UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

HARRIS CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

HARRIS CORPORATION
1025 West NASA Boulevard
Melbourne, Florida 32919

September 18, 2007

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

      You are cordially invited to attend the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Harris Corporation. The meeting will be held at the Harris Customer Briefing Center located at 1025 West NASA Boulevard in Melbourne, Florida, on Friday, October 26, 2007, starting at 10:00 a.m., local time.

      The accompanying Notice of the Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement describe the matters to be acted on at the meeting, which include:

      Your Board of Directors unanimously believes that the election of its nominees for directors and the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm are in the best interests of Harris and its shareholders. Accordingly, your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of its nominees for directors and FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Harris’ independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2008. These matters are discussed in greater detail in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

      Following the voting, I will report on our operations and future plans. There will also be an open discussion period during which your questions and comments will be welcome.

      The attendance of shareholders at our annual meetings has been helpful in maintaining communication and understanding. We hope you will be able to join us. Whether or not you plan to attend, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. You can ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting by voting over the Internet, by telephone or by using a traditional proxy card. Instructions for these convenient ways to vote are set forth on the enclosed voting instruction card.

HARRIS CORPORATION

1025 West NASA Boulevard

Melbourne, Florida 32919

Notice of 2007

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

to be held on October 26, 2007

TO THE HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK
OF HARRIS CORPORATION:

      NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Harris Corporation will be held at Harris Corporation’s Customer Briefing Center located at 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida, on Friday, October 26, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:

      Only holders of common stock of record at the close of business on August 31, 2007 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and all adjournments or postponements thereof.

Melbourne, Florida

September 18, 2007

IMPORTANT NOTICE

Your vote is important. If you do not expect to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders or if you plan to attend but wish to vote by proxy, please vote over the Internet or by telephone or by completing, signing, dating and promptly mailing the enclosed proxy card for which a postage-paid return envelope is provided.

HARRIS CORPORATION

2007 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Statement

for

2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

to be held on October 26, 2007

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING

Why am I receiving this

proxy statement?

      We are furnishing this proxy statement to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Harris Corporation (which we refer to as “Harris,” “we,” “our” or “us”) for use at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on October 26, 2007, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

      On September 18, 2007, we commenced mailing and made available electronically to our shareholders: (1) this proxy statement, (2) the accompanying proxy card and voting instructions, and (3) a copy of our 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2007 and our audited financial statements.

What is a proxy?

      A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the shares you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy, the document in which you make that designation is also called a proxy.

What is a proxy statement?

      This document is a proxy statement. It is a document that we are required by law to give you when we ask you to name a proxy to vote your shares. We encourage you to read this proxy statement carefully.

What is the purpose of the meeting?

      The purpose of the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is to obtain shareholder action on the matters outlined in the notice of meeting included with this proxy statement. These matters include: the election of three directors for three-year terms expiring at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the ratification of the appointment by our Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2008. This proxy statement provides you with detailed information about each of these matters.

What is a record date and

who is entitled to vote at the meeting?

      The record date for the shareholders entitled to vote at the 2007 Annual Meeting is August 31, 2007. The record date was established by our Board as required by Delaware law, the law of our state of incorporation. Owners of record of shares of Harris common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of the 2007 Annual Meeting and to vote at the 2007 Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. You may vote all shares that you owned on the record date.

How many shares can be voted and

what is a quorum?

      You are entitled to one vote for each share of Harris common stock that you own as of the close of business on August 31, 2007. Only our common stock has voting rights. On the record date, there were 136,581,925 shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the 2007 Annual Meeting and approximately 6,742 holders of record.

      A quorum is the minimum number of shares that must be represented in person or by proxy in order for us to conduct the 2007 Annual Meeting. The attendance by proxy or in person of holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote at the 2007 Annual Meeting, or 68,290,964 shares of common stock based on the record date of August 31, 2007, will constitute a quorum to

hold the Annual Meeting. If you grant your proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by proxy card, your shares will be considered present at the 2007 Annual Meeting and part of the quorum.

What different methods can I

use to vote?

      You have a choice of voting:

       • Over the Internet;

       • By telephone;

       • By mail; or

       • In person at the Annual Meeting.

      Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please carefully read the instructions below on how to vote your shares. Because the instructions vary depending on how you hold your shares and the method you use to vote, it is important that you follow the instructions that apply to your particular situation.

      If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, you should not return your proxy card.

What is the difference between

a “record holder” and an owner

holding shares in “street name”?

      If your shares are registered in your name, you are a “record holder.” You will be a record holder if you hold a stock certificate or if you have an account directly with our transfer agent, BNY Mellon Shareowner Services. If your shares are registered or held in the name of your broker or bank or other nominee, your shares are held in “street name” and you are considered the beneficial owner of such shares.

How do I vote if my shares are

held in my name?

Voting over the Internet

      Voting over the Internet is easy and fast and is available 24 hours a day. Read your proxy/voting instruction card and follow the directions. You will be able to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. This vote will be counted immediately, and there is no need to send in your proxy card.

Voting by telephone

      Voting by telephone is also simple and fast and is available 24 hours a day. Call the toll-free telephone number on your proxy/voting instruction card and listen for further directions. To respond to the questions, you must have a touch-tone phone and need to have your proxy/voting instruction card in hand. The telephone voting system allows you to verify that the system has properly recorded your vote. This vote will be counted immediately, and there is no need to send in your proxy card.

Voting by mail

      If you are a shareholder of record, you can save us expense by voting over the Internet or by telephone. Alternatively, you can vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid return envelope provided.

Voting in person at the meeting

      If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you can vote in person. To vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you will need to bring with you to the Annual Meeting proper personal identification and evidence of your share ownership.

How do I vote if my shares are

held in “street name”?

Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by mail

      If your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote, and you should vote your shares using the method directed by your broker, bank or other nominee. In addition to voting by mail, a large number of banks and brokerage firms are participating in online or telephonic voting programs. These programs provide eligible “street name” shareholders the opportunity to vote over the Internet or by telephone. Voting forms will provide instructions for shareholders whose banks or brokerage firms are participating in such programs.

Voting in person at the meeting

      If your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee and if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and to vote in person,

you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee to obtain a broker’s proxy and bring it, together with proper personal identification and your account statement or other evidence of your share ownership, with you to the Annual Meeting.

Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote?

      As long as your shares are registered in your name, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. There are several ways you can do this:

      If your shares are held in street name, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to revoke your proxy or change your vote.

What are my voting choices and

what is the required vote?

      By giving us your proxy, you authorize Harris management to vote your shares at the 2007 Annual Meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof in the manner you indicate.

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

      In February 2007, our Board amended our By-Laws and Corporate Governance Principles to change the voting standard for the election of our directors in uncontested elections from a plurality to a majority voting standard. In contested director elections, the plurality standard will be retained. We have nominated three directors for election at the 2007 Annual Meeting, and because we did not receive advance notice under our By- Laws of any shareholder nominees for directors, the 2007 election for directors is an uncontested election. To be elected in an uncontested election, a director nominee must receive more “For” votes than “Against” votes. Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors since only votes “For” or “Against” a nominee will be counted. If a nominee does not receive a greater number of “For” votes than “Against” votes, he must promptly tender his resignation following certification of the vote. The Corporate Governance Committee shall make a recommendation to the Board regarding action to be taken with respect to such offer to resign. If the Board does not accept the resignation, the nominee will continue to serve until the next annual meeting for the year in which his term expires and until his successor shall be duly elected or until his prior resignation, death or removal. For additional information regarding the majority voting standard, see “Majority Voting for Directors” on page 17.

      With respect to the proposal to elect three nominees for director, you may:

      With respect to the proposal to ratify the appointment by our Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2008, you may:

      The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal will be required to ratify our Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Abstaining from voting on this matter will have the effect of a vote against ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.

What is the Harris Board’s voting recommendation?

      The Harris Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares FOR the election of all three of its nominees for director and FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Harris’ independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2008.

How do I vote shares held in

the Harris Retirement Plan?

      If you are a participant in the Harris Retirement Plan (“Retirement Plan”) and you own shares of Harris common stock through the Retirement Plan, the proxy/voting instruction card sent to you will also serve as a voting instruction card to the trustee of the Retirement Plan for all shares of our common stock you own through the Retirement Plan. If you do not provide voting instructions for such shares, as directed by the terms of the Retirement Plan, those shares will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as the shares for which other participants have timely provided voting instructions.

How do I vote shares held in the Harris Dividend Reinvestment Plan?

      If you are a participant in the Harris Dividend Reinvestment Plan (“DRIP”) administered by Mellon Bank, N.A., your proxy/voting instruction card covers the Harris common stock held in your DRIP account. Mellon Bank, N.A., as the DRIP administrator, is the shareholder of record of our common stock owned through the DRIP and will not vote those shares unless you provide it with instructions, which you may do over the Internet, by telephone or by mail using your proxy card.

What happens if I return an

unmarked proxy card?

      If you return your proxy card with no votes marked, your shares will be voted as recommended by our Board as follows:

      With respect to other matters that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting, your shares will be voted in the discretion of the proxy holders.

How will my shares be voted if I do not provide instructions to my broker?

      It is possible for a proxy to indicate that some of the shares represented are not being voted with respect to certain proposals. This occurs, for example, when a broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretion under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules to vote on a matter without instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and has not received such instructions. In these cases, non-voted shares will not be considered present and entitled to vote with respect to that matter, although they may be considered present and entitled to vote for other purposes and will be counted in determining the presence of a quorum. Accordingly, if a quorum is present at the meeting, non-voted shares concerning a particular proposal will not affect the outcome of that proposal. Under NYSE rules, brokers, banks or other nominees have discretionary voting power to vote without receiving voting instructions from the beneficial owner on “routine” matters, but not on “non-routine” matters. Under the rules of the NYSE as currently in effect, routine matters include, among other things, the election of directors in an uncontested election and the ratification of the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm. This means that if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, and you do not provide voting instructions by the tenth day before the Annual Meeting, the broker, bank or other nominee has the discretion to vote your shares.

What does it mean if I receive more

than one proxy card?

      If you receive more than one proxy card, it means you own shares in multiple accounts with brokers and/or our transfer agent. Please vote all of these shares. We recommend that you contact your broker and/or our transfer agent to consolidate as many accounts as possible under the same name and address. Our transfer agent is

BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, which may be reached by telephone at 1-888-261-6777 or over the Internet at www.melloninvestor.com.

Who pays for the solicitation of proxies?

      We actively solicit proxy participation. We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies, including the cost of preparation, assembly, printing and mailing. In addition to this proxy statement, we request and encourage brokers, custodians, nominees and others to supply proxy materials to shareholders, and, upon request, we will reimburse them for their expenses. Our officers, directors and employees may, by letter, telephone, electronic mail or in person, make additional requests for the return of proxies, although we do not reimburse our own officers, directors or employees for soliciting proxies. We have also engaged Georgeson Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $8,500 plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. We will also reimburse brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to our shareholders in accordance with the fee schedule approved by the NYSE.

May I access this year’s proxy statement and annual report over the Internet?

      This proxy statement and our 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2007, are available by accessing the Investor Relations section of our website, at www.harris.com/investor-relations.html.

Webcast of the

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

      Our 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be webcast live on October 26, 2007. You may visit the Investor Relations section of our website at www.harris.com/investor-relations.html, to access the webcast of the Annual Meeting. The webcast will enable you to listen only. You will not be able to ask questions. An archived copy of the webcast also will be available on our website through November 24, 2007. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

Who will tabulate and oversee the vote?

      Representatives of our transfer agent, BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, will tabulate and oversee the vote.

Where can I find the voting results

of the Annual Meeting?

      We intend to announce the preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and to publish final results in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2008, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and make available on our website at www.harris.com.

Two-for-One Stock Split

      On February 25, 2005, our Board approved a two-for-one stock split of our common stock (the “Stock Split”). The Stock Split was effected in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend distributed on March 30, 2005 to shareholders of record on March 14, 2005. All references to share amounts, number of options and per share amounts in this proxy statement have been retroactively restated to reflect the effect of the Stock Split for all periods.

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — TERMS EXPIRING IN 2010

      Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that our Board shall consist of not less than eight or more than thirteen directors, the exact number of directors to be determined from time to time by the Board. The authorized number of directors is presently fixed at eleven. Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation also classifies our Board into three classes of approximately equal size with three-year terms of office ending in different years.

      This year, the terms of Messrs. Lance, Dattilo and Stoffel expire at the 2007 Annual Meeting. Based upon the recommendation of our Corporate Governance Committee, Messrs. Lance, Dattilo and Stoffel have each been nominated by the Board for a new three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2010. The current terms of our other directors will expire at subsequent Annual Meetings of Shareholders in 2008 or 2009, as the case may be. In accordance with our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, a director holds office until the Annual Meeting of Shareholders for the year in which that director’s term expires, and until that director’s successor is elected and qualified, subject, however, to his or her prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office. Vacancies may be filled by the remaining directors.

      Proxies will be voted in favor of electing each of Messrs. Lance, Dattilo and Stoffel to serve for a three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2010, unless otherwise specified in the proxy/voting instruction card or Internet or telephone voting instructions. Each of the nominees has consented to stand for election. If any nominee becomes unavailable for election, proxies voting for that nominee may be voted for a substitute nominee selected by our Board or, in lieu thereof, our Board may reduce the number of directors.

      None of our directors, including each of the nominees, is related to any other director, or to any executive officer of Harris or its subsidiaries, by blood, marriage or adoption.

      Biographical summaries of the nominees and of our continuing directors appear on subsequent pages, and data with respect to the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them as of July 27, 2007 is set forth in the table on page 22.

NOMINEES UP FOR ELECTION — 

TERMS EXPIRING IN 2010

Howard L. Lance, 51, is our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Lance joined Harris in January 2003 as President and Chief Executive Officer and was appointed Chairman in June 2003. Prior to joining Harris, Mr. Lance was President of NCR Corporation, an information technology services provider, and Chief Operating Officer of its Retail and Financial Group from July 2001 until October 2002. Prior to joining NCR, he spent 17 years with Emerson Electric Company, an electronic products and systems company, where he held increasingly senior management positions with different divisions of the company. In 1999, Mr. Lance was named Executive Vice President with operating responsibility for its Electronics and Telecommunications businesses. Earlier, Mr. Lance held sales and marketing positions with the Scott-Fetzer Company and Caterpillar, Inc.

Mr. Lance has been a member of our Board since January 2003.

Mr. Lance is also a director of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Eastman Chemical Company and serves on the Board of Trustees of the Aerospace Industries Association, the Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI, Inc., the Florida Council of 100, the United Way of Brevard County and the Florida Institute of Technology.

Thomas A. Dattilo, 56, is Senior Advisor for Cerberus Operations and Advisory Company, LLC, a unit of Cerberus Capital Management, a private investment firm. Prior to joining Cerberus in June 2007, Mr. Dattilo was most recently Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, a company that specializes in the design, manufacture and sale of passenger and truck tires.

He joined Cooper in January 1999 as President and Chief Operating Officer and was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from April 2000 until August 2006. Prior to joining Cooper, he held senior positions with Dana Corporation. His last position with Dana was President of its sealing products group.

Mr. Dattilo has been a member of our Board since August 2001 and is a member of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee.

Mr. Dattilo is also a director of Alberto-Culver Company. He is past Chairman of the Rubber Manufacturers Association and past Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Manufacturers Alliance.

Dr. James C. Stoffel, 61, is a retired Senior Vice President, Chief Technical Officer, and Director of Research and Development of Eastman Kodak Company, a film and digital imaging company. He held this position from 2000 to April 2005. He joined Kodak in 1997 as Vice President, Director Electronic Imaging Products Research and Development and became Director of Research and Engineering in 1998. Prior to joining Kodak, he was with Xerox Corporation where he began his career in 1972. His most recent position with Xerox was Vice President, Corporate Research and Technology.

Dr. Stoffel has been a member of our Board since August 2003 and is a member of the Finance Committee and the Management Development and Compensation Committee.

Dr. Stoffel is also a director of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and a trustee of the George Eastman House museum. He serves on the Advisory Board for Research and Graduate Studies at the University of Notre Dame and is a member of the advisory board of ASTRI, Hong Kong.

7

CURRENT DIRECTORS NOT UP FOR ELECTION

     Biographical summaries of our current directors whose terms continue to run until the 2008 or 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders appear below.

Terms Expiring In 2008

Lewis Hay III, 51, is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of FPL Group, Inc., a public utility holding company, and is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Florida Power and Light Company. He joined FPL Group in 1999 as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer. From March 2000 until December 2001, he served as President of FPL Group’s non-utility power-generation subsidiary, FPL Energy, LLC. He was named President and Chief Executive Officer of FPL Group in June 2001 and relinquished the title of President in December 2006. He was named Chairman in January 2002.

Mr. Hay has been a member of our Board since February 2002 and is Chairperson of the Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee.

In addition to being a director of FPL Group, Mr. Hay is also a director of Capital One Financial Corporation, Chairman of the Board of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operators, a director of the Florida Council of 100, a member of the Business Roundtable and a member of the Business Board of Advisors of the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University.

Karen Katen, 58, is Chairman of the Pfizer Foundation, the philanthropic arm of Pfizer Inc. devoted to supporting healthcare access, education and community outreach initiatives around the world. Ms. Katen retired in March 2007 as Vice Chairman of Pfizer Inc., a research-based, global pharmaceutical company. Ms. Katen joined Pfizer in 1974 and held a series of management positions including serving as President of Pfizer Human Health, the company’s principal operating group.

Ms. Katen has been a member of our Board since December 1994 and is a member of the Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Management Development and Compensation Committee.

Ms. Katen is also a director of General Motors Corporation and a board member of the National Alliance for Hispanic Health, Catalyst, RAND Health Advisory Board and the New York Botanical Garden. Ms. Katen is a trustee for the University of Chicago and is a council member of the Graduate School of Business at the University of Chicago.

Stephen P. Kaufman, 65, is retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Arrow Electronics, Inc., a distributor of semiconductors, peripherals and components. He became President and Chief Operating Officer of Arrow in 1985, Chief Executive Officer in 1986, and Chairman in 1994. He retired as Chief Executive Officer in June 2000 and reassumed that position in June 2002 on an interim basis until September 2002. In January 2001, Mr. Kaufman was appointed a senior lecturer at the Harvard Business School. Prior to joining Arrow, he served in executive capacities with Midland-Ross Corporation.

Mr. Kaufman has been a member of our Board since December 1999 and is Chairperson of the Management Development and Compensation Committee and a member of the Finance Committee.

Mr. Kaufman is also a director of KLA-Tencor Corporation and Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc.

Hansel E. Tookes II, 59, retired from Raytheon Company, a company engaged in defense and government electronics, space, information technology, technical services and business and special mission aircraft, in December 2002. He joined Raytheon in September 1999 as President and Chief Operating Officer of its Raytheon Aircraft Company subsidiary, a commercial, military and regional aircraft manufacturing company. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Raytheon Aircraft Company in January 2000 and Chairman in August 2000. He became President of Raytheon International in May 2001. Prior to joining Raytheon in 1999, he served United Technologies Corporation as President of its Pratt & Whitney Large Military Engines Group since 1996. He joined United Technologies Corporation in 1980 and held a variety of senior leadership positions. Mr. Tookes was a Lieutenant Commander and military pilot in the U.S. Navy and later served as a commercial pilot with United Airlines.

Mr. Tookes has been a member of our Board since April 2005 and is a member of the Audit Committee and the Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee.

Mr. Tookes is also a director of Corning Incorporated, BBA Aviation plc, FPL Group, Inc. and Ryder System, Inc.

Terms Expiring in 2009

Terry D. Growcock, 61, is retired Chief Executive Officer of The Manitowoc Company, Inc., a diversified industrial manufacturer of cranes and foodservice equipment and a provider of ship building and ship repair services. He joined Manitowoc in 1994 as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Manitowoc Ice. He became President of Manitowoc Foodservice Group in 1995 and served in that capacity until his promotion to President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. in 1998. Mr. Growcock retired as Chief Executive Officer of Manitowoc in May 2007, but still serves as Chairman of its board. Prior to joining Manitowoc, Mr. Growcock served as Vice President and General Manager of Robertshaw Automotive, a subsidiary of Siebe plc.

Mr. Growcock has been a member of our Board since August 2005 and is a member of the Corporate Governance Committee and the Management Development and Compensation Committee.

In addition to being a director for Manitowoc, Mr. Growcock is also a director of Bemis Manufacturing Company, Chairman of Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, an advisory member of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University, and a director of the National Association of Manufacturers.

Leslie F. Kenne, Lieutenant General USAF (Ret.), 59, retired in September 2003 from the U.S. Air Force, where she had most recently been Deputy Chief of Staff for Warfighting Integration at Air Force headquarters in Washington, D.C. Previously, she commanded the Electronic Systems Center at Hanscom Air Force Base in Massachusetts. She also directed a number of major procurement programs, including the F-16 and Joint Strike Fighter programs. Following her retirement from the U.S. Air Force, Ms. Kenne became President of LK Associates, a private independent consulting firm.

Ms. Kenne has been a member of our Board since April 2004 and is Chairperson of the Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee and a member of the Corporate Governance Committee.

Ms. Kenne is also a director of EDO Corporation and Unisys Corporation.

David B. Rickard, 60, is Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer of CVS Caremark Corporation, a retail pharmacy chain and provider of healthcare services and pharmacy benefits management. He has held this position since joining CVS in September 1999. Prior to joining CVS, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of RJR Nabisco Holdings Corporation from March 1997 to August 1999. Previously, he was Executive Vice President of International Distillers and Vintners Americas.

Mr. Rickard has been a member of our Board since October 2001 and is Chairperson of the Audit Committee and a member of the Finance Committee.

Mr. Rickard is also a director of Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated.

Gregory T. Swienton, 57, is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ryder System, Inc., a logistics and transportation services company. He joined Ryder in June 1999 as President and Chief Operating Officer, and was named Chief Executive Officer in November 2000 and Chairman in May 2002. Prior to joining Ryder, he was Senior Vice President-Growth Initiatives of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (“BNSF”). He held senior positions with BNSF and the former Burlington Northern Railroad from 1994 to 1999, and various executive and management positions with DHL Worldwide Express from 1982 to 1994.

Mr. Swienton has been a member of our Board since February 2000 and is Chairperson of the Finance Committee and a member of the Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee.

In addition to being a director for Ryder System, he is also on the Board of Trustees of St. Thomas University in Miami, Florida.

Recommendation Regarding Proposal 1

     To be elected in an uncontested election of directors, a nominee must receive more “For” votes than “Against” votes. Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors since only votes “For” or “Against” a nominee will be counted.

      Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the nominees in this uncontested election.

GOVERNANCE OF THE COMPANY

Board of Directors

      Our business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board. Members of the Board are kept informed of our business through discussions with the Chairman and officers, by reviewing materials provided to them or requested by them, by visiting our offices and plants and by participating in meetings of the Board and its committees.

Corporate Governance Principles

      Our Board has long been focused on and committed to responsible and effective corporate governance. Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Principles which trace their history to 1960 and which have evolved and been revised over time. Our Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Corporate Governance Principles and reporting and making recommendations to our Board concerning corporate governance matters. Our Corporate Governance Principles address matters including board composition, director independence, selection of Board nominees, Board membership criteria, majority voting for directors, director compensation, mandatory retirement, meetings, executive sessions of non-management directors, evaluation of the performance of our Chief Executive Officer, committees, succession planning, director responsibilities, orientation and continuing education, and self-evaluation of the Board and Board committees. A copy of our Corporate Governance Principles is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement and is also available on the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.harris.com/harris/cg/.

Director Independence

      The NYSE listing standards and our Corporate Governance Principles require us to have a board of directors with at least a majority of independent directors. Our Board has, and has had for many years, a substantial majority of independent directors. Our Board has adopted Director Independence Standards to assist in the evaluation of the independence of each of our directors. A copy of our Director Independence Standards is available on the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.harris.com/harris/cg/.

      For a director to be considered independent, the Board must affirmatively determine that a director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with us other than as a director. A director will not be independent if, within the preceding three years:

      The Board has determined that the following relationships will not be considered to be material relationships that would impair a director’s independence:

      Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Principles, the Board undertook its annual review of director independence in August 2007, which included a review of the responses of the directors to questions regarding each director’s commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and family relationships, and discussions with the directors and nominees. Based upon the NYSE listing standards and our Director Independence Standards, our Board has affirmatively determined in its business judgment that all of our directors (including each nominee for election), with the exception of Mr. Lance, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, are independent and have no direct or indirect material relationship with Harris other than as a director.

Related Person Transaction Policy

      In August 2007, our Board approved a written policy and procedures for the review, approval and ratification of transactions among Harris and our directors, executive officers and their related interests. This policy supplements the conflicts of interest policies set forth in our Standards of Business Conduct and our Directors’ Standards of Business Conduct and our other internal procedures. Under the policy, all related person transactions (as defined in the policy) are to be reviewed by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee may approve or ratify related person transactions if in its business judgment it determines that the transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of Harris and its shareholders. This may include situations where we provide or receive products or services to or from related persons on an arm’s length basis on terms comparable to those provided to or received from unrelated third parties. Any director who participates in or is the subject of an existing or potential related person transaction may not participate in the approval or ratification decision-making process of the Corporate Governance Committee.

      Under the policy, and consistent with SEC regulations, a related person transaction is any transaction, arrangement or relationship in which Harris was, is or will be a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which a related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A related person includes any of our directors, nominees for director or executive officers, any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our common stock, an immediate family member of any person described above and

any firm, corporation or other entity controlled by any person described above. The policy requires each director and executive officer annually to complete a questionnaire to identify their related interests and persons, and to notify us of changes in that information. Before entering into a proposed related person transaction, the related person or business area of Harris is requested to notify our Corporate Secretary of the facts and circumstances of the potential transaction. If the Corporate Secretary determines the proposed transaction is a related person transaction, it shall be submitted to the Corporate Governance Committee for review and consideration. A related person transaction entered into without the Corporate Governance Committee’s prior approval will not violate this policy or be unenforceable, so long as the transaction is brought to the Corporate Governance Committee promptly after it is entered into or after it becomes apparent that the transaction is covered by this policy.

      Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. (“FIIS”), a subsidiary of FMR Corp., has provided services to us in connection with the administration of our Retirement Plan. During fiscal 2007 the total amount of expenses directly incurred by us for these services was $42,000. In addition, during fiscal 2007 particpants in the Retirement Plan incurred expenses of $1,265,000 for plan administration and recordkeeping services. Pyramis Global Trust Company, a subsidiary of FMR, provided asset management services for our Retirement Plan for which participants paid $118,000 in fiscal 2007. Based on its holdings reported on a Schedule 13G/ A filed with the SEC, FMR beneficially owned more than five percent of our common stock as of July 27, 2007.

Board Meetings and Attendance

      General. In fiscal 2007, our Board held six regular meetings and three special meetings, and the standing committees of our Board met a total of 21 times. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of those committees of which he or she was a member. All of the directors taken together attended an average of 98% of such meetings of the Board and committees on which they serve.

      Attendance at Annual Meetings of Shareholders. We typically schedule a Board meeting in conjunction with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In the absence of unavoidable conflict, all Board members are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All of our Board members attended the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Executive Sessions of Outside Directors

      Our Board and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule and also hold special meetings and may act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. Executive sessions of non-management directors are held in conjunction with all regularly scheduled Board meetings. Our Board has implemented a system to rotate annually the Board member who chairs these executive sessions of non-management directors among the chairpersons of each of our five standing committees, in alphabetical order by committee name.

Board Committees and Committee Charters

      Currently our Board has five standing committees to assist in the discharge of its responsibilities. These committees are the Audit Committee, the Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, the Finance Committee, and the Management Development and Compensation Committee. Our Board has adopted a written charter for each committee, copies of which are available on the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.harris.com/harris/cg/. Copies of such charters and our Corporate Governance Principles are also available to shareholders free of charge upon written request to our Corporate Secretary at Harris Corporation, 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida 32919. The principal functions of each committee are summarized below.

Audit Committee

      The Audit Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to oversee, among other things:

      The purposes and responsibilities of the Audit Committee also include:

      Our Board has determined in its business judgment that each member of the Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules and our Director Independence Standards.

      Our Board has also determined in its business judgment that each of the members of the Audit Committee satisfies the “financial literacy” requirements of the NYSE and has “accounting or related financial management expertise” and that David B. Rickard, Chairperson of the Audit Committee, satisfies the “audit committee financial expert” criteria as that term is defined by regulation of the SEC and that he is independent of Harris.

      The Audit Committee held eight meetings during the past fiscal year, including meeting regularly with Ernst & Young LLP and our internal auditors, both privately and with management present.

Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee

      The purposes and responsibilities of the Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee include:

      The Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee held two meetings during the past fiscal year.

Corporate Governance Committee

      The purposes and responsibilities of the Corporate Governance Committee include:

      Our Board has determined in its business judgment that each member of the Corporate Governance Committee is independent under the rules of the NYSE and our Director Independence Standards. The Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during the past fiscal year.

Finance Committee

      The Finance Committee is authorized to periodically review our financial position, capital structure, working capital, capital transactions and financial and investment aspects of our benefit plans. The Finance Committee also reviews our dividend policy, capital asset plan and share repurchase policy and makes recommendations to the Board relating to such plan or policies. The Finance Committee held two meetings during the past fiscal year.

Management Development and Compensation Committee

      The purposes and responsibilities of the Management Development and Compensation Committee include:

      Our Board of Directors has determined in its business judgment that each member of the Management Development and Compensation Committee is independent under the rules of the NYSE and our Director Independence Standards. The Management Development and Compensation Committee held five meetings during the past fiscal year.

Committee Membership

      The current committee members for each of the five standing committees of our Board of Directors are as follows, with the chairperson listed first:

Director Retirement

      It is our policy that a director will retire from our Board effective at the end of the month in which he or she reaches age 72. In the event that a director’s 72nd birthday falls within twelve months of the Annual Meeting at which such director would stand for re-election, such director shall not stand for re-election. A director is also expected to automatically tender his or her resignation in the event of retirement or other significant change in status from the employment position held when last elected or appointed to our Board, and our Board will then determine whether such director’s continued Board membership is in the best interest of Harris and our shareholders, free from conflicts of interest and is otherwise appropriate.

Communications with Members of our

Board of Directors

      General. Shareholders and other interested persons wishing to communicate directly with our Board may do so by sending an e-mail message to the Board member then presiding over the meetings of our non-management directors — referred to as our “Presiding Independent Director” — at presiding.director@harris.com. Communications sent by e-mail will go simultaneously to the Presiding Independent Director and also to our Corporate Secretary. Shareholders and others may also write to the Presiding Independent Director, c/o Corporate Secretary, Harris Corporation, 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida 32919. Our Corporate Secretary will review any such written communications and if they are related to the duties and responsibilities of our Board and its committees, they will be forwarded to the Presiding Independent Director. Our Corporate Secretary will periodically provide the Board a summary of all written communications received that were not forwarded because they were unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly inappropriate and will make them available to our Board upon request. Advertisements, solicitations or “spam” and other similar communications will not be forwarded to the directors. The Presiding Independent Director will determine whether communications should be sent to our full Board or a committee.

      Accounting, Internal Control or Auditing Matters. Our Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding questionable accounting, internal control or auditing matters. Any of our employees may communicate concerns about any of these matters to such employee’s supervisor, manager or business standards advisor, or to the Vice President, Internal Audit and Compliance or the Director of Business Conduct or others, or on a confidential and anonymous basis by way of e-mail or our toll-free hotline numbers listed on our website and in our Standards of Business Conduct. Other persons with concerns or complaints may contact our Vice President, Internal Audit and Compliance or Director of Business Conduct at 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida, 32919. Upon receipt of a complaint or concern, a determination will be made whether it pertains to accounting, internal control or auditing matters and if it does, it will be handled in accordance with the procedures established by the Audit Committee.

Standards of Business Conduct

      All Harris employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and other senior financial officers, are required to abide by the Harris Standards of Business Conduct, originally adopted in 1987, to help ensure that our business is conducted in a consistently ethical and legal manner. All directors are required to abide by our

Directors’ Standards of Business Conduct. These standards of business conduct form the foundation of a comprehensive business conduct program that includes compliance with all laws, corporate policies and procedures, an open relationship among employees that contributes to good business conduct, and an abiding belief that we should conduct all business dealings with integrity, honesty and responsibility. Our business conduct policies cover many topics, including employment issues, confidentiality, environmental, health and safety, insider trading, corporate opportunities, antitrust, export control, boycotts, government contracts, international business practices, entertainment and gifts, and use of company assets. Employees are required to report any conduct they believe in good faith to be a violation of any of our business policies.

      Our Standards of Business Conduct and our Directors’ Standards of Business Conduct are posted on our website at www.harris.com/business-conduct and are also available free of charge by written request to our Director of Business Conduct, Harris Corporation, 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida 32919. Any amendment to, or waiver from, our Standards of Business Conduct will be posted on our website within four business days following such amendment or waiver.

Director Nomination Process and Criteria

      Our Board is responsible for approving nominees to stand for election as directors. The Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in this process and identifies individuals it believes to be qualified to become Board members and recommends nominees.

      It is a long-standing policy of our Board to consider director nominees submitted by shareholders. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a nominee for the Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration must include at least the following information about the proposed nominee: the proposed nominee’s name, age, business or residence address, principal occupation or employment, and the written consent of the nominee to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected. The required information should be sent to our Corporate Secretary at 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida 32919. The Corporate Secretary will forward properly submitted shareholder-proposed nominations to the Chairperson of the Corporate Governance Committee for consideration at a future Corporate Governance Committee meeting. Individuals proposed by shareholders in accordance with these procedures will be evaluated and considered by the Corporate Governance Committee in the same manner as it evaluates other proposed nominees.

      In addition to proposing nominees for consideration to the Corporate Governance Committee, shareholders may also directly propose nominees for consideration at an annual meeting of our shareholders. The requirements and procedures to be followed by shareholders for directly nominating directors are discussed below under “Shareholder Proposals for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.” The Corporate Governance Committee also has a process for considering, reviewing and evaluating incumbent directors up for re-election. Pursuant to this process, prior to the annual meeting of shareholders at which an individual director’s term will expire, such director meets with our Chairman and also with the Chairperson of the Corporate Governance Committee to discuss participation on our Board and its committees and other relevant matters. In addition, the Corporate Governance Committee reviews such director’s attendance records, any changes in employment status and other information it deems helpful in considering and evaluating the director for nomination.

      Our Corporate Governance Principles contain Board membership criteria that apply to nominees for a position on our Board. The Board, based upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee (which recommendation will be based on the criteria set forth below, regardless of whether the nominee is identified by the Corporate Governance Committee, by shareholders or otherwise), will select new nominees considering the following criteria:

      Our Corporate Governance Committee has from time to time retained a third-party search firm to assist in identifying and evaluating potential nominees.

Majority Voting for Directors

      In February 2007, our Board amended our By-Laws and Corporate Governance Principles to change the voting standard for the election of our directors in uncontested elections from a plurality standard to a majority voting standard. An uncontested election for directors is an election where the number of properly nominated directors does not exceed the number of director positions to be filled. In contested director elections, the plurality standard will apply, which means the nominees receiving the greatest numbers of votes will be elected to serve as directors. To be elected in an uncontested election, a director nominee must receive more “For” votes than “Against” votes. Abstentions will have no effect on an uncontested election of directors since only votes “For” or “Against” a nominee will be counted. If a nominee does not receive a greater number of “For” votes than “Against” votes, he or she must promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the vote. The Corporate Governance Committee shall consider the resignation offer and shall recommend to the Board the action to be taken. The Board shall take action within 90 days following certification of the vote, unless such action would cause us to fail to comply with NYSE independence or other legal requirements, in which event the Board shall take action as promptly as practicable. The Board will also promptly publicly disclose its decision and the reasons therefor.

      If the Board does not accept the resignation, the nominee will continue to serve until the next annual meeting for the year in which his or her term expires and until his or her successor shall be duly elected and qualified, or until his or her prior resignation, death or removal. If the Board accepts the resignation, then the Board, in its sole discretion, may fill any resulting vacancy or may decrease the size of the Board. The election for directors at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is an uncontested election.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS

      Our Board compensation program is intended to attract and retain directors with demonstrated ability, integrity, judgment and experience to fulfill their responsibility to oversee management and to develop and oversee the implementation of strategies aimed at creating sustainable long-term value for our shareholders. The program is also intended to recognize the time commitments and liability associated with serving on the board of a public company.

      The form and amount of director compensation is periodically reviewed and assessed by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee reviews data concerning director compensation practices, levels and trends for companies comparable to us in revenue, businesses and complexity, which data is provided by consultants, including Towers Perrin LLP. Changes to director compensation, if any, are recommended by the Corporate Governance Committee to the Board for action. Employee directors are not compensated for service as a director.

Retainer and Attendance Fees

      Directors who are not employees of Harris currently receive the following fees, as applicable, for their services on our Board:

Equity Awards and Deferred Compensation

      Under the Harris Corporation 2005 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended (the “Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan”), on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, we credit each non-employee director’s account with a number of Harris stock equivalent units having a fair market value equal to $24,000 (for an annual rate of $96,000), which amount may be changed from time to time by our Board.

      In addition, under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, prior to the commencement of a calendar year, each non-employee director may make an irrevocable election to defer all or a portion of his or her cash compensation for the subsequent year or years. The Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan replaced the 1997 Directors’ Deferred Compensation and Annual Stock Unit Award Plan (the “1997 Directors’ Plan”). Effective December 31, 2004 no further deferrals of director compensation were permitted and no further annual awards were made under the 1997 Directors’ Plan.

      Amounts deferred at the election of a non-employee director under such plans are invested in investment alternatives that mirror those available under our Retirement Plan or in Harris stock equivalent units based upon the fair market value of Harris common stock on the date of deferral. Such Harris stock equivalent units are equivalent in value to shares of our common stock. A non-employee director may not transfer or reallocate amounts deferred into other investments into Harris stock equivalent units. Amounts credited in Harris stock equivalent units may be reallocated into any other investment alternatives provided director minimum stock ownership guidelines are satisfied. Deferred amounts and investment earnings on such amounts are payable in cash following the non-employee director’s resignation, retirement or death. Each Harris stock equivalent unit is credited with dividend equivalents equal to the dividends paid on our common stock, which are deemed reinvested in additional Harris stock equivalent units on the dividend payment date.

      A non-employee director may elect to receive deferred amounts either in a cash lump sum on a date certain within five years after his or her resignation or retirement or in annual substantially equal cash installments over a designated number of years beginning on a date certain within five years after a director’s resignation or retirement, provided that all amounts are fully paid within ten years after resignation or retirement.

      Within 90 days of a change in control and to the extent permitted by the regulations adopted under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, each non-employee director (or former non-employee director) will receive a lump sum cash payment equal to the then-remaining balance in his or her deferred accounts.

      Amounts credited to directors’ accounts in the director deferred compensation plans may be partially or fully funded by a grantor trust, also known as a “rabbi trust,” but the assets in such trust are subject to the claims of our creditors and directors are treated as our unsecured general creditors.

Reimbursement, Insurance and Charitable Gift Matching

      We reimburse each non-employee director for travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings and other meetings on our behalf and for the costs and expenses of attending director education programs. Spouses or guests are invited occasionally to accompany directors to Board-related events, for which we pay or reimburse travel and related expenses. In addition, we provide each non-employee director with accidental death and dismemberment insurance in the amount of up to $200,000 and business travel insurance of up to an additional $200,000 in the event that he or she is involved in an accident while traveling on business relating to our affairs. We pay the premiums for such insurance and the total aggregate premiums for coverage for all non-employee directors during fiscal 2007 was $450.

      Non-employee directors may participate in our charitable gift matching program available to all employees, where we match contributions to eligible post-secondary educational institutions and charitable organizations up to an annual maximum of $10,000 per employee or director.

Fiscal 2007 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors

      The following table sets forth information regarding compensation to each of our non-employee directors for fiscal 2007. We do not currently have a non-equity incentive plan or pension plan for directors.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors

      To further align the interests of members of our Board and shareholders, our Board has previously approved stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors. Such directors are expected to own, within five years after election or appointment to our Board, Harris stock or stock equivalents having a minimum value of four times such directors’ basic annual retainer, which value is currently $220,000 (based upon the current $55,000 basic annual retainer). As of September 15, 2007, all of our non-employee directors met the stock ownership guidelines.

Indemnification

      We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and Board elected officers including the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38. These agreements require us to indemnify these directors and officers with respect to their activities as a director, officer or employee of Harris, or when serving at our request as a director, officer or trustee of another corporation, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement) actually and reasonably incurred by them in any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative to which they are, or are threatened to be made, parties as a result of their service to us.

      Under the indemnification agreements, each director or officer will continue to be indemnified even after ceasing to occupy a position as an officer, director, employee or agent of Harris with respect to suits or proceedings arising from his or her service to us.

OUR LARGEST SHAREHOLDERS

      The rules of the SEC require disclosure regarding any persons known to us to be a beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock. The following table sets forth as of July 27, 2007 the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person who has reported to the SEC beneficially owning more than five percent of our common stock, based on the reports filed by these persons.

SHARES HELD BY OUR DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

      The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of shares and equivalent units of our common stock, as of July 27, 2007, by (a) each director, including the nominees for election at the 2007 Annual Meeting, (b) our Chief Executive Officer and each other named executive officer, and (c) all our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise noted, the named individual had sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities. As of July 27, 2007, no individual director, nominee for director or named executive officer beneficially owned 1% or more of our common stock. As of July 27, 2007, our directors and executive officers, as a group, beneficially owned 1.39% of our common stock.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

      The following Report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and the Report should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by Harris under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent Harris specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

      The role of the Audit Committee is, among other things, to assist the Board in its oversight of:

      The Board has determined that, in its business judgment, all members of the Audit Committee are independent within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules of the SEC and Harris’ Director Independence Standards.

      Management of Harris is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of Harris’ financial statements and the effectiveness of Harris’ system of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. Management and the internal auditing department are responsible for maintaining and evaluating appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles and internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”), is responsible for auditing the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion as to whether such financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. E&Y is also responsible for auditing management’s assessment and the effectiveness of Harris’ internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management, the head of Internal Audit and E&Y. The Audit Committee discussed with the internal auditors and E&Y the overall scope of and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee also met with E&Y, the head of Internal Audit, the Principal Accounting Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, the reasonableness of significant judgments, the evaluations of Harris’ internal control over financial reporting and the overall quality of Harris’ financial reporting. Management has represented to the Audit Committee that Harris’ consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

      In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee has:

      In reliance upon the reports, reviews and discussions described in this Report, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in Harris’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2007, for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee also has appointed, and has requested shareholder ratification of the appointment of, E&Y as Harris’ independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 27, 2008.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

      The Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of our proxy statement is intended to help our shareholders understand our executive compensation philosophy, objectives, elements, policies and practices. It is also intended to provide context for the compensation information for our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers (our “named executive officers”) detailed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38 and in the other tables and narrative discussion that follows.

Philosophy and Objectives of Our Compensation Program

      The overall objective of our executive compensation program is to foster the creation of sustainable long-term value for our shareholders. The following principles and guidelines provide a framework for our overall executive compensation program:

Our Executive Compensation Process

      The philosophy, objectives, elements, policies and practices of compensation for our executive officers are set by the Management Development and Compensation Committee of our Board (the “Compensation Committee”). The Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, reviews and approves the features and design of our executive compensation program, and approves the compensation levels, individual objectives and financial targets for our executive officers, other than our CEO. The independent directors of the Board approve the compensation level and individual objectives and financial targets for our CEO. The Compensation Committee also reviews and assesses the relationship between our executive compensation program and the achievement of our financial goals and strategic objectives with an emphasis on creating a “pay for profitable growth” environment.

      In fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, an independent executive compensation consulting firm, to provide objective analysis, advice and information to the Compensation Committee related to CEO compensation, including competitive market data. Pearl Meyer & Partners reports to the Compensation Committee and does not provide any services to Harris management. In addition, the Compensation Committee has also utilized the services of Towers Perrin, LLP in the limited area of retirement benefits for our CEO. Our management uses Towers Perrin to provide director and executive officer compensation, actuarial and benefit plan consulting services and provides the Compensation Committee with details of the work performed by Towers Perrin and its fees. The Compensation Committee has determined that providing these services to management does not impair the ability of Towers Perrin to render impartial services to the Compensation Committee in the limited area of CEO retirement benefits.

      The Compensation Committee considers recommendations from our CEO and senior management in making decisions regarding our executive compensation program and compensation of our executive officers. As part of the annual compensation planning process, our CEO and other senior executives recommend targets for our incentive compensation programs to the Compensation Committee. Following an annual performance review process, including assessment of the achievement of established financial and non-financial objectives, our CEO also recommends base salary and incentive and equity awards for our other executive officers. Our CEO presents to the Compensation Committee his evaluation of each such executive officer’s contributions during the previous year, including strengths and development needs, and reviews succession plans for each of the executive positions. Individual performance impacts the compensation of our employees, especially the CEO and our executive officers.

      After input from our CEO and management, as well as from the Compensation Committee’s independent consultants and the assessment of trends and competitive data, the Compensation Committee determines what changes, if any, should be made to the executive compensation program and sets the level of each compensation element for our executive officers. Consistent with this practice, the Compensation Committee reviews each executive officer’s three-year compensation history, including base salary, annual cash incentive and equity awards and also reviews the types and levels of other benefits such as change in control severance agreements,

retirement plans and perquisites. In the case of our CEO, the review and final determination is made by all of our independent directors of the Board, giving due consideration to the Compensation Committee’s recommendations.

      In setting the levels of compensation at the start of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee also establishes the short- and long-term financial measures, weighting and targets. For our CEO, the Compensation Committee recommends such measures, weighting and targets to our independent directors of the Board. The specific financial measures, targets and objectives are believed to foster the creation of sustainable long-term value for our shareholders and are aligned with our Board-approved, long-term strategic growth plan and annual operating plan.

      At the end of each fiscal year, the independent directors of the Board meet in executive session under the leadership of the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee to conduct a performance review of our CEO. During such review, the directors evaluate the CEO’s achievement of agreed-upon objectives established at the start of the year, overall performance, the CEO’s personal self-evaluation of his effectiveness over the past year and other accomplishments. For the other executive officers, the Compensation Committee receives a specific compensation recommendation from our CEO, which is based upon an assessment of the performance, achievement of objectives for the executive and their organization established at the start of the fiscal year, contribution to company performance and other accomplishments.

Competitive Benchmarking

      Each element of our executive compensation program is addressed in the context of competitive practices. The Compensation Committee reviews external benchmarks, surveys and trend information from multiple executive compensation surveys and consultants. The Compensation Committee benchmarks total target compensation and each element of compensation for our CEO and other executives to be within a range around the 50th percentile of the market. While the Compensation Committee reviews benchmark data, it retains discretion in setting an executive’s compensation, and as a result compensation for an executive may differ materially from the benchmarks and is influenced by factors including experience, position, tenure, individual and organization factors, retention needs and other factors. For fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners to assess CEO median pay levels, the competitive position of our CEO’s compensation and the mix and elements of CEO pay. The comparison group used for assessing CEO compensation consists of companies with one or more of the following attributes: business operations in the industries and businesses in which we participate; similar revenue and market capitalization; and businesses that are complex and broad and/or compete with us for executive talent. For fiscal 2007, the comparison group used for assessing our CEO’s compensation consisted of the following 21 companies:

      The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the appropriateness of the comparison group used for assessing our CEO’s compensation and makes changes it determines are appropriate.

      For executive officers other than our CEO, the competitive data considered for fiscal 2007 was based upon a composite of broad survey data provided by Towers Perrin, Hewitt Associates and Radford.

Elements of Our Compensation Program

      During fiscal 2007, the compensation program for our executive officers consisted of the following elements:

      The Compensation Committee believes that the elements of our executive compensation program are competitive and further our objectives of motivating achievement of our short- and long-term financial performance goals and strategic objectives, rewarding superior performance and aligning the interests of our executives and shareholders.

Named Executive Officer Target Direct Compensation Mix

      The following table sets forth the target fiscal 2007 compensation for our named executive officers by type of compensation as a percentage of the executives’ target total direct compensation. The table demonstrates the compensation philosophy described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis in which the significant majority of our executives’ compensation is at risk in the form of performance-based awards and equity awards. The targets were set at the start of fiscal 2007. The Annual Base Salary Rate in the table is the annual rate of base salary approved for the named executive officers effective September 1, 2006. Target Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation is the target annual incentive compensation payable for achievement of financial measures at target. The Target Equity Award dollar value is based upon a multiple of annual base salary established for each of the named executive officers. Such dollar value was used to determine the actual number of stock options granted and performance shares or performance share units awarded as discussed below. These values differ from the dollar values for stock awards and option awards set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38 which are based upon the amount of FAS 123R expense recognized in fiscal 2007 for awards and grants made in fiscal 2007 and prior fiscal years. The percentages illustrate the portion of Target Total Direct Compensation that each of the components represents.

Base Salary and How Base Salary is Determined

General Considerations

      We provide executives with a base salary for services rendered during the year. The Compensation Committee reviews executive base salaries on an annual basis as well as any time there is a substantial change in responsibilities.

      In line with motivating achievement of financial performance goals and strategic objectives and related focus on at-risk compensation, the Compensation Committee seeks to have the majority of the executive officers’ pay at-risk in the form of short- and long-term compensation opportunity. When the Compensation Committee sets the executive officers’ base salaries, it takes into account each officer’s level and amount of responsibility. In general, executive officers with higher levels and amounts of responsibility have a lower percentage of their compensation fixed as base salary and a higher percentage of their compensation at risk.

2007 Base Salary for Named Executive Officers

      In August 2006, the Compensation Committee determined that base salary increases were appropriate for the named executive officers based upon consideration of the comparative compensation data, targets for annual total cash compensation, performance for the prior fiscal year, the other factors discussed above and the CEO’s recommendations for the other named executive officers.

      Mr. Lance’s base salary was increased in fiscal 2007 by 2.7% to $950,000. Mr. Lance’s percentage increase was lower than the other named executive officers as the independent Board members determined to further the objective of having more of his compensation tied to performance. Mr. McArthur’s base salary was increased 18.8% to $380,000, reflecting adjustments as a result of his promotion to chief financial officer in March 2006 as well as a merit increase. Mr. Henry’s base salary was increased 11.1% to $500,000, reflecting adjustments as a result of his increased responsibilities as well as a merit increase. The 6.3% increase for Mr. Thorsteinson to $425,000 was based upon merit. Mr. Thorsteinson is located in our offices in Toronto, Canada. Pursuant to the terms of his employment letter agreement, Mr. Thorsteinson’s base salary is expressed in U.S. dollars and paid to him in Canadian dollars at a conversion rate that is set forth in his employment letter agreement and reviewed periodically. The 7.6% increase for Mr. Shuman to $355,000 was based upon merit.

Annual Incentive Pay and How Annual Incentive Pay is Determined

Annual Incentive Plan

      Under our Annual Incentive Plan, which was approved by our shareholders in October 2005, the Compensation Committee sets an annual incentive compensation target for each executive officer and recommends to the independent directors of the Board the target for our CEO. The Compensation Committee also establishes specific financial performance measures and targets including the relative weighting and thresholds. The financial measures are aligned with our Board-approved annual operating plan, and during the year regular reports are made to the Board about our performance compared with the targets. The Compensation Committee selects performance measures and targets believed to be important indicators of our progress and success. In certain instances, targets established at the start of the fiscal year are adjusted by the Compensation Committee to take into account items determined not to be reflective of normal, ongoing business operations. Through our Annual Incentive Plan a substantial portion of an executive’s annual cash compensation is directly tied to our financial performance. The target amount of variable, at-risk annual cash compensation tied to our performance also generally increases with an executive’s level of management responsibility. For the executive officers other than our CEO, the amount paid is based upon actual performance for the year against the financial targets, subject to an upward or downward adjustment ranging from zero to 20% of the financial calculation. This adjustment is determined by the Compensation Committee based upon the recommendation of the CEO and an assessment of the achievement of individual priority objectives established at the start of the year.

      Our CEO’s annual incentive compensation is subject to a maximum set by the independent directors of the Board at the start of each fiscal

year based upon an earnings per share (“EPS”) target, with the actual amount based upon actual performance for the year against EPS and revenue financial targets and the assessment against individual objectives established at the start of the year that the independent directors of the Board determined are important to our strategic success.

      The Compensation Committee believes that these financial performance measures encourage our executives and employees to focus on improving both revenue and profitability. We believe these measures are also effective motivators because they are measurable, clearly understood and the drivers of the creation of sustainable long-term value for our shareholders.

      For each financial measure, there is no payout for performance below the threshold which in fiscal 2007 was 50% of target for EPS and segment operating income and was 80% of target for revenue. For performance of a financial measure above threshold up to the target, the payout factor is calculated on a one-for-one basis (for example, if EPS is at 70% of target, the EPS payout factor is 70% of target). For performance above target, the payout factor is calculated on a two-for-one basis up to a maximum payout factor of 200% of target for such measure (for example, if EPS is at 110% of target, the fiscal 2007 payout factor is 120% for the portion of the annual incentive based upon EPS).

2007 Annual Incentive Awards for Named Executive Officers

      For fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee, and with respect to our CEO, the independent directors of the Board, approved the financial measures and weighting, target incentives and the payouts, which also reflected an assessment of individual objectives, for the named executive officers as follows:

     For fiscal 2007, the Harris EPS target used for the named executive officers, and the Harris revenue target, used for Messrs. Lance, McArthur and Shuman, were $2.61 and $4.0 billion, respectively. For Mr. Henry, the fiscal 2007 segment revenue and operating income measures were based upon the combined targets for the Government Communications Systems segment and the RF Communications segment, which targets were $2.99 billion for segment revenue and $570 million for segment operating income. Fiscal 2007 segment revenue and operating income targets for the Broadcast Communications segment, which were applicable to Mr. Thorsteinson, were $645 million for revenue and $82 million for operating income. These financial measures and targets represent internal measurements of performance, and while we make the calculations based upon our financial results calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) our results may be adjusted by the Compensation Committee to take into account items determined not to be reflective of normal, ongoing business operations. In making specific decisions on which items to include or exclude from our financial results the Compensation Committee has adopted guidelines, including that any adjustment must be objectively measurable under GAAP.

      Our actual fiscal 2007 performance for the financial measures was: $3.43 for EPS; $4.2 billion for Harris revenue; $3.2 billion for combined revenue for the Government Communications Systems and the RF Communications segments, with combined operating income of $629 million; and $600 million revenue for the Broadcast Communications segment with operating income of $11.9 million. The Compensation Committee adjusted the EPS results from $3.43 downward to $2.79 to eliminate the impact of the gain on the combination of our former Microwave Communications Systems Division and Stratex Networks, Inc. and unforecasted charges for asset impairments, restructuring charges, severance costs, and acquisition- and combination-related costs. The Compensation Committee also adjusted the segment operating income results of the Broadcast Communications segment from $11.9 million to $41 million to eliminate unforecasted charges for such items as severance, facility exit and impairment of capitalized software.

      An upward adjustment of 11% was made to Mr. Lance’s calculated incentive amount based upon the Compensation Committee’s recommendation to the independent members of the Board regarding Mr. Lance’s performance against the following individual objectives established at the start of the fiscal year: (1) technology development, transfer and

commercialization; (2) execution of our international business plan; and (3) organization development including management depth, diversity and employee engagement/motivation.

      Final fiscal 2007 annual incentive payments approved by the Compensation Committee for the other named executive officers were adjusted from 2% lower to 6% higher than the calculated amount resulting from adjusted performance results compared with financial targets. The adjustments made were based upon our CEO’s recommendation as a result of his assessment of individual performance versus the pre-established individual objectives.

      The annual cash incentive payouts in respect of fiscal 2007 also appear in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38 under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.

Long-Term Compensation —

Equity Incentives and How Long-Term

Compensation is Determined

      We provide long-term incentives through a combination of stock options and performance share awards. The long-term compensation elements of our executive compensation program are designed to motivate our executives to focus on achievement of our long-term financial goals. Performance share grants motivate our executives to achieve our long-term financial goals and link such financial results with the performance of our stock over a three-year period. Under such grants, each new fiscal year begins a new three-year performance cycle for which the Compensation Committee establishes financial targets and award targets. Equity awards are also intended to retain executives, encourage share ownership and maintain a direct link between our executive compensation program and the value and appreciation in value of our stock. The total value of long-term compensation for our executive officers is typically set by reference to a multiple of such executive officers’ base salary, which equity-based multiple is assessed using the CEO comparison group for our CEO and the composite of broad survey data for the other named executive officers.

      For fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee determined that 60% of the value of long-term incentive opportunity at the time of award would be allocated as stock options and 40% would be allocated as performance shares. The value of performance share awards was set by converting such value into a number of performance shares based upon our 60-day average stock price ending in mid-August 2006, several weeks in advance of the actual grant approved at the Compensation Committee’s late-August 2006 meeting. In determining the number of options to be granted, the Compensation Committee derived an approximate value for each option using such 60-day average stock price and the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model and then divided the target long-term incentive value to be delivered in the form of stock options by such option value.

Stock Options

      Stock options directly align the interests of executives and shareholders as the options only result in gain to the recipient if our stock price increases above the exercise price of the options. In addition, options are intended to help retain key employees because they vest over a period of three years and, if not exercised, are forfeited if the employee leaves Harris before retirement, subject to limited exceptions discussed below.

      The Compensation Committee, together with the independent directors of the Board in the case of our CEO, considers annual grants of stock options to our executive officers at the beginning of each fiscal year. Stock options granted to our named executive officers and other employees during fiscal 2007 were made pursuant to our Harris Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by our shareholders in October 2005, and have the following terms:

      A listing of the stock options granted to our named executive officers in fiscal 2007 appears in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2007 Table on page 40. For additional information relating to the terms and conditions of stock options, see the notes to the Outstanding Equity

Awards at 2007 Fiscal Year End Table on page 42.

Performance Share Awards

      Financial measures for performance shares granted in fiscal 2007 covering the three-year performance period of fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2009 include the achievement of cumulative EPS for the three-year period and average return on invested capital against targets, weighted equally. We believe EPS and average return on invested capital encourage our executives to focus on improving earnings and capital management over the long-term and that these measures align with our objective of creating sustainable long-term value for our shareholders. The Compensation Committee also reviews our performance during the three-year period compared with companies included in the Standard and Poor’s 500 and Midcap 400 indices and may adjust payouts up or down based on this review of our relative performance. The actual performance share award payout with respect to fiscal 2007 grants can range from 0% to 150% of the target number of performance shares. For additional information relating to the terms and conditions of performance shares, see the notes to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2007 Table on page 40.

      For fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee, and with respect to Mr. Lance, the independent directors of the Board, approved the grant of performance shares to our named executive officers for the three-year performance period covering fiscal years 2007 through 2009 as set forth in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2007 Table on page 40 and related notes.

      In August 2007, the Compensation Committee, and for Mr. Lance, the independent directors of the Board, determined the payout of performance shares for the three-year performance period which began on July 1, 2004 and ended on June 29, 2007. Financial measures for awards made in fiscal 2005 for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2007 were three-year cumulative EPS and average return on invested capital for each fiscal year of such period. Such measures were equally weighted. Actual EPS results for such period were adjusted by the Compensation Committee to eliminate the impact of the gain on the combination of our Microwave Communications Division and Stratex Networks, Inc., and unforecasted charges for asset impairments, restructuring charges, severance costs, and acquisition- and combination-related costs. These adjustments were made in accordance with the guidelines adopted by the Compensation Committee and discussed above. As a result, the three-year cumulative EPS financial measure on which performance was measured for purposes of the fiscal 2007 payout was $6.07, significantly higher than the $3.90 target set at the start of fiscal 2005. Actual average return on invested capital for such years was adjusted by the Compensation Committee for the same items as the three-year cumulative EPS. As a result, the average return on invested capital for the three years was 11.1%, or 120% higher than the 9.2% target set at the start of fiscal 2005. The Compensation Committee determined that such results were significantly above plan and that our top quartile EPS growth and second quartile return on invested capital performance compared to companies included in the Standard and Poor’s 500 and Midcap 400 indices warranted a payout at 150% of target. See the Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2007 Table on page 44 and related notes for additional information regarding these payouts.

Restricted Stock

      As part of long-term incentive compensation, the Compensation Committee may also grant shares of restricted stock primarily to facilitate retention and succession planning and as a mechanism to replace the value of equity awards that may have been forfeited as a result of leaving a former employer. The restrictions typically expire at the end of a three- to five-year period. The restrictions provide that the shares may not be sold or otherwise transferred, and the shares will be immediately forfeited in the event of the recipient’s termination of employment for any reason other than death, disability or retirement. Such shares of restricted stock provide for the payment of cash dividend equivalents. For information related to restricted stock granted to our named executive officers, see the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2007 Fiscal Year End Table on page 42 and related notes.

Recovery of Executive Compensation

      Our executive compensation program permits us to recover all or a portion of any performance-

based compensation if our financial statements are restated as a result of errors, omissions or fraud. The amount to be recovered shall be the amount by which the affected compensation exceeded the amount that would have been payable had the financial statements been initially filed as restated, or any greater or lesser amount that the Compensation Committee shall determine. In no case shall the amount to be recovered be less than the amount required to be repaid or recovered as a matter of law. Recovery of such amounts by us would be in addition to any actions imposed by law, enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities.

Change in Control Arrangements

      Under our Annual Incentive Plan and equity incentive plans, upon a change in control and irrespective of employment status:

      We believe that these payments following a change in control for annual incentive compensation and equity awards irrespective of employment status, a “single trigger,” are appropriate due to the potential change in the nature and form of such compensation caused by a change in control and to ensure that participants are not deprived of benefits that they have earned or reasonably would expect to receive if a change in control did not occur. We believe that the potential for these payments is an important tool to align the interests of our shareholders and our executive officers, especially in periods when a change in control can occur. Based upon a review of broad survey data we also believe that immediate vesting and these potential payments are competitive and reasonable.

      Information regarding severance payments and obligations to named executive officers for termination of employment following a change in control is set forth below in the “Change in Control Severance Agreements” section of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section of this proxy statement.

Post-Employment Compensation

Severance Arrangements

      As a general matter, most of our employees are “employees at-will” and only a limited number of our executive officers have contracts requiring us to pay amounts to them upon termination of employment. Mr. Lance’s employment is governed by an employment letter agreement discussed below. If Mr. Thorsteinson’s employment is involuntarily terminated without cause, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment equal to his then-current base salary plus an amount equal to the annual cash incentive paid to him for the prior fiscal year. Pursuant to his offer letter, Mr. Shuman is entitled to one year of severance benefits in the form of base salary and pro-rated incentive compensation in the event his employment is terminated other than for cause or performance reasons. While Messrs. McArthur and Henry do not have severance agreements, we have a long-standing practice of providing reasonable severance compensation for terminating an executive’s employment other than for cause. The specific amount may be based upon the relevant circumstances, including the reason for termination, length of employment and other factors.

      We also have a severance plan for all full-time, U.S.-based employees who are terminated as a result of a reduction-in-force. Amounts payable under this plan are based upon length of service.

Employment Agreement with our CEO

      We are party to a letter agreement with Mr. Lance that provides for his continued employment as our CEO and president and his continued service as a director and the Chairman of the Board. The agreement provides for certain benefits in the event Mr. Lance’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by Mr. Lance for “good reason” (as defined in the agreement). Obligations in the event of a termination following a change in control are governed by Mr. Lance’s change in control severance agreement. The Compensation Committee and our independent directors approved Mr. Lance’s agreement in the belief that

such agreement assists in retaining Mr. Lance’s valued service. In addition, Mr. Lance’s agreement also binds Mr. Lance to certain non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality undertakings which are valuable to us.

Change in Control Severance Agreements

      Each of our Board-elected corporate officers, including the named executive officers, is party to a change in control severance agreement with us. We believe that such agreements align the interests of our officers and shareholders during a period of an actual or rumored change in control and are also necessary in some cases to attract and retain executives. Under these agreements, our officers are provided with severance benefits in the event the officer’s employment is terminated by us without “cause,” or by the officer for “good reason,” within two years following a change in control. These agreements are designed so that benefits are provided only if there is both a change in control and a termination of employment, a “double-trigger.” Such severance benefits are designed to preserve the focus and productivity of our officers, avoid disruption and prevent attrition during a period of uncertainty. These agreements also are believed to make the objective assessment of a potential transaction that may be in our shareholders’ best interests easier notwithstanding the potential negative impact of a transaction on an executive’s future employment.

      The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of a compensation consultant, annually reviews the terms of the current change in control severance agreement and potential compensation and payouts resulting from a potential change in control in light of competitive practices and market trends. The Compensation Committee has determined in its business judgment that the substantive terms of these severance agreements are competitive and reasonable. A gross-up for the excise tax imposed by the IRS on “parachute payments” is included as it is the Compensation Committee’s intent to provide an officer with the compensation the officer expected to receive, absent the change in control, without reduction. All other applicable taxes remain the responsibility of the officer.

      A description of the material terms of the change in control severance agreements, Mr. Lance’s letter agreement, Mr. Thorsteinson’s letter agreement and Mr. Shuman’s offer letter, as well as a summary of potential payments upon termination or a change in control for our named executive officers, is set forth in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control” section of this proxy statement.

Retirement Programs

Retirement Plan

      We maintain a Retirement Plan, which is a tax-qualified, defined contribution retirement plan available to most of our U.S.-based employees. Subject to applicable Internal Revenue Code limits, employees may generally contribute up to 25% of eligible compensation, with named executive officers and other highly compensated employees limited to contributing 12% of eligible compensation. In addition, starting in fiscal 2008, employees generally may contribute up to 100% of profit sharing payments, subject to Internal Revenue Code limits. After one year (or, in certain cases, six months) of service we will make a matching contribution of up to 6% of eligible compensation.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

      To the extent contributions to the Retirement Plan are limited by the Internal Revenue Code, certain of our salaried employees, including the named executive officers other than Mr. Thorsteinson, are eligible to participate in our nonqualified, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). In addition, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, provide for the deferral of other compensation under the SERP, including equity awards.

      The value of contributions to our named executive officers under our Retirement Plan and SERP are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38 under the “All Other Compensation” column and related notes. Additional information regarding the SERP and credits to accounts under our SERP are set forth in the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” section of this proxy statement beginning on page 45.

Profit Sharing Plan

      We maintain a profit sharing plan available to most of our U.S.-based employees. Under this plan, if we are profitable, we will contribute a minimum of 2% to a maximum of 6% of an employee’s eligible compensation into the Retirement Plan, or to the extent contributions are limited by the Internal Revenue Code, we will credit such amount to an account in the SERP.

For amounts of eligible compensation above the social security wage base, we will contribute up to an additional 5.7% of eligible compensation. Starting in fiscal 2008, participants will receive profit sharing payments in cash unless they elect to defer the payment.

Supplemental Pension Plan for Mr. Lance

      In October 2006, we entered into an agreement to provide Mr. Lance with a defined retirement benefit. The Compensation Committee and independent directors of the Board determined in their business judgment to provide a supplemental retirement benefit to Mr. Lance because of the stage of his career during which he joined us and because he did not have a retirement benefit believed to be competitive with those of other chief executive officers. The intent of the plan is to provide sufficient funds so that Mr. Lance’s annual retirement benefit in the aggregate, including our contributions to the Retirement Plan and SERP and benefits under the Social Security Act and retirement benefits from prior employment, equals 50% of his final annual base salary and annual cash incentive target at retirement following age 60. The terms of Mr. Lance’s supplemental pension plan are believed to be competitive and result in a retirement benefit consistent with those provided to chief executive officers of our CEO comparison group. Additional information regarding Mr. Lance’s supplemental pension plan is set forth in the Pension Benefits in Fiscal 2007 Table and related discussion on page 44.

Welfare and Other Benefits

      We maintain welfare benefit programs for our U.S.-based employees, including medical and prescription coverage, dental and vision programs, short-term disability insurance, group life insurance, supplemental life insurance and dependent life insurance as well as customary vacation, leave of absence and other similar policies. Our executive officers are eligible to participate in these programs on the same basis as our other salaried employees. We also offer a long-term disability plan to all U.S.-based employees. The plan is self-insured and funded through employee contributions. The plan provides a benefit of 60% of eligible compensation before offsets for Social Security and other company or government provided disability benefits. Eligible compensation for the purposes of the long-term disability plan is limited to $225,000. For employees with eligible compensation in excess of $225,000, we provide an additional disability benefit of 50% of eligible compensation above $225,000 up to $800,000, for a maximum annual additional disability benefit of up to $287,500. We provide Mr. Lance a life insurance benefit at two and one-half times eligible compensation, subject to a limit of $10 million in coverage and also reimburse him for any federal income tax obligation resulting from this benefit.

Perquisites

      We provide a limited number of perquisites to our Board-elected officers, including our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the types and values of the perquisites and believes perquisites provided in fiscal 2007 are reasonable, competitive and consistent with our overall compensation philosophy. Such perquisites generally consist of the following: reimbursement of the costs of tax preparation and financial planning services of up to $5,000 (or $10,000 in the case of our CEO) per year; reimbursement of the costs of estate planning services of up to $5,000 (or $10,000 in the case of our CEO) over a three-year period; relocation assistance; reimbursement of the costs of the initiation fees and ongoing dues in one approved social or country club; and personal use of company-owned aircraft for the CEO, and in very limited instances as approved by the CEO, other executives.

      In consideration of the time demands on our CEO and to minimize and more effectively utilize his travel time, the Compensation Committee has authorized the personal use of the company aircraft by our CEO and his family when traveling with him. Such personal usage is subject to limits on the number of hours for personal usage which are set by the Compensation Committee and reviewed annually. In addition, our CEO is personally responsible for paying the tax on income imputed to him for personal use of the aircraft. Personal use of aircraft includes travel undertaken by our CEO to participate in outside board meetings, which is considered personal under SEC rules, but which we view as having a useful business purpose.

      We also provide Mr. Thorsteinson a car allowance pursuant to the terms of his employment letter agreement.

      These perquisites represent a small portion of the total compensation of each named executive

officer. The dollar values ascribed to these perquisites are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38 under the “All Other Compensation” column and related notes.

Policies Relating to Our Common Stock

Stock Ownership Guidelines

      To further promote ownership of shares by management and to more closely align management and shareholder interests, the Compensation Committee has established stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers. Executives are expected to own Harris stock having a minimum value, denominated as a multiple of their annual base salaries, which can be accumulated over a three-year period from the date of hire or promotion into an officer position.

      The stock ownership guidelines are as follows:

      Shares that count toward the stock ownership guidelines include shares owned outright or jointly by the executive, shares owned in our Retirement Plan, share equivalents represented by amounts deferred in the Harris stock fund account of our SERP, and restricted stock. Stock options and unearned performance shares do not count for the purpose of measuring compliance with the ownership guidelines. Executives age 62 or older are no longer subject to the guidelines. An annual review is conducted by the Compensation Committee to assess compliance with the guidelines. As of September 15, 2007, all named executive officers met their applicable ownership guidelines, or were on track to achieve their ownership guidelines within the applicable compliance timeframe.

Our Equity-Based Compensation Award Practices

      The annual grant cycle for executive officer stock option grants and other equity awards typically occurs at the same time as decisions relating to salary increases and other annual cash incentive awards. This occurs at the start of each fiscal year, typically in late August, following the release of our financial results for the preceding fiscal year and the completion of the audit of our financial statements. The dates for the meetings at which such grants are typically made are set well in advance of such meetings, typically one year or more. For the past several years, the annual equity grant date for our eligible employees has occurred on the same date as the grant to executive officers. The Compensation Committee may also make grants of equity awards to executive officers at other times during the year due to special circumstances, such as new hires or promotions. We do not reprice options and if our stock price declines after the grant date, we do not replace options. We do not seek to time equity grants to take advantage of information, either positive or negative, about Harris that has not been publicly disclosed. The exercise price of options is the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant or, if the grant is made on a weekend or holiday, the closing market price of our common stock on the prior business day. Our Compensation Committee or Board also has the discretion to set the exercise price of options higher than the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant.

      In June 2007, the Compensation Committee approved a formal policy on equity grant practices. The policy re-affirms many of our current equity grant practices and also provides that the grant date of equity awards made outside of the annual grant cycle, whether for promotions, recognition or for new hires, shall be the first trading day of the month following the promotion, recognition or hire date, provided if such trading day is during a “quiet period” under our insider trading policy, the grant will be made on the first trading day following the end of such period.

Insider Trading Policy

      Our insider trading policy prohibits directors, employees and certain of their family members from purchasing or selling any type of security, whether issued by us or another company, while aware of material non-public information relating to the issuer of the security or from providing such material non-public information to any person who may trade while aware of such information. This policy also prohibits directors and employees from engaging in short sales with respect to our securities, or entering into puts, calls or other “derivative” transactions with respect to our securities. We also have procedures that require trades by directors and executive officers to be pre-cleared by appropriate Harris personnel.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation

      Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally prohibits a public company from deducting compensation paid in any year to named executive officers in excess of $1 million. Certain compensation is specifically exempt from the deduction limit to the extent it is “performance-based.” In evaluating whether to structure executive compensation components as performance-based and thus, tax deductible, the Compensation Committee considers the net cost to us, and its ability to effectively administer executive compensation in the long-term interest of shareholders. Stock option grants and performance share awards made to executive officers under our equity incentive plans and cash payments under our Annual Incentive Plan are structured generally to be fully deductible under Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee believes, however, that it is important to preserve the flexibility in administering compensation programs in a manner designed to promote corporate goals. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee from time to time has approved elements of compensation that were consistent with the objectives of our executive compensation program, but that may not be fully deductible. For example, grants of restricted stock or restricted stock units are not performance-based under Section 162(m) and, in certain instances, deductibility of such compensation may be limited.

      Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code requires that “nonqualified deferred compensation” be deferred and paid under plans or arrangements that satisfy the requirements of the law with respect to the timing of deferral elections, timing of payments and certain other matters. In general, it is our intention to design and administer our compensation and benefits plans and arrangements for all of our employees so that they are either exempt from, or satisfy the requirements of, Section 409A. We believe we are currently operating such plans in compliance with Section 409A. Pursuant to recently published final regulations, we may be required to amend some of our plans and arrangements to make them either exempt from, or comply with, Section 409A.

Accounting for Share-Based Compensation

      Before we grant share-based compensation awards, we consider the accounting impact of the award as structured and other scenarios in order to analyze the expected impact of the award.

MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

      The following Report of the Management Development and Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and the Report should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by Harris under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Harris specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

      The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement. Based on its review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board and the Board has approved, that this Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and incorporated by reference in Harris’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2007.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

      The following table summarizes the compensation of our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2007. The named executive officers are our CEO, our Chief Financial Officer, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers based upon their total compensation as reflected in the table below (reduced by the amount in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column).

All Other Compensation Table

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 2007

      The following table provides information about cash and equity incentive compensation awarded to our named executive officers in fiscal 2007, including: (1) the grant date of equity awards; (2) the range of possible cash payouts under our Annual Incentive Plan for fiscal 2007 performance; (3) the range of performance shares that may be earned in respect of the fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2009 performance period; (4) restricted stock units granted to Mr. Thorsteinson; (5) the number and exercise price of stock option grants; and (6) the grant date fair value of the performance shares, performance share units, restricted stock units and stock options computed under FAS 123R.