FORM 424B3
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-152974
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS
OF
CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC.
AND STOCKHOLDERS OF
ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES,
INC.
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. (formerly known as
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc), which is referred to as Cliffs, and Alpha
Natural Resources, Inc., which is referred to as Alpha, have
entered into an agreement and plan of merger pursuant to which
Alpha Merger Sub, Inc., a
wholly-owned
subsidiary of Cliffs, which is referred to as merger sub, will
merge with and into Alpha, or, under certain circumstances, as
described in Annex G, merger sub will be converted
from a Delaware corporation to a Delaware limited liability
company, Alpha Merger Sub, LLC, and Alpha will merge with and
into Alpha Merger Sub, LLC. Upon successful completion of the
merger, Alpha stockholders will be entitled to receive a
combination of cash and Cliffs common shares in exchange for
their shares of Alpha common stock. Pursuant to the merger, each
share of Alpha common stock (other than shares of Alpha common
stock held by any dissenting Alpha stockholder that has properly
exercised appraisal rights in accordance with Delaware law, held
in treasury by Alpha or owned by Cliffs) will be converted into
the right to receive 0.95 of a common share of Cliffs and $22.23
in cash, without interest. Upon completion of the merger, we
estimate that Alphas former stockholders will own
approximately 37% of the then-outstanding common shares of
Cliffs, based on the number of shares of Alpha common stock and
Cliffs common shares outstanding on October 6, 2008. Cliffs
shareholders will continue to own their existing shares, which
will not be affected by the merger. Common shares of Cliffs are
listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
CLF. Upon completion of the merger, Alpha common
stock, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol ANR, will be delisted. When the merger is
completed, Cliffs common shares will continue to be listed on
the New York Stock Exchange.
We expect the merger to be nontaxable for federal income tax
purposes for Alpha stockholders and Cliffs shareholders, except
for the receipt by Alpha stockholders of cash in exchange for
their Alpha common stock or cash instead of fractional common
shares of Cliffs.
We are each holding our special meeting of shareholders in order
to obtain those approvals necessary to consummate the merger. At
the Cliffs special meeting, Cliffs will ask its shareholders to
adopt the merger agreement and approve the issuance of common
shares of Cliffs in connection with the merger. At the Alpha
special meeting, Alpha will ask its stockholders to adopt the
merger agreement. The obligations of Cliffs and Alpha to
complete the merger are also subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of several other conditions to the merger. More
information about Cliffs, Alpha and the proposed merger is
contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We urge
you to read this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and the
documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, carefully and in their entirety, in
particular, see Risk Factors beginning on
page 27.
After careful consideration, each of our boards of directors has
approved the merger agreement and has determined that the merger
agreement and the merger are advisable and in the best interests
of the shareholders of Cliffs and stockholders of Alpha,
respectively. Accordingly, the Alpha board of directors
recommends that the Alpha stockholders vote
for
the adoption of the merger agreement. The Cliffs board of
directors recommends that the Cliffs shareholders vote
for
the adoption of the merger agreement and the issuance of Cliffs
common shares to be issued in connection with the merger.
We are very excited about the opportunities the proposed merger
brings to both Alpha stockholders and Cliffs shareholders, and
we thank you for your consideration and continued support.
|
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
|
|
Michael J. Quillen
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Any representation to the contrary
is a criminal offense.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated October 23,
2008, and is first being mailed to Alpha stockholders and Cliffs
shareholders on or about October 23, 2008.
REFERENCES
TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Except where we indicate otherwise, as used in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, Cliffs refers to Cliffs
Natural Resources Inc. (formerly known as Cleveland-Cliffs Inc)
and its consolidated subsidiaries and Alpha refers
to Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries. This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates
important business and financial information about Cliffs and
Alpha from documents that each company has filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the
SEC, but that have not been included in or delivered with this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. For a list of documents
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and how you may obtain them, see
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 239.
This information is available to you without charge upon your
written or oral request. You can also obtain the documents
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus by accessing the SECs website
maintained at
http://www.sec.gov.
In addition, Cliffs filings with the SEC are available to
the public on Cliffs website,
http://www.cliffsnaturalresources.com,
and Alphas filings with the SEC are available to the
public on Alphas website,
http://www.alphanr.com.
Information contained on Cliffs website, Alphas
website or the website of any other person is not incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and you
should not consider information contained on those websites as
part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Cliffs will provide you with copies of this information relating
to Cliffs, without charge, if you request them in writing or by
telephone from:
Cliffs
Natural Resources Inc.
1100 Superior Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio
44114-2544
Attention: Investor Relations
(216) 694-5700
Alpha will provide you with copies of this information relating
to Alpha, without charge, if you request them in writing or by
telephone from:
Alpha
Natural Resources, Inc.
One Alpha Place, P.O. Box 2345
Abingdon, Virginia 24212
Attention: Investor Relations
(276) 619-4410
If you would like to request documents, please do so by
November 14, 2008, in order to receive them before the
special meetings.
Cliffs has supplied all information contained in or incorporated
by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus relating
to Cliffs, and Alpha has supplied all information contained in
or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus relating to Alpha.
ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES,
INC.
One Alpha Place, P.O. Box 2345
Abingdon, Virginia 24212
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 21,
2008
To our fellow Stockholders of Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.:
We will hold our special meeting of stockholders at our offices
located at One Alpha Place, Abingdon, Virginia 24212, on
November 21, 2008, at 11 a.m. E.T., unless adjourned
to a later date. This special meeting will be held for the
following purposes:
1. To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
July 15, 2008, as it may be amended from time to time, by
and among Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (now known as Cliffs Natural
Resources Inc.), Alpha Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., and Alpha Natural
Resources, Inc., pursuant to which Alpha Merger Sub, Inc. will
merge with and into Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., or, under
certain circumstances, as described in Annex G,
Alpha Merger Sub, Inc. will be converted from a Delaware
corporation to a Delaware limited liability company, Alpha
Merger Sub, LLC, and Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. will merge
with and into Alpha Merger Sub, LLC, on the terms and subject to
the conditions contained in the merger agreement, and each
outstanding share of common stock of Alpha Natural Resources,
Inc. (other than shares held by any of its dissenting
stockholders that have properly exercised appraisal rights in
accordance with Delaware law, held in its treasury or owned by
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.) will be converted into the right
to receive $22.23 in cash, without interest, and 0.95 of a
common share of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. A copy of the
merger agreement is attached as Annex A to the
accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus; and
2. To approve adjournments of the Alpha Natural Resources,
Inc. special meeting, if necessary, to permit further
solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the
time of the Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. special meeting to
approve the above proposal.
These items of business are described in the accompanying joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Only stockholders of record at the
close of business on October 10, 2008, are entitled to
notice of the Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. special meeting and
to vote at the Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. special meeting and
any adjournments of the Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. special
meeting.
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.s board of directors has
approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement, including the merger, and has
determined that the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable and fair to,
and in the best interests of, Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. and
its stockholders. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.s board of
directors recommends that you vote
for
the adoption of the merger agreement.
In deciding to approve the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger,
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.s board of directors
considered the fairness opinion of its financial advisor
delivered on July 15, 2008 and attached as
Annex B to the accompanying joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The fairness opinion speaks only as of its
date and does not address the fairness of the merger
consideration from a financial point of view at the time the
merger is completed. We urge you to read Risk
Factors Risks Relating to the Merger The
fairness opinions obtained by Cliffs and Alpha from their
respective financial advisors will not reflect changes in
circumstances between signing the merger agreement and the
completion of the merger on page 29.
Under Delaware law, appraisal rights will be available to Alpha
Natural Resources, Inc. stockholders of record who do not vote
in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement. To exercise
your appraisal rights, you must strictly follow the procedures
prescribed by Delaware law, submit a timely written demand for
appraisal prior to the
vote on the adoption of the merger agreement and otherwise
comply with the requirements for exercising appraisal rights.
These procedures are summarized in the accompanying joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not
you plan to attend the Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. special
meeting in person, please complete, sign and date the enclosed
proxy card(s) as soon as possible and return it in the
postage-prepaid envelope provided, or vote your shares by
telephone or over the Internet as described in the accompanying
joint proxy statement/prospectus. Submitting a proxy now will
not prevent you from being able to vote at the special meeting
by attending in person and casting a vote. However, if you do
not return or submit the proxy or vote your shares by telephone
or over the Internet or vote in person at the special meeting,
the effect will be the same as a vote against the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement.
By order of the board of directors,
Vaughn Groves
Vice President, Secretary and General
Counsel
Please vote your shares promptly. You can find instructions
for voting on the enclosed proxy card.
If you have questions, contact:
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
One Alpha Place, P.O. Box 2345
Abingdon, Virginia 24212
Attention: Investor Relations
(276) 619-4410
or
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
48 Wall Street,
22nd Floor
New York, New York 10005
Banks and Brokers call collect: (212) 269-5550
All others call toll-free: (888) 887-0082
Abingdon, Virginia, October 23, 2008
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT.
Please complete, date, sign and return your proxy card(s), or
vote your shares by telephone or over the Internet at your
earliest convenience so that your shares are represented at the
meeting.
CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES
INC.
1100 Superior Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio
44114-2544
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 21,
2008
To our fellow Shareholders of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.:
The special meeting of shareholders of Cliffs Natural Resources
Inc. will be held at The Forum Conference Center located at One
Cleveland Center, 1375 East Ninth Street, Cleveland,
Ohio 44114 on November 21, 2008, at 11 a.m. E.T.,
unless postponed or adjourned to a later date. The Cliffs
Natural Resources Inc. special meeting will be held for the
following purposes:
1. To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
July 15, 2008, as it may be amended from time to time, by
and among Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (now known as Cliffs Natural
Resources Inc.), Alpha Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., and Alpha Natural
Resources, Inc., pursuant to which Alpha Merger Sub, Inc. will
merge with and into Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., or, under
certain circumstances, as described in Annex G,
Alpha Merger Sub, Inc. will be converted from a Delaware
corporation to a Delaware limited liability company, Alpha
Merger Sub, LLC, and Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. will merge
with and into Alpha Merger Sub, LLC, on the terms and subject to
the conditions contained in the merger agreement, and approve
the issuance of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. common shares in
connection with the merger. A copy of the merger agreement is
attached as Annex A to the accompanying joint proxy
statement/prospectus;
2. To approve adjournments or postponements of the Cliffs
Natural Resources Inc. special meeting, if necessary, to permit
further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient
votes at the time of the Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. special
meeting to adopt the merger agreement and approve the issuance
of the Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. common shares on the terms
and subject to the conditions contained in the merger
agreement; and
3. To consider and take action upon any other business that
may properly come before the Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
special meeting or any reconvened meeting following an
adjournment or postponement of the Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
special meeting.
These items of business are described in the accompanying joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Only shareholders of record at the
close of business on October 6, 2008, are entitled to
notice of the Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. special meeting and
to vote at the Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. special meeting and
any adjournments or postponements of the Cliffs Natural
Resources Inc. special meeting.
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.s board of directors has
approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement, including the merger and the issuance
of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. common shares in connection
with the merger, and has determined that the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable and fair to,
and in the best interests of, Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. and
its shareholders. Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.s board of
directors recommends that you vote
for
the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
issuance of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. common shares pursuant
to the merger agreement.
In deciding to approve the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger and
the issuance of the Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. common shares
in connection with the merger, Cliffs Natural Resources
Inc.s board of directors considered the fairness opinion
of its financial advisor delivered on July 15, 2008 and
attached as Annex C to the accompanying joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The fairness opinion speaks only as of its
date and does not address the fairness of the merger
consideration from a financial point of view at the time the
merger is completed. We urge you to read Risk
Factors Risks Relating to the Merger The
fairness opinions obtained by Cliffs and Alpha from their
respective financial advisors will not reflect changes in
circumstances between signing the merger agreement and the
completion of the merger on page 29.
Under Chapter 1701 of the Ohio Revised Code,
dissenters rights will be available to Cliffs Natural
Resources Inc. shareholders of record who do not vote in favor
of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the
issuance of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. common shares. To
exercise your dissenters rights, you must strictly follow
the procedures prescribed by Chapter 1701 of the Ohio
Revised Code. These procedures are summarized in the
accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not
you plan to attend the Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. special
meeting in person, please complete, sign and date the enclosed
proxy card(s) as soon as possible and return it in the
postage-prepaid envelope provided, or vote your shares by
telephone or over the Internet as described in the accompanying
joint proxy statement/prospectus. Submitting a proxy now will
not prevent you from being able to vote at the special meeting
by attending in person and casting a vote. However, if you do
not return or submit the proxy or vote your shares by telephone
or over the Internet or vote in person at the special meeting,
the effect will be the same as a vote against the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs
Natural Resources Inc. common shares in the merger.
By order of the board of directors,
George W. Hawk, Jr.
General Counsel and Secretary
Please vote your shares promptly. You can find instructions
for voting on the enclosed proxy card.
If you have questions, contact:
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
1100 Superior Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio
44114-2544
Attention: Investor Relations
(216) 694-5700
or
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue,
20th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Shareholders may call toll-free: (877) 456-3507
Banks and Brokers call collect: (212) 750-5833
Cleveland, Ohio, October 23, 2008
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT.
Please complete, date, sign and return your proxy card(s) or
vote your shares by telephone or over the Internet at your
earliest convenience so that your shares are represented at the
meeting.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
F-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEXES
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Opinion of Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware
|
|
|
D-1
|
|
Section 1701.85 of Chapter 1701 of the Ohio Revised
Code
|
|
|
E-1
|
|
Effects of Merger if Restructured
|
|
|
G-1
|
|
iv
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETINGS AND THE MERGER
The following questions and answers briefly address some
commonly asked questions about the special meetings and the
merger. They may not include all the information that is
important to you. Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. (formerly,
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc), which we refer to as Cliffs, and Alpha
Natural Resources, Inc., which we refer to as Alpha, urge you to
read carefully this entire joint proxy statement/prospectus,
including the annexes and the other documents to which we have
referred you. We have included page references in certain parts
of this section to direct you to a more detailed description of
each topic presented elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
The
Merger
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why am I receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus? |
|
A: |
|
The boards of directors of each of Alpha and Cliffs have agreed
to the acquisition of Alpha by Cliffs pursuant to the terms of a
merger agreement that is described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. A copy of the merger agreement is attached
to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A. |
|
|
|
In order to complete the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, Cliffs shareholders and Alpha
stockholders must vote on and approve proposals described in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and all other conditions
to the merger must be satisfied or waived. Alpha and Cliffs will
hold separate special meetings of their respective shareholders
to seek to obtain these approvals. |
|
|
|
This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains important
information about the merger agreement, the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, and
the respective special meetings of the stockholders of Alpha and
shareholders of Cliffs, which you should read carefully. The
enclosed proxy materials allow you to grant a proxy to vote your
shares without attending your respective companys special
meeting in person. |
|
|
|
Your vote is very
important. We encourage you to submit your proxy as soon as
possible. |
|
Q: |
|
What is the proposed transaction for which I am being asked
to vote? |
|
A: |
|
Alpha stockholders are being asked to adopt the merger agreement
at the Alpha special meeting. A copy of the merger agreement is
attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex A. The approval of the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement by Alpha stockholders is a condition to the
obligation of the parties to the merger agreement to complete
the merger. See The Merger Conditions to
Completion of the Merger on page 92 and
Summary Conditions to Completion of the
Merger beginning on page 12. |
|
|
|
Cliffs shareholders are being asked to adopt the merger
agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs common shares
pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement at the Cliffs
special meeting. The approval of this proposal by the Cliffs
shareholders is a condition to the obligation of the parties to
the merger agreement to complete the merger. See The
Merger Conditions to Completion of the Merger
on page 92 and Summary Conditions to
Completion of the Merger beginning on page 12. |
|
Q: |
|
Why are Alpha and Cliffs proposing the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Alpha and Cliffs both believe that the merger will provide
substantial strategic and financial benefits to the stockholders
of both companies. The combined company, which we refer to as
the combined company, will become one of the largest U.S. mining
companies and be positioned as a leading diversified mining and
natural resources company. In addition, Alpha is also proposing
the merger to provide its stockholders with the opportunity to
receive the merger consideration and to offer Alpha stockholders
the opportunity to participate in the growth and opportunities
of the combined company by receiving Cliffs common shares
pursuant to the merger. To review the reasons for the merger in
greater detail, see The Merger Alphas
Reasons for the Merger and Recommendation of Alphas Board
of Directors beginning on page 59 and The
Merger Cliffs Reasons for the Merger and
Recommendation of Cliffs Board of Directors
beginning on page 61. |
1
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the positions of the Alpha and Cliffs boards of
directors regarding the merger and the proposals relating to the
adoption of the merger agreement and the issuance of Cliffs
common shares? |
|
A: |
|
Both boards of directors have approved the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including
the merger, and determined that the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement are advisable and fair to, and in the best
interests of, their respective companies and stockholders. The
Alpha board of directors recommends that the Alpha stockholders
vote
for
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement at the
Alpha special meeting. The Cliffs board of directors recommends
that the Cliffs shareholders vote
for
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and
approve the issuance of Cliffs common shares pursuant to the
terms of the merger agreement at the Cliffs special meeting. See
The Merger Alphas Reasons for the Merger
and Recommendation of Alphas Board of Directors
beginning on page 59, The Merger
Cliffs Reasons for the Merger and Recommendation of
Cliffs Board of Directors beginning on page 61,
Summary The Merger Alphas
Reasons for the Merger on page 9 and
Summary The Merger Cliffs
Reasons for the Merger on page 9. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote is needed by Alpha stockholders to adopt the merger
agreement? |
|
A: |
|
The adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative
vote of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Alpha
common stock entitled to vote. If you are an Alpha stockholder
and you abstain from voting, that will have the same effect as a
vote against the adoption of the merger agreement. See The
Alpha Special Meeting Quorum and Vote Required
beginning on page 40. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote is needed by Cliffs shareholders to adopt the
merger agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs common
shares pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement? |
|
A: |
|
The adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
issuance of Cliffs common shares pursuant to the terms of the
merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of at least
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of
outstanding common shares of Cliffs and 3.25% Redeemable
Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock of Cliffs,
which we refer to as
Series A-2
preferred stock, voting together as a class. If you are a Cliffs
shareholder and you abstain from voting, that will have the same
effect as a vote against the adoption of the merger agreement
and the issuance of Cliffs common shares pursuant to the merger
agreement. See The Cliffs Special Meeting
Quorum and Vote Required beginning on page 44. |
|
|
|
The former owners of PinnOak Resources, LLC, or PinnOak, which,
held, collectively, as of the record date, 4,000,000 common
shares of Cliffs, or approximately 3.5% of all of the common
shares of Cliffs issued and outstanding as of the record date,
and United Mining Co., Ltd., or United Mining, which held as of
the record date 4,311,471 common shares of Cliffs, or
approximately 3.8% of the then issued and outstanding common
shares of Cliffs, each entered into separate voting agreements
with Cliffs, pursuant to which they have agreed, among other
things, to vote their respective common shares of Cliffs in
favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval
of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen in the proposed merger? |
|
A: |
|
In the proposed merger, Alpha Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Cliffs, which we refer to as merger sub, will
merge with and into Alpha, with Alpha as the surviving company.
Under certain circumstances, the merger may be restructured so
that merger sub will be converted from a Delaware corporation to
a Delaware limited liability company, Alpha Merger Sub, LLC, and
Alpha will merge with and into Alpha Merger Sub, LLC, with Alpha
Merger Sub, LLC as the surviving company. The effects of the
merger, if it is restructured in this way, are described in
Annex G. After the merger, Alpha will no longer be a
public company and will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Cliffs. See The Merger Agreement The Merger;
Closing beginning on page 96. |
|
Q: |
|
What will Alpha stockholders receive in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
In the merger, holders of Alpha common stock (other than shares
of Alpha common stock held by any dissenting Alpha stockholder
that has properly exercised appraisal rights in accordance with
Delaware law, held in |
2
|
|
|
|
|
treasury by Alpha or owned by Cliffs) will be entitled to
receive for each share of Alpha common stock (which will be
cancelled in the merger): |
|
|
|
$22.23 in cash, without interest; and
|
|
|
|
0.95 of a fully paid, nonassessable common share of
Cliffs.
|
|
|
|
Although both the cash portion and the share portion of the
merger consideration are fixed, due to the fluctuations in the
market value of the Cliffs common shares, the value of the
Cliffs common shares to be issued in the merger will fluctuate
with movements in the price of Cliffs common shares. See
Risk Factors Risks Relating to the
Merger Because the market price of Cliffs common
shares will fluctuate, Alpha stockholders cannot be sure of the
value of the merger consideration they will receive on
page 27. |
|
|
|
Alpha stockholders will be entitled to receive cash for any
fractional common shares of Cliffs that they would otherwise be
entitled to receive in the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the potential principal adverse consequences of the
merger to the Cliffs shareholders? |
|
A: |
|
Following the consummation of the merger, Cliffs shareholders
will participate in one of the largest U.S. mining
companies with a mine portfolio including nine iron ore
facilities and more than 60 coal mines located across North
America, South America and Australia. Although the combined
company will have a significantly increased size and scope, if
the combined company is unable to realize the strategic and
financial benefits currently anticipated to result from the
merger, then Cliffs shareholders could experience dilution of
their economic interest in Cliffs without receiving a
commensurate benefit. In addition, it is possible that the
merger could result in dilution to Cliffs earnings per
share. Further, any adverse changes to the financial condition,
results of operations, business, competitive position,
reputation and business prospects of Alpha could potentially
adversely affect the value of the combined company, thereby
decreasing the value of the Cliffs common shares after the
merger. Please see Risk Factors Risks Relating
to the Merger beginning on page 27 and Risk
Factors Risks Relating to the Combined
Companys Operations After Consummation of the Merger
beginning on page 38 for a further discussion of the material
risks associated with the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Do Alpha stockholders have appraisal rights? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Alpha stockholders who do not vote in favor of adopting the
merger agreement and who otherwise comply with the requirements
of Delaware law will be entitled to appraisal rights to receive
the statutorily determined fair value of their
shares of Alpha common stock as determined by the Delaware
Chancery Court, rather than the merger consideration. For a full
description of the appraisal rights available to Alpha
stockholders, see Summary Appraisal Rights of
Alpha Stockholders beginning on page 11 and The
Merger Appraisal Rights of Alpha Stockholders
beginning on page 87. |
|
Q: |
|
Do Cliffs shareholders have dissenters rights? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Cliffs shareholders are entitled to exercise
dissenters rights in connection with the merger, provided
they comply with the requirements of Chapter 1701 of the
Ohio Revised Code, which we refer to as the Ohio General
Corporation Law. For a full description of the dissenters
rights of Cliffs shareholders, see Summary
Dissenters Rights of Cliffs Shareholders on
page 12 and The Merger Dissenters
Rights of Cliffs Shareholders beginning on page 90. |
|
Q: |
|
Will the rights of Alpha stockholders change as a result of
the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Alpha stockholders will become Cliffs shareholders and
their rights as Cliffs shareholders will be governed by the Ohio
General Corporation Law and Cliffs amended articles of
incorporation, as amended, which we refer to as the amended
articles of incorporation, and regulations, which we refer to as
the regulations. For a summary description of those rights, see
Comparison of Rights of Shareholders beginning on
page 217. For a copy of Cliffs amended articles of
incorporation or regulations, see Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 239. |
|
Q: |
|
Will the rights of Cliffs shareholders change as a result of
the merger? |
|
A: |
|
No. Cliffs shareholders will retain their shares of Cliffs
and their rights will continue to be governed by the Ohio
General Corporation Law and Cliffs amended articles of
incorporation and regulations. |
3
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Where do Cliffs common shares trade? |
|
A: |
|
Common shares of Cliffs trade on the New York Stock Exchange, or
NYSE, under the symbol CLF. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect to complete the merger? |
|
A: |
|
If the merger agreement is adopted at the Alpha special meeting
and the merger agreement is adopted and the issuance of Cliffs
common shares is approved at the Cliffs special meeting, we
expect to complete the merger as soon as possible after the
satisfaction of the other conditions to the merger. There may be
a substantial period of time between the approval of the
proposals by stockholders at the special meetings of
Alphas stockholders and Cliffs shareholders and the
effectiveness of the merger. We currently anticipate that, if
the necessary approvals of Alphas stockholders and
Cliffs shareholders are obtained, the merger will be
completed prior to the end of 2008. See The Merger
Agreement The Merger; Closing beginning on
page 96. |
|
Q: |
|
Who will be the directors of Cliffs after the merger? |
|
A: |
|
The directors of Cliffs immediately prior to the merger will
continue as directors after the effective time of the merger. In
addition, Cliffs has agreed to take all actions required to
appoint two members of Alphas board of directors, Michael
J. Quillen and Glenn A. Eisenberg, to Cliffs board after
the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Should I send in my stock certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
NO, PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR STOCK CERTIFICATE(S) WITH YOUR
PROXY CARD(S). If the merger is completed, Cliffs will send
Alpha stockholders written instructions for sending in their
stock certificates or, in the case of book-entry shares, for
surrendering their book-entry shares. See The Alpha
Special Meeting Proxy Solicitations on
page 43 and The Merger Agreement Exchange
of Shares beginning on page 98. Cliffs shareholders
will not need to send in their share certificates or surrender
their book-entry shares. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can answer my questions about the merger? |
|
A: |
|
If you have any questions about the merger or your special
meeting, need assistance in voting your shares, or need
additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or
the enclosed proxy card(s), you should contact: |
If you are a Cliffs shareholder:
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue,
20th
Floor
New York, NY 10022
Shareholders may call toll-free:
(877) 456-3507
Banks and Brokers call collect:
(212) 750-5833
If you are an Alpha stockholder:
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
48 Wall Street,
22nd
Floor
New York, NY 10005
Banks and Brokers call collect:
(212) 269-5550
All others call toll-free:
(888) 887-0082
Procedures
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When and where are the special meetings? |
|
A: |
|
The Alpha special meeting will be held at the offices of Alpha
located at One Alpha Place, Abingdon, Virginia 24212, at 11 a.m.
E.T. on November 21, 2008. |
|
|
|
The Cliffs special meeting will be held at The Forum Conference
Center located at One Cleveland Center, 1375 East Ninth Street,
Cleveland, Ohio 44114, at 11 a.m. E.T. on November 21, 2008. |
4
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who is eligible to vote at the Alpha and Cliffs special
meetings? |
|
A: |
|
Owners of Alpha common stock are eligible to vote at the Alpha
special meeting if they were stockholders of record at the close
of business on October 10, 2008. See The Alpha
Special Meeting Record Date; Outstanding Shares;
Shares Entitled to Vote on page 40. |
|
|
|
Owners of Cliffs common shares and shares of
Series A-2
preferred stock are eligible to vote at the Cliffs special
meeting if they were shareholders of record at the close of
business on October 6, 2008. See The Cliffs Special
Meeting Record Date; Outstanding Shares; Shares
Entitled to Vote on page 44. |
|
Q: |
|
What should I do now? |
|
A: |
|
You should read this joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully,
including the annexes, and return your completed, signed and
dated proxy card(s) by mail in the enclosed postage-paid
envelope or by submitting your proxy by telephone or over the
Internet as soon as possible so that your shares will be
represented and voted at your special meeting. You may vote your
shares by signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy
card(s), or by voting by telephone or over the Internet. A
number of banks and brokerage firms participate in a program
that also permits shareholders whose shares are held in
street name to direct their vote by telephone or
over the Internet. This option, if available, will be reflected
in the voting instructions from the bank or brokerage firm that
accompany this joint proxy statement/prospectus. If your shares
are held in an account at a bank or brokerage firm that
participates in such a program, you may direct the vote of these
shares by telephone or over the Internet by following the voting
instructions enclosed with the proxy form from the bank or
brokerage firm. See The Alpha Special Meeting
How to Vote beginning on page 41 and The Cliffs
Special Meeting How to Vote beginning on
page 46. |
|
Q: |
|
If I am going to attend my special meeting, should I return
my proxy card(s)? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Returning your signed and dated proxy card(s) or voting by
telephone or over the Internet ensures that your shares will be
represented and voted at your special meeting. See The
Alpha Special Meeting How to Vote beginning on
page 41 and The Cliffs Special Meeting
How to Vote beginning on page 46. |
|
Q: |
|
How will my proxy be voted? |
|
A: |
|
If you complete, sign and date your proxy card(s) or vote by
telephone or over the Internet, your proxy will be voted in
accordance with your instructions. If you sign and date your
proxy card(s) but do not indicate how you want to vote at your
special meeting: |
|
|
|
for Alpha stockholders, your shares will be voted
for
the adoption of the merger agreement. If you vote for the
adoption of the merger agreement at the Alpha special meeting,
you will lose the appraisal rights to which you would otherwise
be entitled. See Summary Appraisal Rights of
Alpha Stockholders beginning on page 11, The
Merger Appraisal Rights of Alpha Stockholders
beginning on page 87 and The Alpha Special
Meeting How to Vote beginning on
page 41; and
|
|
|
|
for Cliffs shareholders, your shares will be voted
for
the adoption of the merger agreement and the issuance
of Cliffs common shares. If you vote for the adoption of the
merger agreement and the issuance of the Cliffs common shares at
the Cliffs special meeting, you will lose the dissenters
rights to which you would otherwise be entitled. See
Summary Dissenters Rights of Cliffs
Shareholders on page 12, The Merger
Dissenters Rights of Cliffs Shareholders beginning
on page 90 and The Cliffs Special Meeting
How to Vote beginning on page 46.
|
5
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote after I mail my proxy card(s) or vote by
telephone or over the Internet? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. If you are a record holder of Alpha common stock or Cliffs
common shares or shares of
Series A-2
preferred stock, you can change your vote by: |
|
|
|
sending a written notice to the corporate secretary
of the company in which you hold shares that is received prior
to your special meeting and states that you revoke your proxy;
|
|
|
|
signing and delivering a new proxy card(s) bearing a
later date;
|
|
|
|
voting again by telephone or over the Internet and
submitting your proxy so that it is received prior to your
special meeting; or
|
|
|
|
attending your special meeting and voting in person,
although your attendance alone will not revoke your proxy.
|
|
|
|
If your shares are held in a street name account,
you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to change
your vote. |
|
Q: |
|
What if my shares are held in street name by my
broker? |
|
A: |
|
If a broker holds your shares for your benefit but not in your
own name, your shares are in street name. In that
case, your broker will send you a voting instruction form to use
in voting your shares. The availability of telephone and
Internet voting depends on your brokers voting procedures.
Please follow the instructions on the voting instruction form
they send you. If your shares are held in your brokers
name and you wish to vote in person at your special meeting, you
must contact your broker and request a document called a
legal proxy. You must bring this legal proxy to your
respective special meeting in order to vote in person. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I dont provide my broker with instructions on
how to vote? |
|
A: |
|
Generally, a broker may only vote the shares that it holds for
you in accordance with your instructions. However, if your
broker has not received your instructions, your broker has the
discretion to vote on certain matters that are considered
routine. A broker non-vote occurs if your broker
cannot vote on a particular matter because your broker has not
received instructions from you and because the proposal is not
routine. Broker non-votes could be counted in determining
whether a quorum is present at the respective special meetings
of Alpha stockholders and Cliffs shareholders. Nevertheless,
since we do not anticipate that there will be any routine
matters on the agenda for the respective special meetings
of Alpha stockholders and Cliffs shareholders, we expect that
there will be practical impediments that will prevent us from
counting broker non-votes for purposes of a quorum at those
special meetings. |
|
|
|
Alpha Stockholders |
|
|
|
If you wish to vote on the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement, you must provide instructions to your broker because
this proposal is not routine. If you do not provide your broker
with instructions, your broker will not be authorized to vote
with respect to adopting the merger agreement, and a broker
non-vote will occur. This will have the same effect as a vote
against
the adoption of the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
Cliffs Shareholders |
|
|
|
If you wish to vote on the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs common shares
pursuant to the merger agreement, you must provide instructions
to your broker because this proposal is not routine. If you do
not provide your broker with instructions, your broker will not
be authorized to vote with respect to the adoption of the merger
agreement and the issuance of Cliffs common shares, and a broker
non-vote will occur. This will have the same effect as a vote
against
the adoption of the merger agreement and the issuance of Cliffs
common shares. |
6
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What if I abstain from voting? |
|
A: |
|
Your abstention from voting will have the following effect: |
|
|
|
If you are an Alpha stockholder: |
|
|
|
Abstentions will be counted in determining whether a quorum is
present at the special meeting. With respect to the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement, abstentions will have the same
effect as a vote
againstthe
proposal to adopt the merger agreement. With respect to the
proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to
solicit further proxies in connection with the merger agreement
adoption proposal, abstentions will have the same effect as a
vote
against
the proposal to adjourn the Alpha special meeting. |
|
|
|
If you are a Cliffs shareholder: |
|
|
|
Abstentions will be counted in determining whether a quorum is
present at the special meeting. With respect to the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs
common shares pursuant to the merger agreement, abstentions will
have the same effect as a vote
against
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the
issuance of Cliffs common shares in connection with the merger.
With respect to the proposal to adjourn or postpone the special
meeting, if necessary, to solicit further proxies in connection
with the merger agreement adoption and share issuance proposal,
abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
againstthe
proposal to adjourn or postpone the Cliffs special meeting,
whether a quorum is present or not. |
|
Q: |
|
What does it mean if I receive multiple proxy cards? |
|
A: |
|
Your shares may be registered in more than one account, such as
brokerage accounts and 401(k) accounts. It is important that you
complete, sign, date and return each proxy card or voting
instruction card you receive or vote using the telephone or the
Internet as described in the instructions included with your
proxy card(s) or voting instruction card(s). |
|
Q: |
|
Where can I find more information about Cliffs and Alpha? |
|
A: |
|
You can find more information about Cliffs and Alpha from
various sources described under Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 239. |
7
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all of the
information that is important to you. You should carefully read
this entire document and the other documents to which this
document refers to fully understand the merger and the related
transactions. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 239. Most items in this
summary include a page reference directing you to a more
complete description of those items.
Information
about Cliffs
Founded in 1847, Cliffs is an international mining company, the
largest producer of iron ore pellets in North America and a
supplier of metallurgical coal to the global steelmaking
industry. Cliffs operates six iron ore mines in Michigan,
Minnesota and Eastern Canada, and three coking coal mines in
West Virginia and Alabama. Cliffs also owns a majority control
interest in Portman Limited, or Portman, a large iron ore mining
company in Australia, serving the Asian iron ore markets with
direct-shipping fines and lump ore. In addition, Cliffs has a
30 percent interest in MMX Amapá Mineração
Limitada, a Brazilian iron ore project, which is referred to as
Amapá, and a 45 percent economic interest in the
Sonoma Coal Project, an Australian coking and thermal coal
project, which is referred to as Sonoma. Cliffs principal
executive offices are located at: 1100 Superior Avenue,
Cleveland, Ohio 44114, and its telephone number is:
(216) 694-5700.
Information
about Alpha
Alpha is a leading Appalachian coal supplier. Alpha produces,
processes and sells steam and metallurgical coal from eight
regional business units, which, as of June 30, 2008, were
supported by 32 active underground mines, 26 active surface
mines and 11 preparation plants located throughout Virginia,
West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania, as well as a road
construction business in West Virginia and Virginia that
recovers coal. Alpha also sells coal produced by others, the
majority of which Alpha processes
and/or
blends with coal produced from its mines prior to resale,
providing Alpha with a higher overall margin for the blended
product than if Alpha had sold the coals separately.
Alphas principal executive offices are located at: One
Alpha Place, P.O. Box 2345, Abingdon, Virginia 24212,
and its telephone number is:
(276) 619-4410.
The
Merger
On July 15, 2008, each of the boards of directors of Cliffs
and Alpha approved the merger of merger sub, a newly formed and
wholly-owned subsidiary of Cliffs, with and into Alpha, upon the
terms and subject to the conditions contained in the merger
agreement. Alpha will be the surviving company after the merger
and will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cliffs. Under
certain circumstances, the merger may be restructured so that
merger sub will be converted from a Delaware corporation into a
Delaware limited liability company, Alpha Merger Sub, LLC, and
Alpha will merge with and into Alpha Merger Sub, LLC, with Alpha
Merger Sub, LLC as the surviving company. The effects of the
merger, if it is restructured in this way, are described in
Annex G. Any such restructuring will not affect the
merger consideration to be received by holders of Alpha common
stock.
We encourage you to read the merger agreement, which governs the
merger and is attached as Annex A to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, because it sets forth the terms of
the merger.
Merger
Consideration
(page 82)
In the merger, holders of Alpha common stock (other than shares
of Alpha common stock held by any dissenting Alpha stockholder
that has properly exercised appraisal rights in accordance with
Delaware law, held in treasury by Alpha or owned by Cliffs) will
be entitled to receive for each share of Alpha common stock
(which will be cancelled in the merger):
|
|
|
|
|
$22.23 in cash, without interest; and
|
|
|
|
0.95 of a fully paid, nonassessable common share of Cliffs.
|
8
As a result, Cliffs will issue approximately 70,000,000 common
shares of Cliffs and pay approximately $1.7 billion in cash
in the merger, based upon the number of shares of Alpha common
stock outstanding on the record date for the Alpha special
meeting. We refer to the share and cash consideration to be paid
to Alpha stockholders by Cliffs as the merger consideration.
The total value of the merger consideration that an Alpha
stockholder receives in the merger may vary. The value of the
cash portion of the merger consideration is fixed at $22.23 for
each share of Alpha common stock. The share portion of the
merger consideration is similarly fixed at 0.95 of a common
share of Cliffs to be exchanged for each share of Alpha common
stock, but its value may vary due to changes in the market value
of Cliffs common shares.
No fractional common shares of Cliffs will be issued in the
merger. Any holder of Alpha common stock that would otherwise be
entitled to receive fractional common shares of Cliffs as a
result of the exchange of Alpha common stock for Cliffs common
shares will receive, in lieu of any fractional shares, an amount
in cash, without interest, equal to the fractional share
interest multiplied by the closing price for a common share of
Cliffs as reported on the NYSE Composite Transactions Reports as
of the closing date of the merger or, if such date is not a
trading day, the trading day immediately preceding the closing
date of the merger.
Financing
of the
Merger
(page 93)
Cliffs will fund the cash portion of the merger consideration
with cash from committed debt financing in the form of a senior
unsecured term loan facility for up to $1.9 billion and
cash from operations.
Alphas
Reasons for the
Merger
(beginning on page 59)
In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and
recommend the merger to its stockholders, the Alpha board of
directors consulted with Alphas management, as well as
Alphas legal and financial advisors, and considered a
number of factors, including those listed in The
Merger Alphas Reasons for the Merger and
Recommendation of Alphas Board of Directors
beginning on page 59.
Cliffs
Reasons for the
Merger
(beginning on page 61)
In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and to
recommend that Cliffs shareholders adopt the merger agreement
and approve the issuance of Cliffs common shares in connection
with the merger, the Cliffs board of directors consulted with
Cliffs management, as well as Cliffs legal and
financial advisors, and considered a number of factors,
including those listed in The Merger
Cliffs Reasons for the Merger and Recommendation of
Cliffs Board of Directors beginning on page 61.
Effect
of the Merger on Alpha Equity
Awards
(page 107)
In general, upon completion of the merger, options to purchase
shares of Alpha common stock will be converted into options to
purchase common shares of Cliffs. Cliffs has agreed to assume
each of Alphas stock option plans at the effective time of
the merger. Each unvested Alpha stock option outstanding under
any Alpha stock option plan will become fully vested and
exercisable in connection with the merger.
Restricted shares of Alpha common stock granted by Alpha to its
employees and directors will become fully vested in connection
with the merger and the holders thereof will be entitled to
receive the merger consideration with respect to such vested
shares upon completion of the merger.
Performance shares of Alpha common stock granted by Alpha to its
employees will vest according to the terms of the applicable
performance share agreement, and the holder of each performance
share agreement will be entitled to receive an amount in cash
equal to the product of (i) the sum of (A) $22.23 plus
(B) the product of 0.95 multiplied by the closing price for
a common share of Cliffs as reported on the NYSE Composite
Transactions Reports on the closing date of the merger or, if
such date is not a trading day, the trading day immediately
preceding the closing date of the merger, multiplied by
(ii) the number of shares of Alpha common stock that would
be issuable under such performance share agreement.
9
For a full description of the treatment of Alpha equity awards,
see The Merger Agreement Covenants and
Agreements Effect of the Merger on Alpha Equity
Awards on page 107.
Recommendations
of the Boards of Directors to Alpha Stockholders and Cliffs
Shareholders
Alpha Stockholders. The Alpha board of
directors believes that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
merger, are advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of,
Alpha and its stockholders and has approved the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement,
including the merger. The Alpha board of directors has resolved
to recommend that Alpha stockholders vote
for
the adoption of the merger agreement.
Cliffs Shareholders. The Cliffs board of
directors believes that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
merger, are advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of,
Cliffs and its shareholders and has approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger. The Cliffs board of directors
has resolved to recommend that Cliffs shareholders vote
for
the adoption of the merger agreement and the
approval of the issuance of Cliffs common shares pursuant to the
merger agreement.
Opinions
of Financial Advisors (beginning on page 64 for
Alphas financial advisor and page 75 for Cliffs
financial advisor)
Opinion of Alphas Financial Advisor. In
deciding to approve the merger agreement, the Alpha board of
directors considered the oral opinion of Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., which is referred to as Citi, financial advisor to
the Alpha board of directors, delivered on July 15, 2008,
which was subsequently confirmed in writing on the same date, to
the effect that, as of the date of the opinion and based upon
and subject to the considerations and limitations set forth in
the opinion, its work described below and other factors it
deemed relevant, the merger consideration was fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Alpha common stock.
The full text of Citis opinion, which sets forth the
assumptions made, general procedures followed, matters
considered and limits on the review undertaken, is included as
Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Holders of Alpha common stock are urged to read the Citi opinion
carefully and in its entirety, as well as the information set
forth under Risk Factors beginning on page 27.
Citi provided its opinion for the information and assistance of
the Alpha board of directors in connection with its
consideration of the merger. Neither Citis opinion nor the
related analyses constituted a recommendation of the proposed
merger to the Alpha board of directors. Citi makes no
recommendation to any stockholder regarding how such stockholder
should vote with respect to the merger. For its services to
date, Citi has been paid a customary fee, and will be entitled
to receive a transaction fee upon the completion of the merger.
In addition, in the event that the merger is not completed and
Alpha receives termination or
break-up
fees, Citi will be entitled to a portion of such fees.
Opinion of Cliffs Financial Advisor. In
connection with the merger, the Cliffs board of directors
retained J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., which is referred to
as J.P. Morgan, as its financial advisor. In deciding to
approve the merger, the Cliffs board of directors considered the
oral opinion of J.P. Morgan provided to the Cliffs board of
directors on July 15, 2008, subsequently confirmed in
writing on the same date, that, as of the date of the opinion
and based upon and subject to the various factors and
assumptions set forth in the written opinion, the consideration
to be paid by Cliffs to Alpha stockholders in the proposed
merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to Cliffs. The
full text of J.P. Morgans written opinion, dated
July 15, 2008, is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex C. Cliffs shareholders
are urged to read the J.P. Morgan opinion carefully in its
entirety for a description of, among other things, the
assumptions made, general procedures followed, matters
considered and limitations on the scope of the review undertaken
by J.P. Morgan in conducting its financial analysis and
rendering its opinion. J.P. Morgans opinion is
addressed to the Cliffs board of directors and is one of many
factors considered by the Cliffs board of directors in deciding
to approve the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. J.P. Morgan provided its opinion for the
information and assistance of the Cliffs board of directors in
connection with its consideration of the merger, and the opinion
does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of Alpha
common stock or Cliffs common shares as to how that holder
should vote or act on any matter relating to the merger. For its
services, J.P. Morgan will be entitled to receive a
transaction fee, the principal portion of which is payable upon
the completion of the merger. In addition, in the event Alpha
pays a
break-up fee
or other payment to Cliffs
10
following or in connection with the termination, abandonment or
failure to consummate the merger, J.P. Morgan will be
entitled to a portion of such fee or other payment.
Record
Date; Outstanding Shares; Shares Entitled to Vote (page 40
for Alpha and page 44 for Cliffs)
Alpha Stockholders. The record date for the
meeting of Alpha stockholders is October 10, 2008. This
means that you must have been a stockholder of record of
Alphas common stock at the close of business on
October 10, 2008, in order to vote at the special meeting.
You are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock you
own. On Alphas record date, there were
70,495,814 shares of common stock (no shares of treasury
stock) outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting.
Cliffs Shareholders. The record date for the
meeting of Cliffs shareholders is October 6, 2008. This
means that you must have been a shareholder of record of
Cliffs common shares or
Series A-2
preferred stock at the close of business on October 6,
2008, in order to vote at the special meeting. You are entitled
to one vote for each common share or share of
Series A-2
preferred stock you own. On Cliffs record date,
Cliffs voting securities carried 113,502,668 votes, which
consisted of 113,502,463 common shares (excluding
21,121,065 shares of treasury stock) and 205 shares of
Series A-2
preferred stock.
Stock
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers (page 82 for
Alpha and Cliffs)
Alpha. At the close of business on the record
date for the Alpha special meeting, directors and executive
officers of Alpha beneficially owned and were entitled to vote
approximately 651,036 shares of Alpha common stock,
collectively representing 0.92% of the shares of Alpha common
stock outstanding on that date.
Cliffs. At the close of business on the record
date for the Cliffs special meeting, directors and executive
officers of Cliffs beneficially owned and were entitled to vote
approximately 1,574,181 common shares of Cliffs, collectively
representing approximately 1.39% of the common shares of Cliffs
outstanding on that date. Directors and executive officers of
Cliffs did not hold any shares of
Series A-2
preferred stock as of the close of business on the record date.
Ownership
of the Combined Company After the Merger (beginning on
page 82)
Based on the number of common shares of Cliffs and shares of
Alpha common stock outstanding on their respective record dates,
and assuming that Cliffs will issue approximately
70,000,000 common shares of Cliffs in the merger, after the
merger, former Alpha stockholders are expected to own
approximately 37% of the then-outstanding common shares of
Cliffs.
Interests
of Alpha Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
(beginning on page 83)
Alphas executive officers and members of the Alpha board
of directors, in their capacities as such, may have financial
interests in the merger that are in addition to or different
from their interests as stockholders of Alpha generally.
Alphas board of directors was aware of these interests and
considered them, among other matters, in approving the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Listing
of Cliffs Common Shares and Delisting of Alpha Common Stock
(page 86)
Application will be made to have the common shares of Cliffs
issued in the merger approved for listing on the NYSE, where
Cliffs common shares currently are traded under the symbol
CLF. If the merger is completed, Alpha common stock
will no longer be listed on the NYSE and will be deregistered
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which is
referred to as the Exchange Act, and Alpha may no longer file
periodic reports with the SEC.
Appraisal
Rights of Alpha Stockholders (beginning on
page 87)
Holders of Alpha common stock who do not wish to accept the
consideration payable pursuant to the merger may seek, under
Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, which we refer to as the DGCL, judicial appraisal of
the fair value of their shares by the Delaware Court of
Chancery. This value could be
11
more than, less than or the same as the merger consideration for
the Alpha common stock. Failure to strictly comply with all the
procedures required by Section 262 of the DGCL will result
in a loss of the right to appraisal.
Merely voting against adoption of the merger agreement will not
preserve the right of Alpha stockholders to appraisal under
Delaware law. Also, because a submitted proxy not marked
against or abstain will be voted
for the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, the
submission of a proxy not marked against or
abstain will result in the waiver of appraisal
rights. Alpha stockholders who hold shares in the name of a
broker or other nominee must instruct their nominee to take the
steps necessary to enable them to demand appraisal for their
shares.
Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus
contains the full text of Section 262 of the DGCL, which
relates to the rights of appraisal. We encourage you to read
these provisions carefully and in their entirety.
Dissenters
Rights of Cliffs Shareholders (beginning on
page 90)
Cliffs shareholders who (1) are record holders of the
Cliffs shares as of the record date; (2) do not vote to
adopt the merger agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs
common shares in the merger, and (3) deliver a written
demand for payment of the fair cash value of their Cliffs shares
not later than ten days after the Cliffs special meeting, will
be entitled, if and when the merger is completed, to receive the
fair cash value of their Cliffs shares. The right as a Cliffs
shareholder to receive the fair cash value of Cliffs shares,
however, is contingent upon strict compliance by the dissenting
Cliffs shareholder with the procedures set forth in
Section 1701.85 of the Ohio General Corporation Law. If you
wish to submit a written demand for payment of the fair cash
value of your Cliffs shares, you should deliver your demand no
later than December 1, 2008.
Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus
contains the full text of Section 1701.85 of the Ohio
General Corporation Law, which relates to the dissenters
rights of Cliffs shareholders. We encourage you to read these
provisions carefully and in their entirety.
Conditions
to Completion of the Merger (page 92)
Completion of the merger depends on a number of conditions being
satisfied or waived. These conditions include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement by the Alpha stockholders at
the Alpha special meeting;
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the issuance of
Cliffs common shares pursuant to the terms of the merger
agreement by the Cliffs shareholders at the Cliffs special
meeting;
|
|
|
|
the waiting period (including any extension thereof) applicable
to the consummation of the merger under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Act, which is referred to as the HSR Act, must have expired or
been terminated, and antitrust clearance in Turkey must have
been obtained;
|
|
|
|
making or obtaining consents, approvals, and actions of, filings
with and notices to, the governmental entities required to
consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement, the failure of which to be made or
obtained is reasonably expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on Cliffs or Alpha;
|
|
|
|
absence of any order or law of any governmental authority
preventing the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
approval for listing on the NYSE, upon official notice of
issuance, of Cliffs common shares to be issued in connection
with the merger;
|
|
|
|
continued effectiveness of the registration statement of which
this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part and the absence
of any stop order or proceeding seeking a stop order by the SEC
suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement;
|
|
|
|
accuracy of each partys representations and warranties in
the merger agreement, except as would not reasonably be expected
to have or result in a material adverse effect on the party
making the representations;
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
performance in all material respects of each partys
covenants set forth in the merger agreement required to be
performed by it at or prior to the closing date of the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
delivery by both parties of customary officers
certificates and tax opinions.
|
Antitrust
Clearances (page 92)
The completion of the merger is subject to compliance with the
HSR Act. The notifications required under the HSR Act to the
U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which is referred to as the
FTC, and the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of
Justice, which is referred to as the Antitrust Division, were
filed on July 25, 2008. On August 22, 2008, the FTC
granted an early termination of the waiting period under the HSR
Act without the imposition of any conditions or restrictions on
the consummation of the merger.
In addition, Cliffs and Alpha were required to submit a
pre-merger notification in Turkey and obtain antitrust clearance
from the Turkish Competition Authority. The pre-merger
notification in Turkey was submitted on August 19, 2008,
and the antitrust clearance was granted by the Turkish
Competition Authority effective as of September 11, 2008.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement (beginning on page 110)
Cliffs and Alpha may agree in writing to terminate the merger
agreement at any time without completing the merger, even after
the Alpha stockholders have approved the adoption of the merger
agreement and the Cliffs shareholders have adopted the merger
agreement and approved the issuance of Cliffs common shares in
connection with the merger.
The merger agreement may also be terminated at any time before
the effective time of the merger under the following
circumstances, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
by either Cliffs or Alpha if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger is not consummated by January 15, 2009, which
date can be extended under certain circumstances to
April 15, 2009 (we refer to such date, as possibly
extended, as the outside date), unless the failure to consummate
the merger by the outside date is the result of a breach of the
merger agreement by the party seeking the termination or if such
party has not yet held its special meeting of shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the shareholders of Cliffs have voted and failed to adopt the
merger agreement and approve the issuance of common shares of
Cliffs pursuant to the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the Alpha stockholders have voted and failed to adopt the merger
agreement; or
|
|
|
|
the other party breaches its representations or warranties or
breaches or fails to perform its covenants set forth in the
merger agreement, which breach or failure to perform results in
a failure of certain of the conditions to the completion of the
merger being satisfied and such breach or failure to perform is
not cured within 30 days after the receipt of written
notice thereof or is incapable of being cured by the outside
date; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to the receipt of its stockholders approval of the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement, Alpha (i) receives
an unsolicited written proposal after the date of the merger
agreement concerning a business combination or acquisition of
Alpha that the Alpha board of directors determines in its good
faith judgment constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to
lead to, a proposal that is more favorable to the Alpha
stockholders than the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, (ii) the Alpha board of directors determines in
good faith that failure to take such action would be reasonably
likely to be a violation of its fiduciary duties to Alpha
stockholders under applicable Delaware law, (iii) provides
Cliffs with a written notice that it intends to take such
action, (iv) satisfies the conditions for withdrawing (or
modifying in a manner adverse to Cliffs) the recommendation by
its board of directors of the merger or recommending such
superior proposal, and (v) concurrently with the
termination of the merger
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
agreement, enters into an acquisition agreement with a third
party providing for the implementation of the transactions
contemplated by such superior proposal; provided that Alpha pays
a $350 million termination fee to Cliffs and such superior
proposal did not result from Alphas breach of its
non-solicitation obligations under the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs materially breaches its covenants to convene the Cliffs
special meeting or breaches its obligations to recommend that
the Cliffs shareholders vote in favor of the adoption of the
merger agreement and the issuance of common shares in connection
with the merger; or
|
|
|
|
the Cliffs board of directors or any committee thereof
(i) withdraws or modifies, or publicly proposes to withdraw
or modify, its recommendation that Cliffs shareholders
adopt the merger agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs
common shares in connection with the merger, or
(ii) recommends, adopts or approves, or proposes publicly
to recommend, adopt or approve certain transactions involving
Cliffs; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha materially breaches its obligations not to solicit
alternative takeover proposals or materially breaches its
covenants to convene the Alpha special meeting or breaches its
obligations to recommend that the Alpha stockholders vote in
favor of the adoption of the merger agreement; or
|
|
|
|
the Alpha board of directors or any committee thereof
(i) withdraws or adversely modifies or publicly proposes to
withdraw or adversely modify, its recommendation of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, or (ii) recommends, adopts
or approves, or proposes publicly to recommend, adopt or approve
a takeover proposal other than the merger agreement.
|
Termination
Fees (beginning on page 112)
In connection with the termination of the merger agreement in
certain circumstances involving a takeover proposal by a third
party for Alpha, a change of the Alpha board of directors
recommendation to the Alpha stockholders in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement, or certain breaches of the
merger agreement by Alpha, Alpha will be required to pay Cliffs
a termination fee of $350 million. Similarly, in connection
with the termination of the merger agreement in certain
circumstances involving certain alternative transactions for
Cliffs, a change of the Cliffs board of directors
recommendation to the Cliffs shareholders in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
issuance of Cliffs common shares in connection with the merger,
or certain breaches of the merger agreement by Cliffs, Cliffs
will be required to pay Alpha a termination fee of
$350 million.
Furthermore, each party will have to pay a termination fee of
$100 million to the other party if its stockholders or
shareholders, as applicable, voting at their respective special
meetings, fail to approve the adoption of the merger agreement
(in the case of Alpha) or the adoption of the merger agreement
and the approval of the issuance of common shares of Cliffs in
connection with the merger (in the case of Cliffs), but no such
fee will be payable by such party if the shareholders of both
parties, voting at their respective special meetings, fail to
make such approvals.
Material
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences (beginning on
page 93)
Cliffs and Alpha intend for the merger to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. If the
merger qualifies as a reorganization, the U.S. federal
income tax consequences to Alpha stockholders generally will be
as follows: Alpha stockholders will generally recognize gain
only to the extent of the cash consideration that they receive,
and will not recognize any loss.
Tax matters are complicated, and the tax consequences of the
merger to each Alpha stockholder will depend on the facts of
each shareholders situation. Alpha stockholders are urged
to read carefully the discussion in the section titled
Material United States Federal Income Tax
Consequences beginning on page 93 and to consult
their own tax advisors for a full understanding of the tax
consequences of their participation in the merger.
14
Accounting
Treatment (page 93)
The merger will be accounted for as a business combination using
the purchase method of accounting. Cliffs will be
the acquirer for financial accounting purposes.
Risks
In evaluating the merger, the merger agreement or the issuance
of Cliffs common shares in the merger, you should carefully read
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and especially consider
the factors discussed in the section titled Risk
Factors beginning on page 27.
Comparison
of Rights of Shareholders (beginning on page 217)
As a result of the merger, the holders of Alpha common stock
will become holders of Cliffs common shares and their rights
will be governed by the Ohio General Corporation Law and by
Cliffs amended articles of incorporation and regulations.
Following the merger, Alpha stockholders will have different
rights as shareholders of Cliffs than as stockholders of Alpha.
Some of the material differences in the rights of Alpha
stockholders and Cliffs shareholders include, but are not
limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, amendments to Alphas
certificate of incorporation require approval by Alphas
board of directors and holders of a majority of the voting power
of the corporation (or, in cases in which class voting is
required, by holders of a majority of the voting power of such
class), while amendments to the Cliffs articles of
incorporation require approval by holders of two-thirds of the
voting power of the corporation (or, in cases in which class
voting is required, by holders of two-thirds of the voting power
of such class);
|
|
|
|
the Alpha bylaws may be amended and repealed by the Alpha board
of directors, while the Cliffs board of directors does not have
the power to amend or repeal the Cliffs regulations;
|
|
|
|
while the Alpha stockholders do not have the right to vote
cumulatively in the election of Alphas directors, the
Cliffs shareholders, in contrast, may vote cumulatively in the
election of Cliffs directors; and
|
|
|
|
while any action by Alpha stockholders without a meeting
requires written consent of holders of not less than the minimum
number of votes otherwise required to authorize or take such
action at a meeting of the Alpha stockholders, generally, the
Cliffs shareholders may take action without a meeting only by
unanimous written consent of all shareholders entitled to vote
at such meeting.
|
The foregoing list is not intended to be exhaustive, but, rather
serves as an illustration of some of the material differences in
the rights of Alpha stockholders and Cliffs shareholders. For
further discussion of the material differences between the
rights of Alpha stockholders and Cliffs shareholders, please see
Comparison of Rights of Shareholders beginning on
page 217.
15
FINANCIAL
SUMMARY
Cliffs
Market Price Data and Dividends
Cliffs common shares are traded on the NYSE under the symbol
CLF. The following table shows the high and low
sales prices at any time during the period indicated for Cliffs
common shares as reported on the NYSE. For current price
information, you are urged to consult publicly available sources.
On May 9, 2006, the board of directors of Cliffs approved a
two-for-one stock split of its common shares. The record date
for the stock split was June 15, 2006 with a distribution
date of June 30, 2006. On March 11, 2008, the board of
directors of Cliffs declared a two-for-one stock split of its
common shares. The record date for the stock split was
May 1, 2008 with a distribution date of May 15, 2008.
Accordingly, unless indicated otherwise, all Cliffs common share
and per share amounts in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
that relate to dates prior to the stock splits have been
adjusted retroactively to reflect the stock splits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range of Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
|
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
27.59
|
|
|
$
|
20.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
25.22
|
|
|
|
15.70
|
|
|
|
0.0625
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
20.05
|
|
|
|
16.58
|
|
|
|
0.0625
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
24.74
|
|
|
|
18.42
|
|
|
|
0.0625
|
|
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
32.42
|
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
|
0.0625
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
46.03
|
|
|
|
32.10
|
|
|
|
0.0625
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
45.00
|
|
|
|
28.20
|
|
|
|
0.0625
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
53.15
|
|
|
|
36.75
|
|
|
|
0.0625
|
|
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
63.89
|
|
|
|
38.63
|
|
|
|
0.0875
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
121.95
|
|
|
|
57.32
|
|
|
|
0.0875
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
118.10
|
|
|
|
42.16
|
|
|
|
0.0875
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through October 21, 2008)
|
|
|
53.30
|
|
|
|
22.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, on September 9, 2008, Cliffs declared a
regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.0875 per Cliffs common
share that will be payable on December 1, 2008 to Cliffs
shareholders of record as of the close of business on
November 14, 2008.
The last reported sales prices of Cliffs common shares on the
NYSE on July 15, 2008 and October 21, 2008 were
$111.46 and $34.42, respectively. July 15, 2008 was the
last full trading day prior to the public announcement of the
merger. October 21, 2008 was the last full trading day for
which this information could be calculated prior to the date of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The Cliffs board of directors has the power to determine the
amount and frequency of the payment of dividends. Decisions
regarding whether or not to pay dividends and the amount of any
dividends are based on compliance with the Ohio General
Corporation Law, compliance with agreements governing
Cliffs indebtedness, earnings, cash requirements, results
of operations, cash flows, financial condition and other factors
that the board of directors considers important. While Cliffs
intends to maintain dividends at this level for the foreseeable
future, it cannot assure that it will continue to pay dividends
at this level, or at all.
Under the merger agreement, Cliffs has agreed that, until the
effective time of the merger, it will not declare, set aside or
pay any dividends on, or make any other distributions in respect
of, any of its capital stock, other than regular quarterly cash
dividends with respect to Cliffs common shares not in excess of
$0.25 per share and
Series A-2
preferred stock in accordance with the terms thereof.
16
Alpha
Market Price Data and Dividends
Alpha common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol
ANR. The following table shows the high and low
sales prices at any time during the period indicated for Alpha
common stock on the NYSE. For current price information, you are
urged to consult publicly available sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range of Common Stock
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.60
|
|
|
$
|
19.25
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
27.46
|
|
|
|
17.88
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
20.18
|
|
|
|
14.41
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
17.07
|
|
|
|
14.09
|
|
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
15.85
|
|
|
|
12.32
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
21.07
|
|
|
|
15.43
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
23.50
|
|
|
|
15.92
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
35.20
|
|
|
|
22.78
|
|
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
44.58
|
|
|
|
21.92
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
108.73
|
|
|
|
40.05
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
119.30
|
|
|
|
42.68
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through October 21, 2008)
|
|
|
50.69
|
|
|
|
28.05
|
|
The last reported sales prices Alpha common stock on the NYSE on
July 15, 2008, and October 21, 2008 were $94.92 and
$40.47, respectively. July 15, 2008 was the last full
trading day prior to the public announcement of the merger.
October 21, 2008 was the last full trading day for which
this information could be calculated prior to the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The Alpha board of directors has the power to determine the
amount and frequency of the payment of dividends. Decisions
regarding whether or not to pay dividends and the amount of any
dividends are based on compliance with the DGCL, compliance with
agreements governing Alphas indebtedness, earnings, cash
requirements, results of operations, cash flows, financial
condition and other factors that the board of directors
considers important. Alpha does not currently pay dividends.
While Alpha anticipates that if the merger were not consummated
it would continue not to pay dividends, it cannot assure that is
the case. Under the merger agreement, until the closing of the
merger Alpha is not permitted to declare, set aside or pay any
dividends on, or make any other distributions in respect of, any
of its capital stock.
17
Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Data of Cliffs
The following table shows selected historical financial data for
Cliffs. The selected financial data as of December 31,
2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, and 2003 and for each of the five years
then ended were derived from the audited historical consolidated
financial statements and related footnotes of Cliffs. The data
as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
were derived from Cliffs unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements. In the opinion of management, the
unaudited financial information as of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 includes all adjustments,
consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary to
present fairly the data for such periods. The operating results
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily
indicative of results for the full year ending December 31,
2008.
Detailed historical financial information is included in the
audited consolidated statements of financial position as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2007 and the unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of financial position as of June 30, 2008 and
the related unaudited condensed consolidated statements of
operations and cash flows for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 included elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. You should read the following
selected financial data together with Cliffs historical
consolidated financial statements, including the related notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(b)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007(a)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(b)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
1,503.1
|
|
|
$
|
873.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,275.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,921.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,739.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,203.1
|
|
|
$
|
825.1
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
|
|
|
(994.3
|
)
|
|
|
(681.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1,813.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,507.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1,350.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1,053.6
|
)
|
|
|
(835.0
|
)
|
Other operating income (expense)
|
|
|
(56.6
|
)
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
(80.4
|
)
|
|
|
(48.3
|
)
|
|
|
(32.5
|
)
|
|
|
(31.9
|
)
|
|
|
(38.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
452.2
|
|
|
|
160.8
|
|
|
|
381.6
|
|
|
|
365.7
|
|
|
|
356.5
|
|
|
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
(48.3
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
287.2
|
|
|
|
119.4
|
|
|
|
269.8
|
|
|
|
279.8
|
|
|
|
273.2
|
|
|
|
320.2
|
|
|
|
(34.9
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain and cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
287.2
|
|
|
|
119.4
|
|
|
|
270.0
|
|
|
|
280.1
|
|
|
|
272.4
|
|
|
|
323.6
|
|
|
|
(34.9
|
)
|
Extraordinary gain(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
287.2
|
|
|
|
119.4
|
|
|
|
270.0
|
|
|
|
280.1
|
|
|
|
277.6
|
|
|
|
323.6
|
|
|
|
(32.7
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) applicable to common shares
|
|
|
285.9
|
|
|
|
116.6
|
|
|
|
264.8
|
|
|
|
274.5
|
|
|
|
272.0
|
|
|
|
318.3
|
|
|
|
(32.7
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per common share basic(d)(e)(f)
Continuing operations
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
|
(.43
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes and extraordinary gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
(.40
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per common share diluted(d)(e)(f)
Continuing operations
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
2.92
|
|
|
|
(.43
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes and extraordinary gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share diluted(d)(e)(f)
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
(.40
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,046.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,221.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,075.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,939.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,746.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,232.3
|
|
|
$
|
881.6
|
|
Debt obligations effectively serviced
|
|
|
774.8
|
|
|
|
158.6
|
|
|
|
505.8
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
Net cash from (used by) operating activities
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
|
|
(37.7
|
)
|
|
|
288.9
|
|
|
|
428.5
|
|
|
|
514.6
|
|
|
|
(141.4
|
)
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
Series A-2
preferred stock
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
172.3
|
|
|
|
134.7
|
|
|
|
172.3
|
|
|
|
172.5
|
|
|
|
172.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred shareholders cash dividends
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to common shareholders cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share(d)(e)(f)
|
|
|
.18
|
|
|
|
.13
|
|
|
|
.25
|
|
|
|
.24
|
|
|
|
.15
|
|
|
|
.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
121.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(b)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007(a)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(b)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Iron ore and coal production and sales statistics (tons in
millions North America; tonnes in
millions Asia-Pacific)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production tonnage North American iron ore
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
North American coal
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific iron ore
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production tonnage North American iron ore
(Cliffs share)
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Sales tonnage North American iron ore
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
North American coal
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific iron ore
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding (millions)(d)(e)(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average for period
|
|
|
94.0
|
|
|
|
81.4
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
|
|
86.9
|
|
|
|
85.2
|
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
At period end
|
|
|
102.6
|
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
|
87.2
|
|
|
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
|
|
86.4
|
|
|
|
84.0
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
On July 31, 2007, Cliffs completed the acquisition of
Cliffs North American Coal LLC (formerly PinnOak), a producer of
high-quality, low-volatile metallurgical coal. Results for 2007
include PinnOaks results since the acquisition. |
|
(b) |
|
On April 19, 2005, Cliffs completed the acquisition of
80.4 percent of Portman, an iron ore mining company in
Australia. The acquisition was initiated on March 31, 2005
by the purchase of approximately 68.7 percent of
Portmans outstanding shares. Results for 2005 include
Portmans results since the acquisition. On May 21,
2008, Portman authorized a tender offer to repurchase up to
16.5 million shares, or 9.39 percent of its common
stock, and as a result of the repurchase of shares pursuant to
the tender offer, Cliffs ownership interest in Portman
increased from 80.4 percent to 85.2 percent on
June 24, 2008. See Information about
Cliffs Business Strategic
Transformation on page 115. |
|
(c) |
|
Effective January 1, 2005, Cliffs adopted Emerging Issues
Task Force, or EITF,
04-6,
Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production
in the Mining Industry. |
|
(d) |
|
On March 11, 2008, the Cliffs board of directors declared a
two-for-one stock split of Cliffs common shares. The record date
for the stock split was May 1, 2008 with a distribution
date of May 15, 2008. Accordingly, all common shares and
per share amounts for all periods presented have been adjusted
retroactively to reflect the stock split. |
|
(e) |
|
On May 9, 2006, the board of directors of Cliffs approved a
two-for-one stock split of its common shares. The record date
for the stock split was June 15, 2006 with a distribution
date of June 30, 2006. Accordingly, all common shares and
per share amounts for all periods presented have been adjusted
retroactively to reflect the stock split. |
|
(f) |
|
On November 9, 2004, the board of directors of Cliffs
approved a two-for-one stock split of its common shares. The
record date for the stock split was December 15, 2004, with
a distribution date of December 31, 2004. Accordingly, all
common shares and per share amounts for all periods presented
have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the stock split. |
|
(g) |
|
In 2003, Cliffs recognized a $2.2 million extraordinary
gain in conjunction with the acquisition of the assets of
Eveleth Mines; $3.3 million acquisition and startup costs
for this same mine, renamed United Taconite LLC, which is
referred to as United Taconite, and $8.7 million of
restructuring charges related to a salaried employee reduction
program. |
19
Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Data of Alpha
The following table shows selected historical financial and
other data for Alpha. The selected financial data as of
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, and for the years then
ended has been derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements and related footnotes of Alpha. The selected
historical financial data as of December 31, 2004 and for
the year then ended has been derived from the combined financial
statements of ANR Fund IX Holdings, L.P. and Alpha NR
Holding, Inc. and subsidiaries (the owners of a majority of the
membership interests of ANR Holdings, LLC prior to the
February 11, 2005 restructuring) and the related notes,
which are not included or incorporated by reference in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. The selected historical
financial data as of December 31, 2003 and for the year
then ended has been derived from the audited combined balance
sheet of ANR Fund IX Holdings, L.P. and Alpha NR Holding,
Inc. and subsidiaries, which are not included or incorporated by
reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The data as
of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 has
been derived from Alphas unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements included in Alphas quarterly report
on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008 incorporated by
reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and, in the
opinion of Alphas management, includes all adjustments,
consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary to
present fairly the data for such periods. The operating results
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily
indicative of results for the full year ending December 31,
2008.
Detailed historical financial information included in the
audited consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007
and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity and partners capital and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, are included
in Alphas Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. You should read the following selected
financial data together with Alphas historical
consolidated financial statements, including the related notes,
and the other information contained or incorporated by reference
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You
Can Find More Information beginning on page 239.
Prior period coal revenues and cost of coal sales have been
reclassified to exclude changes in the fair value of coal and
diesel fuel derivatives contracts to conform to current year
presentation. These reclassification adjustments had no effect
on previously reported income from operations or net income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANR Fund IX Holdings,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.P. and Alpha NR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
Holding, Inc. and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and per ton data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal revenues
|
|
$
|
1,077,555
|
|
|
$
|
767,362
|
|
|
$
|
1,647,505
|
|
|
$
|
1,681,434
|
|
|
$
|
1,413,174
|
|
|
$
|
1,079,981
|
|
|
$
|
694,596
|
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
145,187
|
|
|
|
84,799
|
|
|
|
205,086
|
|
|
|
188,366
|
|
|
|
185,555
|
|
|
|
141,100
|
|
|
|
73,800
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
26,385
|
|
|
|
13,778
|
|
|
|
33,241
|
|
|
|
34,743
|
|
|
|
27,926
|
|
|
|
28,347
|
|
|
|
13,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,249,127
|
|
|
|
865,939
|
|
|
|
1,885,832
|
|
|
|
1,904,543
|
|
|
|
1,626,655
|
|
|
|
1,249,428
|
|
|
|
781,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sales (exclusive of items shown separately)
|
|
|
824,635
|
|
|
|
635,204
|
|
|
|
1,371,519
|
|
|
|
1,346,733
|
|
|
|
1,184,092
|
|
|
|
920,359
|
|
|
|
626,265
|
|
Increase in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(23,200
|
)
|
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
(8,926
|
)
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
|
145,187
|
|
|
|
84,799
|
|
|
|
205,086
|
|
|
|
188,366
|
|
|
|
185,555
|
|
|
|
141,100
|
|
|
|
73,800
|
|
Cost of other revenues
|
|
|
23,125
|
|
|
|
10,396
|
|
|
|
25,817
|
|
|
|
22,982
|
|
|
|
23,675
|
|
|
|
22,994
|
|
|
|
12,488
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
89,170
|
|
|
|
73,644
|
|
|
|
159,579
|
|
|
|
140,851
|
|
|
|
73,122
|
|
|
|
55,261
|
|
|
|
35,385
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown separately above)
|
|
|
36,086
|
|
|
|
27,221
|
|
|
|
58,605
|
|
|
|
67,952
|
|
|
|
88,132
|
|
|
|
40,607
|
|
|
|
21,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,095,003
|
|
|
|
830,424
|
|
|
|
1,811,680
|
|
|
|
1,766,482
|
|
|
|
1,554,576
|
|
|
|
1,180,321
|
|
|
|
769,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
154,124
|
|
|
|
35,515
|
|
|
|
74,152
|
|
|
|
138,061
|
|
|
|
72,079
|
|
|
|
69,107
|
|
|
|
11,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANR Fund IX Holdings,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.P. and Alpha NR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
Holding, Inc. and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and per ton data)
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(27,184
|
)
|
|
|
(20,023
|
)
|
|
|
(40,215
|
)
|
|
|
(41,774
|
)
|
|
|
(29,937
|
)
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
(7,848
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,023
|
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(14,669
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous income (expense)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(38,828
|
)
|
|
|
(18,375
|
)
|
|
|
(37,968
|
)
|
|
|
(40,412
|
)
|
|
|
(28,782
|
)
|
|
|
(18,788
|
)
|
|
|
(7,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
115,296
|
|
|
|
17,140
|
|
|
|
36,184
|
|
|
|
97,649
|
|
|
|
43,297
|
|
|
|
50,319
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
15,630
|
|
|
|
4,131
|
|
|
|
8,629
|
|
|
|
(30,519
|
)
|
|
|
18,953
|
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
22,781
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
99,867
|
|
|
|
13,096
|
|
|
|
27,734
|
|
|
|
128,168
|
|
|
|
21,426
|
|
|
|
22,388
|
|
|
|
2,752
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(2,373
|
)
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
99,867
|
|
|
$
|
13,096
|
|
|
$
|
27,734
|
|
|
$
|
128,168
|
|
|
$
|
21,213
|
|
|
$
|
20,015
|
|
|
$
|
2,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share, as adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per basic share
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per diluted share
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) per share(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per basic and diluted share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
406,494
|
|
|
$
|
8,655
|
|
|
$
|
54,365
|
|
|
$
|
33,256
|
|
|
$
|
39,622
|
|
|
$
|
7,391
|
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
Operating and working capital
|
|
|
311,857
|
|
|
|
109,926
|
|
|
|
157,147
|
|
|
|
116,464
|
|
|
|
35,074
|
|
|
|
56,257
|
|
|
|
32,714
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,678,936
|
|
|
|
1,146,198
|
|
|
|
1,210,914
|
|
|
|
1,145,793
|
|
|
|
1,013,658
|
|
|
|
477,121
|
|
|
|
379,336
|
|
Notes payable and long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
545,596
|
|
|
|
445,134
|
|
|
|
446,913
|
|
|
|
445,651
|
|
|
|
485,803
|
|
|
|
201,705
|
|
|
|
84,964
|
|
Stockholders equity and partners capital
|
|
|
666,744
|
|
|
|
364,889
|
|
|
|
380,836
|
|
|
|
344,049
|
|
|
|
212,765
|
|
|
|
45,933
|
|
|
|
86,367
|
|
Statement of cash flows data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
179,437
|
|
|
$
|
102,308
|
|
|
$
|
225,741
|
|
|
$
|
210,081
|
|
|
$
|
149,643
|
|
|
$
|
106,776
|
|
|
$
|
54,104
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(73,851
|
)
|
|
|
(113,763
|
)
|
|
|
(165,203
|
)
|
|
|
(160,046
|
)
|
|
|
(339,387
|
)
|
|
|
(86,202
|
)
|
|
|
(100,072
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
246,543
|
|
|
|
(13,146
|
)
|
|
|
(39,429
|
)
|
|
|
(56,401
|
)
|
|
|
221,975
|
|
|
|
(24,429
|
)
|
|
|
48,770
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(74,207
|
)
|
|
|
(71,655
|
)
|
|
|
(126,381
|
)
|
|
|
(131,943
|
)
|
|
|
(122,342
|
)
|
|
|
(72,046
|
)
|
|
|
(27,719
|
)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANR Fund IX Holdings,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.P. and Alpha NR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
Holding, Inc. and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and per ton data)
|
|
|
Other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Produced/processed
|
|
|
12,264
|
|
|
|
12,323
|
|
|
|
24,203
|
|
|
|
24,827
|
|
|
|
20,602
|
|
|
|
19,069
|
|
|
|
17,199
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
2,521
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
4,189
|
|
|
|
4,090
|
|
|
|
6,284
|
|
|
|
6,543
|
|
|
|
3,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,785
|
|
|
|
13,907
|
|
|
|
28,392
|
|
|
|
28,917
|
|
|
|
26,886
|
|
|
|
25,612
|
|
|
|
21,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons Sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steam
|
|
|
8,337
|
|
|
|
8,586
|
|
|
|
17,565
|
|
|
|
19,050
|
|
|
|
16,674
|
|
|
|
15,836
|
|
|
|
14,809
|
|
Met
|
|
|
6,270
|
|
|
|
4,882
|
|
|
|
10,980
|
|
|
|
10,029
|
|
|
|
10,023
|
|
|
|
9,490
|
|
|
|
6,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,607
|
|
|
|
13,468
|
|
|
|
28,545
|
|
|
|
29,079
|
|
|
|
26,697
|
|
|
|
25,326
|
|
|
|
21,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales realization/ton:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steam
|
|
$
|
50.83
|
|
|
$
|
48.42
|
|
|
$
|
48.75
|
|
|
$
|
48.73
|
|
|
$
|
41.33
|
|
|
$
|
32.66
|
|
|
$
|
27.14
|
|
Met
|
|
$
|
104.27
|
|
|
$
|
72.02
|
|
|
$
|
72.07
|
|
|
$
|
75.09
|
|
|
$
|
72.24
|
|
|
$
|
59.31
|
|
|
$
|
37.35
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
73.77
|
|
|
$
|
56.98
|
|
|
$
|
57.72
|
|
|
$
|
57.82
|
|
|
$
|
52.93
|
|
|
$
|
42.64
|
|
|
$
|
32.14
|
|
Cost of coal sales/ton
|
|
$
|
56.45
|
|
|
$
|
47.16
|
|
|
$
|
48.05
|
|
|
$
|
46.31
|
|
|
$
|
44.35
|
|
|
$
|
36.34
|
|
|
$
|
28.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal margin/ton
|
|
$
|
17.32
|
|
|
$
|
9.82
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
$
|
11.51
|
|
|
$
|
8.58
|
|
|
$
|
6.30
|
|
|
$
|
3.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income or
loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per share is
computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average
number of shares of common stock and dilutive common stock
equivalents outstanding during the periods. Common stock
equivalents include the number of shares issuable on exercise of
outstanding options less the number of shares that could have
been purchased with the proceeds from the exercise of the
options based on the average price of common stock during the
period. Due to the internal restructuring on February 11,
2005 and initial public offering of common stock completed on
February 18, 2005, the calculation of earnings per share
for 2005, 2004, and 2003 reflects certain adjustments, as
described below. |
|
|
|
The numerator for purposes of computing basic and diluted net
income (loss) per share, as adjusted, includes the reported net
income (loss) and a pro forma adjustment for income taxes to
reflect the pro forma income taxes for ANR Fund IX
Holdings, L.P.s portion of reported pre-tax income (loss),
which would have been recorded if the issuance of the shares of
common stock received by ANR Fund IX Holdings, L.P. and
Alpha NR Holding, Inc. in exchange for their ownership in ANR
Holdings in connection with the February 11, 2005
restructuring had occurred as of January 1, 2003. For
purposes of the computation of basic and diluted net income
(loss) per share, as adjusted, the pro forma adjustment for
income taxes only applies to the percentage interest owned by
ANR Fund IX Holding, L.P, the nontaxable affiliate. No pro
forma adjustment for income taxes is required for the percentage
interest owned by Alpha NR Holding, Inc., because income taxes
have already been recorded in the historical results of
operations. Furthermore, no pro forma adjustment to reported net
income (loss) is necessary subsequent to February 11, 2005
because Alpha is subject to income taxes. |
|
|
|
The denominator for purposes of computing basic net income
(loss) per share, as adjusted, reflects the retroactive impact
of the common shares received by ANR Fund IX Holdings, L.P.
and Alpha NR Holding, Inc. in exchange for their ownership in
ANR Holdings in connection with the internal restructuring on a
weighted-average outstanding share basis as being outstanding as
of January 1, 2003. The common shares issued to the
minority interest owners of ANR Holdings in connection with the
internal restructuring, including the immediately vested shares
granted to management, have been reflected as being outstanding
as of February 11, 2005 for purposes of computing the basic
net income (loss) per share, as adjusted. The unvested shares
granted to management on February 11, 2005 that vest
monthly over the two-year period from January 1, 2005 to
December 31, 2006 are included in the basic net income
(loss) per share, as adjusted, computation as they vest on a
weighted-average outstanding share basis starting on
February 11, 2005. The 33,925,000 new shares issued in
connection with the initial public offering have been reflected
as being outstanding since February 14, 2005, |
22
|
|
|
|
|
the date of the initial public offering, for purposes of
computing the basic net income (loss) per share, as adjusted. |
|
|
|
The unvested shares issued to management are considered options
for purposes of computing diluted net income (loss) per share,
as adjusted. Therefore, for diluted purposes, all remaining
unvested shares granted to management are added to the
denominator subsequent to February 11, 2005 using the
treasury stock method, if the effect is dilutive. In addition,
the treasury stock method is used for outstanding stock options,
if dilutive, beginning with the November 10, 2004 grant of
options to management to purchase units in Alpha Coal
Management, LLC that were automatically converted into options
to purchase up to 596,985 shares of Alpha common stock at
an exercise price of $12.73 per share. |
|
|
|
The computations of basic and diluted net income (loss) per
share, as adjusted for 2005, 2004, and 2003 are set forth below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
21,426
|
|
|
$
|
22,388
|
|
|
$
|
2,752
|
|
Deduct: Income tax effect of ANR Fund IX Holdings, L.P.
income from continuing operations prior to internal restructuring
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(1,149
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, as adjusted
|
|
|
21,335
|
|
|
|
21,239
|
|
|
|
2,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(2,373
|
)
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
Add: Income tax effect of ANR Fund IX Holdings, L.P. loss
from discontinued operations prior to internal restructuring
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, as adjusted
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(2,224
|
)
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as adjusted
|
|
$
|
21,124
|
|
|
$
|
19,015
|
|
|
$
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic
|
|
|
55,664,081
|
|
|
|
13,998,911
|
|
|
|
13,998,911
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock grants
|
|
|
385,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
56,049,546
|
|
|
|
13,998,911
|
|
|
|
13,998,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, as adjusted basic and
diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, as adjusted
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, as adjusted
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Pro forma net income (loss) per share gives effect to the
following transactions as if each of these transactions had
occurred on January 1, 2004: the Nicewonder acquisition and
related debt refinancing in October 2005, the February 11,
2005 restructuring and initial public offering in February 2005,
the issuance in May 2004 of $175.0 million principal amount
of 10% senior notes due 2012, and the entry into a
$175.0 million revolving credit facility in May 2004. |
23
Selected
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Data
The following selected unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial data of Cliffs and Alpha give effect to
the merger as if the merger had been completed as of
January 1, 2007, with respect to the pro forma results of
operations data, and as of June 30, 2008, with respect to
the pro forma balance sheet data.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial data should be read in conjunction with the historical
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Cliffs,
which are included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and Alpha, which are incorporated by
reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and the
other information contained or incorporated by reference in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page 239 and Financial
Statements and Information beginning on page F-i.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial data reflect the purchase method of accounting, with
Cliffs treated as the acquirer. The following unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial data reflect adjustments,
which are based upon preliminary estimates, to allocate the
purchase price to Alphas net assets. The purchase price
allocation reflected herein is preliminary, and final allocation
of the purchase price will be based upon the actual purchase
price and the actual assets and liabilities of Alpha as of the
date of the completion of the merger. Accordingly, the actual
purchase accounting adjustments may differ materially from the
pro forma adjustments reflected herein.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial data is presented for illustrative purposes only and
is not necessarily indicative of what the combined
companys actual financial position or results of
operations would have been had the merger been completed on the
dates indicated above. The following unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial data does not give effect to
(1) Cliffs or Alphas results of operations or
other transactions or developments since June 30, 2008,
(2) the synergies, cost savings and one-time charges
expected to result from the merger, or (3) the effects of
transactions or developments, including sales or purchases of
assets, which may occur subsequent to the merger. The foregoing
matters could cause both Cliffs pro forma historical
financial position and results of operations, and the combined
companys actual future financial position and results of
operations, to differ materially from those presented in the
following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Results of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,099.5
|
|
|
$
|
4,910.1
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
|
382.1
|
|
|
|
358.9
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from operations
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
18,343.6
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,537.3
|
|
Notes and non-current obligations
|
|
|
7,556.2
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
9,042.2
|
|
24
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE INFORMATION
The following tables set forth for the periods presented certain
per share data separately for Cliffs and Alpha on a historical
basis, on an unaudited pro forma combined basis per Cliffs
common share and on an unaudited pro forma combined basis per
equivalent share of common stock of Alpha. The following
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial data should
be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto of Cliffs, which are
included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and
Alpha, which are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and the other information contained or
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 239 and Financial
Statements and Information beginning on page F-i.
The unaudited pro forma combined data per Cliffs common share
are based upon the historical weighted average number of Cliffs
common shares outstanding, adjusted to include the estimated
number of Cliffs common shares to be issued in the merger. See
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information beginning on page 226. We have based the
unaudited pro forma combined data per Alpha equivalent common
share on the unaudited pro forma combined per Cliffs common
share amounts, multiplied by the exchange ratio of 0.95. The
exchange ratio does not include the $22.23 per share cash
portion of the merger consideration. This data shows how each
share of Alpha common stock would have participated in the
income from continuing operations and book value of Cliffs if
the companies had always been consolidated for accounting and
financial reporting purposes for all periods presented. These
amounts, however, are not intended to reflect future per share
levels of income from continuing operations and book value of
the combined company.
The following unaudited pro forma data reflect the purchase
method of accounting, with Cliffs treated as the acquirer. The
following unaudited pro forma data reflect adjustments, which
are based upon preliminary estimates, to allocate the purchase
price to Alphas net assets. The purchase price allocation
reflected herein is preliminary, and final allocation of the
purchase price will be based upon the actual purchase price and
the actual assets and liabilities of Alpha as of the date of the
completion of the merger. Accordingly, the actual purchase
accounting adjustments may differ from the pro forma adjustments
reflected herein.
The following unaudited pro forma data are presented for
illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of
what the combined companys actual financial position or
results of operations would have been had the merger been
completed on the dates indicated above. The following unaudited
pro forma data do not give effect to (1) Cliffs or
Alphas results of operations or other transactions or
developments since December 31, 2007, (2) the
synergies, cost savings and one-time charges expected to result
from the merger, or (3) the effects of transactions or
developments, including sales of assets, which may occur
subsequent to the merger. The foregoing matters could cause both
Cliffs pro forma historical financial position and results
of operations, and Cliffs actual future financial position
and results of operations, to differ materially from those
presented in the following unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical per
|
|
|
Historical per
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
|
Share Data
|
|
|
Share Data
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
3.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
.25
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
.25
|
|
|
$
|
.24
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
13.35
|
|
|
$
|
5.79
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical per
|
|
|
Historical per
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
|
Share Data
|
|
|
Share Data
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
At or for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
2.32
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
.0875
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
.0875
|
|
|
$
|
.0831
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
16.02
|
|
|
$
|
9.46
|
|
|
$
|
52.39
|
|
|
$
|
49.77
|
|
COMPARATIVE
MARKET VALUE INFORMATION
The following table presents:
|
|
|
|
|
the closing prices per share and aggregate market value of
Cliffs common shares and Alpha common stock, in each case based
on the last reported sales prices as reported by the NYSE
Composite Transactions Tape, on July 15, 2008, the last
trading day prior to the public announcement of the proposed
merger, and October 21, 2008, the last trading day for
which this information could be calculated prior to the date of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
the equivalent price per share and equivalent market value of
shares of Alpha common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Equivalent(1)
|
|
|
July 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing price per common share
|
|
$
|
111.46
|
|
|
$
|
94.92
|
|
|
$
|
128.12
|
|
Market value of common shares (in billions)(2)
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.69
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
October 21, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing price per common share
|
|
$
|
34.42
|
|
|
$
|
40.47
|
|
|
$
|
54.93
|
|
Market value of common shares (in billions)(3)
|
|
$
|
3.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Alpha equivalent price per share reflects the fluctuating
value of Cliffs common shares that Alpha stockholders would
receive for each share of Alpha common stock if the merger were
completed on either July 15, 2008 or October 21, 2008.
The Alpha equivalent price per share is equal to the sum of
(i) the closing price of a Cliffs common share on the
applicable date multiplied by 0.95 and (ii) $22.23. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on 104,145,300 Cliffs common shares and
70,495,814 shares of Alpha common stock outstanding as of
July 15, 2008 (excluding outstanding shares held in
treasury). |
|
(3) |
|
Based on 113,502,463 Cliffs common shares and
70,495,814 shares of Alpha common stock outstanding as of
October 20, 2008 (excluding outstanding shares held in
treasury). |
26
RISK
FACTORS
In deciding whether to vote for the adoption of the merger
agreement, in the case of Alpha stockholders, or for adoption of
the merger agreement and approval of the issuance of Cliffs
common shares, in the case of Cliffs shareholders, we urge you
to carefully consider all of the information included or
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
See Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 239. You should also read and consider the risks
associated with each of the businesses of Cliffs and Alpha
because these risks will also affect the combined company. The
risks associated with the business of Alpha can be found in the
Alpha Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, which is incorporated
by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In
addition, we urge you to carefully consider the following
material risks relating to the merger, the business of Cliffs
and the business of the combined company.
Risks
Relating to the Merger
Cliffs
may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the
merger, which could reduce Cliffs
profitability.
Cliffs expects that the acquisition of Alpha will result in
certain synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects.
Cliffs, however, may never realize these expected synergies,
business opportunities and growth prospects. Integrating
operations will be complex and will require significant efforts
and expenses on the part of both Cliffs and Alpha. Personnel may
leave or be terminated because of the merger. Cliffs
management may have its attention diverted while trying to
integrate Alpha. In addition, Cliffs may experience increased
competition that limits its ability to expand its business,
Cliffs may not be able to capitalize on expected business
opportunities including retaining Alphas current
customers, assumptions underlying estimates of expected cost
savings may be inaccurate, or general industry and business
conditions may deteriorate. If these factors limit Cliffs
ability to integrate the operations of Alpha successfully or on
a timely basis, Cliffs expectations of future results of
operations, including certain cost savings and synergies
expected to result from the merger, may not be met. In addition,
Cliffs growth and operating strategies for Alphas
business may be different from the strategies that Alpha
currently is pursuing.
Because
the market price of Cliffs common shares will fluctuate, Alpha
stockholders cannot be sure of the value of the merger
consideration they will receive.
In the merger, each share of Alpha common stock (other than
shares of Alpha common stock held by any dissenting Alpha
stockholder that has properly exercised appraisal rights in
accordance with Delaware law, shares of Alpha common stock held
in treasury by Alpha or shares of Alpha common stock owned by
Cliffs) will be converted into the right to receive $22.23 in
cash and 0.95 of a common share of Cliffs. The price of Cliffs
common shares at the closing date of the merger or when the
Cliffs common shares are received by Alpha stockholders may vary
from their respective prices on the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus
and on the date of the Alpha special meeting. As a result,
Cliffs shareholders and Alpha stockholders will not know the
exact value of the Cliffs common shares that will be issued in
the merger at the time they vote on the merger proposals. Share
price changes may result from a variety of factors, including
general market and economic conditions, changes in Cliffs
and Alphas respective businesses, operations and
prospects, and regulatory considerations. Many of these factors
are beyond Cliffs and Alphas control. For instance,
as a result of the recent deterioration of general economic
conditions and the intensification of the credit crisis both in
the U.S. and worldwide, the market price for both Alphas
shares of common stock and Cliffs common shares has
declined significantly during the last month. You should obtain
current market quotations for Cliffs common shares and shares of
Alpha common stock.
The
market price for Cliffs common shares may be affected by factors
different from, or in addition to, those affecting shares of
Alpha common stock, and the market value of Cliffs common shares
may decrease after the closing date of the merger.
The businesses of Cliffs and Alpha differ in some respects and,
accordingly, the results of operations of the combined company
and the market price of the combined companys common
shares may be affected by factors different from those currently
affecting the independent results of operations of each of
Cliffs and Alpha. In addition, the market value of the common
shares of Cliffs that Alpha stockholders receive in the merger
could decrease following the closing date of the merger. For a
discussion of the business of Cliffs and factors to
consider in
27
connection with its business, please see Information about
Cliffs beginning on page 115 and the documents and
information included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus
or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and listed under the section captioned
Where You Can Find More Information, beginning on
page 239. For a discussion of the business of Alpha and
factors to consider in connection with its business, please see
Information about Alpha on page 142 and the
documents and information incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and listed under the section
captioned Where You Can Find More Information,
beginning on page 239.
Opposition
by Harbinger Capital Partners, a shareholder of Cliffs, and/or
other significant shareholders of Cliffs may prevent completion
of the merger.
The adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
issuance of Cliffs common shares in connection with the merger
require the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes
entitled to be cast by the holders of outstanding common shares
and
Series A-2
preferred stock of Cliffs, voting together as a class. As a
result, the failure of Harbinger Capital Partners Master
Fund I, Ltd. and its affiliates, including Harbinger
Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P., which are
collectively referred to as Harbinger Capital Partners and
which, based on information provided in Amendment No. 1 to
Schedule 13D filed by Harbinger Capital Partners with the
SEC on August 14, 2008, collectively were the beneficial
owners of 16,616,472 common shares of Cliffs as of
October 6, 2008, the record date for the Cliffs special
meeting (constituting approximately 14.64% of the Cliffs common
shares issued and outstanding as of October 6, 2008, the
record date for the Cliffs special meeting), to vote in favor of
the adoption of the merger agreement and the issuance of Cliffs
common shares in connection with the merger would significantly
decrease the likelihood that the merger will be completed. On a
number of occasions Harbinger Capital Partners indicated that it
did not believe that the merger would be in the best interests
of Cliffs shareholders.
On August 14, 2008, Harbinger Capital Partners delivered to
Cliffs an acquiring person statement pursuant to
Section 1701.831 of the Ohio General Corporation Law, or
the Ohio Control Share Acquisition Statute, pertaining to a
proposed acquisition by Harbinger Capital Partners of that
number of the Cliffs common shares that when added to all other
shares in respect of which Harbinger Capital Partners may
exercise or direct the exercise of voting power in the election
of the Cliffs directors would equal one-fifth or more (but less
than one-third) of such voting power, which proposed acquisition
is referred to as the Harbinger control share acquisition
proposal.
Pursuant to the Ohio Control Share Acquisition Statute, the
Harbinger control share acquisition proposal had to be approved
by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all
Cliffs shares entitled to vote in the election of the Cliffs
directors represented at the special meeting (excluding the
voting power of all interested shares (within the
meaning of the Ohio Control Share Acquisition Statute)) convened
by Cliffs pursuant to the requirements of the Ohio Control Share
Acquisition Statute. The special meeting of the Cliffs
shareholders to consider the Harbinger control share acquisition
proposal took place on October 3, 2008. On October 10,
2008, Cliffs announced that, based on the results provided by
the independent inspector of elections, IVS Associates, Inc.,
Cliffs shareholders rejected the Harbinger control share
acquisition proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if
Harbinger Capital Partners
and/or other
significant shareholders of Cliffs oppose the merger, then
Cliffs ability to obtain its required shareholder approval
will be adversely affected.
Furthermore, if Cliffs shareholders fail to adopt the merger
agreement and approve the issuance of the Cliffs common shares
in connection with the merger, pursuant to the merger agreement,
Cliffs will have to pay to Alpha a termination fee of
$100 million (provided that no such fee will be required to
be paid by Cliffs if the Alpha stockholders also fail to adopt
the merger agreement at their special meeting).
Cliffs
shareholders ownership percentage after the merger will be
diluted and the merger could result in dilution to Cliffs
earnings per share.
In connection with the merger, Cliffs will issue to Alpha
stockholders Cliffs common shares. As a result of this share
issuance, Cliffs shareholders will own a smaller percentage of
the combined company. It is estimated that, upon completion of
the merger, Cliffs shareholders will own approximately 63% of
the outstanding stock of the combined company and Alpha
stockholders will own approximately 37% of the outstanding stock
of the combined company. If the combined company is unable to
realize the strategic and financial benefits currently
anticipated to
28
result from the merger, then Cliffs shareholders could
experience dilution of their economic interest in Cliffs
without receiving a commensurate benefit. The merger could also
result in dilution to Cliffs earnings per share.
Obtaining
required approvals and satisfying closing conditions may prevent
or delay completion of the merger.
The merger is subject to customary conditions to closing. These
closing conditions include, among others, the receipt of
required approvals of the stockholders of Alpha and shareholders
of Cliffs and the receipt of certain governmental consents and
approvals. No assurance can be given that the required
shareholder and governmental consents and approvals will be
obtained or that the required conditions to closing will be
satisfied, and, if all required consents and approvals are
obtained and the conditions are satisfied, no assurance can be
given as to the terms, conditions and timing of the consents and
approvals. Cliffs and Alpha will also be obligated to pay
certain investment banking, financing, legal and accounting fees
and related expenses in connection with the merger, whether or
not the merger is completed.
The
fairness opinions obtained by Cliffs and Alpha from their
respective financial advisors will not reflect changes in
circumstances between signing the merger agreement and the
completion of the merger.
Cliffs and Alpha have not obtained updated opinions as of the
date of this document from J.P. Morgan, Cliffs
financial advisor, or Citi, Alphas financial advisor.
These opinions speak only as of their respective dates and do
not address the fairness of the merger consideration, from a
financial point of view, at the time the merger is completed.
Changes in the operations and prospects of Cliffs or Alpha,
general market and economic conditions (including the recent
deterioration of general economic conditions and the
intensification of the credit crisis both in the U.S. and
worldwide, as a result of which the market price for both
Alphas shares of common stock and Cliffs common
shares has declined significantly during the last month) and
other factors which may be beyond the control of Cliffs and
Alpha, and on which the fairness opinions were based, may alter
the value of Cliffs or Alpha or the prices of Cliffs common
shares or shares of Alpha common stock by the time the merger is
completed. For a description of the opinions that Cliffs and
Alpha received from their respective financial advisors, please
refer to The Merger Opinion of Cliffs
Financial Advisor beginning on page 75 and The
Merger Opinion of Alphas Financial
Advisor beginning on page 64.
Whether
or not the merger is completed, the announcement and pendency of
the merger could cause disruptions in the businesses of Cliffs
and Alpha, which could have an adverse effect on their
respective businesses and financial results.
Whether or not the merger is completed, the announcement and
pendency of the merger could cause disruptions in the businesses
of Cliffs and Alpha. Specifically:
|
|
|
|
|
current and prospective employees of Alpha will experience
uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company,
which might adversely affect Cliffs and Alphas
ability to retain key managers and other employees; and
|
|
|
|
the attention of management of each of Cliffs and Alpha may be
directed toward the completion of the merger.
|
In addition, Cliffs and Alpha have each diverted significant
management resources in an effort to complete the merger and are
each subject to restrictions contained in the merger agreement
on the conduct of their respective businesses. If the merger is
not completed, Cliffs and Alpha will have incurred significant
costs, including the diversion of management resources, for
which they will have received little or no benefit. Further,
Alpha and Cliffs may be required to pay to the other a
termination fee of either $100 million or $350 million
if the merger agreement is terminated, depending on the specific
circumstances of the termination. For a detailed description of
the circumstances in which such termination fee will be paid,
see The Merger Agreement Termination
Fees beginning on page 112.
29
Certain
directors and executive officers of Alpha have interests and
arrangements that may be different from, or in addition to,
those of Alpha stockholders.
When considering the recommendation of the Alpha board of
directors with respect to the merger, Alpha stockholders should
be aware that some directors and executive officers of Alpha
have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in
addition to, their interests as stockholders and the interests
of stockholders generally. These interests include, among
others, payments under employment agreements and severance
agreements, acceleration of vesting and exercisability of
options and restricted stock as a result of the merger and the
right to continued indemnification and insurance coverage by
Cliffs for acts or omissions occurring prior to the merger.
As a result of these interests, these directors and executive
officers may be more likely to support and to vote to adopt the
merger agreement than if they did not have these interests.
Shareholders should consider whether these interests may have
influenced those directors and executive officers to support or
recommend adoption of the merger agreement. As of the close of
business on the record date for the Alpha special meeting, Alpha
directors and executive officers were entitled to vote 0.92% of
the then-outstanding shares of Alpha common stock. See The
Merger Interests of Alpha Directors and Executive
Officers in the Merger beginning on page 83.
Risks
Associated with the Cliffs Business
The
current disruption in the credit markets has created uncertainty
and could adversely affect Cliffs business.
The current global financial and credit crisis could adversely
affect Cliffs business and financial results. Some of
Cliffs North American customers have announced
curtailments of production, which could adversely affect the
demand for Cliffs iron ore and coal products. Continuation
or worsening of the current economic conditions, a prolonged
national or regional economic recession or other events that
could produce major changes in demand patterns could have a
material adverse effect on Cliffs sales, margins and
profitability. In addition, as a result of the intensification
of the global credit crisis in the past few weeks, the market
price for Cliffs common shares has declined substantially.
Cliffs is not able to predict the impact the current global
financial and credit crisis will have on its operations and the
industry in general going forward.
If the
rate of steel consumption slows globally, it could lead to
excess global capacity, increasing competition within the steel
industry and increased imports into the United States,
potentially lowering the demand for iron ore and
coal.
The world price of iron ore and coal are strongly influenced by
international demand. Production at Portman, which comprises
Cliffs Asian-Pacific Iron Ore segment, is fully committed
to steel companies in China and Japan. In addition, all 2008
production at Sonoma is committed under supply agreements with
customers in Asia, including China. If the economic growth rate
in China slows, which may be difficult to forecast, less steel
may be used in construction and manufacturing, which could
decrease demand for iron ore and coal. This could adversely
impact the world iron ore and coal markets and Cliffs
operations, specifically, at Portman and Sonoma. A slowing of
the economic growth rate globally leading to overcapacity in the
steelmaking industry could also result in greater exports of
steel out of Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin America, which, if
imported into North America, could decrease demand for
domestically produced steel, thereby decreasing the demand for
iron ore and coal supplied in North America. During 2006, China
became the worlds largest exporter of steel.
Chinas domestic crude steel production climbed
approximately 17 percent in 2007 as compared to 2006. Based
on the American Iron and Steel Institutes Apparent Steel
Supply (excluding semi-finished steel products), imports of
steel into the United States constituted 23.3 percent,
27.3 percent and 21.3 percent of the domestic steel
market supply for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Further,
production of steel by North American integrated steel
manufacturers may also be replaced, to some extent, by
production of substitute materials by other manufacturers. In
the case of some product applications, North American steel
manufacturers compete with manufacturers of other materials,
including plastic, aluminum, graphite composites, ceramics,
glass, wood and concrete. Most of Cliffs term supply
agreements for the sale of iron ore products are
requirements-based or provide for flexibility of volume above a
minimum level. Reduced demand for and consumption of iron ore
products by
30
integrated steel producers have had and may continue to have a
significant negative impact on Cliffs sales, margins and
profitability.
Capacity
expansions within the industry could lead to lower global iron
ore and coal prices or impact Cliffs
production.
The increased demand for iron ore and coal, particularly from
China, has resulted in the major iron ore and metallurgical coal
suppliers increasing their capacity. Many of Cliffs
competitors have announced plans to increase their capacity
through capital expenditures, project expansion and acquisitions
to capitalize on these opportunities. An increase in
Cliffs competitors capacity could result in excess
supply of iron ore and coal, resulting in downward pressure on
prices. A decrease in pricing would adversely impact
Cliffs sales, margins and profitability.
If
steelmakers use methods other than blast furnace production to
produce steel, or if their blast furnaces shut down or otherwise
reduce production, the demand for Cliffs iron ore and coal
products may decrease.
Demand for Cliffs iron ore and coal products is determined
by the operating rates for the blast furnaces of steel
companies. However, not all finished steel is produced by blast
furnaces; finished steel also may be produced by other methods
that do not require iron ore products. For example, steel
mini-mills, which are steel recyclers, generally
produce steel primarily by using scrap steel and other iron
products, not iron ore pellets, in their electric furnaces.
Production of steel by steel mini-mills was approximately
60 percent of North American total finished steel
production in 2007. Steel producers also can produce steel using
imported iron ore or semi-finished steel products, which
eliminates the need for domestic iron ore. Environmental
restrictions on the use of blast furnaces also may reduce
Cliffs customers use of their blast furnaces.
Maintenance of blast furnaces can require substantial capital
expenditures. Cliffs customers may choose not to maintain
their blast furnaces, and some of Cliffs customers may not
have the resources necessary to adequately maintain their blast
furnaces. If Cliffs customers use methods to produce steel
that do not use iron ore and coal products, demand for
Cliffs iron ore and coal products will decrease, which
could adversely affect its sales, margins and profitability.
A
substantial majority of Cliffs sales are made under term
supply agreements, which are important to the stability and
profitability of its operations.
In 2007, more than 95 percent of Cliffs North
American Iron Ore sales volume, the majority of Cliffs
North American Coal sales, and virtually all of Cliffs
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore sales were sold under term supply
agreements. For North American Coal, these agreements typically
cover a twelve-month period and must be renewed each year. The
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore contracts expire in 2010. Cliffs cannot be
certain that it will be able to renew or replace existing term
supply agreements at the same volume levels, prices or with
similar profit margins when they expire. A loss of sales to
Cliffs existing customers could have a substantial
negative impact on Cliffs sales, margins and profitability.
Cliffs North American Iron Ore term supply agreements
contain a number of price adjustment provisions, or price
escalators, including adjustments based on general industrial
inflation rates, the price of steel and the international price
of iron ore pellets, among other factors, that allow Cliffs to
adjust the prices under those agreements generally on an annual
basis. Cliffs price adjustment provisions are weighted and
some are subject to annual collars, which limit its ability to
raise prices to match international levels and fully capitalize
on strong demand for iron ore. Most of Cliffs North
American Iron Ore term supply agreements do not otherwise allow
Cliffs to increase its prices and to directly pass through
higher production costs to its customers. An inability to
increase prices or pass along increased costs could adversely
affect Cliffs margins and profitability.
In
North America, Cliffs depends on a limited number of
customers.
Five customers together accounted for more than 80 percent
of Cliffs North American Iron Ore sales revenues measured
as a percent of product revenues for each of the past three
years. If one or more of these customers were to significantly
reduce their purchases of products from Cliffs, or if Cliffs
were unable to sell products to them on terms as favorable to it
as the terms under its current term supply agreements,
Cliffs North American sales, margins
31
and profitability could suffer materially due to the high level
of fixed costs and the high costs to idle or close mines. The
majority of the iron ore Cliffs manages and produces is for its
own account, and therefore Cliffs relies on sales to its joint
venture partners and other third-party customers for most of its
revenues.
Mine
closures entail substantial costs, and if Cliffs closes one or
more of its mines sooner than anticipated, its results of
operations and financial condition may be significantly and
adversely affected.
If Cliffs closes any of its mines, its revenues would be reduced
unless Cliffs were able to increase production at its other
mines, which may not be possible. The closure of a mining
operation involves significant fixed closure costs, including
accelerated employment legacy costs, severance-related
obligations, reclamation and other environmental costs, and the
costs of terminating long-term obligations, including energy
contracts and equipment leases. Cliffs bases its assumptions
regarding the life of its mines on detailed studies Cliffs
performs from time to time, but those studies and assumptions
are subject to uncertainties and estimates that may not be
accurate. Cliffs recognizes the costs of reclaiming open pits
and shafts, stockpiles, tailings ponds, roads and other mining
support areas based on the estimated mining life of its
property. If Cliffs were to significantly reduce the estimated
life of any of its mines, the mine-closure costs would be
applied to a shorter period of production, which would increase
production costs per ton produced and could significantly and
adversely affect Cliffs results of operations and
financial condition.
A North American mine permanent closure could significantly
increase and accelerate employment legacy costs, including
Cliffs expense and funding costs for pension and other
postretirement benefit obligations. A number of employees would
be eligible for immediate retirement under special eligibility
rules that apply upon a mine closure. All employees eligible for
immediate retirement under the pension plans at the time of the
permanent mine closure also would be eligible for postretirement
health and life insurance benefits, thereby accelerating
Cliffs obligation to provide these benefits. Certain mine
closures would precipitate a pension closure liability
significantly greater than an ongoing operation liability.
Finally, a permanent mine closure could trigger
severance-related obligations, which can equal up to eight weeks
of pay per employee, depending on length of service. No employee
entitled to an immediate pension upon closure of a mine is
entitled to severance. As a result, the closure of one or more
of Cliffs mines could adversely affect its financial
condition and results of operations.
Cliffs
relies on estimates of its recoverable reserves, which is
complex due to geological characteristics of the properties and
the number of assumptions made.
Cliffs regularly evaluates its North American iron ore and coal
reserves based on revenues and costs and updates them as
required in accordance with SEC Industry Guide 7. Portman and
Sonoma have published reserves which follow Joint Ore Reserves
Code in Australia, which is similar to United States
requirements. Changes to the reserve value to make them comply
with SEC requirements have been made. There are numerous
uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves of
Cliffs mines, many of which have been in operation for several
decades, including many factors beyond Cliffs control.
Estimates of reserves and future net cash flows necessarily
depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such
as production capacity, effects of regulations by governmental
agencies, future prices for iron ore and coal, future industry
conditions and operating costs, severance and excise taxes,
development costs and costs of extraction and reclamation, all
of which may in fact vary considerably from actual results. For
these reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable
quantities of mineralized deposits attributable to any
particular group of properties, classifications of such reserves
based on risk of recovery and estimates of future net cash flows
prepared by different engineers or by the same engineers at
different times may vary substantially as the criteria change.
Estimated ore and coal reserves could be affected by future
industry conditions, geological conditions and ongoing mine
planning. Actual production, revenues and expenditures with
respect to Cliffs reserves will likely vary from
estimates, and if such variances are material, Cliffs
sales and profitability could be adversely affected.
32
A
defect in the title or the loss of a leasehold interest in
certain property could limit Cliffs ability to mine its
reserves or result in significant unanticipated
costs.
Cliffs conducts a significant part of its mining operations on
property that it leases. A title defect or the loss of a lease
could adversely affect Cliffs ability to mine the
associated reserves. As such, the title to property that Cliffs
intends to lease or reserves that it intends to mine may contain
defects prohibiting its ability to conduct mining operations. In
order to conduct its mining operations on properties where these
defects exist, Cliffs may incur unanticipated costs. In
addition, some leases require Cliffs to pay minimum royalties.
Cliffs inability to satisfy those requirements may cause
the leasehold interest to terminate.
Cliffs
relies on its joint venture partners in its mines to meet their
payment obligations and is subject to risks involving the acts
or omissions of its joint venture partners when Cliffs is not
the manager of the joint venture.
Cliffs co-owns four of its six North American mines with various
joint venture partners that are integrated steel producers or
their subsidiaries, including ArcelorMittal USA Inc., or
ArcelorMittal USA, and U.S. Steel Canada Inc. (formerly
Stelco Inc.), or U.S. Steel Canada. While Cliffs is the
manager of each of the mines it co-owns, Cliffs relies on its
joint venture partners to make their required capital
contributions and to pay for their share of the iron ore pellets
that Cliffs produces. Most of Cliffs venture partners are
also its customers. If one or more of Cliffs venture
partners fail to perform their obligations, the remaining
venturers, including Cliffs, may be required to assume
additional material obligations, including significant pension
and postretirement health and life insurance benefit
obligations. The premature closure of a mine due to the failure
of a joint venture partner to perform its obligations could
result in significant fixed mine-closure costs, including
severance, employment legacy costs and other employment costs,
reclamation and other environmental costs, and the costs of
terminating long-term obligations, including energy contracts
and equipment leases.
Cliffs cannot control the actions of its joint venture partners,
especially when it has a minority interest in a joint venture
and is not designated as the manager of the joint venture.
Further, in spite of performing customary due diligence prior to
entering into a joint venture, Cliffs cannot guaranty full
disclosure of prior acts or omissions of the sellers or those
with whom Cliffs enters into joint ventures. Most recently,
Cliffs learned that the Brazilian Federal Police have initiated
a criminal investigation into how the Amapá railway
concession was obtained prior to Cliffs involvement in the
project. Such risks could have a material adverse effect on the
business, results of operations or financial condition of
Cliffs joint venture interests.
Cliffs
expenditures for postretirement benefit and pension obligations
could be materially higher than it has predicted if its
underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, if there are mine
closures or Cliffs joint venture partners fail to perform
their obligations that relate to employee pension
plans.
Cliffs provides defined benefit pension plans and other
postretirement benefits to eligible union and non-union
employees, including Cliffs share of expense and funding
obligations with respect to unconsolidated ventures.
Cliffs pension expense and its required contributions to
its pension plans are directly affected by the value of plan
assets, the projected and actual rate of return on plan assets
and the actuarial assumptions Cliffs uses to measure its defined
benefit pension plan obligations, including the rate at which
future obligations are discounted.
Cliffs cannot predict whether changing market or economic
conditions, regulatory changes or other factors will increase
its pension expenses or its funding obligations, diverting funds
Cliffs would otherwise apply to other uses.
Cliffs has calculated its unfunded other postretirement benefits
obligation based on a number of assumptions. Discount rate,
return on plan assets, and mortality assumptions parallel those
utilized for pensions. If Cliffs assumptions do not
materialize as expected, cash expenditures and costs that Cliffs
incurs could be materially higher. Moreover, Cliffs cannot be
certain that regulatory changes will not increase its
obligations to provide these or additional benefits. These
obligations also may increase substantially in the event of
adverse medical cost trends or unexpected rates of early
retirement, particularly for bargaining unit retirees for whom
there is currently no retiree healthcare cost cap. Early
retirement rates likely would increase substantially in the
event of a mine closure.
33
Equipment
and supply shortages may impact Cliffs
production.
The extractive industry has been experiencing long lead times on
equipment, tires, and supply needs due to the increased demand
for these resources. As the global mining industry increases its
capacity, demand for these resources will increase, potentially
resulting in higher prices, equipment shortages, or both.
Cliffs
sales and competitive position depend on the ability to
transport its products to its customers at competitive rates and
in a timely manner.
Disruption of the lake freighter and rail transportation
services because of weather-related problems, including ice and
winter weather conditions on the Great Lakes, strikes, lock-outs
or other events, could impair Cliffs ability to supply
iron ore pellets to its customers at competitive rates or in a
timely manner and, thus, could adversely affect Cliffs
sales and profitability. Similarly, Cliffs coal operations
depend on international freighter and rail transportation
services, as well as the availability of dock capacity, and any
disruptions to such could impair Cliffs ability to supply
coal to its customers at competitive rates or in a timely manner
and, thus, could adversely affect Cliffs sales and
profitability. Further, reduced levels of government funding may
result in a lesser level of dredging, particularly at Great
Lakes ports. Less dredging results in lower water levels, which
restricts the tonnage freighters can haul over the Great Lakes,
resulting in higher freight rates.
Cliffs Asia-Pacific Iron Ore operations are in direct
competition with the major world seaborne exporters of iron ore
and its customers face higher transportation costs than most
other Australian producers to ship its products to the Asian
markets because of the location of its major shipping port on
the south coast of Australia. Further, increases in
transportation costs, decreased availability of ocean vessels or
changes in such costs relative to transportation costs incurred
by Cliffs competitors, could make its products less
competitive, restrict its access to certain markets and have an
adverse effect on its sales, margins and profitability.
Cliffs
operating expenses could increase significantly if the price of
electrical power, fuel or other energy sources
increases.
Operating expenses at all Cliffs mining locations are
sensitive to changes in electricity prices and fuel prices,
including diesel fuel and natural gas prices. In Cliffs
North American Iron Ore locations, for example, these items make
up 24 percent of Cliffs North American Iron Ore
operating costs. Prices for electricity, natural gas and fuel
oils can fluctuate widely with availability and demand levels
from other users. During periods of peak usage, supplies of
energy may be curtailed and Cliffs may not be able to purchase
them at historical rates. While Cliffs has some long-term
contracts with electrical suppliers, it is exposed to
fluctuations in energy costs that can affect its production
costs. Cliffs enters into forward fixed-price supply contracts
for natural gas and diesel fuel for use in its operations. Those
contracts are of limited duration and do not cover all of
Cliffs fuel needs, and price increases in fuel costs could
cause Cliffs profitability to decrease significantly.
Natural
disasters, weather conditions, disruption of energy,
unanticipated geological conditions, equipment failures, and
other unexpected events may lead Cliffs customers, its
suppliers, or its facilities to curtail production or shut down
their operations.
Operating levels within the industry are subject to unexpected
conditions and events that are beyond the industrys
control. Those events could cause industry members or their
suppliers to curtail production or shut down a portion or all of
their operations, which could reduce the demand for Cliffs
iron ore and coal products, and could adversely affect its
sales, margins, and profitability.
For example, one of Cliffs customers shut down a blast
furnace for 52 days in 2007. Additionally, in January of
2008, another customer of Cliffs provided Cliffs with a force
majeure letter due to a fire on the smaller of its two operating
furnaces. In early November 2007, several small cracks were
discovered in a kiln riding ring during routine maintenance at
Cliffs Tilden Mining Company L.C., or Tilden, mine. As a
result of the cracks, a scheduled major repair was extended
approximately 15 days more than expected. Full production
resumed in mid-January 2008. An electrical explosion at
Cliffs United Taconite facility on October 12, 2006
resulted in a temporary production curtailment as a result of a
loss of electrical power. Full production did not resume until
January 2007. In February 2007, severe weather conditions caused
significant ice buildup in the basin supplying water to the
Hibbing
34
Taconite Company, or Hibbing, facility tailings basin. This
caused a production shutdown that lowered first quarter
production output. In August 2007 and March 2008, production at
Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC, or Pinnacle, slowed as a result of
sandstone intrusions encountered within the coal panel being
mined at the time, spreading fixed costs over less production
than planned.
Interruptions in production capabilities will inevitably
increase Cliffs production costs and reduce its
profitability. Cliffs does not have meaningful excess capacity
for current production needs, and it is not able to quickly
increase production at one mine to offset an interruption in
production at another mine.
A portion of Cliffs production costs are fixed regardless
of current operating levels. As noted, Cliffs operating
levels are subject to conditions beyond its control that can
delay deliveries or increase the cost of mining at particular
mines for varying lengths of time. These conditions include
weather conditions (for example, extreme winter weather, floods
and availability of process water due to drought) and natural
disasters, pit wall failures, unanticipated geological
conditions, including variations in the amount of rock and soil
overlying the deposits of iron ore and coal, variations in rock
and other natural materials and variations in geologic
conditions and ore processing changes.
The manufacturing processes that take place in Cliffs
mining operations, as well as in its processing facilities,
depend on critical pieces of equipment. This equipment may, on
occasion, be out of service because of unanticipated failures.
In addition, many of Cliffs mines and processing
facilities have been in operation for several decades, and the
equipment is aged. In the future, Cliffs may experience
additional material plant shutdowns or periods of reduced
production because of equipment failures. Further, remediation
of any interruption in production capability may require Cliffs
to make large capital expenditures that could have a negative
effect on its profitability and cash flows. Cliffs
business interruption insurance would not cover all of the lost
revenues associated with equipment failures. Longer-term
business disruptions could result in a loss of customers, which
could adversely affect Cliffs future sales levels, and
therefore its profitability.
Regarding the impact of unexpected events happening to
Cliffs suppliers, many of Cliffs mines are dependent
on one source for electric power and for natural gas. For
example, Minnesota Power, Inc. is the sole supplier of electric
power to Cliffs Hibbing and United Taconite mines;
Wisconsin Electric Power Company, or WEPCO, is the sole supplier
of electric power to Cliffs Tilden and Empire Iron Mining
Partnership, or Empire, mines; and Cliffs Northshore
Mining Company, or Northshore, mine is largely dependent on its
wholly-owned power facility for its electrical supply. A
significant interruption in service from Cliffs energy
suppliers due to terrorism, weather conditions, natural
disasters, or any other cause can result in substantial losses
that may not be fully recoverable, either from its business
interruption insurance or responsible third parties.
Cliffs
is subject to extensive governmental regulation, which imposes,
and will continue to impose, significant costs and liabilities
on Cliffs, and future regulation could increase those costs and
liabilities or limit Cliffs ability to produce iron ore
and coal products.
Cliffs is subject to various federal, provincial, state and
local laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which Cliffs
has operations on matters such as employee health and safety,
air quality, water pollution, plant and wildlife protection,
reclamation and restoration of mining properties, the discharge
of materials into the environment, and the effects that mining
has on groundwater quality and availability. Numerous
governmental permits and approvals are required for Cliffs
operations. Cliffs cannot be certain that it has been or will be
at all times in complete compliance with such laws, regulations
and permits. If Cliffs violates or fails to comply with these
laws, regulations or permits, it could be fined or otherwise
sanctioned by regulators.
Prior to commencement of mining, Cliffs must submit to and
obtain approval from the appropriate regulatory authority of
plans showing where and how mining and reclamation operations
are to occur. These plans must include information such as the
location of mining areas, stockpiles, surface waters, haul
roads, tailings basins and drainage from mining operations. All
requirements imposed by any such authority may be costly and
time-consuming and may delay commencement or continuation of
exploration or production operations. In addition, new
legislation and regulations and orders, including proposals
related to climate change and protection of the environment, to
which Cliffs would be subject or that would further regulate and
tax Cliffs customers, namely the North American integrated
steel producer customers, may also require Cliffs or its
customers to reduce or
35
otherwise change operations significantly or incur additional
costs. Such new legislation, regulations or orders (if enacted)
could have a material adverse effect on Cliffs business,
results of operations, financial condition or profitability.
Cliffs U.S. operations are subject to Maximum
Achievable Control Technology emissions standards for
particulate matter promulgated by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, which is referred to as the
EPA, under the Clean Air Act effective October 31, 2006.
The EPAs decision not to regulate emissions of mercury or
asbestos in the Maximum Achievable Control Technology Rule is
the subject of a court remand, and the outcome cannot be
predicted.
Further, Cliffs is subject to a variety of potential liability
exposures arising at certain sites where Cliffs does not
currently conduct operations. These sites include sites where
Cliffs formerly conducted iron ore mining or processing or other
operations, inactive sites that Cliffs currently owns,
predecessor sites, acquired sites, leased land sites and
third-party waste disposal sites. Cliffs may be named as a
responsible party at other sites in the future and Cliffs cannot
be certain that the costs associated with these additional sites
will not be material.
Cliffs also could be held liable for any and all consequences
arising out of human exposure to hazardous substances used,
released or disposed of by Cliffs or other environmental damage,
including damage to natural resources. In particular, Cliffs and
certain of its subsidiaries are involved in various claims
relating to the exposure of asbestos and silica to seamen who
sailed on the Great Lakes vessels formerly owned and operated by
certain of Cliffs subsidiaries. The full impact of these
claims, as well as whether insurance coverage will be sufficient
and whether other defendants named in these claims will be able
to fund any costs arising out of these claims, continues to be
unknown.
Underground
mining is subject to increased safety regulation and may require
Cliffs to incur additional cost.
Recent mine disasters have led to the enactment and
consideration of significant new federal and state laws and
regulations relating to safety in underground coal mines. These
laws and regulations include requirements for constructing and
maintaining caches for the storage of additional self-contained
self rescuers throughout underground mines; installing rescue
chambers in underground mines; constant tracking of and
communication with personnel in the mines; installing cable
lifelines from the mine portal to all sections of the mine to
assist in emergency escape; submission and approval of emergency
response plans; and new and additional safety training.
Additionally, new requirements for the prompt reporting of
accidents and increased fines and penalties for violations of
these and existing regulations have been implemented. These new
laws and regulations may cause Cliffs to incur substantial
additional costs, which may adversely impact its operating
performance.
Coal
mining is complex due to geological characteristics of the
region.
The geological characteristics of coal reserves, such as depth
of overburden and coal seam thickness, make them complex and
costly to mine. As mines become depleted, replacement reserves
may not be available when required or, if available, may not be
capable of being mined at costs comparable to those
characteristic of the depleting mines. These factors could
materially adversely affect the mining operations and cost
structures of, and customers ability to use coal produced.
Cliffs
profitability could be negatively affected if it fails to
maintain satisfactory labor relations.
The United Steelworkers, which is referred to as the USW,
represents all hourly employees at Cliffs North American
Iron Ore locations except for Northshore. The United Mineworkers
of America, which is referred to as UMWA, represents hourly
employees at Cliffs North American Coal locations. Cliffs
has entered into an agreement with the USW on a new four-year
labor contract to replace the labor agreement that expired on
September 1, 2008 and that will cover approximately 2,300
USW-represented workers at Empire and Tilden mines in Michigan,
and its United Taconite and Hibbing mines in Minnesota. A
five-year agreement runs until March 2009 with Cliffs
Canadian work force. The current UMWA agreement runs through
2011 at Cliffs coal locations. Hourly employees at the
Cliffs owned railroads that transport products among its
facilities are represented by multiple unions with labor
agreements that expire at various dates. If the collective
bargaining agreements relating to the employees at Cliffs
mines or railroads are not successfully renegotiated prior to
their expiration, Cliffs could face work stoppages or labor
strikes.
36
Cliffs
may encounter labor shortages for critical operational
positions, which could affect its ability to produce iron ore
products.
At many of Cliffs mining locations, many of its mining
operational employees are approaching retirement age. As these
experienced employees retire, Cliffs may have difficulty
replacing them at competitive wages. As a result, wages are
increasing to address the turnover.
Cliffs
profitability could be affected by the failure of outside
contractors to perform.
Portman and Sonoma use contractors to handle many of the
operational phases of their mining and processing operations and
therefore are subject to the performance of outside companies on
key production areas.
Cliffs
failure to maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting may not allow it to accurately report its financial
results, which could cause Cliffs financial statements to
become materially misleading and adversely affect the trading
price of Cliffs common shares.
Cliffs requires effective internal control over financial
reporting in order to provide reasonable assurance with respect
to its financial reports and to effectively prevent fraud.
Internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations,
including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or
overriding of controls, or fraud. Therefore, even effective
internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial
statements. If Cliffs cannot provide reasonable assurance with
respect to its financial statements and effectively prevent
fraud, Cliffs financial statements could become materially
misleading, which could adversely affect the trading price of
Cliffs common shares. Implementing new internal controls and
testing the internal control framework will require the
dedication of additional resources, management time and expense.
If Cliffs fails to maintain an effective internal control
environment and perform timely testing, Cliffs could have a
material weakness with its internal control over financial
reporting. If Cliffs has a material weakness, or a weak control
environment, its business, financial condition and operating
results could be materially impacted.
Cliffs
may be unable to successfully identify, acquire and integrate
strategic acquisition candidates.
Cliffs ability to grow successfully through acquisitions
depends upon its ability to identify, negotiate, complete and
integrate suitable acquisitions and to obtain necessary
financing. It is possible that Cliffs will be unable to
successfully complete potential acquisitions. In addition, the
costs of acquiring other businesses could increase if
competition for acquisition candidates increases. Additionally,
the success of an acquisition is subject to other risks and
uncertainties, including Cliffs ability to realize
operating efficiencies expected from an acquisition, the size or
quality of the resource, delays in realizing the benefits of an
acquisition, difficulties in retaining key employees, customers
or suppliers of the acquired businesses, difficulties in
maintaining uniform controls, procedures, standards and policies
throughout acquired companies, the risks associated with the
assumption of contingent or undisclosed liabilities of
acquisition targets, the impact of changes to Cliffs
allocation of purchase price, and the ability to generate future
cash flows or the availability of financing.
Cliffs
is subject to risks involving operations in multiple
countries.
Cliffs has a strategy to broaden its scope as a supplier of iron
ore and other raw materials to the integrated steel industry in
North American and international markets. As Cliffs expands
beyond its traditional North American base business, it will be
subject to additional risks beyond those risks relating to its
North American operations, such as currency fluctuations; legal
and tax limitations on Cliffs ability to repatriate
earnings in a tax-efficient manner; potential negative
international impacts resulting from U.S. foreign and
domestic policies, including government embargoes or foreign
trade restrictions; the imposition of duties, tariffs, import
and export controls and other trade barriers impacting the
seaborne iron ore and coal markets; difficulties in staffing and
managing multi-national operations; and uncertainties in the
enforcement of legal rights and remedies in multiple
jurisdictions. If Cliffs is unable to manage successfully the
risks associated with expanding its global business, these risks
could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of
operations or financial condition.
37
Cliffs
is subject to a variety of market risks.
These risks include those caused by changes in the value of
equity investments, changes in commodity prices, interest rates
and foreign currency exchange rates. Cliffs has established
policies and procedures to manage such risks, however certain
risks are beyond its control.
Risks
Relating to the Combined Companys Operations After
Consummation of the Merger
In addition to the risks associated with the respective
businesses of Cliffs (see Risks Associated
with the Cliffs Business beginning on page 30) and
Alpha (which are incorporated by reference from Alphas
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007), the following risks
should be considered because they will affect the combined
company.
Cliffs
will take on substantial additional indebtedness to finance the
merger, which may decrease the combined companys business
flexibility and increase its borrowing costs
Upon completion of the merger, Cliffs will incur approximately
$2 billion in additional indebtedness, and will have
consolidated indebtedness that will be substantially greater
than its indebtedness prior to the merger. The increased
indebtedness and higher debt-to-equity ratio of the combined
company in comparison to that of Cliffs immediately prior to the
merger may have the effect, among other things, of reducing the
flexibility of the combined company to respond to changing
business and economic conditions and increasing borrowing costs.
Competition
within the coal industry may adversely affect the combined
companys ability to sell coal.
Coal with lower production costs shipped east from Western coal
mines and from offshore sources has resulted in increased
competition for coal sales in the Appalachian region. This
competition could result in a decrease in the combined
companys market share in this region and a decrease in the
combined companys revenues.
Demand for the combined companys high sulfur coal and the
price that the combined company can obtain for it will be
impacted by, among other things, the changing laws with respect
to allowable emissions and the price of emission allowances.
Significant increases in the price of those allowances could
reduce the competitiveness of high sulfur coal at plants not
equipped to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions. Competition from
low sulfur coal and possibly natural gas could result in a
decrease in the combined companys high-sulfur coal market
share and revenues from those operations.
Overcapacity in the coal industry, both domestically and
internationally, may affect the price the combined company will
receive for its coal. For example, during the 1970s and early
1980s, increased demand for coal and attractive pricing brought
new investors to the coal industry and promoted the development
of new mines. These factors resulted in added production
capacity throughout the industry, which led to increased
competition and lower coal prices. Continued coal pricing at
relatively high levels, compared to historical levels, could
encourage the development of expanded capacity by new or
existing coal producers. Any overcapacity could reduce coal
prices in the future.
The demand for U.S. coal exports is dependent upon a number
of factors outside of the combined companys control,
including the overall demand for electricity in foreign markets,
currency exchange rates, ocean freight rates, the demand for
foreign-produced steel both in foreign markets and in the
U.S. market (which is dependent in part on tariff rates on
steel), general economic conditions in foreign countries,
technological developments, and environmental and other
governmental regulations. If foreign demand for U.S. coal
were to decline, this decline could cause competition among coal
producers in the United States to intensify, potentially
resulting in downward pressure on domestic coal prices.
38
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This joint proxy statement/prospectus, including information and
other documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, contains or incorporates by reference or
may contain or may incorporate by reference
forward-looking statements that have been made
pursuant to the provisions of, and in reliance on the safe
harbor under, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These forward-looking statements, which can be found at
various places throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus
and the other documents incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, are not historical facts, but rather
are based on current expectations, estimates and projections.
Words such as anticipates, expects,
intends, plans, believes,
seeks, could, should,
will, projects, estimates
and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other
factors, some of which are beyond Cliffs and Alphas
control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results
to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the
forward-looking statements. In that event, Cliffs or
Alphas business, financial condition or results of
operations could be materially adversely affected, and investors
in Cliffs or Alphas securities could lose part or
all of their investment. You should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or, in the case of
documents incorporated by reference, the date referenced in
those documents. We are not obligated to update these statements
or publicly release the result of any revision to them to
reflect events or circumstances after the date of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus or, in the case of documents
incorporated by reference, the date referenced in those
documents, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
You should understand that the risks, uncertainties, factors and
assumptions listed and discussed in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including those set forth under the
headings Risk Factors beginning on page 27 and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Cliffs Market
Risks beginning on page 167; the risks discussed in
Cliffs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, in
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk; the risks discussed in Alphas
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007, in item 7A Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, and
Alphas quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008, in Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk; and the following important factors and assumptions,
could affect the future results of the combined company
following the merger, or the future results of Cliffs and Alpha
if the merger does not occur, and could cause actual results or
other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in any forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of Cliffs to integrate the Alpha businesses with
Cliffs businesses and achieve the expected benefits from
the merger;
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement at the Alpha special
meeting;
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the
issuance of Cliffs common shares in connection with the merger
at the Cliffs special meeting;
|
|
|
|
the timing of the completion of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the actual financial position and results of operations of the
combined company following the merger, which may differ
significantly from the pro forma financial data contained in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
changes in demand for iron ore pellets by North American
integrated steel producers, or changes in Asian iron ore demand
due to changes in steel utilization rates, operational factors,
electric furnace production or imports into the United States
and Canada of semi-finished steel or pig iron;
|
|
|
|
the impact of consolidation and rationalization in the steel
industry;
|
|
|
|
timing of changes in customer coal inventories;
|
|
|
|
changes in, renewal of and acquiring new long-term coal supply
arrangements;
|
|
|
|
inherent risks of coal mining beyond the combined companys
control;
|
|
|
|
competition in coal markets;
|
|
|
|
railroad, barge, truck and other transportation performance and
costs;
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
the geological characteristics of Central and Northern
Appalachian coal reserves;
|
|
|
|
availability of mining and processing equipment and parts;
|
|
|
|
the combined companys assumptions concerning economically
recoverable coal reserve estimates;
|
|
|
|
environmental laws, including those directly affecting coal
mining production, and those affecting customers coal
usage;
|
|
|
|
liability for litigation, administrative actions, and similar
disputes;
|
|
|
|
inability to timely obtain permits, comply with government
regulations or make capital expenditures required to maintain
compliance; and
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and regulations.
|
THE ALPHA
SPECIAL MEETING
General
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to Alpha
stockholders as part of a solicitation of proxies by the Alpha
board of directors for use at the special meeting of Alpha
stockholders and at any adjournment thereof. This joint proxy
statement/prospectus is first being furnished to stockholders of
Alpha on or about October 23, 2008. In addition, this joint
proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to Alpha
stockholders as a prospectus for Cliffs in connection with the
issuance by Cliffs of its common shares to Alpha stockholders in
connection with the merger. This joint proxy
statement/prospectus provides Alpha stockholders with
information they need to know to be able to vote or instruct
their vote to be cast at the special meeting of Alpha
stockholders.
Date,
Time and Place of the Alpha Special Meeting
The special meeting of Alpha stockholders will be held at the
offices of Alpha located at One Alpha Place, Abingdon, Virginia
24212, on November 21, 2008, at 11 a.m. E.T.
Purposes
of the Alpha Special Meeting
At the Alpha special meeting, Alphas stockholders will be
asked:
|
|
|
|
|
to adopt the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
to approve adjournments of the Alpha special meeting if
necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are
not sufficient votes at the time of the Alpha special meeting to
approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
|
Record
Date; Outstanding Shares; Shares Entitled to Vote
The record date for the meeting for Alpha stockholders is
October 10, 2008. This means that you must have been a
stockholder of record of Alpha common stock at the close of
business on October 10, 2008, in order to vote at the
special meeting. You are entitled to one vote for each share of
common stock you own. On Alphas record date, there were
70,495,814 shares of Alpha common stock outstanding and
entitled to vote.
A complete list of Alpha stockholders entitled to vote at the
Alpha special meeting will be available for inspection at the
principal place of business of Alpha during regular business
hours for a period of no less than ten days before the special
meeting and at the place of the Alpha special meeting during the
meeting.
Quorum
and Vote Required
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid special
meeting of Alpha. The required quorum for the transaction of
business at the Alpha special meeting is a majority of the
issued and outstanding shares of Alpha common stock entitled to
vote and present at the special meeting, whether in person or by
proxy. The abstentions will be counted in determining whether a
quorum is present at the special meeting. As for broker
non-votes, Alpha expects that there will be practical
impediments that will prevent it from counting them for purposes
of a quorum at the Alpha special meeting because Alpha does not
anticipate that there will be any routine matters on
the agenda for the Alpha special meeting.
40
Adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote
of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Alpha common
stock entitled to vote. The required vote of Alpha stockholders
on the merger agreement is based upon the number of outstanding
shares of Alpha common stock, and not the number of shares that
are actually voted. Accordingly, the failure to submit a proxy
card or to vote in person at the Alpha special meeting or the
abstention from voting by Alpha stockholders, or the failure of
any Alpha stockholder who holds shares in street
name through a bank or broker to give voting instructions
to such bank or broker, will have the same effect as a vote
against the
adoption of the merger agreement.
To approve any adjournment of the Alpha special meeting, if
necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there
are not sufficient votes at the time of the Alpha special
meeting to approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement,
the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Alpha common
stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to
vote at the Alpha special meeting is required regardless of
whether or not a quorum is present. Abstentions will have the
same effect as a vote
against the
proposal to adjourn the special meeting, while broker non-votes
and shares not in attendance at the special meeting will have no
effect on the outcome of any vote to adjourn the special meeting.
As discussed elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
Alpha stockholders are considering and voting on a proposal to
adopt the merger agreement. You should carefully read this joint
proxy statement/prospectus in its entirety for more detailed
information concerning the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the merger. In particular, you are
directed to the merger agreement, which is attached as
Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The Alpha board of directors recommends that Alpha
stockholders vote
for
the adoption of the merger agreement, and your properly signed
and dated proxy will be so voted unless you specify
otherwise.
|
|
ITEM 2
|
APPROVE
ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY, TO PERMIT
FURTHER SOLICITATION OF PROXIES IF THERE ARE NOT SUFFICIENT
VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE ALPHA SPECIAL MEETING TO APPROVE THE
PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT
|
Alpha stockholders may be asked to vote on a proposal to adjourn
the Alpha special meeting, if necessary, to permit further
solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the
time of the Alpha special meeting to approve the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement.
The Alpha board of directors recommends that Alpha
stockholders vote
for
the proposal to adjourn the Alpha special meeting under certain
circumstances, and your properly signed and dated proxy will be
so voted unless you specify otherwise.
Stock
Ownership and Voting by Alphas Directors and Executive
Officers
As of the record date for the Alpha special meeting,
Alphas directors and executive officers had the right to
vote approximately 651,036 shares of the then outstanding
Alpha voting stock at the Alpha special meeting. As of the
record date of the Alpha special meeting, these shares
represented 0.92% of the Alpha common stock outstanding and
entitled to vote at the meeting. We currently expect that
Alphas directors and executive officers will vote their
shares
for
approval and adoption of the merger agreement, although none of
them has entered into any agreement requiring them to do so.
How to
Vote
You may vote in person at the Alpha special meeting or by proxy.
Alpha recommends you submit your proxy even if you plan to
attend the special meeting. If you vote by proxy, you may change
your vote if you attend and vote at the special meeting.
If you own common stock in your own name, you are an owner
of record. This means that you may use the enclosed proxy
card(s) to tell the persons named as proxies how to vote your
shares. If you properly complete, sign and date your proxy
card(s) or submit your proxy by telephone or over the Internet,
your proxy will be voted in accordance with your instructions.
The named proxies will vote all shares at the meeting for which
proxies have been properly submitted (whether by mail, telephone
or over the Internet) and not revoked. If you sign and return
41
your proxy card(s) but do not mark your card(s) to tell the
proxies how to vote your shares on each proposal, your proxy
will be voted as recommended by the Alpha board of directors.
If you hold shares of Alpha common stock in a stock brokerage
account or through a bank, broker or other nominee, or, in other
words, in street name, please follow the voting
instructions provided by that entity. With respect to the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement, if you do not instruct
your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote your shares, your
bank, broker or other nominee will not be authorized to vote
with respect to this proposal and a broker non-vote will occur,
which will have the same effect as a vote
against
the adoption of the merger agreement. In addition, if you
do not instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote
your shares with respect to the proposal to adjourn the meeting
to solicit further proxies to approve the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement, a broker non-vote will occur.
If you abstain from voting with respect to the proposal to adopt
the merger agreement, it will have the same effect as a vote
against
the adoption of the merger agreement. With respect to the
proposal to adjourn the meeting to solicit further proxies to
approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, your
abstention will have the same effect as a vote
against
the proposal to adjourn the special meeting.
If you are an owner of record, you have three voting
options:
|
|
|
|
|
Internet: You can vote over the
Internet at the Web address shown on your proxy card
(http://www.cesvote.com). Internet voting is available
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you vote over the
Internet, do not return your proxy card(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone: In the U.S., Canada and
Puerto Rico, you can vote by telephone by calling the toll-free
number on your proxy card(s). Telephone voting is available
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Easy-to-follow voice
prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your
instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by
telephone, do not return your proxy card(s).
|
|
|
|
Mail: You can vote by mail by simply
signing, dating and mailing your proxy card(s) in the
postage-paid envelope included with this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
A number of banks and brokerage firms participate in a program
that also permits stockholders whose shares are held in
street name to direct their vote by telephone or
over the Internet. If your shares are held in an account at a
bank or brokerage firm that participates in such a program, you
may direct the vote of these shares by telephone or over the
Internet by following the voting instructions enclosed with the
proxy form from the bank or brokerage firm. The Internet and
telephone proxy procedures are designed to authenticate
stockholders identities, to allow stockholders to give
their proxy voting instructions and to confirm that those
instructions have been properly recorded. Votes directed by
telephone or over the Internet through such a program must be
received by 11:59 p.m. E.T. on November 20, 2008.
Directing the voting of your shares will not affect your right
to vote in person if you decide to attend the Alpha special
meeting; however, you must first obtain a signed and properly
executed legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee to
vote your shares held in street name at the special
meeting. Requesting a legal proxy prior to the deadline
described above will automatically cancel any voting directions
you have previously given by telephone or over the Internet with
respect to your shares.
Revoking
Your Proxy
If you are the owner of record of your shares, you can revoke
your proxy at any time before its exercise by:
|
|
|
|
|
sending a written notice to Alpha, at One Alpha Place,
P.O. Box 2345, Abingdon, Virginia 24212, attention:
Corporate Secretary, bearing a date later than the date of the
proxy, that is received prior to the Alpha special meeting and
states that you revoke your proxy;
|
|
|
|
submitting your proxy again by telephone or over the Internet;
|
|
|
|
signing another proxy card(s) bearing a later date and mailing
it so that it is received prior to the special meeting; or
|
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting in person, although
attendance at the special meeting will not, by itself, revoke a
proxy.
|
If your shares are held in street name by your
broker, you will need to follow the instructions you receive
from your broker to revoke or change your proxy.
42
Other
Voting Matters
Voting
in Person
If you plan to attend the Alpha special meeting and wish to vote
in person, we will give you a ballot at the special meeting.
However, if your shares are held in street name, you
must first obtain from your broker, bank or other nominee a
legal proxy authorizing you to vote the shares in person, which
you must bring with you to the special meeting.
Electronic
Access to Proxy Materials
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is available on our
Internet site at
http://www.alphanr.com.
People
with Disabilities
We can provide reasonable assistance to help you participate in
the special meeting if you tell us about your disability and how
you plan to attend. Please write to Alpha, at One Alpha Place,
P.O. Box 2345, Abingdon, Virginia 24212, attention:
Corporate Secretary, or call at
(276) 619-4410.
Proxy
Solicitations
Alpha is soliciting proxies for the Alpha special meeting from
Alpha stockholders. Alpha will bear the entire cost of
soliciting proxies from Alpha stockholders, except that Cliffs
and Alpha will share equally the expenses incurred in connection
with the filing with the SEC of the registration statement of
which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part and the
printing and mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
In addition to this mailing, Alphas directors, officers
and employees (who will not receive any additional compensation
for their services) may solicit proxies personally,
electronically or by telephone. Alpha has also engaged D.F.
King & Co., Inc., to assist in the solicitation of
proxies for a fee estimated not to exceed $50,000, plus
reimbursement of expenses. Alpha and its proxy solicitors will
also request that banks, brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries send proxy materials to the beneficial
owners of Alpha common stock and will, if requested, reimburse
the record holders for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
in doing so.
Stockholders should not submit any stock certificates with
their proxy cards. A transmittal form with
instructions for the surrender of certificates representing
shares of common stock or book-entry shares of common stock, as
applicable, will be mailed to shares holders if the merger is
completed.
Other
Business
Alpha is not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the
special meeting. If, however, other matters are properly brought
before the Alpha special meeting, your proxies will have
discretion to vote or act on those matters according to their
best judgment and they intend to vote the shares as the Alpha
board of directors may recommend.
Assistance
If you need assistance in completing your proxy card or have
questions regarding Alphas special meeting, please contact
D.F. King & Co., Inc., 48 Wall Street,
22nd Floor,
New York, New York 10005, banks and brokers call collect:
(212) 269-5550,
all others call toll-free:
(888) 887-0082.
43
THE
CLIFFS SPECIAL MEETING
General
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to
Cliffs shareholders as part of a solicitation of proxies by the
Cliffs board of directors for use at the special meeting of
Cliffs shareholders and at any adjournments or postponements
thereof. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is first being
furnished to shareholders of Cliffs on or about October 23,
2008. This joint proxy statement/prospectus provides Cliffs
shareholders with information they need to know to be able to
vote or instruct their vote to be cast at the special meeting of
Cliffs shareholders.
Date,
Time and Place of the Cliffs Special Meeting
The special meeting of Cliffs shareholders will be held at The
Forum Conference Center located at One Cleveland Center, 1375
East Ninth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, on November 21,
2008, at 11 a.m. E.T.
Purposes
of the Cliffs Special Meeting
At the Cliffs special meeting, Cliffs shareholders will be asked:
|
|
|
|
|
to adopt the merger agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs
common shares pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment or postponement of the Cliffs special
meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies
if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Cliffs
special meeting to adopt the merger agreement and approve the
proposal to issue Cliffs common shares pursuant to the terms of
the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
to consider and take action upon any other business that may
properly come before the Cliffs special meeting or any
reconvened meeting following an adjournment or postponement of
the Cliffs special meeting.
|
Record
Date; Outstanding Shares; Shares Entitled to Vote
The record date for the meeting for Cliffs shareholders is
October 6, 2008. This means that you must have been a
holder of record of Cliffs common shares or
Series A-2
preferred stock at the close of business on October 6,
2008, in order to vote at the special meeting. You are entitled
to one vote for each common share and each share of
Series A-2
preferred stock you own. On Cliffs record date,
Cliffs voting securities carried 113,502,668 votes, which
consisted of 13,502,463 common shares (excluding
21,121,065 shares of treasury stock) and 205 shares of
Series A-2
preferred stock.
A complete list of Cliffs shareholders entitled to vote at the
Cliffs special meeting will be available for inspection at the
principal place of business of Cliffs during regular business
hours for a period of no less than ten days before the special
meeting and at the place of the Cliffs special meeting during
the meeting.
Quorum
and Vote Required
A quorum of shareholders is necessary to hold a valid special
meeting of Cliffs. The holders of a majority of the stock issued
and outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting,
present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a
quorum at the special meeting of the shareholders for the
transaction of business at the meeting (with Cliffs common
shares and
Series A-2
preferred stock considered together as a single class).
Abstentions will be counted in determining whether a quorum is
present at the special meeting. As for broker non-votes, Cliffs
expects that there will be practical impediments that will
prevent Cliffs from counting the broker non-votes for purposes
of a quorum at the Cliffs special meeting because Cliffs does
not anticipate that there will be any routine
matters on the agenda for such meeting.
The adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the
issuance of Cliffs common shares pursuant to the terms of the
merger agreement requires the approval of at least two-thirds of
the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of outstanding
common shares and
Series A-2
preferred stock of Cliffs, voting together as a class.
Accordingly, the failure to submit a proxy card or to vote in
person at the Cliffs special meeting or the abstention
44
from voting by Cliffs shareholders, or the failure of any Cliffs
shareholder who holds shares in street name through
a bank or broker to give voting instructions to such bank or
broker, will have the same effect as a vote
against
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve
the issuance of Cliffs common shares in connection with the
merger.
The former owners of PinnOak, which, held, collectively, as of
the record date, 4,000,000 common shares of Cliffs, or
approximately 3.5% of all of the common shares of Cliffs issued
and outstanding as of the record date, and United Mining, which
held as of the record date 4,311,471 common shares of
Cliffs, or approximately 3.8% of the then issued and outstanding
common shares of Cliffs, each entered into separate voting
agreements with Cliffs, pursuant to which they have agreed,
among other things, to vote their respective common shares of
Cliffs in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and the
approval of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the
merger.
To approve any adjournments or postponement of the Cliffs
special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of
proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
Cliffs special meeting to adopt the merger agreement and approve
the issuance of Cliffs common shares, the affirmative vote of a
majority of the voting shares represented at the special meeting
is required, regardless of whether or not a quorum is present.
Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
against
the proposal to adjourn or postpone the special meeting,
while broker non-votes and shares not in attendance at the
special meeting will have no effect on the outcome of any vote
to adjourn or postpone the special meeting.
|
|
ITEM 1
|
THE
ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE ISSUANCE OF CLIFFS
COMMON SHARES PURSUANT TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT
|
As discussed elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
Cliffs shareholders are considering and voting on a proposal to
adopt the merger agreement and approve the issuance of common
shares of Cliffs pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement.
Cliffs shareholders should read carefully this joint proxy
statement/prospectus in its entirety for more detailed
information concerning the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the merger. In particular, Cliffs
shareholders are directed to the merger agreement, which is
attached as Annex A to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
The Cliffs board of directors recommends that Cliffs
shareholders vote
for
the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
issuance of common shares pursuant to the merger and your
properly signed and dated proxy will be so voted unless you
specify otherwise.
|
|
ITEM 2
|
APPROVE
ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING, IF
NECESSARY, TO PERMIT FURTHER SOLICITATION OF PROXIES IF THERE
ARE NOT SUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE CLIFFS SPECIAL
MEETING TO APPROVE THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE MERGER
AGREEMENT AND ISSUE CLIFFS COMMON SHARES IN CONNECTION WITH THE
MERGER
|
Cliffs shareholders may be asked to vote on a proposal to
adjourn or postpone the Cliffs special meeting, if necessary, to
permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not
sufficient votes at the time of the Cliffs special meeting to
approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and issue
common shares of Cliffs pursuant to the terms of the merger
agreement.
The Cliffs board of directors recommends that Cliffs
shareholders vote
for
the proposal to adjourn or postpone the Cliffs special meeting
under certain circumstances, and your properly signed and dated
proxy will be so voted unless you specify otherwise.
Share
Ownership and Voting by Cliffs Directors and Executive
Officers
As of the record date for the Cliffs special meeting,
Cliffs directors and executive officers had the right to
vote approximately 1,574,181 shares of the then outstanding
Cliffs voting stock at the Cliffs special meeting. As of the
record date of the Cliffs special meeting, these shares
represented approximately 1.39% of the Cliffs common shares
outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting. We currently
expect that Cliffs directors and executive officers will
vote their shares
for
the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
issuance of Cliffs common shares in connection with the merger,
although none of them has entered into any agreement requiring
them to do so.
45
How to
Vote
You may vote in person at the Cliffs special meeting or by
proxy. Cliffs recommends you submit your proxy even if you plan
to attend the special meeting. If you submit your proxy, you may
change your vote if you attend and vote at the special meeting.
If you own stock in your own name, you are an owner of
record. This means that you may use the enclosed proxy
card(s) to tell the persons named as proxies how to vote your
shares. If you properly complete, sign and date your proxy
card(s) or submit your proxy by telephone or over the Internet,
your proxy will be voted in accordance with your instructions.
The named proxies will vote all shares at the meeting for which
proxies have been properly submitted (whether by mail, telephone
or over the Internet) and not revoked. If you sign and return
your proxy card(s) but do not mark your card(s) to tell the
proxies how to vote your shares on each proposal, your proxy
will be voted as recommended by the Cliffs board of directors.
If you hold Cliffs shares in a stock brokerage account or
through a bank, broker or other nominee, or, in other words, in
street name, please follow the voting instructions
provided by that entity. With respect to the proposal relating
to the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
issuance of Cliffs common shares pursuant to the merger
agreement, if you do not instruct your bank, broker or other
nominee how to vote your shares, your bank, broker or other
nominee will not be authorized to vote with respect to the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the issuance
of Cliffs common shares in the merger, and a broker non-vote
will occur. This will have the same effect as the vote
against
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the
issuance of Cliffs common shares in the merger. In addition, if
you do not instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to
vote your shares with respect to the proposal to adjourn or
postpone the meeting to solicit further proxies to approve the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the issuance
of Cliffs common shares pursuant to the merger agreement, a
broker non-vote will occur.
If you abstain from voting with respect to the proposal to the
issuance of Cliffs common shares pursuant to the merger
agreement, your abstention will have the same effect as a vote
against
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the
issuance of Cliffs common shares in the merger. With respect to
the proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting to solicit
further proxies to approve the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs common shares in
the merger, your abstention will have the same effect as a vote
againstthe
proposal to adjourn or postpone the special meeting, whether the
quorum is present or not.
If you are an owner of record, you have three voting
options:
|
|
|
|
|
Internet: You can vote over the
Internet at the Web address shown on your proxy card(s). You
will be prompted to enter your Control Number from your proxy
card. This number will identify you as a shareholder of record.
Follow the simple instructions that will be given to you to
record your vote. If you vote over the Internet, do not return
your proxy card(s).
|
|
|
|
Telephone: You can vote by telephone by
calling the toll-free number on your proxy card(s). You will be
prompted to enter your Control Number from your proxy card. This
number will identify you as a shareholder of record. Follow the
simple instructions that will be given to you to record your
vote. If you vote by telephone, do not return your proxy card(s).
|
|
|
|
Mail: You can vote by mail by simply
signing, dating and mailing your proxy card(s) in the
postage-paid envelope included with this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
A number of banks and brokerage firms participate in a program
that also permits shareholders whose shares are held in
street name to direct their vote by telephone or
over the Internet. If your shares are held in an account at a
bank or brokerage firm that participates in such a program, you
may direct the vote of these shares by telephone or over the
Internet by following the voting instructions enclosed with the
proxy form from the bank or brokerage firm. The Internet and
telephone proxy procedures are designed to authenticate
shareholders identities, to allow shareholders to give
their proxy voting instructions and to confirm that those
instructions have been properly recorded. Directing the voting
of your shares will not affect your right to vote in person if
you decide to attend the Cliffs special meeting; however, you
must first obtain a signed and properly executed legal proxy
from your bank, broker or other nominee to vote your shares held
in street name at your special meeting. Requesting a
legal proxy
46
will automatically cancel any voting directions you have
previously given by telephone or over the Internet with respect
to your shares.
Special Instructions for Northshore Mining Company and Silver
Bay Power Company Retirement Savings Plan
Participants. Each participant in the Northshore
Mining Company and Silver Bay Power Company Retirement Savings
Plan, or the Northshore and Silver Bay Plan, has the right to
instruct the trustee of the Northshore and Silver Bay Plan as to
how to have the shares held in such participants plan
account voted at the Cliffs special meeting. The Northshore and
Silver Bay Plan participants cannot vote their Northshore and
Silver Bay Plan shares directly; they can only direct the
trustee how to vote those shares. The Northshore and Silver Bay
Plan participants must return their instructions to the trustee
on the enclosed proxy card by no later than the time and date
specified in the enclosed proxy card. If the Northshore and
Silver Bay Plan participants do not return timely instructions
to the Northshore and Silver Bay Plan trustee as to how to vote
their shares or if the proxy card is unsigned, the shares of
such Northshore and Silver Bay Plan participants will not be
voted. Therefore, it is very important that participants in the
Northshore and Silver Bay Plan provide the trustee with prompt
and proper instructions. The Cliffs board of directors urges the
Northshore and Silver Bay Plan participants to instruct the
trustee to vote their shares FOR the proposals set forth
in the proxy card.
Revoking
Your Proxy
If you are the owner of record of your shares, you can revoke
your proxy at any time before its exercise by:
|
|
|
|
|
sending a written notice to Cliffs, at 1100 Superior Avenue
East, Suite 1500, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, attention:
Corporate Secretary, bearing a date later than the date of the
proxy that is received prior to the Cliffs special meeting and
states that you revoke your proxy;
|
|
|
|
submitting your proxy again by telephone or over the Internet;
|
|
|
|
signing another proxy card(s) bearing a later date and mailing
it so that it is received prior to the special meeting; or
|
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting in person, although
attendance at the special meeting will not, by itself, revoke a
proxy.
|
If your shares are held in street name by your
broker, you will need to follow the instructions you receive
from your broker to revoke or change your proxy.
Other
Voting Matters
Voting
in Person
If you plan to attend the Cliffs special meeting and wish to
vote in person, we will give you a ballot at the special
meeting. However, if your shares are held in street
name, you must first obtain a legal proxy from your
broker, bank or other nominee authorizing you to vote the shares
in person, which you must bring with you to the special meeting.
Electronic
Access to Proxy Material
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is available on our
Internet site at
http://www.cliffsnaturalresources.com.
People
with Disabilities
We can provide you with reasonable assistance to help you
participate in the special meeting if you tell us about your
disability and how you plan to attend. Please write to Cliffs,
at 1100 Superior Avenue East, Suite 1500, Cleveland, Ohio
44114, attention: Corporate Secretary, or call at
(216) 694-5700,
at least two weeks before the special meeting.
47
Proxy
Solicitations
Cliffs is soliciting proxies for the Cliffs special meeting from
Cliffs shareholders. Cliffs will bear the entire cost of
soliciting proxies from Cliffs shareholders, except that Cliffs
and Alpha will share equally the expenses incurred in connection
with the filing with the SEC of the registration statement of
which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part and the
printing and mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
In addition to this mailing, Cliffs directors, officers
and employees (who will not receive any additional compensation
for their services) may solicit proxies personally,
electronically or by telephone. Cliffs has also engaged
Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist in the solicitation of
proxies for a fee not to exceed $400,000 plus reimbursement of
expenses, including phone calls. Cliffs and its proxy solicitors
will also request that banks, brokerage houses and other
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries send proxy materials to the
beneficial owners of Cliffs common shares and will, if
requested, reimburse the record holders for their reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses in doing so.
Other
Business
Cliffs is not aware of any other business to be acted upon at
the special meeting. If, however, other matters are properly
brought before the special meeting, your proxies will have
discretion to vote or act on those matters according to their
best judgment and they intend to vote the shares as the Cliffs
board of directors may recommend.
Assistance
If you need assistance in completing your proxy card or have
questions regarding Cliffs special meeting, please contact
Innisfree M&A Incorporated, 501 Madison Avenue,
20th Floor, New York, NY 10022, shareholders may call
toll-free: (877) 456-3507,
banks and brokers call collect:
(212) 750-5833.
THE
MERGER
General
Pursuant to the merger agreement, merger sub (which has been
renamed Alpha Merger Sub, Inc. effective August 11, 2008)
will merge with and into Alpha (or, under certain circumstances
as described in Annex G, merger sub will be
converted from a Delaware corporation into a Delaware limited
liability company, Alpha Merger Sub, LLC, and Alpha will merge
with and into Alpha Merger Sub, LLC). As a result of the merger,
Alpha will become wholly owned by Cliffs.
Background
of the Merger
As part of the continuous evaluation of its business,
Cliffs board of directors and management have regularly
evaluated Cliffs business strategy and prospects for
growth and considered opportunities to improve Cliffs
operations and financial performance in order to create value
for Cliffs shareholders. As part of this process Cliffs
management has evaluated various opportunities to expand and
diversify its business through acquisitions, and has discussed
such opportunities with Cliffs board of directors. As part
of these evaluations, the Cliffs board of directors and
management on various occasions have received advice from
outside financial and legal advisors.
During the early 2000s, the Cliffs board of directors
reviewed various options for the business and determined that a
strategy of growth and diversification was the best way to
generate value for Cliffs shareholders. As a result of such
evaluations, Cliffs has recently effected a number of strategic
transactions, including the acquisition of a controlling
interest in Australian iron ore producer Portman in 2005.
Joseph A. Carrabba, Cliffs Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, was hired by Cliffs in 2005 and became Chief
Executive Officer in 2006 because of his extensive background in
global diversified mining, having over two decades of experience
in the industry, most recently as President and Chief
Operating Officer for Diavik Diamond Mines, Inc., a subsidiary
of Rio Tinto plc. Prior to his position at Diavik Diamond Mines,
Inc., Mr. Carrabba served as General Manager of Weipa
Bauxite Operation of Comalco Aluminum and in a variety of other
positions throughout his career at Rio Tinto plc. In 2005,
Mr. Carrabba led a strategic review of various minerals
with the Cliffs board of directors to determine the best
approach to growth and diversification.
48
In early 2007, Cliffs began articulating its strategy of
diversification to a broad group of investors. This
communication included an evaluation of various minerals
throughout the periodic table and a discussion on various
geographies.
During the first half of 2007, Cliffs acquired 30% of
Amapá, a Brazilian iron ore producer, and 45% of Sonoma, an
Australian coal operation. Sonoma was Cliffs first
acquisition of coal assets.
On June 14, 2007, Cliffs announced the acquisition of
metallurgical coal producer PinnOak. In addition to the PinnOak
transaction, Cliffs has evaluated other coal mining
opportunities from time to time, including an acquisition of
Alpha.
Alpha, in consultation with outside legal and financial
advisors, regularly reviews strategic alternatives to
Alphas stand-alone plan, including business combinations
with, acquisitions of and sales to, other companies active in
the metals and mining sector. In connection with and as a result
of these ongoing reviews, in 2006 and 2007 Alpha engaged in
preliminary or exploratory confidential discussions with several
potential acquisition targets, merger partners and acquirers.
In 2006 and 2007, Alpha, in consultation with its outside
counsel, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, or
Cleary Gottlieb, and its financial advisor, considered and
engaged in exploratory discussions and due diligence with
another company operating in the coal mining sector, which is
referred to as Company 1, regarding a possible at-market merger
of equals between Alpha and Company 1. These discussions did not
result in a transaction due to disagreements relating to the
relative valuation of the two companies and the appropriate
allocation of management responsibilities for the combined
company. As an alternative to this proposed merger of equals
transaction, Company 1 made a preliminary proposal to acquire
Alpha. At a special meeting of the board of directors of Alpha
held on May 31, 2007, the Alpha board determined that this
preliminary proposal was inadequate. Discussions between Alpha
and Company 1 terminated shortly thereafter.
Also in 2007, Alpha, in consultation with Cleary Gottlieb and
its financial advisor, considered and engaged in exploratory
discussions and due diligence with a different company operating
in the coal mining sector, which is referred to as Company 2,
regarding a possible acquisition of Alpha by Company 2 for
all-stock consideration. These discussions terminated in the
summer of 2007, when Company 2 informed Alpha that it did not
intend to proceed with the potential transaction because, in
view of the trading prices of the stock of the respective
companies, the transaction would be economically dilutive to
Company 2.
In late spring 2007, Michael J. Quillen, Alphas Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Carrabba had a
preliminary conversation regarding the general possibility of a
strategic collaboration between Cliffs and Alpha.
During the spring and summer of 2007, Cliffs and Alpha discussed
the possibility of a stock-for-stock transaction in which Cliffs
would have acquired all of the common stock of Alpha at an
implied premium to Alphas trading price. As part of those
discussions, the parties entered into a confidentiality
agreement on June 21, 2007, which contained reciprocal
standstill obligations of the parties for a period of
18 months, subject to specified exceptions.
During July and August 2007, Alpha and Cliffs and their
respective financial and legal advisors conducted reciprocal due
diligence investigations and engaged in further discussions
regarding the terms of this potential all-stock transaction. The
discussions did not progress beyond preliminary analyses of the
economics of an exchange ratio and the structure of the
transaction and the post-transaction governance arrangements.
On August 9, 2007, Cliffs management and the members of the
board of directors held a board meeting. Representatives of
Cliffs outside counsel, Jones Day, and other outside
advisors participated in the meetings. At the meeting,
management and the board conducted a strategic review of the
global coal industry and potential opportunities in the coal
space. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Cliffs board of
directors authorized management to continue pursuing a possible
merger transaction with Alpha.
On September 11, 2007, Cliffs management and board of
directors, at a regularly scheduled meeting, further discussed a
potential transaction with Alpha. The Cliffs board of directors
determined that it was not the right time to pursue a potential
transaction with Alpha.
49
On September 18, 2007, Mr. Carrabba notified
Mr. Quillen that the Cliffs board was not prepared to
proceed with the proposed business combination at that time.
In the course of the Alpha boards oversight of
Alphas discussions with Cliffs, the board considered the
interests that one director of Alpha, John Brinzo, had in Cliffs
as a result of his former role as Chair of Cliffs, including his
receipt of a pension from Cliffs and ownership of common shares
and unvested performance shares of Cliffs. Mr. Brinzo
confirmed that he no longer owed any duties to Cliffs, including
duties of disclosure or confidentiality, and that he would share
with the Alpha board all material information in his possession
relating to Cliffs. The Alpha board considered and discussed
Mr. Brinzos former relationship with and interests
relating to Cliffs from time to time at meetings in 2007 and
2008 whenever discussions turned to Alphas relationship
with Cliffs, including in executive session without
Mr. Brinzo present. After considering the factual
background, the board took the view consistently during 2007 and
2008 that Mr. Brinzos prior relationship with Cliffs
and his existing interests in Cliffs did not preclude him from
being a valuable contributor to the Alpha boards
deliberations about strategic alternatives and matters relating
to Cliffs and, in any event, that Mr. Brinzo was not in any
way improperly influencing the deliberative processes of the
board.
Beginning in November 2007, Mr. Carrabba engaged in
informal discussions on several occasions with the Chief
Financial Officer of another North American coal producer, which
is referred to as Company A, regarding a potential combination
of the two companies. The parties did not enter into a
confidentiality agreement or engage in due diligence. The
potential opportunity to acquire Company A was first reviewed
with the Cliffs board in January 2008. Mr. Carrabba and the
Chairman of Company A met on February 25, 2008. At that
meeting, Mr. Carrabba outlined in general terms the
possibility of a stock and cash offer for Company A. Company
As Chairman indicated that while he was open to
discussions, a stock deal would not be attractive and he was not
convinced of the strategic rationale of the proposed
combination. With worsening credit markets in March and April
and a sharp increase in Company As stock price, Cliffs
determined that an offer to acquire Company A at that time was
not feasible. The discussions with Company A did not progress
beyond the February 25 meeting.
In 2007, in addition to the respective discussions described
above with Cliffs, Company 1 and Company 2, Alpha, in
consultation with its advisors, engaged in exploratory and
preliminary discussions with strategic and financial buyers who
contacted Alpha to express an interest in considering an
acquisition of Alpha. These strategic and financial buyers
withdrew from or ceased discussions before the discussions ever
advanced beyond the exploratory and preliminary stage.
Beginning in mid-April 2008, Cliffs management and
J.P. Morgan, financial advisor to Cliffs, met on several
occasions to discuss potential acquisition opportunities, with
an emphasis on opportunities to acquire metallurgical coal
assets.
Exploratory discussions of a possible transaction involving
Alpha and Cliffs resumed in April 2008. In late April 2008,
Mr. Quillen and Mr. Carrabba agreed to reinitiate
exploratory discussions for a potential combination involving
Alpha, Cliffs and Company A. Executives from Cliffs and Alpha
had further exploratory discussions about this potential
combination on April 28 and April 29, 2008.
In April 2008, Mr. Carrabba contacted a representative of a
company with interests in the metals and mining sector, which is
referred to as Company 4, to request a meeting to generally
discuss current business between the companies. As a result of
this contact, on April 28, 2008, a senior executive of
Company 4 met with Mr. Carrabba. During this meeting, the
representatives of Company 4 indicated that Company 4 would be
interested in a potential acquisition of Cliffs for cash, but
did not mention any price.
During May 2008, exploratory discussions between Alpha and
Company 2 regarding a potential transaction resumed. These
discussions focused on a possible acquisition of Company 2 by
Alpha for all-stock consideration.
During May 2008, Alpha also signed a confidentiality agreement
with another company in the coal sector, which is referred to as
Company 3, and commenced preliminary discussions and due
diligence with senior representatives of Company 3 with a view
toward an acquisition of Company 3 by Alpha.
In addition to these discussions with Cliffs, Company 2 and
Company 3, during the first half of 2008, Alpha engaged in
exploratory discussions and due diligence with other parties
about other potential significant acquisition
50
transactions by Alpha. None of these acquisition transactions
advanced beyond these preliminary stages due to either a
reluctance of the counterparty to sell or different perspectives
on valuation.
On May 6, 2008, Mr. Carrabba and Laurie Brlas,
Cliffs Chief Financial Officer, met with Mr. Quillen,
Kevin Crutchfield, Alphas President, and David Stuebe,
Alphas Chief Financial Officer, to discuss the possible
combination involving Cliffs, Alpha and Company A.
Representatives of J.P. Morgan and Citi were also in
attendance. During this meeting, representatives of Cliffs
proposed a potential three-way, all-stock combination in which
Alpha and Company A would each have received a 10% premium and
two seats on the combined companys board of directors. All
in attendance at the meeting agreed that the potential three-way
combination merited further consideration. Each of Cliffs and
Alpha agreed to discuss the potential combination with their
respective boards of directors in upcoming board meetings.
On May 13, 2008, the Cliffs board of directors held a
regularly scheduled board meeting. Representatives from
J.P. Morgan, Cliffs financial advisor, and Jones Day,
legal counsel to Cliffs, participated in the meeting.
Cliffs management and representatives of J.P. Morgan
discussed with the Cliffs board of directors a number of trends
in the iron ore and coal industries. During the course of the
meeting, Cliffs management indicated its view that the
acquisition of PinnOak, while recently completed, had been very
successful. Cliffs management also reiterated its belief
that an acquisition of, or a combination with, a significant
producer of metallurgical coal was a critical component to the
successful implementation of Cliffs long-term growth
strategy to create value for Cliffs shareholders. Toward that
end, Cliffs management and representatives of
J.P. Morgan outlined a number of potential opportunities to
acquire metallurgical coal assets, including the possible
combination involving Cliffs, Alpha and Company A. Cliffs
management reported on the preliminary discussions of the
May 6th meeting
with Alpha regarding the potential three-way combination.
Cliffs board of directors carefully considered the
benefits and risks of a potential transaction among Cliffs,
Alpha and Company A and, following a thorough discussion,
Cliffs board of directors authorized management to engage
in formal discussions with Alpha and Company A regarding a
combination of the three companies. Also, at the meeting, the
directors, as well as members of Cliffs senior management
and representatives of Cliffs legal and financial advisors
also reviewed the discussions between Mr. Carrabba and the
senior representative of Company 4, as well as Cliffs
stand-alone plan. Cliffs board of directors asked a number
of questions of its legal and financial advisors. After a
careful deliberation and consideration, the Cliffs board of
directors determined that it was not in the best interests of
Cliffs and its shareholders to pursue a transaction with Company
4 at that time. The board of directors instructed Cliffs
management to inform Company 4 of its decision.
On May 14, 2008, the Alpha board of directors held a
regularly scheduled meeting, in which members of Alpha senior
management also participated. During the meeting, the board
reviewed the recent discussions with Cliffs, Company 2 and
Company 3, as well as other alternatives available to Alpha. The
Alpha board of directors engaged in a discussion regarding the
benefits and risks of potential transactions involving Cliffs,
Company A, Company 2, Company 3 and other alternatives available
to Alpha and, thereafter, instructed Alphas management to
continue discussions with respect to these potential
transactions.
On May 15, 2008, Mr. Carrabba informed a senior
representative of Company 4 that Cliffs was not interested in
pursuing a transaction with Company 4 at such time. Following
this conversation, Company 4 did not subsequently contact Cliffs
regarding a potential transaction.
On May 16, 2008, Mr. Quillen spoke with Company
As Chairman, who agreed to meet with representatives from
Alpha and Cliffs later that spring.
On May 28, 2008, a representative of Company 4 contacted an
executive of Alpha to request a meeting. As a result of this
contact, on June 4, 2008, representatives of Alpha met with
representatives of Company 4. During this meeting, the
representatives of Company 4 indicated that Company 4 would be
interested in a potential acquisition of Alpha for cash.
On May 30, 2008, after consulting with members of the Alpha
board of directors, Mr. Quillen sent to Company 2s
Chief Executive Officer a preliminary, non-binding proposal
letter outlining the main terms of a possible acquisition of
Company 2 by Alpha for all-stock consideration representing a
25% premium over Company 2s trading price on a date to be
agreed. On June 3, 2008, representatives of Alpha and
Company 2 and their respective
51
financial and legal advisors met for a preliminary discussion on
the main terms of the proposed transaction. Following this
meeting, Alpha and Company 2, together with their advisors,
began negotiations regarding the terms of a potential
transaction, including the terms of a merger agreement.
During the first week of June 2008, senior representatives of
Company 3 and Alpha held further preliminary discussions about a
business combination of the two companies. Talks with Company 3
about such a business combination never progressed beyond the
preliminary stage.
On June 2, 2008, Mr. Carrabba and Mr. Quillen had a
meeting with the Chairman of Company A to discuss a potential
combination of the three companies. The Chairman of Company A
indicated that he would discuss the potential combination with
his board of directors at an upcoming meeting. Shortly
thereafter, Mr. Carrabba contacted the Chairman of Company
A to
follow-up on
the June 2, 2008 meeting and to determine whether Company A
would be willing to enter into a customary confidentiality
agreement with Cliffs and Alpha so that the parties could
commence reciprocal due diligence. Company As Chairman
indicated that while he believed the potential combination might
be worth exploring, Company As board of directors was not
willing to pursue a potential transaction at that time.
Following Mr. Carrabbas discussion with Company A,
Mr. Carrabba and Mr. Quillen had further discussions.
Despite the fact that Company A was unwilling to pursue further
discussions regarding a potential three-way combination,
Mr. Carrabba and Mr. Quillen continued to believe that
a combination of Cliffs and Alpha was a compelling transaction
that the parties should continue to explore. They agreed to
continue to engage in discussions and due diligence with respect
to a potential combination between the two companies. During
these further discussions, Mr. Carrabba reiterated
Cliffs interest in pursuing a combination with Alpha for
all-stock consideration at a 10% premium.
On June 9, 2008, Alpha engaged Citi to act as its financial
advisor in connection with the proposed transaction with Cliffs,
which engagement was formalized pursuant to an engagement letter
executed on July 15, 2008.
Also on June 9, 2008, Alpha held a special meeting of the
board of directors at which the directors reviewed and
discussed, in consultation with management, Citi and Cleary
Gottlieb, the alternatives available to Alpha. Alphas
senior management and representatives of Citi reviewed with the
Alpha board the recent discussions with Cliffs, Company 2,
Company 3 and Company 4, as well as other potential
counterparties. After a discussion regarding the risks and
benefits of these potential transactions, the Alpha board of
directors instructed management to continue its ongoing
discussions with Cliffs and the other interested parties.
On June 10, 2008, Mr. Quillen and Mr. Crutchfield
met with representatives of Company 4. During the meeting,
Company 4s representatives made a verbal, non-binding
proposal to acquire Alpha at a price of $97 to $100 per share in
cash and requested a response from Alpha to this proposal within
48 hours.
On June 11, 2008, Mr. Crutchfield called a
representative of Company 4 to inform him that Alphas
board of directors, with the assistance of Alphas
advisors, would carefully consider Company 4s proposal in
the context of Alphas stand-alone strategy and other
opportunities that Alpha had been considering and would not be
in a position to provide a response before completing such a
thorough review and assessment. Mr. Crutchfield also
indicated that Alpha was willing to share confidential
information with Company 4 upon its entering into a
confidentiality and standstill agreement. On June 12, 2008,
Mr. Quillen spoke to a representative of Company 4 to
convey a similar message.
Also on June 11, 2008, Alpha held a special meeting of the
board of directors at which the directors, in consultation with
Alphas senior management and representatives of Citi and
Cleary Gottlieb, discussed and analyzed the oral, non-binding
proposal received from Company 4, the recent discussions with
Cliffs and Company 2, and the latest developments on the other
strategic opportunities under consideration. The Alpha board of
directors instructed management to continue its ongoing
discussions with Cliffs and the other interested parties and
determined to discuss these developments again at another board
meeting to be scheduled later that month.
On June 13, 2008, Company 4 sent a letter to Alpha
reiterating Company 4s non-binding proposal to acquire all
the outstanding shares of Alpha common stock at a cash price of
$97 to $100 per share and requesting a response
52
by June 20, 2008. During this period, the trading price of
Alpha common stock at times exceeded the price being offered by
Company 4 (e.g., the opening trading price per share on
June 19, 2008 was $102.40).
On June 16, 2008, representatives of Cliffs, Jones Day and
J.P. Morgan met to discuss a potential business combination
transaction with Alpha. On June 18, 2008, Mr. Carrabba
asked Mr. Quillen to inform him, after Alphas next
board meeting, whether Alpha remained interested in a business
combination transaction with Cliffs on the terms previously
discussed.
On June 19, 2008, Alpha held a special meeting of the board
of directors at which the directors, as well as members of
Alphas senior management and representatives of Citi and
Cleary Gottlieb, reviewed in detail Alphas alternatives
and stand-alone plan. Alpha management updated the directors on
the latest developments regarding potential transactions under
consideration by Alpha, including the status of discussions with
Cliffs, Company 2, Company 3, and Company 4. Representatives
from Citi reviewed with the board information about and analyses
of the various strategic alternatives available to Alpha.
Representatives from Cleary Gottlieb then discussed with the
board the legal standards applicable to its decisions and
actions with respect to the various potential transactions. The
Alpha board instructed management to continue to pursue
discussions with each of Cliffs, Company 2, and Company 4 in
order to more fully develop, refine and, if possible, improve
each of these alternatives and, in the case of Company 4 and
Cliffs (but not Company 2), to convey that their most recent
proposals were inadequate.
On June 20, 2008, Mr. Quillen communicated to Company
4 that its proposal at $97 to $100 in cash was inadequate and to
Cliffs that the 10% all-stock premium that Cliffs had discussed
in the context of the earlier discussions was inadequate.
Mr. Quillen then updated the Alpha board on these
discussions. In parallel, Alpha management proceeded with
negotiations and discussions with Company 2.
On June 24, 2008, Cliffs and Alpha entered into a
clean team confidentiality agreement governing the
exchange of sensitive confidential information to selected
representatives of each other in the context of the reciprocal
due diligence for a possible business combination transaction.
On June 26, 2008, Mr. Carrabba, Ms. Brlas and
Mr. Steve Baisden, Cliffs director of investor
relations, met with a senior representative of Harbinger Capital
Partners as part of a customary road show with one of
Cliffs sell-side analysts. Cliffs did not provide
Harbinger Capital Partners with any non-public information. The
parties discussed general industry dynamics and Cliffs strategy
to diversify and further expand into coal. Cliffs noted that
Appalachian coal was ripe for consolidation. The senior
representative of Harbinger Capital Partners expressed strong
support for Cliffs acquisition of PinnOak. Based on
filings with the SEC, Harbinger Capital Partners increased its
ownership stake in Cliffs shortly after the June 26, 2008
meeting.
On June 27, 2008, Alpha and Company 4 entered into a
confidentiality agreement that contained reciprocal standstill
obligations of the parties.
On June 30, 2008, representatives of Cliffs and
J.P. Morgan, on one hand, and Alpha and Citi, on the other
hand, met to conduct reciprocal financial and operational due
diligence and to discuss the terms, conditions and structure of
a potential combination of Cliffs and Alpha.
Also on June 30, 2008, Alpha held a special meeting of the
board of directors at which the directors discussed and
analyzed, in consultation with management, Citi and Cleary
Gottlieb, the most recent discussions with Cliffs, Company 2,
and Company 4 and further prepared themselves to be in a
position to act quickly and in an informed manner if revised
proposals were made by Cliffs, Company 2, or Company 4.
From June 20 through July 8, 2008, Alphas senior
management and advisors continued to engage in negotiations with
Company 2 and its advisors regarding the terms of the proposed
merger transaction, including exchanging several drafts of a
merger agreement. In the course of these negotiations, Alpha and
Company 2 agreed to increase the premium payable to Company
2 shareholders from 25% to 27%. By July 8, 2008, the
primary open issue in the negotiations between Alpha and Company
2 was how to allocate the risk that the financing needed for the
proposed transaction would not be obtained. Although the
proposed transaction with Company 2 called for all-stock
consideration, the combination would trigger acceleration of
debt, mostly at Company 2, that would have had to be refinanced.
On July 8, Company 2s Chief Executive Officer
communicated to Alpha that Company 2 would suspend all activity
on the contemplated transaction until Alpha agreed that the
merger agreement would contain
53
neither any financing condition nor any limitation on
Alphas liability in the event closing failed to occur due
to the failure of the financing to be disbursed. Alphas
board of directors did not believe this to be a reasonable
request. Alpha and Company 2 and their advisors then ceased
discussions on the merger agreement. However, Alpha continued
discussions with its debt financing sources regarding the terms
of the financing for the proposed transaction and continued to
update Company 2 regarding these discussions. Alphas
senior management and advisors then took steps to facilitate the
making of revised acquisition proposals by each of Cliffs and
Company 4. These activities included the sharing of due
diligence materials with Cliffs and Company 4 and impressing
upon them the need to come forward with their best and final
proposals.
On July 2 and 3, 2008, representatives of Cliffs and Alpha and
their respective financial advisors engaged in numerous
discussions concerning due diligence and potential transaction
structures.
On July 8 and 9, 2008, representatives of Company 4 and its
advisors attended site visits and management presentations at
Alphas facilities.
Also on July 8 and 9, 2008, the Cliffs board of directors
convened a regularly scheduled meeting. Representatives from
J.P. Morgan and Jones Day participated in the meeting on
the morning of July 8, 2008. At this meeting, the Cliffs
management reviewed with the Cliffs board of directors the
status of the discussions to date with Alpha and Citi regarding
a potential business combination transaction. Also at this
meeting, J.P. Morgan presented a preliminary analysis of a
combination of Cliffs and Alpha. In addition, Jones Day
discussed the board of directors fiduciary duties in the
context of an acquisition transaction. At the conclusion of the
July 8, 2008 board meeting, Cliffs board of directors
authorized management to make a formal non-binding offer of
$13.78 per share in cash and one common share of Cliffs for each
share of Alpha common stock.
On July 8, 2008, Cliffs executed an engagement letter with
J.P. Morgan.
During the late morning on July 8, 2008, representatives of
Cliffs management, Jones Day and J.P. Morgan met to
discuss the non-binding offer to acquire Alpha, the outstanding
due diligence requests and the terms of the financing to be
arranged by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., which is referred to as
JPMCB.
Also, during the early afternoon of July 8, 2008, a senior
representative of Harbinger Capital Partners called
Mr. Carrabba and Ms. Brlas to consult generally about
factors to consider when contemplating an acquisition of
Appalachian coal assets or coal assets in Alabama. The parties
discussed generally those factors that Cliffs typically focuses
on in connection with such acquisitions. The senior
representative of Harbinger Capital Partners thanked them for
the information and concluded the call.
During the afternoon of July 8, 2008, Mr. Carrabba and
Ms. Brlas met with Mr. Quillen and
Mr. Crutchfield in Abingdon, Virginia. At this meeting,
Mr. Carrabba and Ms. Brlas presented to
Mr. Quillen and Mr. Crutchfield the terms of
Cliffs non-binding offer for the acquisition of all
outstanding shares of Alpha common stock for a per share
consideration of one Cliffs common share and $13.78 in cash.
Based on the closing price of Cliffs common shares on
July 7, 2008, the proposal was valued at $112.13 per share,
which represented an implied premium of approximately 28% as of
that date. In the proposal to Alpha, Cliffs proposed to expand
its board of directors to include Mr. Quillen, who would
become non-executive vice chairman of Cliffs, and Glenn A.
Eisenberg, a non-management member of Alphas board. In
addition, Cliffs proposed to appoint Mr. Crutchfield to the
post of president of Cliffs coal division, and to call the
combined company Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. This
proposal indicated, among other things, that the proposed
acquisition would not be subject to any financing condition and
that both parties would be subject to a customary reciprocal
break-up fee.
On July 9, 2008, Cliffs delivered to Alpha an initial draft
of the merger agreement.
Also on July 9, 2008, Alpha held a special meeting of its
board of directors at which the directors, in consultation with
management, Citi and Cleary Gottlieb, analyzed and discussed
Cliffs July 8, 2008 proposal and the alternatives
available to Alpha, including the possibility of a revised
proposal from Company 4. Alphas senior management then
reviewed with the Alpha board the results of Alphas
financial and legal due diligence investigation of Cliffs in
2007 and its additional investigation during the prior weeks.
Representatives of Cleary Gottlieb and Citi informed the board
that, under Ohio law, the transaction would require the approval
of two-thirds of Cliffs outstanding shares and that
Harbinger Capital Partners would therefore play a very important
role in
54
determining whether shareholder approval would be obtained. As
of October 6, 2008, the record date for the Cliffs special
meeting, Harbinger Capital Partners had shared voting and
dispositive power with respect to 16,616,472 Cliffs common
shares, which constituted 14.64% of Cliffs outstanding
common shares as of October 6, 2008 (based upon information
contained in Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13D filed by
Harbinger Capital Partners with the SEC on August 14,
2008). The board of directors instructed Alphas management
and advisors to continue negotiations with Cliffs on the terms
of the proposed transaction as set forth in the draft merger
agreement and to communicate to Cliffs that the board strongly
believed that Cliffs should discuss the proposed transaction
with Harbinger Capital Partners prior to the execution of a
definitive merger agreement. The board of directors also
instructed Alphas management and advisors to continue
working on the terms of the financing for the possible
transaction with Company 2. In addition, the board instructed
Alphas management to communicate to Company 4s
advisors that if Company 4 intended to make a revised proposal
for the acquisition of Alpha, it should do so in the next few
days. Representatives of Alpha subsequently informed Company 4
that any revised proposal should be submitted no later than
July 14, 2008.
On July 9, 2008, Mr. Quillen indicated to the Chief
Executive Officer of Company 2 that Alpha was now in serious
discussions with another party for a strategic transaction and
that he anticipated that the value represented by this other
transaction would be of interest to Alphas board.
Mr. Quillen advised the Chief Executive Officer of Company
2 that Alpha was proceeding with negotiations with its banks on
financing of the transaction with Company 2 and would continue
that work and that Alpha hoped to report back on July 14,
2008 based on feedback from the banks.
On July 11, 2008, the Cliffs board of directors convened a
special meeting. Representatives of J.P. Morgan and Jones
Day participated in the meeting. At this meeting,
Mr. Carrabba and Ms. Brlas provided the Cliffs board
of directors with an update concerning their discussions with
Mr. Quillen and Mr. Crutchfield on July 8, 2008.
Representatives of Jones Day and Cleary Gottlieb had a brief
discussion regarding the merger agreement later on July 11,
2008. The representatives of Cleary Gottlieb indicated that,
given the size of Harbinger Capital Partners equity
interest in Cliffs and the required Cliffs shareholder approval
necessary to complete the proposed transaction, Alphas
board of directors believed very strongly that Cliffs should
discuss the proposed transaction with Harbinger Capital Partners
prior to the execution of a definitive merger agreement. Later
that evening, representatives of Cleary Gottlieb delivered to
Jones Day a
mark-up of
the merger agreement sent by Cliffs on July 9, 2008.
From July 11 through July 13, 2008, Cliffs and Alpha and
their respective advisors negotiated the terms of the merger
agreement.
On July 13, 2008, the Cliffs board of directors convened a
special meeting. Representatives of J.P. Morgan and Jones
Day participated in the meeting. At this meeting, the
Cliffs management team reviewed with the board of
directors of Cliffs, J.P. Morgan and Jones Day, the status
of the negotiations with Alpha and the proposed terms and
conditions of the merger. During this meeting, Cliffs
management also reviewed the results of its financial and legal
due diligence investigation, and J.P. Morgan reviewed its
updated financial analysis of the proposed business combination.
Jones Day reviewed the material terms and conditions of the
merger agreement, as reflected in the then current draft, and
the legal duties and responsibilities of the Cliffs board of
directors in connection with the proposed merger.
On July 13, 2008, Alpha held a special meeting of its board
of directors at which the directors, in consultation with
management and representatives of Citi and Cleary Gottlieb,
discussed and analyzed the proposed transaction with Cliffs and
considered the other alternatives available to Alpha, including
Alphas stand-alone plan, the possibility of receiving a
proposal from Company 4, the proposed transaction with Company
2, and the relative impact to shareholders of these different
alternatives, including illustrative financial metrics prepared
by Citi indicating that the proposed transaction with Cliffs
could be more attractive, from a financial point of view, to
Alphas stockholders than the proposed combination with
Company 2, given certain financial assumptions. Management
informed the board that, despite requests to representatives of
Company 4 and its financial advisor, Company 4 had not submitted
a revised proposal to acquire Alpha, nor had it signaled its
intention to do so in due course. Management also informed the
Alpha board that the negotiations with Company 2 remained
stalled due to the insistence by Company 2 that Alpha bear all
risk, without any limitation, relating to financing. In
addition, Alpha was still awaiting the commitment letter from
the banks as to financing the Company 2 acquisition.
Alphas management updated the board regarding the results
of its legal and financial due diligence investigation of
Cliffs.
55
Representatives of Cleary Gottlieb and Citi reviewed for the
board the terms of the draft merger agreement with Cliffs,
including the remaining open issues, and the timing and process
of the proposed merger. In addition, representatives of Cleary
Gottlieb and Citi reiterated to the board that, under Ohio law,
the transaction would require the approval of two-thirds of
Cliffs outstanding shares and that Harbinger Capital
Partners would therefore play a very important role in
determining whether shareholder approval would be obtained. Citi
reviewed with the board certain financial information regarding
the proposed transactions under consideration. Alphas
board of directors then instructed management to continue
negotiations with Cliffs in order to resolve the remaining legal
issues on the merger agreement, to see if the consideration
offered by Cliffs could be enhanced, and to require Cliffs to
consult with Harbinger Capital Partners to determine whether
Harbinger Capital Partners would oppose this transaction. The
Alpha board instructed management that it should focus its
efforts on obtaining enhanced merger consideration value, rather
than negotiating for any additional benefits relating to social
issues, such as board representation.
During the evening of July 13, 2008, representatives of
Jones Day delivered to Cleary Gottlieb a
mark-up of
the merger agreement in response to comments provided by Cleary
Gottlieb on July 11, 2008.
During the course of July 14 and 15, 2008, representatives of
Cliffs and Jones Day, on the one hand, and Alpha and Cleary
Gottlieb, on the other hand, continued negotiating the terms of
the merger agreement in detail.
During the morning of July 14, 2008, representatives of
Cliffs and Alpha and their respective advisors discussed the
terms of the merger agreement relating to the required approvals
of Cliffs and Alpha stockholders. Representatives from Cleary
Gottlieb and Alpha reiterated the view that Alphas board
of directors believed very strongly that Cliffs should discuss
the proposed transaction with Harbinger Capital Partners prior
to the execution of a definitive merger agreement.
During the afternoon of July 14, 2008, Mr. Quillen
called Mr. Carrabba to reiterate the Alpha board of
directors desire to have Cliffs obtain from Harbinger
Capital Partners some indication that Harbinger Capital Partners
was not opposed to the transaction. Mr. Quillen also
informed Mr. Carrabba that Alphas board of directors
would not accept the offer of $13.78 in cash plus one Cliffs
common share for each share of Alpha common stock. Based on the
closing price of Cliffs stock on July 11, 2008, the most
recent trading day prior to July 14, the value of such
consideration was $123.19, which represented an implied premium
of approximately 27% as of July 11, 2008. Mr. Quillen
also advised Mr. Carrabba that Alpha was looking for the
merger consideration to represent an implied premium, to the
then-market price, in the range of 36% and asked Cliffs to come
back with its best offer.
Later on July 14, 2008, after consultation with certain
members of the Cliffs board of directors, J.P. Morgan and
Ms. Brlas, Mr. Carrabba called Mr. Quillen to
inform him that Cliffs would be willing to increase the value of
its offer by increasing the cash component of the merger
consideration from $13.78 to $22.23 per share and reducing the
stock portion of the merger consideration from 1 to 0.95 common
share of Cliffs for each share of Alpha common stock. Based on
the closing price of Cliffs stock on July 14, 2008, the
value of such consideration was $130.00 per share, which
represented an implied premium of approximately 32% as of such
date. Mr. Quillen advised Mr. Carrabba that he would
recommend this revised proposal to the board of Alpha, but first
Alpha needed assurance that Cliffs would reach out to Harbinger
Capital Partners before Alphas board meeting. Executives
of and advisors to Cliffs indicated to executives of and
advisors to Alpha that, while Cliffs believed that Harbinger
Capital Partners would approve of the proposed transaction based
on recent discussions Harbinger Capital Partners had with Cliffs
about Cliffs strategy to expand further into coal, Cliffs
would accommodate Alphas request that Cliffs speak
directly to Harbinger Capital Partners about this transaction to
obtain its reaction.
On July 15, 2008 Mr. Quillen contacted the Chief
Executive Officer of Company 2 to advise him that it looked
likely Alpha would pursue an alternative deal. In addition,
Mr. Quillen briefed the Chief Executive Officer of Company
2 that the banks had proposed financing terms for the
combination of Alpha and Company 2 that were unattractive in
several respects, including an interest rate that was
substantially above Alphas current interest rate. The
Chief Executive Officer of Company 2 asked for a few hours to
consider if there were any terms of Company 2s proposed
combination with Alpha that Company 2 wished to revise. Shortly
thereafter, Company 2 delivered a letter to Alpha that indicated
that it would be prepared to proceed with the proposed all-stock
transaction between Company 2 and Alpha with a structure where
Alpha would pay a reverse termination fee in the event the
financing were not disbursed. The letter indicated that Company
2 expected the terms of the proposed transaction, including the
economics, to otherwise remain unchanged from the previous
discussions.
56
On July 15, 2008, Company 4 communicated to a senior
executive of Alpha that Company 4 appreciated Alphas
cooperation in the process of conducting due diligence with
respect to Alpha that Company 4 had recently completed, but was
declining the opportunity to submit a revised proposal to
acquire Alpha.
Also on July 15, 2008, the Cliffs board of directors met to
discuss the final terms and conditions of the draft merger
agreement. Also in attendance were members of Cliffs
management and representatives of J.P. Morgan and Jones
Day. Representatives of Jones Day and Cliffs management
then reviewed with the Cliffs board of directors the final
changes to the merger agreement, which had been provided to the
directors prior to the meeting, discussed the status of the
negotiations with Alpha, and the terms of Cliffs financing
commitment letters from J.P. Morgan and JPMCB. Jones Day
reviewed with the board members their fiduciary duties in the
context of the proposed transaction. Representatives of
J.P. Morgan then presented an updated financial analysis of
the proposed transaction and delivered its oral opinion to the
Cliffs board of directors, which was subsequently confirmed the
same day in writing, that, as of July 15, 2008, based upon
and subject to the various factors and assumptions set forth in
the opinion, the merger consideration to be paid by Cliffs to
the Alpha stockholders in the proposed merger was fair, from a
financial point of view, to Cliffs. The full text of the written
opinion by J.P. Morgan, which sets forth the assumptions
made, general procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the scope of the review undertaken by
J.P. Morgan in concluding its financial analysis and
rendering its opinion, is attached as Annex C to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
At the conclusion of the July 15, 2008 meeting, the Cliffs
board of directors unanimously adopted resolutions approving the
merger agreement with Alpha, the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, declaring the
merger advisable and in the best interests of Cliffs
shareholders, authorizing Cliffs to enter into the merger
agreement and recommending that the Cliffs shareholders adopt
the merger agreement and approve the issuance of the Cliffs
common shares in connection with the merger.
Immediately following the conclusion of the July 15, 2008
Cliffs board meeting, Mr. Carrabba called a senior
representative of Harbinger Capital Partners. Prior to engaging
in any discussions with this senior representative of Harbinger
Capital Partners, Mr. Carrabba obtained an agreement from
him to keep the information to be discussed confidential and not
to engage in any trading so as to ensure compliance with
Cliffs obligations under the federal securities laws.
Having obtained the senior representatives agreement with
respect to confidentiality, Mr. Carrabba informed him that
Cliffs was about to execute an agreement to acquire Alpha in a
cash and stock transaction and described the terms of the
transaction. During this conversation, the senior representative
of Harbinger Capital Partners indicated that he would be looking
for more information about the transaction but gave no
indication that Harbinger Capital Partners would oppose the
transaction. After this conversation, Mr. Carrabba informed
Mr. Quillen that Cliffs had presented the proposed
transaction with Alpha to a senior representative of Harbinger
Capital Partners in a confidential telephone call after the
market closed on July 15, 2008. Mr. Carrabba stated
that he believed Harbinger Capital Partners would support the
transaction.
In the evening of July 15, 2008, Alpha held a special
meeting of its board of directors at which the directors, in
consultation with management, Citi and Cleary Gottlieb, reviewed
and discussed the terms of the draft merger agreement, the terms
of the debt commitment letter obtained by Cliffs to finance the
transaction, the legal standards applicable to the boards
decision-making processes, and financial analyses of the
proposed transaction with Cliffs and the alternatives available
to Alpha, including its stand-alone plan and the proposed
transaction with Company 2. The board also considered the latest
communication from Company 4 and the latest communication from
Mr. Carrabba concerning his July 15, 2008 conversation
with a senior representative of Harbinger Capital Partners.
Representatives of Citi made a presentation to the board about
the proposed transaction and Alphas alternatives. In
connection with the deliberation by the Alpha board of
directors, Citi rendered to the Alpha board of directors its
oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing on the
same date, to the effect that, as of the date of the opinion and
based upon and subject to the considerations and limitations set
forth in the opinion, the presentation of financial analyses by
Citi that accompanied the delivery of the opinion and other
factors it deemed relevant, the merger consideration was fair,
from a financial point of view, to the holders of Alpha common
stock. The full text of Citis opinion, which sets forth
the assumptions made, general procedures followed, matters
considered and limits on the review undertaken, is included as
Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Following these discussions, and review and discussion among the
members of the Alpha board of directors, including consideration
of the factors described under Alphas
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of Alphas Board of
57
Directors, the Alpha board of directors determined that
the merger, the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement were advisable and fair to
and in the best interests of Alpha and its stockholders, and the
directors (with Mr. Brinzo abstaining due to his prior
relationship with Cliffs) voted unanimously to approve the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement.
The merger agreement was executed by Cliffs, merger sub, and
Alpha on July 15, 2008. On July 16, 2008, prior to the
commencement of trading on the NYSE, Cliffs and Alpha issued a
joint press release announcing the signing of the merger
agreement.
On July 17, 2008, as part of a series of meetings with
various Cliffs shareholders and Alpha stockholders to discuss
the merger, Mr. Carrabba, Ms. Brlas and
Mr. Quillen met with the senior representative of Harbinger
Capital Partners. Immediately following the meeting, a
Schedule 13D filed with the SEC by Harbinger Capital
Partners became publicly available, asserting that the merger
was not in the best interests of Cliffs shareholders. According
to the Schedule 13D, Harbinger Capital Partners made the
filing in order to reserve the right to be in contact with
members of Cliffs management and board of directors.
On August 12, 2008, Mr. Carrabba received a call from
the senior representative of Harbinger Capital Partners, who
informed Mr. Carrabba that Cliffs should expect to receive
a letter from Harbinger Capital Partners indicating its
intention to effectuate certain block trades of Cliffs shares in
the near future.
On August 14, 2008, Harbinger Capital Partners delivered to
Cliffs an acquiring person statement, or the
acquiring person statement, pursuant to the Ohio Control Share
Acquisition Statute. Harbinger Capital Partners indicated in its
acquiring person statement that it intended to acquire a number
of Cliffs shares that, when added to the Harbinger Capital
Partners current holdings in Cliffs common shares, would
increase its voting power in the election of Cliffs
directors to greater than one-fifth, but less than one-third, of
the combined voting power of Cliffs common shares. Such an
acquisition, which is a control share acquisition within the
meaning of the Ohio Control Share Acquisition Statute, requires
approval of the holders of at least a majority of voting power
of all Cliffs shares entitled to vote in the election of the
directors represented at the meeting (excluding the voting power
of all interested shares (within the meaning of the
Ohio Control Share Acquisition Statute)).
On August 15, 2008, the Cliffs board of directors held a
special meeting at which it discussed with senior management and
representatives from Jones Day and J.P. Morgan, among other
matters, the acquiring person statement delivered by Harbinger
Capital Partners.
On August 18, 2008, Mr. Carrabba called the senior
representative of Harbinger Capital Partners to request a
meeting to discuss its acquiring person statement and
Schedule 13D.
On August 20, 2008, Mr. Carrabba and Ms. Brlas
met with both the Senior Managing Director and the senior
representative of Harbinger Capital Partners. Cliffs did not
provide Harbinger Capital Partners with any non-public
information. The parties discussed industry trends within iron
ore and coal and also discussed the transaction with Alpha.
Neither the Senior Managing Director nor the senior
representative of Harbinger Capital Partners presented any
demands or proposals to Cliffs on behalf of Harbinger Capital
Partners and Cliffs did not make any proposals to Harbinger
Capital Partners.
On August 21, 2008, the Cliffs board of directors held a
special meeting at which it discussed with senior management and
representatives from Jones Day and J.P. Morgan, among other
matters, the acquiring person statement delivered by Harbinger
Capital Partners. After an extensive discussion with
Cliffs management and representatives from Jones Day and
J.P. Morgan, the Cliffs board of directors unanimously
determined that the Harbinger control share acquisition proposal
was not in the best interests of Cliffs shareholders.
On September 8, 2008, Cliffs filed with the SEC a
definitive proxy statement in opposition to the Harbinger
control share acquisition proposal unanimously recommending that
the Cliffs shareholders vote against the authorization of the
Harbinger control share acquisition proposal. On the same date,
Harbinger Capital Partners filed its definitive proxy statement
soliciting proxies for its control share acquisition proposal.
On September 19, 2008, Cliffs announced that RiskMetrics
Group (formerly Institutional Shareholder Services, or ISS),
Glass Lewis & Co. and PROXY Governance, Inc., three leading
independent proxy advisory
58
firms, recommended that Cliffs shareholders vote against the
Harbinger control share acquisition proposal at Cliffs
special meeting of shareholders that was held on October 3,
2008.
On October 3, 2008, Cliffs held a special meeting of its
shareholders to vote on the Harbinger control share acquisition
proposal. On October 10, 2008, Cliffs announced that, based
on the results provided by the independent inspector of
elections, IVS Associates, Inc., Cliffs shareholders rejected
the Harbinger control share acquisition proposal.
Alphas
Reasons for the Merger and Recommendation of Alphas Board
of Directors
In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and
recommend the merger to its stockholders, the Alpha board of
directors consulted with Alphas management, as well as
legal and financial advisors, and considered a number of
factors, including those listed below.
The Alpha board of directors considered the following factors as
generally supporting its decision to enter into the merger
agreement and recommend the merger to its stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
its knowledge of Alphas business, operations, financial
condition, earnings and prospects and of Cliffs business,
operations, financial condition, earnings and prospects, taking
into account the results of Alphas due diligence of Cliffs;
|
|
|
|
its knowledge of the current environment in the mining industry,
including economic conditions, continued consolidation, current
financial market conditions and the likely effects of these
factors on Alphas, Cliffs and the combined
companys potential growth, development, productivity and
strategic options;
|
|
|
|
the financial terms of the merger, including the fact that,
based on the closing prices on the NYSE of Cliffs common shares
on July 15, 2008 (the last trading day prior to
announcement of the merger agreement), the value of the merger
consideration represented an approximate 35% premium over the
closing price of Alpha shares as of that date;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Alpha stockholders will receive a portion of the
merger consideration in cash, giving Alpha stockholders an
opportunity to immediately realize value for a portion of their
investment and providing certainty of value, and a portion in
Cliffs common shares, with the result that the Alpha
stockholders will own approximately 37% of the combined
companys equity, and benefit from the expected gains from
the merger;
|
|
|
|
its belief, after reviewing Alphas potential strategic
alternatives to the merger with Cliffs, including a merger or
other strategic transaction with another third party, and taking
into account the preliminary discussions with other third
parties (see Background of the Merger
beginning on page 48), that it was unlikely that another
party would make or accept an offer to engage in a transaction
with Alpha that would be more favorable to Alpha and its
stockholders than the merger with Cliffs;
|
|
|
|
its belief that the two companies would create a larger and more
diversified institution that is both better equipped to respond
to economic and industry developments and better positioned to
develop and build on its strong market shares in iron ore,
metallurgical coal and thermal coal;
|
|
|
|
the strategic fit and complementary nature of Cliffs and
Alphas respective businesses and the potential presented
by the merger with Cliffs for cost savings opportunities, and
the related potential impact on the combined companys
earnings;
|
|
|
|
the overall competitive positioning of the combined company,
which is expected to be a leading diversified mining company and
major supplier to the global steel industry;
|
|
|
|
the presentation by Alphas financial advisor of financial
analyses of Alpha on a stand-alone basis, the combination of
Alpha and another third party that had expressed an interest in
a merger with Alpha, and of the combination of Alpha and Cliffs;
|
|
|
|
Citis opinion, dated as of July 15, 2008, delivered
to the Alpha board of directors to the effect that, as of the
date of the opinion, and subject to the considerations and
limitations set forth in the opinion, the presentation
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
of financial analyses by Citi that accompanied the delivery of
the opinion and other factors that Citi deemed relevant, the
merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view,
to the holders of Alpha common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the statements by the Chief Executive Officer of Cliffs to Alpha
about his conversations with a senior representative of
Harbinger Capital Partners, the largest shareholder of Cliffs,
about the proposed transaction in a confidential conversation on
July 15, 2008, as well as the fact that, in the event that
Alphas stockholders adopted the merger agreement but the
Cliffs shareholders failed to approve the issuance of shares in
connection with the merger, Alpha would be entitled in some
circumstances to obtain a $100 million termination fee;
|
|
|
|
the structure of the merger and the terms and conditions of the
merger agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the limited closing conditions to Cliffs obligations under
the merger agreement, including, in particular, the fact that
the merger agreement contains no financing contingency or limit
on the obligations of Cliffs in the event of a failure of the
lender to Cliffs to disburse the financing committed for
purposes of this transaction;
|
|
|
|
the provisions of the merger agreement that allow Alpha to
engage in negotiations with, and provide information to, third
parties, under certain circumstances in response to an
unsolicited takeover proposal that Alphas board of
directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its
outside legal advisors and its financial advisors, constitutes
or could reasonably be expected to lead to a transaction that is
more favorable to Alpha stockholders than the merger with Cliffs;
|
|
|
|
the provisions of the merger agreement that allow Alpha, under
certain circumstances, to terminate the merger agreement prior
to its stockholder approval of the merger agreement in order to
enter into an alternative transaction in response to an
unsolicited takeover proposal that Alphas board of
directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its
outside legal advisors and its financial advisors, is more
favorable to Alpha stockholders than the merger with Cliffs;
|
|
|
|
the ability of Alpha to obtain a
break-up fee
of $350 million from Cliffs in the event that Cliffs fails
to consummate the merger under certain circumstances, or a fee
of $100 million if Cliffs shareholders fail to adopt the
merger agreement and approve the issuance of the Cliffs common
shares in connection with the merger (provided that, if
Alphas stockholders do not adopt the merger agreement,
Cliffs will not be required to pay the $100 million
termination fee);
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger is structured as a reorganization for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, which generally allows
Alpha stockholders to refrain from recognizing any gain from the
receipt of the share portion of the merger
consideration; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that Alpha stockholders who do not vote in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement and otherwise follow the
procedures prescribed by the DGCL will have the appraisal rights
in connection with the merger.
|
Alphas board of directors also considered certain
potentially negative factors in its deliberations concerning the
merger, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreements non-solicitation and stockholder
approval covenants, and the requirement that Alpha must pay to
Cliffs a termination fee of $350 million if the merger
agreement is terminated under certain circumstances (which
Alphas board of directors understood was a condition to
Cliffs willingness to enter into the merger agreement and
that could limit the willingness of a third party to propose a
competing business combination with Alpha), or $100 million
if Alpha stockholders fail to adopt the merger agreement
(provided that, if Cliffs shareholders do not adopt the
merger agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs common
shares in connection with the merger, Alpha will not be required
to pay the $100 million termination fee);
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that, under Ohio law, the merger requires the approval
of holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Cliffs and
the fact that a substantial portion of the outstanding shares of
Cliffs are owned by a single shareholder (and its affiliates);
|
|
|
|
the difficulty that Cliffs would have completing the merger if
the financing outlined in the commitment letter received by
Cliffs from J.P. Morgan and JPMCB were not disbursed;
|
|
|
|
the regulatory and other approvals required in connection with
the merger and the possibility that such approvals might not be
received in a timely manner and without unacceptable conditions,
creating the risk that adverse changes to the financial
condition, results of operations, business, competitive
position, reputation and business prospects of either Alpha or
Cliffs could result in fluctuation in the value of the share
portion of the merger consideration to be received by Alpha
stockholders, could adversely affect the value of the combined
company, or could result in the failure to complete the merger;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that management focus and resources at both
Alpha and Cliffs would be diverted from other strategic
opportunities and from operational matters while working to
implement the merger;
|
|
|
|
the requirement that Alpha conduct its business only in the
ordinary course prior to the completion of the merger and
subject to specified restrictions without Cliffs prior
consent (which consent may not be unreasonably withheld, delayed
or conditioned), which might delay or prevent Alpha from
undertaking certain business opportunities that might arise
pending completion of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that some of Alphas directors and executive
officers have other interests in the merger that are in addition
to, and may be different from, their interests as Alpha
stockholders, including as a result of employment and
compensation arrangements with Alpha and the manner in which
they would be affected by the merger. See
Interests of Alpha Directors and Executive
Officers in the Merger beginning on page 83.
|
In the judgment of the Alpha board of directors, however, these
potential risks were outweighed by the potential benefits of the
merger discussed above.
The foregoing discussion of the factors considered by the Alpha
board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but,
rather, includes the material factors considered by the Alpha
board of directors. In reaching its decision to approve the
merger agreement, the Alpha board did not quantify or assign any
relative weights to the factors considered, and individual
directors may have given different weights to different factors.
The Alpha board of directors considered all these factors as a
whole, including discussions with, and questioning of, Alpha
management and Alphas financial and legal advisors, and
overall considered the factors to be favorable to, and to
support, its determination. The Alpha board of directors also
relied on the experience of Citi, its financial advisor, for
analyses of the financial terms of the merger and for its
opinions as to the fairness of the consideration to be received
in the merger to Alpha stockholders.
For the reasons set forth above, the Alpha board of directors
determined that the merger is advisable and fair to and in the
best interests of Alpha and its stockholders, and approved the
merger agreement. The Alpha board of directors recommends that
the Alpha stockholders vote
for
the adoption of the merger agreement.
Cliffs
Reasons for the Merger and Recommendation of Cliffs Board
of Directors
In reaching a conclusion to approve the merger and related
transactions and to recommend that Cliffs shareholders adopt the
merger agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs common
shares in connection with the merger, the Cliffs board of
directors consulted with Cliffs management, as well as
legal and financial advisors. In these consultations, the board
considered a number of factors including:
|
|
|
|
|
that Alpha is the largest metallurgical coal supplier in the
United States, and that the acquisition of Alpha will provide
Cliffs additional exposure to the high-growth steel making raw
materials market;
|
|
|
|
the strategic nature of the acquisition, which will allow both
companies to capitalize on current market dynamics in iron ore
and metallurgical coal, as well as create a stronger platform
for continued strategic
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
investments in the global mining industry. The acquisition will
also provide economies of scale that result from creating one of
the largest mining companies in the United States;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the merger will provide Cliffs with premier coal industry
management, technical and operational expertise via the addition
of Alphas management team;
|
|
|
|
that the acquisition of Alpha will enhance Cliffs product
portfolio in steelmaking raw materials and measured
diversification into other products. The acquisition will
substantially increase Cliffs annual production of
metallurgical coal and optimize the revenues generated from the
combined companys coal reserves;
|
|
|
|
that the acquisition will capitalize on the strong market
condition of the U.S. and global steel industries and
further solidify Cliffs as a major iron ore and metallurgical
coal supplier;
|
|
|
|
the expected synergies, including Alphas unique coal
blending capabilities and preparation plant optimization, that
are anticipated to result in approximately $200 million in
aggregate synergies beginning in 2010;
|
|
|
|
the additional exposure Alpha will provide Cliffs to
international markets via Alphas equity positions in
U.S. port infrastructure and its expanded sales and
marketing network;
|
|
|
|
Cliffs managements view, based on due diligence and
discussions with Alphas management, that Alpha and Cliffs
share common values with respect to
best-in-class
safety standards and practices and the socially responsible
processing of the earths natural resources;
|
|
|
|
that the merger is expected to provide Cliffs with a more
balanced portfolio of existing mines and exploratory
opportunities, thereby giving Cliffs management more flexibility
in its capital allocation decisions;
|
|
|
|
that the combined company will have a diverse geographic reach
with combined coal operations in North America and Australia,
and a number of the properties of the combined company will be
in the same geographic region which may facilitate integration
of those properties and a possible reduction in operating and
administrative costs;
|
|
|
|
that the potential synergies expected to be derived from the
merger present an opportunity for continued and sustained growth
in accordance with Cliffs strategic plan for growth, as
well as geographic and mineral diversification;
|
|
|
|
the Cliffs boards knowledge of Cliffs business,
operations, financial condition, earnings and prospects and of
Alphas business, operations, financial condition, earnings
and prospects, taking into account the results of Cliffs
due diligence of Alpha;
|
|
|
|
the Cliffs boards knowledge of the current environment in
the mining industry, including economic conditions, continued
consolidation, current financial market conditions and the
likely effects of these factors on Cliffs, Alphas,
and the combined companys potential growth, development,
productivity and strategic options;
|
|
|
|
the information concerning the financial conditions, results of
operations, prospects and businesses of Cliffs and Alpha,
including the respective companies reserves, production
volumes, cash flows from operations, recent performance of
common shares and the ratio of Cliffs share price to Alpha stock
price over various periods, as well as current industry,
economic and market conditions;
|
|
|
|
the results of the business, legal and financial due diligence
review of Alphas businesses and operations;
|
|
|
|
that the exchange ratio will enable Cliffs shareholders to own
approximately 63% of the outstanding stock of the combined
company;
|
|
|
|
the determination that an exchange ratio that is fixed is
appropriate to reflect the strategic purpose of the merger and
that a fixed exchange ratio avoids fluctuations caused by
near-term market volatility;
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including the
following:
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Alpha agreed to pay a termination fee of
$100 million to Cliffs in the event that the merger
agreement is terminated due to a failure to obtain necessary
approval from Alpha stockholders (provided that, if Cliffs
shareholders do not adopt the merger agreement and approve the
issuance of the Cliffs common shares in connection with the
merger, Alpha will not be required to pay the $100 million
termination fee);
|
|
|
|
the fact that Cliffs may be entitled to receive a
$350 million termination fee from Alpha if the merger is
not consummated for certain reasons as more fully described in
the section titled The Merger Agreement
Termination Fees beginning on page 112;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the conditions required to be satisfied prior to
completion of the merger are customary thereby increasing the
likelihood of the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the fact that two members of the Alpha board of directors are
expected to be appointed to the Cliffs board of directors, which
is expected to provide a degree of continuity and involvement by
Alpha directors in the combined company following the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that, subject to certain exceptions, Alpha is
prohibited from taking certain actions that would be deemed to
be a solicitation under the merger agreement, including
solicitation, initiation, encouragement of any inquiries or the
making of any proposals for certain types of business
combination or acquisition of Alpha (or entering into any
agreement for such business combination or acquisition of Alpha
or any requiring to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the
merger); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.P. Morgans opinion, including its analysis rendered
orally on July 15, 2008 and confirmed in writing on the
same date, to the effect that, as of July 15, 2008, and
based on and subject to various factors and assumptions set
forth in its written opinion, the consideration proposed to be
paid by Cliffs to Alpha stockholders in the merger was fair,
from a financial point of view, to Cliffs.
|
The Cliffs board of directors also considered the potential
adverse impact of other factors weighing negatively against the
merger, including, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that a substantial or extended decline in coal prices
would likely make the merger less desirable from a financial
point of view;
|
|
|
|
the potential dilution to Cliffs shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the risk of diverting managements attention from other
strategic opportunities in order to implement merger integration
efforts;
|
|
|
|
the challenges of combining the businesses, operations and
workforces of Cliffs and Alpha and realizing the anticipated
cost savings and operating synergies;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the parties may incur significant costs and delays
resulting from seeking governmental consents and approvals
necessary for completion of the proposed merger;
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the requirement that Cliffs must pay to Alpha a termination fee
of $350 million if the merger agreement is terminated under
circumstances specified in the merger agreement, as described in
the section titled The Merger Agreement
Termination Fees beginning on page 112;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Cliffs agreed to pay a termination fee of
$100 million to Alpha in the event that the merger
agreement is terminated due to a failure to obtain necessary
Cliffs shareholder approval (provided that, if Alpha
stockholders fail to adopt the merger agreement, Cliffs will not
be required to pay the $100 million termination fee), as
described in the section titled The Merger
Agreement Termination Fees beginning on
page 112; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that the terms of the merger agreement provide that,
under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions
more fully described in the section titled The Merger
Agreement Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation by Alpha beginning on page 103, Alpha
may furnish information to and
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
conduct negotiations with a third party in connection with an
unsolicited proposal for a business combination or acquisition
of Alpha that is likely to lead to a superior proposal and the
Alpha board of directors can terminate the merger agreement in
order to accept a superior proposal or, under certain
circumstances, change its recommendation that Alpha stockholders
adopt the merger agreement prior to Alpha stockholders
approval of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Alpha stockholders who dissent from the merger
will have appraisal rights, as described in the section titled
Appraisal Rights of Alpha Stockholders,
beginning on page 87;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Cliffs shareholders who dissent from the merger
will have dissenters rights as described in the section
titled Dissenters Rights of Cliffs
Shareholders, beginning on page 90; and
|
|
|
|
the risks described in the section titled Risk
Factors beginning on page 27.
|
In the judgment of the Cliffs board of directors, however, the
potential benefits of the merger discussed above outweigh any
potential risks. The foregoing discussion of the factors
considered by the Cliffs board of directors is not intended to
be exhaustive, but, rather, includes the material factors
considered by the Cliffs board of directors. In reaching its
decision to approve the merger agreement, the Cliffs board did
not quantify or assign any relative weights to the factors
considered, and individual directors may have given different
weights to different factors.
Cliffs board of directors has approved the merger
agreement and determined that the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement are advisable and in the best interests of
Cliffs and its shareholders. Cliffs board of directors
recommends that Cliffs shareholders vote
for
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the
issuance of Cliffs common shares pursuant to the terms of the
merger agreement at the Cliffs special meeting.
Opinion
of Alphas Financial Advisor
Citi was retained to act as financial advisor to Alpha to render
certain financial advisory and investment banking services in
connection with the merger. Pursuant to Citis engagement
letter with Alpha, dated July 15, 2008 (which memorialized
Citis engagement by Alpha beginning on June 9, 2008),
on July 15, 2008, Citi rendered its oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing to the Alpha board of
directors on the same date, to the effect that, as of the date
of the opinion and based upon and subject to the considerations
and limitations set forth in the opinion, its work described
below and other factors it deemed relevant, the merger
consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of Alpha common stock.
The full text of Citis opinion, which sets forth the
assumptions made, general procedures followed, matters
considered and limits on the review undertaken, is included as
Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The summary of Citis opinion set forth below is qualified
by reference to the full text of the opinion. Holders of Alpha
common stock are urged to read the Citi opinion carefully and in
its entirety.
Citis opinion was limited solely to the fairness of the
merger consideration from a financial point of view to the
holders of Alpha common stock as of the date of the opinion.
Neither Citis opinion nor the related analyses constituted
a recommendation of the proposed merger to the Alpha board of
directors. Citi makes no recommendation to any stockholder
regarding how such stockholder should vote with respect to the
merger.
In arriving at its opinion, Citi reviewed a draft dated
July 14, 2008 of the merger agreement and held discussions
with certain senior officers, directors and other
representatives and advisors of Alpha and certain senior
officers and other representatives and advisors of Cliffs
concerning the businesses, operations and prospects of Alpha and
Cliffs. Citi examined certain publicly available business and
financial information relating to Alpha and Cliffs as well as
certain financial forecasts and other information and data
relating to Alpha and Cliffs which were provided to or discussed
with Citi by the respective managements of Alpha and Cliffs,
including information relating to the potential strategic
implications and operational benefits (including the amount,
timing and achievability thereof) anticipated by the managements
of Alpha and Cliffs to result from the merger. Citi reviewed the
financial terms of the merger as set forth in the merger
agreement in relation to, among other things: current and
historical market prices and trading volumes of Alpha common
stock and Cliffs common shares; the historical and projected
earnings and other operating data of Alpha and Cliffs; and the
capitalization and financial condition of
64
Alpha and Cliffs. Citi considered and analyzed certain
financial, stock market and other publicly available information
relating to the businesses of other companies whose operations
it considered relevant in evaluating those of Alpha and Cliffs.
Citi also evaluated certain potential pro forma financial
effects of the merger on Cliffs. In connection with Citis
engagement, Citi advised Alpha on discussions it had with
selected third parties with respect to the possible acquisition
of, or other combination with, Alpha. In addition to the
foregoing, Citi conducted such other analyses and examinations
and considered such other information and financial, economic
and market criteria as it deemed appropriate in arriving at its
opinion.
In rendering its opinion, Citi assumed and relied, without
independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of
all financial and other information and data publicly available
or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Citi
and upon the assurances of the managements of Alpha and Cliffs
that they were not aware of any relevant information that was
omitted or that remained undisclosed to Citi. With respect to
financial forecasts and other information and data relating to
Alpha and Cliffs provided to or otherwise reviewed by or
discussed with Citi, Citi was advised by the respective
managements of Alpha and Cliffs that such forecasts and other
information and data were reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the managements of Alpha and Cliffs as to the future
financial performance of Alpha and Cliffs, the potential
strategic implications and operational benefits (including the
amount, timing and achievability thereof) anticipated to result
from the merger and the other matters covered thereby.
In rendering its opinion, Citi assumed, with Alphas
consent, that the merger would be consummated in accordance with
its terms, without waiver, modification or amendment of any
material term, condition or agreement and that, in the course of
obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals,
consents and releases for the merger, no delay, limitation,
restriction or condition would be imposed that would have an
adverse effect on Alpha, Cliffs or the contemplated benefits of
the merger. Representatives of Alpha advised Citi, and Citi
further assumed, that the final terms of the merger agreement
would not vary materially from those set forth in the draft
reviewed by Citi. Citi also assumed, with Alphas consent,
that the merger would be treated as a tax-free reorganization
for federal income tax purposes. Citi has not expressed any
opinion as to what the value of the Cliffs common shares
actually would be when issued pursuant to the merger or the
price at which the Cliffs common shares would trade at any time.
Citi did not make and was not provided with an independent
evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent
or otherwise) of Alpha or Cliffs nor did it make any physical
inspection of the properties or assets of Alpha or Cliffs.
Citis opinion did not address the underlying business
decision of Alpha to effect the merger, the relative merits of
the merger as compared to any alternative business strategies
that might exist for Alpha or the effect of any other
transaction in which Alpha might engage. Citi also expressed no
view as to, and its opinion did not address, the fairness
(financial or otherwise) of the amount or nature or any other
aspect of any compensation to any officers, directors or
employees of any parties to the merger, or any class of such
persons, relative to the merger consideration. Citis
opinion was necessarily based upon information available to it,
and financial, stock market and other conditions and
circumstances existing, as of the date of the opinion.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Citi made a
presentation to the Alpha board of directors on July 15,
2008 with respect to the material analyses performed by Citi in
evaluating the fairness of the merger consideration. The
following is a summary of that presentation. The summary
includes information presented in tabular format. In order to
understand fully the financial analyses used by Citi, these
tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The
tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the
financial analyses. The following quantitative information,
to the extent it is based on market data, is, except as
otherwise indicated, based on market data as it existed at or
prior to July 14, 2008, and is not necessarily indicative
of current or future market conditions.
Alpha
Valuation Analyses
Historical
Stock Prices
To provide background information and perspective with respect
to the historical share prices of Alpha common stock, Citi
reviewed the stock price performance of Alpha during the 52-week
period ending on July 14, 2008.
65
Citi noted that the range of low and high trading prices of
Alpha common stock during the 52-week period ending on
July 14, 2008 was approximately $16.00 and $109.00,
respectively. Citi noted that Alphas closing share price
on July 14, 2008 was $98.72. Citi also noted that the
implied per share merger consideration as of July 14, 2008
was $130.00, consisting of $22.23 per share in cash and 0.95 of
a Cliffs common share (with a value of $107.77 as of market
close on July 14, 2008).
Wall
Street Equity Research Analyst Stock Price Targets
To provide background information and perspective with respect
to stock price targets of Alpha common stock, Citi reviewed
publicly available published price target estimates for Alpha
common stock set by Wall Street equity research analysts.
Citi observed that the analyst price targets ranged from $75.00
to $178.00 per share of Alpha common stock, and ranged from
$78.00 to $125.00 per share of Alpha common stock if the lowest
and highest price targets of the group were excluded. Citi also
observed that the median analyst price target was $105.00 per
share of Alpha common stock. Citi noted that the implied per
share merger consideration as of July 14, 2008 was $130.00.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Using projections provided by the management of Alpha, Citi
conducted discounted cash flow analyses of Alpha for the
relevant periods to calculate ranges of implied per share equity
values of Alpha. A discounted cash flow analysis is a method of
determining the value of a company using estimates of the future
unlevered free cash flows generated by the company and taking
into consideration the time value of money with respect to those
future cash flows by calculating their present
value. Present value refers to the current
value of future cash flows generated by the company, and is
obtained by discounting those cash flows back to the present
using a discount rate that takes into account macro-economic
assumptions and estimates of risk, the opportunity cost of
capital, capitalized returns and other appropriate factors.
Terminal value refers to the capitalized value of
all cash flows generated by the company for periods beyond the
final forecast period.
These cash flows were prepared based on the four alternative
scenarios described below:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Historical Met Coal / Management Steam Coal Case is
based on, for committed tonnage, Alpha management estimates of
future sales under existing commitments principally covering
fiscal years 2008 and 2009 and, for uncommitted tonnage, a
constant metallurgical coal price estimate determined by the
average of historical monthly metallurgical coal prices for the
calendar years 2005, 2006 and 2007, and Alpha management
estimates of future steam coal prices; |
|
(2) |
|
Wall Street Consensus Case is based on, for
committed tonnage, Alpha management estimates of future sales
under existing commitments principally covering fiscal years
2008 and 2009 and, for uncommitted tonnage, the average of Wall
Street equity research estimates, selected by Citi on the basis
of availability, of future metallurgical and steam coal prices; |
|
(3) |
|
Company Case 1 is based on, for committed tonnage,
Alpha management estimates of future sales under existing
commitments principally covering fiscal years 2008 and 2009 and,
for uncommitted tonnage, Alpha management estimates of future
metallurgical coal prices, which generally assume that such
future prices for uncommitted tonnage decline annually beyond
fiscal year 2008, and steam coal prices. For fiscal years 2008
through 2011, Alpha management estimates of future metallurgical
coal prices generally correlated with those published in Wall
Street equity research reports, selected by Citi on the basis of
availability. The majority of such Wall Street equity research
estimates projected a declining price curve; and |
|
(4) |
|
Company Case 2 is based on, for committed tonnage,
Alpha management estimates of future sales under existing
commitments principally covering fiscal years 2008 and 2009 and,
for uncommitted tonnage, Alpha management estimates of future
metallurgical coal prices, which generally assume that such
future prices for uncommitted tonnage remain relatively flat
through fiscal year 2012, and steam coal prices. Alpha
management estimates of future metallurgical coal prices
considered Alpha managements view of current and possible
future supply and demand fundamentals of the metallurgical coal
market, and the increased level of strategic interest in
U.S. metallurgical coal assets demonstrated by
international steel companies. |
66
Estimates of future steam coal prices for uncommitted tonnage
are identical in Historical Met Coal / Management
Steam Coal Case, Company Case 1 and Company Case 2, and
generally assume that such future prices for uncommitted tonnage
remain relatively flat through fiscal year 2012. In Alpha
managements view, such future prices represented a
discount to current market prices, but a premium to historical
market prices, and considered current export activity and supply
and demand fundamentals of the steam coal market.
Citi derived the discounted cash flow values for Alpha as the
sum of the net present values of (1) the estimated
unlevered free cash flows that Alpha would generate from
July 16, 2008 through fiscal year 2012 and (2) the
terminal value of Alpha at the end of fiscal year 2012. The
terminal value for Alpha was calculated by applying a range of
EBITDA terminal value multiples of 5.0x to 6.0x to Alphas
fiscal year 2012 estimated earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (or EBITDA). The cash
flows and terminal values were discounted to present value using
discount rates ranging from 10.1% to 12.8%. This range
represented Alphas estimated weighted average cost of
capital as derived by Citi based on, among other assumptions,
market data for Alpha and a number of selected companies in the
coal mining sector which, in Citis determination, had
businesses and operating profiles reasonably similar to those of
Alpha. Based on this analysis of Alpha and the selected
comparable companies, Citi determined that the range of discount
rates it derived was appropriate for this discounted cash flow
analysis. However, because of the inherent differences among the
businesses, operations and prospects of Alpha and the
businesses, operations and prospects of the selected comparable
companies, no comparable company is exactly the same as Alpha.
Alpha did not supply Citi with, nor did Citi rely on, any Alpha
management estimates of the discount rates used by Alpha
management in generating its own internal financial analyses.
This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per
share equity reference ranges for Alpha:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
|
|
Equity Reference
|
|
|
|
Range for Alpha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Met Coal/Management Steam Coal Case
|
|
$
|
39.00 $ 48.00
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Case
|
|
$
|
50.00 $ 57.00
|
|
Company Case 1
|
|
$
|
82.00 $ 98.00
|
|
Company Case 2
|
|
$
|
143.00 $174.00
|
|
Citi noted the implied per share equity reference ranges
calculated above for each of the four alternative scenarios.
Citi also noted that the implied per share merger consideration
as of July 14, 2008 was $130.00. Citi compared the implied
per share equity reference ranges above to the implied per share
merger consideration.
Comparable
Companies Analysis
Citi compared financial, operating and stock market information,
and forecasted financial information for Alpha with that of
selected publicly traded U.S. coal producers in the Central
Appalachia basin and pure play U.S. metallurgical coal
producers. The selected comparable companies considered by Citi
were:
|
|
|
|
|
International Coal Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
James River Coal Company
|
|
|
|
Massey Energy Company
|
|
|
|
Walter Industries, Inc.
|
The financial information used by Citi for the selected
comparable companies was based on company filings and selected
Wall Street equity research reports, and for Alpha, Alpha
management estimates. All of the multiples were calculated using
public trading market closing prices on July 14, 2008.
For each of the selected comparable companies, Citi derived and
compared, among other things, the multiple of each
companys firm value to its EBITDA for the estimated
calendar years 2009 and 2010. Citi calculated firm value as
(a) equity value, based on the per share closing stock
price on July 14, 2008 of all fully diluted shares assuming
the exercise or conversion of all in-the-money options, warrants
and convertible securities outstanding, less the proceeds of any
such options or warrants, as reflected in each companys
latest publicly available information; plus
(b) non-convertible indebtedness; plus (c) minority
interests; plus (d) non-convertible preferred
67
stock; plus (e) all out-of-the-money convertible
securities; minus (f) cash and cash equivalents; minus
(g) investments in unconsolidated affiliates.
Due to the significant increase in projected metallurgical and
steam coal prices by Wall Street equity research analysts prior
to the execution of the merger agreement, Citi observed that
estimates of EBITDA for the calendar years 2009 and 2010 varied
meaningfully among Wall Street equity research analysts and that
such estimates tended to be higher in more recently published
research reports. As a result, Citi considered for each of the
selected comparable companies (i) the average of selected
Wall Street equity research estimates (or Wall Street
Consensus Estimates) and (ii) the average of the top
quartile of such Wall Street Consensus Estimates (or Wall
Street Top Quartile Estimates).
Based on the comparable companies analysis and taking into
consideration other performance metrics and qualitative
judgments, Citi derived the following reference range of firm
value / EBITDA multiples for calendar years 2009 and
2010:
i. 6.5x to 7.5x for calendar year 2009 estimated EBITDA and
4.5x to 5.5x for calendar year 2010 estimated EBITDA, based on
Wall Street Consensus Estimates; and
ii. 5.0x to 6.0x for calendar year 2009 estimated EBITDA
and 4.0x to 4.5x for calendar year 2010 estimated EBITDA, based
on Wall Street Top Quartile Estimates.
Citi then applied these multiples to Alphas estimated
EBITDA for calendar years 2009 and 2010 under the four
alternative scenarios described above. This analysis indicated
the following implied per share equity reference ranges for
Alpha:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
|
|
Equity Reference
|
|
|
|
Range for Alpha
|
|
|
Historical Met Coal / Management Steam Coal Case
|
|
|
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Estimates
|
|
$
|
50.00 $ 60.00
|
|
Wall Street Top Quartile Estimates
|
|
$
|
40.00 $ 45.00
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Case
|
|
|
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Estimates
|
|
$
|
100.00 $120.00
|
|
Wall Street Top Quartile Estimates
|
|
$
|
80.00 $ 95.00
|
|
Company Case 1
|
|
|
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Estimates
|
|
$
|
105.00 $125.00
|
|
Wall Street Top Quartile Estimates
|
|
$
|
85.00 $100.00
|
|
Company Case 2
|
|
|
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Estimates
|
|
$
|
145.00 $170.00
|
|
Wall Street Top Quartile Estimates
|
|
$
|
120.00 $140.00
|
|
Citi noted the implied per share equity reference ranges
calculated above for each of the four alternative scenarios.
Citi also noted that the implied per share merger consideration
as of July 14, 2008 was $130.00. Citi compared the implied
per share equity reference ranges above to the implied merger
consideration.
Citi selected the comparable companies used in the comparable
companies analysis because their businesses and operating
profiles are reasonably similar to those of Alpha. However,
because of the inherent differences among the businesses,
operations and prospects of Alpha and the businesses, operations
and prospects of the selected comparable companies, no
comparable company is exactly the same as Alpha. Therefore, Citi
believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did not,
rely solely on the quantitative results of the comparable
companies analysis. Accordingly, Citi made qualitative judgments
concerning differences between the financial and operating
characteristics and prospects of Alpha and the companies
included in the comparable companies analysis that would affect
the public trading values of each in order to provide a context
in which to consider the results of the quantitative analysis.
These qualitative judgments related primarily to the differing
sizes, growth prospects, geographic location of assets,
profitability levels and business segments between Alpha and the
companies included in the comparable companies analysis and
other matters, many of which are beyond Alphas control,
such as the
68
impact of competition on its businesses and the industry
generally, industry growth and the absence of any adverse
material change in the financial condition and prospects of
Alpha or the industry or in the financial markets in general.
Mathematical analysis (such as determining the average or
median) is not in itself a meaningful method of using peer group
data.
Selected
Precedent Transactions Analysis
Based upon (1) the significant projected increases in
metallurgical and steam coal prices from calendar year 2008
through 2009, which are generally significantly greater than the
historical increases of such prices, and (2) the
significant projected growth of EBITDA for Alpha from fiscal
year 2008 through 2009, which is generally significantly greater
than the projected growth of EBITDA of target companies involved
in recent precedent transactions in the U.S. coal industry,
Citi did not consider precedent transactions based upon trailing
multiples to be a meaningful benchmark for evaluating the merger
consideration. As a result, while Citi analyzed selected
precedent transactions in the U.S. coal industry, Citi did
not consider this analysis in evaluating the fairness of the
merger consideration.
Confirmatory
Cliffs Valuation Analyses
Citi performed confirmatory valuation analyses with respect to
Cliffs using substantially similar analyses and methodologies to
those used with respect to Alpha, as described above, in order
to assess the value indicated by the per share closing price of
the Cliffs common shares on July 14, 2008 for purposes of
inclusion of this value as part of the transaction
consideration. Citi also presented to the Alpha board of
directors certain other information with respect to Cliffs for
illustrative purposes, including historical stock prices and
Wall Street equity research analyst stock price targets.
Historical
Stock Prices
To provide background information and perspective with respect
to the historical share prices of Cliffs common shares, Citi
reviewed the share price performance of Cliffs during the
52-week period ending on July 14, 2008.
Citi noted that the range of low and high trading prices of
Cliffs common shares during the 52-week period ending on
July 14, 2008 was approximately $28.00 and $122.00,
respectively. Citi noted that Cliffs closing share price
on July 14, 2008 was $113.44.
Wall
Street Equity Research Analyst Stock Price Targets
To provide background information and perspective with respect
to stock price targets of Cliffs common shares, Citi reviewed
publicly available published price target estimates for Cliffs
common shares set by Wall Street equity research analysts.
Citi observed that the analyst price targets ranged from $140.00
to $155.00 per share of Cliffs common shares. Citi also observed
that the median analyst price target was $150.00 per share of
Cliffs common shares. Citi noted that Cliffs closing share
price on July 14, 2008 was $113.44.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Using projections provided by the management of Cliffs, which
were adjusted for certain coal price assumptions made by Alpha
management, Citi conducted discounted cash flow analyses of
Cliffs for the relevant periods to calculate ranges of implied
per share equity values of Cliffs.
These cash flows were prepared based on the three alternative
scenarios described below:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Wall Street Consensus Case is based on Cliffs
management estimates for fiscal year 2008 and the average of
Wall Street equity research estimates, selected by Citi on the
basis of availability, of future North America
(Metallurgical) Coal prices, North America Iron Ore prices, Asia
Pacific Iron Ore prices and Asia Pacific Coal prices for fiscal
years 2009 through 2012; |
69
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Company Case 1 is based on (i) Cliffs
management estimates of future North America Iron Ore prices,
Asia Pacific Iron Ore prices and Asia Pacific Coal prices for
fiscal years 2008 through 2012 and North America
(Metallurgical) Coal prices for fiscal year 2008, and
(ii) Alpha management estimates of future North America
(Metallurgical) Coal prices for fiscal years 2009 through 2012,
which generally assume that such future prices decline annually
beyond fiscal year 2009. For fiscal years 2008 through 2011,
Alpha management estimates of future North America
(Metallurgical) Coal prices generally correlated with those
published in Wall Street equity research reports, selected by
Citi on the basis of availability. The majority of such Wall
Street equity research reports estimates projected a declining
price curve; and |
|
(3) |
|
Company Case 2 is based on (i) Cliffs
management estimates of future North America Iron Ore prices,
Asia Pacific Iron Ore prices and Asia Pacific Coal prices for
fiscal years 2008 through 2012 and North America
(Metallurgical) Coal prices for fiscal year 2008, and
(ii) Alpha management estimates of future North America
(Metallurgical) Coal prices for fiscal years 2009 through 2012,
which generally assume that such future prices remain relatively
flat through fiscal year 2012. Alpha management estimates of
future North America (Metallurgical) Coal prices considered
Alpha managements view of current and possible future
supply and demand fundamentals of the metallurgical coal market
and the increased level of strategic interests in
U.S. metallurgical coal assets demonstrated by
international steel companies. |
|
|
|
Estimates of future North America Iron Ore prices, Asia Pacific
Iron Ore prices and Asia Pacific Coal prices are identical in
Company Case 1 and Company Case 2. |
Citi derived the discounted cash flow values for Cliffs as the
sum of the net present values of (1) the estimated
unlevered free cash flows that Cliffs would generate from
July 16, 2008 through fiscal year 2012 and (2) the
terminal value of Cliffs at the end of fiscal year 2012. The
terminal value for Cliffs was calculated by applying a range of
EBITDA terminal value multiples of 5.0x to 6.0x to Cliffs
fiscal year 2012 estimated EBITDA. The cash flows and terminal
values were discounted to present value using discount rates
ranging from 9.9% to 12.5%. This range represented Cliffs
estimated weighted average cost of capital as derived by Citi
based on, among other assumptions, market data for Cliffs and a
number of selected companies in the iron ore and coal mining
sectors which, in Citis determination, had businesses and
operating profiles reasonably similar to those of Cliffs. Based
on this analysis of Cliffs and the selected comparable
companies, Citi determined that the range of discount rates it
derived was appropriate for this discounted cash flow analysis.
However, because of the inherent differences among the
businesses, operations and prospects of Cliffs and the
businesses, operations and prospects of the selected comparable
companies, no comparable company is exactly the same as Cliffs.
Neither Cliffs nor Alpha supplied Citi with, nor did Citi rely
on, any Cliffs or Alpha management estimates of the discount
rates used by Cliffs or Alpha management, respectively, in
generating their own internal financial analyses. This analysis
indicated the following approximate implied per share equity
reference ranges for Cliffs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
|
|
Equity Reference
|
|
|
|
Range for Cliffs
|
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Case
|
|
$
|
32.00 $ 37.00
|
|
Company Case 1
|
|
$
|
118.00 $146.00
|
|
Company Case 2
|
|
$
|
148.00 $183.00
|
|
Citi noted the implied per share equity reference ranges
calculated above for each of the three alternative scenarios.
Citi also noted that Cliffs closing share price on
July 14, 2008 was $113.44. Citi compared the implied per
share equity reference ranges above to Cliffs closing
share price on July 14, 2008.
Comparable
Companies Analysis
Citi compared financial, operating and stock market information,
and forecasted financial information for Cliffs with that of
selected publicly traded iron ore producers. The selected
comparable companies considered by Citi were:
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce S.A., or Vale
|
|
|
|
Fortescue Metals Group Ltd.
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
Kumba Iron Ore Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Ferrexpo plc
|
|
|
|
Mount Gibson Iron Limited
|
The financial information used by Citi for the selected
comparable companies was based on company filings and selected
Wall Street equity research reports, and for Cliffs, Cliffs
management estimates, which were adjusted for certain coal price
assumptions made by Alpha management. All of the multiples were
calculated using public trading market closing prices on
July 14, 2008.
For each of the selected comparable companies, Citi derived and
compared, among other things, the multiple of each
companys firm value to its EBITDA for the estimated
calendar years 2009 and 2010. Citi calculated firm value as
(a) equity value, based on the per share closing stock
price on July 14, 2008 of all fully diluted shares assuming
the exercise or conversion of all in-the-money options, warrants
and convertible securities outstanding, less the proceeds of any
such options or warrants, as reflected in each companys
latest publicly available information; plus
(b) non-convertible indebtedness; plus (c) minority
interests; plus (d) non-convertible preferred stock; plus
(e) all out-of-the-money convertible securities; minus
(f) cash and cash equivalents; minus (g) investments
in unconsolidated affiliates.
Due to the significant increase in projected iron ore and coal
prices by Wall Street equity research analysts prior to the
execution of the merger agreement, Citi observed that estimates
of EBITDA for the calendar years 2009 and 2010 varied
meaningfully among Wall Street equity research analysts and that
such estimates tended to be higher in more recently published
research reports. As a result, Citi considered for each of the
selected comparable companies (i) Wall Street Consensus
Estimates and (ii) Wall Street Top Quartile Estimates.
Based on the comparable companies analysis and taking into
consideration other performance metrics and qualitative
judgments, Citi derived the following reference range of firm
value / EBITDA multiples for calendar years 2009 and
2010:
i. 4.5x to 5.5x for calendar year 2009 estimated EBITDA and
4.0x to 5.0x for calendar year 2010 estimated EBITDA, based on
Wall Street Consensus Estimates; and
ii. 3.5x to 4.5x for calendar year 2009 estimated EBITDA
and 3.0x to 4.0x for calendar year 2010 estimated EBITDA, based
on Wall Street Top Quartile Estimates.
Citi then applied these multiples to Cliffs estimated
EBITDA for calendar years 2009 and 2010 under the three
alternative scenarios described above. This analysis indicated
the following implied per share equity reference ranges for
Cliffs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
|
|
Equity Reference
|
|
|
|
Range for Cliffs
|
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Case
|
|
|
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Estimates
|
|
$
|
70.00 $ 85.00
|
|
Wall Street Top Quartile Estimates
|
|
$
|
50.00 $ 70.00
|
|
Company Case 1
|
|
|
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Estimates
|
|
$
|
100.00 $125.00
|
|
Wall Street Top Quartile Estimates
|
|
$
|
75.00 $100.00
|
|
Company Case 2
|
|
|
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Estimates
|
|
$
|
115.00 $145.00
|
|
Wall Street Top Quartile Estimates
|
|
$
|
85.00 $115.00
|
|
Citi noted the implied per share equity reference ranges
calculated above for each of the three alternative scenarios.
Citi also noted that Cliffs closing share price on
July 14, 2008 was $113.44. Citi compared the implied per
share equity reference ranges above to Cliffs closing
share price on July 14, 2008.
71
Citi selected the comparable companies used in the comparable
companies analysis because their businesses and operating
profiles are reasonably similar to those of Cliffs. However,
because of the inherent differences among the businesses,
operations and prospects of Cliffs and the businesses,
operations and prospects of the selected comparable companies,
no comparable company is exactly the same as Cliffs. Therefore,
Citi believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did
not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the comparable
companies analysis. Accordingly, Citi made qualitative judgments
concerning differences between the financial and operating
characteristics and prospects of Cliffs and the companies
included in the comparable companies analysis that would affect
the public trading values of each in order to provide a context
in which to consider the results of the quantitative analysis.
These qualitative judgments related primarily to the differing
sizes, growth prospects, geographic location of assets,
profitability levels and business segments between Cliffs and
the companies included in the comparable companies analysis and
other matters, many of which are beyond Cliffs control,
such as the impact of competition on its businesses and the
industry generally, industry growth and the absence of any
adverse material change in the financial condition and prospects
of Cliffs or the industry or in the financial markets in
general. Mathematical analysis (such as determining the average
or median) is not in itself a meaningful method of using peer
group data.
Selected
Precedent Transactions Analysis
Based upon (1) the significant projected increases in iron
ore and coal prices from calendar year 2008 through 2009, which
are generally significantly greater than the historical
increases of such prices, and (2) the significant projected
growth of EBITDA for Cliffs from fiscal year 2008 through 2009,
which is generally significantly greater than the projected
growth of EBITDA of target companies involved in recent
precedent transactions in the iron ore industry, Citi did not
consider precedent transactions based upon trailing multiples to
be a meaningful benchmark for evaluating Cliffs.
Other
Analyses
Implied
Historical Premium Analysis
Citi reviewed, for informational and illustrative purposes, the
implied premiums to be paid in the merger based on a comparison
of the historical average share prices of Alpha common stock for
various periods to the per share merger consideration,
consisting of $22.23 per share in cash and 0.95 of a share of
Cliffs common shares valued based on the historical average
share prices of Cliffs common shares for the respective periods.
Citi derived the implied premium represented relative to the
closing price of Alpha common stock on July 14, 2008 (the
last trading day prior to the execution of the merger
agreement), the average closing prices of Alpha common stock for
the 5-day,
10-day,
20-day,
30-day,
60-day, and
90-day
periods ended July 14, 2008, and with the 52-week high and
low closing prices of Alpha common stock ended July 14,
2008.
The results of this analysis are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Value of Consideration
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
July 14, 2008
|
|
$
|
98.72
|
|
|
$
|
113.44
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
x
|
|
$
|
107.77
|
|
|
$
|
22.23
|
|
|
$
|
130.00
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
5-Day Average
|
|
|
92.37
|
|
|
|
105.69
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
100.40
|
|
|
|
22.23
|
|
|
|
122.63
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
10-Day
Average
|
|
|
93.17
|
|
|
|
105.08
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
99.83
|
|
|
|
22.23
|
|
|
|
122.06
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
20-Day
Average
|
|
|
94.53
|
|
|
|
106.39
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
101.07
|
|
|
|
22.23
|
|
|
|
123.30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
30-Day
Average
|
|
|
92.21
|
|
|
|
105.23
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
99.97
|
|
|
|
22.23
|
|
|
|
122.20
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
60-Day
Average
|
|
|
76.59
|
|
|
|
97.21
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
92.35
|
|
|
|
22.23
|
|
|
|
114.58
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
90-Day
Average
|
|
|
65.42
|
|
|
|
86.05
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
81.75
|
|
|
|
22.23
|
|
|
|
103.98
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
52-Week High
|
|
|
108.73
|
|
|
|
121.95
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
115.85
|
|
|
|
22.23
|
|
|
|
138.08
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
52-Week Low
|
|
|
15.92
|
|
|
|
28.20
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
26.79
|
|
|
|
22.23
|
|
|
|
49.02
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
72
Relative
Financial Contribution Analysis
Citi reviewed, for informational and illustrative purposes, the
relative financial contributions of Alpha and Cliffs to the
combined estimated fiscal year 2008, 2009 and 2010 EBITDA and
net income, excluding synergies and transaction adjustments,
under the following three alternative scenarios: (1) Wall
Street Consensus Case for each of Alpha and Cliffs, as described
above, (2) Company Case 1 for each of Alpha and Cliffs, as
described above, and (3) Company Case 2 for each of Alpha
and Cliffs, as described above.
The results of this analysis are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Contribution
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
Alpha
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Case
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
2008E
|
|
68%
|
|
32%
|
2009E
|
|
59
|
|
41
|
2010E
|
|
55
|
|
45
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
2008E
|
|
73%
|
|
27%
|
2009E
|
|
62
|
|
38
|
2010E
|
|
56
|
|
44
|
Company Case 1
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
2008E
|
|
69%
|
|
31%
|
2009E
|
|
62
|
|
38
|
2010E
|
|
68
|
|
32
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
2008E
|
|
73%
|
|
27%
|
2009E
|
|
64
|
|
36
|
2010E
|
|
70
|
|
30
|
Company Case 2
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
2008E
|
|
69%
|
|
31%
|
2009E
|
|
59
|
|
41
|
2010E
|
|
61
|
|
39
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
2008E
|
|
73%
|
|
27%
|
2009E
|
|
61
|
|
39
|
2010E
|
|
62
|
|
38
|
Pro Forma
Accretion/Dilution Analysis
Citi reviewed, for informational and illustrative purposes,
potential accretion/dilution of cash flow per share (or
CFPS) and earnings per share (or EPS) of
Cliffs pro forma for the transaction under the following three
alternative scenarios: (1) Wall Street Consensus Case for
each of Alpha and Cliffs, as described above, (2) Company
Case 1 for each of Alpha and Cliffs, as described above, and
(3) Company Case 2 for each of Alpha and Cliffs, as
described above. Citi based these calculations on, among other
factors, an assumed transaction closing date of
December 31, 2008, preliminary purchase accounting
assumptions (applicable only to EPS) that were provided to Citi
by Alpha management and the assumption of no synergies.
73
The results of this analysis are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion / (Dilution)
|
|
|
|
to Cliffs
|
|
|
|
CFPS
|
|
|
EPS
|
|
|
Wall Street Consensus Case
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
2010E
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
Company Case 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
2010E
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(26
|
)%
|
Company Case 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
2010E
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(13
|
%)
|
Citis advisory services and opinion were provided for
the information of the Alpha board of directors in its
evaluation of the merger and did not constitute a recommendation
of the merger to Alpha or a recommendation to any holder of
Alpha common stock as to how that stockholder should vote or act
on any matters relating to the merger.
The preceding discussion is a summary of the material financial
analyses furnished by Citi to the Alpha board of directors, but
it does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses
performed by Citi or of its presentations to the Alpha board of
directors. The preparation of financial analyses and fairness
opinions is a complex process involving subjective judgments and
is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. Citi made no attempt to assign specific weights to
particular analyses or factors considered, but rather made
qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of
all the analyses and factors considered and determined to give
its fairness opinion as described above. Accordingly, Citi
believes that its analyses, and the summary set forth above,
must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the
analyses and of the factors considered by Citi, without
considering all of the analyses and factors, could create a
misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying the
analyses conducted by Citi and its opinion.
In its analyses, Citi made numerous assumptions with respect to
Alpha, industry performance, general business, economic, market
and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are
beyond the control of Alpha. Any estimates contained in
Citis analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual
values or predictive of future results or values, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by
these analyses. Estimates of values of companies do not purport
to be appraisals or necessarily to reflect the prices at which
companies may actually be sold. Because these estimates are
inherently subject to uncertainty, none of Alpha, the Alpha
board of directors, Citi or any other person assumes
responsibility if future results or actual values differ
materially from the estimates.
Citis analyses were prepared solely as part of Citis
analysis of the fairness of the merger consideration in the
merger and were provided to the Alpha board of directors in that
connection. The opinion of Citi was only one of the factors
taken into consideration by the Alpha board of directors in
making its determination to approve the merger agreement and the
merger. See Alphas Reasons for the
Merger and Recommendation of Alphas Board of
Directors beginning on page 59.
Citi is an internationally recognized investment banking firm
engaged in, among other things, the valuation of businesses and
their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
restructurings, leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings,
competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for
estate, corporate and other purposes. Alpha selected Citi to act
as its financial advisor on the basis of Citis
international reputation and Citis familiarity with Alpha.
Citi and its affiliates may in the future provide services to
Alpha and Cliffs unrelated to the proposed merger, for which
services Citi and such affiliates would expect to receive
compensation. In the ordinary course of business, Citi and its
affiliates may actively trade or hold the securities of Alpha
and Cliffs for their own account or for the account of their
customers
74
and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position
in such securities. Citi and its affiliates (including Citigroup
Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain relationships with Alpha,
Cliffs and their respective affiliates.
Pursuant to Citis engagement letter with Alpha, Alpha
agreed to pay Citi the following fees for its services rendered
in connection with the merger: (i) $1,500,000 payable
promptly upon delivery by Citi of the written fairness opinion
in connection with this transaction plus (ii) a transaction
fee equal to 0.550% of the aggregate value of the transaction
less the $1,500,000 paid under (i) above, payable promptly
upon consummation of the transaction. In the event the merger is
terminated, Alpha has agreed to pay Citi 25% (not to exceed 50%
of the transaction fee and not to be paid if a transaction fee
was previously paid) of (A) any termination,
break-up,
topping, or similar fee or payment received in connection with
the merger agreement and (B) any profit arising from shares
of Cliffs or any of its affiliates acquired by Alpha in
connection with the merger, if any, payable promptly upon
receipt of any such compensation by Alpha. Alpha has also agreed
to reimburse Citi for its reasonable and documented travel and
other expenses incurred in connection with its engagement,
including reasonable fees and expenses of not more than one
outside counsel per jurisdiction, up to a maximum amount of
$100,000 (except for expenses relating to the preparation and
delivery of the opinion, which are not capped), and to indemnify
Citi against specific liabilities and expenses relating to or
arising out of its engagement, including liabilities under the
federal securities laws.
The merger consideration was determined by arms-length
negotiations between Alpha and Cliffs, in consultation with
their respective financial advisors and other representatives,
and was not established by such financial advisors or other
representatives.
Citi and its affiliates in the past have provided, and currently
provide, services to Alpha unrelated to the merger, for which
services Citi
and/or its
affiliates have received and expect compensation, including,
without limitation, (i) acting as joint book-running
manager in Alphas offerings of convertible senior notes
and common stock in April 2008, (ii) acting as dealer
manager for the tender offer and consent solicitation made by
two of Alphas subsidiaries in April 2008 with respect to
senior notes co-issued by such subsidiaries, (iii) acting
as administrative agent, joint lead arranger, joint book manager
and lender under Alphas existing credit facilities and
(iv) acting as an advisor to Alpha in considering other
strategic alternatives. Neither Citi nor its affiliates
provides, or in the past have provided, services to Cliffs.
Opinion
of Cliffs Financial Advisor
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated July 8, 2008, Cliffs
retained J.P. Morgan as its financial advisor in connection
with the proposed merger and to render an opinion to the Cliffs
board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, to Cliffs of the consideration to be paid by Cliffs in the
proposed merger.
At the meeting of the Cliffs board of directors on July 15,
2008, J.P. Morgan delivered its oral opinion to the Cliffs
board of directors (which was subsequently confirmed in writing
on the same date) that, as of such date and on the basis of and
subject to the various factors and assumptions set forth in its
opinion, the consideration to be paid by Cliffs to Alpha
stockholders in the proposed merger was fair, from a financial
point of view, to Cliffs.
The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan, which
sets forth the assumptions made, general procedures followed,
matters considered and limitations on the scope of the review
undertaken by J.P. Morgan in conducting its financial
analysis and rendering its opinion, is attached as
Annex C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and
is incorporated herein by reference. Cliffs
shareholders are urged to read the J.P. Morgan opinion
carefully and in its entirety.
The J.P. Morgan opinion is addressed to the Cliffs board
of directors, is dated July 15, 2008, is directed only to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Cliffs of the
consideration to be paid by Cliffs in the proposed merger and
does not constitute a recommendation as to how the Cliffs or the
Alpha stockholders should vote with respect to the proposed
merger or any other matter.
The following summary of the J.P. Morgan opinion is
qualified by reference to the full text of the J.P. Morgan
opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft dated July 15, 2008 of the merger
agreement;
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning Cliffs and Alpha and the industries in
which they operate;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial and operating performance of Cliffs and
Alpha with publicly available information concerning certain
other companies J.P. Morgan deemed relevant and reviewed
the current and historical market prices of Cliffs common shares
and Alpha common stock and certain publicly traded securities of
such other companies;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
prepared by management of Alpha, certain analyses of
Alphas business prepared by the management of Cliffs and
certain internal financial analyses and forecasts prepared by
the management of Cliffs relating to Cliffs business, as
well as the estimated amount and timing of cost savings and
related expenses and synergies expected to result from the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other financial studies and analyses and
considered such other information as J.P. Morgan deemed
appropriate for the purposes of its opinion.
|
J.P. Morgan also held discussions with certain members of the
management of Cliffs and Alpha with respect to certain aspects
of the merger, and the past and current business operations of
Cliffs and Alpha, the financial condition and future prospects
and operations of Cliffs and Alpha, the effects of the merger on
the financial condition and future prospects of Cliffs and
Alpha, and certain other matters J.P. Morgan believed
necessary or appropriate to its inquiry.
J.P. Morgan relied upon and assumed the accuracy and
completeness of all information that was publicly available or
was furnished to or discussed with J.P. Morgan by Cliffs
and Alpha or otherwise reviewed by or for J.P. Morgan, and
J.P. Morgan did not independently verify (nor did
J.P. Morgan assume responsibility or liability for
independently verifying) any such information or its accuracy or
completeness. J.P. Morgan did not conduct, and was not
provided, with any valuation or appraisal of any assets or
liabilities, nor did J.P. Morgan evaluate the solvency of
Cliffs or Alpha under any state or federal laws relating to
bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In relying on
financial analyses and forecasts provided to it or derived
therefrom, including the synergies referred to above,
J.P. Morgan assumed that they were reasonably prepared
based on assumptions reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments by management as to the expected future
results of operations and financial condition of Cliffs and
Alpha to which such analyses or forecasts relate.
J.P. Morgan expressed no view as to such analyses or
forecasts (including the synergies referred to above) or the
assumptions on which they were based. J.P. Morgan also
assumed that the merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement will qualify as a tax-free
reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes,
and will be consummated as described in the merger agreement and
that the definitive merger agreement would not differ in any
material respect from the draft thereof provided to
J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgan also assumed that the
representations and warranties made by Cliffs and Alpha in the
merger agreement and the related agreements are and will be true
and correct in all respects material to J.P. Morgans
analysis. J.P. Morgan is not a legal, regulatory or tax
expert and relied on the assessments made by advisors to Cliffs
with respect to such issues. J.P. Morgan further assumed
that all material governmental, regulatory or other consents and
approvals necessary for the consummation of the merger will be
obtained without any adverse effect on Cliffs or Alpha or on the
contemplated benefits of the merger.
The projections furnished to J.P. Morgan for Alpha were
prepared by the respective managements of Cliffs and Alpha in
connection with the proposed transaction. Neither Cliffs nor
Alpha publicly discloses internal management projections of the
type provided to J.P. Morgan in connection with
J.P. Morgans analysis of the merger, and such
projections were prepared in connection with the proposed
transaction and were not prepared with a view toward public
disclosure. These projections were based on numerous variables
and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and may be beyond
the control of management, including, without limitation,
factors related to general economic and competitive conditions
and prevailing interest rates. Accordingly, actual results could
vary significantly from those set forth in such projections.
The J.P. Morgan opinion is necessarily based on economic,
market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information
made available to J.P. Morgan as of, the date of the
J.P. Morgan opinion. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect the J.P. Morgan opinion,
and J.P. Morgan does not have any obligation to
76
update, revise, or reaffirm the J.P. Morgan opinion. The
J.P. Morgan opinion is limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Cliffs of the consideration to be
paid by Cliffs in the proposed merger and J.P. Morgan has
expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the merger to the
holders of any class of securities, creditors or other
constituencies of Cliffs or as to the underlying decision by
Cliffs to engage in the merger. J.P. Morgan expressed no
opinion as to the price at which Cliffs common shares or Alpha
common stock will trade at any future time.
The consideration payable to Alpha stockholders in the proposed
merger was determined through negotiation between Alpha and
Cliffs and the decision to enter into the merger agreement was
solely that of Alpha and Cliffs. The J.P. Morgan opinion
and financial analyses were only one of the many factors
considered by Cliffs in its evaluation of the proposed merger
and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the
Cliffs board of directors or management with respect to the
proposed merger or the merger consideration.
In accordance with customary investment banking practice,
J.P. Morgan employed generally accepted valuation methods
in reaching its opinion. The following is a summary of the
material financial analyses undertaken by J.P. Morgan in
connection with providing its opinion to the Cliffs board of
directors on July 15, 2008. Some of the summaries of the
financial analyses include information presented in tabular
format. To fully understand the financial analyses, the tables
should be read together with the text of each summary.
Considering the data set forth in the table without considering
the narrative description of the financial analyses, including
the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of the financial analyses.
Publicly
traded comparable company analysis
Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan compared
selected financial data of Alpha and Cliffs with similar data
for selected publicly traded companies engaged in businesses
which J.P. Morgan judged to be analogous to the respective
businesses of Alpha and Cliffs.
For Alpha, the companies selected by J.P. Morgan were:
|
|
|
|
|
Arch Coal, Inc.
|
|
|
|
CONSOL Energy Inc.
|
|
|
|
Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Massey Energy Company
|
|
|
|
Walter Industries, Inc.
|
For Cliffs, the companies selected by J.P. Morgan were
divided into four groups Diversified Mining, Base
Metals, International Iron Ore and Steel and were as
follows:
Diversified
Mining
|
|
|
|
|
Anglo American plc
|
|
|
|
BHP Billiton Group
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
|
|
Rio Tinto plc
|
|
|
|
Teck Cominco Limited
|
|
|
|
Xstrata plc
|
Base
Metals
|
|
|
|
|
Antofagasta plc
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
|
|
|
|
Southern Copper Corporation
|
77
International
Iron Ore
|
|
|
|
|
Kumba Iron Ore Limited
|
|
|
|
Mount Gibson Iron Limited
|
Steel
|
|
|
|
|
ArcelorMittal USA
|
|
|
|
United States Steel Corporation
|
These companies were selected for each of Alpha and Cliffs,
among other reasons, because the companies share similar
business and financial characteristics to Alpha and Cliffs, as
applicable. In each case, J.P. Morgan also made judgments
and assumptions concerning differences in financial and
operating characteristics of the selected companies and other
factors that could affect the public trading value of the
selected companies.
For each of the selected companies and for Alpha and Cliffs,
J.P. Morgan divided the companys firm value, based on
most recent publicly available information, at July 14,
2008 by its estimated EBITDA for the calendar year ending
December 31, 2009, the result of which is referred to as
the Firm Value/EBITDA Multiple. In addition, for
each of the selected companies and for Alpha and Cliffs,
J.P. Morgan divided the companys equity value at
July 14, 2008 by its estimated operating cash flow for the
calendar year ending December 31, 2009, the result of which
is referred to as the Equity Value/Operating Cash Flow
Multiple. The estimates of both EBITDA and operating cash
flow for the selected companies were based on publicly available
equity research estimates. With respect to Alpha and Cliffs, two
sets of estimates of EBITDA and operating cash flow were
developed one based on publicly available equity
research estimates and the other on projections provided by
Alpha and Cliffs and certain analyses of Alphas business
prepared by Cliffs management.
The following table reflects the results of the analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Value/
|
|
|
Firm Value/
|
|
Operating Cash Flow
|
|
|
EBITDA Multiple
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
2009E
|
|
Alpha Comparables
|
|
|
|
|
Range
|
|
3.8x 7.7x
|
|
6.4x 10.2x
|
Median(1)
|
|
7.0x
|
|
8.9x
|
Cliffs Comparables
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Mining range
|
|
4.6x 7.8x
|
|
6.0x 7.8x
|
Diversified Mining median
|
|
5.4x
|
|
6.4x
|
Base Metals range
|
|
4.1x 5.8x
|
|
5.5x 8.1x
|
Base Metals median
|
|
4.7x
|
|
5.8x
|
International Iron Ore range
|
|
3.0x 4.2x
|
|
3.9x 6.0x
|
International Iron Ore median
|
|
3.6x
|
|
5.0x
|
Steel range
|
|
5.1x 6.2x
|
|
6.5x 7.8x
|
Steel median
|
|
5.6x
|
|
7.2x
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Walter Industries was excluded from the median |
Based on the Firm Value/EBITDA multiple range of 5.0 to 7.0
applied to Alphas projected 2009 EBITDA, J.P. Morgan
arrived at an estimated implied valuation range for Alpha common
stock of $131 to $182 per share. Based on the Firm Value/EBITDA
multiple range of 4.5 to 5.5 applied to Cliffs projected
2009 EBITDA, J.P. Morgan arrived at an estimated implied
valuation range for Cliffs common shares of $116 to $142 per
share.
Based upon these implied per share equity values,
J.P. Morgan calculated a range of implied exchange ratios
of 0.9230 to 1.5660.
Based on the Equity Value/Operating Cash Flow Multiple range of
7.0 to 9.0 applied to Alphas projected 2009 operating cash
flow, J.P. Morgan arrived at an estimated implied valuation
range for Alpha common stock of $132 to $170 per share. Based on
the Equity Value/Operating Cash Flow Multiple range of 5.5 to
7.0 applied to Cliffs
78
projected 2009 operating cash flow, J.P. Morgan arrived at
an estimated implied valuation range for Cliffs common shares of
$107 to $136 per share.
Based upon these implied per share equity values,
J.P. Morgan calculated a range of implied exchange ratios
of 0.9720 to 1.5900.
The implied exchange ratio analysis provides a measure of the
relative value of shares of Alpha common stock and Cliffs common
shares by showing the number of Cliffs common shares having a
value equal to one share of Alpha common stock. The purpose of
this implied exchange ratio analysis is to provide a range of
illustrative exchange ratios, or a relative measure of the
relative market values of Alpha common stock to Cliffs common
shares. The resulting exchange ratios are not directly
comparable to the exchange ratio for the merger because in the
merger, Alpha stockholders will receive cash in addition to
Cliffs common shares.
In each case, J.P. Morgan compared the implied exchange
ratio to 1.1460, calculated by dividing $130.00 per share of
Alpha common stock by $113.44. $130.00 was calculated as the sum
of (a) $22.23 per share of cash and (b) the product of
0.95 multiplied by $113.44. $113.44 was the closing price of
Cliffs common shares on July 14, 2008.
Discounted
cash flow analysis
J.P. Morgan calculated ranges of implied fully diluted equity
value per share for both Alpha common stock and Cliffs common
shares by performing a discounted cash flow analysis on a
stand-alone basis (without synergies). In addition,
J.P. Morgan also calculated ranges of implied fully diluted
equity value per share for Alpha common stock with synergies.
The discounted cash flow analysis for both Alpha and Cliffs
assumed a valuation date of December 31, 2008 and was based
on, in the case of Alpha, projections provided by Alpha and
certain analyses of Alphas business prepared by the
management of Cliffs and, in the case of Cliffs, projections
provided by Cliffs. The discounted cash flow analysis for Alpha
common stock with synergies assumed pretax synergies of
$50 million in 2009 and $100 million in 2010. Costs to
achieve these synergies in 2009 were estimated to be
$50 million, based on management guidance.
A discounted cash flow analysis is a traditional method of
evaluating an asset by estimating the future cash flows of an
asset and taking into consideration the time value of money with
respect to those future cash flows by calculating the
present value of the estimated future cash flows of
the asset. Present value refers to the current value
of one or more future cash payments, or cash flows,
from an asset and is obtained by discounting those future cash
flows or amounts by a discount rate that takes into account
macro-economic assumptions, estimates of risk, the opportunity
cost of capital, expected returns and other appropriate factors.
Other financial terms utilized below are terminal
value, which refers to the value of all future cash flows
from an asset at a particular point in time, and unlevered
free cash flows, which refers to a calculation of the
future cash flows of an asset without including in such
calculation any debt servicing costs.
In arriving at the estimated equity values per share of Alpha
common stock and Cliffs common shares, J.P. Morgan
calculated terminal values as of December 31, 2018 by
applying a range of perpetual revenue growth rates of 0.0% to
1.0% and a range of discount rates of 10.0% to 12.0%. The
unlevered free cash flows from January 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2018 and the terminal value were then
discounted to present values using the range of discount rates
and added together in order to derive the unlevered enterprise
values for each of Alpha and Cliffs. The range of discount rates
used by J.P. Morgan in its analysis was estimated using
traditional investment banking methodology, including the
analysis of selected publicly traded companies engaged in
businesses that J.P. Morgan deemed relevant to Alphas
and Cliffs businesses. These publicly traded companies
were analyzed to determine the appropriate beta (an estimate of
systematic risk) and target debt/total capital ratio to use in
calculating the ranges of discount rates described above. The
companies analyzed were the same as those used in connection
with the comparable company analysis for Alpha and Cliffs
described above.
In arriving at the estimated equity values per share of Alpha
common stock and Cliffs common shares, J.P. Morgan
calculated the equity value for both Alpha and Cliffs by
increasing the unlevered enterprise values of each of Alpha and
Cliffs by the estimated value of their respective cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities as of December 31,
2008.
79
Based on the assumptions set forth above, this analysis implied
a common stock range of $131 to $156 per share without synergies
and $139 to $166 per share with synergies for Alpha. Based on
the assumptions set forth above, this analysis implied a common
stock range of $120 to $143 per share for Cliffs. Based upon
these implied per share common stock values, J.P. Morgan
calculated a range of implied exchange ratios of 0.9140 to
1.2970 without synergies and 0.9690 to 1.3810 with synergies. In
each case, J.P. Morgan compared the implied exchange ratio
to the merger exchange ratio of 1.1460, assuming a 100% stock
transaction, calculated as described above.
Relative
contribution analysis
J.P. Morgan analyzed the contribution of Alpha and Cliffs to the
pro forma combined company with respect to revenue, EBITDA and
operating cash flow for fiscal years 2009 and 2010 using
projections provided by Alpha and Cliffs and certain analyses of
Alphas business prepared by Cliffs management. The
relative contribution analysis did not take into effect the
impact of any synergies or integration costs as a result of the
proposed merger. The analysis showed that Cliffs would
contribute approximately the following percentages of revenue,
EBITDA and operating cash flow to the pro forma combined company:
Relative
contribution of Cliffs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
Operating Cash Flow
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
55%
|
|
|
|
59%
|
|
|
|
59%
|
|
2010
|
|
|
55%
|
|
|
|
60%
|
|
|
|
61%
|
|
The relative contribution percentages based on revenue, EBITDA
and operating cash flow were used to determine the implied pro
forma ownership percentages of the combined company post-merger
for the Cliffs shareholders and Alpha stockholders assuming a
100% stock transaction. This was done by first assuming that
Alphas and Cliffs contributions with respect to
revenue, EBITDA and operating cash flow reflected each
companys contribution to the combined companys pro
forma firm value (defined as the sum of market capitalization,
net debt and minority interests). J.P. Morgan then derived
each companys equity value contribution with respect to
revenue, EBITDA and operating cash flow by adjusting each
companys firm value contribution determined for each
measurement by its outstanding net debt and minority interests.
The analysis yielded the following implied pro forma ownership
by the Cliffs shareholders:
Implied
ownership by Cliffs
shareholders(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
Operating Cash Flow
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
53%
|
|
|
|
58%
|
|
|
|
59%
|
|
2010
|
|
|
54%
|
|
|
|
59%
|
|
|
|
61%
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on relative contribution, actual capital structure and
assuming a 100% stock transaction |
Based on the implied pro forma ownership percentages with
respect to revenue, EBITDA and operating cash flow,
J.P. Morgan then calculated the implied relative exchange
ratios for each measurement assuming a 100% stock transaction.
The analysis yielded the following implied exchange ratios:
Implied
exchange ratio(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
Operating Cash Flow
|
|
2009
|
|
1.2534x
|
|
1.0569x
|
|
1.0003x
|
2010
|
|
1.2321x
|
|
0.9969x
|
|
0.9227x
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on relative contribution, actual capital structure and
assuming a 100% stock transaction |
J.P. Morgan then compared the exchange ratios implied by the
contribution analysis as calculated as described above to the
merger exchange ratio of 1.1460, assuming a 100% stock
transaction, which implies pro forma ownership of approximately
56% for Cliffs shareholders and approximately 44% for Alpha
stockholders.
80
Value
creation analysis
J.P. Morgan also estimated the potential impact on the value of
the common shares held by Cliffs shareholders due to the
transaction. J.P. Morgan calculated the potential
increase/(decrease) in the equity value per Cliffs common share
by comparing (a) the estimated discounted cash flow
valuations of Cliffs common shares with (b) the estimated
value of the pro forma Alpha common stock calculated by adding
(i) the estimated discounted cash flow valuation for Cliffs
common shares, (ii) the estimated discounted cash flow
valuation for Alpha common stock and (iii) the estimated
discounted cash flow valuation for the estimated synergies (less
estimated integration costs), multiplied by a factor of 60%,
representing Cliffs shareholders pro forma ownership of
the pro forma combined company. Based on the assumptions set
forth above, this analysis implied value creation for Cliffs
common shares of $1.85 per share (assuming no discount rate
improvement) and $7.34 per share (assuming a 0.5% discount rate
improvement).
Miscellaneous
The foregoing summary of certain material financial analyses
does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or
data presented by J.P. Morgan. The preparation of a
fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily
susceptible to partial analysis or summary description.
J.P. Morgan believes that the foregoing summary and its
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of the foregoing summary and these analyses, without
considering all of its analyses as a whole, could create an
incomplete view of the processes underlying the analyses and its
opinion. In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan did not
attribute any particular weight to any analyses or factors
considered by it and did not form an opinion as to whether any
individual analysis or factor (positive or negative), considered
in isolation, supported or failed to support its opinion.
Rather, J.P. Morgan considered the totality of the factors
and analyses performed in determining its opinion. Analyses
based upon forecasts of future results are inherently uncertain,
as they are subject to numerous factors or events beyond the
control of the parties and their advisors. Accordingly,
forecasts and analyses used or made by J.P. Morgan are not
necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than suggested by those
analyses. Moreover, J.P. Morgans analyses are not and
do not purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the
prices at which businesses actually could be bought or sold.
None of the selected companies reviewed as described in the
above summary is identical to Alpha or Cliffs. However, the
companies selected were chosen because they are publicly traded
companies with operations and businesses that, for purposes of
J.P. Morgans analysis, may be considered similar to
those of Alpha or Cliffs, as the case may be. The analyses
necessarily involve complex considerations and judgments
concerning differences in financial and operational
characteristics of the companies involved and other factors that
could affect the companies compared to Alpha or Cliffs.
As a part of its investment banking business, J.P. Morgan
and its affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for
estate, corporate and other purposes. J.P. Morgan was
selected to advise Cliffs with respect to the merger and to
deliver an opinion to the Cliffs board of directors with respect
to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
consideration to be paid by Cliffs in the merger on the basis of
such experience and its familiarity with Cliffs.
J.P. Morgan acted as financial advisor to Cliffs with respect to
the proposed merger and will receive a fee from Cliffs for its
services (including for delivery of the J.P. Morgan
opinion) in an aggregate amount equal to $15 million, a
substantial portion of which will become payable only if the
proposed merger is consummated. In the event Alpha pays any
termination fee or other payment (including any reimbursement of
expenses) to Cliffs following or in connection with the
termination, abandonment or failure to consummate the merger,
Cliffs has agreed to pay J.P. Morgan 25% of any such
termination fee or other payment (not to exceed the amount that
would otherwise be payable to J.P. Morgan), less any fees
previously paid. In addition, Cliffs has agreed to reimburse
J.P. Morgan for its expenses and indemnify J.P. Morgan
against certain liabilities arising out of
J.P. Morgans engagement, including liabilities
arising under the Federal securities laws.
81
In addition, during the past two years, J.P. Morgan and its
affiliates have had commercial or investment banking
relationships with Cliffs for which J.P. Morgan and its
affiliates have received customary compensation.
In addition, J.P. Morgans commercial banking
affiliate is an agent bank and a lender under outstanding credit
facilities of Cliffs, for which it receives customary
compensation or other financial benefits. J.P. Morgan
anticipates that J.P. Morgan and its affiliates will
arrange and provide financing to Cliffs in connection with the
merger for customary compensation. J.P. Morgan has no
transaction history with Alpha. In the ordinary course of their
businesses, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates may actively
trade the debt and equity securities of Cliffs or Alpha for
their own accounts or for the accounts of customers and,
accordingly, they may at any time hold long or short positions
in such securities.
Stock
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers of Alpha and
Cliffs
Alpha
You should review Alphas disclosures about Alpha
directors and executive officers ownership of Alpha
securities that are incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 239.
Cliffs
For information regarding Cliffs directors and executive
officers ownership of Cliffs securities, please see
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management Cliffs Share Ownership by
Management and Directors beginning on page 177.
Merger
Consideration
Holders of Alpha common stock (other than shares held by any
dissenting Alpha stockholder that has properly exercised
appraisal rights in accordance with Delaware law, held in
treasury by Alpha or owned by Cliffs) will be entitled to
receive for each share of Alpha common stock (which will be
cancelled in the merger):
|
|
|
|
|
$22.23 in cash, without interest; and
|
|
|
|
0.95 of a fully paid, nonassessable common share of Cliffs.
|
As a result, Cliffs will issue approximately 70,000,000 of its
common shares and pay approximately $1.7 billion in cash in
the merger based upon the number of shares of Alpha common stock
outstanding on the record date of the Alpha special meeting.
The total value of the merger consideration that an Alpha
stockholder receives in the merger may vary. The value of the
cash portion of the merger consideration is fixed at $22.23 for
each share of Alpha common stock. The share portion of the
merger consideration is similarly fixed at 0.95 of a common
share of Cliffs to be exchanged for each share of Alpha common
stock, but the value of the share portion of the merger
consideration will vary due to changes in the market value of
Cliffs common shares.
No fractional common shares of Cliffs will be issued in the
merger. Any holder of Alpha common stock that would otherwise be
entitled to receive fractional common shares of Cliffs as a
result of the exchange of Alpha common stock for Cliffs common
shares will receive, in lieu of any fractional shares, an amount
in cash, without interest, equal to the fractional share
interest multiplied by the closing price for a common share of
Cliffs as reported on the NYSE Composite Transactions Reports as
of the closing date of the merger (or, if that date is not a
trading day, as of the trading day immediately preceding the
closing date).
Cliffs will fund the cash portion of the merger consideration
with cash from committed debt financing.
Ownership
of the Combined Company After the Merger
Based on the number of common shares of Cliffs and shares of
Alpha common stock outstanding on their respective record dates,
and assuming that Cliffs will issue approximately 70,000,000
common shares of Cliffs in
82
connection with the merger, after completion of the merger
former Alpha stockholders will own approximately 37% of the
then-outstanding common shares of the combined company.
Interests
of Alpha Executive Officers and Directors in the
Merger
When considering the recommendation of its board of directors
with respect to the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger,
Alpha stockholders should be aware that some directors and
executive officers of Alpha have interests in the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement that may be different from,
or in addition to, their interests as stockholders and the
interests of Alpha stockholders generally. These interests
include:
|
|
|
|
|
special retention bonuses payable upon closing;
|
|
|
|
accelerated vesting and exercisability of Alpha stock options
and restricted stock issued under Alphas equity
compensation plans;
|
|
|
|
payments under employment agreements and severance plans which,
in either case, may be triggered upon the closing of the merger
or if the officers employment is terminated under certain
circumstances following the merger;
|
|
|
|
accelerated vesting and payment of deferred compensation for
directors under Alphas equity compensation plans;
|
|
|
|
potential appointment to the Cliffs board of directors following
the merger;
|
|
|
|
potentially becoming executive officers, employees or
consultants of Cliffs after the transaction;
|
|
|
|
continued benefits under Cliffs plans for two years following
the effective date of the merger that are, in the aggregate,
substantially comparable to those provided by Alpha immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
Cliffs agreement to indemnify each present and former
Alpha officer and director against liabilities arising out of
that persons services as an officer or director, and
maintain directors and officers liability insurance
for a period of six years after closing to cover Alpha directors
and officers, subject to certain limitations.
|
The Alpha board of directors was aware of these arrangements
during its deliberations on the merits of the merger and in
deciding to recommend that you vote for the adoption of the
merger agreement at the Alpha special meeting.
John Brinzo. Alphas board considered the
interests that one director of Alpha, John Brinzo, had in Cliffs
as a result of his former role as Chief Executive Officer and
Chair of the Cliffs board of directors, including his receipt of
a pension from Cliffs and ownership of common shares and
unvested performance shares of Cliffs. As of October 6,
2008, Mr. Brinzo held 36,048 common shares of Cliffs.
Mr. Brinzo is entitled to receive monthly pension payments
from Cliffs in the amount of $9,485.94 for the rest of his life.
As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
Mr. Brinzo holds 23,188 performance shares and 4,092
retention units of Cliffs.
Change in Control. For purposes of all the
Alpha agreements and plans described in further detail below,
the completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will constitute a change in control.
Retention Bonus. In connection with entry into
the merger agreement, Alpha approved the grant of a cash
retention bonus to five executive officers including named
executive officers David C. Stuebe, Randy L. McMillion, and
Joachim V. Porco. Messrs. Stuebe, McMillion, and Porco, and
two other executive officers (together) will receive cash
retention bonuses at the closing of the merger in the amounts of
up to $1.2 million, $2.1 million, $1.6 million
and $1.9 million, respectively. Named executive officers
Michael J. Quillen and Kevin S. Crutchfield will not receive
retention bonuses. Each retention bonus will be forfeited in the
event that the executives employment is terminated for
cause or the executive voluntarily terminates employment without
cause prior to the second anniversary of closing of the merger.
Equity Compensation Awards. The merger
agreement provides that, upon completion of the merger,
outstanding Alpha stock options are converted into Cliffs stock
options, and outstanding Alpha restricted shares
83
are converted into the right to receive the merger
consideration. Also, each outstanding performance share vests
according to the terms of its agreement, and the holders of
performance shares are entitled to receive cash for the shares.
The terms of Alphas equity compensation plans and the
applicable award agreements provide that upon a change in
control of Alpha, unvested stock options and shares of
restricted stock will vest in full, and performance shares vest
and are paid out at the target award level contemporaneous with
the consummation of the change in control. Assuming a closing
date for the merger of December 31, 2008, upon completion
of the merger, (1) the number of unvested stock options
(with exercise prices ranging from $12.73 to $24.85) held by
each of Messrs. Quillen, Stuebe, Crutchfield, McMillion,
Porco, the two other Alpha executive officers (together), and
the seven non-employee directors (as a group), that would vest
are 0, 16,000, 29,162, 24,000, 15,785, 28,568, and 12,000
respectively; (2) the number of performance shares of Alpha
common stock held by each of Messrs. Quillen, Stuebe,
Crutchfield, McMillion, Porco, and the two other Alpha executive
officers (together) and the seven non-employee directors (as a
group) that would vest and become free of restrictions are
144,811, 26,945, 88,270, 42,631, 34,274, 41,616, and 0,
respectively; and (3) the number of shares of restricted
Alpha common stock held by each of Messrs. Quillen, Stuebe,
Crutchfield, McMillion, Porco, the two other Alpha executive
officers (together), and the seven non-employee directors (as a
group), that would vest and become free of restrictions are
111,579, 18,896, 67,755, 32,715, 26,398, 32,069 and 40,660
respectively.
Assuming the merger is completed on December 31, 2008, the
aggregate cash value of the stock-based awards held by
Messrs. Quillen, Stuebe, Crutchfield, McMillion, Porco, the
two other Alpha executive officers (together) and the seven
non-employee directors (as a group) that would vest upon
completion of the merger, based on an estimated Alpha closing
stock price of $128.12, is approximately $32.8 million,
$7.9 million, $23.3 million, $12.6 million,
$9.8 million, $13.0 million, and $6.7 million,
respectively.
Prior to the effective date of the merger, Alphas board of
directors (and/or its compensation committee) expects to vote to
exempt its executive officers and directors
dispositions of Alpha securities (including derivative
securities) from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.
Employment Agreements. Alpha has previously
entered into employment agreements with each of Michael J.
Quillen and Kevin S. Crutchfield. These employment agreements
with Messrs. Quillen and Crutchfield provide for certain
payments to them upon a change in control and upon termination
of employment in connection with a change in control.
On July 16, 2008 Alpha announced that after the merger,
Mr. Quillen will move to a new position as non-executive
vice chairman of the board of the combined company, where he
will help guide Clifs Natural Resources strategic
direction and growth. Mr. Quillens position of
chairman of Alphas board and chief executive officer of
Alpha will be eliminated. His termination of employment as chief
executive officer will be treated as a termination without cause
subsequent to a change in control, and he will be eligible to
receive payments and benefits under his employment agreement as
set forth below.
Under the terms of the employment agreements with
Messrs. Quillen and Crutchfield, upon a change in control,
each of Messrs. Quillen and Crutchfield is entitled to
receive a lump-sum cash payment equal to his pro-rata target
annual bonus for the year in which the change in control occurs.
Assuming the merger is completed on December 31, 2008, the
amount of such payments that would be payable to each of
Messrs. Quillen and Crutchfield is $700,000 and $504,000,
respectively.
If the employment of either Mr. Quillen or
Mr. Crutchfield is terminated during the 90 days prior
to, on, or within one year after a change in control by either
of them for good reason or by the employer other than for
(x) employer cause, (y) death or
(z) permanent disability, as such terms are
defined in the employment agreements with Messrs. Quillen
and Crutchfield, each of them will be entitled, subject to his
execution of a release, to (i) a lump sum payment equal to
a multiple of his base salary and target bonus (three, in the
case of Mr. Quillen, and two and one-half, in the case of
Mr. Crutchfield, whereas absent a change in control, for
each of Messrs. Quillen and Crutchfield the multiple would
be two), and (iii) a cash payment of $15,000 to cover
outplacement assistance services and other expenses associated
with seeking another position.
In addition, upon a termination of Mr. Quillens or
Mr. Crutchfields employment without cause or for good
reason, whether or not in connection with a change in control,
each is entitled to (i) a pro-rata share of any individual
84
annual cash bonuses or target individual annual cash incentive
compensation; (ii) any accrued base salary and other
amounts accrued
and/or owing
to such executive; and (iii) certain health, life and
welfare benefits until the earlier to occur of (x) his
reaching the age of 65, (y) his obtaining substantially
similar benefits from another employer, or (z) in the case
of Mr. Quillen, the
36-month
anniversary of the employment termination date in connection
with a change in control (whereas absent a change in control, it
would be the
24-month
anniversary), and in the case of Mr. Crutchfield, the
expiration of the COBRA continuation period (generally
18 months). Assuming that the merger is completed on
December 31, 2008 and Mr. Quillen and
Mr. Crutchfield experience qualifying terminations of
employment immediately thereafter, the value of the continued
medical and life benefits to be provided is approximately
$69,000 and $27,000, respectively.
In the event that any change in control payments or
distributions to Messrs. Quillen or Crutchfield would
constitute an excess parachute payment within the
meaning of Section 280G of the Code, then the agreements
obligate Alpha (subject to certain exceptions) to pay each
executive an additional tax
gross-up
payment such that the net amount retained by him, after
deduction of any excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of
the Code and any taxes imposed upon the
gross-up
payment itself, is equal to the amount that would have been
payable or distributable to him if such payments or
distributions did not constitute excess parachute payments.
Under the terms of their employment agreements,
Messrs. Quillen and Crutchfield have also agreed to certain
ongoing confidentiality obligations, and non-competition and
non-solicitation obligations for a period of one year following
termination of employment.
Assuming that the merger is completed on December 31, 2008
and each of Messrs. Quillen and Crutchfield experiences a
qualifying termination of employment immediately thereafter, the
aggregate value of the cash severance and other benefits that
would be payable is approximately $18.0 million and
$11.5 million, respectively, not including the value of the
vesting of equity awards described above. Solely upon a change
in control, assuming that the merger is completed on
December 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the cash payments
that would be made to Mr. Crutchfield under his employment
agreement is approximately $6.8 million, not including the
value of the equity awards described above.
Key Employee Separation Plan. Alphas
five other executive officers, including Messrs. Stuebe,
McMillion, and Porco, are not parties to employment agreements
with Alpha, but are covered by Alphas key employee
separation plan, which was previously approved by Alpha. Under
the terms of the separation plan, upon a change in control, each
participant is entitled to receive a lump-sum cash payment equal
to his pro-rata target annual bonus for the year in which the
change in control occurs. Assuming the merger is completed on
December 31, 2008, the amount of such payments payable to
each of Messrs. Stuebe, McMillion, and Porco and the two
other executive officers (together), respectively, is
approximately $236,000, $262,500, $214,988, and $252,000.
Contingent upon the participants execution of a general
release, and a one-year non-disparagement and non-competition
agreement, in the event the participants employment is
terminated by the employer without cause or by the participant
for good reason during the 90 days prior to, on or within
one year after a change in control, upon termination the
participant will be entitled to receive his base salary and
target bonus multiplied by the applicable benefit factor (in the
case of each of Messrs. Stuebe, McMillion, and Porco, that
factor is two, whereas absent a change in control, it would be
one and one-half).
In addition, upon a termination of a participants
employment without cause or for good reason (whether or not in
connection with a change in control), each participant is
entitled to: (i) any accrued base salary and other amounts
accrued
and/or owing
to such executive; (ii) a pro-rata share of any individual
annual cash bonuses or target individual annual cash incentive
compensation; (iii) certain medical and life benefits until
the earlier to occur of (x) reaching the age of 65,
(y) obtaining substantially similar benefits from another
employer, or (z) the expiration of the COBRA continuation
period, and (iv) a cash payment of $15,000 to cover
outplacement assistance services and other expenses associated
with seeking another position. Assuming that the merger is
completed on December 31, 2008 and the executive
experiences a qualifying termination of employment immediately
thereafter, the approximate value of continued health, life and
welfare benefits to each of Messrs. Stuebe, McMillion, and
Porco and the two other executive officers (together), is
approximately $19,000, $26,000, $23,000, and $40,000,
respectively.
85
Assuming that the merger is completed on December 31, 2008
and the executive experiences a qualifying termination of
employment immediately thereafter, the approximate aggregate
value of the cash severance and other severance benefits payable
under the Separation Plan to each of Messrs. Stuebe,
McMillion, and Porco and each of Alphas two other
executive officers (together) is approximately
$1.59 million, $1.79 million, $1.47 million, and
$2.31 million, respectively. These amounts are in addition
to the retention bonuses and the value of the vesting of equity
awards, described above.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation. Alpha
maintains the Director Deferred Compensation Agreement under the
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which provides for the deferral
of compensation of non-employee directors into cash and stock
units.
Pursuant to the terms of the Director Deferred Compensation
Agreement, participants are entitled to a lump sum distribution
of their accounts within 30 days following the consummation
of a change in control. Three directors participate in this plan.
Appointment to the Cliffs Board of Directors and Officer
Appointment. Under the merger agreement, the
Cliffs board of directors is required to take all actions as may
be required to appoint Mr. Quillen, Alphas current
Chief Executive Officer, to serve as non-executive
vice-chairman, and Glenn A. Eisenberg, another current Alpha
board member, to serve on the Cliffs board of directors after
the merger. Under the merger agreement, Cliffs has agreed to
take all actions as may be required to appoint
Mr. Crutchfield as president of the coal division of Cliffs
as of the effective time of the merger.
New Employment Arrangements. As of the date
Alpha entered into the merger agreement, no executive officer of
Alpha had any arrangement or understanding with Cliffs regarding
continued employment with Cliffs or the combined company other
than, as discussed above, the payment of retention bonuses to
certain executives and the provisions of the merger agreement
that obligate Cliffs to appoint certain directors to the board
of Cliffs and to appoint Mr. Crutchfield as president of
the coal division of Cliffs at the effective time of the merger.
As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, no
executive officer of Alpha has entered into any agreement or
understanding or engaged in any substantive discussions with
Cliffs as to terms and conditions of possible employment with
Cliffs or the combined company. Alpha anticipates that,
subsequent to the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
Mr. Crutchfield is likely to engage in discussions with
Cliffs regarding the terms and conditions of his future
employment by Cliffs as president of the coal division of Cliffs
pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement. It is possible
that certain other members of Alphas management will be
presented with, and will discuss with Cliffs, proposed terms of
future employment with the combined company subsequent to the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The proposed
terms and conditions of such possible employment that may be
discussed and agreed upon by Mr. Crutchfield and other
members of Alphas management and Cliffs may include, but
are not necessarily limited to, base salary, short-term
incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation,
including equity awards.
Listing
of Cliffs Common Shares and Delisting of Alpha Common
Stock
It is a condition to the merger that the Cliffs common shares
issuable in connection with the merger be authorized for
issuance on the NYSE subject to official notice of issuance.
Cliffs common shares are currently traded on the NYSE under the
symbol CLF. If the merger is completed, Alpha common
stock will no longer be listed on the NYSE and will be
deregistered under the Exchange Act, and Alpha may no longer
file periodic reports with the SEC.
Cliffs
Board of Directors After the Merger
Under the merger agreement, as of the effective time of the
merger, the Cliffs board of directors will take all actions as
may be required to appoint Michael J. Quillen (to serve as
non-executive vice-chairman) and Glenn A. Eisenberg to the
Cliffs board of directors. Cliffs and Alpha have agreed
that at least one of the individuals to be appointed to the
Cliffs board of directors will meet the independence standard of
the listing standards of the NYSE. If either of these
individuals declines or is unable to serve on the Cliffs board
of directors, Cliffs and Alpha will agree on a mutually
acceptable candidate.
86
Michael J. Quillen has served as Alphas Chief Executive
Officer and a member of the Alpha board since its formation in
November 2004 and served as Alphas President until January
2007. He was named Chairman of Alphas board in October
2006. Mr. Quillen joined the Alpha management team as
President and the sole manager of Alpha Natural Resources, LLC,
Alphas top-tier operating subsidiary, in August 2002, and
has served as Chief Executive Officer of Alpha Natural
Resources, LLC since January 2003. He also served as the
president and a member of the board of directors of ANR
Holdings, LLC, Alphas former top-tier holding company,
from December 2002 until ANR Holdings, LLC was merged with
another of Alphas subsidiaries in December 2005, and as
the chief executive officer of ANR Holdings, LLC from March 2003
until December 2005. From September 1998 to December 2002,
Mr. Quillen was Executive Vice President
Operations of AMCI Metals & Coal
International Inc., which is referred to as AMCI. While at AMCI,
he was also responsible for the development of AMCIs
Australian properties. Mr. Quillen has over 30 years
of experience in the coal industry starting as an engineer. He
has held senior executive positions in the coal industry
throughout his career, including as Vice President
Operations of Pittston Coal Company, President of Pittston Coal
Sales Corp., Vice President of AMVEST Corporation, Vice
President Operations of NERCO Coal Corporation,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Addington, Inc. and
Manager of Mid-Vol Leasing, Inc. Mr. Quillen was elected to
the board of directors of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., a
leading producer of construction aggregates in the United
States, in February 2008.
Glenn A. Eisenberg has been a member of the Alpha board since
the 2005 Alpha annual meeting and is currently Chairman of
Alphas Audit Committee and a member of Alphas
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Mr. Eisenberg currently serves as Executive Vice President,
Finance and Administration of The Timken Company, an
international manufacturer of highly engineered bearings, alloy
and specialty steel and components and a provider of related
products and services. Prior to joining The Timken Company in
2002, Mr. Eisenberg served as President and Chief Operating
Officer of United Dominion Industries, a manufacturer of
proprietary engineered products, from 1999 to 2001, and as the
President Test Instrumentation Segment and Executive
Vice President for United Dominion Industries from 1998 to 1999.
Mr. Eisenberg also serves as a director and chairman of the
audit committee of Family Dollar Stores, Inc., owners and
operators of discount stores throughout the United States.
Appraisal
Rights of Alpha Stockholders
Holders of record of Alpha common stock who do not vote in favor
of the adoption of the merger agreement, and who otherwise
comply with the applicable provisions of Section 262 of the
DGCL, will be entitled to exercise appraisal rights under
Section 262 of the DGCL in connection with the merger. A
person having a beneficial interest in shares of Alpha common
stock held of record in the name of another person, such as a
broker, bank or other nominee, must act promptly to cause the
record holder to fulfill the requirements of Section 262 of
the DGCL properly and in a timely manner to perfect appraisal
rights.
The following discussion is not a complete statement of the
law pertaining to appraisal rights under the DGCL and is
qualified by the full text of Section 262 of the DGCL,
which is reprinted in its entirety as Annex D and
incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by
reference. All references in Section 262 of the DGCL and in
this summary to a stockholder or holder
are to the record holder of the shares of Alpha common stock as
to which appraisal rights are asserted. The following summary
does not constitute legal or other advice nor does it constitute
a recommendation that stockholders exercise their appraisal
rights under Section 262 of the DGCL.
Holders of shares of Alpha common stock who do not vote in favor
of the adoption of the merger agreement and who otherwise follow
the procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL will be
entitled to have their Alpha common stock appraised by the
Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive, in lieu of the merger
consideration, payment in cash of the fair value of
the shares of Alpha common stock, exclusive of any element of
value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the
merger, as determined by the Court together with interest, if
any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be fair value.
Unless the Delaware court in its discretion determines otherwise
for good cause shown, this rate of interest will be five percent
over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge)
as established from time to time between the effective date of
the merger and the date of payment and will be compounded
quarterly. Any such judicial determination of the fair value of
shares of Alpha common stock could be based upon considerations
other than or in addition to the merger consideration and the
87
market value of the shares of Alpha common stock. Moreover,
Alpha may argue in an appraisal proceeding that, for purposes of
such a proceeding, the fair value of the shares of Alpha common
stock is less than the merger consideration. You should be
aware that the fair value of your shares as determined under
Section 262 of the DGCL could be less than, the same as, or
more than the merger consideration that you are entitled to
receive under the terms of the merger agreement.
Under Section 262 of the DGCL, when a proposed merger of a
Delaware corporation is to be submitted for adoption at a
meeting of its stockholders, the corporation, not less than
20 days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its
stockholders who was a stockholder on the record date for this
meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal rights are
available, that appraisal rights are so available, and must
include in that required notice a copy of Section 262 of
the DGCL.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus constitutes the required
notice to the holders of the shares of Alpha common stock in
respect of the merger, and Section 262 of the DGCL is
attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex D. Any Alpha stockholder who wishes to
exercise appraisal rights in connection with the merger or who
wishes to preserve the right to do so should review the
following discussion and Annex D carefully, because
failure to timely and properly comply with the procedures
specified in Annex D will result in the loss of
appraisal rights under the DGCL. Moreover, because of the
complexity of the procedures for exercising the right to seek
appraisal of shares of Alpha common stock, stockholders who are
considering exercising such rights should seek the advice of
legal counsel.
A holder of Alpha common stock wishing to exercise appraisal
rights must not vote in favor of the adoption of the merger
agreement, and must deliver to Alpha before the taking of the
vote on the adoption of the merger agreement at the Alpha
special meeting a written demand for appraisal of the
stockholders Alpha common stock. This written demand for
appraisal must be separate from any proxy or ballot abstaining
from the vote on the adoption of the merger agreement or
instructing or effecting a vote against the adoption of the
merger agreement. This demand must reasonably inform Alpha of
the identity of the stockholder and of the stockholders
intent thereby to demand appraisal of the stockholders
shares in connection with the merger. A holder of Alpha common
stock wishing to exercise appraisal rights must be the record
holder of the shares of Alpha common stock on the date the
written demand for appraisal is made and must continue to hold
the shares of Alpha common stock through the effective date of
the merger. Accordingly, a holder of Alpha common stock who is
the record holder of Alpha common stock on the date the written
demand for appraisal is made, but who thereafter transfers the
shares of Alpha common stock prior to consummation of the
merger, will lose any right to appraisal in respect of the
shares of Alpha common stock.
A proxy that is signed and does not contain voting instructions
will, unless revoked, be voted in favor of the adoption of the
merger agreement, and it will constitute a waiver of the
stockholders right of appraisal and will nullify any
previously delivered written demand for appraisal. Therefore, a
stockholder who submits a proxy and who wishes to exercise
appraisal rights must vote against adoption of the merger
agreement, or abstain from voting on the adoption of the merger
agreement.
Only a holder of record of Alpha common stock on the date of the
making of a demand for appraisal will be entitled to assert
appraisal rights for the shares of Alpha common stock registered
in that holders name. A demand for appraisal should be
executed by or on behalf of the holder of record, fully and
correctly, as the holders name appears on the
holders stock certificates. The demand must reasonably
inform Alpha of the identity of the holder and the intention of
the holder to demand appraisal of his, her or its shares of
Alpha common stock. If your shares of Alpha common stock are
held through a broker, bank, nominee or other third party, and
you wish to demand appraisal rights, you must act promptly to
instruct the applicable broker, bank, nominee or other third
party to follow the steps summarized in this section.
All written demands for appraisal should be sent or delivered
to Alpha at One Alpha Place, P.O. Box 2345,
Abingdon, Virginia 24212, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
Within ten days after the effective date of the merger, Alpha,
or its successor, which we refer to generally as the surviving
corporation, will notify each former Alpha stockholder who has
properly asserted appraisal rights under Section 262 of the
DGCL, and has not voted in favor of the adoption of the merger
agreement, of the date the merger
88
became effective. At any time within 60 days after the
effective date of the merger, any holder who has demanded an
appraisal has the right to withdraw the demand and accept the
merger consideration in accordance with the merger agreement for
his, her or its shares of Alpha common stock.
Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger, but
not thereafter, the surviving corporation or any former Alpha
stockholder who has complied with the statutory requirements
summarized above may file a petition in the Delaware Court of
Chancery, with a copy served on the surviving corporation in the
case of a petition filed by the stockholder, demanding a
determination of the fair value of the shares of Alpha common
stock that are entitled to appraisal rights. None of Cliffs, the
surviving corporation or Alpha is under any obligation to and
none of them has any present intention to file a petition with
respect to the appraisal of the fair value of the shares of
Alpha common stock, and stockholders seeking to exercise
appraisal rights should not assume that the surviving
corporation, Alpha or Cliffs will initiate any negotiations with
respect to the fair value of such shares. Accordingly, it is the
obligation of Alpha stockholders wishing to assert appraisal
rights to take all necessary action to perfect and maintain
their appraisal rights within the time prescribed in
Section 262 of the DGCL. A person who is a beneficial owner
of shares of Alpha common stock held either in a voting trust or
by a nominee on behalf of such person may, in such persons
own name, file the petition described in this paragraph.
Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger, any
former Alpha stockholder who has complied with the requirements
for exercise of appraisal rights will be entitled, upon written
request, to receive from the surviving corporation a statement
setting forth the aggregate number of shares of Alpha common
stock not voted in favor of adopting the merger agreement, and
with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received
and the aggregate number of former holders of these shares of
Alpha common stock. These statements must be mailed within
10 days after a written request therefor has been received
by the surviving corporation or within 10 days after
expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal
under Section 262 of the DGCL, whichever is later. A person
who is the beneficial owner of shares of Alpha common stock held
either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of any such
person may, in such persons own name, request from the
surviving corporation the statement described this paragraph.
If a petition for an appraisal is filed timely with the Delaware
Court of Chancery by a former Alpha stockholder and a copy
thereof is served upon the surviving corporation, the surviving
corporation will then be obligated within 20 days of
service to file with the Delaware Register in Chancery a duly
verified list containing the names and addresses of all former
Alpha stockholders who have demanded appraisal of their shares
of Alpha common stock and with whom agreements as to value have
not been reached. After notice to such former Alpha stockholders
as required by the Delaware Court of Chancery, the Delaware
Court of Chancery shall conduct a hearing on such petition to
determine those former Alpha stockholders who have complied with
Section 262 of the DGCL and who have become entitled to
appraisal rights thereunder. The Delaware Court of Chancery may
require the former Alpha stockholders who demanded appraisal of
their shares of Alpha common stock to submit their stock
certificates to the Delaware Register in Chancery for notation
thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceeding. If any
former stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the
Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to
that former stockholder.
After determining which, if any, former Alpha stockholders are
entitled to appraisal, the Delaware Court of Chancery will
appraise their shares of Alpha common stock, determining their
fair value, exclusive of any element of value
arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger,
together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount
determined to be the fair value. Unless the Delaware Court of
Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause
shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through
the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded
quarterly and shall accrue at five percent over the Federal
Reserve discount rate (including the surcharge) as established
from time to time between the effective date of the merger and
the date of the payment.
In determining fair value, the Delaware Court of
Chancery is required to take into account all relevant factors.
Alpha stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware
that the fair value of their shares of Alpha common stock as
determined under Section 262 of the DGCL could be less
than, the same as, or more than the value of the consideration
they would receive pursuant to the merger agreement if they did
not seek appraisal of their shares of Alpha common stock.
Cliffs, Alpha
and/or the
surviving corporation reserve the right to assert, in any
89
appraisal proceeding, that for the purposes of Section 262
of the DGCL, the fair value of a share of Alpha
common stock is less than the merger consideration.
The costs of the appraisal action may be determined by the
Delaware Court of Chancery and levied upon the parties as the
Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable. Upon application of
a former Alpha stockholder, the Delaware Court of Chancery may
also order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any
former Alpha stockholder in connection with an appraisal
proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable
attorneys fees and the fees and expenses of experts used
in the appraisal proceeding, be charged pro rata against the
value of all of the shares of Alpha common stock entitled to
appraisal.
Any holder of Alpha common stock who has duly demanded an
appraisal in compliance with Section 262 of the DGCL will
not, after the consummation of the merger, be entitled to vote
the shares of Alpha common stock subject to this demand for any
purpose or be entitled to the payment of dividends or other
distributions on those shares of Alpha common stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to holders of record of
Alpha common stock as of a record date prior to the effective
date of the merger).
If any stockholder who properly demands appraisal of his, her or
its Alpha common stock under Section 262 of the DGCL fails
to perfect, or effectively withdraws or loses, his, her or its
right to appraisal, as provided in Section 262 of the DGCL,
that stockholders shares of Alpha common stock will be
deemed to have been converted into the right to receive the
merger consideration payable (without interest) in the merger.
An Alpha stockholder will fail to perfect, or effectively lose
or withdraw, his, her or its right to appraisal if, among other
things, no petition for appraisal is filed within 120 days
after the effective date of the merger, or if the stockholder
delivers to Alpha or the surviving corporation, as the case may
be, a written withdrawal of his, her or its demand for
appraisal. Any attempt to withdraw an appraisal demand in this
manner more than 60 days after the effective date of the
merger will require the written approval of the surviving
corporation. In addition, once a petition for appraisal is
filed, the appraisal proceeding may not be dismissed as to any
holder absent court approval; provided, however, that any
stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or
joined that proceeding as a named party may withdraw his, her or
its demand for appraisal and accept the merger consideration
offered pursuant to the merger agreement within 60 days
after the effective date of the merger.
Any Alpha stockholder wishing to exercise appraisal rights is
urged to consult with legal counsel prior to attempting to
exercise such rights.
Dissenters
Rights of Cliffs Shareholders
Under the Ohio General Corporation Law, certain of Cliffs
shareholders are entitled to dissenters rights in
connection with the merger. However, such Cliffs shareholders
are entitled to relief as dissenting shareholders under
Section 1701.85 of the Ohio General Corporation Law only if
they strictly comply with all of the procedural and other
requirements of Section 1701.85, a copy of which has been
attached as Annex E to this document. The following
is a description of the material terms of Section 1701.85.
A Cliffs shareholder who wishes to perfect his, her or its
rights as a dissenting shareholder:
|
|
|
|
|
must be a record holder of the shares of Cliffs as to which he,
she or it seeks relief as of the record date of the Cliffs
special meeting;
|
|
|
|
must not vote such shares of Cliffs in favor of the adoption of
the merger agreement and the approval of the issuance of Cliffs
common shares in the merger; and
|
|
|
|
must deliver to Cliffs, not later than ten days after the Cliffs
special meeting, a written demand for payment to such dissenting
shareholder of the fair cash value of the shares as to which he,
she or it seeks relief. The written demand must state the
dissenting shareholders address, the number and class of
such shares, and the amount claimed by the dissenting
shareholder as the fair cash value of such shares.
|
Voting against the adoption of the merger agreement and the
approval of the issuance of the Cliffs common shares pursuant to
the merger agreement will not satisfy the requirements of a
written demand for payment.
90
Any written demand for payment should be mailed or delivered
to Cliffs at 1100 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio
44114-2544.
Because the written demand must be delivered to Cliffs within
the ten-day
period following the Cliffs special meeting, Cliffs recommends
that a dissenting shareholder use certified or registered mail,
return receipt requested, to confirm that he, she or it has made
timely delivery.
Cliffs will send to the dissenting shareholder, at the address
specified in his, her or its written demand, a request for the
certificate(s) representing the shares as to which the
dissenting shareholder seeks relief. Within 15 days from
the date of the sending of such request by Cliffs, the
dissenting shareholder must deliver to Cliffs the certificate(s)
requested so that Cliffs may endorse on them a legend to the
effect that demand for the fair cash value of such shares has
been made. Cliffs will then return the endorsed certificate(s)
to the dissenting shareholder. Failure to deliver the
certificate(s) within 15 days of the request from Cliffs
will terminate the shareholders rights as a dissenting
shareholder, at the option of Cliffs, exercised by written
notice sent to the dissenting shareholder within 20 days
after the lapse of the
15-day
period (unless a court otherwise directs for good cause shown).
If a dissenting shareholder is a record holder of uncertificated
shares of Cliffs, Cliffs will make an appropriate notation of
the demand for payment in the dissenting shareholders
records.
If the dissenting shareholder and Cliffs cannot agree on the
fair cash value per share of the shares of Cliffs, the
dissenting shareholder or Cliffs may, within three months after
the service of the written demand by the dissenting shareholder,
file a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga
County, Ohio. If the court finds that the dissenting shareholder
is entitled to be paid the fair cash value of any shares, the
court may appoint one or more persons as appraisers to receive
evidence and to recommend a decision on the amount of the fair
cash value.
The fair cash value of a share of Cliffs to which a dissenting
shareholder is entitled under Section 1701.85 of the Ohio
General Corporation Law will be determined as of the day prior
to the Cliffs special meeting. The fair cash value of a share of
Cliffs will be computed as the amount that a willing seller who
is under no compulsion to sell would be willing to accept and
that a willing buyer who is under no compulsion to purchase
would be willing to pay, excluding any appreciation or
depreciation in market value resulting from the issuance of the
Cliffs common shares in connection with the merger.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the fair cash value of a share
may not exceed the amount specified in the dissenting
shareholders written demand. The court will make a finding
as to the fair cash value of a share and render judgment against
Cliffs for the payment of it, with interest at a rate and from a
date as the court considers equitable. The court will assess or
apportion the costs of the proceeding (including reasonable
compensation to the appraisers to be fixed by the court) as it
considers equitable.
The rights of any dissenting shareholder will terminate if:
|
|
|
|
|
the dissenting shareholder has not complied with Section 1701.85
of the Ohio General Corporation Law, unless Cliffs, by its board
of directors, waives this failure (however, pursuant to the
terms of the merger agreement, Cliffs agreed not to waive,
without Alphas consent, any failure of a dissenting
shareholder to comply with Section 1701.85 of the Ohio
General Corporation Law);
|
|
|
|
Cliffs abandons or is finally enjoined or prevented from
carrying out the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, or the shareholders of Cliffs rescind their adoption
of the merger agreement and approval of the issuance of the
Cliffs common shares;
|
|
|
|
the dissenting shareholder withdraws his, her or its written
demand, with the consent of Cliffs, by its board of
directors; or
|
|
|
|
Cliffs and the dissenting shareholder have not agreed upon the
fair cash value per share of the Cliffs shares and neither the
dissenting shareholder nor Cliffs has timely filed or joined in
a complaint in an appropriate court.
|
When a dissenting shareholder exercises his, her or its rights
under Section 1701.85 of the Ohio General Corporation Law,
all other rights accruing from his, her or its Cliffs shares,
including voting and dividend or distribution rights, will be
suspended until Cliffs purchases the shares or the right to
receive fair cash value is otherwise terminated.
Because a proxy card which does not contain voting instructions
regarding the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve
the issuance of Cliffs common shares in the merger will be voted
for the adoption of the
91
merger agreement and the approval of the issuance of Cliffs
common shares in the merger, a Cliffs shareholder who wishes to
exercise dissenters rights must either: (1) not sign
and return the proxy card or otherwise vote at the Cliffs
special meeting, or (2) vote against or abstain from voting
on the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the
issuance of Cliffs common shares in the merger.
Conditions
to Completion of the Merger
Completion of the merger depends on a number of conditions being
satisfied or waived. These conditions include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement by the Alpha stockholders at
the Alpha special meeting;
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the issuance of
Cliffs common shares pursuant to the terms of the merger
agreement by the Cliffs shareholders at the Cliffs special
meeting;
|
|
|
|
the waiting period (including any extension thereof) applicable
to the consummation of the merger under the HSR Act must have
expired or been terminated, and antitrust clearance in Turkey
must have been obtained;
|
|
|
|
making or obtaining consents, approvals, and actions of, filings
with and notices to, the governmental entities required to
consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement, the failure of which to be made or
obtained is reasonably expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on Cliffs or Alpha;
|
|
|
|
absence of any order or law of any governmental authority
preventing the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
approval for listing of Cliffs common shares to be issued in the
merger on the NYSE upon official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
continued effectiveness of the registration statement of which
this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part and the absence
of any stop order or proceeding seeking a stop order by the SEC
suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement;
|
|
|
|
accuracy of each partys representations and warranties in
the merger agreement, except as would not reasonably be expected
to have or result in a material adverse effect on the party
making the representations;
|
|
|
|
performance in all material respects of each partys
covenants set forth in the merger agreement required to be
performed by it at or prior to the closing date of the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
delivery by both parties of customary officers
certificates and tax opinions.
|
Regulatory
Approvals Required for the Merger
The completion of the merger is subject to compliance with the
HSR Act. The notifications required under the HSR Act to the FTC
and the Antitrust Division were filed on July 25, 2008. On
August 22, 2008, the FTC granted an early termination of
the waiting period under the HSR Act without the imposition of
any conditions or restrictions on the consummation of the merger.
In addition, Cliffs and Alpha were required to submit a
pre-merger notification in Turkey and obtain antitrust clearance
from the Turkish Competition Authority. The pre-merger
notification in Turkey was submitted on August 19, 2008,
and the antitrust clearance was granted by the Turkish
Competition Authority effective as of September 11, 2008.
See The Merger Agreement Conditions to
Completion of the Merger beginning on page 109.
Cliffs
Dividend Policy
The Cliffs board of directors approves all dividend
recommendations.
Under the merger agreement, Cliffs has agreed that, prior to the
effective time of the merger, it will not declare, set aside or
pay any dividends on, or make any other distributions in respect
of, any of its capital stock, other than dividends and
distributions by a direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
Cliffs to its parent and other than
92
regular quarterly cash dividends with respect to Cliffs common
shares not in excess of $0.25 per share and
Series A-2
preferred stock in accordance with the terms thereof.
Financing
of the Merger
In connection with the signing of the merger agreement, Cliffs
entered into a financing commitment letter with J.P. Morgan
and JPMCB. J.P. Morgan intends to syndicate this facility
to a group of lenders identified by it in consultation with
Cliffs, which lenders (including JPMCB) are referred to
collectively as the financing parties. This financing commitment
letter contemplates a senior unsecured term loan A facility for
up to $1.9 billion. Cliffs intends to use the proceeds of
this facility to finance the cash portion of the merger
consideration, refinance indebtedness of Alpha, and pay all
fees, expenses and other amounts contemplated to be paid by
Cliffs or its affiliates under the merger agreement.
Cliffs obligation to complete the merger is not subject to
any financing contingency.
The obligations of the financing parties to make available the
facility is subject to the satisfaction of a number of
conditions including, without limitation: absence since
December 31, 2007 of any material adverse change or
material adverse effect relating to Alpha;
J.P. Morgans and JPMCBs satisfaction that prior
to and during the syndication of the facility there shall be no
competing offering, placement or arrangement of any debt
securities or bank financing (subject to certain exceptions);
Cliffs using commercially reasonable efforts to solicit a
proposed amendment to its existing revolving and term credit
facility pursuant to which the applicable margins and pricing
methodology under the existing facility are conformed to the
applicable margins and pricing methodology in the definitive
financing documentation for this new facility to finance the
cash portion of the merger consideration; the negotiation,
execution and delivery on or before November 15, 2008 of
definitive financing documentation from the facility
satisfactory to JPMCB and its counsel; the consummation of the
merger and the funding of the facility on or before
January 15, 2009 (or April 15, 2009 in certain
circumstances); Cliffs or Alpha having tendered to repurchase
100% of the outstanding 2.375% Convertible Senior Notes due
2015 of Alpha (which condition has been waived by J.P. Morgan
and JPMCB); the leverage ratio (giving pro forma effect to the
merger) on the closing date of the merger not exceeding the
applicable leverage requirement as of the then most recently
ended fiscal quarter or fiscal year (as applicable) prior to the
closing date of the merger in respect of which Cliffs has
delivered its quarterly or annual financial statements to the
lenders under the existing revolving and term credit facility;
and certain other customary closing conditions, including,
without limitation, delivery of customary legal opinions and
officers certifications, receipt of ratings from ratings
agencies, and the payment of fees and expenses.
Certain direct and indirect U.S. subsidiaries of Cliffs
will guarantee the obligations under the facility. The facility
will also include other covenants and restrictions customary for
senior unsecured credit facilities. Cliffs will be required to
indemnify and hold harmless J.P. Morgan and each financing
party and their respective affiliates and their partners,
directors, officers, employees, agents and advisors from and
against all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, and expenses
arising out of or relating to the facility, Cliffs use of
loan proceeds or the commitments, except to the extent any such
loss, liability, claim, damage or expense is found to have
resulted from such indemnified partys gross negligence or
willful misconduct.
Accounting
Treatment
The merger will be accounted for as a business combination using
the purchase method of accounting. Cliffs will be
the acquirer for financial accounting purposes.
MATERIAL
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a summary of the material United States federal
income tax consequences of the merger to U.S. holders of
Cliffs common shares or Alpha common stock who hold their stock
as a capital asset. The summary is based on the Code, the
Treasury regulations issued under the Code, and administrative
rulings and court decisions in effect as of the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, all of which are subject to
change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect.
93
For purposes of this discussion, the term
U.S. holder means:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation created or organized under the laws of the United
States or any of its political subdivisions;
|
|
|
|
a trust that (i) is subject to the supervision of a court
within the United States and the control of one or more United
States persons or (ii) has a valid election in effect under
applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a
United States person; or
|
|
|
|
an estate that is subject to United States federal income tax on
its income regardless of its source.
|
If a partnership holds Cliffs common shares or Alpha common
stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on
the status of the partners and the activities of the
partnership. If a U.S. holder is a partner in a partnership
holding Cliffs common shares or Alpha common stock, the
U.S. holder should consult its tax advisors.
This summary is not a complete description of all the tax
consequences of the merger and, in particular, may not address
United States federal income tax considerations applicable to
holders of Cliffs common shares or Alpha common stock who are
subject to special treatment under United States federal income
tax law (including, for example,
non-United
States persons, financial institutions, dealers in securities,
insurance companies or tax-exempt entities, holders who acquired
Cliffs common shares or Alpha common stock pursuant to the
exercise of an employee stock option or right or otherwise as
compensation, and holders who hold Cliffs common shares or Alpha
common stock as part of a hedge, straddle or conversion
transaction). This summary does not address the tax consequences
of any transaction other than the merger. This summary does not
address the tax consequences to any person who actually or
constructively owns 5% or more of Cliffs common shares or Alpha
common stock. Also, this summary does not address United States
federal income tax considerations applicable to holders of
options or warrants to purchase Cliffs common shares or Alpha
common stock, or holders of debt instruments convertible into
Cliffs common shares or Alpha common stock. In addition, no
information is provided with respect to the tax consequences of
the merger under applicable state, local or
non-United
States laws.
The obligations of Cliffs and Alpha to consummate the merger as
currently anticipated are conditioned on the receipt of opinions
of their respective tax counsel, Jones Day (as to Cliffs) and
Cleary Gottlieb (as to Alpha), dated the effective date of the
merger, each referred to as a tax opinion, to the effect that
the merger will be treated as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and that Alpha and
Cliffs will each be a party to the reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code. Each of the tax
opinions will be subject to customary qualifications and
assumptions, including the assumption that the merger will be
completed according to the terms of the merger agreement. In
rendering the tax opinions, each counsel may rely upon
representations and covenants, including those contained in
certificates of officers of Cliffs and Alpha. Although the
merger agreement allows each of Cliffs and Alpha to waive this
condition to closing, neither Cliffs nor Alpha currently
anticipates doing so.
Neither the tax opinions nor the discussion that follows is
binding on the Internal Revenue Service, referred to as the IRS,
or the courts. In addition, the parties do not intend to request
a ruling from the IRS with respect to the merger. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the
conclusion expressed in the tax opinions or the discussion
below, or that a court will not sustain such a challenge.
Federal
income tax consequences to Cliffs shareholders who do not hold
any Alpha common stock
Because holders of Cliffs common shares will retain their common
shares in the merger, holders of Cliffs common shares will not
recognize gain or loss upon the merger.
Federal
income tax consequences to Alpha stockholders if the merger is
consummated as currently anticipated
The following discussion assumes that the exchange of Alpha
common stock for Cliffs common shares pursuant to the merger
will constitute a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code.
94
A holder of Alpha common stock who receives cash and Cliffs
common shares in the merger generally will recognize gain equal
to the lesser of (i) the excess of the sum of the fair
market value of the Cliffs common shares received by the holder
in exchange for Alpha common stock and the amount of cash
received by the holder (including any cash received in lieu of
fractional shares) in exchange for Alpha common stock over the
holders tax basis in the Alpha common stock and
(ii) the amount of cash received by the holder in exchange
for Alpha common stock (excluding any cash received in lieu of
fractional shares). No loss will be recognized by holders of
Alpha common stock in the merger, except, possibly, in
connection with the receipt of cash in lieu of fractional
shares, as discussed below. Any gain recognized by a holder of
Alpha common stock generally will be long-term capital gain if
the holders holding period of the Alpha common stock is
more than one year. Capital gains of individuals derived in
respect of capital assets held for more than one year are
eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The aggregate tax basis
of the Cliffs common shares received (including fractional
shares deemed received and redeemed as described below) will be
equal to the aggregate tax basis of the Alpha common stock
surrendered, reduced by the amount of cash the holder of Alpha
common stock received (excluding any cash received in lieu of
fractional shares), and increased by the amount of gain that the
holder of Alpha common stock recognizes, but excluding any gain
or loss from the deemed receipt and redemption of fractional
shares described below. The holding period of Cliffs common
shares received by a holder of Alpha common stock in the merger
will include the holding period of the holders Alpha
common stock.
Cash received by a holder of Alpha common stock in lieu of
fractional shares will generally be treated as if the holder
received the fractional shares in the merger and then received
the cash in redemption of the fractional shares. The holder
should generally recognize capital gain or loss equal to the
difference between the amount of the cash received in lieu of
fractional shares and the portion of the holders tax basis
allocable to the fractional shares.
Backup
withholding
Backup withholding may apply with respect to the consideration
received by a holder of Alpha common stock in the merger unless
the holder:
|
|
|
|
|
is a corporation or comes within certain other exempt categories
and, when required, demonstrates this fact; or
|
|
|
|
provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies as
to no loss of exemption from backup withholding and that such
holder is a U.S. person (including a U.S. resident
alien) and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of
the backup withholding rules.
|
A holder of Alpha common stock who does not provide Cliffs (or
the exchange agent) with its correct taxpayer identification
number may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Any
amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be
allowed as a refund or a credit against the holders
federal income tax liability, provided that the holder timely
furnishes certain required information to the IRS.
Reporting
requirements
U.S. holders of Alpha common stock receiving Cliffs common
shares in the merger will be required to retain records
pertaining to the merger. U.S. holders who owned at least
five percent (by vote or value) of the total outstanding Alpha
common stock before the merger or whose tax basis in the Alpha
common stock surrendered pursuant to the merger equals or
exceeds USD 1 million are subject to certain
requirements with respect to the merger. U.S. holders are
urged to consult with their tax advisors with respect to these
and other reporting requirements applicable to the merger.
THE FOREGOING DISCUSSION OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX
CONSEQUENCES IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT
INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF ALL TAX
CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO THE MERGER. TAX MATTERS ARE VERY
COMPLICATED, AND THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO YOU WILL
DEPEND UPON THE FACTS OF YOUR PARTICULAR SITUATION. BECAUSE
INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES MAY DIFFER, WE URGE YOU TO CONSULT WITH
YOUR TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE APPLICABILITY TO YOU OF THE
RULES DISCUSSED ABOVE AND THE PARTICULAR TAX EFFECTS TO YOU
OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING THE APPLICATION OF STATE, LOCAL AND
FOREIGN TAX LAWS.
95
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of certain material provisions of the
merger agreement, a copy of which is attached as
Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and
is incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by
reference. We urge you to read carefully this entire joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including the annexes and the other
documents to which we have referred you. You should also review
the section titled Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 239.
The merger agreement has been included for your convenience
to provide you with information regarding its terms, and we
recommend that you read it in its entirety. Except for its
status as the contractual document that establishes and governs
the legal relations between Cliffs and Alpha with respect to the
merger, we do not intend for the merger agreement to be a source
of factual, business or operational information about either
Cliffs or Alpha. The merger agreement contains
representations and warranties that Cliffs and Alpha have made
to each other. Those representations and warranties are
qualified in several important respects, which you should
consider as you read them in the merger agreement.
First, except for the parties themselves, under the terms of the
merger agreement, only certain other specifically identified
persons are third party beneficiaries of the merger agreement
who may enforce it and rely on its terms. As shareholders, you
are not third party beneficiaries of the merger agreement and
therefore may not enforce or rely upon its terms and conditions.
Second, the representations and warranties are qualified in
their entirety by certain information each of Cliffs and Alpha
filed with the SEC prior to the date of the merger agreement, as
well as by a confidential disclosure letter that each of Cliffs
and Alpha prepared and delivered to the other immediately prior
to signing the merger agreement.
Third, certain of the representations and warranties made by
Cliffs and merger sub, on the one hand, and Alpha, on the other
hand, were made as of a specified date, may be subject to a
contractual standard of materiality different from what might be
viewed as material to shareholders, and may have been used for
the purpose of allocating risk between the parties to the merger
agreement rather than as establishing matters as facts.
Fourth, none of the representations or warranties will survive
the closing of the merger and they will therefore have no legal
effect under the merger agreement after the closing. The parties
will not be able to assert the inaccuracy of the representations
and warranties as a basis for refusing to close unless all such
inaccuracies as a whole would reasonably be expected to have or
result in, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on the party that made the representations and
warranties, except for certain limited representations and
warranties that must be true and correct in all respects.
Otherwise, for purposes of the merger agreement, the
representations and warranties will be deemed to have been
sufficiently accurate to require a closing.
For the foregoing reasons, you should not rely on the
representations and warranties as statements of factual
information. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter
of the representations and warranties may have changed since the
date of the merger agreement, and subsequently developed or new
information qualifying a representation or warranty may have
been included in a filing with the SEC made since the date of
the merger agreement (including in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus).
The
Merger; Closing
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the merger
agreement, and in accordance with Delaware law, at the effective
time of the merger, merger sub will merge with and into Alpha.
The separate corporate existence of merger sub will cease.
However, at the election of Cliffs or Alpha, if in their
reasonable good faith opinion, such action is necessary to
preserve the tax consequences outlined in the merger agreement,
Cliffs, merger sub and Alpha will cooperate to (i) convert
merger sub into a limited liability company prior to the
effective time of the merger, and, possibly,
(ii) restructure the merger so that Alpha shall be merged
with and into merger sub, with merger sub continuing as the
surviving corporation, provided, that neither Cliffs or merger
sub nor Alpha will be deemed to have breached any of their
respective representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
set forth in the merger agreement by reason of such election.
96
If the merger is restructured as described in the immediately
preceding paragraph, the merger will have the effects described
in Annex G. However, any such restructuring will not
affect the merger consideration to be received by holders of
Alpha common stock.
The closing of the merger will occur at a date and time agreed
by the parties, but no later than the second business day
following the date on which all of the conditions to the merger,
other than conditions that, by their terms, cannot be satisfied
until the closing date (but subject to satisfaction of such
conditions) have been satisfied or waived, unless the parties
agree on another time. Cliffs and Alpha expect to complete the
merger prior to the end of 2008. However, they cannot assure you
that such timing will occur or that the merger will be completed
as expected.
As soon as practicable on or after the closing date of the
merger, merger sub or Alpha will file a certificate of merger
with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. The
effective time of the merger will be the time merger sub or
Alpha files the certificate of merger or at a later time upon
which Cliffs and Alpha may agree and specify in the certificate
of merger.
Directors
and Officers of the Surviving Company
The directors of merger sub immediately prior to the effective
time of the merger will be the directors of the surviving
company until the earlier of their death, resignation or removal
or until their respective successors are duly elected and
qualified, as the case may be. The officers of Alpha immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger will be the officers
of the surviving company until the earlier of their death,
resignation or removal or until their respective successors are
duly elected and qualified, as the case may be.
Cliffs
Board of Directors; Certain Officers
As of the effective time of the merger, the board of directors
of Cliffs will take all actions as may be required to appoint to
vacancies or newly-created seats on such board of directors, the
following persons: Michael J. Quillen (to serve as non-executive
vice-chairman) and Glenn A. Eisenberg. Mr. Quillen and
Mr. Eisenberg will serve until their respective successors
have been duly elected and qualified or until the earlier of
their death, resignation or removal in accordance with the
amended articles of incorporation and regulations of Cliffs and
applicable law. Cliffs and Alpha have agreed that at least one
of these designated directors will meet the independence
standards of the listing standards of the NYSE. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, if, prior to the effective time of the merger,
either designee declines or is unable to serve, Cliffs and Alpha
will agree on mutually acceptable replacement designees.
As of the effective time of the merger agreement, Cliffs will
take all actions as may be required to appoint Kevin S.
Crutchfield as president of the coal division of Cliffs.
Certificate
of Incorporation and By-laws of the Surviving Company
The restated certificate of incorporation of Alpha will be
amended to read in its entirety as the certificate of
incorporation of merger sub as in effect immediately prior to
the completion of the merger, and, as so amended, will be the
certificate of incorporation of the surviving company until
changed or amended. The by-laws of merger sub, as in effect
immediately prior to the completion of the merger, will be the
by-laws of the surviving company until changed or amended.
Merger
Consideration
Upon the effectiveness of the merger, each share of Alpha common
stock (other than shares held by any dissenting Alpha
stockholder that has properly exercised appraisal rights in
accordance with Delaware law as described above, shares held in
treasury by Alpha or shares owned by Cliffs) will be converted
into the right to receive from Cliffs the merger consideration,
consisting of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
$22.23 in cash, without interest; and
|
|
|
|
0.95 of a validly issued, fully paid, nonassessable common share
of Cliffs.
|
Upon completion of the merger, each share of Alpha common stock
held by Cliffs, Alpha or any direct or indirect majority-owned
subsidiary of Cliffs or Alpha immediately prior to the effective
time of the merger will be
97
automatically cancelled and extinguished, and none of Cliffs,
Alpha or any of their respective direct or indirect majority
owned subsidiaries will receive any consideration in exchange
for those shares.
Fractional
Shares
No fractional Cliffs common shares will be issued in the merger.
Instead, holders of Alpha common stock who would otherwise be
entitled to receive a fractional common share of Cliffs will
receive an amount in cash (rounded up to the nearest whole cent
and without interest) determined by multiplying the fractional
share interest by the closing price for a common share of Cliffs
as reported on the NYSE Composite Transactions Reports (as
reported in The Wall Street Journal, or, if not reported
therein, any other authoritative sources) on the closing date of
the merger, or if such date is not a trading day, the trading
day immediately preceding the closing.
Appraisal
Rights
Shares of Alpha common stock held by any Alpha stockholder who
properly demands payment for his, her or its shares in
compliance with the appraisal rights under Section 262 of
the DGCL will not be converted into the right to receive the
merger consideration. Alpha stockholders properly exercising
appraisal rights will be entitled to payment as further
described above under The Merger Appraisal
Rights of Alpha Stockholders beginning on page 87.
However, if any Alpha stockholder withdraws his, her or its
demand for appraisal (in accordance with Section 262 of the
DGCL) or becomes ineligible for appraisal, then the shares of
Alpha common stock held by that Alpha stockholder will be
converted as of the effective time of the merger into and
represent the right to receive the merger consideration, without
interest, in accordance with the merger agreement.
Exchange
Procedures
Prior to the effective time of the merger, Cliffs will enter
into an agreement with an exchange agent for the merger to
handle the exchange of shares of Alpha common stock for the
merger consideration, including the payment of cash for
fractional shares. As of the effective time of the merger,
Cliffs will deposit with the exchange agent, for the benefit of
the holders of Alpha common stock, immediately available funds
sufficient to pay the aggregate cash consideration and
certificates representing Cliffs common shares issuable in the
merger in exchange for outstanding shares of Alpha common stock,
including any cash to be paid in lieu of fractional shares or in
respect of any dividends or distributions on common shares of
Cliffs with a record date after the effective time of the merger.
At the effective time of the merger, each certificate
representing shares of Alpha common stock that has not been
surrendered will represent only the right to receive upon
surrender of that certificate the merger consideration,
dividends and other distributions on common shares of Cliffs
with a record date after the effective time of the merger,
dividends and other distributions on shares of Alpha common
stock with a record date prior to the effective time of the
merger that remain unpaid as of the effective time of the
merger, and cash, without interest, in lieu of fractional
shares. Following the effective time of the merger, no further
registrations of transfers on the stock transfer books of the
surviving company of the shares of Alpha common stock will be
made. If, after the effective time of the merger, Alpha stock
certificates are presented to Cliffs, the surviving company or
the exchange agent for any reason, they will be cancelled and
exchanged as described above.
Exchange
of Shares
As soon as reasonably practicable after the effective time of
the merger, and in any event within 5 business days thereafter,
Cliffs will cause the exchange agent to mail to each holder of
record of an Alpha stock certificate or book-entry share whose
shares of Alpha common stock were converted into the right to
receive the merger consideration, a letter of transmittal and
instructions explaining how to surrender Alpha stock
certificates or book-entry shares in exchange for the merger
consideration.
After the effective time of the merger, and upon surrender of an
Alpha stock certificate or book-entry share to the exchange
agent, together with a letter of transmittal, duly executed, and
other documents as may reasonably be required by the exchange
agent, the holder of the Alpha stock certificate or book-entry
share will be entitled to receive the merger consideration in
the form of (i) a certificate share representing that
number of whole common
98
shares of Cliffs that such holder has the right to receive
pursuant to the merger agreement and (ii) a check for the
full amount of cash that such holder has the right to receive
pursuant to the provisions of the merger agreement, including
the cash consideration, cash in lieu of fractional shares, and
dividends and other distributions on common shares of Cliffs
with a record date after the effective time of the merger and
the Alpha stock certificates surrendered will be cancelled. No
interest will be paid or will accrue on any merger consideration
payable under the merger agreement.
Lost
Stock Certificates
If any stock certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed,
upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the person
claiming the stock certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed
and, if required by Cliffs or the surviving company, as the case
may be, the posting by such person of a bond in a reasonable
amount as Cliffs or the surviving company, as the case may be,
may direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made
against it with respect to the stock certificate, the exchange
agent will issue, in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed
stock certificate, the merger consideration, dividends and other
distributions on common shares of Cliffs with a record date
after the effective time of the merger, and cash, without
interest, in lieu of fractional shares.
Alpha stock certificates should not be returned with the
enclosed proxy card(s). Alpha stock certificates should be
returned with a validly executed transmittal letter and
accompanying instructions that will be provided to Alpha
stockholders following the effective time of the merger.
Termination
of Exchange Fund
Twelve months after the effective time of the merger, Cliffs may
require the exchange agent to deliver to Cliffs all cash and
common shares of Cliffs remaining in the exchange fund.
Thereafter, Alpha stockholders must look only to Cliffs for
payment of the merger consideration on their shares of Alpha
common stock.
Representations
and Warranties
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties
made by each party to the other, which are subject, in some
cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications, including
exceptions and qualifications that would not have a material
adverse effect on Alpha or Cliffs, as applicable. These
representations and warranties relate to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
due organization, good standing and the requisite corporate
power and authority to carry on their respective businesses;
|
|
|
|
ownership of subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
capital structure and equity securities;
|
|
|
|
corporate power and authority to enter into the merger agreement
and due execution, delivery and enforceability of the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
board of directors approval;
|
|
|
|
absence of conflicts with charter documents, breaches of
contracts and agreements, liens upon assets and violations of
applicable law resulting from the execution and delivery of the
merger agreement and consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
absence of required governmental or other third party consents
in connection with execution and delivery of the merger
agreement and consummation of the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement other than governmental filings specified
in the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
timely filing of required documents with the SEC, compliance
with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, which is
referred to as the Securities Act, and the Exchange Act and the
absence of untrue statements of material facts or omissions of
material facts in those documents;
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
compliance of financial statements as to form with applicable
accounting requirements and SEC rules and regulations and
preparation in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
absence of misleading information contained or incorporated into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the registration
statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a
part;
|
|
|
|
absence of specified changes or events and conduct of business
in the ordinary course since December 31, 2007;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws and holding of all necessary
permits;
|
|
|
|
absence of proceedings before any governmental entity;
|
|
|
|
employee benefits matters and ERISA compliance;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
environmental matters and compliance with environmental laws;
|
|
|
|
the affirmative vote required by Alpha stockholders to adopt the
merger agreement and the affirmative vote required by
Cliffs shareholders to adopt the merger agreement and
approve the issuance of Cliffs common shares;
|
|
|
|
real property and assets;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
labor agreements and employee benefits issues;
|
|
|
|
certain material contracts;
|
|
|
|
insurance;
|
|
|
|
interested party transactions;
|
|
|
|
receipt of a fairness opinion from each companys financial
advisors; and
|
|
|
|
brokers or finders fees.
|
Cliffs and merger sub made additional representations and
warranties to Alpha in the merger agreement, including the
availability of funds sufficient to pay the cash portion of the
merger consideration and all other cash amounts to be paid
pursuant to the merger agreement.
Alpha also made additional representations and warranties to
Cliffs, including the non-applicability of anti-takeover laws to
the merger.
For purposes of the merger agreement, a material adverse
effect on Cliffs or Alpha means:
|
|
|
|
|
any event, circumstance, change, occurrence or state of facts
that has a material adverse effect on the business, financial
condition or results of operations of such party and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than events,
circumstances, changes, occurrences or any state of facts
relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in industries relating to such party and its
subsidiaries in general, other than the effects of any such
changes which adversely affect such party and its subsidiaries
to a materially greater extent than their competitors in the
applicable industries in which such party and its subsidiaries
compete;
|
|
|
|
general legal, regulatory, political, business, economic,
financial or securities market conditions in the United States
or elsewhere, other than the effects of any such changes which
adversely affect such party and its subsidiaries to a materially
greater extent than its competitors in the applicable industries
in which such party and its subsidiaries compete;
|
|
|
|
the execution or the announcement of the merger agreement, the
undertaking and performance of the obligations contemplated by
the merger agreement or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the impact
thereof on relationships with customers, suppliers,
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
distributors, partners or employees, or any litigation arising
in relation to the merger agreement or the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
acts of war, insurrection, sabotage or terrorism (or the
escalation of the foregoing);
|
|
|
|
changes in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or
the accounting rules or regulations of the SEC; and
|
|
|
|
the fact, in and of itself (and not the underlying causes
thereof), that such party or any of its subsidiaries failed to
meet any projections, forecasts or revenue or earnings
predictions; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
any event, circumstance, change, occurrence or state of facts
that prevent or materially delay the ability of such party to
consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
|
The representations and warranties contained in the merger
agreement will not survive the consummation of the merger, but
they form the basis of specified conditions to the parties
obligations to complete the merger.
Covenants
and Agreements
Operating
Covenants
Alpha has agreed that prior to the effective time of the merger
it and its subsidiaries will carry on their businesses in the
ordinary course. With specified exceptions, Alpha has agreed,
among other things, not to, and not to permit its subsidiaries
to:
|
|
|
|
|
declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or make any other
distributions in respect of, any of its capital stock;
|
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock;
|
|
|
|
except as required in Alphas stock plans, purchase, redeem
or otherwise acquire any shares of its or its subsidiaries
capital stock or any other securities of Alpha or any of its
subsidiaries or any rights, warrants or options to acquire any
of those shares or other securities;
|
|
|
|
issue or authorize the issuance of, deliver, sell or encumber
any shares of its capital stock, any other voting securities or
any securities convertible into, or any rights, warrants or
options to acquire, any such shares, voting securities or
convertible securities;
|
|
|
|
amend its certificate of incorporation or by-laws;
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any person other than another Alpha
entity;
|
|
|
|
encumber or dispose of any of its properties or assets, other
than dispositions of inventory or equipment in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
enter into commitments for capital expenditures involving
(i) in the case of capital expenditures in respect of
individual items of equipment more than $5 million
individually or (ii) more than $50 million in the
aggregate;
|
|
|
|
other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, incur any indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
take certain other actions with respect to employee benefit
plans, compensation arrangements and collective bargaining
agreements;
|
|
|
|
change the accounting principles used by it;
|
|
|
|
make acquisitions for consideration in excess of
$50 million in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
make, change or rescind any express or deemed election with
respect to taxes, settle or compromise any claim or action
relating to taxes, or change any of its methods of accounting or
of reporting income or deductions for tax purposes;
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
satisfy claims or liabilities other than satisfaction in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, in
accordance with their terms or in amounts not to exceed
$5 million in 2008 and $2 million in 2009;
|
|
|
|
make any loans, advances (other than advances to contract miners
in excess of $10 million in the aggregate) or capital
contributions to, or investments in, any other person in excess
of $10 million in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
modify, amend or terminate any material contract, other than in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
waive, release, relinquish or assign any material right or claim
under a material contract or cancel or forgive any indebtedness
owed to Alpha or any of its subsidiaries in excess of
$2 million in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
take any action to exempt any person (other than Cliffs and its
subsidiaries) or any action taken thereby, except to the extent
necessary to take any actions that Alpha or any third party
would otherwise be permitted to take pursuant to the provisions
of the merger agreement governing Alphas non-solicitation
obligations, from the provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL
or any other state takeover law; or
|
|
|
|
authorize, or commit or agree to take, any of the foregoing
actions.
|
Cliffs has agreed that, prior to the effective time of the
merger, it and its subsidiaries will carry on their businesses
in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and, to the
extent consistent therewith, use reasonable best efforts to
preserve intact their current business organizations, keep
available the services of their current officers and other key
employees and preserve their relationships with customers,
suppliers, distributors and other persons having business
dealings with them. Merger sub has agreed that prior to the
effective time of the merger, it will not engage in any
activities of any nature except as contemplated in the merger
agreement. With specified exceptions set forth in the merger
agreement, Cliffs has agreed, among other things, not to, and
not to permit its subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or make any other
distributions in respect of, any of its capital stock, except,
among other things, for quarterly cash dividends with respect to
(i) Cliffs common shares not in excess of $0.25 per common
share of Cliffs and (b) the
Series A-2
preferred stock in accordance with the terms thereof;
|
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock;
|
|
|
|
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of capital
stock of Cliffs or any of its subsidiaries or any other
securities of Cliffs or any of its subsidiaries or any rights,
warrants or options to acquire any of those shares or other
securities, except pursuant to agreements entered into with
respect to Cliffs stock plans that are in effect as of the close
of business on the date of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
issue or authorize the issuance of, deliver, sell, or encumber
any shares of its capital stock, or any other securities in
respect of, in lieu of, or in substitution for, shares of its
capital stock, any other voting securities or any securities
convertible into, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire,
any of such shares, voting securities or convertible securities;
|
|
|
|
amend its organizational documents;
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any person;
|
|
|
|
incur any long-term indebtedness or incur short-term
indebtedness, other than (1) up to $10 million of
short-term indebtedness under lines of credit existing on the
date of the merger agreement or (2) indebtedness incurred
pursuant to the terms of Cliffs financings of the cash
portion of the merger consideration;
|
|
|
|
change the accounting principles used by it;
|
|
|
|
make, change or rescind any express or deemed election with
respect to taxes, settle or compromise any claim or action
relating to taxes, or change any of its methods of accounting or
of reporting income or deductions for tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
satisfy any claims or liabilities, other than in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice or in
accordance with their terms or in an amount not to exceed
$5 million in the aggregate;
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
make any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or
investments in, any other person, except for loans, advances,
capital contributions or investments between any wholly-owned
Cliffs subsidiary and Cliffs or another wholly-owned Cliffs
subsidiary and except for employee advances for expenses in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice; or
|
|
|
|
authorize, or commit or agree to take, any of the foregoing
actions.
|
No
Solicitation by Alpha
Alpha has agreed, and agreed to cause its officers, directors,
employees and representatives, other than in the case of
officers, directors and employees, in their capacity as such, to
cease all then existing activities with any parties with respect
to or that could reasonably be expected to lead to a
company takeover proposal. A company takeover
proposal means any inquiry, proposal or offer from any person
(other than Cliffs or its affiliates) relating to any:
|
|
|
|
|
direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of a business that
constitutes 25% or more of the net revenues, net income or the
assets of Alpha and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
|
|
|
|
direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of 25% or more of any
class of equity securities of Alpha;
|
|
|
|
tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would result
in any person beneficially owning 25% or more of any class of
equity securities of Alpha; or
|
|
|
|
merger, consolidation, business combination, asset purchase,
recapitalization or similar transaction involving Alpha, other
than the transactions contemplated or permitted by the merger
agreement.
|
In addition, Alpha has agreed that it will not, and will direct
its officers, directors, employees, and representatives not to,
directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage (including by way of
furnishing non-public information), or knowingly facilitate, any
inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes, or
would reasonably be expected to lead to, a company takeover
proposal;
|
|
|
|
enter into any agreement relating to a company takeover proposal
or enter into any agreement, arrangement or understanding
requiring Alpha to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the
merger or any other transaction contemplated by the merger
agreement; or
|
|
|
|
initiate or participate in any way in any discussions or
negotiations regarding, or knowingly furnish or disclose to any
person (other than to Cliffs) any non-public information with
respect to, or take any other action to knowingly facilitate or
knowingly further any inquiries or the making of any proposal
that constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to,
any company takeover proposal.
|
Notwithstanding these restrictions, Alpha may, at any time prior
to obtaining Alpha stockholder approval at the Alpha special
meeting, in response to an unsolicited bona fide written company
takeover proposal that the board of directors of Alpha
determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside
counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized
reputation) constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead
to a superior proposal (as defined below), and which company
takeover proposal was made after the date of the merger
agreement and did not otherwise result from a breach of
Alphas non-solicitation obligations, if and only to the
extent that the board of directors of Alpha determines in good
faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that
failure to do so could be reasonably likely to be a violation of
its fiduciary duties to the Alpha stockholders under applicable
law, and subject to compliance with its non-solicitation
obligations set forth in the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
furnish non-public information with respect to Alpha and its
subsidiaries to the person making the company takeover proposal
(and its representatives) pursuant to a customary
confidentiality agreement not less restrictive of the person
than the existing confidentiality agreement between Alpha and
Cliffs, provided that all the information is, previously
provided to Cliffs or is provided to Cliffs prior to or
substantially concurrent with the time it is provided to such
person; and
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
participate in discussions or negotiations with the person
making the company takeover proposal (and its representatives)
regarding the company takeover proposal.
|
Superior proposal means any bona fide, written inquiry, proposal
or offer from any person (other than Cliffs or its affiliates)
relating to any:
|
|
|
|
|
direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of a business that
constitutes 75% or more of the net revenues, net income or the
assets of Alpha and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
|
|
|
|
direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of 75% or more of any
class of equity securities of Alpha;
|
|
|
|
tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would result
in any person beneficially owning 75% or more of any class of
equity securities of Alpha; or
|
|
|
|
merger, consolidation, business combination, asset purchase,
recapitalization or similar transaction involving Alpha, other
than the transactions contemplated or permitted by the merger
agreement;
|
that the board of directors of Alpha determines in its good
faith judgment (after consulting with outside counsel and a
financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation), taking
into account all legal, financial and regulatory and other
aspects of the proposal (including any
break-up
fees, expense reimbursement provisions and conditions to
consummation), the likelihood and timing of required
governmental approvals and consummation and the ability of the
person making the proposal to finance and pay the contemplated
consideration, would be more favorable to the stockholders of
Alpha than the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement
(including any adjustment to the terms and conditions proposed
by Cliffs in response to such superior proposal).
Alpha has agreed to promptly (but in any event within one
calendar day) notify Cliffs in the event that Alpha receives,
directly or indirectly, any company takeover proposal, or any
request for non-public information relating to Alpha by any
person that informs Alpha or its representatives that the person
is considering making, or has made, a company takeover proposal,
or any request for discussions or negotiations relating to a
possible company takeover proposal. Alpha has also agreed to
keep Cliffs reasonably informed, in all material respects, of
the status and details (including amendments or proposed
amendments) of any such request, company takeover proposal or
inquiry.
Alpha
Special Meeting and Board Recommendation
Alpha has agreed that Alphas board of directors will
convene and hold a meeting of Alpha stockholders, recommend that
such stockholders adopt the merger agreement and use its
reasonable best efforts to obtain such approval. Alpha has
further agreed that neither Alphas board of directors nor
any committee of Alphas board of directors will cause a
company adverse recommendation change.
A company adverse recommendation change means that
the Alpha board of directors decides to (i) withdraw, or
publicly propose to withdraw (or, in either case, modify in a
manner adverse to Cliffs), the approval recommendation or
declaration of advisability by the board of directors of the
merger agreement or (ii) recommend, adopt or approve, or
propose publicly to recommend, adopt or approve, any company
takeover proposal.
However, if prior to obtaining Alpha stockholder approval,
Alphas board of directors determines in good faith that
failure to do so would be reasonably likely to be a violation of
its fiduciary duties to its stockholders under applicable law,
then Alpha may (1) terminate the merger agreement and cause
Alpha to enter into an acquisition agreement with respect to a
superior proposal or (2) make a company adverse
recommendation change, provided that Alpha fulfills the
following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha must provide written notice advising Cliffs that the Alpha
board of directors intends to take such action and specifying
the reasons therefor, including, if applicable, the terms and
conditions of any superior proposal that is the basis of the
proposed action by the Alpha board of directors (and any
amendment to the amount of consideration or any other material
term of the superior proposal will require a new notice to
Cliffs);
|
|
|
|
for 3 business days following Cliffs receipt of this
written notice, Alpha must negotiate with Cliffs in good faith
to make such adjustments to the terms and conditions of the
merger as would enable Alpha to proceed with its recommendation
of the merger agreement and the merger and not make such company
adverse
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
recommendation change or terminate the merger agreement in order
to enter into an acquisition agreement with respect to a
superior proposal; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
if applicable, at the end of such three-business day period, the
Alpha board of directors must continue to believe that the
company takeover proposal, if any, constitutes a superior
proposal (after taking into account any adjustments to the terms
and conditions of the merger agreement made pursuant to the
negotiations described in the preceding bullet).
|
The merger agreement does not prohibit Alpha from taking and
disclosing to its stockholders, in compliance with the rules and
regulations of the Exchange Act, a position regarding any
unsolicited tender offer for Alpha common stock or from making
any other disclosure to Alpha stockholders if, in the good faith
judgment of the Alpha board of directors, after consultation
with outside counsel, failure to make such disclosure would
reasonably be expected to violate its or Alphas
obligations under applicable law.
Cliffs
Special Meeting and Board Recommendation
Cliffs has agreed that Cliffs board of directors will
convene and hold a special meeting of Cliffs shareholders,
recommend that such shareholders adopt the merger agreement and
approve the issuance of Cliffs common shares in connection with
the merger, and use its reasonable best efforts to obtain such
approval. If, prior to obtaining Cliffs shareholder approval,
the Cliffs board of directors determines in good faith
that failure to withdraw or modify or publicly propose to
withdraw or modify its recommendation of the adoption of the
merger agreement and approval of the issuance of Cliffs common
shares in connection with the merger would be reasonably likely
to be a violation of its fiduciary duties to the shareholders of
Cliffs under the Ohio General Corporation Law, Cliffs board of
directors may take such action, provided that Cliffs provides
written notice advising Alpha that the Cliffs board of directors
intends to take such action and specifying the reasons therefor,
and negotiates in good faith with Alpha to make such adjustments
to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement as would
enable Cliffs to proceed with its recommendation in favor of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Access
to Information; Confidentiality
During the period prior to the effective time of the merger,
Cliffs and Alpha will, and will cause each of their subsidiaries
to, afford to the other party and its representatives reasonable
access during normal business hours to all of their respective
properties, books, contracts, commitments, personnel and
records, except that neither party is required to provide the
other with any information that it reasonably believes it cannot
provide due to contractual or legal restrictions, or which it
believes is competitively sensitive information. The information
will be held in confidence to the extent required by the
provisions of the confidentiality agreement between Cliffs and
Alpha.
Cooperation;
Regulatory, Antitrust and Other Required Approvals and
Clearances
Cliffs and Alpha have each agreed to use their reasonable best
efforts to cooperate and to take, or cause to be taken, all
actions necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make
effective the merger and the other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement, in the most expeditious manner
practicable. This includes:
|
|
|
|
|
obtaining all necessary actions or nonactions, waivers,
clearances, consents and approvals from governmental entities
and making all necessary registrations and filings and taking
all reasonable steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval
or waiver from, or to avoid an action or proceeding by, any
governmental entity;
|
|
|
|
obtaining all necessary consents, approvals or waivers from
third parties;
|
|
|
|
preventing the entry, enactment or promulgation of any
injunction or order or law that could materially and adversely
affect the ability of Cliffs and Alpha to consummate the
transactions under the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
seeking the lifting or rescission of any injunction or order or
law that could materially and adversely affect the ability of
the parties hereto to consummate the transactions under the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
cooperating to defend against any proceeding or investigation
relating to the merger agreement or the transactions
contemplated thereby and to cooperate to defend against it and
respond thereto;
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
executing and delivering any additional instruments necessary to
complete the merger and the other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement and to fully carry out the purposes of the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
using commercially reasonable efforts to arrange for
Alphas independent accountants to provide such comfort
letters, consents and other services that are reasonably
required in connection with Cliffs financings of the cash
consideration; and
|
|
|
|
assisting in the marketing and sale or any other syndication of
any such financings by making appropriate officers of Alpha
available for due diligence meetings and for participation in
the road show and meetings with prospective participants in such
financings upon reasonable notice and at reasonable times.
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Cliffs has agreed to promptly
reimburse Alpha for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by, and
otherwise indemnify and hold harmless, Alpha, its affiliates and
its and their respective officers, directors, accountants and
representatives from and against all liabilities listed in the
ultimate and penultimate bullet points above relating to such
actions other than those arising from such persons willful
misconduct or gross negligence.
For purposes of the merger agreement, reasonable best efforts
does not require the parties to sell, hold separate or otherwise
dispose of or conduct the business of Alpha, Cliffs
and/or any
of their respective affiliates in a manner which would resolve
any objections or suits that could materially and adversely
affect the ability of the parties to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement (or agree to or permit any
of these actions), except to the extent any such action would
not reasonably be expected to materially impair the benefits
each of Cliffs and Alpha reasonably expects to be derived from
the combination of Cliffs and Alpha through the merger.
In connection with the efforts referenced above to obtain all
requisite approvals and authorizations for the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement under the HSR Act, and to
obtain all such approvals and authorizations under any other
applicable antitrust law, each of Cliffs and Alpha has further
agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
cooperate in all respects with each other in connection with any
filing or submission and in connection with any investigation or
other inquiry, including any proceeding initiated by a private
party;
|
|
|
|
keep the other party informed in all material respects of any
material communication (and if in writing, provide a copy of
such communication) received by such party from, or given by
such party to, the FTC, the Antitrust Division or any other
governmental entity and of any material communication received
or given in connection with any proceeding by a private party,
in each case regarding any of the transactions contemplated in
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
permit the other party to review any material communication
given by it to, and consult with each other in advance of any
meeting or conference with, any such governmental entity or in
connection with any proceeding by a private party;
|
|
|
|
consult and cooperate with the other party and consider in good
faith the views of the other party in connection with any
analyses, appearances, presentations, memoranda, briefs,
arguments, opinions or proposals made or submitted by or on
behalf of Alpha, Cliffs or any of their respective affiliates to
any such governmental entity or private party; and
|
|
|
|
not participate in any substantive meeting or have any
substantive communication with any governmental entity unless it
has given the other parties a reasonable opportunity to consult
with it in advance and, to the extent permitted by such
governmental entity, gives the other the opportunity to attend
and participate therein.
|
In connection with and without limiting these obligations, each
of Cliffs and Alpha will take all action necessary to ensure
that no state takeover statute or similar statute or regulation
is or becomes applicable to the merger agreement or any
transaction contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
merger. If any state takeover statute or similar statute or
regulation becomes applicable to the merger agreement or any
transaction contemplated by the merger agreement, each of Cliffs
and Alpha will take all action necessary to ensure that the
106
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, may be completed as promptly as
practicable on the terms contemplated by the merger agreement
and otherwise to minimize the effect of the statute or
regulation on the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger.
Cliffs and merger sub have each acknowledged and agreed that
their obligations to consummate the merger and the other
transactions contemplated thereby are not conditioned or
contingent upon receipt of any financing.
Effect
of the Merger on Alpha Equity Awards
At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding Alpha
stock option and stock plan will be assumed by Cliffs. To the
extent provided under the terms of Alphas stock plans, all
outstanding options will accelerate and become immediately
exercisable in connection with the merger. Except for
acceleration in accordance with the terms of Alphas stock
plans, each Alpha stock option assumed by Cliffs will continue
to have the same terms and conditions as were applicable
immediately before the effective time of the merger, except that
each Alpha stock option will be exercisable for a number of
whole common shares of Cliffs equal to the product of the number
of shares of Alpha common stock issuable upon exercise of the
option immediately before the effective time of the merger
multiplied by the sum of (1) the stock consideration plus
(2) the cash consideration divided by the closing price for
a common share of Cliffs as reported on the NYSE Composite
Transaction Reports (as reported in The Wall Street Journal, or,
if not reported therein, any other authoritative sources) on the
closing date of the merger. In addition, the per share exercise
price of each Alpha stock option will be equal to the quotient
determined by dividing the per share exercise price of the Alpha
stock option by the sum of (1) the stock consideration plus
(2) the cash consideration divided by the closing price for
a common share of Cliffs as reported on the NYSE Composite
Transaction Reports (as reported in The Wall Street Journal, or,
if not reported therein, any other authoritative sources) on the
closing date of the merger.
The conversion of any Alpha stock options which are
incentive stock options, within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Code, into options to purchase Cliffs
common shares will be made so as not to constitute a
modification of those Alpha stock options within the
meaning of Section 424 of the Code.
Cliffs will take all corporate action necessary to reserve for
issuance a sufficient number of common shares of Cliffs for
delivery upon exercise or settlement of the Alpha stock plans
described above that it will assume or settle pursuant to the
merger agreement. As soon as practicable after the effective
time of the merger, Cliffs will file a registration statement on
Form S-8,
or other appropriate form, with respect to the common shares of
Cliffs subject to the Alpha stock plans and will maintain the
effectiveness of such registration statement and maintain the
current status of the prospectus or prospectuses contained in
such registration statement, for so long as the Alpha stock
options assumed by Cliffs remain outstanding.
At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding unvested
share of restricted Alpha common stock issued under an Alpha
stock plan will become vested and no longer subject to
restrictions, and as a result will be treated in the merger as
unrestricted Alpha common stock.
At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding
performance share granted under Alpha stock plans will vest
according to the terms of the applicable performance share
agreement, and the holder of each performance share agreement
will be entitled to receive an amount in cash equal to the
product of (i) the sum of (A) the cash consideration
plus (B) the product of the stock consideration multiplied
by the closing price, multiplied by (ii) the number of
shares of Alpha common stock that would be issuable under such
performance share agreement.
Indemnification
and Insurance
Cliffs has agreed that all rights to indemnification and
exculpation, from liabilities for acts or omissions occurring at
or prior to the effective time of the merger (including any
matters arising in connection with the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement) existing in favor of the current or
former directors, officers and employees of Alpha and its
subsidiaries, as provided in their respective certificates of
incorporation, by-laws or in any agreement between Alpha or its
subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any current or former
director, officer or
107
employee of Alpha or its subsidiaries, on the other hand, will
be assumed by the surviving company and will survive the merger
and continue in full force and effect in accordance with their
terms.
Cliffs has agreed to maintain in effect, for at least six years
after the effective time of the merger, or to replace with a
six-year tail policy providing the same coverage in
all material respects, the Alpha directors and
officers liability insurance policies covering acts or
omissions occurring prior to the effective time of the merger
with respect to those persons who are currently covered by
Alphas directors and officers liability
insurance policies as of the date of the merger agreement on
terms with respect to such coverage and amount no less favorable
than those of such existing insurance coverage. However, Cliffs
or the surviving company will not be required to expend in any
one year an amount in excess of 300% of the annual premiums paid
by Alpha at the date of the merger agreement for the insurance;
if the annual premiums exceed that amount, Cliffs will be
obligated to obtain a policy with the greatest coverage
available for a cost not exceeding the limit set forth above.
Alpha
Employee Benefits Matters
Cliffs agreed to assume all of the Alpha benefit plans and honor
and pay or provide the benefits required under the plans,
recognizing that the consummation of the merger or approval of
the merger agreement by Alphas stockholders, as the case
may be, will constitute a change in control for
purposes of each such plan that includes a definition of
change in control.
With respect to any Alpha common stock held by any Alpha benefit
plan as of the date of the merger agreement or thereafter, Alpha
agreed to take all actions necessary or appropriate (including
such actions as are reasonably requested by Cliffs) to ensure
that all participant voting procedures contained in the Alpha
benefit plans relating to such shares, and all applicable
provisions of ERISA, are complied with in full.
For the period commencing at the effective time of the merger
and ending on the second anniversary thereof, Cliffs agreed to
cause to be maintained on behalf of employees of Alpha at the
effective time of the merger other than individuals covered by a
collective bargaining agreement, considered as a group,
compensation opportunities and employee benefits that are
substantially comparable, in the aggregate, to the compensation
opportunities and employee benefits provided by Alpha or its
subsidiaries, as applicable.
Employees of Alpha immediately before the effective time of the
merger who are provided benefits under Cliffs employee benefit
plans after the merger will receive credit for their service
with Alpha and its affiliates before the effective time of the
merger for purposes of eligibility, vesting and benefit accrual
(other than benefit accrual under a Cliffs defined benefit plan)
to the same extent as they were entitled, before the effective
time of the merger, to credit for service under any similar or
comparable Alpha benefit plan.
For purposes of each Cliffs benefit plan providing medical,
dental or health benefits to any Alpha employee described above,
Cliffs agreed to cause all pre-existing condition limitations
and exclusions and all actively-at-work requirements of the plan
to be waived for the employee and his or her covered dependents
(but only to the extent that the limitations, exclusions and
requirements would have been waived (or inapplicable) under the
comparable Alpha benefit plan). Cliffs also agreed to cause any
eligible expenses incurred by the employee and his or her
covered dependents during the portion of the plan year of the
Alpha plan ending on the date the employees participation
in the corresponding Cliffs plan begins to be taken into account
under the Cliffs plan for purposes of satisfying all deductible,
coinsurance and maximum out-of-pocket requirements applicable to
the employee and his or her covered dependents for the
applicable plan year as if the amounts had been paid in
accordance with the Cliffs plan.
Dissenters
Rights of Cliffs Shareholders
Cliffs has agreed to give Alpha prompt notice of any demands
received by Cliffs for the fair cash value of Cliffs common
shares from those Cliffs shareholders who choose to exercise
their dissenters rights under the Ohio General Corporation
Law (see Annex E to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus for the full text of Section 1701.85
of the Ohio General Corporation Law governing dissenters
rights). Cliffs has also agreed (i) not to, without the
prior written consent of Alpha, waive any requirement under or
compliance with the provisions of the Ohio General Corporation
Law applicable to any shareholder of Cliffs demanding the fair
cash value of his, her or its shares of Cliffs and (ii) to
require each such shareholder holding shares of Cliffs in
certificated form to deliver such shares to
108
Cliffs, and to endorse on such shares a legend to the effect
that a demand for the fair cash value of such shares has been
made.
Additional
Agreements
The merger agreement contains additional agreements between
Cliffs and Alpha relating to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
preparation of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and of the
registration statement on
Form S-4,
of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part;
|
|
|
|
tax treatment of the merger, and cooperation with respect to
obtaining opinions from outside counsel that the merger will
constitute a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code;
|
|
|
|
consultations regarding public announcements;
|
|
|
|
use of reasonable best efforts by Cliffs to cause the common
shares of Cliffs to be issued in the merger to be approved for
listing on the NYSE;
|
|
|
|
standstill agreements;
|
|
|
|
confidentiality agreements;
|
|
|
|
ensure exemption under
Rule 16b-3
of the Exchange Act;
|
|
|
|
if Cliffs so requests, a tender offer by Alpha to repurchase
Alphas 2.375% Convertible Senior Notes due
2015; and
|
|
|
|
a payoff letter under Alphas existing credit facility.
|
Conditions
to Completion of the Merger
The obligations of Cliffs, merger sub, and Alpha to complete the
merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver on or prior to
the closing date of the merger of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement by the Alpha stockholders at
the Alpha special meeting;
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the issuance of
Cliffs common shares pursuant to the terms of the merger
agreement by the Cliffs shareholders at the Cliffs special
meeting;
|
|
|
|
expiration or termination of the waiting period (including any
extension thereof) applicable to the consummation of the merger
under the HSR Act and receipt of antitrust clearance in Turkey;
|
|
|
|
making or obtaining all other consents, approvals and actions
of, filings with and notices to any governmental entity required
to consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement, the failure of which to be made or
obtained is reasonably expected to have or result in,
individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on
Cliffs or Alpha;
|
|
|
|
absence of any judgment, order, decree or law entered, enacted,
promulgated, enforced or issued by any court or other
governmental entity of competent jurisdiction or other legal
restraint or prohibition that is in effect and prevents the
consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
continued effectiveness of the registration statement on Form
S-4 of which
this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part and absence
of any stop order by the SEC or proceedings seeking a stop
order, suspending the effectiveness of such registration
statement; and
|
|
|
|
approval for listing on the NYSE, upon official notice of
issuance, of the common shares of Cliffs to be issued in the
merger.
|
109
The obligation of Cliffs and merger sub to effect the merger is
further subject to satisfaction or waiver of the following
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Alpha set forth in the
merger agreement relating to the absence of a material adverse
effect on Alpha since December 31, 2007 must be true and
correct in all respects both as of the date of the merger
agreement and as of the closing date of the merger, as if made
at and as of the closing date of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Alpha set forth in the
merger agreement relating to the capital structure of Alpha must
be true and correct in all respects (except for any de minimis
inaccuracies);
|
|
|
|
all other representations and warranties of Alpha set forth in
the merger agreement must be true and correct in all respects
(without giving effect to any materiality or material adverse
effect qualifications contained in them), except where the
failure of such other representations and warranties to be so
true and correct would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on Alpha;
|
|
|
|
Alpha must have performed in all material respects all of its
obligations required to be performed by it under the merger
agreement at or prior to the closing date of the merger;
|
|
|
|
Alpha must have furnished Cliffs with a certificate dated the
closing date of the merger signed on its behalf by an executive
officer to the effect that the conditions set forth above in the
four immediately preceding bullets have been satisfied; and
|
|
|
|
Cliffs must have received from Jones Day, its counsel, an
opinion dated as of the closing date of the merger, to the
effect that the merger will constitute a reorganization within
the meeting of Section 368(a) of the Code.
|
The obligation of Alpha to effect the merger is further subject
to satisfaction or waiver of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Cliffs and merger sub set
forth in the merger agreement relating to the absence of a
material adverse effect on Cliffs since December 31, 2007
must be true and correct in all respects both as of the date of
the merger agreement and as of the closing date of the merger,
as if made at and as of the closing date of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Cliffs and merger sub set
forth in the merger agreement relating to the capital structure
of Cliffs must be true and correct in all respects (except for
any de minimis inaccuracies);
|
|
|
|
all other representations and warranties of Cliffs and merger
sub set forth in the merger agreement must be true and correct
in all respects (without giving effect to any materiality or
material adverse effect qualifications contained in them),
except where the failure of such other representations and
warranties to be so true and correct would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in, individually or in the aggregate,
a material adverse effect on Cliffs and merger sub;
|
|
|
|
Cliffs and merger sub must have performed in all material
respects all of its obligations required to be performed by it
under the merger agreement at or prior to the closing date of
the merger;
|
|
|
|
Cliffs and merger sub must have each furnished Alpha with a
certificate dated the closing date of the merger signed on its
behalf by an executive officer to the effect that the conditions
set forth above in the four immediately preceding bullets have
been satisfied; and
|
|
|
|
Alpha shall have received from Cleary Gottlieb, its counsel, an
opinion dated as of the closing date, to the effect that the
merger will constitute a reorganization within the meeting of
Section 368(a) of the Code.
|
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
At any time before the effective time of the merger, whether or
not the Alpha stockholders have adopted the merger agreement or
the Cliffs shareholders have adopted the merger agreement and
approved the issuance of Cliffs common shares in connection with
the merger, the merger agreement may be terminated:
|
|
|
|
|
by the mutual written consent of Cliffs and Alpha;
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
by either Cliffs or Alpha if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the parties fail to consummate the merger on or before
January 15, 2009, or such later date, if any, as Cliffs and
Alpha may agree, unless the failure to consummate the merger by
January 15, 2009 or such later date is the result of a
breach of the merger agreement by the party seeking the
termination or unless such party has not yet held its special
meeting; provided that if all conditions to the closing have
been fulfilled other than the making or obtaining of the
consents, approvals and actions of, filings with and notices to
the governmental entities required to consummate the merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the
failure of which to be made or obtained is reasonably expected
to have or result in a material adverse effect on Alpha or
Cliffs, and the expiration or termination of the applicable
waiting period under the HSR Act, the outside date will be
extended from January 15, 2009 to April 15, 2009;
|
|
|
|
the Cliffs special meeting has concluded, the shareholders of
Cliffs have voted, and the adoption of the merger agreement and
the approval by the Cliffs shareholders of the issuance of
common shares of Cliffs pursuant to the merger agreement was not
obtained; or
|
|
|
|
the Alpha special meeting has concluded, the stockholders of
Alpha have voted, and the adoption of the merger agreement by
the Alpha stockholders was not obtained; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs or merger sub breach their representations or warranties
or breach or fail to perform their covenants set forth in the
merger agreement, which breach or failure to perform results in
a failure of certain of the conditions to the completion of the
merger being satisfied and such breach or failure to perform is
not cured within 30 days after the receipt of written
notice thereof or is incapable of being cured by the outside
date;
|
|
|
|
prior to the receipt of its stockholders approval of the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement, Alpha (i) receives
an unsolicited written takeover proposal after the date of the
merger agreement that the Alpha board of directors determines in
its good faith judgment constitutes, or would reasonably be
expected to lead to, a superior proposal, (ii) provides
Cliffs with a written notice that it intends to take such
action, (iii) the Alpha board of directors determines in
good faith that failure to take such action would be reasonably
likely to be a violation of its fiduciary duties to Alpha
stockholders under applicable Delaware law, (iv) thereafter
satisfies the conditions for withdrawing (or modifying in a
manner adverse to Cliffs) the recommendation by its board of
directors of the merger or recommending such superior proposal,
and (v) concurrently with the termination of the merger
agreement, enters into an acquisition agreement with a third
party providing for the implementation of the transactions
contemplated by such superior proposal; provided that Alpha pays
a $350 million termination fee to Cliffs and such superior
proposal did not result from Alphas breach of its
non-solicitation obligations under the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
Cliffs materially breaches its covenants to convene the Cliffs
special meeting or breaches its obligations to recommend that
Cliffs shareholders vote in favor of the adoption of the merger
agreement and the issuance of common shares in connection with
the merger; or
|
|
|
|
the Cliffs board of directors or any committee thereof
(i) withdraws or modifies, or publicly proposes to withdraw
or modify, its recommendation that Cliffs shareholders adopt the
merger agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs common
shares in connection with the merger, or (ii) recommends,
adopts or approves, or proposes publicly to recommend, adopt or
approve certain transactions involving Cliffs; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha breaches its representations or warranties or breaches or
fails to perform its covenants in the merger agreement, which
breach or failure to perform results in a failure of certain of
the conditions to the completion of the merger being satisfied,
provided such breach or failure to perform is not cured within
30 days after receipt of a written notice thereof or is
incapable of being cured by the outside date;
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha materially breaches its obligations not to solicit
takeover proposals or materially breaches its covenants to
convene the Alpha special meeting or breaches its obligations to
recommend that Alpha stockholders vote in favor of adoption of
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the Alpha board of directors or any committee thereof
(i) withdraws or adversely modifies or publicly proposes to
withdraw or adversely modify, its recommendation of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, or (ii) recommends, adopts
or approves, or proposes publicly to recommend, adopt or approve
a takeover proposal other than the merger agreement; or
|
|
|
|
Alpha materially breaches its obligations not to solicit
takeover proposals or breaches certain of its obligations with
respect to holding its special meeting of stockholders.
|
Termination
Fees
Alpha must pay Cliffs a termination fee:
|
|
|
|
|
of $350 million if the merger agreement is terminated by
Cliffs because (a) Alpha has materially breached its
non-solicitation obligations under the merger agreement or has
materially breached its covenants to convene the Alpha special
meeting for the adoption of the merger agreement or has breached
it obligations to recommend that Alpha stockholders vote in
favor of such adoption or (b) the Alpha board of directors
or any committee thereof (i) withdraws or adversely
modifies or publicly proposes to withdraw or adversely modify,
its recommendation of the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, or
(ii) recommends, adopts or approves, or proposes publicly
to recommend, adopt or approve a takeover proposal other than
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
of $350 million if the merger agreement is terminated by
Alpha if, prior to the receipt of its stockholders approval of
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, Alpha
(i) receives an unsolicited superior proposal after the
date of the merger agreement, (ii) provides Cliffs with a
written notice that it intends to take such action,
(iii) the Alpha board of directors determines in good faith
that failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to
be a violation of its fiduciary duties to Alpha stockholders
under applicable Delaware law, (iv) thereafter satisfies
the conditions for withdrawing (or modifying in a manner adverse
to Cliffs) the recommendation by its board of directors of the
merger or recommending such superior proposal, and
(v) concurrently with the termination of the merger
agreement, enters into an acquisition agreement with a third
party providing for the implementation of the transactions
contemplated by such superior proposal; provided that such
superior proposal did not result from Alphas material
breach of its non-solicitation obligations under the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
of $350 million if the merger agreement is terminated
(i) because (x) the merger has not been consummated by
the outside date; (y) the Alpha special meeting has
concluded the stockholders of Alpha have voted and the adoption
of the merger agreement by the Alpha stockholders was not
obtained; or (z) Alpha breaches its representations or
warranties or breaches or fails to perform its covenants in the
merger agreement (other than its obligations described in clause
(a) of the first bullet above), which breach or failure to
perform results in a failure of certain of the conditions to the
completion of the merger being satisfied, provided such breach
or failure to perform is not cured within 30 days after
receipt of a written notice thereof or is incapable of being
cured by the outside date; (ii) prior to such termination,
any person publicly announces an alternative takeover proposal
relating to Alpha; and (iii) within 12 months of such
termination Alpha enters into a definitive agreement with
respect to, or consummates, an alternative takeover proposal
relating to Alpha; provided that the $350 million
termination fee will be payable by Alpha either (A) upon
consummation of the alternative takeover transaction or,
(B) if the alternative takeover transaction is not
consummated, upon the consummation of any other alternative
takeover transaction that closes within 24 months from the
entry into the definitive agreement for the first alternative
takeover transaction; or
|
|
|
|
of $100 million if the merger agreement is terminated
because the Alpha stockholders voted and did not adopt the
merger agreement (however, if the Cliffs shareholders voted and
did not adopt the merger
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs common shares
pursuant to the merger agreement, Alpha will not be required to
pay the $100 million termination fee).
|
Cliffs must pay Alpha a termination fee:
|
|
|
|
|
of $350 million if the merger agreement is terminated by
Alpha because (i) Cliffs has materially breached its
covenant to convene and hold the Cliffs special meeting to adopt
the merger agreement and approve the issuance of Cliffs shares
in the merger or has breached its covenant to recommend that
Cliffs shareholders vote in favor of adoption of the merger
agreement and issuance of Cliffs common shares in the merger or
(ii) the Cliffs board of directors or any committee thereof
has withdrawn or modified, or publicly proposed to withdraw or
modify, such recommendation;
|
|
|
|
of $350 million if the merger agreement is terminated by
either party because: (i) (A) the merger was not
consummated by the outside date; (B) Cliffs special meeting
has concluded, the shareholders of Cliffs have voted and the
adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
issuance of common shares of Cliffs pursuant to the merger
agreement by the Cliffs shareholders were not obtained; or
(C) Cliffs or merger sub breach their representations or
warranties or breach or fail to perform their covenants (other
than their obligations described in clause (i) of the first
bullet above) set forth in the merger agreement, which breach or
failure to perform results in a failure of certain of the
conditions to the completion of the merger being satisfied and
such breach or failure to perform is not cured within
30 days after the receipt of written notice thereof or is
incapable of being cured by the outside date; (ii) prior to
such termination, an alternative proposal concerning Cliffs and
meeting certain criteria outlined in the merger agreement that
is conditioned upon or designed to cause the termination or
failure of the merger or the merger agreement shall have been
made public; and (iii) within 12 months of such
termination Cliffs or any of the Cliffs subsidiaries
enters into a definitive agreement with respect to, or
consummates, any such alternative proposal; or
|
|
|
|
of $100 million if the merger agreement is terminated
because the Cliffs shareholders voted and did not adopt the
merger agreement and approve the issuance of common shares of
Cliffs pursuant to the merger agreement (however, if the Alpha
stockholders voted and did not adopt the merger agreement,
Cliffs will not be required to pay the $100 million
termination fee).
|
In general, each of Cliffs and Alpha will bear its own expenses
in connection with the merger agreement and the related
transactions except that Cliffs and Alpha will share equally the
costs and expenses in connection with filing, printing and
mailing of the registration statement and this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Amendments,
Extensions and Waivers
Amendments
The merger agreement may be amended by the parties at any time
prior to the effective time of the merger by an instrument in
writing signed on behalf of each of the parties. However, after
the adoption of the merger agreement at the Alpha special
meeting or the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of
the issuance of common shares of Cliffs in the merger at the
Cliffs special meeting, there will be no amendment to the merger
agreement made that by law, requires further approval by the
stockholders of Alpha or shareholders of Cliffs without the
further approval of the stockholders of Alpha or shareholders of
Cliffs.
Extensions
and Waivers
At any time prior to the effective time of the merger, any party
to the merger agreement may:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other parties;
|
|
|
|
waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties of
the other parties contained in the merger agreement or in any
document delivered pursuant to the merger agreement; or
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
waive compliance by the other parties with any of the agreements
or conditions contained in the merger agreement except as
limited by the provisions of the merger agreement described
above in the section Amendments.
|
Any agreement on the part of either party to any extension or
waiver will be valid only if set forth in an instrument in
writing signed by that party. The failure of any party to the
merger agreement to assert any of its rights under the merger
agreement or otherwise will not constitute a waiver of those
rights.
114
INFORMATION
ABOUT CLIFFS
References in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to
A$ are to Australian currency, C$ to
Canadian currency and $ to United States currency.
Additional information about Cliffs and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 239.
Business
General
Founded in 1847, Cliffs is an international mining company, the
largest producer of iron ore pellets in North America and a
major supplier of metallurgical coal to the global steelmaking
industry. Cliffs operates six iron ore mines in Michigan,
Minnesota and Eastern Canada, and three coking coal mines in
West Virginia and Alabama. Cliffs also owns a majority control
interest in Portman, a large iron ore mining company in
Australia, serving the Asian iron ore markets with
direct-shipping fines and lump ore. In addition, Cliffs has a
30 percent interest in Amapá, a Brazilian iron ore
project, and a 45 percent economic interest in Sonoma, an
Australian coking and thermal coal project.
Cliffs executive offices are located at 1100 Superior
Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio
44114-2544,
telephone number:
(216) 694-5700.
Strategic
Transformation
In recent years, Cliffs has undergone a strategic transformation
to an international mining company from its historic business
model as a mine manager for the integrated steel industry in
North America. Through a series of acquisitions and joint
venture partnerships, the transformation has included
Cliffs pursuit of geographic and mineral diversification,
with a focus on providing raw materials to the steelmaking
industry.
Prior to 2002, Cliffs primarily held a minority interest in the
mines it managed, with the majority interest in the mines held
by various North American steel companies. Cliffs earnings
were principally comprised of royalties and management fees paid
by the partnerships, along with sales of Cliffs equity
share of the mine pellet production. Faced with marked
deterioration in the financial condition of many of its partners
and customers, Cliffs embarked on a strategy to reposition
itself from a manager of iron ore mines on behalf of steel
company partners to primarily a merchant of iron ore through
increasing its ownership interests in Cliffs managed mines.
In 2004, Cliffs also significantly improved its liquidity
initially through its January, 2004 offering of
$172.5 million of
Series A-2
preferred stock. The proceeds from the issuance were utilized to
repay the remaining $25 million balance of Cliffs
unsecured notes and to fund $76.1 million into Cliffs
underfunded salaried and hourly pension funds and Voluntary
Employee Benefit Association trusts. Additionally, the proceeds
from the sale of International Steel Group, Inc. stock and cash
flow from operations provided Cliffs with the liquidity for
capital expenditures to maintain and expand its production
capacity and to complete the acquisition of Portman.
In April 2005, Cliffs completed the acquisition of an
80.4 percent interest in Portman. The acquisition increased
Cliffs customer base in China and Japan and established
Cliffs presence in the Australian mining industry. On
May 21, 2008, Portman authorized a tender offer to
repurchase up to 16.5 million shares, or 9.39 percent
of its common stock. Cliffs indicated that it would not
participate in the repurchase of shares pursuant to the tender
offer. The tender period closed on June 24, 2008. Under the
repurchase of shares pursuant to the tender offer,
9.8 million fully paid ordinary shares were tendered at a
price of A$14.66 per share. As a result of the repurchase of
shares pursuant to the tender offer, Cliffs ownership
interest in Portman increased from 80.4 percent to
85.2 percent. In order to enable Cliffs to move to full
ownership of Portman, on September 10, 2008, Cliffs
announced an off-market takeover offer to acquire, through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Cliffs Asia-Pacific Pty Limited, all of
the shares in Portman that Cliffs does not already own. The
offer is a last and final cash offer at a price of A$21.50 per
Portman share. As of October 21, 2008, Cliffs had received
such number of the offer acceptances that effectively increased
Cliffs ownership interest in Portman to
94.69 percent, thereby allowing Cliffs to proceed under
Australian takeover laws with compulsory acquisition of the
remaining Portman shares.
In March 2007, Cliffs acquired a 30 percent interest in
Amapá. The remaining 70 percent of Amapá was
owned by MMX Minerção e Metalicos S.A., or MMX. On
August 5, 2008,
Anglo-American
plc acquired a controlling interest in MMXs current
51 percent interest in the Minas-Rio iron ore project and
its 70 percent interest in Amapá.
115
In April 2007, Cliffs completed the acquisition of a
45 percent economic interest in Sonoma in Queensland,
Australia.
In June 2007, Cliffs entered into an alliance whereby Kobe
Steel, LTD., or Kobe Steel, agreed to license its patented
ITmk3®
iron-making technology to Cliffs. The alliance, which has a
10-year
term, provides Cliffs a technology to convert its low-grade iron
ore reserves to high-purity iron nuggets that can be used in an
electric arc furnace, a market in which Cliffs does not
currently compete.
In July 2007, Cliffs completed its acquisition of PinnOak, a
privately-owned U.S. mining company with three
high-quality, low-volatile metallurgical coal mines. The
acquisition furthered Cliffs growth strategy and expanded
its diversification of products for the integrated steel
industry.
In November 2007, Cliffs acquired a 70 percent controlling
interest in Renewafuel, LLC, or Renewafuel. Founded in 2005,
Renewafuel produces high-quality, dense fuel cubes made from
renewable and consistently available components such as corn
stalks, switch grass, grains, soybean and oat hulls, wood, and
wood byproducts. During the second quarter of 2008, Renewafuel
announced it would build a next-generation biomass fuel
production facility at the Telkite Technology Park in Marquette,
Michigan. Projected to begin operations in the first quarter of
2009, the plant would annually produce 150,000 tons of
high-energy, low-emission biofuel cubes from a sustainable
composite of collected wood and agricultural feedstocks,
including wood byproducts, corn stalks, grasses and energy crops.
In 2008, Portman acquired 24 million shares of Golden West
Resources Ltd, a Western Australia iron ore exploration company
referred to as Golden West representing approximately
17.6 percent of its outstanding shares. Acquisition of the
shares represents an investment of approximately
$27 million. Golden West owns the Wiluna West exploration
ore project in Western Australia, containing a resource of
119 million metric tons of ore. The purchase provides
Portman a strategic interest in Golden West and its Wiluna West
exploration ore project.
On July 11, 2008, Cliffs signed and closed on the
acquisition of the remaining 30 percent interest in United
Taconite, with an effective date of July 1, 2008. Upon
consummation of the purchase, Cliffs ownership interest in
United Taconite increased from 70 percent to
100 percent. Consideration paid for the acquisition was a
combination of approximately $100 million in cash,
approximately 4.3 million of Cliffs common shares, and
1.2 million tons of iron ore pellets to be provided
throughout 2008 and 2009. The consolidation of the United
Taconite minority interest, together with Cliffs
Northshore property, represents two wholly-owned iron ore assets
of Cliffs in North America.
On July 12, 2008, Cliffs announced a capital expansion
project at its Empire and Tilden mines in Michigans Upper
Peninsula. The project, which requires approximately
$290.4 million of incremental capital investment, is
expected to allow the Empire mine to produce at three million
tons annually through 2017 and increase Tilden mine production
by more than two million tons annually. This incremental
production is expected to result in total equity production of
over 23 million tons annually for the North American Iron
Ore segment of Cliffs. Empire was previously projected to
exhaust reserves in early 2011. As part of the capacity
expansion, Cliffs will also mine additional ore from its Tilden
mine, located adjacent to Empire, and process it utilizing
additional processing capacity at Empire. Utilization of this
capacity will enable Tilden to increase production to more than
10 million tons annually, of which 8.5 million tons
represent Cliffs share. The work is expected to begin in
the last quarter of 2008, with capital expenditures of
$69 million, $161.5 million and $59.9 million
projected in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
In July 2008, Cliffs also incurred an additional capital
commitment for the purchase of a new longwall plow system at
Cliffs Pinnacle mine in West Virginia. The equipment,
which requires a capital investment of approximately
$90 million, will replace the current longwall plow system
in an effort to reduce maintenance costs and increase production
at the mine. Capital expenditures related to this purchase will
be made in 2008 and 2009, with the equipment expected to be
delivered in 2009.
On September 11, 2008, Cliffs, through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Cliffs Australia Holdings Pty Ltd, announced a
strategic alliance and subscription and option agreement with a
diversified Australian exploration company, AusQuest Limited, or
AusQuest. Under the agreement reached, Cliffs will acquire a
30 percent fully diluted interest in AusQuest through a
staged issue of shares and options. Subject to AusQuests
shareholders and Australian Foreign Investment Review Board
approval, Cliffs will make an initial A$26 million
subscription at A$0.40 per share and appoint a representative to
the AusQuest board. This strategic alliance provides Cliffs with
116
both the right to support AusQuests future raising of
capital, as well as certain rights in relation to any future
sale or other disposal of AusQuests explorative assets.
This investment and formation of a strategic alliance supports
Cliffs continued growth strategy to expand internationally.
For more information, see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
Cliffs Growth Strategy and Strategic
Transactions beginning on page 145.
Business
Segments
In the past, Cliffs evaluated segment results based on segment
operating income. As a result of the PinnOak acquisition and
Cliffs focus on reducing production costs, Cliffs now
evaluates segment performance based on sales margin, defined as
revenues less cost of goods sold identifiable to each segment.
Cliffs is currently organized into three reportable business
segments: North America Iron Ore, North American Coal and
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore. Additional operating segments that do not
meet the criteria for reporting segments are the Latin American
Iron Ore and Asia-Pacific Coal businesses, which are in the
early stages of production. See Note 6 of the Cliffs
unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for the
six months ended June 30, 2008, included elsewhere in this
joint proxy
statement/prospectus,
for further information.
North
American Iron Ore
Cliffs is the largest producer of iron ore pellets in North
America and sells virtually all of its production to integrated
steel companies in the United States and Canada. Cliffs manages
and operates six North American iron ore mines located in
Michigan, Minnesota and Eastern Canada that currently have a
rated capacity of 36.5 million tons of iron ore pellet
production annually, representing approximately 45 percent
of total North American pellet production capacity. Based on
Cliffs percentage ownership of the North American
mines Cliffs operates, its share of the rated pellet production
capacity is currently 24.0 million tons annually,
representing approximately 29.6 percent of total North
American annual pellet capacity.
The following chart summarizes the estimated annual production
capacity and percentage of total North American pellet
production capacity for each of the North American iron ore
pellet producers as of June 30, 2008:
117
North
American Iron Ore Pellet
Annual Rated Capacity Tonnage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Estimated
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
North American Capacity
|
|
|
|
(Gross Tons of Raw Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Cliffs managed mines
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
Other U.S. mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Steels Minnesota ore operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota Taconite
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
Keewatin Taconite
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Steel
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
ArcelorMittal USA Minorca mine
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other U.S. mines
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
Other Canadian mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Ore Company of Canada
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
ArcelorMittal Mines Canada
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other Canadian mines
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North American mines
|
|
|
81.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs sells its share of North American iron ore production to
integrated steel producers, generally pursuant to term supply
agreements with various price adjustment provisions.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, Cliffs produced a
total of 34.6 million tons of iron ore pellets, including
21.8 million tons for Cliffs account and
12.8 million tons on behalf of steel company owners of the
mines. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, Cliffs
produced a total of 18.0 million tons of iron ore pellets,
including 11.5 million tons for Cliffs account and
6.5 million tons on behalf of steel company owners of the
mines.
Cliffs produces 13 grades of iron ore pellets, including
standard, fluxed and high manganese, for use in Cliffs
customers blast furnaces as part of the steelmaking
process. The variation in grades results from the specific
chemical and metallurgical properties of the ores at each mine
and whether or not fluxstone is added in the process. Although
the grade or grades of pellets currently delivered to each
customer are based on that customers preferences, which
depend in part on the characteristics of the customers
blast furnace operation, in many cases Cliffs iron ore
pellets can be used interchangeably. Industry demand for the
various grades of iron ore pellets depends on each
customers preferences and changes from time to time. In
the event that a given mine is operating at full capacity, the
terms of most of Cliffs pellet supply agreements allow
some flexibility to provide Cliffs customers iron ore
pellets from different mines.
Standard pellets require less processing, are generally the
least costly pellets to produce and are called
standard because no ground fluxstone (i.e.,
limestone, dolomite, etc.) is added to the iron ore concentrate
before turning the concentrates into pellets. In the case of
fluxed pellets, fluxstone is added to the concentrate, which
produces pellets that can perform at higher productivity levels
in the customers specific blast furnace and will minimize
the amount of fluxstone the customer may be required to add to
the blast furnace. High manganese pellets are the
pellets produced at Cliffs Canadian Wabush Mines Joint
Venture, or Wabush, operation where there is more natural
manganese in the crude ore than is found at Cliffs, other
operations. The manganese contained in the iron ore mined at
Wabush cannot be entirely removed during the concentrating
process. Wabush produces pellets with two levels of manganese,
both in standard and fluxed grades.
It is not possible to produce pellets with identical physical
and chemical properties from each of Cliffs mining and
processing operations. The grade or grades of pellets purchased
by and delivered to each customer are based on that
customers preferences and availability.
118
Each of Cliffs North American iron ore mines are located
near the Great Lakes or, in the case of Wabush, near the St.
Lawrence Seaway, which is connected to the Great Lakes. The
majority of Cliffs iron ore pellets are transported via
railroads to loading ports for shipment via vessel to
steelmakers in the U.S. or Canada.
North
American Iron Ore Customers
Cliffs North American Iron Ore revenues are derived from
sales of iron ore pellets to the North American integrated
steel industry, consisting of eight customers. Generally, Cliffs
has multi-year supply agreements with its customers. Sales
volume under these agreements is largely dependent on customer
requirements, and in many cases, Cliffs is the sole supplier of
iron ore pellets to the customer. Each agreement has a base
price that is adjusted annually using one or more adjustment
factors. Factors that can adjust price include international
pellet prices, measures of general industrial inflation and
steel prices. One of Cliffs supply agreements has a
provision that limits the amount of price increase or decrease
in any given year.
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, Cliffs sold 22.3 million,
20.4 million and 22.3 million tons of iron ore
pellets, respectively, from its share of the production from its
North American iron ore mines. The following five customers
together accounted for a total of 83, 91 and 93 percent of
North American Iron Ore Revenues from product sales and services
for the years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Sales
|
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
Customer
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ArcelorMittal USA
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Algoma Steel Inc., or Algoma
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Severstal North America, Inc. or, Severstal
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
U.S. Steel Canada
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
WCI Steel Inc.
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excluding freight and venture partners cost reimbursements. |
North
American Iron Ore Term Supply Agreements
Cliffs term supply agreements in North America expire
between the end of 2011 and the end of 2022. The weighted
average remaining duration is eight years.
Cliffs North American Iron Ore sales are influenced by
seasonal factors in the first quarter of the year as shipments
and sales are restricted by weather conditions on the Great
Lakes. During the first quarter, Cliffs continues to produce its
products, but it cannot ship those products via lake freighter
until the Great Lakes are passable, which causes Cliffs
first quarter inventory levels to rise. Cliffs limited
practice of shipping product to ports on the lower Great Lakes
and/or to
customers facilities prior to the transfer of title has
somewhat mitigated the seasonal effect on first quarter
inventories and sales. At both December 31, 2007 and 2006,
Cliffs had approximately 0.8 million tons of pellets in
inventory at lower lakes or customers facilities.
ArcelorMittal
USA
On March 19, 2007, Cliffs executed an umbrella agreement
with ArcelorMittal USA that covers significant price and volume
matters under three separate pre-existing iron ore pellet supply
agreements for ArcelorMittal USAs Cleveland and Indiana
Harbor West, Indiana Harbor East and Weirton Steel Corporation,
or Weirton, facilities. This umbrella agreement formalizes a
previously disclosed letter agreement dated April 12, 2006.
Under terms of the umbrella agreement, some of the terms of the
separate pellet sale and purchase agreements for each of the
above facilities were modified to aggregate ArcelorMittal
USAs purchases during the years 2006 through 2010. The
pricing provisions of the umbrella agreement are determined in
accordance with the individual supply agreements that were in
place for each of the facilities at the time it was executed.
119
During 2006 through 2010, ArcelorMittal USA is obligated to
purchase specified minimum tonnages of iron ore pellets on an
aggregate basis. The umbrella agreement also sets the minimum
annual tonnage at ArcelorMittal USAs approximately
budgeted usage levels through 2010, with pricing based on the
facility to which the pellets are delivered. Beginning in 2007,
the terms of the umbrella agreement allow ArcelorMittal USA to
manage its ore inventory levels through buydown provisions,
which permit it to reduce its tonnage purchase obligation each
year at a specified price per ton, and through deferral
provisions, which permit ArcelorMittal USA to defer a portion of
its annual tonnage purchase obligation beginning in 2007.
ArcelorMittal USA has opted to defer the purchase of 550,000
tons from 2007 to 2008. The umbrella agreement also provides for
consistent nomination procedures through 2010 across all three
iron ore pellet supply agreements.
If, at the end of the umbrella agreement term in 2010, a new
agreement is not executed, Cliffs pellet supply agreements
with ArcelorMittal USA prior to executing the umbrella agreement
will again become the basis for supplying pellets to
ArcelorMittal USA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement
|
|
Facility
|
|
Runs through
|
|
|
Cleveland Works and Indiana Harbor West facilities
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Indiana Harbor East facility
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Weirton facility
|
|
|
2018
|
|
In 2005, ArcelorMittal USA shut down
ArcelorMittal-Weirtons blast furnace. The Weirton Contract
had a minimum annual purchase obligation from
ArcelorMittal-Weirton to purchase iron ore pellets for the years
2006 through and including 2018, with a minimum annual purchase
obligation of two million tons per year. The
ArcelorMittal-Weirton blast furnace has been permanently shut
down and to the best of Cliffs knowledge will not be
restarted. The umbrella agreement eliminated the Weirton minimum
purchase obligation.
ArcelorMittal USA is a 62.3 percent equity participant in
Hibbing and a 21 percent equity partner in Empire with
limited rights and obligations and a 28.6 percent
participant in Wabush through an affiliate of ArcelorMittal USA,
ArcelorMittal Dofasco Inc. (formerly Dofasco Inc.), or Dofasco.
In 2007, 2006 and 2005, Cliffs North American Iron Ore
pellet sales to ArcelorMittal USA were 10.3, 9.1, and
10.7 million tons, respectively.
Algoma
Algoma, is a Canadian steelmaker and a subsidiary of Essar Steel
Holdings Limited. Cliffs has a
15-year term
supply agreement under which Cliffs is Algomas sole
supplier of iron ore pellets through 2016. Cliffs annual
obligation is capped at four million tons with Cliffs
option to supply additional pellets. Pricing under the agreement
with Algoma is based on a formula which includes international
pellet prices. The agreement also provides that, in 2008, 2011
and 2014, either party may request a price negotiation if prices
under the agreement with Algoma differ from a specified
benchmark price. On January 3, 2008, Algoma requested price
renegotiation for 2008. On May 30, 2008, four subsidiaries
of Cliffs entered into a binding term sheet with Algoma amending
the term supply agreement. The term sheet governs the
performance of the parties under the agreement (as amended by
the term sheet) until such time as the parties execute a
definitive written agreement. The term sheet establishes the
price for 2008 and provides for the sale of additional tonnage
to Algoma for 2008 and 2009. Pricing for 2009 and beyond will be
determined in accordance with the original terms of the
agreement with Algoma. In June 2007, Essar Global Limited,
through its wholly-owned subsidiary Essar Steel Holdings
Limited, completed its acquisition of Algoma for
C$1.85 billion. Cliffs does not expect the acquisition to
affect its term supply agreement with Algoma. Cliffs sold
2.9 million, 3.5 million and 3.8 million tons to
Algoma in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Severstal
In January 2006, Cliffs entered into an Amended and Restated
Pellet Sale and Purchase Agreement dated and effective
January 1, 2006, whereby Cliffs is the sole supplier of
iron ore pellets through 2012 to Severstal. The agreement with
Severstal contains certain minimum purchase requirements for
certain years. Cliffs sold 3.0 million, 3.7 million
and 3.6 million tons to Severstal in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
120
On January 5, 2008, Severstal experienced an explosion and
fire on the smaller of its two operating furnaces that partially
curtailed production at their North American facility.
On April 30, 2008, certain subsidiaries of Cliffs entered
into a binding term sheet with Severstal regarding an amendment
and extension of the agreement with Severstal. The term sheet
governs the performance of the parties under the agreement until
such time as the parties execute a definitive written agreement.
Pursuant to the term sheet, the term of the agreement with
Severstal is fifteen years, subject to automatic renewals unless
terminated by prior written notice. The agreement provides that
Cliffs must supply all of Severstals blast furnace pellet
requirements for its Dearborn, Michigan facility during the term
of the agreement, subject to specified minimum and maximum
requirements in certain years.
WCI
Steel Inc.
On October 14, 2004, Cliffs and WCI Steel Inc., or WCI,
reached agreement for Cliffs to supply 1.4 million tons of
iron ore pellets in 2005 and, in 2006 and thereafter, to supply
100 percent of WCIs annual requirements up to a
maximum of two million tons of iron ore pellets. The 2004
agreement is for a ten-year term, which commenced on
January 1, 2005.
On May 1, 2006, an entity controlled by the secured
noteholders of WCI acquired the steelmaking assets and business
of WCI. The new WCI assumed the 2004 agreement. Cliffs sold
1.5 million, 1.6 million and 1.4 million tons to
WCI (and its successor) in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
U.S.
Steel Canada
Inc.
U.S. Steel Canada is a 44.6 percent participant in
Wabush, and U.S. subsidiaries of U.S. Steel Canada own
14.7 percent of Hibbing and 15 percent of Tilden.
In December 2006, Cliffs executed a binding pellet supply term
sheet with U.S. Steel Canada with respect to a seven-year
supply agreement to provide their Lake Erie Steel and Hamilton
Steel facilities excess pellet requirements above the amount
supplied from their ownership interest at Hibbing, Tilden and
Wabush. Pellet sales to U.S. Steel Canada totaled
1.2 million, 0.9 million and 1.4 million tons in
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
North
American Coal
Cliffs is a supplier of metallurgical coal in North America.
Cliffs owns and operates three North American coal mines located
in West Virginia and Alabama that currently have a rated
capacity of 6.5 million short tons of production annually.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, Cliffs sold a total
of 1.6 million tons.
All three of Cliffs North American coal mines are
positioned near rail or barge lines providing access to
international shipping ports, which allows for export of
Cliffs coal production.
North
American Coal Customers
North American Coals production is sold to global
integrated steel and coke producers in Europe,
South America and North America. Approximately
90 percent of Cliffs 2008 production is committed
under one-year contracts. Customer contracts in North America
typically are negotiated on a calendar year basis with
international contracts negotiated as of March 31.
Exports and domestic sales represented 66 percent and
34 percent, respectively, of Cliffs
North American Coal sales in 2007.
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Cliffs Asia-Pacific Iron Ore segment is comprised of a
majority control interest in Portman, an Australian iron ore
mining company. The minority interest ownership of the company
is publicly held and traded on the Australian Stock Exchange
under the ticker symbol PMM, however, Cliffs
announced on September 10, 2008 an off-market
121
takeover offer to acquire, through its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Cliffs Asia-Pacific Pty Limited, all of the shares in Portman
that Cliffs does not already own.
Portmans operations are in Western Australia and include
its 100 percent owned Koolyanobbing mine and its
50 percent equity interest in Cockatoo Island Joint
Venture, which is referred to as Cockatoo Island. Portman serves
the Asian iron ore markets with direct-shipping fines and lump
ore. Production in 2007 (excluding its 0.7 million tonne
share of Cockatoo Island) was 7.7 million tonnes.
These two operations supply a total of four direct shipping
export products to Asia via the global seaborne trade market.
Koolyanobbing produces a standard lump and fines product as well
as low grade fines product. Cockatoo Island produces and exports
a single premium fines product. Portman lump products are
directly charged to the blast furnace, while the fines products
are used as sinter feed. The variation in Portmans four
export product grades reflects the inherent chemical and
physical characteristics of the ore bodies mined as well as the
supply requirements of the customers.
Koolyanobbing is a collective term for the operating deposits at
Koolyanobbing, Mount Jackson and Windarling. The project is
located 425 kilometers east of Perth and approximately 50
kilometers northeast of the town of Southern Cross. There are
approximately 100 kilometers separating the three mining areas.
Banded iron formation hosts the mineralization which is
predominately hematite and goethite. Each deposit is
characterized with different chemical and physical attributes
and in order to achieve customer product quality; ore in varying
quantities from each deposit must be blended together.
Blending is undertaken at Koolyanobbing, where the crushing and
screening plant is located. Standard and low grade products are
produced in separate campaigns. Once the blended ore has been
crushed and screened into a direct shipping product, it is
transported by rail approximately 575 kilometers south to the
Port of Esperance for shipment to Asian customers.
Cockatoo Island is located off the Kimberley coast of Western
Australia, approximately 1,900 kilometers north of Perth and is
only accessible by sea and air. Cockatoo Island produces a
single high iron product known as Cockatoo Island Premium Fines.
The deposit is almost pure hematite and contains very few
contaminants enabling the shipping grade to be above
68 percent iron. Ore is mined below the sea level on the
southern edge of the island. This is facilitated by a sea wall
which enables mining to a depth of 40 meters below sea level.
Ore is crushed and screened to the final product sizing. Vessels
berth at the island and the fines product is loaded directly to
the ship. Cockatoo Island Premium Fines are highly sought in the
global marketplace due to its extremely high iron grade and low
valueless mineral content. Cockatoo Island production ceased at
the end of the second quarter 2008, with shipments to continue
into the third quarter 2008. Construction on a necessary
extension of the existing seawall will commence in the third
quarter 2008, with production anticipated to restart by the end
of the second quarter 2009. This extension is expected to extend
production for approximately two additional years.
During the second quarter of 2008, Portman announced an
agreement with Polaris Metals NL and Southern Cross Goldfields
Limited, whereby Portman obtains non-magnetite iron ore rights
to a number of tenements in the Yilgarn region, in exchange for
unencumbered access by Polaris to the Bungalbin tenements.
Consequently, Portman no longer has any interest in the Helena
and Aurora Range and Bungalbin Hill areas. This arrangement will
permit tenement rationalization in immediate mining areas and
allow Portman to gain additional prospective exploration areas.
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore Customers
Portmans production is fully committed to steel companies
in China and Japan through 2012. A limited spot market exists
for seaborne iron ore as most production is sold under long-term
contracts with annual benchmark prices driven from negotiations
between the major suppliers and Chinese, Japanese and other
Asian steel mills.
Portman has long-term supply agreements with steel producers in
China and Japan that account for approximately 74 percent
and 26 percent, respectively, of sales. Sales volume under
the agreements is partially dependent on customer requirements.
Each agreement is priced based on benchmark pricing established
for Australian producers.
122
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, Cliffs sold 8.1 million,
7.4 million and 4.9 million tonnes of iron ore,
respectively, from its Western Australia mines. (Sales for 2005
represent amounts since the March 31, 2005 acquisition of
Portman).
Sales in 2007 were to 17 Chinese and three Japanese customers.
No customer comprised more than 15 percent of Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore sales or 10 percent of Cliffs consolidated
sales in 2007, 2006 or 2005. Portmans five largest
customers accounted for approximately 47 percent of
Portmans sales in 2007, 46 percent in 2006 and
50 percent in 2005.
Investments
In addition to Cliffs reportable business segments, Cliffs
is partner to a number of projects, including Amapá in
Brazil and Sonoma in Australia.
Amapá
Cliffs is a 30 percent minority interest owner in
Amapá, which consists of a significant iron ore deposit, a
192-kilometer
railway connecting the mine location to an existing port
facility and 71 hectares of real estate on the banks of the
Amazon River, reserved for a loading terminal. Amapá
initiated production in late-December 2007. Anglo-American,
Cliffs new partner in Amapá, has indicated that it plans to
complete construction of the concentrator and continue to
ramp-up
operations. It is estimated that Amapá will produce and
sell approximately one million tonnes of iron ore fines
products in 2008, down from a previous estimate of three million
tonnes. The majority of Amapás production is
committed under a long-term supply agreement with an operator of
an iron oxide pelletizing plant in the Kingdom of Bahrain.
Sonoma
Cliffs is a 45 percent economic interest owner in Sonoma in
Queensland, Australia. The project is currently operating and
expected to produce approximately 2.5 million tonnes of coal in
2008, up from a previous estimate of two million tonnes.
Production will include a mix of hard coking coal and thermal
coal. Sonoma has economically recoverable reserves of
27 million tonnes. All 2008 production is committed under
supply agreements with customers in Asia.
The
Iron Ore, Metallurgical Coal and Steel Industries
China produced 489 million tonnes of crude steel in 2007,
up 15 percent over 2006, accounting for approximately
37 percent of global production.
The rapid growth in steel production in China has only been
partially met by a corresponding increase in domestic Chinese
iron ore production. Chinese iron ore deposits, although
substantial, are of a lower grade (less than half of the
equivalent iron ore content) than the current iron ore supplied
from Brazil and Australia.
The world price of iron ore is influenced by international
demand. The rapid growth in Chinese demand, particularly in more
recent years, has created a market imbalance and has led to
demand outstripping supply. This market imbalance has recently
led to high spot prices for natural iron ore and increases of
9.5 percent, 19 percent and 71.5 percent in 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively, in benchmark prices for Brazilian
and Australian suppliers of iron ore. During the second quarter
of 2008, the Australian benchmark prices for lump and fines
settled at increases of 97 percent and 80 percent,
respectively. As a result, second quarter sales from
Cliffs Asia-Pacific Iron Ore segment were recorded based
on 2008 settled price increases, which reflects an incremental
increase of approximately $90.6 million when compared to
second quarter revenue measured at 2007 prices. In addition,
approximately $65.0 million of additional product revenue
related to first quarter sales was recognized in the second
quarter upon settlement of 2008 benchmark prices. The increased
demand for iron ore has resulted in the major iron ore suppliers
expanding efforts to increase their capacity.
Competition
Cliffs competes with several iron ore producers in North
America, including Iron Ore Company of Canada, ArcelorMittal
Mines Canada and United States Steel Corporation, or
U.S. Steel, as well as other steel companies
123
that own interests in iron ore mines that may have excess iron
ore inventories. In the coal industry, Cliffs competes with many
metallurgical coal producers including Alpha, Bluestone Coal
Corp., CONSOL Energy Inc., International Coal Group, Inc.,
Massey Energy Company, Jim Walter Resources, Inc., Peabody
Energy Corp., United Coal Group Company and numerous others.
As the North American steel industry continues to consolidate, a
major focus of the consolidation is on the continued life of the
integrated steel industrys raw steelmaking operations
(i.e., blast furnaces and basic oxygen furnaces that produce raw
steel). In addition, other competitive forces have become a
large factor in the iron ore business. Electric furnaces built
by mini-mills, which are steel recyclers, generally produce
steel by using scrap steel and reduced-iron products, not iron
ore pellets, in their electric furnaces.
Competition in the iron ore business and the coal business is
predicated upon the usual competitive factors of price,
availability of supply, product performance, service and
transportation cost to the consumer.
Portman exports iron ore products to China and Japan in the
world seaborne trade. Portman competes with major iron ore
exporters from Australia, Brazil and India.
Environment
General
Various governmental bodies are continually promulgating new
laws and regulations affecting Cliffs, its customers, and its
suppliers in many areas, including waste discharge and disposal,
hazardous classification of materials and products, air and
water discharges, and many other environmental, health, and
safety matters. Although Cliffs believes that its environmental
policies and practices are sound and does not expect that the
application of any current laws or regulations would reasonably
be expected to result in a material adverse effect on its
business or financial condition, Cliffs cannot predict the
collective adverse impact of the expanding body of laws and
regulations.
Specifically, proposals for voluntary initiatives and mandatory
controls are being discussed both in the United States and
worldwide to reduce greenhouse gases most notably
carbon dioxide, a by-product of burning fossil fuels and other
industrial processes. Although the outcome of these efforts
remains uncertain, Cliffs has proactively engaged outside
experts to more formally develop a comprehensive,
enterprise-wide greenhouse gas management strategy. The
comprehensive strategy is aimed at considering all significant
aspects associated with greenhouse gas initiatives and
optimizing Cliffs regulatory, operational, and financial
impacts
and/or
opportunities. Cliffs will continue to monitor developments
related to efforts to register and potentially regulate
greenhouse gas emissions.
North
American Iron Ore
In the construction of Cliffs facilities and in their
operation, substantial costs have been incurred and will
continue to be incurred to avoid undue effect on the
environment. Cliffs North American capital expenditures
relating to environmental matters were $8.8 million,
$10.5 million, and $9.2 million in 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. It is estimated that approximately
$10.8 million will be spent in 2008 for capital
environmental control facilities.
The iron ore industry has been identified by the EPA as an
industrial category that emits pollutants established by the
1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. These pollutants included over
200 substances that are now classified as hazardous air
pollutants, or HAP. The EPA is required to develop rules that
would require major sources of HAP to utilize Maximum Achievable
Control Technology standards for their emissions. Pursuant to
this statutory requirement, the EPA published a final rule on
October 30, 2003 imposing emission limitations and other
requirements on taconite iron ore processing operations. On
December 15, 2005, Cliffs and Ispat-Inland Mining Company
filed a Petition to Delete the iron ore industry as a source
category regulated by Section 112 of the Clean Air Act. The
EPA requested additional information, and a supplement was
submitted to the EPA on August 22, 2006. A response is
pending.
On March 10, 2005, the EPA issued the Clean Air Interstate
Rule, or CAIR, final regulations and on March 15, 2005, the
EPA issued the Clean Air Mercury Rule, or CAMR. The rules
establish phased reductions of NOx,
SO2
124
and mercury from electric power generating stations. After CAMR
was vacated early in 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the D.C. Circuit vacated CAIR in July 2008. The vacatur of the
rules does not preclude more stringent regulation of air
pollutants from power plants, and various legal and
administrative efforts are expected to reissue regulations in
new form. Accordingly, Cliffs anticipates that it will incur
capital and ongoing emission allowance costs at its Silver Bay
Power Plant to maintain compliance with the rule. As Cliffs is
still optimizing its various options for compliance, it cannot
accurately estimate the timing or cost of emission controls at
this time.
On December 16, 2006, Cliffs submitted an administrative
permit amendment application to the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency, or MPCA, with respect to Northshores Title V
operating permit. The proposed amendment requested the deletion
of a 30-year
old control city monitoring requirement which was
used to assess the adequacy of air emission control equipment
installed in the 1970s. MPCA had discontinued use of control
city monitoring in the early 1980s, but had recently
reinstituted monitoring. The control city monitoring compared
ambient fiber levels in St. Paul, Minnesota to levels at
Northshore and the surrounding area. The administrative permit
amendment application argued that the control city monitoring
requirement is an obsolete and redundant standard given
Northshores existing emission control equipment and
applicable federal regulations, state rules, and permit
requirements.
Cliffs received a letter dated February 23, 2007 from the
MPCA notifying Cliffs that its proposed permit amendment had
been denied. Cliffs has appealed the denial to the Minnesota
Court of Appeals. Subsequent to the filing of Cliffs
appeal, the MPCA advised Northshore that the MPCA considered
Northshore to be in violation of the control city standard. In
addition, the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy
intervened in Cliffs appeal of the denial of a proposed
permit amendment to its Title V operating permit. Oral
arguments on Cliffs appeal were held on February 21,
2008. The court of appeals ruled in MPCAs favor.
Subsequent to the court of appeals ruling, Northshore
filed a major permit amendment on August 28, 2008 to remove
the control city requirement from its permit. The permit
amendment is currently pending.
On July 28, 2008, MPCA issued a Notice of Violation, or
NOV, to Northshore alleging violations related to the control
city standard from March 2006 through October 2007
specifically with respect to MPCAs interpretation of the
control city standards emission limits and related
monitoring and reporting requirements. The NOV states that
Northshore has been in compliance with MPCAs
interpretation of the standard since October 2007, but requires
corrective actions relating to operating and maintaining
facilities of treatment and control to remain in compliance.
Although the NOV does not seek civil penalties, it contains
various requests for information and reserves the right for MPCA
to take further action. Northshore disputes the allegations
contained in the NOV and is currently assessing its
legal/administrative options. If either Cliffs appeal is
unsuccessful or if Cliffs is unable to negotiate an acceptable
compliance schedule, Northshore could be subject to future
enforcement actions with respect to its Title V operating
permit if Cliffs is unable to meet the permit requirements as
interpreted by MPCA.
Additionally, as part of Northshores permitting of the
restart of Furnace 5, Northshore is required to certify
compliance with air emission standards within 180 days of
operation. During the scheduled compliance testing for Furnace
5, Northshore experienced abnormal operating difficulties and
was thereby unable to certify compliance. Northshore will
perform retesting as soon as Furnace 5 returns to normal
operating conditions and anticipates meeting the required
limits. Accordingly, Northshore will take appropriate steps to
establish compliance with MPCA.
On March 27, 2008, United Taconite received a draft
stipulation agreement, or DSA, from the MPCA alleging various
air emissions violations of the facilitys air permit limit
conditions, reporting and testing requirements. The allegations
generally stem from procedures put in place prior to 2004 when
Cliffs first acquired its interest in the mine. The DSA requires
the facility to install continuous emissions monitoring,
evaluate compliance procedures, submit a plan to implement
procedures to eliminate air deviations during the relevant time
period, and proposes a civil penalty in an amount to be
determined. While United Taconite does not agree with
MPCAs allegations, United Taconite and the MPCA continue
discussions on the matter with the intent of working toward a
mutual resolution.
North
American Coal
In 1996 and 1997, two cases were brought alleging that dust from
the Concord Preparation Plant damaged properties in the area. In
2002, the parties entered into settlement agreements with the
former owner in exchange for
125
a lump sum payment and the agreement to implement remedial
measures. However, the plaintiffs were not required to dismiss
their claims. PinnOak was added to these cases in 2004 and 2006.
The plaintiffs in these matters are now seeking additional
remediation measures and Cliffs is opposing this assertion and
believes that any amounts ultimately paid in this matter will
not be material. In addition to the two cases noted above, in
2004 approximately 160 individual plaintiffs brought an action
against PinnOak asserting injuries arising from particulate
emissions from the Concord Preparation Plant. Cliffs is seeking
a summary judgment in this most recent matter because it had
previously been concluded under the 2002 settlement agreement.
Pinnacle Mining owns the closed West Virginia Maitland mine,
which continues to discharge groundwater to Elkhorn Creek under
terms of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit issued by the West Virginia Department of Environment
Protection, or DEP. On April 30, 2008 the DEP renewed the
permit and imposed more stringent effluent quality limitations
for iron and aluminum. Current effluent iron concentrations
sometimes exceed the new limitation. A permit appeal was filed
with the West Virginia Environmental Quality Board regarding the
reduced limitations and the absence of a compliance schedule in
the permit. Pinnacle Mining reached an agreement with the DEP
that has provided a compliance schedule for meeting the new
limits. Pinnacle Mining believes it will be able to achieve the
new limits without any material costs or changes in operation.
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Environmental issues and their management continued to be an
important focus at Cliffs Asia-Pacific iron ore operations
throughout 2007. Mining operations proceeded without major
environmental incidents. Implementation of management controls
at the Koolyanobbing operations continued, and a significant
milestone was achieved with the certification of the
environmental management system to the International Standards
Organization standard 14001.
A third-party compliance review of the Koolyanobbing operations
was undertaken during 2007. The Koolyanobbing operations are
among the most heavily regulated mining operations in Western
Australia, with environmental conditions set at both state and
federal government levels. The review audited compliance with
over 200 regulatory conditions and management plan commitments.
A high level of compliance was achieved across all areas. Nine
items of non-compliance were reported, with most being
non-material in terms of environmental risk. Work commenced to
address these items, including improved blasting procedures, the
initiation of a project to quantify dust emission sources and
the inclusion of soil assessment protocols in waste dump
planning.
The Asia-Pacific iron ore environmental team was strengthened
during the year to ensure that both the current mine operations
continue to be well managed and that expansion plans receive
timely environmental assessment and approvals.
Cliffs commenced a major environmental permitting program at the
Koolyanobbing operations in 2007 in preparation of the
submission of approval applications for a number of development
proposals in 2008. The program included environmental baseline
and impact assessment for expansion of pits and waste dumps at
Koolyanobbing, Mount Jackson and Windarling. Groundwater
studies, including a ground water re-injection trial, were
completed in support of an approval application for mining below
the water table at Windarling.
In May 2007, the Australian Environmental Protection Agency, or
AEPA, released a report outlining the recommendations for a
significant extension of the conservation estate in the area of
the Koolyanobbing mining operations. The AEPA report recommended
the conversion of much of the area to Class A conservation
reserve, which effectively excludes mining activities. The
report represents the view of the AEPA and neither creates an
obligation on the government to act nor affects the rights of
Portman to operate under existing approvals. However, if
implemented, the AEPA recommendations would severely constrain
Portmans expansion opportunities in the vicinity of the
current operations. There are disparate views within government
agencies over the issue. Cliffs has communicated its concerns to
the government in a manner that indicates a willingness to work
with all parties to achieve a sustainable outcome for
conservation and resource development in the region.
At the Cockatoo Island operations, the focus of environmental
work was on preparing a submission for environmental approvals
for extension of the embankment mining project. A submission was
lodged with the regulatory agencies in December 2007 to extend
the existing Stage 1 and 2 seawalls eastwards adding a further
three
126
years mine life. In addition to this extension proposal work
continued on refining the overall closure plan for Cockatoo
Island taking into account the proposed extension. The Stage 3
extension and closure plan were reviewed as a package by the
regulators and approved in August 2008 for both the extension
and the closure plan. Activities within the closure plan not
associated with the Stage 3 extension have been programmed over
the
2008/2009 years.
Environmental
and Mine Closure Obligations
Cliffs had environmental and mine closure liabilities of
$131.8 million and $130.8 million at June 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Payments in the
first six months of 2008 were $3.8 million compared with
$9.2 million for the full year in 2007. The following is a
summary of the obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
Mine closure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV Steel Mining Company, or LTVSMC
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
Operating mines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mine closure
|
|
|
118.2
|
|
|
|
118.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total environmental and mine closure obligations
|
|
|
131.8
|
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term environmental and mine closure obligations
|
|
$
|
125.0
|
|
|
$
|
123.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
The Rio
Tinto Mine Site
The Rio Tinto Mine Site is a historic underground copper mine
located near Mountain City, Nevada, where tailings were placed
in Mill Creek, a tributary to the Owyhee River. Site
investigation and remediation work is being conducted in
accordance with a consent order between the Nevada Department of
Environmental Protection, and the Rio Tinto Working Group, or
RTWG, composed of Cliffs, Atlantic Richfield Company, Teck
Cominco American Incorporated, and E. I. du Pont de Nemours and
Company. The estimated costs of the available remediation
alternatives currently range from approximately
$10.0 million to $30.5 million. In recognition of the
potential for a Natural Resource Damages, or NRD, claim, the
parties are actively pursuing a global settlement that would
include the EPA and encompass both the remedial action and the
NRD issues. Cliffs has increased its reserve most recently in
the second quarter of 2008 by $3.0 million to reflect
revised cleanup estimates and cost allocation associated with
Cliffs anticipated share of the eventual remediation costs
based on a consideration of the various remedial measures and
related cost estimates, which are currently under review.
Mine
Closure
The mine closure obligations are for Cliffs four
consolidated North American operating iron ore mines,
Cliffs three consolidated North American operating coal
mines, Cliffs Asia-Pacific operating iron ore mines, the
coal mine at Sonoma and a closed operation formerly known as
LTVSMC. The LTVSMC closure obligation results from an October
2001 transaction where subsidiaries of Cliffs received a net
payment of $50 million and certain other assets and assumed
environmental and certain facility closure obligations of
$50 million. Obligations have declined to
$21.1 million at June 30, 2008.
127
The accrued closure obligation for Cliffs active mining
operations provides for contractual and legal obligations
associated with the eventual closure of the mining operations.
The accretion of the liability and amortization of the related
fixed asset is recognized over the estimated mine lives for each
location. The following represents a rollforward of Cliffs
asset retirement obligation liability for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
96.0
|
|
|
$
|
62.7
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
PinnOak acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
Sonoma investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Reclassification adjustment
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Exchange rate changes
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Revision in estimated cash flows
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
97.1
|
|
|
$
|
96.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a
12-month
rollforward of Cliffs asset retirement obligation at
December 31, 2007. |
Energy
Electricity. The Empire and Tilden mines
receive electric power from WEPCO. Under the contracts, Empire
and Tilden were afforded an energy price cap and certain power
curtailment features. These contracts terminated at the end of
the 2007 calendar year. Prior to the termination of the
contracts in 2007, WEPCO initiated a tariff rate case in which
Empire and Tilden participated in order to establish a new
tariff rate for each mine upon the termination of the contracts.
The resulting settlement, which was approved by the Michigan
Public Service Commission, created a new industrial tariff rate.
Effective January 1, 2008 Tilden and Empire receive their
electrical power from WEPCO under the new tariff rate. On
January 31, 2008, WEPCO filed a new rate case, proposing an
increase to the tariff rates that became effective on
January 1, 2008. In February 2008, Cliffs filed a petition
to intervene in the new rate case. Cliffs is also reviewing the
rate case and analyzing the potential impact on Empire and
Tilden.
Electric power for the Hibbing and United Taconite mines is
supplied by Minnesota Power, Inc., or MP, under agreements that
continue to December 2008 and October 2008, respectively. Silver
Bay Power Company, or Silver Bay, an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of Cliffs, with a 115 megawatt power plant, provides
the majority of Northshores energy requirements. Silver
Bay has an interconnection agreement with MP for backup power.
Silver Bay entered into an agreement to sell 40 megawatts of
excess power capacity to Xcel Energy under a contract that
extends to 2011. In March 2008, Northshore reactivated one of
its furnaces resulting in a shortage of electrical power of
approximately 10 megawatts. As a result, supplemental electric
power is purchased by Northshore from MP under an agreement that
continues to March 2009.
Wabush owns a portion of the Twin Falls Hydro Generation
facility that provides power for Wabushs mining operations
in Newfoundland. Wabush has a
20-year
agreement with Newfoundland Power, which continues until
December 31, 2014. This agreement allows an interchange of
water rights in return for the power needs for Wabushs
mining operations. The Wabush pelletizing operations in Quebec
are served by Quebec Hydro on an annual contract.
The Oak Grove Resources, LLC, or Oak Grove, mine and Concord
Preparation Plant are supplied electrical power by Alabama Power
under a contract which expires June 30, 2009. Rates of the
contract are subject to change during the term of the contract
as regulated by the Alabama Public Service Commission.
Electrical power to the Pinnacle, Green Ridge No. 1, Green
Ridge No. 2 mines and the Pinnacle Preparation Plant are
supplied by the Appalachian Power Company under two contracts.
The Indian Creek contract is renewable on July 24, 2009 and
the Pinnacle Creek contract is renewable on July 4, 2009.
Both contracts specify the applicable rate schedule, minimum
monthly charge and power capacity furnished. Rates, terms and
conditions of the contracts are subject to the approval of the
Public Service Commission of West Virginia.
128
Koolyanobbing and its associated satellite mines draw power from
independent diesel fueled power stations and generators.
Temporary diesel power generation capacity has been installed at
the Koolyanobbing operations, allowing sufficient time for a
detailed investigation into the viability of long-term options
such as connecting into the Western Australian South West
Interconnected System or provision of natural gas or dual fuel
(natural gas and diesel) generating capacity. These options are
not economic for the satellite mines, which will continue being
powered by diesel generators.
Electrical supply on Cockatoo Island is diesel generated. The
powerhouse adjacent to the processing plant powers the
shiploader, fuel farm and the processing plant. The workshop and
administration office is powered by a separate generator.
Sonoma receives its electricity from the public grid generated
by local electric retailer Ergon Energy. In 2008, Sonoma plans
to go to the contestable energy market and invite offers to
supply electricity on a long-term basis. The state of Queensland
enjoys a competitive deregulated energy market.
Process Fuel. Cliffs has contracts providing
for the transport of natural gas for its United States iron ore
operations. The Empire and Tilden mines have the capability of
burning natural gas, coal, or to a lesser extent, oil. The
Hibbing and Northshore mines have the capability to burn natural
gas and oil. The United Taconite mine has the ability to burn
coal, natural gas and coke breeze. Although all of the
U.S. iron ore mines have the capability of burning natural
gas, with higher natural gas prices, the pelletizing operations
for the U.S. iron ore mines utilize alternate fuels when
practicable. Wabush has the capability to burn oil and coke
breeze.
Research
and Development
Cliffs has been a leader in iron ore mining technology for more
than 160 years. Cliffs operated some of the first mines on
Michigans Marquette Iron Range and pioneered early
open-pit and underground mining methods. From the first
application of electrical power in Michigans underground
mines to the use today of sophisticated computers and global
positioning satellite systems, Cliffs has been a leader in the
application of new technology to the centuries-old business of
mineral extraction. Today, Cliffs engineering and
technical staffs are engaged in full-time technical support of
Cliffs operations and improvement of existing products.
As part of Cliffs efforts to develop alternative metallic
products, Cliffs is developing, with Kobe Steel, a
commercial-scale reduced iron plant, which will convert hematite
into nearly pure iron in nugget form utilizing Kobe Steels
ITmk3®
technology. This innovative technology has the potential to open
new markets by offering an economically competitive supply of
iron material for electric arc furnaces.
North American Coal and Asia-Pacific Iron Ore do not have any
material research and development projects.
Employees
As of June 30, 2008, Cliffs had a total of
5,928 employees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
|
|
|
American
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Ore
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
Iron Ore
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Salaried
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
1,620
|
|
Hourly
|
|
|
3,519
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(1)
|
|
|
4,526
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes Cliffs employees and the employees of the North
American joint ventures. |
Hourly employees at Cliffs Michigan and Minnesota iron ore
mining operations (other than Northshore) are represented by the
USW. Cliffs has entered into an agreement with the USW on a new
four-year labor contract to replace the labor agreement that
expired on September 1, 2008 and that will cover
approximately 2,300 USW-represented workers at Empire and Tilden
mines in Michigan, and its United Taconite and Hibbing mines in
Minnesota.
129
In April 2006, the USW advised Cliffs with a Written
Notification that it was initiating an organizing campaign
at Northshore. Under the terms of Cliffs collective
bargaining agreements with the USW, Cliffs is required to remain
neutral during the organizing campaign. Based upon subsequent
conversations with USW representatives, the organizing campaign
was postponed pending resolution of issues related to the
neutrality commitment in the collective bargaining agreement.
Hourly employees at Wabush are represented by the USW. Wabush
and the USW entered into a collective bargaining agreement in
October 2004 that expires on March 1, 2009.
Hourly production and maintenance employees at PinnOak
subsidiary corporations are represented by the UMWA. Each of
these subsidiary companies entered into new collective
bargaining agreements with the UMWA in March 2007 that expire on
December 31, 2011. Those collective agreements are
identical in all material respects to the National Bituminous
Coal Wage Agreement of 2007 between the UMWA and the Bituminous
Coal Operators Association.
Cliffs employees at Asia-Pacific operations are not
represented under collective bargaining agreements.
As of June 30, 2008, 66 percent of Cliffs
employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements.
Growth
Strategy
Cliffs expects to grow its business and presence as an
international mining company by expanding both geographically
and through the minerals that it mines and markets. Recent
investments in Australia and Latin America, as well as
acquisitions in minerals outside of iron ore, such as coal,
illustrate the execution of this strategy.
For information regarding Cliffs growth strategy, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Cliffs Growth
Strategy and Strategic Transactions beginning on
page 145.
Properties
The following map shows the locations of Cliffs operations:
Mine Facilities and Equipment. Each of the
North American Iron Ore mines has crushing, concentrating, and
pelletizing facilities. There are crushing and screening
facilities at Koolyanobbing and Cockatoo Island.
North American Coal mines have preparation, processing, and
load-out facilities, with the Pinnacle and Green Ridge mines
sharing facilities. The facilities at each site are in
satisfactory condition, although they require routine capital
and maintenance expenditures on an ongoing basis. Certain mine
equipment generally is powered by
130
electricity, diesel fuel or gasoline. The total cost of the
property, plant and equipment, net of applicable accumulated
amortization and depreciation as of June 30, 2008, for each
of the mines is set forth in the chart below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Historical Cost of Mine
|
|
|
|
Plant and Equipment (Excluding
|
|
|
|
Real Estate and Construction in
|
|
|
|
Progress), Net of Applicable
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Amortization and
|
|
Location and Name
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Empire
|
|
$
|
62.9
|
(1)
|
Tilden
|
|
|
186.6
|
(2)
|
Hibbing
|
|
|
476.6
|
(3)
|
Northshore
|
|
|
84.0
|
|
United Taconite
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
Wabush
|
|
|
460.1
|
(3)
|
Pinnacle Complex
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
Oak Grove
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
Sonoma
|
|
|
147.4
|
(4)
|
Cockatoo Island
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Koolyanobbing
|
|
|
247.4
|
|
Amapá
|
|
|
472.7
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes capitalized financing costs of $5.5 million, net
of accumulated amortization. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes capitalized financing costs of $14.7 million, net
of accumulated amortization. |
|
(3) |
|
Does not reflect depreciation, which is recorded by the
individual venturers. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes capitalized financing costs of $2.7 million, net
of accumulated amortization. |
|
(5) |
|
Cockatoo Island plant and equipment is fully amortized. |
North
American Iron Ore
Cliffs directly or indirectly owns and operate interests in the
following six North American iron ore mines:
Empire
mine
The Empire mine is located on the Marquette Iron Range in
Michigans Upper Peninsula approximately 15 miles
west-southwest of Marquette, Michigan. The mine has been in
operation since 1963. Over the past five years, the Empire mine
has produced between 4.8 million and 5.4 million tons
of iron ore pellets annually.
Cliffs is a 79.0 percent partner in Empire, and a
subsidiary of ArcelorMittal USA has retained a 21 percent
ownership in Empire with limited rights and obligations, which
it has a unilateral right to put to Cliffs at any time
subsequent to the end of 2007. This right has not been
exercised. Cliffs owns directly approximately one-half of the
remaining ore reserves at the Empire mine and leases them to
Empire. A subsidiary of Cliffs leases the balance of the Empire
reserves from other owners of such reserves and subleases them
to Empire.
Tilden
mine
The Tilden mine is located on the Marquette Iron Range in
Michigans Upper Peninsula approximately five miles south
of Ishpeming, Michigan. The Tilden mine has been in operation
since 1974. Over the past five years, the Tilden mine has
produced between 6.9 million and 7.9 million tons of
iron ore pellets annually.
Cliffs owns 85 percent of Tilden, with the remaining
minority interest owned by U.S. Steel Canada. Each partner
takes its share of production pro rata; however, provisions in
the partnership agreement allow additional or reduced production
to be delivered under certain circumstances. Cliffs owns all of
the ore reserves at the Tilden mine and leases them to Tilden.
131
The Empire and Tilden mines are located adjacent to each other.
The logistical benefits include a consolidated transportation
system, more efficient employee and equipment operating
schedules, reduction in redundant facilities and workforce and
best practices sharing.
Hibbing
mine
The Hibbing mine is located in the center of Minnesotas
Mesabi Iron Range and is approximately ten miles north of
Hibbing, Minnesota and five miles west of Chisholm, Minnesota.
The Hibbing mine has been in operation since 1976. Over the past
five years, the Hibbing mine has produced between
7.4 million and 8.5 million tons of iron ore pellets
annually.
Cliffs owns 23 percent of Hibbing, ArcelorMittal USA has a
62.3 percent interest, and U.S. Steel Canada has a
14.7 percent interest. Each partner takes its share of
production pro rata; however, provisions in the joint venture
agreement allow additional or reduced production to be delivered
under certain circumstances.
Northshore
mine
The Northshore mine is located in northeastern Minnesota,
approximately two miles south of Babbitt, Minnesota on the
northeastern end of the Mesabi Iron Range. Northshores
processing facilities are located in Silver Bay, Minnesota, near
Lake Superior, on U.S. Highway 61. The Northshore mine has
been in continuous operation since 1990. Over the past five
years, the Northshore mine has produced between 4.8 million
and 5.2 million tons of iron ore pellets annually.
The Northshore mine began production under Cliffs
management and ownership on October 1, 1994. Cliffs owns
100 percent of the mine.
United
Taconite mine
The United Taconite mine is located on Minnesotas Mesabi
Iron Range in and around the city of Eveleth, Minnesota. The
United Taconite concentrator and pelletizing facilities are
located 10 miles south of the mine, near the town of
Forbes, Minnesota. The main entrance to the concentrator and
pelletizing facilities is on County Road 16, three miles west of
State Highway 53. The mine has been operating since 1965. Over
the past five years, the United Taconite mine has produced
between 1.6 million and 5.3 million tons of iron ore
pellets annually.
On July 11, 2008, Cliffs signed and closed on the
acquisition of the remaining 30 percent interest in United
Taconite, with an effective date of July 1, 2008. Upon
consummation of the purchase, Cliffs ownership interest in
United Taconite increased from 70 percent to
100 percent.
Wabush
mine
The Wabush mine and concentrator is located in Wabush, Labrador,
Newfoundland, and the pellet plant is located in Pointe Noire,
Quebec, Canada. The Wabush mine has been in operation since
1965. Over the past five years, the Wabush mine has produced
between 3.8 million and 5.2 million tons of iron ore
pellets annually. Cliffs owns 26.8 percent of Wabush,
Dofasco has a 28.6 percent interest and U.S. Steel
Canada has a 44.6 percent interest.
North
American Coal
Cliffs directly owns and operates the following three North
American coal mines:
Pinnacle
and Green Ridge mines
The Pinnacle Complex includes the Pinnacle and Green Ridge mines
and is located approximately 30 miles southwest of Beckley,
West Virginia. The Pinnacle mine has been in operation since
1969. Over the past five years, the Pinnacle mine has produced
between 1.4 million and 2.5 million tons of coal
annually. The Green Ridge mine has been in operation since 2004
and has produced between 0.4 million and 0.5 million
tons of coal annually.
132
Oak Grove
mine
The Oak Grove mine is located approximately 25 miles
southwest of Birmingham, Alabama. The mine has been in operation
since 1972. Over the past five years, the Oak Grove mine has
produced between 1.3 million and 1.7 million tons of
coal annually.
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Koolyanobbing
The Koolyanobbing operations are located 425 kilometers east of
Perth and approximately 50 kilometers northeast of the town of
Southern Cross. Koolyanobbing produces lump and fine iron ore.
An expansion program was completed in 2006 to increase capacity
from six to eight million tonnes per annum. The expansion was
primarily driven by the development of iron ore resources at
Mount Jackson and Windarling, located 80 kilometers and 100
kilometers north of the existing Koolyanobbing operations,
respectively. Over the past five years, the Koolyanobbing
operation has produced between 4.9 million and
7.6 million tonnes annually.
Cockatoo
Island
The Cockatoo Island operation is located six kilometers to the
west of Yampi Peninsula, in the Buccaneer Archipelago, and
140 kilometers north of Derby in the West Kimberley region of
Western Australia. The island has been mined for iron ore since
1951, with a break in operations between 1985 and 1993. Over the
past five years, Cockatoo Island has produced between
0.6 million and 1.4 million tonnes annually at the
100 percent ownership level.
Portman commenced a beneficiation project in 1993 that was
completed in mid-2000. Portman owns a 50 percent interest
in this joint venture to mine remnant iron ore deposits. Mining
from this phase of the operation commenced in late 2000.
Cockatoo Island production ceased at the end of the second
quarter 2008, with shipments to continue into the third quarter
2008. Construction on a necessary extension of the existing
seawall will commence in the third quarter 2008, with production
anticipated to restart by the end of the second quarter 2009.
This extension is expected to extend production for
approximately two additional years. Ore is hauled by haul truck
to the stockpiles, crushed and screened and then transferred by
conveyor to the shiploader.
Transportation
Two railroads, one of which is wholly-owned by Cliffs, link the
Empire and Tilden mines with Lake Michigan at the loading port
of Escanaba, Michigan and with the Lake Superior loading port of
Marquette, Michigan. From the Mesabi Range, Hibbing pellets are
transported by rail to a shiploading port at Superior,
Wisconsin. United Taconite pellets are shipped by railroad to
the port of Duluth, Minnesota. At Northshore, crude ore is
shipped by a wholly-owned railroad from the mine to processing
and dock facilities at Silver Bay, Minnesota. In Canada, there
is an open-pit mine and concentrator at Wabush, Labrador,
Newfoundland and a pellet plant and dock facility at Pointe
Noire, Quebec. At the Wabush mine, concentrates are shipped by
rail from the Scully mine at Wabush to Pointe Noire where they
are pelletized for shipment via vessel within Canada, to the
United States and other international destinations or shipped as
concentrates for sinter feed.
Cliffs coal production is shipped domestically by rail,
barge and/or
truck. Coal for international customers is shipped through the
port of Mobile, Alabama or Newport News, Virginia.
All of the ore mined at the Koolyanobbing operations is
transported by rail to the Port of Esperance,
575 kilometers to the south for shipment to Asian
customers. Direct ship premium fines mined at Cockatoo Island
are loaded at a local dock.
Internal
Control over Reserve Estimation
Cliffs has a corporate policy relating to internal control and
procedures with respect to auditing and estimating mineral
reserves. The procedures include the calculation of mineral
reserves at each mine by mining engineers and geologists under
the direction of Cliffs Chief Mining Engineer.
Cliffs General Manager-Resource Technology
133
compiles, reviews, and submits the calculations to the Corporate
Accounting department, where the disclosures for Cliffs
annual and quarterly reports are prepared based on those
calculations. The draft disclosure is submitted to Cliffs
General Manager-Resource Technology for further review and
approval. The draft disclosures are then reviewed and approved
by Cliffs Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive
Officer before inclusion in Cliffs annual and quarterly
reports. Additionally, the long-range mine planning and mineral
reserve estimates are reviewed annually by Cliffs Audit
Committee. Furthermore, all changes to mineral reserve
estimates, other than those due to production, are documented by
Cliffs General Manager-Resource Technology and are
submitted to Cliffs President and Chief Executive Officer
for review and approval. Finally, Cliffs performs periodic
reviews of long-range mine plans and mineral reserve estimates
at mine staff meetings and senior management meetings.
Operations
In North America, Cliffs produced 21.8 million,
20.8 million and 22.1 million long tons of iron ore
pellets in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for Cliffs
account and 12.8 million, 12.8 million and
13.8 million long tons, respectively, on behalf of the
steel company owners of the mines. Cliffs also produced
1.1 million short tons of coal in North America in 2007,
representing Cliffs volume since the acquisition of
PinnOak on July 31, 2007. In Australia, Cliffs produced
8.4 million tonnes, 7.7 million tonnes and
5.2 million tonnes in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Asia-Pacific Iron Ores 2005 total represents production
since the March 31, 2005 acquisition of a controlling
interest in Portman. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
Cliffs beginning on page 144 for further information
regarding production and sales volumes.
Cliffs business is subject to a number of operational
factors that can affect Cliffs future profitability.
Mine
Capacity and Ore Reserves
Reserves are defined by SEC Industry Standard Guide 7 as that
part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and legally
extracted and produced at the time of the reserve determination.
All reserves are classified as proven or probable and are
supported by life-of-mine plans.
North
American Iron Ore
Cliffs 2008 ore reserve estimates for its iron ore mines
as of December 31, 2007 were estimated from fully-designed
open pits developed using three-dimensional modeling techniques.
These fully designed pits incorporate design slopes, practical
mining shapes and access ramps to assure the accuracy of
Cliffs reserve estimates. The
134
following tables reflect expected current annual capacity and
economic ore reserves for Cliffs North American and
Asia-Pacific iron ore mines as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Mineral Reserves(2)(3)
|
|
|
Mineral
|
|
|
Method of
|
|
|
Iron Ore
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
Current Year
|
|
|
Previous
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
Reserve
|
Mine
|
|
Mineralization
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Estimation
|
|
|
|
|
Tons in millions(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Empire
|
|
Negaunee Iron
Formation
Model
(Magnetite)
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
Geologic Block
|
Tilden
|
|
Negaunee Iron
Formation
(Hematite / Magnetite)
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
Geologic Block
Model
|
Hibbing Taconite
|
|
Biwabik Iron
Formation
(Magnetite)
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
Geologic Block
Model
|
Northshore
|
|
Biwabik Iron
Formation
(Magnetite)
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Geologic Block
Mode
|
United Taconite
|
|
Biwabik Iron
Formation
(Magnetite)
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Geologic Block
Model
|
Wabush
|
|
Wabush Iron
Formation
(Hematite)
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Geologic Block
Model
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tons are long tons of pellets of 2,240 pounds. |
|
(2) |
|
Estimated standard equivalent pellets, including both proven and
probable reserves based on life-of-mine operating schedules. |
|
(3) |
|
Cliffs regularly evaluates its reserves estimates and updated
them in accordance with SEC Industry Guide 7. |
In 2007, there were no changes in reserve estimates at Hibbing,
Tilden, Northshore or Wabush, except for production.
A new ore reserve estimate was completed at United Taconite that
incorporates increased iron ore pellet pricing, addition of new
mining areas, and improved pit designs and production schedules.
The updated ore reserve estimate calculated a 31 percent
increase, or 35 million tons.
During 2007, the geologic resource model at Empire was updated
by modifying an ore quality cut-off for oxidation. The net
result of gains from a 2006 re-optimization of the life of mine
pit design and losses due to this oxidized material resulted in
an increase of two million tons in the remaining pellet reserves.
135
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Mineral Reserves(2)(3)
|
|
Mineral
|
|
Method of
|
|
|
Iron Ore
|
|
Annual
|
|
Current Year
|
|
Previous
|
|
Rights
|
|
Reserve
|
Mine Project
|
|
Mineralization
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Proven
|
|
Probable
|
|
Total
|
|
Year
|
|
Owned
|
|
Leased
|
|
Estimation
|
|
|
|
|
Tons in millions(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Koolyanobbing(4)
|
|
Banded Iron Formations Southern Cross Terrane Yilgarn Mineral
Field
(Hematite, Goethite)
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Geologic Block
Model
|
Cockatoo Island(5)
|
|
Sandstone Yampi Formation Kimberley Mineral Field
(Hematite)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Geologic Block
Model
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tons are metric tonnes of 2,205 pounds. |
|
(2) |
|
Reported ore reserves restricted to both proven and probable
reserves based on life of mine operating schedules.
Koolyanobbing reserves can be derived from up to 15 separate
mineral deposits over a
100-kilometer
operating distance. 7.4 million tonnes of the Koolyanobbing
reserves are sourced from current long-term stockpiles. |
|
(3) |
|
Cliffs regularly updates its reserves estimates in accordance
with SEC Industry Guide 7 and the 2004 Edition of the Joint Ore
Reserves Code. |
|
(4) |
|
An expansion project was completed in 2006 that increased annual
production capacity to 8 million tonnes. |
|
(5) |
|
Portman has a 50 percent interest in the Cockatoo Island
Joint Venture. Capacity and reserve totals represent
100 percent. |
The increase in Koolyanobbing ore reserves is related to
exploration success in expanding the mineral resource inventory
and conversion of inferred resources to indicated resources.
Mining at Cockatoo Island was conducted to deeper levels than
originally planned during 2007, with mined production from the
current Stage 2 pit now planned to continue until the second
quarter of 2008. Product iron grades have also been lowered to
assist extension of the mine life, but the revised grades still
generate a premium fines product.
North
American Coal
Cliffs 2008 reserve estimates for its North American
underground coal mines as of December 31, 2007 were
estimated using three-dimensional modeling techniques, coupled
with mine plan designs. A complete re-estimation of the moist,
recoverable coal reserves and life-of-mine plans was completed
after the PinnOak acquisition. The following table reflects
expected current annual capacities and economically recoverable
reserves for Cliffs North American coal mines as of
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Proven and Probable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
In-
|
|
|
Moist
|
|
|
Mineral Rights
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
Mine(2)
|
|
Category
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Place
|
|
|
Recoverable
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Estimation
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
Tons in millions(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Complex
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Geologic
|
|
Mine, Preparation
|
Pocahontas No 3
|
|
Assigned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126.0
|
|
|
|
62.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Block Model
|
|
Plant, Load-out
|
Pocahontas No 4
|
|
Unassigned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oak Grove
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Geologic
|
|
Mine, Preparation
|
Blue Creek Seam
|
|
Assigned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91.1
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Block Model
|
|
Plant, Load-out
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(3)
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
249.9
|
|
|
|
123.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Short tons of 2,000 pounds. |
136
|
|
|
(2) |
|
All coal extracted by underground mining using longwall and
continuous miner equipment. |
|
(3) |
|
All recoverable coal is less than 1 percent sulfur and more
than 13,000 Btu/lb. as received. |
Asia-Pacific
Coal
The 2008 reserve estimate for Cliffs Asia-Pacific coal
mine as of December 31, 2007 is based on a Joint Ore
Reserves Code-compliant resource estimate. An optimized pit
design for an initial
10-year mine
operating schedule was generated supporting the reserve estimate.
The following table reflects expected current annual capacity
and economically recoverable reserves for Sonoma:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Proven and Probable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moist
|
|
|
Mineral Rights
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
Mine(2)
|
|
Category
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
In-Place
|
|
|
Recoverable
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Estimation
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
Tons in millions(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sonoma Mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moranbah Coal Measures
B, C and E Seams
|
|
Assigned
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
Geologic
|
|
Mine,
Preparation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Block Model
|
|
Plant,
Load-out
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Metric tonnes of 2,205 pounds. In-place tons at eight percent
moisture, recoverable clean tons at nine percent moisture.
Reserves listed on 100 percent basis. Cliffs has an
effective 45 percent interest in the joint venture. |
|
(2) |
|
All coal is extracted by conventional surface mining techniques. |
Sonomas recoverable coal reserves are primarily
metallurgical grade coal (standard coking coal plus low volatile
coal for pulverized coal injection) and steam coal.
General
Information about the Mines
Leases. Mining is conducted on multiple
mineral leases having varying expiration dates. Mining leases
are routinely renegotiated and renewed as they approach their
respective expiration dates.
Exploration and Development. All iron ore
mining operations are open-pit mines that are in production.
Additional pit development is underway at each mine as required
by long-range mine plans. At Cliffs North American Iron
Ore mines, drilling programs are conducted periodically for the
purpose of refining guidance related to ongoing operations.
The Biwabik, Negaunee, and Wabush Iron Formations are classified
as Lake Superior type iron-formations that formed under similar
sedimentary conditions in shallow marine basins approximately
two billion years ago. Magnetite
and/or
hematite are the predominant iron oxide ore minerals present,
with lesser amounts of goethite and limonite. Chert is the
predominant waste mineral present, with lesser amounts of
silicate and carbonate minerals. The ore minerals liberate from
the waste minerals upon fine grinding.
All North American Coal mine operations are underground mines
that are in production. Drilling programs are conducted
periodically for the purpose of refining guidance related to
ongoing operations. The Pocahontas No 3 and Blue Creek Coal
Seams are Pennsylvanian Age low ash, high quality coals.
At Koolyanobbing, an exploration program targeting extensions to
the iron ore resource base as well as regional exploration
targets in the Yilgarn Mineral Field was active in 2007 and will
continue in 2008. At Cockatoo Island, feasibility studies have
been completed for a below-sea-level eastward mine pit
extension. Environmental permitting has been initiated
supporting this proposed extension to the Cockatoo mine life.
The mineralization at the Koolyanobbing operations is
predominantly hematite and goethite replacements in
greenstone-hosted banded iron-formations. Individual deposits
tend to be small with complex ore-waste contact relationships.
The Koolyanobbing operations reserves are derived from 15
separate mineral deposits distributed over a
100-kilometer
operating radius. The mineralization at Cockatoo Island is
predominantly friable, hematite-rich sandstone that produces
premium high grade, low impurity direct shipping fines.
137
An exploration program providing geologic definition of the
hematite mineralization at Amapá is ongoing.
Mineralized material at the Amapá mine is predominantly
hematite occurring in weathered and leached greenstone-hosted
banded iron-formation of the Archean Vila Nova Group. Variable
degrees of leaching generate friable hematite mineralization
suitable for either sinter feed production via crushing and
gravity separation or pelletizing feed production via grinding
and flotation.
In Australia, the Sonoma mine operation is an open-cut mine
located in the northern section of Queenslands Bowen
Basin. A mix of high quality metallurgical coal and thermal coal
is recovered from the B and C seams of the Permian Mooranbah
Coal Measures.
Geologic models are developed for all mines to define the major
ore and waste rock types. Computerized block models are then
constructed that include all relevant geologic and metallurgical
data. These are used to generate grade and tonnage estimates,
followed by detailed mine design and life of mine operating
schedules.
Legal
Proceedings
Alabama Dust Litigation. In 1996 and 1997, two
cases (White, et al. v. USX Corporation, et al., and
Weekley, et al. v. USX Corporation, et al.) were brought
alleging that dust from the Concord Coal Preparation Plant
damaged properties in the area. In 2002, the parties entered
into settlement agreements with the former owner in exchange for
a lump sum payment and the agreement to implement remedial
measures. However, the plaintiffs were not required to dismiss
their claims. PinnOak was added to these cases in 2004 and 2006.
The plaintiffs in both these matters sought additional
remediation measures, and Cliffs opposed that request.
Currently, Cliffs is in discussions with the plaintiffs
regarding a potential amendment to the settlement of the White
matter, which would be subject to approval by the court. Any
resolution of the matter would involve monitoring the level of
particulate emissions from the Concord Coal Preparation Plant
and implementing further remedial measures as necessary, and any
amounts ultimately paid in connection with this case would not
be material. The Weekley case is currently pending before the
Supreme Court of Alabama on a petition for writ of mandamus,
arguing that the case should be dismissed in light of the White
class action. In addition to the two cases noted above, in 2004
approximately 160 individual plaintiffs brought an action (Waid,
et al. v. U.S. Steel Mining Company, et al.) against
PinnOak asserting injuries arising from particulate emissions
from the Concord Coal Preparation Plant. The Waid case is also
currently pending before the Supreme Court of Alabama on a
petition for writ of mandamus, arguing that the case should be
dismissed in light of the White class action.
In 2006, in Gamble, et al. v. PinnOak Resources, LLC, et al., 13
plaintiffs brought an action against PinnOak related to the
operation of the Concord Coal Preparation Plant. These
plaintiffs asserted that dangerous levels of coal dust emissions
had been allowed to accumulate at that facility. Cliffs denied
this allegation, and on April 15, 2008, the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Southern
Division, dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of
standing on the part of the plaintiffs.
Tilden Mine Threatened Pattern of
Violations. On June 17, 2008, the Mine
Safety and Health Administration, or MSHA, notified Tilden that
MSHA had conducted an initial screening of Tildens
compliance record. MSHAs notice indicated that based upon
the screening a potential pattern of violations existed at the
mine. Tilden met with MSHA on July 17, 2008 and presented a
citation mitigation plan for the operation. Subsequently, MSHA
inspected Tilden and on September 18, 2008, MSHA notified
Tilden that upon MSHAs review of the progress of the
mitigation plan its determination is that currently a potential
pattern of violations does not exist at Tilden.
Wabush Litigation. Cliffs has been named,
along with two of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Cliffs Mining
Company and Wabush Iron Co. Limited, as defendants, along with
U.S. Steel Canada, HLE Mining Limited Partnership and HLE
Mining GP Inc. (collectively referred to as the U.S. Steel
defendants), in an action brought before the Ontario Superior
Court of Justice by Dofasco. The action pertains to a
contemplated transaction whereby Dofasco
and/or
certain of its affiliates would purchase Cliffs ownership
interests and those of U.S. Steel defendants in Wabush.
After six months of negotiations with no definitive agreements
reached, both Cliffs and U.S. Steel defendants determined
to withdraw from negotiations and retain their respective
ownership interests in Wabush. Notice of the withdrawal was
delivered to Dofasco on March 3, 2008.
138
On March 20, 2008, Dofasco commenced this action against
both Cliffs and U.S. Steel. Dofascos statement of
claim demands specific performance of an alleged binding
contract for Cliffs and U.S. Steel to sell their respective
interests in Wabush with equitable compensation in the amount of
C$427 million or, in the alternative, general damages in
the amount of C$1.8 billion. Cliffs strongly disagrees with
Dofascos allegations and intends to defend this case
vigorously. On May 14, 2008, U.S. Steel defendants
filed a notice of motion to dismiss the action. Cliffs filed an
identical notice of motion on May 15, 2008. A
two-day
hearing was held on the respective motions of the
U.S. Steel defendants and Cliffs on June 23, 2008 and
June 24, 2008. A ruling from the court is still pending.
ArcelorMittal Arbitrations. On March 18,
2008, ArcelorMittal USA filed two demands for arbitration with
the American Arbitration Association, which is referred to as
AAA, with respect to the March 1, 2007 umbrella agreement
between ArcelorMittal USA and some of Cliffs operations.
In one demand for arbitration, ArcelorMittal USA alleged that
Cliffs had breached the umbrella agreement by refusing to honor
ArcelorMittal USAs revised 2008 nomination for an
additional 1,450,000 gross tons of iron ore pellets for
export to ArcelorMittal USAs facilities located outside of
the United States. In the other demand for arbitration,
ArcelorMittal USA requested a ruling from the AAA that, under
the terms of the umbrella agreement, ArcelorMittal USA may
transfer iron ore pellets purchased in 2009 and 2010 under the
umbrella agreement to any iron and steel making facility owned
directly or indirectly by Mittal Steel Company N.V., or Mittal.
Both arbitrations are in very early stages. Cliffs intends to
defend both arbitrations vigorously.
M.M. Silta, Inc. v. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc et
al. In August 2006, M.M. Silta, Inc., or Silta,
sued Cliffs and two of its subsidiaries, Cliffs Mining Company
and Cliffs Erie, L.L.C., or Cliffs Erie, for breach of two
separate contracts entered into between Silta and Cliffs Erie.
Silta alleged that Cliffs Erie had breached both a reclamation
services agreement, pursuant to which Silta recovered, screened
and loaded recovered iron ore pellets, chips and fines from the
ore yard at the former LTVSMC, and a breaker sales agreement,
pursuant to which Silta purchased for scrap certain circuit
breakers located in the processing plant at the former LTVSMC.
This dispute went to trial in March 2008. On March 13,
2008, a jury ruled in favor of Cliffs in connection with the
alleged breach of the reclamation services agreement and in
favor of Silta on the alleged breach of the breaker sales
agreement, awarding Silta $6.8 million. Cliffs filed a
motion with the trial court for judgment as a matter of law and
a motion for a new trial, both of which were denied by the trial
court. A notice of appeal was filed, but no briefs have been
filed to date.
United Taconite Air Emissions Matter. On
March 27, 2008, United Taconite received a DSA from the
MPCA alleging various air emissions violations of the
facilitys air permit limit conditions, reporting and
testing requirements. The allegations generally stem from
procedures put in place prior to 2004 when Cliffs first acquired
its interest in the mine. The DSA requires the facility to
install continuous emissions monitoring, evaluate compliance
procedures, submit a plan to implement procedures to eliminate
air deviations during the relevant time period, and proposes a
civil penalty in an amount to be determined. While United
Taconite does not agree with MPCAs allegations, United
Taconite and the MPCA continue discussions on the matter with
the intent of working toward a mutual resolution.
Maritime Asbestos Litigation. As previously
disclosed, The Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company
and/or The
Cleveland-Cliffs Steamship Company have been named defendants in
485 actions brought from 1986 to date by former seamen in which
the plaintiffs claim damages under federal law for illnesses
allegedly suffered as the result of exposure to airborne
asbestos fibers while serving as crew members aboard the vessels
previously owned or managed by Cliffs entities until the
mid-1980s. All of these actions have been consolidated into
multidistrict proceedings in the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania, whose docket now includes a total of over 30,000
maritime cases filed by seamen against ship-owners and other
defendants. All of these cases have been dismissed without
prejudice, but can be reinstated upon application by
plaintiffs counsel. The claims against Cliffs entities are
insured in amounts that vary by policy year; however, the manner
in which these retentions will be applied remains uncertain.
Cliffs entities continue to vigorously contest these claims and
have made no settlements on them.
The Rio Tinto Mine Site. The Rio Tinto Mine
Site is a historic underground copper mine located near Mountain
City, Nevada, where tailings were placed in Mill Creek, a
tributary to the Owyhee River. Site investigation and
remediation work is being conducted in accordance with a consent
order between the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection,
or NDEP and the RTWG composed of Cliffs, Atlantic Richfield
Company, Teck Cominco American Incorporated, and E. I. du Pont
de Nemours and Company. The consent
139
order provides for technical review by the U.S. Department
of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs, the
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, the NDEP and
the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation
(collectively referred to as the Rio Tinto trustees). The
Consent Order is currently projected to continue with the
objective of supporting the selection of the final remedy for
the site. Costs are shared pursuant to the terms of a
participation agreement between the parties of the RTWG, who
have reserved the right to renegotiate any future participation
or cost sharing following the completion of the consent order.
The Rio Tinto trustees have made available for public comment
their plans for the assessment of NRD. The RTWG commented on the
plans and also are in discussions with the Rio Tinto trustees
informally about those plans. The notice of plan availability is
a step in the damage assessment process. The studies presented
in the plan may lead to a NRD claim under Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. There is
no monetized NRD claim at this time.
The focus of the RTWG was on development of alternatives for
remediation of the mine site. A draft of an alternatives study
was reviewed with NDEP, the EPA and the Rio Tinto trustees and
as of December 31, 2006, the alternatives have essentially
been reduced to two: (1) tailings stabilization and
long-term water treatment; and (2) removal of the tailings.
The estimated costs range from approximately $10 million to
$30.5 million. During 2007 a number of meetings were held
with the NDEP, the EPA, and the Rio Tinto trustees (collectively
referred to as the RTAG) regarding the remedial alternatives.
Following a number of studies undertaken to evaluate the
feasibility of a modified alternative for removal of the
tailings, it was suggested that this could be the basis for a
global settlement, incorporating both site
remediation and potential NRD claims. During the fourth quarter
of 2007, initial positions for a global settlement were
exchanged between RTWG and RTAG. In recognition of the potential
for an NRD claim, the parties are actively pursuing a global
settlement that would include the EPA and encompass both the
remedial action and the NRD issues. Cliffs increased its reserve
by $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2008 to reflect
its estimated costs for completing the work under the existing
consent order and its share of the eventual remediation costs
based on a consideration of the various remedial measures and
related cost estimates, which are currently under review.
Northshore Air Permit Matters. On
December 16, 2006, Northshore submitted an application to
the MPCA for an administrative amendment to its air pollution
operating permit. The proposed amendment requested the deletion
of a term in the air permit that was derived from a court case
brought against the Silver Bay taconite operations in 1972. The
permit term incorporated elements of the court-ordered
requirement to reduce fiber emissions to below a medically
significant level by installing controls that would be deemed
adequate if the fiber levels in Silver Bay were below those of a
control city such as St. Paul. Cliffs requested
deletion of this control city permit requirement on
the grounds that the court-ordered requirements had been
satisfied more than 20 years ago and should no longer be
included in the permit. The MPCA denied Cliffs application
on February 23, 2007. Cliffs appealed the denial to the
Minnesota Court of Appeals. The court of appeals ruled in
MPCAs favor. Subsequent to the court of appeals
ruling, Northshore filed a major permit amendment on
August 28, 2008 to remove the control city requirement from
its permit. The permit amendment is currently pending.
Subsequent to the filing of the appeal, the MPCA alleged that
Northshore was in violation of the control city standard based
on new data that the MPCA collected showing that current fiber
levels in St. Paul were lower than in Silver Bay for a period in
2007. Northshore filed a motion with the U.S. District
Court for the District of Minnesota to re-open the original
Reserve Mining case, requesting that the court declare the
control city standard satisfied and the courts injunction
voided, or if the control city standard remained in effect,
clarify that it was a fixed standard set at the 1980 level
rather than a moving standard, referred to as the federal suit.
Shortly thereafter, the Save Lake Superior Association and the
Sierra Club filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the
District of Minnesota with respect to alleged violations of the
control city standard, referred to as the citizens suit. On
September 20, 2007, the court granted Northshores
motion to stay the citizens suit pending resolution of the
federal suit. A joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice
of the citizens suit is pending before the court.
The court entered an order in the federal suit on
December 21, 2007, concluding that the 1975 federal court
injunction from the case no longer had any force or effect.
However, the courts order also stated that the control
city standard was a state permit requirement that can only be
addressed in state court. While the determination that the 1975
federal injunction no longer has any effect is favorable,
Northshore is currently analyzing the implications of
140
the federal court order with respect to Northshores
operating permit and pending state appeal. On February 19,
2008, Northshore filed an appeal of certain aspects of the
federal courts order.
On July 28, 2008, the MPCA issued a NOV to Northshore
alleging violations related to the control city standard for the
period of March 2006 through October 2007,
specifically with respect to MPCAs interpretation of the
control city standards emission limits and related
monitoring and reporting requirements. The NOV states that
Northshore has been in compliance with MPCAs
interpretation of the standard since October 2007, but
requires corrective actions relating to operating and
maintaining facilities of treatment and control to remain in
compliance. Although the NOV does not seek civil penalties, it
contains various requests for information and reserves the right
for MPCA to take further action. Northshore disputes the
allegations contained in the NOV and is currently assessing its
legal/administrative options.
Additionally, as part of Northshores permitting of the
restart of Furnace 5, Northshore is required to certify
compliance with air emission standards within 180 days of
operation. During the scheduled compliance testing for Furnace
5, Northshore experienced abnormal operating difficulties and
was thereby unable to certify compliance. Northshore will
perform retesting as soon as Furnace 5 returns to normal
operating conditions and anticipates meeting the required
limits. Accordingly, Northshore will take appropriate steps to
establish compliance with MPCA.
American Steamship Litigation. One of
Cliffs subsidiaries, Cliffs Sales Company, currently
contracts with American Steamship Company, or ASC, for the
transportation of iron ore pellets from various ports on the
Great Lakes to a blast furnace ore dock in Cleveland, Ohio.
There are nine years remaining on that contract and Cliffs filed
suit against ASC on February 21, 2007 alleging breach of
contract and unjust enrichment claims for damages in connection
with overcharges by ASC for fuel adjustments. Cliffs also
requested declaratory relief for the fuel adjustment provisions
of the contract as well as with respect to ASCs obligation
to shuttle iron ore. On May 18, 2007, ASC filed its own
action against Cliffs Sales Company and adding Northshore Mining
Company and Oglebay Norton Marine Services Company, LLC, as
parties. ASC requested declaratory relief stating that its fuel
adjustment charges were proper and that it had no obligation to
shuttle iron ore during the winter. ASC also requested damages
in connection with an alleged anticipatory breach of the
contract based on Cliffs breach of contract claims. Both
cases were consolidated for purposes of discovery.
On May 20, 2008, a jury returned a verdict in favor of
Cliffs Sales Company with respect to overcharges for fuel
adjustments. The jury awarded Cliffs Sales Company damages
totaling $3.7 million. It was determined that Oglebay
Norton was responsible for $1.7 million of the damages and
ASC was responsible for the remaining $2.0 million of
damages to Cliffs. The jury stated that ASC could only charge an
additional half cent fuel surcharge on shuttles to a blast
furnace ore dock in Cleveland, Ohio when the ore was delivered
to Cleveland Bulk Terminal by a non-ASC vessel. The jury found
against Cliffs Sales Company finding that ASC was not obligated
to provide winter shuttle service. Cliffs Sales Company filed a
motion for the payment of interest on the amounts due to Cliffs
Sales Company, as well as for Cliffs costs for trying. ASC
and Oglebay Nortons motions for new trial and for judgment
as a matter of law were denied. Both ASC and Oglebay Norton have
agreed not to file an appeal.
West Virginia Flood Litigation. As of February
2008, Cliffs Pinnacle Mining Company has been named as a
defendant in six lawsuits brought against over sixty defendants
who were allegedly involved in land disturbing activities
(primarily mining or logging) in Wyoming County, West Virginia.
In each case the plaintiffs allege that these activities in
Wyoming County resulted in flooding on or after July 8,
2001. The plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction and unstated
personal and property damages under a number of legal theories.
Cliffs is currently investigating these cases. Cliffs intends to
defend these cases vigorously.
141
INFORMATION
ABOUT ALPHA
Alpha is a leading Appalachian coal supplier. Alpha produces,
processes and sells steam and metallurgical coal from eight
regional business units, which, as of June 30, 2008, were
supported by 32 active underground mines, 26 active surface
mines and 11 preparation plants located throughout Virginia,
West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania, as well as a road
construction business in West Virginia and Virginia that
recovers coal. Alpha is also actively involved in the purchase
and resale of coal mined by others, the majority of which Alpha
blends with coal produced from its mines, allowing it to realize
a higher overall margin for the blended product than it would be
able to achieve selling these coals separately.
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008,
sales of steam coal were 4.4 and 8.3 million tons,
respectively, and accounted for approximately 56% and 57%,
respectively, of Alphas coal sales volume. For the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, sales of metallurgical
coal, which generally sells at a premium over steam coal, were
3.4 and 6.3 million tons, respectively, and accounted for
approximately 44% and 43%, respectively of Alphas sales
volume. Alphas sales of steam coal were made to large
utilities and industrial customers in the Eastern region of the
United States, and its sales of metallurgical coal were made to
steel companies in the Northeastern and Midwestern regions of
the United States and in several countries in Europe, South
America, Africa and Asia. Approximately 52% of Alphas coal
sales and freight revenue in the first six months of 2008 was
derives from sales made outside the United States, primarily in
Turkey, Brazil, Egypt, Hungary, Canada and Russia.
As of December 31, 2007, Alpha owned or leased
617.5 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves. Of
Alphas total proven and probable reserves, approximately
82% are low sulfur reserves, with approximately 57% having
sulfur content below 1%. Approximately 89% of Alphas total
proven and probable reserves have a high Btu content which
creates more energy per unit when burned compared to coals with
lower Btu content.
Additional information about Alpha and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 239.
The principal executive office of Alpha is located at One Alpha
Place, P.O. Box 2345, Abingdon, Virginia, and its
telephone number is
(276) 691-4410.
142
MATERIAL
CONTRACTS BETWEEN CLIFFS AND ITS AFFILIATES AND ALPHA AND ITS
AFFILIATES
Other than the merger agreement, the Confidentiality Agreement
dated June 21, 2007, between Alpha and Cliffs, and the
Clean Team Confidentiality Agreement dated June 24, 2008
between Alpha and Cliffs, there are no other material contracts
between Cliffs and its affiliates, on the one hand, and Alpha
and its affiliates, on the other hand.
As of the date of the merger agreement, no executive officer or
director of Alpha had any arrangement or understanding with
Cliffs regarding employment with or provision of services to the
combined company, except as described in the merger agreement
and this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See The Merger
Agreement Directors and Officers of the Surviving
Company on page 97 and The Merger
Interests of Alpha Executive Officers and Directors in the
Merger beginning on page 83. As of the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, no executive officer of
Alpha has entered into any agreement with Cliffs as to terms and
conditions of employment with the combined company.
143
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF CLIFFS
Any information required to be disclosed and not already
included in this Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Cliffs
section is disclosed in documents incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can
Find More Information beginning on page 239.
Overview
Cliffs is an international mining company, the largest producer
of iron ore pellets in North America, and a major supplier of
metallurgical coal to the global steelmaking industry. Cliffs
operates six iron ore mines located in Michigan, Minnesota and
Eastern Canada, and three coking coal mines in West Virginia and
Alabama. Cliffs owns a majority control interest in Portman, a
large iron ore mining company in Australia, serving the Asian
iron ore markets with direct-shipping fines and lump ore. Cliffs
also owns a 30 percent interest in Amapá, a Brazilian
iron ore project, and a 45 percent economic interest in
Sonoma, an Australian coking and thermal coal project.
Cliffs continued to deliver strong financial performance in 2007
and the first six months of 2008. Revenues for 2007 increased to
$2.3 billion, with net income of $2.57 per diluted share.
This compares with revenues of $1.9 billion and net income
of $2.60 per diluted share in 2006. Revenues for the first six
months of 2008 increased to $1.5 billion, with net income
of $2.73 per diluted share. This compares with revenues of
$0.9 billion and net income of $1.14 per diluted share in
the first six months of 2007.
Global crude steel growth, a significant driver of Cliffs
business, was up approximately seven percent in 2007 from 2006
and up approximately six percent for the first six months of
2008 from the prior period with supply and demand of steel raw
materials extremely tight. In North America, the relining of two
of Cliffs customers blast furnaces, as well as
softness in steel pricing over the summer, did not prevent
Cliffs from reaching 22 million sales tons of iron ore in
North America in 2007. Reasonable industry fundamentals returned
in the fall of 2007 and most producers reacted to lower service
center inventories by achieving multiple rounds of price
increases. Steelmakers in China continue their strong demand for
iron ore as Cliffs Asia-Pacific Iron Ore segment produced
near capacity with over eight million sales tonnes in 2007.
World-wide demand for metallurgical coal increased throughout
2007 and the first six months of 2008 as port constraints in
Australia and production problems at large mines in the United
States continued to place upward pressure on pricing.
Cliffs is engaged with expanding its leadership position in the
industry by focusing on high product quality, technical
excellence, superior relationships with its customers and
partners and improved operational efficiency through cost saving
initiatives. Cliffs operates a fully-equipped research and
development facility in Ishpeming, Michigan. Cliffs
research and development group is staffed with experienced
engineers and scientists and is organized to support the
geological interpretation, process mineralogy, mine engineering,
mineral processing, pyrometallurgy, advanced process control and
analytical service disciplines. Cliffs research and
development group is also utilized by iron ore pellet customers
for laboratory testing and simulation of blast furnace
conditions.
Segments
Cliffs organizes its business according to product category and
geographic location: North American Iron Ore, North
American Coal, Asia-Pacific Iron Ore, Asia-Pacific Coal and
Latin American Iron Ore. The Asia-Pacific Coal and Latin
American Iron Ore businesses do not meet the criteria for
reporting segments and are in the early stages of production.
The North American Iron Ore segment is comprised of Cliffs
interests in six North American mines that provide iron ore to
the integrated steel industry. The North American Coal segment
is comprised of Cliffs three North American coal mines
that provide metallurgical coal to the integrated steel
industry. The Asia-Pacific Iron Ore segment, comprised of
Cliffs interests in Portman, is located in Western
Australia and provides iron ore to steel producers in China and
Japan. There are no intersegment revenues.
144
The Asia-Pacific Coal operating segment is comprised of
Cliffs 45 percent economic interest in Sonoma,
located in Queensland, Australia, which is in the early stages
of production. The Latin American Iron Ore operating segment is
comprised of Cliffs 30 percent Amapá
interest in Brazil, which is also in the early stages of
production. As a result, the Asia-Pacific Coal and Latin
American Iron Ore operating segments do not meet reportable
segment disclosure requirements and therefore are not separately
reported.
Cliffs Asia-Pacific headquarters are located in Perth,
Australia. Cliffs Latin American headquarters are located in Rio
de Janeiro, Brazil. Cliffs International Mineração
Brasil, Ltda and Cliffs
Asia-Pacific
Pty Limited provide technical and administrative support for
Cliffs assets in Latin America and Australia,
respectively, as well as new business development services in
these regions. All North American business segments are
headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio. Offices in Duluth, Minnesota,
have shared services groups supporting the North American
business segments. Cliffs Technology Group is located in
Ishpeming, Michigan.
Cliffs evaluates segment performance based on sales margin,
defined as revenues less cost of goods sold identifiable to each
segment. This measure of operating performance is an effective
measurement as Cliffs focuses on reducing production costs
throughout Cliffs.
See Note 6 of the Cliffs unaudited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and Note 4 of the Cliffs audited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007,
which are included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, for further information.
Growth
Strategy and Strategic Transactions
Cliffs expects to grow its business and presence as an
international mining company by expanding both geographically
and through the minerals that Cliffs mines and markets.
Cliffs investments in Australia and Latin America, as well
as acquisitions in minerals outside of iron ore, such as coal,
illustrate the execution of this strategy. In 2007 and the first
six months of 2008, Cliffs continued its strategic
transformation to an international mining company through the
following acquisitions and partnerships:
AusQuest. On September 11, 2008, Cliffs, through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Cliffs Australia Holdings Pty Ltd,
announced a strategic alliance and subscription and option
agreement with a diversified Australian exploration company,
AusQuest. Under the agreement reached, Cliffs will acquire a
30 percent fully diluted interest in AusQuest through a
staged issue of shares and options. Subject to AusQuests
shareholders and Australian Foreign Investment Review Board
approval, Cliffs will make an initial A$26 million
subscription at A$0.40 per share and appoint a representative to
the AusQuest board. This strategic alliance provides Cliffs with
both the right to support AusQuests future raising of
capital, as well as certain rights in relation to any future
sale or other disposal of AusQuests explorative assets.
United Taconite. On July 11, 2008, Cliffs
signed and closed on the acquisition of the remaining
30 percent interest in United Taconite, with an effective
date of July 1, 2008. Upon consummation of the purchase,
Cliffs ownership interest increased from 70 percent
to 100 percent. Consideration paid for the acquisition was
a combination of $100 million in cash, approximately
4.3 million of Cliffs common shares and 1.2 million
tons of iron ore pellets to be provided throughout 2008 and 2009.
Capital Improvement and Capacity Expansion
Projects. In the third quarter of 2008, Cliffs
announced a capital expansion project at its Empire and Tilden
mines in Michigans Upper Peninsula. The project, which
requires approximately $290.4 million of incremental
capital investment, is expected to allow the Empire mine to
produce at three million tons annually through 2017 and increase
Tilden mine production by more than two million tons annually.
This incremental production is expected to result in total
equity production of over 23 million tons annually for
Cliffs North American Iron Ore segment. Empire was
previously projected to exhaust reserves in early 2011. As part
of the capacity expansion, Cliffs will also mine additional ore
from its Tilden mine, located adjacent to Empire, and process it
utilizing additional processing capacity at Empire. Utilization
of this capacity will enable Tilden to increase production to
more than 10 million tons annually, of which
8.5 million tons represents Cliffs share. The work is
expected to begin in the last quarter of 2008, with capital
expenditures of $69.0 million, $161.5 million and
$59.9 million projected in 2008, 2009 and 2010,
respectively.
145
Portman. On May 21, 2008, Portman
announced a tender offer to repurchase up to 16.5 million
shares, or 9.39 percent of its common stock. On that date,
Cliffs owned 80.4 percent of approximately 176 million
shares outstanding in Portman and indicated it would not
participate in the tender buyback. Under the share tender
program, eligible shareholders could offer to sell some or all
of their shareholdings at a fixed-price discount of
14 percent to the volume-weighted average price of Portman
shares trade on the Australian Stock Exchange during the five
trading days after the date of the announcement. The tender
period closed on June 24, 2008. Under the buyback,
9.8 million fully paid ordinary shares were tendered at a
price of A$14.66 per share. The total consideration paid under
the buyback was A$143.3 million. As a result of the
buyback, Cliffs ownership interest in Portman increased
from 80.4 percent to 85.2 percent. In order to enable
Cliffs to move to full ownership of Portman, on
September 10, 2008, Cliffs announced an off-market takeover
offer to acquire, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Cliffs
Asia-Pacific Pty Limited, all of the shares in Portman that
Cliffs does not already own. The offer is a last and final cash
offer at a price of A$21.50 per Portman share. As of
October 21, 2008, Cliffs had received such number of the
offer acceptances that effectively increased Cliffs
ownership interest in Portman to 94.69 percent, thereby
allowing Cliffs to proceed under Australian takeover laws with
compulsory acquisition of the remaining Portman shares.
Golden West. In 2008, Portman acquired
24 million shares of Golden West, a Western Australia iron
ore exploration company, which represents approximately
17.6 percent of its outstanding shares. Acquisition of the
shares represents an investment of approximately
$27 million. Golden West owns the Wiluna West exploration
ore project in Western Australia, containing a resource of
119 million metric tons of ore. The purchase provides
Portman a strategic interest in Golden West and its Wiluna West
exploration ore project.
Polaris Land Swap. During the second quarter
of 2008, Portman announced an agreement with Polaris Metals NL
and Southern Cross Goldfields Limited, whereby Portman obtains
non-magnetite iron ore rights to a number of tenements in the
Yilgarn region, in exchange for unencumbered access by Polaris
to the Bungalbin tenements. Consequently, Portman no longer has
any interest in the Helena and Aurora Range and Bungalbin Hill
areas. This arrangement will permit tenement rationalization in
immediate mining areas and allow Portman to gain additional
prospective exploration areas.
Renewafuel. In November 2007, Cliffs acquired
a 70 percent controlling interest in Renewafuel. Founded in
2005, Renewafuel produces high-quality, dense fuel cubes made
from renewable and consistently available components such as
corn stalks, switch grass, grains, soybean and oat hulls, wood,
and wood byproducts. This is a strategic investment that
provides an opportunity to utilize a green solution
for further reduction of emissions consistent with Cliffs
objective to contain costs and enhance efficiencies in a
socially responsible manner. In addition to the potential use of
Renewafuels biofuel cubes in Cliffs production
process, the cubes will be marketable to other organizations as
a potential substitute for Western coal and natural gas. During
the second quarter of 2008, Renewafuel announced it would build
a next-generation biomass fuel production facility at the
Telkite Technology Park in Marquette, Michigan. Projected to
begin operations in the first quarter of 2009, the plant would
annually produce 150,000 tons of high-energy, low-emission
biofuel. The capital cost for the facility is estimated to be
approximately $10 million.
PinnOak. Cliffs North American Coal
segment is comprised of the PinnOak acquisition completed on
July 31, 2007. PinnOak was a privately-owned
U.S. producer of high-quality, low-volatile metallurgical
coal. The acquisition furthers Cliffs growth strategy and
expands Cliffs diversification of products for the
integrated steel industry. The purchase price of PinnOak and its
subsidiary operating companies was $450 million in cash, of
which $108.4 million was deferred until December 31,
2009, plus the assumption of approximately $160 million in
debt, which was repaid at closing. The purchase agreement also
included a contingent earn-out, which ranged from $0 to
approximately $300 million dependent on PinnOaks
performance in 2008 and 2009. On October 3, 2008, Cliffs
and the former owners of PinnOak entered into a payment
agreement, which amended the PinnOak purchase agreement to
accelerate the payment of the deferred portion of the purchase
price and the earnout. Pursuant to the payment agreement, the
estimated present value of the deferred portion and the earnout
payment was set at approximately $260 million. Cliffs
issued 4,000,000 of its common shares to the former owners in
PinnOak, which satisfied all of Cliffs payment obligations in
connection with the PinnOak acquisition. PinnOaks
operations include two complexes comprising three underground
mines the Pinnacle and Green Ridge mines in southern
West Virginia and the Oak Grove mine near Birmingham, Alabama.
Combined, the mines have rated capacity to produce
6.5 million short tons of premium-quality metallurgical
coal annually.
146
Kobe Steel Alliance. On June 19, 2007,
Cliffs entered into an alliance whereby Kobe Steel agreed to
license its patented
ITmk3®
iron-making technology to Cliffs. The alliance, which has a
10-year
term, covers use of the proprietary process in the United States
and Canada, Australia and Brazil, and may be expanded to include
other geographic regions. Used for the production of high-purity
iron nuggets containing more than 96 percent iron, the
ITmk3®
process provides the means to create high-quality raw materials
for electric arc furnaces, or EAFs, a market that Cliffs does
not currently supply. Steel producers utilizing EAFs currently
account for 60 percent of North Americas steelmaking
capacity. On August 22, 2007, IronUnits LLC and its joint
venture partner, Kobe Iron Nugget LLC formed Michigan Iron
Nugget LLC. This new entity is the first manifestation of the
Cliffs/Kobe alliance and will oversee the feasibility stage of
building a commercial iron nugget plant in Marquette County,
Michigan.
Sonoma. On April 18, 2007, Cliffs
executed agreements to participate in Sonoma, a coking and
thermal coal project located in Queensland, Australia. As of
December 31, 2007, Cliffs invested $120.1 million to
acquire and develop mining tenements and related infrastructure
including the construction of a washplant, which will produce
coal to meet the growing global demand. Cliffs total
investment in Sonoma is estimated to be $127.7 million.
Immediately preceding Cliffs investment in Sonoma,
QCoal Pty Ltd, which is referred to as QCoal, owned
exploration permits and applications for mining leases for the
real estate that is involved in Sonoma, or the Sonoma mining
assets; however, development of the Sonoma mining assets
requires significant infrastructure including the construction
of a rail loop and related equipment, referred to as the Sonoma
non-mining assets, and a facility that prepares the extracted
coal for sale, or the Sonoma washplant. Pursuant to a
combination of interrelated agreements creating a structure
whereby Cliffs owns 100 percent of the Sonoma washplant,
8.33 percent of the Sonoma mining assets and
45 percent of the Sonoma non-mining assets, Cliffs obtained
a 45 percent economic interest in the collective operations
of Sonoma.
Mining operations reached a milestone in December 2007, when the
first coal was extracted from the mine. Severe flooding at the
mine in mid-February 2008 caused a delay in previously scheduled
shipments. Incorporating the effects of the flooding, Cliffs
expects total production of 2.0 million tonnes for 2008 and
three to four million tonnes annually in 2009 and beyond.
Production will include a mix of hard coking coal and thermal
coal.
Amapá. On March 5, 2007, Cliffs
acquired a 30 percent interest in Amapá, a Brazilian
iron ore project, through the acquisition of 100 percent of
the shares of Centennial Asset Participacoes Amapá S.A.,
which is referred to as Centennial Amapá, for approximately
$133 million. The remaining 70 percent of Amapá
was owned by MMX, which managed the construction and operations
of Amapá while Cliffs supplied supplemental technical
support. On August 5, 2008, Anglo American plc acquired a
controlling interest in MMXs 51 percent interest in
the Minas-Rio iron ore project and its 70 percent interest
in Amapá.
Total project funding requirements are estimated to be between
$550 and $650 million (Cliffs share $165 million
to $195 million), including approximately $415 million
to $490 million (Cliffs share $125 million to
$147 million) to be funded with project debt, and
approximately $135 million to $160 million
(Cliffs share $40 million to $48 million) to be
funded with equity contributions. As of June 30, 2008,
Amapá had long-term project debt outstanding of
approximately $338 million, for which Cliffs has provided a
several guarantee of its 30 percent share. Amapá has
engaged in ongoing discussions with its lenders regarding loan
amendments to address several loan covenant violations related
to project delays, higher construction expenditures,
debt-to-equity ratios and deliveries under its long-term supply
agreement with an operator of an iron ore pelletizing plant in
the Kingdom of Bahrain. In addition, on June 30, 2008,
Amapá had total short-term loans outstanding of
$188.9 million. Cliffs subsequently provided a several
guarantee in July 2008 on its 30 percent share of the total
debt outstanding, or $159.1 million.
Amapá consists of a significant iron ore deposit, a
192-kilometer
railway connecting the mine location to an existing port
facility and 71 hectares of real estate on the banks of the
Amazon River, reserved for a loading terminal. Amapá began
production of sinter fines in late-December 2007. Anglo-American
has indicated to Cliffs that it plans to complete construction
of the concentrator and continue to
ramp-up
operations. Production and sales for 2008 are expected to total
approximately one million tonnes for 2008, down from a previous
estimate of three million tonnes. Based on this production
delay, Cliffs expects to incur significant equity losses in 2008.
147
Safety
Safety remains the No. 1 priority within Cliffs.
Cliffs continuous improvement efforts in this area
resulted in a reportable incident rate, as defined by MSHA, of
1.93 in North America, or 38 basis points below last
years result of 2.31. Cliffs newly acquired North
American Coal operations achieved a 6.09 reportable incident
rate since the July 31, 2007 acquisition. The MSHA
reportable incident rate at underground bituminous coal mines
was 7.36 for 2006.
At Cliffs Asia-Pacific Iron Ore operations,
Koolyanobbings Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate, or LTIFR,
for 2007 was 4.14, which is higher than 2006 result of 3.5.
During 2007, six Lost Time Injuries, or LTIs, were recorded at
the Koolyanobbing operation. At Cockatoo Island, three
LTIs were incurred, resulting in a LTIFR of 6.1 for the
year, compared with two LTIs, resulting in a LTIFR of 7.87
in 2006. Asia-Pacific Iron Ore safety statistics include
employees and contractors.
Results
of Operations
Three-
and Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Three-
and Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2007
North
American Iron Ore
Following is a summary of North American Iron Ore results for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Change Due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Freight and
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
and Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Reimbursements
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
643.4
|
|
|
$
|
432.8
|
|
|
$
|
202.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
210.6
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expense
|
|
|
(370.8
|
)
|
|
|
(328.4
|
)
|
|
|
(35.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(42.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
$
|
272.6
|
|
|
$
|
104.4
|
|
|
$
|
167.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
168.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tons
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a summary of North American Iron Ore results for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Change Due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Freight and
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
and Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Reimbursements
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
922.2
|
|
|
$
|
658.0
|
|
|
$
|
229.8
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
|
$
|
264.2
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expense
|
|
|
(585.0
|
)
|
|
|
(516.3
|
)
|
|
|
(39.3
|
)
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
|
(68.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
$
|
337.2
|
|
|
$
|
141.7
|
|
|
$
|
190.5
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
195.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tons
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sales revenue increase for the second quarter and first half
of 2008 was primarily due to higher sales prices combined with
slight increases in sales volume. Sales price increases of
approximately 56 percent in the quarter and 42 percent
for the year to date primarily reflected the impact from higher
steel prices, renegotiated and new long-term supply agreements
with certain customers and other contractual price adjustment
factors. Included in second quarter 2008 revenues was
$84.3 million related to supplemental steel payments,
compared with $20.0 million for the same period last year.
For the first half of 2008, revenue included $110.3 million
related to the supplemental payments compared with
$29.6 million for the first six months of 2007. The higher
sales volume for both the quarter and first half of 2008 is
primarily due to increased demand.
148
In addition, based on settlement of 87 percent price
increases in the iron ore pellet benchmarks referenced in
certain of Cliffs North American Iron Ore sales contracts,
approximately $5 million of additional product revenue, or
$0.91 per ton, related to first quarter sales was recognized in
the second quarter of 2008 upon settlement.
On May 30, 2008, Cliffs entered into a term sheet with
Algoma amending the term supply agreement with Algoma. As
previously disclosed, Algoma, a Canadian steelmaker and
subsidiary of Essar Steel Holdings Limited, had requested a
price renegotiation for 2008 pricing under the terms of the
agreement. The term sheet establishes the price for 2008 and
provides for the sale of additional tonnage to Algoma for 2008
and 2009. Pricing for 2009 and beyond will be determined in
accordance with the original terms of the agreement with Algoma.
The cost of goods sold and operating expense increase in the
second quarter and first half of 2008 was primarily due to
higher costs of production and higher reimbursable freight and
minority interest costs. Contributing to the increase in both
the second quarter and first six months of 2008 were higher fuel
and energy costs of $14.7 million and $19.1 million,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. Costs of
goods sold and operating expense for the first half of 2008 were
also higher due to major furnace repairs at Empire and United
Taconite during the first quarter.
Production
Following is a summary of iron ore production tonnage for 2008
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
First Six Months
|
|
|
Full Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)(2)
|
|
|
Mine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Empire
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Tilden
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Hibbing
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Northshore
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
United Taconite
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Wabush
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs share of total
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimate |
|
(2) |
|
Tons are long tons of pellets of 2,240 pounds. |
The increase in Hibbings production for the first six
months of 2008 compared to the comparable prior year period was
a result of the shutdown in late February 2007 due to severe
weather conditions that caused significant buildup of ice in the
basin supplying water to the processing facility. The full year
production loss in 2007 totaled approximately 0.8 million
tons (Cliffs share is 0.2 million tons).
The increase in second quarter production at Northshore was due
to reactivation of one of its furnaces at the end of March 2008.
Accordingly, production at Northshore is expected to benefit
from an incremental increase of approximately 0.6 million
tons in 2008 and 0.8 million tons annually thereafter.
Production for 2008 at Empire and Tilden was previously expected
to be 4.0 million tons and 7.9 million tons,
respectively. However, based on the recently announced capital
expansion project at the mines, Cliffs has increased its rate of
production and expects to produce 4.2 million tons at
Empire in 2008. As part of the capacity expansion, Cliffs will
also mine additional ore from its Tilden mine, located adjacent
to Empire, and process it utilizing additional processing
capacity at Empire. As a result, Cliffs expects to produce
8.4 million tons at Tilden in 2008.
149
North
American Coal
Following is a summary of North American Coal results for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except tonnage)
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
61.5
|
|
|
$
|
155.4
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expense
|
|
|
(84.5
|
)
|
|
|
(180.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
$
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tons (in thousands)
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
Production
Following is a summary of coal production tonnage for 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Full Year(1)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)(2)
|
|
|
Mine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Complex
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Oak Grove
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
1,742
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimate |
|
(2) |
|
Tons are short tons of 2,000 pounds. |
Cliffs reported losses of $23.0 million and
$25.5 million in sales margin for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, respectively. On a sequential quarter
basis, revenue decreased approximately 35 percent primarily
as a result of lower sales volume. Cliffs sold 576 thousand tons
during the second quarter of 2008 compared to 998 thousand tons
in the first quarter of 2008. The decrease in sales volume was
primarily attributable to a 27 percent decline in
production as a result of development of the longwall panel at
Cliffs Oak Grove mine. The extended development spanned
throughout most of the second quarter. In addition, Cliffs
declared force majeure on customer shipments from its Pinnacle
mine in mid-March 2008. Production at the mine slowed during the
second quarter as a result of encountering a fault area within
the coal panel being mined at the time. The force majeure was
lifted in mid-June 2008.
The costs per-ton increased approximately 58 percent from
the first quarter of 2008. As a result of lower production in
the second quarter, higher fixed costs were absorbed per ton
produced.
Longwall development timing has been extended due to the
difficulty in obtaining additional equipment and personnel.
Accordingly, Cliffs reduced the total estimated metallurgical
coal production for 2008 to approximately 3.6 million tons.
150
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Following is a summary of Asia-Pacific Iron Ore results for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Change Due to
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
and Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
268.2
|
|
|
$
|
114.8
|
|
|
$
|
172.0
|
|
|
$
|
(18.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
153.4
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expense
|
|
|
(107.3
|
)
|
|
|
(89.6
|
)
|
|
|
(32.1
|
)
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
(17.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
$
|
160.9
|
|
|
$
|
25.2
|
|
|
$
|
139.9
|
|
|
$
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
135.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tons
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a summary of Asia-Pacific Iron Ore results for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Change Due to
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
and Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
385.7
|
|
|
$
|
215.1
|
|
|
$
|
180.0
|
|
|
$
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
170.6
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expense
|
|
|
(203.4
|
)
|
|
|
(165.4
|
)
|
|
|
(45.2
|
)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
$
|
182.3
|
|
|
$
|
49.7
|
|
|
$
|
134.8
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
132.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tons
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2008, the Australian benchmark
prices for lump and fines settled at increases of
97 percent and 80 percent, respectively. As a result,
second quarter sales from Cliffs Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
segment were recorded based on 2008 settled price increases,
which reflects an incremental increase of approximately
$90.6 million when compared to second quarter revenue
measured at 2007 prices. In addition, approximately
$65.0 million of additional product revenue related to
first quarter sales was recognized in the second quarter upon
settlement of 2008 benchmark prices.
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses for the quarter and
year to date increased primarily due to higher costs of
production partially offset by lower volume. Costs were also
negatively impacted in the second quarter and first half of 2008
by approximately $10.7 million and $25.2 million,
respectively, related to foreign exchange rates, as the
U.S. dollar continued to weaken relative to the Australian
dollar. The increase in cost of goods sold and operating
expenses was also a result of higher fuel, maintenance and
contract labor expenditures arising from inflationary pressures.
Fuel and energy costs for the quarter and year to date increased
by approximately $3.5 million and $5.0 million,
respectively, compared to the comparable periods in 2007.
Production
Following is a summary of iron ore production tonnage for 2008
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
First Six Months
|
|
|
Full Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)(2)
|
|
|
Mine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Koolyanobbing
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
Cockatoo Island
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimate |
|
(2) |
|
Tons are metric tonnes of 2,205 pounds. Cockatoo production
reflects Portmans 50 percent share. |
151
Production for the second quarter and first half of 2008 was
relatively consistent with the comparable prior year periods.
Cockatoo Island production ceased at the end of the second
quarter 2008, with shipments to continue into the third quarter
2008. Construction on a necessary extension of the existing
seawall will commence in the third quarter 2008, with production
anticipated to restart by the end of the second quarter 2009.
This extension is expected to extend production for
approximately two additional years.
Other
operating income (expense)
Following is a summary of other operating income (expense) for
2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Unfavorable)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Unfavorable)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Casualty recoveries
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
Royalties and management fee revenue
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(52.1
|
)
|
|
|
(21.5
|
)
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
(96.6
|
)
|
|
|
(42.2
|
)
|
|
|
(54.4
|
)
|
Gain on sale of other assets
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
Miscellaneous net
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in selling, general and administrative expense of
$30.6 million and $54.4 million in the second quarter
and first half of 2008, respectively, compared with the same
periods in 2007 is primarily a result of higher employment
compensation and increased outside professional service fees
associated with the expansion of Cliffs business of
$13.3 million and $17.1 million for the quarter and
year to date, respectively. In addition, selling, general and
administrative expense increased in the quarter and first half
of 2008 by $5.4 million and $11.3 million,
respectively, as a result of additional corporate development
activities in Latin America and Asia-Pacific. Increases of
$3.4 million and $9.2 million for the quarter and year
to date, respectively, relate to Cliffs North American
Coal segment acquired in July 2007. Selling, general and
administrative expense for the first six months of 2008 was also
impacted by a charge in the first quarter of approximately
$6.8 million in connection with a legal case as well as
$2.1 million related to Cliffs interest in Sonoma
acquired in 2007.
The gain on sale of other assets of $19.5 million and
$21.0 million in the second quarter and first half of 2008,
respectively, primarily relates to the sale of its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Cliffs Synfuel Corp., or Synfuel, which was
completed on June 4, 2008. Cliffs recorded a gain of
$19 million in the second quarter of 2008 upon completion
of the transaction. Under the agreement, Oil Shale Exploration
Company-Skyline, LLC acquired 100 percent of Synfuel for
$24 million. As additional consideration for the stock, a
perpetual nonparticipating royalty interest was granted
initially equal to $0.02 per barrel of shale oil and $0.01 per
barrel of shale oil produced from lands covered by existing
State of Utah oil shale leases, plus 25 percent of royalty
payments from conventional oil and gas operations. Cliffs
recorded a gain of $19 million upon completion of the
transaction.
The increase in casualty recoveries for both the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the comparable prior
year periods is primarily attributable to a $9.2 million
insurance recovery recognized in the current year related to a
2006 electrical explosion at Cliffs United Taconite
facility.
152
Other
income (expense)
Following is a summary of other income (expense) for 2008 and
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Unfavorable)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Unfavorable)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
9.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.9
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in interest income for both the quarter and year to
date is primarily attributable to additional cash and
investments held by Portman during the period coupled with
higher average returns. Higher interest expense in both the
second quarter and first half of 2008 reflected borrowings under
Cliffs credit facilities and interest accretion for the
deferred payment. See Note 5 of the Cliffs unaudited
consolidated financial statements as of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2008, included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, for further information.
Income
Taxes
Cliffs total tax provision from continuing operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$121.6 million and $39.3 million, respectively. The
increase in Cliffs tax provision is attributable to higher
pre-tax income and a higher effective tax rate. For the full
year 2008, Cliffs expects an effective tax rate of approximately
26 percent, which reflects benefits from deductions for
percentage depletion in excess of cost depletion related to
U.S. operations as well as benefits derived from operations
outside the U.S., which are taxed at rates lower than the
U.S. statutory rate of 35 percent. See Note 10 of
the Cliffs unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and
for the six months ended June 30, 2008, included elsewhere
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, for further
information.
Equity
Loss in Ventures
The equity loss in ventures for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 of $6.2 million and $13.1 million,
respectively, represents the results from Cliffs
investment in Amapá. The results for the second quarter and
year to date primarily consist of pre-production and
start-up
losses of $8.4 million and $22.1 million,
respectively, including operating losses from the railroad of
$1.9 million and $3.9 million, respectively, partially
offset by foreign currency hedge gains, $2.7 million and
$8.6 million, respectively.
153
Year
Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2006
North
American Iron Ore
Sales
Margin
Following is a summary of North American Iron Ore sales margin
for 2007 versus 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Freight and
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
and Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Reimbursements
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenue from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
1,745.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,560.7
|
|
|
$
|
39.3
|
|
|
$
|
122.4
|
|
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
|
$
|
184.7
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
|
|
|
(1,347.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1,233.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(91.8
|
)
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
|
(114.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
$
|
397.9
|
|
|
$
|
327.4
|
|
|
$
|
39.9
|
|
|
$
|
30.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
70.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tons
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales revenue was due to a sales volume increase
of 1.9 million tons, or $122.4 million, higher sales
prices, $39.3 million and higher freight and venture
partners reimbursements, $23.0 million. Sales volume
in 2007 included 1.5 million tons of pellets purchased and
paid for by customers at year-end under take-or-pay provisions
of existing long-term supply agreements. First half shipments in
2007 included 1.2 million tons of pellets purchased in
upper Great Lakes stockpiles and paid for in 2006. Revenue
recognition related to the December 2006 stockpile transaction
totaling $62.6 million was deferred until the product was
delivered in 2007. Sales prices
per-ton
increased 2.8 percent, reflecting the effect of contractual
base price increases, higher term supply agreement escalation
factors including higher steel pricing, higher Producers Price
Indices and lag-year adjustments.
The increase in cost of goods sold and operating expenses
primarily reflected higher volume, $91.8 million. On a
per-ton basis, cost of goods sold and operating expenses were
flat in comparison to last year, as a result of Cliffs
strategic procurement, maintenance and other business
improvement programs, as well as the implementation of Six Sigma
and Lean Sigma. This compares with a Producers Price Indices
increase of 4.1 percent, which is a measurement of
industrial company cost inflation.
Principally, as a result this cost containment, North American
Iron Ore sales margin per ton increased 11 percent from
2006.
Production
Following is a summary of North American Iron Ore production
tonnage for 2007 versus 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Mine
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)(1)
|
|
|
Empire
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Tilden
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
Hibbing
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Northshore
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
United Taconite
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Wabush
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Long tons of pellets of 2,240 pounds. |
The decrease in Hibbings production was a result of the
shutdown in late February 2007 due to severe weather conditions
that caused significant buildup of ice in the basin supplying
water to the processing facility.
154
Year-over-year production at Tilden benefited from major
maintenance work and operating improvements performed in the
prior year, and United Taconite production increased due to its
recovery from last years electrical accident. Production
at Wabush was higher as a result of pit design improvements to
mitigate dewatering issues.
Cliffs reinitiated construction activity to restart an idled
pellet furnace at the Northshore facility that will increase
capacity by approximately 0.6 million tons of pellets in
2008 and 0.8 million tons to Cliffs annual capacity
thereafter.
North
American Coal
Sales
Margin
Following is a summary of North American Coal sales margin since
the July 31, 2007 acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except tonnage)
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
85.2
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expense
|
|
|
(116.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
$
|
(31.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tons (in thousands)(1)
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tons are short tons of 2,000 pounds. |
In August 2007, production at Cliffs Pinnacle mine in West
Virginia slowed as a result of sandstone intrusions encountered
within the coal panel being mined at the time. This slowdown
prompted the operating decision in late September to move the
mines longwall plow system to another panel. In
mid-October, the plow system was brought back into production.
In addition, Cliffs has invested in business improvement
initiatives and safety activities designed to enhance future
production at Cliffs Oak Grove mine. These investments
reduced Cliffs 2007 production.
The slowdown, and resulting lack of leverage over fixed costs,
such as labor, energy and administration, contributed to a loss
of sales margin and unusually high per-ton costs of goods sold.
However, as Cliffs builds production volumes at the
metallurgical coal mines through 2008, Cliffs cost per ton
is expected to steadily and significantly decrease.
The net impact of these factors contributed to a
$31.7 million loss of sales margin. As production volumes
build through 2008, Cliffs per-ton costs are anticipated
to steadily and significantly decrease each quarter.
Production
Following is a summary of North American Coal production tonnage
for 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
Mine
|
|
December 31, 2007(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Oak Grove
|
|
|
406
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
558
|
|
Green Ridge
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tons are short tons of 2,000 pounds. |
155
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Sales
Margin
Following is a summary of Asia-Pacific Iron Ore sales margin for
2007 versus 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change Due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales price
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
and Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenue from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
444.6
|
|
|
$
|
361.0
|
|
|
$
|
48.9
|
|
|
$
|
34.7
|
|
|
$
|
83.6
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
|
|
|
(348.8
|
)
|
|
|
(274.4
|
)
|
|
|
(48.0
|
)
|
|
|
(26.4
|
)
|
|
|
(74.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
$
|
95.8
|
|
|
$
|
86.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tonnes
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales revenue was due to higher sales prices,
$48.9 million and higher volume, $34.7 million.
Portmans sales prices reflected the effects of the
9.5 percent increase in the international benchmark price
of iron ore fines and lump. The 0.7 million tonne volume
increase reflected the completion of the two-million-tonne per
annum expansion at Koolyanobbing in late 2006.
Increased production capacity has allowed Asia-Pacific to supply
higher sales volumes at increased price realizations driven by
intense demand from the Asian steel industry, particularly in
China. As a result of this demand, revenues per tonne increased
12 percent from the prior year. Per-tonne costs in
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore, which increased 16 percent, continue
to be negatively impacted by foreign exchange rates, as the
U.S. dollar weakened relative to the Australian dollar, as
well as higher maintenance and contract labor expenditures.
Cliffs Asia-Pacific Iron Ore management team has put in
place a new contractor for mine operations that has cost control
incentives. This is expected to result in better cost control in
2008.
Production
Following is a summary of Asia-Pacific Iron Ore production
tonnage for 2007 versus 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Mine
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)(1)
|
|
|
Koolyanobbing
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Cockatoo Island
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Metric tonnes of 2,205 pounds. |
The increase in production primarily reflected the completion of
the expansion at Koolyanobbing in late 2006. Cockatoo Island
production ceased at the end of the second quarter 2008, with
shipments to continue into the third quarter 2008. Construction
on a necessary extension of the existing seawall will commence
in the third quarter 2008, with production anticipated to
restart by the end of the second quarter 2009. This extension is
expected to extend production for approximately two additional
years.
In July 2007, Portman was notified that its exploration and
mining rights under two leases would not be extended beyond
July 3, 2007. The mining leases permit Portman to explore
for and mine iron ore on mining tenements north of
Portmans Koolyanobbing operations, including the rights to
4.5 million tonnes of iron ore reserves. Portman has since
negotiated an in-principle agreement to transfer these rights to
the other party in exchange for additional mining rights to new
leases. A formal agreement to this effect is expected to be
ratified in 2008.
Other
Operating Income (Expense)
Selling, general and administrative expense of
$114.2 million in 2007 increased $41.8 million
compared with the prior year, primarily reflecting higher
employment costs related to Cliffs expanding business,
including
156
expenses at North American Coal and Cliffs Asia-Pacific
locations; increased outside professional service fees and
higher legal fees.
Gain on sale of assets of $18.4 million primarily reflected
the fourth quarter 2007 gain on the sale of portions of the
former LTVSMC site. The sale included cash proceeds of
approximately $18 million.
Miscellaneous-net
expense of $2.3 million in 2007 increased
$14.7 million compared with the prior year, primarily
reflecting increased mark-to-market hedging losses at
Cliffs Asia-Pacific Iron Ore business.
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest income of $20.0 million increased
$2.8 million compared with 2006, reflecting average higher
cash and investment balances and higher average interest rates
in Cliffs Asia-Pacific iron ore business.
Interest expense of $22.6 million increased
$17.3 million compared with 2006, primarily reflecting
borrowings from the credit facility to fund the acquisition of
PinnOak.
Income
Taxes
Income tax expense of $84.1 million in 2007 was
$6.8 million lower than the comparable amount in 2006. The
decrease was due to lower pre-tax income in 2007 and a lower
effective tax rate. See Note 9 of the Cliffs audited
consolidated financial statements as of and for the three years
ended December 31, 2007, included elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
Minority
Interest
Minority interest decreased $1.5 million, or nine percent
from 2006. Minority interest represents the 19.6 percent
minority interest related to Asia-Pacific iron ore earnings.
Equity
Loss in Ventures
The equity loss in ventures in 2007 of $11.2 million
represents the results from Cliffs investment in
Amapá, primarily pre-production costs of $7.2 million
and operating losses from the railroad of $4.0 million.
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2005
North
American Iron Ore
Sales
Margin
Following is a summary of North American Iron Ore sales margin
for 2006 versus 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change Due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Freight and
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
and Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Reimbursements
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenue from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
1,560.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,535.0
|
|
|
$
|
111.6
|
|
|
$
|
(111.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
25.3
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
|
|
|
(1,233.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1,176.4
|
)
|
|
|
(112.3
|
)
|
|
|
80.7
|
|
|
|
(25.3
|
)
|
|
|
(56.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
$
|
327.4
|
|
|
$
|
358.6
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(31.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tons
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales revenue was due to higher sales prices in
2006, $111.6 million and higher freight and venture
partners reimbursements, partially offset by a sales
volume decrease of 1.9 million tons, or
$111.2 million. The 9.3 percent increase in sales
prices primarily reflected the effect of contractual base price
increases, higher term supply agreement escalation factors
including higher steel pricing, higher Producers Price Indices
and lag-year adjustments, partially offset by the impact of
lower international benchmark pellet prices. The price of blast
furnace pellets for Eastern Canadian producers decreased
3.5 percent. Included in 2006 revenues were approximately
157
1.3 million tons of 2006 sales at 2005 contract prices and
$21.6 million of revenue related to pricing adjustments on
2005 sales.
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses in 2006 increased
$56.9 million or approximately five percent. The increase
reflected higher unit production costs of $112.3 million
and higher freight and venture partners cost
reimbursements, $25.3 million. Lower sales volume reduced
costs $80.7 million. On a per-ton basis, cost of goods sold
and operating expenses increased approximately 13 percent,
primarily due to higher maintenance activity, increased energy
and supply pricing, increased stripping and higher employment
costs. Production costs were also impacted by an approximate
$15 million cost effect related to production curtailments
caused by the October 12, 2006 explosion at the United
Taconite processing plant.
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Mine
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)(1)
|
|
|
Empire
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Tilden
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Hibbing
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Northshore
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
United Taconite
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Wabush
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Long tons of pellets of 2,240 pounds. |
Production at Tilden in 2006 was lower than the previous year
due to unplanned equipment repairs and a change in mix to
produce more magnetite pellets to fulfill customer requirements.
Magnetite pellets have lower productivity than hematite pellets.
The decrease in United Taconite production was due to the
electrical explosion at the United Taconite processing plant on
October 12, 2006. Production at the United Taconite plant
was temporarily curtailed as a result of the loss of electrical
power resulting from the explosion. Repairs to the plants
Line 2 were completed and full production resumed in January
2007.
Crude ore mining at Wabush was significantly impacted by pit
de-watering difficulties, which adversely impacted production
and costs.
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Sales
Margin
Following is a summary of Asia-Pacific Iron Ore sales margin for
2006 versus 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change Due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
and Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenue from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
361.0
|
|
|
$
|
204.5
|
|
|
$
|
51.5
|
|
|
$
|
105.0
|
|
|
$
|
156.5
|
|
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
|
|
|
(274.4
|
)
|
|
|
(174.1
|
)
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
(89.4
|
)
|
|
|
(100.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
$
|
86.6
|
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
|
$
|
40.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.6
|
|
|
$
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tonnes
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents results since the March 31, 2005 acquisition. |
158
Sales revenue increased $156.5 million or approximately
77 percent. The increase in sales revenue was due to higher
volume, $105.0 million and higher sales prices,
$51.5 million. The 2.5 million tonne volume increase
reflected the expansion of the Koolyanobbing operations in 2006
and the exclusion of sales prior to the March 31, 2005
acquisition. Asia-Pacific iron ore sales prices include the
effects of a 19 percent increase in the international
benchmark price of iron ore fines and lump.
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses increased
$100.3 million or approximately 58 percent. The
increase primarily reflected the effect of higher volume and an
increase in unit production costs, primarily higher contract
labor.
Production
Following is a summary of Asia-Pacific Iron Ore production
tonnage for 2006 versus 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Mine
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)(1)
|
|
|
Koolyanobbing
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Cockatoo Island
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Metric tonnes of 2,205 pounds. |
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore 2005 production reflects results since the
March 31, 2005 acquisition. An expansion of the
Koolyanobbing facility was completed in 2006 that increased the
Portmans wholly-owned production capacity from six to
eight million tonnes per annum.
Other
Operating Income (Expense)
Casualty recoveries in 2005 of $12.3 million related to a
five-week production curtailment at the Empire and Tilden mines
in 2003 due to the loss of electric power as a result of
flooding in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Cliffs recovered a
portion of Cliffs deductible in 2007, totaling
$3.2 million.
Selling, general and administrative expenses of
$72.4 million in 2006 increased $10.3 million compared
with the prior year, reflecting increased outside professional
services and full-year expense at Cliffs Asia-Pacific iron
ore business and a $3.0 million property damage insurance
deductible associated with the electrical explosion at United
Taconite, partially offset by lower incentive compensation.
Miscellaneous-net
income of $12.4 million in 2006 was $8.2 million
higher than the prior year, primarily reflecting higher
mark-to-market currency gains at Portman and higher customer
bankruptcy recoveries related to WCIs 2003 bankruptcy
filing.
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest income of $17.2 million in 2006 was
$3.3 million higher than the prior year, reflecting higher
average cash balances and higher interest rates.
Income
Taxes
During 2005, an $8.9 million adjustment to reverse a
valuation allowance on net operating losses attributable to
pre-consolidated separate return years of one of Cliffs
subsidiaries was recognized. Excluding the $8.9 million
reversal in 2005, income tax expense of $90.9 million in
2006 was $2.8 million lower than the comparable amount last
year. The decrease was due to a lower effective tax rate,
partially offset by higher pre-tax income in 2006. See
Note 9 of the Cliffs audited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the three years ended December 31,
2007, included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, for further information.
159
Minority
Interest
Minority interest increased $7.0 million, or almost
70 percent from the prior year. Minority interest
represents the 19.6 percent minority interest related to
Cliffs Asia-Pacific iron ore earnings.
Discontinued
Operations
Cliffs arrangements with C.V.G. Ferrominera Orinoco C.A.
of Venezuela, which is referred to as Ferrominera, a
government-owned company responsible for the development of
Venezuelas iron ore industry, to provide technical
assistance in support of improving operations of a
3.3 million tonne per year pelletizing facility, were
terminated in the third quarter of 2005. Cliffs recorded
after-tax income of $0.2 million related to this contract
in 2006, compared with 2005 after-tax expense of
$1.7 million, which included Cliffs exit costs.
On July 23, 2004, Cliffs and Associated Limited, which is
referred to as CAL, an affiliate of Cliffs jointly owned by a
subsidiary of Cliffs (82.3945 percent) and Outotec
(17.6055 percent), a German company (formerly known as
Lurgi Metallurgie GmbH), completed the sale of CALs Hot
Briquette Iron facility located in Trinidad and Tobago to
ArcelorMittal USA. Terms of the sale included a purchase price
of $8.0 million plus assumption of liabilities.
ArcelorMittal USA closed this facility at the end of 2005.
Cliffs recorded after-tax income of $0.1 million in 2006,
compared with after-tax income of $0.9 million in 2005.
The results of discontinued operations for CAL and Ferrominera
were recorded under Income (Loss) from Discontinued
Operations in the Statements of Consolidated Operations.
Liquidity,
Cash Flows and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Following is a summary of key liquidity measures at
June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
320.4
|
|
|
$
|
157.1
|
|
|
$
|
351.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 credit facility
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
500.0
|
|
2007 multicurrency credit agreement
|
|
|
800.0
|
|
|
|
800.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
325.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portman facilities
|
|
|
153.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes drawn
|
|
|
(325.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loans drawn
|
|
|
(200.0
|
)
|
|
|
(200.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loans drawn
|
|
|
(160.0
|
)
|
|
|
(240.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Letter of credit obligations
|
|
|
(31.4
|
)
|
|
|
(16.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing capacity available
|
|
$
|
562.4
|
|
|
$
|
343.8
|
|
|
$
|
500.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, uses of liquidity
primarily include operational needs, general capital
requirements, and capital expenditures related to the Empire and
Tilden mine expansion project, upgrades on the rail line at
Portman between the operations and the port, and longwall system
down payments at Cliffs Pinnacle mine.
Uses of liquidity in 2007 primarily included operational needs,
capital requirements and investments in management
infrastructure related to our rapid growth and increased
business development. Capital expenditures included the
acquisition and development of mining tenements and related
infrastructure including the construction of a washplant at
Sonoma; the 0.8 million capacity expansion at Northshore
and the re-build of the substation at United Taconite resulting
from the October 2006 explosion.
160
Multicurrency Credit Agreement. On
August 17, 2007, Cliffs entered into a five-year unsecured
credit facility with a syndicate of 13 financial institutions,
which replaced a $500 million credit facility scheduled to
expire in 2011 and a $150 million credit facility scheduled
to expire in 2008. The new facility provides $800 million
in borrowing capacity, comprised of $200 million in term
loans and $600 million in revolving loans, swing loans and
letters of credit. Loans are drawn with a choice of interest
rates and maturities, subject to the terms of the agreement.
Interest rates are either (1) a range from London Interbank
Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 0.45 percent to LIBOR plus
1.125 percent based on debt and earnings or (2) the
prime rate or the prime rate plus 1.125 percent based on
debt and earnings. The credit facility has two financial
covenants: (1) debt to earnings ratio and (2) interest
coverage ratio. As of June 30, 2008, Cliffs was in
compliance with the covenants in the credit agreement.
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
(1) $160 million and $240 million, respectively,
were drawn in revolving loans, and (2) the principal amount
of letter of credit obligations totaled $31.4 and
$16.2 million, respectively, under the new credit facility.
Cliffs also had $200 million drawn in term loans as of
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Cliffs had
$562.4 million and $343.8 million of borrowing
capacity available under the $800 million credit facility,
respectively. The weighted average annual interest rate for
outstanding revolving and term loans under the credit facility
was 5.81 percent as of December 31, 2007. After the
effect of interest rate hedging, the weighted average annual
borrowing rate was 5.68 percent.
Private Placement. On June 25, 2008,
Cliffs entered into a $325 million private placement
consisting of $270 million of
6.31 percent Five-Year
Senior Notes due June 15, 2013, and $55 million of
6.59 percent Seven-Year
Senior Notes due June 15, 2015. Interest will be paid on
the notes for both tranches on June 15 and December 15 until
their respective maturities. The notes are unsecured obligations
with interest and principal amounts guaranteed by certain of
Cliffs domestic subsidiaries. The notes and guarantees are
not required to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, and have been placed with qualified institutional
investors. Cliffs used the proceeds to repay senior unsecured
indebtedness and for general corporate purposes.
The terms of the note purchase agreement contain customary
covenants that require compliance with certain financial
covenants based on: (1) debt to earnings ratio and
(2) interest coverage ratio. As of June 30, 2008,
Cliffs was in compliance with the covenants in the note purchase
agreement.
Portman. In 2005, Portman secured five-year
financing from its customers in China as part of its long-term
sales agreements to assist with the funding of the expansion of
its Koolyanobbing mining operations. The borrowings, totaling
$6.2 million at December 31, 2007, accrue interest
annually at five percent. The borrowings require principal
payments of approximately $0.8 million plus accrued
interest to be made each January 31 for the next two years, with
the balance due in full on January 31, 2010.
Effective June 23, 2008, Portman added a A$120 million
cash facility to its existing facility agreement, under which
Portman continues to maintain a A$40 million multi-option
facility. The facilities have floating interest rates of
20 basis points and 75 basis points, respectively,
over the
90-day bank
bill swap rate in Australia. At June 30, 2008, the
outstanding bank commitments totaled A$12.5 million,
reducing borrowing capacity to A$27.5 million on the
A$40 million facility. No funds were utilized on the
A$120 million facility, which expired on September 30,
2008. Both facilities have operated under the same financial
covenants of Portman: (1) debt to earnings ratio and
(2) interest coverage ratio. As of June 30, 2008,
Portman was in compliance with the covenants of the credit
facilities.
Cash and cash equivalents included $127.8 million and
$97.6 million at Cliffs Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
operations at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Amapá. At June 30, 2008, Amapá
had long-term project debt outstanding of approximately
$338 million for which Cliffs has provided several
guarantees on its 30 percent share. Amapá is engaged
in ongoing discussions with its lenders regarding loan
amendments to address several loan covenant violations related
to project delays, higher construction expenditures,
debt-to-equity ratios and deliveries under its long-term supply
agreement with an operator of an iron ore pelletizing plant in
the Kingdom of Bahrain. In addition, at June 30, 2008,
Amapá had total short-term loans outstanding of
$188.9 million. Cliffs subsequently provided several
guarantees in July 2008 on its 30 percent share of the
total debt outstanding, or $159.1 million.
161
See Note 5 of the Cliffs unaudited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and Note 6 of the Cliffs audited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007,
included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, for
further information.
Cash
Flows
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Following is a summary of cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Borrowings under senior notes
|
|
$
|
325.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
|
|
(37.7
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Purchase of minority interest in Portman
|
|
|
(137.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings (repayments) under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(80.0
|
)
|
|
|
125.0
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(59.1
|
)
|
|
|
(46.2
|
)
|
Net purchase of marketable securities
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
Investment in ventures
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(223.7
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
163.3
|
|
|
$
|
(222.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of cash flows due to changes in operating assets and
liabilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Changes in product inventories
|
|
$
|
(205.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(159.0
|
)
|
Changes in payables and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(108.4
|
)
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Changes in receivables and other assets
|
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
(48.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used by changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
$
|
(250.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(199.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs product inventory balances at June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tons(1)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tons(1)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
297.1
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
114.3
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
361.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
152.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
North American Iron Ore tons are long tons of pellets of 2,240
pounds. North American Coal tons are short tons of 2,000 pounds.
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore tons are metric tonnes of 2,205 pounds. |
The increase in North American Iron Ore pellet inventory was
primarily due to higher production volume as well as
winter-related shipping constraints on the lower Great Lakes
earlier in the year.
162
Point
Beach Nuclear Power Plant
On December 19, 2006 WEPCO entered into an asset sale
agreement to sell its Point Beach Nuclear Plant. In conjunction
with the sale, the parties to the transaction also negotiated a
long-term power purchase agreement whereby WEPCO would purchase
the capacity, energy, and ancillary services from Point Beach.
On September 25, 2007, the Michigan Public Service
Commission, which is referred to as the MPSC, issued its opinion
and order and determined that all of WEPCOs Michigan
customers, including the Empire and Tilden mines, should share
in the distribution of proceeds resulting from the sale. The
MPSC directed WEPCO to calculate an equal mills per Kilowatt
hours, or kWh, credit to be applied to customers bills for
18 monthly billing cycles following the close of the Point
Beach Nuclear Plant sale. WEPCO estimates a total of
$882 million in net proceeds resulting from the transfer of
ownership. The funds will be applied based on future consumption
by its customers beginning in December 2007 through a
$0.01581/kWh
credit. Based on WEPCOs proposal on projected electricity
usage, the 2008 distribution to Cliffs would be approximately
$32 million and will be reflected as a reduction in cost of
goods sold and operating expenses.
2007,
2006 and 2005
Following is a summary of Cliffs cash flows for 2007, 2006
and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Acquisition of PinnOak (net of $2.6 million of cash
acquired)
|
|
$
|
(343.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(199.5
|
)
|
|
|
(119.5
|
)
|
|
|
(97.8
|
)
|
Investment in ventures
|
|
|
(180.6
|
)
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
Repayment of PinnOak debt
|
|
|
(159.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net purchase of marketable securities
|
|
|
(44.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on common and preferred stock
|
|
|
(26.4
|
)
|
|
|
(25.8
|
)
|
|
|
(18.7
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(121.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings under credit facility
|
|
|
440.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
288.9
|
|
|
|
428.5
|
|
|
|
514.6
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
Investment in Portman (net of $24.1 million cash acquired)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(409.0
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from continuing
operations
|
|
|
(194.6
|
)
|
|
|
158.6
|
|
|
|
(21.9
|
)
|
Cash from (used by) discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(194.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
158.9
|
|
|
$
|
(24.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 2 of the Cliffs audited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the three years ended December 31,
2007, included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, for information regarding the PinnOak
acquisition and repayment of debt as well as Cliffs
investments in ventures.
Capital expenditures included the acquisition and development of
mining tenements and related infrastructure including the
construction of a washplant at Sonoma; the 0.8 million
capacity expansion at Northshore and the re-build of the
substation at United Taconite resulting from the October 2006
explosion. Cliffs expects to fund its capital expenditures from
available cash, current operations and borrowings under
Cliffs credit facility.
Common stock repurchases in 2007 and 2006 reflected the purchase
of 90,000 shares and 6.4 million shares, respectively,
of 9.0 million shares authorized under two 2006 repurchase
programs. Also, Cliffs increased its quarterly common share
dividend to $0.0875 per share from $0.0625 per share
effective with the quarterly dividend payable on March 3,
2008 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on
February 15, 2008.
163
The decrease in operating cash flows in 2007 compared with 2006
was primarily due to changes in operating assets and
liabilities. A summary of cash due to changes in operating
assets and liabilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net proceeds of short-term marketable securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.9
|
|
|
$
|
172.8
|
|
Changes in product inventories
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(29.9
|
)
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
Changes in receivables and other assets
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
73.0
|
|
|
|
(64.8
|
)
|
Changes in deferred revenues
|
|
|
(34.2
|
)
|
|
|
62.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Changes in payables and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used by) from changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
$
|
(27.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
118.8
|
|
|
$
|
191.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs product inventory balances at December 31,
2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tons(1)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tons(1)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
114.3
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
129.5
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
152.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
150.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
North American Iron Ore tons are long tons of pellets of 2,240
pounds; North American Coal tons are short tons of 2,000 pounds;
and Asia-Pacific Iron Ore tons are metric tonnes of 2,205 pounds. |
The decrease in North American Iron Ore pellet inventory was
primarily due to higher sales volume, partially offset by higher
production. The increase in Asia-Pacific Iron Ore inventory is
primarily due to increased production attributable to the
expansion of the Koolyanobbing operations and higher opening
inventory compared with the prior year, partially offset by
higher sales.
Operating cash flows in 2005 included the proceeds from the sale
of $182.7 million of highly liquid marketable securities
used in connection with Cliffs acquisition of Portman, net
of $9.9 million purchases of auction rate securities.
Net cash from operating activities in 2007, 2006 and 2005 also
reflected $123.9 million, $95.7 million and
$86.2 million of income tax payments and
$37.7 million, $56.1 million and $55.8 million of
contributions to pension plans and VEBAs, respectively. In 2006,
Cliffs received a $67.5 million refund from the WEPCO
escrow account.
Capital
Resources
Cliffs has taken a balanced approach to allocation of its
capital resources and free cash flow. Cliffs has made strategic
investments both domestically and internationally, increased its
capital expenditures, strengthened its balance sheet, increased
funding of its employee benefit obligations and increased its
borrowing capacity.
164
Contractual
Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than operating leases primarily utilized for certain
equipment and office space, Cliffs does not have any off-balance
sheet financing. Following is a summary of Cliffs
contractual obligations at December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1 - 3
|
|
|
3 - 5
|
|
|
More
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Than 5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
555.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
114.2
|
|
|
$
|
440.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest on debt(2)
|
|
|
122.7
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
77.9
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open purchase orders
|
|
|
227.0
|
|
|
|
180.5
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum take or pay purchase commitments(3)
|
|
|
517.0
|
|
|
|
144.3
|
|
|
|
177.3
|
|
|
|
130.1
|
|
|
|
65.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase obligations
|
|
|
744.0
|
|
|
|
324.8
|
|
|
|
205.9
|
|
|
|
148.0
|
|
|
|
65.3
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension funding minimums
|
|
|
87.9
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement benefits claim payments
|
|
|
125.6
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
61.9
|
|
Mine closure obligations
|
|
|
118.5
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
FIN 48 obligations(4)
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal injury
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
PinnOak contingent consideration
|
|
|
99.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(5)
|
|
|
201.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
667.7
|
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
173.8
|
|
|
|
68.8
|
|
|
|
167.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,244.7
|
|
|
$
|
433.7
|
|
|
$
|
593.0
|
|
|
$
|
740.7
|
|
|
$
|
276.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes Cliffs consolidated obligations. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest calculated using a variable rate of 5.2 percent in
2008 and 2009 for the $200 million term debt and
5.8 percent from 2010 to 2012. Interest calculated using a
variable rate of 5.6 percent from 2008 to 2012 for the
$240 million revolving debt. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes minimum electric power demand charges, minimum coal,
diesel and natural gas obligations, minimum railroad
transportation obligations, minimum port facility obligations
and minimum water pipeline access obligations for the Sonoma
washplant. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes accrued interest. |
|
(5) |
|
Primarily includes income taxes payable and deferred income tax
amounts for which payment timing is non-determinable. |
Significant
Changes Since December 31, 2007
As of June 30, 2008 future minimum lease payment
obligations were $111.9 million and $97.1 million for
capital and operating leases, respectively. Total minimum
capital lease payments of $111.9 million include
$1.8 million and $110.1 million, for Cliffs
North American Iron Ore segment and Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
segment, respectively. Total minimum operating lease payments of
$97.1 million include $79.8 million for Cliffs
North American Iron Ore segment, $16.3 million for
Cliffs Asia-Pacific Iron Ore segment and $1.0 million
for Cliffs North American Coal segment.
In the second quarter of 2008, Cliffs finalized the purchase
price allocation related to the PinnOak acquisition. As the
acquisition involved a contingent earn-out, a liability was
recorded totaling $178.5 million, representing the
165
lesser of the maximum amount of contingent consideration or the
excess prior to the pro rata allocation of purchase price. On
October 3, 2008, Cliffs and the former owners of PinnOak
entered into a payment agreement, which amended the PinnOak
purchase agreement to accelerate the payment of the deferred
portion of the purchase price and the earnout. Pursuant to the
payment agreement, the estimated present value of the deferred
portion and the earnout payment was set at approximately
$260 million. Cliffs issued 4,000,000 of its common shares
to the former owners in PinnOak, which satisfied all of
Cliffs payment obligations in connection with the PinnOak
acquisition.
On June 25, 2008, Cliffs also completed the private
placement of $325 million of its senior notes. For more
information regarding this issuance, see Liquidity, Cash
Flows and Capital Resources Liquidity on
page 160.
On July 11, 2008, Cliffs signed and closed on the acquisition of
the remaining 30 percent interest in United Taconite, with an
effective date of July 1, 2008. Upon consummation of the
purchase, Cliffs ownership interest increased from
70 percent to 100 percent. Consideration paid for the
acquisition was a combination of $100 million in cash,
approximately 4.3 million of Cliffs common shares and 1.2
million tons of iron ore pellets to be provided throughout 2008
and 2009.
Cliffs has guaranteed additional third-party debt with respect
to Amapá since December 31, 2007. A total of
$210.3 million of additional short-term debt has been
guaranteed (Cliffs share being $63.1 million) and
approximately $90 million of additional long-term project debt
has been guaranteed (Cliffs share being $27 million)
as of October 13, 2008.
Pensions
and Other Postretirement Benefits
Three
and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Defined benefit pension expense totaled $5.4 million and
$9.2 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008,
respectively, compared with $5.2 million and
$10.4 million for the comparable periods in 2007. Defined
benefit pension expense for the first six months of 2008
decreased from the comparable prior year period as a result of
changes in the service lives of the workforce as well as
favorable experience on investments and discount rates. See
Note 8 of the Cliffs unaudited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the six months ended June 30,
2008, included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, for further information.
Other postretirement benefits, or OPEB, expense totaled
$1.2 million and $2.2 million for the second quarter
and first half of 2008, respectively, compared with
$2.4 million and $4.8 million for the comparable 2007
periods. The decrease in OPEB expense for both the quarter and
year to date was due to changes in remaining service lives of
employees and lower medical claims paid experience.
See Note 8 of the Cliffs unaudited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the six months ended June 30,
2008, included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, for further information.
Years
Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
Defined benefit pension expense totaled $17.4 million,
$23.0 million and $18.9 million for 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The decrease in defined benefit pension
expense was due primarily to the effects of greater than
expected asset returns, demographic gains and an increase in the
assumed discount rate used to determine plan obligations.
OPEB expense totaled $4.5 million, $9.8 million and
$13.7 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
decrease in OPEB expense was due primarily to the effects of
contributions made to the VEBAs during 2006, demographic gains,
greater than expected asset returns and an increase in the
assumed discount rate used to determine plan obligations.
See Note 8 of the Cliffs audited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the three years ended December 31,
2007, included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, for further information.
166
Market
Risks
Cliffs is subject to a variety of risks, including those caused
by changes in the market value of equity investments, changes in
commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates. Cliffs has established policies and procedures to manage
such risks; however, certain risks are beyond Cliffs
control.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Portman hedges a portion of its United States
currency-denominated sales in accordance with a formal policy.
The primary objective for using derivative financial instruments
is to reduce the earnings volatility attributable to changes in
Australian and United States currency fluctuations. As of
June 30, 2008, the instruments were subject to formal
documentation, intended to achieve qualifying hedge treatment,
and were tested at inception and at each reporting period as to
effectiveness. Changes in fair value for highly effective hedges
were recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.
Ineffective portions were charged to Miscellaneous
net on the Statements of unaudited condensed consolidated
operations. At June 30, 2008, Portman had
$559.2 million of outstanding exchange rate contracts in
the form of call options, collar options, convertible collar
options and forward exchange contracts with varying maturity
dates ranging from July 2008 to May 2011, and fair value
adjustments of $44.4 million, based on the June 30,
2008 spot rate. A 100 basis point increase in the value of
the Australian dollar from the month-end rate would increase the
fair value by approximately $40.1 million and a
100 basis point decrease would reduce the fair value by
approximately $49.1 million. As of July 1, 2008,
Portman discontinued accounting for those derivatives as
qualified financial accounting hedges and is accounting for the
changes in fair value of these derivatives in the statements of
consolidated operations.
Cliffs share of pellets produced at the Wabush operation
in Canada represents approximately five percent of Cliffs
North American iron ore pellet production. This operation is
subject to currency exchange fluctuations between the United
States and Canadian currency; however, Cliffs does not hedge its
exposure to this currency exchange fluctuation.
Cliffs is subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates
in Australia as a result of its operations at Portman and
Sonoma, which could impact its financial condition. Foreign
exchange risk arises from Cliffs exposure to fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates because its reporting currency
is the United States dollar. Cliffs does not hedge its exposure
to this currency exchange fluctuation. A hypothetical one
percent movement in quoted foreign currency exchange rates could
result in a fair value change of approximately $11 million
in Cliffs net investment.
Interest
Rate Risk
Interest for borrowings under Cliffs credit facility is at
a floating rate, dependent in part on the London Interbank
Offered Rate, or LIBOR, rate, which exposes Cliffs to the
effects of interest rate changes. Based on $260 million in
outstanding revolving and term loans at June 30, 2008 with
a floating interest rate and no corresponding fixed rate swap, a
100 basis point change to the LIBOR rate would result in a
change of $2.6 million to interest expense on an annual
basis.
In October 2007, Cliffs entered into a $100 million fixed
rate swap to convert a portion of this floating rate into a
fixed rate. With the swap agreement, Cliffs pays a fixed
three-month LIBOR rate for $100 million of its floating
rate borrowings. The interest rate swap terminates in October
2009 and qualifies as a cash flow hedge.
Other
Risks
Cliffs investment policy relating to short-term
investments is to preserve principal and liquidity while
maximizing the short-term return through investment of available
funds. The carrying value of these investments approximates fair
value on the reporting dates.
Approximately six percent of Cliffs U.S. pension
trust assets and two percent of Voluntary Employee Benefit
Association trusts, which are referred to as VEBA, assets are
exposed to sub prime risk, all of which are investment grade and
fully collateralized by properties. These investments primarily
include Mortgage-Backed Securities and
167
the Home Equity subset of the Asset-Backed Securities sector
with AAA and AA credit quality ratings. The U.S. pension
and VEBA trusts have no allocations to mortgage-related
collateralized debt obligations.
The rising cost of energy and supplies are important issues
affecting Cliffs production costs. Recent trends indicate
that electric power, natural gas and oil costs can be expected
to increase over time, although the direction and magnitude of
short-term changes are difficult to predict. Cliffs
consolidated North American iron ore mining ventures
consumed approximately 5.5 million Million British Thermal
Units, or MMBTUs, of natural gas and 8.9 million gallons of
diesel fuel in the first six months of 2008. As of June 30,
2008, Cliffs purchased or has forward purchase contracts for
6.9 million MMBTUs of natural gas, representing
approximately 53 percent of Cliffs 2008 requirements,
at an average price of $9.66 per MMBTU and 10.8 million
gallons of diesel fuel, representing approximately
43 percent of Cliffs annual requirements, at $3.00
per gallon for its North American iron ore mining ventures.
Cliffs strategy to address increasing energy rates
includes improving efficiency in energy usage and utilizing the
lowest cost alternative fuels. To counter the rising cost of
fuel and shrink Cliffs carbon footprint, Cliffs has made
investments in a renewable fuel company and a small natural gas
field in Kansas. Cliffs North American Iron Ore mining
ventures enter into forward contracts for certain commodities,
primarily natural gas and diesel fuel, as a hedge against price
volatility. Such contracts are in quantities expected to be
delivered and used in the production process. At June 30,
2008, the notional amount of the outstanding forward contracts
was $33.5 million, with an unrecognized fair value net gain
of $20.0 million based on June 30, 2008 forward rates.
The contracts mature at various times through December 2009. If
the forward rates were to change 10 percent from the
month-end rate, the value and potential cash flow effect on the
contracts would be approximately $5.3 million.
Cliffs mining ventures enter into forward contracts for
certain commodities, primarily natural gas and diesel fuel, as a
hedge against price volatility. Such contracts, which are in
quantities expected to be delivered and used in the production
process, are a means to limit exposure to price fluctuations. At
December 31, 2007, the notional amounts of the outstanding
natural gas and diesel forward contracts were
$52.5 million, with an unrecognized fair value gain of
$5.7 million based on December 31, 2007 forward rates.
The natural gas contracts mature at various times through
September 2009 and the diesel fuel contracts mature at various
times through December 2009. If the forward rates were to change
10 percent from the year-end rate, the value and potential
cash flow effect on the contracts would be approximately
$5.8 million.
Outlook
The information contained in this Outlook section
deals with matters relating to future, not historic,
circumstances and developments and speaks only as of
October 21, 2008. Current economic uncertainty, tightening
of credit facilities and reductions in steel production are
collectively reducing the degree of certainty with which Cliffs
can forecast near-term sales volumes. The estimates, projections
and other forward-looking statements contained in this section
are subject to change as a result of developments following that
date. Updates, if any, to the information set forth below will
be included in the documents incorporated by reference in this
joint proxy statement/ prospectus. See Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page 239.
North
American Iron Ore
Cliffs modestly increased its guidance for expected 2008
per-long ton pricing and costs and expects to realize average
per-long ton prices of $91, an increase of 38 percent from
the average price per long ton of $66 realized in 2007. This
expectation is based on an annual average hot band steel price
of $775 per long ton at certain steelmaking facilities. Cost per
long ton is estimated to average $57 for the full year, which is
consistent with prior guidance as the recent pull back in
energy-related costs has offset higher expected labor expenses
related to the new four-year collective bargaining agreement
reached with the USW in late August. This represents an increase
of 19 percent compared with the $48 per-long ton average
reported for 2007. The higher cost per long ton estimate over
2007 is the result of increasing royalty payments, energy costs,
labor costs, and maintenance activities associated with
Cliffs expansion at the Empire and Tilden mines in
Michigan.
In 2008, Cliffs expects to have equity production of
approximately 24 million long tons and sales volume of an
estimated 25 million long tons as Cliffs sells through
inventory. The increases in Cliffs equity production and
sales
168
volume from prior year are a result of the Michigan operations
expansion and the mid-year acquisition of the remaining
30 percent interest in United Taconite, combined with
continued market strength.
North
American Coal
Cliffs expects revenue per ton in its North American Coal
segment to average $93 for 2008, down from a previous estimate
of $94, and cost per short ton of approximately $97, up from a
previous estimate of $89. The increase in cost expectation is
the result of lower than planned 2008 production of
approximately 3.6 million short tons of coal, a decline
from the previously expected production of 4.0 million
short tons.
Cliffs continues to refine and enhance the long-term mine plan
and development activities at each of its North American
Coal properties. These actions are designed to optimize
production and in 2009, result in expected production of
approximately 4.7 million short tons.
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
As a result of currency exchange changes as well as the expected
sales mix between lump and fines product, Cliffs
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore segment now expects average per-tonne
revenue to be approximately $98, down from previous expectations
of $102. Cliffs expects cost per tonne in Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
of $58 consistent with its previous estimate. These estimates
represent respective per-tonne revenue and costs increases of
80 percent and 35 percent versus 2007 levels.
Full-year Asia-Pacific Iron Ore production volume is estimated
at approximately 8 million tonnes, with expected sales
volume of approximately 8 million tonnes, both of which are
consistent with prior estimates.
Sonoma
Cliffs has a 45 percent economic interest in the project
and expects total production of approximately 2.5 million
tonnes for 2008, up from a previous estimate of 2.0 million
tonnes. Sonoma is expected to have sales volumes of
2.1 million tonnes and generate average revenue of $131 per
tonne in 2008, down from Cliffs previous guidance of $142.
However, Cliffs indicated that improved efficiency in the
projects wash plant, as well as better than originally
expected coal quality coupled with an improvement in the US
dollar, have resulted in lower costs. Per-tonne costs at Sonoma
are now expected to be $73, compared with a previous estimate of
$92.
Amapá
Cliffs said its new partner in Amapá,
Anglo-American,
has closed its acquisition of MMXs 70 percent share
of the project and assumed management control over the venture.
Anglo-American
has indicated to Cliffs that it plans to complete construction
of the concentrator and continue to
ramp-up
operations. 2008 production and sales are expected to total
approximately one million tonnes, down from a previous estimate
of 3 million tonnes. Based on this production delay, Cliffs
expects to incur significant equity losses in 2008.
Other
Expectations
Total operating expenses, excluding mark-to-market adjustments
in currency hedges in
Cliffs Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore segment, are anticipated to be approximately
$140 million in 2008. Cliffs anticipates an effective tax
rate of approximately 26 percent for the year. Cliffs also
expects 2008 capital expenditures of approximately
$240 million and depreciation and amortization of
approximately $180 million, down from a previous estimate
of $190 million.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
issued FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, referred to as
SFAS 162. SFAS 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the
principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements
of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity
with GAAP. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the
SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Boards related amendments to remove the GAAP hierarchy
from auditing standards, where it has previously resided. Cliffs
is evaluating the impact
169
SFAS 162 will have on Cliffs consolidated financial
statements upon adoption, but does not expect this Statement to
result in a material change in current practice.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position, which is
referred to as FSP,
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.
This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine
the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, referred to as SFAS 142. The objective of this
FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period
of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the
asset under SFAS 141(R), and other U.S. GAAP. This FSP
applies to all intangible assets, whether acquired in a business
combination or otherwise and shall be effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years and applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired
after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. Cliffs
is currently evaluating the impact adoption of this FSP will
have on Cliffs consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,
referred to as SFAS 161. This Statement amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement 133 to provide
users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of
how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an
entitys financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. The new requirements apply to derivative instruments and
non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as
hedging instruments and related hedged items accounted for under
SFAS 133. The Statement is effective for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Early
application is encouraged. Cliffs is currently evaluating the
impact adoption of this Statement will have on Cliffs
consolidated financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
157-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement
No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address
Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13, referred to as
FSP 157-1.
FSP 157-1
amends SFAS 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from
its scope. In addition, on February 12, 2008, the FASB
issued FSP
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
amends SFAS 157 by delaying its effective date by one year
for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except
for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis. This pronouncement
was effective upon issuance. Cliffs has deferred the adoption of
SFAS 157 with respect to all non-financial assets and
liabilities in accordance with the provisions of this
pronouncement. On January 1, 2009, SFAS 157 will be
applied to all other fair value measurements for which the
application was deferred under FSP
FAS 157-2.
Cliffs is currently assessing the impact SFAS 157 will have
in relation to non-financial assets and liabilities on
Cliffs consolidated financial statements. See Note 11
of the Cliffs unaudited consolidated financial statements as of
and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, for further
information.
FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, referred to as
SFAS 159, became effective on January 1, 2008. This
standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. While
SFAS 159 became effective for its 2008 fiscal year, Cliffs
did not elect the fair value measurement option for any of its
financial assets or liabilities. Therefore, adoption of this
Statement did not have a material impact on Cliffs
consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51. This Statement
amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards
for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest
in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in
the consolidated financial statements. This Statement is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
Earlier adoption is prohibited. Cliffs is evaluating the impact
of this Statement on its consolidated financial statements.
170
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations. This Statement
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in
a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial
statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the
acquisition date fair value. SFAS 141R determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is
not permitted.
In December 2007, the EITF ratified Issue
No. 07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements,
(EITF 07-1).
The Issue defines collaborative arrangements and establishes
reporting requirements for transactions between participants in
a collaborative arrangement and between participants in the
arrangement and third parties. The ratification of EITF is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Cliffs is
evaluating the impact of this Issue on its consolidated
financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities Including
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This Statement
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value. The Statement also
establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to
facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. The Statement is effective as of the beginning of
an entitys first fiscal year that begins after
November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted. Cliffs does
not expect adoption of this Statement to have a material impact
on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157,
Accounting for Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157
clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the
assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset
or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions.
Under the standard, fair value measurements would be separately
disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy.
SFAS 157 is effective for financial assets and liabilities,
as well as for any other assets and liabilities that are carried
at fair value on a recurring basis in financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim
periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption
permitted. The FASB provided a one-year deferral for the
implementation of SFAS 157 for other non-financial assets
and liabilities. Cliffs does not expect adoption of this
Statement to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
On March 17, 2005, the EITF reached consensus on Issue
No. 04-6,
Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in
the Mining Industry,
(EITF 04-6).
The consensus clarified that stripping costs incurred during the
production phase of a mine are variable production costs that
should be included in the cost of inventory. The consensus,
which was effective for reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2005, permitted early adoption. At its
June 29, 2005 meeting, FASB ratified a modification to
EITF 04-6
to clarify that the term inventory produced means
inventory extracted. Cliffs elected to adopt
EITF 04-6
in 2005. As a result, Cliffs recorded an after-tax cumulative
effect adjustment of $5.2 million or $.09 per diluted
share, and increased product inventory by $8.0 million
effective January 1, 2005.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
See Note 1 of the Cliffs audited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007
and Notes 1 and 2 of the Cliffs unaudited consolidated
financial statements as of and for the six months ended
June 30, 2008, which are included elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations is based on Cliffs consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with the generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States, or GAAP. Preparation of financial statements requires
management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues,
costs and expenses, and the related disclosures of
contingencies. Management bases its estimates on various
assumptions and historical experience, which are believed to be
reasonable; however, due to the inherent nature of estimates,
actual results may differ significantly due to changed
conditions or assumptions. On a regular basis, management
reviews
171
the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to
ensure that Cliffs financial statements are fairly
presented in accordance with GAAP. However, because future
events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty,
actual results could differ from Cliffs assumptions and
estimates, and such differences could be material. Management
believes that the following critical accounting estimates and
judgments have a significant impact on Cliffs financial
statements.
Revenue
Recognition
North
American Iron Ore
Revenue is recognized on the sale of products when title to the
product has transferred to the customer in accordance with the
specified provisions of each term supply agreement and all
applicable criteria for revenue recognition have been satisfied.
Most of our North American Iron Ore term supply agreements
provide that title transfers to the customer when payment is
received. Under some term supply agreements, we ship the product
to ports on the lower Great Lakes
and/or to
the customers facilities prior to the transfer of title.
Certain supply agreements with one customer include provisions
for supplemental revenue or refunds based on the customers
annual steel pricing at the time the product is consumed in the
customers blast furnaces. We account for this provision as
a derivative instrument at the time of sale and record this
provision at fair value until the product is consumed and the
amounts are settled as an adjustment to revenue.
Most of Cliffs North American Iron Ore long-term supply
agreements are comprised of a base price with annual price
adjustment factors. These price adjustment factors vary from
agreement to agreement but typically include adjustments based
upon changes in international pellet prices, changes in
specified Producers Price Indices including those for all
commodities, industrial commodities, energy and steel. The
adjustments generally operate in the same manner, with each
factor typically comprising a portion of the price adjustment,
although the weighting of each factor varies from agreement to
agreement. One of Cliffs term supply agreements contains
price collars, which typically limit the percentage increase or
decrease in prices for Cliffs iron ore pellets during any
one year. In most cases, these adjustment factors have not been
finalized at the time Cliffs product is sold; Cliffs
routinely estimate these adjustment factors. The price
adjustment factors have been evaluated as embedded derivatives.
Cliffs evaluated the embedded derivatives in the supply
agreements in accordance with the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by
SFAS 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments
and Certain Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133. The price adjustment factors share
the same economic characteristics and risks as the host contract
and are integral to the host contract as inflation adjustments;
accordingly they have not been separately valued as derivative
instruments. Certain supply agreements with one customer include
provisions for supplemental revenue or refunds based on the
customers annual steel pricing for the year the product is
consumed in the customers blast furnaces. Cliffs accounts
for this provision as derivative instruments at the time of sale
and record this provision at fair value until the year the
product is consumed and the amounts are settled as an adjustment
to revenue.
Under some North American term supply agreements, Cliffs ships
the product to ports on the Great Lakes
and/or to
the customers facilities prior to the transfer of title.
Cliffs rationale for shipping iron ore products to some
customers in advance of payment for the products is to minimize
credit risk exposure. Generally, Cliffs North American
term supply agreements specify that title and risk of loss pass
to the customer when payment for the pellets is received. This
is a practice utilized to reduce Cliffs financial risk to
customer insolvency.
Revenue from product sales includes cost reimbursements from
venture partners for their share of mine costs. The mining
ventures function as captive cost companies; they supply product
only to their owners effectively on a cost basis. Accordingly,
the minority interests revenue amounts are stated at cost
of production and are offset in entirety by an equal amount
included in cost of goods sold resulting in no profits or losses
reflected in minority interest participants. As Cliffs is
responsible for product fulfillment, Cliffs has the risks and
rewards of a principal in the transaction and accordingly Cliffs
records revenue in this arrangement on a gross basis in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF,
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an
Agent, under the line item Freight and other
reimbursements.
172
Revenue from product sales also includes reimbursement for
freight charges paid on behalf of customers in Freight and
Venture Partners Cost Reimbursements separate from
product revenue, in accordance with
EITF 00-10,
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs.
Where Cliffs is joint venture participant in the ownership
of a North American iron ore mine, Cliffs contracts
entitle Cliffs to receive royalties and management fees, which
Cliffs earns as the pellets are produced.
North
American Coal
For domestic coal sales, revenue is recognized when title passes
to the customer. This generally occurs when coal is loaded into
rail cars at the mine. For export coal sales, this generally
occurs when coal is loaded into the vessel at the terminal.
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Portmans sales revenue is recognized at the free on board,
or F.O.B., point, which is generally when the product is loaded
into the vessel. Foreign currency revenues are converted to
Australian dollars at the currency exchange rate in effect at
the time of the transaction.
Certain supply agreements primarily with our
Asia-Pacific
customers provide for revenue or refunds based on the ultimate
settlement of annual international benchmark pricing provisions.
The pricing provisions are characterized as freestanding
derivatives and are required to be accounted for separately once
iron ore is shipped. The derivative instrument, which is settled
and billed once the annual international benchmark price is
settled, is marked to fair value as a revenue adjustment each
reporting period based upon the estimated forward settlement
until the benchmark is actually settled.
Litigation
Accruals
Cliffs is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims.
Cliffs is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse
judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as the potential
ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of
accrual required, if any, for these contingencies is made after
careful analysis of each matter. The required accrual may change
in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes
in approach, such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing
with these matters. Cliffs does not believe that any such matter
will have a material adverse effect on Cliffs financial
condition or results of operations.
Tax
Contingencies
Domestic and foreign tax authorities periodically audit
Cliffs income tax returns. These audits include questions
regarding Cliffs tax-filing positions, including the
timing and amount of deductions and allocation of income among
various tax jurisdictions. At any time, multiple tax years are
subject to audit by the various tax authorities. In evaluating
the exposures associated with Cliffs various tax-filing
positions, Cliffs records reserves for exposures where a
position taken has not met a more-likely-than-not threshold. A
number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which
Cliffs has established a reserve, is audited and fully resolved.
When facts change or the actual results of a settlement with tax
authorities differs from Cliffs established reserve for a
matter, Cliffs adjusts its tax contingencies reserve and income
tax provision in the period in which the facts changed or the
income tax matter is resolved.
Prior to 2007, Cliffs recorded estimated tax liabilities to the
extent they were probable and could be reasonably estimated. On
January 1, 2007, Cliffs adopted the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, referred to as FIN 48. The effects of applying this
Interpretation resulted in a decrease of $7.7 million to
retained earnings as of January 1, 2007. FIN 48
prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken
(or expected to be taken in a tax return). This Interpretation
also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax assets and
liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated
with tax positions, accounting for income taxes in interim
periods and income tax disclosures.
173
Mineral
Reserves
Cliffs regularly evaluates its economic mineral reserves and
updates them as required in accordance with SEC Industry Guide
7. The estimated mineral reserves could be affected by future
industry conditions, geological conditions and ongoing mine
planning. Maintenance of effective production capacity or the
mineral reserve could require increases in capital and
development expenditures. Generally as mining operations
progress, haul lengths and lifts increase. Alternatively,
changes in economic conditions, or the expected quality of ore
reserves could decrease capacity or ore reserves. Technological
progress could alleviate such factors, or increase capacity or
ore reserves.
Cliffs uses its mineral reserve estimates combined with its
estimated annual production levels, to determine the mine
closure dates utilized in recording the fair value liability for
asset retirement obligations. See Note 5 of the Cliffs
audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the
three years ended December 31, 2007, included elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, for further information.
Since the liability represents the present value of the expected
future obligation, a significant change in mineral reserves or
mine lives would have a substantial effect on the recorded
obligation. Cliffs also utilizes economic mineral reserves for
evaluating potential impairments of mine assets and in
determining maximum useful lives utilized to calculate
depreciation and amortization of long-lived mine assets.
Decreases in mineral reserves or mine lives could significantly
affect these items.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
The accrued mine closure obligations for Cliffs active
mining operations provide for contractual and legal obligations
associated with the eventual closure of the mining operations.
Cliffs obligations are determined based on detailed
estimates adjusted for factors that an outside party would
consider (i.e., inflation, overhead and profit), which were
escalated (at an assumed three percent) to the estimated closure
dates, and then discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free
interest rate for the initial estimates. The estimate at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 included incremental increases
in the closure cost estimates and changes in estimates of mine
lives. The closure date for each location was determined based
on the exhaustion date of the remaining iron ore reserves. The
estimated obligations are particularly sensitive to the impact
of changes in mine lives given the difference between the
inflation and discount rates. Changes in the base estimates of
legal and contractual closure costs due to changed legal or
contractual requirements, available technology, inflation,
overhead or profit rates would also have a significant impact on
the recorded obligations. See Note 5 of the Cliffs audited
consolidated financial statements as of and for the three years
ended December 31, 2007, included elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, for further information.
Asset
Impairment
Cliffs monitors conditions that indicate that the carrying value
of an asset or asset group may be impaired. Cliffs determines
impairment based on the assets ability to generate cash
flow greater than its carrying value, utilizing an undiscounted
probability-weighted analysis. If the analysis indicates the
asset is impaired, the carrying value is adjusted to fair value.
Fair value can be determined by market value and also comparable
sales transactions or using a discounted cash flow method. The
impairment analysis and fair value determination can result in
significantly different outcomes based on critical assumptions
and estimates including the quantity and quality of remaining
economic ore reserves, future iron ore prices and production
costs.
Environmental
Remediation Costs
Cliffs has a formal policy for environmental protection and
restoration. Cliffs obligations for known environmental
problems at active and closed mining operations and other sites
have been recognized based on estimates of the cost of
investigation and remediation at each site. If the estimate can
only be estimated as a range of possible amounts, with no
specific amount being most likely, the minimum of the range is
accrued. Management reviews its environmental remediation sites
quarterly to determine if additional cost adjustments or
disclosures are required. The characteristics of environmental
remediation obligations, where information concerning the nature
and extent of
clean-up
activities is not immediately available, or changes in
regulatory requirements, result in a
174
significant risk of increase to the obligations as they mature.
Expected future expenditures are not discounted to present value
unless the amount and timing of the cash disbursements are
readily known. Potential insurance recoveries are not recognized
until realized.
Employee
Retirement Benefit Obligations
Cliffs and its North American Iron Ore mining ventures sponsor
defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all North
American employees. These plans are largely noncontributory, and
benefits are generally based on employees years of service
and average earnings for a defined period prior to retirement.
Cliffs does not provide OPEB for most U.S. salaried
employees hired after January 1, 1993.
Pursuant to a 2003 asset purchase agreement with the previous
owner, PinnOak assumed postretirement benefits for certain
employees who will vest more than five years after the asset
purchase date of June 30, 2003. Postretirement benefits for
vested employees and those that will vest within the five-year
period subsequent to the acquisition date remain obligations of
the previous owner. PinnOak records a provision for estimated
postretirement benefits for employees not covered by the asset
purchase agreement with the former owner based upon annual
valuations.
Portman does not have employee retirement benefit obligations.
On September 12, 2006, Cliffs board of directors
approved modifications to the pension benefits provided to
salaried participants. The modifications retroactively
reinstated the final average pay benefit formula (previously
terminated and replaced with a cash balance formula in July
2003) to allow for additional accruals through
June 30, 2008 or the continuation of benefits under an
improved cash balance formula, whichever is greater. The change
increased the projected benefit obligation, or PBO, by
$15.1 million and pension expense by $1.1 million in
2006. Following is a summary of Cliffs defined benefit
pension and OPEB funding and expense for the years 2005 through
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
Funding
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Funding
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$
|
38.1
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
$
|
29.2
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
2006
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
2007
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
2008 (Estimated)
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Assumptions used in determining the benefit obligations and the
value of plan assets for defined benefit pension plans and
postretirement benefit plans (primarily retiree healthcare
benefits) offered by Cliffs are evaluated periodically by
management. Critical assumptions, such as the discount rate used
to measure the benefit obligations, the expected long-term rate
of return on plan assets, and the medical care cost trend are
reviewed annually. At December 31, 2007, Cliffs increased
Cliffs discount rate for U.S. plans to
6.00 percent from 5.75 percent at December 31,
2006. Additionally, Cliffs adopted the IRS static 2023/2015
(separate pre-retirement and postretirement) table on
December 31, 2007, to determine the expected life of
Cliffs plan participants, replacing the 1994 GAM table.
Following are sensitivities on estimated 2008 pension and OPEB
expense of potential further changes in these key assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in 2008
|
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Decrease discount rate .25 percent
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Decrease return on assets 1 percent
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Increase medical trend rate 1 percent
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Changes in actuarial assumptions, including discount rates,
employee retirement rates, mortality, compensation levels, plan
asset investment performance, and healthcare costs, are
determined by Cliffs based on analyses of actual and expected
factors. Changes in actuarial assumptions
and/or
investment performance of plan assets can
175
have a significant impact on Cliffs financial condition
due to the magnitude of Cliffs retirement obligations. See
Note 8 of the Cliffs audited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the three years ended December 31,
2007 for further information.
Accounting
for Business Combinations
In July 2007, Cliffs completed the acquisition of PinnOak.
Cliffs allocated the purchase price to assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their relative fair value at the
date of acquisition, pursuant to SFAS 141, Business
Combinations. In estimating the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, Cliffs considers information
obtained during Cliffs due diligence process and utilize
various valuation methods, including market prices, where
available, comparisons to transactions for similar assets and
liabilities and present value of estimated future cash flows.
Cliffs is required to make subjective estimates in connection
with these valuations and allocations.
176
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Alpha
You should review Alphas disclosures about security
ownership of certain of its beneficial owners and management,
which are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 239.
Cliffs
Share
Ownership by Management and Directors
As of October 6, 2008, the directors and executive officers
of Cliffs controlled the voting interests of the following stock
(the percentages of beneficial ownership set forth below are
based on 113,502,463 common shares of Cliffs issued and
outstanding as of October 6, 2008):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Excluding Those Who are also
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Investment Power
|
|
|
Voting Power
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Named Executive Officers)
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
|
Sole
|
|
|
Shared
|
|
|
Sole
|
|
|
Shared
|
|
|
Class(2)
|
|
|
Ronald C. Cambre
|
|
|
20,431
|
|
|
|
20,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan M. Cunningham
|
|
|
5,588
|
|
|
|
5,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barry J. Eldridge
|
|
|
7,960
|
|
|
|
7,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan Green
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James D. Ireland III
|
|
|
1,144,422
|
|
|
|
45,966
|
|
|
|
1,098,456
|
(3)
|
|
|
45,966
|
|
|
|
1,098,456
|
(3)
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
Francis R. McAllister
|
|
|
16,499
|
|
|
|
16,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Phillips
|
|
|
34,816
|
|
|
|
34,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard K. Riederer
|
|
|
13,477
|
|
|
|
13,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Schwartz
|
|
|
19,782
|
|
|
|
19,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
|
|
|
78,868
|
|
|
|
78,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald J. Gallagher
|
|
|
132,081
|
|
|
|
132,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
69,849
|
|
|
|
69,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy L. Kummer
|
|
|
63,564
|
|
|
|
63,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald G. Stovash
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David H. Gunning
|
|
|
45,694
|
(5)
|
|
|
45,694
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,694
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group, including the
named executive officers and Messrs. Stovash and Gunning
(21 Persons)
|
|
|
1,721,439
|
|
|
|
622,983
|
|
|
|
1,098,456
|
|
|
|
622,983
|
|
|
|
1,098,456
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Under the rules of the SEC, beneficial ownership
includes having or sharing with others the power to vote or
direct the investment of securities. Accordingly, a person
having or sharing the power to vote or direct the investment of
securities is deemed to beneficially own the
securities even if he or she has no right to receive any part of
the dividends on or the proceeds from the sale of the
securities. Also, because beneficial ownership
extends to persons, such as co-trustees under a trust, who share
power to vote or control the disposition of the securities, the
very same securities may be deemed beneficially
owned by two or more persons shown in the table.
Information with respect to beneficial ownership
shown in the table above is based upon information supplied by
Cliffs directors, nominees and executive officers and filings
made with the SEC or furnished to Cliffs by any shareholder. |
|
(2) |
|
Less than one percent, except as otherwise indicated. |
177
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Of the 1,144,422 shares deemed under the rules of the SEC
to be beneficially owned by Mr. Ireland, he is a beneficial
holder of 45,966 shares. The remaining
1,098,456 shares are held in trusts, substantially for the
benefit of a charitable foundation, as to which Mr. Ireland
is a co-trustee with shared voting and investment powers. Of
such shares in trusts, Mr. Ireland has an interest in the
income or corpus with respect to 93,698 shares. |
|
(4) |
|
The named executive officers of Cliffs are its Chief Executive
Officer, Joseph A. Carrabba, its Chief Financial Officer, Laurie
Brlas, the other three highest paid employees on
December 31, 2007, William R. Calfee, Donald J. Gallagher,
and Randy Kummer, and Messrs. David Gunning and Ronald
Stovash, former Vice Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer
and President of PinnOak, respectively, who would have been
among the three highest paid employees other than the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer but for their
termination of employment during 2007. Cliffs and Mr. Kummer
terminated their employment relationship effective
October 3, 2008. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 10,000 shares beneficially owned by
Mr. Gunnings spouse. |
Stock
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners (Other than Management
and Directors)
The following table sets forth as of October 6, 2008, the
beneficial ownership of Cliffs common shares by persons known to
Cliffs to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of outstanding
Cliffs common shares, other than Cliffs directors and officers.
The percentages of beneficial ownership set forth below are
based on 113,502,463 common shares of Cliffs issued and
outstanding as of October 6, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Investment Power
|
|
|
Voting Power
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
|
Sole
|
|
|
Shared
|
|
|
Sole
|
|
|
Shared
|
|
|
Class
|
|
|
Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd.(2)
|
|
|
16,616,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,616,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,616,472
|
|
|
|
14.64
|
%
|
c/o International
Fund Services (Ireland) Limited, Third Floor, Bishops
Square, Redmonds Hill, Dublin, L2, Ireland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Under the rules of the SEC, beneficial ownership
includes having or sharing with others the power to vote or
direct the investment of securities. Accordingly, a person
having or sharing the power to vote or direct the investment of
securities is deemed to beneficially own the
securities even if he or she has no right to receive any part of
the dividends on or the proceeds from the sale of the
securities. Also, because beneficial ownership
extends to persons, such as co-trustees under a trust, who share
power to vote or control the disposition of the securities, the
very same securities may be deemed beneficially
owned by two or more persons shown in the table.
Information with respect to beneficial ownership
shown in the table above is based upon filings made with the SEC
or furnished to Cliffs by any shareholder. |
|
(2) |
|
The information shown above and in this footnote was taken from
Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on
August 14, 2008, jointly by Harbinger Capital Partners
Master Fund I, Ltd., Harbinger Capital Partners Offshore
Manager, L.L.C., HMC Investors, L.L.C., Harbinger Capital
Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P., Harbinger Capital
Partners Special Situations GP, LLC, HMC-New York, Inc., Harbert
Management Corporation, Philip Falcone, Raymond J. Harbert, and
Michael D. Luce. The address for contacting Philip Falcone,
the Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations GP, LLC,
HMC-New York, Inc. and Harbinger Capital Partners Special
Situations Fund, L.P., is 555 Madison Avenue, 16th Floor, New
York, NY 10022. The principal business address for Harbinger
Capital Partners Offshore Manager, HMC Investors L.L.C., Harbert
Management Corporation, Raymond J. Harbert, and Michael D. Luce
is 2100 Third Avenue North, Suite 600, Birmingham, AL,
35203. |
178
MANAGEMENT
Information
About Executive Officers and Directors of Cliffs
The following table sets forth information concerning the
individuals who serve as Cliffs executive officers and
directors as of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer
|
Donald J. Gallagher
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
President, North American Business Unit
|
William A. Brake, Jr.
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Executive Vice President Cliffs Metallics and Chief
Technical Officer
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Executive Vice President Commercial, North American
Iron Ore
|
William C. Boor
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Business Development
|
Duke D. Vetor
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Senior Vice President North American Coal
|
George W. Hawk, Jr.
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
General Counsel and Secretary
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald C. Cambre
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Director
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Director
|
Susan M. Cunningham
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Director
|
Barry J. Eldridge
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director
|
Susan M. Green
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Director
|
James D. Ireland III
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
Francis R. McAllister
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Director
|
Roger Phillips
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director
|
Richard K. Riederer
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Director
|
Alan Schwartz
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director
|
There is no family relationship between any of Cliffs executive
officers, or between any of Cliffs executive officers and any of
Cliffs directors. Officers are elected to serve until successors
have been elected. All of the above-named executive officers
were elected effective on the dates listed below for each such
officer. Each Cliffs director is elected for a one-year term
expiring at the Cliffs 2009 annual meeting and continues in
office until his or her successor has been elected and
qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or
retirement.
Joseph A. Carrabba has been Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Cliffs since May 8, 2007.
Mr. Carrabba served as Cliffs President and Chief Executive
Officer from September 2006 through May 8, 2007 and as
Cliffs President and Chief Operating Officer from May 2005 to
September 2006. Mr. Carrabba previously served as President
and Chief Operating Officer of Diavik Diamond Mines, Inc. from
April 2003 to May 2005 and General Manager of Weipa Bauxite
Operation of Comalco Aluminum from March 2000 to April 2003,
both subsidiaries of Rio Tinto plc., an international mining
group. Mr. Carrabba is a Director of Newmont Mining
Corporation.
Laurie Brlas has served as Executive Vice
President Chief Financial Officer of Cliffs since
March 2008. Ms. Brlas served as Cliffs Senior Vice
President Chief Financial Officer from October 2007
through March 2008. From December 2006 to October 2007,
Ms. Brlas served as Senior Vice President Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of Cliffs. From April 2000 to
December 2006, Ms. Brlas was Senior Vice
President Chief Financial Officer of
STERIS Corporation. In addition, Ms. Brlas is a
director of Perrigo Company.
Donald J. Gallagher has served as President, North
American Business Unit of Cliffs since November 2007. From
December 2006 to November 2007, Mr. Gallagher served as
President, North American Iron Ore. From July 2006 to December
2006, Mr. Gallagher served as President, North American
Iron Ore, and Acting Chief Financial
179
Officer and Treasurer of Cliffs. From May 2005 to July 2006,
Mr. Gallagher was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of Cliffs. From July 2003 to May 2005,
Mr. Gallagher served as Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of Cliffs. From August 1998 to
July 2003, Mr. Gallagher served as Vice
President Sales of Cliffs.
William A. Brake, Jr. has served as Executive Vice
President, Cliffs Metallics and Chief Technical Officer of
Cliffs since April 2007. Effective October 3, 2008,
Mr. Brake assumed responsibility for human resources and
labor relations. From January 2006 to August 2006,
Mr. Brake was Executive Vice President
Operations of Mittal Steel USA and from March 2005 to January
2006, he served as Executive Vice President
Operations East at Mittal Steel USA. From March 2003 to March
2005, Mr. Brake was Vice President & General
Manager of International Steel Group. From April 2002 to March
2003, Mr. Brake was a Division Manager Hot
Rolling at International Steel Group.
William R. Calfee has served as Executive Vice
President Commercial, North American Iron Ore of
Cliffs since July 2006. From 1996 to July 2006, Mr. Calfee
served as Executive Vice President Commercial of
Cliffs.
William C. Boor has served as Senior Vice President,
Business Development of Cliffs since May 2007. Mr. Boor
served as Executive Vice President Strategy and
Development at American Gypsum Co. (a subsidiary of Eagle
Materials Inc.) from February 2005 to April 2007 and Senior Vice
President Corporate Development and Investor
Relations at Eagle Materials Inc. from May 2002 to February 2005.
Duke D. Vetor has served as Senior Vice President, North
American Coal of Cliffs since November 2007. From July 2006 to
November 2007, Mr. Vetor served as Vice
President Operations North American Iron
Ore of Cliffs. Mr. Vetor was General Manager of Safety and
Operations Improvement of Cliffs from December, 2005 to July
2006. From 2003 to November 2005, Mr. Vetor served as Vice
President Operations of Diavik Diamond Mines.
George W. Hawk, Jr. has served as General Counsel
and Secretary of Cliffs since January 2005. Prior to that,
Mr. Hawk served as Assistant General Counsel and Secretary
of Cliffs from August 2003 to December 2004 and Assistant
General Counsel of Cliffs from February 2003 to July 2003. From
1998 to 2003, Mr. Hawk was Deputy General Counsel of
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
Ronald C. Cambre has been a director of Cliffs since
1996. Mr. Cambre is a former Chairman of the Board of
Newmont Mining Corporation, an international mining company
(from January 1995 through December 2001). Mr. Cambre also
served as Chief Executive Officer of Newmont Mining Corporation,
from November 1993 to December 2000. Mr. Cambre is a
Director of W. R. Grace & Co. and McDermott
International, Inc.
Susan M. Cunningham has been a director of Cliffs since
2005. Ms. Cunningham has served as Senior Vice President of
Exploration of Noble Energy Inc., an international oil and gas
exploration and production company, since May 2007.
Ms. Cunningham served as Senior Vice President of
Exploration and Corporate Reserves of Noble Energy Inc. from
October 2005 to May 2007. From 2001 to 2005, Ms. Cunningham
served as Senior Vice President of Exploration of Noble Energy
Inc.
Barry J. Eldridge has been a director of Cliffs since
2005. Mr. Eldridge is a former Managing Director and Chief
Executive Officer of Portman, an international iron ore mining
company in Australia (from October 2002 through April 2005).
Mr. Eldridge is Chairman of Vulcan Resources Ltd. and
Wedgetail Mining Limited and is Director of Mundo Minerals
Limited, all of which are listed on the Australian Stock
Exchange.
Susan M. Green has been a director of Cliffs since 2007.
Ms. Green has been Deputy General Counsel at the
U.S. Congressional Office of Compliance since November
2007. Ms. Green served as Aide to Councilmember Nancy
Floreen, Montgomery County, Maryland from December 2002 to
August 2005. Ms. Green was originally proposed as a nominee
for the board of directors by the USW, pursuant to the terms of
Cliffs 2004 labor agreement and first elected to the Cliffs
board of directors at the annual meeting in 2007.
James D. Ireland III has been a director of Cliffs
since 1986. Mr. Ireland has been Managing Director since
January 1993 of Capital One Partners, Inc., a private equity
investment firm, which through an affiliate, serves as the
General Partner of Early Stage Partners I and II L.P., two
venture capital investment partnerships. Mr. Ireland is a
Director of OurPets Co.
180
Francis R. McAllister has been a director of Cliffs since
1996. Mr. McAllister has been Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Stillwater Mining Company, a palladium and platinum
producer, since February 2001. Mr. McAllister is a Director
of Stillwater Mining Company.
Roger Phillips has been a director of Cliffs since 2002.
Mr. Phillips is a former President and Chief Executive
Officer of IPSCO Inc., a North American steel producing company
(from 1982 through 2002). Mr. Phillips is a Director of
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Imperial Oil Limited and
Toronto Dominion Bank.
Richard K. Riederer has been a director of Cliffs since
2002. Mr. Riederer has been Chief Executive Officer of RKR
Asset Management, a consulting organization, since June 2006.
Mr. Riederer served as Chief Executive Officer from January
1996, and President from January 1995 through February 2001, of
Weirton Steel Corporation, a steel producing company.
Mr. Riederer is a Director of First American Funds and the
Boler Company, Chairman and Director of Idea Foundry, and serves
on the Board of Trustees of Franciscan University of
Steubenville.
Alan Schwartz has been a director of Cliffs since 1991.
Mr. Schwartz has been a Professor of Law at the Yale Law
School and Professor at the Yale School of Management since 1987.
Appointment
of Additional Directors and Officers After the Merger
Under the merger agreement, the Cliffs board of directors is
required as of the effective time of the merger to take all
actions as may be required to appoint Michael J. Quillen (to
serve as non-executive vice-chairman) and Glenn A. Eisenberg to
the Cliffs board of directors. Further, the merger
agreement provides that as of the effective time of the merger,
Cliffs will take all actions as may be required to appoint Kevin
S. Crutchfield as president of the coal division of Cliffs.
Michael J. Quillen (age 59) has served as Alphas
Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Alpha board since
its formation in November 2004 and served as Alphas
President until January 2007. He was named Chairman of
Alphas board in October 2006. Mr. Quillen joined the
Alpha management team as President and the sole manager of Alpha
Natural Resources, LLC, Alphas top-tier operating
subsidiary, in August 2002, and has served as Chief Executive
Officer of Alpha Natural Resources, LLC since January 2003. From
September 1998 to December 2002, Mr. Quillen was Executive
Vice President Operations of AMCI, a mining and
marketing company. While at AMCI, he was also responsible for
the development of AMCIs Australian properties.
Mr. Quillen has over 30 years of experience in the
coal industry starting as an engineer. He has held senior
executive positions in the coal industry throughout his career,
including as Vice President Operations of Pittston
Coal Company, President of Pittston Coal Sales Corp., Vice
President of AMVEST Corporation, Vice President
Operations of NERCO Coal Corporation, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Addington, Inc. and Manager of Mid-Vol
Leasing, Inc. Mr. Quillen was elected to the board of
directors of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., a leading producer
of construction aggregates in the United States, in February
2008.
Glenn A. Eisenberg (age 46) has been a member of the
Alpha board since the 2005 Alpha annual meeting and is currently
Chairman of Alphas Audit Committee and a member of
Alphas Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Mr. Eisenberg currently serves as Executive Vice President,
Finance and Administration of The Timken Company, an
international manufacturer of highly engineered bearings, alloy
and specialty steel and components and a provider of related
products and services. Prior to joining The Timken Company in
2002, Mr. Eisenberg served as President and Chief Operating
Officer of United Dominion Industries, a manufacturer of
proprietary engineered products, from 1999 to 2001, and as the
President Test Instrumentation Segment and Executive
Vice President for United Dominion Industries from 1998 to 1999.
Mr. Eisenberg also serves as a director and chairman of the
audit committee of Family Dollar Stores, Inc., owners and
operators of discount stores throughout the United States.
Kevin S. Crutchfield (age 47) has served as Alpha
President since January 2007 and as a member of Alpha Board
since November 2007. Prior to that time, Mr. Crutchfield
served as Alpha Executive Vice President since Alphas
formation in November 2004. Mr. Crutchfield joined the
Alpha management team as the Executive Vice President of Alpha
Natural Resources, LLC and Vice President of ANR Holdings, LLC
in March 2003, and also served as the Executive Vice President
of ANR Holdings, LLC from November 2003 until ANR Holdings was
merged with another of Alphas subsidiaries in December
2005. From June 2001 through January 2003, he was Vice
181
President of El Paso Corporation, a natural gas and energy
provider, and President of Coastal Coal Company, a coal producer
and affiliate of El Paso Corporation acquired by Alpha in
2003. Prior to joining El Paso, he served as President of
AMVEST Corporation, a coal and gas producer and provider of
related products and services, and held executive positions at
AEI Resources, Inc., a coal producer, including President and
Chief Executive Officer. Before joining AEI Resources, he served
as the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cyprus
Australia Coal Company and held executive operating management
positions with Cyprus in the U.S. before being relocated to
Sydney, Australia in 1997. He worked for Pittston Coal Company,
a coal mining company, in various operating and executive
management positions from 1986 to 1995 including as Vice
President Operations prior to joining Cyprus Amax Coal Company,
a coal producer and supplier.
Executive
Compensation
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
In recent years, Cliffs has undergone a strategic transformation
to an international mining company from its historic business
model as a mine manager for the integrated steel industry in
North America. Through the acquisitions and joint venture
partnerships described above, the transformation has included
Cliffs pursuit of geographic and mineral diversification,
with a focus on providing raw materials to the steelmaking
industry. As part of this transformation, Cliffs has experienced
significant price increases driven by market factors and rapid
revenue growth, which factors have had a meaningful impact on
Cliffs executive compensation in recent years. With this
in mind, the Cliffs Compensation Committee, or
Compensation Committee, has continually sought to strike a
balance in program design and execution among several competing
objectives, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Attraction and retention of executive talent in highly
competitive executive labor markets;
|
|
|
|
Recognition for business performance;
|
|
|
|
Maintaining focus on controllable financial results;
|
|
|
|
Limiting the potential for undue windfalls or losses to
executives;
|
|
|
|
Recognition of changes in scope of the business (revenues and
profitability);
|
|
|
|
Supporting Cliffs strategic repositioning by:
|
Building capacity;
Growth and diversification of revenue
streams; and
Internationalization; and
|
|
|
|
|
Ensuring alignment with shareholder interests.
|
The specific compensation principles, components, and decisions
designed to achieve these objectives are discussed in more
detail below. This discussion focuses on the information
contained in the tables and related footnotes and narratives
included below primarily for Cliffs 2007 fiscal year, but
also contains information regarding compensation actions taken
and decisions made both before and after fiscal year 2007 to the
extent that information enhances the understanding of
Cliffs executive compensation program. Please note that,
unless indicated otherwise, all Cliffs common shares amounts and
share prices in this Executive Compensation section have been
adjusted retroactively to reflect the
two-for-one
stock split effective May 15, 2008.
Oversight
of Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee administers the Cliffs executive
compensation program, including compensation for Cliffs
Chief Executive Officer, Joseph A. Carrabba, its Chief Financial
Officer, Laurie Brlas, the other three highest paid employees on
December 31, 2007, William R. Calfee, Donald J. Gallagher
and Randy Kummer, and Messrs. David Gunning and Ronald
Stovash, former Vice Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer
and President of PinnOak, respectively, who would have been
among the three highest paid employees other than the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer but for their
termination of employment during 2007. Cliffs collectively
refers to these individuals as its named executive officers.
Effective October 3, 2008, however, Cliffs
182
and Mr. Kummer terminated their employment relationship, as
further discussed below. Specific responsibilities of the
Compensation Committee related to executive compensation include:
|
|
|
|
|
Oversee development and implementation of Cliffs
compensation policies and programs for executive officers;
|
|
|
|
Review and approve Chief Executive Officer and other elected
officer compensation, including setting goals, evaluating
performance, and determining results;
|
|
|
|
Oversee Cliffs equity-based employee incentive
compensation plans and approve grants (except grants or awards
under plans relating to Director compensation, which are
administered by the Cliffs Board Affairs Committee);
|
|
|
|
Ensure that the criteria for awards under Cliffs incentive
and equity plans are appropriately related to its operating
performance objectives;
|
|
|
|
Oversee certain aspects of regulatory compliance with respect to
compensation matters; and
|
|
|
|
Review and approve any proposed severance or retention plans or
agreements.
|
Executive
Compensation Philosophy and Core Principles
The Compensation Committee has designed the compensation
structure to attract, motivate, reward and retain
high-performing executives. The goal is to align pay with
Cliffs performance in the short term through measures of
profitability and operational excellence, and over the long term
through stock-based incentives. Cliffs compensation
philosophy places a significant portion of compensation at risk
with Cliffs performance and individual performance, increasing
the portion at risk with the responsibility level of the
individual, consistent with market practices. Cliffs also seeks
to balance this performance focus with sufficient retention
incentives and a focus on controllable results to limit the risk
of losing key executives during periods of unfavorable industry
conditions, all in a manner that the Compensation Committee
deems fair to the executives and to the shareholders.
More specifically, the guiding principles of Cliffs
compensation plan design and administration are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Target pay opportunity for executive officers should be at the
62.5th percentile of market levels.
|
|
|
|
Align pay with results delivered to shareholders, while
recognizing the potentially cyclical nature of the industry in
which Cliffs operates. The goal is to avoid undue windfalls to
executives in years of good performance or the undue loss of all
compensation opportunities in down cycles.
|
|
|
|
Focus performance measures on a combination of absolute
performance objectives tied to Cliffs business plan
(profitability and cost control), achievement of key initiatives
that reflect the business strategy (e.g., sales
initiatives, cost control activities, etc.) and relative
objectives reflecting market conditions (relative total
shareholder return (which reflects share price appreciation plus
reinvested dividends, if any)).
|
|
|
|
Provide competitive fixed compensation elements over the
short-term (salary) and long-term (retention grants and
retirement benefits) to encourage long-term retention of
Cliffs executives.
|
|
|
|
Design pay programs to be as simple and transparent as possible
to facilitate focus and understanding.
|
During 2007, and since the beginning of 2008, Cliffs
executive compensation and benefits consisted of salary, annual
cash incentives, long-term incentives consisting of performance
shares, retention units, restricted share units, restricted
shares, retirement benefits, and limited perquisites and other
benefits. The Compensation Committee regularly reviews and
re-evaluates target positioning for each element of
compensation. Descriptions of each of these elements are
discussed in more detail in the following sections.
Compensation
Policies
Market Positioning. During 2007, Cliffs
continued to manage total compensation (base plus target annual
incentives and the grant value of long-term incentives) to the
median of the market in which Cliffs competes for
183
talent. During 2008, the Compensation Committee approved
targeting total compensation at the 62.5th percentile. Cliffs
believes that a 62.5th percentile pay positioning will allow it
to remain competitive in attracting, retaining and motivating
the needed level of talent for the organization while managing
costs to an objectively reasonable level. Actual pay may be
higher or lower than this target positioning overall based on
company and individual performance. The target compensation for
each executive may also be higher or lower than this market
positioning based on such factors as individual skills,
experience, contribution and performance, internal equity, or
other factors that the Compensation Committee may take into
account that are relevant to the individual executive.
Market for Talent. The Compensation Committee
conducts an annual review of market pay practices for executive
officers with the assistance of Mercer (US), Inc., its outside
compensation advisor. This review is based on several published
compensation surveys. For 2007, the pay review targeted general
industry pay practices for companies with approximately
$2.5 billion in revenues, reflecting the increased scope of
Cliffs worldwide operations.
Pay Mix. Because Cliffs executive
officers are in a position to directly influence its overall
performance, a significant portion of their compensation is at
risk through short- and long-term incentive programs.
Cliffs named executive officers have a significant percent
of their target total compensation at risk. This includes the
target annual incentive and target long-term incentive grant
values, but not benefits or retirement programs. These levels of
pay at risk are consistent with each executives level of
impact and responsibility and are consistent with market
practices for fixed versus variable pay.
Forms of Compensation. Cliffs uses cash for
salaries and for annual incentive plan payouts, consistent with
market practices and the short-term nature of performance. For
longer-term performance, Cliffs currently uses performance
shares, retention units, restricted share units, and restricted
share grants to reward and retain executives. The retention
units are denominated in Cliffs common shares and vary
with its share price, but are payable in cash. The performance
shares, restricted share unit and restricted share grants are
denominated and payable in Cliffs common shares to align
the interests of its executives with shareholders through direct
ownership.
Each year, Cliffs establishes a target long-term incentive award
value for each executive based on market practices. Actual
awards to each executive may vary +/- 25 percent from this
target based on the Chief Executive Officers assessment of
individual performance in the case of executives other than the
Chief Executive Officer, and based on the Compensation
Committees assessment of the Chief Executive
Officers performance in the case of grants made to the
Chief Executive Officer. In 2007, the Compensation Committee
awarded 15 percent of the long-term incentive opportunity
for each Cliffs named executive officer other than
Mr. Stovash in the form of retention units. Each retention
unit represents the value of one Cliffs common share, which is
payable in cash based on the participants continued
employment throughout a three-year retention period. Retention
units are guaranteed a payout at 100 percent of the
original grant. The balance of each individuals long-term
incentive award was in the form of performance shares, with
actual payouts tied to Cliffs total shareholder return
relative to industry peers over a three-year performance period
(see below for further detail).
In 2008, the Compensation Committee awarded 25 percent of
the long-term incentive opportunity for each Cliffs named
executive officer in the form of restricted share units. Each
such restricted share unit represents one of Cliffs common
shares. The restricted share units are payable in shares based
on the participants continued employment throughout the
three-year period ending December 31, 2010. The balance of
each named executive officers long-term incentive award
for 2008 was in the form of performance shares as described
above.
Restricted share awards were granted on a selective basis to
executives at the PinnOak mines in relation to the 2007
acquisition of PinnOak in order to retain their critical
expertise in underground coal operations. The restrictions on
the shares will lapse 50 percent two years after grant date
and 50 percent three years after grant date or will lapse
immediately in the event the executive is involuntarily
terminated without cause as defined in the restricted share
agreements. No other named executive officers received a
restricted share grant in 2007 or 2008.
Other Factors. When making individual
compensation decisions for executives, Cliffs takes many factors
into account, including the individuals performance,
tenure and experience, Cliffs performance overall, any
retention concerns, the individuals historical
compensation and internal equity considerations.
184
The Compensation Committee relies significantly on the Chief
Executive Officers input and recommendations when
evaluating these factors relative to the executive officers
other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation
Committee also reviews a five-year pay history for each
executive and considers the progression of salary increases over
time compared to the individuals development and
performance, the unvested and vested value inherent in
outstanding equity awards, and the cumulative impact of all
previous compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee uses
the same factors in evaluating the Chief Executive
Officers performance and compensation as it uses with the
other executive officers.
Committee Process. Decisions relating to the
Chief Executive Officers pay are made by the Compensation
Committee in executive session, without management present. In
assessing the Chief Executive Officers pay, the
Compensation Committee considers company performance, the Chief
Executive Officers contribution to that performance, and
other factors as described above in the same manner as for any
other executive. The Compensation Committee approves the Chief
Executive Officers salary, incentive plan payment
(consistent with the terms of the plan as described below) and
long-term incentive awards each year.
For the other named executive officers, the Chief Executive
Officer in partnership with Human Resources conducts an
assessment of each executive at the end of each year against a
spectrum of behaviors and strategic goals established for each
executive at the beginning of the year. The Chief Executive
Officer then provides the Compensation Committee with his
assessment of the performance of the executive and his
perspective on the factors described above in developing his
recommendations for each executives compensation,
including salary adjustments, annual incentive payouts, and
equity grants. The Compensation Committee discusses the Chief
Executive Officers recommendations, including how the
recommendations compare against the external market data and how
the compensation levels of the executives compare to each other,
to the Chief Executive Officers, and to the historic pay
for each executive. Based on this discussion, the Compensation
Committee then approves or modifies the recommendations in
collaboration with the Chief Executive Officer.
Elements
of Compensation
Cliffs uses multiple components to provide a competitive overall
compensation and benefits package that is reasonable relative to
market and industry practices and tied appropriately to
performance.
Base Salary. Cliffs philosophy is that
base salaries should meet the objective of attracting and
retaining the executive talent needed to run the business.
Therefore, Cliffs seeks to target base pay levels for executives
at the 50th percentile of market survey data, although each
executive may have a base salary above or below the median of
the market. Actual salaries reflect responsibility, performance,
and experience, among other factors described above.
Base salary adjustments can affect the value of other
compensation and benefit elements. A higher base salary will
result in a higher annual incentive, assuming the same level of
achievement against goals. Base salaries also affect the level
of performance-based contributions to the Cleveland-Cliffs Inc
and its Associated Employers Salaried Employees Supplemental
Retirement Savings Plan, a tax-qualified 401(k) savings plan,
which Cliffs refers to as its 401(k) Savings Plan, disability
benefits, severance and change in control benefits and pension
benefits.
For 2007, the Compensation Committee recognized Cliffs
substantially increased size in terms of revenues, the increased
complexity of the organization on a global basis, and the
overall increase in Cliffs ability to pay for top talent
due to the heightened level of profitability relative to prior
years. The market benchmarks used by the Compensation Committee
reflected these factors and as a result showed that executives
were currently positioned approximate to the competitive market
median. As such, no significant adjustments outside of merit
increases were made to named executive officers base
salaries in 2007 or 2008.
Annual Incentive Plan. Cliffs provides an
annual Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan, which
provides an opportunity for the senior executive officers to
earn an annual cash incentive based on company financial
performance relative to business plans and achievement against
key corporate objectives. The objective of this plan is to
provide executives with a competitive annual cash compensation
opportunity while aligning actual pay results with Cliffs
short-term business performance.
185
2007 Award Opportunities: Under the
Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan, bonus
opportunities for senior officers, including the named executive
officers, ranged from zero to a maximum of 100 percent of
the officers grant amount for 2007. The maximum annual
incentive opportunity for the Chief Executive Officer was
200 percent of base salary in 2007 and for each of the
other named executive officers, including the former Vice
Chairman, Mr. Gunning, the target incentive ranged from 105
to 126 percent of base salary. Mr. Stovash was not a
participant in the Executive Management Performance Incentive
Plan and was covered by a different annual incentive program
sponsored by PinnOak, under which his target incentive was 80%
of base salary and his potential bonus ranged from
0 percent at threshold to 140 percent of target at
maximum.
2007 Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan
Performance Measures: The Executive
Management Performance Incentive Plan uses a performance
scorecard with multiple performance standards that are
related to Cliffs annual business plan and current
strategic priorities. For 2007, the Compensation Committee
developed a scorecard targeted at those areas that it believed
would most directly improve financial results for shareholders
in the near term, while maintaining incentives for long-term
strategic improvements. The elements and their respective
weightings for 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Objective
|
|
Weight
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Earnings
|
|
|
50.00
|
%
|
Adjusted Cost Control
|
|
|
25.00
|
%
|
Corporate Objectives
|
|
|
25.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax earnings is a measure of Cliffs profitability and
is measured on a consolidated basis. Adjusted cost control is a
measure of the cost of production per ton, adjusted to hold
energy prices at a fixed rate throughout the year in order to
eliminate the (positive and negative) impact of the large and
potentially volatile uncontrollable cost of energy on
compensation. Although cost control is a component of pre-tax
earnings, the Compensation Committee believes a more targeted
focus on managing production cost per ton is essential to
Cliffs long-term health. Adjusted cost control is measured
only for North American iron ore operations, based on the
Compensation Committees belief that cost control in this
region was most critical to Cliffs success during 2007.
Similarly, the Compensation Committee evaluates management on a
subjective basis against key strategic and operational goals
that are not as easily quantified as financial results to ensure
that short-term profitability is balanced with the long-term
success of the organization. For 2007, corporate objectives
included goals in the areas of business development, workforce,
safety, specific cost initiatives and sales initiatives.
2007 Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan
Target Setting and 2007 Results: Performance
targets for the financial objectives of the Executive Management
Performance Incentive Plan are established at the beginning of
each year. Each metric has a threshold, target, and maximum
goal, with a potential funding of between 0 percent and
100 percent of the maximum award. At threshold performance,
each goal would be funded at 25 percent of maximum, with
0 percent funding for performance below threshold. If
performance is at the target level, the bonus will be funded at
50 percent of the maximum award. Adjustments to 2007
pre-tax earnings were made as a result of the reversal of
certain ore stockpile sales that occurred in December 2006. As a
result of these adjustments, revenue recognition on these
transactions totaling $94 million was deferred until 2007.
The Compensation Committee adjusted the 2007 Executive
Management Performance Incentive Plan targets to take into
account these adjustments and their impact on 2007 pre-tax
earnings to ensure that management did not receive a windfall in
2007 under the Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan.
Each year, the Compensation Committee approves performance
targets and ranges for each of the financial performance
measures, taking into consideration management financial plans
for the coming year, prior years performance, performance
relative to other metals and mining companies, and the relative
degree of difficulty of attaining performance goals under
different product-pricing scenarios. Performance targets are
approved each year by the Compensation Committee early in the
year, with an adjustment as necessary for the specific impact of
world pellet price settlements on price escalators in
Cliffs contracts. This price adjustment is formulaic and
objective, tied directly to Cliffs term supply agreements.
186
For 2007, the Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan
was funded at 76.82 percent of the maximum bonuses for all
named executive officers except Mr. Carrabba.
Mr. Carrabbas Executive Management Performance
Incentive Plan bonus was funded at 72.98 percent. The
Compensation Committee arrived at this funding level by taking
the following factors into consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
2007 pre-tax earnings were reviewed and compared to adjusted
maximum performance levels set at the beginning of 2007 of
$422 million with an adjusted minimum and target
performance levels of $281 million and $351 million.
Preliminary results were $380.7 million. This factor was
weighted 50 percent, resulting in funding of
35.44 percent of maximum bonuses.
|
|
|
|
Adjusted cost control was above the target established for the
year, resulting in a funding multiple of 16.38 percent of
maximum for this performance factor (weighted 25 percent).
|
|
|
|
The Compensation Committee evaluated corporate objectives
established at the beginning of the year and rated those
objectives at a performance level of 100 percent. This
factor was weighted 25 percent, resulting in funding of
25 percent of maximum bonuses. Due to post acquisition
performance of PinnOak and at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee, Mr. Carrabbas corporate objectives portion
of the bonus was rated less than other named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
Bonuses for 2007 under the Executive Management Performance
Incentive Plan were paid in the following amounts to the named
executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph A Carrabba
|
|
$
|
1,021,706
|
|
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
$
|
337,240
|
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
$
|
367,200
|
|
|
|
Randy L. Kummer
|
|
|
$
|
212,023
|
|
Donald G. Gallagher
|
|
$
|
381,027
|
|
|
|
David G. Gunning
|
|
|
$
|
182,448
|
|
The specific performance goals for adjusted cost control are not
disclosed as Cliffs believes, and the Compensation Committee
concurs, that providing detailed information about Cliffs
cost structure could limit its ability to negotiate supply
agreements or spot sales on terms that would be favorable to its
shareholders, thereby resulting in meaningful competitive harm.
Likewise, Cliffs and the Compensation Committee believe that
disclosing specific, non-quantitative corporate objectives for
the year would provide detailed information on business
operations and forward looking strategic plans to its customers
and competitors that could result in substantial competitive
harm.
The Compensation Committee did test the adjusted cost control
performance targets by comparing to business plans, past
performance, and the impact of cost per ton on the range of
pre-tax earnings goals, including the impact under different
product-pricing scenarios. Based on these evaluations, the
Compensation Committee believes that the range of performance
objectives established for 2007 were appropriately difficult to
attain. Corporate objectives are subjective in nature and
therefore the degree of difficulty cannot be readily quantified.
2008 Award Opportunities and 2008 Executive Management
Performance Incentive Plan Performance
Measures: 2008 bonus opportunities for senior
officers, including the named executive officers, under the
Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan again range from
zero to a maximum of 100 percent of the officers
maximum bonus opportunities for 2008. The maximum annual
incentive opportunity for the Chief Executive Officer is
280 percent of base salary, and for each of the other named
executive officers the target incentive ranges from 147 to
168 percent of base salary. The target annual bonus
opportunity for named executive officers is 50 percent of
the maximum bonus opportunity and the threshold annual bonus
opportunity for named executive officers is 25 percent of
the maximum bonus opportunity. For 2008, the Executive
Management Performance Incentive Plan again uses a
performance scorecard with multiple performance
standards that are related to Cliffs annual business plan
and current strategic priorities. For 2008, the Compensation
Committee developed a scorecard targeted at those areas that it
believed would most directly improve financial results for
shareholders in the near term, while maintaining incentives for
long-term strategic improvements. The elements and their
respective weightings for 2008 are the same as those for the
Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan for 2007.
2008 Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan
Target Setting: The specific performance
targets for 2008 for pre-tax earnings and adjusted cost controls
are not disclosed as Cliffs believes, and the Compensation
187
Committee concurs, that providing detailed information about
Cliffs cost structure prior to the completion of the 2008
performance period could result in meaningful competitive harm.
Long-Term Incentives. The objectives of
Cliffs long-term incentives are to reward executives for
sustained performance over multiple years while recognizing the
potential volatility of industry conditions and limiting the
potential for undue windfalls or losses to executives for
factors outside of managements control. In addition,
Cliffs long-term incentive programs are designed to
enhance retention of executives by delaying the vesting of
compensation opportunities and to align the long-term interests
of executives with shareholders through the use of equity to
deliver compensation.
Administrative Process: Long-term
incentive awards for senior executives are generally made
annually and are based on the executives position,
experience, performance, prior equity-based compensation awards
and competitive equity-based compensation levels. The grant date
is the date of the Compensation Committee approval or a later
date as set by the Compensation Committee. Grants for new hires
or promotions are approved by the Compensation Committee at the
next regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting
following the hire or promotion date or in a special meeting, as
needed. The grant date for new hire or promotional grants is the
date of such approval or such later date as the Compensation
Committee determines. Cliffs does not time grants to coordinate
with the release of material non-public information.
The review of market practices in 2007 indicated that Cliffs was
approximate to the desired market pay positioning for total
compensation, including long-term incentives, for named
executive officers. As a result, the Compensation Committee
maintained its grant guidelines for 2007.
Performance Share Program: Performance
shares continue to be the primary vehicle used by Cliffs to
deliver long-term incentives. A performance share is the
opportunity to earn a common share based on Cliffs
performance over a three-year period, with potential funding
between 0 percent and 150 percent of the target share
grant depending on the level of performance against goals.
Cliffs uses performance shares to reward for shareholder results
relative to industry conditions, taking into consideration
returns to shareholders as compared to other companies in the
steel and mining industries.
Specifically, each executive officer is granted a target number
of performance shares at the beginning of each three-year
period. The total shareholder return for Cliffs and its
performance peers identified below was historically measured
quarterly on a cumulative basis since the beginning of the
performance period and Cliffs was ranked relative to peers at
the end of each quarter. At the end of three years, Cliffs
calculated the average of these quarterly percentile rankings of
total shareholder return performance relative to peers to
determine the total performance over the three-year period and
the number of shares earned at the end of the period. Funding
for performance below threshold is zero percent. An absolute
threshold is also provided for Return on Net Assets performance.
If average Return on Net Assets is below 12 percent over
the three years of the plan, then any payouts will be reduced by
50 percent regardless of relative total shareholder return.
Return on Net Assets is defined as pre-tax income divided by
average assets less average current liabilities, excluding
short-term debt included in current liabilities, for each year
of the plan. The calibration of the pay for performance
relationship is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Level
|
Performance Factor
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Relative total
|
|
35th%ile
|
|
55th%ile
|
|
75th%ile
|
shareholder return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
50%
|
|
100%
|
|
150%
|
Pre-Tax Return on Net Assets
|
|
Calculated payout reduced 50% if Return on Net Assets is below
12% at the end of the three year period (approximately
equivalent to the cost of capital on a pre-tax basis)
|
On March 12, 2007, the Compensation Committee adopted a new
methodology for the calculation of payment of performance shares
in connection with the 2007 Incentive Equity Plan. With respect
to performance shares, a portion of the calculation was based on
a cumulative
quarter-by-quarter
basis calculation of total shareholder return. Under the 2007
Incentive Equity Plan, the
quarter-by-quarter
portion of the calculation was eliminated, and the
188
calculation is instead based on cumulative total shareholder
return between the start and the end of the performance period.
The Compensation Committee also gave participants in the prior
plan the option of having the old or new methodology apply to
their outstanding performance shares for the
2005-2007
and
2006-2008
performance periods. Ms. Brlas and Messrs. Carrabba
and Gunning elected to apply the new methodology to their
outstanding grants, and Messrs. Calfee, Gallagher and
Kummer elected to continue to have the old methodology apply to
their outstanding grants. While the total impact of this change
cannot be calculated at this time given the
2006-2008
performance period has not been completed, the new methodology
resulted in a higher total shareholder return performance factor
for
2005-2007
performance shares. Subsequently, on May 12, 2008, the
Compensation Committee determined that the election process was
inconsistent with its pay for performance philosophy
and determined to automatically pay the executives the amount
generated by the new methodology if it is higher than the old
methodology for the
2006-2008
performance period.
The performance peer group used for the relative performance
share plan during the
2007-2009
cycle is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
AK Steel Holding Corp.
|
|
Gerdau Ameristeel Corp.
|
|
Rio Tinto plc
|
Algoma Steel Inc.
|
|
IPSCO Inc.
|
|
Southern Copper Corp.
|
Arch Coal
|
|
Macarthur Coal
|
|
Steel Dynamics Inc.
|
Companhia Vale ADR
|
|
Nucor Corp.
|
|
Teck Cominco Ltd
|
Freeport-McMoran
|
|
Oxiana Limited
|
|
USX-US Steel Group
|
The peer group currently focuses on steel, metals and commodity
mineral mining companies that will be generally affected by the
same long-term market conditions as those that affect Cliffs.
The Compensation Committee evaluates this peer group for each
new cycle of the performance share plan and makes adjustments as
needed based on changes in the industry makeup and relevance of
Cliffs specific peers. During a cycle, any peer that is
acquired, files for bankruptcy, or otherwise ceases to trade on
a major stock exchange will be excluded from the calculation of
relative performance for each quarter subsequent to the
de-listing event. Beginning with the
2007-2009
grant, the Compensation Committee determined that the S&P
Metals and Mining ETF total shareholder return would be
substituted for the entire performance period for any peer that
is acquired, files for bankruptcy, or otherwise ceases to trade
on a major stock exchange. To date, the following companies have
been excluded from the performance peer group: Algoma and IPSCO
Inc. On May 12, 2008, the Compensation Committee also
determined to amend the 2006 grant so that the participants
would get the greater of the payout determined if the S&P
Metals and Mining ETF is substituted in place of peer group
companies that drop out of the peer group and the payout
determined if no such substitution is permitted.
In January 2008, the Compensation Committee determined that, for
the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2007,
Cliffs achieved the 75th percentile with respect to its
peer group for total shareholder return, a Return on Net Assets
greater than 12 percent, and 100 percent with respect
to the accomplishment of strategic objectives. This provided a
total performance factor of 175 percent for the
2005-2007
performance periods. However, based on the application of the
maximum value cap in place for grants before 2006, the actual
payout was reduced to 77 percent of the uncapped value. A
payout for such performance period was made in Cliffs common
shares to all participants, including Messrs. Carrabba,
Calfee, Gallagher, Kummer and Gunning, with a distribution date
of February 27, 2008. The performance share award for the
named executive officers for the
2005-2007
performance period is disclosed under the 2007 Option
Exercises and Stock Vested Table in footnotes 4 and 5.
Retention Units: Starting in 2000, the
Compensation Committee began granting a part of its incentive
equity grants as retention units. The retention awards included
in the Cleveland-Cliffs Inc Long-Term Incentive Plan and the
2007 Incentive Equity Plan assist Cliffs in retaining key
executives throughout industry cycles by providing a minimum
floor to the long-term incentive opportunity based solely on
executives remaining with the company. In 2007, the Compensation
Committee awarded executive officers 15 percent of their
long-term incentive opportunity in the form of retention units.
Each retention unit represents the value of one Cliffs common
share and is payable in cash based upon the participants
continued employment throughout the three-year retention period.
During 2007, the retention units granted on March 8, 2005
to the named executive officers employed on that date vested on
December 31, 2007 and were paid out in cash on
February 27, 2008, as shown in footnote 5 under the
189
2007 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table.
Cliffs closing share price on December 31, 2007 of
$50.40 per share was used to determine the value of this payout.
2008-2010 Performance Share and Restricted Share Unit
Awards: On March 10, 2008, the
Compensation Committee approved performance share and restricted
share unit awards under the 2007 Incentive Equity Plan for
Cliffs executives, including its named executive officers.
75 percent of the total value of the incentive award was
made in the form of performance shares, while the remaining
25 percent was made in the form of restricted share units.
Restricted share units are earned based on continued employment,
are retention-based awards, vest at the end of the performance
period used for the performance shares, and are payable in
common shares at a time determined by the Compensation Committee
in its discretion. The following amounts of performance shares
and restricted share units were awarded to Cliffs named
executive officers for the
2008-2010
performance period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Name
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share Units
|
|
|
Joseph A Carrabba
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
|
10,800
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
Donald G. Gallagher
|
|
|
10,650
|
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
8,100
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
Randy L. Kummer
|
|
|
6,150
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
The performance shares awards for the
2008-2010
performance period under the 2007 Incentive Equity Plan are
subject to relative total shareholder return and three-year
cumulative free cash flow performance metrics, and are intended
to be paid out in common shares. Free cash flow is defined as
cash from operations less capital expenditures. Further, the
Compensation Committee resolved that, upon the occurrence of a
change in control, all performance shares and restricted share
units awarded for the
2008-2010
performance period will vest and become nonforfeitable, and will
be paid out in cash. The specific performance targets for the
cumulative free cash flow performance metrics are not disclosed
as Cliffs believes, and the Compensation Committee concurs, that
providing detailed information about Cliffs expectations
prior to the completion of the
2008-2010
performance period could result in meaningful competitive harm.
Restricted Share Grants: During 2007,
the Compensation Committee did not award any restricted share
awards to any of the current named executive officers.
Restricted shares awarded to three named executive officers in
2005 vested on December 31, 2007. Mr. Stovash received
a grant of 38,000 shares of restricted shares pursuant to
the closing of the acquisition of PinnOak. His restricted shares
were originally intended to vest 50 percent two years after
date of grant and the remaining three years after date of grant.
However, under the circumstances of his termination,
Mr. Stovashs shares vested in November 2007.
Retirement
and Deferred Compensation Benefits
Defined Benefit Pension Plan: Cliffs
maintains a defined benefit pension plan, which it refers to as
the Pension Plan, and a Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan in
which all of the named executive officers, except
Mr. Stovash, are eligible for participation following one
year of service. The Compensation Committee believes that
pension benefits are a typical component of total remuneration
for employees and executives in industries similar to
Cliffs industry, and that providing such benefits is
important to delivering a competitive package to retain
employees. The objective of the Supplemental Retirement Benefit
Plan is to provide benefits above the statutory limits for
qualified pension plans for highly paid executives.
401(k) Savings Plan: Under Cliffs
401(k) Savings Plan, executives are eligible to contribute up to
35 percent of base salary. Pre-tax contributions are
limited by the annual Internal Revenue Service discrimination
testing limits. For the calendar year 2007, employee pre-tax
contributions are limited to $15,500. Cliffs matches
100 percent of employee contributions up to the first
3 percent and 50 percent for the next 2 percent.
Additionally, Cliffs has a performance-based contribution that
can be made annually to the 401(k) Savings Plan. The
performance-based contribution was established to deliver as
much as 10 percent of eligible 401(k) wages into the 401(k)
Savings Plan when Cliffs meets certain financial performance
targets.
190
Deferred Compensation Plan: Under the
Voluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, or VNQDC
Plan, the named executive officers and other senior management
employees are permitted to defer, on a pre-tax basis, up to
50 percent of their base salary, all or a portion of their
annual incentive under the Executive Management Performance
Incentive Plan and their share award or cash award that may be
payable under the Long-Term Incentive Plan or the 2007 Incentive
Equity Plan. The Compensation Committee believes the opportunity
to defer compensation is a competitive benefit and addresses the
goal of attracting and retaining talent.
Cash awards can be deferred into a cash deferral account or a
share unit account. Share awards can only be deferred into share
units. Cash deferrals earn interest at the Moodys
Corporate Average Bond Yield rate. Unit deferrals are
denominated in Cliffs common shares and vary with
Cliffs share price performance.
In order to encourage share ownership and the alignment of
executive interests with shareholder interests, as well as to
assist executives in meeting their share ownership guidelines
(as discussed below under Share Ownership
Guidelines), any cash compensation awards deferred into
share units are matched with a 25 percent match by Cliffs
that vests at the end of five years.
Finally, the VNQDC Plan provides that if a participant is
entitled to receive a performance-based contribution under the
401(k) Savings Plan but is limited in the amounts that can be
contributed to the 401(k) Savings Plan by certain Code
limitations, then any such performance-based contributions in
excess of the Code limits are deferred into the VNQDC Plan.
These specific cash accounts are not convertible to share units.
Other Benefits. Cliffs other benefits
and perquisites for senior executives include company paid
parking, personal financial services and company paid club
memberships. These benefits are disclosed below in the
2007 Summary Compensation Table under All
Other Compensation and described in footnote 5.
Supplementary
Compensation Policies
Cliffs uses several additional policies to ensure that the
overall compensation structure is aligned with shareholder
interests and is competitive with market practices. Specific
policies include:
Share Ownership Guidelines: The Board of
Directors adopted share ownership guidelines to ensure that
senior executives have a meaningful direct ownership stake in
Cliffs and that the interests of executives are thereby aligned
with shareholders. The guidelines call for the Chief Executive
Officer to own shares equal in value to
four-and-a-half
times annual base salary. Other executives, depending on their
level, are required to hold between
one-and-a-half
and
two-and-a-half
times annual base salary in shares. For awards made after
January 1, 2007 under the 2007 Incentive Equity Plan,
executives are not permitted to sell shares received under the
Performance Share Program unless the executive is in compliance
with the ownership guidelines, except as may be necessary to pay
income taxes. An officers direct ownership of shares,
including restricted shares and share units held in the VNQDC
Plan, count toward meeting the share ownership guidelines.
Severance and Change in Control
Agreements: Cliffs has entered into severance
agreements with all of the named executive officers that provide
for certain payments upon termination following a change in
control. The Compensation Committee believes that such
agreements support the goals of attracting and retaining highly
talented individuals by clarifying the terms of employment and
reducing the risks to the executive in situations where the
executive believes that Cliffs may undergo a merger or be
acquired. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that
such agreements align the interests of executives with the
interests of shareholders if a qualified offer to acquire Cliffs
is made, in that each of the named executive officers would
likely be aware of or involved in any such negotiation and it is
to the benefit of shareholders to have the executives
negotiating in the shareholders best interests without
regard to the executive officers personal financial
interests.
The agreements generally provide for the following
change-in-control
provisions (see accompanying narrative below for more details):
|
|
|
|
|
Automatic vesting of unvested equity incentives upon
change-in-control;
|
|
|
|
Two to three times annual base salary and target annual
incentive as severance upon termination following a change in
control, and continuation of welfare benefits between two to
three years;
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
Full tax
gross-up
payments on any excise taxes imposed upon any change in control
payments; and
|
|
|
|
Non-compete, confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions for
executives who receive severance payments following a change in
control.
|
Separation Agreement: Effective
October 3, 2008, Cliffs and Mr. Kummer terminated
their employment relationship. In connection with this
termination of the employment relationship, Cliffs and
Mr. Kummer entered into a Separation Agreement and Release
of Claims, or separation agreement. Under the separation
agreement, Mr. Kummer will receive the following severance
benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
a lump sum payment of $548,000, which is equal to two times
Mr. Kummers base pay;
|
|
|
|
a lump sum payment of $160,000, which approximates
Mr. Kummers expected payout under the Executive
Management Performance Incentive Plan, pro-rated for service
during 2008;
|
|
|
|
payouts for performance shares, retention unit and restricted
share unit grants received by Mr. Kummer under Cliffs
long-term incentive programs will be pro-rated based upon the
length of Mr. Kummers employment during the
applicable incentive periods;
|
|
|
|
restricted shares granted to Mr. Kummer in 2006 under the
1992 Incentive Equity Plan became non-forfeitable on
October 3, 2008 as if Mr. Kummer had been
involuntarily terminated without cause and will be paid in
accordance with the terms of Mr. Kummers 2006
restricted share award agreement;
|
|
|
|
Mr. Kummer and his eligible dependants will be entitled to
continuation of health insurance coverage for up to
24 months under certain circumstances; and
|
|
|
|
Mr. Kummer will be entitled to relocation assistance for up
to 12 months, to the extent such benefits are not available
through another employer, and outplacement assistance for up to
12 months.
|
The separation agreement also provides that Mr. Kummer may
retain his company-provided laptop computer and contains
customary provisions regarding confidentiality of Cliffs
proprietary information and a two-year non-solicitation
covenant. The separation agreement also contains a general
release of claims against Cliffs and a covenant not to sue
Cliffs.
Other Material Tax and Accounting
Implications: Section 162(m) of the Code
limits the deductibility of certain executive compensation in
excess of $1 million. The aggregate combination of
distributions from the Executive Management Performance
Incentive Plan, Long-Term Incentive Plan, vesting of restricted
shares, and dividends on restricted shares has caused, with
respect to 2007, the $1 million limit to be exceeded with
respect to five of the named executive officers, and will cause
the $1 million limit to be exceeded in subsequent years
with respect to one or more of the named executive officers. In
2007, Cliffs shareholders approved the Executive
Management Performance Incentive Plan, and the 2007 Incentive
Equity Plan, which replaced the predecessor plans. Performance
based compensation under the Executive Management Performance
Incentive Plan and the 2007. Incentive Equity Plan will be
exempt from the $1 million limit. Even with the adoption of
these new plans, retention units and restricted share grants
will still not qualify as performance based compensation and
thus will be excluded from the calculation of the
$1 million limit.
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by the
named executive officers for services rendered to Cliffs and its
subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007
and 2006. This table discloses in column (c) the salary of
each named executive officer. Salary under column
(c) includes base salary before salary reduction
contributions to Cliffs Benefits Choice Plan, which
provides health, life and disability benefits, salary reduction
contributions to the Savings Plan and salary reduction
contributions to the VNQDC Plan. The VNQDC Plan is described
more fully in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section above.
Column (d) of the table, Bonus, discloses
special, non-incentive payments to certain executives, whether
such payments were designated bonus or not. Such payments
include payments in 2006 to Mr. Calfee in cash of
50 percent of the award he would otherwise have received as
restricted shares under the 1992 Incentive Equity Plan. Since
the restricted share agreements do not forfeit the restricted
shares of employees who retire, Mr. Calfee, who is
192
retirement eligible, was taxed on the value of the restricted
shares on the date of grant. The payment of 50 percent of
his award in cash was intended to assist him in paying the taxes
on the restricted shares award. Column (d) also includes a
special signing bonus and guaranteed bonus payable to
Ms. Brlas who was employed as Cliffs Chief Financial
Officer on December 11, 2006. Amounts payable to the named
executive officers under the Executive Management Performance
Incentive Plan are not shown in column (d), but are instead
shown under column (f), Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation.
Column (e) of the table, Stock Awards, reflects
the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting
purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 in accordance with SFAS 123R of
performance shares held by the named executive officers.
Performance shares vest and become payable at the end of a
three-year performance period. The performance share grants are
described more fully in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section above.
Column (e) of the table, Stock Awards, also
reflects an amount under SFAS 123R relating to retention
units granted to the named executive officers under the
Long-Term Incentive Plan or 2007 Incentive Equity Plan. The
retention units are measured by the value of Cliffs common
shares but are payable in cash rather than common shares. Such
retention units vest and become payable at the end of the third
year in the three-year period that includes the date of grant.
The retention units are described more fully in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section above.
In addition, column (e) of the table, Stock
Awards, reflects the amount under SFAS 123R relating
to restricted shares held by the named executive officers under
the 1992 Incentive Equity Plan. The restricted shares normally
vest and the restrictions lapse at the end of the third year in
the three-year period that includes the date of grant. The
restricted share awards are described more fully in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section above.
As noted above, column (f), Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation, includes amounts payable to the named
executive officers under the Executive Management Performance
Incentive Plan. The Executive Management Performance Incentive
Plan is described more fully in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section above. Column (f) also includes the amount of
performance based contribution credited to the accounts of the
named executive officers under the 401(k) Savings Plan and the
VNQDC Plan for 2007 and 2006. Such performance based
contribution is made on behalf of all salaried employees and is
equal to 10 percent of 401(k) eligible wages for all
salaried employees for 2007 and 2006. To the extent that such
contribution caused the total contributions to the 401(k)
Savings Plan to exceed certain Code limitations, the balance of
the contribution was credited to the accounts of the named
executive officers under the VNQDC Plan.
Column (g) of the table, Change in Pension Value and
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings, includes
accruals under the Pension Plan and the Supplemental Retirement
Benefit Plan. The Pension Plan and Supplemental Retirement
Benefit Plan are described more fully in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section above and before the Pension Benefits tables below.
193
Column (h) of the table, All Other
Compensation, shows the combined value of the named
executive officers perquisites. These perquisites include
payments by Cliffs for parking, financial services and club
memberships. Column (h) also includes matching
contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan and the VNQDC Plan.
Other benefits are described more fully in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section above and before the Pension Benefits tables below.
2007
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Compen-
|
|
Deferred
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
sation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Earnings ($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)(1)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)(1)(2)
|
|
(f)(1)(3)
|
|
(g)(4)
|
|
(h)(5)
|
|
(i)
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,105,673
|
|
|
|
1,089,206
|
|
|
|
159,936
|
|
|
|
63,280
|
|
|
|
4,093,094
|
|
Chairman, President and
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
520,833
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
909,353
|
|
|
|
752,083
|
|
|
|
125,300
|
|
|
|
106,382
|
|
|
|
2,413,951
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
376,250
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482,586
|
|
|
|
404,825
|
|
|
|
32,225
|
|
|
|
29,361
|
|
|
|
1,325,247
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
22,228
|
(6)
|
|
|
399,700
|
(7)
|
|
|
27,383
|
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
452,034
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald J. Gallagher
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
389,250
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955,825
|
|
|
|
419,952
|
|
|
|
513,938
|
|
|
|
109,309
|
|
|
|
2,388,274
|
|
President North American
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
339,583
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602,877
|
|
|
|
349,167
|
|
|
|
618,900
|
|
|
|
31,594
|
|
|
|
1,942,121
|
|
Iron Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
344,750
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687,210
|
|
|
|
371,715
|
|
|
|
512,590
|
|
|
|
70,168
|
|
|
|
1,986,433
|
|
Executive Vice
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
331,750
|
(6)
|
|
|
375,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
1,107,084
|
|
|
|
318,175
|
|
|
|
528,700
|
|
|
|
46,513
|
|
|
|
2,707,222
|
|
President-Commercial North American Iron Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy L. Kummer(9)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
259,750
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
754,437
|
|
|
|
237,998
|
|
|
|
49,047
|
|
|
|
28,607
|
|
|
|
1,329,840
|
|
Former Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
244,750
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791,053
|
|
|
|
199,475
|
|
|
|
34,900
|
|
|
|
18,150
|
|
|
|
1,288,328
|
|
Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald G. Stovash(9)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
348,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,316,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,129,521
|
|
|
|
2,794,369
|
|
Former Chief Executive Officer and President, PinnOak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David H. Gunning
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
184,083
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
715,847
|
|
|
|
200,856
|
|
|
|
193,571
|
(10)
|
|
|
56,294
|
(11)
|
|
|
1,350,651
|
|
Former Vice Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
426,250
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564,430
|
|
|
|
397,625
|
|
|
|
313,800
|
|
|
|
20,522
|
|
|
|
2,722,627
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Columns (c), (e) and (f) reflect the salary, equity
compensation and non-equity incentive compensation,
respectively, of each named executive officer before pre-tax
reductions for contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan and/or
the VNQDC Plan. Amounts by which salary, equity compensation and
non-equity incentive compensation were reduced in 2007 pursuant
to the named executive officers elections to make
contributions to the VNQDC Plan are as follows:
Carrabba $33,750; Brlas $26,337; and
Calfee $34,475. These amounts appear in column
(b) of the 2007 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Table below. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts in column (e) reflect the dollar amount
recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, or SFAS 123R, of awards of
restricted shares, performance shares and retention units, and
thus includes amounts from awards granted in and prior to 2006
and 2007. For additional information, refer to Note 11 to
Cliffs audited financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2007 included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and Notes 11 and 12 to Cliffs
audited financial statements in Item 8 of Cliffs
Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. These types of awards are discussed in further
detail in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section above under the headings
Performance Share Program,
Retention Units and
Restricted Stock Grants. See the
2007 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for more
detail on the awards of restricted shares, retention units and
performance shares. Please note that the amounts shown in column
(e) for 2006 differ from the amounts shown in column
(e) of the 2006 Summary Compensation Table included in
Cliffs proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting because
the |
194
|
|
|
|
|
amounts shown last year were the value of such awards on the
dates granted in 2006 rather than the amounts recognized for
financial statement reporting purposes. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts in column (f) reflect the sum of
(i) incentive bonus awards that were earned in 2007 under
the Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan, which is
discussed in further detail in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section above under the heading Annual
Incentive Plan, and were paid in cash to the named
executive officers on February 22, 2008, and
(ii) amounts allocated to the named executive officers as
performance-based contributions under the 401(k) Savings Plan,
which equaled in 2007 for all the participants under the 401(k)
Savings Plan 10 percent of their 401(k) eligible wages. To
the extent that such performance-based contributions exceeded
Code limits for a qualified profit sharing plan, they were
credited to the accounts of the executives under the VNQDC Plan.
The amounts of the incentive bonus for 2007 for the named
executive officers were: Carrabba $1,021,706;
Brlas $367,200; Gallagher $381,027;
Calfee $337,240; Kummer $212,023 and
Gunning $182,448. Mr. Carrabba deferred $99,298
of his 2007 incentive bonus into the VNQDC Plan (as shown in
column (b) of the 2007 Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Table below). The amounts representing the
performance-based contributions for 2007 under the 401(k)
Savings Plan and/or the VNQDC Plan for the named executive
officers are: Carrabba $67,500; Brlas
$37,625; Gallagher $38,925; Calfee
$34,475; Kummer $25,975 and Gunning
$18,408. After reaching the maximum levels of pre-tax
contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan, the balance of the
performance-based contributions for 2007 listed were deferred
into the VNQDC Plan as follows: Carrabba $45,000;
Brlas $15,125; Gallagher $16,425;
Calfee $13,545 and Kummer $23,449 (as
shown in column (c) of the 2007 Nonqualified
Compensation Table below). |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts in column (g) reflect the actuarial increase in
the present value of the named executive officers benefits
under the Pension Plan and the Supplemental Retirement Benefit
Plan, both of which are discussed in further detail in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section above under the heading Defined
Benefit Pension Plan, determined using interest rate and
mortality assumptions consistent with those used in Cliffs
financial statements and may include amounts that the named
executive officer is not currently entitled to receive because
his or her benefits are not fully vested. The increase in the
value of the benefits in 2007 of the named executive officers
under the Pension Plan were: Carrabba $159,700;
Brlas $32,200; Gallagher $513,800;
Calfee $512,200 and Kummer $49,000. The
increase in the value of the benefits of the named executive
officers under the Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan in 2007
were zero for each named executive officer. Laurie Brlas and
Ronald Stovash were not eligible for pension or Supplemental
Retirement Benefit Plan benefits in 2007. The amounts for above
market interest in column (g) on deferred compensation in
2007 were: Carrabba $235; Brlas $25;
Gallagher $138; Calfee $390;
Kummer $47 and Gunning $47. |
|
(5) |
|
The amounts in column (h) reflect the combined value of the
named executive officers perquisites attributable to
Cliffs-paid parking, financial services, club memberships,
restricted stock dividends, matching contributions made by and
on behalf of the executives under the 401(k) Saving Plan and the
VNQDC Plan. |
The following table summarizes perquisites in 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k)
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
Plan
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
Svcs.
|
|
Club
|
|
Matching
|
|
Matching
|
|
Stock
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parking
|
|
($)
|
|
Memberships
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Dividends
|
|
($)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(b)
|
|
($)
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
8,093
|
|
|
|
9,815
|
|
|
|
7,313
|
|
|
|
19,688
|
|
|
|
15,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,280
|
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
1,792
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
6,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,361
|
|
Donald J. Gallagher
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
11,238
|
|
|
|
76,918
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,309
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
46,401
|
|
|
|
8,570
|
|
|
|
5,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,168
|
|
Randy L. Kummer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,607
|
|
Ronald G. Stovash
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,375
|
|
|
|
1,016,650
|
|
|
|
1,129,521
|
|
David H. Gunning
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
|
|
7,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,741
|
|
|
|
40,762
|
|
|
|
56,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes tax gross up on financial services paid for
Messrs. Carrabba $184; Gallagher
$293 and Calfee $287.
|
195
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Other Compensation for Mr. Stovash includes $520 payment as
a result of waiving medical benefits, $1,008,130 separation
payment and $8,000 vehicle allowance. Other Compensation for
Mr. Gunning includes $40,762 paid to him as a consulting
fee for serving as Cliffs representative on the board of
directors of Portman and keeping current management apprised of
developments relating to Portman.
|
|
|
|
(6) |
|
The salary of the named executive officers includes their base
salary before salary reductions for the Benefits Choice Plan,
the 401(k) Savings Plan, and the VNQDC Plan. The 2007 401(k)
salary deferrals of the named executive officers were:
Carrabba $7,875; Brlas $11,250;
Gallagher $11,250; Calfee $15,500;
Kummer $15,500; Stovash $15,500 and
Gunning $13,806. The 2007
catch-up
401(k) salary deferrals for the named executive officers were:
Carrabba $4,800; Brlas $4,800;
Gallagher $5,000; Calfee $5,000;
Kummer $5,000; Stovash $5,000 and
Gunning $5,000. The pre-tax contributions for the
compensation earned in 2007 and deferred into the VNQDC Plan on
behalf of the named executive officers were:
Carrabba $33,750; Brlas $26,337 and
Calfee $34,475. |
|
(7) |
|
The amount shown in column (d) for Ms. Brlas reflects
a signing bonus of $115,000 plus a Management Performance
Incentive Plan bonus of $284,700. The Management Performance
Incentive Plan bonus was intended to compensate her for the loss
of a bonus from her prior employment. |
|
(8) |
|
Upon the granting of restricted shares on May 8, 2006,
certain executives were then eligible to retire without
forfeiting the restricted shares, thereby resulting in the
restricted share being taxable to the executive immediately
rather than when the restrictions lapsed. For such executives,
it was determined to pay an amount in cash in lieu of half of
the restricted shares that would otherwise be granted to the
executive. Such cash would provide the executives with
sufficient funds to pay federal, state and local income taxes on
the total value of the restricted shares and the cash payment.
The amounts in column (d) for Mr. Calfee reflect the
cash paid in lieu of one-half of the restricted shares which
would otherwise have been granted to him. |
|
(9) |
|
Effective October 3, 2008, Cliffs and Mr. Kummer
terminated their employment relationship. Mr. Stovash
became employed with Cliffs upon the acquisition of PinnOak on
July 31, 2007 and was terminated from Cliffs effective
November 5, 2007. |
|
(10) |
|
The lump sum present value of the benefits of Mr. Gunning
accrued under the Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan
($537,043) were paid to him upon his retirement on June 1,
2007. |
|
(11) |
|
Mr. Gunning retired from Cliffs on June 1, 2007 after
7 years of service. Upon his retirement, Mr. Gunning
entered into a consulting agreement with Cliffs effective
June 1, 2007. The consulting agreement provides that
Mr. Gunning is to be paid an annual fee in quarterly
installments in U.S. dollars for his service as a member of the
Board of Directors of Portman serving on behalf of Cliffs. The
consulting fee is based on the current retainer paid to the
independent directors of Portman. Effective March 2008, the
Portman directors retainers were increased from A$84,404
to A$95,000 (each, Australian dollars). |
Grants
Of Plan Based Awards
This table discloses in columns (d), (e) and (f) the
potential payouts at the threshold, target and maximum levels of
the awards under the Executive Management Performance Incentive
Plan for 2007. See the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis section above for a description of the
Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan. As is shown in
footnotes 3 and 9 to the 2007 Summary Compensation
Table, the actual payouts for the named executive officers
were: Carrabba $1,021,706; Brlas
$367,200; Gallagher $381,027; Calfee
$337,240; Kummer $212,023; Gunning
$182,448 and Stovash $0.
This table also shows in columns (g), (h) and (i) the
potential payouts at the threshold, target and maximum levels of
the 2007 performance share awards under the 2007 Incentive
Equity Plan. Such performance shares are for a three-year period
ending December 31, 2009.
The table also shows in columns (j) and (k) the actual
numbers of awards granted and the grant date fair value of
(1) restricted share awards under the 1992 Incentive Equity
Plan and 2007 Incentive Equity Plan and (2) retention units
under the Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2007 Incentive Equity
Plan. The 2007 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Stovash
vested on November 5, 2007 upon his termination. The 2007
retention units, granted to all named executive officers
excluding Mr. Stovash, will vest at the end of a three-year
period ending December 31, 2008.
196
2007
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Estimated Future Payout(s)
|
|
Number of
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards (Executive Management
|
|
under Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Incentive Plan)(1)
|
|
Awards (Performance Shares)(2)
|
|
Stock or
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Committee
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Units
|
|
Awards
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
(h)
|
|
(i)
|
|
(j)
|
|
(k)
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/13/2007
|
|
|
|
3/12/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,450
|
|
|
|
62,900
|
|
|
|
94,350
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
2,085,690
|
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
114,000
|
|
|
|
239,148
|
|
|
|
478,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/13/2007
|
|
|
|
3/12/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
20,400
|
|
|
|
30,600
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
676,440
|
|
Donald J. Gallagher
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
118,200
|
|
|
|
248,220
|
|
|
|
496,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/13/2007
|
|
|
|
3/12/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,625
|
|
|
|
21,250
|
|
|
|
31,875
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
704,625
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
104,400
|
|
|
|
219,492
|
|
|
|
438,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/13/2007
|
|
|
|
3/12/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,610
|
|
|
|
11,220
|
|
|
|
16,830
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
372,042
|
|
Randy L. Kummer
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
65,750
|
|
|
|
138,075
|
|
|
|
276,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/13/2007
|
|
|
|
3/12/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,525
|
|
|
|
11,050
|
|
|
|
16,575
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
366,405
|
|
Ronald G. Stovash
|
|
|
2/22/2007
|
|
|
|
2/22/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560,000
|
|
|
|
560,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/31/2007
|
|
|
|
7/31/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
1,316,130
|
(3)
|
David H. Gunning(4)
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
3/27/2007
|
|
|
|
79,100
|
|
|
|
118,755
|
|
|
|
237,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/13/2007
|
|
|
|
3/12/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,705
|
|
|
|
29,410
|
|
|
|
44,115
|
|
|
|
5,190
|
|
|
|
200,777
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Except as otherwise indicated, the amounts in column
(d) reflect the threshold payment level under the Executive
Management Performance Incentive Plan, which is 25 percent
of the target amount shown in column (f). The amount shown in
column (e) is 50 percent of the amount shown in column
(f). These amounts are based on the individuals current
salary and position. Mr. Stovashs target annual
incentive was 80% of base salary and ranged from 0% to 140% of
target. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts in column (g) reflect the threshold payout
level of performance shares under the 2007 Incentive Equity
Plan, which is 50 percent of the target amount shown in
column (h). The amount shown in column (i) is
150 percent of such target amount. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Stovash was granted restricted shares pursuant to his
employment with Cliffs in connection with the acquisition of
PinnOak Resources Ltd. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Gunnings Executive Management Performance
Incentive Plan bonus, performance share and retention unit
awards are pro-rated for his retirement in 2007. |
Outstanding
Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End
The following table shows in columns (b) and (c) the
actual numbers of shares, and the fair market value of all
(1) unvested restricted share awards under the 1992
Incentive Equity Plan and (2) unvested retention units
under the Long-Term Incentive Plan or 2007 Incentive Equity Plan
outstanding on December 31, 2007. The fair market value of
each restricted share and retention unit on December 31,
2007 was $50.40.
The table also shows in columns (d) and (e), for the named
executive officers, the actual numbers of performance shares and
the fair market value as of December 31, 2007 of all
unvested and unearned performance shares assuming a market value
of $50.40 per share (the closing market price of Cliffs
common shares on December 31, 2007) and assumes that
the performance shares pay off at the target level.
197
Outstanding
Equity Awards At 2007 Fiscal Year-End Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Market or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Value of
|
|
Shares,
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Units
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of Stock
|
|
Units of
|
|
or Other
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That
|
|
Stock
|
|
Rights That
|
|
Rights That
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
That Have
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
Not
|
|
Vested
|
|
Vested
|
Name
|
|
Grant
|
|
Vesting
|
|
(#)
|
|
Vested ($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
(b)(2)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
|
|
|
05/22/05
|
|
|
|
05/23/08
|
|
|
|
5,066
|
(3)
|
|
|
255,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03/14/06
|
|
|
|
03/14/09
|
|
|
|
55,812
|
(3)
|
|
|
2,812,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/06
|
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
|
4,980
|
(4)
|
|
|
250,992
|
|
|
|
28,220
|
(5)
|
|
|
1,422,288
|
|
|
|
|
09/01/06
|
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
|
4,980
|
(6)
|
|
|
250,992
|
|
|
|
28,220
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,422,288
|
|
|
|
|
03/13/07
|
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
(4)
|
|
|
559,440
|
|
|
|
62,900
|
(5)
|
|
|
3,170,160
|
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
|
12/11/06
|
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
(7)
|
|
|
120,960
|
|
|
|
13,600
|
(7)
|
|
|
685,440
|
|
|
|
|
03/13/07
|
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
(4)
|
|
|
181,440
|
|
|
|
20,400
|
(5)
|
|
|
1,028,160
|
|
Donald J. Gallagher
|
|
|
03/14/06
|
|
|
|
03/14/09
|
|
|
|
34,884
|
(3)
|
|
|
1,758,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/06
|
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
(4)
|
|
|
127,008
|
|
|
|
14,280
|
(5)
|
|
|
719,712
|
|
|
|
|
03/13/07
|
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
(4)
|
|
|
189,000
|
|
|
|
21,250
|
(5)
|
|
|
1,071,000
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
03/14/06
|
|
|
|
03/14/09
|
|
|
|
17,440
|
(3)
|
|
|
878,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/06
|
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
(4)
|
|
|
117,936
|
|
|
|
13,260
|
(5)
|
|
|
668,304
|
|
|
|
|
03/13/07
|
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
(4)
|
|
|
99,792
|
|
|
|
11,220
|
(5)
|
|
|
565,488
|
|
Randy L. Kummer
|
|
|
03/14/06
|
|
|
|
03/14/09
|
|
|
|
30,232
|
(3)
|
|
|
1,523,693
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
(5)
|
|
|
479,808
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/06
|
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
|
1,680
|
(4)
|
|
|
84,672
|
|
|
|
11,050
|
(5)
|
|
|
556,920
|
|
|
|
|
03/13/07
|
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
(4)
|
|
|
98,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald G. Stovash(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David H. Gunning(9)
|
|
|
05/08/06
|
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
|
3,660
|
(4)
|
|
|
184,464
|
|
|
|
20,740
|
(5)
|
|
|
1,045,296
|
|
|
|
|
03/13/07
|
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
|
|
5,190
|
(4)
|
|
|
261,576
|
|
|
|
29,410
|
(5)
|
|
|
1,482,264
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Normally, outstanding options would be listed in this table.
There are no outstanding stock options for any named executive
officers. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown in this column reflect the number of unvested
restricted shares granted under the Incentive Equity Plan and
the number of retention units under the Long-Term Incentive Plan
or 2007 Incentive Equity Plan. Unless otherwise indicated, all
of these awards vest on the last day of the second year
following the year in which the award was granted. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects a grant of restricted shares. |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects a grant of retention units. Grant dates of 5/8/06,
9/1/06 and 12/11/06 pertain to the
2006-2008
performance period, and the grant date of 3/13/07 pertains to
the
2007-2009
performance period. |
|
(5) |
|
Reflects grants of performance shares. Grant dates of 5/8/06,
9/1/06 and 12/11/06 pertain to the
2006-2008
performance period, and the grant date of 3/13/07 pertains to
the
2007-2009
performance period. |
|
(6) |
|
This represents additional performance shares (28,220) and
retention units (4,980) for the
2006-2008
performance period granted to Mr. Carrabba upon becoming
Cliffs Chief Executive Officer. |
198
|
|
|
(7) |
|
This represents performance shares (13,600) and retention units
(2,400) for the
2006-2008
performance period granted to Ms. Brlas upon becoming
Cliffs Chief Financial Officer. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr. Stovash did not have any outstanding equity as of
December 31, 2007. |
|
(9) |
|
Mr. Gunning received a grant of restricted shares on
3/14/06 that vests on 3/14/09. The shares became non-forfeitable
upon his retirement. Restrictions were removed from
50 percent of the award to satisfy tax obligations. |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
Columns (b) and (c) in the following table set forth
certain information regarding performance shares, retention
units and restricted share awards that vested during 2007 for
the named executive officers based on the applicable fair market
value. None of Cliffs named executive officers had stock
options during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and
thus could not exercise them.
2007
Option Exercises And Stock Vested Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)(1)
|
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba(2)
|
|
|
5,066
|
(3)
|
|
|
186,479
|
|
|
|
|
17,402
|
(4)
|
|
|
1,042,032
|
|
|
|
|
2,280
|
(5)
|
|
|
114,912
|
|
Laurie Brlas(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald J. Gallagher
|
|
|
14,600
|
(6)
|
|
|
527,571
|
|
|
|
|
18,776
|
(4)
|
|
|
1,124,307
|
|
|
|
|
2,460
|
(5)
|
|
|
123,984
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
18,776
|
(4)
|
|
|
1,124,307
|
|
|
|
|
2,460
|
(5)
|
|
|
123,984
|
|
Randy L. Kummer
|
|
|
24,336
|
(7)
|
|
|
1,226,534
|
|
|
|
|
13,280
|
(4)
|
|
|
795,206
|
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
(5)
|
|
|
87,696
|
|
Ronald G. Stovash(2)
|
|
|
38,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
1,609,490
|
|
David H. Gunning
|
|
|
50,000
|
(9)
|
|
|
1,435,250
|
|
|
|
|
41,860
|
(10)
|
|
|
1,803,747
|
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
(4)
|
|
|
1,502,269
|
|
|
|
|
3,286
|
(5)
|
|
|
165,614
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value realized shown in column (c) is computed by
multiplying the number of restricted shares, performance shares
and retention units by the closing price of a Cliffs common
share on the date of vesting. Except as otherwise noted, all
awards vested on December 31, 2007. The closing price of a
Cliffs common share on December 31, 2007 was $50.40. |
|
(2) |
|
The executive did not participate in the Long-Term Incentive
Plan for the
2004-2006
performance period. |
|
(3) |
|
The restricted shares were granted on May 23, 2005. They
vested on May 23, 2007 with a fair market value of $36.81. |
|
(4) |
|
This represents a performance share award granted on
March 8, 2005 for the
2005-2007
performance period paid out to participants on February 26,
2008 at a fair market value of $59.88 per share on
February 22, 2007. The performance shares would have been,
based on the performance criteria, paid out at 175 percent. |
199
|
|
|
|
|
However, because the maximum cap on payments, they were actually
paid at 77 percent of the uncapped value. |
|
(5) |
|
This represents an award of retention units under the Long-Term
Incentive Plan paid out to participants for the
2005-2007
performance period. |
|
(6) |
|
Pursuant to Mr. Gallaghers restricted stock
agreement, the shares became non-forfeitable upon his retirement
eligibility. The shares vested on May 4, 2007 with a fair
market value of $36.14. |
|
(7) |
|
The restricted shares were granted on March 8, 2005. They
vested on December 31, 2007 with a fair market value of
$50.40. |
|
(8) |
|
The restricted shares were granted on July 31, 2007.
Pursuant to provisions in Mr. Stovashs restricted
share agreement, the shares vested on November 5, 2007 with
a fair market value of $42.36 upon his involuntary termination
without cause. |
|
(9) |
|
The restricted shares were granted on March 10, 2003. They
vested on March 12, 2007 with a fair market value of $28.71. |
|
(10) |
|
The restricted shares were granted on March 14, 2006.
Mr. Gunning retired from Cliffs on June 1, 2007. The
grant became non-forfeitable upon his retirement. Restrictions
were removed on 50 percent of the shares to satisfy the tax
obligation. The balance of the shares will be released on
March 14, 2009. |
Pension
Benefits
The table below shows the present value of accumulated benefits
payable to each named executive officer, except
Mr. Stovash, and the number of years of service credited to
each such named executive officer under the Pension Plan and the
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan. The calculation was
determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions
consistent with those used in Cliffs financial statements.
The Pension Plan provides participants, including the named
executive officers, with the greater of:
(a) the sum of:
(1) For service with Cliffs through June 30, 2008, his
or her accrued benefit under the plans Final Average Pay
Formula described below; and
(2) For service with Cliffs after June 30, 2008, his
or her cash balance credits and interest under the Cash Balance
Formula described below; or
(b) the sum of:
(1) For service with Cliffs through June 30, 2003, his
or her accrued benefit under the Final Average Pay Formula
described below; and
(2) For service with Cliffs after June 30, 2003, his
or her cash balance credits and interest after June 30,
2003 under the Cash Balance Formula described below.
The Final Average Pay Formula provides a benefit that is
generally based on a 1.65 percent pension formula. For each
year of service up to June 30, 2003 or June 30, 2008,
as the case may be, the plan provides 1.65 percent of
Average Monthly Compensation. Average Monthly Compensation is
defined as the average annual compensation earned during the 60
consecutive months providing the highest such average during the
last 120 months preceding the applicable date. The benefit
is subject to an offset of 50 percent of Social Security
benefits through the applicable date. Benefits are payable as an
annuity, unreduced for early commencement, upon the attainment
of normal retirement at age 65, or at 30 years of
service. Benefits are payable as an annuity reduced for early
commencement upon the attainment of age 55 with
15 years of service.
The Cash Balance Formula provides a benefit payable at any time
equal to the value of a notional cash balance account. For each
calendar quarter, after the applicable date a credit is made to
the account equal to a percentage of his or her pay ranging from
four percent to ten percent based upon his or her age and
service with transitional pay credits up to 13 percent
during the transition period from June 30, 2003 to
June 30, 2008. Interest is credited to the
200
account balance on a quarterly basis. At retirement or
termination of employment, the accumulated account balance can
be paid as either a lump sum or actuarially equivalent annuity.
The compensation used to determine benefits under the Pension
Plan is the sum of salary and annual incentive compensation paid
under the Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan to a
participant during a calendar year. Pensionable earnings for
each of Cliffs named executive officers during 2007
include the amount shown for 2007 in column (c) of the
2007 Summary Compensation Table above, plus the
amount of incentive compensation earned in 2006 and paid in 2007.
The Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan generally provides the
named executive officers with the benefits which would have been
payable under the Pension Plan if certain Code limitations did
not apply to the Pension Plan. The Supplemental Retirement
Benefit Plan was amended effective for 2006 and future accruals
to eliminate the annual payments and to provide that
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan accruals will be paid at
retirement. The Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan provides
for accruals to be paid out at retirement.
2007
Pension Benefits Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Present Value
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
|
of Accumulated
|
|
|
During
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)(2)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
|
|
Salaried Pension Plan
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
39,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
999,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
Salaried Pension Plan
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
20,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald J. Gallagher
|
|
Salaried Pension Plan
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
731,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
815,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
Salaried Pension Plan
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
1,263,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
923,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy L. Kummer
|
|
Salaried Pension Plan
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
88,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
63,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald G. Stovash(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David H. Gunning
|
|
Salaried Pension Plan
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
190,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
533,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Stovash was not eligible to participate in pension
benefits. |
|
(2) |
|
The present value of accrued benefits were calculated using a
6.00 percent discount rate, the assumption that the
executive would receive the benefits at age 65 unless he or
she is entitled to an unreduced benefit at an earlier age, and
using the RP2000 mortality table. |
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
Pursuant to the VNQDC Plan, the named executive officers are
permitted to defer, on a pre-tax basis, up to 50 percent of
their base salary, all or a portion of their annual incentive
under the Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan, and
their stock award or cash award that may be payable under the
Long-Term Incentive Plan. Cash compensation awards deferred into
stock units will be matched with a 25 percent match by
Cliffs.
Cash deferrals earn interest at the Moodys Corporate
Average Bond Yield rate. Stock awards, which can only be
deferred into stock units, are denominated in Cliffs common
shares and vary with Cliffs share price performance.
201
Additionally, the VNQDC Plan provides that if a participant is
entitled to receive a discretionary performance based
contribution under the 401(k) Savings Plan but is limited in the
amounts which can be contributed to the 401(k) Savings Plan by
certain Code limitations, then the balance of such performance
based contribution will be credited to the participants
account under the VNQDC Plan. Similarly, if a named executive
officers salary reduction contributions to the 401(k)
Savings Plan are limited by Code limitations, the amount that
exceeds the limit will be credited to the executives
account under the VNQDC Plan together with the Cliffs match he
or she would have had under the 401(k) Savings Plan.
This table discloses in column (b), Executive
Contributions in Last Fiscal Year, the contributions by
each named executive officer to the VNQDC Plan. The
contributions include pre-tax contributions of salary, pre-tax
contributions of incentive bonuses, pre-tax contributions of
stock awards, and pre-tax contributions of cash awards.
Column (c) of the Table, Registrant Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year, includes matching contributions Cliffs
made of behalf of the named executive officers to the VNQDC Plan
and performance-based contributions authorized under the 401(k)
Savings Plan that were credited to the VNQDC Plan.
Column (d) of the Table, Aggregate Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year, includes interest earned on cash deferrals
and dividends earned on deferred shares.
2007
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
in Last Fiscal
|
|
|
in Last Fiscal
|
|
|
Last Fiscal
|
|
|
Withdrawals /
|
|
|
Last Fiscal
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
Year-End
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)(1)
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
|
|
(d)(3)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)(2)(4)
|
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
|
|
|
133,048
|
(2)
|
|
|
64,688
|
|
|
|
9,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,138
|
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
|
26,337
|
|
|
|
21,175
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,457
|
|
Donald J. Gallagher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,425
|
|
|
|
2,536,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,006,763
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
34,475
|
|
|
|
18,765
|
|
|
|
1,077,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,401,240
|
|
Randy L. Kummer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,449
|
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,319
|
|
Ronald G. Stovash(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David H. Gunning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,005
|
|
|
|
61,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts in column (b) represents pre-tax contributions
of salary, incentive bonuses, and performance share and
retention unit awards to the VNQDC Plan by the named executive
officers. Mr. Carrabba deferred $99,298 of his 2007 bonus
and $33,750 of his salary into the VNQDC Plan. Ms. Brlas
and Mr. Calfee deferred only salary. All of these amounts
are reported as 2007 compensation in the 2007 Summary
Compensation Table above. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts in column (c) reflect the sum of
(i) Cliffs matching contributions made on behalf of
the named executive officers to the VNQDC Plan, and
(ii) performance-based contributions authorized under the
401(k) Savings Plan but that were credited to the VNQDC Plan.
The matching contributions for the named executive officers
were: Carrabba $19,688; Brlas $6,050;
and Calfee $5,220. The performance-based
contributions to the VNQDC Plan for the named executive officers
were: Carrabba $45,000; Brlas $15,125;
Gallagher $16,425; Calfee $13,545; and
Kummer $23,449. All of these amounts are reported as
2007 compensation in the 2007 Summary Compensation
Table above. Please note that the amounts shown in column
(b) for Mr. Carrabba and in columns (c) and
(f) differ from the amounts shown in the respective columns
of the 2007 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table
included in Cliffs proxy statement for the 2007 annual
meeting as a result of recent SEC guidance to reflect certain
amounts contributed to the VNQDC Plan during 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts in column (d) reflect the sum of
(i) interest earned on cash deferrals, (ii) dividends
earned on deferred shares, and (iii) the increase (or
decrease) in the value of deferred common shares held in the
participants account from January 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2007. The interest earned by the named
executive officers was: Carrabba $9,370;
Brlas $842; Gallagher $7,623;
Calfee $21,350; |
202
|
|
|
|
|
Kummer $2,422 and Gunning $3,005. The
dividends earned by the named executive officers were:
Gallagher $22,399 and Calfee $9,892. A
portion of dividends was reinvested into deferred common shares.
The change in valuation of the deferred common shares for
Messrs. Gallagher and Calfee was $2,506,840 and $1,046,310,
respectively. None of these amounts are reported as 2007
compensation in the 2007 Summary Compensation Table
above. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Gallaghers aggregate balance includes 96,356
deferred common shares and Mr. Calfees aggregate
balance includes 39,800 deferred common shares. Cliffs common
shares had a closing market price of $50.40 on December 31,
2007. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Stovash was not eligible to participate in nonqualified
deferred compensation. |
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
The tables below reflect the compensation payable to
Mr. Kummer and to each of the other named executive
officers currently serving Cliffs in the event of termination of
such executives employment under a variety of different
circumstances, including the named executive officers
voluntary termination, involuntary not-for-cause termination,
and termination following a change of control. The amounts shown
assume in all cases that such termination was effective as of
December 31, 2007, and, unless indicated otherwise, reflect
the two-for-one stock split effective May 15, 2008. All
amounts shown are estimates of the amounts that would be paid
out to the executives upon their termination. The actual amounts
to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such
executives separation from Cliffs. Effective
October 3, 2008, Cliffs and Mr. Kummer terminated
their employment relationship. In connection with this
termination of the employment relationship, Cliffs and
Mr. Kummer entered into the separation agreement described
in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section above under the heading
Separation Agreement. Although
applicable rules and regulations require Cliffs to provide the
potential payments disclosure for Mr. Kummer, the
compensation and benefits Mr. Kummer will receive in
connection with this termination of the employment relationship
are as provided for in the separation agreement.
Payments
Made Upon All Terminations
If a named executive officers employment terminates, he or
she is entitled to receive certain amounts earned during his or
her term of employment no matter the cause of termination. Such
amounts include:
|
|
|
|
|
Salary through the date of termination;
|
|
|
|
Unused vacation pay;
|
|
|
|
Accrued and vested benefits under the Pension Plan, Supplemental
Retirement Benefit Plan, 401(k) Savings Plan, and VNQDC Plan;
|
|
|
|
Undistributed performance shares and unpaid retention units for
periods which have been completed; and
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares where the restrictions have lapsed.
|
Additional
Payments Upon Involuntary Termination Without
Cause
In the event that a named executive officer is terminated
involuntarily without cause, he or she would typically receive
the following additional payments or benefits in the sole
discretionary judgment of the Compensation Committee, taking
into account the nature of the termination, the length of the
executives service with Cliffs, and the executives
grade level. There is no legally binding agreement requiring
that any such payments or benefits be paid to any named
executive officer except in the case of a change in control
prior to the termination:
|
|
|
|
|
Severance payments;
|
|
|
|
Continued health insurance benefits;
|
|
|
|
Out-placement services; and
|
|
|
|
Financial services.
|
203
Since all such benefits are at the discretion of the
Compensation Committee, it is impossible to estimate the amount
that would be paid in such circumstances.
On November 5, 2007, Mr. Stovashs employment was
terminated without cause. Within its discretion, Cliffs agreed
to pay Mr. Stovash or provide Mr. Stovash with:
|
|
|
|
|
$78,000 representing pay until December 31, 2007;
|
|
|
|
A lump sum payment of $930,000 representing one years
salary ($500,000), one years target bonus ($400,000), one
years matching employer contributions under the applicable
401(k) plan ($18,000) and one years vehicle allowance;
|
|
|
|
Vesting of his restricted shares granted on July 31, 2007
valued at $1,609,490;
|
|
|
|
The benefits of his membership in the PinnOak Resources Employee
Equity Incentive Plan valued at $2,500,000;
|
|
|
|
Continued coverage under Cliffs dental plans until
December 31, 2007 valued at $65;
|
|
|
|
Use, at his own expense, of the Laurel Valley Golf Club and the
Duquesne Club; and
|
|
|
|
One executive physical examination at the Greenbrier Clinic.
|
In return for such benefits, Mr. Stovash agreed not to
disclose Cliffs trade secrets and not to become employed
by certain of Cliffs competitors.
Additional
Payments Upon Retirement
None of the named executive officers were eligible to retire on
December 31, 2007 other than Mr. Calfee and
Mr. Gallagher. In the event of any named executive
officers retirement, the following additional amounts will
be paid and additional benefits will be provided, in addition to
the amounts payable to all terminated salaried employees:
|
|
|
|
|
A pro-rata portion of the annual incentive award under the
Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan for the year in
which he or she retires;
|
|
|
|
Any unpaid annual incentive award under the Executive Management
Performance Incentive Plan for the year prior to the year of
retirement;
|
|
|
|
A pro-rata portion of his or her performance shares and
retention units will be paid when such shares and units would
otherwise be paid;
|
|
|
|
A pro-rata portion of any performance based contribution to the
401(k) Savings Plan and the VNQDC Plan for the year of
retirement;
|
|
|
|
He or she will keep his or her restricted shares and the
restrictions on sale of the shares will lapse at the end of the
restriction period;
|
|
|
|
He or she will be entitled to retiree medical and life insurance
for the rest of his or her life and the life of his or her
spouse on the same terms as any other salaried employee hired
prior to 1993; and
|
|
|
|
He or she will become vested in certain matching contributions
under the VNQDC Plan provided that the amounts are not withdrawn
until the end of the five year vesting period.
|
On June 1, 2007, Mr. Gunning retired from Cliffs after
seven years of service. Because of his retirement,
Mr. Gunning will receive the payments and benefits
described above and described in the section under the heading
Payments Made Upon All Terminations,
except that he is not entitled to retiree medical and life
insurance since he was not hired until after the freezing of
such benefit. Upon his retirement, Mr. Gunning entered into
a consulting agreement with Cliffs effective June 1, 2007.
The consulting agreement provides that Mr. Gunning is to be
paid an annual fee in quarterly installments in
U.S. dollars for his service as a member of the Board of
Directors of Portman serving on behalf of Cliffs. The consulting
fee is based on the current retainer paid to independent
directors of Portman.
204
Additional
Payments Because of Change in Control Without
Termination
Under the terms of the Restricted Shares Agreements and
Performance Share Agreements, the named executive officers are
entitled to the following benefits upon the occurrence of a
change in control, regardless of whether the employment of the
named executive officer is terminated:
|
|
|
|
|
The restrictions on the restricted shares lapse immediately;
|
|
|
|
The performance shares vest immediately; and
|
|
|
|
The retention units vest immediately.
|
For this purpose, a change in control generally
means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(1) Any one person, or more than one person acting as a
group acquires ownership of stock of Cliffs that, together with
stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50% of
the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock
of Cliffs (subject to certain exceptions);
(2) Any one person, or more than one person acting as a
group, acquires (or has acquired during the
12-month
period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such
person or persons) ownership of stock of Cliffs possessing 35%
or more of the total voting power of the stock of Cliffs;
(3) A majority of members of the board of directors of
Cliffs is replaced during any
12-month
period by directors whose appointment or election is not
endorsed by a majority of the members of the board of directors
prior to the date of the appointment or election; or
(4) Any one person, or more than one person acting as a
group, acquires (or has acquired during the
12-month
period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such
person or persons) assets from Cliffs that have a total gross
fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross
fair market value of all of the assets of Cliffs immediately
prior to such acquisition or acquisitions.
Acquisitions of Cliffs stock pursuant to certain business
combination or similar transactions described in Cliffs
relevant equity incentive plans, however, will not constitute a
change in control if, generally speaking, in each case,
immediately after such business transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
the owners of Cliffs stock immediately prior to the business
transaction own more than 55% of the entity resulting from the
business transaction in substantially the same proportions as
their pre-business transaction ownership of Cliffs stock;
|
|
|
|
no one person, or more than one person acting as a group
(subject to certain exceptions), owns 30% or more of the
combined voting power of the entity resulting from the business
transaction; and
|
|
|
|
at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of
the entity resulting from the business transaction were members
of the incumbent board of directors of Cliffs when the business
transaction agreement was signed or approved by Cliffs
board of directors. For purposes of this exception, the
incumbent board of directors of Cliffs generally means those
directors who were serving as of August 11, 2008 (or a
prior date in the case of certain pre-2007 equity awards) or
whose appointment or election was endorsed by a majority of the
incumbent members prior to the date of such appointment or
election.
|
Except as it pertains to the definition of business combination
or similar transactions, persons will be considered to be acting
as a group if they are owners of a corporation that enters into
a merger, consolidation, purchase or acquisition of stock, or
similar business transaction with Cliffs. Additionally, for
certain equity awards made prior to the 2007 Incentive Equity
Plan, issuances of Cliffs stock approved by the incumbent board
of directors of Cliffs, acquisitions by Cliffs of its own stock
and acquisitions of Cliffs stock by Cliffs employee
benefit plans or related trusts also will not constitute a
change in control.
The Compensation Committee amended the 2007 Incentive Equity
Plan to correct the definition of a Change in
Control so that performance shares and retention units
awarded in 2007 and 2008 will not be earned as a result of the
consummation of the merger. The Compensation Committee made this
amendment, which was approved by the
205
board of directors, because the Compensation Committee was of
the view that, at the time that it approved the plan in 2007, it
did not intend for awards under the plan to become earned in
connection with transactions such as the merger. The
Compensation Committee was advised by independent counsel with
respect to the amendment of the plan. In the absence of this
amendment, the performance share and retention unit awards would
have been considered to be earned at the time of the merger at
100% of target levels, regardless of Cliffs performance,
and required to be paid out in cash within 10 days of the
merger. Absent the amendment to the 2007 Incentive Equity Plan,
Cliffs estimates the total aggregate amount of the payments that
would have been required to be made with respect to these
accelerated performance shares and retention units would be
approximately $69,180,881, assuming a price per Cliffs common
share of $111.46, which was the closing price of Cliffs common
shares on the NYSE on the last trading day prior to the
announcement of the merger. It is possible that the amendment of
the plan could be subject to challenge.
Additional
Payments Upon Termination Without Cause after Change in
Control
Each of the named executive officers has a written Severance
Agreement which applies only in the event of termination during
the two years after a change in control. If one of the named
executive officers is involuntarily terminated during the two
years after a change in control, for a reason other than cause,
he or she will be entitled to the following additional benefits:
(1) A lump sum payment in an amount equal to three times
(two times for Mr. Kummer) the sum of (A) base salary
(at the highest rate in effect for any period prior to the
termination date), plus (B) annual incentive pay at the
target level for the current year or prior year whichever is
greater.
(2) Coverage for a period of 36 months (24 months
for Mr. Kummer) following the termination date, by health,
life insurance and disability benefits.
(3) A lump sum payment in an amount equal to the sum of the
future pension benefits which the executive would have been
entitled to receive three years (two years for Mr. Kummer)
following the termination date under the Supplemental Retirement
Benefit Plan.
(4) Pro-rata incentive pay at target levels for the year in
which the termination date occurs.
(5) Outplacement services in an amount up to
15 percent of the executives base salary.
(6) Post-retirement medical, hospital, surgical and
prescription drug coverage for the lifetime of the executive,
his or her spouse and any eligible dependents at the normal
participant cost based on the executives age.
(7) A
gross-up
payment for any taxes imposed on the executive under Code
Section 4999 relating to excess parachute payments.
(8) He or she will become vested in certain matching
contributions under the VNQDC Plan provided that the amounts are
not withdrawn until the end of the five-year vesting period.
(9) He or she will be provided perquisites for a period of
36 months (24 months for Mr. Kummer) comparable
to the perquisites he or she was receiving before the
termination of his employment or the change in control whichever
was greater.
Similar benefits are paid if the executive voluntarily
terminates his or her employment during the two years following
a change in control by reason of any one of the following
happening:
(1) Failure to maintain the executive in the office or
position, or a substantially equivalent office or position,
which the executive held immediately prior to a change in
control;
(2) (A) A significant adverse change in the nature or
scope of the executives authorities, powers, functions,
responsibilities or duties, (B) a reduction in the
executives base salary, (C) a reduction in the
executives opportunity to receive incentive pay, or
(D) the termination or denial of the executives
rights to employee benefits or a reduction in the scope or value
thereof;
206
(3) A change in circumstances which has substantially
hindered executives performance of his or her job;
(4) Certain corporate transactions;
(5) Cliffs relocates its principal executive offices in
excess of 25 miles from the prior location; or
(6) Breach of the Severance Agreement.
For purposes of the Severance Agreements, cause
generally means termination of an executive for the following
acts: (1) conviction of a criminal violation involving
fraud, embezzlement or theft in connection with his or her
duties or in the course of his or her employment with Cliffs or
any subsidiary of Cliffs; (2) intentional wrongful damage
to property of Cliffs or any subsidiary of Cliffs;
(3) intentional wrongful disclosure of secret processes or
confidential information of Cliffs or any subsidiary of Cliffs;
or (4) intentional wrongful engagement in any Competitive
Activity.
In order to receive benefits under the Severance Agreements, the
named executive officers may not disclose Cliffs
confidential and proprietary information, may not go into
competition with Cliffs, and may not solicit Cliffs
employees to leave Cliffs employment.
Potential
Termination Payments to Named Executive Officers
The following tables show the benefits payable to Mr. Kummer and
to the named executive officers currently serving Cliffs upon
various types of terminations of employment and change in
control assuming an effective date of December 31, 2007
(provided, however, that Mr. Kummers actual compensation
and benefits are described in the separation agreement as
discussed above):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph A. Carrabba
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Cause after
|
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Cash Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,200,000
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,068,285
|
|
|
$
|
3,068,285
|
|
|
$
|
3,068,285
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,947,611
|
|
|
$
|
6,014,736
|
|
|
$
|
6,014,736
|
|
Retention Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
520,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,424
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,424
|
|
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,579,307
|
|
Retiree Welfare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
122,563
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred
|
|
$
|
201,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
201,825
|
|
|
$
|
201,825
|
|
|
$
|
201,825
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Welfare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,886
|
|
Outplacement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,000
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,545
|
|
Tax
Gross-Ups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,971,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
201,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,737,888
|
|
|
$
|
10,346,270
|
|
|
$
|
23,113,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie Brlas
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Cause after
|
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Cash Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,824,000
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
228,000
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
798,115
|
|
|
$
|
1,713,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,713,600
|
|
Retention Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
140,844
|
|
|
$
|
302,400
|
|
|
$
|
302,400
|
|
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,777
|
|
Retiree Welfare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred
|
|
$
|
33,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,230
|
|
|
$
|
33,230
|
|
|
$
|
33,230
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Welfare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,886
|
|
Outplacement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,000
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,338
|
|
Tax
Gross-Ups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,815,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
33,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
972,189
|
|
|
$
|
2,049,230
|
|
|
$
|
6,171,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William R. Calfee
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Cause after
|
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Cash Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,670,400
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
313,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
208,800
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
878,976
|
|
|
$
|
878,976
|
|
|
$
|
878,976
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
632,906
|
|
|
$
|
1,233,792
|
|
|
$
|
1,233,792
|
|
Retention Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,689
|
|
|
$
|
217,728
|
|
|
$
|
217,728
|
|
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
$
|
2,268,187
|
|
|
$
|
2,268,187
|
|
|
$
|
2,268,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,455,437
|
|
Retiree Welfare
|
|
$
|
146,020
|
|
|
$
|
146,020
|
|
|
$
|
146,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
148,405
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred
|
|
$
|
2,387,695
|
|
|
$
|
2,387,695
|
|
|
$
|
2,387,695
|
|
|
$
|
2,387,695
|
|
|
$
|
2,387,695
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Welfare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,886
|
|
Outplacement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,200
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,341
|
|
Tax
Gross-Ups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,801,902
|
|
|
$
|
5,115,102
|
|
|
$
|
6,425,473
|
|
|
$
|
4,718,191
|
|
|
$
|
9,373,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald J. Gallagher
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Cause after
|
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Cash Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,891,200
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
354,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
236,400
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,758,154
|
|
|
$
|
1,758,154
|
|
|
$
|
1,758,154
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
835,173
|
|
|
$
|
1,790,712
|
|
|
$
|
1,790,712
|
|
Retention Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
147,383
|
|
|
$
|
316,008
|
|
|
$
|
316,008
|
|
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
$
|
1,629,341
|
|
|
$
|
1,629,341
|
|
|
$
|
1,629,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,060,387
|
|
Retiree Welfare
|
|
$
|
140,432
|
|
|
$
|
140,432
|
|
|
$
|
140,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
157,608
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred
|
|
$
|
4,990,338
|
|
|
$
|
4,990,338
|
|
|
$
|
4,990,338
|
|
|
$
|
4,990,338
|
|
|
$
|
4,990,338
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Welfare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,886
|
|
Outplacement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,100
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
242,537
|
|
Tax
Gross-Ups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,208,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,760,111
|
|
|
$
|
7,114,711
|
|
|
$
|
9,500,821
|
|
|
$
|
8,855,212
|
|
|
$
|
15,743,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy L. Kummer
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Cause after
|
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Cash Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
789,000
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
131,500
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,523,693
|
|
|
$
|
1,523,693
|
|
|
$
|
1,523,693
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
504,565
|
|
|
$
|
1,036,728
|
|
|
$
|
1,036,728
|
|
Retention Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
89,041
|
|
|
$
|
182,952
|
|
|
$
|
182,952
|
|
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
$
|
164,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
164,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
193,398
|
|
Retiree Welfare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred
|
|
$
|
45,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,870
|
|
|
$
|
45,870
|
|
|
$
|
45,870
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Welfare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,420
|
|
Outplacement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,450
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,708
|
|
Tax
Gross-Ups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
210,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,327,641
|
|
|
$
|
2,789,243
|
|
|
$
|
3,969,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209
Directors
Compensation
Prior to May 1, 2008, Cliffs directors who are not Cliffs
employees received an annual retainer fee of $32,500 and an
annual equity award of $32,500. Effective May 1, 2008, the
annual retainer fee and annual equity awards for independent
directors of Cliffs were increased to $50,000 and $75,000,
respectively. Board meeting fees and committee meeting fees are
$1,500 and $1,000, respectively. The Lead Director annual
retainer fee is $10,000. Annual committee chair retainers are as
follows: Audit Committee, $10,000, and Board Affairs, Finance,
and Compensation Committees, $5,000. Effective July 8,
2008, the Strategic Advisory Committee, originally an Ad Hoc
Committee, was formalized by the Cliffs board of directors to be
a standing committee. The committee chair of the Strategic
Advisory Committee receives an annual retainer of $5,000.
Employee directors receive no compensation for their service as
directors.
The Nonemployee Directors Compensation Plan (as Amended
and Restated as of January 1, 2005), which Cliffs refers to
as the Directors Plan, implements the annual equity grant
program referenced above. Directors who are under age 69 on
the date of the annual meeting receive an automatic annual grant
of $75,000 worth of restricted shares with a three-year vesting
requirement. Nonemployee directors who are 69 years of age
or older on the date of the Cliffs annual meeting receive an
automatic annual grant of $75,000 worth of Cliffs common shares
(with no restrictions).
The Directors Plan also provides that a director should
own by the end of a four-year period either (1) 4,000 or
more common shares or (2) common shares having a market
value of at least $100,000, in accordance with the current
Director Share Ownership Guidelines. If a nonemployee director
meets these guidelines in December of each year, the director
may elect to receive all or a portion of his or her annual
retainer of $50,000 for the following year in cash. If the
director does not meet these guidelines, the director is
required to receive an equivalent value of $20,000 (increased
from $15,000 as of May 1, 2008) in Cliffs common
shares until he or she meets one of the two guidelines.
Nonemployee directors may elect to receive up to
100 percent of their retainer and other fees in common
shares. In addition, the Directors Plan gives nonemployee
directors the opportunity to defer all or a portion of their
annual retainer and other fees, whether payable in cash or
common shares. Beginning with the 2006 annual equity award,
nonemployee directors may elect to receive deferred shares in
lieu of their annual equity award of restricted common shares or
common shares. A director may also elect that all cash dividends
with respect to such restricted shares be deferred and
reinvested in additional common shares during the restriction
period of such restricted shares. Those additional common shares
are subject to the same restrictions as the underlying award.
Cash dividends not subject to the restriction described above
will be paid to the director without restriction.
Nonemployee directors who joined the board before
January 1, 1999 were able to participate in either the
Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors adopted in 1984,
which Cliffs refers to as the 1984 Plan, or the Nonemployee
Directors Supplemental Compensation Plan established in 1995,
which Cliffs refers to as the 1995 Plan. The 1984 Plan provides
that a nonemployee director elected before July 1, 1995,
with at least five years of service, receives during his or her
lifetime after retirement an amount equal to the annual retainer
currently paid to nonemployee directors. Under the 1995 Plan, a
nonemployee director elected on or after July 1, 1995, with
at least five years of service, receives after retirement a
quarterly amount equal to fifty percent of the stated quarterly
retainer in effect at the time of retirement for the period
equal to the directors continuous service. Under either
plan, in the event of a change in control causing
the directors retirement, he or she receives the
retirement payment prorated for any service less than five
years. Directors who join the board on or after January 1,
1999 were not eligible to participate in either plan.
On January 14, 2003, the board of directors adopted
respective amendments to both plans to provide for a voluntary
immediate lump sum cash-out election of the present value of the
accrued pension and deferred benefits to all nonemployee
directors participating under both plans. Under the terms of
both plans, as amended, the lump-sum benefit was payable to the
participants on June 30, 2003. Of the 14 participants,
three elected not to participate in the lump sum benefit. The
aggregate value for participants electing a payout was
approximately $2.3 million. The payout election by the 11
participants means those participants have no further
opportunity for a pension adjustment under either plan for
future changes in Cliffs annual retainer. Mr. Ireland
is the only current active director eligible for a retirement
benefit, which will be paid from the 1984 Plan. There are no
active directors eligible for retirement benefits, and only two
retired directors currently receive benefits under the 1995 Plan.
210
Cliffs has trust agreements with KeyBank National Association
relating to the Directors Plan, the 1984 Plan and the 1995
Plan, in order to fund and pay Cliffs retirement
obligations under these plans.
2007 Director
Compensation Table
The following table, supported by the accompanying footnotes and
narrative, sets forth for fiscal year 2007 all compensation
earned by the individuals who served as Cliffs nonemployee
directors at any time during 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned or
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash ($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)(1)
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
|
|
(d)(3)
|
|
|
(e)(4)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
R. C. Cambre
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
24,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
86,660
|
|
S. M. Cunningham
|
|
|
61,000
|
|
|
|
22,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,393
|
|
B. J. Eldridge
|
|
|
63,500
|
|
|
|
24,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,838
|
|
S. M. Green
|
|
|
22,954
|
|
|
|
15,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,297
|
|
J. D. Ireland III
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
24,660
|
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,856
|
|
F. R. McAllister
|
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
|
24,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
102,660
|
|
R. Phillips
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
29,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,821
|
|
R. K. Riederer
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
29,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,821
|
|
A. Schwartz
|
|
|
61,000
|
|
|
|
24,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
88,660
|
|
J. S. Brinzo(5)
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
384,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,080
|
|
|
|
525,343
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts listed in this column reflect the aggregate cash
dollar value of all earnings in 2007 for annual director
retainers, chairman retainers and meeting fees, whether received
in required retainer shares, voluntary shares, or cash, or a
combination thereof. Unless otherwise noted below, the amounts
indicated were elected to be paid in cash. |
|
|
|
Messrs. Cambre, Eldridge, and Schwartz elected to receive
$32,500, $44,450, and $15,000, respectively, in Cliffs common
shares. Messrs. Cunningham and Green did not meet the
established Director Share Ownership Guidelines and were
required to receive $15,000 and $6,440, respectively, in Cliffs
common shares. Mr. Riederer elected to defer $15,000 in
Cliffs common shares and Mr. Ireland elected to defer
$15,000 in cash pursuant to the Directors Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount recognized
for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007, in accordance with SFAS 123R,
of awards of restricted shares and includes amounts from awards
granted in and prior to 2007. For additional information
specifically regarding Mr. Brinzos stock awards,
refer to Note 11 to Cliffs audited financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and
Notes 11 and 12 to Cliffs audited financial
statements in Item 8 of Cliffs Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. In 2007, an automatic annual equity grant of 936
restricted shares having a grant date fair market value of
$32,474.52 was made to each of the nonemployee directors listed
above. Mr. Riederer elected to receive deferred shares in
lieu of restricted shares under the Directors Plan. |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, the aggregate number of restricted
shares subject to forfeiture held by each Nonemployee Director
were as follows: Mr. Cambre 3,976;
Ms. Cunningham 3,372;
Mr. Eldridge 3,916; Ms. Green
936, Mr. Ireland 3,976;
Mr. McAllister 3,976;
Mr. Phillips 3,976;
Mr. Riederer 1,732; and
Mr. Schwartz 3,976. |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, the aggregate number of unvested
deferred shares credited to Mr. Riederer under the
Directors Plan was 2,266.5498. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Ireland is the only independent director eligible for
retirement benefits under the 1984 Plan. The aggregate change in
the actuarial present value of Mr. Irelands benefit
under the 1984 Plan is $1,196. |
211
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The amounts in this column, except as noted, reflect matching
contributions made to educational institutions from the Cliffs
Foundation on behalf of the director. |
|
|
|
The Company donated $5,000 to the Boy Scouts Jamboree on behalf
of Mr. McAllister who was the Chairman of the Relationship
and Media Team for the U.S. contingent to the World Scout
Jamboree in 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Brinzo retired as Chairman of the board on May 8,
2007. As former Chief Executive Officer of Cliffs,
Mr. Brinzo was not an independent director. The amount of
cash compensation received in 2007 was paid pursuant to a
compensation package approved by the Compensation Committee on
August 17, 2006. |
|
|
|
Mr. Brinzo received performance share grants as a Cliffs
officer for performance periods 2005 to 2007 and 2006 to 2008.
The amount listed of $348,263 is the SFAS 123R calculation
of the value of outstanding performance shares and retention
units for Mr. Brinzos service as a director. |
|
|
|
Pursuant to Mr. Brinzos retirement agreement, he
received $8,080 in investment counseling services and
secretarial support valued at $3,000. Also, in connection with
Mr. Brinzos retirement, Cliffs established a $5,000
annual scholarship in the name of Mr. Brinzo to one
recipient entering his or her freshman year at Kent State
Universitys College of Business. Cliffs created this
scholarship to honor Mr. Brinzo for his leadership of
Cliffs and his dedication to education. |
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the
following equity compensation plans as of December 31,
2007: the 1992 Incentive Equity Plan, the 2007 Incentive Equity
Plan, the Management Performance Incentive Plan, the Executive
Management Performance Incentive Plan and the Mine Performance
Bonus Plan, which Cliffs refers to as the Mine Plan, the VNQDC
Plan and the Directors Plan. Only the 1992 Incentive
Equity Plan, the 2007 Incentive Equity Plan, the Directors
Plan and the Executive Management Performance Incentive Plan
have been approved by shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
be Issued Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column(a))
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
735,344
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
5.42
|
|
|
|
2,000,878
|
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
735,344
|
|
|
$
|
5.42
|
|
|
|
2,000,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 723,544 performance share awards, an award initially
denominated in shares, but no shares are actually issued until
performance targets are met. The weighted-average exercise price
of outstanding options, warrants and rights, column (b), does
not take these awards into account. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 1,842,306 common shares remaining available under the
2007 Incentive Equity Plan, which authorizes the Compensation
Committee to make awards of option rights, restricted shares,
deferred shares, performance shares and performance units
(including up to 514,714 restricted shares and deferred shares);
and 158,572 common shares remaining available under the
Directors Plan, which authorizes the award of restricted
shares, which we refer to as the annual equity grant, to
directors upon their election or re-election to the board at the
annual meeting and provides (i) that the directors are
required to take $15,000 of the annual retainer in common shares
unless they meet the director share ownership guidelines, and
(ii) may take up to 100 percent of their retainer and
other fees in common shares. |
|
(3) |
|
The Management Performance Incentive Plan, the Mine Plan, and
the VNQDC Plan provide for the issuance of common shares, but do
not provide for a specific amount available under the plans.
Descriptions of those plans are set forth either above or below. |
212
Management
Performance Incentive Plan
The Management Performance Incentive Plan provides an
opportunity for elected officers and other management employees
to earn annual cash bonuses. Bonuses may also be paid in common
shares. Certain participants in the Management Performance
Incentive Plan may elect to defer all or a portion of such bonus
into the VNQDC Plan. Each year the participants under the
Management Performance Incentive Plan must make their cash bonus
deferral election by December 31 of the year prior to the year
in which the bonus is earned. A further election to exchange
this bonus into shares may be made before payment of the bonus
at a time selected by the Chief Executive Officer. Cliffs refers
to these exchanged shares as bonus exchange shares. These
participants may also elect at this time to have dividends
credited with respect to the bonus exchange shares, either
credited in additional deferred common shares, deferred in cash
or paid out in cash in an in-service compensation distribution.
In order to encourage elections to be credited with deferred
common shares, the participants in the Management Performance
Incentive Plan, who elect to have their cash bonuses credited to
an account with bonus exchange shares, will be credited with
restricted deferred common shares in the amount of
25 percent of the bonus exchange shares, referred to as
bonus match shares. These participants must comply with the
employment and non-distribution requirements for the bonus
exchange shares during a five-year period for the bonus match
shares to become vested and nonforfeitable.
Mine
Plan
The Mine Plan provides an opportunity for senior mine managers
to earn cash bonuses. Bonuses earned under the Mine Plan are
determined and paid quarterly to the participants. Certain
participants may elect to defer all or part of their quarterly
cash bonuses under the VNQDC Plan. Participants in the Mine Plan
may further elect to have his or her deferred cash bonus
credited to an account with deferred common shares. Each year
participants under the Mine Plan must make their bonus exchange
shares election (for the four quarters of that year). Such
elections must be made by December 31 of the year prior to the
year in which the quarterly bonuses are earned. As with the
participants electing bonus exchange shares under the Management
Performance Incentive Plan, participants under the Mine Plan
electing bonus exchange shares will receive or be credited with
restricted bonus match shares in an amount of 25 percent of
the bonus exchange shares with the same five-year vesting period.
VNQDC
Plan
The VNQDC Plan, was originally adopted by the Cliffs board of
directors to provide certain key management and highly
compensated employees of Cliffs or its selected affiliates with
the opportunity to defer receipt of a portion of their regular
compensation in order to defer taxation of these amounts. The
VNQDC Plan also permits deferral of bonus awards under the
Management Performance Incentive Plan, the Executive Management
Performance Incentive Plan, the Mine Performance Bonus Plan, or
Mine Plan, and performance shares (awarded under the 1992
Incentive Equity Plan and 2007 Incentive Equity Plan). In
addition, the VNQDC Plan contains the Management Share
Acquisition Program, whose purpose is to provide designated
management employees with the opportunity to acquire deferred
interests in common shares through deferral of their bonuses.
The VNQDC Plan also contains the Officer Share Acquisition
Program, which permits elected officers who have not met the
requirements of Cliffs Share Ownership Guidelines, to
acquire deferred interests in common shares with compensation
previously deferred in cash under the VNQDC Plan. When
participants in the Management Performance Incentive Plan, the
Mine Plan or the Management Share Acquisition Program or Officer
Share Acquisition Program elect to have accounts credited with
deferred common shares under the VNQDC Plan, they receive a
match equal to 25 percent of the value of the deferred
common shares that is credited by Cliffs to the accounts of
participants.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the individuals who served as members of the Cliffs
Compensation Committee in 2007 was or has been an officer or
employee of Cliffs or engaged in transactions with Cliffs (other
than in his or her capacity as a director of Cliffs). None of
Cliffs executive officers serves as a director or member
of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose
executive officers serves as a member of the Compensation
Committee or a Cliffs director.
213
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Other than Mr. Carrabba, who is Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Cliffs, none of the current directors
of Cliffs has any material relationship with Cliffs (directly or
as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has
a relationship with Cliffs). Each of the current directors of
Cliffs (other than Mr. Carrabba) is independent within
Cliffs director independence standards, which include
exactly the NYSE director independence standards, as currently
in effect and as they may be changed from time to time.
Since January 1, 2007, there have been no transactions
between Cliffs and any of its independent directors other than
compensation for service as a director.
Cliffs has entered into indemnification agreements with each
current member of the Cliffs board of directors. The form and
execution of the indemnification agreements were approved by
Cliffs shareholders at the annual meeting convened on
April 29, 1987. The indemnification agreements essentially
provide that, to the extent permitted by the Ohio General
Corporation Law, Cliffs will indemnify the indemnitee against
all expenses, costs, liabilities and losses (including
attorneys fees, judgments, fines or settlements) incurred
or suffered by the indemnitee in connection with any suit in
which the indemnitee is a party or otherwise involved as a
result of his or her service as a member of the Board. In
connection with the indemnification agreements, Cliffs has a
trust agreement with KeyBank National Association pursuant to
which the parties to the indemnification agreements may be
reimbursed with respect to enforcing their respective rights
under the indemnification agreements.
Cliffs and the USW reached an agreement in 2004 on a process
under which the USW may designate a member of the board of
directors provided that the individual is acceptable to the
Chairman, is recommended by the Board Affairs Committee of the
board of directors, and is elected by the full board. The
designee would be subject to (i) annual nomination by
Cliffs, (ii) election by vote of the Cliffs shareholders,
and (iii) all laws and Cliffs policies applicable to the
board of directors. This arrangement was renewed in September
2008 under a new labor agreement with the USW. The new labor
agreement replaced the previous labor agreement that expired on
September 1, 2008. Susan M. Green was proposed by the USW
and first elected to the full board of directors at the annual
meeting in 2007.
Jones Day is a law firm that Cliffs has retained for specific
legal services, on a
case-by-case
basis, for over thirty years. The fees paid by Cliffs to Jones
Day during 2007 were approximately $1.98 million, which
amount is less than 1.0 percent of Jones Days gross
revenues for 2007. Mr. Gunning is the
father-in-law
of Gina K. Gunning, a partner of Jones Day. During 2007,
Ms. Gunning did not personally render legal services to
Cliffs or supervise any attorney in the rendering of legal
services to Cliffs, and Ms. Gunning did not receive any
direct compensation from fees paid by Cliffs to Jones Day.
In 2007, Cliffs pledged $1.25 million over five years to
build infrastructure to connect the William G. Mather Steamship
Museum, also known as the Mather Museum, and the Great Lakes
Science Center in Cleveland, Ohio. The Mather was Cliffs
flagship for many years. The purpose of the donation is to
preserve Cliffs history in the City of Cleveland. It will
also make the Mather Museum a year round attraction.
Mr. Brinzo, Cliffs former Chairman, President and
CEO, was Chairman of the Great Lakes Science Center from
2004-2006.
Mr. Ireland is a member of the Mather Museums Board
of Trustees.
Cliffs recognizes that transactions between Cliffs and any of
its directors or executive officers can present potential or
actual conflicts of interest and create the appearance that its
decisions are based on considerations other than the best
interests of Cliffs shareholders. Pursuant to its charter, the
Audit Committee reviews and approves all related-party
transactions, defined as those transactions required to be
disclosed under Item 404 of
Regulation S-K.
DESCRIPTION
OF CLIFFS CAPITAL STOCK
The following is a summary of the terms and provisions of
Cliffs capital stock. The rights of Cliffs shareholders
are governed by the Ohio General Corporation Law, Cliffs
amended articles of incorporation and regulations. This summary
is qualified by reference to the governing corporate instruments
of Cliffs to which we have referred you and applicable
provisions of Ohio law. To obtain a copy of Cliffs amended
articles of incorporation and regulations, see Where You
Can Find More Information beginning on page 239.
214
Cliffs
Common Shares
General
Cliffs has authorized 224,000,000 common shares, par value
$0.125 per share. The holders of Cliffs common shares are
entitled to one vote for each share on all matters upon which
shareholders have the right to vote and, upon proper notice, are
entitled to cumulative voting rights in the election of
directors. Cliffs common shares do not have any preemptive
rights, are not subject to redemption and do not have the
benefit of any sinking fund.
Holders of Cliffs common shares are entitled to receive such
dividends as Cliffs directors from time to time may declare out
of funds legally available therefore. Entitlement to dividends
is subject to the preferences granted to other classes of
securities Cliffs has or may have outstanding in the future. In
the event of liquidation of Cliffs, holders of Cliffs common
shares are entitled to share in any assets of Cliffs remaining
after satisfaction in full of its liabilities and satisfaction
of such dividend and liquidation preferences as may be possessed
by the holders of other classes of securities Cliffs has or may
have outstanding in the future.
Cliffs common shares are listed on the NYSE under the symbol
CLF.
The transfer agent and registrar for the Cliffs common shares is
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
Shareholder
Rights Plan
On October 8, 2008, the directors of Cliffs authorized and
declared a dividend consisting of one right for each Cliffs
common share outstanding as of the close of business on
October 29, 2008, or the rights record date. Each right
initially represents the right to purchase one one-hundredth of
one Cliffs common share at an exercise price per right of $175,
on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the
Rights Agreement dated as of October 13, 2008, by and
between Cliffs and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as
rights agent, or the rights agreement. The rights agreement also
provides, subject to specified exceptions and limitations, that
each Cliffs common share issued or delivered by Cliffs (whether
originally issued or delivered from Cliffs treasury) after
the rights record date will be entitled to and accompanied by
one right. In the absence of further action by Cliffs directors,
the rights generally will become exercisable upon the occurrence
of certain triggering events, including the acquisition by a
person or a group of beneficial ownership (as such term is
defined in the rights agreement and includes, among other
things, certain derivative or synthetic arrangements having
characteristics of a long position in Cliffs common shares) of
10% or more of Cliffs outstanding common shares, or, in the case
of a person or a group that currently beneficially owns 10% or
more of Cliffs outstanding common shares, the acquisition by
such person or group of beneficial ownership of any additional
common shares of Cliffs (whether or not such person or group has
disposed of beneficial ownership of any Cliffs common shares on
or after the date of the rights agreement). Cliffs is entitled
to redeem all (but not less than all) of the rights at a
redemption price of $0.001 per right at any time prior to the
time the rights become exercisable. Cliffs is also entitled to
exchange the rights for Cliffs common shares after the rights
become exercisable, in which case Cliffs would issue one common
share for each right, subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances. The rights will expire on October 29, 2011,
unless earlier redeemed or exchanged by Cliffs in accordance
with the rights agreement.
After the date the rights become exercisable, if a person or
group acquires or has already acquired a percentage of Cliffs
common shares in excess of the relevant threshold, all holders
of rights (except such person or group that acquires or has
already acquired a percentage of Cliffs common shares in excess
of the relevant threshold) may exercise their rights upon
payment of the purchase price to purchase a number of Cliffs
common shares (or other securities or assets as determined by
Cliffs directors) having a market value of two times the
purchase price of the rights. Cliffs refers to the event
described in the immediately preceding sentence as a flip-in
event. After the date the rights become exercisable, if a
flip-in event has already occurred and Cliffs is acquired in a
merger or similar transaction, all holders of rights (except
such persons and groups that acquire or have already acquired a
percentage of Cliffs common shares in excess of the relevant
threshold) may exercise their rights upon payment of the
purchase price, to purchase shares of the acquiring corporation
with a market value of two times the purchase price of the
rights.
215
Ohio
Control Share Acquisition Statute
The Ohio Control Share Acquisition Statute requires the prior
authorization of the shareholders of certain corporations in
order for any person to acquire, either directly or indirectly,
shares of that corporation that would entitle the acquiring
person to exercise or direct the exercise of 20 percent or
more of the voting power of that corporation in the election of
directors or to exceed specified other percentages of voting
power. In the event an acquiring person proposes to make such an
acquisition, the person is required to deliver to the
corporation a statement disclosing, among other things, the
number of shares owned, directly or indirectly, by the person,
the range of voting power that may result from the proposed
acquisition and the identity of the acquiring person. Within
10 days after receipt of this statement, the corporation
must call a special meeting of shareholders to vote on the
proposed acquisition. The acquiring person may complete the
proposed acquisition only if the acquisition is approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the
voting power of all shares entitled to vote in the election of
directors represented at the meeting excluding the voting power
of all interested shares. Interested shares include
any shares held by the acquiring person and those held by
officers and directors of the corporation as well as by certain
others, including many holders commonly characterized as
arbitrageurs. The Ohio Control Share Acquisition Statute does
not apply to a corporation if its articles of incorporation or
code of regulations state that the statute does not apply to a
corporation. Neither the Cliffs amended articles of
incorporation nor its regulations contain a provision opting out
of this statute.
Ohio
Interested Shareholder Statute
Chapter 1704 of the Ohio Revised Code prohibits certain
corporations from engaging in a chapter 1704
transaction with an interested shareholder for
a period of three years after the date of the transaction in
which the person became an interested shareholder, unless, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the articles of incorporation expressly provide that the
corporation is not subject to the statute (Cliffs has not made
this election); or
|
|
|
|
the board of directors of the corporation approves the
chapter 1704 transaction or the acquisition of the shares
before the date the shares were acquired.
|
After the three-year moratorium period, the corporation may not
consummate a chapter 1704 transaction unless, among other
things, it is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of
at least two-thirds of the voting power in the election of
directors and the holders of a majority of the voting shares,
excluding all shares beneficially owned by an interested
shareholder or an affiliate or associate of an interested
shareholder, or the shareholders receive certain minimum
consideration for their shares. A chapter 1704 transaction
includes certain mergers, sales of assets, consolidations,
combinations and majority share acquisitions involving an
interested shareholder. An interested shareholder is defined to
include, with limited exceptions, any person who, together with
affiliates and associates, is the beneficial owner of a
sufficient number of shares of the corporation to entitle the
person, directly or indirectly, alone or with others, to
exercise or direct the exercise of 10 percent or more of
the voting power in the election of directors after taking into
account all of the persons beneficially owned shares that
are not then outstanding.
Preferred
Stock
The Cliffs board of directors can, without approval of
shareholders, issue one or more series of preferred stock. The
board can determine the number of shares of each series and the
rights, preferences and limitations of each series, including
dividend rights, voting rights, conversion rights, redemption
rights and any liquidation preferences and the terms and
conditions of issue. In some cases, the issuance of preferred
shares could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of
Cliffs and make it harder to remove present management, without
further action by Cliffs shareholders. Under some circumstances,
preferred shares could also decrease the amount of earnings and
assets available for distribution to holders of Cliffs common
shares if Cliffs liquidates or dissolves and could also restrict
or limit dividend payments to holders of Cliffs common shares.
On July 16, 2008, 19,350 shares of
Series A-2
preferred stock of Cliffs were converted to 2,574,800 Cliffs
common shares (total common shares of Cliffs are being issued
out of treasury) at a conversion rate of 133.0646,
216
reducing the number of outstanding shares of
Series A-2
preferred stock to 205 with a redemption value of
$2.8 million on that date. Cliffs shares of
Series A-2
preferred stock may be converted into its common shares based on
the applicable conversion rate. As of June 30, 2008, the
conversion rate was 133.0646 common shares of Cliffs for one
share of
Series A-2
preferred stock of Cliffs.
COMPARISON
OF RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
As a result of the merger, in addition to the cash
consideration, Alpha stockholders will be entitled to receive
0.95 of a common share of Cliffs for each share of Alpha common
stock. The rights of holders of Cliffs common shares differ from
the rights of holders of Alpha common stock. These differences
arise in part from the differences between the DGCL and the Ohio
General Corporation Law. Additional differences arise from the
governing instruments of the two companies (in the case of
Alpha, the Alpha certificate of incorporation, which we refer to
as the Alpha certificate of incorporation, and the Alpha bylaws,
which we refer to as the Alpha bylaws, and, in the case of
Cliffs, the amended articles of incorporation and the
regulations). Although it is impractical to compare all of the
aspects in which the DGCL and the Ohio General Corporation Law
and Alphas and Cliffs governing instruments differ
with respect to shareholders rights, the following
discussion summarizes the material differences between them.
All Alpha stockholders and Cliffs shareholders are urged to read
carefully the relevant provisions of the DGCL and the Ohio
General Corporation Law, as well as the Alpha certificate of
incorporation, the Alpha bylaws, the Cliffs amended articles of
incorporation, and the Cliffs regulations, which are available
to Alpha stockholders and Cliffs shareholders upon request. See
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 239.
Material
Differences in Shareholder Rights
Amendment
and Repeal of Bylaws and Regulations
Delaware. The DGCL provides that stockholders
of a corporation, and, when provided for in the certificate of
incorporation, the board of directors of the corporation, have
the power to adopt, amend and repeal the bylaws of a corporation.
Alpha. The Alpha certificate of incorporation
and Alpha bylaws grant the Alpha board of directors the power to
amend and repeal the Alpha bylaws. Amendments to the Alpha
bylaws are otherwise governed in accordance with the DGCL.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
provides that only holders of a majority of the voting power of
a corporation if acting at a meeting of shareholders, or
two-thirds of the voting power of the corporation if acting by
written consent, have the power to adopt, amend and repeal the
code of regulations of a corporation. Under certain
circumstances, a majority vote of disinterested
shares is also required to amend or repeal the code of
regulations of a corporation.
Cliffs. Amendments to the Cliffs regulations
are governed in accordance with the Ohio General Corporation
Law. In contrast to Alpha, the Cliffs board of directors does
not have the power to amend or repeal the Cliffs regulations.
Amendment
of Charter Documents
Delaware. The DGCL requires approval by the
corporations board of directors and holders of a majority
of the voting power of a corporation or, in cases in which class
voting is required, by holders of a majority of the voting power
of such class, in order to amend a corporations
certificate of incorporation, unless otherwise specified in such
corporations certificate of incorporation.
Alpha. Amendments to the Alpha certificate of
incorporation are governed in accordance with the DGCL with the
exception that the affirmative vote of at least 90% of the
combined voting power of all outstanding shares of Alpha common
stock is required to alter, amend, repeal, or adopt any
provision inconsistent with Article XI of the Alpha
certificate of incorporation, which governs certain fiduciary
duties with respect to the conduct of certain affairs of Alpha,
that may involve specified parties that were controlling
stockholders of Alpha at the time of its
217
initial public offering and their affiliates and their
respective officers and directors, and the powers, rights,
duties and liabilities of Alpha and its officers, directors and
stockholders in connection therewith. The provisions of
Article XI ceased to have force or effect when such persons
ceased to own five percent or more of Alpha common stock.
Ohio. According to the Ohio General
Corporation Law, an adoption by shareholders of an amendment to
the articles requires approval by holders of two-thirds of the
voting power of a corporation or, in cases in which class voting
is required, by holders of two-thirds of the voting power of
such class to amend a corporations articles of
incorporation, unless otherwise specified in such
corporations articles of incorporation. Pursuant to
Section 1701.70(B) of the Ohio General Corporation Law, in
certain circumstances, an amendment to a corporations
articles of incorporation may be adopted by the
corporations directors. For instance, pursuant to
Section 1701.70(B)(6) of the Ohio General Corporation Law,
unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, the
directors may adopt any amendment changing the name of the
corporation.
Cliffs. Amendments to the Cliffs articles of
incorporation are governed in accordance with the Ohio General
Corporation Law.
Cumulative
Voting
Delaware. The DGCL provides that stockholders
of a corporation do not have the right to cumulate their votes
in the election of directors unless such right is granted in the
certificate of incorporation of the corporation.
Alpha. The Alpha certificate of incorporation
does not grant Alpha stockholders the right to vote cumulatively
in the election of directors.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
provides that each shareholder of a corporation has the right to
vote cumulatively in the election of directors if certain notice
requirements are satisfied unless the articles of incorporation
of a corporation are amended to eliminate cumulative voting for
directors.
Cliffs. Neither the Cliffs articles of
incorporation nor the Cliffs regulations eliminate the right of
Cliffs shareholders to vote cumulatively in the election of
directors.
Removal
of Directors
Delaware. The DGCL provides that a director or
directors may be removed from office, with or without cause, by
the holders of a majority of the voting power of a corporation,
except that (i) in the case of a corporation that has a
classified board, directors may be removed from office only for
cause, unless the certificate of incorporation provides
otherwise and (ii) in the case of a corporation having
cumulative voting, if less than the entire board is to be
removed, no director may be removed without cause if the votes
cast against such removal would be sufficient to elect such
director if then cumulatively voted at an election of the entire
board of directors or of the class of directors of which the
director is a part.
Alpha. In accordance with the DGCL, the Alpha
bylaws provide that a director may be removed with or without
cause.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
provides that a director may be removed from office by the board
of directors if (i) such director has been found to be of
unsound mind by an order of court, (ii) such director is
adjudicated bankrupt, or (iii) such director fails to meet
any qualifications for office. The Ohio General Corporation Law
further provides that a director may be removed from office,
with or without cause, by the holders of a majority of the
voting power of a corporation, except that, in the case of a
corporation having cumulative voting, if less than the entire
board is to be removed, no director may be removed without cause
if the votes cast against such removal would be sufficient to
elect such director if then cumulatively voted at an election of
the entire board of directors or of the class of directors of
which the director is a part, unless the articles of
incorporation provides otherwise. Directors serving on a
classified board may only be removed for cause.
Cliffs. The removal of Cliffs directors is
governed in accordance with the Ohio General Corporation Law. In
contrast to Alpha, a Cliffs director may be removed by the board
of directors.
218
Vacancies
on the Board
Delaware. The DGCL provides that vacancies and
newly created directorships resulting from a resignation or any
increase in the authorized number of directors to be elected by
the stockholders having the right to vote as a single class may
be filled by a majority of the directors then in office or by a
sole remaining director, unless the certificate of incorporation
or the bylaws of a corporation provide otherwise.
Alpha. Vacancies on Alphas board of
directors are governed in accordance with the DGCL.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
provides that vacancies on a corporations board of
directors may be filled by a majority of the remaining directors
of the corporation unless the governing documents of the
corporation provide otherwise.
Cliffs. The Cliffs regulations provide that
vacancies on the Cliffs board of directors are governed in
accordance with the Ohio General Corporation Law.
Right
to Call Special Meetings of Shareholders
Delaware. The DGCL permits special meetings of
stockholders to be called by the board of directors and such
other persons, including stockholders, as the certificate of
incorporation or bylaws may provide. The DGCL does not require
that stockholders be given the right to call special meetings.
Alpha. The Alpha bylaws provide that, unless
otherwise prescribed by the DGCL, special meetings may be called
by the chairman of the Alpha board of directors, the chief
executive officer or by resolution of the board of directors and
shall be called by the chief executive officer or secretary upon
the written request of not less than 10% of the stockholders in
interest entitled to vote thereat.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
provides that (i) the chairperson of the board, the
president or, in case of the presidents death or
disability, the vice president authorized to exercise the
authority of the president, (ii) the directors by action at
a meeting or a majority of the directors acting without a
meeting, or (iii) holders of at least 25% of the
outstanding voting shares of a corporation, unless the
corporations articles or regulations specifies another
percentage for such purpose (which may not be greater than 50%),
have the authority to call special meetings of shareholders.
Cliffs. In contrast to Alpha, according to the
Cliffs regulations, special meetings may be called by
(1) the chairman, president, or a vice-president,
(2) by the directors by action at a meeting or by three or
more directors acting without a meeting, or (3) by the
person or persons who hold at least 25% of all shares
outstanding and entitled to be voted on any proposal to be
subjected at said meeting. The right to call special meetings of
shareholders is otherwise governed in accordance with the Ohio
General Corporation Law.
Shareholder
Action Without a Meeting
Delaware. The DGCL provides that any action
that may be taken at a meeting of stockholders may be taken
without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if
the holders of the outstanding stock having not less than the
minimum number of votes otherwise required to authorize or take
such action at a meeting of stockholders consent in writing,
unless otherwise provided by a corporations certificate of
incorporation. The record date to determine the stockholders
entitled to consent to corporate action in writing is the date
of first submission of the written consent to the corporation.
Alpha. Actions by Alpha stockholders without a
meeting are governed in accordance with the DGCL, except that
the Alpha bylaws provide for the following procedure for the
board of directors of Alpha to set the record date for
stockholder action by written consent: any person seeking to
have the Alpha stockholders authorize or take corporate action
by written consent without a meeting shall request the Alpha
board of directors to fix the record date by sending to the
corporate secretary a written notice describing the action that
the stockholder proposes to take by consent and providing some
further information described in the Alpha bylaws. The board of
directors will then have 10 days from receipt of such
written notice to determine the validity of the request and
adopt a resolution fixing the record date, which record date
shall not be more than 10 days from the date of the board
resolution. If the board
219
of directors fails within 10 days to fix a record date,
then the record date shall be the day on which the first written
consent is delivered to the corporation.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
provides that, except to the extent prohibited in the articles
or regulations, any action that may be authorized or taken by
shareholders of a corporation at a meeting of shareholders may
be authorized or taken without a meeting with the unanimous
written consent of all shareholders entitled to vote at such
meeting.
Cliffs. Actions by Cliffs shareholders without
a meeting are governed in accordance with the Ohio General
Corporation Law. In contrast to Alpha stockholders, Cliffs
shareholders may only take action without a meeting by unanimous
written consent (however, Cliffs shareholders may amend the
Cliffs regulations to permit action by less than unanimous
written consent upon the approval of at least two-thirds of the
outstanding shares).
Provisions
Affecting Control Share Acquisitions and Business
Combinations
Delaware. Section 203 of the DGCL
provides generally that any person who acquires 15% or more of a
corporations voting stock (thereby becoming an
interested stockholder) may not engage in a wide
range of business combinations with the corporation
for a period of three years following the time the person became
an interested stockholder, unless (1) the board of
directors of the corporation has approved, prior to that
acquisition time, either the business combination or the
transaction that resulted in the person becoming an interested
stockholder, (2) upon consummation of the transaction that
resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder, that
person owned at least 85% of the corporations voting stock
outstanding at the time the transaction commenced (excluding
shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers and
shares owned by employee stock plans in which participants do
not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares
will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer), or (3) on
or after the date the stockholder became an interested
stockholder, the business combination is approved by the board
of directors and authorized by the affirmative vote (at an
annual or special meeting and not by written consent) of at
least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested
stockholder.
These restrictions on interested stockholders do not apply under
certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, the
following: (1) if the corporations original
certificate of incorporation contains a provision expressly
electing not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL, or
(2) if the corporation, by action of its stockholders taken
with the favorable vote of a majority of the outstanding voting
power of the corporation, adopts an amendment to its bylaws or
certificate of incorporation expressly electing not to be
governed by Section 203 of the DGCL, with such amendment to
be effective 12 months thereafter.
Alpha. The Alpha certificate of incorporation
specifically provides that Alpha is exempted from
Section 203 of the DGCL.
Ohio. Chapter 1704 of the Ohio Revised
Code prohibits an interested shareholder from engaging in a wide
range of business combinations similar to those prohibited by
Section 203 of the DGCL. However, in contrast to
Section 203 of the DGCL, under Chapter 1704 of the
Ohio Revised Code, an interested shareholder
includes a shareholder who, directly or indirectly, exercises or
directs the exercise of 10% or more of the voting power of the
corporation. Chapter 1704 restrictions do not apply under
certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, the
following: (1) if, prior to the interested
shareholders share acquisition date, the directors of a
corporation have approved the transaction or the purchase of
shares on the share acquisition date, and (2) if a
corporation, by action of its shareholders holding at least
two-thirds of the voting power of the corporation, adopts an
amendment to its articles of incorporation specifying that
Chapter 1704 of the Ohio Revised Code shall not be
applicable to the corporation.
Under the Ohio Control Share Acquisition Statute , unless the
articles of incorporation or code of regulations of a
corporation otherwise provide, any control share acquisition of
an issuing public corporation can only be made with the prior
approval of the shareholders of the corporation. A control
share acquisition is defined as any acquisition of shares
of a corporation that, when added to all other shares of that
corporation owned by the acquiring person, would enable a person
to exercise levels of voting power in any of the following
ranges: at least 20% but less than
331/3%;
at least
331/3%
but less than 50%; 50% or more.
220
Cliffs. Neither the Cliffs articles of
incorporation nor the Cliffs regulations contain a provision
that exempts Cliffs from Chapter 1704 of the Ohio Revised
Code or the Ohio Control Share Acquisition Statute.
Rights
of Dissenting Shareholders
Delaware. The DGCL provides that appraisal
rights are available to dissenting stockholders in connection
with certain mergers or consolidations. However, unless a
corporations certificate of incorporation otherwise
provides, the DGCL does not provide for appraisal rights if
(1) the shares of the corporation are (x) listed on a
national securities exchange or (y) held of record by more
than 2,000 stockholders or (2) the corporation is the
surviving corporation and no vote of its stockholders is
required for the merger. However, notwithstanding the foregoing,
the DGCL provides that appraisal rights will be available to the
stockholders of a corporation if the stockholders are required
by the terms of a merger agreement to accept for such stock
anything except (1) shares of stock of the corporation
surviving or resulting from such merger or consolidation, or
depository receipts in respect thereof, (2) shares of stock
of any other corporation, or depository receipts in respect
thereof, which shares of stock (or depository receipts in
respect thereof) or depository receipts at the effective date of
the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national
securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000
holders, (3) cash in lieu of fractional shares or
fractional depository receipts as described above, or
(4) any combination of the shares of stock, depository
receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts as described above. See
Summary Appraisal Rights of Alpha
Stockholders beginning on page 11 and The
Merger Appraisal Rights of Alpha Stockholders
beginning on page 87. The DGCL does not provide appraisal
rights to stockholders with respect to the sale of all or
substantially all of a corporations assets or an amendment
to a corporations certificate of incorporation, although a
corporations certificate of incorporation may so provide.
The DGCL provides, among other procedural requirements for the
exercise of the appraisal rights, that a shareholders
written demand for appraisal of shares must be received before
the taking of the vote on the matter giving rise to appraisal
rights, when the matter is voted on at a meeting of
stockholders. See Annex D for the full text of
Section 262 of the DGCL governing the rights of appraisal.
Alpha. The appraisal rights of Alpha
stockholders are governed in accordance with the DGCL.
Ohio. Under the Ohio General Corporation Law,
dissenting shareholders are entitled to dissenters rights
in connection with certain amendments to a corporations
articles of incorporation and the lease, sale, exchange,
transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the
assets of a corporation. Shareholders of an Ohio corporation
being merged into or consolidated with another corporation are
also entitled to dissenters rights. In addition,
shareholders of an acquiring corporation are entitled to
dissenters rights in any merger, combination or
majority share acquisition in which such
shareholders are entitled to voting rights. The Ohio General
Corporation Law provides shareholders of an acquiring
corporation with voting rights, and corresponding
dissenters rights, if the acquisition involves the
transfer of shares of the acquiring corporation entitling the
recipients thereof to exercise one sixth or more of the voting
power of such acquiring corporation immediately after the
consummation of the transaction.
The Ohio General Corporation Law provides that a
shareholders written demand must be delivered to a
corporation not later than ten days after the taking of the vote
on the matter giving rise to dissenters rights. See
Annex E for the full text of Section 1701.85 of
the Ohio General Corporation Law governing dissenters
rights. See also Summary Dissenters Rights of
Cliffs Shareholders on page 12 and The
Merger Dissenters Rights of Cliffs
Shareholders beginning on page 90.
Cliffs. The dissenters rights of Cliffs
shareholders are governed in accordance with the Ohio General
Corporation Law.
Director
Liability and Indemnification
Delaware. The DGCL allows a corporation to
include in its certificate of incorporation a provision
eliminating the liability of a director for monetary damages for
a breach of such directors fiduciary duties as a director,
except liability (1) for any breach of the directors
duty of loyalty to the corporation or the corporations
stockholders, (2) for acts or omissions not in good faith
or that involve intentional misconduct or knowing violation of
law, (3) under Section 174 of
221
the DGCL (which deals generally with unlawful payments of
dividends, stock repurchases and redemptions), and (4) for
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
The DGCL permits a Delaware corporation to indemnify directors,
officers, employees and agents (or any person serving, at the
request of the corporation, as director or officer of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise) under certain circumstances, and mandates
indemnification under certain circumstances. The DGCL permits a
corporation to indemnify an officer, director, employee or agent
for fines, judgments, or settlements, as well as for expenses in
the context of actions other than derivative actions, if such
person acted in good faith and in a manner such person
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation and, in the case of a criminal
proceeding, if such person had no reasonable cause to believe
that such persons conduct was unlawful. Indemnification
against expenses incurred by a director, officer, employee or
agent in connection with a proceeding against such person for
actions in such capacity is mandatory to the extent that such
person has been successful on the merits. If a director,
officer, employee or agent is determined to be liable to the
corporation, indemnification for expenses is not allowable in
derivative actions, subject to limited exceptions when a court
deems the award of expenses appropriate.
The DGCL grants express power to a Delaware corporation to
purchase liability insurance for its directors, officers,
employees and agents, regardless of whether any such person is
otherwise eligible for indemnification by the corporation.
Advancement of expenses is permitted, but a director or officer
receiving such advances must agree to repay those expenses if it
is ultimately determined that he is not entitled to
indemnification.
Alpha. The Alpha certificate of incorporation
contains a provision pursuant to which Alpha directors,
officers, employees, and agents, and persons serving at the
request of Alpha as a director, officer, employee, or agent of
another corporation shall be indemnified to the fullest extent
permitted by the DGCL. The Alpha certificate of incorporation
also contains a provision excluding the personal liability of a
director to Alpha or its stockholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty as a director to the fullest extent
permitted by the DGCL. In addition to the provisions of the
Alpha certificate of incorporation, the Alpha bylaws generally
provide indemnification to Alphas directors and officers,
and persons serving at the request of Alpha as a director,
officer, or trustee of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust, or other enterprise, to the fullest extent
provided by the DGCL. The Alpha bylaws also allow Alpha to
purchase and maintain liability insurance for its directors,
officers, employees and agents, regardless of whether any such
person is otherwise eligible for indemnification by the
corporation, and provide for the advancement of expenses.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
provides no comparable provision limiting the liability of
officers, employees or agents of a corporation. However, unless
a corporations articles of incorporation or code of
regulations expressly states that such provision of the Ohio
General Corporation Law is not applicable, a director is not
liable for monetary damages unless it is proved by clear and
convincing evidence that such directors action or failure
to act was undertaken with deliberate intent to cause injury to
the corporation or with reckless disregard for the best
interests of the corporation, although such provision does not
limit a directors liability for the approval of unlawful
loans, dividends or distributions of assets.
The Ohio General Corporation Law provides that a corporation may
indemnify directors, officers, employees and agents within
prescribed limits, and must indemnify them under certain
circumstances. The Ohio General Corporation Law does not
authorize payment by a corporation of judgments against a
director, officer, employee or agent after a finding of
negligence or misconduct in a derivative suit absent a court
order. Indemnification is required, however, to the extent such
person succeeds on the merits. In all other cases, if it is
determined that a director, officer, employee, or agent acted in
good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be
in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation,
indemnification is discretionary, except as otherwise provided
by a corporations articles of incorporation or code of
regulations, or by contract, except with respect to the
advancement of expenses to directors (as discussed in the next
paragraph). The statutory right to indemnification is not
exclusive of Ohio, and Ohio corporations may, among other
things, purchase insurance to indemnify such persons.
The Ohio General Corporation Law provides that a director (but
not an officer, employee, or agent) is entitled to mandatory
advancement of expenses, including attorneys fees,
incurred in defending any action, including derivative actions,
brought against the director, provided that the director agrees
to cooperate with the corporation
222
concerning the matter and to repay the amount advanced if it is
proved by clear and convincing evidence that such
directors act or failure to act was done with deliberate
intent to cause injury to the corporation or with reckless
disregard for the corporations best interests.
Cliffs. The Cliffs regulations provide for
indemnification of Cliffs directors, officers, employees, and
agents, or persons serving at the request of Cliffs as a
director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation to
the fullest extent permitted by the Ohio General Corporation
Law. The Cliffs regulations also contain a provision limiting
the personal liability of a director to Cliffs or its
shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty
as a director to the fullest extent permitted by the Ohio
General Corporation Law.
Mergers,
Acquisitions, Share Purchases and Certain Other
Transactions
Delaware. The DGCL requires approval of
mergers (other than so-called parent-subsidiary
mergers where the parent company owns at least 90% of the shares
of the subsidiary), consolidations and dispositions of all or
substantially all of a corporations assets by a majority
of the voting power of the corporation, unless the
corporations certificate of incorporation specifies a
different percentage. The DGCL does not require stockholder
approval for (a) majority share acquisitions,
(b) mergers (i) involving the issuance of 20% or less
of the voting power of the corporation, (ii) governed by an
agreement of merger that does not amend in any respect the
certificate of incorporation of the corporation, and
(iii) in which each share of stock of the corporation
outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the
merger remains identical after the effective date of the merger,
or (c) other combinations, except for business combinations
subject to Section 203 of the DGCL.
Alpha. Approval of mergers, acquisitions,
share purchases and certain other transactions is governed in
accordance with the DGCL. Alpha is exempt from Section 203
of the DGCL.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
requires approval of mergers, dissolutions, dispositions of all
or substantially all of a corporations assets, and
majority share acquisitions and combinations involving issuance
of shares representing one-sixth or more of the voting power of
the corporation immediately after the consummation of the
transaction (other than so-called parent-subsidiary
mergers), by two-thirds of the voting power of a corporation,
unless the articles of incorporation specify a different
proportion (but not less than a majority).
Section 1701.59 of the Ohio General Corporation Law permits
a director of a corporation, in determining what such director
reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the
corporation, to consider, in addition to the interests of the
corporations shareholders, any of the following
(1) the interests of the corporations employees,
suppliers, creditors, and customers, (2) the economy of the
state and nation, (3) community and societal
considerations, and (4) the long-term as well as short-term
interests of the corporation and the corporations
shareholders, including the possibility that these interests may
be best served by the continued independence of the corporation.
Cliffs. Approval of mergers, acquisitions,
share purchases and certain other transactions is governed in
accordance with the Ohio General Corporation Law.
Shareholder
Rights Plan
Alpha. Alpha does not have a stockholder
rights plan.
Cliffs. Cliffs has a shareholder rights plan
with a 10% threshold. It is both a flip-in and flip-over plan
and is triggered if a person or group acquires beneficial
ownership of 10% or more of Cliffs outstanding common
shares, or, in the case of a person or a group that currently
beneficially owns 10% or more of Cliffs outstanding common
shares, if such person or group acquires beneficial ownership of
any additional common shares of Cliffs (whether or not such
person or group has disposed of beneficial ownership of any
Cliffs common shares on or after October 13, 2008, the date
of the rights agreement). For further details pertaining to the
Cliffs shareholder rights plan, see Description of Cliffs
Capital Stock Shareholder Rights Plan on
page 215.
223
Certain
Similarities in Shareholder Rights
Public
Markets for the Shares
Common shares of Cliffs and shares of Alpha common stock are
quoted on the NYSE. After the merger, common shares of the
combined company, including those issued in connection with the
merger, will be quoted on the NYSE.
Classification
of Board of Directors
Delaware. The DGCL permits, but does not
require, a classified board of directors, pursuant to which the
directors can be divided into two or three classes with
staggered terms of office, with only one class of directors
standing for election each year.
Alpha. Neither the Alpha certificate of
incorporation nor the Alpha bylaws call for the division of its
board of directors into classes.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
permits, but does not require, a classified board of directors,
pursuant to which the directors can be divided into two or three
classes with staggered terms of office, with terms of office
(which need not be uniform) that do not exceed three years and
which consist of not less than three directors in each class,
subject to certain exceptions.
Cliffs. Neither the Cliffs articles of
incorporation nor the Cliffs regulations call for the division
of its board of directors into classes. The Cliffs articles of
incorporation, however, provide that if, and so often as, Cliffs
is in default of its dividend payments to series A or
series B preferred shareholders in an amount equal to six
full quarterly dividends, whether or not consecutive and whether
or not earned or declared, the affected class of shareholders is
entitled to vote separately as a class in order to elect two
directors in addition to any other directors then in office or
proposed to be elected. The terms of these additional directors
shall immediately terminate and the number of directors reduced
accordingly at such time as the default is remedied pursuant to
the provisions of the Cliffs articles of incorporation.
Class Voting
Delaware. The DGCL provides that the holders
of a particular class of shares are entitled to vote as a
separate class with respect to certain amendments to a
corporations certificate of incorporation, including, but
not limited to, amendments that increase or decrease the
aggregate number of authorized shares of such class, increase or
decrease the par value of shares of such class, or otherwise
adversely affect the holders of such class.
Alpha. The Alpha certificate of incorporation
provides that any increase or decrease in the authorized number
of shares (but not below the number of shares then outstanding)
of any class or classes of stock, or the creation,
authorization, or issuance of any securities convertible into,
or warrants, options, or similar rights to purchase, acquire, or
receive, shares of any such class or classes of stock shall not
be deemed to adversely affect the holders of preferred stock.
Class voting by Alpha stockholders is otherwise governed in
accordance with the DGCL.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
provides that the holders of a particular class of shares are
entitled to vote as a separate class with respect to amendments
to a corporations articles of incorporation, including,
but not limited to, amendments that decrease the aggregate
number of issued shares of such class, increase or decrease the
par value of shares of such class, or are otherwise
substantially prejudicial to the holders of such class.
Cliffs. The Cliffs articles of incorporation
provide that if, and so often as, Cliffs is in default of its
dividend payments to series A or series B preferred
shareholders in an amount equal to six full quarterly dividends
whether or not consecutive and whether or not earned or
declared, the affected class of shareholders is entitled to vote
separately as a class in order to elect two directors in
addition to any other directors then in office or proposed to be
elected.
The Cliffs articles of incorporation provide that the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the
outstanding shares of the respective class of preferred stock
shall be necessary to effect (1) the consolidation or
merger of Cliffs with or into any other corporation to the
extent any such consolidation or merger shall be required,
224
pursuant to the Ohio General Corporation Law, to be approved by
the holders of the respective class of shares of preferred stock
voting separately as a class, or (2) the authorization of
any shares ranking on a parity with the respective class of
preferred shares including an increase in the authorized number
of respective class of preferred shares.
The Cliffs articles of incorporation provide that the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the
outstanding shares of the affected class of preferred stock
shall be necessary to effect (1) any amendment, alteration
or repeal of any of the provisions of the Cliffs articles of
incorporation or regulations which affects adversely the
preferences or voting rights of the holders of either class of
preferred stock, subject to certain qualifications, (2) the
authorization, creation, or increase in the authorized amount of
any shares of any class or any security convertible into shares
of any class, in either case, ranking prior to the affected
class of preferred stock, or (3) the purchase or redemption
of less than all of the affected class of preferred stock the
outstanding, subject to certain qualifications.
Preemptive
Rights of Shareholders
Delaware. The DGCL provides that no
stockholder shall have any preemptive rights to purchase
additional securities of a corporation unless the
corporations certificate of incorporation expressly grants
such rights.
Alpha. The Alpha certificate of incorporation
does not grant any preemptive rights to Alpha stockholders.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
provides that no shareholder shall have any preemptive rights to
purchase additional securities of a corporation unless the
corporations articles of incorporation expressly grant
such rights.
Cliffs. The Cliffs articles of incorporation
do not grant any preemptive rights to Cliffs shareholders.
Dividends
Delaware. The DGCL provides that dividends may
be paid in cash, property or shares of a corporations
capital stock. The DGCL further provides that a corporation may
pay dividends out of any surplus, and, if it has no surplus, out
of any net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend was
declared or for the preceding fiscal year (provided that such
payment out of net profits will not reduce capital below the
amount of capital represented by all classes of shares having a
preference upon the distribution of assets).
Alpha. The Alpha bylaws provide that the board
of directors may declare dividends either out of the Alpha
surplus, or in the case that there is no such surplus, out of
its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is
declared
and/or the
preceding fiscal year. Before the declaration of any dividend,
the board of directors may, at its discretion, set apart, out of
any funds of Alpha available for dividends, such sum or sums as
may be deemed proper for working capital or as a reserve fund to
meet contingencies or such other purposes as shall be deemed
conducive to the interests of Alpha.
Ohio. The Ohio General Corporation Law
provides that dividends may be paid in cash, property or shares
of a corporations capital stock. The Ohio General
Corporation Law further provides that a corporation may pay
dividends out of its surplus and if a dividend is paid out of
capital surplus, the corporation must notify its shareholders as
to the kind of surplus out of which it is paid.
Cliffs. Dividends granted to Cliffs
shareholders are governed in accordance with the Ohio General
Corporation Law. Cliffs has outstanding shares of
Series A-2
preferred stock entitled to a $32.50 dividend per annum.
225
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information is based upon the historical consolidated
financial information of Cliffs, which is included elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and Alpha, which is
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and has been prepared to reflect the
proposed merger involving the companies. The unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated statement of financial position as of
June 30, 2008 is presented as if the merger and related
financing had occurred on that date. The unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2007 and for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 assume that the merger had occurred on
January 1, 2007. The historical consolidated financial
information has been adjusted to give effect to estimated pro
forma events that are (1) directly attributable to the
merger, (2) factually supportable, and (3) with
respect to the statements of operations, expected to have a
continuing impact on the combined results of operations.
Cliffs will account for the merger as a purchase of Alpha by
Cliffs, using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance
with GAAP. Cliffs and Alpha expect that, upon completion of the
merger, Alpha stockholders will receive approximately 37.0% of
the outstanding common shares of the combined company in respect
of their shares of Alpha common stock on a diluted basis and
Cliffs shareholders will retain approximately 63.0% of the
outstanding common shares of the combined company on a diluted
basis. In addition to considering these relative voting rights,
Cliffs also considered the proposed composition of the combined
companys board of directors and the boards
committees, the proposed structure and members of the executive
management team of the combined company, and the premium to be
paid by Cliffs to acquire Alpha in determining the acquirer for
accounting purposes. Based on the weighting of these factors,
Cliffs has concluded that it is the accounting acquirer.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
information should be read in conjunction with the historical
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of
Cliffs, which are included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and Alpha, which are incorporated by
reference from its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and subsequent
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
information has been prepared for illustrative purposes only and
is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated financial
position or results of operations in future periods or the
results that actually would have been realized had Cliffs and
Alpha been a combined company during the specified periods. The
pro forma adjustments are based on the preliminary information
available at the time of the preparation of this document. For
purposes of this unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information, Cliffs has made a preliminary allocation
of the estimated purchase price to the tangible and intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on various
estimates of their fair value. The purchase consideration,
including certain acquisition and closing costs, will be
allocated amongst the relative fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values as of the date of the merger. Any excess of the purchase
price for the merger over the fair value of Alphas net
assets will be recorded as goodwill. The final allocation is
dependent upon certain valuations and other analyses that cannot
be completed prior to the merger and are required to make a
definitive allocation. The actual amounts recorded at the
completion of the merger may differ materially from the
information presented in the accompanying unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial information. Additionally, the
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information
does not reflect the cost of any integration activities or
benefits that may result from synergies that may be derived from
any integration activities, which may be significant.
Certain amounts in the historical consolidated Alpha financial
statements have been reclassified to conform to Cliffs
financial statement presentation. Additionally, Alpha coal
revenues and cost of coal sales for the year ended
December 31, 2007 have been reclassified to exclude changes
in the fair value of coal and diesel fuel derivative contracts
to conform to their 2008 presentation. Such reclassification
adjustments had no effect on historical operating income or net
income for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management
expects that there could be additional reclassifications
following the merger. Additionally, management will continue to
assess Alphas accounting policies for any additional
adjustments that may be required to conform Alphas
accounting policies to those of Cliffs.
226
The preliminary purchase price allocation assumes the merger is
consummated in 2008, and that it will be accounted for under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141,
Business Combinations. Cliffs and Alphas
managements believe that, assuming the requisite approvals of
Alphas stockholders and Cliffs shareholders are
obtained, the merger will be consummated in the fourth quarter
of 2008. If the merger is consummated subsequent to
December 31, 2008, it will be accounted for under Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations, or SFAS 141(R), which is
effective for Cliffs on January 1, 2009. SFAS 141(R)
changes the methodologies for calculating purchase price and for
determining fair values. It also requires that all transaction
and restructuring costs related to business combinations be
expensed as incurred, and it requires that changes in deferred
tax asset valuation allowances and liabilities for tax
uncertainties subsequent to the acquisition date that do not
meet certain remeasurement criteria be recorded in the income
statement among other changes. The consolidated statement of
financial position and results of operations of the combined
company could be materially different if the merger of Cliffs
and Alpha were accounted for under SFAS 141(R).
227
CLIFFS
NATURAL RESOURCES INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION
AS OF
JUNE 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
320.4
|
|
|
$
|
406.5
|
|
|
$
|
(190.5
|
)(c)
|
|
$
|
289.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246.6
|
)(n)
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable net
|
|
|
291.9
|
|
|
|
257.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549.2
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
466.8
|
|
|
|
70.7
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
(d)
|
|
|
574.6
|
|
Supplies and other inventories
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.3
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
157.9
|
|
|
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
124.5
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
270.2
|
(d)(m)
|
|
|
443.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
1,443.1
|
|
|
|
882.4
|
|
|
|
(129.8
|
)
|
|
|
2,195.7
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT NET
|
|
|
2,091.3
|
|
|
|
619.2
|
|
|
|
8,923.8
|
(d)
|
|
|
11,634.3
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in ventures
|
|
|
265.3
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
(d)
|
|
|
313.2
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
102.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102.4
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
|
|
81.5
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138.7
|
)(m)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)(d)
|
|
|
3,943.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
(l)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,924.9
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
102.6
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)(d)
|
|
|
154.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)(l)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
512.5
|
|
|
|
177.3
|
|
|
|
3,823.8
|
|
|
|
4,513.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
4,046.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,678.9
|
|
|
$
|
12,617.8
|
|
|
$
|
18,343.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
172.5
|
|
|
$
|
119.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
292.2
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290.0
|
|
|
$
|
(287.5
|
)(d)
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Accrued employment costs
|
|
|
67.7
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117.8
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
71.2
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91.7
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
103.2
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
State and local taxes payable
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.3
|
|
Environmental and mine closure obligations
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)(d)
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)(d)
|
|
|
96.2
|
|
Below market coal sales contracts acquired-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749.1
|
(d)
|
|
|
749.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
515.3
|
|
|
|
570.5
|
|
|
|
451.5
|
|
|
|
1,537.3
|
|
PENSIONS
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
|
|
114.2
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171.3
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MINE CLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
125.0
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209.3
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
238.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,193.9
|
(d)
|
|
|
3,293.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138.7
|
)(m)
|
|
|
|
|
SENIOR NOTES
|
|
|
325.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325.0
|
|
TERM LOAN
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
|
|
233.1
|
|
|
|
1,900.0
|
(b)
|
|
|
2,111.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(233.1
|
)(n)
|
|
|
|
|
REVOLVING CREDIT
|
|
|
160.0
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
(b)
|
|
|
231.6
|
|
CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
178.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178.5
|
|
DEFERRED PAYMENT
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
|
141.5
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)(n)
|
|
|
177.9
|
|
BELOW MARKET COAL SALES CONTRACTS ACQUIRED-LONG TERM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659.0
|
(d)
|
|
|
659.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
2,196.0
|
|
|
|
1,011.0
|
|
|
|
5,886.5
|
|
|
|
9,093.5
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
187.1
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188.3
|
|
3.25% REDEEMABLE CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE PERPETUAL PREFERRED STOCK
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares par value $0.125 per share
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
(a)
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)(e)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par value of shares
|
|
|
149.6
|
|
|
|
411.2
|
|
|
|
7,330.3
|
(a)
|
|
|
7,538.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(411.2
|
)(e)
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,589.5
|
|
|
|
275.0
|
|
|
|
(275.0
|
)(e)
|
|
|
1,589.5
|
|
Cost of common shares in treasury
|
|
|
(172.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172.5
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)
|
|
|
20.2
|
(e)
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
1,644.2
|
|
|
|
666.7
|
|
|
|
6,731.3
|
|
|
|
9,042.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
4,046.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,678.9
|
|
|
$
|
12,617.8
|
|
|
$
|
18,343.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.
228
CLIFFS
NATURAL RESOURCES INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
REVENUES FROM PRODUCT SALES AND SERVICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
1,333.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,077.5
|
|
|
$
|
347.3
|
(g)
|
|
$
|
2,758.4
|
|
Freight and venture partners cost reimbursements
|
|
|
169.5
|
|
|
|
145.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314.7
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,503.1
|
|
|
|
1,249.1
|
|
|
|
347.3
|
|
|
|
3,099.5
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD AND OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
(994.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1,082.1
|
)
|
|
|
(300.9
|
)(f)
|
|
|
(2,378.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SALES MARGIN
|
|
|
508.8
|
|
|
|
167.0
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
721.4
|
|
OTHER OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casualty recoveries
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Royalties and management fee revenue
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(96.6
|
)
|
|
|
(36.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132.7
|
)
|
Gain on sale of other assets
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
Miscellaneous net
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56.6
|
)
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
452.2
|
|
|
|
154.1
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
651.9
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
(27.2
|
)
|
|
|
26.6
|
(i)
|
|
|
(66.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48.6
|
)(j)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.7
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(38.9
|
)
|
|
|
(22.0
|
)
|
|
|
(65.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES, MINORITY INTEREST AND EQUITY LOSS
FROM VENTURES
|
|
|
447.4
|
|
|
|
115.2
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
586.2
|
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(121.6
|
)
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
|
|
(28.5
|
)(k)
|
|
|
(165.7
|
)
|
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
(25.5
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.3
|
)
|
EQUITY LOSS FROM VENTURES
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
287.2
|
|
|
|
99.8
|
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
382.1
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES
|
|
$
|
285.9
|
|
|
$
|
99.8
|
|
|
$
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
380.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE BASIC
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE DILUTED
|
|
$
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES (IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
94,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,962
|
|
|
|
163,993
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
105,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,508
|
|
|
|
175,595
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.
229
CLIFFS
NATURAL RESOURCES INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
REVENUES FROM PRODUCT SALES AND SERVICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
1,997.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,647.5
|
|
|
$
|
749.1
|
(g)
|
|
$
|
4,393.9
|
|
Freight and venture partners cost reimbursements
|
|
|
277.9
|
|
|
|
205.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483.0
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,275.2
|
|
|
|
1,885.8
|
|
|
|
749.1
|
|
|
|
4,910.1
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD AND OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
(1,813.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,761.9
|
)
|
|
|
(597.9
|
)(f)
|
|
|
(4,174.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SALES MARGIN
|
|
|
462.0
|
|
|
|
123.9
|
|
|
|
150.1
|
|
|
|
736.0
|
|
OTHER OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casualty recoveries
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Royalties and management fee revenue
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(114.2
|
)
|
|
|
(58.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172.8
|
)
|
Gain on sale of other assets
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
Miscellaneous net
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80.4
|
)
|
|
|
(49.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
381.6
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
150.1
|
|
|
|
605.9
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22.6
|
)
|
|
|
(40.2
|
)
|
|
|
40.2
|
(i)
|
|
|
(119.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97.2
|
)(j)
|
|
|
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
(57.0
|
)
|
|
|
(95.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES, MINORITY
INTEREST AND EQUITY LOSS FROM VENTURES
|
|
|
380.7
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
93.1
|
|
|
|
510.0
|
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(84.1
|
)
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
|
(31.8
|
) (k)
|
|
|
(124.5
|
)
|
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)
|
EQUITY LOSS FROM VENTURES
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
|
|
269.8
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
|
358.9
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES
|
|
$
|
264.6
|
|
|
$
|
27.8
|
|
|
$
|
61.3
|
|
|
$
|
353.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (Continuing Operations)
BASIC
|
|
$
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (Continuing Operations)
DILUTED
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES (IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
82,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,962
|
|
|
|
152,950
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
105,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,508
|
|
|
|
175,534
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.
230
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information
|
|
Note 1.
|
Basis of
Presentation
|
On July 15, 2008, Cliffs and Alpha entered into the merger
agreement. Upon the terms and conditions set forth in the merger
agreement, Alpha stockholders will be entitled to receive 0.95
of a common share of Cliffs and $22.23 in cash on the date of
the merger for each share of Alpha common stock. At the closing
date of the merger, all outstanding shares of Alpha common stock
will automatically be cancelled.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information presents the pro forma consolidated
financial position and results of operations of the combined
company based upon the historical financial statements of Cliffs
and Alpha, after giving effect to the Alpha merger adjustments
described in these notes, and are intended to reflect the impact
of the merger on Cliffs. Certain amounts in Alphas
historical financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to Cliffs presentation.
The acquisition was accounted for in the unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial information using the purchase
method of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141, Business
Combinations, or SFAS 141, whereby the total cost of
the acquisition was allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values. The
allocation of the purchase price to acquired assets and
liabilities in the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
statement of financial position is based on managements
preliminary valuation estimates. Such allocations will be
finalized based on additional valuation and other studies.
Accordingly, the purchase price allocation adjustments and
related impacts on the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial information are preliminary and are
subject to revisions, which may be material, after the closing
of the merger.
As shown in adjustment 3(d) below, Cliffs expects the
accounting for the acquisition of Alpha to result in a
significant amount of goodwill. Goodwill is the excess cost of
the acquired company over the sum of the amounts assigned to
assets acquired less liabilities assumed. GAAP requires that
goodwill not be amortized, but instead allocated to a level
within the reporting entity referred to as the reporting unit
and tested for impairment, at least annually. Cliffs currently
believes that any goodwill created as a result of this
acquisition will be assigned to its North American Coal segment.
The merger is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization
under the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Code. The
merger is subject to certain regulatory approvals and customary
closing conditions, including adoption of the merger agreement
by Alphas stockholders and adoption of the merger
agreement and the approval of the issuance of Cliffs common
shares by the Cliffs shareholders. Subject to these conditions,
it is anticipated that the merger will be completed in the
fourth quarter of 2008.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Purchase
Price (In Millions, Except Share and Per Share Amount)
|
At the closing date of the merger, all outstanding shares of
Alpha common stock, including those resulting from the possible
conversion of Alphas senior notes and restricted stock
units, will automatically be canceled and holders of outstanding
shares of Alpha common stock will be entitled to receive common
shares of Cliffs at a conversion rate of 0.95 of a Cliffs common
share for each share of Alpha common stock. Additionally,
holders of outstanding shares of Alpha common stock will be
entitled to receive $22.23 in cash for each share of Alpha
common stock.
231
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information (Continued)
As of June 30, 2008, the preliminary estimated total
purchase price of the proposed transaction, exclusive of Alpha
cash, based on the average Cliffs share price for the five
business days surrounding and including the merger announcement
date of $104.88 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs share consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha common stock outstanding
|
|
$
|
7,023
|
|
Alpha converted senior notes
|
|
|
315
|
|
Alpha restricted stock units
|
|
|
1
|
|
Fair value of stock option exchange
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated stock consideration
|
|
|
7,398
|
|
Cash consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to Alpha stockholders
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
Cash portion of Alpha convertible senior notes
|
|
|
288
|
|
Estimated transaction costs
|
|
|
126
|
|
Cash portion of Alpha performance shares
|
|
|
75
|
|
Estimated change of control costs
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated cash consideration
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preliminary estimated purchase price
|
|
$
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information, the cash consideration component of the
preliminary estimated purchase price was estimated to be funded
by $190.5 Cliffs cash on hand, $1,900.0 new debt, and $55.5
borrowings on Cliffs revolving credit facility.
The estimated total cash consideration of the proposed
transaction was determined as follows:
Cash
Paid to Alpha Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha stock to be acquired (as of June 30, 2008)
|
|
|
70,482,861
|
|
Senior notes converted to Alpha stock
|
|
|
3,161,097
|
|
Alpha restricted stock units
|
|
|
14,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares subject to cash consideration
|
|
|
73,658,051
|
|
Cash consideration per share
|
|
$
|
22.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to Alpha stockholders
|
|
$
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Portion of Alpha Convertible Senior Notes
The $288 cash portion of Alpha convertible senior notes reflects
the cash that would be required to be paid to repay the carrying
value of the convertible senior notes upon their conversion at
June 30, 2008. Additionally, upon closing, holders of the
senior notes are entitled to receive Cliffs common shares in an
amount equal to the excess conversion value over the principal
amount, based on a defined conversion price formula, which is
included in the Cliffs share consideration component of the
total preliminary estimated purchase price.
Estimated
Transaction Costs
The $126 estimated transaction costs reflect managements
estimate of direct costs associated with the proposed
transaction, consisting primarily of financial advisory fees,
legal and accounting fees. These estimates are preliminary and,
therefore, are subject to change.
Cash
Portion of Alpha Performance Shares
The $75 cash portion of Alpha performance shares reflects the
cash payout by Cliffs for outstanding Alpha performance shares
(vested and unvested) at the closing. Specifically, it is
expected that 612,111 performance shares will be settled at a
cash price of $121.87.
232
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information (Continued)
Estimated
Change of Control Costs
The $20 estimated change of control costs represents
Cliffs obligation to fund certain Alpha change of control
obligations for certain Alpha executives arising from the
combination of Cliffs and Alpha.
The estimated total stock consideration of the proposed
transaction is based on the average Cliffs share price for the
five business day surrounding the merger announcement date as of
July 16, 2008 and a conversion rate of 0.95 of a common
share of Cliffs, is as follows:
Shares
of Alpha Common Stock Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated number of shares of Alpha stock to be acquired (as of
June 30, 2008)
|
|
|
70,482,861
|
|
Exchange offer ratio
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs common shares to be issued
|
|
|
66,958,718
|
|
Average market price of Cliffs common shares
|
|
$
|
104.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share consideration
|
|
$
|
7,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha
Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes converted to Alpha stock
|
|
|
3,161,097
|
|
Exchange offer ratio
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs common shares to be issued
|
|
|
3,003,042
|
|
Average market price of Cliffs common shares
|
|
$
|
104.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share consideration
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated number of Alpha restricted stock units
|
|
|
14,093
|
|
Exchange offer ratio
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cliffs common shares to be issued
|
|
|
13,388
|
|
Average market price of Cliffs common shares
|
|
$
|
104.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share consideration
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3.
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments (Table Amounts in Millions)
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
information includes the following pro forma adjustments to
reflect (1) the effects of common shares issuance and
additional financing necessary to complete the merger and
(2) the allocation of the purchase price, including
adjusting assets and liabilities to fair value, with related
changes in revenues, costs and expenses:
(a) Reflects the issuance of 70.0 million Cliffs
common shares in connection with the offer for all of the
outstanding shares of Alpha common stock, including the possible
conversion of Alphas convertible senior notes as well as
restricted stock units. The issuance of Cliffs common shares
totals $8.7 million at $0.125 per share par value and
capital in excess of par of $7,330.3 million. Additionally,
the pro forma adjustment reflects an estimated adjustment of
$59.0 million to capital in excess of par for the fair
value of Alpha stock options exchanged for Cliffs stock options,
which was estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.
In connection with the proposed merger, each outstanding stock
option of Alpha (unvested and vested) shall accelerate and
become immediately exercisable. The vested and exercisable stock
options of Alpha will then be exchanged for vested stock options
of Cliffs with substantially the same terms and conditions that
were
233
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information (Continued)
applicable under the Alpha stock plan. The $59.0 million
represents the estimated fair value of the Cliffs vested stock
options awarded to Alpha stock option holders, determined using
a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Regarding Alphas
outstanding performance shares, in connection with the proposed
merger, each outstanding unvested performance share of Alpha
shall vest and all performance shares will be settled with a
cash payment. The estimated cash payment has been included as a
component of the cash consideration element of the total
preliminary estimated purchase price.
(b) Reflects the estimated $1,900.0 million issuance
of debt by Cliffs for the portion of cash consideration paid to
Alpha stockholders in connection with the offer for all of the
outstanding shares of Alpha common stock as well as the
estimated $11.9 million deferred debt issuance costs
incurred by Cliffs in connection with the debt issuance.
Additionally, the pro forma adjustment reflects the estimated
$55.5 million borrowings on Cliffs revolving credit
facility.
(c) Reflects the estimated $190.5 million net payment
of cash from Cliffs cash on hand for consideration paid to Alpha
stockholders in connection with the offer for all of the
outstanding shares of Alpha common stock and retirement of
Alphas senior notes, as well as estimated transaction
costs and estimated change of control costs, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from term loan
|
|
$
|
1,900.0
|
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facility
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
Cash paid to Alpha stockholders
|
|
|
(1,637.0
|
)
|
Cash portion of Alpha convertible senior notes
|
|
|
(288.0
|
)
|
Estimated transaction costs
|
|
|
(126.0
|
)
|
Cash portion of Alpha performance and restricted stock units
|
|
|
(75.0
|
)
|
Estimated change of control costs
|
|
|
(20.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net estimated cash consideration
|
|
$
|
(190.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cash payments identified in the preceding table are
considered non-recurring payments related to the merger, and
such amounts were not considered in the pro forma condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007 or six-months ended June 30, 2008.
234
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information (Continued)
(d) The net assets to be acquired from Alpha, the pro forma
adjustments to reflect the fair value of Alphas net
reported assets and other purchase accounting adjustments are
estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha net assets on June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
666.7
|
|
Adjustment to eliminate historical Alpha goodwill
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate historical Alpha debt paid in merger
|
|
|
287.5
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of inventories*
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
Adjustment to accelerate amortization of Alpha debt issuance
costs
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
Adjustment to fair value of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
8,923.8
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of below market sales contracts
(current)
|
|
|
(749.1
|
)
|
Adjustment to fair value of below market sales contracts
(long-term)
|
|
|
(659.0
|
)
|
Adjustment to fair value of equity method investment
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of deferred revenue
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of other current liabilities
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of deferred tax assets
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
Adjustment to deferred taxes to reflect fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(2,923.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets and liabilities acquired
|
|
|
5,619.1
|
|
Preliminary allocation to goodwill
|
|
|
3,924.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
9,544.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The estimated expense associated with the amortization of the
purchase price allocation to the fair value of the acquired
inventory is expected to occur within the 12 months
succeeding the merger based on Alphas historical inventory
turnover ratio. Such charges were not considered in the pro
forma condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The allocation of the purchase price is based on
managements preliminary estimates and certain assumptions
with respect to the fair value of the acquired assets and
assumed liabilities. The ultimate fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed will be determined as of the
date of the close of the merger and may differ materially from
the amounts disclosed above in the pro forma purchase price
allocation due to changes in fair value of the related assets
and liabilities between June 30, 2008 and the close of the
merger, and as further and more comprehensive analysis is
completed, which may include the identification of certain
intangible assets not included above. As a result, the actual
allocation of the purchase price, and the corresponding
amortization, may result in different adjustments than those
noted above.
(e) Reflects the elimination of Alphas historical
stockholders equity.
(f) Reflects the estimated depreciation, depletion and
amortization expense associated with the preliminary fair value
adjustment of $8,923.8 million to property, plant and
equipment, which includes mineral properties and rights. For
purposes of preparing the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial information, management assumed average
estimated remaining useful lives ranging from five to
approximately 25 years for the underlying fixed assets and
mineral properties and rights.
(g) Reflects the estimated amortization associated with the
$1,408.1 million preliminary fair value adjustment to below
market sales contracts, which was estimated utilizing current
market conditions. For purposes of preparing the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial information, management
assumed a delivery period under these contracts of approximately
two years for the underlying below market sales contracts.
The below market sales contracts are numerous metallurgical and
steam coal contracts entered into prior to June 30, 2008,
with pricing commitments below the current market value of the
product. As a general rule, the contracts range in duration from
one to three years, with a few exceptions.
235
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information (Continued)
Market dynamics for coal have significantly changed since late
2007 and early 2008, with demand exceeding supply, causing a
significant increase in prices being paid for coal during such
period. The interest (and in some cases investments already
made) that international companies have shown in the
U.S. coal industry is further evidence of the changing
landscape. Pricing on contracts being signed post-June 2008 are,
generally speaking, significantly higher than those signed in
2006, 2007, and early 2008 time periods.
To determine the $1,408.1 million liability, approximately
31 million tons of contracted tonnage through the end of
2010 was considered in the computation. Based upon Cliffs
and Alphas view of the market, it was determined that the
sales contracts covering these tons were on average
approximately $58 per ton below current market. Contracts
entered into around June 30, 2008 were then indicative of
very favorable pricing, supporting Cliffs and Alphas
view of existing below market contracts. The increased revenue
would be offset by additional royalty and severance tax expense
of approximately $4 per ton as these expenses vary with sales
price, making the net undiscounted liability approximately $54
per ton. The liability was then discounted based upon the year
the contracted tonnage is to be delivered to arrive at the
$1,408.1 million.
(h) Reflects the estimated amortization expense associated
with the $39.9 million preliminary fair value adjustment to
an equity method investment. For purposes of preparing the
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
information, management assumed a useful life of approximately
25 years for the equity method investment.
(i) Reflects the elimination of Alphas historical
interest expense on the senior notes and term loan, assuming the
repayment of such debt as of the beginning of the period
presented.
(j) Reflects the pro forma interest expense on Cliffs
incremental borrowings, and the associated amortization of
deferred debt issuance costs, assuming the borrowings as of the
beginning of the period presented to fund a component of the
cash consideration in connection with the merger. A 12.5
basis-point change in interest rate on the acquisition-related
debt would increase (decrease) interest expense by approximately
$2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
by approximately $1.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008.
(k) Reflects the tax effect of pro forma adjustments
calculated at an estimated statutory rate of 38.5%, offset by
the reversal of the valuation allowance recorded in Alphas
historical tax expense which is estimated to be released due to
the acquisition.
(l) Reflects reclassification of Cliffs historical goodwill
from Other non-current assets to a separate goodwill
classification to conform to the pro forma presentation.
(m) Reflects the pro forma adjustments to deferred taxes to
achieve the estimated classification of net deferred taxes
between current and long-term after considering the historical
deferred taxes of Cliffs and Alpha, as well as the other pro
forma adjustments to deferred taxes identified under
(d) above.
(n) Reflects the estimated payment of Alphas
$233.1 million term loan, as well as the $13.5 million
related interest rate swap arrangement, resulting from the
change in control of Alpha upon consummation of the merger.
236
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information (Continued)
|
|
Note 4.
|
Combined
Pro Forma Reserves (Tons in Millions)
|
The following reserve data is derived from Cliffs and
Alphas annual reports on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007. Cliffs and Alpha
historically update their reserve estimates during the fourth
quarter of each fiscal year and neither have updated their
reserve estimates from the information contained in their
respective annual reports on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007. However, production
from the properties for the 2008 period would reduce the
reserves as reported at December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Production Through June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cliffs
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total Reserves, by Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Ore (1)
|
|
|
1,003.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,003.5
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
Coal (2)
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
617.5
|
|
|
|
767.9
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,153.9
|
|
|
|
617.5
|
|
|
|
1,771.4
|
|
|
|
(17.7
|
)
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
(29.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reserves, by Geographic Region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
262.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262.0
|
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
607.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607.0
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
Canada
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Australia
|
|
|
95.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.5
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,003.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,003.5
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
Coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky/Pennsylvania/Virginia/West Virginia
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
|
617.5
|
|
|
|
691.5
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
Alabama
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Australia
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
617.5
|
|
|
|
767.9
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,153.9
|
|
|
|
617.5
|
|
|
|
1,771.4
|
|
|
|
(17.7
|
)
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
(29.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reserves listed on 100 percent
basis. Cliffs has an approximately 27 percent interest in a
Canadian iron ore joint venture, a 23 percent interest in a
United States iron ore joint venture and a 50 percent interest
in an Australian iron ore joint venture owned through one of
Cliffs majority-owned mining ventures. All other iron ore
mining ventures are wholly-owned or majority-owned.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reserves listed on 100 percent
basis. Cliffs has an effective 45 percent interest in an
Australian coal operation.
|
237
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the Cliffs common shares to be issued in the
merger will be passed upon for Cliffs by George W.
Hawk, Jr., Esq., Cliffs General Counsel and
Secretary. As of October 23, 2008, Mr. Hawk held 7,931
Cliffs common shares. The material United States federal income
tax consequences of the merger as described in Material
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences beginning on
page 93 will be passed upon for Cliffs by Jones Day and for
Alpha by Cleary Gottlieb.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2007, included in the registration
statement and the related financial statement schedule included
elsewhere in the registration statement, and the effectiveness
of Cleveland-Cliffs Incs internal control over financial
reporting have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their reports (which, as to the report related to the
consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified
opinion, and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
adoption of new accounting standards), appearing herein and
elsewhere in the registration statement. Such financial
statements and financial statement schedule have been so
included in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon
their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Alpha as of
December 31, 2007, and 2006, and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007
have been incorporated by reference herein and in the
registration statement in reliance on the reports of KPMG LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated
by reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm as
experts in accounting and auditing. KPMG LLPs reports on
the consolidated financial statements refer to Alphas
change in the method of accounting and reporting for share-based
payments, its method of accounting for postretirement benefits
and its method of quantifying errors in 2006.
SUBMISSION
OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Cliffs. Pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act, Cliffs shareholders may present proper
proposals for inclusion in Cliffs proxy statement and for
consideration at the next annual meeting of Cliffs shareholders
by submitting their proposals to Cliffs in a timely manner. Any
proposal of a Cliffs shareholder intended to be included in
Cliffs proxy statement and form of proxy card for
Cliffs 2009 annual meeting pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act must be received by Cliffs on or before
November 26, 2008 (or, if the date of the 2009 annual
meeting is more than 30 days before or after May 13,
2009, a reasonable time before Cliffs begins to print and mail
its 2009 annual meeting proxy materials). You should follow the
procedures described in
Rule 14a-8
of the Exchange Act and send the proposal to Cliffs
principal executive offices: Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., 1100
Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio
44114-2544,
Attention: Corporate Secretary.
Alpha. Pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act, Alpha stockholders may present proper
proposals for inclusion in Alphas proxy statement and for
consideration at the next annual meeting of Alpha stockholders
by submitting their proposals to Alpha in a timely manner. Alpha
will hold an annual meeting in the year 2009 only if the merger
has not already been completed. Any proposal of an Alpha
stockholder intended to be included in Alphas proxy
statement and form of proxy/voting instruction card for its 2009
annual meeting pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act must be received by Alpha no later than
December 3, 2008, unless the date of Alphas 2009
annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from
May 14, 2009, in which case the proposal must be received a
reasonable time before Alpha begins to print and mail its annual
meeting proxy materials.
In addition, Alphas bylaws include requirements that Alpha
stockholders must comply with in order to propose business to be
considered at an annual meeting. These requirements are separate
from and in addition to the requirements of the SEC that a
stockholder must meet to have a proposal included in
Alphas proxy statement. Alphas bylaws require that,
in order for a stockholder to propose business to be considered
by the stockholders at an annual meeting, the stockholder must
be entitled to vote at the meeting, must provide a written
notice to Alphas
238
Corporate Secretary at
c/o Alpha
Natural Resources, Inc., One Alpha Place,
P.O. Box 2345, Abingdon, Virginia 24212, and must be a
stockholder of record at the time of giving the notice. The
notice must specify (i) as to each person whom the
stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director,
information with respect to the proposed nominee as would be
required to be included in the proxy statement for the Annual
Meeting if the person were a nominee included in that proxy
statement, including the proposed nominees written consent
to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve
as a director, (ii) as to any other business that the
stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting, a brief
description of the business, the text of any resolution proposed
to be adopted at the meeting, the reasons for conducting the
business and any material interest in the business that the
stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf
the proposal is made, may have, and (iii) as to the
stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any,
on whose behalf the nomination is made, the name and address of
the stockholder as they appear on Alphas books and of the
beneficial owner, and the class and number of Alpha shares of
stock owned beneficially and of record by the stockholder and
the beneficial owner. Alphas bylaws require the notice to
be given not earlier than December 3, 2008 and not later
than January 2, 2009, unless the date of the annual meeting
is more than 30 days before or after May 14, 2009, in
which case the notice must be given not earlier than
120 days prior to the 2009 annual meeting and not later
than the close of business on the later of the 90th day
prior to the 2009 annual meeting or the 10th day following
public announcement of the date of the 2009 annual meeting. If
the number of directors to be elected at the 2009 annual meeting
is increased and Alpha does not make a public announcement
naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size
of the increased board by December 23, 2008, then a
stockholder notice recommending prospective nominee(s) for any
new position(s) created by the increase will be considered
timely if it is received by Alphas Corporate Secretary not
later than the close of business on the 10th calendar day
following the date of Alphas public announcement.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Cliffs and Alpha file annual, quarterly and current reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may
read and copy materials that Cliffs and Alpha have filed with
the SEC at the following SEC public reference room:
100 F Street,
N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the operation of the public reference
room.
Cliffs and Alphas SEC filings are also available for
free to the public on the SECs Internet website at
http://www.sec.gov,
which contains reports, proxy and information statements and
other information regarding companies that file electronically
with the SEC. In addition, Cliffs SEC filings are also
available for free to the public on Cliffs website,
http://www.cliffsnaturalresources.com,
and Alphas filings with the SEC are also available for
free to the public on Alphas website,
http://www.alphanr.com.
Information contained on Cliffs website and Alphas
website is not incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and you should not consider information
contained on those websites as part of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Each of Cliffs and Alpha incorporates by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus the documents listed below, and
any filings Cliffs or Alpha makes with the SEC under
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after
the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus until the
respective dates of the Cliffs and Alpha special meetings shall
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The information incorporated by reference
is an important part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Any statement in a document incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus will be deemed to be modified
or superseded for purposes of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to the extent a statement contained in this
or any other subsequently filed document that is incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus modifies or
supersedes such statement. Any statement so modified or
superseded will not be deemed, except as so modified or
superseded, to constitute a part of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
239
Cliffs
SEC Filings
|
|
|
Commission File Number 1-8944
|
|
Period
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on January 3, 2008; Filed on January 9, 2008; Filed on
March 4, 2008; Filed on March 13, 2008; Filed on March 14, 2008;
Filed on April 1, 2008; Filed on April 3, 2008; Filed on April
23, 2008; Filed on May 5, 2008; Filed on May 13, 2008;
Filed on May 14, 2008; Filed on May 14, 2008; Filed on May 15,
2008; Filed on May 16, 2008; Filed on May 21, 2008; Filed on
May 21, 2008 (amended); Filed on May 23, 2008; Filed on May
30, 2008; Filed on June 12, 2008; Filed on June 30, 2008; Filed
on June 30, 2008; Filed on July 1, 2008; Filed on July 9, 2008;
Filed on July 9, 2008; Filed on July 11, 2008; Filed on July 15,
2008; Filed on July 16, 2008; Filed on July 17, 2008; Filed
on July 22, 2008; Filed on August 14, 2008; Filed on August
22, 2008; Filed on August 22, 2008; Filed on September 2, 2008;
Filed on September 11, 2008; Filed on September 11, 2008;
Filed on September 19, 2008; Filed on September 22, 2008; Filed
on September 30, 2008; Filed on October 1, 2008; Filed on
October 3, 2008; Filed on October 6, 2008; Filed on October 6,
2008; Filed on October 9, 2008; Filed on October 10,
2008; Filed on October 14, 2008; Filed on October 15,
2008; and Filed on October 16, 2008.
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2008 (filed May 6, 2008); and Quarter
ended June 30, 2008 (filed July 31, 2008).
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007 (filed February 29, 2008).
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
Filed on March 26, 2008.
|
In addition, Cliffs incorporates by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
the description of Cliffs common shares contained in the amended
current report on Form 8-K filed on May 21, 2008; and
|
|
|
|
the description of rights under the rights agreement contained
in Form 8-A filed on October 14, 2008.
|
You can obtain a copy of any document incorporated by reference
into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, except for the
exhibits to those documents, from Cliffs. You may also obtain
these documents from the SEC or through the SECs website
described above. Documents incorporated by reference are
available from Cliffs without charge, excluding all exhibits
unless specifically incorporated by reference as an exhibit into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You may obtain documents
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from Cliffs at the following address and telephone
number:
Cliffs
Natural Resources Inc.
1100 Superior Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio
44114-2544
Attention: Investor Relations
(216) 694-5700
If you would like to request documents, please do so by
November 14, 2008, to receive them before the Cliffs
special meeting. If you request any of these documents from
Cliffs, Cliffs will mail them to you by first-class mail, or
similar means.
240
Alpha SEC
Filings
|
|
|
Commission File No. 1-32423
|
|
Period
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on March 6, 2008; Filed on April 3, 2008; Filed
on April 7, 2008; Filed on April 9, 2008; Filed on
April 15, 2008; Filed on April 21, 2008; Filed on
May 16, 2008; Filed on June 23, 2008; Filed on
July 2, 2008; Filed on July 16, 2008; Filed on
July 17, 2008; Filed on August 13, 2008; Filed on
August 25, 2008; and Filed on October 17, 2008.
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2008 (filed May 5, 2008); and Quarter
ended June 30, 2008 (filed August 4, 2008).
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007 (filed February 29, 2008).
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
Filed on March 27, 2008.
|
You can obtain a copy of any document incorporated by reference
into this joint proxy statement/prospectus except for the
exhibits to those documents from Alpha. You may also obtain
these documents from the SEC or through the SECs website
described above. Documents incorporated by reference are
available from Alpha without charge, excluding all exhibits
unless specifically incorporated by reference as an exhibit into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You may obtain documents
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from Alpha at the following address and telephone
number:
Alpha
Natural Resources, Inc.
One Alpha Place, P.O. Box 2345
Abingdon, Virginia 24212
Attention: Investor Relations
(276) 619-4410
If you would like to request documents, please do so by
November 14, 2008, to receive them before the Alpha
special meeting. If you request any of these documents from
Alpha, Alpha will mail them to you by first-class mail, or
similar means.
Cliffs has supplied all information contained in or incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus relating
to Cliffs and its affiliates, and Alpha has supplied all
information contained in or incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus relating to Alpha and its
affiliates.
You should rely only on the information contained in, or
incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy
statement/prospectus in voting your shares at the Alpha or
Cliffs special meeting, as applicable. Neither Cliffs nor Alpha
has authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different from what is contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is
dated October 23, 2008. You should not assume that the
information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
is accurate as of any other date, and neither the mailing of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus to Cliffs shareholders and
Alpha stockholders nor the consummation of the merger will
create any implication to the contrary.
241
Statements
of Consolidated Financial Position
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
157.1
|
|
|
$
|
351.7
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
84.9
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
241.9
|
|
|
|
200.9
|
|
Supplies and other inventories
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
77.5
|
|
Deferred and refundable taxes
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
69.5
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
Other
|
|
|
104.5
|
|
|
|
77.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
754.6
|
|
|
|
782.3
|
|
NET PROPERTIES
|
|
|
1,823.9
|
|
|
|
884.9
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pensions salaried
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Long-term receivables
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
42.1
|
|
|
|
107.0
|
|
Deposits and miscellaneous
|
|
|
89.5
|
|
|
|
83.7
|
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
265.3
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
497.3
|
|
|
|
272.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
3,075.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,939.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
149.9
|
|
|
$
|
142.4
|
|
Accrued employment costs
|
|
|
73.2
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
Other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
State and local taxes payable
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
Environmental and mine closure obligations
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
62.6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
399.6
|
|
|
|
374.9
|
|
POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions
|
|
|
90.0
|
|
|
|
140.4
|
|
Other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
114.8
|
|
|
|
139.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
204.8
|
|
|
|
279.4
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MINE CLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
123.2
|
|
|
|
95.1
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
189.0
|
|
|
|
117.9
|
|
REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY
|
|
|
240.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
TERM LOAN
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
99.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED PAYMENT
|
|
|
96.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
|
107.3
|
|
|
|
68.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
1,659.6
|
|
|
|
935.8
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
117.8
|
|
|
|
85.8
|
|
3.25% REDEEMABLE CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE PERPETUAL PREFERRED
STOCK ISSUED 172,500 SHARES 134,715 AND 172,300
OUTSTANDING IN 2007 AND 2006
|
|
|
134.7
|
|
|
|
172.3
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock no par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A 3,000,000 shares authorized and
unissued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B 4,000,000 shares authorized and
unissued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares par value $0.125 a share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 224,000,000 shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 134,623,528 shares
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
Capital in excess of par value of shares
|
|
|
116.6
|
|
|
|
103.2
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
1,316.2
|
|
|
|
1,078.5
|
|
Cost of 47,455,922 Common Shares in treasury (2006
52,812,828 shares)
|
|
|
(255.6
|
)
|
|
|
(282.8
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(30.3
|
)
|
|
|
(169.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
1,163.7
|
|
|
|
745.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
3,075.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,939.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-1
Statements
of Consolidated Operations
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
REVENUES FROM PRODUCT SALES AND SERVICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
1,997.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,669.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,512.2
|
|
Freight and venture partners cost reimbursements
|
|
|
277.9
|
|
|
|
252.6
|
|
|
|
227.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,275.2
|
|
|
|
1,921.7
|
|
|
|
1,739.5
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD AND OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
(1,813.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,507.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1,350.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SALES MARGIN
|
|
|
462.0
|
|
|
|
414.0
|
|
|
|
389.0
|
|
OTHER OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties and management fee revenue
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Casualty recoveries
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(114.2
|
)
|
|
|
(72.4
|
)
|
|
|
(62.1
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets net
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous net
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80.4
|
)
|
|
|
(48.3
|
)
|
|
|
(32.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
381.6
|
|
|
|
365.7
|
|
|
|
356.5
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES, MINORITY
INTEREST, EQUITY LOSS FROM VENTURES AND CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF
ACCOUNTING CHANGE
|
|
|
380.7
|
|
|
|
387.8
|
|
|
|
368.1
|
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(84.1
|
)
|
|
|
(90.9
|
)
|
|
|
(84.8
|
)
|
MINORITY INTEREST (net of tax $4.7 million,
$7.3 million and $5.4 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005)
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
|
|
(17.1
|
)
|
|
|
(10.1
|
)
|
EQUITY LOSS FROM VENTURES
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
|
|
269.8
|
|
|
|
279.8
|
|
|
|
273.2
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (net of tax
0.2 million, $0.2 million and $0.4 million in
2007, 2006 and 2005)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE
|
|
|
270.0
|
|
|
|
280.1
|
|
|
|
272.4
|
|
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE (net of tax
$2.8 million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
270.0
|
|
|
|
280.1
|
|
|
|
277.6
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES
|
|
$
|
264.8
|
|
|
$
|
274.5
|
|
|
$
|
272.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE BASIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
$
|
3.08
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE BASIC
|
|
$
|
3.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
$
|
3.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE DILUTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE DILUTED
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES (In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
82,988
|
|
|
|
84,144
|
|
|
|
86,912
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
105,026
|
|
|
|
107,654
|
|
|
|
111,346
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Statements
of Consolidated Cash Flows
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions, brackets indicate cash decrease)
|
|
|
CASH FLOW FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
270.0
|
|
|
$
|
280.1
|
|
|
$
|
277.6
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
107.2
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
|
|
|
42.8
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss in ventures (net of tax)
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental and closure obligation
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Pensions and other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
|
|
(40.3
|
)
|
|
|
(35.2
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(33.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Derivatives and currency hedges
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Casualty recoveries
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)
|
Proceeds from casualty recoveries
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables & other assets
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
73.0
|
|
|
|
(64.8
|
)
|
Product inventories
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(29.9
|
)
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(34.2
|
)
|
|
|
62.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Payables and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
Sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
182.8
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
288.9
|
|
|
|
428.5
|
|
|
|
514.6
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of PinnOak
|
|
|
(343.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
(199.5
|
)
|
|
|
(119.5
|
)
|
|
|
(97.8
|
)
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
(180.6
|
)
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
Purchase of marketable securities
|
|
|
(85.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of marketable securities
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Investment in Portman Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(409.0
|
)
|
Payment of currency hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(745.4
|
)
|
|
|
(127.4
|
)
|
|
|
(520.7
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facilities
|
|
|
1,195.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175.0
|
|
Repayments under credit facilities
|
|
|
(755.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175.0
|
)
|
Repayment of PinnOak debt
|
|
|
(159.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock dividends
|
|
|
(20.9
|
)
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
Preferred Stock dividends
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of other borrowings
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of Common Stock
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(121.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance costs of revolving credit
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions by minority interest
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from (used by) financing activities
|
|
|
250.1
|
|
|
|
(148.4
|
)
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FROM (USED BY) CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
|
|
(194.6
|
)
|
|
|
158.6
|
|
|
|
(21.9
|
)
|
CASH FROM (USED BY) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
INVESTING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(194.6
|
)
|
|
|
158.9
|
|
|
|
(24.1
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
|
|
351.7
|
|
|
|
192.8
|
|
|
|
216.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
|
|
$
|
157.1
|
|
|
$
|
351.7
|
|
|
$
|
192.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Statements
of Consolidated Shareholders Equity
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
hensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
January 1, 2005
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
$
|
92.3
|
|
|
$
|
565.3
|
|
|
$
|
(169.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(81.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
424.0
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277.6
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Unrealized loss on Foreign Currency Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.7
|
)
|
|
|
(24.7
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233.0
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Stock and other incentive plans
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Preferred Stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
Common Stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
100.5
|
|
|
|
824.2
|
|
|
|
(164.3
|
)
|
|
|
(125.6
|
)
|
|
|
651.6
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280.1
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension and OPEB liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Unrealized gain on Foreign Currency Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346.5
|
|
Effect of implementing SFAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110.7
|
)
|
|
|
(110.7
|
)
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Stock and other incentive plans
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Stock split
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of Common Stock
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121.5
|
)
|
Conversion of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Preferred Stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
Common Stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
103.2
|
|
|
|
1,078.5
|
|
|
|
(282.8
|
)
|
|
|
(169.9
|
)
|
|
|
745.8
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270.0
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and OPEB liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
Unrealized net gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Unrealized net gain on Foreign Currency Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.9
|
|
|
|
86.9
|
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409.6
|
|
Effect of implementing FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Stock and other incentive plans
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Repurchases of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
Conversion of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.6
|
|
Preferred Stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
Common Stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
87.2
|
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
$
|
116.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,316.2
|
|
|
$
|
(255.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,163.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
NOTE 1
|
BUSINESS
SUMMARY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Business
Summary
We are an international mining company, the largest producer of
iron ore pellets in North America and a major supplier of
metallurgical coal to the global steelmaking industry. We
operate six iron ore mines in Michigan, Minnesota and Eastern
Canada, and three coking coal mines in West Virginia and
Alabama. We also own 80.4 percent of Portman, a large iron
ore mining company in Australia, serving the Asian iron ore
markets with direct-shipping fines and lump ore. In addition, we
have a 30 percent interest in the Amapá Project, a
Brazilian iron ore project, and a 45 percent economic
interest in the Sonoma Project, an Australian coking and thermal
coal project. Our company is organized and managed according to
product category and geographic location: North American Iron
Ore, North American Coal, Asia-Pacific Iron Ore, Asia-Pacific
Coal and Latin American Iron Ore.
Accounting
Policies
We consider the following policies to be beneficial in
understanding the judgments that are involved in the preparation
of our consolidated financial statements and the uncertainties
that could impact our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
Reclassifications: Certain amounts in the
prior years consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. They
included the reclassification of certain amounts included in
Miscellaneous-net
to Sales, General and Administrative expenses and
Other-net to
Interest expense.
Basis of Consolidation: The consolidated
financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of
our consolidated subsidiaries, including the following
significant subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Name
|
|
Location
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Northshore
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Pinnacle
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Oak Grove
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Tilden
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
85.0
|
|
Portman
|
|
Western Australia
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
Empire
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
United Taconite
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
Intercompany accounts are eliminated in consolidation.
Our investments in ventures include our 30 percent equity
interest in Amapá, a project located in Brazil, our
23 percent equity interest in Hibbing, an unincorporated
joint venture in Minnesota, and our 26.83 percent equity
interest in Wabush, an unincorporated joint venture located in
Canada, and Portmans 50 percent non-controlling
interest in Cockatoo Island.
Investments in joint ventures in which our ownership is
50 percent or less, or in which we do not have control but
have the ability to exercise significant influence over
operating and financial policies, are accounted for under the
equity method. Our share of equity income (loss) is eliminated
against consolidated product inventory upon production, and
against cost of goods sold and operating expenses when sold.
This effectively reduces our cost for our share of the mining
ventures production to its cost, reflecting the cost-based
nature of our participation in unconsolidated ventures.
Sonoma Coal Project: We own 100 percent
of CAWO, 8.33 percent of the Mining Assets and
45 percent of the Non-Mining Assets. Through various
interrelated arrangements, we achieve a 45 percent economic
interest in Sonoma despite the stated ownership of the
individual pieces of the Sonoma Project. CAWO is consolidated as
a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and because we are the
primary beneficiary, we absorb greater than
F-5
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
50 percent of the residual returns and expected losses of
CAWO. We have an undivided interest in the Mining and Non-Mining
Assets of the Sonoma Coal Project and, as it is in an extractive
industry, we pro rata consolidate these assets and its share of
costs in accordance with
EITF 00-1,
Investor Balance Sheet and Income Statement Display under the
Equity Method for Investments in Certain Partnerships and Other
Ventures. Although SMM does not have sufficient equity at
risk and accordingly is a VIE under paragraph 5(a) of
FIN 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,
we are not the primary beneficiary of SMM. Accordingly, we
account for our investment in SMM in accordance with the equity
method.
Our 30 percent ownership interest in Amapá, in which
we do not have control but have the ability to exercise
influence over operating and financial policies, is accounted
for under the equity method. Accordingly our share of the
results from Amapá are reflected as Equity loss from
ventures on the Statements of Consolidated Operations.
The financial information of Amapá included in our
financial statements is as of and for the period from the date
of acquisition through November 30, 2007. The earlier
cut-off is to allow for sufficient time needed by Amapá to
properly close and prepare complete financial information,
including consolidating and eliminating entries, conversion to
U.S. GAAP and review and approval by the Company. There
were no intervening transactions or events which materially
affect Amapás financial position or results of
operations that were not reflected in our year-end financial
statements.
The following table presents the detail of our Investments in
ventures and where those investments are classified on the
Statements of Consolidated Financial Position. Parentheses
indicate a net liability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Investment
|
|
Classification
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Amapá
|
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
247.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Wabush
|
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Cockatoo
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
Hibbing
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
Other
|
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
255.1
|
|
|
$
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Recognition:
North
American Iron Ore
Revenue is recognized on the sale of products when title to the
product has transferred to the customer in accordance with the
specified terms of each term supply agreement and all applicable
criteria for revenue recognition have been satisfied. Generally,
our North American Iron Ore term supply agreements provide that
title and risk of loss pass to the customer when payment is
received. This is a practice utilized to reduce our financial
risk due to customer insolvency. This practice is not believed
to be widely used throughout the balance of the industry.
The Company recognizes revenue based on the gross amount billed
to a customer as it earned revenue from the sale of the goods or
services. Revenue from product sales also includes reimbursement
for freight charges paid on behalf of customers in Freight
and Venture Partners Cost Reimbursements separate from
product revenue, in accordance with
EITF 00-10,
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs.
The mining ventures function as captive cost companies; they
supply product only to their owners effectively on a cost basis.
Accordingly, the minority interests revenue amounts are
stated at cost of production and are offset in entirety by an
equal amount included in cost of goods sold resulting in no
sales margin reflected in minority interest participants. As the
Company is responsible for product fulfillment, it has the risks
and rewards of a
F-6
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
principal in the transaction and accordingly records revenue in
this arrangement on a gross basis in accordance with
EITF 99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an
Agent, in Freight and Venture Partners Cost
Reimbursements.
Following is a summary of reimbursements in our North American
Iron Ore operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Reimbursements for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight
|
|
$
|
78.3
|
|
|
$
|
70.4
|
|
|
$
|
70.5
|
|
Venture partners cost
|
|
|
197.3
|
|
|
|
182.2
|
|
|
|
156.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reimbursements
|
|
$
|
275.6
|
|
|
$
|
252.6
|
|
|
$
|
227.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under some term supply agreements, we ship the product to ports
on the lower Great Lakes
and/or to
the customers facilities prior to the transfer of title.
Certain supply agreements with one customer include provisions
for supplemental revenue or refunds based on the customers
annual steel pricing for the year the product is consumed in the
customers blast furnaces. We account for this provision as
a derivative instrument at the time of sale and record this
provision at fair value until the year the product is consumed
and the amounts are settled as an adjustment to revenue.
We have long-term supply agreements with several North American
Iron Ore customers which include take-or-pay provisions that
require the customer to purchase a specified number of tons of
iron ore pellets each calendar year. In order to comply with the
take-or-pay provisions of their existing long-term supply
agreements, two of our customers purchased and paid for
approximately 1.5 million tons of iron ore pellets in
stockpiles at the end of 2007. The customers requested via a
fixed shipping schedule that the Company not ship the iron ore
until the spring of 2008, when the Great Lakes waterways re-open
for shipping. Revenue of $87 million was recorded in the
fourth quarter of 2007 related to these transactions.
Where we are joint venture participants in the ownership of a
mine, our contracts entitle us to receive royalties
and/or
management fees, which we earn as the pellets are produced.
Revenue is recognized on the sale of services when the services
are performed.
North
American Coal
Revenue is recognized when title passes to the customer. For
domestic coal sales, this generally occurs when coal is loaded
into rail cars at the mine. For export coal sales, this
generally occurs when coal is loaded into the vessel at the
terminal. Revenue from product sales since the July 31,
2007 acquisition included reimbursement for freight charges of
$2.3 million paid on behalf of customers.
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Portmans sales revenue is recognized at the F.O.B. point,
which is generally when the product is loaded into the vessel.
Deferred Revenue: The terms of one of our
North American Iron Ore pellet supply agreements require
bi-monthly installments equaling 1/24th of the estimated
total purchase value of the calendar-year nomination. Revenue
from this supply agreement is recognized when title has
transferred upon shipment of pellets. Installment amounts
received in excess of sales totaled $14.6 million and were
recorded as Deferred revenue on the December 31,
2007 Statements of Consolidated Financial Position.
Two of our customers purchased and paid for approximately
1.5 million tons of iron ore pellets in stockpiles in the
fourth quarter of 2007. The customers requested the Company,
under a fixed shipment schedule, to not ship the iron ore until
the spring of 2008, when the Great Lakes waterways re-open for
shipping. Freight revenue related to
F-7
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
these transactions of $13.8 million was deferred on the
December 31, 2007 Statements of Consolidated Financial
Position until the product is delivered in 2008.
Two of our North American Iron Ore customers purchased and paid
for a total of 1.2 million tons of pellets in December 2006
under terms of take-or-pay contracts. The inventory was stored
at our facilities in upper lakes stockpiles. At the request of
the customers, the ore was not shipped. We considered whether
revenue should be recognized on these sales under the bill
and hold guidance discussed in SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 104 Topic No. 13, but because a
fixed shipment schedule was not established prior to year-end,
revenue recognition on these transactions, totaling
$62.6 million, was deferred on the December 31, 2006
Statements of Consolidated Financial Position until the product
was delivered in 2007.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial
statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from estimates.
Cash Equivalents: We consider investments in
highly liquid debt instruments with an initial maturity of three
months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Marketable Securities: We determine the
appropriate classification of debt and equity securities at the
time of purchase and re-evaluate such designation as of each
balance sheet date. We evaluate our investments in securities
for impairment at each reporting period in accordance with
SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities. If a decline in fair value is judged
other than temporary, the basis of the individual security is
written down to fair value as a new cost basis and the amount of
the write-down is included as a realized loss. At
December 31, 2007 and 2006, we had $74.6 million and
$28.9 million, respectively, of marketable securities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Held to maturity current
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Held to maturity non-current
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale non-current
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
74.6
|
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities classified as held-to-maturity
are stated at cost. The held-to-maturity investments are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
|
$
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
Floating rate notes
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The held-to-maturity securities have maturities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
1 to 5 years
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities classified as available for
sale, are stated at fair value, with unrealized holding
gains and losses included in Other comprehensive income.
The available-for-sale investments are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
We intend to hold our shares of equity securities indefinitely.
See NOTE 14 FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS for further information.
Derivative Financial Instruments: Portman
receives funds in United States currency for its iron ore sales.
Portman uses forward exchange contracts, call options, collar
options and convertible collar options, designated as cash flow
hedges, to hedge its foreign currency exposure for a portion of
its sales receipts denominated in United States currency.
United States currency is converted to Australian dollars at the
currency exchange rate in effect at the time of the transaction.
The primary objective for the use of these instruments is to
reduce the volatility of earnings due to changes in the
Australian and United States currency exchange rates, and to
protect against undue adverse movement in these exchange rates.
The instruments are subject to formal documentation, intended to
achieve qualifying hedge treatment, and are tested at inception
and at each reporting period as to effectiveness. Portmans
policy is to hedge no more than 90 percent of anticipated
sales up to 12 months, no more than 75 percent of
anticipated sales from 13 to 24 months and no more than
50 percent of anticipated sales from 25 to 36 months.
In 2007, 2006 and 2005, $0.7 million, $2.7 million and
$9.8 million, respectively, of pre-acquisition hedge
contracts were settled and recognized as a reduction of
revenues. Changes in fair value for highly effective hedges are
recorded as a component of Other comprehensive income.
Unrealized gains totaled $18.7 million and
$4.5 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively. In 2007, 2006
and 2005, ineffectiveness resulting in a $17.0 million
loss, $2.7 million gain and a $2.6 million loss,
respectively, were charged to
Miscellaneous-net
on the Statements of Consolidated Operations. We estimate
$14.4 million of cash flow hedge contracts will be settled
due to the settling of revenue contracts and reclassified into
earnings in the next 12 months.
At December 31, 2007, Portman had outstanding
$362.5 million in the form of call options, collar options,
convertible collars and forward exchange contracts with varying
maturity dates ranging from January 2008 to November 2010, and a
fair value adjustment based on the December 31, 2007 spot
rate of $21.3 million. We had $15.7 million and
$6.3 million of hedge contracts recorded as Derivative
assets on the December 31, 2007 and 2006 Statements of
Consolidated Financial Position, respectively, and
$5.9 million and $3.6 million of hedge contracts
recorded as long-term assets as Deposits and miscellaneous
on the Statements of Consolidated Financial Position at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Most of our North American Iron Ore long-term supply agreements
are comprised of a base price with annual price adjustment
factors. These price adjustment factors vary from agreement to
agreement but typically include
F-9
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
adjustments based upon changes in international pellet prices,
changes in specified Producers Price Indices including those for
all commodities, industrial commodities, energy and steel. The
adjustments generally operate in the same manner, with each
factor typically comprising a portion of the price adjustment,
although the weighting of each factor varies from agreement to
agreement. One of our term supply agreements contains price
collars, which typically limit the percentage increase or
decrease in prices for our iron ore pellets during any given
year. In most cases, these adjustment factors have not been
finalized at the time our product is sold; we routinely estimate
these adjustment factors. The price adjustment factors have been
evaluated to determine if they contain embedded derivatives. We
evaluated the embedded derivatives in the supply agreements in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The price
adjustment factors share the same economic characteristics and
risks as the host contract and are integral to the host contract
as inflation adjustments; accordingly they have not been
separately valued as derivative instruments.
Certain iron ore supply agreements with one of our North
American customers include provisions for supplemental revenue
or refunds based on the customers annual steel pricing for
the year the product is consumed in the customers blast
furnace. The supplemental pricing is characterized as an
embedded derivative and is required to be accounted for
separately from the base contract price. The embedded derivative
instrument, which is finalized based on a future price, is
marked to fair value as a revenue adjustment each reporting
period until the year the pellets are consumed and the amounts
are settled. The amounts, totaling $98.3 million,
$107.9 million, and $65.9 million, were recognized as
Product revenues in the Statements of Consolidated
Operations, in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Derivative
assets, representing the fair value of pricing factors, were
$53.8 million and $26.6 million on the
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 Statements of
Consolidated Financial Position, respectively.
In the normal course of business, we enter into forward
contracts designated as normal purchases, for the purchase of
commodities, primarily natural gas and diesel fuel, which are
used in our North American operations. Such contracts are in
quantities expected to be delivered and used in the production
process and are not intended for resale or speculative purposes.
Effective October 19, 2007, we entered into a
$100 million fixed interest rate swap to convert a portion
of our floating rate debt into fixed rate debt. Interest on
borrowings under our credit facility is based on a floating
rate, dependent in part on the LIBOR rate, exposing us to the
effects of interest rate changes. The objective of the hedge is
to eliminate the variability of cash flows in interest payments
for forecasted floating rate debt, attributable to changes in
benchmark LIBOR interest rates. The changes in the cash flows of
the interest rate swap are expected to offset the changes in the
cash flows (e.g., changes in the forecasted interest rate
payments) attributable to fluctuations in benchmark LIBOR
interest rates for forecasted floating rate debt.
To support hedge accounting, we designate floating-to-fixed
interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of the variability of
future cash flows at the inception of the swap contract. In
accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, the fair
value of the Companys outstanding hedges is recorded as an
asset or liability on the consolidated balance sheet.
Ineffectiveness is measured quarterly based on the
hypothetical derivative method from Implementation
Issue G7, Measuring the Ineffectiveness of a Cash Flow Hedge
of Interest Rate Risk under Paragraph 30(b) When the
Shortcut Method Is Not Applied. Accordingly, the calculation
of ineffectiveness involves a comparison of the fair value of
the interest rate swap and the fair value of a hypothetical
swap, which has terms that are identical to the hedged item. To
the extent the change in the mark-to-market on the hedge is
equal to or less than the change in the mark-to-market on the
hypothetical derivative, then the entire change is recorded in
Other Comprehensive Income. If the change is greater, the
ineffective portion will be recognized immediately in income.
The amount charged to Other comprehensive income for 2007
was $0.9 million. Derivative liabilities, totaling
$1.4 million, were recorded as Other current liabilities
on the Statements of Consolidated Financial Position at
December 31, 2007. There was no hedge ineffectiveness for
interest rate swaps in 2007.
F-10
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Inventories:
The following table is a summary of our Inventory on the
Statements of Consolidated Financial Position at
December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Finished
|
|
|
Work-in
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Finished
|
|
|
Work-in
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Goods
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
Goods
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
114.3
|
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
|
$
|
130.8
|
|
|
$
|
129.5
|
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
$
|
143.5
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
|
|
|
102.0
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
152.8
|
|
|
$
|
89.1
|
|
|
$
|
241.9
|
|
|
$
|
150.3
|
|
|
$
|
50.6
|
|
|
$
|
200.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
American Iron Ore
North American Iron Ore product inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market. Cost of iron ore inventories is
determined using the LIFO method. The excess of current cost
over LIFO cost of iron ore inventories was $58.4 million
and $60.4 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. During 2007 and 2005, the inventory balances
declined resulting in liquidation of LIFO layers; the effect of
the inventory reduction decreased Cost of goods sold and
operating expenses by $0.1 million and
$0.9 million, respectively. There was no liquidation of
LIFO layers in 2006. We had approximately 0.8 million tons
stored at ports on the lower Great Lakes to service customers at
both December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We maintain
ownership of the inventories until title has transferred to the
customer, usually when payment is made. Maintaining iron ore
products at ports on the lower Great Lakes reduces risk of
non-payment by customers, as we retain title to the product
until payment is received from the customer. It also assists the
customers by more closely relating the timing of the
customers payments for the product to the customers
consumption of the products and by providing a portion of the
three-month supply of inventories of iron ore the customers
require during the winter when product shipments are curtailed
over the Great Lakes. We track the movement of the inventory and
verify the quantities on hand.
North
American Coal
At acquisition, the fair value of PinnOaks inventory was
determined utilizing estimated selling price less costs to sell.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost of
coal inventories includes labor, supplies and operating overhead
and related costs and is calculated using the average production
cost. We maintain ownership until coal is loaded into rail cars
at the mine for domestic sales and until loaded in the vessels
at the terminal for export sales.
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore product inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market. Costs, including an appropriate portion
of fixed and variable overhead expenses, are assigned to the
inventory on hand by the method most appropriate to each
particular class of inventory, with the majority being valued on
a weighted average basis. We maintain ownership of the
inventories until title has transferred to the customer at the
F.O.B. point, which is generally when the product is loaded into
the vessel.
Iron Ore and Coal Reserves: We review iron ore
and coal reserves based on current expectations of revenues and
costs, which are subject to change. Iron ore and coal reserves
include only proven and probable quantities which can be
economically and legally mined and processed utilizing existing
technology. Asset retirement obligations reflect remaining
economic reserves.
F-11
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Properties:
North
American Iron Ore
North American Iron Ore properties are stated at cost.
Depreciation of plant and equipment is computed principally by
the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives, not to
exceed the estimated economic iron ore reserves. Depreciation is
provided over the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Class
|
|
Basis
|
|
Life
|
|
Buildings
|
|
Straight line
|
|
45 Years
|
Mining equipment
|
|
Straight line
|
|
10 to 20 Years
|
Processing equipment
|
|
Straight line
|
|
15 to 45 Years
|
Information technology
|
|
Straight line
|
|
2 to 7 Years
|
Depreciation is not curtailed when operations are temporarily
idled.
North
American Coal
North American Coal properties were valued under purchase
accounting using the cost approach as the primary method for
valuing the majority of the personal property. The cost approach
recognizes that a prudent investor would not ordinarily pay more
for an asset than the cost to reproduce or replace it new, using
the same materials, construction standards, design, layout and
quality of workmanship and embodying all the assets
deficiencies, super adequacies and obsolescence. Depreciation is
provided over the estimated useful lives, not to exceed the mine
lives and is calculated by the straight-line method.
Depreciation is provided over the following estimated useful
lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Class
|
|
Basis
|
|
Life
|
|
Buildings
|
|
Straight line
|
|
30 Years
|
Mining equipment
|
|
Straight line
|
|
2 to 12 Years
|
Processing equipment
|
|
Straight line
|
|
2 to 10 Years
|
Information technology
|
|
Straight line
|
|
2 to 3 Years
|
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Our Asia-Pacific Iron Ore properties were valued under purchase
accounting using the depreciated replacement cost approach as
the primary valuation methodology. This method was utilized as
it recognizes the value of specialized equipment and
improvements as part of an ongoing business. When assessing the
depreciated replacement cost of an asset, the expected remaining
useful life was determined based on the shorter of the estimated
remaining life of the asset and the life of the mine.
Depreciation at Portman is calculated by the straight-line
method or production output basis provided over the following
estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Class
|
|
Basis
|
|
Life
|
|
Plant and equipment
|
|
Straight line
|
|
5 -13 Years
|
Plant and equipment and mine assets
|
|
Production output
|
|
12 Years
|
Motor vehicles, furniture & equipment
|
|
Straight line
|
|
3 - 5 Years
|
F-12
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table indicates the value of each of the major
classes of our consolidated depreciable assets as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Land rights and mineral rights
|
|
$
|
1,174.3
|
|
|
$
|
469.2
|
|
Office and information technology
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
57.3
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
Mining equipment
|
|
|
221.1
|
|
|
|
101.0
|
|
Processing equipment
|
|
|
244.0
|
|
|
|
214.8
|
|
Railroad equipment
|
|
|
103.3
|
|
|
|
96.4
|
|
Electric power facilities
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
Port facilities
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
Interest capitalized during construction
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
Land improvements
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
123.2
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,154.8
|
|
|
|
1,107.3
|
|
Allowance for depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
(330.9
|
)
|
|
|
(222.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,823.9
|
|
|
$
|
884.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense and amortization of capitalized interest
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
$
|
69.3
|
|
|
$
|
42.7
|
|
|
$
|
32.7
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
The costs capitalized and classified as Land rights and
mineral rights represent lands where we own the surface
and/or
mineral rights. The value of the land rights is split between
surface only, surface and minerals, and minerals only.
Our North American Coal operation leases coal mining rights from
a third party through lease agreements that extend through the
earlier of July 1, 2023 or until all merchantable and
mineable coal has been extracted. Our interest in coal reserves
and resources was valued using a discounted cash flow method.
Fair value was estimated based upon present value of the
expected future cash flows from coal operations over the life of
the mineral leases.
Our Asia-Pacific Iron Ore operations interest in iron ore
reserves and resources was valued using a discounted cash flow
method. Fair value was estimated based upon the present value of
the expected future cash flows from iron ore operations over the
economic lives of the mines.
The net book value of the land rights and mineral rights is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Land rights
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral rights:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
1,157.7
|
|
|
|
464.3
|
|
Less depletion
|
|
|
97.3
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net mineral rights
|
|
$
|
1,060.4
|
|
|
$
|
412.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Accumulated depletion relating to mineral rights, which was
recorded using the unit-of-production method, is included in
Allowances for depreciation and depletion.
Asset held for sale: We consider businesses to
be held for sale when management approves and commits to a
formal plan to actively market a business for sale. Upon
designation as held for sale, the carrying value of assets of
the business are recorded at the lower of their carrying value
or their estimated fair value, less costs to sell. The Company
ceases to record depreciation expense at that time.
Goodwill: Based on our final purchase price
allocation for our Portman acquisition, we identified
$8.4 million of excess purchase price over the fair value
of assets acquired. At December 31, 2007 the amount of
goodwill recorded on the Statements of Consolidated Financial
Position related to Portman was $9.7 million. The increase
is attributable to foreign exchange rate changes. Goodwill also
includes $2.1 million related to our acquisition of
Northshore in 1994.
As required by SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, goodwill related to Portman was allocated to the
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore segment and goodwill related to Northshore
was allocated to the North American Iron Ore segment.
SFAS 142 requires us to compare the fair value of the
reporting unit to its carrying value on an annual basis to
determine if there is potential goodwill impairment. If the fair
value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an
impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of
the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than the carrying
value of its goodwill.
We evaluate goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter each
year. In addition to the annual impairment test required under
SFAS 142, we assessed whether events or circumstances
occurred that potentially indicate that the carrying amount of
these assets may not be recoverable. We concluded that there
were no such events or changes in circumstances during 2007 and
2006, and determined that the fair value of reporting units was
in excess of our carrying value as of December 31, 2007 and
2006. Consequently, no goodwill impairment charges were recorded
in either year.
Preferred Stock: In January 2004, we issued
172,500 shares of redeemable cumulative convertible
perpetual preferred stock, without par value, issued at $1,000
per share. The preferred stock pays quarterly cash dividends at
a rate of 3.25 percent per annum and can be converted into
our common shares at an adjusted rate of 133.0646 common
shares per share of preferred stock. The preferred stock is
classified as temporary equity reflecting certain
provisions of the agreement that could, under remote
circumstances, require us to redeem the preferred stock for
cash. See NOTE 10 PREFERRED STOCK for
more information.
Asset Impairment: We monitor conditions that
may affect the carrying value of our long-lived and intangible
assets when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of the assets may be impaired. We determine impairment
based on the assets ability to generate cash flow greater
than the carrying value of the asset, using an undiscounted
probability-weighted analysis. If projected undiscounted cash
flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, the asset
is adjusted to its fair value.
Repairs and Maintenance: Repairs, maintenance
and replacement of components are expensed as incurred. The cost
of major power plant overhauls is deferred and amortized over
the estimated useful life, which is the period until the next
scheduled overhaul, generally five years. All other planned and
unplanned repairs and maintenance costs are expensed when
incurred.
Insurance Recoveries: Potential insurance
recoveries can relate to property damage, business interruption
(including profit recovery) and expenditures to mitigate loss.
We account for insurance recoveries under the guidelines
established by SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies
and
EITF 01-10,
Accounting for the Impact of the Terrorist Attacks of
September 11, 2001, which indicate that the proceeds
from property damage insurance claims are to be recognized only
when realization of the claim is probable and only to the extent
of loss recoveries. Insurance recoveries that result in a gain,
and proceeds from business interruption insurance are recognized
when realized in Casualty recoveries in the Statements of
Consolidated Operations.
F-14
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits: We
offer defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution
pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans, primarily
consisting of retiree healthcare benefits, to most employees in
North America as part of a total compensation and benefits
program. This includes employees of PinnOak, who became
employees of Cliffs through the July 2007 acquisition. We do not
have employee retirement benefit obligations at our Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore operations.
Under the provisions of SFAS 158 Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R), (effective December 31, 2006), we
recognized the funded status of our postretirement benefit
obligations on our December 31, 2007 Statement of
Consolidated Financial Position based on the market value of
plan assets and the actuarial present value of our retirement
obligations on that date. On a
plan-by-plan
basis, we determine if the plan assets exceed the benefit
obligations or vice-versa. If the plan assets exceed the
retirement obligations, the amount of the surplus is recorded as
an asset; if the retirement obligations exceed the plan assets,
the amount of the underfunded obligations are recorded as a
liability. Year-end balance sheet adjustments to postretirement
assets and obligations are charged to other comprehensive income.
The market value of plan assets is measured at the year-end
balance sheet date. The PBO is determined based upon an
actuarial estimate of the present value of pension benefits to
be paid to current employees and retirees. The APBO represents
an actuarial estimate of the present value of OPEB benefits to
be paid to current employees and retirees.
The actuarial estimates of the PBO and APBO retirement
obligations incorporate various assumptions including the
discount rates, the rates of increases in compensation,
healthcare cost trend rates, mortality, retirement timing and
employee turnover. The discount rate is determined based on the
prevailing year-end rates for high-grade corporate bonds with a
duration matching the expected cash flow timing of the benefit
payments from the various plans. The remaining assumptions are
based on our estimate of future events incorporating historical
trends and future expectations.
The amount of net periodic cost that is recorded in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations consists of several
components including service cost, interest cost, expected
return on plan assets, and amortization of previously
unrecognized amounts. Service cost represents the value of the
benefits earned in the current year by the participants.
Interest cost represents the cost associated with the passage of
time. In addition, the net periodic cost is affected by the
anticipated income from the return on invested assets, as well
as the income or expense resulting from the recognition of
previously deferred items. Certain items, such as plan
amendments, gains
and/or
losses resulting from differences between actual and assumed
results for demographic and economic factors affecting the
obligations and assets of the plans, and changes in plan
assumptions are subject to deferred recognition for income and
expense purposes. The expected return on plan assets is
determined utilizing the weighted average of expected returns
for plan asset investments in various asset categories based on
historical performance, adjusted for current trends. See
NOTE 8 RETIREMENT RELATED BENEFITS
for further information.
Income Taxes: Income taxes are based on income
for financial reporting purposes and reflect a current tax
liability for the estimated taxes payable for all open tax years
and changes in deferred taxes. In evaluating any exposures
associated with our various tax filing positions, we record
liabilities for exposures where a position taken has not met a
more-likely-than-not threshold. Deferred tax assets or
liabilities are determined based on differences between
financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and
are measured using enacted tax laws and rates. A valuation
allowance is provided on deferred tax assets if it is determined
that it is more-likely-than-not that the asset will not be
realized.
On January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48
prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken
(or expected to be taken) in a tax return. This interpretation
also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax assets and
liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax
F-15
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties
associated with tax positions, accounting for income taxes in
interim periods and income tax disclosures.
The effects of applying this Interpretation resulted in a
decrease of $7.7 million to retained earnings as of
January 1, 2007. At December 31, 2007, we had
$15.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits recorded in
Other liabilities on the Statements of Consolidated
Financial Position, of which $15.2 million, if recognized,
would impact the effective tax rate. We recognize potential
accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2007, we
had $11.0 million of accrued interest relating to
unrecognized tax benefits. See NOTE 9 INCOME
TAXES.
Environmental Remediation Costs: We have a
formal policy for environmental protection and restoration. Our
mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws
and regulations governing protection of the environment. We
conduct our operations to protect the public health and
environment and believe our operations are in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations in all material respects. Our
environmental liabilities, including obligations for known
environmental remediation exposures at active and closed mining
operations and other sites, have been recognized based on the
estimated cost of investigation and remediation at each site. If
the cost can only be estimated as a range of possible amounts
with no specific amount being most likely, the minimum of the
range is accrued in accordance with SFAS 5. Future
expenditures are not discounted unless the amount and timing of
the cash disbursements are readily known. Additional
environmental obligations could be incurred, the extent of which
cannot be assessed. Potential insurance recoveries have not been
reflected in the determination of the liabilities. See
NOTE 5 ENVIRONMENTAL AND MINE CLOSURE
OBLIGATIONS.
Share-Based Compensation: Effective
January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment using
the modified prospective transition method. Because we elected
to use the modified prospective transition method, results for
prior periods have not been restated. Under this transition
method, share-based compensation expense for 2006 included
compensation expense for all share-based compensation awards
granted prior to January 1, 2006 based on the grant date
estimated fair value, which are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over the remaining service periods of the
awards.
Effective January 1, 2006, we made a one-time election to
adopt the transition method described in FSP
No. FAS 123(R)-3, Transition Election Related to
Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards.
This election resulted in the reclassification of excess tax
benefits as presented in the Statements of Consolidated Cash
Flows, from operating activities to financing activities.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, we recognized
share-based compensation expense in accordance with
SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
As prescribed in SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure
(SFAS 148), we elected to use the prospective method.
The prospective method required expense to be recognized for all
awards granted, modified or settled beginning in the year of
adoption. In accordance with SFAS 123 and SFAS 148, we
provided pro forma net income or loss and net income or loss per
share disclosures for each period as if we had applied the fair
value recognition provisions to all awards unvested in each
period.
In March 2005, the SEC issued SAB 107, which provided
supplemental implementation guidance for SFAS 123R. We have
applied the provisions of SAB 107 in our adoption of
SFAS 123R. See NOTE 11 STOCK PLANS
for information on the impact of our adoption of
SFAS 123R and the assumptions we used to calculate the fair
value of share-based compensation.
Capitalized Stripping Costs: Stripping costs
during the development of a mine (before production begins) are
capitalized as a part of the depreciable cost of building,
developing and constructing a mine. These capitalized costs are
amortized over the productive life of the mine using the units
of production method. The productive phase of a mine is deemed
to have begun when saleable minerals are extracted (produced)
from an ore body, regardless of the level of production. The
production phase does not commence with the removal of
de minimus saleable mineral material that occurs in
conjunction with the removal of overburden or waste material for
purposes of obtaining
F-16
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
access to an ore body. The stripping costs incurred in the
production phase of a mine are variable production costs
included in the costs of the inventory produced (extracted)
during the period that the stripping costs are incurred.
Stripping costs related to an expansion of a mining asset of
proven and probable reserves are variable production costs that
are included in the costs of the inventory produced during the
period that the stripping costs are incurred.
Stripping costs related to an expansion of a mining asset beyond
the value attributable to proven and probable reserves are
capitalized as part of the expansion and amortized over the
productive life of the mine using the units of production method.
Earnings Per Share: We present both basic and
diluted EPS amounts. Basic EPS are calculated by dividing income
applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period presented. Diluted
EPS are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares, common share equivalents and
convertible preferred stock outstanding during the period,
utilizing the treasury share method for employee stock plans.
Common share equivalents are excluded from EPS computations in
the periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect. See
NOTE 15 EARNINGS PER SHARE.
New
Accounting Standards:
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51. This Statement
amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards
for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest
in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in
the consolidated financial statements. This Statement is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
Earlier adoption is prohibited. We are evaluating the impact of
this Statement on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations. This Statement
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in
a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial
statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the
acquisition date fair value. SFAS 141R determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is
not permitted.
In December 2007, the EITF ratified Issue
No. 07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements,
(EITF 07-1).
The Issue defines collaborative arrangements and establishes
reporting requirements for transactions between participants in
a collaborative arrangement and between participants in the
arrangement and third parties. The ratification of EITF is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are
evaluating the impact of this Issue on our consolidated
financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities Including
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This Statement
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value. The Statement also
establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to
facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. The Statement is effective as of the beginning of
an entitys first fiscal year that begins after
November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted. We do not
expect adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
F-17
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157,
Accounting for Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157
clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the
assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset
or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions.
Under the standard, fair value measurements would be separately
disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy.
SFAS 157 is effective for financial assets and liabilities,
as well as for any other assets and liabilities that are carried
at fair value on a recurring basis in financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim
periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption
permitted. The FASB provided a one-year deferral for the
implementation of SFAS 157 for other non-financial assets
and liabilities. We do not expect adoption of this Statement to
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
On March 17, 2005, the EITF reached consensus on Issue
No. 04-6,
Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in
the Mining Industry,
(EITF 04-6).
The consensus clarified that stripping costs incurred during the
production phase of a mine are variable production costs that
should be included in the cost of inventory. The consensus,
which was effective for reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2005, permitted early adoption. At its
June 29, 2005 meeting, FASB ratified a modification to
EITF 04-6
to clarify that the term inventory produced means
inventory extracted. We elected to adopt
EITF 04-6
in 2005. As a result, we recorded an after-tax cumulative effect
adjustment of $5.2 million or $.09 per diluted share, and
increased product inventory by $8.0 million effective
January 1, 2005.
NOTE 2
ACQUISITIONS & OTHER INVESTMENTS
PinnOak
On July 31, 2007, we completed our acquisition of
100 percent of PinnOak, a privately-owned United States
producer of high-quality, low-volatile metallurgical coal. The
acquisition furthers our growth strategy and expands our
diversification of products for the integrated steel industry.
The purchase price of PinnOak and its subsidiary operating
companies was $450 million in cash, of which
$108.4 million is deferred until December 31, 2009,
plus the assumption of approximately $160 million in debt,
which was repaid at closing. The deferred payment was discounted
using a six percent credit-adjusted risk free rate and was
recorded as $93.7 million of Deferred payment on the
Statements of Consolidated Financial Position as of
July 31, 2007. The purchase agreement also includes a
contingent earn-out, which ranges from $0 to approximately
$300 million dependent upon PinnOaks performance in
2008 and 2009. The earn-out, if any, would be payable in 2010
and treated as additional purchase price. The assets acquired
consist primarily of coal mining rights and mining equipment and
are included in our North American Coal segment.
A portion of the purchase price for the acquisition was financed
through both our Credit Agreement, dated June 23, 2006 and
the subsequent Credit Agreement dated July 26, 2007. See
NOTE 4 DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITY for further
information.
PinnOaks operations include two complexes comprising three
underground mines the Pinnacle and Green Ridge mines
in southern West Virginia and the Oak Grove mine near
Birmingham, Alabama. Combined, the mines have rated capacity to
produce 6.5 million tons of premium-quality metallurgical
coal annually.
The Statements of Consolidated Financial Position of the Company
as of December 31, 2007 reflect the acquisition of PinnOak,
effective July 31, 2007, under the purchase method of
accounting. The total cost of the acquisition has been allocated
to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based upon
their estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. The
preliminary allocation resulted in an excess of fair value of
acquired net assets over cost. As the acquisition involved a
contingent earn-out, a liability has been recorded totaling
$99.5 million, representing the lesser of the maximum
amount of contingent consideration or the excess prior to the
pro rata allocation of purchase price. The estimated purchase
price allocation is preliminary and is subject to revision.
Additional valuation work is being conducted on mineral rights,
liability for black lung, property, plant and equipment and real
estate values. A valuation of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed is being conducted and
F-18
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the final allocation will be made when completed. The following
represents the preliminary allocation and revisions of the
aggregate purchase price as of July 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
76.0
|
|
|
$
|
77.2
|
|
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
149.5
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
Mineral rights
|
|
|
607.7
|
|
|
|
619.9
|
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
Asset held for sale
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
850.8
|
|
|
$
|
833.7
|
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
63.2
|
|
|
$
|
61.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
186.4
|
|
|
|
171.2
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
249.6
|
|
|
|
232.5
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
601.2
|
|
|
$
|
601.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjustment since our initial allocation reduced coal
inventory by $1.1 million to reflect inventory survey
adjustments, increased property, plant and equipment by
$16.5 million and reduced mineral rights by
$12.2 million to reflect market-based valuation
adjustments. The asset held for sale represents the estimated
fair value less cost to sell of the Beard-Pinnacle business, a
pond fines recovery operation. The sale was completed on
February 15, 2008. The increase in current liabilities
reflects additional accruals for non-income taxes. The increase
in long-term liabilities represents an increase in deferred tax
liabilities resulting from further assessment of the purchase
price for tax purposes.
The following unaudited pro forma information summarizes the
results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007
and December 31, 2006, as if the PinnOak acquisition had
been completed as of the beginning of each period presented. The
pro forma information gives effect to actual operating results
prior to the acquisition. Adjustments made to cost of goods sold
for depletion, inventory effects and depreciation for mining
equipment, reflecting the preliminary allocation of purchase
price to coal mining reserves, inventory and plant and
equipment, interest expense and income taxes related to the
acquisition, are reflected in the pro forma information. These
pro forma amounts do not purport to be indicative of the results
that would have actually been obtained if the acquisition had
occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented or that
may be obtained in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
|
per common share)
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
2,428.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,176.5
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
252.2
|
|
|
|
245.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
252.2
|
|
|
$
|
245.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share Basic
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
$
|
2.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Amapá
On March 5, 2007, we acquired a 30 percent interest in
the Amapá Project, a Brazilian iron ore project, through
the acquisition of 100 percent of the shares of Centennial
Amapá for approximately $133 million. The remaining
70 percent of the Amapá Project is currently owned by
MMX, which is managing the construction and operations of the
Amapá Project while we are supplying supplemental technical
support.
The Amapá Project consists of a significant iron ore
deposit, a
192-kilometer
railway connecting the mine location to an existing port
facility and 71 hectares of real estate on the banks of the
Amazon River, reserved for a loading terminal. The Amapá
Project began production of sinter fines in late-December 2007.
It is expected that completion of construction of the
concentrator and ramp up of production will occur in 2008. Once
fully operational, production is targeted at 6.5 million
tonnes of fines products annually.
In January 2008, Anglo American plc entered into a period of
exclusive discussions with the controlling shareholder of MMX to
purchase controlling interest in 51 percent interest in the
Minos-Rio iron ore project and its 70 percent interest in
the Amapá Project. The proposed transaction is subject to a
number of terms and conditions, including MMX board and
regulatory approvals and the negotiation of definitive
transaction documents. In addition, MMX will be required to
obtain security holder approval for the completion of the
transaction.
Total project funding requirements are estimated to be between
$550 million and $650 million (Company share
$165 million to $195 million), including approximately
$415 million to $490 million (Company share
$125 million to $147 million) to be funded with
project debt, and approximately $135 million to
$160 million (Company share $40 million to
$48 million) to be funded with equity contributions. As of
December 31, 2007, Amapá had debt outstanding of
approximately $419 million, with approximately
$83 million representing loans from MMX. These loans will
be converted to permanent financing under existing third party
credit facilities during 2008. We are committed to funding
30 percent of the equity contributions and have guaranteed
30 percent of the third party project level debt until the
project meets certain performance criteria. As of
December 31, 2007, approximately $101 million of
project debt was guaranteed by Cliffs. Capital contributions
through December 31, 2007 have totaled approximately
$89 million (Company share $26.7 million). Amapá
was in compliance with its debt covenant requirements at
December 31, 2007.
Sonoma
On April 18, 2007, we executed agreements to participate in
Sonoma, a coking and thermal coal project located in Queensland,
Australia. As of December 31, 2007, we invested
$120.1 million to acquire and develop mining tenements and
related infrastructure including the construction of a
washplant, which will produce coal to meet the growing global
demand. Our total investment in Sonoma is estimated to be
$127.7 million. Immediately preceding Cliffs
investment in the Sonoma Project, QCoal owned exploration
permits and applications for mining leases for the real estate
that is involved in the Sonoma Project (Mining
Assets); however, development of the Mining Assets
requires significant infrastructure including the construction
of a rail loop and related equipment (Non-Mining
Assets) and a facility that prepares the extracted coal
for sale (the Washplant). Pursuant to a combination
of interrelated agreements creating a structure whereby we own
100 percent of the Washplant, 8.33 percent of the
Mining Assets and 45 percent of the Non-Mining Assets of
Sonoma, we obtained a 45 percent economic interest in the
collective operations of Sonoma. The following substantive legal
entities exist within the Sonoma structure:
|
|
|
|
|
CAC, a wholly owned Cliffs subsidiary, is the conduit for
Cliffs investment in Sonoma.
|
|
|
|
CAWO, a wholly owned subsidiary of CAC, owns the Washplant and
receives 40 percent of Sonoma coal production in exchange
for providing coal washing services to the remaining Sonoma
participants.
|
|
|
|
SMM is the appointed operator of the mine assets, non-mine
assets, and the Washplant. We own a 45 percent interest in
SMM.
|
F-20
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Sonoma Sales, a wholly owned subsidiary of QCoal, is the sales
agent for the participants of the coal extracted and processed
in the Sonoma Project.
|
The objective of Sonoma is to mine and process coking and
thermal coal for the benefit of the participants.
Pursuant to the terms of the agreements that comprise the Sonoma
Project, Cliffs through CAC:
|
|
|
|
|
Paid $34.9 million of the total estimated cost of
$37.6 million for an 8.33 percent undivided interest
in the Mining Assets and a 45 percent undivided interest in
the Non-Mining Assets and other expenditures, and
|
|
|
|
Paid $85.2 million of the total estimated cost of
$90.1 million to construct the Washplant for a total
investment of approximately $127.7 million.
|
While the individual components of our investment are
disproportionate to the overall economics of the investment, the
total investment is the same as if we had acquired a
45 percent interest in the Mining Assets and had committed
to funding 45 percent of the cost of developing the
Non-Mining Assets and the Washplant.
The Washplant is currently undergoing commissioning and the
extraction of coal from the Sonoma Project began in December
2007.
These legal entities were evaluated for consolidation under
FIN 46R:
CAWO CAC owns 100 percent of the legal equity
in CAWO; however, CAC is limited in its ability to make
significant decisions about CAWO because the significant
decisions are made by, or subject to approval of, the Operating
Committee of the Sonoma Project, of which CAC is only entitled
to 45 percent of the vote. As a result, we determined that
CAWO is a VIE and that CAC should consolidate CAWO as the
primary beneficiary because it absorbs greater than
50 percent of the residual returns and expected losses.
Sonoma Sales Cliffs, including its related parties,
does not have voting rights with respect to Sonoma Sales and is
not party to any contracts that represent significant variable
interests in Sonoma Sales. Therefore, even if Sonoma Sales were
a variable interest entity, we determined that we are not the
primary beneficiary and therefore would not consolidate Sonoma
Sales.
SMM SMM does not have sufficient equity at risk and
is therefore a VIE under FIN 46R. Cliffs, through CAC, has
a 45 percent voting interest in SMM and a contractual
requirement to reimburse SMM for 45 percent of the costs
that it incurs in connection with managing the Sonoma Project.
However, Cliffs, including its related parties, does not have
any contracts that would cause it to absorb greater than
50 percent of SMMs expected losses and therefore is
not considered to be the primary beneficiary of SMM. Thus, we
account for our investment in SMM in accordance with the equity
method rather than consolidate the entity. The effect of SMM on
our financial statements is expected to be minimal since we paid
a nominal amount for our interest in SMM and it is not expected
to have net income.
Mining and Non-Mining Assets Since we have an
undivided interest in these assets and Sonoma is in an
extractive industry, we have pro rata consolidated our share of
these assets and costs in accordance with
EITF 00-1.
Mining operations reached a milestone in December 2007, when the
first coal was extracted from the mine. The Washplant is
currently undergoing commissioning and is expected to be fully
operational by the end of the first quarter of 2008. Severe
flooding at the mine in mid-February 2008 has caused a delay in
previously scheduled shipments. Incorporating the effects of the
flooding, we expect total production of two million tonnes for
2008 and three to four million tonnes annually in 2009 and
beyond. Production will include a equal mix of hard coking coal
and thermal coal.
We have entered into arrangements with providers of credit
facilities to guarantee our 45 percent share of certain
Sonoma performance requirements relating to environmental
compliance and take-or-pay provisions of port and rail
contracts. At December 31, 2007, our 45 percent of
such guarantees amounted to $9.5 million.
F-21
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
NOTE 3
RELATED PARTIES
We co-own five of our six North American iron ore mines with
various joint venture partners that are integrated steel
producers or their subsidiaries. We are the manager of each of
the mines we co-own and rely on our joint venture partners to
make their required capital contributions and to pay for their
share of the iron ore pellets we produce. The joint venture
partners are also our customers.
The following is a summary of the mine ownership of these five
North American iron ore mines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Ownership
|
|
|
|
Cleveland-
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Steel
|
|
|
|
|
Mine
|
|
Cliffs Inc
|
|
|
ArcelorMittal
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Laiwu
|
|
|
Empire
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tilden
|
|
|
85.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hibbing
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Taconite
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
Wabush
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
ArcelorMittal has a unilateral right to put its interest in the
Empire mine to us at the end of 2007. This right has not been
exercised.
On June 6, 2007, Consolidated Thompson Iron Mines Ltd. made
a conditional offer to acquire the 71.4 percent of Wabush
owned directly or indirectly by the Company (26.8 percent)
and U.S. Steel Canada (44.6 percent) for cash plus
warrants for the purchase of CLM common shares and the
assumption by CLM of employee and asset retirement obligations.
The offer was non-binding upon the Company and U.S. Steel
Canada except for the grant to CLM of limited exclusivity and
was conditional upon various matters including the negotiation
and finalization of the definitive agreement and the Dofasco
right of first refusal referred to below.
As part of the transaction, if completed, we would enter into an
agreement whereby CLM would sell a pro rata share to us annually
from 4.8 million tons of expected annual Wabush production
from the date of the closing through December 31, 2009.
Dofasco, a subsidiary of ArcelorMittal, holds the remaining
28.6 percent of Wabush. The notification to Dofasco of the
conditional acceptance of CLMs offer by the Company and
U.S. Steel Canada on June 8, 2007, triggered a
90-day right
of first refusal option by Dofasco under terms of the joint
venture agreement.
On August 30, 2007, Dofasco provided notice to the Company
and U.S. Steel Canada that it was exercising its right of
first refusal to purchase the Companys and U.S. Steel
Canadas interest in the Wabush Mines Joint Venture.
Negotiations have not been finalized and it is possible that the
transaction may not be consummated.
Product revenues to related parties were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Product revenues to related parties
|
|
$
|
754.3
|
|
|
$
|
649.2
|
|
|
$
|
704.0
|
|
Total product revenues
|
|
|
1,997.3
|
|
|
|
1,669.1
|
|
|
|
1,512.2
|
|
Related party product revenue as a percent of total product
revenue
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|
|
38.9
|
%
|
|
|
46.6
|
%
|
Accounts receivable from related parties were $11.1 million
and $2.7 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
In 2002, we entered into an agreement with Ispat that
restructured the ownership of the Empire mine and increased our
ownership from 46.7 percent to 79 percent in exchange
for assumption of all mine liabilities. Under the terms of the
agreement, we indemnified Ispat from obligations of Empire in
exchange for certain future
F-22
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
payments to Empire and to us by Ispat of $120.0 million,
recorded at a present value of $49.4 million at
December 31, 2007 ($54.9 million at December 31,
2006) with $37.4 million classified as Long-term
receivable with the balance current, over the
12-year life
of the supply agreement.
Supply agreements with one of our customers include provisions
for supplemental revenue or refunds based on the customers
annual steel pricing for the year the product is consumed in the
customers blast furnace. The supplemental pricing is
characterized as an embedded derivative. See Derivative
Financial Instruments in NOTE 1 for further information.
NOTE 4
SEGMENT REPORTING
As a result of the PinnOak acquisition, our operating segments
have changed. Our company is organized and managed according to
product category and geographic location: North American Iron
Ore, North American Coal, Asia-Pacific Iron Ore, Asia-Pacific
Coal and Latin American Iron Ore. The North American Iron Ore
segment is comprised of our interests in six North American
mines which provide iron ore to the integrated steel industry.
The North American Coal segment, comprised of PinnOak, which was
acquired on July 31, 2007, provides metallurgical coal to
the integrated steel industry. The Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
segment, comprised of our interests in Portman is located in
Western Australia and provides iron ore to steel producers in
China and Japan. There are no intersegment revenues.
The Asia-Pacific Coal operating segment is comprised of our
45 percent economic interest in the Sonoma Coal Project in
Queensland, Australia, which is in the development stage. The
Latin American Iron Ore operating segment is comprised of our
30 percent Amapá interest in Brazil, which is
also in the development stage. As a result, the Asia-Pacific
Coal and Latin American Iron Ore operating segments do not meet
reportable segment disclosure requirements and therefore are not
separately reported.
In the past, we have evaluated segment results based on segment
operating income. As a result of the PinnOak acquisition and our
focus on reducing production costs, we now evaluate segment
performance based on sales margin, defined as revenues less cost
of goods sold identifiable to each segment. This measure of
operating performance is an effective measurement as we continue
to focus on reducing production costs throughout the Company.
F-23
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents a summary of our reportable
segments for 2007, 2006 and 2005. A reconciliation of segment
sales margin to income from continuing operations before income
taxes, minority interest and equity loss from ventures is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales and services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
1,745.4
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,560.7
|
|
|
|
81.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,535.0
|
|
|
|
88.2
|
%
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
85.2
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
444.6
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
361.0
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
204.5
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues from product sales and services for reportable
segments
|
|
$
|
2,275.2
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,921.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,739.5
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
397.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
327.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
358.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
(31.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
95.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
|
462.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income (expense)
|
|
|
(80.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, minority
interest and equity loss from ventures
|
|
$
|
380.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
387.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
368.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$
|
107.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
73.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital additions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
64.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
80.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
120.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital additions
|
|
$
|
235.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
109.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
968.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,154.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,079.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
773.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
1,083.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
249.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,075.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,939.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,746.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Included in the consolidated financial statements are the
following amounts relating to geographic locations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenue(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,282.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,109.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,007.6
|
|
China
|
|
|
419.9
|
|
|
|
367.4
|
|
|
|
232.6
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
384.9
|
|
|
|
379.7
|
|
|
|
454.1
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
135.7
|
|
|
|
74.4
|
|
|
|
54.9
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
2,289.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,933.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,752.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
$
|
691.6
|
|
|
$
|
522.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
1,132.3
|
|
|
|
362.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
1,823.9
|
|
|
$
|
884.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenue is attributed to countries based on the location of the
customer and includes both Product sales and services and
Royalties and management fees. |
NOTE 5
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MINE CLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
We had environmental and mine closure liabilities of
$130.8 million and $103.9 million at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Payments in 2007 and 2006 were
$9.2 million and $15.6 million, respectively. The
obligations at December 31, 2007 and 2006 include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
Mine closure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore operating mines
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
LTVSMC
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Asia-Pacific Coal
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mine closure
|
|
|
118.5
|
|
|
|
90.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total environmental and mine closure obligations
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
103.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term environmental and mine closure obligations
|
|
$
|
123.2
|
|
|
$
|
95.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
Our mining and exploration activities are subject to various
laws and regulations governing the protection of the
environment. We conduct our operations to protect the public
health and environment and believe our operations are in
compliance with applicable laws and regulations in all material
respects. Our environmental liabilities of $12.3 million
and $13.0 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006
respectively, including obligations for known environmental
remediation exposures at active and closed mining operations and
other sites, have been recognized
F-25
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
based on the estimated cost of investigation and remediation at
each site. If the cost can only be estimated as a range of
possible amounts with no specific amount being most likely, the
minimum of the range is accrued in accordance with SFAS 5.
Future expenditures are not discounted unless the amount and
timing of the cash disbursements are readily known. Potential
insurance recoveries have not been reflected. Additional
environmental obligations could be incurred, the extent of which
cannot be assessed.
The environmental liability includes our obligations related to
four sites that are independent of our iron mining operations,
two former iron ore-related sites, two leased land sites where
we are lessor and miscellaneous remediation obligations at our
operating units. Three of these sites are Federal and State
sites where we are named as a PRP: the Rio Tinto mine site in
Nevada and the Kipling and Deer Lake sites in Michigan.
Milwaukee
Solvay Site
In September 2002, we received a draft of a proposed
Administrative Order by Consent from the EPA, for
clean-up and
reimbursement of costs associated with the Milwaukee Solvay coke
plant site in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The plant was operated from
1973 to 1983 by a company we acquired in 1986. In January 2003,
we completed the sale of the plant site and property to a third
party. Following this sale, we entered into an Administrative
Order by Consent (Solvay Consent Order) with the
EPA, the new owner and another third party who had operated on
the site. In connection with this order, the new owner agreed to
take responsibility for the removal action and agreed to
indemnify us for all costs and expenses in connection with the
removal action. In the third quarter of 2003, the new owner,
after completing a portion of the removal, experienced financial
difficulties. In an effort to continue progress on the removal
action, we expended $0.9 million in the second half of
2003, $2.1 million in 2004 and $0.4 million in 2005
secured by a mortgage on the property. In September 2005, we
received a notice of completion from the EPA documenting that
all work had been fully performed in accordance with the order.
In August 2004, we received a Request for Information regarding
the investigation of additional contamination below the ground
surface at the site. The Request for Information was also sent
to 13 other PRPs. In July 2005, we received a General Notice
Letter from the EPA notifying us that the agency believes we may
be liable and requesting that we, along with other PRPs,
voluntarily perform
clean-up
activities at the site. We have responded, indicating that there
had been no communications with other PRPs but that we were
willing to begin the negotiation process with the EPA and other
interested parties regarding a possible Consent Order.
Subsequently, in July 2005, the EPA submitted to us a proposed
Consent Order and informed us that three other PRPs had also
expressed interest in negotiating a possible Consent Order.
At this time, the nature and extent of the contamination, the
required remediation, the total cost of the
clean-up and
the cost sharing responsibilities of the PRPs cannot be
determined, although the EPA indicated that it incurred
$0.5 million in past response costs, which it will seek to
recover from us and the other PRPs. As a result, we increased
our environmental reserve for Milwaukee Solvay by
$0.5 million in 2005.
In August 2006, we sold our mortgage on the site to East
Greenfield. East Greenfield acquired the mortgage for the
assumption of all environmental obligations and a cash payment
of $2.25 million. In addition, East Greenfield deposited
$4.5 million into an escrow account to fund any remaining
environmental
clean-up
activities and to purchase insurance coverage with a
$5 million limit. In the third quarter of 2006, we reduced
our environmental reserve related to this site by
$2.7 million to reflect our reduced liability.
Subsequently, in December 2006, the Company and five other PRPs
entered an Administrative Settlement Agreement and AOC with the
EPA to conduct a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study and to
reimburse certain response costs incurred by EPA. In January
2007, the PRP Group, including Cliffs, entered into an AOC to
conduct a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study for the site,
to include surface, subsurface and sediment sampling. The PRP
Group has retained a consultant to conduct the site
investigation. Following a series of meetings with EPA and
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, a work plan for the
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study was drafted and
submitted to the EPA. Comments on the draft were received in
December with a final plan targeted for February 2008.
F-26
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Rio
Tinto Mine Site
The Rio Tinto Mine Site is a historic underground copper mine
located near Mountain City, Nevada, where tailings were placed
in Mill Creek, a tributary to the Owyhee River. Site
investigation and remediation work is being conducted in
accordance with a Consent Order between the NDEP and the RTWG
composed of Cliffs, Atlantic Richfield Company, Teck Cominco
American Incorporated, and E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.
The Consent Order provides for technical review by the
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs,
the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, the NDEP and
the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation
(collectively, Rio Tinto Trustees). The Consent
Order is currently projected to continue with the objective of
supporting the selection of the final remedy for the site. Costs
are shared pursuant to the terms of a Participation Agreement
between the parties of the RTWG, who have reserved the right to
renegotiate any future participation or cost sharing following
the completion of the Consent Order.
The Rio Tinto Trustees have made available for public comment
their plans for the assessment of NRD. The RTWG commented on the
plans and also are in discussions with the Rio Tinto Trustees
informally about those plans. The notice of plan availability is
a step in the damage assessment process. The studies presented
in the plan may lead to a NRD claim under CERCLA. There is no
monetized NRD claim at this time.
During 2006, the focus of the RTWG was on development of
alternatives for remediation of the mine site. A draft of an
alternatives study was reviewed with NDEP, the EPA and the Rio
Tinto Trustees and as of December 31, 2006, the
alternatives have essentially been reduced to two:
(1) tailings stabilization and long-term water treatment;
and (2) removal of the tailings. The estimated costs range
from approximately $10 million to $27 million. In
recognition of the potential for an NRD claim, the parties are
actively pursuing a global settlement, that would include the
EPA and encompass both the remedial action and the NRD issues.
We increased our reserve by $4.1 million in the third
quarter of 2006 to reflect our estimated costs for completing
the work under the existing Consent Order and our share of the
eventual remediation costs based on a consideration of the
various remedial measures and related cost estimates, which are
currently under review. The expense was included in Selling,
general and administrative in the Statements of Consolidated
Operations.
During 2007 a number of meetings were held with the NDEP, the
EPA, and the Rio Tinto Trustees (collectively, RTAG)
regarding the remedial alternatives. Following a number of
studies undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of a modified
alternative for removal of the tailings, it was suggested that
this could be the basis for a global settlement,
incorporating both site remediation and potential NRD claims.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, initial positions for a
global settlement were exchanged between RTWG and RTAG. A
mediation of cost allocation among the RTWG parties has been
scheduled for the second quarter of 2008.
Kipling
Furnace Site
In November 1991, the MDEQ notified us that it believed we were
liable for contamination at the Kipling Furnace site in
Kipling, Michigan and requested that we voluntarily undertake
actions to remediate the site. We owned and operated a portion
of the site from approximately 1902 through 1925 when we sold
the property to CITGO Petroleum Company. CITGO in turn, operated
at the site and thereafter sold the northern portion of the site
to a third party. This northern portion of the site was the
location of the majority of our former operations. CITGO has
been working formally with MDEQ to address the portions of the
site impacted by CITGOs operations on the property, which
occurred between 1925 and 1986. CITGO submitted a remedial
action plan in August 2003 to the MDEQ. However, the MDEQ
subsequently rejected this remedial action plan as being
inadequate.
We responded to the 1991 letter by performing a hydrogeological
investigation at the site in 1996, with
follow-up
monitoring occurring in 1998 through 2003. We developed a
proposed remedial action plan to address materials associated
with our former operations at the site. We currently estimate
the cost of implementing our proposed remedial action to be
$0.3 million, which was previously provided for in our
environmental reserve. We have not yet implemented the proposed
remedial action plan.
F-27
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In June 2004, the MDEQ made a new demand to both CITGO and the
Company to take responsive actions at the property, including
development and submittal of a remedial action plan to the
department for approval. CITGO and the Company agreed to
cooperate in the development of a joint remedial action plan as
encouraged by MDEQ. Additional investigative work at the site
has been undertaken by CITGO. At this time, it is unclear
whether the MDEQ, once aware of our response activities at the
site to date, will require further investigations or implement a
remedial action plan going beyond what has already been
developed. Conducting further investigations, revising our
proposed remedial action plan, or implementing the plan, could
result in higher costs than recorded. In addition, an access
agreement with the current owners will be required to conduct
the remediation.
Deer
Lake
Deer Lake is a reservoir located near Ishpeming, Michigan that
historically provided water storage for the Carp River Power
Plant that was razed in 1972. Elevated concentrations of mercury
in Deer Lake fish were noted in 1981. Three known sources of
mercury to the lake were atmospheric deposition, historic use of
mercury in gold amalgamation on the west side of the lake, and
releases of mercury to the City of Ishpeming sewer system,
including waste assay solutions from a laboratory operated by
Cliffs. The State of Michigan filed suit in 1982 alleging that
we had liability for the mercury releases. A Consent Agreement
was entered in 1984 that required certain remediation and
mitigation, which was performed, and by 2003 mercury
concentrations in fish had declined significantly. Subsequently,
we engaged in negotiations with the State to comprehensively and
completely resolve our liability for mercury releases. An
amendment to the Consent Agreement between the Company and the
State was entered by the Court on November 7, 2006. The
agreement provides for additional remedial measures, long-term
maintenance and provisions for public access to various water
bodies which we own or control. All 2007 activities required by
the amended Consent Agreement were completed.
Northshore
Air Permit Matters
On December 16, 2006, Northshore submitted an application
to the MPCA for an administrative amendment to its air pollution
operating permit. The proposed amendment requested the deletion
of a term in the air permit that was derived from a court case
brought against the Silver Bay taconite operations in 1972. The
permit term incorporated elements of the court-ordered
requirement to reduce fiber emissions to below a medically
significant level by installing controls that would be deemed
adequate if the fiber levels in Silver Bay were below those of a
control city such as St. Paul. We requested deletion
of this control city permit requirement on the
grounds that the court-ordered requirements had been satisfied
more than 20 years ago and should no longer be included in
the permit. The MPCA denied our application on February 23,
2007. We have appealed the denial to the Minnesota Court of
Appeals (the Amendment Appeal). The Amendment Appeal
is currently pending. Oral arguments were held on our appeal on
February 21, 2008.
Subsequent to the filing of the Amendment Appeal, the MPCA
alleged that Northshore was in violation of the control city
standard based on new data that the MPCA collected showing that
current fiber levels in St. Paul were lower than in Silver Bay
for a period in 2007. Northshore filed a motion with the
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota to
re-open the original Reserve Mining case, requesting that the
court declare the control city standard satisfied and the
courts injunction voided, or if the control city standard
remained in effect, clarify that it was a fixed standard set at
the 1980 level rather than a moving standard (the Federal
Suit). Shortly thereafter, the
Save Lake Superior Association and the Sierra Club
filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of
Minnesota with respect to alleged violations of the control city
standard (the Citizens Suit). On September 20,
2007, the court granted Northshores motion to stay the
Citizens Suit pending resolution of the Federal Suit.
The Court entered an order in the Federal Suit on
December 21, 2007, concluding that the 1975 federal court
injunction from the case no longer had any force or effect.
However, the courts order also stated that the control
city standard was a state permit requirement that can only be
addressed in state court. While the determination that the 1975
federal injunction no longer has any effect is favorable,
Northshore is currently analyzing the implications of
F-28
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the Federal Court order with respect to Northshores
operating permit and pending state appeal. On February 21 2008,
Northshore filed an appeal of certain aspects of the Federal
Courts order. The impact of the Federal Court order on the
Citizens Suit is also unclear, although the MPCA stated
during depositions in the Federal Court proceedings in November
2007 that based on current fiber sample results, it believes
Northshore to be in compliance with the control city permit term.
Koolyanobbing
operations
On May 14, 2007, the AEPA published a study in which they
recommended the establishment of A class reserves
for the protection of certain allegedly environmentally
sensitive areas of Western Australia. Some of the proposed A
class reserves overlap with mining tenements granted to Portman
(the Overlapping Areas). The AEPA study has been
submitted to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage.
Portman originally received governmental approval to mine in the
Overlapping Areas in June 2003. Since that time, we have met all
applicable environmental requirements. Although we are currently
reviewing the study and the effects of the designation of the
Overlapping Areas as A class reserves, such categorization may
have a material effect on our operations. It is unknown at this
time whether the Minister for the Environment and Heritage will
accept the recommendations of the AEPA. If the recommendations
of the AEPA are accepted, we will challenge any such decision.
Mine
Closure
The mine closure obligation of $118.5 million and
$90.9 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, includes our four consolidated North American
operating iron ore mines, a closed operation formerly known as
LTVSMC and our Asia-Pacific iron ore mines. The 2007 obligation
also includes three consolidated North American operating
coal mines and the coal mine at Sonoma.
The LTVSMC closure obligation results from an October 2001
transaction where we received a net payment of $50 million
and certain other assets and assumed environmental and facility
closure obligations estimated at $50 million, which
obligations have declined to $22.5 million at
December 31, 2007. In the fourth quarter of 2007, we sold
portions of the former LTVSMC site. The sale included cash
proceeds of approximately $18 million and the assumption by
Mesabi Nugget of certain environmental and reclamation
liabilities. The assets sold to Mesabi Nugget consist of
ownership and leasehold interests in the subject real property,
including mineral and surface rights. We also sold certain
assets at the LTVSMC site to PolyMet in 2005 and 2006. PolyMet
has assumed responsibility for environmental and reclamation
obligations related to the purchased assets. We will reduce our
liability related to these obligations as they are completed by
PolyMet. See NOTE 14 FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS.
The accrued closure obligation for our active mining operations
of $96.0 million provides for contractual and legal
obligations associated with the eventual closure of the mining
operations. We determined the obligations, based on detailed
estimates, adjusted for factors that an outside third party
would consider (i.e., inflation, overhead and profit), escalated
to the estimated closure dates and then discounted using a
credit adjusted risk-free interest rate for the initial
estimates. The estimate at December 31, 2007 and 2006
included incremental increases in the closure cost estimates and
minor changes in estimates of mine lives at Empire and United
Taconite. The closure date for each location was determined
based on the exhaustion date of the remaining economic iron ore
reserves. The accretion of the liability and amortization of the
related fixed asset is recognized over the estimated mine lives
for each location.
F-29
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following summarizes our asset retirement obligation
liability at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
62.7
|
|
|
$
|
52.5
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
PinnOak acquisition
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sonoma investment
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification from environmental obligations
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate changes
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Revision in estimated cash flows
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
96.0
|
|
|
$
|
62.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6
CREDIT FACILITIES
On August 17, 2007, we entered into a five-year unsecured
credit facility with a syndicate of 13 financial institutions.
The facility provides $800 million in borrowing capacity,
comprised of $200 million in term loans and
$600 million in revolving loans, swing loans and letters of
credit. Loans are drawn with a choice of interest rates and
maturities, subject to the terms of the agreement. Interest
rates are either (1) a range from LIBOR plus
0.45 percent to LIBOR plus 1.125 percent based on debt
and earnings or (2) the prime rate or the prime rate plus
1.125 percent, based on debt and earnings.
The credit agreement replaces a $500 million credit
agreement dated June 23, 2006 between Cliffs and various
lenders, which was scheduled to expire June 23, 2011. It
also replaces a credit agreement dated July 26, 2007
between Cliffs and various lenders for a $150 million
revolving credit facility scheduled to expire July 24,
2008. We incurred $0.8 million of expense, recorded in
Interest expense on the Statements of Consolidated
Operations, related to the accelerated write-off of debt
issuance costs due to the replacement of the $500 million
credit facility. The credit facility has two financial covenants
based on: (1) debt to earnings ratio and (2) interest
coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2007, we were in
compliance with the covenants in the credit agreement.
As of December 31, 2007, $240 million was drawn in
revolving loans and the principal amount of letter of credit
obligations totaled $16.2 million under the credit
facility. We also had $200 million drawn in term loans. We
had $343.8 million of borrowing capacity available under
the $800 million credit facility at December 31, 2007.
The weighted average annual interest rate for outstanding
revolving and term loans under the credit facility was
5.81 percent as of December 31, 2007. After the effect
of interest rate hedging, the weighted average annual borrowing
rate was 5.68 percent.
Portman is party to a A$40 million multi-option credit
facility, which was finalized in April 2007. The floating
interest rate is 20 basis points over the
90-day bank
bill swap rate in Australia. At December 31, 2007, the
outstanding bank commitments were A$12.5 million, reducing
borrowing capacity to A$27.5 million. The facility has two
covenants: (1) debt to earnings ratio and (2) interest
coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2007, Portman was in
compliance with the covenants in the credit facility.
In 2005, Portman secured five-year financing from its customers
in China as part of its long-term sales agreements to assist
with the funding of the expansion of its Koolyanobbing mining
operations. The borrowings, totaling $6.2 million at
December 31, 2007, accrued interest annually at five
percent. The borrowings require principal payments of
approximately $0.8 million plus accrued interest to be made
each January 31 for the next two years, with the balance due in
full on January 31, 2010.
F-30
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
NOTE 7
LEASE OBLIGATIONS
We lease certain mining, production, and other equipment under
operating and capital leases. The leases are for varying
lengths, generally at market interest rates and contain purchase
and/or
renewal options at the end of the terms. Our operating lease
expense was $14.7 million, $14.2 million and
$12.9 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Capital
leases were $68.2 million and $37.2 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Corresponding
accumulated amortization of capital leases included in
respective allowances for depreciation was $15.2 million
and $12.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Future minimum payments under capital leases and noncancellable
operating leases, at December 31, 2007 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
|
$
|
18.2
|
|
2009
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
2010
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
2011
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
2012
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
$
|
77.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts representing interest
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum capital lease payments of $77.4 million
include $1.0 million and $76.4 million for our
North American Iron Ore segment and Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
segment, respectively. Total minimum operating lease payments of
$77.9 million include $56.8 million for our North
American Iron Ore segment, $1.0 million for our North
American Coal segment, $14.6 million for our Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore segment and $5.5 million related to our corporate
office.
NOTE 8
RETIREMENT RELATED BENEFITS
We offer defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution
pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans to most
employees in our North American Iron Ore operations as part of a
total compensation and benefits program. Employees of the North
American Coal segment receive similar benefits as our North
American Iron Ore operations, except for defined benefit plans.
We do not have employee retirement benefit obligations at our
Asia-Pacific operations.
The defined benefit pension plans are largely noncontributory
and benefits are generally based on employees years of
service and average earnings for a defined period prior to
retirement or a minimum formula. On September 12, 2006, the
Companys Board of Directors approved modifications to the
pension benefits provided to salaried participants. The
modifications retroactively reinstated the final average pay
benefit formula (previously terminated and replaced with a cash
balance formula in July 2003) to allow for additional
accruals through June 30, 2008 or the continuation of
benefits under an improved cash balance formula, whichever is
greater. The change increased the PBO by $15.1 million and
pension expense by $1.1 million in 2006. Defined pension
plan benefit changes pursuant to the four-year labor agreements
reached with the USW for U.S. employees, effective
August 1, 2004, and similar changes agreed on for salaried
workers, were first recognized in 2005 pension expense. The
changes enhanced the temporary supplemental benefit provided
under the defined benefit plans and resulted in an increase of
$4.0 million in PBO and $0.6 million in 2005 pension
expense.
F-31
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In addition, we currently provide various levels of retirement
health care and OPEB to most full-time employees who meet
certain length of service and age requirements (a portion of
which are pursuant to collective bargaining agreements). Most
plans require retiree contributions and have deductibles, co-pay
requirements, and benefit limits. Most bargaining unit plans
require retiree contributions and co-pays for major medical and
prescription drug coverage. Effective July 1, 2003, we
imposed an annual limit on our cost for medical coverage under
the U.S. salaried plans, except for the plans covering
participants at the Northshore and LS&I operations. The
annual limit applies to each covered participant and equals
$7,000 for coverage prior to age 65 and $3,000 for coverage
after age 65, with the retirees participation
adjusted based on the age at which retirees benefits
commence. The covered participant pays an amount for coverage
equal to the excess of (i) the average cost of coverage for
all covered participants, over (ii) the participants
individual limit, but in no event will the participants
cost be less than 15 percent of the average cost of
coverage for all covered participants. The changes implemented
to the U.S. salaried pension and other benefit plans
reduced costs by an estimated $8.0 million on an annualized
basis. We do not provide OPEB for most U.S. salaried
employees hired after January 1, 1993. OPEB are provided
through programs administered by insurance companies whose
charges are based on benefits paid.
Our North American Coal segment is required under an agreement
with the UMWA to pay amounts into the UMWA pension trusts based
principally on hours worked by UMWA-represented employees. These
multiemployer pension trusts provide benefits to eligible
retirees through a defined benefit plan.
The UMWA 1993 Benefit Plan is a defined contribution plan that
was created as the result of negotiations for the NBCWA of 1993.
The Plan provides healthcare insurance to orphan UMWA retirees
who are not eligible to participate in the Combined Fund or the
1992 Benefit Fund or whose last employer signed the 1993 or
later NBCWA and who subsequently goes out of business.
Contributions to the Trust are at a rate of $4.00 per hour
worked and amounted to $2.6 million for the five-month
period since the PinnOak acquisition.
Pursuant to the four-year labor agreements reached with the USW
for U.S. employees, effective August 1, 2004,
negotiated plan changes capped our share of future bargaining
unit retirees healthcare premiums at 2008 levels for the
years 2009 and beyond. The agreements also provide that Cliffs
and its partners fund an estimated $220 million into
bargaining unit pension plans and VEBAs during the term of the
contracts.
In December 2003, The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement,
and Modernization Act of 2003 was enacted. This act introduced a
prescription drug benefit under Medicare Part D as well as
a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree healthcare benefit
plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially
equivalent to Medicare Part D. Our measures of the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net periodic
postretirement benefit cost as of December 31, 2004, and
for periods thereafter reflect amounts associated with the
subsidy. As a result, year 2007, 2006, and 2005 OPEB expense
reflect estimated cost reductions of $2.5 million,
$3.0 million and $3.4 million, respectively. We
elected to adopt the retroactive transition method for
recognizing the OPEB cost reduction in the second quarter 2004.
The following table summarizes the annual costs for the
retirement plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Defined benefit pension plans
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
Defined contribution pension plans
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
|
$
|
37.4
|
|
|
$
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables and information provide additional
disclosures for our consolidated plans.
Obligations
and Funded Status
On September 29, 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158,
requiring an entity to recognize on its balance sheet the funded
status of its defined benefit postretirement plans. Changes in
the funded status of a defined benefit
F-32
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
postretirement plan are recognized, net of tax, within
accumulated other comprehensive income, effective for fiscal
years ending after December 31, 2006.
The following tables and information provide additional
disclosures for the year-ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations beginning of year
|
|
$
|
706.7
|
|
|
$
|
698.0
|
|
|
$
|
272.2
|
|
|
$
|
301.2
|
|
Service cost (excluding expenses)
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
38.9
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gain
|
|
|
(29.8
|
)
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
(28.0
|
)
|
|
|
(30.8
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(46.4
|
)
|
|
|
(43.8
|
)
|
|
|
(22.4
|
)
|
|
|
(19.2
|
)
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Federal subsidy on benefits paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations end of year
|
|
$
|
680.8
|
|
|
$
|
706.7
|
|
|
$
|
252.7
|
|
|
$
|
272.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets beginning of year
|
|
$
|
568.7
|
|
|
$
|
511.5
|
|
|
$
|
114.9
|
|
|
$
|
86.9
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(46.4
|
)
|
|
|
(43.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets end of year
|
|
$
|
596.3
|
|
|
$
|
568.7
|
|
|
$
|
126.7
|
|
|
$
|
114.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
596.3
|
|
|
$
|
568.7
|
|
|
$
|
126.7
|
|
|
$
|
114.9
|
|
Benefit obligations
|
|
|
(680.8
|
)
|
|
|
(706.7
|
)
|
|
|
(252.7
|
)
|
|
|
(272.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status (plan assets less benefit obligations)
|
|
$
|
(84.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(138.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(157.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount recognized at December 31
|
|
$
|
(84.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(138.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(157.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in Statements of Financial Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
|
(18.3
|
)
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(89.7
|
)
|
|
|
(140.1
|
)
|
|
|
(114.8
|
)
|
|
|
(139.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(84.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(138.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(157.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
160.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
70.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service (credit) cost
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transition asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
182.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated
other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost in
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service (credit) cost
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transition asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
Salaried
|
|
|
Hourly
|
|
|
Mining
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Salaried
|
|
|
Hourly
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
253.4
|
|
|
$
|
342.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
596.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
126.7
|
|
|
$
|
126.7
|
|
Benefit obligation
|
|
|
(243.4
|
)
|
|
|
(430.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(680.8
|
)
|
|
|
(54.8
|
)
|
|
|
(197.9
|
)
|
|
|
(252.7
|
)
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
(87.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(84.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(71.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126.0
|
)
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit
pension plans was $657.6 million and $681.0 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Components
of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
38.9
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(47.1
|
)
|
|
|
(42.6
|
)
|
|
|
(39.3
|
)
|
|
|
(10.1
|
)
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (asset) obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
Prior service costs
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
Current year actuarial (gain)
|
|
|
(24.0
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(24.5
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Amortization of net (loss)
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Current year prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Amortization of transition asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(38.2
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
(22.4
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic cost and other comprehensive
income
|
|
$
|
(20.8
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
(18.0
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Effect of change in mine ownership & minority interest
|
|
$
|
45.8
|
|
|
$
|
47.0
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
Assumptions
At December 31, 2007 we increased our discount rate to
6.00 percent from 5.75 percent at December 31,
2006. The U.S. discount rates are determined by matching
the projected cash flows used to determine the PBO and APBO to a
projected yield curve of approximately 400 Aa graded bonds in
the
10th to
90th percentiles.
These bonds are either noncallable or callable with make-whole
provisions. The duration matching produced rates ranging from
5.97 percent to 6.12 percent for our plans.
F-34
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations at December 31 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
|
4.16
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net benefit cost
for the years 2007, 2006 and 2005 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50/5.75
|
%(1)
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.16
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
4.16
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Year 2006 SFAS 87 expense was re-measured on
September 12, 2006 at 5.75 percent to recognize
benefit improvements for salaried participants. |
Assumed
Health Care Cost Trend Rates at December 31 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
Ultimate health care cost trend rate
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Year that the ultimate rate is reached
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A
one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend
rates would have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
(19.8
|
)
|
Plan
Assets
The returns and risks associated with alternative investment
strategies in relation to the current and projected liabilities
of the various pension and VEBA plans are reviewed regularly to
determine appropriate asset allocation strategies for each plan.
F-35
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Pension
The pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 2007, and
2006, and the target allocation for 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Plan Assets at
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
54.2
|
%
|
|
|
53.0
|
%
|
|
|
54.8
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
Hedge funds
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at December 31,
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
315.8
|
|
|
$
|
311.4
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
194.0
|
|
|
|
179.1
|
|
Hedge funds
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
596.3
|
|
|
$
|
568.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected return on plan assets represents the weighted
average of expected returns for each asset category. Expected
returns are determined based on historical performance, adjusted
for current trends. The expected return is net of benefit plan
expenses.
VEBA
Assets for other benefits include VEBA trusts pursuant to
bargaining agreements that are available to fund retired
employees life insurance obligations and medical benefits.
The other benefit plan asset allocation at December 31,
2007, and 2006, and target allocation for 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Plan Assets at
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
59.6
|
%
|
|
|
58.8
|
%
|
|
|
60.7
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
Hedge funds
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at December 31,
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
74.5
|
|
|
$
|
69.8
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
Hedge funds
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
126.7
|
|
|
$
|
114.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected return on plan assets represents the weighted
average of expected returns for each asset category. Expected
returns are determined based on historical performance, adjusted
for current trends. The expected return is net of benefit plan
expenses.
Annual contributions to the pension plans are made within income
tax deductibility restrictions in accordance with statutory
regulations. In the event of plan termination, the plan sponsors
could be required to fund additional shutdown and early
retirement obligations that are not included in the pension
obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
|
|
Company Contributions
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
VEBA
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
40.7
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
15.0
|
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
2007
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
2008 (Expected)*
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Because the United Taconite VEBA trust is at least
90 percent funded at December 31, 2007, contributions
are not required. Pursuant to the bargaining agreement, benefits
can be paid from VEBA trusts that are at least 70 percent
funded. |
VEBA plans are not subject to minimum regulatory funding
requirements. Amounts contributed are pursuant to bargaining
agreements.
Contributions by participants to the other benefit plans were
$3.3 million and $2.9 million for years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
We are currently considering various options for the amount to
be contributed to the pension plans during 2008. The amounts
reflected represent minimum funding requirements and bargaining
agreements.
Estimated
Cost for 2008
For 2008, we estimate net periodic benefit cost as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Defined benefit pension plans
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
Defined contribution plans
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Estimated
Company Benefit Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Medicare
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Subsidy
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
50.7
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
2009
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
2010
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
2011
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
2012
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
|
255.5
|
|
|
|
105.9
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
98.7
|
|
Other
Potential Benefit Obligations
While the foregoing reflects our obligation, our total exposure
in the event of non-performance is potentially greater.
Following is a summary comparison of the total obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Defined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Pensions
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
596.3
|
|
|
$
|
126.7
|
|
Benefit obligation
|
|
|
680.8
|
|
|
|
252.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underfunded status of plan
|
|
$
|
(84.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional shutdown and early retirement benefits
|
|
$
|
38.6
|
|
|
$
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest include the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
312.3
|
|
|
$
|
304.9
|
|
|
$
|
345.0
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
380.7
|
|
|
$
|
387.8
|
|
|
$
|
368.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The components of the provision for income taxes on continuing
operations consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Current provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States federal
|
|
$
|
67.7
|
|
|
$
|
59.0
|
|
|
$
|
63.5
|
|
United States state & local
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117.2
|
|
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
|
89.2
|
|
Deferred provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States federal
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
United States state & local
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(17.5
|
)
|
|
|
(14.7
|
)
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision on continuing operations
|
|
$
|
84.1
|
|
|
$
|
90.9
|
|
|
$
|
84.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of our income tax attributable to continuing
operations computed at the United States federal statutory rate
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Tax at U.S. statutory rate of 35 percent
|
|
$
|
133.3
|
|
|
$
|
135.7
|
|
|
$
|
128.8
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage depletion in excess of cost depletion
|
|
|
(46.9
|
)
|
|
|
(32.7
|
)
|
|
|
(37.6
|
)
|
Tax effect of foreign operations
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Manufacturers deduction
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)
|
Other items net
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
84.1
|
|
|
$
|
90.9
|
|
|
$
|
84.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of income taxes for other than continuing
operations consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Other comprehensive (income) loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement liability
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
(10.5
|
)
|
Mark-to-market adjustments
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of implementing SFAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in capital stock options
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
F-39
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Significant components of our deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions
|
|
$
|
48.6
|
|
|
$
|
62.7
|
|
Postretirement benefits other than pensions
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
Capital loss carryforwards
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
Development
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
Operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Product inventories
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent purchase price
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance
|
|
|
269.5
|
|
|
|
206.0
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
243.2
|
|
|
|
194.1
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
257.0
|
|
|
|
135.2
|
|
Investment in ventures
|
|
|
99.4
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
Product inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
373.4
|
|
|
|
196.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(130.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The deferred tax amounts are classified on the Statements of
Consolidated Financial Position as current or long-term in
accordance with the asset or liability to which they relate.
Following is a summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
17.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.4
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
42.1
|
|
|
|
107.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total United States
|
|
|
59.4
|
|
|
|
116.4
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
|
|
116.4
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
187.6
|
|
|
|
117.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
190.2
|
|
|
|
119.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(130.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, we had $20.4 million of deferred
tax assets related to United States alternative minimum tax
credits that can be carried forward indefinitely.
At December 31, 2007, we had United States federal, state
and foreign net operating losses of $1.1 million,
$38.8 million and $43.7 million, respectively. The
United States federal net operating loss carryforward will
expire in 2022, the state net operating losses will begin to
expire in 2022 and the foreign net operating loss can be carried
forward indefinitely. The tax benefit related to the federal and
foreign net operating loss carryforwards is $0.4 million
and $13.0 million, respectively. We also have a capital
loss carryforward of $44.2 million which can be carried
forward indefinitely. The tax benefit related to the capital
loss carryforward is $13.3 million.
Gross deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006
have been reduced by $26.3 million and $11.9 million,
respectively, to amounts that are considered
more-likely-than-not of being realized. Of the
$26.3 million at December 31, 2007, $13.3 million
relates to Portman deferred tax assets existing at the time of
the 2005 acquisition. Any reversal of this portion of the
valuation allowance reduces goodwill.
At December 31, 2007, cumulative undistributed earnings of
our Asia-Pacific Iron Ore subsidiary included in consolidated
retained earnings amounted to $78.7 million. These earnings
are indefinitely reinvested in international operations.
Accordingly, no provision has been made for deferred taxes
related to the future repatriation of these earnings, nor is it
practicable to determine the amount of this liability.
On January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of
FIN 48. FIN 48 prescribes a more-likely-than-not
threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of
a tax position taken (or expected to be taken) in a tax return.
This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition of
income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and
deferred income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for
interest and penalties associated with tax positions, accounting
for income taxes in interim periods and income tax disclosures.
The effects of applying this Interpretation resulted in a
decrease of $7.7 million to retained earnings as of
January 1, 2007.
F-41
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits balance as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
Increases for tax positions in prior years
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Decreases for tax positions in prior years
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
Lapses in statutes of limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, we had $15.2 million of
unrecognized tax benefits recorded in Other liabilities
on the Statements of Consolidated Financial Position, of
which $15.2 million, if recognized, would impact the
effective tax rate. We recognize potential accrued interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax
expense. At December 31, 2007, we had $11.0 million of
accrued interest related to the unrecognized tax benefits.
Tax years that remain subject to examination are years 2003 and
forward for the United States, 1993 and forward for Canada and
1994 and forward for Australia. It is reasonably possible that a
decrease of $11.2 million in unrecognized tax benefit
obligations will occur within the next 12 months due to
expected settlements with the taxing authorities. While the
expected settlements remain uncertain, before settlement, it is
reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefit
may increase by $1.0 million.
|
|
NOTE 10
|
PREFERRED
STOCK
|
In January 2004, we completed an offering of $172.5 million
of redeemable cumulative convertible perpetual preferred stock,
without par value, issued at $1,000 per share. The preferred
stock pays quarterly cash dividends at a rate of
3.25 percent per annum, has a liquidation preference of
$1,000 per share and is convertible into our common shares at an
adjusted rate of 133.0646 common shares per share of preferred
stock, which is equivalent to an adjusted conversion price of
$7.56 per share at December 31, 2007, subject to further
adjustment in certain circumstances. Each share of preferred
stock may be converted by the holder if during any quarter
ending after March 31, 2004 the closing sale price of our
common stock for at least 20 trading days in a period of 30
consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the
preceding quarter exceeds 110 percent of the applicable
conversion price on such trading day ($8.31 at December 31,
2007; this threshold was met as of December 31, 2007). The
satisfaction of this condition allows conversion of the
preferred stock during the quarter ending March 31, 2008.
Holders of preferred stock may also convert: (1) if during
the five business day period after any five consecutive
trading-day
period in which the trading price per share of preferred stock
for each day of that period was less than 98 percent of the
product of the closing sale price of our common stock and the
applicable conversion rate on each such day; (2) upon the
occurrence of certain corporate transactions; or (3) if the
preferred stock has been called for redemption.
On or after January 20, 2009, we may, at our option, redeem
some or all of the preferred stock at a redemption price equal
to 100 percent of the liquidation preference, plus
accumulated but unpaid dividends, but only if the closing price
exceeds 135 percent of the conversion price, subject to
adjustment, for 20 trading days within a period of 30
consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the
date we give the redemption notice. We may also exchange the
preferred stock for convertible subordinated debentures in
certain circumstances. We have reserved approximately
22.4 million common treasury shares for possible future
issuance for the conversion of the preferred stock. Our shelf
registration statement with respect to the resale of the
preferred stock, the convertible subordinated debentures that we
may issue in exchange for the preferred stock and the common
shares issuable upon conversion of the preferred stock and the
convertible subordinated debentures was declared effective by
the SEC on July 22, 2004. We are no longer contractually
obligated to maintain the effectiveness of the registration
statement due to the expiration of the effectiveness period.
Accordingly, on February 14, 2006, we deregistered
92,655 shares of Preferred Stock, $172.5 million in
aggregate principal amount of debentures and approximately
11.2 million
F-42
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
common shares that have not been resold. The preferred stock is
classified for accounting purposes as temporary
equity reflecting certain provisions of the agreement that
could, under remote circumstances (the delisting of our common
stock on a U.S. national securities exchange or quotation
thereof in an inter-dealer quotation system of any registered
U.S. national securities association), require us to redeem
the preferred stock for cash. If we are in a default in the
payment of six quarterly dividends on the preferred stock, the
holders of the preferred stock will thereafter be entitled to
elect two directors until all accrued and unpaid dividends are
paid.
The following is a summary of activity of the preferred stock
during 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Number of preferred shares converted
|
|
|
37,585
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Number of common shares issued from Treasury upon conversion
|
|
|
4,975,296
|
|
|
|
26,132
|
|
Balance of preferred stock outstanding as of December 31,
|
|
|
134,715
|
|
|
|
172,300
|
|
Redemption value at December 31 (in millions)
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
On January 17, 2008, 24,010 preferred shares were converted
to 3,178,352 shares of common stock at a conversion rate of
133.0646, reducing our preferred stock outstanding to
110,705 shares.
Nonemployee
Directors
The Directors Plan was amended in 2001 to authorize us to
issue up to 800,000 common shares to Nonemployee Directors. The
Directors Plan provides for Director Share Ownership
Guidelines (Guidelines). A Director is required by
the end of a four-year period to own either (i) a total of
at least 8,000 common shares, or (ii) hold common shares
with a market value of at least $100,000. If the Nonemployee
Director does not meet the Guidelines assessed December 1,
annually, the Nonemployee Director must take $15,000 of the
annual retainer ($32,500) in common shares (Required
Retainer) until such time the Nonemployee Director reaches
the Guidelines. Once the Nonemployee Director meets the
Guidelines, the Nonemployee Director may elect to receive the
Required Retainer in cash.
In order to help Nonemployee Directors achieve their Guidelines,
the Directors Plan also provides for an Annual Equity
Grant (Equity Grant). The Equity Grant is awarded at
our Annual Meeting each year to all Nonemployee Directors
elected or re-elected by the shareholders. The value of the
Equity Grant is $32,500 payable in restricted shares with a
three-year vesting period from the date of grant. The closing
market price of our common shares on our Annual Meeting Date is
divided into the $32,500 Equity Grant to determine the number of
restricted shares awarded. A Director may elect to defer the
Equity Grant into the Nonemployee Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan (Compensation Plan). A Director
who is 69 or older at the Equity Grant date will receive common
shares with no restrictions.
For the last three years, restricted Equity Grant shares have
been awarded to elected or re-elected Directors as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Equity
|
|
|
Deferred Equity
|
|
Date of Grant
|
|
Grant Shares
|
|
|
Grant Shares
|
|
|
July 12, 2005
|
|
|
12,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2005
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 8, 2006
|
|
|
9,156
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
The Directors Plan offers the Nonemployee Director the
opportunity to defer all or a portion of the Annual
Directors Retainer fees ($32,500), Chair retainers,
meeting fees, and the Equity Grant into the Compensation Plan.
One Director actively deferred stock in the Compensation Plan in
2007.
F-43
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Employees
Plans
On July 27, 2007, shareholders of the Company adopted the
2007 ICE Plan, resulting in the discontinuation of the previous
1992 ICE Plan, as amended in 1999 effective as of March 13,
2007 and will expire on March 13, 2013. The 2007 ICE Plan
authorizes up to 4,000,000 of our common shares to be issued as
stock options, SARs, restricted shares, restricted share
units, retention units, deferred shares, and performance shares
or performance units. Any of the foregoing awards may be made
subject to attainment of performance goals over a performance
period of one or more years. Each stock option and SAR will
reduce the common shares available under the 2007 ICE Plan by
one common share. Each other award will reduce the common shares
available under the 2007 ICE Plan by two common shares. No
participant in any fiscal year can be granted in the aggregate
of a number of Shares having a Fair Market Value on the Date of
Grant equal to more than $5 million. The performance shares
are intended to meet the requirements of Internal Revenue code
section 162(m) for deduction while the retention units are
not.
The adoption of the 2007 ICE Plan also resulted in the
discontinuation of other various incentive and long-term
compensation programs maintained under the 1992 ICE Plan. All
outstanding grants made under the 1992 ICE Plan prior to
July 27, 2007 continue in effect in accordance with their
terms of the existing incentive plans until vested or expired.
We issued the following amounts of restricted stock with a
three-year vesting period during the last three years out of the
respective plans as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 ICE
|
|
|
2007 ICE
|
|
Year of Grant
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
286,884
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
313,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
145,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
270,964 restricted shares were issued March 8, 2005. As of
November 30, 2005, we re-measured the shares for
retiree-eligible employees. We immediately vested one-half of
the restricted grant awards to those individuals, resulting in
an acceleration of $1.9 million of expense. The remaining
restricted shares vested December 31, 2007. |
There were no options issued in 2007, 2006 or 2005.
We recorded other stock-based compensation expense of
$12.4 million in 2007, $10.3 million in 2006, and
$17.4 million in 2005, primarily in Selling, general and
administrative expenses on the Statements of Consolidated
Operations. Our other stock-based compensation expense is
comprised of Performance Shares, including retention units, and
Restricted stock. Following is a summary of our Performance
Share Award Agreements currently outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Share Plan Year
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Forfeitures*
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Performance Period
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
3,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2007
|
|
|
1/1/2007-12/31/2009
|
|
2007
|
|
|
233,860
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
1/1/2007-12/31/2009
|
|
2006
|
|
|
13,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 11, 2006
|
|
|
1/1/2006-12/31/2008
|
|
2006
|
|
|
28,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2006
|
|
|
1/1/2006-12/31/2008
|
|
2006
|
|
|
124,230
|
|
|
|
63,370
|
|
|
May 8, 2006
|
|
|
1/1/2006-12/31/2008
|
|
2006
|
|
|
19,710
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
September 1, 2006
|
|
|
1/1/2006-12/31/2008
|
|
2005
|
|
|
5,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 15, 2005
|
|
|
1/1/2005-12/31/2007
|
|
2005
|
|
|
12,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 23, 2005
|
|
|
1/1/2005-12/31/2007
|
|
2005
|
|
|
145,126
|
|
|
|
33,038
|
|
|
March 8, 2005
|
|
|
1/1/2005-12/31/2007
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The 2007 and 2006 Plans are based on assumed forfeitures. The
2005 Plan is based on actual forfeitures. |
F-44
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
For all three Plan Year Agreements, each performance share, if
earned, entitles the holder to receive a number of common shares
within the range between a threshold and maximum number of
shares, with the actual number of common shares earned dependent
upon whether the Company achieves certain objectives established
by the Compensation Committee of its Board of Directors. The
performance payout is determined primarily by Cliffs TSR
for the period as measured against a predetermined peer group of
mining and metals companies. For the 2007, 2006 and 2005
Agreements, the TSR calculated payout may be reduced by up to
50 percent in the event that Cliffs pre-tax RONA for
the incentive period falls below 12 percent. Additionally,
the payout for the 2005 Agreement may be increased or reduced by
up to 25 percent of the target based on managements
performance relative to our strategic objectives over the
performance period as evaluated by the Compensation Committee.
The final payout may vary from zero to 175 percent of the
performance shares awarded for the 2005 Agreement subject to a
maximum payout of two times the grant date price. The final
payout for the 2007 and 2006 Agreements vary from zero to
150 percent of the performance shares awarded.
Impact
of the Adoption of SFAS 123R
Under existing restricted stock plans awarded prior to
January 1, 2006, we will continue to recognize compensation
cost for awards to retiree-eligible employees without
substantive forfeiture risk over the nominal vesting period.
This recognition method differs from the requirements for
immediate recognition for awards granted with similar provisions
after the January 1, 2006 adoption of SFAS 123R.
The following table summarizes the share-based compensation
expense that we recorded for continuing operations in accordance
with SFAS 123R for 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions,
|
|
|
|
except EPS)
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Reduction of operating income from continuing operations before
income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of net income
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, we presented all tax
benefits for actual deductions in excess of compensation expense
as operating cash flows on our Statements of Consolidated Cash
Flows. SFAS 123R requires the cash flows resulting from the
tax benefits for tax deductions in excess of the compensation
expense to be classified as financing cash flows. Accordingly,
we classified $4.3 million and $1.2 million in excess
tax benefits as cash from financing activities rather than cash
from operating activities on our Statements of Consolidated Cash
Flows for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Determining
fair value
We estimated fair value using a Monte Carlo simulation to
forecast relative TSR performance. Consistent with the
guidelines of SFAS 123R, a correlation matrix of historic
and projected stock prices was developed for both Cliffs and its
predetermined peer group of mining and metals companies.
F-45
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The expected term of the grant represented the time from the
grant date to the end of the service period for each of the
three performance Agreements. We estimated the volatility of our
common stock and that of the peer group of mining and metals
companies using daily price intervals for all companies. The
risk-free interest rate was the rate at the valuation date on
zero-coupon government bonds, with a term commensurate with the
remaining life of the performance plans.
The assumptions for the 2007 plan year utilized to estimate the
fair value of the Agreements incorporating Cliffs relative
TSR and the calculated fair values are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Expected
|
|
Expected
|
|
Risk-Free
|
|
Dividend
|
|
Grant Date
|
Plan Year
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Price
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
Volatility
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Yield
|
|
Market Price)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
10/1/2007
|
|
|
$
|
45.89
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
105.95
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
7/27/2007
|
|
|
|
34.70
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
105.95
|
|
On April 30, 2007, the Compensation and Organization
Committee of the Board of Directors provided the 2005 and 2006
Plan participants with the option to elect to measure
performance for the pay-out of performance shares to be based
upon a single three-year performance (new averaging)
rather than using cumulative quarterly performance (old
averaging). Below are the assumptions for the 2005 and
2006 awards, with the fair value as a percent of the grant date,
using the new averaging method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
Risk-Free
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Plan Year
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Market Price
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Market Price)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
|
$
|
24.00
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
4.68
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
94.54
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
9/1/2006
|
|
|
|
18.73
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
4.68
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
121.15
|
|
2006
|
|
|
5/8/2006
|
|
|
|
24.09
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
4.68
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
47.10
|
|
2006
|
|
|
9/1/2006
|
|
|
|
18.73
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
121.15
|
|
2005
|
|
|
11/15/2005
|
|
|
|
22.05
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
104.06
|
|
2005
|
|
|
5/23/2005
|
|
|
|
14.01
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
127.94
|
|
2005
|
|
|
3/8/2005
|
|
|
|
19.63
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
112.89
|
|
Below is the difference in the 2005 and 2006 old
averaging fair value, calculated prior to the modification
and the new averaging fair value, calculated under
the new terms:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Pre-modification
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Revised
|
|
Plan Year
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Stock Price
|
|
|
Fair Value(1)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
|
$
|
24.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
41.37
|
|
|
$
|
45.37
|
|
2006
|
|
|
9/1/2006
|
|
|
|
18.73
|
|
|
|
4.01
|
|
|
|
41.36
|
|
|
|
45.37
|
|
2006
|
|
|
5/8/2006
|
|
|
|
24.09
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
18.69
|
|
|
|
22.69
|
|
2006
|
|
|
9/1/2006
|
|
|
|
18.73
|
|
|
|
4.01
|
|
|
|
41.36
|
|
|
|
45.37
|
|
2005
|
|
|
11/15/2005
|
|
|
|
22.05
|
|
|
|
49.72
|
|
|
|
(3.83
|
)
|
|
|
45.89
|
|
2005
|
|
|
5/23/2005
|
|
|
|
14.01
|
|
|
|
39.23
|
|
|
|
(3.38
|
)
|
|
|
35.85
|
|
2005
|
|
|
3/8/2005
|
|
|
|
19.63
|
|
|
|
48.05
|
|
|
|
(3.73
|
)
|
|
|
44.32
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the fair value immediately preceeding the modification |
We adjusted the number of shares awarded under our share-based
equity plans concurrent with our June 30, 2006 two-for-one
stock split. Management has concluded that the equity
anti-dilution adjustments were required and accordingly, the
adjustments did not require the recognition of incremental
compensation expense.
F-46
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Stock option, restricted stock, deferred stock allocation and
performance share activity under our Incentive Equity Plans and
Non-employee Directors Compensation Plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
23,600
|
|
|
$
|
5.04
|
|
|
|
108,536
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
|
|
872,336
|
|
|
$
|
7.80
|
|
Granted during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(11,800
|
)
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
(84,936
|
)
|
|
|
7.99
|
|
|
|
(700,200
|
)
|
|
|
8.14
|
|
Cancelled or expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,600
|
)
|
|
|
4.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
11,800
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
|
|
|
23,600
|
|
|
|
5.04
|
|
|
|
108,536
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
|
Options exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
11,800
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
|
|
|
23,600
|
|
|
|
5.04
|
|
|
|
108,536
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
|
Restricted awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded and restricted at beginning of year
|
|
|
649,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded during the year
|
|
|
164,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(299,302
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded and restricted at end of year
|
|
|
514,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated at beginning of year
|
|
|
861,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,468,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated during the year
|
|
|
390,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
(529,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(405,036
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(542,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(613,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(505,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated at end of year
|
|
|
723,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
861,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
586,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors retainer and voluntary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded at end of year
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserved for future grants or awards at end of year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee plans
|
|
|
1,842,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,668,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,542,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors plans
|
|
|
158,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,000,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,842,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,729,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007, 2006 and
2005 was $0.1 million, $0.7 million and
$2.8 million, respectively.
A summary of our non-vested shares as of December 31, 2007
is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested, beginning of year
|
|
|
1,512,096
|
|
|
$
|
14.35
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
455,892
|
|
|
|
35.10
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(728,630
|
)
|
|
|
11.73
|
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, end of year
|
|
|
1,239,358
|
|
|
$
|
23.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet
recognized is $13.1 million.
Exercise prices for stock options outstanding as of
December 31, 2007 ranged are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$5 - $10
|
|
|
11,800
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
5.42
|
|
F-48
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 12
|
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) and
related tax effects allocated to each are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax
|
|
|
Tax Benefit
|
|
|
After-tax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Provision)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Year-ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum postretirement benefit liability
|
|
$
|
(107.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
(100.8
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(24.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.7
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on securities
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(132.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
|
$
|
(125.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum postretirement benefit liability
|
|
$
|
(80.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(82.9
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
Cumulative effect of implementing SFAS 158
|
|
|
(171.1
|
)
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
|
(110.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(220.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
50.8
|
|
|
$
|
(169.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit liability
|
|
$
|
(192.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
37.7
|
|
|
$
|
(154.8
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
96.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.5
|
|
Unrealized net gain on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on securities
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(55.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
24.7
|
|
|
$
|
(30.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) balances are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
(Loss) on
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Adoption
|
|
|
Net Gain
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(Loss) on
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
of SFAS
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
No. 158
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Rate Swap
|
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
(81.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(81.0
|
)
|
Change during 2005
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
(24.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(44.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(100.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
(24.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(125.6
|
)
|
Change during 2006
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
(110.7
|
)
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
(44.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(82.9
|
)
|
|
|
(110.7
|
)
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
(169.9
|
)
|
Change during 2007
|
|
|
(71.9
|
)
|
|
|
110.7
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
86.9
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
139.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
(154.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
|
$
|
96.5
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
18.7
|
|
|
$
|
(30.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13
|
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
Under our share purchase rights plan, one-quarter of a right is
attached to each of our common shares outstanding or
subsequently issued. One right entitles the holder to buy from
us one-hundredth of one common share. The rights expired on
September 19, 2007.
|
|
NOTE 14
|
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
The carrying amount and fair value of our financial instruments
at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
157.1
|
|
|
$
|
157.8
|
|
|
$
|
351.7
|
|
|
$
|
351.7
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
69.5
|
|
|
|
69.5
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
Long-term receivable*
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
61.4
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
Marketable securities*
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
Hedge contracts (long-term)
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Long-term debt*
|
|
|
446.2
|
|
|
|
445.7
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Deferred payment
|
|
|
96.2
|
|
|
|
96.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes current portion. |
Certain supply agreements with one of our North American
customers include provisions for supplemental revenue or refunds
based on the customers annual steel pricing for the year
the product is consumed in the customers blast furnace.
The supplemental pricing is characterized as an embedded
derivative instrument and is required to be accounted for
separately from the contract base price. The embedded derivative
instrument, which is finalized based on a future price, is
marked to fair value as revenue adjustments each reporting
period until the
F-50
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
product is consumed and the amount is settled. Derivative
assets, representing the fair value of pricing factors, were
$53.8 million and $26.6 million on the
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 Statements of
Consolidated Financial Position, respectively.
The fair value of the long-term receivable from ArcelorMittal
USA of $60.9 million and $68.4 million at
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively,
is based on the discount rate utilized by the Company, which
represents an approximate fixed borrowing rate. Portman has a
non-interest bearing rail credit receivable of $0.5 million
and $0.8 million at December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 respectively.
Marketable securities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Held to maturity current
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Held to maturity non-current
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held to maturity
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale non-current
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
74.6
|
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
|
$
|
73.1
|
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
|
$
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate notes
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, we held investments totaling
$44.7 million which were stated at cost and classified as
held to maturity. The investments are held in asset-backed
securities and floating rate notes. We evaluate our investments
in securities for impairment at each reporting period in
accordance with SFAS 115. If a decline in fair value is
judged other than temporary, the basis of the individual
security is written down to fair value as a new cost basis and
the amount of the write-down is included as a realized loss.
The fair value of our current held to maturity investments,
consisting primarily of floating rate note investments, is below
cost. We intend to hold these investments to maturity, when we
will contractually receive the face value of these investments.
The impairment of the floating rate note investment was
determined to be temporary and no impairment was recognized.
We own 9.2 million shares of PolyMet Corp common stock,
representing 6.7 percent of issued shares as a result of
the sale of certain land, crushing and concentrating and other
ancillary facilities located at our Cliffs Erie site (formerly
owned by LTVSMC) to PolyMet. We intend to hold our shares of
PolyMet indefinitely. We have the right to participate in up to
6.7 percent of any future financing and PolyMet has the
first right to acquire or place Cliffs shares should it choose
to sell. We classified the shares as available-for-sale and
record mark-to-market changes in the value of the shares to
other comprehensive income.
At December 31, 2007, our North American Iron Ore mining
ventures had in place forward purchase contracts, designated as
normal purchases, of natural gas and diesel fuel in the notional
amount of $39.4 million and $13.2 million,
respectively. The unrecognized fair value gain on the contracts
at December 31, 2007, which mature at various times through
December 2009 was estimated to be $5.7 million based on
December 31, 2007 forward rates.
At our Asia-Pacific iron ore operations, we hedge a portion of
our United States currency-denominated sales in accordance with
a formal policy. The primary objective for using derivative
financial instruments is to reduce the earnings volatility
attributable to changes in Australian and United States currency
fluctuations. We had $15.7 million and $6.3 million of
hedge contracts recorded as Derivative assets on the
December 31, 2007 and
F-51
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
2006 Statements of Consolidated Financial Position,
respectively, and $5.9 million and $3.6 million of
hedge contracts recorded as long-term assets as Deposits and
miscellaneous on the Statements of Consolidated Financial
Position at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The fair value of long-term debt is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
$
|
200.0
|
|
|
$
|
200.0
|
|
Revolving loan
|
|
|
240.0
|
|
|
|
240.0
|
|
Customer borrowings
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
446.2
|
|
|
$
|
445.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The term loan and revolving loan are variable rate interest and
approximate fair value. The fair value of the customer
borrowings was determined based on a discounted cash flow
analysis and estimated current borrowing rates. See
NOTE 6 CREDIT FACILITIES.
|
|
NOTE 15
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
The following table summarizes the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share)
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
269.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.25
|
|
|
$
|
279.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.33
|
|
|
$
|
273.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.15
|
|
Preferred dividend
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(.06
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(.07
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations applicable to common shares
|
|
|
264.6
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
274.2
|
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
267.6
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
Cumulative effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income applicable to common shares basic
|
|
|
264.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
274.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
272.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect preferred dividend
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income applicable to common shares plus assumed
conversions diluted
|
|
$
|
270.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
$
|
280.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
$
|
277.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
82,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock plans
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
21,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
105,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have been named defendants in 485 actions brought from 1986
to date by former seamen in which the plaintiffs claim damages
under federal law for illnesses allegedly suffered as the result
of exposure to airborne asbestos fibers while serving as crew
members aboard the vessels previously owned or managed by our
entities until
F-52
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the mid-1980s. All of these actions have been consolidated into
multidistrict proceedings in the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania, whose docket now includes a total of over 30,000
maritime cases filed by seamen against ship-owners and other
defendants. All of these cases have been dismissed without
prejudice, but can be reinstated upon application by
plaintiffs counsel. The claims against our entities are
insured in amounts that vary by policy year; however, the manner
in which these retentions will be applied remains uncertain. Our
entities continue to vigorously contest these claims and have
made no settlements on them.
We are periodically involved in litigation incidental to our
operations. We believe that any pending litigation will not
result in a material liability in relation to our consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
NOTE 17
|
CASH FLOW
INFORMATION
|
Cash payments for interest and income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Taxes paid on income
|
|
$
|
123.6
|
|
|
$
|
95.7
|
|
|
$
|
86.2
|
|
Interest paid on debt obligations
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
We acquired PinnOak for $450 million in cash, of which
$108.4 million was deferred until December 31, 2009,
plus the non-cash assumption of $159.6 million in debt,
which was repaid at closing. The deferred payment was discounted
to $93.7 million using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate of
six percent. In conjunction with the acquisition, liabilities
assumed are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired
|
|
$
|
850.8
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(346.4
|
)
|
Non-cash debt assumed
|
|
|
(159.6
|
)
|
Deferred payment
|
|
|
(93.7
|
)
|
Acquisition costs
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
249.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of capital additions to cash paid for capital
expenditures is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Capital additions
|
|
$
|
235.1
|
|
|
$
|
112.5
|
|
|
$
|
109.8
|
|
Cash paid for capital expenditures
|
|
|
199.5
|
|
|
|
119.5
|
|
|
|
97.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference
|
|
$
|
35.6
|
|
|
$
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash accruals
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.0
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
35.6
|
|
|
$
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 18
|
QUARTERLY
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per common share)
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
325.5
|
|
|
$
|
547.6
|
|
|
$
|
619.6
|
|
|
$
|
782.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,275.2
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
129.6
|
|
|
|
107.3
|
|
|
|
163.3
|
|
|
|
462.0
|
|
Income before extraordinary gain and cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
86.9
|
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
270.0
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
86.9
|
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
270.0
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
|
$
|
3.19
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
.31
|
|
|
|
.83
|
|
|
|
.54
|
|
|
|
.89
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
The sum of quarterly EPS may not equal EPS for the year due to
discrete quarterly calculations.
Our 2007 financial statements include PinnOaks results
since the July 31, 2007 acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales and services
|
|
$
|
306.4
|
|
|
$
|
486.2
|
|
|
$
|
580.1
|
|
|
$
|
549.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,921.7
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
|
55.4
|
|
|
|
128.7
|
|
|
|
132.5
|
|
|
|
97.4
|
|
|
|
414.0
|
|
Income before extraordinary gain and cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
89.1
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
|
280.1
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
89.1
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
|
280.1
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.42
|
|
|
$
|
.96
|
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
.34
|
|
|
|
.77
|
|
|
|
.84
|
|
|
|
.67
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
All common shares and per share amounts have been adjusted
retroactively to reflect the two-for-one stock split effective
May 15, 2008.
F-54
Cleveland-Cliffs
Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
to Cost
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
to Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Classification
|
|
of Year
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26.3
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
F-55
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc
Cleveland, OH
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. As described in Managements Report on
Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting, management
excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial
reporting at PinnOak Resources, LLC, which was acquired on
July 31, 2007 and whose financial statements constitute 9%
and 25% of net and total assets, respectively, 4% of revenues
and (17%) of net income of the consolidated financial statement
amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over
financial reporting at PinnOak Resources, LLC. The
Companys management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Controls Over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
F-56
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 of
the Company and our report dated February 29, 2008
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements
and financial statement schedule and included an explanatory
paragraph regarding the Companys adoption of new
accounting standards.
/s/ DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP
Cleveland, OH
February 29, 2008
F-57
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc
Cleveland, OH
We have audited the accompanying statements of consolidated
financial position of Cleveland-Cliffs Inc and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and
the related statements of consolidated operations,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits
also included the financial statement schedule
(Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts). These financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated February 29, 2008,
expressed an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 9 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, in 2007. As
discussed in Notes 1, 8, and 11 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, and SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans, in 2006. Additionally, as
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, in 2005 the Company changed its method of accounting
for stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a
mine.
/s/ DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP
Cleveland, OH
February 29, 2008 (August 8, 2008 as to the effects of the
stock split described in Note 19)
F-58
Managements
Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Exchange Act. Our internal control system was designed to
provide reasonable assurance to the Companys management
and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair
presentation of published financial statements. All internal
control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent
limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to
financial statement preparation and presentation.
On July 31, 2007, we completed our acquisition of
100 percent of PinnOak. As permitted by the SEC, we
excluded PinnOak from managements assessment of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.
PinnOak constituted approximately 9 percent and
25 percent of net and total assets, respectively, as of
December 31, 2007 and four percent and negative
17 percent of consolidated total revenues and net income,
respectively. PinnOak will be included in managements
assessment of the internal control over financial reporting for
the Company as of December 31, 2008.
We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this
assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control Integrated Framework . Based
on our assessment, we concluded that, as of December 31,
2007, our internal control over financial reporting was
effective.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, has been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report that appears
herein.
February 29, 2008
F-59
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
REVENUES FROM PRODUCT SALES AND SERVICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
921.6
|
|
|
$
|
474.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,333.6
|
|
|
$
|
740.8
|
|
Freight and venture partners cost reimbursements
|
|
|
87.0
|
|
|
|
73.0
|
|
|
|
169.5
|
|
|
|
132.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008.6
|
|
|
|
547.6
|
|
|
|
1,503.1
|
|
|
|
873.1
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD AND OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
(582.3
|
)
|
|
|
(418.0
|
)
|
|
|
(994.3
|
)
|
|
|
(681.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SALES MARGIN
|
|
|
426.3
|
|
|
|
129.6
|
|
|
|
508.8
|
|
|
|
191.4
|
|
OTHER OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casualty recoveries
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Royalties and management fee revenue
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(52.1
|
)
|
|
|
(21.5
|
)
|
|
|
(96.6
|
)
|
|
|
(42.2
|
)
|
Gain on sale of other assets
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous net
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
(56.6
|
)
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
409.4
|
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
|
|
452.2
|
|
|
|
160.8
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES, MINORITY
INTEREST AND EQUITY LOSS FROM VENTURES
|
|
|
406.2
|
|
|
|
117.2
|
|
|
|
447.4
|
|
|
|
167.7
|
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(107.4
|
)
|
|
|
(25.8
|
)
|
|
|
(121.6
|
)
|
|
|
(39.3
|
)
|
MINORITY INTEREST (net of tax of $9.6, $1.9, $10.9 and $3.9)
|
|
|
(22.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
(25.5
|
)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
EQUITY LOSS FROM VENTURES
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
270.2
|
|
|
|
86.9
|
|
|
|
287.2
|
|
|
|
119.4
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES
|
|
$
|
269.8
|
|
|
$
|
85.5
|
|
|
$
|
285.9
|
|
|
$
|
116.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE BASIC
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE DILUTED
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
2.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES (IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
98,127
|
|
|
|
81,544
|
|
|
|
94,031
|
|
|
|
81,380
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
105,227
|
|
|
|
104,664
|
|
|
|
105,087
|
|
|
|
104,508
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-60
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
320.4
|
|
|
$
|
157.1
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
291.9
|
|
|
|
84.9
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
466.8
|
|
|
|
241.9
|
|
Supplies and other inventories
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
157.9
|
|
|
|
69.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
124.5
|
|
|
|
124.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
1,443.1
|
|
|
|
754.6
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND
DEPLETION $406.1 ($330.9 in 2007)
|
|
|
2,091.3
|
|
|
|
1,823.9
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
265.3
|
|
|
|
265.3
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
102.4
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
102.6
|
|
|
|
134.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
512.5
|
|
|
|
497.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
4,046.9
|
|
|
$
|
3,075.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
172.5
|
|
|
$
|
149.9
|
|
Accrued employment costs
|
|
|
67.7
|
|
|
|
73.2
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
71.2
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
103.2
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
State and local taxes payable
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
Environmental and mine closure obligations
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
515.3
|
|
|
|
399.6
|
|
PENSIONS
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
|
|
90.0
|
|
OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
|
|
114.2
|
|
|
|
114.8
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MINE CLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
125.0
|
|
|
|
123.2
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
238.5
|
|
|
|
189.0
|
|
SENIOR NOTES
|
|
|
325.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
TERM LOAN
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
REVOLVING CREDIT
|
|
|
160.0
|
|
|
|
240.0
|
|
CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
178.5
|
|
|
|
99.5
|
|
DEFERRED PAYMENT
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
|
|
96.2
|
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
|
141.5
|
|
|
|
107.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
2,196.0
|
|
|
|
1,659.6
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
187.1
|
|
|
|
117.8
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25% REDEEMABLE CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERPETUAL PREFERRED STOCK ISSUED 172,500 SHARES
OUTSTANDING 19,555 AND 134,715 IN 2008 AND 2007
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
134.7
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares par value $0.125 a share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 224,000,000 shares;
Issued 134,623,528 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding 102,615,681 shares (net of treasury
shares)
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
Capital in excess of par value of shares
|
|
|
149.6
|
|
|
|
116.6
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,589.5
|
|
|
|
1,316.2
|
|
Cost of 32,007,847 Common Shares in treasury (2007
47,455,922 shares)
|
|
|
(172.5
|
)
|
|
|
(255.6
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
(30.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
1,644.2
|
|
|
|
1,163.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
4,046.9
|
|
|
$
|
3,075.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-61
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287.2
|
|
|
$
|
119.4
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used)
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
78.1
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Tax contingency reserve
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss in ventures
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Derivatives and currency hedging
|
|
|
(66.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Property damage recoveries
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
Pensions and other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Environmental and closure obligations
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product inventories
|
|
|
(205.3
|
)
|
|
|
(159.0
|
)
|
Receivables and all other assets
|
|
|
(108.4
|
)
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Payables and accrued expenses
|
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
(48.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
|
|
(37.7
|
)
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of minority interest in Portman
|
|
|
(137.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(59.1
|
)
|
|
|
(46.2
|
)
|
Investment in marketable securities
|
|
|
(27.0
|
)
|
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(223.7
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Redemption of marketable securities
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from property damage insurance recoveries
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(157.2
|
)
|
|
|
(304.1
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
260.0
|
|
|
|
165.0
|
|
Repayment under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(340.0
|
)
|
|
|
(40.0
|
)
|
Borrowings under senior notes
|
|
|
325.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Contributions by minority interest
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Common stock dividends
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
Repayment of other borrowings
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities
|
|
|
225.1
|
|
|
|
112.9
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
163.3
|
|
|
|
(222.4
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
157.1
|
|
|
|
351.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
320.4
|
|
|
$
|
129.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-62
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
June 30,
2008
|
|
NOTE 1
|
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
|
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with SEC rules and
regulations and in the opinion of management, contain all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)
necessary to present fairly, the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. The interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for the full year. These unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in
Cleveland-Cliffs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007. All common shares and
per share amounts have been adjusted retroactively to reflect
the two-for-one stock split effective May 15, 2008.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
include our accounts and the accounts of our consolidated
subsidiaries, including the following significant subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Location
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
Northshore
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Iron Ore
|
Pinnacle
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Coal
|
Oak Grove
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Coal
|
Portman
|
|
Western Australia
|
|
|
85.2
|
%
|
|
Iron Ore
|
Tilden
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
85.0
|
%
|
|
Iron Ore
|
Empire
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
79.0
|
%
|
|
Iron Ore
|
United Taconite
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
70.0
|
%*
|
|
Iron Ore
|
|
|
|
* |
|
On July 11, 2008 we acquired the remaining 30 percent
from minority interest shareholders, with an effective date of
July 1, 2008. |
Intercompany accounts are eliminated upon consolidation.
On May 21, 2008, Portman authorized a tender offer to
repurchase up to 16.5 million shares, or 9.39 percent
of its common stock. On this date, we owned 80.4 percent of
the approximately 176 million shares outstanding in Portman
and indicated we would not participate in the tender buyback.
Under the share tender program, eligible shareholders could
offer to sell some or all of their shareholdings at a
fixed-price discount of 14 percent to the volume-weighted
average price of Portman shares traded on ASX during the five
trading days after the date of announcement. The tender period
closed on June 24, 2008. Under the buyback,
9.8 million fully paid ordinary shares were tendered at a
price of A$14.66 per share. The total consideration paid under
the buyback was A$143.3 million. As a result of the
buyback, our ownership interest in Portman increased from
80.4 percent to 85.2 percent. See
NOTE 4 ACQUISITIONS & OTHER
INVESTMENTS for further information.
Through various interrelated arrangements, we achieve a
45 percent economic interest in Sonoma, despite the
ownership percentages of the individual pieces of Sonoma. We own
100 percent of CAWO, 8.33 percent of the exploration
permits and applications for mining leases for the real estate
that is involved in Sonoma (Mining Assets) and
45 percent of the infrastructure, including the
construction of a rail loop and related equipment
(Non-Mining Assets). CAWO is consolidated as a
wholly-owned subsidiary, and as a result of being the primary
beneficiary, we absorb greater than 50 percent of the
residual returns and expected losses of CAWO. We record our
ownership share of the Mining Assets and Non-Mining Assets and
share in the respective costs.
Our investments in ventures include our 30 percent equity
interest in Amapá, an iron ore project located in Brazil,
our 23 percent equity interest in Hibbing, an
unincorporated joint venture in Minnesota, our
26.83 percent
F-63
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
equity interest in Wabush, an unincorporated joint venture
located in Canada, and Portmans 50 percent
non-controlling interest in Cockatoo Island.
Investments in certain joint ventures (Wabush, Cockatoo Island,
Hibbing) in which our ownership is 50 percent or less, or
in which we do not have control but have the ability to exercise
significant influence over operating and financial policies, are
accounted for under the equity method. Our share of equity
income (loss) is eliminated against consolidated product
inventory upon production, and against cost of goods sold and
operating expenses when sold. This effectively reduces our cost
for our share of the mining ventures production to its
cost, reflecting the cost-based nature of our participation in
unconsolidated ventures.
Our 30 percent ownership interest in Amapá, in which
we do not have control but have the ability to exercise
influence over operating and financial policies, is accounted
for under the equity method. Accordingly, our share of the
results from Amapá is reflected as Equity loss from
ventures on the Statements of Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Operations.
The following table presents the detail of our investments in
ventures and where those investments are classified on the
Statements of Condensed Consolidated Financial Position.
Parentheses indicate a net liability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Investment
|
|
Classification
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Amapá
|
|
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
251.8
|
|
|
$
|
247.2
|
|
Wabush
|
|
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Cockatoo
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
Hibbing(1)
|
|
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
Investments in ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
248.7
|
|
|
$
|
255.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Recorded as Other liabilities at December 31, 2007. |
The increase in the liability related to Cockatoo is primarily
attributable to an increase in the estimated asset retirement
obligation in connection with a revised assessment of the mine
closure plan.
In preparing our second quarter 2008 interim financial
statements, we determined that we should have recognized
additional revenue of approximately $55 million in our
first quarter 2008 interim financial statements. In accordance
with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133), the fair value of the
derivative asset relating to shipments made, on which pricing
was not yet settled, should have been estimated and recognized
in earnings. At the time of such shipments made during the first
quarter, we recorded revenue using 2007 international benchmark
pricing and should have recorded a derivative asset for the
expected increase in the 2008 international benchmark in
addition to the amount we recorded in revenue. Although the
amount of this adjustment is quantitatively significant to the
first quarter of 2008, the additional revenue is fully recorded
in our second quarter interim financials and is, therefore,
correctly reflected in 2008 year to date earnings by the
end of the second quarter. Additionally, we disclosed the nature
and potential amount of the adjustment in our first quarter
MD&A. Accordingly, we do not believe that this adjustment
materially misstates or warrants restatement of our first
quarter 2008 unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-64
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 2
|
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
Revenue
Recognition
North
American Iron Ore
Revenue is recognized on the sale of products when title to the
product has transferred to the customer in accordance with the
specified provisions of each term supply agreement and all
applicable criteria for revenue recognition have been satisfied.
Most of our North American Iron Ore term supply agreements
provide that title transfers to the customer when payment is
received. Under some term supply agreements, we ship the product
to ports on the lower Great Lakes
and/or to
the customers facilities prior to the transfer of title.
Certain supply agreements with one customer include provisions
for supplemental revenue or refunds based on the customers
annual steel pricing at the time the product is consumed in the
customers blast furnaces. We account for this provision as
a derivative instrument at the time of sale and record this
provision at fair value until the product is consumed and the
amounts are settled as an adjustment to revenue.
Revenue also includes reimbursement for freight charges. The
following table is a summary of reimbursement in our North
American Iron Ore operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Reimbursements for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight
|
|
$
|
24.6
|
|
|
$
|
21.1
|
|
|
$
|
41.6
|
|
|
$
|
33.3
|
|
Venture partners cost
|
|
|
53.7
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
106.2
|
|
|
|
99.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reimbursements
|
|
$
|
78.3
|
|
|
$
|
73.0
|
|
|
$
|
147.8
|
|
|
$
|
132.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
American Coal
We recognize revenue when title passes to the customer. For
domestic coal sales, this generally occurs when coal is loaded
into rail cars at the mine. For export coal sales, this
generally occurs when coal is loaded into the vessels at the
terminal. Revenue from product sales for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 included reimbursement for
freight charges of $8.7 million and $21.7 million,
respectively.
Asia-Pacific
Iron Ore
Sales revenue is recognized at the F.O.B. point, which is
generally when the product is loaded into the vessel.
Deferred
Revenue
In 2008, the terms of one of our North American Iron Ore pellet
supply agreements require a prepayment by the customer for one
estimated weekly shipment of pellets in addition to the amount
of the bi-weekly invoice for shipments previously made. In 2007,
the terms of the agreement required semi-monthly installments
equaling
1/24th of
the estimated total purchase value of the calendar-year
nomination. In both years, revenue related to this supply
agreement has been recognized when title transfers upon shipment
of the pellets. Installment amounts received in excess of sales
totaled $9.0 million and $14.6 million, which were
recorded as Deferred revenue on the Statements of
Condensed Consolidated Financial Position at June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Two of our North American Iron Ore customers purchased and paid
for approximately 1.5 million tons of iron ore pellets in
stockpiles in the fourth quarter of 2007. The customers
requested the Company to not ship the iron ore pellets until the
spring of 2008 under a fixed shipment schedule, when the Great
Lakes waterways re-opened for shipping. Freight revenue related
to these transactions of $13.8 million was deferred on the
Statements of
F-65
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidated Financial Position at December 31,
2007 and subsequently recognized in 2008 upon shipment. First
and second quarter 2008 freight revenues included
$5.3 million and $8.5 million, respectively, related
to the shipment of 0.6 million and 0.9 million
respective tons of pellets from the stockpiles.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Portman receives funds in United States currency for its iron
ore sales. Portman uses forward exchange contracts, call
options, collar options and convertible collar options,
designated as cash flow hedges, to hedge its foreign currency
exposure for a portion of its sales receipts. United States
currency is converted to Australian dollars at the currency
exchange rate in effect at the time of the transaction. The
primary objective for the use of these instruments is to reduce
the volatility of earnings due to changes in Australian and
United States currency exchange rates and to protect against
undue adverse movement in these exchange rates. At June 30,
2008, Portman had $559.2 million of outstanding exchange
rate contracts in the form of call options, collar options,
convertible collar options and forward exchange contracts with
varying maturity dates ranging from July 2008 to May 2011, with
a fair value adjustment of $44.4 million based on the
June 30, 2008 spot rate. We had $32.1 million and
$15.7 million of foreign currency hedge contracts recorded
as Derivative assets on the June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 Statements of Condensed Consolidated
Financial Position, respectively. We also had $12.3 million
and $5.9 million of foreign currency hedge contracts
recorded as non-current assets in Deposits and miscellaneous
on the Statements of Condensed Consolidated Financial
Position at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively. Changes in fair value for highly effective hedges
are recorded as a component of Other comprehensive
income. For the first six months of 2008 and 2007,
ineffectiveness resulted in a loss of $8.6 million and a
loss $2.3 million, respectively, which were recorded in
Miscellaneous-net
on the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Operations. Effective July 1, 2008, Portman de-designated
these cash flow hedges and will prospectively mark to market
future hedges through the Statements of Operations.
Certain supply agreements with one North American Iron Ore
customer provide for supplemental revenue or refunds based on
the customers average annual steel pricing at the time the
product is consumed in the customers blast furnace. The
supplemental pricing is characterized as an embedded derivative
and is required to be accounted for separately from the base
contract price. The embedded derivative instrument, which is
finalized based on a future price, is marked to fair value as a
revenue adjustment each reporting period until the pellets are
consumed and the amounts are settled. We recognized
$84.3 million and $20.0 million, in the second quarter
of 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $110.3 million and
$29.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively, as Product revenues on the
Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations
related to the supplemental payments. Derivative assets,
representing the fair value of the pricing factors, were
$125.8 million and $53.8 million, respectively, on the
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 Statements of
Condensed Consolidated Financial Position.
Certain supply agreements primarily with our Asia-Pacific
customers provide for revenue or refunds based on the ultimate
settlement of annual international benchmark pricing provisions.
The pricing provisions are characterized as freestanding
derivatives and are required to be accounted for separately once
iron ore is shipped. The derivative instrument, which is settled
and billed once the annual international benchmark price is
settled, is marked to fair value as a revenue adjustment each
reporting period based upon the estimated forward settlement
until the benchmark is actually settled. We recognized
$160.6 million as Product revenues in the Statements
of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations for both the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, related to the
2008 pricing provisions. See NOTE 1 BASIS OF
PRESENTATION regarding the portion of this revenue related to
shipments made during the three months ended March 31,
2008. The derivative instrument was settled during the second
quarter of 2008 upon settlement of annual international
benchmark prices and is therefore not reflected on the
June 30, 2008 Statement of Condensed Consolidated Financial
Position.
Effective October 19, 2007, we entered into a
$100 million fixed interest rate swap to convert a portion
of our floating rate debt to fixed rate debt. Interest on
borrowings under our credit facility is based on a floating
rate,
F-66
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
dependent in part on the LIBOR rate, exposing us to the effects
of interest rate changes. The objective of the hedge is to
eliminate the variability of cash flows in interest payments for
forecasted floating rate debt, attributable to changes in
benchmark LIBOR interest rates. To support hedge accounting, we
designate floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps as cash flow
hedges of the variability of future cash flows at the inception
of the swap contract. The amount charged to Other
comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30,
2008 was $0.8 million. Derivative liabilities, totaling
$2.2 million and $1.4 million, were recorded as
Other current liabilities on the Statements of Condensed
Consolidated Financial Position as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. There was no
ineffectiveness recorded for the interest rate swap in the first
six months of 2008.
Inventories
The following table presents the detail of our Inventories
on the Statements of Condensed Consolidated Financial
Position at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Finished
|
|
|
Work-in
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Finished
|
|
|
Work-in
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Goods
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
Goods
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
297.1
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
306.4
|
|
|
$
|
114.3
|
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
|
$
|
130.8
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
92.8
|
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
|
|
|
102.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
361.1
|
|
|
$
|
105.7
|
|
|
$
|
466.8
|
|
|
$
|
152.8
|
|
|
$
|
89.1
|
|
|
$
|
241.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our North American Iron Ore sales for the first half of the year
are influenced by winter-related shipping constraints on the
Great Lakes. While we continue to produce our products during
the winter months, we cannot ship those products via lake
freighter until the Great Lakes are passable, which causes our
inventory levels to rise during the first half of the year.
Finished goods inventory then begins to decline as sales
increase later in the year.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are based on income for financial reporting
purposes calculated using our expected annual effective rate and
reflect a current tax liability or asset for the estimated taxes
payable or recoverable on the current year tax return and
expected annual changes in deferred taxes. Any interest or
penalties on income tax are recognized as a component of income
tax expense.
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability
method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets
and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of
events that have been included in the financial statements.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the differences between the financial
statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted
tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are
expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on
deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in
the period that includes the enactment date.
We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these
assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such
determination, we consider all available positive and negative
evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax
liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning
strategies and recent financial results of operations. In the
event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our
deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net
recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the valuation
allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes. See
NOTE 10 INCOME TAXES for further information.
F-67
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value Measurements
Valuation
Hierarchy
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157) establishes a three-level
valuation hierarchy for classification of fair value
measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability
as of the measurement date.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted
prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in
active markets.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or
other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term
of the financial instrument.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is based upon other
unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value
measurement.
|
The classification of assets and liabilities within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured
at fair value are as follows:
Cash
Equivalents
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, cash
equivalents are classified within Level 1 of the valuation
hierarchy. Cash equivalents classified in Level 1 at
June 30, 2008 include money market funds. The valuation of
these instruments is determined using a market approach and is
based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in
active markets. If quoted market prices are not available, then
fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices
of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash
flows. In these instances, the valuation is based upon quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or
other inputs that are observable for substantially the full term
of the financial instrument, and the related financial
instrument is therefore classified within Level 2 of
valuation the hierarchy. Level 2 securities include
short-term investments such as commercial paper for which the
value of each investment is a function of the purchase price,
purchase yield, and maturity date.
Marketable
Securities
Where quoted prices are available in an active market,
marketable securities are classified within Level 1 of the
valuation hierarchy. Marketable securities classified in
Level 1 at June 30, 2008 include available for sale
securities. The valuation of these instruments is determined
using a market approach and is based upon unadjusted quoted
prices for identical assets in active markets.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Derivative financial instruments valued using financial models
that use as their basis readily observable market parameters are
classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such
derivative financial instruments include substantially all of
our foreign currency exchange contracts and interest rate swap
agreements. Derivative financial instruments that are valued
based upon models with significant unobservable market
parameters, and that are normally traded less actively, are
classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Non-Financial
Assets and Liabilities
We have deferred the adoption of SFAS 157 until
January 1, 2009 with respect to non-financial assets and
liabilities in accordance with the provisions of FSP
FAS 157-2.
Items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value for which
we have not applied the provisions of SFAS 157 include
goodwill, asset retirement obligations,
F-68
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
guarantees and certain other items. See NOTE 11
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS for further information.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior year consolidated financial
statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation. They included the reclassification of certain
amounts included in Miscellaneous net to
Selling, general and administrative expenses on the
Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the
sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting
the principles to be used in the preparation of financial
statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in
conformity with U.S. GAAP. SFAS 162 is effective
60 days following the SECs approval of the
PCAOBs related amendments to remove the GAAP hierarchy
from auditing standards, where it has previously resided. We are
evaluating the impact SFAS 162 will have on our
consolidated financial statements upon adoption, but do not
expect this Statement to result in a material change in current
practice.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.
This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine
the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142). The objective of this FSP is to
improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected
cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under
SFAS 141(R), and other U.S. GAAP. This FSP applies to
all intangible assets, whether acquired in a business
combination or otherwise and shall be effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years and applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired
after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. We are
currently evaluating the impact adoption of this FSP will have
on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,
(SFAS 161). This Statement amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement 133 to provide
users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of
how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an
entitys financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. The new requirements apply to derivative instruments and
non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as
hedging instruments and related hedged items accounted for under
SFAS 133. The Statement is effective for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Early
application is encouraged. We are currently evaluating the
impact adoption of this Statement will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
157-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement
No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address
Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13
(FSP 157-1).
FSP 157-1
amends SFAS 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from
its scope. In addition, on February 12, 2008, the FASB
issued FSP
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
amends SFAS 157 by delaying its effective date by one year
for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except
for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis. This pronouncement
was effective upon issuance. We have deferred the adoption of
SFAS 157 with respect to all non-financial assets and
liabilities in accordance with the provisions of this
pronouncement. On January 1, 2009, SFAS 157 will be
applied to all other fair value measurements for which the
application was deferred under FSP
FAS 157-2.
We are currently assessing the
F-69
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
impact SFAS 157 will have in relation to non-financial
assets and liabilities on our consolidated financial statements.
See NOTE 11 FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
for further information.
FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS 159) became effective on
January 1, 2008. This standard permits entities to choose
to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value. While SFAS 159 became effective for our 2008
fiscal year, we did not elect the fair value measurement option
for any of our financial assets or liabilities. Therefore,
adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
NOTE 3
|
MARKETABLE
SECURITIES
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Portman acquired
22 million shares of Golden West, a Western Australia iron
ore exploration company, which represents approximately
19.9 percent of its outstanding shares. Acquisition of the
shares represents an investment of approximately
$27 million. Golden West owns the Wiluna West exploration
ore project in Western Australia, containing a resource of
119 million metric tons of ore. The purchase provides
Portman a strategic interest in Golden West and Wiluna West. We
do not exercise significant influence, and at June 30,
2008, the investment is classified as an available-for-sale
security.
Our marketable securities are classified as either
held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. We account for
marketable securities in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115).
SFAS 115 addresses the accounting and reporting for
investments in fixed maturity securities and for equity
securities with readily determinable fair values. We determine
the appropriate classification of debt and equity securities at
the time of purchase and re-evaluate such designation as of each
balance sheet date. In addition, we review our investments on an
ongoing basis for indications of possible impairment. We review
impairments in accordance with
EITF 03-1
and FSP
SFAS 115-1
and 124-1,
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments, to determine the
classification of the impairment as temporary or
other-than-temporary. Once identified, the determination of
whether the impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary
requires significant judgment. The primary factors that we
consider in classifying the impairment include the extent and
time the fair value of each investment has been below cost. If a
decline in fair value is judged other than temporary, the basis
of the individual security is written down to fair value as a
new cost basis, and the amount of the write-down is included as
a realized loss. At June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, we had $102.8 million and $74.6 million,
respectively, of marketable securities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Held to maturity current
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
Held to maturity non-current
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
Available for sale non-current
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
102.8
|
|
|
$
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-70
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Marketable securities classified as held-to-maturity are
measured and stated at amortized cost. The amortized cost, gross
unrealized gains and losses and fair value of investment
securities held-to-maturity at June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
Floating rate notes
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
26.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
|
$
|
23.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
Floating rate notes
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity at June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 have contractual maturities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asset backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
1 to 5 years
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
1 to 5 years
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities classified as available for sale are
stated at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses
included in Other comprehensive income. The amortized
cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of
investment securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Equity securities (without contractual maturity)
|
|
$
|
41.2
|
|
|
$
|
34.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
76.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Equity securities (without contractual maturity)
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.9
|
|
We intend to hold our shares of available-for-sale equity
securities indefinitely.
F-71
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 4
|
ACQUISITIONS &
OTHER INVESTMENTS
|
In accordance with FASB Statement No. 141, Business
Combinations (SFAS 141) we allocate the
cost of acquisitions to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the
cost over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded
as goodwill.
PinnOak
On July 31, 2007, we completed our acquisition of
100 percent of PinnOak, a privately-owned United States
producer of high-quality, low-volatile metallurgical coal. The
acquisition furthers our growth strategy and expands our
diversification of products for the integrated steel industry.
The purchase price of PinnOak and its subsidiary operating
companies was $450 million in cash, of which
$108.4 million is deferred until December 31, 2009,
plus the assumption of approximately $160 million in debt,
which was repaid at closing. The deferred payment was discounted
using a six percent credit-adjusted risk free rate and was
recorded as $93.7 million of Deferred payment on the
Statements of Consolidated Financial Position as of
July 31, 2007. The purchase agreement also includes a
contingent earn-out, which ranges from $0 to approximately
$300 million dependent upon PinnOaks performance in
2008 and 2009. The earn-out, if any, would be payable in 2010
and treated as additional purchase price. The assets acquired
consist primarily of coal mining rights and mining equipment and
are included in our North American Coal segment.
PinnOaks operations include two complexes comprising three
underground mines the Pinnacle and Green Ridge mines
in southern West Virginia and the Oak Grove mine near
Birmingham, Alabama. Combined, the mines have rated capacity to
produce 6.5 million tons of premium-quality metallurgical
coal annually.
The Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Position of the Company as of June 30, 2008 reflect the
acquisition of PinnOak, effective July 31, 2007, under the
purchase method of accounting. The total cost of the acquisition
has been allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the date of
the acquisition. The allocation resulted in an excess of fair
value of acquired net assets over cost. As the acquisition
involved a contingent earn-out, a liability has been recorded
totaling $178.5 million, representing the lesser of the
maximum amount of contingent consideration or the excess prior
to the pro rata allocation of purchase price. We finalized the
purchase price allocation in the second quarter of 2008. A
comparison of the finalized purchase price allocation to the
initial allocation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finalized
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
80.8
|
|
|
|
77.2
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
156.7
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
Mineral rights
|
|
|
676.5
|
|
|
|
619.9
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
Asset held for sale
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
931.7
|
|
|
$
|
833.7
|
|
|
$
|
98.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
268.0
|
|
|
|
171.2
|
|
|
|
96.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
330.5
|
|
|
|
232.5
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
|
601.2
|
|
|
|
601.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjustment since our initial allocation reduced coal
inventory by $1.1 million to reflect inventory survey
adjustments, increased supplies inventory by $4.8 million
to reflect the capitalization of supplies inventory, increased
property, plant and equipment by $23.7 million and
increased mineral rights by $56.6 million to reflect
F-72
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
market-based valuation adjustments. The asset held for sale
represents the estimated fair value less cost to sell of the
assets of a pond fines recovery operation. The sale was
completed on February 15, 2008. The increase in current
liabilities reflects additional accruals for non-income taxes.
The increase in long-term liabilities represents adjustments to
the contingent earn-out, $78.5 million, and an increase in
deferred tax liabilities resulting from further assessment of
the purchase price for tax purposes, $18.0 million.
Portman
Share Repurchase
On May 21, 2008, Portman authorized a tender offer to
repurchase up to 16.5 million shares, or 9.39 percent
of its common stock. On this date, we owned 80.4 percent of
the approximately 176 million shares outstanding in Portman
and indicated we would not participate in the tender buyback.
Under the share tender program, eligible shareholders could
offer to sell some or all of their shareholdings at a
fixed-price discount of 14 percent to the volume-weighted
average price of Portman shares traded on ASX during the five
trading days after the date of announcement. The tender period
closed on June 24, 2008. Under the buyback,
9.8 million fully paid ordinary shares were tendered at a
price of A$14.66 per share. The total consideration paid under
the buyback was A$143.3 million. As a result of the
buyback, our ownership interest in Portman increased from
80.4 percent to 85.2 percent.
The transaction constituted a step acquisition of a
noncontrolling interest. In accordance with SFAS 141 we
have accounted for the acquisition of the minority interests in
Portman by the purchase method. As of the date of a step
acquisition of the minority interest, the then historical cost
basis of the minority interest balance was reduced to the extent
of the percentage interest sold, or $49.0 million, and a
corresponding deferred tax liability with a preliminary fair
value assignment of $38.0 million was recorded to reflect
the tax effect of the acquisition. The remaining purchase price
over the net assets acquired was preliminarily assigned to
Property, Plant and Equipment resulting in an increase of
$126.8 million on the Statement of Condensed Consolidated
Financial Position at June 30, 2008. We are in the process
of conducting a valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed related to the acquisition, most notably, inventory,
mineral rights, and property, plant and equipment. Accordingly,
allocation of the purchase price is subject to modification in
the future.
|
|
NOTE 5
|
DEBT AND
CREDIT FACILITIES
|
On June 25, 2008, we entered into a $325 million
private placement consisting of $270 million of
6.31 percent Five-Year
Senior Notes due June 15, 2013, and $55 million of
6.59 percent Seven-Year
Senior Notes due June 15, 2015. Interest will be paid on
the notes for both tranches on June 15 and December 15 until
their respective maturities. The notes are unsecured obligations
with interest and principal amounts guaranteed by certain of our
domestic subsidiaries. The notes and guarantees are not required
to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and have been placed with qualified institutional investors. We
used the proceeds to repay senior unsecured indebtedness and for
general corporate purposes.
The terms of the note purchase agreement contain customary
covenants that require compliance with certain financial
covenants based on: (1) debt to earnings ratio and
(2) interest coverage ratio. As of June 30, 2008, we
were in compliance with the covenants in the note purchase
agreement.
On August 17, 2007, we entered into a five-year unsecured
credit facility with a syndicate of 13 financial institutions.
The facility provides $800 million in borrowing capacity,
comprised of $200 million in term loans and
$600 million in revolving loans, swing loans and letters of
credit. Loans are drawn with a choice of interest rates and
maturities, subject to the terms of the agreement. Interest
rates are either (1) a range from LIBOR plus
0.45 percent to LIBOR plus 1.125 percent based on debt
and earning levels or (2) the prime rate or the prime rate
plus 1.125 percent, based on debt and earnings.
The credit facility has two financial covenants based on:
(1) debt to earnings ratio and (2) interest coverage
ratio. As of June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with the
covenants in the credit agreement.
F-73
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of June 30, 2008, $160 million was drawn in
revolving loans and the principal amount of letter of credit
obligations totaled $19.4 million under the credit
facility. We had $200 million drawn in term loans;
$420.6 million of borrowing capacity was available under
the $800 million credit facility. The weighted average
interest rate for outstanding revolving and term loans under the
credit facility was 3.33 percent as of June 30, 2008.
After the effect of interest rate hedging, the weighted average
annual borrowing rate was 3.85 percent.
Effective June 23, 2008, Portman added a A$120 million
cash facility to its existing facility agreement, under which
Portman continues to maintain a A$40 million multi-option
facility. The facilities have floating interest rates of
20 basis points and 75 basis points, respectively,
over the
90-day bank
bill swap rate in Australia. At June 30, 2008, the
outstanding bank commitments totaled A$12.5 million,
reducing borrowing capacity to A$27.5 million on the
A$40 million facility. No funds have been utilized on the
A$120 million facility. The A$120 million facility is
available until September 30, 2008. Both facilities operate
under the same financial covenants of Portman: (1) debt to
earnings ratio and (2) interest coverage ratio. As of
June 30, 2008, Portman was in compliance with the covenants
of the credit facilities.
In 2005, Portman secured five-year financing from its customers
in China as part of its long-term sales agreements to assist
with the funding of the expansion of its Koolyanobbing mining
operations. The borrowings, totaling $5.5 million and
$6.2 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively, accrue interest annually at five percent.
The borrowings require a principal payment of approximately
$0.8 million plus accrued interest to be made
January 31, 2009, with the balance due in full on
January 31, 2010.
At June 30, 2008, Amapá had long-term project debt
outstanding of approximately $338 million for which we have
provided a several guarantee on our 30 percent share.
Amapá has engaged in ongoing discussions with its lenders
regarding loan amendments to address several loan covenant
violations related to project delays, higher construction
expenditures, debt-to-equity ratios and deliveries under its
long-term supply agreement with an operator of an iron ore
pelletizing plant in the Kingdom of Bahrain. In addition, at
June 30, 2008, Amapá had total short-term loans
outstanding of $188.9 million. We subsequently provided a
several guarantee in July 2008 on our 30 percent share of
the total debt outstanding, or $159.1 million.
|
|
NOTE 6
|
SEGMENT
REPORTING
|
Our company is organized and managed according to product
category and geographic location: North American Iron Ore,
North American Coal, Asia-Pacific Iron Ore, Asia-Pacific Coal
and Latin American Iron Ore. The North American Iron Ore
segment is comprised of our interests in six North American
mines that provide iron ore to the integrated steel industry.
The North American Coal segment is comprised of our three North
American coal mines that provide metallurgical coal to the
integrated steel industry. The Asia-Pacific Iron Ore segment,
comprised of our interests in Portman, is located in Western
Australia and provides iron ore to steel producers in China and
Japan. There are no intersegment revenues.
The Asia-Pacific Coal operating segment is comprised of our
45 percent economic interest in Sonoma, located in
Queensland, Australia, which is in the early stages of
production. The Latin American Iron Ore operating segment is
comprised of our 30 percent Amapá interest in
Brazil, which is also in the early stages of production. As a
result, the Asia-Pacific Coal and Latin American Iron Ore
operating segments do not meet reportable segment disclosure
requirements and therefore are not separately reported.
We evaluate segment performance based on sales margin, defined
as revenues less cost of goods sold identifiable to each
segment. This measure of operating performance is an effective
measurement as we focus on reducing production costs throughout
the Company.
F-74
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents a summary of our reportable
segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales and services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
643.4
|
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
$
|
432.8
|
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
$
|
922.2
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
$
|
658.0
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155.4
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
268.2
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
114.8
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
385.7
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
215.1
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues from product sales and services for reportable
segments
|
|
$
|
1,008.6
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
547.6
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,503.1
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
873.1
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
272.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
104.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
337.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
141.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
160.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales margin
|
|
|
426.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, minority
interest and equity loss from ventures
|
|
$
|
406.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
117.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
447.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
167.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
78.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital additions(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital additions
|
|
$
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
85.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes capital lease additions. |
F-75
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of assets by segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Segment assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
$
|
1,521.3
|
|
|
$
|
968.9
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
822.8
|
|
|
|
773.2
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
1,270.1
|
|
|
|
1,083.8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
432.7
|
|
|
|
249.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,046.9
|
|
|
$
|
3,075.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7
|
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
The following are the components of comprehensive income for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
270.2
|
|
|
$
|
86.9
|
|
|
$
|
287.2
|
|
|
$
|
119.4
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net gain on marketable securities net of
tax
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
Amortization of net periodic benefit net of tax
|
|
|
(23.9
|
)
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap net of
tax
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
91.1
|
|
|
|
58.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
310.8
|
|
|
$
|
127.5
|
|
|
$
|
378.3
|
|
|
$
|
177.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-76
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 8
|
PENSIONS
AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
The following are the components of defined benefit pension and
OPEB expense for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007:
Defined
Benefit Pension Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
(24.6
|
)
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)
|
Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service costs
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Net actuarial losses
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
$
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Postretirement Benefits Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service credits
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
Net actuarial losses
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Transition asset
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-77
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 9
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
AND MINE CLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
|
We had environmental and mine closure liabilities of
$131.8 million and $130.8 million at June 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Payments in the
first six months of 2008 were $3.8 million compared with
$9.2 million for the full year in 2007. The following is a
summary of the obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
Mine closure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTVSMC
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
Operating mines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Iron Ore
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
North American Coal
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mine closure
|
|
|
118.2
|
|
|
|
118.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total environmental and mine closure obligations
|
|
|
131.8
|
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term environmental and mine closure obligations
|
|
$
|
125.0
|
|
|
$
|
123.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
The Rio
Tinto Mine Site
The Rio Tinto Mine Site is a historic underground copper mine
located near Mountain City, Nevada, where tailings were placed
in Mill Creek, a tributary to the Owyhee River. Site
investigation and remediation work is being conducted in
accordance with a Consent Order between the Nevada DEP and the
RTWG composed of Cliffs, Atlantic Richfield Company, Teck
Cominco American Incorporated, and E. I. du Pont de Nemours and
Company. The estimated costs of the available remediation
alternatives currently range from approximately
$10.0 million to $30.5 million. In recognition of the
potential for an NRD claim, the parties are actively pursuing a
global settlement that would include the EPA and encompass both
the remedial action and the NRD issues. We have increased our
reserve most recently in the second quarter of 2008 by
$3.0 million to reflect revised cleanup estimates and cost
allocation associated with our anticipated share of the eventual
remediation costs based on a consideration of the various
remedial measures and related cost estimates, which are
currently under review. The expense was included in Selling,
general and administrative in the Statements of Consolidated
Operations.
Mine
Closure
The mine closure obligations are for our four consolidated North
American operating iron ore mines, our three consolidated North
American operating coal mines, our Asia-Pacific operating iron
ore mines, the coal mine at Sonoma and a closed operation
formerly known as LTVSMC. The LTVSMC closure obligation results
from an October 2001 transaction where subsidiaries of the
Company received a net payment of $50 million and certain
other assets and assumed environmental and certain facility
closure obligations of $50 million. Obligations have
declined to $21.1 million at June 30, 2008.
The accrued closure obligation for our active mining operations
provides for contractual and legal obligations associated with
the eventual closure of the mining operations. The accretion of
the liability and amortization of the related fixed asset is
recognized over the estimated mine lives for each location. The
following represents a
F-78
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
rollforward of our asset retirement obligation liability for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
96.0
|
|
|
$
|
62.7
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
PinnOak acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
Sonoma investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Reclassification adjustment
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Exchange rate changes
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Revision in estimated cash flows
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
97.1
|
|
|
$
|
96.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a
12-month
rollforward of our asset retirement obligation at
December 31, 2007. |
Our total tax provision from continuing operations for the first
six months of 2008 of $121.6 million is comprised of
$71.4 million related to U.S. operations and
$50.2 million related to foreign operations. Our 2008
expected effective tax rate related to continuing operations is
approximately 26 percent. The effective rate reflects
benefits from deductions for percentage depletion in excess of
cost depletion related to U.S. operations as well as
benefits derived from operations outside the U.S., which are
taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate of
35 percent.
At June 30, 2008 our valuation allowance maintained against
certain gross deferred tax assets increased by $4.1 million
to fully offset an increase in future tax benefits for first
quarter losses of certain foreign operations for which future
utilization is currently uncertain.
At June 30, 2008, cumulative undistributed earnings of
foreign subsidiaries included in consolidated retained earnings
continue to be indefinitely reinvested in international
operations. Accordingly, no provision has been made for deferred
taxes related to a future repatriation of these earnings, nor is
it practicable to estimate the amount of income taxes that would
have to be provided if we were to conclude that such earnings
will be remitted in the foreseeable future.
The following table details the changes in unrecognized tax
benefits from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits balance as of January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
Increases for tax positions in prior years
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Increases for tax positions in current year
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits balance as of June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008 and January 1, 2008, we had
$20.9 million and $15.2 million, respectively, of
unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the
effective tax rate. It is reasonably possible that an additional
decrease of $14.8 million in unrecognized tax benefit
obligations will occur within the next 12 months due to
expected settlements with the taxing authorities. We recognize
potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized
tax benefits in income tax expense. During the six months ended
June 30, 2008, we accrued an
F-79
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
additional $4.7 million of interest relating to the
unrecognized tax benefits, $1.0 million of which was due to
the settlement reached with a foreign taxing authority.
Tax years that remain subject to examination are years 2003
forward for the United States, 1993 forward for Canada and 1994
forward for Australia.
|
|
NOTE 11
|
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 as of January 1,
2008, with respect to financial instruments. We have deferred
the adoption of SFAS 157 with respect to non-financial
assets and liabilities in accordance with the provisions of FSP
FAS 157-2.
Items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value for which
we have not applied the provisions of SFAS 157 include
goodwill, asset retirement obligations, guarantees and certain
other items. No transition adjustment was necessary as of
January 1, 2008 upon the adoption of SFAS 157.
The following represents financial assets and liabilities of the
Company measured at fair value on a recurring basis in
accordance with SFAS 157 at June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/Liabilities
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
170.2
|
|
|
$
|
28.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
198.8
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125.8
|
|
|
|
125.8
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
246.2
|
|
|
$
|
73.0
|
|
|
$
|
125.8
|
|
|
$
|
445.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets classified in Level 1 at June 30,
2008 include money market funds and available for sale
securities. The valuation of these instruments is determined
using a market approach, taking into account current interest
rates and creditworthiness, and is based upon unadjusted quoted
prices for identical assets in active markets.
The valuation of financial assets and liabilities classified in
Level 2 is determined using a market approach based upon
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets, or other inputs that are observable for substantially
the full term of the financial instrument. Level 2
securities include short-term investments such as commercial
paper for which the value of each investment is a function of
the purchase price, purchase yield and maturity date. Derivative
financial instruments valued using financial models that use as
their basis readily observable market parameters are also
classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. At
June 30, 2008, such derivative financial instruments
include substantially all of our foreign currency exchange hedge
contracts and interest rate exchange agreements. The fair value
of the interest rate swap and forward currency contracts is
based on a forward LIBOR curve and forward market prices,
respectively, and represents the estimated amount we would
receive to terminate these agreements at the reporting date,
taking into account current interest rates and creditworthiness.
The derivative financial asset classified as a Level 3 is
an embedded derivative instrument included in certain supply
agreements with one of our customers. The agreements include
provisions for supplemental revenue or refunds based on the
customers annual steel pricing at the time the product is
consumed in the customers blast
F-80
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
furnaces. We account for this provision as a derivative
instrument at the time of sale and record this provision at fair
value based on an income approach when the product is consumed
and the amounts are settled as an adjustment to revenue. The
fair value of the instrument is determined based on a future
price of the average hot rolled steel price at certain
steelmaking facilities and other inflationary indices.
Substantially all of the financial assets and liabilities are
carried at fair value or contracted amounts that approximate
fair value. We had no financial assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a non-recurring basis in accordance with
SFAS 157 at June 30, 2008.
The following represents a reconciliation of the changes in fair
value of financial instruments measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) during the first half of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Assets
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
63.9
|
|
|
$
|
53.8
|
|
Total gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
244.9
|
|
|
|
270.9
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(183.0
|
)
|
|
|
(198.9
|
)
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
125.8
|
|
|
$
|
125.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings
attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses on
assets still held at June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
84.3
|
|
|
$
|
110.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and losses included in earnings are reported in Product
revenue on the Statements of Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008.
With respect to changes in Level 3 financial instruments
during the first half of 2008, we had freestanding derivatives
related to certain supply agreements primarily with our
Asia-Pacific customers that provide for revenue or refunds based
on the ultimate settlement of annual international benchmark
pricing provisions. The pricing provisions are characterized as
freestanding derivatives and are required to be accounted for
separately once iron ore is shipped. The derivative instrument,
which is settled and billed once the annual international
benchmark price is settled, is marked to fair value as a revenue
adjustment each reporting period based upon the estimated
forward settlement until the benchmark is actually settled. The
fair value of the instrument is determined based on the forward
price expectation of the annual international benchmark price.
We recognized $160.6 million as Product revenues in
the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations
for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
related to the 2008 pricing provisions. The derivative
instrument was settled during the second quarter of 2008 upon
settlement of annual international benchmark prices and is
therefore not reflected on the June 30, 2008 Statement of
Condensed Consolidated Financial Position.
2008
Performance Shares
On March 10, 2008, the Compensation and Organization
Committee (Committee) of the Board of Directors
approved a grant under our shareholder approved 2007 ICE Plan
for the performance period
2008-2010.
The grant for executive officers consisted of 75 percent of
the total value of the grant in performance shares and
25 percent in
F-81
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
restricted share units. The grant included a total of 159,480
performance shares and 56,520 restricted share units. The grant
of performance shares assumes 100 percent attainment of
performance goals as determined by the Committee. The restricted
share units are subject to continued employment, are retention
based, will vest at the end of the performance period for the
performance shares, and are payable in shares at a time
determined by the Committee in its discretion. The performance
shares granted under the ICE Plan vest over a period of three
years and measure performance for the period
2008-2010 on
the basis of two factors, relative total shareholder return and
three-year cumulative free cash flow, and are paid out in common
shares. Upon the occurrence of a change in control, all
performance shares and restricted share units granted to a
participant will vest and become nonforfeitable and will be paid
out in stock.
2006
and 2007 Performance Share Modifications
On May 12, 2008, the Committee of the Board of Directors
approved two changes to the calculations used to determine the
final payouts under the performance shares granted in 2006 (for
the
2006-2008
performance period) and 2007 (for the
2007-2009
performance period) under our 1992 ICE Plan (as Amended and
Restated as of May 13, 1997) and our 2007 ICE Plan,
respectively.
The first change approved by the Committee relates to the
calculation of total shareholder return (TSR)
relative to the companies in our peer group. Under the plan
modification, if any of the companies in the peer group are
removed because the company has ceased to be publicly traded or
has experienced a major restructuring by reason of a
Chapter 11 filing or a spin-off of more than
50 percent of any such companys assets, the
calculation will be based upon the greater of (1) TSR based
only on the remaining companies in the original peer group or
(2) TSR based on the remaining companies in the original
peer group plus the addition of the Standard & Poors
Metals and Minerals Exchange Traded Fund.
The second change approved by the Committee is in relation to
the 2006 performance share plan year and relates to the method
of evaluating performance during the applicable period. The
Committee had previously adopted a new methodology under the
2007 ICE Plan for the calculation of TSR based on the Cumulative
Method (where the calculation of TSR is based on the cumulative
TSR between the start and the end of the performance period).
Prior to this change, TSR was based on the Quarterly Method
(where the calculation of TSR is based on a cumulative
quarter-by-quarter
basis), which effectively weighted the early quarters in the
period more heavily than later quarters. Executive officers were
given a choice as to which of these methods would apply to their
grants of Performance Shares made in 2005 (for the
2005-2007
performance period) and 2006 (for the
2006-2008
performance period). On May 12, 2008, the Committee
determined that payouts with respect to the
2006-2008
performance period would be based on the Cumulative Method
unless the payout would be greater under the Quarterly Method,
in which case the Quarterly Method would be used for those
payouts. As a result of these modifications, we recorded
additional stock-based compensation expense of $2.4 million
in Selling, general and administrative expenses on the Statement
of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
Determination
of Fair Value
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of
grant using a Monte Carlo simulation to forecast relative TSR
performance. Consistent with the guidelines of SFAS 123(R),
a correlation matrix of historic and projected stock prices was
developed for both the Company and its predetermined peer group
of mining and metals companies. The fair value assumes that
performance goals will be achieved. If such goals are not met,
no compensation cost is recognized and any recognized
compensation cost is reversed.
The expected term of the grant represents the time from the
grant date to the end of the service period. We estimated the
volatility of our common stock and that of the peer group of
mining and metals companies using daily price intervals for all
companies. The risk-free interest rate is the rate at the
valuation date on zero-coupon government bonds, with a term
commensurate with the remaining life of the performance plans.
F-82
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following assumptions were utilized to estimate the fair
value for the 2008 plan year and the 2006 and 2007 plan year
modifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant/
|
|
|
|
Grant/
|
|
Modification
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-Free
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modification
|
|
|
|
Modification
|
|
Date Market
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Date Market
|
|
Plan Year
|
|
Date
|
|
Price(1)
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Price)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
March 10, 2008
|
|
|
52.59
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
|
|
58.23
|
%
|
2007
|
|
May 12, 2008
|
|
|
90.28
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
|
|
143.70
|
%
|
2006
|
|
May 12, 2008
|
|
|
90.28
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
|
|
143.95
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted to reflect 2:1 stock split that occurred on
May 15, 2008. |
The table below illustrates the change in the fair value as a
result of the 2006 and 2007 plan year modifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Modification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation
|
|
Pre-Modification
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Revised
|
|
Plan Year
|
|
Method(1)
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
$
|
122.55
|
|
|
$
|
7.18
|
|
|
$
|
129.73
|
|
2006
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
30.45
|
|
|
|
99.28
|
|
|
|
129.73
|
|
2007
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
128.71
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
129.96
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a result of the choice given to executive officers between
the Cumulative and Quarterly methods under the 2006 Plan, the
pre-modification fair value for this plan is presented
separately for each election. This was not an option under the
2007 plan, and therefore, a single pre-modification fair value
is presented. |
Common
Stock
On March 11, 2008, a
two-for-one
stock split of our common shares was declared. As a result, each
shareholder of record on May 1, 2008 received one
additional share of our common stock for every share held. The
new shares were distributed on May 15, 2008. Pursuant to
the effectuation of the stock split, the par value of our common
stock was adjusted from $0.25 per share to $0.125 per share, and
the number of authorized common shares was increased accordingly
from 112 million to 224 million shares. As a result of
the stock split, the preferred stock conversion rate was also
adjusted from 66.1881 to 133.0646. The new conversion rate
equates to a conversion price of $7.52 per common share.
On May 13, 2008, a cash dividend of $0.0875 per common
share was declared. This dividend rate is the same as the cash
dividend declared on our common stock in the first quarter of
2008, and represents an increase of 40 percent from the
rate declared in the comparable quarter of 2007. The cash
dividend was paid on June 2, 2008 to each shareholder of
record. The cash dividend was adjusted pursuant to the
previously announced
two-for-one
common stock split.
Preferred
Stock
On January 17, 2008, 24,010 preferred shares were converted
to 1,589,176 shares of common stock at a conversion rate of
66.1881. In the second quarter of 2008, an additional 91,150
preferred shares were converted to 12,128,838 shares of
common stock at a conversion rate of 133.0646, reducing our
preferred stock outstanding to
F-83
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
19,555 shares. The following is a summary of the activity
of preferred stock for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and the year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Number of preferred shares at beginning of the period
|
|
|
134,715
|
|
|
|
172,300
|
|
Number of preferred shares converted
|
|
|
115,160
|
|
|
|
37,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of preferred shares at end of the period
|
|
|
19,555
|
|
|
|
134,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption value at end of the period (in millions)
|
|
$
|
310.1
|
|
|
$
|
898.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of common shares issued from Treasury upon conversion
|
|
|
13,718,012
|
|
|
|
4,975,296
|
|
On May 13, 2008, a scheduled dividend payment was
authorized on our 3.25 percent redeemable cumulative
convertible perpetual preferred stock, and a cash payment of
$8.125 per share was paid on July 15, 2008, to preferred
stock shareholders of record on July 1, 2008.
|
|
NOTE 14
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
A summary of the calculation of earnings per common share on a
basic and diluted basis follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
270.2
|
|
|
$
|
86.9
|
|
|
$
|
287.2
|
|
|
$
|
119.4
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income applicable to common shares
|
|
$
|
269.8
|
|
|
$
|
85.5
|
|
|
$
|
285.9
|
|
|
$
|
116.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
98.1
|
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
|
|
94.0
|
|
|
|
81.4
|
|
Employee stock plans
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
105.2
|
|
|
|
104.6
|
|
|
|
105.1
|
|
|
|
104.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share Basic
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
2.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have been named, along with two of our wholly owned
subsidiaries, Cliffs Mining Company and Wabush Iron Co. Limited,
as defendants, along with U.S. Steel Canada Inc. (formerly
Stelco Inc.), HLE Mining Limited Partnership and HLE Mining GP
Inc. (collectively, U.S. Steel), in an action
brought before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice by Dofasco.
The action pertains to a contemplated transaction whereby
Dofasco
and/or
certain of its affiliates would purchase our ownership interests
and those of U.S. Steel in Wabush. After six months of
negotiations with no definitive agreements reached, both we and
U.S. Steel determined to withdraw from negotiations and
retain our respective ownership interests in Wabush. Notice of
the withdrawal was delivered to Dofasco on March 3, 2008.
On March 20, 2008, Dofasco commenced this action against
both Cliffs and U.S. Steel. Dofascos statement of
claim demands specific performance of an alleged binding
contract for Cliffs and U.S. Steel to sell their respective
interests in Wabush with equitable compensation in the amount of
C$427 million or, in the alternative, general
F-84
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
damages in the amount of C$1.8 billion. We strongly
disagree with Dofascos allegations and intend to defend
this case vigorously. On May 14, 2008 U.S. Steel filed
a Notice of Motion to dismiss the action. We filed an identical
Notice of Motion on May 15, 2008. A two day hearing was
held on our respective motions on June 23 and 24, 2008, and we
expect a ruling from the court during the third quarter of 2008.
We are periodically involved in litigation incidental to our
operations. We believe that any pending litigation will not
result in a material liability in relation to our consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
NOTE 16
|
LEASE
OBLIGATIONS
|
We lease certain mining, production and other equipment under
operating and capital leases. The leases are for varying
lengths, generally at market interest rates and contain purchase
and/or
renewal options at the end of the terms. Future minimum payments
under capital leases and non-cancellable operating leases at
June 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008 (July 1 December 31)
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
2009
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
2010
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
2011
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
2012
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
52.3
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
111.9
|
|
|
$
|
97.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts representing interest
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
82.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum capital lease payments of $111.9 million
include $1.8 million and $110.1 million, for our North
American Iron Ore segment and Asia-Pacific Iron Ore segment,
respectively. Total minimum operating lease payments of
$97.1 million include $79.8 million for our North
American Iron Ore segment, $16.3 million for our
Asia-Pacific Iron Ore segment and $1.0 million for our
North American Coal segment.
|
|
NOTE 17
|
CASH FLOW
INFORMATION
|
A reconciliation of capital additions to cash paid for capital
expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Capital additions
|
|
$
|
85.9
|
|
|
$
|
44.2
|
|
Cash paid for capital expenditures
|
|
|
59.1
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash accruals
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
26.8
|
|
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-85
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS
INC AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 18
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
Capital
Improvement and Capacity Expansion Projects
On July 12, 2008 we announced a capital expansion project
at our Empire and Tilden mines in Michigans Upper
Peninsula. The project, which requires approximately
$290.4 million of incremental capital investment, is
expected to allow the Empire mine to produce at three million
tons annually through 2017 and increase Tilden mine production
by more than two million tons annually. This incremental
production is expected to result in total equity production of
over 23 million tons annually for our North American Iron
Ore segment. Empire was previously projected to exhaust reserves
in early 2011. As part of the capacity expansion, we will also
mine additional ore from our Tilden mine, located adjacent to
Empire, and process it utilizing additional processing capacity
at Empire. Utilization of this capacity will enable Tilden to
increase production to more than 10 million tons annually,
of which 8.5 million tons represents our share. The work is
expected to begin in the last quarter of 2008, with capital
expenditures of $69.0 million, $161.5 million and
$59.9 million projected in 2008, 2009 and 2010,
respectively.
In July 2008, we also incurred an additional capital commitment
for the purchase of a new longwall plow system at our Pinnacle
mine in West Virginia. The equipment, which requires a capital
investment of approximately $90 million, will replace the
current longwall plow system in an effort to reduce maintenance
costs and increase production at the mine. Capital expenditures
related to this purchase will be made in 2008 and 2009, with the
equipment expected to be delivered in 2009.
Purchase
of Remaining Interest in United Taconite
On July 11, 2008 we signed and closed on the acquisition of
the remaining 30 percent interest in United Taconite,
with an effective date of July 1, 2008. Upon consummation
of the purchase, our ownership interest increased from
70 percent to 100 percent. Consideration paid for the
acquisition is a combination of $100 million in cash,
approximately 1.5 million of our common shares, and
1.2 million tons of iron ore pellets to be provided
throughout 2008 and 2009. The consolidation of the United
Taconite minority interest, together with our Northshore
property, represents two wholly-owned iron ore assets in North
America.
Announced
Merger with Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
On July 16, 2008, we announced the approval of a definitive
merger agreement with Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. under which
we will acquire all outstanding shares of Alpha in a cash and
stock transaction valued at approximately $10 billion.
Under the terms of the agreement, for each share of Alpha common
stock, Alpha stockholders would receive 0.95 of our common
shares and $22.23 in cash. The aggregate consideration comprises
$1.7 billion in cash and approximately 71 million new
common shares. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is providing an
underwriting commitment for up to $1.9 billion which will
be used to finance the transaction.
The combined company, which will be renamed Cliffs Natural
Resources, will become one of the largest U.S. mining
companies and be positioned as a leading diversified mining and
natural resources company. Cliffs Natural Resources mine
portfolio will include nine iron ore facilities and more than 60
coal mines located across North America, South America and
Australia. The combined companys significant position in
both iron ore and metallurgical coal will make it a major
supplier to the global steel industry, as well as provide a
platform for further diversification both geographically and in
terms of the mineral and resource products it sells. Upon
completion of the transaction, we anticipate the combined
company to have annual sales volume in excess of 30 million
tons of iron ore and nearly 18 million tons of
metallurgical coal. In addition to leading positions in iron ore
and metallurgical coal, the company will also ship approximately
17 million tons of thermal coal, which is used primarily
for electricity generation by utility companies.
The transaction is subject to shareholder approval as well as
the satisfaction of customary closing conditions and regulatory
approvals, including expiration or termination of the applicable
waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. The transaction is expected
to close by the end of 2008.
F-86
The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for
both parties. Specifically, if we terminate the agreement
because Alphas Board of Directors withdraws its
recommendation of the deal, or Alpha terminates to accept an
alternative transaction, or if the merger agreement is
terminated and Alpha enters into or consummates another
transaction within one year of such termination, then Alpha will
have to pay us a $350 million termination fee. Similarly,
if Alpha terminates the agreement because our Board of Directors
withdraws its recommendation of the deal, or if the agreement is
terminated and we enter into or consummate another transaction
within one year of such termination, then we will have to pay
Alpha a $350 million termination fee. In addition, if
Alphas stockholders do not approve the transaction, Alpha
will have to pay us a $100 million termination fee, and if
our shareholders do not approve the transaction, we will have to
pay Alpha a $100 million termination fee.
Preferred
Stock Conversion
On July 16, 2008, 19,350 preferred shares were converted to
2,574,800 shares of common stock at a conversion rate of
133.0646, reducing our preferred stock outstanding to
205 shares with a redemption value of $2.8 million on
that date. Total common shares are being issued out of treasury.
F-87
ANNEX
A
Execution
Version
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
BY AND AMONG
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC,
DAILY DOUBLE ACQUISITION, INC.
AND
ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.
Dated as
of July 15, 2008
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE I
|
|
THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.1
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.3
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.4
|
|
Effects of the Merger
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.5
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.6
|
|
Directors and Officers of the Surviving Corporation
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.7
|
|
Tax Consequences
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.8
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE II
|
|
EFFECT OF THE MERGER ON THE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE CONSTITUENT
CORPORATIONS; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES AND PAYMENT
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 2.1
|
|
Effect on Capital Stock
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 2.2
|
|
Exchange of Certificates
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
Section 2.3
|
|
Certain Adjustments
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
Section 2.4
|
|
Dissenters Rights
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
Section 2.5
|
|
Further Assurances
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Section 2.6
|
|
Withholding Rights
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE III
|
|
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
Representations and Warranties of the Company
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Section 3.2
|
|
Representations and Warranties of Parent and Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV
|
|
COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
Conduct of Business
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section 4.2
|
|
No Solicitation by the Company
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE V
|
|
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
Section 5.1
|
|
Preparation of the
Form S-4
and the Joint Proxy Statement; Stockholders Meetings
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
Section 5.2
|
|
Access to Information; Confidentiality
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
Section 5.3
|
|
Reasonable Best Efforts; Cooperation
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
Section 5.4
|
|
Stock Options; Restricted Stock and Performance Shares
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
Section 5.5
|
|
Indemnification
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
Section 5.6
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
Section 5.7
|
|
NYSE Listing
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
Section 5.8
|
|
Stockholder Litigation
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
Section 5.9
|
|
Tax Treatment
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
Section 5.10
|
|
Standstill Agreements; Confidentiality Agreements
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
Section 5.11
|
|
Section 16(b)
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Section 5.12
|
|
Employee Benefit Matters
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Section 5.13
|
|
Actions with Respect to Existing Debt
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Section 5.14
|
|
Parent Board of Directors
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
Section 5.15
|
|
Dissenters Rights
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
Section 5.16
|
|
Company Credit Facility
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE VI
|
|
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
Section 6.1
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
Section 6.2
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
Section 6.3
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of the Company
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII
|
|
TERMINATION
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
Section 7.1
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
Section 7.2
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
Section 7.3
|
|
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
|
|
GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Section 8.1
|
|
Nonsurvival of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Section 8.2
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Section 8.3
|
|
Interpretation
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Section 8.4
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Section 8.5
|
|
Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Section 8.6
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Section 8.7
|
|
Assignment
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Section 8.8
|
|
Consent to Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Section 8.9
|
|
Specific Enforcement
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Section 8.10
|
|
Amendment
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Section 8.11
|
|
Extension; Waiver
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Section 8.12
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
A-ii
TABLE OF
DEFINED TERMS
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Page
|
|
1992 IEP
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
1996 Directors Plan
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
2005 LTIP
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
2007 Incentive Plan
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
ACM 2004 LTIP
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
Acquisition Agreement
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
Adjusted Option
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
affiliate
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Agreement
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Antitrust Law
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
Book-Entry Shares
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
Business Day
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Cash Consideration
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
Certificate of Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Closing Date
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Code
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Company
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Company Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
Company Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Company Certificate
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
Company Charter
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Company Common Stock
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Company Disclosure Letter
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Company Employees
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Company Entities
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
Company ERISA Affiliate
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Company Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Company Leased Real Property
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Company Leases
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Company Material Contract
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Company No Vote Termination Fee
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Company Owned Real Property
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Company Person
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
Company Representatives
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Company SEC Documents
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Company Stock Options
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
Company Stock Plans
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
Company Stockholder Approval
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Company Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
Company Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
Company Takeover Proposal
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Company Termination Fee
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
DGCL
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Directors DCP
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Dissenting Shares
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
A-iii
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Page
|
|
Dissenting Stockholder
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
employee
|
|
|
A-13, 25
|
|
Environment
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Environmental Claim
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Environmental Condition
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Environmental Laws
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Environmental Permit
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
ERISA
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Exchange Act
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
Form S-4
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Governmental Entity
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Hazardous Substance
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
HSR Act
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Indemnified Parties
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
Indenture
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Joint Proxy Statement
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
knowledge
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Law
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
material adverse change
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
material adverse effect
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Multiemployer Plan
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Multiple Employer Plan
|
|
|
A-12, 25
|
|
Noteholders
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Notes Consents
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Notes Offer to Purchase
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Notes Tender Offer
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Notes Tender Offer Documents
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Notice of Adverse Recommendation
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
Outside Date
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Parent Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
Parent Alternative Proposal
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Parent Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Parent Common Stock
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Parent Disclosure Letter
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Parent Entities
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Parent ERISA Affiliate
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Parent Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
A-iv
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Page
|
|
Parent Leased Real Property
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Parent Leases
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Parent LTIP
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Parent Material Contract
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Parent No Vote Termination Fee
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Parent Owned Real Property
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Parent Plan
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Parent SEC Documents
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Parent Stock Options
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Parent Stock Plans
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Parent Stockholder Approval
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Parent Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
Parent Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Parent Termination Fee
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
PCBs
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Performance Share
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
Permits
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Post-Closing Tax Period
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Pre-Closing Tax Period
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Prior Plan
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Recent Parent SEC Reports
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Recent SEC Reports
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Release
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Restricted Share
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
Retiree Plan
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
SEC
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Securities Act
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Series A-2
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Stock Consideration
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
subsidiary
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Successor Plan
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Supplemental Indenture
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
Surviving Corporation
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Takeover Statute
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Tax Certificates
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
Tax Return
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
TIA
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
Transferee
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
A-v
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this
Agreement), dated as of July 15,
2008, by and among Cleveland-Cliffs Inc, an Ohio corporation
(Parent), Daily Double Acquisition,
Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of
Parent (Merger Sub), and Alpha Natural
Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company).
W I T N E
S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the respective Boards of Directors of the Company and
Parent have each determined that a business combination between
Parent and the Company is in the best interests of their
respective companies and stockholders and, accordingly, have
agreed to effect the merger of the Merger Sub with and into the
Company (the Merger), upon the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement and in
accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the DGCL), whereby each
issued and outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01
per share, of the Company (Company Common
Stock), other than Dissenting Shares and any
shares of Company Common Stock owned by Parent or any direct or
indirect subsidiary of Parent or held in the treasury of the
Company, will be converted into the right to receive 0.95 (the
Exchange Ratio) of a share of common
stock, par value $0.125 per share, of Parent (Parent
Common Stock) and cash as provided in
Section 2.1;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined
that the Merger is advisable and fair to and in the best
interests of the Company and its stockholders;
WHEREAS, the Company, Parent and Merger Sub desire to make
certain representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in
connection with the Merger and also to prescribe various
conditions to the Merger; and
WHEREAS, for federal income tax purposes, it is intended that
the Merger will qualify as a reorganization under the provisions
of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), and any comparable
provisions of state or local law, and this Agreement is intended
to be and is adopted as a plan of reorganization for
purposes of Sections 354 and 361 of the Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements contained in this
Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and
upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE MERGER
Section 1.1 The
Merger. On the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth herein, and in accordance with the DGCL,
Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company at the
Effective Time, and the separate corporate existence of the
Merger Sub will thereupon cease. Following the Effective Time,
the Company will be the surviving corporation (the
Surviving Corporation).
Section 1.2 Closing. The
closing of the Merger (the Closing)
will take place at a time and on a date to be specified by the
parties hereto, which is to be no later than the second Business
Day after satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by applicable
Law) waiver by the party entitled to the benefit thereof of the
conditions (excluding conditions that, by their terms, cannot be
satisfied until the Closing Date, but subject to the fulfillment
or (to the extent permitted by applicable Law) waiver by the
party entitled to the benefit of those conditions) set forth in
Article VI, unless another time or date is agreed to
by the parties hereto. The Closing will be held at the offices
of Jones Day, 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, or
such other location to which the parties hereto agree in
writing. The date on which the Closing occurs is hereinafter
referred to as the Closing Date.
Business Day means any day other than
Saturday, Sunday or any day on which banking and savings and
loan institutions are authorized or required by Law to be closed.
Section 1.3 Effective
Time. On the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in this Agreement, (i) as soon as
practicable on the Closing Date, the parties shall file a
certificate of merger (the Certificate of
Merger) in
A-1
such form as is required by, and executed in accordance with,
the relevant provisions of the DGCL and the terms of this
Agreement and (ii) as soon as practicable on or after the
Closing Date, the parties shall make all other filings or
recordings required under the DGCL. The Merger will become
effective at such time as the Certificate of Merger is duly
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on
the Closing Date, or at such subsequent date or time as the
Company, Parent and Merger Sub agree and specify in the
Certificate of Merger (the date and time the Merger becomes
effective is hereinafter referred to as the
Effective Time).
Section 1.4 Effects
of the Merger. The Merger will have the
effects set forth in the DGCL. Without limiting the generality
of the foregoing, and subject thereto, at the Effective Time,
all the property, rights, privileges, powers and franchises of
the Company and Merger Sub will be vested in the Surviving
Corporation, and all debts, liabilities and duties of the
Company and Merger Sub will become the debts, liabilities and
duties of the Surviving Corporation.
Section 1.5 Certificate
of Incorporation and By-laws.
(a) Subject to Section 5.5, the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (the
Company Charter) shall be amended at
the Effective Time to be in the form of the certificate of
incorporation of Merger Sub, as in effect immediately before the
Effective Time, and, as so amended, such Company Charter shall
be the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving
Corporation until thereafter changed or amended as provided
therein or by applicable Law.
(b) Subject to Section 5.5, the by-laws of
Merger Sub, as in effect immediately before the Effective Time,
will be the by-laws of the Surviving Corporation, until
thereafter changed or amended as provided therein or by
applicable Law.
Section 1.6 Directors
and Officers of the Surviving
Corporation. The directors of Merger Sub
immediately prior to the Effective Time will be the directors of
the Surviving Corporation, until the earlier of their death,
resignation or removal or until their respective successors are
duly elected and qualified, as the case may be. The officers of
the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time will be the
officers of the Surviving Corporation, until the earlier of
their death, resignation or removal or until their respective
successors are duly elected and qualified, as the case may be.
Section 1.7 Tax
Consequences. It is intended by the parties
hereto that the Merger shall constitute a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and any comparable provisions
of applicable state or local Law. The parties hereto adopt this
Agreement as a plan of reorganization within the
meaning of Sections 354 and 361 of the Code and
Sections 1.368-2(g)
and 1.368-3(a) of the Treasury Regulations, and for all relevant
tax purposes.
Section 1.8 Restructuring. At
the election of Parent or the Company, if in their reasonable
good faith opinion, such action is necessary to cause the
conditions set forth in Section 6.2(d) or
Section 6.3(d) to be satisfied, Parent, Merger Sub
and the Company shall cooperate to (i) restructure the
Merger so that the Company shall be merged with and into Merger
Sub, with Merger Sub continuing as the Surviving Corporation
and/or
(ii) convert Merger Sub into a limited liability company
prior to the Effective Time; provided, that neither
Parent nor the Company shall be deemed to have breached any of
its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set
forth in this Agreement by reason of such election.
ARTICLE II
EFFECT OF
THE MERGER ON THE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE CONSTITUENT
CORPORATIONS;
EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES AND PAYMENT
Section 2.1 Effect
on Capital Stock. At the Effective Time, by
virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the
holder of any shares of capital stock of the Company, Parent or
Merger Sub:
(a) Merger Subs Common
Stock. Each share of Merger Subs common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time will be converted into and become
one fully paid and nonassessable share of common stock of the
Surviving Corporation.
A-2
(b) Cancellation of Treasury Stock and Parent Owned
Stock. Each share of Company Common Stock
that is owned by Parent or any direct or indirect subsidiary of
Parent or the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time
and any Company Common Stock held in the treasury of the Company
immediately prior to the Effective Time will automatically be
canceled and retired and will cease to exist, and no
consideration will be delivered in exchange therefor.
(c) Conversion of Company Common
Stock. Subject to Section 2.2(e),
each issued and outstanding share of Company Common Stock, other
than shares of Company Common Stock to be canceled in accordance
with Section 2.1(b) and Dissenting Shares, will be
converted into the right to receive (i) $22.23 in cash (the
Cash Consideration) without interest
and (ii) a number of validly issued, fully paid,
nonassessable shares of Parent Common Stock equal to the
Exchange Ratio (the Stock
Consideration). The Cash Consideration, the Stock
Consideration, and cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent
Common Stock as contemplated by Section 2.2(e) are
referred to collectively as the Merger
Consideration.
(d) Cancellation of Shares of Company Common
Stock. As of the Effective Time, all shares
of Company Common Stock, other than Dissenting Shares, shall no
longer be outstanding and will automatically be canceled and
retired and shall cease to exist, and each holder of a
certificate formerly representing any shares of Company Common
Stock (a Company Certificate) or book
entry shares (Book-Entry Shares) shall
cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except the right
to receive the Merger Consideration, certain dividends or other
distributions, if any, upon surrender of such Company
Certificate or Book-Entry Shares, in each case, in accordance
with this Article II, without interest.
Section 2.2 Exchange
of Certificates.
(a) Exchange Agent. Prior to the
Effective Time, Parent will designate a national bank or trust
company, that is reasonably satisfactory to the Company, to act
as agent of Parent for purposes of, among other things, mailing
and receiving transmittal letters and distributing the Merger
Consideration to the Company stockholders (the
Exchange Agent). Parent and the
Exchange Agent shall enter into an agreement which will provide
that Parent shall deposit with the Exchange Agent as of the
Effective Time, for the benefit of the holders of shares of
Company Common Stock, for exchange in accordance with this
Article II, through the Exchange Agent,
(i) immediately available funds sufficient to pay the
aggregate Cash Consideration and (ii) certificates
representing the shares of Parent Common Stock (such cash and
such shares of Parent Common Stock, together with any dividends
or distributions with respect thereto with a record date after
the Effective Time and any cash payable in lieu of any
fractional shares of Parent Common Stock, being hereinafter
referred to as the Exchange Fund)
issuable pursuant to Section 2.1 in exchange for
outstanding shares of Company Common Stock.
(b) Exchange Procedures.
(i) As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective
Time, and in any event within 5 Business Days thereafter, Parent
shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail to each holder of record
of a Company Certificate or Book-Entry Share whose shares of
Company Common Stock were converted into the right to receive
the Merger Consideration (A) a letter of transmittal (which
will specify that delivery will be effected, and risk of loss
and title to the Company Certificates will pass, only upon
proper delivery of the Company Certificates to the Exchange
Agent or, in the case of Book-Entry Shares, upon adherence to
the procedures set forth in the letter of transmittal, and such
letter of transmittal will be in customary form and have such
other provisions as Parent may reasonably specify consistent
with this Agreement) and (B) instructions for use in
effecting the surrender of the Company Certificates or, in the
case of Book-Entry Shares, the surrender of such Book-Entry
Shares in exchange for the Merger Consideration.
(ii) After the Effective Time, and upon surrender in
accordance with this Article II of a Company
Certificate or Book-Entry Shares for cancellation to the
Exchange Agent, together with such letter of transmittal, duly
executed, and such other documents as may reasonably be required
by the Exchange Agent, the holder of such Company Certificate or
Book-Entry Shares will be entitled to receive in exchange
therefor the Merger Consideration in the form of (A) a
certificate or book-entry share representing that number of
whole shares of Parent Common Stock that such holder has the
right to receive pursuant to the provisions of this Article
II, after taking into account all the shares of Company
Common Stock then held by such holder
A-3
under all such Book-Entry Shares or Company Certificates so
surrendered and (B) a check for the full amount of cash
that such holder has the right to receive pursuant to the
provisions of this Article II, including the Cash
Consideration, cash in lieu of fractional shares, certain
dividends or other distributions, if any, in accordance with
Section 2.2(c), and the Company Certificate or
Book-Entry Shares so surrendered will forthwith be canceled. In
the event of a transfer of ownership of shares of Company Common
Stock that is not registered in the transfer records of the
Company, payment may be issued to a person other than the person
in whose name the Company Certificate or Book-Entry Share so
surrendered is registered (the
Transferee) if such Company
Certificate or Book-Entry Share is properly endorsed or
otherwise in proper form for transfer and the Transferee pays
any transfer or other Taxes required by reason of such payment
to a person other than the registered holder of such Company
Certificate or Book-Entry Shares or establishes to the
satisfaction of the Exchange Agent that such Tax has been paid
or is not applicable. Until surrendered as contemplated by this
Section 2.2(b), each Company Certificate and each
Book-Entry Share will be deemed at any time after the Effective
Time to represent only the right to receive upon such surrender
the Merger Consideration that the holder thereof has the right
to receive in respect of such Company Certificate pursuant to
the provisions of this Article II and certain
dividends or other distributions, if any, in accordance with
Section 2.2(c). No interest will be paid or will
accrue on any Merger Consideration payable to holders of Company
Certificates or Book-Entry Shares pursuant to the provisions of
this Article II.
(c) Dividends; Other
Distributions. No dividends or other
distributions with respect to Parent Common Stock with a record
date after the Effective Time will be paid to the holder of any
unsurrendered Company Certificate or Book-Entry Shares with
respect to the shares of Parent Common Stock represented thereby
and no cash payment in lieu of fractional shares will be paid to
any such holder pursuant to Section 2.2(e), and all
such dividends, other distributions and cash in lieu of
fractional shares of Parent Common Stock will be paid by Parent
to the Exchange Agent and will be included in the Exchange Fund,
in each case until the surrender of such Company Certificate or
Book-Entry Share in accordance with this Article II.
Subject to the effect of applicable escheat or similar Laws,
following surrender of any such Company Certificate or
Book-Entry Share in accordance herewith, there will be paid to
the holder of the certificate representing whole shares of
Parent Common Stock issued in exchange therefor, without
interest, in addition to all other amounts to which such holder
is entitled under this Article II (i) at the
time of such surrender, the amount of dividends or other
distributions with a record date after the Effective Time
theretofore paid with respect to such whole shares of Parent
Common Stock and the amount of any cash payable in lieu of a
fractional share of Parent Common Stock to which such holder is
entitled pursuant to Section 2.2(e) and (ii) at
the appropriate payment date, the amount of dividends or other
distributions with a record date after the Effective Time but
prior to such surrender and with a payment date subsequent to
such surrender payable with respect to such whole shares of
Parent Common Stock.
(d) No Further Ownership Rights in Company Common
Stock. All shares of Parent Common Stock
issued and all Cash Consideration paid upon the surrender for
exchange of Company Certificates in accordance with the terms of
this Article II (including any cash paid pursuant to
Section 2.2(c) and Section 2.2(e)) will
be deemed to have been issued or paid, as the case may be, in
full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the shares of
Company Common Stock theretofore represented by such Company
Certificates and such Book-Entry Shares, and there will be no
further registration of transfers on the stock transfer books of
the Surviving Corporation of the shares of Company Common Stock
that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time.
If, after the Effective Time, Company Certificates or Book-Entry
Shares are presented to Parent, the Surviving Corporation or the
Exchange Agent for any reason, they will be canceled and
exchanged as provided in this Article II.
(e) No Fractional Shares.
(i) No certificates or scrip representing fractional shares
of Parent Common Stock will be issued upon the surrender for
exchange of Company Certificates or Book-Entry Shares, no
dividend or distribution of Parent will relate to such
fractional share interests and such fractional share interests
will not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any rights of a
stockholder of Parent.
(ii) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
each holder of shares of Company Common Stock converted pursuant
to the Merger who would otherwise be entitled to receive a
fraction of a share of Parent Common Stock (after taking into
account all shares of Company Common Stock held at the Effective
A-4
Time by such holder) shall receive, in lieu thereof, an amount
in cash (rounded up to the nearest whole cent and without
interest) equal to the product obtained by multiplying
(A) the fractional share interest to which such former
holder would otherwise be entitled (rounded up to the nearest
ten thousandth when expressed in decimal form) by (B) the
closing price for a share of Parent Common Stock as reported on
the NYSE Composite Transactions Reports (as reported in The
Wall Street Journal, or, if not reported thereby, any other
authoritative source) on the Closing Date or, if such date is
not a trading day, the trading day immediately preceding the
Closing Date (the Closing Price).
(iii) As soon as practicable after the determination of the
amount of cash, if any, to be paid to holders of Company
Certificates or Book-Entry Shares formerly representing shares
of Company Common Stock with respect to any fractional share
interests, the Exchange Agent shall make available such amounts
to such holders of Company Certificates or Book-Entry Shares
formerly representing shares of Company Common Stock subject to
and in accordance with the terms of Section 2.2(c).
(f) Termination of Exchange
Fund. Any portion of the Exchange Fund that
remains undistributed to the holders of the Company Certificates
or Book-Entry Shares for twelve months after the Effective Time
will be delivered to Parent, upon demand, and any holders of
Company Certificates or Book-Entry Shares who have not
theretofore complied with this Article II may
thereafter look only to Parent for payment of their claim for
Merger Consideration and any dividends or distributions, if any,
with respect to Parent Common Stock and any cash in lieu of
fractional shares of Parent Common Stock.
(g) No Liability. None of Parent,
the Surviving Corporation or the Exchange Agent will be liable
to any person in respect of any shares of Parent Common Stock,
any dividends or distributions with respect thereto, any cash in
lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock or any cash
from the Exchange Fund, in each case, delivered to a public
official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat
or similar Law.
(h) Investment of Exchange
Fund. The Exchange Agent shall invest any
cash included in the Exchange Fund as directed by Parent, on a
daily basis, provided, that, (i) no such
investment or losses thereon shall affect the amount of Merger
Consideration payable to the holders of shares of Company Common
Stock and (ii) such investments shall be in short-term
obligations of or guaranteed by the United States of America
with maturities of no more than 30 days, or in commercial
paper obligations rated
A-1 or
P-1 or
better by Moodys Investor Services, Inc. or
Standard & Poors Corporation, respectively. The
Exchange Fund shall not be used for any other purpose, except as
provided in this Agreement. Any interest and other income
resulting from such investments will be paid to Parent.
(i) Lost Certificates. If any
Company Certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the
making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming such
Company Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if
required by Parent or the Surviving Corporation, as the case may
be, the posting by such person of a bond in such reasonable
amount as Parent or the Surviving Corporation, as the case may
be, may direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made
against it with respect to such Company Certificate, the
Exchange Agent shall issue, in exchange for such lost, stolen or
destroyed Company Certificate, the Merger Consideration and, if
applicable, any unpaid dividends and distributions on shares of
Parent Common Stock deliverable in respect thereof and any cash
in lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock, in each
case, due to such person pursuant to this Agreement.
Section 2.3 Certain
Adjustments. If at any time during the period
between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, any
change in the outstanding shares of capital stock, or securities
convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for shares of
capital stock, of the Company or Parent shall occur as a result
of any merger, business combination, reclassification,
recapitalization, stock split (including a reverse stock split)
or subdivision or combination, exchange or readjustment of
shares, or any stock dividend or stock distribution with a
record date during such period, the Merger Consideration shall
be equitably adjusted, without duplication, to reflect such
change; provided that nothing in this
Section 2.3 shall be construed to permit either the
Company or Parent to take any action with respect to its
respective securities that is prohibited or not expressly
permitted by the terms of this Agreement.
Section 2.4 Dissenters
Rights. Shares of Company Common Stock that
have not been voted for adoption of this Agreement and with
respect to which appraisal has been properly demanded in
accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL
(Dissenting Shares) will not be
converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration at
or
A-5
after the Effective Time unless and until the holder of such
shares (a Dissenting Stockholder)
withdraws such demand for such appraisal (in accordance with
Section 262(k) of the DGCL) or becomes ineligible for such
appraisal. If a holder of Dissenting Shares withdraws such
demand for appraisal (in accordance with Section 262(k) of
the DGCL) or becomes ineligible for such appraisal, then, as of
the Effective Time or the occurrence of such event, whichever
last occurs, each of such holders Dissenting Shares will
cease to be a Dissenting Share and will be converted as of the
Effective Time into and represent the right to receive the
Merger Consideration, without interest thereon. The Company
shall give Parent prompt notice of any demands for appraisal,
attempted withdrawals of such demands and any other instruments
received by the Company relating to stockholders rights of
appraisal, and Parent shall have the right to participate in all
negotiations and proceedings with respect to such demands except
as required by applicable Law. The Company shall not, except
with prior written consent of Parent, make any payment with
respect to, or settle or offer to settle, any such demands,
unless and to the extent required to do so under applicable Law.
Section 2.5 Further
Assurances. At and after the Effective Time,
the officers and directors of the Surviving Corporation will be
authorized to execute and deliver, in the name and on behalf of
the Company or Merger Sub, any deeds, bills of sale, assignments
or assurances and to take and do, in the name and on behalf of
the Company or Merger Sub, any other actions and things to vest,
perfect or confirm of record or otherwise in the Surviving
Corporation any and all right, title and interest in, to and
under any of the rights, properties or assets acquired or to be
acquired by the Surviving Corporation as a result of, or in
connection with, the Merger.
Section 2.6 Withholding
Rights. The Surviving Corporation, Parent or
the Exchange Agent, as the case may be, shall be entitled to
deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable
pursuant to this Agreement to any person such amounts, if any,
as it is required to deduct and withhold with respect to the
making of such payment under the Code, or any provision of
state, local or foreign tax Law. To the extent that amounts are
so withheld and remitted to the appropriate taxing authority by
the Surviving Corporation, Parent or the Exchange Agent, as the
case may be, such amounts withheld shall be treated for all
purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to such person in
respect of which such deduction and withholding was made by the
Surviving Corporation, Parent or the Exchange Agent, as the case
may be. Parent shall pay, or shall cause to be paid, all amounts
so withheld to the appropriate taxing authority within the
period required under applicable Law.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES
Section 3.1 Representations
and Warranties of the Company. Subject only
to those exceptions and qualifications listed and described
(including an identification by section reference to the
representations and warranties to which such exceptions and
qualifications relate) on the disclosure letter delivered by the
Company to Parent prior to the execution of this Agreement (the
Company Disclosure Letter), provided,
however, that a matter disclosed in the Company Disclosure
Letter with respect to one representation or warranty shall also
be deemed to be disclosed with respect to each other
representation or warranty to the extent it is reasonably
apparent from the text of such disclosure that such disclosure
applies to or qualifies such other representation or warranty,
and except as set forth in the Recent SEC Reports, the Company
hereby represents and warrants to Parent and Merger Sub as
follows:
(a) Organization, Standing and Corporate
Power. The Company and each of the Company
Subsidiaries is a corporation or other legal entity duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing (with respect
to jurisdictions that recognize such concept) under the Laws of
the jurisdiction in which it is organized and has the requisite
corporate authority to carry on its business as now being
conducted. The Company and each of the Company Subsidiaries is
duly qualified or licensed to do business and is in good
standing (with respect to jurisdictions that recognize such
concept) in each jurisdiction in which the nature of its
business or the ownership, leasing or operation of its
properties makes such qualification or licensing necessary,
except for those jurisdictions where the failure to be so
qualified or licensed or to be in good standing, individually or
in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company
has made available to Parent prior to the execution of this
Agreement complete and correct copies of the Company Charter and
the bylaws of the Company, each as amended to date.
A-6
(b) Subsidiaries. All outstanding
shares of capital stock of, or other equity interests in, each
subsidiary of the Company (collectively, the Company
Subsidiaries and, together with the Company, the
Company Entities) (i) have been
validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable,
(ii) are free and clear of all Liens other than Permitted
Liens and (iii) are free of any other restriction
(including any restriction on the right to vote, sell or
otherwise dispose of such capital stock or other ownership
interests). All outstanding shares of capital stock (or
equivalent equity interests of entities other than corporations)
of each of the Company Subsidiaries are beneficially owned,
directly or indirectly, by the Company. The Company does not,
directly or indirectly, own more than 20% but less than 100% of
the capital stock or other equity interest in any person other
than the Company Subsidiaries.
(c) Capital Structure. The
authorized capital stock of the Company consists entirely of
(i) 100,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock, and
(ii) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.01 per share. At the close of business on July 14, 2008:
(i) 70,494,861 shares of Company Common Stock were
issued and outstanding (including 962,214 shares of
unvested restricted stock); (ii) no shares of Company
Common Stock were held by the Company in its treasury;
(iii) 6,086,130 shares of Company Common Stock were
issuable under the Alpha Coal Management LLC Amended and
Restated 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the ACM 2004
LTIP) and the Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. 2005
Long-Term Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of
May 14, 2008 (the 2005 LTIP and,
together with the ACM 2004 LTIP, the Company Stock
Plans and such stock options collectively, the
Company Stock Options); and
(iv) up to 977,320 shares of the Company Common Stock
were subject to issued and outstanding performance share grants
under the Company Stock Plans. The Company has made available to
Parent a list, as of the close of business on July 11,
2008, of the holders of outstanding Company Stock Options,
restricted shares, and performance shares or units, and the
number of shares outstanding, the number of shares exercisable
(with respect to the Company Stock Options), the vesting
schedule and other forfeiture provision (with respect to
restricted shares and performance shares or units) and the
exercise price, as applicable, subject to each such equity
award. As of the close of business on July 14, 2008, the
total number of votes entitled to be cast at the Company
Stockholders Meeting with respect to the transactions
contemplated hereby is 70,494,861. All outstanding shares of
capital stock of the Company are, and all shares that may be
issued will be, when issued, duly authorized, validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable and not subject to or issued in
violation of preemptive rights. Except as otherwise provided in
this Section 3.1(c), there are not issued, reserved
for issuance or outstanding (i) any shares of capital stock
or other voting securities of the Company, (ii) any
securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
shares of capital stock or voting securities of the Company or
any Company Subsidiary, or (iii) any warrants, calls,
options or other rights to acquire from the Company or any
Company Subsidiary any capital stock, voting securities or
securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
capital stock or voting securities of the Company or any Company
Subsidiary. Except as otherwise provided in this
Section 3.1(c), there are no outstanding obligations
of the Company or any Company Subsidiary to (i) issue,
deliver or sell, or cause to be issued, delivered or sold, any
capital stock, voting securities or securities convertible into
or exchangeable or exercisable for capital stock or voting
securities of the Company or any Company Subsidiary or
(ii) repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any such
securities. Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary is a
party to any voting agreement with respect to the voting of any
such securities. Except as otherwise provided in this
Section 3.1(c), there are no agreements,
arrangements or commitments of any character (contingent or
otherwise) pursuant to which any person is or may be entitled to
receive from the Company or a Company Subsidiary any payment
based on the revenues, earnings or financial performance of the
Company or any Company Subsidiary or assets or calculated in
accordance therewith.
(d) Authority;
Noncontravention. The Company has all
requisite corporate power and authority to enter into this
Agreement and, subject to the Company Stockholder Approval, to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The
execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company and the
consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated
hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate
action on the part of the Company, subject, in the case of the
Merger, to the Company Stockholder Approval. This Agreement has
been duly executed and delivered by the Company and, assuming
the due authorization, execution and delivery by Parent and
Merger Sub, constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation
of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance
with its terms, except as the
A-7
enforcement thereof may be limited by applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar Laws generally
affecting the rights of creditors and subject to general equity
principles. The execution and delivery of this Agreement does
not, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement and compliance with the provisions of this
Agreement will not, (i) conflict with the certificate of
incorporation or by-laws (or comparable organizational
documents) of any of the Company Entities, (ii) assuming
that all the consents, approvals and filings referred to in the
next sentence are duly obtained
and/or made,
(A) result in any breach, violation or default (with or
without notice or lapse of time, or both) under, or give rise to
a right of termination, cancellation or creation or acceleration
of any obligation or right of a third party or loss of a benefit
under, or result in the creation of any Lien upon any of the
properties or assets of any of the Company Entities under, any
loan or credit agreement, note, bond, mortgage, indenture, lease
or other agreement, instrument, permit, concession, franchise,
license or other authorization applicable to any of the Company
Entities or their respective properties or assets are bound or
(B) conflict with or violate any judgment, order, decree or
Law applicable to any of the Company Entities or their
respective properties or assets, other than, in the case of
clause (ii)(A) and (B) and (iii) any such conflicts,
breaches, violations, defaults, rights, losses or Liens that,
individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on the
Company. No consent, approval, order or authorization of, action
by or in respect of, or registration, declaration or filing
with, any federal, state or local or foreign government, any
court, administrative, regulatory or other governmental agency,
commission or authority or any non-governmental United States or
foreign self-regulatory agency, commission or authority or any
arbitral tribunal (each, a Governmental
Entity) or any third party is required by the
Company in connection with the execution and delivery of this
Agreement by the Company or the consummation by the Company of
the transactions contemplated hereby, except for: (i) the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) of (A) a proxy
statement/prospectus relating to the Company Stockholders
Meeting (such proxy statement/prospectus, together with the
proxy statement relating to the Parent Stockholders Meeting, as
amended or supplemented from time to time, the Joint
Proxy Statement) and (B) such reports under
Section 13(a), 13(d), 15(d) or 16(a) or such other
applicable sections of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), as may be
required in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby; (ii) the filing of the Certificate of
Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware;
(iii) the filing of a premerger notification and report
form by the Company under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the
HSR Act); (iv) notifications to
the NYSE; (v) such governmental consents, qualifications or
filings as are customarily obtained or made in connection with
the transfer of interests or the change of control of ownership
in properties used for the mining, processing or shipping of
coal or iron ore, including notices and consents relating to or
in connection with mining, reclamation and environmental
Permits, in each case under the applicable Laws of Alabama,
Michigan, Kentucky, Virginia, Minnesota, West Virginia,
Pennsylvania, United States, Australia, and Canada, and
(vi) such consents, approvals, orders or authorizations the
failure of which to be made or obtained, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or result in
a material adverse effect on the Company.
(e) SEC Reports and Financial Statements; Undisclosed
Liabilities; Internal Controls.
(i) The Company has timely filed all required reports,
schedules, forms, statements and other documents (including
exhibits and all other information incorporated therein) under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act) and the Exchange Act
with the SEC since December 31, 2006 (as such reports,
schedules, forms, statements and documents have been amended
since the time of their filing, collectively, the
Company SEC Documents). As of their
respective dates, or if amended prior to the date of this
Agreement, as of the date of the last such amendment, the
Company SEC Documents complied in all material respects with the
requirements of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the
case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
promulgated thereunder applicable to such Company SEC Documents,
and none of the Company SEC Documents when filed, or as so
amended, contained any untrue statement of a material fact or
omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
As of the date of this Agreement, there are no outstanding or
unresolved comments in comment letters received from the SEC
staff.
A-8
(ii) The financial statements of the Company included in
the Company SEC Documents, comply as to form, as of their
respective date of filing with the SEC, in all material respects
with applicable accounting requirements and the published rules
and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto, have been
prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) (except,
in the case of unaudited statements, as permitted by
Form 10-Q
of the SEC) applied on a consistent basis during the periods
involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto), and
on that basis fairly present in all material respects the
consolidated financial position of the Company and its
Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and the consolidated
statements of income, cash flows and stockholders equity
for the periods then ended (subject, in the case of unaudited
statements, to normal recurring year-end audit adjustments). No
Company Subsidiary is required to make any filings with the SEC.
Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Documents filed since
December 31, 2007 and prior to the date of this Agreement
(the Recent SEC Reports), since
December 31, 2007, the Company and the Company Subsidiaries
have not incurred any liabilities (direct, contingent or
otherwise), that are of a nature that would be required to be
disclosed on a balance sheet of the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries or the footnotes thereto prepared in conformity
with GAAP, other than (A) liabilities incurred in the
ordinary course of business and (B) liabilities that,
individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on the
Company.
(iii) The records, systems, controls, data and information
of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries are recorded,
stored, maintained and operated under means (including any
electronic, mechanical or photographic process, whether
computerized or not) that are under the exclusive ownership and
direct control of the Company or the Company Subsidiaries or
their accountants (including all means of access thereto and
therefrom) except for any non-exclusive ownership and non-direct
control that would not reasonably be expected to have or result
in a material adverse effect on the system of internal
accounting controls described in the following sentence. As and
to the extent described in the Company SEC Documents, the
Company and the Company Subsidiaries have devised and maintain a
system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide
reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements in
accordance with GAAP. The Company (A) has implemented and
maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as required by
Rule 13a-15(a)
of the Exchange Act) designed to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to the management of the Company by
others within those entities, and (B) has disclosed, based
on its most recent evaluation prior to the date hereof, to the
Companys auditors and the audit committee of the
Companys Board of Directors (1) any significant
deficiencies or material weakness in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect in any material respect the Companys ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and
(2) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Companys internal controls. The Company has made available
to Parent a summary of any such disclosure made by Company
management to the Companys auditors or audit committee of
the Companys Board of Directors since December 31,
2007.
(f) Information Supplied. None of
the information supplied or to be supplied by the Company
specifically for inclusion or incorporation by reference in
(i) the registration statement on
Form S-4
to be filed with the SEC by Parent in connection with the
issuance of Parent Common Stock in the Merger (the
Form S-4)
will, at the time the
Form S-4
becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they are made, not misleading, or (ii) the Joint Proxy
Statement will, at the date it is first mailed to the
Companys stockholders and Parents stockholders or at
the time of the Company Stockholders Meeting or the Parent
Stockholders Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they are made, not
misleading. The Joint Proxy Statement will comply as to form in
all material respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder, except that no
representation or warranty is made by the Company with respect
to statements made or incorporated by reference therein based on
information supplied
A-9
by Parent or Merger Sub specifically for inclusion or
incorporation by reference in the
Form S-4
or the Joint Proxy Statement.
(g) Absence of Certain Changes or
Events. Except for liabilities incurred in
connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated
hereby, since December 31, 2007, (i) each of the
Company Entities has conducted its respective operations only in
the ordinary course consistent with past practice,
(ii) there has not been any event, circumstance, change,
occurrence or state of facts that, individually or in the
aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Company and (iii) none of
the Company Entities has taken any action that if taken after
the date of this Agreement would constitute a violation of
Section 4.1(a) (other than
Sections 4.1(a)(i),(ii) and (iii)(A)).
(h) Compliance with Applicable Laws;
Litigation.
(i) The operations of the Company Entities have not been
since January 1, 2006 and are not being conducted in
violation of any Law (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001) or any Permit necessary
for the conduct of their respective businesses as currently
conducted, except where such violations, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or result in
a material adverse effect on the Company. None of the Company
Entities has received any written notice, or has knowledge of
any claim, alleging any such violation.
(ii) The Company Entities hold all licenses, permits,
variances, consents, authorizations, waivers, grants,
franchises, concessions, exemptions, orders, registrations and
approvals of Governmental Entities or other persons
(Permits) necessary for the conduct of
their respective businesses as currently conducted, except where
the failure to hold such Permits, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or result in
a material adverse effect on the Company. None of the Company
Entities has received written notice that any such Permit will
be terminated or modified or cannot be renewed in the ordinary
course of business, and the Company has no knowledge of any
reasonable basis for any such termination, modification or
nonrenewal, except for such terminations, modifications or
nonrenewals as, individually or in the aggregate, would not
reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse
effect on the Company. The execution, delivery and performance
of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby do not and will not violate any such Permit,
or result in any termination, modification or nonrenewals
thereof, except for such violations, terminations, modifications
or nonrenewals thereof as, individually or in the aggregate,
would not reasonably be expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on the Company.
(iii) There is no suit, action or proceeding by or before
any Governmental Entity pending (or, to the knowledge of the
Company, threatened), except for any such suit, action or
proceeding that challenges or seeks to prohibit the execution,
delivery or performance of this Agreement or any of the
transactions contemplated hereby, to which the Company or any
Company Subsidiary is a party or against the Company or any
Company Subsidiary or any of their properties or assets that
would reasonably be expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on the Company. As of the date hereof, there is
no suit, action or proceeding by or before any Governmental
Entity pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened,
against the Company or any Company Subsidiary challenging or
seeking to prohibit the execution, delivery or performance this
Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated hereby.
(i) Employee Benefit Plans.
(i) The Company has made available to Parent a true and
complete list of (A) each material bonus, pension, profit
sharing, deferred compensation, incentive compensation, stock
ownership, stock purchase, stock option, equity compensation,
retirement, vacation, employment, disability, death benefit,
hospitalization, medical insurance, life insurance, welfare,
severance or other employee benefit plan, agreement, arrangement
or understanding maintained by the Company or any Company
Subsidiary or to which the Company or any Company Subsidiary
contributes or is obligated to contribute with respect to its
employees, and (B) each change of control agreement
providing benefits to any current or former employee, officer or
director of the Company or any Company Subsidiary, to which the
Company or any
A-10
Company Subsidiary is a party or by which the Company or any
Company Subsidiary is bound (collectively, the
Company Benefit Plans). With respect
to each Company Benefit Plan, no event has occurred and there
exists no condition or set of circumstances in connection with
which the Company or any Company Subsidiary could be subject to
any liability that, individually or in the aggregate, would
reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse
effect on the Company. Neither the Company nor any Company
Subsidiary has any liability (including contingent liability)
with respect to any plan, agreement, arrangement or
understanding of the type described in this paragraph other than
the Company Benefit Plans, other than liability that,
individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on the
Company.
(ii) Each Company Benefit Plan has been administered in
accordance with its terms, all applicable Laws, including the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA), and the Code, and the terms
of all applicable collective bargaining agreements, except for
any failures so to administer any Company Benefit Plan that,
individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on the
Company. The Company and all Company Benefit Plans are in
compliance with the applicable provisions of ERISA, the Code and
all other applicable Laws and the terms of all applicable
collective bargaining agreements, except for any failures to be
in such compliance that, individually or in the aggregate, would
not reasonably be expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on the Company. Each Company Benefit Plan that is
intended to be qualified under Section 401(a), 401(k) or
4975(e)(7) of the Code has received a favorable determination
letter from the IRS as to its qualified status and, to the
knowledge of the Company, there exist no facts or circumstances
that have caused or could cause a failure to be so qualified
under Section 401(a), 401(k) or 4975(e)(7) of the Code. No
fact or event has occurred which is reasonably likely to affect
adversely the qualified status of any such Company Benefit Plan
or the exempt status of any such trust, except for any
occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate, would not
reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse
effect on the Company. All contributions to, and payments from,
the Company Benefit Plans that are required to have been made in
accordance with such Company Benefit Plans, ERISA or the Code
have been timely made other than any failures that, individually
or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on the Company. All trusts
providing funding for Company Benefit Plans that are intended to
comply with Section 501(c)(9) of the Code are exempt from
federal income taxation and, together with any other welfare
benefit funds (as defined in Section 419(e)(1) of the Code)
maintained in connection with any of the Company Benefit Plans,
have been operated and administered in compliance with all
applicable requirements such that neither the Company, any
Company Subsidiary, any Company Benefit Plan nor such trust or
fund is subject to any taxes, penalties or other liabilities
imposed as a consequence of failure to comply with such
requirements, other than any liability that, individually or in
the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on the Company. No welfare
benefit fund (as defined in Section 419(e)(1) of the Code)
maintained in connection with any of the Company Benefit Plans
has provided any disqualified benefit (as defined in
Section 4976(b)(1) of the Code) for which the Company or
any Company Subsidiary has or had any liability for the excise
tax imposed by Section 4976 of the Code which has not been
paid in full, other than any liability that, individually or in
the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on the Company.
(iii) Other than as would not reasonably be expected to
have or result in a material adverse effect on the Company,
neither the Company nor any trade or business, whether or not
incorporated, which, together with the Company, would be deemed
to be a single employer within the meaning of
Section 4001(b) of ERISA or Section 414(b) or 414(c)
of the Code (a Company ERISA
Affiliate) has incurred any liability under
Title IV of ERISA (other than for premiums pursuant to
Section 4007 of ERISA which have been timely paid) or
Section 4971 of the Code, and no condition exists that
presents a risk to the Company or any Company ERISA Affiliate of
incurring any such liability or failure. None of the Company
Benefit Plans (other than Multiemployer Plans) are defined
benefit plans within the meaning of ERISA or subject to the
minimum funding requirements of Section 412 of the Code or
Section 302 of ERISA.
A-11
(iv) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on the Company, no Company
Benefit Plan provides medical or life insurance benefits
(whether or not insured) with respect to current or former
employees or officers or directors after retirement or other
termination of service, other than any such coverage required by
Law, and the Company and the Company Subsidiaries have reserved
all rights necessary to amend or terminate each of the Company
Benefit Plans without the consent of any other person.
(v) The consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement will not, either alone or in combination with
another event, (A) entitle any current or former employee,
officer or director of the Company or the Company Subsidiaries
to severance pay, unemployment compensation or any other
payment, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, or
(B) accelerate the time of payment or vesting, or increase
the amount of compensation due any such employee, officer or
director.
(vi) Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary is a
party to any agreement, contract or arrangement (including this
Agreement) that could result, separately or in the aggregate, in
the payment of any excess parachute payments within
the meaning of Section 280G of the Code. No Company Benefit
Plan provides for the reimbursement of excise taxes under
Section 4999 of the Code or any income taxes under the Code.
(vii) With respect to each Company Benefit Plan, the
Company has delivered or made available to Parent a true and
complete copy of: (A) each writing constituting a part of
such Company Benefit Plan, including all Company Benefit Plan
documents and trust agreements; (B) the most recent Annual
Reports (Form 5500 Series) and accompanying schedules, if
any; (C) the most recent annual financial report, if any;
(D) the most recent actuarial report, if any; and
(E) the most recent determination letter from the Internal
Revenue Service, if any. Except as specifically provided in the
foregoing documents delivered or made available to Parent or in
Section 3.1(i)(v) of the Company Disclosure Letter, there
are no material amendments to any Company Benefit Plan that have
been adopted or approved nor has the Company or any Company
Subsidiary undertaken to make any such material amendments or to
adopt or approve any new Company Benefit Plan.
(viii) No Company Benefit Plan is a multiemployer plan (as
defined in Section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA) (a
Multiemployer Plan) or a plan that has
two or more contributing sponsors at least two of whom are not
under common control, within the meaning of Section 4063 of
ERISA (a Multiple Employer Plan).
Other than as would not reasonably be expected to have or result
in a material adverse effect on the Company, none of the
Company, the Company Subsidiaries nor any of their respective
Company ERISA Affiliates has, at any time during the last six
years, contributed to or been obligated to contribute to any
Multiemployer Plan or Multiple Employer Plan. None of the
Company, the Company Subsidiaries nor any of their respective
Company ERISA Affiliates has incurred any material withdrawal
liability under a Multiemployer Plan that has not been satisfied
in full, nor does the Company have any material contingent
liability with respect to any withdrawal from any Multiemployer
Plan. None of the Company, the Company Subsidiaries nor any of
their respective Company ERISA Affiliates would incur any
material withdrawal liability (within the meaning of Part 1
of Subtitle E of Title I of ERISA) if the Company, the
Company Subsidiaries or any of their respective Company ERISA
Affiliates withdrew (within the meaning of Part 1 of
Subtitle E of Title I of ERISA) on or prior to the Closing
Date from each Multiemployer Plan to which the Company, the
Company Subsidiaries or any of their respective Company ERISA
Affiliates has an obligation to contribute on the date of this
Agreement. To the knowledge of the Company, no Multiemployer
Plan to which the Company, the Company Subsidiaries or any of
their respective Company ERISA Affiliates contributes or
otherwise has any liability (contingent or otherwise) has
incurred an accumulated funding deficiency within the meaning of
Section 431(a) of the Code or Section 304(a) of ERISA,
is insolvent, is in reorganization (within the meaning of
Section 4241 of ERISA), is reasonably likely to commence
reorganization, is in endangered or
critical status (as such terms are defined in
Section 432 of the Code) or is reasonably likely to be in
endangered or critical status.
A-12
(ix) There are no pending or threatened claims (other than
claims for benefits in the ordinary course), lawsuits or
arbitrations that have been asserted or instituted, or to the
Companys knowledge, no set of circumstances exists that
may reasonably give rise to a claim or lawsuit, against the
Company Benefit Plans, any fiduciaries thereof with respect to
their duties to the Company Benefit Plans or the assets of any
of the trusts under any of the Company Benefit Plans that could
reasonably be expected to result in any material liability of
the Company or any Company Subsidiaries to the PBGC, the
United States Department of Treasury, the United States
Department of Labor, any Multiemployer Plan, any Company Benefit
Plan, any participant in a Company Benefit Plan, any employee
benefit plan with respect to which the Company or any Company
Subsidiary has any contingent liability, or any participant in
an employee benefit plan with respect to which the Company or
any Company Subsidiary has any contingent liability other than
any liability that, individually or in the aggregate, would not
reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse
effect on the Company.
(x) To the knowledge of the Company, there have been no
prohibited transactions or breaches of any of the duties imposed
on fiduciaries (within the meaning of
Section 3(21) of ERISA) by ERISA with respect to the
Company Benefit Plans that could result in any liability or
excise tax under ERISA or the Code being imposed on the Company
or any of the Company Subsidiaries, other than any liability
that, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on the
Company.
(xi) All contributions, transfers and payments in respect
of any Company Benefit Plan, other than transfers incident to an
incentive stock option plan within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Code, have been or are fully deductible
under the Code, except as would not reasonably be expected to
have or result in a material adverse effect on the Company.
(xii) With respect to any insurance policy that has, or
does, provide funding for benefits under any Company Benefit
Plan, to the knowledge of the Company no insurance company
issuing any such policy is in receivership, conservatorship,
liquidation or similar proceeding and, to the knowledge of the
Company, no such proceedings with respect to any insurer are
imminent.
(xiii) For purposes of this Section 3.1(i)
only, the term employee will be
considered to include individuals rendering personal services to
the Company or any Company Subsidiary as independent contractors.
(j) Taxes. (i) Except as
would not have or reasonably be expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the Company,
the Company and each Company Subsidiary has timely filed all Tax
Returns required to be filed, and all such returns are true,
correct, and complete; (ii) the Company and each Company
Subsidiary has paid all Taxes due whether or not shown on any
Tax Return, except, in the cases of (i) and
(ii) hereof, with respect to Taxes that are being contested
in good faith by appropriate proceedings; (iii) there are
no pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened,
audits, examinations, investigations or other proceedings in
respect of Taxes relating to the Company or any Company
Subsidiary; (iv) there are no Liens for Taxes upon the
assets of the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries, other
than Liens for Taxes not yet due and Liens for Taxes that are
being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings;
(v) neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries
has any liability for Taxes of any person (other than the
Company and the Company Subsidiaries) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
(or any comparable provision of Law), as a transferee or
successor, by contract, or otherwise; (vi) neither the
Company nor any Company Subsidiary is a party to any agreement
or arrangement relating to the allocation, sharing or
indemnification of Taxes; (vii) neither the Company nor any
Company Subsidiary has taken any action or knows of any fact,
agreement, plan or other circumstance that is reasonably likely
to prevent the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code; (viii) no
deficiencies for any Taxes have been proposed, asserted or
assessed against the Company or any Company Subsidiary for which
adequate reserves in accordance with GAAP have not been created;
(ix) neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary will be
required to include any adjustment in taxable income for any Tax
period ending after the Closing Date (a Post-Closing
Tax Period) under Section 481(c) of the Code
(or any comparable provision of Law) as a result of a change in
method of accounting for any Tax period (or
A-13
portion thereof) ending prior to the Closing Date (a
Pre-Closing Tax Period) or pursuant to
the provisions of any agreement entered into with any taxing
authority with regard to the Tax liability of the Company or any
Company Subsidiary for any Pre-Closing Tax Period; (x) the
financial statements included in the Company SEC Documents
reflect an adequate reserve in accordance with GAAP for all
Taxes for which the Company or any Company Subsidiary may be
liable for all taxable periods and portions thereof through the
date hereof; (xi) no person has granted any extension or
waiver of the statute of limitations period applicable to any
Tax of the Company or any Company Subsidiary or any affiliated,
combined or unitary group of which the Company or any Company
Subsidiary is or was a member, which period (after giving effect
to such extension or waiver) has not yet expired, and there is
no currently effective closing agreement pursuant to
Section 7121 of the Code (or any similar provision of
foreign, state or local Law); (xii) the Company and each
Company Subsidiary have withheld and remitted to the appropriate
taxing authority all Taxes required to have been withheld and
remitted in connection with any amounts paid or owing to any
employee, independent contractor, creditor, stockholder, or
other third party, and have complied in all material respects
with all applicable Laws relating to information reporting;
(xiii) neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has
distributed the stock of another person or has had its stock
distributed by another person, in a transaction that was
purported or intended to be governed in whole or in part by
Section 355 or Section 361 of the C ode;
(xiv) neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has
participated in any transaction that has been identified by the
Internal Revenue Service in any published guidance as a
listed transaction (as defined in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4);
and (xv) the consolidated federal income Tax Returns of the
Company have been examined, or the statute of limitations has
closed, with respect to all taxable years through and including
2003. As used in this Agreement, Taxes
includes all federal, state or local or foreign net and
gross income, alternative or add-on minimum, environmental,
gross receipts, ad valorem, value added, goods and
services, capital stock, profits, license, single business,
employment, severance, stamp, unemployment insurance, social
security, employment, customs, real property, personal property,
sales, excise, resource, use, occupation, service, transfer,
payroll, franchise, withholding and other taxes or similar
governmental duties, charges, fees, levies or other assessments,
including any interest, penalties, fines or additions with
respect thereto, and any interest, in respect of any penalties,
fines or additions attributable or imposed or with respect to
any such taxes, charges, fees, levies or other assessments. As
used herein, Tax Return shall mean any
return, report, statement or information required to be filed
with any Governmental Entity with respect to Taxes, including
any supplement thereto or amendment thereof.
(k) Environmental Matters.
(i) Except where noncompliance, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or result in
a material adverse effect on the Company, the Company Entities
are and have been for the past three years in compliance with
all applicable Environmental, Health and Safety Laws and
Environmental Permits.
(ii) There are no written Environmental, Health and Safety
Claims pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened,
against the Company or any Company Subsidiary and, to the
knowledge of the Company, there are no existing conditions,
circumstances or facts which could give rise to an
Environmental, Health and Safety Claim, other than
Environmental, Health and Safety Claims or conditions,
circumstances or facts as would not reasonably be expected to
have or result in a material adverse effect on the Company.
(iii) The Company has made available to Parent all material
information, including such studies, reports, correspondence,
notices of violation, requests for information, audits, analyses
and test results and any other documents, in the possession,
custody or control of the Company Entities relating to
(A) the Company Entities compliance or noncompliance
within the previous two years with Environmental, Health and
Safety Laws and Environmental Permits, and
(B) Environmental Conditions on, under or about any of the
properties or assets owned, leased, operated or otherwise used
by any of the Company Entities at the present time or for which
any of the Company Entities may be responsible or liable.
(iv) No Hazardous Substance has been generated, treated,
stored, disposed of, used, handled or manufactured at, or
transported, shipped or disposed of from, currently or
previously owned, leased,
A-14
operated or otherwise used properties in violation of applicable
Environmental, Health and Safety Laws or Environmental Permits
that, individually or in the aggregate, would reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on the
Company, and there have been no Releases of any Hazardous
Substance in, on, under, from or affecting any currently or
previously owned, leased, operated or otherwise used properties
that, individually or in the aggregate, would reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on the
Company.
(v) None of the Company or the Company Subsidiaries has
received from any Governmental Entity or other third party any
written (or, to the knowledge of the Company, other) notice that
any of them or any of their predecessors is or may be a
potentially responsible party in respect of, or may otherwise
bear liability for, any actual or threatened Release of any
Hazardous Substance at any site or facility that is, has been or
could reasonably be expected to be listed on the National
Priorities List, the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Information System, the National
Corrective Action Priority System or any similar or analogous
federal, state, provincial, territorial, municipal, county,
local or other domestic or foreign list, schedule, inventory or
database of Hazardous Substance sites or facilities.
(vi) Neither this Agreement nor the transactions
contemplated hereby will result in any requirement for
environmental disclosure, investigation, cleanup, removal or
remedial action, or notification to or consent of any
Governmental Entity or third party, with respect to any property
owned, leased, operated or otherwise used by the Company or any
Company Subsidiary, pursuant to any Environmental, Health and
Safety Law, including any so-called property transfer
law.
(vii) None of the Company or the Company Subsidiaries has
assumed, undertaken or otherwise become subject to any liability
of any other person relating to or arising from Environmental,
Health and Safety Laws, except as would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on the
Company.
(viii) There exist no Environmental Conditions relating to
any currently or previously owned, leased, operated or otherwise
used properties which, individually or in the aggregate, would
reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse
effect on the Company.
(ix) As used in this Agreement:
(u) the term Environment means
soil, surface waters, ground water, land, stream sediment,
surface and subsurface strata, ambient air, indoor air or indoor
air quality, including any material or substance used in the
physical structure of any building or improvement;
(v) the term Environmental, Health and Safety
Claim means any written or other claim, demand,
suit, action, proceeding, order, investigation or notice to any
of the Company Entities or the Parent Entities, as applicable,
by any person alleging any potential liability (including
potential liability for investigatory costs, risk assessment
costs, cleanup costs, removal costs, remedial costs, operation
and maintenance costs, governmental response costs, natural
resource damages, or penalties) arising out of, based on, or
resulting from (1) alleged noncompliance with any
Environmental, Health and Safety Law or Environmental Permit,
(2) alleged injury or damage arising from exposure to
Hazardous Substances, or (3) the presence, Release or
threatened Release into the Environment, of any Hazardous
Substance at or from any location, whether or not owned, leased,
operated or otherwise used by the Company or any Company
Subsidiary, or Parent or any Parent Subsidiary, as applicable;
(w) the term Environmental, Health and Safety
Laws means all Laws relating to (1) pollution
or protection of the Environment, (2) emissions,
discharges, Releases or threatened Releases of Hazardous
Substances, (3) threats to human health or ecological
resources arising from exposure to Hazardous Substances,
(4) the manufacture, generation, processing, distribution,
use, sale, treatment, receipt, storage, disposal, transport or
handling of Hazardous Substances, (5) mining and
reclamation, or (6) employee health and safety, and
includes the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act, the Resource Conversation and Recovery Act,
the Clean
A-15
Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Water Pollution Control Act,
the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the
Mine Safety and Health Act, the Mine Improvement and New
Emergency Response Act, and any similar foreign, state or local
Laws;
(x) the term Hazardous Substance
means (1) chemicals, pollutants, contaminants,
hazardous wastes, toxic substances, toxic mold, radiation and
radioactive materials, (2) any substance that is or
contains asbestos, urea formaldehyde foam insulation,
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
petroleum or petroleum-derived substances or wastes, leaded
paints, radon gas or related materials, (3) any substance
that requires removal or remediation under any applicable
Environmental Law, or is defined, listed or identified as a
hazardous waste or hazardous substance
thereunder, or (4) any substance that is regulated under
any applicable Environmental Law;
(y) the term Release means any
releasing, disposing, discharging, injecting, spilling, leaking,
pumping, dumping, emitting, escaping, emptying, migration,
placing and the like, or otherwise entering into the Environment
(including the abandonment or discarding of barrels, containers,
and other closed receptacles containing any Hazardous Substances
and any condition that results in exposure of a person to a
Hazardous Substance);
(z) the term Law means any
foreign, federal, state or local law, statute, code, ordinance,
regulation, rule, principle of common law or other legally
enforceable obligation imposed by a court or other Governmental
Entity;
(aa) the term Environmental Permit
means all Permits and the timely submission of
applications for Permits, as required under applicable
Environmental Laws; and
(bb) the term Environmental Condition
means any contamination, damage, injury or other
condition related to Hazardous Substances or workplace safety
and includes any present or former Hazardous Substance
treatment, storage, disposal or recycling units, underground
storage tanks, wastewater treatment or management systems,
wetlands, sumps, lagoons, impoundments, landfills, ponds,
incinerators, wells, asbestos-containing materials, or
PCB-containing articles.
(l) Real Property; Assets.
(i) The Company or a Company Subsidiary has good and
marketable title to each parcel of or interest in real property
owned by the Company or a Company Subsidiary (the
Company Owned Real Property).
(ii) The Company Owned Real Property and all real property
interests leased or otherwise held by the Company and the
Company Subsidiaries (the Company Leased Real
Property and, together with the Company Owned Real
Property, the Company Real Property)
constitute all of the real property occupied or used by the
Company and the Company Subsidiaries in connection with the
operation of their respective businesses as currently conducted.
The Company or a Company Subsidiary has a valid leasehold
interest in or valid rights to all material Company Leased Real
Property. The Company has made available to Parent true and
complete copies of all material leases of the Company Leased
Real Property (the Company Leases). No
option, extension or renewal has been exercised under any
Company Lease except options, extensions or renewals that would
not have a material and adverse impact on the Companys
ability to conduct its mining operations at any of its business
units, whose exercise has been evidenced by a written document,
a true and complete copy of which has been made available to
Parent with the corresponding Company Lease. Each of the Company
and the Company Subsidiaries has complied in all material
respects with the terms of all Company Leases to which it is a
party and under which it is in occupancy, and all such Company
Leases are in full force and effect. To the knowledge of the
Company, the lessors under the Company Leases to which the
Company or a Company Subsidiary is a party have complied in all
material respects with the terms of their respective Company
Leases. Each of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries enjoys
peaceful and undisturbed possession under all such Company
Leases, except where a failure to do so, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or result in
a material adverse effect on the Company.
A-16
(iii) None of the Company Owned Real Property or Company
Leased Real Property is subject to any Liens (whether absolute,
accrued, contingent or otherwise), except Permitted Liens.
(iv) (A) The Company Entities have good and marketable
title to all properties, assets and rights relating to or used
or held for use in connection with the business of the Company
Entities and such properties, assets and rights comprise all of
the assets required for the conduct of the business of the
Company Entities as now being conducted and (B) all such
properties, assets and rights are in all material respects
adequate for the purposes for which such assets are currently
used or held for use, and are serviceable and in reasonably good
operating condition (subject to normal wear and tear), except in
each case where such failure would not reasonably be expected to
have or result in a material adverse effect on the Company.
(m) Company Intellectual Property.
(i) The term Company Intellectual
Property means all of the following that is owned
by, issued or licensed to the Company or the Company
Subsidiaries or used in the business of the Company or the
Company Subsidiaries: (A) all patents, trademarks, trade
names, trade dress, assumed names, service marks, logos,
copyrights, Internet domain names and corporate names together
with all applications, registrations, renewals and all goodwill
associated therewith; (B) all trade secrets and
confidential information (including customer lists, know-how,
formulae, manufacturing and production processes, research,
financial business information and marketing plans);
(C) information technologies (including software programs,
data and related documentation); and (D) other intellectual
property rights and all copies and tangible embodiments of any
of the foregoing in whatever form or medium.
(ii) (A) The Company or the Company Subsidiaries own
and possess all right, title and interest in and to, or have a
valid and enforceable license to use, the Company Intellectual
Property necessary for the operation of their respective
businesses as currently conducted; (B) no claim by any
third party contesting the validity, enforceability, use or
ownership of any of the Company Intellectual Property has been
made, is currently outstanding or is threatened and, to the
knowledge of the Company, there are no grounds for the same;
(C) neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries
has received any written notices of, or is aware of any facts
which indicate a likelihood of, any infringement or
misappropriation by, or other conflict with, any third party
with respect to the Company Intellectual Property; (D) to
the knowledge of the Company, neither the Company nor the
Company Subsidiaries nor the conduct of their respective
businesses has infringed, misappropriated or otherwise
conflicted with any intellectual property rights or other rights
of any third parties and neither the Company nor any of the
Company Subsidiaries is aware of any infringement,
misappropriation or conflict which will occur as a result of the
continued operation of the Companys and the Company
Subsidiaries respective businesses as currently conducted,
except, with respect to clauses (A), (B), (C) and (D), as
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a material adverse effect on the Company.
(iii) (A) The transactions contemplated by this
Agreement will have no material adverse effect on the right,
title and interest of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries
in and to the Company Intellectual Property; and (B) the
Company or each of the Company Subsidiaries, as the case may be,
has taken all necessary action to maintain and protect the
material Company Intellectual Property and, until the Effective
Time, shall continue to maintain and protect the material
Company Intellectual Property.
(n) Labor Agreements and Employee
Issues. The Company and the Company
Subsidiaries have made available to Parent all collective
bargaining agreements or other agreements with any union or
labor organization to which the Company or any of the Company
Subsidiaries is a party. The Company and the Company
Subsidiaries are in material compliance with each such
collective bargaining agreement or other agreement. The Company
is unaware of any effort, activity or proceeding of any labor
organization (or representative thereof) to organize any other
of its or their employees. The Company and the Company
Subsidiaries are not, and have not since December 31, 2006,
been subject to any pending, or to the knowledge of the Company,
threatened (i) unfair labor practice charges
and/or
complaint, (ii) grievance proceeding or arbitration
proceeding arising under any collective bargaining agreement or
other labor agreement to which the Company or any Company
Subsidiary is a party, (iii) claim, suit, action or
governmental investigation relating
A-17
to employees, including discrimination, wrongful discharge, or
violation of any state
and/or
federal statute relating to employment practices,
(iv) strike, lockout or dispute, slowdown or work stoppage
or (v) claim, suit, action or governmental investigation,
in respect of which any director, officer, employee or agent of
the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries is or may be
entitled to claim indemnification from the Company or any
Company Subsidiary, except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have or result in a
material adverse effect on the Company. Neither the Company nor
the Company Subsidiaries is a party to, or is otherwise bound
by, any consent decree with any Governmental Entity relating to
employees or employment practices of the Company or the Company
Subsidiaries.
(o) Certain
Contracts. Schedule 3.1(o) of the
Company Disclosure Letter sets forth a true and correct list of
each contract, arrangement, commitment or understanding to which
the Company or a Company Subsidiary is a party to or is bound
(i) which is a material contract (as such term
is defined in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC); (ii) that contains covenants that limit the
ability of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (or which,
following the consummation of the Merger, could restrict the
ability of the Surviving Corporation or any of its Affiliates)
to compete in any business or with any person or in any
geographic area or distribution or sales channel, or to sell,
supply or distribute any service or product, in each case, that
could reasonably be expected to be material to the business of
the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
(iii) pursuant to which the Company and its Subsidiaries
expect to pay or receive payments in excess of $100 million
during the 12 month period following the date hereof; or
(iv) which would prohibit or delay the consummation of any
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (each of the
foregoing, a Company Material
Contract). Each Company Material Contract is valid
and binding on the Company and any Company Subsidiary that is a
party thereto and, to the knowledge of the Company, each other
party thereto and is in full force and effect. There is no
default under any Company Material Contract by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries or, to the knowledge of the Company, by
any other party, and no event has occurred that with the lapse
of time or the giving of notice or both would constitute a
default thereunder by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or
to the knowledge of the Company, by any other party, in each
case except as would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on the Company. All contracts, agreements, arrangements
or understandings of any kind between any affiliate of the
Company (other than any wholly owned Company Subsidiary), on the
one hand, and the Company or any Company Subsidiary, on the
other hand, are on terms no less favorable to the Company or to
such Company Subsidiary than would be obtained with an
unaffiliated third party on an arms-length basis.
(p) Insurance. Section 3.1(p)
of the Company Disclosure Letter contains a list of all
material insurance policies that are owned by the Company or any
of the Company Subsidiaries or which names the Company or any of
the Company Subsidiaries as an insured (or loss payee),
including those which pertain to the Companys or any of
the Company Subsidiaries assets, employees or operations.
All such insurance policies are in full force and effect, are in
such amounts and cover such losses and risks as are consistent
with industry practice and, in the reasonable judgment of senior
management of the Company, are adequate to protect the
properties and businesses of the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries and all premiums due thereunder have been paid.
Neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries is in
material breach or default under, or has received notice of
cancellation of, any such insurance policies.
(q) Interested Party
Transactions. No event has occurred since
December 31, 2007 that would be required to be reported by
the Company pursuant to Item 404(a) of
Regulation S-K
promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act.
(r) Voting Requirement. The
affirmative vote at the Company Stockholders Meeting of at least
a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of
outstanding shares of Company Common Stock to adopt this
Agreement is the only vote of the holders of any class or series
of the Companys capital stock necessary to adopt and
approve this Agreement and the Merger and the transactions
contemplated hereby (collectively, the Company
Stockholder Approval).
(s) State Takeover Statutes. The
Board of Directors of the Company has taken all necessary action
so that no fair price, moratorium,
control share acquisition or other anti-takeover Law
(each, a Takeover Statute) (including
the interested stockholder provisions codified in
Section 203 of the DGCL) or any anti-
A-18
takeover provision in the Company Charter or the Companys
by-laws is applicable to this Agreement, the Merger and the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The Board of
Directors of the Company has (i) duly and validly approved
this Agreement, (ii) determined that the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best
interests of the Company and its stockholders, and
(iii) resolved to recommend to such stockholders that they
vote in favor of the Merger, subject to
Section 4.2(c).
(t) Opinion of Financial
Advisor. The Company has received the opinion
of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., dated the date of this
Agreement, to the effect that, as of such date, the Merger
Consideration is fair from a financial point of view to holders
of shares of Company Common Stock, a signed copy of which
opinion has been delivered to Parent.
(u) Brokers. Except for Citigroup
Global Markets Inc., no broker, investment banker, financial
advisor or other person is entitled to any brokers,
finders, financial advisors or other similar fee or
commission in connection with the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of
the Company. The Company has furnished to Parent true and
complete copies of all agreements under which any such fees,
commissions or expenses are payable and all indemnification and
other agreements related to the engagement, in connection with
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, of the persons
to whom such fees, commissions or expenses are payable.
Section 3.2 Representations
and Warranties of Parent and Merger
Sub. Subject only to those exceptions and
qualifications listed and described (including an identification
by section reference to the representations and warranties to
which such exceptions and qualifications relate) on the
disclosure letter delivered by Parent and Merger Sub to the
Company prior to the execution of this Agreement (the
Parent Disclosure Letter),
provided, however, that a matter disclosed in the Parent
Disclosure Letter with respect to one representation or warranty
shall also be deemed to be disclosed with respect to each other
representation or warranty to the extent it is reasonably
apparent from the text of such disclosure that such disclosure
applies to or qualifies such other representation or warranty,
and except as set forth in the Recent Parent SEC Reports, each
of Parent and Merger Sub hereby represents and warrants to the
Company as follows:
(a) Organization, Standing and Corporate
Power. Each of Parent and Merger Sub is a
corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing (with respect to jurisdictions that recognize such
concept) under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation
and has the requisite corporate authority to carry on its
business as now being conducted. Each of Parent and Merger Sub
is duly qualified or licensed to do business and is in good
standing (with respect to jurisdictions that recognize such
concept) in each jurisdiction in which the nature of its
business or the ownership, leasing or operation of its
properties makes such qualification or licensing necessary,
except for those jurisdictions where the failure to be so
qualified or licensed or to be in good standing, individually or
in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on Parent. Parent has made
available to the Company prior to the execution of this
Agreement complete and correct copies of the certificate of
incorporation and the bylaws of Parent and Merger Sub, each as
amended to date.
(b) Subsidiaries. All outstanding
shares of capital stock of, or other equity interests in, each
subsidiary of Parent (collectively, the Parent
Subsidiaries and, together with Parent, the
Parent Entities) (i) have been
validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable,
(ii) are free and clear of all Liens other than Permitted
Liens and (iii) are free of any other restriction
(including any restriction on the right to vote, sell or
otherwise dispose of such capital stock or other ownership
interests). All outstanding shares of capital stock (or
equivalent equity interests of entities other than corporations)
of each of the Parent Subsidiaries are beneficially owned,
directly or indirectly, by Parent. Parent does not, directly or
indirectly, own more than 20% but less than 100% of the capital
stock or other equity interest in any person other than the
Parent Subsidiaries.
(c) Capital Structure. The
authorized capital stock of Parent consists entirely of
(i) 224,000,000 shares of Parent Common Stock and
(ii) 7,000,000 shares of preferred stock of Parent, of
which (x) 3,000,000 shares have been designated as
Serial Preferred Stock, Class A, without par value, of
which 172,500 shares have been designated as 3.25%
Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock
(Series A-2
Preferred Stock), and
(y) 4,000,000 shares have been designated as Serial
Preferred Stock, Class B, without par value.
A-19
At the close of business on July 14, 2008:
(i) 104,145,300 shares of Parent Common Stock were
issued and outstanding (including 1,936,799 shares of
restricted stock); (ii) 30,478,228 shares of Parent
Common Stock were held by Parent in its treasury;
(iii) 19,555 shares of
Series A-2
Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding and no shares of
Parent Common Stock were reserved for issuance in connection
with the conversion of the
Series A-2
Preferred Stock; and (iv) no shares of Parent Common Stock
were subject to issued and outstanding options to purchase
Parent Common Stock granted under Parents 2007 Incentive
Equity Plan (the 2007 Incentive Plan),
Parents 1992 Incentive Equity Plan, as amended (the
1992 IEP), Parents 1996
Nonemployee Directors Compensation Plan, as amended and
restated (the 1996 Directors
Plan), Parents Nonemployee Directors
Deferred Compensation Plan (the Directors
DCP), and Parents Long-Term Incentive
Program (the Parent LTIP and, together
with the 2007 Incentive Plan, the 1992 IEP, the
1996 Directors Plan, the Directors DCP, and the
Parent LTIP, the Parent Stock Plans
and such stock options, collectively the
Parent Stock Options). Parent has made
available to the Company a list, as of the close of business on
July 14, 2008, of the number of performance share grants
issued for the
2006-2008,
2007-2009
and
2008-2010
performance periods. The shares of
Series A-2
Preferred Stock that are issued and outstanding are entitled to
vote on the Merger together with the Parent Common Stock, as a
single class and each share of
Series A-2
Preferred Stock is entitled to one vote thereon. As of the close
of business on July 14, 2008, each share of
Series A-2
Preferred Stock is currently convertible into
133.0646 shares of Parent Common Stock at a conversion
price of $7.52 per share of Parent Common Stock. As of
July 14, 2008, the total number of votes entitled to be
cast at the Parent Stockholders Meeting with respect to the
transactions contemplated hereby is 104,164,855. All outstanding
shares of capital stock of Parent are, and all shares that may
be issued will be, when issued, duly authorized, validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable and not subject to or issued in
violation of preemptive rights. Except as otherwise provided in
this Section 3.2(c), there are not issued, reserved
for issuance or outstanding (i) any shares of capital stock
or other voting securities of Parent, (ii) any securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of
capital stock or voting securities of Parent or any Parent
Subsidiary, or (iii) any warrants, calls, options or other
rights to acquire from Parent or any Parent Subsidiary any
capital stock, voting securities or securities convertible into
or exchangeable or exercisable for capital stock or voting
securities of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary. Except as
otherwise provided in this Section 3.2(c), there are
no outstanding obligations of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary to
(i) issue, deliver or sell, or caused to be issued,
delivered or sold, any capital stock, voting securities or
securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
capital stock or voting securities of Parent or any Parent
Subsidiary or (ii) repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire
any such securities. Neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary is
a party to any voting agreement with respect to the voting of
any such securities. Except as otherwise provided in this
Section 3.2(c), there are no agreements,
arrangements or commitments of any character (contingent or
otherwise) pursuant to which any person is or may be entitled to
receive from Parent or a Parent Subsidiary any payment based on
the revenues, earnings or financial performance of Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary or assets or calculated in accordance
therewith.
(d) Authority;
Noncontravention. Each of Parent and Merger
Sub has all requisite corporate power and authority to enter
into this Agreement and, subject to the Parent Stockholder
Approval, to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by
Parent and Merger Sub and the consummation by Parent and Merger
Sub of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly
authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of
Parent and Merger Sub, respectively, subject to the Parent
Stockholder Approval. This Agreement has been duly executed and
delivered by each of Parent and Merger Sub and, assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery by the Company,
constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of Parent
and Merger Sub enforceable against Parent and Merger Sub in
accordance with its terms, except as the enforcement thereof may
be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization,
moratorium or similar Laws generally affecting the rights of
creditors and subject to general equity principles. The
execution and delivery of this Agreement does not, and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
and compliance with the provisions of this Agreement will not,
(i) conflict with the articles of incorporation or by-laws
(or comparable organizational documents) of any of the Parent
Entities, (ii) assuming that all the consents, approvals
and filings referred to in the next sentence are duly obtained
and/or made,
(A) result in any breach, violation or default (with or
without notice or lapse of time, or both) under, or give rise to
a right of termination, cancellation or creation or
A-20
acceleration of any obligation or loss of a benefit under, or
result in the creation of any Lien upon any of the properties or
assets of Parent or Merger Sub under any loan or credit
agreement, note, bond, mortgage, indenture, lease or other
agreement, instrument, permit, concession, franchise, license or
other authorization applicable to any of the Parent Entities or
by which their respective properties or assets are bound, or
(B) conflict with or violate any judgment, order, decree or
Law applicable to Parent, Merger Sub or their respective
properties or assets, other than, in the case of clause (ii)
(A) and (B) and (iii) any such conflicts,
breaches, violations, defaults, rights, losses or Liens that,
individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on
Parent. No consent, approval, order or authorization of, action
by or in respect of, or registration, declaration or filing
with, any Governmental Entity or third party is required by
Parent or Merger Sub in connection with the execution and
delivery of this Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub or the
consummation by Parent and Merger Sub of the transactions
contemplated hereby, except for: (i) the filing with the
SEC of (A) the
Form S-4
and a proxy
statement/prospectus
relating to the Parent Stockholders Meeting and (B) such
reports under Section 13(a), 13(d), 15(d) or 16(a) or such
other applicable sections of the Exchange Act as may be required
in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby; (ii) the filing of the Certificate of
Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware;
(iii) the filing of a premerger notification and report
form by Parent under the HSR Act; (iv) filings with and
approvals of the NYSE to permit the shares of Parent Common
Stock that are to be issued in the Merger to be listed on the
NYSE; (v) such governmental consents, qualifications or
filings as are customarily obtained or made in connection with
the transfer of interests or the change of control of ownership
in properties used for the mining, processing or shipping of
coal or iron ore, including notices and consents relating to or
in connection with mining, reclamation and environmental
Permits, in each case under the applicable Laws of Alabama,
Michigan, Kentucky, Virginia, Minnesota, West Virginia,
Pennsylvania, United States, Australia, and Canada, and
(vi) such consents, approvals, orders or authorizations the
failure of which to be made or obtained, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or result in
a material adverse effect on Parent.
(e) SEC Reports and Financial Statements; Undisclosed
Liabilities; Internal Controls.
(i) Parent has timely filed all required reports,
schedules, forms, statements and other documents (including
exhibits and all other information incorporated therein) under
the Securities Act and the Exchange Act with the SEC since
December 31, 2006 (as such reports, schedules, forms,
statements and documents have been amended since the time of
their filing, collectively, the Parent SEC
Documents). As of their respective dates, or if
amended prior to the date of this Agreement, as of the date of
the last such amendment, the Parent SEC Documents complied in
all material respects with the requirements of the Securities
Act or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the rules and
regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder applicable to such
Parent SEC Documents, and none of the Parent SEC Documents when
filed, or as so amended, contained any untrue statement of a
material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading. As of the date of this Agreement, there
are no outstanding or unresolved comments in comment letters
received from the SEC staff.
(ii) The financial statements of Parent included in the
Parent SEC Documents, comply as to form, as of their respective
date of filing with the SEC, in all material respects with
applicable accounting requirements and the published rules and
regulations of the SEC with respect thereto, have been prepared
in accordance with GAAP (except, in the case of unaudited
statements, as permitted by
Form 10-Q
of the SEC) applied on a consistent basis during the periods
involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto), and
on that basis fairly present in all material respects the
consolidated financial position of Parent and the Parent
Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and the consolidated
statements of income, cash flows and stockholders equity
for the periods then ended (subject, in the case of unaudited
statements, to normal recurring year-end audit adjustments). No
Parent Subsidiary is required to make any filings with the SEC.
Except as disclosed in the Parent SEC Documents filed since
December 31, 2007 and prior to the date of this Agreement
(the Recent Parent SEC Reports), since
December 31, 2007, Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries have
not incurred any liabilities (direct, contingent or otherwise)
that are of a nature that would be required to be disclosed on a
balance sheet of Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries or the
A-21
footnotes thereto prepared in conformity with GAAP, other than
(A) liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business
and (B) liabilities that, individually or in the aggregate,
would not reasonably be expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on Parent.
(iii) The records, systems, controls, data and information
of Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries are recorded, stored,
maintained and operated under means (including any electronic,
mechanical or photographic process, whether computerized or not)
that are under the exclusive ownership and direct control of
Parent or the Parent Subsidiaries or their accountants
(including all means of access thereto and therefrom) except for
any non-exclusive ownership and non-direct control that would
not reasonably be expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on the system of internal accounting controls
described in the following sentence. As and to the extent
described in the Parent SEC Documents, Parent and the Parent
Subsidiaries have devised and maintain a system of internal
accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
Parent (A) has implemented and maintains disclosure
controls and procedures (as required by
Rule 13a-15(a)
of the Exchange Act) designed to ensure that material
information relating to Parent, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to the management of Parent by
others within those entities, and (B) has disclosed, based
on its most recent evaluation prior to the date hereof, to
Parents auditors and the audit committee of Parents
Board of Directors (1) any significant deficiencies or
material weakness in the design or operation of internal
controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect in any
material respect Parents ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and (2) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in Parents internal
controls. Parent has made available to the Company a summary of
any such disclosure made by the Parent management to the
Parents auditors or audit committee of the Parents
Board of Directors since December 31, 2007.
(f) Information Supplied. None of
the information supplied or to be supplied by Parent or Merger
Sub specifically for inclusion or incorporation by reference in
(i) the
Form S-4
will, at the time the
Form S-4
becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they are made, not misleading, or (ii) the Joint Proxy
Statement will, at the date it is first mailed to the
Companys stockholders and Parents stockholders or at
the time of the Parent Stockholders Meeting or the Company
Stockholders Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they are made, not
misleading. The
Form S-4
and the Joint Proxy Statement will comply as to form in all
material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder, except that no
representation or warranty is made by Parent or Merger Sub with
respect to statements made or incorporated by reference therein
based on information supplied by the Company specifically for
inclusion or incorporation by reference in the
Form S-4
or the Joint Proxy Statement, as the case may be.
(g) Absence of Certain Changes or
Events. Except for liabilities incurred in
connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated
hereby, since December 31, 2007, (i) each of the
Parent Entities has conducted their respective operations only
in the ordinary course consistent with past practice,
(ii) there has not been any event, circumstance, change,
occurrence or state of facts that, individually or in the
aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on Parent and, (iii) none of the
Parent Entities has taken any action that if taken after the
date of this Agreement would constitute a violation of
Section 4.1(b).
(h) Compliance with Applicable Laws;
Litigation.
(i) The operations of the Parent Entities have not been
since January 1, 2006 and are not being conducted in
violation of any Law (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001) or any Permit necessary
for the conduct of their respective businesses as currently
conducted, except where such violations, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have
A-22
or result in a material adverse effect on Parent. None of the
Parent Entities has received any written notice, or has
knowledge of any claim, alleging any such violation.
(ii) The Parent Entities hold all Permits necessary for the
conduct of their respective businesses as currently conducted,
except where the failure to hold such Permits, individually or
in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on Parent. None of the
Parent Entities has received written notice that any such Permit
will be terminated or modified or cannot be renewed in the
ordinary course of business, and Parent has no knowledge of any
reasonable basis for any such termination, modification or
nonrenewal, except for such terminations, modifications or
nonrenewals as, individually or in the aggregate, would not
reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse
effect on Parent. The execution, delivery and performance of
this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby do not and will not violate any such Permit,
or result in any termination, modification or nonrenewals
thereof, except for such violations, terminations, modifications
or nonrenewals thereof as, individually or in the aggregate,
would not reasonably be expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on Parent.
(iii) There is no suit, action or proceeding by or before
any Governmental Entity pending (or, to the knowledge of Parent,
threatened), except for any such suit, action or proceeding that
challenges or seeks to prohibit the execution, delivery or
performance of this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated hereby, to which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary is
a party or against Parent or any Parent Subsidiary or any of
their properties or assets that would reasonably be expected to
have or result in a material adverse effect on Parent. As of the
date hereof, there is no suit, action or proceeding by or before
any Governmental Entity pending or, to the knowledge of Parent,
threatened against Parent or any Parent Subsidiary challenging
or seeking to prohibit the execution, delivery or performance
this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated hereby.
(i) Employee Benefit Plans.
(i) Parent has made available to the Company a true and
complete list of (A) each material bonus, pension, profit
sharing, deferred compensation, incentive compensation, stock
ownership, stock purchase, stock option, equity compensation,
retirement, vacation, employment, disability, death benefit,
hospitalization, medical insurance, life insurance, welfare,
severance or other employee benefit plan, agreement, arrangement
or understanding maintained by Parent or any Parent Subsidiary
or to which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary contributes or is
obligated to contribute with respect to its employees, and
(B) each change of control agreement providing benefits to
any current employee, officer or director of Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary, to which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary is a
party or by which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary is bound
(collectively, the Parent Benefit
Plans). With respect to each Parent Benefit Plan,
no event has occurred and there exists no condition or set of
circumstances in connection with which Parent or any Parent
Subsidiary could be subject to any liability that, individually
or in the aggregate, would reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on Parent. Neither Parent
nor any Parent Subsidiary has any liability (including
contingent liability) with respect to any plan, agreement,
arrangement or understanding of the type described in this
paragraph other than the Parent Benefit Plans, other than
liability that, individually or in the aggregate, would not
reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse
effect on the Parent.
(ii) Each Parent Benefit Plan has been administered in
accordance with its terms, all applicable Laws, including ERISA
and the Code, and the terms of all applicable collective
bargaining agreements, except for any failures so to administer
any Parent Benefit Plan that, individually or in the aggregate,
would not reasonably be expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on Parent. Parent and all Parent Benefit Plans
are in compliance with the applicable provisions of ERISA, the
Code and all other applicable Laws and the terms of all
applicable collective bargaining agreements, except for any
failures to be in such compliance that, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or result in
a material adverse effect on Parent. Each Parent Benefit Plan
that is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a),
401(k) or 4975(e)(7) of the Code has received a favorable
determination letter from the IRS as to its qualified status
and, to the knowledge of Parent, there exist no facts or
circumstances that
A-23
have caused or could cause a failure to be so qualified under
Section 401(a), 401(k) or 4975(e)(7) of the Code. No fact
or event has occurred which is reasonably likely to affect
adversely the qualified status of any such Parent Benefit Plan
or the exempt status of any such trust, except for any
occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate, would not
reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse
effect on Parent. All contributions to, and payments from, the
Parent Benefit Plans that are required to have been made in
accordance with such Parent Benefit Plans, ERISA or the Code
have been timely made other than any failures that, individually
or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on Parent. All trusts
providing funding for Parent Benefit Plans that are intended to
comply with Section 501(c)(9) of the Code are exempt from
federal income taxation and, together with any other welfare
benefit funds (as defined in Section 419(e)(1) of the Code)
maintained in connection with any of the Parent Benefit Plans,
have been operated and administered in compliance with all
applicable requirements such that neither Parent, any Parent
Subsidiary, any Parent Benefit Plan nor such trust or fund is
subject to any taxes, penalties or other liabilities imposed as
a consequence of failure to comply with such requirements, other
than any liability that, individually or in the aggregate, would
not reasonably be expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on the Parent. No welfare benefit fund (as
defined in Section 419(e)(1) of the Code) maintained in
connection with any of the Parent Benefit Plans has provided any
disqualified benefit (as defined in
Section 4976(b)(1) of the Code) for which Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary has or had any liability for the excise tax
imposed by Section 4976 of the Code which has not been paid
in full, other than any liability that, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or result in
a material adverse effect on the Parent.
(iii) Other than as would not reasonably be expected to
have or result in a material adverse effect on the Parent,
neither Parent nor any trade or business, whether or not
incorporated, which, together with Parent, would be deemed to be
a single employer within the meaning of
Section 4001(b) of ERISA or Section 414(b) or 414(c)
of the Code (a Parent ERISA Affiliate)
has incurred any liability under Title IV of ERISA (other
than for premiums pursuant to Section 4007 of ERISA which
have been timely paid) or Section 4971 of the Code, and no
condition exists that presents a risk to Parent or any Parent
ERISA Affiliate of incurring any such liability or failure. None
of the Parent Benefit Plans (other than Multiemployer Plans) are
defined benefit plans within the meaning of ERISA or subject to
the minimum funding requirements of Section 412 of the Code
or Section 302 of ERISA.
(iv) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on the Parent, no Parent
Benefit Plan provides medical or life insurance benefits
(whether or not insured) with respect to current or former
employees or officers or directors after retirement or other
termination of service, other than any such coverage required by
Law, and Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries have reserved all
rights necessary to amend or terminate each of the Parent
Benefit Plans without the consent of any other person.
(v) The consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement will not, either alone or in combination with
another event, (A) entitle any current or former employee,
officer or director of Parent or the Parent Subsidiaries to
severance pay, unemployment compensation or any other payment,
except as expressly provided in this Agreement, or
(B) accelerate the time of payment or vesting, or increase
the amount of compensation due any such employee, officer or
director.
(vi) Neither the Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary is a
party to any agreement, contract or arrangement (including this
Agreement) that could result, separately or in the aggregate, in
the payment of any excess parachute payments within
the meaning of Section 280G of the Code. No Parent Benefit
Plan provides for the reimbursement of excise taxes under
Section 4999 of the Code or any income taxes under the Code.
(vii) With respect to each Parent Benefit Plan, Parent has
delivered or made available to the Company a true and complete
copy of: (A) Parent Benefit Plan, including all Parent
Benefit Plan documents and trust agreements; (B) the most
recent Annual Reports (Form 5500 Series) and accompanying
schedules, if any; (C) the most recent annual financial
report, if any; (D) the most recent actuarial report, if
any; and (E) the most recent determination letter from the
Internal Revenue Service, if any.
A-24
Except as specifically provided in the foregoing documents
delivered or made available to the Company or in the Parent
Disclosure Letter, there are no material amendments to any
Parent Benefit Plan that have been adopted or approved nor has
Parent or any Parent Subsidiary undertaken to make any such
material amendments or to adopt or approve any new Parent
Benefit Plan.
(viii) No Parent Benefit Plan is a Multiemployer Plan or a
Multiple Employer Plan. None of the Parent, the Parent
Subsidiaries nor any of their respective Parent ERISA Affiliates
has, at any time during the last six years, contributed to or
been obligated to contribute to any Multiemployer Plan or
Multiple Employer Plan. None of Parent, the Parent Subsidiaries
nor any of their respective Parent ERISA Affiliates has incurred
any material withdrawal liability under a Multiemployer Plan
that has not been satisfied in full, nor does Parent have any
material contingent liability with respect to any withdrawal
from any Multiemployer Plan. None of Parent, the Parent
Subsidiaries nor any of their respective Parent ERISA Affiliates
would incur any material withdrawal liability (within the
meaning of Part 1 of Subtitle E of Title I of ERISA) if
Parent, the Parent Subsidiaries or any of their respective
Parent ERISA Affiliates withdrew (within the meaning of
Part 1 of Subtitle E of Title I of ERISA) on or prior
to the Closing Date from each Multiemployer Plan to which
Parent, the Parent Subsidiaries or any of their respective
Parent ERISA Affiliates has an obligation to contribute on the
date of this Agreement. To the knowledge of the Parent, no
Multiemployer Plan to which Parent, the Parent Subsidiaries or
any of their respective Parent ERISA Affiliates contributes or
otherwise has any liability (contingent or otherwise) has
incurred an accumulated funding deficiency within the meaning of
Section 431(a) of the Code or Section 304(a) of ERISA, is
insolvent, is in reorganization (within the meaning of
Section 4241 of ERISA), is reasonably likely to commence
reorganization, is in endangered or
critical status (as such terms are defined in
Section 432 of the Code) or is reasonably likely to be in
endangered or critical status.
(ix) There are no pending or threatened claims (other than
claims for benefits in the ordinary course), lawsuits or
arbitrations that have been asserted or instituted, or to
Parents knowledge, no set of circumstances exists that may
reasonably give rise to a claim or lawsuit, against the Parent
Benefit Plans, any fiduciaries thereof with respect to their
duties to the Parent Benefit Plans or the assets of any of the
trusts under any of the Parent Benefit Plans that could
reasonably be expected to result in any material liability of
Parent or any Parent Subsidiaries to the PBGC, the United States
Department of Treasury, the United States Department of Labor,
any Multiemployer Plan, any Parent Benefit Plan, any participant
in a Parent Benefit Plan, any employee benefit plan with respect
to which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary has any contingent
liability, or any participant in an employee benefit plan with
respect to which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary has any
contingent liability, other than any liability that,
individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on the
Parent.
(x) To the knowledge of the Parent, there have been no
prohibited transactions or breaches of any of the duties imposed
on fiduciaries (within the meaning of
Section 3(21) of ERISA) by ERISA with respect to the Parent
Benefit Plans that could result in any liability or excise tax
under ERISA or the Code being imposed on Parent or any of the
Parent Subsidiaries, other than any liability that, individually
or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in a material adverse effect on the Parent.
(xi) All contributions, transfers and payments in respect
of any Parent Benefit Plan, other than transfers incident to an
incentive stock option plan within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Code, have been or are fully deductible
under the Code, except as would not reasonably be expected to
have or result in a material adverse effect on the Parent.
(xii) With respect to any insurance policy that has, or
does, provide funding for benefits under any Parent Benefit
Plan, to the knowledge of the Parent, no insurance company
issuing any such policy is in receivership, conservatorship,
liquidation or similar proceeding and, to the knowledge of
Parent, no such proceedings with respect to any insurer are
imminent.
(xiii) For purposes of this Section 3.2(i)
only, the term employee will be
considered to include individuals rendering personal services to
Parent or any Parent Subsidiary as independent contractors.
A-25
(j) Taxes. (i) Except as
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a material adverse effect on Parent, Parent and each
Parent Subsidiary have timely filed all Tax Returns required to
be filed, and all such returns are true, correct, and complete;
(ii) Parent and each Parent Subsidiary has paid all Taxes
due whether or not shown on any Tax Return, except, in the cases
of (i) and (ii) hereof, with respect to Taxes that are
being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings;
(iii) there are no pending or, to the knowledge of Parent,
threatened, audits, examinations, investigations or other
proceedings in respect of Taxes relating to Parent or any Parent
Subsidiary; (iv) there are no Liens for Taxes upon the
assets of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary, other than Liens for
Taxes not yet due and Liens for Taxes that are being contested
in good faith by appropriate proceedings; (v) neither
Parent nor any of the Parent Subsidiaries has any liability for
Taxes of any person (other than Parent and the Parent
Subsidiaries) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
(or any comparable provision of Law) as a transferee or
successor, by contract, or otherwise; (vi) neither Parent
nor any Parent Subsidiary is a party to any agreement or
arrangement relating to the allocation, sharing or
indemnification of Taxes; (vii) neither Parent nor any
Parent Subsidiary has taken any action or knows of any fact,
agreement, plan or other circumstance that is reasonably likely
to prevent the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code; (viii) no
deficiencies for any Taxes have been proposed, asserted or
assessed against Parent or any Parent Subsidiary for which
adequate reserves in accordance with GAAP have not been created;
(ix) neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary will be
required to include any adjustment in taxable income for any
Post-Closing Tax Period under Section 481(c) of the Code
(or any comparable provision of Law) as a result of a change in
method of accounting for any Pre-Closing Tax Period or pursuant
to the provisions of any agreement entered into with any taxing
authority with regard to the Tax liability of Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary for any Pre-Closing Tax Period; (x) the
financial statements included in the Parent SEC Documents
reflect an adequate reserve in accordance with GAAP for all
Taxes for which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary may be liable
for all taxable periods and portions thereof through the date
hereof; (xi) no person has granted any extension or waiver
of the statute of limitations period applicable to any Tax of
Parent or any Parent Subsidiary or any affiliated, combined or
unitary group of which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary is or was
a member, which period (after giving effect to such extension or
waiver) has not yet expired, and there is no currently effective
closing agreement pursuant to Section 7121 of
the Code (or any similar provision of foreign, state or local
Law); (xii) Parent and each Parent Subsidiary have withheld
and remitted to the appropriate taxing authority all Taxes
required to have been withheld and remitted in connection with
any amounts paid or owing to any employee, independent
contractor, creditor, stockholder, or other third party, and
have complied in all material respects with all applicable Laws
relating to information reporting; (xiii) neither Parent
nor any Parent Subsidiary has distributed the stock of another
person or has had its stock distributed by another person, in a
transaction that was purported or intended to be governed in
whole or in part by Section 355 or Section 361 of the
Code; (xiv) neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary has
participated in any transaction that has been identified by the
Internal Revenue Service in any published guidance as a
listed transaction (as defined in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4);
and (xv) the consolidated federal income Tax Returns of
Parent have been examined, or the statute of limitations has
closed, with respect to all taxable years through and including
2003.
(k) Environmental Matters.
(i) Except where noncompliance, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have or result in
a material adverse effect on Parent, the Parent Entities are and
have been for the past three years in compliance with all
applicable Environmental, Health and Safety Laws and
Environmental Permits.
(ii) There are no written Environmental, Health and Safety
Claims pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened,
against Parent or any Parent Subsidiary and, to the knowledge of
Parent, there are no existing conditions, circumstances or facts
which could give rise to an Environmental, Health and Safety
Claim, other than Environmental, Health and Safety Claims or
conditions, circumstances or facts as would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on
Parent.
(iii) Parent has made available to the Company all material
information, including such studies, reports, correspondence,
notices of violation, requests for information, audits, analyses
and test results and any other documents, in the possession,
custody or control of the Parent Entities relating to
(A) the
A-26
Parent Entities compliance or noncompliance within the
previous two years with Environmental, Health and Safety Laws
and Environmental Permits, and (B) Environmental Conditions
on, under or about any of the properties or assets owned,
leased, operated or otherwise used by any of the Parent Entities
at the present time or for which any of the Parent Entities may
be responsible or liable.
(iv) No Hazardous Substance has been generated, treated,
stored, disposed of, used, handled or manufactured at, or
transported, shipped or disposed of from, currently or
previously owned, leased, operated or otherwise used properties
in violation of applicable Environmental, Health and Safety Laws
or Environmental Permits that, individually or in the aggregate,
would reasonably be expected to have or result in a material
adverse effect on Parent, and there have been no Releases of any
Hazardous Substance in, on, under, from or affecting any
currently or previously owned, leased, operated or otherwise
used properties that, individually or in the aggregate, would
reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse
effect on Parent.
(v) None of Parent or the Parent Subsidiaries has received
from any Governmental Entity or other third party any written
(or, to the knowledge of Parent, other) notice that any of them
or any of their predecessors is or may be a potentially
responsible party in respect of, or may otherwise bear liability
for, any actual or threatened Release of any Hazardous Substance
at any site or facility that is, has been or could reasonably be
expected to be listed on the National Priorities List, the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Information System, the National Corrective Action Priority
System or any similar or analogous federal, state, provincial,
territorial, municipal, county, local or other domestic or
foreign list, schedule, inventory or database of Hazardous
Substance sites or facilities.
(vi) Neither this Agreement nor the transactions
contemplated hereby will result in any requirement for
environmental disclosure, investigation, cleanup, removal or
remedial action, or notification to or consent of any
Governmental Entity or third party, with respect to any property
owned, leased, operated or otherwise used by Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary, pursuant to any Environmental, Health and
Safety Law, including any so-called property transfer
law.
(vii) None of Parent or the Parent Subsidiaries has
assumed, undertaken or otherwise become subject to any liability
of any other person relating to or arising from Environmental,
Health and Safety Laws, except as would not reasonably be
expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on
Parent.
(viii) There exist no Environmental Conditions relating to
any currently or previously owned, leased, operated or otherwise
used properties which, individually or in the aggregate, would
reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse
effect on Parent.
(l) Real Property; Assets.
(i) The Parent or a Parent Subsidiary has good and
marketable title to each parcel of or interest in real property
owned by Parent or a Parent Subsidiary (the Parent
Owned Real Property).
(ii) The Parent Owned Real Property and all real property
interests leased or otherwise held by Parent and the Parent
Subsidiaries (the Parent Leased Real
Property) and, together with the Parent Owned Real
Property, the Parent Real Property)
constitute all of the real property occupied or used by Parent
and the Parent Subsidiaries in connection with the operation of
their respective businesses as currently conducted. Parent or a
Parent Subsidiary has a valid leasehold interest in or valid
rights to all material Parent Leased Real Property. Parent has
made available to the Company true and complete copies of all
material leases of the Parent Leased Real Property (the
Parent Leases). No option, extension
or renewal has been exercised under any Parent Lease except
options, extensions or renewals that would not have a material
and adverse impact on Parents ability to conduct its
mining operations at any of its business units, whose exercise
has been evidenced by a written document, a true and complete
copy of which has been made available to the Company with the
corresponding Parent Lease. Each of Parent and the Parent
Subsidiaries has complied in all material respects with the
terms of all Parent Leases to which it is a party and under
which it is in occupancy, and all such Parent Leases are in full
force and effect. To the knowledge of Parent, the lessors under
the Parent Leases to which Parent or a Parent
A-27
Subsidiary is a party have complied in all material respects
with the terms of their respective Parent Leases. Each of Parent
and the Parent Subsidiaries enjoys peaceful and undisturbed
possession under all such Parent Leases, except where a failure
to do so, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably
be expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on
Parent.
(iii) None of the Parent Owned Real Property or Parent
Leased Real Property is subject to any Liens (whether absolute,
accrued, contingent or otherwise), except Permitted Liens.
(iv) (A) The Parent Entities have good and marketable
title to all properties, assets and rights relating to or used
or held for use in connection with the business of the Parent
Entities and such properties, assets and rights comprise all of
the assets required for the conduct of the business of the
Parent Entities as now being conducted and (B) all such
properties, assets and rights are in all material respects
adequate for the purposes for which such assets are currently
used or held for use, and are serviceable and in reasonably good
operating condition (subject to normal wear and tear), except in
each case where such failure would not reasonably be expected to
have or result in a material adverse effect on Parent.
(m) Parent Intellectual Property.
(i) The term Parent Intellectual Property
means all of the following that is owned by, issued or
licensed to Parent or the Parent Subsidiaries or used in the
business of Parent or the Parent Subsidiaries: (A) all
patents, trademarks, trade names, trade dress, assumed names,
service marks, logos, copyrights, Internet domain names and
corporate names together with all applications, registrations,
renewals and all goodwill associated therewith; (B) all
trade secrets and confidential information (including customer
lists, know-how, formulae, manufacturing and production
processes, research, financial business information and
marketing plans); (C) information technologies (including
software programs, data and related documentation); and
(D) other intellectual property rights and all copies and
tangible embodiments of any of the foregoing in whatever form or
medium.
(ii) (A) Parent or the Parent Subsidiaries own and
possess all right, title and interest in and to, or have a valid
and enforceable license to use, the Parent Intellectual Property
necessary for the operation of their respective businesses as
currently conducted; (B) no claim by any third party
contesting the validity, enforceability, use or ownership of any
of the Parent Intellectual Property has been made, is currently
outstanding or is threatened and, to the knowledge of Parent,
there are no grounds for the same; (C) neither Parent nor
any of the Parent Subsidiaries has received any written notices
of, or is aware of any facts which indicate a likelihood of, any
infringement or misappropriation by, or other conflict with, any
third party with respect to the Parent Intellectual Property;
(D) to the knowledge of Parent, neither Parent nor the
Parent Subsidiaries nor the conduct of their respective
businesses has infringed, misappropriated or otherwise
conflicted with any intellectual property rights or other rights
of any third parties and neither Parent nor any of the Parent
Subsidiaries is aware of any infringement, misappropriation or
conflict which will occur as a result of the continued operation
of Parents and the Parent Subsidiaries respective
businesses as currently conducted except, with respect to
clauses (A), (B), (C) and (D), as would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material
adverse effect on Parent.
(iii) (A) The transactions contemplated by this
Agreement will have no material adverse effect on the right,
title and interest of Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries in and
to the Parent Intellectual Property; and (B) Parent or each
of the Parent Subsidiaries, as the case may be, has taken all
necessary action to maintain and protect the material Parent
Intellectual Property.
(n) Labor Agreements and Employee
Issues. Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries
have made available to the Company all collective bargaining
agreements or other agreements with any union or labor
organization to which Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries
is a party. Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries are in material
compliance with each such collective bargaining agreement or
other agreement. Parent is unaware of any effort, activity or
proceeding of any labor organization (or representative thereof)
to organize any other of its or their employees. Parent and the
Parent Subsidiaries are not subject to any pending, or to the
knowledge of Parent, threatened (i) unfair labor practice
charges
and/or
complaint, (ii) grievance proceeding or arbitration
A-28
proceeding arising under any collective bargaining agreement or
other labor agreement to which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary
is a party, (iii) claim, suit, action or governmental
investigation relating to employees, including discrimination,
wrongful discharge, or violation of any state
and/or
federal statute relating to employment practices,
(iv) strike, lockout or dispute, slowdown or work stoppage
or (v) claim, suit, action or governmental investigation,
in respect of which any director, officer, employee or agent of
Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries is or may be entitled
to claim indemnification from Parent or any Parent Subsidiary,
except for the foregoing which would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have or result in a
material adverse effect on Parent. Neither Parent nor the Parent
Subsidiaries is a party to, or is otherwise bound by, any
consent decree with any Governmental Entity relating to
employees or employment practices of Parent or the Parent
Subsidiaries.
(o) Certain
Contracts. Schedule 3.2(o) of the
Parent Disclosure Letter sets forth a true and correct list of
each contract, arrangement, commitment or understanding to which
Parent or a Parent Subsidiary is a party to or is bound
(i) which is a material contract (as such term
is defined in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC), (ii) that contains covenants that limit the
ability of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries (or which,
following the consummation of the Merger, could restrict the
ability of the Surviving Corporation or any of its Affiliates)
to compete in any business or with any person or in any
geographic area or distribution or sales channel, or to sell,
supply or distribute any service or product, in each case, that
could reasonably be expected to be material to the business of
Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
(iii) pursuant to which Parent and its Subsidiaries expect
to pay or receive payments in excess of $100 million during
the 12 month period following the date hereof; or
(iv) which would prohibit or delay the consummation of any
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (each of the
foregoing, a Parent Material
Contract). Each Parent Material Contract is valid
and binding on Parent and any Parent Subsidiary that is a party
thereto and, to the knowledge of Parent, each other party
thereto and is in full force and effect. There is no default
under any Parent Material Contract by Parent or any Parent
Subsidiary or, to the knowledge of Parent, by any other party,
and no event has occurred that with the lapse of time or the
giving of notice or both would constitute a default thereunder
by Parent or any of Parent Subsidiaries, or to the knowledge of
Parent, by any other party, in each case except as would not
reasonably be expected to have or result in, individually or in
the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Parent. All
contracts, agreements, arrangements or understandings of any
kind between any affiliate of Parent (other than any wholly
owned Parent Subsidiary), on the one hand, and Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary, on the other hand, are on terms no less
favorable to Parent or to such Parent Subsidiary than would be
obtained with an unaffiliated third party on an
arms-length basis.
(p) Insurance. Section 3.2(p)
of the Parent Disclosure Letter contains a list of all material
insurance policies that are owned by Parent or any of the Parent
Subsidiaries or which names Parent or any of the Parent
Subsidiaries as an insured (or loss payee), including those
which pertain to Parents or any of the Parent
Subsidiaries assets, employees or operations. All such
insurance policies are in full force and effect, are in such
amounts and cover such losses and risks as are consistent with
industry practice and, in the reasonable judgment of senior
management of Parent, are adequate to protect the properties and
businesses of Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries and all
premiums due thereunder have been paid. Neither Parent nor any
of the Parent Subsidiaries is in material breach or default
under, or has received notice of cancellation of any such
insurance policies.
(q) Interested Party
Transactions. No event has occurred since
December 31, 2007 that would be required to be reported by
Parent pursuant to Item 404(a) of
Regulation S-K
promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act.
(r) Voting Requirement. The
affirmative vote at the Parent Stockholders Meeting of at least
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of
outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock and
Series A-2
Preferred Stock, voting together as a class, is the only vote of
the holders of any class or series of Parents capital
stock necessary to approve this Agreement and the Merger and the
transactions contemplated hereby (the Parent
Stockholder Approval).
A-29
(s) Opinion of Financial
Advisor. Parent has received the opinion of
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., dated as of the date of this
Agreement, to the effect that, as of such date, the Merger
Consideration is fair from a financial point of view to Parent,
a signed copy of which opinion has been delivered to the Company.
(t) Brokers. Except for
J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., no broker, investment banker,
financial advisor or other person is entitled to any
brokers, finders, financial advisors or other
similar fee or commission in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement based upon arrangements made by
or on behalf of Parent. Parent has furnished to the Company true
and complete copies of all agreements under which any such fees,
commissions or expenses are payable and all indemnification and
other agreements related to the engagement, in connection with
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, of persons to
whom such fees, commissions or expenses are payable.
(u) Availability of Funds. Parent
has fully committed debt financing in an amount sufficient to
pay the Cash Consideration and all fees, expenses and other
amounts contemplated to be paid by Parent or its Affiliates by
this Agreement, and Parent has provided the Company true,
correct and accurate copies of the commitment letters in respect
of such debt financing. At the Closing, Parent will have
available cash in an amount sufficient for Parent and Merger Sub
to timely pay the Cash Consideration and all fees, expenses and
other amounts contemplated to be paid by Parent or its
Affiliates by this Agreement.
ARTICLE IV
COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
Section 4.1 Conduct
of Business.
(a) Conduct of Business by the
Company. Except as (w) set forth on
Section 4.1(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter,
(x) required by applicable Law, (y) permitted or
contemplated by this Agreement or (z) consented to in
writing by Parent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld,
delayed or conditioned), during the period from the date of this
Agreement to the Effective Time, the Company shall, and shall
cause the Company Subsidiaries to, carry on their respective
businesses in all material respects in accordance with their
ordinary course consistent with past practice and, to the extent
consistent therewith, subject to the restrictions set forth
below in this Section 4.1(a), use reasonable best
efforts to preserve intact their current business organizations,
keep available the services of their current officers and other
key managers and preserve their relationships with customers,
suppliers, distributors and other persons having business
dealings with them. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, except as (w) set forth on
Section 4.1(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter,
(x) required by applicable Law, (y) contemplated by
this Agreement or (z) consented to in writing by Parent
(such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or
conditioned), during the period from the date of this Agreement
to the Effective Time, the Company shall not and shall not
permit any Company Subsidiary to:
(i) (A) other than dividends and distributions by a
direct or indirect wholly owned Company Subsidiary to its
parent, declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or make any
other distributions in respect of, any of its capital stock,
(B) split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock
or (C) except pursuant to agreements entered into with
respect to the Company Stock Plans that are in effect as of the
close of business on the date of this Agreement, purchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of capital stock of the
Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries or any other
securities thereof or any rights, warrants or options to acquire
any such shares or other securities;
(ii) except as set forth in Section 4.1(a)(ii) of
the Company Disclosure Letter, issue or authorize the
issuance of, deliver, sell, pledge or otherwise encumber or
subject to any Lien (except Permitted Liens), any shares of its
capital stock (or any other securities in respect of, in lieu
of, or in substitution for, shares of its capital stock), any
other voting securities or any securities convertible into, or
any rights, warrants or options to acquire, any such shares,
voting securities or convertible securities, other than the
issuance of shares of Company Common Stock upon the exercise of
the Company Stock Options under the Company Stock Plans or in
connection with other awards under the Company Stock Plans
outstanding as of the date of this Agreement, and in accordance
with their present terms; provided that the Compensation
Committee of the Company may exercise discretion in good faith
to make adjustments to outstanding Performance Share awards to
provide that
A-30
upon completion of the Merger, Performance Shares granted in
2006 vest either based on actual performance through the earlier
of the Closing Date or December 31, 2008, or at target,
which ever is more favorable to the grantee, to the extent the
Compensation Committee deems appropriate and in the interest of
the Company;
(iii) (A) except as set forth in
Section 4.1(a)(iii) of the Company Disclosure
Letter, amend its certificate of incorporation or by-laws
(or other comparable organizational documents), or
(B) merge or consolidate with any person other than another
Company Entity;
(iv) except as set forth in Section 4.1(a)(iv) of
the Company Disclosure Letter, sell, lease, license,
mortgage or otherwise encumber or subject to any Lien (except
Permitted Liens) or otherwise dispose of any of its properties
or assets other than dispositions of inventory or equipment in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(v) enter into commitments for capital expenditures
involving (i) in the case of capital expenditures in
respect of individual items of equipment more than
$5,000,000 million individually or (ii) more than
$50,000,000 in the aggregate, except, in each case, in
accordance with the capital expenditure budget set forth in
Section 4.1(a)(v) of the Company Disclosure Letter
or as may be otherwise be necessary for the maintenance of
existing facilities, machinery and equipment in good operating
condition and repair in the ordinary course of business, as
reflected in the capital plan of the Company previously provided
to Parent;
(vi) other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, incur any long-term indebtedness
(whether evidenced by a note or other instrument, pursuant to a
financing lease, sale-leaseback transaction, or otherwise) or
incur any short-term indebtedness other than (A) up to
$10 million of short-term indebtedness under lines of
credit, insurance arrangements or bonding agreements existing on
the date of this Agreement; (B) indebtedness incurred in
the ordinary course of business in accordance with the
agreements or instruments listed in Section 4.1(a)(vi)
of the Company Disclosure Letter, (C) as described in
Section 4.1(a)(vi) of the Company Disclosure Letter,
or (D) solely between the Company and a direct or indirect
wholly-owned Company Subsidiary or between direct or indirect
wholly-owned Company Subsidiaries;
(vii) except to the extent required under existing plans,
agreements, or arrangements as in effect on the date hereof,
(A) grant any increase in the compensation or benefits
payable or to become payable by the Company or any Company
Subsidiary to any current or former director or consultant of
the Company or any Company Subsidiary; (B) other than in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
grant any increase in the compensation or benefits payable or to
become payable by the Company or any Company Subsidiary to any
officer or employee of the Company or any Company Subsidiary;
(C) adopt, enter into, amend or otherwise increase, reprice
or accelerate the payment or vesting of the amounts, benefits or
rights payable or accrued or to become payable or accrued under
any Company Benefit Plan; (D) enter into or amend any
employment, bonus, severance, change in control, retention or
any similar agreement or any collective bargaining agreement or,
grant any severance, bonus, termination, or retention pay to any
officer, director, consultant or employee of the Company or any
Company Subsidiaries; or (E) pay or award any pension,
retirement allowance or other non-equity incentive awards, or
other employee or director benefit not required by any
outstanding Company Benefit Plan; provided however, that
notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall have the right
to continue to make such changes to its 401(k) savings
investment plan (the 401(k) Plan) applicable to all
Company Employees eligible to participate in such 401(k) Plan
for plan years that begin after 2008, as the Company determines
in its discretion, except that the benefits under the 401(k)
Plan after such changes shall not exceed the benefits under the
corresponding plan of the Parent;
(viii) change the accounting principles used by it unless
required by GAAP (or, if applicable with respect to foreign
subsidiaries, the relevant foreign generally accepted accounting
principles);
(ix) acquire by merging or consolidating with, by
purchasing any equity interest in or a material portion of the
assets of, or by any other manner, any business or any
corporation, partnership, association or other business
organization or division thereof, or otherwise acquire any
material amount of assets of any other person (other than the
purchase of assets from suppliers or vendors in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice) for
consideration in excess of $50 million in the aggregate;
A-31
(x) except consistent with past practice, make, change or
rescind any express or deemed election with respect to Taxes,
settle or compromise any claim or action relating to Taxes, or
change any of its methods of accounting or of reporting income
or deductions for Tax purposes;
(xi) satisfy any claims or liabilities other than the
satisfaction in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, in accordance with their terms or in amounts not
to exceed $5 million in 2008 and $2 million in 2009
(in each case net of insurance and indemnification payments
payable to the Company and its Subsidiaries) in the aggregate or
liabilities reflected or reserved against in, or contemplated
by, the consolidated financial statements (or the notes thereto)
of the Company included in the Recent SEC Reports or incurred in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
since the date of the Recent SEC Reports;
(xii) make any loans, advances (other than advances to
contract miners in excess of $10 million in the aggregate)
or capital contributions to, or investments in, any other person
in excess of $10 million in the aggregate, except for
loans, advances, capital contributions or investments between
any wholly owned Company Subsidiary and the Company or another
wholly owned Company Subsidiary and except for employee advances
for expenses in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice;
(xiii) other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or between the Company and any
Company Subsidiary or two Company Subsidiaries, (A) modify,
amend or terminate any Company Material Contract,
(B) waive, release, relinquish or assign any of the
Companys or any Company Subsidiarys material rights
or claims under any Company Material Contract, or
(C) cancel or forgive any indebtedness owed to the Company
or any Company Subsidiary in excess of $2 million in the
aggregate;
(xiv) except to the extent necessary to take any actions
that the Company or any third party would otherwise be permitted
to take pursuant to Section 4.2 (and in such case
only in accordance with the terms of Section 4.2),
take any action to exempt or not make subject to the provisions
of Section 203 of the DGCL or any other state takeover Law
or state Law that purports to limit or restrict business
combinations or the ability to acquire or vote shares, any
person (other than Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries), or any
action taken thereby, which person or action would have
otherwise been subject to the restrictive provisions thereof and
not exempt therefrom; or
(xv) authorize, commit or agree to take any of the
foregoing actions.
(b) Conduct of Business by
Parent. Except as (i) set forth on
Section 4.1(b) of the Parent Disclosure Letter,
(ii) otherwise required by applicable Law,
(iii) otherwise permitted or contemplated by this Agreement
or (iv) consented to in writing by the Company (such
consent not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or
conditioned), during the period from the date of this Agreement
to the Effective Time, Parent shall, and shall cause the Parent
Subsidiaries to, carry on their respective businesses in all
material respects according to their ordinary course consistent
with past practice and, to the extent consistent therewith, use
reasonable best efforts to preserve intact their current
business organizations, keep available the services of their
current officers and other key employees and preserve their
relationships with customers, suppliers, distributors and other
persons having business dealings with them. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, except as (i) set forth on
Section 4.1(b) of the Parent Disclosure Letter,
(ii) otherwise required by applicable Law,
(iii) otherwise contemplated by this Agreement or
(iv) consented to in writing by the Company (such consent
not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned), during
the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective
Time, Parent shall not and shall not permit any Parent
Subsidiary to:
(i) (A) other than dividends and distributions by a
direct or indirect wholly owned Parent Subsidiary to its parent,
and other than regular quarterly cash dividends with respect to
(a) Parent Common Stock not in excess of $0.25 per share of
Parent Common Stock and (b) the
Series A-2
Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms thereof, declare,
set aside or pay any dividends on, or make any other
distributions in respect of, any of its capital stock,
(B) split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock
or (C) except pursuant to agreements entered into with
respect to the Parent Stock Plans that are in effect as of the
close of business on the date of this Agreement, purchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of capital stock of
Parent or any of the Parent
A-32
Subsidiaries or any other securities thereof or any rights,
warrants or options to acquire any such shares or other
securities;
(ii) issue or authorize the issuance of, deliver, sell,
pledge or otherwise encumber or subject to any Lien, any shares
of its capital stock (or any other securities in respect of, in
lieu of, or in substitution for, shares of its capital stock),
any other voting securities or any securities convertible into,
or any rights, warrants or options to acquire, any such shares,
voting securities or convertible securities, other than the
issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock (A) upon the
exercise of the Parent Stock Options under the Parent Stock
Plans or in connection with other awards under the Parent Stock
Plans, (B) upon the conversion of the
Series A-2
Preferred Stock, and (C) upon exercise of the Parent Rights
under the Parent Rights Agreement, in any such case, outstanding
as of the date of this Agreement, and in accordance with their
present terms;
(iii) (A) amend its certificate of incorporation or
by-laws (or other comparable organizational documents), or
(B) merge or consolidate with any person;
(iv) other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, incur any long-term indebtedness
(whether evidenced by a note or other instrument, pursuant to a
financing lease, sale-leaseback transaction, or otherwise) or
incur short-term indebtedness other than (A) up to
$10 million of short-term indebtedness under lines of
credit existing on the date of this Agreement or
(B) indebtedness incurred pursuant to the terms of
Parents financings of the Cash Consideration as disclosed
to the Company prior to the date hereof or as would not have a
material adverse effect on the Parent or the combined company
following the Merger;
(v) change the accounting principles used by it unless
required by GAAP (or, if applicable with respect to foreign
subsidiaries, the relevant foreign generally accepted accounting
principles);
(vi) except in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice, make, change or rescind any express or
deemed election with respect to Taxes, settle or compromise any
claim or action relating to Taxes, or change any of its methods
of accounting or of reporting income or deductions for Tax
purposes;
(vii) satisfy any claims or liabilities, other than the
satisfaction, in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, in accordance with their terms or in an amount
not to exceed $5 million in the aggregate, of liabilities
reflected or reserved against in, or contemplated by, the
consolidated financial statements (or the notes thereto) of
Parent included in the Recent Parent SEC Reports or incurred in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
since the date of the Recent Parent SEC Reports;
(viii) make any loans, advances or capital contributions
to, or investments in, any other person, except for loans,
advances, capital contributions or investments between any
wholly owned Parent Subsidiary and Parent or another wholly
owned Parent Subsidiary and except for employee advances for
expenses in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice; or
(ix) authorize, commit or agree to take any of the
foregoing actions.
(c) Conduct of Business by Merger
Sub. During the period from the date of this
Agreement to the Effective Time, Merger Sub shall not engage in
any activities of any nature except as provided in or
contemplated by this Agreement.
(d) Other Actions. Except as
required by Law, the Company, Parent and Merger Sub shall not,
and shall not permit any Company Subsidiary or Parent
Subsidiary, as applicable, to, voluntarily take any action that
would reasonably be expected to result in any of the conditions
to the Merger set forth in Article VI not being
satisfied before the end of six months from the date hereof;
provided, that no party hereto shall be precluded from
asserting its right not to take certain actions as permitted by
the second sentence of Section 5.3(a).
(e) Advice of Changes. Each of the
Company, Parent and Merger Sub shall promptly advise the other
parties to this Agreement orally and in writing to the extent it
has knowledge of any change or event having, or which, insofar
as can reasonably be foreseen would reasonably be expected to
have, a material adverse effect on such party or the ability of
the conditions set forth in Article VI to be
satisfied before the end of six months from the date hereof;
provided, however, that no such notification will
affect the representations, warranties, covenants or
A-33
agreements of the parties (or remedies with respect thereto) or
the conditions to the obligations of the parties under this
Agreement and no failure to comply with this
Section 4.1(e) shall be taken into account for
purposes of determining whether the conditions to Closing have
been satisfied.
Section 4.2 No
Solicitation by the Company.
(a) Company Takeover Proposal. The
Company shall and shall cause the Company Subsidiaries and its
and their officers, directors, employees, financial advisors,
attorneys, accountants and other advisors, investment bankers,
representatives and agents retained by the Company or any of the
Company Subsidiaries, other than in the case of officers,
directors and employees, in their capacity as such,
(collectively, the Company
Representatives) to, immediately cease and cause
to be terminated immediately all existing activities,
discussions and negotiations with any parties conducted
heretofore with respect to, or that would reasonably be expected
to lead to, any Company Takeover Proposal. From and after the
date of this Agreement, the Company shall not, shall cause the
Company Subsidiaries not to, and shall direct the Company
Representatives not to, directly or indirectly,
(i) solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage (including by
way of furnishing non-public information), or knowingly
facilitate, any inquiries or the making of any proposal that
constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, a
Company Takeover Proposal, (ii) enter into any Acquisition
Agreement or enter into any agreement, arrangement or
understanding requiring it to abandon, terminate or fail to
consummate the Merger or any other transaction contemplated by
this Agreement, or (iii) initiate or participate in any way
in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or knowingly
furnish or disclose to any person (other than a party hereto)
any non-public information with respect to, or take any other
action to knowingly facilitate or knowingly further any
inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes, or
would reasonably be expected to lead to, any Company Takeover
Proposal; provided, however, that, notwithstanding
anything herein to the contrary, at any time prior to obtaining
the Company Stockholder Approval, in response to an unsolicited
bona fide written Company Takeover Proposal that the Board of
Directors of the Company determines in good faith (after
consultation with outside counsel and a financial advisor of
nationally recognized reputation) constitutes or could
reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal, and which
Company Takeover Proposal was made after the date hereof and did
not otherwise result from a breach of this
Section 4.2, the Company may, if and only to the
extent that the Board of Directors of the Company determines in
good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that
failure to do so could be reasonably likely to be a violation of
its fiduciary duties to the stockholders of the Company under
applicable Delaware Law, and subject to compliance with
Section 4.2(c), (i) furnish non-public
information with respect to the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries to the person making such Company Takeover Proposal
(and its representatives) pursuant to a customary
confidentiality agreement not less restrictive of such person
than the Confidentiality Agreement; provided,
however, that all such information has previously been
provided to Parent or is provided to Parent prior to or
substantially concurrent with the time it is provided to such
person, and (ii) participate in discussions or negotiations
with the person making such Company Takeover Proposal (and its
representatives) regarding such Company Takeover Proposal.
Without limiting the foregoing, the parties agree that any
violation of the restrictions set forth in this
Section 4.2(a) by any Company Representative (other
than in the case of officers, directors and employees, acting in
their capacity as such) shall be deemed to be a breach of this
Section 4.2(a) by the Company.
(b) Definitions. As used herein,
(i) Superior Proposal means a
bona fide written Company Takeover Proposal (except that the
references in the definition thereof to 25% shall be
replaced by 75%) that the Board of Directors of the
Company determines in its good faith judgment (after consulting
with outside counsel and a financial advisor of nationally
recognized reputation), taking into account all legal, financial
and regulatory and other aspects of the proposal (including any
break-up
fees, expense reimbursement provisions and conditions to
consummation), the likelihood and timing of required
governmental approvals and consummation and the ability of the
person making the proposal to finance and pay the contemplated
consideration, would be more favorable to the stockholders of
the Company than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
(including any adjustment to the terms and conditions proposed
by Parent in response to such Company Takeover Proposal) and
(ii) Company Takeover Proposal
means any inquiry, proposal or offer from any person
(other than Parent or its affiliates) relating to any
(A) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of a
business that constitutes 25% or more of the net revenues, net
income or the assets of the Company and the Company
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (B) direct or indirect
acquisition or purchase of 25% or more of any class of equity
securities of the Company, (C) any tender
A-34
offer or exchange offer that if consummated would result in any
person beneficially owning 25% or more of any class of equity
securities of the Company, or (D) any merger,
consolidation, business combination, asset purchase,
recapitalization or similar transaction involving the Company,
other than the transactions contemplated or permitted by this
Agreement.
(c) Actions by the
Company. Neither the Board of Directors of
the Company nor any committee thereof shall (i)
(A) withdraw (or modify in a manner adverse to Parent), or
publicly propose to withdraw (or modify in a manner adverse to
Parent), the approval, recommendation or declaration of
advisability by such Board of Directors or any such committee
thereof of this Agreement, the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement or (B) recommend, adopt or
approve, or propose publicly to recommend, adopt or approve, any
Company Takeover Proposal (any action described in this
clause (i) being referred to as a Company
Adverse Recommendation Change) or
(ii) approve or recommend, or propose publicly to approve
or recommend, or allow the Company or any of the Company
Subsidiaries to execute or enter into, any letter of intent,
memorandum of understanding, agreement in principle, merger
agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint
venture agreement, partnership agreement or other similar
agreement constituting or related to, or that is intended to or
would reasonably be expected to lead to, any Company Takeover
Proposal (other than a confidentiality agreement referred to in
Section 4.2(a)) (an Acquisition
Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if,
prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Board
of Directors of the Company determines in good faith that
failure to do so would be reasonably likely to be a violation of
its fiduciary duties to the stockholders of the Company under
applicable Delaware Law, the Company may (A) terminate this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(d)(iii) and cause
the Company to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with respect
to a Superior Proposal (which was made after the date hereof and
did not otherwise result from a breach of this
Section 4.2) or (B) make a Company Adverse
Recommendation Change, if: (i) the Company provides written
notice (a Notice of Adverse
Recommendation) advising Parent that the Board of
Directors of the Company intends to take such action and
specifying the reasons therefor, including, if applicable, the
terms and conditions of any Superior Proposal that is the basis
of the proposed action by the Board of Directors (it being
understood and agreed that any amendment to the amount of
consideration or any other material term of such Superior
Proposal shall require a new Notice of Adverse Recommendation);
(ii) for a period of three Business Days following
Parents receipt of a Notice of Adverse Recommendation the
Company negotiates with Parent in good faith to make such
adjustments to the terms and conditions of this Agreement as
would enable the Company to proceed with its recommendation of
this Agreement and the Merger and not make such Company Adverse
Recommendation Change (it being understood that such negotiation
need not be exclusive); and (iii) if applicable, at the end
of such three Business Day period, the Board of Directors of the
Company continues to believe that the Company Takeover Proposal,
if any, constitutes a Superior Proposal (after taking into
account such adjustments to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement). No Company Adverse Recommendation Change shall
change the approval of the Board of Directors of the Company for
purposes of causing any state takeover Law (including
Section 203 of the DGCL) or other state Law to be
inapplicable to the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
(d) Notice of Company Takeover
Proposal. From and after the date of this
Agreement, the Company shall promptly (but in any event within
one calendar day) notify Parent in the event that the Company
receives, directly or indirectly, (i) any Company Takeover
Proposal; (ii) any request for non-public information
relating to any of the Company Entities by any person that
informs the Company or any Company Representative that such
person is considering making, or has made, a Company Takeover
Proposal, or (iii) any request for discussions or
negotiations relating to a possible Company Takeover Proposal.
Such notice shall be made orally and confirmed in writing, and
shall indicate the material terms and conditions thereof and the
identity of the other party or parties involved and promptly
furnish to Parent and Merger Sub a copy of any such written
inquiry, request or proposal. The Company agrees that it shall
keep Parent reasonably informed, in all material respects, of
the status and details (including amendments or proposed
amendments) of any such request, Company Takeover Proposal or
inquiry and keep Parent reasonably informed, in all material
respects, as to the details of any information requested of or
provided by the Company and as to the details of discussions or
negotiations with respect to any such request, Company Takeover
Proposal or inquiry, including by providing a copy of all
material documentation of the Company Takeover Proposal.
A-35
(e) Rule 14e-2(a),
Rule 14d-9
and Other Applicable Law. Nothing contained
in this Section 4.2 shall prohibit the Company from
(i) taking and disclosing to its stockholders a position
contemplated by
Rule 14e-2(a)
or
Rule 14d-9
promulgated under the Exchange Act or (ii) making any
disclosure to the stockholders of the Company if, in the good
faith judgment of the Board of Directors (after consultation
with outside counsel), failure to make such disclosure would
reasonably be expected to violate its or the Companys
obligations under applicable Law; provided,
however, that the Board of Directors of the Company may
not effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change, unless
permitted to do so by Section 4.2(c),
provided, further, that notwithstanding anything
herein to the contrary, any stop, look and listen
disclosure in and of itself shall not be considered a Company
Adverse Recommendation Change.
(f) Return or Destruction of Confidential
Information. The Company agrees that
immediately following the execution of this Agreement it shall
request each person which has heretofore executed a
confidentiality agreement in connection with such persons
consideration of acquiring the Company to return or destroy all
confidential information heretofore furnished to such person by
or on the Companys behalf.
ARTICLE V
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
Section 5.1 Preparation
of the
Form S-4
and the Joint Proxy Statement; Stockholders
Meetings.
(a) Form S-4
Proxy Statement. As soon as practicable
following the date of this Agreement, the Company and Parent
shall prepare and file with the SEC the Joint Proxy Statement
and Parent shall prepare and file with the SEC the
Form S-4,
in which the Joint Proxy Statement will be included as a
prospectus. Each of the Company and Parent shall use reasonable
best efforts to have the
Form S-4
declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as
practicable after such filing. The Company shall use reasonable
best efforts to cause the Joint Proxy Statement to be mailed to
the Companys stockholders, and Parent shall use reasonable
best efforts to cause the Joint Proxy Statement to be mailed to
Parents stockholders, in each case as promptly as
practicable after the
Form S-4
is declared effective under the Securities Act. Parent shall
also take any action (other than qualifying to do business in
any jurisdiction in which it is not now so qualified or to file
a general consent to service of process) required to be taken
under any applicable state securities Laws in connection with
the issuance of Parent Common Stock in the Merger and the
Company shall furnish all information concerning the Company and
the holders of the Company Common Stock as Parent may reasonably
request in connection with any such action. No filing of, or
amendment or supplement to, the
Form S-4
will be made by Parent, and no filing of, or amendment or
supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement will be made by the
Company or Parent, in each case, without providing the other
party and its respective counsel the reasonable opportunity to
review and comment thereon and giving due consideration to such
comments. The parties shall notify each other promptly of the
receipt of any comments from the SEC or its staff and any
request by the SEC or its staff for amendments or supplements to
the Joint Proxy Statement or the
Form S-4
or for additional information and shall supply each other with
copies of all correspondence between such party or any of its
representatives, on the one hand, and the SEC or its staff on
the other hand, with respect to the Joint Proxy Statement, the
Form S-4
or the Merger. Parent will advise the Company, promptly after it
receives notice thereof, of the time when the
Form S-4
has become effective, the issuance of any stop order or the
suspension of the qualification of the Parent Common Stock
issuable in connection with the Merger for offering or sale in
any jurisdiction. If at any time prior to the Effective Time any
information relating to the Company or Parent, or any of their
respective affiliates, officers or directors, should be
discovered by the Company or Parent which should be set forth in
an amendment or supplement to the
Form S-4
or the Joint Proxy Statement, so that any of such documents
would not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to
state any material fact necessary to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading, the party which discovers such information
shall promptly notify the other parties hereto and an
appropriate amendment or supplement describing such information
must be promptly filed with the SEC and, to the extent required
by Law, disseminated to the stockholders of each of the Company
and Parent.
A-36
(b) Stockholders Meetings.
(i) The Company shall, as soon as practicable following the
date of this Agreement, duly call, give notice of, convene and
hold a meeting of its stockholders (the Company
Stockholders Meeting) in accordance with
applicable Law, the Company Charter and by-laws for the purpose
of obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval. Subject to
Section 4.2(c), the Company shall (A) through the
Board of Directors of the Company, recommend to its stockholders
the approval and adoption of this Agreement, the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated hereby and include in the Joint
Proxy Statement such recommendation and (B) use its
reasonable best efforts to solicit and obtain such approval and
adoption. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
subject to its rights under Section 4.2(c), the
Company agrees that its obligations pursuant to the first
sentence of this Section 5.1(b)(i) shall not be
affected by any Company Adverse Recommendation Change or the
commencement, public proposal, public disclosure or
communication to the Company or its stockholders of any Company
Takeover Proposal. The Company shall provide Parent with the
Companys stockholder list as and when requested by Parent,
including at any time and from time to time following a Company
Adverse Recommendation Change.
(ii) Parent shall, as soon as practicable following the
date of this Agreement, duly call, give notice of, convene and
hold a meeting of its stockholders (the Parent
Stockholders Meeting) in accordance with
applicable Law, Parents Amended Articles of Incorporation
and Regulations for the purpose of obtaining the Parent
Stockholder Approval. Parent shall (A) through the Board of
Directors of Parent, recommend to its stockholders the approval
of the issuance of Parent Common Stock pursuant to this
Agreement and include in the Joint Proxy Statement such
recommendation, (B) use its reasonable best efforts to
solicit and obtain such approval and (C) not withdraw or
modify, or publicly propose to withdraw or modify, the
recommendation contemplated by clause (A) or recommend,
adopt or approve or publicly propose to recommend, adopt or
approve any Parent Alternative Proposal (any such action in this
clause (C) being referred to as a Parent
Adverse Recommendation Change; provided,
however, that, notwithstanding the foregoing, if, prior
to obtaining the Parent Stockholder Approval, the Board of
Directors of Parent determines in good faith that failure do so
would reasonably be reasonably likely to be a violation of its
fiduciary duties to the Stockholders of Parent under the Ohio
General Corporation Law, Parent may make a Parent Adverse
Recommendation Change. Parent agrees that its obligations
pursuant to the first sentence of this Section 5.1(b)(ii)
shall not be affected by any Parent Adverse Recommendation
Change. Parent shall provide the Company with Parents
stockholder list as and when requested by the Company, including
at any time and from time to time following a Parent Adverse
Recommendation Change. Parent may not make any Parent Adverse
Recommendation Change unless: (i) Parent provides the
Company three Business Days advance written notice advising the
Company that the Board of Directors of Parent intends to take
such action and specifying the reasons therefor, including, if
applicable, the material terms of any Parent Alternative
Proposal that is the basis of the proposed action by the Board
of Directors of Parent and during such three Business Day
period, Parent negotiates with the Company in good faith in
order to enable Parent to proceed with its recommendation of
this Agreement and the Merger and not make such Parent Adverse
Recommendation Change.
(iii) Each of Parent and the Company agrees to use its
reasonable best efforts to hold the Parent Stockholders Meeting
and the Company Stockholders Meeting at the same time on the
same day.
Section 5.2 Access
to Information; Confidentiality.
(a) To the extent permitted by applicable Law and subject
to the agreement, dated June 21, 2007, between the Company
and Parent (the Confidentiality
Agreement), the Company shall, and shall cause the
Company Subsidiaries to, afford to the Parent Representatives
reasonable access, during normal business hours, to all of the
Company Entities properties, books, contracts,
commitments, personnel and records and all other information
concerning their business, properties and personnel as Parent or
Merger Sub may reasonably request. Parent and Merger Sub shall
hold, and shall cause their respective affiliates and the Parent
Representatives to hold, any nonpublic information in accordance
with the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary
shall be obligated to provide any such access or information to
the extent that doing so (x) may cause a waiver of an
attorney-client privilege or loss of attorney work product
protection, (y) would violate a confidentiality obligation
to any person or (z) would be materially disruptive
A-37
to the business or operations of the Company or its
Subsidiaries, provided, that the Company and Parent shall
use commercially reasonable efforts to provide such access or
information in a manner that avoids or removes the impediments
described in clauses (x), (y) and (z).
(b) To the extent permitted by applicable Law and subject
to the Confidentiality Agreement, Parent shall, and shall cause
the Parent Subsidiaries to, afford to the Company
Representatives reasonable access, during normal business hours,
to all of the Parent Entities properties, books,
contracts, commitments, personnel and records and all other
information concerning their business, properties and personnel
as the Company may reasonably request. The Company shall hold,
and shall cause their respective affiliates and the Parent
Representatives to hold, any nonpublic information in accordance
with the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary shall be
obligated to provide any such access or information to the
extent that doing so (x) may cause a waiver of an
attorney-client privilege or loss of attorney work product
protection, (y) would violate a confidentiality obligation
to any person or (z) would be materially disruptive to the
business or operations of Parent, provided, that Parent
and the Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to
provide such access or information in a manner that avoids or
removes the impediments described in clauses (x), (y) and
(z).
Section 5.3 Reasonable
Best Efforts; Cooperation.
(a) Reasonable Best Efforts. Upon
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement, including Section 5.3(d), each of the
parties agrees to use reasonable best efforts to take, or cause
to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to
assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things
necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make effective,
in the most expeditious manner practicable, the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and to obtain
satisfaction of the conditions precedent to the Merger,
including (i) the obtaining of all necessary actions or
nonactions, waivers, clearances, consents and approvals from
Governmental Entities and the making of all necessary
registrations and filings and the taking of all steps as may be
necessary to obtain an approval or waiver from, or to avoid an
action or proceeding by, any Governmental Entity, (ii) the
obtaining of all necessary consents, approvals or waivers from
third parties, (iii) preventing the entry, enactment or
promulgation of any injunction or order or Law that could
materially and adversely affect the ability of the parties
hereto to consummate the transactions under this Agreement,
(iv) seeking the lifting or rescission of any injunction or
order or Law that could materially and adversely affect the
ability of the parties hereto to consummate the transactions
under this Agreement, (v) cooperating to defend against any
proceeding or investigation relating to this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby and to cooperate to defend
against it and respond thereto, (vi) the execution and
delivery of any additional instruments necessary to consummate
the transactions contemplated by, and to fully carry out the
purposes of, this Agreement, (vii) using commercially
reasonable efforts to arrange for the Companys independent
accountants to provide such comfort letters, consents and other
services that are reasonably required in connection with
Parents financings of the Cash Consideration and
(viii) assisting in the marketing and sale or any other
syndication of any such financings by making appropriate
officers of the Company available for due diligence meetings and
for participation in the road show and meetings with prospective
participants in such financings upon reasonable notice and at
reasonable times, provided, that in the case of
clauses (vii) and (viii), Parent shall promptly reimburse
the Company for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by, and
otherwise indemnify and hold harmless, the Company, its
Affiliates and its and their respective officers, directors,
accountants and representatives from and against all
liabilities, relating to such actions other than those arising
from such persons willful misconduct or gross negligence.
For purposes of this Agreement, reasonable best efforts shall
not require the parties to (i) sell, hold separate or
otherwise dispose of or conduct the business of the Company,
Parent
and/or any
of their respective affiliates in a manner which would resolve
such objections or suits, (ii) agree to sell, hold separate
or otherwise dispose of or conduct the business of the Company,
Parent
and/or any
of their respective affiliates in a manner which would resolve
such objections or suits, (iii) permit the sale, holding
separate or other disposition of, any of the assets of the
Company, Parent
and/or any
of their respective affiliates or the execution of any agreement
or order to do so, and (iv) conduct the business of the
Company, Parent
and/or any
of their respective affiliates in a manner which would resolve
such objections or suits, except to the extent any such action
described in clauses (i) through (iv) would not
reasonably be expected to materially impair the benefits each of
Parent and the Company reasonably expects to be derived from the
combination of Parent and the Company through the Merger. In
furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing,
A-38
each of Parent and the Company agrees to make an appropriate
filing under HSR with respect to the transactions contemplated
hereby as promptly as practicable and in any event within 20
Business Days following the date hereof and to supply as
promptly as practicable any additional information and
documentary material that may be requested pursuant to the HSR
Act and to take all other actions necessary to cause the
expiration or termination of the applicable waiting periods
under the HSR Act as soon as practicable.
(b) No Takeover Statutes Apply. In
connection with and without limiting the foregoing, the Company,
Parent and Merger Sub shall (i) take all action necessary
to ensure that no Takeover Statute or similar Law is or becomes
applicable to the Merger, this Agreement or any of the other
transactions contemplated hereby and (ii) if any Takeover
Statute or similar Law becomes applicable to the Merger, this
Agreement or any of the other transactions contemplated hereby,
take all action necessary to ensure that the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated hereby may be consummated as
promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated by this
Agreement and otherwise to minimize the effect of such Law on
the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
(c) Opinions Regarding Tax
Treatment. Parent and the Company shall
cooperate with each other in obtaining the opinions of Jones
Day, counsel to Parent, for the benefit of Parent, and Cleary
Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, counsel to the Company,
for the benefit of the Companys stockholders,
respectively, dated as of the Closing Date, to the effect that
the Merger will constitute a reorganization within the meaning
of Section 368(a) of the Code. In connection therewith,
each of Parent and the Company shall deliver to Jones Day and
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP customary
representation letters in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to such counsel, and at such time or times that may
be reasonably requested by such counsel (the representation
letters referred to in this sentence are collectively referred
to as the Tax Certificates). None of
Parent, Merger Sub or the Company shall take or cause to be
taken any action which would cause to be untrue (or fail to take
or cause not to be taken any action which would cause to be
untrue) any of such certificates and representations.
(d) Information Cooperation. In
connection with the efforts referenced in
Section 5.3(a) to obtain all requisite approvals and
authorizations for the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement under the HSR Act, and to obtain all such approvals
and authorizations under any other applicable Antitrust Law,
each of Parent and the Company shall use its reasonable best
efforts to (i) cooperate in all respects with each other in
connection with any filing or submission and in connection with
any investigation or other inquiry, including any proceeding
initiated by a private party, (ii) keep the other party
informed in all material respects of any material communication
(and if in writing, provide a copy of such communication)
received by such party from, or given by such party to, the
Federal Trade Commission, the Antitrust Division of the
Department of Justice or any other Governmental Entity and of
any material communication received or given in connection with
any proceeding by a private party, in each case regarding any of
the transactions contemplated hereby, (iii) permit the
other party to review any material communication given by it to,
and consult with each other in advance of any meeting or
conference with, any such Governmental Entity or in connection
with any proceeding by a private party, (iv) consult and
cooperate with the other party and consider in good faith the
views of the other party in connection with any analyses,
appearances, presentations, memoranda, briefs, arguments,
opinions or proposals made or submitted by or on behalf of the
Company, Parent or any of their respective affiliates to any
such Governmental Entity or private party and (v) not
participate in any substantive meeting or have any substantive
communication with any Governmental Entity unless it has given
the other parties a reasonable opportunity to consult with it in
advance and, to the extent permitted by such Governmental
Entity, gives the other the opportunity to attend and
participate therein. Subject to the Confidentiality Agreement
and any attorney-client, work product or other privilege, each
of the parties hereto will coordinate and cooperate fully with
the other parties hereto in exchanging such information and
providing such assistance as such other parties may reasonably
request in connection with the foregoing and in seeking early
termination of any applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act.
Any competitively sensitive information that is disclosed
pursuant to this Section 5.3(d) will be limited to
each of Parents and the Companys respective counsel
pursuant to a separate customary confidentiality agreement. For
purposes of this Agreement, Antitrust Law means the
Sherman Act, as amended, the Clayton Act, as amended, the HSR
Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, and all other
Laws that are designed or intended to prohibit, restrict or
regulate actions having the purpose or effect of monopolization
or restraint of trade or lessening of competition through merger
or acquisition.
A-39
(e) In furtherance and not in limitation of the covenants
of the parties contained in this Section 5.3, if any
objections are asserted with respect to the transactions
contemplated hereby under any Antitrust Law or if any suit is
instituted or threatened to be instituted by any Governmental
Entity or any private party challenging any of the transactions
contemplated hereby as violative of any Law or which would
otherwise prevent, impede or delay the consummation of the
Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby, each of
Parent, Merger Sub and the Company shall use reasonable best
efforts to resolve any such objections or suits so as to permit
the consummation of the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement as promptly as reasonably
practicable. Neither the Company nor Parent shall, and they
shall cause their respective Subsidiaries not to, acquire or
agree to acquire any assets, business, securities, person or
subdivision thereof, if the entering into of a definitive
agreement relating to or the consummation of such acquisition,
could reasonably be expected to materially delay or materially
increase the risk of not obtaining the applicable action,
nonaction, waiver, clearance, consent or approval under the
Antitrust Laws or any other competition, merger control,
antitrust or similar Laws.
(f) Each of Parent and Merger Sub acknowledge and agree
that their obligations to consummate the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby are not conditioned or
contingent upon receipt of any financing.
(g) The parties shall, and shall cause their respective
advisors, to use their reasonable best efforts jointly
(i) to compile, by no later than the seventh calendar day
after the date hereof, a definitive list of all consents,
approvals and filings under any applicable Laws governing
antitrust or merger control matters in jurisdictions outside the
United States that, if not obtained or made, would prohibit the
consummation of the Merger and (ii) to expand, as promptly
as practicable, such list after such seventh calendar day to the
extent that, subsequent to such seventh day, there are any
changes in applicable Law or the application or interpretation
thereof (including the adoption of new applicable Laws) that
result in the existence of new consents, approvals and filings
under any applicable Laws governing antitrust or merger control
matters in jurisdictions outside the United States that, if not
obtained or made, would prohibit the consummation of the Merger .
Section 5.4 Stock
Options; Restricted Stock and Performance Shares.
(a) Assumption of Company Stock
Options. At the Effective Time, (i) each
outstanding Company Stock Option, whether vested or unvested
immediately prior to the Effective Time, to purchase shares of
Company Common Stock, and (ii) each of the Company Stock
Plans and all agreements thereunder, shall be assumed by Parent.
To the extent provided under the terms of the Company Stock
Plans, all such outstanding options shall accelerate and become
immediately exercisable in connection with the Merger in
accordance with their existing terms. Except for the
acceleration of the Company Stock Options in accordance with the
terms of the Company Stock Plans and any agreements thereunder,
prior to or at the Effective Time, each Company Stock Option so
assumed by Parent under this Agreement (an Adjusted
Option) shall continue to have, and be subject to,
substantially the same terms and conditions as were applicable
under the Company Stock Plans and the documents governing the
Company Stock Options immediately before the Effective Time,
except that (x) each Company Stock Option will be
exercisable for that number of whole shares of Parent Common
Stock equal to the product of the number of shares of Company
Common Stock that were issuable upon exercise of such option
immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the sum of
(1) the Stock Consideration plus (2) the Cash
Consideration divided by the Closing Price and (y) the per
share exercise price for the shares of Parent Common Stock
issuable upon exercise of such Company Stock Option will be
equal to the quotient determined by dividing the per share
exercise price of the Company Stock Option by the sum of
(1) the Stock Consideration plus (2) the Cash
Consideration divided by the Closing Price. The date of grant of
each Adjusted Option will be the date on which the corresponding
Company Stock Option was granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the adjustment described in this Section 5.4(a) shall be
made in a manner consistent with Section 409A of the Code
and, with respect to each Company Stock Option that is an
incentive stock option (within the meaning of
Section 422(b) of the Code), no adjustment will be made
that would be a modification (within the meaning of
Section 424(h) of the Code) to such option.
(b) Stock Plans. The Company and
Parent agree that each of the Company Stock Plans and all
relevant Parent Stock Plans will be amended, to the extent
necessary, to reflect the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, including conversion of shares of the Company Common
Stock held or to be awarded or paid pursuant to such benefit
plans, programs or arrangements into shares of Parent Common
Stock on a basis consistent with the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement. The Company and Parent agree to submit the
amendments to the
A-40
Parent Stock Plans or the Company Stock Plans to their
respective stockholders if such submission is determined to be
necessary by counsel to the Company or Parent after consultation
with one another; provided, however, that such
approval will not be a condition to the consummation of the
Merger.
(c) Reservation of Shares. Parent
will (i) reserve for issuance the number of shares of
Parent Common Stock that will become subject to the benefit
plans, programs and arrangements referred to in this
Section 5.4 and (ii) issue or cause to be
issued the appropriate number of shares of Parent Common Stock,
pursuant to applicable plans, programs and arrangements, upon
the exercise or maturation of rights existing thereunder on the
Effective Time or thereafter granted or awarded. As soon as
practicable after the Effective Time, Parent will prepare and
file with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-8
(or other appropriate form) registering a number of shares of
Parent Common Stock necessary to fulfill Parents
obligations under this Section 5.4. Such
registration statement will be kept effective (and the current
status of the prospectus required thereby will be maintained)
for at least as long as Adjusted Options remain outstanding.
(d) Notices. As soon as
practicable after the Effective Time, Parent will deliver to the
holders of the Company Stock Options appropriate notices setting
forth such holders rights pursuant to the Company Stock
Plans and the agreements evidencing the grants of such Company
Stock Options and that such Company Stock Options and the
related agreements will be assumed by Parent and will continue
in effect on the same terms and conditions (subject to the
adjustment required by this Section 5.4 after giving
effect to the Merger).
(e) Restricted Shares. At the
Effective Time, each outstanding unvested share of restricted
Company Common Stock issued under a Company Stock Plan (each, a
Restricted Share) shall become vested
and no longer subject to restrictions, and as a result shall be
treated in the Merger as set forth in Section 2.1.
(f) Performance Shares. At the
Effective Time, each outstanding performance share granted under
the Company Stock Plans (each, a Performance
Share) shall vest according to the terms of the
applicable Performance Share agreement, and the holder of each
Performance Share agreement shall be entitled to receive an
amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the sum of
(A) the Cash Consideration plus (B) the product of the
Stock Consideration multiplied by the Closing Price, multiplied
by (ii) the number of shares of Company Common Stock that
would be issuable under such Performance Share agreement.
(g) Withholding. All amounts
payable pursuant to this Section 5.4 shall be paid
net of any required withholding of federal, state, local or
foreign taxes, unless withholding is effected otherwise with the
consent of the recipient, and shall be paid without interest.
Section 5.5 Indemnification.
(a) Rights Assumed by Surviving
Corporation. Parent agrees that all rights to
indemnification and exculpation from liabilities for acts or
omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time (including
any matters arising in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement) now existing in favor of the
current or former directors, officers or employees of the
Company and the Company Subsidiaries as provided in their
respective certificates of incorporation, by-laws (or comparable
organizational documents) or in any agreement between the
Company or its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any current or
former director, officer or employee of the Company or its
Subsidiaries, on the other hand, will be assumed by the
Surviving Corporation without further action, as of the
Effective Time, and will survive the Merger and will continue in
full force and effect in accordance with their terms.
(b) Successors and Assigns of Surviving
Corporation. In the event that the Surviving
Corporation or any of its successors or assigns
(i) consolidates with or merges into any other person and
is not the continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such
consolidation or merger or (ii) transfers or conveys all or
substantially all of its properties and assets to any person,
then, and in each such case, proper provision will be made so
that the successors and assigns of the Surviving Corporation
assume the obligations set forth in this Section 5.5.
(c) Continuing Coverage. From the
Effective Time and for a period of six years thereafter, the
Surviving Corporation shall maintain in effect directors
and officers liability insurance covering acts or
omissions occurring prior to the Effective Time with respect to
those persons who are currently covered by the Companys
directors and officers liability insurance policy (a
copy of which has been heretofore delivered to Parent) (the
Indemnified
A-41
Parties) on terms with respect to such
coverage and amount no less favorable than those of such current
insurance coverage; provided, however, that in no
event will Parent or the Surviving Corporation be required to
expend in any one year an amount in excess of 300% of the annual
premiums currently paid by the Company for such insurance; and
provided, further, that, if the annual premiums of
such insurance coverage exceed such amount, Parent will be
obligated to obtain a policy with the greatest coverage
available for a cost not exceeding such amount; and
provided, further, however, that at
Parents option in lieu of the foregoing insurance
coverage, the Surviving Corporation or Parent may purchase
six-year tail insurance coverage in favor of the
Indemnified Parties that provides coverage identical in all
material respects to the coverage described above.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if two Business
Days prior to the Effective Time, Parent has not completed the
actions contemplated by the last proviso of the preceding
sentence, the Company may, with prior notice to Parent, purchase
six-year tail insurance coverage in favor of the
Indemnified Parties that provides coverage identical in all
material respects to the coverage described above, provided that
the Company does not pay in excess of $1,500,000.
(d) Intended Beneficiaries. The
provisions of this Section 5.5 are (i) intended
to be for the benefit of, and will be enforceable by, each
Indemnified Party, his or her heirs and his or her
representatives and in the case of Section 5.5(a),
current and former directors, officers and employees of the
Company and the Company Subsidiaries and (ii) in addition
to, and not in substitution for, any other rights to
indemnification or contribution that any such person may have by
contract or otherwise.
Section 5.6 Public
Announcements. Parent and the Company shall
consult with each other before holding any press conferences,
analysts calls or other meetings or discussions and before
issuing any press release or other public announcements with
respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including the Merger. The parties will provide each other the
opportunity to review and comment upon any press release or
other public announcement or statement with respect to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the
Merger, and shall not issue any such press release or other
public announcement or statement prior to such consultation,
except as may be required by applicable Law, court process or by
obligations pursuant to any listing agreement with any national
securities exchange. The parties agree that the initial press
release or releases to be issued with respect to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be mutually
agreed upon prior to the issuance thereof.
Section 5.7 NYSE
Listing. Parent shall use its reasonable best
efforts to cause the Parent Common Stock issuable either to the
Companys stockholders as contemplated by this Agreement or
pursuant to Section 5.4, to be approved for listing
on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance, as promptly
as practicable after the date of this Agreement, and in any
event prior to the Closing Date.
Section 5.8 Stockholder
Litigation. The parties to this Agreement
shall cooperate and consult with one another, to the fullest
extent possible, in connection with any stockholder litigation
against any of them or any of their respective directors or
officers with respect to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. In furtherance of and without in any way limiting the
foregoing, each of the parties shall use its respective
reasonable best efforts to prevail in such litigation so as to
permit the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement in the manner contemplated by this Agreement, as
promptly as reasonably practicable. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Company agrees that it will not compromise or
settle any litigation commenced against it or its directors or
officers relating to this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby (including the Merger) without Parents
prior written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld.
Section 5.9 Tax
Treatment. Each of Parent, Merger Sub and the
Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause the
Merger to qualify as a reorganization under the provisions of
Section 368(a) of the Code and to obtain the opinions of
counsel referred to in Sections 6.2(d) and
6.3(d), including forbearing from taking any action that
would cause the Merger not to qualify as a reorganization under
the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Code.
Section 5.10 Standstill
Agreements; Confidentiality
Agreements. During the period from the date
of this Agreement through the Effective Time, neither Parent nor
the Company shall terminate, amend, modify or waive any
provision of any confidentiality or standstill agreement to
which Parent or any of the Parent Subsidiaries, or the Company
or any of the Company Subsidiaries, as applicable, is a party,
other than (a) the Confidentiality Agreement, pursuant to
its terms or by written agreement of the parties thereto,
(b) confidentiality agreements under which Parent or the
Company, as applicable, does not provide any confidential
information to third parties, (c) standstill agreements
that do not relate to the equity securities of Parent or any of
the Parent Subsidiaries, or the
A-42
Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries, or (d) to the
extent necessary to take any actions that the Company or any
third party would otherwise be permitted to take pursuant to
Section 4.2 (and in such case only in accordance
with the terms of Section 4.2). During such period,
except to the extent any such agreement is terminated, amended,
modified or any provision thereof waived in accordance with the
preceding sentence, Parent and the Company shall enforce, to the
fullest extent permitted under applicable Law, the provisions of
any such agreement, including by obtaining injunctions to
prevent any breaches of such agreements and by enforcing
specifically the terms and provisions thereof in any court of
competent jurisdiction.
Section 5.11 Section 16(b). Parent
and the Company shall take all steps reasonably necessary to
cause the transactions contemplated hereby and any other
dispositions of equity securities of the Company (including
derivative securities) or acquisitions of Parent equity
securities (including derivative securities) in connection with
this Agreement by each individual who is a director or officer
of the Company to be exempt under
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act.
Section 5.12 Employee
Benefit Matters.
(a) Company Obligations. The
Company shall adopt such amendments to the Company Benefit Plans
as requested by Parent and as may be necessary to ensure that
Company Benefit Plans cover only employees and former employees
(and their dependents and beneficiaries) of the Company and the
Company Subsidiaries following the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. With respect to any
Company Common Stock held by any Company Benefit Plan as of the
date of this Agreement or thereafter, the Company shall take all
actions necessary or appropriate (including such actions as are
reasonably requested by Parent) to ensure that all participant
voting procedures contained in the Company Benefit Plans
relating to such shares, and all applicable provisions of ERISA,
are complied with in full.
(b) Parent Obligations. For the
period commencing at the Effective Time and ending on the second
anniversary thereof, the Parent shall cause to be maintained on
behalf of employees of the Company at the Effective Time other
than individuals covered by a collective bargaining agreement
(the Company Employees), considered as
a group, compensation opportunities and employee benefits that
are substantially comparable, in the aggregate, to the
compensation opportunities and employee benefits provided by the
Company or its Subsidiaries, as applicable.
(c) Credit for Service of Company
Employees. If Company Employees are included
in any benefit plan maintained by Parent or any Parent
Subsidiary (a Parent
Plan) following the Effective Time, such
Company Employees shall receive credit for service with the
Company and the Company Subsidiaries and their predecessors
prior to the Effective Time to the same extent such service was
counted under similar Company Benefit Plans for purposes of
eligibility, vesting, level of benefits and benefit accrual
under such Parent Plan, or if there is no such similar Company
Benefit Plan, to the same extent such service was recognized
under the Alpha Natural Resources, LLC and Subsidiaries Retiree
Medical Benefit Plan (Retiree Plan),
including, without limitation, the Legacy Company service and
Acquired Company service, as defined in the Retiree Plan
immediately prior to the Effective Time, provided that
(i) such recognition of service shall not operate to
duplicate any benefits payable to the Company Employee with
respect to the same period of service, (ii) service of
Company Employees subject to collective bargaining agreements or
obligations shall be determined under such collective bargaining
agreements or obligations, (iii) in no event will such
recognition of service for purposes of benefit levels or benefit
accrual under a defined benefit pension plan of Parent or any
Parent Subsidiary apply for any purpose other than determining
the annual rate of benefit accrual under a cash balance pension
plan formula for a period after the date that any such Company
Employee first actually becomes eligible to participate therein,
and (iv) in no event will such recognition of service be
taken into account for purposes of determining a Company
Employees eligibility to participate in a retiree medical
benefit plan maintained by Parent or any Parent Subsidiary. If
Company Employees or their dependents are included in any
medical, dental or health plan of Parent or any of its
Affiliates (a Successor Plan) other
than the plan or plans in which they participated immediately
prior to the Effective Time (a Prior
Plan), any such Successor Plan shall not include
any restrictions or limitations with respect to pre-existing
condition exclusions or any actively-at-work requirements
(except to the extent such exclusions were applicable under any
similar Prior Plan at the Effective Time) and any eligible
expenses incurred by any Company Employee and his or her covered
dependents during the portion of the plan year of such Prior
Plan ending on the date such Company
A-43
Employees participation in such Successor Plan begins
shall be taken into account under such Successor Plan for
purposes of satisfying all deductible, coinsurance and maximum
out-of-pocket requirements applicable to such Company Employee
and his or her covered dependents for the applicable plan year
as if such amounts had been paid in accordance with such
Successor Plan; provided however, that the rights
under a Successor Plan of any Company Employee subject to
collective bargaining agreements or obligations shall be
determined pursuant to such collective bargaining agreements or
obligations.
(d) No Third-Party
Beneficiaries. Nothing in this
Section 5.12 shall (i) confer any rights upon
any person, including any Company Employee or former employees
of the Company, other than the parties hereto and their
respective successors and permitted assigns,
(ii) constitute or create an employment agreement, or
(iii) constitute or be treated as the amendment,
modification or adoption of any employee benefit plan of Parent,
the Company of any of their Affiliates.
Section 5.13 Actions
with Respect to Existing
Debt. (a) Provided that Parent complies
with its obligations under this Section 5.13, the
Company will, upon receiving any written request by Parent to do
so, use its reasonable best efforts to commence as soon as
reasonably practicable in light of Section 5.13(c) a tender
offer (the Notes Tender Offer) for all
outstanding 2.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2012 of the
Company (the Notes). As part of any
Notes Tender Offer, the Company will use its reasonable best
efforts to solicit the consent of the holders of the Notes (the
Notes Consents) to amend, eliminate or
waive certain sections (as may be proposed by Parent) of the
Indenture, dated as of April 7, 2008, between the Company,
as issuer, and Union Bank of California, National Association,
as trustee (the Indenture). The
aggregate consideration payable to each holder of Notes pursuant
to the Notes Tender Offer will be an amount in cash established
and funded by Parent. The Notes Tender Offer will be made
pursuant to an Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation
Statement prepared by Parent in connection with the Notes Tender
Offer in a form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the
Company; provided, that any such Notes Tender
Offer will be subject to the conditions set forth in
Section 5.13(b) (as amended from time to time, the
Notes Offer to Purchase).
(b) The Companys and the Surviving Corporations
obligation to accept for payment and pay for the Notes tendered
pursuant to the Notes Tender Offer will be subject to the
conditions that (i) the Merger will have occurred (or
Parent and the Company will be satisfied that it will occur
substantially concurrently with such acceptance and payment) and
(ii) such other conditions as may be proposed by Parent,
including such other conditions as are customary for
transactions similar to the Notes Tender Offer. Subject to the
terms and conditions of the Notes Tender Offer, substantially
concurrently with the Closing, Parent agrees to cause the
Surviving Corporation to accept for payment and thereafter to
promptly pay for all Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, none of the
Notes shall be required to be purchased nor shall any payments
be required to be made by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
in connection with the Notes Tender Offer prior to the Effective
Time. The Company will waive any of the conditions to the Notes
Tender Offer as may be requested by Parent (other than the
conditions that the Notes Tender Offer is conditioned on the
Merger as provided in clause (i) above and that there shall
be no Law, injunction or other legal restraint prohibiting
consummation of the Notes Tender Offer), so long as such waivers
would not cause the Notes Tender Offer to violate the Exchange
Act, the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the
TIA), or any other applicable Law, and
will not, without the prior written consent of Parent, waive any
condition to the Notes Tender Offer or make any change,
amendment or modification to the terms and conditions of the
Notes Tender Offer (including any extension thereof) other than
as agreed between Parent and the Company or as required to
comply with applicable Law.
(c) After having submitted a request to the Company
pursuant to Section 5.13(a), Parent will prepare, as
promptly as practicable, the Notes Offer to Purchase, together
with any required related letters of transmittal and similar
ancillary agreements and other necessary and appropriate
documents (such documents, together with all supplements and
amendments thereto, being referred to herein collectively as the
Notes Tender Offer Documents),
relating to the Notes Tender Offer and will use its reasonable
best efforts to cause to be disseminated to the record holders
of the Notes and, to the extent known to the Company, the
beneficial owners of the Notes (collectively, the
Noteholders) the Notes Tender Offer
Documents; provided, however, that, upon
reasonable request, Parent will provide the Company with any
information for inclusion in the Notes Tender Offer Documents
that may be required under applicable Law and all mailings to
the Noteholders in connection with the Notes Tender Offer shall
be subject to the prior review of, and comment by, the Company
and shall be reasonably acceptable to it
A-44
before dissemination. The Company shall reasonably cooperate
with Parent in the preparation of the Notes Tender Offer
Documents. If at any time prior to the acceptance of the Notes
pursuant to the Notes Tender Offer any event should occur or any
information should be discovered by the Company or Parent which
should be set forth in an amendment or supplement to the Notes
Tender Offer Documents, so that the Notes Tender Offer Documents
shall not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of
circumstances under which they are made, not misleading or so
that the Notes Tender Offer Documents comply with applicable
Law, the party that becomes aware of such event or discovers
such information shall use commercially reasonable best efforts
to promptly notify the other party, and Parent shall prepare and
disseminate to the Noteholders on behalf of the Company such
amendment or supplement; provided, however, that
prior to such dissemination, Parent will provide copies thereof
to the Company not less than two Business Days (or such shorter
period of time as is reasonably practicable in light of the
circumstances) in advance of any such dissemination, will
regularly consult with the Company with respect to and during
the process of preparing such amendment or supplement and will
include in such amendment and supplement all reasonable comments
proposed by the Company. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this Section 5.13(c), the Company will
comply with the requirements of
Rule 14e-1
promulgated under the Exchange Act, the TIA and any other
applicable Law in connection with the Notes Tender Offer and
such compliance will not be deemed a breach hereof.
(d) Promptly following the expiration of the consent
solicitation, assuming the requisite consents from Noteholders
(including from persons holding proxies from the Noteholders)
have been received, the Company will use reasonable best efforts
to cause an appropriate supplemental indenture (the
Supplemental Indenture) to become
effective providing for the amendments of the Indenture
contemplated in the Notes Tender Offer Documents;
provided, however, that the Supplemental Indenture
shall become effective only concurrently with the Effective Time
and only if all conditions to the Notes Tender Offer have been
satisfied or waived by the Company in accordance with the terms
hereof and thereof and the Surviving Corporation accepts all
Notes (and related Notes Consents) validly tendered for purchase
and payment pursuant to the Notes Tender Offer, whereupon the
proposed amendments set forth in the Supplemental Indenture
shall become operative. The form and substance of the
Supplemental Indenture will be reasonably satisfactory to Parent
and the Company.
(e) In connection with the Notes Tender Offer, Parent may
select one or more dealer managers, information agents,
depositaries and other agents, in each case as shall be
reasonably acceptable to the Company, to provide assistance in
connection therewith and the Company shall enter into customary
agreements (including indemnities) with such parties so
selected. Parent shall pay, on behalf of the Company, the fees
and out-of-pocket expenses of any dealer manager, information
agent, depositary or other agent retained in connection with the
Notes Tender Offer upon the incurrence of such fees and
out-of-pocket expenses, and Parent further agrees to reimburse
the Company and the Company Subsidiaries and their directors,
officers, employees, consultants, financial advisors,
accountants, legal counsel, investment bankers, and other
agents, advisors and representatives, for all of their
out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred in connection with the
Notes Tender Offer promptly following the incurrence thereof.
The Company agrees to use reasonable best efforts to cause its
counsel to provide any legal opinions reasonably requested
dealer manager engaged in connection with the Notes Tender
Offer. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Parent
shall indemnify and hold harmless the Company, the Company
Subsidiaries and each of their respective officers, directors
and each person that controls the Company within the meaning of
Section 20 of the Exchange Act (each a Company
Person) from and against any and all liabilities,
losses, damages, claims, costs, expenses, interest, awards,
judgments and penalties suffered or incurred by any Company
Person, or to which any Company Person may become subject, that
arises out of, or in any way in connection with, the Notes
Tender Offer or any actions taken, or not taken by Company, or
at the direction of Company, pursuant to this
Section 5.13 or at the request of Parent (provided,
that Parent shall not indemnify the Company pursuant to this
Section 5.13 with respect to any liabilities,
losses, damages, claims, costs, expenses, interest, awards,
judgments or penalties to the extent arising from information
supplied in writing by the Company specifically for inclusion in
the Notes Tender Offer Documents).
Section 5.14 Parent
Board of Directors. As of the Effective Time,
the board of directors of Parent shall take all actions as may
be required to appoint to vacancies or newly-created seats on
such board of directors, to serve until such persons
respective successor shall have been duly elected and qualified
or until the earlier of such
A-45
persons death, resignation or removal in accordance with
the amended articles of incorporation and regulations of Parent
and applicable Law, the following persons: Michael J. Quillen
and Glenn A. Eisenberg. At least one of the directors designated
pursuant to this Section 5.14 shall meet the
independence standards of the listing standards of the NYSE.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if, prior to the Effective Time,
any such designee shall decline or be unable to serve, Parent
and the Company shall agree on mutually acceptable replacement
designees. As of the Effective Time, Parent shall take all
actions as may be required to appoint Kevin S. Crutchfield as
chief executive officer and president of the coal division of
Parent until his successor shall have been duly elected and
qualified or until his earlier death, resignation or removal. As
of the Effective Time, Parent shall take all actions as may be
required to appoint Michael J. Quillen as non-executive
vice-chairman of Parents board of directors until his
successor shall have been duly elected and qualified or until
his earlier death, resignation or removal.
Section 5.15 Dissenters
Rights. Parent shall give the Company prompt
notice of any demands received by Parent for the fair cash value
of Parent Common Stock. Parent (i) shall not, without the
prior written consent of the Company, waive any requirement
under or compliance with the laws of the State of Ohio
applicable to any stockholder of Parent demanding the fair cash
value of shares of Parent Common Stock (each, a
Dissenting Shareholder) and
(ii) shall require each Dissenting Shareholder holding
shares of Parent Common Stock in certificated form to deliver
such shares to Parent, and Parent shall endorse on shares a
legend to the effect that a demand for the fair cash value of
such shares has been made.
Section 5.16 Company
Credit Facility. The Company shall, prior to
the Closing Date, deliver to Parent a payoff letter in customary
form, providing that upon receipt from the Surviving Corporation
of the repayment amount stated therein on the Closing Date, all
of the Companys outstanding obligations (other than
contingent obligations for indemnification that are not then due
and payable) under that certain Credit Agreement, dated
October 26, 2005, by and among Alpha NR Holding, Inc.,
Alpha Natural Resources, LLC, Citicorp North America, Inc., UBS
Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A., National City Bank of
Pennsylvania and PNC Bank, N.A., Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
and UBS Securities will be satisfied and all Liens thereunder
will be released or terminated, as applicable.
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
Section 6.1 Conditions
to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the
Merger. The respective obligation of each
party to effect the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or
waiver on or prior to the Closing Date of the following
conditions:
(a) Stockholder Approvals. Each of
the Company Stockholder Approval and the Parent Stockholder
Approval shall have been obtained.
(b) Governmental and Regulatory
Approvals. All consents, approvals and
actions of, filings with and notices to any Governmental Entity
required to consummate the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby, the failure of which to be made or obtained
is reasonably expected to have or result in, individually or in
the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Parent or the
Company, shall have been made or obtained.
(c) No Injunctions or
Restraints. No judgment, order, decree or Law
entered, enacted, promulgated, enforced or issued by any court
or other Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction or other
legal restraint or prohibition shall be in effect preventing the
consummation of the Merger.
(d) Form S-4. The
Form S-4
shall have become effective under the Securities Act and will
not be the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a
stop order.
(e) Antitrust. The waiting period
(including any extension thereof) applicable to the consummation
of the Merger under the HSR Act shall have expired or been
terminated. All consents, approvals and filings on the list
compiled pursuant to Section 5.3(g) shall have been
obtained or made.
A-46
(f) NYSE Listing. The shares of
Parent Common Stock issuable to the Companys stockholders
as contemplated by this Agreement and all Parent Common Stock
issuable pursuant to Section 5.4 shall have been
approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of
issuance.
Section 6.2 Conditions
to Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub. The
obligation of Parent and Merger Sub to effect the Merger is
further subject to satisfaction or waiver of the following
conditions:
(a) Representations and
Warranties. The representations and
warranties of the Company contained in (i)
Section 3.1(g)(ii) shall be true and correct in all
respects as of the Closing Date, both when made and as of the
Closing Date, (ii) Section 3.1(c) shall be true and
correct in all respects (except for any de minimis inaccuracies
therein) both when made and as of the Closing Date (except to
the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case
as of such date) and (iii) all other representations and
warranties of the Company set forth herein shall be true and
correct in all respects (without giving effect to any
materiality or material adverse effect qualifications contained
therein) both when made and as of the Closing Date, as if made
at and as of such time (except to the extent expressly made as
of an earlier date, in which case as of such date), except where
the failure of such other representations and warranties to be
so true and correct would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on the Company.
(b) Performance of Obligations of the
Company. The Company shall have performed in
all material respects all of its obligations required to be
performed by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing
Date.
(c) Officers
Certificate. The Company shall have furnished
Parent with a certificate dated the Closing Date signed on its
behalf by an executive officer to the effect that the conditions
set forth in Sections 6.2(a) and 6.2(b)
have been satisfied.
(d) Tax Opinion. Parent shall have
received from Jones Day, counsel to Parent, an opinion dated as
of the Closing Date, to the effect that the Merger will
constitute a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and Parent and the Company will
each be a party to such reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(b) of the Code. In rendering such opinion,
counsel for Parent may require delivery of, and rely upon, the
Tax Certificates.
Section 6.3 Conditions
to Obligations of the Company. The obligation
of the Company to effect the Merger is further subject to
satisfaction or waiver of the following conditions:
(a) Representations and
Warranties. The representations and
warranties of Parent and Merger Sub contained in (i)
Section 3.2(g)(ii) shall be true and correct in all
respects both when made and as of the Closing Date, (ii)
Section 3.2(c) shall be true and correct in all
respects (except for any de minimis inaccuracies therein) both
when made and as of the Closing Date (except to the extent
expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case as of such
date) and (iii) all other representations and warranties of
Parent and Merger Sub set forth herein shall be true and correct
in all respects (without giving effect to any materiality or
material adverse effect qualifications contained therein) both
when made and as of such time, as if made at and as of the
Closing Date (except to the extent expressly made as of an
earlier date, in which case as of such date), except where the
failure of such other representations and warranties to be so
true and correct would not reasonably be expected to have or
result in, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on Parent and Merger Sub.
(b) Performance of Obligations of Parent and Merger
Sub. Each of Parent and Merger Sub shall have
performed in all material respects all obligations required to
be performed by it under this Agreement at or prior to the
Closing Date.
(c) Officers
Certificate. Each of Parent and Merger Sub
shall have furnished the Company with a certificate dated the
Closing Date signed on its behalf by an executive officer to the
effect that the conditions set forth in
Sections 6.3(a) and 6.3(b) have been
satisfied.
(d) Tax Opinion. The Company shall
have received from Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
LLP, counsel to the Company, an opinion dated as of the Closing
Date, to the effect that the Merger will constitute a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and Parent and the Company will
each be a
A-47
party to such reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(b) of the Code. In rendering such opinion,
counsel for the Company may require delivery of, and rely upon,
the Tax Certificates.
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION
Section 7.1 Termination.
(a) Termination by Mutual
Consent. This Agreement may be terminated at
any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after
the Company Stockholder Approval or the Parent Stockholder
Approval, by mutual written consent of Parent and the Company
(with any termination by Parent also being an effective
termination by Merger Sub).
(b) Termination by Parent or the
Company. This Agreement may be terminated at
any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after
the Company Stockholder Approval or the Parent Stockholder
Approval, by either Parent or the Company (with any termination
by Parent also being an effective termination by Merger Sub):
(i) if the Merger has not been consummated on or before
January 15, 2009, or such later date, if any, as Parent and
the Company agree upon in writing (as such date may be extended,
the Outside Date); provided,
however, that the right to terminate this Agreement
pursuant to this Section 7.1(b)(i) is not available
to any party either (x) whose breach of any provision of
this Agreement results in or causes the failure of the Merger to
be consummated by such time or (y) that has yet to have its
stockholders vote at the Company Stockholder Meeting or the
Parent Stockholder Meeting, as the case may be, on whether to
provide the Company Stockholder Approval or the Parent
Stockholder Approval, as the case may be; provided
further, however, that if on the Outside Date the
conditions to the Closing set forth in
Sections 6.1(b) and 6.1(e) shall not have
been fulfilled but all other conditions to the Closing shall be
fulfilled or shall be capable of being fulfilled, then the
Outside Date shall, without any action on the part of the
parties, be extended to April 15, 2009 and such date shall
become the Outside Date for the purposes of this
Agreement; or
(ii) if the Company Stockholders Meeting (including any
adjournment or postponement thereof) has concluded, the
Companys stockholders have voted, and the Company
Stockholder Approval was not obtained; or
(iii) if the Parent Stockholders Meeting (including any
adjournment or postponement thereof) has concluded, the
Parents stockholders have voted, and the Parent
Stockholder Approval was not obtained.
(c) Termination by Parent. This
Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective
Time, whether before or after the Company Stockholder Approval
or the Parent Stockholder Approval, by written notice of Parent
(with any termination by Parent also being an effective
termination by Merger Sub):
(i) (A) if the Company has breached or failed to
perform any of its covenants or other agreements contained in
this Agreement (other than as set forth in
Section 7.1(c)(ii)) to be complied with by the
Company such that the closing condition set forth in Section
6.2(b) would not be satisfied or (B) there exists a
breach of any representation or warranty of the Company
contained in this Agreement such that the closing condition set
forth in Section 6.2(a) would not be satisfied and,
in the case of both (A) and (B), such breach or failure to
perform (1) is not cured within 30 days after receipt
of written notice thereof or (2) is incapable of being
cured by the Company by the Outside Date; or
(ii) (A) if the Board of Directors of the Company or
any committee thereof has made a Company Adverse Recommendation
Change or (B) the Company has materially breached the
provisions of Section 4.2 or breached the provisions
of Section 5.1(b) (other than immaterial breaches of
the first sentence thereof).
A-48
(d) Termination by the
Company. This Agreement may be terminated at
any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after
the Company Stockholder Approval or the Parent Stockholder
Approval, by written notice of the Company:
(i) (A) if either Parent or Merger Sub has breached or
failed to perform any of its covenants or other agreements
contained in this Agreement (other than as set forth in
Section 7.1(d)(ii)) to be complied with by Parent or
Merger Sub such that the closing condition set forth in
Section 6.3(b) would not be satisfied, or
(B) there exists a breach of any representation or warranty
of Parent or Merger Sub contained in this Agreement such that
the closing condition set forth in Section 6.3(a)
would not be satisfied and, in the case of both (A) and
(B), such breach or failure to perform (1) is not cured
within 30 days after receipt of written notice thereof or
(2) is incapable of being cured by Parent by the Outside
Date.
(ii) if (A) the Board of Directors of Parent or any
committee thereof has made a Parent Adverse Recommendation
Change or (B) the Parent has breached the provisions of
Section 5.1(b) (other than immaterial breaches of
the first sentence thereof); or
(iii) if the Board of Directors of the Company shall have
approved in compliance with Section 4.2, and the
Company shall concurrently with such termination enter into, an
Acquisition Agreement providing for the implementation of the
transactions contemplated by a Superior Proposal;
provided, that in order for the termination of this
Agreement pursuant to this Section 7.1(d)(iii) to be
effective, the Company shall have paid the Company Termination
Fee in accordance with Section 7.3(b)(w).
Section 7.2 Effect
of Termination. In the event of termination
of this Agreement by either the Company or Parent as provided in
Section 7.1, this Agreement will forthwith become
void and have no effect, without any liability or obligation on
the part of Parent, Merger Sub or the Company, other than the
provisions of Confidentiality Agreement, the proviso to the
first sentence of Section 5.3(a), the last sentence
of Section 5.13, this Section 7.2,
Section 7.3, and Article VIII, which
provisions shall survive such termination; provided,
however, that nothing herein will relieve any party from
any liability for any willful and material breach by such party
of this Agreement.
Section 7.3 Fees
and Expenses.
(a) Division of Fees and
Expenses. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in this Agreement, all fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the Merger, this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby will be paid by the party incurring such
fees or expenses, whether or not the Merger is consummated,
except that each of Parent and the Company will bear and pay
one-half of the costs and expenses incurred in connection with
the filing, printing and mailing of the
Form S-4
and the Joint Proxy Statement (including SEC filing fees) and
except as specified in Section 5.13 and the proviso
to the first sentence of Section 5.3(a).
(b) Event of Termination.
(w) In the event that this Agreement (i) is terminated
pursuant to Section 7.1(c)(ii), (ii) is
terminated pursuant to Section 7.1(d)(iii), or
(iii) is terminated pursuant to
Section 7.1(b)(i), Section 7.1(b)(ii) or
Section 7.1(c)(i) and (A) prior to such
termination, a Company Takeover Proposal shall have been made
public and (B) within 12 months of such termination
the Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries enters into a
definitive agreement with respect to, or consummates, any
Company Takeover Proposal, then the Company shall (1) in
the case of termination pursuant to clause (i) of this
Section 7.3(b)(w), promptly, but in no event later
than two Business Days after the date of such termination,
(2) in the case of termination pursuant to clause (ii)
of this Section 7.3(b)(w), on the date of termination of
this Agreement, or (3) in the case of termination pursuant
to clause (iii) of this Section 7.3(b)(w), upon
the earlier to occur of (A) consummation of such Company
Takeover Proposal or (B) if such Company Takeover Proposal
is not consummated and within 24 months of the execution of
the definitive agreement with respect to such Company Takeover
Proposal, the Company consummates any other Company Takeover
Proposal, the consummation of such other Company Takeover
Proposal, pay Parent a non-refundable fee equal to
$350 million (the Company Termination
Fee), payable by wire transfer of same day funds
to an account designated in writing to the Company by Parent.
(x) In the event that this Agreement is terminated pursuant
to Section 7.1(d)(ii), then Parent shall promptly,
but in no event later than two Business Days after the date of
such termination, pay the Company a
A-49
non-refundable fee equal to $350 million(the
Parent Termination Fee), payable by
wire transfer of same day funds to an account designated in
writing to Parent by the Company.
(y) In the event of a termination of this Agreement
pursuant to Section 7.1(b)(ii), the Company shall
pay, or cause to be paid, to Parent a non-refundable fee equal
to $100 million (the Company No Vote
Termination Fee) by wire transfer of same day
funds to an account designated in writing to the Company by
Parent promptly, but in no event later than two Business Days
after the date of such termination. In the event of a
termination of this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(b)(iii), Parent shall pay, or cause to
be paid, to the Company a non-refundable fee equal to
$100 million (the Parent No Vote Termination
Fee) by wire transfer of same day funds to an
account designated in writing to Parent by the Company promptly,
but in no event later than two Business Days after the date of
such termination. Notwithstanding anything herein to the
contrary, if the conditions to termination specified in both
Sections 7.1(b)(ii) and Section 7.1(b)(iii)
are satisfied then neither the Company No Vote Termination Fee
nor the Parent No Vote Termination Fee shall be payable.
(z) In the event of a termination of this Agreement
pursuant to Section 7.1(b)(i),
Section 7.1(b)(iii) or
Section 7.1(d)(i), and (A) prior to such
termination, a Parent Alternative Proposal that is conditioned
upon or designed to cause the termination or failure of the
Merger or this Agreement shall have been made public and
(B) within 12 months of such termination Parent or any
of the Parent Subsidiaries enters into a definitive agreement
with respect to, or consummates, any Parent Alternative
Proposal, then Parent shall pay, or cause to be paid, upon the
earlier to occur of the execution of such definitive agreement
and such consummation, the Parent Termination Fee, payable by
wire transfer of same day funds to an account designated in
writing to Parent by the Company. A Parent
Alternative Proposal means any inquiry, proposal
or offer from any person relating to any (A) direct or
indirect acquisition or purchase of a business that constitutes
25% or more of the net revenues, net income or the assets of
Parent and the Parent Subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
(B) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of 25% or
more of any class of equity securities of Parent, (C) any
tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would result
in any person beneficially owning 25% or more of any class of
equity securities of Parent, or (D) any merger,
consolidation, business combination, asset purchase,
recapitalization or similar transaction involving Parent.
(c) Failure to Pay Fees and
Expenses. Each party acknowledges that the
agreements contained in this Section 7.3 are an
integral part of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, and that, without these agreements, neither party
would enter into this Agreement. Accordingly, if either party
fails to pay promptly the amounts due pursuant to this
Section 7.3, and, in order to obtain such payment,
the other party commences a suit that results in a judgment
against such party for the Company Termination Fee, Parent
Termination Fee, Company No Vote Fee or Parent No Vote Fee, as
applicable, that results in a judgment against the defaulting
party for the Company Termination Fee, Parent Termination Fee,
Company No Vote Fee or Parent No Vote Fee, as applicable, the
defaulting party shall pay to the other party its reasonable
costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees
and expenses) in connection with such suit, together with
interest on the amount of the Company Termination Fee, Parent
Termination Fee, Company No Vote Fee or Parent No Vote Fee, as
applicable. Without limiting any rights or remedies of the
parties in law or equity, in no event shall the aggregate fees
payable by either party pursuant to Section 7.3(b)
exceed the Parent Termination Fee or the Company Termination
Fee, as applicable. The payment of any fees payable by either
party pursuant to Section 7.3(b) shall not
constitute or be construed as constituting liquidating damages
or prejudice any rights or remedies available to the parties in
law or equity.
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 8.1 Nonsurvival
of Representations and Warranties. None of
the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in
this Agreement or in any instrument delivered pursuant to this
Agreement will survive the Effective Time, except each of the
covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement that by its
terms contemplate performance after the Effective Time,
including Articles II and VIII and in
Sections 5.4, 5.5, 5.12 and 5.13(e), each of
which will survive in accordance with its terms.
A-50
Section 8.2 Notices. Except
for notices that are specifically required by the terms of this
Agreement to be delivered orally, all notices, requests, claims,
demands and other communications under this Agreement must be in
writing and will be deemed given if delivered personally,
facsimiled (which is confirmed) or sent by a nationally
recognized overnight courier service (providing proof of
delivery) to the parties at the following addresses (or at such
other address for a party as is specified by like notice):
if to Parent or Merger Sub, to:
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc
1100 Superior Avenue East, Suite 1500
Cleveland, Ohio
44114-2544
Telecopy No.:
216-694-6741
Attention: George W. Hawk, Esq.
General
Counsel and Secretary
with a copy to:
Jones Day
North Point
901 Lakeside Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Telecopy No.:
(216) 579-0212
Attention: Lyle G. Ganske
James
P. Dougherty; and
if to the Company, to:
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
P.O. Box 2345
Abingdon, Virginia 24212
Telecopy No.:
(276) 628-3116
Attention: Vaughn R. Groves, Esq.
Vice
President and General Counsel
with a copy to:
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
One Liberty Plaza
New York, NY 10006
Telecopy No.: (212) 225 -3999
Attention: Ethan A. Klingsberg
Jeffrey
S. Lewis
Section 8.3 Interpretation. When
a reference is made in this Agreement to an Article, Section or
Exhibit, such reference is to an Article or Section of, or an
Exhibit to, this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table
of contents, table of defined terms and headings contained in
this Agreement are for reference purposes only and do not affect
in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
Whenever the words include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they will be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words hereof,
herein and hereunder and words of
similar import when used in this Agreement will refer to this
Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this
Agreement. All terms defined in this Agreement will have the
defined meanings when used in any certificate or other document
made or delivered pursuant hereto unless otherwise defined
therein. The definitions contained in this Agreement are
applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such
terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter
genders of such term. Any statute defined or referred to herein
means such statute as from time to time amended, modified or
supplemented, including (in the case of agreements or
instruments) by waiver or consent and (in the case of statutes)
by succession of comparable successor statutes. Any reference to
a date or time in this Agreement shall be deemed to be such date
or time in New York City. The parties hereto have participated
jointly in the negotiating and drafting of this Agreement and,
in the event an ambiguity or question of intent arises, this
Agreement shall be construed as
A-51
jointly drafted by the parties hereto and no presumption or
burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by
virtue of the authorship of any provision of this Agreement. For
purposes of this Agreement:
(a) person means an individual,
corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint
venture, association, trust, unincorporated organization or
other entity (including its permitted successors and assigns);
(b) knowledge of any person that is not
an individual means the knowledge after due inquiry of such
persons executive officers;
(c) affiliate of any person means
another person that directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, such first person, where control means
the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct
or cause the direction of the management policies of a person,
whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract
or otherwise;
(d) Liens means all pledges, claims,
liens, options, charges, easements, restrictions, covenants,
conditions of record, encroachments, encumbrances and security
interests of any kind or nature whatsoever;
(e) Permitted Liens means
(i) statutory liens securing payments not yet due,
(ii) such imperfections or irregularities of title, claims,
liens, charges, security interests, easements, covenants and
other restrictions or encumbrances as would not reasonably be
expected to materially impair business unit of Parent or the
Company, as the case may be, that owns such property or assets,
(iii) mortgages, or deeds of trust, security interests or
other encumbrances on title related to indebtedness reflected on
the consolidated financial statements (x) of the Company
set forth in Section 8.3(a) of the Company Disclosure
Letter or (y) of Parent set forth in Section 8.3(a) of
the Parent Disclosure Letter, (iv) Liens for Taxes not yet
due and payable or that are being contested in good faith and by
appropriate proceedings, (v) mechanics,
materialmens or other Liens or security interests arising
by operation of law that secure a liquidated amount that are
being contested in good faith and by appropriate proceedings and
for which adequate reserves have been maintained in accordance
with GAAP, (vi) any other Liens that would not reasonably
be expected to materially impair business unit of Parent or the
Company, as the case may be, that owns such property or assets,
(vii) pledges or deposits to secure obligations under
workers compensation Laws or similar legislation or to
secure public or statutory obligations, and (viii) pledges
and deposits to secure the performance of bids, trade contracts,
leases, surety and appeal bonds, performance bonds and other
obligations of a similar nature, in each case in the ordinary
course of business; and
(f) material adverse change or
material adverse effect means, when used in
connection with Parent or the Company, any event, circumstance,
change, occurrence or state of facts that has a
(i) material adverse effect on the business, financial
condition or results of operations of such party and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole (other than events,
circumstances, changes, occurrences or any state of facts
relating to (A) changes in industries relating to such
party and its subsidiaries in general, other than the effects of
any such changes which adversely affect such party and its
subsidiaries to a materially greater extent than their
competitors in the applicable industries in which such party and
its subsidiaries compete, (B) general legal, regulatory,
political, business, economic, financial or securities market
conditions in the United States or elsewhere, other than the
effects of any such changes which adversely affect such party
and its subsidiaries to a materially greater extent than its
competitors in the applicable industries in which such party and
its subsidiaries compete, (C) the execution or the
announcement of this Agreement, the undertaking and performance
of the obligations contemplated by this Agreement or the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including
the impact thereof on relationships with customers, suppliers,
distributors, partners or employees, or any litigation arising
relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, (D) acts of war, insurrection, sabotage or
terrorism (or the escalation of the foregoing), (E) changes
in GAAP or the accounting rules or regulations of the SEC, or
(F) the fact, in and of itself (and not the underlying
causes thereof) that such party or any of its Subsidiaries
failed to meet any projections, forecasts, or revenue or
earnings predictions or (ii) prevent or materially delay
the ability of such party to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement; and the terms
material and materially have correlative
meanings other than in the second to last sentence of
Section 5.3(a) and the definition of Permitted
Liens; and
A-52
(g) subsidiary of any person means
another person, an amount of the voting securities, other voting
ownership or voting partnership interests of which is sufficient
to elect at least a majority of its Board of Directors or other
governing body (or, if there are no such voting interests, 50%
or more of the equity interest of which) is owned directly or
indirectly by such first person.
Section 8.4 Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of
which will be considered one and the same agreement and will
become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed
by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties.
Section 8.5 Entire
Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This
Agreement, including the Company Disclosure Letter and the
Parent Disclosure Letter and the Confidentiality Agreement
(a) constitutes the entire agreement, and supersedes all
prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral,
among the parties with respect to the subject matter of this
Agreement and (b) except for the proviso to the first
sentence of Section 5.3(a), the provisions of
Section 5.4, Section 5.6, and the last
two sentences of Section 5.13(e), is not intended to
confer upon any person other than the parties any rights or
remedies. Notwithstanding clause (b) of the immediately
preceding sentence, following the Effective Time, the provisions
of Article II shall be enforceable by the holders of
Company Certificates and Book-Entry Shares.
Section 8.6 Governing
Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising
out of, relating to, or in connection with this Agreement is to
be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the Laws of
the State of Delaware, regardless of the Laws that might
otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflict of Laws
thereof.
Section 8.7 Assignment. Neither
this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations
under this Agreement may be assigned, in whole or in part, by
operation of Law or otherwise by any of the parties hereto
without the prior written consent of the other parties. Any
assignment in violation of this Section 8.7 will be
void and of no effect. Subject to the preceding two sentences,
this Agreement is binding upon, inures to the benefit of, and is
enforceable by, the parties and their respective successors and
assigns.
Section 8.8 Consent
to Jurisdiction.
(a) Each of the parties hereto (i) consents to submit
itself to the personal jurisdiction of the chancery courts
located in the State of Delaware or if jurisdiction in such
court is not available, any federal court of the United States
located in the Borough of Manhattan in the State of New York in
the event any dispute arises out of, relating to or in
connection with this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, (ii) agrees that it will
not attempt to deny or defeat such personal jurisdiction by
motion or other request for leave from any such court and
(iii) agrees that it will not bring any action arising out
of, relating to or in connection with this Agreement or any of
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement in any court
other than the chancery courts in the State of Delaware or, if
under applicable law exclusive jurisdiction over such matter is
vested in the federal courts, any federal court of the United
States located in the Borough of Manhattan in the State of New
York.
(b) EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY
WHICH MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE
COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND THEREFORE IT HEREBY
IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO
A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR
INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF, RELATING TO OR IN CONNECTION WITH
THIS AGREEMENT AND ANY OF THE AGREEMENTS DELIVERED IN CONNECTION
HEREWITH OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY.
EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT (I) NO
REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS
REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD
NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE EITHER OF SUCH
WAIVERS, (II) IT UNDERSTANDS AND HAS CONSIDERED THE
IMPLICATIONS OF SUCH WAIVERS, (III) IT MAKES SUCH WAIVERS
VOLUNTARILY, AND (IV) IT HAS BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO
THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND
CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION 8.8(b).
Section 8.9 Specific
Enforcement. The parties agree that
irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the
provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance
with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. The
parties accordingly agree that the parties will be entitled to
an injunction or injunctions to
A-53
prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically
the terms and provisions of this Agreement in the chancery
courts located in the State of Delaware or if jurisdiction in
such court is not available, any federal court of the United
States located in the Borough of Manhattan, this being in
addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law
or in equity.
Section 8.10 Amendment. This
Agreement may be amended by the parties at any time before or
after the Company Stockholder Approval or the Parent Stockholder
Approval; provided, however, that, after such
approval, there is not to be made any amendment that by Law
requires further approval by the stockholders of the Company or
the stockholders of Parent, as applicable, without further
approval of such stockholders. This Agreement may not be amended
except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of
the parties.
Section 8.11 Extension;
Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective
Time, a party may (a) extend the time for the performance
of any of the obligations or other acts of the other party,
(b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and
warranties of the other party contained in this Agreement or in
any document delivered pursuant to this Agreement or
(c) subject to the proviso of Section 8.10,
waive compliance by the other parties with any of the agreements
or conditions contained in this Agreement. Any agreement on the
part of a party to any such extension or waiver will be valid
only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf
of such party. The failure of any party to this Agreement to
assert any of its rights under this Agreement or otherwise will
not constitute a waiver of such rights.
Section 8.12 Severability. If
any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of Law or
public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this
Agreement will nevertheless remain in full force and effect.
Upon such determination that any term or other provision is
invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties
hereto shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so
as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as
possible to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law in an
acceptable manner to the end that the transactions contemplated
hereby are fulfilled to the extent possible.
(Signatures
are on the following page.)
A-54
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be signed by their respective officers thereunto
duly authorized, all as of the date first written above.
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
A. Carrabba
|
Name: Joseph A. Carrabba
Title: Chairman, President and CEO
DAILY DOUBLE ACQUISITION, INC.
Name: George W. Hawk
Title: Secretary
ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael
J. Quillen
|
Name: Michael J. Quillen
Title: Chairman & CEO
A-55
ANNEX
B
July 15, 2008
The Board of Directors
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
One Alpha Place
P.O. Box 2345
Abingdon, Virginia 24212
Members of the Board:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of the common stock of
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (Alpha) of the Merger
Consideration (defined below) to be received by such holders
pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in
an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement) proposed to be entered into among Alpha,
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (Cleveland-Cliffs) and Merger
Sub (Merger Sub). As more fully described in the
Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub will be merged with and
into Alpha (the Merger) and (ii) each
outstanding share of the common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, of Alpha (Alpha Common Stock) will be
converted into the right to receive $22.23 in cash (the
Cash Consideration) and 0.95 shares (the
Stock Consideration) of common stock, par value
$0.125 per share, of Cleveland-Cliffs (Cleveland-Cliffs
Common Stock). The Stock Consideration and the Cash
Consideration, collectively, are referred to as the Merger
Consideration.
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed a draft dated
July 14, 2008, of the Merger Agreement and held discussions
with certain senior officers, directors and other
representatives and advisors of Alpha and certain senior
officers and other representatives and advisors of
Cleveland-Cliffs concerning the businesses, operations and
prospects of Alpha and Cleveland-Cliffs. We examined certain
publicly available business and financial information relating
to Alpha and Cleveland-Cliffs as well as certain financial
forecasts and other information and data relating to Alpha and
Cleveland-Cliffs which were provided to or discussed with us by
the respective managements of Alpha and Cleveland-Cliffs,
including information relating to the potential strategic
implications and operational benefits (including the amount,
timing and achievability thereof) anticipated by the managements
of Alpha and Cleveland-Cliffs to result from the Merger. We
reviewed the financial terms of the Merger as set forth in the
Merger Agreement in relation to, among other things: current and
historical market prices and trading volumes of Alpha Common
Stock and Cleveland-Cliffs Common Stock; the historical and
projected earnings and other operating data of Alpha and
Cleveland-Cliffs; and the capitalization and financial condition
of Alpha and Cleveland-Cliffs. We considered and analyzed
certain financial, stock market and other publicly available
information relating to the businesses of other companies whose
operations we considered relevant in evaluating those of Alpha
and Cleveland-Cliffs. We also evaluated certain potential pro
forma financial effects of the Merger on Cleveland-Cliffs. In
connection with our engagement, we advised the Company on
discussions it had with selected third parties with respect to
the possible acquisition of, or other combination with, Alpha.
In addition to the foregoing, we conducted such other analyses
and examinations and considered such other information and
financial, economic and market criteria as we deemed appropriate
in arriving at our opinion. The issuance of our opinion has been
authorized by our fairness opinion committee.
In rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied, without
independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of
all financial and other information and data publicly available
or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us and
upon the assurances of the managements of Alpha and
Cleveland-Cliffs that they are not aware of any relevant
information that has been omitted or that remains undisclosed to
us. With respect to financial forecasts and other information
and data relating to Alpha and Cleveland-Cliffs provided to or
otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us, we have been advised
by the respective managements of Alpha and Cleveland-Cliffs that
such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably
prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of the managements of Alpha and
Cleveland-Cliffs as to the future financial performance of Alpha
and Cleveland-Cliffs, the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits (including the amount, timing and
achievability thereof) anticipated to result from the Merger and
the other matters covered thereby.
B-1
We have assumed, with your consent, that the Merger will be
consummated in accordance with its terms, without waiver,
modification or amendment of any material term, condition or
agreement and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary
regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for
the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will
be imposed that would have an adverse effect on Alpha,
Cleveland-Cliffs or the contemplated benefits of the Merger.
Representatives of Alpha have advised us, and we further have
assumed, that the final terms of the Merger Agreement will not
vary materially from those set forth in the draft reviewed by
us. We also have assumed, with your consent, that the Merger
will be treated as a tax-free reorganization for federal income
tax purposes. We are not expressing any opinion as to what the
value of the Cleveland-Cliffs Common Stock actually will be when
issued pursuant to the Merger or the price at which the
Cleveland-Cliffs Common Stock will trade at any time. We have
not made or been provided with an independent evaluation or
appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise)
of Alpha or Cleveland-Cliffs nor have we made any physical
inspection of the properties or assets of Alpha or
Cleveland-Cliffs. Our opinion does not address the underlying
business decision of Alpha to effect the Merger, the relative
merits of the Merger as compared to any alternative business
strategies that might exist for Alpha or the effect of any other
transaction in which Alpha might engage. We also express no view
as to, and our opinion does not address, the fairness (financial
or otherwise) of the amount or nature or any other aspect of any
compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any
parties to the Merger, or any class of such persons, relative to
the Merger Consideration. Our opinion is necessarily based upon
information available to us, and financial, stock market and
other conditions and circumstances existing, as of the date
hereof.
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. has acted as financial advisor to
Alpha in connection with the proposed Merger and will receive a
fee for such services, a significant portion of which is
contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. We also will
receive a fee in connection with the delivery of this opinion.
We and our affiliates in the past have provided, and currently
provide, services to Alpha unrelated to the proposed Merger, for
which services we and such affiliates have received and expect
to receive compensation, including, without limitation,
(i) acting as joint book-running manager in Alphas
offerings of convertible senior notes and common stock in April
2008, (ii) acting as dealer manager for the tender offer
and consent solicitation made by two of Alphas
subsidiaries in April 2008 with respect to senior notes
co-issued by such subsidiaries and (iii) acting as
administrative agent, joint lead arranger, joint book manager
and lender under Alphas existing credit facilities. In the
ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates may
actively trade or hold the securities of Alpha and
Cleveland-Cliffs for our own account or for the account of our
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities. In addition, we and our affiliates
(including Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain
relationships with Alpha, Cleveland-Cliffs and their respective
affiliates.
Our advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are
provided for the information of the Board of Directors of Alpha
in its evaluation of the proposed Merger, and our opinion is not
intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation to any
stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act on any
matters relating to the proposed Merger. Based upon and subject
to the foregoing, our experience as investment bankers, our work
as described above and other factors we deemed relevant, we are
of the opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Merger
Consideration is fair, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of Alpha Common Stock.
Very truly yours,
/s/ CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.
B-2
ANNEX C
The Board of Directors
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc
1100 Superior Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
July 15, 2008
Members of the Board of Directors:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (the
Company) of the consideration to be paid by the
Company in the proposed merger (the Transaction) of
Daily Double Acquisition, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company (Merger Sub), with Alpha Natural Resources
Inc. (the Merger Partner). Pursuant to the Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 15, 2008 (the
Agreement), by and among the Company, Merger Sub and
the Merger Partner, the Merger Partner will become a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and each outstanding
share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Merger
Partner (the Merger Partner Common Stock), other
than shares of Merger Partner Common Stock held in treasury or
owned by the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the
Company or the Merger Partner and Dissenting Shares (as defined
in the Agreement), will be converted into the right to receive
consideration per share equal to $22.23 in cash (the Cash
Consideration) without interest and 0.95 shares (the
Stock Consideration, and together with the Cash
Consideration, the Consideration) of the
Companys common stock, par value $0.125 per share (the
Company Common Stock).
In arriving at our opinion, we have (i) reviewed a draft
dated July 15, 2008 of the Agreement; (ii) reviewed
certain publicly available business and financial information
concerning the Merger Partner and the Company and the industries
in which they operate; (iii) compared the financial and
operating performance of the Merger Partner and the Company with
publicly available information concerning certain other
companies we deemed relevant and reviewed the current and
historical market prices of the Merger Partner Common Stock and
the Company Common Stock and certain publicly traded securities
of such other companies; (iv) reviewed certain internal
financial analyses and forecasts prepared by the management of
the Merger Partner, certain analyses of the Merger
Partners business prepared by the management of the
Company and certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
prepared by the management of the Company relating to the
Companys business, as well as the estimated amount and
timing of the cost savings and related expenses and synergies
expected to result from the Transaction (the
Synergies); and (v) performed such other
financial studies and analyses and considered such other
information as we deemed appropriate for the purposes of this
opinion.
In addition, we have held discussions with certain members of
the management of the Merger Partner and the Company with
respect to certain aspects of the Transaction, and the past and
current business operations of the Merger Partner and the
Company, the financial condition and future prospects and
operations of the Merger Partner and the Company, the effects of
the Transaction on the financial condition and future prospects
of the Merger Partner and the Company, and certain other matters
we believed necessary or appropriate to our inquiry.
In giving our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed the
accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly
available or was furnished to or discussed with us by the Merger
Partner and the Company or otherwise reviewed by or for us, and
we have not independently verified (nor have we assumed
responsibility or liability for independently verifying) any
such information or its accuracy or completeness. We have not
conducted or been provided with any valuation or appraisal of
any assets or liabilities, nor have we evaluated the solvency of
the Merger Partner or the Company under any state or federal
laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In
relying on financial analyses and forecasts provided to us or
derived therefrom, including the Synergies, we have assumed that
they have been reasonably prepared based on assumptions
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
by management as to the expected future results of operations
and financial condition of the Merger Partner and the Company to
which such analyses or forecasts relate. We express no view as
to such analyses or forecasts (including the Synergies) or the
assumptions on which they were based. We have also assumed that
the Transaction and the other transactions contemplated by the
Agreement will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United
States federal income tax purposes, and will be consummated as
described in the Agreement, and that the definitive Agreement
will not differ in any material respects from the draft
C-1
thereof furnished to us. We have also assumed that the
representations and warranties made by the Company and the
Merger Partner in the Agreement and the related agreements are
and will be true and correct in all respects material to our
analysis. We are not legal, regulatory or tax experts and have
relied on the assessments made by advisors to the Company with
respect to such issues. We have further assumed that all
material governmental, regulatory or other consents and
approvals necessary for the consummation of the Transaction will
be obtained without any adverse effect on the Merger Partner or
the Company or on the contemplated benefits of the Transaction.
Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we do
not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm this
opinion. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the Consideration to be paid by the
Company in the proposed Transaction and we express no opinion as
to the fairness of the Transaction to the holders of any class
of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company
or as to the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the
Transaction. Furthermore, we express no opinion with respect to
the amount or nature of any compensation to any officers,
directors, or employees of any party to the Transaction, or any
class of such persons relative to the Consideration to be paid
by the Company in the Transaction or with respect to the
fairness of any such compensation. We are expressing no opinion
herein as to the price at which the Company Common Stock or the
Merger Partner Common Stock will trade at any future time.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company with respect
to the proposed Transaction and will receive a fee from the
Company for our services, a substantial portion of which will
become payable only if the proposed Transaction is consummated,
and the Company has agreed to reimburse our expenses and
indemnify us against certain liabilities arising out of our
engagement. During the two years preceding the date of this
letter, we and our affiliates have had commercial or investment
banking relationships with the Company for which we and such
affiliates have received customary compensation. Specifically,
our commercial banking affiliate is an agent bank and a lender
under outstanding credit facilities of the Company, for which it
receives customary compensation or other financial benefits. We
anticipate that we and our affiliates will arrange and provide
financing to the Company in connection with the Transaction for
customary compensation. In the ordinary course of our
businesses, we and our affiliates may actively trade the debt
and equity securities of the Company or the Merger Partner for
our own account or for the accounts of customers and,
accordingly, we may at any time hold long or short positions in
such securities.
The issuance of this opinion has been approved by a fairness
opinion committee of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. This
letter is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company in
connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the
Transaction. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation
to any shareholder of the Company as to how such shareholder
should vote with respect to the Transaction or any other matter.
This opinion may not be disclosed, referred to, or communicated
(in whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose
whatsoever except with our prior written approval. This opinion
may be reproduced in full in any proxy or information statement
mailed to shareholders of the Company but may not otherwise be
disclosed publicly in any manner without our prior written
approval.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion
as of the date hereof that the consideration to be paid by the
Company in the proposed Transaction is fair, from a financial
point of view, to the Company.
Very truly yours,
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J.P.
Morgan Securities Inc.
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
C-2
ANNEX D
Section 262
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
Appraisal Rights
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who
holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand
pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to
such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise
complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has
neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor
consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this
title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery
of the fair value of the stockholders shares of stock
under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and
(c) of this section. As used in this section, the word
stockholder means a holder of record of stock in a
stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock
corporation; the words stock and share
mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and
also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock
corporation; and the words depository receipt mean a
receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing
an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely
of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the
depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of
any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a
merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to
§ 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to
§ 251(g) of this title), § 252,
§ 254, § 257, § 258,
§ 263 or § 264 of this title:
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this
section shall be available for the shares of any class or series
of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect
thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders
entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting of
stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or
consolidation, were either (i) listed on a national
securities exchange or (ii) held of record by more than
2,000 holders; and further provided that no appraisal rights
shall be available for any shares of stock of the constituent
corporation surviving a merger if the merger did not require for
its approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving
corporation as provided in subsection (f) of
§ 251 of this title.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection,
appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the
shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent
corporation if the holders thereof are required by the terms of
an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to
§§ 251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this
title to accept for such stock anything except:
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or
resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof;
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or
depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts
at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be
either listed on a national securities exchange or held of
record by more than 2,000 holders;
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.
and b. of this paragraph; or
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository
receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.,
b. and c. of this paragraph.
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware
corporation party to a merger effected under § 253 of
this title is not owned by the parent corporation immediately
prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the
shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of
incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as
a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation,
any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a
constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all
of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of
incorporation contains such a provision, the
D-1
procedures of this section, including those set forth in
subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply
as nearly as is practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which
appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be
submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the
corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting,
shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record
date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal
rights are available pursuant to subsection (b) or
(c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any or
all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall
include in such notice a copy of this section. Each stockholder
electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of
the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for
appraisal of such stockholders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation
shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to
take such action must do so by a separate written demand as
herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of
such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting
corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent
corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not
voted in favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of
the date that the merger or consolidation has become
effective; or
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to
§ 228 or § 253 of this title, then either a
constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger
or consolidation or the surviving or resulting corporation
within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders
of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation
who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the
merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available
for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such
constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy
of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also
notify such stockholders of the effective date of the merger or
consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may,
within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice,
demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation
the appraisal of such holders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such holders shares. If
such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such
constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the
effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of
the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent
corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the
effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the
surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second
notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such
effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is
sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first
notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder
who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded
appraisal of such holders shares in accordance with this
subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary
or of the transfer agent of the corporation that is required to
give either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the
absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated
therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled
to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix,
in advance, a record date that shall be not more than
10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided,
that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, the record date shall be such
effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice is
given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the
close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the
notice is given.
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation
or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a)
and (d) of this section hereof and who is otherwise
entitled to appraisal rights, may commence an appraisal
proceeding by filing a petition in the Court of Chancery
demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such
stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within
60 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any stockholder who has not commenced an
appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party
shall have the right to withdraw such stockholders demand
for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or
consolidation.
D-2
Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the
requirements of subsections (a) and (d) of this
section hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to
receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting
from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate
number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or
consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal
have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such
shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the
stockholder within 10 days after such stockholders
written request for such a statement is received by the
surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after
expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal
under subsection (d) of this section hereof, whichever is
later. Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a
person who is the beneficial owner of shares of such stock held
either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such
person may, in such persons own name, file a petition or
request from the corporation the statement described in this
subsection.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder,
service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or
resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after
such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in
which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded
payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the
value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or
resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in
Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the
time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by
registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting
corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the
addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1
or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the
hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court
deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by
publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs
thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall
determine the stockholders who have complied with this section
and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may
require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for
their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery
for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal
proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such
direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such
stockholder.
(h) After the Court determines the stockholders entitled to
an appraisal, the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in
accordance with the rules of the Court of Chancery, including
any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through
such proceeding the Court shall determine the fair value of the
shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation,
together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount
determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value,
the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless
the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause
shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through
the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded
quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve
discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time
to time during the period between the effective date of the
merger and the date of payment of the judgment. Upon application
by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder
entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court
may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal
prior to the final determination of the stockholders entitled to
an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list
filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to
subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such
stockholders certificates of stock to the Register in
Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all
proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder
is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of
the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or
resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto.
Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case
of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of
holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender
to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock.
The Courts decree may be enforced as other decrees in the
Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or
resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any
state.
D-3
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the
Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in
the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court
may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any
stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata
against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights
as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be
entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive
payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of
record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the
merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition
for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in
subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder
shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a
written withdrawal of such stockholders demand for an
appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation,
either within 60 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of
this section or thereafter with the written approval of the
corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal
shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal
proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any
stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval
may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just;
provided, however that this provision shall not affect the right
of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding
or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such
stockholders demand for appraisal and to accept the terms
offered upon the merger or consolidation within 60 days
after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, as set
forth in subsection (e) of this section.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to
which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been
converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall
have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the
surviving or resulting corporation.
D-4
ANNEX E
Section 1701.85
of the Ohio General Corporation Law
Dissenting shareholders compliance with
section fair cash value of shares
(A)(1) A shareholder of a domestic corporation is entitled to
relief as a dissenting shareholder in respect of the proposals
described in sections 1701.74, 1701.76, and 1701.84 of the
Revised Code, only in compliance with this section.
(2) If the proposal must be submitted to the shareholders
of the corporation involved, the dissenting shareholder shall be
a record holder of the shares of the corporation as to which the
dissenting shareholder seeks relief as of the date fixed for the
determination of shareholders entitled to notice of a meeting of
the shareholders at which the proposal is to be submitted, and
such shares shall not have been voted in favor of the proposal.
Not later than ten days after the date on which the vote on the
proposal was taken at the meeting of the shareholders, the
dissenting shareholder shall deliver to the corporation a
written demand for payment to the dissenting shareholder of the
fair cash value of the shares as to which the dissenting
shareholder seeks relief, which demand shall state the
dissenting shareholders address, the number and class of
such shares, and the amount claimed by the dissenting
shareholder as the fair cash value of the shares.
(3) The dissenting shareholder entitled to relief under
division (C) of section 1701.84 of the Revised Code in
the case of a merger pursuant to section 1701.80 of the
Revised Code and a dissenting shareholder entitled to relief
under division (E) of section 1701.84 of the Revised
Code in the case of a merger pursuant to section 1701.801
of the Revised Code shall be a record holder of the shares of
the corporation as to which the dissenting shareholder seeks
relief as of the date on which the agreement of merger was
adopted by the directors of that corporation. Within twenty days
after the dissenting shareholder has been sent the notice
provided in section 1701.80 or 1701.801 of the Revised
Code, the dissenting shareholder shall deliver to the
corporation a written demand for payment with the same
information as that provided for in division (A)(2) of this
section.
(4) In the case of a merger or consolidation, a demand
served on the constituent corporation involved constitutes
service on the surviving or the new entity, whether the demand
is served before, on, or after the effective date of the merger
or consolidation. In the case of a conversion, a demand served
on the converting corporation constitutes service on the
converted entity, whether the demand is served before, on, or
after the effective date of the conversion.
(5) If the corporation sends to the dissenting shareholder,
at the address specified in the dissenting shareholders
demand, a request for the certificates representing the shares
as to which the dissenting shareholder seeks relief, the
dissenting shareholder, within fifteen days from the date of the
sending of such request, shall deliver to the corporation the
certificates requested so that the corporation may endorse on
them a legend to the effect that demand for the fair cash value
of such shares has been made. The corporation promptly shall
return the endorsed certificates to the dissenting shareholder.
A dissenting shareholders failure to deliver the
certificates terminates the dissenting shareholders rights
as a dissenting shareholder, at the option of the corporation,
exercised by written notice sent to the dissenting shareholder
within twenty days after the lapse of the
fifteen-day
period, unless a court for good cause shown otherwise directs.
If shares represented by a certificate on which such a legend
has been endorsed are transferred, each new certificate issued
for them shall bear a similar legend, together with the name of
the original dissenting holder of the shares. Upon receiving a
demand for payment from a dissenting shareholder who is the
record holder of uncertificated securities, the corporation
shall make an appropriate notation of the demand for payment in
its shareholder records. If uncertificated shares for which
payment has been demanded are to be transferred, any new
certificate issued for the shares shall bear the legend required
for certificated securities as provided in this paragraph. A
transferee of the shares so endorsed, or of uncertificated
securities where such notation has been made, acquires only the
rights in the corporation as the original dissenting holder of
such shares had immediately after the service of a demand for
payment of the fair cash value of the shares. A request under
this paragraph by the corporation is not an admission by the
corporation that the shareholder is entitled to relief under
this section.
E-1
(B) Unless the corporation and the dissenting shareholder
have come to an agreement on the fair cash value per share of
the shares as to which the dissenting shareholder seeks relief,
the dissenting shareholder or the corporation, which in case of
a merger or consolidation may be the surviving or new entity, or
in the case of a conversion may be the converted entity, within
three months after the service of the demand by the dissenting
shareholder, may file a complaint in the court of common pleas
of the county in which the principal office of the corporation
that issued the shares is located or was located when the
proposal was adopted by the shareholders of the corporation, or,
if the proposal was not required to be submitted to the
shareholders, was approved by the directors. Other dissenting
shareholders, within that three-month period, may join as
plaintiffs or may be joined as defendants in any such
proceeding, and any two or more such proceedings may be
consolidated. The complaint shall contain a brief statement of
the facts, including the vote and the facts entitling the
dissenting shareholder to the relief demanded. No answer to a
complaint is required. Upon the filing of a complaint, the
court, on motion of the petitioner, shall enter an order fixing
a date for a hearing on the complaint and requiring that a copy
of the complaint and a notice of the filing and of the date for
hearing be given to the respondent or defendant in the manner in
which summons is required to be served or substituted service is
required to be made in other cases. On the day fixed for the
hearing on the complaint or any adjournment of it, the court
shall determine from the complaint and from evidence submitted
by either party whether the dissenting shareholder is entitled
to be paid the fair cash value of any shares and, if so, the
number and class of such shares. If the court finds that the
dissenting shareholder is so entitled, the court may appoint one
or more persons as appraisers to receive evidence and to
recommend a decision on the amount of the fair cash value. The
appraisers have power and authority specified in the order of
their appointment. The court thereupon shall make a finding as
to the fair cash value of a share and shall render judgment
against the corporation for the payment of it, with interest at
a rate and from a date as the court considers equitable. The
costs of the proceeding, including reasonable compensation to
the appraisers to be fixed by the court, shall be assessed or
apportioned as the court considers equitable. The proceeding is
a special proceeding and final orders in it may be vacated,
modified, or reversed on appeal pursuant to the Rules of
Appellate Procedure and, to the extent not in conflict with
those rules, Chapter 2505. of the Revised Code. If, during
the pendency of any proceeding instituted under this section, a
suit or proceeding is or has been instituted to enjoin or
otherwise to prevent the carrying out of the action as to which
the shareholder has dissented, the proceeding instituted under
this section shall be stayed until the final determination of
the other suit or proceeding. Unless any provision in division
(D) of this section is applicable, the fair cash value of
the shares that is agreed upon by the parties or fixed under
this section shall be paid within thirty days after the date of
final determination of such value under this division, the
effective date of the amendment to the articles, or the
consummation of the other action involved, whichever occurs
last. Upon the occurrence of the last such event, payment shall
be made immediately to a holder of uncertificated securities
entitled to payment. In the case of holders of shares
represented by certificates, payment shall be made only upon and
simultaneously with the surrender to the corporation of the
certificates representing the shares for which the payment is
made.
(C) If the proposal was required to be submitted to the
shareholders of the corporation, fair cash value as to those
shareholders shall be determined as of the day prior to the day
on which the vote by the shareholders was taken and, in the case
of a merger pursuant to section 1701.80 or 1701.801 of the
Revised Code, fair cash value as to shareholders of a
constituent subsidiary corporation shall be determined as of the
day before the adoption of the agreement of merger by the
directors of the particular subsidiary corporation. The fair
cash value of a share for the purposes of this section is the
amount that a willing seller who is under no compulsion to sell
would be willing to accept and that a willing buyer who is under
no compulsion to purchase would be willing to pay, but in no
event shall the fair cash value of a share exceed the amount
specified in the demand of the particular shareholder. In
computing fair cash value, any appreciation or depreciation in
market value resulting from the proposal submitted to the
directors or to the shareholders shall be excluded.
(D)(1) The right and obligation of a dissenting shareholder to
receive fair cash value and to sell such shares as to which the
dissenting shareholder seeks relief, and the right and
obligation of the corporation to purchase such shares and to pay
the fair cash value of them terminates if any of the following
applies:
(a) The dissenting shareholder has not complied with this
section, unless the corporation by its directors waives such
failure;
E-2
(b) The corporation abandons the action involved or is
finally enjoined or prevented from carrying it out, or the
shareholders rescind their adoption of the action involved;
(c) The dissenting shareholder withdraws the dissenting
shareholders demand, with the consent of the corporation
by its directors;
(d) The corporation and the dissenting shareholder have not
come to an agreement as to the fair cash value per share, and
neither the shareholder nor the corporation has filed or joined
in a complaint under division (B) of this section within
the period provided in that division.
(2) For purposes of division (D)(1) of this section, if the
merger , consolidation, or conversion has become effective and
the surviving , new, or converted entity is not a corporation,
action required to be taken by the directors of the corporation
shall be taken by the partners of a surviving , new, or
converted partnership or the comparable representatives of any
other surviving , new, or converted entity.
(E) From the time of the dissenting shareholders
giving of the demand until either the termination of the rights
and obligations arising from it or the purchase of the shares by
the corporation, all other rights accruing from such shares,
including voting and dividend or distribution rights, are
suspended. If during the suspension, any dividend or
distribution is paid in money upon shares of such class or any
dividend, distribution, or interest is paid in money upon any
securities issued in extinguishment of or in substitution for
such shares, an amount equal to the dividend, distribution, or
interest which, except for the suspension, would have been
payable upon such shares or securities, shall be paid to the
holder of record as a credit upon the fair cash value of the
shares. If the right to receive fair cash value is terminated
other than by the purchase of the shares by the corporation, all
rights of the holder shall be restored and all distributions
which, except for the suspension, would have been made shall be
made to the holder of record of the shares at the time of
termination.
E-3
ANNEX G
Effects
of Merger if Restructured
Under the merger agreement, each of Cliffs and Alpha has the
right, if necessary to preserve the tax treatment of the merger
outlined in sections under the heading Material United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences, to cause the
merger to be restructured so that (1) Alpha will be merged
with and into merger sub, with merger sub continuing as the
surviving entity
and/or
(2) merger sub will be converted into a Delaware limited
liability company before the merger takes place. If it takes
place, this restructuring will not affect the merger
consideration to be received by holders of Alpha common stock in
the merger.
If it is restructured, the merger will have the following
effects:
|
|
|
|
|
Immediately before the merger takes place, merger sub will be
converted from a Delaware corporation to a Delaware limited
liability company, Alpha Merger Sub, LLC.
|
|
|
|
At the effective time of the merger, Alpha will be merged with
and into the merger sub, the separate corporate existence of
Alpha will cease, and merger sub will be the surviving entity,
which is referred to as the surviving entity.
|
|
|
|
At the effective time of the merger, all the property, rights,
privileges, powers and franchises of Alpha and merger sub will
be vested in the surviving entity, and all debts, liabilities
and duties of Alpha and merger sub will become debts,
liabilities and duties of the surviving entity.
|
|
|
|
The certificate of formation and the limited liability company
operating agreement of merger sub will be the certificate of
formation and limited liability company operating agreement of
the surviving entity.
|
|
|
|
The directors of merger sub (as provided for in its limited
liability company operating agreement) immediately before the
effective time of the merger will be the directors of the
surviving entity, until the earlier of their death, resignation
or removal or until their respective successors are duly elected
and qualified. Alphas officers immediately before the
effective time of the merger will be appointed as the officers
of the surviving entity until the earlier of their death,
resignation or removal or until their respective successors are
duly elected and qualified.
|
|
|
|
At the effective time of the merger, the capital stock of Alpha
and the units of limited liability company interest of merger
sub will be treated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each unit of limited liability company interest of merger sub
that is outstanding immediately before the effective time of the
merger will remain outstanding as a unit of limited liability
company interest of the surviving entity.
|
|
|
|
Each share of Alpha common stock that is owned by Cliffs or any
of direct or indirect subsidiary of Cliffs or Alpha immediately
before the effective time of the merger or held in treasury by
Alpha will automatically be cancelled and retired and will cease
to exist, with no consideration being exchanged for those shares.
|
|
|
|
Each other share of Alpha common stock that is issued and
outstanding immediately before the effective time of the merger
(other than shares held by Alpha stockholders who have properly
demanded appraisal rights) will be converted into the right to
receive, without interest and in accordance with the merger
agreement, the merger consideration and cash in lieu of
fractional common shares of Cliffs, as described in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
|
G-1
|
|
|
|
|
At the effective time of the merger, each certificate
representing shares of Alpha common stock that has not been
surrendered will represent only the right to receive upon
surrender of that certificate the merger consideration,
dividends and other distributions on common shares of Cliffs
with a record date after the effective time of the merger,
dividends and other distributions on shares of Alpha common
stock with a record date prior to the effective time of the
merger that remain unpaid as of the effective time of the merger
and cash, without interest, in lieu of fractional shares.
Following the effective time of the merger, no further
registrations of transfers on the stock transfer books of Alpha
or the surviving entity of the shares of Alpha common stock will
be made. If, after the effective time of the merger, Alpha stock
certificates are presented to Cliffs, the surviving entity or
the exchange agent for any reason, they will be cancelled and
exchanged as described above.
|
|
|
|
The surviving entity, Cliffs or the exchange agent for the
merger will be entitled to deduct and withhold from the merger
consideration any amounts it is required to deduct and withhold
under the Code, or any provision of state, local or foreign tax
law. Such amounts, remitted to the appropriate taxing authority,
shall be treated as having been paid to the person on whose
behalf the withholding was made.
|
G-2