million). |
(d) | The 2003 tax charge was reduced by US$11 million (US$8 million excluding outside shareholder interests) as a result of the proposed entry into the Australian tax consolidation regime with effect from 1 January 2003. |
(e) | The deferred tax relief on exceptional charges primarily relates to ‘Other countries’. |
(f) | A current tax charge of US$194 million (2002: charge of US$48 million, 2001: relief of US$58 million) and a deferred tax charge of US$162 million (2002: charge of US$13 million, 2001: relief of US$11 million) were dealt with in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses ('STRGL'). These tax charges relate to exchange gains and losses which are themselves dealt with in the STRGL. |
(g) | The Group's effective tax rate for 2003, including exceptional items, is 27.1 per cent (2002: 54.0 per cent, 2001: 36.2 per cent). Excluding exceptional items (for which the tax rates were substantially different from those applying to routine transactions) the underlying effective tax rate was 28.8 per cent (2002: 31.2 per cent, 2001: 31.5 per cent). |
(h) | Tax paid during the year, of US$917 million, includes an amount of US$106 million relating to the disputed tax assessment from the Australian Tax Office described in note 29. The amount paid has been recorded as a receivable in these accounts because the Directors believe that the relevant tax assessments are not sustainable. Tax payments also include amounts related to exchange gains on US dollar debt, which are recorded directly in the Statement of total recognised gains and losses. |
(i) | 'Other' impacts on the current tax charge include the benefit of reduced Alternative Minimum Tax payable in the United States. |
(j) | Other deferred tax items' include benefits from adjustment of prior year accruals (see (c) above) and from Australian tax consolidation (see (d) above). |
8 Dividends | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc Ordinary Interim dividend | 320 | 314 | 213 | |||||||||
Rio Tinto plc Ordinary Final dividend | 363 | 325 | 415 | |||||||||
683 | 639 | 628 | ||||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited Ordinary Interim dividend | 150 | 146 | 100 | |||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited Ordinary Final dividend | 170 | 153 | 194 | |||||||||
Less dividends paid to Rio Tinto plc (e) | (121 | ) | (112 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||||
Rio Tinto Limited dividends paid to public shareholders (b) | 199 | 187 | 184 | |||||||||
Total dividends paid to public shareholders | 882 | 826 | 812 | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
Rates per share | Number of shares | |||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc Interim (pence) | 18.45 | p | 18.87 | p | 14.03 | p | 1,066.1 | 1,065.4 | 1,064.5 | |||
Rio Tinto plc Final (pence) | 18.68 | p | 18.60 | p | 27.65 | p | 1,066.7 | 1,065.5 | 1,064.6 | |||
37.13 | p | 37.47 | p | 41.68 | p | |||||||
Rio Tinto Limited Interim - fully franked at 30% (Australian Cents) | 45.02 | c | 54.06 | c | 39.42 | c | 499.0 | 498.8 | 498.3 | |||
Less shares held by Rio Tinto plc | (187.4 | ) | (187.4 | ) | (187.4 | ) | ||||||
Shares held by public shareholders (b) | 311.6 | 311.4 | 310.9 | |||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited Final - fully franked at 30% (Australian Cents) | 44.68 | c | 51.87 | c | 75.85 | c | 499.0 | 498.8 | 498.4 | |||
Less shares held by Rio Tinto plc | (187.4 | ) | (187.4 | ) | (187.4 | ) | ||||||
89.70 | c | 105.93 | c | 115.27 | c | |||||||
Shares held by public shareholders (b) | 311.6 | 311.4 | 311.0 | |||||||||
(a) | The 2003 dividends have been based on the following US cents per share amounts: interim - 30.0 cents, final - 34.0 cents. |
(b) | For the Group accounts, the number of shares on which the Rio Tinto Limited dividends are based excludes those shares held by Rio Tinto plc, in order that the dividends shown represent those paid to public shareholders. |
(c) | The proposed Rio Tinto Limited dividends will be franked out of existing franking credits or out of franking credits arising from the payment of income tax during 2004. |
(d) | It is expected that Rio Tinto Limited will be forming a tax consolidated group in Australia with effect from 1 January 2003. As a consequence, franking credits of the wholly owned subsidiaries are transferred to the parent entity, Rio Tinto Limited. The approximate amount of the Rio Tinto Limited tax consolidated group retained profits and reserves that could be distributed as dividends and franked out of the existing credits which arose from net payments of income tax in respect of periods up to 31 December 2003 (after deducting franking credits on the proposed final dividend) is US$2,042 million. |
(e) | In addition, Rio Tinto Limited paid a dividend of US$164 million (2002: US$146 million) to Rio Tinto plc on the DLC Dividend Share. |
A-16
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
9 Earnings per ordinary share | ||||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Average number of ordinary shares in issue | ||||||||||||||||||
(million) (b) | 1,066 | 1,065 | 1,064 | 499 | 499 | 498 | 1,378 | 1,377 | 1,375 | |||||||||
Profit for the financial year (US$m) | 956 | 195 | 491 | 884 | 736 | 942 | 1,508 | 651 | 1,079 | |||||||||
Exceptional items (US$m) (note 4) | (47 | ) | 739 | 551 | (126 | ) | 225 | 52 | (126 | ) | 879 | 583 | ||||||
Adjusted earnings (US$m) | 909 | 934 | 1,042 | 758 | 961 | 994 | 1,382 | 1,530 | 1,662 | |||||||||
Earnings per ordinary share (US cents) | 89.7 | c | 18.3 | c | 46.1 | c | 177.2 | c | 147.6 | c | 189.0 | c | 109.5 | c | 47.3 | c | 78.5 | c |
Exceptional items per ordinary share (US cents) | (4.4 | )c | 69.4 | c | 51.8 | c | (25.3 | )c | 45.1 | c | 10.4 | c | (9.2 | )c | 63.9 | c | 42.4 | c |
Adjusted earnings per ordinary share (US cents) | 85.3 | c | 87.7 | c | 97.9 | c | 151.9 | c | 192.7 | c | 199.4 | c | 100.3 | c | 111.2 | c | 120.9 | c |
(a) | Adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share exclude exceptional items of such magnitude that their exclusion is necessary in order that adjusted earnings fulfil their purpose of reflecting the underlying performance of the Group. |
(b) | For the Rio Tinto Group, the daily average number of ordinary shares in issue of 1,378 million (2002: 1,377 million, 2001: 1,375 million) excludes the Rio Tinto Limited shares held by Rio Tinto plc. |
(c) | Diluted earnings per share figures for the Rio Tinto Group are 0.2 US cents (2002: 0.1 US cents, 2001: 0.2 US cents) lower than the earnings per share figures above. The daily average number of ordinary shares used for the calculation is 1,379 million (2002: 1,379 million, 2001: 1,377 million) and excludes the Rio Tinto Limited shares held by Rio Tinto plc. The extra one million shares included in the calculation relate to unexercised share options. |
10 | Goodwill | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | |||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
Cost | |||||||||||||
At 1 January | 463 | 465 | 819 | 733 | 1,282 | 1,198 | |||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | 261 | 78 | 260 | 76 | |||||
Additions (note 35) | 20 | - | - | 8 | 20 | 8 | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||
At 31 December | 482 | 463 | 1,080 | 819 | 1,562 | 1,282 | |||||||
Accumulated amortisation | |||||||||||||
At 1 January | (191 | ) | (142 | ) | (76 | ) | (34 | ) | (267 | ) | (176 | ) | |
Adjustment on currency translation | - | 3 | (30 | ) | (4 | ) | (30 | ) | (1 | ) | |||
Amortisation for the year | (34 | ) | (52 | ) | (42 | ) | (38 | ) | (76 | ) | (90 | ) | |
Other movements | (4 | ) | - | - | - | (4 | ) | - | |||||
At 31 December | (229 | ) | (191 | ) | (148 | ) | (76 | ) | (377 | ) | (267 | ) | |
Net balance sheet amount | 253 | 272 | 932 | 743 | 1,185 | 1,015 | |||||||
(a) | Goodwill is being amortised over the economic lives of the relevant business units, which involves periods ranging from four to 40 years with a weighted average of around 26 years. |
A-17
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
11 Exploration and evaluation | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc
- part of Rio Tinto Group |
Rio Tinto Limited
- part of Rio Tinto Group |
Rio Tinto Group |
||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
At cost less amounts written off | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 355 | 338 | 339 | 340 | 694 | 678 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 1 | (9 | ) | 118 | 34 | 119 | 25 | |||||
Expenditure in year | 88 | 89 | 42 | 35 | 130 | 124 | ||||||
Charged against profit for the year | (48 | ) | (47 | ) | 1 | (3 | ) | (47 | ) | (50 | ) | |
Disposals, transfers and other movements | (24 | ) | (16 | ) | (38 | ) | (67 | ) | (62 | ) | (83 | ) |
At 31 December | 372 | 355 | 462 | 339 | 834 | 694 | ||||||
Provision | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | (350 | ) | (331 | ) | (287 | ) | (292 | ) | (637 | ) | (623 | ) |
Adjustment on currency translation | - | 9 | (104 | ) | (31 | ) | (104 | ) | (22 | ) | ||
Charged against profit for the year | (42 | ) | (47 | ) | (38 | ) | (33 | ) | (80 | ) | (80 | ) |
Disposals, transfers and other movements | 22 | 19 | 34 | 69 | 56 | 88 | ||||||
At 31 December | (370 | ) | (350 | ) | (395 | ) | (287 | ) | (765 | ) | (637 | ) |
Net balance sheet amount | 2 | 5 | 67 | 52 | 69 | 57 | ||||||
(a) | The total of US$127 million (2002: US$130 million) charged against profit in respect of exploration and evaluation includes US$47 million (2002: US$50 million) written off cost and an increase in the provision of US$80 million (2002: US$80 million). |
12 Property, plant and equipment | ||||||||||||
Mining properties and leases |
Land and buildings |
Plant and equipment |
Capital works in progress |
2003 Total |
2002 Total |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | |||||||||||
Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||
Cost | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 4,002 | 2,867 | 14,567 | 1,891 | 23,327 | 20,777 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 947 | 438 | 2,480 | 408 | 4,273 | 1,261 | ||||||
Capitalisation of additional closure costs (note 20) | 167 | - | - | - | 167 | 55 | ||||||
Other additions | 124 | 66 | 404 | 868 | 1,462 | 1,617 | ||||||
Disposals | (48 | ) | (130 | ) | (271 | ) | - | (449 | ) | (548 | ) | |
Subsidiaries acquired/newly consolidated | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 120 | ||||||
Subsidiaries sold | (84 | ) | (10 | ) | (77 | ) | (14 | ) | (185 | ) | - | |
Transfers and other movements | 284 | 292 | 836 | (1,414 | ) | (2 | ) | 45 | ||||
At 31 December | 5,392 | 3,523 | 17,942 | 1,739 | 28,596 | 23,327 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | (1,076 | ) | (1,297 | ) | (8,636 | ) | (135 | ) | (11,144 | ) | (9,265 | ) |
Adjustment on currency translation | (272 | ) | (210 | ) | (1,404 | ) | - | (1,886 | ) | (573 | ) | |
Depreciation for the year | (192 | ) | (110 | ) | (628 | ) | - | (930 | ) | (864 | ) | |
Exceptional charges | - | - | - | - | - | (939 | ) | |||||
Disposals | 47 | 123 | 249 | - | 419 | 522 | ||||||
Subsidiaries acquired/newly consolidated | - | - | - | - | - | (34 | ) | |||||
Subsidiaries sold | 67 | 7 | 74 | - | 148 | - | ||||||
Transfers and other movements | 17 | (53 | ) | 28 | 1 | (7 | ) | 9 | ||||
At 31 December | (1,409 | ) | (1,540 | ) | (10,317 | ) | (134 | ) | (13,400 | ) | (11,144 | ) |
Net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2003 | 3,983 | 1,983 | 7,625 | 1,605 | 15,196 | |||||||
Net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2002 | 2,926 | 1,570 | 5,931 | 1,756 | 12,183 | |||||||
A-18
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
12 Property, plant and equipment (continued) | |
(a) | The net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2003 includes US$243 million (2002: US$198 million) of pledged assets, in addition to assets held under the finance leases disclosed in note 22. |
(b) | Transfers and other movements includes reclassifications between categories. |
(c) | Accumulated depreciation on 'Capital works in progress' at 1 January 2003 related to the exceptional charge made in 2002. |
(d) | Interest is capitalised at a rate based on the Group's cost of borrowing or at the rate on project specific debt where applicable. |
(e) | During 2002, the Group acquired North Jacob's Ranch for US$380 million. Payments of US$76 million were made in each of 2002 and 2003. The remainder of the consideration, US$228 million, is payable over the next three years. |
(f) | At 31 December 2003, net tangible assets per share amounted to US$6.38 (31 December 2002: US$4.64). |
Mining properties and leases |
Land and buildings |
Plant and equipment |
Capital works in progress |
2003 Total |
2002 Total |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Rio Tinto plc - part of Rio Tinto Group | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
Cost | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 1,323 | 1,655 | 6,470 | 1,070 | 10,518 | 9,792 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 78 | 46 | 291 | 128 | 543 | 152 | ||||||
Capitalisation of additional closure costs (note 20) | 67 | - | - | - | 67 | 24 | ||||||
Other additions | 93 | 48 | 234 | 110 | 485 | 964 | ||||||
Disposals | (47 | ) | (114 | ) | (160 | ) | - | (321 | ) | (433 | ) | |
Subsidiaries acquired/newly consolidated | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | ||||||
Transfers and other movements | 277 | 220 | 643 | (1,148 | ) | (8 | ) | 19 | ||||
At 31 December | 1,791 | 1,855 | 7,481 | 160 | 11,287 | 10,518 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | (341 | ) | (711 | ) | (3,903 | ) | - | (4,955 | ) | (4,469 | ) | |
Adjustment on currency translation | (16 | ) | (15 | ) | (152 | ) | - | (183 | ) | (21 | ) | |
Depreciation for the year | (47 | ) | (50 | ) | (254 | ) | - | (351 | ) | (371 | ) | |
Exceptional charges | - | - | - | - | - | (506 | ) | |||||
Disposals | 44 | 112 | 149 | - | 305 | 422 | ||||||
Transfers and other movements | 15 | (21 | ) | (2 | ) | - | (8 | ) | (10 | ) | ||
At 31 December | (345 | ) | (685 | ) | (4,162 | ) | - | (5,192 | ) | (4,955 | ) | |
Net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2003 | 1,446 | 1,170 | 3,319 | 160 | 6,095 | |||||||
Net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2002 | 982 | 944 | 2,567 | 1,070 | 5,563 | |||||||
(a) | The net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2003 includes US$25 million (2002: US$24 million) of pledged assets, in addition to assets held under the finance leases disclosed in note 22. |
Mining properties and leases |
Land and buildings |
Plant and equipment |
Capital works in progress |
2003 Total |
2002 Total |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Rio Tinto Limited - part of Rio Tinto Group | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
Cost | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 2,679 | 1,212 | 8,091 | 821 | 12,803 | 10,985 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 869 | 392 | 2,189 | 280 | 3,730 | 1,109 | ||||||
Capitalisation of additional closure costs (note 20) | 100 | - | - | - | 100 | 31 | ||||||
Other additions | 31 | 18 | 170 | 758 | 977 | 653 | ||||||
Disposals | (1 | ) | (16 | ) | (111 | ) | - | (128 | ) | (115 | ) | |
Subsidiaries acquired/newly consolidated | - | - | - | - | - | 120 | ||||||
Subsidiaries sold | (84 | ) | (10 | ) | (77 | ) | (14 | ) | (185 | ) | (6 | ) |
Transfers and other movements | 7 | 72 | 193 | (266 | ) | 6 | 26 | |||||
At 31 December | 3,601 | 1,668 | 10,455 | 1,579 | 17,303 | 12,803 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | (735 | ) | (586 | ) | (4,733 | ) | (135 | ) | (6,189 | ) | (4,796 | ) |
Adjustment on currency translation | (256 | ) | (195 | ) | (1,252 | ) | - | (1,703 | ) | (552 | ) | |
Depreciation for the year | (145 | ) | (60 | ) | (374 | ) | - | (579 | ) | (493 | ) | |
Exceptional charges | - | - | - | - | - | (433 | ) | |||||
Disposals | 3 | 11 | 100 | - | 114 | 100 | ||||||
Subsidiaries acquired/newly consolidated | - | - | - | - | - | (34 | ) | |||||
Subsidiaries sold | 67 | 7 | 74 | - | 148 | - | ||||||
Transfers and other movements | 2 | (32 | ) | 30 | 1 | 1 | 19 | |||||
At 31 December | (1,064 | ) | (855 | ) | (6,155 | ) | (134 | ) | (8,208 | ) | (6,189 | ) |
Net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2003 | 2,537 | 813 | 4,300 | 1,445 | 9,095 | |||||||
Net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2002 | 1,944 | 626 | 3,358 | 686 | 6,614 | |||||||
(a) | The net balance sheet amount at 31 December 2003 includes US$218 million (2002: US$174 million) of pledged assets in addition to assets held under the finance leases disclosed in note 22. |
A-19
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
12 Property, plant and equipment (continued) | ||||||
Rio Tinto plc - part of Rio Tinto Group |
Rio Tinto Limited - part of Rio Tinto Group |
Rio Tinto Group |
||||
|
|
|
||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||
The 2003 net balance sheet amounts for land and buildings include: | ||||||
Freehold | 1,161 | 760 | 1,921 | |||
Long leasehold | 6 | 49 | 55 | |||
Short leasehold | 3 | 4 | 7 | |||
|
|
|
||||
1,170 | 813 | 1,983 | ||||
|
|
|
||||
Deferred stripping | ||||||
Deferred stripping costs which are included in 'Mining properties and leases' and 'Investments in Joint Ventures and Associates' (note 13), are analysed below: | ||||||
Rio Tinto Group | ||||||
|
||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||
|
|
|
||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||
At 1 January | ||||||
Subsidiaries | 326 | 292 | 200 | |||
Equity accounted operations | 198 | 175 | 154 | |||
524 | 467 | 354 | ||||
Adjustment on currency translation | ||||||
Subsidiaries | 17 | - | - | |||
Equity accounted operations | 3 | - | - | |||
20 | - | - | ||||
Net deferral of stripping costs during the year | ||||||
Subsidiaries | 77 | 29 | 86 | |||
Equity accounted operations | 32 | 27 | 33 | |||
109 | 56 | 119 | ||||
Other | ||||||
Subsidiaries | 21 | 5 | 6 | |||
Equity accounted operations | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (12 | ) |
18 | 1 | (6 | ) | |||
Deferred stripping balance carried forward at 31 December | ||||||
Subsidiaries | 441 | 326 | 292 | |||
Equity accounted operations | 230 | 198 | 175 | |||
671 | 524 | 467 | ||||
Rio
Tinto plc - part of Rio Tinto Group |
Rio
Tinto Limited - part of Rio Tinto Group |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
At 1 January | ||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | 260 | 242 | 175 | 66 | 50 | 25 | ||||||
Equity accounted operations | 218 | 191 | 162 | 8 | 4 | 2 | ||||||
478 | 433 | 337 | 74 | 54 | 27 | |||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | ||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | 2 | - | - | 15 | - | - | ||||||
Equity accounted operations | 7 | - | - | 3 | - | - | ||||||
9 | - | - | 18 | - | - | |||||||
Net deferral of stripping costs during the year | ||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | 66 | 13 | 61 | 11 | 16 | 25 | ||||||
Equity accounted operations | 29 | 31 | 41 | 12 | 4 | 2 | ||||||
95 | 44 | 102 | 23 | 20 | 27 | |||||||
Other | ||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | 27 | 5 | 6 | (6 | ) | - | - | |||||
Equity accounted operations | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (12 | ) | (3 | ) | - | - | ||
24 | 1 | (6 | ) | (9 | ) | - | - | |||||
Deferred stripping balance carried forward at | ||||||||||||
31 December | ||||||||||||
Subsidiaries | 355 | 260 | 242 | 86 | 66 | 50 | ||||||
Equity accounted operations | 251 | 218 | 191 | 20 | 8 | 4 | ||||||
606 | 478 | 433 | 106 | 74 | 54 | |||||||
A-20
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
13 | Fixed asset investments |
Investments in joint ventures |
Loans to joint ventures |
Investments in associates/ other |
Loans to associates |
2003 Total |
2002 Total |
|||||||
US$m | US$m | |||||||||||
Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 1,744 | 177 | 580 | 76 | 2,577 | 2,290 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 255 | 5 | 23 | - | 283 | 83 | ||||||
Groups share of earnings net of distributions
(excl.exceptional charges) |
15 | - | (3 | ) | - | 12 | 21 | |||||
Exceptional charges | - | - | - | - | - | (39 | ) | |||||
Additions (excluding acquisitions) | 122 | - | 13 | - | 135 | 184 | ||||||
Acquisitions (note 35) | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | ||||||
Disposals and repayments of advances | (78 | ) | (10 | ) | (93 | ) | (73 | ) | (254 | ) | (17 | ) |
Transfers and other movements | (7 | ) | - | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | (13 | ) | 47 | ||
At 31 December | 2,051 | 172 | 515 | 2 | 2,740 | 2,577 | ||||||
Investments in joint ventures |
Loans to joint ventures |
Investments in associates/ other |
Loans to associates |
2003 Total |
2002 Total |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
US$m | US$m | |||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - part of Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 881 | 161 | 1,407 | 86 | 2,535 | 2,282 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | - | - | 546 | - | 546 | 153 | ||||||
Groups share of earnings net of distributions (excl. exceptional charges) |
52 | - | 141 | - | 193 | 209 | ||||||
Exceptional charges | - | - | - | - | - | (124 | ) | |||||
Additions (excluding acquisitions) | 33 | - | 807 | 12 | 852 | 69 | ||||||
Acquisitions (note 35) | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | ||||||
Disposals and repayments of advances | - | (10 | ) | (308 | ) | - | (318 | ) | (59 | ) | ||
Transfers and other movements | (3 | ) | - | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | (14 | ) | (6 | ) | |
At 31 December | 963 | 151 | 2,589 | 91 | 3,794 | 2,535 | ||||||
Investments in joint ventures |
Loans to joint ventures |
Investments in associates/ other |
Loans to associates |
2003 Total |
2002 Total |
|||||||
|
||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | |||||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited - part of Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 863 | 16 | 126 | 67 | 1,072 | 824 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 255 | 5 | 8 | (1 | ) | 267 | 74 | |||||
Groups share of earnings net of distributions | (37 | ) | - | 8 | - | (29 | ) | 5 | ||||
Additions (excluding acquisitions) | 89 | - | - | - | 89 | 113 | ||||||
Acquisitions (note 35) | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | ||||||
Disposals and repayments of advances | (78 | ) | - | (89 | ) | (66 | ) | (233 | ) | (7 | ) | |
Transfers and other movements | (4 | ) | - | 9 | - | 5 | 55 | |||||
|
||||||||||||
At 31 December | 1,088 | 21 | 62 | - | 1,171 | 1,072 | ||||||
(a) | The Groups investments in joint ventures and associates include, where appropriate, entry premiums on acquisition plus interest capitalised by the Group during the development period of the relevant mines. At 31 December 2003, this capitalised interest less accumulated amortisation amounted to US$12 million (2002: US$13 million). |
(b) | In 2002, 'Transfers and other movements' included US$55 million in relation to the revision to fair values relating to assets held for resale. |
(c) | The cash flow statement analyses additions
to joint ventures and associates between the following:- |
(d) | Investments in and loans to associates by the Rio Tinto plc part of the Group include amounts relating to Rio Tinto Limited which are eliminated in arriving at the Rio Tinto Group figures. |
(e) | Further details of investments in joint ventures and associates are set out on page A-22 and in notes 14, 32 and 33. |
A-21 |
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
13 | Fixed asset investments (continued) |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Joint Ventures | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto's share of assets | ||||||||||||
Fixed assets | 1,573 | 1,640 | 1,195 | 1,118 | 2,768 | 2,758 | ||||||
Current assets | 272 | 117 | 193 | 234 | 465 | 351 | ||||||
1,845 | 1,757 | 1,388 | 1,352 | 3,233 | 3,109 | |||||||
Rio Tinto's share of third party liabilities | ||||||||||||
Liabilities due within one year | (200 | ) | (124 | ) | (112 | ) | (171 | ) | (312 | ) | (295 | ) |
Liabilities due after more than one year (including provisions) | (531 | ) | (591 | ) | (167 | ) | (302 | ) | (698 | ) | (893 | ) |
(731 | ) | (715 | ) | (279 | ) | (473 | ) | (1,010 | ) | (1,188 | ) | |
Rio Tinto's share of net assets | 1,114 | 1,042 | 1,109 | 879 | 2,223 | 1,921 | ||||||
(a) | The Group's share of joint venture liabilities set out above excludes US $172 million (2002: US$177 million) due to the Group. These excluded liabilities correspond with the loans to joint ventures that are presented earlier in this note as an asset of the Group. Including these loans, the Group's share of the total liabilities of joint ventures was US$1,182 million (2002: US$1,365 million). |
(b) | Of the US$ 698 million of liabilities due after more than one year, US$436 million relates to long term debt, which matures as follows: US$ 120 million between one to two years; US$92 million between two to three years; US$97 million between three to four years; US$111 million between four to five years and US$16 million after five years. |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Associates | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto's share of assets | ||||||||||||
Fixed assets | 5,132 | 4,352 | 182 | 349 | 1,083 | 1,512 | ||||||
Current assets/(liabilities) | 1,197 | 944 | (15 | ) | 66 | 327 | 297 | |||||
6,329 | 5,296 | 167 | 415 | 1,410 | 1,809 | |||||||
Rio Tinto's share of third party liabilities | ||||||||||||
Liabilities due within one year | (1,423 | ) | (1,607 | ) | (20 | ) | (78 | ) | (214 | ) | (345 | ) |
Liabilities due after more than one year (including provisions) | (2,300 | ) | (1,961 | ) | (104 | ) | (162 | ) | (733 | ) | (789 | ) |
(3,723 | ) | (3,568 | ) | (124 | ) | (240 | ) | (947 | ) | (1,134 | ) | |
Non equity capital and outside shareholders' interests | (515 | ) | (314 | ) | - | - | (42 | ) | (105 | ) | ||
Rio Tinto's share of net assets | 2,091 | 1,414 | 43 | 175 | 421 | 570 | ||||||
(a) | The Group's share of associate liabilities set out above excludes US$2 million (2002: US$76 million) due to the Group. These excluded liabilities correspond with the loans to associates that are presented earlier in this note as an asset of the Group. Including these loans, the Group's share of the total liabilities of associates was US$949 million (2002: US$ 1,210 million). |
(b) | Of the US$ 733 million of liabilities due after more than one year, US$563 million relates to long term debt, which matures as follows: US$44 million between one to two years; US$233 million between two to three years; US$38 million between three to four years; US$32 million between four to five years and US$216 million after 5 years. |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Investments in and loans to associates/other | ||||||||||||
Investments in and loans to associates | 2,091 | 1,414 | 43 | 175 | 421 | 570 | ||||||
Other investments | 589 | 79 | 19 | 18 | 96 | 86 | ||||||
2,680 | 1,493 | 62 | 193 | 517 | 656 | |||||||
(a) | Other investments include listed investments with a market value of US$92 million (2002: US$70 million). The Group owns 20.3 per cent of the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Income Fund which itself owns 15.1 per cent of Iron Ore Company of Canada Inc. This investment is not equity accounted because the Group has no involvement in its management. |
(b) | Further information on the net debt of joint ventures and associates is shown in note 14. |
A-22 |
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
14 | Net debt of joint ventures and associates |
Rio Tinto | Rio Tinto | |||||||
Rio Tinto | share of | Rio Tinto | share of | |||||
interest | net debt | interest | net debt | |||||
2003 | 2003 | 2002 | 2002 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
% | US$m | % | US$m | |||||
Joint ventures | ||||||||
Minera Escondida Limitada | 30.0 | 414 | 30.0 | 464 | ||||
PT Kaltim Prima Coal | - | - | 50.0 | 79 | ||||
Leichhardt | 44.7 | 31 | 44.7 | 40 | ||||
Colowyo | 20.0 | 32 | 20.0 | 35 | ||||
Warkworth | 42.1 | 34 | 42.1 | 26 | ||||
Associates | ||||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. | 13.1 | 236 | 16.5 | 405 | ||||
Minera Alumbrera Limited | - | - | 25.0 | 47 | ||||
Tisand (Pty) Limited | 50.0 | 121 | 50.0 | 62 | ||||
Port Waratah Coal Services | 27.6 | 114 | 27.6 | 103 | ||||
Sociedade Mineira de Neves-Corvo SA (Somincor) | 49.0 | 37 | 49.0 | 28 | ||||
Other | (15 | ) | 20 | |||||
1,004 | 1,309 | |||||||
(a) | In accordance with FRS 9, the Group includes its net investment in joint ventures and associates in its consolidated balance sheet. This investment is shown net of the Group's share of the net debt of joint ventures and associates due to third parties, which is set out above. |
(b) | Some of the debt of joint ventures and associates is subject to financial and general covenants. |
(c) | The Group has a partnership interest in the Colowyo Coal Company and has undertaken, via a subsidiary company which entered into a management agreement, to cause the partnership to perform its obligations under certain coal supply contracts. The debt of US$163 million owed by the Colowyo Coal Company is to be serviced and repaid out of the proceeds of these contracts. |
(d) | The Group holds 44.7 per cent of the equity of the Leichhardt joint venture, which has a 31.4 per cent interest in the Blair Athol joint venture. Leichhardt has US$85 million of shareholders' funds and US$70 million of debt finance. |
(e) | The debt of joint ventures and associates is without recourse to the Rio Tinto Group except that Rio Tinto plc has guaranteed US$6 million of its share of Somincor's debt. |
15 Inventories | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited- | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Raw material and purchased components | 205 | 179 | 142 | 168 | 347 | 347 | ||||||
Consumable stores | 124 | 108 | 166 | 140 | 290 | 248 | ||||||
Work in progress | 219 | 148 | 163 | 97 | 382 | 245 | ||||||
Finished goods and goods for resale | 420 | 379 | 344 | 283 | 764 | 662 | ||||||
968 | 814 | 815 | 688 | 1,783 | 1,502 | |||||||
Comprising: | ||||||||||||
Inventories expected to be sold or used within 12 months | 968 | 814 | 778 | 649 | 1,746 | 1,463 | ||||||
Inventories expected to be neither sold nor used within 12 months | - | - | 37 | 39 | 37 | 39 | ||||||
968 | 814 | 815 | 688 | 1,783 | 1,502 | |||||||
(a) | As reported in the cashflow statement, the increase in inventories during 2003 was US$43 million excluding the effect of exchange rates on translation into US dollars. |
A-23 |
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
16 | Accounts receivable and prepayments |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Falling due within one year | ||||||||||||
Trade debtors | 569 | 589 | 740 | 603 | 1,309 | 1,192 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful debts | (33 | ) | (6 | ) | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | (43 | ) | (16 | ) |
Bills receivable | 3 | 6 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 17 | ||||||
Amounts owed by joint ventures | - | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | ||||||
Amounts owed by associates | 811 | 577 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 17 | ||||||
Other debtors | 99 | 66 | 268 | 242 | 225 | 181 | ||||||
Current tax recoverable | 93 | 43 | 9 | 9 | 102 | 52 | ||||||
Pension prepayments | - | 36 | 5 | 47 | 5 | 83 | ||||||
Other prepayments | 12 | 24 | 47 | 43 | 59 | 67 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
1,554 | 1,335 | 1,070 | 957 | 1,674 | 1,598 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Falling due after more than one year | ||||||||||||
Pension prepayments | 530 | 521 | 85 | 30 | 615 | 551 | ||||||
Other debtors | 1 | 8 | 35 | 28 | 36 | 36 | ||||||
Current tax recoverable | - | 5 | 130 | 5 | 130 | 10 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | 22 | 2 | (5 | ) | 42 | 17 | 44 | |||||
Bills receivable | 2 | - | 4 | - | 6 | - | ||||||
Other prepayments | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | - | ||||||
Amounts due from Rio Tinto Limited | - | 1,066 | - | - | - | - | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
555 | 1,602 | 254 | 105 | 809 | 641 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(a) | Amounts owed to Rio Tinto plc by associates includes US$563 million (2002: US$441 million) relating to a loan to Rio Tinto Limited and US$245 million (2002: US$1,192 million) relating to other balances between the two parts of the Group. In addition, a loan of US$89 million (2002: US$77 million) to Rio Tinto Limited is included within investments in associates (note 13). |
(b) | Other debtors for Rio Tinto Limited include US$142 million (2002: US$127 million) due from Rio Tinto plc. |
(c) | Movements on pension prepayments are included in Other items in the cash flow. |
17 | Current asset investments, cash and liquid resources |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Liquid resources | ||||||||||||
Time deposits | 147 | 32 | 59 | 53 | 206 | 85 | ||||||
Other | 2 | 2 | - | - | 2 | 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total liquid resources | 149 | 34 | 59 | 53 | 208 | 87 | ||||||
Deduct: investments qualifying as cash | (147 | ) | (32 | ) | (59 | ) | (53 | ) | (206 | ) | (85 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
2 | 2 | - | - | 2 | 2 | |||||||
Other current asset investments | ||||||||||||
US Treasury bonds (a) | 228 | 304 | - | - | 228 | 304 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Investments per balance sheet (unlisted) | 230 | 306 | - | - | 230 | 306 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Cash | ||||||||||||
Cash as defined in FRS1 Revised ('FRS1 cash') | 36 | 70 | 5 | 9 | 41 | 79 | ||||||
Investments qualifying as cash | 147 | 32 | 59 | 53 | 206 | 85 | ||||||
Add back Bank borrowings repayable on demand included in FRS 1 cash | 74 | 72 | 74 | 89 | 148 | 161 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Cash per balance sheet | 257 | 174 | 138 | 151 | 395 | 325 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
(a) | Current asset investments of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Group include US$228 million relating to US treasury bonds that are not regarded as liquid assets because they are held as security for the deferred consideration on certain assets acquired during 2002. |
(b) | Information on cash and cash equivalents under US GAAP is given in note 42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles. |
A-24
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
18 | Short term borrowings |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Secured | ||||||||||||
Bank loans repayable within 12 months | 36 | 2 | 16 | 14 | 52 | 16 | ||||||
Other loans repayable within 12 months | 21 | 20 | 38 | 70 | 59 | 90 | ||||||
57 | 22 | 54 | 84 | 111 | 106 | |||||||
Unsecured | ||||||||||||
Bank borrowings repayable on demand | 74 | 72 | 74 | 89 | 148 | 161 | ||||||
Bank loans repayable within 12 months | 91 | - | - | 62 | 91 | 62 | ||||||
Other loans repayable within 12 months | 44 | 566 | 113 | 722 | 157 | 1,288 | ||||||
Commercial paper | 276 | 699 | 1,411 | 1,050 | 1,687 | 1,749 | ||||||
485 | 1,337 | 1,598 | 1,923 | 2,083 | 3,260 | |||||||
Total short term borrowings per balance sheet | 542 | 1,359 | 1,652 | 2,007 | 2,194 | 3,366 | ||||||
(a) | In accordance with FRS 4, all commercial paper is classified as short term borrowings although US$1,100 million outstanding at 31 December 2003 is backed by medium term facilities (2002: commercial paper of US$1,749 million was backed by medium term facilities). Under US and Australian GAAP, the US$1,100 million would be grouped within non-current borrowings at 31 December 2003. Further details of available facilities are given in note 28. |
19 | Accounts payable and accruals |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Due within one year | ||||||||||||
Trade creditors | 365 | 258 | 372 | 326 | 737 | 584 | ||||||
Amounts owed to joint ventures | 3 | - | 6 | - | 9 | - | ||||||
Amounts owed to associates (c) | 185 | 149 | 1 | 1 | 44 | 23 | ||||||
Other creditors (a), (b) | 141 | 151 | 918 | 638 | 226 | 202 | ||||||
Tax on profits | 40 | 63 | 210 | 308 | 250 | 371 | ||||||
Employee entitlements | 83 | 88 | 42 | 33 | 125 | 121 | ||||||
Royalties and mining taxes | 82 | 83 | 51 | 47 | 133 | 130 | ||||||
Accruals and deferred income | 59 | 68 | 64 | 41 | 123 | 109 | ||||||
Dividends payable to outside shareholders of | ||||||||||||
subsidiaries | - | - | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
Dividends payable to Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto | ||||||||||||
Limited shareholders | 367 | 329 | 189 | 158 | 492 | 430 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
1,325 | 1,189 | 1,854 | 1,556 | 2,140 | 1,974 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Due in more than one year | ||||||||||||
Other creditors (a), (b) | 143 | 229 | 51 | 1,113 | 194 | 276 | ||||||
Accruals and deferred income | - | 6 | 29 | 22 | 29 | 28 | ||||||
Tax on profits | 13 | - | 86 | - | 99 | - | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
156 | 235 | 166 | 1,135 | 322 | 304 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(a) | Other creditors for the Rio Tinto Group include deferred consideration of US$219 million (2002: US$287 million) relating to certain assets acquired during 2002. The deferred consideration is included at its net present value. The amortisation of the discount applied in establishing the net present value is treated as a finance cost. All of the deferred consideration relates to Rio Tinto plc. Other creditors for Rio Tinto Limited includes US$652 million (2002: US$518 million) relating to loans from Rio Tinto plc. |
(b) | Other creditors for Rio Tinto Limited include US$833 million (2002: US$587 million) due to Rio Tinto plc. Dividends payable by Rio Tinto Limited include US$64 million (2002: US$57 million) due to Rio Tinto plc. In 2002 US$1,066 million of Rio Tinto Limited's creditors due in more than one year represented amounts owed to Rio Tinto plc for shares bought back during 2000. |
(c) | For Rio Tinto plc US$142 million (2002: US$127 million) of amounts owed to associates relate to balances with Rio Tinto Limited. |
A-25
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
20 | Provisions for liabilities and charges |
Post | Other | Close down & | ||||||||||
retirement | employee | restoration/ | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
health care | entitlements | environmental | Other | Total | Total | |||||||
Rio Tinto Group | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
At 1 January | 466 | 240 | 1,662 | 194 | 2,562 | 2,279 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 20 | 56 | 219 | 40 | 335 | 100 | ||||||
Capitalisation of additional closure costs (note 12) | - | - | 167 | - | 167 | 55 | ||||||
Charged to profit for the year | 34 | 71 | 18 | 31 | 154 | 58 | ||||||
Exceptional charge | - | - | - | - | - |
116 | ||||||
Amortisation of discount related to provisions | - | - | 89 | - | 89 | 52 | ||||||
Utilised in year: | ||||||||||||
provisions set up on acquisition of businesses | - | - | - | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (6 | ) | |||
other provisions | (22 | ) | (44 | ) | (48 | ) | (41 | ) | (155 | ) | (112 | ) |
Subsidiaries acquired (note 35) | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | ||||||
Subsidiaries sold | - | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | (7 | ) | - | ||
Transfers and other movements | - | 15 | (10 | ) | (8 | ) | (3 | ) | 15 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
498 | 337 | 2,092 | 211 | 3,138 | 2,562 | |||||||
Provision for deferred taxation (note 21) | 1,398 | 1,050 | ||||||||||
Provisions for liabilities and charges per balance sheet | 4,536 | 3,612 | ||||||||||
Post | Other | Close down & | ||||||||||
retirement | employee | restoration/ | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
health care | entitlements | environmental | Other | Total | Total | |||||||
Rio Tinto plc - part of Rio Tinto Group | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
At 1 January | 425 | 64 | 1,084 | 48 | 1,621 | 1,432 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 10 | 6 | 42 | 1 | 59 | 12 | ||||||
Capitalisation of additional closure costs (note 12) | 67 | 67 | 24 | |||||||||
Charged/(released) to profit for the year | 29 | 16 | 1 | 14 | 60 | 33 | ||||||
Exceptional charges | - | - | - | - | - | 116 | ||||||
Amortisation of discount related to provisions | - | - | 55 | - | 55 | 30 | ||||||
Utilised in year: | ||||||||||||
provisions set up on acquisition of businesses | - | - | - | - | - | (1 | ) | |||||
other provisions | (20 | ) | (5 | ) | (25 | ) | (12 | ) | (62 | ) | (34 | ) |
Transfers and other movements | - | 3 | (9 | ) | 9 | 3 | 9 | |||||
444 | 84 | 1,215 | 60 | 1,803 | 1,621 | |||||||
Provision for deferred taxation (note 21) | 740 | 640 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Provisions for liabilities and charges per balance sheet | 2,543 | 2,261 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Post | Other | Close down & | ||||||||||
retirement | employee | restoration/ | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
health care | entitlements | environmental | Other | Total | Total | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Rio Tinto Limited - part of Rio Tinto Group | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
At 1 January | 41 | 176 | 578 | 146 | 941 | 847 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 10 | 50 | 177 | 39 | 276 | 88 | ||||||
Capitalisation of additional closure costs (note 12) | - | - | 100 | - | 100 | 31 | ||||||
Charged/(released) to profit for the year | 5 | 55 | 17 | 17 | 94 | 25 | ||||||
Amortisation of discount related to provisions | - | - | 34 | - | 34 | 22 | ||||||
Utilised in year: | ||||||||||||
provisions set up on acquisition of businesses | - | - | - | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | |||
other provisions | (2 | ) | (39 | ) | (23 | ) | (29 | ) | (93 | ) | (78 | ) |
Subsidiaries acquired | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | ||||||
Subsidiaries sold | - | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | (7 | ) | - | ||
Transfers and other movements | - | 12 | (1 | ) | (17 | ) | (6 | ) | 6 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
54 | 253 | 877 | 151 | 1,335 | 941 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Provision for deferred taxation (note 21) | 658 | 410 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Provision for liabilities and charges per balance sheet | 1,993 | 1,351 | ||||||||||
|
|
A-26
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
20 | Provisions for liabilities and charges (continued) |
(a) | The main assumptions used to determine the provision for post retirement healthcare are disclosed in note 40. The current provision is expected to be utilised over the next 15 to 20 years. |
(b) | The provision for other employee entitlements includes pension entitlements of US$77 million and a provision for long service leave, based on the relevant entitlements in certain Group operations. Some US$116 million of the total provision for employee entitlements for the Rio Tinto Group, US$18 million for Rio Tinto plc, US$61 million for Rio Tinto Limited, is expected to be utilised within the next year. |
(c) | The Group's policy on close down and restoration costs is shown in note 1(l). Close down and restoration costs are a normal consequence of mining, and the majority of close down and restoration expenditure is incurred at the end of a mine's life. Remaining lives of mines range from two to over 50 years with an average, weighted by closure provision, of around 20 years. Although the ultimate cost to be incurred is uncertain, subsidiary companies have estimated their respective costs based on feasibility and engineering studies using current restoration standards and techniques. Provisions of US$2,092 million for close down and restoration costs and other environmental obligations include estimates of the effect of future inflation and have been discounted to their present value at six per cent per annum, being an estimate of the risk free pre tax cost of borrowing. Excluding the effects of future inflation, and before discounting, this is equivalent to some US$3.0 billion. |
(d) | Some US$126 million of environmental clean up expenditure is expected to take place within the next five years. The remainder includes amounts for the operation and maintenance of remediation facilities in later years. The provision for environmental expenditure includes the issue described in (e) below. |
(e) | In 1995, Kennecott Utah Copper ('KUC') agreed with the US Environmental Protection Agency ('EPA') and the State of Utah to complete certain source control projects and perform specific environmental studies regarding contamination of ground water in the vicinity of the Bingham Canyon mine. A remedial investigation and feasibility study on the South Zone ground water contamination, completed in March 1998, identified a range of alternative measures to address this issue. Additional studies were conducted to refine the workable alternatives. A remedial design document was completed in 2002. A joint proposal and related agreements were updated and provided to the Trustee in the third quarter of 2003. Some modifications of the original plan may be necessary in response to comments from the public. It is anticipated that formal agreement with the State of Utah Natural Resource Damage Trustee, the State of Utah and the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District will be complete in the first quarter of 2004. KUC also anticipates entering into a formal agreement with the EPA in 2004, for the remedial action on the ground water, including the acidic portion of the contamination. |
(f) | Other provisions deal with a variety of issues and include US$39 million relating to the remaining provision for the market valuation of the hedge books held by companies acquired in 2000 and 2001, which will be utilised over the next eight years (see note 28), and US$44 million relating to payments received from employees for accommodation at some sites which are refundable in certain circumstances. |
A-27
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
21 | Deferred taxation |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
At 1 January (as restated) | 638 | 573 | 368 | 342 | 1,006 | 915 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 52 | 46 | 145 | 33 | 197 | 79 | ||||||
Reported in the STRGL (b) | - | 1 | 162 | 12 | 162 | 13 | ||||||
Subsidiaries acquired/sold | - | (1 | ) | 6 | 1 | 6 | - | |||||
(Released)/charged to profit for the year | (19 | ) | 21 | (6 | ) | (37 | ) | (25 | ) | (16 | ) | |
Other movements (a) | 47 | (2 | ) | (12 | ) | 17 | 35 | 15 | ||||
718 | 638 | 663 | 368 | 1,381 | 1,006 | |||||||
Included in provisions for liabilities and charges | 740 | 640 | 658 | 410 | 1,398 | 1,050 | ||||||
Included in accounts receivable | (22 | ) | (2 | ) | 5 | (42 | ) | (17 | ) | (44 | ) | |
718 | 638 | 663 | 368 | 1,381 | 1,006 | |||||||
(a) | 'Other movements' include deferred tax recognised by subsidiary holding companies that is presented in these accounts as part of the tax charge on the profits of the joint ventures and associates to which it relates. |
(b) | The amounts reported in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses relate to the provisions for tax relief on exchange differences on net debt recorded directly in reserves. |
Other | ||||||||||
Rio Tinto Group | UK | Australian | countries' | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
tax | tax | tax | Total | Total | ||||||
Provided in the accounts | |
|
|
|
|
|||||
US$m | US$m | |||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 12 | 311 | 1,046 | 1,369 | 1,491 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities | (134 | ) | (988 | ) | (1,628 | ) | (2,750 | ) | (2,497 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance as shown above | (122 | ) | (677 | ) | (582 | ) | (1,381 | ) | (1,006 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Comprising: | ||||||||||
Accelerated capital allowances | (6 | ) | (630 | ) | (938 | ) | (1,574 | ) | (1,439 | ) |
Other timing differences | (130 | ) | (66 | ) | 107 | (89 | ) | 225 | ||
Tax losses | 14 | 19 | 249 | 282 | 208 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance as shown above | (122 | ) | (677 | ) | (582 | ) | (1,381 | ) | (1,006 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Rio Tinto plc - part of Rio Tinto Group | Other | |||||||||
UK | Australian | countries' | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||
tax | tax | tax | Total | Total | ||||||
Provided in the accounts | |
|
|
|
|
|||||
US$m | US$m | |||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 12 | 3 | 871 | 886 | 1,107 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities | (134 | ) | - | (1,470 | ) | (1,604 | ) | (1,745 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance as shown above | (122 | ) | 3 | (599 | ) | (718 | ) | (638 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Comprising: | ||||||||||
Accelerated capital allowances | (6 | ) | 3 | (890 | ) | (893 | ) | (917 | ) | |
Other timing differences | (130 | ) | - | 72 | (58 | ) | 89 | |||
Tax losses | 14 | - | 219 | 233 | 190 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance as shown above | (122 | ) | 3 | (599 | ) | (718 | ) | (638 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Rio Tinto Limited - part of Rio Tinto Group | Other | |||||||||
UK | Australian | countries' | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||
tax | tax | tax | Total | Total | ||||||
Provided in the accounts | |
|
|
|
|
|||||
US$m | US$m | |||||||||
Deferred tax assets | - | 308 | 175 | 483 | 384 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities | - | (988 | ) | (158 | ) | (1,146 | ) | (752 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance as shown above | - | (680 | ) | 17 | (663 | ) | (368 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Comprising: | ||||||||||
Accelerated capital allowances | - | (633 | ) | (48 | ) | (681 | ) | (522 | ) | |
Other timing differences | - | (66 | ) | 35 | (31 | ) | 136 | |||
Tax losses | - | 19 | 30 | 49 | 18 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance as shown above | - | (680 | ) | 17 | (663 | ) | (368 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
(c) | US$380 million (2002: US$430 million) of potential deferred tax assets have not been recognised as an asset in these accounts. There is no time limit for the recovery of these potential assets. This total includes US$306 million (2002: US$366 million) of US Alternative Minimum Tax credits and US tax losses for which recovery is dependent on the level of taxable profits in the US tax group and US$74 million (2002: US$64 million) of tax losses arising in countries other than the US. |
(d) | There is a limited time period for the recovery of US$26 million (2002: US$20 million) of tax losses which have been recognised as deferred tax assets in the accounts. |
A-28
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
22 | Medium and long term borrowings |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
At 1 January | 2,729 | 2,629 | 3,184 | 3,623 | 5,913 | 6,252 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 92 | 33 | 92 | 37 | 184 | 70 | ||||||
Loans drawn down | 602 | 1,012 | 1,215 | 560 | 1,817 | 1,572 | ||||||
Loan repayments | (1,396 | ) | (945 | ) | (623 | ) | (1,036 | ) | (2,019 | ) | (1,981 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
At 31 December | 2,027 | 2,729 | 3,868 | 3,184 | 5,895 | 5,913 | ||||||
Deduct: short term | (468 | ) | (1,287 | ) | (1,578 | ) | (1,918 | ) | (2,046 | ) | (3,205 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Medium and long term borrowings | 1,559 | 1,442 | 2,290 | 1,266 | 3,849 | 2,708 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Borrowings at 31 December | ||||||||||||
Commercial paper (b) | 276 | 699 | 1,411 | 1,050 | 1,687 | 1,749 | ||||||
Bank loans | ||||||||||||
Secured | 41 | 8 | 109 | 254 | 150 | 262 | ||||||
Unsecured | 173 | 82 | 262 | 121 | 435 | 203 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
214 | 90 | 371 | 375 | 585 | 465 | |||||||
Other loans | ||||||||||||
Secured | ||||||||||||
Loans | 12 | 22 | 35 | 68 | 47 | 90 | ||||||
Finance leases | 99 | 103 | 20 | 16 | 119 | 119 | ||||||
Unsecured | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Canada Inc 6% guaranteed bonds 2003 | - | 300 | - | - | - | 300 | ||||||
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited Bonds 5.75% 2006 | - | - | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | ||||||
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited Bonds 2.625% 2008 | - | - | 600 | - | 600 | - | ||||||
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited Bonds 6.5% 2003 | - | - | - | 200 | - | 200 | ||||||
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited Bonds 7.125% 2013 | - | - | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||
Eurobond 2007 (c) | 781 | 716 | - | - | 781 | 716 | ||||||
European Medium Term Notes (c) | 456 | 640 | 381 | 477 | 837 | 1,117 | ||||||
North Finance (Bermuda) Limited 7% 2005 | - | - | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | ||||||
Other unsecured loans | 189 | 159 | 250 | 198 | 439 | 357 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
1,537 | 1,940 | 2,086 | 1,759 | 3,623 | 3,699 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total | 2,027 | 2,729 | 3,868 | 3,184 | 5,895 | 5,913 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | The majority of the fixed rate borrowings shown above are swapped to floating rates. Details of interest rate and currency swaps and of available standby credit facilities are shown in note 28. |
(b) | In accordance with FRS 4, all commercial paper is classified as short term borrowings although US$1,100 million outstanding at 31 December 2003 is backed by medium term facilities (2002: US$1,749 million). Under US and Australian GAAP, the US$1,100 million would be grouped within non current borrowings at 31 December 2003. Further details of available facilities are given in note 28. |
(c) | The Group has a US$3 billion European programme for the issuance of short to medium term debt of which US$1.6 billion was drawn down at 31 December 2003. |
(d) | Intragroup borrowings between the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group are included in accounts payable. |
(e) | Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited is a 100 per cent owned finance subsidiary of Rio Tinto Limited. Rio Tinto Limited and Rio Tinto plc have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the securities issued by Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Limited. |
A-29
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO
LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
(continued)
23 Net debt | ||||||||||
Analysis
of changes in consolidated net debt: Rio Tinto Group |
FRS 1 | Liquid | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||
cash (a) | Borrowings | resources (a) | Net debt | Net debt | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||
At 1 January | 79 | (5,913 | ) | 87 | (5,747 | ) | (5,711 | ) | ||
Adjustment on currency translation | 45 | (184 | ) | 16 | (123 | ) | (102 | ) | ||
Per cash flow statement | (83 | ) | 202 | 105 | 224 | 66 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
At 31 December | 41 | (5,895 | ) | 208 | (5,646 | ) | (5,747 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
FRS 1 | Liquid | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
cash (a) | Borrowings | resources (a) | Net debt | Net debt | ||||||
Rio Tinto plc - part of Rio Tinto Group | |
|
|
|
||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||
At 1 January | 70 | (2,729 | ) | 34 | (2,625 | ) | (2,311 | ) | ||
Adjustment on currency translation | (25 | ) | (92 | ) | 5 | (112 | ) | (89 | ) | |
Per cash flow statement | (9 | ) | 794 | 110 | 895 | (225 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
At 31 December | 36 | (2,027 | ) | 149 | (1,842 | ) | (2,625 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
FRS 1 | Liquid | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
cash (a) | Borrowings | resources (a) | Net debt | Net debt | ||||||
Rio Tinto Limited - part of Rio Tinto Group | |
|
|
|
||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||
At 1 January | 9 | (3,184 | ) | 53 | (3,122 | ) | (3,400 | ) | ||
Adjustment on currency translation | 70 | (92 | ) | 11 | (11 | ) | (13 | ) | ||
Per cash flow statement | (74 | ) | (592 | ) | (5 | ) | (671 | ) | 291 | |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
At 31 December | 5 | (3,868 | ) | 59 | (3,804 | ) | (3,122 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(a) | A reconciliation of these figures to their respective balance sheet categories is shown in note 17. |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Reconciliation of cash flow to movement in net debt | ||||||||||||
Decrease in cash per cash flow | (9 | ) | (16 | ) | (74 | ) | (114 | ) | (83 | ) | (130 | ) |
Decrease/(increase) in borrowings | 794 | (67 | ) | (592 | ) | 476 | 202 | 409 | ||||
Increase/(decrease) in liquid resources | 110 | (142 | ) | (5 | ) | (71 | ) | 105 | (213 | ) | ||
Decrease/(Increase) in net debt | 895 | (225 | ) | (671 | ) | 291 | 224 | 66 | ||||
Net cash flow from movement in liquid resources comprises: | ||||||||||||
Increase/(Decrease) in time deposits | 110 | (195 | ) | 3 | (9 | ) | 113 | (204 | ) | |||
(Decrease) in certificates of deposit | - | (2 | ) | - | (5 | ) | - | (7 | ) | |||
Increase/(Decrease) in other liquid investments | - | 55 | (8 | ) | (57 | ) | (8 | ) | (2 | ) | ||
Net cash outflow/(inflow) | 110 | (142 | ) | (5 | ) | (71 | ) | 105 | (213 | ) | ||
(a) | US$228 million of US Treasury bonds included within current asset investments for Rio Tinto plc and the Rio Tinto Group are excluded from liquid resources. These investments were purchased to be held as security for the deferred consideration on certain assets acquired during 2002, which is payable over the next three years. |
A-30
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO
LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
24 Share capital - Rio Tinto plc | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Number(m) | Number(m) | US$m | US$m | |||||
Share capital account | ||||||||
At 1 January | 1,065.48 | 1,064.59 | 154 | 154 | ||||
Ordinary shares issued | 1.19 | 0.89 | 1 | - | ||||
|
|
|
||||||
At 31 December | 1,066.67 | 1,065.48 | 155 | 154 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Issued and fully paid share capital | ||||||||
Special voting share of 10p (d) | 1 only | 1 only | - | - | ||||
DLC dividend share (d) | 1 only | 1 only | - | - | ||||
Ordinary shares of 10p each (equity) | 1,066.67 | 1,065.48 | 155 | 154 | ||||
|
||||||||
Total issued share capital | 155 | 154 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Unissued share capital | ||||||||
Ordinary shares of 10p each | 353.36 | 354.55 | 51 | 52 | ||||
Equalisation share of 10p (d) | 1 only | 1 only | - | - | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total authorised share capital | 1,420.03 | 1,420.03 | 206 | 206 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Options outstanding | ||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January | 9.34 | 7.93 | ||||||
- granted | 2.70 | 2.61 | ||||||
- exercised | (1.43 | ) | (0.89 | ) | ||||
- cancelled | (1.00 | ) | (0.31 | ) | ||||
Options outstanding at 31 December (b) | 9.61 | 9.34 | ||||||
(a) | 1,192,702 Ordinary shares were issued during the year resulting from the exercise of options under Rio Tinto plc employee share option schemes at prices between 521p and 1,061p (2002: 887,488 shares at prices between 476.99p and 1,061.0p). |
(b) | At 31 December 2003, options over the following
number of Ordinary shares were outstanding: -23,000 under the Rio Tinto plc Executive Share Option Scheme 1985 at a price of 861.0p and exercisable up to April 2004 (31 December 2002: 62,000 shares at prices between 689.0p and 861.0p). -7,662,925 under the Rio Tinto Share Option Plan 1998 at prices between 808.8p and 1458.6p (31 December 2002: 7,186,254 shares at prices between 808.8p and 1458.6p). The exercise of share options is subject to the satisfaction of a graduated performance condition set by the Remuneration committee at various dates up to March 2013. -1,920,430 under the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plan at prices between 521.0p and 1,150.0p and exercisable at various dates up to June 2009 (31 December 2002: 2,079,845 shares at prices between 521.0p and 1,061.0p). |
(c) | At the 2003 annual general meeting the shareholders resolved to renew the general authority for the company to buy back up to 10 per cent of its Ordinary shares of 10p each for a further period of 18 months. During the year to 31 December 2003 no shares were bought back. |
(d) | The 'Special Voting Share' was issued to facilitate the joint voting by shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited on Joint Decisions, following the DLC merger. Directors have the ability to issue an equalisation share if that is required under the terms of the DLC Merger Sharing Agreement. The 'DLC Dividend Share' was issued to facilitate the efficient management of funds within the DLC structure. |
(e) | The aggregate consideration received for shares issued during 2003 was US$20 million (2002: US$10 million). |
Further information on share options is given in note 42 'Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles'. |
A-31
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO
LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
24 Share capital - Rio Tinto Limited (100 per cent) | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Number(m) | Number(m) | US$m | US$m | |||||
Share capital account | ||||||||
At 1 January | 498.82 | 498.46 | 964 | 865 | ||||
Adjustment on currency translation | - | - | 311 | 94 | ||||
Share issues | 0.24 | 0.36 | 5 | 5 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
At 31 December | 499.06 | 498.82 | 1,280 | 964 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Options outstanding | ||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January | 4.69 | 3.08 | ||||||
- granted | 1.63 | 2.25 | ||||||
- exercised | (0.07 | ) | (0.21 | ) | ||||
- cancelled | (0.25 | ) | (0.43 | ) | ||||
Options outstanding at 31 December (d) | 6.00 | 4.69 | ||||||
(a) | 240,466 (2002: 359,821) shares were issued during the year, of which 71,563 (2002: 210,658) resulted from the exercise of options under Rio Tinto Limited employee share option schemes at prices between A$20.37 and A$27.86 (2002: A$20.14 and A$39.30) and 168,903 (2002: 149,163) from the vesting of shares under various Rio Tinto Mining Companies Comparative Plan |
(b) | Rio Tinto Limited is authorised by shareholder approvals obtained in 2003 to buy back up to all the Rio Tinto Limited shares held by Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc) plus, on-market, up to ten percent of the publicly held capital in any 12 month period. Rio Tinto Limited is seeking a renewal of these approvals at its annual general meeting in 2004. During the year to 31 December 2003, no shares were bought back (2002: nil). |
(c) | Total share capital in issue at 31 December 2003 was 499.1 million shares plus one special voting share and one DLC Dividend Share (31 December 2002: 498.8 million shares plus one Special Voting Share). The 'Special Voting Share' was issued to facilitate the joint voting by shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited on joint decisions following the DLC merger. Directors have the ability to issue an Equalisation Share if that is required under the terms of the DLC Merger Sharing Agreement. The DLC Dividend Share was issued to facilitate the efficient management of funds within the DLC structure. |
(d) | At 31 December 2003, options over the following
number of shares were outstanding: - 3,602,137 shares under the Rio Tinto Share Option Plan at prices between A$20.14 and A$39.87 (31 December 2002: 2,439,330 shares at prices between A$20.14 and A$39.87) . These share options are exercisable at various dates up to March 2013, subject to the satisfaction of a graduated performance condition set by the Remuneration committee. - 2,385,453 shares under the Rio Tinto Limited Share Savings Plan at prices between A$25.57 and A$27.86 (31 December 2002: 2,246,174 shares at a price between A$27.57 and A$27.86). These share options are exercisable at various dates up to June 2009. |
(e) | The aggregate consideration received for shares issued during 2003 was US$5 million (2002: US$5 million). |
A-32
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO
LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -
(continued)
25 Share premium and reserves | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Share premium account | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 1,610 | 1,600 | - | - | 1,610 | 1,600 | ||||||
Premium on issues of ordinary shares | 19 | 10 | - | - | 19 | 10 | ||||||
At 31 December | 1,629 | 1,610 | - | - | 1,629 | 1,610 | ||||||
Parent and subsidiary companies' profit and loss account | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 2,800 | 3,060 | 1,156 | 600 | 3,968 | 3,676 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation (b) | 553 | 199 | 1,009 | 270 | 1,569 | 472 | ||||||
Retained (loss)/profit for the year | 80 | (552 | ) | 593 | 432 | 614 | (180 | ) | ||||
Transfers and other movements (c) | 96 | 93 | (42 | ) | (146 | ) | 115 | - | ||||
At 31 December | 3,529 | 2,800 | 2,716 | 1,156 | 6,266 | 3,968 | ||||||
Joint ventures' profit and loss account | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 267 | 264 | 237 | 266 | 504 | 531 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation (b) | - | 3 | 55 | 11 | 53 | 13 | ||||||
Retained (loss)/profit for the year | 52 | - | (37 | ) | (40 | ) | 15 | (40 | ) | |||
Transfers and other movements (c) | 16 | - | (62 | ) | - | (46 | ) | - | ||||
At 31 December | 335 | 267 | 193 | 237 | 526 | 504 | ||||||
Associates' profit and loss account | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 819 | 577 | 67 | 21 | 107 | 56 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation (b) | 483 | 134 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 6 | ||||||
Retained (loss)/profit for the year | 141 | 108 | 8 | 45 | (3 | ) | 45 | |||||
Transfers and other movements (c) | (9 | ) | - | (60 | ) | - | (69 | ) | - | |||
At 31 December | 1,434 | 819 | 18 | 67 | 42 | 107 | ||||||
Total profit and loss account | 5,298 | 3,886 | 2,927 | 1,460 | 6,834 | 4,579 | ||||||
Other reserves | ||||||||||||
At 1 January | 249 | 247 | 86 | 76 | 303 | 294 | ||||||
Adjustment on currency translation | 12 | 2 | 31 | 10 | 31 | 9 | ||||||
At 31 December | 261 | 249 | 117 | 86 | 334 | 303 | ||||||
Total reserves | ||||||||||||
- Parent and subsidiary companies | 3,731 | 3,002 | 2,835 | 1,242 | 6,585 | 4,256 | ||||||
- Joint ventures | 335 | 267 | 191 | 237 | 526 | 504 | ||||||
- Associated companies | 1,493 | 866 | 18 | 67 | 57 | 122 | ||||||
5,559 | 4,135 | 3,044 | 1,546 | 7,168 | 4,882 | |||||||
(a) | A substantial portion of Group reserves are in overseas companies. If these reserves were distributed, there would be a liability to withholding taxes and to corporate tax in the UK and Australia. This would, however, be reduced by double taxation relief. Provision is made in these accounts for such additional tax only to the extent that dividends have been accrued or there is a binding agreement to distribute such past earnings. |
(b) | Adjustments on currency translation include net of tax exchange gains on net debt of US$715 million (2002: gains of US$211 million), Rio Tinto plc gains of US$299 million (2002: gains of US$55 million) and Rio Tinto Limited gains of US$667 million (2002: gains of US$250 million). |
(c) | 'Transfers and other movements' for Rio Tinto plc in 2003 include US$102 million (2002: US$91 million) relating to a dividend on the DLC dividend share received from Rio Tinto Limited and US$1 million (2002: US$2 million) relating to Rio Tinto Limited share issues (page A-6 note (c)). Other 'Transfers and other movements' in 2003 primarily relate to the disposal of a subsidiary, joint venture and associate. In 2001 certain tax liabilities arising from profits of joint ventures were reclassified as direct liabilities of subsidiary companies. The reclassification of these liabilities was included in 'Transfers and other movements'. |
(d) | At 31 December 2003, cumulative goodwill written off directly to reserves for the Rio Tinto Group amounted to US$3,142 million (2002: US$3,087 million), Rio Tinto plc US$2,740 million (2002: US$2,897 million) and Rio Tinto Limited US$402 million (2002: US$304 million). |
A-33
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
26 | Product analysis - Rio Tinto Group |
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||
% |
% |
US$m |
US$m |
|||||
Operating assets (a), (b) | ||||||||
Diamonds | 8.0 |
7.1 |
1,261 |
968 |
||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 18.2 |
23.0 |
2,877 |
3,109 |
||||
Iron ore | 25.0 |
20.7 |
3,951 |
2,803 |
||||
Coal | 14.1 |
13.9 |
2,234 |
1,879 |
||||
Aluminium | 20.6 |
17.5 |
3,261 |
2,365 |
||||
Industrial minerals | 12.9 |
15.5 |
2,044 |
2,100 |
||||
Other products | 1.2 |
2.3 |
181 |
320 |
||||
Total | 100.0 |
100.0 |
15,809 |
13,544 |
||||
Unallocated items | (126 |
) |
(335 |
) |
||||
Less: net debt | (5,646 |
) |
(5,747 |
) |
||||
Net assets | 10,037 |
7,462 |
||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
% |
% |
% |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
|||||||
Gross turnover | ||||||||||||
Copper | 12.7 |
12.4 |
12.2 |
1,495 |
1,348 |
1,277 |
||||||
Gold (all sources) | 9.1 |
9.7 |
9.5 |
1,068 |
1,046 |
988 |
||||||
Iron ore | 18.4 |
16.4 |
16.3 |
2,165 |
1,772 |
1,704 |
||||||
Coal | 18.1 |
20.3 |
20.1 |
2,125 |
2,203 |
2,102 |
||||||
Aluminium | 15.7 |
15.4 |
16.4 |
1,847 |
1,663 |
1,714 |
||||||
Industrial minerals | 15.7 |
17.5 |
17.5 |
1,849 |
1,898 |
1,825 |
||||||
Diamonds | 4.7 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
556 |
372 |
278 |
||||||
Other products | 5.6 |
4.9 |
5.3 |
650 |
526 |
550 |
||||||
Total | 100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
11,755 |
10,828 |
10,438 |
||||||
Profit before tax (a) | ||||||||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 27.3 |
19.0 |
15.1 |
680 |
536 |
474 |
||||||
Iron ore | 30.1 |
24.2 |
24.3 |
748 |
680 |
761 |
||||||
Coal | 10.2 |
18.5 |
17.9 |
255 |
520 |
560 |
||||||
Aluminium | 11.5 |
13.0 |
16.0 |
287 |
365 |
500 |
||||||
Industrial minerals | 11.5 |
19.9 |
20.8 |
286 |
559 |
651 |
||||||
Diamonds | 7.5 |
3.4 |
2.8 |
187 |
96 |
89 |
||||||
Other products | 1.9 |
2.0 |
3.1 |
46 |
58 |
96 |
||||||
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
2,489 |
2,814 |
3,131 |
|||||||
Exploration and evaluation | (127 |
) |
(130 |
) |
(130 |
) |
||||||
Net interest (d) | (139 |
) |
(161 |
) |
(256 |
) |
||||||
Other items | (255 |
) |
(118 |
) |
(47 |
) |
||||||
1,968 |
2,405 |
2,698 |
||||||||||
Exceptional items (e) | 126 |
(1,094 |
) |
(715 |
) |
|||||||
Total | 2,094 |
1,311 |
1,983 |
|||||||||
Net earnings (a) | ||||||||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 27.1 |
20.8 |
15.6 |
429 |
369 |
298 |
||||||
Iron ore | 31.6 |
25.6 |
26.4 |
500 |
455 |
504 |
||||||
Coal | 10.3 |
17.9 |
18.1 |
163 |
318 |
345 |
||||||
Aluminium | 11.9 |
14.5 |
17.3 |
189 |
257 |
330 |
||||||
Industrial minerals | 10.0 |
16.4 |
17.4 |
159 |
292 |
332 |
||||||
Diamonds | 7.0 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
111 |
63 |
58 |
||||||
Other products | 2.1 |
1.3 |
2.1 |
33 |
22 |
39 |
||||||
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
1,584 |
1,776 |
1,906 |
|||||||
Exploration and evaluation | (98 |
) |
(109 |
) |
(104 |
) |
||||||
Net interest (d) | (59 |
) |
(95 |
) |
(167 |
) |
||||||
Other items | (45 |
) |
(42 |
) |
27 |
|||||||
1,382 |
1,530 |
1,662 |
||||||||||
Exceptional items (e) | 126 |
(879 |
) |
(583 |
) |
|||||||
Total | 1,508 |
651 |
1,079 |
|||||||||
Note references above are explained on page A-35. |
A-34
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
26 | Product analysis - Rio Tinto Group (continued) |
Notes | |
(a) | In 2003, the way in which post reirement costs are attributed to Business Units, and consequently product groups, has been revised. The regular cost component of retirement costs is included in business unit earnings and the balance of post retirement costs is recognised centrally in 'other items'. The analyses of 2002 Operating assets, Profit before tax and Net earnings have been restated to reflect this allocation. There was no impact on Operating assets, Profit before tax or Net earnings for the Group. The analyses of 2001 Profit before tax and Net earnings have not been restated. |
(b) | Operating assets of subsidiaries comprise net assets before deducting net debt, less outside shareholders' interests which are calculated by reference to the net assets of the relevant companies (i.e. net of such companies' debt). For joint ventures and associates, Rio Tinto's net investment is shown. |
(c) | The above analyses include the Rio Tinto share of the results of joint ventures and associates including interest. |
(d) | The amortisation of discount is included in the applicable product category. All other financing costs of subsidiaries are shown as 'net interest'. |
(e) | Of the exceptional charges in 2002, US$596 million before and after tax relates to Kennecott Utah Copper ('KUC') which is included in the copper, gold and by-products segment and US$443 million before tax (US$235 million net of tax and minorities) relates to the Iron Ore Company of Canada ('IOC') which is included in the iron ore segment. In 2001, US$644 million before tax and US$531 million after tax related to KUC. Exceptional charges are shown separately in the above analyses of Profit before tax and Net earnings. |
The Group figures on page A-34 include the following amounts for joint ventures:
2003 |
2002 |
|||||
US$m |
US$m |
|||||
Net investment | ||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 1,072 |
1,027 |
||||
Coal | 1,080 |
828 |
||||
Other | 71 |
66 |
||||
Total | 2,223 |
1,921 |
||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
||||
Gross turnover | ||||||
Copper | 625 |
419 |
369 |
|||
Gold | 283 |
236 |
247 |
|||
Coal | 836 |
956 |
912 |
|||
Other | 76 |
51 |
84 |
|||
Total | 1,820 |
1,662 |
1,612 |
|||
Profit before tax | ||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 378 |
232 |
220 |
|||
Coal | 139 |
285 |
297 |
|||
Other | 3 |
3 |
3 |
|||
Exceptional charges | - |
(16 |
) |
- |
||
Total | 520 |
504 |
520 |
|||
Net earnings | ||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 256 |
155 |
141 |
|||
Coal | 102 |
198 |
201 |
|||
Other | 2 |
2 |
2 |
|||
Exceptional charges | - |
(16 |
) |
- |
||
360 | 339 | 344 | ||||
The Group figures on page A-34 include the following amounts for associates: | ||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||
US$m |
US$m |
|||||
Net investment | ||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 362 |
505 |
||||
Other | 59 |
65 |
||||
Total | 421 |
570 |
||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
||||
Gross turnover | ||||||
Copper | 185 |
259 |
267 |
|||
Gold | 411 |
355 |
333 |
|||
Other | 111 |
109 |
74 |
|||
Total | 707 |
723 |
674 |
|||
Profit before tax | ||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 147 |
130 |
97 |
|||
Other | 33 |
59 |
61 |
|||
Total | 180 |
189 |
158 |
|||
Net earnings | ||||||
Copper, gold and by-products | 77 |
93 |
51 |
|||
Other | 21 |
36 |
38 |
|||
Total | 98 |
129 |
89 |
|||
A-35
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
27 | Geographical analysis - Rio Tinto Group |
By country of location | |
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||
% |
% |
US$m |
US$m |
|||||
Operating assets | ||||||||
North America | 30.7 |
36.5 |
4,846 |
4,949 |
||||
Australia and New Zealand | 55.7 |
47.6 |
8,799 |
6,446 |
||||
South America | 4.1 |
5.2 |
652 |
703 |
||||
Africa | 3.6 |
3.5 |
577 |
477 |
||||
Indonesia | 3.5 |
4.4 |
554 |
599 |
||||
Europe and other countries | 2.4 |
2.8 |
381 |
370 |
||||
Total | 100.0 |
100.0 |
15,809 |
13,544 |
||||
Unallocated items |
(126 |
) |
(335 |
) |
||||
Less: net debt | (5,646 |
) |
(5,747 |
) |
||||
Net assets |
10,037 |
7,462 |
||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
% | % | % | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Gross turnover by country of origin | ||||||||||||
North America | 30.3 | 31.2 | 30.1 | 3,567 | 3,377 | 3,143 | ||||||
Australia and New Zealand | 43.8 | 41.6 | 42.0 | 5,152 | 4,500 | 4,386 | ||||||
South America | 5.8 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 682 | 525 | 524 | ||||||
Africa | 5.6 | 7.2 | 8.2 | 662 | 783 | 857 | ||||||
Indonesia | 8.8 | 9.6 | 9.1 | 1,037 | 1,039 | 951 | ||||||
Europe and other countries | 5.7 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 655 | 604 | 577 | ||||||
Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 11,755 | 10,828 | 10,438 | ||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
% | % | % | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Profit before tax | ||||||||||||
North America | 18.9 | 17.1 | 15.2 | 399 | 439 | 449 | ||||||
Australia and New Zealand | 53.7 | 57.1 | 56.4 | 1,131 | 1,464 | 1,666 | ||||||
South America | 11.1 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 234 | 86 | 85 | ||||||
Africa | 3.1 | 11.8 | 14.2 | 65 | 303 | 420 | ||||||
Indonesia | 16.5 | 12.2 | 8.6 | 348 | 312 | 254 | ||||||
Europe and other countries | (3.3 | ) | (1.6 | ) | 2.7 | (70 | ) | (38 | ) | 80 | ||
100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 2,107 | 2,566 | 2,954 | |||||||
Net interest (c) | (139 | ) | (161 | ) | (256 | ) | ||||||
1,968 | 2,405 | 2,698 | ||||||||||
Exceptional items (d) | 126 | (1,094 | ) | (715 | ) | |||||||
Total | 2,094 | 1,311 | 1,983 | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
% | % | % | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Net earnings | ||||||||||||
North America | 25.2 | 20.1 | 19.6 | 363 | 326 | 359 | ||||||
Australia and New Zealand | 52.3 | 57.8 | 57.5 | 754 | 939 | 1,052 | ||||||
South America | 10.8 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 156 | 65 | 56 | ||||||
Africa | 0.8 | 7.1 | 7.8 | 12 | 115 | 143 | ||||||
Indonesia | 12.6 | 11.4 | 7.0 | 181 | 185 | 128 | ||||||
Europe and other countries | (1.7 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 5.0 | (25 | ) | (5 | ) | 91 | ||
100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 1,441 | 1,625 | 1,829 | |||||||
Net interest (c) | (59 | ) | (95 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||||
1,382 | 1,530 | 1,662 | ||||||||||
Exceptional items (d) | 126 | (879 | ) | (583 | ) | |||||||
Total | 1,508 | 651 | 1,079 | |||||||||
Note references above are explained on page A-37. |
A-36
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
27 | Geographical analysis - Rio Tinto Group (continued) |
Notes | |
(a) | Operating assets of subsidiaries comprise net assets before deducting net debt, less outside shareholders' interests which are calculated by reference to the net assets of the relevant companies (i.e. net of such companies' debt). For joint ventures and associates, Rio Tinto's net investment is shown. |
(b) | The above analyses include the Rio Tinto share of the results of joint ventures and associates including interest. |
(c) | The amortisation of discount is included in the applicable geographical area. All other financing costs of subsidiaries are shown as net interest. |
(d) | The exceptional items in 2003 relate to the profit on disposal of interests in a subsidiary, joint venture and associate. Of the 2002 exceptional charges, US$596 million before tax relates to Kennecott Utah Copper ('KUC') and US$443 million before tax re the Iron Ore Company of Canada ('IOC'), both of which are included in 'North America'. The impact of 2002 exceptional charges on net earnings was US$596 million for KUC and US$235 million for IOC. Of the 2001 exceptional charges, US$644 million before tax and US$531 million after tax related to KUC. Exceptional charges are shown separately in the above analyses of profit before tax and net earnings. |
The Group figures shown on page A-36 include the following amounts for joint ventures:
2003 | 2002 | |||
|
||||
US$m | US$m | |||
Net investment by origin | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 1,108 | 834 | ||
South America | 552 | 498 | ||
Indonesia | 523 | 567 | ||
Other | 40 | 22 | ||
Total | 2,223 | 1,921 | ||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||
|
|
|
||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||
Gross turnover by origin | ||||||
Australia and New Zealand | 550 | 587 | 545 | |||
South America | 502 | 283 | 289 | |||
Indonesia | 539 | 565 | 528 | |||
Other | 229 | 227 | 250 | |||
Total | 1,820 | 1,662 | 1,612 | |||
Profit before tax by origin | ||||||
Australia and New Zealand | 57 | 214 | 207 | |||
South America | 183 | 49 | 64 | |||
Indonesia | 241 | 231 | 228 | |||
Other | 39 | 26 | 21 | |||
Exceptional items | - | (16 | ) | - | ||
Total | 520 | 504 | 520 | |||
Net earnings by origin | ||||||
Australia and New Zealand | 46 | 151 | 145 | |||
South America | 122 | 32 | 41 | |||
Indonesia | 155 | 149 | 142 | |||
Other | 37 | 23 | 16 | |||
Exceptional items | - | (16 | ) | - | ||
Total | 360 | 339 | 344 | |||
A-37
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
27 Geographical analysis - Rio Tinto Group (continued)
The Group figures shown on page A-36 include the following amounts for associates:
2003
|
2002
|
|||||||||||
US$m
|
US$m
|
|||||||||||
Net investment by origin | ||||||||||||
North America | 53 | 71 | ||||||||||
Indonesia | 143 | 127 | ||||||||||
Other | 225 | 372 | ||||||||||
Total | 421 | 570 | ||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
||||||||||
Gross turnover by origin | ||||||||||||
North America | 155 | 131 | 128 | |||||||||
Indonesia | 344 | 306 | 296 | |||||||||
Other | 208 | 286 | 250 | |||||||||
Total | 707 | 723 | 674 | |||||||||
Profit before tax by origin | ||||||||||||
North America | 67 | 42 | 45 | |||||||||
Indonesia | 72 | 54 | 35 | |||||||||
Other | 41 | 93 | 78 | |||||||||
Total | 180 | 189 | 158 | |||||||||
Net earnings by origin | ||||||||||||
North America | 49 | 33 | 36 | |||||||||
Indonesia | 23 | 19 | 1 | |||||||||
Other | 26 | 77 | 52 | |||||||||
Total | 98 | 129 | 89 | |||||||||
By destination | ||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
% |
% |
% |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
|||||||
Turnover by destination | ||||||||||||
North America | 25.7 | 29.0 | 28.1 | 3,024 | 3,143 | 2,936 | ||||||
Europe | 23.3 | 21.6 | 22.4 | 2,742 | 2,340 | 2,338 | ||||||
Japan | 18 | 17.9 | 19.3 | 2,119 | 1,943 | 2,012 | ||||||
Other Asia | 21.5 | 19.2 | 18.9 | 2,527 | 2,083 | 1,974 | ||||||
Australia and New Zealand | 7.2 | 8.2 | 7.1 | 845 | 887 | 740 | ||||||
Other | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 498 | 432 | 438 | ||||||
Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 11,755 | 10,828 | 10,438 | ||||||
The Group figures shown above include the following amounts for joint ventures:
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
||||
Turnover by destination | ||||||
North America | 191 | 214 | 225 | |||
Europe | 300 | 303 | 304 | |||
Japan | 543 | 575 | 506 | |||
Other | 786 | 570 | 577 | |||
Total | 1,820 | 1,662 | 1,612 | |||
The Group figures shown above include the following amounts for associates: | ||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
||||
Turnover by destination | ||||||
North America | 172 |
157 |
159 |
|||
Europe | 220 |
248 |
251 |
|||
Other | 315 |
318 |
264 |
|||
Total | 707 |
723 |
674 |
|||
(a) | An analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment by location is included in note 42 'Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles'. |
A-38
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
28 Financial Instruments
The Group's policies with regard to currency, interest rate and commodity price exposures, and the use of derivative financial instruments, are discussed in the following sections on pages 34
and 35 of the Financial review included in the Annual report and financial statements:
- Exchange rates, reporting currencies and currency exposure
- Interest rates
- Commodity prices
- Treasury management and financial instruments
Except where stated, the information given below relates to the financial instruments of the parent companies and their subsidiaries and excludes joint ventures and associates. The information provided is as at the end of the financial year. Short term debtors and creditors are included only in the currency analysis.
Financial instruments held by companies acquired are marked to market as part of the adjustment of assets and liabilities acquired to fair value. Where appropriate, these fair value adjustments are shown in the disclosures below.
A) Currency
The Group's material currency derivatives are itemised below:
a) Forward contracts hedging trading transactions
Weighted
|
Fair
value
|
Total
fair
|
||||||||
Buy
|
Sell
|
average
|
value
|
|||||||
currency
|
currency
|
exchange
|
||||||||
amount
|
amount
|
rate
|
||||||||
Buy
Australian dollar: sell US dollar
|
A$m
|
US$m
|
A$/US$
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
|||||
Less than 1 year | 257 | 156 | 0.61 | 32 | ||||||
1 to 5 years | 657 | 399 | 0.61 | 56 | ||||||
More than 5 years | 111 | 67 | 0.60 | 7 | ||||||
Total | 1,025 | 622 | 0.61 | 95 | ||||||
Of the above, contracts to sell US$540 million were acquired with companies purchased in 2000 and 2001 and US$62 million was entered into by Comalco before it became a wholly owned subsidiary.
Buy New Zealand dollar: sell US dollar | NZ$m |
US$m |
NZ$/US$ |
US$m |
||||||
Less than 1 year | 130 |
65 |
0.50 |
19 |
||||||
1 to 5 years | 485 |
220 |
0.45 |
69 |
||||||
More than 5 years | 260 |
117 |
0.45 |
29 |
||||||
Total | 875 |
402 |
0.46 |
117 |
||||||
Buy Canadian dollar: sell US dollar (all of which were acquired with companies purchased in 2000)
C$m |
US$m |
C$/US$ |
US$m |
|||||||
Less than 1 year | 18 |
12 |
0.68 |
2 |
2 |
|||||
Other currency forward contracts | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Total fair value | 207 | |||||||||
Adjust: Fair value recognised on acquisition in respect of these contracts | 22 | |||||||||
(of which US$14 million was recognised on acquisition) | ||||||||||
Fair value not recognised | 229 | |||||||||
A-39
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
28 Financial Instruments (continued)
b) Options hedging trading transactions
The Group acquired a series of bought call options with companies purchased in 2000. The majority of these bought call options are matched at 31 December 2003 by sold puts. The combination of
these instruments has a similar effect to forward contracts. In the event that the Australian dollar strengthens above pre-determined levels, the put options are 'knocked-out' i.e. cancelled. During 2003, US$57 million of these sold puts were
knocked out and the remainder were knocked out in January 2004.
Weighted
|
Fair
value
|
Total
fair
|
||||||||
Buy
|
Sell
|
average
|
value
|
|||||||
currency
|
currency
|
strike
|
||||||||
amount
|
amount
|
rate
|
||||||||
Bought
A$ call options
|
A$m
|
US$m
|
A$/US$
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
|||||
Less than 1 year | 94 |
66 |
0.70 |
4 |
||||||
1 to 5 years | 340 |
239 |
0.70 |
13 |
||||||
Total | 434 |
305 |
0.70 |
17 |
||||||
As noted above, the following sold A$ put options which were outstanding at 31 December 2003, automatically expired when the Australian dollar strengthened above the pre-determined 'barrier' rate in early January 2004. Details are shown below:
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
Fair
value
|
||||||||||
Buy
|
Sell
|
average
|
average
|
|||||||||
currency
|
currency
|
strike
|
barrier
|
|||||||||
amount
|
amount
|
rate
|
rate
|
|||||||||
Sold
'knock-out' A$ put options
|
A$m
|
US$m
|
A$/US$
|
A$/US$
|
US$m
|
|||||||
Less than 1 year | 76 | 54 | 0.70 | 0.77 | (1 | ) | ||||||
1 to 5 years | 275 | 194 | 0.70 | 0.77 | (6 | ) | ||||||
Total | 351 | 248 | 0.70 | 0.77 | (7 | ) | ||||||
Total fair value | 10 | |||||||||||
Adjust: Fair value recognised on acquisition in respect of these contracts | 27 | |||||||||||
Fair value not recognised | 37 | |||||||||||
c) Forward contracts hedging future capital expenditure
Weighted |
Fair
value |
Total |
||||||||||
Buy |
Sell |
average |
fair
value |
|||||||||
currency |
currency |
exchange |
||||||||||
amount |
amount |
rate |
||||||||||
Buy
Australian dollar: sell US dollar |
A$m |
US$m |
A$/US$ |
US$m |
US$m |
|||||||
Less than 1 year | 393 | 198 | 0.50 | 93 | ||||||||
Fair value not recognised | 93 | |||||||||||
d)
Currency swaps hedging non US dollar debt |
Buy currency amount
|
Sell currency amount US$m
|
Weighted average exchange rate
|
Fair
value
|
Total fair
value US$m
|
|||||||
Buy Euro: sell US dollars | ||||||||||||
Less than 1 year | Euro 40m | 46 | 0.88 | 5 | ||||||||
1 to 5 years | Euro 975m | 934 | 1.04 | 292 | ||||||||
980 | 1.04 | 297 | ||||||||||
Buy Japanese yen: sell US dollars | ||||||||||||
1 to 5 years | Yen 21 billion | 177 | 119 | 20 | ||||||||
Buy sterling: sell US dollars | ||||||||||||
1 to 5 years | £175m |
251 | 0.70 | 61 | ||||||||
Buy Swiss francs: sell US dollars | ||||||||||||
1 to 5 years | CHF70m | 48 | 1.47 | 9 | ||||||||
Total currency swaps | 1,456 | 387 | ||||||||||
Fair value recognised within carrying value of debt (a) | (387 | ) | ||||||||||
Fair value not recognised | - | |||||||||||
(a) | These fair values comprise only the 'currency element' of the swaps. The fair value of the 'interest element' is presented in the summary of interest rate swaps. |
A-40
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
28 Financial Instruments (continued)
e) Currency exposures arising from the Group's net monetary assets/(liabilities)
After taking into account the effect of relevant derivative instruments, almost all the Group's net debt is either denominated in US dollars or in the functional currency of the entity holding the debt. The table below sets out the currency exposures arising from net monetary assets/(liabilities) other than net debt, which are not denominated in the functional currency of the relevant business unit. Gains and losses resulting from such exposures are recorded in the profit and loss account. This table reflects the currency exposures before adjusting for tax and outside interests.
Currency of exposure | Currency of exposure | |||||||||||
US |
Other |
2003 |
US |
Other |
2002 |
|||||||
dollar |
currencies |
Total |
dollar |
currencies |
Total |
|||||||
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
|||||||
Functional currency of business unit : | ||||||||||||
United States dollar | - | 30 | 30 | - | 32 | 32 | ||||||
Australian dollar | 385 | (16 | ) | 369 | 346 | 35 | 381 | |||||
Canadian dollar | 51 | (1 | ) | 50 | 56 | - | 56 | |||||
South African rand | 47 | 6 | 53 | 105 | 26 | 131 | ||||||
Other currencies | 20 | 15 | 35 | 28 | (1 | ) | 27 | |||||
Total | 503 | 34 | 537 | 535 | 92 | 627 | ||||||
The table below shows the Rio Tinto share of the above currency exposures after tax and outside interests:
Currency of exposure | Currency of exposure | |||||||||||
US |
Other |
2003 |
US |
Other |
2002 |
|||||||
dollar |
currencies |
Total |
dollar |
currencies |
Total |
|||||||
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
|||||||
Functional currency of business unit : | ||||||||||||
United States dollar | - | 20 | 20 | - | 22 | 22 | ||||||
Australian dollar | 251 | (11 | ) | 240 | 224 | 24 | 248 | |||||
Canadian dollar | 19 | (1 | ) | 18 | 21 | - | 21 | |||||
South African rand | 16 | 2 | 18 | 37 | 9 | 46 | ||||||
Other currencies | 14 | 9 | 23 | 17 | (1 | ) | 16 | |||||
Total | 300 | 19 | 319 | 299 | 54 | 353 | ||||||
B) Interest rates
(i) Financial liabilities and assets including the effect of interest rate and currency swaps
This table analyses the currency and interest rate composition of the Group's financial assets and liabilities:
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||
United |
Australian |
Sterling |
South |
Other |
Total |
Total |
||||||||
States |
dollar |
African |
currencies |
carrying |
carrying |
|||||||||
dollar |
rand |
value |
value |
|||||||||||
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
||||||||
Financial liabilities (page A-42 note (f)) | ||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | (721 | ) |
- | - | - | - | (721 | ) |
(685 | ) |
||||
Floating rate | (4,661 |
) |
(339 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(233 |
) |
(74 |
) |
(5,322 |
) |
(5,389 |
) |
Non interest bearing (page A-42 note (g)) | (219 |
) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(219 |
) |
(287 |
) |
||||
(5,601 |
) |
(339 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(233 |
) |
(74 |
) |
(6,262 |
) |
(6,361 |
) |
|
Financial assets (page A-42 note (f)) | ||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | 239 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
239 |
304 |
|||||||
Floating rate (including loans to joint ventures and associates) | 368 |
92 |
21 |
3 |
87 |
571 |
580 |
|||||||
(4,994 |
) |
(247 |
) |
6 |
(230 |
) |
13 |
(5,452 |
) |
(5,477 |
) |
|||
Adjusted to exclude: | ||||||||||||||
US Treasury bonds (fixed rate) | (239 |
) |
(304 |
) | ||||||||||
Deferred consideration
payable (non interest bearing) |
219 |
287 |
||||||||||||
Loans
to joint ventures and associates
(floating rate) |
(174 |
) |
(253 |
) | ||||||||||
Net debt (note 23) | (5,646 |
) |
(5,747 |
) | ||||||||||
A-41
RIO
TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
28 Financial Instruments (continued)
(ii) Fixed
rate liabilities and assets, presented gross, and interest rate and currency
swaps
The US$721 million
(2002: US$685 million) of fixed rate liabilities shown in (i) above comprise
gross liabilities of US$2,716 million (2002: US$2,539 million) less the interest
rate swaps of US$1,995 million (2002: US$1,854 million) shown below:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
Excess of | Excess of | |||||||||||
Gross liabilities | Average | fair value | Average | fair value | ||||||||
fixed | over | fixed | over | |||||||||
Principal | rate | principal | Principal | rate | principal | |||||||
US$m | % p.a. | US$m | US$m | % p.a. | US$m | |||||||
Maturity | ||||||||||||
Less than 1 year | - | - | - | 621 | 5.4 | (17 | ) | |||||
1 to 5 years | 1,350 | 4.6 | (33 | ) | 750 | 6.1 | (66 | ) | ||||
More than 5 years | 100 | 7.2 | (17 | ) | 100 | 7.2 | (18 | ) | ||||
US$ fixed rate liabilities | 1,450 | 4.8 | (50 | ) | 1,471 | 5.9 | (101 | ) | ||||
Less than 1 year | 46 | 2 | - | - | - | - | ||||||
1 to 5 years | 1,220 | 4.5 | (62 | ) | 1,068 | 4.7 | (46 | ) | ||||
Non US dollar fixed rate liabilities (a) | 1,266 | 4.4 | (62 | ) | 1,068 | 4.7 | (46 | ) | ||||
Fixed rate liabilities before interest rate swaps | 2,716 | (112 | ) | 2,539 | (147 | ) | ||||||
Interest rate swaps | Average | Average | ||||||||||
fixed | 2003 | fixed | 2002 | |||||||||
Maturity | Principal | rate | Fair value(i) | Principal | rate | Fair value | ||||||
US$m | % p.a. | US$m | US$m | % p.a. | US$m | |||||||
Less than 1 year | - | - | - | 321 | 4.7 | 9 | ||||||
1 to 5 years | 1,050 | 5.1 | 41 | 750 | 6.1 | 74 | ||||||
Interest rate swaps to US$ floating rates | 1,050 | 5.1 | 41 | 1,071 | 5.7 | 83 | ||||||
Less than 1 year | 46 | 2.3 | - | - | - | - | ||||||
1 to 5 years | 1,220 | 4.5 | 55 | 1,068 | 4.7 | 48 | ||||||
Interest rate swaps from non US$ fixed rates to US$ floating rates (a) | 1,266 | 4.4 | 55 | 1,068 | 4.7 | 48 | ||||||
Less than 1 year | 20 | 7.5 | (1 | ) | - | - | - | |||||
1 to 5 years | 225 | 7.0 | (19 | ) | 245 | 7.1 | (28 | ) | ||||
More than 5 years | 76 | 5.6 | (8 | ) | 40 | 5.6 | (9 | ) | ||||
Interest rate swaps to US$ fixed rates (b) | 321 | 6.7 | (28 | ) | 285 | 6.9 | (37 | ) | ||||
Interest rate swaps (net impact) | 1,995 | 68 | 1,854 | 94 | ||||||||
Total fixed rate financial liabilities after interest rate | ||||||||||||
swaps (b), (d) | 721 | (44 | ) | 685 | (53 | ) | ||||||
(i) | These fair values include the interest element of the currency swaps described earlier. |
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
Excess of | Excess of | |||||||||||
Gross assets | Average | fair value | Average | fair value | ||||||||
fixed | over | fixed | over | |||||||||
Maturity | Principal | rate | principal | Principal | rate | principal | ||||||
US$m | % p.a. | US$m | US$m | % p.a. | US$m | |||||||
Less than 1 year | 239 | 1.0 | (1 | ) | 304 | 1.7 | 4 | |||||
Total fixed rate financial assets | 239 | 1.0 | (1 | ) | 304 | 1.7 | 4 | |||||
(a) | All of the above non US$ liabilities are swapped to US$. The principal amounts shown above reflect the currency element of the related currency swaps. |
(b) | As a consequence of acquisitions during 2000, the Group holds a number of interest rate swaps to receive US$ floating rates and pay US$ fixed rates which have been included in the total of fixed rate debt shown above. |
(c) | The Group has US$119 million of finance leases (2002: US$119 million), the largest of which has a principal of US$85 million, a maturity of 2018 and a floating interest rate. |
(d) | After taking into account all interest rate swaps, the Group's fixed rate debt totals US$721 million and has a weighted average interest rate of 5.1 per cent and a weighted average time to maturity of four years (2002: US$685 million with a weighted average interest rate of 6.6 per cent and a weighted average time to maturity of three years). |
(e) | Interest rates on the great majority of the Group's floating rate financial liabilities and assets will have been reset within six months. The interest rates applicable to the Group's US dollar denominated floating rate financial liabilities and assets did not differ materially at the year end from the three month US dollar LIBOR rate of 1.2 per cent. |
(f) | The above table does not include the remaining US$39 million (2002: US$60 million) net provision for the mark to market valuation of the hedge books held by companies acquired in 2000 and 2001 and other financial assets of US$145 million (2002: US$122 million), all of which are non interest bearing. Further details of the instruments included within the acquisition provision for mark to market valuation of the hedge books held by companies acquired are shown in section A above and section C below. |
(g) | These non interest bearing financial liabilities have been presented in the financial statements on a discounted basis, using a discount rate of 3.8 per cent. |
A-42
RIO
TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
28 Financial Instruments (continued)
C) Commodities
The Group's material commodity derivatives are itemised below:
2003 | 2002 | ||||
Fair value | Fair value | ||||
US$m | US$m | ||||
Commodity derivatives, including options, of which US$2 million relates to acquisitions during 2000 | (20 | ) | 6 | ||
Adjust: Fair value recognised on acquisition in respect of these contracts | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | |
Fair value not recognised | (22 | ) | 3 | ||
D) Liquidity
The maturity profile
of the Group's net debt is discussed in the Balance Sheet section of the
Financial review on page 33 of the Annual report and financial statements.
Financial assets and liabilities are repayable as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Financial liabilities | ||||
Within 1 year, or on demand | (2,270 | ) | (3,434 | ) |
Between 1 and 2 years | (672 | ) | (215 | ) |
Between 2 and 3 years | (1,109 | ) | (394 | ) |
Between 3 and 4 years | (1,019 | ) | (1,042 | ) |
Between 4 and 5 years | (745 | ) | (810 | ) |
After 5 years | (447 | ) | (466 | ) |
(6,262 | ) | (6,361 | ) | |
Financial assets | ||||
Within 1 year, or on demand | 670 | 668 | ||
Between 1 and 2 years | 10 | 10 | ||
Between 2 and 3 years | 14 | 10 | ||
Between 3 and 4 years | 15 | 14 | ||
Between 4 and 5 years | 14 | 14 | ||
After 5 years | 87 | 168 | ||
Total per currency/interest rate analysis | (5,452 | ) | (5,477 | ) |
In addition, of
the remaining US$39 million net provision for the mark to market of the hedge
books held by companies acquired in 2000 and 2001, US$9 million matures in
2004, US$29 million in 2005 to 2008 and US$1 million thereafter. There are
other financial assets totalling US$145 million of which US$96 million have
no fixed maturity and US$49 million which has a maturity greater than one
year.
In accordance
with FRS 4, all commercial paper is classified as short term borrowings,
though of the US$1,687 million outstanding at 31 December 2003, US$1,100
million was backed by medium term facilities (2002: commercial paper of US$1,749
million all backed by medium term facilities). Under US and Australian GAAP,
the US$1,100 million would be grouped within non-current borrowings at 31
December 2003. Further details of available facilities are given below.
As at 31 December
2003, a total of US$1,618 million is outstanding under the US$3 billion European
Medium Term Notes facility, of which US$70 million is repayable within one
year. A US$600 million five year bond was issued in 2003 under the SEC shelf
registration.
At
31 December 2003, the Group had unutilised standby credit facilities totalling
US$2.75
billion. These facilities, which are summarised below, are for back-up support
for the Groups commercial paper programmes and for general corporate
purposes:
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Within 1 year | 1,650 | 1,050 | ||
Between 1 and 2 years | - | 1,650 | ||
After 2 years | 1,100 | 100 | ||
2,750 | 2,800 | |||
A-43
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
28 Financial Instruments (continued)
E) Fair
values of financial instruments
The carrying values
and the fair values of Rio Tinto's financial instruments at 31 December are
shown in the following table. Fair value is the amount at which a financial
instrument could be exchanged in an arm's length transaction between informed
and willing parties. Where available, market values have been used to determine
fair values. In other cases, fair values have been calculated using quotations
from independent financial institutions, or by discounting expected cash
flows at prevailing market rates. The fair value of cash, short term borrowings
and loans to joint ventures and associates approximates to the carrying value,
as a result of their short maturity, or because they carry floating rates
of interest.
If Rio Tinto's financial instruments were realised at the fair values shown, tax of US$86 million would become payable (2002: US$37 million recoverable). The maturity of the financial instruments is shown in the notes above.
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
US$m | Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||
value | value | value | value | ||||||
Primary financial instruments held or issued to | |||||||||
finance the Group's operations: | |||||||||
Cash (note 17) | 395 | 395 | 325 | 325 | |||||
Current asset investments (note 17) | 230 | 229 | 306 | 310 | |||||
Short term borrowings (note 18) | (2,199 | ) | (2,199 | ) | (3,370 | ) | (3,387 | ) | |
Medium and long term borrowings (note 22) | (4,231 | ) | (4,343 | ) | (2,856 | ) | (2,986 | ) | |
Loans to joint ventures and associates (note 13) | 174 | 174 | 253 | 253 | |||||
Other (liabilities)/assets | (63 | ) | (63 | ) | (165 | ) | (165 | ) | |
(5,694 | ) | (5,807 | ) | (5,507 | ) | (5,650 | ) | ||
Derivative financial instruments held to manage | |||||||||
the interest rate and currency profile: | |||||||||
Currency forward contracts hedging trading transactions (A) | (22 | ) | 207 | (20 | ) | (115 | ) | ||
Currency option contracts hedging trading transactions (A) | (27 | ) | 10 | (43 | ) | (82 | ) | ||
Currency forward contracts hedging future capital expenditure (A) | - | 93 | - | 62 | |||||
Currency swaps hedging non US dollar debt (A) | 387 | 387 | 152 | 152 | |||||
Interest rate swap agreements and options (B) | - | 68 | - | 94 | |||||
Commodity forward/future contracts hedging trading transactions (C) | 2 | (20 | ) | 3 | 6 | ||||
(5,354 | ) | (5,062 | ) | (5,415 | ) | (5,533 | ) | ||
Less: mark to market provision at acquisition/other provisions | 47 | 60 | |||||||
Other financial assets | (145 | ) | (122 | ) | |||||
Total per liquidity analysis | (5,452 | ) | (5,477 | ) | |||||
Gains and
losses on hedges
Changes in the
fair value of derivatives used as hedges of trading transactions, capital
expenditure and interest rate exposures, including changes relating to derivatives
held by companies acquired during 2000 and 2001, are not recognised in the
financial statements until the hedged position matures.
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Total net | Total net | ||||||||
US$m | gains/ | gains/ | |||||||
Gains | Losses | (losses) | (losses) | ||||||
Unrecognised gains and losses on hedges at 1 January | 202 | (177 | ) | 25 | (349 | ) | |||
Gains and losses arising in previous years recognised in the year | (61 | ) | 26 | (35 | ) | 88 | |||
Gains and losses arising before 1 January that were not recognised in the year | 141 | (151 | ) | (10 | ) | (261 | ) | ||
Gains and losses arising in the year that were not recognised in the year | 330 | 85 | 415 | 286 | |||||
Unrecognised gains and losses on hedges at 31 December | 471 | (66 | ) | 405 | 25 | ||||
Of which: | |||||||||
Gains and losses expected to be recognised within one year | 161 | (18 | ) | 143 | 35 | ||||
Gains and losses expected to be recognised in more than one year | 310 | (48 | ) | 262 | (10 | ) | |||
471 | (66 | ) | 405 | 25 | |||||
A-44
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
29 Contingent liabilities and commitments
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Commitments | ||||||||||||
Contracted capital expenditure at 31 December | 56 | 68 | 556 | 282 | 612 | 350 | ||||||
Operating lease commitments | 35 | 13 | 96 | 89 | 131 | 102 | ||||||
Other commitments | - | - | 67 | 51 | 67 | 51 |
Included above are operating lease commitments falling due within one year of US$38 million (2002: US$26 million).
Unconditional
purchase obligations
The aggregate
amount of future payment commitments under unconditional purchase obligations
outstanding at 31 December was:
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Within 1 year | 38 | 38 | 230 | 171 | 268 | 209 | ||||||
Between 1 and 2 years | 38 | 38 | 240 | 175 | 278 | 213 | ||||||
Between 2 and 3 years | 38 | 38 | 237 | 177 | 275 | 215 | ||||||
Between 3 and 4 years | 8 | 8 | 235 | 179 | 243 | 187 | ||||||
Between 4 and 5 years | 8 | 8 | 226 | 185 | 234 | 193 | ||||||
After 5 years | 56 | 64 | 1,656 | 1,458 | 1,712 | 1,522 | ||||||
186 | 194 | 2,824 | 2,345 | 3,010 | 2,539 | |||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Contingent liabilities | ||||||||||||
Indemnities and other performance guarantees on | ||||||||||||
which no material loss is expected | - | 16 | 266 | 129 | 266 | 145 |
(a) | Pursuant to the DLC merger both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited issued deed poll guarantees by which each guaranteed contractual obligations incurred by the other or, to the extent guaranteed by the other, any person. The amounts shown above for Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited do not reflect these deed poll guarantees. |
(b) | In 2002, the Australian Tax Office issued assessments of approximately A$500 million (which amount includes penalties and interest) in relation to certain transactions undertaken in 1997 to acquire franking credits. The transactions were conducted based on the Groups considered view of the law prevailing at the time. Subsequently, the law was changed. The Group lodged objections to the assessments and on 26 May 2003 the Australian Tax Office (ATO) substantially disallowed those objections. The Group subsequently lodged proceedings in the Federal Court to dispute the assessments. As required by Australian tax law and practice, part payment of the disputed tax assessments was required pending resolution of the dispute. A payment of A$164 million was made, which will be subject to recovery with interest if, as it is believed based on Counsels opinion, the Group is successful in challenging the assessments. Consequently, the amount paid has been recorded as a receivable on the balance sheet (see Note 16). As at the year end, the amount of the disputed tax assessments, penalties and interest stood at approximately A$454 million (US$340 million at the year end exchange rate) after tax relief on the general interest charge component. |
(c) | There are a number of legal claims arising from the normal course of business which are currently outstanding against the Group. No material loss to the Group is expected to result from these claims. |
A-45
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
30 Average number of employees
Subsidiaries and joint arrangements (a) | ||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||
The principal locations of employment were : | ||||||
Australia and New Zealand | 9,274 | 8,721 | 8,876 | |||
North America | 8,478 | 8,906 | 9,143 | |||
Africa | 5,661 | 6,012 | 6,273 | |||
Europe | 3,059 | 2,765 | 2,864 | |||
South America | 1,794 | 1,708 | 1,614 | |||
Indonesia | 569 | 908 | 1,065 | |||
Other countries | 205 | 150 | 188 | |||
29,040 | 29,170 | 30,023 | ||||
Joint ventures and associates (a) | ||||||
(Rio Tinto share) | ||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||
The principal locations of employment were : | restated | restated | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 983 | 995 | 881 | |||
North America | 1,034 | 873 | 922 | |||
Africa | 422 | 450 | 468 | |||
Europe | 386 | 433 | 473 | |||
South America | 773 | 940 | 823 | |||
Indonesia | 3,234 | 4,154 | 4,119 | |||
Other countries | 144 | 158 | 155 | |||
6,976 | 8,003 | 7,841 | ||||
Group total | ||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||
The principal locations of employment were : | restated | restated | ||||
Australia and New Zealand | 10,257 | 9,716 | 9,757 | |||
North America | 9,512 | 9,779 | 10,065 | |||
Africa | 6,083 | 6,462 | 6,741 | |||
Europe | 3,445 | 3,198 | 3,337 | |||
South America | 2,567 | 2,648 | 2,437 | |||
Indonesia | 3,803 | 5,062 | 5,184 | |||
Other countries | 349 | 308 | 343 | |||
36,016 | 37,173 | 37,864 | ||||
(a) | Employee numbers, which represent the average for the year, include 100 per cent of employees of subsidiary companies. Employee numbers for joint arrangements, joint ventures and associates are proportional to the Group's equity interest. |
(b) | Part-time employees are included on a full time equivalent basis. Temporary employees are included in employee numbers. |
(c) | People employed by contractors are not included. |
A-46
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
31 Principal subsidiaries at 31 December 2003
Class of | Proportion | Group | Ultimate | ||||||
Company and country | shares | of class | interest | parent | |||||
of incorporation | Principal activities | held | held % | % | company | ||||
Australia | |||||||||
Argyle Diamond Mines (g) | Mining and processing of diamonds | (g) | 100 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||
Coal & Allied Industries Limited | Coal mining | Ordinary | 75.71 | 75.71 | Rio Tinto Limited | ||||
Comalco Limited | Bauxite mining; alumina production; | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | Rio Tinto Limited | ||||
primary aluminium smelting | |||||||||
Dampier Salt Limited | Salt production | Ordinary | 64.94 | 64.94 | Rio Tinto Limited | ||||
Energy Resources of Australia Ltd | Uranium mining | Class A | 68.39 | 68.39 | Rio Tinto Limited | ||||
Hamersley Iron Pty Limited | Iron ore mining | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | Rio Tinto Limited | ||||
Rio Tinto Coal Australia Pty Limited | Coal mining | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | Rio Tinto Limited | ||||
Brazil | |||||||||
Rio Paracatu Mineracao S.A. | Gold mining | Common | 51 | 51 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
Mineracao Serra da Fortaleza | Nickel mining | Common | 99.9 | 99.9 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
Limitada | |||||||||
Canada | |||||||||
Iron Ore of Company of Canada Inc (c) | Iron ore mining; iron ore pellets | Series A & E | 58.72 | 58.72 | Rio Tinto Limited | ||||
QIT-Fer et Titane Inc | Titanium dioxide feedstock; high | Common shares | 100 | 100 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
purity iron and steel | Preferred shares | 100 | 100 | ||||||
France | |||||||||
Talc de Luzenac S.A. | Mining, refining and marketing of talc | E15.25 | 99.94 | 99.94 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
Indonesia | |||||||||
P.T. Kelian Equatorial Mining | Gold mining | Ordinary US$1 | 90 | 90 | Rio Tinto Limited | ||||
Namibia | |||||||||
Rossing Uranium Limited (d) | Uranium mining | 'B'N$1 | 71.16 | } | 68.58 | Rio Tinto plc | |||
'C'N10c | 70.59 | ||||||||
Papua New Guinea | |||||||||
Bougainville Copper Limited (e) | Copper and gold mining | Ordinary 1 Kina | 53.58 | 53.58 | Rio Tinto Limited | ||||
South Africa | |||||||||
Palabora Mining Company Limited | Copper mining, smelting and refining | R1 | 75.2 | 49.2 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
Richards Bay Iron and Titanium | Titanium dioxide feedstock; | R1 | 50.5 | 50 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
(Pty) Limited | high purity iron | ||||||||
Sweden | |||||||||
Zinkgruvan AB | Zinc, lead and silver mining | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | Rio Tinto Limited | ||||
United Kingdom | |||||||||
Anglesey Aluminium Metal Limited | Aluminium smelting | Ordinary £1 | 51 | 51 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
United States of America | |||||||||
Kennecott Holdings Corporation | Copper and gold mining, smelting | Common US$0.01 | 100 | 100 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
(including Kennecott Utah Copper, | and refining, land development | ||||||||
Kennecott Minerals and Kennecott | |||||||||
Land Company) | |||||||||
Kennecott Energy & Coal Company | Coal mining | Common US$1 | 100 | 100 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
U.S. Borax Inc. | Mining, refining and marketing of borates | Common US$1 | 100 | 100 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
Zimbabwe | |||||||||
Rio Tinto Zimbabwe Limited | Gold mining and metal refining | Ordinary Z40c | 56.04 | 56.04 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||
(a) | The Group comprises a large number of companies and it is not practical to include all of them in this list. The list therefore only includes those companies that have a more significant impact on the profit or assets of the Group. |
(b) | All companies operate mainly in the countries in which they are incorporated. |
(c) | In addition, the Group holds 20.3 per cent of the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Income Fund which has a 15.1 per cent interest in the Iron Ore Company of Canada. |
(d) | The Group shareholding in Rossing Uranium Limited carries 35.54 per cent of the total voting rights. Rossing is consolidated by virtue of Board control. |
(e) | The results of Bougainville Copper Limited are not consolidated - refer to note 39. |
(f) | The Group's principal subsidiaries are held by intermediate holding companies and not directly by Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited. |
(g) | The entity marked (g) is unincorporated. |
A-47
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
32 Principal joint venture interests at 31 December 2003
Class of | Group | Ultimate | |||||||
Name and country | shares | interest | parent | ||||||
of incorporation/operation | Principal activities | held | % | company | |||||
Australia | |||||||||
Bengalla | Coal mining | (b) | 30.3 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||
Blair Athol Coal | Coal mining | (b) | 71.2 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||
Hail Creek | Coal mining | (b) | 92.0 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||
Kestrel | Coal mining | (b) | 80.0 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||
Mount Thorley | Coal mining | (b) | 60.6 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||
Warkworth | Coal mining | (b) | 42.1 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||
Chile | |||||||||
Minera Escondida Limitada | Copper mining and refining | 30 | Rio Tinto plc | ||||||
Indonesia | |||||||||
Grasberg expansion | Copper and gold mining | (b) | 40 | Rio Tinto plc | |||||
United States of America | |||||||||
Decker | Coal mining | (b) | 50.0 | Rio Tinto plc | |||||
Greens Creek | Silver, gold, zinc and lead mining | (b) | 70.3 | Rio Tinto plc | |||||
Rawhide | Gold mining | (b) | 51.0 | Rio Tinto plc | |||||
The Group has joint control of the above ventures and therefore includes them in its accounts using the gross equity accounting technique. |
33 Principal associates at 31 December 2003
Class of | Proportion | Group | Ultimate | ||||||||
Name and country | Number of shares | shares | of class | interest | parent | ||||||
of incorporation/operation | Principal activities | held by the Group | held | held % | % | company | |||||
Papua New Guinea | |||||||||||
Lihir Gold Limited (d) | Gold mining | 185,758,126 | Ordinary Kina 0.1 | 14.49 | 14.49 | Rio Tinto plc | |||||
Portugal | |||||||||||
Sociedade Mineira de Neves-Corvo S.A. | Copper mining | 7,178,500 | E5 | 49 | 49 | Rio Tinto plc | |||||
(Somincor) | |||||||||||
South Africa | |||||||||||
Tisand (Pty) Limited | Rutile and zircon mining | 7,353,675 | R1 | 49.5 | 50 | Rio Tinto plc | |||||
United States of America | |||||||||||
Cortez | Gold mining | (b) | 40.0 | Rio Tinto plc | |||||||
Freeport-McMoRan | Copper & gold mining | 23,931,100 | Class 'B' | 13.1 | 13.1 | Rio Tinto plc | |||||
Copper & Gold Inc. (d) | in Indonesia | Common US$ 0.10 | |||||||||
34 Principal joint arrangements at 31 December 2003
Class of | Proportion | Group | Ultimate | ||||||||
Name and country | Number of shares | shares | of class | interest | parent | ||||||
of incorporation/operation | Principal activities | held by the Group | held | held % | % | company | |||||
Australia | |||||||||||
Boyne Smelters Limited | Aluminium smelting | 153,679,560 | Ordinary | 59.4 | 59.4 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||
Gladstone Power Station | Power generation | (b) | 42.1 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||||
Northparkes Mine | Copper/gold mining and processing | (b) | 80 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||||
Queensland Alumina Limited | Alumina production | 854,078 | Ordinary | 38.6 | 38.6 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||
Robe River Iron Associates | Iron ore mining | (b) | 53 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||||
Hlsmelt Kwinana | Iron technology | (b) | 60 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||||
Bao-HI Ranges Joint Venture | Iron ore mining | (b) | 54 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||||
Canada | |||||||||||
Diavik | Mining and processing of diamonds | (b) | 60 | Rio Tinto plc | |||||||
New Zealand | |||||||||||
New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited | Aluminium smelting | 24,998,400 | Ordinary | 79.36 | 79.36 | Rio Tinto Limited | |||||
(a) | The Group comprises a large number of companies and it is not practical to include all of them in notes 32 to 34. The list therefore only includes those companies that have a more significant impact on the profit or assets of the Group. |
(b) | Those joint ventures, associates and joint arrangements marked (b) are unincorporated entities. |
(c) | All entities operate mainly in the countries in which they are incorporated except where stated. |
(d) | The Group continued to have significant influence over the activities of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. and Lihir Gold Limited during 2003, including Board representation; consequently the Group equity accounted for its interests in these companies. |
(e) | The Group's principal joint ventures, associates and joint arrangements are held by intermediate holding companies and not directly by Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited. |
A-48
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
35 Purchases and sales of subsidiaries, joint arrangements, joint ventures and associates
Disposals
The Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group disposed
of its 25 per cent interest in Minera Alumbrera Limited, Argentina and the
wholly owned Peak Gold, Australia during March 2003; and its 50 per cent
interest in Kaltim Prima Coal, Indonesia during October 2003. The profit
on disposal of these businesses was US$126 million; this has been classified
as an exceptional item and consequently excluded from adjusted earnings within
the profit and loss account. The entire sale proceeds of US$403 million have
been included within the cash flow statement within 'Sales of subsidiaries,
joint ventures and associates'.
In 2002, total disposal proceeds for the sale of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates were US$233 million. The Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group disposed of the Moura joint venture and Ravensworth and Narama thermal coal complex which were acquired with the Australian coal operations of the Peabody Group in 2001.
Acquisitions
During 2003 Kennecott Energy, an indirect
subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc, increased its holding in Pegasus Technologies
Inc. from 20 per cent to 86 per cent. The transaction gave rise to goodwill
of US$20 million. The transaction did not involve any cash consideration.
On 6 June 2002, the Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group acquired an additional 9.5 per cent interest in reduction lines 1 and 2 at Boyne Smelters at a cost of US$78 million. The Group also increased its interest in Coal & Allied from 72.71 to 75.71 per cent on 17 September 2002, for a consideration of US$29 million. On 20 December 2002, the Group contributed additional equity to IOC, increasing its shareholding from 56.1 to 58.7 per cent.
35 (a) Post balance sheet
events (unaudited)
On 22 March 2004, Rio Tinto announced that
it had reached agreement with Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc ("FCX")
for FCX to acquire for cash all of Rio Tinto's 23,931,100 FCX shares. Futher
information regarding this transaction, which is subject to a number of conditions,
is set out in item 8 of Form 20-F. The sale of FCX shares does not affect
the terms of Rio Tinto's joint venture interest in production from the Grasberg
mine which is managed by FCX.
36 Directors'
remuneration
Aggregate remuneration of the directors of
the parent Companies was as follows:
Rio Tinto Group | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||
US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | |||||
Emoluments | 9,571 | 9,541 | 8,402 | ||||
Long term incentive plans | 3,278 | 8,443 | 4,439 | ||||
12,849 | 17,984 | 12,841 | |||||
Pension contributions | 424 | 65 | 4 | ||||
Gains made on exercise of share options | 2,029 | 2,992 | 17 |
For 2003, a total of US$4,048,800 (2002: US$5,389,636) was attributable to the highest paid director in respect of the aggregate amounts disclosed in the above table, including gains made on exercise of share options. The accrued pension entitlement for the highest paid director was US$1,158,700, (2002: US$984,000).
The aggregate remuneration, including pension contributions and other retirement benefits, incurred by Rio Tinto plc in respect of its directors was US$9,794,000 (2002: US$11,492,000). There were no pension contributions.
The aggregate remuneration, including pension contributions and other retirement benefits, incurred by Rio Tinto Limited in respect of its directors was US$5,508,000 (2002: US$6,557,000). The aggregate pension contribution was US$423,938 (2002: US$64,730).
During 2003, six directors (2002: seven) accrued retirement benefits under defined benefit arrangements.
Shares awarded last year in respect of the FTSE 1997 and MCCP 1999 performance period vested after the publication of the 2002 Annual Report and financial statements and the value of awards provided therein were estimated based on share prices of 1,169p and A$32.52. The actual share prices on 28 February 2003 when the awards vested were 1,268.5p and A$33.35 and the above 2003 figures for long term incentive plans have been adjusted accordingly. Further details are given in the Remuneration report on page 67 of the 2003 Annual report and financial statements.
Emoluments included in the table above have been translated from local currency at the average rate for the year with the exception of bonus payments, which, together with amounts payable under long term incentive plans for 2003, have been translated at the year end rate.
More detailed information concerning directors remuneration, shareholdings and options is shown in the Remuneration report, including Tables 1 to 6, on pages 65 to 69 of the Annual report and financial statements.
A-49
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
37 Auditors' remuneration
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
Auditors' remuneration - Group Auditors | ||||||||||||||||||
Audit services | ||||||||||||||||||
- Statutory audit | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 5.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | |||||||||
- Audit-related regulatory reporting | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | |||||||||
Further assurance services | 0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.1 | - | - | |||||||||
Tax services | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.8 | |||||||||
Other Services | ||||||||||||||||||
- Financial information technology | 0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.1 | - | - | |||||||||
- Internal audit | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | |||||||||
- Other services not covered above | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 2.6 | |||||||||
5.2 | 4.6 | 5.7 | 4.9 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 10.1 | 8.7 | 9.3 | ||||||||||
Remuneration payable to other accounting firms | ||||||||||||||||||
Statutory audit | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | |||||||||
Tax services | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Internal audit | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | |||||||||
Other Services | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 4.9 | 2.6 | 8.2 | 6.9 | 3.7 | 8.6 | |||||||||
3.8 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 8.3 | 4.0 | 10.0 | 12.1 | 5.8 | 11.0 | ||||||||||
9.0 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 13.2 | 8.1 | 13.6 | 22.2 | 14.5 | 20.3 | ||||||||||
(a) | The audit fees payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers, the Group Auditors, are reviewed by the Audit Committee. The committee sets the policy for regulating the award of non-audit work to the auditors and reviews the nature and extent of such work, and the amount of the related fees, to ensure that independence is maintained. The fees disclosed above consolidate all payments made to PricewaterhouseCoopers by the companies and their subsidiaries. |
(b) | Amounts payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers for non audit work for the Group's UK companies were US$1.3million (2002: US$0.9 million) and for the Group's Australian companies were US$2.3 million (2002: US$1.7 million). |
(c) | Remuneration payable to other accounting firms' does not include fees for similar services payable to other suppliers of consultancy services. |
(d) | Group Auditors' remuneration for tax services in 2003 comprise US$1.4 million in respect of compliance services and US$1.1 million in respect of advisory services. |
(e) | Internal audit fees payable to Group Auditors in 2003 relate to projects which were committed in 2002. The Group Auditors are no longer appointed to conduct internal audit work. |
A-50
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
38 Related party transactions
Information about material related party transactions of the Rio Tinto Group is set out below:
Subsidiary companies: Details of investments in principal subsidiary companies are disclosed in note 31.
Joint ventures and associates: Information relating to joint ventures and associates can be found in the following notes:
Note 4 - | Exceptional items |
Note 5 - | Net interest payable and similar charges |
Note 6 - | Amortisation of discount |
Note 7 - | Taxation charge for the year |
Note 12 - | Property, plant and equipment |
Note 13 - | Fixed asset investments |
Note 14 - | Net debt of joint ventures and associates |
Note 16 - | Accounts receivable and prepayments |
Note 19 - | Accounts payable and accruals |
Note 25 - | Share premium and reserves |
Note 26 - | Product analysis |
Note 27 - | Geographical analysis |
Note 30 - | Average number of employees |
Note 32 - | Principal joint venture interests |
Note 33 - | Principal associates |
Note 35 - | Purchases and sales of subsidiaries, joint arrangements, joint ventures and associates |
Information relating to joint arrangements can be found in note 34 - Principal joint arrangements.
Pension funds: Information relating to pension fund arrangements is disclosed in note 40.
Directors: Details of directors' remuneration are set out in note 36 and in the remuneration report on pages 60 to 69 of the 2003 Annual Report.
Leighton Holdings Limited (Leighton)
In 2001, John Morschel became a director
and, subsequently, the chairman of Leighton, Australia's largest project
development and contracting group. A number of Rio Tinto companies in Australia
and Indonesia have, in the ordinary course of their businesses, awarded commercial
contracts to subsidiaries of Leighton. The Board does not consider the value
of these contracts to be material to the business of either Leighton or the
Rio Tinto Group. On 22 December 2003, Leighton announced that Mr Morschel
would be resigning from the board of Leighton. Mr Morschel is expected to
resign by the end of March 2004.
Transactions between the Rio Tinto plc
part of the Group and the Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group
These are eliminated on the consolidation
of the Rio Tinto Group. Transactions during the year included the following:
- | During 2003, a subsidiary of the Rio Tinto plc part of the Group acquired US$500 million of redeemable preference shares in a subsidiary of the Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group. |
- | A payment of US$1,208 million (2002: US$115 million) was made by the Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group to the Rio Tinto plc part of the Group in respect of a number of shares which were bought back during 2000. |
- | During 2003 a dividend of US$164 million (2002: US$146 million) was paid by Rio Tinto Limited on the DLC Dividend Share, which was issued to facilitate the efficient management of funds within the DLC structure. Of this, US$62 million (2002: US$55 million) was paid out of Rio Tinto plc's 37.6% share of the reserves of Rio Tinto Limited and, therefore, had no impact on the shareholders' funds of Rio Tinto plc. The remaining US$102 million (2002: $91 million) of this dividend gave rise to an increase in the shareholders' funds of the Rio Tinto plc part of the Group. This dividend, however, had no impact on the shareholders' funds of the Rio Tinto Group as the economic interests of shareholders both of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited are in the combined net assets of the two dual listed companies. |
- | The ownership of Itallumina was transferred from a Rio Tinto Limited subsidiary to a Rio Tinto plc subsidiary during 2002 for a consideration of US$13 million. The Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group recognised a gain of US$5 million in respect of this disposal. |
39 Bougainville Copper Limited ('BCL')
The Panguna mine remains shut down. Access to the mine site has not been possible and an accurate assessment of the condition of the assets cannot be determined. Considerable funding would be required to recommence operations to the level which applied at the time of the mine's closure in 1989 and these funding requirements cannot be forecast accurately. The directors do not have access to reliable, verifiable or objective information on BCL and the directors have therefore decided to exclude BCL information from the financial statements. BCL reported a net profit of US$4 million for the financial year (2002: profit of US$2 million, 2001: profit of US$3 million). This is based upon actual transactions for the financial year. The aggregate amount of capital and reserves reported by BCL as at 31 December 2003 was US$97 million (2002: US$76 million). The Group owns 214,887,966 shares in BCL, representing 53.6 per cent of the issued share capital. The investment of US$195 million was fully provided against in 1991. At 31 December 2003, the market value of the shareholding in BCL was US$39 million.
A-51
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
40 Post retirement benefits
(a) SSAP 24 accounting and disclosure
Pensions
The Group operates a number of pension plans
around the world. Whilst some of these plans are defined contribution, the
majority are of the funded defined benefit type, with assets held in separate
trustee administered funds. Valuations of these plans are produced and updated
annually to 31 December by independent qualified actuaries. Further details
regarding the plans are provided in the FRS 17 disclosures in section (b) of
this note.
Summary of independent actuarial reviews | UK | Australia | US | Canada | Other (e) | |||||
At 31 December 2003 | ||||||||||
Assumptions | ||||||||||
Rate of return on investments (a) | 6.9 | % | 6.4 | % | 6.7 | % | 6.5 | % | 9.2 | % |
Rate of earnings growth, where appropriate (b) | 4.8 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 6.5 | % |
Rate of increase in pensions | 2.8 | % | 2.5 | % | - | - | 4.5 | % | ||
Results | ||||||||||
Smoothed market value of assets ($m) (c) | 1,506 | 962 | 573 | 673 | 194 | |||||
Percentage of coverage of liabilities by assets (d) | 124 | % | 100 | % | 81 | % | 80 | % | 91 | % |
Amount of deficit for individual plans with net deficits ($m) | 13 | 7 | 145 | 174 | 19 | |||||
At 31 December 2002 | ||||||||||
Assumptions | ||||||||||
Rate of return on investments (a) | 6.5 | % | 6.5 | % | 6.7 | % | 6.5 | % | 11.8 | % |
Rate of earnings growth, where appropriate (b) | 4.8 | % | 4.0 | % | 3.3 | % | 3.7 | % | 10.5 | % |
Rate of increase in pensions | 2.3 | % | 2.5 | % | - | - | 7.0 | % | ||
Results | ||||||||||
Smoothed market value of assets ($m) (c) | 1,358 | 600 | 551 | 538 | 202 | |||||
Percentage of coverage of liabilities by assets (d) | 129 | % | 103 | % | 81 | % | 82 | % | 141 | % |
Amount of deficit for individual plans with net deficits ($m) | 14 | - | 136 | 134 | - |
(a) | The rate of return on investments assumed for Australia is after tax. |
(b) | The rate of earnings growth assumed includes a promotional salary scale where appropriate. |
(c) | Assets were measured at market value smoothed over a one year period. |
(d) | Asset coverage of the liability is quoted after allowing for expected increases in earnings. |
(e) | The assumptions vary by location for the 'Other' plans. Assumptions shown are for Africa. |
Other information
A triennial actuarial valuation of the Group's
UK plan was made at 31 March 2003 using the projected unit method. In Australia,
whilst Group companies sponsor or subscribe to a number of pension plans,
the Rio Tinto Staff Superannuation Fund is the only significant plan. This
plan principally contains defined contribution liabilities but also has defined
benefit liabilities. Valuations are made at least every three years using
the projected unit method, with the latest valuation being as at 30 June
2003. A number of defined benefit pension plans are sponsored by the US entities,
typically with separate provision for salaried and hourly paid staff. Valuations
are made annually at 1 January using the projected unit method. A number
of defined benefit pension plans are sponsored by entities in Canada. Valuations
are updated annually using the projected unit method. Other defined benefit
plans sponsored by the Group around the world were assessed at various dates
during 2001, 2002 and 2003. The above summary is based on the most recent
valuation in each case, updated to the appropriate balance sheet date. The
expected average remaining service life in the major plans ranges from 10
to 17 years with an overall average of 12 years. The Group uses asset values
based on market value, but smoothed over a one year period in arriving at
its pension costs under SSAP 24. The main pension plans providing purely
defined contribution benefits held assets, equal to their liabilities, of
US$186 million as at 31 December 2003. The Group's contributions to these
plans, of US$9 million are charged against profits and are included in the
'Regular cost' shown below. The Group also operates a number of unfunded
plans, which are included within the deficit and percentage coverage statistics
above, measured on a basis consistent with both SSAP 24 and FRS 17.
Profit and loss account - effect of pension costs, pre-tax and minorities
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Regular cost | (102 | ) | (98 | ) |
Variation cost | (90 | ) | (2 | ) |
Interest on prepayment under SSAP 24 | 42 | 46 | ||
Net post retirement cost | (150 | ) | (54 | ) |
The variation cost reflects the amortisation of the excess of the pension asset carried in the balance sheet at the beginning of the year over the surplus/(deficit) in the relevant plans calculated on a SSAP 24 valuation basis. The increase in the variation cost in 2003 reflects the reduced surpluses/(increased deficits) of the plans at 1 January 2003 compared to 1 January 2002.
A-52
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
40 Post retirement benefits (continued)
Balance sheet - effect of pension assets and liabilities, pre-tax and minorities
2003
|
2002
|
|||
US$m
|
US$m
|
|||
Prepayment under SSAP 24 | 620 | 634 | ||
Provisions | (77 | ) | (44 | ) |
Net post retirement asset | 543 | 590 | ||
Post retirement healthcare
Certain subsidiaries of the Group, mainly
in the US, provide health and life insurance benefits to retired employees and
in some cases their beneficiaries and covered dependants. Eligibility for cover
is dependent upon certain age and service criteria.
These arrangements are unfunded.
On 30 September 2003, the unfunded accumulated post retirement benefit obligation and annual cost of accrual of benefits were determined by independent actuaries using the projected unit method. The main financial assumptions were: discount rate 6.1 per cent (at 30 September 2002: 6.5 per cent), Medical Trend Rate 11.2 per cent reducing to 4.7 per cent by the year 2011 (at 30 September 2002 initially 8.0 per cent reducing to 5.0 per cent by the year 2009), claims cost based on individual company experience. The assumptions were consistent with those adopted for determining pension costs. At 30 September 2003, which is the measurement date, the unfunded accumulated post retirement benefits obligation (excluding associates and joint ventures) was US$563 million (at 30 September 2002: US$437 million).
Profit and loss account - effect of post retirement healthcare costs, pre-tax and minorities
2003
|
2002
|
|||
US$m
|
US$m
|
|||
Regular cost | (9 | ) | (8 | ) |
Amortisation | 4 | 6 | ||
Interest | (29 | ) | (23 | ) |
Net post retirement (cost)/credit | (34 | ) | (25 | ) |
Balance sheet - effect of post retirement healthcare liabilities, pre-tax and minorities | ||||
Provisions | (498 | ) | (466 | ) |
b) FRS 17 Transitional disclosures
FRS 17 - 'Retirement Benefits', which deals with accounting for post retirement benefits, has not been adopted, but additional disclosures are required which are shown below. The standard requires pension deficits, and surpluses to the extent that they are considered recoverable, to be recognised in full. Annual service cost and net financial income on the assets and liabilities of the plans are recognised through earnings. Other fluctuations in the value of the surpluses/deficits are recognised in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses ('STRGL'). Details of post retirement benefit plan assets and liabilities at 31 December 2003, 2002 and 2001, valued on a projected unit basis in accordance with FRS 17, are set out below:
Other
|
||||||||||
(mainly
|
||||||||||
Main assumptions for FRS 17 purposes | UK
|
Australia
|
US
|
Canada
|
Africa)
|
|||||
At 31 December 2003 | ||||||||||
Rate of increase in salaries | 4.8 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 6.5 | % |
Rate of increase in pensions | 2.8 | % | 2.5 | % | - | - | 4.5 | % | ||
Discount rate | 5.4 | % | 6.0 | % | 5.9 | % | 6.1 | % | 9.0 | % |
Inflation | 2.8 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.3 | % | 4.5 | % |
At 31 December 2002 | ||||||||||
Rate of increase in salaries | 4.8 | % | 4.0 | % | 3.2 | % | 3.7 | % | 10.5 | % |
Rate of increase in pensions | 2.3 | % | 2.5 | % | - | - | 7.0 | % | ||
Discount rate | 5.6 | % | 6.2 | % | 6.2 | % | 6.5 | % | 11.5 | % |
Inflation | 2.3 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.2 | % | 2.2 | % | 7.0 | % |
At 31 December 2001 | ||||||||||
Rate of increase in salaries | 5.5 | % | 4.0 | % | 3.5 | % | 4.0 | % | 10.5 | % |
Rate of increase in pensions | 2.5 | % | 2.5 | % | - | - | 5.8 | % | ||
Discount rate | 6.0 | % | 6.5 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.0 | % | 11.5 | % |
Inflation | 2.5 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.5 | % | 5.8 | % |
The main financial assumptions used for the health care schemes, which are predominantly in the US, were: discount rate: 5.9% (2002: 6.2%, 2001: 7%), Medical Trend rate: 11.5% reducing to 5.0% by the year 2011 (2002: Medical Trend rate: 8% reducing to 5% by the year 2009, 2001: Medical Trend Rate 8.5% reducing to 5% by the year 2009), claims cost based on individual company experience.
A-53
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
40 Post retirement benefits (continued)
`
|
Other
|
|||||||||||
(mainly
|
||||||||||||
UK
|
Australia
|
US
|
Canada
|
Africa)
|
||||||||
Long term rate of return expected at 31 December 2003 | ||||||||||||
Equities | 7.8 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.5 | % | 7.3 | % | 9.5 | % | ||
Fixed interest bonds | 5.0 | % | 5.1 | % | 5.4 | % | 5.2 | % | 8.5 | % | ||
Index linked bonds | 5.0 | % | 5.1 | % | 5.4 | % | 5.2 | % | 8.5 | % | ||
Other | 4.6 | % | 5.1 | % | 5.1 | % | 3.3 | % | 5.6 | % | ||
Long term rate of return expected at 31 December 2002 | ||||||||||||
Equities | 7.3 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.2 | % | 7.2 | % | 12.5 | % | ||
Fixed interest bonds | 5.0 | % | 5.5 | % | 5.6 | % | 6.0 | % | 11.0 | % | ||
Index linked bonds | 5.0 | % | 5.5 | % | 5.6 | % | 6.0 | % | 11.0 | % | ||
Other | 4.6 | % | 5.9 | % | 6.4 | % | 5.0 | % | 10.2 | % | ||
Long term rate of return expected at 31 December 2001 | ||||||||||||
Equities | 7.5 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.5 | % | 7.5 | % | 12.5 | % | ||
Fixed interest bonds | 5.5 | % | 6.0 | % | 6.5 | % | 6.5 | % | 11.0 | % | ||
Index linked bonds | 5.5 | % | 6.0 | % | 6.5 | % | 6.5 | % | 11.0 | % | ||
Other | 5.3 | % | 6.3 | % | 6.8 | % | 5.1 | % | 9.7 | % |
Scheme assets | ||||||||||||
The assets in the pension plans and the contributions made were: | ||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||
(mainly
|
||||||||||||
UK
|
Australia
|
US
|
Canada
|
Africa)
|
Total
|
|||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
Value at 31 December 2003 | ||||||||||||
Equities | 1,094 | 646 | 401 | 451 | 82 | 2,674 | ||||||
Fixed interest bonds | 300 | 229 | 126 | 193 | 15 | 863 | ||||||
Index linked bonds | 127 | 7 | 12 | 44 | - | 190 | ||||||
Other | 54 | 88 | 74 | 21 | 97 | 334 | ||||||
1,575 | 970 | 613 | 709 | 194 | 4,061 | |||||||
Value at 31 December 2002 | ||||||||||||
Equities | 823 | 377 | 342 | 271 | 93 | 1,906 | ||||||
Fixed interest bonds | 294 | 160 | 139 | 148 | 18 | 759 | ||||||
Index linked bonds | 95 | 5 | 11 | 32 | - | 143 | ||||||
Other | 60 | 65 | 39 | 64 | 190 | 418 | ||||||
1,272 | 607 | 531 | 515 | 301 | 3,226 | |||||||
Value at 31 December 2001 | ||||||||||||
Equities | 965 | 416 | 441 | 375 | 161 | 2,358 | ||||||
Fixed interest bonds | 244 | 132 | 122 | 153 | 45 | 696 | ||||||
Index linked bonds | 81 | 5 | 13 | 36 | - | 135 | ||||||
Other | 66 | 64 | 56 | 17 | 30 | 233 | ||||||
1,356 | 617 | 632 | 581 | 236 | 3,422 | |||||||
Employer contributions made during 2003 * | 6 | 45 | 4 | 43 | 5 | 103 | ||||||
Employer contributions made during 2002 * | - | 10 | 4 | 15 | 4 | 33 | ||||||
*The contributions shown include US$9 million (2002: US$13 million) for defined contribution plans.
In addition, there were contributions of
US$18 million (2002: US$16 million) in respect of unfunded health care schemes
in the year. Since these schemes are unfunded, contributions for future years
will be equal to benefit payments and therefore cannot be pre-determined.
In relation to pensions, it is currently
expected that there will be no regular employer or employee contributions to
the UK plan in 2004. Contributions are made to the main Australian plan according
to the recommendation of the plan actuary and are primarily to a mixed defined
benefit/defined contribution type arrangement (included in the above figures).
In North America, contributions are agreed annually in nominal terms. Additional
contributions will be paid in 2004 in the light of the position in the US and
Canadian plans. Whilst contributions for 2004 are yet to be determined, the currently
expected level of contributions by the Group to the plans in Australia, Canada
and the US is expected to be some US$30-40 million higher than in 2003.
The most recent full valuation of the
UK plans was at 31 March 2003. The most recent full valuation of the Australian
plans was at 30 June 2003.
For both the US and Canadian major plans, the most recent full valuation was
at 1 January 2003.
A-54
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
40 Post retirement benefits (continued)
Surpluses/(deficits) in the plans
The following amounts were measured in
accordance with FRS 17:
At 31 December 2003 | UK
|
Australia
|
US
|
Canada
|
Other
|
Healthcare
|
Total
|
|||||||
US$m
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
||||||||
Total market value of plan assets | 1,575 | 970 | 613 | 709 | 194 | - | 4,061 | |||||||
Present value of plan liabilities | (1,477 | ) | (963 | ) | (768 | ) | (877 | ) | (213 | ) | (561 | ) | (4,859 | ) |
Surplus/(deficit) in the plans | 98 | 7 | (155 | ) | (168 | ) | (19 | ) | (561 | ) | (798 | ) | ||
Related deferred tax | 123 | |||||||||||||
Related outside shareholders' interest | 92 | |||||||||||||
Net post retirement liability | (583 | ) | ||||||||||||
Surplus/(deficit) in the plans comprises: | ||||||||||||||
Surplus | 121 | 7 | 12 | 2 | - | - | 142 | |||||||
Deficit | (23 | ) | - | (167 | ) | (170 | ) | (19 | ) | (561 | ) | (940 | ) | |
98 | 7 | (155 | ) | (168 | ) | (19 | ) | (561 | ) | (798 | ) | |||
At 31 December 2002 | UK
|
Australia
|
US
|
Canada
|
Other
|
Healthcare
|
Total
|
|||||||
US$m
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
||||||||
Total market value of plan assets | 1,272 | 607 | 531 | 515 | 301 | - | 3,226 | |||||||
Present value of plan liabilities | (1,178 | ) | (594 | ) | (721 | ) | (670 | ) | (312 | ) | (417 | ) | (3,892 | ) |
Surplus/(deficit) in the plans | 94 | 13 | (190 | ) | (155 | ) | (11 | ) | (417 | ) | (666 | ) | ||
Related deferred tax | 113 | |||||||||||||
Related outside shareholders' interest | 47 | |||||||||||||
Net post retirement liability | (506 | ) | ||||||||||||
Surplus/(deficit) in the plans comprises: | ||||||||||||||
Surplus | 108 | 13 | 45 | 2 | - | - | 168 | |||||||
Deficit | (14 | ) | - | (235 | ) | (157 | ) | (11 | ) | (417 | ) | (834 | ) | |
94 | 13 | (190 | ) | (155 | ) | (11 | ) | (417 | ) | (666 | ) | |||
If the above amounts had been recognised in the financial statements, the Group's shareholders' funds at 31 December would have been as follows:
2003
|
2002
|
|||
US$m
|
US$m
|
|||
Shareholders' funds including SSAP 24 post retirement net asset | 10,037 | 7,462 | ||
Deduct: SSAP 24 post retirement net asset | 67 | 96 | ||
Shareholders' funds excluding SSAP 24 post retirement net asset | 9,970 | 7,366 | ||
Add: FRS 17 post retirement net liability | (583 | ) | (506 | ) |
Shareholders' funds including FRS 17 post retirement net liability | 9,387 | 6,860 | ||
Movements in surplus/(deficit) during the
year
The net post retirement deficit
under FRS 17 before defered tax and outside shareholders interests would
have moved as follows during 2003:
2003
|
2002
|
|||||||
Other
|
Total
|
Total
|
||||||
Pension
|
benefits
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
|||||
Net post retirement (deficit)/surplus at 1 January | (249 | ) | (417 | ) | (666 | ) | 78 | |
Movement in year: | ||||||||
Currency translation adjustment | (21 | ) | (24 | ) | (45 | ) | 19 | |
Total current service cost (employer and employee) | (140 | ) | (9 | ) | (149 | ) | (113 | ) |
Past service cost | (7 | ) | - | (7 | ) | (11 | ) | |
Curtailment and settlement loss (one-off costs associated with early retirements | ||||||||
on restructuring) | - | 3 | 3 | (2 | ) | |||
Plan amendments | (10 | ) | - | (10 | ) | - | ||
Other net finance (cost)/income | (2 | ) | (28 | ) | (30 | ) | 23 | |
Contributions (including employee contributions) | 138 | 18 | 156 | 59 | ||||
Actuarial loss recognised in STRGL | 54 | (104 | ) | (50 | ) | (719 | ) | |
Net post retirement deficit at 31 December | (237 | ) | (561 | ) | (798 | ) | (666 | ) |
A-55
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
40 Post retirement benefits (continued)
Amounts which would have been recognised
in the profit and loss account and in the STRGL under FRS 17
The following amounts would have
been included within operating profit under FRS 17:
2003
|
2002
|
|||||||
Pension
|
Other
|
Total
|
Total
|
|||||
benefits
|
benefits
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
|||||
Employer current service cost | (110 | ) | (12 | ) | (122 | ) | (103 | ) |
Past service cost | (7 | ) | - | (7 | ) | (11 | ) | |
Curtailment and settlement cost | - | 3 | 3 | (2 | ) | |||
Total operating charge | (117 | ) | (9 | ) | (126 | ) | (116 | ) |
Employer contributions of US$9 million (2002: US$13 million) for defined contribution arrangements have been included in the above operating charge.
The following amounts would have been included as other net finance (expense)/income under FRS 17:
2003
|
2002
|
|||||||
Pension
|
Other
|
Total
|
Total
|
|||||
benefits
|
benefits
|
US$m
|
US$m
|
|||||
Expected return on pension scheme assets | 213 | - | 213 | 254 | ||||
Interest on post retirement liabilities | (215 | ) | (28 | ) | (243 | ) | (231 | ) |
Net return | (2 | ) | (28 | ) | (30 | ) | 23 | |
If the above amounts had been recognised in the financial statements instead of the SSAP24 charges, the Group's reported net earnings for 2003 would have increased by US$17 million (2002: decreased by US$15 million).
The following amounts would have been recognised within the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses ('STRGL') under FRS 17:
2003 | 2002 | |||
US$m | US$m | |||
Difference between the expected and actual return on plan assets: | ||||
Amount (US$m) | 354 | (599 | ) | |
As a percentage of plan assets | 9% | -19% | ||
Experience gains and losses on plan liabilities: | ||||
(i.e. variances between the actual estimate of liabilities and the subsequent outcome) | ||||
Amount (US$m) | (118 | ) | 28 | |
As a percentage of the present value of the plan liabilities | -2% | 1% | ||
Change in assumptions: | ||||
Amount (US$m) | (286 | ) | (148 | ) |
Total amount recognised in STRGL | ||||
Amount (US$m) | (50 | ) | (719 | ) |
As a percentage of the present value of the plan liabilities | -1% | -18% | ||
A-56
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
41 Rio Tinto financial information by business unit
Rio Tinto | Gross turnover (a) | EBITDA (b) | Net earnings (c) | |||||||||||||||||
interest | ||||||||||||||||||||
% | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||||
Iron Ore | ||||||||||||||||||||
Hamersley (inc. HIsmelt®) | 100.0 | 1,329 | 1,117 | 1,118 | 711 | 676 | 733 | 424 | 401 | 441 | ||||||||||
Robe River | 53.0 | 374 | 240 | 193 | 213 | 160 | 127 | 68 | 54 | 45 | ||||||||||
Iron Ore Company of Canada | 58.7 | 442 | 400 | 380 | 47 | 25 | 67 | 7 | (3 | ) | 16 | |||||||||
2,145 | 1,757 | 1,691 | 971 | 861 | 927 | 499 | 452 | 502 | ||||||||||||
Energy | ||||||||||||||||||||
Kennecott Energy | 100.0 | 955 | 949 | 882 | 236 | 267 | 223 | 88 | 90 | 84 | ||||||||||
Rio Tinto Coal Australia | 100.0 | 433 | 417 | 362 | 157 | 233 | 201 | 70 | 134 | 117 | ||||||||||
Kaltim Prima Coal | (d) | 142 | 216 | 212 | 74 | 79 | 101 | 31 | 26 | 42 | ||||||||||
Coal & Allied | 75.7 | 597 | 623 | 647 | 52 | 207 | 255 | (24 | ) | 68 | 102 | |||||||||
Rössing | 68.6 | 86 | 112 | 115 | (33 | ) | 50 | 68 | (19 | ) | 23 | 21 | ||||||||
Energy Resources of Australia | 68.4 | 131 | 113 | 90 | 58 | 50 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 7 | ||||||||||
2,344 | 2,430 | 2,308 | 544 | 886 | 886 | 157 | 353 | 373 | ||||||||||||
Industrial Minerals | 1,801 | 1,847 | 1,768 | 465 | 717 | 797 | 154 | 286 | 323 | |||||||||||
Aluminium | (e) | 1,936 | 1,662 | 1,714 | 488 | 510 | 632 | 200 | 256 | 328 | ||||||||||
Copper | ||||||||||||||||||||
Kennecott Utah Copper | 100.0 | 722 | 755 | 675 | 230 | 236 | 271 | 88 | 86 | 81 | ||||||||||
Escondida | 30.0 | 502 | 283 | 289 | 284 | 121 | 142 | 122 | 32 | 41 | ||||||||||
Freeport | 13.1 | 344 | 306 | 296 | 169 | 139 | 128 | 23 | 19 | 4 | ||||||||||
Freeport joint venture | 40.0 | 397 | 349 | 316 | 225 | 215 | 186 | 104 | 113 | 88 | ||||||||||
Palabora | 49.2 | 206 | 201 | 233 | 20 | 53 | 66 | 1 | 12 | 14 | ||||||||||
Kennecott Minerals | 100.0 | 239 | 205 | 196 | 122 | 93 | 83 | 60 | 38 | 33 | ||||||||||
Rio Tinto Brasil | (f) | 139 | 115 | 111 | 48 | 40 | 46 | 48 | 16 | 26 | ||||||||||
Other Copper | (d) | 176 | 254 | 268 | 51 | 100 | 116 | (6 | ) | 25 | 19 | |||||||||
2,725 | 2,468 | 2,384 | 1,149 | 997 | 1,038 | 440 | 341 | 306 | ||||||||||||
Diamonds | ||||||||||||||||||||
Argyle | 100.0 | 434 | 372 | 278 | 198 | 175 | 147 | 72 | 63 | 58 | ||||||||||
Diavik | 60.0 | 122 | - | - | 106 | - | - | 41 | - | - | ||||||||||
556 | 372 | 278 | 304 | 175 | 147 | 113 | 63 | 58 | ||||||||||||
Other Operations | 184 | 208 | 233 | 77 | 81 | 61 | 21 | 25 | 16 | |||||||||||
Product Group Total | 11,691 | 10,744 | 10,376 | 3,998 | 4,227 | 4,488 | 1,584 | 1,776 | 1,906 | |||||||||||
Other items | 64 | 84 | 62 | (233 | ) | (137 | ) | (50 | ) | (45 | ) | (42 | ) | 27 | ||||||
Exploration and evaluation | (127 | ) | (130 | ) | (130 | ) | (98 | ) | (109 | ) | (104 | ) | ||||||||
Net interest | (59 | ) | (95 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted earnings | 1,382 | 1,530 | 1,662 | |||||||||||||||||
Exceptional items | 126 | (116 | ) | - | 126 | (879 | ) | (583 | ) | |||||||||||
Total | 11,755 | 10,828 | 10,438 | 3,764 | 3,844 | 4,308 | 1,508 | 651 | 1,079 | |||||||||||
Depreciation & amortisation in subsidiaries | (1,006 | ) | (954 | ) | (929 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Asset write-downs relating to subsidiaries & joint ventures | - | (955 | ) | (701 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation & amortisation in joint ventures and associates | (366 | ) | (333 | ) | (291 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Profit on ordinary activities before interest and tax | 2,392 | 1,602 | 2,387 | |||||||||||||||||
(a) | Gross turnover includes 100 per cent of subsidiaries' turnover and the Group's share of the turnover of joint ventures and associates. |
(b) | EBITDA of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates represents profit before: tax, net interest payable, depreciation and amortisation. |
(c) | Net earnings represent after tax earnings attributable to the Rio Tinto Group. Earnings of subsidiaries are stated before interest charges but after the amortisation of the discount related to provisions. Earnings attributable to joint ventures and associates include interest charges. |
(d) | During 2003, Rio Tinto sold its interests in Kaltim Prima Coal, Alumbrera and Peak. |
(e) | Includes Rio Tinto's interest in Anglesey Aluminium (51 per cent) and Comalco (100 per cent). |
(f) | Includes Morro do Ouro in which Rio Tintos interest is 51 per cent and Fortaleza in which Rio Tinto's interest was 99.9 per cent at 31 December 2003. |
(g) | Business units have been classified above according to the Groups management structure. Generally, this structure has regard to the primary product of each business unit but there are exceptions. For example, the Copper group includes certain gold operations. This summary differs, therefore, from the Product Analysis in which the contributions of individual business units are attributed to several products as appropriate. |
(h) | The Product group previously known as 'Diamonds and Gold' has been redesignated the 'Diamonds' group, with effect from 1 January 2003. Kennecott Minerals and Rio Tinto Brasil are now included in the 'Copper' group. Kelian, Lihir, and Rio Tinto Zimbabwe are included in 'Other Operations'. In addition Rio Tinto Aluminium has been transferred from 'Copper' to 'Aluminium'. |
(i) | From 1 January 2003 the way in which post retirement costs are attributed to business units , and consequently Product groups, has been revised. The regular cost component of post retirement costs is included in business unit earnings and the balance of post retirement cost is recognised centrally in other items. The analyses of 2002 Net earnings, EBITDA and Operating assets have been restated to reflect this allocation. There is no impact on Net earnings or Operating assets for the Group. The analyses of 2001 Net earnings, EBITDA and Operating assets have not been restated. |
A - 57
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
41 Rio Tinto financial information by business unit (continued)
Capital
expenditure (j)
|
Depreciation & amortisation
(k)
|
Operating
assets (l)
|
Employees
(m)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||||||||
Iron Ore | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hamersley (inc. HIsmelt®) | 298 | 79 | 58 | 110 | 94 | 90 | 1,543 | 923 | 762 | 2,169 | 2,006 | 2,070 | ||||||||||||
Robe River | 75 | 81 | 203 | 74 | 50 | 37 | 1,852 | 1,409 | 1,221 | 478 | 496 | 449 | ||||||||||||
Iron Ore Company of Canada | 37 | 39 | 242 | 29 | 35 | 36 | 489 | 416 | 612 | 1,884 | 1,936 | 2,099 | ||||||||||||
410 | 199 | 503 | 213 | 179 | 163 | 3,884 | 2,748 | 2,595 | 4,531 | 4,438 | 4,618 | |||||||||||||
Energy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kennecott Energy | 168 | 152 | 54 | 105 | 128 | 110 | 561 | 486 | 439 | 1,776 | 1,710 | 1,656 | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Coal Australia | 92 | 126 | 20 | 52 | 37 | 31 | 649 | 406 | 275 | 755 | 679 | 526 | ||||||||||||
Kaltim Prima Coal | 2 | 5 | 4 | 16 | 21 | 22 | - | 46 | 59 | 2,108 | 2,760 | 2,696 | ||||||||||||
Coal & Allied | 34 | 58 | 31 | 91 | 69 | 44 | 787 | 626 | 786 | 1,338 | 1,375 | 1,379 | ||||||||||||
Rössing | 4 | 5 | (1 | ) | 7 | 5 | 5 | 46 | 48 | 25 | 810 | 786 | 794 | |||||||||||
Energy Resources of Australia | 5 | 4 | 2 | 30 | 23 | 22 | 178 | 140 | 165 | 238 | 262 | 232 | ||||||||||||
305 | 350 | 110 | 301 | 283 | 234 | 2,221 | 1,752 | 1,749 | 7,025 | 7,572 | 7,283 | |||||||||||||
Industrial Minerals | 139 | 133 | 146 | 172 | 158 | 144 | 2,038 | 2,063 | 2,046 | 6,581 | 6,723 | 7,079 | ||||||||||||
Aluminium | 436 | 269 | 103 | 169 | 137 | 123 | 3,258 | 2,365 | 1,921 | 4,223 | 3,929 | 3,972 | ||||||||||||
Copper | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kennecott Utah Copper | 83 | 97 | 115 | 92 | 129 | 167 | 1,277 | 1,378 | 1,838 | 1,406 | 1,596 | 1,926 | ||||||||||||
Escondida | 45 | 117 | 188 | 79 | 52 | 52 | 492 | 449 | 447 | 722 | 704 | 623 | ||||||||||||
Freeport | 33 | 23 | 25 | 54 | 50 | 54 | 144 | 128 | 109 | 1,165 | 1,445 | 1,475 | ||||||||||||
Freeport joint venture | 60 | 55 | 57 | 43 | 40 | 35 | 417 | 412 | 398 | |||||||||||||||
Palabora | 66 | 64 | 83 | 17 | 13 | 21 | 426 | 287 | 207 | 2,043 | 2,176 | 2,269 | ||||||||||||
Kennecott Minerals | 9 | 21 | 21 | 42 | 43 | 41 | 136 | 155 | 166 | 672 | 763 | 814 | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Brasil | 19 | 14 | 22 | (18 | ) | 11 | 11 | 138 | 91 | 119 | 1,393 | 1,320 | 1,181 | |||||||||||
Other Copper | 63 | 60 | 53 | 52 | 73 | 72 | 335 | 443 | 379 | 931 | 1,266 | 1,329 | ||||||||||||
378 | 451 | 564 | 361 | 411 | 453 | 3,365 | 3,343 | 3,663 | 8,332 | 9,270 | 9,617 | |||||||||||||
Diamonds | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Argyle | 22 | 31 | 52 | 76 | 76 | 55 | 600 | 488 | 493 | 750 | 751 | 794 | ||||||||||||
Diavik | 78 | 206 | 182 | 34 | - | - | 674 | 484 | 318 | 298 | 250 | 99 | ||||||||||||
100 | 237 | 234 | 110 | 76 | 55 | 1,274 | 972 | 811 | 1,048 | 1,001 | 893 | |||||||||||||
Other Operations | 4 | 6 | 13 | 37 | 36 | 38 | 98 | 114 | 168 | 2,228 | 2,789 | 2,984 | ||||||||||||
Product Group Total | 1,772 | 1,645 | 1,673 | 1,363 | 1,280 | 1,210 | 16,138 | 13,357 | 12,953 | 33,968 | 35,722 | 36,446 | ||||||||||||
Other items | 17 | 13 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 10 | (455 | ) | (148 | ) | (199 | ) | 2,048 | 1,451 | 1,418 | |||||||||
Less: Joint ventures and associates (j) (k) | (181 | ) | (241 | ) | (271 | ) | (366 | ) | (333 | ) | (291 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total | 1,608 | 1,417 | 1,405 | 1,006 | 954 | 929 | 15,683 | 13,209 | 12,754 | 36,016 | 37,173 | 37,864 | ||||||||||||
Less: net debt | (5,646 | ) | (5,747 | ) | (5,711 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets | 10,037 | 7,462 | 7,043 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(j) | Capital expenditure comprises the net cash outflow on purchases less disposals of property, plant and equipment. The details provided include 100 per cent of subsidiaries' capital expenditure and Rio Tinto's share of the capital expenditure of joint ventures and associates. Amounts relating to joint ventures and associates not specifically funded by Rio Tinto are deducted before arriving at total capital expenditure for the Group. |
(k) | Depreciation figures include 100 per cent of subsidiaries' depreciation and amortisation of goodwill and include Rio Tinto's share of the depreciation and goodwill amortisation of joint ventures and associates. Amounts relating to joint ventures and associates are deducted before arriving at the total depreciation charge. |
(l) | Operating assets of subsidiaries comprise net assets before deducting net debt, less outside shareholders' interests which are calculated by reference to the net assets of the relevant companies (ie net of such companies' debt). For joint ventures and associates, Rio Tinto's net investment is shown. For joint ventures and associates shown above, Rio Tinto's shares of operating assets, defined as for subsidiaries, are as follows: Escondida US$905 million (2002: US$913 million), Freeport joint venture US$417 million (2002: US$412 million), Freeport associate US$380 million (2002: US$533 million). |
(m) | Employee numbers, which represent the average for the year, include 100 per cent of employees of subsidiary companies. Employee numbers for joint arrangements, joint ventures and associates are proportional to the Group's equity interest. Part time employees are included on a full time equivalent basis and people employed by contractors are not included. Temporary employees are included in employee numbers. Figures for 2001 and 2002 have been restated. |
A - 58
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles
Reconciliation with US GAAP
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Restated | Restated | Restated | |||||||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||||||
Net earnings under UK GAAP | 956 | 195 | 491 | 884 | 736 | 942 | 1,508 | 651 | 1,079 | ||||||||||
Increase/(decrease) before tax in respect of: | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortisation
of goodwill - subsidiaries and joint arrangements |
34 | 52 | (88 | ) | 42 | 38 | (9 | ) | 76 | 90 | (97 | ) | |||||||
Amortisation
of goodwill - equity accounted companies
(excluding Rio Tinto Limited) |
- | - | (35 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (35 | ) | ||||||||
Amortisation
of intangibles - subsidiaries and joint arrangements |
(40 | ) | (59 | ) | - | - | - | - | (40 | ) | (59 | ) | - | ||||||
Amortisation
of intangibles - equity accounted companies
(excluding Rio Tinto Limited) |
(7 | ) | (9 | ) | - | - | - | - | (7 | ) | (9 | ) | - | ||||||
Exchange
differences included in earnings under US GAAP |
52 | (53 | ) | 9 | 967 | 293 | (225 | ) | 1,019 | 240 | (216 | ) | |||||||
Mark
to market of certain derivative contracts |
(24 | ) | 6 | (6 | ) | 311 | 151 | (42 | ) | 287 | 157 | (48 | ) | ||||||
Adjustments
to asset carrying values - subsidiaries and joint arrangements |
(32 | ) | (422 | ) | 571 | - | 420 | - | (32 | ) | (2 | ) | 571 | ||||||
Adjustments
to asset carrying values - equity accounted companies (excluding Rio
Tinto Limited) |
- | (87 | ) | (103 | ) | - | - | - | - | (87 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||||
Pensions/post
retirement benefits |
55 | 8 | (73 | ) | 4 | (7 | ) | - | 59 | 1 | (73 | ) | |||||||
Exploration
and evaluation |
(8 | ) | - | - | (16 | ) | (17 | ) | (83 | ) | (24 | ) | (17 | ) | (83 | ) | |||
Share
options |
(12 | ) | (12 | ) | (6 | ) | (9 | ) | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | (21 | ) | (17 | ) | (8 | ) | |
Effect
of historical average commodity prices in ore reserve determination |
(82 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (82 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Other |
(44 | ) | (29 | ) | 7 | (112 | ) | (52 | ) | (58 | ) | (156 | ) | (81 | ) | (51 | ) | ||
Taxation: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Tax
effect of the above adjustments |
16 | 11 | (51 | ) | (412 | ) | (125 | ) | 134 | (396 | ) | (114 | ) | 83 | |||||
Other
tax adjustments |
(12 | ) | (13 | ) | 3 | 7 | - | - | (5 | ) | (13 | ) | 3 | ||||||
Outside
shareholders' interests in the above adjustments |
8 | 6 | 2 | (39 | ) | (165 | ) | 14 | (31 | ) | (159 | ) | 16 | ||||||
Share
of US GAAP adjustments of Rio Tinto Limited |
279 | 200 | (103 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
Net
income/(loss) under US GAAP before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
1,139 | (206 | ) | 618 | 1,627 | 1,267 | 671 | 2,155 | 581 | 1,038 | |||||||||
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle for close down and restoration
costs |
(198 | ) | - | - | 20 | - | - | (178 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Share
of US GAAP adjustment of Rio Tinto Limited |
8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Net
income/(loss) under US GAAP |
949 | (206 | ) | 618 | 1,647 | 1,267 | 671 | 1,977 | 581 | 1,038 | |||||||||
Basic
earnings per ordinary share under US GAAP |
|||||||||||||||||||
Before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
106.8 | c | (19.3 | )c | 58.1 | c | 326.1 | c | 254.0 | c | 134.6 | c | 156.4 | c | 42.2 | c | 75.5 | c | |
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle |
(17.8 | )c | - | - | 4.0 | c | - | - | (12.9 | )c | - | - | |||||||
After
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
89.0 | c | (19.3 | )c | 58.1 | c | 330.1 | c | 254.0 | c | 134.6 | c | 143.5 | c | 42.2 | c | 75.5 | c | |
Diluted
earnings per ordinary shareunder
US GAAP |
|||||||||||||||||||
Before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
106.7 | c | (19.3 | )c | 58.0 | c | 326.0 | c | 253.7 | c | 134.5 | c | 156.2 | c | 42.1 | c | 75.4 | c | |
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle |
(17.8) | c | - | - | 4.0 | c | - | - | (12.9 | )c | - | - | |||||||
After
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
88.9 | c | (19.3 | )c | 58.0 | c | 330.0 | c | 253.7 | c | 134.5 | c | 143.3 | c | 42.1 | c | 75.4 | c | |
A-59
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued) | ||||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Restated | Restated | Restated | ||||||||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
Shareholders'
funds under UK GAAP (2001 as previously reported) |
7,343 | 5,899 | 6,039 | 4,324 | 2,510 | 1,822 | 10,037 | 7,462 | 7,176 | |||||||||
Prior year adjustment | - | - | (137 | ) | - | - | 6 | - | - | (133 | ) | |||||||
Shareholders'
funds under UK GAAP (as restated) |
7,343 | 5,899 | 5,902 | 4,324 | 2,510 | 1,828 | 10,037 | 7,462 | 7,043 | |||||||||
Increase/(decrease)
before tax in respect of: |
||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill
- subsidiaries and joint arrangements |
896 | 862 | 1,110 | 302 | 203 | 160 | 1,198 | 1,065 | 1,270 | |||||||||
Goodwill
- equity accounted companies (excluding Rio Tinto Limited) |
352 | 352 | 508 | - | - | - | 352 | 352 | 508 | |||||||||
Intangibles
- subsidiaries and joint arrangements |
240 | 271 | - | - | - | - | 240 | 271 | - | |||||||||
Intangibles
- equity accounted companies (excluding Rio Tinto Limited) |
42 | 49 | - | - | - | - | 42 | 49 | - | |||||||||
Mark
to market of certain derivative contracts |
(65 | ) | (10 | ) | (2 | ) | 446 | (44 | ) | (331 | ) | 381 | (54 | ) | (332 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to asset carrying values - subsidiaries and joint arrangements |
96 | 133 | 578 | 409 | 420 | - | 505 | 553 | 578 | |||||||||
Pensions/post
retirement benefits |
(410 | ) | (454 | ) | (296 | ) | (59 | ) | (18 | ) | 21 | (469 | ) | (472 | ) | (275 | ) | |
Exploration
and evaluation |
(8 | ) | - | - | (172 | ) | (124 | ) | (102 | ) | (180 | ) | (124 | ) | (102 | ) | ||
Share
options |
(38 | ) | (29 | ) | (17 | ) | (22 | ) | (9 | ) | (4 | ) | (60 | ) | (38 | ) | (21 | ) |
Effect
of historical average commodity prices in ore reserve determination |
(82 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (82 | ) | - | - | |||||||
Provision
for close down and restoration costs |
(29 | ) | 216 | 230 | 82 | 71 | 71 | 53 | 287 | 301 | ||||||||
Higher
cost of sales resulting from acquisition accounting |
- | - | - | (64 | ) | (49 | ) | (44 | ) | (64 | ) | (49 | ) | (44 | ) | |||
Start
up costs |
(122 | ) | (81 | ) | (79 | ) | (34 | ) | (29 | ) | (21 | ) | (156 | ) | (110 | ) | (100 | ) |
Proposed
dividends |
299 | 272 | 343 | 170 | 158 | 194 | 469 | 430 | 537 | |||||||||
Other |
29 | 15 | 2 | (140 | ) | (33 | ) | (22 | ) | (111 | ) | (18 | ) | (20 | ) | |||
Tax
effect of the above adjustments |
55 | (32 | ) | (30 | ) | (157 | ) | (28 | ) | 138 | (102 | ) | (60 | ) | 107 | |||
Deferred
tax on acquisitions: |
||||||||||||||||||
Impact
on mining property |
- | - | - | 831 | 825 | 853 | 831 | 825 | 853 | |||||||||
Impact
on tax provisions |
- | - | - | (831 | ) | (825 | ) | (853 | ) | (831 | ) | (825 | ) | (853 | ) | |||
Other
tax adjustments |
68 | 80 | 93 | 1 | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | 69 | 74 | 87 | |||||||
Outside
shareholders' interests in the above adjustments |
12 | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | (90 | ) | (100 | ) | 38 | (78 | ) | (101 | ) | 34 | |||
Share
of US GAAP adjustments of Rio Tinto Limited |
253 | 155 | 33 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
Shareholders'
funds under US GAAP |
8,931 | 7,697 | 8,371 | 4,996 | 2,922 | 1,920 | 12,044 | 9,517 | 9,571 | |||||||||
The Groups financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United Kingdom (‘UK GAAP’), which differ in certain respects from those in the United States ('US GAAP'). These differences relate principally to the following items, and the effect of each of the adjustments to net earnings and shareholders' funds that would be required under US GAAP is set out on this and the preceding page.
Goodwill
For 1997 and prior years, UK GAAP permitted
the write off of purchased goodwill on acquisition, directly against reserves.
For acquisitions in 1998 and subsequent years, goodwill is capitalised and
amortised over its expected useful life under UK GAAP. Under US GAAP, goodwill
is capitalised and, until 2001, was amortised by charges against income over
the period during which it was expected to be of benefit, subject to a maximum
of 40 years. Goodwill previously written off directly to reserves in the
UK GAAP financial statements was therefore reinstated and amortised, under
US GAAP. From 1 January 2002, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets
are no longer amortised under US GAAP but are reviewed annually for impairment
under FAS 142 'Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets'. Goodwill amortisation
of US$76 million charged against UK GAAP earnings for 2003 (2002: US$90 million)
is added back in the US GAAP reconciliation. No impairment write-downs were
required on the initial introduction of FAS 142.
Intangible assets under US GAAP
The implementation of FAS 141 'Business
Combinations' resulted in the reclassification of US$340 million from goodwill
to finite lived intangible assets at 1 January 2002. The accumulated cost
relating to these intangible assets at 31 December 2003 was US$714 million
and accumulated amortisation was US$432 million. The total amortisation expense
for 2003 was US$47 million of which US$16 million is related to the amortisation
of goodwill previously written off to reserves under UK GAAP now reclassified
as finite lived intangible assets under US GAAP. The remaining US$31 million
relates to the amortisation of goodwill included as an asset on the UK GAAP
balance sheet but now reclassified as finite lived intangible assets under
US GAAP.
The estimated amortisation charge relating
to intangible assets for each of the next five years is US$47 million.
Exchange differences included in earnings
under US GAAP
The Group finances its operations primarily
in US dollars and a significant proportion of the Group's US dollar debt
is located in its Australian operations. Under UK GAAP, this debt is
dealt with in the context of the currency status of the Group as a whole
and exchange differences reported by the Australian operations are adjusted
through reserves. US GAAP permits such exchange gains and losses to be
taken to reserves only to the extent that the US dollar debt hedges US
dollar assets in the Australian Group. Exchange gains of the Rio Tinto
Group of US$1,019 million pre-tax (2002: gains of US$240 million, 2001:
losses of US$216 million), US$623 million net of tax and minorities (2002:
US$177 million net of tax and minorities, 2001: US$148 million loss net
of tax and minorities), on US dollar debt that do not qualify for hedge
accounting under US GAAP have therefore been recorded in US GAAP earnings.
A-60
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Mark to market of derivative contracts
The Group is party to derivative contracts
in respect of some of its future transactions in order to hedge its exposure
to fluctuations in exchange rates against the US dollar. Under UK GAAP, these
contracts are accounted for as hedges: gains and losses are deferred and
subsequently recognised when the hedged transaction occurs. Under FAS 133
' Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities', which applied
to Rio Tinto from 1 January 2001, all derivative instruments are included
in the balance sheet as assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Certain
of the Group's derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting under
FAS 133, principally because the hedge is not located in the entity with
the relevant exposure. Unrealised pre-tax gains for the Rio Tinto Group of
US$182 million (2002: US$148 million), US$115 million after tax and minorities
(2002: US$104 million after tax and minorities), on such derivatives have
therefore been recorded in US GAAP earnings. Realised gains of US$105 million
pre tax (2002: US$9 million pre tax), US$75 million after tax and minorities,
(2002: US$6 million after tax and minorities), which have been capitalised
under UK GAAP have also been recorded in earnings under US GAAP.
Adjustments to asset carrying values
Following the implementation of FRS 11 in
1998, impairment of fixed assets under UK GAAP is recognised and measured
by reference to the discounted cash flows expected to be generated by an
income generating unit. Under US GAAP, impairment is recognised only when
the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying
value of the income generating unit. Where an asset is found to be impaired
under US GAAP, the amount of such impairment is generally similar under US
GAAP to that computed under UK GAAP, except where the US GAAP carrying value
includes additional goodwill. Under UK GAAP, impairment provisions may be
written back in a future year if the expected recoverable amount of the asset
increases. Such write backs of provisions are not permitted under US GAAP.
Therefore, any credits to UK GAAP earnings resulting from such write backs
are reversed in the reconciliation to US GAAP. The adjustment to asset carrying
values for the Rio Tinto Group in 2003 under US GAAP, of US$32 million, relates
to the reversal of a credit made to UK GAAP earnings on the write back of
an impairment provision.
The asset write downs for the Rio Tinto Group in 2002, under US GAAP, include amounts recognised in 2001 under UK GAAP of US$445 million and excludes asset write downs recognised in 2002 under UK GAAP of US$235 million. The 2002 Rio Tinto Group US GAAP asset write downs also include an adjustment for goodwill. The 2002 US GAAP impairment write-down for the Rio Tinto Group was US$1,067 million pre-tax (US$1,060 million net of tax and minorities). This is US$89 million pre-tax (US$297 million net of tax and minorities) above the charge of US$978 million pre-tax (US$763 million net of tax and minorities) included under UK GAAP. The asset write downs for Rio Tinto plc in 2002, under US GAAP, include amounts recognised in 2001 under UK GAAP, of US$445 million. The 2002 Rio Tinto plc asset write downs also include an adjustment for goodwill. The 2002 US GAAP impairment write-down for Rio Tinto plc was US$1,059 million pre-tax (US$1,052 million net of tax and minorities). This is US$420 million pre-tax (US$429 million net of tax and minorities) above the charge of US$639 million pre-tax (US$623 million net of tax and minorities) included under UK GAAP.
The asset write downs for Rio Tinto Limited in 2002, under US GAAP, exclude asset write downs recognised in 2002 under UK GAAP of US$212 million. The 2002 US GAAP impairment write-down for Rio Tinto Limited was US$13 million pre-tax (US$13 million net of tax and minorities). This is US$420 million pre-tax (US$212 million net of tax and minorities) below the charge of US$433 million pre-tax (US$225 million net of tax and minorities) included under UK GAAP. The 2001 US GAAP impairment write-down is US$243 million pre tax for the Rio Tinto Group, US$199 million pre tax for Rio Tinto plc and US$71 million pre tax for Rio Tinto Limited (Rio Tinto Group: US$183 million net of tax and minorities). For the Rio Tinto Group and for Rio Tinto plc this is US$472 million pre-tax (Rio Tinto Group: US$400 million net of tax and minorities) below the charges of US$715 million and US$671 million pre-tax included under UK GAAP for the Rio Tinto Group and Rio Tinto plc respectively (Rio Tinto Group: US$583 million net of tax and minorities). The net difference of US$468 million related to asset write-downs for the Rio Tinto Group and Rio Tinto plc comprises the above US$472 million, offset by US$4 million (Rio Tinto Group: US$3 million net of tax and minorities) of additional current year amortisation related to US GAAP adjustments made in previous years.
Pensions/post retirement benefits
Under UK GAAP, post retirement benefits
are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Standard Accounting Practice
24. The expected costs under defined benefit arrangements are spread over
the service lives of employees entitled to those benefits. Variations from
the regular cost are spread on a straight line basis over the expected average
remaining service lives of relevant current employees. Under US GAAP, the
annual pension cost comprises the estimated cost of benefits accruing in
the period adjusted for the amortisation of the surplus arising when FAS
87, 'Employers' Accounting for Pensions', was adopted. The charge is further
adjusted to reflect the cost of benefit improvements and any surpluses/deficits
that emerge as a result of variances from actuarial assumptions. For US purposes,
only those surpluses/deficits outside a ten per cent fluctuation 'corridor'
are spread.
The reductions in shareholders' funds at
31 December 2003, 2002 and 2001 also include the effect of the US GAAP requirement
to make immediate provision for pension fund deficits through other comprehensive
income. The provision reflects the reduction in equity values over recent
years.
Mandatory implementation of FRS 17, 'Retirement
Benefits', has been delayed until 2005 but additional disclosures are required
for 2001 onwards, which are included in note 14 to the financial statements.
Exploration and evaluation
Under UK GAAP, expenditure on a project
can be carried forward after it has reached a stage where there is a high
degree of confidence in its viability. US GAAP does not allow expenditure
to be carried forward unless the viability of the project is supported by
a final feasibility study. In addition, under UK GAAP, provisions made against
exploration and evaluation in prior years can be reversed when the project
proceeds to development, to the extent that the relevant costs are recoverable.
US GAAP does not allow such provisions to be reversed.
Share option plans
Under UK GAAP, no cost is accrued where
the option scheme applies to all relevant employees and the intention is
to satisfy the share options by the issuance of new shares. Under the fair
value recognition provisions of FAS 123, ' Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation',
the fair value of the plans is determined using an option pricing model.
A-61
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Effect of historical average commodity
prices in ore reserve determination
For UK and Australian reporting, the
Groups ore reserve estimates are determined in accordance with
the JORC code and are based on forecasts of future commodity prices.
During 2003, the SEC formally indicated that, for US reporting, historical
price data should be used. The application of historical prices has led
to reduced ore reserve quantities for US reporting purposes for certain
of the Groups operations, which results in lower earnings for US
reporting, largely as a result of higher depreciation charges. The reduced
ore reserves also had the effect of increasing the present value of the
provision for close down costs, which increased the cumulative effect
of the change in accounting principle recorded on implementation of FAS
143 in the US GAAP reconciliation for 2003.
Details of the differences in ore reserves
used for US reporting are set out on page A-75.
Provisions for close down and restoration
costs
FAS 143 'Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations' has been implemented with effect from 1 January 2003. Under
this US standard, provision is made in the accounting period when the
related environmental disturbance occurs, based on the net present value
of estimated future costs. The costs so recognised are capitalised and
depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related asset. In each
subsequent year, the discount applied to the provision 'unwinds', resulting
in a charge to the profit and loss account for the year and an increase
in the present value of the provision. This accounting treatment is broadly
similar to Rio Tinto's established policy under UK GAAP. Consequently,
the pre tax adjustment to the 'Provision for close down and restoration
costs' included in the above reconciliation at 31 December 2002 has now
been substantially reduced through the cumulative effect of this change
in accounting principle.
Higher cost of sales resulting from acquisition
accounting
Under UK GAAP, the inventories of acquired
companies are valued at the lower of replacement cost and net realisable
value. Under US GAAP, such inventories are recognised at the time of
acquisition on the basis of expected net sales proceeds. 2001 earnings
are lower under US GAAP as a result of the higher cost of sales relating
to inventories that were held at the date of acquisition. There is no
effect on 2003 or 2002 earnings.
Start up costs
Under US GAAP, Statement of Position 98-5,
'Reporting on the Costs of Start-up Activities', requires that the costs
of start up activities are expensed as incurred. Under UK GAAP, some of these
start up costs qualify for capitalisation and are amortised over the economic
lives of the relevant assets.
Proposed dividends
Under UK GAAP, ordinary dividends are recognised
in the financial year in respect of which they are paid. Under US GAAP, such
dividends are not recognised until they are formally declared by the board
of directors or approved by the shareholders.
Other
Other adjustments include amounts relating
to differences between UK and US accounting principles in respect of depreciation
of mining assets, revenue recognition and unrealised holding gains and losses.
Depreciation of mining assets - Under UK GAAP, mining assets are fully depreciated over their economic lives or the remaining life of the mine if shorter. In some cases, mineral resources that do not yet have the status of reserves are taken into account in determining depreciation charges, where there is a high degree of confidence that they will be mined economically. For US GAAP, only 'proven and probable reserves' are taken into account in the calculation of depreciation, depletion and amortisation charges. As a result, adjustments have been made to depreciation reducing Rio Tinto Group US GAAP pre tax earnings by US$59 million (2002: US$10 million, 2001: US$6 million), reducing Rio Tinto Plc pre tax earnings by US$12 million (2002: US$3 million increase, 2001: US$3 million increase) and reducing Rio Tinto Limited pre tax earnings by US$75 million (2002: US$20 million, 2001: US$15 million).
Revenue recognition - Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 ('SAB 101') 'Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements' has the result that, in some cases, sales recorded as revenue under UK GAAP are deferred and are not recognised as revenue under US GAAP until a future accounting period. Occasionally, sales of goods recorded as revenue for UK GAAP purposes may be kept in store by Rio Tinto at the request of the buyer. Under US GAAP, such transactions cannot be recognised as revenue unless the goods are physically segregated from the supplier's other inventory and certain additional criteria are met. In 2003, such timing differences resulted in a reduction in Rio Tinto Group US GAAP pre tax earnings of US$17 million (2002: US$4 million increase, 2001: US$5 million increase). The timing differences reduced Rio Tinto plc pre tax earnings by US$19 million (2002: US$2 million increase, 2001: US$4 million increase); and increased Rio Tinto Ltd's pre tax earnings by US$3 million (2002: US$4 million increase, 2001: US$1 million increase).
Unrealised holding gains and losses - UK GAAP permits current asset investments to be valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Under US GAAP, FAS 115 requires that unrealised holding gains and losses on investments classified as 'available for sale' are reported within a separate component of shareholders' funds and excluded from earnings until realised.
Taxation
Under UK GAAP, provision for taxes arising
on remittances of earnings can only be made if the dividends have been accrued
or if there is a binding agreement for the distribution of the earnings.
Under US GAAP, provision must be made for tax arising on expected future
remittances of past earnings. Under UK GAAP, deferred tax is not provided
in respect of upward fair value adjustments to tangible fixed assets and
inventories made on acquisitions. Under US GAAP, deferred tax must be provided
on all fair value adjustments to non-monetary assets recorded on acquisition
with a consequential increase in the amount allocated to mining properties
or goodwill as appropriate. Under UK GAAP, tax benefits associated with goodwill
charged directly to reserves in 1997 and previous years, must be accumulated
in the deferred tax provision. This means that the tax benefits are not included
in earnings until the related goodwill is charged through the profit and
loss account on disposal or closure. For US GAAP, no provision is required
for such deferred tax because the goodwill that gave rise to these tax benefits
was capitalised and gives rise to amortisation charges against profit.
Profit contribution from equity accounted
operations
Under US GAAP, investments in affiliates
are accounted for using the equity method, and the reporting entity's
share of the after tax profits and losses of its affiliates is included
in the income statement as a single line item. Under UK GAAP, the reporting
entity's share of the trading results of its associates and joint ventures
is split in the profit and loss account between its share of their operating
profits/losses, interest receivable/payable and taxation.
The Group's share of the after tax profits
and losses of associates and joint ventures is shown in its 'Statement of
Total Recognised Gains and Losses'.
A-62
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Consolidated statement of cash flows
The consolidated statement of cash flows
prepared in accordance with FRS 1 (revised) presents substantially the same
information as that required under US GAAP. Under US GAAP, however, there
are certain differences from UK GAAP with regard to the classification of
items within the cash flow statement and with regard to the definition of
cash and cash equivalents. Under US GAAP, tax paid and interest would form
part of operating cash flow. Similarly, deferred stripping costs which are
shown as capital expenditure under UK GAAP are included in operating cash
flow for the purposes of the US GAAP cash flow disclosure. Under UK GAAP,
cash for the purposes of the cash flow statement is defined as cash in hand
and deposits repayable on demand with any qualifying financial institution,
less bank borrowings from any qualifying financial institution repayable
on demand. Deposits are repayable on demand if they can be withdrawn at any
time without notice and without penalty or if a maturity or period of notice
of not more than 24 hours or one working day has been agreed. Under US GAAP,
cash equivalents comprise cash balances and current asset investments with
an original maturity of less than three months and exclude bank borrowings
repayable on demand.
Adjusted earnings
As permitted under UK GAAP, adjusted earnings
and adjusted earnings per share have been presented excluding the impact
of exceptional items to provide a measure that reflects the underlying performance
of the Group. This is in addition to the presentation of earnings and earnings
per share, which include the exceptional items. In accordance with US GAAP,
earnings and earnings per share have been presented based on US GAAP earnings,
without adjustment for the impact of exceptional items. Such additional measures
of underlying performance are not permitted under US GAAP.
Guarantor's Accounting
Under US GAAP there is a requirement for
entities to recognise, upon issue of a guarantee, an initial liability for
the fair value, or market value, of the associated obligation with disclosure
of that information in its interim and annual financial statements. FIN 45
is effective, on a prospective basis, to guarantees issued or modified after
31 December 2002. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 apply to these accounts
and the following information is given in response to these.
Note 29 to the financial statements discloses
indemnities and other performance guarantees totalling US$266 million on
which no material loss is expected. This includes US$19 million relating
to the Group's commitment to pay deferred consideration in relation to acquisitions
of mining properties in 2002 and previous years. This does not include guarantees
of payment of US$266 million entered into by the Group relating to deferred
consideration arising from such acquisitions because the deferred consideration
has been recognised as a liability within the Group's balance sheet. The
disclosure in note 29 also includes guarantees for up to US$140 million relating
to the costs of infrastructure financed by certain government authorities,
which would be subject to reimbursement by the Group if the facilities are
not completed or certain tests relating to the related project are not met.
Of the remaining US$107 million disclosed in note 29, US$32 million would
be subject to reimbursement by a third party in the event that the Group
was required to make payment under the guarantees.
In addition to the above, the Group has
issued guarantees and indemnities totalling US$652 million relating to its
close down, restoration and environmental remediation obligations. These
are not disclosed as contingent liabilities because the obligations are included
in the amounts recognised in the balance sheet as provisions for liabilities
and charges.
A Group company has guaranteed that the
quality of product from a joint venture in which it participates will be
in accordance with agreed specifications. It has also undertaken to make
up any shortfalls from minimum ore reserve quantities over the life of the
joint venture. Currently, no shortfalls are anticipated.
As explained in note 14 to the financial
statements, the Group has a partnership interest in the Colowyo Coal Company
and has undertaken, via a subsidiary company which entered into a management
agreement, to cause the partnership to perform its obligations under certain
coal supply contracts. The debt of US$163 million owed by the Colowyo Coal
Company is to be serviced and repaid out of the proceeds of these contracts.
Variable Interest Entities
In January 2003, the FASB issued interpretation
No. 46, 'Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities' (FIN 46). Under FIN
46, certain entities labelled Variable Interest Entities (VIE),
must be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity.
The primary beneficiary is generally defined as the party exposed to the
majority of the risks and rewards arising from the VIE. For VIEs in
which a significant variable interest is held that is not a majority interest,
certain disclosures are required. Full implementation of this interpretation
is required in the Groups financial statements for the year to 31 December
2004.
The Group has a 20% general
partnership interest in the Colowyo limited partnership, which was acquired
for US$25
million in December 1994. This joint venture may fall within the definition
of a Variable Interest Entity set out in FIN 46. The Colowyo joint venture
produces coal, which is sold under long-term contracts. Colowyos total
sales revenues for 2003 were US$101 million and its total assets as at 31
December 2003 were US$100 million. It is included in the Group accounts on
the equity accounting basis and the carrying value of the net investment
at 31 December 2003 was US$27 million under US GAAP. Colowyo has bonds in
issue with outstanding capital of US$163 million at 31 December 2003. These
are repayable by instalments up to 2016 with interest at rates between 9.56%
and 10.19% per annum. The bonds are to be serviced and repaid exclusively
out of the net revenues from certain specified sales contracts relating to
coal supplies by Colowyo. The bondholders bear the risks of loss that might
arise if the revenues are interrupted due to failure of the purchasers or
force majeure. The Rio Tinto Group is responsible under a management contract
in which it agreed, for the sole and exclusive benefit of the bondholders,
to cause Colowyo to perform its obligations under the specified coal sales
contracts.
A-63
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Post Retirement benefits
Information in respect of the net periodic benefit cost and related obligation
determined in accordance with US Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
87,106 and 132 is given below.
The measurement date used to establish year end asset values and benefit obligations
was 30 September 2003. The previous measurement date, used to determine 2003
costs, was 30 September 2002.
Benefits under the major pension plans are principally determined by years of service and employee remuneration. The Groups largest defined benefit pension plans are in the UK, Australia and the US and a description of the investment policies and strategies followed is set out below.
In the UK and the US, the investment strategy is determined by the pension plan trustee and investment committee respectively, after consulting the company. Agreed investment policies aim to ensure that the objectives are met in a prudent manner, consistent with established guidelines. The investment objectives include generating a return that exceeds consumer price and wage inflation over the long term. Ranges for the proportions to be held in each asset class have been agreed; a substantial proportion of the assets is invested in a spread of domestic and overseas equities, with a smaller proportion in fixed and variable income bonds, cash and, in the US, real estate. Risk is managed in various ways, including identifying investments considered to be unsuitable and placing limits on some types of investment. In particular, the funds are not allowed to invest directly in any Rio Tinto Group company.
In Australia, the investments reflect the various defined benefit and defined contribution liabilities and are primarily in Australian and overseas equities and fixed interest stocks.
At 30 September 2003, funded pension plans held assets invested in the following proportions:
UK target | US target* | Group actual | |||
Equities | 45%-85% | 65% | 65% | ||
Debt securities | 15%-45% | 30% | 27% | ||
Real estate | - | 5% | 3% | ||
Other | 0%-10% | - | 5% | ||
*plus or minus 5% |
The split of pension investments at 30 September 2002 is not readily available. However, a summary as at 31 December 2002 is set out in the FRS17 transitional disclosures on page A-54.
The expected rate of return on pension plan assets is determined as managements best estimate of the long term return of the major asset classes equity, debt, real estate and other weighted by the actual allocation of assets among the categories at the measurement date.
Pension plan funding policy is based on annual contributions at a rate that is intended to fund benefits as a level percentage of pay over the working lifetime of a plans participants, subject to local statutory minimum contribution requirements. Details of anticipated contributions in 2004 are set out in the FRS17 transitional disclosures on page A-54.
Assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost and the end of year benefit obligation for the major pension plans varied between the limits shown below. The average rate for each assumption has been weighted by benefit obligation. The assumptions used to determine the end of year benefit obligation are also used to calculate the following years cost.
2003 Cost | Year end benefit obligation | ||
Discount rate | 5.8% to 12.0% (Average: 6.7%) | 5.4% to 9.5% (Average: 5.9%) | |
Long term rate of return on plan assets | 6.5% to 12.0% (Average: 7.2%) | 6.3% to 11.0% (Average: 6.6%) | |
Increase in compensation levels | 3.3% to 11.0% (Average: 4.8%) | 3.7% to 6.5% (Average: 4.2%) |
The actuarial calculations in respect of the UK plans assume a rate of increase of pensions in payment of 2.6 per cent per annum. This assumption is consistent with the expected rates of return and salary increase assumptions in the respective valuations. Appropriate assumptions were made for plans in other countries.
Other post retirement benefits are provided to employees who meet the eligibility requirements, and their beneficiaries and dependants, through unfunded self-insurance arrangements. The majority of these plans are for employees in the United States. The plans are non-contributory, although some contain an element of cost sharing such as deductibles and co-insurance.
The weighted average assumptions used in determining the costs and year end benefit obligation for the major post retirement benefit plans other than pension plans were as below:
Cost | Year end benefit obligation | ||
Discount rate | 6.5% (2002: 6.5%) | 6.1% (2002: 6.5%) | |
Healthcare cost trend rate | 8.0% reducing to 5.0% by 2009 (2002: 8.5% reducing to 5.0% by 2009) | 11.2% reducing to 4.7% by 2011 (2002: 8.0% reducing to 5.0% by 2009) |
A-64
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Components of net benefit expense | ||||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Pension Benefits | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||||
Service cost | (55 | ) | (42 | ) | (45 | ) | (68 | ) | (55 | ) | (47 | ) | (123 | ) | (97 | ) | (92 | ) |
Interest cost on benefit obligation | (140 | ) | (147 | ) | (138 | ) | (70 | ) | (60 | ) | (57 | ) | (210 | ) | (207 | ) | (195 | ) |
Expected return on plan assets | 182 | 197 | 210 | 70 | 61 | 69 | 252 | 258 | 279 | |||||||||
Net amortisation and deferral: | ||||||||||||||||||
- transitional obligation | 10 | 10 | 12 | - | - | - | 10 | 10 | 12 | |||||||||
- recognised gains/(losses) | 3 | 18 | 4 | (9 | ) | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | (6 | ) | 10 | - | |||||
- prior service cost recognised | (21 | ) | (21 | ) | (18 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (23 | ) | (22 | ) | (19 | ) |
Total net amortisation and deferral | (8 | ) | 7 | (2 | ) | (11 | ) | (9 | ) | (5 | ) | (19 | ) | (2 | ) | (7 | ) | |
Net periodic benefit (cost)/credit | (21 | ) | 15 | 25 | (79 | ) | (63 | ) | (40 | ) | (100 | ) | (48 | ) | (15 | ) | ||
Curtailment (charge)/credit | - | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | - | - | - | - | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||
Net benefit credit/(expense) | (21 | ) | 7 | 21 | (79 | ) | (63 | ) | (40 | ) | (100 | ) | (56 | ) | (19 | ) | ||
The 2003 pension cost recognised for defined contribution plans, of US$9 million (2002: US$5 million), is included in the above.
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Other Benefits | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||||
Service cost | (8 | ) | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | - | (9 | ) | (7 | ) | (6 | ) | |
Interest cost on benefit obligation | (25 | ) | (23 | ) | (21 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | (28 | ) | (25 | ) | (24 | ) |
Net amortisation and deferral: | ||||||||||||||||||
- recognised gains | 5 | 8 | 8 | - | - | 3 | 5 | 8 | 11 | |||||||||
- prior service cost recognised | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total net amortisation and deferral | 6 | 9 | 9 | - | - | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | (27 | ) | (20 | ) | (18 | ) | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | - | (31 | ) | (23 | ) | (18) | ||
Curtailment (charge)/credit | 3 | (2 | ) | - | - | - | - | 3 | (2 | ) | - | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net benefit expense | (24 | ) | (22 | ) | (18 | ) | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | - | (28 | ) | (25 | ) | (18) | ||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Funded status of the Group's principal schemes | ||||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Pension benefits | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year | (2,680 | ) | (2,377 | ) | (1,903 | ) | (1,481 | ) | (989 | ) | (900 | ) | (4,161 | ) | (3,366 | ) | (2,803 | ) |
Fair value of plan assets | 2,488 | 2,256 | 2,271 | 1,347 | 910 | 917 | 3,835 | 3,166 | 3,188 | |||||||||
Plan assets (below)/in excess of benefit obligation | (192 | ) | (121 | ) | 368 | (134 | ) | (79 | ) | 17 | (326 | ) | (200 | ) | 385 | |||
Unrecognised prior service cost | 140 | 155 | 149 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 144 | 159 | 153 | |||||||||
Unrecognised net (gain)/loss | 305 | 239 | (252 | ) | 317 | 225 | 158 | 622 | 464 | (94 | ) | |||||||
Unrecognised transitional (asset)/obligation | (9 | ) | (27 | ) | (35 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (11 | ) | (29 | ) | (37 | ) |
Company contributions in fourth quarter | 4 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 29 | 7 | 4 | |||||||||
Net amount recognised at end of year | 248 | 248 | 231 | 210 | 153 | 180 | 458 | 401 | 411 | |||||||||
Comprising: | ||||||||||||||||||
- benefit prepayment | 243 | 212 | 270 | 171 | 134 | 187 | 414 | 346 | 457 | |||||||||
- benefit (provision) | (293 | ) | (236 | ) | (124 | ) | (116 | ) | (83 | ) | (75 | ) | (409 | ) | (319 | ) | (199 | ) |
- Intangible asset | 52 | 53 | 32 | 1 | - | - | 53 | 53 | 32 | |||||||||
- amount recognised through accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||
other comprehensive income | 246 | 219 | 53 | 154 | 102 | 68 | 400 | 321 | 121 | |||||||||
Net amount recognised | 248 | 248 | 231 | 210 | 153 | 180 | 458 | 401 | 411 | |||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Other benefits | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year | (501 | ) | (396 | ) | (323 | ) | (62 | ) | (41 | ) | (39 | ) | (563 | ) | (437 | ) | (362 | ) |
Fair value of plan assets | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Plan assets (below)/in excess of benefit obligation | (501 | ) | (396 | ) | (323 | ) | (62 | ) | (41 | ) | (39 | ) | (563 | ) | (437 | ) | (362 | ) |
Unrecognised prior service cost | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | - | - | - | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | |||
Unrecognised net (gain)/loss | 45 | (40 | ) | (96 | ) | 9 | - | - | 54 | (40 | ) | (96 | ) | |||||
Company contributions in fourth quarter | 4 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 5 | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net amount recognised at end of year | (454 | ) | (438 | ) | (421 | ) | (52 | ) | (41 | ) | - | (506 | ) | (479 | ) | (460 | ) | |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Comprising: | ||||||||||||||||||
- benefit (provision) | (454 | ) | (438 | ) | (421 | ) | (52 | ) | (41 | ) | (39 | ) | (506 | ) | (479 | ) | (460 | ) |
Net amount recognised | (454 | ) | (438 | ) | (421 | ) | (52 | ) | (41 | ) | (39 | ) | (506 | ) | (479 | ) | (460 | ) |
A-65
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Change in additional minimum liability before tax
Rio Tinto Group | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||
Pension benefits | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||
Accrued pension benefit expense | 79 | 221 | 148 | ||||
Increase in intangible asset | - |
(21 | ) |
(32 | ) |
||
Other comprehensive income before tax | 79 | 200 | 116 | ||||
Change in benefit obligation
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Pension benefits | US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
||||||||||
Benefit obligation at start of year | (2,377 | ) | (1,903 | ) | (2,033 | ) | (989 | ) | (900 | ) | (861 | ) | (3,366 | ) | (2,803 | ) | (2,894 | ) | |
Service cost | (50 | ) | (42 | ) | (45 | ) | (62 | ) | (55 | ) | (47 | ) | (112 | ) | (97 | ) | (92 | ) | |
Interest cost | (140 | ) | (147 | ) | (138 | ) | (70 | ) | (60 | ) | (57 | ) | (210 | ) | (207 | ) | (195 | ) | |
Contributions by plan participants | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (23 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | (26 | ) | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | |
Actuarial gains and (losses) | (381 | ) | (246 | ) | 90 | (172 | ) | 42 | 1 | (553 | ) | (204 | ) | 91 | |||||
Benefits paid | 151 | 141 | 125 | 109 | 54 | 70 | 260 | 195 | 195 | ||||||||||
Benefits bought out | 191 | - | - | - | - | - | 191 | - | - | ||||||||||
Plan amendments | (6 | ) | (16 | ) | (12 | ) | (1 | ) | - | - | (7 | ) | (16 | ) | (12 | ) | |||
Inclusion of DC liabilities | - | - | (2 | ) | - | - | (61 | ) | - | - | (63 | ) | |||||||
Settlement, curtailment and other gain/(loss) | (13 | ) | - | - | 23 | - | - | 10 | - | - | |||||||||
Currency and other adjustments | (52 | ) | (161 | ) | 114 | (296 | ) | (64 | ) | 59 | (348 | ) | (225 | ) | 173 | ||||
Benefit obligation at end of year | (2,680 | ) | (2,377 | ) | (1,903 | ) | (1,481 | ) | (989 | ) | (900 | ) | (4,161 | ) | (3,366 | ) | (2,803 | ) | |
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Other benefits | US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
||||||||||
Benefit obligation at start of year | (396 | ) | (323 | ) | (315 | ) | (41 | ) | (39 | ) | (40 | ) | (437 | ) | (362 | ) | (355 | ) | |
Service cost | (8 | ) | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | - | (9 | ) | (7 | ) | (6 | ) | ||
Interest cost | (25 | ) | (23 | ) | (21 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | (28 | ) | (25 | ) | (24 | ) | |
Actuarial (losses) | (83 | ) | (48 | ) | (8 | ) | (10 | ) | - | - | (93 | ) | (48 | ) | (8 | ) | |||
Benefits paid | 16 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 16 | 13 | ||||||||||
Plan amendments | 5 | (2 | ) | - | - | - | - | 5 | (2 | ) | - | ||||||||
Settlement, curtailment and other gain/(loss) | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | ||||||||||
Currency and other adjustments | (13 | ) | (8 | ) | 16 | (9 | ) | (1 | ) | 2 | (22 | ) | (9 | ) | 18 | ||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year | (501 | ) | (396 | ) | (323 | ) | (62 | ) | (41 | ) | (39 | ) | (563 | ) | (437 | ) | (362 | ) | |
Change in plan assets
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Pension benefits | US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at start of year | 2,256 | 2,271 | 2,840 | 910 | 917 | 1,024 | 3,166 | 3,188 | 3,864 | ||||||||||
Actual return/(loss) on plan assets | 486 | (108 | ) | (296 | ) | 203 | (42 | ) | (44 | ) | 689 | (150 | ) | (340 | ) | ||||
Contributions by plan participants | 3 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 6 | 4 | 26 | 9 | 6 | ||||||||||
Contributions by employer | 25 | 13 | 9 | 67 | 17 | 13 | 92 | 30 | 22 | ||||||||||
Benefits (paid) | (151 | ) | (141 | ) | (125 | ) | (109 | ) | (54 | ) | (70 | ) | (260 | ) | (195 | ) | (195 | ) | |
Benefits bought out | (191 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (191 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Settlement, curtailment and other gain/(loss) | 4 | - | - | (23 | ) | - | - | (19 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Currency and other adjustments | 56 | 218 | (159 | ) | 276 | 66 | (10 | ) | 332 | 284 | (169 | ) | |||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | 2,488 | 2,256 | 2,271 | 1,347 | 910 | 917 | 3,835 | 3,166 | 3,188 | ||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Other benefits | US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at start of year | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Contributions by employer | 16 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 16 | 13 | ||||||||||
Benefits (paid) | (16 | ) | (14 | ) | (11 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (18 | ) | (16 | ) | (13 | ) | |
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
A-66
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Sensitivity to change in healthcare trend
Changing the healthcare cost trend rates by 1% would result in the following effects:
Rio
Tinto plc - |
Rio
Tinto Limited - |
||||||||||||
part
of Rio Tinto Group |
part
of Rio Tinto Group |
Rio
Tinto Group |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
1% Increase | 1% Decrease | 1% Increase | 1% Decrease | 1% Increase | 1% Decrease | ||||||||
2003 | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||||
(Increase)/decrease in service cost plus interest cost | (5 | ) | 4 | - | - | (5 | ) | 4 | |||||
(Increase)/decrease in benefit obligation at September 30 | (61 | ) | 54 | (7 | ) | 6 | (68 | ) | 60 | ||||
2002 | |||||||||||||
(Increase)/decrease in service cost plus interest cost | (5 | ) | 4 | - | - | (5 | ) | 4 | |||||
(Increase)/decrease in benefit obligation at September 30 | (43 | ) | 35 | (5 | ) | 5 | (48 | ) | 40 | ||||
2001 | |||||||||||||
(Increase)/decrease in service cost plus interest cost | (5 | ) | 4 | - | - | (5 | ) | 4 | |||||
(Increase)/decrease in benefit obligation at September 30 | (34 | ) | 30 | (5 | ) | 4 | (39 | ) | 34 |
Effect of Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernisation Act of 2003
In January 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 106-1, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act). This FSP addresses the accounting implications of the newly issued Act to an entity that sponsors a postretirement health care plan that provides prescription drug benefits. This Act, signed into law on 8 December 2003 in the United States, introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of certain retiree health care benefit plans. The FSP includes an election to defer accounting for the implications of this new law until specific authoritative guidance to address the accounting treatment has been issued. As such, as a result of the lack of the existence of such guidance, any measures included in these financial statements of the accumulated post retirement benefit obligation (APBO) or net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the financial statements or accompanying notes do not reflect the effects of the Act on the plan. Authoritative guidance, when issued, could require a change in previously reported information.
A-67
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Accumulated foreign currency translation gains and (losses) recorded directly in shareholders' funds under US GAAP
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | |||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
At 1 January 2003 | (871 | ) | (261 | ) | (1,014 | ) | |
Current period change | 784 | 829 | 1,301 | ||||
At 31 December 2003 | (87 | ) | 568 | 287 | |||
At 1 January 2002 | (1,189 | ) | (428 | ) | (1,436 | ) | |
Current period change | 318 | 167 | 422 | ||||
At 31 December 2002 | (871 | ) | (261 | ) | (1,014 | ) | |
At 1 January 2001 | (935 | ) | (313 | ) | (1,111 | ) | |
Current period change | (254 | ) | (115 | ) | (325 | ) | |
At 31 December 2001 | (1,189 | ) | (428 | ) | (1,436 | ) | |
Additional US GAAP cash flow information
A summary of Rio Tinto's operating, investing
and financing activities classified in accordance with US GAAP is presented
below:
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
|||||||||||
Net cash flow from operating activities | 1,413 | 1,536 | 1,108 | 1,156 | 1,379 | 1,327 | 2,292 | 2,640 | 2,326 | ||||||||||
Net cash flow from investing activities | 112 | (1,042 | ) | (1,122 | ) | (667 | ) | (592 | ) | (1,277 | ) | (1,268 | ) | (1,663 | ) | (2,113 | ) | ||
Net cash flow from financing activities | (1,439 | ) | (507 | ) | (17 | ) | (505 | ) | (948 | ) | (87 | ) | (954 | ) | (1,151 | ) | (281 | ) | |
Increase/(decrease)
in cash and cash equivalents per
US GAAP |
86 | (13 | ) | (31 | ) | (16 | ) | (161 | ) | (37 | ) | 70 | (174 | ) | (68 | ) | |||
(Decrease)/increase in cash per UK GAAP | (9 | ) | (16 | ) | 6 | (74 | ) | (114 | ) | 34 | (83 | ) | (130 | ) | 40 | ||||
Decrease/(Increase)
in non qualifying liquid resources for US
GAAP |
110 | (2 | ) | (31 | ) | 10 | (25 | ) | (26 | ) | 120 | (27 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||
Increase/(decrease)
in bank borrowings repayable on demand included
in cash under UK GAAP |
(15 | ) | 5 | (6 | ) | 48 | (22 | ) | (45 | ) | 33 | (17 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||
Increase/(decrease)
in cash and cash equivalents per
US GAAP |
86 | (13 | ) | (31 | ) | (16 | ) | (161 | ) | (37 | ) | 70 | (174 | ) | (68 | ) | |||
Cash per balance sheet under UK GAAP | 257 | 174 | 364 | 138 | 151 | 315 | 395 | 325 | 679 | ||||||||||
Qualifying
liquid resources less non qualifying deposits |
- | (1 | ) | (135 | ) | (36 | ) | (44 | ) | (48 | ) | (36 | ) | (45 | ) | (183 | ) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents under US GAAP | 257 | 173 | 229 | 102 | 107 | 267 | 359 | 280 | 496 | ||||||||||
The year end cash and cash equivalents position under US GAAP included in the above table reflects both the movement in cash and cash equivalents in the year and the impact of exchange gains and losses in the year.
Deferred tax credit/(charge)
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | ||||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
US$m |
|||||||||||
The
credit/(charge) for deferred taxation arises as follows: |
|||||||||||||||||||
- accelerated capital allowances | (80 | ) | 158 | 168 | (3 | ) | 28 | 39 | (83 | ) | 186 | 207 | |||||||
- pension prepayments | 47 | (1 | ) | (39 | ) | 1 | 12 | 9 | 48 | 11 | (30 | ) | |||||||
- provisions | (26 | ) | 20 | 68 | 2 | (14 | ) | (27 | ) | (24 | ) | 6 | 41 | ||||||
- provision against AMT credits and US tax losses | 50 | (228 | ) | (144 | ) | - | - | - | 50 | (228 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||||
- other timing differences | 28 | 30 | 5 | 6 | 11 | (47 | ) | 34 | 41 | (42 | ) | ||||||||
19 | (21 | ) | 58 | 6 | 37 | (26 | ) | 25 | 16 | 32 | |||||||||
A-68
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Fixed asset investments
The aggregated profit and loss accounts and balance sheets of equity and gross
equity accounted companies on a 100 per cent basis are set out below:
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
Profit and loss account: | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales revenue | 11,230 | 9,295 | 9,966 | 1,044 | 1,841 | 1,643 | 7,078 | 6,622 | 6,313 | |||||||||
Cost of sales | (7,860 | ) | (6,826 | ) | (6,873 | ) | (860 | ) | (1,217 | ) | (1,066 | ) | (4,652 | ) | (4,384 | ) | (4,068 | ) |
Operating profit | 3,370 | 2,469 | 3,093 | 184 | 624 | 577 | 2,426 | 2,238 | 2,245 | |||||||||
Profit of equity accounted companies | 137 | 325 | 320 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
Profit on sale of fixed asset invesments | 126 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
Net interest | (445 | ) | (475 | ) | (534 | ) | (8 | ) | (49 | ) | (67 | ) | (317 | ) | (377 | ) | (392 | ) |
Profit before tax | 3,188 | 2,319 | 2,879 | 176 | 575 | 510 | 2,109 | 1,861 | 1,853 | |||||||||
Taxation | (1,070 | ) | (911 | ) | (963 | ) | (4 | ) | (91 | ) | (163 | ) | (714 | ) | (579 | ) | (604 | ) |
Profit attributable to outside shareholders | (59 | ) | 90 | (115 | ) | - | - | - | (48 | ) | (36 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||
Net profit on ordinary activities (100 per cent basis) | 2,059 | 1,498 | 1,801 | 172 | 484 | 347 | 1,347 | 1,246 | 1,206 | |||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - | Rio Tinto Limited - | |||||||||||||||||
part of Rio Tinto Group | part of Rio Tinto Group | Rio Tinto Group | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||||
Balance sheet: | ||||||||||||||||||
Intangible fixed assets | 1,062 | 988 | 942 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 64 | 194 | 196 | |||||||||
Tangible fixed assets | 18,499 | 15,942 | 15,549 | 2,002 | 2,758 | 2,491 | 11,406 | 12,086 | 11,765 | |||||||||
Investments | 1,247 | 1,235 | 983 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 78 | 166 | 162 | |||||||||
Working capital | 1,040 | (434 | ) | (363 | ) | 17 | 86 | 194 | 775 | 593 | 516 | |||||||
Net cash less current debt | (1,182 | ) | (2,658 | ) | (2,031 | ) | (13 | ) | (33 | ) | (97 | ) | 319 | (835 | ) | (164 | ) | |
Long term debt | (6,954 | ) | (5,667 | ) | (6,098 | ) | (402 | ) | (1,005 | ) | (1,181 | ) | (5,066 | ) | (5,406 | ) | (5,838 | ) |
Provisions | (3,457 | ) | (2,648 | ) | (2,853 | ) | (164 | ) | (361 | ) | (377 | ) | (1,462 | ) | (1,658 | ) | (1,949 | ) |
Outside shareholders' interests | (1,580 | ) | (847 | ) | (902 | ) | (1 | ) | - | - | (321 | ) | (290 | ) | (249 | ) | ||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Aggregate shareholders' funds (100 per cent basis) | 8,675 | 5,911 | 5,227 | 1,442 | 1,449 | 1,034 | 5,793 | 4,850 | 4,439 | |||||||||
|
For Rio Tinto plc the above disclosures include 100 per cent of the profit and loss account and balance sheet of Rio Tinto Limited.
Deferred Stripping
Information about the stripping ratios of the Business Units that account for
the majority of the deferred stripping balance at 31 December 2003, and year
in which deferred stripping is expected to be fully amortised, is set out in
the following table:
Actual stripping ratio | Life of mine stripping | |||||||||||
for year | ratio | |||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
Kennecott Utah Copper (2014) | 1.86 | 2.05 | 2.21 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 0.91 | ||||||
Borax (2037) | 23.00 | 25.00 | 28.00 | 16.00 | 16.00 | 16.00 | ||||||
Argyle Diamonds (2007) | 6.10 | 7.29 | 6.62 | 4.10 | 4.40 | 4.60 | ||||||
Freeport Joint Venture (2014) | 2.84 | 2.35 | 2.11 | 1.93 | 1.77 | 1.60 |
In addition, Escondida, Rio Tinto's 30 per cent owned joint venture, defers stripping costs based on the ratio of waste to pounds of copper mined. The actual stripping ratio for 2003 was 0.1015 (2002: 0.1458, 2001: 0.1476). The life of mine stripping ratio for 2003 was 0.1103 (2002: 0.1094, 2001: 0.1094). The deferred stripping balance is expected to be fully amortised in 2039.
A-69
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Unrealised holding gains and losses
Under FAS 115, unrealised holding gains and losses on investments classified
as 'available for sale' are excluded from earnings and reported within a separate
component of shareholders' funds until realised.
The following tables show the investments in debt and equity securities which are held as 'available for sale' in accordance with FAS 115, for the Rio Tinto Group, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited.
Unrealised | Unrealised | Net unrealised | ||||||||
Rio Tinto Group | Net book | holding | holding | Market | holding | |||||
value | gains | losses | value | gains/(losses) | ||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||
At 1 January 2003 | 70 | 5 | (5 | ) | 70 | - | ||||
Change | 9 | 14 | (1 | ) | 22 | 13 | ||||
At 31 December 2003 | 79 | 19 | (6 | ) | 92 | 13 | ||||
Unrealised | Unrealised | Net unrealised | ||||||||
Rio Tinto plc | Net book | holding | holding | Market | holding | |||||
value | gains | losses | value | gains/(losses) | ||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||
At 1 January 2003 | 56 | - | (1 | ) | 55 | (1 | ) | |||
Change | 13 | 19 | 1 | 33 | 20 | |||||
At 31 December 2003 | 69 | 19 | - | 88 | 19 | |||||
Unrealised | Unrealised | Net unrealised | ||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited | Net book | holding | holding | Market | holding | |||||
value | gains | losses | value | gains/(losses) | ||||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||
At 1 January 2003 | 14 | 5 | (4 | ) | 15 | 1 | ||||
Change | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | (11 | ) | (7 | ) |
At 31 December 2003 | 10 | - | (6 | ) | 4 | (6 | ) | |||
Share Option Plans
At 31 December 2003, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited have a number of share based option plans, which are described below. The Company accounts for the fair value of its grants under those plans in accordance with
FASB Statement 123. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for those plans was US$8 million, US$17 million and US$21 million for 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively.
Fixed Share Option Plans
Under these plans, the exercise price of each option equals the market price
of the Company's shares on the date of grant less a 20% discount and the maximum
term of the option is between 2 and 5 years.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using an adjusted Black-Scholes option-pricing model prior to 2003 and an actuarial binomial option-pricing model for options granted during 2003, with the following weighted average assumptions for grants in 2001, 2002 and 2003:
2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Risk-free | Expected | Dividend | Implied | |||||||||||||
interest rate | volatility | yield | Lifetime | |||||||||||||
% | % | % | years | |||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc | 4.42 | 30.00 | 2.60 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited | 5.28 | 25.00 | 2.60 | 4.4 | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||
Risk-free | Expected | Dividend | Implied | Risk-free | Expected | Dividend | Implied | |||||||||
interest rate | volatility | yield | Lifetime | interest rate | volatility | yield | Lifetime | |||||||||
% | % | % | years | % | % | % | years | |||||||||
Rio Tinto plc | 4.41 | 31.82 | 4.48 | 4.2 | 4.60 | 42.57 | 2.98 | 3.6 | ||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited | 5.35 | 26.13 | 2.58 | 4.8 | 5.38 | 26.02 | 3.30 | 4.7 |
A summary of the status of the Companies fixed share option plans as at 31 December 2001, 2002 and 2003, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:
Rio Tinto plc | ||||||||||||
Share Savings Plan | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||
average | average | average | ||||||||||
Number | share price | Number | share price | Number | share price | |||||||
£ | £ | £ | ||||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January | 2,079,845 | 8.14 | 2,010,403 | 7.74 | 1,285,340 | 6.32 | ||||||
Granted | 390,518 | 11.21 | 509,954 | 8.76 | 975,577 | 9.50 | ||||||
Exercised | (367,866 | ) | 8.47 | (278,134 | ) | 5.96 | (181,581 | ) | 7.27 | |||
Cancelled | (182,067 | ) | 9.06 | (162,378 | ) | 8.85 | (68,933 | ) | 7.59 | |||
Options outstanding at 31 December | 1,920,430 | 8.61 | 2,079,845 | 8.14 | 2,010,403 | 7.74 | ||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year | 4.20 | 2.78 | 3.98 | |||||||||
A-70
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued) |
Rio Tinto Limited - Share Savings Plan | ||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||
average | average | average | ||||||||||||
Number | share price | Number | share price | Number | share price | |||||||||
A$ | A$ | A$ | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January | 2,246,174 | 26.59 | 1,380,826 | 27.86 | - | - | ||||||||
Granted | 384,180 | 27.48 | 1,245,639 | 25.57 | 1,393,415 | 27.86 | ||||||||
Exercised | (12,588 | ) | 27.67 | (2,130 | ) | 27.86 | - | - | ||||||
Cancelled | (232,313 | ) | 26.76 | (378,161 | ) | 27.86 | (12,589 | ) | 27.86 | |||||
Options outstanding at 31 December | 2,385,453 | 26.71 | 2,246,174 | 26.59 | 1,380,826 | 27.86 | ||||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year | 10.90 | 7.59 | 11.34 | |||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - Share Savings Plan | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2003: | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||
Range of exercise prices | average | average | average | |||||||||
Number | remaining life | ex price | Number | ex price | ||||||||
years | £ | £ | ||||||||||
£5.20 - £7.80 | 480,851 | 0.5 | 5.33 | 538 | 6.41 | |||||||
£7.85 - £11.50 | 1,439,579 | 2.7 | 9.71 | 4,725 | 8.15 | |||||||
£5.20 - £11.50 | 1,920,430 | 2.2 | 8.61 | 5,263 | 7.97 | |||||||
At 31 December 2002 there were 3,554 (2001: nil) options exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of £7.44.
Rio Tinto Limited - Share Savings Plan | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2003: | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||
Range of exercise prices | average | average | average | |||||||||
Number | remaining life | ex price | Number | ex price | ||||||||
years | A$ | A$ | ||||||||||
A$25 - A$28 | 2,385,453 | 3.3 | 26.71 | - | - | |||||||
Performance Based Share Option Plan
Under its 1998 Executive Share Option Scheme and Share Option Plan, the Company grants selected executives and other key employees share option awards vesting of which is contingent upon increases in the Company's earnings per share above certain predetermined target levels. The exercise price of each option, which has a 10-year life, is equal to the market price of the Company's shares on the date of grant.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using an adjusted Black-Scholes option-pricing model prior to 2003 and an actuarial binomial option-pricing model for options granted during 2003, with the following weighted average assumptions for grants in 2001, 2002 and 2003:
2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Risk-free | Expected | Dividend | Implied | |||||||||||||
interest rate | volatility | yield | Lifetime | |||||||||||||
% | % | % | years | |||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc | 4.30 | 30.00 | 3.10 | 7.4 | ||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited | 5.30 | 25.00 | 3.10 | 7.4 | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||
Risk-free | Expected | Dividend | Implied | Risk-free | Expected | Dividend | Implied | |||||||||
interest rate | volatility | yield | Lifetime | interest rate | volatility | yield | Lifetime | |||||||||
% | % | % | years | % | % | % | years | |||||||||
Rio Tinto plc | 5.22 | 30.84 | 2.83 | 10 | 4.76 | 30.04 | 3.18 | 10 | ||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited | 6.51 | 25.92 | 2.76 | 10 | 5.27 | 26.02 | 2.98 | 10 |
A summary of the status of the Company's performance-based share option plan as of 31 December 2001, 2002 and 2003, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:
Rio Tinto plc - Share Option Plan | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
|||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
average | average | average | |||||||||||||||
Number | share price | Number | share price | Number | share price | ||||||||||||
£ | £ | £ | |||||||||||||||
Options
outstanding at 1 January
|
7,186,254 | 11.35 | 5,785,625 | 9.97 | 4,381,611 | 8.66 | |||||||||||
Granted | 2,305,406 | 12.63 | 2,095,314 | 14.59 | 1,931,747 | 12.66 | |||||||||||
Exercised | (1,009,307 | ) | 8.50 | (540,568 | ) | 8.16 | (392,021 | ) | 8.20 | ||||||||
Cancelled | (797,927 | ) | 13.05 | (154,117 | ) | 14.72 | (135,712 | ) | 10.86 | ||||||||
Expired | (21,501 | ) | 12.98 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Options
outstanding at 31 December
|
7,662,925 | 11.93 | 7,186,254 | 11.35 | 5,785,625 | 9.97 | |||||||||||
Weighted-average
fair value of options granted during the year
|
2.68 | 4.99 | 4.52 |
A-71
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued) | |||||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto Limited - Share Option Plan | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
|||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
average | average | average | |||||||||||||||
Number | share price | Number | share price | Number | share price | ||||||||||||
A$ | A$ | A$ | |||||||||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January |
2,439,330 | 33.42 | 1,694,730 | 28.09 | 853,188 | 22.13 | |||||||||||
Granted | 1,242,475 | 33.34 | 1,003,849 | 39.87 | 932,265 | 33.01 | |||||||||||
Exercised | (58,975 | ) | 22.04 | (208,528 | ) | 20.15 | (78,775 | ) | 21.15 | ||||||||
Cancelled | (18,197 | ) | 33.76 | (50,721 | ) | 37.65 | (11,948 | ) | 32.53 | ||||||||
Expired | (2,496 | ) | 33.01 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Options outstanding at 31 December |
3,602,137 | 33.58 | 2,439,330 | 33.42 | 1,694,730 | 28.09 | |||||||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year | 6.01 | 13.71 | 11.10 | ||||||||||||||
Rio Tinto plc - Share Option Plan | |||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2003: | |||||||||||||
Options
Outstanding |
Options exercisable | ||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||
Range of exercise prices | average | average | average | ||||||||||
Number | remaining life | ex price | Number | ex price | |||||||||
years | £ | £ | |||||||||||
£8 - £10 | 2,332,738 | 5.5 | 8.89 | 2,332,738 | 8.89 | ||||||||
£12 - £15 | 5,330,187 | 8.2 | 13.26 | - | - | ||||||||
£8 - £15 | 7,662,925 | 7.4 | 11.93 | 2,332,738 | 8.89 | ||||||||
At 31 December 2002 there were 1.9 million (2001: 1 million) options exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of £8.13 (2001: £8.20)
Rio Tinto Limited - Share Option Plan | |||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2003: |
|||||||||||||
Options Outstanding | Options exercisable | ||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||
Range of exercise prices |
average | average | average | ||||||||||
Number | remaining life | ex price | Number | ex price | |||||||||
years | A$ | A$ | |||||||||||
A$20 - A$25 | 506,268 | 5.6 | 23.12 | 506,268 | 23.12 | ||||||||
A$30 - A$40 | 3,095,869 | 8.3 | 35.29 | - | - | ||||||||
A$20 - A$40 | 3,602,137 | 7.9 | 33.58 | 506,268 | 23.12 | ||||||||
At 31 December 2002 there were 0.3 million (2001: 0.2 million) options exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of A$22.18 (2001: A$20.14)
A-72
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Rio Tinto plc - Executive Share Option Scheme | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||
average | average | average | |||||||||||
Number | share price | Number | share price | Number | share price | ||||||||
£ | £ | £ | |||||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January | 62,000 | 8.49 | 130,786 | 8.09 | 238,336 | 7.89 | |||||||
Exercised | (39,000 | ) | 8.41 | (68,786 | ) | 7.73 | (107,550 | ) | 7.65 | ||||
Options outstanding at 31 December | 23,000 | 8.61 | 62,000 | 8.49 | 130,786 | 8.09 | |||||||
Number of options exercisable at year end | 23,000 | 62,000 | 130,786 | ||||||||||
Weighted-average exercise price of options exercisable at year end | 8.61 | 8.49 | 8.09 |
As at 31 December 2003, Rio Tinto plc has 0.02 million performance options outstanding under the 1985 Executive Share Option Scheme with a exercise price of £8.61. These options have vested and have a weighted average remaining life of 0.3 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Rio Tinto Share Ownership Plan is a UK Inland Revenue approved share incentive plan which was approved by shareholders at the 2001 annual general meeting and introduced in 2002. Under this plan, eligible employees may save up to £125 per month, which the plan administrator invests in Rio Tinto plc shares ("Partnership" shares). Rio Tinto matches these purchases on a one for one basis ("Matching" shares). In addition, eligible employees can receive an annual award of Rio Tinto shares up to a maximum of five per cent of salary, subject to a cap of £3,000 ("Free" Shares).
The fair value of each award is taken to be the market value of the share on the date of purchase. The compensation costs for stocks granted during 2002 and 2003 were $0.3 million and $1.4 million respectively.
A summary of the shares awarded under the Company's employee stock purchase plan during the years 2002 and 2003 is presented below:
Rio Tinto Share Ownership Plan | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Number | Weighted | Number | Weighted | ||||||
of shares | average | of shares | average | ||||||
awarded | share price | awarded | share price | ||||||
£ | £ | ||||||||
Matching Shares | 19,385 | 12.81 | 16,937 | 12.30 | |||||
Free Shares | 50,942 | 11.96 | - | - | |||||
Total | 70,327 | 12.19 | 16,937 | 12.30 | |||||
Performance Based Stock Plan
The Mining Companies Comparative Plan is a long-term performance share incentive plan which was approved by shareholders at the 1998 annual general meeting. Under this plan, eligible senior executives are annually awarded a conditional right to receive shares. These rights only vest if the performance conditions approved by the committee are satisfied. The current performance condition compares Rio Tinto's total shareholder return against a comparator group of 15 other international mining companies over a four year period.
The fair value of the awards is taken to be the market value of the shares at the date of award.
A summary of the status of the Company's performance-based stock plan as of 31 December 2001, 2002 and 2003, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:
Rio Tinto plc - Mining Companies Comparative Plan | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||
average | average | average | |||||||||||
share price | share price | share price | |||||||||||
Number | at award | Number | at award | Number | at award | ||||||||
£ | £ | £ | |||||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January | 1,312,121 | 10.21 | 1,220,500 | 9.40 | 901,403 | 8.89 | |||||||
Awarded | 349,258 | 12.52 | 378,122 | 12.40 | 330,603 | 10.83 | |||||||
Cancelled | (113,985 | ) | 11.86 | (22,326 | ) | 12.40 | (11,506 | ) | 10.83 | ||||
Vested | (349,121 | ) | 7.39 | (264,175 | ) | 9.39 | - | - | |||||
Options outstanding at 31 December | 1,198,273 | 11.55 | 1,312,121 | 10.21 | 1,220,500 | 9.40 | |||||||
The compensation costs for stocks granted during 2001, 2002 and 2003 were £3.5 million, £4.7 million and £4.4 million respectively.
Rio Tinto Ltd - Mining Companies Comparative Plan | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||
average | average | average | |||||||||||
share price | share price | share price | |||||||||||
Number | at award | Number | at award | Number | at award | ||||||||
£ | £ | £ | |||||||||||
Options outstanding at 1 January | 774,606 | 25.56 | 804,920 | 22.22 | 635,243 | 20.95 | |||||||
Awarded | 183,997 | 34.95 | 182,060 | 33.68 | 207,584 | 26.38 | |||||||
Cancelled | (3,612 | ) | 34.95 | (5,002 | ) | 33.38 | (27,433 | ) | 24.55 | ||||
Vested | (243,308 | ) | 19.32 | (207,372 | ) | 19.55 | (10,474 | ) | 21.57 | ||||
Options outstanding at 31 December | 711,683 | 30.07 | 774,606 | 25.56 | 804,920 | 22.22 | |||||||
The compensation costs for stocks granted during 2001, 2002 and 2003 were A$5.5 million, A$6.1 million and A$6.4 million respectively.
A-73
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
The following supplements segmental information provided elsewhere in this report to provide additional information required under US GAAP.
Property, plant and equipment by location
Rio Tinto Group | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||
% | % | % | US$m | US$m | US$m | ||||||||
North America | 36.2 | 42.7 | 48.3 | 5,504 | 5,204 | 5,566 | |||||||
Australia and New Zealand | 54.6 | 48.5 | 44.0 | 8,290 | 5,912 | 5,071 | |||||||
South America | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 168 | 112 | 139 | |||||||
Africa | 5.6 | 5.0 | 3.6 | 851 | 608 | 420 | |||||||
Indonesia | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 28 | 50 | 52 | |||||||
Europe and other countries | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 355 | 297 | 264 | |||||||
100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 15,196 | 12,183 | 11,512 | ||||||||
Tax charge by product group
Rio Tinto Group | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
Iron Ore | (226 | ) | (215 | ) | (239 | ) | |
Energy | (96 | ) | (197 | ) | (212 | ) | |
Industrial Minerals | (93 | ) | (200 | ) | (219 | ) | |
Aluminium | (106 | ) | (107 | ) | (168 | ) | |
Copper | (223 | ) | (126 | ) | (153 | ) | |
Diamonds | (76 | ) | (33 | ) | (31 | ) | |
Other operations | (13 | ) | (16 | ) | (5 | ) | |
Tax on exploration | 17 | 18 | 26 | ||||
Other items, including tax relief on asset write downs | 249 | 168 | 283 | ||||
(567 | ) | (708 | ) | (718 | ) | ||
Covenants
Of the Rio Tinto Group's medium and long term borrowings of US$3.8 billion, some US$0.8 billion relates to the Group's share of non-recourse borrowings which are the subject of various financial and general covenants with which the respective borrowers are in compliance.
Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities
During 2003, the following movements, before tax and minorities, took place in Other Comprehensive Income ('OCI') and earnings in relation to derivatives:
Derivative | Recorded in | ||||||
assets less | Recorded in | retained | |||||
liabilities | OCI | earnings | |||||
US$m | US$m | US$m | |||||
Net
derivative (liabilities)/assets on balance sheet at 31 December 2002 |
(54 | ) | (60 | ) | 6 | ||
Less:
net derivative liabilities marked to market through OCI at 1 January
2003 relating to contracts
maturing in 2003 (a) |
9 | 9 | - | ||||
Less:
net derivative assets marked to market through retained earnings at 1
January 2003 relating to contracts maturing in 2003 (b) |
(34 | ) | - | (34 | ) | ||
Add:
mark to market of net derivative assets designated as FAS 133 cash
flow hedges at 31 December 2003 (c) |
139 | 139 | - | ||||
Add:
mark to market of net derivative assets not designated as hedges under FAS
133 at 31 December 2003 (d) |
207 | - | 207 | ||||
On balance sheet at 31 December 2003 | 267 | 88 | 179 | ||||
(a) | During 2003, net losses of US$9 million relating to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges under FAS 133 were transferred from accumulated OCI to US GAAP earnings on maturity of the contracts. |
(b) | During 2003, accrued gains of US$34 million relating to derivatives that were not designated as hedges under FAS 133 were realised on maturity of the contracts |
(c) | The fair value of net derivative liabilities designated as cash flow hedges under FAS 133 reduced by US$148 million during 2003 resulting in a closing asset balance related to cash flow hedging activities of US$88 million in OCI. These cash flow hedges hedge the Group's exposure to the US dollar in relation to future trading transactions. The Group expects to reclassify US$43 million of this amount as increases in earnings over the next twelve months as these contracts and the transactions which they hedge mature. As at 31 December 2003, the Group had US$144 million of cash flow hedge derivative assets and US$56 million of cash flow hedge derivative liabilities. The cash flow hedges extend to 2010. |
(d) | Certain of the Group's derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133, principally because the hedge is not located in the entity with the exposure. The fair value of these net derivative assets increased by US$173 million during 2003. As at 31 December 2003, the Group had US$197 million of assets relating to derivatives which do not qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133, and US$18 million of liabilities. |
A-74
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
ALTERNATIVE ORE RESERVE ESTIMATES FOR US REPORTING
As a consequence of the US Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) requirement to use historical price data rather than assumptions of future commodity prices, which are the basis of the JORC Code reported numbers on pages 17 to 21 of the Annual Report, the reserves at certain operations have been amended for SEC reporting purposes only. Material changes are shown below.
The ore reserve figures in the following tables are as of 31 December 2003. Metric units are used throughout. The figures used to calculate Rio Tinto's share of reserves are often more precise than the rounded numbers shown in the tables, hence small differences might result if the calculations are repeated using the tabulated figures.
Type of | Proved ore reserves | Probable ore reserves | SEC ore reserves 2003 compared with | Average | 2003 Rio Tinto share | |||||||||||||||||||||
mine | at end 2003 | at end 2003 | JORC 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(a | ) | Tonnage | Grade | mill | SEC Recover -able metal |
JORC Recover -able metal |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tonnage | Grade | Tonnage | Grade | SEC | JORC | SEC | JORC | recovery | Interest | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2003 | 2003 | 2003 | % | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
COPPER | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
of tonnes | %Cu | of tonnes | %Cu | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Cu | %Cu | of tonnes | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- open pit | O/P | 22.8 | 0.62 | 422 | 0.57 | 445 | 557 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 89 | 100.0 | 2.253 | 2.542 | |||||||||||||
- underground block cave | U/G | - | 321 | - | 0.70 | 91 | 100.0 | - | 2.022 | |||||||||||||||||
- underground skarn ores | U/G | - | 13.5 | - | 1.89 | 93 | 100.0 | - | 0.236 | |||||||||||||||||
Escondida (Chile) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- sulphide | O/P | 636 | 1.45 | 700 | 1.04 | 1,337 | 1,482 | 1.24 | 1.21 | 86 | 30.0 | 4.214 | 4.615 | |||||||||||||
- low grade float | O/P | 103 | 0.63 | 227 | 0.63 | 330 | 565 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 81 | 30.0 | 0.501 | 0.827 | |||||||||||||
- oxide | O/P | 130 | 0.76 | 34.5 | 0.60 | 164 | 185 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 88 | 30.0 | 0.314 | 0.334 | |||||||||||||
- mixed | O/P | 31.0 | 1.36 | 31.0 | 50.0 | 1.36 | 1.04 | 39 | 30.0 | 0.049 | 0.061 | |||||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 7.331 | 10.637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto copper operations | 20.209 | 23.514 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
GOLD | millions | grammes | millions | grammes | millions | millions | grammes | grammes | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||
of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | of tonnes | per tonne | per tonne | of ounces | of ounces | |||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- open pit | O/P | 22.8 | 0.40 | 422 | 0.37 | 445 | 557 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 66 | 100.0 | 3.494 | 3.834 | |||||||||||||
- underground block cave | U/G | - | 321 | - | 0.27 | 68 | 100.0 | - | 1.856 | |||||||||||||||||
- underground skarn ores | U/G | - | 13.5 | - | 1.22 | 66 | 100.0 | - | 0.351 | |||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) | U/G | 5.6 | 4.02 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 4.02 | 3.95 | 72 | 70.3 | 0.362 | 0.435 | |||||||||||||||
Morro do Ouro (Brazil) | O/P | 327 | 0.42 | 61.7 | 0.38 | 389 | 361 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 81 | 51.0 | 2.153 | 1.999 | |||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 6.009 | 8.475 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto gold operations | 31.192 | 33.658 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LEAD | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
of tonnes | %Pb | of tonnes | %Pb | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Pb | %Pb | of tonnes | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) | U/G | 5.6 | 4.11 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 4.11 | 4.02 | 76 | 70.3 | 0.123 | 0.146 | |||||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 0.123 | 0.146 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto lead operations | 0.533 | 0.556 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
MOLYBDENUM | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
of tonnes | %Mo | of tonnes | %Mo | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Mo | %Mo | of tonnes | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- open pit | O/P | 22.8 | 0.038 | 422 | 0.042 | 445 | 557 | 0.041 | 0.037 | 55 | 100.0 | 0.102 | 0.114 | |||||||||||||
- underground block cave | U/G | - | 321 | - | 0.035 | 48 | 100.0 | - | 0.054 | |||||||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 0.102 | 0.168 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto molybdenum operations | 0.102 | 0.168 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
SILVER | millions | grammes | millions | grammes | millions | millions | grammes | grammes | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||
of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | per tonne | of tonnes | of tonnes | per tonne | per tonne | of ounces | of ounces | |||||||||||||||||
Bingham Canyon (US) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- open pit | O/P | 22.8 | 3.49 | 422 | 2.95 | 445 | 557 | 2.97 | 2.72 | 80 | 100.0 | 33.929 | 38.908 | |||||||||||||
- underground block cave | U/G | - | 321 | - | 2.69 | 71 | 100.0 | - | 19.682 | |||||||||||||||||
- underground skarn ores | U/G | - | 13.5 | - | 13.4 | 71 | 100.0 | - | 4.114 | |||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) | U/G | 5.6 | 530 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 530 | 483 | 75 | 70.3 | 50.152 | 55.556 | |||||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 84.081 | 118.260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto silver operations | 184.705 | 218.884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ZINC | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
of tonnes | %Zn | of tonnes | %Zn | of tonnes | of tonnes | %Zn | %Zn | of tonnes | of tonnes | |||||||||||||||||
Greens Creek (US) | U/G | 5.6 | 10.6 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 87 | 70.3 | 0.364 | 0.444 | |||||||||||||||
Total of operations listed above | 0.364 | 0.444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of all Rio Tinto zinc operations | 1.230 | 1.310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) Likely mining method: O/P = open pit; U/G = underground. |
A - 75